From the Lynchberg (Va.) News and Advance:
Liberty University has revoked its recognition of the campus Democratic Party club, saying “we are unable to lend support to a club whose parent organization stands against the moral principles held by” the university.
“It kind of happened out of nowhere,” said Brian Diaz, president of LU’s student Democratic Party organization, which LU formally recognized in October.
Diaz said he was notified of the school’s decision May 15 in an e-mail from Mark Hine, vice president of student affairs.
According to the e-mail, the club must stop using the university’s name, holding meetings on campus, or advertising events. Violators could incur one or more reprimands under the school’s Liberty Way conduct code, and anyone who accumulates 30 reprimands is subject to expulsion.
Hine said late Thursday that the university could not sanction an official club that supported Democratic candidates.
“We are in no way attempting to stifle free speech.”
Legally, Liberty University is well within its rights. Politically and otherwise, it’s a sad decision. It’s less about freedom of speech than freedom of conscience, and it blatantly reinforces the link between the Republican Party and the conservative evangelicals. The old-time Baptists who fought so hard against mixing church and state business are probably rolling over in their graves.
299 comments Add your comment
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
12:23 pm
mike,
No, I don’t.
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:25 pm
This is amusing. Bill Maher seems to think that it is liberals who are supressing free speech on campuses:
“I’m a free speech person. And I would say especially on campuses in the last 10 or 15 years, the repression of speech has come more from the left.”
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/05/24/maher-trashes-liberals-they-object-they-know-what-theyre-objecting
DannyX
May 24th, 2009
12:27 pm
Some courses at Liberty U that still have a few openings for the fall semester:
WWJD? 101: Explore the modern methods Jesus would use against the evil-doers. Stone throwing is so outdated. Learn how to build a wall on our southern border to keep out the Christian immigrants. Understand why Jesus would be furious if gays were to join the military and killed Muslims in His name. Discuss things like why greed is now good, and discover why divorce is actually good for the children.
Sewing 101: No we did not forget the women. In this class women design and create new robes for Jesus to wear when he returns. Learn how to design and sew new army fatigue robes to keep Jesus safe while visiting the troops in different jungle and desert locations. Also, design your own Rapture clothes so you don’t fly up to heaven naked.
Liberty Law: Learn how to create and argue good old fashioned Christian hypocrisy. Divorce is good, homosexuality evil. Thou shalt not kill? Hardly. Discover those man made waivers that make Christ proud. Learn how killing innocent Muslim Iraqis makes us safer, and special in the eyes of our savior. Most important learn how to debate the importance of torture in our everyday lives.
Sports: Yes there are many different sports for the young testosterone Christian. (Males only please.) Learn how to throw stones, just like they used to. Play Christian dodgeball using gays as targets. Play “Catch the Immigrant,” see how many Christian immigrants you can round up and send back to Mexico.
Science 101: Learn how the dinosaurs walked the earth with humans just 6,000 short years ago. Watch our modern computer graphics showing the sun revolving around the earth
Theology 101: This course which is taught by Rev Haggard, and shows you how to pray away the evils of homosexuality. Explore the proper ways of massage, pick out the proper crack pipe. Learn how to enjoy gay sex in the comfort of your own bathroom stall. Discover the joys of tap dancing.
Hurry! Space will not last long, and as usual we accept MC, Visa, and Amex.
Kamchak
May 24th, 2009
12:28 pm
Bosch
Live text courtesy of BBC Sport. Sunderland equali(s)zed six minutes later.
Linville
May 24th, 2009
12:29 pm
I certainly didn’t accure you of thinking.
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:29 pm
Bosch –
“No, I don’t.”
Oh sure you do. You just told us about what fundamentalists think heaven will be like.
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:30 pm
DannyX —
Wow, that’s a lot of effort to go in order to let us know how much you dislike those who dare not share your spiritual views. I guess Christians should be more tolerant…like you.
drew
May 24th, 2009
12:31 pm
Off topic….but I honestly cannot peg Redneck Convert.
I guess you could take him at face value, and say he’s just another confused Christian fundamentalist. But then he could be a liberal who has mastered the use of sarcasm. I prefer to see him as the latter, which would make him some kind of southern-fried genius, as opposed to the former, which would make him an ignorant, backwoods, bible-thumper.
Either way, keep ‘em coming. You get my vote for most entertaining blogger.
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:33 pm
drew –
Let me guess. You also admire white guys who perform in black face and do routines based on racist stereotypes too.
Hillbilly Deluxe
May 24th, 2009
12:34 pm
The thing I’ve learned from reading all this is that we’re all equal but some view themselves as more equal than others because their views are superior.
RW-(the original)
May 24th, 2009
12:35 pm
Mike,
Bush isn’t spending our money these days, but the conservatives that came over from the luckovich blog used to blast his spending all the time. We make fun of Obama for ending up in the same place on foreign policy issues primarily because he was so sanctimonious about how he had a better way and was going to change everything only to find out Bush was quite often forced to take the least worst option.
I think in your zeal to condemn everyone you perceive as being thoughtless hacks that only follow some fringe ideology you may miss some good arguments.
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:36 pm
RW –
Fair enough, but I did say “most” not “all”.
drew
May 24th, 2009
12:38 pm
Mike…how’d you guess?? Now, get back to your little spat with Bosch…
DannyX…good stuff! You made me laugh AND caused Mike to get his panties in a wad at the same time! BWAH!
catlady
May 24th, 2009
12:38 pm
BDAtlanta–and Lush Bimbo, while not a subsidiary of the Repub party, is a subdivision (at least in size, or maybe a zip code) of that same party.
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:39 pm
drew –
“Mike…how’d you guess?”
I actually shouldn’t get too much credit. It wasn’t much of a guess. Bigots are bigots.
RW-(the original)
May 24th, 2009
12:41 pm
mike,
I know you said “most” but that really indicts everyone and no one simultaneously.
Gotta run, have a great day everyone.
Michael H. Smith
May 24th, 2009
12:41 pm
Is there no linkage between liberal evangelicals, liberal churches and the Democrat Party Jay?
While on this subject of linkage, there isn’t any linkage found between secular schools, ACORN, Labor Unions and the Democrat Party is there Jay?
Jay in wonderland wake up, you liberals have your organizations and we conservatives have ours. Unfortunately you liberals have the better benefit of having government fund yours. In fact, this is so pronounced that even as a conservative I would concede to making what is the defacto government funding of liberalism an amendment to the Constitution out of respect for the truth’s shake.
OMG, the AJC has just been saved for time and eternity. Jay
’s
mike
May 24th, 2009
12:42 pm
Again, I gotta say that it is amusing that those who like to paint Christians as intolerant are pretty consistently the most intolerant people on this blog.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
12:45 pm
mike,
If you were to ask 100 fundamentalist what they think heaven will be like, I think you will find 100 of those will tell you something very similar to what I described. Arguing for the sake of arguing is rather futile.
RW,
Revisionist history? I don’t remember many who blasted Bush’s spending in Iraq and Afghanistan, as I remember, you guys didn’t want any money wasted here in the U.S., but over in the sand ghettos, it didn’t matter if Bush wasted trillions.
Scooter
May 24th, 2009
12:48 pm
Hillbilly@ 12:34 You forgot to mention which school they attended also!
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
12:51 pm
mike,
Intolerance is a pretty big accusation to make, and there’s not one example here in this thread where someone has expressed that they are intolerant of Christians.
catlady
May 24th, 2009
12:52 pm
Bosch, I believe that colleges that violate the EEOC rules ARE subject to losing federal aid for their students. Likewise, colleges that are unaccredited cannot have students receiving federal aid (see local example). I think Oral Roberts U is not considered a college available for students on federal aid, for example. Liberty has been skirting by for some time. While the aid does follow the student, the student cannot take it to Uncle Buddy’s Truck Driving School, for example. There are certain minimum legal standards.
I have been on college campuses pursuing degrees over the years where the Gay/Lesbian groups’ right to meet have been debated, and legally the school is supposed to afford groups the same perks it offers other, more mainstream groups, such as YD or YR.
catlady
May 24th, 2009
12:54 pm
Given the self selection process, I would be surprised that the banned group would number above 10 on “Liberty U” campus, but even private colleges have to follow the law of the land.
Kamchak
May 24th, 2009
12:59 pm
Bosch
1-nil against Hull??? Did Sir Alex have the second team on the field?
catlady
May 24th, 2009
12:59 pm
jt–is there such thing as an evangelical left? Who is in it? (Name them; it can’t be a long list.)
Reminds me of how my son, who thought many faculty members of his high school were waayy right leaning, characterised himself as a “right wing tree hugger” at his high school graduation awards assembly, and the announcer almost swallowed his on tongue after reading that out loud.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
1:03 pm
catlady,
Schools can fund whatever groups they want or deny that funding. What’s dangerous for a college/university to do is to elaborate on why they are not funding such a group – based on “moral” reasons instead of denying them on a lack of funds, or that the group is not viable or worth the cost, or goes against their mission statement. That opens up a case for EEOC standards to be challenged and makes them more vulnerable to expensive lawsuits. Like I mentioned earlier, if Liberty U stated that they weren’t funding that group because it wasn’t cost effective and not enough participation by students to keep it up and running, there intentions wouldn’t be questionable – especially a private school – they have more leeway in these situations.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
1:04 pm
Kamchak,
Either that, or they went by the pub on the way to the game!
Hillbilly Deluxe
May 24th, 2009
1:12 pm
Bosch:
Hehehehe. Most fundamentalist Christian leaders do want to leave the Union and go to a place where the streets are lined with gold, angels sing on the street corners, and some guy named God sits on a throne on a gold throne somewhere.”
Hillbilly Deluxe
May 24th, 2009
1:13 pm
I messed up my post, sorry
But if you don’t view that as intolerant, you and I have a different definition of the word.
Hillbilly Deluxe
May 24th, 2009
1:15 pm
or these
christo-fascists, Lunatic fringe…. Timothy McVeigh would have been so proud….This is just another example of the American Taliban (read far right
Christians)…. Hillary made the American taliban’s heads explode
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
1:27 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe,
I didn’t state that they didn’t have the right to exist or that their views are wrong – that’s my definition of intolerance.
Hillbilly Deluxe
May 24th, 2009
1:32 pm
Bosch:
We disagree; fair enough.
Herm
May 24th, 2009
1:42 pm
Glenn Beck is a partisan fool, but he is no different than Olbermann or Maddow.
It’s sad watching conservatives push their conditioned mindset – reality free mindset.
clyde
May 24th, 2009
1:46 pm
I’ve read this blog for a few years and have heard very little bad said about Redneck Convert until Mike came along.Just an observation.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
1:57 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe,
Disagreement doesn’t make one intolerant. If I ever stated that fundamentalists were wrong, or they don’t have the right to believe what they want, then I’d be intolerant. And I’ve never stated that because then I would be playing God. Even being prejudiced against a group of people, by my definition, doesn’t make one intolerant. Intolerance, to me, is when you believe that someone’s belief system is wrong, or their actions are wrong based on your own personal beliefs. For example, gay marriage, when you believe that a group of people do not have the rights that other people have simply based on what you believe to be right, that is intolerance. You can be prejudiced against gay people (or fundamentalists), meaning you don’t like them, that’s not intolerance. If you believe their existence is wrong or their actions are wrong simply because of your opinion of what’s right and wrong in the world, that’s intolerance.
And no where have I ever stated categorically that fundamentalists are wrong or do not have the right to believe what they believe. To me, there’s a difference.
Ray
May 24th, 2009
2:15 pm
‘Again, I gotta say that it is amusing that those who like to paint Christians as intolerant are pretty consistently the most intolerant people on this blog.’
Pathetic. Unable to handle the return of serve, the rightwing mantra has become this.
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Drop back and regroup if you have to, but don’t cry about being outdone at your own game.
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Pathetic.
@@
May 24th, 2009
2:18 pm
jay, your SPAM filter seems to be canning my free speech.
Liberty Hardworker
May 24th, 2009
2:25 pm
Do you suppose it is because socialists will not work and expect the government (we working taxpayers) to keep them up?
Unemployment 20% Higher in Democrat Strongholds
Unemployment in April remained 20 percent higher in states won by Democratic candidate Barack Obama in last fall’s presidential election than in states won by Republican candidate John McCain, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics released yesterday. Nationwide, the unemployment rate went from 8.5 percent in March to 8.9 percent in April. WND previously reported that if unemployment numbers in the states won by Obama do not begin improving soon, the Democratic Party may face the prospect of 2010 mid-term election losses in both governor races and in Congress. A national telephone survey conducted by Rasmussen Reports has found…
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=98951
jt
May 24th, 2009
2:33 pm
Catlady- 12:59 pm
jt–is there such thing as an evangelical left? Who is in it? (Name them; it can’t be a long list.)
Using an accepted term of evangilicasm, it would seem as if some of the largest evangilical churches in the world are located right here in Atlanta. One only has to google “black evangelical churches”.
Call me a stereotyper, black evangelicals do not vote republican.
This is in response to my earlier quote.
jt
May 24th, 2009
2:37 pm
Why is evangelicals only associated with white republicans?
Isn’t the Revered Jerimiah Wright an evangelical?
Kamchak
May 24th, 2009
2:37 pm
Oh yeah. I’m gonna believe everything Jerome Corsi says.
Herm
May 24th, 2009
2:40 pm
Fawell didn’t just take money from Moon’s “church.” Falwell traveled to Uruguay and spoke at an event promoting Moon’s youth gigging front group and appeared in support of Moon at other events also. Let me remind you that Moon claims Jesus was a failure who needed Moon to fulfill His mission and Moon now claims that Jesus serves his dead son in heaven. Moon claims his words are God’s.
Fawell’s buddy, Tim LaHaye, has also taken Moon’s money and promoted his “messianic” mission. It isn’t just that Fawell and LaHaye are/were partisan politically but that they do so under a cloak of religion. There associations with and promotion of Moon, clearly expose them as two of the most discernment-free “ministers” in history.
BTW, the money Moon uses to fund these “Christian” preachers – mostly comes from Japan, the primary source of Moon’s cash and where his “church” has been found guilty of swindling widows out of hundreds of millions, likely billions, of dollars. Find some details here: http://tinyurl.com/5aodgn
It isn’t just Falwell and LaHaye who take the old devil’s money, Moon has outspent anyone funding the right in America over the last 30 years. Billions. No one, no one has outspent him pushing and molding today’s conservative movement. No one, and the right moans about that piker Soros. What a bunch of uninformed hypocrites. Moon spent billions and he did so successfully bringing his “vision” of a right wing, theocratic, science-free, homophobic and authoritarian Republican Party/conservative movement into being.
Moon’s is the same organization that the first editor of the Washington Times said was working to subvert our political system and that anyone who takes his money and then claims it was OK because they were not proselytized doesn’t have a clue how they were being used and conned into helping Moon.
see him say it here http://tinyurl.com/pjrfwe
jt
May 24th, 2009
2:41 pm
“why are” for you language nazis.
jt
May 24th, 2009
2:45 pm
Herm- Thank you for seeing that. As a private college, they can ban any one that they like, for any reason, but their hypocrisy in accepting “the devils money” is beyond the pale.
Hillbilly Deluxe
May 24th, 2009
2:49 pm
Bosch:
You said that fundamentalist Christian leaders want to leave the Union and go to a place where the streets are paved with gold. I haven’t heard any of the secessionist people saying anything about leaving the Union to go to Heaven. To me, while it a may have been an attempt at humor, this is a belittling of Christian fundamentalist. To me prejudice and intolerance aren’t much different.
I Rule You :-) / You Whine :-(
May 24th, 2009
2:50 pm
On Memorial day weekend in the United States of America, two dunce liberals go to China to pay tribute to some cut throat communists, I’ve seen it all now-
Pelosi is scheduled to attend a clean energy forum in Beijing on Tuesday along with Senator John Kerry, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Other details of her itinerary were not immediately known.
Kerry on Sunday arrived in Xi’an, the capital of the northern province of Shaanxi, where he was holding official meetings and visiting the country’s famed Terracotta Warriors, Stevenson said.
What a couple of bozo’s.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
3:02 pm
Hillbilly Deluxe,
Come on, you know it was meant as a joke. Why do you feel my joke was belittling Christian leaders when, in my experience, that is a pretty accurate description of where they feel they will go when they die? Are we going to be all literalists now? That will make for a very boring blog.
DebbieDoRight
May 24th, 2009
3:32 pm
Whine too funny!!! ——-> Score one for the Dick.
You forgot to add head at the end of that sentence!!!
anonymous
May 24th, 2009
3:44 pm
It seems as if the university is simply refusing to officially recognize the club (which probably would entail some amount of university funding) rather than banning the club outright. In that case, that’s fine with me. I’m sure the club can fund itself with fundraisers instead.
anonymous
May 24th, 2009
3:46 pm
Oh, and, for what it’s worth, nobody is a bigger socialist than Jesus.
catlady
May 24th, 2009
3:50 pm
Official recognition usually comes with perqs such as places to meet, the ability to advertise on campus, as well as, funding, if requested. The thing is, the rules have to apply to all recognized clubs or interest groups, and cannot depend on race, creed, etc, etc. Saying you don’t like what a group’s parent group may espouse isn’t a valid reason to deny them recognition, absent them advocating sedition or treason or riot, or interfering with the conduct of classes or university business. Case law for postsecondary education is full of these kinds of rulings.
catlady
May 24th, 2009
3:52 pm
My 3:45 seems to have disppeared. Anyone understand why the bugs are still in this “system”, or is there…a conspiracy?
getalife
May 24th, 2009
3:57 pm
At least, the American taliban has not bombed anything.
Yet.
Taxpayer
May 24th, 2009
3:58 pm
It’s gremlin censors, catlady. They do it just for meanness.
DannyX
May 24th, 2009
4:03 pm
Right you are anonymous. Jesus was a big fat socialist known for redistributing of the wealth.
Examples. Healed the sick- no charge. Gave sight to blind man- FREE. Brought dead man back from death-FREE. Sounds like free health care to me.
Fed the hungry by pulling fish from a basket- FREE! Free bread too!
In fact Jesus could be called a party boy! Changing water into wine. PARTY! and Free!
I don’t think the government is going far enough. Its seems we have a God given right to have wine at our weddings. Are you listening Obama?
We want Wine Stamps.
N.J,
May 24th, 2009
4:04 pm
“Is there anyone out there who believes we SHOULDN’T stand up and fight the terrorists? If so let me know so I’ll know to skip past your posts.”
There is fighting dumb and then there is fighting smart. Of course fighting dumb relies of brute force, rather than the intelligent direct targeting of your the enemy, without destroying so many innocent people that you provide both a haven, and support for that enemy.
What we have done in Pakistan has virtually played into the hands of Al Qaeda and the Taliban. The form of Islam that is most widely practiced in Pakistan, is a very peacey, lovey sort or religion, because of the influences on it that came out of India…both Buddhism and Hinduism had a large role to play on the sort of Islam that developed in Pakistan. Pakistan has had its own “summer of love” similar to what happened in Haight Ashbury in the 1960’s, and it never really went away,
However a lot of people are getting pissed off as an economy that was growing, almost as fast as the one in India, has been almost completely destroyed by the American influence in that nation due to Afghanistan to the west of it. Pakistan’s homespun version of Islam is extremely different from the conservative and fundamentalist version that is practiced in Saudi Arabia, is extremely tolerant, involves a lot of music and dancing in its practice and as a result of the American presence in the region is losing a lot of traction as a lot of people start rethinking the Taliban and Al Qaeda assertions that the west has launched another crusade against Islam. The Taliban has been destroying the centuries old tombs and religious house of worship that have grown up around the places associated with Sufi mystic preachers.
In 2007, the Rand corporation recommended that the United States attempt to reach out and reinforce the moderate Sufism practiced in Pakistan as a foil against the religious conservatism of those who are essentially attempting to superimpose a very foreign form of Islam in Pakistan. The interpretation of the Talban and al Qaeda is as foreign to Pakistani Muslims as Christianity is to them. Even as the Taliban destroys the most sacred shrines of their religion, the Pakistanis do not rise up against them, but rather blame the United States for them even being in Pakistan to begin with.
Just as the United States was able to counter the Soviet nuclear aresenals with smaller and more accurate weaponry, the same idea applies to the use of less brute force in that region of the world. Dozens of times the United States has targetted sites and killed dozens or hundreds of innocent people attending weddings or religious functions, stating that intelligence said that Bin Laden or Ayman Al Zawahiri were going to be there. Problem is that given the religious practices of the Pakistanis, their rather tolerant and totally non austere practices, there is no way in hell that any member of the Taliban or Al Qaeda would be seen in such a place. More likely that the Taliban and Al Qaeda planted this information on their own, so Americans would target innocent Pakistanis and so outrage the general public over America’s support of dictatorial leaders, or outright attacks within Pakistan proper:
Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, the descendant of a famous mystic and the keeper of his shrine, speaks often of the need to promote Sufism over extremism. But there has been little sign yet of a sustained effort by the government to reach out to the Sufis as allies or highlight how far out of step the extremists are with the country’s religious mainstream.
“If you want to understand the inclusiveness and tolerance of Islam, you have to visit the shrines of Sufis,” Qureshi said. “I believe that if you want to counter terrorism in long term, the strongest weapon is not the Kalashnikov, it is education, it is a changing of hearts and minds.”
Even with their shrines under attack, Sufis are not rising against the militants or even loudly criticizing them.
Some of this silence is attributed to fear. The Taliban are known to terrorize and kill opponents. Many people also complain that the security forces would not support them if they put their necks on the line.
Another reason is that for many ordinary Pakistanis, anger at the Taliban is offset by anger at the U.S. for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that many here view as directed against Muslims. Experts also note the Taliban are primarily a political movement, not a religious one, despite how they may present their struggle.
http://www2.journalnow.com/content/2009/may/24/pakistans-moderate-islam-is-under-fire/news/
As usual the Republican methods of using blunt force, rather than delicate surgery to remove the tumor of extremist Islam, is causing more harm than good.
The “Qureshi” mentioned above is the descendant of one of Pakistans greatest Sufi mystics, one of the creators of Pakistan’s tolerant, mystical form of Islam. He is also a minister in the current Pakistani government.
We do not even have to fight the Taliban or Al Qaeda. Muslims would do it themselves if Bush had not fallen into the trap Bin Laden set for him. Attacking the United States on 9/11 was not the purpose of Al Qaeda. Goading the United States into attacking the Muslim world, by attempting to take over countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, and attempting to superimpose western ideas onto these countries was the goal, and largely it has been accomplished. All Bin Laden needed to do was something that would result in Western, nomininally Christian troops, occupying nations that had Muslim majority populations. This, he accomplished.
DB, Gwinnettian
May 24th, 2009
4:11 pm
Still waiting for an example–any example–of a Republican club being disowned by a university, anywhere, while the Democratic club is allowed to continue.
Eddy
May 24th, 2009
4:15 pm
Karma is best served warm! Liberty is a start. In chorus now…..Whine, whine, whine.
Dusty
May 24th, 2009
4:22 pm
Dear @@ and Catlady,
My post around 3:00 also disappeared. I reported it to “technical” which sent me the name of who handled their “technical” and where it was sent. Big help! Why they didn’t they just say “outer space”?
In the meantime I see “N.J.” sent a 14 paragraph post without a hitch. Makes one wonder…
I Rule You :-) / You Whine :-(
May 24th, 2009
4:22 pm
The key to premium yard bird is thoroughly slow cooking it at 275 degrees, indirect heat, Weber gas grill, for at least 90 minutes.
Any old sauce will do.
Excellent!
Dave
May 24th, 2009
4:27 pm
Way to go LIberty!!!! It’s about time someone stands up to the democrat liberal war machine.
clyde
May 24th, 2009
4:33 pm
Debbie @ 3:32
I had exactly the same thought.Of course I’m too demure to to send it in as a post.And too lazy.
DB, Gwinnettian
May 24th, 2009
4:36 pm
Clyde:
Given that Cheney’s been on the tube a lot of late, the regulars were having a lot of fun with “Dick in a box” over at Atrios’ joint.
(If you find such things funny. Which I don’t. Nosirree.)
DB, Gwinnettian
May 24th, 2009
4:38 pm
I kinda wish there were a spam filter for posts that complain about their posts being eaten for ideological reasons.
Kamchak
May 24th, 2009
4:39 pm
Smoke with apple wood, and no sauce needed.
Rick
May 24th, 2009
4:41 pm
Isn’t that the same logic as the Ivies keeping ROTC off campus? I never hear the journalist commenting harshly upon those schools! Do you?
DB, Gwinnettian
May 24th, 2009
4:43 pm
Rick, the ROTC isn’t a political party.
Gotta run, but if you’re in the mood for a laugh, there’s a new translation up at Bobblespeak.
mike
May 24th, 2009
4:58 pm
DB –
“Still waiting for an example–any example–of a Republican club being disowned by a university, anywhere, while the Democratic club is allowed to continue.”
Well, it doesn’t rise to the level of the Liberty example but:
“WHEN CONSERVATIVE columnist Don Feder spoke at UMass-Amherst last month, his speech was cut short by a large group of students whose noisy and disruptive antics drove Feder off the lectern midway through his speech. As one UMass student wrote after the event, “I am embarrassed of the way my fellow classmates have chosen to express their discontent.” She should be – but she should also know that she is not the only one who is due for some embarrassment.
America’s campuses are seeing a growing movement by students to shut off debate by organized groups and silence speakers with whom they disagree. Rather than engage in the give-and-take that should be characteristic of the university as a “marketplace of ideas,” these students have decided that opposing views don’t even bear hearing. And all too often they are aided by administrators whose policies reward hecklers rather than students who wish to engage in civil debate and dialogue.
UMass is one of those campuses. After word got out that students were planning to protest Feder’s speech, the UMass-Amherst Police Department pressured Feder’s hosts, the Republican Club, into paying nearly three times as much in security costs for the event as they had planned. Of course, the student hecklers disrupted the event anyway with no interference by the police.
Feder’s hecklers were thereby handed a double victory by the university – not only did they manage to silence Feder, but they also succeeded in forcing their political enemies on campus to pay a huge security bill for little return. This tactic was so successful it’s hard to imagine that the same UMass students won’t do it again, and it’s unlikely that the lesson has been lost on students who sympathize with Feder.”
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/04/09/why_no_one_should_be_silenced_on_campus/
mike
May 24th, 2009
5:02 pm
DB –
What’s your point? That conservatives are more intolerant than liberals? Don’t the posts on this blog indicate that neither conservatives nor liberals have any high ground when it comes to intolerance?
Bud Wiser
May 24th, 2009
5:10 pm
I like Redneck Convert.
His sarcastic manner is well disguised and his play on words is, well, admirable. I enjoy reading him and trying to figure out what he really means, because many times his slant is much like a blast of buckshot; it scatters out at first, but something always finds the target.
He’s cool.
I, on the other hand, deploy the more straightforward approach, knocking through the crap right from the start, and use sarcasm some, but mostly pulverizing the prey with facts and statements, backed up, with the intention of making the victim squirm with anger and/or fear. It’s sort of like wounding the bleating animal, then standing with a foot on its neck while I openly deride it before putting it away.
The wounded bleat, curse, and hurl vile insults, but the end result is always the same. They are done, cooked in their own stupidity and blind partisanship. Then I toss them into my own creation, “The Irrelevant Pool”, occupancy unlimited.
I hope everyone enjoys their long weekend, and uses it to not only think about what the holiday means, but what and how our service men and women all over the world are going to be affected by the lack of leadership we have now, from a President who bows to foreigners, to a Speaker who openly and defiantly attacks and lies about our intelligence gathering community, the one part in the cog of our safety net, the military, that we simply cannot continue to function without.
Kamchak
May 24th, 2009
5:10 pm
Don’t taze me bro!
georgian by birth floridian because I'm lucky
May 24th, 2009
5:21 pm
Didn’t Jay ban and kick off a poster who used to act like an Islamic extreamist?
Basically the guy acted like he was muslim and then made comments of satire and sarcasm, but was kicked off by Jay for I believe something along the lines of racism?
I may be wrong but if I am not can anyone tell me why that poet was kicked off?
mike
May 24th, 2009
5:29 pm
Bosch –
“If you were to ask 100 fundamentalist what they think heaven will be like, I think you will find 100 of those will tell you something very similar to what I described. Arguing for the sake of arguing is rather futile.”
First of all, have you ever spoken to a fundamentalist Christian?
Second, I think if you asked 100 fundamentalist Christians as to what heaven is like, few, if any would describe “streets of gold” and “angels singing”. You are describing what heaven looks like in cartoons. The evangelical Christians I know would describe being at peace and being with loved ones. I don’t think any of them would be focus on the aesthetics.
mike
May 24th, 2009
5:34 pm
Can we all agree that the software that powers this blog is atrocious?
I Rule You :-) / You Whine :-(
May 24th, 2009
6:16 pm
Orange alert!
“I think Rush articulates his point of view in ways that offend very many,” Tom Ridge said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
“It’s a matter of language and a matter of how you use words. It does get the base all fired up and he’s got a strong following. But personally, if he would listen to me and I doubt if he would, the notion is express yourselves but let’s respect others opinions and let’s not be divisive.”
I hear that Spectre is looking for some new friends.
Tom, Arlen. Arlen, Tom.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
6:18 pm
Yeah mike, I have spoken to a fundamentalist Christian – I talk to my mom at least once a week. My mother-in-law lives with me and she talks about those streets of gold all the time, and on Sunday mornings she watches all those church shows and I hear that spoken quite often blarring from the TV in her room (she’s hard of hearing, so she turns it up real loud – maybe she’s worried about my soul and wants me to hear it).
I wish Hillbilly Deluxe was still here. I just took a hard core nap and I had a dream about something that was relevant to our prejudice vs. intolerance discussion.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
6:20 pm
mike,
And ya’ know what? Grape popsicles are really good. Really, no joke.
Ray
May 24th, 2009
6:29 pm
Some parents of South Cobb High seniors were unable to attend Saturday’s graduation at Roswell Street Baptist Church in Marietta because the sanctuary was filled to capacity.
The culprit: counterfeit tickets.
Once again, the liberal AJC has a problem with unregulated free market?
SOMALIDAWG
May 24th, 2009
6:29 pm
برابر یکدیگر با روح برادری رفتار school liberal very veryبا هم برابرند، همه دارای اندیشه و وجدان همهٔ افراد بشر آزاد به دنیا میآیند و از دید حیثیت No conservatives.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfIUZaThRk4&feature=related
SOMALIDAWG
May 24th, 2009
6:29 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfIUZaThRk4&feature=related
mike
May 24th, 2009
6:32 pm
Bosch –
Oh so your contempt for Christians stems from family issues. Nice.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
6:36 pm
mike,
Nope, not at all. You asked me if I had ever talked to one, and I mentioned two. I grew up in a fundamentalist church, and I talked to the folks there all the time. I still talk to some of them.
And nice of you to put words in my mouth, that I’ve never spoken nor even written – contempt? Nope, considering I’m a Christian myself, and my immediate family, I have no contempt for any of them, or myself – I rather like all of us – we’re a good bunch of folks.
Lime popsicles are the best, but grape ones, I’ve found to be rather delicious, do you agree?
catlady
May 24th, 2009
6:38 pm
Since I tend to agree with Jay, I doubt my posts are lost for ideological/political reasons. I also get lost over on Get Schooled, and on blogs where I do have sharp ideological differences. It is just a sorry host/server thingy. (Kind of like the software my school uses which has to be fixed repeatedly and then still cannot spit out correct information. We’ve even been encouraged to give it a break and enter fewer grades!) I guess they got this new thing to get rid of the repeated postings, but I think this is worse. How many more complaints are necessary for the AJC to go with something more dependable? Or does it matter if folks are dissatisfied? Can I get my money back for this free blog? They already don’t deliver the paper any closer than 50 miles from here.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
6:38 pm
mike,
And maybe you missed the part of my post where I wrote where I hear that blarring from the church shows on the TV in my mom-in-law’s room.
mike
May 24th, 2009
6:38 pm
Bosch –
Oh yes. Your sneering comment that started off our discussion demonstrates your contempt.
You never explained what the “Hehehehe” intro to your comment was supposed to mean if it was not mockery. Care to try again.
I prefer grape popsicles myself.
mike
May 24th, 2009
6:39 pm
Bosch –
No I didn’t miss that at all. It really doesn’t have much to do with anything though.
catlady
May 24th, 2009
6:39 pm
I mean, in order to get a daily paper on the day it is printed I have to buy a CHATTANOOGA paper, for Goodness Sakes!
mike
May 24th, 2009
6:42 pm
catlady –
I actually worked for Cox Interactive years ago and the forum software we used then was much better than this current system.
The fact that the AJC can’t get basic technology like blogging software to function probably definitely taints their pundits groaning about the incompetence of others.
SOMALIDAWG
May 24th, 2009
6:44 pm
برابرند، همه دارای اندیشه و Catlady–CHATTANOOGAافراد بشر آزاد به دنیا میآیند و از دید حیثیت AL CAPONE FROM IS??
وجد
ان
getalife
May 24th, 2009
6:49 pm
Yeah Andy,
Powell and Ridge are the only two gop to stand up against a radio entertainer and the worst VP in history.
The gop are weaker than the spineless dems.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
6:51 pm
Well it appears the blog gremlins got one of my posts too.
mike
May 24th, 2009
6:52 pm
getalife –
You claim that the Iraq War was an attempt to intentionally exterminate all Iraqis. How can you applaud Powell when he refuses to condemn the genocide that you claim?
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
6:56 pm
mike,
I think you read what you want and ignore the rest, which in most cases is harmless, but when making accusations, it is rather important, no harm there, but please, contempt? That, like “intolerance” is rather strong language.
Considering I’m a Christian myself, then no, I do not hold contempt for Christians. Nice way of putting words in my mouth, when nothing can be further from the truth. I’ve written quite extensively my opinions about Christianity on this blog, and if you have a few hours, I can write a manifesto. But considering I just switched from grape popsicles to bacon sandwiches and beer, I’m not up to it – if you’d like to ask a specific questions regarding my beliefs, then please feel free to do so. Otherwise, I’m going to enjoy my Heineken.
mike
May 24th, 2009
6:58 pm
Bosch –
Well, how about answering my question as to what the “Hehehehe” intro to your comment was supposed to mean if it was not mockery?
getalife
May 24th, 2009
6:58 pm
mike,
He was man enough to admit it was a mistake and got punked by the intell. He told w that if he broke it, he would have to fix it . A lone voice of doubt.
mike
May 24th, 2009
7:01 pm
getalife –
“He was man enough to admit it was a mistake and got punked by the intell.”
So you are saying that Powell said that he was intentionally deceived?
Kamchak
May 24th, 2009
7:02 pm
Bosch
Now that the English Premiere League season is over, how are your sons settling their differences between Chelsea and Liverpool? Any side bets being paid off?
getalife
May 24th, 2009
7:03 pm
duh mike.
mike
May 24th, 2009
7:07 pm
getalife –
“”George Tenet did not sit there for five days with me misleading me. He believed what he was giving to me was accurate. … The intelligence system did not work well,” he said.”
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Politics/story?id=1105979
duh indeed.
Bosch
May 24th, 2009
7:10 pm
mike,
Oh, that was in the post that got dropped, sorry. When I type “hehehehehe” in front of something it is not meant as mockery, it is meant that what follows is an attempt at humor. And my beliefs on Christianity, or more specific, fundamentalist Christianity, does not stem from family disputes, for I love my mother (my mother-in-law? welllllll…… that’s another story). I grew up in a fundamentalist church, which resulted in several years of childhood therapy based on some rather unpleasant personal experiences I endured. I left the “church” for many years and became rather hardened towards all organized religion based on my experiences. But, alas, I met the other Bosch (who is a seminary graduate) and was convinced rather reluctantly to go to another church and try another “branch” of Christianity – which has really helped me grow as a person. Man, what people do for love. But it worked for me. So that’s a good thing.
That bacon sandwich was delicious (it was no grape popsicle, but close), and my Heineken is also quite good. So, do you have anything specific you’d like to ask about my spiritual belief system? I’m really no good right now for a complete “Bosch’s Views on Christianity” manifesto.