A friend and I were discussing the new biography of Donald Rumsfeld, which led to a discussion of just how things went so bad, so quickly in so many areas for the Bush administration.
It got me to thinking. For most of the Bush presidency, I believed that people who pointed the finger at Dick Cheney as the source of most of the presidents’ problems were exaggerating. Yeah, Cheney was a bit of a nut, but the idea that Bush would let himself be manipulated by his vice president to such a degree — I had a hard time believing it.
I don’t anymore.
In fact, I’d argue now that the most important decision of Bush’s presidency — the decision that determined the fate of his administration and to a degree of this country — occurred in July of 2000, when he chose Cheney to be his running mate. From that moment, the elements of tragedy were in place. I suspect history will reach that judgment as well.
If true, that’s of course as much Bush’s fault as Cheney’s. More so, since he was nominally the guy in charge. But there’s no question that at least on the foreign policy front, the Bush administration got a lot smarter about things in its second term, once Rumsfeld — Cheney’s guy — was gone from the Pentagon, Cheney’s influence waned and Condi Rice finally began to assert herself. And the real break, I suspect, came when Bush realized in the summer of 2005 that he had been misled by Cheney and his minions about their role in the Valerie Plame episode.
It’s conjecture at this point, but I suspect that incident opened Bush’s eyes to what had been happening in his own White House, and broke whatever trust remained with his vice president. It would help explain why Bush refused to pardon Scooter Libby as he left office, despite repeated pleas from Cheney and others.
We’ll see what history has to say, but I suspect its general narrative will follow that story line.
251 comments Add your comment
I Report :-) You Whine :-(
June 24th, 2009
8:23 am
Considering that Bush has been the most successful president from the early 1980’s all the way through today, I don’t know what you are jabbering about.
moonbat, winning wars and defeating evil is bad, ain’t it?
Normal
June 24th, 2009
8:25 am
Only one bad decision? Whiner, Bush wasn’t President in the 1980’s…
Jay
June 24th, 2009
8:25 am
Yes, Whiner. One of us is indeed a moonbat.
It’s either the guy who claims Bush is the most successful president since the early ’80s, or it’s me.
Personally, I like my odds.
Mrs. Godzilla
June 24th, 2009
8:26 am
“Considering that Bush has been the most successful president from the early 1980’s all the way through today, I don’t know what you are jabbering about.”
Andy why do you hate Ronald Reagan?
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
8:28 am
I Report You Whine
You can’t honestly think Bush was a good president, do you? Please tell me you were being sarcastic. I’m a strong republican and even I was embarrassed by him.
RW-(the original)
June 24th, 2009
8:28 am
Still haven’t figured out how to square Barry’s new vocal position on Iran, that he claims has been his full throated position all along, with all your glowing praise over his keeping mum being just the right thing to do I see.
It’s always easier to throw out a little red meat to the diehards than it is to think critically about the realities of the present and those currently in power.
With that I’ve got an early day in the forest. I’ll email you a picture if I spot Sanford and Bigfoot out frolicking.
Later!
HDB
June 24th, 2009
8:30 am
Whiner – if you think that the Bushes were good Presidents, you MUST be DELUSIONAL!!
Here are a series of the Bush mistakes:
1) Running for President
Worse foreign policies
2) Selecting Cheney as his running mate
3) NOT listening to Colin Powell
4) Consorting with the Bin Laden family
5) Going after Saddam Hussein under false pretexts
6) Tax breaks for his wealthy friends
7) Bad economic policies
9) Persistent “Bushisms”
More to appear later……
Bill Mack
June 24th, 2009
8:32 am
Jay, You’re just genetically flawed. It should be embarrasing for you to refer to somebody else as “something of a nut.” Check the mirror
Bill
I Report :-) You Whine :-(
June 24th, 2009
8:33 am
I know and you like Obozo too.
I rule.
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
8:34 am
Cheney’s influence waned and Condi Rice finally began to assert herself. And the real break, I suspect, came when Bush realized in the summer of 2005 that he had been misled by Cheney and his minions about their role in the Valerie Plame episode.
Seems like the most plausible explanation, but then there’s also the possibility that those voices furiously working to cover their butts these days just happen to be uttering that version of reality most loudly at the moment.
AmVet
June 24th, 2009
8:36 am
If by successful, the welcher means impotent, incapable, ineffectual, unproductive, useless and weak, I whole heartedly concur.
And I also stand by my contention that there is a strong likelihood that he will ultimately finish in the top 43 of all US Presidents…
Normal
June 24th, 2009
8:36 am
I always thought that President Bush’s biggest mistake was his failure to use the tragedy of 911 and stand as a strong leader of a wounded nation, bring the world wide sympathy together, and join nations into working together for a common cause…Instead he sold it all for a few cheap Republican gains, failed to go after Bin Laden, started an unnecessary and unwanted war, spent like a drunken sailor, and set the rest of the world against us. You did a heckofa job, Georgie…Just sayin’
clyde
June 24th, 2009
8:37 am
I don’t believe Bush chose Cheney.I believe he was told to take him.Republicans wanted Cheney in power and knew he couldn’t win an election for dog catcher so they hung him on Bush like an albatross.I’ll always wonder what a Bush Presidency would have been like without Cheney.
I Report :-) You Whine :-(
June 24th, 2009
8:38 am
Geez, these liberals can’t even comprehend a timeline on their own-
Considering that Bush has been the most successful president from the early 1980’s all the way through today
Which illicited this mouth breathing response-
Only one bad decision? Whiner, Bush wasn’t President in the 1980’s
You reckon? Gosh, what we would ever do without your care and guidance, Abnormal?
Andy why do you hate Ronald Reagan?
Ronald Reagan was elected president in the early 80’s, perhaps this might be why I said “the early 80’s.”
Are you libs fried out this morning or what?
Tank
June 24th, 2009
8:40 am
Again Jay, this is newsworthy? Rehashing Bush! The mantra of the wild-eyed liberals,
Just a shallow attempt to deflect attention from the economy, unemployment, North Korea, Iran and Perez Hilton.
You are simply a hack…
Time Will Tell
June 24th, 2009
8:43 am
The fact of the matter is only time will tell… Bush will be judged on Iraq. If a democratic Iraq exist in 10 years, then it will be hard to continue to bash him. Bush made plenty of mistakes, but I respect the man who made it his number one priority to protect the citizens of this country first. That’s nothing to be embarrassed about.
Mrs. Godzilla
June 24th, 2009
8:43 am
ATLANTA — Gov. Mark Sanford arrived in the Hartsville-Jackson International Airport this morning, having wrapped up a seven-day visit to Buenos Aires, Argentina, he said. Sanford said he had not been hiking along the Appalachian Trail, as his staff said in a Tuesday statement to the media.
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
8:44 am
Well I guess if you can’t find something positive to say about your guy in office now, all’s that’s left is to bash Bush…..Again. Why stop there? If Bush left such a mess for Obama to clean up surely if was because Bush was so busy trying to clean up Clinton’s mess?
Sam
June 24th, 2009
8:44 am
Bush spending like a drunken sailor, have you paid attention to Obozo lately….Geeesh!!
Normal
June 24th, 2009
8:44 am
Whiner- your 8:38: Nice wiggle…close, but no cigar, Brutus…Just sayin’
AJC Sucks
June 24th, 2009
8:45 am
Jay,
Do ya’ll actually write anything news worthy at the AJC? I mean, really? You don’t have an opinion on anything else important that may be going on? I mean, the AJC gets all there news from twitter & other web sites. Why not do something original?
King Curious George (Jugo Obama)
June 24th, 2009
8:46 am
Articles like this are why newspapers are going bankrupt all over the country.
Funny how talk radio is flourishing though.
Go ahead and keep dwelling on mean old George W. Bush. There is not too much positive to say about our current president. His only accomplishment is the fact that he is black.
AJC and all newspapers going out of business, talk radio flourishing. Have to love it.
mike
June 24th, 2009
8:49 am
Well considering that Obama’s foreign policy changes are cosmetic at best, Jay must also have a low opinion of Obama too.
Oh wait. Obama is a Democrat, so the policy differences really don’t factor into Jay’s thinking.
Joey
June 24th, 2009
8:52 am
Jay: Very impressive.
We are so fortunate that you choose to share with us the clear picture that you bring into focus when you turn your penetrating, and unbiased, vision onto the subject of George Bush. What is it, 9 years now?
Furtunate indeed?
Wingnut Denier
June 24th, 2009
8:53 am
JAY U R A HACK!!!
LIBRAZL SUKK!
TEH AJC BURNS IN PAGEN H3LL!
GEORGE W. BUSH — BEST PREZNIT EVER!!!1!!!elevens!!!!!
Just Released
June 24th, 2009
8:53 am
Some documents from the Nixon administration that were just released give us some new insight into the mindset of another past president, for what good it does.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
8:53 am
Ever notice how the pro bushies have only sarcasm and insults to use to defend Grorgie? And, oh yeah, let’s not forget to throw out Bill Clinton, that will show us. They will also use President Obama’s spending and conveniently forget it wouldn’t have been necessary, if President George W. Bush would only have done his job!
catlady
June 24th, 2009
8:56 am
Am Vet: Depends on how many Presidents we end up having. He might rank higher than Calvin Coolidge.
HDB: Don’t forget NCLB and the generous business it rewarded his friends with.
I Report :-) You Whine :-(
June 24th, 2009
8:56 am
Let’s see here, our comparison chart includes Klintoon, Bushitler and Obozo.
Billy Bob- Reduced the grandeur, prestige and honor of the presidency and White House to the level of a drunken frat house party. Major military actions include bombing a nation and slaughtering it’s civilians from 50,000 feet that had not even threatened the United States and for good measures, took out the embassy of our number one adversary, why, for fun perhaps? Lost his law license for malfeasance, raped and pillaged every trailer park in between DC and ArKansas, paid huge million dollar settlement for a BJ, which from his time in history would forever be known as a Lewinsky.
Yeah, tell me about it.
Bushie- Instead of conducting and environmental impact study of the possible effects of attacking the Taliban in Afghanistan, as al-Gore would have ate up the decade doing, attacked the Taliban in Afghanistan. Removed from power a regional and worldwide menace, while at the same time giving freedom to the 25 million formerly enslaved citizens of Iraq, which now stands as a beacon of liberty and democracy from which the Iranian people have derived hope from seeing.
Launched one of the largest economic expansions in US history by cutting capital gains and personal tax rates, fueling a huge boom in construction, which provided the longest period of growth in US history until the democrats brought it all cashing down to earth by giving houses to people who couldn’t pay for them. This growth period was DESPITE two major hurricanes, a giant terrorist attack on the country and two wars fought simultaneously.
Not bad, eh?
Obozo, hahahahahahahaha, come on, be serious.
eewwwww
Billy Bob
June 24th, 2009
8:56 am
As I survey the Middle East today, I haven’t seen any sign of The Messiah’s changes. The president’s campaign slogan must have been casually spawned while musing the daily rotation of his BVD’s on a trip to the Middle East. OK, I get it now. Change, periodically. Brilliant.
‘cept for the abject bowing, bending-over, grovelling and the lack of any end game, Obama’s change is wa-a-a-a-a-a-y better than Bush [sarc]. I mean, heck, he shuffled the pieces on the ME board game and thought presto, OBL will be caught, Iran de-nuked, Afghanistan stablized. Uh, well, almost.
And lawd knows, we don’t want to compare Cheney with Joe Biden. Best to keep people’s attention on the previous VP rather than the current one.
Change you can believe in.
thomas
June 24th, 2009
8:57 am
great history lesson Jay,
Nothing going on in world, or our country.
Unemployment of 10% looming,
A plan for a missle to be launched at one of our states.
Little disturbance in Iran
Still in 2 wars
Health plan est. to cost 1.6 billion
Poll numbers against stimulus package
Jobs not being created.
But I guess none of those fall into the agenda of you Mr. Bookman. Does your credibility mean nothing to you? That answer is obvious for any who have been reading your stuff for a while now.
Seriously what type of an odd alter do you have to bush? All that is currently going on and it has been at least 5 pieces from you since you spoke of anything of actual importance.
Do you think President Obama even cares that you are a stooge for him? Most likely not.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
8:57 am
Sam
June 24th, 2009
8:44 am
Bush spending like a drunken sailor, have you paid attention to Obozo lately….Geeesh!!
—————–
Sam if this is all you can find to pick on, then you must think that the rest of my post is true. Is that it?
Kamchak
June 24th, 2009
8:58 am
“…because Bush was so busy trying to clean up Clinton’s mess?”
Low unemployment, projected budget surplus, gasoline under a dollar a gallon…I agree that Bush definitely solved these “problems.”
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
8:59 am
Bad staff! Bad, Bad Staff! Shame on you for not telling the poor media details that were none of their business to begin with. Bad Staff! What do you think this is? The AJC?
Vinny
June 24th, 2009
9:01 am
Typical -
His boy in the White House is doing such a terrible job that Jay has to attempt to create a diversion by revisiting the past.
Remember what Barry said Jay? “We Won”. This economy and record debt and deficit that he has created is all Obama’s. He is determined to bring this country to ruin.
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
9:03 am
Jay do you remember when Bush was first elected and you tried to explain the mistake the country had just made? How you tried to explain what needed to be done to stop the Republicans, who held both the executive branch and legislative would become obsessed with their own power and bring this country down?
Do you remember how the partisan republicans and conservatives (not always the same thing) kept going “OOoohh that Clinton!” over and over? Remember how they remained blind to what was going on and just focused that hate on Clinton? How whenever you brought anything up it was “but Clinton?”
I do. I never liked W. I hated the fact that he had a republican congress and executive and there were no checks on our government and legislation was passed without thoughtful review. I was ashamed that W did not lift his veto pen for 6 years. Pork ran rampant and spending increased.
Now, things are the same. I do not like our president and hate the fact that the congress is also democratic, so there are no checks on their power and they are passing legislation without any thoughtful review. I try to explain to people that we need checks on power and our country will be bankrupt in a flurry of spending and pork and ridiculous taxes like cap and trade when NASA tells us we are cooling. Obama’s veto pen is starting to get dusty.
But what happens now? I am stuck with a bunch of partisan democrats and liberals (not always the same thing) who respond to any attempt at thoughtful discussion with “OOOoohh that Bush!” And when I try to discuss the ludicrous things going on in Washington all I get is “But Bush . . .”
Thanks for throwing fuel on the fire Jay. Use that old Republican strategy of keeping focus away from what’s actually going on by feeding on hate for the old administration. We’ll all go down together, see you at the bottom.
On the presidents scale recently
worst: Obama
2nd worst, by a hair: Bush
Looking better all the time: Clinton
lovelyliz
June 24th, 2009
9:03 am
Believing in you divine right to be right about quite often leads you to be wrong. The human race has free will for a reason. Unfortunately,, too many in the Bush adminstratin just couldn’t grasp the concept that their divine providence could be off.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:04 am
Jay –
you’re forgetting – CHENEY CHOSE HIMSELF!!! He headed up the Veep search … and after poring through loads of resumes and conducting countless interviews, he decided that the BEST person to serve as Veep was … HIMSELF.
oh, yeah, the puppetmaster was at work from Day 1
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
9:05 am
Bush didn’t choose Cheney to be his running mate – Cheney chose himself. He was on the VP selection committee, and he just decided the best VP choice was him! Cheney knew he could never be the President, so he settled for the next best thing – the President’s puppetmaster.
Dick Cheney = Evil
godless heathen
June 24th, 2009
9:05 am
Bush must have done a lot right to get the libs to hate him so much.
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
9:06 am
Gasoline under a dollar a gallon? When? Where? Damn I’m getting old cuz I don’t remember the last time gas was under a dollar a gallon.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
9:06 am
USinUK (your name is hard to type),
As DB told me the other day when we had a similar thing happen – “Get out of my head!”
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:07 am
Bosch -
““Get out of my head!””
I prefer “Great minds think alike”
Gandalf, the White! (!)
June 24th, 2009
9:07 am
Jay, you are moonbat! How goes the job search?
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
9:08 am
Doesn’t somebody owe a coke?
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
9:09 am
USinUK,
Yeah, that’s better.
The other sounds sort of mean.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:10 am
“Bush must have done a lot right to get the libs to hate him so much”
well, gee … there was stealing an election in 2000 … then reversing the environmental rules … then enforcing the global gag rule … then ignoring the “Osama wants to attack the US memo” (complete with the lovely quote “well, now you’ve covered your butt”) … then there was the manipulation of 9/11 into an unnecessary war in Iraq … I’d go on, but my blood pressure is going up …
if you want to call all of that “right” … then it must be interesting in your world where the clock strikes thirteen and we’ve always been at war with East Asia …
Normal
June 24th, 2009
9:11 am
USinUk, you are right about Cheney, of course, but George W. wore the title of President of the United States of America. “Puppet” doesn’t even begin to describe it. The last administration should be considered an insult by all of the people of this country, some just don’t get it.
jconservative
June 24th, 2009
9:11 am
Good point re Cheney & Rumsfeld & their influence on Bush. If you recall, after Bush, Cheney was the most visible person in the administration. After Bush canned Rumsfeld Cheney became almost invisible.
Reports from WH insiders say Cheney & Bush had a real hard argument over Rumsfeld that got way to personal. Rumsfeld was Cheney’s man & he took the dismissal personally.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:11 am
whocares – I think one of us has to yell “JINX!!! youowemeacoke!”
Turd Ferguson
June 24th, 2009
9:12 am
As long as the libs/democrats/socialists can continue a negative diatrabe regarding “W” they are able to deflect the failings and fence-sittings of Barrys current administration.
Butt thats ok kids…Barry’s honeymoon will shortly be over.
Stay tuned as Barry begins backtracking and bailing water. Should be fun!!
Fred
June 24th, 2009
9:12 am
Man,
I know ms. gawdzilla, copyleft, and byteme are superficial morons but this whine guy is a complete retard.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:13 am
Normal –
I’m just trying to block out the last 8 years (much in the same way I have mostly blocked out the 2 years I lived in hartford … eeeesh)
Doggone/GA
June 24th, 2009
9:14 am
“Again Jay, this is newsworthy?”
In case you didn’t notice…this is an OPINION page, not a NEWS page.
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
9:14 am
No Jay, history will tell how the media (you, luckovich, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, NYT, Wash. Post, Newsweek, etc…) lied, attacked, and undermined everything thing he did, instead of report the facts.
How the liars like Obama, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, Waters, gosh the democrats have so many, had one agenda, appose Bush and any and every level.
Oh yeah, and boy don’t we have a real genius in Joe Biden. I know the USA is still waiting on those “three letter word, J-O-B-S” to get created.
Umm didn’t Obama say unemployment wouldn’t reach 9% if we pass that spending bill that was about a foot high in length? It was so urgent to pass, he went to Chicago for a three day weekend and signed it on a Tue.
Last score I heard was 9.4%. Since our messiah as been in office it’s jobs lost 2 million, saved or created, 150,000.
Let’s just hope we can survive for another 3.5 years.
The way we weren't
June 24th, 2009
9:15 am
These right wing apologists on here are really pathetic. In one “breath” they proclaim that all we need to do is wait ten or more years to bear the fruit of the GeeWhiz legacy (if it is anything like the rotted fruit we’re getting from Bonzo’s sidekick, Ronnie, we’re doomed…) and in the next “breath”, they ask what Obama is waiting for.
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
9:15 am
Few loose ends about…
CHENEY CHOSE HIMSELF!!! He headed up the Veep search … and after poring through loads of resumes and conducting countless interviews, he decided that the BEST person to serve as Veep was … HIMSELF.
I’m going to guess Jay knew this already and figured it’d be larding up a concise post with a distraction.
(Also, you’re going to have to tell us what was so all-fired bad about Hartford sometime. But I digress.)
USinUK (your name is hard to type),
So is “YouzeinYook” but I prefer to type what I hear in my head.
Bush must have done a lot right to get the libs to hate him so much.
Keep focusing on that all-important “p!ss off liberals” Conservative First Directive. It’s worked so well for you guys of late.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:15 am
TF –
awww … you seem to think that we’re alike, the left and right. see, here are the 2 key differences:
1) the folks on the left don’t see criticism of the president as TREASON – we see it as a responsibility.
2) unlike the folks on the right and their treatment of W as the Messiah, we HAVE criticized our president for letting us down with things like DADT policy, secrecy, etc
Mrs. Godzilla
June 24th, 2009
9:16 am
Turd Lemonade…..tehee tehetehe
USA all the Way
June 24th, 2009
9:17 am
What’s the matter Bookman…your guy sucks and is screwing the country so you you need to deflect attention and go back and write an article on Bush to focus away from Osama (yes, that’s correct) and his crappy administration. You are just old news! Move on!
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
9:18 am
I guess I’m just ignernt cuz I never paid too much attention to Cheney. But if it’s true that the Veeps have that kind of influence over the President it’s a wonder we ain’t all dead. I mean c’mon? Mondale, Gore, Spiro Agnew!
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:19 am
Gwinecian –
““YouzeinYook”” – ooooo … I like that …
Hartford. where to begin. first there’s the weather – I mean, snow starting in November straight through until March-ish. And cold. ohmygod. My first full winter up there, we had an entire month where the high didn’t break above freezing. that’s just not right.
and the people just don’t want to know you unless they have to. cold. taciturn. not chatty, friendly folks like you get below the M-D.
but the autumns were pretty.
Tom
June 24th, 2009
9:20 am
Accurate enough, Jay. However, BushDrunk’s entire history is one of unintelligence, incompetence, phony, childish machismo, heavy drinking
(I’m talking back in high school and forward.), swaggering abouit, running his would-be tough guy mouth. Many books by his peers are out there, available, and detailed. He was incompetent at most everything, including 5 different shots at Grandpa’s/Daddy’s businesses. Buying the governorship while constantly mumbling about a “war with Iraq” before even that. Lots of insight into this cretin, but the Little People always refuse to educate themselves w such available history. He is a weak person – in every sense of that word’s meaning.
AmVet
June 24th, 2009
9:20 am
On the surface this perceived Bush-bashing serves little purpose. And after months of personally excoriating him and his abysmal record, I chose forge ahead after January 20, 2009.
But as the more devout of us Hebes say regarding the holocaust, “Never forget”.
It highlights how those who voted for that awful administration – most twice – have cast their lot with the greatest modern day failure in US history.
Some – those who have left the once Grand Old Party or who at least rue enabling these deadly crooks – have learned their lesson, it would seem.
But those that defiantly, and in the face of 30 year old mountains of irrefutable evidence, remain on the lunatic fringe as apologists and deniers, are infinitely more interesting.
Clinging desperately to their angry god and their loaded guns, they are the very face of disregarded fanaticism, unrequited bloodlust, intellectual poverty, moral pettiness and political bankruptcy.
My advice is simple:
Step One – Admit you are powerless over Bushitis and that your lives had become unmanageable.
Move on to Step Two…
ty webb
June 24th, 2009
9:24 am
oh, thanks for clearing that up. I thought that the left only viewed criticism of the president as racism.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
9:24 am
Lots of points, there.
I’ve maintained that, from his perspective as a Congressman, then as a member of the Executive, VP Cheney came in to service with Pres Bush, in part, to strengthen what he saw as the rights and perquisites of the Executive. Did the pendulum swing a bit far? It usually does.
And now, in several areas, the Obama Administration is continuing the policies championed by VP Cheney. One of the most ironic to Cheney detractors: all the angst over secret energy meetings with oil executives? What was the source of suit against the Obama Administration’s secrecy in who they met with? Yup – secret energy meetings with coal executives!
I’m trying, Mrs. G… I really am….
The Libby thing: I realize this will directly contradict the “Bush is a liar to his core” crowd, Bush commuted the jail sentence but left standing the conviction for obstruction and lying to a federal investigator. Bush answered this:
[["I respect the jury's verdict," Bush said, he had concluded that the prison sentence was excessive. Bush's statement also noted that those who defended the prosecution of Libby "argue, correctly, that our entire system of justice relies on people telling the truth. And if a person does not tell the truth, particularly if he serves in government and holds the public trust, he must be held accountable."]]
Those who view Bush as a liar won’t buy it and will probably default to the Cheney speculation. That’s easier, I suppose, than reconsidering one’s assumptions.
Plame was touched on. The drama may finally be over.
[[The Supreme Court will not revive a lawsuit that former CIA operative Valerie Plame brought against former members of the Bush administration.
The court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
A lower court last year threw out the lawsuit in which Plame and Wilson accused former Vice President Dick Cheney and several former high-ranking administration officials of revealing her identity to reporters in 2003. Plame and Wilson said that violated their constitutional rights...
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said that Plame and Wilson did not meet the legal standard for constitutional claims...
The leak touched off a lengthy investigation that resulted in Libby's conviction for obstruction and lying to investigators. Jurors found that he told reporters about Plame and lied about it to the FBI and a federal grand jury...
Nobody was ever charged with the leak itself...]]
Some people should just accept when their fifteen minutes of fame are over.
And the Democratic Congress //still// hasn’t amended the law to prevent this from happening again. I guess they know, unlike Plame, when the 15 minutes of political theater are over.
Turd Ferguson
June 24th, 2009
9:25 am
War with Iraq wrong blah blah blah…did you harvard educated idiots ever realize we have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan? These two countries border or foe Iran. Nuff said.
Chris
June 24th, 2009
9:26 am
Right on Ramble On! Yes, Bookman we certainly will see what history has to say. Will you also be telling us why liberal newspapers failed?
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:28 am
TF –
yeah. and we see how well that’s worked out over the last 5 years.
sd
June 24th, 2009
9:30 am
The one problem with your argument, Jay, is that you assert that Bush “choose” Cheney.
Bush was chosen by the Project for a New American Century, of which, Cheney was a ranking member.
jewcowboy
June 24th, 2009
9:30 am
Tank,
You put Hilton in the same arena as unemployment and Iran?
Now I really know what is wrong with Republicans. They are easily distracted by shiney objects.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:31 am
“easily distracted by shiney objects”
hey! that’s usually my line!!!
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
9:33 am
Turd, jeez, usually when someone’s outed as a liar they have the decency to at least change nyms and/or lie low for awhile.
If you’re going to hang around here, you’re going to need to explain why you claimed to be an Obama voter last week. Else get used to being referred to as “Turd Lemonade”, along with the requisite explanation for why you’ve been pegged as such by n00bs.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
9:34 am
USinUK
G’morning. Or afternoon, as the case may be. Don’t know if you saw it the other day, but
Plaice. Outstanding.
Northern Songs Ltd
June 24th, 2009
9:35 am
The longer I read this blog, the more I am convinced Whiner is really the less inteligent, second cousin to Redneck Convert.
But really Jay, can’t we just let this go? ‘W’ is gone, and history will be the judge. We are all still way too close to the stink to be truly objective.
Doggone/GA
June 24th, 2009
9:36 am
“Bush was chosen by the Project for a New American Century, of which, Cheney was a ranking member.”
And of course they FORCED Bush to accept him as VP, right? Interesting how easily he gave up the power to choose his VP, isn’t it?
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:36 am
Paul –
I did see your plaice comment – and, yes. it is truly yummilicious.
frankly, I think it’s funny that the UK has such a bad rep for food … while I’m not a big fan of steamed puddings with suet, no one does really good stick-to-your-ribs food like the Brits. and they do some killer desserts, as well. and, of course, you can’t go wrong when your national dish is curry!!
Turd Ferguson
June 24th, 2009
9:37 am
LOL…Not goona splain a thing…LOL. Just behaving like your double-talking leader…I guess.
Lefty Lemonade
June 24th, 2009
9:38 am
BBBUUUWWWWWAAAAAHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Kamchak
June 24th, 2009
9:38 am
http://gawker.com/5301828/dick-cheney-gets-a-book-deal
The bunker diaries.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
9:40 am
USA all the way…NOT, you are only USA half way. President Obama is your President now, so prove yourself and get behind him and offer him helpful criticism if you can, or go play with your Cheney…Just sayin’
sd
June 24th, 2009
9:41 am
“And of course they FORCED Bush to accept him as VP, right? Interesting how easily he gave up the power to choose his VP, isn’t it?”
A good salesman (Rove) can convince a person to buy something and further convince the person that the idea to buy that something was the buyer’s in the first place.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
9:43 am
Paul,
“secret energy meetings with coal executives”
What ‘cho talkin’ ’bout Paul? Splain.
And if we go to war with West Virginia after these meetings, then I’ll be very concerned.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
9:44 am
Kamchak,
2:30! Right? Exciting!!!
Paul
June 24th, 2009
9:44 am
USinUK
Enjoy the plaice while you can. When you leave, that’s it.
Agree about the Indian food. I learned early on, never, ever look in the kitchen! Just enjoy the food.
Used to be a restaurant on, I think the north side of Leicester Square. An extension, I believe, of the Swiss (?) Embassy. Heavily subsidized, actually three restaurants, inexpensive to expensive, go in the door and split off to the one you want. Sorry I can’t remember the name but it was right on the Square. The creamed spinach was memorable. Nutmeg. I almost have it replicated.
mm
June 24th, 2009
9:45 am
Why do the wingnuts always attack a democrat for using our military but cheer on a republican for doing it?
Obama must be doing something right because he is driving the wingnuts crazy.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
9:45 am
USinUK, I used to live in Groton for four years. Worked for Electric Boat in R&D. Loved the job, hated the snow. The damnyankees up there always asked me why a southern boy would come up there to work. I’d always look around, then whisper “sssh, don’t tell anybody, but I’m up here to learn how to make submarines for the Confederacy. Most believed me, Brain freeze, I guess…
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
9:45 am
Normal…you want us to get behind and support Obama just like you were behind and supported Bush? LOL that’s hilarious…Just sayin’
DHD
June 24th, 2009
9:46 am
Obama makes Bush look good.
Doggone/GA
June 24th, 2009
9:46 am
“But really Jay, can’t we just let this go?”
No, we can’t. We’re going to be dealing with, and living under, the “results” of the decisions made during his reign for a LONG time.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
9:47 am
Bosch
In answer to your 9:43 (sorry for the long cite, Jay, someday, I promise, I’ll get the link thing down)
Michael Isikoff
NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated Jun 29, 2009
As a senator, Barack Obama denounced the Bush administration for holding “secret energy meetings” with oil executives at the White House. But last week public-interest groups were dismayed when his own administration rejected a Freedom of Information Act request for Secret Service logs showing the identities of coal executives who had visited the White House to discuss Obama’s “clean coal” policies. One reason: the disclosure of such records might impinge on privileged “presidential communications.” The refusal, approved by White House counsel Greg Craig’s office, is the latest in a series of cases in which Obama officials have opted against public disclosure. Since Obama pledged on his first day in office to usher in a “new era” of openness, “nothing has changed,” says David -Sobel, a lawyer who litigates FOIA cases. “For a president who said he was going to bring unprecedented transparency to government, you would certainly expect more than the recycling of old Bush secrecy policies.”
The hard line appears to be no accident. After Obama’s much-publicized Jan. 21 “transparency” memo, administration lawyers crafted a key directive implementing the new policy that contained a major loophole, according to FOIA experts. The directive, signed by Attorney General Eric Holder, instructed federal agencies to adopt a “presumption” of disclosure for FOIA requests. This reversal of Bush policy was intended to restore a standard set by President Clinton’s attorney general, Janet Reno. But in a little-noticed passage, the Holder memo also said the new standard applies “if practicable” for cases involving “pending litigation.” Dan Metcalfe, the former longtime chief of FOIA policy at Justice, says the passage and other “lawyerly hedges” means the Holder memo is now “astonishingly weaker” than the Reno policy. (The visitor-log request falls in this category because of a pending Bush-era lawsuit for such records.)
Administration officials say the Holder memo was drafted by senior Justice lawyers in consultation with Craig’s office. The separate standard for “pending” lawsuits was inserted because of the “burden” it would impose on officials to go “backward” and reprocess hundreds of old cases, says Melanie Ann Pustay, who now heads the FOIA office. White House spokesman Ben LaBolt says Obama “has backed up his promise” with actions including the broadcast of White House meetings on the Web. (Others cite the release of the so-called torture memos.) As for the visitor logs, LaBolt says the policy is now “under review.”
URL: http://www.newsweek.com/id/202875
Jay
June 24th, 2009
9:47 am
It’s fascinating: Bringing up George Bush, who has been out of office for all of five months now, is criticized as dredging up ancient history.
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton and even Jimmy Carter remain fair game.
Funny how that works.
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
9:49 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlyr2pNMbT4&feature=related
Gosh that’s only the tip of the iceberg. What a genius!!!!
Trudy
June 24th, 2009
9:50 am
GOP = Hypocrisy
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:50 am
Normal – “submarines for the Confederacy” HA!!! that’s the funniest thing I’ve read today!! the autumns were gorgeous, but they HAD to be to make up for the winter. but the people. my god, what a miserable lot.
Paul – gah. Leiscester Square – too dang many tourists. there are other great places for food without having to venture anywhere near the tourist hotspots. (and, as for not looking in the kitchen – that’s something I believe in for most restaurants that aren’t 5-star)
Peadawg – MOST of the country WAS behind Bush, you peabrain. Right up until he drove us off a cliff and into Iraq.
Kamchak
June 24th, 2009
9:51 am
Bosch
Yes, I’ll be watchin’. Are you following the story of the Iranian players that were “retired” because of their green arm bands? Didn’t someone say something about politics and futbol?
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:51 am
Jay –
TESTIFY to your 9:47!!!
Normal
June 24th, 2009
9:51 am
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
9:45 am
Normal…you want us to get behind and support Obama just like you were behind and supported Bush? LOL that’s hilarious…Just sayin’
————————-
I supported him with all I could give him up until 911. Almost forgave him then, but he had to go and do Iraq. I tried. Are you trying? Just askin’…
@@
June 24th, 2009
9:52 am
Join Obama, jay….”turn the page”!
A “new” history is in the making and it looks very much like that of the Bush/Cheney administration.
Damn! do you ever tire of living in the present/past?
Doggone/GA
June 24th, 2009
9:52 am
“you want us to get behind and support Obama just like you were behind and supported Bush?”
Bush had all the support he could ever hope for after 911. He blew it.
Jay
June 24th, 2009
9:52 am
And for AtlantaNative and others, if you care to go back and look, I didn’t become strongly critical of Bush until the decision to invade Iraq, followed by the ineptness of the occupation and the administration’s refusal to talk straight to the American people.
I understand that thought conflicts with the image of reality that many of you need to get you through the day, but that’s OK. It’s true nonetheless.
Brad Steel
June 24th, 2009
9:52 am
Cheney/Satin 2012
Paul
June 24th, 2009
9:53 am
Jay 9:47
[[Funny how that works.]]
It’s a partisan kinda thing –
But I wonder if the view of ‘ancient’ has to do with the age of the poster?
Later -
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
9:53 am
mm,
It might be that the democratic presidents use our military more than Republicans.
WWI – Wilson D
WWII – Roosevelt – D
Korea – Truman – D
Viet Nam – Kennedy – D
Tonkin Bay Resolution – Johnson – D
Grenada – Reagan – R
Kuwait – Bush I – R
Afghanistan – Bush II – R Up the ante Obama – D
Iraq – Bush II – R
Not a judgment call, just statistics.
I guess my earlier post was not partisan enough to draw a response. Or is it that ya’ll have no defense? Jay has none.
Iraq
George American
June 24th, 2009
9:54 am
History, not some 2nd rate “book” or the liberal drive-by media, will show that Bush and Cheney were one of the most successful teams in history.
Icon
June 24th, 2009
9:56 am
Here you go whiner. A short list of why we’ll be paying for W’s incompetence and epic failure for 20 years or more:
Contractors Failing Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan
No Child Left Behind a Complete Failure. Standards lowered.
Student Loan Scandal.
Katrina: FEMA trailers with Formaldehyde
Katrina: Complete Failure to provide assistance during Katrina
Katrina: Flood Protection a joke.
Katrina: New Orleans still in trouble years later.
No Sustainable energy policy other than bomb Iraq
Foreign Oil Dependence has Grown
No planning on Refinery Bottleneck still squeezes supply
No work on modernizing our electrical grid
Climate Chante: Hide and edit the assessments
No advance of Climate Change policy
Science Policy Politicized
Mountaintop Coal Mining alters Appalachia
EPA misleads on Air Quality after 9/11
TARP: Wrote blank check to banks, no oversight, no one kept track of where the money went
Skyrocketing Deficit.
No oversight on Credit Default Swaps and bank leveraging asset ratios
Lax oversight on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
SEC allowed Investment Banks to to go unregulated
More corps pay less taxes
Audit rates for the rich fall, audits of poor spike
US companies hiding revenues offshore
Mismanagement and Cronyism at HUD
Medicare Fraud completely out of control
50 million Americans without health insurance
Torture
CIA renditions
Politicization of Department of Justice
Arbitray detention at Guantanamo
No immigration reform
30 Billion dollar Virtual fence a failure
First responders STILL cannot communicate with each other in case of disaster
FBI abuses power to obtain citizen information
Agencies failed to share intelligence on 9/11 terrorists
Pakistan remains Al Qaeda Haven
FBI failure to create a modern secure computer network
Terrorist watch list mismanged
Lack of due process for terrorism suspects
US guns arming mexican caztels
Utterly false premise for going to war
Abu Ghraib
Poor health care for Vets
Blackwater
Military failure to secure Iraq after invasion, looting.
Lack of armored protection for troops
Incompetent planning for post-invasion Iraq
Loss of Billions in cash in Iraq
Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan
190,000 missing weapons in Iraq
Failure to modernize Air Traffic Control
FAA in the dark on airline maintenance issues
Record delays in air travel
FAA inspectors in bed with airlines
Abuse of Executive Power
Excessive Executive Secrecy
Signing statements used to thwart laws
Vice President’s Office exempts itself from Information safeguards (laws)
Executive Office of the President “Loses” E-mails
Harriot Myers
Alberto Gonzalez
Seriously, Whiner, get a clue before you hurt someone.
Northern Songs Ltd
June 24th, 2009
9:56 am
DB and Mrs G: I actually prefer “Lemon Turd”.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:56 am
wow … cheney is running with satin???
is that like Obama is a muslin?
Copyleft
June 24th, 2009
9:57 am
I’d agree that Bush made a serious mistake in naming Cheney as his running mate… but he went into it with his eyes open.
Remember, Bush FILLED his administration with proven traitors to American, i.e., signatories to the PNAC document. Cheney was just one of many.
Shawny
June 24th, 2009
9:57 am
While dredging up Bush isn’t ancient history, it is history. Let it go already. And BTW, you made so many statements that can not be confirmed or denied that it makes this topic ridiculous.
“he was nominally the guy in charge”. You don’t know that – conjecture
“once Rumsfeld — Cheney’s guy — was gone from the Pentagon, Cheney’s influence waned”. You don’t know that – conjecture
“Bush realized in the summer of 2005 that he had been misled by Cheney and his minions about their role in the Valerie Plame episode.”. You don’t know that – conjecture
“but I suspect that incident opened Bush’s eyes to what had been happening in his own White House, and broke whatever trust remained with his vice president”. Admitted conjecture.
Quite making up stuff and stick to the facts. And while you are at it, let’s discuss how we are going to finance all of the CURRENT proposed govt spending.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
9:58 am
and Jay – you are full of P&V today — you just go!!
Brad Steel
June 24th, 2009
9:59 am
Nice analysis of military policy AtlantaNative (idiot). Your analysis is unassailable and shows absolute positive proof.
And a chilly day in May proves that there is no global warming too. I smoked a cigarette once and I don’t have cancer – proof positive.
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
10:00 am
Oops, I’m wrong. Jay did respond. I apologize, Jay. But that doesn’t change the fact that you are doing the same thing that the GOP hacks did when Bush was starting out.
Regardless of how you frame your opinions from then, the point rings true. Whenever one party has control of both executive and legislative, the American people suffer and hacks supporting the party in power focus on the past administration to avoid the morass facing them. It’s not a Dem or GOP thing, it is a blind partisan thing.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:00 am
George American…Bless your heart…Just sayin’
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:01 am
Atlanta “History is not my strong suit” Native –
WWI – Wilson D — we were attacked
WWII – Roosevelt – D — we were attacked
Korea – Truman – D — we were fighting communism
Viet Nam – Kennedy – D — we were obligated due to treaties
Tonkin Bay Resolution – Johnson – D — you’re actually separating this out from VN???
Grenada – Reagan – R (oh, yeah, THERE was a war we needed to get into)
Kuwait – Bush I – R (an ally was invaded)
Afghanistan – Bush II – R Up the ante Obama – D (harbored terrorists that attacked us)
Iraq – Bush II – R (tried to kill his daddy)
A BUSH FAN
June 24th, 2009
10:08 am
Jay…….Need to stick to what you do best….Write JOKES for the 50-percent unEmployed of Atlanta.
getalife
June 24th, 2009
10:08 am
Funny how cons still cling to the lies of the worst ever and attack a man trying to put out all his fires.
Party over country. Failed Americans.
Anyhoo, our friends across the pond tried to have a private inquiry on the lost Iraq war.
It will be public and they are not moving on.
Nobody reads long posts
June 24th, 2009
10:12 am
Jay Bookman refers to Cheney as “a bit of a nut,” and every day Biden opens a gallon can of nuts and worms for Obama’s snacking enjoyment. The Bookmans of the world can’t sell papers, because the Obama supporters don’t read the news. It’s too, like, depressing, so they, like, just listen to, like, their BFFs for the tune to sing next.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:13 am
hey getalife
Was Jungmann great, or what? Only a freshman. Jindal and Perry have a bet. I wish Texas could win but Perry would lose.
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
10:15 am
If I recall Carter and Clinton both tried to use the military but things didn’t turn out too well for us.
I Report :-) You Whine :-(
June 24th, 2009
10:16 am
Back when the housing mania was taking off, Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank famously said he wanted Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to “roll the dice” in the name of affordable housing. That didn’t turn out so well, but Mr. Frank has since only accumulated more power. And now he is returning to the scene of the calamity — with your money. He and New York Representative Anthony Weiner have sent a letter to the heads of Fannie and Freddie exhorting them to lower lending standards for condo buyers. -Wall Street Journal
It’s Bushie’s fault, blaaaaaaahhhhh!
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
10:17 am
I’m kinda glad things turned to the whole kneejerk “Oh, like you libs supported BUSH?” conversation-stopper-thingie I hear a lot from conservatives because I’ve wanted to get seriously personal about this whole issue of who-supported-whom-when for a while. Here goes.
Was I angry about FL in 2000? Hell yeah. Every bit as much the next Gore voter. But Gore had made a gracious speech and said of contesting the election, “It’s time for me to go”– and that went a very long way toward me giving Bush a very serious break.
I was told to get over the election and I really tried to move on. I actually saw some merit in the legislative wheeling and dealing Bush attempted pre-9/11, specifically his efforts to tie domestic oil drilling to raising CAFE standards.
(And hell, NCLB?–even Cynthia McKinney supported that!)
Bush’s approval ratings immediately after 9/11 weren’t in the stratosphere for nothing. We really were united behind him. I would’ve gone anywhere, done anything to get the fanatical SOBs that had attacked MY city. I took that attack about as personally as anyone, since that’s the metro area I’d called home most of life prior to moving to GA.
And yeah, I actually supported invading Iraq. I was one of those sad blue-dog/DLC types who actually thought Joe Lieberman wasn’t a total dick; what can I say.
Conservatives, I think, like to believe that people like me wound up turning against Bush as vehemently as we did because it was fashionable, because we do as we’re told, yadda yadda. All I can do is speak for myself and say plainly that breaking away from the New Republic, centrist Democrat mind-set, recognizing that Iraq was an abject failure and that we had been had and should’ve known better, that was fracking painful.
Fact was, though, that Bush got a more or less free ride from me for a good solid two-plus years into his term. And I ask nothing more than that of my principled conservative brethren.
And yeah, I know that there are plenty who do, actually–they just don’t generally post here, is all.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:19 am
Getalife…Give the CONs a break…When you’ve been in a coma for eight years, and suddenly come to and face reality…well, it must be a shock, don’t cha know…
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:20 am
whocares – as for Clinton’s use of the military, I think the people of Bosnia would disagree with your assessment
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
10:20 am
US in UK – did you notice that I said it was not a judgment call?????? Don’t tell me I do not know about history just because you think you disagree with me based on some preconceived notions you have about me.
I added Grenada in order to not be yelled at for leaving it out. Stupid and pointless that war was (Yoda speak)
I separated the Tonkin Bay Resolution because it became a whole new war then. If you would like to discuss the troops and strategy differences that lead to my separation, that might be fun. I like to look back to the decade the French spent there when I analyze US policy in Viet Nam.
If you want to debate the Korean War and the fight against communism that worked so well there and in Viet Nam, I guess we could . . . . .
As for Iraq II being revenge for trying to kill Bush’s daddy, I could not agree more. If you want to discuss the Powell doctrine v. the Rumsfeld stupidity, we could do that too.
On WWI and us being attacked – we should have hit Saudi Arabia in 2001 since the Lusitania was nowhere near as adversarial as 9/11, under that theory.
Just because you think you disagree with me does not make me ignorant.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:21 am
DB: Well said and from the heart…I like that…
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
10:22 am
Paul,
Oh that. Well, I don’t like the whole air of secrecy around that, I didn’t know it was coal executives he was meeting with. But, like I said, if we invade Australia or West Virginia, then it will raise a red flag with me.
Kamchak,
I heard about the green bands, but didn’t hear anything after that. They were “retired” like “you don’t play anymore?”
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:23 am
Atlanta Native –
then how about now setting it up as “seee!!! DEMS are worse war mongerers than the GOP!!! so there!!!”
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:24 am
“now” should have been NOT setting it up …
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
10:24 am
Argh, mis-wrote @ 10.17. Obviously I don’t expect anyone to give Obama a “free ride” (I certainly don’t) but rather something akin to the benefit of the doubt.
Mrs. Godzilla
June 24th, 2009
10:25 am
Lemon Turd Sings Northern Songs? Too funny
on a more serious note and OFF TOPIC
there was a “non-event” at the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Power Plant
in Baxley GA yesterday
Southern Co’s 883-megawatt Unit 2 at the Hatch nuclear power station in Georgia shut early Tuesday from 61 percent power due to high reactor water level, the company told the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a report. At the time of the shutdown, the unit was ramping up after exiting a June 20 outage due to a high reactor pressure scram signal. Operators were investigating the cause of the latest outage. The 1,752 MW Hatch station is located in Baxley in Appling County about 120 miles north of Jacksonville, Florida. It has two units, 876 MW Unit ( UNT – news – people ) 1 and the 883 MW Unit 2, which entered service in 1975 and 1979. The NRC extended the original 40 year licenses for both units in 2002 for another 20 years until 2034 and 2038. Unit 1 continued to operate at full power. One MW powers about 500 homes in Georgia. )
No mention of it in that damned liberal media
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:26 am
Report/Whine 10:16
Congressman Barney Frank is going back on O’Reilly tonight. Two-parter, I think.
Amazing. He goes on, they both go through their schtick, leftwing sites cut and paste and go on about it for days… then BOR invites him again and Frank is right back on.
Oh, this morning an anchor asked BOR ‘you gonna ask him about (getting some deal for a Boston company). BOR said ‘hey look, the guy’s a Congressman. It’s his job to preserve jobs in his district. If I was a Congressman I’d be doing the same thing.”
How could a neoconfascistRepublicanapologist say such a thing?!!?
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
10:27 am
“I supported him with all I could give him up until 911. Almost forgave him then, but he had to go and do Iraq. I tried. Are you trying? Just askin’…”
I was going to give Obama a change until he continued the spend spend spend spend spend mentality of Bush, which he said he would stop. Oh yeah, How’s the unemployment rate doing since he’s gotten in office…gone up or down? hmmmmmmm? just sayin’
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
10:28 am
Great post DB.
As for UK, I did not set it up like that, it’s just how you read it.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:28 am
Actually, “Lemon Turd” would be a great name for a grunge band…Just sayin’
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
10:31 am
“whocares – as for Clinton’s use of the military, I think the people of Bosnia would disagree with your assessment”
USinUK
I’ll give you that one, I forgot about that. I was referring to that little episode in Somolia.
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
10:31 am
chance*** not change.
sry for the typo
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
10:31 am
Icon, you left out the swine flu, Michael Phelps smoking pot, and Anna Nicole Smith (he drove’em both to drugs).
I think he was/is also a major reason the Braves haven’t been to the playoffs in a few years.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:32 am
Atlanta Native – “the democratic presidents use our military more than Republicans” … gee, don’t know why I would have “misread” your intention …
Peadawg … what part of “lagging indicator” do you not understand?
I Report :-) You Whine :-(
June 24th, 2009
10:33 am
Paul- I sincerely hope that O’Pinko calls Frank “mam” and not “senator.”
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:33 am
DB, Gwinnettian
You’re a complicated guy, you know that? Stereotypes are soooo much easier to deal with.
You said ‘frack.’ That bestows instant credibility.
Bosch
We ain’t gonna invade Australia. We like Hugh Jackman. And we ain’t gonna invade West Virginia, either. Robert Byrd has dumped gazillions in there to make tunnels and bunkers for military hardware just like Switzerland.
Obama and with the coal execs. Think they’re looking for any special tax breaks? Nawwwwwww.
I love irony.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:34 am
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
10:27 am
—————–
I’m sorry man, I thought you had a clue…President Obama inherited this. The economy was falling before he took office, as was the rest of it. As of now, I only question why the heck President Obama wanted the job in the first place…Just sayin…
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
10:34 am
Oops, I forgot Bosnia, too. It was a great success, in my opinion. Our image was on the way up in the world after Bosnia.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:35 am
whocares –
Somalia – tragic operation, that. but that was also because Papa Bush kinda-sorta got us involved without really having a clear goal other than trying to keep the peace. Everyone thinks that Clinton got us into it, but it was Papa Bush.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:37 am
I Report
You Whine
June 24th, 2009
10:33 am
——–
Bless your heart too…just sayin’
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:37 am
Bosnia. Lessee. Country does something we don’t like. Neighbors don’t act. US doesn’t act. US drags a military alliance in to impose its will. We’re still there years and years later.
Yup. Perfect model for imposing American cultural values.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:38 am
Make that “Neighbors don’t act. //UN// doesn’t act.”
Kamchak
June 24th, 2009
10:38 am
Bosch
Yeah “retired” like, you’re off the national team and we have revoked your passports. I understand that two of them play professionally in Germany.
booger
June 24th, 2009
10:39 am
I must have missed Jays columns on why Bill Clinton failed or why Jimmy Carter failed. I feel much better now.
For those who think Bush failed, if he did it was because the media decided he would. So far they have decided Obama will succeed. The media is journalism’s worst enemy.
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
10:40 am
USinUK,
Maybe so, but just like Johnson and Nixon took the rap for Vietnam, I’m afraid Clinton’s going to have to take it for Somolia
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
10:42 am
“Oops, I forgot Bosnia, too”
How does one just “forget” Bosnia? OMG.
Paul,
Special taxes? Probably so. Makes sense. Obama’s a politician first, Master of the Universe, second.
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
10:42 am
The people of Bosnia can thank an intern and a cigar for that freedom, or was that Hilary ducking sniper fire?
Doggone/GA
June 24th, 2009
10:43 am
“For those who think Bush failed, if he did it was because the media decided he would”
We sure have a POWERFUL MEDIA by golly!
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:44 am
Paul –
Bosnia wasn’t the UN – it was a NATO force – the US wasn’t and isn’t there alone. also, the reason we went in was not to “install democracy” (like it’s some kind of i-App), it was to STOP GENOCIDE.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
10:44 am
Kamchak,
Wow, didn’t know that. That pretty much sucks.
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
10:45 am
Jimmy Carter was a huge success, that’s why Obama is determined to out do him.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
10:45 am
“For those who think Bush failed, if he did it was because the media decided he would”
Damn. Where’s my monitor cleaning kit?
Atlanta Native
June 24th, 2009
10:46 am
UK can’t let it go can you? I know you think of me as a raging Republican out to paint Democrats as warmongers. I am not. I’m an independent who misses conservative democrats and liberal republicans. I miss a convention where a platform was hammered out instead pep rally where a candidate is anointed (not just the last election).
Me
June 24th, 2009
10:46 am
Jay,
Anything to say about what Obama is doing to prevent North Korea from sending missiles towards our country? How about the steps Obama is taking to encourage and promote democracy in Iran? Are you avoiding these issues because there is no defense for our President’s inaction?
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:47 am
Bosch
[[Obama’s a politician first, Master of the Universe, second.]]
Michelle as Meg Foster?
Told ya’ she can be scary -
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:47 am
“For those who think Bush failed, if he did it was because the media decided he would”
hahahaha … yeah. the media drove the economy into the ground. the media started spying on US citizens (without benefit of a warrant).
the media is to blame for the heartbreak of psoriasis, too.
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
10:47 am
Oh….and we also forgot blowing up Kadafee’s (sp) house when he wasn’t home. Who get’s the credit for that?
TnGelding
June 24th, 2009
10:47 am
Even more successful than the Gypper?
I’d say cutting the tax rate with so many pressing problems (SS, health care, energy, planned preemptive war(s)) would rank right up there as his biggest mistake. His mistake wasn’t picking Cheney, it was acquiescing to him for so long.
Heck, let’s just admit it, it was our mistake for allowing the election to be so close. But then if the biased, liberal media had done its job, it wouldn’t have been close. And then there was “that woman” with the stained blue dress.
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
10:48 am
Obama inherited it blah blah blah. WHAT HAS HE DONE TO HELP IT!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Doggone/GA
June 24th, 2009
10:48 am
“That pretty much sucks”
But it isn’t surprising.
The Baron
June 24th, 2009
10:49 am
Everything Jay says about the Bush legacy is correct. I always thought ‘W’ was a fine guy, someone to have a beer with (I still think so). I also thought he might have been a ‘harmless’ president if it werent for the diabolic influence of Dick Cheney, a man with a permanently dark world view!
Unfortunately for ‘W’, his administration was thus used to totally and finally discredit this largely unthinking, short-sighted and in many cases stupid neo-conservative philosophy. Somehow, Cheney hopes to salvage their image by positioning himself for instant recovery should the US be hit by a terrorist attack again. Luckily, the vast majority of Americans have smartened up since the tragic 8 years of ‘W’.
America deserves to be led by smart thinking, practical and pragmatic leaders, not ideologues who see themselves as ‘hammers’ and everything and everyone else as ‘nails’!
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:49 am
I think RAMBLE ON!!! is LEMON TURD…
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:49 am
Atlanta Native –
I miss the first part, too … don’t think the second part ever existed (sorry, but the “smoke-filled room” isn’t something that was created by Hollywood)
but, as I’ve said before – words mean something. if you don’t mean to frame your argument that Dems are more trigger-happy than the GOP, then don’t use those words.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:51 am
USinUK
I said the UN wouldn’t act so Pres Clinton pressed NATO into service. Of course we weren’t alone – any more than we were alone in Iraq (which some seem to think after they get the obligatory “except for the Brits” out of the way).
I didn’t say anything about installing democracy. I said to impose our cultural values. Which we did.
Yes, how one looks at genocide is a cultural value. See, we’ll invade another country if our sensibilities are offended. But we’ll condemn a pres for doing so if he’s not of our party.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:52 am
whocares — you’re right on the blame for Somalia – it’s a shame, but yeah, you’re right. (although, I think the blame was more a reflection on the “draft-dodger-as-commander-in-chief” narrative that the right was flinging like poo)
peadawg – take a deeeeeeep breath. we’ve been in a recession since December 2007. we didn’t GET here overnight. we’re not GETTING OUT overnight, either.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
10:52 am
USinUK,
I can loan you my monitor cleaning kit if you like.
Paul,
Meg Foster? That woman has devil eyes. Seriously.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
10:54 am
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
10:48 am
———–
Open your eyes, man. He is doing everything he can, and it is starting to work. Get with the program…
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
10:55 am
Paul –
okay. I’ll bite. which cultural values did we press on Bosnia? (and I’m not trying to be snarky – I really want to understand where you’re coming from on this)
WhoCares
June 24th, 2009
10:56 am
I wonder what would happen if Israel offered to help install a democracy in Iran?
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
10:56 am
Paul,
Devil eyes like Cindy McCain. Those womens’ eye just ain’t right.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
10:57 am
WhoCares 10:47
[[Oh….and we also forgot blowing up Kadafee’s (sp) house when he wasn’t home. Who get’s the credit for that?]]
Qadaffi was home. He left the compound just before the bombs dropped. Warned by a foreign government.
I guess this is why some people switch monikers. Covers embarrassment.
Mike
June 24th, 2009
10:58 am
Hey Jay … what a joke?!?!? The government is taking over banks, the auto industry, health care and anything else it can … and is about to institute a federal sales tax. President Obama is “deeply concerned” about everything — North Korea aiming missiles our way, the voters in Iran — but can’t take leadership on anything. And you write about what Bush did wrong!?!?!? No small wonder that liberal newspapers like the AJC and liberal writers like you are struggling to survive.
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
10:58 am
Any chance you libs are vacationing in Hawaii this 4th of July?
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
10:58 am
“Open your eyes, man. He is doing everything he can, and it is starting to work”
Deficit going up.
Unemployment going up.
Still wasting time in Iraq.
If that’s helping, I don’t want to see what he does when he starts hurting this country!
jt
June 24th, 2009
10:59 am
Bush, Obama, Cheney, Rumsfeild, etc….
It is still the same 99 rapscallions in the senate.
(give or take a few for criminal transgressions).
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:00 am
“The government is taking over banks, the auto industry, health care and anything else it can”
Holy hell! When did this happen?
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
11:02 am
Wrong Normal, and what is starting to work?
Socialization, yeah I guess so.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:03 am
Bosch
Meg Foster carried the movie. Cindy’s eyes are fiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnne…………………………
USinUK
Okay, since we have so many newbies around, whenever people go on and on about how Bush imposed our will and acted alone and didn’t like what he saw in another country…
I just ask how it’s different from Bosnia. Usual response is “but that’s different! It’s genocide!” So I ask, well, it’s ‘wrong’ because? In whose eyes? Does it happen elsewhere? Do we intervene everywhere? If it’s wrong, the UN doesn’t act because?
Sure there are holes and answers. Bosch stays out of it because we gave a practical response (We intervene because we can). There’s truth to that.
Then you mix in Pres Clinton’s inaction in Africa and Biden’s Sudan statements and it gets dicey.
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
11:03 am
I still remember Wooten’s (I think) quote the other day:
“President Barack Obama admits he “loses sleep worrying about the deficit.” Sort of like an alcoholic worrying that he drinks too much, as he reaches for another drink to drown his worries”
So true, so true
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
11:03 am
Paul, thanks for the fraking kind words.
You mentioned Barney Frank, so I’ll note here that the man’s introduced what appear to be two utterly sensible bills concerning marijuana for medical and personal use.
Perhaps BOR will think to bring this up tonight, although I doubt it, since it hasn’t seemed to generate much media interest, far as I can tell.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:05 am
UsinUK
Sorry, I didn’t answer you question as to what cultural values we impose:
Stop killing people you don’t like. Especially if you’re killing a lot of them. And it’s based on tribe or religion.
Jeff in Roswell
June 24th, 2009
11:05 am
Hey Jay,
Would you consider writing an article on how you have failed as a journalist? You just don’t have what it takes.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:06 am
Hmmm. I take back what I said about Sanford – having respect for him and all for taking off and going hiking. This story is bizarre.
Argentina? What the hell?
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:08 am
DB, Gwinnettian
He may bring it up. He’s not big on the medical marijuana or drug legalization thing. Likes to bring up San Francisco (which I think misses the frakkin’ point, as that’s merely an illustration of poorly worded and enforced laws). But that plays to his ‘traditionalist’ vs ’secular progressive’ thing.
TnGelding
June 24th, 2009
11:08 am
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
10:58 am
We prefer Hawaii in the winter. There’s a better chance of one of our missiles striking Hawaii or the mainland than one from N. Korea. The lovely Sarah might get antsy and launch one.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:08 am
Jeff in Roswell,
Really?
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:08 am
USinUK
You have deciphered I write all that while smiling, right?
coach k
June 24th, 2009
11:09 am
must be a liberal, as far as I am concerned he had a good presidency for what he was handed, he was not a yes man like this idiot we have now
TnGelding
June 24th, 2009
11:10 am
Jeff in Roswell
June 24th, 2009
11:05 am
Jay’s laughing all the way to the bank. Writer extraordinaire.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:12 am
Paul –
actually, you did answer it – and very well, thankyew
I see where you’re coming from – just don’t know that I agree. Saddam was no threat. he wasn’t commiting genocide. we had set up a no-fly zone which was protecting the Kurds. things were fine.
Bosnia, not so much. and it wasn’t just the leadership, it was the civilians, as well.
lastly – we didn’t try to “install democracy” in Bosnia like we (supposedly) are in Iraq.
but, I do see where you’re coming from – I’m not 100% with you, but I’m not 100% against, either …
JB
June 24th, 2009
11:13 am
I ‘ll take “W” any day over this left wing, big spending, world view, blame America, Pro choice up to the last day,socialist ex Muslim. Not a racist but a realist……….His skin color is fine….I can think of lot’s of people of color I would be proud to be President. I say this because if you don’t agree with him, that is what you are branded. That is weak……. If he were blue I wouldn’t agree with him. speaking of color, what’s with his purple lips ?
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:13 am
so, Peadawg … amuse me. tell me about the banks we’re taking over. make me laugh.
Jeff in Roswell
June 24th, 2009
11:14 am
Laughing all the way to the bank? Hahahahaha!!! You call what he makes “money”? You’re killing me over here!
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
11:14 am
USinUK, I never mentioned taking over banks. that was someone else.
TnGelding
June 24th, 2009
11:14 am
coach k
June 24th, 2009
11:09 am
He was a yes man to Cheney. Congress should have brought him to his knees and the GOP could still be in the majority. Of course he wouldn’t have been reelected, either.
willie
June 24th, 2009
11:15 am
Jay is a “failed” writer…he is writing for the AJC, right?
TnGelding
June 24th, 2009
11:16 am
Jeff in Roswell
June 24th, 2009
11:14 am
Would you care to meet and compare W2s?
yabba dabba-doo
June 24th, 2009
11:16 am
Jay, you really do enjoy toying with these gomers on here everyday don’t you? These responses are so predictable from this same group of lefties or righties, that I bet you could almost write them for them.
If it weren’t so scary it would be funny. People actually have these thoughts? wow. Well, have fun toying with the inmates. I’ll keep on reading it and laughing or shaking my head as I’m sure you do.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
11:19 am
Paul:
Stop killing people you don’t like. Especially if you’re killing a lot of them. And it’s based on tribe or religion.
—————
Whe I got out of the Navy first time in’70, I used to wear a shirt that said “Join the Navy, visit exotic places, meet interesting people, and kill them”. Whe asked why I would wear such a shirt, I always told them it was my way to say how stupid war is…still is too.
—————-
TNGelding
Please tell me Sarah doesn’t have a nuc…
The way we weren't
June 24th, 2009
11:20 am
For one thing, I think GeeWhiz actually believed all that crap that many Evangelicals were feeding him such as him being on a mission from God, etc. Of course, that’s just one of many of his problems. The bigger issue — his eight ruinous years at the wheel is nothing less than proof positive that our system of checks and balances is fundamentally flawed. We desperately need to find some way to prevent the likes of another Bush/Cheney administration from ever surfacing again.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:20 am
peadawg – d-oh! my bad. and my apologies.
Sheesh
June 24th, 2009
11:21 am
LOL The lefties are still talking about Bush while Barak Hussein Obama spends the country into oblivion. If you want to know what constitutes a failed presidency, pay close attention to the current White House. Its happening right before your eyes you sheeple!
coach k
June 24th, 2009
11:21 am
I agree Cheney was not much help, I am just tired of people trashing Bush from afar with no idea what they are talking about. Us in Uk if you think Saddam was doing nothing wrong, I guess the 300,000 he gassed was all right. This country is going down the tubes thanks to your new liberal pansies in office.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:21 am
USinUK 11:12
[[I see where you’re coming from - just don’t know that I agree.]]
Oh, I’m not saying I disagree, either. Or that I even agree. Asking a question is not the same as advocating a position. But it is interesting to take an issue so many are so passionate about and ask, “what about…”
Some think it’s merely annoying. But, I really do like explore thought processes and how one thing is okay while another one isn’t.
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
11:22 am
No problem USinUK
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:22 am
mike – that question should have been for you …
do. please. tell us what banks have been nationalized.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:25 am
Normal
But some people will never get it. You need to get in touch with Bosch. He has this idea for a really good t-shirt business –
Sheesh
The country was spent more into oblivion right after WWII. And there wasn’t nearly the dramatic change in new technologies impelling economic growth. And we made it past that just fine.
Normal
June 24th, 2009
11:27 am
Well PEADAWG, you finally did it…you said something I CAN agree with you on. We are, INDEED, wasteing too much timr in Iraq…Just sayin’
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:28 am
coach k,
“I am just tired of people trashing Bush from afar with no idea what they are talking about”
Uh, yeah we do.
F. Derrick Hall
June 24th, 2009
11:29 am
All of you are partisan morons. R’s and D’s are the EXACT SAME thing and serve the EXACT SAME corporate interests. There are not 2 parties in the US political system, only 1.
But never mind that- you sheep keep going back and forth about how your “team” is right and the other “team” is wrong. It’s all a game, right?
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:30 am
Paul –
I totally agree with you – and I liked the way you framed the discussion. well done, take the rest of the day off.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:30 am
Oh and coach k,
“This country is going down the tubes thanks to your new liberal pansies in office”
Oh, please do tell. Soooo……this all started in January? Okkkkaaaaayyyyy.
PappyHappy
June 24th, 2009
11:30 am
Well, Cheney may have been a problem for Bush, but it appears that Bush is the Obama CRUTCH! If things continue the way they are going, there will be a multitude of reasons for Obama’s failure!!
When President Obama took office, he probably had greater support for his personal success than any president since at least John Kennedy. He appeared new, refreshing and smart. That was then, this is now.
The first disappointment came with his nomination of tax evaders to cabinet posts: Timothy F. Geithner; Hilda L. Solis; and Kathleen Sebelius. (This excludes Tom Daschle and Bill Richardson, who had their own ethics challenges, forcing them to withdraw early.) This did provide a glimpse into the future.
Then came the starts and stops on ‘financial recovery’ proposals. One day, the effort was going to be to ‘buy up toxic assets’; the next day, the money was going to be used to make loans; the next day, there was going to be programs to assist folks already in their homes. For Pete’s sake – BANKS ARE STILL BEING SHUT DOWN WITH THREE BEING CLOSED OVER THE WEEKEND (20- 21 June)!! Where is the taxpayer money going?? COULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL US WHERE WE ARE??
Then came the much awaited ‘stimulus package’ (hundreds of billions of tax payer money) for all of those ‘shovel ready’ projects (like the turtle tunnel and no doubt tributes to John Murtha) that were designed to hold unemployment at 8%! Unemployment is now at 9.4%, and even the White House now admits that unemployment will exceed 10%!
In March, the President met with the Commander of the American Legion and advised that he was going to propose that service connected injured veterans purchase their own health insurance – ‘because they volunteered for service!’ The following month, Janet Napolitano tagged veterans as ‘potential terrorists’. Sadly, in early June, two Army soldiers were shot – one killed – in Little Rock by a radical muslim convert (terrorist). The White House’s silence was deafening. During his extensive press conference on June 23, he did not mention Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, war on terror, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard or Reserves during a 50 plus minute presser. What would one take from his omission while we have hundreds of thousands in harms way?
Then came the auto take over! For an administration who promised transparency, could someone please explain the logic that went into the closure of dealerships throughout the Country? Did you have to be friends with Barney Frank to remain open? Billions of taxpayer money was expended to preclude GM and Chrysler from going bankrupt, but what happened? THEY ARE BANKRUPT, and there is no doubt, the spoils of Chrysler will go to Italy!! More recently, WHY DID THE ADMINISTRATION PROVIDE $1,600,000,000 to Nissan?? Are they not a foreign own manufacturer? Is this just money down the tubes??
From a foreign affairs point of view, I am again sorely disappointed. It
has apparently become fashionable to apologize for the US’ involvements. Allow me to pose some rhetorical questions: Where would Great Britain, France, Belgium, The Netherlands be today without our involvement two times during the last century? Where would China and other Pacific Rim countries be today had it not been for our involvement?
And after those wars, what other country would have invested their resources – as we did – in Germany, Italy and Japan – and make them modern, world class countries? Where would Korea be today were it not for our involvement? And the list goes on and on – including Panama (18 young American soldiers gave their lives in the removal of dictator Manuel Noriega – 27 total including 3 civilians); Kuwait; Bosnia Herzegovina, Kosovo, and the former Soviet Block countries – too numerous to mention. And now, the White House is faced with two real dilemmas – Korea and Iran. Will the defense of this Country be first priority, or will the perceived image of the president take precedent?? (Scary that the question even has to be posed isn’t it??)
…And how about the CZARS? Are we up to 20 yet? When will the main stream media start asking questions regarding the role of THE CABINET?? Other than the President, who will have overwatch responsibility and authority over the CZARS? Does this not bother anyone else??
And now, the health care debate is on!
A survey by the Physicians’ Foundation has uncovered what it calls widespread frustration and concern among primary care physicians nationwide, which could lead to a dramatic decrease in practicing doctors in the near future. The survey examined the causes behind the doctors’ dissatisfaction, the state of their practices and the future of care.
The resulting findings show the possibility of significantly decreased access for Americans in the years ahead, as many doctors are forced to reduce the number of patients they see or quit the practice of medicine outright.
An overwhelming majority — 78 percent — of physicians believe that there is an existing shortage of primary care doctors in the United States today. Additionally, nearly half of them — 49 percent, or more than 150,000 practicing doctors– say that over the next three years they plan to reduce the number of patients they see or stop practicing entirely.
“Going into this project we generally knew about the shortage of physicians; what we didn’t know is how much worse it could get over the next few years,” said Lou Goodman, PhD, President of The Physicians’ Foundation. “The bottom line is that the person you’ve known as your family doctor could be getting ready to disappear — and there might not be a replacement.”
To test the above, I have asked my local physicians their plans. The answers were shocking: one is planning on leaving practice and start operating equipment for other physicians — to rid himself of mal practice insurance, and bureaucratic paper work from the government. Another one is looking into leaving his medical practice for ‘moral reasons’ if ‘Obama Care’ comes about. He reminded me that a physician’s first obligation is “to do no harm’. None that I spoke to are recommending the medical profession to young students due to government interference; bureaucracy; possible use of a board of bureaucrats to determine cost effective treatment; and the lack of TORT reform from the politicians — many of whom are lawyers.
My sensing is that Obama is already having an ‘unintended consequence’ on our health care system: A SHORTAGE OF PHYSICIANS!! Now that is change we will believe in within a few years!!
HIS OWN DOCTOR IS AGAINST ‘OBAMA CARE’!!
http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/18/obama-doctor-knocks-obamacare-business-healthcare-obamas-doctor.html
ASK YOUR OWN PHYSICIANS THEIR PLANS, AND THEIR MOTIVATIONS!! YOU ARE GOING TO BE SHOCKED AT WHAT YOU FIND!!
Look at our medical schools!! Are they filled? If not, why not???
Folks, the politicians HAVE NOT ACCOMPLISHED THEIR BASIC HOMEWORK!! With a looming doctor shortage – which will no doubt worsen if President Obama’s policies come to fruition – WHO WILL DELIVER HEALTH CARE?
HENRY WAXMAN??????
Concerned? Call Sen Baucus’ office:
Committee On Finance
219 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-6200
(202) 224-4515
In the course of five months, this administration has gone from one of GREAT PROMISE, to one of astonishing disbelief!! Could Rev Wright be correct? Could Obama be just ‘another politician from Chicago’?
Normal
June 24th, 2009
11:31 am
Sheesh…Bless your heart, too…
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:31 am
“trashing Bush from afar”
so, if we go to TX can we trash him there??? I used to live in DC when he was President, so I really wasn’t “afar” at the time – so, was THAT okay???
DB, Gwinnettian
June 24th, 2009
11:31 am
Would you care to meet and compare W2s?
First, Jeff has to bench-press 3x his weight and then he has to run a 2h30m marathon. While boffing a supermodel. Typical day for Jeff.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:32 am
Paul,
“take the rest of the day off.”
NO!!! I’ll have no one to goof off with.
pronounced "ChEEney"
June 24th, 2009
11:32 am
I think Bush’s incompetence and weakness became most apparent on 9/11. Bush disappeared for three days without a peep (a stronger president would have been on television *immediately,* simply to reassure the public that someone was in charge), while Cheney made all the decisions, including the critical one to ground all air traffic. That showed who was in charge. I think it set a pattern, as well.
Odumma
June 24th, 2009
11:32 am
Bookman and the left are so brainwashed (or brain dead) that its hard to even bother with facts. Facts like the real estate/economic collapse that was caused by of giving home loans to unqualified people – liberal policies and you all know it.
Bosch
June 24th, 2009
11:33 am
Dear blog moderator –
What is wrong with the 11:30? Not a bad word among it.
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
11:35 am
Normal,
What about the Deficit going up and Unemployment going up? You don’t agree that that’s happening as well? And that it’s gotten worse under Obama?
Keisha Waites
June 24th, 2009
11:39 am
The unwillingness to embrace change and new ideas.
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:40 am
Slap-Happy-Pappy-
first, your post is WAY too long … but this little nugget jumped out:
“The following month, Janet Napolitano tagged veterans as ‘potential terrorists’”
ah. no. the report was drafted during he Bush administration, SHE didn’t tag them as potential terrorists. the DHS said they could be easily lured. (and, lest you forget, McVeigh and Nichols were veterans of Gulf I, so it does happen)
“is the taxpayer money going” (TARP) – TARP money has gone to the “backbone” banks, not the mom-and-pop banks. they’re insured by the FDIC. Meanwhile, the gov’t has already started getting the TARP funds BACK from 10 of the major banks they lent to – so, as much as it may pain you, THE PROGRAM WORKED.
“fashionable to apologize for the US’ involvements”
please. show me ONE apology. ONE QUOTE where Obama said “I’m sorry”. Despite O’Reilley and Limbaugh and Hannity’s panties being in a collective wad, Obama has never apologized. what he HAS done is acknowledge that our actions have not always been positive (such as the ouster of Moussedagh).
“None that I spoke to are recommending the medical profession to young students due to government interference”
hahahahaha … yeah. students are fleeing medical school in droves. just like in the UK. we have NO doctors here – no students going to med school. we have to use the internet and forage for roots to cure our ills.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
11:40 am
USinUK 11:30
I’ve never been so nicely kicked out of someplace! You sure you’re not with the diplomatic corps?
Bosch 11:32
Not to worry. I have this problem with authority figures…
USinUK and Bosch
[[“trashing Bush from afar”]]
Theological time. Was talking to a Georgia native. Good Southern Baptist. Around Christmas time. I observed the Wise Men who visited Jesus were probably astronomers from another country. He said no, they were firemen. I said ‘what’ and he said ‘Well, sure, don’tcha’ read your scrip-tures? Says right here they came from a-far!”
badda bing badda bum glad a new thread’s up -
Normal
June 24th, 2009
11:42 am
PAPPYHAPPY: You post is too long to reply to at once, but I’ll try to pick at it.
Of course the health care people and doctors are against President Obama’s plan, because they are afraid they are going to lose money. That is the only way they have to keep score. They don’t care one whit about the health of the working poor or anyone else who doesn’t have the means to afford them. Doctors do not take the Hippocratic Oath seriously anymore, and I, for one, can live with less doctors, if they take their oath seriously, and are out there to heal and not to play golf on Wednesdays… There will be more to join them…Just sayin’
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:43 am
peadawg-
UNEMPLOYMENT IS A LAGGING INDICATOR!!! Unemployment doesn’t LEAD the economic recovery, unemployment follows months behind.
Think about it this way — you own a factory and you’re down to bare bones staff. Do you immediately start hiring people if you THINK the economy is improving??? or do you put it off as long as possible, trying to maximize your capital, until you’re threatened with falling behind on your orders.
THAT’S how the economy works.
Peadawg
June 24th, 2009
11:46 am
USinUK, and the deficit? What about the growing deficit and the spend spend spend mentality that Obama is continuing to do?
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
11:50 am
If this Health care plan goes through, who will John (typical Democrat) Edwards have to sue?
USinUK
June 24th, 2009
11:52 am
Peadawg –
I’m heading upstairs to the next room – but, in the meantime, may I recommend a little light reading from Milton Keynes. He’s an economist that believes that, if consumer spending falls, government spending steps in to prop up the economy until consumers can step back in. It’s been followed by Presidents for the last (nearly) 100 years, including Reagan.
HDB
June 24th, 2009
11:53 am
It might be that the democratic presidents use our military more than Republicans.
WWI – Wilson D
WWII – Roosevelt – D
Korea – Truman – D
Viet Nam – Kennedy – D
Tonkin Bay Resolution – Johnson – D
Grenada – Reagan – R
Kuwait – Bush I – R
Afghanistan – Bush II – R Up the ante Obama – D
Iraq – Bush II – R
Not a judgment call, just statistics.
People fail to realize that when Democrats use the military, it’s due to the Republicans setting up the situation that requires military force:
Wilson (D) – Predecessor: Taft (R)
FDR (D) – Predecessor: Hoover (R)
Kennedy/Johnson (D) – Predecessor: Eisenhower (R)
Clinton (D) – Predecessors: Reagan/Bush41 (R)
Obama (D) – Predecessor: Bush43
@ Sheesh:11:21 am
“The lefties are still talking about Bush while Barack Hussein Obama spends the country into oblivion. If you want to know what constitutes a failed presidency, pay close attention to the current White House.”
This current spending was STARTED by the Bush Doctrine…..lest you forget:
1) War in Iraq/Afghanistan
2) Government bailout of the finance indstry
3) Failure to appropriately budget
4) No-bid contracts to Bush/Cheney cronies
5) Failure to address domestic issues
The current rate of spending is NECESSARY to correct the inadequacies done under the GOP..to correct the course of this nation towards financial/economic/energy independence….and to address the inadequacies of the current social fabric of this country. Market-based solutions are NOT ALWAYS the correct answer; this nation MUST develop a HEART!!
jim
June 24th, 2009
12:04 pm
The downfall of the Bush presidency is the same as the downfall of the republican party, in total. Domestically, they forgot about being fiscally conservative. That’s it! Nothing magical or difficult.
bushwacker
June 24th, 2009
12:06 pm
We know you guys don’t really believe the things you say, your job is to get people to reply to your column.
But I’ll take the bait anyway!
I suspect history will show President Bush freed 50 million people in 2 countries, and prevented another attack on America for 8 years after 911.
The later is te only thing that matters to me!!!!
History will show President Clinton had an affair in the Oval Office and was impeached.
History will show O’bama turned a $1 Trillion dollar deficit into $10 Tillion, makes sense to me???
Normal
June 24th, 2009
12:07 pm
Peadawg, Sorry I couldn’t get back to you sooner (Tech Meetings do get in the way of a good blog), reading the posts, USinUK has answered pretty much as I would have so you were in good hands. Give President Obama the rest of his term to set things back on the correct course. If he hasn’t done it, then vote against him; I know I will…Just sayin’
Linda
June 24th, 2009
12:14 pm
There was only ONE bad decision? Iraq, 9/11, Katrina, Abu Gharib (I could go on) don’t count?
Decisions are made by the President, regardless of his counsel. It’s his choice and his alone.
skydog
June 24th, 2009
12:16 pm
Thanks Whiner, I needed my joke for the day…Bush the most successfule president since the 80’s…. LOL….
snaddermen
June 24th, 2009
12:21 pm
Look at how pathetic Jay Bookman’s life is… what does he know about the world anyway. Your opinion doesn’t count Bookman.
Brill
June 24th, 2009
12:23 pm
What a pathetic attempt to distract people away from the catastrophe that is Barack Obama.
Look ! Is that Elvis !?!
Charles Gibson
June 24th, 2009
12:37 pm
Although some of Bush’s decisions were retrospectively failed, what gives you the right to declare his Presidency failed?…..I’d like for you to tell me how many terrorist attacks the USA has had on it’s soil since 9-11-2001……Oh thats right…NONE!…..Some part of you should be thankful, as well as all the rest of us, that neither we nor any of our families have been harmed since that time…..But you have your head so far up Obamas, well you get the point, that you can’t be thankful for being safe for almost eight years….Just saying though!
Reality
June 24th, 2009
12:40 pm
“The difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull, lip stick.” The luny wing of the right thought this was a brilliant statement(corny) that brought down the house during the Republican National Convention. This speaks volumes of the simple mindset of the lemmings. Riddle me this. Why was Mr. Bush disinvited to the Republican National Convention?
RAMBLE ON!!!
June 24th, 2009
12:58 pm
HDB, so it was the GOP’s fault for WWI, and WWII. Well said moonbat.
pass the Kool-Aid.
Maybe if W were president then, we could talk about how we needlessly TOUTERED Hitler and how he was no threat to us.
Paul
June 24th, 2009
1:28 pm
Does Rep Barney Frank ever learn?
“In March, Fannie Mae (FNM.N)(FNM.P) said it would no longer guarantee mortgages on condos in buildings where fewer than 70 percent of the units have been sold, up from 51 percent, the paper said. Freddie Mac (FRE.P)(FRE.N) is due to implement similar policies next month, the paper said.
In a letter to the CEO’s of both companies, Representatives Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Anthony Weiner warned that a 70 percent sales threshold “may be too onerous” and could lead condo buyers to shun new developments, according to the paper.
The legislators asked the companies to “make appropriate adjustments” to their underwriting standards for condos, the paper added.”
Meanwhile, the Iranian freedom fighters continue.
“Protesters and riot police clashed in the streets around Iran’s parliament Wednesday as hundreds of people converged on a Tehran square in defiance of government orders to halt demonstrations demanding a new presidential election, witnesses said. “
Gandalf, the White! (!)
June 24th, 2009
1:29 pm
Normal, Every notice how anything you write is silly? I have! just sayin…
Gandalf, the White! (!)
June 24th, 2009
1:30 pm
Nobama is the correct name for the asshat in chief, his wife lies as freely as he. Where does he smoke? Not in front of his family, not every day…I bet that asshat smokes in the Oval Office! He’s silly that way. Curious George is he.
RealityKing
June 24th, 2009
1:38 pm
This is halarious!! In light of Obama’s doofus VP..
What Would Jesus Do?
June 24th, 2009
2:15 pm
Jesus would support Bush.
Photius
June 24th, 2009
3:49 pm
Jay Bookman, you are very witty and I like reading your post daily. Keep it up!