As you may have heard, Motor Trend magazine has named the Chevy Volt its “Car of the Year:”
“some of the most advanced engineering ever seen in a mainstream American automobile … Attention to detail is impressive … The front end graphic is outstanding — strong, confident, and tastefully upscale … Just counting the gas, the Volt returned 126.7 mpg. Converting the gas used to energy used (79.5 kW-hr) and adding that figure to the electrical energy used gave us a notional 72.9 mpg. … Moonshot. Game-changer. A car of the future that you can drive today, and every day.”
But Rush Limbaugh wasn’t impressed with the latest offering from the much-despised “Government Motors”:
“Folks, of all the cars, no offense, General Motors, please, but of all the cars in the world, the Chevrolet Volt is the Car of the Year? Motor Trend magazine, that’s the end of them. How in the world do they have any credibility? Not one has been sold. The Volt is the Car of the Year.”
Todd Lassa of Motor Trend then responded to Rush’s attack on his magazine’s credibility with a rebuttal that is, shall we say, a little pointed.
“Our credibility, Mr. Limbaugh, comes from actually driving and testing the car, and understanding its advanced technology. It comes from driving and testing virtually every new car sold, and from doing this once a year with all the all-new or significantly improved models all at the same time. We test, make judgments and write about things we understand….
“If you can stop shilling for your favorite political party long enough to go for a drive, you might really enjoy the Chevy Volt. I’m sure GM would be happy to lend you one for the weekend. Just remember: driving and Oxycontin don’t mix.”
361 comments Add your comment
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
10:44 am
“…driving and Oxycontin don’t mix.”
Another I don’t care who you are thass funny one!
DannyX
November 24th, 2010
10:47 am
Congrats Obama!
Not only did Obama and Government Motors win Motor Trend Car of the Year, they also won the same award from Automobile Magazine.
Green Car of the Year too!
Bye Bye Empire
November 24th, 2010
10:49 am
Ups, better add another walk of life to our list of those in which Mr. Limbaugh’s droppings have had to be picked up. First it was the realm of sports, where his star-crossed bid for NFL franchise ownership had to be set run through the heart with a stake, and now this.
Jefferson
November 24th, 2010
10:50 am
Only the weak minded would belive anything Limbaugh spews.
Northern Songs, Ltd
November 24th, 2010
10:52 am
@Jefferson – you mean like the imperial storm troopers and jawas that litter today’s republican party?
jasper
November 24th, 2010
10:55 am
While I’m thrilled that an electric car is getting front and center attention, it does make you wonder, how many labor union members subscribe to Motor Trend. I’m sure they’re not paying for it.
Mick
November 24th, 2010
10:57 am
Flush rimbaugh & crew, the face of the republican party, what a drag…
Intown
November 24th, 2010
11:00 am
Woohoo Motor Trend! Sanity 1 – Fear 0.
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
11:02 am
Mick
“…what a drag…”
Car race or stage show…?
kitty
November 24th, 2010
11:02 am
Glad I wasn’t taking a drink of coffee when I read that last line. Hilarious.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:04 am
“Car race or stage show…?”
Or both?
Dusty
November 24th, 2010
11:05 am
Awwww from Jihad to carwash!! I’ll keep my Cavalier. You can bolt with the Volt, thank you.
Now let’s talk TURKEY. (No, @@, not that one.) Anybody for oyster dressing?
Matti
November 24th, 2010
11:05 am
Hahaha! Good one.
Del
November 24th, 2010
11:05 am
Be among the first 200000 buyers and get a $7,500. tax credit from the tax payers, however, if you’re subject to the AMT, you need not apply.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:05 am
“Glad I wasn’t taking a drink of coffee when I read that last line. Hilarious”
Same here!
Kamchak
November 24th, 2010
11:06 am
Limbaugh opining about automotive engineering is like Paris Hilton opining about thermodynamics.
Call it like it is
November 24th, 2010
11:08 am
Thats some funny stuff. But hey before you buy one of those green cars, make sure you ask how much the battery is to replace if you every have too. I think most of you would be shocked! The money you saved on gas will be gone.
BlahBlahBlah
November 24th, 2010
11:10 am
You would think such an awesome car wouldn’t need a huge tax credit to encourage sales.
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
11:11 am
DUSTY
No er-stuhs in my dressing! I’ll get my snot from the Little Ones at school!
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
11:15 am
Limbaugh asking how anyone else has any credibility! Now that’s priceless.
Del
November 24th, 2010
11:16 am
Josef, really outstanding, you had to go and ruin Thanks Giving dinner for the many of us who’ve always looked forward to Oyster dressing, up until now!
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
11:17 am
Until they figure out a way for an electric car to recharge itself from driving, they will have limited appeal, in my opinion.
The Last Boy Scout
November 24th, 2010
11:17 am
I will now extend my subscription to Motor Trend for three more years. Imagine a firm telling the grand master of horse puckie to shut up and read something for a change……love it….sober up Maha Rushie
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
11:18 am
Limbaugh opining about automotive engineering is like Paris Hilton opining about thermodynamics.
Actually, I think Paris is more qualified on her topic. She’s a lot hotter than Sarah Palin, for example. And rich too. Did I mention rich. I feel a bout of wealth envy coming on. Excuse me while I move closer to the couch. I having flashbacks of a bikini-clad lady eating a hamburger.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:20 am
“Until they figure out a way for an electric car to recharge itself from driving”
Not going to happen. What you are asking for is a perpetual motion machine, and those are not possible. But it should be possible to get some finite extension of range from a motion powered generator. But you’ll still have to recharge at some point.
I’m thinking that electric cars will have some limited appeal for city dwellers but for people like me who drive long distances there isn’t going to be any real apeals until they get them to a range more in line with gasoline cars – at least a 400 mile distance and a recharge time not significantly longer than it takes to refill a gas tank.
PinkoNeoConLibertarian
November 24th, 2010
11:21 am
Ouch.
Del
November 24th, 2010
11:22 am
Be among the first on the bleeding edge of technology and get your $7,500. tax credit compliments of the tax payers. Be a patriot…Government Motors and the UAW want you.
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
11:23 am
DEL
Just doing my job!
JohnnyReb
November 24th, 2010
11:23 am
Both Jay and Cynthia are pushing START today. Reports are Obama is using every waking moment pushing for ratification. Perhaps he called/email them.
As to the Volt, please direct your attention to the excellent article by George Will in the Sunday, Nov 14 hardcopy edition of the AJC.
El Jefe
November 24th, 2010
11:24 am
For a limited use car it is worthy. For a practical car – nope.
Copper cables – made in China.
Lithium batteries – made in China.
Rare earth magnets for the electric drive – made in China.
Wait, I think I see a pattern, who just bought 10% stake in the new GM…
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
11:25 am
Actually, regenerative brakes, solar panels, small-scale on-board power generators such as fuel cells, etc., are just a few of the things in store for future iterations of the electric car. And as for pure unadulterated raw torque from a dead stop, electric is it. Feel the power.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:25 am
“Be among the first on the bleeding edge of technology and get your $7,500″
I drove past a Ford dealer yesterday in NE GA who had a Ford Flex marked $8,000 off
DannyX
November 24th, 2010
11:27 am
“Wait, I think I see a pattern, who just bought 10% stake in the new GM…”
Well?? Who just bought 10% of GM?
Please, we’re waiting,,,,,,
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
11:31 am
“And as for pure unadulterated raw torque from a dead stop, electric is it.”
Volt –
Torque (lb-ft / Nm): 236 / 320
My 2010 Camaro 2SS -
Torque: 420 ft-lbs. @ 4600 rpm
You were saying?
Horsepower: 426 hp @ 5900 rpm
Torque: 420 ft-lbs. @ 4600 rpm
Del
November 24th, 2010
11:31 am
Going to secure and run errands…Y’all have a wonderful Thanksgiving and a safe one.
Soothsayer
November 24th, 2010
11:31 am
As novel as electric cars are, they unfortunately will never be more than a novelty.
Why? There simply is not enough lithium in the World to make a real dent in the World’s transport fleet.
As I’ve said many, many times on this and other blogs, hydrogen represents the only real hope we have of replacing fossil fuels.
Why? Hydrogen can easily be produced by anyone by electrolysis using common seawater, it will burn in the car you already have, it creates no pollution whatsoever, can be produced carbon-free by CSP solar generation, it’s production (from seawater) yields valuable by-products like chlorine gas and sodium hydroxide (lye).
We, our Nation and the World are wasting valuable time in this dead-end exercise.
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
11:34 am
This is a little sample of what’s coming to a state near you. Soon.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:35 am
“As I’ve said many, many times on this and other blogs, hydrogen represents the only real hope we have of replacing fossil fuels”
And I don’t think any one source is the answer. They all are going to have their place. At this point it doesn’t matter which one you use…ALL sources of energy take as much energy to produce as they provide. There is no net gain in energy.
Soothsayer
November 24th, 2010
11:38 am
TaxPayer: from your post
“Left untouched, to the irritation of other EU nations, is Ireland’s exceptionally low 12.5 percent tax rate on business profits. That rate is less than half the EU average and has helped to lure about 1,000 high-tech multinationals to Ireland, far more proportionally than any other European country.”
Notice who gets the free ride. Reference my post yesterday about U.S. tax avoidance by moving corporate “headquarters” to Ireland.
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
11:38 am
AC Propulsion’s tzero roadster is a reason to not give up on the electric vehicle. The tzero does 0 to 60 mph in 3.6 seconds, according to the company, and it does it on only 200 horsepower because of its light weight and torque.
The San Dimas, Calif.-based company says the tzero (pronounced “tee-zero,” not “chair-o”) has compared favorably in acceleration tests to Corvettes, Porsche 911s–and even a Ferrari F355, which it claims to have “out-accelerated…by eight car lengths” in one-eighth-mile drag races. If for nothing else, the tzero’s $220,000 sticker price puts it in exotic-car territory.
Don’t be angry with me and turn all red but I said electric. I did not limit my words to the Chevy Volt.
RB from Gwinnett
November 24th, 2010
11:39 am
Anybody figured out where the energy to recharge all these cars is going to come from when we can’t seem to power some states on a warm summer day?
Are you going to let them build nuclear power plants, pollute the earth with coal fired, kill some snail darters with hydro dams, or walk when the wind doesn’t blow enough to turn the mills?
Have you simple minded liberals even thought about this?
carlosgvv
November 24th, 2010
11:39 am
The problem with electric cars is that if they become common, power plants will have to produce much more electricity than they do now. Power plants are heavy polluters so I don’t see any environmental advantage to electric cars. Of course, with a country full of nucelar power plants, electric cars might make sense. However, it dosen’t seem that the American people want large numbers of nucelar power plants.
Dave R.
November 24th, 2010
11:39 am
“Limbaugh opining about automotive engineering is like Paris Hilton opining about thermodynamics.”
Or Jay opining about economics.
Or Hope & Change opining about the Constitution.
I could go on . . .
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:40 am
“Notice who gets the free ride. Reference my post yesterday about U.S. tax avoidance by moving corporate “headquarters” to Ireland”
Might want to do some checking into the Ireland bailout by the EU before you start crowing.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:41 am
“even thought about this?”
Yes
Soothsayer
November 24th, 2010
11:44 am
“And I don’t think any one source is the answer. They all are going to have their place. At this point it doesn’t matter which one you use…ALL sources of energy take as much energy to produce as they provide. There is no net gain in energy.”
Electric cars–specifically the batteries–represent energy storage. Just hydrogen represents energy storage.
Think about this: every square meter that sunlight falls on represents the equivalent of one Kilowatt. The sun falling on that square meter for one hour represents one Kilowatt-hour. Think of the power that could be generated using the Sun. It boggles the mind. This power can be stored in the form of electricity in a battery or (by electrolysis) as hydrogen.
Dave R.
November 24th, 2010
11:45 am
“What you are asking for is a perpetual motion machine, and those are not possible.”
Perhaps you might consider adding the following word to your definitive statement, Doggone: “today”.
As in, you don’t know a darned thing about what might happen in the future. ‘kay?
Dusty
November 24th, 2010
11:45 am
Josef, 11:11
Are you “drinking’” before lunch? What kind of Cajun,Ccreole, New Orleans, bayou man are you that won’t eat oysters?
You are no longer a pearl in MY oyster world!!
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
11:45 am
Electric cars have their place. Moving a few people over short distances, city driving, etc. But if you want stores to have furniture, groceries, books, they will come by gas powered trucks. That will remain the case for many years. How do you think they will deliver electric cars to all the dealerships? How do you think you will take the entire family to visit Grandma in Ohio? How will you pull your camper to the Smokies?
El Jefe
November 24th, 2010
11:45 am
With the large investment SAIC made in GM with the IPO, and the large “partnership” they have in building cars in China, how does the UAW feel about all those jobs in China? After all, the UAW is who profited most from the Government take over.
From CNBC – http://www.cnbc.com/id/39269829/GM_s_China_Syndrome – A right wing organization(just a joke)
GM, despite all its problems, is a quintessential American firm. Its future may increasingly be tied to succeeding in the booming Chinese auto market, but if the shots aren’t being called in Detroit, people won’t be happy. Americans won’t be happy. That said we are moving towards a world where foreign ownership in GM is a distinct possibility. Especially as Chinese firms grow their bottom lines and look to buy into undervalued foreign operations.
The SAIC interest in GM right now may not lead to anything, but the day of Chinese ownership in American auto firms is coming.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:51 am
“Electric cars–specifically the batteries–represent energy storage. Just hydrogen represents energy storage.”
But manufacturing the batteries is not energy free, and neither is the generation of the electricity you are storing. The equation holds no matter which source of energy you want…it takes at least as much energy to create an energy source as you get back in useable enerby.
“Think of the power that could be generated using the Sun. It boggles the mind.”
Yes it does, but even solar energy is not an energy-free source. At this point in our technology we do not have solar converters that are efficient enough to put directly onto an automobile. That means we have to build relatively weak solar power stations and then store and transmit that energy. It takes energy to create those solar collector systems and the electrical grid to transport that energy.
” This power can be stored in the form of electricity in a battery or (by electrolysis) as hydrogen”
Again, both of which TAKE energy to CREATE energy (or store it)
There is no net gain in energy.
DannyX
November 24th, 2010
11:51 am
And yet, as we speak, Georgia Power ratepayers are paying for a brand spanking new nuclear plant.
In a wonderful socialist ponzi scheme that keeps the ratepayer as the loser on the bottom.
This wonderful new plant has the ratepayer doing the job of the “free market” company. The “free-market” company and investors get all the profits and no risk. 11.5% guaranteed!
BTW, how much does Georgia’s socialist give-a-way to Kia amount to per car?
Jay
November 24th, 2010
11:51 am
Tommytwotone is actually JohnnyOneNote, better known as our old big-talking friend NRB, the Timothy McVeigh acolyte.
He is now banned again.
Kamchak
November 24th, 2010
11:52 am
Or Jay opining about economics.
Or Hope & Change opining about the Constitution.
Or failed county politicians opining about anything.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:53 am
“Perhaps you might consider adding the following word to your definitive statement, Doggone: “today”.”
Perpetual motion machines will never be possible. No matter how hard you try, you lose more energy than you can create.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
11:54 am
“Tommytwotone is actually JohnnyOneNote, better known as our old friend NRB”
Yeah, he gave that away by how he addressed me. He can’t help it.
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
11:55 am
JAY
Oh, why ban Tommy? I was just getting ready to reminisce about the halcyon days gone by at the Hofbrau, Ken’s Tavern and the Lindbergh Waffle House!
StJ
November 24th, 2010
11:55 am
“Just remember: driving and Oxycontin don’t mix.” ROFL.
Ol’ Rush was begging for that one, wasn’t he? (Not that I’m a Government Motors fan.)
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
11:55 am
Nothing is free. Even if you had a car that ran on seawater, where will you get it? It would still have to be transported to the majority of US states. And it would have to be treated and filtered to rid it of impurities. If it ran on freshwater, what about the water shortage that exists in every part of the US? Will you decide to drink it or drive you car? Have you seen the rise of water bills that come to your house?What do you think is going to happen to the cost of water if we start using it as a fuel?
DannyX
November 24th, 2010
11:58 am
“The SAIC interest in GM right now may not lead to anything, but the day of Chinese ownership in American auto firms is coming.”
Still waiting for an answer. Oh wait, it turns out you were exaggerating.
You turned a 1% Chinese share into a 10% stake. Are you the same person that calculated the cost of Obama’s last trip overseas?
Soothsayer
November 24th, 2010
11:59 am
Doggone: you’re preaching to the choir. My only point is that their is “unlimited” power in the form of sunlight that we don’t currently use to it’s full extent.
As the years go by and fossil fuels become ever more scarce, we will have no choice except to utilize the energy from the Sun. Otherwise we will have to give up our way of life.
Why aren’t we doing this now? Because BigOil doesn’t want to do anything to upset the Status Quo of their making $billions on the remaining fossil fuels.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
November 24th, 2010
12:00 pm
Well, I hinted to the missus about putting some of that fromage Dusty talks about in our turkey tomorrow and she asked me if I’d been sampling the goods at work again. I don’t know what fromage is but I reckon it must include lots of salt and pepper. Anyhow, I was just about drooling when Dusty wrote about it last night.
So the topic is “Motorhead takes King of the Dittoheads to school.” I guess this is the day for it. This josef nix was about to take the two-tone guy to school this a.m., and I don’t mean in the good way. If it had of kept going somebody was going to get hurt bad.
I wonder if they make this Volt in a pickup. That’s about the only way I’d try one. I like the feeling of setting high above all the other drivers on the road.
Have a good p.m. everybody.
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
12:02 pm
I think most of us heard the tick tick tick of tommytwotone’s time.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:03 pm
“My only point is that their is “unlimited” power in the form of sunlight that we don’t currently use to it’s full extent.”
That’s because we can’t…yet. We just haven’t developed the converter technology to make the best use of solar energy. The cost to develop a solar power station is still WAY out of proportion to the amount of energy you get back. On a cost per kilowatt basis, it’s still cheaper to build a more conventional power station – and that include nuclear.
Try a little harder, know-it-all
November 24th, 2010
12:03 pm
Perpetual motion machines will never be possible. No matter how hard you try, you lose more energy than you can create.
A iron disc levitated and rotated in a vacuum is in perpetual motion and is considered a perpetual motion machine. No friction at all. This simple machine has been known about for decades except to your typical ill-informed creationist/global-warming denier/willfully ignorant types.
Dusty
November 24th, 2010
12:05 pm
Who is Tommytwotone? Must be another appointed Dittohead. Jay is getting good at this namecalling business …DittoHead, anti-Obama Jihadist etc.etc.. He better watch out. He may get banned!
Palin fan
November 24th, 2010
12:08 pm
Phu-leez. the Government Motors as Car of the Year?
This just shows how the Obama-loving lamestream media bias goes all the way to even to car magazines.
Thank God the Constitution allows Freedom of Speech and Rush is around to expose the true fax despite Obama’s attempts to kill free speech.
This White House is in the hands of anti-American idiots.
Dusty
November 24th, 2010
12:08 pm
Happy Thanksgiving, RedNeck…….yeah, be sure and put a lot of salt and pepper in the fromage. Kinda flat without it…
Mick
November 24th, 2010
12:09 pm
Perfect place for an electric car? The florida keys or the hawaiian islands, makes perfect sense…
Ramguy
November 24th, 2010
12:09 pm
So the dope addict known as Limbaugh or in some circles is know as Limpaugh know fancies himself and expert on automobiles. Hahahaha that is rick. Anybody who listens to this idiot is just plain stupid. There’s no other way to put it.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:10 pm
“A iron disc levitated and rotated in a vacuum is in perpetual motion and is considered a perpetual motion machine.”
but you have to generate the vacuum, create the equipment to contain it, and create the iron disk, and you have to have an energy source to set the disk moving. And as a stand-alone curiosity it has no real purpose. Once you attached it to something to capture the energy of the motion, you are introducing heat and friction into the equation and those return it as a source of energy to the same state as other sources of energy. It takes at least as much energy to create energy as you get back in usable energy.
Disco Inferno
November 24th, 2010
12:12 pm
The Volt may well be the car ‘o the year but Motor Trend would have had a stronger case had they waited a year or so for the car to be stress tested in the real world.
A cynic might think Motor Trend just signed a lucrative ad contract with GM. More likely they were just overcome by a bit of adolescent exuberance. Sorta like the Nobel committee giving the Peace Price to a brand new, untested U.S. president.
Mick
November 24th, 2010
12:13 pm
**Rush is around to expose the true fax despite Obama’s attempts to kill free speech.**
Come on down here to florida my palin fan, there is some great land for sale west of krome that you can buy for about a dollar an acre. It’s kinda swampy and has some big critters but I’ll throw in the mosquitters for nothing…come on down
Southern Comfort
November 24th, 2010
12:13 pm
Limbaugh opining about automotive engineering is like Paris Hilton opining about thermodynamics.
Just couldn’t leave well enough alone, could you Jay? First, there was the Palin bashing, then the GOP bashing, and now you’re bashing the Grand Poobah??? I hope you emptied your inbox, because you’re about to receive a lot of fan email, and not the good kind.
I guess they were wrong
November 24th, 2010
12:13 pm
Maybe Rush exceeded the weight limit so the foot pounds of torque didn’t help LOL
Fred Bastiat
November 24th, 2010
12:18 pm
20,000 dollars worth of junk sold for 40,000 dollars with tax-payer’s kicking in 7000 dollars.
Good job.
Typical government work.
Resorting to personal attacks after facing reality,
typical progressive reaction.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
12:19 pm
As much as we hate it, gas and oil are not going anywhere. 95% of all motor vehicles in the World use gas engines. There are millions of vehicles on the road and they represent a huge monetary investment. These cars and trucks cannot be abandoned even if other fuels become available. Can you take a $20,000-$40,000 loss on your current vehicles and then replace them with electric vehicles that will cost more than the cars they will replace? How many years would it take the US car companies to make millions of electric cars needed by Americans. The shear numbers of replacement cars and dollars needed would be unfathomable.
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
12:19 pm
DUSTY
Yeah, I know I’m a heretic…
REDNECK
Well, bless his heart…
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
12:19 pm
Car of the year? A little 4 seater, base price $41k, $14k more than a Prius. Range in EV mode; only 25 to 50 miles. Curb weight of 3781 lbs makes it a slug off the line; 0-60 mph in 8.9 seconds. Don’t be pulling out in front of semis.
Impressive engineering? Yes. Car of the year? Hardly.
BTW, there is a lot of extra energy expended to build the battery pack and motor. Anybody seen a carbon payback analysis?
Try a little harder, know-it-all
November 24th, 2010
12:20 pm
but you have to generate the vacuum, create the equipment to contain it, and create the iron disk, …
Yes. Keen explanation of the obvious. No machine spontaneously generates out of vapor. Machines are build by humans – duh.
Energy into the machine = Energy in perpetuity (no loss, no gain)
a.k.a. despite your pedantic qualifications, it’s perpetual motion machine by any definition.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:21 pm
“As much as we hate it, gas and oil are not going anywhere. 95% of all motor vehicles in the World use gas engines”
I agree. The best chance we have right now is to find some other source of energy that can be used in existing engine. We’ll probably have to take a mileage and power hit to do it, but I think it will be done eventually.
Mick
November 24th, 2010
12:21 pm
Bada
It’s doable, even though there has to be a transition period. Subtract 100 years – how many cars were on the road in 1910?
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:22 pm
“it’s perpetual motion machine by any definition.”
Has it ever been done? And if it has, did it run for eternity?
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
12:25 pm
Doggone
Eternity being relative, of course!
Jefferson
November 24th, 2010
12:26 pm
Gas should priced by the vehicle that consumes it, bad mpg – higher price, why should people who conserve subsidize the wasteful? Pay to play hog.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:29 pm
“Eternity being relative, of course!”
Yep, and appropos of nothing – except that it is sort of energy related – have you heard this one: a computer’s attention span is only as long as it’s power cord
Fred
November 24th, 2010
12:29 pm
Dusty
November 24th, 2010
11:05 am
Now let’s talk TURKEY. (No, @@, not that one.) Anybody for oyster dressing?
++++++++++++
I’m about to go get my last few items and brine my bird. Oyster dressing? Can you post or send me the recipe? I’m still trying to decide what kind to make………
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
12:29 pm
This story reminds me of a friend of mine who had a business. He decided it’d be a good idea to get his business written up in a trade magazine. He placed a couple of phone calls and got pointed in the right direction. He was talking to somebody at the magazine and making small talk and then it came time to get down to business. He asked if it would be possible to get an article written about his business and the quick reply was, “How many ads have you bought in our magazine?”. He said he hadn’t bought any up to that point. In a roundabout way, he was told it might be a good idea to buy some ads. So he started buying ads and 3-4 months later, out come the people from the magazine, to do a write-up on his business.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:31 pm
“Pay to play hog”
the problem with that is that we don’t, yet, have the technology to make all vehicles equally fuel efficient. So you would, in effect, be taxing consumers more for the cost of transporting the goods they consume.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:34 pm
“So he started buying ads and 3-4 months later, out come the people from the magazine, to do a write-up on his business”
there’s another side to that, though, Hillbilly. By advertising you get consumer interest and that interest might translate to requests to the magazine to know more about the business. And it might be difficult to prove which is cause and which is effect, between the advertising and the write-up.
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
12:36 pm
Doggone
That’s a good one!
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:37 pm
Josef – yep, I’ve always like it!
bart
November 24th, 2010
12:38 pm
Good for Mr. Lassa. It’s time people stopped letting Limbaugh bully them. Are you listening Republican Party?
Fred
November 24th, 2010
12:39 pm
I missed that there was another blog up while watching the fracas below lol.
I’ll have to look into the Volt. I checked out the Smart Car but wasn’t really impressed by it. I didn’t think it’s mileage was all that great, but the price sure was. $12,000. I need a third car. My Ram 4X4 only gets 10 MPG. While I need it when I do a job, for every day running around that’s a bit much. I wouldn’t call myself a tree hugger but if I can do something to ease the inevitable strain we place on the environment I try to do it. Especially when it save me money. Hybrids don’t really save money though when you factor in their high purchase price.
Lassa sure ate Limbaugh a new ass though didn’t he?
Soothsayer
November 24th, 2010
12:40 pm
BADA BING: here is a great article about the future of fossil fuels
Our cars may not be going anywhere but the substance we power them with certainly is.
By the way, everyone in America should spend at 1/2 hour on the MarketOracle.org site everyday so you at least have rudimentary knowledge about economics.
DannyX
November 24th, 2010
12:42 pm
I think its fair to add Red State Texas to the list of troubled states. Texas? Republican darling Texas?
Oh, my.
At least California can now change course. They kicked the Republican Party out of the Governor’s office.
Jack
November 24th, 2010
12:42 pm
Motor Trend is on somebody’s payroll. I wonder whose.
Real American
November 24th, 2010
12:43 pm
How can middle and low class whites follow this high school drop out? This man is Anti American had the President listen to this man, millions more suppliers would have been out of work, more plants would have closed, yet you idiots support this ex radio DJ, and he make millions spreading hate and lies.
President Hussein
November 24th, 2010
12:43 pm
I wonder how much of the $7500 “federal tax credit” is directly bankrolled into the auto union pension slush fund…..
jt
November 24th, 2010
12:43 pm
The Ta Ta Nano is better.
No government goons, stolen tax-payer money, or precious metals involved.
AND,………. with a retail sale value at 2500 US dollars……………………EVEN poor people can afford it.
Performance and specifications
Performance: The 2-cylinder 624 cc engine – delivering 35 PS @ 5250 rpm and a torque of 48 Nm @ 3000 rpm – enables the car to have a top speed of 105 kmph and negotiate inclines with a gradeability of 30%.
Fuel efficiency : 23.6 km/litre, certified by the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) under mandated test conditions, which is the highest for any petrol car in India.(that is around 70 mpg.)
For some reason, our government will not allow this automobile in our “free” market. It must be those evil capitilists.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
12:44 pm
“Gas should priced by the vehicle that consumes it, bad mpg – higher price, why should people who conserve subsidize the wasteful? Pay to play hog.”
Hey, I can handle paying more for my vroom vroom. And fat people pay more for airline travel, unhealthy people pay more for health insurance, people who live in crappy neighborhoods pay more for police, etc. Life is all about choices, folks, and you should have to pay for the ones you make, right? I can dig it.
Soothsayer
November 24th, 2010
12:45 pm
Doggone, cursor down to the photo under Concentrating Solar Power
This type of power plant can be built for about half the cost of nuclear and is approaching parity with conventional power plants. Not to mention they don’t burn any fuel so the future operating costs are small.
Rockerbabe
November 24th, 2010
12:46 pm
Go Motor Trend! Thanks for give the fat ba$tard criminal doper a verbal shellacking. Just goes to show you that running your mouth without the facts and a little first hand investigation warrents a stern rebuke from a group of people who are actually experts at what they do. Thanks much Motor Trend.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
12:47 pm
I have to say I absolutely love the response. What’s that you say about spineless? TAKE THAT.
Southern Comfort
November 24th, 2010
12:48 pm
For some reason, our government will not allow this automobile in our “free” market. It must be those evil capitilists.
The Tata Nano wouldn’t survive a collision with a Smart car. Safety is one of the major hurdles that car has to jump. But I’m sure you just think it’s the evil government and it’s evil regulations. It doesn’t matter that those safety regulations are there for an important reason.
Southern Comfort
November 24th, 2010
12:50 pm
Introducing the Tata Nano
http://milkyourmoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/tata-nano-map.jpg
joe
November 24th, 2010
12:51 pm
Recall the old ad “baseball, hotdogs, apple pie and Chevrolet”, I prefer football, hamburgers, chocolate cake and Ford.
marko osgoode
November 24th, 2010
12:51 pm
Rush and some of his dittheads are high school grads. Keep that in mind when you dare to question their credibility.
666
November 24th, 2010
12:51 pm
Pleased to meet you. Hope you guessed my name. Being Rush Limbaugh is the nature of my game.
Chris D.
November 24th, 2010
12:52 pm
The Chevy Volt is the Edsel! Since the car has high voltage wiring running throughout the chassis, there is a high probability that if someone where to get in a crash that severs any of the lines, the passengers in the car can be electrocuted. Also GM is having to go around the country and do these “special” training sessions for Emergency repsonse teams, because you can not safely cut open the body without also hitting these high voltage lines. What a BOONDOGGLE!
TaxPayer
November 24th, 2010
12:53 pm
The Tata Nano wouldn’t survive a collision with a Smart car.
And in an overpopulated area, some might consider that a good thing.
belinda
November 24th, 2010
12:54 pm
bortz=excrement
kayaker 71
November 24th, 2010
12:54 pm
To be “successful”, an automobile has to sell quite a few units and there is no indication that the Volt will catch on with the buying public. It’s “mileage” is limited to just 40 miles before the gasoline motor kicks in to charge the batteries again and allow the car to continue. However, with most commutes going at about 35 miles round trip, it could catch on. With a gas tank that holds 9.3 gal, the max (@35mi/gal) would extend the trip to 355 miles total, not bad if you consider the cost of going that far. It is charged with an outlet in your garage and the utility charge has to be cranked in for the total. Sticker price of 40K might scare the average buyer away, however. And if they make it look like a toaster, joe public just will not opt for it. But we have to start somewhere and it looks like a good beginning but it’s going to have to come down in price for the average buyer to afford it, even with the 7.5K tax rebate.
Charles
November 24th, 2010
12:55 pm
40 grand for this car… who in their right mind would pay this unless you are an eco-nut? I’ll stick with my 40mpg Corolla!
Fred
November 24th, 2010
12:55 pm
Site your source please Chris D. Definitely something I would need to know before I even thought about buying one.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
12:58 pm
“Not to mention they don’t burn any fuel so the future operating costs are small”
Yes I’ve seen arrays like that. But there are still the manufacturing costs of the equipment, that takes energy. And operating costs are smaller, but there are still issues with them. They aren’t suited to all climates, they are mostly desert specific. And the mirrors have to be kept clean, or their light transference degrades…and keeping them clean is not an easy thing to do in a desert. And their weather durablity has yet to be truly tested. Deserts can kick up hellcious storms, it remains to be seen if the mirrors can survive that.
And they have that added disadvantage not experienced by conventional power stations: they are useless at night
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
12:58 pm
jt
Call home! The Bruin needs to talk to you!
Regulations R For Wimps
November 24th, 2010
12:58 pm
It doesn’t matter that those safety regulations are there for an important reason.
You mean like the stickers on pushmowers warning the user not to pick it up by the edge and use it as a hedge trimmer. Those stickers were put there to make sure Republicans have fingers to use when they go to the voting boothes. They look so silly pecking away with their nose and there were too many complaints about dead animals whenever they resorted to using their toes.
Rightwing Troll
November 24th, 2010
1:00 pm
Some serious rocket science being bandied about in here today… Once again not a single solitary “conservative” here can step up and refudiate “conservative” lunacy…
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
1:00 pm
Soco “The Tata Nano wouldn’t survive a collision with a Smart car”
Have you watched the “IRT: World’s Deadliest Roads” show? It’s bout some of the American Ice Road Truckers driving loads on some hellacious Himalyan roads in India. They are driving Ta Ta trucks that have a steel base frame but the upper structure is WOOD.
Rightwing Troll
November 24th, 2010
1:02 pm
“40 grand for this car… who in their right mind would pay this unless you are an eco-nut? I’ll stick with my 40mpg Corolla!”
And I’ll happily stick with my 11mpg 96′ Ford Bronco.
Motorhead takes King of the Dittoheads to school - Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) : Hr Articles
November 24th, 2010
1:02 pm
[...] Motorhead takes King of the Dittoheads to school – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) [...]
Chris D.
November 24th, 2010
1:02 pm
Here’s a link to GM “proactive” emergency repsonse guide…As this is written by GM, it really sugar coats the dangers. But you can at least see how all thsi high voltage wiring runs throught the car. The other think I forgot about is the car has a gas tank…High Voltage and gasoline DO not play well together either!
http://boronextrication.com/2010/11/2011-chevrolet-volt-first-responder-labels/
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:02 pm
Sorry Guys but most of Bookman’s bloggers- Specs of blue amongst a Sea of Red
Dave R.
November 24th, 2010
1:03 pm
“Or failed county politicians opining about anything.”
“Failed”, Kamchak? Whatever do you mean?
Just because you “fail” to make any logical or factual arguments on this blog, don’t try to transfer that failure of yours to me.
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
1:03 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gQoI1pd4mQ
emo
November 24th, 2010
1:03 pm
Thanks, kayaker, I read the whole thread looking for someone who knew the Volt was not just an electric car.
And he says not one has been sold? Of course not, it’s not on the market yet. As a reader, I know if Motor Trend is in the tank for anyone, it’s BMW, not GM. But look out, BMW is working on an electric, as are all manufacturers.
There are drawbacks to any concentration of power: gas we know, electricity is hard to generate and store, hydrogen as of now comes from hydrocarbon sources, not seawater, natural gas prices are subject to market forces. But fossil fuels will not be around forever.
Doggone/GA
November 24th, 2010
1:03 pm
Time to get out of the house for a while…be back later. Dreamers, keep working on those perpetual motion machines. At the very least, it’ll keep you out of trouble.
Watcher...
November 24th, 2010
1:04 pm
Ten years from now let’s see if Limbaugh is correct.
Ray
November 24th, 2010
1:05 pm
rush is just pissed because he could never even fit in the car.
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:06 pm
I love how you take bits of the article and leave out the 40k price tag. To use the tired old phrase, in this economy, until the Volt or any other vehicle is in the same price range as comparable vehicles then all wonderful page filling statistics are just that.
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
1:06 pm
Have you watched the “IRT: World’s Deadliest Roads” show? It’s bout some of the American Ice Road Truckers driving loads on some hellacious Himalyan roads in India. They are driving Ta Ta trucks that have a steel base frame but the upper structure is WOOD.
I wouldn’t get out of the electric chair to get into one of those trucks.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
1:07 pm
Rush made his opinion on the basis of knowing NOTHING about the car, except that OMG ITS ELECTRIC. ELECTRIC = BAD! Whatever arguments you have against electric cars, you really should look at it from a perspective of would you buy one? If not, then fine, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t be car of the year just because you don’t think the cost is worth it.
Southern Comfort
November 24th, 2010
1:08 pm
<i.You mean like the stickers on pushmowers warning the user not to pick it up by the edge and use it as a hedge trimmer.
Anytime you see those warnings, that usually means that someone somewhere has done exactly what the warning sticker says not to do.
Doggone
I’ve seen the show on the tv guide, but haven’t had a chance to watch any episodes. Tata tried to set up the Nano for import years ago, but they would have had to build almost an entirely new car for it to meet US requirements.
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:09 pm
As stated before though, fossil fuels will run out eventually just like rational thoughts about supply and demand.
ski_diva
November 24th, 2010
1:09 pm
Can Rush actually fit into a Volt? Maybe that’s his issue.
Southern Comfort
November 24th, 2010
1:10 pm
messed up me slantees on that one…
pat
November 24th, 2010
1:10 pm
So? That’s his opinion, now he has to like the same cars as you? and it would be helpful if the car had actually been sold. I happen to know alot about the Volt. It is impressive in it’s application of the hybrid technology, but it has a lot of quirks too. Certainly much better options for car of year. Hyundai Sonata for one is a better choice.
The Volt requires 14 hours to charge (4 hours at 240 volts, but that is bad for the batteries), cannot climb steep grades with out preparation, and the gas engine is very weak and relies heavily on the electric motors.
I could go on, but I get Motor Trend and they haven’t actually release their car of the year. That should come early ‘11.
Moderate Line
November 24th, 2010
1:11 pm
Wow! Big news.
Here is the basic argument.
Motor Trend – Have you ever rode in one of these cars? Good point.
Limbaugh – How many of these cars have been sold and have a proven track record? Good point.
Motor Trend is more of initial of an intial reaction and is somewhat subjective. JD Powers or consumer reports is better at judging whether a car is really worth buying. The Cheverlot brand is not a top brand. Ford is much higher.
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings/quality-ratings-by-brand/sortcolumn-1/descending/page-/
Adam
November 24th, 2010
1:13 pm
pat: If you don’t agree that’s fine. But if you say that it’s the END of Motor Trend and they have no credibility? That’s resorting to attack because you disagree. There’s no call for it, and it is pretty clear that his reasons for hating it have to do with his feelings about GM, which he hates because of the auto bailout, which he hates because he hates Democrats, etc.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
1:13 pm
“Tata tried to set up the Nano for import years ago, but they would have had to build almost an entirely new car for it to meet US requirements.”
There is a part of me that gets a little bit miffed by this. You see, if idiots want to drive around in a little POS car that can be put out of commission if it hits a bug, then I say let them do it and decrease the surplus population. So much time and money wasted warning against or even outright preventing stupid people from doing idiotic things that go against standard common sense….so they can survive to breed and produce a new generation of idiots.
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:14 pm
Adam
I, nor no one else said it couldn’t be car of the year. I’m sure all the stats are legit and to me are impressive in terms of gas mileage.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
1:17 pm
So much time and money wasted warning against or even outright preventing stupid people from doing idiotic things that go against standard common sense….so they can survive to breed and produce a new generation of idiots.
Although I agree with the basic point, that labels are too many and common sense is not so common, I don’t think building cars that would be put out of commission by a small impact is a good idea. Smart people want value for their money.
Of course labels like “Caution: Hot” wouldn’t even exist if courts didn’t award lawsuit money to anyone making a complaint that “oh well they didn’t warn me!” Of course not, IT’S COFFEE. It’s SUPPOSED to be hot. And you’re an idiot that won money for being an idiot. Congrats.
WinchLock
November 24th, 2010
1:17 pm
I don’t care what either Rush or Motor Trend has to say regarding the Chevy Volt; I still think it looks ugly.
Granny Godzilla
November 24th, 2010
1:18 pm
Would Limbaugh fit behind the wheel of a Volt?
Adam
November 24th, 2010
1:19 pm
I, nor no one else said it couldn’t be car of the year. I’m sure all the stats are legit and to me are impressive in terms of gas mileage.
You and no one else in this forum. And perhaps no one else with a rational brain. But Rush is the person I was referring to. It’s pretty clear he thinks it shouldn’t have been made car of the year.
Greg Mendel
November 24th, 2010
1:19 pm
Rush Limbaugh is no longer the go-to authority on automotive technology or anything else. That would be Lindsay Lohan.
Jefferson
November 24th, 2010
1:20 pm
The real point is who can be the pettiest neocon around? Nothing good to say about anything hopeful. More of the same, quite child like pettiness.
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:20 pm
Adam @ 1:13- Agreed, coming from a Republican
kayaker 71
November 24th, 2010
1:21 pm
If you compare many of the models of popular cars on the market to the Volt, the electric car comes up wanting in several ways. First of all, the desires of the public for as good a ride as they can get for the money will out weigh their “green” obligation to the environment any day. The shopping public will immediately say,”What can I get for a comparable 40K”. A nice Tundra pickup, a GMC Yukon, a Ford Navigator, any number of so called “luxury” rides for the same price.
Compare the fuel savings. At a once a week fillup for a Tundra at about $55/wk, the average fuel cost for the Tundra would be about 2860/yr. Compare that with the Volt….. $20/wk or about $1040/yr. You can’t tell me that the average Joe Sixpack is going to buy a Chevy Volt to save himself 150/month and sacrifice his nice ride. Ain’t gonna happen. And where did the government get the right to spend tax payer dollars to allow GMC to develop a questionable car to sell to a doubting public? You might not like Rush but he has a point.
Mitzymy
November 24th, 2010
1:21 pm
I’m just glad someone had the cajonies to talk back to Rush, and not rush out with an apology.
Bubba
November 24th, 2010
1:21 pm
MT doesn’t exactly have a spotless record with its ‘car of the year.’ Past winners include the PT Cruiser, Chevy Malibu, Chrysler 300, Ford Thunderbird and Dodge Caravan, among other less-than-stellar motorcars. On the other hand, the Volt got impressive reviews from both Car and Driver and Road & Track, which have more credibility than MT in my humble opinion. But as C&D pointed out, it’s a $40,000-plus compact car that can’t even be used as the main vehicle in most families.
Mr. Snarky
November 24th, 2010
1:23 pm
Wooo…hooo! Serves Limbaugh right for talking out his ass as usual.
Get Real
November 24th, 2010
1:24 pm
Looks like the Nissan Leaf gets twice the miles per charge for about $10K less in price……..interesting
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:26 pm
The car certainly has a lot of things to work out before it can ever sell realistically in volume. Rush is no judge of that, he does like the money and ratings though.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
1:26 pm
“I don’t think building cars that would be put out of commission by a small impact is a good idea. Smart people want value for their money.”
I am smart….I want value for my money….I would not buy, at any price, a tiny car that appeared to be unsafe given the area traffic and road conditions. But….if dummies and cheap people want to put their lives at risk…why not? Recall that they made the Geo Metro in a convertible…essentially two folding chairs in a box with an umbrella! Sure it passed safety standards, but if you have ever seen one out on I75 it would make you shudder – which is one reason why the thought of the Ta Ta not even being that safe makes me wonder how many people have died in them so far.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
1:26 pm
Before you buy a Volt, you better sit down with a calculator. Unless you are a serious tree hugger, you may not want to make that jump yet. If you have a newer car with many payments left, you are going to lose in the sell or trade in value. Then you will pay a hefty price for the Volt. You will still have tires and maintainence the same as a conventional car. No savings there. If you have an older, paid for car that gets decent mileage, you can drive for years using expensive gas and still save money over buying an electric car. Also, for you tree huggers, the Volt has been literally shipped around the World for various assemblies and battery installation, the carbon offset would take years to recoup.
Mr. Snarky
November 24th, 2010
1:29 pm
Would Limbaugh fit in a Volt? I doubt it.
Hankie Aron
November 24th, 2010
1:29 pm
Kayaker- Thank you, very informative
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
1:30 pm
Mea culpa, my last sentence should have stated the Prius, not the Volt.
Regulations R For Wimps
November 24th, 2010
1:32 pm
Look here! It’s AngryRedMarsWoman’s birthday present from TaTa. The card just says “TaTa” in it.
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
1:32 pm
The age of the American public is getting older and has been for a while. I spent many years working in car dealerships and I learned what the number one thing is that older people look for, when they buy a car. Anybody know what that is?
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
1:34 pm
“number one thing is that older people look for, when they buy a car. Anybody know what that is?”
sex?
Regulations R For Wimps
November 24th, 2010
1:34 pm
I’m just glad someone had the cajonies to talk back to Rush, and not rush out with an apology
No Republican that I’ve ever heard of would do such a disgraceful thing.
False Evidence Appearing Real (FEAR)
November 24th, 2010
1:37 pm
Finally!!! Flush Flapjaw had it coming…too, too, funny.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
1:37 pm
What I want to know about the Volt is……how many cupholders does it have?
I hope I heard wrong
November 24th, 2010
1:38 pm
AngryRedMarsWoman@1:13 pm
There is a part of me that gets a little bit miffed by this. You see, if idiots want to drive around in a little POS car that can be put out of commission if it hits a bug, then I say let them do it and decrease the surplus population. So much time and money wasted warning against or even outright preventing stupid people from doing idiotic things that go against standard common sense….so they can survive to breed and produce a new generation of idiots.
—————————————————————–
I hope you include your kids and/or grandkids in that remark if they were to get in the car.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
1:40 pm
If a woman owned two of the Indian cars, could she claim that she had the best set of TaTas in town?
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
1:41 pm
“I hope you include your kids and/or grandkids in that remark if they were to get in the car.”
My son would not purchase such a vehicle. But assuming he did, I have to say that I can protect him from only so much for so long — at some point a person has to start making their own choices and paying the price if they make bad ones. I do feel fairly confident that I am raising him to make better choices than to purchase an obviously unsafe vehicle.
When Hell Freezes Over
November 24th, 2010
1:43 pm
If the car is so damn great, why do the taxpayers have to subsidize it? Can’t Obama Motors sell their “Car of the Year”? Anything put together by union goons can’t be THAT great. It is nothing more than a novelty. Hang in there, Rush, and keep telling the truth – even though there isn’t a lib/dem with enough sense to see it!
Jimmy62
November 24th, 2010
1:45 pm
Does seem strange to call a car that no one can buy yet “Car of the Year.” The Oscars require that a movie actually be released before it can be considered for an Oscar, which is why you have movies showing in like 3 theaters in December, then released widely a month or two later.
JohnnyReb
November 24th, 2010
1:46 pm
Where do they sell the tickets to Fantasy Land you Lefties enjoy? As to the challenge of no Conservatives posting a worthy rebuttal, please see my previous post referencing the George Will article on the Volt in last Sunday’s AJC. I searched for a link, but can’t find one.
Limbaugh only stated the obvious. The Volt will not be financially successful, even if someone in the administration got to the Motor Trend guy. The car is only on being built to satisfy the rabbid tree huggers. Obama supports it to satisfy that same group, aka, political payback. The price is ridiculous even with the rebate taken from the pockets of taxpayers. It will not be available in 44 states. And, to top off the green saga of the day, 25% of hybrid vehicles sold have been purchased by the Barry administration. There is no market for them.
The government should stay out of “green technology” else it will be screwed up like everything else it touches.
Rightwing Troll
November 24th, 2010
1:48 pm
Soooo…. this 7500.00 tax credit is for the Volt ONLY? Or for electric cars? I wonder what dr. shopping Rush Pillbo thinks of the Tesla?
I hope I heard wrong
November 24th, 2010
1:48 pm
Jimmy62@1:45 pm
Kind of like our yet to be seated elected officials
Ragnar Danneskjöld
November 24th, 2010
1:51 pm
I see a Nobel peace prize in GM’s future, and maybe a Pulitzer for Motor Trend. But nobody will get any economics prizes for the taxpayer-subsidized loser. Forecast here – second year sales will approximate zero, sales terminate when the Volt drags GM back into bankruptcy.
I hope I heard wrong
November 24th, 2010
1:51 pm
Linsay Lohan is the new spokesperson for the ‘Smart’ car it was a tossup between her and Paris Hilton
kayaker 71
November 24th, 2010
1:53 pm
Obama Motors doesn’t know much more about the car business that it does about running the country. Billions of dollars of tax payer money invested in some questionable car that the public doesn’t want. And they are giving a tax rebate to try to get you to buy it so the average taxpayer is subsidizing the purchase of someone else’s car!! Such a deal. Is this the way Ford Motor Company gets repaid by the government for not accepting bailout money and continuing to produce a responsible product that is effectively challenging the foreign market? But corporate success is not what counts in Bozoland, is it?
moonbat betty
November 24th, 2010
1:54 pm
Every driving American should be required to buy a Volt by the year 2012.
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
1:56 pm
Hell Freezes says “Anything put together by union goons can’t be THAT great.”
Well, if you call people who work hard and have pride in their work “goons” then you really havne’t met very many of those hard working people, now have you?
Jimmy62 says “Does seem strange to call a car that no one can buy yet “Car of the Year.”
I completely agree. Why should it be “Car of the Year” if I can’t even buy one!?
BADA BING says ‘If a woman owned two of the Indian cars, could she claim that she had the best set of TaTas in town?”
I would hope she could proudly state such.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
1:57 pm
Does the Indian company make boats also? Everyone knows the best thing to do with Tatas is to go motorboating.
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
1:58 pm
“Every driving American should be required to buy a Volt by the year 2012.”
That’s the plan. If they can mandate purchase of health care insurance, they can mandate purchase of a car.
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
2:01 pm
“Everyone knows the best thing to do with Tatas is to go motorboating.”
Absolutely. Especially topless Tatas.
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
2:01 pm
Pennsylvanian said ” If they can mandate purchase of health care insurance, they can mandate purchase of a car”
I was reading too fast, I thought you said “Health CAR Insurance”
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
2:01 pm
“Every driving American should be required to buy a Volt by the year 2012.”
And the evil rich should pay higher taxes to subsidize the purchase for “those less fortunate among us”.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
2:01 pm
What magazine would I have to buy to see the ‘TaTas of the Year’?
stw
November 24th, 2010
2:02 pm
Wonder if Todd Lassa is a conservative or a bleeding heart ultra left wing lib? Todd, you’ve got class, only problem is that it’s all LOW CLASS !!
Adam
November 24th, 2010
2:02 pm
kayaker 71:
Get Real: Looks like the Nissan Leaf gets twice the miles per charge for about $10K less in price……..interesting
Fair point! This is the kind of discussion to have when it comes to cars, not “who got bailed out.”
JohnnyReb: even if someone in the administration got to the Motor Trend guy
This is what I’m talking about. C’mon, really? Motor trend is a leftist conspiracy now? Why? I can only think it’s because it’s GM + Electric car = LEFTIES!
kayaker 71: Obama Motors doesn’t know much more about the car business that it does about running the country.
No such company exists.
Also could everyone please stop with the “Rush can’t fit in a Volt” thing. There are many more substantive arguments you can make as to why he has his ridiculous opinion.
Oh yeah and the mandated car buying, you’re full of crap there. Way to go fearmongering!
Adam
November 24th, 2010
2:04 pm
Sorry, this on got cut out of my last response:
kayaker 71: You can’t tell me that the average Joe Sixpack is going to buy a Chevy Volt to save himself 150/month and sacrifice his nice ride. Ain’t gonna happen
That depends. If you finance the car, you might see your monthly note go up by 100/month, and yet you save 150/month (and rising) on gas. I would say that’s a fair trade.
kayaker 71
November 24th, 2010
2:05 pm
If Obama Motors can’t sell ‘em, maybe they can give ‘em to those less fortunate in our society. Hell, they get housing, food, childcare, little to no taxes and a check once a month….. why not a car. Wonder if it’s big enough to put those big chrome wheels on and if the trunk is big enough for one of those boom boxes. Just as O’Reilly says, looking out for you.
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
2:06 pm
I see the VOLT as a good step in the right direction. All cars should at least be hybrids. Take JUST the regenerative braking feature and the standard losses in energy that happen just to slow down a car now becomes energy that can be used to speed the car up again. Who wouldn’t want to get some free energy in everyday driving??
As electric cars and hybrids become more prevalent, costs do come down. It was mentioned that much of the materials are rare and in limited supply. Lithium, although limited in abundance is one of the rare materials that will not be needed in future generations of automobiles. New substances that can do the same or better than the current materials are constantly being researched.
I just don’t have the space to refute all the reasons against hybrids and electrics. But for those spouting some sort of partisan reason (either for or against) are missing the bigger picture of progress of technology, in energy consumption and conservation, and personal preference.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
2:08 pm
But for those spouting some sort of partisan reason (either for or against) are missing the bigger picture of progress of technology, in energy consumption and conservation, and personal preference.
Quoted for truth
Granny Godzilla
November 24th, 2010
2:17 pm
I love progress in technology and and conservation!
May we have more please?
@@
November 24th, 2010
2:19 pm
Motor Trend goes political!!??!!
Well, opinions are like….you know….everybody’s got one. Here’s “Car & Driver’s”:
While every Volt carries a 120-volt charger (charge time: about 10 hours in our testing) in its trunk, many owners will want a 240-volt system to knock juice-up time down to around four hours. For those who want the matching set, Chevy is selling its own Voltec-branded 240-volt unit, which gets the reasonable price tag of $490.
The Voltec charger’s cost does not, however, include installation—GM estimates another $1475 for a professional to come and wire everything up for you.
In about 10 years, they should have all the bugs worked out. Maybe a recall or “two’ll” do the trick.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:21 pm
Chris D. :
Thanks for the safety link @ 1:02 PM (just got back from the store). I think I’ll pass. That with the 40 grand price tag is kind of a deal killer. Heck, I can get a scooter for in town stuff for 2 grand……… Most of the day to day places I go are within 5 miles of me.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
2:21 pm
If you buy an Indian car, make sure it an original and not a copy. Everyone knows that real TaTas are better than the fake ones.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
2:21 pm
“Take JUST the regenerative braking feature and the standard losses in energy that happen just to slow down a car now becomes energy that can be used to speed the car up again. Who wouldn’t want to get some free energy in everyday driving??”
How about we just go around and fix all of the darn traffic signals in town so they actually make traffic flow efficiently? For example, how about not having to stop at a stoplight on a main roadway at 2am when there is nobody (nobody) coming through the cross street? Think of all of the energy we could all save if we didn’t have to sit in line at a light that lets 5 cars through at a time from a line of 50 during rush hour and then sit for 3 minutes while there is a green-light for a virtually empty cross street.
Loran, Whatayagot?
November 24th, 2010
2:21 pm
Another thing Limbaugh forgot to say, ” Given all the exciting cars you CAN drive, you’ve got to be a dolt to drive a Volt.”
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:23 pm
emo
November 24th, 2010
1:03 pm
Thanks, kayaker, I read the whole thread looking for someone who knew the Volt was not just an electric car.
+++++++++++++++++
Gee did you read the whole thread looking for someone to state they spoke English as well? The article mentioned it was a hybrid, why do we need to state the obvious?
moonbat betty
November 24th, 2010
2:23 pm
Once they can have an alternator to continously re-charge the battery, they may have something…For now, the Volt is more of a novelty.
@@
November 24th, 2010
2:24 pm
Hillbilly:
Four doors?
I look for leg room, head room and a big trunk. I would love it if they’d make cars without consoles. I hate those things.
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
2:25 pm
“I love progress in technology and and conservation!”
I’ll agree the Volt is progress in terms of technology. It is questionable whether it represents progress in conservation. We really won’t know until the carbon payback analysis is published. If it turns out the Volt has negative net carbon payback, it will be detrimental to the environment.
Where's My Party?
November 24th, 2010
2:27 pm
“Just remember: driving and Oxycontin don’t mix”
That’s funny right there. The Chevy Volt is an excellent marvel of technology for sure but at a list of just over $40,000………not sure it is Car of the Year material. The Chevy Cruze would be a better choice and with the savings you could by over 4600 gallons of gas at $3 a gallon. The Buick Regal or new Hyundai Sonata Turbo would also make good choices.
My Car of the Year however….The Ferrari 458 Italia.
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
2:28 pm
@@
You’re all over it. The number one thing they look for in a vehicle is one that is easy to get in and out of. That’s why they don’t like small cars.
mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the Liar Obama - BEND OVER, Here comes the CHANGE!
November 24th, 2010
2:28 pm
Hmmm, it’s still a Government Motors product and I WILL NEVER buy another, PERIOD!
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
2:30 pm
There are not a lot of electric/hybrids on the road. I cannot give you a chart like Jay, but this should help……If you lined up all the alternative energy cars up, they might reach across a small state. If you lined up all the gas powered cars up, they would reach across the US many, many times, at which point a BMW will pull out to pass.
mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the Liar Obama - BEND OVER, Here comes the CHANGE!
November 24th, 2010
2:30 pm
Pennsylvanian
– I’d like to shove my carbon footprint up your…..You green people make me SICK! Go hug a tree!
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
2:30 pm
My Car of the Year however….
2011 Ford Mustang GT. 400+ hp, and decent fuel mileage.
joe
November 24th, 2010
2:31 pm
You can make fun of Limbaugh all you want about the oxycontin but that guy has more knowledge in his left pinky about economics than our President does. Obama has never had a private sector job so what does he know about meeting payroll or better yet putting his money at risk like many of us do.
On the Volt thing, was government money used for that? I would love to have that luxury. BTW, what are these people going to use to charge this car? Oh that’s right we can’t build nuclear or electrical power plants.
MT Historian
November 24th, 2010
2:32 pm
No real surprise in the Volt being MT Car of the Year – MT goes for new-fangled.
Just look at some previous award winners: The list includes the 1960 Chevy Covair (unsafe at any speed), the ‘80 Chevy Citation (front-wheel drive – what an innovation), the Chevy Vega (what, no Ford Pinto?), the Chrysler K-Cars, and the ‘97 Chevy Malibu.
The Corvair’s rear-mounted air-cooled engine – cool. It may have been hard to keep these cars in the showroom, but, alas, harder to keep them on the road – handling problems put them in the ditch.
The Vega was likely named because of its revolutionary 2-year design/market cycle. Of course, if ended up being one of the worst reliable cars made by GM.
The K-Cars – so, Chrysler can manufacture no-frills automobiles that the government will buy by the fleet to ensure that we have 3 major car companies in the US.
The ‘97 Mailibu – still can’t figure that one out (neither could Car & Driver, who said in ‘99 that, in hindsight, the car was not award-worthy).
Personally, I wish the Volt success – but being MTCOTY does not really make it a special car.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:33 pm
I dunno Pennsylvanian. I like the new Camaro. I haven’t ridden in one nor do i know it’s specs, but it has that old “muscle car” look that I grew up with. Although I just googled the ‘Stang. It looks nice too.
JohnnyReb
November 24th, 2010
2:34 pm
Adam – how can a car not yet on the market, that won’t be sold in 44 states, requires a taxpayer funded rebate to put it near 40K, and at best is a tree huggers wet dream, be crowned car of the year? Answer – there is someone, somewhere pushing an agenda. Who and where? The same folks who are pushing carbon caps, wind mills, batteries, and other pie-in-the-sky alternative energy sources that without government social engineering have no chance. And, you ask how can one wonder if Motor Trend is becoming a mouthpiece for the Left?
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
2:34 pm
“Pennsylvanian
– I’d like to shove my carbon footprint up your…..You green people make me SICK! Go hug a tree!”
You apparently have me confused with someone else. I drive a F150 SuperCrew 4×4 and a Cadillac STS. I don’t think that qualifies me as ‘green’. Go back and read for comprehension. You missed something the first time.
williebkind
November 24th, 2010
2:35 pm
I will never buy a GM-union-bailedout product. Going green is not a priority in my life–even if the liberals demand it.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:36 pm
joe
November 24th, 2010
2:31 pm
You can make fun of Limbaugh all you want about the oxycontin but that guy has more knowledge in his left pinky about economics than our President does. Obama has never had a private sector job so what does he know about meeting payroll or better yet putting his money at risk like many of us do.
+++++++++++++++
Really? Please enlighten me with the businesses Mr. Pill Popping reclassified to 4F college drop out Rush Limbaugh has started or even run? He’s an EMPLOYEE not an EMPLOYER.
Cadawg
November 24th, 2010
2:36 pm
LOL Motor Trend, how silly, the same magazine that named the biodegradeable Chevrolet Vega the car of the year! lol If you believe Motor Trend, your IQ is probably less than room temperature.
mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the Liar Obama - BEND OVER, Here comes the CHANGE!
November 24th, 2010
2:39 pm
Pennsylvanian
My apology but this sounds pretty green to me….If it turns out the Volt has negative net carbon payback, it will be detrimental to the environment
emo
November 24th, 2010
2:39 pm
“Gee did you read the whole thread looking for someone to state they spoke English as well?”
Brilliant comment. I read the whole thread and all the reponses that mentioned it called it an electric car and asked what to do when the battery ran out. They are obviously not as smart as you, but then, who is?
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
2:40 pm
Ah yes, the MTCOTY Chevy Vega, a car whose resale value fluctuated from day to day depending on how full the gas tank was.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:40 pm
emo
November 24th, 2010
2:39 pm
They are obviously not as smart as you, but then, who is?
++++++++++++
A very select few. Thank you for noticing.
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
2:41 pm
The Vega was a head gasket saleman’s dream.
williebkind
November 24th, 2010
2:42 pm
I am very concerned about any data coming from the left. It always seems to be tainted one way or another. The problem with Rush from the left is that he does not have a PHD from some liberal university and is making more than 60 million a year. The liberals kept him from being part owner of a NFL team with conservative hate filled standards they can not live upto. Hey but they are a dying political threat and that is the good news.
techengineer
November 24th, 2010
2:43 pm
Is Obama a “natural born” citizen? I think not. What say you?
I hope I heard wrong
November 24th, 2010
2:43 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe@2:28 pm
@@
You’re all over it. The number one thing they look for in a vehicle is one that is easy to get in and out of. That’s why they don’t like small cars.
—————————————————————-
Nope,If I was looking for a hybrid, I would want one that plugged itself in LOL.
How many forget to plug their cellphone in until it dies?
JohnnyReb
November 24th, 2010
2:43 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe, I’m not sure most who post here even come close to knownig what a head gasket is. They may think it’s something to do with sex!
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
2:44 pm
mmm mmm mmm – If the carbon payback is negative, or the payback period is longer than life of the car, the whole concept is a scam. Got it now?
joe
November 24th, 2010
2:44 pm
Limbaugh is his own corporation and if you don’t realize that don’t respond to my post.
You tools can keep talking pill popping references but do you even realize that his had made it to the top of his profession & he is deaf. I thought you liberals were the sensitive lot.
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
2:45 pm
Johnny Reb
Well, it’s the gasket which serves as a seal between the engine block and the cylinder head, for a quick simple explanation.
emo
November 24th, 2010
2:45 pm
Just look at some previous award winners: The list includes the 1960 Chevy Covair (unsafe at any speed), the ‘80 Chevy Citation (front-wheel drive – what an innovation), the Chevy Vega (what, no Ford Pinto?), the Chrysler K-Cars, and the ‘97 Chevy Malibu.
Link, please
BRW
November 24th, 2010
2:46 pm
“to the top of his profession & he is deaf”
Not deaf, he just never listens, except to his replays…
MT Historian
November 24th, 2010
2:47 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Trend_Car_of_the_Year
Ah, Wikipedia – the source of all knowledge.
I hope I heard wrong
November 24th, 2010
2:49 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe@2:41 pm
The Vega was a head gasket saleman’s dream.
——————————————————————
More like an engine rebuilders dream, too dam much aluminum for me. After I rebuilt the first one LOL.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:51 pm
williebkind: I dislike Rush because he is a lout, a druggie AND a hypocrite. His politics have nothing to do with it. I was an avid Boortz listener for probably 20 years or so until he sold out to the Republicans and started toting the mail for them. He’s lost his creativity and isn’t allowed to express his thinking any more. As to Rush? The first time I listened to him was right after the Republicans took control of Congress for the first time in 50 years. They were holding up some of Clinton’s appointments. Not because there was any reason for them to do so, but just because they COULD. How do I know this? It was the topic on Rush’s show that day and he was laughing gleefully about it. I was disgusted and never really paid him much mind after that.
I don’t watch Fox news either. Why you might ask because it’s not left wing? No I would have to reply, because they aren’t trustworthy or credible (never watch 60 minutes for the same reason). You see at the beginning of their existence, FOX news rushed to “report” something that just was true. I couldn’t trust them to give me the truth. They may have changed, I don’t know. they screwed me in the front end so I don’t trust them now.
Pennsylvanian
November 24th, 2010
2:52 pm
MT Historian – The evil handling of the Corvair was corrected in 1963 model with new half shafts articulated at both ends. ‘63 and later models actually handled better than average. But ‘Unsafe At Any Speed’ was already out, and the Corvair was doomed.
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
November 24th, 2010
2:52 pm
Well, I can’t hardly wait till my buddy Jim Earl gets ahold of this idea and goes to work on one of the golf carts up at Countryland Golf Club. You won’t see real Progress on electric cars till he’s finished. He’ll soup it up to go 80 mpg and travel 400 miles before a refill. We don’t have a real electric car now because nobody’s invited Rednecks to join the team. The nice part will be we can drive it to the course and right onto the cart paths.
And I agree with the guy that says some of these warning labels just keep dumb people alive. Why do we need to have “Do Not Drink” on all the anti-freeze containers? Seems to me we’d be alot better off if the dumb people just drunk the stuff to their heart’s content. In a few years there’d be nothing but smart people on this earth.
Have a Happy Thanksgiving everybody.
MT Historian
November 24th, 2010
2:53 pm
Pennsylvanian – you are correct sir. But, it was the 1960 Corvair that was named MTCOTY.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
2:56 pm
mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the Liar Obama – BEND OVER, Here comes the CHANGE! – Hmmm, it’s still a Government Motors product and I WILL NEVER buy another, PERIOD!
Yeah, talk to me in 10 years. When you’ve either become senile or you’ve realized that car companies are not ACTUALLY run by the government.
joe – You can make fun of Limbaugh all you want about the oxycontin but that guy has more knowledge in his left pinky about economics than our President does
That’s BS. First of all, private sector job doesn’t mean you know crap about payroll anyway. Private sector business owner or manager maybe. And he has plenty of people in his cabinet who do have that knowledge. At least you didn’t stoop to the falsehood of saying his cabinet doesn’t know anything either. Plus, running a business at all doesn’t mean you’re actually good at it, or that you work the numbers yourself at all. All Rush has to do is sit in a chair and speak. The rest of the work is done FOR him. He doesn’t know economics any more than a McDonald’s worker who just takes orders does.
JohnnyReb: how can a car not yet on the market, that won’t be sold in 44 states, requires a taxpayer funded rebate to put it near 40K, and at best is a tree huggers wet dream, be crowned car of the year?
Answer – they do this all the time, every year, before the cars are released. They have since before the fantasy world of conservatives believes that the government took over the ENTIRE car industry. If you need further answers to your questions you need only read the response quoted in the main blog post here.
Pennski
November 24th, 2010
2:57 pm
Awesome journalism, copy and paste…
Rush is right, the car doesn’t compare to the Nissan leaf at any demonstrable point. Did Motor Trend get a government bailout too?
Fred
November 24th, 2010
2:57 pm
joe
November 24th, 2010
2:44 pm
Limbaugh is his own corporation and if you don’t realize that don’t respond to my post.
++++++++++++++
So? Who does he EMPLOY? He is syndicated or EMPLOYED on a sub contract basis by Premiere Radio Networks. I know this is all a bit much for you too understand so I’m typing as slowly as I can so you can keep up.
Incorporation is done for tax reasons. Many “sole proprietorship’s” are “corporations.” It is quite clear from your comments that you really have zero understanding of the subject you are addressing. I would suggest you educate yourself a little.
For now? Go back to the kids table, finish drinking your milk out of your sippy cup and let the adults talk.
Patty
November 24th, 2010
2:58 pm
Good for you, Todd Lassa of Motor Trend! Way to put old Lips Limp-bough in his place (yes, Limp-bough). However, it is so typical of old Lips to spew facts from his empty head; most of the time he has NO CLUE. Great idea to suggest he actually drive the car, minus his meds! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Corey
November 24th, 2010
2:58 pm
“Or Hope & Change opining about the Constitution.”
Dave R, do you think before you post? A constitutional scholar, Harvard Law graduate, president of the Harvard Law Review and constitutional law professor at a major university and you post such mindless ignorance. You may wipe the egg off your face now.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
2:59 pm
Can you really trust Motor Trend when it took them until 1968 to name the GTO COTY? mmmmmmmm…..1964 GTO convertible….sigh…my heart is aflutter now
Fred
November 24th, 2010
3:00 pm
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
2:59 pm
1964 GTO convertible….sigh…my heart is aflutter now
+++++++++++++++
That’s just your pace maker acting up because you are standing too near the microwave.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
3:01 pm
Talk about re-educating the driving public. One day we may pull into a full service gas and alternate fuel center. Gas, electric plug ins, Hydrogen, natural gas, etc. all available in one place. Can you imagine pulling into a place and watching an inexperienced teen driver filling up a vehicle using a hose under several hundred pounds of pressure filled with flammable, explosive natural gas? Coming up next, at eleven!
MT Historian
November 24th, 2010
3:02 pm
Y’all realize that Mr. Lassa did exactly what Mr. Limbaugh wanted. RL is an entertainer that thrives on controversy. Mr. Lassa kept this controversy alive. If MT had ignored the comments, then RL would have moved onto the next thing – likely Jennifer Grey’s shocking upset of Bristol Palin in DWTS thanks to a liberal voting block.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
3:05 pm
@Fred – does my pacemaker mean I will be strip-searched when I fly out of Hartsfield on Friday? oohhhh la la…pack a lunch
ricardus
November 24th, 2010
3:06 pm
Todd Lassa of Motor Trend just removed any credibility his magazine ever had when he exposed his hostility toward the Republican Party and his LDS (Limbaugh Derangement Syndrome). The Volt is a product of the Government Motors that took stolen funds in the billions from the American taxpayers. Will not buy or own a GM car. Ford is the only reliable AMERICAN car and I will replace my present GM car with a Ford next week.
And thanks Rush for being a great American! I’m a Rpublican (the AMERICAN party) and Motor Trend has offended me this American.
BRW
November 24th, 2010
3:07 pm
” likely Jennifer Grey’s shocking upset of Bristol Palin in DWTS thanks to a liberal voting block”
The most shocking thing is that Sarah didn’t demand a recount to refudiate the results or complains that the Russians that reside just off her back porch didn’t get to vote……
josef nix
November 24th, 2010
3:07 pm
I’m not making fun of Limbaugh. G-d made the fun. I’m just laughing.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
3:08 pm
@ AngryRedMarsWoman: LOL one can always dream…………..
Also, your about about what older Americans want in a car stopped THAT person cold didn’t it? I laughed but was too late reading it to respond………
Fred
November 24th, 2010
3:10 pm
I’m with you on that one Josef. I laugh at limbaugh, not with him.
When ever I wonder HOW Deal could get elected as Governor, I only have to remember how many people think Rush is the guardian of the truth……….
BRW
November 24th, 2010
3:11 pm
“Ford is the only reliable AMERICAN car…”
Dumb A$$. Check how many parts of a Ford, or any other manf. for that matter, are actually MADE in the USA this day and time. Bite that nose off, your face doesn’t really care…..
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
3:13 pm
The list from Motor Trend themselves.
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/car/car_of_the_year_winners/index.html
iTiSi
November 24th, 2010
3:13 pm
How many middle class people can afford a $35,000 car period? That is who really needs this vehicle. When it first surfaced they said it would be about $25,000. Guess the other $10,000 goes to pay for the union employees healthcare and retirement. So they want the taxpayers to help pay for their benefits in order to drive an unproven electric car? I will gladly wait until the bugs are worked out and the price comes down, if then. You folks can be the “guinea pigs”. Not a fan of Limbaugh’s, so no dog in the fight. Would bet Motor Trend got some big bucks through the back door.
Motorhead takes King of the Dittoheads to school | Jay Bookman | Slinking Toward Retirement
November 24th, 2010
3:14 pm
[...] Motorhead takes King of the Dittoheads to school | Jay Bookman. [...]
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
3:14 pm
Fred @ 3:08
I answered the question at 2:28.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
3:14 pm
I foresee fueling centers that have a waiting area for drivers who have to recharge their electric cars. TV, internet access, games for the kids while you wait for recharging. Also, restaurants and stores will have charging areas available while you eat and shop, with a small fee for electricity used. They could put the recharging area right next to the Handicapped Parking, because that is what they will be, handicapped by the cost, the limited range, and the inconvienence of electric cars.
ricardus
November 24th, 2010
3:15 pm
Cory: Get your face wipes out. There is no evidence that Hussein Obama is a graduate of Harvard Law School, no evidence that he was president or editor of the Harvard Law Review, and he was never a “constitutional law professor at a major university” not even a minor university. Hussein never studied Constitutional Law and he doesn’t even believe in the US Constitution as his reign in Washington attests.
Hussein is a fraud, phoney, charlatan and is not even an American citizen.
So Corey, go wash your face and go find some truth before you speak.
AngryRedMarsWoman
November 24th, 2010
3:17 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe ” I answered the question at 2:28.”
I still like my answer better…..sex is what everyone is looking for, isn’t it? I know that the older I get the more I am looking for it. In the car, in the kitchen, on the floor….heck, even when the TSA is searching me on Friday…bring your cameras.
POW
November 24th, 2010
3:18 pm
I just subscribed – 36 issues for $26.00!
http://www.motortrend.com
Fred
November 24th, 2010
3:18 pm
@ Hillbilly Deluxe: You did? LOL I figured you were just shaking your head and left it alone. (I didn’t remember who posed the question, just the answer she gave)
BC
November 24th, 2010
3:19 pm
As much as I agree that Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot, yes I know he lost weight, but he is still a big fat idiot, the guys at Motor Trend have been idiots even longer, fat or skinny!!
It’s a GM product, It’s a piece of JUNK!!!
williebkind
November 24th, 2010
3:21 pm
Now listen how you bloggers are personally attacking Rush. You are making fun of his disability! You can not forgive him for taking legal drugs gotten possibly and controversially illegally but is now clean. But it is ok to be here illegal. Rush’s program is not a news program but a commentary. He announces out loud that he is a republican and only republicans can save the day IF they stick to republican values. Rush’s opinion is just a sound as anybody’s opinion and Rush’s opinion is formed from real fact based research. There liberals is where you are left behind.
emo
November 24th, 2010
3:21 pm
Thanks for that link, MT Historian. There were actually a good number of great cars on that list, too. In any case, the first year of a car won’t tell you how it will wear over the years, just what it promises in the way of technology and innovation. Some don’t deliver.
I had a ‘64 Corvair and it handles satisfactorily. However, in common with may cars of the era, it was a piece of junk. The only saving grace was that when it broke down, I could work on it, and I’m no gearhead. Traded it in in ‘71 for $50.00.
Sid Farcas
November 24th, 2010
3:23 pm
Car of the Year, Pulitzer, what else can this great man accomplish beforew he is booted out in 2012 by Hildabeast? Maybe getting the economy going and cut spending and worry about the little freak in North korea and start taxing China imports and….you know, important stuff.
Just Saying...
November 24th, 2010
3:30 pm
But does the Chevy Volt have the new Seat & a half size?
Hey Ricardus
November 24th, 2010
3:30 pm
Dontcha think the former head of the CIA, and the former POTUS (Clinton) would’ve vetted out PRESIDENT Obama as a candidate?
I mean really, what do you think Panetta and Hillary weren’t digging for every scrap of evidence they could get to beat him in the elections? your conspiracy theories are therefore ridiculous
williebkind
November 24th, 2010
3:31 pm
I hope my gonads fall off if I ever buy a GM product.
Hey Ricardus
November 24th, 2010
3:31 pm
what about Rove and Bush (also former head of the CIA)? these boys can get dirt on anybody on the planet!
Dave
November 24th, 2010
3:32 pm
“Really? Please enlighten me with the businesses Mr. Pill Popping reclassified to 4F college drop out Rush Limbaugh has started or even run? He’s an EMPLOYEE not an EMPLOYER”
Yes, he is syndicated by Premier Radio, but he owns EIB (Excellence in Broadcasting) and hires and pays his own radio staff…. so he’s also an employer.
Hey BC
November 24th, 2010
3:32 pm
I’ve been driving my GMC truck for over 200,000 miles. It’s still running strong my friend. Buy American
Fred
November 24th, 2010
3:34 pm
williebkind
November 24th, 2010
3:31 pm
I hope my gonads fall off if I ever buy a GM product.
+++++++++++++
You mean you HAVE some?
Just kidding lol. You left that teed up and I just HAD to drive it down range
capitalism and war
November 24th, 2010
3:38 pm
The problem with electric cars is that the driver is enveloped in a strong electromagnetic field. No, that’s not gonna cause a rise in the rate of cancer. There’s no evidence that electromagnetism is dangerous to humans. Why, it’s good for them, or else how could you explain Frankenstein and the way he was brought to life with electricity?
Only a Dolt don’t like the Volt.
Dave
November 24th, 2010
3:39 pm
The gov’t buying cars from itself…. slick…
Obama Bolsters U.S. Hybrid Automobile Sales in Waning Consumer Market
“President Barack Obama’s administration has bought almost a fourth of the Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co. hybrid vehicles sold since he took office, accelerating federal purchases as consumer demand wanes.
The U.S. General Services Administration, which runs the government fleet, bought at least 14,584 hybrid vehicles in the past two fiscal years, or about 10 percent of 145,473 vehicles the agency purchased in that period, according to sales data obtained by Bloomberg under a Freedom of Information Act request. In fiscal 2008, hybrids accounted for less than 1 percent of government purchases, the data showed.
[snip]
About 3,100 of the hybrids purchased by GSA were paid for out of $300 million that the agency received from the 2009 economic stimulus package, said Sara Merriam, a spokeswoman for the agency, in an interview. Another 5,600 were bought with proceeds from selling older cars in the government fleet, she said. A majority of fiscal 2009 hybrid sales came after Obama took office in January 2009.
[snip]
The government purchased about 64 percent of GM’s Chevy Malibu hybrid models and 29 percent of all Ford Fusion hybrids manufactured since Obama took office in 2009, the data show. GM stopped making the Malibu hybrid in 2009 after lack of consumer demand. ”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-23/obama-bolsters-u-s-hybrid-auto-sales-in-waning-consumer-market.html
The Next Wave of the Electric Car Era Is Almost Here – Forbes (blog) | occasion auto : blog généraliste
November 24th, 2010
3:40 pm
[...] cities any day …Electric Cars Go MainstreamEarth911.comA green tide washes inThe ProvinceMotorhead takes King of the Dittoheads to schoolAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)Los Angeles Times -Florida Times-Union -Business Daily [...]
Fred
November 24th, 2010
3:43 pm
Dave
November 24th, 2010
3:32 pm
Yes, he is syndicated by Premier Radio, but he owns EIB (Excellence in Broadcasting)
+++++++++++++++
Dave Dave Dave, you poor little mis guided fool. I see why he is your hero. you can’t think for yourself or do any research. Limbaugh frequently mentions the EIB (Excellence In Broadcasting) network, but this is a mythic construction, as he told the New York Times in 1990. I mean come on now, that’s 20 YEARS ago……… It’s just something he calls his show you knuckle head.
Straight Talk
November 24th, 2010
3:52 pm
Once again, Rush gets the last laugh. As many of the comments above show, he is a past master at enticing liberals to foam at the mouth. I heard his comments on the radio. His main point was that the Obama administration in buying a lion’s share of the Volt’s thus insuring the success of this alleged advance in automobiles from Government Motors. Where I come from this is called robbing Peter to pay Paul.
@@
November 24th, 2010
3:53 pm
Hillbilly:
The number one thing they look for in a vehicle is one that is easy to get in and out of. That’s why they don’t like small cars.
My car is small, but the seats go wa-a-a-y back and the head room is exceptional . It’s a Subaru Outback, so the trunk is REALLY big.
My husband is about 2 inches taller than me, but his legs aren’t as long. When he had his ‘58 Corvette, I literally had to fall out of the thing. I can sympathize with the older crowd.
I’m a bit claustrophobic so I refuse to ride in the backseat of anyone’s car. The only time I had no other option, it was summertime…there were three people in the backseat…got stuck in a traffic jam for two hours. I began shedding clothes because I couldn’t breathe.
Never again!
When Hell Freezes Over
November 24th, 2010
3:58 pm
joe
November 24th, 2010
2:44 pm
Limbaugh is his own corporation and if you don’t realize that don’t respond to my post.
You tools can keep talking pill popping references but do you even realize that his had made it to the top of his profession & he is deaf. I thought you liberals were the sensitive lot.
———————————————-
Liberals are only sensitive about themselves, other liberals and leftist issues.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
4:02 pm
But I’m not a liberal Hellboy. I despise fanatical mindless left wingers as much as I despise radical right wingers. I’m someone who actually HAS a brain and doesn’t need a Rush Limbaugh or a Michael Moore to tell me what I think.
Nice try tool. Keep rolling off the catch phrases you learned form your “betters.” What sad is that your “betters are dumber than dog squeeze, so what does that make you?
Hillbilly Deluxe
November 24th, 2010
4:03 pm
@@
I had a Ranger that was extremely comfortable, once you were in it. It was hell to get in and out of, with my legs and feet and all. When the motor finally blew up, at 240,000+ miles, I moved up to an F150, extended cab. Greatest thing since sliced bread.
Eric
November 24th, 2010
4:06 pm
So Dave R could go on…..I truly wish he would.
Travis McGee
November 24th, 2010
4:08 pm
Mr. Limbaugh is PO’ed because a Bentley wasn’t the Car of the Year. From my limited experience with Mr. Limbaugh, he’s very negative about science and scientific advances and observations. He sort of reminds me of the mindset of the Catholic church in the 15th and 16th centuries. The Church felt it had all the answers — absolute power over the masses — and rejected scietific discoveries that made them look really stupid in the end.
But, in the end it’s hard to take Limbaugh seriously, he’s such a joke!
Eric
November 24th, 2010
4:11 pm
ricardas appears to be a complete idiot…there’s plenty of evidence to prove it right here on this page.
TGT
November 24th, 2010
4:11 pm
“The Chevy Volt is a disaster. It is extremely expensive…The only people who are going to buy it are going to be very rich people who are going to park it outside their townhouse for ostentatious show of how virtuous they are while they drive around in their Cadillac Escalade.”
“This is a classic example of what happens when the political and ideological desires of an administration are imposed on a private company…It’s not how many jobs you create or even save, it’s can you sell a product in the market that will make a profit? Otherwise, it’s a farce.”
TGT
November 24th, 2010
4:14 pm
Advertised as an all-electric car that could drive 50 miles on its lithium battery, GM addressed concerns about where you plug the thing in en route to grandma’s house by adding a small gasoline engine to help maintain the charge on the battery as it starts to run down. It was still an electric car, we were told, and not a hybrid on steroids.
That’s not quite true. The gasoline engine has been found to be more than a range-extender for the battery. Volt engineers are now admitting that when the vehicle’s lithium-ion battery pack runs down and at speeds near or above 70 mph, the Volt’s gasoline engine will directly drive the front wheels along with the electric motors. That’s not charging the battery — that’s driving the car.
So it’s not an all-electric car, but rather a pricey $41,000 hybrid that requires a taxpayer-funded $7,500 subsidy to get car shoppers to look at it. But gee, even despite the false advertising about the powertrain, isn’t a car that gets 230 miles per gallon of gas worth it?
We heard GM’s then-CEO Fritz Henderson claim the Volt would get 230 miles per gallon in city conditions. Popular Mechanics found the Volt to get about 37.5 mpg in city driving, and Motor Trend reports: “Without any plugging in, (a weeklong trip to Grandma’s house) should return fuel economy in the high 30s to low 40s.”
Car and Driver reported that “getting on the nearest highway and commuting with the 80-mph flow of traffic — basically the worst-case scenario — yielded 26 miles; a fairly spirited backroad loop netted 31; and a carefully modulated cruise below 60 mph pushed the figure into the upper 30s.”
AtlMike
November 24th, 2010
4:19 pm
I thought Limbaugh promised to move to another country if Obama won. Limbaugh has no credibility when it comes to grading cars and their performance. Maybe he should stick to drugs.
Fred
November 24th, 2010
4:22 pm
I thought several lefties promised to move on if Bush got re-elected. I didn’t see that they moved either. Same idiot mentality, only the party has changed……..
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
4:31 pm
1) Limbaugh slamming the car before he has driven it = stupid
2) response from Motor Trend = very wiity
3) Motor Trend voting a car that hardly anyone can buy based on availability = we don’t understand their criteria very well
4) People on this Blog slamming the car because it’s too “Liberal” = about as clueless as I’ve seen anyone be. (which I guess would include Rush)
5) People on this blog saying the Volt is the next best thing to sliced bread = not nearly as clueless, but you need to drive it to make this determination
6) The Volt doesn’t sell well because it’s too expensive compared to the Leaf or Prius = reality that wil soon come to pass.
For me, I’ll be in line for a 2012 hybrid of some sort unless there is an electric that has a range greater than 200 miles. (I’m looking at you TESLA MOTORS) Gas prices will continue to rise if we do not take major steps as a country to reduce our demand. Having an electric car that uses much more cheaply supplied plug-in power (and likely mostly free solar power), is what the future holds. There will be several steps until we get there. Just the same way there were several steps to move from horse & buggy to motorcar.
Prepare for it people, it’s coming!
. . . and it’s the 21st century, where the bleep are the flying cars????
YourConscience~
November 24th, 2010
4:32 pm
THE PRESIDENT IS BLACK : GET OVER IT !
Lugnut
November 24th, 2010
4:37 pm
First person to mention Oxycontin in this debate loses. No-really. The shills are all on the side of the electric crap. Just let a Volt or a Leaf shut down in the second from the right lane on 285 and receive an overdose of 18-wheeler tracks, and the federal subsidy to get people to buy these environmental nightmares will have to be 100%. As for Motor Trend, who gives a rat’s rear what they name as car of the year. I am sure it too is populated by candy-arses that keep a rag soaked in kerosene in their back pocket to keep the flies off their lilly white arses. Meanwhile, just what damage is done to ye old mother earth to manufacture all those batteries?
Fred
November 24th, 2010
4:38 pm
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
4:31 pm
“Gas prices will continue to rise if we do not take major steps as a country to reduce our demand.”
Our demand is barely a factor in the equation. The “problem’ is that China has finally joined the modern World and industrialized. They are taking all the oil that we used to get.
“. . . and it’s the 21st century, where the bleep are the flying cars????”
I think we need to ask Tom Swift.
Ramguy
November 24th, 2010
4:40 pm
What the dittoheads never fail to realize is that it’s not we don’t have compassion towards someone who finds themselves addicted to drugs, it’s that we have no patience or understanding for Limpaugh’s hypocisy. According to his own words he should be in prison. After all he stated that’s were people who use drugs should be. You can say all the “but but but but it was legal drugs he was addicted to” all you want. What you are saying he’s your drug addict so it must be ok.
Taxpayer30189
November 24th, 2010
4:42 pm
From GM’s website:
Range 25 to 50 miles, then you have to fire up a gas powered generator to go farther.
Charge time, 10 Hours. TEN HOURS.
After the initial 40 miles of battery power, the car gets 35 to 40 MPG. Like a Honda.
How much does the Volt cost? $48500.00.
GM has chosen LG Chem of Korea to supply the lithium-ion cells. Why?
I think I’ll just buy a Honda and use the left over money to buy 400,000 miles of GAS!
It looks to me like Rush is right again.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
4:48 pm
Todd Lassa of Motor Trend just removed any credibility his magazine ever had when he exposed his hostility toward the Republican Party and his LDS (Limbaugh Derangement Syndrome).
This is exactly the kind of BS that needs to stop. Someone loses credibility because they think unfavorably of the Republican Party or one of its operatives? So I have to follow all GOP things unquestioningly in order to be credible. No, STFU. Go crawl back into your made up land where everyone has the same exact thoughts, emotions, etc as everyone else. Go back to your “utopia” known as Fox News.
ricardus: There is no evidence that Hussein Obama is a graduate of Harvard Law School, no evidence that he was president or editor of the Harvard Law Review, and he was never a “constitutional law professor at a major university” not even a minor university
Uh, there’s plenty of evidence. Obviously by “evidence” you mean “things Fox News/Rush/Beck says,” since the world of FACTS disagrees with you there.
Hey BC – I’ve been driving my GMC truck for over 200,000 miles. It’s still running strong my friend. Buy American
Thank you for being a new sane voice in the crowd. Goodness knows we need more.
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
4:58 pm
Fred says: “The “problem’ is that China has finally joined the modern World and industrialized.”
Plus add India to that, and there’s another billion people wanting to drive. (but they get the TaTa)
Taxpayer30189 says: “How much does the Volt cost? $48500.00.”
See my #6 above. Like I said, the Volt (~50K) is a good step, the same way the Tesla Roadster ~$110K) is a good step. But for mass-market, we’ll need the Leaf (~30K), the Prius(~25K), and the 2012 Tesla S-Type (their upcoming mid-size car ~ 60K) (and 2015-2018 Tesla small car -hopefully <40K).
Martin Williams
November 24th, 2010
5:00 pm
What a big big shame when people that say they love America and even wear a rist band American flag like Sarah Palin still DON’T trust American products. We love America but we want the president policies to fail. When the president fails we all fail. George W. Bush failed badly and look what is happening to us…..big fools.
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
5:01 pm
My 2000 Saturn (when Saturn was “independent” of GM) is now at 200,000 miles. GM killed Saturn when it made Saturn just another GM brand and diluted the quality.
GM also killed the electric car when it had the chance to become the world leader of the future automotive revolution. But electric cars have so little maintenance that they don’t get much residual income that the usual clunkers give them.
capitalism and war
November 24th, 2010
5:08 pm
the problem with electric cars is this: where will we get a secure supply of dilithium crystals? The Klingons are hoarding their supply and the Ferengi shoot prospectors on sight.
Electrical warp drive was a tremendous advance in the horseless carriage. And I applaud the Chinese for inventing it. But answer me this: why is it that a half hour after you charge the battery, you want to charge it again?
FYI
November 24th, 2010
5:13 pm
Aside from you Jay, who gives a @3$% what Limbaugh says? Jeez, this is pathetic. Same old crap, day after, day. Screw Limbaugh, Olberman, Hannity, Beck, Madow, etc. Who cares what any of them think or say? It’s nearly Thanksgiving, and rather than bitch and moan about who said this, or who said that, how about a little thanks for the things that are good in your life.
El Jefe
November 24th, 2010
5:23 pm
Actually, Rush likes his Maybach over the Bently
Logical Dude
November 24th, 2010
5:25 pm
capitalism and war says: “where will we get a secure supply of dilithium crystals?”
I’m telling you, this is why we need the singularity drive. the lack of dilithium crystals is a huge factor in being able to move to singularity drives. Of course, there is the risk of making your ship a black hole if the singularity gets too much mass, but I think that risk is better than trying to invade the whole Klingon empire when they have the Ferengi’s on their side.
FYI says: “who gives a @3$% what Limbaugh says?”
Funny you should ask this. I think it’s more about the witty retort in response to what Limbaugh says.
dave
November 24th, 2010
5:36 pm
Man who listens to Rush have limpbaughlls.
"Information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment" - BHO, May 1, 2010
November 24th, 2010
5:38 pm
The Volt isn’t what GM promised it would be. The gas engine in the Volt powers the wheels !!
This makes the Volt an “Ultra-Hybrid” not an all-electric car.
The Nissan Leaf is the real, electric-only car and it’s half the price of the Volt.
The Chrysler/GM bailout was and continues to be a gigantic mistake.
John Galt
November 24th, 2010
6:11 pm
“Government Motors” is a correct name. Apparently Motor Trend couldn’t defend its position like adultsw, with facts, but resorted to a sophomoric low blow. You leftist don’t get that you don’t have to be perfect in order to have an opinion. Their spokesman’s response shows that the Democrats do in fact own that particular magazine.
If you voted Republican, which the MAJORITY of America did last week, you should consider this choice and this rebuttal before buying another copy of that magazine.
Sincerely, stupid and mindless because I don’t agree with the liberals, I am
John Galt
PS- Can we discuss this choice again in this column after 1,000 Volts have been sold and those buyors have figured out how to recharge the batteries?
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
6:12 pm
I guess they can congratulate obama on the Sherman Tank and the Space Shuttle as well as the Volt, considering they were all designed before he came into office.
BADA BING
November 24th, 2010
6:15 pm
I want to ask obama if the Volt is going to be sold in all 57 states.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
6:27 pm
John Galt – You leftist don’t get that you don’t have to be perfect in order to have an opinion. Their spokesman’s response shows that the Democrats do in fact own that particular magazine.
Point 1) You are saying that one need not be perfect to have an opinion. Yet, you expect that the Motor Trend guy be perfect before he expresses his.
Point 2) One does not have to be a Democrat to make a statement such as the one made. You need only be attacked for no reason other than you have said something is good that Rush thinks is bad, just because GM made it.
If you voted Republican, which the MAJORITY of America did last week, you should consider this choice and this rebuttal before buying another copy of that magazine.
Am I going to nitpick for no reason other than to nitpick? WHY YES I AM. The public didn’t vote last week. They voted on November 2, over 3 weeks ago.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
6:29 pm
BADA BING: Who is praising Obama for this? I’m liberal and I know he had no hand in the design, creation, or anything except having helped the company stay alive through the bailout which is being paid back.
Oddly, the most capitalist thing Obama could have done is what he did: he invested in the company and he’s getting the company to give him a return on the investment. And no, I don’t mean the car. I mean the money is being paid back, with interest.
I'm rich and your not.
November 24th, 2010
7:09 pm
Think he’s going deaf from listening to himself all these years?
Adam Redux
November 24th, 2010
7:10 pm
Only a financially astute imbecile as Adam would consider shelling out $50B and getting back $7B and calling that a return of money with interest. I suppose the bond holders who were screwed in the whole thing should be happy now……..
"Information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment" - BHO, May 1, 2010
November 24th, 2010
7:19 pm
If you really do the math it is fairly simple regarding all-electric cars.
First – You need to be on solar power to make it worthwhile.
Second – The tax breaks you ‘ll receive from Uncle Sam are pretty good. It’s approx. 30%.
Third – Most buyers are going to “plug-in”. Where does the juice come from?
Conclusion – If you have the money, add solar panels and buy a Leaf. It takes about 6 years to break even.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
7:26 pm
I think you missed the part where I said “being” paid back. As in, it isn’t over yet. They still owe money and are still paying it. Anyway your admission that we are getting some back is at least better than some other ridiculous arguments I’ve heard.
Taxpayer30189
November 24th, 2010
9:18 pm
This is the only way Jay can get attention.
Sid Farcas
November 24th, 2010
10:38 pm
Rush aggrivates the piss out of Book Man. Jay is such a turd.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 24th, 2010
10:47 pm
If it’s such a great car, why do taxpayers have to subsidize it with a $7500 rebate?
Adam
November 24th, 2010
11:00 pm
If it’s such a great car, why do taxpayers have to subsidize it with a $7500 rebate?
Uh… they don’t? WTF do you think a rebate is? Do you think other dealers don’t have rebates?
Adam Redux
November 24th, 2010
11:10 pm
Uh…no…..imbecile…..other manufactures don’t recieve tax credits for selling their cars. Only guvmint motors has that little nugget.
Adam
November 24th, 2010
11:24 pm
That is incorrect. Other dealers also get tax credits and have always gotten rebates. Look it up.
lynnie gal
November 24th, 2010
11:59 pm
How big is the Chevy Volt? I don’t think Limbaugh can fit his fat ass into the driver’s seat so I doubt he’ll borrow one for the weekend–
Ken
November 25th, 2010
12:33 am
Of you old enough to remember, the GM Vega was Car of The Year. The only GM Car of Year that wasn’t a looser was the Corvette.
Ken
November 25th, 2010
12:44 am
lynnie gal, you must be a liberal, Rush only weighs 195. Be nice.
Sa Vant
November 25th, 2010
12:52 am
I’ll keep my V-8 gas guzzler. Liberal weenies, green-necked hippies (they never wash), elitist magazine writers and effete newspaper columnists can suck the tailpipe on my AMG.
Ron Hyatt
November 25th, 2010
4:38 am
When you commie wackos support new nuclear power plants to power the Chevy Vole, come see me. Otherwise, go lick your balls you Obamajamas. Fark each and every one of you unlubed, you Anti American tards.
Quick drum roll and bada bing
November 25th, 2010
6:07 am
Good to see someone call that fat, uninformed, druggie what he is. Can’t believe people listen (very long) to that fool.
zeke
November 25th, 2010
6:17 am
Mr. Lassa is definitely brain dead, brain washed or whatever! MAINSTREAM AMERICAN CAR? WHAT AN IDIOT! UNTIL THEY CAN MAKE AN ELECTRIC POWERED CAR THAT YOU CAN DRIVE FROM NYC TO LA, IT WILL NOT BE WORTH THE INTEREST ON THE LOAN TO BUY IT! IF THEY CAN FIGURE OUT HOW TO RECHARGE IT WHILE DRIVING, MAYBE THEN IT WILL CATCH ON! BUT, ONLY IF THE PRICE COMES CLOSE TO OR LESSER THAN CURRENT MODELS! ALSO, THE SIZE MUST COME CLOSE TO AN IMPALA, LINCOLN CONTINENTAL OR A BIG BUICK! AND, THE GOVERNMENT MUST QUIT USING YOUR AND MY TAX DOLLARS TO SUBSIDIZE IT SO THAT PEOPLE WHO REALLY DO NOT WANT IT WILL BUY IT!
SuperB
November 25th, 2010
7:24 am
Rush Limbaugh get more “gas mileage” than any automobile!
Adam Redux
November 25th, 2010
7:39 am
Always the out is to ask someone else to prove your case for you…..nice try. Please explain all the tax credits that Toyota is recieving for their cars. Toyota has the US government after it trying to insuniate the car is having issues. Last I checked Japanese cars (made in USA) lead the world in quality.
vince neil
November 25th, 2010
7:52 am
First of all..to all the Obama cool aid drinkers out there..the Volt was planned waaaaaay before GM pulled it’s fake bankruptcy and the O facilitated the largest payoff to Unions every foisted upon ANY citizenry ever!!!! Second, this POS requires at least a 7.5k bribe to have people look at it..much like Toyota has to subsidize the horrible Prius….(like you giving your friend $100 to date your sister)…Third, what do you do with the stupid used up batteries after this junk heap has expired…Fourth. Motor Trend is the weasel of all Car Magazines..I have read all of them since high school…..Fifth, a coal burning plant will be required to produce power for this idiot mobile because the envrio weenies will not allow nukes or hyrdo plants to make the electricity these boring cars will require..and lastly….if the market wants any of these stupid cars they will get wait in line for them..not happening…
OBAMAMOTORS
November 25th, 2010
8:11 am
Limbaugh’s right. No one will drive the VOLT. Todd Lassa doth protest too much. He needs a pink slip. Course he won’t because he is protecting his Marxist leader.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 25th, 2010
8:22 am
Taxpayers, not dealers, are paying the rebates to get folks to buy this turd. Nice try at misdirection, Adam, but you failed.
Kevin
November 25th, 2010
8:38 am
I hope Motor Trend is ready for the protests from advertisers that is going to follow.
And, honestly, they deserve it. Rush didn’t directly slam the magazine, but they responded with a personal attack.
Personally, I think they need to pay dearly for their mistake.
Dave
November 25th, 2010
9:29 am
Have you seen the Volt? If you had you would not want it and the people that buy it would be just a status symbol. This is Obama’s and his Unions dream car and our nightmare as tax payers.
The Thin Guy
November 25th, 2010
10:12 am
Why didn’t the Chevy Volt win the Nobel Peach Prize? I’d like to have one. But with a price tag of $ 40k only rich propagandists for the DNC like Jay Bookman can afford one. When a Volt drives over an Ohm does it produce an Amp?
itpdude
November 25th, 2010
10:13 am
Limbaugh is a tool. He has not even driven the car, eh? But he rips the car anyways. Nice. Does he review books without reading them, too?
Skitty Fritty
November 25th, 2010
10:31 am
Buyer Beware, factor in the higher initial purchase price and the ongoing maintenance before you buy. I would ask a couple of key questions:
1) How much is a new battery and how long will the new one last?
2) Does the car come with a spare tire?
These electric/hybird cars aren’t what you think they are.
Skitty Fritty
November 25th, 2010
10:34 am
What if the free market would have been allowed to function and GM would have gone under? We would probably have a new car company right now started by ex GM workers who want to make a quality car the public is asking for, kinda like Saturn?
Interesting when Eastern Airlines was allowed to fail, the airline industry didn’t cease to exist. If there is market/public demand then someone will fill the void because there is OPPORTUNITY for many involved.
Don
November 25th, 2010
10:35 am
“Both Jay and Cynthia are pushing START today. Reports are Obama is using every waking moment pushing for ratification. Perhaps he called/email them.”
As are the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Pentagon. Why do republicans hate america?
Don The Beater
November 25th, 2010
11:58 am
Don………when did you stop beating your “partner”?
Chevy Volt tops Prius in fuel economy rating – Reuters | occasion auto : blog généraliste
November 25th, 2010
12:37 pm
[...] Shows Results Will VaryGreentech Media (blog)Leading the ChargeLos Angeles TimesTG Daily -Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) -Jalopnik (blog)all 515 news [...]
JohnnyReb
November 25th, 2010
12:38 pm
Adam@11PM – the $7500 is not a manufacturers rebate; its a Government tax credit – money out of the pocket of everyone who TRULY pays taxes. The whole GM scenario is a publicity scam, just like GM paying back some owed the government. GM paid it back using Stimulus funds received from Obama. It was like paying your VISA bill with your Master Card.
Adam
November 25th, 2010
12:47 pm
Always the out is to ask someone else to prove your case for you…..nice try. Please explain all the tax credits that Toyota is recieving for their cars.
That’s exactly what YOU’RE doing right there. Nice try. Plus you’re focusing on a single company, when many companies have rebates and tax credits.
Toyota has the US government after it trying to insuniate the car is having issues. Last I checked Japanese cars (made in USA) lead the world in quality.
You may be right about those two things, but I wasn’t talking about that. I’m actually fairly sure that you’re right about Japanese cars, but have no idea about the Toyota issue. It wouldn’t surprise me though.
LBB: You keep saying that (about taxpayer money paying for the incentive), but you have no proof. Unless you’re trying to say that the government bailout means that necessarily there must be some taxpayer money poured into every aspect. That I agree with, except for the key issue of it’s getting paid back so I still think of it more as an investment than a sinkhole of taxpayer money. Plus taxpayers are not STILL paying for anything. The money is spent already, and the government is just waiting to get the money back. Hence the investment aspect. If you feel this strongly about taxpayer money being fungible, why aren’t you also upset about what the Chamber of Commerce did?
zeke: Your all caps explanation was hard to read, because it was all caps. However, after reading it I found you to be incorrect. Your premise is that the Volt is an all electric car, which it is not. It is a hybrid. It’s range is only limited by how far it is to the next gas station in relation to how much MPG it gets on its tank, plus whatever charging was done prior to that.
Adam
November 25th, 2010
12:49 pm
JohnnyReb – Other cars have tax credits that the consumer can put on their taxes. It’s not all GM.
JoeSquid
November 25th, 2010
1:30 pm
GM used to be a sponsor of the Rush Limbaugh show before the government takeover of the company. Rush gave away GM vehicles on his show before, but Rush is just calling it like it is. Nobody would choose this GM car over the Camaro or even one of the Buicks if given the choices to rank them car of the year. Yeah, the whole green thing is great for advertising and appeasing the liberals BUT now you have to consider the disposal of these batteries. I see disposal fees for recycling/removing of metals for proper disposal. The Green Movement is just another money making scheme that many Americans don’t want to be forced to be a part of, but between the government and media they have no choice.
Adam
November 25th, 2010
2:16 pm
JoeSquid: Motor Trend rated the car on more than just “it’s green.” And I don’t think the general U.S. public is being “forced” into a “Green Movement.” You may have a different view if you live in an area where there are a lot of people who want to be green and pass laws to make it happen, but that doesn’t happen everywhere, not even in most places.
Plus, disposal of the batteries is about the same as any other car service – you’re unlikely to be handling the dirty work when you just bring your car in for service. You just pay for all the fees etc.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 25th, 2010
3:20 pm
Adam, the federal goby is sending $7500 of SOMEBODY’S money to Volt buyers. Taxpayers will eventually have to repay the Chinese for these rebates. Why sous a car that doesn’t suck need it’s own mini-bailout?
Adam
November 25th, 2010
3:33 pm
LBB: It’s a government incentive to get a fuel efficient car. Aside from that, what are you worried about? I thought these things won’t sell very well? Surely the taxpayer doesn’t have to foot that much of a bill if very few of these cars are sold, right?
Adam
November 25th, 2010
3:47 pm
It took a lot of effort, but I found a list of 5 cars (which is nowhere near a complete list, there are quite a few more) that get you a large tax credit. Even though this particular page says the credit is $4500, the range of a tax credit right now for fuel efficient cars is $2500-$7500. The following link shows 5 qualifying cars:
http://hubpages.com/hub/5-Cars-to-Maximize-4500-Clunker-Tax-Credit
None of them are GM cars. Other articles illustrate how this tax credit applies to other vehicles and allows you to get anywhere from $2500 to $7500. However, I cannot post too many links in a single post if I want it to appear. A Google search of “tax credit for fuel efficient cars” does the trick.
So now, you can all shut up about how it’s ONLY GM, or ONLY the Volt, or how it’s all about a government controlled company giving you tax credits and the taxpayers only paying for it somehow because it’s GM.
You are wrong, and I have just proven it. Be thankful. Happy Thanksgiving!
Sa Vant
November 25th, 2010
5:09 pm
For much less than the kind of absurd money this hippie-turkey auto costs, you could get a VW GTI, a vehicle that combines turbo-power, handling, utility and good gas mileage.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 25th, 2010
6:19 pm
Cars that people WANT don’t need taxpayer-funded rebates to sell.
GM Volt: Coal-powered turd with a 40 mile range.
Adam
November 25th, 2010
6:30 pm
LBB: There you go about the range, proving that you have only heard and repeated something. The 40 mile range is not true, and I and several others in this very post have told you that already. There is no “range” on a hybrid, plus it goes a lot further on a full charge than 40 miles. Get your facts straight. Again.
Adam
November 25th, 2010
6:32 pm
By the way LBB, what PEOPLE want is not the same as what YOU want. That’s one of the first rules of business. Everyone is different and wants something different. Clearly, you have no concept of this.
Sa Vant
November 25th, 2010
10:07 pm
The range issue is not the prime reason for why it will flop. It is neither stylish nor powerful, but the main strike against it is simple market economics: It is way overpriced for the features it promises.
Not good value for the money. That a few auto journalists have a hard on for it is totally meaningless as far as translating into real sales to real people. These lemmings will continue to flock to the Civic (even though the VW Jetta is completely superior).
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 25th, 2010
10:08 pm
GM says the range is 40 miles on a full charge. Pathetic.
Adam
November 26th, 2010
9:53 am
There IS NO RANGE ISSUE. It’s a HYBRID!
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 26th, 2010
12:46 pm
There IS a lameness issue though…40 miles until the turd turns back into a dirty, polluting, gas powered GM POS.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 26th, 2010
4:24 pm
Mr.Lassa is clearly an unhinged, hate filled libbtard as demonstrated by his statement personally attacking Mr. Limbaugh, who could buy and sell Lassa’s rag if he chose to.
Adam
November 26th, 2010
7:34 pm
Yes, clearly fighting back against someone attacking you makes you a spineless liberal.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 27th, 2010
10:06 am
EPA says the “Car of the Year” goes 35 miles on it’s battery before needing to connect to a coal fired power plant for a recharge. EPA finds that after the battery dies it gets 37 mpg burning gasoline.
BT55
November 28th, 2010
12:51 am
Mr Limbaugh is in negotiations to supply the Santa Ana Winds in So. Ca. (hot, dry,abundant, and delivered from an improbable place).
Adam
November 28th, 2010
12:32 pm
Wow, 37 MPG was better than I expected. Nice.
Lil' Barry Bailout
November 28th, 2010
10:05 pm
Not compared to the Toyota Prius…51 MPG and it costs about $19,000 less than the Volt.