Dealing with situation in goal will be high on Dudley’s summer to-do list

The common logic surrounding how to build a quality hockey team is to start in goal and work your way forward. To this point, many Thrashers fans will point to the area between the pipes as to why the first decade of play has led to the results they have. The lack of a solid, dependable, stable situation in goal has played a major role in nine out of ten seasons ending after the 82 scheduled games.

In keeping with this line of thinking, I do believe that how new GM Rick Dudley handles the goaltending situation here in Atlanta will go a long way in determining how the team he ices this coming season will fare. And, just after whom he picks for a new head coach, it could be the most important decision he makes during this offseason. So let’s discuss some of the options available to Dudley and Co.

Opie and the Moose Redux?

To date, Dudley does not have a goalie signed to play next fall. Veteran netminder Johan Hedberg will become a UFA on July 1 while Ondrej Pavelec will be an RFA. So what are the chances the new GM opts to bring back the pair for another season as the goalie tandem in Thrasherville? Well, it’s a situation he has said he is comfortable with.

Johan Hedberg played in 47 games for the Thrashers last season, starting 42 of them. He will be a UFA Juy 1 (AP Photo/Don Heupel)

Johan Hedberg played in 47 games for the Thrashers last season, starting 42 of them. He will be a UFA Juy 1 (AP Photo/Don Heupel)

After the first couple of months, Moose handled the bulk of the work last season and performed admirably…starting a total of 42 games and playing to a record of 21-16-6 with a .915 SV%, 2.62 GAA and 3 shutouts. Opie started the season well, but then fell off during the winter month before ending the season on a better note. Overall the young Czech went 14-18-7 during 40 starts and had a .906 SV%, 3.29 GAA and a pair of shutouts.

I don’t think it’s a stretch to think the team will look to re-sign Pavelec and have him return next year…the question is whether or not he’ll return as a starter or backup.

My guess would be that Hedberg… who’ll be 37-year old by that time… would start the season off as the main man in net with the plan of working Pavelec into that top spot as the year progresses. This was much the same idea the Thrashers had five years ago heading into the 2005-06 when they looked to Pasi Nurminem to help wean the young Kari Lehtonen into the starter role. What happened, of course, was that Pasi’s career came to a premature end when he injured his knee that summer…and Kari was pressed into the role sooner than desired.

But There Are Other Options Out There

However, there are other options out there. One such would be to make a trade for a quality keeper, but that would mean parting ways with quality talent on this end as well. Such a scenario could see talent such as, say, a Bryan Little or a Toby Enstrom caliber asset departing in exchange for such a goalie…maybe even taking with them a pick and/or prospect depending on the deal.

But to me, the better way to bring in a proven starter would be to see what could be obtained in the free agent pool this summer. There are several to choose from, but here are just two possibilities that could fit the bill…one a proven vet and the other is a young star with much promise.

Nabokov The Proven Veteran

First, the proven commodity…Evgeni Nabokov currently employed by the San Jose Sharks. This native of Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan will be 35 years of age on July 25 and is slated to be an unrestricted free agent this summer. He is coming off a contract that paid him $5.375 million this past season. If I had my wish, this is the man we would see ‘tween the pipes this coming October here in Thrasherville.

In his ten-year career, he is 293-178 with 29 ties and 37 overtime losses. He has a .912 SV% and 2.39 GAA with 50 shutouts. To put that into some sort of perspective, Nabokov has only 15 fewer victories and 14 more shutouts than the Thrashers have as an organization…both having played 10 seasons.

In the past three years, his regular season numbers are 46-21-8 with a .910 SV%, 2.14 GAA and 6 SO in 2007-8…41-12-8 with a .910 SV%, 2.44 GAA and 7 SO in 2008-09…and 44-16-10 with a .922 SV%, 2.43 GAA and 3 SO this past season.

After he and the Sharks ousted the Colorado Avalanche Saturday night, he is now 36-33 lifetime in the playoffs with a .916 SV%, 2.19 GAA and 7 shutouts. That’s right…his career saves percentage and goals allowed stats are actually better in the playoffs than those in the regular season.

This post-season has been no exception as he has been stellar again so far. In the six games vs. the Avs, Nabokov netted a 1.76 GAA a .926 SV%. Tossed in was the 28-save shutout last Thursday night to help the Sharks take a 3-2 lead in the series.

Granted, Nabokov has backstopped a defense that allows much fewer shots on goal than the Thrashers’ blueline let up…in fact, during the past three seasons San Jose has averaged 27.6 SA/G while Atlanta has allowed 33.2 SA/G…but that serves only to accent the importance of procuring such a high-caliber goalie.

Of course the big question with Nabokov is…could he be persuaded to sign with the Thrashers? Well, I guess that all depends on how well Rick Dudley and [insert name of possible new head coach] can sell the organization. It also could depend on how much Dudley would be willing to pay the Calder Cup-winning/All-Star goalie.

Could Price Be Right For Dudley?

Another option to kick around is a younger goalie…someone like Montreal’s Carey Price. This 23-year old product of British Columbia is slated to become an RFA this summer.

Who would you like see as the Thrashers top goalie?

  • Johan Hedberg (15%, 18 Votes)
  • Odrej Pavelec (8%, 9 Votes)
  • Evgeni Nabokov (40%, 48 Votes)
  • Carey Price (19%, 23 Votes)
  • None of the above (18%, 22 Votes)

Total Voters: 120

Loading ... Loading ...

He lost his starting role to Jaroslav Halak this past season, (who will be an arbitration eligible RFA this summer)…appearing in but 14 games since New Years after playing in 37 prior to that. He finished the season with a record of 13-20-5 with a .912 SV% and 2.77 GAA.

For his career, he is 60-48-18 with a .912 SV%, 2.73 GAA and 4 shutouts.

His rookie season saw him play to a 24-12-3 mark with a .920 SV, 2.56 GAA and 3 shutouts. In two rounds of playoffs that year he played in 11 games, going 5-6 with a .901 SV%, 2.56 GAA and a couple of SO. Last year when he and the Canadiens were swept in the first round by the Bruins, he had a .878 SV% and 4.11 GAA… but the Habs were allowing a Thrasher-esque 32.5 SA/G during that series.

Overall his post-season numbers are 5-11 with a .895 SV%, 3.19 GAA and those 2 shutouts from the spring of 2008.

Price’s current contract pays him 2.2 million and he will be 24-years old in August. He’s played his entire three-year career under the hot lights of the Canadiens’ fan base & press corps…maybe he’s one of those that could benefit from a change of scenery.

And What About The Chicago Connection?

And finally, we have one last option to consider…the goalies currently minding the nets for the Chicago Wolves. 26-year old Peter Mannino compiled a record of 26 wins, 5 losses, 3 shootout wins, and 1 shootout loss with the AHL Wolves this past season and had a .921 SV%, 2.34 GAA and 2 SO while Drew MacIntyre was 20-17-1-2 with a .917 SV%, 2.54 GAA with 3 SO. MacIntyre will be 27-tears old in June.

Mannino has 3 games of NHL experience as a New York Islander while MacIntyre has 2 with the Vancouver Canucks. Given that, I would prefer the Thrashers to stick with either Hedberg or shop for some other proven veteran.

147 comments Add your comment

Zim

April 25th, 2010
7:47 am

Not even a mention of the other free agent goalies available this offseason?

Marty Turco, Jose Theodore, Chris Mason, Dan Ellis, and Marty Biron are all more stable, proven options than the Hedberg/Pavelec combination Thrasher fans witnessed last season. Mason and Theodore may re-up with their respective teams, but Turco, Ellis, and Biron will likely be available July 1.

Nabokob may be the cream of the crop this offseason, which probably means the veteran Russian is out of the Thrashers league in the free agent market. Atlanta seems to be targeting free agents, at least in the last couple of seasons, that are just a step below the league’s elite and looking to cash in on a first or second go-round at UFA status.

Dan Ellis is a guy that features not only a stellar Twitter Feed, but the attributes of a starting goalie that could help nurse the young, inconsistent Ondrej Pavelec along.

I’d be extremely surprised if the Thrashers decided to go with Carey Price over Pavelec. Price’s numbers are not drastically different than Pavelec’s and that comes with a better team around him in Montreal the last three years.

HookyBob

April 25th, 2010
7:50 am

I think whichever goalie Montreal will let go is a good choice. Seems to me that Price has a bit of a reputation that he can be “rattled” though (I’d still take him).

Marty Turco, or Marty Biron might be good choices for a year or two while seeing if Pavlec develops further.

Are there any records on how goalies do in shootouts? Seems to me Pavlec was very “ungood.” For a team that is stilling fighting for a play-off spot 5 days before the season ends,..that is something to look for.

Finally, I’d take a good look over in Europe for any established, or rising Finnish goalies. They seem to manufacture them at a high rate.

Tom (Capital T Tom)

April 25th, 2010
7:55 am

Part of me is intrigued by Mannino coming up.

A great compromise would be to spend Ilya money for 1 or 2 seasons on Nabokov, say 8 mm a year for 2 years, and then let Pavelec and Mannino fight it out as the backup.

Nabakov will not come here with our historically porous defense unless we hire a head coach he can trust or pay him stupid money. I vote spend the stupid money and get him.

He will pay for himself by getting the 1st round playoff money, then it is up to Dudley to build a solid defense around him and hire a coach that will teach said defense to the players.

R. Stroz

April 25th, 2010
8:34 am

The Thrashers need a real goalie coach.

This team has suffered from poor goalie development for years because Waddell chose his former college roomie, Steve Weeks, instead of getting a real goalie coach.

Tom (Capital T Tom)

April 25th, 2010
8:45 am

Stroz

STOP BEING LOGICAL.

LOL

I wonder if a condition of Dudley taking the job was the ability to fire Weeks?

R. Stroz

April 25th, 2010
8:53 am

Zim –

Turco – No way, he’s being replaced by Lehtonen, that speaks volumes.

Theodore – No way, less consistent than Moose

Mason – A little old for a starter, but not a bad idea.

Ellis – The most likely choice based on our budget.

Biron – Pass

Mr. Awesome

April 25th, 2010
8:56 am

They have a great goalie coach in the organization already. Johannes and as much as I love the moose. He is a backup goalie and that’s it. He has the best attitude of anyone I’ve ever met. He belongs in atlanta but behind the bench

glovesave29

April 25th, 2010
9:10 am

Personally – sign Moose, he’s the known entity within our structure. I am not a fan of Nabokov, for reasons I have stated ad nauseum. We need a healthy and steady locker room. It could be a one year “band aid” until we can move on. as we need to look beyond this off season – there are some good opportunities to get a solid goalie NEXT summer.

Thomas Vokoun – Florida – 32 -UFA after next season
Nothing needs to be said here – the best choice, PERIOD. I dont like to trade within the division – but to get him before he’s a UFA might be a great call.

Ilya Bryzgalov – 29 – UFA after next season
Cant believe PHX once got him for less than a bag of pucks. Second best choice – easy

Jimmy Howard – Detroit – 25 – UFA after next season
Is he a one season wonder, or a product of a great system? Spent a long time in the AHL, but has a tremendous upside.

Jean Sebastien Giguere – Toronto – 32 – UFA after next season
Seems like he is older, but still has a long time ahead of him. Toronto may take some picks for him as they lost so much via the Kessel trade. Big and calm, has a SC.

There are some interesting UFA’s out there –

Dan Ellis – Nashville – 26 – UFA
Solid and reliable.

Ray Emery – Philadelphia – 26 – UFA
Injured this year, but athletic and hungry – has a point to prove after being sent to the KHL

Antero Niitymakki – Tampa – 29 – UFA
We all know what he’s done to us!

We’d have to give something up for these as they are RFA’s, but solid none-the-less…

Antii Niemi – Chicago Blackhawks – 25 – RFA
Solid, now with playoff experience. CHI has cap issues, so they may be willing to talk

Jeff Deslauriers – Edmonton – 25 – RFA
Probably the goalie of the future in EDM, but the Oil has a ton of holes to fill ASAP, and Quinn has been known to be a wheeler dealer.

Josh Harding – Minnesota – 25 – RFA
A good young tender – would have to be a 50/50 guy with Pavs.

Jeremy H

April 25th, 2010
9:14 am

Um… fun fact: his name is Jaroslav Halak, not Havlat (a forward playing in Minnesota).

jimbo

April 25th, 2010
9:26 am

Try to get Nabakov for 2-3 years with big bucks and let Pavs develop as his understudy. Hedberg did a great job in a tough situation but is simply an aging, back-up goalie at best. Time to bring in a coach with a defensive notion (Anderson had no defensive clue) and start with a proven stud in the net. Nabakov shows no signs of slowing down.

Matt

April 25th, 2010
9:27 am

Glovesave-Ray Emery????? Are you kidding me?? What a locker room cancer he would be on this team. No, just NO!

World Be Free

April 25th, 2010
10:03 am

Ellis and/or Jeff Deslauriers make the most sense. On the latter, Edmonton needs cap relief; they are getting alotta pressure to “move forward” as a team. They have a bunch of overpaid guys, like the Bulin Wall. Moose played very well this season. I would have no issue whatsoever in bringing him back in a backup role. Not sure about Nabakov-makes little sense investing in a guy who is 35 years old who wants a Stanley Cup. He won’t get one here in the next 3 years, or more. Biron is backup, no better-he’s past his best years. What about Cory Schneider? He’s rotting in the Canucks system right now.

One more note-on defenseman-Volchenkov played very well in the Pittsburgh series, Hamlius too in Nashville. We need to sign one of these 2 guys, if we are not resigning Kubina. Both would be an upgrade over Kubina, who I like a great deal as a big defenseman.

rob

April 25th, 2010
10:21 am

Nabokov…..too much money, especially to come to Atl from a team that has Lord Stanley potential when he is not getting younger. Now is the time for him to be thinking contender. Gotta think younger or not quite that stature. Don’t even put Nittimaki(sp) in the group to consider. Take us out of his record and he isn’t impressive. An interesting thought that hasn’t been talked about much is Boston’s situation. Rask has probably beat Thomas out there, so do they keep him there or does he look to be moved where he can start next year? I could see this if the price were right, anyone know what he is making? If we are going shopping it will need to be for a proven starter, not a possibility. We have enough of those here in Pavs, Mannino, and a few others.

Brett

April 25th, 2010
10:23 am

Ray Emery is done!. He has the same injury that prematurely ended Bo Jackson’s career. This type of hip injury is devastating to anyone let alone an NHL goalie! PLUS he would be a huge distraction in the locker room.

rob

April 25th, 2010
10:29 am

WBF,
good thought on Nabokov LOL. I think it was you that threw out Thomas’ name first around the trade deadline as well. Watching Volchenkov playing I could see going after him if he was interested, he shows a lot of heart out there blocking shots. Problem being is guys like that are usually loyal, so will he leave Ott? While I like Kubina, I think he looked a bit slow at times, and if he losses much more of his speed he will not be as effective IMO. Haven’t seen Hamlius play. It will be interesting seeing all of the Dmen we have vying for spots in training camp, and also how Zach does next year if he doesn’t have the wrist problem he was said to have had most of this season.

glovesave29

April 25th, 2010
10:44 am

Emery was a bad apple BEFORE his time in Russia. Some people mature later in life, perhaps Ray is in that group. He’s certainly worth the risk

Sherry Taylor

April 25th, 2010
10:51 am

First, I do NOT want to hear anything about bringing someone up from Chicago. Been there and done that and look how well that worked out. I do agree waiting to see who is available come July 1 is a good idea and I’m probably sure that’s what Dudley will do. But, after the series Nabokov had for the Sharks against Colorado, I cannot see them letting him go, besides he’s 35. Why let one ‘old’ guy go for another? Doesn’t make sense. Pavelec will probably be ready by mid-season but what do you do until then? Good question. Be smart is the answer, but this club has not always shown that they can be.

I’m reminded of Waddell’s inability to keep good players everytime I watch a play-off game, just for example–Pasquel Dupuis. Let us hope that Dudley has a better instinct and ability to keep good players around.

Flagstaff

April 25th, 2010
11:11 am

The question is not “Should Dudley pick up a top-tier goalie?” as much as it is “Will he?”, and I don’t think he will. The choice to move Lehtonen shows the organization’s confidence in Pavelec as a future #1 goalie. (Although this was during Waddell’s tenure, Dudley was still present and obviously had a hand in getting Vishnevskiy (sp?) in return.) And I don’t see them passing on Moose after the season he had. I’d look for them to wait until 2011 to try and get a new goalie.

As for a new top forward, I don’t see the Thrashers going after Marleau, Plekanec, or any other top-name man, simply because of a limited budget and the fact that not many people want to come here anyway. Perhaps Antropov could try to talk his pal Ponikarovsky into coming here.

As for defense, I really don’t see too many adjustments coming up. He seems to like the top 4 we have already.

The biggest difference will come in coaching. There aren’t too many people available right now, but only time will tell here.

Anyway, I hope Dudley can prove me wrong about some of these theses…

R. Stroz

April 25th, 2010
11:29 am

If Waddell would have had the intelligence to bring in a real goalie coach instead of a college cronie, I wonder if Lehtonen would have bloomed.

If you’re Lehtonen and your “goalie coach” is little more than the GM’s stooge, what motivation do you have to develop?

No accountability as a coach spreads.

Joe Friday

April 25th, 2010
11:59 am

It’s a no brainer to go after Nabokov as your top target. It’s the quickest way we can turn this club around, to finally have a true #1. All the other UFAs are no better than Moose, so might as well keep Moose than go after one of them as Moose is great in the room.

Nabokov and we have a competitive club instantly.

World Be Free

April 25th, 2010
12:04 pm

rob, you are correct, I did toss out Thomas at first amongst others. But I am thinking more about the long term effects of bringing in a goalie that wants to be here long term, vs. an old guy that’s looking for a check for a season or 2 or 3. We need Jeff Deslauriers, Cory Schiender, Ellis or someone younger to build on for the next few years.

Stroz on Kari-I still think the problem with Kari was his heart, will and desire to be a number one. His issues were always pulled muscles and spasms. I never saw the physical dedication it takes to be a number one. The things that nobody can teach; you have to have it in your heart.

Defenseman-not sure what Volchenkov thinks of Ottawa, since they haven’t been able to get a deal done yet. Siedenberg is another one; I suggested him last summer, then he went to Florida and became a mainstay. They like him in Boston too, though I am not certain the Broones have enough cap space to keep Siedenberg.

Alan R.

April 25th, 2010
12:13 pm

[Carey Price] lost his starting role to Jaroslav Havlat this past season, (who will be an arbitration eligible RFA this summer)

Pretty sure you mean Halak, Bill, as the only Havlat I’m aware of in the NHL plays for the Wild. :P

R. Stroz

April 25th, 2010
12:35 pm

WBF – Kari has motivation issues. However, why draft a young goalie requiring development if you have no one to do the job.

Weeks was the equivalent of having Waddell’s college beer buddy turn a young man into a world class goalie.

If you don’t have a real goalie coach, well you better get a veteran goalie who already knows the ropes.

And, to make matters worse, Waddell’s beer buddy was ruining another goalie, Pavelec.

With no offence to glovesave, when a blogger can see and knows how to address fundamental proper positioning flaws better than the goalie coach, unmitigated disaster is the result.

When anyone else consider Kari Lehtonen’s career and Pavelec’s development, or lack thereof, to be an unmitigated disasters? I would.

Thrashfan01

April 25th, 2010
12:58 pm

Nabby – is a no based on money. While he is the class of the UFA goalie pool the cost, 5-6 mil per is so far out of our budget it simply makes no sense.

Ellis – Makes the most sense. At 29 he is actually coming into the right age. At 2 mil this year Ellis is well within the Spirit Budget.

Price – a no because we would have to give up assets.

Moose – Knows the organization. This season was a career year but as a backup and mentor at a bit over one mil per the ptice is right. If he would become an organizational coach he would be perfect and if we had a rash of injuries he could don the pads.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
1:05 pm

My goaltending idea is to the sign the BEST AVAILABLE UFA netminder “actually willing” to sign with Atlanta. And I don’t particularly care if we OVERPAY to get him. Maybe that’s Nabakov. Maybe it’s Roloson or Biron. Maybe we get a #1 guy via trade? I’m not opposed that, provided that the goalie traded here wants to play here, and had remaining years on his contract. I don’t someone in mind, when I mention that.

There are some surplus goalies. I see Niemi, not Huet, in the Chicago net. I see Tuukka Rask, not Tim Thomas, in the Boston net. I see Varlamov, not Theodore, in the Capitals net. I see Halak, not Carey Price, in the Habs net. I doubt Ottawa would move Elliott. And in the cases of Elliot and Carey, or even Halak, are they bonafide #1’s? Maybe in Elliot’s case, the answer is yes.

What about Deslauriers, in Edmonton? Not exactly firmly established, either, maybe worth taking a long hard look-see. Deslauriers went immediately after Jim Slater in the 2002 draft, 31st overall, the first pick of the 2nd round. Deslaurier is 6′4, 200 pounds, catches right. He’ll be 26 years old on May 14th. I hear ya … “late bloomer?” Well, if we do get him, at least didn’t invest the years developing him. We can thank the Oilers for that.

Rawhide

April 25th, 2010
1:36 pm

Jeremy H and Alan R. – My bad…it is indeed Halak, don’t know why I had Havlat on the brain last night. Post has been corrected.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
1:45 pm

After reading some of the poster comments, I am intrigued by Dan Ellis. Is he withing the “price range” of the Atlanta Spirit? I’m not sure. But I kinda think so.

After thinking it over on Nabokov, and weighing Glovesave29’s post, our resident blog goaltender, I think we do have to forget Nabby as a possibility. Oh, not that Joe Friday’s wrong. He’s not wrong. If we could land Nabokov, I’m for it. I just don’t think Nabokov really believes his best opportunity for a Cup, or another Cup, is here in Thrasherville.

Let’s talk more about Ellis. What do we know about him? You Sabre and Islander fans, chime in on Marty Biron. I don’t Biron so well, to know if he’s a good fit here. But I’m interested. What’s the deal with Roloson? Tim Thomas is a gamble. I don’t rightly know what happened to him this season. Maybe he just saw Tuukka Rask and got demoralized? I don’t know. I need a Bruin fan to chim in, to help me out.

Pavelec, I still like ‘im. I see him as a “work in progress.” Certainly, he’d benefit from a proper goalie coach. Now, as for Moose … you guys know I love him. He’s my 2nd favorite Thrasher, EVER. But he’s 37 in May, and we got a GIFT of a season from him. My $0.02, he delivered what he had left in the tank of his career this past season. And if we go back to the well too often, we’ll find it dry. He’s a career “back up.” Name me another GM who would look to Hedberg to be his #1 goalie in the Fall? If Hedberg doesn’t retire, and isn’t re-signed by Atlanta, he will join another team to be their BACK-UP goalie. I’m fine with carrying three (3) goalies, just like we did this year, if management cannot cut the cord with Johan Hedberg. He can sit up in the presser. I’m okay with it. But it wouldn’t be my first choice.

My 1st choice … is to try to land the BEST AVAILABLE UFA netminder out on the market. My 2nd choice … is to TRADE for the BEST AVAILABLE goaltender on the TRADE MARKET. Absent that, we stand pat with a re-signed Moose and young Pavelec. I am concerned, if we do try to land Carey Price. He’s not really an established #1 goalie. What he is … is very high 1st round draft pick from 2005. That usually means “high pedigree,” but I haven’t really seen it yet. If I had to choose between Halak and Price, hmmn, I guess I go with Halak.

kracker

April 25th, 2010
1:53 pm

Quick hit: I don’t think Nabokov is $5M better than Moose, not unless Duds is allowed to spend to the cap. Even then, I don’t know.

BG33Brown

April 25th, 2010
2:45 pm

I want Vokoun for NJ’s 1st round draft pick. He is a 1 years stop gap at 6M. It would be great for Pav’s plus he should feel comfortable seeing as they plan internationally together a lot.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
3:21 pm

I’d love Vokoun, too. But would Florida do it? They need a goaltender, too.

Two quick goals, here in the 2nd period. One by Phoenix, on a PP. The other by Detroit. Coyotes 2, Red Wings 1, 2nd period.

Adam

April 25th, 2010
3:26 pm

I like the thought of trading for Vokoun, he’s had a stellar couple of years in FLA, but we’d have to give up quite a bit. Also, I think the 6.3 mil cap hit would be to high for us. Chris Mason looks to be a better fit and we don’t have to give up anything. I simply don’t agree with Stroz on Theodore being less consistent than Moose. If Dudley’s budget in in the 5-7 mil for this position and Opie gets 1.5-2 mil then Mason at 3.5-4 mil leaves room for Moose to stay at 1-1.25 mil. Theodore at 5 mil’ish fits what we’re looking without leaving room to sign a 3rd player.

World Be Free

April 25th, 2010
3:32 pm

Stroz – as usual, I totally agree with your contention about the goalie coach situation. I hope we can secure a better coach this time. My take on Kari is that he never had the dedication or commitment to being a number one goalie. You have to be one heck of a coach to “transplant” the desire needed to be an impact goaltender. Maybe a change of venue will help Kari.

World Be Free

April 25th, 2010
3:36 pm

It will take $4-5M to get Ellis. We won’t be the only team going for him. If we want him, we will have to pay for him. He’s a UFA that will sign July 1, no later than July 2.

I am concerned about Pavs as well. Glovesave pointed out long ago that Pavs has some techical flaws that still exist today. His movement freom side to side is poor. A real goaltender coach should be able to correct these issues.

Savannah Blueland Fan

April 25th, 2010
4:15 pm

Let’s put Don Waddell in the net. He’s good at deflections.

kracker

April 25th, 2010
4:18 pm

Darn…been busy today…so I haven’t read everybody’s ideas yet. I’ll get to them later.

Here’s a different take on the going with Pavs and Moose scenario: This is a little unconventional but what I’m kicking around is to sign Moose as coach-player and play him sparingly and enough in practice to keep his skills level up. Pavs is #1 and sign a cheap backup goalie. Or maybe Mannino is ready to backup Pavs. Moose is there and available if the Pavs/backup tandem fails. This means carrying three goalies so they have to be cheap, like all three for maybe $3.5M, about half the salarys of signing an aging Nabakov for $5M + Pavs salary of maybe $2M. This give us goalie options and leaves money to apply to the skaters and d-men. Also, Moose has to be judged to be a good choice for goalie coach and he has to want the job.

I’m fine with trading for a Price for perhaps the NJ 1st and trading Pavs. We don’t need both unless Pavs is content to try to out play Price for the job while earning backup goalie money.

Well gotta go wash and vac the car. I think the pollen haze is finally over.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
5:36 pm

YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS! Coyotes win, 5-2!!! I’d say the “bankrupt” owners of the Phoenix Coyotes will appreciate the revenue produced from hosting not one, not two, not three, but four (4) home playoff games. If you’re scoring at home, that’s a bare bones minimum of $8 million in “100-percent PURE PROFITS” for the owners.

See, Bruce Levenson, that’s the goal. You win … then you make it into the playoffs … then you host series, plural, ideally. Get it?? Bruce turns around, “But Brendan, what does that have to do with basketball? Didn’t you see we lost to Milwaukee last night. Focus, my dear Brendan. Focus on what’s important. The NBA.” “Duly noted,” Mr. Levenson.

Mr. Heat Miser

April 25th, 2010
6:03 pm

Yes it’s all for naught it seems as long as the Octocluster is writing the checks……

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
6:09 pm

Accepting Adam’s post of $3.5 million for Chris Mason, along with $1.5-ish for Pavelec, seems to be a fairly decent return on a estimated earmarked $5 million for goaltending purposes. I like Ellis. But if Ellis will cost $4.5 million, if we’re lucky, plus Pavelec’s $1.5 million, now we’re at $6 million. In this price range, I’d say we take a shot at Nabokov instead, even if it’s to hear the sound of his agent’s laughter, followed by a “You’ve got to be kidding me!” Actually, rubbin’ my chin, agents like to use the Thrashers to drive up the price of the intended destination of their clients. So, they’d welcome our inquiry.

If Ellis could be had for $4 million, Pavelec for $1.5 million, and Moose for $1 million, at least that’s some “depth” for $6.5 million. Maybe it’s best to look at Chris Mason some more. I guess we’d be allright with a tandem of Mason and Pavelec, for $5 million combined, with Mannino as the fallback, in case of injury.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
6:22 pm

WBF, just out of curiosity, what would cost for Biron? He’s not my #1, by any means. But I see him as someone who might be un-signed on July 2nd or July 3rd. That means … we might actually have some shot at him. I still like the idea of Deslauriers, out of Edmonton, too. Hold up. I know what you’re thinking. “Why would Jeff want to come here?” Well, first of all, it’s about 50-degrees warmer on average. I tease. I kid. Also, when you’re dog runs away in Atlanta, it doesn’t take 3 days to chase him down. Edmonton finished 30th out of 30. Atlanta wasn’t nearly as bad as all that. What’d we finish, 23rd? 24th?? 22nd?? Somewhere in this viscinity. It’s a better situation, now at least, then what he prospectively faces in the frozen wilderness of Alberta. I think Deslauriers may be ready to finally blossom, as a 2002 draftee. At least we didn’t spend the years developing him. It’s just a passing thought.

Savannah Blueland Fan

April 25th, 2010
6:22 pm

My shocking family secret: I grew up in southwest Michigan from a mixed marriage. Yep, one side of the family roots for Chicago and the other side (those used-to-be Canadians we DON’T invite to picnics) roots for Detroit. This has been a wonderful weekend for me!

Sticking with my original prediction: Blackhawks defeat the Caps in 5 games.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
6:32 pm

Is there an L.A. Kings fan up in this house? Talk to me about the situation between Jonathan Bernier, 11th overall pick from 2006, Jonathan Quick, and Erik Ersberg. They cannot keep them all. I suspect Ersberg would be the odd man out. But if somehow Quick were the one shown the door, he might be an interesting consideration. I don’t know his contractual situation. I also don’t know how far away Jonathan Bernier is from becoming the Kings’ # 1 goalie.

mutton

April 25th, 2010
6:36 pm

Hahahaha Brendan, love the not-so-hypothetical conversation with Bruce L. Very well played, sir!

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
6:40 pm

By your liege, mutton. :)

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
6:55 pm

Before the topic passes entirely, I’ve never like pick # 22 in any draft year. (Okay, I only said that to make the geeks go scrambling to defend their favorites, selected at 22nd overall. That should keep them busy, eh? I fully expect them to emerge with a HERO, and a declaration of what AN IDIOT I am.) That said, I’d like to package that pick. Said another way, “I don’t trust Dan Marr and Waduddley to find someone GOOD at # 22.” If we could trade # 22 for an RFA, it might turn out okay. For those wanting Halak or Price, from Montreal, this pick, plus some prospect either in Gwinnett or Chicago (AHL) might just do the trick.

Personally, I’m leery of going after either Halak or Price. They’re just not established enough yet. A better bet than what’s on that draft board at # 22?? Maybe so. Maybe so.

glovesave29

April 25th, 2010
6:57 pm

Not sure you want to carry 3 goalies, the only way to stay sharp is to play. Practices just don’t cut it. I doubt anyone that comes is going to be OK with being either in the press box or being sent down to the AHL – plus they’d be subject to the waiver wire, so you’d likely lose him anyhow. That’s why you stick with the current combo for another season and go after Vokoun or Giguere next summer.

Brendan – my problem with Pavs is not his lateral movement. To be honest, that is his strongest suit. Its that he does not move under control. He overcommits and takes himself out of position. He moves across in his butterfly and leaves the net wide open. He’s the hockey equivalent of the base stealer who gets tagged out sliding past second…the free safety that falls for the head fake and leaves wide open the receiver with a 50 yard touchdown. But I certainly agree that he’s a victim of not having the tools to succeed, he needs a good goalie coach. Why do you think Toronto is getting people to come there? The weather? The great team? Goalie guru Francois Allare?

I can see LA purging a goalie with little to nothing in return a la Bryzgalov from Anaheim to Phoenix…it’d be nice to take advantage of that…

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
7:11 pm

Glovesave29, I always appreciate your posts. Very insightful. I think it was WBF who cited the lateral movement in his 3:36 PM post. I like Pavelec. I think he’s a keeper for the future. But I’m unsure if he’s ready for a full season of being the # 1 goalie in Atlanta. That’s why my 1st choice is the best available netminder out on the Free Agent market, willing to sign here. If we overpay for either Ellis or Chris Mason, I can live with that. It’s not an ideal situation, but what is??? The Spirit still owns this team. And players talk to each other, behind the scenes.

DanEllisRocks

April 25th, 2010
7:23 pm

A Dan Ellis mention! I’m pysched. And not only is Dan Ellis a solid goalie … he is a hilarious Tweeter (@dellis39 if you don’t already follow him) — if you like that. It’s a great marketing tool. In addition to getting goalies and players — you know, the important stuff. A good social marketing campaign could help the Thrashers too in my opinion. That’s also crucial.

Colby Tweeted for a while and so did Hedberg, but I always got the feeling they were told to stop. Or that they were squelched for some reason. Ellis, is a character. And he’s made a Preds fan out of me. Maybe not the choice we are looking for in goal, but I am going off track.

Marketing is a topic for another day!

World Be Free

April 25th, 2010
7:28 pm

Brendan, my take on Deslauriers is that he wants to stay in Edmonton, even though he had to play for a bad team last year. But the Oilers have 3 goalies including Deslauriers, Dubnyk and the Bulin Wall who is not tradeable. They have to trade someone or lose one to waivers prior to next season. I think Deslauriers would be open to coming here to be a #1 for a new coach that might install and NHL system vs the one Anderson had here last season. Stevens, Ramsay and Torchetti all would be an upgrade over what we had. And let’s hope they bring a goalie coach that is an improvement over Weeks!

Deslauriers and Ellis should be our targets. Nabakov, Turco and Thomas are too old, they are not part of our future. Turco has already made it clear that he wants to go to a team that is close to winning a Cup. We do not have a future #1, unless the new goalie coach can cure Pavs of his ills. Sorry to misquote you Glovesave.

The situation in Los Angeles poses another opportunity. Bernier would be a nice addition, or we can go back to Cory Schneider in Vancouver. No Cary Price though; I just don’t see Price siezing the opportunity to be number one.

On Biron-Marty is a great interview, great teammate, but not a number one. I think he can be had as a backup for his current salary, which I believe is about $1.4M/season.

Stephane Fiset

April 25th, 2010
7:33 pm

Interesting discussion. Would would be having this discussion at all if you could subtract Pavelec’s December performance? Frankly, I think you all are being short-sighted. Goalies, as I discussed before, are either starters or back-ups. Few can exist as both, such as Toskala, whom many people thought was a great find by Toronto but clearly he is not a No. 1 goalie, yet he was a stellar back-up to Nabokov.

So, if you don’t think Pavelec is a No. 1 goalie now, then there certainly is no guarantee he can become one. I do believe he is one and can be a great one with the proper coaching as R. Stroz and others have pointed out. He was rushed to the NHL because of Lehtonen’s injury and now after proving he can play at this level, yet not on a consistent basis, everyone wants to consider alternatives. As I have said over, and over, and over again, this team will not spend anything remotely close to $4- $5- or $6 million for a goalie, and since Nabokov is now in the second round of the Western Conference playoffs, he WILL NOT consider coming to Atlanta at a discount. Why should he?

Move on. And, if you want Price to create a competition between Pavelec and Price, like Montreal did with Halak and Price, how exactly does that work? Like it did in Montreal?

Pick your No. 1 guy and a back-up. Pavelec and Hedberg, Pavelec and Biron. Nabokov and Mannino. Whatever. A competition for the No. 1 spot rarely if ever works. You play one guy 50-60 games and the other guy the balance with no guessing games.

A No. 1 needs stability and a No. 2 needs to know when he’s playing his 22-32 games. That’s the environment that has worked over and over and over in the NHL. Reinventing the wheel in Atlanta won’t work as has been proven for the past 10 seasons.

The only two goalies that started 65 games this year and didn’t make the playoffs: Lundqvist and Kiprusoff, 8th and 10th in save percentage this year.

World Be Free

April 25th, 2010
8:06 pm

Fiset, it would be interesting to see what your primary name is on this blog.

You have an interesting perspective on the situation, I you make some good points. The problem with goaltending, is that it’s the most difficult position on a team to predict. Goaltending is an individual position by nature, impacting the team more than any other position if the #1 does not perform to expectations. We won’t be talking about this if Kari was properly developed and physically trained as he would have been in a better organization. Opie suffers from the same lack of development.

Stroz made the point that many of us have made before-the value of the right goalie coach. Assuming we hire the right goalie coach, we need a number #1 for the coming season to ensure Opie is developed while we are winning games. Could it work with Moose and Opie again? Don’t know, but at least we would know what we are getting for the coming season.

Like you said Fiset, interesting discussion. I hope Dudley can figure it out.

ex-STH

April 25th, 2010
8:22 pm

Nabokov may come here for the “4 year contract” that seems to be the signing contract for a UFA. What’s wrong with $7.5 the 1st year, $6.5 the 2nd, $5.5 for the 3rd and $4.5 for the 4th??? Or a nice round $25 mil for 4 years. Whats that $6.25 per year? Naby would be an idiot not to take that. And remember, he plays like 75 – 78 games per year!!!! After 2 years or so, Pavelec or Marrino would be a great backup or possibly take over as the starter for HALF the games. I say pay the big bucks for a SOLID STARTING GOALIE and others will come when the Thrash start winning. The offense is SOOOO close to being acceptable, it has to start with the goalie!

Rob, I believe Thomas signed for 4 years around $4.5 – $5 mil a year. He is NOT our answer. (He is too much like a perrenial backup with a great attitude like the Moose!).

ex-STH

April 25th, 2010
8:27 pm

The Thrash have plenty of $$$ under the cap without Kovy and Kovy’s $10+ mil

ex-STH

April 25th, 2010
8:28 pm

Sorry, meant Kozy’s $3.5 mil

Smoothie

April 25th, 2010
8:39 pm

I’ve read most of this and it’s a very good discussion of the goalie situation and the numerous possibilities available to management this off-season. Y’all have done a very good job of covering the pros and cons of just about every scenario. Thusly, I will keep this short and give my preferences:

1) Sign Dan Ellis — Ellis and Pavelec do battle “till the death”
2) Trade for Carey Price — MTL needs young defense prospects and they may like the idea of having two 1st round picks between 17 and 22; Price and Pavelec do battle and may the best man win
3) Re-sign Moose if neither of the first 2 scenarios transpire — again, make Pavs earn it in camp. Hope to hell he can, but if he can’t, then Moose gets 55 starts and Pavs gets 35-40. Also, by mid-season, have Duds place a call to his old employer to see how talks are progressing with Vokoun. If talks are stalling or breaking down, see if they would be open to a trade involving Moose, a prospect and a # 1 pick (contingent upon Vokoun signing a LT deal) and tell Pavelec he’s gonna have to wrestle the job away from his countryman.

Obviously, # 3 is the likely scenario and the second part is probably a long-shot. But it has as much chance as happening as Nabakov acutally taking any interest in Atlanta whatsoever. If not for agents, Nabakov wouldn’t even answer the phone when a private number with the area code 404 pops up on his phone this summer.

Lee

April 25th, 2010
8:43 pm

Nabokov has good young talent while still maintaining some NHL experience. His save percentage is 9.10. Not bad. Carey price is an option this year too. He’s really led this team to a new level and got them into the playofffs. But. Nabokov probably is more ready to take on a big challenge. And it’s not easy to be a goalie for a team like the thrashers. You HAVE to have patience.

Hokey Clisters

April 25th, 2010
10:08 pm

It’s going to be an interesting summer for the Thrashers. I hope Dudley has good sense when it comes to goalies. We will find out alot about Duds soon enough……does he think Pavelic is the answer and just needs the right coach or does he go goalie shopping? Obviously, Pavs was inconsistent this year with his reads and technique. I’m going to have to see what type of moves (or not) he makes before I can comment further. The only thing I know for now is that he wasn’t satisfied with the last coaching staff.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
10:16 pm

Roberto Luongo just made the SAVE OF THE ENTIRE PLAYOFFS on Ryan Smythe. Who saw it? Someone find the U-Tube of it. It just happened seconds ago, though, to be fair. Luongo was trapped DEEP INSIDE his own net. He crawled on his stomach and hurled his glove hand forward to snatch the puck from the top corner of the net, while he had his pad vertically in the air.

Amazing!!!!

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
10:42 pm

WBF, thanks for that analysis on Marty Biron. From your description, it doesn’t really sound like he’s any kind of answer for the Thrashers. But like Ron Hainsey, he may be what’s left on July 3rd, should Atlanta still want to pluck a goaler from the free agent market.

Glovesave29, can I pin you down on which UFA netminder you’d want, (1) if price were no issue and (2) if a total goaltender budget (backup & starter) were $5 million or so? Believe it or not, I have zero interest in Marty Turco. Not only will that cost a lot, but I don’t think we’ll really see the result. But, I could be wrong.

Brendan

April 25th, 2010
10:59 pm

Okay, let me just ask it. Where are we, salary cap-wise, in terms of what’s committed for next season? I used to know this if awakened at 3AM on some idle Tuesday. But with the Spirit owning this team, I’ve let certain research aspects of this team slide. That said, we must have money for goaltending. Pavelec won’t cost a lot. Hedberg wouldn’t cost much. Look at the salary that might not be returning?

1. Kubina’s $5 million
2. Kovy’s $6.5 million
3. Colby’s $2.4 million
4. Artyukin?
5. Slater? ($750K)
6. Boulton? ($600K)
7. Hedberg? ($1.25M)
8. Popovic? ($600K)
9. Max Afinogenov? ($800K)
10. Kozlov’s $3.75

I’m too tired to do any math, so you guys do it. Don’t groan at me because you have homework. Just do it. Whatever the heck that adds up to … should be enough to go shopping for a UFA goalie. Of course, I haven’t heard what the salary cap limit is. At last check, it was $56.8 million, with a league MANDATED FLOOR of $40.8 million. I know Kane and Bogosian have some “bonus” money hitting our cap, but let’s also remember that Alexei Zhitnik won’t be hitting our cap anymore, either. Not that the cap hit was devastating, Alexei Yashin style.

Wayne stuck in AL

April 25th, 2010
11:28 pm

I’m sorry, Bill, but we could have the second coming of Patrick Roy and Martin Brodeur, but if we have D-men who are nothing more than human pylons and wingers who can’t backcheck, it won’t matter who’s in goal.

Adam

April 25th, 2010
11:31 pm

Brendan – 23m’ish +Artyukin
7 Forwards that need to be replaced/signed… a goalie tandem in the 8m range leaves 15m to sign those 7 plus 1 top 4 D-man.

Your Mammy

April 26th, 2010
12:10 am

The goalie position is not broke…so dont fix it….sign Hedberg as the starter, Pavelec as backup, then work on the rest of the mess.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
7:45 am

Wayne-agreed,
I hope the next “system” we receive from our new coaches is NHL-worthy. Anderson’s system did nothing for our goaltenders or our overall team defense. There were never any adjustments in Anderson’s system to protect a lead during any game in the season. Coaches have to coach as the games progress. Our coach stood around and yelled out “WTF”.

Smoothie-I like scenario #1 the best, though I think #3 is a possibility. I just don’t want to pay an old goaltender, like Nabakov to come in and try to be a #1. Not sure how much Nabakov has left in the tank. Your body starts to send you signals at 35 and nobody can avoid those signals unless your name is Darrell Green.

Stroz-this weekend reminded me alot of Kari. His counterpart in the NFL, Jamarcus Russell in Oakland just lost his job when Oakland traded for Campbell. Kari and Russell, two guys that have all the tools to be great that refuse to work at their respective crafts. Wasted talents.

Bunny Larocque

April 26th, 2010
8:26 am

Just exactly what “system” has done anything for this team’s defense? Even during the glory year, the Thrashers were 15th in GAA, 25th in shots allowed, Lehtonen’s save percentage was .912, while Moose’s was .898.

In 2007, would you have taken a 36-year-old Martin Brodeur as a free agent? The answer is of course you would have if that scenario was ever presented. He starts a tons of games, his record still solid but his success, like all goalies, has always depended upon the five guys in front of him or the system itself. If you watched the playoffs, he was ordinary to sub par. So, three seasons later you would have gotten 17 playoff games out of him and three straight first-round exits. So, was your team better off having signed him? The Devils never had a young kid ready to push Marty for the No. 1 spot and Lou still is adamant that Brodeur can still play. Of course, he can, but at what price fiscally and developmentally?

Are the Thrashers Cup contenders today? No. Will they be Cup contenders next year? No. Could they become Cup contenders in 2011-12? Quite possibly. So, at that point, do you want a 37-year-old goalie at $6 million in goal, or a 25-year-old in goal?

You don’t win the Cup in 2012 but make a nice run. Would your team be better off with the 25-year-old with invaluable playoff experience ready to lead your team in 2013 or having to start the process all over again by trying to find someone to replace your 37-year-old star who just pocketed $12 million and nothing to show for it?

That’s the real crux of the question isn’t it? It’s not about 2010-11 necessarily, but beyond. If your mindset is just making the playoffs, that’s one thing (see: 2006-07), but if your goal is overall development of a franchise, that’s another thing altogether.

Thanks to Stephane Fiset for sharing his blog space with me!

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
8:39 am

Wow, Stephane Fiset and Bunny Larocque made an appearance on Rawhide’s blog! Cool!

The word “choke” is overused Brendan and not applicable!

Nashville was down 3-1 on Saturday and as mentioned they scored three goals to take the lead and once they did could have salted it away had the final 90 seconds gone a little differently. I was incredulous that while on the power play and the clock clicking down that Shea Weber made a d-to-d cross ice pass rather than simply dumping the puck to the corner. I was flabbergasted that Erat tried to no-look a pass out in front rather than just hold the puck and let more time go off the clock. They were crucial mistakes with a man advantage not a choke.

A choke would have been missing a wide-open empty net goal with less than a minute remaining, not hustling back and watching the Hawks score the game-tying goal. That didn’t happen.

Labeling that loss a choke doesn’t do justice to the fact that the Preds never quit, stormed back and put the Hawks on the verge of being down 3 games to 2 and having taken two of the three games in Chicago. They final minute was brutal but I don’t think it’s right to say it was a choke. Stupidity yes. Bad coaching no. The players have to recognize the situation and make plays based upon the situation. They didn’t. screwed up and lost.

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
8:40 am

Leaving for Nashville at 2 pm. Can’t wait!

Dwayne

April 26th, 2010
8:46 am

is no longer the issue. Torchetti will coach and he will bring Chicago’s goalie coach with him. Mark it down.
As for the cap and how much the spirit clowns will spend depends on how far the Hawks go. I know a lot of yall do not care for basketball, but for the Thrashers best intrest, pull for the Hawks, I know it hurts, but just think of it as pulling for the Flyers to beat NJ.

Dwayne

April 26th, 2010
8:47 am

John Andersons system is no longer an issue…..sorry

glovesave29

April 26th, 2010
9:05 am

Bunny Laraque – ha! Great name, remember him well. He’d always suit up against the Flames and I’d be bummed that I would not get to see my boyhood hero, Ken Dryden play. That is, after all, why I play the net and wear number 29.

I think you are not looking at the big picture. If we sacrifice the team as a whole to make sure we are getting Pavs experience, that is one helluva a roll of the dice. What if he “craps out” and we have wasted that time? What if he pulls a Pasi Nurminen and never plays again? Make it even harder to attract FA’s with that mentality, too. Crowds grow even smaller…I mean why pay for a ticket to a team that is only there to give a goalie experience and not play to win? I just want the situation to be static one more season with Moose in the net. If his play improves, give Pavs 55% of the starts this season. Moose does his farewell tour. Gives Ondrej one more season to prove he hase the mental capacity and physical conditioning to be a full timer in the NHL. Give him a good goalie coach SOON and lets see if he can be a Matt Ryan and throw himself completely into his craft. A regular rink rat.

DWTOO

April 26th, 2010
9:09 am

IMHO:

1) Sign Dan Ellis and Pavs. Let them battle/rotate who’s got the hot hand.

2) Sign/trade – Carey Price and Pavs. See # 1. Think a change of scenery would do Price good. Similiar to trading Lehts.

3) Don’t sign or trade for a 35 yr. old. Might as well sign the Moose.

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
9:19 am

“I am intrigued by Dan Ellis”

What, do some of you have man crushers on Dan Ellis for his little twitters about his cute Starbucks runs and yogurt scarfing?!?

Step back and think about it. There’s a reason Dan Ellis is riding for the pines during the playoffs and isn’t the #1 goalie on a club like Nashville. Riddle me this, how exactly does our goaltending get improved by taking a guy who has no better #s than Moose and a guy who is a backup goalie on a club that’s going to be knocked out in the 1st round?

Aim high, this club has never had a true #1 that can steal games and won’t, unless we trade for an established goalie or sign Nabakov (who you know is actually starting for his club and just won a round in the playoffs).

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
9:21 am

“Leaving for Nashville at 2 pm. Can’t wait!”

Take me with you?

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
9:22 am

Bunny, my point is that Anderson did not have a system that incorporated team defense or the design to protect a lead as the games progressed. My hope is that the next coach will incorporate a system that can be altered to protect a lead. That will be up to the next caoch. Most seem to favor Torchetti as the #1 coaching prospect; personally, I favor Ramsay becuase of his experiences as a player and long time coach. Whoever is slected will be an improvement over Anderson.

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
9:41 am

I know your point World Be Free, and as Bunny suggested, the system can protect your goalie and his numbers.

Glovesave29, I’m not saying give Pavs a chance forever, I’m just saying let him get another 40 games and then see where you stand. That’s fair, He’s only had 56 career starts over parts of three seasons and you can’t make a judgment based upon that few number of starts.

Joe Friday: Ellis had 37 starts in 2007-08 and that number has dwindled ever since. Maybe you forgot that he had a save percentage of .938 against Detroit facing 240 shots in six games during that season’s playoffs.

Finally, my crack research dept uncovered the Predators real problem: In their 32 career playoff games, the Predators are converting on just 9.44 percent of their power-play opportunities, 12-for-127 all time and 0-for-21 this year.

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
9:42 am

I’ll be disappointed if Ramsay isn’t offered the Thrashers head coaching position, and doesn’t accept it!

Old Time Hockey

April 26th, 2010
9:54 am

Why would anyone consider bringing in goalies who have had problems with other organizations (Emery, Biron, Price)? If you’ve got a solid #1 and you want to try to revive a career by bringing in a guy like that to back up someone…maybe. But with the goalie curse on this franchise, you need proven stability. Don’t know what the answer is right now, but trying to “rehabilitate” some of these guys would spell disaster. I really don’t think Weeks was the reason Kari was a lazy, immature, unprofessional goalie. That’s the risk of drafting kids…you just don’t know how they will develop mentally. Go out and find a goalie who is a gym/rink rat, who realizes that he will need to work hard every day to improve. Find 3 or 4 of them and decide.

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
9:55 am

“Ellis had 37 starts in 2007-08 and that number has dwindled ever since.”

So the answer in our goal is a guy riding the pines who last saw 37 starts three years ago? The backup on Nashville? And that improves our goaltending? Mmmmkay. Come on, fellas, you’re smarter than this.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
10:00 am

I would not go for Emery or Price.

Biron’s never been a problem for any team he has played for. Marty gets high marks from coaches, teammates, media and fans whereever he’s played. He’s just not a #1 goalie at this point in his career, so if you look to Biron as a keeper, he has to be a backup. But he’ll give you 15-20 games whenever you need them.

Problem with Marty is that he’s such a jacker you can’t shut him up!

LAC

April 26th, 2010
10:08 am

I guess my point of view is, Why bring back guys we have not won with in the past ?

Slater, Boulton, White(Buyout PLEASE), Thorburn come to mind.

We need fresh faces, not more of the same we have seen for years. Heck if that were the case bring back Ken Klee for pete’s sake !!!

We also need a Tough Guy upgrade… AKA… Derek Boogaard, He is 6′8″, 257 and a UFA, he won’t score, but who wants to tangle with him. Or maybe Raitis Ivanans, He is 6′4″ 256. Having those two to CRUNCH cindy crotchby would be very very nice, this would assure NOBODY would push us around without paying for it. They would be cheap to get, downside, they would provide little if any offense, but we need to be TOUGHER and a Tough guy upgrade IS important too !

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
10:15 am

Not saying Ellis is the answer, just pointing out his track record. I’m still in the give Pavelec a chance camp and that means I need a back-up. I’m willing to use Biron, Ellis or Moose in that role.

And no, we’re not smarter than that or we wouldn’t pay any attention to your posts! LOFL

ChippersLoveChild

April 26th, 2010
10:35 am

Biron, my money is on Biron.

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
10:38 am

“we’re not smarter than that or we wouldn’t pay any attention to your posts!”

Just make sure you bring your Fang Fingers tonight, you, you, you you you!

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
10:41 am

Fang Fingers? Nah. But, I do have my 10-gallon hat and Hoss Cartwright vest ready to go!

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
10:57 am

LAC-can’t argue with you on needing new blood. Of the guys you mentioned, I would only consider bringing back Slater at the right price, though you could replace him with someone like Eric Belanger and get a better checker and face-off man.

Boulton gives you all he can as a fighter, but he’s not a heavyweight. Derek Boogaard, would be a major upgrade, nobody would mess with our players. He’d play the same role Goddard does in Pittsburgh. Everyone knows when Goddard is in the lineup and I bet Boogy could kick Goddard’s butt! His influence on how the other team plays may be worth what you don’t get in goals. It’s not like Boulton is a 20 goal man anyhow.

glovesave29

April 26th, 2010
11:13 am

You’re not going to make me go do research to find the hundreds of names across all sports that benefitted from a change of scenery, are you JF? Ellis is a strong and technically sound goalie. Not his fault he’s behind Pekka Rinne, just as it was with Bryzgalov behind Giguere and Hiller. Let us not forget the Rogie Vachon and Tony Esposito were cast aside by Montreal. You saying you wouldn’t take them because another team had no room for them?

I am not giving up on Pavs. He’s got good size and reflexes. He is technically unsound. Here’s where every one throws Hasek at me – but he was TECHNICALLY sound, he just was very unorthodox in his methods, so that arguement doesn’t work. I picked Ondrej’s game apart during the preseason with Bill, Darren Eliot and Matt McConnell over at the IceForum. We were all on the same page, in total agreement. That being said – I do not totally blame him, he is not being given the tools to succeed here – we all know where that blame lies.

glovesave29

April 26th, 2010
11:16 am

…but if you are going to be condescending – Marty St. Louis, Marc Savard, and Brett Hull couldn’t find a spot on Calgary’s roster – you take any of them? Dino Ciccerelli was considered a project coming out of juniors…think you might like him on your team. Things change…people change…that’s why you cannot only look at stats

Dwayne

April 26th, 2010
11:20 am

who needs boogard? or goddard? or bolts? We got Evander “don’t call me holyfield” Kane!!!!

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
11:21 am

Dude, if he can’t beat Rinne out and hasn’t been a starter in 3 years, that’s not a reclamation project at 30 years old, that’s just another backup. We already had one, Moose, that we forced into a #1 role. If you want to put another #2 backup in as #1, then might as well keep Moose, numbers are the same and he’s well liked on the team.

We need a true proven #1, something we’ve never had on this club. Ellis ain’t that guy.

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
11:27 am

lol, here’s Rinne, your next coming of Patty Roy:

Rinne 2.53 GAA .911 Save%

Ellis 2.69 GAA .909 Save%

Moose 2.62 GAA .915 Save%

Moose had a better save % than the Rinne with comparable GAA and Moose did it on a weaker team, yet Ellis who couldn’t beat our Rinne is an upgrade over Moose and going to be the true #1 we need? Hoo boy.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
11:32 am

Right now, Ellis is the most logical choice. He’s at the right age where he has an upside, not to close to an age where he might physically break down. His issue is that Rinne has simply beat him out in Nashville and let’s face it, Rinne has played pretty well this season. Ellis was a proven #1 until someone better beat him out and I don’t see a proven #1 with significant tread left on the tire out there that can be had this year.

Remember that Dominik Hasek was an afterthought in Chicago, traded to Buffalo for a bag of pucks, left unprotected in the 1992 expansion draft. It’s only when Grant Fuhr got injured in Buffalo that Hasek got a chance to be a number one goalie in the NHL. And the rest is history. I am not trying to equate Hasek with any goalie in the mix, just trying to say that sometimes a change in venue brings out the best in a goaltender. Look at Brygolov too. You just never know.

Now I’ll sit back and wait for ya’ll to punch holes in this one!

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
11:33 am

Nabokov just posted a 1.76 GAA (including the 5 he let in during one game), a .926 Save % and posted a shutout while winning the first round of the playoffs this year.

I rest my case, your honor.

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
11:34 am

“Now I’ll sit back and wait for ya’ll to punch holes in this one!”

lol, already did in the post right above yours. Rinne ain’t even an upgrade over Moose, much less Ellis.

FormerIslesFan

April 26th, 2010
11:37 am

Brendan,

Just a quick note here, since the post I’m responding to was from so far up in the blog. I agree with WBF’s assessment of Biron. He is NOT a #1 anymore at this point in his career. It would not serve us to have him unless we specifically want him as a tutor for Pavs, and I don’t think that’s what this signing is about.

On Roloson: Since you asked, Rollie signed a TWO year deal with the Isles last summer, so he under contract through the ‘10-’11 season. Considering DP’s health (or seeming lack thereof), the Isles will not be parting with Rollie any time soon.

My money is still on the Ellis/Price scenarios (although I would still LOVE Halak…I just don’t see him available anymore). Nabakov is unrealistic.

Here’s a unique thought that no one has mentioned: What about trading for Kipper in Calgary? We’ve talked about Iginla since Calgary may “blow up” the team. Why not consider that man with the flaming skull mask??

glovesave29

April 26th, 2010
11:37 am

Nabokov is a “me” guy. I want an “us” guy. That is why I have been saying all along to keep Moose one last season to wait to get Vokoun or Giguere next season. If we insist on making a change now, Ellis is the way to go.

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
11:57 am

Speaking of unrealistic FormerIslesFan…
I don’t see Calgary moving Kipper. He has just played too much hockey since the lockout, averaging 74 starts per season since 2005-06. He’s faced 10,427 shots and has a save percentage of .914. That’s certainly worthy of a $19 million investment over the next four seasons, although at 33 that makes a bit more sense than Nabokov at $6 million.

Adam

April 26th, 2010
12:06 pm

If Pavs is going to be the #1 goalie of the future, hopefully at the start of the 2011 season, then why pay over 12-18mil over 2-3 years for a guy that is going to want to be the starter and not want to be shifted into a backup roll after 1 season? The only way is if there is not a NTC in the contract. Even then it doesn’t make a ton of sense because you’ve got to find someone that will be willing to pickup the balance on an aging goalie.

Mason, Ellis or Moose (In that order) if the bill perfectly for us. I think under the right tutelage Pavs can be everything we expect him to be.

The team lost 15 games by 1 goal this year, of those 11 of them were from Oct-Jan. They also had 13 OTL’s. That’s 43 points!!! Cut those numbers in half and there’s another 21pts or 104 on the year. Good enough for 4th in the standings behind the division leaders. Anyone know how many of those where the blame can be put squarely on goal tending?

Do most of you really think we need to spend over 6 million a year on a goalie over 35 years old right now? I sure don’t. A well put together team that’s got the right frame of mind (ie no prima donna BS) and coached well from game #1 through game #82 will get the job done.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
12:08 pm

Joe, you are saying you’d take Moose over either goaltender in Nashville? Do you want a 35 year old goaltender that has won NOTING in his career despite playing most of his NHL on very good teams? I’d like to see how Nabakov would play and hold out on a team that’s not so good! I am not totally adverse to bringing Moose back, but I truly believe we have to move forward.

FIF, do you think SiPietro is done? If the Isle thisnk so, they may be another “player” in the number one goalie market this summer. I just don’t see Calgary moving Kipper; they have nobody behind him to take his place. Calgary already has created a flawed lineup, I don’t think they create another hole they can’t fill.

Nice wish though!

Brendan

April 26th, 2010
12:12 pm

Red Light, okay. It wasn’t a “choke” as you’ve defined it. But when a team has a man power advantage and merely need to kill the clock, they have to be more ’situationally aware’ than they were. Credit the Blackhawks and Kane with a great effort, but let’s agree to at least call it, “a missed opportunity.” Deal?

Russian

April 26th, 2010
12:16 pm

Does anybody want him as a Coach? I am just wondering.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=527084&navid=DL|NHL|home

FormerIslesFan

April 26th, 2010
12:19 pm

Red Light and WBF:

Hey, I’m not saying it’s a likely scenario (Kiprosoff), I’m just throwing it out there for consideration since no one else mentioned it (probably because it is such low probability). However, if I were Dudley, I would certainly put the feelers out there to Sutter (or whomever will be the GM in Calgary) to see what kind of interest it sparks.

As for DP, I don’t think he is finished and I think the Isles played it VERY cautiously this year. They could, specifically because they had Roloson and Biron in the house and did not have to push DP. When it became clear that DP was not 100%, even though he tried to come back, they shelved him. I think he is not done yet (but he might be able to see the end of the world from where he is standing).

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
12:27 pm

FIF-you are correct, Kippy would be a great catch for most teams looking for an upgrade. I just don’t see Calgary parting with him and if they did, it would cost a ransom to get him. Calgary fans would demand it and Sutter can’t afford to make another bad deal.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
12:29 pm

Russian-WOW! wonder what he’ll be doing for the Devils?

Brendan

April 26th, 2010
12:39 pm

FIF, thanks for chiming in on Roloson and Biron. I wish the Thrashers could be a “chooser” more than a “beggar.” As we roll through these scenarios of free agency, it may turn out that the Ellises and Birons are what’s still left, on July 3rd. We’re just musing out loud. Truthfully, I’m not entirely on anyone just yet.

I agree that Nabby is unrealistic. We’d have to pay him $7 million. And, really, that’s substantively overpaying him. Chris Mason, I don’t have his stats, but he strikes me as an “okay” choice. Ellis, I do think he has an upside. He’s younger than Moose. Would Ellis, necessarily, be our # 1 goalie, moving forward to 2013? Meh. I don’t know. A lot can change between now and 2013. Personally, I hope Pavelec can become that # 1 goalie we hoped he’d be, when we sacrificed the # 12 pick in the 2005 draft to get him. Pavelec still has his whole career ahead of him. If it turns out we do wind up with Carey Price for our pick # 22 or 23 or 24 from the Devils, we have to look at Price that way, too. The easiest solution is the “quick fix.” But Nabokov isn’t coming here.

Kiprussoff, I just can’t see him leaving Calgary, but he’s not a spring chicken anymore, either. He turns 34 in October. Yeah, sure … I’d like to have him. How realistic is it? If Kipper goes, who’ll tend net in Calgary? Flames fans would be furious, I would imagine.

We’re all of us just speculating, for fun. In the end, Dudley will sign or re-sign whomever he does. Hopefully without input from Waddell. I love the Moose. But he’s 37 in May. I just don’t think we can ask or expect another season like he delivered for us this year. Ellis’ numbers may be less impressive than Hedberg’s, but Ellis will be 30 in June. Is Ellis some “end all, be all” solution? No. In fact, if signed, he might wind up being the back up. Is having Dan Ellis as your backup goalie a tragedy? Depends on how much ya paid him, I suppose.

I’m leaning towards Chris Mason and Ondrej Pavelec. If the LA Kings jettison Johnathan Quick, in favor of a tandem of Jonathan Bernier and Erik Ersberg, I’d welcome what Quick can do here. Quick turned 24 in January. I’d say he has quality years ahead of him.

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
12:44 pm

A big missed opportunity Brendan, perhaps of the death knell variety. Situationally inferior, AGREED!

As long as we’re going there World Be Free, which goalies have won something?
Since 1993, they are…
‘09 Fleury
‘08 Osgood
‘07 Giguere
‘06 Ward
‘04 Khabibulin
‘03 Brodeur
‘02 Hasek
‘01 Roy
‘00 Brodeur
99 Belfour
98 Osgood
97 Vernon
96 Roy
‘95 Brodeur
‘94 Richter
‘93 Roy

Interesting, only one finished the regular season with the league’s best goals against average/ Want to take a guess who it was?

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
12:55 pm

Red Light-I can only guess. The man has had a heck of a team around him every year, but San Jose rarely ever gets too far. They are always considered the team that under achieves. Plus, he’s 35 and will take alotta cash to get him to Atlanta.

None of the perceieved available goaltenders is an ideal fit, there’s something about them that is flawed which explains why they are available not locked up for the next decade. Dudley will just have to go for the guy he thinks fits best and that includes on the $$$ side.

Brendan gave us the first Waddell reference for this post! Nice to see he’s moving away from the focus of our many conversations. They may just end up going back to Moose, Pavs and real goalie coach.

Red Light

April 26th, 2010
12:55 pm

Time’s up: Osgood in 2007-08 won the GAA title and the Cup!

glovesave29

April 26th, 2010
1:08 pm

Red Light – funny you mention Osgood – anyone remember the train wreck he was as an Isle? I’ve always felt he was the kind of guy to make a good goalie coach. He isn’t a butterfly goalie (but uses it when necessary) and not a stand up keeper either. Kind of a Brodeur like hybrid.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
1:29 pm

Osgood-right guy in the right situation.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
1:35 pm

JF > Especially for Goalies that are changing teams > “Past Performance is No Guarantee of Future Results”

R. Stroz

April 26th, 2010
1:46 pm

Savannah Blueland Fan

April 26th, 2010
1:53 pm

Re: Russian’s link:

Wh-wh-wha-whaaaaaaat? That was kind of unexpected.

Brendan

April 26th, 2010
1:55 pm

Red Light, enjoy the game. I hope the Preds win, then take the series!

R. Stroz, I saw that, too. My eyes nearly lept off the page. But, if Jacques’ options were be fired or retire, then he made the right choice.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
2:06 pm

Sure, ‘retiring’ is the nicer way to go, if Lemaire indeed was going to be canned. There’s the first expansion of Dudley’s possible coach pool.

DWTOO

April 26th, 2010
2:10 pm

Sign him up! Today! In the word of Denis Lemeiux “Right f’in’ now”!

kracker

April 26th, 2010
2:11 pm

If Duds wants a defensive minded trapping coach, that would be Lemaire for sure. Might work here because I think the Thrash will still be able to score 3 a game out of that system off of PPs, ES goals and neutral zone turnovers.

CA Thrashers Fan

April 26th, 2010
2:20 pm

For those curious as to the Kings’ goaltenders, they will go into next year with Quick and Bernier as 1a/1b tandem, unless Bernier fails to impress in camp. The only goalie available from the Kings will be Erik Ersberg, who is not an upgrade over either Pavs or Moose.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
2:21 pm

Enter your comments here

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
2:22 pm

“Lemaire retired”

See, Kovy IS a coach killer! I kid, I kid . . .

Lemaire only works here if they decide to go cheap and leave a hole in goal again with an Ellis type. We’d need Lemaire’s trapping style then lock down the chances against.

Jameson

April 26th, 2010
2:26 pm

Looks like Jacques Lemaire retired.

World Be Free

April 26th, 2010
2:27 pm

All depends on what Dudely is looking for in a coach. LeMaire has to be somewhere around 65 years old. Rammer is around 60 as well.

Does Dudley want new blood (Torchetti) or experienced coaches (Ramsay, Stevens, LeMaire)?

I thought this wqas the “off” season?

Jameson

April 26th, 2010
2:28 pm

Too many L’s heading up that team. :)

kracker

April 26th, 2010
2:33 pm

WBF – I favor the younger coach…but I felt the same way about getting JA…young, offensive minded coach but his systems failed to produce at the NHL level. OTOH, Is Lemaire the ‘old dog’ coach whose ideas are basically from the pre-lockout days? Dunno…

kracker

April 26th, 2010
2:37 pm

Flip side: Coaches wanting a job can choose to go to NJDevils instead of AThrashers.

Jameson

April 26th, 2010
2:37 pm

Brendan- If I’m not mistaken, Mason is the only UFA goalie above Hedburg besides Nabokov in save %.

Jameson

April 26th, 2010
2:39 pm

Strike that. He was behind Hedburg, who was second in save % among UFA goalies.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
2:41 pm

The Devils blog at HB wants an offensive minded coach. I have one for them: John Anderson is available, he has NHL experience and is an offensive-minded coach. JA and Kovy reunited! lol

Adam

April 26th, 2010
2:49 pm

Jameson – But he faced 344 more shots and slightly edged out Moose in GAA. He’s 33…

Adam

April 26th, 2010
2:52 pm

Shoulda stated he had 14 more starts as well.

Jameson

April 26th, 2010
3:16 pm

Adam- I was actually advocating Mason as at least a second choice to Nabokov.

JimG

April 26th, 2010
3:46 pm

Lemaire! hire Lemaire!

John Anderson

April 26th, 2010
4:36 pm

I CAN TEACH KOVY DEFENSE TOO!!!!

John Anderson

April 26th, 2010
4:39 pm

Is Todd White available??? WTF??? I can turn the Devils around in a heartbeart. No more first round flame outs.

Brendan

April 26th, 2010
5:31 pm

I like it. Keep it coming. If someone put a gun to my head and said, “Name the two goalies on the bench for Opening Night 2010,” I’d probably say Pavelec and Hedberg. But, I’m a fool to dream … that we’ll actually find someone in free agency. It’ll be interesting to see what’s still left on July 3, un-signed. I’m guessing Ellis and Mason will be gone. Biron might still be there. And then … we have to weigh Biron vs. Hedberg as the backup. If we wanted Ersberg, we could probably get him.

Heck, we don’t even know if Moose will retire. But, we’ve nothing yet. If the soon to be 37-year old Hedberg does opt to retire, or play in Sweden, or elsewhere in the NHL, we’ll probably know before the draft in June. Hedberg, if he wants to stay in Atlanta, would probably be one of those Thrashers who would opt NOT to hit the open market, in favor of re-signing. Other Thrashers who I suspect with re-ink, right f’n now, if Atlanta offered a deal, are (1) Slater, (2) Boulton, and maybe (3) Popovic.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
5:37 pm

John Anderson, check your voice mail…Lou may have been calling all day.

John Anderson

April 26th, 2010
6:45 pm

Don called and said he’d put in a good word to Lou for me. Any minute now…Lou? Lou? You there?

John Anderson

April 26th, 2010
6:47 pm

Maybe I’ll take the Deputy Sheriff job in Mayberry.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
7:21 pm

Hey, that’s Barney’s job! Anyway, Dealer Donnie will probably hook ya up with Lou or somebody.

Alan R.

April 26th, 2010
7:53 pm

I can turn the Devils around in a heartbeart. No more first round flame outs.

John, buddy, friend … you need to get to the first round before you can have a flame out.

rob

April 26th, 2010
8:07 pm

The heck with coaching in the NHL, Dumb Wad can give JA a line on a porta potty gig, he threw out enough $hit in interviews all season he should be good at it by now. But when he’s doing that, he should look out for those unlucky bounces.

Ice Daddy

April 26th, 2010
9:20 pm

stendek

April 26th, 2010
9:50 pm

Great hockey night so far! Crying Ryan Miller and Buffalo chokers are gone! Alexander The Ungreat and Washington Crapitals deadlocked with No. 8 seed after six games. Pray overrated bums ousted in front of their arrogant fans. Chicago Chicken Hawks may win tonight but just want Maryann “Cheap Shot” Hosebag hauled off on stretcher! No place for sadistic creeps like this guy in professional hockey. Oh well. Enjoy the finale of evening! ++STENDEK++

Joe Friday

April 26th, 2010
9:58 pm

Yeah, so uh, I can see why you guys would want Ellis. That Rinne is a pretty good goalie, eh? lol. 4 allowed in the 1st, some ridiculously bad play out of Rinne including leaving his net ala Moose in our Blue Skirt series and then the 4th one was just plain awful where he kicked a nice juicy rebound right in the slot for the Hawks to bury it unmolested. And Trotz still didn’t put Ellis in. lol. Mabye he’ll stick him in there to start the 2nd, you’d have to after that 4th goal Rinne let in, just awful.

Brendan

April 26th, 2010
10:36 pm

Unbelievable night in hockey. The Capitals stilllll cannot close out the Habs. A 4-1 loss is cause for concern. Either the Capitals aren’t trying … or they just won’t respect the Habs, or there’s something wrong in that lockerroom. The whole sports reason we play 7 game series … is to ensure the BETTER team wins. Generally speaking, I think that is true. Over seven games, the better team does emerge. The business reason we play 7 game series is … for the money!!! In any event, the series should never get to this point. If the Capitals slip on a banana peel, or suffer from bad officiating, or experience “monkey pucks,” bad bounces, or “ice that’s too slippery,” they’ll be golfing later on this week. Or playing in the World Championships.

And if you’d asked me … if Boston, Philly, or Montreal was a lock to make the playoffs with 10 games left, I’d say, “I wouldn’t count ‘em out, entirely, but it’s all up for grabs.” If you’d asked if if ANNNY of those teams could be in the 2nd round, I’d have laughed hysterically. And now, Montreal is one (1) win away from making all three of those teams second round entrants.

Amazing. Aren’tchu glad we have to play 82 games to establish this playoff field?

While I’m sure some fans are pulling for Montreal at this point, the Penguins will go 8-1 the rest of the way, in East. They’ll sweep Montreal, then beat the Boston-Philly series winner in five games, is my feeling. What a “soft walk” for Crosby and the Pens. I at least want to make the Penguins go through Tuukka Rask to reach the CF, for the third straight year.

In Red Light’s game, he saw seven (7) first period goals. The Blackhawks lead, 4-3. Go Preds!!! I hope it goes seven.

Buffalo??? What happened??? I tell ya what happened. The Sabres failed to close out two games in which they took 2-goal leads into the 3rd period. Had they held on, they’d have won the series, 4-2, instead of the other way around. And now, they’ve got to decide what to do with Rivet, Tallinder, and Lydman. Can’t let ‘em all go, or you’re starting with an essentially brand new blueline for next season. I hope Montador’s still under contract.

Folks, if Montreal wins, we’re in for a snoozefest of a Pens-Habs series. I’d rather see Boston-Pittsburgh and Philly-Washington than Montreal-Pittsburgh, Boston-Philly. Though that Boston-Philly matchup means that someone has to win! What if it’s Philly? Stop. That’d make two years out of three (2/3) for the Flyers being in the Conference Finals, as a 6th and 7th seed, respectively. Remember when they finished DEAD LAST in the NHL in 2007, with 56-points? And Thrashers ownership blustered about how they were in a better position than Philly was the year before they reach the CF? Yeah, well. Forget I said anything.

kracker

April 26th, 2010
10:50 pm

haha I think I agree w/ stendek!?! well sort of, I don’t think Hossa is cheapshot artist…and I’m only for bruins because some ppl i Know are for them…

haha Ice Daddy, I saw where Max was join a pickup game in AL but did he really score 17 times?!? lol

HookyBob

April 26th, 2010
10:52 pm

Ice Daddy, here’s some more detail on Max playing pick-up hockey in Birmingham.

http://blog.al.com/ray-melick/2010/04/melick_fed_cup_lures_mad_max_t.html

Smoothie

April 26th, 2010
11:32 pm

Wolves win their gm 7 giving young guys more valuable post-season exp. Morin may get an ATO to play his first pro games. Certainly bodes well for his chances going fwd.

Rawhide

April 26th, 2010
11:47 pm