Over at Andrew Breitbart’s site, the day’s featured video is a compilation of remarks by Barack Obama, Harry Reid and other Democratic senators back in 2005, in which they strongly condemn Republicans for considering what was called “the nuclear option.”
At the time, the Democratic minority in the Senate was filibustering to block confirmation of some of President Bush’s judicial nominees. Frustrated, Republicans threatened to retaliate by rewriting Senate rules to permanently strip minority senators of the right to filibuster such nominations.
That was hardly the only change being contemplated. Rewriting Senate rules requires a two-thirds majority, which the Republicans didn’t have. So the Republicans were threatening to strip the minority of its historic right to filibuster by ignoring the equally historic requirement of a two-thirds majority to change Senate rules. If carried out, such a revolution would permanently alter the core nature and tradition of the Senate.
Hence, the term “nuclear option.”
The change was so controversial that in the end, senators cut a deal, with Democrats allowing some of the nominations to go through and the Republicans agreeing to drop the nuclear option.
Here’s that video:
The video is clearly intended to depict the Democrats as hypocrites, since Reid and Obama are now threatening to use the Senate reconciliation process to pass health-insurance reform. Reading through the comments at Breitbart’s site, that’s exactly how his audience is taking it — as vile hypocrisy.
But they’re swallowing sucker bait.
The problem is, the “nuclear option” that Democrats railed against in 2005 is not reconciliation, any more than a hammer is an orange. They aren’t even close to the same thing, and the folks at Breitbart are probably smart enough to know it.
The reconciliation process is outlined in existing Senate rules as a legitimate means to avoid the filibuster. Its use requires no rule changes, permanent or temporary, and no abandonment of Senate tradition. Reconciliation is itself part of that tradition. As Reid pointed out yesterday, reconciliation has been used 21 times since 1981, most often by Republican majorities. It’s a standard parliamentary option.
And as NPR reports, its use has often involved health-care reform.
“In fact, the way in which virtually all of health reform, with very, very limited exceptions, has happened over the past 30 years has been the reconciliation process,” says Sara Rosenbaum, who chairs the Department of Health Policy at George Washington University.
For example, the law that lets people keep their employers’ health insurance after they leave their jobs is called COBRA, not because it has anything to do with snakes, but because it was included as one fairly minor provision in a huge reconciliation bill, she says.
“The correct name is continuation benefits. And the only reason it’s called COBRA is because it was contained in the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985; and that is how we came up with the name COBRA,” she says.
So what we have here are two issues:
One, reconciliation is not the “nuclear option.” If Breitbart wants to dig out video of Democrats complaining in such dire terms about previous GOP use of reconcilation, that would be fine and would certainly be evidence of Dem hypocrisy. But apparently he can’t.
And that gets us to the second, more important point. The Breitbart site is lying. He is playing his audience for fools, and the sad part is that they don’t mind, because in return they get the reassurance that their hatred of the other side is justified. Everybody wins, right?
Well, no. We all have honest differences of opinion. We all bring our own perspectives to the debate. We all think that we’re right and they’re wrong, whoever “we” and “they” may be.
But this isn’t spin, this is willful, gross deception. And such blatant disregard for the facts makes meaningful debate and communication impossible; in fact, in cases like this it is designed to do precisely that.
Surely, those on the right will be able to cite what they see as examples of similar behavior on the left, and of course are free to post them here. I make no claims that either side has a monopoly on the problem. But such deception by any party is truly the “nuclear option,” and if we’re not careful it will undermine both our country and democracy.
The effort to at least try to be honest in our discussion, even if our own bias means we come up short, ought to be the minimum required of responsible citizenship
496 comments Add your comment
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:11 pm
But…but…but Breitbart is like the Bible!
Bud Wiser
February 24th, 2010
3:13 pm
So how does this “unconscionable deception” not apply to global warming? (debunked)
Fannie May / Freddy Mac loan practices? (overlooked)
Obama’s tax cheats he appointed? (too numerous to mention)
Vann Jones?
Charlie Rangel?
I could list hundreds, perhaps thousands, but I have made my point.
Obama’s ‘nuclear option’ is self inflicted (political) suicide he wants his minions to make, in an effort to prop up his lowering approval numbers.
Talk about deception…………
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:14 pm
Willful, gross deception – sounds like a lot of republicants I’ve come in contact with.
stands for decibels
February 24th, 2010
3:14 pm
that’s exactly how his audience is taking it
what’s that? Breitbart’s audience believes stupid, made-up stuff?
Bud Wiser
February 24th, 2010
3:15 pm
I heard today that Congress’ approval ratings have sunk to a shocking 10%.
Obowo will have no conscious whatsoever about feeding that kind of garbage to the wolves; problem is getting the wolves to bite.
Kamchak
February 24th, 2010
3:15 pm
Why did the Republicans threaten the nuclear option back in 2005? If the reconciliation process doesn’t involve a two-thirds majority rule change, why didn’t they use that instead?
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:16 pm
Kamchak, reconciliation is limited to spending-related matters, and is not available on votes such as confirmations.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:16 pm
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:11 pm
So the video, and the speakers in the video, are to be discredited? LOL!!!
NowReally
February 24th, 2010
3:17 pm
And I thought the rabid comments by our conservative friends on this site were HARSH. The people who commented on that site are down right mean spirited and ugly. They make the regulars on this blog look like Sunday School teachers.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:19 pm
Jay said “But this isn’t spin, this is willful, gross deception. And such blatant disregard for the facts makes meaningful debate and communication impossible; in fact, in cases like this it is designed to do precisely that.”
I guess it’s sort of like, “I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinski,….. “
Disgusted
February 24th, 2010
3:21 pm
So how is it that Senate Republicans could use reconciliation to pass the Bush tax cuts, with only 50 votes in favor and Dick Cheney breaking the tie, but now it’s an abuse if the Democrats use it to pass a health care bill? Is reconciliation acceptable only if it’s initiated by Republicans?
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:22 pm
The people who read Breitbart or watch SaudiFaux News don’t care that they are being lied to over and over again. They like the lies so they continue to visit.
They have a desire for the world to be a particular way and when they are provided a fantasy medium that delivers on their desires, they are happy.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:22 pm
These are the 2005 quotes about using a 51 person Senate majority. There is no distinction about what is being proposed, it’s merely statements against the use of the “nuclear option”. Hilarious
“…will change the character of the Senate forever”….Barack Obama
“…that’s just not what the founders intended”….Barack Obama
W said “change the rules, do it the way I want it done”……Hilary Clinton
“…you have to restrain yourself Mr. President.”……Hilary Clinton
“We are on the precipice of a crisis, a Constitutional crisis”……Chuck Shumer
“the checks and balances which have been at the core of this Republic are about to be evaporated by the nuclear option”…….Chuck Shumer
“the nuclear option, if successful, will turn the Senate into a body that could have its rules broken at any time by a majority of Senators…”….Diane Feinstein
“This nuclear option is an ultimate example of the arrogance of power. It is a fundamental power grab…”….Joe Biden
“..arrogance of power of this republican administration…”….Harry Reid
“I pray God when the Democrats take back control we don’t make the kind of naked power grab you are doing.”….Joe Biden
“…what were the framers thinking about 218 years ago. They understood. Mr. President, there is a tyranny of the majority”….Chris Dodd
Go ahead, libs, deny, spin, twist, warp, etc.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:22 pm
Yes it is, Jimmy.
And as I’ve mentioned here before, I urged Clinton’s resignation over that.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:24 pm
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:22 pm
Strong words from someone who regularly cuts and pasted the Huffington Post, NY Times, Daily Kos, etc.
So Breitbart has doctored this video? Perhaps they did voice overs. Yeah, that’s it. Dick Cheney got some sound alikes and had Breitbart do voice overs. Yeah!!
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:24 pm
Have you no shame, Jimmy?
Reconciliation is not the nuclear option. Period.
Yet to make yourself feel better about your political choices, you’re willing to ignore reality and embrace deception.
stands for decibels
February 24th, 2010
3:25 pm
Not-fit-to-carry-Jimmy-Carter’s jockstrap @ 3.22, those guys weren’t talking about the use of reconciliation to pass a bill.
But, nice try.
Kamchak
February 24th, 2010
3:26 pm
Jay
Thanks.
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
3:26 pm
It’s all a matter of whose ox is getting gored. They’re all politicians and in many cases, hypocrisy comes with the territory. The in crowd will always try to walk all over the out crowd and the out crowd will always holler like a stuck hog.
Scooter
February 24th, 2010
3:28 pm
They have a desire for the world to be a particular way and when they are provided a fantasy medium that delivers on their desires, they are happy.
Pot meet kettle!
md
February 24th, 2010
3:28 pm
Oh heavens, not slanted news from a media source. Tell me its not so.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:29 pm
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:24 pm
You’re the authority on all things evil with conservatives, Jay. Shoot, you don’t even need the nuclear option. As a member of the “Freedom of the Press” corp. you singlehandedly have the ability to suppress anything I, or others, post. You can ban us temporarily or permanently, without filibuster or through exercising the nuclear option.
Sam
February 24th, 2010
3:29 pm
jay, save you’re breath. they like being lied to, as long as it fits into their narrow world view its cool….
Doggone/GA
February 24th, 2010
3:29 pm
“Tell me its not so”
It isn’t so. “slanting
Outhouse GoKart
February 24th, 2010
3:29 pm
Hammers, Oranges…we making orange juice here?
Regardless I say “Barry and Dems…GO FOR BROKE!!” and setup the next 12 years or Republican reign.
Doggone/GA
February 24th, 2010
3:29 pm
oops!
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:29 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
3:26 pm
Harumph, harumph!!
Sam
February 24th, 2010
3:30 pm
right on Hillbilly….
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:30 pm
“The effort to at least try to be honest in our discussion, even if our own bias means we come up short, ought to be the minimum required of responsible citizenship”
In my mind that applies those on here who use words such as dummycrats, and republicants, obozo etc…
Whacks Eloquent
February 24th, 2010
3:30 pm
Jay, have you heard whether or not the House voted to remove anti-trust exemption to the health insurance industry? That arcane provision needs to be done away with – I can’t think of an industry that the American people benefit from having anti-trust exemption.
And I agree, the reconciliation plan being touted by Democrats is not the same as what Republicans wanted in 2005. They were trying to clear a logjam of judicial nominees…but I did not like their plan either. Democrats can try reconciliation, but it may wind up being a kamikaze mission…ask whether it is worth it. Would liberals really say health care is that much more important that it is worth risking the elections on? It would seriously limit President Obama’s goals for the remainder of his first term if the GOP sweeps back into Congressional majority.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:33 pm
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:24 pm
“Embrace deception”? I would have been doing so had I believed your previous article where you stated you did not blame W for the current economic mess we find ourselves in.
scrappy
February 24th, 2010
3:33 pm
Thanks for pointing out the difference between these two options. I am meeting some friends for drinks later tonight and that always brings out the liberal/Obama bashing, I love being able to throw a fact back to them and prove them wrong. One comment, one friend at a time, I will show them that the right-radio-talking heads are making things up!
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:33 pm
I would agree, jewcowboy.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:33 pm
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:30 pm
Looks like we’re agreeing on yet something else.
Whacks Eloquent
February 24th, 2010
3:35 pm
That said, I think it is a bit sneaky that reconciliation is used by either side to do anything other than just get a budget through so that the government can keep functioning. I use that last word lightly…
Sneaky? What the heck am I thinking? We are talking about politicians…who have similar personality traits to serial killers! (from FBI BAU – yeah like the show Criminal Minds!) Awesome show BTW!
Whacks Eloquent
February 24th, 2010
3:38 pm
off-topic…
What, GEORGIA hosted a high-speed rail consortium for the Southeast states?
Well that is the surprise of the day!
http://www.dot.ga.gov/localgovernment/intermodalprograms/Documents/1-26-10.pdf
stands for decibels
February 24th, 2010
3:38 pm
Would liberals really say health care is that much more important that it is worth risking the elections on?
That question presupposes that there is no risk in allowing HCR to die on the vine.
Mid-terms are won by getting your base fired up. And there ain’t no base that’s gonna go the extra mile this November, to support weak-kneed Dems who couldn’t deliver on their single most significant 2008 domestic-policy pledge. Na gone duit.
Dave R.
February 24th, 2010
3:40 pm
So, under Jay’s rules, anytime a Democrat comes out and says the GOP doesn’t have a proposed plan regarding health care reform, that is now considered a “conscious effort to deceive”?
And it is now unacceptable to say as much?
Works for me.
Can’t wait for Jay’s next editorial denouncing Robert Gibbs, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid for their “unacceptable” efforts to deceive.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:40 pm
Would liberals really say health care is that much more important that it is worth risking the elections on?
If the purpose of politics is to get re-elected, then no.
If the purpose of politics is to help the country, then yes.
Whacks Eloquent
February 24th, 2010
3:41 pm
db, good point. Glad I am not employed as a Democrat strategist! They must be keeping Rolaids in business right now! It is definitely a calculated risk – whatever course of action they take.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:43 pm
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:40 pm
Gee, count me in with the majority of Americans who don’t believe the proposed healthcare plan will actually “help the country”.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:43 pm
Jimmy Carter @ 3.33,
That is 3, the Mayan calendar must right, the world is coming to an end
Just kidding. I’ve never understood why it is necessary for some to use words such as that. For those who use them, It undermines their argument and is simply a way for them to disparage an opposing perspective while showing everyone that they are closed minded. If one’s argument cannot stand without denigrating another with silly name calling, then perhaps one needs rethink their premise.
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:46 pm
Max Blumenthal: Feeling The Hate At CPAC 2010 With Andrew Breitbart, Hannah Giles And The Crazy Mob
Thank you, Mr Blumenthal, for revealing the underlying bigotry of these hardcore conservatives masquerading as constitutional advocates who are continually quoting many of our misguided slave-holding founding fathers and their vision of how and what America should be.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/feeling-the-hate-at-cpac_b_474077.html
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:46 pm
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:43 pm
You know, you and I probably have a lot more in common than most would think. But if we went somewhere together you’d have to drive. That way you could be on the left and I could be on the right.
md
February 24th, 2010
3:46 pm
“In my mind that applies those on here who use words such as dummycrats, and republicants, obozo etc…”
Hear, hear…….
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
3:46 pm
Too bad Bookman; did not notice all this vile behavior when it started the day Bush became president of the USA. The vilification of Bush never stopped. It continued for eight years and destroyed all confidence in anything Democrats suggest now..
Bookman wants us to be ” good citizens.”.Republicans must understand and appreciate anything Obama wants Congress to pass. Fortunately, Congress hears the voice of citizens renouncing Obama’s health plan even as he tries with “nuclear option” or any other twist or turn he can bring forward. Good citizens or not, Americans do not want his health plan
As to Breitbart deceiving us, I have never read him. Don’t plan to either. But I do know that I do not want Obama’s health plan. But he’s not listening. Neither is Bookman . He’s reading Breitbart
Yep, one source, and everybody is lying. Way to go, Bookman, but nothing new.
Before someone pipes up saying “I want Obama’s health plan.”, I only give my impression of what I’ve seen, read, heard and my own opinion.. I will not be led like a sheep to the slaughter just to prove that “I’m a GOOD CITIZEN”, I hope the rest of you are not ready to be led where you don’t want to go.; to government being your doctor. NO WAY!
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:47 pm
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
3:46 pm
You see, I knew you’d link to a Huffington Post article.
md
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
“Mid-terms are won by getting your base fired up.”
I’d have to disagree – like all elections in recent times, its convincing the swing vote, and from what I’m seeing, they done swung.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
Gee, count me in with the majority of Americans who don’t believe the proposed healthcare plan will actually “help the country”.
No problem, Jimmy, that’s just an honest political disagreement.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
You know, all this talk about whether or not the healthcare plan will be good for America overlooks the fact that we have to convince CHINA it’s good for them, else we can’t fund it.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
Jimmy Carter,
“That way you could be on the left and I could be on the right.”
Or maybe just switch seats to gain a new perspective?
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:50 pm
md
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
Nice!
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:50 pm
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
Hear, hear!!
Normal
February 24th, 2010
3:52 pm
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
3:43 pm
Well said and quite right(no pun intended)
-=————————————–
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:46 pm
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
3:52 pm
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:49 pm
Wow, no condescending “have you no shame” opener?
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:54 pm
I have no problem with honest disagreement and honest discussion, Jimmy. It’s the other kind that bothers me, because it makes debate impossible.
Bud Wiser
February 24th, 2010
3:56 pm
Jay, you said: …”Well, no. We all have honest differences of opinion. We all bring our own perspectives to the debate….
We may debate here, but in Washington, since BO took hold, there has been no debate.
Virtually every single amendment (maybe a handful got through) proposed by Republicans never even made it out of committee, stored gored and ignored by the ranking Democrats. The Repugs became the “party of no” in the sense that the Dems said, “no, we’re not interested in what you have to say, you had your chance.”
Yet the dimwittocrats could not even pass 1 single piece of meaningful legislation with the supposed ’super majority’ because of their own infighting, that, plus Obowo’s psycho fixation on his version and his party’s version of health care reform that the majority of Americans does not even want. They want health care reform, but just not his or his party’s sole determination of what it should be.
Yet the Dems move on, trying yet again tomorrow.
Sad.
Sad and pathetic.
November shall not arrive here soon enough..
Till then we shall still be watching this pathetic group of losers trying to cram down America’s throat something they do not want.
I only have 4 more words to say:
Virginia
New Jersey
Massachusetts
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:01 pm
“The Repugs became the “party of no” …”
“Yet the dimwittocrats …”
“plus Obowo’s psycho fixation on his version…”
And there we have it.
md
February 24th, 2010
4:01 pm
Hate to break it to you Jay, but there are mnay of us that no longer believe any news sources. Once the corporations and power brokers started buying them all up, its been all downhill.
Goes along with the mantra – believe none of what you hear and half of what you see………..
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:02 pm
Jay
February 24th, 2010
3:54 pm
Well then I guess you and I will be unable to engage in “honest disagreement and honest discussion”. After all, you said I was “willing to ignore reality and embrace deception.”
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:05 pm
md
February 24th, 2010
4:01 pm
Agreed. I always think of Walter Cronkite in times like these. A giant in the industry, yet I don’t recall hearing his political views injected in to his broadcast. It was after he retired that I read something along the lines that he was a Socialist or something like that. Don’t tear me up if I’m wrong, but I do remember many people being surprised about his political views because the didn’t play his cards for all to see when he was with CBS.
Goodnight Chet….Goodnight David….and goodnight for NBC News.
Huntley and Brinkley, Walter Cronkite, man, those were the days!
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:06 pm
by the way, Breitbart is just a d bag with a website…alot like TMZ really….so who cares?
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:07 pm
Jimmy, what was wrong with Jay’s observation? seems right on from here…
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:07 pm
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:06 pm
Did you come up with that one all by yourself, or did you first check out the Huffington Post?
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:09 pm
Bud, they passed to TARP and ARRA. those were meaningful pieces of legislation…they just passed a job bill…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:14 pm
Matilda–If you’re still on board, here’s “our” song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zD-_KYEDugI
“I’d rather feel pain than nothing at all……..”
Vinny
February 24th, 2010
4:14 pm
Same difference Jay – The dems are attaching this “health care” monstrosity that will eventually take over 17% of our economy onto a “spending bill” so that they can use reconcilliation.
They know that the bill is a piece of crap and it won’t pass on it’s own, so they are using their own version of the “nuclear option”.
Nice try though.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:15 pm
JCB @ 4:01 – unfortunately, that is ALL he has.
Pathetic, isn’t it?
md
February 24th, 2010
4:15 pm
Question for you Sam – how many times do the taxpayers get to bail out Chrysler?
How many corporations in this country have not been bailed out? Why the difference?
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:17 pm
Vinny,
pretty much like those tax cuts in 2002?
you know – the ones directed primarily to the rich? the ones that did absolutely nothing for the middle class and poor?
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:19 pm
Breitbart needs to invest in a capable web page designer.
Yeech!!
Vinny
February 24th, 2010
4:19 pm
I’m middle class and received a tax cut. Those were great times for our economy.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:20 pm
“They know that the bill is a piece of crap and it won’t pass on it’s own, so they are using their own version of the “nuclear option”.
Vinny–Far and away, the biggest problem in our health care system is cost. Not quality, not accessibility, but cost. Somehow, the Democrats believe that forcing everyone to purchase health care insurance is going to lower the overall costs. Never mind the fact that it is the third-party payment system itself which has led to the high costs in the first place due to unnecessary administrative costs along with waste and fraud that consumers now turn a blind eye toward simply because they aren’t pulling any money out of their own pockets.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:22 pm
“you know – the ones directed primarily to the rich? the ones that did absolutely nothing for the middle class and poor?”
I guess I need to count Midori among the liberals here whose views have no relationship to reality:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/67479-comparing-income-taxes-clinton-vs-bush
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:23 pm
Midori,
” the ones that did absolutely nothing for the middle class and poor?”
That is not true…they ensured greater income disparity for the middle class/poor and the wealthy. That’s something. Not something good, but something.
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:23 pm
whats huffingon post?
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:24 pm
not sure MD…how many?
Ragnar Danneskjöld
February 24th, 2010
4:25 pm
A conscious effort to deceive is unacceptable. The reconciliation process is designed for the narrow purpose of passing a budget. Anysuggestion that reconciliation has ever been intended as a way to sidestep the difficulties of major legislative reform in the senate may be described as “deceptive.” On this point Andrew Breitbart is less deceptive than our genial host. Such a misuse of a budget clearing device to affect major policy change is, indeed, nuclear.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:27 pm
better watch out, JCB.
Next some will be calling you a misinformed, lying liberal!!!!
Ragnar Danneskjöld
February 24th, 2010
4:27 pm
Having argued that the use of the budget process, to impose a highly undesired new program on the sheep, is unprecedented, I confess that I hope the democrats do so. The mere name “democrat” will be poison at the polling place in November.
AF
February 24th, 2010
4:27 pm
“A conscious effort to deceive is unacceptable.”
“Unacceptable.” What an old fashioned word. To even use the word implies that there is some definition of what is and is not acceptable. It implies there is a right and a wrong, a truth and a lie, good and bad behavior. (I am remembering how often I used that word with my child. At about 10 she tried that stunt of rolling her eyes and saying “whatever” until I grounded her about ten times for doing that.)
Amongadults, in order for there to be acceptable behavior there has to be some agreement on right, wrong, truth, lie, good, bad. We don’t seem to have such an ethos.
What Beatlebug did was acceptable to those who support stopping the Dems. Acceptable means that it accomplishes the purpose.
I know what you mean, Jay. And I am sickened by there being no boundries anymore. Ethics doesn’t matter as long as it works. As in your last subject here, it isn’t just Pus who do it, although they are masterful at it.
Oh, well. Another letter to my Senators and representative.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:28 pm
Vinny,
“I’m middle class and received a tax cut.”
“The TaxPolicyCenter data show that the combined effect of the tax cuts in 2004 is as follows:
■The one-fifth of households in the middle of the income spectrum will receive an average tax cut of $647.
■The top one percent of households will receive tax cuts averaging almost $35,000 — or 54 times as much as that received on average by those in the middle of the income spectrum.
■Households with incomes above $1 million will receive tax cuts averaging about $123,600. The tax cuts for millionaires will cause their after-tax income to jump by 6.4 percent, nearly three times the percentage increase received by the middle fifth.
The overall shares of the tax cuts that are going to different households also are illuminating. The TaxPolicyCenter data show that:
■In 2004, the middle 20 percent of households will receive 8.9 percent of the tax cuts.
■By contrast, millionaires — totaling just 0.2 percent of U.S. households — will receive 15.3 percent of the tax cuts. In other words, the small handful of millionaires will receive total tax cuts far larger than those received by the entire middle 20 percent of households.
■The tax cuts will confer more than $30 billion on the nation’s 257,000 millionaires in 2004 alone.” ~ Center on Budget and Policy Priorites
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:28 pm
“I have no problem with honest disagreement and honest discussion, Jimmy. It’s the other kind that bothers me, because it makes debate impossible.”
“Do you really want your sincerity, judgment and honesty to be gauged by that claim? Come on. You know better.”
So, I guess questioning someone’s sincerity, judgment and honesty qualifies as “healthy debate”? Just curious…….
(We’re all human)
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
4:29 pm
What’d I do. I didn’t do nothing. Go Dawgs. By the way, good work, Jay. Of course, you realize that this means war. I’ll just push through my legislation at 11:59:59 on the last day that the government can legally stay open without a new budget. You cannot stop me.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:29 pm
Midori,
“Next some will be calling you a misinformed, lying liberal!!!!”
Too late. Did you not see NIF’s rant last night against me?
Number1ninja
February 24th, 2010
4:29 pm
But lost in all this is how quickly the borg can receive its new disinformation and repeat it ad nauseum.
Matilda
February 24th, 2010
4:30 pm
“We” don’t have a song, dude. I have a song. It’s called, “My big jealous boyfriend doesn’t think you’re funny.” Do you know it?
Pat
February 24th, 2010
4:30 pm
Sorry Jay, but the mouth-breathing ditto-heads who troll on your site are exactly the type of “suckers” for whom such sites (and the entire Faux “News” Broadcasts) are intended. Stupid people love being lied to, when it confirms previously held prejudices and reinforces ignorance.
Scout
February 24th, 2010
4:31 pm
The very definition of the word “politician” to me means “distrust”.
The very definition of the word “journalist” to means “verify”.
Bottom line?
Each have become two of the least respected occupations one can have but somehow we still find the type of people willing to maintain the traditions of both.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:32 pm
JCB,
I tend to scroll past idiotic nonsense such as that.
DoggoneGA
February 24th, 2010
4:33 pm
“Somehow, the Democrats believe that forcing everyone to purchase health care insurance is going to lower the overall costs. ”
Actually, no “we” don’t. We think it will help lower the cost to the PATIENT. The overall cost of healthcare is a different issue, and it too needs to be addressed. But no matter which system you prefer: mandated insurance, single-payer, government run…the “company” with the most paying “customer” had the greatest bargaining strength. Which is why group plans can negotiate better healthcare costs than a single person with an individual plan can possibly negotiate.
Which brings me to a perpetual lament of mine: WHY can’t these insurance companies create “group” plans for their current individual buyers, as well as those currently uninsured? Why not? I have yet to see this even brought up in the dicsussions, let alone seen anyone try to answer it. If they would do that, they could probably kill “reform” dead.
Sam
February 24th, 2010
4:34 pm
Rag, does this HC legislation affect the budget? is there budget involved in the bill…yepper! its been used many times beyond the original intent of strict budget resolutions..
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:34 pm
Pat
February 24th, 2010
4:30 pm
Spoken like a charter member of MSNBC.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:35 pm
“The TaxPolicyCenter data show that the combined effect of the tax cuts in 2004 is as follows”
Which proves only that you can pretty much paint any picture you want depending on how you present the statistics. Your figures would be more honest if you compared the amount of the reductions with what the folks were paying to begin with. Stating absolute amounts doesn’t mean much otherwise. I think Jay’s figures from yesterday’s column paint a more accurate picture by framing the argument in terms of % of the total tax revenues collected by income level and by comparing the % of total income each person is paying by income level. When you look at it either of those ways, the rich are paying the vast majority of the total taxes collected AND the highest percentage of their total income in taxes than any other income group.
Since the “poor” are already paying little or no taxes, jewcowboy, what specific change in the tax code would make things more “fair”?
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:37 pm
““My big jealous boyfriend doesn’t think you’re funny.” Do you know it?”
Out of curiosity, why do you feel the need to threaten people because you don’t like what they said about you on a blog?
Jay
February 24th, 2010
4:37 pm
Ragnar, if you want to argue that this is an inappropriate use of reconciliation, that’s at least an honest argument.
It is not honest to pretend that reconciliation is the “nuclear option.” That’s a lie.
Scout
February 24th, 2010
4:39 pm
Local Headline: “Is Freaknik returning? A Web site says the event will come back in April, but Atlanta’s mayor doesn’t think it will happen.”
Oh good! Live sex acts on the hoods of cars on Peachtree Street again. Just some kids having fun. Nothing you wouldn’t have seen on Peachtree in the 40’s and 50’s right ?
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:41 pm
Scout:
Freaknik returning?
“NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO”…………..
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
4:41 pm
I love reconciliation. How do you think Bush got all those tax cuts passed. All he had to do was conveniently leave off the cost of the wars from the budget and then promise to raise the taxes ten years down the road after he was out of office in order to pay for it. Of course, then the great recession hit and all those unregulated credit default swaps that I was told to take credit for thinking up way back then… anyway, the rest is history in the making and that’s why I like it in Switzerland.
Matilda
February 24th, 2010
4:43 pm
That wasn’t a threat, dude. It was a response to your randomly inappropriate music post with my name on it, that has nothing to do with anything being discussed here. I “got” it this morning: I’ll never have your respect. Thanks for sharing. I have now met my quota of off-topic posts. My apologies.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:43 pm
“We think it will help lower the cost to the PATIENT.”
And how is that? By perpetuating an inefficient system which breeds dishonesty?
Either full-blown socialistic health care or a truly capitalistic system in which insurance is returned to its rightful place as a hedge against catastrophic loss will lower both the overall costs AND the cost per patient. The current health care bill is neither.
Scout
February 24th, 2010
4:44 pm
Did anyone remember to ask Amy Carter about this “nuclear option” thing ?
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:44 pm
“Stupak: 15-20 Dems Withholding Support For White House Health Plan… ”
Hmm, I guess these people just refuse to engage in “honest disagreement and honest discussion”. I guess they are just “willing to ignore reality and embrace deception.”
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
4:45 pm
“I’ll never have your respect. Thanks for sharing.”
I think you know that’s not true, Matilda. From what you have said on the blog, you are a hard-working single mother just trying to get by in this world. For that, I have the utmost respect.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:47 pm
Bruno,
“Since the “poor” are already paying little or no taxes, jewcowboy, what specific change in the tax code would make things more “fair”?”
My response was in response to this post:
“I’m middle class and received a tax cut” ~ Vinny
It shows that, indeed, the middle class may have received a tax break, the greater percentage of the tax breaks went to the wealthy.
Here is the report…
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1811
Table 3 shows this more clearly.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:47 pm
“Hillary Clinton says domestic politics hurting US abroad… ”
Slick way of saying you’re not doing your job as Secretary of State. This will be yet another issue she will use to run in 2012.
DoggoneGA
February 24th, 2010
4:48 pm
“And how is that?”
By bringing insurance premiums into a range that are affordable for most people. It’s easier to pay $100 a month than $3000 a month, and it’s easier to pay $200 a month than it is to pay $40,000 that you might owe if you get sick and don’t have insurance to help pay for that cost.
“By perpetuating an inefficient system which breeds dishonesty?”
I already said that overall costs are something that ALSO needs to be addressed, but yes, if it means – in the short run – perpetuating an inefficient system in order to get universal coverage, then that is what it takes. It doesn’t mean we can NEVER address the other issues, but they will have to be addressed separately.
Personally, I would prefer a single-payer system.
Drew
February 24th, 2010
4:48 pm
Enter your comments here
Jay
February 24th, 2010
4:48 pm
So Bruno, under the “truly capitalistic system in which insurance is returned to its rightful place as a hedge against catastrophic loss” approach:
How would we handle the significant part of the population for whom a non-catastrophic loss — say $5,000 or $2,000 — is a lot more than they could afford? And would you make catastrophic insurance mandatory, and if so would you subsidize it for those unable to afford it?
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:50 pm
“Hoyer: Obama’s Health Care Tax Hikes Just ‘A Suggestion’… ”
Nice diversion. This rep is saying Obama’s tax hikes to pay for his costly healthcare plan is “just a suggestion”. Sliiiiiick.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:51 pm
Midori,
“I tend to scroll past idiotic nonsense such as that.”
Sometimes it’s amusing to just stir the pot when you see absurd gibbering.
Scout
February 24th, 2010
4:53 pm
Headline: “New Missile Defense Agency Logo Causes Online Commotion…”
Hummmm ………… check it out and see why ……………
http://www.mda.mil/index.html
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:54 pm
Jay
February 24th, 2010
4:48 pm
Perhaps it would be easier if you would please let us “uninformed” know what the cost of Obama’s plan truly is. Also, just how will he, or China, pay for it while simultaneously reducing the deficit? We’re already spending more than we bring in yet you are apparently endorsing a healthcare plan that will add substantially to that burden.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:55 pm
JCB,
Speaking of “absurd gibbering”, our resident faux president is on quite a roll today.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:56 pm
Jimmy Carter,
“Slick way of saying you’re not doing your job as Secretary of State.”
It is hard to do your job when Congress won’t follow through on its duty. Her argument seems quite reasonable and makes much sense on the international level. Notice how she does not lay blame with either party.
“Testifying before a congressional committee, Clinton said fights between the White House and Congress have led to “gridlock” in appointing officials to critical positions, including those with key foreign policy and international assistance responsibilities. That has created confusion among friends and allies, she said.”
“”It became harder and harder to explain to countries, particularly countries of significance, why we had nobody in position for them to interact with,” Clinton said.”
“In another case, earlier this year several State Department appointees were among dozens caught in a blanket hold on Obama nominees by Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., who placed it over concerns about a Air Force refueling tanker contrac in his home state and a new FBI explosives center he wants built there.”
“People don’t understand the way our system operates, they just don’t get it,” she said. “And their view does color whether the United States … is in a position going forward to demonstrate the kind of unity and strength and effectiveness that I think we have to in this very complex and dangerous world.”
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:58 pm
so, what’s the solution JC?
Lemme guess!!
TAX CUTS!!
Right?
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
4:59 pm
The good news about this administration’s success in righting the ship are just pouring in.
“WASHINGTON (AP) — Sales of new homes plunged to a record low in January, underscoring the formidable challenges facing the housing industry as it tries to recover from the worst slump in decades.
The Commerce Department reported Wednesday that new home sales dropped 11.2 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual sales pace of 309,000 units, the lowest level on records going back nearly a half century. The big drop was a surprise to economists who were expecting a 5 percent increase over December’s pace.”
Drew
February 24th, 2010
4:59 pm
“So, under Jay’s rules, anytime a Democrat comes out and says the GOP doesn’t have a proposed plan regarding health care reform, that is now considered a ‘conscious effort to deceive’?”
No, because the Republicans don’t have a plan. There are Republicans that have proposed plans – like Paul Ryan’s plan to gut Medicare and Social Security – but none of them have been endorsed by the caucus as a whole, and the leadership won’t be bringing any of them to the summit. When the Republican leadership stands behind a plan like the Democratic leadership has, then the Republican Party will have a plan.
Honestly, the fact that the Republican Party did nothing to reform the health care system when it controlled every branch of government should be evidence that not only do they not have a plan, they don’t think the nation has a problem.
“this talk about whether or not the healthcare plan will be good for America overlooks the fact that we have to convince CHINA it’s good for them, else we can’t fund it.”
You must have this plan confused with the Republican Party’s debt-financed Medicare Part D. Unlike that plan, which added hundreds of billions in long-term debt, the Democratic Party’s health care reform plan not only pays for itself, it reduces the deficit.
As for the Bush tax cuts, like the Reagan tax cuts, maybe it’s better to look at them for what they were – a loan. The kind you have to pass on to your children and grandchildren. Hope that $100 check was worth it!
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
5:02 pm
I agree with Bruno that it needs to be either single payer or a true free market system. I’d choose single payer. If you have any kind of illness above the level of the flu or something similar, you can rest assured your bill will be at least $5000 and probably twice that or more.
About a year or so ago, I read on the GA Department of Labor’s website that the average person in Georgia, who has been on their job for 10 years, makes about $15 an hour. If this person has been on the job that long, they are probably at least in their early 30’s, and may have a couple of kids. If they have employer provided insurance, they’ll probably be okay. If they don’t, they are going to be hurting because they aren’t going to be able to afford a policy for themselves and their family at that salary level.
And what about people who have already hit their lifetime limit on their insurance coverage? In most cases, no company will touch them (I personally know somebody in that position), so it’s find a job with insurance or play Russian Roulette.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
5:03 pm
Midori
February 24th, 2010
4:58 pm
Pulled away from the chili bowl, didya?
It’s really quite simple, Midori. If we don’t have the money to pay for it, then don’t pass a healthcare bill. Seriously, it’s quite simple. I taught this “economic philosophy” to my children.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
5:03 pm
Drew @ 4.59,
Very perspicacious post.
Zorro for the Common Good
February 24th, 2010
5:05 pm
Jay/Ragnar — in fact, the accusation that the Democrats plan to pass the entire health-care reform bill via reconciliation is also inaccurate. I agree that if they were to do so, it would be an inappropriate use of reconciliation (indeed, the Senate parliamentarian would almost certainly prevent them from even trying). However, Senate Democrats have ALREADY passed a bill; if the House passes the Senate bill via simple majority and Obama signs it, it will become law. Reconciliation is being proposed as a way to pass fixes to the bill, nearly all of which are budget-related (modifying the excise tax, removing the so-called “Cornhusker Kickback”, etc.) In short, the Democrats’ planned use of reconciliation is exactly what it was intended for.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:05 pm
I’m having a hard time figuring out what chili has to do with paying for healthcare.
Enlighten me.
Please.
M Percy
February 24th, 2010
5:05 pm
“It is politically popular to say that tax cuts benefit the wealthy,” said Michael D. Stroup, a Stephen F. Austin University economist who authored the NCPA report. “The accusation does not match the reality.”
The progressivity of the tax system can be measured in four ways: (1) the share of taxes paid by different income groups, (2) the share of income paid in taxes, (3) the change in taxes relative to the change in income over time, and (4) a comparison of inequality of income to the inequality of taxes over time.
Looking at the first three measures, the report found that:
* The top 1 percent of income earners pay more than one in every three dollars the IRS collects in taxes. From 1986 to 2004, the total share of the income tax burden paid by the top 1 percent of earners grew from 25.8 percent to 36.9 percent, while the total share of the tax burden paid by the bottom half of earners fell from 6.5 percent to only 3.3 percent.
* During the same period, the percentage of income the top 1 percent of tax filers paid in federal income taxes rose from 18.3 percent to 19.6 percent. By contrast, the percentage of income the bottom fifth of tax filers paid in federal income taxes dropped from 0.4 percent to zero.
* The income share of the top 1 percent rose 7.7 percentage points, from 11.3 percent to 19 percent, while their income tax burden rose even more, by 11 percentage points, from 26 percent to 37 percent.
41% of the US population will be outside the federal income tax system, essentially free-loading on on other half
* 43.4 million tax returns, representing 91 million individuals will have zero or negative tax liability (out of 136 million tax returns)
* 15 million more households file no tax returns at all
* this is by far the highest these numbers have ever been, as a percentage, going back to 1950 (when it was 28%)
* the “Bush tax cuts” caused this number to jump form 26% to 32% to 41%
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
5:06 pm
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
4:56 pm
Bottom line – I’d have rather had Hillary win in 2008 than Obama. He is SUCH a novice. When he leaves office, hopefully in Jan. 2013, he should try for a spot on “Celebrity Apprentice”. I would just love watching the Donald point to him and say “you’re fired”!
M Percy
February 24th, 2010
5:07 pm
The percentage of tax returns with no liability was fairly low in the 1960s and again in the early 1980s. A record had been set every year since 2002, as tax cuts throughout the Bush years, especially the refundable child tax credit, pushed low-to-middle income people off the tax rolls.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:08 pm
Percy,
how about a link to go with that data?
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
5:09 pm
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:05 pm
Rather than me enlighten you, why not read my post again. It’s simple, very clear, and very concise. It really is, I promise. But hey, I’ll make it easy for you. If we don’t have the money, don’t pass it. If you can’t understand that get back to work and ask one of your peers.
getalife
February 24th, 2010
5:09 pm
It shows spine and if they want to be hypocrites, show no shame like the gop.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
5:09 pm
Jimmy Carter,
“I’d have rather had Hillary win in 2008 than Obama”
Ditto.
M Percy
February 24th, 2010
5:10 pm
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/102.html
A wave of political “tax fairness” rhetoric in recent months has swept aside reasonable assessments of the Bush tax cuts. Tax cut critics have argued that the cuts have only helped the wealthiest Americans. However, 7.8 million low and middle-income families had their entire income tax liabilities erased by the cuts.
These changes affect families in different ways at different income levels. For example, raising the child credit amount has the biggest impact on families earning below $110,000 per year – the phase out level – while the marginal rate cuts are more beneficial to families with higher incomes. The marriage penalty changes are most beneficial for families earning up to about $75,000 per year.
For the median family with two children, earning $67,000 per year, the Bush plan would mean a tax cut of $1,133 this year, erasing 22% of their current tax liability. A family earning $40,000 will see 96% of their tax liability erased, while a family earning $200,000 will see just 9% of their tax liability erased.
The calculations below assume a working couple with two children. We also assume the standard deduction for families earning $40,000 to $75,000. For families earning $100,000 and above, we assume itemized deductions worth 20% of AGI.
Families earning below $35,000 are not included because the tax cuts enacted in 2001 effectively eliminated their entire income tax liability.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:11 pm
JC,
I already have a headache.
Thanks, but no thanks.
You couldn’t pay me to rehash that nonsense.
It is quite apparent, however, that you strongly lack focus.
otherwise, why would you keep invoking a conversation or conversations that I have with others months ago? A conversation that you were no part of, I might add.
hmmmmmmmm.
ADD…………..
getalife
February 24th, 2010
5:12 pm
“I’d have rather had Hillary win in 2008 than Obama”
Amen.
md
February 24th, 2010
5:12 pm
“if the House passes the Senate bill via simple majority and Obama signs it, it will become law.”
That is the big if. Pelosi doesn’t have the votes and may have even less after MA.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
5:12 pm
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
5:09 pm
You know, I think Ann Coulter was right. There was very little difference between Hillary Clinton and John McCain. I could have lived with either one, but I feel that I, and millions more Americans, will eventually get screwed by Obama.
As a footnote, I would love to have known who she would have picked as her VP.
jewcowboy
February 24th, 2010
5:13 pm
I have to run along. Play nice and have a good evening.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
5:14 pm
And that gets us to the second, more important point. The Breitbart site is lying. He is playing his audience for fools, and the sad part is that they don’t mind
If Bookman wasn’t smirking when he wrote that, thinking to himself of thousands of bald faced lies he tells each and every day, then he is mildly retarded, just sayin….
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:15 pm
The Tax Foundation is not a reliable source
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/the-tax-foundation-is-not-a-reliable-source/
hmmmmmmmm…………
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
5:15 pm
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:11 pm
You said “You couldn’t pay me to rehash that nonsense.” LOL!! All I said was if we don’t have the money to pay for it then don’t pass healthcare legislation. I can’t dumb it down any more for you.
@@
February 24th, 2010
5:15 pm
A conscious effort to deceive is unacceptable!!?!!
Yet here we all sit accepting, for decades, politicians who have put forth that effort.
From Richard Nixon’s “I am not a crook!” to Obama’s “I don’t really know that much about ACORN.”
Lying like a bad rug. Who’s that guy that just got out of prison? The one with the bad toupee?
Dewee is!!!Traficant to Run for Congress as an Independent
Changing his party name to protect the innocent! That ^^^ guy is a mixed bag. I kinda like him.
Midori
February 24th, 2010
5:15 pm
Later folks.
Need to prepare dinner……
M Percy
February 24th, 2010
5:17 pm
In 1980:
* the top 1% consisted of 932 thousand taxpayers who had AGI greater than $80,580
* they had a total of $138B in AGI, which comprised 8.4% of overall AGI
* they paid a total of $47B in taxes, which comprised 19.05% of the overall taxes
* their average effective tax rate was 34.47%
* per taxpayer, average revenue was $50,429
In 2006:
* the top 1% consisted of 1,357,192 taxpayers who had AGI greater than $388,806
* they had a total of $1,792B in AGI, which comprised 22.06% of overall AGI
* they paid a total of $408B in taxes, which comprised 39.89% of overall taxes
* their average effective tax rate was 22.79%
* per taxpayer, average revenue was $300,663
Even though the effective rate went down markedly, the amount of tax collected per taxpayer went up even more markedly, rising by a factor nearly six. And the share of taxes collected from this group more than doubled, although their share of income also went up 2.5x.
In 1980:
* the bottom 50% consisted of 46,619 thousand taxpayers who had positive AGI less than $12,936
* they had a total of $288B in AGI, which comprised 17.68% of overall AGI
* they paid a total of $18B in taxes, which comprised 7.05% of the overall taxes
* their average effective tax rate was 6.10%
* per taxpayer, average revenue was $386
In 2006:
* the bottom 50% consisted of 67,859,580 taxpayers who had postive AGI less than $31,987
* they had a total of $1,016B in AGI, which comprised 12.51% of overall AGI
* they paid a total of $31B in taxes, which comprised 2.99% of overall taxes
* their average effective tax rate was 3.01%
* per taxpayer, average revenue was $456
So their effective tax rate was cut in half, while their income went up 2.4x. Even though the effective rate went down markedly, the amount of tax collected per taxpayer not surprisingly did go up a bit (1.2x). However, the share of taxes collected from this group dropped quite a bit.
It is worth noting that the income figure for the lower 50% is the upper limit, while the figure for the top 1% is a lower limit. So comparisons of those numbers should keep that in mind. However, this fact must also be balanced with the recognition that a very large number of the bottom 50% actually had zero or even negative tax liability.
Also, consider that so many people are not paying any income taxes at all due to Bush tax cuts.
According to http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/542.html
One of the biggest obstacles facing President Bush’s Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform is the fact that America has become divided between a growing class of people who pay no income taxes and a shrinking class of people who are bearing the lion’s share of the burden.
Despite the charges of critics that the tax cuts enacted in 2001, 2003 and 2004 favored the “rich,” these cuts actually reduced the tax burden of low- and middle-income taxpayers and shifted the tax burden onto wealthier taxpayers. Tax Foundation economists estimate that for tax year 2004, a record 42.5 million Americans who filed a tax return (one-third of the 131 million returns filed last year) had no tax liability after they took advantage of their credits and deductions. Millions more paid next to nothing.
In 2004, a record 42.5 million tax returns – one-third of all returns filed – had no income tax liability because of the available credits and deductions in the tax code. This is a 42 percent increase in the number of zero-tax filers in just four years. In addition to these zero-tax filers are the 15 million individuals or households who do not earn enough to file a tax return. Overall, nearly 58 million taxable households are outside of the income tax system.
These findings raise serious questions about the future of the U.S. income tax system. Are any future tax cuts, or even tax reforms, possible when the lion’s share of the tax burden is increasingly borne by a shrinking pool of taxpayers who – at least on paper – appear to be “upper-income”? And will the expanding pool of non-payers demand even higher income taxes? These are questions lawmakers must begin to debate.
ty webb
February 24th, 2010
5:17 pm
“I’d have rather had Hillary win in 2008 than Obama”
Count me in as well. I’d much rather be accused of sexism than racism.
Jimmy Carter
February 24th, 2010
5:22 pm
ty webb
February 24th, 2010
5:17 pm
Ha!! Nice way to end the day.
ty webb
February 24th, 2010
5:23 pm
thanks jimmy.
jt
February 24th, 2010
5:23 pm
From Drudge—-
“Hoyer: Obama’s Health Care Tax Hikes Just ‘A Suggestion’… ”
That’s more like it boy.
And it is all over, but for the whining, for the rest of the Demo’s plans. Nukes or not.
It is morning in America.
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
5:26 pm
You all do understand that when you, say, have an increase in annual AGI from, say, $400 million to $500 million, that you actually should pay more in taxes. Unless of course Bush managed to get in another tax cut using reconciliation that I do not know about. If so, when did he set it to expire in order to pay for it down the road.
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
5:28 pm
So the Republicans were threatening to strip the minority of its historic right to filibuster by ignoring the equally historic requirement of a two-thirds majority to change Senate rules.
While we’re having this honest discussion let’s also clarify that they were only discussing this as it relates to advice and consent and the “nuclear option” didn’t change any rules, it just uses other rules already in place to bypass the rule change rule.
@@
February 24th, 2010
5:28 pm
It’s impossible to associate Obama with suggestions given his actions during 13+ months in office.
Weed my wips IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO ASSOCIATE OBAMA WITH SUGGESTIONS GIVEN HIS ACTIONS DURING 13+ MONTHS IN OFFICE!!!
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
5:31 pm
hillbilly @ 3:26
And that’s the truth…
JAY
“We all have honest differences of opinion. We all bring our own perspectives to the debate. We all think that we’re right and they’re wrong, whoever “we” and “they” may be. ”
In all due respect, I think you are being a tad cynical. I agree that we all bring our own perspectives, but I don’t agree that we all think we’re right and they’re wrong. There are issues on which we all have firm convictions, and there are those on which we have opinions, but they are not such that just because you disagree with me, it doesn’t make you wrong or me right. If we accept your contention, the we have ruled out the concept/possibility/potentiality of reaching compromise.
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
5:32 pm
And man oh man was that a great hockey game between the USA and the Swiss?
M Percy
February 24th, 2010
5:33 pm
Midori: I will admit that the TaxFoundation may be biased when quoting their commentary, as might be said also of the more liberal TaxPolicyCenter.org. However, I have often checked their raw data against the IRS sources referenced and found no discrepencies. Many of the numbers I provided above are my own calculations based on raw data.
You might consider TaxPolicyCenter.org’s table on those with negative or zero liability:
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?Docid=2487&DocTypeID=7
Tax Units with Zero or Negative Individual Income Tax
As percent of all tax units
2004 40.3
2005 39.1
2006 37.3
2007 37.9
2008 48.5
And similar data on how different income levels were affected by the Bush tax cuts:
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=536&topic2ID=40&topic3ID=43&DocTypeID=7
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
5:34 pm
“I’d have rather had Hillary win in 2008 than Obama”
I felt that way in 2008 because Obama was an unknown quantity.
I’d rather Hillary win in 2012 because now Ima Gonna is a known quantity.
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
5:36 pm
josef,
Maybe Michelle thinks Barry is going wrong too and the other night was the launch of M.Huckabe/M. Obama ticket.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
5:39 pm
RW–
Believe it or not, so long as they didn’t run GOP or DEM, I might be able to get behind it…
Dave R.
February 24th, 2010
5:41 pm
Drew @ 4:59: “No, because the Republicans don’t have a plan.”
Just because you don’t like it, doesn’t mean the plan does not exist. And you are lying though your teeth when you claim as such.
@@
February 24th, 2010
5:42 pm
josef:
Mike Huckabee!!?!! No way would I even vote for Mike Huckabee.
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
5:44 pm
Vote for me. Trust me. I won’t steer you wrong.
Drew
February 24th, 2010
5:45 pm
“Tax cut critics have argued that the cuts have only helped the wealthiest Americans. However, 7.8 million low and middle-income families had their entire income tax liabilities erased by the cuts.”
Nice strawman. The fact that Bush and the Republican Party threw crumbs at the rest of us doesn’t change the fact that the loaf went to the rich: per the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, even excluding the Paris Hilton tax cut, 60% of the Republican tax cuts went to the wealthiest 20% of America, with 25% going to the wealthiest 1%.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2116
As noted, you should think of that as a debt-financed loan to the richest Americans, which you and your children and your grandchildren will pay for.
I am absolutely fascinated by the obviously-not-rich conservatives in these threads: on the one hand, they are outraged about debt and whatnot, and on the other hand, they steadfastly demand that the government continue to loan money to the rich in the form of more and more tax cuts. Amazing!
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
5:46 pm
@@
You sound like me on Lieberman…mind if I ask why?
M Percy
February 24th, 2010
5:48 pm
This link is a terrific summary of raw data from the IRS. You can just look at the tables and ignore the preface commentary to remain “unbiased”. My spot checks of the data against the IRS sources tells me that data presented is the same as the IRS-provided raw data spreadsheets.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/250.html
Notice that they state that the top 1% paid 40.42% of of taxes in 2007.
TaxPolicyCenter.org presents virtually identical tables at
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=534
Although they present the data oddly, perhaps because you have to do the math in your head to see that the top 1% pay 40.42%, because they show what the bottom 99% paid (i.e., they show that the bottom 99% paid 59.58% of the taxes, which means that the top 1% paid 100-59.58% = 40.42%) in 2007.
Note the raw numbers match, and the numbers match the IRS data sourced.
Del
February 24th, 2010
5:49 pm
I think what’s undermining both our country and democracy is a narcissistic ideologically driven president who refuses to listen to the American people who by a majority don’t want governments take over of our health care.
AF
February 24th, 2010
5:50 pm
There is nothing in capitalism that says insurance should only be a hedge against catastrophic loss. That is the historical purpose for the existence of insurance, but capitalism only provides a market, not a rule.
IN fact, the growth and evolution of health insurance is a prime example of how capitalism works to create a product that is wanted: from a limited type of catastrophic insurance to a provider of health care. (I use the words “provider of health care” deliberately.)
In the ’50s and 60s that the detestible unions pushed for employers to provide health insurance for employees. Providing health insurance became normative as more and more union and non-union companies provided it. As time went on, all workers, union and nonunion, wanted more and more coverage and less and less cost. These were good years for the American economy so companies gave it to them.
Like magic, insurers got with employers and came up with products that gave more and more coverage. AFter the stupid government got in the game and created HMO’s, the insurers got the idea of cutting costs by negotiating rates with doctors and hospitals in exchange for sending business their way. Insurers put co-pays in their plans and replaced most of the co-insurance (you pay 20%, they pay 80%) with fixed dollar co-pays. Capitalism at work – the public demanded and the market responded.
Now, there are lots of reasons why this went crazy – none of which have to do with tort reform and will not be more that microscopically affected by tort reform. (I know you didn’t say anything about tort reform but I am trying to head of the stupid idea being put forward as some sort of solution.) But, if you want to blame anyone or anything for it all going crazy, looks like you will have to blame detestible unions (for starting it) and the stupid government for giving the market the ideas of HMOs. (A little blame also goes to globalization for killing the American golden calf.) After that, capitalism did its things and created what the market wanted.
That is it. The market did this. There were no federal regulations except for the period when HMO’s were created and then COBRA type stuff. What we have seen is capitalism at work. This is one of the freest, least regulated markets we have had, at least from a federal government viewpoint.
What went wrong? Nothing. The capitalist model allows for this disfunction to develop. We then go thru a period of dissolution. That is a messy time when the market really fails us because the old model is failing and the new model is still forming. Normal, but messy. If we were talking about the steel industry, we would be talking about jobs lost and mills closing, towns becoming almost ghost towns. Since we are talking about health insurance, we are talking about people going without health care, costs rising, jobs lost now as employers hire fewer workers in order to pay for insurance for the ones they already have, eventually jobs losses in the insurance industry. After a while, this could be several decades, something new will be created and become the “good”.
My theory on what is wrong is that consumers are estranged from the health care market. That is, the insurers negotiate rates and set up networks. The providers (hospitals, doctors, etc.) are clients of the insurers. The consumers (you, me, and millions of others) are also clients of the insurers. We don’t buy health care, we buy health insurance. Our purchasing decisions are based on premiums, co-pays, co-insurance, and out-of-pocket maximum. We don’t know or have to be concerned with what the doctor charges for a physical exam or what the hospital charges for ICU room use. We don’t pay them anything more than limied co-pays and co-insurance up until the out-of-pocket maximum is reached. Our health care use decisions are not based on the cost because we don’t pay it.
Now, before you think I think we should go back to the old capitalist market for a solution, I need to tell you I also think that health care needs to be a public good and not a market good. Like clean drinking water. But that is only my thought.
Pogo
February 24th, 2010
5:51 pm
Jay, the bottom line is, if the Democrats try this at this time for this particular issue, they are going to feel the repercussions for years to come. America does not like this so-called “Healthcare Reform” bill and for good reason. Use reconcilation at your own peril. I sometimes think that you can see the reality of what is going on but after offering up topics like this and seeing your stand on them, I see that you either blinded by your own political ideology or there is some other motive. Making excuses for bad things because of your political beliefs will not add to the discourse and it only serves to errode the possiblity of any solution. Maybe you just do it for the number of “hits”, eh Jay?
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
5:57 pm
How’s this for a conscious effort to deceive?
Drew
February 24th, 2010
5:59 pm
“Just because you don’t like it, doesn’t mean the plan does not exist. And you are lying though your teeth when you claim as such.”
I happily agree that Paul Ryan’s plan to gut Medicare exists, as surely as John Conyers’ Medicare For All plan exists. But Paul Ryan’s plan to gut Medicare isn’t the Republican plan simply because he’s a Republican any more than John Conyers’ Medicare for All plan is the Democratic plan simply because he’s a Democrat.
Now, if you could convince the Republican leadership to endorse Paul Ryan’s plan to gut Medicare, take that plan to the health care summit, and argue for it in the 2010 campaign, then I would happily agree that the Republican Party does have a plan.
Until then, it’s not a matter of whether I like Paul Ryan’s plan to gut Medicare. It’s a matter of whether even his Republican colleagues do. As of now, they don’t. They don’t like any plan: which is why it is the absolute truth to say that they simply don’t have one.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
6:03 pm
Josef & RW,
I cannot start swooning over Michelle Obama. People that swooned over Barach Obama now see what swooning can do for you. I still remember the first words that were publicized about her in reference to her feelings about the USA. Now she’s all polished up and speaking nice, Wonder why she did not do that while listening to Jeremiah Wright for 20 years?
I wish her success in other endeavors but I’d rather see her and her husband out of the White House. I see no improvement for this country under the Obama administration. The making of an astronomic debt continues without even slowing. That is incomprehensible..
Backwords
February 24th, 2010
6:04 pm
I think what’s undermining both our country and democracy are narcissistic ideologically-driven citizens who refuse to listen to any American who doesn’t think exactly what they think, and who by a stomping, shouting, insult-hurling vocal minority, don’t want government to fix a health care system that is not only broken, but shamefully broken.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
6:05 pm
RW writes:
“While we’re having this honest discussion let’s also clarify that they were only discussing this as it relates to advice and consent and the “nuclear option” didn’t change any rules, it just uses other rules already in place to bypass the rule change rule.”
I believe that is incorrect. The strategy was to get a ruling from the parliamentarian that the rules of the Senate don’t carry over from one session to the next, even though that had been the practice for the Senate’s entire history.
But once that ruling was made, it would no longer take two-thirds to change the filibuster rule, it would only take a majority. That’s how it would have been done.
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:05 pm
josef:
Why? You’re not gonna like my reasons. I find him a bit too complacent. He’s also a notorious tax-hiker in the form of fees.
He’s somewhat narcissistic in my opinion. Had he graciously bowed out in 2008, we could’a had a businessman in the WH, which is something we need desperately. A Mormon businessman.
SwamiDave
February 24th, 2010
6:06 pm
Argument -might- have validity -if- usage of reconciliation process itself is a violation of the intent of what it is intended to do. It is not intended to be a backdoor mechanism to gain passage of legislation (like heathcare reform) when a majority cannot get it through normal legislative means. Attempting to “ho-hum” something so blatantly against the intent of the process is as laughable mischaracterization as you are accusin Bretbart.
It is equally laughable to claim that is the opposition to these collectivist power-grabs are the ones creating an environment that is negative. Quit trying a takeover of 1/6 of American GDP wherein cost to most taxpayers will rise, quality will go down, and the culture of dependence will spread -THEN, we can address tone! Quit trying to ram through legislation via any means that has dwindling support from the majority of taxpayers, THEN we can discuss cooperation!
Until the, expect oppositionto stop this collectivist boondoggle perpetuated by thieving liberals who are trying with legislation what muggers do with guns!
-SD
mike
February 24th, 2010
6:11 pm
What? Bookman accusing conservatives of being immoral?
I don’t believe it. LOL
You know, I saw that suddenly a bunch of noise about this particular issue pop up on the internet and I pretty well guessed what the subject of Bookman’s blog would be, argument included. So tedious and so predictable.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
6:11 pm
Dusty…
Now, now…you’re taking me far too seriously on “ticket.” And, no, I’m not swooning and no, I haven’t forgotten the Richard Wright thingie, nor her comment on the first time being proud of her country. Nor have I forgotten Huckabee comments on gay rights, But, I do believe in giving credit where credit is due and they conducted themselves with respect and dignity and could reach a common cause above and beyond the political divide. Which is more than I can say for many of those who swoon over the one or the other.
Linda
February 24th, 2010
6:13 pm
When the health care debate started a year ago, 85% of Americans had health insurance & 95% of them were happy with their plans. The Dems created a crisis, an urgency, victims & bad guys. People were dying in the street with no health care. Insurance companies, whose profits are around 3% & rate # 30 or so in industry earnings, shouldn’t make a dime. Tort reform was off the table since trial lawyers are the number one contributor to Dems’ campaigns. Selling insurance across state lines in an attempt to make it more competitive isn’t acceptable. AARP received govt. money & sold out the elderly to support the bill. Doors were closed & locked. Senators were held hostage on Christmas Eve Eve until bribes were negotiated to halt Dem obstructionism. The “reform” will raise the fed. deficit as well as cost the states billions of dollars. The 2 bills cover about 4500 pages & create dozens of new govt. agencies & bureaus.
Americans attended Tea Parties & Town Hall meetings & emailed, called & wrote letters to express their concerns. Citizens were made fun of, insulted & otherwise ignored.
The president’s approval rating is in the forties. Congress has a rating of 10%. Only 23% of Americans favor the bill & the huge majority want Congress to start over.
Jay said above that liberals would risk re-election if the “purpose of politics is to help the country.” Liberals have shown us that they believe we are incapable of independent thought & present themselves as the solution. They are trying to reign in our freedom for some nebulous “greater good.” They decide what’s best for us. We’re to see their sense of compassion, decency & purpose.
This is between the American people/taxpayers/voters & the Dems/Liberals/Progressives.
I have no data to offer as proof, but I believe that, if the DC bunch crams a health care bill thru the Senate, regardless of the procedure, a bill that only 23% of Americans favor, by a mere 51% majority vote, that assures a take-over of our private health care, another 1/6 of our economy, as a preamble to total socialized medicine, which is the goal, it will be the first time & last time in American history for the use of soft tyranny.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
6:13 pm
Mike accusing me of being tedious and predictable.
I don’t know what to say about that.
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
6:14 pm
Jay B,
The way it works is that you call for a vote, in that case on a nominee. Then once there are 41 or more in opposition the majority leader raises the point of order that debate has gone on long enough and a vote must be taken within some timeframe in his point of order. The presiding officer, which would have been Cheney back then would sustain the point of order. A Democrat would surely then appeal. After that a Republican would move to table the appeal. The vote on tabling isn’t subject to a super majority vote so once the appeal was tabled cloture would be invoked. No rules change needed.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
6:15 pm
RW, do you have a source on that? Because that wasn’t my understanding of the nuclear option.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
6:16 pm
because if it was that easy the Dems could do it today.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
6:17 pm
@@
Actually, I have no problem with your reasoning. It conforms with what I would expect from you and your perspective, and, no, other posters, that was not meant to be sarcastic. I epected a reasoned response and I got one.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
6:19 pm
JAY
You better be nice to mike or I’ll throw out the touchy subject and have y’all agreeing again, to the shock and amazement of all about. See? I do serve a purpose in bringing the sides together…
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:27 pm
The only people bashing Paul Ryan’s medicare plan are liberals. He’s received plenty of support from Conservative pundits AND voters.
The second charge against the Roadmap (Ryan’s) is that “ends Medicare as we know it.” Yes, but only for Americans 55 or younger — these are the same people, in other words, who face a fiscal nightmare as entitlement spending surges in the coming decades and Medicare and Social Security become insolvent.
Watch Paul Ryan take on Tim Geithner
Impressive!
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
6:28 pm
Jay B,
Here’s a decent outline of the procedure.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
6:29 pm
“How would we handle the significant part of the population for whom a non-catastrophic loss — say $5,000 or $2,000 — is a lot more than they could afford? And would you make catastrophic insurance mandatory, and if so would you subsidize it for those unable to afford it?”
Jay– My basic premise is that if you eliminate the 55% of dollars that are wasted in our healthcare system, then finding sources of funding to “cover” everyone will be greatly simplified, whatever form that “coverage” takes. Obama and the Democrats have paid some lip service to lowering costs, but they seem afraid to take on the beast which causes the high prices in the first place–the third-party payment system.
http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/the-price-of-excess.jhtml
Personally, I’m not in favor of mandated health insurance, but would be a lot more open to such a mandate if it applied only to the catastrophic portion of the coverage. As for the poorest among us, free care is already provided via Medicaid. That will never change.
TGT
February 24th, 2010
6:29 pm
One man’s “standard procedure” is another man’s “nuclear option”:
“Republicans threatened to retaliate by rewriting Senate rules to permanently strip minority senators of the right to filibuster such nominations…So the Republicans were threatening to strip the minority of its historic right to filibuster.”
As Rush points out: “Fifty-one votes is all that had ever been necessary to confirm a judge nominated by the president. Fifty-one votes. …So in 2005 there was a question about how many senators were needed to give their “advice and consent” for a judge nominated by the president…there was a constitutional question about whether 51 or 60 senators were needed to confirm a president’s choice for the judiciary. It was about the appointments clause which reads thus: “The president … shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law.” That’s Article 2, Section 2, clause two. Conservatives said that 51 votes were enough if the advice-and-consent clause of the Constitution meant anything. Liberals said that the Senate’s filibuster rules superseded that…The nuclear option was using 51 votes instead of 60 because we’re talking here about something that’s standard: The confirmation of judges.”
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
6:32 pm
The good old days. Why I remember that back in my day we had to go through so many parliamentarians to get the rulings that we wanted that we just plain lost count. We’ll get back to those days again. Then we can set things right again.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
6:32 pm
Bruno–
How’s it going?
I bet I can get you and Jay to agree, at least that I’m full of sh*t…
Free, universal health care. Nothing less.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
6:33 pm
“Mike accusing me of being tedious and predictable.”
As I’ve said before, Jay, I wouldn’t like your job due to all the abuse you have to take from the keyboards of angry strangers. But you get your shots in too, however clever you make them.
I appreciate you taking time to spar with me today. Sometimes it seems you only respond to the obviously deranged right-wingers.
Drew
February 24th, 2010
6:35 pm
Linda, can you cite a source for even three of those assertions, or did you make every one of them up as you went along?
At the very least, the argument that “tort reform was off the table” is false; Obama specifically offered “reforming our medical malpractice laws” as a concession in his September speech in an effort to win Republican support. The Republicans didn’t take the offer. It’s rumored that he will make the offer again at the summit. I doubt they’ll take it now, either.
The argument that reform will raise the deficit is false; in fact, it reduces the deficit.
The rest is similarly false. Oh, and as for the popularity of the bill? Well, conservatives have done a good job of convincing the public that the packing is unattractive. Too bad for them that the content – the end to rescissions, the end to rejections based on pre-existing conditions, the subsidies to buy health insurance, the end to sex discrimination against and higher premiums charged to women, etc. – remains overwhelmingly popular.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
6:37 pm
“I bet I can get you and Jay to agree, at least that I’m full of sh*t…”
Not a tough chore, josef, since you already agree with the statement yourself. Which is one of the big reasons I like you so much–you don’t take yourself too seriously, and you realize that your views are simply that: the views of one particular person in a particular set of circumstances. All politics is local.
Not sure how my blog persona comes across, but I am a fairly modest, humble person in “real life”. That is until somewhat starts claiming that they are smarter than someone else (TaxPayer). That brings out my ugly side.
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:37 pm
I appreciate you taking time to spar with me today. Sometimes it seems you only respond to the obviously deranged right-wingers.
Thbbppptttt.
Come to think of it, jay rarely, if ever engages with the deranged left-wingers. Why is that, jay?
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:39 pm
…and Bruno! Pair-dohn if you view my “thbbppptttt” as deranged.
RW-(the original)
February 24th, 2010
6:43 pm
Oh goodie! I get to be deranged too! (ISH)
Drew
February 24th, 2010
6:43 pm
“The only people bashing Paul Ryan’s medicare plan are liberals. He’s received plenty of support from Conservative pundits AND voters.”
None of whom are the leadership of the Republican Party, and thus able to speak for the Republican Party. That said, maybe those conservative pundits and conservative voters should convince their conservative leaders – John Boehner and Mitch McConnell – to take Paul Ryan’s plan to gut Medicare to the summit, rather than arrive with nothing. I think it would be good for the Republican Party to be honest with the American people, tell them that the Republican plan is to gut Medicare, and let the American people decide whether they support that.
Because I think it would make for an interesting 2010 if the Republican Party were to tell the truth.
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:44 pm
Let’s look at these two statements, shall we, Bruno?
That is until somewhat starts claiming that they are smarter than someone else (TaxPayer). That brings out my ugly side.
I appreciate you taking time to spar with me today. Sometimes it seems you only respond to the obviously deranged right-wingers.
Flies in the face, don’t it?
F. Sinkwich
February 24th, 2010
6:45 pm
Minutiae.
Nuclear option or not, Americans are not going to stand for this Marxist piece of legislation.
Can anyone name one instance where the US Government mandates the purchase of a product of any kind under penalty of law? Just for the privilege of being a US citizen?
Didn’t think so.
If the Demos go through with this, it’s sharpen the pitchforks, fire up the tar, and pluck some chickens time!
Americans won’t put up with this travesty.
Fire Your Congressman and Senator in November
February 24th, 2010
6:45 pm
Abolish the tax code.
Flat Tax of 20%.
Balanced Budget Amendment.
Term Limits.
It’s a real start .
Fire every single one of those airheads in Washington, DC in November and start over !
md
February 24th, 2010
6:47 pm
“Oh goodie! I get to be deranged too! (ISH)”
Welcome to the club.
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:48 pm
RW:
According to Master Bruno, you, and likely I….fall somewhere within the “D range” on his grading scale.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
6:49 pm
@@
“Come to think of it, jay rarely, if ever engages with the deranged left-wingers. Why is that, jay?”
He sometimes engages me! ISH
BRUNO–
Thanks for agreeing I’m full of sh*t!
But there’s nothing galls me quite so much as somebody coming off, as that poster you mentioned, as if they’re smarter than someone else. The idea of prefacing what they’re saying with “in my opinion,” “the way I see it,” “from what I’ve read,” etc. is as alien as life on Tralfamador.
Folks take themselves far, far too seriously. And your statement that all politics is local is the very essence of Jeffersonian Democracy and the reason that I will stick to the liberal label in mine…
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
6:50 pm
Sometimes it seems you only respond to the obviously deranged right-wingers.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
6:50 pm
“I agree with Bruno that it needs to be either single payer or a true free market system. I’d choose single payer.”
HD–Your endorsement of my idea is a tremendous compliment. Your opinion means more to me than almost anyone else’s here, including my own sometimes.
“Free, universal health care. Nothing less.”
As a hard-core conservative, josef, I am far more open to your idea than the mandated coverage idea. If the goal is universal coverage, then socialized medicine is the way to go. BTW, I’m sure you already know, but your opinion means nothing to me, you Mississippi Rebel.
“I already said that overall costs are something that ALSO needs to be addressed, but yes, if it means – in the short run – perpetuating an inefficient system in order to get universal coverage, then that is what it takes.”
And this is where I once again feel motivated to challenge you, Doggone. Lowering the overall costs of health care is the only way to make it affordable again, whether you choose to pay for your care directly or use a third-party payment system. Obama and the Dems have done a great job at creating the illusion that mandated purchase of insurance = universal health care, but they are two entirely different beasts. If you want single-payer, then ask the Dems to create a bill to that effect and let Congress vote on it.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
6:51 pm
Fellow Derangees…is Jay really the Madhatter in mufti?
@@
February 24th, 2010
6:52 pm
josef:
Everybody (liberals) knows your a “D range” right-winger.
(ISH)
From the desk of Phil Gramm
February 24th, 2010
6:53 pm
No one asks for my opinion any more. Even my BFF, John McCain, no longer acknowledges, in public, that he relies on me for everything when it comes to economics. Go Dawgs.
Greece is sucking down the Euro ... Oh No !
February 24th, 2010
6:55 pm
Constitutional Amendment requiring a Balanced Federal Budget.
Hip, Hip, Hooray !
getalife
February 24th, 2010
6:56 pm
“Half of Afghanistan Taliban leadership arrested in Pakistan”.
Good news.
Greece is sucking down the Euro ... Oh No !
February 24th, 2010
6:58 pm
Try the Taliban at the Fulton County Courthouse! We have a stellar security record here in Atlanta !
Lauren Ashley
February 24th, 2010
7:01 pm
“The Bible says that marriage is between a man and a woman. In Leviticus it says, ‘If man lies with mankind as he would lie with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death and their blood shall be upon them.’ The Bible is pretty black and white…”
Oh yes and I will work for world peace if you select me.
Shamu's MMA Coach
February 24th, 2010
7:02 pm
“Feed me Khalid Sheik Mohammed”
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:02 pm
Bruno–it doesn’t surprise me at all…socialized medicine, in my opinion, is a pretty conservative concept. I have to come here to preach it, however, since Unmentionable tells me I need to take a cue from the Bruin and not bite the hand that feeds me!
And I agree with you on Hillbilly–he’s heads and shoulders above the rest of us. He would easily get Granddaddy’s ne plus ultra title of respect: A Southern gentleman of culture and breeding.
And, yep, I’m a true Mississippi Rebel child…!
@@
ISH!!!
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
7:03 pm
Looks like I stirred up a hornet’s nest with my “deranged” comment. Lot of guilty consciences on board tonight??
josef–Caught the Vonnegut reference. Loved all his novels as a teen, still remember all the plots from Player Piano through Breakfast of Champions. Two of my faves were God Bless You Mr. Rosewater and The Sirens of Titan. One of his most fascinating concepts to me, being the science geek I am, was the idea of ice-9, a form of water that crystallized at room temperature. In the end, one crystal of it unleashed destroyed the planet.
Jerry Garcia actually bought the movie rights to Sirens of Titan, but never got a finished product to the screen. Still laugh at Vonnegut’s cameo on Back to School.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
7:04 pm
Alright, gotta admit my dumbness. What are ISH , ISWH, etc?
Ragnar Danneskjöld
February 24th, 2010
7:05 pm
Dear Jay @ 4:37, I respectfully think you need to expand your vocabulary, if I read you correctly. I think you define “nuclear option” as “declaring immoral any filibuster blocking presidential nominees.” I agree that presidents – even mediocre ones I don’t like – should be allowed to choose their team. The conservatives branded their own abolition of non-policy filibusters as the “nuclear option” because they accurately perceived it have an adverse effect on the traditional comity of the Senate.
In contrast, you affirm that using a fiscal budget reconciliation tool to remake freedoms and rights of every person, the general powers of the states, and the economics of one-sixth of the country is not a nuclear option. Do you truly think the democrats’s proposed use of reconciliation for this purpose will have no adverse effect on comity? Speaking as your ideological opposite, I can assure you it is the nuclear option, whether you recognize it or not.
Frank McCourt
February 24th, 2010
7:05 pm
Actually, my wife and I are very happy to pay the taxes that we pay.
@@
February 24th, 2010
7:07 pm
What’s not to like about Hillbilly? He’s a man of few words that deserve heeding. Don’t have to come to the same conclusion, just heed.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
7:09 pm
Well, Josef, you sound as tired as I am. At least I think so. You let one interview win you over for Michelle and Huckabee? Now that’s too easy. You should have put up a fight!! Said her fingernails were too long orr his toupee too crooked. You know the sleight of hand….But I am ANGRY So there.
YES!!!! My hot water heater just went kabloom and tried for a tsunami. The plumber was nice but I soon found out that H W heaters are made of gold and diamonds these days. I mean I could use a whole stimulus package to replace this thing. Awww….but I signed up and now have hot water. The thought of cold water showers did me in. I surrendered (to HWH bankruptcy) and the plumber drove away in his Jaguar. Well, not really about the jag but the rest is, UNFORTUNATELY, true!!
So tomorrow I shall be bright, beautiful and throwing kisses. But tonight? Nawwww Now off to PBS NewsHour…
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:09 pm
Bruno–
Though it’s hard to pick a favorite, “Slaughterhouse 5″ had the most lasting impact, but the one that gets the most laughs around our house is “Slapstick.” “…I’m an old f*rt now with my memories…” “..gravity was light today…” and, Unmentionable’s predecessor was named Carlos, and didn’t treat me right, “…and Carlos was really a very stupid man…”
Ragnar Danneskjöld
February 24th, 2010
7:09 pm
And dear Jay, please note that I did not brand the errant argument you proffer “a lie.” I merely exposed the ignorance beneath it. Liars would use a different technique. Civilized people do not use that term to describe a difference of opinion, but only where there is a factual disproof. We urge you to meet the standard.
@@
February 24th, 2010
7:09 pm
Bruno:
Guilty conscience? Look elsewhere ’cause this girl don’t carry burdens. They’ll drag ‘ya down.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:13 pm
BRUNO
Since @@ has this irrational thing about smiley faces, and I do like her, I use the ISH (insert smile here)
DUSTY–
I’m just trying to be nice like Granny taught me! BTW our plumber DOES drive a nazimobile…and his name IS Joe…you’ve got my empathy…
Rightwing Troll
February 24th, 2010
7:15 pm
“Mike accusing me of being tedious and predictable.
I don’t know what to say about that.”
I’d say it takes one to know one…
“Oh good! Live sex acts on the hoods of cars on Peachtree Street again. Just some kids having fun. Nothing you wouldn’t have seen on Peachtree in the 40’s and 50’s right ?”
Nope it was happening in the back seats of cars back then.
Frank McCourt
February 24th, 2010
7:15 pm
Who was it that said, “Only little people pay taxes.” It’s true, you know.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
7:15 pm
I love it-
DIANNE FEINSTEIN MAY 18, 2005: The nuclear option, if successful, will turn the Senate into a body that could have its rules broken at any time by a majority of senators unhappy with any position taken by the minority. It begins with judicial nomination, next will be executive appointments, and then legislation.
Of course the dummycrats want to jump right to legislation.
Bookman, you’re a stooge.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
7:18 pm
Here’s another good one-
THEN-SENATOR JOE BIDEN MAY 23, 2005: I say to my friends on the Republican side: You may own the field right now, but you won’t own it forever, and I pray [to] God when the Democrats take back control we don’t make the kind of naked power grab you are doing.
Hairplugs prays to God?
eewwwww, right?
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
7:19 pm
“but the one that gets the most laughs around our house is “Slapstick.”
Wow. If you notice, my Vonnegut sequence ended at Breakfast of Champions, just short of Slapstick. I felt like he started losing his edge after BoC, kind of like an athlete who plays too long, or a musician that loses their creativity. So why is Slapstick the only Vonnegut novel in my bookcase today? Because a girl I had a crush on in 11th grade gave it to me as a birthday gift and wrote a very sweet inscription inside.
“Though it’s hard to pick a favorite, “Slaughterhouse 5″ had the most lasting impact”
One of the few cases in which the movie lived up well to the original work it was based upon. Schlachthof 5 oder Der Kinderkreuzzug. One of the reasons JG bought the rights to Sirens of Titan was to ensure that no one put out a crappy version.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:19 pm
“Bookman, you’re a stooge.”
Curley, Larry, Moe or Shemp?
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
7:21 pm
Thanks for the ISH explanation, josef. Here’s a new one for the JB blog: IMFH–Insert Middle Finger Here.
@@
February 24th, 2010
7:21 pm
josef:
It’s not irrational. Why would you say such a thing?
I have an issue with ‘em is all. A pet peeve if you will.
Little yellow fur balls, some animated. I’d like to shoot ‘em with a BB gun.
PING! Not irrational.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:25 pm
Bruno–
I couldn’t agree more on the film-book summation.
More on Vonnegut…
LIBERAL CRAP I NEVER WANT TO HEAR AGAIN
Give us this day our daily bread. Oh sure.
Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those wh trespass against us.
Nobody better trespass against me. I’ll tell you that.
Blessed are the meek.
Blessed are the merciful. You mean we can’t use torture?
Blessed are the peacemakers. Jane Fonda?
Love your enemies – Arabs?
Ye cannot serve God and Mammon. The hell I can’t! Look at the Reverand Pat Robertson. And He is as happy as a pig in s**t.
(video and more at the link above)
John Edwards Video Engineer
February 24th, 2010
7:27 pm
“The man on the tape, who they say is without a doubt John Edwards, is naked, performing sexual acts and is aware that he is being videotaped.”
This buffoon would have been a better POTUS than the guy than we elected in 2008.
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
7:27 pm
Confused By ‘Nuclear Option’ Spin, Right-Wingers Claim Obama And Biden Called Reconciliation A ‘Power Grab’
The made a mistake doing this the day before the health care summit. Now Obama can set the record straight tomorrow in front of the TV cameras.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/24/nuclear-option-reconciliation/
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:27 pm
@@
ISH!!!
BRUNO
IMFH? I LIKE that one!
Moderate Line
February 24th, 2010
7:28 pm
The effort to at least try to be honest in our discussion, even if our own bias means we come up short, ought to be the minimum required of responsible citizenship
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let me understand the argument Jay makes. He defends using a process reserved for passing budget bills by using an example of someone attaching a non-budget action to a budget bill which is somewhat dishonest.
The reconciliation was developed primarily for budget bills. Any action which is non-budgetary is dishonest. Parts of the health care bill could be legitimately considered budgetary. Parts not the whole thing.
Andrew Jackson ignored supreme court rulings because he could, does that make OK for future presidents to ignore them.
If it were to me I would go with a public option so you know I not making the argument to justify means for an end.
Democrats and liberal making such an argument are not really being honest with themselves. They had several months to pass a bill but failed.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/2/644.html
Yes, We Can
February 24th, 2010
7:29 pm
A $15-billion package is passed with the help of 13 Republicans. Now, other measures are in the works to boost hiring nationwide.
Hey! That’s one Republican for each of the thirteen colonies. Thirteen is our lucky number.
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
7:29 pm
Frank @ 7:15
That’s exactly why I think we should blow up (figuratively, not literally) the whole income tax system and start over.
Thanks to all for the kind words but now I got to find a bigger hat. (IW&SH)
And if all y’all get to be deranged, I want to be deranged, too. Do I get a secret decoder ring or anything?
Speaking of income tax, Kyle has a pretty interesting piece over on his side today.
Way back in the day, I saw “Slaughterhouse 5″. To tell the truth, I did’t much care for the movie but Valerie Perrine made quite an impression.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:34 pm
Hillbilly–
Well, maybe you can be an “honorary member.” He does engage you from time to time, but with unusual respect, I might add, but since you ARE what we said you were, that would qualify you as deranged in this day and age and in these parts…
Moderate Line
February 24th, 2010
7:34 pm
Would liberals really say health care is that much more important that it is worth risking the elections on?
If the purpose of politics is to get re-elected, then no.
If the purpose of politics is to help the country, then yes.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
When I see statement like these it scares me. Politicians are suppose to represent the people who voted for them. If policians believe the people are wrong then they should try to convince them the are right not ignore them.
Dictators don’t have to worry about elections. How often do we see dictators who don’t have to worry about what elections do what is good for the country. Elections are a regulator on politcians who are “claiming” to do what’s good for the country.
Frank McCourt
February 24th, 2010
7:35 pm
Dear Hillbilly Deluxe,
Thank you for your concern but I can assure you that I am quite content with the system exactly as it stands. So, do please refrain from any talk of dismantling a system that is functioning quite satisfactorily.
Thank you, kind sir.
This debate has gone off the cliff
February 24th, 2010
7:37 pm
Moderate Line @ 7:28 Brings up some very good points.
“Reconciliation” is to be used for matters pertaining ONLY to the federal budget.
I disagree with Moderate about the public option.
Both political parties use this BS loophole far too often.
Obamacare is way out of bounds for this tactic.
The plan was rejected… Fair and square. No matter how you spin it.
Move on Mr. Obama…..
We need jobs NOW !
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:38 pm
Hillbilly–
Of course you wouldn’t care for “Slaughterhouse 5…” You’re not sufficiently deranged to appreciate it! So, you were impressed with Montana Wildhack? You may just be Billy Pilgrim, after all…
Linda
February 24th, 2010
7:43 pm
Drew@6:35, Let’s not argue. Let’s see what transpires the next day or so. I stand by what I said.
The bill is not free. There’s that trillion dollars you need to address plus the billions the states do not have. Furthermore, the bill doesn’t reduce health care premiums or cost of care.
By your overestimating the conservatives (for the message) & underestimating the public (for not getting it right) proves the point I made. The American people got it & got it on their own. They’re not brainwashed, hogtied or covered in fleece.
The poll numbers I used were the very latest from Rasmussen, the most accurate in calling the last 15 mts. of elections.
DoggoneGA
February 24th, 2010
7:45 pm
“So, do please refrain from any talk of dismantling a system that is functioning quite satisfactorily”
But that is not YOUR decision to make. If you don’t want to participate, THAT is your decision…but you don’t get to control what is brought up for discussion. That is Jay’s choice.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
7:48 pm
“More on Vonnegut…”
LOL.
Here’s my all-time favorite Vonnegut quote:
“”Love is where you find it. I think it is foolish to go around looking for it, and I think it can be poisonous. I wish people who are conventionally supposed to love each other would say to each other, when they fight, ‘Please-a little less love, and a little more common decency.”
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
7:51 pm
I have a feeling President Obama is going to hold his own tomorrow vs. the Senate; he won’t get any republicant support but I think he’ll be the one who comes out looking like the man who should be president.
I don’t think he ever wanted to get in their faces, but he appears – to me at least – to be at that point.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
7:52 pm
yosef- This is the most absolutely disgusting and rancid Congress that we have ever had, in 230 some years of existence, when the are in session America suffers as never before, one most wonder what their true intentions really are and Bookman creates, out of whole clothe, propaganda on their behalf.
I apologize if I associated him with Moe, Larry and Curly.
I did not mean slander their good name like that.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
7:55 pm
Therefore, allow me to change my description of Bookman to toady, as in slimy thing sitting on a log croaking in harmony with his fellow amphibians, just sayin….
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
7:56 pm
“I think he’ll be the one who comes out looking like the man who should be president.”
Which, from my perspective, is Obama’s biggest handicap as a leader–he keeps confusing “style” with actual leadership. Like Bush or not, but he was a leader and he got things done. He even got all the Congressional Democrats to vote for the Patriot Act–twice. Obama can’t get his health care bill through even with a super-majority in both houses.
Still swooning at his “intelligence”, Jenifer?
I'm a Soul Man
February 24th, 2010
7:57 pm
It’s not voodoo if you do it too.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
7:59 pm
IR/YW
You’re on a roll tonight! But I disagree on this being the worst Congress ever…those back in the 1861-1890 period make this one look good….and the one in the late 1850s runs it a close second…this one is, at best, just third rate…also ran…just my opinion…
Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)
February 24th, 2010
8:00 pm
Well, I checked in one last time and couldn’t make heads or tails of some of the fussing here. So I’ll just say I’m with Swampy Dave and Raghead and Sister Dusty. That ought to about cover the Conservative line.
And if you just got to raise taxes, why don’t you pick out a person like this Jimmy Carter to pay a little more? I mean, he says he made so much money he retired early so he probly needs a bulldozer to pile it up. Just leave the rest of us alone.
I see where they went ahead and fired all those teachers in RI. Good. It’s the best thing to do with them. We spend way too much money on schools. All the kids need to learn is how to read a road sign and a drivers liscence manual and a little from the Bible. And maybe do enough figuring to make change for a buck at McDonalds. That ought to cut the school year down to, oh, I don’t know, maybe 20 days. No offense, josef. I know you’re probly a good teacher and all, but you put way too much know-how into those little kids heads. I know I never made it past 5th grade and I done alright.
Have a good night everybody.
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
8:02 pm
GOP Already Has Seven Reasons Why Health Care Summit Isn’t Legit
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/24/gop-already-has-seven-rea_n_475653.html
8. The room is not big enough for our supporters…(teabaqqers to scream and holler.)
9. The chairs don’t have any cushions on them. We need cushions if we’re going to sit for 6 hours…(never sat for an hour going over legislation.)
10. The lights are too bright for my orange tan…(Boehner)
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:02 pm
Soul Man–You just inspired the first musical offering tonight–and just in a nick of time! Looks like the blog is fixing to get ugly again after a brief respite:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye9YWE5LCXw&feature=related
Dick Cheney
February 24th, 2010
8:02 pm
Bush is an idiot. He just plain refused to clear my dear friend, Scooter’s, good name for me. It’s not like I ever asked for anything for myself. It’s torture, I say.
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
8:03 pm
Josef
My taste in movies is different than the average person, I guess, and I see very few. Way back when I went to see “2001″, just to see what all the fuss was about. It bored me to tears and I left at intermission. A lot of people like it though; more power to ‘em.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:03 pm
Bruno
As for Ima Gonna, when he took off on that Rainbow Tour during the campaign, I said we were in for a cheap and tacky remake of Evita…and since you know Spanish, you’ll catch the double entendre, but “…evita a Obamita…”
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:04 pm
Catch you all in a short while–got my mambo on now.
@@
February 24th, 2010
8:05 pm
IR/YW:
Your 7:52 and 7:55 take me back to the days when, for a brief time, you signed each post with “Love, Andy”.
I’m laughing just thinking about it.
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
8:05 pm
I saw Convert’s comment earlier today about changing to the Holiness Church, so he could drink. Never really been to a Holiness Church, have ya?
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:06 pm
yosef- My critique of the current Congress does not hinge on some narrowly defined grievance, after all, America survived and prospered after 1861 or whatever year you happen to despise.
After these current criminals are finished with us, I’m not so sure about that survival thing.
These $#^@**&^ couldn’t care less about our future.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:08 pm
This obozo is no better than the street level crack dealer that passes out free drugs to get his future customers addicted to them.
I am the man.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:10 pm
Redneck– heh, heh!
Hillbilly–
The best way “to see” “2001″ is to buy the soundtrack. I’m not a big sci-fi fan myself. A real bone of contention in this house…
Log croaking amphibians…? Well, last night was turtle soup, frog legs anyone?
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
8:11 pm
America survived and prospered after 1861
I’d respectfully disagree. 2/3 of it did but the other 1/3 didn’t.
Moderate Line
February 24th, 2010
8:11 pm
“Using reconciliation to ram through complicated, far-reaching legislation is an abuse of the budget process. The writers of the Budget Act, and I am one, never intended for its reconciliation’s expedited procedures to be used this way. These procedures were narrowly tailored for deficit reduction. They were never intended to be used to pass tax cuts, or to create new Federal regimes. Additionally, reconciliation measures must comply with Section 313 of the Budget Act, known as the Byrd Rule, which means that whatever health legislation is reported from the Finance Committee or legislation from any other Committee that is shoe-horned into reconciliation will sunset after five years. Additionally, numerous other non-budgetary provisions of any such legislation will have to be omitted under reconciliation. This is a very messy way to achieve a goal like health care reform, and one that will make crafting the legislation more difficult.”
“Whatever abuses of the budget reconciliation process which have occurred in the past, or however many times the process has been twisted to achieve partisan ends does not justify the egregious violation done to the Senate’s Constitutional purpose. The Senate has a unique institutional role.”
Senator Robert Byrd
http://byrd.senate.gov/speeches/view_article.cfm?ID=366
Who is being dishonest in this arguement?
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:11 pm
HD–Ditto for me when I saw Star Wars. It is the only movie I ever fell asleep to.
FrankLeeDarling
February 24th, 2010
8:16 pm
hey everybody Andy knows where to get free drugs!!!
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:20 pm
Most overrated movie of all time: Titanic. I would have fallen asleep if not for a hot date beside me.
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
8:20 pm
Ex-Officer Pleads Guilty In Katrina Killing Probe
After all this time, I never thought the day would come.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100225/ap_on_re_us/us_katrina_bridge_shooting
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:22 pm
Narrowly defined grievances, Hillbilly, I thought I made myself perfectly clear on the minimalistic qualities associated with whines such as yours.
Allow me to put this as succinctly as I possibly can, people don’t swim to Mexico to earn a better living, just sayin….
We used to live in the greatest country on Earth, before the same people who want to magnify their little minuscule “problems” to give greater meaning to their empty, pitiful lives, became hellbent on destroying the best thing that has ever happened to them.
Collective stupidity where there once was collective brilliance.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:23 pm
BRUNO and HD
I may be the only person in Western Civilization who’s never seen Star Wars, ditto the Star Trek ones…had to be pulled kicking and screaming to “Babylon 5,” but became a fan in short order…those were some highly educated producers, directors, writers and actors…
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
8:26 pm
IR
People here were no better off in 1920 than they were in 1870. You want to call that whining, knock yourself out, big boy.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:28 pm
FrankLee—
Where? Where?
Bruno–
“Titanic” is another one I’ve never seen…
TW
February 24th, 2010
8:28 pm
Wasn’t breitbart the commandant behind that o’keefe nazi who broke into Landrieu’s office?
Yeah, real POS you’ve decided to throw some pub at today, Jay…
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:29 pm
I love the notion that people would put their petty, miserable little problems of every day life ahead of the survival of the entire country, it is so….comforting.
Why people still want to die for this train wreck…..I’ll never know.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:30 pm
Great attitude, Hillbilly, what, should we all come over and fluff your pillow?
FrankLeeDarling
February 24th, 2010
8:30 pm
“Collective stupidity where there once was collective brilliance.”
damn for once I agree,just a difference on how we got here
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:31 pm
Hillbilly–
1920? Try 2010. I’m not real impressed with what 150 years of colonial-imperialism have brought us. In 1860 Adams County, Mississippi was the wealthiest county in the country, now it’s one of the 100 poorest. Where did that money go? It certainly didn’t go to the “freed” men, now did it?
Jenifer
February 24th, 2010
8:32 pm
Lindsey Graham Is Mad That Harry Reid Said The GOP Should “Stop Crying” About Reconciliation
Somehow I just figured Miss Lindsey knows a lot about crying.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/lindsey-graham-mad-harry-reid-said-gop-sho
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:32 pm
I can understand your avoidance of the Star trek movies, although ST IV was great. Kirk and the crew travel back in time to attempt communication with some humpback whales in San Francisco. Nimoy’s attempts to pass himself as a hippie were worth the whole price of admission. Dr. McCoy has to save one of the crew members from a craniotomy after he suffered a brain injury. Pushing the medical people aside, he applied a device to the member’s head which repaired the internal hemmorage, then shouted at the surgeons “You were about to drill a hole in this man’s head??? Barbarians!!!”
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
8:32 pm
Great attitude, Hillbilly, what, should we all come over and fluff your pillow?
So you’ve just been reincarnated as Emily Post?
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:38 pm
Frankie- Doctors used to think it was a brilliant idea to attach leeches to their patients and now we have dummycrats in Congress doing the exact same thing, for some reason, I do not think you and I are on the same page, and I’d appreciate you not insinuating such things.
Thank you very much.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:39 pm
Like I said, josef, I smelled ugliness in the air, and it has reared its head.
Reporter–My Little League coach gave us some good advice one time. Describing a fight his brother had been in earlier in the day, he said “Boys, on the ground with a hillbilly’s boot on top of your head is no place to be.”
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:43 pm
BRUNO
A hiillbilly code of honor maxim: Be slow to wrath and quick to vengeance…
FrankLeeDarling
February 24th, 2010
8:43 pm
josef ,if you could tolerate babylon 5 you should check out star trek deep space nine.
I love me some vonnegut but I think William Gibson is the shiz nit
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:45 pm
Hillbilly–
I suspect that IR/YW is a Carpetbagger who gives the good immigrants a bad name…just sayin…
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
8:48 pm
FrankLee
Unmentionable keeps telling me that…
BTW–leeches are still used in medicine…to control gangrene…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:49 pm
Just to razz you, jo, I thought about dedicating “Mississippi Queen” by the group Mountain to you, but came up with this instead for you and HD. Too bad our fourth member, AmVet, is scarce these days……
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pwbowi-8Yoo
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
8:50 pm
Nice one, Bruno. According to an interview I heard with Gregg once, that was Duane’s favorite song.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:54 pm
Bruno- My Little League coach showed me his .45 Colt, just sayin….
For some reason people didn’t want to put a boot on his head.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:55 pm
And here’s one by Kris Kristofferson that always cuts deep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=parlZcc4vp4
Beggar standin’ on the corner sing your song, sing it for a dime…..
FrankLeeDarling
February 24th, 2010
8:55 pm
really? leeches is there nothing better?
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:55 pm
yosef- I know good immigrants. You, sir, are not a good immigrant, just sayin…
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
8:56 pm
Frankie- I shot way over your head, dude, be thankful, man.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
8:57 pm
LOL, Reporter.
FrankLee–Ultimately, nature’s way is usually the best. Leeches can clean an infected area better than any scalpel.
FrankLeeDarling
February 24th, 2010
9:03 pm
Andy your virility is all in YOUR head
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
9:03 pm
Hey Bruno @ 7:56
Glad to see some clear vision here. You posted:”Obama_____keeps confusing ’style’ with actual leadership. Like Bush or not, but he was a leader and he got things done. He even got all the Congressional Democrats to vote for the Patriot Act–twice. Obama can’t get his health care bill through even with a super majority in both houses.”
I like your impartial observations. Keep going!
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:04 pm
“Bruno- My Little League coach showed me his .45 Colt, just sayin….”
Reminds me of a time in Jersey when one of the local guys thought he would be impressive and pulled a shotgun out on some Warlocks in a bar one night. They didn’t flinch and calmly finished their beers. Let’s just say it didn’t work out very well for him later on….
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:07 pm
IR/YW
Nope, not an immigrant. Born, bred and raised here in Uncle Sam’s Oldest Colony (that’s Alan Tate in case you want to know who called it that)…
BRUNO–
Mississippi Queen was one of my nicknames back in college Up North…my friend, D, from Yazoo City was called the Delta Queen…
And thanks, that’s one of my favorites of theirs…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:11 pm
When I pumped gas, the Warlocks would occasionally stop in to tank up. They would line up nicely and hand off the pump to one another. Then they would politely pay their bill and ride on.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:15 pm
Hillbilly (and you, too, Bruno)
I’ve been meaning to ask…Are you familiar with Marshall Chapman’s first album, 1977, “Me I’m Feelin Free?”
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:16 pm
“I like your impartial observations. Keep going!”
Nothing original in those statements, Dusty. I doubt if any of the Libs here would label me as impartial, although I do try to keep my rants fairly reasonable.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
9:18 pm
Bruno- My bad for not educating you on the true meaning of the .45 Colt story, when the Warlocks see the barrel of my favorite sidearm, they’re done dealin, just sayin….
You don’t see it until it is too late.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:20 pm
Alright, let me posture a little for Reporter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JybkqBGrVs
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:21 pm
Bruno–
“I doubt if any of the Libs here would label me as impartial, although I do try to keep my rants fairly reasonable.”
I won’t presuppose to speak for the others, but I find you refereshingly impartial and, to the best of my recollection, I’ve never known you to go off on a rant…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:23 pm
“I’ve never known you to go off on a rant…”
Thank God you didn’t know me from the old W2W blog. I literally had people threatening to come to my house.
FrankLeeDarling
February 24th, 2010
9:24 pm
can deception be anything but a conscious effort?
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:26 pm
The rage-o-meter has dialed back, fortunately. Although I did try to wave a guy over on 285 on Monday. He wouldn’t stop.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
9:29 pm
I shouldn’t say that, I was at the Greyhound bus station in downtown Chicago picking up a friend and there was this homeboy, dressed like a pimp, yelling at his homegirl, in the funniest way, well, at least I thought it was funny. He didn’t. Didn’t much like the way I was laughing at him either. I guess he decided he was going to express his displeasure with me first hand, started walking over and asking me what my problem was. I told him that I didn’t have a problem but that he did and then put my pretty little .380 auto up on the dashboard where he could see it.
Homey went back to yelling at his ho, just sayin…
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:30 pm
BRUNO
“…Although I did try to wave a guy over on 285 on Monday. He wouldn’t stop.”
As you know, I don’t drive. Unmentionabled says I ride shotgun. Literally!
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:30 pm
The Chicago homeys wouldn’t stand a chance in Camden. Just sayin’.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:31 pm
IR/YW
Picking up a friend at the Greyhound station, eh? Hmmmm, just’ sayin’
Scout
February 24th, 2010
9:32 pm
Headline CBS: “Pedophile Pediatricians Remain in Shadows”
Ah, excuse me but are they getting ready to come out of the closet ………. like some of our other friends?
Are they going to serve their country as Army doctors (as long as they only treat anyone over 18)?
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:32 pm
Bruno?
Camden? Zat where you from? I know I ain’t gonna mess with you and that’s for d*mn sure!
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
9:33 pm
Josef
I have seen Marshall Chapman on TV some but not really familiar with that album.
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
9:36 pm
Speaking of bus rides….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpNOoq0kFds
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:36 pm
“Picking up a friend at the Greyhound station, eh? Hmmmm, just’ sayin’”
And his favorite rock band is called AC/DC. Just sayin’
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
9:36 pm
Well, let me put in a good word for IR/YW , not that he needs any help from me.
I find that he cares deeply about this country and is much concerned about it. He expresses it in the strongest words possible. There is no lightness in his care for this country and does not like it in others.
I am not in the “strong words” category myself. That language is not my forte. But I share his concern for this country and understand where it comes from.
kayaker 71
February 24th, 2010
9:36 pm
Conscious effort to deceive….. what words from a liberal trying to dodge the reality that his heros are hypocrites. Just like the sound bites of all of the Democrats on WMDs. Nearly everyone of them said that Saddam Hussein represented the greatest threat to the security of America and that we should protect America’s security by bringing his reign to an end. John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Charles Shumer…… numerous others stated that the fear from the Saddam threat was unacceptable to our security and that, by unanimous vote, we should enter Iraq and eliminate the threat. Then, when no WMDs were found, they jumped ship like rats in a flood and gave W the most intense criticism of his presidency. Trying to have it both ways…… trying to look good to the electorate……. making at attempt at credibility. All failures. And we have it on tape. You can’t wiggle out of this one, Bookman.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
9:37 pm
Josef writes:
In 1860 Adams County, Mississippi was the wealthiest county in the country, now it’s one of the 100 poorest. Where did that money go? It certainly didn’t go to the “freed” men, now did it?
Actually, yes it did. A great deal of that pre-war wealth was in the form of slaves; that wealth disappeared upon their emancipation. A lot of the remaining wealth was in the additional value those slaves gave to the property that they worked. So the pre-war value of the land was diminished post-war as well.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 24th, 2010
9:37 pm
yosef- Not all people who use Greyhound are queer, just sayin.. And most of them don’t throw a fit in public about their situation either, like you libs do. It was a relative that I was giving a job to, 20 years ago.
Bruno- You may want to check the statistics, obozo’s Chicago is like the murder capital of the world. I often wonder how many I could have prevented by letting the situation escalate, if you know what I mean.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
9:41 pm
Kayaker, you’re right about a lot of those Democrats. Some of them knew better, or should have known better, but caved to public opinion. In Hillary’s case, she paid a heavy price for it too. Had she voted against the war, she’d probably be president today.
Dat’s da breaks.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:46 pm
Hillbilly–
The cut on it, “Somewhere South of Macon” speaks to that Yankee capitalist colonial imperialism in much the same fashion as the Grady commentary you linked me to, only in the country metier…
This is a not very good cover of it…but nowhere near what Marshall Chapman does with it…you just gotta be from a mill town to understand the “soul” Chapman puts in it…but it’s the only one I have been able to find…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_fXquOcD50
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:46 pm
Looks like Jay shifted his attention back to the deranged @ 9:37.
“You may want to check the statistics, obozo’s Chicago is like the murder capital of the world.”
From Wiki:
“In 2009, Camden had the highest crime rate in the U.S. with 2,333 violent crimes per 100,000 people while the national average was 455 per 100,000 “
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:51 pm
JAY–
And the INSURED VALUE of that property was, according to Judah Benjamin’s farewell address to ther US Senate, $1.000,000,000 in 1861 dollars…where did THAT wealth go? Like SoCo and I keep saying, when Aetna backs it’s crocodile tears with a little coin of the realm, their apologies might carry a little more weight…
Jack
February 24th, 2010
9:51 pm
A conscious effort at self deception is an everyday occurance in the liberal camp.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:51 pm
HD–Enjoying the Greg Allman selection.
If I knew more about computers, I would fix it so my posts would be highlighted just like Jay’s. That would blow him out of the water. Since he’s got grey, I guess I’ll have to take blue, to represent the victors of the War of Southern Stupidity. (ducking Hillbilly’s flying boot)
Actually, the part of Jersey I’m from is technically south of the Mason-Dixon Line, so y’all have been wrongly maligning me here.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:51 pm
Oh, Jay, too bad I didn’t bet today! I would have won…
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
9:55 pm
BRUNO
Watch your step or we’ll take back your landed immigrant status!
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
9:57 pm
Bruno
I only passed thru NJ once on a train and it was dark. I don’t judge a place on a pass through. I’ve known a few Jerseyites (correct?), some I liked, some I couldn’t stand, about like most other places.
And speaking of Jay’s shading, wouuldn’t it be great if we could put posters on ignore or highlight them someway? Might cut down on the rigamarole.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
9:59 pm
Well, Jay, I have a little higher opinion of Democrats than you do. After 9/11 it was quite obvious that there was a threat to the USA. Any disaster like that stirred the heart of every American. Democrats were no different at that time. They cared about this country. All of them believed the CIA reports and the UK reports. They fought back.
Now, you won’t even give them that credit. Perhaps you have never felt what the majority felt and deny that it is there. Or either, like other Democrats, you dismissed the threat and turned on Bush, even though he had warned that it was easy to slip away from being strong. He was right.
Hillary’s loss had nothing to do with voting against aggresion. She has never been a popular figure but is beginning to look better. I don’t think she would like your opinion. Why should any Democrat like your opinion about their patriotic vote to keep our country safe?
Jay
February 24th, 2010
9:59 pm
Gotta keep ‘em guessing at least a little, Josef.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:01 pm
Can we say ignominy here?
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:01 pm
JAY
By that one billion, I mean slave property…and further, the “freed” men did not benefit. No land reform, no indemnity, nada, nic, nothing…and the “liberators” had it within their power and did nothing, Then with Plessy v Ferguson the Supreme Court sold them right back down the river with the only justice voting contra being Justice Harlan, himself born into a slave-owning family. Sorry, but, the way I see it, you can’t whitewash this into anything but an exercise in hypocracy…are you willing, ready and able to bring on the issue of restitution? I am and I’m for it.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:02 pm
I guess for a history buff, the Philadelphia area and even South Jersey should be a treasure trove. One time I did go see a place called Pea Patch Island, which was a Northern Prison during the Civil War off the coast of Delaware. If I recall correctly, it didn’t have a good reputation, but don’t know if it raised to the level of Andersonville in ignominy.
Jay
February 24th, 2010
10:03 pm
Dusty, it was obvious even then that for all his evil, Saddam was no threat to us and certainly no threat to give WMD to Islamic extremists whom he had fought his entire career.
9/11 was the excuse to invade Iraq; it was never the reason. And if you were paying attention, there was ample cause to know that.
Finally, Hillary lost the Dem nomination because of that vote. And i bet she knows that.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:05 pm
JAY
Keep ‘em guessing about? I’m not following that…no sarcasm intended…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:06 pm
Jay–If you can un-moderate my 10:01, I would appreciate it, I can’t figure out the trigger word.
“9/11 was the excuse to invade Iraq; it was never the reason. And if you were paying attention, there was ample cause to know that.”
Not entirely, Jay. As I like to think, invading Afghanistan was a specific response to 9/11, invading Iraq was more of a general response. Kind of like picking a kid out of a line and whipping him so the others see and take notice.
getalife
February 24th, 2010
10:07 pm
“Had she voted against the war, she’d probably be president today.”
Her State was attacked and we had unity.
Of course she voted yes.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:09 pm
“Finally, Hillary lost the Dem nomination because of that vote. And i bet she knows that.”
From the outside looking in, I’m not sure if it was that simple. I think a lot of voters may have been turned off by the baggage that Hillary carried. For all of the friends the Clintons made, they made a lot of enemies as well. Obama represented a fresh face and a new start for people, despite his lack of solid credentials.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:09 pm
The Hillary vote…I agree with Jay on that…it cost her and it should not have. She made it clear that given the information she had at the time, she’d do it again…got my attention as an honest approach. I also kinda liked it when she came in late to the press conferance and begged excuse since she had been pinned down by gunfire…a sense of self-irony…we could use more like that…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:11 pm
I couldn’t get it through the moderator, josef, but tried to mention that I went to Pea Patch Island as a teen. It was used as a prison for Confederate soldiers.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
10:16 pm
Well, Jay, seems you knew more than the CIA, British Intel, all the info that the President and the Congress saw about 9/11. Too bad you did not go to Washington and explain that 9/11 was just a prank, that Saddam Hussein was a nice guy without wmds, that the Kurds were not really gasssed, that there were no terrorists even thinking about Iraq, and that YOU THINK that the USA just wanted oil. I’m sure they would be just as impressed at your knowledge as I am. Now why didn’t you tell those poor ignorant people in Washington about your vast pool of knowledge??
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:19 pm
Bruno and Hillibilly
My great-grandfather, a lowly private in the CSA, was held pow at Ft. Delaware, taken while Grant’s General Order #11 was in effect…ate rats to survive…wouldn’t sign any loyalty oath and was finally in July 1865 dumped on the Delaware shore and told to begone…he wasn’t real fond of Jersey, but I’ve had some good times there…northwest Jersey is one of the most beautiful spots in the country and they gave us Springsteen…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:19 pm
Getting late–Here’s a tune we can all learn from. I think Jay might even like this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM1y-aZ4UpI
“Fear, fear, she’s the mother of violence”
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:20 pm
DUSTY–
Who the h*ll are the Kurds?
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:23 pm
Fort Delaware was on Pea Patch Island, so I may have stood in one of the actual cells your relative was held in. Not a pleasant place, as you can imagine. In my earlier post i compared it with Andersonville, but didn’t think it rose to the same level of ignominy.
Scout
February 24th, 2010
10:27 pm
I read today where the Navy is officially allowing women to serve on submarines. They will be called “submarienettes”.
I guess this will give new meaning to “up periscope” or “dive, dive” depending on their persuasion.
kayaker 71
February 24th, 2010
10:29 pm
It is apparent that most all politicians would pilfer the gold in their mother’s teeth for the sake of image. Many times in the past, as Harry Reid pointed out, the nuclear option was threatened and criticized by all of those on the opposite side of the aisle. The Democrats came out hot and heavy in the sound bites that Bookman posted and tried to make them look like unfair, dishonest uncaring fools. Then when the Democrats threaten to use the same tactic to pass their beloved health care leglislation, the shoe is on the other foot and now the Democrats are the party which is going to bring down the bicameral system and defy all those things that the founding fathers thought was so sacred. I don’t trust any of them to tell the truth, no matter what party. It is obvious by the new CBS political poll on Bozo that most of America doesn’t trust them,either.
Drew
February 24th, 2010
10:30 pm
“I stand by what I said. The bill is not free. There’s that trillion dollars you need to address plus the billions the states do not have. Furthermore, the bill doesn’t reduce health care premiums or cost of care.”
Linda, I know this may be difficult for you to comprehend, given the conservative tendency to eat candy now and pay for it later, but the bill raises the revenue necessary to cover its expenditures. Subsidies will, in fact, reduce how much working Americans will have to pay for insurance, and slow the growth of health care costs – exactly as it is intended to do.
That said, it is so very, very precious to hear conservative Republicans, who think nothing of spending hundreds of billions every year on wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and had they their way, Iran and North Korea, are so very, very concerned about spending 90 billion a year to ensure every American has health insurance. I suppose they prefer a dead Iraqi to a living American.
“The poll numbers I used were the very latest from Rasmussen”
No, they weren’t.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform
You claimed that 23% supported the bill; in fact, it’s 41%. And like I said, while the Republicans have done well rendering the bill unpopular, the elements of the bill itself are popular. Since you like Rasmussen – and what conservative wouldn’t, given its ridiculously Republican lean – you should take his word for it:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/december_2009/what_voters_like_about_the_health_care_plan
78% support the exchange, 74% support the ban on rejection for pre-existing conditions, and 57% support the subsidies.
I suggest you start providing links when you offer statistics; otherwise, you should admit you’re writing fiction.
Mick
February 24th, 2010
10:31 pm
All the people who dislike the current president seem to forget that the previous president lost the popular vote to al gore and ruled like he had a super majority. They pushed through everything they wanted and didn’t give a damn about the minority. Reconciliation was used twice for tax cuts. No matter who followed, they were destined to be screwed because of the dung heap left at the doorstep of the white house. Now, people want to attach the whole famdam thing to this president and erase all the actions of the previous. Health care is a tough issue but please get us all some relief, and stop this nuclear bs smokescreen, it just goes on and on…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:33 pm
AmVet–Wherever you are tonight, this one’s for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjkcICbtYOU
“Tiny demons, inside me….”
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
10:36 pm
You know them Kurds, Josef. ‘Member them pictures of all those folks lying on the ground dead as doornails. I mean ever’body, women & children, gassed in a whole village! Yeah, them Kurds!
By the way, Josef, my great grandpa fought just as hard as your great granpa. He also fought TB. After sleeping outside for two years while fighting for the Confederacy, he recovered. Thank goodnes, he didn’t get to New Jersey.. That’s enough to kill anybody.
Mick
February 24th, 2010
10:37 pm
**Thank goodnes, he didn’t get to New Jersey.. That’s enough to kill anybody**
Hey, I’m from Jersey! They don’t call it the garden state for nothing..
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:39 pm
Bruno–
Actually the death rates at Ft. Delaware (and several other) Yankee pow camps from malnutrition and acts of reprisals and violence were higher than Andersonville–brought out first in the congressional hearings of the 1880s. What made it all the more an act of ignomy was that there was not the lack of resources found around Andersonville…an interesting read…
http://roughton-maas.com/immortal_600.htm
BTW did you see the History Channel’s program on Camp Douglass? Another of my ancestors, a 65 year old judge, was taken there under Order # 11, died and his body, we believe, thrown into the lake…
You may well have stood there. I’ve been and it’s the eeriest feeling…hard to describe…I felt much the same when I went to the spot he was taken pow…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:42 pm
For being one of the smallest states, New Jersey kicks butt in several industries all the way from agriculture to chemical production.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
10:44 pm
Scout,
I hope you are not a Girl Scout. They don’t give badges for the subjects that interest you.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:45 pm
From Wiki:
Its Per Capita personal income in 2008 was $54,699, 2nd in the U.S. and above the national average of $46,588.[36] Its per-capita income is the third highest in the nation with $51,358.[36] The state also has the highest percentage of millionaire households.[37] It is ranked 2nd in the nation by the number of places with per capita incomes above national average with 76.4%. Nine of New Jersey’s counties are in the wealthiest 100 of the country.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:46 pm
“New Jersey has the highest disparity of any state in the United States between what it gives to the federal government and what it receives. In fiscal year 2005, New Jersey taxpayers gave the federal government $77 billion, while only receiving $55 billion.”
Don’t think any Southern states can make a similar claim.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
10:48 pm
Bruno,
Wonder if Jimmy Hoffa is enjoying the agriculture in New Jersey?. Just guessing. Heard about mass grave, etc.
But I have heard that parts of New Jersey are beautiful. Guess you have to be there.
AmVet
February 24th, 2010
10:50 pm
Bruno, my dear friend.
You are damn near prescient. I just got home yesterday from an emergency appendectomy. And let me tell you, that was one helluva Tiny Demon! Argh…
But now I understand why the Rushheads love that Oxycodone so…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZx2r3310sk
Jay
February 24th, 2010
10:50 pm
Well Josef, it appears that all of the Adams County wealth ended up in New Jersey.
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:50 pm
As much as I’d like to stay around for a cultural analysis of the 10th Amendment. 19th Century Romantic Nationalism, and Marxist interpretation of imperialistic colonialism, tomorrow is a working day and the boss lady has already told me it ain’t going to be an easy one…so, I’ll take my unreconstruced a$$ to bed, secure in the knowledge that whatever else, I’m comfortable, happy and for the great-grandpappies, as the Chinese say, “the best revenge is living well!”
G’night all…!
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:53 pm
JAY–
That’s it! Now we know why it was that Woodrow Wilson went up there, eh? I should have taken Princeton’s offer…!
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:53 pm
“But I have heard that parts of New Jersey are beautiful. Guess you have to be there.”
Let me put it this way, Dusty. Every time I take my Southern friends up for a visit, they say that it was nothing like they imagined and that they were bowled over by everyone’s hospitality. At the same time, there is a certain grittiness to folks from Jersey. We don’t like to take a lot of crap.
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
10:53 pm
Its Per Capita personal income in 2008 was $54,699,
And my county’s per capita income in 2006 (last year I can find figures) was $25,591. That’s less than half the NJ figure. There are a variety of reasons that cause that but perhaps that explains my views on some things. Like anybody else, I’m affected by what I see on a daily basis.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:53 pm
Brother Am!
josef nix
February 24th, 2010
10:54 pm
AmVet–
Hoping all is well…good to have you back…
Mick
February 24th, 2010
10:54 pm
Dusty – read about your water heater snafu – too bad you don’t live near my dad who is a retired plumber, he would’ve fixed you for free. He would’ve been happy just to have something to do; not to mention some good ole jersey hospitality for a damsel in distress…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
10:55 pm
Don’t worry, Hillbilly, I’m from the poor section. Almost all of the wealth in Jersey is concentrated in the New York City suburbs.
md
February 24th, 2010
10:57 pm
” In fiscal year 2005, New Jersey taxpayers gave the federal government $77 billion, while only receiving $55 billion.”
“Don’t think any Southern states can make a similar claim.”
Not too sure they are doing better, sounds like they haven’t figured out how to play that game.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
10:57 pm
HI MIck,
We all love the state from whence we came. I’m sure NJ is a lovely and prosperous state. Do you think that being close to NYC might have something to do with it? Are you in Georgia now? If so, good choice!
Hillbilly Deluxe
February 24th, 2010
10:57 pm
But now I understand why the Rushheads love that Oxycodone so…
I’m not a Rushhead but Oxycodone and Hydrocodone don’t seem to have the effect on me that they do on most people. Sometimes they’ll dull pain but that’s about it. Doctors tell me I have a high tolerance to pain and a high tolerance to pain killers. That’s a mixed blessing I guess.
getalife
February 24th, 2010
11:01 pm
AmVet,
They work better if you chew them up and chase them with Crown.
I hate hospitals.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:01 pm
Damn Oxy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gvb65dCMjZI
Back in my days in Jersey, it was crystal meth.
Scout
February 24th, 2010
11:03 pm
Dusty:
Keeping American strong interests me.
Do you like pro-football? I say let’s file a civil suit to have at least two women on the field (offense and defense) at any one time. The game will still be interesting and fair (maybe even more so) but the quality will just not be the same. What say ye?
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
11:06 pm
Oh, MIck, just read your last post. I wish your Dad had been here, too. That would be mighty fine to have a nice plumber for a friend.
At last, I am now the proud posessor of hot water and that is a good feeling. (But it does kill my escuse for skipping the daily shower!)
By the way, does your Dad own a Cadillac or a Jaguar?
Mick
February 24th, 2010
11:09 pm
Dusty – I’ve lived in florida the past 40 years, so I’ve lived in the south way longer. Jersey is the most densely populated state with more people per square mile than any other. The town I grew up in looks pretty much the same and the woods that I explored with the hidden lake has all been preserved. The only place to find a familiar face is the VFW where my uncle is the big shot post commander. It was a great place to live.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:10 pm
Am–if you’re still on board:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mU9_Q7PJuNQ&NR=1
md
February 24th, 2010
11:13 pm
Hey Mick, how can jersey be so crowded when it seems they all moved south?
Mick
February 24th, 2010
11:15 pm
My dad had a cadillac but alas don’t get too far ahead with that thought, he had nine kids to raise. I still shake my head when I think about it but we had great fun and if you ever missed dinner, well tough luck..
AmVet
February 24th, 2010
11:16 pm
I’ve always thought licit drugs were the scary ones. And yeah, getalife, I’m with ya about the hospitals…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci9jA_4O3GI
Mick
February 24th, 2010
11:18 pm
md
Because people try to escape from NY to jersey but you are right they eventually make it south. Plus there are many old timers like my uncle who would never leave.
getalife
February 24th, 2010
11:20 pm
AmVet,
Oxy’s are time released but if you crush them up, they work much better.
They are very addictive.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
11:20 pm
Scout,
Yes, indeed, let us keep America strong. But not by playing football. I’m against that but still watch it occasionally.
It isn’t so much the game, just the concussions, brain damage and all that stuff. When I see former athletes being helped around like they are zombies, I lose enthusiasm for football.. First thing you know, we’ll all be wearing white ribbons with little skulls in the drive against concussion. But I hope not.
Yep, women are helping keep this country strong. Just saw a picture of one who died fighting for our country. Just doing her part. Just like a woman.
Pokey
February 24th, 2010
11:25 pm
Typical specious post by Bookman. In this case, using reconcililation to pass a trillion dollar bill IS a nuclear option. Reconcilation has never been used nor is it intended to be used to pass legislation of this scale and impact. Just ask the “father” of reconciliation. Sen Byrd, or the Senate Budget Chairman, Sen Conrad. If the Dems attempt this manuever they will pay dearly for this gross abuse of power.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:25 pm
Here’s one for you, Dusty, from the same woman who gave us “I Am Woman”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w31Sisa2TLo
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:27 pm
Pokey–I’m afraid that the Dems already know their number is up and may try something out of desperation just to stick their thumbs in our eyes one last time. They know the majority of people are against the health care bill.
md
February 24th, 2010
11:31 pm
The ole “go out in a blaze of glory” routine.
I contend to this day they never planned to work together as they thought they had those 60 seats until Nov, MA threw a kink in their plans.
Pokey
February 24th, 2010
11:32 pm
Bookman,
How many times did Hussein violate the terms of the cease fire that ended Desert Storm? Dozens? Hundreds?
Hussein fought those who threatened his power. You act as if he were a principled anti-jihadist. That is a laughable notion.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:34 pm
md–It is ironic that Teddy’s legacy won’t be a passed health care bill, but as the lost Senate seat that allowed the bill to be defeated. Teddy is da man, I say!
Mick
February 24th, 2010
11:36 pm
Is it even remotely possible that in the final outcome there may be a health care bill that helps the people? Let’s see the final product before all the gloom and doom…
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:38 pm
Gloom and doom? I’m dancing in the street that i won’t be paying any fines courtesy of Obama.
On a serious note, there are some elements of the bill that make sense. Why not pass the sensible provisions one at a time instead of bundling it into one massive, bloated, scary bill?
Scout
February 24th, 2010
11:40 pm
Dusty:
Women have always died for this country. WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan just to name a few. They are hero’s for doing so but that’s not the point.
The point is in combat you want the very, very best. That’s how you win with the fewest casualties (men or women) on your side of the equation.
And we Marines were always taught never to just “die” or “give” our life for our country …………. we were taught to “make the enemy take it and pay a very high price while doing so”. That’s why men are the best to put out there. It’s just a biological fact. To do otherwise is just as foolish as playing women in the NFL and it weakens our military.
The U.S. Marine Corps (in all probablilty the world’s best infantry fighting force) is the only one of our branches to still maintain separate boot camp training for men and women. They do so because it makes better warriors … infantrymen … riflemen … Marines.
Hopefully, we will always have enough sanity to keep the combat arms (infantry, artillery and armor) all male. It’s a question of better or best.
Time for taps …………. God bless.
Mick
February 24th, 2010
11:41 pm
Paying fines? OK then, just keep praying for good health cause that truly is your wealth..
Pokey
February 24th, 2010
11:45 pm
There is nothing in the House, Senate, or BHO proposals that can remotely be called reform. This is a tax bill and an effective takeover of a sixth of the economy. I am amazed that so many think that Obama, Reid, Pelosi, et. al. are remotely qualified to “reform” the health care system. This process is a farce.
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
11:49 pm
I do more than pray for good health, Mick, I take good care of myself. Weight is 167 at the moment.
Dusty
February 24th, 2010
11:54 pm
Well, goodnight, Bruno. Thanks for the music. Enjoy that nice warm Florida, MIck. Hope you are feeling better, AmVet..Play ball, Scout. May all of you sleep well.
I’m getting me a bowl of ice cream. Then a HOT shower and off to bed. Yes, life is good!!
md
February 24th, 2010
11:58 pm
“How many times did Hussein violate the terms of the cease fire that ended Desert Storm? Dozens? Hundreds?”
Next order of business – pull out of that teethless, worthless, ever expensive UN. Then NATO………
TnGelding
February 25th, 2010
2:07 am
Bruno
February 24th, 2010
9:26 pm
Be careful! It might be a well-armed and dangerous Reporter!
Can honesty and politics coexist? Especially since we are such accomodating dupes.
bobfromAcworth
February 25th, 2010
6:03 am
Talk about “narrow-minded”, what is it with these dem-ogogs and this johnny one-note obama health care mess that nobody wants (except the far left). Get over it, the vote on this by dems will put them out in Nov. 2010. Remember the less than 10% approval rating for Congress will wipe them out. They also like to rail against Fox or anyone else that opposes their views (joy behar, et. al.) But those media channels are slowly dying on the vine. ABC is cutting news staff, Fox is adding staff! Libs are poor losers!
I Report :-) You Whine :-( mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 25th, 2010
6:32 am
He also said that if the bill comes back from the House “full of pork, waste, fraud and abuse, I reserve the right to vote against it.” That’s also important. The House version of the bill is 10 times larger — $154 billion vs. $15 billion — than the Senate bill. With his post-vote statement, Brown positioned himself to vote against the final bill on the grounds that it is too large and wasteful. Outstanding.
With one vote, the holder of Ted Kennedy’s old seat just established himself as a supporter of tax cuts and an opponent of wasteful, bloated federal spending. And he did that while opposing Republican leadership and defining himself as a political independent. That was not traitorous; that was brilliant. -AmSpec
TaxPayer
February 25th, 2010
6:40 am
Collective stupidity…
As opposed to that singularity that you bring to the table, Whine. And what’s this about your little coach whipping out his pistol to keep you in line.
Rightwing Troll
February 25th, 2010
7:04 am
Oh my!
Looks like Andy hit the sauce pretty hard last night. I hope he’s ok this AM…
Rightwing Troll
February 25th, 2010
7:11 am
Telling stories bout his little league coach whipping something out… (that explains the locker room in his mom’s basement…) and bragging about pistol whipping a pimp in chicago. Then compensating for inadequecies by boasting bout his .45.
Must’ve been the hard stuff last night.
I did take the wife and oldest son to the firing range this past weekend, when I pulled out the .50 cal and fired one off, I had EVERYBODY’s attention. I let the wife and boy shoot the nine and the .38…
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
7:23 am
Yesterday I just thought of something relevant to the HCR debate, and way upthread H-Delux reminded me of it, when he wrote:
I agree with Bruno that it needs to be either single payer or a true free market system. I’d choose single payer.
During the 2008 primary debates, when Hillary was still trying to either out Obama as a crypto-socialist or a hypocrite by claiming that Obama used to support a single payer approach, Obama said, “If I were starting from scratch, I’d go with a single payer plan.”
Do the Republicans who keep saying “let’s start again from scratch” know this?
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 25th, 2010
7:24 am
Tightwing Hole- I’d a seen your 50 cal bulge coming from a mile away and, Pow!, right between your beady eyes, just sayin….
Normal
February 25th, 2010
7:26 am
This is sort of on topic and a very good eye opening read. Be open minded…
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/534189/gop_senators_discover_u_s_isn_t_broke_o_k_billions_for_jobs
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 25th, 2010
7:29 am
But why should the American people entrust their health care to a president who doesn’t even believe in the Hippocratic Oath? Why should the enfeebled trust a party that prides itself on snuffing out the life of Terri Schiavo?
It is not at all clear why the Democrats should enjoy the moral high ground on health care. At least the Republican proposals don’t involve killing anyone.-Nuemayr, AmSpec
Yeah but since the dummycrats are using it to immolate their own political party, it does serve a useful purpose, just sayin…
jimmy62
February 25th, 2010
7:32 am
Ahh, but playing up a Senate race as a proxy referendum for Democratic-type health care reform, and then pushing ahead anyway when you lose the election is not dishonest or wrong, of course. Calling it a referendum beforehand, and then saying it had nothing to do with health care afterward. Going against the stated will of the American people by using a technicality to pass a bill affecting 17% of the economy, that’s all good, right? Oh, and lest we not forget downplaying and/or mischaracterizing certain parts of the bill is a game both parties are playing. The Democrats are doing a better job lying, though.
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 25th, 2010
7:35 am
Lawmakers grill Toyota chief -Urinal Front Page
“Lawmakers” of course meaning the “owner’s of General Motors.”
Kangaroo court stooge fascism, neato, just like any other third world country.
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
7:38 am
There is nothing in the House, Senate, or BHO proposals that can remotely be called reform. This is a tax bill
Well, then I guess you’re ok with passing it via reconciliation then, Pokey. Glad to have you on board!
I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!
February 25th, 2010
7:39 am
NATO to restrict night raids in Afghanistan -Urinal
Easier for the enemy to see us, just sayin…
jt
February 25th, 2010
7:43 am
Gee, Michael Moore never mentioned this. It could happen here if alot of people don’t get fired in November. Statism at its finest.
“Seven Cuban doctors and a nurse say their government conspired with Venezuela and its state-owned oil company to hold them in a “modern form of slavery,” as Cuba barters their services for cheap Venezuelan oil. The doctors and nurse say they were put into “servitude for debt,” with their work used to “to discount … the commercial debt … of the subsidized oil supplies provided by Venezuela to Cuba.”
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/02/seven-cuban-doctors-sue-cuba-venezuela-for-slavery/
Jenifer
February 25th, 2010
7:47 am
Weiner Offends The GOP On House Floor: You’re All ‘Owned’ By The ‘Insurance Industry’!
Call it like it is, tell it like it is. Let the chips fall where they may.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/24/anthony-weiner-subsidiary/
Peadawg
February 25th, 2010
7:52 am
With Obama trying to pass a “jobs” bill that gives owners a $1000 tax credit to hire new employees, when they have said tax credits for business owners don’t work….ya I’d say Democrats are hypocrites. Enlighten me Democrats, If the owner couldn’t afford to hire someone BEFORE the thousand bucks, what makes you think he can hire someone WITH an extra thousand bucks?
Jenifer
February 25th, 2010
7:56 am
House OKs Bill To Criminalize Intentional Miscarriages
I say make a man’s sperm just as sacrosanct as a woman’s eggs.
You don’t want to waste or destroy any eggs, you also have to ensure the protection of each and every single sperm.
Let’s start counting these puppies! No more spilling the seed. Think of the lives we’d save.
http://www.sltrib.com/utahpolitics/ci_14295563
Doggone/GA
February 25th, 2010
7:59 am
“what makes you think he can hire someone WITH an extra thousand bucks?”
Personally? I have the same question. I see no point in bills like that.
Peadawg
February 25th, 2010
7:59 am
You’re joking, right Jenifer? Oh wait…you must be a muttonhead like Cynthia keeps talking about.
stw
February 25th, 2010
7:59 am
JAY: Wrong Jocko. Reconciliation was aimed at “BUDGET” matters not healthcare. Loved Sir Harry’s explantation for rise in domestic violence due to shortage in jobs.
Jenifer
February 25th, 2010
8:04 am
In South Carolina Poll, Obama Does Better Than GOP Senators
In all fairness, Demented is working diligently on his image, having reduced his cross burning rallies in his home state from weekly to bi-weekly.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/25/88258/in-south-carolina-poll-obama-does.html
Outhouse GoKart
February 25th, 2010
8:04 am
“Conscious effort to deceive is unacceptable”
This would apply to Obama and his ramming thru this HCare debacle.
Peadawg
February 25th, 2010
8:07 am
“This would apply to Obama and his ramming thru this HCare debacle.”
Also calling it a “jobs bill”. Just call it like it is…a big waste of spending!
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:11 am
g’morning all …
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:11 am
I guess the drinking game will involve Republicans using the phrase “ramming through,” today.
Normal
February 25th, 2010
8:11 am
Ah, but Peadawg, the GOP want to spend bucks on jobs. Read my earlier post…
Corey
February 25th, 2010
8:11 am
Vinny, what part of health care being 17% – and rising- of our GDP do you not understand? We as a nation cannot continue to go down that path. It contributes to the deficit, cripples small businesses and bankrupts Americans. We accept your not being for health care reform and your political leanings, but take the time and do some serious inquiry into what the continued growth rate of our GDP being health care means. Republicans know this, but they are only looking forward to the next election. Every contender for the oval office on both the left and right during the presidential campaign championed health care reform. Now amnesia sets in.
ken R
February 25th, 2010
8:12 am
Breitbart, is learning from Obama if he is lying, it is one thing to be caught in a lie, Obama doesn’t know where the truth begins and a lie ends. He is the King.
Doggone/GA
February 25th, 2010
8:12 am
sfd…yep, looks like “ramming” is the word of the day.
Normal
February 25th, 2010
8:12 am
Top of the morn’ to you USinUK!
metoo
February 25th, 2010
8:12 am
Never confuse a republican with the facts.
Steve
February 25th, 2010
8:13 am
Excellent thread, Jay. It’s time we stood up to the deception and lies being spoon fed to the gullible public by the corporatists.
Jenifer
February 25th, 2010
8:14 am
Wine, Groceries, Car Repair: What Florida’s Rubio Charged To GOP
Is the bloom off golden boy?
http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/02/25/1499172/wine-groceries-car-repair-what.html
DAVID: AJC Truth Detector
February 25th, 2010
8:16 am
JAY—-AND YOU ARE “EDITOR -N-CHIEF–of the DECEPTION UNIT–at the Atlanta-Obama-Journal…If you had POWER—CLOUT—-You would be dangerous—-As it is..You are just an amusement..not to be taken too seriously
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:16 am
“I guess the drinking game will involve Republicans using the phrase “ramming through,” today”
thank gawd I’m not driving …
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:17 am
Liberal Democrat = Deception, Deceit, Misrepresentation, Dissimulation, Conjuration and Trickeration.
Sorry, that last one is not a real word but I heard it once in Federal court from a not so learned defendant. “Your honor, those federal agents used trickeration on me!”
Peadawg
February 25th, 2010
8:17 am
“Read my earlier post…”
I went the through the pages and didn’t see it….it’s still early
. what time was it posted?
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:20 am
yeah, brakeman – and the GOP is pure as the driven snow
md
February 25th, 2010
8:24 am
“NATO spokesman Brig. Gen. Eric Tremblay, speaking alongside Azimi, urged Afghans to recognize that international troops are putting themselves in greater danger in order to try to protect civilians.
“We are going beyond the laws of armed conflict by increasing our risk,” Tremblay said. ”
Where’s scout, del , jarhead……so nice to know that neighbor John’s life is considered less important.
Bob
February 25th, 2010
8:26 am
Speaking of Liars, did anyone see the tape of Obo saying he had no connection to ACORN except one case where he was brought in by the Justice dept. Now we have tape of Obo saying how involved he was with ACORN through the years, no deception here, just another lie.
Normal
February 25th, 2010
8:27 am
Peadawg, 0726.
Peadawg
February 25th, 2010
8:29 am
“POLITICIAN = Deception, Deceit, Misrepresentation, Dissimulation, Conjuration and Trickeration.”
there, I fixed it for you Brakeman.
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:29 am
USinUK:
By comparison …………… you are correct.
To All Liberals:
Please take the time to read this very important short local news article. Racism is morally wrong. We all know that. But you don’t realize how many of “your” freedoms you are losing when someone loses their right to be an ignorant racist if that’s what they want. None of this is the school’s busines – period ! This is a parental issue. We are headed down a very slippery slope here ……….. and the “thought” police are ready to pounce !
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/news/22665455/detail.html
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:31 am
Peadawg:
In general you are correct ……….. but the libs. are far worse.
Bob
February 25th, 2010
8:32 am
This is deception.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/02/oh-me-oh-my-obama-caught-in-a-major-acorn-lie-video/
Peadawg
February 25th, 2010
8:32 am
You give us a bad name Brakeman…you’re being as biased as Bookman and Cynthia Tucker.
Morrus
February 25th, 2010
8:32 am
Vote out the incumbents and start over
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:33 am
did anyone see the tape of Obo saying he had no connection to ACORN
you know, the tape! of the guy! come on, you saw it, right, where he said the thing, about the stuff?
Outhouse GoKart
February 25th, 2010
8:33 am
Brakeman
Hopefully those brazen little kids will tell the school and staff to F-off.
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:34 am
“CNN Poll: Only 25% want Dems to pass their health bills….”
What to do with the 75% who are not “enlightened”…..what to do?
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:35 am
Peadawg:
Sorry, I worked with and saw both sides for almost 30 years. It’s an observable difference. Kind of like comparing politicians to dogs ………. they’re all dogs but some are labs and some are pit bulls.
You are entitled to your opinion.
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:35 am
Brakeman –
“In general you are correct ……….. but the libs. are far worse.”
dude. seriously. that kind of attitude belongs in 4th grade.
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:36 am
Riiiiight. I want the gubmint to be responsible for my healthcare.
Stafford Hospital caused ‘unimaginable suffering’
“An independent inquiry found that managers at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust stopped providing safe care because they were preoccupied with government targets and cutting costs.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article7039285.ece
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:37 am
Outhouse GoKart:
Hopefully, their parents will wash their mouths out with soap but the point is we are losing our freedoms. It NONE of the schools business to single them out individually.
If the school wants to have an assembly for everyone to go over “being nice” that’s fine …………. but that is where it should stop unless it happened on school property or on the bus, etc.
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:37 am
And the govt healthcare carnage continues:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1253438/Mid-Staffordshire-NHS-hospital-routinely-neglected-patients.html
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:38 am
USinUK:
See my 8:35 to peadawg ………………. I stand by my observations.
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:39 am
tick….tick….tick…
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-the-real-lessons-of-this-nhs-disaster-1909596.html
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:39 am
dB – “you know, the tape! of the guy! come on, you saw it, right, where he said the thing, about the stuff?”
kinda like the infamous “whitey” tape …
“My best friend’s sister’s boyfriend’s brother’s girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who’s going with the girl who saw Ferris pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it’s pretty serious.”
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:40 am
Brakeman – “I stand by my observations” … just make sure you get a hall pass …
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:41 am
What to do with the 75% who are not “enlightened”…..what to do?
We might ask them to stop posting bits of factoids utterly devoid of context, posing as news. But I have found it does little good.
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
8:41 am
USinUK:
Don’t you have some “fog” to go walk in or something?
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:41 am
“Obama Rejects Attackers’ Cries of ‘Socialism’”
But if the shoe fits…..
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:42 am
kinda like the infamous “whitey” tape …
Hey, it’s out there. Drudge said so.
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:42 am
not jimmeh – “cutting costs”
um. and you don’t think that the for-profit hospitals in the US do the same??? you are naive …
Outhouse GoKart
February 25th, 2010
8:43 am
Agreed Brakeman. None of the schools, govts business.
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:43 am
Brakeman –
“Don’t you have some “fog” to go walk in or something?”
since households haven’t used coal for heat in the last 40 years … no.
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:44 am
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:41 am
You’re such a valued customer that I’ll begin posting links so you won’t be confused by “bits of factoids”, okay? Feel all better now?
david wayne osedach
February 25th, 2010
8:45 am
They will use whatever it takes and that includes deception.
Doggone/GA
February 25th, 2010
8:45 am
“Hopefully, their parents will wash their mouths out with soap ”
You’ve got to be joking. Who do you think they learned that attitude from?
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
8:47 am
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:42 am
Please provide a link to a story about many, or even one, of the evil “for profit” hospitals you apparently loathe.
Mick
February 25th, 2010
8:48 am
Brakeman
**To All Liberals**
Why are you addressing only liberuls?
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:51 am
not jimmeh – 8:47 … okay:
http://industry.bnet.com/healthcare/1000424/hospital-losses-lead-to-cuts-in-multiple-areas/
These adverse events have caused headline-grabbing layoffs at many hospitals. A less publicized result has been cutbacks in supply orders. A poll done by Novation, a large group purchasing organization, shows that 69 percent of hospitals plan to delay or cancel equipment purchases. That could have ripple effects on manufacturers of medical devices and many other kinds of hospital supplies.
Meanwhile, hospitals are also pulling in their horns on health IT investments. A December survey by Healthcare Informatics indicates that 71 percent of hospitals expected their health IT budgets to be smaller in 2009 than they were in 2008. Thirty-six percent of respondents said they were reducing their IT commitments because of the economy. Nineteen percent said they had postponed some IT purchases, and 16 percent had postponed all nonessential IT projects.
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:55 am
not jimmeh –
http://articles.latimes.com/2001/may/07/health/he-60336
The nurses reported that their working conditions have declined as hospitals try to hold down costs. And that was true whether for nurses working at U.S. hospitals, where private managed care companies have strongly influenced how services are delivered, or in Canada and Europe, which have nationalized health systems.
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:59 am
jimmy, here’s an oldie but goodie:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/341/6/420
Both the rates of per capita Medicare spending and the increases in spending rates were greater in areas served by for-profit hospitals than in areas served by not-for-profit hospitals.
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:59 am
Mick – “Why are you addressing only liberuls?” because he believes that conservatives should be nominated for sainthood.
Dr. Doom
February 25th, 2010
9:04 am
Obama’s “healthcare reform” is the biggest fraud and scam yet perpetuated against the American people. Healthcare is nothing but a huge power-grab to pay off cronies and the “chosen few” such as General Electric (GE).
Did you notice that GE is already running television commercials praising how they’re going to “help” facilitate healthcare? I think GE’s commercial of the guy sitting in his underwear while about 200 people are staring at him says it all. Do you want ALL your medical records available to ANYONE that can hack a computer?
just thinkin'
February 25th, 2010
9:04 am
Willful deception? Do you mean like “under Obamacare you can keep your current health plan” or “You can keep your doctor”? Is that what you mean by willful deception? Or how about “I’m not a socialist”? All lies from the empty suit in the White House to fool the gullible.
Mick
February 25th, 2010
9:08 am
USinUK
It is the sign of a small mind that thinks in terms of labels…
jms
February 25th, 2010
9:08 am
Jewcowboy,
Here are some more fun stats for you from the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress:
In 2007 the top 1% of tax filers paid 40.42% of all federal income taxes. The top 5% paid 60.63%. The top 10% paid 71.22%. The top 25% paid 86.59%. The top 50% paid 97.11%.
Rightwing Troll
February 25th, 2010
9:09 am
Stooge,
nobody with any sense carries a piece like that around for “protection”, it would be impossible to draw and fire quickly. While you were staring at my “bulge” the nine would be out and emptied, (if the situation so warranted). Although I doubt a gun would be needed to deal with a porch dog blog troll full of anonymous bravado…
thomas
February 25th, 2010
9:09 am
Jay,
Interesting that you would write an entire piece about how members of the media may try to lie or twist the truth to help their ideology.
Would you also consider it lying or twisting the truth to give quotes but leave out key essential parts of the quote to make a point for their side?
You know like YOU did a few days ago and were going to allow your readers to continue to read it as fact. You didn’t change it after the first person called you out on it. Only after the second did you offer a half hearted “my bad”.
But why should any be surprised you would use deceit as a method, as i recall this is not the first time you have used an inaccurate quote or quotes. But I guess it is different if the person lying does not share your ideology.
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
9:10 am
he believes that conservatives should be nominated for sainthood.
and that when you say “hey all you libruls”, anyone to the left of him will think, “hey, someone cares about me! I best listen to what this individual has to say! could be important.”
Because we humans all so love being reduced to a social stereotype.
just thinkin'
February 25th, 2010
9:10 am
Did I forget to mention that Obamacare will save us money and lower the deficit? Let’s look at the record so far: Stimulus bill created jobs at only $170,000 per job; cash for clunkers cost us only $28,000 per car, the winterization progam cost only $78,000 per house. And now he wants to do the same with healthcare? C’mon, liberals, this guy is a nightmare, but then that’s about what we non-believers expected from the start. Only the really dumb ones believed otherwise.
Bob
February 25th, 2010
9:11 am
Only progressives can watch a video and deny what was on it. Maybe that is why they hate Beck, he shows a video of Anita Dunn claiming Mao to be one of her inspirations and he is a liar. He shows a video of Obos FCC head praising Chavez and communism and Beck is the liar. reconcilliation and the nuclear option are one in the same whether jay and his lemmings admit it or not.
Doggone/GA
February 25th, 2010
9:11 am
“In 2007 the top 1% ”
Someday I’d like to see a breakdown of those percentages on a per dollar basis, instead of a per capita basis.
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
9:12 am
of all federal income taxes.
only 43% of revenues come from income taxes.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/02/in-depth-look-at-federal-budget.html
nearly as much come from automatic witholdings, which righties conveniently love to leave out of the equation.
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
9:20 am
USinUK
February 25th, 2010
8:51 am
You missed my point and were comparing apples to oranges. I merely asked which evil “for profit” hospitals were repeatedly negligent with the most basic of healthcare. Instead, you responded by linking an article that says for profit hospitals are delaying the purchase of new equipment.
The delay in purchasing new equipment versus hundreds of unnecessary deaths as a result of govt run healthcare.
And you had the gall to call me “naive” earlier?
Kevin H
February 25th, 2010
9:23 am
I agree with Jay that we need to be respectful in our disagreements. To the issue of reconciliation, did not Sen Byrd who was the author of reconciliation several years ago state last year that the process should not be used for passing healthcare reform and/or cap and trade? I am asking for confirmation from anyone.
Thanks
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
9:24 am
stands for decibels
February 25th, 2010
8:59 am
I think you “oldie but goodie” is actually a “cash for clunker”. I posted articles regarding hundreds of unnecessary deaths in UK hospitals supported by govt healthcare and you counter with “higher medicare rates at for profit hospitals”?
Are you truly that partisan? Really?
Jimmy Carter
February 25th, 2010
9:34 am
Kevin H
February 25th, 2010
9:23 am
I agree, we need to be more respectful. Here’s a few of Jay’s “respectful” comments directed towards me yesterday:
“Have you no shame..”
“Yet to make yourself feel better about your political choices, you’re willing to ignore reality and embrace deception.”
I didn’t try to bait him, nor did I address him disrespectfully. I merely disagreed with his opinion.
Brakeman
February 25th, 2010
9:48 am
Ah, yes “labels”.
That’s why we put “poison” on certain bottles, etc.
Liberalism (in its pure form) is poison for this country. Always has been, always will be.
As has been said before, a democracy is the only form of government that is automatically set up to “allow” for its own destruction. Liberalism (under the false impression/deception of doing good) is usually the catalyst in that formula.
Just one’s man’s opinion. Gotta run to N.C. to check on Mom. Have a nice weekend.
Scout
February 25th, 2010
9:57 am
Ah, deception at its finest:
Headline (CBS): “Dems Plot Post-Summit Health Care Coup”
BuzztheKiller
February 25th, 2010
10:17 am
Your jealousy and envy of Andrew Breitbart has no bounds Jay. I know it is hard watching someone who does what you do actually has a following and is successful at it, but come on, accusing him of lying? He is a journalist, surely they never lie to advance an agenda, right?? Chirp, Chirp, chirp…
29
February 25th, 2010
10:49 am
CNN just reported that a killer whale burst through the ice in Vancouver and devoured the Jamaican bobsled team.
On Topic: If overriding the 2/3’s majority rule for ending filibuster is the nuclear option, then reconciliation is the Aaron Burr option. A single shot. A one time debate killer. Of course it is inappropriate, but sometimes partisanship needs killin’. This is one of those times.
CPAC should be required viewing for all americans. If America would watch it and listen, then the Tea Party would unparadoxically end up at the bottom of Boston Harbor where it began, under the whale poop, (I’m trying to think of a movie with a killer whale in it, but I’m coming up zero, there’s got to be one, but nothing comes to mind.)
Writer’s block is not pretty. The movie “Cop-Out” has a scene where every movie ever made get’s mentioned during a good-cop, bad-cop bit that the two buddy-cops perform to get a rat to squeal. It totally abuses the movie reference genre of comedy and now it’s lame to use movie ref’s. Not fair. I formally abandon them as of now. BTW: You can tell a movie will stink when the star tours the talk show circuit; the bigger the star and the more talk shows visited, the bigger the stench. (Bruce Willis has been stalking the talk shows 24/7)
P.U.
ster
February 26th, 2010
2:28 pm
Sorry, but Beitbart is ‘more correct’ on this one. Sure, the nuclear option is different than reconciliation, however, in the manner being applied by this Congress, it’s trying to do the same thing.
Reconciliation is ONLY for budget items. That is the problem. They are trying to defy the spirit of the law and Constitution without actually breaking it. Sorry, we are right to be outraged.
As for 51 votes in Confirmation hearings… it is the “advise and consent” of the Senate… it DOES NOT MENTION 60 votes needed for Confirmations. Actually, the Constitution does not specifically even require a vote!!!!
So, while Breitbart may not be 100% correct in describing these, most of us who watch him KNOW THAT. Sorry, we’re not stupid. We know that and still accept the idea that it’s wrong and basically the same thing as the nuclear option.
DUH!
ster
February 26th, 2010
2:30 pm
Funny how the lib media is more outraged at Breitbart for not correctly describing the difference between the nuclear option and reconciliation.
But outrage at the Government for trying to defy the spirit of the Constitution? Oh… that’s not important!
/crickets
Jay
February 26th, 2010
2:33 pm
The Constitution, ster?
You’ve lost me. There is nothing in the Constitution about filibusters or reconciliation or any such thing.
escort girls India
July 17th, 2010
8:19 am
It is very interesting for me to read this blog. Thanx for it. I like such themes and anything that is connected to them. I would like to read more on this site soon.
Mary Karver