You know, it takes a lot to generate sympathy for a sex offender. But Georgia’s draconian laws about where sex offenders can live are doing the trick. It’s downright ridiculous.
“A group of homeless sex offenders who had been living in tents in the woods behind an office park near Marietta were told they had to leave the land by Tuesday.
“We don’t want to allow anyone to live on our property for liability issues,” said Mark McKinnon, a spokesman for the Georgia Department of Transportation, which owns the wooded land where the sex offenders had taken residence.
Several men said their probation officers had told them about the encampment as a kind of last resort for homeless sex offenders trying to meet the strict residency requirements of their probation.
Georgia’s law prohibits the state’s 16,000 sex offenders from living, working or loitering within 1,000 feet of schools, churches, child care facilities and other areas where children gather. It limits the locations where they can live….
William Hawkins, 34, a registered sex offender living in the camp, gathered his belongings Tuesday.
He’s not sure where he’s going to go.
When Hawkins was 15 years old, he had sex with a 12-year-old in Florida and received two years of house arrest and 10 years’ probation. “I have a 19-year-old case. Technically, I don’t think I have to be on it,” Hawkins said of the sex offender registry.”
The law hounding those people has no real purpose but to, well, hound them. As experts have testified to the Georgia Legislature, it serves little or no protective function. A sexual predator intent on finding victims will do so, regardless of where he (or occasionally she) is forced to live. Furthermore, unlike many states, Georgia law makes no distinction between somebody like Hawkins and somebody who has a history of true predation.
An even better example is Wendy Whitaker, who as a 17-year-old was caught performing oral sex on a 15-year-old classmate. That incident back in 1996 put her on the same sex offender list as a multiple rapist, As The Economist recently pointed out in an article featuring Whitaker as an example:
“The Georgia Sex Offender Registration Review Board, an official body, assessed a sample of offenders on the registry last year and concluded that 65% of them posed little threat. Another 30% were potentially threatening, and 5% were clearly dangerous.”
Given that reality, throwing them all into the same bag and forcing them to live together in surreptitious little communities helps no one. If serious threats must be freed, restrict their movements and track them closely. But don’t pretend that they’re all the same. Law enforcement officials have already told legislators that the law is overly strict, forcing officers to spend precious time tracking low-risk offenders that could better be spent elsewhere. But politicians passed the law as an act of grandstanding, and so far they haven’t summoned the courage to correct it.
Of course, much of the rest of the world is more intrigued by the case of Roman Polanksi, who hasn’t exactly been living in a tent city in the 32 years since he drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl. Ann Woolner, a columnist for Bloomberg, explores that case and reaches what I think is the right conclusion:
“The shame is that it has taken this long to sort everything out. The blame for that lies with Polanski for refusing to answer for evading the law.
Celebrate the man’s talent, honor his contributions to filmmaking. However gifted he is, Polanski’s art can’t serve as a reason to ignore his terrible crime or his refusal to answer for it.”
The injustice done to the Wendy Whitakers of the world, and maybe to the William Hawkins, far outweigh any alleged unfairness to Polanski.
UPDATE: I should note that my colleague Cynthia Tucker has also weighed in on the Polanski case, reaching a verdict similar to Woolner’s.
“It’s important for Polanski to face the bar of justice, even thirty years late. His appearance would serve as an example to others among the wealthy and glamorous that they are not above the law. Neither money, fame, connections nor artistic achievement should excuse you from facing up to your crimes. Forcing Polanski into court, in a case which will receive lots of media attention, might also stiffen the resolve of other victims of sexual violence who are trying to find the courage to face their abusers.”
364 comments Add your comment
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
8:40 am
this is the problem with the race to be the “toughest on crime” – all the cases that aren’t quite so black and white get chucked in with the real horror stories.
GEORGE AMERICAN
September 30th, 2009
8:45 am
I LOVED THE CHANCE TO CAMP OUT EVERYDAY, BUT I HAVE TO WORK TO PAY MY TAXES!!! WE HAVE TO STAY TOUGH ON THESE CRIMINALS TO KEEP THEM FROM CRIMES!!!
BUILD MORE PRISONS IF THERE IS NO PLACE FOR THESE CRIMINALS. JUST LIKE “ILLEGALS” WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT “CONVICTED FELLIN”???
GEORGIA NEEDS MORE PRISONS AND 3-STRIKES (AND I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE BRAVES (HA HA HA!!!)
Joey
September 30th, 2009
8:48 am
Something that Jay and I can agree on.
3rd Party Guy
September 30th, 2009
8:50 am
This law is worse than ridiulous, it’s sickening. It is just another example of how politicians can pretend to be doing something to solve a problem. It then gives someone a mandate to be a do-gooder without requiring the common sense to take logical action. Go government!
jt
September 30th, 2009
8:50 am
“But don’t pretend that they’re all the same.”
The only time a lefty will proclaim the sanctity of individualism concerns sex crimes.
Go figure.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
8:51 am
sex offenders living in tents, Roman Polanski fighting extradition
and the SOB who introduced me to adult sexuality at age 4 walks about free and unencumbered.
yep, we have problems with sex offender laws.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
8:52 am
“The only time a lefty will proclaim the sanctity of individualism concerns sex crimes”….there’s your sign!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
8:54 am
I was wondering if you were gonna jump into this story. I’m almost certain that by the time I post this, Andy will have accused you of supporting child rape, but the part of this story I find really crazy is the fact that their probation officers directed them to this camp. That tells me that there is absolutely no place for these people to go. So, I guess their only alternative is to wonder the streets and most likely repeat their offenses.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
8:54 am
Jay
You make decent money. How about you taking them in? That would be really great. Finally you would be actually doing something instead of just complaining about other people.
Let us know where you want to keep them so we can all bring by some good porn for them to watch.
America. What a country.
Jackie
September 30th, 2009
8:56 am
It appears these laws are extra-Constitutional.
It is the scarlet-letter concept, if the individual has served their sentence, they are further punished by not allowing them to start their new life as a convicted felon.
Politicians do what they think will help them get re-elected, not what is in the best interest of societal norms.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
8:59 am
I think they should be allowed to camp out on Congressional grounds. After all, we may as well get some use out of the space and we know that it meets all the restrictions that are imposed to date on sex offenders, don’t we?
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
8:59 am
Jackie
Actually child molesters are not ever cured. they are punished, but every piece I have seen done on child molesters say that they cannot be reformed.
So you may want to consider that children who live around these people are always a potential victim. And from that perspective, can you see why parents would not want them living next door?
Richard Cash
September 30th, 2009
9:01 am
Jay, Invite them to stay with you. Then you can invite all the other lawbreakers to live with you too. I’m sure if that did happen, you would expect the tax payers to pay for that also. You are a trip man…….
Where The Sheep Have No Name
September 30th, 2009
9:01 am
Let the libs open up their backyards and basements for these offenders to live in. Have their wives make iced tea and cook for them, too. Let them upstairs (after the kids have gone to school, of course) to take a shower and brush their teeth. Teach them how to sing “Kum-ba-ya” with the family. Let them borrow the family car (with the “Kerry For President”, “O”, “Co-Exist”, and “End This War” bumper stickers) so that they can look for jobs. Feel good about yourselves that you are helping your fellow man. Forgive them when they rape your daughter.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:02 am
NIF, you seem unusually angry this morning…somebody steal your tent?
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:02 am
Brad Steel
I would just as soon they stay in jail. And I don’t have a porn collection. Do you?
So I’m a tool for who?
godless heathen
September 30th, 2009
9:02 am
These sex offender laws are about the stupidest laws ever passed by our legislators and that’s saying something. What difference does it make if you force a perve to live 1000 feet from anywhere kids are? Sex crimes are usually not perpetrated on strangers, but rather in a “family” or acquaintance situation.
I’m sure the morons in the legislature went home bragging about how they were tough on sex offenders to “protect the children”. All show and no sense. Similar to many of our drug and gun zero tolerance laws.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:03 am
Now, if they can just figure out how to punish people that have abortions, the USofA will be almost Perfect. It’ll just need a zip code so people will know where to flock.
Gale
September 30th, 2009
9:03 am
Liz and Joey, single payor ressponse downstairs. Crimess committed as minors should not condemn a person to a sex offender list for life. Adolescents will experiment with sex. It happens. It does not make them predators. Now, if the act was actually rape, not statutory rape, and did include a violent act, punish the violence and do not assume the person is a sexual predator.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:04 am
Normal
Actually I am having a great day. Another day of watching the dims failing miserably. What could be better?
How about you?
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:04 am
NiF –
“Actually child molesters are not ever cured. they are punished, but every piece I have seen done on child molesters say that they cannot be reformed.”
I agree with you – that’s what the studies seem to show.
however, as the article states, above, not everyone who is on the sex offender list would fall into that category (like the woman mentioned in Jay’s article).
godless heathen
September 30th, 2009
9:04 am
Gitmo
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:05 am
from below:
A Democrat Prez, Democrat controlled House, Democrat controlled Senate, and they can’t even get this bill out of committee.
That’s because the Democrats aren’t asleep at the wheel as the Republicans were from 1994-2006. It’s a lot easier to get things done when your Republican Senators all follow the shepard call of the party leaders. Sheeple Republicans. No wonder our country was practically ruined under their leadership.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:06 am
Let the Republicans pay taxes to keep offenders off the street. They seem to like to mandate as long as it does not impose any restrictions on them, including paying for their mandates.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:06 am
NIF,
There is a difference between child molestor and sex offender. I guess you chose not to read Jay’s article.
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
9:07 am
Barretta said it best “don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time”
just sayin’ 
Damn Skippy!
Why don’t we just ship them to Mexico? They ship thier crimminals here…
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:08 am
godess heathern
**Sex crimes are usually not perpetrated on strangers, but rather in a “family” or acquaintance situation.**
An acquaintance like a neighbor? The little girl that lives down the street and walks past their house every day in order to catch the bus?
Apparently, not many liberals on here have ever had kids of their own. They just want the parents among us to deal with their kindness to the worst in our culture.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:08 am
NIF, I’m having a great day too…watching all the whiners whine and never offering alternate solutions…now that’s entertainment!
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:08 am
They can’t all live at Larry Craig’s house?
I Report/ Vast White Wing Conspirator (-: You Whine )-:
September 30th, 2009
9:08 am
Out of all the people in the world that need voices speaking out for them, the enslaved women and children of Islam and the oppressed dehumanized people of North Korea quickly come to mind, why do liberals always pound their chests on behalf of perverts (your beloved justice system saw fit to punish them, same as they saw fit to legalize the murder of unborn children, so there must be something to it, no?) and the like?
Just sayin…..
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:09 am
Bosch
i read Jay’s article, but Bosch, I don’t discuss anything with a liar, like you.
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
9:09 am
Can’t they go camp out in the Okeefeefanokee swamp? Sounds like a better place to camp to me!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:10 am
NIF,
How ’bout if I come fluff the pillows on your swooning couch?
Lynders
September 30th, 2009
9:12 am
I look at it this way. If Georgia has tough laws I agree with them. I was physically and sexually abused as a child by my own stepfather and know how it feels. But I also see kids that shouldn’t be dressed as they do,or allowed to be out on the streets after dark either. Where’s the prosecution of the parents?
BUT, what if offenders live and work in the state of Georgia, and have some type of registration in Georgia then? Georgia ought to be providing a place for them to work and stay to be a functional member of society until such a time that they can re-enter society and live on their own. How about a Farm with a woodshop, metal shop or something like that?
Thats not to say Georgia should support them, but if they weren’t retrained and placed somewhere outside of prison, just where do they expect them to live with the meager cash they get when they get out? Either that, or transport them in agreement with another state. The one guy highlighted in the article was only 15 yrs old when he committed the crime and the girl was 12….why did they not prosecute HIS parents?
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:13 am
Normal
Only far lefties seem to think that another solution is needed.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:14 am
Whiner,
please feel free to give to charities that support the oppressed people of Islam and North Korea. There are no laws restricting you from doing that.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:14 am
NIF,
Such hate filled vomit.
CWILLI
September 30th, 2009
9:15 am
Not all are truly sex offenders, some were entrapped not saying they would not have committed the crime, but how can you put someone in jail put them on a list for life and they never committed the actual crime. The old saying idle mind is the devils play ground, yes I know of someone who did a stupid thing, he was working being a good father to his children, because work was slow one day told to go home. Went home got on the internet and went into a chat room and there pops this girl talking this person never really stated age if so I really didn’t pay attention in the chat room when signing up it states you must be 18 so this person lied, so we decide to meet soon as this person goes tothe desinated meeting place police arrested him. Now tell me where is the crime truly. Now this person can’t get a job, went to church was ran out of the church life just destroyed now he is unable to take care of his children and he has to register for life. This is ridiculous them good old boy legislators need to get a grip. But we all need to stand together find out who they are and let them know votes do count. And don’t get me wrong someone who has actually committed the act of ray or having sex with a child I totally agree with the law. But what about the young prostitues out on the street who say they are 18 or older only 13 & 14 and actually someone these young girls want this, some of these young girls who are out there having sex want to do it. It hasn’t been that long ago where young girs were encouraged toget married at 13 & 14 to keep from being old maids and that was in the United States of America.
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
9:15 am
Jay, perhaps you might share your humble abode with a few of them?
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:16 am
Lynders
I understand what you saying about the parents, but you just can’t lock your kids up because liberals don’t want to lock up the bad guys.
NRB
September 30th, 2009
9:16 am
Only the AJC could stoop low enough to defend child molestors.
Slow news day, kookman? Don’t you have kids yourself? Not only should you be ashamed, you should be fired.
Jackie
September 30th, 2009
9:16 am
@NIF
In that sex offenders are never cured, I agree. However, do you think rapists, bank robbers and other repeat offenders are cured?
Given this question, what should we do with those that continue to repeat crimes?
If one would look at things objectively, if a person is killed and the perpetrator is charged with manslaughter or murder, is the victim still dead?
I believe we should structure punishment that is reflective of the crimes committed.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:16 am
What would Jesus say to his lost children in the forests?
Would he not weep that people, little different from the tarnished ones, have chosen to throw them into the wild?
I think he would have a wag of the finger to the ninnies who choose to banish people who have paid their dues already.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:16 am
Lynders,
The problem is that all sex offenders are not child molesters and should not be all grouped together.
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
9:18 am
Finnius. Along with the thousands of homeless/bums you have helped perhaps you might help a few of these sex offenders.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:18 am
The problem is that the sex offenders must continue to move in order to meet the Republican mandates and, in the case of the camp on public property, people with children that have lost their jobs in this Republican-created recession have probably started moving there. So, the offenders must go, again. Even the ones that pose no threat to anyone.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
9:19 am
I had to google Megan’s Law to verify what I’d suspected–it’s been nearly twenty years, now, since I started wondering about where the efforts to isolate men who’d already “paid their debt to society” would end up. I guess if you’d asked me back then to say it’d be some embarrassing tent city, I might’ve laughed and said “surely it won’t come to that.”
Well it’s come to that.
Like you say, Jay, obviously there should be the ability to monitor the activities of these offenders once they’ve served their time. But the insane laws restricting where they are permitted to live should’ve been deemed unconstitutional a long time ago.
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
9:19 am
Finnius, how would you know what Jesus would say? Stop parroting the stupid comments, you hear each Sunday, that are babbled by your even more stupid minister.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:21 am
NIF,
Bosch ruined your night, didn’t he? He got under your skin bad!
Go Bosch!!
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:22 am
Jackie
**However, do you think rapists, bank robbers and other repeat offenders are cured?**
it’s very simple. Robbing a bank does not screw up a child for the rest of their life. Can you see the difference?
And Bank robbing is not a mental illness. So yes, they can be taught that robbing banks is bad.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:23 am
Finn,
This little tyrade is a record I do believe.
Wow.
BR
September 30th, 2009
9:23 am
I say these punk sex offenders gave up all their rights when they violated a young girls or boys rights. I have no mercy for sex offenders and neither do people in prison. The state needs to continue to be tough on these animals.
Jay
September 30th, 2009
9:23 am
Please cease the personal attacks on each other.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:23 am
Bosch –
“i read Jay’s article, but Bosch, I don’t discuss anything with a liar, like you.” and “Go take your little boy tantrums to someone who cares, liar.”
… sounds like someone has a cruuuuuush on yooouuuuu …
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
9:24 am
OK, I’ll be good
I Report/ Vast White Wing Conspirator (-: You Whine )-:
September 30th, 2009
9:24 am
please feel free to give to charities that support the oppressed people of Islam and North Korea. There are no laws restricting you from doing that.
I’m sure that will do alot of good, Taxxie, who do you suppose distributes this charity to the concentration camp inmates?
I got an idea, why don’t you fascist pinko liberals spend as much time denouncing the butchers of Islam than you do Christians in the United States?
Skeered, are you?
Big brave lib, fighting churchgoers.
Brad Steel
September 30th, 2009
9:24 am
Ridiculous convictions of horny teenagers, wildly over-crowded prisons with non-violent pot sellers.
Thanks Reagan-era get-tough-on-crime crowd and your pandering politicians. Your conservative movement laws have done for the criminal justice system what your deregulation laws did for the economy.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:25 am
Well, I just hope that this conversation does not degrade into a discussion about whether a former Republican is ever truly cured. I just don’t want to go there. I’m cured for as long as the Republicans are what they are today. And, that’s a fact. And, no amount of temptation will sway me. They can say no and they say no more taxes and they can say drill here and they can say freedom fries and on and on and it’s not working.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:25 am
BR,
Some of these sex offenders did not necessarily violate a young girl or boys rights.
Again: sex offender does not automatically equate to child molester – a child molester is a type of sex offender, but they are not mutually exclusive.
Barry
September 30th, 2009
9:27 am
Bookman is 100 percent correct on this one, and every one of the pandering politicians who put these laws in place knows it. But none of those politicians has the guts to fix this problem, so it’s likely we’re stuck with it until the courts strike down these absurd distance restrictions. Then just watch those same spineless politicians run for re-election while complaining about “activist judges.”
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
9:27 am
Here’s a question….
How many of us had underage sex? With an underage partner?
RealTalk
September 30th, 2009
9:27 am
What a Joke of an Article to read this morning. Jay Bookman your a Joke. I love the AJC, even if I can’t stand Cynthia Tucker and her nonsense.I am a life long Atlantan.I have ZERO sympathy for Child Molesters, and am waiting for our Society to have a better policy towards them. Our Laws are fine and child molesters should suffer.Their Vicitms never get over it. They are very sick and can NEVER be reformed. Look at the Stats. We need to eliminate all child molesters or rapist by jail or Death. Period. Our Society will be better off and our children will be safer.How is that bad? Liberal or Conservative taxpayers want to protect our children. Vicims never truly recover while offenders are let back out to commit the same crime. The Internet also gives these monsters another outlet to prey on our children. We all need to have an adult discussion on better ways to protect our familes.
Our Goverment does not protect us anymore. It is time the people to stand up. The Supreme Court rulled recently that Child Molesters can not be put to death, unless murder was involved.What a Joke. Shame on Them. The Death Penalty should be for those Monsters. They Have no rights. You lose your rights when you hurt children. Lets Rid our country of these monsters. A Country that doesn’t have Child Molesters or rapist. That is Real Change you can Believe in. Wake Up America and Atlanta.
OR Maybe we can just ship them all to Iran or Cuba for a New Start.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:27 am
USinUK
Can’t tell the difference between someone who is disgusted by the lack of a backbone of another individual and someone who has a crush on someone. I see.
You don’t actually vote, do you?
Sally E.
September 30th, 2009
9:28 am
As a victim of child molestation, I don’t have sympathy for the offenders but fair is fair. Why continue to punish them after they’ve served their sentence? If you want to track their whereabouts for life, then sentence them to a life sentence. Also, their should be some common sense exercised in adding offenders to the registry. Some people clearly do not deserve to be on that list.
RW-(the original)
September 30th, 2009
9:28 am
Enter your comments here–
How come Wendy never ventured into the parts of the forest I visit? And in 1996 wasn’t she basically following a Presidential directive?
Oh well, I’ve got to head to the forest right now so I’ll report back later if I find any strange camping arrangements. By the way, these people can camp anywhere that isn’t marked “no camping” in a National forest.
Nan
September 30th, 2009
9:29 am
I noticed a lot of the commenters here are doing the same thing the moronic legislature did: lump all sex “offenders” in together, regardless of the crime, which means a teenager who crossed the statutory rape line by having sex with a girlfriend or boyfriend only a year younger than him or her is treated the same way as a true sicko who abused small children. It’s absolutely senseless from a humane perspective, and it’s idiotic from the point of view of law enforcement. It forces registered offenders into a transient lifestyle, which makes it much, much harder for law enforcement to know where the most potentially dangerous offenders actually are. If a person cannot find a legal, decent place to live that person is going to be tempted to go underground — buy a fake ID, change his or her identity, and drop off the radar. Illegal aliens buy false identifications all the time — what’s to stop a pedophile from doing the same when he gets tired of huddling in a tent or living under a bridge?
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:29 am
Jay, it’s time for another thread. There are people here who don’t know the difference between a predator and an offener. These “enlightened” ones have degenerated into name calling, insults and plain weird actions. Wait! That happened last time too, didn’t it? And the time before that? and the time….Oh never mind!
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
9:29 am
HERE IS THE ANSWER! GET CONVICTED OF A SEX CRIME, THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN BE FORGIVEN IS TO GO TO AFGHANISTAN AS A WARRIOR! GET A BODY COUNT OF OVER 100 AND YOU CAN SAFELY COME BACK TO SOCIETY!
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
9:29 am
How many of us according to the law, were sex offenders on Prom night?
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:30 am
Mrs. Godzilla
What you and others seem to want to center this discussion on is apparently very rare. The vast majority of sex offenders are exactly that: sex offenders.
Change the sentencing laws but don’t let the pervs out.
Peadawg
September 30th, 2009
9:30 am
It depends on the case. If a 35 yr old has sex w/ a 15 yr…put him in jail and let him have to watch out when he drops the soap.
If a 16 yr old has consensual sex w/ a 15 yr old…if it was really consensual, than nothing should be done.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
9:30 am
ANybody?
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:30 am
Give whiner. Give ’til it hurts. It is the christian churchgoer thing to do, isn’t it. Now, go ahead and show us all how much charity you have in your heart. Show us what all those teachings from the good book have done for you, I mean, for those less fortunate than you. Don’t be skeered.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:31 am
My my, so many hard-working, tax-paying, upstanding middle and upper class citizens on the blog.
And how angry they all are!
Finding it hard to make ends meet, scrimping and saving and making all your payments on time but still can’t get ahead? And I suppose it doesn’t help after your beloved Republicans allowed business men to screw the pooch and empty out your 401k’s?
Hmm, maybe we should legalize prostitution or drugs so you unhappy people can find an outlet for your hate and bile?
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
9:31 am
NORMAL YOU ARE RIGHT, WE CAN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE! (A PREDATOR IS A DRONE AIRCRAFT, AN OFFENER? ISN’T THAT A DECENT IPA FROM OREGON?) :ROLL:
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
9:31 am
C’mon guys? ANybody?
Not so Gullible
September 30th, 2009
9:32 am
Enter your comments here Don’t you notice how Jay loves to spout off about a hot button issue so all the sheep will respond on his blog. This gives the AJC an excuse to charge advertisers for “Hits”. If everyone would keep their fingers off the keyboard, pretty soon the AJC would totally get rid of Jay rather then just restrict him to silly activity.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:32 am
Normal
So what’s you solution, Normal? Let all the pervs out? Do you have kids? Do you care about kids? Can you possibly understand that the vast majority of sex offenders did not get charged because of a prom night date?
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:32 am
Mrs. G. I had sex the first time at 14, but the woman was in her 30’s.
If that was sex abuse, I didn’t know it. It was an education to me.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:32 am
NiF – Can’t tell the difference between someone who is disgusted by the lack of a backbone of another individual and someone who has a crush on someone. I see.
… me thinks thou doest protest too much … at any rate, it’s not nearly as bad as the fact that you can’t distinguish the difference between a true pedophile and someone who was put on the sex offenders list because of something that happened when they were a teenager …
“You don’t actually vote, do you?”
every election I can (helloooooo Nov 2010!) … and the fact that it pi$$es off people like you is an added bonus
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
9:33 am
JAY, WHAT DID I SAY? YOU ARE A FUNNY CAT FOR A JOURNALIST, WHICH AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION DO YOU SUPPORT?
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
9:34 am
Please cease the personal attacks on each other.
Ok, but I need a ruling. Is it a “personal attack” to point out that NRB, who writes @ 9.16:
Only the AJC could stoop low enough to defend child molestors.
…is the same man who has now twice defended the child murderer Timothy McVeigh. The same man who says that Timothy was “heroic” and “made the country better”?
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:34 am
whiner, since you’re concerned about the plight of women in the world, here’s some information for you:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/magazine/23Women-sidebar-t.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=%22women%20for%20women%20international%22&st=cse
Choose a woman to lend to on kiva.org. The minimum amount is $25, and you can choose from people all over the world. The money will be used to support a business and will be paid back. Or go to globalgiving.com, find a woman abroad whose cause you identify with and make a small gift. On GlobalGiving, for example, we have supported a program to prevent runaway girls from being trafficked into brothels.
Sponsor a girl abroad through one of the many child-sponsorship organizations. We do so through Plan USA (planusa.org), but there are many other great ones, including Women for Women International (womenforwomen.org).
Become an advocate for change by joining the CARE Action Network at care.org. CARE is now focused on assisting women and girls for the pragmatic reason that that is where it can get the best results. The network helps people speak out and educate policy makers about global poverty.
(the NYT link includes additional links)
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:35 am
I Report writes why don’t you fascist pinko liberals spend as much time denouncing the butchers of Islam than you do Christians in the United States?
I don’t give a dern what other people do in other countries. I don’t live there and it’s none of my business what they do in THEIR OWN LAND. I live in America and I can only affect what happens here. So you can guess, I don’t subscribe to the US as world police idea, either.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:35 am
NIF, the solution is simple, let the ones who were caught up in this mess because they were courious and had underged sex go and get on with their lives. The predator, on the other hand, keep them institutionalized. They are a clear and present danger to children.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:36 am
peadawg –
9:30 –
RAAAAAAMEN
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:39 am
Mrs. G,
I did not wait for the prom but I honestly cannot recall what the laws on the books were back then. The only laws I remember dealing with at the time was whether or not I had a right to not be beat to a pulp by one of my girl friend’s dads. He let me know real quick what my rights were and I was not about to argue with him. Of course, I feel the same way about my daughter. Then again, time and wisdom and circumstances do tend to have an affect on many of us — some good, some bad.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:39 am
Mrs. G –
to answer your 9:27 question … I’m so white-bread … I was in my majority and so was he …
Hef
September 30th, 2009
9:40 am
Me, I don’t want a TRUE sex offender anywhere near my family and friends.For that matter I don’t want them near any family. I don’t have any problem with a TRUE sex offender especialy those who harm children locked away for the rest of their day’s. A couple examples in Mr Bookman’s piece seem extreme,and the laws should be amended in my opinion.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:40 am
USinUk
I’m sure your entire life is based on pi*sing someone off. That usually means that you think very little of yourself. Sorry about that, but not my problem.
I know that there are rare instances that teenagers get charged for something that should be considered nothing. But DO YOU UNDERSTAND that this is not the norm? DO YOU UNDERSTAND that the reason why news stories are made about those people is that they are so incredibly rare?
DO YOU UNDERSTAND that. as a parent, I would rather you do your best to pi*s others off by doing something other than work to free people that will be raping children?
Smile!!
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:40 am
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:32 am
Mrs. G. I had sex the first time at 14, but the woman was in her 30’s.
If that was sex abuse, I didn’t know it. It was an education to me.
Why, you little big man!
getalife
September 30th, 2009
9:42 am
Skipped the prom and went to the party.
At least put them in Stone Mountain camping.
Geez.
William
September 30th, 2009
9:42 am
I have no remorse for a child molester! I do think these laws have become sympathy laws that violate people’s constitutional rights. If you pay for the crime then it should be over. Even Bill O’Reilly is too eager to give everyone a felony for almost any violation of the legal system.
A felony follows the person for life. To me that is punishment beyond the crime. Only a few scenarios would that apply. We as a people should demand criminals be punished, punished quickly, and punished in accordance with the crime. After punishment, the person should be given every opportunity to fit back into society. I do not believe in punishment for a crime not committed nor do I believe you should have the right to assume the person is going to committ a crime in the future.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:42 am
Normal
Of course. What you said is perfect, so you do understand the problem others might have with grouping the rare innocent with all the pervs.
Jackie
September 30th, 2009
9:42 am
@NIF
Any criminal convicted of a crime causes ancillary damage to his and other families.
If the child is traumatized by the crime against a family member, that crime is never forgotten.
Everything that is done has consequences, positive or negative, for children.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
9:45 am
MsGodzilla-Prom Night? How about 9th grade-did’nt have a clue of what I was attempting to do,luckily either did she. Can’t say it was enjoyable,but bragging rights with the guy’s was cool at the time.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:46 am
Normal! Why that’s just so not normal!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mrs. G.,
I’ll take my fifth amendment rights on that one.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
9:46 am
MsGodzilla@8:51-Sorry
Barry
September 30th, 2009
9:46 am
RealTalk, surely you understand that not all registered sex offenders are child molesters. Perhaps you also missed the stats in Bookman’s column in that regard from the Georgia Sex Offender Registration Review Board. That is the basic problem: The current law treats teen offenders (like the referenced Wendy Whitaker) exactly the same as the stereotypical (and extraordinarily rare) predator who snatches a child off the street. By doing so, it makes enforcement more difficult for police, creates “process” offenses that unneccessarily clog the prison system, and – most importantly – MAKES CHILDREN NO SAFER. You would get precisely the same sort of result by passing a law that equates juvenile shoplifting with serial bank robbery, and then requiring anyone committing those crimes and everythihg in between to be placed on a registry that merely labels them all as “thieves.” So: If you like the current sex offender registry, perhaps you should lobby for creation of a “thieves registry.” Then start on a “driving offenses registry” next, where you can lump minor speeders and repeat DUI offenders in the same category.
William
September 30th, 2009
9:46 am
Lets talk about our first time?
david wayne osedach
September 30th, 2009
9:47 am
Miami has a better solution. There the sex offenders get to live under a causeway bridge. Fresh fish from Biscayne bay daily!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:47 am
Nif –
“Justice denied anywhere is justice denied everywhere” – MLK, Jr.
I’m sorry to hear that you don’t care about the people who are unjustly added to the sexual predators list … I’m sure you’d be just as sanguine if it was your daughter who was added to the list for doing something like Wendy did. (”sorry, dear, but people like you are just a small percentage of those on the list, so I can’t be bothered to care about what it means to your life”)
so yes, I do understand that this is not the norm – the difference between you and me (one of many, thank His Noodley Appendages) is that I actually CARE about people who are denied justice.
mm
September 30th, 2009
9:48 am
Jay,
Wow, you found yet another reason for the wingnuts to hide under their beds. Just based on their posts, they’ve already soiled their diapers.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:49 am
The US is a system of laws and we have systems set up for people who break those laws.
Once law breakers do their time, you can’t just ostracize them. You have to allow them the opportunity to improve themselves.
What kind of people just throw up their hands and say “banished”? It takes people who don’t want to deal with the situation at hand to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Those of you who want us to care about the plight of innocent people in foreign lands don’t realize that your allowing your own system to turn into the type of system which produces situations which put innocent people in plight.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
9:49 am
Jackie
I hope you are not equating other crimes with child rape?
Stupid Law
September 30th, 2009
9:51 am
I was 20, she was 15. By the laws today I would have to register since her mom caught us when she was 16. As a side note, Friday will be our 32nd anniversary.
The law is wrong. Zero tolerance is wrong. Politicians, judges, school administrators, teachers and parents need to judge each instance as a unique event. One size does not fit all.
Mrs G, to answer your question, yes on my prom night and yes on her prom night. Lucky for me, people still used a little common sense back then.
jt
September 30th, 2009
9:52 am
These asinine laws and asinine situations are all a product of centralized authority in which all of you lefties crave.
Deal with it.
And if you think the plight of these sex offenders are gruesome, just wait until you fail three consequetive cholerestoral tests under Obama-care.
Fat Gulag.
Washington, Larry Craig, and Barney Frank knows best.
Jackie
September 30th, 2009
9:53 am
@NIF
Where did you get that idea?
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
9:54 am
Barry made a good point – these laws do absolutely nothing to make our children safer, in fact, in my opinion, it makes children more vulnerable. Law enforcement officers don’t have the time to monitor the really dangerous offenders – plus, offenders are left to wander the streets and will most likely repeat their offense so they can get sent back to jail – at least there they have a roof and food.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
9:54 am
And if you think the plight of these sex offenders are gruesome, just wait until you fail three consequetive cholerestoral tests under Obama-care. Fat Gulag.
I think we have a “Farthest Traveled” award nominee. Any seconds?
jt
September 30th, 2009
9:56 am
Normal
September 30th, 2009
9:32 am
Mrs. G. I had sex the first time at 14, but the woman was in her 30’s.
If that was sex abuse, I didn’t know.
Righttttttttt.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
9:56 am
Hmm, sometimes you should make sure the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow really exists before you turn your back on your state, your voters, constituents, and all.
Palin Lectures Not Selling, No One Wants To Book Her: NY Post
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/30/palin-lectures-not-sellin_n_304020.html
Jackie
September 30th, 2009
9:56 am
@NIF
Hit the enter button too quickly.
Having an adult conversation about an adult problem is one thing, for you to think that you can frame the conversation to fit your terms is another.
I will not be drawn into the situation where I try to prove the points that you set forth. Conversation is about GA law and people being made to live in the woods.
If there are other questions about other subjects, feel free to ask; you will get an answer.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
9:57 am
Wait until the Republicans get approval to publish their list of abortion offenders and make it illegal for them to live anywhere. The power of the good book in the wrong hands — Republican hands — is wrong in so many ways. And, we have not even talked about the list of gays and the cross-reference to the list of HIV infected and the places that they are not allowed to go. But, as long as we can keep the sick uninsured, everything will work out in the end.
Paula M
September 30th, 2009
9:59 am
Isn’t there an island or something nearby? We could put some facilities on it, require them to work to pay for most of their own living, and keep them separated from us? Haven’t made this proposal/comment with a lot of thought, just off the top of my head. Some sort of worthless island nearby, maybe that floods sometimes?
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
9:59 am
Jackie –
9:56
nicely done! (golf clap)
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
10:00 am
Good points Bosch. Plus it’s unsafe to head to the woods for relaxation.
Is it Budwiser who is always heading to the woods? Maybe someone should warn him.
Seriously, our national parks are already turning into a roll of the dice whether you will come across a crazed person with bad designs on your life. Look at the number of people who disappear or show dead there every year.
Put an ankle boot on these people and let em live in normal housing.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:01 am
meanwhile … a little good news …
The worst U.S. recession since the Great Depression eased more than anticipated in the second quarter, setting the stage for a recovery to take hold in the last half of 2009.
The world’s largest economy shrank at a 0.7 percent annual rate from April through June, the best performance in more than a year, revised figures from the Commerce Department showed today in Washington. Gross domestic product contracted at a 6.4 percent pace in the first three months of 2009.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=a3g5lqDmy2N8
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
10:01 am
Yes, Jackie, well done –
I need to put that in my “cool blog posts” folder.
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
10:02 am
She’s got me dizzy, she sees me through to the end
She’s got me in her hands and there’s no use in pretending
Christine sixteen, Christine sixteen
She drives me crazy, I want to give her all I’ve got
And she’s hot every day and night, there is no doubt about it
Christine sixteen, Christine sixteen
“I don’t usually say things like this to girls your age, but when I saw you
coming out of the school that day, that day I knew, I knew, I’ve got to have
you, I’ve got to have you.”
She’s’ been around, but she’s young and clean
I’ve got to have her, can’t live without her, whoo no
Christine sixteen, Christine sixteen
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, yeah
So clean, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, Christine, yeah, yeah
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, Christine, yeah, yeah
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, yeah, yeah
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, yeah, yeah
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen, Christine, yeah, yeah
Christine, Christine, sixteen, sixteen
Christine, yeah, yeah, yeah
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
10:02 am
USinUK
**is that I actually CARE about people who are denied justice.**
I’m sure you do. The problem is that you assume that I don’t, because I care much more for children. It’s the basic lib dodge. “Only I can care about anyone because I’m a liberal”. I never said that I wasn’t concerned, but since when did facts get in the way of your finger wagging at others.
See? Sometimes there is more to a conversation that trying your little best at pi*sing the other person off. Once again, this is your problem, not mine.
The media will take care of the extremely rare instance where a teen is charged and there will always be people like you who choose to make those people the poster children for your daily finger wagging. But please pardon me for being concerned that the other 99.99999999% of the child molesters are kept away from children.
You live to pi*s off others. I live to protect children. It’s yet another of those delicious differences that I thank God for every chance I get.
jt
September 30th, 2009
10:03 am
I meant Gulag Fat Glutinus Maximo.
Brad Steel
September 30th, 2009
10:04 am
How many of us had underage sex? With an underage partner?
What are you doing for lunch and how old are you?
lem1970
September 30th, 2009
10:04 am
Finn McCool
If you believe anything from the Huffington post, then you are sure to be misinformed and easily misled
Brad Steel
September 30th, 2009
10:05 am
Reciting lyrics from Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley. That’s just sad.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
10:07 am
I meant Gulag Fat Glutinus Maximo.
Seriously, if there were to be government funded fat farms proposed, they’d be so popular that the private fat farm owners would have the offending bill sponsors shot.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:07 am
NiF –
“The problem is that you assume that I don’t, because I care much more for children.”
ahhhh … the classic righty binary thinking – that you can only care for one thing and not the other. believe it or not, you CAN care for children AND care that justice is served by not punishing people beyond fairness.
“Sometimes there is more to a conversation that trying your little best at pi*sing the other person off.”
yep – there’s logic, empathy, and rhetoric. you seem to be lacking all three.
and, like I said – pi$$ing off people like you isn’t my raison d’etre, but it is a nice little bit o’ sunshine when it’s a cloudy day like today …
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
10:07 am
Jackie
Wow. So you only want to discuss the issues that you want to discuss. Maybe you could win the argument where you make all the rules.
You brought up bank robberies, not me. That wasn’t what we were talking about. But I was glad to discuss that with you. But apparently, you are getting angry because I do want to keep bringing it back to the children.
Good luck to you. Maybe you can find someone who will just agree with you.
I need to go to work.
JAMES
September 30th, 2009
10:08 am
Please fix the laws. If a minor has sex with another minor who was a willing participant then there should not be a legal penalty.
Gary Puckett
September 30th, 2009
10:08 am
Young Girl, get out of my mind,
my love for you is way out of line.
Better run, girl, you’re much too young, girl.
With all the charms of a woman,
You’ve kept the secret of your youth.
You led me to believe you’re old enough to give me love
and now it hurts to know the truth. Oh, Oh,
Young Girl, get out of my mind,
my love for you is way out of line.
Better run, girl, you’re much too young, girl.
Beneath your perfume and make-up,
You’re just a baby in disquise
And though you know that it’s wrong to be alone with me,
that come on look is in your eyes. Oh, Oh,
Young Girl, get out of my mind,
my love for you is way out of line.
Better run, girl, you’re much too young, girl.
So hurry home to your mama
I’m sure she wonders where you are.
Get out of here before I have the time to change my mind
’cause I’m afraid we’ll go too far
Young Girl, get out of my mind,
my love for you is way out of line.
Better run, girl, you’re much too young, girl.
Young Girl, get out of my mind,
my love for you is way out of line.
Better run, girl, you’re much too young, girl.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
10:08 am
The Huffington Post is second only to the Daily Show for accurate unbiased news.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
10:09 am
Wow. I had forgotten exactly how bad Kiss lyrics are.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
10:10 am
lem, HuffPo is an excellent source of fiber for the liberal diet. Highly recommended.
Finn McCool
September 30th, 2009
10:11 am
And Lem, that HuffPo link was from the NY Post.
The conservative Ny Post.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
10:14 am
USinUK
Changing your story, yet again. LOL!!!
SO we agree that children need to be protected. See? Wasn’t that easy?
Conservatives would like for everyone to be happy. Liberals want to be unhappy and try constantly to make others unhappy. If you guys would have looked at who you were voting for instead of considering what would pi*s off conservatives, we wouldn’t be in the mess we are in.
Have a good, cloudy, smelly, dank, London day. (The buildings over there actually smell like mold. How can you stand it?)
Soothsayer
September 30th, 2009
10:17 am
Another War in the Works
America Is Led and Informed by Liars
This is another great article by Paul Craig Roberts and is well worth reading.
Nothing is Free
September 30th, 2009
10:17 am
The Obvious Problem
“The Huffington Post is second only to the Daily Show for accurate unbiased news.”
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:18 am
NiF –
“Changing your story, yet again. LOL!!!”
awwww … diddums … so desperate to be right that you’re lying …
I haven’t changed my story at all. Usually, I’d say “nice try”, but, really, that just smacks of desperation.
“Conservatives would like for everyone to be happy. Liberals want to be unhappy and try constantly to make others unhappy”
wow. that’s so delusional, I don’t even know where to start (of course, the funny thing is that liberals are usually accused of chasing pleasure over responsibility, so I find your accusation rather amusing, actually)
“(The buildings over there actually smell like mold. How can you stand it?)”
well, considering I don’t live or work in a building with damp, it’s not a problem.
Jack
September 30th, 2009
10:19 am
It’s really very easy to stay out of jail. And when one manages that, they don’t have worry about where they’re going to live.
Citizen
September 30th, 2009
10:19 am
NIF:
Only far lefties seem to think that another solution is needed.
No I am about as far right as you get on most issues and another solution is needed
anonymous coward
September 30th, 2009
10:20 am
Jay, thanks for the column today in the AJC. I wasn’t going to post on the comments here since people that seem to hang out there make me physically ill, with a lot of real anger and simple thinking in absolute terms. I’d be very interested to understand what drives the fear underlying the anger those people express here and all over the country, but to be honest I have my own demons to wrestle with.
As far as the sex offenders story and your column – obviously this is a complex problem that deserves more than the simple minded laws that have been enacted. As a nation we don’t do well with finding ways to help people overcome these issues – from drug rehabilitation to sexual rehabilitation. Since we lack the compassion to treat the root of the issues (I mean after all – you have to *earn* health care, right?) we prefer to put them in jails, and when the jails are full and we can’t build any more, we shun them because we can’t bring ourselves to either deal with the real problem or just kill them. Instead we inflict upon them a form of torture, rationalizing it with simple sayings like, “Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time”. (They’ve done their time – so then what?). These are the really hard to solve problems of our time and few among us have the fortitude or capabilities to address them. Do I have a solution to offer? Only humility, compassion and understanding for those that cannot help themselves. And for those that can help themselves and won’t? Then I have a much harder response – remove them.
PM
September 30th, 2009
10:26 am
Enter your comments here
eolufemi
September 30th, 2009
10:26 am
This is a silly law with any number of unintended consequences that are dangerous for the public. Tent cities are a public health hazard. You inevitably get human waste that inevitably contaminates local water supplies. The residents become a vector for communicable diseases. The diseases fester in that population until they eventually make the jump into the main population and suddenly you have a real problem. There’s a reason why the third world still struggles with cholera outbreaks. Don’t let ego push us down a path to destruction merely because we want to appear tough on crime. Policy-makers have to be held to a higher standard. They can’t just say they are doing something to be tough on crime. We should expect them to carefully weigh the pros and cons of any decision. They should have to offer proof that what they are proposing will work with minimal damage to the rest of us. We can’t just make unrealistic principle arguments that lead to this type of nonsense.
jt
September 30th, 2009
10:27 am
do these people have health insurance?
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
10:29 am
jt,
They do if they go back to jail!
jt
September 30th, 2009
10:30 am
If these people do have health insurance, they are paying inflated rates because of mammogram mandates.
So much for case by case consideration.
Bud Wiser
September 30th, 2009
10:31 am
Why bother?
American ‘justice’ allows murderers to go free, or at best serve minimal sentences, when they get drunk or high and kill innocents. The alcohol, the weed, the ice or the blow was responsible for the murderous accident, not the poor, disadvantaged, addicted victim.
Until ‘justice’ swings toward the rights of the victims as opposed to the perps, I could give a rats a$$ what happens to these poor, misguided sex offenders; they should be behind bars anyway, where it is reported that hard core prisoners don’t really care for child molesters and the like, and real justice comes from the savagers, as opposed to the soft headed lawyers and judges.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
10:31 am
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
10:29 am
jt,
They do if they go back to jail!
So, the end result for jailing someone for not paying their healthcare bill is, well, free healthcare at taxpayer’s expense plus the cost of putting the person in jail to begin with. Wow! We sure are smart. Just try and find someone else that can top THAT! hehehe
PM
September 30th, 2009
10:32 am
oh, anonymous person — hate your high and mighty attitude. So, while you address with compassion these problems, what about the island idea? I’m not seeing your tangible resolution here, Mr. Anonymous; just a superior attitude. And, Mr. anonymous, despite my island idea, and despite these people’s “problem”, actually I do have compassion for these people….
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:34 am
“they are paying inflated rates because of mammogram mandates”
tell you what, jt – you pay for my b00bs and I’ll pay for your balls …
deal?
KUHF
September 30th, 2009
10:36 am
BUT IT WASN’T RAPE- RAPE, RIGHT
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
10:36 am
PM,
The island idea was tried. It was called Alcatraz. One glaring problem with it was an insufficient number of sharks.
jt
September 30th, 2009
10:40 am
USinUK-
You don’t have the money to make me ask my wife for my balls back.
You can always fantasize.
Tax Payer funded option, NEVER
September 30th, 2009
10:40 am
First, there is a difference between a “sex offender” that has sex with a 8-10 year old and one that has sex with a 15 year old. I have seen plenty of 15 year olds that don’t look it.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
10:41 am
UsinUK
we discussed pink and blue healthcare a few days ago…..
women live longer and are generally healthier…..men should pay more!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:41 am
jt –
“You don’t have the money to make me ask my wife for my balls back.”
HA! thanks for that … you made me snort
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:42 am
Mrs G –
“we discussed pink and blue healthcare a few days ago”
that’s me … always late to the party …
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
10:42 am
see where Newsmax piece on military coup had to be taken down….
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
10:43 am
And, Viagra should not be covered by health insurance. You bunch of wimps.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
10:43 am
Just a thought, kind of off-topic, but relevant:
If we believe in rehabilitation, should Michael Vick be forgiven as well?
TC6483
September 30th, 2009
10:45 am
I agree that all sex offenders are not the same. All are not sex offenders. I was very young once and wanted to have sex, so I lied about my age. And,, yes, I looked older. Then why don’t we take the 14 year olds, that lie about their age, and put them in some kind of category, that would make their life as unpleasant, as it makes the life of the “so called sexoffender”? I am not blogging about some sick person, that likes girls when their 9 or 10. They can never be helped, and need to be watched. I am blogging about someone maybe 19, with a girl about 14, lying about her age. What about our soldiers in Europe, where the girls can be in clubs at age 16, are they child molesters also?????? I think this law is not fair, because it does not distinquish between the severity of the crimes.
Ray Pugh
September 30th, 2009
10:51 am
Less than 30% of those on the Sex Offender registry are child molesters, fools.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
10:52 am
Bosch-Forgive M.Vick? Yes. Forget?No
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
10:53 am
I don’t think anybody anticipated that a guy posting under the handle of “Tax Payer funded option, NEVER” might contribute
I have seen plenty of 15 year olds that don’t look it.
to this discussion.
Bean-o
September 30th, 2009
10:54 am
( @ )( @ )
Doggone/GA
September 30th, 2009
10:54 am
“If we believe in rehabilitation, should Michael Vick be forgiven as well?”
Certainly…but I wouldn’t sell him a dog.
Morris
September 30th, 2009
10:55 am
For anybody out there that’s married to someone with a two year age difference. At one time you were a sex offender.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
10:55 am
Hef –
10:52 –
well said!
jt
September 30th, 2009
10:55 am
Eventhough, I have nothing against paying for boobs.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
10:56 am
Ray-There should not be a registry for TRUE child molesters only prison ID numbers.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
10:57 am
Eventhough, I have nothing against paying for boobs.
Indeed, every year I file my taxes, I check the Presidential election campaign checkoff.
nita
September 30th, 2009
10:59 am
the law is stupid. georgia has the worlds dumbest govenor and legislators.
Doggone/GA
September 30th, 2009
10:59 am
“For anybody out there that’s married to someone with a two year age difference. At one time you were a sex offender.”
I don’t think so.
RollerGirl
September 30th, 2009
11:00 am
Well this just sucks..for once and hopefully the last time, I agree with Cynthia Tucker..I feel so dirty..it won’t come off..it won’t come off!
Normal
September 30th, 2009
11:01 am
If a person has sex with a child that has not reached puberty, then that person should have his wanger nailed to the kitchen table. The throw a knife on the table and set the house on fire. Let him decide…But if kids who have reached puberty, are naturally curious, and have sex, well, that is no crime. Parents should prepare for that, because it will happen, with birth control. It’s the “Churches” that put an onus on a natural biological function. The “just say no” crowd, who try to lay guilt trips on wonderful, natural acts, and would put otherwise innocent boys and girls in an unfair live ending situation, is beyond contempt.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:02 am
dB –
10:57
YAY!!!
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
11:03 am
The Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday night approved an amendment providing tens of millions of dollars to fund abstinence education programs for teens.
sheeesh
Normal
September 30th, 2009
11:04 am
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
10:57 am
More monitor cleaner, please!
Paul
September 30th, 2009
11:06 am
And the first politician who sponsors legislation to change this will be subjected to all sorts of hysterical ads at reelection. Which is why it won’t happen. Maybe thru the courts, but one would expect if that was the case, some group would have already tried.
Interesting how when people oppose something (health care reform) they want data after data to show, if not prove, what the steps are in the process and that they will lead to the desired outcome. But on an issue like this, emotion and sound bites suffice. Data to demonstrate the current system protects society? Likely nonexistent.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:08 am
“Well this just sucks..for once and hopefully the last time, I agree with Cynthia Tucker..I feel so dirty..it won’t come off..it won’t come off!”
well, thank His Noodley Appendages you posted that here … on Jay’s page … and not on Cynthia’s
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
11:10 am
Anything that can get you a hallelujah doesn’t require proof.
Rob
September 30th, 2009
11:10 am
You all are a bunch of ho’z… The legislation that wrote the Ga sex offender law KNEW exactly what they were doing. They don’t care about categorization. They KNEW that when a 17 year old has sex with his/her 15 year old classmate it would still be a violation of the law. Their moniker… Get as many in the prison system as possible. Keeps us in business
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
11:11 am
And the first politician who sponsors legislation to change this will be subjected to all sorts of hysterical ads at reelection. Which is why it won’t happen. Maybe thru the courts, but one would expect if that was the case, some group would have already tried.
Eventually we will see the folly of our ways, Paul, but I don’t see it happening anytime soon.
And yeah, it’ll probably happen through the courts because ten, twenty years from now, still, our elected officials will still be too gutless to risk being called “soft on violent sex offenders” for acknowledging that everyone–everyone!–has rights to due process and that double jeopardy provisions apply to one and all, as well.
Agree too about your bit about emotion running this thing. It was really fueled by local TV news reports that’ve, in turn, fueled truly stupid helicopter-parenting over the past two-or-so decades. But that’s another topic.
Date the Save
September 30th, 2009
11:13 am
Normal
September 30th, 2009
11:01 am
You’re getting there but, the brush strokes are still too broad. What age do you think some of these girls reach puberty? 10,11,12? I don’t have any girls but I tell you what. If I had one that reached puberty at a young age and she let some much older guy talk her into sex, he wouldn’t be around for long. And… she would be wearing a lock on her hoo ha until she was 18!
Don’t take me too seriously.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
11:13 am
MSGodzilla-Did’nt I hear a report right after the one you spoke of in which the SFC also alotted X amount of dollars towards Sex education? Both were continuations of previous amendments.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
11:13 am
the law is stupid. georgia has the worlds dumbest govenor and legislators.
I really wish that were Jay’s lede this morning. But nooo, he’s always gotta show off his fancy book-learnin’.
FinnMcCool
September 30th, 2009
11:15 am
I suppose the sexting teenagers are getting thrown in the woods with the other sex offenders?
I guess everyone is happy in the end? Jeez.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
11:17 am
Well, if it weren’t for sex offenders, we wouldn’t have no illegitimate children or abortions. So, they are the root of all these evils. Can I get a hallelujah.
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
11:18 am
Gandalf, the Wise
September 30th, 2009
11:20 am
Brad Steel! KISS is one of the greatest Rock Band, don’t you appreciate thier tunes? PLEASE!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:20 am
dB, Paul and Finneus –
“Eventually we will see the folly of our ways, Paul, but I don’t see it happening anytime soon” and “I suppose the sexting teenagers are getting thrown in the woods with the other sex offenders?”
what it’s going to take to change the law is another high-profile case like GA had with Genarlow Wilson. it’s going to take parents (acting as a bloc) speaking up on behalf of their kids who have been caught up in this nightmare to change the law. (and, yes, it’s going to take some high-profile lilly-white teenagers to tug the heart-strings)
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
11:21 am
KISS called that stuff Rock. I called it Screeching Clowns.
Date the Save
September 30th, 2009
11:22 am
Come on, KISS has it’s place.
I Report/ Vast White Wing Conspirator (-: You Whine )-:
September 30th, 2009
11:22 am
The Islamic lunatics rape thirteen year old boys during their off duty time of pushing brick walls over onto homosexuals, so yeah, let’s attack the evil State of Georgia that makes perverts sleep under a bridge.
The target that won’t chop your head off.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:23 am
Hehehe – don’t sell Vick a dog.
Finn,
Ya’ know – I think back to my teenage days and lord have mercy if there were cell phones with cameras. Oh, the trouble I would have gotten into – hell, I should be glad I ain’t living in the woods in a van down by the river!!
Hey Paul! I really po-ed someone today – did ya’ hear? Apparently I’m a liar
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
11:23 am
The publicized exploitations of children of some prominent Republican Georgia Legislators might lead to change even quicker than anything else.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:24 am
“Come on, KISS has it’s place.”
yep. in the sale bin at WalMart …
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:25 am
whiner -
you tell ‘em!! because if there are bad things going on in islamic countries, we don’t HAVE to fix anything that’s broken here!!!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:25 am
KISS is awesome.
Tom
September 30th, 2009
11:25 am
Bizarre. The South is heading backwards. Fat, ugly bodies with equally fat, ugly heads. Yup.
Date the Save
September 30th, 2009
11:27 am
USinUK, opinions vary.
FinnMcCool
September 30th, 2009
11:27 am
Tax and USinUK are right.
As soon as some “innocent” rich kid or politician’s kid gets ostracized to the woods this solution will be “inhumane” and “non-christian like.”
I Report/ Vast White Wing Conspirator (-: You Whine )-:
September 30th, 2009
11:28 am
“We brought the global economy back from the brink,” President Obozo said at the close of the G-20 meeting last week. “(B)ecause of the bold and coordinated action that we took, millions of jobs have been saved or created; the decline in output has been stopped; financial markets have come back to life”.
Imagine what this illiterate would say if the economy actually was turning around, instead of miring deeper into the great depression, the libs would be having televised orgies of themselves.
ew
FinnMcCool
September 30th, 2009
11:30 am
I Report is like the snooping nancy in everyone’s neighborhood: Worried about what is going on in everyone else’s yard/house/country while thinking their own home is perfect.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
11:31 am
I grew up in the 60’s & 70’s and I got to admit KISS was’nt that big in my area of the world.They did have a following but small,Led Zep,Bad Co.,Lynrd Skynrd(I know spelled wrong-shoot me),Wings,Stones, Little Feat&Pink Floyd were bands of choice.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:31 am
whiner –
“Imagine what this illiterate would say if the economy actually was turning around, instead of miring deeper into the great depression, the libs would be having televised orgies of themselves.”
recovery??? you’re soaking in it!! since you evidently missed the news earlier:
The worst U.S. recession since the Great Depression eased more than anticipated in the second quarter, setting the stage for a recovery to take hold in the last half of 2009.
The world’s largest economy shrank at a 0.7 percent annual rate from April through June, the best performance in more than a year, revised figures from the Commerce Department showed today in Washington. Gross domestic product contracted at a 6.4 percent pace in the first three months of 2009.
Government stimulus plans such as “cash for clunkers” and first-time homebuyer credits are giving manufacturing and housing, the two areas at the center of the economic slump, a boost this quarter. Federal Reserve policy makers are among those concerned that gains in consumer spending will not be sustained as unemployment climbs and incomes stagnate.
“The economy was certainly bottoming out in the second quarter,” said Michelle Meyer, an economist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York. “Businesses are in better shape to start production. Massive government spending has been supportive of growth and will continue to help.”
-snip-
Purchases are recovering this quarter. Sales at retailers surged in August by the most in three years, boosted by demand for automobiles as Americans rushed to take advantage of the “cash for clunkers” plan, figures from the Commerce Department showed earlier this month.
A smaller decline in business investment on equipment and software than previously estimated also contributed to the improved reading on GDP, the report said. Such spending fell at a 4.9 percent annual pace, compared with the 8.4 percent decline announced last month.
Inventories Plunge
Today’s report showed the record drop in stockpiles in the second quarter was even larger than previously estimated, paving the way for gains in manufacturing in the second half of the year. Automakers General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. are among firms boosting production in coming months.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=a3g5lqDmy2N8
ken
September 30th, 2009
11:31 am
This is probably the only time I have agreed with you.
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
11:34 am
I too was not much of a KISS fan until I actually listened to their albums. Try it and ya just might change ya mind.
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
11:35 am
Why does HealthCare keep skyrocketing? Well here is a portion of the answer…
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/09/22/illegal.immigrants.healthcare/index.html
Send the BUMS back!!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:35 am
Hef,
Wings? OMG, Lynyrd Skynyrd makes my skin crawl and so do the Eagles. But Pink Floyd? Now, your talking.
FinnMcCool
September 30th, 2009
11:35 am
I bet if we went back to public stoning we would have a lot less crime.
Maybe we could bring back some of the old European torture devices too?
There’s one where they put you in a wooden cask with only your head sticking out and they haul you around town stopping to allow people to empty their bedpans into the cask with you. Your flesh starts rotting off after a week or so.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:37 am
Finn,
That is very disturbing.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
11:38 am
Turd-I have,they just don’t do it for me.However “Hard Luck Woman” would be my favorite if I had to choose. Garth Brooks cover of same is quite good also.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:39 am
It’s a banner day!!!! I got all five answers on the Find 5 Challenge!!! I rule!!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:39 am
Bosch –
hey … don’t go dissing on Wings … I love Band on the Run and Live and Let Die … Floyd is brilliant … as is Little Feat … someone forgot to include Allman Bros on the list …
Doggone/GA
September 30th, 2009
11:39 am
“I bet if we went back to public stoning we would have a lot less crime.”
Didn’t seem to work very well in Biblical days, did it?
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:40 am
Bosch –
11:39 – well done – treat yourself to some cheesy shrimpy grits …
FinnMcCool
September 30th, 2009
11:40 am
USinUK, if your economic news isn’t from the Heritage Foundation, you might as well throw it away!
Republicans know where the truth can be found!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:40 am
“Didn’t seem to work very well in Biblical days, did it?”
oh, you mean THAT kind of stoned …
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:41 am
Okay, okay, okay, okay, okay, okay –
You know you did it, but now it’s officially banned – I wonder if the offenders will be required to register as sex offenders:
Boston-area college bans sex with roommate around
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/boston-area-college-bans-149990.html?cxntlid=thbz_hm&imw=Y
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:42 am
Finn –
hahaha … true that … call me one of those people in the reality-based community
md
September 30th, 2009
11:42 am
Funny how the state worries about sex offenders, but murederers can live anywhere. Go figure.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:43 am
USinUK,
I think I will!!!
Snort. Public stoning – I was publically stoned alot back in the day!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:44 am
Oh, and USinUK,
I didn’t know who Wings was – but now I do – Sir Paul’s post-Beatles gig.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:44 am
Bosch –
“Boston-area college bans sex with roommate around”
that reminds me of one of my favorite calls to Dr. Drew – “my college roommate thinks I’m asleep and she starts … taking care of personal business. how do I let her know I’m not asleep??” Dr. Drew’s answer was that she should clear her throat, but it made me wonder how Miss Manners would have handled the question …
OfCourse
September 30th, 2009
11:45 am
Georgia lawmakers have no common sense. If you are tired of your tax dollars paying for teenage girlfriend/boyfriend offenders being punished for the rest of their lives just like the real predators, sit back and do nothing. If you are sick of these laws, which are STUPID and eating up your tax dollars paying the judicial system and prisons, take a stand and push these lawmakers to make some changes. You may not think this effects your family, but mark my word, chances are someone you know down the line will be caught up in some of Georgia’s crazy archaic laws.
starbuck
September 30th, 2009
11:45 am
With winter coming and the possibility of one of these people freezing to death out in the woods, whose supposed to pay for the burial? Taxpayers, next of kin, sex offender burial fund?
I Report/ Vast White Wing Conspirator (-: You Whine )-:
September 30th, 2009
11:46 am
U StinK- Perhaps you should read your own cut and paste-
Federal Reserve policy makers are among those concerned that gains in consumer spending will not be sustained as unemployment climbs and incomes stagnate.
What your article says, distilled down to the nutshell and sans the left wing media propaganda speak, is that as long as the government still has money to spend, everything might be ok.
You should Google “China, diversification” for a long term forecast on that^^ nonsense.
Matilda
September 30th, 2009
11:47 am
KISS – from the third row, back in the days when you could um….. relax and enjoy concerts. Yeah, baby!
Kamchak
September 30th, 2009
11:47 am
Bosch
It seems you have more than one stalker.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
11:48 am
Bosch-How could I forget my Eagles,yes still am a big fan,sorry. They harmonize so well,they’re live albums are great. I also forgot The Who,Animals, The Kinks & th Guess Who to name a few. I went to a Ted Nugent concert many years ago,he was good.The opening band was fantastic Van Halen,they were new to the scene, man could they rock!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:48 am
USinUK,
Clear her throat? Double snort.
Paul
September 30th, 2009
11:49 am
Bosch
[[Hey Paul! I really po-ed someone today – did ya’ hear? Apparently I’m a liar]]
Yeah, I saw that exchange. It’s kinda normal for some people, though, when they get all frustrated and get their egos wrapped up in their opinions to resort to the adult blogger’s equivalent of a child’s “you doodoo head!”
But keep it in perspective. People like that, well, I’d wager they don’t even like Battlestar Galactica, so how much should you let their aspersions get to you?
On another topic, Democrats (and some Republicans, but it’s Democrats who are running the show) tied into the military industrial complex are at it again. Pentagon has a type of funds called Operations and Maintenance. Used for daily operations, training, supplies, that kind of stuff. Seems Congress wants to cut about 4 BILLION from what the President wants for O&M and use it to force the Air Force to buy more cargo planes it doesn’t need and for pet projects by influential (guess which party has the influence?) lawmakers.
Sen McCain’s leading a valiant effort to shut it down but he’ll likely go down in flames.
The Pres isn’t threatening a veto over this. I wish he would.
William
September 30th, 2009
11:50 am
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:44 am
Bosch –
“Boston-area college bans sex with roommate around”
I took college online and my wife still had that rule!!
FinnMcCool
September 30th, 2009
11:51 am
good point, md.
Maybe we could put the sex offenders on an island with bankers who caused the economic mess? Throw in some murderers too.
Reality TV, anyone? I’ll bring the popcorn!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:51 am
whiner –
“What your article says, distilled down to the nutshell and sans the left wing media propaganda speak, is that as long as the government still has money to spend, everything might be ok.”
awwwww … grasping at straws is just so CUTE when you do it, whiner!
we’re in a U-shaped recovery, but a recovery we are definitely in — too bad that you’re so partisan you’re cheering for the country to fail rather than for the Fed’s and Obama’s policies to succeed.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:52 am
Kamchak,
Oh no! I might need to beef up my security detail. It’s always a good day when you rile the wingnuts – and today, hell, I didn’t even have to do anything but show up!
Hef,
U2, and the Clash – Joshua Tree and London Calling. Enough said.
Hey, word on the street is that your fiance is hot!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:54 am
WBH – keepin’ it classy, as usual
(I could have sworn that you said you were leaving and never coming back … and yet, here you are)
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
11:55 am
Bosch –
“U2, and the Clash – Joshua Tree and London Calling. Enough said”
TESTIFY!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:55 am
Paul,
“People like that, well, I’d wager they don’t even like Battlestar Galactica”
I know man, some people just don’t get it like we do, huh?
William,
Wow, that sucks for you man – sorry.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
11:58 am
Paul,
We’ve been abloggin’ here for quite a long time now – don’t you think a two day tirade is a record? I rule!!
USinUK,
Testify indeed!!! That gets me every time.
Kamchak
September 30th, 2009
12:00 pm
(I could have sworn that you said you were leaving and never coming back … and yet, here you are)
Reminds me of another drama queen. I think it’s all about the indignant departure–then they miss the fainting couch.
Say What??
September 30th, 2009
12:01 pm
It’s Bush’s fault. Either him or Cheney. There, I beat you to it.
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
12:01 pm
Kam –
“I think it’s all about the indignant departure–then they miss the fainting couch.”
Wyld Bill (leaving in a) Huff
(now we know … he’s actually a 14-year old girl)
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
12:02 pm
Say What??
My bet is it’s Cheney’s fault – because, you know, he’s evil and all that.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
12:07 pm
Oh no! I might need to beef up my security detail.
@@ be packin’ empty juice boxes and Chips Ahoy wrappers.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
12:08 pm
I don’t know how we got from KISS to the Clash, but I’m pretty sure it violates some Mosaic law, mentioning them in the same comments thread.
jt
September 30th, 2009
12:09 pm
The KISS army back in the day, turned into the lib-tards of today.
I knew it then and I know it now, Real rock stars and real men have no business wearing make-up.
(although I did see them in 79). Buncha pansies.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:10 pm
Didn’t seem to work very well in Biblical days, did it?
I wasn’t there so I don’t know. Perhaps we should all get stoned and find out.
md
September 30th, 2009
12:10 pm
“we’re in a U-shaped recovery, but a recovery we are definitely in — too bad that you’re so partisan you’re cheering for the country to fail rather than for the Fed’s and Obama’s policies to succeed.”
I wouldn’t count the chickens too early. I’ve read many an economist that are predicting a W-shaped recovery, meaning a double bottom, and with the current un-expected drop in consumer confidence, the upcoming holiday season should give us a good indicator. I’m not seeing it around me, as more and more small businesses continue to close as they have hung on as long as they could and no help in sight. Unemployment still rising, many have given up all together, and foreclosures backlogged in the system. The housing maket must clear inventory, and with the foreclosures looming, look for standing inventory to increase.
With that in mind, I tend to think the W is more likely than the U.
Paul
September 30th, 2009
12:10 pm
Bosch
[[don’t you think a two day tirade is a record? I rule!!]]
We’ve seen some bloggers who’ve since departed whose every post was a tirade. But I see your point, and yup, for an on topic and consistent tirade, eloquently delivered, you do indeed rule.
‘Course, that’s kinda like saying you have the biggest ball of navel lint, but hey…..
Cheney is evil? Really? Does it extend to all things as a pervasive characteristic, or is it restricted to certain facets of a political nature? Is redemption possible? And anyhow, isn’t evil necessary so we can know how to recognize the good?
Unlike Rangel. Didja know he’s a complete crook, hasn’t shown the least amount of remorse, AND…. Speaker Pelosi encourages his crookedness… which is not a characteristic of goodness… so…. she’s a partner with Cheney!!! HA!
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
12:11 pm
Jay –
okay, there is REALLY nothing wrong with my 12:09 or 12:10 … please release me … let me goooooo …
USinUK
September 30th, 2009
12:13 pm
md –
it’s not going to be a pretty recovery (especially as the banks are still keeping the purse strings very tight) … however, even the investment call I was just on this afternoon says a U-shaped recovery – just not a steep one …
Turd Ferguson
September 30th, 2009
12:15 pm
Hey Finn…here are some more favorites…
The Brazen Bull
The Pear of Anquish
The Iron Maiden
The Judas Cradle
The Crocodile Tube
The Brank
Which are your favorites?
a
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:17 pm
A “W” shaped recovery! Who says irony is not alive and kicking. You just gotta know which Bush to look behind.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
12:18 pm
The KISS army back in the day, turned into the lib-tards of today.
I knew it then and I know it now, Real rock stars and real men have no business wearing make-up.
(although I did see them in 79). Buncha pansies.
See, that’s where I take what might be respectful issue on a fairly serious issue.
My beef with KISS is that it seemed a hopelessly reactionary outfit. They hopped aboard something that was already so over it wasn’t funny–crunch-guitar glam rock, out of T.Rex and Bowie’s Ziggy phase–and stripped it of any kind of liberating social context it might’ve had. While they might’ve had a few punk fans back in the day, if I remember right, mostly they were beloved by the dopier hard-rock/metal guys, the sort of louts who had just figured out in ‘79 that “DISCO SUCKS!”
That said, I don’t think I’ve ever heard more than a few actual tracks of theirs in their entirety, so maybe as Turd claimed there was something there in the albums. (and the solo spinoff tune “New York Groove” is actually a pretty good song). But I stand by my assertion that KISS sucked because they were fundamentally conservative.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:21 pm
Limbaugh, Huckabee, Thompson and Gingrich were the original members of KISS.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
12:21 pm
Bosch@11:52-I don’t like to brag well yes I do when I can,No she’s EXTREMELY BEAUTIFULL!!!(yes I know to many LL’s,they stand for her gorgeous legs). I’m lucky to have her,and funny enough she thinks it’s the other way around,yes lucky indeed.
Vanessa
September 30th, 2009
12:22 pm
Anyone who derides the concerns expressed by Jay and others as defending sex offenders is missing the point. It’s not about their “rights.” The real problem is that Georgia’s system allows the truly dangerous, vicious predators to avoid the law enforcement attention and social stigma they deserve by mixing in with the much larger herd of lesser offenders and non predators. By applying justice with more intelligent and discriminating intent instead of with punitive mass hysteria, the citizens of Georgia could help the justice system and society focus on those criminals who SHOULD face ongoing scrutiny, punishment and separation from the community. The way the laws are now, we can’t even tell who the really scary predators are…
JJ
September 30th, 2009
12:22 pm
Castrate all child molesters, rapists and register them after thier prison time. Any statutory cases should be dealt with through courts and common sense. Simple as that.
Public Option's Doing Swell
September 30th, 2009
12:23 pm
As has been pointed out countless times, the morons in the JawJaw legislature are afraid to make granular laws that would not lable two kids within 2 or 3 years of each other as well as the age of consent “sex offenders.” Or to satisfy their sense of hypocritical self-righteousness where they make laws in one hour and go see their hooker-mistress the next, they could make consensual sex a misdemeanor not subject to any of the sex-offender lables and laws.
These tent cities have sprung up all over the country, under viaducts with no sewage or electricity and are a testamant to stupidity.
Naturally, these are laws written by Repubozos, and typical.
Tonia
September 30th, 2009
12:23 pm
Our current sex offender registry laws are doing nothing to protect our children. In fact, in a lot of cases, it is our children ending up on the registries, some for life. There are too many non-violent crimes that are landing people on the registries, with restrictions that are not only unreasonable but unconstitutional. How is someone supposed to have any type of a future with this label? What about the teenagers on the list for consensual sex? I dont think a 19 year old who has consensual sex with his 16 year old girlfriend should be considered a sex offender. What about the dumb teens posting nude pictures of themselves on MySpace? Do you think these teenagers and young adults should be categorized as child molesters? Well, they are. Our laws need reform and they need it now – before we are all sex offenders.
http://www.love-is-not-a-crime.com
Public Option's Doing Swell
September 30th, 2009
12:24 pm
As has been pointed out countless times, the morons in the JawJaw legislature are afraid to make granular laws that would not lable two kids within 2 or 3 years of each other as well as the age of consent “sex offenders.” Or to satisfy their sense of hypocritical self-righteousness where they make laws in one hour and go see their hooker-mistress the next, they could make consensual sex a misdemeanor not subject to any of the sex-offender lables and laws.
These tent cities have sprung up all over the country, under viaducts with no sewage or electricity and are a testamant to stupidity.
Naturally, these are laws written by Repubozos, and typical.
.
KUHF
September 30th, 2009
12:25 pm
morris is an idiot
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
12:26 pm
Limbaugh, Huckabee, Thompson and Gingrich were the original members of KISS.
Also, John Ensign penned “I was made for lovin’ you.”
md
September 30th, 2009
12:26 pm
“it’s not going to be a pretty recovery (especially as the banks are still keeping the purse strings very tight) … however, even the investment call I was just on this afternoon says a U-shaped recovery – just not a steep one …”
I’m not too sure the investors are looking at the entire painting. Even as job loss slows and consumer confidence picks up, people’s spending philosophy has changed. Those that have it are thinking twice before using it, and those that don’t have it can not get the credit they once did. All that points to decreased spending in a consumer driven economy. And as you said, they banks are hoarding what they have in fear of going under. I also see commercial real estate about to blow up as they too have held on about as long as they could, but with each closing business, they can no longer make their payments. “For lease” signs don’t exactly pay the rent.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
12:26 pm
Bosch-How bouts some Moody Blues & early Santana? Wow I feel old!!
Public Option's Doing Swell
September 30th, 2009
12:27 pm
Speaking of typical Repubozos, what your Repubozo insurance hookers are teeing up in Senate Finance that will be trashed on the floor is to raise insurance prices dramatically, make them compulsory, and the penalty is one year in federal prison with 25 grand fine.
Welcome to Repubozo Insurance World. Of the insurance companies, by the insurance companies for which the insurance companies stand.
@@
September 30th, 2009
12:28 pm
Well, jay, I’m just not feelin’ their pain.
Let ‘em pool their resources and get a half-way house on the outskirts of town.
When it comes to teenage girls (12 years old?) having sex, we need to ask ourselves why girls so young feel the need to subjugate themselves. Before we know it, 10 year old girls will be seen as consenting.
Promoting misogyny? It’s a good thing according to some of your leftist friends here.
After having read some of the more graphic contributions, I’d be willing to bet there are a few child molesters on this site who are looking to change the law for personal gain.
Kamchak:
I see that I occupy that empty space between your ears.
Bosch
It seems you have more than one stalker.
I was simply pointing out Bosch’s hypocrisy.
Paul:
Yeah, I saw that exchange. It’s kinda normal for some people, though, when they get all frustrated and get their egos wrapped up in their opinions to resort to the adult blogger’s equivalent of a child’s “you doodoo head!”
But keep it in perspective. People like that, well, I’d wager they don’t even like Battlestar Galactica, so how much should you let their aspersions get to you?
I didn’t call Bosch a “doodoo head”, I said he was a subterranean annoyance.
Bosch gets away with too much by covering up his own attacks with his cutesy act and his commonplace banter…his playing dumb routine. Insulting people and covering it up with a smiley don’t cut it with me. He’s subversive…ergo my use of the word subterranean.
I Report/ Vast White Wing Conspirator :-) You Whine :-(
September 30th, 2009
12:31 pm
On the manufacturing front, however, the Institute for Supply Management-Chicago said its business barometer fell to 46.1 in September from 50.0 in August, with a reading above 50 indicating expansion. Economists had expected a rise to 52.0.-Reuters
Uh, yeah.
Doggone/GA
September 30th, 2009
12:31 pm
“Castrate”
Contrary to popular belief…castration does NOT end a man’s ability to have sex. And rape is not primarily a sex offense, it is primarily a violent act. It’s about power, not sex.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
12:32 pm
Date the Save
September 30th, 2009
11:13 am
Late getting back in…sorry. I have three daughters and they all had sex in high school. My wife and I discussed this when the oldest started her transformation and we decided to take matters into our own hands. We insisted that they drink their orange juice every morning 28 days in a row, every month, of every year they were under our roof. It may have been underhanded, but we slept nights.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:38 pm
Wow, Bosch. I never realized just what kind of blogger you are until @@ informed us all. How do we even tolerate you, setting such a bad example and such. No wonder mike and Andy but likely just moi yam what I yam.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
12:40 pm
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:10 pm
Huh? Stoned? DAVE’S NOT HERE!!!
Hef
September 30th, 2009
12:41 pm
Normal-My soon wife to be & I have decided to purchase a chastity belt for our 12 year old,our own form of sex education.
stands for decibels
September 30th, 2009
12:42 pm
Wow, Bosch. I never realized just what kind of blogger you are until @@ informed us all.
Y’all’re such a misogynist-promoters!
(That must’ve been the “juice box” crack.)
@@
September 30th, 2009
12:42 pm
Taxpayer:
If you’ll take notice, many of the conservatives here enjoy engaging Bosch.
I’m just not one of ‘em.
To me he’s a waste of dexterity.
I simply don’t find him as entertaining as he finds himself.
md
September 30th, 2009
12:43 pm
And don’t tempt teens by buying them cell phones with cameras. Stupid moments are increased when parents also have stupid moments.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
12:44 pm
paul: Cheney is evil? Really? Does it extend to all things as a pervasive characteristic, or is it restricted to certain facets of a political nature? Is redemption possible? And anyhow, isn’t evil necessary so we can know how to recognize the good?
Yes to all, but like any good Talibabtist, right before he dies, he can ask G-D for forgiveness and be saved.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
12:45 pm
@@-I for one am trying to cross the isle to do the people’s work.
Rightwing Troll
September 30th, 2009
12:46 pm
“The law hounding those people has no real purpose but to, well, hound them. As experts have testified to the Georgia Legislature, it serves little or no protective function. A sexual predator intent on finding victims will do so, regardless of where he (or occasionally she) is forced to live.”
You talking about gun control or sex offenders???
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
12:46 pm
Bosch
you get away with soooo much just ‘cuz you’re cute!
were you the GOP VP nominee last year?
@@
September 30th, 2009
12:47 pm
Hef:
Been there, done that.
Believe me….there’s no pay off in the end.
More power to you though.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:50 pm
Bosch gets away with so much for many reasons. First, it is his like of select Battle’s stars. Second, he like eggs. I mean, really, do I even need to go on.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:51 pm
@@
September 30th, 2009
12:47 pm
Hef:
Been there, done that.
Believe me….there’s no pay off in the end.
More power to you though.
I’ve done many things that had no outwardly obvious ‘payoff’ but I would not undo a single one of them to this day.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
12:55 pm
Taxpayer
“I’ve done many things that had no outwardly obvious ‘payoff’ but I would not undo a single one of them to this day.”
Me, too. Everyday and proud of it.
It isn’t always about payoff, and quite cynical to think otherwise.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
12:55 pm
However, I am being negligent. I have not apologized for voting for Bush, the destroyer, in some time now. So, I apologize. Further, I apologize in advance for the predicted “W” recovery.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
12:56 pm
Paul,
Yes, Cheney can be redeemed, just like GWB in my book – he can shut the hell up and crawl back from whinst he came!!!
TWO blogger two day tirades – I soooo rule!!!! That’s better than FIRST!!
(Although @@’s tirade against me has lasted a couple years).
Hef,
Yeah, I like the Moody Blues and Santana – alot. Thinking of them reminds me of a funny SNL skit where they do a spoof on Blue Oyster Cult and Will Ferrell plays the cowbells. I’ll try to find a video.
Taxpayer,
Wow, I guess I didn’t know what kind of blogger I was either!
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
12:58 pm
Mrs. G.,
Can I borrow Joe for my security detail?
Hef
September 30th, 2009
1:00 pm
@@-With age my High Horse has been reduced to a Shetland Pony. Thanks for the advise though.
@@
September 30th, 2009
1:01 pm
Taxpayer:
I too have contributed much with no expectations of anything in return. All have served to help people I know and even people I don’t know.
What I’m talking about are civil exchanges rewarded with insults.
I guess I WAS what Andy calls a “squish”.
I learned the hard way and I can’t thank you libs enough.
Normal
September 30th, 2009
1:03 pm
Hef: If you really want to help your kid, let me offer a possible solution. But I warn you to use it will take self control and constantly telling yourself it the right thing to do. When my children, the older ones were almost teens, I started a family method of solving problems by instituting “Truce and Truth”. The program was only for the kids and could not be used by the parents, but it gave the kids a way to break the ice without fear of reprisal if they had a problem they needed to work out. It went like this. One would come in and say, Dad, I need to declare Truce and Truth. At that time, the TV went off, and the child, my wife and I would retire to my office, or go to the kitchen table if the child said the family could hear. The main thing is that since the Truce was called, nothing the child said could be punished. The purpose of this exercise was not to punish but to find solutions to problems that were upsetting them. I will tell you again that no matter what you heard, you had to take it. Many times I wanted to spin up and throttle the kid, but you have to keep your cool because they have to trust you enough to keep coming back with more problems. It was the best way I could think of to keep an open line of communication with my kids. Did it work? Overall yes. But there were times when I wished it hadn’t…but I have good kids and they use the same method with theirs. Try it if you dare, but never, ever, renege because it will distroy any trust they ever had in you.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
1:09 pm
Bosch
Why of course!
(Disclaimer: if the bad guys OR gals after you have a porkchop in their pocket, best kiss your butt goodbye. Joe is a pork chop partisan)
@@
September 30th, 2009
1:10 pm
(Although @@’s tirade against me has lasted a couple years).
Totally not true, Bosch.
I can recall having quite a few pleasant exchanges with you up to and until your subversive behavior became apparent.
You wanna deliver your hits but won’t stand still when people hit back.
I remember a little tirade of yours whereby when pushed, you came back playing your victim card saying I was THE MOST DANGEROUS blogger here because I misled people into thinking I was a nice person.
Give me a break!!! You a victim!!?!!
Find the sympathy you demand from your ^^^ pool of hyenas (I’m not talkin’ about Hef).
@@
September 30th, 2009
1:11 pm
Just in case you’re lurkin, I’m outta here, jay.
No need to worry your little head, none.
Hef
September 30th, 2009
1:15 pm
Normal-Thanks,I’ll keep that in mind. Have you or anyone you know ever attempted the locked in basement till they’re 21 approach? Neighbors did it with their 2 kids with amazing results,so quite and reserved. Seriously I’ll keep what you say in mind.
Bosch
September 30th, 2009
1:15 pm
When pushed. LOL!!! Good lord, some people take themselves WAY too seriously.
md
September 30th, 2009
1:19 pm
Normal,
Truce and truth – glad it worked for you, but I could see that one abused easily for a more caniving child. Actions have consequences, and what is the child learning if they can nullify the consequences by declaring a truce. I’m guessing others not so disciplined could use that as the ultimate out.
I always told ours that actions have consequences and the consequences were always reduced if I heard it from them. If they hid it and we found out, consequences doubled. I’m sure they got away with plenty, but there were many times when they came to us and took their lumps , especially after they suffered the double wammy a few times.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
1:20 pm
Perish the thought!
mike
September 30th, 2009
1:28 pm
@@ –
“I remember a little tirade of yours whereby when pushed, you came back playing your victim card saying I was THE MOST DANGEROUS blogger here because I misled people into thinking I was a nice person.”
Tell me about it. Yesterday he called me a bigot, but refused to say who I was bigoted against or provide a single quote that pointed to such bigotry. Oh yes, then he said that I was “not civil”.
Bodine
September 30th, 2009
1:30 pm
To those of you who insist these Odiotic,Senseless,ILL-Thought Draconian laws are just,What part of Wendy Whitaker,William Hawkins and Genarlow Wilson don’t you understand?Please tell
me also,what does being a Democrat or repukeblican have to do with supporting injustice.And last
but not least,why were there no beautiful young School teachers(who were caught molesting young
boy students),living in this camp.Justice is blind……………………………………………..Yeah,Right.
Public Option's Doing Swell
September 30th, 2009
1:30 pm
Intriguing that the Repubozos on Senate Finance and want to keep any federal funds from abortion when abortion is the law of the land. If they want abortion outlawed, let’s see them get it through Congress.o
Olympia Snowe voted with the Dems. Hatch’s federal funds for abortion prohibition is defeated for the second time. LOL “the conscience protection act.” The Repubozos are trying to protect conscience–what a friggin’ joke.
Let’s see –the Supreme Court has upheld abortions and the Repubozos want to get at the law by endrunning around it in the new health care legislation. It was DUHFEATED.
Public Option's Doing Swell
September 30th, 2009
1:34 pm
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee and Democracy for America have been running hard hitting ads in Montana, Maine, and Washington, DC, targeting Baucus and Snowe for failing to support a public option. With their votes registered, the groups are now seeking to extend the ad buys.
Let’s defeat all Blue Dog Hookers. Let them take their whorehouses out of the Senate perhaps in Malls in their states.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
1:36 pm
elections have consequences so do SFC votes…..
Just Woke Up
September 30th, 2009
1:37 pm
“Kerry For President”, “O”, “Co-Exist”, and “End This War” bumper stickers – now that’s funny!
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
1:52 pm
I tried the lock in room approach on my stepson one time and regretted that one. In no time, he got bored and found some matches and, well, it was only carpet.
Carbon Bigfootprint
September 30th, 2009
1:55 pm
[well hey, if Al Gore and the UN can have one, why not me? I sure don't agree with raising taxes over it]
I find it more than mildly amusing that the same liberals who want to hang a Conservative sex offender are concerned about local sex offenders – and turn a blind eye to that liberal
‘I remember a little tirade of yours whereby when pushed, you came back playing your victim card saying I was THE MOST DANGEROUS blogger here because I misled people into thinking I was a nice person. Give me a break!!! You a victim!!?!!”
Welcome to the world of critical thinking in liberal land, @@. I’m surprised you weren’t called an internal threat to America.
So, how’s it going in Chicago land lately with Obama flying around trying to win an Olympic bid? I’m so sure the MSM would have been so quiet had Bush flown overseas in an attempt to whore out Dallas to the Olympics. Chicago’s intertwined political hacks, many of which were rewarded to the Obama Administration, would probably make the Atlanta Olympics look competent – and that’s saying a lot.
‘CHICAGO (CBS) ― Six people were in custody on Wednesday for criminal damage at an anti-Olympic protest in the Loop Tuesday evening. A group of protesters tried to snatch an Olympic decoration that was supposed to go on the Picasso statue in Daley Plaza. CBS 2’s Anne State reports that the whole thing started as workers were decorating Daley Plaza for the Olympics. An oversized Olympic medal was being taken out of packaging as a group of protesters nearby was beating drums chanting, “No Games.”‘
So, what else is going on out there – lets see here..
Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez, BFF of Hollywood liberals and Jimmy Carter, and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi have joined forces to urge the world to redefine “terrorism”. Isn’t that special.
September economic figures are out: the ADP Employer Services showed private employers cut 254,000 jobs in September, more than the 210,000 layoffs the market had been expecting; manufacturing shrunk. Thank God for that trillion dollar stimulus bill that saved jobs.
Gore Vidal says that America could fall into a military dictatorship under leadership like Obama’s. Well, he’s already appointed czars to handle the jobs of what used to belong to cabinet members. He’s already mentioned a civilian security force is needed. What’s the next step?
every mothers son
September 30th, 2009
1:59 pm
There is a female sex offender who lives about four houses from me. I saw her address on the sex offenders registry.
When is she going to pay me a visit……….?????
Call it Like It Is
September 30th, 2009
2:01 pm
Hey Taxpayer which I doubt you are.
You are a F Moron!
Enough Said!
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
2:01 pm
Carbon bigfoot
Love the nomme du jour!
Date the Save
September 30th, 2009
2:02 pm
Normal
September 30th, 2009
1:03 pm
Wow. I like the sounds of that. What a great idea.
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
2:02 pm
enter “call it like it is”…….
Mrs. Godzilla
September 30th, 2009
2:04 pm
Oh and Carbon bigfoot
your name (names) have been entered into the roll of the civilian security force.
took up 13 pages…..
The Chicago Way
September 30th, 2009
2:13 pm
What’s going on in Chicago?
WTF?
Public Option's Doing Swell
September 30th, 2009
2:13 pm
If anyone needs a hassle free antivirus for a Windows box that costs nothing, MSFT has released Microsft Security Essentials that runs in the background and is very good at picking off spyware or worse.
http://www.microsoft.com/Security_essentials/
Bodine
September 30th, 2009
2:20 pm
I’ll be willing to bet that most of you self-righteous sickO’s,who insist these foolish sex offender
law’s represent justice,have probably done far worse sexually predatory things than some of these
on the list……………..You Know Who You Are………And you know what you have gotten away with.
JR
September 30th, 2009
2:24 pm
Here’s an idea:
Lock up rapists and child molesters. Never let them out. Problem solved.
Yeah, I know, there’s still the “underage fornication” issue. Surely we can find some means of differentiating between teenage sex and rape/molestation. The former shouldn’t be anything beyond a misdemeanor, if that.
Taxpayer
September 30th, 2009
2:33 pm
Call it Like It Is
September 30th, 2009
2:01 pm
Hey Taxpayer which I doubt you are.
You are a F Moron!
Enough Said!
I know, son. I also know not to leave you alone with matches. It’s OK.
Bud Wiser
September 30th, 2009
3:14 pm
Maybe those ‘woods’ in Cobb County won’t stink so badly now that the human garbage is being evicted.
Finfam
September 30th, 2009
3:24 pm
Registry Laws have been proven to be ineffective and a waste of government resources and YET we continue to feed the hysteria behind the label. SEX OFFENDER does not equal CHILD MOLESTER. Until these labels are changed the perception will not change.
Wake up American: our politicians use smoke and mirros to make you think you are safer and all they are doing is wasting your tax dollars to win votes. “Getting smart on crime means moving beyond useless labels and catch phrases, and instead relying on science and date to shape policy” Attorney General Eric Holder
MomofTwoKids
September 30th, 2009
3:32 pm
Of all the former sex offenders I know, not one has re-offended OR hurt a child. Not one. I’d let them live with me but the requirements where I live — again…..they’re not ALLOWED to live with me because of WHERE I live! The guys that chat online with teens — are not criminals – they are stupid. The guys that sleep with their girlfriends consensually are not criminals, they just were stupid in the moment. I agree that child molestors and violent rapists (which ARE VERY RARE) should be probably watched closely – but the other dudes that made ONE mistake and have served their time, give em a break — they had no true victims and I’m sure the “victims” would say the same thing — “give em a darn break, we had sex together – it wasn’t just HIM doing it” – ya know? I’m just sick of all the people calling ALL sex offenders pervs and child molestors — MOST are NOT.
TP
September 30th, 2009
4:00 pm
NIF:
You must have missed this part of the article:
“The Georgia Sex Offender Registration Review Board, an official body, assessed a sample of offenders on the registry last year and concluded that 65% of them posed little threat. Another 30% were potentially threatening, and 5% were clearly dangerous.”
It does not bother me at all to treat child molestors like the scum they are. However, the sex offender registry is pretty much useless if 65%(not .0001% like you say) are not dangerous predators. It is not only people who had underage sex on the list. There was an example a few years ago of a man who was drinking on a golf course and urinated on a tree. A group of girls saw him and even though he was not doing anything sexual he was convicted of exposure and placed on the offender list. There was a man who robbed a Dairy Queen when he was seventeen. Because he did not allow anyone to leave during the robbery, he was convicted of kidnapping. Since there were underage patrons in the Dairy Queen he was placed on the registry because he kidnapped an underage person.
According to the Review Board such people make up 65% of the registry. Trim the registry down to the dangerous people, and then show them no mercy.
Christina
September 30th, 2009
4:17 pm
I don’t give a rats behind how some “seemingly minor” sex offenders are inconvenienced in the course of keeping child rapists away from the kids. If it were up to me…THEY WOULD NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY!
Bethany
September 30th, 2009
4:41 pm
Enter your comments here
State Rep. Jerry Keen really should invite all these people he has uprooted to live with him.
He’s a good Christian,he won’t have a problem with forgiveness.
Not all people on the registry are baby rapers or predators.
The laws need to be made to fit the crime.
No one wants the worst of the worst out roaming free.
The people who have done their time and who are not a threat to society
ought to be left the hell alone to work to provide for their families.
All this childish sniping back and forth is embarrassing.
commonsense
September 30th, 2009
4:55 pm
Everyone needs to stop and really look at what we are talking about.Many of you are so caught up in one uping the others comment theat they lost sight of the topic.We are not talking about child molesters or rapists.The term sex offender is more broad than saying car when talking about what vehicle is good or bad.We are talking about those people with low level crimes that have not reoffended and have proven they are no more a threat than you and me.The 34 yr old man whose offense was when he was 15 or the women at 17 are what we are talking about. These people do not deserve to be ruined.The purpose of the correctional system is to correct behavior not to destroy lives.I agree there are the 5% or so that need to be monitored but not the people we are talking about.Why do we spend time and money monitoring and destroying people who are no threat?Thats crazy and a waste of both resources and good people.Lets never confuse the topic with child molesters as so many of you like to do. Thats wrong and unfair to those who have already proven themselves but are forced to live on the streets or in the woods like animals.Be fair to the subject and you will see what is wrong with the system in place.
TP
September 30th, 2009
5:03 pm
Christina,
The MAJORITY of the people on the list and being inconvenienced are not child rapists. You can do anything you like to the predators. The problem is that between 65 and 95 percent of the people on the list are NOT predators. All it would take to make this problem go away is to take the non-predatory offenses off of the offender list.
This list right now is useless. If you look at it and see four people close to your house it might concern you. However, you will miss the actual predator who is a farther away because people who had sex when they were 17 is closer to your house. You cannot find the actual dangerous people on the list because they are hidden by the non-danderous ones.
noncitizen2009
September 30th, 2009
8:24 pm
TP (9/30 at 5:03 pm): You are correct about almost everything you said. The thing you are wrong about is you said, “All it would take to make this problem go away is to take the non-predatory offenses off of the offender list.”
In reality, these laws are not appropriate for anyone. There is not a single expert in our entire country that supports laws that force ANYONE on the Registries to not have stable housing or employment. There are no experts who support the housing restrictions in general. All of the experts who testified multiple times for Georgia’s legislative committees told them that these laws were a terrible idea. But of course, Georgia’s legislators are more intelligent than any experts are.
Experts who have decades of experience in the field do not support these laws. Decent Americans do not. Politicians do. Uninformed people do. Hateful people do.
The Registries are negligibly and unnecessarily “useful”. Responsible parents and people simply do not need them. However, the Registries could still exist and not be so bad if we Americans could simply just “use” them responsibly simply to be “informed” about who was around them. Remember, that was the huge lie that was told when the Registries were initially conceived? That they were needed to keep people “informed” and that the Registries were for “public safety” and “protecting children”.
The problem is that Americans could not use the information responsibly. They couldn’t use the information just to be “informed”. So, the Registries turned out to be the basis and foundation needed to create the huge punishment/harassment mechanism that it is today. And that has made the entire thing a huge waste of time, money, effort, and other very limited resources that could have instead been used to actually combat sexual offending. Unfortunately though, that is not the worst of it. The entire Registration mechanism is completely counterproductive. It promotes recidivism. It leads to far more sexual crimes than it could ever hope to prevent.
The facts are clear. There are no informed, intelligent people who support these laws.
noncitizen2009
September 30th, 2009
8:29 pm
Christina (9/30 at 4:17 pm): If you think Registration or any of Georgia’s other laws are “keeping child rapists away from kids” you truly are a completely uninformed fool. The people on Registries are not being monitored in any way, shape, form, or fashion. I understand that won’t make people who like the Registries feel better but I promise you that is reality.
rwsmom
September 30th, 2009
8:31 pm
I read all these comments and shutter with sadness. To those who want to see sex offenders be put to death or sentenced for life in prison….. My 17 year old son was one of them. The week he was arrested, 3 other boys, under the age of 18 were also. I don’t know thier whole stories, but I can tell you this, my son was charged and convicted of possession of child pornography. These were homemade video’s of his girlfriend, that she had personally made and given to him. Two weeks after his 18th birthday, he was arrested. Now he has to live a life with a felony conviction and register for life as an SO. Please tell me where the justice is and why he should have to be labled as the same thing a 30, 40, 50 or 60 year old man who kidnaps, rapes and murders a small child? There is a LOT of difference between these stories/convictions. Further more, don’t be caught relieving yourself on a bush! You too could go to prison and register! Shame on all of you who have no heart for justice and the truth! This could happen to you, your child, niece or nephew! Open your eyes America! Stop asking lawmakers to make laws that aren’t thought out, that make you feel safe. Somewhere down the road, these laws WILL impact you too! Maybe a real pedophile will move in to your neighborhood and no one will feel the least bit worried, why? Because the registry is coming down to where no one can differentiate between teen hormones and perverts!
noncitizen2009
September 30th, 2009
8:45 pm
TP (9/30 at 4:00 pm): Sorry, I’m just sort of scanning all these posts backwards.
Do you really think someone who robs a Dairy Queen with a gun and holds people hostage is not particularly dangerous? I know that a good number of people who like the Registries and think they are just grand, really do believe that. To me, that is a pretty good example of the insane thinking that has driven how we’ve ended up with these idiotic laws.
You do understand how 90+% of child molestation occurs, don’t you? It is not by force and it is certainly not by some stranger. It almost always occurs by someone the child trusts grooming the child over a significant period of time. If you are a parent who has a person who was convicted of child molestation living next door, you simply don’t allow your child to have an intimate relationship with the person. You teach your children about grooming and sexual abuse and until you know that they will not be a victim, you supervise everything. It is that easy.
If you have a person living next door who will go into a building and rob people at gunpoint, I’m not sure that’s so safe. Perhaps, just maybe, the person enjoys drinking and taking drugs as well. And perhaps one day the person will decide to break into your home with a gun to rob it too. Maybe the person will put the gun in your child’s face until you tell him/her where all the valuables are.
I would much rather live in a neighborhood full of child molesters than around people with guns who drink and use drugs. Call me crazy, but I know I can protect my children from child molesters. Now child murderers, like John Couey, that’s another story and I’ve got other means for that. But of course we don’t even bother Registering people who have only negligently (or even intentionally) gotten children killed. That makes the Registries make more sense, huh?
Wendy Whitaker is not Roman Polanski « East Metro Atlanta Libertarian Party
September 30th, 2009
9:36 pm
[...] Roman Polanski deserves to be punished for his sex crime, which actually involved the rape of an underage girl. However, Wendy Whitaker is a victim of a bad law. [...]
TP
September 30th, 2009
9:52 pm
noncitizen2009,
I think you misunderstood my point in the description of the DQ robbery. He was stupid, but what he did would not be any indication of a tendency to molest children. If the list is intended to identify people who pose a threat to children, then it should ONLY list people who are actually a threat to children.
TP
September 30th, 2009
9:59 pm
Oops, I misunderstood your post. I would agree with you that this individual might be dangerous in general. However, the stated point of the list is to identify individuals who are sexually dangerous to children. Putting an armed robber on the list does nothing but give a DA campaign points. Also, you stated that if you have a person living next door who was convicted of child molestation you should keep your children from having an intimate relationship with them. If the list does not exist, how would you know? As to my previous posts, I believe with the current system you would not really know either because he could be a child molestor, or he could have urinated on a tree.
Sex Offender Issues
September 30th, 2009
10:29 pm
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com
I am totally against ANY form of abuse to any human being. And I believe anyone who murders another human being should be in prison for the rest of their life (until they die). I do not believe in the death penalty for anyone. Also, I believe that once a person has been in and out of prison and has served their probation and parole, done everything required of them, and what was signed on the “contract” when they took the plea, none of this should be required of them, none of it. The state cannot tear up a contract like this, which they are basically doing, it’s unconstitutional. Many people, if they had known they would be faced with all this, they would have NOT taken a plea deal. And the courts are very aware of this and this is why they made it retroactive; thus violating ex-post facto laws! They should be allowed to get on with their life as if nothing happened. I’m not saying for it to be removed from their record, but, the crime should be removed from public view and background checks, they should not have any more restrictions, shaming, etc. If they commit another crime, then they face a lot more punishment, like everything else is treated.
When an ex-offender is forced to move from his/her home, thus having to sell it, cannot find another home within the law due to the residency “buffer” zones, get fired from their jobs due to being on the registry, cannot find a new job due to being on the registry, their husband/wife lose their jobs due to a significant other being on the registry, their children lose their friends and are harassed and bullied in school due to a family member being on the registry, thus destroying the children’s lives, ex-offenders are forced into homelessness and to live under bridges, harassed by police, neighbors and probation/parole officers, have to wear “I’m a sex offender T-shirt” or have a neon green license plate on ALL their cars, have “sex offender” on their drivers license and forced to renew their licenses every year, forced from shelters during tornadoes or hurricanes, cannot give blood at some places due to being discriminated against for being on the sex offender registry, denied housing due to being on the registry, signs placed in their yards inviting harassment and ridicule from the neighbors, forced to move when the neighbors start picketing outside the ex-offenders home, the list is endless.
I THINK THIS IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, BEYOND THE EXTREME!
concerned
September 30th, 2009
10:54 pm
It is truly appalling how many ignorant people there are reading this blog. Noncitizen2009 is dead-on correct. These ‘laws’ are only there to placate the ’soccer moms’ and the Nancy (dis) Grace believers because they have bought in to the hype. That is all this is…the explosion of propaganda. (You do realize she was a former prosecutor!) All these do is give a false sense of security. How many children have been protected by these registration or residency laws? The FACTS show molestations happen from someone the child knows, not this ’stranger danger’. How many people have been affected, rightly or wrongly by these laws? Thousands, maybe 20 -30,000 here in GA (including spouses and biological/step children, extended family, employers). How does putting sex offenders on these registries protect children? Why wasn’t the girl who was allegedly fondled by the cabbie protected? What law needs to be enacted to prevent that from happening? Huh? What, no answer…. That’s right. There is no answer. Sometimes evil things happen and for the legislature (narcissistic as they are – they didn’t listen to the plethora of experts in past sessions) to attempt to pass such a law (I’m sure someone will introduce a bill, like Jerry Keen) is ludicrous and a waste of time. But they really will want to try.
What needs to happen is mass education on the truth. Sex offenders have lower recidivism rates than murderers, than drug possession/ selling, than property crimes. But in many publications, sex offenders are incorrectly listed as the HIGHEST chance of re-offending. If you get one of those crazy urban legend emails going around warning of false wal-mart shopping scams, or that cell numbers are going to be sold to telemarkers, one can check out the validity by checking out snopes.com or others. For Joe Schmo, when even the FBI cannot get their facts straight by not citing the DOJ (Dept of Justice) studies, then they have bought into the myth of erroneous data. Is there really any wonder why peoples beliefs are wrong?
When you wish the degradation of rights to a group of people, no matter how unlikeable, you risk it happening to you. The slippery slope has begun. Since society sees fit to have a sex offender registry why don’t we have a DUI registry, because more children are killed or hurt by DUI’s than sex offenders. What about a speed limit registry, since children are killed or maimed by speeders (the ones through school zones, too). And what will these registries accomplish? I’d really like to know.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
-Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Publ. Houghton Miflin, 1943, Page 403
Tina Trent
October 1st, 2009
8:57 am
Hawkins was 16, not 15, and his victim was younger that 12 — how much younger? Well, you clearly don’t care to find out, do you? If you’re not going to contact the prosecutor and get the real facts in a case, which you ought to do, don’t you think you should — at bare minimum — take a cursory glance at the criminal records?
And he got a long sentence for two decades ago. It must have been a pretty disturbing crime.
Also, the crime for which he was convicted was attempted sexual battery of a child under 12. How do you justify allowing him, the convicted offender, to characterize the crime differently? He isn’t any “suspect innocent until proven guilty,” Jay — he is convicted of attempted sexual assault of a child under 12. You need to correct the record.
a_mom
October 1st, 2009
9:28 am
Jay, did you bother to read the story in the AJC today about the horrendous suffering and death of poor little 6-yr old Christopher Barrios? And you wonder why no one wants a sex offender for their neighbor?! Studies show that they can’t be cured and they will always have perverted impulses. I just wish it was enforced for neighbors to be notified when a sex offender moves into their neighborhood. Christopher’s family had no idea he was walking past that sick pervert every day.
Sally
October 1st, 2009
10:19 am
What about someone accused by a crazy ex-wife of molesting their daughter at an early age simply because she is angry that he will not give her more money. He has given more than child support since the divorce. He never molested the daughter, spent 6 months in jail, which was driving him crazy, was offered a deal of pleading “no contest” with 5 years probation or going to trial and if he did loose the minimum sentence would be 8 years. Thinking the 5 years probation would be no problem, because this really is a decent man, chose to get out of jail and on with his life. Which by the way he thought he could step right back into. The lawyer he had spent his last $10,000 on gave him no advice or idea how hard life would be for him with this conviction attached to him like an albatross around his neck. His buddy he was living with is too close to a school so he has no where to live. He was living and working in another state where the police picked him up and transported him to where he was jailed leaving his car behind so he has no transportation, no job, no money and nowhere to live. What is this man to do? There are criminals who have committed murder and released to go on with their lives like nothing happened. How has our judicial system helped this once productive citizen?
debbie
October 1st, 2009
11:35 am
Enter your comments here the laws are foolish and give people a sense of confidence that is wrong! just because an offender doesn’t live near a school or playground doesn’t mean that he can’t walk there! DUH! further, the recidivism rate for class 1 offenders (internet porn) is low, very low. they should not be lumped in a category with those that have contact. the overload on the registry makes it difficult or impossible to follow the truly violent and dangerous offenders.
Bodine
October 1st, 2009
1:55 pm
a_mom,perhaps I’ve somehow overlooked it but,
I can’t recall having read anywhere,anything to
suggest that Jay is defensive of Child Sexual
predators.I also have not seen anything to in-
dicate he is for leniency for them(beyond the
rule of law and common decency).To me this is
the basis for what is wrong with this entire dia-
logue.The simple truth is all these should not be
just lumped together.I believe that Jay’s views
are completely fair and honest.Now if you still
disagree,again I ask;why are there no beautiful,
young boy child molesting schoolteachers living
in this banishment camp?
J D
October 2nd, 2009
12:05 pm
“why are there no beautiful,
young boy child molesting schoolteachers living
in this banishment camp?”
>>> Because women are always viewed as “the victims” and Men the “Perpetrators”.
The Law views Mens’ Penis’s as Lethal weapons and ’cause Women don’t have them, they are treated differently.
It’s a case of Preferential treatment based on Gender.
Many Females who have committed a sex crime against a minor have not had to register with the registry. The Law thinks these females simply need counseling and probation and that’s it. If it was a Man, forget it…Or as the queen-of-hearts in Alice-in-Wonderland once said “OFF WITH HIS HEAD!”
Double-Standardd…..gotta love ‘em. *rolls eyes*
ROAR For Truth
October 4th, 2009
10:19 am
http://www.vimeo.com/6888581
Bethany
October 4th, 2009
6:06 pm
Enter your comments here
ROAR For Truth
Truth?
I think not. It’s a shame you spend so much energy creating hate filled propaganda.
The facts are out there for those to read. The facts reveal the truth.
ROARfortruth
October 4th, 2009
9:54 pm
Bethany, the truth is out there but you have to willing to believe it. Why in the world are sex offender activists hanging out with know pro pedophile activist groups like NAMBLA? These pedos want to ABOLISH sex offender restrictions so they can have sex w/children without facing criminal penalities.
SOSEN wants to abolish all restrictions and tell me, how that will protect children? I spread the “truth” because I care more for the defenseless child over any the so called rights of registered sex offenders. Read this and open your eyes!
http://roarfortruth.blogspot.com/2009/09/sosen-village.html
concerned
October 5th, 2009
12:48 am
RoarforTruth, the truth is YOU are the one that needs to seek some guidance. You have been blinded by a very twisted view that all sex offenders wish to have sex with children. You couldn’t be more wrong. Where you came up with that is, well, asinine.
SOSEN’s views DO NOT advocate anything of the sort that you say – in FACT they have this on their web site:
“SOSEN upholds fair and just laws that are evidence based, are effective and that protect the Constitutional rights of all citizens. The mission of SOSEN is to educate the public, the media,
law-enforcement, and legislators regarding the facts, based on current research, of sexual abuse. We are striving to incorporate fact based solutions thus helping to change the laws that affect former offenders, their loved ones,victims and the communities where they live.
We seek to also provide support for victims, former offenders and their families.”
FURTHER:
“Affiliations :
SOSEN is committed to promoting public safety and community awareness. All members of SOSEN have agreed to abstain from any activity that is not consistent with the organization’s goals. This requires that any person who is a member of SOSEN will in no way affilliate him/herself with any organization, including but not limited to NAMBLA, Boy Chat, Girl Chat, which promotes inappropriate sexual behavior. Any person who has information that suggests a member of SOSEN is engaged in inappropriate conduct should notify SOSEN staff immediately.”
Please show me *where* they have ANY connection to NAMBLA. You can’t because it doesn’t exist! SOSEN and others like it (sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com) advocate the reduction or elimination of laws enacted on knee-jerk reactions and NOT on sound, FACT based reasoning and evidence based research. And no, I’m not a member of any organization, just a guy who knows his facts.
You ’spread the lies’ for others to quote and to continue to promote this moral hysteria. Read my above post. Do some FACT based research, and not let your emotions guide you. For every sex offender is not the John Couey’s of the world; in fact if your daughter or son has EVER texted or had texted to them an inappropriate (nude) picture in the eyes of the law they are a sex offender (distribution of child pornography). If you say ‘my child would never do that’ is either correct (they have no cell phone/ email address) or you are deluding yourself. (What did YOU do when you were a kid that your parents would be horrified to know?)
So please don’t give the ‘defenseless child’ BS. Open YOUR eyes and seek the truth. Quoting you and adding my own: “the truth is out there but you have to willing to believe it”, even if it doesn’t agree with your preconceived views.
Mike Gregg
October 5th, 2009
5:40 pm
Hey Concerned, ROAR is dead on right! Go do your own research unless you intend to believe the SOSEN propaganda. Just because SOSEN posts some thing, does not make it true!
“SOSEN upholds fair and just laws that are evidence based, are effective and that protect the Constitutional rights of all citizens.”
You really believe that, then why did SOSEN CEO Linda Pehrson sign the RSOL Petition seeking to abolish ALL sex offender restrictions? SOSEN COO Mary Duval sign the same as well. Here is the RSOL petition, scroll down and read the 8 points and see the signatories names for yourself. ROAR knows how to research, do you?
Here is the original pedo site the petition was posted in 1998:
http://wikisposure.com/images/8/80/Ipcersol.png
Plenty of evidence if you research the “names” listed…NAMBLA members! Go Research for yourself if you think I’m lying.
Mike Gregg
October 5th, 2009
5:41 pm
RSOL Petition, forgot to include link:
http://www.reformsexoffenderlaws.org/statement.php
concerned
October 5th, 2009
7:01 pm
Just where does it say they want to “abolish ALL sex offender restrictions?” I could not find that statement in either the two sites you mention. Should we have some sort of registry? Yes, for law enforcement use ONLY. Society has proved it cannot handle the information and many people (those on the list and ‘innocent’ children of those on the list) have been hurt or demonized for it. If you really want every ’sex offender’ (using this term in its full breadth – ’sexting’ teens, rapists, molesters, and those who finished their sentences) in Georgia and around the country listed on some sort of public registry, I pity you. For you don’t grasp the severity of the precipice we are on then you really are a piece of work. Wait until someone close to you is involved and see if your position changes. There was a female legislator a few years (don’t recall her name) ago here in Georgia that was just as gung-ho to implement these new laws as Jerry Keen. Then her son was charged with a sex offense. Suddenly, the whole picture changed. She resigned from the committee and faded away. Do some ‘research’ and ask her now what should be done.
It would seem your mind is made up on the issue. No amount of common sense posting, no amount of verifiable studies will apparently change you mind.
Here is the 8 points from RSOL (for those who are interested):
Therefore, we call for the immediate reform of America’s sex offender laws33 – especially the state and Federal sex offender registries and the life-time civil commitment laws. We support the following immediate actions:
1. Abolish all provisions of state and Federal sex offender registries that publicly shame offenders. There should be no internet or other public posting of the identity, photograph, address, workplace or personal information of any offender, nor should this information be available to the public at police stations or registry offices. In cases of genuinely violent sex crimes, especially against young children, and with a specific finding of a likelihood to re-offend, registration may be required, but information will be shared only among police officials, or if a court rules it appropriate, with institutions serving children or others who might be vulnerable to abuse. Strong penalties should be levied against police or others privy to the registration information who violate the privacy of the offenders.
2. Abolish all life-time civil commitment for sex offenders34 who have completed prison sentences and/or parole and probation. In cases of violent offenses and specific findings of a likelihood to re-offend, carefully constructed court hearings, with medical advice and full due process, should determine if the person may be further incarcerated, and then only for a short time and with regular review. The ultimate goal of all measures aimed at sex offenders should be their return to the community when they are not likely to re-offend.
3. Stop public vilification and demonization of sex offenders. Oppose the use in the media or by public officials of obviously pejorative language with regard to offenders. Label only actually violent acts as violent crimes – define violence simply and logically as a physical attack or threat that causes real harm.35 Use of the term “pedophile” should be extremely limited and accurate.36 Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty.
4. De-criminalize all consensual sexual activities among teenagers.37 Stop all required sex offender registration for minors.38
5. Abolish all laws that provide the death penalty* or life in prison without parole for sex offenders.
6. Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights.
7. Provide accurate information and support valid research about sex offender characteristics39 and recidivism rates.40
8. Help sex offenders re-enter society by abolishing measures which make it difficult for them to find a place to live41 and a decent job.42 Encourage support groups for sex offenders, including help with finding housing, employment, and effective treatment, before their release and afterward.
Bethany
October 6th, 2009
1:48 pm
Enter your comments here
SOSEN & NAMBLA have their own agendas…
The registration laws should be revised to fit the crime.
The AWA has strayed away from its’ original intent.
No one wants pedophiles running loose,that is not what all this is about.
Abolish,no.
Revise,yes!
Jen
October 11th, 2009
10:15 pm
If these people didn’t molest kids, they wouldn’t be homeless now. Maybe they should have considered the consequences. Sure, an 18 year old who sleeps with his 17 year old girlfriend should be categorized differently. I can see adjusting the law on that one, but otherwise, I don’t want child molesters near my kids. Sorry they are in the woods, but I’d be a lot sorrier if they hurt my child. Perhaps they can move somewhere else with different housing options. It’s a big state.
ieee
October 14th, 2009
7:04 pm
The governments which have passed these “sex offender” laws are criminal regimes. It is not acceptable in the United States to pass laws which retroactively punish and harass people who were legally sentenced years and even decades ago. That might be okay in China, North Korea, Iran, or similar places, but not in the U.S.
If these criminal governments and the uninformed “good” people who support them want to have their registries or whatever, then fine, have them as long as the people who are listed on them are not punished or harassed in any manner and if they do not need to be involved in any manner. Then the laws would almost be acceptable.
People listed on these registries should not have to take extraordinary measures (or any measures) at any time simply to keep from being arrested. Because that is the ONLY real purpose of these laws. Only a true fool still believes the lies that they are about “public safety” or “protecting children”.
Keith Richard Radford Jr
October 17th, 2009
4:13 am
Sex laws have been built on misconceptions and myth.
The Supreme Court just ruled on sex offender laws where some factions of our government think by some inert reasoning that sex offender should be quarantined or executed. Video taken in another country shows where sex offenders were placed on a pole much like the Catholics use to use a pyramid shaped object and have them sit on it and spin, the pole travels through the body looking for the throat but if not found its ok because the sharpened end of the pole will come out somewhere to the delight of these very strange people who think such thoughts are a bit barbaric. The heritage of the act is in its self a brutal throwback to violent uneducated people who are so obsessed with any sex & the only way to deal with this kind of “hierarchy” of historic hysteria. A word taken from hysterectomy, hysteria is tied to castration, we are supposed to be the most advanced nation and we still have a death penalty when the rest of the world except for some nations we are still warring with/selling weapons too, while other nations went home our weapons dealers and torture lovers delighting in support for the death of people they don’t know or want to simply because they don’t know how to get money with out taking it from someone by force. Is that supposed to include mutilations? In my humble opinion this alone “is” terrorist activities as much as severed hands, ears, heads, or making a case with nothing more than an obsession justified by lies. The registry’s origin in the Jim Crow hang~um laws that brought disgrace to our nation allowing thieves and murderous societal bigots who have trashed any shot at making good of a program in its design to make money destroying our nation and its people. We can not survive using this behavior model because we are compounding the problem since the numbers are increasing to include the children they purport to protect.
The doctoring, castration/hysterectomy/health care/physic care of people through sex laws that have damaged everyone it has touched. What about the people who are being used by the Medicare programs that requires these mutilations for both men and woman after they take their means of support? Digging around in someone’s genitalia because you want what a weaker nation? Can’t you see? You have created the model and it is worthless! Why don’t we just indiscriminately kill people we don’t know? That is statically the next sex offender, because over 90% of all new offences are committed by someone “not” on the sex offender registry and the numbers are increasing not decreasing so as a behavior model this is really worthless.
So what is the use of such laws as the sex offender registry other than to terrorize people? With the murder of so many sex offenders and the continued disregard for life by the use of the registry it will be no time at all before the federal government will be held liable for their deaths through federal court. Best regards
SOIssues
November 2nd, 2009
7:38 pm
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com
Has anyone done a follow up story to this article?
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/homeless-ga-sex-offenders-148558.html
Joel Steele
November 13th, 2009
9:58 am
Take that damn unconstitutional Adam Walsh Act and shove it up John Walsh’s ass. The sex offender registry should be abolished because it violates the United States Constitution. You want to protect your children; keep your damn children off the internet. Don’t give your children cell phones. Nobody under 18 should be allowed on websites like myspace and Tagged. Nobody under 16 should be allowed to have a cell phone. Nobody under 16 should be allowed to use a computer without direct adult supervision. It should be a criminal offense for anyone under 16 using a cell phone. It should be a criminal offense for anyone under 16 using a computer without direct adult supervision. It is time people start using their brains instead of punishing people who served their sentences.
tracey ledford
January 16th, 2010
11:21 am
i have no sympathy for them! they are the ones who hurt innocent children, raped women and so on. obviuosily you do not have children and i doubt that you have been raped either. where they live is their problem, not ours. they have no right to complain about their living situation! they did wrong and they should be punished, i dont think that they were punished enough, i think that the death penalty should be punishment for ALL SEX OFFENDERS AND SEX PREDATORS. ANYONE WHO MOLESTS OR RAPES A CHILD OR AN ADULT SHOULD BE PUT TO DEATH IN THE ELECTRIC CHAIR. SO PEOPLE DONT COMPLAIN IF THE LAWS ARENT DOING ENOUGH TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN AND OURSELVES, WE HAVE ONLY OURSELVES TO BLAME! WE NEED TO CHANGE THE LAWS AND QUITE COMPLAINIG ABOUT THEM. WE NEED TO STAND TOGETHER AND CONFRONT THE POLITICIAN’S WHO DECIDE THE LAWS AND LET THEM KNOW THAT WE WANT STRONGER, TOUGHER LAWS ON THIS ISSUE
INFORMED
January 20th, 2010
11:45 pm
ISN’T IT GREAT HOW MANY IGNORANT FOOLS ARE ON HERE?! Learn to respect other’s opinions. Atleast the law should differentiate among the severity of the sex offenses. Let’s say your 17 year old daughter sent a naked picture to an 18 year old boy. Is that his fault? He didn’t take that picture, nor did he physically force her to send it to him. Yet you still press charges and he is marked for life as a nasty kiddie porn freak, A SEX OFFENDER. This isn’t right. And in this particular case, your daughter is just as guilty because she distributed it. You don’t want her marked for life. Meanwhile, there are molesters (one in particular I can think of) that have gone free because of a technicality; Perhaps the child used adult lingo (”blowjob”), so they say they can’t prosecute. So while this creep goes free, the rest of the world is bent on ruining the life of a fairly innocent person who made one little, simple mistake. And they pay dearly.
Melissa Cochrane
January 26th, 2010
7:26 am
The sex offenders who served their sentence should be left alone. All children should be supervised 24/7. It’s the children who need the supervision, not the sex offender.
bonnie
February 15th, 2010
10:33 pm
most of the people that has commited these sex crimes where abused as a child themself,and alot of this sex violence thats coming out is due to the world selling the porn in every store you walk in .i say its the worlds fault we have failed by lowering ourself to sell such garbage! and yes most of these crimes are commited by a family members so i garantee you at least one person out of every family has done a sexual act in one way or another that they know is wrong!! check your family!
B.N.
March 24th, 2010
7:56 pm
(Dan Gunderson, “A Better Approach to Sex Offender Policy.” Minnesota Public Radio, June 18th, 2007) “Lisa Sample, a criminology professor at the University of Nebraska Omaha, says…
“Misinformation and a lack of information often shapes sex offender policy…Most of the legislators in her study said their primary source of information was the news media.”
In most cases, lawmakers didn’t read studies or reports relevant to legislation they supported.
She says it’s clear most sex offender legislation follows the abduction and murder of a child, and the resulting public outrage.
Few people are aware a child is at greater risk of sexual abuse from family than strangers. If people understood that, they would support more programs to prevent sexual abuse.
In Minnesota, a panel of experts recently completed a comprehensive report to serve as a guide for sex offender policy in the state. One of the report’s authors says the biggest challenge is just getting lawmakers to read it.
Spanish Harlem
May 14th, 2010
2:04 am
Hello all,,, heres how i see it,,,,the sex offender laws are assumption laws,,,and they label everybody on it as predatory! I feel that just because someone committed a “Sex offense” they arent necessary a Sex offender! just as,,just because a person manages to put a stripe of paint on a canvas doesnt make them an Artist! If a person Identifies as a Sex offender,,he becomes what he is,,,and these laws forces the offender to identify as such! if you identify as a thief,, then you will steal,, its a given! But i call these laws assumption laws,, because they ASSUME just because a 18 year old has Consensual sex with a 15 year old, that he will rape a 5 year old or another 15 year old,, to me that like saying that if a man is attracted to a woman,, he will rape all women! I for one dont condone child molestation,,,,,but also consider that in the eyes of the law,,,Consensual sex with a 12 year old is rape ! Even when the 12 year old liked it,,,the picture painted will be a tall dark shadow hovering over a 40 lb child in bunny sleeping suit holding a stuffed animal who is scrunching in a corner in tears! Grant it,, the Adult Should KNOW better! And to end up, refering to some comments in here,, i once read a Criminal Justice book and the former judge who wrote it stated,,,On the same logic that the law uses to make people register,,,ANYone who ever committed a felony should be on it!! not just Sex crimes,,,,her point being,,,A disregard in human life and peoples feelings as a WHOLE has to be considered,, and not just Sexual,,,Yes,, a bank robber is Just as bad as a Sex offender,, Yes,, a wife beater is just as bad as a Rapist! When you hurt people , you hurt people,,,doesnt matter whether you get off on it or not!!
Spanish Harlem
May 14th, 2010
2:09 am
I read somewhere that 70 percent of Sex offenses doesnt even involve children,,,,Squeezing a girls boobs at a party could constitute rape if she complains! i once had a friend who was charged with Attempted rape because he tried to kiss a girl! And a judge once stated that in most child molestation cases , there is little to NO evidence !! All a person has to do is SAY you touched a child and you are a goner!!!
Spanish Harlem
May 14th, 2010
2:20 am
one more point and ill leave Yall alone,,,,3 boys could take 3 girls to a secluded area,,,,,all 3 could make moves on their dates,,,,All three had the same intentions,, and ONE girl complains,,,the one guy who was with that ONE girl is arrested and tried and put on the registry,,,,,Point is,,,,all 3 guys had the same intentions,, they all made the same moves,, only one had to register,, what made that ONE any more dangerous than the other 2 ?? 3 boys with the same intentions,,same desires,,,but only one gets on the registry! That ONE boy was victim to that ONE girls Perception,,,That ONE girls perception Changed that One boys Life FOREVER! Just think , for every ONE guy you have on the registry,, i gaurentee that there are dozens more who has the the same thing and is NOT registered! If we all look back in our lives we may all find that we have all committed what might, by todays laws be considered rape! the laws throw that word around loosely nowadays,, Rape, malestation,,,child abuse,,,,,and if thats the case, i bet we were all raped, abused or molested by todays standards! So,, watch out for Sex offenders who arent convicted or Registered! And statics says that 90 percent of new sex crimes are committed by poeple NOT on the registry,, and Now,,,70 percent of Sex Crimes are committed by Juveniles themselves! and Juveniles commited 50 percent of Crimes altogether!
Ron Hyatt
August 29th, 2010
10:59 am
Georgia. Government of the idiots, by the idiots, for the idiots.
Makes you wish for a corrupt Banana Republic, where at least money thrown at the right place gets your problem fixed, no questions asked, instead of the self righteous craphole that is AmeriDUH.
jovan
August 30th, 2010
9:56 am
Anti-choice activists are child molesters by default, since they support parental rights for violent pedophiles.
We need to prosecute all of the doctors who force women to remain pregnant against their will for rape. Forced pregnancy is sexual assault and it should be treated as such.
We also need to prosecute the entire anti-choice movement for terrorism, too.