During the course of the summer we’ve occasionally paused to examine just where the Atlanta Thrashers roster stood. Since we last performed such a review, we have learned of three players that will definitely not return to the lineup. Clarke MacArthur and his $2.4 million arbitration award was given a one-way ticket out of Thrasherville . Maxim Afinogenov left for the KHL, taking his 24 goals & 61 points with him. And Todd White was traded and he took his…well…he took his milk carton to Broadway.
So with that, let’s once again see where the Thrashers are in regards to on-ice personnel. But this time, we’ll concentrate on which prospects might have the best chance to make the NHL squad this fall.
Barring any other transactions, Hainsey, Enstrom, Oduya, Bogosian, Sopel and Valabikshould man the defensive corps. But that leaves one more to provide a healthy scratch in the press box. Conventional wisdom would point to Arturs Kulda to fit the bill, though some will be quick to add Paul Postma has a decent shot to make the team too. But given what Kulda showed in his few games up last winter and his play with the Wolves, Paul would really need to have a spectacular training camp/preseason to move past Arturs onthe depth chart.
In fact, I would even go so far to say that even if Rick Dudley were to pull off another deal to acquire another blueliner, Kulda probably wouldn’t be the odd man out, it might just be Boris Valabik who could be placed upon the trading blocks.
Up front… well, that’s where we could really see a battle for a couple open slots. Currently under contract are nine forwards who already have spots on the team…Antropov, Byfuglien, Kane, Ladd, Peverley, Slater, Boulton, Eager and Thorburn. Add in RFAs Little and Bergfors, whose contracts are still yet to be announced, and you have eleven of the twelve needed to ice four lines.
That would leave one more forward to dress and one or two more for healthy scratches.
Who do you think has the best shot at cracking the Thrashers lineup? (Pick three)
Total Voters: 246
Among the prospects who should have a legitimate shot at securing those spots are Patrice Cormier, Spencer Machacek, Carl Klingberg, Anthony Stewart, Fredrik Pettersson, Angelo Esposito and last June’s first round draft pick Alexander Burmistrov. Patrick Rissmiller, who was acquired in return for the milk carton, isn’t classified as a “prospect”, but we’ll lump him in as one who will be competing for a job on the NHL squad.
Of the candidates listed above, I would think Cormier enters into camp with the label of “His Job To Lose” affixed to his jersey. If he does make the team, I’d slide him between Eager and Bolts on the fourth line. Then the battle becomes which two forwards get to round out the roster.
Players like Machacek, Klingberg, and Pettersson would be considered chic picks here…certainly the look to factor into the Thrashers’ future. But unless they impress Dudley, Ramsay and Torchetti enough to displace one of the perceived starters on the team, I’d prefer to see them getting ice time with the Wolves…or Barrie in the case of Burmistrov… than observation time from the press box.
Rissmiller, on the other hand, is a good candidate for the role of 13th forward. He’s played in 182 NHL regular season games as well as 30 playoff games while with the Sharks. Plus, seeing that he’ll become 32 in October, it’s not like he requires much more “seasoning” on the farm. Anthony Stewart is a decent possibility here too given he has 105 NHL games under his belt.
And as for Esposito, well, let’s see how far his twice-torn ACL rehab has progress when training camp rolls around. I honestly have my doubts here…but Espo has youth and modern sports medicine on his side.
crossing fingers
Either way, that’s seven or so players that would be vying for two open spots…three if the team opts to keep 14 forwards. Combine that with Arturs Kulda who should be on the back line, and we could see a healthy dose of youth in the Thrashers lineup this October.
159 comments Add your comment
Your Mammy
August 12th, 2010
6:57 pm
Rawhide….Is Bob Hartley ever going to coach again in the NHL?
ben
August 12th, 2010
6:58 pm
first
Rawhide
August 12th, 2010
7:11 pm
Your Mammy – Given how long he’s been away from behind the bench, I wouldn’t think so. Of course, Bob may not even want to coach again as I’ve heard he’s gotten real comfortable in his role as hockey analyst for RDS.
GT_Thrasherfan
August 12th, 2010
7:17 pm
One problem here Rawhide, your poll is “pick three” and it spouts out an error “only pick 1″. Either way I’m voting Kulda, Cormier and a tossup between Pettersson or Burmistrov.
Darren
August 12th, 2010
7:20 pm
I like Kulda’s future as a shutdown NHL defenseman over Valabik’s at this point.
From the sounds of things from Dudley, it would take an act of God to not have Cormier on the Atlanta roster as well.
I say Machacek gets the call as the final roster player, at the moment, although Pettersson could shake things up as a 2nd or 3rd line guy. Rissmiller seems like he would be a decent 13th forward type.
Stewart sounds like a bust to me. Aside from a good showing in the AHL playoffs, the numbers say his professional career has been a big disappointment.
I’d love for Espo to show the potential he was supposed to have when Atlanta traded for him, but he wrecks his knee the same time every year, so he’s got to quit doing that first.
Rawhide
August 12th, 2010
7:34 pm
GT_Thrasherfan – Don’t know why it switched from allowing three to only one…but I reset it. Thanks.
ben
August 12th, 2010
7:51 pm
Cormier and Burmistoff
Yung JB from Montreal
August 12th, 2010
8:05 pm
Kulda for sure, Cormier cause we need tha type of guy and the last one should be Klingberg, because he is the highest rated, but id love to see Machachek, Burmistov, Esposito, Petterson. Petterson and Postma in Chicago and Rissmiller as the 13th guy. Dump Stewart
glovesave29
August 12th, 2010
8:08 pm
Cement footed Valabik must go!
Zim
August 12th, 2010
8:15 pm
When I look at the forwards, I see two positions up for grabs. The first is a bottom six center. Unless the highly unlikely occurs (young Alexander Burmistrov making the team, Angelo Esposito blows everyone away at camp, Jared Ross wins an NHL spot), the top candidate for the job is Patrice Cormier.
This option worries me slightly. I’m not entirely convinced that Cormier has the upside that Dudley and Waddell have spent the last seven months and change hyping. Can he win the fourth line center? I think so. Can he rise through the ranks a la Bryan Little in 2007-08 (started on the third line RW) to a third line man as a 20-year old? I’m not optimistic. Cormier has played only nine games since February… Is he really developed enough for a regular NHL roster spot?
The second position appears to be on the third line, most likely a RW. Not to take anything from Eric Boulton, Ben Eager, or Chris Thorburn, but I believe all three have skill sets tailored to the third line. Ideally, a young Thrasher could snag the third line winger spot and one of these three would likely watch from the press box (Boulton is a possibility).
Machacek turns 22 in October and has two years of AHL experience. In my opinion, Spencer is primed for a run at an NHL roster spot. Machacek has posted consecutive 20-goal campaigns in Chicago and has a career plus/minus of +27 at the AHL level.
The best indicator that Spencer might be ready to make the jump was his production in the AHL playoffs. The speed of the game during the AHL playoffs might be the closest to that of a regular season NHL game and Machacek put up seven goals, four assists, and 11 points in 13 games.
Dudley conceded earlier this summer that Klingberg would likely be headed back to Sweden for 2010-11. Pettersson is a wild card. 20 goals in the Elitserian is very solid production. Pettersson earned the nickname ‘Fly’ while playing with Frolunda for his pesky play and buzzing skating style. One scouting report I read claimed that Pettersson will ’shoot it from anywhere on the ice’ which is worthy quality. What does Darren Eliot say? A puck towards the net is never a bad play.
Rissmiller’s redeeming quality is his ability to play the penalty kill, but his skating and work ethic aren’t hallmarks of his game; unlike Machacek and Pettersson.
I think Machacek and Pettersson will end up battling for a shot at the third line. With Spencer’s time in the organization and familiarity with the North American game, I believe Machacek will win out. A possible third line of Andrew Ladd, Jim Slater, and Spencer Machacek has FORECHECK written all over it.
Zim
August 12th, 2010
8:17 pm
EDIT: Third paragraph should read “Not to take anything from Eric Boulton, Ben Eager, or Chris Thorburn, but I believe all three have skill sets tailored to the FOURTH line.”
World Be Free
August 12th, 2010
9:03 pm
Postma next year after the Sopel 1 year experiment. I would really like to see Cormier make the team. I like his edge, others don’t; for those who don’t have you all forgotten Todd White already?
I still see Aaron Asham here-he is a Dudley type player, just a longshot.
Sage of Bluesland
August 12th, 2010
9:11 pm
I thought our pipeline of “talent” from the minors was a gusher–according to the wittle booklets, there are many “Legends of Blueland” just waiting their turn at the parent club?
That’s the fruit of Don Waddell’s first, second, and now third, “Five Year Plan”…Thank goodness he’s still involved with the running of this organization…I just can’t imagine what we’d do without him and his expert guidance…
Rhythmpenguin
August 12th, 2010
9:16 pm
“A puck towards the net is never a bad play.”
I like it. We could have done more of that last season.
HookyBob
August 12th, 2010
9:17 pm
I’ve heard talk, or rather some articles on Dudley, that indicate he may have Big Buf on defense. That could mean we have a couple of (actual ice-time) slots up front up for grabs. For those who haven’t seen it,…
http://nhl.fanhouse.com/2010/08/02/dudley-believes-byfuglien-can-star-at-forward-or-d-for-thrashe/
There are a couple more positive articles to go with it,…
http://nhl.fanhouse.com/2010/08/09/rick-dudley-overhauls-thrashers-for-the-post-kovalchuk-era/
http://nhl.fanhouse.com/2010/08/04/rick-dudley-riffs-on-scouting-process-picking-alex-burmistrov/
Made me feel optimistic about the upcoming season. I have gotten similar “feel good” sentiments in past years,..so I’m taking this with a grain of salt.
For those who think the “sky is falling” after the Kovy contract ruling this is good reading,…
http://nhl.fanhouse.com/2010/08/11/nhls-contract-witch-hunt-is-quickly-turning-into-a-farce/
I stand by my belief that nothing more will come of the Bloch ruling.
Back on topic,..I like the idea of youth coming up and getting truely coached. I’m pulling for Postma to make the team,….but I guess that’ll only happen if Big Buf is playing forward. Seems like we have had so much potential in the minors that never gets realized.
gretchelby
August 12th, 2010
9:31 pm
If Kulda comes up I “Kulda” be a happy girl again…..I still want X back! Romper room organization…..
GaVaHokie
August 12th, 2010
9:34 pm
Postma, Cormier, Burmistrov… Need more puck movement in my book.
Brendan
August 12th, 2010
9:50 pm
I’m leaning towards Cormier and Kulda. But I must take another look at Glovesave29’s 8:08PM post. What is it, precisely, about Boris Valabik, other than his being a 10th overall, 1st round selection, that makes him such an ‘certainty’ here? Boris has never scored an NHL goal and is a minus what? … in his career. If it’s true that Dudley takes the “show me, and I’ll pay you/play you” approach, Boris better do something to earn a slot. As we’ve seen recently, we’re perfectly fine with shipping out 1st round picks out of town. Stefan (1999) went to Dallas, as did Kari Lehtonen (2002). Heatley (2000) went to Ottawa, and Hossa (2000 substitute) went to Pittsburgh. Kovy (2001) went to the Devils. Alex Bourret (2005) to the NY Rangers. Braydon Coburn (2003) to the Flyers. Why not Boris (2004), too? Would it be “too much youth” with bring up Postma and Kulda? I can’t say. I’m not qualified. But, I’m wondering what my fellow posters might think Valabik’s trade value is … out on the RFA market?
Also, is there a “love affair” with Chris Thorburn or Jim Slater? I don’t care what their contractual situation is. They don’t have NTC’s or NMC’s, so … if they’re not earning their keep, and another GM would seriously take them, then it’s worth considering a trade. And while I’m still in ‘trade mode,’ what can we get for Angelo Espsito? Look, I’ll be honest. I always am. This is not a guy who ever wanted to play here. He wanted to play for Montreal. (Still does, I imagine.) But he was a ’slider’ in his draft year, and wound up on the Penguins. (A stroke of great luck!) Through no fault of his own, he was packaged with Colby Armstrong, Erik Cristenson, and the Penguins 1st rounder (Leveille) for Hossa and Dupuis. The luck started wearing off. And then two torn ACL’s didn’t help. So, I’m asking … “what’s a reasonable return” for Esposito?
Now, I honestly think Jim Slater isn’t going anywhere. He’s the 1st round pick (2002), in Thrashers History, that might actually be here the LONGEST. Plus, I don’t think other teams have interest in him, other than as a ‘throw-in’ to help improve their cap situation.
Also, Ben Eager doesn’t seem to be ‘eager’ to be here. If so, why not trade him? And what could we get for Eager, as a ‘throw-in’ to sweeten up a deal? And finally, Ron Hainsey hits our cap for $4.5 million. Yes, that reflects a UFA contract signing from a few years ago. Here’s my thought on that. On one hand, the Octocluster has to reach the floor of the cap. So, Hainsey’s valuable in that regard. If you go swapping him out for a $2.0 to $2.75 million defender, you’ve got to take on salary somewhere else. Also, time to give Hainsey some credit, he is a Top 4 defender. So, he is filling a role for Atlanta. My second thought is … what if there’s a BETTER defenseman out there … who is paid more than Hainsey? Still with me? Well, it might well be ‘worth it’ to take on some $6 million-a-year guy from a team in cap trouble … to make the team’s defense better. But I don’t have anyone specifically in mind. And truthfully, I’d be scared to death that it’d turn into Wade Redden ($6.5 million). Hopefully, Mr. Redden has an NTC, like Brian Campbell ($7.14 million) does. There’s another way to look at Brian Campbell. It’d be like signing him for $2.64 million, if Chicago took Hainsey in the return. Trouble is … any team that trades for Campbell is stuck with him until he turns 36, six years from now, at $7.14 million cap hit. And the only way to feel good about that is … if your defense corps is less than it should be, Campbell will improve it. Immediately. Actually, rubbin’ my chin … if traded here, Campbell might want out before he turns 36. So, we might not be stuck with him. Allright, enough of that. It won’t happen, but the concept of using Ron Hainsey to trade for a better defender from a team with cap trouble … isn’t such a bad idea.
Alan R.
August 12th, 2010
10:03 pm
Brendan, you seem to have this knack to dredge up the past in such a way that is depressing in the “up the road, not across the street” sense.
Stop that.
Brendan
August 12th, 2010
10:25 pm
Alan R., we’re talkin’ about how to make the team better. I’m open to all sorts of ideas. And I think Dudley is a better judge of talent than Waddell ever was or will be. I’d love for Craig Ramsay or John Torchetti to be making out a ‘wish-list.’ Except that … Dudley ostensibly doesn’t like coaches that make requests/voice concerns over the roster. He said, “I like coaches who’ll work with the roster they’ve got and not make demands.” Or words to this effect. Dudley is clearly not gun shy about pulling the trigger on trades.
Florida’s GM just declared, last month or so, “Any player who doesn’t want to be here … we can work out a trade.” And off Nathan Horton went. I’m sure there were Panther fans who didn’t want to see him go. Oh well. I haven’t seen Dudley take this approach yet. But it’d be kinda interesting to see who steps forward to say, “Uhh, you can trade me. I’m ready to go.”
World Be Free
August 12th, 2010
10:34 pm
I see the sentimental Sage is gone, stowed away for another season or two.
You need to get on Twitter so we can get your posts quicker.
Brendan
August 12th, 2010
10:36 pm
Joe Friday, your Blackhawks just re-signed J. Hendry to a one-year deal.
World Be Free
August 12th, 2010
10:39 pm
And I think Thorny’s roster spot is in deep trouble, especially if they sign another UFA. Anyone with an edge, may just edge Thorburn to the curb. I have no issue with Chris, I just think we can do a little better. I would love to see this team run over opposing players this season, so adding another player with an attitutde would suit me just fine.
Let’s have some body checks that break glass this season, watch opposing defenseman look back as they are chasing the puck like a rhino is pursuing them. Rick Dudley hockey and Craig Ramsay accountability at both ends of the rink. Time to drop the puck.
Hokie P. Clisters
August 12th, 2010
10:41 pm
The competition for ice time is going to be a war this year. Alot of young horses in the stable. It will be be a tough call for Rammer to keep more youngsters when we are already a very young team. Rammer may opt to go with a more veteran group (Boris, Petterson and Rissmiller) at the end of camp, but the door could open real quick for Burma, Cormier or Kulda if problems arise.
Brendan
August 12th, 2010
10:42 pm
WBF, if Sage warms up to Kane and Bogosian, you might see the ’sentimental Sage’ once again. With Heatley and Kovalchuk, we never really did see them fail to live up to expectation, in terms of performance on the ice. These guys went 1st and 2nd overall. I think it’s fair to say they achieved expecations. Bogosian, 3rd overall, had an injury and a sophomore slump. Kane, 4th overall, will try to avoid the sophomore slump. If Kane has a tremendous year, you might see the Sage say, ‘the sun is once again rising on the proverbial joke known as blueland.’
Adam
August 12th, 2010
10:47 pm
Everybody keeps saying Dudley is high on Cormier or this player and that player. Every interview I’ve heard or ready says that Dudley will let Rammer & the coaching staff decide who they want on the ice. Even the article HookyBob linked about Duds thinking Buff may end up on D he says the decision will ultimately be up to Rammer where Buff plays.
I’m still waiting to see if there are any pieces added to the team before I worry about which prospects end up making the team or get their 9 game look early in the season.
Zim
August 12th, 2010
11:01 pm
WBF, is Thorburn that expendable? Only Rich Peverley (175:21) had more short-handed ice time than Chris Thorburn (173:20) on the CURRENT roster in 2009-10… that includes a surprising 7:47 on the penalty kill ALL YEAR for Andrew Ladd and just 6:06 from Dustin Byfuglien.
Thorburn has become a serviceable fourth line player with his ability to jump on the kill. Add in that Thor has put up no less than 13 points over the past three seasons (solid numbers for an average ice time of 7:40 per game in 09-10) and was a +6 last year.
The addition of Eager doesn’t make Thorburn’s roster spot up for grabs… it makes Boulton not a definite night-in, night-out player.
Cornbread
August 12th, 2010
11:09 pm
I believe Kulda is a lock for number 7 with Postma getting called up for a look during the season. I am not one to say get rid of or give-up on Valabik. He’s still young, especially for a D-man, and he is the type of player that is going to take a little longer to get to his peak due to his size. In a year or two I believe this guy is going to be a solid shut-down D-man and I hope it’s as a Thrasher. He played good smart D last year and I really don’t care if he ever scores a goal. That’s not what he’s out there for.
Byfuglien, I don’t really see him playing D. He’s not needed there – at this point. I think it’s Dudley just throwing stuff out there in the Summer and seeing if anything will stick, a trial baloon. I spoke with a former team mate of his last night and he does not see him going back to D either.
I really like the look of Machecek’s game and think he is tailored for that third line winger role that the team needs. Rissmiller certainly could fit as well but I give the starting edge to Machecek. Boults and Riss up in the box. The dark horse is Esposito. He has put on a lot of good weight. If he’s healthy, I would not be surprised to see him get the nod over Cormier. He has the skills and may be centering the third line with Slater back on fourth.
Little, Antro, Bergfors
Kane, Peverly, Buff
Ladd, Espo, Mach
Eager, Slater, Thorburn
Boults, Rissmiller
Hainsey, Oduya
Enstrom, Bogosian
Valabik, Sopel
Kulda
The rest, back in the A or Jr. and hopefully the Thrashers will be in a good and healthy position to call them up this season.
Sparky (Smoothie)
August 12th, 2010
11:19 pm
Brendan — you see my man, Dudley and Ramsay could give a flying EFF-bomb about the past. As Alan says, stop dredging it up. There are what? 35 regular posters on this blog? We all know the history of the Atlanta Thrashers quite well. You know your stuff…we get it. But I can’t read your stuff because it’s just downright depressing and pretty much irrelevant for the time being. The only thing that is relevant is how well Bogosian, Kane, Bergfors, Little, Pavelec and the Thrashawks play this fall. If the young kids don’t progress like they need to, then we’re pretty much Eff’ed in the B. Pardon mon francais.
And lastly, Sage, just piss off with your crap. We’re all sick of it and I really don’t want to have to sick Eric Boulton on your wittle pathetic butt for all of your posturing and grandstanding about crap that really has no bearing on the future of the franchise. If you really hate Don Waddell, then why don’t you go down to the CNN Center and wait for him to walk over to Chick-Fil-A and ask him to a duel. I bet he’ll beat you handily in tiddly-winks or marbles. Jesus H!
Disclaimer: I’ve been drinking heavily on a golf course in 95 degree heat and my emotions are probably getting the best of me. But I fired a 79 today at Heritage and all you naysayers can suck it.
Brendan
August 12th, 2010
11:49 pm
I cut grass in 95-degree heat, today. Does that count, Smoothie? All I’m saying is … why not consider a trade for Valabik, if it ultimately makes the team better? Or a trade of Hainsey, for example. I don’t think I’ve said anything depressing. Our team history is what it is. I didn’t create it or shape it. Notice, I didn’t say, “We’re so gawd awful, and we always will be.” Truthfully, I haven’t been looking forward to the start of a Thrashers season this much since coming out of the lockout. I think it’s right to be optimistic. I posted on Viv’s blog that there should be more buzz about the Thrashers than the Hawks. And the Hawks are coming off multiple playoff berths.
As for dredging up the past … if you don’t where you’ve been, how do you know where you’re going? I didn’t say anything inaccurate. Nor was there ‘intent’ to depress. We’ve moved 1st round picks in the past. That’s true, not false. Valabik is a first round pick. It might be worth considering, if there’s value in the return. If not, nothing wrong with keeping him and hoping for the best.
The Smooth Spark
August 13th, 2010
12:37 am
Fair enough Brendan, I was being too reactionary and I assumed that you were writing about the past without reading cuz I saw very few paragraph breaks and my drunk mind said “nooooo, I can’t handle it”. Basically I shouldn’t have been allowed near a keyboard. But I still can’t stand Sage, drunk or sober. As for your trade proposal, I’d be wary of trading Valabik just yet. Hainsey? Perhaps, but only if it gave us a good young player and some xtra cap room.
Hockey Biltong
August 13th, 2010
1:30 am
Remember; Wherever you go, there you are……
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
6:17 am
Brendan, you can’t blame Sage for his judgements of our last and the performance (and departure) of some of our high picks-the future of “Blueland”.
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
6:20 am
Zim-serviceable 4th line players are available every year. Thorburn is a not a core player, 4th line is the fringe of your club. If our penalty killing is top 5 in the league, you keep him. If not. he’s on the edge-I don’t see Craig Ramsay penalty killing when I look at Chris Thorburn. But you have a good point when referring to his number of penalty minutes.
James Brown
August 13th, 2010
7:14 am
I`m wondering if Esposito will be at full speed when camp starts…….this kid has loads of talent and potential and I hope Dudley will be patient and give him another year. I say Kulda is like Cormier and has the his job to lose jersey on too……………Brendan.I sat on my lawnmower in the shade yesterday and decided it was too hot for a 56 year old man to be riding around outside in 95 degree weather……came back inside in the ac and had a beer a read the blogs…………life is good
Sage of Bluesland
August 13th, 2010
7:27 am
“…that really has no bearing on the future of the franchise….”
Wow. If you honestly believe that the actions (past and present) of OWNERSHIP have no bearing on the course of this organization, you’re more delusional than even your words usually show!
(And that’s really saying something, too…Some never seem to learn…Don’t worry, I’ll be sure to remind you and the countless others who continue to subsidize the incompetence…and continue to hope and dream when it’s completely embarrassing…)
Next, we’ll be hearing about a magical spreadsheet that shows the ASG is really, really a good ownership group…
Rhythmpenguin
August 13th, 2010
7:44 am
I have been and continue to be a fan of Boris. He has greatly improved since he first started playing NHL games for us. Some of the stuff he did at the end of last season pleasantly surprised me (the end of his season). He still needs to improve before he becomes a regular D man for us, but with some good coaching…
Burmistrov has looked good so far. He has a chance to make the team this year of he can preform well enough at the NHL level. He is young, but he is also fast, skilled, dedicated, has been putting on weight, and is really smart (he learned a lot of English his first year in the USA).
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
7:46 am
Many of us go to games because we are hockey fans. We don’t go to games to “subsidize” anything or anyone. I agree with certain assessments of the past, but the past is the past and Rick Dudley is making the personnel decisions now. Dudley’s fingerprints are all over this club.
NHL Hockey blogs are filled with fans that question commitment of ownership and the competence of management. Sage, your comments are nothing new to hockey blogs. We can agree on the mistakes of the past, while hoping for a better future. The decision to attend games or not attend games is left up to the individual.
I am looking forward to this season, hoping to finally move forward.
Putting On The Foil
August 13th, 2010
8:30 am
Kulda, Cormier, and hopefully, Burmistrov is this years Kane. WBF-Thanks for being the only one who liked my “Buy a Thrasher’s ticket, if they don’t win, get a voucher for a free ticket to another game promo” yesterday. LOL
jimbo
August 13th, 2010
8:35 am
Zim- a checking line of Ladd, Slates and Machacek. How novel? Ramsey was often part of a shut down, checking line and I hope that we finally start playing like the rest of the NHL. Brendan- try writing spy novels. You’ve got every intrigue angle covered.
DWTOO
August 13th, 2010
8:41 am
IMHO – Kulda absolutely deserves to be here. I see him as the sixth defenseman and Boris riding the pine as cheerleader, or seventh man. Cormier has been getting a lot of publicity and will probably make the team. That would leave Machacek as the odd man as we’re strong on the third/fourth line. We need someone else who can play top six minutes. That would leave the competition to Esposito and Burmitsov. If either impress in camp think that would be the final piece. Otherwise would make a trade with a cap issued team.
Brendan – you’re very insightful and accurate, but, sometimes I too sense some negativity in your posts – as so and so doesn’t want to be here. You could get the impression no one on this team wants to be here. Granted that’s a result of the past mis-management. However, let’s hope this season changes some minds and makes Atlanta a favored place to play.
Get The Puck Out
August 13th, 2010
8:46 am
This years team will be better. Coaching to get talent out of a player that’s never been coached to show talent will make a difference. I think playoff’s will be attainable, barring injuries to key players. And really Sage – a motivational speaker would help i think…..
Putting On The Foil
August 13th, 2010
8:47 am
Buckaroo Bonzai
kracker
August 13th, 2010
8:48 am
woooohoooo!!!!
BenThrashers Thrashers prospects will start rookie camp a month from today. Hockey is in the air.
kracker
August 13th, 2010
8:50 am
Oh, they don’t go to Traverse City this year, so we can mosey on over to DIF to see the kids. See if Burma has bulked up, see how Machacek, Espo look, get a look at the coaches, etc.
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
8:57 am
Putting-great idea, novel for any franchise.
Smoothie
August 13th, 2010
9:00 am
Well stated WBF! See, it helps to avoid posting when “half-drunk and hollowed-eyed”!
Yes Sage, you’ve really enlightened us about our lousy ownership group by telling us the same thing written a slightly different way for about the 300th time. I feel so much smarter being in your company.
I think I’ll give back my deeply discounted tkts to watch the game I love because it’s so outrageous to pay $27 per game and only subsidize incompetence. Man they’re really foolin’ me. And here I thought I was only putting a price on my own entertainment.
You’re so hung up on the past that you can’t even give due credit for better decision-making that has taken place in the last couple of years. Unfortch, those marroons also gave Iso-Joe $120 M but I suppose there are enough little fwag wavers for the Hawks to pay the bills so we can keep watching subsidized hockey.
Sure, ownership helped get us to this point of mediocrity, but ownership has also gotten us Rick Dudley and his moves have put us in a better position to win. But starting 10/8, ownership won’t be hitting the ice to take on the Washington Capitals.
Its up to Bogosian, Little, Kane etc to raise their level of play and make us better. If you’re not excited by the prospect of our youth’s potential, then you are as narrow-minded and obtuse as you seem when you post your scripted words a different way.
Smoothie
August 13th, 2010
9:05 am
kracker – Johnny Burma is taking no prisoners! Love that he is already in ATL getting ready for camp. Kid has a lot of character.
J-man
August 13th, 2010
9:10 am
Rissmiller is AHL filler. He played his way out of the NHL and into the AHL. If he actually makes the Thrashers, I guarantee you all that this will be a very long and very bad season for the Thrashers. If you want to be scared, you can make a terrific case that’s he actually a downgrade over Todd White.
DWTOO
August 13th, 2010
9:14 am
Looks like you’ve recovered nicely Smoothie. Remember we need Sage to keep us on the right track!
J-man
August 13th, 2010
9:15 am
Brendan – I don’t think the return for Esposito would be very high. Considering that he’s coming off two ALC injuries and his brief AHL career has been incredibly underwhelming, I’m not seeing how any team would give up much for him. He’s too high risk. Many observers have stated that he completely lacks what it would take to remake himself into a 3rd line player just to get into the league (think Marty Reasoner who was also a 1st round pick in his day). If they are correct, then Esposito will be all or nothing. He’ll either be a valuable top 6 forward or he will never play a game in the NHL.
Joe Friday
August 13th, 2010
9:17 am
Little, Antro, Bergfors
Kane, Peverly, Buff
Ladd, Espo, Mach
Eager, Slater, Thorburn
Boults, Rissmiller
Hainsey, Oduya
Enstrom, Bogosian
Valabik, Sopel
Kulda
Man, that’s kind of depressing to look at, let’s hope there’s still some moves to be made, we need some proven scoring.
But even if that’s what we go with, what the heck, at least it’ll be better than watching Kovy and Max do their figure 8s in the neutral zone instead of playing at both ends. I’d rather watch lunch pail guys work hard and lose than pansies cherry pick and get blown out.
J.B.
August 13th, 2010
9:35 am
just taking the temperature of the population here… do y’all think dudley is done making moves? seems like if he planned to grab another goal scorer (which I think he should), he’d have done it by now. if he’s waiting for prices to drop to a new low, i think we’re there.
rob
August 13th, 2010
9:35 am
Sage,
only thing embarrassing here is your complete inability to get over it. If this affects you to this extent, life must be a bowl of cherries for you my friend. Enough of that.
Trading Hainsey for Campbell wouldn’t be paying $2.whateverM a season for him, it would be paying $7+M a season for him. He ain’t worth it! Why compound one mistake with another, bigger one? If we fall into a can’t resist situation to trade UP, OK…otherwise, let’s stand pat and see what we have before making more issues. Thorn had a lot of PK time, sure, but I see Kane getting a lions share this year. My knock on Thorn is I see him miss a ton of decent chances where the puck should have been in the net…and that is why he is where he is. And while Ladd didnt have much PK in Chi, I believe that is because they had so many offensive threats who were not a defensive liabilty they could play who would capitalize on short handed chances. I dont want Riss in the lineup, he doesnt have what it takes, and I would rather give a younger guy some time up here. They can only get so much time in minors, before it’s a career there. Some will say they would rather have them playing down there than sitting here, and for the under 20 year olds that may be true. After that though, even as the “fill-in” you are practicing with the team here and that will expose them to the speed and higher skill level that they just won’t see in the AHL.
Kulda, Cormier, Pettersson, maybe Mach
SomaAtl95
August 13th, 2010
9:36 am
Re: Sage’s rant: Imagine it is 1990 and a long suffering team fires its latest coach. The GM decides that it is his turn to try and manage the team. A new GM is brought in. Young talent is drafted – and yet there are people who read the paper and complain about how this team will never win and as long as ownership keeps making boneheaded decisions they will never get anywhere, etc etc etc.
That manager’s name: Bobby Cox. And yes, even though ownership made a lot of blunders in the previous decades he didn’t offload the team until AFTER their long string of success started.
The point is to never assume that a team that is making positive moves will continue to suck. All it takes is the right coaching, young talent to mold and finding a way to win. This is the year the Thrashers make the biggest dent in the NHL that they ever have. Naysayers and Fairweather fans will be following the Thrashers by the end of this season. It may not happen but I’d much rather say “This is our year” than saying “They’re going to suck again!”
Re: Players – I’d like to see Cormier and Burmistrov playing this year. I think if developed correctly Burmistrov could be a very fast and unpredictable scorer, like a mix of Kovy and Mad max. We already know that PC can hit, even if it was the horrible hit he landed that got him into trouble. We don’t need a “Matt Cooke” type player but it would be nice to make any team that faces us scared of all defensive lines. I keep sayin it (and quoting Joe Friday), but I want our black and blue birds to make their opponents black and blue when they leave the ice.
Just my 2 ¢
rob
August 13th, 2010
9:41 am
JF,
Would Boris/Sopel together be a good pairing? I liked Hainsey/Oduya, but I think Toby/Bogo and Boris/Sopel will be better paired another way unless Kulda pushes Boris to 7?
Joe Friday
August 13th, 2010
9:49 am
“Would Boris/Sopel together be a good pairing?”
Tweedledee and Tweedledum! Neither one can move a puck up ice. In my perfect scenario, you want a stay at home guy (Sopel and Boris both are) paired with a offensive dman. Sopel is a stay at home guy all day long, and Boris is an offensive dman, but I mean he’s offensive when he’s out there, pee u!
We need a #1 shut down dman, Brendan, so while I like Campbell’s game and he was integral in the ‘Hawks offense, we can’t pay $7m for a guy who can’t eat 30 minutes a night against opposing team’s #1 line.
“But I fired a 79 today at Heritage and all you naysayers can suck it.”
So what’d you shoot on the back? You’re nuts. I put my skirt on and staying in my air conditioned office and skipped our weekly 4pm Thursday tee times, my wife ran into some of the boys at the local watering hole later last night and said they looked like a bunch of drowned rats, too freakin hot for me, Sally.
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
9:51 am
Allright, I’m gonna work on the negativity angle, then. I didn’t think I was coming across “negative,” but since 3 or more posters do perceive that in my posts, it’s probably there more than I thought. I try to be accurate, as much as possible. And I’m one who, generally-speaking, doesn’t ’sugarcoat’ the past. It is what it is. But I’m purposefully trying to be negative.
When you ask yourself this question, “Do you like this ownership?” What is your answer. And be honest. See, ‘cuz I’d like new ownership better than the prospect of this one getting better.
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
9:53 am
Make that, “not purposefully” trying to be negative.
Zim
August 13th, 2010
9:53 am
WBF – How valuable Chris Thorburn may be to the Thrashers does depend on how the coaching staff envisions his role on the roster. At 6-3, 230 pounds with above average skating ability and a long reach, Thorburn is a prototypical up-ice forechecker. Will Ramsay see him as such? I guess in a month or two we’ll know…
Value in the bottom six is not easy to assess. My personal opinion is that the new NHL has pressed the need for multidimensional players throughout the roster and especially in the bottom six. Thorburn’s ability to jump on the PK makes him more valuable than most fourth line options (the same goes for Jim Slater as a bottom six center, Evander Kane as a rookie last year, or potentially Spencer Machacek as a rookie this season).
Thorburn was the only skater in the entire NHL that eclipsed 165 minutes (173) on the PK while averaging less than ten minutes in total ice time. Chris’ three short-handed goals in 2009-10 (third most in the NHL) even make him a threat offensively while down a man.
While I agree that fourth line players do not make up the core of a team in terms of talent, the role that guys like Boulton, Eager, Slater, and Thorburn are vital to the success of a hockey club over a full slate of 82 games; especially when one or two of those players can step in with a solid body on the PK or in the faceoff circle.
RE: Valabik
A decision regarding Valabik’s future and/or role on the NHL squad may not have to come as early as training camp. Boris had his ACL reconstruction on February 12. Generally, ACL surgery takes between 6-8 months to recover full strength in the knee.
If Valabik’s rehabilitation is ahead of schedule, then Boris could be at full strength right about now. This would give him time to get into ‘hockey shape’ before training camp in September. However, as a player with a significant injury history (ankle twice, ACL, and shoulder), the Thrashers may prolong Valabik’s rehab in order to ensure his health.
If Boris is on the long end of recovery time, then his ACL won’t regain full strength until October. If this turns out to be the case, then Boris will probably need a conditioning stint in the AHL potentially making a return as late as November.
Remember that Valabik cannot be returned to the AHL without clearing waivers so if Boris doesn’t fit into the plans then a trade could be a possibility.
Red Light
August 13th, 2010
9:56 am
SomaATL95
In 1990 the Braves finished in last place in the NL West, so going by your philosophy, the year of the Thrashers will come in 2011-12, not this year! And lets not forget that from 1990 to 1991, the Braves added Pendleton, Belliard, Nixon, Hunter, Bream, Stanton, Deion and Berenguer to the team. So, to your point, more moves are coming!
rob
August 13th, 2010
10:01 am
Zim,
I like Thorburn’s intensity, and while his 3 shortys may have been high, he should have had more. Many times did I catch myself jumping up for what I thought was a sure goal he had only to watch it not go in. Not knocking him, there was an article back around the end of the season where he even said he needed to improve his offensive abilities, so I think even he knows he’s gotta step it up. With the young guys that will be in camp, I think everyone’s going to have to play hard for their spot.
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
10:08 am
Zim-I have no issue with Thiorny, I like ANY player with an edge. His edge and hustle have kept in the NHL. Maybe that is what kept him here over Arty, his ability to kill penalties, take the body and fight on occasion. But he has been here for awhile, I think the Thorny we see today is the best we will see. So at what point do you take the roster spot and bring in one of the youngsters, which is the subject of this particular blog. Take the Braves, at what point to you sit Troy Glaus and give Freddie Freeman a chance? You have to open spots for your youngsters; if you don’t then what motivates these players? I just look at Thorny as a 4th liner who has given his best. Can other players do what he did last year?
All aspects of our game have to get better if we are going to make the playoffs, this includes better penalty killing. Or on the flip side, will Rammer make Thorny a better penalty killer? Maybe I am wrong here.
SomaAtl95
August 13th, 2010
10:10 am
Gotcha RL, just trying to drive the point across that moves made in 1990 were viewed as “more of the same” of a continually bottom dwelling team. A bottom dwelling team that won their division for the next 14 years. Cox was brought in to a bunch of fans wondering just how long he would be the skipper, basically saying the Braves are going to suck no matter who coaches the team and the talent will not be developed correctly and the Braves will always suck… much like the way Sage rips on the Thrashers. That was 20 years ago and even though the Braves are not the team they were there was a time when this city (and the whole southeast) pretty much assumed the Braves were going to win their division. I guess I was just trying to point out that clueless ownership can prevail when they bring on people who make the right mix of brains, power and talent – and I think this is the year of the Thrash.
I fully believe we can be the NHL powerhouse that Washington tries to be. Its just going to take the correct mix.
These days ANYTHING is possible.
Joe Friday
August 13th, 2010
10:17 am
“I didn’t think I was coming across “negative,” ”
You’re not, by any stretch of imagination. It’s just that some folks feel that to be a “real fan” (wtf?) you have to see puppies and sunshine in everything, no matter the facts. As Jack Nicholson once famously said “you can’t handle the truth!”
ChippersLoveChild
August 13th, 2010
10:35 am
Off topic, but a few days ago on Twitter they were discussing the four faces of the Thrasers Mount Rushmore or whatever they were calling it…. Who are your four players?
As for the blog I’d say Kulda needs to make the team. He played too well when he was here for me to think he shouldn’t.. and ideally he would have had any minutes they gave to Chelios last year, still don’t understand that move at all…. for the forwards I went with Cormier and Machacek.
GaVaHokie
August 13th, 2010
10:35 am
Joe… Re Valabik/Sopel… that’s why I’m keen on Postma over Kulda, with Boris as the 7th.
Re: Sage… I still find it odd he follows a team he’s never liked and thinks will never change.
GaVaHokie
August 13th, 2010
10:41 am
Chipper… for those not fully aware, its in reference to Puck Daddy’s ongoing article “Mt. Puckmore” and a lot of them have been scars on the organization too, ie: Daigle in Ottawa.
I said Stefan, Heatley, Hossa and Kovy. First draft pick, first blockbuster trade, first Superstar.
Some had Coaches and GM’s… so I would also say Waddell, Hartley, Heater, Kovy.
Red Light
August 13th, 2010
10:49 am
I like what Thorburn does on the ice because he is a versatile role player: fight, kill penalties, score an occasional goal and play well defensively. Is he an NHL lifer in that role? Probably not, but he can play. Is he expendable at some point? Absolutely. WBF is right on: he’s not part of the core.
Other keen observations today: DWTOO about Kulda; J-man on Esposito and Rissmiller; Zim on Valabik and Joe Friday about it being too hot for golf and Brendan. As for Smoothie, he’s digressing again!
Esposito will not make the team out of camp, possibly ever. He’s a less enthusiastic version of Burmistrov with not nearly as much upside. I’ve been told that he peaked at 16.
Machacek could crack the top six someday, but he’s more likely a responsible two-way forward or third-line type. Cormier’s game translates to the NHL. Initially, he’ll be slotted into the checking line center role, key face-off guy, penalty killer, in-your-face disturber and then could develop the offensive portion of his game with more experience. Postma is likely a year away, as he still isn’t solid defensively yet. Another year in the AHL or a mid-season call-up.
None of the young kids are going to stay up here unless Ramsay intends to play them 10 minutes per night or more. Time and experience is too valuable to sit them in the press box on a nightly basis. The press box is reserved for veterans with one-way contracts like Boulton, Rissmiller, Valabik, etc.
And, we do get it Sage! The past 10 years was deplorable and like you, we’re all hoping for better things to come. None of us liked the “promotion” and we all hope the personnel matters are left to others. Does that mean we can’t try to enjoy what we’ve got heading into the new season? I don’t think the off-season moves categorically mean that this team is 15-20 points better than last year, but when I watched the prospects this summer in comparison to previous years, there is much more depth than ever and no Lane Mansons on the ice. Personally, I’m not sold on the Extreme Makeover yet and have No Reservations that this team couldn’t finish in 9th or 10th again. There are some holes, no question about it (playmaking forwards for one), the Eastern Conference looks to be a wide-open race but this team still has a ways to go to catch the Caps in the SE.
But, we know you know and enjoy hockey, and so you don’t have to “subsidize” the organization, you pick the game and I’ll give you a ticket or two. Spud Webb could use the company in my seats!
Zim
August 13th, 2010
10:54 am
WBF – I’d agree with opening a roster spot in the top nine for a young player or prospect (which is what I think will happen on the third line RW), but the fourth line is a different animal. In my opinion, the only Thrasher prospect that could potentially bring a better fourth line skill set than Thorburn is Patrice Cormier.
Machacek might start off there, but his success at the NHL level is likely as a third liner. Carl Klingberg has Colby Armstrong-like utility potential as a middle six winger (second or third line) and the sample size is too small to gauge how Fredrik Pettersson will best be utilized.
If Jordan LaVallee were still in the system, I’d love for him to get a shot over Thorburn, but I just don’t see anybody in the system that can bring the value that Thorburn does for a fourth line roster spot.
Alan R.
August 13th, 2010
10:55 am
Alan R., we’re talkin’ about how to make the team better. I’m open to all sorts of ideas
The post preceding mine above started off innocently enough, but instantly fell into the “let’s see how many first rounders we’ve sent away.” I had to stop reading.
I know this team has a pretty crappy history. I’m pretty certain all of us here know. Do we really need to be reminded of that? Yeah, this is the offseason. Really slow and a crappy time to be a fan. I implore you, don’t make it any worse of a time than it already is.
Alan R.
August 13th, 2010
10:59 am
It’s just that some folks feel that to be a “real fan” (wtf?) you have to see puppies and sunshine in everything
If you’re referring to me, you might want to reassess your statement, or just take the blinders off. As others would tell you, that is not how I am.
Also, what is this “Real Fan” garbage, anyway? Go ahead. I’ll wait while you make something up.
Sage of Bluesland
August 13th, 2010
11:08 am
“…The point is to never assume that a team that is making positive moves will continue to suck. All it takes is the right coaching, young talent to mold and finding a way to win….”
You’re so incredibly wrong about the history of the Braves’ rising that it’s not even funny. I WAS there and the key to it all was the mid-1980s, when OWNERSHIP determined that they would revamp the minor leagues once and for all–and build the right way, with the proper funding.
Yes, that meant Ted Turner getting out of the decision-making process and getting Bobby Cox here as the GM (with Chuck Tanner as the coach). Yes, that meant Ted Turner witnessing years of pitiful on-field products while the minors re-tooled.
Yes, I was there–and yes, I knew what was going on. The timetable took a little longer than Tanner’s optimistic predictions–but the young core was apparent to all.
What’s the real point that you cannot grasp and thus the comparison is laughably ignorant: OWNERSHIP. Let me spell that out in capital letters so you can see it again: OWNERSHIP.
Get it? Feel like drawing some more comparisons? Please, I need the laugh…
Sage of Bluesland
August 13th, 2010
11:12 am
…Oh, and did I mention the next most important thing: FUNDING.
Commitment by OWNERSHIP with FUNDING.
Get it?
Now compare the learned stewardship of Ted Turner with the cluster that is the ASG!
Compare the GM abilities of Cox/Schuerholz with Waddell!
Get it?
Look no further than the very top of the organization to see what the future (and present) holds…
(silly flag-wavers…all of their delusional dreams built on such obviously flawed ‘hope’…)
Smoothie
August 13th, 2010
11:33 am
Interesting, now that Sage can’t continually whip-up on ol’ bumbling Donnie, he has decided that he’s just going to rail on our pathetic ownership group, which could be aptly referred to as a “mutant slob-child of corporate synergy” (courtest of Mortimer Peacock of the Blueland Chronicle), because he must direct his incessant negativity towards something, someone. What is the point? You’re not only preaching to the choir, you just sound like a whiny, petulant child who doesn’t get his way after being spoiled for 10 years as a pre-teen.
Bugger off!
“So what’d you shoot on the back? You’re nuts. I put my skirt on and staying in my air conditioned office and skipped our weekly 4pm Thursday tee times”
Joe, indeed it was a steamy, hot round of golf, but we were lucky in the fact that we had to play the little-played Tradition side, more target golf than the other two nines, where there was significant shade on just about every tee box save for the first hole. Perhaps the fact that my hands weren’t covered in sweat helped me keep from losing control of the driver.
Keep it in the fairway on that nine and you’ve got many looks from 130 yards and in. Fun little nine. Just wish I hadn’t pushed my drive OB on 8 and made dbl bogey, otherwise I might have shot par on that side. Oh well, there’s always the next round. Hey, fancy that! Forward positive thinking! Cue Sage to crap on my golf game / addiction next! Can’t wait.
Oh yeah, where do you and your wife play? Live on a course?
Smoothie
August 13th, 2010
11:35 am
Darn this spam filter! Guess Trixie doesn’t like golf much!
Dearest Trixie, would you please rescue my lengthy “digression” on the vagaries of golf and Sage’s whiny diatribes.
Trixie (Rawhide's Secretary)
August 13th, 2010
11:42 am
…taking time out from filing nails…
Mr. Smoothie – There…done.
…returning to filing nails…
Red Light
August 13th, 2010
11:44 am
There really is not much disparity in being acutely optimistic and belligerently pessimistic, as neither viewpoint is realistic.
Continue…
rob
August 13th, 2010
11:56 am
I think secretly Sage goes to every game……and cheers for the other team.
On a different note, nhl.com has an article on the importance of goalie coaches, and given that we are bringing in Mason and have youthful Pavs, anyone feel it is detrimental not having one here? If we only contract people to come in when needed as I believe was said before, does anyone know if the person(s) have been chosen or announced? I did hear Mason in his interview say he coaches some during the off season but also that a player doesn’t neccesarily make the best coach. Maybe they think he can coach Pavs???? Maybe we could get Vivs to see if no one knows….or perhaps even Flames?
GS (and other goalies),
thoughts or concerns you see with this?
SomaAtl95
August 13th, 2010
11:57 am
Wow. After a year I finally feel like I belong here. Sage has torn me a new one. Took you long enough. I guess I let out a sheeple “baaahhhhhh” loudly enough to earn your scorn.
You weren’t the only person watching the Braves back in their (really) bad days, and you aren’t the only person who hasn’t been happy with the way the Thrashers have been run. You know what buddy? If you call yourself a hockey fan then STFU and enjoy hockey here. The Oilers and Leafs stunk it up last season – they still have loyal fans through thick and thin. If you want Atlanta to keep their team (and don’t have anything even REMOTELY POSITIVE to say) then just don’t say anything at all! Call everyone here sheep, sheeple, idiots, tards, whatever, it just makes you look like the fat girl at the dance who doesn’t put out so she is going home to complain about how boys are evil and ugly and just want one thing – just not from her. In the past year I’ve tried to take a “Can’t we all just get along” but now that I am one of the “lucky” people to earn your scorn I politely ask that you remain under the bridge with the trolls who say “Atlanta has a hockey team?”
The rest of us “Sheep” will be rooting for our team. You’re subsidizing hate – which must make you Canadian. Why don’t you start adding “Eh?” to your rants about how awful hockey is in “Non traditional markets”
I’ve had my say buddy. Have a great life.
BAAAAAAAAAAAAA! BAAAAAAAAA!!! BAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! – Sheeple Pride!
BlueSpark
August 13th, 2010
12:00 pm
Sage, you do understand that NOTHING you write here about ownership will have ANY AFFECT whatsoever, don’t you? So why not relent? You’re like stendec’s less-retarded cousin.
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
12:15 pm
Zim- good points in your posts-you are a hard presser like Thorny.
Frankly guys, I think Doris’ days are done here. I just don’t see enough in his play that makes him a regular NHL defenseman. I think Smoothie talked about his balance some time ago-he looks like he’s ready to fall over at times-that’s a big “timber”! A guy that big should be a physical presence and/or a shutdown defenseman if he’s going to stay in the league. I know he is relatively young, but I just don’t see the need to waste alotta time on Valabik. If we lose him in waivers going back to the AHL, oh well.
Sage-the team is what it is from top to bottom. I think we have all determined the root causes of the last 10 seasons-they are all pretty clear. If you don’t like it, you can continue to stay home in protest, while most of us prepare to attend games this season.
I am subsidizing my love for hockey.
Zombie Steve
August 13th, 2010
12:41 pm
Same old song and dance with Sage…. every board needs at least one good Negative Nancy, right??
Diego from Lilburn
August 13th, 2010
12:45 pm
I’m with Zim on Thorburn. You keep him because of what he’s good at – PK, short-handed goals, willingness to fight, low salary hit.
If Dudley said, “Hey, anybody who doesn’t want to be here I can find them a new home.” then he might have a line out his door that goes from the offices, through the locker room, and out onto the ice in Duluth. Part of being a professional athlete is giving 100% where you get traded. Hossa couldn’t do it and it showed. Colby couldn’t do it and it showed. I’m sure there are others. I’m not always happy at my job but I don’t sabotage my team for it.
Hokie P. Clisters
August 13th, 2010
12:52 pm
Kovy asks: Can I subsidize my circumvented cap for a finnish goalie, 13,548 sheep, new ownership, and a magical spreadsheet?
Joe Friday
August 13th, 2010
12:53 pm
“I said Stefan, Heatley, Hossa and Kovy. First draft pick, first blockbuster trade, first Superstar.”
Ditto, got to be them.
“you pick the game and I’ll give you a ticket or two. Spud Webb could use the company in my seats!”
What am I, chopped liver? You know the wifey and I love us some club seats, I’ll even pay ya (or let you invite me to Hawk’s Ridge, I’m just that kind of guy).
“Also, what is this “Real Fan” garbage, anyway? Go ahead. I’ll wait while you make something up.”
Settle down, Sparky. That’s an old storyline on this blog and the preceding message board threads, probably predates you and it was not directed at you. There were some that I haven’t seen in a while that kept coming on here (I personally think they were team ticket reps/shills) constantly saying “if you’re a real fan, you’ll buy tix no matter what” “real fans don’t talk bad about their team” and other mindless tripe.
“Oh yeah, where do you and your wife play? Live on a course?”
What is this, crap on Joe Friday day? Play with my wife? No sir, boys golf together, I am not retired yet (I guess we’ll go golfing together then). Last nite I went home and the wifey went out with the girls and found the boys (who surely ripped me a new one for playing Mr. Mom at home while she went out).
Re. the Braves, I do remember the new regime coming in (Schuerholtz) and he brought in Pendleton, and we rolled our eyes, but then voila, like a great chef it all came together. It’s one of the reasons why I railed for years that nothing would change here until the GM changed. At least we got 1/2 way there and it already shows. New owners and we’ll get all the way there. Do not give up hope, but keep the blinders off as well, there’s still plenty of mess in the Spirit Squad’s offices, but the hockey guys closest to the ice got a lot better (Dudley and coaches) and the lineup has some coherence to it.
Zim
August 13th, 2010
1:00 pm
WBF – You and I are just at opposite ends this round, eh?
I’m one of the (few?) people that felt Boris turned a corner in his 27 games with Atlanta last season. Valabik was a +2 last season with an even or better rating in 24 games while never accumulating multiple minuses (only -1) in the other three contests.
Valabik also did a commendable job staying out of the penalty box with ’stupid’ or ‘lazy’ penalties. Of his 36 PIM, 20 minutes came on four fighting majors and six minutes on three roughing penalties (which aren’t good, but aren’t always bad either). Valabik had six technical infractions.
We can debate whether or not Boris Valabik will be a building block for the Thrashers franchise all afternoon, but there is no way to find out until he hits the ice again. However, putting a former first round draft pick with NHL-level physical attributes (size, strength) on waivers is poor asset management. Valabik most definitely would be claimed.
If Atlanta was able to get trade value out of former first round draft busts Patrik Stefan and Alex Bourret, then certainly Dudley could find a suitor for Valabik. The man traded an injured Todd White coming off his worse season in a decade! Running the risk of losing Boris to waivers would be irresponsible asset management.
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
1:01 pm
In a sense, Dudley had his choice of Thorny and Armstrong and he choice Thorburn. Some may argue that Armstrong wanted out and there’s enough evidence to support this statement. But I also don’t remember hearing Dudley trying that hard to keep Army.
So Armstrong does to Tronna, a city that has no love for guys who don’t play every night. Can’t wait till Don Cherry drops the “floater” tag on Armstrong when we disappears for 5-6 games like he did here when he should have been playing for a contract!
TableHockey
August 13th, 2010
1:10 pm
yeah WBF – perhaps Armstrong should have called Exelby before excepting that offer from the Leafs.
GaVaHokie
August 13th, 2010
1:19 pm
I do have to say, changing directions, Waddell had an exciting brand of hockey, although highly unsuccessful. Dudley, on the other hand, while it should be successful, has built a somewhat boring brand of hockey.
Don’t get me wrong, I love the changes. But, there were stretches last year where Bruins hockey was some of the most boring hockey on television. Anyone who suffered through having Wheeler, Ryder and Sturm on there Fantasy Rosters can probably attest.
schroeder
August 13th, 2010
1:21 pm
I am personally ambivilent towards Thorburn,I think his ability to kill penalties and his grit is cancelled by his lack of offensive ability.I would have resigned R2 and put him on the 4th line. My real issue is with Doris, a defenseman needs to know how to skate. I truly believe that Waddell got tired of hearing about his love of smurfs and decided to draft a 6′ 7″ pylon regardless of his ability. He has had ample time to get to the NHL level based on being drafted in the 1st rnd. He still plays a “clutch&grab”type game and that is because he does not possess the skating ability to stay in front of faster skaters and position himself properly.It would not hurt my feelings to see a pkg of Thorburn and Valabik and maybe a pick to NJ for Zajac once the K-puke disaster is over. If he cannot skate by himself without breaking his own ankle or damage it to the extent of requiring surgery,then I sure don’t want him skating on even 3rd d-pairings. One last thing SAGE,one word to you THORAZINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TableHockey
August 13th, 2010
1:21 pm
Zim – I wouldn’t mind the Thrasher’s giving Valabik more time to develop before pulling the trigger on a trade. I thought he was definitely playing his best hockey right before his injury. I would hate to look like the Islanders and give up on a big D man (Chara in their case) because development was too slow.
In fairness though I do see a slight risk in how injury prone he is. If he got hurt again next season for an extended period his trade value plummets.
GaVaHokie
August 13th, 2010
1:22 pm
… This will be the first year since year one that the team won’t have any kind of “razzle dazzle”. What I always called “the dog and pony” show.
Sheeple Pride
August 13th, 2010
1:27 pm
Baaahhhhhhhh! Bahhhhhhhh!!! BAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BAAAAA, BAAAAA ber ann…..
DWTOO
August 13th, 2010
1:38 pm
This is probably Valabik’s put up/shut up year. He probably has one more chance to prove he can play at this level. He has been an enigma – sometimes he’ll make a play and in the next minute looks like he plays on the same Lower A team I did.
Tom Lysiak
August 13th, 2010
2:39 pm
There should be at least three givens that never really require repeating on this blog (yet they constantly are by the same folks): 1) The owners are a huge part of the problem (care more about the Hawks, cheap, broke, inept, etc.); 2) Don Waddell had more than ample time to build a great organization and he did not (bad draft picks, some good draft picks, bad trades, some good trades, bad coaching choices, etc); 3) some players don’t want to play here, even after landing here not by choice.
Reality sucks, but here it is: 1) ASG still owns the team and even though they supposedly had partners coming in, they will own the team for the forseeable future. All this whining and bad-mouthing has not and will not make that change. Even they know how they are viewed and they don’t care what you think. 2) DW makes killer money running this franchise and is apparently untouchable. Again, all this whining and bad-mouthing has not and apparently will not make that change. He sure doesn’t care what you think. 3) This is PROFESSIONAL hockey. It is big-boy land. If you want to play professional sports, you will follow your contract wherever it goes. Or, go home and suck your thumb. Whether you want to be here (or anywhere else) should be irrelevant if you are a paid professional. If you choose to mail it in here or in another city, then you deal with the fallout (see S. Kozlov). Some like Colby end up making out after leaving, but will he mail it in there when he sees the bad things about playing there? These guys make enough money to either be set for life or at least live very, very well. Professional sports requires you to go where your talent can be utilized and compensated accordingly. Chipper Jones seems to prefer living on his ranch in Texas, but guess what? Playing baseball in Atlanta bought him that ranch. I don’t give a $#%^ whether a player wants to play here. He can honor the contract like a professional or get a job at a Burger King in the city he prefers living in.
I personally can’t wait for October 8th to “subsidize the futility” with a cold beer. See, I’m going there to watch the game and support the team that has the Thrashers logo on the jersey. I’ll have a great time doing it and could care less what “the boycotters” think. See ya there Sage.
Dale Rolfe
August 13th, 2010
2:40 pm
Valabik is just a stronger version of Todd Reirden.
Uwe Krupp
August 13th, 2010
2:41 pm
Valabik is just a left-handed, younger version of me.
Sage of Bluesland
August 13th, 2010
2:42 pm
“…Sage-the team is what it is from top to bottom. I think we have all determined the root causes of the last 10 seasons-they are all pretty clear. If you don’t like it, you can continue to stay home in protest, while most of us prepare to attend games this season.
I am subsidizing my love for hockey.”
But what I simply don’t understand is this is precisely what enables the ownership to continue with their ways; I wouldn’t change a thing, either, if I had paying customers who were just happy to be there while I counted my money!
I can understand what you’re saying–and at least you’re civil and comprehensible in it–but I just don’t agree with it.
However, I will continue to encourage others to stop putting money in places it doesn’t belong (at least my judgment on that point). I have done it many times and I HAVE had an impact, I can assure you.
I want a team to be proud of; I want truth, honesty, and accountability; I want to know precisely what the ownership’s plan is, be it happy-to-be-in-the-league to win-a-title-or-be-fired. As a (formerly) paying consumer, I don’t just want them, I demand them. I AM (well, was) the customer.
If you (all) like embarrassment and incompetence, then feel free to pay for it…I’ll choose to laugh at you when you complain, especially when you wonder aloud ‘why is it like this?’ or ‘why do I subject myself to this treatment’…I especially enjoy that, too! Heaven knows, with the folks and their hopes/dreams/fantasies around here, I have no shortage of material to work with and laugh at…
I actually believe in putting action into words–and not just following along like a lemming…It’s the ONLY thing which will get ownership’s attention. Cut the funds and watch how fast the change occurs.
And, if this ownership group just pays lip-service to winning the title, then we have a right to know this. If they sell to cut their losses, then I say good riddance. If the team moves, life WILL go on…So be it.
Not another dollar for incompetence. The folks who have ALL the power in the entire equation walk around saying ‘woe is me’…Yet, they can force the very change they want–but refuse to suffer short-term sacrifice for the longer-term good. That is a sheep, by its very definition.
I’ll never understand or support that mindset.
Red Light
August 13th, 2010
2:44 pm
Thank you Tom Lysiak. A perfect dose of realism!
Joe Friday…your lovely wife can have a ticket anytime, you however, must pay for yours!
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
2:46 pm
Again, I didn’t think I was being negative. I was trying to show that trading away Valabik, potentially, isn’t something ‘way off the table’ simply because he was a 1st round pick. And I cited some historicals to support it. It really, truly wasn’t meant to be negative, Alan R. I’m surprised that so many people took it that way. I’ll say it again, if trading Valabik away makes us better a better team with the return, then how can that be a bad thing?? Or a negative thing.
I think there should be optimism heading into this season, not negativity. Craig Ramsay very well may be our best coach ever. And if he shaves off 30 goals for the Goals Against, it’ll be a nice achievement. Also, Dudley is better than Waddell at decision-making. I far trust him more to find the right fit at the trade deadline. And lastly, nobody should be depressed about a season that hasn’t started yet, when the season is 7 months long. It’s not like Dudley went out at saddled us with Ken Klees and Uwe Krupp/Jani Hurme rehabilitation projects. There’s nothing like that, even remotely, going on. It’s a new day in goal. The defense is probably better. But the losses of Finny and Kovalchuk will have to be dealt with. Maybe Bryan Little can get back to 31 goals? He did it once before. These comments are not meant to be negative.
Red Light
August 13th, 2010
2:49 pm
Nothing wrong with your convictions Sage, nicely said, but like WBF said, hockey is too important to me not to attend.
Tom Lysiak
August 13th, 2010
2:49 pm
“That is a sheep, by its very definition.”
Uhhh, actually this is the definition of a sheep:
Main Entry: sheep
Pronunciation: \ˈshēp\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural sheep
Usage: often attributive
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English scēap; akin to Old High German scāf sheep
Date: before 12th century
1 : any of various hollow-horned typically gregarious ruminant mammals (genus Ovis) related to the goats but stockier and lacking a beard in the male; specifically : one (O. aries) long domesticated especially for its flesh and wool
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
2:55 pm
Thanks Tom-you are right on.
Sage-we do have some change, maybe not all the change we would like but we have a hockey man making player decisions and REAl cooch behind the bench. Dudley and Ramsay are 2 guys I respect in any organization. Me staying home is only going to deprive me of watching hockey which is too great of a price to pay. I go to Braves’ games frequently even though I despise the Baves’ owners and their GM.
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
2:56 pm
Joe Friday. Thank you. The character Joe Friday always says, “Just the facts.” Sometimes facts are interpreted in a positive way, and other times in a negative way. But the facts, themselves, don’t do anything. They just are what they are.
“It is what it is” is not a catch phrase. “It is what it is” is an explanation of events or facts as they actually occured.”
What I cannot understand, is why people think it’s negative to point out that former 1st round draft picks have been traded. To me, it’d be far more negative for those same players to walk “for nothing but reclaimed cap space” as opposed to what we could salvage for them. To me, that seems pretty straight-forward. And it is neither positive nor negative. It it what it is.
Smoothie
August 13th, 2010
3:11 pm
Sage, your argument might have more weight if the ownership actually had debt. Apparently, they have sufficiently deep pockets to tinker and experiment. I think they have finally awoken and taken a more conservative and savvy approach.
But even if they were still lost in the wilderness, what is the worst thing that is going to happen to them if they actually start listening to people like YOU who have supposedly spoken so loudly with their wallet? Worse case scenario is they sell the franchise and and they lose part of their investment. But its worse for the fans if the franchise gets moved under new ownership in 5 or 10 years, whenever the covenant with the city runs out.
Chances are, they’ll just move on from whiny schmoes like yourself and find more customers and fans out of a pool of 5 million potential customers. There are a lot of cities with bad ownership groups who repeat the same mistakes that our group has / will. But there are other very good ownership groups whose teams have not performed up to expectations. It happens, its sports.
There are no guarantees from spending a lot of money. And in business, there are no guarantees even if you run your business wisely. Obviously, if you make wise decisions, you can weather short-term storms and stay afloat a long time. But this hockey market is still growing and has not matured. There are a lot of young fans who will end up paying customers whether you like it or not.
It’s really funny to see you making all of these self-righteous statements of superiority because you think you have it figured out. But this franchise has already turned the corner that you think is still on the horizon. Sucks for you because you are so invested in your thinking that you will probably refuse to enjoy some good hockey just to make a point. Enjoy your lonely, lofty perch.
Tom Lysiak
August 13th, 2010
3:17 pm
Thanks R.L and WBF. Just keepin it real….
DWTOO
August 13th, 2010
3:17 pm
Hey Brendan – No worries friend. You’re not known as “The Professor” for nothing. You have good insights and I always enjoy reading your posts. And I agree about trading Boris – especially to a cap strapped team that could bring us a good forward in return. Think we’re pretty deep on D this year (whoever thought anyone would say that) and he’s expendable.
And thanks to Tom Lysiak for putting it down in writing. A friend of mine once said “Bad hockey is still better than good basketball”. Wise words. Staying home would hurt me more that the ASG.
DWTOO
August 13th, 2010
3:18 pm
Remember – Don’t feed the trolls!
R. Stroz (As Big Chief)
August 13th, 2010
3:35 pm
Um, Juicy Fruit.
World Be Free
August 13th, 2010
3:57 pm
Nurse Rachett
glovesave29
August 13th, 2010
4:05 pm
DWTOO – a root canal is better than basketball.
rob
August 13th, 2010
4:05 pm
I’m gonna be part of the herd Oct 8th. The Boys In Blue need to know the fans support THEM. That they care about hockey. Why? Because they are playing hockey and representing us. If we don’t support them, it’s no wonder no one wants to stay! You can go play on another bad team where the fans at least show up and support you. Why do the fans support bad teams? Because they love the game! You can’t enjoy the good times if you don’t have the bad times too.
SomaAtl95
August 13th, 2010
4:29 pm
Baaahhhhh, err. well said rob
We sheep need to stick around so the Thrashers don’t get the flock out of town 
I think some people would stroke out if Serta Mattresses had a night @ Philips where they gave out little sheep that have Serta and the Thrashers on them.
Sage of Bluesland
August 13th, 2010
4:36 pm
…I DO like the marketing idea of Serta giving out foam GaVa’s, rob’s, and smoothie’s! That is a great idea!
Don Waddell and the ASG sincerely thank you for your support! They’ll tell you so during the next town-hall meeting, where they empathize with the fans…and make you feel all good again…
Just like last time…
and the time before that…
and the time before that….
(You’re right–this time the words seem different; the words from Waddell and the ASG seem so sincere this time around! They really care! Uh-huh!)
Joe Friday
August 13th, 2010
5:32 pm
“DW makes killer money running this franchise and is apparently untouchable. Again, all this whining and bad-mouthing has not and apparently will not make that change.”
Wait, he is still the GM? Well smack my rear and call me Shirley . ..
“your lovely wife can have a ticket anytime, you however, must pay for yours!”
Sweet, 1/2 price!
Joe Friday
August 13th, 2010
5:40 pm
“The character Joe Friday always says, “Just the facts.” Sometimes facts are interpreted in a positive way, and other times in a negative way.”
Yep. You can face reality as it is, the good and the bad, and embrace the good and deal with the bad and try to effect change, or you can bury your head in the sand and make yourself believe fairy tales like “the boycott has had no effect” while going down to the arena night after night seeing empty seats and then watch the Spirit Squad move Waddell out of the way and finally make fan friendly concessions.
I’ve always preferred just dealing with the reality of how things are, but that’s just me . . . Happy Friday, fellas, beer thirty!
Tom Lysiak
August 13th, 2010
6:07 pm
“…..and then watch the Spirit Squad move Waddell out of the way….”
Wait Shirley, did they move him out of the way or is he still the GM? I called you Shirley as requested, but you’ll have to get some fellow “boycotters” to smack your rear. Enjoy the beer!
schroeder
August 13th, 2010
6:21 pm
You may call me a sheep,no matter,the one thing I will answer to is,”Hockey Fan”. If my support of a professional hockey team in ATL is “subsidizing the mediocrity” so be it!! I have lived in Ga all 56 years of my life,I am not a transplant. I became a hockey fan in the 70’s and I died a little when the Flames left for Calgary. I DO NOT WISH TO GO THROUGH THAT AGAIN!!!! So if knowing that more established franchises than ours has done considerably worse, SO WHAT, Sage, you go forth spewing this semen from your mouth about how you are the “ENLIGHTENED ONE”,all I can say is if you care so little and the thought of not having an NHL franchise in ATL means so little to you. By all means,stay home,don’t watch, holler at all the neighbors kids to stay off your lawn. Have you ever heard of the concept of an unexpressed thought! I am personally tired of hearing it. GO KICK A PUPPY AND LEAVES US THE HELL ALONE! LISTEN CLOSELY, THIS IS BY FAR AND AWAY THE BEST OFF SEASON I CAN REMEMBER AND IF YOU CANNOT SEE THAT AND CAN ONLY SEE GLASS HALF EMPTY ,WHO NEEDS YOU. IF YOU ARE NOT A PART OF THE SOLUTION,YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!
Befuddled
August 13th, 2010
6:35 pm
Dear Rawhide:
I just got my 1,788th e-mail (yes I saved them all) from a Russian girl who wants to meet me discreetly. I clicked on the link to her photos and she looks pretty hot. I’m torn…do I tell my girlfriend or suggest to the Russian gal to meet me at a Thrashers game?
Signed,
Befuddled
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
6:47 pm
DWTOO, yours is the quote of the day, “A friend of mine once said “Bad hockey is still better than good basketball.” Truer words never spoken.
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
6:49 pm
SomaATL, you’ve always been welcome here.
Brendan
August 13th, 2010
7:30 pm
Guys, you’re really letting Sage get under your skin too much. It’s your lives. You lead them as you see fit, or as best you are able. If you want to go to games, then go. And enjoy yourself. If you don’t want to go to games, then don’t. If you’re in the position of financial pinch, try to look for game coupons and/or discounts. Or one of these online ticket hubs that sell tickets at fraction (sometimes just one-third) of what they’re worth. Somebody out there has a web link to it. Or cozy up to an STH and tag along for the ride! It’s no sin or crime to be economically disadvantaged, people. Remember, the only poor people … are those who lack knowledge. So, here’s some tips for you. If you go to a Thrasher game at the holidays, bring an unwrapped toy for the “Toys for Tots” campaign. Bring one each time you go to a December game. In previous years, the Thrashers will swap out your toy for two “fairly nice” seats for an upcoming game, usually in January or February. The Thrashers have a list the games that are available for your FREE seats, and preferred seating location. That’s right! You actually get to pick the game or games you want from that list! How sweet is that? You can rack up quite a few tickets this way. So, why not take the whole family? The toys don’t have to be expensive. But they do have to be in their original packaging. Your local Target or Wal-Mart will have affordably priced toys that still make nice gifts for a child.
Moving right along … if you’re a hockey fan out there … and you just happen to be reading this post … it would be my sincere suggestion that you give the Atlanta Thrashers some of your time and attention this year. This team is in a brand new situation. They’re going to try a whole different approach this season. It’s not a team laden with Superstars, trying to hit their numbers. This ought to be a much more TEAM-oriented strategy this year. There’s a new coach in Craig Ramsay. There’s new assistant coaches, including an Associate Coach, Torchetti, who came from the defending Stanley Cup Champions. The GM’s office has a name plate that reads, “Rick Dudley.” And he’s way better than Don Waddell, even if he is under Waddell’s purview. Dudley is doing more with this team than, frankly, Waddell could. So, it’s not exactly “the same ol’ same old.” The car ride home might not be so acrid, even after a loss. Then again, I’m not the sort of fan who expects Stanley Cups year-in and year-out. I’m not the sort who throws the team under the bus after every loss, especially in build-years. And I’m not the sort who flys off the handle when the team has a bad game. Or two. Or Three. I’m the sort who does get angry over accountability. I don’t ask for Stanley Cups, but I do ask for an “honest effort” at it. And any budget that is $8-10 million under the ceiling does bother me a little bit. But I understand the situation. I wish I could tell you that everything will be coming up roses. But the truth is … this team actually is … moving in a BETTER direction that it’s ever been. (I won’t say “moving in the right direction,” (Copyright, Bruce Levenson & Don Waddell, 2004-present,) as I’d wind up having to pay the Atlanta Spirit, LLC a royalty. So, with that in mind, I actually urge you to come out to a game, or more games, this year.
Sage of Bluesland
August 13th, 2010
8:06 pm
“…IF YOU ARE NOT A PART OF THE SOLUTION,YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!”
That’s one of my favorite lines, too…Too bad you can’t recognize that I HAVE offered nothing but solutions–yet you have refused to implement them.
Now, go back to your little “Legends of Blueland” booklet and continue dreaming the dream.
But, do remember this: Don’t ever–EVER–why this organization fails. You’re just as big a part of the problem as the ownership which is held unaccountable.
Yes, that’s right–YOU have become the bigger part of the problem now…
Rawhide
August 13th, 2010
8:49 pm
Dear Befuddled,
Find out if the Russian gal can skate well and backcheck like hell on the defensive side of the ice. If she isn’t prone to taking silly penalties at inopportune times of the game, all the better.
If indeed this is the case with Little Ms. Ruskie then not only meet her at Philis Arena, put her in a Thrashers uniform and get her out on the ice. Then you and your girlfriend can watch from the lower bowl seats together.
Rawhide
Nate
August 13th, 2010
9:34 pm
The entertainment value of this blog never ceases to amaze me. Good stuff yet again.
Befuddled
August 14th, 2010
12:03 am
Dear Rawhide:
Thanks for the advice, but the girlfriend just told me she could extract a tennis ball through a garden hose. Trashed the e-mails and and my GMail account. Have a good night!
World Be Free
August 14th, 2010
9:15 am
Brednan, I take Sage for what he is, a guy with an opinion just like the rest of us. While repetitive, some of his posts are pretty amusing.
But I think your second paragraph hits the nail right on the head. Some new hockey people that know their stuff. Is everything perfect? Nope, but there are issues with the majority of the clubs in the league. It could be worse-we could be the Rangers’ fans about to deal with the hope and promise of Todd White! I think we know how that will turn out.
Brendan
August 14th, 2010
9:16 am
Sage, I have a question for you. If Dudley’s decisions, even while under the thumb of Waddell, who is ultimately employed by the Atlanta Spirit, LLC, make the team beter … and the team finishes HIGHER than 83-points this year, where does this leave the boycott? Still in full effect? Or should there be some easing of the economic sanctions?
Let’s tweak the example a bit … and the Thrashers, by hook or by crook, squeak in at #8, back into the playoffs, and while there … manage to win a game. Or two. What does this do to accountability? It’s difficult to imagine that anyone would be getting fired over those results, given the situation we find ourselves in 2010. Even at 84-points and no playoffs, the Thrashers would technically be making ‘incremental progress.’ In the AS, LLC world, that seems to be the ‘phrase that pays.’
I’m interested in your response. We cannot fire ownership. Ownership has not fired Waddell. Rick Dudley has done nothing worthy of his dismissal. Craig Ramsay hasn’t coached his first game for the Thrashers. If Dudley and Ramsay get the desired results … I know, the operative word being IF, would this change your mind about fans supporting this team, by attending in droves? Or, is the policy a hardcore one … where there can be no attendance while either (1) Don Waddell is still with the organization in any capacity or (2) The Atlanta Spirit, LLC owns the team?
Red Light
August 14th, 2010
9:34 am
Here are my thoughts on the depth chart. So many line combinations will be used, it’s almost useless to project those.
C • Antropov • Peverley • Eager • Cormier • Slater • Rissmiller
W (Grinders) • Ladd • Byfuglien • Kane • Thorburn • Slater • Boulton • Machacek • Stewart • Aliu
W (Scorers) • Bergfors • Little • Ladd • Kane • Byfuglien • Pettersson • Burmistrov • Machacek
With time and experience, Burmistrov should move up the chart, but he’s young and there is no rush to play him here yet.. Ladd and Byfuglien can play either role but are more valuable as grinders, while I believe Kane has the most upside as a scorer of all the grinders listed because of his speed and positional play. Machacek also is an unknown at this point, and of course Cormier.
D • Oduya • Enstrom • Kulda • Postma
D • Hainsey • Bogosian • Sopel • Valabik
G • Pavelec • Mason
Brendan
August 14th, 2010
9:34 am
WBF, last year … the NY Rangers missed the playoffs because Brian Boucher was one save better than Henrik Lundqvist, during Game # 82’s shootout. The Rangers went home. The Flyers went to the Finals, bowing out in overtime of Game Six.
Todd White shouldn’t make anyone excited. Well, I can think of one poster who would be. But I’m not going there. Instead, I’ll point us all to some ‘perspective’ on the NY Rangers, when there weren’t any salary cap restraints. From the 1997-98 season through the last year without the salary cap, 2004, the Rangers missed the playoffs for ALLL SEVEN of those seasons. That’s astonishing, really. The NYR was spending between $72 million to $80 million something-a-year in payroll. That’s tens of millions MORE than what is presently permitted.
Through the five completed years of the current CBA, the Rangers have made the playoffs every year except 2010, where again, they failed to qualify for the playoffs on the basis of a shootout loss … in Game # 82. In 2007 & 2008, the NY Rangers advanced into the 2nd round. They hadn’t done that since 1997, when they ultimately lost to the Flyers in the Eastern Conference Finals, when they had Gretzky, I believe.
For as much as this blog rags on Ranger GM & Team President Glen Sather … they’ve had better results than the Thrashers, despite making, perhaps, stupider moves with respect to their roster. It is a puzzlement. Let’s see if Gaborik stays ‘happy’ this year. After all, he’ll be reunited with Todd White.
Brendan
August 14th, 2010
9:39 am
Red Light, I think we’ll need Rich Peverley to have a great year. If Peverley is the next guy on the milk carton, it might get tough. We really need Peverley to continue the magic.
World Be Free
August 14th, 2010
9:51 am
Brendan, you are a posting machine! I think hockey alot, not like you. But your points in the New York Rangers bring up the difference between making playoffs and making an impact in playoffs. Again, we need to just ask Sabres fans-it is almost WORSE to make playoffs and not go very far than to not make the playoffs at all. Teams like Buffalo and the Rangers fail to make the necessary changes in their inferior teams to make an impact in the playoffs. Standing part, or changing “C” players for other C players is no improvement. No team throws good money at bad players more than the Rangers (Edmonton close 2nd). At least non-playoff teams get high picks, the chances to select quality players to improve their chances. The Rangers won the Stanley Cup in 1994-before the current CBA when they had a chance to “BUY” the Cup, which is exactly what they did.
Your point on Peverly-I was thinking about the need for quality centerman play this morning. The Thrashers have failed to improve their 2-way centerman play in the offseason. We still do not have a shutdown pivot that can win faceoffs and counter the other team’s top line in the last 10 minutes of of a game with a one goal lead. Belanger is about to resign with Washington.
Zim
August 14th, 2010
10:08 am
Red Light – Maybe this is too nit-picky, but Rissmiller and Eager are wingers. Burmistrov is a center for now (and will probably stay there based on Dudley’s gushing over his faceoff abilities, hockey I.Q. and ice vision).
Also, though Dudley hinted that Carl Klingberg will likely head back to Frolunda, I’d guess that Klinger is probably above Stewart and Aliu on the depth chart for grinding wingers.
Old Time Hockey
August 14th, 2010
10:32 am
The BEST way to determine who makes the team and gives them the best opportunity to make the playoffs? Let’s go old school here and see how they perform in training camp. Does Valabik continue to improve (as he was before the injury)? Is Cormier capable of making the team? Is Slater the guy from 2 years ago, or the guy from the last half of last year? Does Esposito have anything left? Let’s see at camp and go from there.
Brief historical: Grew up watching the Islanders…from the beginning. They didn’t have a big scorer the first year. The big pick year one was Billie Harris who was their Patrick Stefan…never lived to the hype. Trottier came along and was great from the start, but they still searched for the big scorer. ‘77-78 they drafted Mike Bossy who was passed over by 14 teams (Actually 12 teams because the Rangers and Maple Leafs passed on him twice!). He was thought of as a scorer who couldn’t check. Al Arbour said it was easier to teach a scorer how to check than to teach a checker to score (of course, he never had to coach Kovy). First pre-season game…no one really knows anything about him (pre-Google)…everyone is chatting like a concert at Chastain. First shift he gets the puck on the right wing and one stride inside the blue line rips a slapper off the far post…goalie didn’t even move. The whole arena went silent and no one ever didn’t watch him after that. Bottom line is let’s see what they show at camp. If they’ve got the talent and did their off-season work, it will show. Reading other peoples “opinions” and what they think will happen is just filler at this point. Don’t get hung up on it.
Brendan
August 14th, 2010
12:29 pm
Old Time Hockey is right. Let’s see who performs best in training camp. I trust Ramsay and Torchetti to make the right choices.
World Be Free
August 14th, 2010
1:05 pm
Old Time, Trotts and Potvin are two of my favorite palyers of all time. Isles had some great teams in the late 70’s, though I was never and Isles fans I certainly did respect them alot.
Red Light
August 14th, 2010
1:44 pm
I left off Klingberg because of Dud’s comments and I think Eager and Rissmiller have played center during their careers, at least they have been listed as such. I saw Burmistrov playing wing at camp so I based the above on how I believe they fit. And, of course, camp will have a bearing, I’m just saying this is how I believe the depth chart is right now. Don’t expect it to remain that way.
Sage of Bluesland
August 14th, 2010
1:49 pm
Brendan–I’ve had my fill of the “incremental” progress that kept the sheep in love with Don Waddell for about six years…That phrase means absolutely nothing to me anymore.
You’re either serious about fielding a winning, respectable team with the real goal of winning a title–or you are not. There is no middle ground.
The continued employment of the man who has single-handedly burned all goodwill and run this team into the ground is but Exhibit A to the case this organization is the latter. Exhibit B is the spending-pattern. Exhibit C is the minor league(s) feeder system and its state.
But their propaganda is nothing but an insult to my intelligence; and when the sheep continue to jump in (in droves, too) and continue to defend the indefensible–it becomes maddening…but also comic.
It’s funny how some of the louder sheep of years past have gone away–or have kept significantly quieter these days. I guess being so wrong so often for so many years takes its toll.
But, fear not, there’s a whole new wave of ignorant little sheep ready to take up the Crusade…We’ll see them disappear and silence over the next few years, as well…
Nope–not a single dollar for incompetence. But, Brendan, you made one statement that does bother me: “You can’t fire ownership”. This is true–but you can force them to make a decision. Unfortunately, too many are subsidizing their behavior for them to even want to change their ways.
That has got to stop for there to be any progress–or any real chance of winning consistently…Titles aren’t won by luck; their genesis lies at the very top of the organization.
With this current group, we have NO CHANCE. None whatsoever.
Aristotle
August 14th, 2010
2:55 pm
Thanks, Sage. I now get it. If I accuse thrasher fans of being subsidized sheep under the guise of circumvented rants then I have in fact become a grumpy old goat.
World Be Free
August 14th, 2010
3:41 pm
Sage, you just can’t get it through your head that nobody here disagrees with what you have stated about the past. Like I said yesterday, you can stay home in protest all you want – good for you. But most of us are hockey fans that will PAY to see the game we love. There are plenty of fans in the league that can apply your beliefs to their local teams. Some choose to go to games, others stay home just like you. One of my best friends in from New Zealand-he’d get a kick out of the sheep references.
World Be Free
August 14th, 2010
3:41 pm
Must have been the picture of Don on Viv’s article that got Sage going.
SomaAtl95
August 14th, 2010
5:12 pm
What I fail to understand is if you hate the team so much and are tired of “subsidizing” losers, why do you feel the need to come here and constantly bitch about it? The conversation, no matter what the topic, has someone who holds a poster up in the air that says “The End is near – REPENT”. Everyone has viewpoints, but for crying out loud Sage unless you’re just reposting your propaganda repeatedly for the lurkers and new commentators that come along its pretty clear where you stand. My wife is half Jewish and some members of my family are hard-core Christians and it gets uncomfortable when anything turns into a chance to thank Jesus for everything (and I MEAN EVERYTHING) and they talk to her like she will rot in hellfire because she is Jewish. The irony is that my wife was raised Catholic, the only way people think she is Jewish is based on her maiden name. If my family members would drop trying to hit her over the head with Jesus and engage in whatever the topic of conversation is they may actually learn that my wife has the same basic beliefs. We get it man, we really do. You hate D-Wad. You despise the ASG. You think that no matter what happens on the ice the men behind the curtain will be the downfall of the Thrashers. We all understand it and most everyone will even comment on the fact the we are more than aware of your viewpoint. I’ll even admit that 99% of the time we all share your viewpoint and if we all sat down at a game could discuss the game itself and engage in the debate about the business side. If Rawhide talks about what players will make the Atlanta roster I’m sure everyone would like to have your views on the PLAYERS. Take your hate filled blinders and contempt for management and ownership out of the equation – honestly – who do you think will make it? When the blog topic is about the business, management or ownership side then I’m sure you will notice all of us “sheep” actually agree with you.
Come on man, relax, drink a beer, rub one out, do whatever relaxes you and join in the conversation. I honestly think if you stop treating the rest of us posters as idiots there wouldn’t be so many people so fast to wonder what the hell your problem is.
We know where you stand on one topic. How about joining in on the rest of the conversation?
kracker
August 14th, 2010
5:48 pm
Baa baa bluesheep!
SomaAtl95
August 14th, 2010
5:54 pm
Don’t get me wrong, I’m full of “Sheeple Pride”
Just trying to pass out an olive branch to sage and actually see if he has opinions other than his usual ones.
GaVaHokie
August 14th, 2010
7:07 pm
The continued employment of the man who has single-handedly burned all goodwill and run this team into the ground is but Exhibit A
Sage, interesting this is your first example. Would this be the non-acknowledgement of the Atlanta Flames? Is that the root of your hatred?
Zim
August 14th, 2010
7:27 pm
Red Light – Out of curiosity, I looked up faceoff statistics for Eager and Rissmiller to get an idea of how much ice time either have as a pivot in the NHL. Rissmiller took over 200 faceoffs for the Sharks two seasons ago and was fifth on the team. Eager has only taken one faceoff in the last three seasons with Chicago.
I didn’t get to prospect camp, but aren’t the scrimmages 4-on-4? Burmistrov didn’t take any faceoffs?
Smoothie
August 14th, 2010
7:50 pm
Its obvious why Sage is obsessed with sheep isn’t it? Stop subsidizing his ego by trying to make nice with him as we all should know he’s only in it for the baaaaackside. If you catch my drift. Stop being nice to the class bully. He’s only a sheep in wolf’s lingerie, um I mean clothing.
kracker
August 14th, 2010
7:57 pm
From a Zim comment: “….though Dudley hinted that Carl Klingberg will likely head back to Frolunda, I’d guess that Klinger is probably above Stewart and Aliu on the depth chart for grinding wingers.”
Zim is probably correct.
However, I am wondering if Klingberg is familiar with the old M*A*S*H television program? Or worse, do today’s NHL fans of opposing teams remember it? Jamie Farr’s attire (as Corporal Maxwell Q. Klinger) on the TV show could make for some interesting posters….signs, that is.
kracker
August 14th, 2010
8:49 pm
As always, my advice is don’t feed the trolls.
Sage of Bluesland
August 14th, 2010
8:51 pm
“Sage, interesting this is your first example. Would this be the non-acknowledgement of the Atlanta Flames? Is that the root of your hatred?”
No–I thought my illustration was clear: it’s one Don Waddell. No double-meanings or hidden points. I was a kid when the Flames were here; went to a couple of games every year–and liked them well enough…but wasn’t ‘crushed’ by any stretch of the imagination when they left for Canada.
WBF is more correct on the source of my current ire than not. To see the mug of this incompetent buffoon and to have him blustering about ticket sales makes me absolutely sick to my stomach. It just proves to me that he is more control than previously believed. I know some will say the team president has jurisdiction over such matters; I don’t care, to put this idiot front-and-center of the organization proves what the ownership thinks of the Atlanta fans.
No respect given–and none has been earned despite the mere window-dressing of GM and coaching changes. It’s the same old shell-game.
Yet some idiots defended this clown for many years–including creating spreadsheets of delusion which ‘proved’ that he was doing a better than average job! I still laugh at that perfect storm of arrogance, ignorance, and pretentious lunacy! (and you know who you are, despite not showing up as often as you used to–well, I don’t blame you, either–I’d be embarrassed too)
Unfortunately, Soma, I can’t discuss the players because they’re just the peripheral picture to me. I’m not a technical grognard like Brendan and many others (I don’t mean that in a bad way, either), where analyzing the faceoffs won means we should play this guy or that, etc. ad nauseam.
Nope, at center-stage is the all-mighty dollar. The item that the ownership craves–the item that the mercenaries (i.e. players) crave…the item which resides in the element which gets the least respect in the entire equation: the FANS. This ownership has proven time and again what they think of the fans–and to see some of them buy into it hook, line, and sinker is simply unacceptable to me.
I will still encourage as many as I can through my means…We all have to play with the tools we are given, right? The players on the team? Nah, I stopped caring a long time ago–and, based on our retention rate of the ‘good’ ones, it appears they have, too…
I don’t blame them in the least…Winning a title is everything…That will never happen under the ASG, period. Unless they change their ways, which they’ve shown no inclination whatsoever…
GaVaHokie
August 14th, 2010
9:29 pm
Unfortunately, Soma, I can’t discuss the players because they’re just the peripheral picture to me. I’m not a technical grognard like Brendan and many others (I don’t mean that in a bad way, either), where analyzing the faceoffs won means we should play this guy or that, etc. ad nauseam.
Obviously you’re not much of a marketer or PR person either. What do you expect the organization to say about the team? It’s their job to create hype. Are they supposed to say “We are not really trying folks, save your money”?
How can you say they’re apologetic either? How many coaches and players have been thrown under the bus over the years?
GaVaHokie
August 14th, 2010
9:35 pm
Furthermore… Levenson did a pretty good job of killing “goodwill” with STHers, so I hardly think Waddell gets “single-handed” blame if any at all. I’m not exactly sure what your example is for “Exhibit A” anyway. Do share?
… and I hardly think Sara cares about your opinion.
Sage of Bluesland
August 14th, 2010
10:06 pm
“…It’s their job to create hype. Are they supposed to say “We are not really trying folks, save your money”?…”
Thus, they lie about their true intentions? That’s what makes me laugh at those who actually think this player or that will make a hills-beans worth of difference! This is precisely why I laugh at the utter delusion of some–especially those who would actually make excuse after excuse for the underperformance (wink).
OK, “great” (abeit intentionally) obtuse point …Shall we make it Exhibit A-1 for Waddell…and A-2 for Levenson/ASG? Does that suffice for your steel-trap of mind? (at least you seem to be out of your normal excuses of years past!)
To further clarify my points, I may see the need for a spreadsheet…I wonder where I can get one of those…Would you happen to know?
War_Eagle-Hockey
August 14th, 2010
10:34 pm
Rawhide – How are the other Thrasher RFA contract talks going. I especially like Afginy Acrhtukin (sp). What a load coming down the wing!!! Would love to have him back.
Rawhide
August 14th, 2010
10:53 pm
War_Eagle-Hockey – I was speaking with C-Viv today and the subject of RFAs came up. He said there really is no real update regarding Little and Bergfors contracts. So we are still waiting, I guess.
As for Artyukhin, I would love to see him return as well. Big guy with deceptively fast speed. However, Dudley made all UFAs that he wanted to return offers in June. He was clear that these players were forwarded deals that he thought matched what their skills warrented. That Arty hasn’t taken him up on whatever offer was made leads me to think he won’t be back.
Sheep
August 15th, 2010
1:14 am
Leave me alone Sage, I’m not into you.
SomaAtl95
August 15th, 2010
1:41 am
I tried, and failed. Oh well.
To those of you who are in the teenage to 40’s who game, NHL 11’s demo hits on Xbox and PS3 on Tuesday. Better physics, broken sticks, new faceoff’s, lots of good stuff on the way. Hope to challenge some of you online. My tag is the same on Xbox and PS3 as it is here.
All we need now is for the summer to officially expire, get our final roster set, and its time to drop some puck. I look forward to joining those of you officially in the “Thrasher Flock” Maybe after the first “You Suck” chant belted this season and before “Lets go Thrashers!” we can all baahhhh like sheep in unison. I’m sure we will also hear a faint donkey bray as well.
Brendan
August 15th, 2010
2:12 am
Sage, I did cringe at my own post, “you cannot fire ownership.” I admit that. Pushing things to their hardcore limit, if a thousand or less showed up for every game, I think that’d be enough to force something to happen. Either (1) the team goes out of business entirely or (2) NHL steps in to run it or (3) the team is sold to someone else. If it’s the third option, the issue of relocation versus winning back this market comes to the forefront.
In a certain sense, who wants the NHL to think Atlanta is a waste of time market? A thousand fans a night makes me think of the Montreal Expos, who were getting six thousand fans in a stadium that sat tens of thousands of them. Major League Baseball had seen enough, and the team ultimately wound up in Washington, DC. At least in the case of the Expos, Alou ran the team pretty well. There was a team with no budget, no market, and no chance … and YET … they managed to go about .500 most of the time. That’s astonishing, given their set of circumstances. The Expos wound up being MLB’s “farm system.” Okay, enough of that. I agree with you, Sage, that the Octocluster more than had its opportunity to see the error of its ways, and to once again treat the Atlanta hockey fan with respect. Instead, Bruce Levenson told STH’s to essentially “shut up and pay full price,” in the midst of an indefensible lack of accountability … and game day discounts to people sitting right next to them.
Admittedly Sage, it took me a long time before I stopped going to a lot of games. It wasn’t until the 2006-07 season before I stopped attending 20 or so games a year. I still couldn’t believe that Waddell got his contract extended. Deep down, I wanted to believe that it was Kari Lehtonen’s fault that the 2006 Thrashers didn’t make the playoffs. Arguably, we saw a very nice winning percentage once the glass groined wonderkind actually made his return, under Head Coach Bob Hartley. On the surface, missing the playoffs by just 2-points certainly points slings and arrows at Kari. But really, Atlanta was the 2nd oldest roster in the NHL that year, coming off of a Lockout where our GM sat on the Rules Committee, and surely must have known that the “new NHL” was one that emphasized youth and speed. Center Marc Savard would not entertain returning to Atlanta, in a season where the Thrashers had a MAX CAP for “Opening Night.” I remembered thinking, “That jerk, Savard! Why won’t he re-sign? He’s a vital part of our future. We’re spending a level that reflects serious pursuit of the Cup.” In the end, whatever his reasons, Marc Savard left. And the organization got nothing for the asset, as they opted not to move him at the trade deadline in favor of the stretch-run for the playoffs. At the time, trading him in a “salvage mission” probably would have been met with an irate fanbase. It was a close run. It was arguably worth taking a shot at it.
To me, Sage, my epiphany … occured in 2006. Which was, admittedly, “a little late” not to realize the score. Truthfully, I was surprised that Waddell survived the Lockout as GM. Then there was the Heatley trade. But prior to that, the wooing (and eventual signing) of Peter Bondra and the signing of Bobby Holik as out “big free agent move” of 2006. And, of course, the Ilya Kovalchuk “RFA holdout.” I was extremely upset at the time … that Kovalchuk wasn’t the very first move made by Waddell, the moment the Lockout was resolved. I posted in anger, back in 2005, “With this kind of treatment, this guy will be gone the second he can hit the open market in 2010.” Boy did I hear about it!, from the other posters. People called me a “hate monger,” among other things. I really didn’t want to be right about that. I never wanted to be more wrong in my life. But, as it turns out, Kovy’s departure could turn into a blessing in disguise. I’ve certainly cut the cord, embracing more of a depth strategy. But I’m off point. In 2007, it was an utterly indefensible move to renew Waddell until 2010 as GM, after mortgaging the future for a division title and playoff berth that resulted in zero wins. That was it, for me, in terms of even thinking of going to 20 games a season. When I heard Bernie Mullin get on “680TheFan” to spout some “John Wooden longevity theory” about why retaining Waddell was essential for the future of the team, I lost it, man. It was that, “You’ve got to be kidding me! .. you CANNOT be serious” John McEnroe moment. As in, “That ball was on the line. There’s chalk flying everywhere,” towards the umpire. In October of 2007, it was Hartley, not Waddell, who got fired. I found it completely exasperating that there wasn’t an utter housecleaning in April of 2007. To even try to make it all “Hartley’s fault” seemed really distasteful. Waddell, ultimately, fared not much better, after coaching the team for 76-games to 76-points. With, mind you, bluster about the playoffs still in full effect, in December. Allright, I’m just gonna stop there. We all know the history. And very soon, I’ll be accused of negativity for presenting facts about the team. Sage, I don’t know what to say. I’ve wanted this ownership fired for a long, long time, in favor of one that would honestly and properly care for this franchise. To an extent, I certainly agreed with them that, back in 2007-08, the proper course was to engage in a rebuilding project, which others corrected me in saying was a “building, not re-building project.” I just couldn’t conceive that we’d have the same architect holding the blueprints. Fan attendance has been ‘what it is,’ Sage. Philips Arena got bluer and bluer with the empty seats at Blueland, while the PA declared 14,000 seats purchased for tonight’s game. The ownership survives, Sage. Propped up by revenue-sharing dollars and league minimum budgets, the Thrashers survive. They endure. It’s rather remarkable, especially when one wonders, season-in and season-out, just how “committed” this ownership is to winning a Stanley Cup.