Breach between Israel, White House a bit more public

The breach between the Israeli government and the Obama administration becomes a little more public:

from the Israeli daily Haaretz:

“The White House responded angrily Tuesday to Israel’s plan to build 900 new housing units beyond the Green Line in Jerusalem, despite specific objections from the U.S., saying that “we are dismayed.”

In a statement, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs voiced the U.S.’s disappointment with “the Jerusalem Planning Committee’s decision to move forward on the approval process for the expansion of Gilo in Jerusalem.”

The Jerusalem municipal planning committee approved the construction plan Tuesday despite an expose in Israel’s Yedioth Aharonot newspaper earlier in the day revealing that the U.S. has specifically objected to the construction outlined in the plan.

“Ata time when we are working to relaunch negotiations,” the White House spokesman went on to say, “these actions make it more difficult for our efforts to succeed. Neither party should engage in efforts or take actions that could unilaterally pre-empt, or appear to pre-empt, negotiations.”

“The U.S. also objects to other Israeli practices in Jerusalem related to housing, including the continuing pattern of evictions and demolitions of Palestinian homes,” the statement continued.”

I’m afraid the current Israeli government overestimates the durability of its political support here in the United States, even among many Jewish Americans. It is behaving as though it can ignore American requests without consequence, and in the long run I don’t think that’s true. Israel is certainly a sovereign country; it has every right to make its own decisions. However, the same is true of the United States, which supplies substantial financial, military and diplomatic support to Israel that it can adjust as its national interests dictate.

The almost monolithic support for Israel in Congress is not reflected among the American people as a whole. In addition, the acts of Palestinian terrorism that once provided political cover and justification for Israel’s settlement expansion have largely ceased, in large part because of Israeli military success. Under these conditions, continued expansion makes Israel look like the party that is refusing to negotiate in good faith.

The British government has responded in a similar fashion, reports AFP:

LONDON — Government condemned Tuesday Israel’s green light for hundreds of new housing units to be built in annexed east Jerusalem, saying it made a peace deal more difficult.

Foreign Secretary David Miliband “has been very clear that a credible deal involves Jerusalem as a shared capital,” said a spokeswoman, after Israel’s interior ministry approved the construction of 900 new units in Gilo.

“Expanding settlements on occupied land in East Jerusalem makes that deal much harder. So this decision is wrong and we oppose it,” added the Foreign Office spokeswoman.

484 comments Add your comment

Jimmy Carter

November 17th, 2009
3:53 pm

Barack Hussein Obama

Israel

Barack HUSSEIN Obama

Israel

A breach?

Nothing Is Free

November 17th, 2009
3:59 pm

Bosch

**Vouchers divert critical dollars and commitment from public schools**

Public schools are failing ALL the children. Can’t we just save the more promising? It’s not like anyone is trying to save any of them. A few is much better than none.

**Vouchers eliminate public accountability**

That would be testing. Most good private schools are much more academically sound than the horrible public school system. And again, we are not taking kids from Mountain Park High School. The scores of the ghetto schools are horrible.

**Vouchers leave behind many students, including those with the greatest needs—**

So they all have to stay behind? What kind of logic is that?

*Vouchers waste taxpayer money**

Giving the more gifted students a better education is wasting money? I couldn’t think of a better investment.

**Vouchers give choices to private schools, not parents—**

THis section just says that the private schools get to decide whether they will accept vouchers. that’s OK. Find a good school that does. there are plenty of them.

**Vouchers remain publicly unpopular**

Well that settles it. Keep em ignorant and pregnant. Those poll buses will be by every two years. Be sure to vote!!!

ROLLERGIRL

November 17th, 2009
4:00 pm

Why would Jews have ever thought HUSSEIN the muslim kenyan would be on their side?

Jerusalem is Israel’s capital, it’s their land, palestine doesn’t exist anymore than the cherokee and mohawk nations exist. Land won in war becomes Yours not the vanquished.

Obama is such a stumbling bumbling fool in everything he touches, that only Jimmy carter is smiling. He won’t have to be considered the nations sh*ttiest president ever, for much longer.

josef nix

November 17th, 2009
4:01 pm

Mark my words. This is but prelude to letting Israel off the leash to do our dirty work in Iran. Get in all the “distancing” from Israel possible and, then bash the h*ll out of them following the raid on the Qom facility, but it will be put out of commission.

ROLLERGIRL

November 17th, 2009
4:03 pm

BTW most so-called “palestinians” are muslim, and as we all know, typical muslims like nidal hasan, revere mohammed, and we all know mohammed was a pedophile..yep..sex with 9 year olds…sick cult ..Islam is bad, mmm kay?

MMM MMMM MMMMM barack hussein obama

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:05 pm

@ROLLERGIRL

You have a situation where verborrhea fits your rants precisely. Look it up and enjoy.
Jerusalem does not belong to Israel.

The only way he will be consider the nation’s “sh*ttiest president ever” is no one call you out for your stupidity.

Mrs. Godzilla

November 17th, 2009
4:06 pm

so called palestinians??????

ROLLERGIRL

November 17th, 2009
4:07 pm

Ah..input from one of the west end mosque attendees..you know, mohammed’s house of chicken and waffles.

stands for decibels

November 17th, 2009
4:07 pm

Jay, sometimes I wonder why you bother leaving the comments open on any Israel-themed post; it is, if such a thing is possible, a more reliable draw for The Stupids than a Birther thread.

That said, I do wonder if you have any polling data to back up this statement:

The almost monolithic support for Israel in Congress is not reflected among the American people as a whole.

I suspect you may be correct, but I’d be curious to see what you base this on.

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:07 pm

@ROLLERGIRL

Too bad you had not posted another of your misstatements before I posted.
More than 40% of the Palestinians are Christians. The cities of Bethlehem, Ramallah, Jenin to name a few, are considered Christian cities.

By the way, the Palestinians are one of the most highly educated groups in the Middle East. Too bad you did not have a means of getting your basic education in Palestine.

Mrs. Godzilla

November 17th, 2009
4:08 pm

’bout time we let Israel know our support for them is not limitless.

Nothing Is Free

November 17th, 2009
4:08 pm

Bosch

**It is simply a study on the effects of metropolitan areas on minority school children. There is no conclusive evidence in the study to support that vouchers will address the problem.**

I was framing the problem with the harvard study. Government-ran metropolitan schools are failing students. It didn’t give a solution.

And yes, Black parents that have been able to see their children attend great schools where they were not afraid of being killed or maimed every day, while their grades improved and they were, for once. being told that they could achieve the American dream are huge advocates for vouchers. So why would you not want to listen to them?

i read the article you posted and addressed every single point. If that is your argument against school vouchers, I would rather listen to the parents of the children that are benefitting.

Vouchers aren’t perfect, but a good school means everything. Why would you not want poor kids to get a chance at a good education?

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:11 pm

@ROLLERGIRL

Not an attendee of any mosque, just someone that notice how whack you are!

ROLLERGIRL

November 17th, 2009
4:13 pm

ME: most so-called “palestinians” are muslim

allah gal X: More than 40% of the Palestinians are Christians

Webster: most; adj… in the greatest quantity, amount, measure, degree, or number

60% is more than 40%, and the 40% are powerless because of the 60% pedophile worshippers and their penchant for blowing up those that say screw you to their revered pedophile mohammed

Bosch

November 17th, 2009
4:13 pm

NIF,

Left you some comments downstairs

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:14 pm

@ROLLERGIRL

How would you know about the mosque in the West End?
Is that part of your “stroll?”

Nothing Is Free

November 17th, 2009
4:14 pm

Jay

**continued expansion makes Israel look like the party that is refusing to negotiate in good faith.**

How many years did they negotiate in good faith? Did they achieve any concessions, or better yet, did they enjoy any type of peace from the suicide attacks and the rocket attacks?

it’s a two way street. Until I see concessions from Palestine and a cease of attacks on Israeli citizens, I support Israel completely.

Mrs. Godzilla

November 17th, 2009
4:16 pm

off topic

c street house of the “family” just had its tax exempt status pulled

Taxpayer

November 17th, 2009
4:16 pm

I can follow redneck convert’s parody but Rollergirl is like the mystery meat in those weird meals that they served up in the school cafeteria back in the day — you want to know but you don’t want to know and another option would be even better. Then again, maybe they still serve it up.

Del

November 17th, 2009
4:18 pm

Does anyone remember those video clips showing the Palestinians cheering in the streets just after 9-11. They aren’t our friends and never have nor will they ever be. Just another failure in Obama’s foreign relations policy or lack thereof.

ROLLERGIRL

November 17th, 2009
4:18 pm

Jackie, simple..sometimes one has to drive thru the ghetto..the mosque/temple to terrorism and pedophilia… is a red brick building next to what may have been the original huddle house , and some store that sells socks 20 pairs for 6 bucks..I guess they need a lot of socks in the ghetto.

pat

November 17th, 2009
4:18 pm

I frequently wonder why Jews tend to be yellow dog democrats when so many non- jewish democrat are so openly antisemetic?

If we want to sever ties with Israel we will have to sever ties Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan, etc. first. Israel is our eyes, ears and more importantly guns in that region. Israel has carte blanc and they know it. Further, they knew obama is against them, so they are testing him.

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:19 pm

@NIF

You indicate that your support Israel until the Palestinians make “concessions.”

Would you care to elaborate on your list of concessions?

Taxpayer

November 17th, 2009
4:19 pm

Cut Isreal loose and let them sink or swim on their own if they cannot accept the terms that we impose in exchange for our help. Their choice.

Bosch

November 17th, 2009
4:20 pm

NIF,

No, you did not address every point in that article – and the ones you did are your opinion, not fact.

I want all kids to get a good education, poor, rich, white, black, purple – and I do not think private schools are the panacea to this problem. We should invest to fix the schools we have – the ones who help all children, not just the ones who can get into and afford private schools.

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:20 pm

@ROLLERGIRL

They probably do need lots of socks in the ghetto. Let’s just hope that when you “stroll” through, you don’t spout this vile screed to someone; you may get to wear of pair of those socks on your hip.

Taxpayer

November 17th, 2009
4:21 pm

c street house of the “family” just had its tax exempt status pulled

Well, it’s a good start.

Nothing Is Free

November 17th, 2009
4:22 pm

Bosch

**Left you some comments downstairs**

I know. I addressed those points here. I addressed every single point that your one link made.

I’m completely amazed at your last comment: “but this, in no uncertain terms proves that Democrats are somehow keeping black kids from a good education. ”

According to the parents of the Black children that have benefitted from vouchers, you are wrong. I still don’t see any sort of valid point that would discredit the idea of vouchers. You are simply saying that the status quo is good enough. I disagree.

josef nix

November 17th, 2009
4:22 pm

Palestinian Christians have left Palestine in such massive numbers that they now no longer constitute a majority of any Palestinian city including Bethlehem, Their number is placed at between 50-100,000 in areas designated to form the Palestinian state, this is 1-3% of the population. The Palestinian Christian population of the State of Israel is estimated between 150 and 200,000 or 2-3% of the total population, roughly the percentage of Jews in the United States.

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:22 pm

@Del

I don’t remember, neither do I think that you do.

Common Sense

November 17th, 2009
4:22 pm

The day we abandon Israel is the day God abandon’s us ………. if He hasn’t already.

P.S. He’s a closet Muslim

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:24 pm

@josef nix

You do believe the West Bank has become a area much like that of apartheid South Africa?

AmVet

November 17th, 2009
4:24 pm

pat, it is indeed a quandry isn’t it?

Why American Jews overwhelmingly vote against Republicans.

And at the risk of sounding like the new but not at all improved, and once banned Vandy Girl, one can’t even use the same argument as they apply to all those lazy and shiftless blacks, who are ostensibly too stupid to know better…

But I loved to hear the thoughts of some of the so-called conservatives here explaining this…

pat

November 17th, 2009
4:25 pm

NIF, every time Israel negotiated in good faith, they suffered a rash of suidcide bombings….I think they are over the “good faith” thing.

All the palestinians have to do is renounce terror and recognize Israel’s right to exist. The negotiations have been made, that is all they have to do to solve this problem. The resolve of their hate is so strong that they will impoverish thier own people and put them in harms way rather than have peace. They hate Jews so much, that they will not even recognize thier right to exist. On the flip side, they are so pathetically inept at war that all they are capable of is skirmishes and openly targeting innocent men, women and children. It’s hard to feel bad for somebody who puts themselves in a bad position and refuses to get out. They have a choice, they have chosen to call for the destruction of Israel rather than peace.

Del

November 17th, 2009
4:25 pm

Jackie,

Well I would think you were more than just a gleam in your daddy’s eye during 9-11. Yeah…I do remember.

Bosch

November 17th, 2009
4:25 pm

NIF,

No, you didn’t address all the points, and again you are presenting your opinion, not facts – not even valid conclusions.

Of course you don’t see a valid point to the opposition of school vouchers because you think education in this country should be privatized, am I right?

“According to the parents of the Black children that have benefitted from vouchers, you are wrong.”

I’m not disputing that school vouchers have helped some children, but as a general rule, I feel it is wrong for this country to put tax payer money into privatizing education. It’s not the right solution in my opinion.

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:26 pm

@NIF

Where did you get your numbers to validate that black parents believe vouchers are best for education of children. What benefit does a voucher offer?

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:28 pm

@Del

Not an answer, nor have you presented any facts about my daddy’s eye.

Jackie

November 17th, 2009
4:30 pm

@pat

The Palestinians have renounced violence and have publicly stated they believe in Israel’s right to exists.

Even Yasser Arafat committed to Rabin before he was killed by a Jewish extremist.

Nothing Is Free

November 17th, 2009
4:31 pm

Bosch

**We should invest to fix the schools we have – the ones who help all children, not just the ones who can get into and afford private schools.**

When we start investing in those schools, I’ll be right there with you. But we are not. So why punish yet another generation while we wait?

**No, you did not address every point in that article – and the ones you did are your opinion, not fact.**

What facts would you like? You present a very biased form from the National School Board Association, and I present articles from Harvard, The Washington Times, CNN and a Wisconsin newspaper, but you completely discount that.

And you wonder why most conservatives won’t give in to your demands for proof of every single thing we say.

Bosch

November 17th, 2009
4:31 pm

NIF,

These are the issues you failed to address:

No academic advantage in publicly‐funded voucher programs

A 2001 GAO report to Congress confirmed that the official, state‐mandated and state‐funded evaluations of the Milwaukee and Cleveland voucher programs “found little or no difference in voucher and public school students’ performance.”i The same report also cast doubt on the validity of research that claimed positive academic benefits from vouchers, noting that the studies of Milwaukee and Cleveland by pro‐voucher researchers Jay Greene and Paul Peterson contained flaws so significant that GAO could not include the results.

Kim Metcalf, the state‐contracted researcher for the Cleveland program, found that students who attended private schools that were established to take advantage of the voucher program (fulfilling the free market theory that new schools will emerge to meet demand) were outperformed academically by their public school peers in all academic subjects.ii
Meanwhile, a Congressionally‐mandated evaluation of the federally‐funded Washington, D.C. voucher program has twice found no statistically significant differences in academic achievement between voucher students and their public school peers.iii

Pro‐voucher research on privately‐funded voucher programs debunked

With research on taxpayer‐funded voucher programs unhelpful to their cause, voucher advocates have also funded research into privately‐funded voucher programs seeking evidence to support their claims. And despite trumpeting findings from research into programs in New York City and Dayton (Ohio) the pro‐voucher claims unraveled under scrutiny. For example, the aforementioned Peterson promoted academic gains for African‐American students in the New York City program during the 2000 presidential campaign, only to see the policy research company that gathered and analyzed the data call those claims “premature.”iv That was followed by Princeton University researchers who reanalyzed the data and concluded that the so‐called gains for voucher students were statistically insignificant and the previous claims could be substantiated only by excluding achievement results of 44 percent of the students in the experiment.v Meanwhile, the Dayton portion of the Peterson study ended after two years because too few voucher students remained in the private schools for any data to be statistically relevant.vi

National studies undermine claims of private schools’ superiority

Three separate studies in recent years have turned conventional wisdom on its head regarding the long‐held assumption that private schools are “better” than public schools. University of Illinois researchers found that when factoring in demographic and socioeconomic status, public school students at every income level outperformed private school students on the 4th grade and 8th grade math exams for the 2000 National Assessment of Educational Progress.vii A U.S. Department of Education study released in 2006 also found that after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic differences, public school students performed about evenly with private school students on the 2003 NAEP exam. Specifically, public school students outperformed private school pupils by a statistically significant margin on 4th grade math, were outperformed by private school pupils by a statistically significant margin on 8th grade reading, and performed about equally to private school students on 4th grade reading and 8th grade math.viii One year later, a study for the Center on Education Policy examined a nationally representative sample of low‐income students attending urban high schools, and, after controlling for socioeconomic and parental involvement factors, found that public school students performed at the same academic level as private school students, were as likely to attend college, to be satisfied in their jobs and to be as civic‐minded in their 20s.

Common Sense

November 17th, 2009
4:31 pm

To Pat:

Exactly !!!

Nothing Is Free

November 17th, 2009
4:33 pm

Jackie

I posted four different articles downstairs, three of them addressing vouchers and the other addressing the horrible conditions in our metropolitan schools. I had to repost them as four different posts so they would post, so please forgive me for not wanting to repeat that.

jt

November 17th, 2009
4:34 pm

ROLLERGIRL-

Do you prefer pivot, blocking, or jamming?

Do players routinely switch positions?

Are you pictured on the Atlanta RollerGirls homepage?

When is your next Derby?

Bosch

November 17th, 2009
4:34 pm

NIF,

Again, the study from Harvard did not conclude that school vouchers are the solution to the problem of minority children in metropolitan areas – which the study was about.

Again, you are trying to force their conclusion to meet your own.

The other articles were simply pro voucher articles – nothing – nothing on an analysis of the program.

Common Sense

November 17th, 2009
4:34 pm

To Bosch:

Why did the president put his kids in private school ? If you say “for security” it’s bogus. The Secret Service can secure any school.

ROLLERGIRL

November 17th, 2009
4:34 pm

One senior government official said that Netanyahu was “willing to show the greatest possible restraint concerning building in the territories, and has even received praise for that restraint. But that is in the West Bank.
Gilo is in Jerusalem, and that is the capital.”

Netanyahu is an ace at the political game..B. Hussein is in over his head. From bowing to inferiors like the emperor of japan (inferior national status, not inferior to obama himself..obama commands no respect ..the country does) to being punked by Bart Stupak on abortion thus setting up a huge fight within his own party, to the glowing piece in Der Spiegel “obama lied to europe” , this calligulan kenyan is going down in flames.

Jimmy Carter

November 17th, 2009
4:35 pm

stands for decibels

November 17th, 2009
4:07 pm

You say it’s a “draw for The Stupids” yet here you are, posting you little heart out. Coincidence?

Bosch

November 17th, 2009
4:35 pm

NIF,

“What facts would you like?”

Any. Any at all.

Bud Wiser

November 17th, 2009
4:37 pm

To say there is a ‘breach’ between Obowo and Israel is a racist remark against Obowo. Any criticism against our stooping figurehead is racist.

Jimmy Carter said so, so it must be so.

I sit here listening to the staggering numbers coming from Hank Greenberg, former CEO of AIG, about how AIG is getting away with stealing billions from the taxpayers when we ’saved’ them (because they were too big to fail, dontcha know), and I wonder how so many from the Bush and Obowo administrations are not on the way to filling up that empty Illinois prison before the terrorists get there.

Oh wait.

That means Obowo would have to investigate his own administration for corruption, since they tossed the most money at AIG. Odds on that one?

Snowballs shall freeze in Hell before this corrupt group of criminals in Washington shine a light on their own power grubbing activities.

But….thank God there are a few, mostly at Fox, that show how deep and wide it is, and it is just not Democrats either for you moonbats who just fainted.

Impeach the idiot, before he destroys anything else.