Gang Of Six Details

The "Gang of Six" returned to life today in the U.S. Senate, unveiling a plan for $3.7 trillion in budget savings over 10 years, breathing new life into the drive to reach a bipartisan deal on the budget, which could then pave the way for an increase in the nation's debt ceiling.

Here is a rundown of some of the details that have been agreed to by the Gang of Six.

=

 

 

A BIPARTISAN PLAN TO REDUCE OUR NATION’S DEFICITS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

This bipartisan, comprehensive, and balanced plan consistent with the recommendations of the Bowles-Simpson fiscal commission that will:

 

* Slash our nation’s deficits by $3.7 trillion/$3.6 trillion over ten years under CBO’s March 2011 baseline, or $4.65 trillion/$4.5 trillion under the original fiscal commission baseline (which used the President’s 2011 budget request as the starting point for discretionary spending).

* Stabilize our publicly-held debt by 2014.

* Reduce our publicly-held debt to roughly 70% of our economy by 2021.

* Impose unprecedented budget enforcement.

 

A COMPREHENSIVE AND BALANCED PROPOSAL

The plan uses a two-step legislative process: (1) an initial bill that makes immediate cuts; and (2) a process for a second bill to enact comprehensive reform and put our nation on a stable fiscal path. The plan would:

Immediately implement aggressive deficit reduction down payment

* Cut deficits by $500 billion.

Dramatically cut discretionary spending

* Cut nonsecurity and security discretionary spending over 10 years.

* Maintain investments that encourage economic growth, strengthen the safety net for those who truly need it, and preserve a strong national defense.

Carefully strengthen the solvency of our most important entitlement programs

* Spend health care dollars more efficiently in order to strengthen Medicare and Medicaid, while maintaining the basic structure of these critical programs.

* Fully pays for SGR (the “doc fix”) over 10 years.

Fundamentally reform our tax code

* Reduce marginal income tax rates and abolish the $1.7 trillion Alternative Minimum Tax.

* Encourage greater economic growth.

* Enhance the competitiveness of American businesses and workers against global competition.

* Reform spending through the tax code to eliminate investment distortions and tax gaming.

* Change the debate about taxes in America from rate levels and carve outs to competitiveness, fairness and growth.

* If CBO scored this plan, it would find net tax relief of approximately $1.5 trillion.

Strictly tighten the government’s budget processes

* Impose spending caps and security/nonsecurity firewalls.

* Sequester accounts at the end of the year to recoup any excessive spending by Congress.

* Restrict the use of emergency designations that circumvent the spending caps.

* Prevent Congress from exceeding the caps by requiring a stand-alone resolution subject to a 67-vote threshold, in order to isolate that vote to increase the deficit from any other policy items.

Reform Social Security for future generations

* Ensure 75-year solvency of Social Security and provide for a decennial review of the program to ensure it remains solvent.

* Reform Social Security on a separate track, isolated from deficit reduction – any savings from the program must go towards solvency.

AN AGGRESSIVE PLAN THAT INVOLVES THE WHOLE CONGRESS

The plan would be implemented through an open, aggressive two-step legislative process led by committees of jurisdiction and involving the American people by:

Enacting a $500 billion down payment that would secure immediate deficit savings, while establishing a fast track process for the committees in Congress to specify further savings

* Impose statutory discretionary spending caps through 2015.

* Implement numerous budget process reforms.

* Shift to the chained-CPI (a more accurate measure of inflation) government-wide  starting in 2012, along with the following specifications for Social Security: (1) exempt SSI from the shift for five years, and then phase in the shift over the next five years; and (2) provide a minimum benefit equal to 125% of the poverty line for five years. (According to CBO, the shift to chained-CPI would result in the annual adjustment growing, on average, about 0.25 percentage points per year slower than the current CPI.)

* Repeal the CLASS Act.

* Enact concrete policy changes that lock-in additional savings, including freezing Congressional pay and selling unused federal property.

* Require GAO and the Department of Labor to report to Congress on establishing a more effective unemployment insurance trigger.

Enacting a comprehensive deficit reduction plan that includes discretionary and entitlement savings as well as fundamental tax reform

* Require committees to report legislation within six months that would deliver real deficit savings in entitlement programs over 10 years as follows:

* Finance would permanently reform or replace the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate formula ($298 billion) and fully offset the cost with health savings, would find an additional $202 billion/$85 billion in health savings, and would maintain the essential health care services that the poor and elderly rely upon.

* Armed Services would find $80 billion.

* Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions would find $70 billion.

* Homeland Security and Government Affairs would find $65 billion.

* Agriculture would find $11 billion while protecting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

* Commerce would find $11 billion.

* Energy would find $6 billion and may propose additional policies to generate savings that would be applied to the infrastructure deficit or to reduce the deficit.

* Judiciary would find an unspecified amount through medical malpractice reform.

* Require the Finance Committee to report tax reform within six months that would deliver real deficit savings by broadening the tax base, lowering tax rates, and generating economic growth as follows:

* Simplify the tax code by reducing the number of tax expenditures and reducing individual tax rates, by establishing three tax brackets with rates of 8–12 percent, 14–22 percent, and 23–29 percent.

* Permanently repeal the $1.7 trillion Alternative Minimum Tax.

* Tax reform must be projected to stimulate economic growth, leading to increased revenue.

* Tax reform must be estimated to provide $1 trillion in additional revenue to meet plan targets and generate an additional $133 billion by 2021, without raising the federal gas tax, to ensure improved solvency for the Highway Trust Fund.

* If CBO scored this plan, it would find net tax relief of approximately $1.5 trillion.

* To the extent future Congresses find that the dynamic effects of tax reform result in additional revenue beyond these targets, this revenue must go to additional rate reductions and deficit reduction, not to new spending.

* Reform, not eliminate, tax expenditures for health, charitable giving, homeownership, and retirement, and retain support for low-income workers and families.

* Retain the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit, or provide at least the same level of support for qualified beneficiaries.

* Maintain or improve the progressivity of the tax code.

* Establish a single corporate tax rate between 23 percent and 29 percent, raise as much revenue as the current corporate tax system, and move to a competitive territorial tax system.

* Require the Budget Committee to report legislation within six months that would:

* Extend discretionary caps and enforcement mechanisms through 2021.

* Ensure Congressional action to reduce the deficit if the debt-to-GDP ratio after 2015 has not stabilized.

* Review total federal health care spending starting in 2020 with a target of holding growth to GDP plus one percent per beneficiary and require action by Congress and the President if exceeded.

* Achieve program integrity savings of $26 billion in entitlement programs to curb fraud, abuse, and other wasteful spending government-wide.

* Create a working group to provide updated budget concepts for CBO and OMB.

* Provide expedited floor consideration for a consolidated bill meeting these instructions:

* If any committee fails to report entitlement program savings, impose across the board cuts to programs in that committee’s jurisdiction as necessary to achieve the required savings. To protect programs that benefit low income families, exempt from across the board cuts those most in need.

* Allow a group of at least five senators from each party to introduce a resolution in lieu of the non-reporting committee.

* If a resolution receives 60 votes on the floor, those recommendations will be added to the comprehensive bill.

* If the Senate does not agree to those recommendations, the comprehensive bill cannot come to the floor under the special procedures established in the first (down payment) bill.

* Bar substitute floor amendments that upset the revenue/spending balance or any amendments that make the deficit worse, but place no other limits on debate or the substance of amendments.

* Allow the Majority Leader and Minority Leader to limit debate and the number of amendments, or impose other substantive restrictions by agreement, so that the Leaders can manage the bill with a process that satisfies 60 Senators and the process cannot be held up by a small group on either side. If the Leaders cannot agree, the bill is considered under the regular order.

* Hold any such comprehensive bill that receives 60 votes at the desk pending consideration of the Social Security bill.

Enacting Social Security reform if the comprehensive deficit reduction plan has passed

* Consider Social Security reform, if and only if the comprehensive deficit reduction bill has already received 60 votes.

* Reform must ensure 75-year solvency of the program and provide for a decennial review to ensure it remains solvent. Any savings from the program must go towards solvency, not deficit reduction.

* If Finance fails to report Social Security reform meeting the instructions, allow a group of at least five senators from each party to introduce a resolution with recommendations that meet the committee’s instructions.

* Bar substitute amendments that worsen the solvency of Social Security.

* Combine any qualifying Social Security reform bill that receives 60 votes on final passage to the comprehensive bill at the desk before being sent to the House as a single bill.

* Vitiate the vote on the deficit-reduction bill if the Social Security reform bill does not receive 60 votes.

 

35 comments Add your comment

SR

July 19th, 2011
1:39 pm

Not a serious plan. The House won’t pass it and Obama will veto it.

Independant

July 19th, 2011
1:45 pm

Obama on the news now, sounds like SR may be wrong

[...] what it looks like over there according to Jamie Dupree: * Slash our nation’s deficits by $3.7 trillion/$3.6 trillion over ten years under CBO’s March [...]

Lowell

July 19th, 2011
1:50 pm

Did I miss it or are there zero cuts in the 2012 budget with this plan?

Michelle Malkin » Talking turkey

July 19th, 2011
2:03 pm

[...] this fit the bill for [...]

[...] has been seen as a sell-out and a way to force tax hikes into law with bipartisan cover. But the deal outlined today actually claims to represent a net tax cut of $1.5 trillion over ten years. It would actually lower [...]

[...] this fit the bill for [...]

Gerald

July 19th, 2011
3:14 pm

Gang of six.More of the same.Not what the country needs.We do not need more makeup on this cancer,we need an operation.A real physician no more quacks.

Blake

July 19th, 2011
4:04 pm

Usual D.C. crap. “The plan is going to do this and this and this …” but never actually says HOW any of this is going to happen.

SkyePuppy

July 19th, 2011
4:09 pm

We have deficits over $14 trillion, and this is the best they can do?

“Aggressive” deficit reduction of $500 billion? Average cuts of only $370 billion per year for 10 years?

This plan is like taking a teaspoon to the ocean and thinking you can lower the sea level with it.

Walt C

July 19th, 2011
4:12 pm

Let’s see, 3.6T / 10 years = 360B per year. Our deficits are 1.5T per year, so we are still faced with 1.2T additional debt per year. Times 10 years = an additional 12T in debt over 10 years.

The only thing I saw that I agree with is eliminating the AMT, and lowering the tax rates. But we still don’t seem to be including the 50% that pay no income tax, and we are leaving intact the Earned Income Tax Credit that encourages people to quick working once they’ve reached the earning limits. And any program that allows people to get a refund of more than they have withheld is patently UNFAIR to those of us that actually work for a living.

[...] Jamie Dupree at the AJC has a nice brief summary of the ‘Gang of Six Details’.  I know you’re as tired of the debt ceiling drama as I am but given that every one seems willing to sell us regular folks out, I think we need to keep on top of it.  That, and I’m getting damned close to cashing out all my money market funds and buying Loonies.  I kid you not.  I’d invest in a nice cash crop at this point if I could.  Pork Bellies any one? [...]

citizen X

July 19th, 2011
5:18 pm

This plan stinks! The GOP is using the phony debt ceiling crisis as a way to slash America’s Safety Net. They couldn’t do it any other way. And sure enough, Obama caves. The “Chained CPI” is nothing but a cut to Social Security. So much Bull$#!t! This plan talks about maintaining or improving progressivity of the tax code, but slashes taxes on billionaires to 29 percent! Tax rates were up to 90 percent under Republican President Dwight Eisenhower, and guess what, WE HAD JOBS!!! A decade of Bush tax cuts on millionaires and where are the jobs? China! The wealthy are sitting on at least $2 trillion, but not giving Americans jobs. Anyone voting yes on this regressive, TeaThuglican bill will have their head handed to them on a platter on election day, 2012.
Americans, wake up! Throw these congressmen out; they are nothing but lackeys for the the rich and the corporations.
Time for President Obama to remember what he promised us as candidate Obama. Time to take back our country. Time to take back Congress so that it represents US!

David

July 19th, 2011
5:24 pm

The cuts will never occur because the require bipartisan approval somewhere down the road. Even if some of the cuts re made, they are not enough. This is a tax increase bill only.

Hal

July 19th, 2011
5:31 pm

“* Armed Services would find $80 billion.”

Gotta love this kind of magical thinking. Like the military misplaced 80 billion dollars, maybe they’ll “find” it under the sofa cushions. What a complete crock! The only way out of this huge fiscal mess is for the federal government to spend a LOT less $.

[...] but the fact that President Obama likes it makes me nervous.Addendum: There are more details here. Michelle Malkin is unimpressed. google_ad_client = "pub-1395656889568144"; /* 300×250, created [...]

Mike G

July 19th, 2011
7:57 pm

I hope they can get a reasonable compromise. There is good commentary on the budget and Catholic social teaching at http://www.catholicurrent.com/#/.

Brian McQuestion

July 19th, 2011
7:58 pm

Yeah …. reduce tax deductions related to home ownership …. great idea … lets make sure we KILL the housing industry. Anyone remember 1986 – restriction on passive losses and depreciation led to a collapse in commercial construction and led to the devastation of the S&L business.

Does anyone in Washington understand that housing prices are, in part, based on cash flows received from tax savings. Housing prices include what home owners are willing to pay for those tax savings. Remove the cash flows from the tax savings and the price of HOUSING WILL DROP.

I am guessing that removing or reducing the deductions for home ownership will lead to another 10-20% drop in prices of housing nationwide …. great idea … gov’t agencies (Freddie, Fannie and Ginnie) were guilty of allowing the housing bubble to grow to the extent it did … here comes Congress to finish the job of DESTROYING THE ENTIRE HOUSING INDUSTRY SECTOR!!!!!

Our founding fathers were confident we the people could select representatives with honesty, integrity and intelligence to manage the nation’s affairs. I think the fathers may have had too much faith in us. Well done Congress!

dexter60

July 19th, 2011
8:02 pm

Weak comedy …this is the Congress that has not produced a budget in more than two years talking about spending limits ? fiscal policy when there is nothing ahead be borrowed money ?
Vomitus.
This govt. of vandals is already bankrupt.

AMTbuff

July 19th, 2011
9:01 pm

No spending cap as a percentage of GDP? Without that, this plan is just a temporary patch.

The correct plan is to means-test benefits as aggressively as necessary to achieve balance at 21% of GDP total spending. No more benefits to the non-poor unless they fit within this cap. Middle class benefits will have to compete with other priorities.

Dina Hayes

July 20th, 2011
1:55 am

Once again, we protect the rich and punish the middle class and poor. No matter who is in office, America only exists to protect the rich and it will never change.

R. Chandler

July 20th, 2011
2:29 am

“Review total federal health care spending starting in 2020 with a target of holding growth to GDP plus one percent per beneficiary and require action by Congress and the President if exceeded.”

“GDP plus one percent PER BENEFICIARY” Aren’t there, like, 50 million beneficiaries? This would mean the target for growth would be “held” to not more than 50 MILLION PERCENT increase. Nice going gang of 6 (7?). And they would only start trying for this target (like all the other targets previous congresses have set) nine years from now. Meaningless. Get the Fed Govt. OUT of health care. Allow health ins. across state lines and make it a voucher program, the market will solve this.

[...] LINK: ‘Gang of Six’ Plan Cuts Corporate Taxes, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid [...]

[...] Gang of Six Reemerges With a Plan to Curb Debt by $3.7 Trillion (Politico, AJC) [...]

Joseph Maqloney

July 20th, 2011
9:27 am

Thiese details are for the most part open-ended much like the Health Care Law. If passed by congress it would give President Obama, and Informationand Regulatory Czar a free hand at the real details.

Gadema K. Quoquoi

July 20th, 2011
10:08 am

De Gustibus

July 20th, 2011
10:30 am

Can anyone clarify(definitively) whether or not the Gang of 6 planned cuts to SS will affect those CURRENTLY on SS?

Michael C

July 20th, 2011
11:14 am

Can someone let us know what the assumptions are? The last 10 year plan had an assumption of 4% economic growth per year over the next 10 years which is a joke. I think this plan has the same assumptions thus it is not a plan at all but another deficit plan…I assume the press won’t ask or reveal this information???…

[...] what the “Gang of Six” senators, with Georgia’s Saxby Chambliss as one of their front men, proposed [...]

idontwannaeatit

July 21st, 2011
11:44 am

a bitter pill to swallow. A taste no one will enjoy yet it is the only way to slow Americas decay.

readervoter

July 21st, 2011
3:01 pm

Vague but at least it kicks the can down the road in the right direction. As usual it relies on the integrity of the detail-creators, a rather iffy trait to rely on.
Hal (”magical”) and Maqloney (”open-ended”) have it right.

[...] for very little spending – but the one area they did see fit to spend on was infrastructure. The Gang of Six plan calls for the following: Tax reform must be estimated to provide $1 trillion in additional revenue [...]

tl

July 21st, 2011
5:50 pm

Lots of words with no annual reduction commitments. For all we know they’ll come up with a plan where 70% of reductions are in years 9 & 10. How many businessmen invest their own money in projects with a 9 or10 year payoff.

Informed

July 23rd, 2011
8:18 am

Vote them all out in 2012 and lets start over.

Supportforplan

July 26th, 2011
9:04 am

I consider myself an independent. I am retired. Social Security and military retirement checks are 70% of my income. I am concern that the scare tactics being used by both sides might be true and I will loose this income for a period of time. Then I would be like federal government and can’t pay my bills.

The problem with federal government is both Republicans and Democrats have decided that it will be their way or no way. Neither side has enough of a majority to have their way so nothing is accomplished. This plan is a long ways from being perfect but at least there are 6 people in government that are working to find a solution instead of just telling the rest of us how dumb we are.

My solution would have been, instead of giving big business/banks funds to support their incompetent/greedy managers decisions. I would have used the money to rebuild in the country’s infrastructure. I would love to see some of these clowns on wall street and in congress out digging a ditch. Second, any company that outsourced jobs to cheaper labor over seas would not have any tax relief benefits.