Comments on: Palin, DeMint should take lessons from this guy

By: Henry Aaron does the healthcare take down | AnnotatedOpinions.com

Henry Aaron does the healthcare take down | AnnotatedOpinions.com — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:07:00 +0000

[...] Here are excerpts from an op-ed by Henry J. Aaron in the Washington Post. This is our third piece in the take down series. Here, Aaron reviews a column by Robert J. [...]

By: Looking at the big Afghan picture | AnnotatedOpinions.com

Looking at the big Afghan picture | AnnotatedOpinions.com — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:40:11 +0000

[...] Here are excerpts from an op-ed by robin Wright in the Washington Post. This is our third piece in the take down series. Here, Wright reviews bigger picture reasons for [...]

By: John Mudd » Blog Archive » Healthcare Mudslingers: Once a Liar, Always a Liar

Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:48:32 +0000

[...] quest for control is evident throughout history, and we need only follow the threads: As the veil dropped during Ronald Regan’s presidential speech, we see him as a mouthpiece for the [...]

By: Ruth Marcus does the healthcare takedown | AnnotatedOpinions.com

Ruth Marcus does the healthcare takedown | AnnotatedOpinions.com — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:26:28 +0000

[...] Here are excerpts from an op-ed by Ruth Marcus in the Washington Post. This is our second piece in the take down series. Here, Marcus reviews some of the baseless claims [...]

By: Bookman does the takedown | AnnotatedOpinions.com

Bookman does the takedown | AnnotatedOpinions.com — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:13:16 +0000

[...] Here are excerpts from an op-ed by Jay Bookman in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Bookman takes us back to 1961 Reagan to illustrate how ridiculous some of the arguments against [...]

By: Sarah Palin and Jim DeMint Should Take Lessons from Ronald Reagan « Sarah Palin Truth Squad

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:03:34 +0000

[...] Jay Bookman The Atlanta Journal-Constitution [...]

By: USinUK

USinUK — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:18:33 +0000

@@ –

“I’m not a total innocent but damn!!!!”

sorry, but that made me chuckle.

I heard the term used first by John Watters in an interview some 10 years ago (during the same interview, he also introduced the term “helicoptering”, which also made me laugh) … it was also referred to in Sex and the City about 8 years ago …

maybe it’s just we “leftists” that would watch those programs … but, given their ratings, I don’t think so …

By: stands for decibels

stands for decibels — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:14:44 +0000

They have purer MINDS than liberals. Which might very well be truer than we’d like to think. Living in a non-reality based world can do that do you, you know. Conservatives certainly have purity of essence. "Women sense my power, and they seek my life essence. I do not avoid women, Mandrake. But, I do deny them my essence."

By: Normal

Normal — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:12:04 +0000

Mike, if you are talking about me using “Neocon”, then here is something
I want you to read. It was written in 2004 but when I read it, I thought it was a good non-partisan explaination of Conservative and Neo
Conservative. A word or phrase can be taken out of context and be made to seem a slur, but neocon is, in no way, in the same bed as racist, bigot, moron, bed wetter, etc.
Read it, and tell me what you think…
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_196286.html

By: Turd Ferguson

Turd Ferguson — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:11:44 +0000

Point Break.

Good Movie! The only detractor was Keanu “Cant Act” Reeves.