Atlanta Hawks: Bucks 108, Hawks 101
Vivlamore reporting from Milwaukee. Here is my updated game story, with quotes, from the Hawks’ 108-101 loss to the Bucks Tuesday night.
MILWAUKEE — The Hawks were wary of Monta Ellis — and for good reason.
Ellis scored a game-high 33 points, including 17 in the decisive fourth quarter, to do in the Hawks Tuesday night. The guard, acquired at the trade deadline from the Warriors, was too much for the Hawks down the stretch en route to a 108-101 victory at the Bradley Center.
Hawks coach Larry Drew was worried about Ellis before the game. He might have nightmares about him after the showing.
“He is pretty good,” Drew said. “He got into a roll. He got into a rhythm. He was making shots. He is a good player. We tried a couple different things but he just got into a zone there.”
Ellis hit 7 of 9 shots in the fourth quarter, including the Bucks’ first six points, as they erased a three-point deficit and broke open a close game.
“We let him get into a rhythm and he is a scorer,” said Hawks guard Joe Johnson, who missed most of the first quarter to get five stitches inside his lip. “In this league, if you let scorers get into a rhythm they will pick you a part all night long. I thought down the stretch, individual defense just wasn’t that great.”
The Hawks (30-21) had a four-game win streak snapped and lost for only the second time in the past eight games. They dropped to 28-4 when scoring 90 or more points. Josh Smith led the Hawks with 30 points and 18 rebounds, including 15 points in the second quarter for his 24th double-double this season. Ivan Johnson had 17 points, hitting all seven of his field-goal attempts, including a 3-pointer. Jeff Teague had 15 points, Marvin Williams and Johnson had 11 and Kirk Hinrich had 10 to round out the double-figure scorers.
The Bucks (23-27), fighting for a playoff spot, snapped a two-game losing streak while playing their fifth game in six days. They also received 18 points from Brandon Jennings and 16 points from Drew Gooden.
As much as Ellis hurt the Hawks, they can point to turnovers as their true killer. The Hawks turned the ball over 22 times – 10 in the first quarter and three crucial times in the fourth quarter. Teague had seven turnovers.
“It wasn’t them scoring baskets, it was us taking care of the ball,” Teague said. “I put a lot of that on me. We had a lot of turnovers early and key turnovers late. I had a lot of those. That was the difference tonight.”
The Hawks entered the game fifth in the NBA in fewest turnovers per game at 13.98. Drew said his team “shot ourselves in the foot” with the carelessness.
“We can’t expect to win a game, especially on the road, if we are going to turn the basketball over at that rate,” Drew said.
The Hawks used a 17-4 run to close the third quarter, erasing an eight-point halftime deficit, and took a 79-78 lead. Teague’s short jumper with 8.9 seconds remaining in the third quarter gave the Hawks their first lead since they led 17-16 with 5:46 remaining in the first quarter. Six different Hawks scored during the third-quarter run.
Then Ellis took over.
The Bucks jumped on the Hawks midway through the opening quarter. They ended the period on a 15-6 run to take an eight-point lead at 31-25. The Bucks shot 53.8 percent in the first quarter with Ellis leading the way with 10 points.
The Hawks, by stark contrast, shot only 39.1 percent from the field and committed 10 turnovers. Johnson played only the opening two minutes, 18 seconds of the first quarter after leaving to get stitches inside his lip when he collided with teammate Zaza Pachulia. He returned early in the second quarter.
The Bucks built a 17-point lead in the second quarter before Smith caught fire. Smith was accessed a technical foul early in the period after shouting “And one” to an official after scoring an inside basket in which he thought he was fouled.
Smith, who scored only two points in the first quarter, had 17 points at the half. He scored 13 of the Hawks’ final 17 points of the second quarter — including the final nine — to trim the disadvantage back to nine points at the intermission, 55-46.
“I was trying to be efficient and get some stuff to the basket,” Smith said. “Then, I was able to recognize what I was doing wrong on my jump shot and I was able to correct it.”
The Hawks were playing their fourth game in five days — including Sunday’s four-overtime thrilling win over the Jazz. They return home Wednesday to host the Bulls.
It will be a short turnaround to forget the damage done by Ellis, who scored just four points Monday in a loss to the Knicks.
“We were looking at different matchups,” Drew said. “We were just trying to give him a different look. We didn’t want him to get comfortable with the same guy guarding him. We do that quite often to try to take a guy out of his rhythm, out of his timing. Tonight, it didn’t work.”
Tell us what you think about the site
Customer Care »
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
AJC Services
Sections
Other Editions
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
138 comments Add your comment
bucket
March 28th, 2012
10:48 am
Enter your comments here
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
10:55 am
“All the excuses about fatigue and travel are just that–excuses, and poor ones at that. The Bucks had just come off a 5-games-in-6-nights fiasco, including their loss Monday night in NY (while the Hawks rested).There are NO (legitimate) excuses.”
Cosign. Not to mention the fact that the 20 million dollar man was being guarded one on one down the stretch by Mike Dunleavy. We are suppossed to be impressed that he stepped up against Clevaland, New Jersey, and Utah though. How about stepping up tonight, and taking over a game that matters. D. Rose would take over if he was playing. The same excuses will be used tonight, when Joe does not step up. He is tired, plays too many minutes……. LOL
O'Brien
March 28th, 2012
10:57 am
AJ,
That trade only made sense if the ASG felt like they can’t afford to pay JJ for the remainder of his contracr (and I dont think they will amnesty him) while giving Josh a raise when his contract is up next offseason.
Najeh,
With teague’s 3-pt shooting % being so bad for March, it is reflected in his game. I see alot of hesitation when he is open for the 3, sometimes passing it up only to take a contested jumper (from in the paint) instead.
CoastDog
March 28th, 2012
11:00 am
Go Hocks!
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
11:00 am
vava74,
“* However, I think our roster is much better than people give credit for and that with a REAL head coach and a few tweaks, we could contend.”
I am shocked to know that you think so highly of our roster, with 3 LOSERS on it. (TMac, Pargo, and Willie Green)
O'Brien
March 28th, 2012
11:08 am
Rod,
Co-sign. JJ’s numbers are padded by his performances against bad teams. But too often when we play a good team, he goes passive (or they take him out of his game). His ppg against some of the playoff teams (this season).
Bulls – 13 ppg
Orlando – 14 ppg
Philly – 12 ppg
Spurs – 10 ppg
Lakers – 15 ppg
Pacers – 17.5 ppg
Houston – 15 ppg.
The 2 good games he had against good teams were the 34 against Denver and 25 against Boston. He needs to step up against good teams when you’re making $120 mil.
DawgNole
March 28th, 2012
11:09 am
Strong post, vava74 (10:42 a.m.) You make some observations that indicate you are wise beyond your years. I’ll respond to a couple of your points.
“There will be a time (or maybe not) that you will look at sports only as the entertainment product that they are and accept the good and the bad more lightly.”
I’m always delighted with the good, but when you’ve been a fan of the pro teams in ATL for almost 50 years, and they’ve produced only one championship in that time, then the bad far outweighs the good. And you become weary of the same excuses year after year. That’s where I am–and have been for awhile. How many years is enough?
“I think our roster is much better than people give credit for and that with a REAL head coach and a few tweaks, we could contend.”
I don’t dispute that, but it’s what we’ve been hearing about ATL pro teams since before you were born. We’re always just a few changes from serious contention. I think you have to look at the totality of the situation: almost a half-century of competition (154 seasons)–and still only one title (’95 Braves). There remain NO legitimate excuses for those abysmal results.
“I almost had an heart attack during the 4OT thriller and I cannot even imagine if we were competing in the finals . . . .”
Same here, because I really do want the team to win–and that night it earned big-time respect for its resilience and dogged determination. But to become a champion, you’ve got to have effort like that more than once a season. There’s no taking away from that particular victory; what irks me is that the next game–a loss to a weak (and also exhausted) Bucks team is followed by the same tired excuses we’ve been hearing since 1968. Gotta move past that reaction and take the next step, which means no more excuses–not after after 45 years of them. They no longer hold water–and haven’t in quite some time.
I wonder how you took an interest in the Hawks (being in Europe)? Hey, you help give the team an “international” fan base. There’s a positive.
vava74
March 28th, 2012
11:14 am
Rod,
All fair and square…
But your boy just had yet another great night with POR:
J. Crawford 19:51 FG1-7 3pFG0-3 FT0-0 (±) -18 oReb0 Reb1 Ast1 TO2 Stl1 Blk0 FL1 Pts2
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
11:24 am
OB,
What’s even more scary is that good teams are able to take him out of the game with one defender. They are not even having to double him anymore. Tonight, if the game is close towards the end, Chicago will simply put Deng man to man on Joe, and Joe will not be a factor. I hope I am wrong, but that seems to be the trend.
gvj
March 28th, 2012
11:31 am
Rod Those 3 losers are the reason that the Hawks have won many games. They have hit big shots at crucial times plus they are legit players that this team got at a great price.When they are on they make some overpaid players on this roster look like shatt.
darrell starks
March 28th, 2012
11:39 am
Hawks are not playing good defense, this reason for so many close games because of lack concentration and not defending better than what was before, when everybody was on same page, this team was giving up less than 90points a game now lately team are scoring over a 100points game, Hawks must get back to playing tough defense.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rollow lawson
March 28th, 2012
11:40 am
This game falls squarely on Drew. He played his starters too long in this game. Where was Green, McGrady, and Radmanovic? Joe Johnson had an off night. So what. Everyone does now and then. We pulled games out of the fire three times in a row over the weekend. Just remember that the other teams get paid to show up too. The Hawks just couldn’t make the necessary stops on the defensive end. In addition, we sure missed Pargo tonight. He could have done a better job staying in front of Jennings and Ellis. Jeff Teague looks slow as heck on the defensive end. Opposing point guards constantly blow by him. And if he passes up another wide open jumper, I will throw my shoe through the TV.
Astro Joe
March 28th, 2012
11:42 am
Joe didn’t get paid to have elite stats against the best teams, he got paid to make sure the ASG maintain their revenue stream.
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
11:47 am
“Rod Those 3 losers are the reason that the Hawks have won many games. They have hit big shots at crucial times plus they are legit players that this team got at a great price.When they are on they make some overpaid players on this roster look like shatt.”
I am aware of that. You need to direct your post at vava74. Words of wisdom. Don’t jump in the middle of a fight, if you don’t know what the fight is about.
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
11:51 am
OB,
I guess Joe gets tired against all the above average teams. His legs only get weary when The Chicago’s and Miami’s pop up on the schedule. LOL
vava74
March 28th, 2012
12:10 pm
Rod,
You are very amusing.
I never called neither Green nor Pargo losers.
I called T-Mac a loser and although I have seen that his bball IQ is high and still capable of making plays on court, I don’t think I am speculating too much in thinking that his “losing ways” (ie. lack of conditioning, training and professional focus) seem to be at least part responsible for his lack of minutes.
NOTE: I would be pissed too if Marvin was starting ahead of me, but you have to take it as a professional and T-Mac never seemed to go down that road throughout his career.
I am also not letting LD off the hook since I still consider him to be the #1 problem, but T-Mac does not seem to get himself in game shape physically and mentally (I could be wrong).
On Pargo: I questioned his ability to contribute and if he would fit MY VIEW on how bball should be played since his career FG% is atrocious and I thought that he was just a discount version of Jamal.
He isn’t: Pargo always plays with a big pair ON BOTH ends of the court. He may not be a great defender, but he does not take plays off.
Jamal, on the contrary, always seems a bit of an emotionally detached circus act. Unquestionable skills and apparently a genuinely good character but I would not trust him on the battle field.
Green was NEVER the subject of any criticism from me, quite the contrary. His career numbers show that he is a decent and efficient scorer which seems to make good decisions (very low TO averages).
Geemack
March 28th, 2012
12:11 pm
Chris Vivlamore
Any update on Horford?
Will he be ready for the playoffs?
vava74
March 28th, 2012
12:18 pm
Rod,
Going back to your JJ commentary – which I consider somewhat fair since as you may recall, I have been preaching that Josh should be given clear #1 status since a couple of months now.
You said that Rose would have “been there” in the 4th quarter.
JJ has had an excellent month of March with many excellent 4th quarter showings. I am curious to see the updated data for clutch stats on 82games but before March JJ was already “up there” with the best.
Also, tough boy Rose has missed 17 games with nick-nack injuries. It may be a smart/strategic decision but you cannot say that JJ does not do his utmost to dress up even when banged up.
darrell starks
March 28th, 2012
12:26 pm
Teague has to play like he did last night and be aggressive, he will have his bump and bruise and played bad, but it will pay dividends at end, continue to attack Teague and he will become a top ten point guard in this league.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AG
March 28th, 2012
12:28 pm
no team wins all 66 games. Good game fella’s… I would rather have a loss to Milwaukee and a win against Da Bulls!!!!
Section 303
March 28th, 2012
12:38 pm
DawgNole, no excuses? So, the Hawks have to go 66-0 this season? Be smarter than that. Don’t try and spin that the travel, games, and no recovery time is not a factor. Yes, all teams have tough schedules this year, but there is no telling how/when your legs will just not be there. It’s not a PS3 game.
Also, the injuries? Those don’t factor in? ……..whatever. I could go on and on with this. It’s statements like “no excuses” that give the blog world a bad name. But, …..carry on being slow.
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
12:38 pm
vava74,
I won’t even go back and search for the post, but the bottom line is I told you that all three guys were solid basketball players, and good signings for the Hawks, and you did not agree.
As OB posted, JJ tends to pad his stats against bad teams. I have always liked JJ as a player, but he just does not have that inner dog. No way Kobe, Wade, Durant….let Mike Dunleavy shut them down at the end of a game. I don’t care how tired they are. It won’t happen. JJ is paid like a superstar. A superstar should never let Mike Dunleavy, or Monte Ellis contain them down the stretch. It always amuses me when we played Golden State and now when we play Milwaukee with the JJ, Monta Ellis matchup. Both are very good players, but the last two times they have matched up, I have seen Monta post Joe more times than Joe post Monta. It makes no common sense to me for Joe not to take advantage of these smaller guys in the post. That should be the call everytime down the floor until they double, but that is not Joe’s game. He is the only superstar in the league that good teams can easily take out of his game. I don’t know if you get the broadcast with Nique, but he always points this out. When we play bad teams, Nique always comments on how he does not understand why they keep leaving Joe open, or why his defender keeps going under screens. When we play teams like the Bulls, they don’t do those dumb things, and Joe struggles.
O'Brien
March 28th, 2012
12:50 pm
Vava,
JJ has had an excellent month of March with many excellent 4th quarter showings..
Look at his higher scoring games (20+pts) and the opponents;
21 against Sacramento
34 against Denver
34 against Washington
28 against Cleveland
25 against Boston
22 against Cleveland
37 against Utah.
Only 3 playoff teams (and the Utah game was 4OT). JJ’s scoring history is 15ppg (or less) against good teams, 20+ against bad teams.
O'Brien
March 28th, 2012
12:52 pm
In the playoffs, the 2 teams I feel good about beating are Orlando and Indiana. Anybody else, all bets are off.
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:03 pm
Horford Update!
Geemack baby, forget about Horford this year. He is not a horse sir, he is a human being. He sustained a severe injury. For the love of humanity – why would you want him to play this year. Do you even care that this is NOT in his long term best interest?
If anything, I would ask why didn’t his GM replace him for what Sund said was a “make or break” play off run for this core? Kaman was out there for a 2nd round pick, but they go get Daimpeer instead. Tragic!
This team is NOT built to win a title, with or without Mr. Horford. They are expected to win the 2nd round at best, they may do that but, I seriously doubt it.
Sorry Geemack, besides MC is not the person who would know if Horford is returning. MC is not a doctor and has little to no access to this team. He knows no more than we do. MC is a beat writer in name only. He gets player quips only after closed practices while they quickly exit the court. Basically, sound bites and vanilla answers.
That’s not MC’s fault. It is what it is.
Hawks Blog Legend Worldwide Clyde
March 28th, 2012
1:04 pm
LD needs to look at at the big picture. If you want to make a deep playoff push you can’t wear your team out in the regular season.
High-sider
March 28th, 2012
1:05 pm
Rod from College Park and O’Brien,
Here’s a complete breakdown of Joe Johnson’s scoring average[s] vs. every NBA team this year thus far. [Scroll down.]
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/joe_johnson/season_splits.html
vava74
March 28th, 2012
1:06 pm
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
12:38 pm
“vava74,
I won’t even go back and search for the post, but the bottom line is I told you that all three guys were solid basketball players, and good signings for the Hawks, and you did not agree.”
Rod,
This is simply not true.
We discussed T-Mac LAST YEAR when we were talking about Jamal.
Then, we discussed Pargo, who I never called a loser.
AND, you said that you did not like Green that much.
These are the facts, which you carelessly molded to fit your distorted view of reality.
On JJ:
I do not disagree, but for me, JJ needs quality coaching after getting too many years of Woody and now LD.
JJ was never a top dog but was catapulted to that position because he wanted that challenge and by default in ATL he was granted that status and that responsibility (and the corresponding ISO plays).
Back when ATL was a non-playoff team, other teams simply let him play his game at will since no matter who many points he scored, they could still easily beat the Hawks.
Now, with the Hawks firmly established as a playoff team, opposing teams know that they need to stop JJ to win games and consistently make him their target.
It’s up to the coaching staff to make JJ change his game accordingly: less ball possession, less pounding and more rhythm shots.
If JJ started to move more without the rock and hit more shots in rhythmn, that would open his game when he would have some selected ISO plays.
COACHING
Hubie said it during that traumatic series against ORL:
A good coach has get your best players on their sweet spots and put them in position to be effective.
Making JJ run into double and triple teams does not maximize his talent, on the contrary.
ejh
March 28th, 2012
1:09 pm
In the Off season Sund do a sign-N-trade with New Jersey; Send Teague and Horford for Deron Williams.
DWill, Joe, josh(sf), Ivan (pf), Zsa Zsa (C); Bench: Marvin, Willie Green, Pargo, Kaman, Kenyon Martin, fillers.
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:10 pm
Trend Setter!
OB’s post shows a setting trend. It is what it is.
vava74
March 28th, 2012
1:11 pm
The bottom line is:
JJ should be #2 to Josh.
JJ is a 20ppg player not a 25ppg player (he was one season under the conditions mentioned above – on a bottom dweller).
Hopefully, between now and the playoffs Josh confirms his “step up” and JJ thrives in his #2 role.
Not putting any money on it though.
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:22 pm
Ask Sund!
Here are a battery of questions MC will never ask Sund:
What would you say is your defining moment as the Hawks GM?
What grade would you assign yourself in job performance?
Are you a Real GM or just a yes man to the ASKG?
Do you honestly feel you have built a championship roster?
Based on your track record, are you qualified to lead this team to the never seen trophy case?
Why do sell more picks than you make?
Why don’t you just pack your bags and leave if the owners will not allow you to do your job?
Do you care one ioda about the dwindled fan base?
What would you tell the fans as a reason why they should care, support and spend their house payments @ Phillips?
What to the hard core fans have to look forward to, that they haven’t already witnessed.
Why have you NOT signed a bonafide big man when, Josh and Al asked for help inside the paint?
Why hasn’t Teague been given PT and development?
Why did you draft and release Kito Benson, was drafting him a mistake on your part and why didn’t you sell that pick too for money to fix the scoreboard.
Will you do the fans a favor and just leave them alone after your contact expires?
_________
That’s just round one … The tough questions are next.
Astro Joe
March 28th, 2012
1:33 pm
Mary, do you think there is a GM in the NBA that doesn’t have a budget they must follow? Do you think all but Sund have a blank check from ownership? Did you know that each team has a Governor who must approve transactions by GMs… doesn’t that mean that they are all “yes men” to the governor? If you had a $25,000 car shopping budget and your neighbor had a $30,000 car shopping budget, what are the odds that you will purchase a car that will last as long, require less maintenance and maintain comparable resale value?
I am NOT self-employed, if my boss wants me to do option A after I reasonably and rationally suggest option B, then guess what? I’m not jeopardizing my ability to pay a mortgage to hold my ground and NOT execute option A.
Finally, how many GMs in pro sports enjoy complete and total autonomy?
High-sider
March 28th, 2012
1:42 pm
vava74,
Your “Let Josh [Smith] be Chief Cog” theory is turning into a “Let Josh [Smith] be Chief Hog” reality. Josh Smith had a monster game last night with 30pts and 18rebs but the Hawks still lost. Josh Smith attempted 18 field goals [shots] in the first half last night; that’s just too many shots [for the first half] and a number of those shots consisted of “pyrite” jumpers. I don’t like Josh Smith as the number one scoring option for the Hawks. That number one spot [scoring option] belongs to Joe Johnson. Along with that [perceived] “Chief Cog” status you want to give to Josh Smith comes the pressure shots and clutch buckets that he [Josh Smith] would be expected and required to make/convert. I don’t see Josh Smith making those “big time” shots right now with same regularity/frequency as Joe Johnson. Last night, Josh Smith shot an airball three point field goal as the Hawks were trying to make a late-game comeback; those types of [bad] shots can be seriously demoralizing and “momentum-killers” for a team trying to make a comeback. On the other hand, Joe Johnson has made/converted a lot of clutch shots this year in my opinion. Joe Johnson has 1.) made the step back three pointer against Detroit to send the game into overtime, 2.) made the step back three pointer against Utah to send the game into overtime as well as several other “big shots” in that 4OT thriller, 3.) made the game-winning shot against Cleveland and the three pointer to send the game into overtime and 4.) made the clutch three pointer late in the game against Washington to put Atlanta up by one point. The commonality in which Joe Johnson has made/converted clutch shots in those aforementioned games is that the Atlanta Hawks won all of those games. I think the Hawks are better off by letting “Joe [Johnson] be Chief Cog.”
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:45 pm
Geemack, sorry there, I thought you were asking MC, I see now that you are asking Chris. He has less access than MC, LOL! Sometimes, MC and Chris aren’t allowed to travel to some away games.
I guess the plane tickets are too costly for the AJC. They’re cash strapped too. Newspaper circulation is nearly extinct with all the social media available, they rely more on selling ad space than ever now.
Oh well, just don’t expect Horford back this year. I don’t want him to rush back and get re-Injured, he is way too valuable to the Hawks!
Well, we got 15 games left. I’ll be glad when the post season is over.
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:50 pm
Budget Control!
“Mary, do you think there is a GM in the NBA that doesn’t have a budget they must follow? ”
__________
AJ, yes I do! Lakers, Orlando and Dallas. Two have won championships and one has won 5 in the past 10 years.
Astro Joe
March 28th, 2012
1:55 pm
I think some are confused about Joe playing off the ball vs. Josh being the focal point of the offense. Joe clearly is better playing off the ball. And it is especially true when he is at SF and is generally as if not more quick than the opposing player. Also, most opposing SFs are running off screens as often as opposing SGs, so Joe is able to save his legs (and his old man knee) for some late game heroics.
In the scheme of things, the Hawks won’t get past the 2nd round with Joe, Josh or Al in the primary scoring role. At this point, it is all about the better of several sub-optimized options. And (as I have said (ad nauseum), the only way to get a player better than one of the captains is to trade one of the captains.
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:56 pm
Real GM’s spend wisely or go home in round 2. They aren’t told to sell all their picks for cash and then, sign scrubs like:
Jason
Etan
Powell
Magnum
Pape Sy
Randolph Morris
We can do this all day. Real owners have lit scoreboards, not steak houses. Nor say, they are not for sale, then try to sell and, don’t sell. We could do that all day too. Hire the cheapest coach, not play their PG picks when they need a PG. Etc … Etc … Etc …………………
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
1:59 pm
Magic, Stan Kasten, et. al. Purc the Dodgers for 2B, too bad they didn’t want the Hawks.
Astro Joe
March 28th, 2012
2:03 pm
Mary, Dallas’ GM just sold off Tyson Chandler for some fish heads and rice while letting JJ Barea and Stevenson walk. Lakers did the same with Odom (essentially gave him away for old Kardashian videos). Otis Smith had money to burn while the Magic owners opened a new arena. I suspect that he will be constrained now that it is open. But you named 3 out of 30 teams and do you really think that the GMs created that budget freedom or do you think their owners granted that spending flexibility?
Here’s my guess, there is a 90% chance the ASG ask him to return this summer. That should answer all of your previously posted questions about his job performance. It is good enough to keep his job.
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
2:47 pm
AJ, I just answered your question … No disclaimers necc.
Eddie
March 28th, 2012
2:50 pm
The hawks are gonna turn it around tonight! With Deng and Rose out the bulls dont have a chance against the hawks! I think this is a great chance to take advantage of some solid bets, i have a multi team parlay for u that could make u some serious cash so come check out my blog, its free and cud help u a lot! http://nbawagers.com/2012/03/nba-upset-alert-to-use-in-parlay/
drmaryb.[*_*].
March 28th, 2012
2:56 pm
Lux Taxes were used bountifully in a quest to be champions. Orlando didn’t win, but they tried … Tahts on Dwight! We have never spent $1.00, ever!
bigdave
March 28th, 2012
2:59 pm
those Dallas moves were all made in effort to free up salary to make a run at Deron Williams and potentially Dwight Howard. there was a winning agenda behind the wholesale..
DawgNole
March 28th, 2012
3:16 pm
Section 303
March 28th, 2012
12:38 pm
DawgNole, no excuses? So, the Hawks have to go 66-0 this season? Be smarter than that. Don’t try and spin that the travel, games, and no recovery time is not a factor. Yes, all teams have tough schedules this year, but there is no telling how/when your legs will just not be there. It’s not a PS3 game.
Also, the injuries? Those don’t factor in? ……..whatever. I could go on and on with this. It’s statements like “no excuses” that give the blog world a bad name. But, …..carry on being slow.
______________________
Don’t twist my words. Nowhere did I say the Hawks should go 66-0 this season. And I’ve spun nothing about the effects of travel, games, and no recovery. In your only sensible remark, you pointed out that “Yes, all teams have tough schedules this year . . . .” That in and of itself renders the travel/games/no recovery excuse invalid. ALL teams are enduring these conditions. ALL teams.
For the millionth time, ATL pro sports fans have been hearing these same whiny-azz excuses for nearly a half-century–thanks to whiners like you, who can always justify failure. They’re no longer valid–and haven’t been for quite sometime.
I think you have it backward: It’s not the “no excuses” (after 45 years) folks who “give the blog world a bad name”; it’s the whiners and excuse-makers. You of all people should know that.
OK, I’ll “carry on being slow.” Meanwhile, you can carry on with your excuses–that’s what losers do.
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
3:18 pm
High-sider,
Thanks for that post. Pretty much confirms what I thought and what O’Brien posted. Joe averages around 20 or more points a game against the dregs of the league, except for Boston, and Denver, and drops well below 20 ppg against better competition.
DawgNole
March 28th, 2012
3:22 pm
Those are legitimate questions you have posed for Sund, DrMaryB. Can’t wait to see the tough ones. Unfortunately, as you suspect, I don’t think anyone with access to him would have the integrity to speak on behalf of the fans by actually asking him for truthful responses to them.
Rod from College Park
March 28th, 2012
3:26 pm
vava74,
My bad. You are correct you did not call Willie Green and Pargo losers. You actually liked Willie Green, and thought he was just as good as Jamal, and just thought that Pargo was never good, and will never be good. (LOL) The LOSER tag was strictly for Jamal Crawford and TMac.
“vava74
December 21st, 2011
6:04 am
Buddy,
That’s right: Pargo’s career FG% is well below .400!!!!
It’s quite incredible that he has been in the league for so long shooting .388 and without any discernible play making skills.
Last year, we could not find steady minutes for Teague because he allegedly “could not shoot” but this year we will be giving minutes to a guy everyone knows he can’t shoot (better, always shoots, regardless of any consequences, so he takes horrible shots).
If Jamal was Drew’s cocaine, then Pargo will be his met-amphetamine…”
Rod from College Park
December 22nd, 2011
5:43 pm
vava74,
What you need to do is stop looking at stats all the time and watch games. It similar to your dislike for Horford now. When you tell someone outside of Atlanta some of Horford’s weaknesses which we all have seen you post, they will say Horford is an all star, and his stats look good. If you watch games or played the game at a high level, which you did not, you can sometimes see past stats. Marvin’s stats don’t look bad, but he is a bad basketball player. Again before his injury, Pargo was becoming very good, and then he injured his knee. Pargo when healthy was a very good backup point guard, who had the ability to play some two. He was a very good ball handler, low turnover rate, and could knock down open shots (the ones that Marvin misses). He was also a very good player at Arkansas. Willie Green is a totally different player. Not a good backup point, but very scrappy. If you think Pargo, Jamal Crawford, TMac are all out of control low bball IQ talents, but Willie Green is above average, then we really don’t need to debate at all.
vava74
December 22nd, 2011
6:06 pm
Rod,
You are amazing!!!
“Again before his injury, Pargo was becoming very good, and then he injured his knee.”
We are talking about a guy who – for his career was shooting below .400 (BELOW POINT FOUR HUNDRED) and was “becoming very good” at the age of 28 (TWENTY EIGHT).
I am repeating the stats in words since you seem to have a huge problem dealing with numbers.
ummm…
And this same guy – averaging below .400 (BELOW POINT FOUR HUNDRED) from the field – “…could knock down open shots (the ones that Marvin misses)” – The same Marvin who is aged 25 (TWENTY FIVE) this year – that averages .452 (POINT FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY TWO*) from the field – and that will never “become a good basketball player”.
* Note: .452 is better than .388 and Marvin also has been injured but it seems that injuries are only good excuses for guys you like…
With this I am not saying that Marvin is good, only that Pargo clearly ISN’T and NEVER WAS GOOD.
He is a talented guy who does not know what the expression “shot selection” means. More or less the same way that you seem to ignore that .388 from the field is WORSE than .452.
DawgNole
March 28th, 2012
3:27 pm
Astro Joe: “Here’s my guess, there is a 90% chance the ASG ask him [Sund]to return this summer. That should answer all of your previously posted questions about his job performance. It is good enough to keep his job.”
_______________________
“It is good enough to keep his job.” There you have it in a nutshell, AJ. The performance of a loser who never reaches the ultimate prize (NBA title in ATL in this case) is “good enough to keep his job.” Some things never change.
Sautee
March 28th, 2012
3:31 pm
“There are NO excuses for that level of ineptitude, and acceptance of losing by you and too many others will only help ensure that sports history repeats itself in this city.” – Dawgnole
First, you were correct that I shouldn’t have told you to celebrate the range of views on the blog, even if I think that it’s a healthy thing. Pot calling the kettle black. My apologies. I still think you are crossing the line when you tell another blogger: “you SHOULD HAVE said X”. I crossed that line, too, but two wrongs don’t make that ok, by me.
Second, please answer yes or no: Do you think Ivan’s game last night was laudable?
Thirdly, is there ANYTHING between “making excuses” and noticing good effort? For you, if they don’t win, are they beyond complimenting? I just don’t get that.
Fourth, if you think the Hawks are such a lost cause, why do you even watch the games and come here?