No More House Pages

On a day when the big news was the large drop in the stock markets, U.S. House leaders announced a historic change, as Speaker John Boehner and Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi shocked Capitol Hill by revealing their plans to end the House Page program at the end of this month.

It should be quickly disclosed that I started my working career on Capitol Hill as a Page in the summer of 1980, a $640 per month job which provided me with an invaluable knowledge of Congress that has certainly helped me in my job as a reporter.

It also provided me with many stories that I still tell today, thirty one years later.  It's not often that you can talk about how one lamwaker tried to make you tend flowers at the Botanic Gardens instead of working on the House floor.

Or there's the story of the Congressman who yelled up at the Speaker of the House about me, "Tip, this kid's trying to give me diarrhea!"

I was on the House floor when the Reagan budget and tax plans were passed, I rang the bells to notify House members of votes and part of my job at one point was climbing on to the roof to raise the flag over the House wing of the Capitol each day.

The experiences are ones that I will never forget - and will take up more than few pages in the book I'm slowly writing.

Over the years, I have repeatedly taken the time to chat with Pages about their own time in the Congress, and to tell them how it kept me around the Capitol years later.

And so, when the announcement came that the Page program was ending, I found myself struggling a bit with the story that I had to write.

"I am appalled," said Jonathan Turley, a well known law professor at George Washington University, who was a Page in the late 1970's.

It is a terrible decision," Turley told me by email. "I was floored."

But to others, it made sense.

"It's a smart move," one senior House staffer told me.  "It was such a liability."

It was a decision that seemed to come out of Left Field, but had evidently been fully reviewed in recent months by the House leadership.

"Changes in technology have obviated the need for most Page services," said a letter sent to lawmakers by Boehner and Pelosi, saying that where Pages once ferried documents around Capitol Hill, now those are sent by email.

"The program’s high costs are difficult to justify, especially in light of diminished benefits to the House," said the letter, citing "per-Page costs for a two-semester school year of $69,000-$80,000."

It wasn't immediately clear if that included salaries paid to the Pages, which were equal to just under $22,000 for a full year job; the Speaker's letter quoted an estimate that the Page program cost over $5 million per year.

"I am sorry to see this historic program come to a close, however, the reality is that advancements in technology have drastically reduced the need that once existed for House Pages," said Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT), one of four members on the House Page Board.

The decision comes five years after a Page scandal erupted around former Rep. Mark Foley, after the Florida Republican was found to have sent sexually suggestive messages to Pages.

While no evidence was ever found that Foley engaged in any improper behavior, the controversy caused some to wonder if the Page program should be scrapped, though Speaker Boehner's letter noted that "oversight and coordination of the program has improved in recent years."

But that wasn't enough to save it from the budget knife, as well as the scrap heap of history.

The timing of the announcement was very interesting, coming with the Congress on recess for four weeks - giving supporters of the Page program no time to rally the wagons and save it.

Pages first started officially serving the House in the 1820's. Some of them went on to become members of Congress, like Rep. John Dingell of Michigan, the Dean of the House.

Some, like Dingell, were the sons of members of Congress. I was a Page with a few kids like that as well in 1980 and 1981, with names like AuCoin, Fauntroy, Leahy and Dingell, too.

For those who share the last names of current and former lawmakers, they will always have a leg up on others in order to get a job on Capitol Hill.

That's why I feel bad for the kids who were plucked out of nowhere to serve as a Page, because that time in Washington might just propel that teenager into a career of public service.

Or political journalism, as in my case.

The move may not save that much money, but with soaring budget deficits, it likely won't be the last insider change we see in the Capitol in coming years.

Still, it seems hard to believe the kids in the blue blazers and grey slacks and skirts won't be around any longer on the House floor.

Sure, they'll still find someone to ring the bells for votes and to raise the flag each day.

But it won't be the same old eye-opening experience that a 15 or 16 year old kid would have had.

7 comments Add your comment

Independent60

August 8th, 2011
8:46 pm

I think it is a big mistake to end this program. Thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts.

BethStrickler

August 8th, 2011
9:51 pm

BethStrickler

August 8th, 2011
11:11 pm

As long as I am talking…

I think the Page Program is a good one. And I view it like NASA’s space shuttle program. Both have merit and provide intangible benefits so I would like to see them continue, but we just cannot afford them right now. I prefer that these programs get cut, rather than cuts in Head Start (yep, bleeding heart, want to redistribute wealth, liberal here – stop spending money on pages most of who probably have privileged backgrounds, and transfer the money to educate those lazy, mooching, poor kids).

NASA was able to retain many of its programs by hitching a ride in the shuttles of other countries. I think there is a similar alternate means to the end of exposing young people to Congress. Replace the page program with a college internship program. This would provide many of the same benefits at a much lower cost. To be an intern you would have to be a student at a DC area college. The interns would already have housing, they would already being educated, and they would not require the same amount of supervision. Additionally they could be part-time which fits with the reduction of the needs of lawmakers.

Finally, is it possible that it “Came out of Left field” because there is a scandal that we don’t know about??

Dave

August 9th, 2011
5:36 am

We are going broke there are so many of these programs that are just a waste of money that you can’t count them. Quite frankly I think kids hanging out with congress who are doing a horrible job is just a bad idea. We can’t have it all. Time to keep cutting to the bone. Close the congressional gym and sell off the the airplanes for congress make them fly commercial they might care more about airline safety if they might be killed in a plane crash themselves.

David Leli

August 9th, 2011
9:40 am

As witrh all “programs”, those that go away are surely replaced with one with a more “family” zeal

Don Sullivan

August 11th, 2011
9:59 am

Hi Jamie, I was an elevator in the Capitol Building in 1967 and have many stories from that time. I also thought of a book “Ups and Downs on Capitol Hill” (my second) I have many page stories too as well as Member stories. My son works in the Senate and I visit him often. Some day we should get together and exchange stories. My stories are really fun to tell at dinner parties and such. All true and pretty funny. Bob Michael, a great guy, generated many. I still see him when I come to DC. Charlie Wilson, Speaker McCormack and “Tip” during his pre Speaker days. Listen to your reports on Boortz every day. Keep it up. Don Sullivan, Marietta, GA

Don Sullivan

August 11th, 2011
10:00 am

Correction…I was an elevator operator..never an elevator!