A little double dose of travelin’ music

OK OK, I apologize for that. I dun y’all wrong. Please forgive me. As partial redemption for polluting your brains like that, I offer a cleansing by the great Drive-By Truckers.

I used to go hear them before they were anybody, back when Jason Isbell was still with them, down at the Star Community Bar — or maybe it was across the street at The Point, back when there was The Point, which sounds like a bit of accidental philosophy, which maybe it is, but I digress — anyway, they were great fun, and I hope you forgive me.

225 comments Add your comment

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:07 pm

Yeah, that’s real nice, some worshipping of the Golden Calf and taking the Lord’s name in vain, sweet.

A twofer, if you will.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 1st, 2009
5:12 pm

A great voice was silenced the other day. Rest in peace, Vern.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWl9IuDeQWc

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:14 pm

Whiner, does a single shaft of sunlight ever penetrate your darkness?

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:18 pm

bookman, perhaps you haven’t seen the top of the second screen capture, some of us find it just a tad offensive, to say the least.

But of course it’s my fault.

jt

May 1st, 2009
5:20 pm

I think I saw them @ the Chameleon. Back then…………

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:20 pm

Doesn’t it figure, the libs have vapors should dare to criticize their mere mortal TelePrompter Reader, but are at a loss to comprehend their own blasphemy of the Holy Trinity.

sigh

jt

May 1st, 2009
5:21 pm

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:26 pm

Personally, Whiner, I think there are many ways to blaspheme. Professing deep faith in Jesus while showing not a shred of charity or kindness might be another.

But what do I, a godless liberal, know about such things.

Have a good weekend.

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:29 pm

It really is pretty sick, I can clearly remember the great pains and verbal gymnastics this raggedy paper employed to avoid touching the Danish Cartoon Broohaha, an afront to Christianity, eh, no problemo.

I wonder if it has anything to do with the Urinal being skeered of the cut throat savages of Islam, you reckon?

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:32 pm

Oh yeah, the non taxpaying and 2% of their income to charity democrats are going to assume the lack of good works for others now, eh?

That’s unique.

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:35 pm

We only know you by how you behave here, whiner.

And here, there’s a great gap between what you profess to be and what you show yourself to be.

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:38 pm

Oh no, I’m a sinner because I don’t embrace gay marriage or abortion.

Are you sure about that?

Kamchak

May 1st, 2009
5:39 pm

The lady protests too much, methinks.

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:40 pm

I said nothing of the sort. I’m not talking political stances. I’m talking about the well of bitterness that you seem to draw from for each and every post.

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:43 pm

I wonder if it has anything to do with the Urinal being skeered of the cut throat savages of Islam, you reckon?

I need to expand on that a little, it’s funny how us Christians are just itching to waste whoever disagrees with us but yet the libs can impugn us with abandon and never seem to suffer any terrible harm, hahahaha.

But be careful how you speak about those peace loving Muslims!

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:48 pm

Each and every post is usually political, hence the animosity. Other than that, I’m usually quite cheerful.

Seriously.

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:48 pm

And right on cue, you prove my point so well. Back into that well…

Do you wish the video to be removed?

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:52 pm

Is there a different screen shot of the same song? The AJC surely has some Photoshop software, don’t they?

hahahaha, see, cheerful.

Taxpayer

May 1st, 2009
5:53 pm

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:53 pm

Do you want the video removed?

Jay

May 1st, 2009
5:56 pm

And whiner, I can safely say I recall not a single post by you that might honestly be described as “cheerful.”

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:59 pm

I’m not the only Christian in the United States, Jay.

I leave the decision to you, it is not my blog.

ty webb

May 1st, 2009
5:59 pm

Jay,
I’m offended by the reference to gang violence in the name “drive by truckers”. I thought you would be for more gun control, and against anything referencing gun violence. Just joking. Good band.

Kamchak

May 1st, 2009
6:08 pm

Mr. Bookman

Simply put a parental advisory warning up the next time and then we can call Andy the Tipper Gore of the internet.

Jay

May 1st, 2009
6:08 pm

Then I’ll await further feedback….

Pending that, have a “cheerful” weekend.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
6:15 pm

You libs better check on Obozo, I haven’t heard of any gigantic gaffes or total idiocies from him today.

You sure he’s alright?

Midori

May 1st, 2009
6:16 pm

I leave the decision to you, it is not my blog.

how profound.

how utterly profound.

Susan Myers

May 1st, 2009
6:20 pm

I guess the people who need it most are the ones going to church, I give them credit for that. Now, if only they’d read, learn and pay attention to the words of Jesus, who they claim as their Savior.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
6:33 pm

Oh good, now’s the part where the baby killers tell us what bad Christians we are.

sigh

LAB

May 1st, 2009
6:33 pm

I would never have known that I Report/You Whine is a Christian.

Ray

May 1st, 2009
6:34 pm

Bookman,

Whiner is no different than all of the lib bloggers on this site. There has not been many rays of sunshine from them over the last year or so. How can you expect decent comment from all of those that post when all you do is fan the fires of discontent then sit back and watch the fireworks? Sort of like Sharpton, wouldn’t you say? People like Midori, Ms G, Taxpayer, Copyleft and worst of all GMan seem to thrive on negative rays of sunshine on a daily basis. But you have never in all the time that this blog has been on line had any negative things to say about their trite, sarcastic rhetoric. If you don’t want negative “rays of sunshine”, back off on your partisan rhetoric. You can’t have it both ways.

Jay

May 1st, 2009
6:35 pm

Gee, you try to create a little “demilitarized zone” with a music video and where does it end up?

Midori

May 1st, 2009
6:35 pm

LOL,

Speaking of negative “rays”

:lol:

WhoCares

May 1st, 2009
6:36 pm

I think I missed something here? Was there a picture or a video that was above the text?

Taxpayer

May 1st, 2009
6:37 pm

There is no such thing as a negative ray of sunshine. Why, that’s just dark.

Taxpayer

May 1st, 2009
6:38 pm

You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension. A dimension of sound… a dimension of sight… a dimension of mind. You are moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas. You’ve just crossed over into… The Cheerful Zone.

Imagine for a moment, if you will, a world turned upside down. A world where gloom and doom are transformed into cheerfulness. Picture this. I Report/You Whine no longer speaks of the horrors wrought on his very being by the relentless and terrifying leftist attacks from the ‘urinal’.

Who am I kidding.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
6:44 pm

bookman, just because you libs whined and moaned until the Ten Commandments were banished from sight is not a good reason to act clueless.

This isn’t Reverend Wright’s church, is it?

Ray

May 1st, 2009
6:45 pm

Bookman,

You remind me of Miss Piggy. MOI? Why, I have just been a facilitator of political comment, not an enabler of partisan rhetoric. Copyleft says that this is an editorial page, so you have the right to do about anything that you want. As long as the lemmings gather behind you and defend what you do, you will continue to have people like Whiner and me chastising you for it, and sometimes not in the best of language. I repeat, you can’t have it both ways.

RW-(the original)

May 1st, 2009
6:48 pm

Who Cares,

Once you post a comment Jay B’s portion of the post goes away.

Except on this one where he seems to be spamming his own blog.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I’m fully against censorship so I wouldn’t be for pulling content, but it’s also true if something offensive to a Muslim was posted here it would be pulled and thrown down the memory hole at the first hint of a complaint on religious grounds.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
6:54 pm

“The NCNA will be a dynamic, forward-looking organization that will amplify the common-sense and wisdom of our fellow citizens through a grassroots dialogue with Republican leaders,” the organization said in a letter announcing its formation.

The group is spearheaded by House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia, the leaders are the top Republicans in Congress and their “national panel of experts” is made up of Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and former Govs. Jeb Bush of Florida and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts.

Why McCain, y’all?

Why am I the sole remaining Republican who can see what a total ringmeat this guy is?

Remember how he trashed Palin after the election, right along with all of his other fellow libs?

Let’s turn him over to the team he so badly wants to reach up.

Puh-leeze.

moonbat betty

May 1st, 2009
7:16 pm

what

May 1st, 2009
7:16 pm

Tis true Bookman,

You have and would again pull anything that was possibly offensive to muslims, especially if it attacked Allah.

Why is there a difference?
Is it because youdon’t like i report/you whine?
Are you exclusive enough in your thinking to honestly feel that the opinions of christians should not be honored?

For the record I do not find the song offensive, but I do find your hypocricy to be offensive.

People do take what you say seriously and with that comes responsibility. By allowing your personal views to effect wo is allowed to be discriminated against and who cannot be is at best dihonorable at worst hateful.

You are better than this, I feel that your feeling were hurt when he called you on it, when you know the professional thing to do would just be to alter the heading of the video.

N.J,

May 1st, 2009
7:21 pm

and now for something completely different. travelling by boat music:

http://users.wolfcrews.com/toys/vikings/

getalife

May 1st, 2009
7:22 pm

ty webb

May 1st, 2009
7:22 pm

IR/YW,
I agree about McCain. I like Romney(should’ve got the nomination), Jindal, and Barbour. While I like Palin personally, the other side did a good job of painting her as dumb(Don’t think they needed much help). Poor Jeb’s fate was sealed by his inept brother.

N.J,

May 1st, 2009
7:22 pm

Meet the new liberals. After years of being trashed by the right wing, we simply have decided that since being nice and inclusive does not work, we will play the same game.

Jay

May 1st, 2009
7:24 pm

Actually, What, the phrase in question is probably just as blasphemous to Muslims as to Christians, Allah being just the Arabic word for God.

And no, I have no power to alter the words embedded in the video.

N.J,

May 1st, 2009
7:26 pm

Anyone who reads the Bible in context can only come to a single conclusion and that is that you should be applying it to yourself and not asserting that everyone else should do the same. Let those without sin cast the first stone, sort of thing.

N.J,

May 1st, 2009
7:30 pm

Yes, since Muslims consider Jesus one of their greatest prophets, accept the virgin birth, etc, they would rather be deeply offended by stuff that insults Jesus Christ himself, but thats not the same thing as offending Christians themselves for how they interpret either one of the Testements. If anyone has actually bothered to read the Quran, they would know that Jesus and his mother are mentioned more in the Quran than Muhammed, or any of the other biblical prophets. In fact most of the Quran tells the same stories that are in the Bible.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
7:36 pm

Well, except for the part where the Muslims call him allah not God.

I think they know what you meant and so do you.

~~~~~

Oh good, quran stories Mad Harris, do tell us about the part where the trees cry out oh, there is a Jew behind me, come now and kill him.

freak

Bud Wiser

May 1st, 2009
7:45 pm

I think a few people here need to belly up to a bar somewhere and take down perhaps more than a few cold ones….

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
7:48 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

“bookman, just because you libs whined and moaned until the Ten Commandments were banished from sight is not a good reason to act clueless.”

Sorry if some us do not share your belief system, and don’t feel that it is appropriate it is displayed in our secular government buildings. Go to your house of worship if you want to see that. If you are so insecure in your belief system you need to see it everywhere you go, you may need to re-evaluate.

RW-(the original)

May 1st, 2009
7:48 pm

Jay B,

If you go to the embed code and add &showinfo=0 to the end of each of the two places the URL appears it should take the info off the video screencap.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
7:51 pm

Bud Wiser,

Perhaps they already have.

Mrs. Godzilla

May 1st, 2009
7:54 pm

WAIT

I WOULD BE OFFENDED IF IT WAS REMOVED.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
7:56 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

In addition, for all your bellyaching about the text on the video being offensive, many of us find having the 10 commandments displayed in public buildings offensive. In that sense, as taxpayers, public buildings are our blogs.

Hillbilly Deluxe

May 1st, 2009
7:59 pm

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:01 pm

“Gee, you try to create a little “demilitarized zone” with a music video and where does it end up?”

No good deed goes unpunished. ~ Clare Booth Luce

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
8:01 pm

Is there anything more boring and dull than the liberals nattering on and on in perpetual mindlessness about a freaking Supreme Court justice?

If these people hadn’t shredded the Constitution so long ago, these judges would still be nothing yes or no clerks, there would be none of this “you shall..”

At least Bush had enough decency to nominate men who understood the law and not some pervert agenda.

John Adams would be aghast at the unelected, unaccountable power that these clowns have usurped for themselves.

But not in Third World America, we hear the names, we gurgle with glee, eewwwww.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:05 pm

Hillbilly Deluxe,

Nice…I love me Dire Straits

Midori

May 1st, 2009
8:05 pm

*****At least Bush had enough decency to nominate men who understood the law and not some pervert agenda.*******

Harriet Miers is a man?

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:07 pm

“Is there anything more boring and dull than the liberals nattering on and on in perpetual mindlessness about a freaking Supreme Court justice?”

Yes, right wing zealots nattering on about anything.

Midori

May 1st, 2009
8:07 pm

Harriet Miers understands the law?

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:08 pm

Midori,

That is just a small detail.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
8:08 pm

In addition, for all your bellyaching about the text on the video being offensive, many of us find having the 10 commandments displayed in public buildings offensive. In that sense, as taxpayers, public buildings are our blogs.

In a Christian born nation, the system of the law is based on Judeo Christian beliefs, you swear on the Bible and the Ten Commandments hang prominently on the wall, at least until some sissy comes along whining about it.

The Muslims would behead the sissy, should he whine, that’s why sissies attack Christians.

Know what I mean?

Midori

May 1st, 2009
8:10 pm

Doe not Miers being nominated reflect a ” perverted agenda”?

Midori

May 1st, 2009
8:11 pm

Jew Cowboy,

to match the size of his brain power?

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:12 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

Actually our system of law is based on Eglish Common Law which many historians believe is based on Sharia Law.

And this is not a Christian born country. It is a business born country.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:13 pm

Midori,

Among other things.

N.J,

May 1st, 2009
8:17 pm

Actually a large number of Muhammeds earliest supporters and many converts were Jews. Muhammeds closest advisors were also Jews who never converted. The “jews”, as translated into English from the Quran does not refer to all Jews, but two of the tribes who signed a treaty of peace and mutual respect with the Muslims and Christians of the city of Medina, and then broke the treaty and attempted to have Muhammed killed by his enemies in the city of Mecca.

With regard to John Adams, he was a Unitarian, which at his time was a denomination that did not believe in the trinity or even the divinity of Christ. He was quite a devout Unitarian:

The Religious Affiliation of Second U.S. President
John Adams

Religious Affiliation: Unitarian
Summary of Religious Views:
Adams was raised a Congregationalist, but ultimately rejected many fundamental doctrines of conventional Christianity, such as the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus, becoming a Unitarian. In his youth, Adams’ father urged him to become a minister, but Adams refused, considering the practice of law to be a more noble calling. Although he once referred to himself as a “church going animal,” Adams’ view of religion overall was rather ambivalent: He recognized the abuses, large and small, that religious belief lends itself to, but he also believed that religion could be a force for good in individual lives and in society at large. His extensive reading (especially in the classics), led him to believe that this view applied not only to Christianity, but to all religions.

Adams was aware of (and wary of) the risks, such as persecution of minorities and the temptation to wage holy wars, that an established religion poses. Nonetheless, he believed that religion, by uniting and morally guiding the people, had a role in public life.

http://www.adherents.com/people/pa/John_Adams.html

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
8:18 pm

Judeo–Christian (sometimes written as Judaeo–Christian) is a term used broadly to describe a body of concepts and values thought to be held in common by Judaism and Christianity. This tradition is considered, along with classical Greco-Roman civilization, a fundamental basis for Western legal codes and morality.

Next question?

DB, Gwinnettian

May 1st, 2009
8:21 pm

Goddamn, Whiner, you sure are whiny.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
8:23 pm

Before the Great American Sissy discovered that Christians do not behead whiners, the Ten Commandments hung on the wall of every courthouse in the land.

WASHINGTON — When the Supreme Court justices consider whether the Ten Commandments should be displayed on government property, they will do so under the watchful eyes of Moses.

The Jewish lawgiver is depicted several times in the stone and marble edifice that is the Supreme Court building, and so are the Ten Commandments. In sculpture, Moses sits as the prominent figure atop the building’s east side, holding two tablets representing the Ten Commandments. And on the wall directly behind the chief justice’s chair, an allegorical “Majesty of Law” places his muscular left arm on a tablet depicting the Roman numerals I through X.

I rest my case, hahahahahahahahahahaha, morons.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:26 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

You said our laws were based on Judeo-Christian beliefs. That may not be quite right.

http://docenti.luiss.it/pardolesi/files/2008/10/makdisi-islamic-origins-common-law.doc

SuperDave

May 1st, 2009
8:28 pm

Whiner,
You are an embarrassment to Christianity.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:29 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

Yet, you do not see how the display of the 10 commandments would be as offensive to others as your offense to the text on the video above?

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:32 pm

Especially in secular public buildings.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
8:36 pm

Yeah, Thou shalt not kill just bugs me something terrible, uh huh.

I know what’s bugging you pinkos, You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth., isn’t that funny, God knew all about people like Obozo.

Your little golden idol.

getalife

May 1st, 2009
8:38 pm

Porn Star And Potential Sen. Vitter Opponent Stormy Daniels To Launch Listening Tour.

She has my full support ;)

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:43 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

Yeah I’m sure that’s it. Perhaps while we are at it we could also have a plaque with the 8 levels of the Operating Thetan. It has just as much validity as your belief.

Of course the question is why are you so insecure with your belief system you need it to be validated by the government?

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
8:46 pm

Of course the question is why are you so insecure with your belief system you need it to be validated by the government?

Yeah, I need sodomy, homosexual marriage, abortion and all my other pathologies codified by an unelected, unaccountable Supreme Court, oh no, wait, that’s you.

never mind.

TnGelding

May 1st, 2009
8:49 pm

I Report/ You Whine

May 1st, 2009
5:20 pm

Well, it’ll be less crowded in heaven.

Bill Clinton for SCOTUS?

It’s okay with Mary Matalin, at least better than some would be. CNN (The Situation Room) clip or transcript not available yet.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:49 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

Then why are you crying about the 10 commandments not being displayed in secular public buildings?

getalife

May 1st, 2009
8:55 pm

SuperDave

May 1st, 2009
8:57 pm

Whiner
If the Supreme Court allows consenting individuals to engage in sodomy, homosexual marriage, and abortion, how exactly does that restrict your rights and freedoms under the constitution or restrict your rights to practice your religion as you see fit?

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
8:58 pm

I Report :-) / You Whine :-( ,

It’s sad you don’t have faith in our Constitution. I guess it was easier for you when Bush was using it for toilet paper.

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
9:01 pm

SuperDuh- Are you following the debate or just spazzing?

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
9:02 pm

SuperDave,

That is the inevitable hypocrisy of the Republican Party. They say they are for smaller government, less intrusion into personal lives and freedom, yet, they prove with their policies when they are in power they actually believe in the opposite.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
9:05 pm

“SuperDuh- Are you following the debate or just spazzing?”

And he feints left, he feints right, he dodges the question. I Report :-) / You Whine :-( , how does it restrict your rights and freedoms?

clyde

May 1st, 2009
9:07 pm

Now that we know what the rest of us do,please tell us why you need your religion propped up by the government.Are you afraid it may slip away if exposed to the harsh light of the day?

I Report :-) / You Whine :-(

May 1st, 2009
9:12 pm

Clyde- Don’t look now but religion has propped up our government for over two hundred years.

Try reading a book, preferably History.

SuperDave

May 1st, 2009
9:13 pm

If your religion can be forced on others through the power of government, then why is it not also right for the religion of others to be forced on you by that same government? The strict separation of church and state is necessary for the religious freedom of everyone, including Christians.

Dusty

May 1st, 2009
9:14 pm

Bookman is an anti-war, anti-Bush, anti-GOP, anti-religious liberal who makes personal comments about bloggers and censors conservatives because they do not make “happy remarks”.

He is neither gentleman nor scholar. He enjoys the support of people just like him. I am not one of them.

Mrs. Godzilla

May 1st, 2009
9:17 pm

One more

he’ll be at smythes old bar may 16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGssb5YKaNM

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
9:19 pm

clyde,

Anytime Christianity is put on the same level with all religions, or lack thereof, they cry foul. If their beliefs are so strong why must they be vaidated by secular government?

clyde

May 1st, 2009
9:19 pm

I understand about religion and the government,I’m just asking why religious people feel it necessary to have this relationship.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
9:21 pm

“Don’t look now but religion has propped up our government for over two hundred years.”

Yeah, but contributions to the Republican Party don’t count.

RW-(the original)

May 1st, 2009
9:21 pm

By the way, I tried out the &showinfo=0 code and it works just fine so don’t let Jay B off with his lame excuse that he has no control over the words on the face of his embed. He could get it off of there in 5 seconds of editing.

jewcowboy

May 1st, 2009
9:22 pm

clyde,

Because they are insecure?

TnGelding

May 1st, 2009
9:24 pm

Until Christians respect other religions they can’t expect respect for their own. I was surprised by the recent poll that showed most of them do:

http://news.aol.com/story/_a/americans-tolerant-of-religions-poll/20080623151109990001

The key is sincerity.

Add your comment