The Fairness Doctrine is still dead

Fine question, indeed. And a big contributor to the downfall of the Republican party.

• Link
• Report this comment

You’ve really done it now, Jay. Should make for some entertaining reading later. Nothing like a rainy day to take a nap.

Seems like they always have to have bogie man.

• Link
• Report this comment

Well, if Rush or Hannity or any of those new defacto leaders of the minority party want to run in the next Republican primary, they can rest assured that they have my vote. The last thing that I would want to do is suggest that Rush is a big mouth arrogant a$$ that’s just in the biz of showing his a$$ for the advancement of his a$$-kicking bank account that he has managed to amass off the a$$es of his loyal Republican minority party following. Why, it’s free-market capitalism at its finest.

• Link
• Report this comment

Bookman,
do you even understand why many conservatives think that the democrats are going to bring back the Fairness Doctrine? Let me clue you in. HERE GOES. IT’S BECAUSE DEMOCRATS LIKE NANCY PELOSI AND BILL CLINTON BRING IT UP! It’s not some “right-wing” conspiracy that somehow keeps you up at night. Get a clue Bookman because your newspaper is headed the way of the dinosaurs. And so are you.

• Link
• Report this comment

getalife,
democrats gave Bush a blank check. Get your facts straight before posting BS.

• Link
• Report this comment

I would like to thank Mr. Derbyshire for pointing out the lowest common denominator that pervades talk radio these days.

I’m also glad that liberals are showing us how to be the bigger person on blogs and discussion boards like this. No need for name calling and 5-year old insults when you’ve got the ideas on your side!

• Link
• Report this comment

I didn’t know our national debt was now 22 trillion. Is that what Rush is spewing. Well, in all fairness, that’s a lie.

• Link
• Report this comment

Jay’s theory is that all Republicans live in fear of the Fairness Doctrine, but isn’t this the 4th time in about two weeks that Jay has posted a commentary about this.

If Jay is correct then Republicans are to the Fairness Doctrine as Democrats are to Bush Derangement Syndrome. Which is more sad?

• Link
• Report this comment

AJC Communist, you are right. It is easy to make fun of Rush, but he isn’t running the party. That just makes for good ridicule.

You are absolutely CORRECT that we must be diligent about the Fairness Doctrine because Clinton and Pelosi have stated clearly that they support it. The right is being called paranoid because they want us to let our guard down. Part of our trip to minority status is that the elected GOP officials listen to the left’s criticism too much. If they are trying to deceive is, we need to ignore them; if it is their sincere belief, we just don’t care what they think.

Two thinks are going to happen next; Obama’s attempts to stimulate the economy will fail miserably, and he and the rest of the dems will be tossed out on their buts; or, these stupid gestures will work, and I’ll join the donkey party.

• Link
• Report this comment

It’s the “carny barkers” AND the holy-rolling religious nuts who’ve hijacked the Repug Party — that makes for quite a circus! Maybe they should rename themselves the “Circus Party” while they try to re-brand for 2010.

• Link
• Report this comment

GayGrayGeek,
EXPLAIN THIS!

“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” — From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

“This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” — From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

“Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities” — From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

“Saddam’s goal … is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed.” — Madeline Albright, 1998

“(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983″ — National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

“Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement.” — Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability.” — Robert Byrd, October 2002

“There’s no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat… Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He’s had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001… He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn’t have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we.” — Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

“What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad’s regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs.” — Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

“The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow.” — Bill Clinton in 1998

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.” — Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

“I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons…I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out.” — Clinton’s Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

“Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people.” — Tom Daschle in 1998

“Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.” — John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.” — John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“I share the administration’s goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction.” — Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

“Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” — Al Gore, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.” — Bob Graham, December 2002

“Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction.” — Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” — Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

“There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein’s regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed.” — Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

“I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force – if necessary – to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” — John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

“The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation.” — John Kerry, October 9, 2002

“(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. …And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.” — John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” — Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

“Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States.” — Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

“Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 – 1994, despite Iraq’s denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq’s claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction.” — Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

“As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” — Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.” — Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources — something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.” — John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East.” — John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.” — Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

• Link
• Report this comment

Tell us Bookman, how exactly does your column vary from Limbaugh’s radio show, well besides the 30,000,000 listeners you and Derbyshire don’t have?

Please explain why you never whine about Keith Blowberman or Jon Stewdirt?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

• Link
• Report this comment

Bookman,
the AJC really needs to get a new writer. You’ve obviously run out of topics. About two weeks ago I predicted what your next topic would be that day. Sarah Palin it was.

List of Jay Bookman’s topics: Rush is stupid, Bush is a monkey, Sarah Palin is a hillbilly from Alaska, The GOP is full of racists, Barrack Obama is the bestest most awesomist person in the universe, Bill Clinton is second awesomist, Capitalism is bad, Reagan was a socialist (opps you already wrote that crap), Christians are evil and Muslims are cool. Does that sum you up, Bookman?

• Link
• Report this comment

Besides which, as usual, the democrats lie-

Senators have adopted an amendment offered by Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) to the D.C. House Voting Rights Act (S. 160) by a vote of 57 to 41.

The amendment would direct that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) “shall take action to encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership.” Republicans argue that this broad language could pave the way for aspects of the Fairness Doctrine to be implemented at some point.

Fairness doctrines of different names are still Fairness doctrines.

duh

• Link
• Report this comment

You can portray conservatives as out of touch, paranoid fools all you want. You can believe your liberal redistribution policies will lead the country to nirvana. Time however is the enemy. Time will show how fanciful and empty the liberal dreams are.

The “Fairness Doctrine has been declared dead”, but like all the other illusions the mainstream media hopes to portray, the truth is in Dick Durbin’s latest piece of legislation which places limits on radio station ownership. Other legislation will soon follow. But you won’t report it.

• Link
• Report this comment

Taxpayer,
I have a knack for putting you to sleep? If you mean, your ridiculous liberal theological lies, then yes, I do put them to sleep. Don’t blame me for your lack of not having a rebuttal. If you want to debate then great, if not, shut up.

• Link
• Report this comment

Both sides voted for the war. But it was the Republicans in power at the time. Of course, it took some lil’ ole white lies to get the Dems to go along with the vote for war…

Reading through Commies comment you can connect the dots between the lies told by Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, etc, as Democrat leaders attempted to rationalize the case for war by using the bogus information given to them by the intelligence community.

• Link
• Report this comment

Clint Eastwood, probably only behind John Wayne and Charlton Heston in Hollywood icons, has this to say about political correctness. Suck on that all of you whiny girly liberal weenies!

Eastwood thinks political correctness has made society humourless.

London, February 27 (ANI): Acting legend Clint Eastwood , 79, apparently believes that political correctness has rendered modern society humourless, for he accuses younger generations of spending too much time trying to avoid being offensive.

The Dirty Harry star insists that he should be able to tell harmless jokes about nationality without fearing that people may brand him “a racist”.

“People have lost their sense of humour. In former times we constantly made jokes about different races. You can only tell them today with one hand over your mouth or you will be insulted as a racist,” the Daily Express quoted him as saying.

“I find that ridiculous. In those earlier days every friendly clique had a ‘Sam the Jew’ or ‘Jose the Mexican’ – but we didn’t think anything of it or have a racist thought. It was just normal that we made jokes based on our nationality or ethnicity. That was never a problem. I don’t want to be politically correct.

We’re all spending too much time and energy trying to be politically correct about everything,” he added. (ANI)

• Link
• Report this comment

Mike,
I also have liberal friends, but sadly, they only watch Katie Couric and Chris Matthews.

• Link
• Report this comment

Jay-if it was just a wacky rightwing rumor started by rightwing radio hosts,then why did they even have a vote? Seems like there was a call for the fairness doctrine from somewhere. Or does the left really FEAR rightwing talk show hosts that much? And do they yeild that much power?

• Link
• Report this comment

I believe there wera bout five or six of the lame brained Democrats who wanted to revive that stupidity. As far as I can tell that means that about 500 others in Washington did not. DeMint is just another HeadRush lackey and neo-con proving himself a gadfly and a huge waste of time in a time when the nation reels under enormous and legitimately critical issues.

The non neo-cons here, of course, have much fun ribbing the GOP faithful about the Once Grand Old Party’s current sorry state. And the fact that the future looks equally abysmal.

Need proof that their “base” of hemorrhaging ostriches and BushCo apologists are as intransigent as ever?

Twenty-nine percent of Republicans questioned in a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday say they are most likely to support Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for the GOP presidential nomination in 2012. Right behind the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, and well within the poll’s 4.5 percent sampling error, is former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. Twenty-six percent of those questioned say they are most likely backing the former, and possibly future, Republican presidential candidate.

Twenty-one percent of Republicans polled say they most likely would support former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, another GOP hopeful from the last campaign who may put his hat into the ring again.

Palin, Huckabee, Romney and the Louisiana Flash? THAT’S IT???

It’s awfully early of course, but I think I see Electoral Bloodbaths, Parts Trois and Quatre coming up…

• Link
• Report this comment

BD –

I forgot Al Gore’s quote:

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Again, his opinions were formed based on his years in the White House. He didn’t hold office in 2002.

• Link
• Report this comment

Bosch –

These quotes are all post 9/11:

“There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Letter to President Bush, Signed by: — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them.” — Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” — Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…” — Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.” — Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

“He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do” — Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” — Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.” — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…” — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

• Link
• Report this comment

Mike-The left has alway’s been known for short term memory loss. In fact that’s what there leaders depend on. Good fact reporting

• Link
• Report this comment

Taxpayer -

” what is this “liberal theological” crap that you are spewing, little fella.”

It’s much the same as your conservative bashing, so spare us the hypocrisy.

BTW: You have never put anyone in their place. You are the king of refusing to have a back and forth. When presented with evidence that you are dead wrong, you just pretend you don’t see it.

Kind of like when you made your brilliant observation that the total expense of $787 billion at 10% interest was $866 billion. LOL

• Link
• Report this comment