The Tax Deal fight moves into a higher gear today, as the Senate is scheduled to takes the first test vote on the Obama-GOP tax agreement, which could pave the way for full Senate approval in coming days.
The vote today is on cloture – to limit debate – on the underlying tax plan that was formally unveiled last Thursday night by Senate leaders.
There will be some opposition, but all signs point to a combination of Republicans and Democrats coming together to push this plan towards a final vote by late this week.
“Despite some concerns, I also believe Americans can’t afford tax increases,” said Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). “I support, and plan to vote for, passage of the tax package.”
On Friday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) ran down the littany of more liberal complaints to this bill, as he held forth on the Senate floor for over eight and a half hours, a sort of mini-filibuster.
“I’m not here to set any great records or to make a spectacle. I am simply here today to take as long as I can to explain to the American people the fact that we have got to do a lot better than this agreement provides,” Sanders said.
He spoke mostly to an empty chamber, as only a couple of Democrats stopped by during the day to help him, Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), both of whom have expressed reservations about the Obama-GOP deal.
For those wondering, the last time we had a real filibuster was back in 1992, when Sen. Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY) held forth for 15 hours and 14 minutes on the Senate floor, protesting the move of a Smith-Corona typewriter plan to Mexico.
Just about the time that Sanders finally left the Senate floor, the Congressional Budget Office made public its cost estimate of the plan, reporting it will raise the federal deficit by $857 billion over the next ten years.
So, think about that number – $857 billion. That means there is more money involved in this plan than the controversial Economic Stimulus Law of 2009.
Yep, bigger than the Obama Stimulus. And all of it just being added to the deficit.
So far, we aren’t hearing much widespread opposition to this plan, other than from liberals and some conservative GOP Republicans, like Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), who last week told supporters that he wants a permanent extension of all of the current tax rates.
DeMint also slammed the series of “tax extender” provisions included in the bill, which include a break for “motorsports entertainment complexes.”
In other words, a tax credit for NASCAR race tracks.
I guess DeMint forgot what he did in 2007, when he sponsored S. 557, “a bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the depreciation classification of motorsports entertainment complexes.”
I know, I know. Details, details.
This tax deal will take a step forward today. For those who like inside stuff about the Congress, the vote will begin at 3pm, but you won’t see a final result until close to 6pm. Why?
Well, Senate Democrats will hold the vote open to allow Senators to fly back into town for at least two and a half hours. That should be fun to explain my editors.
4 comments Add your comment
Avery Bundren
December 13th, 2010
3:01 pm
The next thing the GOP will try to do is reduce benefits to Social Security recipients. They fought hard in the past to stop unemployment benefits while at the same time, championing the extension of tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy. Now that John Boehner will likely be the next Speaker, God knows what might happen.
Jose
December 13th, 2010
4:20 pm
Avery, take a pill for God’s sakes. They will not be a bunch of mindless monkey’s spending our money like the dems have for the past two years. And cuts to SS is out of the question so bag it for the 2012 election and then bring it out again. It will still be bogus but, what do you care?
Jim
December 15th, 2010
9:02 pm
Avery, time to put down the pipe and maybe look for the reasons of why they stopped the benefits (might have had something to do with the 500 billion the dems tied to it, maybe?) Stop with the Dem talking points and maybe try thinking for yourself for a change.
Jim
December 16th, 2010
11:07 pm
To Jamie Dupree – Great job exposing all politicians of their dirty laundry. Why should the tax payers of state A pay for a pet project of a fired senator in state M? Most of these pork butts lead the way the as to where all the campaign money came from. I am all for defending the southern and northern flanks from border issues, skirmishes, drug wars and people smuggling, but it should be up to those corporations who flood the political arena with funding for favors to anni up and support their neighborhoods from all of the leaking hazardous waste and the environmental groups to support their beaver projects, not the blood sweat and tears of blue collar America worker. If the blue collar crowd volunteers their money for said projects then fine, but remove the corporate monies out of the political campaigns and American politics will slowly come back to her roots.