<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After we&#8217;re gone, our machines would keep going</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/</link>
	<description>An Atlanta blog with a little bit of opinion about a whole lot of things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:34:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Allyoop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76429</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76429</guid>
		<description>No dead bodies for the robot, didn&#039;t you hear?  It just goes for shrubs and twigs, it&#039;s a vegetarian robot, see FoxNews correction, http://bit.ly/D2P6u .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No dead bodies for the robot, didn&#8217;t you hear?  It just goes for shrubs and twigs, it&#8217;s a vegetarian robot, see FoxNews correction, <a href="http://bit.ly/D2P6u" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/D2P6u</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandalf, the White! (!)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76252</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandalf, the White! (!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76252</guid>
		<description>Brad Steel! How is raghead a racial slur? We are really only one race, Homo Sapien Sapien. Ethnic Slur? I like that better. You really do know that races can&#039;t interbreed don&#039;t you? SO, that is the one new thing you learnt today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad Steel! How is raghead a racial slur? We are really only one race, Homo Sapien Sapien. Ethnic Slur? I like that better. You really do know that races can&#8217;t interbreed don&#8217;t you? SO, that is the one new thing you learnt today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandalf, the White! (!)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandalf, the White! (!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76205</guid>
		<description>Scooter! That Bourbon better be coming from Lawrenceburg! Rare Breed is my favorite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scooter! That Bourbon better be coming from Lawrenceburg! Rare Breed is my favorite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josef nix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76194</link>
		<dc:creator>josef nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76194</guid>
		<description>DB--good one!  Goin&#039; upstairs, too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DB&#8211;good one!  Goin&#8217; upstairs, too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB, Gwinnettian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76163</link>
		<dc:creator>DB, Gwinnettian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76163</guid>
		<description>J-nix, who you callin&#039; a Jacoboff?

headin&#039; upstairs. Just wanted to add, because it&#039;s fun:

&lt;i&gt;GOOD. There were originally provisions that were going to limit covered care for women - access to reproductive health services for ALL&lt;/i&gt;

Like USinUK said. You don&#039;t like it, get yourself another Preznit elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J-nix, who you callin&#8217; a Jacoboff?</p>
<p>headin&#8217; upstairs. Just wanted to add, because it&#8217;s fun:</p>
<p><i>GOOD. There were originally provisions that were going to limit covered care for women &#8211; access to reproductive health services for ALL</i></p>
<p>Like USinUK said. You don&#8217;t like it, get yourself another Preznit elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josef nix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76160</link>
		<dc:creator>josef nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76160</guid>
		<description>USinUK--that&#039;s Jacobin in the French not the British!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USinUK&#8211;that&#8217;s Jacobin in the French not the British!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josef nix</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-5/#comment-76155</link>
		<dc:creator>josef nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76155</guid>
		<description>DB--which, in all seriousness, is why I prefer the term Jacobin--it fits both cases...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DB&#8211;which, in all seriousness, is why I prefer the term Jacobin&#8211;it fits both cases&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @@</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-4/#comment-76154</link>
		<dc:creator>@@</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76154</guid>
		<description>BE covered.

Trust me:

Take responsibility before AND/OR after. You can&#039;t lose something that was never in existence.

Have fun. I&#039;m off to the gym.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BE covered.</p>
<p>Trust me:</p>
<p>Take responsibility before AND/OR after. You can&#8217;t lose something that was never in existence.</p>
<p>Have fun. I&#8217;m off to the gym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USinUK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-4/#comment-76152</link>
		<dc:creator>USinUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76152</guid>
		<description>@@ -- 

Oh, and way to gloss over the fact that the quote was taken COMPLETELY out of context to the point where it made her say the exact opposite of what she was actually saying.

nice one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@@ &#8212; </p>
<p>Oh, and way to gloss over the fact that the quote was taken COMPLETELY out of context to the point where it made her say the exact opposite of what she was actually saying.</p>
<p>nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USinUK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/07/16/after-were-gone-our-machines-would-keep-going/comment-page-4/#comment-76150</link>
		<dc:creator>USinUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1548#comment-76150</guid>
		<description>@@ - 

&quot;Ginsberg wasn’t on the court during Roe v Wade.&quot;

what.  so lawyers (and women ... and women who are lawyers) aren&#039;t allowed to have opinions on Roe unless they&#039;re in the Supreme Court?

&quot;You do know that in Obama’s new healthcare bill, it has been set up where abortions for those that fall within a specified poverty level will are covered, don’t you? Read it and weep&quot;

GOOD.  There were originally provisions that were going to limit covered care for women - access to reproductive health services for ALL, not just for the wealthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@@ &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;Ginsberg wasn’t on the court during Roe v Wade.&#8221;</p>
<p>what.  so lawyers (and women &#8230; and women who are lawyers) aren&#8217;t allowed to have opinions on Roe unless they&#8217;re in the Supreme Court?</p>
<p>&#8220;You do know that in Obama’s new healthcare bill, it has been set up where abortions for those that fall within a specified poverty level will are covered, don’t you? Read it and weep&#8221;</p>
<p>GOOD.  There were originally provisions that were going to limit covered care for women &#8211; access to reproductive health services for ALL, not just for the wealthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
