GOP stocking up on not-ready-for-primetime players

From Politico:

“Top Democrats are growing markedly more pessimistic about holding the House, privately conceding that the summertime economic and political recovery they were banking on will not likely materialize by Election Day.

In conversations with more than two dozen party insiders, most of whom requested anonymity to speak candidly about the state of play, Democrats in and out of Washington say they are increasingly alarmed about the economic and polling data they have seen in recent weeks….

A Democratic pollster working on several key races said, “The reality is that [the House majority] is probably gone.” His data show the Democrats’ problems are only getting worse. “It’s spreading,” the pollster said.

Not all Democrats — or Republicans, for that matter — share this pessimistic assessment 68 days before the election. Republicans need to pick up 39 seats, and polls show most voters still have a downbeat view of the GOP’s ability to govern any better than Democrats. Republicans have been out-raised and outspent at the national level and in many of the key races.

I agree: There’s a decent chance that the Dems could indeed lose the House. And I think the consequences of that would be dire both for the country and, perhaps surprisingly, for the Republican Party. Here’s why:

The results of the primary season have made it clear that the GOP base will reject any candidate who in any way suggests it is possible to compromise with or cooperate with Democrats. John McCain got that message early and survived. Lisa Murkowski, Bob Bennett, Bob Inglis and Charlie Crist did not, and were rejected by their fellow Republicans. The GOP resurgence is being driven not by program or policy but by a primal scream of “NO!”

Republicans both veteran and newcomer will go to Washington in January with that message tattooed onto their brains, and will act accordingly. No cooperation, no compromise, only all-out warfare. Their base has given them no room whatsoever in which to manuever, and they know it. Under such circumstances, reaching accommodation on issues such as the budget will be impossible. The situation will make the Gingrich-Clinton standoff seem calm placid by comparison.

And in that kind of environment, Barack Obama will thrive. He may not get much done, but he will come off looking reasonable and mainstream while the Republicans make themselves look petty and extreme, setting the stage for Democratic successes in 2012.

Time will tell, of course. But at the moment, the GOP is looking like a dog that’s about to catch the car, with no idea whatsoever about what it ought to do next.

380 comments Add your comment

Peadawg

August 26th, 2010
11:22 am

“And I think the consequences of that would be dire both for the country”

The because the country has being doing soooo well under a Democratic controlled senate/house the past 4 years! :roll:

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
11:25 am

Republicans are willing to compromise. It’s just that right now the perimeters are far-left and gonzo-left. There’s no point in compromising when you end up somewhere between those perimeters.

Saul Good

August 26th, 2010
11:29 am

It will simply be the party of “NO” shining brightly and showing just exactly HOW they have no plans to fix the economy…except to keep every bill penned by dems blocked… all while talking about Tax cuts…you know…those tax cuts that are STILL in place and have no created any jobs and have only added to the deficit.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
11:34 am

In a revolution many non combatants die..

Red

August 26th, 2010
11:34 am

Would like to see how much better a President we’ll have with the ‘foaming at the mouth’ crowd in charge of the House. I agree, PrezBo will look more measured, moderate, and in control while uncapping his veto pen.

I’d like to know what spending will be cut if the R’s take control though. WAIT! The brown folks are trying to build a community center in Manhattan! Now what was the original question?

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:35 am

Jay – from downstairs – don’t you know that anytime a Dem brings up someone is gay, they’re automatically “bashing” them???

(see: poutrage at Edwards for mentioning Cheney’s daughter)

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
11:35 am

Muckraking tea party protestor gone wild–Venezuela style

We missed an important moment at the Miss Universe pageant on Saturday
night. The outgoing Miss Universe made a little political statement on
her final catwalk that was visible to Venezuelans but probably no one
else, holding up an obsolete seven star pre-Chavez era flag. She did it
to signal distress in her country, and nowhere is that move evident than
in Venezuela’s violent crime. This week the news came out that Caracas
is the most violent city in the world, a distinction it holds over Kabul, Baghdad, Sao Paulo and Ciudad Juarez.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
11:36 am

“Time will tell, of course. But at the moment, the GOP is looking like a dog that’s about to catch the car, with no idea whatsoever about what it ought to do next.”

And that Democrat car is going downhill with no brakes.

Libertarian

August 26th, 2010
11:38 am

Yes, I’m sure if the democrats retain a majority they will be FULL of “cooperation” and “compromise.”

The only way either party will ever compromise or cooperate is if neither party has a filibuster proof majority.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
11:38 am

With the democratic majority at present most
votes are still squeakers. With a republican
majority it would stay the same.

@@

August 26th, 2010
11:40 am

Don’t know why you believe that, jay.

Obama is a classic example of saying one thing during the campaign and doing something entirely different once elected. Did the dems learn anything after being exiled “to the wilderness” (AmVet’s fave) for so long? No!

I’d like to see a mix-up to fix-up.

The dems present themselves as warm and fuzzy, when in fact the majority of Americans have seen them as anything but…

Republicans will be coming in from the cold. The American people will be keeping a close eye on them.

godless heathen

August 26th, 2010
11:41 am

I’ll be proud to pull the lever for the party of NO MORE!

AmVet

August 26th, 2010
11:42 am

Looks like I was missing out on some serious leg humping downstairs.

Or as Peter in Office Space said, “I wouldn’t exactly say I’ve been missing it.”

Jay, very good analysis of the potential fallout. But I still have doubts they will make the inroads they are convinced of.

Two thoughts. One, how in the h,e, double ell could anyone with an IQ over say 70, vote for yet “more of the same” neo-cons?

Two, how much more damage can they possibly inflict on the nation after that 8 year Reign of Error?

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
11:42 am

“No cooperation, no compromise, only all-out warfare…..And in that kind of environment, Barack Obama will thrive. He may not get much done, but he will come off looking reasonable and mainstream while the Republicans make themselves look petty and extreme, setting the stage for Democratic successes in 2012.”

Jay–you seem to be laboring under the illusion that the Democrats have extended a spirit of bipartisanship and compromise these past 1 1/2 years. Just my opinion, of course, but the backroom arm-twisting and outright bribery that resulted in the passage of the health care bill was nothing short of criminal in my book.

stands for decibels

August 26th, 2010
11:43 am

Republicans are willing to compromise.

…as evidenced by their charming willingness to accept a private insurance mandate (a la Romneycare) rather than a public option, and cap-and-trade rather than a carbon tax.

oh, wait.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
11:43 am

No soup lines, no bread lines, no gas lines, just
unemployment. the promise of jobs will rule the
election.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
11:43 am

“Looks like I was missing out on some serious leg humping downstairs.”

Don’t worry, bro, I threw one in there for you as well. ;-)

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
11:44 am

I guess focusing on the word bash allows one to ignore their gratuitous swipe. My bad, I learned long ago not to let a liberal have two choices, but I slipped.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:44 am

dB – “Republicans are willing to compromise”

Lucy and the football.

nuff said.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
11:46 am

“…as evidenced by their charming willingness to accept a private insurance mandate (a la Romneycare) rather than a public option, and cap-and-trade rather than a carbon tax.”

sfd–At the risk of being labeled repetitive, I need to remind you once again that no Republican votes have been needed, or even courted, these past 1 1/2 years.

Joe

August 26th, 2010
11:47 am

If Dems lose the House this year, I pray that Jay is right about 2012. Unfortunately, I don’t give the voters as much credit as he does. Too many of them are running around with “liberal” media drivel in their heads. The fact that they’re planning on turning the House (and possibly the Senate) over to proud Tea Party/Republican ignoramuses this fall is evidence of that.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:48 am

RW – good gracious! your delicate sensibilities!! hie thee to a fainting couch!!

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
11:48 am

sfb/d,

I said there’s no need to compromise when the limits of the debate are real bad and tragic. (Not sure about the initials. The blog nanny told me that by using b instead of d I was deliberately trying to denigrate you or something so I don’t know if I missed a message from you. I saw the b as a play on previous names, but I’ll switch if that’s your desire rather than just the nanny’s)

stands for decibels

August 26th, 2010
11:49 am

Lucy and the football.

I found a couple of nice republicans to play with! they’re reasonable! they say they’ll vote with us! hooray!

(c) 2009 & 2010

larry

August 26th, 2010
11:49 am

Sharon Angle, Rand Paul, Nathan Deal, Paul Broun, etc etc ……………

You think the voters are going to elect these clowns ?

Here is some intresting reading during the lunch break, especially for those who want to bash the stimulus plan.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599201368300

Pennsylvanian

August 26th, 2010
11:49 am

Jay is whistling by the graveyard. The Republicans will be ready to go with their agenda in January. Getting rid of Speaker Pelosi, and hopefully Senate Majority Leader Reid will be the best possible scenario for Obama to save his legacy. He will have to do a Clinton, and move to the center. He’ll be ok if he stays away from the interns….

Redneck Concert (R--and proud of it)

August 26th, 2010
11:49 am

Well, I’m awful glad FL Republicans finally caught on. I mean, if you’re a bank and you want to stop bank robberies, you don’t hire a bunch of cops. You hire a bank robber to tell you what to do. Same thing with this Republican that won the right to run for guvner. The guy headed up a corporation that stole billions from Medicare and Medicaid, so he ought to be able to stop Medicare and Medicaid fraud lickety-split.

Anyway, it’s a pretty good crop of Republicans that won the primaries. I’d like them more if they all were in favor of the Death Penalty for stuff like cheating and stealing and being librul, but you can’t have everything. At least every one of them knows how to say the word No. That’s a good start.

Time for my beanie-weenies so I’ll sign off. Be nice to each other, though I understand sometimes you got to cut loose, sort of like what always happens in church when it’s deathly quiet.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:49 am

dB – more like “they say that if we let them amend the bill, they’ll vote for it. and this time, I’m SURE they mean it”

wash. rinse. repeat.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
11:50 am

“No cooperation, no compromise, only all-out warfare. ”

So Republicans have learned from Democrats over the last two years. Sad.

“Their base has given them no room whatsoever in which to manuever, and they know it. ”

I hope what happens is, the activist, get thru the primary base gives no room to maneuver. Come general election, maybe they’ll maneuver. I know, they’ve got a few far-outs who’re seem to agree with the activist base, but heck, that hasn’t stopped far-left Dems from getting reelected year after year. Difference is, those far-left Dems come from some pretty whacky districts where the far lefters view themselves as mainstream. Or as more enlightened. I’m not sure the general voter populace of the districts where some of the more conservative Republicans won primaries see the candidate as reasonable.

But if people vote for anybody but the incumbent or anybody but the professional politician, as happened in Alaska’s senate primary, anything could happen at the last minute. Talk about a come from behind performance.

I can see Russia from my house

August 26th, 2010
11:50 am

I will not be satisfied until Madame Palin is president.

larry

August 26th, 2010
11:50 am

Ill go out on a limb and predict that one U.S republican congressman will lose in an upset here in this state.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
11:50 am

If the repubs take back the house, then it shows the great power of fox news and talk radio demogogery, all they have done is say no. It’s a 24/7 pile on obama. The country cut bush some slack after 911 but obama was not given a minute to deal with the mess inherited. Maybe it would be better if the repubs do take the house. At some point they actually have to articulate a plan besides tax cuts to help the people of this country. Meanwhile, obama just might be more ameniable to fighting for what his base wants and shooting for the moon such as; card check, stabilize social security, pull out of all foreign entaglements, public option, and finally create some kind of WPA or CCC so people can get back to work.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:52 am

“So Republicans have learned from Democrats over the last two years. Sad”

Paul. other than Soc Sec in 2005, what have the Dems ever fought the GOP tooth and nail over when they were in the minority?

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:53 am

Paul – to clarify – fought tooth and nail – and completely stymied them?

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
11:54 am

“He will have to do a Clinton, and move to the center.”

Pennsylvanian, I don’t think Obama is smart enough or humble enough to follow Clinton’s lead in that regard.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
11:56 am

Mick

“f the repubs take back the house, then it shows the great power of fox news and talk radio demogogery”

So, you’re saying the majority of all voters (Democrats and Republicans combined) are suckers?

USinUK

Point wasn’t majority or minority. In this case, it was the majority with the attitude “we won. We write the bills. Screw you. We’ll talk to you when we want someone to blame for not getting bills through.”

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
11:59 am

Paul – ““we won. We write the bills. Screw you. We’ll talk to you when we want someone to blame for not getting bills through.””

ahem.

1995, following the 1994 mid-terms.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:00 pm

“OFF TOPIC #1 – Headlines”

“Mood in Baghdad is grim as U.S. military prepares to move to “advise and assist” role”

“A Muslim soldier says he won’t deploy to Iraq and he wants to leave the U.S. military”

“Pakistani Taliban Hint at Attacks on Unarmed Aid Workers”

“Canadian Duo (Hiva Alizadeh and Ahmed Misbahuddin) Busted in Terror Plot”

“Iran Stoning Hearing Postponed Again”

Wyld Byll Hyltnyr

August 26th, 2010
12:01 pm

One problem, Jay, not at all to suggest that you are quarantined within your own liberal bubble or anything, the overwhelming majority of Americans do not want big gubbermint and they are scared by Obama’s fecklessness, arrogance, and extreme penchant to spen their money. The Republicans would lose this fall if, as you suggest, the public were of the mind to support in a mezican stand-off.

Palin/Ryan 2012 – 8675309 reasons to hope for change to that takes back Amerika!

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:01 pm

USinUK 11:53

I don’t understand your clarification.

Don’t get me wrong, there was an element of Republicans who took the ‘no’ position. But I think it could have been with the thought “we’re gonna get shut down on anything substantive, the overall bill stinks, why be party to it?” So it was a political calculation. Other places there was a lot of back and forth neither party wanted to admit to too much. Occasionally something would slip, like Dick Durbin – think it was him – referring to the hundreds of Republican amendments and suggestions that made it into the final health care bill.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:02 pm

“I will not be satisfied until Madame Palin is president.”

There go progressives with their erotic fantasies, again -

Pennsylvanian

August 26th, 2010
12:03 pm

Mick @ 11:50 – “but obama was not given a minute to deal with the mess inherited.”

Obama’s polls were very strong after the inauguration. Most folks were willing to give him a fair shot at success. But then he had to open his mouth and blast the cops over Gates. It was clear then he does not have both oars in the water. The Dems should have run Hillary. They would be in a lot getter shape now.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:04 pm

USinUK 11:59

“ahem.

1995, following the 1994 mid-terms.”

So Democrats’ idea of how to best govern is to emulate that which they condemned in Republicans?!!?

Or to copy it because they saw it, rhetoric aside, as politically effective, hmmm?

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:05 pm

Scout

““A Muslim soldier says he won’t deploy to Iraq and he wants to leave the U.S. military””

Court martial.

Prison.

Release with a dishonorable discharge.

Independent

August 26th, 2010
12:07 pm

If the repubs take back the house, then it shows the great power of fox news and talk radio demogogery, all they have done is say no. It’s a 24/7 pile on obama.

Guess that’s a lot like the KY application the legacy media gave us when they inserted Obama?

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
12:08 pm

Paul – so your idea is to have the GOP kick the Dems and treat them like second-class UN-AMERICAN/AMERICA-HATING/UNPATRIOTIC citizens for 10+ years, then reward that behavior??

Where's My Party?

August 26th, 2010
12:08 pm

LOL….oh my…..a liberal talking about “compromise” and “cooperation”. That’s funny.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
12:08 pm

what paul said – 12:05 –

this is a volunteer army. you don’t want to go to a warzone? don’t volunteer.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
12:09 pm

“LOL….oh my…..a liberal talking about “compromise” and “cooperation”. That’s funny.”

I’m surprised a republican could even spell those words (much less know what they mean)

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:09 pm

USinUK

How on earth did you get any of that from what I posted?

Saul Good

August 26th, 2010
12:10 pm

Path to congress: A building in Manhattan that 99.9999999% will never see… nor will it effect their lives in even the most smallest of ways…and hate for Mexicans (here legally or not)… it’s simply how the “right” brings their “base” to the polls. If/when they win… just like Dubya had Rove creating diversions to get him elected (gays and abortion)…well seems to me not ONE state allowed gays to be married when he was running…seems to me that abortions are still legal as well.

Hate, bigotry and fear… it’s what the “right” runs on to get out their “peeps” to the polls….

Taylor

August 26th, 2010
12:10 pm

I’m tired of hearing about the “Party of No.” It’s a ridiculous sound-bite created by Democrats to vilify Republicans. Republicans have been saying “no” for very good reasons, which they have clearly stated. And they’ve been right. It’s not to be antagonistic or adversarial, but to regain necessary and appropriate control of and restraint in a government that’s completely out of control.

The only problem is that they haven’t really presented a comprehensive and cohesive plan to compare to (and combat) the Democrats’ moronic platform. Without a clear message of a better plan, we Republicans really have nothing to grab on to and “sell” to others (mostly independents). It’s a true leap of faith that, once installed, the Republicans will, in fact, develop and implement a strong program that makes sense and meets their stated objectives of controlling spending, reducing the size of government, investing in the private sector through tax cuts and incentives, etc. I’m willing to take that leap, but I expect a lot out of my party’s representatives and, if they don’t step up, they’ll definitely be hearing from me regularly.

ty webb

August 26th, 2010
12:10 pm

the question is not if ,but can speaker pelosi cry when she relinquishes her speakership? what with all the botox and all. And has anyone ever seen her blink?

Wyld Byll Hyltnyr

August 26th, 2010
12:10 pm

Here is the bottom line, America wants legislations who will say “no” to a bad idea and they believe that evry idea Obama has had is a bad idea.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:10 pm

USinUK

I thought my point was the cycle continues not matter which party’s in power. And I’m waiting for one of them to break the cycle.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:11 pm

**So, you’re saying the majority of all voters (Democrats and Republicans combined) are suckers?**

No, I didn’t say that – you did. My point is, why would anyone be ready to hand power back to republicans? It doesn’t make sense. The democrats at least have some connection to the working man while republicans are unabashedly for the rich. Name one program that they have promoted that would help the working man?

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:11 pm

Paul:

How much you want to bet they just let him out ? You know, so we can have better relations with the Muslim community. We always reach out to them but notice they never reach out to us.

At least he will be on the FBI surveillance list.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:11 pm

Saul

“hate for Mexicans (here legally or not)…”

Source?

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
12:12 pm

Paul – 12:09 – that’s how things were from 1995-2007, particularly after 9/11 (see: the treatment of Max Cleland).

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:12 pm

Jay,

Save this article and be sure to get back with us after the midterms to see how accurate your prognosticating is. Until then, it’s a big “who knows”.

retiredds

August 26th, 2010
12:13 pm

Jay, I disagree. The fact that the Republicans have been in the minority has allowed them the luxury of saying no to everything. And as the US economy has struggled (over their mismanagement during the Bush/Cheney years) they gloat. If they take the House of Representatives then they will have to stand up and be counted. Just saying no will no longer be a luxury. They will then have to begin to participate and offer concrete solutions to today’s thorny and complicated issues and show results. That in the long run would be a good thing. It has been my experience that when one party controls the legislature and the White House (or governor’s mansion), very little good comes from that.

Also it looks like the Tea Party is on a roll right now but we’ll see how their candidates fare in the more general election. I could be wrong, but I don’t think they will fare as well as they are now only having to run against only Republican party candidates.

The party of “no” can only do that for so long. Let’s remember it has been less than two years under the current Democratic majority. If, and when, the Republicans get back some power they will be judged on what they accomplish, not their slogans. (As an aside, we have had Republicans in control of the Statehouse and Governor’s mansion in GA for eight years and it does not seem that they have any better answers than the opposition party. Some might say, “well the budget is balanced.” Yes it is, but if the state constitution did not mandate it, where do you thing GA would be … think California)

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:14 pm

Mick:

If the government would get off their backs, all of the “rich” people who expand their various industries and lots of “working men” would be doing just that ………….. working !

As it is, they are holding on to their profits and not investing until they see how long we are going to have to put up with “Che” Obama.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:14 pm

“DEM JOKES THAT PELOSI COULD DIE BEFORE NEXT YEAR ”

The dems have such a wonderful sense of humor.

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
12:14 pm

Paul – see my 11:49 – Dems have reached out to the GOP. they have compromised. they have removed legislative items that the GOP opposed … only to be kicked yet again.

so, sorry, I don’t 100% agree with your “we won, screw you” assessment of the situation.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:15 pm

Co-chair of Obama debt panel: Social Security is ‘milk cow with 310 million t*ts!’…

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
12:15 pm

Paul,

It seems to me that one of the most famous pieces of compromise legislation in recent years was NCLB. I guess people who claim compromise creates unity might be right since about everybody hates that one.

stands for decibels

August 26th, 2010
12:16 pm

can’t really stop and chat now, but I do gots to attend to one Very Serious Item:

Not sure about the initials. The blog nanny told me that by using b instead of d I was deliberately trying to denigrate you or something

For about a nanosecond, awhile back, I was going to let you have it because I took your initials to mean “stands for b—s—”… then I realized, um, the B is capitalized in “dB”…

Which is another way of saying it don’t make me no nevermind.

later.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:16 pm

Saudi couple ‘hammer 24 nails’ into maid…

USinUK

August 26th, 2010
12:16 pm

heading out … need to pick up some onions for masala burgers tonight!!

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/recipes/2010/08/11/garam-masala-chicken-burgers-tomato-relish/

have a good night!!

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:17 pm

Looking ahead to Obama losing the 2012 Presidential race, what possible Republican candidate would be acceptable to the Libs here? I don’t see any outstanding candidates right now, but am willing to give Ron Paul a second look based on his common sense stances on a lot of issues. He’s not a particularly dynamic or physically attractive person, which will likely hurt his chances.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:17 pm

scout

**As it is, they are holding on to their profits and not investing **

Thats plain unamerican. They would actually increase their profits if they invested in creating jobs which then would create more demand. Unfortunately, personal wealth and greed rule the day.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:18 pm

BIDEN READY FOR MORE SPENDING: ‘This is a chance to do something big, man!’…

StJ

August 26th, 2010
12:19 pm

Doesn’t matter who the GOP “stocks up” on. The arrogant National Socialist party has run amok the past two years with its near-supermajorities. Now the economy is in the toilet with no relief in sight, and all the Dems do is pass bills that jack up taxes on the producers of society and/or micromanage their lives. (Then they call it “helping the people”…when the truth is “helping THEIR people”).

The Republicans have one more chance to “fix” things which they had a hand in screwing up…and if they mess that up, things are gonna get real ugly real fast.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:20 pm

bruno

There is no one on the republican bench as of now – they are just victims of circumstance. Expect the party to reach out to jeb for a hail mary.

Independent

August 26th, 2010
12:21 pm

USinUK, Cleland didn’t represent his constituency, hence he was booted from office. Cleland was a liberal believing it was 1969 once again in a state that rejected left-wing liberalism. Plain and simple.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:21 pm

Mick

I didn’t ’say’ that. I asked a question. You wrote ““If the repubs take back the house, then it shows the great power of fox news and talk radio demogogery”

Only way that can happen is if the majority of voters got bamboozled by the entity you said would be responsible – Fox. So I asked if you really believe that. Or something else.

Have to be careful with the ‘rich’ comparisons. Been posted here before that for the last decade or so the majority of Wall Street fat cat contributions go to Democrats. Special interest tax preferences continue under Democratic leadership. Neither party is pure when it comes to carrying water for rich interests.

Why would people vote for a Republican? Because people are impatient. They want quick results. Economy hasn’t turned around? Give someone else a chance. Can’t say the same about expanding the war, or increasing Defense spending, ’cause in those regards Dems and Reps are indistinguishable.

Favorite quote gets posted here from time to time: “But on the central issue of are we going to have corporations be our government or are the people going to be our government, the principle difference between the Republican, Democratic parties, with certain exceptions, the principle difference is the velocity with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door.”

Ralph Nader

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
12:22 pm

sfd,

Actually it went to a name further back, but I’ll change it anyway since hardly anybody would remember that one. Plus the nanny might give me an extra scoop of ice cream for playing nice.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:22 pm

I wonder if those 1st amendment advocates who support the NYC mosque also support Glen Beck’s rally this weekend?

larry

August 26th, 2010
12:22 pm

The Republicans have one more chance to “fix” things which they had a hand in screwing up…and if they mess that up, things are gonna get real ugly real fast.

They had eight years to ” fix” things and thanks to that ” fix” we almost had another depression.

This country can not afford any more of their ” fixes” .

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:22 pm

Mick:

Disagree.

They are going to hold off until they see if Obama is unseated. They don’t want to see their investments go up in taxes and excessive interference. I can’t blame them. It’s Obama’s socialistic policies that have cost so many their jobs.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:23 pm

“Hate, bigotry and fear… it’s what the “right” runs on to get out their “peeps” to the polls….”

Saul–And the “left” is different how?? Open class warfare, dire predictions that civil rights will be taken away for minorities, and claims that Social Security will be taken away seem to be staples during election times for Democratic candidates.

@@

August 26th, 2010
12:24 pm

I know USUK has headed out, but this?

I’m surprised a republican could even spell those words (much less know what they mean)

It’s your kind of superior attitude that’s gotten the American people at odds with your party.

Keep it up! It’s so “endearing”.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:24 pm

USinUK 12:14

Just because one statement is true (what you cited) does not mean another statement (what I cited) is not true. They can both have elements of truth. As I said, there was behind the scenes cooperation and trading going on. Neither party sees it to its advantage to highlight that, though.

Joe

August 26th, 2010
12:24 pm

’m tired of hearing about the “Party of No.” It’s a ridiculous sound-bite created by Democrats to vilify Republicans. Republicans have been saying “no” for very good reasons, which they have clearly stated. And they’ve been right. It’s not to be antagonistic or adversarial, but to regain necessary and appropriate control of and restraint in a government that’s completely out of control.

B.S.!!! Senate Republicans filibuster (i.e., block up or down votes) legislation they support. Our own Johnny Isakson has even been caught at this. He has voted to block up or down votes, but then when the filibuster failed, he voted for the legislation that he tried to prevent a vote on just a few minutes earlier.

It’s not rocket science. The abuse of filibusters by Senate Republicans in both this Congress and the previous Congress (the last two years under Bush) were for one reason and one reason only–so that Dems can’t get credit for their successes. (Remember Republicans supported health care mandates before they didn’t; Republicans supported cap-and-trade before they didn’t; Republicans supported path to citizenship for immigrants before they didn’t; Republicans supported unpaid for fiscal stimulus before they didn’t,…).

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:24 pm

The Leg Lamp is a “major award” much like Cynthia Tucker’s Pulitzer and Obama’s Nobel.:

Of course not …………. the Ground Zero Mosque (also known as Obama Stadium) is so “American” while Beck’s rally is “mean spirited”.

The old double standard. What did you expect .

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:25 pm

The state’s slogan is “Don’t mess with Texas.” But the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is doing just that, and at stake is whether the Obama administration can impose its global-warming agenda without a vote of Congress.

President Obama’s EPA is already well down the path to regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, something the act was not designed to do. It has a problem, however, because shoehorning greenhouse gases into that 40-year-old law would force churches, schools, warehouses, commercial kitchens and other sources to obtain costly and time-consuming permits. It would grind the economy to a halt, and the likely backlash would doom the whole scheme.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:25 pm

paul

I was talking about catapaulting the propaganda, you know? With leaders like mcconnell and boehner, these are not people who inspire confidence or even present a plan. The media assault keeps them in the game or else they have nothing.

Independent

August 26th, 2010
12:26 pm

“Thats plain unamerican. They would actually increase their profits if they invested in creating jobs which then would create more demand. Unfortunately, personal wealth and greed rule the day.”

Must have slept through that Econ101 class. Let me guess, majored in music, art, or social science?

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
12:26 pm

Bruno,

Ron Paul has some serious albeit old baggage that would be carted all over were he ever to be the nominee and speaking of old he’s also going to be 77 in 2012.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:26 pm

Bruno:

The “D” in Democrat stands for Demagoguery !

larry

August 26th, 2010
12:26 pm

Open class warfare, dire predictions that civil rights will be taken away for minorities, and claims that Social Security will be taken away seem to be staples during election times for Democratic candidates.

Gee, i wonder where they get that from . It couldnt be from Rand Paul or Sharon Angle. Nahhhhhhhh, they are just making that up .

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:27 pm

scout

OK – but point out to me his “socialistic” policies?

Scout

August 26th, 2010
12:27 pm

Mick, Mick, Mick ………….. you are much smarter than that !

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:28 pm

“Expect the party to reach out to jeb for a hail mary.”

Mick–I sincerely hope not, because that is how I interpret the nomination of Sarah Palin for VP. As Matti and others have pointed out, there were several other, more qualified lady Republicans available for the spot if choosing a woman was important.

“Cleland was a liberal believing it was 1969 once again”

Seems to be still working for John Lewis, Independent.

“Favorite quote gets posted here from time to time”

Paul, what are you trying to do, get on AmVet’s good side by quoting Nader?? ;-)

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:29 pm

independent

I’ve done quite well thank you. Give a man a job and a paycheck and he will spend it, now thats econ 101. Hey, be my guest and defend the elite money hoarders, the great equalizer is death – it won’t be going with them.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:30 pm

“Ron Paul has some serious albeit old baggage that would be carted all over were he ever to be the nominee and speaking of old he’s also going to be 77 in 2012.”

I’ll grant you the age factor, RW. I think surveys have shown that people typically vote for the more attractive, vitalistic candidate. McCain didn’t look so hot when in the same room with Obama.

You have any good candidates in mind?

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:34 pm

**You have any good candidates in mind?**

About the only acceptable candidate I can see is jesus coming back to reclaim the kingdom. Outside of that – nothing on both sides.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:35 pm

Mick 12:25

Thanks.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
12:36 pm

I wonder if those 1st amendment advocates who support the NYC mosque also support Glen Beck’s rally this weekend?

Leg Lamp,

I doubt it since those supporters are pretty selective as to which parts of the 1st amendment they believe in.

Independent

August 26th, 2010
12:36 pm

Bruno, a basic course in civics is in order. Cleland was a senator. A senator is elected to represent an entire state. A majority of the state at election time rejected Cleland. They rejected him because he was white, a veteran, or disabled, they rejected him because he was liberal. John Lewis is a representative. A representative is elected to represent a congressional district. John Lewis’ district is a majority black district. John Lewis is re-elcted because he is black and a liberal.

Independent

August 26th, 2010
12:37 pm

Make that not because he was white, etc.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:37 pm

“Outside of that – nothing on both sides.”

Paula Cole may have said it best, Mick:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPR108kwNo4

scrappy

August 26th, 2010
12:37 pm

Leg lamp & scout –

Actually yes, support right to build a place of worship, suppport Becks right to hold a rally, support the KKK to have a rally, and support the Gay pride parade. I am not likely to ever attend any of the above, but they are still have the right to do it.

To even ask such a question shows your complete lack of understanding, one of the many things that annoys me so about the ‘conservatives’ among us.

JohnnyReb

August 26th, 2010
12:38 pm

“Anytime you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we’re denounced as being against their humanitarian goals. They say we’re always “against” things—we’re never “for” anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.” — Ronald Reagan, 45 years ago.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:38 pm

RW-(the original)

“It seems to me that one of the most famous pieces of compromise legislation in recent years was NCLB. I guess people who claim compromise creates unity might be right since about everybody hates that one.”

I’d bet even those who drafted it hate what it’s become once the federal and state bureaucracies got done with it. It’s a good club for funneling or withholding funding to advance a bureaucrat’s good ideas, though. //sarc//

@@

August 26th, 2010
12:38 pm

Bruno:

Given your exhilaration for being rid of Clayton County’s crime-ridden Riverdale, it’s no wonder you’d give Ron Paul a closer look.

His baggage?

Read about it here.

Talk about stereotyping!

Paul

August 26th, 2010
12:39 pm

Bruno

AmVet has a good side?

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
12:41 pm

RW. I think surveys have shown that people typically vote for the more attractive, vitalistic candidate

Bruno,

It’s been that way since the campaigns began to be waged on television. There have been several studies that take it back to the 1960 race where large majorities that heard the debates on radio thought Nixon did better and the reverse was true in Kennedy’s favor for television viewers of the debates.

If we’re going for attractiveness I’ll take a Palin/Bachman ticket, but somehow I think the shriek-fest from the left would have North America tipping over instead of just Guam.

andygrd

August 26th, 2010
12:43 pm

BLAH, BLAH, BLAH,

As an independent conservative, I have to tell I am not happy with either party. On the Republican side, I see no clear direction nor do I see any concrete plans. I wish a leader would emerge with clear focus. I don’t like the Tea Party Movement and the other right wing groups. It is bad for the country.

I don’t like the Democrat side either. I see no direction and no cooperation. The Democrats were elected into office, however, I don’t feel that gives them the right disregard the general populace and their opinion. And the spread of mis-information or the lack of information is a contributing factor. The distain I hold for the right wing groups I hold as well for the left wing groups..

A lot of what repeated on this site comes from either the right or the left entertainment stations. And you have to love the sources of the “facts”. A left or right media outlet, a blog, and in some cases, people make crap up…..

Where you have the former Governor Palin group on one side, you have the equally as bad Speaker of the House Pelosi side. They both scare the devil out of me…..

Watching FOX, MSNBC, CNN or the major broadcasting stations I find to be insulting to my intelligence. They are there purely for entertainment and seldom portray the actual facts. Both sides have their agenda, and they are somewhat successful selling their crap to the populace.

The really scary part, so many people believe the crap.

Okay, off my soap box and back to work….

Ivan

August 26th, 2010
12:44 pm

They’re not trying to work with them, they’re trying to defeat them. The Democrats did it in ‘06. The Republicans are doing it now. It’s nothing new.

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
12:47 pm

I though all the not ready for prime time players were waiting
on the GOP 2012 Presidential Candidate bench?

What did Arlo Guthrie call it? The “Group W” Bench?

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:48 pm

“Talk about stereotyping!”

I appreciate the link, @@, wasn’t up on Paul’s “racist” leanings. Of course, some spin could be put on that to say that he was simply pointing out the racial double standard that exists in our country. Not saying it would make his statements correct, but that spin could be applied.

“Given your exhilaration for being rid of Clayton County’s crime-ridden Riverdale, it’s no wonder you’d give Ron Paul a closer look.”

If you’re trying to paint me as some kind of racist myself, @@, you’re barking up the wrong tree. You seem to be ready and eager to apply that label to anyone who denigrates Clayton County. In the shopping center where I worked, there was a frightening armed robbery and an attempted carjacking.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
12:49 pm

The “Group W” bench would be better than the existing “F Troop” administration.

I loved that TV show, though.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
12:51 pm

** F Troop”*

Rat patrol was ahead of its time.

@@

August 26th, 2010
12:54 pm

Bruno:

If you’re trying to paint me as some kind of racist myself, @@…

Not at all, Bruno. jay’s left-wingers might tell you to go hide under your bed, but not me….I’m still here in Clayton County enjoying the good life. Getting to know, and learning to appreciate my neighbors.

You’re not the only one who denigrates Clayton County. We get it from both sides.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
12:59 pm

“jay’s left-wingers might tell you to go hide under your bed, but not me….I’m still here in Clayton County enjoying the good life. Getting to know, and learning to appreciate my neighbors.”

Discretion is definitely the better part of valor.

Maybe “appreciating” folks of different ethnicities is a new experience for you, but not for me. I grew up in integrated neighborhood and schools. And you know my feelings about black women, especially those right off the boat from Africa…..

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:03 pm

RW (the original):

Not of the Amendments are absolute.

Jefferson

August 26th, 2010
1:04 pm

I don’t like a politicians that takes endorsements and runs with it. I rather see them take a stand on their own feet.

@@

August 26th, 2010
1:05 pm

Bruno:

you know my feelings about black women, especially those right off the boat from Africa…..

All too well….they’re good for one thing, and one thing only. Were I a man, it wouldn’t be something I’d boast about though. I’ve also noticed you’re big on “spreading that kinda love around.”

Whatever, Bruno. I think you fail to see the flaws within yourself. But that’s just my opinion.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:05 pm

Scrappy:

Sure you have the right to a KKK rally but in front of a black high school?

Sure you have the right to a Gay rights march but in front of a pre-school?

Sure you have the right to Build a mosque but at Ground Zero?

As I just posted to RW ……….. none of the Amendments are absolute.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:07 pm

Mick re: “F” Troop:

The Chief ………. “Me make funny” !

Vinny

August 26th, 2010
1:07 pm

“No cooperation, no compromise, only all-out warfare.”

Sounds exactly like standard policy in the Obama administration.

Normal

August 26th, 2010
1:12 pm

Jay,
Just got the following in an e-mail.

There are many people out there calling the Muslim Community Center in NYC as “Insensitive”. Well, I think this is highly insensitive too.

Not talking about legal rights here…both have the rights, but It’s not right to be “insensitive” about one and not the other…What do you think?
——————————————————

August 28th is an important day in American history. On that day, forty-seven years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous “I Have a Dream Speech” at the Lincoln Memorial. His message gave voice to the voiceless and his vision promoted a just, equal, diverse and compassionate country.

This year, a very different message is going to be spread from the very ground on which King once stood. Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin will hold a rally at the Lincoln Memorial.

The racist, raging and hate-filled tenor of Beck, Palin and the Tea Party movement is in direct contrast to the noble vision of Dr. King. We cannot sit idly by and let King’s vision and legacy be hijacked for political purposes.

Dr. King once declared that “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter”.

We will not be silent on this matter. Honor the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s struggle for a just and equal America.

Sign our pledge and leave a comment to commit to stand with his vision, and against Beck’s hate, on August 28th.

Joining us in this effort are our friends at Alternet, Credo, Celebrate the Dream, Campaign for America’s Future, Media Matters for America, True Majority, PowerPAC and Progress Now.

Let’s stand together as a collective voice against those who wish to hijack history.

Yours,
Robert Greenwald and the Brave New Foundation team

scrappy

August 26th, 2010
1:13 pm

“Sure you have the right to a KKK rally but in front of a black high school?”

If you were part of the KKK crowd, that is probably where you would want to hold it. (but didn’t think schools were segregated anymore) As for the kids, could be a learning opportunity & appreciate the civil rights movement and be taught that they don’t have to group up to hate like those that are outside.

“Sure you have the right to a Gay rights march but in front of a pre-school?”
Not sure I get the coorelation here, unless you think that all gay people are pedophiles. Why not in front of pre-school? They are known to where rainbows and pretty colors, which stimulates the minds of youngsters. A tad young but I am sure you could explain that people wanted to celebrate with a parade and nothing more.

“Sure you have the right to Build a mosque but at Ground Zero?”

It isn’t at ground zero, it is 2 blocks away. Might not mean much here in GA, but does there. What is an acceptable distance than? If we stop someone from building a place of worship on private property just cuz we don’t like it, aren’t you afraid of the day when someone whines they don’t like it and try to prevent you from building something on private property. If enough people don’t like it, buy the property. Case closed.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:14 pm

LIMITS ON BILL OF RIGHTS:

First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition.

Except: “Fire” in a crowded theatre.

Second Amendment – Militia (United States), Sovereign state, Right to keep and bear arms.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Except: Machine guns, tanks and mortars to name but a few regulations.

Third Amendment – Protection from quartering of troops. No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Notice that the prescribed “law” can force you to quarter “troops” in “time of war”. Wouldn’t that be fun !

Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.

Exeption: There are several exceptions to getting a warrant ………. safety, hot pursuit, destruction of evidence, plain view, etc.

Tillie

August 26th, 2010
1:14 pm

The economy is spiraling down to another recession. Obama is on vacation again at Martha’s Vinyard. Biden is telling us that we are in the midst of recovery summer. Is anyone in charge? I know jay is a partisan but he is quickly becoming an irrelevant partisan.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:16 pm

President Obama has many battles to fight on the economic front: high unemployment, slowing growth, trillion dollar deficits, to name a few. Some of these issues he inherited but some he exacerbated says key members of “big business.”

This week, Intel CEO Paul Otellini and Jim Tisch, CEO of Loews Corp. both blamed the President’s policies for creating an environment of “uncertainty” that is crippling America’s economy.
The Obama administration is “flummoxed by their experiment in Keynesian economics not working,” Otellini said Monday in a speech in Aspen.

Higher taxes and more regulation add an additional $1 billion to building a semiconductor manufacturing plant in the U.S. vs. overseas, the CEO said.

As a result, “the next big thing will not be invented here. Jobs will not be created here,” Otellini said, warning of “an inevitable erosion and shift of wealth, much like we’re seeing today in Europe…this is the bitter truth.”

Loews’ Tisch made similarly themed comments in a Bloomberg interview on Wednesday. “Part of the problem is that business has very little confidence in what’s been going on and very little visibility,” he said.

Tisch has also been highly critical of the President’s response to the Deepwater Horizon explosion and leak. Loews owns 50% of Diamond Offshore Drilling – the U.S.’s largest deep-water driller.

Don't forget

August 26th, 2010
1:17 pm

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
11:46 am

sfd–At the risk of being labeled repetitive, I need to remind you once again that no Republican votes have been needed, or even courted, these past 1 1/2 years.
—————————————————————–
Bruno,
What are you talking about? Ted Kennedy died a year ago and the Dems haven’t had a filibuster proof majority since then. Basically, the Dems had 7 months of that majority, after that the R’s have been able to hold up anything they want and they have held up everything.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
1:18 pm

Beck’s 8/28 rally is very much an attempt to develop unity. Too bad “progressives” would prefer to shout it down.

@@

August 26th, 2010
1:18 pm

Murkowski Weighs Her Options

Ms. Murkowski could also run a write-in campaign and has until Oct. 28 to choose that course. But such campaigns rarely work, are incredibly complicated and run the risk of being seen as a desperate sour grapes move by an incumbent not willing to bow to the will of the voters.

In the end, Ms. Murkowski would do well to reconcile herself to the vagaries of politics. Her Senate career began in 2002 as a stroke of good luck — when she was appointed to the seat by her father while he was governor. It is likely to end because she had the bad luck to run in a year when incumbency wasn’t much of an asset and her pork-barrel ways had gone out of style in Alaska.

I’m leary of any politician who will use any means available to hold their seat of power.

The party’s over Senator Murkowski….you’ve been rejected by the voters.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:20 pm

Scrappy:

You need to get real here ………….

1) KKK March : Yes, segregation has “ended” but there are plenty of “ALL black” high schools right here in Atlanta. Where have you been? Try holding it there and see how the parents (and Al Sharpton) react which is all that is happening with the mosque ………. they just don’t want it there.

2) Gay Rights March : Just try that one with the “pre-school” parents. Go ahead ……. I double dog dare you.

3) I bet you have a convenant if you live in a subdivision that says you can’t put a “little barn” in your back yard and that you fence has to be a certain type. Accomodations are made all the time so as not to “offend” thy neighbor. The distance from Ground Zero that is permissable? Well, that is up to the New Yorkers. What ARROGANCE the mosque planners are showing to people who lost loved ones that day.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
1:21 pm

“All too well….they’re good for one thing, and one thing only”

If that were the case, I wouldn’t be the first man to feel that way.

“Whatever, Bruno. I think you fail to see the flaws within yourself.”

In which case you would be completely wrong. Which is why I don’t go around tooting my own horn about what a great Christian I am. RW has drawn attention to the fact that I’ve boasted of my professional abilities, but that’s more in response to the frustration of having to kowtow to Johnny-come-latelies during job interviews.

Like I said to RW, you have your supporters here on the blog, and I have mine. I’m comfortable with my relationship with the vast majority of bloggers here. As far as the “real world”, who knows what each of us is like, since it’s not uncommon for folks to step out of their real world personas when seated at the keyboard.

Normal

August 26th, 2010
1:23 pm

RW,
And you think the day Beck picked for his rally was just a coincidence?

We both know better…it’s not unity he’s promoting.

Kamchak

August 26th, 2010
1:24 pm

Too bad “progressives” would prefer to shout it down.

Not this “progressive.” This “progressive” recognizes that as a U.S.citizen, GB has every right to rally on U.S. soil. Provided of course that the rally is in compliance with all applicable laws.

Palin fan

August 26th, 2010
1:24 pm

Republicans who stand in principals will not and should not cooperate with the America destroying hoppie-and changie bills from the democrats.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:28 pm

Normal:

Who says we need unity? We will never get that ………. but we must turn this country around.

P.S. I remember studying the War Between the United (oxymoron) States of America and the Confederate States of America in high school and college. I liked it so much that reading about it became a hobby/passion as I grew older.

One thing I could never quite reconcile ……… how could things have gotten so bad that Americans would actually take up arms against each other. I would never advocate that, especially in modern times, but I now am gaining an understanding and appreciation of how that happend.

@@

August 26th, 2010
1:28 pm

Bruno:

Which is why I don’t go around tooting my own horn about what a great Christian I am.

NO? You just like telling other Christians where they fail to meet the standards set by you.

I’ve said numerous times that there’ll be no dust gathering on my sandals, but I admire Christians like Scout who will testify for their faith. I’ve never denigrated ANY religion, never having walked a mile in their sandals.

Left-wingers and YOU do it all the time.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
1:30 pm

Normal,

Of course it’s not a coincidence. Part of the message is to actually live Dr. Kings dream of a colorblind society. You obviously don’t subscribe. He’s also made a point of not delivering his remarks from a point as high up the steps as Dr. King.

You can read more about the rally here or you can continue to be led around by your left-wing webmobs

emo

August 26th, 2010
1:30 pm

I really am afraid of the Republicans taking over again; the next time they fly this airplane into the ground, it won’t arise again, and we will be a third-world nation forever.
While everyone says they’ll have to put forth proposals to actually run the country, it will just be more eternal tax breaks for the rich and blame the deficit on Obama.
Whatever happened to the entrepreneurial spirit in America? All I hear is that business is sitting on two trillion dollars in cash, and they are afraid to spend it because they aren’t guaranteed a good profit. It used to be that people would take a risk for a return, but no longer.
As for the Republicans and compromise, I seem to remember Boehner saying that they were going to vote no on everything, long before anything even came to the floor.

Matti

August 26th, 2010
1:31 pm

Bruno,

I’ve heard you boast of other things. heh….

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:31 pm

POLL: Voters Now Trust Republicans More On All 10 Key Issues…

Polls are controlled by a bunch of dangerous right wing extremists, right?

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:32 pm

Tea Party Group Hit With Death Threats…

Riiiiight, the tea partiers are the ones to be feared?

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:32 pm

Matti:

Look ………… there goes a mongrel puppy !

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
1:32 pm

“Bruno, What are you talking about? Ted Kennedy died a year ago and the Dems haven’t had a filibuster proof majority since then.”

C’mon, DF, you wouldn’t expect me to let facts get in the way of a good blog, would you?? If we’re going to be technical, though, Brown didn’t win Kennedy’s seat until January, so it’s only been 8 months since the balance of power shifted slightly back to the Repubs. Of course, once you throw RINO Olympia Snow into the mix, you’ve got your majority back.

BTW, I saw your alternative energy blog from last night this AM. I don’t have the technical expertise to comment on the relative cost-effectiveness of wind and solar power, but I think the slow rate at which they are being implemented isn’t purely politics as you seem to think.

Matti

August 26th, 2010
1:32 pm

Scout,

Dog is love!

Scout

August 26th, 2010
1:33 pm

The Leg Lamp is a “major award” much like Cynthia Tucker’s Pulitzer and Obama’s Nobel. :

You know the mainstream media is not going to pick any of that up. It’s not in their agenda.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:33 pm

emo

August 26th, 2010
1:30 pm

After reading your post I’d say you chose the perfect name.

Matti

August 26th, 2010
1:34 pm

Whatever happened to the entrepreneurial spirit in America?

Big business killed it.

Normal

August 26th, 2010
1:34 pm

Scout,
The problem I have is that he was spouting about the insensitivity of the Muslims wanting to build a “Mosque” at Ground Zero and yet he will use the day and site of one of the greatest speeches ever made by an even greater man, to spew his …hatred. Glen Beck is a sorry SOB

Kamchak

August 26th, 2010
1:34 pm

Daddy, why does that man try to lure young girls with puppies?

godless heathen

August 26th, 2010
1:34 pm

“August 28th is an important day in American history.”

I check all the calendars I have available. The anniversary date of Kings speech is not shown on there. I bet if you did a street survey of the significance of the date, 99 out of 100 would not know this bit of information.

Why didn’t the park service have the venue reserved if it was such a momentus time and place?

Sounds like some folks trying to find an excuse to whine about something. Much like the not a mosque that’s not at ground zero.

@@

August 26th, 2010
1:36 pm

Stop the roller-coaster, I wanna get off.

(Reuters) – U.S. stocks erased gains, turning little changed on Thursday as a modest improvement seen in a jobs data was not enough to keep markets up.

Weekly jobless claims declined more than expected last week, briefly sending stocks higher, but the four-week average of new claims, a measure regarded as better reflecting labor market trends, rose to a nine-month high, offsetting the enthusiasm.

Normal

August 26th, 2010
1:37 pm

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
1:30 pm

I’ll agree with that if you’ll agree that all that “insensitivity” talk about the Muslim Community is just that, talk.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
1:37 pm

Leg Lamp Bulb blown?

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
1:38 pm

Leg Lamp Unplugged?

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
1:39 pm

“You just like telling other Christians where they fail to meet the standards set by you.”

I didn’t write Ephesians 5:15-20, the Apostle Paul did.

“I’ve never denigrated ANY religion, never having walked a mile in their sandals.”

And I don’t denigrate religion either, unless you feel that pointing out that they are all based on mythology is a form of denigration. Now, as far as denigrating individuals who CLAIM to follow a certain faith when they really don’t, I am guilty as charged.

“I admire Christians like Scout who will testify for their faith.”

Not picking on Scout in particular, I focus on the walk, not the talk. And since we’re only talking here, we can only take it “on faith” how folks conduct themselves in the real world.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
1:39 pm

Leg Lamp Power outage?

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:40 pm

barking frog all bark, no bite?

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:40 pm

Granny Godzilla aka ctucker,

Remind me to never take a vacation with you.
I like to enjoy peace and quiet mixed in with a little par-tay on my vacations.

Shawny

August 26th, 2010
1:40 pm

I think you miss the boat a bit in understanding what is driving the resurgence. It isn’t simply “NO”, but rather, no expansion of the federal govt, its powers, its reach, and more importantly, its excessive spending. No to that, but not no to compromise.

You mention the Gingrich-Clinton standoff…. a static government, one that is predictable even if non-functional, is good for business and the economy. The Gringrich-Clinton years were very good.

Businesses today are hording cash. Why? Uncertainty. Uncertainty with how new tax legislation, healthcare costs, and so on are going to impact them. Business hates uncertainty. Dems in control with Obama at the helm is driving all this “Change”, and albeit a bit reckless, it scares the heck out of businesses and they are afraid to hire or expand.

Bring on another standoff. Keep the change.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:42 pm

Normal

How many women did MLK screw while married? 10, 20, 30 or more?

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
1:42 pm

“Bruno, I’ve heard you boast of other things. heh….”

I’ll have to leave it to your imagination whether those other boasts are true or not, Matti. No unhappy customers so far, though. Of course, you may be more of a demanding consumer than most…..

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:43 pm

I’m Here From The Government And I’m Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:42 pm

I don’t know, but I guess none wore blue dresses.

mm

August 26th, 2010
1:43 pm

Yes, the rightwing media has been peddling this BS for a year now that the republicans might take over the house and senate. Two reasons:

1. To give the badly beaten (last 2 election cycles) republican voters a reason to get out and vote in November.

2. To try to convince the democratic voters to stay home in November since they would have no chance of winning.

The polls are as misleading now as they were in 2008 before the election. They were wrong about Obama then. They are wrong about the dems now. Many young people in the US have a cell phone, but not a landline. Polls are taken on landlines, therefore missing a nice percentage of the young population, which tends to vote democratic.

Secondly, all the craziness coming from the right might fire up the GOP base, but it is scaring the heck out of a majority of Americans (the majority that elected Obama).

You wingnuts can dream on about the election, but having a majority ain’t gonna happen. The tea party will prevent that.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
1:43 pm

Leg Lamp No teeth, long tongue.

Rightwing Troll

August 26th, 2010
1:43 pm

Anybody would be hard pressed to make the hate baggers seem any more petty and mean.

We’ll see…

harvey

August 26th, 2010
1:45 pm

Don’t slam those “not for prime time” people. They are just honest people stepping up to the plate to try to rid Washington of the infestation of career politicos that are so entrenched they have forgotten that they are Americans first. I am hopeful that when conservatives take over there is still something left to salvage, and I am also hopeful that when that happens the American public will stay fired up, and hold their feet to the fire to ensure we don’t allow them to run away with any more of our children’s future than they already have.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
1:45 pm

Normal,

I’m sure some of the talk is just talk, but I highly doubt it all is.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:45 pm

How’s the ghetto changed under Obama?

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:45 pm

barking frog all talk, no balls.

BADA BING

August 26th, 2010
1:46 pm

Having trouble with the date that Beck chose? Do you have any trouble with a black bail bonds company that goes by the name of “Free At Last” bail bonds. It is in the phone book, look it up. Doesn’t that make it seem that jail is a ‘black’ thing, something that comes natural? Why aren’t black people outraged at that?

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:46 pm

mm

Polls are also taken during normal business hours. Who’s at home more the employed or unemployed?

joe

August 26th, 2010
1:48 pm

The GOP will take the house and elect reps who reject big govt, spending out the ying yang, and a quasi socialist position for our country. Homey don’t play dat. The only reason BO was elected was everyone wanted a change. Well boy did we ever get one…spending like we’ve never seen it, zero illegal immigration enforcement, bailouts for all who would rather sit on their behinds with their hands held out for the latest “gimme gimme nanny nanny.” We are tired of the direction our country in going and until the GOP is back in charge, unemployment will not improve because company’s are sitting on their profits and not hiring because business have no idea what BO will come up with next. You want jobs, vote GOP.

The Leg Lamp is a "major award" much like Cynthia Tucker's Pulitzer and Obama's Nobel.

August 26th, 2010
1:49 pm

WIRE: It’s starting to feel like another recession…
One in 10 mortgage holders face foreclosure…

barking frog sees this as good.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
1:49 pm

Not picking on Scout in particular, I focus on the walk, not the talk. And since we’re only talking here, we can only take it “on faith” how folks conduct themselves in the real world.

That’s BS, Bruno.

If that statement were true you’d have no way to keep calling @@ a bad Christian based strictly on talk. You’d also be right up there with the leftists chastising her for bragging about her “walk” if she did talk about it.

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
1:49 pm

Leg Lamp barking frog all talk, no balls needed.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
1:50 pm

Here we are some 45 years after the Civil Rights Act and what has changed in the black communities? Not much if you believe all the whining from the left. Wonder why? Even the Latino’s have progressed further than the blacks. Wonder why?

mike

August 26th, 2010
1:52 pm

LOL. Considering that Jay thought that Obama was “ready for prime time”.

Liberal pundits are all bleating this same desperate refrain They are stunningly uncreative. Jay’s column and EJ Dionne’s column to day are almost identical.

Don't forget

August 26th, 2010
1:52 pm

Bruno,
As soon as Ted Kennedy died, the dems only had 59 votes and lost the filibuster proof majority. Brown had nothing to do with it.
As for the alternative energy thing you kind of missed the point.

@@

August 26th, 2010
1:53 pm

Now, as far as denigrating individuals who CLAIM to follow a certain faith when they really don’t, I am guilty as charged.

And I’m not, but let’s look at your next statement:

I focus on the walk, not the talk. And since we’re only talking here, we can only take it “on faith” how folks conduct themselves in the real world.

On the one hand you seem to know “they really don’t”, and on the other, you say you have no way of knowing how they conduct themselves in the real world.

I know that you “know”, I’m a hypocrite.

Weird, dude!

barking frog

August 26th, 2010
1:54 pm

leg lamp 1:49 rental poperty gets rented, investor gets bargain property,
lawyers handle foreclosure, courts handle process, bank gets tax deduction,
what’s not good?

Jonathan

August 26th, 2010
1:54 pm

I stay under my bed all day for fear that the hate mongering tea partiers will hit me in the head with a skillet.

Seriously, not a tea partier myself (no time- having to work hard to keep ahead of taxes and bills) but can the left stop the garbage- makes you look moronic-

@@

August 26th, 2010
1:58 pm

Come to think of it, I’ve never talked about what I, as a Christian, do on a personal level. I do recall giving credit to my church congregation.

Any sacrifices I make as a teacher, have NOTHING to do with my faith. I was drawn to special-ed schoolmates as a child. I considered it a privilege to work with them as an adult. There’s a kinship that I can’t explain.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
2:03 pm

“If that statement were true you’d have no way to keep calling @@ a bad Christian based strictly on talk. You’d also be right up there with the leftists chastising her for bragging about her “walk” if she did talk about it.”

RW–I made a qualifying statement that none of us knows what the others here are like in the real world unless we’ve met outside the blog. Even then, it’s difficult to know what is in other’s hearts unless you spend a great deal of time with them.

Having said that, however, it is a fact that @@ demeans other bloggers here on a regular basis, everyone from myself, to Matti, to Granny Godzilla, to USinUK, to Bosch, even to Jay. Which I wouldn’t have a problem with except for the fact that she wants to wrap herself in holy robes at other times. I’m likely just as abrasive, just as sfd, AmVet and some others are, but those of us in that second group aren’t claiming to be representatives of Christ.

But, I’ll tell you what, I’ll slap my WWHDD bracelet on and let the subject drop. You and @@ are welcome to have the last word.

jm

August 26th, 2010
2:03 pm

Obviously the democrats have never done this. Ahem, sorry, Obama doesn’t count of course.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
2:04 pm

Normal – RW

“And you think the day Beck picked for his rally was just a coincidence?”

I had heard – but have been unable to verify – that it wasn’t so much Beck picking a day as the National Park Service saying ‘you can have this day.”

Anyone can confirm or refute?

Typical Tea Partying Republican

August 26th, 2010
2:08 pm

Nah-uh. All we have to do it stop Obama and we will be heroes, just like the U.S. troops were treated by the Iraqis.

scrappy

August 26th, 2010
2:10 pm

Scout –

I learned early on that it is easier to deal with Students than Parents, which is why I never became a teacher & which is how I answered your questions.

Yes, I am sure Al would whine and cause a fuss, just like he always does. And most of us will ignore both the KKK rally and the rantings of Al. If you say the same thing is happening, than the only real difference here is that we have all learned to ignore Al and the KKK, yet can’t seem to ignore the building of mosque or the ranting of those opposed to it, say like Beck.

So, there you have it, ignore it and it will go away. (or at least cease to matter)

Jimmy62

August 26th, 2010
2:12 pm

We’re just asking for people who will stick to limited government principles, as outlined in the Constitution. People who will look at the Interstate Commerce Clause, and it see as a limit on Congressional power, rather than twist the wording to make it so they can do anything they want. Why the heck would that clause even be in the Constitution if not to limit the power of government?

All we ask for is candidates that will follow the Constitution, the supreme law of the land. And, among other things, nowhere does it say that Congress can force Americans to buy health insurance. That’s only possible by going against the obvious intent of the framers, as well as the plain writing of the Constitution.

Democrats (and most incumbents) can’t say the same. They don’t care about the Constitution, as evidenced on their calls for things like The Fairness Doctrine, and willingness to pass laws that force Americans to buy products from private corporations, and their support for Congress to do anything they want threough the Interstate Commerce Clause.

Bruno

August 26th, 2010
2:12 pm

“As soon as Ted Kennedy died, the dems only had 59 votes and lost the filibuster proof majority. Brown had nothing to do with it.
As for the alternative energy thing you kind of missed the point.”

DF–We can pick up the debate later, gotta run. For now, your points stand.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:13 pm

Liberals are so funny. Calling Republicans “the party of no”…like saying no to massive deficit spending, to a government-run healthcare that a majority rejects, to reckless foreign policy, or to a massive increase of big-government socialism would be a bad thing…

Rightwing Troll

August 26th, 2010
2:13 pm

What, exactly, will “conservatives” do when they take over?

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:14 pm

Oh, almost forgot…

Kamchak…SQUIRREL!!!

Matti

August 26th, 2010
2:15 pm

I hate to jump into this line of discussion (again) because I don’t think talking about it makes any difference, but I have to agree w/Bruno on the hypocrite thing. I’ve been visiting the AJC blogs for years, and the meanest, nastiest personal attacks seem to come from those who claim a piece of the way, truth, and light. Y’all know who you are, and if you really DO act like Jesus and follow his example, then we’re not talking about you, and bless you for taking the higher ground!

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:15 pm

“like saying no to massive deficit spending”

But not when THEY do it

“to a government-run healthcare that a majority rejects”

That they were for, before they were against it

“to reckless foreign policy,”

But not when THEY do it

“or to a massive increase of big-government”

But not when THEY do it

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:17 pm

Doggone, nice try, but as alwqays, you make no coherent points, and your post is pretty much irrelevant.

chuck

August 26th, 2010
2:18 pm

Who you talking about, Matti??

(Just kidding you, hon)

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:19 pm

“and your post is pretty much irrelevant.”

Truth hurts, doesn’t it?

@@

August 26th, 2010
2:19 pm

Bruno:

I’ve had one encounter with Matti. She made the assumption that I was putting Michelle Obama down. She was wrong. I was simply curious as to what cause she had adopted as first-lady. She actually has two. I wish the media would focus a bit more on what she does with the families of our troops. I know ’cause I keep tabs.

I have every reason to be suspicious of Granny. She went after me with a vengeance and exacted that vengeance in a way which I found unacceptable.

Can’t recall any over-the-top encounters with USUK. Not saying there weren’t any, just saying they weren’t blatant enough to be memorable.

Bosch is no angel. He’s gone after me personally and I like to return the favor. He’s like a gnat…always buzzing around my posts. I’ve warned him to steer clear. He won’t listen. I’ll give as good as I get from him. I will say I find him extremely boring.

And jay???? The day he can’t hold his own will be the day left-wingers have to step up in his defense.

Puhleeeeze. Enough with your tales of “whoooaaaaa”.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
2:20 pm

RW–I made a qualifying statement…

Bruno,

Yes you did and most people would have realized there was no reason to finish or post the comment at that point. At least if the qualifier wasn’t just something to hide behind later.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:20 pm

AmVet, let me ask you a question…if Republicans are no different than Obama as you say (i.e. massive deficits, health care, foreign ploicy, bog-government) hen why do you hate Republicans and get a woody for Barack?

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:21 pm

My bad…insert “Doggone” for “AmVet”… (think they are one and the same anyway, much like Granny Godzilla nad CT)…

John

August 26th, 2010
2:22 pm

Quit crying, Bookman. The Dems have literally destroyed the country in just 4 years. Who in their right mind would keep those morons in power?

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:22 pm

“(think they are one and the same anyway”

You’ll need to re”think” that one

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
2:23 pm

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:23 pm

Oh come on Dogggone, are you really that befuddled? Why no response? You claim there’s no difference between Dems and Republicans, yet you have a pathological hatred for one and teenager-in-love hormones for the other? LOL…

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
2:23 pm

Paul,

There could be something to being able to get that date and it happening to be a Saturday, but Beck has talked a good bit about the significance of the date so if was a coincidence he’s quite happy with it.

The people who dismiss him as a racist obviously haven’t been watching his TV show for the last couple of months.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:24 pm

Hey Cynthia, errr Granny I mean…how high did the water get this morning down at Bankhead Court?

@@

August 26th, 2010
2:25 pm

Paul:

I had heard – but have been unable to verify – that it wasn’t so much Beck picking a day as the National Park Service saying ‘you can have this day.”

I recall hearing the same thing. I was researching it when I dropped back in to find Bruno’s invitation. I never turn down an invitation to party.

Back to enter the webber.

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:25 pm

“You claim there’s no difference between Dems and Republicans”

I’d like to see you quote me on that…especially since I’ve never said anything like that.

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
2:28 pm

Harry

It would have floated that one bullet right outa’ your pocket.

How’s Thelma Lou?

Scout

August 26th, 2010
2:29 pm

Normal and Scrappy:

Agree to strongly disagree on your points. Thanks for the exchange.

Matti

August 26th, 2010
2:30 pm

chuck,

But we’re buddies NOW, right? I mean, you forgave and LOVE and pray for me, right? I know you do! {hugs!}

Scout

August 26th, 2010
2:32 pm

Normal:

I believe Jesus focused on the “talking part”. He could have healed everyone, fed everyone, clothed everyone ………. but He didn’t. He did tell everyone He could about eternal life.

“Go into all the world and preach the Gospel to everyone ……………. ”

Someone who feeds the poor, clothes them, houses them, etc., etc. but fails to tell them of Jesus and His gift of eternal life has missed the boat.

Why? Because eternity is much longer than this life.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:34 pm

Doggone…your 2:15 implies that Republicans now oppose things they previously supported. Calling them the “party of no” implies that they are now opposed to whatever Obama wants to do.

If they are opposed to what Obama wants, and they now oppose what they previously supported, it logically follows that Obama now wants what the Republicans supported in the past. But, according to you libbies, Republicans destroyed America, while Barack is our savior. And according to you it’s all the same policies. Do you read much?

1)

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:36 pm

Granny…the 60’s TV trivia blog is over in the Comics section, rigth above CT’s blog.

chuck

August 26th, 2010
2:36 pm

“But we’re buddies NOW, right? I mean, you forgave and LOVE and pray for me, right? I know you do! {hugs!}’

LOl you silly miscreant.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
2:37 pm

Granny Godzilla aka ctucker
August 26th, 2010
2:23 pm

tee hee hee

Getting a quickie, then back to the beach!

Scout

August 26th, 2010
2:40 pm

Oxymorons I heard today:

Liberal patriot
Moderate Muslim
President Obama (think about it)

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
2:40 pm

Harry

I know that’s were I saw your photo.

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
2:41 pm

Phibbs Jenkins

August 26th, 2010
2:42 pm

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
2:43 pm

Paul

August 26th, 2010
2:45 pm

RW-(the original) @@

Thanks. That the Park Service said ‘you want a Saturday in this month? You can have this Saturday, none other’ would not surprise me a bit.

Rather like the Ritz Carlton saying to the bride-to-be “We understand you want to get married on Saturday, June 14th. That day is not available. The first open Saturday is at the end of July. Would you like that day?”

But oh, how quick Ms Tucker and others were to take it as a direct slap in the face of a ‘hijacking our day.”

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:46 pm

Serious question for Granny Godzilla, AmVet, Doggone/GA, Kamchak, Bookman, or any of the other lefties here…

You mock conservatives and tea party supporters as dumb, stupid, etc, and yet…according to the CBS/NYTimes survey, tea party supporters are wealthier and more educated on average than the general public. And conservatives/tea party people want nothing from government, while you lefties want your healthcare, retirement, your job security, price controls, etc, etc….

So I guess my question is…what color is the sky in your world, where the wealthy, the educated, and the self-reliant among us are considered stupid, while the poor, the uneducated, and the government-dependent folks are supposedly the enlightened and intellectual? LMAO…

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:46 pm

“But, according to you libbies, Republicans destroyed America, while Barack is our savior.”

The only people I’ve ever heard call Obama that are the conned. It’s not something I would ever say, or think. So are far as *I* am concerned, you got that one wrong.

And according to you it’s all the same policies.”

Nope, never said that. I said the R’s are only oppoosed to those things when THEY didn’t intiate them. Give them the power again, and they’ll be off and running with them…again.

And probably (just a guess) it’s the D’s who will suddenly “see the light” and be against them. Contrarianism is the name of the game these days.

@@

August 26th, 2010
2:46 pm

O.K., I’m done searching. The only thing I found was a statement by Beck, himself, and we know how well that’ll be received. Something a the original date being the 12th which fell on a Sunday. Anyhoo…

Bill Press: Glenn Beck’s 8/28 Rally ‘Like Granting Al Qaeda Permission To Hold 9/11 Rally at Ground Zero’

ran across ^^^ that and decided to hang it up.

HDB

August 26th, 2010
2:47 pm

John August 26th, 2010
2:22 pm
“Quit crying, Bookman. The Dems have literally destroyed the country in just 4 years. Who in their right mind would keep those morons in power?”

Au contraire, mon ami! Look at what the GOP did in their eight years..can you can’t pin all that’s happened on Obama. If you REALLY want to get specific about things: it took 43 white guys to screw up the country…and you expect one black man to fix this mess in less than 2 years!!??? In English class, that’s called the “theatre of the absurd”!!

Bruno August 26th, 2010
12:23 pm
“Hate, bigotry and fear… it’s what the “right” runs on to get out their “peeps” to the polls….”

“Saul–And the “left” is different how?? Open class warfare, dire predictions that civil rights will be taken away for minorities, and claims that Social Security will be taken away seem to be staples during election times for Democratic candidates.”

Bruno, if you look at the GOP platform…..what the Democrats rail against are exactly what the GOP advocates: privitization of Social Security (risk everything in the stock market); class warfare (tax breaks for the wealthy); non-regulation of markets (check the financial markets under the Bush Administration); elimination of rights (look at SB 1070….and the antithesis of black farmers under the Reagan Administration)…..

The question I ask many conservatives to see if they really KNOW the truth: Have you ever been black and unemployed in a Republican Administration??

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
2:49 pm

Phibbs Jenkins
August 26th, 2010
2:42 pm

More embarrassement the Obama regime:

Thanks for the info. Another nail in the impeachment column!

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
2:50 pm

Paul,

I think you may have misread what I was saying. Beck has definitely embraced the date even it was just happenstance. I have a sister that was born on 8/28 a few years before the MLK speech. Where do I go to complain that he hijacked her special day?

chuck

August 26th, 2010
2:50 pm

In case you forgot, Matti, I did write a song in your honor, “Raising Hell in Jacksonville”. You didn’t like it much, but the boys from Shinedown did:

Leathered skin and shoeless feet
Crazy kids out on the street
Smokin’ dope and drinkin’ brew
Always searching for something new
.
Beach meets bum and waves meet sand
Yet one more Skynyrd cover band
Playing loud along the coast
Helps us see what matters most
.
Stealin’ cars and breakin’ hearts
You know we always did our part
To raise some hell, raise some hell
Raisin’ hell in Jacksonville
.

I

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
2:50 pm

Harry Callahan
August 26th, 2010
2:46 pm

DITTO! Best Post of the Day!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:50 pm

HDB…rather than point out the three dozen factual problems in your rant, let’s just start with one…

Who said privatization of social security means that the money has to go into the stock market? Stocks are only one of many, many tyes of private investment instruments. Are you aware that teacher’s unions and government employee unions have their pension funds invested in provate securities, often stocks? Thanks in advance.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
2:50 pm

@@

“The only thing I found was a statement by Beck, himself, and we know how well that’ll be received. ”

So if Beck had said “You’re darn right I picked that date!!!” they’d say ‘oh, Glennie, we don’t believe you. Someone picked it for you, didn’t they?”

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
2:51 pm

Harry you big silly, it’s blue! Seriously it is blue.

Kamchak

August 26th, 2010
2:52 pm

Serious question for Granny Godzilla, AmVet, Doggone/GA, Kamchak, Bookman, or any of the other lefties here…

You mock conservatives and tea party supporters as dumb, stupid, etc…

Serious question for you, sport—Can you show me where I have done exactly as you have claimed?

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:53 pm

Isn’t there a disconnect here?

“Who said privatization of social security means that the money has to go into the stock market”

” have their pension funds invested in provate securities, often stocks? ”

How do you invest in “stocks” withOUT being “in” the stock market?

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:54 pm

“Serious question for you, sport—Can you show me where I have done exactly as you have claimed?”

Or me?

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:54 pm

Kamchak..I’ll answer that when you answre the questions I ask you and you continually dodge…

1) Are you opposed to socialism?
2) Do you think the top tax rate should be higher or lower than 39.6%?

Thanks in advance.

Disgusted

August 26th, 2010
2:55 pm

What, exactly, will “conservatives” do when they take over?

I’m certainly no prophet, but anyone who follows the political news can predict what will happen next year, whether Republicans actually take control of one of the houses of Congress or merely gain enough seats to block any Democratic initiatives:

1. There will be no funding for the healthcare law. The law may stay on the books, but there will be no funds to implement it. If Boehner & Co. find it necessary to shut down the government to implement the blockage, they will do so. In any case, there won’t be sufficient votes in either the House or the Senate to pass a budget containing such funding.

2. Although Social Security is fully funded for many years and could be funded for many decades to come with some minor tweaks, the Republicans will go after the program with a vengeance. This is a stealth initiative. They will be assisted in their efforts by Alan Simpson and other SS-hating members of the presidential commission. Word has gone out from on high that candidates aren’t to mention privatization and other measures, so as to minimize the votes lost from seniors and those nearing retirement. That’s why even Angle and other members of the Orange Pekoe movement are now soft-pedaling the issue and even backtracking. But after the November elections, you will begin seeing a full frontal assault.

3. There will be an aggressive movement to extend the full program of the Bush tax cuts, including those for the most wealthy. Republicans will continue the faux argument that tax cuts have no impact on the deficit.

4. The emphasis of the increased Republican presence in Congress will be on cutting back “entitlement programs”—Medicaid and other programs to help lower-income people. This will include scaling back or eliminating the Advanced Income Credit. Even though such programs account for less than 10% of the budget deficit, the argument will be that “we gotta start somewhere.”

Those who think that a Republican-controlled Congress and a Democratic controlled White House will yield the best possible outcome need to put down the crack pipe. You haven’t seen gridlock until you witness the shenigans beginning in January 2011.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:56 pm

Doggone…again…read much? I’m asking HDB that, if the left views the stock market with such disdain, why do their biggest supporters (unions) embrace it?

HDB

August 26th, 2010
2:56 pm

Harry Callahan August 26th, 2010
2:46 pm
“You mock conservatives and tea party supporters as dumb, stupid, etc, and yet…according to the CBS/NYTimes survey, tea party supporters are wealthier and more educated on average than the general public. And conservatives/tea party people want nothing from government, while you lefties want your healthcare, retirement, your job security, price controls, etc, etc….

So I guess my question is…what color is the sky in your world, where the wealthy, the educated, and the self-reliant among us are considered stupid, while the poor, the uneducated, and the government-dependent folks are supposedly the enlightened and intellectual? LMAO…”

First, may I counter your argument. I am college educated, self reliant, and not dependent upon the government EXCEPT for my rights as an American citizen to be maintained and protected!! The problem is that many conservatives only see the “lighter” side of the scale to think that only one side is American…and other other side isn’t!!

Second: I have YET to meet someone that says that te safety net should NOT exist! As a progressive, I DO admit that there are abuses in the system that needs to be addressed…..but would you rather live in a draconian society…or one based on principles of caring for the least…..

Third: From the interfaces I’ve had with the Tea Party, they only see one color scheme — WHITE!! The nation is in transition…..and those who are of a darker shade are progressing into positions of power!!

Fourth: Whatever happened to the MODERATE Republicans from the Northeast and Midwest….like Weicker, Rockefeller…..?? The conservatives with their anti-minority paradigm (since 1964) have taken over!! Note where the strongest voting bloc is for the GOP? The “Confederate South”!!

As I’ve stated before…if the GOP would remember its HISTORY…in that minorities FOUNDED the party….care about the PEOPLE…rather than just those of wealth……then embrace the fiscal discipline that you CLAIM to have (not when you look at Reagan and the Bushes!)…..THEN maybe many more could embrace your policies! AS it now stands…..can’t do it!!

Keith

August 26th, 2010
2:57 pm

Jay, you don’t get it. A large segment of the population wants unpolished rough around the edges everyday passionate candidates. We’re tired of the professional sound-bite crowd

Paul

August 26th, 2010
2:57 pm

RW-(the original)

Thanks. Makes sense to me. Someone with a “what happened this day in history” calendar reads it and… viola! Nice tie-in.

Tell your sis to take it out on your mom. And if she was born before that date, tell your mom she should have known anyhow!

Oh, re: the Ms. Tucker comment: Pres Obama opined about freedom regarding the mosque, Ms Tucker headlines her thread ‘ Obama supports mosque near Ground Zero” then a day later the Pres said “I never said that.”

TaxPayer

August 26th, 2010
2:57 pm

I disagree wholeheartedly with your assertion, Jay, that the Republicans have to make themselves look petty and extreme. Au Contraire. It is as though they were born with the attributes. More like a birthmark or birthright or one of them things like cattle are marked with.

mm

August 26th, 2010
2:57 pm

“Polls are also taken during normal business hours. Who’s at home more the employed or unemployed?”

I doubt the unemployed can afford a phone. It’s the rich folks who don’t have to work. Or the old folks that have been scared into stupidity.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:58 pm

Disgusted…Social Security fully funded for years to come? Really? Who told you that, Michael Moore? Or was it Keith Olberman…

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
2:59 pm

“why do their biggest supporters (unions) embrace it?”

That one’s easy: because they don’t have much choice. Insurance companies are not going, or least haven’t yet, embraced the idea of an insurance system like SS. Personally, I think they’ve missed a BIG trick on that one…but it’s their call, not mine.

HDB

August 26th, 2010
2:59 pm

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
2:56 pm
Doggone…again…read much? I’m asking HDB that, if the left views the stock market with such disdain, why do their biggest supporters (unions) embrace it?

Since pensions are no longer available, to plan for the aspects of retirement, many look to 401Ks…which are stock market-based!! But….look at what happened when the Bushes got in….note the massive losses in 401Ks when stocks went below 10000…….

Banks aren’t paying any interest on savings…..

What options are there??

Paul

August 26th, 2010
3:00 pm

Kamchak

“Serious question for you, sport—Can you show me where I have done exactly as you have claimed?”

And the answer to that is contained in one of our catch-all clips, the last words in the segment!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8lT1o0sDwI

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
3:00 pm

” then a day later the Pres said “I never said that.”

Paul,

Lot’s of leftists let their jerking knees get the best of them on that one. WSJ’s Best of the Web had a great deal of fun tracking the changes of at least one of them.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:02 pm

HDB…nice rant, but you didn”t answer my question. Nor did you acknowledge that, under the Bush proposal, privatization of Social Security ws to be VOLUNTARY, so if you didn’t want to invest in the stock market, or any other private instrument, you didn’t have to. As for the Tea Party being all white, that’s not true, but even if it was, participation is voluntary. If blacks want to spend another three generations supporting the party that denies them school choice, and dooms them to ghetto living and 3rd world schools, that’s a black problem, there’s really nothing I or the Tea Party or anyone else can address.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:03 pm

HDB…just FYI, 401(k) plans are not “stock market based.” You can have your 401(k) entirely in bonds, money market, whatever you wish. You are so completely over your head here, I really suggest you bow out. You’re making yourself look dumber and dumber.

popeye

August 26th, 2010
3:06 pm

Harry… “Disgusted…Social Security fully funded for years to come? Really? Who told you that, Michael Moore? Or was it Keith Olberman…

Really, Harry would you except the word of the trustees…who estimate until 2037?

http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/12/news/economy/SocSec_Medicare_trustees_report/index.htm

Swede Atlanta

August 26th, 2010
3:07 pm

The only proposals I have heard from the GOP regarding the economy are to leave the Bush taxcuts remain (no need to have them paid for) and cut taxes even more.

Let’s see how that works out if they take the House. Given that the DoD, Social Security and Medicare constitute the bulk of the budget, where will they start making cuts. You cannot balance the budget if you don’t significantly reduce these three line items especially if you are going to maintain the current taxcuts and/or make even more taxcuts.

The conventional wisdom is the housing market is about to completely implode. I wonder what great ideas we will see out of the House then.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:09 pm

popeye…where is all thaat money sitting right now? Thanks in advance…

Hootinanny Yum Yum

August 26th, 2010
3:10 pm

From CT, “Beverly Hall Needs to Retire”

I agree with Cynthia. I was set to read her entire blog, but she lost me with her second sentance.

“For more than a decade, Beverly Hall, superintendent of Atlanta Public Schools, proved brilliant at protecting her reputation. When she arrived in July 1999, she set about cultivating a coterie of mostly white business executives to serve as advisers and stalwart defenders.”

Why and how is it possible for her to bring race into almost every topic? I’d have posted this on her blog, but it’s closed to comments.

Doggone/GA

August 26th, 2010
3:10 pm

Swede Atlanta – strictly speaking, SS is not part of the budget. It has it’s own funding stream and has been noted already, is funded well into the future. The only reason the budget impacts it at all is because the SS money has been borrowed to pay for unfunded, or insufficiently funded, budget items and covered with government IOUs (bonds, I think…but I’m not sure about that)

Dan J

August 26th, 2010
3:10 pm

Peadawg its only been 2 years not 4 so its clear you have no clue go back to bed

HDB

August 26th, 2010
3:11 pm

Harry Callahan August 26th, 2010
3:02 pm

The GOP PLATFORM in 2000, 2004…and 2008 stated that the party supported privitization!! If you’ve noted, the GOP had over 20 years to address the SS problems…and have YET to do so!!

” As for the Tea Party being all white, that’s not true, but even if it was, participation is voluntary.” I never said it was ALL white…but the PREPONDERANCE of the Tea Party is…..and they fail to acknowledge that there IS a racist element involved!! Note the level of vitriol did not exist as it does now when Bush was in charge….in fact, the Tea Party did NOT exist!!

“If blacks want to spend another three generations supporting the party that denies them school choice, and dooms them to ghetto living and 3rd world schools, that’s a black problem…”

There’s another focus on this also: if the government wishes to deny access to education and employment by not enforcing existing laws; if the government does not allocate resources to fund educaton and stymies the possibilities of mobility; if the government allows discriminatory practices to progress unchecked, as was done by the AgDept under Reagan and Bushes….it’s MORE than a black problem…..it’s a NATIONAL problem!!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:11 pm

Kamchak…HELLO??? Need an answer to my two questions @ 2:54 please…

Scout

August 26th, 2010
3:11 pm

Phibbs Jenkins :

I read the article you posted. That’s treasonous if you ask me !

TaxPayer

August 26th, 2010
3:12 pm

I think the Republican “plan” is to leave the payroll tax in place and use it to make the Bush/Republican tax cuts permanent instead of using the money to pay social security benefits to those that have paid in their entire lives. Sounds like a plan to me.

Scout

August 26th, 2010
3:12 pm

Harry Callahan :

Hint. Kamchack doesn’t answer questions. Kamchack pontificates.

popeye

August 26th, 2010
3:14 pm

Harry, I beg to differ with you once again.

You say “HDB…just FYI, 401(k) plans are not “stock market based.” You can have your 401(k) entirely in bonds, money market, whatever you wish. You are so completely over your head here, I really suggest you bow out. You’re making yourself look dumber and dumber.

Not true…..It depends who your company offers! In my instance to receive equal matching funds in our 401 we had to either invest in our company (fortune 100) or a mutual fund controlled by our company … Which is the stock market.

Parlay it any way you want but some companies do not have CD’s, Bond’s etal……

reservoirDAWG

August 26th, 2010
3:14 pm

“not quite ready for primetime”, look who you idiots put in the White House.

HDB

August 26th, 2010
3:14 pm

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:03 pm
“HDB…just FYI, 401(k) plans are not “stock market based.” You can have your 401(k) entirely in bonds, money market, whatever you wish. You are so completely over your head here, I really suggest you bow out. You’re making yourself look dumber and dumber.”

Harry…certain money markets accounts are based in the stock market….401k’s also are…I have to check mine to see how the investments are……there are flexibilities…..but note what happened when the market tanked and the VALUE of 401Ks collapsed…….

Don’t fall for the okey-doke……

Hootinanny Yum Yum

August 26th, 2010
3:15 pm

The original Not Ready for Prime Time Players from “Saturday Night Live” were fairly successful…

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:16 pm

HDB…the Dems blocked Bush’s social security fix. Nor did they offer an alternative solution. They were just “the party of no.” Sound familiar?

Is the tea party predominantly white? Wow…blacks make up about 12% of the U.S. population…would be hard for the tea party to NOT be predominantly white, don’t you think?

Lastly, why don’t you tell us what CLinton or Obama has done for education that Bush(s) or Reagan didn’t do, and tell us how education has been better under Dem rule than under Republican. As always, thanks in advance.

Oh…and look up “No Child Left Behind” and learn about the deal that Bush 2 brokered with Ted Kennedy, and totally went with (and signed into law) the Kennedy Dem plan.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
3:17 pm

It’s really simple folks.

Do you want a Government the supports job creators?
or
Do you want a Government that supports job takers?

popeye

August 26th, 2010
3:17 pm

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:09 pm
popeye… “where is all thaat money sitting right now? Thanks in advance…”

Why don’t you tell me ohhhhhhh wise one?

You’re the one who made the comment. I backed up my comment with facts!

SPC

August 26th, 2010
3:17 pm

It would be fine with me if they (Republicans and Democrats) got nothing done. They’ve done enough already.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:18 pm

popeye…all of the social security money is gone…spent by the federal government. The only money to pay current retirees comes from the current revenue paid in by current workers. We have already reached the point where revenue is less than payout each year. How do you figure that equals “fully funded through 2073″? Thanks in advance.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:19 pm

popeye…I’ll tell you where it’s sitting…it’s not sitting anywhere. It’s GONE. You’re welcome.

Disgusted

August 26th, 2010
3:19 pm

Harry: Disgusted…Social Security fully funded for years to come? Really? Who told you that, Michael Moore? Or was it Keith Olberman…

Here it is in black and white, Harry. Or are you one of those who, having spent trust funds on other things, now want to nullify the loan you made?

The ACA makes significant progress toward making Medicare financially viable. But while it is projected that the Medicare HI Trust Fund is adequately financed until 2029, and the Social Security OASI and DI Trust Funds are adequately financed until 2040 and 2018, respectively, the significant longer term financial imbalances of the programs still need to be addressed. Trustees Report, 2010.

RW-(the original)

August 26th, 2010
3:19 pm

A 3-1-2 double play. You don’t see that one every day

See y’all this evening

@@

August 26th, 2010
3:20 pm

Paul:

they’d say ‘oh, Glennie, we don’t believe you. Someone picked it for you, didn’t they?”

Nothing jay’s left-wingers say or do would surprise me anymore.

Would you be surprised to know that I really don’t really give a *#%@^&*???

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:21 pm

popeye @ 3:14…yes, employers can specify that matching funds be invested however they stipulate, but it is NOT lawful for them to tell you where to put YOUR contributions. And if you think 401(k) is a ripoff, you can go with IRA’s.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:22 pm

Disgusted…there’s no money…they spent it years ago. All they have is an IOU, and on that basis, they claim it’s financially sound and solvent through whenever. Choosing to fall for that one, are you? LMAO.

@@

August 26th, 2010
3:23 pm

omit one “really”.

IHB

I Report :-) You Whine :-( mmm, mmmm, mmmmm! Just sayin...

August 26th, 2010
3:23 pm

And to think, last year we didn’t have a big enough tent, just remeberin…

Voters now trust Republicans more than dummycrats on all 10 of the important issues regularly tracked by Rasmussen Reports.

Enuff said…

Kyle

August 26th, 2010
3:23 pm

Enter your comments here

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:24 pm

Disgusted and Popeye, if I lend my life’s savings to my drunken brother-in-law, and he blows it all at a strip club and gives me an IOU, can I safely say my retirement is “fully funded”? LOL…

Kerry

August 26th, 2010
3:24 pm

DEM JOKES THAT PELOSI COULD DIE BEFORE NEXT YEAR

POLITICO: DEMS THINK HOUSE GONE…
BIDEN READY FOR MORE SPENDING: ‘This is a chance to do something big, man!’…
WIRE: It’s starting to feel like another recession…
One in 10 mortgage holders face foreclosure…
Obama Heads Out for Golf Round #48…

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:25 pm

Kamchak? HELLO??? Were those questions really all that tough?

popeye

August 26th, 2010
3:25 pm

Harry I understand that…I said matching funds. One puts in 100.00 the company puts in 100.00 (you do the math) or one can take their 100.00 and invest in in an IRA. What sounds more lucrative to you?

HDB

August 26th, 2010
3:26 pm

Harry Callahan August 26th, 2010
3:16 pm

“Why don’t you tell us what CLinton or Obama has done for education that Bush(s) or Reagan didn’t do, and tell us how education has been better under Dem rule than under Republican.”

OK…First thing Reagan did was CUT education spending…and changed the paradigm of educational funding (particularly higher education) from GRANTS to LOANS, thereby increasing the debt-to-income ratio. Clinton restored the funding…but maintained the paradigm! That’s why so many people are catching it with school loans and the default rate!! NCLB, although passed by Bush…is an UNFUNDED MANDATE!! Plus – changes to the GI Bill were enacted under Reagan to force veterans to both pay for their education with personal funds…and placed a time limit on usage…whereas prior to this…vets could access both education and health care easily!!

The earlier Republican SS fixes entailed cutting of benefits and raising the retirement age to 67….and we all know the SS Trust Fund was incorporated into the national budget to lessen the impact of the deficit!! Reagan was the first Administration to go this way!!

To give you this on a PERSONAL level: when I wanted to go back to school…couldn’t use my GI Bill…because the time limit ran out….couldn’t get funding under Bush….but was able to complete both Bachelors and Masters degrees under Clinton!! When I was looking for employment, I was told by employers that since Reagan was in the White House, they didn’t have to hire any minorities……(this was in Atlanta, also!) Longest periods of unemployment – Republican Administrations (2 YEARS)….Democrats (90 DAYS)! Vast difference, isn’t it???

Paul

August 26th, 2010
3:27 pm

Time for some happy news!

“One mile kill shot.”

3 with 1. Neat.

http://shock.military.com/Shock/videos.do?displayContent=219051&ESRC=airforce-a.nl

Chilean Miner

August 26th, 2010
3:27 pm

Como estas, Harry Callahan.

HDB

August 26th, 2010
3:30 pm

I’m Here From The Government And I’m Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
3:17 pm
It’s really simple folks.

Do you want a Government the supports job creators?
or
Do you want a Government that supports job takers?

We all want the government to support job creators, but when those creators TAKE JOBS OVERSEAS, then they need to be addressed. If taxes INCREASE on those companies who persist on taking jobs overseas….but taxes are reduced on those who invest in the US….then the creators would be more induced to erinvest in America. The problem is that under Republicans, the tax policy maximized profit at the EXPENSE of American workers!!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:36 pm

Kamchak…come on SPORT…two simple questions…should be a breeze for a bright guy like you.

Intown

August 26th, 2010
3:36 pm

” the GOP is looking like a dog that’s about to catch the car, with no idea whatsoever about what it ought to do next.”

I agree 100%. I also agreed with this sentiment when the Republicans took office at the State level in 2002. They still haven’t quite figured it out.

Abrazos

August 26th, 2010
3:36 pm

The “no” strategy seems to have had its intended effect and may work in the short-term. The Republican fired-up base of older white, rural/suburban, Southern Evangelicals may even put them back in this year. But as Karl Rove said, “there’s math and then there’s my math.”

So let’s do the math…you can’t win future elections when your base is already shrinking, yet they’ve done their best to permanently turn away or outright offend any demographic that they will need to help them win in the future (Hispanic voters,etc. The math is not in their favor past 2010 even if they pull this one out. And if they do pull it out, the voters have a rare opportunity to see almost all the same Republican leadership players in Congress reminding them (the voters) of why they kicked them out of majority status in 2006.

At best a Pyrrhic victory … a victory that is offset by staggering losses.

Disgusted

August 26th, 2010
3:36 pm

Disgusted…there’s no money…they spent it years ago. All they have is an IOU, and on that basis, they claim it’s financially sound and solvent through whenever. Choosing to fall for that one, are you? LMAO.

So because a craven, dissolute Congress borrows the money and blows it, Congress is justified in shafting SS participants as a way of addressing the problem?

@@

August 26th, 2010
3:37 pm

For those who may be interested, Kyle Wingfield will be moderating a face-to-face debate between Deal, Barnes, and Monds. He’s taking suggestions as they relate to questions at his site.

Kamchak

August 26th, 2010
3:37 pm

Hint. Kamchack doesn’t answer questions. Kamchack pontificates.

Hint: Kamchak went to the grocery store, and then a fresh produce market.

landry

August 26th, 2010
3:38 pm

Former Bush campaign director Ken Mehlman comes out as gay. How many more, GOP? If you can’t discriminate against yourself properly, you don’t belong in the GOP.

Paulo977

August 26th, 2010
3:39 pm

Keith@2:57pm “unpolished rough around the edges passionate candidates “!!!! Why did you omit “uneducated , and unlightened bigots”?????

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
3:39 pm

INTC Hit a New 52 Week Low at $18.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
3:39 pm

CSCO Hit a New 52 Week Low at $20.80

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:42 pm

Blog God! Damn!

“And conservatives/tea party people want nothing from government”

OK, I’m calling bullshyt on that. You take Medicare and SS away from retirees and you’d have a damn revolt on your hand — complete with pitchforks and molotov c o c k tails.

You want nothing from the government? Fine. Educate your own kids, don’t drive on any roads, put out any fires at your own damn house, and if someone breaks in, don’t bother calling the cops, and if someone needs medical assistance — I suggest you fly down to (because you can’t drive on those government maintained roads now) the nearest hospital, strap a doctor to your back and fly them back to your house — because you sure as hell can’t take your loved one to the hospital because they all are subsidized somehow by, you guessed it, the big bad government.

So good luck.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:45 pm

Harry,

And “wealthy and educated” folks can still be dumb as crap. The tea partiers are hypocrites — plain and simple. They only gripe and bitch about the government spending they don’t particularly like giving absolutely no consideration to anyone but themselves.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
3:46 pm

Harry

Not sure what the point is – fairness, proportionality, whatever – but for married couples the rate begins at 10% of the amount (after deductions) over $17000 and 35 percent of the amount over $374,000. It’ll go up a few points if the cuts aren’t extended.

Anyhow, that’s a spread of $350,000. Or, from the low end of 17k it’s about 22 times that amount to get to 374k.

That strikes me as a pretty tight range, especially given we have people making several million, several tens of millions, several hundreds of billions, and in the cases of some hedge funds, several billion dollars a year.

Do you think it right for a household to pay the same marginal tax rate as a household making 200 times less?

Maybe we should greatly reduce the rates we now have, then establish new brackets for people making over a million, 10 million, 100 million, or a billion a year?

Or do you think we should keep it the way it is, but reduce the rates for everybody while still maintaining the same rate for multimillion dollar earners as for a few hundred thousand dollar earners?

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:49 pm

@@,

From a previous post, it might do you some good to realize that if you want me to ignore you, you might want to not start a conversation with me.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
3:49 pm

What Bosch said at 3:42!!!!

Yeah!!!!

Mick

August 26th, 2010
3:50 pm

Harry

Remember the 50’s? Leave it to beaver and all that? The tax rates were much, much higher and our society had a strong, vibrant middle class. Fast forward to now and the very wealthy moan and groan because their taxes will go up 3%, thats three percent! Sure didn’t affect them in the 90’s, did it?

Paul

August 26th, 2010
3:50 pm

Bosch

I checked the calendar. It’s not conservative day. It’s not liberal day. It’s not dingbat liberal day or libertarian day. It’s anarchist’s day!

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:51 pm

Paul,

Are you mocking me? :-)

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:51 pm

“It’s anarchist’s day!”

SWEET! Me love me some anarchy.

Side note: have you ever had a wart burned off your finger? Damn. That hurts!

landry

August 26th, 2010
3:52 pm

We’d like our freedoms mutual, put the “tit” in constitutional-time for sexual equality-I should be allowed to let my puppies feel the ocean breeze….

Gator Joe

August 26th, 2010
3:53 pm

For Conservatives, Republicans, and the Right Wing who are prematurely celebrating their dream and, our nightmare, of a Republican take over of the House or Senate coming true, consider the following. Do you really believe Democrats will just sit by idylly while they [Republicans] once again attempt to destroy our country? What makes you think Democrats will cooperate with your representatives and senators after their behavior during these difficult times for our country? Democrats can be also be obstructionist, just watch.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:53 pm

Bosch…

“OK, I’m calling bullshyt on that. You take Medicare and SS away from retirees and you’d have a damn revolt on your hand — complete with pitchforks and molotov c o c k tails.”

They paid in all their life, in most cases against their will. So they shouldn’t get anything back? Right…

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:54 pm

Harry,

Do you honestly think for one frakkin’ second that they pay as much as they get out?

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:54 pm

Mick…

“Remember the 50’s? Leave it to beaver and all that? The tax rates were much, much higher and our society had a strong, vibrant middle class. Fast forward to now and the very wealthy moan and groan because their taxes will go up 3%, thats three percent! Sure didn’t affect them in the 90’s, did it?”

The top rates only applied to the extreme top tiny percentage of taxpayers. Google “bracket ccreep” and get back to us.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
3:56 pm

Actually, my mom sure as hell paid for more SS and Medicare than she got out — retired for one year then dies of a heat stroke six weeks ago watering her herb garden…..yeah, she paid for all those wingnuts who live to be 100 bitching about how the government is screwing them.

Great.

Hillbilly Deluxe

August 26th, 2010
3:56 pm

I just got here and am sort of browsing through the columns and posts. Damn, I hope we aren’t about to be subjected to a string of columns on Ann Coulter. :lol:

Paul

August 26th, 2010
3:58 pm

Bosch

Mocking you? Not at all.

Now, if I’d written “whenever I read “Bosch” I think “Bolshevik” that’d be mocking.

I really, really liked that 3:42

Yes, I have. Frozen off. Not so bad. Your doc must be a pervert!

Harry

“They paid in all their life, in most cases against their will. So they shouldn’t get anything back? Right…”

I believe the way the system is set up, by working and contributing they qualify to receive benefits when they retire. Their contributions go to support current retirees.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
3:58 pm

Bosch…

“You want nothing from the government? Fine. Educate your own kids, don’t drive on any roads, put out any fires at your own damn house, and if someone breaks in, don’t bother calling the cops, and if someone needs medical assistance — I suggest you fly down to (because you can’t drive on those government maintained roads now) the nearest hospital, strap a doctor to your back and fly them back to your house — because you sure as hell can’t take your loved one to the hospital because they all are subsidized somehow by, you guessed it, the big bad government.”

Nince rant…but total nonsense. Why don’t you tell us what percentage of the federal budget goes to roads,schools, police, firefighting, etc” Less than 1%. That stuff is all paid for by state and local. Nice try libbie, but no dice.

JohnnyReb

August 26th, 2010
3:59 pm

Those that think companies took jobs overseas because they “just wanted to” need to rethink. Jobs went overseas because Unions and/or Government regulations made manufacturing in the USA either impossible or unprofitable. There is talk of some type value added tax where, for example, a widget made in China would be taxed at import to put its price on par with the USA manufactured widget. That would drive up consumer pricing. In effect, the consumer would be paying to sustain lifestyles of Union employees and perpetuation of unnecessary or burdensome regulations.

@@

August 26th, 2010
3:59 pm

Bosch:

Don’t respond to the subject matter within posts with my name omitted. Sneaky is as sneaky does.

If you wanna engage then do so directly. I would, however, advise you against it.

Honestly, you and I have nothing in common, so what’s the point?

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:00 pm

Bosch…when your mom started working the SSI tax rate was about 1%, and you only paid on like the first $5,000 you earned each year. Current retirees on average get out everything they paid in, with interest, in the first 4 years. Look it up.

JohnnyReb

August 26th, 2010
4:02 pm

Here’s a big flaw in Social Security, you can check it out next time you get your SS statement. That is, someone who retires on a disability gets more money each month than someone who works until the full retirement age. That promotes fraud and is just wrong.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:02 pm

Harry,

No, it’s not total nonsense — you said that conservatives want nothing from the government — so good luck without that assistance. And oh yeah — good luck with that whole indoor plumbing/toilet thing — because without the government, you can’t flush your toilet.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:04 pm

Bosch @ 3:45…

“And “wealthy and educated” folks can still be dumb as crap. The tea partiers are hypocrites — plain and simple. They only gripe and bitch about the government spending they don’t particularly like giving absolutely no consideration to anyone but themselves.”

Let me ask you something sport…which is more selfish…

1) Wanting to keep your own money, and spending it yourwself, or;
2) Wanting to help yourself to OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY to spend on yourself

Do the people wanting to raise taxes on families making over $250K give a crap about ME? I’m thinking not…

As always, thanks in advance.

landry

August 26th, 2010
4:04 pm

Blacks with a shorter life expectancy then whites certainly get short-changed by medicare and social security, I await your racist retorts…

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:04 pm

Harry,

And no pharmaceuticals for you — paid for by federal money in research and development, and no food inspections, and you’ll need to pay the military for protecting your ass against terrorists.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
4:04 pm

Harry

Do us all a favor and don’t pay into social security and medicare, If by chance, you make it to old age and the market crashes or you get sued and lose your fortune, there will be nothing for you. Don’t think it can’t happen – I’ve seen it up close and personal..

Curious Observer

August 26th, 2010
4:04 pm

Fast forward to now and the very wealthy moan and groan because their taxes will go up 3%, thats three percent! Sure didn’t affect them in the 90’s, did it?

But . . . but . . . but that was all before we decided we hate government so much and it needs to be starved till it’s small enough to drown in a bathtub and . . .

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:05 pm

Bosch, once again, we’re talking federal governnment here…Jay started the blog about who would control the House of Representatives. I didn’t know that the feds did the sewer. Oh wait, I know mayor Shirley asked them for money to fix the crappers in Atlanta, but out in Cobb where I live, we pay our own way.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:07 pm

Mick, I live totally debt free and have substantial holdings, but thanks for your concern. It’s all good, I can imagine how it must be for people like you who cannot provide for themselves. I was the same way up until about age 15.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:08 pm

Reb @ 3:59 —

When did our country start caring more about those who run corporations who are responsible for shifting the wealth of our citizens to the upper 10% instead of being more concerned for the other 90%?

There is nothing quite like the fight for your right to get poorer and poorer.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:09 pm

Bosch,

1) I have insurance to pay for prescription drugs
2) If the terrorists come to my house, i have a .45 caliber surprise on the nightstand for them
3) I thought you libbies were opposed to the war on terror, Patriot act, etc?

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:09 pm

Harry,

You said GOVERNMENT — you didn’t specify. You don’t want help from the government, then fine — good luck with that — honestly.

Hillbilly Deluxe

August 26th, 2010
4:10 pm

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:10 pm

What? No Parade? Obama Pulls Out Before the Job is Completed.

WASHINGTON, Aug. 26, 2010 – Even after Operation New Dawn begins next week, U.S. military trainers will continue to help Iraqi security forces build the capabilities to maintain internal security and increasingly, to bolster their defenses against external threats as well, senior military officials in Iraq reported.

Army Maj. Gen. Stephen Lanza called yesterday’s rash of violence that largely targeted Iraqi security forces the enemy’s attempt to intimidate the Iraqi police and military and shake public confidence in their capabilities.

Lanza emphasized during an interview yesterday with American Forces Press Service the need for Iraqi security forces to remain vigilant against the al-Qaida network and others trying to derail progress, and cited U.S. support to ensure they’re up to the task.

Six U.S. “advise and assist” brigades fanned out across Iraq have embedded with their Iraqi counterparts to accelerate training and more quickly build both capability and capacity, he said.

“What we are expanding right now is not just building internal capability, but also an external capability to defend the borders,” Lanza said.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:10 pm

Mick, how old are you, 19?

Bosch, same question…

@@

August 26th, 2010
4:10 pm

Alright, I’ve just gotta mention this one. My Cajun neighbor has had to install three separate septic tanks. Why? Because the county inspectors assured them they were not in a flood plain.

Good thing they’re sitting on 11 acres. They’ll be needing every one of ‘em. The last septic tank was put in about 125 feet from their house…it’s up on a hill and required some kind of elaborate pumping system. When he contacted the county, their response was…

“Sorry, not our problem.”

Disgusted

August 26th, 2010
4:10 pm

Current retirees on average get out everything they paid in, with interest, in the first 4 years. Look it up.

I’m calling BS on your generalization, Harry. I’m old enough to draw Social Security. My Social Security statement shows that my employers and I paid in a total of $230,000, and since I’m still working, I’m still paying in. My wife and her employers paid in a total of a little over $70,000. We’re drawing a little under $36,000 a year in Social Security benefits. Do the math and tell me how I’m going to get our contributions out in four years.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:11 pm

Harry,

But those prescription drugs went through drug trials paid for by the federal government and approved by the FDA — so no drugs for you.

So, Harry is going to fight off a band of al-Qaida forces that show up to his house all alone. Again, good luck with that.

“I thought you libbies were opposed to the war on terror, Patriot act, etc”

Assume much? That’s your first problem.

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
4:12 pm

but the billets is in your pocket!

won’t abu bin terrorist laugh

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:12 pm

Granny Godzilla

August 26th, 2010
4:12 pm

damn…bullet bullet bullet

Mick

August 26th, 2010
4:14 pm

Harry

You are a fool. Social Security is not a complete retirement plan. It is the safety net of last resort so that people in old age can survive. Yeah, you’ve made the point about taking that money and investing in a mutual fund but remember sept. 08? Social security is one of the great innovations and the envy of many nations. Good for you and your fortune. I own properties, have a 401k and and retirement fund. I will be damn glad to collect my soc. sec. which I’ve paid into all my life. By the way, you have mocked $1500 a month from soc. sec. but check this out, you can go to belize and live like a king on that stipend – to each his own.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:14 pm

Disgusted…if you and your wife had put in your combined $300K over your life into a private account, evan at a very modest interest rate it would have more than doubled by now. Then, you could withdraw the same $36K per year as SSI will pay you, without ever touching the principal, and you could leave the $600K to your kids or grandkids. Which sounds like a better deal to you?

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:14 pm

HDB
August 26th, 2010
3:30 pm

Companies are in business to make “A PROFIT”. They can not make the rules/laws or print the money to make “A PROFIT”. If any company see’s the need to take jobs overseas to make “A PROFIT” that alone should WAKE YOU UP as to why they made that decision. ECON 101, man!

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:16 pm

Intown
August 26th, 2010
3:36 pm

” the GOP is looking like a dog that’s about to catch the car, with no idea whatsoever about what it ought to do next.”

I agree 100%. I also agreed with this sentiment when the Republicans took office at the State level in 2002. They still haven’t quite figured it out

We’ll take our chances. Since the current monkey administration is killing the Republic!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:16 pm

Mick…google “portfolio diversification” and get back to us. I lost very little in Sep 08, and have already made most of it up. The closer you get to retirement age, the more you move your investments away from volatile instruments like stocks. I need to start charging you guys for all this financial advice.

JohnnyReb

August 26th, 2010
4:17 pm

Bosch – the Unions and/or government did not intentionally run corporations overseas. The elimination of US jobs was/is collateral damage from over-the-top Union demands and government regulation. I have seen it time and time again over years. For example, California was the first state to rigidly enforce EPA regulations, even passing laws more stringent than Federal. End result? Corporations/manufacturing moved out of California to neighboring states. The taxes to the state of California declined. Expand that scenario to the whole USA and you have the current situation.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:18 pm

Bosch, why don’t you tell us what percentage of pharmaceutical R&D is government subsidized. I think the number is not as large as you think. But I know you’ve been trained like a hamster to understand that large corporations = boogeyman…

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:18 pm

landry

Is being GAY a political issue? Not talking marriage!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:19 pm

Bosch…

“But those prescription drugs went through drug trials paid for by the federal government and approved by the FDA — so no drugs for you.

So, Harry is going to fight off a band of al-Qaida forces that show up to his house all alone. Again, good luck with that.”

Bosch, simple response…I don’t live in fear like you do.

Paul

August 26th, 2010
4:19 pm

Harry

“roads,schools, police, firefighting, etc” Less than 1%. That stuff is all paid for by state and local. Nice try libbie, but no dice.”

You might want to review the stim program and subsequent passed legislation.

And Bosch was correct – you didn’t specify fed or state government, and you didn’t restrict it to the amount.

I take it you saw Kamchak was out and couldn’t answer your tax concern? Did you see this?:

Harry

Not sure what the point is – fairness, proportionality, whatever – but for married couples the rate begins at 10% of the amount (after deductions) over $17000 and 35 percent of the amount over $374,000. It’ll go up a few points if the cuts aren’t extended.

Anyhow, that’s a spread of about $350,000. Or, from the low end of 17k it’s about 22 times that amount to get to 374k.

That strikes me as a pretty tight range, especially given we have people making several million, several tens of millions, several hundreds of millions, and in the cases of some hedge funds, several billion dollars a year.

Do you think it right for a household to pay the same marginal tax rate as a household making 200 times less?

Maybe we should greatly reduce the rates we now have, then establish new brackets for people making over a million, 10 million, 100 million, or a billion a year?

Or do you think we should keep it the way it is, but reduce the rates for everybody while still maintaining the same rate for multimillion dollar earners as for a few hundred thousand dollar earners?

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:19 pm

Bosch
August 26th, 2010
3:45 pm

Did you ever take an ECON class? Did you get pass the 4th grade?

Paul

August 26th, 2010
4:20 pm

Bosch

So sorry about your mom.

Mick

August 26th, 2010
4:20 pm

**The closer you get to retirement age, the more you move your investments away from volatile instruments like stocks**

Harry – what are you a rock head? I’ve done all that PLUS soc. sec – jeez give it a break and realize that if it weren’t for soc. sec. many would have nothing, is that the kind of society you want to live in?

Paul

August 26th, 2010
4:20 pm

out for a while

TGT

August 26th, 2010
4:23 pm

“And in that kind of environment, Barack Obama will thrive. He may not get much done, but he will come off looking reasonable and mainstream while the Republicans make themselves look petty and extreme, setting the stage for Democratic successes in 2012.

Yeah, because he and the Dems have thrived so well these last couple of years–as evidenced by the sorry state of the Union and the sorry political prospects of their party.

“…the GOP is looking like a dog that’s about to catch the car, with no idea whatsoever about what it ought to do next.”

Because the GOP NEVER has any ideas. When the opposition is taking the country off a cliff “NO!” is enough of a strategy.

I have a political speculation of my own: The GOP will almost certainly win the House. They will pick up about 7 Senate seats. (The RCP “no toss-ups” has them gaining 7.) This will put the House in GOP hands and the Dems will hold the Senate at 52-48.

However, in the 2012 Senate elections hold a possibility for even greater Democrat Senate losses. In 2012 the Dems have to defend 23 seats (including 2 Ind.) while the GOP only has to defend 10. The 10 GOP seats are nearly all from states that were conservative strongholds before-during-and-after Obamamania. That is not nearly the case for the Dems. If Obama continues to cling to the extreme left–and there is little indication he won’t–not only will the GOP again win the House, but also likely win the White House and have a near super-majority in the Senate.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:23 pm

Bosch, when you say;

“So, Harry is going to fight off a band of al-Qaida forces that show up to his house all alone. Again, good luck with that.”

Are you hearing that the Democrats and/or Barack plan to increase defense spending and/or continue the war on terror? I hadn’t heard that. I heard Barack was basically going to fold a la Jimmy Carter. Please advise.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:24 pm

Harry,

That number doesn’t matter – it is subsidized by the federal government, and approved for consumption by the federal government, and since you do not want help from the federal government — you get no drugs.

And, you have to pay $15 a gallon for gas because of the subsidies going to the oil companies. K?

And, don’t plan any vacations in Yellowstone either.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reb,

Dang! Again, everytime I type your name, I capitalize the “e” — I think job outsourcing was a perfect storm of what you describe and globalization. It was kind of unavoidable actually — a perfect storm — and it’s hard to get back. I by no means think unions are perfect, but they have certainly done good things for the American worker, and still do. They are not as powerful as they once were — and it still bothers me for people to have the “you should be thankful that so and so let’s you work” because my gut reaction to that is “so and so should be thankful that I work for him making him money” — it’s just the difference in how we think is all. My finger still hurts!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:26 pm

Paul…I don’t think the government should take 40% of ANYBODY’S income. I just wasn’t raised to believe that you help yourself to otherpeople’s money. I hope that is not unclear. And we still haven’t heard from Kamchak.

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:27 pm

Who here still pays the hospital/doctor’s bill with any discounts? Who here pays for prescription drugs that supposedly has no generic brand?

You boys and girls do realize with ObamaCare, the medical industry is now government controlled and run!

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:28 pm

Thanks Paul — she passed away I think while you were in Ireland. Anywho — the past six weeks or so have really sucked. Have you ever probated a will?

@@

August 26th, 2010
4:28 pm

Hillbilly:

‘Phantom of the Fox’ may lose historic theater apartment

I predict that will never happen.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:28 pm

Bosch…with each post, you make yourself look dumber and dumber. Gas would be $15/gal without the subsidies? Really? Whay don’t you take $15, subtract the current price of gas (round up to $3) multiply that $12 times the number of gallons consumed each year, and tell us what the total federal subsidy is…I bet the number is like Doc’s “jigawatt” from Back to the Future.

And doesn’t it seem backwards to subsidize gasoline, then put a tax back on it? LMAO…oil company subsidies…

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:29 pm

“You boys and girls do realize with ObamaCare, the medical industry is now government controlled and run!”

Actually, no it’s not — doctors and nurses are not going to suddenly become government employees.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:31 pm

Bosch, why don’t you do a little research, and tell us what percent of the federal budget goes to;

1) defense
2) interest on the debt
3) Pharmaceutical subsidies
4) oil subsidies
5) infrastructure (roads, police fire, sewer, etc)
6) transfer payments (i.e. welfare)
7) waste

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:32 pm

HINT FOR BOSCH…#3,4, and 5 dont add up to a total of 3% altogether…

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:33 pm

Harry really? You don’t know that oil companies get subsidies? Um……..

Scout

August 26th, 2010
4:34 pm

I’m gone …………. new fun thread upstairs.

Hillbilly Deluxe

August 26th, 2010
4:34 pm

“you should be thankful that so and so let’s you work” because my gut reaction to that is “so and so should be thankful that I work for him making him money”

The employee can’t survive without the employer and the employer can’t survive without the employees. They are interdependent. No matter how smart Henry Ford was in coming up with the Model T, he could have built few, if any, all by his lonesome.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:34 pm

Harry, Harry, Harry, you are totally missing the point. YOU wrote that you don’t want any help from the government. It don’t care what percentage of all that adds up to. You don’t want help, fine — good luck on going back to living in the 1840s.

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:36 pm

Yes, Yes Hillbilly — Yes indeed. I’m going upstairs for a bit until I have to go pick up me precious daughter…..

I'm Here From The Government And I'm Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:37 pm

Bosch
August 26th, 2010
4:29 pm

“You boys and girls do realize with ObamaCare, the medical industry is now government controlled and run!”

Actually, no it’s not — doctors and nurses are not going to suddenly become government employees.

LOL :) Live and Learn!

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:37 pm

Bosch, just document those oil company subsidies and we’ll be done. Also, why don’t you tell us how much the oil companies paid in taxes last year. Again, thanks in advance.

Harry Callahan

August 26th, 2010
4:38 pm

Bosch, when your precious daughter becomes an adult, what do you think the tax rates will be to pay for Obama’s massive deficits? Thanks in advance.

Overtaxed

August 26th, 2010
4:41 pm

I keep hearing comments about tax rates. Fact: total tax revenues vs personal income, averaged over the last two years of Clinton’s regime, were 21.6%. That is, 21.6% of EVERY dollar that ultimately ended up in the hands of an income earner went to the federal government. Bush’s last two years? 20.5%. So we taxed our folks less. Yet federal revenues continued to grow. And the economy up until then? It grew at an even faster rate, hence taxes as a percent of GDP shrank.

Clinton’s era? Taxes started at 19.7%. They went up to 20.6%. And revenues did go up. But the GDP didn’t rise as fast.

Don’t belive me? Go find the data for yourself and plot it out. Total personal income, total GDP and total tax revenues. You can see example after example in the data where lower tax rates cause an increase in GDP and still result in rising tax revenues.

Housing throws all of this into a mess, and caused a complete economic meltdown. But thats another story.

Pogo

August 26th, 2010
4:43 pm

“Not Ready for Primetime Players” Jay?

Yea, but they’re going to whip your beloved democratic partys arse in November. Obama is a loser and the people of this country (and even more significantly his past supporters) know it. Current democratic/ progrssive strategy on the economy has proven to be even more detrimental to us than even that of Carter (or Bush, whichever you prefer) both of whom were losers. Obama and the “spendocrats” in congress have become laughing stock on the streets of this country.

I guess us “proletariat” must laugh at them because we are in misery and we must once again “suffer in quite desperation” until the next election. But the mood of this country is now turning to anger against the progressive tri-fecta of Obama, Pelosi and Reid. Obama and Biden have become even bigger clowns than even their detractors, such as myself, can believe. This country is being run by ideological (and in the case of Biden, mentally deficient) idiots and most everyone knows it except Jay, Cindy, the AJC, the NYT’s and the Washington Post (or so it seems). The people of this country now realize that they made a big mistake when they elected the progressive/socialist democrats to control both houses of Congress in 2006 and Obama to control the Executive branch in 2008. But the American people have always righted their wrongs in one way or the other. At least a piece of this one will be righted very soon.

This election is going to prove that the American people, while they may deviate out of what is rational once in a while (as in the case of the election of the blundering oaf Obama) always come “back to the fold” and the “the fold” is independent/conservative thought. Make no mistake, the majority of the “working class” in this country are conservative and they are independent. They only want what they earn and what is theirs but they damn well don’t like it when the government takes it from them and gives it to someone else who doesn’t. The current crop of socialists/progressives (Obama, Pelosi and Reid) only understand the theory of re-distribution of the working peoples money to those

So in the words of Wings, “Say bye bye” this year and in 2012 to the progressives and to which I say, “good riddance to bad rubbish”. Of course they’ll be back again in 10 or 15 years and the cycle will repeat itself until the country either comes to its senses or it is in ashes.

HDB

August 26th, 2010
4:46 pm

I’m Here From The Government And I’m Here To Help

August 26th, 2010
4:14 pm
HDB
August 26th, 2010
3:30 pm

Companies are in business to make “A PROFIT”. They can not make the rules/laws or print the money to make “A PROFIT”. If any company see’s the need to take jobs overseas to make “A PROFIT” that alone should WAKE YOU UP as to why they made that decision. ECON 101, man!

…and you wonder why the US is in the economic state it’s in?? There’s not a problem with gaining profit…but when it’s at the expense of the American WORKER….who fuels the DEMAND for the product….then it’s shortsighted for a corporation to take jobs offshore!! Look at the IT jobs taken offshore to India…..in many cases, they have to bring those jobs BACK!! If Corporate America would work on KEEPING the jobs here….probably a greater PROFIT MARGIN would happen…..

Jus’ sayin’…………….

Bosch

August 26th, 2010
4:48 pm

Harry,

“http://stephenleahy.net/2009/05/07/massive-subsidies-to-oil-companies-continue-podcast/”

There’s you some info on oil subsidies —

And I remember back in the 80s when everybody was using the same rhetoric “your kids/grandkids are gonna be paying for this” — it really is just a recycled phrase. Since I was a kid back then — I guess that would mean me now….paying for whatever it was they were griping about back then — and ya’ know? I do pretty okay for myself, so if I am paying for anything that was supposed to ruin the country back then, then I guess I don’t notice so much because it certainly hasn’t kept me from having a nice life.

buck@gon

August 27th, 2010
10:50 am

Funny,

The Democrat’s main not-ready-for-primetime player is President.

So much for hope and change.