Protester stomped in Ky. Senate race
Since this is pretty clearly going to dominate the innertubes today:
I have no doubt whatsoever that Rand Paul and most of his supporters are appalled by what happened last night. However, I also have no doubt that in this incident and others yet to come, we are reaping the harvest of hatred sown by overheated rhetoric that treats political disagreement as betrayal and political opponents as a dire threat to America’s existence.
And on that point, it’s good to get at least SOME bipartisan agreement, notably here and here.
On the other hand, there have also been attempts to justify it and to excuse it or even celebrate it.
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
646 comments Add your comment
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:37 pm
Jay –
LOL. As usual, you spend lots of time on grade school nonsense while you keep ducking the very straight forward question for which you have no answer. (I can tell because when you think you have an answer you gleefully and quickly respond. When you are stone cold busted as a hypocrite, you scurry away or whine about process. I can set my watch to your activities. Your personal behavior is almost as predictable as your generic and tedious columns.)
Look, we all know that you have a rolodex full of excuses for ducking me, but why duck Thomas? I know why and it is the same reason you duck me.
Please tell us more about the excesses of the rhetoric of others while you put a spotlight on that rhetoric. Haven’t gotten my fill of hypocrisy today.
Jay
October 26th, 2010
1:37 pm
Thomas, I can’t explain why the sky looks blue, either. People are free to come to their own conclusions about what I do, and I am more than happy to let my record speak for itself.
ME.
October 26th, 2010
1:37 pm
@NotMike,
Did you really make those false allegations that Jay mentioned?
Don't Forget
October 26th, 2010
1:37 pm
jm, wow I didn’t know that. Interesting term to use given the time FDR was in office. I wonder if there was sympahty for the Czar’s given the bolshevik revolution.
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:38 pm
Speaking of yellow cake. Anyone else freaked out about Iran’s activities?
Gordian knot for Obama…. I think he should call in Will Shortz, puzzlemaster.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:39 pm
Jay –
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from NotMike.”
Good lord you are a hypocrite. The same guy who declares that he would no longer responds to me demands a quick response.
Sorry, hack. I am running a business while I am schooling you. Your “job” is my coffee break.
Don't Forget
October 26th, 2010
1:39 pm
lol, notmike is having a notgood day.
ME.
October 26th, 2010
1:40 pm
@NotMike,
Are you a politician? I only ask because of your reply to Jay @1:37? All I want to know is did you do what Jay is accusing you of doing?
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:40 pm
Don’t Forget 1:37 – the B.R. predates FDR by a good 16 years, but was obviously relevant at the time. I had the same thought you did. Very interesting choice to pick a term like that at a time like that.
A very different time indeed.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:41 pm
Jay –
“Does that mean you’re not going to address the false allegations you made, NotMike?”
What are you babbling about? Please be specific. You better be quick about it or I will make an empty snarky remark like you.
BTW: are you ever going to answer my question? You are writing a novel to me, but you have ducked my question for over an hour, despite your hypocritical demands for prompt responses from me.
beavis
October 26th, 2010
1:42 pm
msears21
Bush may have “signed” the 1 trillion, or 787 billion depending on who you ask, TARP fund that was put up by a DEMACRATICLY controlled house and senate. The dimacrats think that the sheeple are so stupid that we did not notice that all they did was steal that money from us and give it to their supporters, and how many jobs were created? ZERO, how many were “saved” only the rich corperate idiots who already proved that they don’t know how to handle money. Good job losers….
Big D
October 26th, 2010
1:42 pm
Jay…
One radical “professional” agitator and you latch onto this like a chicken on a worm…
like it is REALLY news worthy in larger scope of what is wrong with this country.
I’ll ask you again…do a piece on something like Pickford and Glickman …
let’s see if you are a reporter or as I believe a hack getting a pay check.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:42 pm
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from Jay.”
Jay
October 26th, 2010
1:42 pm
NotMike, I have and will continue to respond to Thomas.
You, on the other hand, have some explaining to do before we go any further.
Why did you make up such a cock and bull story about me and post it on this blog?
Bosch
October 26th, 2010
1:43 pm
“You better be quick about it or I will make an empty snarky remark like you.”
Yeah, that would be a first for mike or notmike.
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:44 pm
notmike – did you accidentally commit blogocide? Or just have difficulty with your internet connection.
This is a he said / she said thing. Jay says he didn’t ban you. You say he did. What say you notmike?
thomas
October 26th, 2010
1:44 pm
Jay
October 26th, 2010
1:37 pm
For the record i agree with the idea of your article. The climate has became way to heated for intellegent discussion to prevail…
I find it very dishonorable of you to exclude yourself from any of the blame though.
That displays a new level of arrogance.
it is your job to create heated discussions but instead of choosing to man-up you deflect blame to others.
i honestly thought more of you and expected you to be a more honorable man.
A true let down.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:44 pm
“All I want to know is did you do what Jay is accusing you of doing?”
As I said at 12:10:
“Of course, in addition to supplying his own over-heated and divisive rhetoric, Jay also gleefully finds the most absurd and divisive rhetoric coming from the right, thereby reinforcing the opinions of his partisan echo chamber that all who disagree with their political views are bad.
Jay’s message that over-heated rhetoric has gotten out of hand is correct. The fact that he refuses to acknowledge that he and Cynthia Tucker are as complicit as anyone on this planet in this disgusting cycle of hypocrisy is bad enough. For him to whine about it is truly pathetic.”
Jay never responded to me. Instead he ignored my question and declared victory because I had not answered in 15 minutes. Bookman is incapable of taking any action that does not involve hypocrisy.
To mike or not to mike
October 26th, 2010
1:45 pm
If notmike is not mike then who is notmike claiming that Jay promised not to respond to.
Kamchak
October 26th, 2010
1:45 pm
But you got to give him credit, he’s doing more than many people would do to make his point…
notmike is a bitter angry ex-AJC employee that haunts these blogs to vent his resentments at his former employers.
No credit is due.
Steve
October 26th, 2010
1:45 pm
Has anyone heard about the 3.8% sales tax on the sale of your home that was included/hidden in the Healthcare Reform Bill. It is effective in 2013.
Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are disgusting.
Don't Forget
October 26th, 2010
1:46 pm
jm, Iran is truly a no win situation. There’s no good solution. James Baker suggested we simply extend the “nuclear umbrella” to the middle east. I don’t really think the destruction of Isreal is the goal though, that’s just political rhetoric that is appealing to many in the region but would result in the destruction of Iran. Dicators aren’t martyrs. I think Iran just wants to dominate the region. 40% of the worlds oil goes through the Strait of Hormuz. Iran could shut that down and cause economic chaos but they couldn’t keep it closed unless, of course, they had a nuke.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:46 pm
“Why did you make up such a cock and bull story about me and post it on this blog?”
You keep referring to this (as you duck my question for going on an hour and a half”).
What are you talking about? I know it is very difficult for you to actually respond to anything anyone says, but I have no clue what you are talking about. Come on, you can do it.
Aquagirl
October 26th, 2010
1:46 pm
It’s a miracle! Hallelujah! notmike has been resurrected!
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:47 pm
Steve 1:45 – going to need a legit source on that one. I think that one’s hocus pocus. Although there are a lot of stupid things in the HCR bill.
RB from Gwinnett
October 26th, 2010
1:48 pm
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from NotMike”
Jay, I could publish an entire book of questions I’ve asked you and never gotten a response to, so get off your ivory tower with NotMike. Just like Beck, you’re no different, but are quite arrogant for thinking you are.
Bosch
October 26th, 2010
1:48 pm
Steve,
Yeah, I have, but it wouldn’t affect my home, how ’bout yours?
http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/a-38-percent-sales-tax-on-your-home/
Normal
October 26th, 2010
1:48 pm
Off topic, but I’m tired of Jay beatin’ up on Mike. This is a race that might be worth watching…
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/10/25/meet-earl-pomeroy-the-moderate-democrat-touting-his-health-reform-vote.html
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:48 pm
Jay –
Let me make this easy for you.
“I seek out and highlight extreme rhetoric that I then claim to be dangerous and corrosive because…..”
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:49 pm
Don’t Forget 1:46 – Baker’s idea isn’t bad. But good grief. We will be extending nuclear protection to a lot of unsavory folks….
birdhunter
October 26th, 2010
1:49 pm
Hw typical of Jay. An isolated incident that Paul condemed blamed on so call right wing hate speech. While the President of the United States declares those who don’t agree with him “enemies” and say Republicans should go to the back of the bus and not a peep out of Jay. Does the word hypocrite mean anything to you?
Normal
October 26th, 2010
1:50 pm
To be Mike or NotMike…NotMike, Please!
Don't Forget
October 26th, 2010
1:50 pm
Steve
October 26th, 2010
1:45 pm
Has anyone heard about the 3.8% sales tax on the sale of your home that was included/hidden in the Healthcare Reform Bill. It is effective in 2013.
Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are disgusting.
No steve, you are disgusting. A disgusting liar. Just like the people that spread these lies.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/aug/23/chain-email/health-care-law-sales-tax-home-sales-no/
Don't Forget
October 26th, 2010
1:51 pm
jm, yup, terrible situation all around.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:51 pm
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from Jay.”
He gave me 15 minutes to respond to him before he rolled out this crap. An hour and a half on, I still get no answer. Hypocrisy, thy name is Bookman.
BTW: How about getting Jay to start talking to me again. I changed my name from “mike” to “notmike” and for some reason that is relevant. LOL What a strange man Jay is.
Normal
October 26th, 2010
1:51 pm
birdhunter
October 26th, 2010
1:49 pm
Site, please.
What the
October 26th, 2010
1:51 pm
I don’t even want to know how thomas managed to declare Jay to be dishonorable.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:52 pm
So this Jay’s new tactic: accuse me of lying twice but absolutely refusing to tell me what I said that was false? Are you kidding me?
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:53 pm
3.8% tax – Oh lord really? The dems really threw in the kitchen sink on the HCR bill. I want to vomit. It’s not going to apply to me or many others. But really?
The principle of linking revenues and expenditures is just completely lost. At least the one theoretical thing one could say about SS is that at least some PART of it is paid for by the people who benefit from it.
WTF is this in Health Care Reform? Ridiculous.
Time for a new President and a new Congress. At least rational America will get 50% of the equation this year.
Jefferson
October 26th, 2010
1:53 pm
Most anger arises from ignorance.
Jay
October 26th, 2010
1:54 pm
At 12:50 and 1 p.m., Mike.
It is very clearly stated.
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:55 pm
Oh notmike. Did you commit false blogocide? Or did you just ban yourself from Jay’s blog?
Que pasa?
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:56 pm
Kamchak –
“notmike is a bitter angry ex-AJC employee that haunts these blogs to vent his resentments at his former employers.”
I am so thrilled that you are so obsessed with me that you have developed a mythology around me. I am flattered that you spend so much time thinking about me.
To be clear, I left the AJC a happy person to a better paying job. The AJC and its parent company, Cox are excellent employers who treat their staff really well. I never knew or cared about Jay Bookman when he was at the AJC. My distaste for Jay’s partisan hypocrisy has nothing to do at all with my time at the AJC.
Thanks for the man-love though.
Nice Guy
October 26th, 2010
1:57 pm
Jay – “I would agree with that assessment, USMC.”
Sometimes you make me, well….proud.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
1:57 pm
“It is very clearly stated.”
Let me go dig for it. You are so lame.
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:57 pm
Don’t Forget – maybe we can just drop locusts on Iran.
What the
October 26th, 2010
1:59 pm
jm,
You can do a fact check on things like steve’s comment if you want the truth.
Big D
October 26th, 2010
1:59 pm
JM…check out HR4646…brought to the floor by Chaka Fattah and endorsed by….
you guessed it N.Pelosi and the anointed Lord Obama…..
1% tax on all deposits and withdrawals on all accounts….
and these people want us to believe they want to create an atmosphere of growth….
you have got to be completely stupid to believe that.
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:00 pm
What the – I did. See below.
http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/a-38-percent-sales-tax-on-your-home/
paleo-neoCarlinist
October 26th, 2010
2:01 pm
this mike/notmike thing has a “Who’s on first?” feel to it.
Abrazos
October 26th, 2010
2:01 pm
“Has anyone heard about the 3.8% sales tax on the sale of your home that was included/hidden in the Healthcare Reform Bill. It is effective in 2013.”
Yes, I’ve seen that going around recently as well. Politifact deems it “Pants on Fire” on the Truth-O-Meter. Someone else attached the link, but here it is again. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/aug/23/chain-email/health-care-law-sales-tax-home-sales-no/
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:02 pm
Big D – you’re right. If they were focused on jobs jobs jobs, like Clinton, they would’ve done some different things. I think they care about jobs. They just don’t know how to foster the environment conducive to their creation.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:02 pm
Jay –
Oh good lord, you are a small and petty man. At the time, I genuinely believed that you were bannning me, as my posts were not going up and others were. I recognized the behavior because Cyndi Tucker did ban me. Whether or not it was a glitch or whether or not it was you banning me and then changing your mind, my posts did not go up. My reasonable assumpotion was that I was banned and I didn’t bother checking back for a while.
While traveling a few weeks ago at a hotel (and hence a different IP) I was able to post as NotMike. I posted again occasionaly when travelling, and am posting from the office today.
Big mystery solved. You spent all that time on that? No wonder you wouldn’t tell me what you were talking about.
Now that I have answered all of your silly off-topic questions, can you answer my on-topic question? Come on. You can do it.
Jefferson
October 26th, 2010
2:02 pm
See what I mean, GOP mo.
Kamchak
October 26th, 2010
2:03 pm
To be clear, I left the AJC a happy person to a better paying job.
Gonna have to assign that statement the same credibility as Penthouse forum letters.
Thank God We Escaped!
October 26th, 2010
2:03 pm
The prescient George Orwell (1984):
“The future of mankind is a boot smashing a human face”
Saw it coming…
thomas
October 26th, 2010
2:03 pm
What the
October 26th, 2010
1:51 pm
Go back and read the blog for the day…. my case is made through that.
Don't Forget
October 26th, 2010
2:03 pm
jm
October 26th, 2010
1:57 pm
Don’t Forget – maybe we can just drop locusts on Iran.
I’d see if the CIA could pose as another county and sell them defective equipment. Computers with malicious code would be ideal.
What the
October 26th, 2010
2:03 pm
What the – I did. See below
I did too. That is how I know that Steve’s statement is false.
Big D
October 26th, 2010
2:04 pm
JM and others …I think the problem with the tax is …why is it in a “HEALTH CARE BILL” other than….you guessed right again…GROW GOVERNMENT…see how easy that was.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:05 pm
Jay –
Let me make this easy for you.
“I seek out and highlight extreme rhetoric that I then claim to be dangerous and corrosive because…..”
To your earlier point, people can read and make up their own mind. People see me responding to every point you make, regardless of how petty and irrelevant. They also see you ducking a very Germaine question.
But I guess, “It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from Jay.” LOL
What the
October 26th, 2010
2:05 pm
thomas,
I have no need to go back and read the blog for I have every confidence that your claim that Jay is dishonorable is a load of bull.
Jefferson
October 26th, 2010
2:05 pm
That’s how bills work Big D, no change there. How did the Bush tax cuts get passed ?
thomas
October 26th, 2010
2:05 pm
So the truth is that there will be a 3.8% tax on any profit made over 250,000 bucks for an individual home sale and over 500,000 for married couples home sale.
Correct?
thomas
October 26th, 2010
2:06 pm
What the
October 26th, 2010
2:05 pm
Ok, that is your right and your opinion.
Would you mind telling me how you arrived at that, any facts or comments?
Or is it just your partisian gut?
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:07 pm
Typical Bookman. He poses an irrelevant question, harps on it, refuses to even tell me what it is, whines that I don’t respond fast enough and then ignores the rebuttal.
When Jay was a kid, he walked off the field if his team was losing. Old habits die hard.
Bosch
October 26th, 2010
2:08 pm
Big D,
Because it’s investment income — and that tax is for Medicare — get it? Medicare? Health care?
Normal
October 26th, 2010
2:08 pm
Big D,
I don’t see how Government can’t help to grow with all that fertilizer
in DC…just sayin’
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:08 pm
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from Jay.” But why should today be any different than the ones previous?
Jay the precious pundit is here to ask the questions, not answer them.
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:09 pm
For the people concerned about the tax- they have reason to be. Including everyone.
Since the rule isn’t indexed to inflation, anyone having an averaged priced home that appreciates at the average historical rate of inflation over the next 30 years will have a good chunk of gain subject to the tax.
Just a Thought
October 26th, 2010
2:10 pm
Jeez, dude, take a chill pill. (Wow, that’s so 80’s isn’t it)
Big D
October 26th, 2010
2:10 pm
Jefferson…I understand that, but what was the intention.
A. Help the economy and country.
B. Hurt the economy and country.
This is what people will have to ponder when they vote next week…
Nice Guy
October 26th, 2010
2:10 pm
There must be some strong coffee being served out there….
Doggone/GA
October 26th, 2010
2:11 pm
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from NotMike”
Now really! I know you didn’t expect one!
Paulo977
October 26th, 2010
2:11 pm
Bosch
12:30 pm
That was so overpoweringly BLATANT!!! There are no But But Buts It was an outrageous display of what can happen to us when we are the targets of fear mongerers!!!
JDW
October 26th, 2010
2:12 pm
Steve wrote:
Has anyone heard about the 3.8% sales tax on the sale of your home that was included/hidden in the Healthcare Reform Bill. It is effective in 2013.
Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are disgusting.
This is an inaccurate statement. See the facts at the link below.
http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/a-38-percent-sales-tax-on-your-home/
Big D
October 26th, 2010
2:12 pm
Bosch…what happens when they quite investing…?
clue 3.8% of nothing is nothing….
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:12 pm
Jay –
You gloated ” “It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from NotMike.” after 15 minutes. You are coming up on two hours without a response. Come on. Live up to the standards that you set for others. For once.
We all know you are there. We were having a real time chat just a few minutes ago.
How bout this? Don’t bust others for not responding within 15 minutes when you don’t respond at all. It just makes you look like more of a hypocrite.
Minister James
October 26th, 2010
2:13 pm
Shup-up sheetheads.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:13 pm
Doggone –
Stay with me, fanboy. I was quoting Jay directly.
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:13 pm
thomas 2:05 – yes
Big D
October 26th, 2010
2:13 pm
Normal…True enough…
What the
October 26th, 2010
2:14 pm
thomas,
you proclaimed Jay to be dishonorable and when I called you out on it, you basically told me to go figure it out for myself. That is a cop out on your part. Back up your own claims. I will not try to prove your claim for you.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:15 pm
If I was a lame person very easily satisfied with myself I would trot out Jay’s lame, “Game, set, match”.
Of course, when Bookman does that, it is just a harbinger that his argument is about to be crushed.
thomas
October 26th, 2010
2:15 pm
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:13 pm
Is there language in the bill that provides for inflation or are these hard numbers?
Aquagirl
October 26th, 2010
2:16 pm
notmike’s defense: oh, THAT little incident? Ummmmm….I was a drama queen!
A+ for creativity, F for not understanding teh interweb isn’t totally anonymous.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:18 pm
What the –
Jay is dishonorable because he is a hypocrite when he whines about overheated rhetoric. Let me give you three reasons why:
1) He engages in overheated rhetoric.
2) He only cares about overheated rhetoric coming from folks who don’t share his narrow minded views.
3) He claims that this overheated rhetoric is dangerous, yet he constantly searches for such rhetoric and gets it in front of as many people as he can.
Jay is too craven to offer a rebuttal. Perhaps you can?
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:18 pm
How to avoid the tax. Just make sure and sell your house before you get too much of a gain and buy a new one to reset your basis.
Stupid gov’t. Stupid rule. people will just act to avoid it and gov’t will never collect the revenue it thinks it should.
Except for all the regular people who get gobsmacked up the head by stupid government rules.
Bosch
October 26th, 2010
2:20 pm
Big D,
“Bosch…what happens when they quite investing…?”
That old canard? Please.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:20 pm
Aquagirl –
LOL. Yeah. I am a technical illiterate. LOL
I love seeing “intellectuals” demonstrate how prone they are to baseless and false assumptions.
Tell me more, sweetie. Let me guess. I am dumb, ugly and poor right.
Anybody here want to talk about the topic, or are you all going to demonstrate your obsessive love for me. I thought you folks were supposed to represent “intellectuals”.
Jay
October 26th, 2010
2:20 pm
Mike, the electronic record does not support your version of events. It shows you posting right up to the day in which you claim to have been banned, with no posts failing to show up. When you resumed posting, you showed no surprise whatsoever that the supposed “ban” had been lifted.
Because you knew it had never existed.
As to your “question”, why, I stopped beating my wife just last week. But of course, that’s because she was out of town at the time.
It is the same “question” you have posted countless ways in various forms to which I responded probably the first 10 or 15 times or 20 times. Forgive me if I recognize a brick wall when I see it. You have a bizarre fixation, sir, even obsession, and I do not wish to participate in it.
Abrazos
October 26th, 2010
2:20 pm
“Sorry, hack. I am running a business while I am schooling you. Your “job” is my coffee break.”
Just an observation, but with a “business to run”, notmike is awfully generous to himself with the coffee time.
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:21 pm
thomas 2:15 – short answer, I don’t know. But not many things in the tax code are indexed to inflation, because Congress is generally dumb and also likes to build in default revenue increases. So it is unlikely they’re indexed, but I don’t know for sure.
thomas
October 26th, 2010
2:21 pm
What the
October 26th, 2010
2:14 pm
Ok,
the basic idea was that jay proclaimed there to be a problem with overheated rhetoric.
I asked him early on in the blog if he was to blame for any of that.
He said no and asked for examples of what i percieved to be his rhetoric.
i provided examples and Bookman continued to claim he was not responsible for any overheated rhetoric. To which I asked for a reason or examples of what made others rhetoric overheated and his not.
He claimed he was unable to explainwhy the sky was blue as well.
To which I called him dishonest.
B/C as I see it if you are going to criticise a group for doing something, then you should be honest enough to include yourself in that group if shown to have done similar things. Or at least be able to show the differences entirely or indegree. But Bookman was unable to do either.
i agreed with the idea of jay’s piece simply thought it was dishonest to exclude himself from those who excreate overheated rhetoric.
Apologies for asking you to explain my reason to you.
notmike
October 26th, 2010
2:21 pm
“It doesn’t look like I’m going to get an answer from NotMike”
Jay said that after 15 minutes. Of course, he doesn’t respond at all. That is because Jay is a world-class hypocrite.
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:22 pm
Abrazos –
@@
October 26th, 2010
2:24 pm
AmVet:
Then there are those like Tilli, thomas, Ben the Independent, @@, Ragnar and LydiasDad who arguably support it covertly by throwing out useless red herring *instead* of using this opportunity to rebuke the needless and irrational violence by those Tea Partiers/Republicans.
There is so much garbage like this video being RUSHED to the airwaves and internet that I have grown immune.
Gotchas…gotchas…gotchas.
They’re endless.
paleo-neoCarlinist
October 26th, 2010
2:24 pm
OK, we’re officially off the rails. what exactly is “overheated rhetoric”? is there a correct temperature for heating rhetoric? excuse me, sir; would you like that rhetoric rare, medium or well-done? seems to me rhetoric is certainly not “rare” – but rarely “well done” (rimshot). in honor of Halloween, I say; “quote the craven, nevermore…”
jm
October 26th, 2010
2:24 pm
Abrazos – he could be in the coffee business…. Starbucks employee?
Bosch
October 26th, 2010
2:24 pm
“You have a bizarre fixation, even obsession”
For real.