The NBA’s free-agent period has officially started.
Teams can now come to contract terms with free agents. Deals can’t become official until July 11, after the league and union complete their annual audit to set the projected salary cap and luxury-tax levels for the 2012-13 season.
Nine Hawks players became unrestricted free agents today: Jason Collins, Erick Dampier, Willie Green, Kirk Hinrch, Ivan Johnson, Tracy McGrady, Jannero Pargo, Vladimir Radmanovic and Jerry Stackhouse. All those players except for Hinrich played for the league minimum last season.
Update: The Hawks extended a qualifying offer to Johnson by Sunday’s deadline. He’s a restricted free agent with Atlanta maintaining salary-matching rights.
NBA.com has a cool, sortable free-agent tracker page. One potential free agent is already off the market as Kevin Garnett and the Celtics reportedly agreed to a three-year, $34 million contract.
The Hawks are over the salary cap but have full mid-level and bi-annual exceptions available in addition to minimum player salary exceptions.
The MLE can be used to sign free agents for as many as four years at a maximum starting salary of $5 million with annual raises of as much as 4.5 percent. It can be split to sign more than one player.
The BAE can be used to sign free agents for as many as two years at a maximum starting salary of $1.957 million with a raise of up to 4.5 percent in the second year. It can be split to sign more than one player.
Minimum salary contracts can be up to two years in length. The salary is determined based on the player’s experience.
Michael Cunningham, Hawks beat
Follow ajchawks on Twitter.
280 comments Add your comment
glw
July 1st, 2012
12:17 am
So I guess Ivan wasnt tendered….what are the chances he still returns? OR do the Hawks move on without him?
Brandy Blair
July 1st, 2012
12:18 am
FIRST!
Shamrock
July 1st, 2012
12:20 am
The ball is in your court Najeh, or should I say 10 year olds in your court
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:20 am
FTPB
“Yep, because Ray can make a bunch of step back jumpers in isolation and guard the opposing teams best perimeter player. Yep . . Ray sure could replace JJ’s production. Especially with Josh Smith averaging 7 assists a game now feeding him the ball for 15 shots a game.”
Haha. You’re the one who CONSTANTLY talks about how the Hawks can trade one of the ten best defenders in the league for a guy who is soft as tissue paper and the defense won’t suffer because everyone else will step up and play better man to man defense or whatever. That is a hell of a lot more far fetched than me saying replacing Joe with a guy who can score just as efficiently with the ball in his hands a lot less will result in this team remaining just as good.
Rob
July 1st, 2012
12:21 am
As a fan, we havent heard this much trade rumors involving the Hawks in a looooooong time
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
12:23 am
Well that’s exactly where I’m going to start Najeh. I’m going to change the mix of the team to form one of the best frontlines in the NBA with Gasol and Horford, while keeping JJ and Teague together. Add some specialty players here and there, and see if that can get us to the next level at least, even if it doesn’t produce a championship.
What I’m not going to do, is blow this team up and hope for a Hall of Fame draft pick to turn my fortunes around.
If it fails, I now have the option to trade Gasol and his 19 million for other tangible pieces, whether it be decent players or draft picks.
I decide if Jeff Teague is worth keeping around as the future PG of the Hawks. If he is, I’m starting at 5 years 30 million.
All the while, I’m trying to flip JJ for draft picks and possibly a disgruntled star player somewhere else, just like I did with Gasol if it comes down to that.
The longer JJ contract grows, the more likely someone will actually give us pieces for that contract. Even with this new CBA, a team would trade for JJ’s contract in years 5 and 6, and give us something we can use back in return.
Your plan is about blowing it up, and hope that fate drops the player of that decade into our laps. My plan is to keep swapping out “the Core”, until we find a combination that works.
I know free agents aren’t knocking down the door to play in Atlanta, so me tanking to get 40 million in cap space is out of the question. To get Dwight, I would trade ANY combination of 2 of the Core right now, and force that dude to come here for a year. If a team was serious about getting Dwight, that’s how they’d do it.
So trade Al and JJ . . or JJ and Smith . . or Smith and Al for Dwight . . and go from there.
He ain’t coming here of his own free will. Gotta force that dude to come, and hope he likes it here in his hometown.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:23 am
Northcyde, ultimately this all comes down to the fact that your idea of a “winner” and my idea of a “winner” are very different. You are satisfied with a team that will win 45 games and lose in the second round indefinitely, as you practically admit with your remarks about the Grizzlies. I am satisfied with no less than a team that has a legitimate shot at winning a title. This is why you want to go to war with a Joe-Gasol core while I want to blow the team up.
welikebaseball2
July 1st, 2012
12:23 am
Any player/players we can sign for even the $5 million MLE next season still won’t give us what we need to become a true contender. We need a superstar. You know, one like what Joe’s getting paid to be.
prison mike
July 1st, 2012
12:25 am
Damn MC, just had an emmy winning post in the last blog in progress….
Najeh quote,
“Well, first of all, you still have Marvin on the roster. If I had to rebuild the Hawks into a winner and I found a sucker dumb enough to trade for Joe’s contract, my first move after that would be to amnesty Marvin.
With that said, this isn’t too hard. Josh and Zaza are UFAs, Teague is a RFA, and Al and JJ12 are under contract. In other words, I have about $13 million of committed salaries, plus the $3 or $4 million for Teague’s QO, which means I have nearly $40 million of cap space.
Go hard after Dwight and Josh to try to get them to team up here. If Dwight and Josh say yes, that’s still only going to cost you about $30 million of that cap space, which means you have plenty of room to add another free agent or trade for another near-All Star level player to be the 3rd option. You can still sign Teague to the qualifying offer and trade Al for a SG or SF to balance out the starting lineup. That team will be at least as good as any team the Hawks have had in their entire history here.
If Dwight says no, I assume Josh will also say no, and you will be left with Teague, Al, and a ton of cap space. In other words, you have a ton of cap flexibility and two positions (PG and PF) locked down with three to fill.
So sign-and-trade Josh for a trade exception and picks (this is possible — LeBron and Bosh were also sign-and-traded for trade exceptions and picks), use these picks to trade up in the draft (since they will likely be in the 20s), tank for a season, get a high draft pick of your own, and draft the best player this team has had since Dominique Wilkins. And in the summer of 2014 after you have used your lottery pick, you can always accelerate the rebuilding process by offering a front-loaded deal to a restricted free agent (if we were talking this summer, that would be someone like James Harden or Eric Gordon for example).
I have a better question for you. Keep Joe on this roster and build a team that has a serious chance to win a championship. Go. And before you start, Joe and Gasol are not going anywhere near a championship together.”
Almost point for point what’ll do except some a caveats. Assuming we get Marshon in any trade, I’ll try to engage Dwight for a rental to get him “acclamated” to playing in Atlanta. Maybe something like Al, Marvin for Dwight, pick.
Trade deadline team would be something like…
JT / ….
Marshon / Jenkins
Who knows maybe Josh will play here some or Scott or FA.
Josh / Ivan / Scott
Dwight / Zaza
Got some holes to fill but that’s a crazy good team. If Dwight and Josh bolts well… we are assed out.
Edit:If a rental of Dwight is just a formaillity, I would only offer Teague, Jenkins, and Duck and future pick heavily protected.
Michael Cunningham
July 1st, 2012
12:28 am
@ prison mike “Damn MC, just had an emmy winning post in the last blog in progress….”
sorry dude
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:29 am
“If it fails, I now have the option to trade Gasol and his 19 million for other tangible pieces, whether it be decent players or draft picks.”
When (not if) it fails, nobody is going to give you tangible pieces for a 33 year old, declining PF making $19 million.
“All the while, I’m trying to flip JJ for draft picks and possibly a disgruntled star player somewhere else, just like I did with Gasol if it comes down to that.”
Nobody is going to even give you more than marginal players, cap space, and protected picks for Joe now, let alone in two or three years when he is struggling to score 15 points per game. “Disgruntled star player”? Keep dreaming, unless you have the 2012 version of T-Mac in mind.
“My plan is to keep swapping out “the Core”, until we find a combination that works.”
How many teams have kept swapping out their core until they found a combination that works? I can think of exactly one — the 2011 Mavs. Who else?
On the other hand, I can think of at least ten teams that lucked out in the lottery and acquired the pieces that eventually won them a title.
“I know free agents aren’t knocking down the door to play in Atlanta, so me tanking to get 40 million in cap space is out of the question.”
More willful blindness to the fact that cap space is useful for a lot more than just signing unrestricted free agents.
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
12:30 am
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:20 am
FTPB
“Yep, because Ray can make a bunch of step back jumpers in isolation and guard the opposing teams best perimeter player. Yep . . Ray sure could replace JJ’s production. Especially with Josh Smith averaging 7 assists a game now feeding him the ball for 15 shots a game.”
Haha. You’re the one who CONSTANTLY talks about how the Hawks can trade one of the ten best defenders in the league for a guy who is soft as tissue paper and the defense won’t suffer because everyone else will step up and play better man to man defense or whatever. That is a hell of a lot more far fetched than me saying replacing Joe with a guy who can score just as efficiently with the ball in his hands a lot less will result in this team remaining just as good.
*********************
The difference is that there is evidence that proves that Gasol does play defense and can definitely play offense. The whole “soft” label is just that. A label. It’s just like calling Josh “dumb”. He isn’t “dumb” to the extent that it completely takes away from his overall talent. He just does a few dumb things from time to time and has bad shot selection.
The same goes for Gasol and his “softness”. He’s not soft vs every team that he plays against, and it doesn’t take away from the fact that he’s still a top 5 PF.
And once again, I already have Josh Smith’s replacement on board in the form of Al Horford.
Horford + Gasol > Smith + Horford
The difference in bringing Ray Allen on in place of JJ, is that there is no equivalent to JJ in talent level. I mean, unless you’re all of a sudden a believer in John Jenkins.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:34 am
“If Dwight and Josh bolts well… we are assed out.”
If Dwight and Josh bolt, the Hawks are still in better shape with $40 million in cap space and two positions accounted for than they are with the current core or, worse, a Joe-Gasol-Al core. Teague, Al, and $40 million can turn into a superior team if they play their cards right. This core or a Joe-Gasol-Al core will never be more than a second-round team.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:35 am
“The difference is that there is evidence that proves that Gasol does play defense and can definitely play offense. The whole “soft” label is just that. A label.”
There is a hell of a lot more evidence that Ray Allen, a Hall of Fame player, can create his own shot, since he did so for ten years before going to Boston. Not that they will need him to, with Josh drawing double teams and kicking it to him on the three point line.
MakingNoSense
July 1st, 2012
12:35 am
@Northcyde.. Dude, you can’t be a businessman. We only got 6 players under contract and those six players already put us about 4 million over the salary cap. So your solution is to trade away a 26 year josh smith for a 31 year Pau Gasol, who makes 6 million dollars more than Josh. So now you would be roughly 10 million dollars over the salary cap with only 6 players signed. Again, tell us how you would fill out your roster under this circumstance.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:37 am
“The difference in bringing Ray Allen on in place of JJ, is that there is no equivalent to JJ in talent level.”
So now an individual player’s talent level matters? All this time I thought we were talking about team success as defined by vague concepts like “balance”. Now that we are talking about Joe, we need to find an equivalent in talent level? Interesting how the fact that Josh is infinitely more talented than Gasol on defense doesn’t seem to matter as much.
Rob
July 1st, 2012
12:40 am
Joe Johnson is from Arkansas, he needs that hog money, thats why he signed that fat contract
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:40 am
FTPB
“NO ONE WANTS TO PLAY IN ATLANTA”
No one wants to play in Oklahoma City either. Of course, if you draft them, they have no choice but to play for you.
Blow it up and tank.
Rob
July 1st, 2012
12:41 am
I agree with you Najeh, but its gonna suck to suck again for a few years. But its the only way
Moorman
July 1st, 2012
12:41 am
Another thing that makes getting rid of joe in the best interest of the hawks : the fanbase in atlanta NEEDS a superstar. Its no accident that atlanta fans, mostly from out of town but now living in atlanta, root for the superstars on the other team. Dame thing happened to the falcons UNTIL they drafted nique. David sterns should be ashamed of himself for not pulling strings over the years to appease a fanbase which could be a top ten fanbase. Like najeh said, you clear up all that cap space and go get dwight at all costs………
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:41 am
Omer Asik just got offered $8 million a year by Houston. $8 million a year for a guy who can’t even play more than 20 minutes a game because of foul trouble.
richy
July 1st, 2012
12:42 am
Would you take Farmar, Brooks, and Lopez for Joe and Marvin?
Frank
July 1st, 2012
12:42 am
If we trade Joe Johnson to the Nets we’ll just be making the Nets better and we will get worse.
Moorman
July 1st, 2012
12:43 am
Meant to say the flcons had a poor fanbase until they drafted vick. The hawks need something similar to happen..
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
12:44 am
frank, gotta get worse to get better in the NBA. unless you’re the celtics or lakers. they have the league behind them. but for your run-of-the-mill team, you gotta get worse.
prison mike
July 1st, 2012
12:45 am
“Joe-Gasol-Al core will never be more than a second-round team.”
I’m in agreement of that but losing Al for almost nothing but a fighter’s chance at greatness is hard to swallow..
Dwight has a bee line straight to Crook. I would just leave Dwight alone unless Josh gave me some inclination we had a solid chance of keeping everything together. I’m sure some teams can offer us more for even a 4-5 month renter for him
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
12:46 am
How many teams have kept swapping out their core until they found a combination that works? I can think of exactly one — the 2011 Mavs. Who else?
On the other hand, I can think of at least ten teams that lucked out in the lottery and acquired the pieces that eventually won them a title.
**************
No you can’t. Shoot, there hasn’t been 10 teams in the past 25 years to win a title, let alone for you to be able to name more than 5 teams that have PURPOSELY tanked on purpose.
San Antonio got Duncan because Robinson went down with a season ending injury and they lucked up in the draft.
The Lakers of the late 90s got Shaq because he wanted to go there
Boston traded all of their young talent for stars of bad teams who couldn’t advance their squad to the next level
Even the Heat this year had to basically collude to entice Lebron and Bosh to come to Miami to join Wade, in a move never seen before.
******
Meanwhile, Detroit kept swapping out pieces, and coaches, until they got the right mix.
So did the Heat in 2005, when they were able to trade their young pieces for Shaq
Boston, as before mentioned, traded their young talent for star players
As a matter of fact, it is almost unprecedented for a playoff level team to purposely sell off everybody and tank, just to get that lottery pick. That process almost always happens after the team fails to make the playoffs.
Melvin
July 1st, 2012
12:47 am
northcyde,
In your trade scenario Josh for Paul. Let’s consider that the road to the finals goes thru Miami. The Heat have already said that Lebron will play more PF next season with Bosh at the C. With a frontline of Gasol and Horford, who will play Lebron? And if you take one of them out the game, then you now have a core member on the bench during crunch time b/c of matchups….
Rob
July 1st, 2012
12:48 am
If they do trade Joe, I wonder if they trade Josh as well?
jeppz23
July 1st, 2012
12:49 am
are there any black people up here? I’m tryna get 360 waves
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
12:49 am
richy.
HELL YES YOU TAKE brooks lopez and farmer for Joe and Marvin! What kinda question is that?
PG: teague / brooks / farmar
SG: FA – Mayo (we should pursue him) / jenkins
SF: Josh *until he gets traded below*
PF: horf / *see below*
C: lopez / zaza
* here is where we go ahead and trade Josh along with 2 future 1st round picks. We send him to HOU who wanted him and we get back 1 of their draft picks – Royce White, and 2 other players. Probably Scola and I would prefer Ariza so our lineup would look like this
PG: teague / brooks / farmar
SG: MAYO / jenkins
SF: ariza / white
PF: horf / scola
C: lopez / zaza
that is a championship squad right there. go out and get Jerry Sloan to run pick and rolls all game with Teague/Brooks handling the ball and you have your choice between horford, lopez, scola and zaza as pick men. does anyone find it coincidental Ferry came from the best pick-and-roll team in the spurs? Jerry Sloan is out there just WAITING to coach and we have an ultra-quick guard in teague and a good pick-man in Horford….. get it done!
prison mike
July 1st, 2012
12:50 am
Meant to say a short rental for Dwight. There’s always one team that will on up us in trade value. Reminds me of when the lock out lifted.
Oh yeah, meant to say earlier Ferry has to make his signature move and the time is now. He’s locked in long term and needs capital to do things his way. I’m sure Joe, marv’s contract are a hindrance to him.
NCBravesFan
July 1st, 2012
12:52 am
Interesting discussion going on here between Najeh and Northcyde. My guess is that what ends up happening is somewhere between the two scenarios they outline.
I doubt Ferry will “blow it up” this quickly, but he also has to know that if he can move Joe’s contract off the books he has to do that. If he can’t, my guess is either Josh goes traded (not as likely) or Marvin gets the amnesty clause (more likely).
This team as constructed is close, but salary constraints hold it back from taking the next step. My guess is Ferry will try to create a little salary cap space and keep some core pieces together for one more shot … and save the bigger changes for a bit later.
MrNique
July 1st, 2012
12:53 am
If we did a deal with Brooklyn and could. Clear some space. People be interested in maybe offering OJ Mayo a contract as a cheaper 2?
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
12:55 am
i think we trade Joe to the Nets for Lopez and any other asset they are willing to give up to us. I’m a huge fan of lopez. We engage HOU in trade talks ASAP and see if they’re willing to part with any 1 of their 3 rookies they just drafted, particularly Royce White, and another piece for Smith. That’s fair trade value if you ask me.
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
12:55 am
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:37 am
“The difference in bringing Ray Allen on in place of JJ, is that there is no equivalent to JJ in talent level.”
So now an individual player’s talent level matters? All this time I thought we were talking about team success as defined by vague concepts like “balance”. Now that we are talking about Joe, we need to find an equivalent in talent level? Interesting how the fact that Josh is infinitely more talented than Gasol on defense doesn’t seem to matter as much.
********************
Individual talent has ALWAYS mattered. That’s why I’d welcome a flip of Gasol for Josh. that is also why I would welcome a flip for JJ for Eric Gordon or even a Tyreke Evans. You would at least get a comparable talent back in return for JJ, that could potentially develop into something that fits the team better.
Josh is a great help defender. He’s not a great man defender.
Of course, I could bring up stats stating how Gasol is a better post defender than Smith, but that won’t mean a thing because stats mean nothing around here.
Once again, it’s the combination of a Horford + Gasol frontline that could take this team to the next level, because they both are highly efficient on offense, and can play defense as well. No one is going to mistake them for being the great help defender that Josh Smith is, but no one is going to mistake Josh Smith for being a great spot up shooter or a great post up player either.
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
12:56 am
MrNique, go a few posts up and I said we should go after Mayo. approach HOU with a package of Smith and future picks after the Joe trade and build around Horf / Teague / Mayo / Lopez
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
12:56 am
“No you can’t. Shoot, there hasn’t been 10 teams in the past 25 years to win a title, let alone for you to be able to name more than 5 teams that have PURPOSELY tanked on purpose.”
I never said they purposely tanked. I said they got the pieces that won them a title through the draft in the lottery. Spurs with Duncan-Parker-Ginobili, Lakers with Kobe (and Bynum later), Boston with Pierce and Rondo, Rockets with Hakeem, Heat with Wade, Bulls with Jordan-Pippen, Pistons with Isiah and Dumars, Lakers with Magic-Kareem-Worthy, Celtics with Bird and McHale. That is 8 of the last 11 champions and all but three of the last 30 NBA seasons. If I go back in time farther I’m sure I can find you more but that requires doing research whereas the teams I named were off the top of my head.
“So did the Heat in 2005, when they were able to trade their young pieces for Shaq”
The Heat’s best player that year was Wade, who they drafted in the lottery. And Shaq is one of the most dominant players of all time. Gasol is nowhere close. Where is your trade proposal swapping out a member of this core for someone of Shaq’s caliber?
“Meanwhile, Detroit kept swapping out pieces, and coaches, until they got the right mix.”
We have already established on this blog that the ‘04 Pistons were the exception to rule all exceptions and that Sund’s insistence on following that model was foolish. Yes, you are right, they swapped out pieces of their core until they got it to work. But even they had a guy in Ben Wallace who was the best in the league at one end of the floor. Show me one trade proposal that swaps out the member of the core for a guy who is the best in the league at anything.
Gasol is just another pretty good player, just like Joe is a pretty good player and Al is a pretty good player. A nice collection of pretty good players will get destroyed by greatness EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Get in the lottery and bring greatness to Atlanta.
Steve belkin
July 1st, 2012
12:58 am
But everybody said i was wrong about joe……
Shamrock
July 1st, 2012
1:01 am
Moorman
July 1st, 2012
1:01 am
Najeh is right, blow this crap up and get a superstar……. The hawks been in atlanta since 1970 and havent smelt a trophy, so blowing it up and waiting a couple more years aint gonna hurt nothing…..
Coach van gundy
July 1st, 2012
1:02 am
Dwight got me fired for nothing…….
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:03 am
NCBraves . . . the difference between Najeh and I is that he’d get rid of JJ for a slug and some rotten tomatoes. He’ll simply give up on trying to get the best deal possible in a JJ trade.
I’m trying to get real assets for that dude, if a decision to trade JJ is made. Despite his contract, that’s a top 5 SG we’re talking about here. No way I just “give” him away.
My problem with the whole deal, is that people would have a fit if we just gave Josh Smith away for nothing ( or a bunch of expiring contracts ). That doesn’t help the Hawks, and it doesn’t put fans in the seats. And the same thing applies with JJ. What was the use of acquiring all of this talent, if we couldn’t flip it when we felt they couldn’t progress any longer.
LOL . . even Washington flipped Rashard Lewis for Okafor and Trevor Ariza . . . but we have to settle for some Nets benchwarmers?
I say hell no to that.
Grandad
July 1st, 2012
1:05 am
I categorically deny that Jerry Sundusky and I were and are best friends. I dont know where you guys are reporting this stuff.
Jerry got caught dead to rights. Im still here. Go figure.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:06 am
“Josh is a great help defender. He’s not a great man defender.
Of course, I could bring up stats stating how Gasol is a better post defender than Smith, but that won’t mean a thing because stats mean nothing around here.”
They mean nothing when presented without the right context. Gasol is 7 feet tall and has long arms. He is bigger than pretty much every opponent he faces at PF throughout the course of the season, and is bigger than many Cs he faces as well. The PFs and Cs he faces who have a low skill level are going to struggle against him purely because of his size and length, regardless of whether he is physical or fundamentally sound defensively, and that is consequently going to make his defensive stats look good.
The same applies for Andrea Bargnani, for example, whose defensive stats at PF are even better than Gasol’s. The stats say he gives up a 13.2 PER to opposing PFs. You can either take that stat at face value and decide that he is an elite defender of PFs, or you can watch him play and recognize that the number doesn’t really tell you what you think it’s telling you.
Those aggregate stats, however, say NOTHING about what a player will do against playoff competition, against players who are good enough to exploit his weaknesses.
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
1:08 am
“What player out there in free agency could turn the Hawks into an EC Finals team, if we had JJ’s money off the books, and no JJ in ATL?”
Ok so without Joe, the Hawks are not an ECF team. So what? WITH Joe the Hawks are not an ECF team. So what’s the difference? With cap flexibility in Joe’s absense, hope exists that the Hawks can make moves to improve. If Joe remains on the books as his skills diminish, we may be paying him $25m while visiting the lottery. How is the certainty of losing Josh and paying Joe more than LeBron makes while he’s no longer an All-Star caliber player a better fate than the uncertainty of change?
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:08 am
Moorman . . if it were that easy, where is Sacramento’s “superstar”
Charlotte’s?
Golden State’s?
Detroit’s?
Washington’s?
New Jersey’s? ( even though they had to trade to get the star they got )
Did the tank and re-plank plan work for them?
Ya’ll make it sound like all the Hawks have to do is just get rid of everybody, and everything will be OK in 4 years.
1) we went through this before, and it took 5 years just to steal JJ from Phoenix, and get lucky enough to get Horford as a top 3 pick . . so that rebuild took 8 years
2) lol . . we might all be dead in 4 years
So is this where we are as a fan base? That we’re so “disgusted” of losing in the playoffs, that we’re willing to be bad for 4 years just for a chance to maybe get back at the level we’re at now?
Moorman
July 1st, 2012
1:09 am
Northcyde……….you want to settle for being JUST good……look, trust me on this, if ferry blows the hawks up and gets into the lottery, no way, no how, he makes the same dumb draft picks billy knight did…….who cares qbout the hawks making the playoffs only to get bounced? We need a chip and dont have the cap space right now to get nowhere near it…….
Shamrock
July 1st, 2012
1:09 am
Meanwhile, KG will expose your Hawks for 2 more years, maybe 3. Just like Najeh exposes himself to 10 year old boys.
BravesFan79
July 1st, 2012
1:10 am
I only trade JJ to the nets if we get back Morrow in the deal. He was one of the top shooters in the league while with the Warriors, and the former GT guard can shoot it like few others in the league! He would basically be a cheaper / younger version of Jamal Crawford. He wouldnt provide the same defense, or low post offense as JJ, but he would add to the overall team speed/ quickness.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:11 am
“But everybody said i was wrong about joe……”
Belkin, you were wrong about Joe. The initial trade to bring Joe here was a great trade. The initial contract he received was a great contract. The Hawks’ major screw up was not bringing Joe here — it was failing to draft CP3 to team with Joe in the back court.
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
1:11 am
Joe to Nets for Lopez and Brooks.
Smith + Marvin + 2013 1st round to Rockets for Scola, Ariza, White.
Hire Jerry Sloan
Sign OJ Mayo.
PG: Teague / Brooks / Pargo
SG: Mayo / Jenkins / Green
SF: Ariza / White
PF: Horford / Scola / I. Johnson (RE-DAMN-SIGN IVAN THE TERRIBLE!)
C: Lopez / Zaza
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
1:12 am
All I can say with regards to Ivan is maybe they are trying to act disinterested in him to keep the market down. The Hawks took a chance on him when other teams wouldn’t, given his past. At one point I was certain that he would be a restricted free agent and sign an qualifying offer with another team that the Hawks wouldn’t have the available cap room to match without going into the luxury tax. I think the Hawks are playing possum with Ivan to avoid a bidding war, hoping they can still sign him to a minimum contract.
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:13 am
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
1:08 am
“What player out there in free agency could turn the Hawks into an EC Finals team, if we had JJ’s money off the books, and no JJ in ATL?”
Ok so without Joe, the Hawks are not an ECF team. So what? WITH Joe the Hawks are not an ECF team. So what’s the difference? With cap flexibility in Joe’s absense, hope exists that the Hawks can make moves to improve. If Joe remains on the books as his skills diminish, we may be paying him $25m while visiting the lottery. How is the certainty of losing Josh and paying Joe more than LeBron makes while he’s no longer an All-Star caliber player a better fate than the uncertainty of change?
***************
Well you can trade Josh for another player that can replace his production, This is actually the time to do that, if we’re certain that we’re going to lose him.
As for JJ, there have been many players who weren’t worth what they are at the end of their contract, yet, were still valuable cogs to the team. Ray Allen is one of those guys. Even if JJ isn’t the top option on the team anymore, the team can still be good if one of our current guys blossoms into a star, or we trade our young guys for that star.
And I still say that you just don’t have to give away JJ. Get something other than expiring contracts for that dude.
The fan base shouldn’t be so emotional than they’re willing to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Just change out the bathwater and re-wash the baby.
P.J.Openhiemer
July 1st, 2012
1:15 am
Trade AL Horford and JJ to Orlando for Dwight Howard and JJ Redick
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:17 am
“Ya’ll make it sound like all the Hawks have to do is just get rid of everybody, and everything will be OK in 4 years.”
You make it sound like all the Hawks have to do is replace their best player with someone who is roughly the same level as him and everything will be OK now. Obviously they have to get their draft picks right, which those franchises you named failed to do. But why do you assume Ferry is going to screw up his draft pick when he gets a chance to add a superstar player? He is, after all, the best GM this team has had in at least 17 years.
“it took 5 years just to steal JJ from Phoenix”
Haha. It took five years precisely because they tried it your way. Instead of blowing up the Mookie-Smitty-Mutombo Hawks, they tried to swap out the core for new pieces like Isaiah Rider and Jim Jackson and Theo Ratliff. When that didn’t work, they tried to add more tangible pieces instead of using draft picks, resulting in the acquisitions of Shareef and Glenn Robinson which each cost this team a top ten draft pick. If they had just blown it up and tanked from the start, they probably would have rebuilt a lot quicker.
And in any case, they would have easily been a playoff team by 2006 at the latest if they had used their top 10 picks in 2004 and 2005 correctly. Obviously that is not a given, but it is a hell of a lot more likely than Joe and Gasol leading a team to anything meaningful.
brigadierjerry
July 1st, 2012
1:18 am
For all of your FA updates:
http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
1:19 am
P.J.Openhiemer, ORL is the only team that I would be willing to trade Horford to and thats because we’d be getting Dwight back. Otherwise, I’m completely against trading Horford. He’s the player we need to build around at the 4 spot by getting rid of (hopefully) Joe and potentially Josh.
But again, unless we’re trading with ORL I say Horford and Teague are the only untouchables on this team.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:19 am
“Well you can trade Josh for another player that can replace his production, ”
I notice how you use the word “replace” instead of “upgrade”. Your implication is correct — Gasol will replace, not upgrade, Josh’s production. In other words, this team will remain in exactly the same place it currently finds itself, only with more long-term salary committed.
NCBravesFan
July 1st, 2012
1:19 am
Buddy @ 1:08 … That gets to the heart of the matter right there! Ferry is most likely not going to blow this roster up immediately. More likely he makes a trade to give the remaining pieces one more shot before making larger scale changes.
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:20 am
Melvin
July 1st, 2012
12:47 am
northcyde,
In your trade scenario Josh for Paul. Let’s consider that the road to the finals goes thru Miami. The Heat have already said that Lebron will play more PF next season with Bosh at the C. With a frontline of Gasol and Horford, who will play Lebron? And if you take one of them out the game, then you now have a core member on the bench during crunch time b/c of matchups…
******************
The flipside to that question is . . . who is going to play Gasol on offense with a frontline of Horford and Gasol coming at them?
Do they match up Lebron on Gasol? Bosh on Gasol?
- Teague guards Chalmers
- Johnson guards Wade
- Jenkins guards Battier ( easy cover for him )
- Horford guards Lebron
- Gasol guards Bosh
When we have the ball
Chalmers guards Teague
Battier guards Johnson
Wade guards Jenkins
Lebron guards Horford ( who will be out on the perimeter more )
Bosh guards Gasol
Matchup issues for both teams.
We always have the option to go zone, in order to pack it in on Lebron. If they go zone against us, JJ and especially Jenkins may shoot them right out of it.
aizdaman
July 1st, 2012
1:20 am
Joe Johnson has just been traded
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
1:21 am
Jettison the Core..No shot at an ECF..Two escorts to the Rim? No thanks……
P.J.Openhiemer
July 1st, 2012
1:21 am
This core or a Joe-Gasol-Al core will never be more than a second-round team.
What a waste of personnel. Gasol would give up knowing that freeloading Al and ISO were his teams.
this team would be a step backwards. Where is the Go to player ? Joe second seated to Josh this year and is slowing declining. Al? Al peaked and is about as average as it gets. Hes definitely no go to guy and you certainly dont want to build around him.
That leave Gasol who believes in World Championships and would give up on these scrubb with a quickness.
This team doesnt make it out of the second round.
aizdaman
July 1st, 2012
1:21 am
for Lopez and a 2013 protected draft pick
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
1:23 am
Gasol is done tasting NBA Championships without Kobe in his prime……
Is Kobe in his prime? Hmmmmmmmm
Rusty
July 1st, 2012
1:24 am
Nortcyce get real how many times will jj play like crap in the playoffs before you stop kissing his butt. JJ is a large part of what is wrong with our offense. To get rid of JJ without also getting rid of LD is not enough.
P.J.Openhiemer
July 1st, 2012
1:24 am
Horford guards Lebron LMAO
Al cant protect the rim and doesnt want to. tiny nate robinson and tony parker showcase over Al and you expect Al to guard Lebron?
Its thought like that the lead the hawks to the lottery.
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:25 am
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:19 am
“Well you can trade Josh for another player that can replace his production, ”
I notice how you use the word “replace” instead of “upgrade”. Your implication is correct — Gasol will replace, not upgrade, Josh’s production. In other words, this team will remain in exactly the same place it currently finds itself, only with more long-term salary committed.
********************
That’s up for debate Najeh.
Gasol is the better offensive player. Josh is the better defensive player. It depends on whether a person believes who is the better all around player. What player will fit the team better chemistry wise.
Buddy . . this is for you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU__2eWaecQ
Grandad
July 1st, 2012
1:27 am
Who is taking my posts down. I did not get caught with Sandusky, OK. So stop taking my posts down.
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
1:29 am
You get rid of Joe, Larry, and Marvin, within 3 years the Hawks are knocking on the door [ECF] Danny..
Remember this is the East not the West…
richy
July 1st, 2012
1:30 am
The Nets would have a legitimate big three with Johnson, Williams, and Howard! A big star, a big contract and a big ego.
BravesFan79
July 1st, 2012
1:30 am
Anyone who says “blow it up” obviously isnt much of a sports fan. If it were that easy, the Bobcats/Clippers/Nets/ Bucks and other bottom feeders for years would be contenders by now. We have to keep Horford/ Smith to be a top team.
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
1:31 am
Nobody has answered me.. What do you guys think of a trade with HOU? They wanted Smith pre-draft. Give them a Smith/Williams/draft pick package.
Now that we saw they drafted (Royce White) a guy we wanted we need to swoop in and grab that pick off their hands. Royce is another Lamar Odom. A true Point-Forward who can handle it. We would obviously get at least 1 other player, maybe 2 thrown in there. They would have to do Scola to match up salaries, and I would guess as a salary dump they could do Trevor Ariza since Marvin plays the same position. Smith replaces Scola and they get rid of one drafted guy.
I think that’s the best value we could get for Smith. Scola is a proven talent who will hit the boards and has proven he’s not against playing on a second unit. He wouldn’t come in and need to start. He could be a solid second unit leader behind Horford in some kind of offense that runs through the PF, much like SA’s did through Duncan the whole time Ferry was there……….
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:31 am
Rusty
July 1st, 2012
1:24 am
Nortcyce get real how many times will jj play like crap in the playoffs before you stop kissing his butt. JJ is a large part of what is wrong with our offense. To get rid of JJ without also getting rid of LD is not enough.
***********************
Crusty, in no part of this discussion have you seen me type the words “I don’t want to trade Joe Johnson”. Unlike most of the Josh Smith backers, who don’t want that guy traded for anyone but Dwight Howard.
My stance is simply get assets more than just expiring contracts for JJ.
And JJ isn’t the only thing wrong with our offense. We have one of the worst open shooters in the league jacking up 25% of his shots playing the PF spot, when he needs to be working on his post offense almost exclusively.
JJ’s main problem is that he needs to think quicker and shoot the damn ball. Not dribble until the Spalding label fades off of it. But he’s definitely failed in the playoffs. Trade him for some other guy who may can perform better, or trade him for multiple assets.
That’s been my stance.
This team is not better with JJ gone, and no one to adequately replace him. I mean, unless everyone is behind the John Jenkins draft pick now, and feel he can be a budding young star in the league?
Most of you have no plan to replace JJ, other than to simply get him out of here. Championship teams aren’t built like that. Ferry probably has a decent plan in place though. We’ll see.
Romper Stomper 79
July 1st, 2012
1:32 am
Chipper for Vice -President!
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
July 1st, 2012
1:34 am
*YAWN*
Echevarria
July 1st, 2012
1:35 am
Northcyde are you serious!? We wouldn’t be better without Joe Johnson? His ball-stopping dribbling is what kills our flow.
Now, don’t think I’m taking away from him as a basketball player by saying that. He doesn’t fit the group of players we have. Joe would play very well in NJ with a great PG to set him up in DWill. He just isn’t the face of a franchise and a go to guy. He’ll be a great Pippen to somebody. That’s the problem in Atlanta, we tried to make him Jordan. Our team is full of Pippens and no Jordan’s to lead it.
Although, I could argue that Horford (under the team-building type of Ferry) could be our Jordan-esque player, but I would equate Horford more to our Duncan since Ferry came from SA and Duncan is the greatest PF of all-time and a 5 time champion. I think Horford, on a team similarly constructed to the Spurs, could follow a career trajectory of Tim Duncan. he’s got the skills and work ethic.
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
July 1st, 2012
1:35 am
Let’s replace Joe with Marvin
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:36 am
P.J.Openhiemer
July 1st, 2012
1:24 am
Horford guards Lebron LMAO
Al cant protect the rim and doesnt want to. tiny nate robinson and tony parker showcase over Al and you expect Al to guard Lebron?
Its thought like that the lead the hawks to the lottery
******************
Silly comment.
If Lebron is going to play more PF, Horford would have to guard him. But that means that Lebron will have to guard Horford. We’ll see if Lebron can play post defense and possibly get in foul trouble. Or better yet, throw a bigger lineup at him with Zaza and Gasol, and force Lebron to guard Gasol.
If the Heat plan to play Lebron at the 4, they’ll see more zone than ever. Teams won’t look to do like the Thunder did, and try to play them head up. You throw zones at them and force them to shoot over top of it. Force D-Wade to make a mid-range jumper.
P.J.Openhiemer
July 1st, 2012
1:36 am
Josh is a power forward / small forward and so that trade will never happen and its stupid to waste ink thinking it would.
Al is a center/(want to be) powerforward as is Gasol. The only problem is noboody is going to give up a Gasol for a Al horford. In fact you cant get a Lopez for AL. You cannot get an impact player for Al so why would we want to build around a player who clearly doesnt have much value? That logic keeps us stuck in mediocrity.
Trading Josh for Gasol is weak and stupid and why Sund ultimately got fired, for idiotic thoughts. I keep up and coming PF/SF at 26 and pass on that trade for Center Gasol at 31. Now if you can get both players on the same team…. Put Josh and Gasol on your front line then you have upgraded.
Josh and Gasol > Al and GasoL
Im Glad Danny Ferry is not as stupid as these bloggers.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:36 am
“Gasol is the better offensive player. Josh is the better defensive player. It depends on whether a person believes who is the better all around player. What player will fit the team better chemistry wise.”
I have actually conceded on multiple occasions that as individual players, Gasol is probably slightly better than Josh. That still doesn’t defeat my point or prove yours. You are essentially saying one of two things:
1) that replacing Josh with Gasol will have a large enough positive impact on this team to raise this team’s ceiling by two playoff rounds. Gasol has done nothing to indicate he can have that kind of impact, even if we accept for the purpose of this argument that he is a better individual player.
Or
2) that you don’t particularly care about winning a title and you just want some good player to replace Josh and maintain the status quo of being a pretty good winning team that has no chance of being a serious contender.
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
July 1st, 2012
1:36 am
Staring Lineup
Teague-Marvin-Smoove-Horford-Zaza
362437
July 1st, 2012
1:37 am
DO9562
richy
July 1st, 2012
1:39 am
The difference between Josh and Gasol offensively. Gasol makes the mid range jumper, smith bricks it. Smith is going to walk at the end of the season anyway. Try to get at least something for him right?
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
1:40 am
Lebron vs. Horford
Oh the Humanity!!!!!
Lebron 45 Horford 17 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:41 am
LOL @ JJ kills our flow . . . like we have a flow to begin with.
Our “flow” is to pass the ball to an open man for a jumpshot, regardless if he can shoot it or not.
Once again, I can post stats in which I can prove that JJ in Isolation made a higher percentage of shots than a lot of these “flow” guys when they got wide open spot up shots. But stats are po-po’d around here when it proves a point.
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
1:43 am
Joe appears to have lost a step, perhaps two?
Drizzy
July 1st, 2012
1:44 am
The athleticism and defense of Javale McGee attracts me, offer this guy a contract and lets see what Denver does..
Poor Richard
July 1st, 2012
1:46 am
Actually Josh shot the mid range very well and carried this team this year. Its the 3 ball that he struggles with…..
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:47 am
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
1:36 am
“Gasol is the better offensive player. Josh is the better defensive player. It depends on whether a person believes who is the better all around player. What player will fit the team better chemistry wise.”
I have actually conceded on multiple occasions that as individual players, Gasol is probably slightly better than Josh. That still doesn’t defeat my point or prove yours. You are essentially saying one of two things:
1) that replacing Josh with Gasol will have a large enough positive impact on this team to raise this team’s ceiling by two playoff rounds. Gasol has done nothing to indicate he can have that kind of impact, even if we accept for the purpose of this argument that he is a better individual player.
Or
2) that you don’t particularly care about winning a title and you just want some good player to replace Josh and maintain the status quo of being a pretty good winning team that has no chance of being a serious contender.
**************
1) I’m saying that because Gasol plays more like a PF, that it will give the team as a whole to step up to that next level. Teague will get the ball after a defensive rebound is made. Gasol will go to the post and take 25% of his shots via post ups. Horford will finally get to play PF the vast majority of the time, possibly raising his level of play. And JJ’s efficiency may increase because we have better offensive weapons surrounding him. Instead of ISO-everything, he will be able to play more freer.
2) I firmly believe that Gasol can and will elevate us into a serious contender because of all of the things I mentioned in 1). And Gasol does not have to be the best player on the team for that to happen. He simply has to be more efficient than the guy he replaced, and still be the good ( but not great ) all around player on defense that he already is. It is you who does not believe that. We’ll never know who is right because the trade will never happen.
362439
July 1st, 2012
1:48 am
enter your comments here;
http://makeitrain.tv/
Road Rage
July 1st, 2012
1:49 am
Id love to have JaVale here but that means we keep Josh, again
Josh and JaVale > Al and JaVale
Drizzy
July 1st, 2012
1:51 am
@Worldwide Clyde, what a weak starting lineup!!
362439
July 1st, 2012
1:52 am
Al, Camel, and JaVale > JSmoove and JaVale’s Mom
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
1:53 am
Poor Richard
July 1st, 2012
1:46 am
Actually Josh shot the mid range very well and carried this team this year. Its the 3 ball that he struggles with….
***********************
Josh shot 37% on shots 16 – 23 feet during the regular season, which is damn good for him . . . but the league average for everybody else.
On total jumpshots, he shot just under 33%
And when over 50% of your shots are jumpers, and you are the PF on the team, that is not good. If he continues to play like that, yeah, trade JJ because we’re not going to win anything anyway. But trade JJ for assets who can possibly make jumpers and/or rebound Josh’s misses.
Josh Smith Jumpshooting
362439
July 1st, 2012
1:53 am
Clyde hit his head against that Brazilian rack…
HawkKingBibby
July 1st, 2012
1:53 am
Joe and Marvin for Gasol and World Peace. We get a decent center with 2 years less than JJ contract wise and Peace guards Lebron.
362440
July 1st, 2012
1:55 am
Hey Clyde it’s your patriotic duty to hit your head against home grown racks….
prison mike
July 1st, 2012
1:57 am
“With no deal is close to completion, sources say the teams are discussing trade on multiple fronts.”
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/221919/Nets_Hawks_Discussing_Joe_Johnson_Trade
Have to revise what I said earlier. Since Crook is so much under the cap, they could essentially take Joe without trading anyone.
The nets are basically offering cap space for Joe and Ferry would probably like Brooks. Since joe plays heavy minutes and an iron man, they would only need one of Brooks or Morrow.
If they keep their assets, they could offer Lopez, Brooks/Morrow, future picks for Dwight and still get their big 3.
Payaso
July 1st, 2012
1:58 am
“Gasol plays more like a PF, that it will give the team as a whole to step up to that next level. Teague will get the ball after a defensive rebound is made. Gasol will go to the post and take 25% of his shots via post ups. Horford will finally get to play PF the vast majority of the time, possibly raising his level of play”
Gasol Plays like a center.
Most of your logic is based on hope that a player will perform differently>
Teague will get the ball more? LIke that going to make the hawks better. Teague is no that Good. sorry to burst your bubble. Teague is a border line starter/bench player.
“Horford will finally get to play PF the vast majority of the time, possibly raising his level of play”
Al Horford has played plenty of power forward and there was nothing to suggest this guy is any better a power forward as he is a center. Hes awkward, uncoordinated, and mechanical and and has very limited offensive skills.
Your thinking or logic is not sound but base on favorite players Ouija board GM strategy.
” If a frog, had a glass ass…. every time he jumped…. he’d break it”
HawkKingBibby
July 1st, 2012
2:01 am
Were not getting a 24 year old 7ft center who avr 20 ppg and 8 rpg for Joe Johnson.
So Freakin What?
July 1st, 2012
2:02 am
JSmoove and JaVale’s Mom > Al, Camel, and JaVale
Sugar Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:04 am
We should trade Al horford and Jeff teague if we expect to improve as a team.
Sugar Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:09 am
Uh, people, we’re trying to win the NBA championship not the And 1 tour.
BLOW IT UP AND SHIP EM ALL OUT! Everyone miust go. All I’d want are picks and expiring deals.
Yall said you want to rebuild right? Josh should be the next one on his way out.
BYE.
northcyde
July 1st, 2012
2:12 am
This will be my last post of the night. I didn’t see this one earlier
*********************
MakingNoSense
July 1st, 2012
12:35 am
@Northcyde.. Dude, you can’t be a businessman. We only got 6 players under contract and those six players already put us about 4 million over the salary cap. So your solution is to trade away a 26 year josh smith for a 31 year Pau Gasol, who makes 6 million dollars more than Josh. So now you would be roughly 10 million dollars over the salary cap with only 6 players signed. Again, tell us how you would fill out your roster under this circumstance.
****************
Well first off, we can’t complete any deal for Gasol involving Josh, unless we add another player to the deal. And the only players we could add are Marvin or Zaza. And since everybody hates Marvin, let’s add him.
Hawks payroll
JJ – 19.75 mill
Gasol – 19 mill
Horford – 12 mill
Zaza – 5.25 mill
Teague – 2.4 mill
Jenkins ( 1st round pick ) – 1 mill
Mike Scott ( 2nd round pick ) . . . 500K
Total: 60 million for 7 players
Luxury Tax will be somewhere close to last year. Let’s say it goes up just a tick to 70.5 mill.
Hawks would then have 10.5 mill to work with to sign 6 more players
Let’s say the Hawks “splurge” and sign a decent free agent for 3 million. I won’t name a name, but it could be anybody. And let’s say that Ferry gets “really aggressive” and signs a vet guy for the bi-annual exception of 1.9 mill
- Vet Free agent ( 3 million )
- Vet Free agent ( 1.9 million )
Current Hawks Payroll: 64.9 million for 9 players . . . need 4 more players
Hawks were actually somewhat successful signing guys for the pro rated vet minimum of 854K. So let’s say we sign 3 players at that price.
854K * 3 = 2.56 million ( round up to 2.6 mill )
67.5 mill for 12 players. Still a full 3 million under the Luxury Tax
Heck, might as well fill out the roster with one or two of the Summer league standouts. Let’s take 2 of them at 500K
68.5 mill for 14 players . . . still 2 mill under the Luxury Tax.
That’s how you do business my man. You trade off 21+ million worth of contracts in Smith and Marvin, and take back Gasol’s 19 milliion, and save 2 mill. Fill out the rest of the team, and still have that 2 million to spare IF someone gets hurt and we need to add someone ( like we did with Dampier in midseason ).
Class is over.
Good night.
Sugar Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:12 am
OK that troll Sautee is here stealing my blog name. Not my post people
July 1st, 2012
2:09 am
Grandad
July 1st, 2012
2:13 am
Nets have already re-signed Farmar;
it is presumed he will be a part of any impending deal.
Reasoning – is why he accepted deal so quickly,
plus he signed for more than mkt value.
ryan
July 1st, 2012
2:15 am
I think Ferry sees the obvious- even with JJ this team can’t pass Miami or Boston and the Hawks will have more flexibility in a strong 2013 FA market
Think about 2012-2013 lets say the Hawks stay intact with a core of JJ, Josh and Horford
Miami adds Ray Allen to bolster their bench, upgrade over Mike Miller
Boston adds OJ Mayo to replace Allen or backup Bradley and they have Jeff Green who missed last season (and if Sullinger is healthy they just got the steal of the draft)
There is no scenario in which the Hawks can hang with those two teams
BullWinkle
July 1st, 2012
2:16 am
Gasol – 19 mill
How to make the Hawks a weaker team and get back to the lottery fast??
Horford
Zaza
Teague
Jenkins ( 1st round pick )
Mike Scot
BullWinkle
July 1st, 2012
2:17 am
How to make the Hawks a weaker team and get back to the lottery fast??
Gasol – 19 mill
Horford
Zaza
Teague
Jenkins ( 1st round pick )
Mike Scot
Repost
July 1st, 2012
2:18 am
How to make the Hawks a weaker team and get back to the lottery fast??
Gasol
Horford
Zaza
Teague
Jenkins ( 1st round pick )
Mike Scot
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
2:19 am
Me and my boyfriend Josh Smith are going out tonight. Yall have fun.
Smooches!
IMakeSense
July 1st, 2012
2:20 am
@northcyde you stated ” But stats are po-po’d around here when it proves a point”
So northcyde, why do you keep ignoring the most important stat….the Hawks roster salary. We only have 6 players under contract and those six contracts already put the Hawks over the salary cap. I seriously doubt the 3 exceptions the Hawks can use will be enough to bring in six players. AND I seriously doubt your solution of bringing in Gasol for Josh Smith is a viable solution. I’m willing to bet the 6million addition in yearly salary and no addition in bodies is the main reason the trade hasn’t been done.
I understand the Hawks are not going to get better talent wise by bringing back bench players for JJ, but unless the Hawks shed some contracts, they can’t sign any long term contracts (Ivan Johnson).
And oh yea, you mention the Rashard Lewis trade, but you didn’t mention that Rashard Lewis only had 20-something million left on his contract (which NO only paid 14 million to buyout). JJ has roughly 90 million on his contract. Therefore JJ and Rashard Lewis is not comparing apples to apples. Again you stated: ” But stats are po-po’d around here when it proves a point”
Fanmale
July 1st, 2012
2:32 am
Blow this thing up Ferry! Trade Joe and Josh and I am happy! I like both players but i realize that the team is not going anywhere with this current lineup. Trade Joe for Lopez and Brooks. Keep Josh for one more year. Sign your draft picks. let Hienricch go. Let McGrady go. Keep Ivan and Pargo. Dump Collins and trade Marvin for something, not sure what. Atleast you can trot out a line up of teague, brooks, josh, hartford, lopez. major back ups are za za, pargo, ivan, willie green, jenkins, scott. I would be happy with that team and you will still have some cap money to play with when you get rid of Joe and marvins contracts.
Fanmale
July 1st, 2012
2:33 am
I forgot, tell drew, thanks but no thanks and bring in J Sloan NOW
prison mike
July 1st, 2012
2:40 am
“Well first off, we can’t complete any deal for Gasol involving Josh, unless we add another player to the deal. And the only players we could add are Marvin or Zaza. And since everybody hates Marvin, let’s add him.”
This guy is a terrible jj homer. First above everything. JS and Duck combine to make 21.5 including his trade kicker which adds roughly 3 million which comes to 24.5 mill. Gasol makes 19 so the lakers will want to send some salary back *cough* mcroberts.
JJ – 19.8
PG – 19
AL – 12
Zaza – 5.2
Mcroberts (no better than Ivan mind you) – 3
JT – 2.4
John – 1
Scott – .5
63 million for 8 players when you have to sign atleast 5 more. Zaza and Teague are due significant raises the following year. Essentially we have a one year window for a semi chance at a finals appearance. What is the difference between rebuilding now and a year from now???
“Class is over.”
How dare you. No self respecting GM will put all their eggs in the basket for one potentially injury filled season. You do understand Ferry from his own mouth wants a long term team not one that will implode very quickly.
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
2:44 am
“As much as I like Anthony Morrow, I think he is redundant since we drafted JJ2.”
Anthony Morrow is one of the best shooters in the NBA. JJ2 hasn’t proven that he can get his shot off at the NBA level.
“I’m trying to get real assets for that dude, if a decision to trade JJ is made.”
Who says we’re not getting draft picks in addition to expiring contracts? Also, I know Gasol is a player. He was overshadowed by Bynum’s breakout season and took the fall for Kobe, who gets less efficient by the minute. I’ve already posted that I would take Gasol for Josh if we can’t get anything better (like a lottery pick) because Gasol could be flipped for assets.
Were you saying in the last blog that the Joe to Brooklyn rumor had been put to rest? Because I can’t find that anywhere. Deron wants to have his contract situation resolved in the next few days so that he can commit to play in the Olympics. Dwight’s situation is not going to be resolved that quickly, but if the Nets can get JJ, at least Deron knows that he’s got another all star to play with.
Brook Lopez would have to be the centerpiece of any trade with Orlando. Problem is, he’s not under contract. He’s an RFA, so he would have to agree to any sign-and-trade. Any time he wants to, Lopez can say “I will not agree to a sign-and-trade to Orlando” and that potential deal is nixed. Lopez is free to talk to other teams and sign an offer sheet which Brooklyn must then match. And I’m not sure if they can even immediately trade him once the offer is matched.
As far as the possibility of JJ to the Nets being believable, I hope you know that Ferry and Nets GM Billy King played together at Duke and Ferry’s dad Bob (former St. Louis Hawks first round draft pick and former Bullets GM) is a scout employed by the Brooklyn Nets.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
2:48 am
One last thing before I call it a night:
“My problem with the whole deal, is that people would have a fit if we just gave Josh Smith away for nothing ( or a bunch of expiring contracts ). That doesn’t help the Hawks, and it doesn’t put fans in the seats. And the same thing applies with JJ. What was the use of acquiring all of this talent, if we couldn’t flip it when we felt they couldn’t progress any longer.”
We would have a fit if Josh was traded for nothing because Josh has a reasonable contract that is attractive to potential trade partners. Joe, on the other hand, has the worst contract in the league.
You keep approaching this from the point of view of how good these players are on the court. That is only one component of their value to the team. The other component is the opportunity cost of the contract being on the books. The opportunity cost of holding on to Joe is that the nearly $20 million per year he will eat up for the next four years could otherwise be spent on players who can almost certainly match or outperform what he brings to the table. The opportunity cost of Josh isn’t nearly as high, because the chances of finding a player who contributes at Josh’s level for the price he is paid is much lower.
And in turn, this affects their trade value. Josh is likely to bring back more in a trade than Joe is, because Josh provides more for the cost than Joe does and provides more financial flexibility to build around than Joe.
One of my favorite NBA articles every year is Bill Simmons’ NBA Trade Value column. I don’t agree with a lot of his player assessments but he breaks the concept of trade value down in really simple (maybe overly simple) terms:
NBA TRADE VALUE RULES
1. Salaries matter. Would you rather pay Kyrie Irving $5.1 million a year or Tony Parker $12.5 million?
2. Age matters. Would you rather have Dirk Nowitzki for the next five seasons or Blake Griffin for the next 15?
3. Pretend the league passed the following rule: For 24 hours, any player can be traded without cap ramifications but with luxury-tax and next-day-cap ramifications. If Team A tells Team B, “We’ll trade you Player X for Player Y,” would Team B make the deal?
4. Concentrate on degrees. I don’t think the Bulls or Heat would make a Wade-Rose swap, but Miami would at least say, “Rose’s available?” while Chicago would say, “There’s no way we’re trading Derrick for someone seven years older.” That counts in the big scheme of things.
If you plug Joe into that list of criteria, it’s real simple. I’d rather pay about 15 SGs in the league their current salary than Joe his $19 million per year and I’d rather have at least 10 SGs in the league at their current age than Joe at 30+. Can’t say the same about Josh at his current deal.
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
3:10 am
Echevarria I’d love to get Royce White, don’t want Scola.
“I could argue that Horford could be our Jordan-esque player.”
You could, but that would be roughly the equivalent of JC2 saying he could be as good as Jordan.
“Were not getting a 24 year old 7ft center who avr 20 ppg and 8 rpg for Joe Johnson.”
This is probably true. NJ’s plan if they trade for JJ most likely is to then match any offer sheet for Lopez so that they have a front court player to go with the best back court in the NBA outside of OKC.
“Boston adds OJ Mayo to replace Allen or backup Bradley and they have Jeff Green who missed last season (and if Sullinger is healthy they just got the steal of the draft)”
Yeah, imagine Boston next year with Bradley and Green healthy if they got O.J. Mayo and signed Ivan Johnson to a $2m a season 3-year contract with team options after each year. That team would brutalize anything the Hawks could put on the floor.
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
3:44 am
Something I wrote in April:
“The New York Post further claimed that Howard, despite an initial short list that included the Lakers, was adamant that he wanted to land with the Nets. By opting in for the final year of his contract, Howard may have ensured that he ends up with neither team. The Lakers are unlikely to part with Andrew Bynum if Howard has decided he doesn’t want to play for them. And by opting in for the final year of his contract, Howard has provided the Magic with additional leverage to seek a better offer than what the Nets or Mavericks could assemble.”
http://www.hoopinionblog.com/2012/04/hawks-could-be-back-in-hunt-for-dwight.html
Jae Evolution
July 1st, 2012
4:44 am
Well my blog pitches for Asik are officially over, Rockets offering him something around 8 million per year, jeez. At least Bulls get weaker now.
Ra'mon
July 1st, 2012
5:00 am
Najeh, I think what Northcyde is missing is that you believe (and I as well) that if P. Gasol, Josh, Al, Or Joe is the best player on your team, you’re not competing for an ECF round (although I feel Josh is more capable than either of them of going to that plateau as the leader of the team). And you’re saying if neither of those 4 can lead a team that far, why not be open to not having either of those four on the team. I haven’t looked. But I’m pretty sure that Gasol and Joe separately, make more than the entire Denver second unit combined. So the difference between having Joe and Gasol is having the flexibility of having 4-5 highly productive players on your bench who can enter the game at anytime. At least with THAT option, those productive players on moderate contract can be traded for reasonable value. For instance, if you add Gasol to this lineup without trading Joe as well, you have close to $40 million invested in two players who aren’t even ALL NBA status players. Even Lebron and Wade salary numbers don’t add up that high. In this new CBA era, you can get 4-5 very high productive players in the place of Joe and Gasol to go with Al or Josh and Teague. Even if you traded Joe for a trade exception. You’re now able to add players like Andre Miller, Mayo, and Asik to a line up in place of Joe’s salary alone. If you’re drowning in a lake, you don’t get mad if the first person to come rescue you is in a row boat. You take your life saver and feel fortunate. If you’re in a bad salary situation with a contract, and have reached your max with that player’s production (declining production). If someone comes along with a way to do away with that contract without you taking on another bad contract, you take that deal all day. Its just like saying, if Joe didn’t get the max deal, he wouldn’t have signed here. So you got two years out of Joe, and got rid of him before his contract REALLY starts to hinder the team.
AG
July 1st, 2012
6:44 am
Joe stepped up several games last season – but if we remember,the Hawks were 4-2 without Joe – with wins over OKC, Indy and Orlanda. One loss was a 3pt loss in Miami.
Josh and Joe each averaged 18.8 ppg (career high for Josh). Yet Josh had 30 double- doubles and was in the top 20 in three categories. By drafting s SG – JJ is now expendable. Trade him to free up $$
Just Joe
July 1st, 2012
6:55 am
I think the Joe salary dump is all but done. I think it’s Farmar (backup PG, hit 44% of his 3’s last year), Morrow (career 42% 3pt shooter), and Petro. This gives the Hawks $12M in expiring contract and roughly a $7.5M trade exception.
AG
July 1st, 2012
7:11 am
Joe had some great moments in ATL – and it will be hard to replace him on some nights (Utah game, etc) – but most nights he can be replaced. If this deal is made, would love to resign JC.
will
July 1st, 2012
7:45 am
B. Knight, as hawks gm, did a very good job, his core players has made the playoffs the last several yrs, that does not always happen. The warriors, nets, raptors and even the knicks, clippers, have been and has been trying to put together winning playoff bb teams for many many yrs.
B. Knight, was not the hawks problem. He was very successful as gm.
The problem is when hawks ownership and gm R. Sund, made the biggest mistake in sports history by signing an average bb player to the largest nba contract in history, 124 million dollars.
Dumb, dumb, dumb move!!!!!!!!
dap01
July 1st, 2012
7:47 am
Whether the Hawks blow it up or keep trying with the “core” (what a joke of a term), it is nice to know that Ferry is in charge instead of Sund.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
7:59 am
FTPB,
Northcyde,
Dump JJ, then offer another extreme MAX deal to Josh Smith? Is that the deal people want? Wouldn’t that be repeating the same mistake twice?.
I think Josh can be had for less than an extreme MAX deal. But even so, Smith would be 27 years old if he signs that deal next year, whereas JJ was 29 when he signed his.
Also, at that time, JJ had reached his plateau (how many articles have we seen about players like JJ declining after age 30), whereas there is still more room for Josh to improve (especially with better coaching). Also, I think Josh would do a better job of actually recruiting a player to come here, whereas JJ has been quiet as a church mouse (despite what his agent said).
Therefore, I don’t think it would be the same mistake.
That being said, I don’t want to trade JJ for scraps. Hopefully we can get some combination of trade exceptions, draft picks, and serviceable players. But if we can’t find a good deal for him, I am open to Josh and Marvin for Gasol. Would that be a lateral move? Maybe. But I am willing to spend at least one year to find out for sure.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
8:02 am
Najeh, Belkin,
The initial contract he received was a great contract. The Hawks’ major screw up was not bringing Joe here — it was failing to draft CP3 to team with Joe in the back court..
The Hawks second major screw up was giving him 6 years, $124 mil.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
8:04 am
There are tons of rumors on Hoopshype about who is interested in who. But there is not one mention of the Hawks being interested in anybody. Do the Hawks even know who they are interested in?
And I’m surprised the Hawks didn’t give Ivan the QO of $970k. If somebody offered him more than that, Hawks could have declined to match. And if we end up keeping him at that salary, that would be very good value (imo).
Ray
July 1st, 2012
8:13 am
@ O’Brien
Give it some time I’m just thankful there is actually something going on this summer. You know.
Like Joe Johnson actually might be traded Marvin Williams could be amnestied.
Under Rick Sund and BK this stuff didn’t really happen.
As for the trade of JJ to NETS GOOD! Let him be their problem even if we get back scraps like Lopez and Brooks fine it’s better than being so extremely cash strapped this is what Danny Ferry sees.
He now sees why we weren’t able to advance pretty much anywhere.
Last year’s bench was good, but once you look back at it it wasn’t that much better than the previous 2 years. If it were we’d have gotten past Round 1 and remember this was a Boston Celtics team missing two good players plus Paul Pierce was a bit shaky.
Yes I know we missed two of ours Horford and Zaza, but still Bradley plus Green and then everyone else Celtics had a stronger bench.
Now I hope he has Larry Drew on a short leash because any screw-up means he’s fired. Cause when names like Phil Jackson and Jerry Sloan are floating around out there those are the guys I want to see as HC you know.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
8:20 am
@ O’Brien
Another thing about Ivan don’t get me wrong he’s the kind of player I’d love to keep that can get up in someone’s face, but if Mike Scott is also like him like many others have said keeping him would be redundant.
It’s a lot of players out there for us if we make the trade the one guy I’d like to bring back home is Marshon Brooks even Brook Lopez that at least makes it better for us
Teague, Brooks, Smith, Horford, Lopez(barring injury). That’s a lineup I can live with for awhile it depends on what happens to both Brooks or Lopez. If Brooks becomes very good which that one time we played against the Nets earlier this year, and he went off mannnnnn. I’d keep him on board for awhile. We need a David West type player though someone who will bang down low with Zaza on the backup unit.
Really?
July 1st, 2012
8:36 am
To all those who want to ‘blow it up’…
We’ve done that, that’s how we got here.
When last done we won 13 games that year, 26 the next, not that many more the following year.
Are you really ready for that … again????
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
8:36 am
It is being reported that Portland offered a max deal to Hibbert. I don’t know what it is, but as a Center, I’m sure he will be overpaid. Unfortunately, that’s their market value these days.
Meanwhile, Jamal has plenty of suitors.
morehouse man
July 1st, 2012
8:43 am
everybody seems to forget that was a better team when joe was hurt.the had a good ball movement offense.when joe came back,the offense tanked.al is a good center because he is faster and quicker than other centers. at power forward,he would be average at best.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
8:44 am
@ O’Brien
Their probably going that route cause they have no Center Aldridge is a Power Forward more so than Center.
I doubt Roy Hibbert goes he like Indy probably feels as though they got what it takes to make ECF next season if they finally get a superstar.
What makes it so much worse about the Indy situation the only thing we needed was a Center all they need is a legit All-star Danny Granger is not that he’s not Batman he’s a Robin.
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
8:45 am
Don’t trade Joe for scraps…..
Allstar SG/SF are the hardest positions in the NBA to fill and we have the 3rd best SG and are willing to trade him for scraps… I can’t see it. Their has to be a 3rd team involved or Ferry in trying to make his players uncomfortable.
Joe:
Is our best offensive players and MOST IMPORTANT.
He is the only one that constantly get doubled teamed and can create his own shot.
He is our best defender and top 5 wing defender.
There is NOOOO part of his game where he would be left WIDE OPEN.
He is seldom injured.
Is he overpaid, maybe….but 70% of the NBA is overpaid. Travis Outlaw, Josh Childress make 7mil a year.
Some team is about to injury prone Eric Gordon MAX money(14-15mil a year) and the future Marvin Williams(Nicholas Batum) 14-15mil.
We haven’t traded Josh because none of the offers were good enough, no way are we trading Joe for Marshon Brooks.
AG
July 1st, 2012
8:47 am
O’Brien- Josh and Marvin for Gasol is turrible. First, two players (not even top 10 players in the NBA)
Trading Joe and freeing up cap space to sign other players is a much better option than trading your best player
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
8:49 am
Who said Brook Lopez is a scrub ?
Lopez for Joe make that trade in a heart beat.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
brigadierjerry
July 1st, 2012
9:01 am
Saw this posted on another blog:
If things don’t work out with Brooklyn…..
If Nash signs with the Raptors……….
***Scenario 1***
Calderon and Kleiza (or Bayless) for Joe
-Simple salary dumb and Ferry can sign free agents in 2013 (build the team he wants)
***Scenario 2***
Hawks get – Dwight and Turk
Raptors get – Joe
Magic get – Horford, Kleiza, and Calderon
-Hawks get Dwight / Rap get Joe and Nash / Magic get Horford and exp contact for Turk
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
9:03 am
Josh might want stay ?
Danny must find out ASAP what on Josh mind and staying with Hawks.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:03 am
Lopez is the next Yao Ming… Won’t stay healthy….Healthy has a financial value..
I like Marshon Brook.
I would like to see James Harden as the number one option…being guarded by the best wing defender and doubled every time he gets the ball..
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:07 am
@ Rufus
You want to know why Joe Johnson is constantly double teamed it’s not cause he’s actually that good it’s because that’s the way to stop him Iso-Joeing(not a word but still). Cause dude is a horrible passer out of the double team, and it takes away the part of his game that kills most opposing teams.
Also 3rd best SG man a lot of people might debate that one especially when you consider Kevin Martin, Eric Gordon, James Harden, and a few others.
Here’s the other problem with 3rd best SG
Kobe>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wade>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Joe Johnson way back in the back there little tiny dot can’t miss him.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
9:09 am
Joe for Lopez and Morrow,
Make this trade ASAP.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
9:11 am
Nets are not trading Marshon Brooks.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
9:13 am
Teague, Morrow, Josh, Horford, Lopez
Pargo, Jenkin, Marvin, Ivan, Zaza
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:16 am
I find it funny that people jump on Al Horford and Smith or even Teague.
Here’s the thing
#1 before Teague started this season we had to deal with a declining Mike Bibby and Kirk Hinrich who was not the same since leaving Chi-town.
Teague may not be the best PG, but he’s developing quickly at one point dude was in the race for awhile for MIP for this season. Plus not only that once he stepped in most of our problems at PG were solved for the time being he’s not the best guy at PG ever, but for us right now he’s the best we got and I can deal with that.
Horford was injured 2/3 of the season and you want to jump on him???? You say he’s soft didn’t see that in the playoffs at all honestly the only ones that were soft in the playoffs were Marvin, Joe, and Willie Green, plus Kirk Hinrich. You can’t call a person soft just cause they didn’t play 2/3 of the season I got onto Horford for disappearing last season, but this season early on he was doing great for us.
In fact with a Healthy Horford we advance past Boston in Round 1 also if we have a healthy Zaza when Horford came back too early he wasn’t in the flow of things that’s not his fault you try doing something after going down with a major injury like that.
Last Josh Smith there isn’t much to say except dude carried this team most of the season especially after Horford went down, and I guess people forget that Heat game when Joe Johnson was out Josh played his heart out I mean what more do you want from him he had virtually no help and yet we only lose by like 3 pts that I remember COME THE F ON MAN!
Now you guys talking about trading him COME ON MAN y’all living in denial like seriously it’s kind of bad too.
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:19 am
Ray,
None of those players defend like Joe…. and defense matters…You are a fan Josh, so I know you understand that.
I watched WADE the #2 option on his team get shut down by Boston… Do you think he would do better on our team against them.
If Joe is that far behind Wade, then the rest>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are that far behind him.
This talk about JJ like he is some scrub is CRAZY!!!
Melvin
July 1st, 2012
9:21 am
The offered Hibbert the max. I think the Blazers are trying to make Indy over spend for Hibbert. As much as I like Hibbert, he’s not a max player. If they give Hibbert the max, that would put a serious dent in Indy cap flexibility going forward. Remember the salary cap penalties will increase tremendously after next season. I think we will see a lot of teams dumping players to stay below the luxury tax. Which is why I don’t mind seeing Joe traded for expiring contracts, picks or TPE. Having cap space to build a team and stay under the luxury tax will be very important after the 2012-13 season.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:21 am
PF and SG are the two easiest positions to get back
1) Center
2) Point Guard(legit)
3) Small forward
4) SG
5) PF
Every team around the league has a PF like seriously
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
9:22 am
Trading Joe 90mill contract and also in return a expiring contract in Morrow with true center Brook Lopez is a win win for the Hawks.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:25 am
@ Rufus1
Wade vs. Joe on defense yes I understand that, but on offense Wade is light years away from Joe Johnson.
Joe isn’t a scrub I’m just saying compared to Wade and Kobe that Joe is nowhere near their league, and that the people that are behind Joe aren’t too far behind.
James Harden for example and Eric Gordon if both are who people think they are their not that far behind Joe at all.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:26 am
Well if we keep Horford bringing in someone like Lopez means Josh moves SF no matter what cause Lopez again barring injury is a starter in this league he’s not going to sit behind Horford especially being much taller.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:29 am
MIP means most improved player, but that’s okay instead you guys want to trade for Deron Coach Killer Williams okay.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
9:30 am
Rufus 1 – No one say Joe is a scrub, matter of fact Joe is a top 5 SG in the NBA, its the money he make.
Not this season but next the CB kick in with Luxary tax.
So Teams has to be carefull specially the Hawks.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:33 am
I will give you center
Paul, Nash, Rondo, Lowry, DWill, Parker, Westbrook, Lawson, Holliday, Irving, Dragic, Nelson, Teague, Lin, Kidd, Rubio, Conley, Miller, Wall, Jennings, Chalmers, Rose and Curry.
Bosh, Amare, Josh, AL, Pau, Aldridge, Love, Griffin, Dirk, Nene, Scola, Lee, Milsap, Bass, Ibaka and KG ……………………………… Smoking NBA Knowledge, get some
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:37 am
Ray,
Name the Legit SG in the league.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:38 am
@ Rufus
The reason I said PG is tough is because it took awhile to get some of those PG’s for a lot of teams.
Plus of all those Teague, Lin, Rubio, Wall, Jennings, Curry the jury is still out on them why? because Teague, Lin this was technically their first full years. Wall, Jennings, and Curry took backwards steps. Add Irving to that as well as a wait and see cause he’s only been here one year.
As for Kidd, Nash, and Miller while still good on the way out sooner or later.
Chalmers and Nelson even Dragic shouldn’t be on that list
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:39 am
“Smoking NBA Knowledge, get some” That is for the person that thinks I am smoking.
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:39 am
“Smoking NBA Knowledge, get some” That is for the person that thinks I am smoking.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:40 am
@ Rufus
When did I say anything about a legit SG????????
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:41 am
@ Danny Dan
Do you really think Horford would agree with coming off the bench? Seriously I need to hear this answer.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:45 am
If Lopez, Horford, and Smith are here you have no choice, but to have Smith to move to SF guys Horford is not coming off that bench. I mean he’s not Marvin for crying out loud.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:50 am
@ Danny Dan
Look my man Danny Ferry is looking for cap room, and Marvin and Joe are the two easiest candidates seeing as one is overpa………………well excuse both are overpaid, but one is extremely overpaid and the other while overpaid doesn’t produce stats worthy of even a Sixth Man role.
Horford isn’t overpaid by the slighest that’s about where he should be in that range.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:52 am
@ Danny Dan
Everyone here realizes that Horford isn’t Josh, but both have unique skills that make them both good to have on the roster. Horford got a post up game and mid range shot while on the flip side Josh is more athletic and can cut to the rim at any time.
Both play great defense no matter what you say. It’s better to have them to be without either one that’s all I’m saying.
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:53 am
There is a player that is top 5 at their position, that doesn’t get top or MAX money in any league.
PPL get caught up in the money he makes and lose prospective how good he is… That is how my friend left his wife for the office slut…. Complaining about his wife demanded too much but now he think she was worth it.. but she is gone.
Until I know who will replace Joe, I will be against this trade… But I will trust Ferry.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
9:54 am
Danny okay we don’t know how Horford ranks because since being here he’s been playing Center like the entire time so saying he could be 15-30 you’re only assuming cause again he hasn’t play much anything else besides Center even though this past season we had like 4 behind him he still played C.
Dude could probably be a Top 3 PF for all we know he don’t have the frame size to be a Center especially against bigger ones like Perkins, Hibbert, Howard etc.
Rufus1
July 1st, 2012
9:56 am
Ray,
My mistake if I attributed that statement to you.
brigadierjerry
July 1st, 2012
10:07 am
http://hoopshype.com/salaries.htm
Fundamentals
July 1st, 2012
10:24 am
Josh needs to work on a very short mid-range jumper all summer and learn to stay down low.
Joe isn’t as good or bad as you all claim. His time here is done, his price tag is too high. I’d rather have 3-5 quality young guys developing for his $20 million.
Horford is no championship center, but a good coach could manage he, josh, Zaza and a legit C if championships and not personal stats were our focus.
Teague needs to work on play making and his jumper. He did well last year.
Marvin will never improve as our 6th option. Without the spotlight, he fails to check in.
wcj
July 1st, 2012
10:29 am
IF the Nets really want Joe Johnson that bad, and if the Altanta Hawks can Brooks Lopez and Marshon Brooks for him: Go for it!!!. Do you want Joe Johnson to remain in altanta? The Nets are willing to take his 90 million dollar contract. Please Danny, don’t blow this.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:32 am
@ Danny Dan
If Horford does not do well at PF then yes I can say he’s expendable, but until that time comes I doubt he’d be worse as a PF in fact he might get better without having to worry about the bigger Centers.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:34 am
When I think about the only SF’s Josh must challenge to ensure a spot at All-star only in the east is Melo and Lebron.
Honestly it’s really him vs. Lebron Melo is good, but only on that offensive side cause Josh outdoes him on the defensively it’s not even close.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:35 am
@ Fundamentals
Been awhile man good to have you back and I agree we all think a legit HC and not a caretaker is something the hawks seriously need. To be honest about 1/3 of the season through if L.D isn’t doing what he’s suppose to you can expect him to be fired.
Moorman
July 1st, 2012
10:36 am
The only thing horford has going is that mid range jumpshot and a better basketball i.q. than josh. Other than that, he is overated. The proof is the hawks were able to win without him. If that had been josh smith gone for 2/3 of the season instead of horford, the hawks wouldve been finished….
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:47 am
@ Moorman
Yet with Horford healthy we get to round 2 of the playoffs
Look at it this way back when we drafted Horford we never got to the playoffs with the core of just Marvin, Joe, and Josh.
Now adding both Horford and Bibby we get into the first round to be bounced by champs Boston Celtics.
Next year after Horford’s rookie season we get to round 2 and the year after that round 2 again. All the way up till now.
The 2011-2012 season we get to the playoffs without Al Horford why because yes Josh did improve a lot more than people willing to give credit. But without Horford we don’t make it into Round 2 even with Joe Johnson we didn’t make it to round 2.
Yeah Horford came back to play, but being real he wasn’t the same Horford from previous seasons or the start of this one because being out the loop for 4 months can do that to ya.
If come next year we just have Teague, Josh, and Zaza expect us to only make round one as a 6-8 seed or worse we don’t make it.
I like Josh, but realize that giving up Joe, Marvin, and Horford sets us back way toooo far.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:49 am
Blog monster ate my post GRRRR!!!
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:50 am
All I said was without Horford and Zaza we’re no better than a first round team.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
10:50 am
For those talking about Al and his salary, it is $12 mil every year for the next 4 years. All those other centers on the list will have higher salaries each year.
Melvin,
Hibbert is not worth a max contract, but that’s how owners get themselves in trouble. Indy may not want to take a step back (which they will if they lose Hibbert), so I can see them matching, especially since N.O. will match any offer to Eric Gordon.
If/When Indy does, they will lose a lot of flexibility going forward, and will continue to be a second round team (sound familiar)? .
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
10:55 am
I am not a fan of Brook Lopez. He is coming off an injury, and then he only averaged 4 rpg last year. For a 7’ center, that’s bad.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
10:59 am
@ Danny Dan
Thing is we don’t know what Horford would have posted had he stayed Healthy for all we know could have been a 20 ppg 15 rpg 3 bpg this year you never know now that he was out for 2/3.
As for Brook Lopez not a huge fan either, but we are trying to dump salary here and if Lopez is one of the people to be had so be it I’ll take that deal to get out of a contract like that.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
11:00 am
Also Danny I don’t think Ivan will post numbers like that he was good last year, but don’t get ahead of yourself.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:04 am
O ‘Brien – Lopez coming to Atlanta make this team better automatic.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:06 am
If the Hawks could get Brook Lopez and keep Josh, Teague, Horford, now we talking.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:09 am
Teague, Gerald Green , Josh, Horford, Lopez
Pargo, Jenkins, Marvin, Ivan, Zaza
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:13 am
Mike Scott and Anthony Morrow, Collins
Will be reserve.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Reality Check
July 1st, 2012
11:15 am
“1)Josh is a top 4 power forward and loves this position.”
Yep, that’s why he lost 25 pounds last summer, so he could fully embrace the PF position with the strength it needs. Oh, wait.
“2) Josh at the 3 takes one of the best interior defenders out of the post and on to the wing or perimeter for bombs way.”
LOL, Josh will bomb away regardless of which position he is listed. And on defense, exactly who is forcing Josh to not switch and guard the opposing PF on D? This idea that if he plays SF on offense that it’s automatic for him to guard the 3 is thinking totally inside the box.
Of course it’s a moot point since Josh is leaving after this season anyway. If he’s not traded before.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:25 am
Josh lost 25pounds during the summer so he could play SF but Horford was injured, so that force him to play PF majority at PF, look Horford is not a center and Josh is not a PF there both undersized, this team has no toughnest because Hawks continue to march out there every year Joe, Marvin, Josh, Horford.
If any one think this team is good enough to play with big boys don’t no basketball.
Hawks must find them a true center.
Brook Lopez make this team better ASAP.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
native atlantan
July 1st, 2012
11:26 am
I dont know if Ferry knows just how screwed up the hawks and their ownership group are yet, but he knows loosers when he sees them in most of the team already.
westt1
July 1st, 2012
11:27 am
i always fel t like jj wasnt worth at much money anyway dont demand the ball and not clutch cut your loss if new jersey want him please come get him
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:30 am
Teague, Gerald Green, Josh, Horford, Lopez
Hawks make it to Easter Conference Finals.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Melvin
July 1st, 2012
11:32 am
Has the Hawks reach out to any free agents? I haven’t seen any reports about them….
Melvin
July 1st, 2012
11:34 am
If the Hawks trade Joe to the Nets, you better believe Lopez will not be part of the deal. No way, the Nets will give up their last trade piece for Howard.
brigadierjerry
July 1st, 2012
11:37 am
gerwald wallace just signed 4 year deal with Nets for 40 million and Nets arent waiting on Howard. I think Deron signs with Nets and I think Joe Johnson is going to be traded. I dont necessarily means it will be to the Nets but I think Johnson will be traded as well as Marvin will be either traded or amnestied
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:38 am
Danny Ferry need to call Bill Laimbeer or Sam Mitchell.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
westt1
July 1st, 2012
11:44 am
moving that joe contract open up your cap we have 6 player under contract and over paying most of them there alot of good free agent out there start rebuilding
Ray
July 1st, 2012
11:49 am
@ Danny Dan
Guess what you keep saying Al is only a 12 ppg and 8 rpg
Then why is 2010-2011 season did he put up 15.3 ppg and 9.3 rpg might as well say 10 there were nights he had about 12 or more.
Not only that looking at his stat line for the regular season only now this year he averaged 12.4 ppg and 7.0 rpg with 1.3 bpg.
ONLY PLAYING 10 GAMES now come on man.
Horford has the chance to be a 20/10/2 per game type guy you in denial my friend.
Talking about living in neverland you really do if all you think Horford will do is put up only 12ppg and 8rpg.
Oh here is another fun fact when Horford came back he basically put up his exact numbers from 2010-2011 season in the playoffs only playing 3 games.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
11:58 am
Sekou Smith
HA
Great post
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:08 pm
Danny you didn’t even read the last post.
I’ll simplify it for you Al Horford had 15.3 pts 9.3 rebs and 1 blk last season 2010 and 2011.
That’s not even close to 12pts and 8rebs you must be talking about Zaza or even Marvin well nevermind Marvin sucks.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
12:09 pm
Sekou Smith – People keep saying Josh can’t play SF, I BE DAM
If anyone have been watching the Hawks this team is much better defensively with Josh at SF and Horford at PF.
Look the Hawks have no superstar on this team, and your not winning unless your build defensively.
Josh and Horford will not cut it because both players are undersize, this why Hawks must find them a center with size in the paint to compliment Josh and Horford.
Hawks 2years ago almost beat Bulls with Josh, Horford, Collins, so you can’t tell Lopez is not 10times better than Collins.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:10 pm
@ Danny Dan
It’s okay man you failed at trying to prove a point all you did prove to me is how stupid you can seriously be.
And again in Postseason play only in 3 games Horford put up 15.3 ppg 8.3 rebs and 1.3 blks only 3 games coming back from an injury like that very early too I might add.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:14 pm
@ BIG DOG
I agree with that statement people only saying Josh can’t play SF look at the dude’s frame size I mean for christ sake he’s Kevin Durant’s size for the most part. except shorter than Durant.
OH BTW just because you can play 3 different positions doesn’t mean you can play them effectively.
Josh can play PF, but Center you sh*tting me playing against Dwight, Hibbert, Perkins, Chalder, Bynum, and other C’s that are big night in and night out would put to much on him.
I like Josh, but a Center is one thing he won’t be able to play not no night in night out type thing either.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:16 pm
Again I make the case that if Horford had played more than he did this season his average would have jumped more than likely to at least 18 ppg. And 10 or more rpg.
If Horford trains a lot this offseason he will be something special next year.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
12:19 pm
http://youtu.be/mpkUkQzJ0Gg
Who say Josh can’t play SF, I BE DAM
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:19 pm
@ Danny Dan
you do realize that was this past year correct.
NBA had only 66 games this year
The Grand Total Al Horford played in 11 that’s so technically this season might as well not count for him as of right now his highest is 15.3 9.3 and 1 blk.
Which next season could go as high as 18, 11, and 2 blks he already averaged around 4 assists as well. So there is that.
Dude basically averages a double-double not even he does.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:22 pm
@ BIG DOG
Only those that don’t realize that’s who.
Teague, ?, Josh, Horford, and Lopez(again barring injury) Is better than
Teague, Johnson, Marvin, Smith, Horford.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
12:23 pm
The question mark is whomever is SG opening next year.
prison mike
July 1st, 2012
12:30 pm
• 2011 CBA: Teams must spend at least 85 percent of the cap in 2011-12 and 2012-13, and at least 90 percent of the cap in later years of the agreement.
Teams will have to spend 52.5 million or more in upcoming seasons. Teams with money are dangerous to teams like us who are way too close to lux tax and have to avoid like the plague.
Bottom line: either overspend for guys like hibbert and mayo or overspend for overseas talent and d league guys.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
12:33 pm
From hoopshype;
Adrian Wojnarowski: Nets, Hawks could reach a decision on possible Joe Johnson deal today, sources tell Y! If trade doesn’t happen, Nets will push for OJ Mayo.. Twitter
I’m all in favor of trading JJ, but I wish the Nets had better assets to offer us.
Adrian Wojnarowski: Rival executives say Atlanta is much more focused on moving Joe Johnson’s contract than talking about Josh Smith now.. Twitter
I hope they come to a decision today.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
12:36 pm
Ra’mon,
If what they say is true, what do you think about a max offer of 5 years, $79 mil for Hibbert?
STRETCH
July 1st, 2012
12:38 pm
Adrian Wojnarowski: Nets, Hawks could reach a decision on possible Joe Johnson deal today, sources tell Y! If trade doesn’t happen, Nets will push for OJ Mayo. Twitter
Reality Check
July 1st, 2012
12:40 pm
Why all the talk about lame duck Josh Smith? He’s gone. Either by trade, if Ferry is any good at his job, or else Josh will walk away at the end of the year, and we’ll have nothing for that asset. I don’t think Ferry is stupid enough to let Josh walk, though Sund probably would have, because he was the owners flunky. Bottom line: Bye Bye Josh, I’ll miss you. You played great last year, but we all know that you want a better situation.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
12:41 pm
Ray – Thanks bro, look the Hawks have no superstar, and we all no with out a superstar your not winning unless your build defensively and size and toughness.
Teague, ? , Josh, Horford, Lopez
is way much better than
Teague, Joe, Marvin, Josh, Horford.
5years is enough time for change.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
12:50 pm
OB, sounds like we are going to simply dump JJ1 at this stage.
Ferry has to decide if he wants any usable assets…..I would hope for Brooks and Lopez as I don’t think Humphries can be considered. A couple of usable pieces.
kbb
July 1st, 2012
12:54 pm
Why would Mike shut down the Joe thread, thats all anyone cares about. The other stuff is insignificant.
500 Blog entries
July 1st, 2012
12:56 pm
Enter your comments here
500 Blog entries
July 1st, 2012
1:00 pm
ooops – sheesh – I thought this was a college football town – as a former recent Hawks season ticket holder and a potential future Hawks season ticket holder, I dont have the patience to go thru another rebuilding – I like the nucleus of Teague, Joe, Josh, Horf and whomever at the 5 – and if NBA teams are not building for the specific purpose of getting past the Heat they are wasting their time – I say we resign the bench and grab a 7-footer with some post moves and let’s see how far we can go
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:01 pm
So the Nets are the only team that’s interested in JJ? What about Houston? Other teams have better assets, especially the Lakers if they will move Gasol.
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:02 pm
500, Joe/Josh/Al are barely 2nd tier in the East and are non-existant if they were in the West.
Ken Strickland
July 1st, 2012
1:04 pm
We’ve all seen rumors of Josh, JJ, and Horford possibly being traded, and nothing came close to happening. The only way for JJ to be traded to the Nets is if a sign and trade is worked out where he agrees to restructure his contract, and we take back some of their UFAs in return, like CHumphries. The only way Jersey would make a trade for JJ is if they’ve given up on getting DHoward.
Actually, I’d love having a rebounding machine like Humphries included in a trade for JJ. He’d give us even more of what we got from Ivan, plus he’s bigger and taller. If Ferry can pull this trade off, and get the JSmith and financial considerations, or MWilliams, for Gasol trade done, we’d have the makings of a solid core of Horford, Zaza, Gasol, Humphries, Teague, Scott, and Jenkins.
With this core, the ASG could justify paying a luxury tax to get a couple of quality veteran starters and some functional backups. The beauty of the 2 trade is we gain Gasol’s contract, which expires in 2 yrs, and get rid of JJ’s contract, which doesn’t expire for another 4yrs. If we don’t accomplish what we want to accomplish this yr and decide to go in another direction, we could easily trade Gasol’s expiring contract next yr.
Even though we’d be paying out close to the same amount of money, the Gasol contract would offer financial flexibility by allowing us to get rid of it after this season or the next.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
1:13 pm
@ Danny Dan
It’s not that hard to do, but to do so nightly basis yes it is.
Oh BTW if Horford is healthy he’s at least right behind Josh for number of Double-doubles just saying.
Probably at least No. 15
glw
July 1st, 2012
1:14 pm
@Ken S,
I agree that the only way they push for Joe is if they have given up on Dwight. But I dont think they have to restructure Joe’s deal to do it, It cant be restructured anyway for trade purposes. I am assuming that they have enough cap room to absorbs Joe’s salary without taking back equal value. I am still not totally buying this, why would New Jersey want to take on Joe’s contract? There are guys out there who can be had for half of what Joe makes.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
1:15 pm
Ken – Hawks are not going sign another PF, Hawks are loaded with 4 PF on team right now.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:16 pm
LMDO, 500…it ain’t me that’s keep Al here. I’m ready to move his 12M as well. I could get more from Humphries….what’s funny is the guy loves to be listed as a C on the all-star ballot, but when the game starts, he wants to face the basket and get out of the paint. He’s tired of guys being bigger than he is, yet I don’t see him growing his skills. I think he’s peaked and is probably a good 3rd go to guy….like Joe and Josh…
So how do you move 3 3’s and get value in return?
Jerry West
July 1st, 2012
1:17 pm
The only way for JJ to be traded to the Nets is if a sign and trade is worked out where he agrees to restructure his contract
@Ken
Dude, he can’t restructure his deal. This isn’t the NFL. His contract is what it is. If the Nets take him, they’re taking it as is with the full 4 yrs at 80+ mil.
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:21 pm
In regards to sign and trades….I think those are no longer an option going forward. I read that on NBA.com…..if someone signs Hinrich, we can’t get anything for him if we give sign him, then move him.
The sign&trade no longer exists based on what I read last week. But if a team signs a FA, can they move him immediately?
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
1:24 pm
As off right now Nets Have 55mill in cap space.
That some crazy sh t.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
mg
July 1st, 2012
1:26 pm
If Joe gets trade two things should happen
1. Give Ferry GM of the Year
2. Rename Phillips Arena to Ferry Arena
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:28 pm
We aren’t signing FAs until we resolve JJ1 and Josh.
Countdown 10 days to the beginning of amnesty period…..I hope Marvin’s career here ends at 487 games. Can you believe he has played 487 games? How many of those were productive?
Gone Viral
July 1st, 2012
1:32 pm
“The Brooklyn Nets reached a verbal commitment with swingman Gerald Wallace on a four-year deal worth $40 million, according to sources close to the process.”
Can they really afford this plus Howard, Deron *and* JJ?
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:33 pm
Wallace getting 40M for 4 years…the numbers are starting to get tight in Brooklyn.
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
1:35 pm
If you move Joe, would you take a crack at Brandon Roy? It might be worth a look. It definitely wouldn’t be a long term deal.
Grandad
July 1st, 2012
1:36 pm
Ken S
Who`s to say the Nets will not [or] are not going to include
Gerald Wallace into the trade {sign & trade].
Wallace would fill a need, [small forward / LBJ/defender]
*(once again add Tyshawn Taylor to the deal)
*TT; 2nd rounder; 6-3+; [pg] ; defense (strong suit)
Ray
July 1st, 2012
1:36 pm
@ Danny Dan
Wait Wait Wait so if we agree then what is your problem with Horford then?
Gone Viral
July 1st, 2012
1:37 pm
As an aside, here is the projected deal the Nets and Hawks are discussing:
“According to several reports, the Nets would receive Johnson in return for four expiring contracts: Anthony Morrow, Jordan Farmar, Johan Petro and Jordan Williams plus a first round pick in 2013, when the Nets have two picks, their own and the Rockets’ lottery protected pick.”
Just Joe
July 1st, 2012
1:42 pm
Take that deal NOW.
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
1:43 pm
“B. Knight, was not the hawks problem. He was very successful as gm.”
So successful he’s been out of work in the league since the Hawks S-canned him.
“If Mike Scott is also like [Ivan] like many others have said keeping him would be redundant.”
Ivan Johnson lit up the Heat last year. Scott may never see an NBA floor.
Reality Check
July 1st, 2012
1:43 pm
“On another front:
– ESPN.com Insider David Thorpe sees a scenario in which the Atlanta Hawks trade their all-star center Al Horford to the Charlotte Bobcats”
Yeah, right. I hope you have a time machine, cuz that scenario was for the 2nd pick in last week’s draft. Didn’t happen, now did it? Troll, are you that dumb? Or maybe that desperate?
I’m sure it’s frightening to you that Josh is gonna be gone. And, no two ways about it, he’s gone, either by the trade deadline, or by the end of his contract. I hope all four of the core are traded, personally. Blow it up right. Start with a blank slate, tank for 2 years, and get good picks.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
1:44 pm
@ Danny Dan
There is a reason most likely has to do with the attitude seriously I like Ivan Johnson, and we need some David West type players here and not this nice guy culture we’ve grown accustomed to. He has been known to have a bad attitude especially overseas.
Astro Joe
July 1st, 2012
1:47 pm
Some of y’all shouldg o back and read your own posts from the past few days to see how strange you have sounded. For months or years, trade Joe has been a constant themse around here. Now that it is a possibility, it is “welll they should only get this back”, or “why aren’t we trading him to this team”. Y’all are acting like spolied brats. If you believe that Joe’s contract is the root of all evil, then why not trade him to the Washington Generals for their scrubs on the bench? Trade him to Atlanta Community College for their walk-ons. Go back and read your posts from the past 24-36 hours.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
1:47 pm
@ Buddy G
Now think about it though Ivan will be 28 and that’s only one time. There were games he wasn’t effective now even I remember some of those.
I’m all for keeping him, but again if Mike Scott turns out to be another Ivan Johnson(plus better attitude) then why keep him.
Astro Joe
July 1st, 2012
1:48 pm
Al’s contract is $12M. Not $12-15M, just $12M.
Ken Strickland
July 1st, 2012
1:48 pm
http://network.yardbarker.com/nba/article_external/is_danny_ferry_on_the_verge_of_unloading_joe_johnsons_contract/11128979
It seems like the JJ trade possibility is more than just a silly rumor at this point, unlike the Horford for the #2 pick.
Just Joe
July 1st, 2012
1:49 pm
Jordan Williams in another 6′9″ PF/C. This could be another reason we saw the indecision with Ivan. He’s nowhere as good, but at some point you can only have so many 6′9″ guys.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
1:54 pm
@ Gone Viral
I could agree with that trade if that’s what we get back. Oh if this is real
Morrow, Farmar, Petro, and Williams and a first round pick it’s not the best deal ever, but two of the 4 are useful.
Honestly I’d love to have Marshon Brooks in that deal as he’s another hometown/state kid.
Buddy Grizzard
July 1st, 2012
1:57 pm
“Is that such a hard thing to average a double double?”
Kind of a silly question since your link shows that less than 10% of all NBA players had at least 10 double-doubles for an entire season.
“The only way for JJ to be traded to the Nets is if a sign and trade is worked out where he agrees to restructure his contract.”
Why? Brooklyn has less than $18m committed to 7 players right now. They could absorb Joe’s contract without sending any salary back to the Hawks. This is why Brooklyn needs to get this done NOW, because Deron wants to be under contract so he can play in the Olympics. Brooklyn has to make a deal for Joe, Dwight, whoever, BEFORE they can sign Deron and possibly Lopez (if he’s not agreeing to a sign-and-trade that sends him elsewhere). That’s why Brooklyn can’t wait around for Dwight’s situation to be resolved. They’re going to get Deron under contract as soon as they can. Dwight shot himself in the foot by opting in. Deron wants his contract done yesterday.
So here’s what the trade will most likely be:
Hawks receive:
Jordan Farmar
Anthony Morrow
Johan Petro
(2) conditional first round draft picks
Nets receive:
Joe Johnson
Ray
July 1st, 2012
1:57 pm
Right now like someone said If Joe contract is gone by this week Danny Ferry for Executive of the Year the hell with anything else.
If he gets Marvin gone Danny Ferry for President okay I’m over exaggerating, but still just saying.
Just Joe
July 1st, 2012
2:02 pm
Without Dwight, Nets could still look like this:
Williams / Kidd / Taylor
Johnson / Brooks
Wallace / Kirilenko
Teletovic / Humphries
Lopez / ??? / ???
Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:03 pm
Please Danny Ferry get this thing done then we can finally move on from such a horrible decision in ASG history of owning the hawks.
This is what happens when you hire a good GM stuff like this. Let me not get too ahead of myself though.
Just Joe
July 1st, 2012
2:05 pm
Hawks listed as having a possible interest in Rashard Lewis.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 1st, 2012
2:08 pm
C’mon, guys, enough already. Give me a break here.
bigdave
July 1st, 2012
2:08 pm
Atlanta, dallas, clips…
Interested in Ray Allen according to espn via hoopshype
Ken Strickland
July 1st, 2012
2:09 pm
Since JJs contract can’t be restructured, and thanks for the correction, it looks like the Nets will be trying to do a lot of sign and trades to cover enough of his salary to make it work. It looks to me like the Nets new owner is trying to pull off a JJohnson, DWilliams, DHoward deal simular to what Miami pulled off with DWade, LJames and CBosh.
If he’s willing to spend the money and pay the luxury tax, he might pull it off. It’s a trade that would give he Hawks a lot of flexiblity going forward, and maybe a very functional player or 2.
As you may have noticed, there’s an ANAL MINDED TROLL that’s been posting under my name. Just do what his mother obvously did, and ignore the obviously UNSUCCESSFUL ABORTION ATTEMPT.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:11 pm
@ Just Joe count me out of that one tooooo many PF’s not enough C’s or even SF’s for that matter.
Ken Strickland
July 1st, 2012
2:15 pm
MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM-There’s a troll that’s highjacked my name and is posting his or her special brand of ignorance. The 1:51pm, 2:02pm, and 2:05pm post are not my comments, but the 2:09M comment is. Please get his IP address and remove him from these blogs, thank you.
Vettledi
July 1st, 2012
2:15 pm
Boy oh boy I haven’t prayed in a long time but right now I’m down on my knees
Please make that trade possible I don’t give AF if we suck for a year and a half all I want is stop that Iso-Joe model that’s been goot but not great for too long.
Just Joe
July 1st, 2012
2:16 pm
Ray….didn’t you hear? Everyone is going to small ball.
There’s no way I would build that team either, but that appears to be what the Nets are trying to do. Existing talks with AK47 and Teletovic. Bird rights on Humphries. Wallace signed. Lopez a restricted free agent.
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
2:28 pm
I would think you could get a Brooks or Lopez or both…..I would think we could get more than what the rumor is…..
Petro, Farmer, & Williams are junk. We get a #1 2013 and Morrow?
geno
July 1st, 2012
2:28 pm
why joe just wont reconstruct his contract for the betterment of his team? hes showing me his selfishness and his non commitment to a title
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
2:29 pm
Trade Failed
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7g6c62d
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
2:30 pm
Rashard Lewis
Ray Allen
2 more guys that come here on their last stop out of the league.
KevinM
July 1st, 2012
2:32 pm
Petro making 3.5? That’s a joke!
And Marvin is still here…..
Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:33 pm
@ Danny Dan
NEVER HAVE I BEEN A FAN OF LD OR RICK SUND DON’T EVER SAY THAT AGAIN!
I wanted Woodson gone, but I’d sooner have him back then be stuck with Uncle Drew
Astro Joe
July 1st, 2012
2:33 pm
While none of these guys will make a lot of money, the rumors that the Hawks are interested in Brandon Bass, Rashard Lewis and Ray Allen suggests that Ferry expects to free up some cap space this summer.
HawkKingBibby
July 1st, 2012
2:36 pm
All trades fail. We are over the cap and the only pieces worth taking from the Nets are signed and traded players that have all kinds of restrictions.
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
2:37 pm
Buddy Grizzard -
How could the Hawks trade Joe for Anthony Morrow and Johan Petro and Jordan Farmer contract not match 10mill of, JUST DAM
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Astro Joe
July 1st, 2012
2:37 pm
geno, players can’t restructure contracts in the NBA. That is possible in baseball and football but not basketball. It is a violation of the labor agreement, so Joe isn’t being selfish, he is adhering to the rules of the league.
Ray
July 1st, 2012
2:39 pm
@ Just Joe
I think that’s a route no one wants to go the small ball route.
The only reason why Heat really won had to do with how young the OKC Thunder were IMO this is like one of those years where Pistons won the whole thing without a superstar, but you still going to need the Big Centers to dominate the paint area.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
2:39 pm
Just Joe, I’m gald to finally see some Hawks rumors.
Marc J. Spears: Expect Heat, Celtics, Lakers, Hawksand Knicks to have interest in free agent Rashard Lewis once he clears waivers, source tells Y! .Twitter
If the price is right, I would take Rashard Lewis.
Marc J. Spears: While Celtics free agent Brandon Bass interested in re-signing, Pacers, Nets, Mavs, Heat (sign and trade), Knicks and Hawks intrigued too.. Twitter
For the price Brandon Bass will cost, give me Ivan, who will be much much cheaper.
O'Brien
July 1st, 2012
2:41 pm
And for those asking about sign and trade…it is still possible;
Adrian Wojnarowski: Phoenix has expressed interest with Landry Fields as part of possible sign-and-trade package with New York for Steve Nash, sources tell Y! Twitter
Gone Viral
July 1st, 2012
2:41 pm
I don’t claim to understand the esoteric rules of the NBA trade system, but Farmar and his $4.25 million opt-in are not listed on the ESPN trade generator. The trade specifics I posted are from NetsDaily.com.
glw
July 1st, 2012
2:44 pm
@BIG DOG
The trade probably would work on trade machine but Farmar’s opted in late and his salary isnt included yet for the trade machine, I think his salary would push the Nets over the needed 50% of Joe’s salary that they would have to take back.
Astro Joe
July 1st, 2012
2:45 pm
A sign and trade can only be for a max of 4 years (as opposed to 5 if you sign with the current/old team). So the player has to accept one less year (and less total money) to go to a different team. I think players at the end of their career will be ore willing to complete a S&T than those either peaking or in their prime.
Slimjr
July 1st, 2012
2:46 pm
28-47 again the winners? This core are pretenders!
Jettison the CORE asap!
BIG DOG
July 1st, 2012
2:46 pm
Hawks could trade Joe in a sign and trade with Lopez and Morrow and Johan Petro other than that this deal not work unless Lopez is involve.
Lopez 6 year 72mill
12mill a year
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
Michael Cunningham
July 1st, 2012
2:47 pm
new blog posted. shutting down this thread.
Reality Check
July 1st, 2012
2:48 pm
“This thing about having more cap space was one of the reasons D12 did not want to come to Atlanta, no money.”
Wrong again troll. The reason D12 doesn’t want to come to the ATL is because he thinks it’s a “podunk town” as he said, and he’ll get more endorsement money in Brooklyn. If you think for a second that playing with Josh is more important to Dwight than endorsement money, you are even crazier than you seem.
Nets trying to get Joe Johnson – ESPN | Sports News
July 1st, 2012
5:07 pm
[...] the Atlanta Hawks for All-Star guard Joe Johnson, according to sources briefed on the discussions.Atlanta Hawks: NBA free agency beginsAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)2012 NBA Trade Rumors: Nets, Hawks Working On Joe Johnson Deal; [...]
Nets trying to get Joe Johnson – ESPN | Free NBA Videos
July 1st, 2012
6:09 pm
[...] the Atlanta Hawks for All-Star guard Joe Johnson, according to sources briefed on the discussions.Atlanta Hawks: NBA free agency beginsAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)2012 NBA Trade Rumors: Nets, Hawks Working On Joe Johnson Deal; [...]