Tebow anti-abortion ad in the Super Bowl just free speech

I admire Florida football star Tim Tebow, both for what he does on the field and for who he is off the field. By all accounts he tries to live his Christian faith, and I’ve never been bothered by his efforts to proselytize. Even in the Biblical citations he wears in his eyeblack, he shows the good manners to proclaim his faith quietly without questioning or condemning that of others. OK by me.

Tebow is now the focus of a bit of controversy involving an anti-abortion ad in which he stars with his mother. The ad, sponsored by James Dobson’s Focus on the Family, will air during the Super Bowl, and some pro-choice groups are protesting the ad’s acceptance by CBS. They do have a point.

As the Washington Post reports, the Women’s Media Center and other groups “questioned how and why the network, which used to forbid ‘advocacy’ advertising, agreed to air Focus on the Family’s spot, which is valued at $2.5 million to $3 million.”

“The media center also noted that as recently as 2004, CBS had rejected an ad from the United Church of Christ, which wanted to use the Super Bowl as a chance to tell people it welcomes gay members. The center says CBS also has rejected ads in the past from MoveOn.org and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.”

The question of fairness is legitimate, but if this is really a new policy at CBS that will be extended to other causes as well, liberal and conservative, fine. The previous policy — designed not to offend anybody — never really made sense anyway, not in an advertising culture where discussion of four-hour erections and urinary problems have become standard.

And if Tebow wants to use his hard-earned fame to promote causes that he believes in, fine as well. I just hope he picks his spots carefully and stays wary about how others want to use him.

810 comments Add your comment

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
8:15 am

Being a Georgia fan, it’s hard to root for a Gator. But Tebow is such a great guy I can’t help it. I hope he does well in the NFL!!!

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
8:16 am

gttim

January 27th, 2010
8:18 am

If you think this new policy will be extended to liberal causes, then you are smoking crack. It will not be. Damn liberal media!

BTW Focus on the Family’s Dobson is the guy who wrote this:

“Meanwhile, the boy’s father has to do his part. He needs to mirror and affirm his son’s maleness. He can play rough-and-tumble games with his son, in ways that are decidedly different from the games he would play with a little girl. He can help his son learn to throw and catch a ball. He can teach him to pound a square wooden peg into a square hole in a pegboard. He can even take his son with him into the shower, where the boy cannot help but notice that Dad has a penis, just like his, only bigger.”

Just saying.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:18 am

didn’t Tebow seriously muff a game in front of recruiters the other day???

as far as the ad goes, is anyone surprised that they are kow-towing to Dobson and his bunch???

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
8:21 am

“didn’t Tebow seriously muff a game in front of recruiters the other day???”

His first day of Senior Bowl Practice in front of NFL Scouts didn’t go very well. He’s never taken a snap from under center and his delivery is really really bad. Hopefully he gets better.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:21 am

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
8:16 am

Dems seem always confused about one thing or the other.

justme

January 27th, 2010
8:22 am

Can you just hear the screams if somebody wanted to air a pro choice ad. Talk about a double standard.

Jay

January 27th, 2010
8:22 am

Dawg, I suspect that throwing motion will doom his NFL chances at QB. If he could fix it, he would have by now, and it’s really not going to work in the pros.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:23 am

Peadawg –

the way I see it, anyone who can do what QBs do when a bunch of 300-lb+ guys are trying to flatten you gets a great big SAAAAA-LUTE from me.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:25 am

this is a suck-up to all the people who were scarred for life over the “wardrobe malfunction”, all the people who complain about the preponderance of beer ads, all the people who complain about the scantily clad wimmen in the preponderance of beer ads … etc …

Call it like it is.

January 27th, 2010
8:26 am

Way to go CBS. There is no secret here. Tebow is sending out a great message that a lot of young people should hear. CBS executives know it. Why didnt they air the United Church of Christ and their Gay message? Because despite what the left would have you believe, the great majority of America does not support gays or their agenda, and CBS would have lost millions of viewers. This is not rocket science.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
8:28 am

I agree Jay. The way he has to “wind up” his arm…Dwight Freeney or Demarcus Ware will be all over that like a fat kid on a twinkie.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
8:29 am

Mick, he may be opening a door…but atleast he’s not afraid to speak about what he believes in. If you’ve read about all he’s done…he really is a stand up guy!

Mick

January 27th, 2010
8:29 am

Nothing against tebow and his message, but why open this door? Well, tivo makes life so much simpler anyway….

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:30 am

Discretionary spending freeze? Just another shell game…another pitiful attempt by the Coconut to “throw us a bone.” Its another in a long list of Obama-Scams…

After Brown victory, Obama struggles to control message
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/ynews_ts1077

Bud Wiser

January 27th, 2010
8:32 am

Oh how the left wing socialist morons would love to stifle free speech in America, particularly when it is not their own. If one can only promote their point of view, then the ignorant public will come to take it as the truth.

(Gag)

Also concerning free speech:

a. If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

b. If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

c. If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

d. If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

e. If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States , would you have said that he is clueless?

f. If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas , would you have thought he was a self important, conceded, egotistical idiot?

g. If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

h. If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word “advice” would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can’t think of anything? Don’t worry. He’s done all this in less than 12 months — so you’ll have three years to come up with an answer…

There is a difference between free and stupid speech. The uppity Kenyan has demonstrated stupidity at its very finest.

Normal

January 27th, 2010
8:32 am

Tebow would make a good Tight End, H Back, or Strong Safety…

As to his ad, I think it’s his right, but I think running it during the game is tacky. The Super Bowl is supposed to be bringing people together for a few hours…

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:33 am

Nothing against tebow and his message, but why open this door?

Because corporate media hates you. Duh.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:33 am

call it –

“the great majority of America does not support gays or their agenda”

and the great majority of America doesn’t believe in prohibiting abortion – according to a Gallup survey, 76% of people want to keep it legal in some form.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
8:33 am

It should kept fair and balanced, let Dr. Tiller state the opposing view……OOOPS! Can’t do that, they murdered him in church.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
8:34 am

Bud

When posting other peoples work, even if it is crap, you should note that.

Eric

January 27th, 2010
8:34 am

I’ll admire Tebow when he poses for Playgirl and admits that he smokes pot. There’s no reason to admire the ideals of someone who hasn’t lived yet. When the reality of the real world sets in, who knows what his ideals will be. Til then, he’s outta line.

Curious

January 27th, 2010
8:34 am

In this economic climate, CBS, like the AJC, needs to sell an ad wherever and to whomever it can. The interesting part will come when it airs a pro-choice ad and must absorb the wrath of the conservative noise machine. Can CBS take the heat? I doubt it. On the other hand, what’s the difference in an anti-abortion ad and an ad for a candidate touting his anti-abortion stance?

GRIT

January 27th, 2010
8:34 am

Abortion is murder, it offends me. What about my feelings on the subjeck? All you marxists, Communists, Socialists and Obamaists need to realise that we are going to take our nation back.
I’ll bet CBS caves in, anyone want to take that bet?

david wayne osedach

January 27th, 2010
8:35 am

I don’t think he will get the results he wants from this ad placed in the Super Bowl. The viewers are more focused on the game and enjoying themselves.

Road Scholar

January 27th, 2010
8:35 am

Such a non-story! If you don’t like it, don’t watch it! Besides, if it airs after halftime, most won’t see it since the SB is usually over by halftime!

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:35 am

“If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?”

Yeppers…tacky tacky tacky…what a loser.

Normal

January 27th, 2010
8:35 am

The Defence of Kentucky (my school) showed him a little of what it would be like in the NFL as QB… Man, what a hit! Drove him into his team mates knee and, presto change-o, a first rate concussion.

suwaneedawg

January 27th, 2010
8:35 am

Although I am right of center to me this ad is not about right or left. If the Women’s Media Center is worked up they can either run their own ad or don’t watch it. My understanding the ad simply says that he is grateful his mother had the courage to not do what the doctor’s advised her to, abort her baby. I will get political for one statement. The left believes in freedom of speech until the speech is against one of their core belief’s. To sum it up, they are speech nazi’s.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:36 am

and the great majority of America doesn’t believe in prohibiting abortion – according to a Gallup survey, 76% of people want to keep it legal in some form.

yebbut yebbut yebbut I gots this one pole that sez more people think “pro-life” sounds nicer than “pro-choice” so U R Rong!

Ron

January 27th, 2010
8:37 am

If he wants to talk about his causes, he has the right. If you don’t like it, spend $3MM and buy your own spot. CBS has the right to change their mind on policy. I would say the same thing if he was pro choice. We have way too many people trying to legislate free speech lately!

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
8:37 am

Come on, why the uproar? afterall, isn’t the ad celebrating the “choice” Mrs. Tebow made?

The Coach

January 27th, 2010
8:37 am

The First Amendment provides that the GOVERNMENT cannot censor speech. A private company can do what they want.

Scooter

January 27th, 2010
8:38 am

I don’t have an opinion about the ad one way or the other but I do have an opinion about Tebow. He is a great college QB but he isn’t NFL material.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:39 am

Pro-abortion sounds like an acceptable term, or should be.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:39 am

Curious –

“On the other hand, what’s the difference in an anti-abortion ad and an ad for a candidate touting his anti-abortion stance?”

one is an advocacy ad, the other is not.

Suwanee –

“The left believes in freedom of speech until the speech is against one of their core belief’s. To sum it up, they are speech nazi’s.”

first of all, no apostrophe is needed for nazi – you were using the plural, not the possessive.

secondly, this isn’t a freedom of speech issue – this is an issue of the SuperBowl network negating their own “no advocacy” policy.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:39 am

Pro-abortion sounds like an acceptable term, or should be.

No, it’s not. It is as inaccurate as claiming that those who believe drug use should be decriminalized are “pro-drug” or even “pro-addiction.”

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
8:39 am

Well, this ad is valued at 3 million dollars and, just like a politician caught up in a bidding war from competing corporations for his services, they have to think about the bottom line.

mary

January 27th, 2010
8:39 am

Tim Tebow is an exceptional athlete and individual with a true conscience and belief in his GOD. I am thrilled that he has the GUTS to play the media game. God has a plan and NO ONE will stop it….Thank you Tim Tebow!

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
8:40 am

Eric @ 8:34,

If Tebow made it thru college without falling for those, I’d say he’s the real deal.

Like it or not, it is absolutely CBS’s decision. If they suddenly want to go pro-Christian and far right, who should be allowed to stop them? If you don’t like it, don’t watch. The ratings go down, and they may change their minds…

lmno

January 27th, 2010
8:40 am

CBS is right to air this ad.

CBS was wrong to not air the ad by the United Church of Christ.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:41 am

dB –

“yebbut yebbut yebbut”

uyrtrtuyrtyuuyrtrutyrtuyrtuyrtyu <— (the sound of me hitting my forehead on my keyboard repeatedly)

DAVID-AJC Truth detector

January 27th, 2010
8:42 am

IT IS REAL EASY BEING FOR ABORTION…..once you are born…..

Jay

January 27th, 2010
8:42 am

Obamayourmama, back off the personal attacks and insults please.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:42 am

If history is any indicator Mr Obama will tonite step from his current pile into and even bigger pile this evening!! Perhaps a viewing might provide some needed comedy relief?!! Ya…thats it…we need another grandiose speech!

YES WE CAN, HHRUMPF!!

State of the Union speech unlikely to ease worries, analysts say
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/26/obama.sotu.tone/index.html?hpt=T1

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:43 am

“I am thrilled that he has the GUTS to play the media game.”

yeah … boy-howdy, those white christian boys are so put-upon! talk about suffering!!!

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:44 am

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:39 am

Seems one is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion. So….

Raydio

January 27th, 2010
8:44 am

Face it, women’s groups are upset because the ad is effective.

.......

January 27th, 2010
8:44 am

Tebow is a real mystery. Has anyone here seen pics of his girlfriend? She has the most amazing rack! Yet, he doesn’t play with them.

Frankly, I can’t believe God would make something as attractive as his Girlfriend’s rack with the intention of covering them and I believe he is probably angering God by not using this gift to his full advantage.

If God were to bless me with such a beautiful rack to enjoy, I would shout it from the mountain tops praising his name and saying, “Glory be to God who gave me this wonderous rack to enjoy!”

Jan Brewington

January 27th, 2010
8:44 am

Enter your comments here CBS, please run the ad. There is nothing hateful about this ad. Do not bow to pressure from people who want the ad pulled. They do not want any light shining on the fact that humans can choose to bear their offspring rather than kill them.

suwaneedawg

January 27th, 2010
8:45 am

UK, thanks for the grammar lesson. Bottomline, if CBS wants to change their policy that is their business decision. Like I said, be fair and run and ad of opposing view. I will bet you they end up buckling under the pressure of the left groups and don’t run the ad.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:45 am

Outhouse –

“Seems one is either pro-abortion or anti-abortion. So….”

actually, there are a lot of people who would not choose abortion if they were in that predicament, but feel that other people should have the right to make the choice for themselves.

.......

January 27th, 2010
8:45 am

Tebow’s Girlfriend is a reason to believe.

http://www.zimbio.com/Tim+Tebow’s+Girlfriend/articles/13/Tim+Tebow+s+Girlfriend

DAVID-AJC Truth detector

January 27th, 2010
8:45 am

JUST THINK………..If people in HAITI were mostly liberals…& pro-abortion…..there would not be all the unwanted orphans…….You would not have all these orphans ……if the liberals had their way…NO…..NO…..No

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

January 27th, 2010
8:46 am

Well, why don’t they show a ad about how this Obama wasn’t born in America and shouldn’t be President? And maybe one that talks about how important it is to have some guns in the house. They show all these ads about these home security systems. Why don’t they show one about the REAL security system, the Smith & Wesson kind? Or maybe a ad that shows people using all cash, instead of all those ads telling people who to call to welch on a debt–no offense, Andy.

Anyhow, the Tebow ad won’t matter much. About the time it comes on every town and city in American will report low water pressure from all that flushing.

Have a good day everybody.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:46 am

suwanee –

“if CBS wants to change their policy that is their business decision.”

no argument there. but, then, they should be ready to face the fire when they do.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:47 am

Speaking of free speech, advertising, and use of the term “pro-abortion”, the allegedly liberal AJC provided ad space to some Fundie nutball chuch who placed an ad in the Faith And Values section of church listings, the last weekend before the 2008 presidential election.

A headline blared “Barack Obama is 100% Pro-Abortion” and the accompanying graphic was an adorable pic of a multiracial assortment of lil’ babies who were, apparently, going to be slaughtered if the Uppity Kenyan were to permitted to win.

(I wish I were making this up.)

danjonglee

January 27th, 2010
8:47 am

Is Cindy Sheehan still travelin and doin speeches..?….

Obamayourmama

January 27th, 2010
8:47 am

Jay, you are kidding right? If you blocked the personal attacks on your site you would have half the responses you get. That being said, I will do my best to keep it pc with the bigot’s.

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
8:48 am

never really understood why some on the “pro choice”/”pro abortion” side claim that being anti abortion is being anti women’s rights. Is the “pro life”/”anti abortion” side only trying to stop male fetuses from being aborted?

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:49 am

there are a lot of people who would not choose abortion if they were in that predicament, but feel that other people should have the right to make the choice for themselves.

Just as those who would not carry a handgun, but feel others should be able to do so with relative ease. Those people are not “pro-gun”. “pro-Gun-rights,” sure.

And I’ll gladly own up to being pro-abortion rights.

Truth

January 27th, 2010
8:50 am

Jay,

He will go to a team and play h-back so he can be moved around and even throw the ball some. The unfortunate part is that Jax might draft him to play QB to save their franchise… Not fair to Tebow.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:50 am

“bigot’s”

criminey. is today Throw an Apostrophe Anywhere you Danged Well Please Day???

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
8:50 am

LOL…this funny…

Health care reform better off with women in charge?
http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/26/health-care-reform-better-off-with-women-in-charge/

“Shea-Porter added that she wasn’t trying to “diss” the men in Congress, but that females understand how to care for relatives and that they could find “common ground there.”

Diss? Shameful.

no-more-ads

January 27th, 2010
8:50 am

No more Ads please!! I just want to watch the game. I’m already sick of the pre-game as it is. All the talking and team-breakdowns. I’ve even started to get annoyed by the game announcers calling the game. I just want to hear the play-by-play. Its a football game I can read bios on players and how they grew up later on. Just call the game.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:51 am

dB – 8:49 – you are sooooooooo batting 1000 today!!

(raucous bowling applause)

DJ

January 27th, 2010
8:52 am

Jay, I actually agree with you for once!

lmno

January 27th, 2010
8:52 am

Others don’t like abortion at all, however they feel that criminalizing it would create a black market thhat would make their communities less safe. They don’t want anyone to have an abortion, but accept that people will have abortions whether legal or illegal and feel its safer for everyone to keep it legal.

# 1 cause of death for pregnant women = homicide

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
8:53 am

ty –

“being anti abortion is being anti women’s rights”

wow – I know I’ve only been out of the country for a little under 4 years, but have American men been getting pregnant in my absence??? how have I missed this in the news!!!

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
8:54 am

“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.” Obi-Wan Tebow

Seriously, if the leftist groups really wanted this to go away, they’d just leave it be and not make a big deal about it. The more they whine about it, the more attention it gets. Cutting it now would be a bigger PR nightmare for CBS than what they are currently facing. But go ahead leftists, because though I don’t feel the government has a say one way or another on abortion, it is still murder. I support anything that helps women make the right choice…

Obamayourmama

January 27th, 2010
8:54 am

US’s get’s back’s to teaching’s class’s and get’s off the site’s. You’s are to’s damn picky’s.
Just for you big guy, just for you.

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

Jay, you are kidding right? If you blocked the personal attacks on your site you would have half the responses you get. That being said, I will do my best to keep it pc with the bigot’s.

Testy, aren’t we.

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

have American men been getting pregnant in my absence

I saw another headline about a pregnant man the other day but I don’t know if he was American.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

[[The question of fairness is legitimate,]]

Life isn’t fair.

[[The previous policy — designed not to offend anybody — never really made sense anyway,]]

There are groups of people who will always find a way to be offended by something, anything…

[[And if Tebow wants to use his hard-earned fame to promote causes that he believes in, fine as well. I just hope he picks his spots carefully and stays wary about how others want to use him.]]

Great advice. Too bad a certain Texas governor headed to Washington didn’t heed it. Or a senator from Illinois headed to Washington, for that matter.

LibraryJim

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

Yes, it is free speech. But would we be so accepting of the decision if it were for and ad put out by Planned Parenthood, or that website that advocates adultery?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

No way would they allow a pro-choice ad. No way!

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

afterall, isn’t the ad celebrating the “choice” Mrs. Tebow made?

No, it’s encouraging women to ignore the advice of their doctor, at the potential risk of their own life.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
8:59 am

Dear Tim Tebow,

I think that’s great and all that your mother didn’t abort you. I’m glad she had access to health care when she got sick when she was pregnant with you and had a supporting family and friends and that you got to be born and play football, win the Heisman Trophy and all that. Really, I do. I think that is just simply super fantastic.

But really, during the Super Bowl, I don’t want to hear about all that, actualy, I don’t really care to hear about all that at anytime during my lifetime. If I did, I would ask. If maybe you were playing in the Super Bowl and they decided to do one of those boring human interest things they do, that might be a different story. However, during the Super Bowl, I want to watch the game and I would expect you to understand.

Thanks,

Bosch

Lord Help Us

January 27th, 2010
8:59 am

By all accounts, what I see on and off the field and what I hear from people that actually know him and his family, Tebow is the REAL DEAL. A guy with his talent, character and leadership ability will make a contribution at QB (think wildcat) or somewhere else (Hines Ward-type position).

Unfortunately, Tebow is associating himself with someone who is the opposite of the REAL DEAL. Dobson is a Christian charlatan. Tebow will do himself a service by looking deeply into who and what Dobson is all about.

Dobson is a hater…I hope Tebow is better than Dobson…

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:59 am

that website that advocates adultery?

oh, do tell.

mm

January 27th, 2010
9:00 am

Typical liberal media. ;)

Bradley G

January 27th, 2010
9:00 am

Ty Webb is ABSOLUTELY right. This commercial is more pro-choice than pro-life. It’s about the mother DECIDING to have the baby rather than an abortion. Why does “pro-choice” automatically mean “Thou MUST have an abortion”? If anything, the pro-lifers should have a problem with this ad b/c it talks about a woman’s CHOICE!

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:01 am

“I support anything that helps women make the right choice…”

really??? like comprehensive sex ed? like access to effective forms of birth control (including plan b)? like emergency contraception being handed out to ALL rape victims, regardless of which hospital’s emergency room they go to???

getalife

January 27th, 2010
9:01 am

They are ruining the game with flags for good hits and now this.

Pathetic.

Geaux Saints!

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
9:02 am

usinuk,
yeah, barbara walter’s even interviewed one, and I think even included him as one of the year’s most interesting people. But back to my original point, is the pro-life side only trying to stop male fetuses from being aborted?

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
9:02 am

like emergency contraception being handed out to ALL rape victims, regardless of which hospital’s emergency room they go to?

According to Joe Lieberman, there are plenty of hospitles. them hussies can go to, just a short ride away.

anyway, stuff awaits. Later, all.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
9:03 am

Hoof,

“I can’t for the life of me understand why “pro-choice” groups are so against people not having abortions.”

Um, maybe I can help: because they aren’t.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:03 am

Hmmm…if one is pro-abortion then obviouly they would be for abortion rights. Minutia.

Hoof Hearted

January 27th, 2010
9:04 am

I haven’t seen the ad, but apparently it simply makes the case for not having an abortion. I can’t for the life of me understand why “pro-choice” groups are so against people not having abortions. I get why they’re opposed to “pro-life” groups attempting to make abortions illegal, but there’s a big difference between the two. It seems the “pro-choice” groups actually want more abortions. Whether you’re pro-choice or pro-life, you would think more people choosing not to have abortions would be a good thing.

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
9:04 am

stands for decibels,
no more than the ad for the next big horror movie is encouraging people to put on hockey masks and go on murderous rampages.

getalife

January 27th, 2010
9:04 am

Richard Holbrooke says U.S. to back Taliban reintegration.

War over.

Bubba

January 27th, 2010
9:05 am

Jay, your stance on this confirms that you are a believer and defender of the First Amendment. Living in a free society means we all must occasionally listen to things we don’t agree with. I seldom agree with what you say, but I would hope that even your fiercest critics would never try to silence you. Besides, if people don’t want to listen to the Tebow piece, there’s always the mute button.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:05 am

ty –

“But back to my original point, is the pro-life side only trying to stop male fetuses from being aborted?”

seriously. this is the best you got? c’mon … have a real debate.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
9:05 am

And wow – how ’bout that – I answered Hoof’s question before he posted it.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:05 am

The issue is that CBS has an anti-advocacy policy. Meaning that they have a policy against airing ads with a political message during the Super Bowl (and who wants to see political ads during the Super Bowl anyway?) In 2004, CBS declined to air an ad by the United Church of Christ, and they also refused to air ads by PETA and MoveOn.org.

It seems that in order to be consistent, they should decline to air Tebow’s ad as well.

Also, the ad is being backed by Focus On The Family, an evangelical organization which advocates a bigoted, narrow-minded and authoritarian worldview characterized by advocacy of school-supported prayer and intolerance of homosexuality, same-sex marriage, pre-marital sex, organized gambling and science. They also oppose sex education and promote abstinence-only education instead. Not exactly a useful organization if you ask me.

Oh, it gets better: they apparently support the “ex-gay” movement – i.e., the discredited and psychologically damaging pseudoscience of “converting” gays into heterosexuals.

nadanada

January 27th, 2010
9:06 am

I don’t know what is actually in the ad. I have not heard that any group complaining about the ad knows what is in the ad.
Knowing the story of his mother during her pregnancy with Tim, she could just say that: “I considered having an abortion but decided against it. That baby turned out to be Tim Tebow. If you are considering an abortion, before you go through with it think about the great possibilities for your baby.”
If that is the message, I don’t see how it can be labeled as “hate” or “anti-abortion, anti-women”

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
9:06 am

usinuk,
real debate? I redirect you to your 8:53 post.

jthomas

January 27th, 2010
9:06 am

One more thing regarding the PETA ad that was pulled: all indications were that PETA deliberately made their ad inappropriate for air because they got far more attention from having the ad blocked than they would have from simply airing an ad.

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
9:06 am

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
8:56 am

You haven’t seen the commercial so how do you know it’s encouraging women NOT to follow the advice of their doctor?

Good grief, if the masses would be quiet the ad would play and be gone. Few would be impactede by its message. Instead, the debate over the ad is garnering more press that the ad itself.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:07 am

getalife

January 27th, 2010
9:04 am

If ya cant beat em, re-install them. In typical Obama fashion!

GoingBroke

January 27th, 2010
9:08 am

Abortion is always going to be a touchy subject and people are very emotional about it. Nothing like a woman making a life altering decision and having to run a gauntlet of screaming people to get into a doctors office. The commercial sounds like it is tasteful and if you don’t want to watch it.. good time for a snack run.

Granny Godzilla – Interesting how when someone states fact.. it becomes crap in a liberals mind.. So.. when someone does talk “crap” to a liberal.. it must have the reverse action.. they see it as truth..

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
9:09 am

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
9:09 am

USinUK,

““I support anything that helps women make the right choice…”

really??? like comprehensive sex ed? like access to effective forms of birth control (including plan b)? like emergency contraception being handed out to ALL rape victims, regardless of which hospital’s emergency room they go to???”

Yes I do. Next…

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:11 am

ty –

“real debate? I redirect you to your 8:53 post”

which was in direct proportion to the seriousness of your “aborting only male fetuses” post.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
9:11 am

I don’t understand this fixation with the teleprompter. There is no way bush could have made it without one and his press conferences were an embarassment. Obama can actually communicate without the teleprompter, its just a matter if you agree with what he is saying.

nadanada

January 27th, 2010
9:11 am

As to why CBS is allowing the ad when previously they have not allowed advocacy ads, I don’t know. However, I think it points further to the idea that the script for the ad is a subdued PSA type document. CBS did make the comment that if other groups wanted to air “responsibly scripted” ads they would not object.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:12 am

FLD – I saw that in the news this morning … somehow, I don’t think the world is quite ready for them to be the new characters on Modern Family …

Liberals=Morons

January 27th, 2010
9:12 am

Justme, a pro-choice ad as you put it is really a pro-murder ad so why would any station want to advocate murder?? Quit kidding yourself.

Ridgerunner

January 27th, 2010
9:13 am

I disagree.

I think abortonists should have equal time to show a video of an unborn child being ripped apart in its mother’s womb ……….. interposed with linebackers doing the same thing to the quarterback in his “safe” pocket.

God help us …………………..

Hoof Hearted

January 27th, 2010
9:13 am

Mick,

I agree with you. However, did you see the Daily Show the other night? The Pres was speaking at a middle school, in a classroom, and he had his teleprompter set up. Stewart ripped him pretty good. Bush may have done the same thing; I don’t know. However, Obama should probably use it a little less.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:15 am

“I don’t understand this fixation with the teleprompter”

… when all you got is nuttin’, you get teleprompters and iPods …

(which, by the way, is a total BS story – the iPod featured the Queen’s favorite composer, Rogers and Hart, and a songbook signed by the same composers … as well as footage of HER trip to the states in 2007 … but, as the saying goes, they never let a good lie die )

LibraryJim

January 27th, 2010
9:16 am

I’ve seen Obama try to speak without a teleprompter (remember during the campaign when his teleprompter malfunctioned? He couldn’t go on until it was fixed!), and it ain’t a pretty sight. all “um”s and “uh”s, etc. and not one coherent sentence attached to the other.

Heck, even Joe Biden makes fun of Obama’s reliance on the teleprompter, as when the wind blew one over at the Air Force Academy and Biden quipped “Oh, no, it’s broken! What are we going to tell the President?”

Frank Wren

January 27th, 2010
9:16 am

he shows the good manners to proclaim his faith quietly

LOL Are you kidding me? The eyeblack?

And ask yourself this. If Tebow were Muslim and had been putting references to the Koran on his face every game would he have been allowed to do it? I doubt it. Its a shame that the very thing this country was founded on, freedom of religion, no longer exists.

Who knew a 22 year old football player was the expert on womens bodies and reproductive issues in America.

kayaker 71

January 27th, 2010
9:16 am

It is my undersstanding that the focus of the ad centers around the fact that Ms. Tebow was advised to have an abortion while pregnant because of an illness she had while carring Tim. She rejected this and went on to have a healthy boy who accomplished something that few people do. It appears that the message is that you never know what you are going to get and it would be a shame to have not had this person in the world. With 1.37M abortions peformed yearly in this country, it is nice to know that we have salvaged one or two, especially one like this guy.

@@

January 27th, 2010
9:17 am

Lest we forget, folks from the left have also been ushered to the door of this fine establishment, @@, including such illustrious names such as God Hates Trash and Public Option.

If you’ll recall, jay, I spoke out against their banning as well.

Free speech is free speech. All for one and one for all.

Having said that, you’re topic has been addressed.

Wouldn’t it be interesting to know how “People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals” felt about aborting the human species, BABIES.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:17 am

“With 1.37M abortions peformed yearly in this country, it is nice to know that we have salvaged one or two, especially one like this guy”

yep. to hell with the health of the “donor womb” …

oy.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
9:17 am

Going Broke

See you have a shiny new name. How many will you use today?
Your buddy or alter ego or whatever posted without attribution…that’s not a bright idea.

Are you going broke because we redistribted all your money?

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
9:19 am

One other thing, since it’s worth addressing:

no more than the ad for the next big horror movie is encouraging people to put on hockey masks and go on murderous rampages.

While that’s a valid enough point, it might not be a great example to warm the c0ckles of my own heart—I hate violent movie trailers, believe that such stuff probably desensitizes people to actual violence, frankly don’t want my kid exposed to them, and would be fine with some voluntary commercial TV standards being adopted that would tone them down a great deal.

And I’ll admit not having seen the ad, but, rather, I’ve just read a description of Tebow’s mom’s story; it’s possible I’ve got the advocacy message wrong. But it sure sounds as if it’s not just glorifying risking your life to save a fetus, but condemning anyone who hasn’t.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
9:19 am

Hoof Hearted

Sixth graders. A class of sixth graders. Now, some will argue that anything the President says will be taken apart and analyzed so he has to be careful. I’ll submit if that was the case here, then just maybe he needed to calibrate his message more for… 11-year olds.

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/addressing-elementary-school-children-obama-uses-teleprompter

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
9:20 am

Did anyone think that perhaps the reason CBS has chosen to air the ad is that Tim Tebow is a very popular player of a team who won 2 national titles under his leadership. The spot costs a LOT of money and CBS knows that people wanna see Tebow. Business decision through and through.

Would any of you out there really force them to cancel the ad? And what power bestowed upon our illustrious government gives them the power to do so?

If it is against CBS policy, only their shareholders can dictate that. And perhaps the NFL if they decided to axe the contract.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
9:21 am

**The Pres was speaking at a middle school, in a classroom, and he had his teleprompter set up.**

Didn’t see it, guess thats like pouring gas on the fire. Clinton had a great speaking style and could command your attention but for my money uncle ron was the best..

Ragnar Danneskjöld

January 27th, 2010
9:21 am

From what I hear about the Tebow ad – that’s right, I have not seen it either – there is no political message. The content is approximately as political as the syrupy Clydesdale advertisements. Even if a religious person says something, it does not logically follow that everything the religious person says is political. Our friends from the cult of death simply need to switch to decaf.

Bradley G

January 27th, 2010
9:21 am

USinUK – Are you really suggesting that all 1.37M abortions were done solely b/c the baby threatened the health of the “donor womb”?

Really? That isn’t even the Pro-Choice argument for…pro-choice.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
9:21 am

“I don’t understand this fixation with the teleprompter”

Simple. Always remember the First Rule of the Conned: NEVER let a good lie die

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
9:22 am

As a person who only cares about surfing and motor sports, but is a pro choice UF grad I just don’t know this morning.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:22 am

I wish the people who are anti-choice would be as concerned about the welfare of the ones who are born as they are for the ones in the womb.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:22 am

Obama makes great speeches butt “all flash and no substance” is not quite the idea for a President. Oh Im sure numerous wonderful ideas will be brought forth and Pelosie/Biden will bouncing off their fannys the entire time.

Make for great show!

Curious Observer

January 27th, 2010
9:22 am

With 1.37M abortions peformed yearly in this country, it is nice to know that we have salvaged one or two, especially one like this guy.

When I see kayaker and others advocating for increased aid to children of the poor, instead of giving us that “eliminate welfare” line, then I’ll believe in the sincerity of his message. Until then, I view most of the ad’s defenders as merely desirous of imposing their religious beliefs on everyone else.

Finn McCool

January 27th, 2010
9:22 am

We demand nudity during the half time show!

Well, ok, as long as they have another really cool E*Trade baby talking commercial. Golden pipes, shankapottamus….we really do need more of this.

Hoof Hearted

January 27th, 2010
9:23 am

Mick and Paul,

Yeah, I never should have mentioned it here. The nuts will lose it over that one.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:23 am

“welfare of the ones who are born”

Thats the job of the parents.

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
9:24 am

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
9:21 am

Uh oh, the daily “lie” posts have begun.

If you don’t think he has a fixation with a teleprompter, then please explain why he needs it to talk with 6th graders. 6TH GRADERS, for crying out loud!!

lmno

January 27th, 2010
9:25 am

Maybe they could air a commercial about a woman who choose to not have an abortion against her doctor’s reccomendation and she and the baby died. I am sure such stories exist. They could run them back to back.

The message would be clear; if your doctor advises you to abort and you don’t you will either die or your child will be a wierdo who is great at football.

Larry

January 27th, 2010
9:26 am

Where were all the Free Speech advocates when all TV ads criticizing BushCo and his war were rejected! NOTHING was ever permitted when The Moron was president. Remember when every child in America was traumatized by the sight of a partial breast during the High Holiday, Super Bowl Sunday.
T-Bone is a bible thumping, self promoting phony who has bigger plans for the future. Look for the cry-baby celebrity to run for office in FL (republican, of course) or become the star of his own TV ministry or hate radio show – depending on which opportunity provides him the biggest incentive.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:26 am

@@

it’s not a baby, it’s a zygote and it’s not a Mother, it’s a donor womb.

See? Isn’t that better? Now we shouldn’t feel at all bad about the murder of a million American citizens every year, as long as we change their name.

DirtyDawg

January 27th, 2010
9:26 am

Jenifer…what in blazes were you thinking to post such a thoughtful piece, particularly with such big words? Surely you don’t think the neanderthals around here would bother to try and read it, even if they could? And while I’m at it, geedubyabush didn’t use the teleprompter much cause he was better at making words up than reading ‘em. At the same time, unless Obama was planning to deliver some sort of ‘prepared’ message, clearly the use of one at an elementary school was, indeed, laughable.

As for the Tebow message. Sure it’s appropriate for him and his mother to deliver a message that says, in essence, ‘be careful about your ‘choice’, your baby may grow up to be like Timmy.’ At the same time, it would also be appropriate – and at least as likely from an odds standpoint – for the momma of some mass-murderer to make a spot where she says, ‘I can’t tell you how many times I’ve wished that I had ‘aborted’ my Timmy – McVeigh, that is.’

H

January 27th, 2010
9:26 am

I don’t have a problem with the substance of the ad, but this is just typical, Tebow tackiness. Some of the things Tebow does are really nice, but I don’t know anyone who does more interviews and loves to talk about all his good deeds more than Tebow: “I know I could have gone to the panhandle like most college kids, but I didn’t because I chose to go to the Phillippines to help people because I understand the importance of helping people…” Tebow clearly understands John 3:16, but does he also understand Proverbs 16:18 “Pride goes before destruction…”

dave

January 27th, 2010
9:27 am

Jay, this is that one time a year I agree with you. Tim is a fine young man and unlike most of us (me included) lives his daily life in compliance with his stated beliefs. As far as the “free speech” aspect is concerned, “what’s good for the goose, is good for the gander.”

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:27 am

“Pro-abortion sounds like an acceptable term, or should be.”

That’s essentially what “pro-choice” is, right? So stop w/ the PC non-sense…let’s call it like it is.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:27 am

“choose to not have an abortion against her doctor’s reccomendation and she and the baby died.”

OR

choose to not have an abortion against her doctor’s reccomendation and she and the baby lived. Unfortunately the baby, once grown, turned out to be such a disappointment she wished she had followed her docs reccommendation of aborting the lil basturd.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:27 am

There are many who decide that if the parents don’t do their job of feeding their children, then the children should be left to starve.

Like this guy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIXI5HNj6XE

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:28 am

ohfercryingoutloud … he didn’t use the prompter when he talked to the kids – he used it when he had his presser …

seriously, guys – you really need to let the teleprompter thing go – it makes you look desperate.

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
9:28 am

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:28 am

I think Obama is the one who needs to let the teleprompter go….at least when he’s talking to 12 year olds.

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
9:28 am

Maybe the Dixie Chicks could be called upon to put Tebow’s message to song.

Normal

January 27th, 2010
9:29 am

The message would be clear; if your doctor advises you to abort and you don’t you will either die or your child will be a wierdo who is great at football

Like Josef says…I don’t care who you are thass funny…

Ranter

January 27th, 2010
9:29 am

Let all the girls boycott the Super Bowl – what do they know about football in the first place? Anyway, shouldn’t they be in the kitchen making dips and wings for the men?

Mick

January 27th, 2010
9:29 am

**If you don’t think he has a fixation with a teleprompter, then please explain why he needs it to talk with 6th graders. 6TH GRADERS, for crying out loud!!**

Maybe when you become president the teleprompter becomes like your personal ipod. Its really not that big a deal.

@@

January 27th, 2010
9:30 am

stands for decibels:

Do you have any idea how quick many obstetricians will offer abortions. I had a friend whose ultrasound showed not one, but two soft markers for disability. The OB, without hesitation, offered her a choice. Had some innocent sounding word for the process. My friend rejected the option outright.

That child was born with no disabilities. She’s is, in fact, one of the smartest 18 month olds I’ve ever seen.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:30 am

“Maybe the Dixie Chicks could be called upon to put Tebow’s message to song.”

Pass that monitor cleaner!

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:30 am

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:27 am

Its not an issue of the child starving the issue is the parents lack of caring, responsbility, common sense. Nice spin though and excellent promotion of the Nanny-State!

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:30 am

Bradley – “USinUK – Are you really suggesting that all 1.37M abortions were done solely b/c the baby threatened the health of the “donor womb”?”

no, I’m talking about this ad in particular – in which the doctor told Tebow’s mother that her health was at risk – this ad is advocating ignoring that advice (but, then, that fits right in with the rest of the anti-choice movement that thinks they should be more involved with health decisions than doctors)

Normal

January 27th, 2010
9:30 am

H

January 27th, 2010
9:26 am

Well said!

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
9:31 am

Well, I agree with Jenifer. It is just a good thing that the Tebows did not rear a child into poverty in South Carolina.

GoingBroke

January 27th, 2010
9:31 am

Granny G..
never changed my name?? I am unable to post everyday as I travel for a what I do. When I have some free time I like to get on here and see whats the topic for the day.

Teleprompters.. Pres Obama (the liar) is a great speaker.. no doubt.. reminds me of the other great speakers.. Like Creflo Dollar… etc. The man needs a teleprompter to speak to school children and thats just kind of sad..

Food for thought.. on the news this morning the talk show hosts were talking about the economy.. one of the reporters made the comment that while Reagan faced several of the issues that Pres Obama is dealing with, he was “lucky” that the economy turned itself around. Lucky?? He cut taxes to stimulate growth.

How would you like to retire on 90% of your salary for the rest of your life? Just get a government job..

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
9:31 am

Ranter

January 27th, 2010
9:29 am

I think you’ve just smacked the hornets nest with that one.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:31 am

Larry

**T-Bone is a bible thumping, self promoting phony**

Tebo is a phony? YOu had better explain that to the multitudes of monster football players that he ran over during his years at Florida.

You seem very bitter and very full of hate. Maybe all is not lost. Instead of a young man actually standing up for what he believes, maybe Tebo will go more your style and become a rap artist and beat up a few GFs before he is found overdosed like so many American left wing icons.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:32 am

Not Jimmeh – “I think Obama is the one who needs to let the teleprompter go….at least when he’s talking to 12 year olds.”

and, again – he didn’t use it when talking to the kids – he used it for the presser.

nice try.

but desperate.

kayaker 71

January 27th, 2010
9:32 am

US in UK,

The “donor womb” and it’s health is not quite the issue. 92% of the 1.21M abortions performed in the country in 2009 (down from 1.37M) were performed for “societal reasons”, otherwise for birth control and because the child was not wanted. I will not speculate about the health of the wombs of all of these irresponsible people but will say that it seems a shame that we are destroying the equivalent of a pretty good sized American city every year, all under the label of “choice”. And we get our panties all in a wad about Michael Vick doing away with a few dogs or some Muslim fanatic trying to blow up a plane.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:32 am

“in which the doctor told Tebow’s mother that her health was at risk – this ad is advocating ignoring that advice”

Obviously it was bad advice as Tebow’s mother is still kickin’.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
9:32 am

“If you don’t think he has a fixation with a teleprompter, then please explain why he needs it to talk with 6th graders. 6TH GRADERS, for crying out loud!!”

The REAL “issue” is WHO CARES? Except for those who just HAVE to obsess over non-issues.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
9:33 am

With the new SC decision is there anything that says CBS has to accept equal advertising from opposing views of a political or social situation?

Seems networks can allow whatever commercials they choose. They only loose money by not accepting other commercials.

But this is free speech and any who disagree, well you are excercising your free speech, how dare you try to limit anyone who wishes to practice theirs?

CBS pays their bills so they get to choose how they make their money.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
9:33 am

I suppose it was inevitable that a speech issue would flip over to abortion. What’s really interesting, though, is how the blog’s split. Essentially, it’s two extremes. I’ll offer both positions are about as out of touch with most of America and are unaware, much as the Democratic establishment is after the series of events culminating in Scott Brown’s election.

Take a look at Brown’s position on abortion. In favor of current laws permitting abortion? Pretty much. Fight for a particular point but vote for the underlying bill, anyway? Yup. Against expanding to pretty much an on-demand basis. Yeah. In favor of scaling back current basic provisions? Nope. Says abortions should always be legally available? Yup.

And that’s the Republican who was elected. But there are plenty of groups whose donations and positions of power for their officials depends on no nuance, on taking an either/or all or nothing stance.

http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Scott_Brown.htm

[...] are paying.)8.  Jay Bookman of The AJC believes the anti-abortion ad that Tebow will appear in is simply free speech.  (I agree.  However, CBS has previously turned down other advocacy ads that it has deemed [...]

Normal

January 27th, 2010
9:34 am

Ranter

January 27th, 2010
9:29 am

I know you are being funny but I went to a super bowl party where the women stayed in the kitchen talking and only came out to see the commercials. The men would get up and make calls of nature or raid the kitchen. When the ads were over, the men came back for the game and the girls went back to the kitchen…gotta love it.

TGT

January 27th, 2010
9:35 am

What if this ad was to air within 30 days of an election (or whatever the McCain-Feingold limits)? Would it then be “free speech?”

Of course the answer is yes–even if it advocated voting in a particular way.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:35 am

This is where the magic wand would come in handy.

To make parents be caring and responsible.

Now where is that magic wand?

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:36 am

kayaker –

“92% of the 1.21M abortions performed in the country in 2009 (down from 1.37M) were performed for “societal reasons”, otherwise for birth control and because the child was not wanted.”

yep. that’s what we need – more unwanted kids! huzzah!! because, god knows, there are no children in the US who need homes – there are no kids lingering in foster care – there are no kids who have physical or mental impairments who are unable to find a loving home …

and, hey, let’s make sure there are MORE kids out there with single moms who can’t afford to raise them! hooray!!!

Bubba

January 27th, 2010
9:36 am

Jenifer wrote: I wish the people who are anti-choice would be as concerned about the welfare of the ones who are born as they are for the ones in the womb.

That may be the most tired argument in the anti-life arsenal. Did you ever take a logic course? If I save a 1-year-old child from being killed by her parent, does that mean I have to be concerned about what happens to her the rest of her life? Should I have just let her die?

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
9:37 am

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:32 am

Desperate? Nah.

So I guess Obama was speaking with the press in a classroom filled with students.

Nice try.

but inaccurate.

Boots

January 27th, 2010
9:37 am

I don’t really see what the problem is.

Tebow’s a nice guy, I’m sure, and if he doesn’t want to have an abortion, that’s his business.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:38 am

oh, and btw, Kayaker (and others) – I use the term “donor womb” because the woman in this situation seems to rate with you people not at all. she and her rights are secondary.

joan

January 27th, 2010
9:38 am

Eric is a joke. Why does he believe that Tebow needs to wallow in the dirt to “live” a real life. We have some seriously mentally and ethically deficient young people in our country, but Tebow isn’t one of them. Someone named Eric is.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:39 am

“If I save a 1-year-old child from being killed by her parent, does that mean I have to be concerned about what happens to her the rest of her life?”

No, you wouldn’t have to be, but I certainly would be.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:39 am

bubba – “If I save a 1-year-old child from being killed by her parent, does that mean I have to be concerned about what happens to her the rest of her life?”

actually, yes, it does. you should be concerned about the welfare of that child, the household it is in, etc., because THAT will be what shapes its future.

Ranter

January 27th, 2010
9:39 am

Normal – now that’s what I’m talking aobut!

Troglodyke

January 27th, 2010
9:40 am

I am a pro-choice atheist, and I think CBS should not be censured for running the ad. It’s all about money, in the end. And all the press given to it is just going to make everyone want to watch it…or not.

Personally, I don’t find Tebow’s story to really be a compelling reason to make the ad. Who are they trying to convert? Tebow’s mom, like another poster pointed out, had a support system to help her raise Tim, and he had many advantages (two being that he was white and athletic). I’m sure the ad does not address what poor pregnant women are supposed to do, though I’m sure that is the demographic that FoF is trying to convert.

I just find it silly that religious groups, and religious people, spend so many billions of dollars and billions of hours anguishing over the subject of abortion. Couldn’t tha money be better apent elsewhere? Aren’t their ANY OTHER CAUSES that so-called “Christians” care about? Why not spend those millions on doing things that Jesus actually preached about?

I am not for “sharing the wealth.” I am not a liberal. And it is their money to do with as they will…but it seems like SUCH a waste. Abortion will ALWAYS be around. It is NEVER going to go away, no matter how many billions are thrown at it. I hope it will always remain legal, but even if it doesn’t, it ain’t going away.

Religious people’s priorities are sometimes so screwy. What WILL make this world a better place, really? What SHOULD one be doing to make the world a better place?

Given the fact that God is the biggest abortionist of all time, and abortion is NEVER mentioned in the bible, people get so freaking worked up over it! Really, folks–the bumper sticker is trite and pat, but it’s true: If you don’t like abortion, don’t have one. IT’S NO ONE’S BUSINESS but the pregnant woman (if she’s over 18) and the contributor of the sperm (if he even cares).

Do you honestly think you are making the world a better place by preaching against abortion? How, exactly? How about preaching against homosexuality? That’s as moronic…all the money and time WASTED FOREVER on something that is NEVER going away.

Supposedly this great man named jesus saved you all, and died for you, and was this incredible human being made holy who brought salvation to you…and yet his legacy has become one huge screed against abortion and homos?

How the hell have you Xtians done that? Have you even READ your bible?

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:40 am

Jenifer

**To make parents be caring and responsible.**

Wow. That’s a hell of statement. So all the babies that were born to abusive parents should have been killed before they were born. Are you sure that is the stance you want to take? Especially considering our president’s parents dumped him onto his mother’s parents (his white grandparents).

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
9:40 am

CBS Sports Columnist Gregg Doyel said it best,

“Apparently the commercial has a beautiful, undeniable message. Tebow’s mother suffered a life-threatening infection during that pregnancy, and doctors advised her to abort the baby. She didn’t. She named him Tim. Just typing this paragraph gives me goose bumps. The commercial might just make me cry.

Still, I don’t want to see. Not during the damn Super Bowl. And I’m not complaining about the ad because it’s anti-abortion and I’m not. I’m complaining about the ad because it’s pro-politics. And I’m not.

Not on Super Sunday. If you’re a sports fan, and I am, that’s the holiest day of the year. That’s a day for five hours of football pregame shows and four hours of football game and three hours of postgame football analysis. That’s a day for football addicts to gorge themselves to the gills on football. It’s not a day to discuss abortion. For it, against it, I don’t care what you are.

On Super Sunday, I don’t care what I am. Feb. 7 is simply not the day to have that discussion.”

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
9:40 am

Another scenario for ya…

What if Tebow-mommy had died, but her son survived? Most moms I know would definitely sacrifice their life for their child. Would y’all categorize them as stupid? How would you feel if a guy came out with an ad, thanking his mom for not giving up on him even though she died in childbirth?

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
9:41 am

off topic daily de bunk at 9:31 Reagan had to RAISE taxes to turn the economy around

Curious Observer

January 27th, 2010
9:42 am

How would you like to retire on 90% of your salary for the rest of your life? Just get a government job..

Why don’t you do a little research before you spout nonsense? Under ol’ Newt’s great federal retirement system, you get 1% of the average salary for the top 3 earning years for each year you work. That means for working 30 years, your pension is roughly 30% of your average salary. Even if you worked 60 years, you would get at most 60%.

Get off the blog, go to school, and try to learn something before you try to tell the rest of us how much you know.

mom

January 27th, 2010
9:42 am

I am surprised these women’s groups are not offended by these soft-core-porn Victoria Secret ads and other scantily clad women you see in commercials…..why the offense at this? Which is the better role model for your child?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
9:42 am

Peadawg,

““Pro-abortion sounds like an acceptable term, or should be.”

That’s essentially what “pro-choice” is, right?”

No, it’s not and you are being willfully ignorant on the issue.

Ragnar Danneskjöld

January 27th, 2010
9:43 am

Dear USinUK, you will be pleased that we have a broad area in which we can agree. Just as good conservative girls are unlikely to conceive leftists, they are unlikely to abort such future potential good citizens, As loose leftist women are more likely to conceive leftists, we would all urge them to abort all of their spawn, for the future good of society. Give each faction what it wants, right?

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:43 am

Jimmeh –

“So I guess Obama was speaking with the press in a classroom filled with students.”

yes – he spoke with the press AFTER he spoke to the kids …

seriously, why is that so complicated for you

http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/slideshow/photo//100119/480/9131bc77c7534185bdbf267bb4ab8497/#photoViewer=/100119/480/04ee70e24cc148d5863b63fc00eeb816

DirtyDawg

January 27th, 2010
9:43 am

Back on the ‘teleprompter’ thingy…seems to me that your boy-George could have used one, or maybe a mic in his ear like that debate time, back on 9/11/01 while he sat there in front of a bunch of first-graders with a look of ‘I don’t know whether or ’s**t’ or go blind’…but that’s OK cause the cheer-leader was able to parlay talking like a peckerwood (must have been that private school, and Yale, and Harvard, education) and buying a pig farm so he could look ‘Texas’, only in his case it was ‘All hat and no pigs’.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:43 am

“anti-choice”

I prefer anti-abortion but use whatever term you’d like…it’s free speech.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:44 am

USinUK

**I use the term “donor womb” because the woman in this situation seems to rate with you people not at all. she and her rights are secondary.**

If her health is in danger, there shouldn’t be a hesitation for an abortion to save the mother. But to murder the child because it’s just not a good time to have a baby? Or as the conversation has now gone, because the baby won’t live in a Disneyland home?

No. The unborn baby should have the rights that are given to any minor age citizen of this country. Yes, this doesn’t hold down the surplus population, but the poorest are still having the most children and the “Idiocrasy” best and brightest are having abortions. As I have said before: is just around the corner.

KWB

January 27th, 2010
9:44 am

Aren’t you glad your mother didn’t abort you?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:44 am

Another “what if”:

What if Tebow had been a serial killer?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
9:44 am

“Would y’all categorize them as stupid?”

No.

“How would you feel if a guy came out with an ad, thanking his mom for not giving up on him even though she died in childbirth?”

The same as I do with Tebow – why does he think he needs to put an ad on TV doing this?

But in this case, it’s even more weird as his mother would be dead, so why would he spend millions to thank his deceased mother on TV except for his own self gratification which could easily and more cheaply be done by other means.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:45 am

“No, it’s not and you are being willfully ignorant on the issue.”

How is not essentially the same? Please explain you opinion.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:45 am

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:35 am

Magic Wand? mmmm…perhaps basic parenting skills might be more effective or not having a kid one isnt gonna rear properly. Those might be two helpful ideas…then again with todays society those might be a lil ole fashioned. YA…its a NannyState mentality.

Sunny Daze

January 27th, 2010
9:45 am

I too have always had a great deal of respect and admiration for Tim Tebow and the things he stands for. We need more like him. However, I do not agree with a commercial spot on such a controversial subject that is sure to aggitate many viewers. That’s not what the superbowl is about and it has no place there.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:46 am

FLD, 9:41,

Please do not post facts.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:47 am

Oh, I know. Pro-choice is more politically correct, right Bosch?

Pandora

January 27th, 2010
9:47 am

I’m all for it! I am totally against abortion. It’s WRONG because it’s MURDER!!!

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:47 am

“by these soft-core-porn Victoria Secret ads”

Soft porn? LOL…you mean modeling?

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:47 am

Ragnar told a funny at 9:43

(cuz everyone knows that conservatives NEVER have abortions … baaaahahahahahahaha … )

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
9:47 am

Peadawg,

You wrote that pro-choice is basically the same as being pro-abortion – I don’t know anyone who is pro-abortion – no one I know believes in abortion like it’s some kind of great thing. Being pro-choice is that you simply believe it to be a woman’s choice – that’s it, and to call it anything else, you are being willfully stubborn and ignorant.

kayaker 71

January 27th, 2010
9:48 am

US in UK,

You completely miss the point. The object of this whole thing is to prevent the pregnancy before it happens. The issue that is central to this whole thing is the irresponsibility of the prospective parents. If it is that easy to get an abortion, why be responsible? We can just do away with it and it’s even legal, for God’s sake. We pass legislation every year in an attempt to save lives, on the road, with product safety, through TSA and homeland security….. the list goes on and on. But we ignore the fact that under our very noses, we are allowed to commit infanticide with impunity and call it “choice”. The only instance where a mother can commit murder by killing her own child and get away with it. The lady that drowned all of her children in the bath tub in SC…… what’s the difference?

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
9:48 am

oh, and btw, Kayaker (and others) – I use the term “donor womb” because the woman in this situation seems to rate with you people not at all. she and her rights are secondary.

Well, it’s not like it’s their body being discussed. By the way, I hear the Taliban are being put back in power in Afghanistan. Some of the Taliban were invited out to Texas many years back. I think they hit it off with some of the folks they met. I’m sure they shared ideas.

Ranter

January 27th, 2010
9:48 am

Jenifer – I have a magic wand. Wanna see it?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:48 am

“not having a kid one isnt gonna rear properly.”

Thank you.

lmno

January 27th, 2010
9:49 am

The best point on this blog is the person who pointed out that by protesting this ad, it got more publicity than it would have without the protest.

If no one would have brought it up, it would be a minor topic of conversation the week after the super bowl sandwiched somewhere between “That Frito Lays Commerical was hilarious” and “I don’t know how they can even call themselves ‘The Who’ without Entwhistle or Moon”

jconservative

January 27th, 2010
9:49 am

Abortion, with some limits, is legal in the USA per the Supreme Court.
Spending $3 million on an ad seems to be a waste of money, but it will probably make the donors happy & keep fund raising going.

You know only five people need to be convinced to change the legality of abortion, five on the Court. As of the 2008 term of the court the five were not there.

Maybe the Family Council would have gotten more bang for the buck if they had taken the $3 million and opened an abortion alternative clinic, home & adoption service. As always, I would happily contribute to such an effort.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
9:49 am

Perhaps yanking these kids away from these sorry parents and putting them in an orphanage would be better? In some instances it would be the better alternative.

KWB

January 27th, 2010
9:49 am

Bosch, so you can be for it and against it at the same time?

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
9:50 am

It would be more balanced if they followed it up with a pro gay adoption add.

Sam

January 27th, 2010
9:50 am

Timmy better keep preachin’..its the only job he’s gonna have on sundays.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:50 am

Bosch, keep being PC and sugar-coating it all you want.

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
9:51 am

“What if”? really? well, tebow at least had a choice to either become a serial killer or a heisman trophy winner, and all around nice guy. And what do you know, he chose the latter. sheeesh.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
9:51 am

The bottom line is if CBS is going to open the door to Focus on Family advertising, then they are opening the door to every single political/social advertiser that has the pockets to pay…is this really what you want to be watching during the Super Bowl?

Add to the fact a great majority of the people watching will be drinking and a good portion will be in public places, GA’s gun laws (or lack thereof) mixed with the divisive political/social advertising and you have a lovely scenario of potential violence. Way to go CBS.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:52 am

kayaker –

“The object of this whole thing is to prevent the pregnancy before it happens. The issue that is central to this whole thing is the irresponsibility of the prospective parents. If it is that easy to get an abortion, why be responsible? ”

what “whole thing”??? the ad??? really??? the ad talks about the importance of birth control???

and you seem to have some kind of misconception (get it? misconception? I slay me) that birth control always works – that condoms never break, that the pill is foolproof, that IUDs work without a safety net.

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
9:52 am

Sunny Daze @ 9:45,

But consider the millions of Baptists around the nation who think drinking alcohol is sinful? (No I am not one, beer yummy!) Is that not controversial for them? Is the Super Bowl about beer? And what if Honey-Baked Ham has a commercial? Would that not offend Jews and Muslims? Yet the Super Bowl is not about ham…

Should we only have sports equipment and services commercials during the game?

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:52 am

Jenifer

**What if Tebow had been a serial killer?**

Anyone could be. Better crank up the old skull fracturing abortion tool. Looks like we have a lot of babies to kill.

TnGelding

January 27th, 2010
9:52 am

Money talks. You think that $2.5-3 million didn’t have anything to do with it? The networks should be required to run all ads that aren’t considered offensive. Tebow needs to stick to playing football. There’ll be plenty of time for advocacy once he retires.

Normal

January 27th, 2010
9:53 am

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:44 am
Another “what if”:

What if Tebow had been a serial killer?

Then he would have fit right in with the NFL…

cranky old man

January 27th, 2010
9:53 am

As far as I know, the people who want to air ads promoting “National Buy Nothing Day” (can’t remembember if that’s the precise name, but you get the idea), have yet to be allowed to buy air time on any network ever.

@@

January 27th, 2010
9:54 am

Paul:

You’ll find this interesting. I was reading about an anti-abortion rally whereby many young people were in attendance. The reporter (liberal) covering the event said that some were opposed due to religious convictions. Many were opposed because of the unsustainable tax burden they’ll be shouldering without any help from their friends (babies).

Glenn over at Wooten’s used to be offended by my reference to the unborn as a natural resource. He backed off a bit when I said they were a source of love, intellectual talent, and yes…..government revenue.

Facts are facts, and that’s one the progressives choose to ignore. Unsustainable costs.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:54 am

Jenifer

Here’s a what if: What if it is discovered that the genetic tests say that the baby is going to be gay.

Abortion?

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:54 am

Normal – did you catch my link for you downstairs???

mm

January 27th, 2010
9:54 am

burp bacharach

January 27th, 2010
9:56 am

christians are the biggest frauds this side of islamic fascists, they dream of a monotheistic society to parallel the middle east, same tune, just change the leader of the band jesus,muhammad…you say bible, i say koran…let’s call the whole thing off….

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
9:56 am

KWB,

Reading comprehension is your friend. Pro-Choice is just that – you are for a woman’s right to choose – it’s her choice. It has nothing to do with whether or not you agree or disagree with the procedure itself. See the difference now?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
9:56 am

Whacks Eloquent ,

“Should we only have sports equipment and services commercials during the game?”

It is the difference between selling a product and social editorialism.

Devildog

January 27th, 2010
9:57 am

CBS isn’t interested in messages. It’s the money . . . and they aren’t getting as much currently as they used to.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
9:58 am

Another “what if”:

What if the people who are anti-choice never have an abortion?

I don’t think anyone would have a problem with that, I know I wouldn’t.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
9:58 am

mm

They don’t need a dictionary to explain oral sex. They have their history books telling them about Bill Clinton.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
9:58 am

“Pro-Choice is just that – you are for a woman’s right to choose – it’s her choice”

Pro-abortion is just that – you are for a woman’s right to have an abortion – it’s her choice. See? No difference :)

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
9:58 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Here’s a what if: What if it is discovered that the genetic tests say that the baby is going to be gay.”

What if the baby was found by genetic tests to a predisposition of being a douche bag?

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
10:00 am

the anti-choice forced pregnancy crowd cracks me up.In the 80’s while attending UF I volunteered at a clinic to escort women past these creeps,nasty bunch mostly men.

jackyldo

January 27th, 2010
10:00 am

Tim’s mom was given a CHOICE and chose life.
My wife on the borth of the 3rd had the same CHOICE as she was told perhaps either she or the bay would not survive the pregnancy,, she choice and both are alive 30 years later and doing well.

The point is these WOMEN HAD A choice and made their CHOICE.. All other women have that same right and should continue to have it.

The Taliban makes choices for women,, why a young girl recently was raped and got pregnant, she got the lash for getting pregnant.

This is America, we are free to choose what we believe in andlive our lives. Keep it that way.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:00 am

Jenifer

I’m not sure that any unborn baby would be pro-abortion so it appears that Roe v Wade is defeated. That is unless you believe that they have absolutely no rights. Is that what you believe?

Roo Badley

January 27th, 2010
10:00 am

I am all for choice – the choice of a fetus to be born and become a human being, free to choose its path in life.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:01 am

mm – and don’t forget the TV docudrama about the Reagans and how the conservatives made that one sleep with the fishes … (also CBS)

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
10:01 am

“What if the baby was found by genetic tests to a predisposition of being a douche bag?”

we already know, keith olbermann was not aborted.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
10:01 am

He should have been prohibited from wearing those biblical references under his eyes while he was playing for Florida, which is a state institution. He seems to be a very polite and well-intentioned, if misguided, young man. I don’t care if the add runs or not.

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
10:02 am

**What if Tebow had been a serial killer?**

Psychologists call this “rationalizing”…

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:03 am

Pro-murder is just that – you are for a woman’s right to murder her kid – it’s her choice. See?

How about that one, Bosch?

“the choice of a fetus to be born and become a human being, free to choose its path in life.” AMEN!!!!!

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:03 am

jewcowboy

Question hit you pretty hard? So pro-abortion is OK unless you don’t get to decide the reasons for having an abortion.

Do you honestly think, if that test were created, that babies would not be aborted for that specific reason?

thomas

January 27th, 2010
10:04 am

Bosch, you write…
“Pro-Choice is just that – you are for a woman’s right to choose – it’s her choice. It has nothing to do with whether or not you agree or disagree with the procedure itself. See the difference now?”

So should I tell my son it is his choice to steal or not, as in my opinion that would be telling him it is ok to steal.

I only say that because i rarely if ever see any who are pro-choice preface their pro-choice statements with anything close to I disagree with the procedure but I feel it is their choice.

Do youalso agree that it should be people’s choice to kill whomever they want? I mean what if they consider the person they kill a threat to them.

Remember it is against the law to shoot someone in your yard! Even if they are breaking in your window.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
10:05 am

An open and serious question to those who would ban abortion/make it once again illegal.

What is a reasonable alternative to this problem?

I think even many of you would agree that teaching abstinence only, for example, is ludicrously ineffective.

Do you agree or disagree that providing condoms and other forms of birth control en masse, would help?

kayaker 71

January 27th, 2010
10:05 am

US in UK,

Condoms break, IUDs don’t always work, mistakes happen….. right. But I wonder how many of the 1.21M babies destroyed in this country last year were victims of the above or just plain irresponsibility. It seems to take two people to create one of these little things. it’s just too easy to do away with the mistake, all in about 15min., and then you’re free to go out and do it again. And Bozo even wanted the American taxpayer to fund this irresponsible behavior. If the Muslims destroyed a city in the US of 1.21m people, we would never stop talking about it. But it’s only a fetus. What the hell. We can always produce another one.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:05 am

“the choice of a fetus to be born and become a human being, free to choose its path in life”

like I said – “donor womb” – the woman is totally secondary …

thanks for the confirmation!

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:05 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Question hit you pretty hard? So pro-abortion is OK unless you don’t get to decide the reasons for having an abortion.”

No, the question didn’t hit me hard at all…it just struck me as something a homophobic douche bag that dreams of world without the “sin” of being gay would write.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
10:06 am

Jay,
What about my 9:57 has the post caught up in moderation?

Normal

January 27th, 2010
10:06 am

USinUK @ 0954.

Yes I got the link and replied….

USinUK,
Thanks for the link. My Dads father did something simular with his maple trees in New Hampshire. He sang Gaulic (he was French) songs to them as he set up the sap running/catching equipment. Never understood what he was singing, but it was cool. I sing to trees now, for no appearent reason…must have rubbed off…

Ragnar Danneskjöld

January 27th, 2010
10:06 am

Dear @@ @ 9:54, I think you know that I really agree with your “potential resource” theory, but just for the sake of argument, suppose we could identify a class of fetuses that are totally unlikely to ever be productive citizens, generally what we call worthless human beings, would that not mitigate in favor of executing the leftists in utero?

atlien

January 27th, 2010
10:06 am

I’m sick of the damn liberal media promoting causes like anti-abortion… Wait, what?

KWB

January 27th, 2010
10:06 am

Bosch, dang you’re brilliant…..so you’re okay with letting some mothers to CHOOSE to murder their child…..if you’re not against it, you’ve contributed to the process. By the way, I read and comprehend well. What I don’t comprehend is people who are too gutless to take a side and defend it.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
10:07 am

“Bosch, what happened to the baby’s “choice”?”

A foetus is not a baby, it is a symbiote of the woman and is totally anc completely dependent on HER willingness to continue carrying it.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:07 am

“But I wonder how many of the 1.21M babies destroyed in this country last year were victims of the above or just plain irresponsibility.”

wow – so you really want MORE irresponsible people to be parents??? mighty bold position!

and, like I said – if there were NO children in the US who needed a home, if there were NO kids in foster homes, if there were NO kids who are ill or have physical impairments, then you might have a point … but, as we all know, that simply isn’t the case.

KWB

January 27th, 2010
10:07 am

Bosch, what happened to the baby’s “choice”?

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
10:08 am

A fetus needs no other rights than that of the mother

GoingBroke

January 27th, 2010
10:08 am

sigh.. anti abortion – pro abortion – everyone is correct. It just happens to be a difference of opinion on why they are correct.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
10:09 am

Abe Lincoln was born to irresponsible parents. Grew up most of his life in poverty. (and I assure you poverty then was worse than poverty today)

Should he have been aborted to prevent the possibility of him having a rough child hood?

kayaker 71

January 27th, 2010
10:10 am

US in UK,

No, I just want the perpetrators of this act to be more responsible, use reasonable birth control devices and think about the consequences of their acts. Is that so much to ask?

KWB

January 27th, 2010
10:10 am

FrankLeeDarling, aren’t you glad your mother chose the way she did?

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
10:10 am

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
9:43 am

Who said it’s complicated? Have you, uh, er, uh, ever heard, uh, uh, Obama speak, er, er, without his uh, er, teleprompter? If W had done the same thing you libs would have popped your corks.

But perhaps you’re right. Maybe he wasn’t directing those statements to the children. Sort of like Jeremiah “Dice Clay” Wright wasn’t directing his statements to the people in the church. Maybe that’s how Obama never heard any incendiary remarks from the pulpit.

WyldByllHyltnyr

January 27th, 2010
10:10 am

This “choice” stuff is a bunch of crap. Otherwise, why don’t i have a choice to abort any of my ex-wives. A fetus, while dependant on the mother for support, is no less alive than any of my ex-wives. In fact, given the stage of development at which brainwaves become apparent, a ftus is more alive than any of my ex-wives. Current abortion law is wrongly based on a made-up right of privacy that is not present in the constitution and dated science from the 1960’s. Roe v. Wade should be overturned and remanded to the rightful place for decision, the states. I know the good people of Georgia would ban abortion and promote life.

Bubba

January 27th, 2010
10:11 am

USinUK wrote:

actually, yes, it does. you should be concerned about the welfare of that child, the household it is in, etc., because THAT will be what shapes its future.

You have fallen into my trap. Your statement sums up why liberals are so illogical.
In fact, the answer is no. I do not have to be concerned about her. If I save her life I have done a great thing. Even if I forget her the moment after I save her, I have still done a great thing. Saving her life was either a good thing or it wasn’t. What happens in the future doesn’t change the value of what has already occurred. Capiche?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
10:11 am

Can we just abort all the leeches who normally vote for someone who will give them welfare? No that is a choice I could support.

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
10:11 am

all these mothers who abort their female babies are against women’s rights.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:11 am

“FrankLeeDarling, aren’t you glad your mother chose the way she did?”

for those of us born before RvW, our mothers HAD no legal choice …

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
10:12 am

If we had decent affordable health care in America maybe less women would opt for an abortion

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:12 am

Another “what if”:

What if a 12 year old girl is raped and impregnated by her father?

Should she be forced to bear the child?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
10:13 am

Can we just abort all the leeches who normally vote for someone who will give them welfare? Now that is a choice I could support.

mike

January 27th, 2010
10:13 am

USinUK

It probably has to do with the fact that she cared more about the unborn child than herself. It is a concept that some folks have a hard time grasping. “It is by self-forgetting that one finds”.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:14 am

Jimmeh –

“Who said it’s complicated? Have you, uh, er, uh, ever heard, uh, uh, Obama speak, er, er, without his uh, er, teleprompter?”

I’d rather have someone say “uh – er” because he’s actually thinking about what he’s saying than someone who is fluently repeating bumper-sticker political rhetoric.

and, seriously, Rev. Wright??? dude … to paraphrase Alice, “desperater and desperater”

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:14 am

jewcowboy

Sounds to me like someone who supports choice until the choice hits closer to home.

But thanks for the input. When my friend asks me to work “Pride” this year (for the 5th year in a row), I’ll just tell him that because I asked a question that you didn’t like, I was branded as homophobic and won’t be able to help.

But just for fun, try pulling your head out of your **** and try addressing the question instead of attacking the poster. You might just learn something. )Doubtful).

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:15 am

“all these mothers who abort their female babies are against women’s rights.”

And all these people agianst abortion have adopted at least one child, right?

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:15 am

Bubba – “I do not have to be concerned about her. If I save her life I have done a great thing.”

yep. and your statement sums up the idiology of the right – “it’s all about me”

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
10:15 am

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:12 am

Oh wow, the hypothetical game. Try this one:

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

Nike Super-Bowl Commercial

January 27th, 2010
10:15 am

Brit Hume proselytizing Tiger Woods: Tiger there’s no salvation in Buddhism, if you want to keep it in your pants let me dunk you in the water-hazard for a proper Christian baptism….I’m saved thank-you Jesus, thank-you Brit, and most of all thank-you Nike for my new grooved irons…Amen…Ka-ching!

Paul

January 27th, 2010
10:15 am

@@ 9:54

Yeah. But much of the current arguments on each side are not based on facts – more emotion or beginning with one or two personal premises then extrapolating from there. Not a lot of the arguments are based on current law or likely legislation or court decisions.

But I suppose it’s a good way to vent. Or to feel good for one-upping one’s opponent. Makes one a better person. Just like making it to the stoplight first makes you a better driver than that other driver who can’t go as fast.

Normal

January 27th, 2010
10:15 am

Bubba…Bless your heart.

Brandon

January 27th, 2010
10:16 am

WOW, this is the first time I have read these comments on ajc. People need to get a grip. Its College Football!! Nothing more, nothing less. It appears that Florida has everything Georgia wants. A national star, national acclaim, national championships.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:16 am

mike – “It probably has to do with the fact that she cared more about the unborn child than herself.”

what is that in reference to?

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
10:16 am

jewcowboy, my post should have had a question mark attached. Sorry. but why should someone have adopted a baby to be against abortion.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
10:16 am

I say we just sterlize everyone and we don’t have to worry about this baby mess. Pro Choice = No Choice (for the unborn)

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
10:17 am

My mother did not have a CHOICE when I was conceived and if she had aborted me then I wouldn’t have much of a opinion anyway.

KWB

January 27th, 2010
10:18 am

USinUK, so you wish your mother had aborted you????

Jimmy Carter

January 27th, 2010
10:18 am

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:14 am

Simple math equation:

Obama + teleprompter = “repeating bumper-sticker political rhetoric”.

Brandon the Moron

January 27th, 2010
10:18 am

Forgive me since all I know is football……..was not perceptive enough to realize this was an article about abortion, free speech, and others.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:18 am

Jewcowboy

**And all these people agianst abortion have adopted at least one child, right?**

Is that the requirement? We have to adopt children in order to be against killing unborn babies? IS that the rule that you are setting down right now? What gives you that right. I choose not to adopt. My choice. Problem?

GoingBroke

January 27th, 2010
10:18 am

USinUK
I would rather have someone that knew what the heck he was doing than stammering period. Maybe some day that will happen here..

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:18 am

“Should she be forced to bear the child?”

Is it the child’s fault? Wow murder the kid b/c of something he/she couldn’t control?

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
10:19 am

What if the baby was found by genetic tests to a predisposition of being a douche bag?

Screen cleaner! Quick. It’s dripping off the screen.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:19 am

KWB – “USinUK, so you wish your mother had aborted you????”

as I was given up for adoption, I wish my birth mother had had a choice -

TelePrompter

January 27th, 2010
10:19 am

Big Guy is relentless…….when will I ever get a vacation. I mean 6th graders……….can’t this guy address anyone without me having to be there….Oh well at least I have a job and am not like those poor souls who have been laid off thanks to his policies.

KWB

January 27th, 2010
10:20 am

Jay, if you’re getting paid by the comment you may never have to work again!! lol

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:20 am

Jenifer

**What if a 12 year old girl is raped and impregnated by her father?**

Now you are reaching.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
10:21 am

Abortion, out of sight – out of mind. Personal choice of those involved, let God sort it out.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:22 am

Nif – yeah. that’s reaching. cuz everyone knows that never happens. oy.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:22 am

ty webb,

“but why should someone have adopted a baby to be against abortion.”

A put your money where your mouth is kinda thing. It’s easy to be for or against something, but if one wants to truly make abortion non-palatable there must be a solition to the unwanted babies and the conditions that led to an unwanted baby in the first place.

Otherwise, it’s just a bunch of hot air.

ty webb

January 27th, 2010
10:23 am

“those involved”? really? dad? fetus?

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
10:23 am

Maureen

January 27th, 2010
10:23 am

It’s a football game — why can’t the network just show funny commercials like they normally do. Bringing such controversial topics to such a fun event will not be pleasant for anyone.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
10:23 am

USinUK,

We wish she would have had a choice also. You also have that choice today…..a tall building…..the feeling of flight for about 5 seconds…….pain no more.

Brad

January 27th, 2010
10:23 am

Jay, not often do I say this, but I agree with every word! I’m glad to see you use the term “anti-abortion” becasue that is what it is, I just wish you would have used “pro-abortion” for the other side. “Choice” and “Life” have nothing to do with this debate. Conservatives aren’t anti-choice just like liberals aren’t anti-life. The issue is abortion so pro-abortion and anti-abortion are the only terms to use without distorting the point.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:23 am

ty webb

**but why should someone have adopted a baby to be against abortion.**

Give the guy a break. Jewcowboy is a very good democrat. He attacks people who offer questions that he hasn’t been trained to answer, but this “All lifers must adopt” nonsense is a well taught approach. HE can’t go beyond an answer to that crap, but he is at least trying .

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:24 am

Judging by the actions of most anti-choice people, their concern is only for those pre-birth, not after-birth.

After all, actions speak louder than words.

hmmmmmmm...........

January 27th, 2010
10:24 am

Here’s some free speech for you……..and we wonder why our state is broke? Maybe it’s some of our leaders???? Furlough days, overwhelmingly unpopular with every government employee, including teachers, professors, etc……Who all, by the way, were all hired with a mutual agreement, understanding, contract on pay……..this clown “legislator” never took his furlough days because he didn’t agree with them, and he understood he was going to make a certain amount of moeny……..(from the ajc article today):
Rep. David Lucas of Macon and Rep. Earnest “Coach” Williams of Avondale Estates said they oppose the furloughs on principle. Both said the leadership ordered the days without consulting members, who ran for the office with the expectation they would be paid a certain salary.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:24 am

ProChoice – 10:23 – awwwww … I’m feeling the love of Jeeeeebus OOZING out of that post!!!

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:24 am

This must have surely gotten overlooked, so I will repost.

Another “what if”:

What if a 12 year old girl is raped and impregnated by her father?

Should she be forced to bear the child?

GodisanAtheist

January 27th, 2010
10:25 am

If there were a merciful and omnipotent god, there wouldn’t be any abortions.

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
10:25 am

Mick,

“Abortion, out of sight – out of mind. Personal choice of those involved, let God sort it out.”

I actually agree, despite my personal feelings on it. I just don’t understand why pro-choicers are so upset about an organization that wants to influence the abortion choice. It still is up to the women, there are many of us that would like to see women choose not to get abortions because they feel it is the right choice, not because the imperial government won’t let them.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
10:26 am

USinUK,

You are still around. You have choice…..now please go execute it. It appears no one wanted you in infancy, or now.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
10:26 am

And Jenifer,

To give you a what if.

What if a 16 yr old girl has unprotected sex with numerous partners, very frequently then gets pregnant.

Has an abortion, goes back to her same old ways.

Gets Pregnant, and has another abortion.

Since her life didn’t have any consequences she then goes back to having unprotected sex again. Gets pregnant has another abortion.

Goes back to the same thing again.

How is she not using abortion as birth control?
Who knows if she aborted the fetus that would one day cure cancer?

My what if happens way more than your what if.

Being that I have only been out of college for 4 years, I assure you mine is one very often repeated.

In most cases it has nothing to do with rape or finaincial security.

It has to do with the selfishness of the mother and not wanting to take responsibility for her actions and not wanting to give up her party life style, or comfortable lifestyle.

lmno

January 27th, 2010
10:26 am

If a fetus is a baby, then when did it become one? Was it when the cells began to divide, or the moment one sperm entered the egg (even in a petrie dish) , or before the sperm entered the egg?

If its the latter, is masterbation aborting thousands of little babies down the drain?

@@

January 27th, 2010
10:27 am

Ragnar!!?!!

Tax ‘em all and they’re no longer worthless. When they begin to see the government as something other than their means to and end, they’ll turn on ‘em. The judicial system will take care of the sociopaths. Limit the number of appeals to one. Hasten due justice.

As far as assignment of worthless human beings….I’ll let that stink stick where it belongs–with Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood who said the poor and ignorant should not be allowed to breed. Ignorance begets ignorance. She was talking about African Americans. I’ll let the dems continue to support her views, not me.

eeewwwwwww

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:27 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“We have to adopt children in order to be against killing unborn babies?”

I’ve noticed that the most loud anti-abortion people also tend to be the ones who never consider adoption, are against anything that smacks of assistance to those in poverty with little or no education and are big proponents of abstinence only education…

They like to tell others what to do…but rarely do anything to make the situation better. A lot of hot air, with no solution.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
10:28 am

So jenifer do people who have adopted unwanted babies have a right then to be pro-life. Obviously they care about the baby after it is born.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:28 am

ProChoice –

yep. god’s love is just a-FLOWIN from your posts!!! I’m sure he’s so very proud.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:29 am

Brad @ 10:23 am

Well said!!!

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:29 am

Maureen,

“It’s a football game — why can’t the network just show funny commercials like they normally do. Bringing such controversial topics to such a fun event will not be pleasant for anyone.”

Perfectly said.

Normal

January 27th, 2010
10:29 am

Pro Choice,
You are getting a little too persomal here. Don’t make Jay ban you…just sayin’

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:29 am

lmno – 10:26 – according to the RC church, it is.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:30 am

USinUK, AMVet

It has to happen. Yes, fathers rape daughters. Yes women are raped, yes, sometimes the woman’s life is in danger.

Perhaps we could just start working on some sort of plan to REDUCE the numbers of babies being aborted. Perhaps we could spare more young girls the lifelong pain of knowing that they killed their child. Perhaps we could reduce the talk of supporting a multi-billion dollar abortion industry as something noble.

Maybe we could crack down on Hollywood and their incessant money grabbing efforts to sell sex to teenagers. After all, do teenagers really need to be any more “randy” than they already are?

That would be a great start.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
10:30 am

WE

No question adoption is preferable but there are many people of no conscience, no beliefs and it should be their choice as how to proceed.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
10:30 am

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
10:13 am

here here!!! *APPLAUSE*

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
10:30 am

Proudly pro-choice…..

Perhaps we just wait it out, it may turn out to be a moot point.

“Signs posted above the kitchen sink warn students not to drink from the tap because the water is tainted with nitrates, a potential carcinogen, and DBCP, a pesticide scientists say may cause male sterility.”

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555360,00.html

just sayin’

I Report (-: You Whine )-: mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!

January 27th, 2010
10:30 am

To compare the issue of taking an innocent life to the various mundane sins of the flesh is beneath contempt, just sayin…

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
10:31 am

Normal

January 27th, 2010
10:29 am

So you were appointed the blog monitor-lizard?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:31 am

“If a fetus is a baby, then when did it become one? Was it when the cells began to divide, or the moment one sperm entered the egg (even in a petrie dish) , or before the sperm entered the egg?

If its the latter, is masterbation aborting thousands of little babies down the drain?”

Definitely. You must not, I repeat, must not masturbate.

A lot of people feel that any form of birth control, other than abstinence, is abortion.

burp bacharach

January 27th, 2010
10:32 am

timmy’s mommy is going to hell, she let a pee-pee in her woo-woo out of wedlock, it says so in the bible…

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:32 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“HE can’t go beyond an answer to that crap, but he is at least trying .”

I will amend my comments to point out that homophobic douche bags shouldn’t be allowed to adopt. They should be aborted.

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
10:32 am

Define abortion. Does it encompass the use of contraceptives or morning after pills. Is it abortion if you do not even have the ability to determine whether egg and sperm have joined forces yet. By the way, are there any ads for Viagra at the superbowl.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:33 am

For some reason this keeps getting overlooked…

Another “what if”:

What if a 12 year old girl is raped and impregnated by her father?

Should she be forced to bear the child?

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:33 am

“It’s a football game — why can’t the network just show funny commercials like they normally do. Bringing such controversial topics to such a fun event will not be pleasant for anyone.”

Do you want a remote control is? Do you know how to press he up or down button to change the channel?

Normal

January 27th, 2010
10:33 am

Outhouse, unlike some here, I prefer civility. It just makes one seem more adult.

nike commercial

January 27th, 2010
10:33 am

brit hume dunks tiger in a water hazard be healed tiger and forego buddhism your now a christian go forth and judge

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:33 am

Jenifer

**Judging by the actions of most anti-choice people, their concern is only for those pre-birth, not after-birth.**

Try to find an orphanage set up by planned parenthood. Now try to find one set up by the Catholic Church.

Do you ever actually think before you type?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:34 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

I should also add that the most rabid anti-choice proponents also tend to think that gays shouldn’t be allowed to adopt…but that’s just what I’ve observed.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:35 am

“timmy’s mommy is going to hell, she let a pee-pee in her woo-woo out of wedlock, it says so in the bible…”

You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about…….

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:36 am

jewcowboy

I get it. You are incredibly bitter and angry that I dared to ask a question that you didn’t like. I won’t try to do any better. I won’t ask the questions that are easy for you. I just thought you had a little bit more spine than this.

Deal with it. Calling me names doesn’t make you look any smarter.

Curious Observer

January 27th, 2010
10:36 am

LA is over at Bob Barr’s blog, but he’s not having any fun. Seems everybody on that blog is a conservative–nobody for LA to alienate. Look for Bookman to get a pleading e-mail soon.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
10:36 am

too many posts since my last comment to keep up with the conversation, but:

thomas,

your son does have the option to steal or not to steal or kill or not to kill – it’s still HIS choice – you can guide him to the right decision, but it will always be his choice.

Calling someone who goes through with their choice to have a legal medical procedure a murderer is why I try my best to stay out of this discussion. If you’ve ever known anyone whose actually been murdered, you’d feel the same way.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:39 am

NIF – anyone stupid enough to advocate orphanages (not to mention one run by the Catholic Church) has obviously never had any kind of personal experience with them.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:39 am

jewcowboy

**I should also add that the most rabid anti-choice proponents also tend to think that gays shouldn’t be allowed to adopt…but that’s just what I’ve observed.**

Well, that explains it. Because I want the number of abortions to begin to decrease, I SHOULD be branded with anything you have ever heard about people who are against abortions.

Pathetic.

trojan man

January 27th, 2010
10:39 am

why is every sperm sacred? the virgin mary didn’t even need the baby batter….

Jake

January 27th, 2010
10:40 am

Jennifer – Kill the fatheer, abort the fetus, and provide counseling to the girl.

viagra

January 27th, 2010
10:40 am

how many of you faux christians are taking viagra at half-time?

@@

January 27th, 2010
10:41 am

Why do women have abortions? For over 15 years, those asking that question have had to rely on a 1987 study that some were concerned might have become outdated in light of the declining number of abortions and shifting abortion demographics.

Now a new study from the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), Planned Parenthood’s special research affiliate, brings our understanding of women’s abortion decisions up to date. While showing that women’s basic reasons have largely remained the same, the study presents some compelling new data that those reaching out to abortion-prone women will want to consider.

A couple of conclusions are very apparent from this data. First, those who wish to use the so-called “hard cases” of rape, incest, life of the mother, and genetic disability to argue for the necessity of abortion on demand will continue to find it difficult to make that case based on the reasons women offer for their abortions. Ninety-two percent cited what might be termed “social” or “other” reasons, rather than medical reasons or sexual assault, as the primary basis for their abortions.

There ^^^ ‘ya have it! The “social” stigma no longer exists. And the “other” reasons? Let’s say they’re financial….adoption can take care of that.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:42 am

“taking viagra at half-time”

I’m 24 so I don’t need it. Thanks for asking though.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:42 am

What could be the matter?

Another “what if”:

What if a 12 year old girl is raped and impregnated by her father?

Should she be forced to bear the child?

Mick

January 27th, 2010
10:42 am

I’ll admit its cold not to consider the life started at conception but what about collateral damage, famine, war, natural disasters and on and on. Just take some time and be thankful for your life and give it your best shot every day.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:43 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Deal with it. Calling me names doesn’t make you look any smarter.”

Asking hypothetic questions while denigrating gay people won’t make you look any homophobic. I only call you out because instead of asking your hypothetical question about something like a baby with a deformity or heart problem or genetic disease…you ask what if it’s gay. As if being gay was genetic deformation that severely impacts the quality of someone life.

It was douche bag question generated from a homophobic point of view.

Cleveland Steamer

January 27th, 2010
10:43 am

Father rapes/impregnates 12 yr old daughter? She must deliver baby for the bible says, “incest is best”

Mel

January 27th, 2010
10:44 am

I like Tebow. I admire his athletic abilities and certainly respect that he has his personal beliefs. HOWEVER… I do not need them crammed down my throat. No way would CBS air a pro-choice ad (which, incidentally, does not necessarily mean “pro-abortion”) so I think it should not air.

I do find it ironic that the basis of the ad is that his mother had a choice. She chose not to listen to the doctor.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
10:44 am

Mick – “I’ll admit its cold not to consider the life started at conception”

How do you define “life”? Because while 1 life begins at conception, 2 lives end. The lives of the egg and sperm cease to exist as separate, living cells at the moment they fuse together.

Kim

January 27th, 2010
10:44 am

I’m a gator & Tebow fan; my least favorite thing about him has always been his prosthelytizing. However, unlike the recent Citizens United decision, that is free speech. There is no secret here. CBS didn’t air the United Church of Christ’s commercial because they were cowed by the vocal, hateful minority. Despite what this vocal minority would have you believe, the great majority of America does support gays. This is not rocket science & hate is not a family value.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:44 am

USinUK

**NIF – anyone stupid enough to advocate orphanages (not to mention one run by the Catholic Church) has obviously never had any kind of personal experience with them.**

I have been in Catholic (and protestant) orphanages. Not great places for a kid to be raised. But outside the walls of those orphanages? Would you rather have the kids there, being sold into prostitution at age 9? Should all of those kids have been killed before birth?

What are the options? Do we just kill them all?

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:45 am

“Should she be forced to bear the child?”

Was it the kid’s fault that happened? Should he not have a chance at life because of this?

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
10:47 am

“Perhaps we could just start working on some sort of plan to REDUCE the numbers of babies being aborted.”

NiF, I completely agree, of course.

But again to those that would outlaw abortion, my question is…

What is a reasonable alternative to this problem?

I think even many of you would agree that teaching abstinence only, for example, is ludicrously ineffective.

Do you agree or disagree that providing condoms and other forms of birth control en masse, would help?

I am interested in hearing pragmatic and defined solutions.

Bueller? Anyone????

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
10:47 am

If the guy says yes but the gal says no, is she aborting at that point.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
10:47 am

“Should he not have a chance at life because of this?”

No, because the life, health and sanity of the girl impregnated by her father FAR outstrips any “rights” of the foetus. Always.

veritas

January 27th, 2010
10:48 am

Why is this an issue? A group has produce a commercial without objectional material (though it may represent a point of view people don’t agree with) and ARE PAYING FOR IT. What basis would CBS have for refusing to take the ad? It would be similar to refusing to sell a house to a person strictly on the base of their race.

Isn’t it ironic that people who claim to espouse “choice” now want to practice censorship limiting information on one of the choices? Thos who object are at liberty to create their own commerical (within FCC guidelines) and pony up the money to run it.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:48 am

“Was it the kid’s fault that happened? Should he not have a chance at life because of this?”

And so your answer is…what?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
10:48 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Because I want the number of abortions to begin to decrease, I SHOULD be branded with anything you have ever heard about people who are against abortions.”

First of all, it has been my observation not something I’ve overheard.

Secondly, what steps have you personally taken to ensure that all unwanted babies end up in a loving supportive home? I’m not talking about forcing women to simply have the baby…but making sure that any unwanted baby is not simply cast aside by society, but is instead raised in home with someone that wants them.

Anne

January 27th, 2010
10:48 am

That’s the thing about Tebow….he doesn’t proselytize the way most people do. He actually LIVES his faith. That being said, I’m pro-choice and don’t have a problem with the ad. It was his mother’s right to decide whether or not to take her doctor’s advice. That’s the whole point. I’m not anti or for abortion, I’m for the safe and legal choice I, as an adult, can make. By the way, this isn’t a forum to debate Tebow’s skills or lack thereof. The young man is upstanding, a good leader, a good player and his friends and teammates respect him. He’s not promoting the thug mentality of so many of our current athletes….and that is a wonderful thing to behold.

Byron Mathison Kerr

January 27th, 2010
10:49 am

To be clear, there are women who would never consider having an abortion who believe strongly in the rights of other women to make that choice for themselves, i.e., pro-choice, not pro-abortion.

The idea that just because you personally disapprove of something you must fight to make it illegal for everybody is an authoritarian concept that too often goes unchallenged in our free American society.

If CBS ultimately decides to run this anti-abortion ad, then it will be difficult for them to reject ads judged as controversial in the future. And abortion rights issues are, understandably, about as controversial as they come.

And while we are on the subject, I personally do not understand why is was considered controversial for the United Church of Christ to advertise its non-discrimination policy about allowing gay members in its own congregations?

Regardless of one’s possible prejudices toward gay people, why would that person object for us to have a welcoming place to worship God and fellowship with others? After all, gay people are … people — with the same spiritual needs as their non-gay children, family members, and friends.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:49 am

“If the guy says yes but the gal says no, is she aborting at that point.”

You’re a douche(sorry for the personal attack, Jay).

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:49 am

Well, well, well…

Another “what if”:

What if a 12 year old girl is raped and impregnated by her father?

Should she be forced to bear the child?

@@

January 27th, 2010
10:50 am

HOWEVER… I do not need them crammed down my throat.

To quote the pro-choice advocates. The govenment should not be allowed to come between a woman and her right to choose.

On the other hand, progressives DO believe the government should be allowed to come between a patient and their doctor when they support CRAMMING THE HEALTH CARE BILL DOWN OUR THROATS.

You can’t have it both ways.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:50 am

“And so your answer is…what?”

Sorry Jenifer, I thought you were smart enough to assume my answer. NO SHE SHOULDN’T MURDER(abort or whatever you wanna call it/sugar-coat it as) THE KID. Clear enough for ya?

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:51 am

Jay, Jenifer keeps posting the same thing over and over again…you wanna stop that or something?

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:52 am

@@ at 10:50…I never thought of it that way. Pro-choice people(usually democrats) want the government to control everything else. Why no the right to murder?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:52 am

“NO SHE SHOULDN’T MURDER(abort or whatever you wanna call it/sugar-coat it as) THE KID. Clear enough for ya?”

Crystal clear. Thank you.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
10:52 am

Well said, Byron

Madison Avenue

January 27th, 2010
10:52 am

who cares what Tim Tebow thinks about abortion? who cares what CBS thinks of Tim Tebow? I’d no sooner “choose” based on the musings of Tim Tebow/his mom when it comes to abortion, than I would drink a Pepsi because Britney Spears, Michael Jackson or Bob Dole said to.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

**The lives of the egg and sperm cease to exist as separate, living cells at the moment they fuse together**

They cease to exist even if they don’t create life. The embryo evolves.

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:49 am
“If the guy says yes but the gal says no, is she aborting at that point.”

You’re a douche(sorry for the personal attack, Jay).

And what are you. Just plain sorry, I suspect.

MAC

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

Has anyone even SEEN the Tebow ad they are protesting or defending? Link please if you have.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

I’m sorry…pro-abortion. Sorry about the typo!

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

“Jay, Jenifer keeps posting the same thing over and over again…you wanna stop that or something?”

Hurts all over, doesn’t it?

Paul

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

“Given what’s happening to the Democratic agenda and the Party in general, posts about Palin or abortion are a sure diversion.”

I always thought it a trite comment, but now I’m not so sure.

SQUIRREL!!!!!

Jake

January 27th, 2010
10:53 am

veritas – CBS can accept or refuse any ad they want, but your pathetic racial discrimination in housing comparison is actually against the law. Truth, maybe, intelligent, doubtful.

Kamchak

January 27th, 2010
10:54 am

Damn! I used to watch the game primarily for the ads.

Geez.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
10:54 am

Doesn’t hurt as all Jen, just annoying to someone spam a blog w/ the same thing over and over again.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
10:55 am

jewcowboy

Why are you so afraid of the question? We are all discussing hypotheticals here.

So if the doctor finds that the mother is going to abort the child because the child shows a genetic disposition to being gay, would you want those abortions outlawed? This is quickly becoming reality. Pre-birth genetic tests are very common and some doctors believe that gays have genetic markers.

I am not saying that I would ask that my spouse abort a child because of the presence of those markers, but you know as well as I do, that some . . . many people would abort that baby, specifically because of this.

Why are you so afraid to address this?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:55 am

Actually, I have the answer to my repeated question.

Oh yes I do.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
10:55 am

“Crystal clear”

Personally, I would say “brutally honest”

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
10:56 am

Keep up the good work, Jenifer.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
10:56 am

“The embryo evolves”

or doesn’t

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
10:57 am

Peadawg makes a good substitute for LA.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
10:57 am

Peadawg – It’s not murder or whatever you want to sugarcoat it. Under the current law of the land it is clearly not murder, murder is illegal, abortion is not. Is suicide murder? How about capital punishment or self-defense during a home invasion, murder, murder, murder?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
10:57 am

“Keep up the good work, Jenifer.”

I intend to. Their silence speaks volumes.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
10:58 am

NiF –

“I have been in Catholic (and protestant) orphanages. Not great places for a kid to be raised.”

then, maybe advocating for them isn’t such a hot idea.

and, again – there are currently kids who have been living in foster care their entire lives, there are kids who are institutionalized because of illness or physical problems – adopt THOSE kids first before we start adding more to the mix …

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
10:58 am

Jenifer,

“Should she be forced to bear the child?”
Need more situational data. As she is a minor, she is not legally allowed to decide for herself. If the father got away with the travesty, there is a serious conflict of interest. If the bastard is jailed, as he should be, then the choice belongs to the girl’s mother. If the mother chooses to keep the baby, it is nobody else’s business. If both parents were guilty (direct and association), then the choice goes to her appointed guardians. If there are no suitable guardians, then the girl assumably becomes the ward of the state, and at least here in Georgia abortion is not an option in such cases.

@@

January 27th, 2010
10:58 am

Peadawg:

Why no the right to murder?

For some time I’ve been of the opinion that dems are subversive in their racism. Harry Reid’s recent comments makes it all the more obvious.

But that’s just me and mine.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
10:58 am

I don’t care what policy CBS uses for accepting ads provided it is unbiased. If they are going to allow one group advocating one social position access to one of the largest viewing audiences then it should allow the other side of the same issue as well as accepting ads for other social issues. The issue and ads must be discreet and non-confrontational.

But I’m not sure the SuperBowl crowd is the right audience. The rest of the ads will be funny and creative. The overall mood is supposed to be one of rooting for your team and celebrating the victor.

But if FOTF wants to use their funds in this manner, CBS agrees to air it (provided their policy change is indeed a change that will open up this opportunity for other causes and viewpoints) then go for it.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
10:59 am

“progressives DO believe the government should be allowed to come between a patient and their doctor when they support ”

Someone needs to get their crystal ball fixed.

Whacks EIoquent

January 27th, 2010
11:00 am

Jenifer,

“Should she be forced to bear the child?”
Need more situational data. As she is a minor, she is not legally allowed to decide for herself. If the father got away with the travesty, there is a serious conflict of interest. If the jerk is jailed, as he should be, then the choice belongs to the girl’s mother. If the mother chooses to keep the baby, it is nobody else’s business. If both parents were guilty (direct and association), then the choice goes to her appointed guardians. If there are no suitable guardians, then the girl assumably becomes the ward of the state, and at least here in Georgia abortion is not an option in such cases.

Ridgerunner

January 27th, 2010
11:00 am

Just remember, as science progresses you abortionists/pro-choicers will someday be in the same category as slave owners (”how could ‘decent’ people have been so ignorant and cruel”?).

Your descendants will not be proud.

Kim

January 27th, 2010
11:00 am

Anything that can not survive on its own is called a parasite.

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
11:00 am

Damn! I used to watch the game primarily for the ads.

It seems the days of getting a rise from “Bud” “Wize” “Er” are over, don’t it.

@@

January 27th, 2010
11:01 am

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
11:01 am

Jake, I call it like it is pal. Looks like I’m in the minority when it comes to not caring what the PC babies say.

Whacks EIoquent

January 27th, 2010
11:02 am

Ridgerunner, if they follow their own advice they won’t have any descendents! hahahahaha

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
11:03 am

If I had a wife and she was raped then became pregnant and wouldnt have it aborted I would file for divorce.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:03 am

Kam – 10:54 – I’ve been to loads of Superbowl parties where people chatted and ate during the game, but fell completely silent to watch the ads …

Terry Tate, herding cats and the Monster.com (”I want to be in middle management … I want to be paid less for doing the same job”) – those were my favs

Mel

January 27th, 2010
11:04 am

And all of the responses here are *exactly* why the ad shouldn’t air… it’s too polarizing an issue. And CBS wouldn’t air an atheist ad, I can almost guarantee. So it shouldn’t air. Doesn’t matter if I agree or disagree with him or his beliefs. It just plain shouldn’t air. On a Christian station, no problem. During the Super Bowl? No.

LibraryJim

January 27th, 2010
11:04 am

QuoteAbortion, with some limits, is legal in the USA per the Supreme Court.
Spending $3 million on an ad seems to be a waste of money, but it will probably make the donors happy & keep fund raising going.endquote

You could re-word that to:

Smoking, with some limits, is legal in the USA .
Spending $3 million on an ad to make people aware of the dangers of smoking seems to be a waste of money, but it will probably make the donors happy & keep fund raising going.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:04 am

jewcowboy

**First of all, it has been my observation not something I’ve overheard.**

Ah. So you have noticed that I was homophobic before. Any specific post, or just another liberal, brainless kneejerk reaction to anyone who doesn’t walk the goose step like you?

**Secondly, what steps have you personally taken to ensure that all unwanted babies end up in a loving supportive home?**

I got that extremely thin talking point the first 9 times you offered it. I give to my church. They support orphaned children all over the world through various mission groups.

How have you contributed to the mental health of the women that have killed their own unborn babies? Oooooooopppps. that would be an actual return question to your tired and untrue talking point. Can you answer it?

Is it your responsibility?

Did you impregnate the women?

Well, I didn’t either.

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
11:04 am

“If I had a wife and she was raped then became pregnant and wouldnt have it aborted I would file for divorce.”

And make her deal w/ post-abortion stress syndrome? Way to comfort her!!!!!

Christianity is the Devils Music

January 27th, 2010
11:05 am

If you get a vasectomy, your pre- killing god’s sperm-babies, you a murderer and will go to H-E-DOUBLE HOCKEY STICKS!

Whacks EIoquent

January 27th, 2010
11:05 am

Kim @ 11:00,

“Anything that can not survive on its own is called a parasite.”

Your case for welfare?

Kim

January 27th, 2010
11:05 am

You know who is a murderer? Scott Roeder

Paul

January 27th, 2010
11:06 am

Jenifer

[[Their silence speaks volumes]]

Careful. Last time I posted that I was informed by the Progressive side it meant no one cared about what was posted.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:06 am

Bosch – haven’t you got it yet? Nothing…NOTHING…is more important that that collection of cells in the woman’s womb. NOTHING.

Tom

January 27th, 2010
11:06 am

From what I have seen of “t.v.”, what controversial subjects are NOT being shoved down our throats? T.V. shows (and thus t.v. stations) allow many issues into my home that I don’t approve of. My family cannot even watch commercials/t.v. show advertisements without being exposed to things that I don’t agree with nor do I want to explain to my young children. It seems to me that Christians are suppose to be tolerant of messages such as pro-choice, homosexuality, etc., but those with the opposing viewpoint do not have to be tolerant to mine. Maybe the real problem with the commercial is that it might change someone’s mind about abortion – again more intolerance of my view.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:06 am

Oh dear God in heaven—

Peadawg, seriously? You’d be more concerned over post-abortion stress than your wife being raped?

Redneck Convert (R--and proud of it)

January 27th, 2010
11:07 am

Well, I don’t see why @@ just don’t adopt some of these kids. I mean, she’s got a big home and she don’t work outside it any more and there’s plenty of money for her to buy new bedroom stuff and all and her girl’s already growed up. Same thing goes for the kids in orphanages.

And that goes for all the other people on here that are against abortion.

But then, that’s just me. But in your heart you know I’m Right.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:07 am

Kim

**Anything that can not survive on its own is called a parasite**

The entire Democratic Party?

That’s cold.

LibraryJim

January 27th, 2010
11:08 am

Enter your comments here

Jake

January 27th, 2010
11:08 am

Peadawg – Just saying aborting fetuses under 6 months is legal and, therefore, the appropriate and PC way of referring to the process. When you start calling that process ‘murdering babies’, you’re imposing your personal spin and beliefs on it, implying it’s heinous and immoral. By way of contrast, Jennifer keeps suggesting that forcing a 12 year old victim of incest and rape to carry the fetus to term is heinous and immoral.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:08 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Why are you so afraid to address this?”

I’m not discussing hypothetical’s here and I do not answer questions that are rooted in and proliferate homophobia. You are framing a question that makes the assumption that being gay is something that would require to be aborted. That it is something wrong…something decreases one’s quality of life. I will not lend credence to your supposition by answering it, but I will point out that it is rooted in and proliferates homophobia.

Why won’t you answer my question about what steps have you personally taken to ensure that all unwanted babies end up in a loving supportive home?

LibraryJim

January 27th, 2010
11:08 am

I saw a bumper sticker that sums up my feelings fairly well:

Pro-choice before conception
Pro-Life after conception.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:09 am

doggone – “NOTHING…is more important that that collection of cells in the woman’s womb. NOTHING”

especially not the woman, herself

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
11:09 am

One hour and NOT ONE proposed alternative to my question regarding banning abortion from those who would do so.

Hmmm…

Frequently, I get numerous unsolicited responses when making a general statement directed at no one in particular.

Now the verbose have gone strangely quiet.

I can only conclude that the most likely reason for this reticence is that they have no pragmatic alternatives…

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:09 am

Doggone,

“Bosch – haven’t you got it yet? Nothing…NOTHING…is more important that that collection of cells in the woman’s womb. NOTHING.”

Apparently not. Good lord!

UGADawg

January 27th, 2010
11:11 am

PeaDawg, I agree! Tebow is a great guy! I hope he does well in the NFL, but you’re right he was a Gator. YUCK! Go Dawgs!

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
11:12 am

I am catholic .have been since before I was born
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:12 am

“Jenifer

[[Their silence speaks volumes]]

Careful. Last time I posted that I was informed by the Progressive side it meant no one cared about what was posted.”

Definitely not the case here, with the anti-choice group.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:13 am

“I can only conclude that the most likely reason for this reticence is that they have no pragmatic alternatives”

No, they don’t. They only know what they are AGAINST, they don’t have a clue what to put in it’s place.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:13 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Any specific post, or just another liberal, brainless kneejerk reaction to anyone who doesn’t walk the goose step like you? ”

Yes, the initial post I responded too.

“I give to my church.”

So no actual hands on solutions, huh? Way to walk the talk.

“How have you contributed to the mental health of the women that have killed their own unborn babies?”

Please point out where I ever advocated abortion.

“Is it your responsibility?”

Yes, it is all of society’s responsibility to come up with solutions to replace abortion as a choice. If one truly cares about this issue more than just being morally wraithful on those who have abortions, then it is ones moral obligation to find a solution to the problems by doing more than just contributing to a church where the proceeds do nothing about the root cause, simply the after effects.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:14 am

Mel

**And CBS wouldn’t air an atheist ad,**

If I have only one life, Let me live it as a blond: Clairol hair color ad, spoken by Marylyn Monroe during the 1960s.

I only have this one life . . .

Sally Field can be seen on television as the compensated spokesperson for Roche Laboratories’ postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment medication, Boniva.

We have ads all the time that promote atheism. They are simply accepted.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:14 am

“You’d be more concerned over post-abortion stress than your wife being raped?”

let’s not forget the whole “PASS” (post abortion stress syndrome) is a myth invented by the anti-choice crowd …

“Not recognized as an official syndrome or diagnosis by the American Psychiatric Association , the American Psychological Association, or any other mainstream authority, it is a bogus affliction invented by the religious right. Those who claim its existence define it loosely as a raft of emotional problems that they say women suffer after having an abortion — nightmares, feelings of guilt, even suicidal tendencies — and compare it to post-traumatic stress disorder.”

http://www.msmagazine.com/aug01/pas.html

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
11:14 am

There are times when a retro-active abortion is the only answwer.

pat

January 27th, 2010
11:14 am

Welp, I agree with you for a change. He has the right to his ad and so does anybody else. CBS is however a private organization, it is not incumbent on them to be constitutionally fair to all, they can do what they want as a private organization, with in the law.

I also agree with Tebow, the draconian, murderous, racist (as it kills more blacks than any other demographic), disgusting practice should be done away with once and for all. I want these kids in the world; they deserve a chance to live. Killing an autonomous living human being because it’s life is inconvenient to somebody is lowest, most revolting practice in America today. It’s time to stop. There’s plenty of ways to avoid pregnancy and there are plenty of ways to deal with pregnancy other than to kill the baby.

Dawg 3/20

January 27th, 2010
11:15 am

Tebow = 2 National Titles

Head Coach Mark Richt = 0 National Titles

41-17

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:16 am

Bosch – a little more on the BS of PASS:

There is no scientific evidence of a causal relationship between abortion and poor mental health.[5][6][7] Some studies have found a statistical correlation between abortion and sadness or stress.[8] Pre-existing factors in a woman’s life, such as emotional attachment to the pregnancy, lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric illness, and conservative views on abortion increase the likelihood of experiencing negative feelings after an abortion.[8][9][10][11]

In a 1990 review, the American Psychological Association (APA) found that “severe negative reactions [after abortion] are rare and are in line with those following other normal life stresses.”[7] The APA revised and updated its findings in August 2008 to account for the accumulation of new evidence, and again concluded that termination of a first, unplanned pregnancy did not lead to an increased risk of mental health problems. The data for multiple abortions were more equivocal, as the same factors that predispose a woman to multiple unwanted pregnancies may also predispose her to mental health difficulties.[12][13] As of August 2008, the United Kingdom Royal College of Psychiatrists is also performing a systematic review of the medical literature to update their position statement on the subject.[3]

Some proposed negative psychological effects of abortion have been referred to by pro-life advocates as a separate condition called “post-abortion syndrome.” However, the existence of “post-abortion syndrome” is not recognized by any medical or psychological organization,[14] and some physicians and pro-choice advocates have argued that the effort to popularize the idea of a “post-abortion syndrome” is a tactic used by pro-life advocates for political purposes.[1][6][15][16] In response to such activism, some U.S. state legislatures have mandated that patients be told that abortion increases their risk of depression and suicide, despite the fact that such risks are not supported by the scientific literature.[17]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_and_mental_health

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:16 am

AmVet

**One hour and NOT ONE proposed alternative to my question regarding banning abortion from those who would do so.**

YOU LIE!!!!

I always wanted to do that.

I specifically addressed your point in a post to you and USinUK.

USinUK, AMVet

It has to happen. Yes, fathers rape daughters. Yes women are raped, yes, sometimes the woman’s life is in danger.

Perhaps we could just start working on some sort of plan to REDUCE the numbers of babies being aborted. Perhaps we could spare more young girls the lifelong pain of knowing that they killed their child. Perhaps we could reduce the talk of supporting a multi-billion dollar abortion industry as something noble.

Maybe we could crack down on Hollywood and their incessant money grabbing efforts to sell sex to teenagers. After all, do teenagers really need to be any more “randy” than they already are?

That would be a great start.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
11:17 am

Looks like I’m in the minority when it comes to not caring what the PC babies say.

Since you support criminalizing abortion, and since you know that those sent to jail will be anally raped, you are obviously pro-anal rape.

Why do you have to be so PC about it? Why do you have to use terms like “pro-life?”

Damn PC baby.

Bubba

January 27th, 2010
11:17 am

USinUK said:
Bubba – “I do not have to be concerned about her. If I save her life I have done a great thing.”

yep. and your statement sums up the idiology of the right – “it’s all about me”

With every answer you demonstrate your lack of depth. OK, change the pronoun to “you.” Does that make it better for you? Logic isn’t dependent on pronouns, my feeble friend.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:17 am

Outhouse GoKart,

“There are times when a retro-active abortion is the only answwer.”

Such as those who are entirely to pert and perky in the morning before I’ve had my caffeine fix.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:17 am

“Killing an autonomous living human being ”

Except that a foetus is not autonomous. It is totally, and completely dependent on the woman…and if SHE dies, the foetus also dies.

Jesus Baby-Daddy

January 27th, 2010
11:17 am

That Jesus was one sneaky sperm…

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
11:18 am

NIF, weren’t you the one claiming that PPA was a for-profit corporation the other day?

@@

January 27th, 2010
11:18 am

Redneck:

We did raise my husband’s nephew. Did try to adopt….there were age restrictions on my husband. Decided to do the next best thing….mentoring and working with handicapped kids.

I work out of the home. The school is on a field trip today. I don’t do field trips.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
11:19 am

Jay

Do you take requests?

““People talk about the potency of the health-care issue,” Brown’s top strategist, Eric Fehrnstrom, told National Review’s Robert Costa, “but from our own internal polling, the more potent issue here in Massachusetts was terrorism and the treatment of enemy combatants.” ”

This coming after AG Holder’s decision to Mirandize the Christmas Bomber after a 50-minute session with an FBI agent and a Customs official. The President’s National Security Advisor disagreed publicly. Of course, a year in, the Obama administration doesn’t even have their High Value Interrogation Group up and running.

Seems timely -

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:19 am

NIF –

“Perhaps we could just start working on some sort of plan to REDUCE the numbers of babies being aborted. Perhaps we could spare more young girls the lifelong pain of knowing that they killed their child. Perhaps we could reduce the talk of supporting a multi-billion dollar abortion industry as something noble.”

yep – comprehesive sex education, access to effective birth control (including plan b) and access to emergency contraception in EVERY hospital where a woman is treated for rape or incest.

when I hear the anti-choice crowd advocating for those things, then I’ll believe they are truly trying to reduce the number of abortions.

but, as long as they focus on movies and abstinence, then their advocacy rings hollow

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
11:20 am

just in case anyone forgot the airwaves are public property licensed to broadcasters

bulldog90

January 27th, 2010
11:21 am

Many have said that this isn’t the time and place to put an ad of this type on. People are watching a football game and should be “united” at that time. Well, I know of a lot of people who say they just watch the Super Bowl because of the ads. It’s a big deal to a lot of people. And how many times are we subjected to ads that are so close to porn, or with messages that are destructive to our society. Little kids should be able to watch the Super Bowl with their parents, along with the ads. But so many times, parents have had to turn the station when an inappropriate SB ad comes on because of it’s content. I say let the Tebows share an inspirational message this Sunday for a change. Our society is full of bad messages every day. Some of us are really getting sick and tired of it.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:22 am

“One hour and NOT ONE proposed alternative to my question regarding banning abortion from those who would do so.”

You’re correct. They have no pragmatic alternatives.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
11:22 am

USinUK

[[There is no scientific evidence of a causal relationship between abortion and poor mental health.[]]

You’re kidding? Haven’t you been reading these comments?

:-)

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:23 am

Bubba –

“With every answer you demonstrate your lack of depth. OK, change the pronoun to “you.” Does that make it better for you? Logic isn’t dependent on pronouns, my feeble friend.”

you miss the big picture and you call me shallow? now, that’s funny.

if you save the life of a child and return it to an abusive household and years of a living hell, are you still patting yourself on the back for being the sparkling person you are? you SHOULD care about what kind of environment that child is in, not just what side of the grass it happens to be on.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:23 am

USinUK,

Well, I’ve never heard of such a thing – but any woman who has an abortion or has a baby is gonna be depressed – it’s called hormones – and when those little boogers manifest themselves – it ain’t pretty.

The pro-lifers are good at blowing things out of proportion – I mean, is partial birth abortion an epidemic in this country? How about rape victims getting pregnant? They are boogey men arguments meant to flame emotions.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:23 am

@@,

“We did raise my husband’s nephew. Did try to adopt….there were age restrictions on my husband. Decided to do the next best thing….mentoring and working with handicapped kids.”

If everyone took the time to do what you do, maybe no one would ever have to argue about abortion…there would be no need.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:24 am

USinUK,

Exactly what god are you referring to? Have you met him? And exactly what form did he/she take?

Peadawg

January 27th, 2010
11:24 am

“Peadawg, seriously? You’d be more concerned over post-abortion stress than your wife being raped?”

LMAO, that’s what you got from my comment? Geeze. If I must spell it out for you…What I meant was this: She’s already dealing w/ being raped. Why not try and comfort her? Why add more stress to her; she’s already delt w/ enough.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:25 am

USinUK,

And when I hear the same pro-lifers demanding all children receive free health care and pouring money into DFACS and foster care programs, I’ll believe them too.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:25 am

Pauly (said in my best Jersey accent) – 11:22 – now, that’s funny!!

did you make the bread???

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
11:25 am

We need more pimps seeking advice from someone at an ACORN office. “Our prostitutes are having unprotected sex! What should we do?” Have you considered running for office.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:25 am

Bosch – 11:25 – RAAAAAAAMEN!!!

Palin's a Tea Party Pooper

January 27th, 2010
11:26 am

What? We gotta listen to Tebow say, “Thank you, mum, 4 not aborting me”? I guess every other mother’s son should be grateful, too. We should move Mother’s Day to Superbowl Sunday.

I miss the wardrobe malfunction. I heard the Saints have added it to their offensive game plan, sort of a Statue of Liberty gone wild play.

PS. Thanks, Mom.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:26 am

USinUK,

“when I hear the anti-choice crowd advocating for those things, then I’ll believe they are truly trying to reduce the number of abortions.

but, as long as they focus on movies and abstinence, then their advocacy rings hollow”

Very salient point.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
11:26 am

USinUK

Been gone on a business trip. Now clearing out what piled up while gone. This weekend sounds like a good time for it. It’s gonna get cold and rainy here.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
11:27 am

Outhouse GoKart

11:03 – agreed

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:28 am

USinUK,

Don’t listen to Paul – he snuck off to see the new ABBA theme park. Yes, new ABBA theme park, for real.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
11:28 am

Tom @ 11:06

I doubt this ad will change anyone’s mind. I haven’t seen it but I’m sure it will be tasteful and positive.

Other than making “news” and raising their profile, which this ad has certainly done since we are debating it here, I don’t know that this ad during the SuperBowl is likely to change any minds.

The issue of “choice” vs. “life” or “pro-abortion” vs. “anti-abortion” will continue to rage in our society. I don’t see this issue ever being settled amicably because passions are strong on both sides of the issue.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:28 am

“11:03 – agreed”

So…your marriage vows are that easily ignored? Interesting.

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
11:29 am

you know its not like people are endangered or anything

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:29 am

Paul – since I’ve been doing the low-carb thing, my focus has been soups on the cold weekends … Tom Yum Kai has become my recent fav …

good bidness trip?

Jefferson

January 27th, 2010
11:29 am

Just remember, my rights end where anothers begin and visa versa.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:29 am

“We need more pimps seeking advice from someone at an ACORN office. “Our prostitutes are having unprotected sex! What should we do?” Have you considered running for office.”

WHODATGATE! Starring James O’Keefe in all his pimply faced glory!

@@

January 27th, 2010
11:29 am

jewcowboy:

My school (private) receives its funding through tuitions and major corporations as well as local businesses. We provide scholarships (thru corporate donations) for families in need.

I’ve always thought that corporations could offer incentives (comp time) for their employees who mentor in a program that assists children. They do it for Habitat for Humanity. I can’t begin to tell you how many houses my husband has helped build on company time. I don’t think he gets comp time. His paychecks have never come up short, so I’m guessing his company pays for him to participate.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
11:30 am

NiF, so if I understand you, your proposed alternative to “What is a reasonable alternative to this problem? I think even many of you would agree that teaching abstinence only, for example, is ludicrously ineffective.” is this?

“Perhaps we could spare more young girls the lifelong pain of knowing that they killed their child. Perhaps we could reduce the talk of supporting a multi-billion dollar abortion industry as something noble. Maybe we could crack down on Hollywood and their incessant money grabbing efforts to sell sex to teenagers. After all, do teenagers really need to be any more “randy” than they already are?”

Because you sure as hell didn’t touch this one:

“Do you agree or disagree that providing condoms and other forms of birth control en masse, would help?”

I am interested in hearing PRAGMATIC solutions that actually reduce abortions, not just hyperbole and rhetoric employed as teaching abstinence only that accomplish nothing…

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:30 am

Bosch – 11:28 – considering Mamma Mia sold out at the O2 last week – AND people went in costume, I believe it!

Palin's a Tea Party Pooper

January 27th, 2010
11:30 am

Usually, when an average Joe gets in front of tv cameras, he sez, “Hi, Mom!”.

Now, I guess we can expect that same person to now add, “…and thanx 4 not aborting me.”

Hallmark Cards has to go back to the drawing board.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:30 am

Cowboy,

I think Ahmadinejad has a solution for you. Should be forthcoming here shortly.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:31 am

Maybe we can have Super Bowl ads supporting NAMBLA and Wiccans and the Klan and Fred Phelps and let’s see who else would make some great half-time entertainment sure to piss off someone? It’s about free speech and commerce right? As long as they come up with funds, put on the air during the Super Bowl.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:31 am

Bosch,

How dare you tell me how I should feel and claim to know my past.

” If you’ve ever known anyone whose actually been murdered, you’d feel the same way.”

Those are your words and to let you know, I have teammate shot and killed at a night club in Greenville SC. Dec. 3rd. 2002

And no i don’t feel the same way. Clairvoyant now are we.

Wow your hypocricy knows no bounds does it.

Treat others how you beg and whine to be treated.

BTW telling someone that it is theri choice to do this or that is condoning this or that.

BTW I NEVER accussed anyone who had an abortion of murder. I used it as an example along with theft.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:31 am

USinUK,

“Mamma Mia sold out at the O2 last week ”

That’s just wrong.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:32 am

Ridgerunner

January 27th, 2010
11:00 am

Hello there, Corporal. Are you feeling fine today?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:32 am

Pro Choice,

“I think Ahmadinejad has a solution for you. Should be forthcoming here shortly.”

What are you talking about…there are no gays in Iran.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:32 am

Jewcowboy

**Yes, the initial post I responded too.**

So I was right: just another brainless knee jerk reaction to a very benign question. You were the one that said that gays were somehow “retarded”. What if the parents simply want grandchildren and they know that a gay person will be much less likely to give them grandchildren. Seems like you are a very self-depricating gay person. Be proud of what you are, Pal. There is an element of homophobia here, but strangely enough, it is coming from you, not me.

**Yes, it is all of society’s responsibility to come up with solutions to replace abortion as a choice. If one truly cares about this issue more than just being morally wraithful on those who have abortions,**

I work at what I believe every day. I support the legislators that support a better education for our children NO MATTER WHAT THEIR RACE MIGHT BE, unlike liberals, Try not to notice the smell on that same finger that you insist on shaking at anyone who doesn’t agree with you.

**Please point out where I ever advocated abortion.**

So once again, a liberal that doesn’t have the stones to take a stance, but just can’t resist preaching at others who do take a stance. Your lack of having the intelligence or the spine to stand up for what you believe is sadly noted.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:33 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

“Your lack of having the intelligence or the spine to stand up for what you believe is sadly noted.”

As is your lack of reading comprehension.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:33 am

thomas,

Take some Xanax.

“BTW telling someone that it is theri choice to do this or that is condoning this or that.”

No, it’s not – sorry try again. Telling someone it’s their choice is telling someone it’s their choice. Condoning something would say, “it’s okay.” See? Two totally different things.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
11:34 am

Sorry, NiF, I forgot to applaud you for at least responding.

Apparently not one single solitary anti-abortionist here even has the courage to touch this subject…

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:34 am

Jewcowboy

So you are comparing a son that is proud that his Mom took a chance and gave him life to the KKK and the Men / boy love group.

Yep. You are making some reeeeealy good points today.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:35 am

“If I had a wife and she was raped then became pregnant and wouldnt have it aborted I would file for divorce.”

So when it comes to abortion, you pick and choose? Nice.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:35 am

Oh and thomas,

“Bosch,

How dare you…..”

Really? Do you need me to come fluff the pillows on your swooning couch? Dude.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:36 am

Doggone,

Then why have there been cases of people being found guilty or prosecuted for killing an unborn baby?

You know like they attacked the mother and baby died as a result. Then they prosecute the attacker for murder.

Seems like a double standard.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:36 am

Jenifer – “So when it comes to abortion, you pick and choose?”

yep. had a roommate when I first moved to DC – her parents were STAUNCH anti-choicers … until she got pregnant, then they disowned her for NOT having an abortion.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
11:36 am

**So…your marriage vows are that easily ignored? Interesting.**

What does that have to do with it?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:37 am

Drain The Swamp (NIF),

You are quite myopic aren’t you?

Social commentary is social commentary regardless of the subject matter.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:37 am

thomas – “Seems like a double standard.” you’re absolutely right – the shouldn’t be prosecuted for a double homicide.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:37 am

AmVet

I’m still an anti-abortionist. But isn’t everybody? That should be the last resort.

Anyway, I need to go buy a bed today. Long story.

Have a good one.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:38 am

Just saying Bosch,

Nobody here B*tches more like a toddler when someone claims to know what they think or their past or tells them how to think than you.

But I do forget you are different than all of us. Your rules for how other people behave do not apply to you.

Your just a rude hypocrit, nothing more nothing less.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:38 am

“Then why have there been cases of people being found guilty or prosecuted for killing an unborn baby?”

Because they destroyed something of value to the woman, that’s why.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:38 am

thomas,

“Your just a rude hypocrit, nothing more nothing less.”

Why I never! Ahhhhhhh. [As I fall on my swooning couch with the fluffy pillows with my hand over my forehead]

But I don’t tell others what they think or believe.

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
11:39 am

ABBAWORLD, wow I would never have believed it

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:39 am

Jedwcowboy

**You are quite myopic aren’t you?**

Sometimes specific questions need to be asked. Someday, I’ll find a liberal that has the stones to answer those questions.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:39 am

Bosch – 11:38 – would you care for a cool, damp cloth?

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:40 am

Doggone

**Because they destroyed something of value to the woman, that’s why.**

I appreciate your honesty. Not many liberals will admit the main reason for abortions.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:40 am

USinUK,

Then why is there no uproar over that?

Seems if the fetus doesn’t matter and has no rights it shouldn’t matter if I end its existance.

Pregnant Women of America protect your bellies!

Whacks EIoquent

January 27th, 2010
11:41 am

USinUK,

“yep. had a roommate when I first moved to DC – her parents were STAUNCH anti-choicers … until she got pregnant, then they disowned her for NOT having an abortion.”

that sucks. but I’d say she’s probably better off without hypocrites like that in her life. does she ever regret not getting the abortion?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:41 am

“yep. had a roommate when I first moved to DC – her parents were STAUNCH anti-choicers … until she got pregnant, then they disowned her for NOT having an abortion.”

I had a neighbor, very anti-choice, whose daughter became pregnant at 15. She got her to a clinic quickly.

Such hypocrisy. Why are some fetuses important, but others aren’t?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:41 am

Frank,

[As I revive myself off my swooning couch]

“ABBAWORLD, wow I would never have believed it”

Believe it!

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:41 am

Doggone,

BUT THEY WERE CHARGE WITH MURDER! NOT DAMAGING PROPERTY.

Kinda goes against what you have been saying.

How do you murder something that is not alive?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:41 am

USinUK,

Yes, I think I would like a cool, damp cloth. Thanks. I was able to revive a little for Frank, but I’m still feeling dizzy.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:43 am

” If you’ve ever known anyone whose actually been murdered, you’d feel the same way.”
-Bosch

“But I don’t tell others what they think or believe”

So now you are a hypocrit and a liar!

Or by feel the same way were you not referring to how I would think and believe? BTW without knowing a single thing about me!

Liar Liar pants on fire.

Sorry don’t have a jingle for hypocrits.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:43 am

Jenifer

** Why are some fetuses important, but others aren’t?**

See: Progressives / Social Engineering / Stalin-Mao-Goebbels / population control / pre-birth eradication

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:43 am

Bosch – 11:38 – would you like a cool cloth for your fevered brow?

thomas – “Then why is there no uproar over that?” there was – most people saw it for what it was: the adult-ification of a fetus, giving it the exact same rights as someone who is ex-utero

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:43 am

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:44 am

Jenifer –

“Why are some fetuses important, but others aren’t?”

I think a better question is: why are some women important, but others aren’t?

Immaculate Deception

January 27th, 2010
11:44 am

Everybody in the ‘hood know-Joseph and Mary were bumpin’ uglies, they practiced the rhythm method, evidently Joseph can’t dance to the beat….

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:45 am

“Not many liberals will admit the main reason for abortions.”

Well, I’m not “many liberals” – just a believer that it’s the woman’s choice, and not the business of anyone else.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:45 am

Cowboy,

Are you myopic or do not realize what Ahmadinejad will rain down on you? BTW…..are you gay by choice or do you not have any control over that? Quite pertinent question that is being posed on Prop 8 right now…..

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
11:45 am

“I think a better question is: why are some women important, but others aren’t?”

Anyone care to answer? Probably not.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:46 am

Dog One,

Are you a PETA supporter?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:46 am

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:47 am

USinUK,

There was somewhere close to the outrage as over legal abortion?

Really could you link me a few articles about that. Try to pull them from a main-stream media source.

What do you think the comparrison would be of protest and article written about abortion and about people charged for murdering a fetus.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:47 am

Doggone

**just a believer that it’s the woman’s choice, and not the business of anyone else.**

How about the baby? Any rights there?

How about the Dad? Any hope of any rights there?

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:48 am

thomas

**BUT THEY WERE CHARGE WITH MURDER! NOT DAMAGING PROPERTY.**

Wow. That’s some serious logic. It makes all the sense in the world, so expect to be ignored or attacked.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:48 am

Jenifer,

Can’t answer don’t think anyone is more important than anyone else.

Think we should all be treated equal.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:48 am

thomas,

“Or by feel the same way were you not referring to how I would think and believe? BTW without knowing a single thing about me!

Can you make that make a little more sense before I answer?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:49 am

Pro Choice,

“BTW…..are you gay by choice or do you not have any control over that? ”

With that question you infer everyone is bi-sexual and must choose their orientation. When did a straight person choose to be straight? At what point did James Dobson decide he didn’t like dick?

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:49 am

“BUT THEY WERE CHARGE WITH MURDER! NOT DAMAGING PROPERTY.”

Not my problem.

“Kinda goes against what you have been saying.”

I’m not responsible for what others say, only for what *I* say

“How do you murder something that is not alive?”

When did I ever say a foetus was not alive?

The One

January 27th, 2010
11:49 am

Jennifer,

You are not important because I say so……there you should be satisfied now.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:49 am

Drain the Swamp,

Silly you men have no rights only responsibility once the baby is born.

God catch up!

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:49 am

NiF –

“How about the baby? Any rights there? ”

No.

“How about the Dad? Any hope of any rights there?”

if the embryo can be transferred safely to his uterus for him to carry for 40 weeks, then great.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:50 am

“Are you a PETA supporter?”

Absolutely not

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
11:51 am

thomas – 11:47 – is ABC mainstream enough for you:

“Supporters of the federal bill say that it helps tighten up federal criminal code. But opponents charge that the bill is all about abortion politics and that supporters are exploiting the Peterson murder. The proposed law grants “personhood” status to a fetus, and would be the first time that federal law established individual legal rights for a fetus, separate from those enjoyed by the mother.”

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=124535&page=1

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:51 am

“Or by “feel the same” way were you not referring to how I would think and believe, if someone I knew was murdered? BTW without knowing a single thing about me!

You do remember writing that and telling me that I would feel the same way as you don’t you?

I would have stalled for more time too.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:52 am

“How about the baby? Any rights there? ”

A foetus is not a baby

“How about the Dad? Any hope of any rights there?”

No…if the father wanted any say in the pregnancy, he should be more careful about whom he impregnates.

@@

January 27th, 2010
11:52 am

Has anyone been following this court case?

Two brothers aged 10 and 11 who subjected a pair of boys to a long ordeal of torture, beating and sexual assault told police they had only stopped hitting their victims because their “arms were aching”, a court heard today.

The details are chilling. This was in the U.K. where the government provides health care. Looks like they failed everybody in this instance. How many others have they failed?

A serious case review, to be published after the trial but leaked to the BBC, concluded that Doncaster social services had missed dozens of chances to intervene with the boys’ natural family and thus prevent the attack.

Keep talking about your drug highs and how many bottles you’re finishing off. That’ll serve your cause alright.

Kelsen’s mitigation statement noted that the older brother had viewed pornographic and violent films, smoked his father’s home-grown cannabis and regularly drank vodka and cider. The court was told of a series of violent incidents involving the brothers in the two years before the attack.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:52 am

USinUK

So why would anyone ever be charged for murdering two when they kill a pregnant woman. The baby has no rights?

And you don’t believe that the man should support the child?

Bold stance.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:52 am

USinUK-

Yes 1 article of opposition. How many you think I can find on Women’s rights to abort?

Which one do you think would have more and why?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:53 am

I chose to be straight when I saw the beautiful attributes of the opposite sex. So basically your arguement boils down to “No choice on sexual orientation but choice on infantcide”. Thanks for clearing that up….You will lose your court case in California…..that’s too bad.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:54 am

thomas,

“Or by feel the same way were you not referring to how I would think and believe? BTW without knowing a single thing about me!”

Oh, you got me! You’re the man! :roll:

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
11:55 am

“I chose to be straight when I saw the beautiful attributes of the opposite sex”

So there WAS a time when you were attracted to the attributes of the same sex that you are. Not many “straight” people are willing to admit that. Congratulations on your honesty.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
11:55 am

“I think a better question is: why are some women important, but others aren’t?”

Because, its a Mans World and thats just the way it is.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:56 am

Cowboy,

Why are you even worried about abortion? Quite hypocritical of you since this is something you will never have to worry about. Whose rights are you trying to protect here? Fighting the good cause are we?

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:56 am

Just don’t whine and b*tch about it anymore like a baby is all I’m asking and was my point.

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
11:56 am

Whoa,jewcowboy that was frightening I thought I was having a flashback,move over Bosch I think I may need the couch after viewing Jc’s 11:43

I Report :-) You Whine :-( mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!

January 27th, 2010
11:57 am

Michelle Malkin sums it up:

The unmitigated chutzpah here is so blinding that I don’t just need sunglasses to protect my eyes. I need blackout curtains. Watch President Obama blame Congress for Demcare bribery and sabotage of transparency. As if Rahm and all the senior goons in the White House weren’t twisting arms and cracking heads to ensure that the deal met their boss’s timeline. As if the Cadillac tax break for unions hadn’t been hashed out at 1600 Pennsylvania.

Why should we show anything more than disrespect for this guy?

The way he lies about everything is totally disrespectful.

We can say we are being bipartisan.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
11:58 am

“No…if the father wanted any say in the pregnancy, he should be more careful about whom he impregnates.”

Really Doggone,

Thats mighty sexist of you!

Unless i missed your post about how women should be more careful and if they wanted a choice their choice was to not get pregnant.

If you have not posted it already I am sure it must be caught in moderation.

I Report :-) You Whine :-( mmm, mmmm, mmmmm!

January 27th, 2010
11:58 am

Emanuel, several Senate and House aides said, hasn’t been shy about assigning blame, either. He’s been especially critical of moderate senators, including Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), for wasting months negotiating with Republican senators, such as his friend Chuck Grassley of Iowa.

Gee, I thought Republicans didn’t have any ideas?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
11:58 am

Nice try Dog One……….opposite sex always has been more attractive. Would you consider yourself attractive to another individual?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
11:58 am

thomas,

“Just don’t whine and b*tch about it anymore”

You ain’t the boss of me.

Frank,

[Scoot, scoot] – would you like to borrow my damp cloth?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
11:59 am

Pro Choice,

“I chose to be straight when I saw the beautiful attributes of the opposite sex.”

So you liked dick before?

“So basically your arguement boils down to “No choice on sexual orientation but choice on infantcide”.

Are you saying sexual orientation is governed by the government?

“You will lose your court case in California…..that’s too bad.”

And you are on the losing side of history…that’s too bad.

pat

January 27th, 2010
11:59 am

“I think a better question is: why are some women important, but others aren’t?”

Anyone care to answer? Probably not.

I’ll answer, its a stupid question. Women in a bad spot doesn’t justify murder. It’s a human life and abortion kills it. So you agree with killing human beings or you don’t…This is not a complicated concept to grasp. If you are ok with killing folks then by all means have as many abortions as you want so long as you admit the truth.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
11:59 am

Doggone

**A foetus is not a baby**

So all you need to do is change the name. That’s convenient. So if someone kills your father, will you forgive them if they just call him another name other than human? Your standards are pretty low for allowing murder. Mine aren’t that low. It takes more than changing the name for me.

**No…if the father wanted any say in the pregnancy, he should be more careful about whom he impregnates.**

Yep. Whenever I had sex with someone new, we always had very long and detailed discussions about the idea of the woman having a baby or an abortion. See, people from my planet NEVER HAVE SEX, because that abortion talk TENDS TO KILL THE MOOD. But I’m sure you have always discussed abortion with anyone that you are about to have sex with. It’a a very common thing, just NOT ON THIS PLANET.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:00 pm

“Thats mighty sexist of you!”

Why? I would not agree that a woman has the right to insist that a man get a vasectomy, for instance. That is HIS decision. It’s his body, just as her body is HERS.

“Unless i missed your post about how women should be more careful and if they wanted a choice their choice was to not get pregnant.”

You can’t miss what I never posted.

“If you have not posted it already I am sure it must be caught in moderation.”

Again, you can’t miss what I never posted.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
12:00 pm

thomas

actually there have been statements about the scenario you have been discussing.

here’s a hint….Laci Peterson was pregnant when she went missing….

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:00 pm

Pro Choice,

“Why are you even worried about abortion?”

Yes, I’ll go back to my flower decorating and fashion design.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
12:00 pm

USinUK

Yes, very good trip. Thanks.

I’ve recently made Navy Bean soup, beef vegetable soup and cabbage soup. I’ll have to have a go at some Thai soups. Have to go out later, pick up some lemon grass.

Oh, and pity poor Bosch. He knows he wants to turn to the goodness and light of ABBA but he’s having a difficult time breaking away from the Dark Side.

FrankLeeDarling

Bosch thinks he can ride Agnetha at ABBAWorld. I keep telling him it’s an Agnetha ride, not ride Agnetha. But you know how Progressives are at understanding nuance -

ProChoice

Saw a guy wearing a PETA t-shirt the other day: “People Eating Tasty Animals.”

Report/Whine

I have it on good authority Spkr Pelosi’s buying herself a pickup truck -

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
12:01 pm

Please and thank you

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:01 pm

Ae cute Bosch, did you steal that from Malcolm in the Middle or hear it at snack this morning?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:01 pm

FrankLeeDarling,

3-D holographic bobble-headed ABBA. Nightmarish indeed.

@@

January 27th, 2010
12:02 pm

How about the way Obama WHINES AND LIES about everything? Characteristics of the ultimate narcissist!

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:02 pm

@@ – “This was in the U.K. where the government provides health care. Looks like they failed everybody in this instance. How many others have they failed”

what in the blue blazes does that case have to do with health care??? child services, yes. health care, no.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:03 pm

“Would you consider yourself attractive to another individual?”

yes

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:04 pm

pat –

“This is not a complicated concept to grasp. If you are ok with killing folks then by all means have as many abortions as you want so long as you admit the truth”

hooray! I’ll play your game – if you have no problem with the state killing people, then you should have no problem with abortion. after all, murder is murder.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:04 pm

“Bosch thinks he can ride Agnetha at ABBAWorld. I keep telling him it’s an Agnetha ride, not ride Agnetha”

Holy crap that made me laugh!

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:04 pm

Doggone,

You told me the reason charges were filed for harming or killing the fetus is because it was something important to the mother.

Are you saying that the baby cannot be important to the father?

Also you thats apples and oranges. For apples and apples it would have to be a vasectomy for men and getting ones tubes tied for women. You are talking about the ability to reproduce.

In the case of pregnancy the reproduction has already began.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
12:04 pm

OMG! I forgot snack time!

Whacks EIoquent

January 27th, 2010
12:04 pm

off-topic but…
PETA wants to replace Punxsutawney Phil with a robot…

I hereby recommend replacing all PETA members with robots!

any speck of respect I had for those loonies vanished after the whole “Sea Kittens” thing

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:05 pm

“Characteristics of the ultimate narcissist!”

Wouldn’t that cover just about everyone in public office?

Paul

January 27th, 2010
12:06 pm

@@

When I first heard this I thought the President must be kidding. But then, finding out about the topic and the group, I have to think he was serious.

Absolutely incredible –

(from ABC News) “Rep. Marion Berry, D-Ark., fears that these midterm elections are going to go the way of the 1994 midterms, when Democrats lost control of the House after a failed health care reform effort.

But, Berry told the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, the White House does not share his concerns.

“They just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ “

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
12:06 pm

jewcowboy,

Holy Crap! That made me laugh too!

Paul,

Did you see jewcowboy’s link? Holy Crap! I think that will make you laugh too!

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
12:07 pm

Re: Drain the Swamp @ 11:47

Ideally the decision should be one that is mutually agreed between the mother and the father. The father definitely has interests since it takes sperm and egg to create a fetus.

But if the two cannot come to an agreement, I can’t see the father’s interest in forcing the woman to carry the baby to term. The man knew at the time of the “fun” that in the event of pregnancy it would be the woman whose body would carry the baby to birth. In the event of a disagreement I think I have to come down on the side of the mother.

As to the interests of the baby. Well at this point it isn’t a baby by any scientific or medical definition. It is a fetus. And this is one of the biggest issues dividing those that are “choice/pro-abortion” and “anti-choice/pro-life”. The pro-life movement believes life (and its accompanying interests and rights) is formed at the time of fertilization. The other side, along a continuum, believe that life with recognized rights/interests doesn’t happen until the baby is viable outside the woman’s body all the way up to those that believe that life happens at birth.

Since these two sides come from very different perspectives, the issue of the interests/rights of the “unborn” will never be agreed.

I am always interested in understanding the position of those who support life with respect to other things that happen before birth and after birth. I fully respect those who promote life but that doesn’t stop at birth or even before. Life includes ensuring the mother/baby get appropriate pre-natal care. Life includes thinking about how we as a society ensure the young child has adequate food, shelter, medical care and love. It includes ensuring the child is set for success by having access to a safe and effective education. Life includes thinking about how we ensure everyone has access to adequate health care. Life includes thinking about whether or not society should execute in order to show that killing is wrong. Life includes thinking about how we respond both domestically and abroad about helping the hungry, homeless and sick. Life includes thinking about the consequences of our military actions in terms of killing innocent civilians.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:07 pm

Granny,

But if she was only pregnant then why call it murder?

You all have told us the fetus is not alive, so why would it matter if you end(kill) something that is not alive.

You do have to kill something that was once alive to be charged with murder right?

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
12:08 pm

USinUK

**hooray! I’ll play your game – if you have no problem with the state killing people, then you should have no problem with abortion. after all, murder is murder.**

Oh. Fun game: When you can find an unborn baby that has planned and carried out killing another person while still being in the womb, I say, drag out the Planned Parenthood tools of the trade and start sucking the brains out of the little criminal. THAT abortion, I would totally support.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:08 pm

thomas – “Yes 1 article of opposition. How many you think I can find on Women’s rights to abort?”

sorry bub, but you asked for an article and I provided you with one – you want more, may I suggest http://www.google.com. I’m not your mommy.

as for which has more – let’s see … RvW has been the law of the land for 30+ years and has developed into a cottage industry for the religious right … vs. the fetal homicide law which has been in effect for less than 10 years … yeah, I wonder which has more articles in Lexxus Nexxus …

NiF –

“So why would anyone ever be charged for murdering two when they kill a pregnant woman. The baby has no rights?”

see my discussion with thomas – I’ve already addressed this issue.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:09 pm

“So all you need to do is change the name.”

Nope, it’s not just “changing the name” – it is assigning the correct biological identity.

So if someone kills your father, will you forgive them if they just call him another name other than human?”

My father is an autonomous entity, not a symbiote of a woman’s body.

” Your standards are pretty low for allowing murder. Mine aren’t that low. It takes more than changing the name for me. ”

Foeticide is not murder.

“Yep. Whenever I had sex with someone new, we always had very long and detailed discussions about the idea of the woman having a baby or an abortion. See, people from my planet NEVER HAVE SEX, because that abortion talk TENDS TO KILL THE MOOD. But I’m sure you have always discussed abortion with anyone that you are about to have sex with. It’a a very common thing, just NOT ON THIS PLANET.”

If you were not prepared to deal with the consequences of that sex, then maybe you SHOULD have taken the time to have that discussion. Or been really, really intelligent about it and done something to make SURE that a pregnancy did not result. Your choice.

@@

January 27th, 2010
12:09 pm

jewcowboy:

NIH doesn’t provide psychological, mental health, or substance abuse counseling? That’s nice to know.

RW-(the original)

January 27th, 2010
12:10 pm

Remember that 787 billion dollar Porkulous bill Obama rammed through so that unemployment wouldn’t get to 8%? The CBO just said oops, it’s really going to be 862 billion and we already know it didn’t do jack for employment.

No wonder the blog is in yet another marathon abortion discussion.

/I now return you to your regularly scheduled programming…already in progress.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:10 pm

NiF – sorry, bub, but life is life – it’s either sacred or it isn’t.

Jefferson

January 27th, 2010
12:11 pm

So how come when Coric asks Palin, “Which Supreme Court Decisions do you disagree with” her answer was not Roe v Wade it was “lots of them?”

Hank Williams said “If you mind your own business, you won’t be minding mine”

Paul

January 27th, 2010
12:11 pm

Bosch

I saw the link (sniff). I prefer to not fill my mind with sacrilegious images mocking all things holy and true, thank you very much.

Whacks EIoquent

January 27th, 2010
12:11 pm

Paul @ 12:06,

All I can say is wow. Some serious arrogance. What does he have that Bill Clinton doesn’t?

Wait, I know…an attractive wife!

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:12 pm

“If you were not prepared to deal with the consequences of that sex, then maybe you SHOULD have taken the time to have that discussion. Or been really, really intelligent about it and done something to make SURE that a pregnancy did not result. Your choice.”

Doggone, but the woman does not have those same obligations?

NJ

January 27th, 2010
12:12 pm

Abortion, yada, yada.

Amazes me. Its a firmly MEDICAL thing. Applying RELIGIOUS principals requires allowing ALL religions there say, and in some of them, abortions is not problematic because for them, the soul does not enter the body until the seventh day.

Using a religious standard is the worse one to use.

With regard to health reform, the simple answer is that Americans are either stupid enough to listen to Republican fear tactics, or SMART enough to listen to what Obama was originally demanding. A public option. 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 percent of all polls show that decline in support for the health care plan going through Congress is in direct proportion with all public options being removed from the legislation. The fact is that the Republicans are putting a false spin on the reasons that public OPPOSES the legislation before Congress. They want a nice simple, public option, according to all the polls that ask the question. Republicans in their usual form have stopped the public from getting what it wants.

Even the most recent POST MASSACHUSSETTS Rasmussen poll the indications that this is the case are found in his poll. The public in that state overwhelmingly supports TWO aspects of the Health Reform bill before Congress:

“Creating a new national insurance exchange and requiring health insurance companies to accept applicants with pre-existing conditions.”

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform

Both the Massachussetts voters and the overall National Poll shows 70 percent of the public supports this CORE of health reform.

Drain The Swamp (NIF)

January 27th, 2010
12:12 pm

USinUK

I saw that. You told him to find proof for your point of view. THat didn’t prove anything.

**30+ years and has developed into a cottage industry for the religious right **

Cottage industry for the people who want to save the babies, a multi-billion dollar killing machine for the people who want to kill the baby. I think the baby-savers should have a bigger, better, more powerful organization.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:12 pm

“Are you saying that the baby cannot be important to the father?”

Certainly a BABY can be important to the father, even a foetus can be important to him…but the importance of the foetus to the father is never outstripped by the woman’s decisions. Her body, her decision.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:12 pm

NiF –

“You told him to find proof for your point of view. THat didn’t prove anything.”

wrong-o, my friend … HE asked ME to provide an article.

@@

January 27th, 2010
12:13 pm

Sorry, my 12:09 was intended for USUK.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:13 pm

@@,

“NIH doesn’t provide psychological, mental health, or substance abuse counseling? That’s nice to know.”

Sorry..not following. What is this in reference too?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
12:13 pm

Paul,

:-(

Would you like me to get up off the swooning couch? I’ll be more than happy to give you my space, I’m feeling better now. And Frank smells oddly of almonds and peaches.

RW-(the original)

January 27th, 2010
12:14 pm

“They just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ “

I wonder how hard they’re having to work to muzzle Billy Jeff after that crack.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:14 pm

Jay,

You making some omeny off this one today ain’t cha?

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:14 pm

–noun
Muder – noun

1. The killing of another human being UNDER CONDITIONS SPECIFICALLY COVERED IN LAW. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder).

Oops. there goes that inane argument.

Just another example for those oblivious few who simply turn a blind eye to the actual and correct meaning of words. Any words. Any time…

pat

January 27th, 2010
12:15 pm

Why can’t gay people be concerned for human life? Is it a law you have to be a strait woman to be able to have a claim to caring for human life, no.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:15 pm

@@,

Ahhh…that explains it. I thought for a moment you were asking NIH provides counseling for those who have been to ABBAWorld.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:16 pm

NiF – ” think the baby-savers should have a bigger, better, more powerful organization”

and I’m just grateful that they’re spending so much money to help the kids that are already here …

oh, oops … waitaminnit …

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:16 pm

Her body, her decision

Just to be fun.

Didn’t she give up part of that right when she voluntarily gave her body to the man as he volutarily gave his sperm to her?

Unless there is now a real crisis of women being artifically impregnated only to have an abortion?

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:16 pm

“Doggone, but the woman does not have those same obligations?”

Certainly she does, but no one has the right to choose what she will do should those choices fail, or turn out not to be right for her after all. Her body, her decision.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:17 pm

AMVET,

Scott Pederson!

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:18 pm

“Didn’t she give up part of that right when she voluntarily gave her body to the man as he volutarily gave his sperm to her?”

No

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:18 pm

pat,

“Why can’t gay people be concerned for human life? ”

Because gay people are inhuman sociopaths preying on our nations children who only care about flower arranging, home decor, pop songs and promiscuous sex with anonymous strangers.

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:18 pm

@@ – “NIH doesn’t provide psychological, mental health, or substance abuse counseling? That’s nice to know”

the first line of defense – the child welfare services – are the ones who failed these kids. no one did ANYthing to get them out of the house and away from the parents.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:18 pm

Doggone, read my 12:16 about her body.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
12:18 pm

Bosch

[[And Frank smells oddly of almonds and peaches.]]

It’s from Agnetha’s perfume.

Eat your heart out, soccer boy –

:-)

RW-(the original)

[[No wonder the blog is in yet another marathon abortion discussion.]]

As I said earlier: SQUIRREL!!!!

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:18 pm

Muder? Make that Murder in my 12:14…

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:19 pm

thomas, at 12:17,

???

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:19 pm

Doggone, do you believe in forced child support?

If so why? Its the man’s body who has to perform the work to recieve the money.

His body his choice.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:20 pm

“Doggone, do you believe in forced child support?”

Yes, because he has a human responsibility to support the children he helps create. Again, if he wanted a say in the disposition of the prenancy, he should be more careful about his partner. But that does not absolve him from ALL responsibilty for the resulting child.

Which is, BTW, a social obligation…not a biological one.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:21 pm

Amvet,

If that is the only accepted version of murder then why was Scott Pederson charged with murder of an unborn child?

Georgia Dawg

January 27th, 2010
12:21 pm

Finally I agree with you, never thought I would but Jay, you got it right this time.

Hef

January 27th, 2010
12:21 pm

I don’t have a problem with a legal advertisement.The way I see it,I can always change the channell.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:21 pm

“Didn’t she give up part of that right when she voluntarily gave her body to the man as he volutarily gave his sperm to her?”

Please refer to Internal Revenue Code: Chapter 12–Gift Tax Code §2500 and file Form 709 with your 2009 Federal Income Tax Forms.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:21 pm

thomas, how does you example countermand that definition?

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:22 pm

USinUK

January 27th, 2010
12:22 pm

I’m off to catch the 5:45 … have a good night, all!!!

getalife

January 27th, 2010
12:24 pm

Get your politics out of my football.

Don’t ruin the game with your ideology.

Who do you think you are?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:24 pm

USinUK,

Au revoir.

pat

January 27th, 2010
12:26 pm

“Muder – noun

1. The killing of another human being UNDER CONDITIONS SPECIFICALLY COVERED IN LAW. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder). ”

Oh really? So abortions are not premeditated? What are they accidental…

Riddle me this geniuses, why is Scott Petterson in prison for TWO murders when one of them was his UNBORN son? Seems under the law, a fetus is a human after all.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
12:27 pm

I guess there’s near-unanimity on Jay’s actual topic; CBS should be free to broadcast this commercial.

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
12:29 pm

almond and peaches? my guy told me it was blueberry.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
12:29 pm

Little Barry…LMAO. Perhaps they could mail it COD to Barry and he could place it on the whitehouse lawn.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/26/indonesian-officials-consider-tearing-obama-statue/
Indonesian Officials Consider Tearing Down Obama Statue

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
12:29 pm

So let’s play what if.

What if Fat Tony gets four other Supremes to overturn Roe, and you live in one of those states that re-criminalizes first trimester abortion.

What kind of penalties did you have in mind for docs and patients who conspire to commit embryocide? If you really feel this is murder, it’s gotta be at least 25-to-life, right? You gonna throw in a death penalty for mass embryocide?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:30 pm

“CBS should be free to broadcast this commercial.”

And if it does…it needs to accept all social commentary advertising from any position in the future during the Super Bowl.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
12:30 pm

it needs to accept all social commentary advertising from any position in the future during the Super Bowl.

Works for me. And maybe they should have to publicly apologize for screwing over the United Church of Christ in 2004, but I’m being a bit greedy, here.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:30 pm

OK,
Doggone, you have to respect you for picking a side. I see it as a lil double standard as you give responsibility to the father and absolve all from the mother.

That does not seem fair or just but that is your opinion.

Do you think men should be allowed to force women to have abortions?

BTW I have no problem with rape abortions, my main concern is the women who use the process as a form of birth control. Which is how abortion is used more than for health concerns or for rape victims.

Amvet,

It goes against your definition because they are charging a man with the murder of a fetus, and according to your definition a fetus is not alive. So how does one kill something that is not alive?

Jake

January 27th, 2010
12:31 pm

pat – California statute specifically addressing the murder of pregnant women, intended more as protection for pregnant women than fetuses. Of course you already pointed out it is “killing a human being under conditions specified by law”. Law dos not specifiy aborting a fetus up to six months as murdering a human being.

getalife

January 27th, 2010
12:33 pm

“Breitbart: I Pay A Salary To Man Charged In Landrieu Plot”

D’oh!

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
12:33 pm

Pat @ 12:15

I am gay and I am concerned for human life. So please don’t generalize.

My view on abortion is, if I was hypothetically involved in fathering a child, I would do everything reasonable I could to see the baby come to term including putting the child up for adoption if that was the right thing to do. I don’t know, for myself, whether I believe life happens at conception, at birth or somewhere along the journey. But I would want to encourage the birth of that child.

That said, I believe that the decision regarding carrying the baby to term needs to be left to the father and the mother. And, as per my previous post, if the father and mother cannot decide, I think I have to side with the mother.

I don’t think that my interest in human life can or should be used to prevent the father and mother from making that decision.

What I think I can do is to support programs to avoid unwanted pregnancy through age-appropriate reproductive (as opposed to sex) education, reasonable access to birth control (teenagers are going to have sex whether the abstinence-believers want to wish it away or not) family planning (planning and having the baby at the right time for the father and mother), etc.

Life goes way beyond the birth canal. I am often appalled at some, not all, “lifers” who stop at birth. Life goes is more than bringing the baby to term…………..It goes from adequate pre-natal care to a solid education to health care. It includes asking whether society should kill for the sake of showing that killing is wrong. It includes questioning when we kill innocent civilians abroad.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:34 pm

“So let’s play what if.”

What if the fetus say the scalpel coming and grabbed onto the umbilical cord…leapt out of the uterus brandishing the mothers kidneys as nun chucks incapacitating the doctor while taking the nurse present hostage? Would they send in Chuck Norris or Samuel Jackson?

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:34 pm

gotta be samuel.

He deals better with weird stuff. Chuck fights people and fetus ain’t people.

Plus samuel would have very colourful language for that case.

RW-(the original)

January 27th, 2010
12:34 pm

<a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjUwNmUwMzBmNWQ0MmY1MWVkNzVmYmM1MDUwYzkyZWM="Teleprompter Shot of the Day

For a committee meeting no less. Is the Aussie open going to be on at 9 tonight? I think I’ll go split screen and pretend Obama is sitting at center court following the action.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:35 pm

stands for decibels,

“And maybe they should have to publicly apologize for screwing over the United Church of Christ in 2004, but I’m being a bit greedy, here”

Greed is Good.

Paul

January 27th, 2010
12:35 pm

“U.S. lawmakers turn up heat on Geithner over AIG”

Just another example of how Democrats are in bed with big business –

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2718025520100127

@@

January 27th, 2010
12:36 pm

Paul:

A narcissist can find no fault in anything he does or says. They’re too self-absorbed to care.

You should drop in over at Kyle’s. He’s got a thread up “One way 2010 is different from 1994″. It provides a link to The Tea Party’s “Contract FROM America”

My point of interest comes in at #2 — Legislation shall contain no unrelated amendments.

Talk about transparency! I also like the idea of making ‘em work overtime to achieve what they want. No recesses…no passing hidden pork and then jetting off. Some of your favorites on there too.

Kyle’s a good columnist. He offers solutions and the opportunity to discuss ‘em. Some of the solutions he offers are of his own making. My attempts at posting over there are hit and miss for some reason. Frustrating!

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
12:37 pm

jewcowboy @ 12:34 –

[Spray, spray, spray.....wipe, [squeak], wipe, [squeak], wipe, wipe, wipe…..spray, spray, spray, wipe, wipe – throw towel away]

Okay.

Now, that would be a site to behold. But, I have to go with Chuck on that one.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:37 pm

CBS is a private owned business they should be allowed to accept money from whom ever they choose.

They should also be preparred to face any critics and expect them.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
12:38 pm

” see it as a lil double standard as you give responsibility to the father and absolve all from the mother.”

I never absolved the woman from responsibility…her responsibility is built in. Once she chooses to keep the pregnancy, then the responsibility is ALL hers.

“Do you think men should be allowed to force women to have abortions?”

No

“BTW I have no problem with rape abortions,”

If you are willing to allow any excptions, then like it or not, you are pro-choice.

” my main concern is the women who use the process as a form of birth control. Which is how abortion is used more than for health concerns or for rape victims.”

So what is your alternative? To enslave the woman to YOUR standards and FORCE her to carry her prenancy to term? Or it is just about being able to punish her? If you aren’t willing to force her to carry the pregnancy, then you are PRO-CHOICE, but you want the “pleasure” of ensuring she is punished for making a choice YOU don’t like.

RW-(the original)

January 27th, 2010
12:39 pm

I guess if you do that 12:34 link right the blog gods eat it.

Same picture, different source

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:39 pm

Riddle me this back Alan Dershowitz, read that which is capitalized if you can.

That you have little if any regard for, or understanding of, standard written English or, of much more grave importance, the law itself, is of no concern to me.

Perhaps you remember this little uncomfortable phrase, we are “A government of laws, not of men.” ~John Adams

Heed well, those who would play games with jurisprudence to serve your own purposes…

http://agonist.org/sean_paul_kelley/20100125/a_nation_of_laws_not_men

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
12:40 pm

“Plus samuel would have very colourful language for that case.”

I’m tired of these motherf***ing fetuses in this motherf***ing clinic thinking they can just take over any motherf***ing time!

RW-(the original)

January 27th, 2010
12:42 pm

sfb,

CBS says their new policy would allow the UCC ad.

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
12:43 pm

CBS may be a private company but the airwaves they broadcast on are publicly owned

bob

January 27th, 2010
12:44 pm

the tebow ad is pro choice you idiots. it touts the choice his mother made!

pat

January 27th, 2010
12:44 pm

Jake, the baby was unborn, he was convicted of murder for it’s death, period.

If he had driven her to an abortion clinic, killed the child there and then murdered her he would have had a single count.

He killed the mother and the child and was convicted for both as murder. You cannot be convicted of murder for anything other than killing a person, period, the end of the story… He isn’t the on;y one, there is a guy in Texas who did the same thing, and and got convicted of murder on the fetus and the mother.

Bottom, line either these convictions should be over turned, or abortion is murder. The law protects the unborn as people everywhere save for an abortion clinic….This is not difficult to figure out. The fetus doesn’t cease being human when you walk through the door of an abortion clinic…

I am sorry some people get themselves in jams due to irresponsible sex, but once a life begins, they have no right to take it.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
12:44 pm

Ref: Thomas @ 12:37

Yes they are a private company. However, they have been granted an operating license and use of limited public airwaves by us.

So while I am not in favor of over-regulation, companies that are given license use the “PUBLIC” airwaves must take into consideration the effects of their actions. Yes their advertisers pay the freight but it is we the people who give them license and access to our airwaves.

So my view is that, especially in areas that are known to be controversial, CBS needs to think very carefully about its decisions. A safer policy in my view would be not to open themselves up to this debate. But since they have they owe the tax-paying citizens who have given them this license equal access to the airwaves.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:45 pm

Doggone,

Why ask rhetorical questions and answer them on a blog?

My idea is not to enslave the woman, but it appears yours is to enslave the woman. Not trying to punish anyone either. Just worried about the amount of Nobel Prize winners, or cancer cures, aids cures, hunger cures we have aborted all in the name of a good party.

Which like it or not I have witnessed it far too often on college campuses used as a late version of birth control.

I just feel you are wrong for claiming men should be careful of their actions and accept responsibility and PUNISH him for an unwanted pregnancy. But you feel women do not need to have those same concerns, because they have a built in safety net.

That is all you are saying, that women can live carefree and have options, but men cannot.

Plain and simple.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
12:45 pm

The human race, consciously or unconsciously, is realizing overpopulation has now become more of a threat to out survival than low birth rates. The more civilized and better educated cultures perceive this more clearly and have responded in a variety of ways, attempt to control population in China, less marriage and lower birth rates in Europe and US, more legalized abortions, etc. The quantity of human life on the planet has alrady adversely effected the quality. If the trend continues it will greatly diminish the quality of life for almost all of us. Eventually, nature will correct the imbalance and we will either all consciously recognize the value in limiting the population or we will resolve it with a Book of Eli scenario.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
12:45 pm

thomas you are the ungrateful type….

you wanted to know about “uproar” and I helped you out

not so much as a thank you

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:45 pm

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
12:44 pm

So then you feel every station that has condom ads should have abstinece ads as well.

You know how to stop them, don’t watch the shows they air on.

But lets see how many people boycott watching the superbowl to prove their point.

Guess they truely don’t care for their cause. Not willing to sacrafice.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:46 pm

Granny,

Sorry, not ungrateful…..forgetful.

Its 2 different things.

But thank you

btrask3

January 27th, 2010
12:48 pm

Since our government has condoned and encouraged the genocide of over 40,000,000 babies since Roe v Wade. And Planned Parenthood (an abortion business) has consistently filled the air with misinformation, (like, your not killing a baby your only removing a zygote, or we care about a women’s “right” to choose to abort her baby.)

This commercial provides some balance to the debate. We all can see that Tebow was a zygote as the miracle of birth began, and we all know that he grew for nine months in his mothers womb. And even though some Doctors and Nurses thought abortion (killing Tebow) was a preferred option… his mother could not bare the thought of killing her baby. And it is because of her moral courage that her son Tebow lived to became what he is today.

Just think of each of the 40,000,000 children that our government has had a hand in murdering. I wonder what value each one of their lives would have had, if they were allowed to live? At least most would be productive Tax Payers and our country wouldn’t have to import undocumented immigrants to fill jobs.

Everyone (even the doctors and nurses that kill the babies) know that it is wrong… there is not one valid excuse for this atrocious behavior. I send Tebow and his mom, many, many, thanks… for having the courage to use Tebow’s example to balance the propaganda of the misguided RIGHT TO CHOOSE movement.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
12:48 pm

CBS says their new policy would allow the UCC ad.

didn’t know that, thanks–guess it’s as close to “sorry!” as I’ll get from them.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:48 pm

“Amvet, It goes against your definition…yada, yada, yada…”

Pure sophomoric rubbish, thomas.

You fail to grasp what any eight grader could easily.

IT IS NOT MY DEFINITION.

It is THE definition. So take it up with the lexicographers, not me.

As I said countless people, including most ideologues I’ve encountered, are not remotely concerned with the laws of language or of jurisprudence itself.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
12:49 pm

thomas,

“Why ask rhetorical questions and answer them on a blog?”

You might ask yourself the same thing:

“Just worried about the amount of Nobel Prize winners, or cancer cures, aids cures, hunger cures we have aborted all in the name of a good party.”

RW-(the original)

January 27th, 2010
12:50 pm

sfb,

If their policy in 2004 would have rejected both ads and their 2010 policy would accept both ads they have nothing to apologize for.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:50 pm

Jake,

so you are in favor of the way China controls population. Quite sick to tell people this is how many kids you can have.

But hey if thats what you want go for it, just don’t be surprised when people start killing their daughters to preserve the family name.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
12:51 pm

“CBS may be a private company but the airwaves they broadcast on are publicly owned.”

Damn staright, frank.

And the communists like Rush et al don’t even pay rent to the rightful owners – we the people – for the use thereof …

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
12:51 pm

And Planned Parenthood (an abortion business)

No, actually it is a non profit, and contributions to it are tax-deductible.

https://secure.ga0.org/02/pp2009

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
12:53 pm

“So then you feel every station that has condom”

Condom ads will do no good…just look at Haiti and Africa.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:53 pm

Sorry AmVet,

If the definition you used as an example is true then why and how is it possible to have a law that states murdering of an UNBORN child?

Seems to contradict your definition.

May I ask why you feel the need to insult people who have not done so to you?

Are you angry, bitter, depressed? Why such hostility.

Post traumatic stress?

There are people and medication that can assist you.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
12:53 pm

Ref: Thomas @ 12:45

In theory, yes. Obviously one is selling a product, the other an idea. I don’t know how effective ads are on selling ideas that are unrelated to consumption.

That said, aside from the fact that we all see ads in our homes that we find inappropriate (viagra, Rx ads that rather than make me want to take them scare me to death given the side effects, etc.), I don’t think the idea of advertising condoms is as controversial as the issue of abortion.

And let’s face it the SuperBowl isn’t exactly like your average soap opera, drama or comedy show. It is one of the most watched events in the world.

dougmo2

January 27th, 2010
12:53 pm

It truely amazes me that most of the women who are pro choice are the ones men really would not like to have sex with anyway.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
12:54 pm

“It truely amazes me that most of the women who are pro choice are the ones men really would not like to have sex with anyway.”

LOL…best to have sex with their mothers…

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:54 pm

Funny Rush doesn’t pay taxes Amvet?

Really do you have any proof of that, or is it more of your normal slander?

His taxes are his paying for the right.

Mr Right

January 27th, 2010
12:55 pm

The thing about it is, this ad is about doing the right thing not the wrong thing like taking a life!

Jake

January 27th, 2010
12:55 pm

pat – Due to public pressure after the Keeler case California law was amended to say murder could only apply to a fetus after seven weeks. Not only is that California law, but it does not define aborting that same fetus as murder. My belief is that the rights of the living mother should have precedence over the rights of the unborn fetus, a position the supreme court agreed with by a 7-2 margin, and that our society as a whole is better off without all those unwanted children.

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
12:57 pm

If CBS has changed their policy and says it UCC ad would be fine, I have no problem with their showing it. So long as the UCC pays for the ad time like everyone else…

Sick&Tired

January 27th, 2010
12:57 pm

dougmo2

January 27th, 2010
12:53 pm
It truely amazes me that most of the women who are pro choice are the ones men really would not like to have sex with anyway.

If that statement were true – the percentage of abortions would be down and practically non-existent. It’s obvious that men don’t care who they sleep with or who is going to be the mother of their children.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
12:57 pm

We all would appreciate CBS running commericals/ads of opening and closing times for Atlanta Metro Adult Entertainment industry.

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
12:57 pm

Amvet I would love to see those guys be made to balance their act.
or better yet be held accountable for vandalizing public property.

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:57 pm

Jake,

maybe we would be better off had they not been aborted.

Seems cancer still has no cure, hunger still ravages the world, aids still kills.

Who knows maybe one of the aborted could have found a cure?

thomas

January 27th, 2010
12:59 pm

Swede,

Condoms are very controversial to many catholics, who are oppossed to any form of contraception.

Do their feelings not matter?

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
1:00 pm

thomas,

Conjecture much?

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
1:01 pm

Sorry thomas. Mea culpa.

“If the definition you used as an example is true..”

IF it is true???

It is true.

You parse but will not countermand the experts who define these words. So you question me instead.

You parse but will not countermand the experts who make the laws. So you question me instead.

Unaccusingly, I’d say this a fool’s errand, wouldn’t you?

Abortion is not murder. Not in America. Not in 2010.

Quit trying to shoot the messenger…

Jake

January 27th, 2010
1:02 pm

thomas – China’s plan is an obvious failure, the populations gone from 1B to 1.2B while it’s been in place. And I said nothing about supporting it. I prefer intelligent people make conscious decisions to improve the QUALITY of everyone’s life rather than breed to the point of war, pestilence, and starvation.

getalife

January 27th, 2010
1:03 pm

#
“Obama to push Hill on foreign cash
By KENNETH P. VOGEL | 1/27/10 8:52 AM

He’ll use his SOTU speech to ask lawmakers to curb campaign donations from abroad.”

Does anybody else see something wrong with this insanity?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
1:03 pm

Cowboy,

Wrong side of history eh? I think not….can’t recall being castigated for the choice I have made? Yourself?

FrankLeeDarling

January 27th, 2010
1:05 pm

thats not how it works thomas rush’s taxes in no way give him the right to be on the air the FCC license that wabe owns does.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
1:06 pm

So… anyone? appropriate jail time for embryocide?

Since some of you seem to feel so strongly about it, I figured you’d have thought this out a little bit. No?

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
1:06 pm

“My idea is not to enslave the woman, but it appears yours is to enslave the woman.”

How do you work that one out? That’s some convoluted thinking. I leave the choice up to her and I’m ENSLAVING her? I don’t think so.

” Not trying to punish anyone either. Just worried about the amount of Nobel Prize winners, or cancer cures, aids cures, hunger cures we have aborted all in the name of a good party.”

Then give us YOUR workable alternative. What is YOUR decision for a woman who chooses not to continue her pregnancy?

“Which like it or not I have witnessed it far too often on college campuses used as a late version of birth control.”

But that is not your problem. It’s the woman’s body, it’s her decision.

“I just feel you are wrong for claiming men should be careful of their actions and accept responsibility and PUNISH him for an unwanted pregnancy.”

I said it was a social responsibility, not a biological one. It would be perfectly possible to have a society dedicated to the proper raising and nurturing of children at the public expense, and then men could have all the fun they like, father all the children they like, and their responsibility to those children would be the same as everyone elses: they would contribute, via taxes, to the support of those children.

But that is not how OUR society is structured, and if the father wants the fun of creating a child…then he should be prepared for the responsibility of raising it also, even if the only responsibility he accepts is to provide the funds needed.

“But you feel women do not need to have those same concerns, because they have a built in safety net.”

Well, if the woman chooses to end the pregnancy…then that also ends the man’s responsibility.

That is all you are saying, that women can live carefree and have options, but men cannot.

Plain and simple

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:07 pm

well…maybe condom ads like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHLqwl7_lQ

As a matter of fact that is one of the most effective ads I’ve seen for anything.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
1:07 pm

Jake,

You must be omnipotent…..please decide for us who is intelligent and can improve others quality of life. Maybe we could have you run for public office on the promise to sterilize all unwanted people and mentally unstable. I think they had a particular party in Germany at one point that would support that view for you.

Jefferson

January 27th, 2010
1:07 pm

When it was against the law, it didn’t stop. Those with money just went out of country, those without went to backrooms and alleys. A person can only worry so much about what they cannot control, that’s what we have courts for. What’s right for me, might not be right for you.

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
1:08 pm

Frank, vandalism! Too funny.

But I’m no adherent of fair and balanced/equal time proposals.

I advocate that the sovereign people’s assets be used for the benefit of the sovereign people. And that those who use them be made to finally pay for their free rides.

thomas, slander? A strong word. To which I say, physician heal thyself.

Paying taxes and paying rent are not synonymous…

Apologies gladly accepted…

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:09 pm

“Do their feelings not matter?”

Yep.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:10 pm

Pro choice,

“I think not….can’t recall being castigated for the choice I have made?”

Just because you don’t listen doesn’t mean people aren’t snickering at you.

Disgusted

January 27th, 2010
1:11 pm

From Daily Kos:

O’Keefe was supposed to be the keynote speaker at a Salt Lake County GOP fundraiser on Feb. 4. But county GOP Chairman Thomas Wright told the Salt Lake Tribune: “We’ll be announcing a new speaker shortly.” … Rep. Pete Olson, R-Tex., is on the defense for introducing a resolution honoring O’Keefe for exposing ACORN. He told the Hill that he doesn’t condone unlawful behavior … There were 31 cosponsors on that resolution, so you can expect Democratic challengers to use that resolution against their GOP opponents in this fall’s midterm elections.

Via Media Matters, the 31 sponsors of the resolution which declared that accused felon James O’Keefe was “owed a debt of gratitude by the people of the United States” are all Republicans and, oddly, over a quarter of them serve districts in Texas: Todd Akin (R-MO2), Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD6), Joe Barton (R-TX6), Rob Bishop (R-UT1), Jo Bonner (R-AL1), John Boozman (R-AR3), Paul Broun (R-GA10), Henry Brown (R-SC1), John Campbell (R-CA48), John Carter (R-TX31), Howard Coble (R-NC6), Tom Cole (R-OK4), Michael Conaway (R-TX11), John Culberson (R-TX7), Mary Fallin (R-OK5), Trent Franks (R-AZ2), Louis Gohmert (R-TX1), Kay Granger (R-TX12), Ralph Hall (R-TX4), Jim Jordan (R-OH4), Steve King (R-IA5), John Kline (R-MN2), Doug Lamborn (R-CO5), Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO9), Daniel Lungren (R-CA3), Kenny Marchant (R-TX24), Joseph Pitts (R-PA16), Bill Posey (R-FL15), Phil Roe (R-TN1), John Shadegg (R-AZ3), and of course Jean Schmidt (R-OH2).

So you see, Paul is a liberal in comparison to most elected officials from Texas.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
1:11 pm

Ref: Thomas @ 12:59

No doubt condoms are controversial to some Catholics. Interesting that most polls (if you believe polls) show that the majority of Catholic-Americans use birth control in some form.

You are never going to please everyone all of the time.

The issue with the SuperBowl is:
1. It is one of, if not the largest, viewing audience
2. Life vs. Choice is controversial across the spectrum, i.e. most people have a strong view on this
3. SuperBowl is supposed to a chance for Americans to gather to root for their team, eat, drink and be merry. Introducing a highly controversial issue, evidenced by our debate here, raises the question of whether it is appropriate.

I am fine with this ad as long as the policy now opens up access to ads by those that take the opposite view or that want to promote opinions on other controversial topics.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
1:12 pm

thomas – what if’s aren’t much of an argument, what if one of the aborted would have become a bigger, better OBL or Hitler? Your view is fine, but you should accept that it stems from a religious belief that life is sacred. Nice belief, but like all religion it’s based on faith, not the factual evidence. The overwhelming evidence says life is common and cheap and while the quality is improving in the third world, it’s getting worse in the civilized world.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
1:17 pm

Pro Choice – If all life is so sacred why are you pro choice?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:19 pm

“I am fine with this ad as long as the policy now opens up access to ads by those that take the opposite view or that want to promote opinions on other controversial topics.”

I’m hoping a commercial for the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom will have an ad on soon. I’m sure they have a beautiful story to tell as well, and everyone watching the Super Bowl will really be moved.

Here is their website for those who wish to contribute:
http://www.ncsfreedom.org/

Air America's Mortician

January 27th, 2010
1:22 pm

The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.

Mick

January 27th, 2010
1:23 pm

Question: Does anybody actually have to go to work on this blog or are you all indepedently wealthy?

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
1:23 pm

Ref: jewcowboy @ 1:19

Go 4 it. I gave up sex a long time ago so I won’t be contributing.

I think CBS is going to agonize over this decision going forward because they opened the door and now they have to deal with how to manage the policy without appearing to take sides in controversial subjects.

Outhouse GoKart

January 27th, 2010
1:23 pm

Enter your comments here

Urban Meyer

January 27th, 2010
1:25 pm

If CBS will air a commercial advertising “The Morning After” abortion pill why would there be controversy concerning an athlete expressing his personal opinion about abortion?

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
1:25 pm

Well, I, for one, have had enough of this anti-choice hypocrisy, so I shall move on.

Beck Condemns O’Keefe’s Operation, Calls It Watergate

It looks bad when even Glenn Beck throws you under the bus.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/27/beck-condemns-okeefe/

Bud Wiser

January 27th, 2010
1:25 pm

Uh, Granny G, you never do what you suggested I do, so go stuff it someplace dark.

I don’t take ideas from morons, and it was a simple matter of italicizing, and it was overlooked.

Take your liberal crap, and, shove it.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:26 pm

Air America’s Mortician,

Read spam emails much? The subject of that was: Words of Wisdom for Today 2010. My right-wing troglodyte cousin sent that to me last week. Good to know you can copy and paste.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:28 pm

Mick,

“Does anybody actually have to go to work on this blog or are you all indepedently wealthy?”

Much downtime as my work decided not to upgrade the internet connection and uploading 2Gb graphic files take quite some time.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:31 pm

Swede Atlanta,

“I think CBS is going to agonize over this decision going forward because they opened the door and now they have to deal with how to manage the policy without appearing to take sides in controversial subjects.”

It will be hard to put the genie back in the bottle.

pat

January 27th, 2010
1:34 pm

jake, he is in jail for murdering his unborn child with a charge of murder…Where are you getting lost?

Mick

January 27th, 2010
1:35 pm

There is some interesting info, silly arguments and some much needed humor, so thanks for that..

Jake

January 27th, 2010
1:36 pm

Swede = you mean CBA has to take a position like Fox, fair and balanced?

TaxPayer

January 27th, 2010
1:37 pm

Wow. Did any of you folks stop for lunch. Hundreds of posts since last I peeked. I’ll bet not a single right winger has posted the definition of abortion that they’re willing to accept or even when life begins.

redneckbluedog

January 27th, 2010
1:38 pm

ok..so let’s say tebow turns out to be homosexual, which many in the South, including myself, suspect…maybe next year mr. dobson (who once had ted haggard as his protoge) will put out another add with timmy and his mommy…..

pat

January 27th, 2010
1:38 pm

thinkprogress.org….LOL! I think you better off reading from the vagina monologs. An ad hoc liberal brain washing site….funny. Why don’t you quote from Air America…Oh wait, they wen out of business because nobody could listen to that garbage.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
1:38 pm

jewcowboy,

“My right-wing troglodyte cousin ”

We all got one of those don’t we…..

Matilda

January 27th, 2010
1:39 pm

Mr. Meyer @ 1:25, I find ALL pharmaceutical advertising annoying and offensive, since prescription-only drugs should be recommended by a doctor, not sought by hypochondriacs seeking better living through chemistry. The non-prescription morning after pill is not an “abortion” pill. Please do your research before butting in.

I have no problem with Tim Tebow airing his opinion, since I don’t give a rat’s fuzzy what a 20 year old male has to say about the uterus of another. If someone wants to blow $3 mil to feel self-righteous, have at it. Poor kid is going to be devastated when he comes down off that pedestal the sycophants in Florida put him on. Aside from the skeeter-feeding bible thumpers, NOBODY CARES what lil’ Timmy thinks. You should have taught him how to take a snap in the real world. He’s lost outside his bubble. Nice going.

Algonquin J. Calhoun

January 27th, 2010
1:41 pm

The ad is a political one and an opposing viewpoint should be allowed. I’m sure there are plenty of parents who would be happy to appear with children they wish they’d aborted. As for whether Tebow can make it in the pros, many a Georgia cracker has espoused hatred of him but they hate him for a reason. He’s damn good and he beats the University of Georgia like a drum. He’ll be a great quarterback in the NFL. That’ll give you douchebags something else to hate him for!

Bud Wiser

January 27th, 2010
1:41 pm

Enter your comments here

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:42 pm

Bosch,

“We all got one of those don’t we…..”

One of those mouth-breather’s if you know what I mean.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
1:42 pm

pat – I’m not lost, I’m confused by your inability to grasp the concept. Yes, he was tried and convicted not only for Laci but for fetal murder. But that very same law, and to the best of my knowledge all of the laws against fetal murder in all 30 states that have such a law specifically EXCLUDE abortion. I don’t see why I have to keep explaining this to you. By law fetal homicide is murder but abortion is not fetal homicide or child murder or baby killing., and within certain limitations is legal. Which part of that don’t you understand?

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
1:42 pm

Bud Wiser

Shorts too tight?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
1:43 pm

“I’m sure there are plenty of parents who would be happy to appear with children they wish they’d aborted”

WOW! That was one of the best statements so far. Love it.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
1:43 pm

“I’ll bet not a single right winger has posted the definition of abortion that they’re willing to accept or even when life begins.”

Absolutely, positively correct you are.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
1:44 pm

Jake @ 1:36

I wish the broadcast and print media would research and report the news and not comment on it. At least in print media the fact that something appears in the Editorials section alerts everyone clearly this is “opinion”. But with the 24 x 7 news cycles, opinion and news are mixed as well as butter in mashed potatoes.

That said, one difference between CBS and Fox is CBS broadcasts on the public airwaves and therefore, in my view, owes the public consideration when they air ads promoting or opposing controversial topics. Fox “News”, just like CNBC is on cable/satellite. That is a private, proprietary network.

stands for decibels

January 27th, 2010
1:44 pm

Wayyy upthread @@ wondered what PETA thought about abortion.

a quick googling got me this, in case anyone cares:

“Where does the animal rights movement stand on abortion?”

There are people on both sides of the abortion issue in the animal rights movement, just as there are people on both sides of animal rights issues in the pro-life movement. And just as the pro-life movement has no official position on animal rights, the animal rights movement has no official position on abortion.

Bosch

January 27th, 2010
1:44 pm

“I’m sure there are plenty of parents who would be happy to appear with children they wish they’d aborted.”

That, my friend, was funny.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
1:46 pm

pat

scoff at TPM, but the data remains accurate and you can’t handle the truth.

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
1:48 pm

Lauer Calls Out Cantor’s Claim That The GOP Stood ‘Ready And Willing’ To Work With Obama On The Stimulus

Last month, when asked by the Economist to name a republicant “big idea” for job creation, Cantor couldn’t come up with a single idea.

Of course he couldn’t, because the republicants are bereft of ideas, and their only purpose is to make sure that this country fails.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/27/cantor-jobs-plan/

DT

January 27th, 2010
1:52 pm

I’m sure a big part of CBS (liberal network) airing the 30 second spot is simple economics, nothing to do with politics. Advertising business is pretty rough these days, I’m sure they’d take an add from NOW or NARAL if those organizations wanted to drop the $2.5 million for 30 seconds of airtime.
Does anyone actually know what the ad/spot is going to say other than rumors that Tim Tebow will discuss the fact that his mother did not follow certain doctors’ advice and not have an abortion? If anyone has a copy of the script, I’d like to read it. I’m sure a lot of the “controversy” is just a chance for people like NOW and NARAL to make noise in the news and get press.

Disgusted

January 27th, 2010
1:54 pm

“We all got one of those don’t we…..”

I have one who’s retired and living in Canton, Ohio. I, along with about 30 others on his DL, receive about five e-mails per day from him–all of them either racist or homophobic or extremely conservative. He’s all against the government but certainly doesn’t mind receiving the benefits of Social Security and Medicare. It doesn’t faze him when you try to tell him you’d rather not be receiving the junk he looks up 24/7/365. So this week I added him to the spam list.

TGT

January 27th, 2010
1:57 pm

Haven’t weighed in on this yet so:

Life in the womb for a baby is as well documented as anything in science. (Hardly any serious scientist in the world would argue against the fact that life begins at conception.) With ultrasound and doppler machines, as well as other technology, one can monitor the life of a baby in the womb from very near the beginning until birth. I understand this well not only because of what I’ve read and studied, but also because my wife and I have four small children.

Just over a year ago we had our 3rd son. The moment after conception, we were the proud parents of a one-celled, forty-six-chromosomed baby, which possesses everything he needed to grow into an adult human. Within 48 hours he produced a hormone which let my wife’s body know that she was pregnant. On day 6 the embryo began implanting in the uterus. By week 3 his little heart began to beat with his own blood, which is often a different type than the mother’s.

During week 5 my son’s eyes, legs, and hands began to develop. Week 6 revealed detectable brain waves and his mouth and lips were present. By week 7 his toes formed and her nose was distinct. Also, he began bending his legs and stretching, jumping, and kicking. By week 8 every organ was in place and bones began to replace cartilage. He could then turn his head, suck his thumb, and respond to pain. (At around week 8 of our pregnancies, which is not long after most women even realize that they are pregnant, we saw an ultrasound of each of our children. Every organ was in place and bones were forming. I could see and hear their little hearts beat at around 150 beats per minute.)

By week 12 he had all the necessary parts to experience pain, including his nerves, spinal cord, and thalamus. He could grasp objects placed in his hand and had fingerprints, a skeletal structure, and circulation. Around week 17 he could have dream (REM) sleep.

With the new (4-D) ultrasound machines, a person can see with amazing clarity the baby in the womb. The babies can be seen grasping things, sucking their thumbs, and responding to stimuli.

More and more babies that are being born early, some just past halfway in the gestation period (20 weeks), are surviving because of the march of science.

Prior to the dreadful 1973 Roe v. Wade decision 33 states had laws against abortion except when needed to save the life of the mother. Twelve other states had laws that allowed abortion only in cases of rape, fetal deformity, or to protect the life/health of the mother. A ruling by seven unelected judges changed all of that and what had been the will of the people for centuries was cast aside.

Mother Theresa said it best when she noted that, “The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion. Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching the people to love but to use any violence to get what they want.”

Jake

January 27th, 2010
1:57 pm

Swede – Good points, but I think you need a license to broadcast air or cable, don’t you? The NYTimes, just using them as one example, has printed op-ed pieces on it’s front page posing as legitimate news for many years. Straight, factual, unbiased reporting was the norm in the 50’s but is now very scarce. In fact, IMHO, the news media has polarized the country as a way of increasing revenues. Whether you’re Rush or Air America, you get a target audience and you cater to it.

Williebkind

January 27th, 2010
2:02 pm

Jenifer

January 27th, 2010
1:48 pm

Nope your are wrong again. They want Obama and the progressive liberals to fail–not America. The progressive liberals want America to fail because they do not believe in capitalism. Progessives love murderers like Che Guevara(you got your t-shirt or necklace dont you), Mao, Stalin, Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Hitler and the philosophers like Bernard Shaw. Progressive liberals can not be allowed to succeed.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
2:04 pm

Ref: Jake @ 1:57

Yes, I’m sure there are licensing requirements for cable. But they don’t use public broadcast airwaves that are limited.

Completely agree that nothing that claims to be news is any longer news. The “free press” that was once viewed as essential to our democracy is long gone in favor of commercial interests.

Doggone/GA

January 27th, 2010
2:08 pm

“Prior to the dreadful 1973 Roe v. Wade decision 33 states had laws against abortion except when needed to save the life of the mother. Twelve other states had laws that allowed abortion only in cases of rape, fetal deformity, or to protect the life/health of the mother. A ruling by seven unelected judges changed all of that and what had been the will of the people for centuries was cast aside”

Anyone who is willing to allow abortion for ANY reason…is pro-choice, whether they like it or not.

What is your alternative? Would YOU FORCE the woman to carry her pregnancy to term, thereby enslaving her to YOUR version of “morals”? Or is it all about being able punish her for getting an abortion?

If it’s the punishment, then you ARE PRO-CHOICE, because you would not interfere in the woman’s decision to GET an abortion…you would only punish her for making a decision YOU don’t like, but for which you have no viable alternative.

MAC

January 27th, 2010
2:10 pm

The networks constantly have advocacy issues points of view imbedded in the scripts of their shows so I don’t see the big deal here.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
2:16 pm

Cowboy,

Do your foster parents know you are downloading 2 gig files? Your stepdad is going to give you a beating……or is it a “meating”?

MAC

January 27th, 2010
2:19 pm

Eight pages of comments and not one person has actually seen the ad.

Jay, good job on the red meat post.

TGT

January 27th, 2010
2:22 pm

Doggone: It’s not simply “my morals.” There is ONE who is the author of all things. All that is right and true must be rooted in Him.

What you see as a “forced” pregnancy I see as protecting a life. (And it is a life.)

“Anyone who is willing to allow abortion for ANY reason…is pro-choice, whether they like it or not.”–Agreed.

There are many “alternatives” to abortion. Visit any crisis pregnancy center and you can learn them.

Matilda

January 27th, 2010
2:27 pm

Algonquin J. Calhoun at 1:41

Know who Tebow never beat? Auburn, that’s who. Even if he had, that would not qualify him to make medical decisions for women he’s never met. Ah, the hubris of a kid who thinks he knows everything because somebody handed him a bible. IF he is indeed a virgin (yeah right), that makes him LESS qualified to discuss such matters, but if loving Tebow feels so right to you, how could it be wrong? Heh…

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
2:28 pm

TGT

who is that ONE and what did ONE say?

TGT

January 27th, 2010
2:38 pm

Granny: Seek Him and you will find Him.

mike

January 27th, 2010
2:38 pm

“Also, the ad is being backed by Focus On The Family, an evangelical organization which advocates a bigoted, narrow-minded and authoritarian worldview characterized by advocacy of school-supported prayer and intolerance of homosexuality, same-sex marriage, pre-marital sex, organized gambling and science.”

Yeah, they should be tolerant like you.

Spare us your hypocrisy.

mike

January 27th, 2010
2:41 pm

Matilda -

“Even if he had, that would not qualify him to make medical decisions for women he’s never met.”

Good thing he is not doing that. Unless, of course those of you are abortion advocates are making medical decisions for women when you speak your mind.

mike

January 27th, 2010
2:44 pm

Doggone/GA

“Would YOU FORCE the woman to carry her pregnancy to term, thereby enslaving her to YOUR version of “morals”? ”

Well, let’s look at it another way. Let’s say the mother decided to abort the baby the day before its due date even though the baby is healthy.

Would you object to this? How bout the day after the baby was born?

If you object to this are you not, “enslaving her to YOUR version of “morals”?

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
2:46 pm

TGT

Actually my ONE, never spoke of abortion. Ever.

You must havethe wrong one.

mike

January 27th, 2010
2:46 pm

For me, the issue of abortion is a matter of bio-ethics, not religion.

mike

January 27th, 2010
2:47 pm

Mrs G –

While I might not share your views on this, I agree that my readings of Jesus’s teachings do not make reference to abortion.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
2:52 pm

mike

thanks.

here’s hoping our future includes a way to make this argument a thing of the past.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
3:04 pm

Enter your comments here

DAVID-AJC Truth detector

January 27th, 2010
3:09 pm

WOULD THE SO CALLED WOMEN’S groups just quitely disappear…be gone.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
3:13 pm

Jeremiah 22:3 says this: Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.

This command occurs in II Kings 24, Exodus 20, Job 22 Deutoronomy 9, and about 50 other places. We are forbidden to shed INNOCENT BLOOD in scripture. Period.

So if Life begins at conception, which the Bible CLEARLY TEACHES, then that is not a clump of cells, but a BABY and therefor innocent blood. Killing an UNBORN BABY is murder pure and simple.

Matilda

January 27th, 2010
3:15 pm

David @ 3:09, you mean like all the women in your life? Don’t worry. Just be yourself and speak your mind, and women will flee from you as if you were a hideous spider on a half-eaten Luna bar. There, there now… don’t be scared little chicken. The wimminz will leave wittle poopy pants alone now.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
3:15 pm

doggonega, you make comments ALL THE TIME that would lead one to believe that you would “enslave people to YOUR version of “morals”.

Goose/Gander

chuck

January 27th, 2010
3:17 pm

For example doggone, you want to take away MY MONEY that I worked for to pay for someone else’s healthcare. Isn’t that “enslaving me to YOUR version of morals?”

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
3:18 pm

Sorry chuck. wrong ONE.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
3:19 pm

To which “ONE” are you referring Mrs. G?

@@

January 27th, 2010
3:20 pm

Obama was the only candidate to buy an ad during the Super Bowl, one that ran in 24 states, to the tune of $250,000. The focus was on two strongly progressive messages: ending the war and saving the planet.

Turns out the planet is doing just fine without his help. The babies? He could lend his voice to them, but what the hey….he’s got an environment that demands his attention.

He also gave the progressives another war–one they can be proud of.

Focus on the Family’s money is as good as anyone elses. They’re message places value on life.

TGT

January 27th, 2010
3:29 pm

Mike/Granny: There’s plenty of “bio” (biology) at my 1:57.

Whacks Eloquent

January 27th, 2010
3:29 pm

Abortion, while common in the Roman Empire, was an unthinkable practice in ancient Jewish society. There would be no reference to it since they would not have considered it. In the Roman world, on the other hand, it was rampant and quite an accepted practice. The clash between Christianity and abortion began in the very early years of the church. Here is a link to a good summary article of the struggle.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_v36/ai_3521569/

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
3:33 pm

chuck

i could do a TGT and say seek and you shall find, but that’s kinda’ silly.

I am a follower of the Fisherman…..and he never spoke of abortion.

I don’t take the Old Testament/Torah too seriously, I see too many Christian shrimp eaters….what an abomination!

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
3:33 pm

Chuck @ 3:13

Chuck, the Bible is a manifestation of your Christian FAITH. Nothing in the Bible is intrinsically true just because it appears there. You may be a fundamentalist that believes every word in the Bible is true. That’s great, for you. But regardless it doesn’t make it true.

Since we are a nation of people of many faiths and belief traditions, including atheists, your religious beliefs should not be imposed on others. For me, abortion is morally wrong and should be used only in the most extreme of circumstances. But I don’t believe it is my place in this secular society to prohibit it. I support ways to reduce the need for abortion including responsible sex education, reasonable access to birth control, support for adoption programs, etc.

So, if you are opposed to abortion, don’t have one (if your name is Chuck I guess you can’t have one anyway). Support programs to reduce the need for abortion. But don’t impose your moral and religious beliefs on the rest of society.

I do have a couple of questions for you. Do you eat shellfish? Have you ever shaved your beard? Have you ever had relations with a woman during her time of uncleanliness? If so you have committed an abomination.

Also you talk about the prohibition against taking innocent life. Do you support the death penalty? If so you have very likely supported the taking of innocent life since from recent cases that there are alot of people on death row that have been proven to be innocent. I suspect we have “murdered” several innocent people. How about the innocent Iraqis and Afghanis that our bombs have killed. Yes there are bad Iraqis and bad Afghanis but have you decried the loss of those innocent lives?

How about people who die needlessly because they don’t have access to healthcare? The list goes on and on.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
3:40 pm

Swede believes slavery should still be legal because the driving factor behind its elimination was the Christian faith. Sorry that Christian ideology was imposed upon you Swede…..maybe the Stockholm syndrome will not manifest itself in you.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
3:41 pm

Follower of the Fisherman….yeah right!! Those Old Testament Commandments must be too burdensome for you to bear. Especially the one about “Thou Shall Not Murder”.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
3:41 pm

Pro Choice

wow….did you just make that up or what?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
3:42 pm

Cowboy,

Thanks for the correction on up/down. Now is it a meating or beating stepdad will give you?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
3:43 pm

Pro Choice,

I know this thread is dead, but just in case.

“Do your foster parents know you are downloading 2 gig files? Your stepdad is going to give you a beating……or is it a “meating”?”

You do really have issues with reading comprehension issues…upload is not download. Before you show your idiocy, please read the post correctly. Your inanity is tedious.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
3:43 pm

Yep….Just now Granny.

Sick&Tired

January 27th, 2010
3:45 pm

The same people who say they value life, such as the Focus on Family group; are a bunch of liars. They usually support war and the death penalty; while at the same time they despise programs that the government run to help the poor women who do “Choose” to give birth.
I find it ODD that the same people who talk about welfare moms are usually in the same Anti-abortion groups. They don’t care if poor women and children do not have access to healthcare, but talk down about them whenever the find the need. The South Carolina Lieutenant Governor is an excellent example, with his animal metaphor. You don’t want to feed, house or educate the kids. But, you want a say so about their right to life. Okay, how about providing those that parents did chose a right to LIFE; please feed, house and educate them without COMPLAINT.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
3:46 pm

Pro Choice,

“Now is it a meating or beating stepdad will give you?”

You’re the expert on dick, you tell me.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
3:47 pm

Wow Cowboy…..maybe I will be a deep and logical thinker as you one day. NOT!!

Old & Rich

January 27th, 2010
3:48 pm

Sick & Tired,

We, the producers, of this country are tired of supporting you, the leeches, and your lack of ability to support yourself. You should say a little prayer every day that there are those out there who provide for your basic necessities.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
3:49 pm

Pro Choice,

“maybe I will be a deep and logical thinker as you one day.”

I’d settle for simple reading comprehension, but alas, I think that might be in vain.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
3:49 pm

Pro Choice

Oh behave yourself.

The 10 commandments are kindergarten. Only one I ever have a problem
with is that coveting thing. (neighbor has a 1961 1/2 candy apple red mustang convertible, tough not to covet)

The Beatitudes are graduate level.

Again Jesus never spoke of the start of human life, perhaps because he too thought enough of women to allow them to decide for themselves.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
3:53 pm

Mrs. G, Jesus’ teachings CAME FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT. I hate to break it to you but Jesus had a lot to say about how we are to treat CHILDREN. Since the Bible is quite clear that the unborn is a CHILD, I would take that seriously.

Swede, We have many laws with which people disagree. Abortion is no different. The concept of right and wrong in and of its self is a matter of religion. Does that mean that we should be legally free to do whatever we wish? Of course not. When in doubt, choose LIFE.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
3:54 pm

That’s ok Cowboy if everyone was as wise and intelligent as you then how could you impress us with your vast cerebral abilities. I think Ahmadinejad has a special place for you and your moniker…..

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
3:55 pm

Pardon me…..1964 1/2….just the thought of that gleaming red machine…

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
3:59 pm

chuck

are suggesting that Jesus used sort of Torah Teleprompter?

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:00 pm

Granny is quite the theologian…..maybe you could discuss a few topics with David Bell at Georgia State University.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
4:04 pm

sick and tired, you miss the point entirely. Christians supporting the death penalty and opposing abortion are not in any way at odds with themselves. Abortion takes an INNOCENT LIFE. Wars and the death penalty take the lives of murderers. I believe there is a huge difference between the 2.

As far as your statement about “not wanting to support them”, I see 2 issues. First, Christians DO SUPPORT women and children through COUNTLESS charitable efforts. Most conservatives, including Christian conservatives don’t believe that that is a legitimate function of the FEDERAL government. It is not a BAD thing, just a wrong-headed thing. Attempts to feed and clothe the poor is poorly done by a bloated federal government bureacracy and has resulted in that cycle of poverty repeating itself over and over again in the lives of the poor. It has cruelly created a permanent underclass and THAT is a disgrace.

Second, from a practical stand point, it is ALWAYS better when people take responsibility for themselves and their own families. EVERYBODY needs help at some point in their lives, but repeated irresponsible behavior should be punished, NOT rewarded.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:04 pm

Torah Teleprompter….now that is funny.

Pres BO is going to be mighty upset is someone is messin’ with his toy.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
4:05 pm

Pro Choice @ 3:40

Where did I say I believe in slavery? Please don’t attribute something to me that I didn’t say nor could you infer from anything I have posted.

I am in fact a Christian but I accept the fact that I live in a modern secular society. I don’t want an atheist to tell me to abandon my faith. I don’t want a Muslim to try to convert me to Islam. My faith and how it manifests itself in my life is an entirely personal matter.

In this society, individuals should not have the personal beliefs of others imposed on them.

What if American Muslims decided you needed to wear a Burqa because the Koran says so. Would you like that?

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
4:06 pm

Pro Choice

It’s the Jesuits and BVMs in the family……

Matilda

January 27th, 2010
4:10 pm

Hey chuck ol’ buddy. For what it’s worth, I support the right of that Focused on your family group to spend millions of dollars on the most expensive ad space in the universe to preach to their own choir.

I mean, using that cash to rebuild a hospital, church, or couple of schools in Haiti wouldn’t be NEARLY as much fun! Why SAVE LIVES when you can sell guilt? Maybe Mr. Tebow will even flash us a nipple to really round out our superbowl night entertainment. Wooot! Bring on the good, clean fun.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
4:11 pm

swede, again you miss the point. WE ARE A CHRISTIAN NATION, in spite of what the presbo would tell you. While we welcome people of other faiths to practice them, that doesn’t mean that we should cow-tow to them and have their beliefs foisted on us. Neither should we force our specific RELIGIOUS PRACTICES on them. That doesn’t mean that our LAWS are not or should not reflect our Judeo-Christian values as a NATION. Just as THE LAWS in THEIR COUNTRY reflect THEIR RELIGIOUS VALUES. It is not that difficult a concept to get your mind around.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
4:12 pm

Mighty nice of you Matilda.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
4:13 pm

chuck

nope we are a secular nation with a lot of christians….a lot of whom believe very differently from you.

you are right about this though “Neither should we force our specific RELIGIOUS PRACTICES on them.” SO DON’T

chuck

January 27th, 2010
4:14 pm

Wrong granny, and “I DON’T”

Jake

January 27th, 2010
4:14 pm

chuck – Right and wrong are actually the subject of ethics, a branch of philsophy. Various religions attempt to codify certain ethical practices (ten commandements, for example) but that does not in and of itself give them any moral or ethical superiority. In fact, the bizarre set of beliefs to which you appear to ascribe has resulted in countless horrors over the years, from the Crusades to the Inquisition to witch burning.

chuck

January 27th, 2010
4:15 pm

hey ya’ll have a great afternoon. Off to church.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:17 pm

Swede,

So you are an anarchist? You basically don’t want anyone else’s laws/beliefs imposed upon you? You want to be able to own assault rifles, grenades, etc. because you don’t want those evil, filthy values someone else has imposed upon you? How about bestiality? Is that OK in your eyes? What about polygamy? Any issues with marrying children off to adult? I think you people in GA are quite common at that……

Matilda

January 27th, 2010
4:19 pm

Jake, c’mon you know those “witches” wuz askin for it. Didn’t you see the way they were dressed? The good Christians wuz just helping them take personal repsonsibility for their own sinful behavior.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
4:19 pm

chuck – While you’re at church you might want to pray that Tebow masters taking a snap under center and accurate passing so he will have more money to spread the myth of fundamentalist christianity.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
4:20 pm

Pro Choice,

“I think Ahmadinejad has a special place for you and your moniker…..”

I think he might have a place for you as well.

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
4:20 pm

Ref: Chuck @ 4:11

No, we are not a Christian nation. There are many, many citations from the Founding Fathers that make clear they never intended this to be a Christian nation. The fact that the majority of Americans describe themselves as Christians doesn’t make us a Christian nation either. Our legal system is designed to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.

Who is foisting their beliefs on you? Christians cry how they are so discriminated against and yet I can’t find a single shred of evidence. Every court ruling and law related to the expression of faith is neutral. As a Christian I don’t consider myself set upon by other belief systems.

The fact is abortion is legal in this country. The Supreme Court has ruled that abortion, with certain reasonable restrictions, is covered by the right to privacy in our Constitution. If you want to make it illegal then get cracking to amend the Constitution. But until then it is legal. That is a fact.

But I want to ask you a question. What if it was illegal? Do you think it is right that those with means who can travel abroad can obtain an abortion while others are forced to the back alleys or attempted self-induced abortions? Is that a better system?

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
4:21 pm

“WE ARE A CHRISTIAN NATION”

With a secular government. Go figure.

Sick&Tired

January 27th, 2010
4:23 pm

Chuck, you missed the point. Every life is valuable, whether or not you agree with how they live it or not.

Yes, many charities provide for the poor. However, if they actaully were providing wholeheartedly and not every now and then; maybe we wouldn’t need government intervention at all.

A child needs a home and food everyday, not when the charity or church can provide. There is nothing worse than a child, who is sick and unable to be seen by a physician.

I’m not just talking about people who live only on government assistance; I’m talking about families that have low incomes and primarily provide for themselves. If people rely completely on charities, in this economy, they would be homeless and hungry.

The government programs such as welfare should do more to encourage people to educate themselves and find jobs that can actually substain a family. It’s not enough to say “Get a JOB”, any JOB. There are many people who would love to have a great career and the salary to boot; but you have people in this country who don’t believe in a true LIVING WAGE. Yes, we have Minimum wage, but it’s not truly enough to substain a family.

In my opinion, if Jane Doe decides that she likes being a cashier at Wal-Mart and is happy in that JOB, she should earn enough to take care of her family. There is absolutely nothing wrong with working as a cashier, it’s an earnest living. The same goes for trashmen, janitors, cooks, housekeepers, warehouse workers, etc……… I find it absolutely offensive that policemen and firemen earn so little for the jobs that they do.

My rant is about the value of life and how you should value the children that are born into our society.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:24 pm

Jake,

Care to take a look at some socialist ideologies and their number of murders? Within only the modern era Hitler, Stalin, Pot, and Mao have managed quite the efficient killing system……wars are based upon the desire of one group to subjugate (lookie there Cowboy a big word from someone so shallow) another group. In the past religion was used to rally the troops…no longer so in the Christian religion but the fervor does exist in other religions such as those of The Prophet as well as others on the Asian subcontinent.

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
4:24 pm

We are not a Christian nation……

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:28 pm

Granny,

Wrong again. You may not be Christian but the majority of people in this country consider themselves Christian. Really burns your azz doesn’t it….too bad about the fall of the Soviet Union where agnostic beliefs served them so well……….

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
4:31 pm

WE ARE A CHRISTIAN NATION,

Nonsense.

“As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] … it is declared … that no pretext arising from religious opinion shall ever product an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries….”The United States is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation.” — Treaty of Tripoli (1797), carried unanimously by the Senate and signed into law by John Adams (the original language is by Joel Barlow, US Consul)

The Founding fathers were nearly all “Infidels”, of the first presidents – Washington; Adams; Jefferson; Madison; Monroe; Adams; Jackson – not a one had professed a belief in Christianity

Old & Rich

January 27th, 2010
4:31 pm

Sick,

So we should pay people a “living wage” to basically do what they want to? I don’t even thing Karl Marx would argue that dogma……..if you want more money, material things, etc. then you have to be willing to do what others can not or will not do. Otherwise you should continue sitting on the corner and thanking those who throw loose change your way….

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:33 pm

Cowboy,

I can convert….your moniker will rat you out. DP was a victim of their ideology….

Granny Godzilla

January 27th, 2010
4:34 pm

chuck

no my tushie is just the right temperature thank you, but aren’t you sweet to be concerned.

nope, you are really big time wrong.

Let me repeat – we are a secular nation with a lot o’ Christians.

Russia….yep the Christian Czars did a bang up job…..oh you mean the OTHER fall…..

Swede Atlanta

January 27th, 2010
4:35 pm

Ref: Pro Choice

Thanks for the laugh. I needed that. No, I am not an anarchist nor am I a Georgian. I am bluer than blue can be.

Of course laws reflect our cultural tradition. In our case it is a Judeo-Christian tradition that came with the settlers to the New World.
But the Founders recognized that given their life experiences they set up a form of government that was intended to protect the minority from the majority through a set of checks and balances. They were very concerned about the tyranny of the majority.

There are certain societal precepts that are generally accepted around the world, perhaps not in every single society, but in most. I think most societies agree that stealing isn’t good. Gunning someone down in a church isn’t good. The list goes on and on. I’ve always wondered about the prohibition against bestiality. Who is the victim? Since I was raised in Wyoming I suspect it is the poor sheep we are trying to protect.

We have prudently outlawed Polygamy and child marriages but not necessarily because of religious beliefs. The Bible is filled with arranged adult-child marriages. Polygamy was practiced in the Old Testament. But as a society we have decided these practices can be prohibited under our Constitution.

The Constitution, however, is very, very secular. The Supreme Court has ruled abortion legal under the current Constitution. If we want to have a societal debate on this matter then we need to go through the amendment process. Once again the process is specifically cumbersome to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:38 pm

Swede,

PETA is going to be quite upset with you making derogatory comments about those wonderful tasting sheep.

jewcowboy

January 27th, 2010
4:41 pm

Pro Choice,

“I can convert….”

I just bet you could. Perhaps you could also disguise yourself as a woman or child as the Titanic sank too..

“So our virtues Lie in the interpretation of the time” ~ William Shakespeare

The End Game

January 27th, 2010
4:41 pm

It all boils down to whether you actually support murder or not and at what point does life begin. If you succumb to the belief that life begins at conception then it is murder, if birth then a medical procedure to take care of a growth….kind of like removing a cancer. It simply boils down to this.

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:42 pm

Cowboy,

Yes they do. Virtues today would have you burned at the stake in earlier times….it would also have your hand cut off for stealing……..

AmVet

January 27th, 2010
4:45 pm

For the second time today:

Murder –noun

1. The killing of another human being UNDER CONDITIONS SPECIFICALLY COVERED IN LAW. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder).

Abortion is not murder. Not in America. Not in 2010.

And all the fallacious claims in the world do not make it so…

The End Game

January 27th, 2010
4:52 pm

Guess this means that abortions are spontaneous (not to be confused with the actual biological process in a woman’s body over which she has no control) actions taken at a doctor’s office that have not been deliberated beforehand?

The End Game

January 27th, 2010
4:54 pm

Can someone please enlighten me as to when life begins? It might make this debate much simpler if we could simply decide that…

Pro Choice

January 27th, 2010
4:57 pm

Cowboy,

Since you wish to quote the Bard of Avon…….I think you are just heavenly & speak to few.

Jake

January 27th, 2010
5:08 pm

Pro choice – Agreed, I didn’t say all of the historical atrocities were committed by christians, just an awful lot for a bunch that claim to worship a loving and merciful god. One of the christians weakest tenets is where that loving and mericful god gave you free will so you could break her commandments and rape and murder all you want so god in turn can either forgive you or punish you with eternal damnation in hell. Huh? Why don’t we all just love and be good to each other on earth as it is in heaven? The answer is because I am a realist and pragmatist and you ascribe to mysticism that makes no sense whatsoever, but relies on the unthinking faith of it’s followers. In a secular society, even one with strong christian roots, that’s why we can’t have you fundamentalists running the country on faith based decisions instead of logical ones.

Mr. Miyagi

January 27th, 2010
5:27 pm

Ralph Macchio is the anti-christ

Mr Right

January 27th, 2010
6:10 pm

I got it figured out how stop abortion once and for all! If we would abort all the babies that in the future would abort babies soon there would be no more abortion!

midtownguy

January 27th, 2010
6:55 pm

My only question is, if the people sponsoring this ad have 3 Million to pay for it under their pro-family campaign, why aren’t they donating it to the Haitian orphans instead?

R. E.

January 27th, 2010
7:03 pm

Plain truth is that Tim almost did not exist, but his mom changed her mind and saved his life. Some one wants to pay 3 million to tell the world that. Its a fact. Whats the problem?

There are places in the world where abortion is outlawed. Unwanted children are born when they would have otherwise been aborted. They would regret not having a chance at life. The USA doesn’t give them one.

I think this video says it best
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAXCek6lAxI

cmac

January 27th, 2010
7:31 pm

Would rather watch Tebow talk about the murder that is abortions than see obozo or his sorry ass wife in some phony commercial like the “donate to Haiti” crap I had to see last weekend during the games. Check out how much those two gave to charity UNTIL he decided to be the king of the world! HYPOCRITES!

Joel Dockery

January 27th, 2010
7:33 pm

No, this isn’t a “free speech” issue. In fact I am quite sure it cost quite a lot. I don’t know where people get off telling corporations what kind of advertising policy they should have, as if there is some kind of quota for “X amount of “liberal” advertising” and “Y amount of “conservative” advertising”. How about if I told you that your next blog must show the opposite point of view and you should advocate using the FCC and FBI to use violence to prevent CBS from airing this ad? That would be fair, right?

LTexas

January 28th, 2010
1:44 am

Hoof Hearted, Jan, all the people here making this about Obama, liberals, etc.: Ok, if Dr Dobson and Tim Tebow are merely exercising their 2nd amendment right to free speech with this touching personal story , then I should be able to make an ad also. It will feature me and my mother. I will thank her profusely for allowing our family doctor to terminate a possible pregnancy at 4AM in the emergency room after I had been viciously raped at age 11 by an intruder with our entire family in the house.
Oh, so inappropriate you say? But free speech should go both ways, shouldn’t it? If Tim Tebow can tell his personal story, shouldn’t I be able to tell mine if I get a backer willing to put up a few million?
Or perhaps CBS should get a clue and keep any and all mention of controversial social/religious issues like abortion OUT of the Super Bowl??

[...] days ended, but I guess that was naïve on my part.  And second, again as a confirmed libertarian, CBS deserves a helluva lot more grief than it’s getting for its decision to air the ad in light of its past [...]

billy37

January 28th, 2010
8:03 pm

He is good, I mean he’s really good but you know the way the media, the fans, and even his own family has built him up into this demigod, can only lead him to trouble down the road. He’s just a human being. “The Chosen One” is such an incredibly pretentious title.
This made me stop and think though!http://ketiva.com/Sports/controversial_tim_tebow_to_be_featured_at_super_bowl.html