More from my interview yesterday with Hawks GM Rick Sund.
MC: What is your evaluation of the season?
Sund: There are two seasons. Once you become a real playoff team, there are two seasons. I thought we had an unbelievably great first season: 40 wins, key people hurt, the players and Larry [Drew] kept their focus. We ended up having the fourth-best record in the East. I thought with all the adversity it was really a great year with the compressed schedule and all the obstacles a team has to climb, which every team has those obstacles. I thought it was good.
The second part of the season is the playoffs and that’s disappointing. I think a great thing when you go through the [exit] interview process you get to talk to the players, and to a man—I still have a couple to do—but to a man they all think we should still be playing. And that’s a good thing. There’s disappointment in their heart. They look [at the playoffs] and feel they are good enough to be playing at the championship level.
MC: When you evaluate the team, are you able to separate out the effects of all the injuries from where you need to get better?
Sund: Two-and-a-half weeks after the season, you are a little bit more pragmatic. The emotions are out of the focus. When you look at it and you have to say, the last four years this team in the Eastern Conference has had the third-or fourth-best record either by the end of the regular season or by getting through the first round and getting to the second round. We’ve had the third- or fourth-best record in the last four years. Our goal is to get into those top two [in the East], because that’s when you have a legitimate shot to get to the finals. That’s that championship level. That’s the NBA’s version of the Final Four. You want to be one of those top two teams playing at the end of May and into June because you’ve got a legitimate shot to win a championship. We’ve fallen short of that. That’s our goal. Having said that, we have to look at our club and say where are the areas we can improve, what can we do without taking a step back. So we will have to explore all opportunities.
MC: The team’s deficiencies were mostly on offense, which came to fruition against the Celtics, a very good defensive team. From a personnel standpoint, how can the team improve offensively?
Sund: Again, you say separate the injuries, you really can’t, because if your key personnel are core members of your club, you are going to miss the points that that person may bring or the rebounds. I think we were one of the better defensive teams in the league, something last season we really wanted to focus on. I think Larry and the team did a great job. Points-wise it was Chicago one, Boston two, Philly three, Miami four, Memphis five, we are sixth. Defending in certain areas [like] field-goal percentage. In all of that, we really improved. I think that was the strength of our team. Now we have got to focus on, can we score a little more. Having said that, our offensive efficiency—which I know you are a big stat guy—was really good in the fourth quarter, particularly the last five minutes of the game. Joe [Johnson] in particular [was good] in crunch time. We were good in the fourth quarter, we were good in overtime games, close games. You are always looking at how you get better. I think some of that will come, if the team is the same, from [Jeff] Teague. Teague is going to continue to get better. He got a lot of easy shots for us in the playoffs for some of our players. Joe really improved his 3-point shooting. Marvin [Williams] shot the 3-pointer pretty good. You are asking me questions that really Larry should answer but I think, overall, the dialogue from the coaching staff and the management last year was [about] defense. We’ve got to focus on that and we can manufacture and we have enough talent to get shots.
MC: Why do you think things like good offensive efficiency in fourth quarter didn’t translate to the playoffs?
Sund: I haven’t really zeroed in on that. I think with the exception of the blowout game, all of the games—and we pretty much dominated Game 1-you take those two games out and the other four games were pretty close and could have gone either way. It was a missed shot here and a missed shot there.
MC: We saw the tension between Joe’s deliberate style that he likes to play and LD’s motion offense, something that he expressed his frustration about at one point. Can that tension be resolved with this personnel?
Sund: That question should be to Coach.
MC: Do you plan to extend a tender to Ivan [Johnson]?
Sund: I’m not going to comment on that right now.
MC: Will you try to sign Josh Smith to an extension?
Sund: I’m not going to get into contract stuff.
MC: Josh had a great year production-wise but–
Sund: I think it was the best year Josh has had, at least in the four years I’ve been here. I’ve said it for the record and I’ll say it again: Irrespective of how the voting came out, he should have been an All-Star. I thought Josh had an absolutely terrific year. He did a great job of making sure, hey, we lost some huge production with [Al] Horford and he picked it up.
MC: But his offensive efficiency fell off, and a large part of that is because he’s taking more shots away from the basket and not shooting–
Sund: You have to ask those questions to Larry.
MC: But from a personnel standpoint, do you think he fits with what Larry is trying to do offensively?
Sund: Yes.
MC: Does that mean the migration away from the basket–
Sund: Those are questions you have to ask Larry. I think he’s an All-Star player. He played a total All-Star caliber play this year. He’s been exceptional in the post. I thought his defense was great. He’s one of the better passing power forwards in the league. I think he had a very good year.
MC: Is it your perception Josh is still happy being here with the Hawks?
Sund: I’m going to have his exit interview sometime this week. But, yeah, when you read the things of him saying . . . He’s such a competitor. I was talking to his dad the other day, and he mentioned we all think we should be playing, and that’s great. And [Josh] is one of them.
MC: Can you discuss tour team salary situation going forward?
Sund: I don’t like to talk about it until we find out what the taxes are and the league does its audit. We are in a situation where we have six guys under contract and we will have to fill in either via trade, first-round pick, second-round pick. How much room [under the tax level] do we have to use the mid-level, the bi-annual. We have all of those exceptions. Its’ too early to say.
MC: Is it possible you may have to build the same way as last year, when you had to find some value with minimum-salaried guys?
Sund: Many of the good teams are going to have to finesse their way around and look at that as an option. If you don’t want to be a perennial taxpayer, you have to look at those options. . . . I thought our team this year had a legitimate chance to get to the one or two spot [in the East]. We ended up with the fourth-best record in the [East] but we thought we could still be playing. I asked ownership if we think we are going to have a chance to make a run at it, we are going to have to dip our toe into and go into the tax and pay a little bit of tax. And they did it with no problem. We are an official taxpayer this year and I thought that was a good move for us given the injuries.
MC: I know you probably haven’t had much chance to study prospects in detail, but do you have an idea of the quality of depth in the draft?
Sund: I’m a real division of labor guy and that’s Dave Pendergraft and Mike McNeive, they focus on that all the time. I am getting more involved. During the year I go out and see some people but really focusing in on the groupings, where we pick at 23 who is going to be there, who do I really need to look at, who do you like in the combines, who do you not like. Chicago [combine] has become a really good tool because it’s basically all interviews for two or three days. That’s turned out to be really more productive than even in the past, when they just play.
MC: Have you gotten a feel from Dave and Mike on what they think about the draft prospects?
Sund: They’ve handled the draft pretty good the last couple of years. We got a good player in Teague and we got a good player in [Jordan] Crawford, which we parlayed into [Kirk] Hinrich. They feel that we will get a quality player at the 23rd pick, or there are quality people there. There are a few people they like that they might want to move down to get. Who knows. It’s way too early to tell. The lottery is tonight and next week is when it really starts to focus.
MC: How do you think that Crawford trade turned out now that Hinrich’s contract is expiring?
Sund: We felt we could make a run last year. Not quite as good as this year [but] we had to get through Orlando. It was the first time in four years we didn’t have home-court advantage and many people picked Orlando to win the conference. And then we took the best team record-wise [the Bulls] where we won the first game and then won another game. Hinrich didn’t play in that [series]. We like to think if Hinrich did play we would have advanced that round. It’s just unfortunate he came in with the injury this year. But I don’t think there’s any question in my mind that we wouldn’t have advanced to the second round last year without Kirk on our team.
Michael Cunningham, Hawks beat
535 comments Add your comment
Astro Joe
May 31st, 2012
10:11 am
I wonder if we had lost to Chicago in 6 games in 2011 with Rose averaging more in that series than he did during his MVP regular season, if Hinrich’s value would have been perceived differently?
Dawg
May 31st, 2012
10:14 am
Such enlightening information. I have so much confidence in Sund. We are in great hands. Sund is a visionary!
If you read that transcript, you have a good idea why it is hard for anyone to get excited about the direction of the Hawks.
Sugar Ray
May 31st, 2012
10:20 am
Uh oh, MC pressed him on Josh’s trending inefficiency?!
Time to get my popcorn and…. observe.
TMACfan
May 31st, 2012
10:26 am
Great stuff MC!
Sugar Ray
May 31st, 2012
10:26 am
“MC: But his offensive efficiency fell off, and a large part of that is because he’s taking more shots away from the basket and not shooting–
Sund: You have to ask those questions to Larry.
MC: But from a personnel standpoint, do you think he fits with what Larry is trying to do offensively?
Sund: Yes.
MC: Does that mean the migration away from the basket–
Sund: Those are questions you have to ask Larry.”
This is outstanding. It reveals everything you need to know about all three of them actually.
teedub
May 31st, 2012
10:30 am
“our offensive efficiency—which I know you are a big stat guy—was really good in the fourth quarter, particularly the last five minutes of the game. Joe [Johnson] in particular [was good] in crunch time.”
Is this spin or is he just out of touch?
AG
May 31st, 2012
10:32 am
Why would you not have had an exit interview with one of the top players? Who cares about Damp, Stack, etc – as far as exit interviews. I want to know exactly from our best player and his opinions.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
10:41 am
“Once you become a real playoff team, there are two seasons.”
So I guess that means the Hawks only have one season.
“to a man—I still have a couple to do—but to a man they all think we should still be playing. And that’s a good thing. ”
Of course, the owners of this team would be perfectly happy if they were still playing and lost this series. After all, the goal is to be a top 2 team in the East, right?
“We’ve had the third- or fourth-best record in the last four years. ”
They were the 6 seed last year and had the 5th best record.
“Our goal is to get into those top two [in the East], because that’s when you have a legitimate shot to get to the finals.”
Lol.
“Points-wise it was Chicago one, Boston two, Philly three, Miami four, Memphis five, we are sixth.”
Points per game, huh? I am shocked that the Hawks haven’t started using advanced metrics yet.
“I haven’t really zeroed in on that. ”
I mean, he only has five years of evidence, right? How could he possibly know by now?
“I think with the exception of the blowout game, all of the games—and we pretty much dominated Game 1″
Domination, baby. Love those double digit playoff wins. Oh, wait…
“you take those two games out and the other four games were pretty close and could have gone either way. ”
Yeah, and if you take the 26 regular season losses out, the Hawks went undefeated.
” It was a missed shot here and a missed shot there.”
It was a missed shot here, and a missed shot there, and a missed box out here, and a bad pass there, and about twenty broken possessions… but other than that we were ELITE!
“MC: We saw the tension between Joe’s deliberate style that he likes to play and LD’s motion offense, something that he expressed his frustration about at one point. Can that tension be resolved with this personnel?
Sund: That question should be to Coach.”
LD: That question should be to Owner.
Gearon: That question should be to GM.
“Irrespective of how the voting came out, he should have been an All-Star. ”
Hey, I never said anything to promote him during the All Star selection process and now Josh is p-ssed at me and wants out, but it’s not too late to stick up for him, right? Right guys?
“MC: But from a personnel standpoint, do you think he fits with what Larry is trying to do offensively?
Sund: Yes.”
WE LOVE JUMPSHOTS.
“I’m going to have his exit interview sometime this week. But, yeah, when you read the things of him saying . . . He’s such a competitor. I was talking to his dad the other day, and he mentioned we all think we should be playing, and that’s great. And [Josh] is one of them.”
None of this answers the question as to whether he thinks Josh is happy here.
“I don’t like to talk about it until we find out what the taxes are and the league does its audit. We are in a situation where we have six guys under contract and we will have to fill in either via trade, first-round pick, second-round pick. How much room [under the tax level] do we have to use the mid-level, the bi-annual. We have all of those exceptions. Its’ too early to say.”
Something tells me he’s not going to talk about it after he finds out about taxes and what not either.
“I thought our team this year had a legitimate chance to get to the one or two spot [in the East].”
I also saw a flying pig f-cking a unicorn the other day while Bigfoot videotaped it.
“I asked ownership if we think we are going to have a chance to make a run at it, we are going to have to dip our toe into and go into the tax and pay a little bit of tax. And they did it with no problem. We are an official taxpayer this year and I thought that was a good move for us given the injuries.”
Hey Mike, Bruce, I know this is a little tough to swallow… but if we want to make a run at it, we HAVE to sign Erick Dampier. There’s no way around it.
“I’m a real division of labor guy and that’s Dave Pendergraft and Mike McNeive, they focus on that all the time.”
We love division of labor around here. Larry answers all the basketball questions, Dave and Mike answer all the personnel and scouting questions, and I play Doodle Jump all day.
“I am getting more involved. During the year I go out and see some people but really focusing in on the groupings, where we pick at 23 who is going to be there, who do I really need to look at, who do you like in the combines, who do you not like. Chicago [combine] has become a really good tool because it’s basically all interviews for two or three days. That’s turned out to be really more productive than even in the past, when they just play.”
Who needs to travel around during the season watching players play in ACTUAL GAMES when you can just watch them at the combine?
“We got a good player in Teague and we got a good player in [Jordan] Crawford, which we parlayed into [Kirk] Hinrich.”
We got one good player, and we refused to play him, so we traded another good player to hold him back even longer.
“There are a few people they like that they might want to move down to get. ”
June 28, 2012, 5:30 PM. Breaking news: Atlanta Hawks trade the #23 overall pick to the San Antonio Spurs for the #30 overall pick and $3 million cash.
“And then we took the best team record-wise [the Bulls] where we won the first game and then won another game. Hinrich didn’t play in that [series]. We like to think if Hinrich did play we would have advanced that round.”
We’d like to think that if we continued to bury Teague on the bench instead of playing him out of necessity and watching him have a breakout series, we would have been better off.
Lon Stotts
May 31st, 2012
10:47 am
The way he’s spinning things makes it sound like Sund is posturing himself for a return. Great. Parlayed JC2 into Hinrich?
Q: Is a role player ever worth one starter* and two first round picks?
Sund: Don’t forget we got Hilton Armstrong in that deal!
This guy hasn’t a clue.
*Grandpa Bibby
Bdfshjdf
May 31st, 2012
10:47 am
Nice interview, thanks for taking it up a notch and jabbing him with a few critical questions MC, you did a good job.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
10:51 am
FTPB
“2nd;
It`s like someone said the other day:
[apologies to the source]
HOF in basketball includes College & international.”
Good point. I said that. And you’re right, based on his international and Olympic accomplishments, Gasol has a pretty good shot at the Hall of Fame.
With that said, I stand by what I said earlier. The only thing separating Gasol from Stoudemire and Bosh are the rings he won as a supporting player. He has won zero career playoff games as the best player on his team. If the Heat win a championship this year, Bosh has as good of a Hall of Fame case as Gasol does if not better.
If you only take NBA accomplishments into consideration, I don’t think any of those three are Hall of Famers.
I am not a huge fan of basketball-reference’s Hall of Fame probability since it seems somewhat arbitrary to me (Nash should be much higher on that list, for one), but they have Bosh actually ranked higher than Gasol right now.
“3rd;
One can make the case, PG is the 2nd best Euro
to play in the NBA.”
Yeah, and Yao is the best Chinese player to play in the NBA. Does that make him a Hall of Famer?
“4th;
Since when did Kobe win the Title by himself.
Most people recognize that Kobe woul not have won
his last two rings w/o Gasol.”
Well, he wouldn’t have won them without Bynum either, but that doesn’t make Bynum a Hall of Famer.
“5th;
What is potential anyway ?
PG has been a very productive player.
Holds most career records for Memphis franshise.”
Gerald Wallace holds most career records for the Bobcats and has been a very productive player. Doesn’t make him a Hall of Famer.
“the Kobe propaganda machine places blame on Pau
to take the responsibilty, blame, accountability from Kobe;
yet Kobe gets all the credit when LAL wins a championship.”
That is how it works for the best player on the team. The best player is usually the primary reason why a team wins a championship. Shaq was the best player on the three-peat Kobe-Shaq Lakers, so he gets the majority of the credit for those rings (from me anyway). Kobe was the best player on the last two Lakers championship teams, so he gets the majority of the credit for those.
Pau is good. At his peak, he was very good. But it is the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Very Good.
WeBurn
May 31st, 2012
10:54 am
So obviously they are bringing back the same team and hoping that it will work out differently. What a joke. We’ve been trying that for years, things aren’t changing.
What is the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over and hoping for different results.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
10:56 am
^One edit to the post above: based on international accomplishments Yao will almost certainly make it to the Hall of Fame, but the question was really whether he would make it based on NBA accomplishments. I was a big fan of Yao but it would be a close call solely based on what he did in the NBA.
drmaryb .(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
10:57 am
I hope Rick stays in Atlanta. We’re getting close to having a championship team here.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
11:00 am
He will be back!!!!!!!!! What a load of bullcrap.
Astro Joe
May 31st, 2012
11:10 am
You know the old story about how when NASA was working on the first trip to the moon, everyone in the building could speak to the same organizational mission. Supposedly, if you asked the janitor what he was doing while he swept the floor, he would answer “I am sending a man to the moon”. It is a classic story used in organizations to highlight the “everyone rowing in the same direction” thing.
Meanwhile, when asked questions about specific player performance or team tendencies, our GM with 4 toes in the building and 6 toes out the door says “go ask the head coach”.
For the upteenth time… the dysfunction starts up high and trickles down below. It is an all-consuming dysfunction.
It was not a bad pick
May 31st, 2012
11:14 am
I would have asked Sund why Marvin, who was almost the #1 pick in the draft has never been used right
Mike
May 31st, 2012
11:14 am
First of all, Great Job MC, you ask the tough questions except one.
“With all the (non)-moves that this team does, name one thing that is going to get Hawks fans excited and want to spend their hard earned money on this team and go to the arena?”
But seriously, I am thinking something else is happen behind the scenes, Give Drew and Sund (Maybe?) one extra year with lack of commitments, knowing that Josh isnt coming back, with Zaza and Jeff (RFA) contacts is up, Marvin with his option as well and other factors, I am starting to think that they have something else going on.
Besides I dont hat that a team would be so stupid to contine the same path, know in fact its going to fail and fail hard.
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
11:15 am
“I thought we had an unbelievably great first season: 40 wins,”
Although we lostt to most of the above 500 teams we played. This guy is clueless. No chance in hell we have of winning a championship with Sund and Drew.
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
11:17 am
“Marvin [Williams] shot the 3-pointer pretty good.”
Take a look at his numbers against playoff teams Mr. Sund. It might surprise you. SMH
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:22 am
ENTER YOUR COMMENTS HERE!
The best part about the MC Hammer -vs- GM Sund – Dance Academy Award Winner interviews are:
The Najeh Daven-Poop responses.
They are the best rebuttals of all time!
Hands down HOBF (Hall of Bloggers Fame) material. – Four Thumbs Up! – (if you like toe fkg),
- drmaryeb – The Entertainment Reporter
___________
Hey Sund! Eat … S h y t & D y e.
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
11:22 am
“Points-wise it was Chicago one, Boston two, Philly three, Miami four, Memphis five, we are sixth.”
Mr. Sund. We averaged 82 ppg in the playoffs, and 96ppg in the regular season. Which one do you think is more important?
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
11:25 am
drmaryb.,
I already know the answer, but there is no chance of my guy Paul (The Punisher) Williams, from Aiken, SC walking again is there?
tony
May 31st, 2012
11:26 am
Hire Chris Mullin to replace Rick Sund.
PMC
May 31st, 2012
11:27 am
But Rick, THEY’VE NEVER BEEN TO THE CONFERENCE FINALS.
My gosh it’s like they still don’t get that they are not good enough at anything in any position.
The regular season doesn’t even matter. We don’t start paying attention to the NBA until APRIL!
KevinM
May 31st, 2012
11:29 am
Sund is staying DMB because he thinks we can still reach our ‘goal’ of being a top 2 East team. BUT!
We are so close except for injuries, except for a bad ref call, except for having to go over the tax to bring in a legit couch potatoe.
How many more excuses is this GM allowed to come up with? This is a ‘1st season’ team and a lottery team in the playoffs. But for some reason, it takes more than 5 years with the same players to figure that out.
Joe has improved his 3 pt shooting…that’s funny!
Josh fits right in with what Coach wants…..um, what does Coach want? More jumpers and wasted 24 second possessions?
Please MC, his comments only rile us up. He does nothing to point out how we can improve. His only interest is not stepping back.
Well, didn’t we step back this year? 5th seed, losing in the 1st round?
What is his definition of not stepping back?
Rick Sund has no clue how to run a championship contender. And with the ASG not allowing Portland to interview him? That’s a farce because they are showing how satisfied they are.
For Rick to say his draft staff would look to move down in the draft instead of moving up tells you how limited we are. We have no interest in the top 22 guys coming out. Totally unacceptable approach for a guy who has a lot of say here in Atlanta.
Leave Rick Sund…..we’ve seen enough of your act.
PMC
May 31st, 2012
11:29 am
It’s amazing people in this city ever even walk through the doors of a professional arena.
There are no winners in the front offices of this city period. No one apparently has a clue.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:29 am
Troll Alert!
“drmaryb .(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
10:57 am
I hope Rick stays in Atlanta. We’re getting close to having a championship team here.”
__________
Why would the biggest Sund Hater on this blog say something stupid like this? Get a HANDLE – Troll!
Until something else really breaks on here, you guys will be seeing less and less of drmaryb this Summer … I’ve dusted off my “razor sharp Cheetah Thong” & I’ll be stripping a pole over at Magic City, in the meantime – (for entertainment purposes only).
smdhlmaorofKTMFCfckThe ASKGandthehorsetheyrodeinonOHyeah&F-Usund
PMC
May 31st, 2012
11:33 am
The Eastern Confrence has proven to be terrible this year with the exception of Miami, and we couldn’t compete in that playoff environment.
This team has done absolutely nothing of consequence since the team was blown up and rebuilt (poorly under Knight and Woody.
Nothing. Make the ECF ONE TIME, just once. then we can talk about great seasons.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:36 am
MC!
You did a great job of sticking your questions to elicit those BS responses from The Sund-Dance Kid. You were quite professional in your task and, exhausted that fool to reveal the truth.
A BIG shout out from me to you there!
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:38 am
#1 RICKY SUND FAN!!
So long, blog babies! All I care about now is BEEFCAKES!
*smooches*
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
11:41 am
“Our goal is to get into those top two [in the East], because that’s when you have a legitimate shot to get to the finals. That’s that championship level.”
Ok. So Doc Rivers has purposely rested guys at the end of the season in the past couple of years not concerned with seeding because he knew his team needed the rest. They finished 4th this year, and are playing in the ECF, but our gm is concerned about finishing in the top 2 during the regular season?
O'Brien
May 31st, 2012
11:45 am
Rod,
Najeh also posted some stats about Marvin’s 3pt %. If you take away 3 games in which he shot very well from 3, his % was really closer to 34%. And if I’m not mistaken, his 3-pt % against playoff teams were not that great either.
Same thing with JJ. Rick referenced his crunch time and 4th quarter numbers, but most of those numbers came against bad teams.
Rick also said “many people picked Orlando to win the conference”. last year. Like who? Everybody still had Miami #1, and then Orlando/Chicago fighting for the #2 spot. But I doubt people were picking Orlando to go to the NBA finals, especially after the GM made the moves he did.
And he mentioned going into LT. What he didn’t mention was we had to sell a 2nd round pick to pay for it SMH.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:55 am
Query!
“drmaryb.,
I already know the answer, but there is no chance of my guy Paul (The Punisher) Williams, from Aiken, SC walking again is there?” – Rod from College Park -
___________
“Williams, 30, severed his spinal cord when he was thrown from his motorcycle Sunday morning in Marietta, Ga. Police said he was driving too fast for conditions.” – ESPN -
Rod, You are the first person to bring this to my attention – Just WOW! To answer your question, NO … Paul Williams will NEVER walk again. The brain and spinal cord is not recoverable. As a patient of spinal surgery myself, and a lifetime of severe spinal vertebrae dysfunction from congenital (birth defect) issues leading to extreme spinal cord stenosis (compression) – I know all to well how bad this is.
That is why I chose chiropractic over western allopathic medicine ( that which only treats symptoms and not root causes). This is devastating news to me, being a native of Aiken, SC. I know Paul Williams and his entire family, personally. I love and ride motorcycles myself, but, I am reconsidering that love now.
The ER doctors call motorcycle riders: organ donors for a reason. Paul Williams is LUCKY to be alive today. BTW, Joe Louis is a member of my family. Growing up, my Grandmother has a family photo of Joe Louis on her wall. I never met him though.
Thanks for the question – Rod and, for remembering that I am from Aiken, SC / Augusta, GA area. (just nine miles from Augusta – (my second home)).
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:57 am
I could fix that spine, after someone bends mine out for a while *wink wink*
Someone hose me off!!
Grandad
May 31st, 2012
12:03 pm
The Dumbest Response to any Two questions
I`ve ever heard in my life !
____ _ ____ _ ____ _ ____ _ ____ _ ____ _ ____ _ ____
MC:
I know you probably haven’t had much chance
to study prospects in detail,
but do you have an idea of the quality of depth in the draft?
Sund:
I’m a real division of labor guy
and that’s Dave Pendergraft and Mike McNeive,
they focus on that all the time. I am getting more involved.
____________________________________________
MC:
Have you gotten a feel from Dave and Mike
on what they think about the draft prospects?
Sund:
They’ve handled the draft pretty good the last couple of years.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
12:11 pm
Kevin Everett fractured and dislocated his spinal cord and is now walking again. I don’t know if that is the same thing as “severed” though.
Cwebb
May 31st, 2012
12:17 pm
A little recap for those who don’t have the time to read it carefully:
The organisation wants to be a top 4 team in the league to have the opportunity to compete for a championship. In that regard, the regular season was good but the playoffs were a disappointment. The players felt it was possible. Injuries didn’t help them…
They were a good defensive team that now needs to improve on the offensive end. Teague improvevement seems to be the key. Sund wants to improve the team without taking a step back. He is open to all opportunities: minimum vets, trades, draft picks. If he feels the team has a chance to win it all, they will go over the cap once again.
Dave Pendergraft and Mikr McNeive are the ones that work on the 2012 draft class. They both thinks there are good players available with the 23th pick.
Btw, I’m a french hawks fan who has an english exam next week. Feel free to correct my mistakes ! I would appreciate your help !
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
12:29 pm
The Brown Bomber! (RIP)
Joe Louis: Born: May 13, 1914
Lexington, Alabama
Died: April 12, 1981
Las Vegas, Nevada
African American boxer
African American boxer Joe Louis was world heavyweight champion from 1937 to 1948. He defended his title twenty times in four years.
Early years
Joseph Louis Barrow, born on May 13, 1914, was the seventh of eight children of Munroe Barrow and Lily Reese. His father was an Alabama sharecropper and died when Joe was four. His mother took in washing to support her family. Joe was close to his large family, particularly to his mother, from whom he inherited a deep religious sentiment. His mother married Patrick Brooks, with children of his own, when Joe was seven, and the family moved to Detroit, Michigan, in 1926.
After Brooks lost his job, Joe and his brothers shined shoes, ran errands, and sold newspapers before and after school to help out the family. Joe also worked as an assistant to an ice-wagon driver. He later said that carrying heavy ice helped him to develop his big shoulder muscles.
Final years
Unfortunately, drugs took a toll on the once indomitable (not able to be beaten) champion in his final years. In 1969, he was hospitalized after collapsing on a New York City street. While the incident was at first credited to “physical breakdown,” Louis later admitted to cocaine use and fears of a plot against his life. The following year, Louis spent five months in the hospital suffering from paranoid delusions (irrational anxiety and fear toward others). Strokes and heart ailments caused his condition to worsen. He had surgery to correct an aortic aneurysm (abnormal widening of a blood vessel) in 1977 and was thereafter confined to a wheelchair.
Despite failing health, Louis still found time to attend major boxing events. On April 12, 1981, he sat ringside at the Larry Holmes and Trevor Berbick heavyweight championship bout at Caesar’s Palace. Hours after the fight, Louis went into cardiac arrest (a heart failure) and died at the age of sixty-six.
In 1994, the bronzed boxing glove that Louis used to defeat Max Schmeling was donated to the city of Detroit by the Michigan Jewish Sports Hall of Fame. Dubbed “The Glove That Floored Nazi Germany,” it was enshrined in a plexiglass case at the city’s Cobo Center, a monument to Louis’s enduring legacy.
______
Read more: Joe Louis Biography – life, family, children, name, school, mother, information, born, drugs, contract http://www.notablebiographies.com/Lo-Ma/Louis-Joe.html#b#ixzz1wSob2Yn0
______
My Father, Eddie at age 5 would hang out at the local barber shops in NYC and shine shoes for a nickel. He was moved to Aiken, SC and attended high school with my Mother (Private School for Blacks – Catholic). As a kid, my Dad would cut hair on the side and, eventually became a licensed barber in 1961. Joe Louis and he were very close and ironically, when I moved to Atlanta, GA in 1986. I started a business as a “shoe shine girl” in Buckhead where, I lived.
I could not find work right away, so instinctively I began this SHOE SHINE Business and, landed a corporate contract to “pick up and drop off shoes in office buildings. I hired 30 some odd girls to do the physical work and, we made 50K in my first month at age 21. We had shoe shine stands also at the World Congress Center Downtown- Omni, The Airport, The Marriott Marquis, Windy Hill & Marriott Airport – where I met Bobby Brown & many other celebrities.
My Mother was appalled that I was in Atlanta and, shining shoes? – But, no job was beneath me, ( i also delivered pizzas & cleaned toilets) – failure was not an option! I guess the entrepreneurial spirit was in my blood lines – hugh?
Too bad, my Mother died when I was 24 years old and, never lived to see me become a doctor. (RIP Myrtle James). Here’s my point: I never knew that Joe Louis shined shoes too and, I didn’t do it because my Father started out shining shoes – it never once crossed my mind as to why I chose to do that – Grand Hustle!
Like all women – I just love shiny shoes! I own about 3,00 pairs of Italian leather shoes. The most I’ve paid for a pair of shoes is $2,100.00 Dolce Gabana. Yikes!
________
I hope my story of “The Climb” inspires someone on the blog or, their children. Unemployment is a fallacy – I you can’t find a job – CREATE ONE!
“If your job is to sweep the streets – then, become the best street sweeper that ever lived.”
- drmaryeb -
brigadier
May 31st, 2012
12:39 pm
high-sider,
are u more of a jamal crawford fan than a hawks fan or no?
newkid
May 31st, 2012
12:42 pm
A first order chump. Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving group of owners.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
12:43 pm
Severed!
“Kevin Everett fractured and dislocated his spinal cord and is now walking again. I don’t know if that is the same thing as “severed” though.” – Najeh Davenpoop -
_______
Poop, I do not know of Kevin Everett? But, sounds like he fractured the vertebrae that houses and protects the spinal cord. The displacement of the spinal cord is bad but, to severe is to cut, like with scissors. Once the gray matter inside the cord is cut – the body does not repair or replace those neural cells. There is no possibility of healing at this point, the damage to the spinal cord is permanent and irreversible.
Sounds like Kevin was God Lucky and, probably sustained a bruised spinal cord that could heal itself with rest and, eventually, physical therapy to the surrounding ligaments and muscles that became atrophied from disuse.
Hey Poop, thanks for sharing that story with us and, broadening this conversation. This blog is amazing because of insightful and intellectual people like you.
Just Joe
May 31st, 2012
12:46 pm
Strange that Sund hasn’t talked to Josh yet. No wonder Josh doesn’t feel valued.
Golden State wanting a forward: Rudy Gay, Iguodala, Granger, Batum, Josh….
I guess their plan is to offer Richard Jefferson, Dorell Wright & the 7th pick. They don’t have cap space. They’re not trading Bogut. Noone wants Lee’s contract. Noone wants Biedrin’s contract. Not sure how they’re pulling this one off. They own the 7th, 30th, 35th, and 52nd picks.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
12:47 pm
Poop!
Also, Ice applied to the spine is critical care within five minutes of bruising and swelling to the cord. Ice and steroids is the BEST way to treat spinal cord injuries in football.
ICE, ICE, ICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! …. is the first thing a sports physician should do until paramedics arrive and the patient is back boarded with a C-Collar (neck brace) for ER transport and a CT-Scan can be done to assess damage. ICE, ICE, ICE, ICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
12:48 pm
NEVER HEAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ICE!
falCans
May 31st, 2012
12:50 pm
First things first WE MUST GET A PASSING PG!!! That would end all our offensive woes. We have the personnel to space the floor but Teague CAMT PASS. he can’t run the pick and roll so Josh has to stay on the perimeter. Think what could be if we had a point guard to dish on multiple pick n rolls with Al and Josh. WERE IN THE ECF if we had a true point guard. Keep Teague maybe even as the starter but his minutes must b limited unless he learns to get others involved
cp
May 31st, 2012
12:50 pm
Its no reason to even interview Sund anymore. This front office is just pathetic. I guess the Hawks will be trading down now and picking up some cash considerations.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
1:01 pm
Ghost!
“Strange that Sund hasn’t talked to Josh yet. No wonder Josh doesn’t feel valued.” – just joe -
______
At first, I thought the same as you. Then, I thought – Josh probably went ghost. If he did, that is a bad sign of things to come and his commitment level to The Hawks. What I found interesting though, is that Sund has been talking to Mr. Smith instead?
Hmmm … what does that tell you?
Just Joe
O’Brien
Najeh
Grand – Daddy
KevinM
Astro Joe
What do you guys take from Sund talking to Daddy instead of Josh?
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
1:05 pm
FalCans said this:
“First things first WE MUST GET A PASSING PG!!! That would end all our offensive woes. We have the personnel to space the floor but Teague CAMT PASS. he can’t run the pick and roll so Josh has to stay on the perimeter. Think what could be if we had a point guard to dish on multiple pick n rolls with Al and Josh. WERE IN THE ECF if we had a true point guard. Keep Teague maybe even as the starter but his minutes must b limited unless he learns to get others involved”
_____________
N I C E!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FalCans, so, would you take a PG with that first pick @ #23, MOVE UP to #17, or take: Andrew Nicholson @ 6′9″ PF/C who has the size of Lamar Odom and the skills of Melo … to play SF here?
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
1:06 pm
& trade for a Ramon Sessions?
Astro Joe
May 31st, 2012
1:15 pm
Mary, Sund talking to Mr. Smith suggests to me that Josh wasn’t around and that Mr. Smith has a significant role in where Josh signs his next contract. I kind of doubt that the NJ GM is talking to Deron Williams’ parents, but who knows? Lastly, they must have felt like they already knew Josh’s thoughts regarding LD’s return.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
1:24 pm
Cornhole!
I have a picture of mine on the Internet!
*blush*
DePort
May 31st, 2012
1:26 pm
Hawks were in the same situation in the 90s … we had mookie and steve smith and we were getting to the playoffs and just couldnt get past the bulls… we blew up the team and we were bottom dwellers for the next ten years or so… So what makes you all think its going to be any different this time? We get rid of Joe .. and Josh.. or any combination and we will be a lottery team for another ten years! I atleast have false hope every year .. its better than knowing you will never win!
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
1:37 pm
DMB, I actually don’t see much wrong with Sund talking to Josh’s father. The difference between Josh and most NBA players is he is actually from Atlanta, so his family lives here. With his injury, I could actually see Josh leaving a few days after the Hawks were eliminated to goto LA to began rehabbing.
Mr.Stokes
May 31st, 2012
1:41 pm
The Hawks should keep the 23rd pick and draft Fab Melo if he is available the guy is 7′0 250 and he is a great defensive player already but he needs work on his offensive game.
Just Joe
May 31st, 2012
1:47 pm
To me, it depends on who called the meeting (between Sund & Josh’s dad), or was it just by chance that the two talked.
Did Sund have to reach out to dad because Josh went MIA after the season (pissed because “we’re not still playing”…pissed because the roster should have been deeper…pissed because Al got more publicity…pissed because Joe makes $7M+ more a year than him…pissed because he reads this blog…I could go on)?
Did Josh’s dad call the meeting because he’s ready to make something happen (big pay day or new team for his son)?
Tank
May 31st, 2012
1:49 pm
I got a question, was Rick Sund on Seattle when they traded Ray Allen to Boston? And also, his answers seemed like he has read this blog, because I have never heard anyone from management mention championship in a sentence.
Astro Joe
May 31st, 2012
1:52 pm
Tank, I’m pretty sure that Sund traded Ray Allen to Milwaukee.
falcans
May 31st, 2012
1:53 pm
The problem with bringing in a 7 footer (unless hes on the bench) is what to do with Josh and Al? Josh has no business at the 3 as a starter. and he is more valuable at the 4 than Al (better scorer more upside rebounds shots blocked!) But Al at the 5 is a mismatch offensively against anybody!!. he is essential in clearing the lane for LD motion offense. Our best bet is to aqcuiere a passing pg. Teagur cant score consistently like a werstbrook so his scoring prowess doesnt ov3r ride his inept passing. How bout teagues brother in the 2nd round. Not as quick as big brother but more level headed better mid range juper better passer
Astro Joe
May 31st, 2012
1:55 pm
Oops, had that backwards, Sund traded Gary Payton (franchise legend at the time) for Ray Allen.
Slimpg
May 31st, 2012
1:56 pm
Jeff Teague $2,433,076
Joe Johnson $19,752,645
Josh Smith $13,200,000
Al Horford $12,000,000
Zaza Pachulia $5,248,750
Kirk Hinrich – $3.5 million annually for 3 years. Pretty sure you could get Jason Kidd for that much.
Orlando Johnson (buy/trade into this pick) or Alex Young – rookie deal = $473,604 (42nd from Suns)
Marvin Williams $8,287,500
Ivan Johnson – minimum – $880K?
Fab Melo – rookie Deal
Janero Pargo – vet min – $880K?
Al Thornton – vet min – $880K?
Erick Dampier – vet min – only if in shape.2012-2013
1st unit
Jeff Teague | Joe Johnson | Josh Smith | Al Horford |Zaza Pachulia |
2nd unit
Kirk Hinrich| Alex Young | Marvin Williams | Ivan Johnson | Fab Melo |
reserves
Al Thornton; Janero Pargo ; trimmed down Erick Dampier
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
1:56 pm
PULPIT!
“Mary, Sund talking to Mr. Smith suggests to me that Josh wasn’t around and that Mr. Smith has a significant role in where Josh signs his next contract. I kind of doubt that the NJ GM is talking to Deron Williams’ parents, but who knows? Lastly, they must have felt like they already knew Josh’s thoughts regarding LD’s return.” – Astro Joe -
____________
PREACH!!!! TABERNACLE!!!!
Just Joe
May 31st, 2012
2:13 pm
Thinking about a GSW / Josh trade….Josh Smith, #43 & future 2nd for Biedrins, #7, #30 & #35???
The 7th pick (I think its 7th)…you know that Davis, MKG, Beal & Robinson will be gone. So you’d have a shot at one of Drummand, Lamb, Barnes, Henson or Jones.
The 30th & 35th picks…Kevin Murphy & Orlando Johnson (Isn’t that the kid’s last name from UCSB???). He just measured out at about 6′5″ with a 6′11″ wingspan. 34″ vertical. Nice jumper.
Harrison Barnes, Tony Wroten, Kevin Murphy & Orlando Johnson.
J. Teague / T. Wroten
J. Johnson / K. Murphy / O. Johnson
H. Barnes / M. Williams
A. Horford / I. Johnson
Z. Pachulia / A. Biedrins
I think this is getting closer to what LD wants to see. You’ve got good size & shooting ability on the wings with Johnson, Murphy, Johnson, Barnes & Marvin….fast, athletic PG’s (Wroten needs to work on that right hand)…and some size up front with the MLE still to use on a center.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
2:20 pm
“Thinking about a GSW / Josh trade….Josh Smith, #43 & future 2nd for Biedrins, #7, #30 & #35???”
That is a better trade if you remove Biedrins. I want no part of that guy. His contract and production are worse than Marvin.
Hopefully if the Hawks do that they can manage to package some of those picks and move up. From what little I have seen and know of those five players you mentioned, Drummond seems like he’d be the best choice based on his position and what I have seen and heard about him.
I wonder what the Warriors’ plans are though. They have Richard Jefferson, David Lee, and Andrew Bogut locked into long term deals at the 3-4-5 positions. If they get a forward, who are they going to move and what can they get for them? None of those players’ trade value is particularly high.
Facts Baby Facts
May 31st, 2012
2:21 pm
If we are to get to the championship level of competition instead of the backwards progress since Mike Woodson left 4 things must happen.
1)Sund has got to go
2) Michael Cunningham has got to go
3)Al Horford has got to go
4) The hawks have got to get a true center to complement Josh and JJ
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
2:23 pm
Barnes is another Marvin Williams. And this is coming from a UNC fan.
Facts Baby Facts
May 31st, 2012
2:27 pm
“Josh has no business at the 3 as a starter. and he is more valuable at the 4 than Al (better scorer more upside rebounds shots blocked!) But Al at the 5 is a mismatch offensively against anybody!!. he is essential in clearing the lane for LD motion offense. Our best bet is to aqcuiere a passing pg. Teagur cant score consistently like a werstbrook so his scoring prowess doesnt ov3r ride his inept passing. How bout teagues brother in the 2nd round.” – quote of the day.
Everybody and his brother knows this is the truth. Al is the weak link and Josh is a strength on the front line.
Time for Al to go. Hell Its been time.
Slimpg
May 31st, 2012
2:27 pm
RE: falcans
“Josh Smith has no business as a starter at SF”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzOzVSsifCo
Then the Hawks have no business fronting like they are an NBA team. Thats the game with OKC Smith mixed in SF to counter Durant, and its been employed against the major teams.
It shoouldve been employed vs the Celtics but there was no depth (Zaza)
It brings toughness, it brings rebounding, and it brings a taller consistent shooter (Horford) to the elbow.
Smith will never be a consistent superstar PF, and he lives and dies by that elbow PF jumper.
So its no reason to set his position in stone. SFs come in all shapes sizes and styles.
And if Smith turns into a 14ppg defensive rebounder and playmaker like Iguodala. Then the Hawks are elite with that
MistaGamer
May 31st, 2012
2:29 pm
Najeh,
Nicely summed up!
What kind of idiots do we have running this organization, and more importantly, what kind of idiots do they take the paying customer for?
falcans
May 31st, 2012
2:30 pm
i woulda traded the aging gary for ray Allen. Mite have been best move hes ever made lol. Only a idiot would trade Josh Smith. Al Horford and Marvin Williams and a draft pick for D Howard. Id take my chances that the Atlanta Native and a re energized fan base would be enough to make him sign long term. Plus he nd Josh would be the best frontcourt (defensively) since The Admiral and the big fundamental!!
Facts Baby Facts
May 31st, 2012
2:30 pm
If we are to get to the championship level of competition instead of the backwards progress since Mike Woodson left 4 things must happen.
1)Sund has got to go.
2) Michael Cunningham has got to go.
3)Al Horford has got to go.
4) The hawks have got to get a true center to complement Josh and JJ.
Facts Baby Facts
May 31st, 2012
2:32 pm
Teague doesnt start or get major minutes on most of the top 13 teams…. So what does that tell you about teague?
tidog
May 31st, 2012
2:34 pm
Barnes is way more skilled than Marvin. He handles the rock better and is capable of creating his shot a lot better than Marvin. The whole Sports Talk Radio is amazed at the No Call on the Rondo ’s layup at the end of the game. They also seem amazed that Lebron goes to the line 29 times and the Celtics go 24. Ray Allen whining about the no call in an interview. Welcome the the Hawks World.
newkid
May 31st, 2012
2:35 pm
The long-term prospects for the centers likely to be in the ‘13 draft appear to be a bit better than the ‘12 crop. Moving Josh, Joe, and/or Marvin this year should be done with an eye toward positioning for one of the ‘13 centers.
tidog
May 31st, 2012
2:39 pm
There’s a long athletic center out of Gonzaga, Robert “something or another” could be a nice fit.
falcans
May 31st, 2012
2:40 pm
slimpg@ josh career avg 16 ppg 8rpg 4asst 2blks…. he is iguadala without the publicity. 2nd I have no idea why everybody is so hard on Josh with the jumpers… he has a better average than kobe (this year) and the reason he is on the perimeter is #1 we cant run a pick n roll. #2 he is able to blow by defenders if HE CAN GET THE BALL BEFORE THE SHOT CLOCK IS EXPIRING #3 because LD uses him as a 3 to appease Al and give him the illusion he is a 4. put smith at the 4 and let him play like a 4 he is a top 5 PF. How many times have u seen a play called for Josh in the post… high or low??? @ facts baby facts, Horford can ball he is just overrated and needs to take a back seat to Josh ,JJ , and Teague if can learn to consistently hit those floaters lol nevermind Trade AL
Smoke Weed Every Day
May 31st, 2012
2:42 pm
“And if Smith turns into a 14ppg defensive rebounder and playmaker like Iguodala. Then the Hawks are elite with that” – Idiot
Smith career?
8rbs 2blks 15pts 3ast
This year?
9.6rbs,2blk 18.8pts 3ast
Why would we want to take backwards steps to appease some idiot.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
2:42 pm
I don’t know how people think.JT has proven to be a good defensive PG. his turnover rate is very low,he plays under control,his outside shooting isn’t bad.He has to deal with a situation where isi Joe brings the offense to a stop & Josh does what ever he wants to do. He is often in the game with KH who try’s to play PG. He was essentially a rookie,he is the only hawk who is capable of driving to the hoop & yet people talk about replacing him with a rookie or some one like Sessions. JT is not the problem with this team,it’s LD.
northcyde
May 31st, 2012
2:42 pm
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
11:17 am
“Marvin [Williams] shot the 3-pointer pretty good.”
Take a look at his numbers against playoff teams Mr. Sund. It might surprise you. SMH
****************************
Marvin was 17 – 46 from 3 vs Eastern Conference playoff teams ( 37% )
Marvin was 6 – 16 from 3 vs Western Conference playoff teams ( 38% )
Marvin was 23 – 62 total from 3 vs NBA playoff teams ( 37% )
(( shrug ))
Not great, but not nearly as bad as people would want to believe.
Having said that, Sund is incredible with his spin doctoring.
falcans
May 31st, 2012
2:45 pm
YEA TEAGUE IS SOOOO OVERRATED. he is young so can be coached but he is a poutter and all he has is quickness. he is not a starter yet by any means. he is not a floor general and lacks confidence
Non Partial
May 31st, 2012
2:47 pm
Al is the laziest defender on the team and his offense isnt good either. You actually have to stop the motion of the offense to run plays to help Al score. Pick and rolls are for players who cant create, Like Al. Al has 1 shot and thats iffy. Thats why he averages 12pts a game. (almost all his life). He just doesnt have the tools.
College career average 12pts
Pro career average 12pts
All star (LOL) 5pts
Playoffs 10pts
Al Just doesnt have what it takes to help the hawks offensively and is too lazy and soft defensively
Grandad
May 31st, 2012
2:47 pm
Najeh
On Gasol;
My points are valid as are yours.
We both obviously feel strongly about our positions.
I do not wish to get into the:
back & forth;
`’Jamal type debate that constantly rages on this blog`’.
I will not concede … but I know you should not back down either.
My point;
The difference in our opinion is so miniscule [I believe]
that it would be time consuming for us to continue.
The debate being:
Gasol elite or just really good ?
It`s not as if we are debating Wilt Chamberlain vs Cal Bowdler ?
My respect for your tenacity,
and knowing my stubborness … could lead to a summer of …
endlessness !
point, counterpoint, point, counterpoint, … stalemate …………
My final absolute point = Sund is obtuse !
Black Man
May 31st, 2012
2:52 pm
Non Partial Thats true. there is no way we get better with Al on the front Line. I easily trade Al for a high draft pick or a real center. Al brings nothing but arguments to the team.
Astro Joe
May 31st, 2012
2:54 pm
Agreed disagreement? On this blog? What’s next, the ASG use a portion of the MLE on Marcus Camby?
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
2:56 pm
Gasol is no big upgrade over JS
@ falcans I don’t think you have watched many hawk games. You probably think KH is better than JT. Put any PG into this hawk’s team. He would have major problems running this team with JJ & JS in the lineup & with LD as the coach.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
2:58 pm
And that would’ve a fact not an opinion.
JM
May 31st, 2012
2:58 pm
Dr. Mary, is there anything on the horizon with stem cell and spinal rejuvenation? I ride as well and everytime there is a story like William’s, my wife (one of those physcians that calls people like me organ donors) get on my case about giving it up.
JM
May 31st, 2012
2:59 pm
I asked her and she thinks any possible stem cell use is years if not decades away. any thoughts?
Mike
May 31st, 2012
3:00 pm
@falcans and Non Partial
Okay, I bite since I am a nice guy, say that the Hawks did trade Al away, do you think that Josh will stay? Answer No, because some team will overpay Josh no matter what and if we did signed him, it is going to be at max, that means you are going two players with max contacts, not going to happen.
Right now, i think this team is going try to get sold again (lack of commitment, alot of contacts (Zsa and Teague) is up next year, Marvin and his option, this is straight out caretaker mode.
JM
May 31st, 2012
3:01 pm
I wanted Pau before he got to LA, but now I’m not sure he is worth a major player. Too old. Marvin yes, Joe maybe. Josh, Al or Teague NO!.
northcyde
May 31st, 2012
3:01 pm
Slimpg
May 31st, 2012
2:27 pm
RE: falcans
“Josh Smith has no business as a starter at SF”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzOzVSsifCo
Then the Hawks have no business fronting like they are an NBA team. Thats the game with OKC Smith mixed in SF to counter Durant, and its been employed against the major teams.
It shoouldve been employed vs the Celtics but there was no depth (Zaza)
It brings toughness, it brings rebounding, and it brings a taller consistent shooter (Horford) to the elbow.
Smith will never be a consistent superstar PF, and he lives and dies by that elbow PF jumper.
So its no reason to set his position in stone. SFs come in all shapes sizes and styles.
And if Smith turns into a 14ppg defensive rebounder and playmaker like Iguodala. Then the Hawks are elite with that
***********************
????????
In the vid that you posted, Josh Smith is playing the 4 the vast majority of the time, and was far more effective playing the 4 than when he played the 3. And it’s not even close.
Josh Smith played the 3 in that game for about a grand total of 4 minutes. Yet, you’re trying to pass that off as if he could play the 3 full time at the level he plays the 4?
The only way I want to see Josh Smith playing the 3 on this team, is if we have another C or PF who is highly efficient at that spot.
falcans
May 31st, 2012
3:03 pm
@Rusty Teague is all of those things BUT he cant pass. It would be different if he was a consistent scorer to off set the fact he gets no one else involved, but hes not. ALL year long we hear how “stagnant” the offense was….. as talented as we are this is unacceptable. he lacks leadership and confidence. He is not the answer. is he a bum?? not by any means but the answer to our woes???c’mon man
doc
May 31st, 2012
3:03 pm
nice attempt there mc to get some depth.
has anyone ever known people that just seem coated with teflon, no matter what is thrown at them nothing sticks and made of pure plastic? he has got it down. likeable yes, probably pretty much fun talking about the old days and someone who you could have along conversation with but walk away knowing you have learned nothing. my boy rick has it.
Fundamentals
May 31st, 2012
3:08 pm
Sund interview sums up how our team is officially run. No leadership, no direction, no willingness to take on the challenge. We did great! BUT you’ll have to ask someone else for some real answers, I just stop where the bar was set. To get any higher, you’ll need someone else to answer your questions.
TOTAL BS …. again.
DawgNole
May 31st, 2012
3:10 pm
SUND: “I think Larry and the team did a great job.”
A Round 1 exit in the playoffs is a “great job”? Please!
Until this city’s pro teams can obliterate that manner of thinking, there will be NO championships here (95 Braves notwithstanding).
falcans
May 31st, 2012
3:11 pm
lol can you really read my comments and say i dont watch games lol woooow. A pg is like a QB. The good to great ones dont succumb to their diva wr wants. The pg has to be the general. If he cant get the respect needed to do so from his teammates THEN HE IS NOT THE ANSWER!!! Regardless of percieved talent. Or are you suggesting @rusty- that we gut our team and start over with Teague??? lol yea someone doesnt watch and its not me
White Man
May 31st, 2012
3:11 pm
Gasol > Al
Bynum>Al
D12 >Al
Josh> AL
Zaza> Al
Ivan >AL
Al > collins
Al > Dampier
northcyde
May 31st, 2012
3:17 pm
Personally, I think it speaks volumes that Sund hasn’t done an exit interview with Josh yet. That’s the one person I’d want to get in first, to try to assess if he still wants to be here or not. This organization has to get a gauge on whether Smith can be retained . . and if he wants to come back in the first place.
LOL @ talking to his daddy, rather than to the player himself.
Maybe MC needs to do an exclusive interview with Josh Smith’s father.
Great interview by MC. He asked all of the right questions in this. Sund’s indecisive azz kills me.
MC: Will you try to sign Josh Smith to an extension?
Sund: I’m not going to get into contract stuff.
LOL . . he said that like this isn’t the biggest decision the Hawks have to make this offseason. Like he doesn’t have direct involvement in the process.
O'Brien
May 31st, 2012
3:19 pm
DMB,
I think Ra’mon Sessions has a player option for $4.5 mil, so he could decide to become a FA.
As for Rick talking to Mr. Smith, I think Josh will listen closely to what his Dad has to say when its time to sign another contract. To me, it is surprising that Josh and other players have not had their exit interviews yet, since their season ended on 5/10 (almost 3 weeks ago).
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
3:19 pm
Falcans I diagree with you, it’s not JT’s fault,LD let’s Joe & Josh to dominate the offense which leads to bad shots & a complete stop to the flow when JJ plays iso & LD is forever in JT’s ear critizing him & giving him mixed signals what he expects. When JT scores well he tells him he needs to get the stars the ball,when he try’s that he is told that he’ s not being aggressive enough. I think that this boils down to the fact that JT has made him look bad.I think that if LD had his way KH would be playing PG but he can’t do that because the fans know that JT is way better. Look at what’s happened toIvan & TMac.
High-sider
May 31st, 2012
3:20 pm
@brigadier
brigadier
May 31st, 2012
12:39 pm
high-sider,
are u more of a jamal crawford fan than a hawks fan or no?
———————————————————————-
For the sake of political correctness, I am a Hawks fan, first, and a Jamal Crawford fan, second.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
3:21 pm
I really think that Sessions was the weak link against the thunder.
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
3:25 pm
“Marvin was 17 – 46 from 3 vs Eastern Conference playoff teams ( 37% )
Marvin was 6 – 16 from 3 vs Western Conference playoff teams ( 38% )
Marvin was 23 – 62 total from 3 vs NBA playoff teams ( 37% )
(( shrug ))
Not great, but not nearly as bad as people would want to believe.
Having said that, Sund is incredible with his spin doctoring.”
My Calculations say 17-50 vs. Eastern conference playoff teams for 34%
6-16 vs western confernce playoff teams for 38%
23-66 for 34.8 % vs playoffs teams all while being left wide open. I agree not great.
DawgNole
May 31st, 2012
3:26 pm
PMC
May 31st, 2012
11:33 am
This team has done absolutely nothing of consequence since the team was blown up and rebuilt (poorly under Knight and Woody.
_______________________
Actually, it’s been a lot longer than that. Try since 1968.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
3:30 pm
Falcan you say that PG should just takeover the leadership of the team,hell, Woody & LD wouldn’t even let him play for 2 years. LD would rather let a washed up MB play who couldn’t defend against his grandmother. If JT tried to stand up against LD he would never see the floor,look what happen to TMac & Ivan.
DawgNole
May 31st, 2012
3:31 pm
Bdfshjdf
May 31st, 2012
10:47 am
Nice interview, thanks for taking it up a notch and jabbing him with a few critical questions MC, you did a good job.
_____________________
Nothing wrong with the questions, but did you notice that whenever MC bore down or persisted, Sund cut him off and deferred to others. That’s what corporate mouthpieces tend to do–especially those with loser mentality.
White Man
May 31st, 2012
3:37 pm
Josh and JJ did well running the offense. Teague will never be a star quality Point Guard and cant quarterback this team
Package him and Al and lets get a center and a point guard. !.
White Man
May 31st, 2012
3:39 pm
“hell, Woody & LD wouldn’t even let him play for 2 years.”
Wise decisions on their parts. I see why they did not start him.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
3:42 pm
How stupid JT had a good year but idiots like white man talk bullcrap.
Rusty
May 31st, 2012
3:43 pm
White man is a whole.
Grandmaster JeJe (GM)
May 31st, 2012
3:47 pm
This Q&A is about as bad as the one with Gearon Jr. MC asked great questions.
My only takeaway is that the players think they should still be playing. So does every other team in the league. STFU and be real. You are the worst GM. You talk about being a final 2 team in the conference. Have you EVER accomplished this in your 32 years?
If Hinrich had played in that Chicago series, Teague wouldn’t have played at all. Last time I checked, Teague had a coming out party in that series – no homo. We would’ve gotten murdered with or without Hinrich. SMH
I’m surprised Sund didn’t just say:
“The goal is to win 50 games. Because if you win 50 games, you are most likely going to make the playoffs. If you make the playoffs, you have a chance of winning round 1. If you win round 1, you have a chance of going to round 2. If you win round 2, you have a chance of going to the ECF. If you win the ECF, you have a chance of going to the Finals.”
In my mock offseason, I had Gearon answering that question about Smoove and said Gearon would circumvent it. Just as Sund does here:
MC: Is it your perception Josh is still happy being here with the Hawks?
Sund: I’m going to have his exit interview sometime this week. But, yeah, when you read the things of him saying . . . He’s such a competitor. I was talking to his dad the other day, and he mentioned we all think we should be playing, and that’s great. And [Josh] is one of them.
Does Sund even answer the question MC asked? No.
northcyde
May 31st, 2012
3:55 pm
DePort
May 31st, 2012
1:26 pm
Hawks were in the same situation in the 90s … we had mookie and steve smith and we were getting to the playoffs and just couldnt get past the bulls… we blew up the team and we were bottom dwellers for the next ten years or so… So what makes you all think its going to be any different this time? We get rid of Joe .. and Josh.. or any combination and we will be a lottery team for another ten years! I atleast have false hope every year .. its better than knowing you will never win!
***********************
It’s the trades that we did that year, that led to our demise. They traded our top 2 players for inefficient offensive players
Steve Smith turned into J.R. Rider and Jimmy Jackson
Mookie Blaylock turned into 1st round pick ( Jason Terry ) and Bimbo Coles
We went from a team that was 2nd in defense . . to 25th in defense
And the offense that was bad the year before, only slightly improved numbers wise ( despite their league overall offensive ranking actually decreasing from the previous year . . from 19th to 22nd )
And that’s why the Hawks need to make the RIGHT kinds of moves when tweaking or changing this roster.
You don’t trade Josh Smith for someone who can’t at least adequately defend and rebound on the frontline. You preferably trade him for a guy who can give you above average efficiency on both the offensive and defensive ends.
You don’t trade Joe Johnson for someone who can’t defend out on the perimeter and would give up more than he can score. Even if that guy is a lesser offensive player, his defense needs to limit the guy he’s guarding.
Trading Smitty for JR and Jimmy was NOT an upgrade. Neither of those guys were going to stop anybody, and both of those guys weren’t going to get to the FT line at the rate Smitty got to it. So despite bringing in 2 offensive players, both were highly inefficient offensive players.
And don’t even get me started on the Bimbo for Mookie trade. Yeah, the 1st round pick may have been the ultimate acquisition in that deal, but the Hawks took an unnecessary step back with that trade.
That 1999 Hawks team simply needed to be tweaked. Both Mookie and Smitty were taking bad shots that year, but playing pretty good defense. Instead, the Hawks blew it up, and surrounded Dikembe with a bunch of inefficient non defense playing gunners.
And the results were disasterous. Too bad Lenny took the fall for that garbage playground team.
Sund . . . build the damn team right.
O'Brien
May 31st, 2012
3:55 pm
northcyde,
It’s hard for Sund to answer those questions when he may not be the GM next year.
Grandad
May 31st, 2012
4:01 pm
Rusty
You are correct;
(can you believe I said that)
Teaguer is our pg, unless we bring in Nash
-or-
use Jeff as trade bait.
Cut LD just a bit of slack;
he did insert him in as a starter,
brought in Van Exel as plyr devel Instrctor,
stuck with him this yr;
JT had his best yr under LD !
I still think Jeff is a natural [2].
Barbosa … Jet Terry w/o the natural jumper.
But pay attn now;
I`m your ally on this one.
cp
May 31st, 2012
4:02 pm
falcans
May 31st, 2012
2:40 pm
slimpg@ josh career avg 16 ppg 8rpg 4asst 2blks…. he is iguadala without the publicity. 2nd I have no idea why everybody is so hard on Josh with the jumpers… he has a better average than kobe (this year) and the reason he is on the perimeter is #1 we cant run a pick n roll. #2 he is able to blow by defenders if HE CAN GET THE BALL BEFORE THE SHOT CLOCK IS EXPIRING #3 because LD uses him as a 3 to appease Al and give him the illusion he is a 4. put smith at the 4 and let him play like a 4 he is a top 5 PF. How many times have u seen a play called for Josh in the post… high or low??? @ facts baby facts, Horford can ball he is just overrated and needs to take a back seat to Josh ,JJ , and Teague if can learn to consistently hit those floaters lol nevermind Trade AL
______________________________________________________________________________
Smdh. Its going to be a long offseason if there are more post like this on the blog.
O'Brien
May 31st, 2012
4:03 pm
It’s hard for Sund to answer those questions (offer Ivan, offer Josh an extension)when he may not be the GM next year, which makes it even more ironic that LD’s option was picked up so quickly.
But judging by Sund’s responses, I think he will be back next year.
And I’m with northcyde. I don’t want to trade our guys for a top 5 draft pick, only to sit back and wait 3 years for that player to develop into a young star (if we get the pick right – Marvin, Shelden still fresh in my mind). And if he does develop into a young star, what will stop him from signing with the highest FA bidder when he gets turned off by the ASG and our GM?
northcyde
May 31st, 2012
4:03 pm
Rod, you’re right. He was 17 – 50.
OK . . so he shot the 3 more like Jamal Crawford.
(( shrugs ))
northcyde
May 31st, 2012
4:04 pm
O’Brien . . exactly.
I’m seeing our “window of opportunity” being about 2 years. If they tweak the roster, bring in the right players that will improve us, or at least balance us out.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
4:07 pm
“I’m surprised Sund didn’t just say:
“The goal is to win 50 games. Because if you win 50 games, you are most likely going to make the playoffs. If you make the playoffs, you have a chance of winning round 1. If you win round 1, you have a chance of going to round 2. If you win round 2, you have a chance of going to the ECF. If you win the ECF, you have a chance of going to the Finals.””
The goal is to play basketball. If you play basketball, you have a chance to win 50 games, make the playoffs, win Round 1, win Round 2, win the ECF and win the Finals.
Mission accomplished.
Najeh Davenpoop
May 31st, 2012
4:07 pm
“I’m seeing our “window of opportunity” being about 2 years. If they tweak the roster, bring in the right players that will improve us, or at least balance us out.”
Window of opportunity to do what?
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
4:14 pm
O’Brien, would you be for trading Al for Cousins and Sac’s number 1 pick?
Slimjr
May 31st, 2012
4:18 pm
GET THIS DUDE SUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This dude is a cant miss!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L66QmiB0xj4
Slimjr
May 31st, 2012
4:20 pm
Hey DUI, were you at? Why don’t you chime in with your take on this blog? Do you have an opinion?
No?
Rod from College Park
May 31st, 2012
4:21 pm
Rod, you’re right. He was 17 – 50.
I know. Good try.
darrell starks
May 31st, 2012
4:25 pm
Melo #23 is a must for the Hawks.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Slimjr
May 31st, 2012
4:26 pm
[where]^^^^
darrell starks
May 31st, 2012
4:27 pm
STARTER TEAGUE, JOE, JOSH, HORFORD, ZAZA
BENCH PARGO, TMAC, MARVIN, IVAN, MELO
RESERVE GREEN, ?, ?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DawgNole
May 31st, 2012
4:31 pm
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
12:29 pm
I could not find work right away, so instinctively I began this SHOE SHINE Business and, landed a corporate contract to “pick up and drop off shoes in office buildings. I hired 30 some odd girls to do the physical work and, we made 50K in my first month at age 21 . . . .
My Mother was appalled that I was in Atlanta and, shining shoes? – But, no job was beneath me . . . .
_______________________
You made $50,000 in your first month? What in the world could’ve been appalling about that job?
darrell starks
May 31st, 2012
4:33 pm
You Guys and me and Horford, Josh have been screaming for the past 5 years, all of these guys are projects nothing more, take a chance on a 7′0 Melo who is tough defensively in the paint and also final get a legit 7′0 on the this team.
Every year Hawks are drafting guy’s between 6′4 and 6′10 this is getting old now, and not one player have made the team.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
brigadier
May 31st, 2012
4:34 pm
high-sider,
that explains a lot. u care more for the player jamal crawford than the hawks. that is ur choice. u dont have to be pc about it.
darrell starks
May 31st, 2012
4:41 pm
The last 7′0 drafted by the Hawks Paul Gasol in 2001 and then traded, that’s 11years now.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
brigadier
May 31st, 2012
4:41 pm
crawford isnt in their league. crawford is similar to a jr smith type of player
brigadier
May 31st, 2012
4:46 pm
high-sider,
did u follow hawks before crawford came to team and do u follow since he left?what is the euphoria with him since u said u fav players were mark price and mullin?
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
4:49 pm
Starks, I thought Collier was a 7′0.
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
5:00 pm
Nevermind that was 2000, and Milwaukee drafted him.
Just Joe
May 31st, 2012
6:07 pm
Orlando Johnson – 6′5″ 205 lb SG from UCSB with a 6′11″ wingspan & 34″ no step vertical. Shot 42.7% from 3, scored 19.7 pts & grabbed 5.8 rebounds per game.
Kevin Murphy – 6′7″ 195 lb SG from Tenn Tech with 6′7″ wingspan & 27.8″ no step vertical. Shot 41.6% from 3, scored 20.6 pts & grabbed 5.2 rebounds per game.
I’m greedy. Draft both of these guys!!!
falcans
May 31st, 2012
6:14 pm
@ CP What about Smooves production do you not agree with?? That LD keeps him on the perimeter?? That we cant run the pick n roll or Josh career stats?? exactly
@Rusty Hinrich gets the nod because he is willing to be unpopular in the locker room. Obviously he is older now but he still commands respect as a proven VET. I guess I prefer my PG to DEMAND AND COMMAND. Seeing how neither one of us can speak on what LD is saying behind closed doors I can only go by what I see. It is plausible that LD is holding him back but its also possible he sees what I see on the court. Im talking intangibles. He has no presence. whose fault it is doesnt matter really. With that said I am not willing to trade Teague for at least another 2 years. He can gain confidence but im not so sure bout his horrendous floor vision. I mean u must admit Teague NEVER DISHES ON FAST BREAKS….. Even with Wilkins reincarnated (lol) Josh waiting for a alley oop
HImdownstairs
May 31st, 2012
6:19 pm
Don’t look forward to the hawks having a “state of the franchise ” meeting like the Falcons. These guys might as well run the franchise as if it has a clearance sign from Walmart on them. They are low budget owners that are content with whatever production the team produces as long as the larger return goes into their pockets.
ryan
May 31st, 2012
6:22 pm
This team is like Groundhog day its keeps doing the same thing over and over Gearon really is the one that’s the GM not Sund its sucks that it seems nothing will change in our life time with the Hawks .
O"Brien
May 31st, 2012
6:23 pm
From jeff schultz;
Sund is considering retirement. Do you know what some say when an athlete is considering retirement? He already has checked out. The same belief should apply to coaches and team executives.
In all likelihood, no matter what Sund chooses to do, he will remain with the Hawks through the draft. He still has the downtown office on Marietta Street. He will attend an NBA draft combine this weekend. He will be the Hawks’ executive talking to other general managers about players who potentially might be available in trade.
Sund goes into this Hawks’ offseason as both a possible lame duck and their primary makeover artist — a bad combination.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/2012/05/31/rick-sund-shouldnt-be-making-decisions-for-hawks/?cxntfid=blogs_jeff_schultz_blog/
High-sider
May 31st, 2012
6:29 pm
@brigadier
brigadier
May 31st, 2012
4:46 pm
high-sider,
did u follow hawks before crawford came to team and do u follow since he left?what is the euphoria with him since u said u fav players were mark price and mullin?
————————————————————
I followed the Hawks prior to Jamal Crawford coming to the team but I followed the Hawks more after Crawford became a team member of the Hawks. Crawford has a “smooth,” finesse offensive game with a very good to “pure” shooting touch. Crawford is a hybrid [cross] between a “pure” shooter and “pure” scorer who has the propensity to make difficult or “clutch” shots with a certain of amount regularity which the opposition has [come] to respect and must account [for].
doc
May 31st, 2012
6:53 pm
o’b , i am sure this didnt fly over your head either where the most telling and the most important and incriminating part of the schultz’ article was how this limbo state was known at least to us and the press as early as december of 2011 and NOTHING has been done. as he said it isnt like they couldnt put together a prime list of the young studs out there and immediately start preparing to hire one of them as soon as available rather than wait on sund to make a decision. these guys are always waiting to not make a decision even when one is imminent.
doc
May 31st, 2012
6:56 pm
dmb, you sure all those girls wee doing is shining shoes baby. it is good to share in the profits but of what? maybe that is what chilled mom’s affection to your plan.
Artman
May 31st, 2012
6:59 pm
I have to admit I really don’t understand the owners. Building a winning franchise does not require one to be a rocket scientist. The plan is really simple.
What is the best organization in the NBA? It is clearly San Antonio. All the owners need to do is to hire the second in charge in San Antonio as GM and let him
establish the culture and run the organization. Let him hire the coach. When the Seattle Sonics moved to Oklahoma City, they followed this plan. Look at them now. And
yet the owners of the Hawks hire Rick sund as GM. They hire Larry Drew as coach. Are they studpid or do they just not care? It was understood when they hired Rick Sund
as an interim GM, he was here to maintain until the lawsuits were settled, and apparently sell the Hawks. So why is he here? Are they expecting the light bulb to turn
on and suddenly he will become a genius GM? The owners are content with mediocrity. Everything else is just pure PR.
Last summer, if they had any clue at all, they could have hired Rick Adelman as coach. He was a proven winner. They did nothing.
I was giddy when I thought we had a new owner. Nothing was certain but at least there was a possibility of the new owner doing the smart thing. However we know how that went.
The only thing that might possibly make sense is that the ASG is still trying to sell the Hawks and have settled on the status quo until they find a buyer. The Hawks are becoming the Clippers of the east. Look at them. They have Chris Paul, Blake Griffin, etc and look like they might have a chance at a serious run for the money. But what did they do, they brought back Vinny Del Negro back as coach. I’m sure the Clipper fans are furious. They could easily have Jerry Sloan or some other proven winner as a coach. What the frog?
We can talk about players until the end of time but without a solid organization and culture, the Hawks will only be mediocre. If the owners are still try to sell the Hawks, let us know so at least we can have some hope. Until the ASG is gone or the light bulb to a winner franchise suddenly goes on, how can any reasonable fan expect any possibility of ever having the possibility of competing for the championship?
Artman
May 31st, 2012
7:00 pm
Obviously my previous post did not format properly. I hope it is readable.
doc
May 31st, 2012
7:30 pm
meanwhile one ex-atlanta franchise hires another ex-coach from another ex-atlanta hockey franchise; as the world turns. ex-thrasher coach hartley is going to the flames in calgary. hartley was the only experienced coach the spirit hired ever in their years here for either hockey or bball and he delivered. however, they sent him packing as he knew more about what a team needed rather than stars as he refused to give into their whims. they fired him to never sniff another playoff again thinking it might help get them a star to sign, meanwhile the star? he dumped them because they didnt have a coach nor a capable and competent gm who could put a team together. go figure, and ya think josh will stay? fools if you do.
why oh why the basg? you know rod, i am right.
PD
May 31st, 2012
7:39 pm
this is so sad to read. Just do a Billy Knight if you’re not going to answer questions.
doc
May 31st, 2012
7:51 pm
pd, so right one a mute, the other teflon coated answers that say nothing.
BILLY KNIGHT
May 31st, 2012
8:00 pm
Just do a Billy Knight if you’re not going to answer guestions.
Slimjr
May 31st, 2012
8:01 pm
Jeff Schultz
Rick Sund shouldn’t be making decisions for Hawks
2:45 pm May 31, 2012, by Jeff Schultz
Rick Sund will decide on his future soon, but Hawks should be hiring another decision-maker. (Jason Getz/AJC)
Rick Sund will decide on his future soon, but Hawks should be hiring another decision-maker. (Jason Getz/AJC)
“As early as next week, the Hawks will make an announcement on the status of Rick Sund. Maybe he comes back as general manager. Maybe he comes back as team president. Maybe he comes back as consultant, spiritual adviser, GM Emeritus and VP of Deflecting Blame for the Joe Johnson Contract.
Doesn’t really matter what he decides. It’s a problem.
Sund is considering retirement. Do you know what some say when an athlete is considering retirement? He already has checked out. The same belief should apply to coaches and team executives.
In all likelihood, no matter what Sund chooses to do, he will remain with the Hawks through the draft. He still has the downtown office on Marietta Street. He will attend an NBA draft combine this weekend. He will be the Hawks’ executive talking to other general managers about players who potentially might be available in trade.” -Jeff S.-
Agree, this dude should be kicking rocks!
44/2056
ntrigue
May 31st, 2012
8:03 pm
All bull crap….I can say a million questions that I wanted asked but it really doesn’t matter because he would have gave a dumb answer. Like Larry drew with his substitution patterns or his lack of presence defending his team against bad calls by refs or running ISO plays for Joe when the regular offense is working fine and then ISO plays just kill any momentum we had
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
May 31st, 2012
9:04 pm
Excuses Excuses
Slimjr
May 31st, 2012
9:21 pm
“Once the gray matter inside the cord is cut – the body does not repair or replace those neural cells.”- drmaryb-
drmaryb, maybe there is a way to repair the cord? The healthy body operates at a voltage between -25millivolts and -20millivolts.. Why not apply that voltage to the cord so those cells get a “jump start”, start to regenerate and possibly repair/restore the cord? I bet our military is already doing this?
There’s a book that’s been around since 1998 that I have to get my hands on..Its called:
“The Body Electric: Electromagnetism And The Foundation Of Life by Robert Becker and Gary Selden (Jul 22, 1998)”
“The Body Electric tells the fascinating story of our bioelectric selves. Robert O. Becker, a pioneer in the filed of regeneration and its relationship to electrical currents in living things, challenges the established mechanistic understanding of the body. He found clues to the healing process in the long-discarded theory that electricity is vital to life. But as exciting as Becker’s discoveries are, pointing to the day when human limbs, spinal cords, and organs may be regenerated after they have been damaged, equally fascinating is the story of Becker’s struggle to do such original work. The Body Electric explores new pathways in our understanding of evolution, acupuncture, psychic phenomena, and healing.”
Slimjr
May 31st, 2012
9:37 pm
Another book to get is: “Healing is Voltage” by Dr Jerry L. Tennant copyright 2010
He states that in order for a healthy body to make new cells it steps up the voltage to -50millivolts? Hmmmm
brigadierjerry
May 31st, 2012
9:54 pm
High-Sider,
So you really arent a fan of the Hawks team per se, but more a fan of individual players, correct?
Also, which is more important to you to be a fan of a player or a fan of a team??
Do you reside in Ga or some other state?Also, did you become a fan of the Trailblazers when Jamal got on the team?
Clarification
May 31st, 2012
10:11 pm
“Crawford has a “smooth,” finesse offensive game with a very good to “pure” shooting touch.”
Very good to “pure” is 40%???? LMFAO. You have “very” low standards.
O"Brien
May 31st, 2012
10:22 pm
doc,
The problem is the ASG want a ‘yes man’ for their GM.
If it was up to me, my list would of possibleGM replacements would include Thunder vice president and assistant general manager Troy Weaver, Spurs assistant GM Dennis Lindsey, and Oklahoma City’s assistant GM Rob Hennigan, who came into the league with the Spurs.
It is interesting to note that Portland wanted to talk to Rick Sund (who still has a home in the NW), and the ASG told them no. I remember when 2 of our assistant coaches (including LD) wanted to go somewhere else, and they were told no.
O"Brien
May 31st, 2012
10:34 pm
Ra’mon,
I like the trade, but I’m not sure I would do it for a couple reasons. 1) Is Cousins a center or PF (Sacramento played him at PF later in the year),and we already have Josh at PF. 2) I don’t want to trade Al this season, and then watch Josh walk away next season.
Question for you. Would you trade Josh for Cousins and the #5 pick?
WHEN ARE THEY MOVING ?????
May 31st, 2012
10:39 pm
QUESTION OF ALL IS… WHEN WILL YOU BE IN SEATTLE OR SOMEWHERE ELSE ?
IT IS WAY PAST TIME THIS FRANCHISE MOVED OUT OF ATLANTA, THEY ARE A COMPLETE WASTE OF EVERYONE’S TIME !!!!
GO AWAY hawks, ONCE AND FOR ALL !!!!
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
10:43 pm
Ride or Die Chick!
“Dr. Mary, is there anything on the horizon with stem cell and spinal rejuvenation? I ride as well and everytime there is a story like William’s, my wife (one of those physcians that calls people like me organ donors) get on my case about giving it up.” -JM-
___________
JM baby, listen to the wife man. By the time stem cell research comes to the rescue, your Grand Children will be dead and buried. On a positive note, Christopher Reeves put almost every dime he had to support stem cell replacement, but to no avail.
IMHO, God never gave man the authority to play God. Satan told Eve in The Garden of Eden,
” That is she ate of the Fruit from the forbidden tree, her eyes were bound to open … knowing good from bad and, that God knew in the very day she ate – she would be God.”
That my friend JM, was the first and biggest lie ever told on earth! Now look at the condition we all live in, all because of a very BIG lie. Hahaha … so JM, no and, In my truest heart Man does not have the power to create life – only to reproduce it.
Stay off that bike JM, you and me would be better off playing Russian Roulette the risk is about the same and, Russian Roulette is a lot cheaper to play. LOL & say no to stem cells.
______
O’Brien
Yeah I like the Ramon Sessions guy for his play making skills to compliment Jeff and, give us a change of pace PG for in game strategic moves. I also like his price tag. I don’t know if our window of opportunity is wide enough to start developing a whole lot of rookies If, the goal is to win this thing now.
At such low pick #’s chances are pretty slim we find a sleeper with Sund and Pendergraft pushing the – Star Trek cardboard control panel’s flashing light bulbs passing for buttons. Hahaha!
________
Slim-Juice, Jr
I threw in that Strek Analogy just for you! As a kid and hard core Trekie … I always got a kick out of seeing the observation deck going warp speed and with turbulence and Mr. Sulu pushing the “Doodle Jump” looking light bulbs. The whole control board was made of cardboard. Those planet rocks were Styrofoam. But hey, I loved it! LOL!
________
Hey cohorts, we’re screwed with this Sund guy bumping his gums about Lawd knows what? This GM is clueless! See Najeh’s first post & that’s all I got after I finished my potty mouth little female tirade. Cussin’ is good for the blood pressure – google it, it’s scientifically proven.
LOL
beone
May 31st, 2012
10:44 pm
Not sure why Sund granted the interview. I could have given answers just as enlightening and believe me, I have no particular insights into the NBA. What a joke!
Melvin
May 31st, 2012
10:47 pm
Reading Rick Sund responses makes me believe there is no hope for the Hawks future. Get a new Owner, GM and Coach in here.
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
May 31st, 2012
10:51 pm
Billy Knight tried to FIRE WOODY and the Spirit Group would not let him so it doesn’t matter who’s the GM. Gearon and his boys just want a puppet in place.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:03 pm
Daddy Day Care!
“As for Rick talking to Mr. Smith, I think Josh will listen closely to what his Dad has to say when its time to sign another contract. To me, it is surprising that Josh and other players have not had their exit interviews yet, since their season ended on 5/10 (almost 3 weeks ago).” – O’Brien -
_________
Thanks for your response there. I agree whole-heartedly with your assessment. I also, like you, believe that Mr. Smith is the decision maker on whether Josh stay or go! They know what’s up with The ASKG and, that ole Dollar Tree Bargain Bin shopping spree they got going on over there.
I invented The Dollar Tree analogy for these guys two years ago, when I saw them re-sign Jason Collins and sign Josh Powell. We might not be A Black “Billy” Knight – self appointed Basketball Expert, but, we blogger know BS when we smell it. Hugh?
Like Mrs. Roper on Three’s Company said, “What a fine mess we have here – Stanley!”
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:08 pm
PREACH!
“Billy Knight tried to FIRE WOODY and the Spirit Group would not let him so it doesn’t matter who’s the GM. Gearon and his boys just want a puppet in place.” – Wolrdwide Clyde -
__________
SERMON!!! PULPIT!!! TABERNACLE!!!! PLATE PASSING NOW!!!!
You and me both hit on the BTK – BILLY KNIGHT & I didn’t even see your post there. This franchise has been attacked by a serial killer for decades: CP3, RONDO, DERON, IGUADOLLAR (see Nique’), etc
Bind
Torture
Kill
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
May 31st, 2012
11:09 pm
CELTICS ARE A BUNCH OF CRYBABIES. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba–celtics-more-devastated-over-wasting-rajon-rondo-s-44-point-outing-than-questionable-officiating.html
I’M GLAD THE REF MISSED THAT CALL. NOW YOU KNOW HOW IT FEELS WHEN THE HAWKS WERE CHEATED.
WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND.
SteveW
May 31st, 2012
11:09 pm
You guys do know that Sac is not going to trade Cousins for Josh or Al straight up in all probability, and forget the lottery pick.
Last year in a weak draft it was reported Boston shopped Rondo for a lottery pick. No takers.
Most NBA teams highly over value lottery picks. So Cousins and a lottery pick for Josh or Al is not going to be happening anytime soon in all probability.
And another drawback of Josh/Marvin for Gasol is salary in 2013/14 – if you keep Teague and Zaza your looking at about 65 mill realistically for 5 players, not including 1st picks etc.
It gums up your cap space to bad
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:11 pm
Where is Grand Master JeJe (GM)?
He gave us that Sund interview verbatum three weeks ago. Can someone find that and re-post it on here for Sund to see. Yawl know that fool is scrolling hard tonight, reading all his hate mail.
Hey RICK!
WE DON”T LIKE YOU ON FBOOK!
WE DON”T FOLLOW YOU ON TWITTER!
WE HATE YOUR ISH!
SteveW
May 31st, 2012
11:13 pm
Sessions I really like, but he looked like garbage in the Thunder series. He’s a backup on a good team, nothing more.
Sund wanting to trade down? Can we ever trade up to get talent? Does everything have to be predicated on selling picks to make money? Don’t trade down, trade up!
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
11:24 pm
O’B, Cousins is 6′11, and he and Thompson were interchangeable at the 4/5. Would I trade Josh for Cousins and their pick, of course I would. However, I don’t think Sac would do that deal for Josh because they wouldn’t have a guarantee that Josh would re-sign. However, with Horford, they know they already have him for a minimum of 3-4 more seasons, to build a team around him. But I would trade either of the big three for that package. Cousins averaged 18 and 11 this season, without being the focal point of the offensive. So I would be looking at Cousins and the draft pick as being staples of the new core going forward.
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
11:28 pm
SteveW, Sac are trying to get a new stadium somewhere. And they know an all star or borderline all star would clearly bring fans out to support the team, and have a greater financial outlook for their franchise in terms of a fan base. For what its worth, Al and Josh both have NBAtv commercials, while Cousins doesn’t even have a local tv commercial in Sacramento.
drmaryb.(*_*).
May 31st, 2012
11:30 pm
Spinal Cord!
“drmaryb, maybe there is a way to repair the cord? The healthy body operates at a voltage between -25millivolts and -20millivolts.. Why not apply that voltage to the cord so those cells get a “jump start”, start to regenerate and possibly repair/restore the cord? I bet our military is already doing this?” – slim-juice,jr -
____________
I would love to read more about this, it sounds intriguing to me. You always share tho most interesting reads with us. Thanks.
The brain stem and spinal cord deccussates, (crosses over) in the medulla oblongata portion of the brain stem. This is key because the right brain controls the left side motor neurons and vice versa. In stroke patients the side of the body that is paralyzed indicates which side of the brain the stroke occurred.
The brain stem and spinal cord is organized into specific tracts and, their functions are above the understanding of man’s finite wisdom. The ventral and dorsal side of these tracts control sensory input from the dorsal side and motor output on the ventral side.
The CNS (central nervous system) are inoperable areas of the body and, is outside the scope of human intervention. Simply put, some things are left to God and, science in a millions years will never have infinite wisdom. Man was created in God’s image but, that’s not saying much when you look at our behaviors and stupidity.
There is a huge Chasm (gap or bridge) between finite (man’s) and infinite (God’s) wisdom.
Ra'mon
May 31st, 2012
11:31 pm
SteveW, I think Sund meant trading up, because he said if the scouts find a talent they really like that they can trade down to get. I would think if they’re targeting someone its to trade up to assure they get that player.
Grandmaster JeJe (GM)
May 31st, 2012
11:52 pm
Unbelievably great teams don’t go 4-9 in the month of February
Grandmaster JeJe (GM)
May 31st, 2012
11:54 pm
This is still Billy Knight’s team.
Look at the roster.
Melvin
May 31st, 2012
11:55 pm
OB and Ramon,
I would like to modify y’all trade even more. I would trade Al to the Kings for Tyreke Evans and No.5 pick. Possibly the big guy, Andre Drummond from UConn should be available at 5. He has legit size for C at this level. They could bring him along slowly while ZaZa is the starter. Evans could be the other scorer the Hawks need at SG and then move Joe to SF. Lastly, it would give the Hawks some cap relief with Al salary being replace by two rookie contracts.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 1st, 2012
12:01 am
PNS
Slim-juice,jr – 0ne more thing.
Peripheral Nervous System begins where the nerve roots exit the CNS on each side of the spinal column. The PNS (matrix of nerves) that innervates cells, organs, muscles may regenerate to a limited degree if surgically repaired but, only if they are not completely severed and, under extreme medical urgency and conditions (like fingers, toes, maybe an ankle) but, man you’re talking pure luck. A perfect storm of sorts.
CNS – Gray Matter indicates neural tracts, man that’s the gray horn area inside the cord. Untouchable stuff there.
Peripheral nerves are encased in a conduit of schwann cells that form a myelin sheath (like the outer plastic of live cable wires on your TV cable) if, you severe that plastic coating you can either put electrical tape around it or, splice it and put a splitter device to reconnect the live wires.
But, in the body you can’t really to that surgically. That is a procedure for a neuro-vascular surgeon. Maybe doc can help us here with PNS repair. But, the CNS for the most part (some brain lobes, non-central gyrus is operable) is beyond the scope of human ability. Inoperable and untouchable stuff there.
e.g. MS (Multiple Sclerosis) is an auto-immune disease where the brain attacks itself and de-myleinates the peripheral nerves, by destroying that sheath (that which insulates/protects/encases the live nerves) there are gaps along the long peripheral nerves where there is no sheath called “nodes of ranvier” this is where the electricity re-charges like a lightening bolt to jump and pop down the line to travel at the speed of light to control the organs, muscles and cells.
The body truly is electricity and 98% water. Amazing stuff that dis-spells the Theory of Evolution (man’s attempt to ignore God as the creator) and, explain away his awesomeness.
Buying or Selling?
Slimjr
June 1st, 2012
12:24 am
I’m in dmaryb. Thanks for the breakdown. I would like to make copy and paste that dissertation into a windows file if you don’t mind? I’ve got to go back and read it again and again… lol
BTW, In the book “The1 minute cure” by Madison Cavanaugh, she talks about curing MS and a host of other diseases using food grade 35% Hydrogen Peroxide! Fascinating read too!
Hydrogen Peroxide= H2O2, that extra molecule of Oxygen[donor of electrons] is so powerful, NASA
used it to send rockets to the moon and beyond….Imagine what it can do for the Human[energize] Body?
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
1:57 am
@brigadierjerry
brigadierjerry
May 31st, 2012
9:54 pm
High-Sider,
So you really arent a fan of the Hawks team per se, but more a fan of individual players, correct?
Also, which is more important to you to be a fan of a player or a fan of a team??
Do you reside in Ga or some other state?Also, did you become a fan of the Trailblazers when Jamal got on the team?
——————————————————————————————-
I am a fan of the Hawks as well as individual players. I’m not a fan of those poor and questionable Hawks management personnel and contract decisions.
Why can’t I be both a fan of individual players and [individual] teams? In the words of Bobby Brown, it’s “My Prerogative.”
I do not reside in [the U.S. state of] Georgia. I did become somewhat of a fan of the Blazers when Crawford joined the team but I still remained a fan of the Hawks, first.
soullrenaissance
June 1st, 2012
2:16 am
MC: Is it your perception Josh is still happy being here with the Hawks?
Sund: I’m going to have his exit interview sometime this week. But, yeah, when you read the things of him saying . . . He’s such a competitor. I was talking to his dad the other day, and he mentioned we all think we should be playing, and that’s great. And [Josh] is one of them.
___Will the results/contents of this exit interview be made public? Or will it be shrouded in secrecy. I would love to be a fly on the wall during that interview.
Buddy Grizzard
June 1st, 2012
2:46 am
“He suggests that Wroten’s jump shot is broken and he isn;t a good teammate. Yep, that sounds like a Hawk draft pick.” – AJ
Oh, Wroten is the pick, go ahead and book it.
“3) Trading Bibby and 2 first round picks for Hinrich” – O’Brien
“Sund: That question should be to Coach.”
LD: That question should be to Owner.
Gearon: That question should be to GM.” – Najeh
Classic.
“Get a HANDLE – Troll!” – drmaryb
I thought that was you being sacastic!
“The Sund-Dance Kid…” – drmaryb
LOL too much good stuff!
“Teague CAN’T PASS. he can’t run the pick and roll..”
Calling BS here. Teague could run the p ‘n r like a champ if LD had ever heard of it. I mean, this is the most fundamental play in the NBA. And we don’t run it.
Buddy Grizzard
June 1st, 2012
2:50 am
“3) Trading Bibby and 2 first round picks for Hinrich” – O’Brien
Whoops, forgot to comment on this. O’Brien, I wrote on Hoopinion before the start of the playoffs that Hinrich still had a chance to be worth two draft picks if he could help the Hawks win another playoff series (he substantially contributed to the Hawks victory over ORL last year in the first round before going down to injury).
We will never know if the Hawks could have won that series if all the minutes distributed to Green and Pargo had instead been played by Teague and Hinrich. MC said he thought the point of resting the starters during the regular season was so that you could ride them in the playoffs. Teague and Hinrich both should have played 40 minutes per night. Green and Pargo should have never seen the floor.
If Hinrich had played more and Green and Pargo never saw the floor, I believe the Hawks would have won that series.
A-Ville Ranger
June 1st, 2012
4:13 am
Sund mentioning the possibility the team might trade down in the draft tells me they’re not wanting to pay to add talent. The team needs to be thinking of moving up, not down.
His BS about paying tax this season ignored the fact he’s already sold a pick to pay for the luxury tax. The only way this team will contend for a title is to fall backwards into talent.
A-Ville Ranger
June 1st, 2012
4:27 am
Anybody thinking Sac would trade Cousins AND the 5 pick for any player on our roster is way off. I don’t think they would trade him straight up for anybody we have. The kid is just scratching the surface of his ability while all of our guys other than Teague have probably shown everything they have.
Of course MONEY is going to keep both The Hawks and The Braves from winning a title in our lives, so it’s an exercise in futility.
Buddy Grizzard
June 1st, 2012
4:28 am
“Barnes is another Marvin Williams. And this is coming from a UNC fan.” – Ra’mon
Co-sign
“JT is not the problem with this team,it’s LD.” – Rusty
Co-sign
Hawks trading down to take Wroten and his broke jumper! Projected as a second round pick by nbadraft.net!
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
6:12 am
I think when Sund says “move down”, he actually means move up. I think he’s saying there are a few guys that we might try to move up to get. There are only seven teams that we can possibly trade “down” with. Of those, only two have early to mid second round picks. Cavs pick 24, 33, and 34. Why would they try to trade up? Now Golden State has picks 30 & 35, and four picks total. If there’s a guy they like at 23, I could see them trading 30 & 35 to move up to get him.
Marcus
June 1st, 2012
6:42 am
drmaryb! and
I worked a trade on ESPN trade machine:
Marvin (@ 7 mill) for HOU PG Kyle Lowery (~5 mill) + PF Patrick Patterson (~ 1.9 mill). It went through.
K. Lowery apparently is having gettng along issues w/coach Kevin McHale. Snag is convincing ASG to let go of Marvin and convincing HOU that they NEED Marvin. LOL.
We get another proven PG to push Jeff or back up Jeff, and another young body as backup for PF/SF.
After doing that deal, I would draft SF Jeff Taylor (Vandy), or Moe Harkless (St. Johns),then maybe work some vet. min deals to fill in voids @ SG.
Buddy Grizzard
June 1st, 2012
7:48 am
Houston might do that trade if we included our next 15 first round draft picks.
Mike is Back
June 1st, 2012
8:24 am
Great Job on the interview MC…jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez…on SUND responses. SAME OLE HAWKS!
Buddy Grizzard
June 1st, 2012
9:08 am
PS I’m LOVING the AJC’s coverage of the Hawks since the season ended. I was afraid they were going to pass around the ASG Kool-Aid but it seems Bradley, Schultz and MC have all seen enough. First it was Schultz saying about Joe that $20m a season doesn’t buy heart. Then Bradley’s reaction to retaining Drew was “more hope fades.” And MC has been absolutely killing it. This interview made Sund look like the whole tool shed. Every time something new gets posted I’m like a kid in a candy store. Keep it coming!
HawksFanSince'89
June 1st, 2012
9:15 am
Dear Rick Sund,
This is how you improve the Atlanta Hawks give Joe Johnson a contract extension, where he makes less per year and a little more over the life time of the contract, and make the contract more “performance based”!! Also, Give Jeff Teague, Al Horford, and Josh Smith contract extensions w/ more money to keep our core group together, then go out and a “True Star Player”, and strengthen our bench.
O'Brien
June 1st, 2012
9:48 am
Steve W,
In salary, Sacramento is at $40 mil next year, and then $24 mil the following year, $18 mil the year after that. They have cap space, but I doubt they will convince a top level FA to sign with them. After all, when is the last time they made the playoffs, and they may be relocated (if they don’t get a new stadium).
I think they will be willing to make a trade to improve their team now, rather than continuously waiting on their young guys to develop.
Al has a very reasonable 4 years $48 mil left on his deal. imo, maybe they wont give up Cousins AND the #5 pick, but I think they will be willing to move the #5 pick for the right player, in a deal that improves their team immediately.
Melvin,
I think Tyreke’s performance has dropped off, but the key to that trade for me would be the #5 pick, so I would definitely think about it. However, the red flag for me continues to be…trading Al this offseason, and possibly watching Josh walk away next season.
If we make that deal, and Josh does not sign an extension (which I don’t think he will), we would have to look to trade him (either at the trade deadline, or in a SNT after the season).
Otherwise, we are looking at Teague-Evans-JJ-Free Agent PF-Zaza as our starting lineup, which I am not sold on.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2012
9:57 am
OB, Zaza is a free agent in 13 months. So if you trade Al this summer for a non-big, you could easily have 0 quality bigs on your roster in 13 months. That seems just plain stupid to me.
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
10:05 am
@Clarification
FYI, Jamal Crawford [at 0.927] led the NBA in FT% this 2011-2012. [See my post @12:43am dated 6/1/2012.]
cp
June 1st, 2012
10:20 am
@Melvin. The problem with playing Joe at the sf is that he does not rebound.
@Buddy. I read like a month ago that the Hawks really like Wroten. Im not a big fan of his. He cant shoot and he turns the ball over way too much. Its a great video breakdown of his game on youtube.. I would not be shocked if the Hawks selected him.
cp
June 1st, 2012
10:23 am
Well I tried to post the video but the blog monster is not letting me for some reason..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbS62r2fP9k&list=PLB767D5FCB08E26C0&index=2&feature=plpp_video
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
10:26 am
^Correction[s]:
1. “…Joe Johnson*: -11; avg. ~18-19ppg as a starter in Hawks-Magic playoff series…”
2. “…As you can see, the three best Hawks players [J. Crawford, J. Johnson and A. Horford]* in that 2011 Hawks-Magic playoff series…”
3. “…while arguably the two worst players [M. Williams and J. Collins]* in that same playoff series had the best individual aggregate +/- statistics [net points]…”
Melvin
June 1st, 2012
10:27 am
OB & Astro,
Hawks will still have the person (hopefully a big) they pick at #5. If Josh walks, then you still have his caps space to sign a FA. Besides, it’s been said and widely agreed that this core needs to be broken up. Removing some of these core player salaries for cap space is not the worst thing that could happen for this team. As constructed, the Hawks core players makes too much money as a group that can’t advance to the Conf Finals let alone the NBA Finals.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2012
11:14 am
Melvin, the one and only way I move Al is AFTER Josh signs an extension. That whole “one in the hand” thing.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2012
11:19 am
^ “one BIRD in the hand…”
northcyde
June 1st, 2012
12:00 pm
SteveW
May 31st, 2012
11:09 pm
You guys do know that Sac is not going to trade Cousins for Josh or Al straight up in all probability, and forget the lottery pick.
Last year in a weak draft it was reported Boston shopped Rondo for a lottery pick. No takers.
Most NBA teams highly over value lottery picks. So Cousins and a lottery pick for Josh or Al is not going to be happening anytime soon in all probability.
And another drawback of Josh/Marvin for Gasol is salary in 2013/14 – if you keep Teague and Zaza your looking at about 65 mill realistically for 5 players, not including 1st picks etc.
It gums up your cap space to bad
****************
If you have Gasol in the mix, Zaza is expendable. That’s actually another reason why to do a Gasol for Josh/Marvin trade. Not only does that somewhat protect you from the loss of Josh, it protects you from the loss of Zaza as well.
The most overpaid people in the NBA are mediocre centers.
In a Gasol – Horford – Zaza – Ivan frontline, I could see the minutes going something like this
PF – Horford ( 24 ) – Gasol ( 12 ) – Ivan ( 12 )
C – Gasol ( 22 ) – Zaza ( 16 ) – Horford ( 10 )
You lose Zaza, and you still have Horford and Gasol who can man the 5 spot. At that point, you’d need another center to at least give you size in the middle. Or you increase the minutes of a guy like Ivan.
PF – Horford ( 24 ) – Ivan ( 24 )
C – Gasol ( 36 ) – Horford ( 12 )
or
PF – Horford ( 22 ) – Ivan ( 16 ) – Gasol ( 10 )
C – Gasol ( 24 ) – Horford ( 14 ) – free agent/young center ( 10 )
No way should the potential loss of Zaza prevent the Hawks from doing a Gasol for Smith/Marvin deal. Zaza is definitely replaceable.
northcyde
June 1st, 2012
12:03 pm
HawksFanSince’89
June 1st, 2012
9:15 am
Dear Rick Sund,
This is how you improve the Atlanta Hawks give Joe Johnson a contract extension, where he makes less per year and a little more over the life time of the contract, and make the contract more “performance based”!! Also, Give Jeff Teague, Al Horford, and Josh Smith contract extensions w/ more money to keep our core group together, then go out and a “True Star Player”, and strengthen our bench.
*******************
Can’t extend the contract of JJ until after Year 3 of his deal ( which is next season )
and
You can’t restructure his contract unless the Hawks are under the salary cap ( which we are not )
(( shrugs ))
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
12:03 pm
^Correction: “…FYI, Jamal Crawford [at 0.927] led the NBA in FT% this 2011-2012 [regular season*]…”
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
12:09 pm
I’ve noticed that when rumors come out about teams interested in trading for Josh (like the Golden State rumor yesterday), that a lot of times, Josh gets included with lists of SF’s (Granger, Iguodala, Rudy Gay, Deng, etc…). Is this just because the media looks at his size & athleticism only, or do a lot of teams out there think that Josh is a 30+ minute a night SF?
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 1st, 2012
12:36 pm
Slim-Juice,Jr
“BTW, In the book “The1 minute cure” by Madison Cavanaugh, she talks about curing MS and a host of other diseases using food grade 35% Hydrogen Peroxide! Fascinating read too!
Hydrogen Peroxide= H2O2, that extra molecule of Oxygen[donor of electrons] is so powerful, NASA
used it to send rockets to the moon and beyond….Imagine what it can do for the Human[energize] Body?”
________
I just ordered this book online at Amazon. I can’t wait for it to get here. You have all the mental mappings of a health care provider. The world of medicine could use a forward thinker like yourself. I feel lucky to have met you.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 1st, 2012
12:43 pm
Slim-Juice,Jr
“I’m in dmaryb. Thanks for the breakdown. I would like to make copy and paste that dissertation into a windows file if you don’t mind? I’ve got to go back and read it again and again… lol”
________
Sure, send that pdf to: drmaryeb@yahoo.com & I’ll get back to you offline.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 1st, 2012
12:44 pm
Slim-Juice,Jr
you can also visit my website @: optimalkeys.com
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
12:49 pm
Just Joe – I have heard that rumor 2, Rudy Gay is on the trading block and Memphis is trying to pursue Josh.
Rudy for Josh in a straight up trade.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
northcyde
June 1st, 2012
12:50 pm
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
12:03 pm
^Correction: “…FYI, Jamal Crawford [at 0.927] led the NBA in FT% this 2011-2012 [regular season*]…”
*******************
. . . . while only averaging 3.4 attempts per game.
It’s like I said about JJ earlier in the week. What good is it to be a great FT shooter, if you don’t get to the line nearly enough for that to be a factor?.
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
12:57 pm
If im Hawks i wouldn’t make that trade.
A trade i would make is Josh for Brook Lopez.
The Rumor now is that D William wan’t to stay in Brooklyn and D12 will be headed there, Josh will be in Brooklyn New York after this year.
D William, D12, Josh, will all be in New York in 2013 that’s the rumor right now.
If im the Hawks i Trade Josh ASAP, he have made his mind up to go New York so trade him now for Brook Lopez.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
cdog
June 1st, 2012
1:12 pm
time for a change. it’s time for rick sund to go.the hawks will be stuck in failure as long as he’s GM
Najeh Davenpoop
June 1st, 2012
1:53 pm
” Is this just because the media looks at his size & athleticism only, or do a lot of teams out there think that Josh is a 30+ minute a night SF?”
I think it’s probably because the media doesn’t watch Hawks games.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2012
1:56 pm
Maybe they saw a ranking of the most long 2s in the NBA, and decided that Josh must be playing SF.
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
1:57 pm
“I think it’s probably because the media doesn’t watch Hawks games.”
in other words, they are in the majority. Not many people of any profession watch Hawks games.
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
2:06 pm
Listen Yawl:
we do not need a player for player trade [Josh].
* r.e.; Rudy Gay
This yr [2012] is the deepest draft since 2003. LBJ, Melo, Wade; et al
In the `03 draft there were:
*58 players drafted
*28 players are still in the league – *(have had a 9 yr career)
*18 of those players are / were on play-off teams ” this ‘ yr [2012]
*9 of those players are playing on teams that are still alive / play-offs
My point:
trade Josh to Houston for the diminished trade value of Kyle Lowry !
-Plus-
Both Houston`s two first round picks.
Addendum;
add Teaguer to the trade
-also-
attempt to add Scola.
The objective – coup de gras – is to receive the *’`two picks`’*
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
2:18 pm
In the yr 2021
I will most likely -not- still be alive
[not being morbid, just statistics]
Josh Smith will not be in the NBA
Moe Harkless, Andrew Nicholson, & Scott Machado
will be on play-off teams.
Mark my words !
I doubt anyone would be able to collect on a bet,
so no need ?
That`s just 9 seasons down the road.
If the ASG are still owners of the Hawks:
The saying:
” He`s in a better place ”
will never have been more true.
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
2:18 pm
BIG DOG,
I could get behind a Josh for B. Lopez trade if Lopez signed for no more than $8-$10M a year and Brooklyn threw in a future pick of some sort. There are worse trades to be made. Lopez has more of a post game than Josh or Al. Unfortunately, he can’t rebound a lick & his defense is very average. Heck, use Pachulia is a S&T for his brother. Draft Nicholson at #23. That’s a very young front line with good size. Hire a big man coach (Patrick Ewing???) to teach them Lopez boys how to rebound & defend.
1st team:
A. Horford $12M (high post) / B. Lopez $10M (low post)
2nd team:
A. Nicholson $1M (low post) / R. Lopez $5M (high post)
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2012
2:23 pm
G’dad, that is a less than 50% success rate. I’d rather have the 100% (or dang near close to it) certainty of Gay or Gasol’s production than roll the dice. If we can make a trade for a player that is top 10 at his position (like Gay, Lowry or Gasol), then I’m all for it. Folk were once excited by Jordan Hill, OJ Mayo, and Brandon Wright (as examples). I cringe at the thought of trading one of our 3 captains for any of those guys.
msc
June 1st, 2012
2:24 pm
What do you guys think about drafting Royce White or Quincy Miller?
Royce a 6′8 270 pound sf who is good at everything and Quincy a 6′10 sf.
or even Fab Melo or M.Teague and move J.Teague to the 2 spot?
any opinions?
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
2:30 pm
Grandad…how would you see Scola fitting in on this team. He’s got what…a 3 yr $30M contract left???
I’m not as confident as you in this team:
Lowry / Machado
Johnson
Williams / Harkless
Scola / Nicholson
Horford / Pachulia
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
2:35 pm
msc…R. White’s anxiety issues & jumper worry me. Miller’s knees worry me. Both have high upside though.
Slimjr
June 1st, 2012
2:49 pm
will do drmaryb..
cp
June 1st, 2012
2:58 pm
If White didnt have those anxiety issues I think he would go in the teens in this draft. Miller will be a steal if he can get back some of that lift and quickness he lost with the injury in High School. From the workout reports Ive read he looks to be moving a lot better than he did this past season at Baylor. I think after the Chicago camp and the measurements come out a lot of guys will start rising while others fall. Miller could be one that rises if he does have a crazy wingspan and test out well athletically. I read somewhere he has like a 7′4 wingspan. I dont know if that measurment is correct or not.
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
2:59 pm
Just Joe – If you trade Josh for Lopez this team is a better team with more balance, Look Josh is not coming back, so trading Josh to a team he is headed for why not get something for before he leave.
Now my second choice would be a Josh for Rudy Gay and starte Zaza at center.
Teague, Joe, Rudy, Horford, Zaza
look good on paper.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
2:59 pm
^Correction: “…Crawford’s NBA free throw rankings for the 2011-2012 [regular season*] are…”
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
3:04 pm
Josh for Lopez
Teague, Joe, ? , Horford, Lopez
Draft Terrence Jones
Bench Terrence, Marvin, Zaza
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
cp
June 1st, 2012
3:05 pm
ESPNU will be showing the draft combine June 7-8 for those who want to check it out
Slimjr
June 1st, 2012
3:14 pm
Andrew N. is going to slide down to a lower pick my gut is thinking..
Maybe 12-18? Sure wish the Hawks could get him! He’s legit in the post.
And can shoot three’s to boot…Nice.
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
3:41 pm
^Correction: “…Crawford’s rankings in FTM Average [43rd] and FTM Totals [42nd] [are*] better than many, if not most, starting guards in the NBA…”
I’m making too many mistakes. LOL
northcyde
June 1st, 2012
3:46 pm
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
2:06 pm
Listen Yawl:
we do not need a player for player trade [Josh].
* r.e.; Rudy Gay
This yr [2012] is the deepest draft since 2003. LBJ, Melo, Wade; et al
In the `03 draft there were:
*58 players drafted
*28 players are still in the league – *(have had a 9 yr career)
*18 of those players are / were on play-off teams ” this ‘ yr [2012]
*9 of those players are playing on teams that are still alive / play-offs
My point:
trade Josh to Houston for the diminished trade value of Kyle Lowry !
-Plus-
Both Houston`s two first round picks.
Addendum;
add Teaguer to the trade
-also-
attempt to add Scola.
The objective – coup de gras – is to receive the *’`two picks`’*
Josh Wants Out!
June 1st, 2012
3:47 pm
Hawks are on the right path. Stay the course, grasshopper.
good things come to those who wait.
2013 NBA Champion Atl Hawks!!!
ya gotta believe, if ya wanna achieve.
northcyde
June 1st, 2012
4:07 pm
SMH . . let’s try that again
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
2:06 pm
Listen Yawl:
we do not need a player for player trade [Josh].
* r.e.; Rudy Gay
This yr [2012] is the deepest draft since 2003. LBJ, Melo, Wade; et al
In the `03 draft there were:
*58 players drafted
*28 players are still in the league – *(have had a 9 yr career)
*18 of those players are / were on play-off teams ” this ‘ yr [2012]
*9 of those players are playing on teams that are still alive / play-offs
My point:
trade Josh to Houston for the diminished trade value of Kyle Lowry !
-Plus-
Both Houston`s two first round picks.
Addendum;
add Teaguer to the trade
-also-
attempt to add Scola.
The objective – coup de gras – is to receive the *’`two picks`’*
************************************
I’m like Astro Joe. Give me the guy who is already a proven player, over a bunch of draft picks that we’d have to develop.
And let’s keep it real about the 2003 NBA Draft.
Lebron was the high school phenom that was immediately seen as a superstar
Melo had just won the NCAA Championship in which he played like a superstar
Dwyane Wade had a triple-double to beat Kentucky in the Elite 8, to get to the Final 4
And Bosh was the best big man prospect in the nation.
3 of those 4 players are going to the Basketball Hall of Fame . . if Bosh wins a few titles, he may go too.
David West was arguably the 5th best player in that draft. So would you trade Josh Smith for David West? I wouldn’t
How about T.J. Ford?
Mo Williams?
The truth about the 2003 draft is that it was very top heavy, with the rest of the draft containing mediocre or role players.
If we’re talking about trading our young star for a draft pick, it better be for a guy who has the potential to be as good or greater than the guy we’re trading. No way am I trading Josh for a guy in the late lottery or in the middle of the 1st round.
Especially not in this draft. After Anthony Davis, who really has the accolades and the ability to be the #1 guy on a team in 5 years? I honestly don’t see a one. And even Davis looks more like the 2nd coming of Dikembe Mutumbo.
Here’s a question. Look through that draft, and tell me which guys could IMMEDIATELY start for the Hawks.
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
4:10 pm
Pau Gasol:
‘` I think that we had a good season,
*-but- it could have been *[way better]
*-since- we didn’t achieve our *[goal] of
*[winning the championship].`’
_____________________________________________
This is how Champions;
with a Champion mentality;
who have been cultivated within a Winning Culture;
think, speak, and answer questions.
Just Joe
June 1st, 2012
4:27 pm
“Here’s a question. Look through that draft, and tell me which guys could IMMEDIATELY start for the Hawks.”
In this lineup: Teague, Johnson, Williams, Smith, Horford….there are probably 12-15 guys between the SG, SF, PF & C positions that we could insert in the place of Marvin Williams, and come out just as good, if not better.
If you can trade Josh for a rotational player at PF or C (depth along with Horford & Pachulia) and Marvin’s replacement (wing player that would force Marvin to the bench), all while creating cap space, then you’ve come out way ahead of the game this offseason.
I’m not so sure we can’t draft Marvin’s replacement at #23 (M. Harkless, J. Taylor, Q. Miller, T. Jones, K. Murphy, O. Johnson, etc…), but getting an earlier pick improves our chances.
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
4:43 pm
Astro Joe / Just Joe / northcyde
two scenarios:
1st:
Lowry starts at pg …
Teague @ the [2] if he`s not inserted into the deal.
*[subsequent JoeJ trades in the works as well]
Lowry player for player Josh (besides the picks)
*50% chance = 2 picks / Harkless or A.Nicholson 1 will pan out
* for Astro Joe
* for Just Joe Intelligent bench player / low post scorer /
trade bait when he goes into his final contract yr
I see Harkless `though 19 yrs old as a defensive stopper yr one.
I also see him as a [2] guard / wing defender:
Battier / Kawhi Leonard = dynamic offense by yr 3 !
A.Nicholson could start yr one:
However; I would not due to Zaza, has earned the starters job.
Coaching psychology:
let A. Nich come off bench play starters min at three pos. [3, 4, 5]
Both these kids are legit.
I`ve seen one scouting report that has M.harkless above kidd Gilchrist.
Scott Machado will be a true pg;
if we have to give up Teaguer, then Lowrey is no slouch with Machado
backing him up.
We become deeper, more well rounded, better defensively;
*Lowry = tenacious
*Harkless = defensive stopper … think Gerald Wallace [def only]
*Nicholson = Rim Defender [length] will measure 6-9 or 6-10 ?
Josh does not wish to be here.
2nd possible scenario:
Flip Lowry & Joe for Gasol !
-then-
sign Steve Nash !
-also-
make a run @ Gerald Wallace !
[dependent on unloading Joe`s salary] !
Yes – I understand forward thinking.
Yes – I understand the industry !
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
4:47 pm
Do yawl wish to paddle water for 10 more yrs ?
-or-
do something bold with a chance of being Great !
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
5:07 pm
*Scola
* for Just Joe Intelligent bench player / low post scorer /
trade bait when he goes into his final contract yr
KevinM
June 1st, 2012
6:23 pm
I love the fact the reason we went over the cap was having guys like Stack and Damp on our bench.
We also justify keeping Marvin because he’s healthy now.
We spend more time making decisions on marginal NBA players than actually bringing in guys we can improve with.
Injuries aside, when healthy, this team was not an impressive starting 5.
Hey Slim, what was LD’s record in Year 1 vs. teams over .500?
We’re a 4 or 5 seeded team because we can’t beat anyone above us. Why is that so hard for this organization to see?
Sund not wanting to take a step back tells me how few options he really has. After 32 years, shouldn’t this guy be paying poker with a guarantee of 2 aces in his hand by now?
There is not a draft pick in this draft that LD will allow to infiltrate his system. That guy will get Teague’d for 2 years.
If I was a draft pick of the Hawks, I might they’ve to sit out a year and re-enter next year.
DawgNole
June 1st, 2012
6:44 pm
Josh Wants Out!
June 1st, 2012
3:47 pm
Hawks are on the right path. Stay the course, grasshopper.
good things come to those who wait.
2013 NBA Champion Atl Hawks!!!
ya gotta believe, if ya wanna achieve.
______________________________
“Good things come to those who wait.”
Wait how long?
After 44 years of waiting, you suggest we “stay the course”?
What an insult.
Rufus1
June 1st, 2012
6:52 pm
Josh’s money is the most important thing….
We could sign a free agents or potential free agents that would give us better options than a rookie.
George Hill
Jordan Hill
JJ Hickson
JR Smith
Courtney Lee
Kyle Lorver
JJ Redick
Ryan Anderson
Gerald Green
I would trade Josh to Houston for Dalembert, Patterson and the 16th pick… Cut Dalembert and sign Jordan Hill and JR Smith or Hickson and Green or Keep Dalembert and sign George Hill….
Any of those combinations are better than bringing in Rookies.
Grandmaster JeJe (GM)
June 1st, 2012
6:55 pm
“Hawks’ Summer 2012:
June 22: Rick Sund accepts job as GM of Portland Trailblazers. David Pendergraft is named the Atlanta Hawks GM.
Michael Gearon Jr: “We want to thank Rick Sund for his contributions to the Atlanta Hawks franchise. He is a very savvy and professional executive who really helped this team mature and grow through the years. We wish him nothing but the best”
June 24: Hawks pick up Larry Drew’s option.
July 3: A list of teams interested in JaVale McGee is reported, with the Hawks among them. The Hawks do not end up signing JaVale McGee.
July 5: A list of teams interested in Jason Terry is reported, including the Hawks. The Hawks ideally want Terry in a 6th Man role, but he shuns the Hawks, given how his prior stint with the franchise occurred.
July 6: Hawks sign Kirk Hinrich to $12 million/3 year contract.
David Pendergraft: “Kirk Hinrich has been an integral part of this franchise since we traded for him in February 2011. He has taken Jeff Teague under his wing and shown him the ropes of the game”
July 12: Joe Johnson on whether moves need to be made: “Nah man. What we got here is good. We just need to sign a few vets. We really kept our resolve this year, given all the injuries we had to endure.
July 14: Marvin Williams on his summer:
“Man I’ve just been at Chapel Hill. I just got a few semesters left until I get this African Studies Degree.
**MC: What aspects of your game are you working on this summer?
-Marvin: Just perimeter shooting in general. I need to become more reliable as a 3 point shooter also. I’m still working out with Sean May, and I even saw Raymond Felton drop by a few days ago
July 18: Michael Gearon Jr. interview with Michael Cunningham
**MC: What do you think about Joe’s performance on his contract so far?
-Gearon: I think he is still an elite shooting guard. Most people don’t know this, but Joe has had knee issues the last few years, and the fact he has insisted on playing shows he is a true warrior. That’s the funny thing about the NBA. Going into summer 2010, we had about 8 million in cap space if we let Joe go. So who do we go sign and still maintain our status as the 3 seed in the East if Joe leaves? Do we sign Bubba Jones off the street [Gearon laughs while MC looks at him curiously]?
**MC: What do you have to say to those who claim the team has taken a step back from last year?
-Gearon: That’s the funny thing about the NBA. You can overachieve in the regular season given what you have, and in the Playoffs, it’s a whole different animal. You look at the Dallas Mavericks. They won the Championship last year. They lost Tyson Chandler. They added the NBA’s 6th Man from last year. This year, they got swept by the Oklahoma City Thunder. We lost in 6 games to a team that has been elite for 5 years. We were the most injured Playoff team in the league this year. You cannot judge this team based off one Playoff series. We had a two-time All-Star who missed almost the entire regular season.
**MC: A lot of fans have the feeling that it’s the same drill every season and the ownership isn’t dedicated to winning – that this core has hit its ceiling
-Gearon: [Laughs]. Michael, you look at the Detroit Pistons, the San Antonio Spurs, and the Boston Celtics. Those main cores have been together for years. Have they been to the Finals every single year that their core has been together? An analogy I like to use is that you have to crawl before you walk. Josh and Al are just now entering their prime ages, and Joe is a 6x NBA All Star. You look at our Playoffs series against Boston. Going against 4 future Hall of Famers and a Hall of Fame coach, we played tremendous defense. We are always looking to build on what we did well and address what didn’t. Like, if I go to the same restaurant, let’s say ZaZa’s, and the service is lousy each time (God Bless ZaZa [chuckles]!), do I just quietly take the bad service every time I go? Let’s say the restaurant allows the patrons to fill out anonymous surveys. The key, Michael, is you always have to evaluate the situation and try to improve what’s good and address what’s bad. [MC thinks: "What the hell does that story have to do with anything?]
-Gearon: I know a lot of fans are upset about not winning a Championship this year, but so are 28 other teams. You look at Sacramento and Golden State. Those teams were last relevant when I HAD hair [chuckles]!
**MC: It’s been widely reported Josh Smith wants out. How do you plan on dealing with the situation?
-Gearon: I’ve known Josh and his family for so many years and it’s been incredible watching him grow up from a skinny high school kid all the way to a star in the NBA. He is the engine that keeps this team moving, especially with the injuries to several key guys this year. You look at LeBron James and you look at Josh Smith, and these are two very special players……[**notice how the question isn't actually addressed]
July 24: Larry Drew interview with Michael Cunningham
**MC: What changes do you hope to bring to this roster in terms of coaching this season?
-LD: We need to approach this season with a certain physicality. I noticed at times these last two seasons we did not display a certain sense of urgency, and if you do that in the NBA, it will be a long season.
**MC: Many people say that Josh Smith’s jumpshooting has been out of control, moreso than it was when Woodson was here. How do you plan to address this for the coming season?
-LD: ………um, well Josh has to recognize his role in the offense. He is so important to this team.
**MC: Do you have anything to say about Marvin or Horford? Marvin, one can say, had a dreadful first 4 games in the Boston series, and Joe really looked uninspiring at time in the regular season and playoffs.
-LD: No. Those guys are not allowed to be called out. It is clear that Teague and Josh Smith are the scapegoats for every problem this team has.
August 2: Hawks offer Ivan Johnson 1 year contract for the smallest possible amount. Ivan, seeing Pendergraft at the Hawks gym one morning, curses him out and has to be restrained by Anthony Johnson.
August 5: Hawks sign veteran guard Mike James to 1-year veteran minimum contract
August 11: Hawks sign veteran forward Darius Miles to 1-year veteran minimum contract
October 14: Hawks sign Matt Harpring as player development coach
cp
June 1st, 2012
6:55 pm
@Grandad. I’m reading that Harkless might go in the lottery now. I doubt he falls to us…@Slim. I don’t see Nichalson dropping to either. I’m thinking the Hawks will try and trade down from reading this interview.
cp
June 1st, 2012
6:58 pm
I would like to get Gerald Green but I think some teams are going to throw decent money at him after how improved he looked this past season. You know the Hawks want all bargain bin players. They will be looking at vet min contracts again this year to fill out the roster. Probably one or two guys from the summer league team make the roster too.
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
7:02 pm
Okay here is my list on Hawks draft by order.
1.Terrance Jones – Is a beast will be a NBA all star in league one day, can shoot from out side and has a nice low post game.
2. Jared Sullinger – Could become the steal of this draft 6′10 weight 285 pounds would be the Hawks starting center, is a monster in the paint on offense.
3. Fab Melo – The second best defender in the draft behind Anthony Davis, Has nothing but potential written all over him, would give the Hawks a legit center that could turn into a star in the NBA.
4. Jeffery Taylor – I have seen him play for the past 3years a cannot miss draft pick would be Hawks starting SF on day one, a great defender also have a nice perfect jumshot Hawks fan will like him alot.
5. Meyers Leonard – A legit 7′0 that would starte on day 1 for the Hawks, he is 10times better than Spencers Hawes of the Sixers.
Every one of these player could starte day 1 Hawks, and will be solid NBA players.
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
8:23 pm
Terrance Jones in beast mode
http://youtu.be/aszTWWSwRC4
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
8:37 pm
If you could trade Josh for Lopez and draft T. J
Teague, Joe, T J, Horford, Lopez
Pargo, Tmac, Marvin, Ivan, Zaza
Green,
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
O"Brien
June 1st, 2012
8:59 pm
KevinM,
Hey Slim, what was LD’s record in Year 1 vs. teams over .500?.
This year, LD and the Hawks were 14-21 (40%) against teams over .500. Last year, they were 14-26 (35%), so they improved slightly this season. And they did not have as many blowout losses as they had last year.
I think LD is an average coach,but when you have a top 10 payroll, you need more than an average coach (imo).
O"Brien
June 1st, 2012
9:00 pm
Grandad,
If Teague plays SG, won’t defenders back off him and dare him to shoot (instead of playing him close where he can use his speed)? And on defense, wont they try and post him up?
I think its better to make Teague the lead guard off the bench, so he can be the scoring PG he is.
BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
9:19 pm
I make this trade ASAP if im the Hawks.
Josh for Lopez
http://youtu.be/DLO47cOU6Xc
BIG DOG IN THE HOUSE
High-sider
June 1st, 2012
9:46 pm
Orlando Woolridge dead at 52
http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/basketball/bulls/ct-spt-0602-woolridge-notre-dame-bulls-chicago–20120602,0,1949134.story
KevinM
June 1st, 2012
9:54 pm
“BIG DOG
June 1st, 2012
8:23 pm
Terrance Jones in beast mode”
Dog, let me put a scare into you….do you know who TJ is being compared to at the NBA level? Do we really want to go this route? None other than Marvin…I don’t see it and I don’t see the other ones in him as well….Rashard Lewis and Jason Thompson. None of these guys are as powerful as TJ.
Me being a UK guy. I liken TJ to more of a power player who has moves in the post and can face the basket. BD, if he comes here, he is not going to get any development benefit. He needs a coach who can push him to achieve greatness….LD is no such coach. He would rather let him languish on the bench until he is forced to play him.
Now, you keep Josh and Al and Ivan…there is no room for TJ.
And if Josh is intent on being a SF here, move him. I don’t want him as my 3. I want him on the inside where he is one of the best IMO. He’s as good as Zach Randolph and that cat is a handful when he gets it going.
But we need a guy who can shoot the long jumper and a guy who can run the team should something happen to JT.
I will pine one more time for Doron Lamb. You can have Waiters. I don’t think he is a natural shooter. I see him more of a Afflalo than a scorer.
I might accept a draft pick of Draymond Green, being that he was elite at MSU. But if Josh is here, you’re wasting that pick like you did with JC2. All Crawford did was slow down the development of JT and he isn’t a PG. But LD thought he was…..like Woody thought Diaw was….ugh.
KevinM
June 1st, 2012
9:57 pm
LD + any rookie we draft has me concerned. He has very little interest in developing a player. Must be that chip he keeps on his shoulder and perhaps he had to do it his own way back in the day.
I am sure Sund has a salary number in mind with our draft choice as opposed to a talented player. This choice has to fit into a slot and I’m guessing he doesn’t want to pay him more than a vet minimum.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2012
9:58 pm
BIG DOG, not only is Sullinger not 6′10″, I have my doubts that he is 6′8″. And no way he will be on the draft board past pick 18.
Ray
June 1st, 2012
10:05 pm
Telling you now draftees that you won’t see at #23
Jared Sullinger
Perry Jones
Terrance Jones
I like us picking the Center out of Illinois or North Carolina for the longest that was what we needed is a C.
We’ll need another SG, but either we trade up or go get someone like K-mart(Kevin Martin).
KevinM
June 1st, 2012
10:20 pm
If you are hoping Dion Waiters drops to 23, you are wanting a defensive type guard. He has that Marvin Williams in that he was a key bench contributor but couldn’t crack the starting lineup.
Ra'mon
June 1st, 2012
11:33 pm
G’dad, I have a question for you. Who was a greater player, Bill Russell or Tim Duncan? I know Russell had more rings but played against less teams with less games.
Grandad
June 1st, 2012
11:42 pm
0`B
If I played Teaguer alongside a true pg;
say Nash or even Lowry,
I would play Jeff at the [2] on offense and match the other one
[whichever] on the weakest link – opponent guard.
Usually the quicker guard being the opponent`s pg.
Therefore JT would [most times] defend the point.
On some occasions Lowry, even though only 6-0,
is very strong, a great rebounding pg,
so he could handle himself vs most [2] guards.
KL was considered a combo guard for too long.
Now a true pg. / Still defensive match-ups would be accordingly.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2012
12:10 am
Rufus
Sir:
With all due respect, I must disagree;
concerning your statement about rookies.
“Any of those combinations are better than bringing in Rookies”
The rookies I`m recommending are / would be better than
the same old, same old, year after year, run of the mill,
never get any better, strive for mediocrity, Rick Sund plan.
These young men of which I speak are smart, talented, driven,
and loaded with potential.
Re-loading with scrubs – means we will most likely stay the same.
However, these kids I mention,
would bring, excitement, energy, & hustle.
I`m not saying each would be a Hall 0` Famer nor even an All-Star
but;
LBJ, Bill Russell, John Havlicek, Chuck Nevett, John Salley,
Ndudi Ebi, Rondo, Michael Olowokandi, Popeye Jones,
Elgin Baylor, Jack Haley, DrJ, Nique, Sheldon Williams,
Geert Hammink or Michael Jordan,
all had to be a rook; … one time or another.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2012
12:21 am
cp
We will have to trade up to get either Harkless, Nicholson, or both.
Which is why;
I am wishing for a trade / trades for Xtra picks.
All the while keeping our 23;
because Machado is moving up as well.
and we would need to use 23 to get him.
However I would not select Machado;
if there were not prelininary choices.
That is why we need a GM -NOW- !
As J.Shultz said:
This is preparation time … Right Now !
‘`Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance`’
The 6 “Ps” of success;
an old Army Sgt. told me that one a long time ago.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2012
12:36 am
Ra`mon
Bill Russell;
hands down, no more questions asked !
” but played against less teams with less games ”
I was not aware the NBA played less games regular season,
I`m assuming you mean play-offs ?
Doesn`t matter:
Russell`s teams;
traveled by train often in the early yrs,
players were not coddled as today, did not have team chefs,
trainers were not professionally trained as today,
diet and nutrition was abysmal, by todays standards,
the gyms were horrible, the lighting was dark,
but the worst was the floors did not have the trampoline effect
of todays floors [technology huh];
And the shoes;
by today`s standards, the players played virtually in house-shoes.
Meaning a thin (and I mean thin) layer of support.
I played in Chucks;
I know of what I speak.
“Talk about trampoline effect”
The worse thing was the landing = no support;
and;
those hard floors = hardwood with concrete underneath.
No arthroscopic surgery, No microfiber surgery !
Many times players just went on and played with “trick knees”.
-or-
Ended their careers !
Don`t give me this about that … Todays sissies vs the Old Guys !
G-dad has spoken on the subject !
____________________________________________
*disclaimer
Thate rant was not against Ra`mon !!!
Grandad
June 2nd, 2012
12:38 am
Duncan = Great / Russell = GREATER !
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
12:49 am
Its hard to find good footage on Russell’s game in his prime. And I’m only 29, so can only go by the tales of others. So trying to find a player today who is most closer to Russell’s game.
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
12:52 am
‘Most closer’ I know is terrible grammar, lol.
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
1:00 am
D. Caracter from the Lakers will be playing the Hawks Summer League this season. He’s a 6′9 PF from UTEP. Don’t know any more about him.
ryan
June 2nd, 2012
2:41 am
This interview is embarrassing, good grief he sounds like a guy who once out of here
Boston whips Miami tonight with a lineup that included Marquis Daniels and Keyon Dooling
The last two teams in the East are playing without Chris Bosh, Avery Bradley and Jeff Green- and I have yet to hear Pat Riley and Danny Ainge whine about their circumstances
If ISO Joe is really worth the money then he should be able to carry this team like Lebron and Rondo do
But we all know the reality is that Joe is more of a complimentary piece than a superstar
Just Joe
June 2nd, 2012
5:49 am
Caracter has always had skill, just plagued by poor conditioning and a bad attitude. Had to transfer from Louisville before landing at UTEP. I think he had a knee injury with the Lakers. He’s the guy most pointed to when people talked about how big of a waste the Pape Sy pick was, as in, we could have used this guy.
Just Joe
June 2nd, 2012
6:04 am
Now we just need to get Malcolm Thomas in here for mini camp and summer league. That kid is way too athletic to not be in the league. 6′9″ PF with a 7′2″ wingspan. First rookie team in d league. First team in d league. First defensive team in d league. In playoffs, 18 pts, 12 rebs, 2 assists, 1 block, on 61% shooting over 34 minutes per game. He was over 2 blocks per game in the regular season.
Just Joe
June 2nd, 2012
6:05 am
I said Thomas was a PF, but he actually plays both forward spots.
Just Joe
June 2nd, 2012
6:16 am
Draft express, in their mock, has us taking a guy that we haven’t talked about much, Arnett Moultrie from Mississippi St. I like his rebounding, but for a big guy, he doesn’t block many shots. Not too sure about his motor either. Does he want to be great, or does he want a check?
cdog
June 2nd, 2012
11:46 am
rick sund comments about being a “perrineal tax payer” tells the story what he’s about.he’s more concern with money than he is winning a championship. he’s possed with the orlando majic.someone remind him that the NBA has more teams than the majic.he virtually gave away the extra second round pick then gave up jordon crawford for nothing, deadweight in kirk hinrich. sund should not try and comeback next season. he’s only damaging the hawks by his lack of doing nothing.please do us a favor and leave.
cp
June 2nd, 2012
12:29 pm
@Grandad. Yea you’re right. We would have to trade up to get either guy. After the combine we should get a good feel about who will be rising and falling.
@Just Joe. If im not mistaken Moultrie actually played the sf positin for a while. He is very versitile but like you I dont like the lack of shot blocking for a guy so long and athletic.
dap01
June 2nd, 2012
12:39 pm
Sund is the only GM in the history of the NBA that would trade 2 #1 picks, an expiring contract for KH.
Sund is only a yes man. The Hawks are merely happy to be an NBA team, they have no desire to win.
The ASG is horrible.
Buddy Grizzard
June 2nd, 2012
12:50 pm
“D. Caracter from the Lakers will be playing the Hawks Summer League this season. He’s a 6′9 PF from UTEP. Don’t know any more about him.”
Supposedly he had offers overseas and the Lakers offered him a guaranteed contract as a second round pick, something that’s practically unheard of. I saw him play his rookie season with the Lakers and he didn’t look terrible, just a bit overweight. Not surprised he didn’t stick there because the Lakers power rotation is hard to crack. If he can get his conditioning right, he could join Ivan as a low-cost rotation big man.
Buddy Grizzard
June 2nd, 2012
12:57 pm
“Sund is the only GM in the history of the NBA that would trade 2 #1 picks, an expiring contract for KH.” – dap01
If LD had never played Green or Pargo a single minute in the Celtics series and had given all those minutes at PG and SG to Teague, Kirk, T-Mac and Joe, the Hawks might still be playing. Hard to judge the Hinrich trade when LD decided to play minimum salary vets that no other team wanted rather than the player we gave up two first round picks to get.
This to me is evidence of LD thumbing his nose at Sund. Obviously picking up LD’s option was an ownership decision. Sund hasn’t signed a one-year extension yet because he’s probably holding out for more money. He’s probably told the owners, “you won’t let me replace this complete joke of a coach you’ve just extended and you want me to rubber stamp your decisions and act as a proxy. Fine, it beats playing bingo, but I want more money.”
will
June 2nd, 2012
3:34 pm
Rick Sund, does not have a glue of what is going on!!!
First off the core of the team was build by Billy Knight, and nothing has really changed.
Billy Knight was a dam fool for quitting, his job as gm. He let these people run him out of town.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2012
5:41 pm
Enter your comments here
High-sider
June 2nd, 2012
7:56 pm
““Sund is the only GM in the history of the NBA that would trade 2 #1 picks, an expiring contract for KH.” – dap01
If LD had never played Green or Pargo a single minute in the Celtics series and had given all those minutes at PG and SG to Teague, Kirk, T-Mac and Joe, the Hawks might still be playing. Hard to judge the Hinrich trade when LD decided to play minimum salary vets that no other team wanted rather than the player we gave up two first round picks to get.” – Buddy Grizzard @12:57pm, 6/2/2012
The “Hinrich trade” isn’t hard for me to judge at all; it [the trade] proved to be a failure, a flop, and a complete disaster. In the 2011-2012 regular season, Hinrich averaged 6.6ppg, 2.1rpg and 2.8apg. In the 2012 playoffs, Hinrich averaged 5.7ppg, 2.0rpg and 1.0apg vs. the Celtics. In the playoffs this year vs. the Celtics, Kirk Hinrich went scoreless from the beginning of the 3rd quarter of Game 2 to the end of the 4th quarter and overtime of Game 3. In other words, Kirk Hinrich went scoreless for 6+ quarters [78 minutes] of playoff basketball. Kirk Hinrich scored a combined total of two points from the beginning of the 3rd quarter of Game 2 to the end of the 4th quarter of Game 4 vs. the Celtics in the 2012 playoffs. This time Kirk Hinrich scored only two points during 10+ quarters [125 minutes] of playoff basketball. From Game 2 to Game 4, Hinrich accumulated [approximately] 85 minutes and 17 seconds of playing time. This [amount of playing] shows [that] Hinrich had an ample opportunity to score the basketball. Hinrich attempted a total of 30 field goals [shots] in six playoff games vs. the Celtics; that calculates [out] to six field goal attempts per game [6 FGA's/game]. Hinrich showed himself to be a “shooting guard” who didn’t “shoot.” Finally, for those enamored with +/- statistics, Hinrich finished the 2012 playoffs with an aggregate +/- statistic [number] of -17, which was tied for [the] 4th worst on the Hawks [team]. What is your assessment of that “Hinrich trade” now?
Rusty
June 2nd, 2012
8:37 pm
High-Sider you are 100 % right. KH isnt a very good PG &as a 2 guard he isn’t a good enough scorer to be playing first string, it was a horrible trade.
Astro Joe
June 2nd, 2012
9:16 pm
Over the next few weeks, don’t be surprised if a large number of teams outside of the lottery try to trade their first-round pick. Multiple sources have told HOOPSWORLD that a lot of teams are trying to get rid their pick, which could make for an interesting draft night. “Almost everyone wants to get out of their pick in this draft,” said one Western Conference executive. “For some teams, it’s hard to take on money for multiple years in this economic climate, especially if the player would not make an impact and help the team win immediately.” HoopsWorld
High-sider
June 2nd, 2012
9:29 pm
^Correction: “…Hinrich attempted a total of 30 field goals [shots] in six playoff games vs. the Celtics; that calculates [out] to [five*] field goal attempts per game [5* FGA's/game]…”
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
9:47 pm
AJ, thankfully the Hawks can not trade out of this years first round.
High-sider
June 2nd, 2012
9:49 pm
Rusty, I hear you loud and clear about Hinrich.
northcyde
June 2nd, 2012
10:08 pm
Astro Joe
June 2nd, 2012
9:16 pm
Over the next few weeks, don’t be surprised if a large number of teams outside of the lottery try to trade their first-round pick. Multiple sources have told HOOPSWORLD that a lot of teams are trying to get rid their pick, which could make for an interesting draft night. “Almost everyone wants to get out of their pick in this draft,” said one Western Conference executive. “For some teams, it’s hard to take on money for multiple years in this economic climate, especially if the player would not make an impact and help the team win immediately.” HoopsWorld
**********************
Translation: This draft isn’t nearly as good as people think it is. Hawks actually NEED to use their pick though. Glad those idiots can’t trade it, as Ra’mon said.
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
11:00 pm
When you think though, with Kirk’s contract expiring, and Mo Evans expired last season. The Hawks would have JC2 on the roster, whoever they drafted last season on the roster, to go along with this season’s draft pick. So the Hawks would’ve had THREE players who have yet to reach their prime on the roster going into next season, instead of having Kirk.
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
11:09 pm
Rick Sund good moves were:
-Trading for Jamal Crawford
-Re-signing Zaza for what now seems to be a reasonable contract for back up center
- Drafting Jeff Teague
- Extending Al Horford
- Not re-signing Josh Childress
- Signing Flip and Mo the first season
Sunds moves that were terrible
- Re-signing Mike Bibby for longer than a 1 or 2 year deal, when there were no other offers
- Re-signing Marvin Williams for anything more than $6 mil a season annually and longer than 3 year max
- Trading Jordan Crawford, a draft pick, Mo Evans, and a contract that should’ve never been offered (Bibby) for injured prone Kirk and a journeyman bean pole in Armstrong.
- Re-signing Collins
O"Brien
June 2nd, 2012
11:38 pm
Ra’mon,
I think trading for Bibby was a good move.
Was the re-signing of JJ a good move or a terrible move by Rick?
O"Brien
June 2nd, 2012
11:41 pm
Good to see OKC tie it up at 2. Its amazing what can happen when you get your draft picks right (Durant, Westbrook, Harden and Ibaka).
I am guilty of bringing up the Marvin over CP3 and Deron draft, so I cant help but wonder if Portland fans are wondering “what-if” they had drafted Durant.
Hopefully Boston can win tomorrow and tie up their series at 2-2
Grandad
June 2nd, 2012
11:41 pm
I`m nor would I ever defend Sund !
The only bad side of yjr Kirk Hinrich deal was;
giving up the #1 pick in last yrs draft.
I said it at the time.
losing Bibby and Jordan Crawford were a positive
not to mention gaining Kirk.
High-sider
June 2nd, 2012
11:43 pm
“…Sunds moves that were terrible
- Re-signing Mike Bibby for longer than a 1 or 2 year deal, when there were no other offers
- Re-signing Marvin Williams for anything more than $6 mil a season annually and longer than 3 year max
- Trading Jordan Crawford, a draft pick, Mo Evans, and a contract that should’ve never been offered (Bibby) for injured prone Kirk and a journeyman bean pole in Armstrong.
- Re-signing Collins.” – Ra’mon
What about [the bad "moves" of] initially offering and signing Joe Johnson to a max[imum] contract and “squandering” [not re-signing] Jamal Crawford?
O"Brien
June 2nd, 2012
11:44 pm
AJ,
I think some teams in the lottery will trade their pick for the right player too.
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
11:51 pm
O’B, BK traded for Bibby, not Sund.
G’Dad, I truly believe the draft pick and JC2 were all in one, so they go together. And if Sund hadn’t re-signed Bibby to that deal, then we wouldn’t have needed to deal for Kirk, because would’ve had flexibility to add a mid level guy.
High-sider, Sund didn’t sign Joe. There’s no way he did THAT deal. That was all Gearon. Gearon is always concerned with luxury tax, so I know he would be the only one who has the say so on giving a very top max deal to any player.
Ra'mon
June 2nd, 2012
11:54 pm
G’D, I actually believe that the Hawks would’ve been able to sign Sekou’s ol’ favorite player Lou Ridnour that off season, if they didn’t re-sign Bibby for more than a season. And it would’ve been at a much cheaper price than Kirk’s $8 million price tag, and the draft pick.
Grandad
June 3rd, 2012
12:13 am
northcyde
This is a *’`deep`’* draft !
Teems that are wishing to get out;
are those with decisions, from 4 – 8, 9, 10.
Those carry the Big rookie contract nimbers and
the likelihood of getting a plyr just as good from
15 – 25 are about the same.
Projected lottery picks such as:
Bradley Beal … John Jenkins or Kevin Murphy may be better.
*[for less $]
same;
Perry Jones, Arnett Moultrie;
Andrew Nicholson will be better
Kidd Gilchrist some say Moe Harkless will turn out to be = or better ?
Why pick Drummond @ # 3 when some have Sullinger
-now- going @ #17.
Who`s to say Sully will not be better ?
last yr or yr before “Sullinger was Drummond” a top 3 projection.
Jeremy Lamb – high lottery – see Bradley Beal !
Damian Lillard @ pg, why would you want to waste a #6 pick [Prtlnd]
when Kendall Marshall will be available after him at 10 or below ?
Thomas Robinson; considered the 2nd or 3rd best player
in the draft;
but he is going to be a workmanlike player,
not a Star. [ probably a 16 & 12 guy] @ best.
Then there is Harrison Barnes ?
He is the ultimate gamble ” All ” or ” Bust ” ?
____________________________________________
nc
This is where a Team like our Hawks must make Hay.
Teams wanting to get out of the 1st round.
Josh wants out of ATL.
What better scenario ?
Lowry wants out of Houston – Houston has two 1st round picks.
‘`Let`s Make a Deal`’ … -Monty Hall-
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
June 3rd, 2012
2:51 am
FIRE SUND
EmirS.
June 3rd, 2012
3:26 am
One of many:
http://www.nba.com/2012/news/features/scott_howard_cooper/05/30/mock-draft/index.html?ls=iref:nbahpt1
Josh Wants Out!
June 3rd, 2012
8:57 am
Kirk is better than Bibby.
that is my take on the trade.
Big Ray
June 3rd, 2012
9:02 am
Sund could break a hip, tap-dancing like that at his age.
I like how he defers stuff to the head coach, who has no clue….and MC knows this, so don’t be looking too hard for an LD Q&A.
Big Ray
June 3rd, 2012
9:16 am
Hilarious that some folks are still pi$$ing and moaning about the Hinrich trade. As if NOT doing the trade would have changed our fortunes in this year’s playoffs.
Without pulling up a pile of narrow-minded stats on how much the guy scored or didn’t score, I can tell you a few things that have relevance:
1) Hinrich and Collins helped win the series against Orlando in the playoffs last year on the defensive end . Meanwhile, Jamal helped us win on the offensive end .
2) Had we kept Bibby and Jordan Crawford, we likely would have lost to Orlando last season. Why? Bibby would not have shot well, and would have defended even worse (Jameer would have lit us up), and Jordan Crawford would have never even seen the floor for more than 2 minutes per game, IF THAT. Don’t believe me? Here’s another one for ya…
3) If Hinrich wouldn’t have gotten hurt at the end of the Orlando series, Jeff Teague would have never played. And y’all know it. Even you Hinrich Haters know it .
4) Hinrich is an example of another fine veteran player obtained by the Hawks AFTER he is able to consistently give what he’s given to other teams for years. He gave us one year of it while playing in Larry’s confused offense.
Some of you need to stop blaming Hinrich for what he can no longer do, get your heads out of your bungholes and realize that HC Larry Drew is a big part of the problem. He doesn’t know when to play certain guys. Using Hinrich as a pg is no longer a good idea, but LD doesn’t get that. He also doesn’t get that you put him in the game with somebody who can cause the defense problems, getting a guy like Hinrich an open shot or two. Kirk doesn’t have the ability anymore to create his own shot off the dribble, he lacks the footspeed and our team sucks at setting screens.
It’s coaching, folks. On top of that, Sund is an idiot who will do what his owner wants, and the owner(s) is an even bigger idiot.
Big Ray
June 3rd, 2012
9:20 am
I do find it funny that scoring is our team’s problem, as evidenced against Boston. Jordan Crawford would seem like the bench solution to that, no?
Not so, and for a number of reasons. Larry Drew is reason number one, as he does not know how to develop young guards (or anything else for that matter) and had the gall to say that he felt Crawford didn’t know the difference between good and bad shots….while showing he didn’t have the ability to teach Josh Smith the same lesson. Moron.
From a paper standpoint, keeping JC2 would have solved a lot for us, at a much cheaper rate than what we were paying for JC1.
Here’s the good news – Hinrich’s contract is expiring.
Here’s the bad news – he could be retained by this farce of an organization, and used in exactly the same fashion.
Big Ray
June 3rd, 2012
9:23 am
McGrady’s problems are also an indictment of Larry Drew. The man is a fool. He needs to be kept on the bench next to a REAL head coach.
In the meantime, I wonder how Mike Woodson will do up there in New York?
He has a fully outfitted, talented team from the PG to the Center position. There won’t be much in the way of excuses for him.
will
June 3rd, 2012
9:31 am
The hawks owners needs to let R. Sund, go on back to Seatte, or wherever he’s from
he has no business being a gm, of any team in the nba. He’s scared to give tv interviews, I
don’t see him at hawks games, he admitts he does not know who in the draft that the team may be
looking at, or who are any of the college player are. he says that’s not my job.
It may not be your job directly, but you are the gm, and all of these people work for you. “you must
have forgotten”.
If any other gm in the nba, are asked what does your team needs out of the up coming draft or free
agency to get to the next level, they could easily explain the type of players they are looking for and
what steps they are taking to achieve these goals. NOT R. SUND
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 3rd, 2012
12:56 pm
Preach!
“If any other gm in the nba, are asked what does your team needs out of the up coming draft or free
agency to get to the next level, they could easily explain the type of players they are looking for and
what steps they are taking to achieve these goals. NOT R. SUND” – will -
_____________
Co-Sign. Will,.
Sund could even give an ambiguous statement to deflect or hide who the draft target, UFA, FA or player whom he wishes to trade pieces for is – if, he wishes to be coy.
But, the total arrogance of saying, “Ask Drew, that’s not my job” is totally unacceptable. Where is the genius in that? Disingenuous is more like it.
Sugar Ray
June 3rd, 2012
1:08 pm
Someone said the Hawks need a pasing PG. I disagree, teams with non-tradition PGs have won the title. What matters is the Hawks need is for their players to PLAY TO THEIR STRENGTHS and their coach to emphasize it every day, in practice and during games. Will it happen? Well you have some people (fans and those who gets paid by ASG) making excuses for certain players who refuse to play to their strengths, so they obviously don’t expect it. Bottom line, it doesn’t matter what you run, if you execute properly, you will be great.
will
June 3rd, 2012
2:03 pm
To be honest, the hawks are not that far away, “IF” they played to their potential, management showed some leadership and traded J. Smith and in return got 2 good coachable players, use their number 23 draft pick wisely, because this is a deep draft.
But unfortunately, I just cannot see something that would be so simple for ownership and management to do, actually do something, because they have the leverage (J. Smith) he has made it clear he does not want to be here!!!!
Ray
June 3rd, 2012
2:06 pm
@ Sugar Ray
Got to agree with that a passing PG won’t do us any good even if we had Rajon Rondo in the lineup I don’t think we would still win a National Championship.
The real question which position is in the greatest need is C now the most needed still because with the way Zaza has played up until that injury say what you want, but he plays his heart out may have stone hands and what not, but you can’t rely on people like Zaza to win you games he’s not the suppose superstars that’s Al Horford, Joe Johnson, and Josh Smith for the team I’m saying.
I say we get a SF or SG the SG is in case Joe Johnson is gone soon and the SF if Josh leaves.
Just Joe
June 3rd, 2012
2:06 pm
Hawks need a PG to set the offense as long as it consists of Joe (declining iso skills), Marvin (jump shooter), Josh (best when facing the basket), and Al (set shot master). Upgrade Josh or Al for a player that can demand a double team in the post, and Teague becomes a good fit (defends, slashes, improving 3 pt shooter).
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
2:12 pm
Just Joe, Josh demanded a double team on the post all of last season. How do you think Joe got so many wide open looks for the corner three or weakside wing three.
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
2:21 pm
G’Dad, I have no problems with trading Josh to Houston to get Lowry and their two draft picks. However, I don’t think Houston does that deal if its not Horford. Because the Rockets have no assurance that Josh will sign an extension with them. Seeing Brooklyn lose their draft pick just to rent Wallace for a season will have every team reluctant to trade for Josh without him agreeing to an extension. So the Hawks are left with no choice to either deal Horford or go into next season with the same big three and lack of depth.
Just Joe
June 3rd, 2012
2:21 pm
I disagree that Josh consistently demanded a double team in the post. He did show the ability to beat his man off the dribble and force other defenders to slide over to help. I’m talking more about having to send the extra defender before the first defender is beaten (forcing the offensive player to either give up the ball or try to beat the double team).
Grandad
June 3rd, 2012
2:39 pm
Ra`mon
Josh is the one who wishes to leave,
not Al.
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
2:53 pm
G’dad, maybe so. But Josh’s trade value diminishes without him agreeing to an extension with the new team he would go to. So no team will be willing to give up their draft picks, plus proven talent for a one year rental in Josh.
Just Joe
June 3rd, 2012
2:54 pm
There are probably less than a dozen post guys in the league that can demand a double team (or with fewer teams using the double team, let’s say a player that can consistently win one-on-one matchups in the post).
Howard, Bynum, KG, Love, Aldridge, Gasol, Duncan, Stoudamire, Dirk, Melo, Lebron, ???
Of course some guards like Joe and Kobe are a handful in the post as well.
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
2:54 pm
Just Joe, majority of the times, Josh on the block brought a double team. That’s why Josh’s touches improved half way through the season when Joe got hurt, because he showed the ability to pass out of the double team, better than any one on the team not named McGrady.
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
3:00 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSQxnw50wAk
Ray
June 3rd, 2012
3:02 pm
Josh is only wishing to leave only because he sees how we see ASKG their cheap.
I don’t mean cheap as in they don’t spend money they do but not wisely this past season was probably the best in terms of pickups from Free Agents, but not by much.
When your Center lineup consists of Al Horford(Not a real C, but can play), Zaza, Jason Collins, and Dampier(way past anything).
Basically Zaza is the guy you fall back on when Horford went down and he rose to the occasion this past season, but after Zaza you got Damp and Collins. Those two all they are truthfully right now are just two bodies on the floor they can score, but I’m certain Josh looks at them like just bodies that won’t do much on the floor.
So if Josh does see that then that’s probably why he wishes to leave.
If ASKG wants us the fans to be more fair to them first get rid of Joe Max Johnson he’s Konkack II. dump off Marvin Williams he doesn’t really do much on the court plus he’s in the Top 5 of all time busts. maybe Top 10 at the max.
Get us a Real Coach L.D can be a coach, but I’d rather get someone from a championship contending team not one from the back yard.
Look what happened when Chicago did that they probably would have been contending had not rose gotten hurt and also Noah as well.
High-sider
June 3rd, 2012
3:27 pm
So this blog has a “Ray,” a “Big Ray” and a “Sugar Ray” [SMH]. Is “Ra’mon” pronounced “RAY-mon”?
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
3:30 pm
Lol, nope. It’s Rah’moan
Just Joe
June 3rd, 2012
3:32 pm
Ramon…great game by Josh. I stand by my comment though. The Hawks can’t play inside-out effectively with Josh, or Al for that matter. I think Josh has the ability, but for whatever reasons (poor coaching, hard head, ???), he’s never become that player. Until we get that player, we will have a need for a PG that can create offense for the team.
Ra'mon
June 3rd, 2012
3:58 pm
Just Joe, I respect that.
Tenacious
June 3rd, 2012
4:22 pm
I think if we get rid of Sund, then Get rid of Mike Cunningham, Larry Drew, and Al hoford then wed be on the right track to turning this program around.
Any thing less and we are just kidding ourselves.
Lottery in 2.
Tenacious
June 3rd, 2012
4:45 pm
Ray Josh has made it clear he doesnt want to leave. That rumor is being concocted by the Al houdini supporters like Mike Cunningham.
Here’s what Josh is on record saying :
By Associated Press
DENVER — The Atlanta Hawks have no plans to deal Josh Smith before Thursday’s deadline, according to their co-owner.
“The likelihood of us trading Josh at the trade deadline is as close to zero as you can get,” Bruce Levenson told The Associated Press on Tuesday.
“There were a bunch of guys in the All-Star game that I wouldn’t trade for Josh, given what he brings not only to our team but to the community. He’s from Atlanta. He’s made terrific contributions to the community. It’s really hard, particularly in the middle of the season, to find that caliber player for Josh.”
Numerous reports have stated Smith wants out of Atlanta. But Levenson said those rumors are unfounded and that Smith has told him they aren’t coming from the player.
“I don’t know where the rumors are coming from and neither does Josh,” Levenson said. “Josh said to me, `They’re not coming from me, Bruce. They’re not coming from my agent.”’
Levenson said the Hawks have been contacted by other teams and wouldn’t definitely rule out any deal before Thursday’s 3 p.m. EDT deadline.
“Two days is a long time, at least in the trade world,” Levenson said. “Josh is a very smart guy. He understands the game, he understands the business, and he understands how highly we value him. The likelihood, at this point in the year, of us receiving anywhere remotely close to equal value for Josh Smith is very, very close to zero.
Read more here: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2012/03/14/1971223/atlanta-hawks-co-owner-bruce-levenson.html#storylink=cpy
Sugar Ray Robinson
June 3rd, 2012
4:51 pm
It next to impossible to up grade Josh because he is one of the best power forwards in the game. A top 4 at the position easily. Not the case with Al who as a center is mediocre as a scorer and poor as a defender, ranking some where between 12-17 amongst centers and amongst power forward hed rank some where between 28 -35.
Its very funny that Al starts drama about playing Josh position, which wouldnt be funny if he could play the position better than Josh. Clearly hes not in Josh’s league as a power forward and is only average as a center.
Dump the Chump.
Just the Facts Ma'am
June 3rd, 2012
5:17 pm
Al houdini Horford’s career playoff history. 2012 numbers only represent 2 games after he rested the entire season.
Play off average? 11pts agm @42 games and very little impact. In fact his playoff average is worst than his career average. We can get equal or near number from Ivan or Zaza if given the same minutes. Al is a waste of a 16million dollars.
Year Team G GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PF PPG
07-08 ATL 7 7 39.6 0.472 0.000 0.741 3.1 7.3 10.4 3.6 0.4 1.0 2.14 3.71 12.6
08-09 ATL 9 9 28.0 0.424 0.000 0.667 1.3 4.4 5.8 2.0 0.7 0.7 0.44 2.89 6.9
09-10 ATL 11 11 35.3 0.523 1.000 0.839 2.5 6.5 9.0 1.8 0.7 1.7 1.36 3.18 14.6
10-11 ATL 12 12 39.0 0.423 0.000 0.769 2.1 7.5 9.6 3.5 0.4 1.0 1.42 2.75 11.3
11-12 ATL 3 2 36.0 0.588 0.000 0.750 1.7 6.7 8.3 2.7 1.3 1.3 4.00 3.67 15.3
Career – 42 41 35.5 0.474 0.250 0.764 2.2 6.5 8.7 2.7 0.6 1.1 1.50 3.12 11.7
Derek
June 3rd, 2012
5:51 pm
Between Jeff Teague and Al Horford you guys arent going anywhere, but fishing
Derek
June 3rd, 2012
5:55 pm
Ra`mon
I agree, Josh doesnt want to leave, It was Al horford who said ” I think that will be very interesting” when told that he would be moving back to florida if the D12 trade is made to put Howard and Josh together.
O"Brien
June 3rd, 2012
6:00 pm
G’dad,
I agree with Ra’mon. The teams more likely to trade for Josh are the teams that are only concerned about winning now (like the Lakers). Teams thinking long term don’t want to trade for him unless he agrees to an extension (which I don’t think he will). And I don’t blame him.
For that same reason, I don’t want trade Al, because that means by next off-season, we could be w/o Al AND Josh, and possibly Zaza, who will also be a FA.
My first choice would be to find somebody to take JJ off our hands.
O"Brien
June 3rd, 2012
6:04 pm
Derek,
Are you a mind reader? What if Horford meant Josh and Howard together would be interesting? And are you even sure Al said “It will be interesting”, and not “interesting”.
And if that was Al’s exact words, since when does “it will be interesting” means he wants to leave?
Ray
June 3rd, 2012
7:14 pm
@ High-sider
Just letting you know we’re not the same people I can assure you that.
@ Tenacious
That was a article way back at All-star break basically. Josh will leave if something isn’t done the first mistake was re-upping L.D that was a horrid move.
@ O’Brien
I want to get rid of Joe Johnson too, but it’s going to take a lot of effort to do so. I’m really beginning to think our real weak link is Joe Johnson every time in the playoffs he disappears on us and the only two left playing their hearts out Josh and Yes I said it Al Horford.
I was onto Al last year about how he disappeared, but he got way more heart than Joe Choke Johnson anyday.
It would be a mistake to get rid of either Al or Josh keep them both together is what I’d say.
northcyde
June 3rd, 2012
7:37 pm
Sugar Ray Robinson
June 3rd, 2012
4:51 pm
It next to impossible to up grade Josh because he is one of the best power forwards in the game. A top 4 at the position easily. Not the case with Al who as a center is mediocre as a scorer and poor as a defender, ranking some where between 12-17 amongst centers and amongst power forward hed rank some where between 28 -35.
Its very funny that Al starts drama about playing Josh position, which wouldnt be funny if he could play the position better than Josh. Clearly hes not in Josh’s league as a power forward and is only average as a center.
Dump the Chump.
******************
Josh Smith Player 48-minute production by position @ PF in 2012
25.7 ppg ( on 23 shots )
12.7 rebs
5.2 asst
2.2 blks
47% eFG%
20.2 PER
Al Horford Player 48-minuted production by position @ PF in 2011
21.2 ppg ( on 18 shots )
11.5 rebs
4.8 asst
1.0 blks
54% eFG%
19.6 PER
********************
You make it sound like there’s some tremendous dropoff in talent from Smith to Horford. The truth is that Smith is a better rim protector. Other than that, he really doesn’t do anything better than Horford.
Buddy Grizzard
June 3rd, 2012
7:51 pm
Hey Tenacious… put down the ASG Kool-Aid!
By the way, anybody read that John Wall wants the Wizards to draft a 2-guard? I guess Adam Morrison 2.0 a.k.a. Jordan Crawford wasn’t the answer after all.
Astro Joe
June 3rd, 2012
8:24 pm
Funny how expiring contracts usally bring added trade value, except in the case of someone like Josh, huh? I am still of the belief that finding quality bigs with another 3-5 years of prime ball ahead of them is not very easy. So trading Al without locking up Josh could easily mean that you lose 2 such talented and and in-their-prime bigs within 12 months of each other. That would be beyond stupid.
O"Brien
June 3rd, 2012
8:54 pm
Northcyde,
I’m a big Horford fan, but it’s hard to compare his PF numbers (per 48 minutes) from 2011 to Josh’s per 48 numbers at PF from 2012.
For one, Josh’s numbers came without Horford in the game, whereas some of Horford’s numbers came with Josh in the game at SF. Also, whereas Josh was playing 35 minutes at PF every game, Al’s minutes at PF were not as consistent.
For example, using Marvin’s numbers per 48 minutes at SF is not a good indicator of how good (or bad) Marvin really is, if he was to play 35 mpg.
That being said, instead of losing Josh for nothing next offseason, I would prefer to trade him (assuming we cannot trade JJ).
AJ,
That is because the expiring contract allows a team to clear cap space. But in Josh’s case, a team that trades for him would want to lock him up, not clear cap space.
And the Hawks would want better assets in return for Josh than some other teams trading their expiring.
northcyde
June 3rd, 2012
9:19 pm
O’Brien. The point is that people are trying to make like Horford is a complete scrub, and that is far from the case.
I, along with everyone else, was disappointed with how he played in last year’s playoffs, when he played PF a good deal of the time. Those same people, however, act like Josh and his 39% FG shooting in the playoffs was some tremendous upgrade over what Horford could give us at PF.
Give Horford 17 shots a game, and he could average 19 points as well, just like Josh did. He can definitely rebound at the same rate or higher. He just won’t block as many shots.
Josh Smith is an extremely important cog to this team. During those times in which he plays to his strengths, he’s an All-Star talent. It’s just funny how people think Al couldn’t do the same thing that Josh did, if his usage dramatically increased.
If we don’t replace Josh with a similar or greater talent, Horford will forced to take on the role that Josh did last year. People act like if he took 17 shots a game, that he’d score 14 points. That’s BS. He’d be better than Josh offensively, just not as good defensively with weak side defense.
northcyde
June 3rd, 2012
9:23 pm
And Marvin’s numbers are what they are. Give him 35 minutes a game, and he’d be back around where he was from 2006 – 08
A 14 point . . 6 rebound guy
Joe D
June 3rd, 2012
9:32 pm
First order of business, trade Marvin to Cleveland for their 2nd round pick. This is a straight money dump similiar to Miami trading Beasley to the TWolves for a 2nd round pick. Cleveland has a ton of cap space and still for some ungodly reason they convert Marvin. Even if the Hawks have to take back a garbage player for a year; it is salary dump which is the point.
Next, sign Ivan and Zaza (extension)!
If Josh does not resign by the end of the summer, trade hm for the best available 5. If he signs, draft or sign the best available SG or PG.
This is not rocket science. Just draft and sign FAs using COMMON SENSE!
Grandad
June 3rd, 2012
10:14 pm
Ditch~Weed
As always;
I hope you`re doing well.
Grandad
June 3rd, 2012
10:22 pm
0`B
My 1st wish [Right Now] is to obtain [1st round] draft choices.
Josh is the – Best means to obtain those – I do believe.
2nd;
would be a means to trade Joe. [sorry nc]
3rd;
Keep Al
Rod from College Park
June 3rd, 2012
10:27 pm
“Give Horford 17 shots a game, and he could average 19 points as well, just like Josh did. He can definitely rebound at the same rate or higher. He just won’t block as many shots.”
“And Marvin’s numbers are what they are. Give him 35 minutes a game, and he’d be back around where he was from 2006 – 08″
Still playing fantasy basketball huh. Guess what. Horford won’t get 17 shots a game because he has no moves in the post, and he can’t create his own shot. Unless he works on his game, he is not a 17 shot a game player. Why on earth as a coach would you give Marvin 35 minutes a game when you have guys on the bench who are much better players than him, and don’t fall and turn invisible. Drew ain’t a great coach, but he has proved he is smarter than that.
Rod from College Park
June 3rd, 2012
10:30 pm
“Cleveland has a ton of cap space and still for some ungodly reason they convert Marvin.”
No they don’t. No team is going to take Marvin and his 8 mil per year salary with a player option unless they can move another terrible contract. Nobody in Cleveland wants Marvin Williams.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
12:26 am
“You make it sound like there’s some tremendous dropoff in talent from Smith to Horford. The truth is that Smith is a better rim protector. Other than that, he really doesn’t do anything better than Horford.”
Once again, stats only tell part of the story. They don’t say anything about shot creating ability, for one.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
12:26 am
“Still playing fantasy basketball huh. Guess what. Horford won’t get 17 shots a game because he has no moves in the post, and he can’t create his own shot. Unless he works on his game, he is not a 17 shot a game player.”
Co-sign.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
12:27 am
And for the record I do not think Al is a “complete scrub”. He just isn’t going to do what Josh does. He is still a very good complementary player, but he cannot masquerade as a #1 option nearly as well as Josh can.
glw
June 4th, 2012
12:38 am
Rod from c.p,
Man you are so right, I dont know why some of these people keep talking about someone trading Marvin. Aint nobody giving nothing for Marvin unless you take a bad contract in return back or send them a 1st rd draft pick for taking him off your hands. And it still might not happen even then.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
12:39 am
“Funny how expiring contracts usally bring added trade value, except in the case of someone like Josh, huh?”
Expiring contracts add trade value to players like Marvin who are completely unwanted otherwise. They don’t typically add trade value to players that the acquiring team actually wants to re-sign, because they bring with them the risk of the player walking in free agency.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
12:42 am
There is quite a bit of similarity between Joe Johnson’s per-36 numbers and Gerald Henderson’s per-36 numbers, except that Joe takes more shots and shoots better from 3. I’m pretty sure nobody is about to suggest that Henderson would adequately replace most of what Joe does, though, nor should they.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:10 am
Rod from College Park
June 3rd, 2012
10:27 pm
“Give Horford 17 shots a game, and he could average 19 points as well, just like Josh did. He can definitely rebound at the same rate or higher. He just won’t block as many shots.”
“And Marvin’s numbers are what they are. Give him 35 minutes a game, and he’d be back around where he was from 2006 – 08″
Still playing fantasy basketball huh. Guess what. Horford won’t get 17 shots a game because he has no moves in the post, and he can’t create his own shot. Unless he works on his game, he is not a 17 shot a game player. Why on earth as a coach would you give Marvin 35 minutes a game when you have guys on the bench who are much better players than him, and don’t fall and turn invisible. Drew ain’t a great coach, but he has proved he is smarter than that.
********************************
Al Horford all around game
Funny . . it looks a lot like a Josh Smith highlight.
LOL @ AL couldn’t get 17 shots per game. If you feature anybody in an offense, they can get up 17 shots a game. The question is, would he be somewhat efficient if his usage went up like that?
So Josh Smith can take 7 – 8 long range jumpers a game and reach 17 shots a game, but Al couldn’t?
This is how Al could easily get 17 shots:
- 8 mid-range shots via pick and pop or direct passes
- 3 shots via ISO post ups
- 2 shots via face up ISO drives to the basket
- 2 shots via put back offensive rebounds
- 1 shot via assists by cutting to basket
- 1 shot in transition running the break
17 shots
You act like Josh Smith lived in the post this season. He took 1101 shots in the regular season this year. 624 of those shots were considered to be jumpshots. That’s almost 57% of his shots being jumpers.
In 2011, Horford took 921 shots. 599 of them were considered to be jumpshots ( and shot 49% on those jumpers ). That’s 65% of his shots. But you think that because he doesn’t have a good go to move in the post that he couldn’t put up 17 shots a game? LOL.
As for Marvin . . it is what it is. The point isn’t whether he should be playing 35 minutes a game. The point is that when he does get that kind of time, he’s basically a 14 point – 6 to 7 rebound guy.
Those are facts.
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
1:29 am
For those who discuss Al`s lack of presence in the play-offs;
Here are some numbers:
Al shoots 59% from the field during the play-offs
Whereas Josh shoots 39% during the play-offs
Josh in virtually the same amount of games;
Has attempted approx 200 more shots [635]
Compared with Al`s [430]
They rebound at near exactly the same clip – 8.6 (Josh); 8.7 (Al)
As one would guess;
Josh avgs Two blks per – to Al`s one blk per.
*note – reflects career play-off records:
Josh (46) // Al (42)
__________________________________________
The reason I bring this up:
The erroneous perception that Al does not show up
For the post-season.
Also the negative propaganda the young man receives
On this here board.
My aim is not to discredit Josh;
Merely to show that Al is not the bum,
many of you perceive him to be.
`Tis not that if Josh is bad = Al is good;
-or-
If Al is bad Josh is good.
Tit for tat.
It`s okay to have two talented youngsters of near equal ability,
Though completely different in personality and style of play.
_______________________________________________
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:30 am
Najeh.. . so Josh lives in the post? He’s taking 8 shots a game via post ups? Is that Josh’s game?
Some of ya’ll are going to the extreme with this Al Horford can’t do this or can’t do that stuff. Al’s game is a mid-range game. You tell that dude that he has to be a featured scorer on this team, and he’s going to make sure that he gets his shots up. If it’s an increase in midrange shots, or by crashing the boards more to grab offensive rebounds, or by posting up more . . that’s what he’s going to do.
Josh Smith’s most significant value to the Hawks is on the defensive end. Now if you want to make an argument on how Al couldn’t do the things that Josh does on defense, that’s one thing. But Josh isn’t this great offensive player, and certainly not a better offensive player than Horford.
But I guess you and Rod going to argue that too . . lol.
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
1:31 am
*note – reflects career play-off records:
Josh (46) // Al (42) … games
** GAMES **
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
1:38 am
“Najeh.. . so Josh lives in the post? He’s taking 8 shots a game via post ups? Is that Josh’s game?”
I never said anything about where Josh gets his shots. What I repeatedly say is that Josh is one of the two best passers on the team by far (T-Mac being the other one), and is one of two players on the team who can consistently create easy looks for teammates when the ball is run through him. You can give me all the percentages you want and none of them will encompass the impact Josh makes by drawing double teams and creating open looks for others. That is something that Al has NEVER shown that he can do.
Al’s inability to do this does not make him a bad player. He is still very good at a bunch of other things. But on this team, with a score-first point guard and a 2-guard who grinds things to a standstill when asked to create for others, Josh’s shot creating ability is crucial to any semblance of offensive success against good defenses. So no, simply sliding Al into Josh’s spot isn’t going to result in the team cruising merrily along offensively, unless Josh is traded for someone else who can create shots for others.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
1:42 am
If Josh is traded for someone who isn’t better than Joe and Al, this is what will happen. Joe will revert to his ball-dominating 2009-10 habits, LD will do nothing to stop it, Teague and Al will continue to not receive nearly enough touches, and when Al does receive post touches, he will not convert them at a high enough rate to justify doubling him and opening up looks for others. The only way this changes is if Al goes to the Hakeem camp and learns how to create shots for himself and others in the post this summer.
Unfortunately, there is no stat that backs this up. Stats are nice when placed in context and used to supplement good observations. They are not the end-all be-all of everything that happens on a basketball court.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:55 am
And this team should be running more pick and roll with Teague + whomever anyway. Let him run it with Horford and see what the results are.
Like I said, in this game Al showed off just about everything he could do, from offense to stellar defense.
And for Rod and High-Sider, I purposely start this video at the 2:02 mark, showing the BEAUTIFUL pick and roll Jamal and Al ran in that game.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
2:16 am
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
1:42 am
If Josh is traded for someone who isn’t better than Joe and Al, this is what will happen. Joe will revert to his ball-dominating 2009-10 habits, LD will do nothing to stop it, Teague and Al will continue to not receive nearly enough touches, and when Al does receive post touches, he will not convert them at a high enough rate to justify doubling him and opening up looks for others. The only way this changes is if Al goes to the Hakeem camp and learns how to create shots for himself and others in the post this summer.
Unfortunately, there is no stat that backs this up. Stats are nice when placed in context and used to supplement good observations. They are not the end-all be-all of everything that happens on a basketball court.
*****************
Complete BS Najeh.
Because someone on this team would have to elevate their game if a player not of Josh’s caliber came to the Hawks. It’s not like JJ is going to start taking 20 shots a game if Josh wasn’t here. He’s only done that once in his career, when the best offensive person he played with was Tyronn Lue.
If JJ still has Teague and Al Horford beside him, all three of those guys are going to be heavily involved in the offense. Teague and Horford’s contributions will increase, because it would have to.
Unlike 2009 – 10, there would be no Josh Smith and no Jamal Crawford to provide offense, so Teague and Horford would have to do more by default. Marvin as well, if he were still here.
Shots per game in the 2009 – 10 season that you cite
Johnson: 18.2
Crawford: 14
Smith: 12.3
Horford: 10.5
Marvin: 8.2
Shots per game if Josh was replaced by a weaker player, especially if he was weaker offensively
Johnson: 17
Horford: 15
Teague: 12
Marvin: 10
But God forbid that our overpaid SG takes enough shots per game to possibly average 20 ppg again. And if he handled the ball more, maybe he even gets back to 5 assists per game. Nope . . no way would we want him to get more usage again.
Horford and Teague would answer the bell. Teague especially.
I’m surprised you don’t think that Teague as the PG wouldn’t get a chance to shine more without Josh in the mix. The fact that he’d get to bring the ball up the court almost full time, would increase his touches and shots by default.
With the lack of scoring threats on the team, Horford, Teague, and Marvin would have to do more. JJ isn’t going to turn into Kobe, and start jacking up 23 shots per game.
And even if JJ did play more ISO ball while holding the ball, he now has a better option in Al to pass the ball to at the end of the clock, if Al is 18 feet away from the basket playing PF.
Haha @ citing a season about JJ in which he made 3rd team All-NBA by averaging 21 ppg, average almost 5 rebounds and 5 assists, and shot 46% FG and 37% 3FG.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
2:35 am
Josh Smith posted a 28.4% usage rate last year. JJ was at 24.9%
But you believe that if Josh was gone, and if the Hawks didn’t get a better player/shot creator than JJ or Al here . . that Horford and Teague wouldn’t be much more involved in the offense? Come on Najeh, you can do better than this.
Give Teague the dang ball, and see if he can handle the increased responsibility of running the team more.
Horford has never had a usage rate over 20% in his 5 years in ATL.
Keep JJ’s usage around 25%
Bump Horford up to around the 23% usage range
Increase Teague’s usage to 20 – 22%
Let the GUARDS actually run the offense for once, while the big men play like big men. And if a guy like Horford wants to be a playmaker every once in a while, that’s not a bad thing either.
Once again, you’re acting like Josh Smith was dishing out 6 assists a game last year. He’s a very good passing big man, but it’s not like the Hawks were solely dependent on his playmaking for the offense to function. Like JJ, he shot the ball much more than he found the open man.
High-sider
June 4th, 2012
3:14 am
A Hawks “crunch time” lineup that could’ve beaten the Celtics in the 2012 playoffs:
SG – Jamal Crawford
SG – Joe Johnson
Pnt. Frwd. [Point Forward] – Tracy McGrady
PF – Josh Smith, barring injury or Ivan Johnson, if Jo. Smith is injured
C – Al Horford, barring injury or Zaza Pachulia/Erick Dampier/Jason Collins, if Horford is injured
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
3:55 am
Najeh
” Stats are nice when placed in context
used to supplement good observations.
They are not the end-all be-all
of everything that happens on a basketball court.”
Never have truer words been spoken !
I`ve tried for 3 years to get folks around here to understand
exactly whaat you`re saying.
Not only stats, but positions as well, amongst a slew of other
preconceived notions.
You mentioned ” good observations ” … Excellent point;
A trained eye can spot a basketball player by watching him play.
The measureable help;
but whether or not a kid can play = watch him,
observe him play the game.
One watches Al play basketball;
the same person understands … Al gets it.
Al is a basketball player.
One watches Josh;
1st take = Josh does not get it;
still Josh is a basketball player.
[ignorant coaching aside]
My point don`t try and put labels on kids.
Let `em play.
We worry way too muh about whether or not so & so is a
[3], a[4], or a [5].
If`n you have three good players let `em play … don`t sit one
because of some label [position some man invented
and play a dork because he fits the mold
of some arbitrary position description.
Same with statistics:
we know who can play and who cannot.
We know who the bonehead is and who ain`t.
Same for who ain`t pullin` his wgt.
-or-
who really hustles, plays hard and works for the team;
and who just cashes their check.
We don`t need stats for that.
The same for trades:
I know who has ” True ” return trade value.
I know which kids are most likely to be keepers in the draft.
It`s in the *’`eye`’* of the beholder !
Some of which have been trained.
Sund of which are blind.
____________________________________________
Did I just make a Freudian typo ?
Sugar Ray
June 4th, 2012
4:32 am
Josh defenders can only use the “post moves” argument because that’s all they have. I mean, he trashed the fans (which includes YOU), he’s inefficient yet takes a lot of shots, he whines about Al Star games, he’s clearly losing explosiveness, yet these people believe he is the one to keep around.
Once again, the Hawks offense has been their downfall in every playoff loss and a HUGE reason for that is because their least efficient players are doing all the shooting. I don’t care if they can get their own shot if they are BAD shots clanging off the rim lol. Here’s the bottom line, the people want Josh to stay around because he’s the hometown guy and they like his dunks. That’s it. His basketball IQ is simply not high enough to lead this team anywhere because experienced teams like Boston and Chicago will bait him into his bad habits and his defenders will point the finger at someone else each time.
Notice the same people are trashing efficient players (Ginobilli, Gasol, etc), the players who are playing championship bball and winning rings…. yet you love these ISO heavy players who always have some excuse as to why their teams aren’t meeting expectations. It’s hilarious actually. A few years ago, ASG tied their future to two inefficient players Josh and Joe, just like you fans wanted but now you are complaining about the teams mediocrity? Why? This is what you wanted! Lol
EmirS.
June 4th, 2012
5:42 am
With Josh Smith gone…we are still a 4th – 6th seeded playoff team.
With Al Horford gone…we are still a 4th – 6th seeded playoff team.
IMO, these two players off set each other. Decide who to keep and then get pieces that compliment that player.
Just Joe
June 4th, 2012
7:11 am
Golden State is looking for a SF to add to their starting 5 of Curry, Thompson, ???, Lee, Bogut. They are targeting Iggy, Josh, Granger, and Rudy Gay using the 7th pick plus Richard Jefferson and Dorrell Wright.
I would offer them Joe Johnson and the 43rd pick for A. Biedrins, R. Jefferson, and the 30th & 35th picks.
It would give GS an incredible talented offensive team with the shooting of Curry, Thompson, and Joe surrounding the interior games of Lee and Bogut, plus they keep the 7th pick. They have to make free agent decisions on Bogut and Curry in 2 years, but they would control Thompson and this year’s 7th pick for the life of Joe’s and Lee’s contracts.
Hawks new GM would have his hands full next offseason trying to negotiate out of the $27M in player options to Marvin, Biedrins, and Jefferson. Otherwise, these guys are roster filler, no worse than Collins, Stackhouse, and Vlad.
Hawks would hold the 23rd, 30th, and 35th picks, and would need a lot of guard help.
Teague / ??? / ??? (Sund likes 3 PG’s)
??? / ???
Jefferson / Marvin
Smith / ???
Horford / Pachulia / Biedrins
Just Joe
June 4th, 2012
7:16 am
$27M to Marvin, Jefferson, and Biedrins is a lot of salary for 2013, but we are going to owe Joe, Marvin, and veteran minimum over $30M, as is. Can you get a guy like Jefferson to accept a buyout like Bibby took? Will Marvin take a discount for a new start? Biedrins, you hope can still turn things around enough to be a serviceable 3rd string center.
O'Brien
June 4th, 2012
7:21 am
northcyde,
Give Teague the dang ball, and see if he can handle the increased responsibility of running the team more..
This I agree with. Watching Boston play, it’s amazing how after the defensive rebound, they give the ball up to Rondo or Ray Allen almost every single time. What a concept.
But LD lets Josh run the break time and time again, despite being the “kamikaze” (LD’s quote) that he is.
O'Brien
June 4th, 2012
7:34 am
This past season, Josh had what could be considered a career year, averaged 19 pts, 10 rebs, 4 assists, 2.5 turnovers, and 2 blocks per game, while shooting 46% from the field.
Here is a question for my fellow bloggers.
Assuming Josh is not on the team, and Horford’s usage increases, what kind of numbers do you think Horford could/would put up?
Imo, I think he puts up a double double. 15 pts, 10 rebs, 3 assists, 2 turnovers, and 1 block per game, while shooting 48% (although he is a career 54% shooter from the field).
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
7:47 am
“So Josh Smith can take 7 – 8 long range jumpers a game and reach 17 shots a game, but Al couldn’t?”
Al Horford two seasons ago LED THE LEAGUE in shooting percentage on long two’s. Not only COULD HE put up 7-8 long jumpers per game, but if your coach can’t come up with better offensive plays, that’s obviously THE GUY you want taking those shots.
“And this team should be running more pick and roll with Teague + whomever anyway. Let him run it with Horford and see what the results are.”
This is the most fundamental play in NBA basketball. The fact that the Hawks don’t run the pick and roll when you have a point guard with elite quickness who is elite attacking the basket is completely absurd. Yes, Teague’s jumper and passing ability are suspect. But when you’ve got a target like Al Horford who led the league in shooting percentage on long 2’s, that’s a BIG TARGET.
The Hawks’ inability to run the pick and roll is a coaching failure plain and simple. Larry Drew is not capable of teaching the pick and roll any more than he is capable of teaching Jeff Teague pick and roll defense. The two go hand in hand. If he could teach one, he could teach the other. This is why the Hawks don’t run the pick and roll.
Ray
June 4th, 2012
7:51 am
@ O’Brien
Both Josh and Al are almost identical as it stands just Josh is far more athletic is all. Yet Al has the fundamentals down which to me is very good.
I seriously LOL @ High-Sider for even suggesting that a lineup of
Jamal Crawford
Joe Johnson
T-mac
Josh Smith
Al Horford
would have beaten the Celtics this year probably would have been a 4-0 sweep by the celtics okay maybe that’s too far, but first off the only people on that lineup you’ll be able to truly count on is JJ, Josh, and Al.
How many times must it be said that Defense wins championships and every series is like a championship to get to get to the real one in the NBA Finals.
Jamal is a defensive liablity and for the 10-40 points he’d score he’d give up the same amount or more just being on the court.
T-mac is not a starter in my book he’s at best sixth man if someone gets injured sure he does become one, but not right off the bat.
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
7:59 am
Najeh you are correct that Horford doesn’t command a double team but I see upside there. I think Josh has plateaued as a player. The fact that Drew hasn’t been able to reach Josh AND THE HAWKS RETAINED DREW means that nobody in the Hawks organization will EVER reach Josh. That ship has sailed. It could not have been more evident in the series against the Celtics that Josh doesn’t want to be a Hawk. Witness all of his bad passes, quitting on plays and the way he made a complete fool of himself trying to push the fast break.
So we know what we’re losing with Josh. Although he only averages 1 block per game more than Horford, the eye test shows me that Josh impacts the game far more by virtue of the intimidation factor. By trading Josh, the Hawks end a long standing redundancy with two big me who like to shoot jump shots. The good news is that Horford SHOULD shoot jump shots. The bad news is that Horford doesn’t intimidate anybody at the rim.
As far as Horford’s ability to set up teammates, Al has a carreer average of 2.4 assists vs. 3.1 for Josh. There’s not a huge difference in passing ability there. Al just needs to develop a go-to move, as you say, and then he can approach Josh’s effectiveness in setting up teammates out of the post. The good news is that I don’t think Al has plateaued as a player and that he WILL develop a post game. Meanwhile I also believe Josh focuses on his outside game because he is trying to preserve his knee. Josh is a ticking time bomb, and as Bret Lagree noted, the team that signs him to a near max contract is going to regret it.
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
8:41 am
MC could you please moderate my last comment. Shouldn’t have used two links.
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
8:42 am
Nash has said he will listen to any offer. If the Hawks want to counter the perception that they are not committed to pursuing an NBA title, they should at least make a pitch and get themselves mentioned in the Nash recruiting stories this summer.
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:40 am
Al once took over 13 FGAs/game during an entire month (a decent sample size). He averaged 17/10 and over 3 assists in December, 2010. So yeah, I think that he can deliver more production while still being very efficient (he shot 55% that month).
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/3213/year/2011/al-horford
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:45 am
Pick & roll? Pick & roll? We have Professor Drew at the helm. Pick & roll is for high school coaches. Our head coach is running schemes so complex it requires a special camp just to teach the players how it’s done. Pick & roll… you really want to go back to the stone ages when we have a highly sophisticated and special offense that excited this blog community about 2 summers ago. Pick & roll? That is what a head coach uses who doesn’t give a dang about offense. Pick & roll? That’s like asking the guys to wear tight shorts and shoot into a peach basket. Pick & roll? Baby, please.
O'Brien
June 4th, 2012
10:18 am
AJ,
Just watching the teams in the playoffs run it, I can’t understand why we don’t. It reminds me of the previous Falcons OC who never called/ran screens. I don’t get it.
MC,
I assume you will do an interview with LD at some point. Could you ask him how come we don’t run more pick and roll, and how does he feel his motion offense has evolved (since offense has been our biggest issue)?
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
10:44 am
OB, other teams run pick & roll because they don’t have an offensive genius like Drew on the sideline. Pick & roll involves a 2-man attack, we have a 5-man attack offense.
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
June 4th, 2012
10:49 am
“Pick & roll? Pick & roll? We have Professor Drew at the helm. Pick & roll is for high school coaches. Our head coach is running schemes so complex it requires a special camp just to teach the players how it’s done.” – Astro Joe
FIRE LD
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
10:51 am
“Al Horford two seasons ago LED THE LEAGUE in shooting percentage on long two’s. Not only COULD HE put up 7-8 long jumpers per game, but if your coach can’t come up with better offensive plays, that’s obviously THE GUY you want taking those shots.”
That’s like saying Marvin Williams is a great shooter because he shoots at a high percentage. If you did not notice, Al led the league in shooting percentage because he was playing center, and guys like Hibbert, Shaq, Lopez, and Bogut would not come out of the paint and defend the 15 foot jump shot in the regular season. He was getting open looks against centers outside of the paint, because of Josh Smith and Joe Johnson. Remember Al does not want to be a center, he wants to be a power forward. Those guys will be able to close out on his jumper, and play his right hand, and his offensive game will be useless. See the Chicago series last year. I am in no way hating on Al. I like him, but right now he has a nice set shot, no left hand, and a very weak post game. Very easy for teams to take him out of the game offensively. Can he work on his game and get better? Yes, but he is very robotic and easy to take out of the game offensively if he became a focal point.
Another thing you need to realize is that no matter what the numbers say, people think twice about driving when Josh is in the paint. They don’t with Horford. Josh affects way more shots than he blocks. Guards go at Horford like he does not even exist. See Brandon Jennings and Jameer Nelson in the playoffs against us. I am in no way saying don’t trade Josh. You better get scoring and defense if you do, because if not the layup line will begin.
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
11:58 am
Yeah;
Al only makes shots when he plays center.
opposing Coaches are stupid and do not match up accordingly.
It`s Rec league,
and the NBA has a match-up at the center circle
before each game to decide who guards who ?
Teams never switch on screens either.
Yeah;
if Horford were playin` the [4] those shots would not go in.
Of course;
he cannot get his own shot anyway;
[so yawl say]
so why does it matter which position he plays ?
Boy oh Boy;
he has no post moves … so he`s not a center,
which yawl say he refuses to play.
He hits outside shots;
but they wouldn`t go in if he were playin` [4] because …
well because a Center ain`t guardin` him !
With Al;
It don`t matter with yawl;
wherever he plays … no matter his production …
someone will have a reason that decries his ability.
Admit it;
he ain`t your boy, he threatens your boy Josh [for some reason]
and you folks are gonna tear him down for that reason.
No logic !
Shameful.
_____________________________________________
If you detected any sarcasm – you may be right.
Dawg
June 4th, 2012
12:03 pm
Other teams are working out players. The Hawks are busy trying to find the least expensive combination of GM and coach.
MC: What has the Hawks organization done to inspire any confidence at all for the fans? The are a 2nd rate organization and that is not even open to debate.
Do you think the heat would have had a broken scoreboard all season? Do you think the Mavericks would have a GM with out the internet?
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
12:24 pm
“Admit it;
he ain`t your boy, he threatens your boy Josh [for some reason]
and you folks are gonna tear him down for that reason.”
Nothing to admit. I want what’s best for the Hawks. Josh should do what’s best for Josh. The facts remain that last year in the playoffs when Al was able to play his coveted PF position against Orlando, and matched up against Noah, Bass and other PF’s in the playoffs his FG% dropped from 55% (great) during the regular season to 42% during the playoffs simply because those teams decided not to leave him open from 15 ft, and his ppg dropped from 15.3 to 11.3 Those are facts. No hate involved at all. He can improve his game, just like Josh has, but at this point he does not have the skills to be a go to guy. If he takes more shots, his effeciency will go down just like every other basketball player. He is not as good as Josh is offensively or defensively period. He has a better jump shot, and plays more under control that’s it.
O'Brien
June 4th, 2012
12:45 pm
From hoopshype;
There is an excitement and buzz around the Sacramento Kings right now following the recent announcement of DeMarcus Cousins making Team USA’s Select Team..
Ra’mon,
I don’t think they will give up on Cousins. Melvin proposed Tyreke Evans and #5 for Al, but I only make that deal if I know that Josh will re-up.
Did anyone see Rondo’s interview at the end of the first half? Doris Burke asked Rondo what Boston is exploiting. His response: “They’re complaining and crying to the referees in transition”. I think Josh is guilty of that at times, so hopefully that will be out of his system for this season.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
12:56 pm
Listen, you guys are talking about can Al produce, but that’s the wrong question. Half of the NBA players can produce with more touches. The question to ask is, can the Hawks win consistently if Al gets more touches and you have no Josh Smith on the court. That is the question. The Hawks posted a better record for when Josh scores 20+ points than even when Joe scores that amount. Why? Because although Josh gets many attempts, he does so while still finding the open man, and keeping teammates involved. So the question is will the Hawks win with Al playing that role. Because greater than just looking at Al replacing Josh’s production, you have to look at Joe’s inability to consistently be the number 1 option on a winning team as well. So now you’re left with the question do you have anyone to consistently be the focal point of the team, without the Hawks missing a top 6 seed of the playoffs for a FULL 82 game season. And without Josh, I don’t believe so. Offensively Gasol could do it. But he’s about the only being even mentioned on this blog who could.
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
1:04 pm
Ra’mon, I thought the Hawks were the same before/after the All-Star break. And you may recall that Josh played better after his All-Star selection snub. I think they were +6 wins on both sides of that milestone.
Josh is more of a one-man machine than Al, but that doesn’t mean thet TEAM is better. In fact, I’d argue that Teague would be better with Al than with Josh (if it came down to those two guys), because Al would be more willing to let Teague do crazy things like lead a fast break, develop his facilitiation skills and even use some of his natural scoring skills. I’m fairly sure that when Teague made the childish mistake of not shooting the ball in a game last season (or maybe it was a half, I’m not sure), it was related to Josh making some off-hand comment about the PG needing to pass more.
Josh will always be a better fantasy player than Al, but I;m not sure that Josh is always a better teammate for a team looking to make it to the ECF.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
1:06 pm
O’B, many times Pierce, Allen, and Garnett are guilty of that very same thing, and lets not talk about the Lakers, lol. Cousins doesn’t sell tickets, and I really believe they would think that an all star center would do that in a city that won’t support a new arena. But I think if the Hawks did trade Horford for Tyreke and that pick, I think the Hawks would be able to re-sign Josh. I really believe that would show Josh the Hawks are committed to TRYING different things to win. Josh doesn’t WANT to leave. But he feels he NEEDS to leave to win a title and to be cast in the light of good players of the public.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 4th, 2012
1:07 pm
Issues!
The iSSUES with this teams composure and dynamics has always been succumbing to ONE constant:
Coaching Prowess. The true concept of team leadership just has not been there. The roles for the players of this team has never been enforced therefore, never realized consistently. I may have personally witnessed five perfectly played games in seven years – imho.
I wont even address the ownership boonked over the 4×4x4 cardboard bargain bin @ the local Dollar Tree Stores, scrounging for all those [ 2 for $1.00 ] player deals.
Pfffttt …
Jody
June 4th, 2012
1:09 pm
What about Josh for Tyreke Evans and the 5th pick?
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
1:11 pm
“If you did not notice, Al led the league in shooting percentage because he was playing center, and guys like Hibbert, Shaq, Lopez, and Bogut would not come out of the paint and defend the 15 foot jump shot in the regular season.”
The whole league leaves Josh open. Would you rather have the guy who shoots 37% from outside taking that shot, or the guy who led the league two seasons ago?
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
1:15 pm
AJ, in the two games against Boston, Al lead over a total of 6 fast break attempts, AND he brought the ball up even with Teague right there in the HALF COURT sometimes. Al does that just as much as Josh does. And AJ, the Hawks were 23-7 when Josh scores 20+, with three of those losses being under three points (Miami, Det, and Boston).
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
1:20 pm
Ra’mon, Josh is playing with an All-Star center and a perennial All-Star wing who are both locked up to long-term contracts. If Josh has an issue with a lack of talent on the roster, hopefully it is related to the non-captains.
Of course, I think his issues are more related to Josh Smith and not his teammates. Issues about contracts, support for All-Star games, post-season accolades, fans that make audible sounds when he shoots jumpers, etc. Again, all issues that are very specific about Josh. IMO, Josh needs a hug, a very public hug from the ASG. I guess that could come in the form of trading away one of more of the captains and declaring him the “King of Philips Arena”.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
1:22 pm
Jody, of course I would do that deal. Of course I would PREFER if it was Joe for Tyreke and the 5th pick. That would be a dream come true, lol. The Kings get a borderline Star.
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
1:28 pm
Ra’mon, Al does lead the fast break, but not nearly as often as Josh. While I personally hate the idea, the head coach likes the idea (of a big leading the break). Josh likely commits more TOs than Al when leading the fast break AND (as important) Josh is a top 5 fast break finisher who sub-optimizes the team’s odds of converting the opportunity by not filling the lane. And on this team, Josh is head and shoulders better than anyone at finishing the fast break. Lastly, when Josh runs the break, too often, we see him pass to the wing because he views Joe as a better scoring option in those situations. Joe shooting an open 3 is NEVER as good of an option as Josh filling the lane on a faast break. LD obviously feels differently, but my humble opinion is that Josh leading a fast break becomes a 50/50 proposition, and a fast break should represent better odds than flipping a coin.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:29 pm
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:40 am
Al once took over 13 FGAs/game during an entire month (a decent sample size). He averaged 17/10 and over 3 assists in December, 2010. So yeah, I think that he can deliver more production while still being very efficient (he shot 55% that month).
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/splits/_/id/3213/year/2011/al-horford
***********************
The interesting thing about that player page, is that it shows Al’s stats when he started at center and when he started at forward. Here are his stats when he started at forward:
15.9 ppg ( on 11.9 shots )
8.6 rebs
3.0 asst
1.0 blks
59% FG
77% FT
One of the reasons why his FG attempts increased that month, was because JJ was out of the lineup for 9 of those games.
To answer O’Brien’s question . . . if Horford got 15 shots a game, like I expect he would in the absence of Josh ( and if a lesser offensive player replaced him ), he’d easily average 18 ppg and shoot 50% FG.
JJ would probably still be the focal point, but Horford would be the undisputed #2 option, that functioned as a #1 at times. Whether people believe or not that he could get it done like a true #1 option isn’t the issue. He’d be USED like he could get it done out of necessity.
The other thing is this. Horford will STILL play center at times. If we have to roll with him and Zaza, Horford will still play center in stretches. And he’d play it more during those times in which Zaza is ineffective or if we’re playing an up tempo team.
Team Al with Gasol, and I could see both guys averaging about 13 – 14 shots a game, while JJ may only be around the 16 shot mark. Offensively, Gasol and Horford would compliment each other very well. And both are good enough on defense to not make the paint a “lay up line”.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
1:29 pm
AJ, two seasons ago Josh played with that and a 6th man of the year. This season Josh only played with an all star who was injured majority of the season. As I said before, Zaza replaced Al in the starting lineup for majority of the season, and the Hawks STILL manage to get the same seed for the playoffs. You say you think Josh just need a hug. But then you were ANAKIN’ JOE for how long? So you saw as well that this team couldn’t win a title or compete for anything. So why is it wrong if Josh sees that this team as constructed can’t compete for an ECF title and a Finals appearance. Josh wants to play with D12, or reportedly goto Boston. In BOTH scenarios, he’s not the Alpha Dog on those teams, yet you say he wants to be “King of Philips Arena”. That doesn’t add up. Josh isn’t asking to go to Charlotte or Cleveland where he can shoot as much as he likes. I love that Josh wants to play basketball in the month of June. And if Josh doesn’t feel like he can do that in Atlanta, he will go somewhere else where he can. I love that about him. I want 12 guys on my team who have that same mentality.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
1:36 pm
Listen, to me there are only 4 guys in the league that I wouldn’t trade (Lebron, Durant, Rose, and Kobe in his prime). So either of the big three for the Hawks can be traded, and should be considered for trades. I’ve posted trade ideas for all three players on this very blog. Actually two weeks ago, I posted a trade proposal of Al AND JOSH to the Kings for Cousins, Thompson, and their pick. I’ve said if Houston would take Josh for Lowery and their picks do it. But I don’t think they will because he’s a free agent coming up.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:45 pm
And this is Pau Gasol vs the Celtics back in February.
Three things stand out in this clip
- the passing
- the offensive rebounding
- the playing 15 feet and in
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:46 pm
Let’s try this again.
Gasol vs the Celtics
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
1:47 pm
LOL . . . or we’ll just do it like this and see if it works
Gasol vs the Celtics back in February
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ-8BOuqJy8
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
2:16 pm
Ra’mon, I do not believe this is a top 2 Eastern Conference team. Nor do I believe that Josh wants to win as much as I believe that Josh wants to play with a buddy. I think he needs a hug and has been hearing from Rondo about the love he receives from Boston fans and he is fully aware of the adoration that exists for Howard (although that appears to be waning league-wide). Yes, I do believe that he has a burning desire to win and I admire that passion. I also admire his passion to be great, even if that creates issues. But I don’t believe that he is terribly interested in the Hawks getting better, I think at this point he is mostly interested in improving his own situation (in tis case, mutually exclusive things). If I played for the Hawks and truly wanted to see the team do/get better, I’d “cut the line” to get into Sund’s office for a post-season debrief. I’d provide an opinion on the head coach while the front office is deciding his fate. I’d leak stories about how the ownership should use the MLE. And I would ensure that I know all of my options relative to signing an extension. Instead, Josh is saying that he can’t sign an extension, had not met with Sund as of last week’s MC report and seemingly has one foot out of the arena. I don’t blame Josh for putting Josh first… but don’t expect me to put any single hawk above the team. I’ll be cheering for the Hawks when Josh is bouncing his grandkid on his knee.
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
2:42 pm
“The whole league leaves Josh open. Would you rather have the guy who shoots 37% from outside taking that shot, or the guy who led the league two seasons ago?”
Precisely, they leave him open because they realize that is one of his weaknesses. So now that the league realizes that if you stay up on Horford to prevent the open jump shot, and play his right hand then what will he do? He will do what he did in the playoffs against Chicago unless he improves. Same difference. 42% in the playoffs. Looks kind of like Josh’s #’s huh. LOL
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
2:43 pm
Astro . . exactly.
I personally don’t blame Josh for wanting to leave, if he thinks another situation will be better for him personally. Players do that all the time. Josh is a lightning rod in ATL. He gets a lot of praise when he plays well and the team wins, but a tremendous amount of blame when he’s bad and the team loses. Probably more than he deserves, but like with JJ, that comes with the territory when you’re one of the lead guys on the team.
It’s funny though. Josh is the one expressing that he wants out of ATL, but people are trying to trade away everyone BUT Josh.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
2:47 pm
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
2:42 pm
“The whole league leaves Josh open. Would you rather have the guy who shoots 37% from outside taking that shot, or the guy who led the league two seasons ago?”
Precisely, they leave him open because they realize that is one of his weaknesses. So now that the league realizes that if you stay up on Horford to prevent the open jump shot, and play his right hand then what will he do? He will do what he did in the playoffs against Chicago unless he improves. Same difference. 42% in the playoffs. Looks kind of like Josh’s #’s huh. LOL
**********************
This is funny coming from you. Because when people bring up Jamal’s 33% FG shooting in the Bulls series, you break your neck trying to cite what he did in the Orlando series. Chicago neutralized Horford, and they damn sure neutralized Jamal.
Just like every team in the league isn’t going to hold Jamal to 33% FG, every team in the league isn’t going to hold Horford to 42% FG shooting. The difference though, is that the 33% Jamal shot is closer to his norm, than 42% is to Horford’s norm.
Increase Horford’s usage, and he probably doesn’t shoot 55%. He’ll be in the 48 – 50% range.
KevinM
June 4th, 2012
2:56 pm
“Buddy Grizzard
June 3rd, 2012
7:51 pm
By the way, anybody read that John Wall wants the Wizards to draft a 2-guard? I guess Adam Morrison 2.0 a.k.a. Jordan Crawford wasn’t the answer after all.”
Buddy, how would JC2 look on this team now? Could his game force Josh back to the block? JC2 very affordable and he fits the style of this offense.
“northcyde, Marvin 14/6 in 35min?”
I gotta ask; if Marvin isn’t worth a 2nd rounder, than why would we play him 35mpg? We must be at a really bad place to give Marvin 35mpg.
Northcyde, great Gasol highlights and he is still Top 20 IMO. But you gotta move Joe for him. No way we can afford 2 19M guys. That weakens our perimeter big time, so add’l changes are critical.
“EmirS.
June 4th, 2012
5:42 am
With Josh Smith gone…we are still a 4th – 6th seeded playoff team.
With Al Horford gone…we are still a 4th – 6th seeded playoff team.
IMO, these two players off set each other. Decide who to keep and then get pieces that compliment that player.”
Makes sense to me Emir….it would be wishful thinking that Sund would take such an agressive step to try and improve this team. My guess is it would have to have money savings or it wouldn’t happen.
My thought: move Josh because its easier to get a cheaper SF than trying to meet his contract demands. I don’t think he settles for an Al Horford contract even as a hometown discount. And if he becomes an all-star elsewhere, I don’t think it will be at SF.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
3:17 pm
Its funny, though asked NUMEROUS times by many different people, Josh has never SAID he wanted out. In the day of so many media outlets, I don’t remember the last guy who wanted to be traded for so long, but done it so quietly. Josh has only said he will not extend yet, and that he’s not been offered an extension thus far.
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
3:18 pm
“Buddy, how would JC2 look on this team now? Could his game force Josh back to the block?”
JC2 doesn’t see the floor on a playoff team. That’s why John Wall wants the Wiz to draft a 2 guard… because he wants to go to the playoffs.
hawkville
June 4th, 2012
3:25 pm
I can’t get into basketball without the Hawks playing…. boring
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
3:25 pm
“JC2 doesn’t see the floor on a playoff team. That’s why John Wall wants the Wiz to draft a 2 guard… because he wants to go to the playoffs.”
John Wall might be the problem, not JC2. John Wall is a 2 guard not a point guard. No coincidence that Mcgee started playing better when he got a decent coach and a point guard who knows how to run an offense.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
3:27 pm
KevinM . . I wouldn’t have a problem moving Joe for him. But Joe isn’t the one who wants out of Atlanta. Josh is.
So why is everybody trying to trade everyone BUT Josh Smith?
And the Hawks can afford to pay Gasol’s 19 million . . if Josh’s 13 million and Marvin’s 8 million go west. That’s actually a 2 million savings.
Heck, a lot of people believed that T-Mac on a 1 million contract was a better player than Josh Smith. If that’s the case, all the Hawks have to do is find a cheap veteran free agent that can replace Marvin’s production
Gasol + vet minimum player = 20 million
Josh + Marvin = 21 million
If Marvin is such a garbage player, he can easily be replaced by a vet minimum guy.
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
3:28 pm
Heck, a lot of people believed that T-Mac on a 1 million contract was a better player than Josh Smith
Of course, that should read Marvin Williams, and not Josh Smith.
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
3:31 pm
“This is funny coming from you. Because when people bring up Jamal’s 33% FG shooting in the Bulls series, you break your neck trying to cite what he did in the Orlando series. Chicago neutralized Horford, and they damn sure neutralized Jamal.”
Those numbers were not just from the Chicago series. He was neutralized in the Orlando series also, when they put Brrandon Bass on him, and he did not ever guard Howard. When teams focused on his strengths in the playoffs, he came up short. Thats what happens when good teams focus on you. Al has never been a guy that teams really had to focus on stopping offensively. That’s not and never has been his game. You are trying to make him something he is not.
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
3:34 pm
“So why is everybody trying to trade everyone BUT Josh Smith?”
Maybe because many people realize that after this year, there is no question who the best player on the team is. It’s not everyday you attempt to trade the best player on your team. If teams made it a habit of trading their best players, you would not have many consistent winning franchises.
KevinM
June 4th, 2012
3:41 pm
“Sund: There are two seasons. Once you become a real playoff team, there are two seasons.”
Ummm, what’s Sund’s definition of a real playoff team? One that goes but doesn’t produce? We’ve seen it for how many years now Atlanta fans?
northcyde
June 4th, 2012
3:46 pm
So Rod . . answer O’brien’s question from earlier in the blog.
If there is no Josh Smith here, what are Horford’s numbers, if he has to assume a larger role in the offense?
Rod from College Park
June 4th, 2012
4:04 pm
“So Rod . . answer O’brien’s question from earlier in the blog.
If there is no Josh Smith here, what are Horford’s numbers, if he has to assume a larger role in the offense?”
I have no idea. He has not proven that he has the offensive ability to carry a team. He has never had to do that in his college or professional career. He could step up like Josh did, or he could regress like Marvin has. I can only comment on his skillset offensively. He has a jumpshot, he is active on the glass, but his defense is questionable, he has no left hand, limited post moves, and he is very robotic. Josh is not. Simple as that. No hate, just truth. Al plays more controlled than Josh, but he does not have the physical tools, or the natural ability that Josh has. I’m not the only one who agrees. Barkley said as much also. He said Josh is the best player on the team, followed by Al. I feel it is Josh, followed by Joe, and Al is right on Joe’s heels.
Ray
June 4th, 2012
4:12 pm
@ Northcyde
I can say this Horford’s number will rise up probably about to where Josh’s is, but the thing that will keep Horford back.
#1 the fact he has to play PF Horford is a real PF, but going against some of the best at that position he’s not getting to the All-star game in fact I guarantee that he’ll be shut down by a good bit of the PF’s in the league like a Ibaka or even Lamarcus Aldridge I know he doesn’t play PF all the time, but when he does.
#2 He’s not as athletic as Josh Smith just has better fundamentals.
I still say we move Josh to SF and Horford to PF Zaza gets a promotion to full-time C I know some of y’all feel he probably shouldn’t be promoted to Center, but looking at this past year he was pretty good.
Say Try trading Joe Johnson to someone like Milwaukee
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7vvnrcb
Then Amnesty Marvin Williams
AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GO GET A REAL HEAD COACH!
FIRE LD!
FIRE SUND!
KevinM
June 4th, 2012
4:13 pm
“He said Josh is the best player on the team, followed by Al. I feel it is Josh, followed by Joe, and Al is right on Joe’s heels.”
And you put all three together, and you get what playoff results?
Move 2 or 3 of them, but Sund is a chicken to do anything that dramatic.
Ray
June 4th, 2012
4:14 pm
I do know some of your concerns about Josh moving to SF maybe not full-time, but he’s better suited for that role and he just might become that All-star that plus ASKG puts Josh’s name out there if you know what I mean.
Astro Joe
June 4th, 2012
4:24 pm
Here’s the thing about this whole “trading your best player” thing that I read about constantly. If your best player is only able to get you to a certain ceiling, then you should trade him. It isn’t about keeping your best player, it’s about assembling the best team. IMO, the best player on the Pacers won’t get them far… same for the 76ers. Should the Pacers keep Granger just because of his status on a team that maxes out at the 2nd round? That’s silly. Once you have identified the ceiling, it is time to make changes. And if your best player wants to be traded from a team that maxes out in the 2nd round… then you give him what he wants. A trade. The Hawks won’t break their ceiling with Josh SMith as their best player. And you can’t trade some combination of Marvin, Teague and Zaza and get back a player better than one of the captains. If I had my choice (as I’ve said ad nauseum), Josh & Joe leave within a few days of each other. But since I think Josh is easier to move, wants to move (or at least refuses to publicly deny that he wants to move) and has the ability to take his talents elsewhere in 13 months while leaving the Hawks with dreams of Hilton Armstrong, well, the choice is pretty obvious.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
4:55 pm
“Because someone on this team would have to elevate their game if a player not of Josh’s caliber came to the Hawks.”
You act as if “elevating their game” is something anyone can do. Once again, people don’t just “step up”. Stacey Augmon didn’t “step up” and become Nique when Nique got traded. Theo Ratliff didn’t “elevate his game” and become Mutombo when Mutombo got traded. Other players will get more shots, yeah, but that doesn’t mean they are going to pick up the slack if they don’t have the talent to do so.
“But God forbid that our overpaid SG takes enough shots per game to possibly average 20 ppg again. And if he handled the ball more, maybe he even gets back to 5 assists per game. Nope . . no way would we want him to get more usage again.”
No, we wouldn’t, because he has emphatically proven that he slows the ball movement down to a halt when the offense is run through him.
“I’m surprised you don’t think that Teague as the PG wouldn’t get a chance to shine more without Josh in the mix. The fact that he’d get to bring the ball up the court almost full time, would increase his touches and shots by default.”
I would hope so, since Teague is my favorite Hawk. The problem is, as much as this blog likes to highlight the possessions when Josh refuses to give it to Teague, there are at least as many possessions when Teague brings up the ball and gives it to Joe or Josh in the high post or behind the 3 point line and goes and stands in the corner for the rest of the possession. That is not going to change if Josh leaves. In fact, if anything, it is likely going to get worse, at least until Teague’s balls drop and he becomes more assertive in demanding the right to orchestrate the offense.
“Haha @ citing a season about JJ in which he made 3rd team All-NBA by averaging 21 ppg, average almost 5 rebounds and 5 assists, and shot 46% FG and 37% 3FG.”
Haha @ intentionally missing my point. My point was about usage, not production. Joe is not as good as he was in 2009-10, and he is likely going to decline from here on out in his career. Given the same usage he had in 2009-10, he is likely not going to produce at the same level. Not to mention, how did that level of usage for him work out in the playoffs against good defenses?
“But you believe that if Josh was gone, and if the Hawks didn’t get a better player/shot creator than JJ or Al here . . that Horford and Teague wouldn’t be much more involved in the offense? Come on Najeh, you can do better than this.”
I don’t think it is guaranteed, no. Not with Joe’s ingrained tendencies to dominate the ball.
In theory you are right. With Josh gone, Al and Teague should see their roles increase. I would certainly hope this is what happens if Josh gets traded. I am just not convinced that this is actually what will happen.
“Once again, you’re acting like Josh Smith was dishing out 6 assists a game last year. He’s a very good passing big man, but it’s not like the Hawks were solely dependent on his playmaking for the offense to function.”
Once again you are overvaluing the importance of stats without using them in the right context. Josh draws double teams and kicks to open shooters who either shoot in rhythm or swing the ball to other open men. Just because Josh doesn’t get the assist doesn’t mean he didn’t create the shot. If Rondo drives inside, draws the defense, kicks to Allen in the corner who swings to Pierce at the elbow for a wide open jumper, Rondo still created the shot, even though Allen gets the assist.
I also disagree that the Hawks weren’t overly dependent on his playmaking ability. If it wasn’t him or T-Mac on the floor facilitating for teammates, it was Kirk or Joe dribbling for 15 seconds trying to make something happen and hoisting a contested jumper. On the all-too-rare occasion that Teague got to do something, he usually did something positive, but he has to be more assertive in order for the Hawks to be able to rely on that from him on a consistent basis.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
5:00 pm
“If there is no Josh Smith here, what are Horford’s numbers, if he has to assume a larger role in the offense?”
At his current talent level: 18 ppg, 10 rpg, 48% FG, 4 FTA/game, 3.5 assists, 1.5 blocks.
Those are really good numbers, but they say nothing about his ability to command double teams and create shots for teammates. That is something he’s not going to be able to do until he develops reliable post moves and makes quicker decisions with the ball (a problem he shares with Joe).
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
5:03 pm
“So why is everybody trying to trade everyone BUT Josh Smith?”
I can’t speak for others, but two reasons: 1) if they acquire better players, they may be able to convince him to stay, and 2) I can’t think of one playoff team that traded its best player, paid a quarter of its cap to its 2nd or 3rd best player, and improved. It’s not that Josh shouldn’t be traded, but I can’t see a Josh trade that is going to improve this team without also trading Joe and possibly other players.
This team needs a nuclear bomb dropped on it. If you want to start by trading Josh, fine, but you can’t stop there.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
5:07 pm
“And both are good enough on defense to not make the paint a “lay up line”.”
No.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
5:11 pm
“Najeh you are correct that Horford doesn’t command a double team but I see upside there.”
I hope so. I really like him as a player. That is the one major hole in his game, though.
“I think Josh has plateaued as a player.”
Did you think that before he carried the team this season? People were saying this about Josh three seasons ago. I don’t agree. He showed in the second half of the season that he is trying to develop his right hand (which is sorely needed). If he gets that down he is going to be a much better player than he is now.
“It could not have been more evident in the series against the Celtics that Josh doesn’t want to be a Hawk. Witness all of his bad passes, quitting on plays and the way he made a complete fool of himself trying to push the fast break.”
Seriously? Dude played three games on a bad knee, leads all players in this year’s playoffs in rebounds per game, and did a pretty good job on KG the first two games of the series before hurting his knee. If that’s how he shows that he doesn’t want to be here, sh-t, give him an extension right now.
KevinM
June 4th, 2012
6:03 pm
Another reason to have Josh prioritized on the trade list first:
1) Al’s contract is very favorable to this organization. It’s a shame we can’t have 5 10-12M guys in the starting lineup.
San Antonio might come closest to this type of model next year.
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
6:13 pm
R.f C.P.
” John Wall might be the problem, not JC2 ”
This may be the silliest thing you`ve ever said !
____________________________________________
jhan
June 4th, 2012
6:32 pm
If Josh is the best player on any team they have issues!
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
7:00 pm
Why does Al get such a bad rap;
Play-off shooting % / parallel Josh v Al / `08 – `12:
Josh – 38%, 40%, 48%, 42%, 39%
Al. H – 58%, 42%, 52%, 42%, 47%
Al`s low is Josh`s avg for play-offs
•This is not a disparage Josh post
•This is a post to show how silly yawl are by jumpin` on one thang
•Al shot a low % [only] a couple of years;
yet no mention from yawl concerning Josh`s low play-off shooting%
who shoots a low % most every yr in the [play-offs]
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
Assist to TO ratio:
In 2012 Josh had a 1.5 to 1 asst to TO ratio …
equaling pretty bad for the amount of time he handles the ball.
Al however, in 2011, his last full season, had a 2.3 to 1 asst to TO ratio
Much more efficient than Josh as a facilitator.
Yet;
`tis preached on this board he [Josh] is such a wonderful passer.
Once again … not really disparaging Josh … only showing the ludicrosity
of belittling one teammate over another.
Ray
June 4th, 2012
7:24 pm
@ Grandad
If people were actually smart they’d realize Josh and Al are the key to moving this team forward the only problem is we need a PG like Nash to come in here Jeff Teague is good, but he could be better I don’t want Nash to take the starting spot cause Teague has more than deserved it.
Joe and Marvin are the fat that needs to be cut out for us to get moving in the right direction just got to be smart in how your trim the fat that is.
Also I would also go so far to say John Wall isn’t a PG on NBA level I said this before to my dad that I though John Wall was going to wind up a bust because he’s out of position he rubs off even worse than Westbrook as a legit SG and not a PG at all.
In fact I went so far to say that the best player out of Kentucky that year would be Demarcus Cousins even though he has maturity issues those can be ironed out depending on the coach.
Buddy Grizzard
June 4th, 2012
7:38 pm
Najeh I’m convinced Josh is trying to be Kobe (he shoots outside 15 feet more than anybody in the NBA except Kobe, and his percentage actually isn’t that far off) because he knows that knee is a ticking time bomb. The more he has to go in the post and bang with guys like Garnett, the shorter his career is going to be.
If Josh was healthy and the Hawks had brought in a real coach who was able to reach Josh and bring out his full potential, Josh could have been a super star. I still predict multiple all star selections for him once he goes to another team, but I don’t think Josh will ever be the player he could have been if his bad knee didn’t compromise the athleticism that’s central to his game.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 4th, 2012
8:06 pm
Gone Bye – Bye!
Richard Dwason “The Family Fued” Host died today @ age 79 (RIP). Well ladies, no more family kisses?
Mubarak (the ousted President of Egypt) gets life in prison today.
______________________
Will Sund be the next in line to exit stage left? (fingers crossed)
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 4th, 2012
8:09 pm
Wow!
I can’t believe anyone could shoot more than Kobe? Is this really true? Just wow!
(see the coach (in Slick-Rick’s voice)) … That is not Josh’s fault, if someone sent me a cake in the mail, I would eat it too.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 4th, 2012
8:15 pm
Pink Slime!
Who do you guys think is the “pink slime” (the floor scrappings in a meat warehouse, which is gathered, liquefied and, injected into meats @ Wal-mart, et.al) ) on this team?
____________
The ASKG
Rick Sund
Jason Collins
Eric Dampieer (he snubbed us when Deke left)
Marvin Williams
…..
Am I right?
O"Brien
June 4th, 2012
8:16 pm
Najeh,
Are you ok with blowing the team up if it sets them back 2 or 3 years?
Ra’mon,
If the Hawks trade Al Horford this offseason, and then Josh walks away next season, what is your plan? Hope the Hawks are bad enough to get a top 5 pick? And then hope the Hawks get that pick right? And then hope LD is not the HC anymore, and that pick develops into a star?
O"Brien
June 4th, 2012
8:24 pm
From Hoopsworld:
Now, after a disappointing first-round exit to the Los Angeles Clippers in this year’s postseason, the likelihood of a trade involving Gay is much higher. League sources expect Memphis to shop Gay, who is owed $53,666,790 over the next three years. Gay is no longer considered untouchable, and he could be on the move in the next few months if the right offer comes along.
If Gay does become available this summer, there would be no shortage of teams interested in the 25-year-old. The Golden State Warriors, Toronto Raptors, Brooklyn Nets and Orlando Magic are among the teams who would attempt to trade for Gay, according to sources close to the situation.
Several executives believe that Memphis could to trade Gay in a cost-cutting move since the team wants to re-sign restricted free agents O.J. Mayo, Marreese Speights and Darrell Arthur after already giving long-term deals to Marc Gasol, Zach Randolph and Mike Conley..
A scoring SF would really help our offense, but Gay is out of our price range (imo).
Its funny how you hear rumors of teams open to trading what could be considered “core” players, but you never hear anything out of the Hawks despite never getting past game 6 in the second round in the 5-6 years the core has been together (I dont count Marvin and Zaza).
O"Brien
June 4th, 2012
8:31 pm
All these articles/twitter feeds about teams working out players (even the Bulls at #29 are working out players).
Any news on the Hawks?
Tired Tired Tired
June 4th, 2012
8:31 pm
The Hawks, one of the worst sports franchises in history, and we are concerned that the general
manager who is part of this debacle is leaving. Don’t let the door hit you in the a$$. Replace him with Daffy Duck, who cares. Get out of town losers.
DawgNole
June 4th, 2012
8:40 pm
KevinM
June 4th, 2012
3:41 pm
“Sund: There are two seasons. Once you become a real playoff team, there are two seasons.”
Ummm, what’s Sund’s definition of a real playoff team? One that goes but doesn’t produce? We’ve seen it for how many years now Atlanta fans?
______________________
FORTY-FOUR (44)!!!
(Tried to resist, but when no one else jumped in and answered your question, I couldn’t help myself.)
DawgNole
June 4th, 2012
8:45 pm
O”Brien
June 4th, 2012
8:24 pm
Its funny how you hear rumors of teams open to trading what could be considered “core” players, but you never hear anything out of the Hawks despite never getting past game 6 in the second round in the 5-6 years the core has been together (I dont count Marvin and Zaza).
________________________
How about “never getting past” Round 2 PERIOD in the 44 years the organization has been in ATL?
It (never hearing anything out of the Hawks when QUALITY players are available) is part of what losers are all about.
DawgNole
June 4th, 2012
8:46 pm
O”Brien
June 4th, 2012
8:31 pm
All these articles/twitter feeds about teams working out players (even the Bulls at #29 are working out players).
Any news on the Hawks?
______________________
Nope. (Not surprised, are you?)
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
8:50 pm
O’Brien, I’ve only mentioned Horford in trades for either a big or draft picks. If Horford was traded to Houston for those two draft picks and Lowery, the Hawks should use two picks one for Nicholson (is that his name?) the talented PF/C who can score from anywhere, and the other for the best big available at that slot. You draft two bigs this season, with the other pick going for a wing player or Marshall (hopefully). And then you have a strong back court for the next 4-5 seasons guaranteed. And if Josh leaves (which I don’t think he would), you still are already in position with two bigs that are learning the ropes, and producing, along with Zaza. If Josh extends, you have a deep backcourt with a deep talented front court. If Houston would take Josh, I would do the same trade for Josh also.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
8:55 pm
Think about this, the Hornets sold quicker in a worse market than Atlanta, with no star power, faster than the Hawks. So even from a business standpoint, if Josh and Al were both off the roster, and the only big contract left was Joe, would it be not easier to sell to an owner who wants to bring in his own team and rebuild? My thoughts are, Horford trade value will disappear after this season.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
9:02 pm
JJ for Gay makes too much sense for both team. So the deal won’t get done.
Sautee
June 4th, 2012
9:09 pm
“My thoughts are, Horford trade value will disappear after this season.” – Ramon
Ramon, since Horford’s numbers have increased every season, and he’s only 25, what are you basing that on? If Josh stays, he’ll still be the starting center, so he’ll still get lots of mid-range looks. And with Teague’s development, he’ll also get lots of dunks. How many of Teague’s passes did Zaza fumble? Al wouldn’t fumble those passes. The better Teague gets at penetrate-and-dish, the more Al will score. I don’t see any reason that his trade value would diminish.
Bravesfan79
June 4th, 2012
9:11 pm
What we need is new coach whos system dosent include Josh Smith taking 10 million outside jumpers!
Just Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:17 pm
JJ for Gay doesn’t make sense if Memphis is trying to create cap space to re-sign their free agents.
Marvin, ZaZa, and our 2013 first round pick makes some sense. Pondexter and Marvin could hold down the SF spot. ZaZa gives them a solid backup C on an expiring deal. They save $3M in cap space this year. They don’t want another 1st rd pick this year because of the guaranteed salary and nearly full roster, so an unprotected pick for next year would be what they’re looking for. Maybe a team under the cap can put together a better deal, but Ruy G makes a lot of money over the next 3 years.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
9:25 pm
Just Joe, all of Memphis free agents are locked up. Remember Zach, Conley, and Gasol have signed their deals. Mayo and Gay are both free agent. Memphis needs a closer for some games. And JJ is great at that. The injuries that Memphis had this season will help them re-sign Arthur for a cheaper price when its time.
Just Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:32 pm
The article just said that they wanted to free up space to re-sign Mayo, Speights, and Arthur. Gay is owed $53M over the next 3 years. Joe is owed $80M+ over 4 years, including $3M more in the upcoming season.
Just Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:42 pm
$3M more than Gay that is.
Just Joe
June 4th, 2012
9:46 pm
Could LD control Teague, Johnson, Gay, Smith, Horford, and the 23rd pick?
Would our owners spend the necessary money to add a bench?
Naahhh.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
10:19 pm
“Are you ok with blowing the team up if it sets them back 2 or 3 years?”
Yes, emphatically. Much better than trying to make lateral moves. Either trade multiple pieces for someone of Dwight Howard’s caliber, or blow it up and build with high lottery picks.
High-sider
June 4th, 2012
10:24 pm
Russell Westbrook’s and Kevin Durant’s [partial] first half stats for Game 5 vs. the Spurs in the 2012 WCF:
Westbrook: 4-11 [FGM-FGA], 0-2 [3PM-3PA], 2-2 [FTM-FTA], 2rebs, 7asts, 3stls, 10pts, 21mins [rnd]
Durant: 1-6 [FGM-FGA], 0-3 [3PM-3PA], 3-4 [FTM-FTA], 0rebs, 4asts, 1stl, 5pts, 19mins [rnd]
I told [some of] you [bloggers] [that] Westbrook was a “gunner.”
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
10:26 pm
Sautee, I’m saying if Al moves to the PF, then his trade value will go down. The very things that make Horford productive as a center, are the very things that will become less reliant at the PF position for him.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
10:33 pm
Najeh, exactly. Everyone saying about the possibility if in two years, there’s no Josh or Al on this team. I really don’t see what’s the terrible part of that if it ended up happening, if that’s the worst case scenario. If this is a superstar league (each of the four teams left have a superstar – say what you want Duncan is the greatest PF/C ever to play the game skills wise, during my life time, he’s a superstar commercials or not), and you don’t have a superstar on the team. And you don’t have the ownership to lure a superstar, what’s wrong with going into the lottery to find a superstar?
O"Brien
June 4th, 2012
10:49 pm
Ray,
More than anything, I think this team needs an above average HC. He would get Josh to play to his strengths, run more pick and roll, give Teague a bigger role, get guys easier shots within the offense etc.
Also, I think John Wall would benefit from good coaching, and a better culture.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
10:52 pm
O’B, would you be for (I know Sund wouldn’t dare consider this in reality) a sign and trade deal of Josh for Eric Gordon, if Gordon came in at 4 years $52 mil?
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
11:00 pm
High-Sider, why are half the words in each of your sentences in [brackets]? Just wondering.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
11:06 pm
“If this is a superstar league (each of the four teams left have a superstar – say what you want Duncan is the greatest PF/C ever to play the game skills wise, during my life time, he’s a superstar commercials or not), and you don’t have a superstar on the team. And you don’t have the ownership to lure a superstar, what’s wrong with going into the lottery to find a superstar?”
Yup.
If they trade Josh for an equal player (e.g. Gasol or Lowry, two names frequently mentioned over the last couple of weeks), they are treading water. They will continue being a first or second round team with no hope for a championship.
If they trade Josh for several lesser players (which is the most likely scenario in a Josh trade), they will be taking a step back regardless, since he is their best player. If they are going to take a step back, why not take a step all the way back so that they get a chance to get a superstar on the team?
My preferred course of action is to trade Joe and Al for Dwight, go into next season with a Teague-Josh-Dwight core, hope you can convince Josh and Dwight to stay next summer, and if not, bottom out the next two years and build around the 2014 and 2015 first round picks + Teague + one or two smart free agent signings. The worst place to be in the NBA is in the no-man’s land in which the Hawks currently find themselves.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
11:07 pm
And regardless of how well my plan goes, I can guarantee that the Hawks would post their highest single season attendance since the Nique era if they actually managed to pull off a Dwight trade.
High-sider
June 4th, 2012
11:13 pm
@Najeh Davenpoop
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
11:00 pm
High-Sider, why are half the words in each of your sentences in [brackets]? Just wondering.
————————————————————————————————-
That’s [my] style [much] like [Russell] Westbrook wearing frames [without lenses]. [with brackets]
That’s style like Westbrook wearing frames. [without brackets]
See the difference. [LOL]
Grandad
June 4th, 2012
11:14 pm
” If Horford moves from Center to Forward;
his trade value will diminish ”
paraphrased … by Ra`mon
Ra`mon;
I did not think anyone could top Rod this eve;
-but-
you may have managed to do just that.
I don`t care if Al moves to pg;
he will be the same person, the same player.
If OKC moves K.Durant to Center next season;
will his trade value diminish ?
If Doc make Rondo the 6th man next yr
will his trade value diminish ?
By the same logic:
If the Nets move Johan Petro to [2] guard next yr
will that increase his trade value ?
No / No / & / No … !
They will all still be the same person, the same player.
High-sider
June 4th, 2012
11:29 pm
I hope you [bloggers] out there in [the] “Blogland” [blog-o-sphere] see [Russell] Westbrook for the ball hog he [really] is. This dude’s [Westbrook] an [arrogant] as-hole.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
11:39 pm
G’Dad, he may be the same person, but the guy guarding him will not have the same responsibility as normal when he’s guarded by a Center. For instance, if the Hawks were playing the Clippers, with Horford at the center position, he will have that mid range shot available all game long. Because a center such as Jordan (Mcgee, Hibbert, and many others) are going to sag off of Horford so they can still help defend the lane, because they are their teams’ last line of defense. However. If Horford is playing the PF position (similar to Horford against Orlando and Chicago last season), he will have a PF guarding him, who isn’t the rim protector for his team, so he will be allowed to stay on Horford the entire possession, or simply switch if in a pick and roll situation. That extra 4-5 feet is all the difference between a good shot and a tough shot for someone who has not shown the ability to create their own shot. Right now, the perception around the league is that Horford is out of position at the Center position because they have yet to see him play that position and only sees his height. But given an entire season of Horford playing majority of his minutes at the PF position, and not having his best offensive shot available as often as he does at the C position, shooting efficiency will go down dramatically. Remember, Horford doesn’t play for a coach who is a master at getting his best players easy shots, so there will not be any adjustments through out the season for this to be a trend, and not a new way of life with the Hawks. Now you being a coach, and not understanding the magnitudes of match ups by the OTHER team, is disheartening, and that’s the comment of the night.
Ra'mon
June 4th, 2012
11:41 pm
HS, I would hate to see Westbrook end up with a ring this season.
High-sider
June 4th, 2012
11:49 pm
Will [Derek] Fisher get his 6th [NBA] championship [ring] before [Kobe] Bryant? I guess it’s too early to tell.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 4th, 2012
11:59 pm
Tracy McGrady @Real_T_Mac
Wish I had that in my prime..
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite
Tracy McGrady @Real_T_Mac
That’s gotta be a great feeling to have multiple weapons on one team like OKC!
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite
Rod from College Park
June 5th, 2012
12:04 am
Grandad,
So are you saying that you think John Wall is a great point guard?
High-sider
June 5th, 2012
12:10 am
Ra’mon, I know I’m about to commit blasphemy on this blog but, of the four teams left in the NBA playoffs, I would rather see the Heat win the championship this year. I hope I won’t be banned [from this blog] for saying this. [LOL]
Ra'mon
June 5th, 2012
12:14 am
John Wall is a great athlete who’s playing basketball right now.
Grandad
June 5th, 2012
12:15 am
Ra`mon
1st of all;
I do not think the situation will be as dire as you say.
In motion offense … a player who understands
how to move w/o the ball, will get open.
Our blog brethren, constantly speak of getting one`s own shot,
w/o ever mentioning moving w/o the ball.
Everything is dribble, dribble, dribble.
Moving w/o the ball and coming off screens is a skill also,
one that Al possesses.
Moving w/o the ball is a skill that Josh does not possess;
much like screening, Josh does not pick and roll `cause
Josh doesn`t [fundamentally] understand how to screen.
After all that:
Any team will want Al.
Yeasterday, Today, Tomorrow – regardless !
Grandad
June 5th, 2012
12:16 am
And Yes;
Al & Teaguer will / would run the P & R effectively !
-guaranteed-
Ra'mon
June 5th, 2012
12:24 am
G’dad, have we ever seen Josh play in a system that emphasized moving without the ball? From what I see, no one since Chillz left moves effectively without the ball on this team. And you speak of a motion offense, but where do you see a motion offense being ran? LD said that just to get hired. He ran that for two weeks in his first preseason, and we haven’t seen it consistently since then.
High-sider
June 5th, 2012
1:00 am
Actually, Jerry West’s likeness is the NBA logo.
cp
June 5th, 2012
1:15 am
@O’Brien. The Hawks are waiting until the pre draft camp is over to work prospects out. It was reported last week I think.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
1:38 am
Bleacher Report had a trade suggestion of:
Denver sends ATL Wilson Chandler, Mozgov, Harrington and the #20 pick for
Josh Smith
I’m not interested, how about ya’ll?
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
1:43 am
Bleacher did rightly point out that:
1) George Karl would definitely benefit Josh – I can’t argue with that
2) A Javale McGee/Josh Smith backline would be very entertaining. Can’t argue with that either.
Now Kenneth Faried/Wilson Chandler for Josh, now I’m listening. Throw in a 1st pick, and I gotta take a serious look at that.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
1:46 am
What ya’ll think Hibbert brings on the open market (RFA)? 8,9, 10 mill per year? He’s not a max player, is he? I don’t think so. But people do overpay for decent C’s. And Hibbert was a real difference maker this year, with the lack of C’s in the League and everything.
I wonder what George Hill will bring on the open market?
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
1:49 am
NBA draft has us taking Jeff Taylor #23. I could see that. I like that pick. Pretty safe and solid.
Draftexpress has us taking Moultrie – more potential, but probably less safe.
I like Taylor’s work ethic. I think he takes Marvin’s spot when Marvin leaves, and maybe does a better job.
He probably won’t fall down nearly as much for one thing.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
1:52 am
NBA Mock has Nicholson going to the Celtics at #21
And us getting Darius Miller at #43 – I like that pick also if he’s there. He’s got an NBA build.
Include Marvin for Al Harrington in a Nuggets trade? Al is cheaper per year, but has 1 more season on the contract.
I’m for re-signing Ivan.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
1:57 am
Wroten at #35 in the NBA Mock – I could see Sund trading up or down to get him. Up from 43, or down from 23.
I could see Sund trading #23 for #30 and 35 from GSW, and maybe a 2nd pick next season from them also.
30 is the lowest he can trade too this season – We have to have a 1st pick according to League rules.
And my OKC/Miami finals with OKC as champions is getting close – been predicting that since last offseason.
I hope i’m right – can’t stand Miami
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:02 am
Ra’mon – I’m a Horford fan, but I think people do forget how he looked against Orlando and Chicago playing PF in the playoffs last season. Not good – not quick enough to handle PF’s on O or D. I remember this blog seeing the same thing. It caught me off guard that Al looked so awkward at PF.
Now I’m not saying he couldn’t improve. But I know how he looked then.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:07 am
Grandad – I do agree with you point on stats not telling the whole story – that a trained eye can see if someone can play BB or not.
That’s how I knew Teague could play unlike Acie. You could just tell watching him, he changed the whole temp of the game when he came in on O and D.
Teague’s got a chance to be a pretty good PG in this League. I’ve said 15 and 7 good in a couple of years. His ceiling actually may be a tad higher than that.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:12 am
HS – I know your point about Westbrook – and he is a ball hog, bad. I’d still rather see Durant, DFish, Perkins, Ibaka, Thabo, Nazr and the crew win over LeBron. I just couldn’t stand that Free agent Big 3 thing.
And Riley is getting on my nerves signing the best midlevel available in the offseason’s, and the vet’s coming down to get a ring.
Give me OKC this season, and then maybe the Griz next season.
Thats if the Hawks can’t win it.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
2:13 am
Ra’mon
June 4th, 2012
11:39 pm
G’Dad, he may be the same person, but the guy guarding him will not have the same responsibility as normal when he’s guarded by a Center. For instance, if the Hawks were playing the Clippers, with Horford at the center position, he will have that mid range shot available all game long. Because a center such as Jordan (Mcgee, Hibbert, and many others) are going to sag off of Horford so they can still help defend the lane, because they are their teams’ last line of defense. However. If Horford is playing the PF position (similar to Horford against Orlando and Chicago last season), he will have a PF guarding him, who isn’t the rim protector for his team, so he will be allowed to stay on Horford the entire possession, or simply switch if in a pick and roll situation. That extra 4-5 feet is all the difference between a good shot and a tough shot for someone who has not shown the ability to create their own shot. Right now, the perception around the league is that Horford is out of position at the Center position because they have yet to see him play that position and only sees his height. But given an entire season of Horford playing majority of his minutes at the PF position, and not having his best offensive shot available as often as he does at the C position, shooting efficiency will go down dramatically. Remember, Horford doesn’t play for a coach who is a master at getting his best players easy shots, so there will not be any adjustments through out the season for this to be a trend, and not a new way of life with the Hawks. Now you being a coach, and not understanding the magnitudes of match ups by the OTHER team, is disheartening, and that’s the comment of the night.
************************
So how do you explain his performance vs Boston?
Despite Horford playing center, the guy that was guarding him most of the time was either Kevin Garnett or Ryan Hollins. Regardless of position, the Boston frontline doesn’t just let anyone score on them.
And before you even say it, Horford only hit 5 midrange jumpers vs Boston.
Five.
The other 10 shots he made in that series came within 6 feet of the basket. And he was flat out dominant in the 4th quarters of Game 5 and 6, going 9 – 11 FG.
He shoots 59% in the series.
Explain how he did that vs the Boston frontline please?
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:13 am
I’m not sure the Nuggets won’t be a darkhorse next season either.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
2:14 am
That should’ve said the other 15 shots he made in that series.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:16 am
NC – In fairness, I do think he had fresh legs for the Boston series – the body, while weak from the injury, and the lack of playing time, didn’t have the normal bumps and bruises of a brutal season – compressed schedule and all.
He was fresh, and it was only a 2 game sample. But I do admire him for coming back. But he had not gone thru the grind of this regular season.
I saw that alot this season – Lucas from Chicago etc. – when the fresh legs came in, mediocre players (and Al is not mediocre by any stretch) could for awhile outplay more talented players, simply because of the fresh legs.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:18 am
Al average 15.3 and 9+ rbs a game his last full season. I could see 18 and 9 from him full time at PF. He’ll only get better I would think.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
2:23 am
And I agree with Grandad about Al – Al knows BB, and is fundamentally sound. Knows what position to be in with and w/o the BB in his hands.
And I agree with others that say he is somewhat robotic, and is not a fluid player. Struggles creating his own shot. And PF’s in the playoffs last season did bother him
Both are correct to my eyes.
And this playoff shooting % stuff – almost everybody’s shooting % goes down in the playoffs – think about it – your playing better teams in pressure packed situations – of course most players shooting %’s go down. That doesn’t tell us a whole lot – unless it’s drastic or something.
High-sider
June 5th, 2012
2:43 am
SteveW, I hear what you’re sayin’.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
2:51 am
Stats are your friend folks.
4th quarter shooting in the playoffs
- Horford: 9 – 11 FG
- Smith and Johnson: 9 – 31 FG
Can’t have Smith and Johnson taking the same type of shots
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
2:57 am
SteveW, despite the “fresh legs” hypothesis, that’s still the #1 defense in the NBA he was going up against. “Robo-Al” was essentially our closer in both Game 5 and Game 6, because the other two stars on the team couldn’t get it done.
EmirS.
June 5th, 2012
4:38 am
David Alrdridge expects Sund to be back.
No surprise there!
EmirS.
June 5th, 2012
5:23 am
I understand that ALOT of you despise that whole “The Decision” thing and would LOVE to see LeBron fail again this season. But I wouldn’t. It’s in the past. Like most girlfriends/boyfriends from the past….you move on and appreciate other things.
At the moment, I’m appreciating LeBron’s DESIRE to win an NBA ring. I want the guy to win a ring. I know many other players deserve it to, but so does LBJ. I hope he wins it this year. Then if the Heat get Nash next season, then I hope they win it again (that is if the Hawks don’t). One thing I am scared of witnessing…..is him actually not getting one. I would hate to see him in Nash’s position. Nearing the end of a spectacular career with no championships under his belt. That would be awful.
Buddy Grizzard
June 5th, 2012
5:47 am
“I can’t believe anyone could shoot more than Kobe? Is this really true?” – drmaryb
No, I said Josh takes more long jumpers than anybody EXCEPT Kobe. If you go to basketball-reference and go to the shot finder, search for all players, shots between 15 and 23 feet. Then, once it pulls up the list, click at the top of the column for field goals attempted, so it sorts in order of most FGT. The top ten in attempts at this distance, followed by their shooting percentage (plus Joe Johnson) are as follows.
1. Kobe 445 FGA .404
2. Josh 410 FGA .366
3. Dirk 392 FGA .490
4. Garnett 363 FGA .496
5. Monta 357 FGA .401
6. LaMarcus 354 FGA .421
7. LeBron 352 FGA .403
8. DeMar DeRozan 351 FGA .345
9. Westbrook 350 FGA .426
10. Gerald Henderson 339 FGA .401
21. Joe Johnson 280 FGA .404
As you can see, the only person in the top 10 in attempts at this distance that shoots worse than Josh is DeRozan. JOSH TAKES MORE LONG JUMPERS THAN DIRK!
“Memphis needs a closer for some games. And JJ is great at that.” – Ra’mon
As of last year’s playoffs, JJ had the second worst shooting percentage among active players in win-or-go-home playoff games. Not my definition of a “great” closer.
Just Joe
June 5th, 2012
5:53 am
The Decision will stick with me for a while. I’m rooting for Boston and San Antonio first (team play, underdogs facing younger, more talented teams), and against Miami second. If Lebron had stayed in Cleveland, or handled his free agency with some respect for his former team, and maybe a bit of humility, then I’d be his biggest fan. He’s got some growing up to do still. I like how OKC has built their team, but I’m also not a Westbrook fan. I think he leaves before Harden, and the team will be fine.
Buddy Grizzard
June 5th, 2012
6:10 am
“Stats are your friend folks.” – northcyde
Hawks 4th quarter shooting in Boston series, ranked by FGA:
1. Jeff 7-17 .412
2. Joe 4-17 .235
3. Josh 5-14 .357
4. Al 9-11 .818
5. Pargo 2-9 .222
5. (tie) Marv 2-9 .222
Buddy Grizzard
June 5th, 2012
6:11 am
Again, Joe shooting .235 in the 4th quarter for a playoff series is not my definition of a “great” closer.
Just Joe
June 5th, 2012
7:29 am
I still think this trade helps all involved:
Hawks get Derrick Williams, Darko Milicic, and the 14th and 18th picks. Milicic’s contract is a necessary evil to get Williams.
Rockets get Josh Smith and the 23rd pick. They still have the pieces needed to pull off the Scola, Lowry, and draft pick for Gasol trade, with cap space to sign a 2-guard to go with Lee.
T’wolves get Kevin Martin and the 16th pick. Reuniting Martin with Adelman and giving that team a proven, veteran scorer on the wing, plus they move up two spots in the draft.
At 14 & 18, I would target Dion Waiters and Meyers Leonard. Get the best available player in the second round (Draymond Green please!!!). We would still be a very athletic team with Teague, Waiters, D. Williams, Horford, and Leonard as the team’s future, with veterans Joe, Marvin, and ZaZa, and hopefully bringing back Hinrich and Ivan.
O'Brien
June 5th, 2012
7:47 am
SteveW,
I think Hibbert is looking at $10 mil per year. That seems to be the starting point point for solid centers (Nene, Al, DeAndre Jordan).
And for that reason, I think Hawks will have a hard time keeping Zaza (who makes $4.5 mil right now). I can see a team offering him $8 mil to be their starting center, so unless he is the Hawks starting center, I think he is gone after next year.
Include Marvin for Al Harrington in a Nuggets trade?.
The Hawks would come full circle, because we traded Harrington so that Marvin could get the starting spot.
O'Brien
June 5th, 2012
7:59 am
As for the remaining teams in the playoffs…I’m rooting for OKC. If not them, then anybody but Miami.
Ra’mon,
I like Eric Gordon and his potential. However, I don’t think N.O will let Gordon get away (he is a RFA). And with Anthony Davis, Eric Gordon, and the #10 pick, that gives them a head start on rebuilding.
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 5th, 2012
8:01 am
High-Sider!
Your brackets look stupid, and Poop is jealous. You two are stuck on stupid!
Stupid!!!!
Rod from College Park
June 5th, 2012
8:33 am
“So how do you explain his performance vs Boston?
Despite Horford playing center, the guy that was guarding him most of the time was either Kevin Garnett or Ryan Hollins. Regardless of position, the Boston frontline doesn’t just let anyone score on them.”
“SteveW, despite the “fresh legs” hypothesis, that’s still the #1 defense in the NBA he was going up against. “Robo-Al” was essentially our closer in both Game 5 and Game 6, because the other two stars on the team couldn’t get it done.”
OK northcyde. So lets take a 2 game sample size. In the first two games vs the Celtics, before he got hurt, Josh was averaging 19pts, 12 rebounds, 4.5 assist, 2.5 turnovers per game (less than Joe) all while being guarded primarily by one of the best defensive centers in the league. See how easy that is. Josh scored on the Celtics also. It’s obvious Horford has fresh legs, as he was more active than anyone on the floor. He played well, but should we not expect that from our ALLSTAR CENTER. Especially when Josh Smith and Joe Johnson were the guys that the Celtics were focused on stopping. Lets also not forget that Horford (the guy that shot 9-11 in the 4th quarter in the playoffs) is the guy that missed a free throw that puts us in overtime in game 6. Lets please not forget that. Do you want 9-11 in 4th quarter, or 2 of 2 free throws to continue your season?
Buddy Grizzard
June 5th, 2012
9:08 am
I would love it if Al made his free throws. Would also love it if Josh didn’t quit on plays to argue refs, as if the refs were going to change their mind and it would benefit the Hawks more than, you know, hustling back on defense. I would also love it if Joe Johnson was worth half his salary. But like Schultz said, $20 million doesn’t buy heart.
Dawg
June 5th, 2012
9:36 am
Could/Would Portland be trade partners with us considering their two early picks?
O'Brien
June 5th, 2012
9:47 am
To me, it all comes down to this. Is Josh more talented than Al, and a better PF (offensively and defensively)..Yes (imo).
Can Al Horford (by himself) give us exactly what Josh was giving us as a PF? No.
But is it possible that Al AND whatever pieces Josh brings back in a trade could replace what Josh is giving us? I think so. So there is a possibility that trading Josh could make the Hawks a better team, depending on what we get back in return (just like trading Al or JJ could make us a better team, depending on the pieces we bring back).
And I am a fan of the Hawks, first and foremost (regardless of which players are on the team).
O'Brien
June 5th, 2012
10:01 am
Najeh,
I would roll the dice on Dwight for one year too, but I don’t think that deal is going to happen. Would I love to keep Josh and trade some combination of JJ and Al? Sure.
In the meantime, a Josh and Marvin for Gasol trade may just tread water, but I would rather try it for a year and see. If it doesn’t work, then we have Gasol’s $20 mil as an expiring contract to trade and blow it up completely.
Teague-JJ-defensive minded FA-Gasol-Horford would be the starting 5. And with Zaza (and hopefully Ivan coming off the bench), a bigger offensive role given to Jeff, and a couple of smart signings, I would like to see what they can do.
Boston should be a different team next year, Rose will be coming off a major injury, and who knows what to expect from Orlando, Philly, Indiana and the Knicks, so maybe they find a way to get to the ECF. If we lose again in round 1 or 2, then blow it up. LD”s contract will be up then, Zaza will be a FA, hopefully bring in a new GM, and Gasol would only have 1 year left on his deal, so we could start over.
Astro Joe
June 5th, 2012
10:20 am
Just Joe, I like your trade idea. I had been playing around with a Darko, Derrick Williams and Ridnour for Joe deal.I think the T’wolves have enough cap space to absorb the extra salary and a Love-Rubio-Joe core would likely put the T’wolves in the playoffs for the first time since Sam Cassell and choke-man were on the team with KG.
Here’s the thing about using playoffs to measure individual players. 9 out of 10 players have sub-par individual stats whent hey make it to the playoffs… and the farther they advance, the worse their stats become. It is pretty simple, the better defensive teams typically are the opponents the deeper you go into the playoffs. If your team scores fewer points against better defensive teams, that almost always translates into the better scorers on your team scoring less than usual. If team A is playing a top 5 defensive squad, that top defensive squad typically isn’t focused on shutting down players 4-10 on the team, they are primed to stop options 1-3. Again, maybe 1-10 players can defeat that but the vast majority of players will fail. While Rod’s fasciantion with Jamal is a little creepy, he is right that having a player capable of creating instant offense is critically important in the playoffs. (BTW, I’m 98% certain that Jamal is no longer that type of player, but I digress). So all of this talk about Al not performing well against elite defensive teams is both accurate and irrelevant. IMO, 90% of players are impacted by playoff-caliber defense. What we’re seeing in the playoffs (especially in the West series) is that having 4+ viable scoring options is super important to produce 90+ points/game. Of course, running a scheme that doesn’t require making 18-22 footers all game long would be nice to see also, and having players who can actually execute plays out of a TO would n’t be an awful thing… but again, I digress.
KevinM
June 5th, 2012
10:26 am
Orlando considering Jeff Bowers for GM…did they not watch him trade Oakafor for Tyson Chandler? It was a year removed from reaching the ECF and Bowers was not going to keep Chandler:
7/28/2009 – The Hornets have been trying to unload the 7-foot-1 Chandler for several months. Last season they sent him to Oklahoma City, but the trade was rescinded after Chandler failed a physical amid concerns over a lingering toe injury.
Chandler would have looked nice on that OKC roster and there would not have been a need for Perkins.
But you can tell OKC knows talent. We don’t have anything like that happening at Philips.
Astro Joe
June 5th, 2012
10:29 am
Fool’s Gold
I’m feeling lazy today so I’ll let one of the “I have to see it to believe” bloggers go and do the research, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the Hawks relied on the 3-ball to score more than any other playoff team. In other words, let’s say the Hawks averaged 100 PPG in the regular season and averaged 5 3s per game, that would be 15/100=15%. My guess is that percent (whatever it is) is likely higher for the Hawks than other teams. The Hawks were not a great offensive squad and if they have to rely on making 3s to produce an average amount of points, then that would make it fairly easy to defend them (at least for a superior defensive team).
We need Woody’s offensive coordinator and LD’s defensive coordinator and then we might have the right assistants in place to do something. And add Laimbeer to stand on someone’s throat when they make a boneheaded play.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 5th, 2012
10:30 am
“The other 10 shots he made in that series came within 6 feet of the basket. And he was flat out dominant in the 4th quarters of Game 5 and 6, going 9 – 11 FG.
He shoots 59% in the series.
Explain how he did that vs the Boston frontline please?”
Because he hangs around the basket (a fair criticism of Josh) and gets those shots set up for him, much like Tyson Chandler. Case in point, the beautiful lob Josh threw to him in the 2nd quarter of Game 4.
This is partly why I don’t think the Hawks necessarily have to choose between Josh and Al. I think their games complement each other better than many people think. If you find a way to clear Joe and Marvin off the cap, keep Teague/Josh/Al, and add a #1 scoring option at the 2 or 3 who is actually worth the max, this becomes a dangerous team. The hard part is figuring out how to get that #1 scoring option without a high draft pick, because players like that almost never change teams in free agency.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 5th, 2012
10:34 am
“Denver sends ATL Wilson Chandler, Mozgov, Harrington and the #20 pick for
Josh Smith”
Not a huge fan of Mozgov or Harrington, but I would do Chandler and Faried for Josh even if the Nuggets didn’t throw in a pick. I wonder if Denver would do that.
Astro Joe
June 5th, 2012
10:37 am
The hard part is figuring out how to get that #1 scoring option without a high draft pick, because players like that almost never change teams in free agency.
Why do I find it hard to believe that Josh would welcome some wet-behind-the-ears-youngster joining the Hawks as the #1 scoring option? The issue is more than just finding the player, it is also about the remaining players accepting a role that may not be as prominent as they desire.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 5th, 2012
10:39 am
“Would also love it if Josh didn’t quit on plays to argue refs, as if the refs were going to change their mind and it would benefit the Hawks more than, you know, hustling back on defense. ”
Would love if LD got in the refs’ ear so that players didn’t have to do so. Not excusing what Josh does, but good coaches stay in the refs’ ear so that players can do their job. Look at Doc Rivers on the sideline. Every time they show him on camera he is talking to a ref or to a player. Can’t remember him ever sitting in his seat whistling like LD.
Astro Joe
June 5th, 2012
10:49 am
I can’t help but wonder (given the recent link between Josh and Rondo) if some of Josh’s frustrations are based on pre-NBA history. Like what if Josh was head and shoulders better than Rondo when they were at Oak Hill. I mean, that is fairly easy to see, right? And now all of a sudden, Rondo is considered a potential HOFer and JOsh hasn’t seen an All-Star game?
What if Josh felt like he was a better all-around basketball player than HOward when they played together in AAU? That is possible, right? I mean Josh likely has always had terrific court vision coupled with comparable athleticism (in a smaller frame). And Josh probably has never been straight wretched at the free throw line. I think it is plausible that at one point, Josh was considered the better ball player than both Rondo AND Dwight.
And now?
I wonder if instead of considering how those guys may have improved, or how they may have accepted coaching or how they may have matured off-the-court that helped them on the court, that Josh feels like he didn’t get what those guys received… attentive coaches, loving fan bases and talented teammates. And while there may be truth in all of that, surely there was something that JOsh could have done differently. Surely he isn’t a total and complete victim of his surroundings. Surely he wasn’t powerless to improve his situation and reach another level of performance.
OK, that ends the Dr. Phil segment of the blog.
Sautee
June 5th, 2012
10:50 am
“Sautee, I’m saying if Al moves to the PF, then his trade value will go down. The very things that make Horford productive as a center, are the very things that will become less reliant at the PF position for him.” – Ramon
Ramon, you are contradicting yourself. You say that you don’t believe that Josh will leave, yet your reason (you say) for wanting to trade Horford is that his trade value will disappear after this coming season. If Josh does not leave, why would Horford move to PF? Thus, why would his trade value diminish?
BTW, I’m in agreement, as we have previously discussed, that center is Al’s best position. And you never responded when I posted Al’s interview with MC where he said the Hawks have matchup advantages with him at the 5 and Josh at the 4, that they needed to take advantage of. You had posted about wishing Al would say something about Josh staying. The interview clearly shows that Al is not after Josh’s position, but wanted an additional big body in the rotation.
Buddy Grizzard
June 5th, 2012
10:54 am
“So all of this talk about Al not performing well against elite defensive teams is both accurate and irrelevant.”
How is that accurate? Horford had as many 4th quarter field goals (9) in two games against BOS as Josh and Joe had COMBINED in 11 games between them. I’d say Al performed brilliantly!
“Orlando considering Jeff Bowers for GM…did they not watch him trade Oakafor for Tyson Chandler?”
Kevin did you see this:
http://www.hoopsworld.com/nba-am-kendall-marshall-the-playmaker
Interesting notes about Bower and Dennis Lindsey. Apparently Lindsey is thought to be seeking a team where he will have more control, whereas Bower is known to be able to fit into a situation where he will be one voice among many with Alex Martins having ultimate power.
I said it before… if the Hawks could land Dennis Lindsey it would show the league that the owners are finally willing to step back and let basketball people run the team’s basketball operations. What will actually happen is that once they agree on a salary, Sund will be back for another lame duck year to rubber stamp the decisions of the ASG who will NEVER give up control. They really think they know basketball, these owners who signed off on the Marvin draft pick.
Just Joe
June 5th, 2012
10:59 am
Astro Joe….I’d be in favor of a Joe Johnson trade that brought in Derrick Williams.
Joe Johnson trades:
1) to Washington for R. Lewis’s $13.7M buyout & 32nd pick in draft.
2) to Golden State for A. Biedrins, R. Jefferson & 30th pick in draft.
3) to Dallas for B. Haywood, D. Jones & L. Odom’s $2.5M buyout.
4) to Minnesota for D. Williams, L. Ridnour & D. Milicic (nod to Astro Joe).
5) to Phoenix for J. Childress, H. Warrick, and J. Dudley.
6) to Lakers for MWP, J. McRoberts & S. Blake.
Rod from College Park
June 5th, 2012
10:59 am
“While Rod’s fasciantion with Jamal is a little creepy, he is right that having a player capable of creating instant offense is critically important in the playoffs. (BTW, I’m 98% certain that Jamal is no longer that type of player, but I digress). So all of this talk about Al not performing well against elite defensive teams is both accurate and irrelevant. IMO, 90% of players are impacted by playoff-caliber defense. What we’re seeing in the playoffs (especially in the West series) is that having 4+ viable scoring options is super important to produce 90+ points/game.”
No facisination with Jamal in particular. I just am aware what he provided on this team because he played here. He was our best scoring option behind Joe Johnson last year in the playoffs. Josh nor Al were really scoring options. Teague stepped up, but he was an unknown. So to your point, if we need 3 to 4 scoring options to win in the playoffs unless you are the Heat, with Jamal on the team this year, we would have had 3 or 4, and if you include Horford 5 scoring options. I have to believe that we would have had a much better chance of advancing being that we only averaged 82 ppg. In reality this year we had 2 scoring options, Joe and Josh. Contain both of them, and you force Marvin Williams, Pargo, Green, Teague, and Hinrich to beat you in the playoffs. I’d take those odds anyday. Interesting to know that you are 98% sure that he is no longer that type of player, when he put up almost the exact same #’s in 16 less games, with less mpg playing in a whole new environment, while leading the league in FT percentage. I guess I would be in that 2% (LOL).
High-sider
June 5th, 2012
11:10 am
@drmaryb.(*_*).
drmaryb.(*_*).
June 5th, 2012
8:01 am
High-Sider!
Your brackets look stupid, and Poop is jealous. You two are stuck on stupid!
Stupid!!!!
———————————————————————————-
Kinda like “[Russell]-Westbrook-wearing-[eye]glasses-[without-the-lenses]” stupid? That’s cool [if that's how you see it]. [LOL]
Rod from College Park
June 5th, 2012
11:19 am
“How is that accurate? Horford had as many 4th quarter field goals (9) in two games against BOS as Josh and Joe had COMBINED in 11 games between them. I’d say Al performed brilliantly!”
He played two games and was guarded by Ryan Hollings. He is an ALLSTAR. I would expect him to perform well. Did you see the playoffs last year ? How did he perform then, when teams game planned agianst him?
KevinM
June 5th, 2012
11:41 am
Buddy, makes perfect sense to bring in Lindsey even though they accepted the fact they had to ignore the luxury tax to shoot for the ECF.
The Spurs are paying no less than 20 players to find the best roster head to toe. That isn’t happening here. We are working on mimimum effort here and the owners here would never give up authority. They vetoed BK moves, and are probably doing the same with Sund, although his moves are full of yawns.
Orlando will meet their demise with their decision to have multiple people having to sign off.
I would be satisfied just to never hear Gearon or any or his minions spout off about anything. They truly are not in it to win it.
Astro Joe
June 5th, 2012
11:46 am
Buddy, I was including last year’s playoffs in my statement about Al. Anyone who wants to judge him based on 3 games against the Celtics after returning from a multiple-month injury is just being silly. And those bloggers are also ignoring a phenomenal performance in Game 4 (I think, or maybe Game 5).
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:08 pm
AJ – I do agree that 32 or 33 years old, Jamal is pretty much on the down side of his career.
Najeh – And I do agree that Josh and Al have good chemistry on the court. Folks do overlook that.
And I do see a path to the ECF’s next season – because I do think Boston will be down, I’m not sold on Philly (what happened to Thad Young in the playoffs? Guy disappeared for what Philly needed), and I think we can beat Indy on a consistent basis. Orlando is shot for awhile. And NY has so much drama between Amare’s health, ‘Melo’s conditioning, health, and shots – is Lin back etc.
The Bulls probably lose Asik this offseason, and Rose is gone until the All Star break. Not looking good in Chicago.
The East too me looks like:
Miami
Then New York, ATL, Indy, Philly and Chicago, in no particular order. I could see the Hawks beating any of those teams in a series – even Miami.
Wade will be older. Haslem, Battier, Miller, and even Anthony will be older.
Next season’s probably as good a shot as we get for awhile to make some real noise in the playoffs.
KevinM
June 5th, 2012
12:11 pm
I say Josh should be moved simply for the fact that the ASG will not pay Josh more than Al. Do you think Josh is looking to stay at the same salary level he is now? He’s at 13.2 and I am sure he knows how much David Lee makes.
So if Josh went to the Lakers, he would get that salary easier to getting it from the ASG.
No way we move our all-stars……before Josh.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:12 pm
Chalmers is not a half bad PG seeing the playoffs. Miami is missing a C plain and simple. If they solve that problem this off season with Chris Kaman or somebody, they’re heads and shoulders above anybody else in the East.
My surprise team next season in the East? Cleveland. Then Detroit. Monroe and Knight will be scary one day.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:13 pm
Toronto has the Coach – if they can get some players, they can make some noise as well, as far as making the playoffs etc.
glw
June 5th, 2012
12:15 pm
1) to Washington for R. Lewis’s $13.7M buyout & 32nd pick in draft.
2) to Golden State for A. Biedrins, R. Jefferson & 30th pick in draft.
3) to Dallas for B. Haywood, D. Jones & L. Odom’s $2.5M buyout.
4) to Minnesota for D. Williams, L. Ridnour & D. Milicic (nod to Astro Joe).
5) to Phoenix for J. Childress, H. Warrick, and J. Dudley.
6) to Lakers for MWP, J. McRoberts & S. Blake.
Just Joe, please explain, not sure your reasoning, but what is the fascination with trading Joe Johnson. Sure Joe is overpaid, and disappears in the playoffs. But I am not interested in trading Joe for straight garbage and becoming an awful team. The East is influx, nothing is a sure thing for next year outside of Miami. Sure if we can trade Joe and get a young player and a 1st rounder, ok.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:15 pm
Peachtree hoops asked the question should Ivan be a part of the core going forward to build around. I say yes, in a limited degree.
That guy is a poor man’s Udonis Haslem. I do think his past problems may scare other teams from offering him too much money – I can’t see anybody offering him more than 2 years 4 mill (total), just because of his baggage. GM’s won’t like the risk.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:17 pm
I’d like to see the Hawks keep Ivan for the next 3 years or so. He is 28 or so already, so I’m not sure beyond that.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:19 pm
Been reading some scouting reports. Seems a general consensus is that Tyler Zeller is maybe the safest pick in the draft after Davis. Tons of folks have more upside, but the general consensus is for Tyler: 10-12 ppg, 8-10 rbg, 10-12 years in the League.
I’d take those numbers for a #12 pick or so, especially at the C spot.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:25 pm
I’ve been rooting for the Spurs, but my head tells me OKC, then Miami, then Boston.
The only way I see OKC losing this thing is if a rift develops between Westbrook and Durant like last season in the playoffs.
And could somebody give 30-40% of whatever it is that Rondo has to Jeff Teague, Joe Johnson or somebody on the Hawks?
When Pierce fouled out Rondo mouthed to Garnett – “We gotta win this game”. Now that’s leadership – a 26 year old 21st pick talking to a future HOF’er like that.
Rondo didn’t say it like a plea, but a command – like it’s up to you and me now KG. Now that’s leadership I like.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:31 pm
Northcyde – Would you do a Josh for Al Jefferson trade straight up – especially if we knew we could sign Jefferson after this season?
I doubt the Jazz do that, but they do have a backlog on bigs with Jefferson, Favors, Millsap and Kanter. I’m thinking they may try Josh at the 3.
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:34 pm
OKC may be able to stick together for awhile:
Durant 17m
Westbrook 15m
Harden 12m – or do you think he’ll get the max
Perkins 8m
Ibaka 8m
That’s 60 million for 5 players – but it’s also a best case scenario – some of those guys may command more.
And Thabo has shut down Parker pretty good since game 2. Parker is a beast however, make no mistake about that.
Ra'mon
June 5th, 2012
12:39 pm
Sautee, you are contradicting yourself, not me. You just said it clearly said that Horford wants to play the center position, though reports say those close to him say he wants to play PF (his father). But you say Al doesn’t. Then you turn around and suggest that Josh wants to be traded. Though Josh has never come out and said those words, only reports exist of those close to him saying that. You can’t dismiss one and accept the other. Either you accept both, or dismiss both.
I’ve said many times that I would prefer for the Hawks to keep Josh and Al, and for Al to continue to playing Center. In my mind, the Hawks have three great options, trade neither of them, trade one of them, or trade both of them. I just think as a team though, if you must trade one, because he’s locked up in a contract for more seasons, Al would bring back more in a trade than Josh. And I believe if Joe was to go down for 2-3 weeks again (like he has been doing the last two seasons), that Al would not be able to keep this team with having a winning record during those games Joe is missed. So if Josh is gone, its clear that Al will be playing the PF position. And that’s why many of us always talk about Al playing the PF position, and comparing him to Josh. When the last time you saw someone on here post an idea of Josh being traded for another PF (besides the silly Josh for Bosh that happened last year)? Everyone always say trade Josh for a starting center and a small forward (or Gasol, who they slot in their center position). So if you’re asking me if I’d rather have Josh or Al starting at PF, I’m going to say Josh.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
12:43 pm
Buddy Grizzard
June 5th, 2012
5:47 am
“I can’t believe anyone could shoot more than Kobe? Is this really true?” – drmaryb
No, I said Josh takes more long jumpers than anybody EXCEPT Kobe. If you go to basketball-reference and go to the shot finder, search for all players, shots between 15 and 23 feet. Then, once it pulls up the list, click at the top of the column for field goals attempted, so it sorts in order of most FGT. The top ten in attempts at this distance, followed by their shooting percentage (plus Joe Johnson) are as follows.
1. Kobe 445 FGA .404
2. Josh 410 FGA .366
3. Dirk 392 FGA .490
4. Garnett 363 FGA .496
5. Monta 357 FGA .401
6. LaMarcus 354 FGA .421
7. LeBron 352 FGA .403
8. DeMar DeRozan 351 FGA .345
9. Westbrook 350 FGA .426
10. Gerald Henderson 339 FGA .401
21. Joe Johnson 280 FGA .404
As you can see, the only person in the top 10 in attempts at this distance that shoots worse than Josh is DeRozan. JOSH TAKES MORE LONG JUMPERS THAN DIRK!
“Memphis needs a closer for some games. And JJ is great at that.” – Ra’mon
As of last year’s playoffs, JJ had the second worst shooting percentage among active players in win-or-go-home playoff games. Not my definition of a “great” closer.
*************************
Buddy, it’s an incredible stat on Josh, and you have to place as much blame on Larry Drew for that, as you do with Josh Smith. Josh ranks 2nd on shots from 15 – 23 feet . . . but 84th in percentage made from that range.
When you narrow it down even further, from 18 – 22 feet, Josh was #1 in the NBA with 302 attempts ( despite only shooting 36.1% from that range ). The next closest person in attempts from that range? Kevin Garnett . . . with 230 ( and shot 49.6% ).
In fairness to Josh, he shot 42.1% in 2010 – 11 from that same range on 240 shots. Hawks fans would take that all day, if he completely abandoned the 3 point shot. But his jumpshot can’t be depended on because his shot selection is so suspect. There is no filter in his head on what is a good shot or a bad shot.
Midrange misses are worse when Josh misses, because there’s normally only one person within 15 feet of the basket who will corral that offensive rebound. You simply can’t have your PF taking that many shots from that range, if he’s not making a high percentage like a Garnett, an Aldridge, or a Nowitzki . . or an Al Horford . . or a Pau Gasol.
But the bottom line goes back to offensive balance. For this team to progress, we just can’t have Joe Johnson and Josh Smith essentially taking the same types of shots. Somebody has to play around the rim more. And we all know who that person must be, if this team is kept together.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
12:48 pm
As for JJ’s closing and his playoff performances . . .
God knows that JJ’s shot is unreliable at times, because he has a tendency to settle for too many 3 point shots even when ice cold ( ala Jamal Crawford ), instead of trusting his midrange shot or getting into the paint. And that’s why JJ has failed more often than not in the playoffs. That, and the fact that drawing a foul on a shot is almost unheard of for him. And even when he does get hit, he doesn’t get the call.
Tim Legler while talking about Lebron’s inability to close games, cited that all of the great closers in the game were midrange KILLERS at the end of games. The ability to take and make that midrange pull up jumper, is what normally separates stars from superstars. And while Lebron IS a superstar, his inability to consistently knock down midrange shots is what separates him from the great closers in the game.
Not only does JJ not make enough midrange jumpers in the playoffs, he doesn’t take enough of them at times. And worse, enough plays aren’t designed for him coming off screens for him to get decent looks for midrange jumpers. He makes it bad on himself though, because sometimes you need to just go quick and shoot the damn ball, instead of dribbling for 10 – 15 seconds before deciding what to do.
Joe Johnson from 16 – 22 feet in the playoffs
2008: 28 attempts . . 35.7%
2009: 31 attempts . . 41.9%
2010: 60 attempts . . 43.3%
2011: 62 attempts . . 37.1%
2012: 14 attempts . . 42.9%
Josh Smith in the playoffs from 16 – 22 feet
2008: 21 attempts . . 38.1%
2009: 34 attempts . . 29.4%
2010: 20 attempts . . 45.0%
2011: 38 attempts . . 21.1%
2012: 38 attempts . . 31.6%
Does anybody in the Hawks organization look at advanced stats? People act like stats don’t tell the ENTIRE story, but they give a Cliff Notes version of exactly what is happening. Some of you want to completely dismiss stats, and just go by what you see with your eyes. They both go hand in hand folks. Stats simply confirm or disprove what is really going on.
NekiEcko
June 5th, 2012
1:13 pm
How about this
JJ for Rudy Gay with filler from both sides, then if Josh still didnt want to stay, then trade him.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
1:18 pm
Rod from College Park
June 5th, 2012
8:33 am
OK northcyde. So lets take a 2 game sample size. In the first two games vs the Celtics, before he got hurt, Josh was averaging 19pts, 12 rebounds, 4.5 assist, 2.5 turnovers per game (less than Joe) all while being guarded primarily by one of the best defensive centers in the league. See how easy that is. Josh scored on the Celtics also. It’s obvious Horford has fresh legs, as he was more active than anyone on the floor. He played well, but should we not expect that from our ALLSTAR CENTER. Especially when Josh Smith and Joe Johnson were the guys that the Celtics were focused on stopping. Lets also not forget that Horford (the guy that shot 9-11 in the 4th quarter in the playoffs) is the guy that missed a free throw that puts us in overtime in game 6. Lets please not forget that. Do you want 9-11 in 4th quarter, or 2 of 2 free throws to continue your season?
*****************
We’re not even in position to shoot those 2 FTs at the end of Game 6, if not for the the 5 – 6 FG performance in the 4th quarter by Horford. Josh Smith in the 2nd half of Game 6 was 1 – 8 FG for 6 points . . while Horford went 5 – 6 FG for 11 points in the 4th quarter alone.
But you want to take shots at Horford?
Really?
And Josh needed 41 shots to score those 38 points in those first 2 games for 39% FG ( but I see you purposely left that out ). And of those 41 shots, 22 of them were from 16 feet or more ( only made 6 of them . . 6/22 = 27% shooting from that range ).
Is that the efficiency and shot selection you want from your PF?
Joe Johnson in those first 2 games was only slightly more efficient, needing 32 shots to score 33 points, but shot a far worse percentage ( 31% ), because he was living too much on the outside as well.
But go ahead. Try to find ways to discredit a guy who suffered a damn near catastrophic shoulder injury, and sucked it up enough to not only play, but to play well.
Astro Joe
June 5th, 2012
1:40 pm
Steve, some combination of Millsap and Josh at forward would be easy to defend… just play zone as neither is reliable from 18 feet out. Any team looking to play Josh at Sf better have someone like Dirk at the other forward position.
northcyde, yeah, this pentangle offense has quickly devolved into “who wants to take the first jump shot?” It kind of makes it hard to imagine why a player would work on any aspect of his game other than jumpers during the off-season… if that is what is required as a player in this scheme.
northcyde
June 5th, 2012
1:44 pm
SteveW
June 5th, 2012
12:31 pm
Northcyde – Would you do a Josh for Al Jefferson trade straight up – especially if we knew we could sign Jefferson after this season?
I doubt the Jazz do that, but they do have a backlog on bigs with Jefferson, Favors, Millsap and Kanter. I’m thinking they may try Josh at the 3.
*****************
SteveW . . . in a heartbeat. Jefferson is a legit low post player who isn’t going to spend 40 – 50% of his shots taking jumpers he normally doesn’t make. Jefferson led the league in shot attempts from 15 feet and in. His defense is weaker than Josh’s, although he can and does block shots.
Trading Josh for Jefferson would be a no brainer. The next move I would make is get a defensive minded PF to bring off the bench. That way, if push came to shove, you could put the defensive PF/C on whomever the best offensive frontline guy was, and let Jefferson have the weaker guy.
But a Horford – Jefferson frontline would be a game changer from an offensive standpoint. The other unseen drawback is that for as big as Jefferson is, he doesn’t get to the FT line nearly enough. He’s like a finesse post player, instead of a powerful one, despite his body build.
Gasol is better though, all around.