<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inspectors general need congressional backing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/</link>
	<description>An Atlanta blog with a little bit of opinion about a whole lot of things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:49:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WoodstockDave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-60423</link>
		<dc:creator>WoodstockDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-60423</guid>
		<description>Hey Bookman, why did you ignore the little issue of Obama breaking the law by firing Walpin without the required 30 day notice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bookman, why did you ignore the little issue of Obama breaking the law by firing Walpin without the required 30 day notice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-60135</link>
		<dc:creator>Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-60135</guid>
		<description>Sidebar -- see the following.  The arrogance and egotistical, self-serving attitude of the CA dems and this administration is beyond belief....

____________

In case you forgot, Barbara Boxer is a senator. 

The feisty California lawmaker felt the need to remind an Army brigadier general of that fact Tuesday during a hearing before her Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, where the military officer testifying had the apparent gall to call Boxer &quot;ma&#039;am.&quot; 

Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was testifying on the Louisiana coastal restoration process in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. He began to answer one of Boxer&#039;s questions with &quot;ma&#039;am&quot; when Boxer immediately cut him off. 

&quot;You know, do me a favor,&quot; an irritated Boxer said. &quot;Could say &#039;senator&#039; instead of &#039;ma&#039;am?&#039;&quot;

&quot;Yes, ma&#039;am,&quot; Walsh interjected.

&quot;It&#039;s just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I&#039;d appreciate it, yes, thank you,&quot; she said. 

&quot;Yes, senator,&quot; he responded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidebar &#8212; see the following.  The arrogance and egotistical, self-serving attitude of the CA dems and this administration is beyond belief&#8230;.</p>
<p>____________</p>
<p>In case you forgot, Barbara Boxer is a senator. </p>
<p>The feisty California lawmaker felt the need to remind an Army brigadier general of that fact Tuesday during a hearing before her Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, where the military officer testifying had the apparent gall to call Boxer &#8220;ma&#8217;am.&#8221; </p>
<p>Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was testifying on the Louisiana coastal restoration process in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. He began to answer one of Boxer&#8217;s questions with &#8220;ma&#8217;am&#8221; when Boxer immediately cut him off. </p>
<p>&#8220;You know, do me a favor,&#8221; an irritated Boxer said. &#8220;Could say &#8217;senator&#8217; instead of &#8216;ma&#8217;am?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, ma&#8217;am,&#8221; Walsh interjected.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I&#8217;d appreciate it, yes, thank you,&#8221; she said. </p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, senator,&#8221; he responded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-60127</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-60127</guid>
		<description>&quot;White House: Firing AmeriCorps IG an act of &quot;political courage&quot;

I guess in the continuing re-defining of words and phrases by PresBO, that &quot;political courage&quot; is defined as -- quick, find me some cover, a scapegoat, and backdate the paperwork...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;White House: Firing AmeriCorps IG an act of &#8220;political courage&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess in the continuing re-defining of words and phrases by PresBO, that &#8220;political courage&#8221; is defined as &#8212; quick, find me some cover, a scapegoat, and backdate the paperwork&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59913</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59913</guid>
		<description>Mrs. Godzilla 8:37

I hope the rest of the Congress feels that way.  Still doesn&#039;t correct the fact Pres Obama cosponsored the law requiring 30 days&#039; notice to Congress with reasons, not a notice to the IG that in 30 days you&#039;re toast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrs. Godzilla 8:37</p>
<p>I hope the rest of the Congress feels that way.  Still doesn&#8217;t correct the fact Pres Obama cosponsored the law requiring 30 days&#8217; notice to Congress with reasons, not a notice to the IG that in 30 days you&#8217;re toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59877</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59877</guid>
		<description>So McCaskill says it&#039;s fine. McCaskill claimed that if she were elected last term, she was going to make Missouri the stem cell research capitol of the world. The last I checked, they ain&#039;t there yet. Why do dems want to protect people like Johnson ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So McCaskill says it&#8217;s fine. McCaskill claimed that if she were elected last term, she was going to make Missouri the stem cell research capitol of the world. The last I checked, they ain&#8217;t there yet. Why do dems want to protect people like Johnson ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @@</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59871</link>
		<dc:creator>@@</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59871</guid>
		<description>Oops! it was McDuck.

Now I get it....Duck the Spooge.

Alrighty din!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! it was McDuck.</p>
<p>Now I get it&#8230;.Duck the Spooge.</p>
<p>Alrighty din!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @@</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59869</link>
		<dc:creator>@@</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59869</guid>
		<description>Never mind DB, when I googled &quot;Spooge&quot; the definition was unbecoming.

What an odd choice in names.

Old McDonald had a &quot;spooge&quot;

eey eye eey eye ooooo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind DB, when I googled &#8220;Spooge&#8221; the definition was unbecoming.</p>
<p>What an odd choice in names.</p>
<p>Old McDonald had a &#8220;spooge&#8221;</p>
<p>eey eye eey eye ooooo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs.  Godzilla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59864</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs.  Godzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59864</guid>
		<description>McCaskill: Reasons For Firing IG Are &quot;Well Founded&quot;
By Zachary Roth - June 17, 2009, 5:58PM
We asked earlier today whether Sen. Claire McCaskill would be satisfied with the White House&#039;s explanation of its reasons for firing AmeriCorps IG Gerald Walpin. And it looks the answer is yes. 

McCaskill said in a statement, reports CNN, that the White House was now in full compliance with the law, and added: &quot;The reasons given in the most recent White House letter are substantial and the decision to remove Walpin appears well founded.&quot;

FROM TPM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCaskill: Reasons For Firing IG Are &#8220;Well Founded&#8221;<br />
By Zachary Roth &#8211; June 17, 2009, 5:58PM<br />
We asked earlier today whether Sen. Claire McCaskill would be satisfied with the White House&#8217;s explanation of its reasons for firing AmeriCorps IG Gerald Walpin. And it looks the answer is yes. </p>
<p>McCaskill said in a statement, reports CNN, that the White House was now in full compliance with the law, and added: &#8220;The reasons given in the most recent White House letter are substantial and the decision to remove Walpin appears well founded.&#8221;</p>
<p>FROM TPM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @@</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59861</link>
		<dc:creator>@@</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59861</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Oy. “Spooge” is, obviously, me.&lt;/i&gt;

(Snicker)

I&#039;m curious...why do you guys do that, DB? Now I&#039;ll have to google AJC+Bookman+Spooge for a different perspective of your &quot;blog persona(s)&quot;.

It&#039;s so funny to watch you guys screw up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Oy. “Spooge” is, obviously, me.</i></p>
<p>(Snicker)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious&#8230;why do you guys do that, DB? Now I&#8217;ll have to google AJC+Bookman+Spooge for a different perspective of your &#8220;blog persona(s)&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so funny to watch you guys screw up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2009/06/18/inspectors-general-need-congressional-backing/comment-page-4/#comment-59858</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/?p=1288#comment-59858</guid>
		<description>the guy is 77, he could have been confused. The fact is he did his job and another multi-millionaire democrat got caught taking money that was not his. Kevin Johnson clearly had the money to pay a personal assistant but chose to use taxpayer money, he felt entitled, Just Like Democrat John Conyers and his wife. She is looking at jail time for taking bribes. I wonder if the Conyers filed a joint return because I doubt they listed the bribes on the tax form, they we not patriotic. Why is this story not in the news ? A lady in Alaska filed an ethics complaint against Sarah Pahlin for receiving a jacket from he husbands snowmobile sponser and it made the news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the guy is 77, he could have been confused. The fact is he did his job and another multi-millionaire democrat got caught taking money that was not his. Kevin Johnson clearly had the money to pay a personal assistant but chose to use taxpayer money, he felt entitled, Just Like Democrat John Conyers and his wife. She is looking at jail time for taking bribes. I wonder if the Conyers filed a joint return because I doubt they listed the bribes on the tax form, they we not patriotic. Why is this story not in the news ? A lady in Alaska filed an ethics complaint against Sarah Pahlin for receiving a jacket from he husbands snowmobile sponser and it made the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
