Health Reform Setback

While many Republicans had expected a Virginia federal judge to strike a blow against the new health reform law, his ruling that a key provision was unconstitutional added new fuel to this already raging political fire.

A year ago, most Democrats and liberal-leaning legal experts laughed and scoffed at talk that the “individual mandate” could be found unconstitutional.

Yesterday, Judge Henry Hudson made clear in a 42 page ruling that he thinks the idea of forcing people to buy health insurance – and punishing them with a federal tax penalty if they do not – is outside the bounds of the Constitution.

Hudson’s ruling was simple – the individual mandate “is neither within the letter nor the spirit of the Constitution.”

The White House and Congressional Democrats downplayed the ruling, rattling off a list of court challenges so far that have not succeeded, and giving little public hint that they are worried about this one.

“We’re confident that it is constitutional,” said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs at a briefing. “And quite frankly, of the three courts that have rendered decisions on this question, two have ruled in our favor.”

That is true – two other federal courts have ruled in favor of the Obama Administration.  Now there is one against, and another one might be on the way, as on Thursday, a coalition of twenty states has their day in court down in Florida, in a case that follows the basics of the Virginia argument.

“The judge agreed with Virginia that the federal government does not have the power under the Constitution to order Virginians to buy their government approved health insurance,” said state Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli, who has become a main figure in this debate on the health reform law.

“This is a great day for the Constitution,” Cucinnelli added.  “This won’t be the final round, as this will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court.”

When will it reach the High Court?  Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum told me in late October that his best guess was during the 2012 election year – which would certain make the health care debate even more politically explosive.

One thing to remember is that while this legal battle is going on, Republicans in the Congress are getting ready to unleash a fierce attack on the law – especially in the House.

“Republicans have made a pledge to America to repeal this job-killing health care law, and that’s what we’re going to do,” said House GOP Leader John Boehner.

Almost daring him to do so was outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“In Congress, we will stand firm against attempts to roll back the law, including the Patient’s Bill of Rights and the critical consumer protections enacted by health insurance reform,” Pelosi said in her own statement.

One thing is for sure about this story – it is not going away.  It will be around in the courts and in the Congress all the way through 2011.

I remember when the Congress repealed the Catastrophic Health insurance law that was approved in 1989.  Not many people would have thought that was going to happen when it was signed into law.

We’ll see what’s next on this front.

4 comments Add your comment

Centro Salud Murcia

December 14th, 2010
5:59 am

really nice job thanks for sharing.

dentista murcia

HenryMcRandall

December 14th, 2010
4:21 pm

This ruling should prompt an all-out war for universal, single-payer health care in America. Please read “Obama’s deal with the devil gets dashed” on http://www.WRISEUP.COM.

[...] Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Health Reform Setback While many Republicans had expected a Virginia federal judge to strike a blow against the new health reform law, his ruling that a key provision was unconstitutional added new fuel to this already raging political fire (Dupree, 12/14). [...]

hsr0601

December 16th, 2010
3:17 am

1. Auto insurance mandate !

Under historical interpretations of the Constitution, Congress can dictate the economic activity of citizens so long as that activity will have profound, large-scale effects on the national economy.
 
2. Health insurance protects you PLUS all !
 
** Inaction cost, $9trillion over the next decade, ((Some of CBO analysis : While the costs of the financial bailouts and economic stimulus bills are staggering, they are only a fraction of the coming costs from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that each year Medicaid will expand by 7 percent, Medicare by 6 percent, and Social Security by 5 percent. These programs face a 75-year shortfall of $43 trillion–60 times greater than the gross cost of the $700 billion TARP financial bailout)).

Among the thirty-three industrialized countries in the world, only America has no universal health care. Why do all the leading countries require participation in a universal plan? Because every other country understands that health care is not only a basic right, it is also a necessity, a sane policy protecting the country from plagues and epidemics but also from bankruptcy by providing modern and uniform health care for its people.