Obama odds in 2012 look better and better
U.S. Rep. John Boehner
John Boehner, who is likely to become the next speaker of the House, went on Sean Hannity’s radio show Wednesday to offer a preview of what to expect:
“This is not a time for compromise, and I can tell you that we will not compromise on our principles,” Boehner said….
As for Obama’s own agenda, Boehner promised, “We’re going to do everything – and I mean everything we can do – to kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can.”
Meanwhile, according to a newly released Bloomberg poll:
Four out of five Americans want compromise. The Republicans don’t dare even entertain compromise. This is playing right to Obama’s strength. He will come across as calm, rational and reasonable. The Republicans will either come across as angry and aggressive, or they will deeply disappoint their own base.
Obama will also have history on his side. As National Journal points out, presidents who lose control of Congress in their first midterms tend to gain a political advantage:
“It’s occurred three times in the past 100 years, and in each case the minority party that took control watched the supposedly vanquished president win reelection just two years later. First, Harry Truman in 1948 (after losing 55 House and 13 Senate seats in 1946); second, Dwight Eisenhower in 1956 (after losing 18 House and two Senate seats in 1954, creating Democratic majorities that would last in the Senate until 1980 and in the House until 1994); and finally, Bill Clinton in 1996 (after losing 54 House and eight Senate seats in 1994).”
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
920 comments Add your comment
Real American
October 28th, 2010
3:09 pm
Sid farcas” Why is unemployement 6% Mn, Ks, Wy, Co, NE? Could it be their Gov took the Bail out money and used it the way it suppose to? But 8 years under Sonny and crooks and you idiots want to give them a second chance.
The Leg Lamp is a "major award"....
October 28th, 2010
3:10 pm
If the Democrats want a sure bet to secure the POTUS through 2020 someone will first have to convince Obama to not seek a second term. Hillary would be a sure thing.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:10 pm
Jay 3:06 – that was my earlier point. Finance 101. Take Harry’s trade giving you 300 to 1 (you go long Obama) and offset by going short Obama on Intrade (making an equal trade).
You’d get rich if Harry has enough $ to bet….
Nice Guy
October 28th, 2010
3:11 pm
Jay – “Why would I take 3-2 odds in Obama’s favor when Harry here is willing to give me 400 to one against?”
I guess jm doesn’t yet know that you are an Obama homer and that you think he will get re-elected. 400 to 1 could make you rich Jay, rich I tell ya.
The Leg Lamp is a "major award"....
October 28th, 2010
3:11 pm
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:09 pm
So I guess you prefer “we won”. If so, you’ll probably have it shot back to you in January.
Harry Callahan
October 28th, 2010
3:11 pm
Jay
October 28th, 2010
3:06 pm
jm, as to intrade:
“Why would I take 3-2 odds in Obama’s favor when Harry here is willing to give me 400 to one against?
Right Harry? Your offer still good?”
Glad you guys can recognize sarcasm and/or hyperbole when you see it. NOT. But I’ll bet you any amount you care to bet straight-up.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:11 pm
Jay 3:06 – point being, you make the spread with no risk…. free money (or as they say in finance, “free arb”)
Nice Guy
October 28th, 2010
3:12 pm
“I still say there’s a good possibility that it would have been prevented if gore was pres.”
Mick, you really are the gift that keeps on givin’ aren’t you.
@@
October 28th, 2010
3:12 pm
A liberal’s response to an “Amigos de Patriots” campaign ad.
As far as the hispanic vote is concerned, I’m not sure where this dude is getting his info but he is grossly mistaken. The hispanic vote is solid Democratic, especially here in Ca. It is why Whitman and Fiorina will lose. But don’t blame that on the Dems. The GOP has done NOTHING to reach out to this GROWING demographic. Over the long term (they are reproducing, whites are not) the GOP will pay.
Reproducing so white liberals don’t have to?
Did he/she just call Latinos rabbits?
The things that a liberal will spout before their brain is engaged.
It never ceases to amaze.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:13 pm
Harry – “But I’ll bet you any amount you care to bet straight-up.”
Does that mean 50-50 odds?
The Leg Lamp is a "major award"....
October 28th, 2010
3:13 pm
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:08 pm
“I still say there’s a good possibility that it (9/11) would have been prevented if gore was pres.”
Well then you, sir, have no credibility from this point on. “No soup for you, come back 1 year”.
Nice Guy
October 28th, 2010
3:13 pm
“free arb”
As in free arbitrage, jm?
NowReally
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
October 28th, 2010
2:55 pm
Well one thing is for sure. Obama won the election fair and square; it was an all out blow out. I’ve never seen a candidate make a concession speech so quickly. But it was a very dignified concession, by McCain, I might add.
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
nice guy@3:12
Had to throw that in just to let you tingle….
TaxPayer
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
Since Boehner has promised that there will be no compromise perhaps we will actually start making some headway on reducing the deficit since that would mean that there can be no negotiations on new tax cuts to implement in place of the ones that the Republicans, with Bush, designed to expire this year in order to pay for them. That’s weird, I know but the Republicans actually had to end their own tax cuts in order to pay for their tax cuts because they just could not bring themselves to cut spending on things like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or the prescription drug company benefit or the ag bill, etc. Those Republicans were just being so liberal that they had to even borrow money from communist China in order to cover their spending spree. Of course that means that we also get stuck with the interest tab on that borrowed money too. Wow. Wasn’t that generous of those Republicans.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
Nice Guy – yep.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
Mick
Im still waiting on a response from my 3:05 post
Doggone/GA
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
“If you wish to change things then please contact your representative and ask him or her to introduce a Constitutional Amendment”
And it doesn’t even require that. The Electoral College is Constitutional, but how the Electors are apportioned is a States issue. All that would need to be done is for all the states to apportion their Electors by percentage of popular vote in their state, instead of “winner takes all” – no Constitutional amendment needed.
stands for decibels
October 28th, 2010
3:16 pm
Her reward? She is still allowed to be free and spew her lies and hate. I’d say she came out pretty darn good.
…huh? as opposed to what, being jailed for sedition like you’d expect in some third-world dictatorship?
NowReally
October 28th, 2010
3:16 pm
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
October 28th, 2010
3:10 pm
If the Republicans want a sure bet of losing; please put forth Sarah Palin as your candidate in 2012. She is truly the gift that can’t be returned.
Ernesto
October 28th, 2010
3:16 pm
As long as we have a moderate president I’m ok. Republicans do not have anyone electable. So it’s possible that Obama might get a second term.
Harry Callahan
October 28th, 2010
3:16 pm
Real American
October 28th, 2010
3:03 pm
“Harry C. Whiteman: The truth hurts, Why do Obama have to answer to the media because he is asking for Latino, blacks vote? When he was at Ohio State, Boston College, I did not hear no one say he is trying to get white students vote”””‘
Please white bigots, look up the word socialist before you accuse the President. Most of you bigots want state control, that why you call him that, well some Americans have seen how states have screwed up, (Civil Rights)(Bail out money) we dont want a person like Nathan Deal who voted against civil rights to control us, we have enough bigots here in state govenment.”
Mr. Real…seriously…I call Obama a socialist because he is one. It’s not a black or white issue. I also call him a racist because he is one. If he weren’t a racist, he would have got up and walked out on any one of Jeremiah Wright’s ignorant, hate-fiiled racist rants that he passes off as “sermons.” But no…not only did he sit there every Sunday year after year and listen to that crap, he freely admits that he considers Wright a mentor. So everytime you call me, or anyone else who disagrees with your ignorant liberal politics a racist, you’re just perpetuating the exposure of your own bigotry and stupidity.
The Leg Lamp is a "major award"....
October 28th, 2010
3:16 pm
NowReally
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
You’re right, it was a blowout, and yes, McCain was very dignified.
By the way, why was the National Guard put on call in some areas in the event that Obama lost? Surely his supporters wouldn’t have rioted or anything like that, right? I mean, the left NEVER does anything like that, right?
Nice Guy
October 28th, 2010
3:17 pm
jm, does it get any better than a free arbitrage?!?!?
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:17 pm
Anyone dishing out soup who is known as a leg lamp deserves to eat alone..
md
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
Seems neither party really gets “it”. 2/3’s of the country at any given time is against BOTH agendas, and that is why the cycle will continue.
As for 2012 – may depend on the makeup of congress – the only way to currently neuter both agendas is to keep them both neutral – when either gets their way, the car stays in the ditch, just happens to be a different ditch.
White man
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
Harry you are the biggest bigot on the blog. Please go home!
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
Palin’s got a 19% chance on being the Republican nominee currently, from the bookies.
Only Romney’s ahead of her with 27% odds.
The Leg Lamp is a "major award"....
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
TaxPayer
October 28th, 2010
3:14 pm
Boehner has said no compromise on principles. Actually I find that somewhat refreshing. Others will w h o r e (didn’t mean to steal your thunder, Jerry Brown) their principles to the highest bidder.
Nice Guy
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
“If the Republicans want a sure bet of losing; please put forth Sarah Palin as your candidate in 2012.”
The Repubs know this and understand that she is not presedential material. However, she wields a lot of influence so she is an important tool.
The Leg Lamp is a "major award"....
October 28th, 2010
3:19 pm
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
And neither of them will represent the GOP in the next presidential election.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:19 pm
Nice Guy – No It Does Not. Gets me too excited to type correctly. Not many of those around these days…. djdkl;a;lkjdf
White man
October 28th, 2010
3:19 pm
Sorry Harry I meant “real american”…
Red Force
October 28th, 2010
3:19 pm
–But he didn’t actually come out and say the Republicans are the enemies–
Nah, PrezBo just stated in third person terms “our enemies.” I’m *so* sure you libs gave as much slack to Rush Limbaugh when he said he wanted Obama (Obama’s socialism) to fail. I have to hand it to you libs…you folks can actually push a rope and make it work.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:20 pm
Leg Lamp 3:19 – I’m inclined to agree. But the hard money says you’re right too. Since their combined odds are only 65% (ie, 65% chance it is someone else)
Nice Guy
October 28th, 2010
3:20 pm
jm @ 3:19
LOL.
williebkind
October 28th, 2010
3:21 pm
If he gets reelected, what do you have? First black president to hold two terms! What do you have?
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:21 pm
mark t
The numbers don’t add up the way you say and about obama signing a 410 billion omnibus today – haven’t read about it yet.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:22 pm
Well Mick, In every debate there has to be a loser, sorry bud, maybe next time…If you care to see the answer to the ridculous question you posed on the Omnious Bill check my 3:05 response
Harry Callahan
October 28th, 2010
3:22 pm
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:02 pm
“harry
Good point – its the way it was done, delay and hastert arm twisting, deal making, sound familiar? Also, after all that, the deal was a dog for the people.”
All wealth re-distribution deals are a dog for hte people paying hte bills, and gravy for those on the receiving end. How is the prescription drug deal any different from Obamacare, welfare, food stamps, he Earned Income Tax Credit, etc???
williebkind
October 28th, 2010
3:23 pm
In two more years Obama will be just another old black guy but Sara will still be hot!
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:23 pm
Oh there you are…I didnt say anything about him signing anything today
NowReally
October 28th, 2010
3:23 pm
The Leg Lamp is a “major award”….
October 28th, 2010
3:16 pm
Because we knew that he was definitely the best candidate. McCain blew his chance when he chose the dark haired bimbo. Just kidding, she’s a mama grizzley, if their is a difference.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:24 pm
Mick, that was the report from when it was signed…but I assure you it was signed
Harry Callahan
October 28th, 2010
3:26 pm
White man
October 28th, 2010
3:18 pm
“Harry you are the biggest bigot on the blog. Please go home!”
Well, that’s about the 8th time today that a sore liberal loser has responded to getting their a$$ handed to them in a debate by calling someone a racist.
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:26 pm
mark t
I could care less.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:26 pm
Try reading up on current events before trying to make an argument
@@
October 28th, 2010
3:27 pm
As I recall, Obama’s win didn’t amount to THAT big a blowout.
It’s been a HUGE blowout ever since though.
Thomas
October 28th, 2010
3:27 pm
Jay, you can whistle past the grave yard all you want. Obama has been revealed for what he is. He’s way too liberal to be elected again. And you can also uncross your fingers regarding Sarah Palin. She wont be the nominee.
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:27 pm
harry
**getting their a$$ handed to them in a debate by calling someone a racist.**
There you go again – a legend in your…..
mm
October 28th, 2010
3:28 pm
jm,
Only a wingnut could come up with a response like your 3:09. You folks better wait until Nov 3rd before you measure the drapes.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:28 pm
That just proves my point, when you put facts in a liberal’s face, there response…” I could care less”..maybe you can go debate a 6th grader and win, then again, probably not
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:28 pm
mark t
Try getting some FACTS before you stick foot in mouth.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:29 pm
3:20 typo 35%/65%
paleo-neoCarlinist
October 28th, 2010
3:31 pm
md, re: your 2/3 observation, there was some politico on Charley Rose this weekend, and he nailed it (checkmate). Rose asked him about viable third party candidates in 2010, specifically Bloomberg running as an independent, and he said; ‘it really doesn’t matter, because with the electorcal college being the property of the two major parties, even if the popular vote (the 2/3 of which you speak) elected a dark horse, the Dems and Reps in the house would ultimately elect the POTUS. as I said, “checkmate”. again, I refer to my lord and savior George Carlin; “the sh*t we shuffle around every four years is meaningless.”
josef nix
October 28th, 2010
3:31 pm
Those laying odds on 2012…the Romany lady says you don’t know tea leaves from crystal balls if you’re laying them this far out…says anything can, and probably will, happen between now and then,,
Disgusted
October 28th, 2010
3:31 pm
I liked the lie “compassionate conservative”, that was a good one.
When I think of a compassionate conservative, I develop an image of a well-heeled lawyer who, coming upon the body of a badly injured person, carefully leaves his business card before walking away.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:32 pm
mm – right….. I’m a wingnut. Cause I think Obama is a liberal, unlike you, who thinks he’s too conservative. uh huh.
Harry Callahan
October 28th, 2010
3:33 pm
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:27 pm
“harry
There you go again – a legend in your…..”
MIck…I hate to break this to you, but…in a real intellectual debate, calling someone a racist, especially in the absence of any supporting evidence, doesn’t really score any points.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:33 pm
So youre saying he didnt sign $410 Omnious Bill?…WOW…Im through debating an idiot
JustMe
October 28th, 2010
3:33 pm
Of course Americans want compromise but not to accommodate the far-left agenda that’s been pushed by Obama, Reid and Polosi.
True, but neither do they want a far right agenda. Compromise is when both parties (and I emphasize BOTH) meet in the middle … not when one party waits for the other party to come to their side. Both sides of the aisle have a tendency to do the latter much more than the former and unforunately I think it will continue.
md
October 28th, 2010
3:33 pm
“The latest forecast by University of Virginia’s respected Larry Sabato is that the vast majority of Democratic losses in the House next Tuesday will be in the category of Blue Dog Democrats.”
That tells me that those voters prefer moderates. Also tells me they prefer not to vote for any too far left individuals.
GOP Lost in space they can't say yes for working class
October 28th, 2010
3:34 pm
Let see The GOP’ any thing for worker? No all for big Business yes! and most of Georgia makes under 50K. And they vote like they are the man that make 500k. Any thing for the poor working class from the GOP? All I can say the red Pill and the Tea must be some bad stuff to mess the mind up not to see what is good and Bad for them!! The GOP matrix MR. Anderson
ken R
October 28th, 2010
3:34 pm
Oh Jay , wake up it’s time to go to work, you were just having a bad dream. LOL
Dan
October 28th, 2010
3:34 pm
yes americans want compromise and that is precisely why the person who said the other party should get in the back seat is going to get tossed. If Obama split the difference between reason and his position he would still be center left
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:34 pm
wingadingdingdong wingadingdingdong.
mm thinks I’m wingnutty. I guess I do find wingnuts entertaining. Except they’re so exasperating. Like mm.
mm, don’t eat too many of the read mm’s.
TaxPayer
October 28th, 2010
3:35 pm
Boehner has said no compromise on principles. Actually I find that somewhat refreshing. Others will w h o r e (didn’t mean to steal your thunder, Jerry Brown) their principles to the highest bidder.
I hear Boehner is still planning on stumping for (as opposd to stomping on) Rich Lott. Don’t you just love a man of principles.
Harry Callahan
October 28th, 2010
3:36 pm
Disgusted
October 28th, 2010
3:31 pm
“I liked the lie “compassionate conservative”, that was a good one.
When I think of a compassionate conservative, I develop an image of a well-heeled lawyer who, coming upon the body of a badly injured person, carefully leaves his business card before walking away.”
What does a compassionate liberal do in that case…go pass a law to raise taxes on the lawyer and use that revenue to pay for a study to means-test the badly injured person, and determine if he/she is deserving of any help?
ken R
October 28th, 2010
3:36 pm
GOP lost, do you and most people work for tiny companies or?????????????
White man
October 28th, 2010
3:36 pm
GOP Lost in Space…..hey answer me this. All of those big “evil big business” corporations…..who do you think they employ?
Balance Our Budget
October 28th, 2010
3:37 pm
Jays Headline
Obama odds in 2012 look better and better
Is he trying to make himself feel better about the bloodbath coming on tuesday
Sid Farcas
October 28th, 2010
3:38 pm
Real American
October 28th, 2010
3:09 pm
Sid farcas” Why is unemployement 6% Mn, Ks, Wy, Co, NE? Could it be their Gov took the Bail out money and used it the way it suppose to? But 8 years under Sonny and crooks and you idiots want to give them a second chance.
This person is a perfect example of why pot should not be legal. Are you for real!? So 45 other states were corrupt in how they spent their money? WOW, drink the kool-aid son, drink the kool-aid.
Mick
October 28th, 2010
3:38 pm
mark t
I never said anything about the omnibus bill – you did. First you said you didn’t then you said you did….holy canoli…as for the personal insults and name calling…leave it be my brother…we are all here to learn.
md
October 28th, 2010
3:39 pm
pnc,
It is a pretty clear historical pattern – 4 and 8 for the most part with 12 sprinkled in.
Yet, the big 2 always see an election as their mandate and validation of their agendas, when in reality, it is more than likely anything but. The big 2 are like their followers – wearing blinders and interpreting all votes as FOR…………
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:39 pm
Harry, what are the odds? Or we can scrap the game. I’m not trying to pester you.
Sid Farcas
October 28th, 2010
3:40 pm
Balance Our Budget
October 28th, 2010
3:37 pm
Jays Headline
Obama odds in 2012 look better and better
Is he trying to make himself feel better about the bloodbath coming on tuesday
No, he is trying to convince himself that Obama is really a good president. Jay has accepted the bloodbath. I have a friend that volunteers at a suicide hotline and he talked Jay out of slicing his wrists recently.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:40 pm
I think GOP Lost in Space and Real American went to the same school..must be one of those schools that failed miserably
paleo-neoCarlinist
October 28th, 2010
3:41 pm
for all you “players” out there. let me share something with you, when a bookie says Palin has a 19% chance or Romney has a 27% chance of being the GOP nominee, or becoming POTUS, they are no basing these odds on any statisical data or mathematical formulas. they are setting line to attract bets FROM BOTH SIDES. if more people “bet” Palin will become POTUS, her odds will drop. if less bets come in, the odds will increase. as I noted earlier, check out what Karl Rove has to say about Palin’s chances and note he didn’t offer odds, he simply listed a couple “weaknesses” she would need to address before establishing herself as a front-runner, and in his opinion, her forey into the world of “reality TV” as well as comments about political office present a challenge. of course, he could be a shill for the bookies, but I doubt it
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:42 pm
Republicans have ZERO credibilty. Anyone? Show you are right, but you know it too. But they have rehab and now they are goofy t-republicans that are known goofy or found their way, again, and again and again, I promise not to lie anymore.
@@
October 28th, 2010
3:42 pm
Barack Obama takes high road with unappeasable foe Jon Stewart
It looked promising for the president at first, but there is no heart more bitter than that of a disappointed lover
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/28/barack-obama-jon-stewart-daily-show
Lover?
If they’re talking about women, there are three kind that’ll love a man.
A wife.
A whore.
A prostitute.
Would jay’s left-wingers like to step up and identify with one of the three?
He may feel that he is above making jokes about non-masturbating witches standing for office, but the higher the road he takes, the greater the suicidal plunge.
Instead, viewers were left with the feeling of yes. But.
Obama’s cliff or yours?
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:43 pm
May man Daniels is only running at 8% versus Thune at 18%. Crapola. The last thing we need is another Senator as pres (Thune).
I’ll take Pawlenty at at 11% if I have to.
paleo-neoCarlinist
October 28th, 2010
3:44 pm
foray
josef nix
October 28th, 2010
3:44 pm
paleo
Are you a betting man?
Sid Farcas
October 28th, 2010
3:44 pm
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:42 pm
Republicans have ZERO credibilty. Anyone? Show you are right, but you know it too. But they have rehab and now they are goofy t-republicans that are known goofy or found their way, again, and again and again, I promise not to lie anymore.
All we have to do is show that we have more creditability then the dems. We will do that on Tuesday and that will be our proof slapnut. Argue that one!
Aubrey
October 28th, 2010
3:45 pm
Some senior personalities in the Democratic Party have discussed with President Obama’s advisers the possibility of him not running for re-election in 2012, according to an influential Democratic Party operative speaking on condition of anonymity.
The operative, who is close to the Democratic leadership, did not indicate whether Obama was undecided about running again.
Any such decision would need to be made at a later date based on a number of factors, such as any change in poll numbers after the midterm elections, the operative said.
There are some within the Democratic leadership who believe at this point it would be best for the party if Obama did not seek re-election in 2012, and more than one discussion has been held on the matter with Obama’s top advisers, according to the party operative.
big un
October 28th, 2010
3:46 pm
Are you kidding me? You must have rubbed Cynthia’s Bull$hitzer Prize.
Joe Frank
October 28th, 2010
3:46 pm
Ahy don’t we get some opinion pieces from someone besides you same old hacks svery day? Can’t the AJC afford to pay a national columnist? Geez, you guys are tired.
josef nix
October 28th, 2010
3:46 pm
Jefferson
Zero credibility for GOP? Log Cabin Republicans DADT…not a Repub myself, but let us DO give credit where credit is due…
md
October 28th, 2010
3:46 pm
“Republicans have ZERO credibilty. Anyone?”
Care to answer why a pendulum swings??? Especially a political pendulum??
Sid Farcas
October 28th, 2010
3:47 pm
Aubrey is corrct. I have $100.00 that Obama comes up with a reason not to run and Hillary steps in. Just what the party will want.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:47 pm
Ok Mick, I’ll say it slow for you…You asked $410 dolloar Ominous Bill, when was that signed?…I provided you with info, sorry I didnt put the exact date but if you would like I will provide to you,
You then said the numbers dont act up and that you havent heard about any bill signed today.
Thats when I responded that I didnt say anything about a bill being signed today, the link said “signed this afternoon” because it ws from the day it was signed…
Is that better, I feel like Im talking to my 8 yr old daughter
md
October 28th, 2010
3:49 pm
As for 2012, the next 2 big issues on the agenda for Barry and the gang are amnesty and crap and trade – both issues that a majority of Americans are not in favor of. These get implemented, it won’t matter what the other guys do…………
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:49 pm
So far one answer, all others dodge the truth.
Mark T
October 28th, 2010
3:50 pm
Fact is the numbers do add up….
787 billion stimulus
410 billion Ominous
950 billion healthcare….
Do the math
jt
October 28th, 2010
3:51 pm
Demos getting desperate.
Check this commercial out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9SbDnoaYX8&feature=player_embedded
Sestak should have taken the dog poo and “camouflaged” his face with it… that way he could have hidden from his voting record a lot easier.
The equally outlandish retort.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyA1Co113kQ&NR=1
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:51 pm
The percentage is so small it will not rount to 1.
Sid Farcas
October 28th, 2010
3:51 pm
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:49 pm
So far one answer, all others dodge the truth.
Read my answer Jefferson. Your question is to damn easy to answer. The majority will answer real loud on 11/2.
Big D
October 28th, 2010
3:52 pm
Socialism / Socialism…Definition:
This is for all the D.A. lefties that cannot read a dictionary, or grasp what they have read.
A social system in which the means of producing and distributing goods are owned collectively and political power( government) is exercised by the whole community.
To place under public( government) ownership or control.
To convert or adapt to social needs.
If you are not in some alternative universe this is EXACTLY what Obama and the left IS doing.
jm
October 28th, 2010
3:52 pm
I say the Republicans just stop raising the debt ceiling…. although that would be a gov’t shutdown. but if that’s what it takes….
Sid Farcas
October 28th, 2010
3:53 pm
Jefferson
October 28th, 2010
3:49 pm
So far one answer, all others dodge the truth.
Big D, I have posted this definition before. Libtrds can not comprehend actual facts. it burns their eyes.