Which White Will We Witness This Season?
If I would have told you a year ago that Todd White would account for 73 points in the upcoming season, chances are you would have laughed me clear out of the blogosphere. He was coming off a very lackluster 14 goal, 23 assist performance in his first season in Atlanta and his soft play…most notibly on the defensive side of the ice…earned him the nickname “Charmin” around these parts.
Prior to his arrival in Thrasherville, in the two seasons he played with the Minnesota Wild, White scored 19 goals and 40 points during 61 games as well as 13 goals and 44 points in 77 games. He was a -1 and +8 in his two years there as well. In fact, heading into last season, the most productive year Whitey ever enjoyed in his NHL career was in 2002-03 when he netted 25 goals and 35 assists for 60 points while playing for the Ottawa Senators. He was a +19 that season.
So as you can see, to have predicted such an effort from White…espcially playing for a team that was coming off a 76-point effort the season prior…would have gotten you some very long odds in Vegas.
However, to his credit, that’s exactly what he did.
Todd White's career-high 73 points were almost double that of the previous season (AP Photo Gregory Smith)
He began the year centering the team’s second line with the veteran Slava Kozlov to his left and the youngster Bryan Little to his right. For the first half of the season that was the most productive and reliable line the Thrashers put out there. He and Little finished off the season with Kaptain Kovy on the top line. The 22 goals last year were not tops for White, however his 51 assists and 73 overall points were.
But the big question that I have about the 5′-10″. 195-pound native of Kanata, ON is…which Todd White are we more likely to see this season?
The one that surprised us all with the career-high 73 points or more of last year?
The one that was all but invisible on the ice two seasons ago?
Or, and this is what I believe…something in between?
Remember, last season was a “career” year…and one such campaign does not necessarily guarantee a follow-up performance at the same level. Certainly I don’t think we’ll see the pedestrian numbers that he put up in his first season in a Thrashers uniform, but I can’t say I’m quite as confident that he’ll match…or top… last year’s either.
Of course, much of that could depend on where he spends his time in the lineup. If the Thrashers don’t make any other major moves to acquire another forward, I would think we would see White, Kozlov and Little form the team’s second line again…and that would be just fine with me. If that is the case, then I think White and that line can be very productive once again.
For the record, I’d like to see Peverley playing the pivot between Kovy and Antropov on the first line.
However, if certain rumors are true and Atlanta brings in, say, Nikolai Zherdev…then that would shuffle things around on the top two lines. Kovy, Antropov and Zherdev could very well be your first line…then the second line could be something like Kozlov, Peverley and Little. If so, then White might be playing down with Reasoner and Armstrong. Is that any way to reward a player’s career year?
Now, some might say to leave White between Little and Kozlov…then place Peverley on the third line. But I think that would really be a waste of Pevs abilities.
Besides, either way you go with that, where would you play Evander Kane? In either scenario, your answer would have to be…Vancouver.
Now please don’t misunderstand me, none of this is at all meant to be a slam on Todd White and I’m certainly not trying …ahem…put the squeeze…ahem… on the player formerly known as Charmin. Like I said prior, I do not believe we’ll see a return to the 2007-09 type of numbers for him. But I’m also skeptical of seeing 73 again as well…though I’d love to be wrong.
Given all that, I’ll throw this matter out to you placing the over/under line on his total point production this coming season at…65.
Look…It’s Rawhide In Russian!
I was recently “cyber-interviewed” by Vadim Kuznetsov who writes for Tribuna.Sports.Ru…and here is the link to his writeup. I warn you though, it’s in Russian. So maybe our friend and frequesnt contributer “Russian” might help us out with the translation, eh?
Anyway, the subject matter includes this summer’s moves by the team, Kovalchuk’s re-signing and how I think the team will do this season.
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
149 comments Add your comment
World Be Free
August 29th, 2009
9:14 am
I can’t believe I am doing this-FIRST!
World Be Free
August 29th, 2009
9:19 am
Not much about Todd White’s game that really thrills me. I quietly said to myself this summer that an upgrade of Todd White would be beneficial to the team. Doesn’t sound like Thrashers’ fans want to consider getting rid of any of the current regulars. Just look at Jimmy and his legion of supports.
Let’s hope Todd picks it up this year. Frankly, I think we have seen the best of Todd White. Malholtra would have been an upgrade.
Nikita
August 29th, 2009
9:25 am
I love Todd White, and have since about 3 months into his time on the team. I don’t know that we’ll get 70+ points out of him again, but I will be surprised if he doesn’t go north of 50. Which is plenty if the rest of the team pulls its weight.
In his favor:
1. He’s cheap.
2. Kovy likes him.
3. He’s currently our best all-around player and is an asset defensively, offensively, and on special teams.
Kanata Supporter
August 29th, 2009
11:01 am
Your story is so wrong, you are sooo pushing to get White traded. He was for the most part the Thrashers best player last year!!!! Peverly is a bum!!!
mutton
August 29th, 2009
11:22 am
I think 60+ is reasonable to expect from him. He registered 50 assists and that aint a fluke. Maybe he doesnt repeat, but were I he, Id expect at least 45 assists from myself. If his goals total drops off I think we see about 50 points from him, but if he sticks near 20 goals I think we might well see 65-70 points from him.
Just outta curiosity, I looked up how many times a Thrasher has topped 50 assists in Thrash history: Whitey and Kozzy this past season, nobody in 07-08, Hossa, 57, and Kozzy, 52, in 06-07; Savard, 69, and Hossa, 53, in 05-06; nobody in 03-04, but Kovy led with 46; nobody in 02-03, but Kozzy led with 49 with Heater one back at 48; nobody in 01-02, and Heater was the only one with more than 30 at 41; nobody in 00-01 but Ferraro led with 47; nobody past 30 in the inaugural season.
Smoothie
August 29th, 2009
12:11 pm
Ill take the under Rawhide, but just south of 65. I like 20 goals and 40 to 45 assists.
ben
August 29th, 2009
12:23 pm
pevs is no bum!
over on the assists, kovy will be a goal machine this year. Any truth to that interweb rumor that las vegas will land the yotes? myself i feel that would be a bad move. though, I am starting to feel like they should be moved but to a more traditional us market. say, milwakee. the phx economy is just awful, so i’ve read.
Thrashers27
August 29th, 2009
12:24 pm
If Zherdev is brought in and Antro moves to C then we’ll have a heck of a bottleneck at pivot…I would be happy to see this, but from what I hear Antro isn’t too hot on the draw. Beyond that, I’d say that means that White plays second line C and Pevs goes third line LW. Unfortunately, that’s what hamstrung Pevs in Nasvhille. He was playing on the third line and not given a chance to produce. The only other option is trading White, or Peverley for picks, or prospects.
If Zherdev is brought in we could almost have three scoring lines.
Smoothie
August 29th, 2009
12:57 pm
The Zherdev rumor is bunk. Not gonna happen. Dude is a -46 for his career, PASS. A line of Kovy, Antro and Z would be exciting but one and done all the time with no cycling or extended puck possession.
The tuffest thing for Whitey will be duplicating his PP production since he may lose some mins to Antro and even Bogey / Kubes if we move Kovy off the point to mix it up.
My predictions:
Kovy — 52 G – 49 A – 101 pts
Antro — 31 G – 38 A – 69 pts
Kozzy — 23 G – 44 A – 67 pts
Pevs — 24 G – 41 A – 65 pts
Whitey — 21 G – 43 A – 64 pts
Litts — 28 G – 29 A – 57 pts
Army — 24 G – 21 A – 45 pts
Reasy — 16 G – 19 A – 35 pts
Kane / Crabb / Macho — approx 10 G and 15 assists
Slates — 12 G – 13 A – 25 pts
Thor — 7 G – 8 A – 15 pts
Boults — 6 G – 5 A – 11 pts
Team — 260 goals scored with a few from Krogger and Stewart during call-up games
Pam on Weck
August 29th, 2009
1:01 pm
More than enough centers is a good problem to have. White and Pevs were both pleasant surprises last season, so it’s difficult to want to push either to the 3rd line. But is either really THE center that can anticipate and capitalize on Kovy’s every move? Let’s face it. That’s what we really want. I will be more than satisified if Pevs turns out to be THE center and White continues on the 2nd line. Though Pevs has shown signs of greatness, it’s still a gamble.
Thrashers27
August 29th, 2009
1:12 pm
Those are pretty lofty numbers there, Smoothie.
I wonder if Krog might do better here in Atlanta with Anderson at the helm.
I’d love to see Little hit the 40 goal mark this year. I think he can do it.
I think Kane will see his nine games at the beginning of the season and then be shipped back to Vancouver. Unless there’s an injury, or trade, there’s just no room for him right now and there is no need to rush him.
kracker
August 29th, 2009
1:21 pm
Kanata…? Is that like athelitic? Sorry, I couldn’t resist.
I take the under at 65 points. Of course, I’d be quite pleased to be wrong and if the whole team plays like last spring I just might be. However, that’s just as big of an IF as is ‘how will TW play?’. White can’t rack up assists all by himself, Slava and Little have to do their part and score.
Smoothie
August 29th, 2009
1:38 pm
Yeah T27, I got just a bit carried away. I meant for those numbers to total in the neighborhood of 250 goals from our forwards. You have to think we’ll get at least 35-40 G from our blueline with the addition of Kubina. I really think this team is capable of scoring 285-290 goals for the season or an avg of nearly 3.5 per game. Last year, despite a horrible start (the 7 goal game against WSH in the opener notwithstanding) last season, the team still averaged 3.14 GPG. Add in Antropov’s 25 + goals alone and you have an additional .3 GPG. I’ll revise some of my prediction figures so the team as a whole is right around 285 (although I think the potential is higher) or 3.45 GPG:
Kovy — 52 is just fine
Antro — 27 is prolly more realistic
Kozzy — 21 makes more sense
Pevs — 24 is attainable IMHO
Whitey — 19 since his production stands to suffer the most
Little — 27 as 30+ will be hard to duplicate
3rd line — 45-50 goals is a realistic target I believe (20 from Army, 15 from Marty & 10-15 Other)
4th line — 25 goals is attainable as Gods had 19 G w/ Slater missing 20 gms
Team — 245-250 goals from the forwards
D-men Targets:
Bogey — 13 goals
Kubina — 8 goals
Enstrom — 5 goals
Hainsey — 4 goals
Oystrick — 3 goals
Salmsy — 2 goals
Other D — 2 goals
Blueline — 35-40 goals
Even if we do score 3.3-3.5 GPG, the bigger question is can we keep the GAA down around 3.00? If we can do that, then a + goal differential of 20-30 could be good enough to get in the playoffs. If you think I’m being a bit overly optimistic, perhaps I am. But I’m tired of being one of the less optimistic people on this blog. I’m trying to embrace a new positive outlook for this team and I’m just about ready to dive deep into the tank like a Democrat did for Obama!!
Brendan
August 29th, 2009
1:40 pm
I think we’ll see the same Todd White as last season, Rawhide. He fits this team.
Smoothie
August 29th, 2009
2:34 pm
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=289156
Wow, did we really fall asleep and miss this? Tanguay to the Bolts, great. A new French Connection in Tampa of all places. Let’s hope our top line of Kovy — Pevs/White — Antro can offset their goal production against us. Now we really need to sign Malhotra for that third line. C’mon Waddudley, get it done! Convince the ASG to loosen the purse strings!! We can pay MM $2 M per year and still not lose out on revenue sharing.
lee
August 29th, 2009
3:40 pm
nice blog. i luv white, he’s been an all around player and even though he isn’t always scoring he’s a great assister and is always there. the guys luv him too. whites a great guy and maybe with our new friends he can grab the puck a little more often. i think he will show some improvement in some way. lets keep our attitudes positive through out the season. LETS GO THRASHERS!!!!!!!!!!
lee
August 29th, 2009
3:41 pm
smoothie-is waddy really gettin serious about this MM situation??
Rawhide
August 29th, 2009
4:38 pm
mutton – First off, welcome…nice to see new faces around here. And nice work with those numbers…that puts White in some very good company indeed.
Kanata Supporter – So…my “story is so wrong”? Uhhh, tell me…what did I get wrong?
His 73 point production last season? Nope.
That those 73 points were a career high? No, that’s correct.
That he only had 14 goals and 23 assists the season before? No…that’s correct.
The stats from his days in Minnesota? Ottawa? Nope and nope.
That he played on the second line to begin the year with Kozlov and Little? Ummm…I think I got that one right, too.
Or is it, my friend, that you think my “story is so wrong” simply because you disagree with my opinion that Peverley should play on the top line and White would be better off between Little and Kozlov again?
As for me “sooo pushing to get White traded”…oh, I only wish I had that type of pull with Waddell and the Spirit Boys.
And finally, as to Pevs being a “bum”…take a look at his numbers after joining the Thrashers, (13 goals, 22 assist & +16 in 39 games). If you take those stats and project them over the course of an 82 game season…assuming you can do that kind of math…you will see that it equates to right at 73 points. The same total White had last year.
Oh, and the 35 points in 39 games were just 2 shy of White’s total in 2007-08 during a full season of play here.
So, given all of that, would White then be a “bum” as well?
Personally, I would hardly call either of the players a “bum”.
ex-STH
August 29th, 2009
4:48 pm
Now that Tanguay is scratched off the list, anything on bringing in a solid vet with a 1 year signing (ie. Sykora, Rob Niedermayer, (I read Lang wants nothing to do with the Thrash))?? There always seems to be that one veteren player picked up just before camp. Who will it be this pre-season? Or who will be traded off with SO MANY prospects and depth players? (Probably White and a prospect or two) White blew his wad on his career season last year. He is at maximum value right now of his entire career! The guy had a great season and is well liked but isn’t this a “business” and isn’t the objective to improve the team?!?
dandylions
August 29th, 2009
5:15 pm
Breathe, Rawhide breathe. Those of us that read daily but never post know you are “The Man”. And we know you are never wrong!
lee
August 29th, 2009
5:25 pm
rawhide, don’t listen to that guy. he’s the bum and i bet he knows nothin or very little about hockey and how great u r.
lee
August 29th, 2009
5:26 pm
rawhide-how serious is waddy getting into the manny malhotra thing?
Rawhide
August 29th, 2009
5:40 pm
dandylions – Thanks… nice to know you’re out there. But as for me being “never wrong”, I don’t know about that. I know the Divine Mrs. R would definately disagree with you.
lee – All I have heard is that Waddell made him an offer…he has decided to see if there is a better one out there for him. If that’s true, I would rather not have him here if he’s just shopping around for the money or thinks he can land on a team closer to contending.
Everyone – I have just updated the blog post to include a link to a Russian writer who recently “cyber-interviewed” me about the Thrashers. Russian, can you help a brother out with the translation?
R. Stroz
August 29th, 2009
7:10 pm
Charmin was really on a roll last season.
Curly
August 29th, 2009
8:45 pm
Rawhide – For a translation; try this link – http://translation2.paralink.com/
Brendan
August 29th, 2009
9:30 pm
Before the Todd White blog ends, (though I haven’t seen a Ranallo warning or a note from Trixie,) I want to say this about him. Jump into my time machine. We’re setting the coordinates for July 1, 2007. The Thrashers, after having made four trade deadline deals just to preserve a playoff berth, were swept out of the playoffs by the NY Rangers. A move that former beat writer Craig Custance said, “would set the Thrashers back by five years.”
Still with me? (And let’s not have some Craig Custance-bashing here. I only mentioned it.) Allright, who AGREED to sign with Atlanta after such disappointment and set back? Yes, Eric Perrin did. Who, I think, is still looking for work. But it was Todd White who, without a GUN lodged in his short-ribs, agreed to a 4-year/$9.5 million deal. Or something very similar to this.
Okay. What does it mean? It means that Todd White was WILLING to come here. And maybe, he even WANTED to come here. He knew he’d get 2nd line minutes. He knew he’d get ice time. And I’d wager that the Thrashers were the only team offering him a FOUR YEAR DEAL at that time. Part of wooing a UFA is showing him how COMMITTED you are to his services. I wasn’t opposed to Don Waddell signing Todd White. Every team needs depth players. It was Marian Hossa who privately thought, (SPECULATION ALERT!!), “You’ve got to be kidding me? I asked for caviar, and you gave me a turkey sandwich on rye.”
But really, Todd White hasn’t been some abject failure for the Thrashers. He’s fairly responsible two-way player. He’s excellent value for the money. He’s halfway home now, on his four-year deal. When Todd White arrived at training camp, Kovalchuk expressed his approval of White’s abilities. I’ve never hear Kovalchuk issue a discouraging word at Todd White. That’s probably a GOOD thing, as far as Kovy contract negotiations go.
Why mention any of this? Well, there are/seem to be people who thought Todd White would do a faceplant at Center Ice. Or think this season was an abberration. Todd White has not failed the Thrashers. He took a chance on us, when few players would. He was a UFA signing. And, now, he is a veteran presence during the building project. (Shhh, no OFFICIAL VOICE of the organization will admit to that. It’ll be our secret.) While it’s true that Todd White isn’t getting any younger, I wouldn’t label him as “over the hill” just yet. I look forward to another great season from Todd White, as a steadying force on the 2nd line.
Rawhide
August 29th, 2009
10:34 pm
Curly – Thanks…good translation site! Oh, and… welcome.
Brendan – Well stated professor.
mutton
August 29th, 2009
10:53 pm
Rawhide: Ive been a reader for a while now. Figured it was time to say hello. I always enjoy your blog; keep up the good work!
World Be Free
August 29th, 2009
11:41 pm
I’d take Peverly anytime over White. Rick Peverly made things happen last yeat when he was on the ice. White was pretty uneventful when he was out there. Yeah, he fits this team-mediocre.
Ernest Hemingway
August 30th, 2009
2:07 am
Brendan, please just get to the point and stop asking rhetorical questions that only serve to simply clutter your otherwise acceptable prose.
lee
August 30th, 2009
9:56 am
ernest hemingway-hey dude chill out, he’s making a very good point out there that u r just too lazy to read it all. hockey is very complex, didn’t know if u knew that.
brendan-hey don’t listen to him, i luv ur posts and i bet a lot of other people do too.
rawhide-how much did waddy offer MM?
GaVaHokie
August 30th, 2009
10:42 am
Let’s hope Todd picks it up this year. Frankly, I think we have seen the best of Todd White. Malholtra would have been an upgrade.
wh, wh, what?! Sorry can’t give you that one… there’s a huge difference there.
GaVaHokie
August 30th, 2009
10:54 am
Todd White is a cranial player… if healthy, I don’t see why he shouldn’t get the same numbers. The problem with him in Minnesota was the defensive minded game they play there… why do you think Gaborik wanted out? Which was problem #2… Gaborik was always hurt… White rarely had a superstar to dish the puck to.
Now he has Kovalchuk… or at worst… another cranial player in Slava Kozlov.
I still welcome Malhotra… I’m not bitter… the only reason we’re offended as Thrashers fans is because… well, we’re Thrashers fans. If you had offers from say Phoenix and Florida and then you heard Boston and Pittsburgh had interest in you, wouldn’t you take a “wait and see” approach?
GaVaHokie
August 30th, 2009
11:01 am
Smoothie… saw the Tanguay thing first thing this morning… sickening… Could be one of the best lines in Hockey.
World Be Free
August 30th, 2009
11:08 am
GaVa-yeah, I am over being made at Manny. I would welcome him too. Manny or Zherdev would really help our lineup.
Brendan
August 30th, 2009
11:15 am
Hokie, that’s a good point, and I never thought of that. It’s hard for Todd White to rack up assists when Gaborik wasn’t there. Ya know what? I’m gonna take Minnesota to be one of my adopted Western Conference teams this year. Phoenix is out. It’ll be Minn-E and L.A. this year. (It changes every year.)
Rawhide, I think this was an excellent blog topic, as evidenced by the array of opinions presented here.
Lee, thanks! In the end, none of us can please everybody. In my view of things, I commend Todd White for jumping on board the SS Thrashers. If you ask some others, Todd White’s agreeing to sign here was the equivalent of straigtening out deck chairs on the Titanic, then grabbing a violin and joining in with the band, in the chilly night air.
Buzzeng
August 30th, 2009
11:21 am
Jeepers, Rawhide – your “squeeze” line just made me spray my orange juice all over my laptop, and Stroz’ “roll” line ruined my cleanup effort. Never a dull moment on your blog! Keep up the great work! Go Thrashers!!
lee
August 30th, 2009
11:30 am
i too am not going overboard with mm. white is an excellent player that we definetly need to hold on too. mm is welcome, but he needs to know that we r keeping white. white WANTED to come here. he wanted someone to pass the puck to unlike gaborik. Malhotra kinda doesn’t want to come here, he just wants money and frankly, well white is just as good as malhotra. zherdev and manny r welcome, but their not my top priority for the thrashers.
tanguay, oh, tanguay, he’s just so good. we r really up for a great matchup!
Smoothie
August 30th, 2009
11:41 am
No doubt Hokie, the Tampons could be really tuff this year if the chemistry is there. I would think having an entire line of French-speaking players would certainly help. Perhaps we should make sure we have an entire line of Russians and pick up Zherdev for a 1 year deal afterall. Let’s hope that if in fact Tampa is much improved that Car and Fla drop off quite a bit.
Smoothie
August 30th, 2009
12:48 pm
BTW, nice going Rawhide, excellent use of alliteration!
Rawhide
August 30th, 2009
12:50 pm
rawhide-how much did waddy offer MM?
lee – I believe it was 4-years at about $2 million per.
Rawhide, I think this was an excellent blog topic, as evidenced by the array of opinions presented here.
Brendan – Thanks…just trying to stir the pot, ya know.
Jeepers, Rawhide – your “squeeze” line just made me spray my orange juice all over my laptop, and Stroz’ “roll” line ruined my cleanup effort.
Buzzeng – I hope your laptop wasn’t damaged…should I put up some sort of disclaimer citing “Not Responsible For Damage To Computer Due To Beverage Spewing Caused By Reaction To Reading This Blog Or Subsequent Comments”
BTW, nice going Rawhide, excellent use of alliteration!
Smoooooothie – Thank youuuu…I was a-hopin’ to use my words gooder for all ya’lls.
mutton – Well, it’s nice to have another “lurker” emerge from the shadows. Please chime in more often!!
World Be Free
August 30th, 2009
12:54 pm
The odd thing about malholtra is that he has just dropped off the face of the earth. Even Eklund has been quiet on Manny. Very strange.
I think Tampa will be much improved with Tanguay. I have never been a big Alex fan, but he’s have some good setup guys to paly with.
kracker
August 30th, 2009
1:18 pm
Amen to that, Earnest.
ben
August 30th, 2009
1:20 pm
just b/c manny “dropped off the face of the earth” that doesn’t mean he’s a lock for Le Thrash. Who else thinks this is Letemin’s last year in Georgia?
lee
August 30th, 2009
1:43 pm
WBF-yeah, i know it’s so weird it’s seems something suspisious is going on.
lee
August 30th, 2009
1:47 pm
ok this might sound weird but i luv video games and i am PUMPED for the NHL 10 game! it looks beast, anyone agree with me???!!!
The Earl of Bud
August 30th, 2009
2:12 pm
Bill Tiller, I have a couple of issues with some of the things you said so I’ll lay them on you and then you tell me if you think I am wrong.
1) You looked at 1 good year of White last season compared to his bad years. But in looking at his bad years your first example was his first with Atlanta. That was the year that not only was the team pitiful, but outside of superstars named Kovalchuk and Hossa, the leading scorer on the team was Perrin at 45 points in 81 games. That tells you right there that it was just a #@#%ty team that even Kozlov could only score 41 points on.
2) His next bad years you looked at were Minnesota. But as someone beat me to it, that is a defensive first team. When White had low totals with the Wild, they were 19th in the league in Goals For, but first in the league in Goals Against. They didn’t win games by having players put up big numbers, but yet they still went to the playoffs by trapping teams and holding the opponents scoring down.
3) That leaves us looking at his Ottawa years, his first 2 full seasons in the league, as a true measuring stick in addition to last year. Keep in mind too he was being shuffled around as Radek Bonk was also putting up big numbers from the center position and getting TOI there.
So now I ask you, do you expect the 2009-10 Atlanta Thrashers to be like the 07-08 Thrashers and trapping Minnesota Wild or more like the Sens of the early decade and the 08-09 Thrashers? I think they will be more like the Sens and 08-09 Thrashers. Thus, Todd White will produce but will get hurt by a loss of PP time when it comes to scoring.
Final note – if we are going to pat Anderson on the back for looking at a guy like Peverley in Milwaukee and turning him into a diamond in the rough, shouldn’t we also expect him to do the same as a coach when he says Todd White can produce? To call White “charmin” when the whole team sucked shows there is a lack of knowledge as to what was really happening on a team that fired Bob Hartley and had Hossa being shopped in addition to all the lockerroom cancers.
Rawhide
August 30th, 2009
2:39 pm
EOB – I don’t really think it’s a matter of you or anyone else offering up an opinion as being “right” or “wrong”…simply perception and observation. My impression of White in his first year here were not positive. I base that not only on his numbers, but also on the way I saw him play.
Last season, I thought he played better…his numbers certainly showed that. I also think that White benifited from Anderson’s style of play as well as having Bryan Little to one side of him. I won’t discount Kozlov either…who had a remarkable season. And to that point I thought he continued to play well once placed with Kovy late in the season.
As for your first point…yes, the Thrashers were flat out awful for the most part in 2007-08. And Todd White was a part of that team. Was he the sole “reason” it was so bad? Nope…but he was a part of it.
As for the points about Minnesota and Ottawa…it’s well taken. Those numbers we simply provided as historical references to his personal stats. Nothing more, nothing less.
As for comparing the current Thrashers with Minn. or Ottawa of the past…that wasn’t the point of my question regarding White. I simply have thrown out to the masses the question of whether or not we’ll see the Todd White of two seasons ago or last season. Personally, I think it’ll more closely resemble that of last season…but maybe not as high a point production as his 73 of last season.
The Earl of Bud
August 30th, 2009
3:50 pm
BT, I don’t think it’s “right” or “wrong” either, I think I was aiming that more at the Kanata guy than you. Your reply was kinda was I was thinking when you said “So…my “story is so wrong”? Uhhh, tell me…what did I get wrong?”
So I was just trying to say “is my opinion at all justified?” and not just say “YOU’RE WRONG TILLER AND GET OFF THE INTERNET!” and left it up to you to say do you agree with me or not. By all means, disagree with me but just tell me why and we can have a fun conversation.
I was throwing all the years up because I think there is “defensive team/crappy team” Todd White and then there is “offensive minded team/more successful team” Todd White. This coming year is going to be more like the 08-09 Thrashers as a whole, so I definitely think we will see a good Todd White. As for some of the weak play that he had two years ago, again, EVERYONE was weak and to even say “well Todd was part of that team” just doesn’t do him justice. Look at Kozlov’s play from that year. He wasn’t skating hard. Hossa wasn’t driving hard. Holik was much worse. Todd walked into a cancer waiting to spread.
I think all he needs to hit is 60 points, say 20 goals and 40 assists. He is the #2 center and it is going to be up to Little to continue to blossom, Kozlov & Antropov to add in their totals, Peverley is the one I think who needs to hit 70+ points. Oh, and I think Kovalchuk hits 100 this year the more I think about it (albeit in my biased way).
Don’t forget, Kubina, Bogosian & Entstrom can all man the point on the PP. That means that Kovalchuk may move down low. Antropov is going to get a lot of time on the 1st unit. That’s 2 forwards who are going to get cut from the PP and I think it will be White & Kozlov. Todd White had 73 points, of which 34 where from the PP. Everyone complained about Enstrom’s drop in play last year but really he just got less PP TOI and no one figured out he was playing better but just getting less PPPs. But since we gauge things on points first we fall into the trap. Todd White is going to have a similar dropoff but don’t think that it means he is going to be doing worse. I put him at 60 and if the drop comes in his PPP then that can mean he is doing just as good.
GaVaHokie
August 30th, 2009
4:05 pm
Malhotra kinda doesn’t want to come here, he just wants money and frankly
Actually, I see it as quite the opposite… he’ll get LESS money going to a contender. If he wanted the big pay day he would have signed with us immediately… I don’t think he’ll get what we’re offering him from anyone else.
I personally think he’ll be happy once he’s signed here and gets into training camp and starts meeting some of the other guys…. wouldn’t be surprised to here, “I was reluctant to sign at first, but really, I couldn’t be happier.”
EOB… I’ll remind you that Todd White’s first year was on a line with an injured Kozlov. A healthy Kozlov with a healthy White, should produce no differently this year than last year.
Prior to coming to Atlanta, he mostly played Checking Line minutes in Minnesota and Ottawa… it’s uncomparable to me.
Todd White is another case of Waddell signing an under-utilized player, that would otherwise seem like a bum, and giving him a bigger role.
Holik, Rucchin, McEachern= veteran experience
Savard, Belanger, White= under-utilized players
Which one’s have panned out the best?
Smoothie
August 30th, 2009
4:05 pm
The Thrashers were bad in White’s first season, no doubt. But keep in mind, they actually clawed their way to within a couple of pts of first before the trade deadline.
White’s soft play (hence the nickname) and tentative decision making were big reasons for the team’s struggles. He often failed to get his stick on the ice for one-timers and he was Slater-esque with his finishing at the net.
Yes, the team was very flawed (atrocious D and very little scoring from the blueline) and injuries to Kozlov, Hossa (and his reluctance to drive the net), and White really hampered the offense down the stretch.
But anyone who followed this team closely could tell that White was having a hard time adapting to his new environment. I give a lot of credit to JA’s system (and White’s willingness to buy in readily) in helping White build confidence and use his skills more effectively.
The system gave White more chances to be creative but also relied heavily on White, Pevs, Reasy and Slater to backcheck and utilize speed to thwart counter-attacks. If White slows down at all, he may struggle to be as productive this coming season.
Rawhide
August 30th, 2009
4:20 pm
EOB – Points of clarification taken…thanks. To the question of your opinion being justified…well, I think your points of contention are indeed reasonable and well stated.
Actually, you and I are probably more on the same page here than not. I think you are correct in saying that there is indeed a difference between this situations he was in while playing for the Wild and the Sens…for that matter, here as well. I also think you are correct in the perception that if he is around 60-ish points this season, that he had a good year. Which is why I set the over/under where I did.
Where I think I might differ with you, however is…if I am reading you correctly…you seem to be saying that White’s down numbers his first year here were a product of his surroundings soley. While I can understand the reasoning with that…my personal observation is that it was more due to his play .
Now…to that point…I have to admit that Todd White was the last person on the team that I thought would have a career season last year. No way on earth I saw that coming and it was a very pleasant surprise. This is why I chose to word my White writeup in the fashion I did. Not to slam him by saying “last year was a fluke”, but to get the discussion rolling… (get it…”roll”ing)…about what people might be expecting out of him this season.
Again…I hope he repeats last year’s 73 points. But, like you, I don’t expect it. However, that does not mean I’ll be disappointed with him if he produces, say, in the low-to-mid 60s…given his overall career history and the role he plays on this team.
Curly
August 30th, 2009
4:45 pm
Rawhide – Thanks for the welcome. I’m a frequent reader (lurker)… rarely post.
To answer your question. I’ll take the “Over” on Todd White. I see no reason he should not equal his performance and point total from last year; pending injury of course.
Ernest Hemingway – I’ll take Brendan’s posts as they are. I enjoy reading his posts. They’re ……. GREAT!
World Be Free
August 30th, 2009
5:50 pm
Thanks for your thoughts on Malholtra-I simply just wonder where he is and why his name has not surfaced anywhere?!
Bill, do you have ANYTHING on Malholtra, whether it has to do with Atlanta or not? Even Comrie is the source of rumors there days, Malholtra is a better player all around than Comrie.
It just does not make any sense.
Lee
August 30th, 2009
6:01 pm
Hokie, I wasn’t tryin to say that he wasn’t gonna come him because of the big offer just that he’s being smart and wait for another offer. How can u not say he doesn’t want money? Of course he does just lik any other hockey player. Sure, he wants a good team that will win but if u turn down an offer that big, don’t u think he is going for money?
Anywayz that’s just my opinion. Hokie, I’m not tryin to say ur wrong.
Hey, anyone excited for NHL 10? Heck I am and it may seem weird but I can’t wait!
Rawhide
August 30th, 2009
6:15 pm
Bill, do you have ANYTHING on Malholtra, whether it has to do with Atlanta or not?
WBF – Uh….hmmmm…no. I got nuthin’ on Malholtra. That story seems to have vanished quicker than my cousin’ Cleatus when the dinner check arrives.
ben
August 30th, 2009
6:54 pm
does anyone have any heatley news? has he actually been traded?
World Be Free
August 30th, 2009
7:08 pm
BT-Thanks
With so many news outlets there, you’d think somebody had some news on the guy.
lee
August 30th, 2009
7:13 pm
tiller, haha i don’t think manny is really into the thrashers, hey, hes welcome but he really isn’t buyin much. cleatus a hockey fan or a more of a dinner check guy?
ben, no nuthin, but he hasn’t been traded because of his sloppy attitude and playing, no one really wants him and i don’t blame them. heatley is a star player, but he’s not the star player with a good attitude, he’s no crosby or kovy he just frankly nothing to go crazy bout. all lot of controversy has gone on with the snyder incident and the suckish playing hes been doing. and really no one really has the money to be pay for his expensive ticket when he doesn’t play that desent. he’s kinda like a brett farve. so with that said, theres really no news and don’t expect any fora while becuase he’s just sittin in no man’s land.
lee
August 30th, 2009
7:15 pm
WBF-hav u tried those other bloggers that sara listed earlier? they probably hav some.
ben
August 30th, 2009
7:30 pm
lee, i agree, but i thought there’d be some taker.
lee
August 30th, 2009
7:44 pm
ben, oh im sure there r takers, it’s just that he is not gonna get payed as much and the team isn’t gonna make a big deal bout it.
lee
August 30th, 2009
7:49 pm
ben, also if there r takers, they r not going to try to find a 5 or 6 million deal. the ppl that may be considering heatley rn’t that serious like the ppl that want mats sundin. at the max im thinking heatly MIGHT get a 3 or 4 million if that! he’s really not worth much anymore.
Thrashers27
August 30th, 2009
7:52 pm
I can tell it’s a rainy afternoon in Thrasherville…everybody is home blogging…and judging by some of the sentence structures, clearly drinking. Thanks for keeping me entertained while I’m at work Thrashers fans!
I’m dying for some hockey. Can’t wait for that small fix next week.
lee
August 30th, 2009
7:54 pm
DROP THE PUCK ALREADY!!!!!!!! ARAGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
lee
August 30th, 2009
7:56 pm
thrashers27-haha,yeah, whats better than blogging and havin a drink on a rainy day? so am i, even the preseason games keep me on the edge of my seat.
The Earl of Bud
August 30th, 2009
8:43 pm
GaVaHokie, thanks for that bit on Kozlov’s shoulder, I forgot about that. Another year of a healthy Kozlov should be good for Todd White.
BT, yeah I think we are closer as well. I am actually going to change my number. Last year Todd White got 38 ES points and 34 PP points (and 1 SHG) for 73 points. As I wrote earlier, his PP TOI is going to drop significantly with Antropov coming and more defensemen playing the point, thus possibly moving Kovalchuk down low. So let’s say he gets 14 PPP instead of 34, that means he will be the exact same player talent wise but get 53 points instead of 73. I really think that is going to happen.
With that said, I don’t want people moaning when Todd White’s total goes down because of this. The same thing happened when in 07-08 Enstrom had 26 PP points with 5:44 of PP TOI/G. Last year he only got 14 PP points with only 3:18 PP TOI/G and that 3:18 average was much lower in the beginning of the year. Everyone complained about a sophomore slump because he wasn’t producing like his rookie year but nothing could be further from the truth. He took the role of a top pair defenseman with Bogosian heading into this season although on paper his stats were lower.
So yeah, we are going to see a much lower Todd White output this year but it will only be due to a loss in PP TOI. I imagine he will make up that TOI playing shorthanded more often. And you certainly won’t get that many points playing on the PK.
Alex
August 30th, 2009
8:49 pm
Good interview Rawhide..In the title it says “Questions answered by The Atlanta-Journal Constitution Columnist- Bill Tiller” I also agree- Anderson-coach of the year and Kovalchuk-MVP if Thrashers make playoffs this year.
Lee- What is so exciting about NHL 10? It’s basically the same as NHL09, only fighting and boards play are new…BTW what platform U play it on?
Dwayne
August 30th, 2009
8:53 pm
Over on that 65 Bill, mark it down. Kovy will have a huge year with White and Antro. Here is my logic on this, Kovy is on a contract year, he will have the big “C” on his chest for all year, he asked for help, I believe he has it now. Russian talked about pride from Russian players, lets see it from start to finish. Pevs centering Little and Kozzy will be fine. To me, all 4 lines are what they need to be, its all about the “D” and Stendecs favorite goalie….Kari.
lee
August 30th, 2009
8:57 pm
alex,haha thats the respond i always get. well i think it has pretty good graphics, but really im not that big of a gamer, certainly not like a teenager, but i do hav a 360 with my son.
ah, well im a lot more excited bout real hockey than nhl 10.
Rawhide
August 30th, 2009
9:24 pm
Alex - Thanks.
Lee – Cousin Cletus is…uh…he’s kinda…well, er ah…ummm…Cletus is sort of…oh, just look here for yourself.
GaVaHokie
August 30th, 2009
10:08 pm
EOB… Peverley had some slumps in Nashville. Granted he was buried in the roster, but the reason he was put on waivers by Nashville was so he could get his confidence back in the minors… so I would think he’s prone to some slumps.
Smoothie
August 30th, 2009
10:08 pm
If Todd White can dish out more than 50 assists again, then perhaps the Thrashers actually win more than 40 gms
Viking
August 30th, 2009
11:37 pm
Thrashers27, I think the rainy day and beer has affected more than the sentence structure and frequency of comments.
Acronyms in abundance and caps only used when SCREAMING. Is this what we are looking forward to when texting been around for some more years? U, r and gms for you, are and games are making some of you guy’s comments tougher to follow for the unitintiated.
Sadtoseeitthisway
August 31st, 2009
1:19 am
I think we`ve seen the best of Todd White this past season. We can title it My Career Year”. Todd was eager to sign when he did. Why? Because we gave him by far the best offer he received at that time.
Hijacker
August 31st, 2009
6:33 am
White’s career peaks were 50, 60 and 73 points. You have a five year window between his highest totals. You probably guessed it. I don’t think that White will repeat last season or build upon it. One should expect a normal Todd White season in 2009-10 which translates to 40 to 50 points (sans injuries.)
I expect Peverely to come back to earth as well. Maybe he’ll score around 45 points.
carolina fan
August 31st, 2009
8:13 am
I saw some posts of the Tanguay signing with Tampa Bay. It isn’t so much Alex lining up with Vinny down there (which is bad enough) but now St Louis can play with Stamkos again. They were an incredible pair over the last half of the season. Not sure which line Malone will play on but the Lightning will have two superb lines going. If they don’t have to use 20+ defensemen again this year (not likely) they will be tough to match up against.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
8:22 am
Todd was eager to sign when he did. Why? Because we gave him by far the best offer he received at that time.
What were the other offers?
Nikita
August 31st, 2009
9:07 am
I don’t understand why normal Todd White is a bad thing, though. Todd White is our best all-around player since…um…that guy I hate. He is not an elite player like that guy I hate, but he is a very good player, and on a team that didn’t play like ours did last year, he’d be one in a set of core players around which you’d build your success.
He brings all the prized attributes, such as work ethic and two-way responsibility, and is an asset to the team in terms of how he affects morale and the example he sets. If he only brings in 50 points next year, then that’s still a bargain for what we paid him, and it also doesn’t reflect his contributions on special teams.
…I don’t think he’ll repeat. Not because I don’t think he’s capable, but because I expect the rest of the team to improve enough to compensate. But a normal level of production would still be a great asset to the team.
Midfield
August 31st, 2009
9:39 am
Nikita, Todd is not universally accepted because ASG and Waddell lauded his acquisition as the first line center acquisition for a contender level play, and he obviously is not. So, he is taking the brunt for the lying liars ASG and DW. Excuse me for writing it out like that. Also, when the rest of the team improves, normally individual production over the course of the season goes up, not down, because just a handful of guys do not have to carry the water all by themselves – the minutes are spread optimally, the legs are fresher, more PP time rather than PK time, etc, etc.
World Be Free
August 31st, 2009
9:46 am
Don’t know if you have all noticed, but Paul Kelley and Pat Flatley are no longer with the players’ union. This type of instability does not bode well for the next player/owner bargaining.
Is anotgher lockout in our future?
BT-suggest you take a look at this one. This would be a blog subject that would bring out some interesting fan reactions!
Heck with the cap going lower-no need for a cap if there is no season.
Rawhide
August 31st, 2009
9:52 am
Todd is not universally accepted because ASG and Waddell lauded his acquisition as the first line center acquisition for a contender level play, and he obviously is not. So, he is taking the brunt for the lying liars ASG and DW
Midfield – Great point. This is one of the reasons I feel that many fans were so upset with his play in 2007-08. There was a lot of “THIS is what they consider a top-line center”? and “How much are we paying for this guy” going on at Philips Arena.
Last season he plays the majority of the year on the second line and plays very, very well and gains some deserved credit.
It’s an expectations game, I guess.
WBF – Thanks for the tip-off. I had not seen that…very interesting indeed.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
10:09 am
It’s a Catch 22… Waddell doesn’t believe Kovalchuk needs an Elite Center because he creates his own chances… however, SOMEONE has to play Top Line Center. That’s not White’s fault… but kudos to Todd White for stepping up and producing more points than Vinny Lecavalier, Patrick Marleau, Jonathan Toews and Anzi Kopitar… to name a few.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
10:25 am
GVH, everyone wants Kovalchuk to have that elite center. But I read it a few places last year where people would say if Kovalchuk is scoring 40-50 goals a year (#2 and #4 in the league the last two years) it’s not like if you get him an elite center all of a sudden he is going to score 95 goals/year. So it isn’t as much a catch-22 other than you have to ask, how many more goals is Kovalchuk really going to score if he gets that elite center? Maybe 10 more max?
Another question when talking about this is if anyone can name who the elite centers are that guys like Rick Nash, Jarome Iginla, Shane Doan, Zach Parise, Thomas Vanek, etc. have played with.
Brendan
August 31st, 2009
10:44 am
Part of assessing Todd White, this upcoming season, will depend on his role and minutes played. With the “no brainer” understanding that the more minutes White plays, the greater opportunity he has to get closer to his career-best 73-points. If Todd White were to be used in the same manner as the previous season, I’m thinking he’ll get 65-points or more. If he isn’t, then he won’t. And his numbers will also depend on good health.
If, say, Evander Kane makes the team and plays 3rd line minutes, his point production probably won’t place him in “Calder Trophy candidacy.” Which then will make pundits across the league, who pay no attention to this team, (Dave Reid, of OTF, I’m looking at you,) say that Kane had a “disappointing” year. Thud. Shaking my head. Moving on.
With respect to White and Kane, and well ALL the other Thrasher players, we must trust the judgement of John Anderson to decide what is BEST for the team he coaches. It seems crazy to remove capable players from situations where they’d likely succeed. But “stupid is … as stupid does,” right Forest? We’ll just have to see how it all plays out. If Kane earns a roster spot, and White falters, then I expect to see Kane playing those 2nd line minutes.
Sadtoseeitthisway, Todd White could have pulled a Manny M. on the Wadster. Meaning? He could have waited a while longer, shopping around for what other offers came his way. Instead, he took the deal right away. Stop for a minute, okay? Imagine you’re a UFA. You didn’t re-sign with your last club. Or they didn’t offer to renew you. You’re in your late 20’s, and are arguably a Tier II guy, who can bounce between the 2nd and 3rd lines, but you BELIEEEEVE that you could do something significant, if you could find a team willing to give you 2nd line minutes. So, there you are. You’re nervous and anxious about what Free Agency will bring. You’re excited and hopeful that someone out there REALLY wants you, and will give you the break/opportunity you seek. You also know that you might be sitting there, un-signed, after the July 4th holiday, pushed further and further away from those 2nd lines minutes you sought, as budgets get filled and purse strings tighten up, league-wide. You also hope for some job security, with a 3-year deal.
Still with me? The Frenzy begins at 12 Noon. Before you can say, “Rumpelstiltskin,” Don Waddell has jumped all over you with a FOUR (4) year deal, giving you precisely the opportunity you sought, even with the prospect of playing with Hossa or Kovalchuk. For White, he’d seen enough, apparently. He inked it. He could have shopped around for 3 year deals that would have paid him nearly $9 million. The Salary Cap was exploding. The payscale was getting ridiculous. It went from $39 to $44, to $50.3, I think, by 2007. And it’s still growing, however marginally. The point is … Todd White could have waited. He could seen if a contending team would take him as a 3rd line center. He wanted to play 2nd line minutes and have decent linemates. He chose Atlanta to pursue those options. Nobody put a gun to his head. He chose us. In my view, that makes him a “good guy.” He would have received other offers. He signed by something like 1PM, on July 1, 2007.
R. Stroz
August 31st, 2009
10:49 am
capgeek.com has Tanguay signed with Tampa for one year at 2.5 million.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
10:50 am
EOB… exactly… and I would include Ovechkin in that list as well.
Of course, someone will fire back that none of those teams are winning Stanley Cups lately either.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
10:51 am
capgeek.com has Tanguay signed with Tampa for one year at 2.5 million.
This tells me there’s gotta be something to that injury issue.
… hopefully.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
10:58 am
So it isn’t as much a catch-22 other than you have to ask, how many more goals is Kovalchuk really going to score if he gets that elite center?
Who can I sign that can give me top line minutes, not screw up, won’t cost me a truck load of money, and can get the puck to my All Star winger?
Sara
August 31st, 2009
11:13 am
WBF – it seems the players are bracing themselves for a big fight. The two biggest fights are likely going to be over the length of contracts (think controversy over Hossa, Zetterberg, Pronger contracts) as well as player participation in the Olympics beyond 2010. The players also want some input into relocation and expansion decisions and apparently a larger percentage of revenue.
On the first two issues, I’d side with the players. I don’t mind the long contracts – teams should absolutely have the right to lock-up players they consider franchise guys as long as they want. Players have a right to the security of a long contract. And long-term contracts in particular for guys like Zetterberg and Ovechkin are going to make the fans happy (who here wouldn’t breathe a HUGE sigh of relief if Kovy signed a 10-year deal?) The negative implications of long-term contracts are well known to GMs and if they want to take that gamble (think NYI goalie for life), that’s their decision. I’m getting a little sick of the League constantly trying to save GMs and owners from themselves, when clearly many of them do not wish to be saved. And if GMs like Holland or Holmgren are savvy enough to creatively structure these contracts (the League’s big beef), then good for them. It frankly makes sense to front-load long contracts. When you break-down the annual salaries, odds are good that each year represents market value for a given player at a certain age and point in career. And if they are potentially undervalued, well, that’s the player’s choice. If someone wants to take less money, so be it. Why would the League oppose that? Plus all 30 teams can make those types of contracts if they choose, so it’s not like it’s an unfair advantage.
I’m also all for player participation in the Olympics. That’s a major source of pride for many of these guys and my impression is that’s whole-heartedly supported by the players. That’s not a fight I think the NHL should be picking.
As for the other issues – screw the players. They make more than enough money and I have zero sympathy for any arguments for more $$. I also think they have no place in determining the placement of franchises – while Bettman and the League do not always make all the best decisions, they likely have a much better team to look at the financial viability of franchises than the players are going to. If left to the players, how many would have voted for an Atlanta or Carolina franchise? Maybe not even a Dallas franchise. And Canada cannot support an unlimited amount of NHL franchises no matter what the fans or media up there think.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
11:13 am
Yeah, I was going to include Ovy, but Ovechkin at least has Backstrom who puts up some points. But then you gotta ask how well would that kid have developed if he was dishing to Miro Satan instead of Alex Ovechkin.
Perhaps Waddell did this analysis and figured the money would be better spent on Campbell for the blueline. That didn’t work, so he saved the money and got the next best option in Hainsey.
kracker
August 31st, 2009
11:53 am
GAVA – “Who can I sign that can give me top line minutes, not screw up, won’t cost me a truck load of money, and can get the puck to my All Star winger?”
I’m sure hoping that’s Peverley.
Smoothie
August 31st, 2009
12:11 pm
EOB – wasn’t White signed the summer before Hainsey?
Smoothie
August 31st, 2009
12:14 pm
Miiiissss-TERRRRRRR PEVERLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY! Said in a booming Mr. Kennedy (of WWE fame) voice over the loud-speaker at Philips Arena.
That would be a sweet way for Shaffee to announce Rich as he skates onto the ice as the # 1 Center on 10/3.
Toby
August 31st, 2009
12:31 pm
Peverlyyy….
Brendan
August 31st, 2009
12:53 pm
The front loaded contracts hurt smaller markets, that can’t afford them. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that Phoenix wanted to offer Hossa the very same deal that Chicago did. Is Phoenix an unceasing flow of revenue stream, to be able to afford that? No, they’d feel the pinch of that front loaded contract. Badly. At least there’d be the lesser cap hit, that includes years for which Hossa very well may be retired. Which is worth investigating. But where is Phoenix supposed to get the money to front load that contract?
I like NHL players in the Olympics. The league won’t. They have to shut down for two weeks. It’s very disruptive to schedule and flow of the season, and the venues. But hey! It’s also a time for injured players to rest and recuperate. It helped Kari Lehtonen in 2006!
I would think, that from the league’s perspective, the goal ought to be 30 healthy franchises. Part of that … is giving those dozen or so clubs who can’t afford the floor of cap without revenue-sharing dollars … a healthy chance to compete for Top Tier talent out on the open market.
I won’t deny it for a second. I want the salary cap to come DOWN. I want back in the 40’s, so the Atlanta market can compete. And ideally, I’d like it to stay there. If a cap can grown from $39.0 million to $56.8 million in five years, what will it be five years from now? It could be over $70 million.
For people saying, so??? Guess who’s gonna pay for those increased dollars? Fans! Gate receipts. That’s where 76% of the revenue is generated. What if the cap gets to $70 million, by 2015? That means the FLOOR is $54 million. Said another way, “right about where the ceiling is now.” Can Atlanta even field a roster that APPROACHES $54 million???!!
Allllllriiiighteeeeee then. If there has to be a lockout to bring the price down, that’s disappointing. I don’t want to see that. In fact, all I think is really needed to remedy the situation … is to ACTUALLY DO what the lockout SAID it would. Namely, “to tie the cap to revenues.” In lean years, it goes down. It fat years, it goes up. But the “cooked books” of the NHL accountants allow them to fix the cap based on PROJECTED REVENUES instead of ACTUAL ones. Just do what is ACTUALLY IS, and everything will be just fine.
(Except that approach makes it difficult for the Red Wings to field the All-Star teams. Not to pick on them. It would make it difficult for any well-established, traditional NHL, big market city.)
Now, normally, I subscribe to the theory of “The gov’t that governs LEAST, governs BEST,” but in this case, I do think some rules should be in effect. How did the NHL get in TROUBLE, if not for GM’s and owners who let the marketplace spin wildly out of control? With limits, specifically spending limits, some markets would have payrolls up around $80 million. I’d say 10-years is a nice term-limit on duration for an RFA contract, with 8-years being the maximum limit for any UFA player under 32. In other words, say some Tier I guy is 34, I’d want the kaibosh put on some 10-year deal, that would pay him until he’s 44. That’s just cheating against smaller markets, like Phoenix, that can’t afford to front load a 10-year deal to acquire that player, even with the benefit of the lessened cap hit, artifically deflated by years during which the player will be retired. Everything about that deal reeks. Let’s say is 10-years/$50 million, but $40 million of it has to be paid in the first four (4) years of the contract. The last six years pay the player the remaining $10 million. While some people would jump up and down, “Hey, Phoenix can afford $5 million cap for a $10 million-a-year player!!” Yes, but the player stands there with his palm out, tapping his foot, for money you don’t really have. It’s crap. That player gets paid something like $1.66 million for play when he’s 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44 years of age. Well, that just makes him easier to trade, right? To whom??? The player has one foot in the grave and the other on the golf course. Who wants to pick up the contract of a 39-year old, with six years left on it? Put those hands down. For the love of Pete. It’s a problem of “fairness” in a league that wants 30 healthy franchises. Well, if it wants 30 healthy franchises, it’s got to stop the rich from hoarding all the talent. The Rich stay healthy and the sick stay poor, is how, I think, that expression goes. If ya want the sick to get healthy, you got to give them some equal footing in the marketplace. A cap based on ACTUAL revenues and term-limits could help the bottom feeder teams. Like the Thrashers, for instance.
World Be Free
August 31st, 2009
12:57 pm
Sara-I agree with your points about the players, Olympics and length of contracts. The length of contract thing was initiated by management, not the players. I think both issues are small in relation to the most important labor issues-revenue sharing and the percentages receives each side receives. I would favor a soft cap, to allow teams to keep their star players in exchange for some type of commitment. Such a cap would reduce the number of players moving around. But then again, it might not.
The decision to moves teams should always be with the owners. Cities make investments to develop arenas and surrounding services to support teams. What qualifications do the players have to determine where a team should or should not be? If the players want a larger portion of the business side, then they need to put up some money. It’s like going to Vegas with someone else’s wallet.
Nikita
August 31st, 2009
1:00 pm
**Also, when the rest of the team improves, normally individual production over the course of the season goes up, not down, because just a handful of guys do not have to carry the water all by themselves – the minutes are spread optimally, the legs are fresher, more PP time rather than PK time, etc, etc.**
Sort of, but not necessarily. On a team that performs better, Todd White should see slightly fewer minutes, and maybe less PK minutes. But for example, if the team gets better and we add more guys who can contribute on the PP, meaning that Todd White sees more time on the PK and less on the PP, his points could go down substantially. Which is a real possibility, since we seem to have improved WRT the PP, but stayed the same or gotten worse re: the PK. I don’t see his minutes changing a lot, incidentally — he plays a slightly more than average number of minutes, but Anderson seems to determined to keep him healthy and relatively fresh.
re: Kovy and opportunities, he’s improving, but he still needs care and feeding, and his feeders need to be as defensively responsible as possible to compensate for his relatively lack of skill in that area. Which Todd White is. Also, Kovy likes Todd White and has made that clear numerous times — that should count for something. I don’t care which line he plays on, but it bears noting that the #1 Line guy is happy to have him on his.
Nikita
August 31st, 2009
1:00 pm
P.S. I should have said I don’t care which line as long as it’s #1 or #2. I don’t think Todd White can take the pounding he’d get on the checking or energy lines.
Bill Tiller (Rawhide)
August 31st, 2009
1:02 pm
100th!!! HA!!
Sorry…couldn’t resist.
Hijacker
August 31st, 2009
1:03 pm
@ Midfield:
That’s a really good point and certainly plays into my evaluation*. Just don’t forget that White was “hot” last season plus teams didn’t pay attention to him, since he coming off a weak season in 07-08 (together with Kozlov and also ex-rookie Little.) I expect coaches to use their better defenseman and checkers against White’s line, which will effect his scoring (IMO, in a negative way.)
World Be Free
August 31st, 2009
1:18 pm
Looks like the players did not like this guy–
Paul Kelly is out as executive director of the NHL Players’ Association. The union announced Monday at its annual meeting that its executive board had voted to remove Kelly. The executive board is made up of one player from each of the 30 teams. The union said it would immediately assemble a committee to find a replacement.
kracker
August 31st, 2009
1:18 pm
Hijacker – “I expect coaches to use their better defenseman and checkers against White’s line…”
That’s fine with me. I very much want the team to get to the “They may stop some of us but they can’t stop all of us” level. I want to see the other guys exhausted, clutching/grabbing and going to the penalty box.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
1:35 pm
Smoothie, yes that is true. But in the grand scheme of things, White was the replacement to Belanger when we didn’t re-sign him. If you want to get down to nitty gritty budget details, I think first there was a pot of money set aside for Hossa and his first year re-signed would’ve been the 08-09 season. Since he was traded away the previous year (07-08 season), we had an extra $7 mil that we could have used for 1) an elite center or 2) a puck moving defenseman. Waddell decided to stay with White as the top line center and then make a run towards Campbell which lead to Hainsey. That’s what I meant by how things went down in that analysis/decision.
“teams didn’t pay attention to him, since he coming off a weak season in 07-08 “
hijacker, in some ways I can agree with you in the beginning of the season, but once you get a few months into the season you gotta think everyone is looking at the standings and everyone is watching the scoring races. If Lecavalier breaks out with Tanguay on his line or Stamkos and St. Louis start piling up points, do you honestly think we aren’t going to play hard against them in January 2010 because they had a bad season in 08-09?
Sort of along the lines of what kracker says, I would love for other teams to put their top pair defensemen against Koz/Wht/Ltl and then watch what happens with Kov/Pev/Ant against the weaker defensemen.
Sara
August 31st, 2009
1:39 pm
Brendan I don’t necessarily agree that the long-term contracts hurt smaller market teams. The front-loaded portion of most of these contracts is still in line with what these guys would get on the market with a shorter term contract. Hossa makes $7.9M in the early years of the contract, Pronger $7.6M, Zetterberg $7.75 after this season. None of those numbers are artificially high for any of those players. Even smaller market teams like Phx should have to expect to pay those salaries for those players. Now, if Phx can’t afford to pay those salaries, that’s an entirely different issue, but one that is not made better/worse by long-term contracts.
The League, IMO, has done about as much as could reasonably be done to bring some parity to the League. There comes a point where the onus is on the teams/owners. If they can’t afford to pay contracts, maybe they don’t need to be here. Even though we’ve had some $$ issues in Atlanta, we’ve been able to pay Kovy a significant salary, we were able to compete for Campbell with a high-dollar contract offer. A pitch was made to Hossa and I’ll bet it was significant as well. You have to pick and choose your battles more carefully when you don’t have the financial resources of a Detroit or Philly, but there is nothing the League can do to change that fact any more than the hard cap does – short of bottoming out that cap again and keeping it suppressed (which the players will NEVER go for).
Midfield
August 31st, 2009
1:39 pm
That’s a good point, kracker. “Deep bench” teams make any coach look better, because the coach can creat favorable matchups much easier.
Hijacker
August 31st, 2009
1:54 pm
I played plenty of football (not American) in my life and I have to say that you sometimes underestimate your opponents, because they don’t have a recognizable name. People will always try to watch out for the stars/ best players.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
1:59 pm
That’s fine with me. I very much want the team to get to the “They may stop some of us but they can’t stop all of us” level. I want to see the other guys exhausted, clutching/grabbing and going to the penalty box.
Yeah, no kidding… would love to see teams playing their best defensive lines against White, Kozlov and Little… that means Kovy, Pevs and Antro are roaming free.
That’s why I’m not against throwing Kane out with Reasoner and Army… more scoring threats than the opposition knows what to do with. I mean, isn’t that what made Detroit and Pittsburgh so successful? Go down to the 3rd and 4th lines and you still got Hudler, Filppula, Samuelsson, Helm, Talbot and Kennedy.
kracker
August 31st, 2009
2:17 pm
Yes, Midfield, I’m hoping, maybe even expecting, the players will hit the ground…err, the ice skating in Anderson’s system from game one, relentlessly attacking. I don’t think it’s too big of a stretch to envision the Thrashers having 4 lines that do their jobs quite well. Third line LW is still not set but I am trusting that mgmt. will find a suitable player to fill the position.
I’m not expecting Kane to quite be ready but perhaps he will surprise us. Many didn’t expect Bogosian to be ready and one could say that he wasn’t really ready, not until he came back from the extended injury. Looking at a similar time frame for Kane, I don’t think the team can afford a half year learning curve for him to get up to speed and still expect to beat out several teams for the 7 or 8 spot.
kracker
August 31st, 2009
2:26 pm
Good point about having Kane pump up the 3rd line scoring, GAVA. If he can do it. If he is ready to rock, he should really stand out in the Traverse City tournament.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
2:33 pm
“and I have to say that you sometimes underestimate your opponents, because they don’t have a recognizable name.”
hijacker, I have to disagree again. Just because you don’t recognize the names doesn’t mean that others can’t. Scroll around these blogs. On one of them World Be Free is talking about the masks that Rogier Crozier played with, that was after people were arguing over Stu Grimson being a good fighter or not, add in another talk of Tony C who once told me the skill level of a guy who only played in the KHL whose name I couldn’t even spell let alone pronounce, there are fans that know these players. I’m not even going to quote Brendan or GaVaHokie here. Now if fans know them this well, how well do the players know them? How many players played with Todd White between the Wild, Senators, Flyers, not to mention the Phantoms, Cleveland and his junior teams? I’m sorry but if we can name the main players from the Hurricanes or the Sabres, then so can the players.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
2:39 pm
GaVaHokie & Kracker, agree on the scoring if Kane can get up to speed fast enough. Don’t ask me where I read it, but I seem to remember Anderson also hinting that Kane might play on the PK. That would give us Reasoner/Armstrong as the first unit and possibly White/Kane on the second unit. I wouldn’t mind that at all – if Kane is able.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
2:57 pm
If he can do it. If he is ready to rock, he should really stand out in the Traverse City tournament.
Also a good point… looking back at the Heatley and Kovalchuk debut in Traverse City…
“The two future stars clicked so well in Traverse City that they helped lead Atlanta to a bronze-medal win at the 2001 Rookie Evaluation Tournament from Sept. 5-9. Heatley notched 10 points off six goals and four assists in four games and Kovalchuk netted three points off one goal and two assists.“
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
3:07 pm
Here’s a big surprise as to what nhl.com says is the biggest question to the Thrashers’ upcoming season – http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=469852
Also, while many here have said that it’s the Buffalo Sabres who would try to block an NHL club’s relocation to Hamilton, it actually may be the Toronto Maple Leafs – http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/story.html?id=1945327
Finally, a Kalamazoo update for Brendan – http://www.wane.com/dpp/sports/local_sports/local_wane_ft_wayne_county_sues_hockey_team_20090828_rev1
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
3:29 pm
Some more Thrashers reading… nothing really new, but here are “Five Things to know about the Thrashers”.
http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/story/12137609/rss
kracker
August 31st, 2009
3:53 pm
Kari remains…well, Kari. Can he stay healthy. Plus, this season we have the added questions of how effective was his corrective surgery and how long will he take to fully recover from it?
Being that conventional wisdom says you build your defense from the goalie outward, I have to agree that Lehtonen is the team’s biggest question mark. Last season we had, in addition to the same question in goal, new coaches bringing their new coaching systems and philosphies, lots more new skaters to try to fit on the team and every player had to learn and buy into JA’s systems. Some never did believe in the system.
This year, the team is more set, the coach is more established and I expect the two or three newcomers to get with the program asap.
Hence, Lehts remains the great unknown. Him and the
other perennial question about the Thrashers: the defense. But see above: you build the D first at the G.
kracker
August 31st, 2009
3:57 pm
Oh, I didn’t think about the Kovalchuk question. That’s the biggest one of all but it is not a question about how the team will perform this season, unless it becomes a big distractiion to the team.
mid-ga-hockey fan
August 31st, 2009
4:18 pm
I have been reading this blog for quite some time and I am of the opinion that most of you are quite knowlegable hockey fans and that some of you have probably actually played.I get the impression though that some of you believe that White should be “awarded” the 1st line center because of his PAST works,forgive me if I sound naive but isn’t camp performance this year paramount to putting together line combos,as they are usually fluid throughout the year.IMO a pick-up of Zherdev would do nothing but help this team,I have seen clips of his play w/NYR,I personally think he is much better talentwise than MM.I always thought that putting the best talent on the ice was the “Prime Directive”and if moving Mr. White down to the 3rd line is not worthy of his salary,Hey,give some back!!
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
4:36 pm
kracker, you touch on one of the advantages that goes completely unmentioned that we never had before – roster turnover (or lack thereof). There is almost a complete lack of roster turnover from last year to this year and that is not only amazing as a Thrashers fan but a good thing for any hockey team. We have 10 out of 12 forwards coming back and 5 out of 6 defensemen coming back. And both goalies.
I don’t think we ever had such a stable transition from one season’s roster to the next season. Remember how Anderson was saying it would take until at least December or January to fully grasp the system? And the slow start was a result. This year they should have it in training camp.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
4:36 pm
IMO a pick-up of Zherdev would do nothing but help this team,I have seen clips of his play w/NYR,I personally think he is much better talentwise than MM.
True… but he’s also twice the price.
Having Manny Malhotra would be like adding another Colby Armstrong to the Checking Line.
Actually, I just finished up going through Manny’s goal catalog on NHL.com… check this one out.
http://www.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?hlp=8467334&fr=false
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
4:37 pm
How’s this for a noise for the net?…
http://www.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?hlp=8467334&fr=false
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
4:40 pm
Argh… sorry, hate partial URLS…
Here’s the first goal by Manny I wanted to show.
http://www.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?hlp=8467334&event=CBJ376
Here’s the second… nose for the net…
http://www.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?hlp=8467334&event=CBJ566
goose
August 31st, 2009
4:46 pm
so now apparently not even the senators want heatley got any ideas on where he might play or be forced to play because nobody else wants him
Nikita
August 31st, 2009
4:51 pm
*I always thought that putting the best talent on the ice was the “Prime Directive”and if moving Mr. White down to the 3rd line is not worthy of his salary,Hey,give some back!!*
1. White’s salary is pretty low for his production, even in an off year.
2. Yes, you want to put the best talent, or the best talent combos, on ice. But White is most likely the best talent combo with Little and Koz. He’s a serviceable combo with Kovalchuk. So…no 3rd line, especially since as I noted he probably can’t take the pounding. He plays well as long as we keep in mind that he isn’t as young and big and durable as our grinders.
GaVaHokie
August 31st, 2009
4:52 pm
goose… plenty of teams want Heatley, it’s just the asking price is pretty high. I’ll say he ends up with the Rangers. He’d probably already BE a Ranger if Sather was willing to give up Dubinsky in the package.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
4:58 pm
mid-ga-hockey fan, right off the bat, Peverley is going to get “awarded” the 1st line center because of his past works. But if you look at how he played with Kovalchuk last season (35 points in 39 games) there is no argument that beats that. To say Zherdev is better is then arguing on Zherdev’s past works. White then is going to be the 2nd line center.
To compare White, Zherdev and Malhotra is not quite legit because they are all playing 3 different positions. 3rd line center is a checking, defensive position where you must take out the other teams top line whereas 1st line center must be a point/game type offensive guy. If a team is a defense first team with a strong goalie then the 1st line center can be a Peca who doesn’t score as often, but that is not our team.
Since we already solidified our top 2 lines, you have to ask is Zherdev going to play 3rd line checking role? No. So if he is better than someone on the top 2 lines, does the person he replaces fill that 3rd line checking role? Maybe Antropov could, but that would be pointless since we also just brought him in to play with Kovalchuk. White is good defensively, but he does it when he is being a responsible 2-way player, not as a primary position. Hossa was a good 2-way player, but you would never make him be primarily in a checking role. Federov was a dynamic 2-way player.
As for 3rd liners, Reasoner is perfect for this role. Bobby Holik was actually perfect for this role. People didn’t like Holik because they thought he was supposed to score more but in reality that was not his job at all. He just had to go shut down the other team’s top line and he did that. If we do put Kane there it is to add some scoring to that line and to possibly groom his 2-way play, not to make him spend the rest of his career on the 3rd line. And with Reasoner and Armstrong already there, it is already a good checking line.
Brendan
August 31st, 2009
5:04 pm
Finally, we get some news pertaining to Kalamazoo, Michigan. It’s ABOUT TIME! Say, how are WESTERN MICHIGAN’s CCHA prospects looking for this year? And when do they play Waddell’s alma mater, NORTHWESTERN MICHIGAN? (Looking suspiciously around. Did I get away with it?) Those Kalamazoo Wings players know how to PARTY!! Pyro’s on, Dude! Bet they were huge Def Leppard fans.
Hokie, thanks for the link to Wes Goldstein. He’s always good for a laugh. This time around, he was even “halfway” decent to the Thrashers. I did notice, however, that something YOU SIMPLY MUST KNOW about our Ice Birds is that they’re supposedly for sale, per Goldstein. Except there’s no sign in the window. Or on the property. Or in the financial news. I’m going to tell Wes Goldstein that the Brooklyn Bridge is for sale. And insist on being paid a commission up front, before closing, as a “finder’s fee.”
Sara, if the NHL’s 2015 salary cap is $70.3 million, I’m fine with it, provided that the Thrashers get $34.3 million in revenue-sharing.
Kracker, I had thought that this summer was Kari’s last RFA contract opportunity. But I was wrong. I do wonder if, in Kari’s world, (Party time!! Excellent!! Wailing on an air-guitar,) that means that this is yet another year he thinks he can approach games while being mentally unprepared? I know he’s had some offseason medical procedure, but he better be in shape for training camp. Or, at a minimum, be in shape for Opening Night. I still say he’s a good goalie, when he’s prepared. And this is a year where, arguably, we can say we have our best defensive corps yet. Bogosian, Enstrom, Kubina, Hainsey, Valabik, Salmella and Oystrick isn’t a “disasterous” combination of defenders. And who knows? Maybe we’ll see a call up for Chad Denny or Grant Lewis? Personally, I love it when a prospect develops! Kubina, in my estimation, is a one-year appointment. And is an upgrade to the 40-year old Matthieu Schneider. I just hope Kubina can net the Thrashers a 2nd round pick, like the Hebrew Hammer did.
Smoothie
August 31st, 2009
5:17 pm
Peverley got a ton of his points playing with Army and Slava. Pevs will need to earn the top center spot and outplay White in camp.
Rawhide
August 31st, 2009
6:00 pm
mid-ga-hockey fan – Welcome…ya know, we seem to be bringing out quite a number of “lurkers” around here lately. That’s a good thing and I hope it keeps up.
I agree with you as well about no one being “awarded” a position…that it should be earned. I also thing lines should be formed by who plays well together….to that point, that’s why I feel White, Kozzy and Little should remain together on the 2nd line.
Todd White
August 31st, 2009
6:08 pm
How about a little Love???
World Be Free
August 31st, 2009
7:09 pm
I believe Mid-GA brings up a great point about hte importance of camp. This team excelled in the 2nd half of last season for many reasons, one was the sense of competition. The players wanted ice time and they were willing to work for it. I think Anderson will move guys around in the preseason games, change things up and give various players the chance to earn spots instead of being “pegged” for them prior to camp.
White and Pevs will be in the mix from the start. One may end up on the 3rd line, depending on who earns the top spot.
I have a a few “I hopes” – I hope Kovy is signed prior to camp and I hope management has another move up their sleeves. I know I sound like a broken record, but I believe another set of skilled hands is needed to support the sense of competition.
World Be Free
August 31st, 2009
7:11 pm
And yes Mid-GA I played ice and street hockey for a long time. I have the dental work to prove it.
Sara
August 31st, 2009
7:28 pm
FedOrov – jeebus that is such a pet peeve of mine.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
8:27 pm
Smoothie, yeah you’re right Peverley did get points with Kozlov & Armstrong, but to me if the guy can score than he should be #1 center. I have nothing wrong with competition though.
World Be Free, even once the lines get set, you know as well as I do that slumps come and Anderson will change the lineups just to get certain players out of slumps.
Sara, Fedorov was also a Selke candidate. I know you know that but I just wanted to type it.
Brendan, yeah our last 3 defensemen won’t be a “disatrous” combination but if Shane Hnidy can be a bottom pairing guy for the conference winners last season, our bottom pair will be ok at least.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
8:33 pm
Smoothie, I re-read my thing and wanted to rephrase it that if he can score with a number of players then he should be #1, a point/game is a point/game. Now if he could only score or have chemistry with the 2nd line then fine, stick him there. But that’s not the case.
Smoothie
August 31st, 2009
9:30 pm
EOB – u r not taking into account the fact that Whitey had very good chemistry with Kovy down the stretch from early March on. I luv Pevs as much as the next guy but Pevs may not be “awarded” anything to start camp. 73 pts is 73 pts over 80 gms. Pevs may have had close to a pt / gm but it was still only over 39 gms. While I do think Pevs could put up 70+ pts with the same PP time that White was afforded, a big Russian named Nikolai may make it tuff for Pevs to crack the top PP unit. JA will have a very tuff decision to make and that is a very good thing for fans of the Thrashers.
Smoothie
August 31st, 2009
9:41 pm
Sure is weird on this blog without comments from alan and ranallo. Perhaps they are on vacation and will be ready to roll after Labor Day
Sara
August 31st, 2009
10:01 pm
EOB – he wasn’t just a Selke candidate … he was a two-time Selke winner. Probably had something to do with Bowman literally making him a defenseman.
The Earl of Bud
August 31st, 2009
10:40 pm
“73 pts is 73 pts over 80 gms.”
Haha, touche Smoothie. Ok maybe White does compete for the #1 center in camp as he played well with Kovalchuk too, I’ll give you that. Although your comment about Peverley getting 70+ if he gets the same PP time that White got doesn’t quite add up. White had 38 ES points to 34 PP points which means PP makes up about half of his point total. So White needs the PP to be a point/game player, right?. Peverley on the other hand had 28 ES points to 5 PP points in his 30+ games, so I don’t think he needs PP time to maintain that ~point/game pace. All based on last year only of course.
Sara, I’m not making official statements about Fedorov’s Selke status, I just wanted to say something, anything about him so I could spell his name correctly (since I was the one that got your pet peeve going and spelled it wrong the first time).
Brendan
August 31st, 2009
10:47 pm
EOB, I always liked Hnidy. He was a true professional. While here, he didn’t grumble much. He stayed in top shape. He went from the pressbox to playing top pairing minutes there for a while. Teammates tended to like him. And GM’s tend to want him, for the role he plays. Hnidy might be a journeyman, but he’s a good one.
I know, from this blog’s perspective, we care primarily about the Thrashers. But as a long time NHL fan, it made me feel good to see Chicago and Boston have great years. Those are great hockey markets, who are long suffering. The Blackhawks reached the CF for the first time since 1995. And won a playoff series for the 1st time since 1996, when they swept the Calgary Flames. Their last previous playoff berth was a forgettable series with St. Louis, in 2002. The Bruins won their 1st playoff series since 1999, when they knocked off Carolina that year. Boston went from 8th spot to top seed (#1) in the Conference in the space of a year. The Bruins won their third division title since 2002.
I was also pleased to see the Capitals win a playoff series. They came close in 2008, but lost in overtime of Game Seven to Philadelphia, after making a valiant series comeback, from down 3-1. This year, the Caps rallied from down, 3-1, to defeat the Rangers. But, they ran into the eventual Stanley Cup Champions in the second round. But, it’s worse than that. And I don’t mean to be dumping on our division rivals, but the Capitals led that series, 2-0, and had an overtime opportunity in Game Three versus the Penguins. Unfortunately for Washington, Kris Letang scored for Pittsburgh, and the series, AND THE ENTIRE PLAYOFFS, changed direction with that goal. It is truly a feather in the Penguins’ cap to have overcome two series which began with 2-0 deficits. Especially in the Finals, against a team the caliber of Detroit.
Sara
August 31st, 2009
11:02 pm
BTW, a number of tweets from Dmitry Chesnokov (PuckDaddy readers will know who he is) re: Kovalchuk, with the most interesting and pertinent being: “I stopped in Atlanta on my way from Miami where my wife and I bought a condo. I met with Antropov but did not speak with Waddell”
Kovy is due back in town on Sept. 8th. Also, Zherdev does not have a contract but “negotiations were ongoing.” no indication of team(s).
World Be Free
August 31st, 2009
11:08 pm
You know Brendan, Boston and Chicago were never the same after they left their old buildings. I never went to games in Chicago, but I did pass through Boston on occasion. The Boston Garden was the dirtest hole in the NHL, especially near the end when it was scheduled to close. But it was a great place to watch a game and be a Bruins’ fan. The place was small and the seats were close the players. Intimidating for sure! Their new building is not the same as the old place. Both teams are finally coming back and it is good for the league.
Shane Hnidy – I was a 5th or 6th dman on some of the teams I play on. Being a defensive defenseman is like being an offensive lineman. The only time you hear your name is when something goes wrong. You better love the game.
Sara
August 31st, 2009
11:11 pm
Also, Portzline revealed that Malhotra represented the BJs at the NHLPA meeting. Interesting. Also makes me wonder who was the rep for the Thrash since X held that position here.
Hijacker
September 1st, 2009
3:30 am
“a pick-up of Zherdev would do nothing but help this team,I have seen clips of his play w/NYR,I personally think he is much better talentwise than MM”
Clips? Stats? How you check out his attitude?
I remember how Ranger fans were upbeat when they seemingly robbed the Jackets last summer, despite the Jackets fans calling for caution on this guy.
DW…stay the hell away from Zherdev! I’m convinced this is one of only a few occasions where DW and I are on the same line.
GaVaHokie
September 1st, 2009
8:28 am
Kovy is due back in town on Sept. 8th.
Hmmm… that makes my Sept. 9th wager for a new contract pretty tough.
GaVaHokie
September 1st, 2009
8:39 am
Fairly humorous video of Antropov and Ponikarovsky… I think Antropov is gonna have to change his choice of Beverage in Atlanta.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oINuqLe1brY&feature=related
lee
September 1st, 2009
3:14 pm
hokie-just keep countin down the days!
HAHAHA that was soooo hilarious!!! HAHA! definetly gonna hav to change!
lee
September 1st, 2009
3:15 pm
sry guys i haven’t been postin, my bro was in the hospital.
Brendan
September 1st, 2009
3:18 pm
There were TWO guesses for September 9th. Time of day could become a factor. I think Alan’s guess of Aug. 29th just passed. I should double-check that, though. Once September 9th passes, the remaining guesses are all some time in 2010. I think three of the guesses actually have Kovy going to another team.