9:09 pm January 16, 2012, by Michael Cunningham
Here is a link to Chris Vivlamore’s AJC game story, in which Josh Smith explains his “different state of mind” this season and Larry Drew says Tracy McGrady’s back tightened up after he played eight first-half minutes.
Michael Cunningham, Hawks beat
Coverage of Atlanta’s NBA franchise from AJC Hawks beat writer Chris Vivlamore
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
284 comments Add your comment
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
12:33 am
I mean we lose by 10 to Portland tomorrow and coast to the playoffs would you rather have Bogut and a 7 foot shooter in Leuer or Horford come playoffs.
Should have done the 2 for 1. My hope is the Bucks give up on the season have a bad record and tank and give us Leuer + Bogut. They get to tank for a high pick, get Horford, and for a high pick and maybe a 2nd rounder from us as well.
What say you Hawks fans?
Teague, Joe Johnson, Josh, Leuer, Bogut
McGrady, Hinrich, Willie Green, Vlad, Marvin, Ivan, Pachulia
Leuer and Bogut or just Horford right now whod you all take?
real talk
January 17th, 2012
12:35 am
Tmac is going to the sixers…..lo!!! Just kidding, but it is if LD don’t give him the minutes.
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
12:38 am
“James-Josh-D12 beats any team, because on defense its a nightmare.”
and Dwight Howard is from ATL.
Even if that was equal value for Lebron…Do you think Pat Riley does not know that trade opens up a follow up move from ATL?
Riley is not going to play KingMaker to ATL.
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
12:41 am
“I’m not surprised because we have guys in this locker room who can play,” Smith said. “We have veteran leadership, guys who have been there and done that before. All we need is to keep flying under the radar. The media is definitely not creating a magnet on us and showing everybody how under rated this team is.”
Prove it day in day out and above all in the Playoffs.
Ra'mon
January 17th, 2012
12:41 am
Smith, that trade would make the Heat even MORE of a favorite, because their line up is balanced even more, and their depth would be crazy.
Teague-Wade-Joe-Bosh-Horford.
Prison Mike
January 17th, 2012
12:47 am
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1152765
I’m thinking about trades and came across the Milwaukee Bucks board who I consider one of the more knowledgeable fans out there. It’s a straight up swap for an injured Al for injury prone Bogut. I like Al very much but Bogut fits like the glove OJ used to murder Nicole and Ron that night… Sorry very tasteless of me but I would love Bogut with this lineup.
Grandad
January 17th, 2012
12:48 am
SteveW -&- Smith.Leuer.Bogut
Thanks ! -&- Thanks !
Smith + filler is one thing
Smith + Teaguer is a whole ”nuther” thang altogether.
LAL; Steve Blake, out 2 – 3 wks inj. ? (Hinrich healthy ? perhaps)
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
12:48 am
Teague-Wade-Joe-Bosh-Horford.
Well they’d also be considered any combination of soft, weak shot blockers, and/or undersized. Bosh AND Horford? Two star guys who’ve complained at C. They’d be called Prima donnas in the 1st bad game.
Besides Lebron’s health is insurance for Wade’s injury history.
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
12:56 am
“like Al very much but Bogut fits like the glove OJ used to murder Nicole and Ron that night… Sorry very tasteless of me but I would love Bogut with this lineup.”
Well not without Leuer. they suddenly acquire too many assets. Leuer could be a pf of the future. And they give more touches to develop Jennings and Harris through the fire. Very young core.
And then they could trade Horford for someone else AND WORST OF ALL they get a high pick to reload even more.
Milwaukee is scared that they will end up like us. Not good enough to win it all not bad enough to get better thru the draft.
They get all that they cannot keep Leuer. And we cannot take back bad contracts. The positives and alternatives for Milwaukee is too much compared to what ATL gets.
Leuer AND Bogut
January 17th, 2012
12:57 am
“I completely agree on Davis. He’s my #1 choice, but he’s clearly a 4 and I don’t think Horford is 5. I suppose we could always try to somehow turn Horford into Drummond and go all youth. Good god, this trade makes too much sense. A one year rebuild is entirely possible. Of course this won’t happen.”
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
1:01 am
^from the MIL blog. You cant trade Horford and only get back Bogut it helps MIL to much.
You got to go 2 for 1 (Leuer to become a similar pick and pop version of Horford more range) and Bogut, to make it even remotely close to being mutually beneficial
Like I said they get a pick+ can flip Horford and pick for top picks + youth get more development and Bucks core gets younger (Jennings and Harris)
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
1:07 am
Trading for an all-star big, keeping a potential double double guy in Leuer, and getting a top 5 pick and all we get is 1 big who with no insurance he’ll be healthy?
Need Leuer for insurance, spacing, and depth.. We dont get an equal amount of options. If they dont offer Jon Leuer and Andrew Bogut then they don’t get Horford an opportunity to tank and avoid the playoffs.
If they want to keep Bogut get booted out the playoffs and get a bad pick. Fine but we arent helping them possibly get “Leuer, Horford, Drummond/Barnes etc, Kaman” that’s allowing them to get too much talent sorry
Leuer and Bogut and they keep bad contracts. We add 2 good contracts to our roster this year (Leuer, Bogut)
they add 2 good contracts next year (lotto pick + horford).
That is even in very logical evident manner. 2 positives for 2 positives.
Najeh Davenpoop
January 17th, 2012
1:11 am
” It’s a straight up swap for an injured Al for injury prone Bogut.”
Just when I thought there wasn’t enough Al-for-Bogut talk around here.
Seriously, it is not a bad trade for either team if injuries are not a factor. But injuries are a factor, and I’d rather have the guy (Al) who has only suffered one major injury in his career and has otherwise been very durable for a big man, over the guy (Bogut) who seems to be banged up every season.
EmirS.
January 17th, 2012
1:12 am
LOl @ http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1152765&sid=e593b1042c414a6ba4bd814196d3c6db&start=15
I got this quote from a guy named JustinCredible:
“Bogut is our best player….period. What is our record this year when he doesn’t play? Horford is a better offensive player no question, but *[Bogut is the best defensive player in the NBA.]*”
I left after reading that.
I wouldn’t do a Horford for Bogut trade. I rather take AL and what he gives us then a guy who is constantly hurt. I’m not willing to live with someone whose prone to injury and constantly having to bite my nails whenever he takes a slip.
Prison Mike
January 17th, 2012
1:13 am
Stop it with Lueur. He is a hometown kid ala Josh that the Bucks have cheap for the next 5-7 years. They have no reason to involve him for anything.
Horford being injured is the caveat for making the deal in the first place. He’s as close to Dwight as Atlanta will get considering the Clippers are apparently setting the bar for Supaman trade scenarios.
Teague – Hinrich
Joe – T-Mac
Marvin – Rad
Josh – Ivan
Bogut – Zaza
If we can flip Marvin for even a marginally better 3 then sky is the limit.
Najeh Davenpoop
January 17th, 2012
1:13 am
“that trade would make the Heat even MORE of a favorite, because their line up is balanced even more, and their depth would be crazy.
Teague-Wade-Joe-Bosh-Horford.”
That trade will never happen for off-court reasons alone. The LeBron-Wade duo is way too valuable as a marketing asset to the Heat, and probably alone accounts for more than half the entire value of the franchise. Even if that trade makes sense in basketball terms (a debatable point) it makes no sense when it comes to profits and losses.
Najeh Davenpoop
January 17th, 2012
1:17 am
Another thing about Al for Bogut: Al may not be a “true center” or as polished an offensive player as Bogut, but this is a second round team with Al. Is this any better than a second round team with Bogut instead? Would a Teague-Joe-Josh-Bogut core be any more likely to beat the Bulls or the Heat than Teague-Joe-Josh-Al? I’m not convinced.
If the Hawks make a trade involving piece(s) of the core, it should involve a superstar that clearly elevates this team’s ceiling. Bogut is nice but he ain’t no superstar.
EmirS.
January 17th, 2012
1:23 am
“Would a Teague-Joe-Josh-Bogut core be any more likely to beat the Bulls or the Heat than Teague-Joe-Josh-Al? ”
It would be a Teague, Joe, Josh, Zaza core. Bogut will probably be dressed in a suit sitting on the bench with a cast somewhere on his body.
EmirS.
January 17th, 2012
1:24 am
And what the hell is it with Howard wanting to join the Clippers now too!? Seriously?
F*ck him. I hope the Bulls or Thunder win the Championship this season. Or our HAWKS!
EmirS.
January 17th, 2012
1:25 am
^Or the Lakers…I want Kobe to get that sixth NBA ring!
Ra'mon
January 17th, 2012
1:37 am
I know the deal may not happen. But if the Heat don’t win a championship this season, Lebron will be secretly made available.
Ra'mon
January 17th, 2012
1:43 am
Charles Barkley just changed his statement!! He just said that “As I said a couple of weeks ago, the Hawks are only going to go as far as Josh Smith carries them!” The other week he said Joe Johnson, lol.
And Kenny chimed in that Josh is the only Hawks player with UPSIDE.
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
2:04 am
EmirS he is probably an ATL Hawks fan. He doesn’t want a team without a superstar. Zing?
CP3 + Blake + Dwight = 2 stars.
———–
Is this any better than a second round team with Bogut instead? Would a Teague-Joe-Josh-Bogut core be any more likely to beat the Bulls or the Heat than Teague-Joe-Josh-Al? I’m not convinced.
Seriously depends on if you start Marvin.
Jon Leuer is looking like a mini-Horford right now. His defense is surprisingly good despite wingspan, good IQ, good jumper, yet at 7′0 he can hit the jumper off the dribble too.
Now with the losing record Does MIL value him that highly? Do they see him as a non negotiable impact player/core piece?
I doubt it with the way the season is going they might not see it. They only look at wins and losses and ignore advance stats.
Offense & Defense Rating
118 103 16.2%
118 105 17.9%
One is Horford one is Leuer. SMDH. A smart undersized basketball player is still undersized.
Overrated.
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
2:08 am
Seriously why is Leuer’s rookie Win Share % numbers anywhere near Horford’s wins shared% from 3years in . SMDH.
Talk about overrated potential. A simple 2nd round 7 footer with toughness and a jumper can win just as much as Horford.
If Leuer is close to Horford and we’re still talking Bogut vs Horford. Get out of here. Make the Leuer + Bogut for their right to tank and they earn a high lotto pick and also get rights to Horford.
Smith.Leuer.Bogut
January 17th, 2012
2:09 am
Ra’mon
“Charles Barkley just changed his statement!! He just said that “As I said a couple of weeks ago, the Hawks are only going to go as far as Josh Smith carries them!” The other week he said Joe Johnson, lol.
And Kenny chimed in that Josh is the only Hawks player with UPSIDE.”
What? Source?
Ra'mon
January 17th, 2012
2:35 am
Smith, it was on Inside the NBA after the game.
dc
January 17th, 2012
4:43 am
What happen to that rookie Keith Benson? They should have kept him.
Buddy Grizzard
January 17th, 2012
6:42 am
dc – Agree I’d like to have another look at Benson… obviously a project but he blocked some shots in the preseason. Obviously Drew is not looking to develop Sloan… he’s going to go with the veteran Pargo until Kirk comes back. So it’s time to move Stack to assistant coach, send Sloan to the D-League and start looking at players like Benson who fill a need. Sloan has no role here. Stack has no role here other than motivational speaker (we’ve got the role of aging wing who can’t buy a basket covered).
Bigman needed
January 17th, 2012
7:01 am
Look at dallas, struggling to control paint without chandler, boston have weak interior without perkins.
You have got to have a quality bigman.
D12 only got 8pts against chandler yesterday.
And quality bigman does not include bogut, too injury prone, not physical enough, inadequate defense
Bigman needed
January 17th, 2012
7:04 am
Bogut and kaman are decent offensively, but we dont need more offense. We need interior defense, toughness, rebounding
vava74
January 17th, 2012
7:05 am
This was strictly a cruise control win, so everyone should stop worrying like fools.
You could see that the Hawks would have no difficulty holding off the Raptors’ runs and simply were simply going through the motions. As a fan you can object but with this condensed schedule, they went scrimmage mode.
As for the “Al”, “no Al” debate, this is a complete nonsense.
I am very critical of Al’s decaying spunk (which seemed to improve a bit this season since he realised that he is no longer getting as many open looks as last year and was going to the block with a bit more decision) but we are clearly a better team WITH AL.
Nonetheless, that does not mean that we cannot get by without him and I think that Sund does not need to overreact.
Let’s wait for the recovery prognosis following today’s surgery to know where we are for the playoffs (by the way, I have absolutely no doubt that we will be in playoffs and under no circumstance lower than the #6 seed).
CHI, MIA, ORL, PHI and IND are the only teams able to finish with a better record than us.
BOS are washed up and have no bench.
NYK are fools’ gold and their only hope is to fire D’Antoni TODAY.
The rest are sub-sub-sub-par with no chance of worrying us.
The key for our season will be Teague and Josh’s consistency.
The Minny game showed that a couple of bad calls from the refs still completely derail Josh.
His shot was not falling but his 1st quarter was ALL HUSTLE and then he went into a funk due to several horrible calls.
I am worried that against better opposition we will continue to be diced by the refs and Josh will not gather himself and continue to disappoint (usually on national TV).
Hence, this game against POR will be a good test since:
a) Aldridge is balling and is a bad match up for Josh;
b) Wallace poses HORRIBLE match up problems (V-Rad can’t defend him and Marvin… well, looks Marvin again);
c) The mummys (Thomas and Camby – which hopefully may remain inactive) are manning the middle by committee well on rebounding, with a good combo of length (which we lack) and girth/toughness (which we have but may not be enough since Ivan is undersized);
d) Batum is on fire and we have a lot of problems when a good 6-man comes in (see games in the past in which Maggette, Nate, … destroyed us);
e) Jamal may be motivated against us (although he is shooting like crap right now).
f) Felton is always a tricky match up for us as well.
If we don’t bring our defensive A game, we will be in major trouble from tip off. Sincerely, I am seeing a remake of the HOU game: we start slow and play catch up without being able to recover from the deficit.
Another factor is Teague finishing at the rim. If Camby does not play, we should be a bit better, but Teague is still finding his comfort zone at the glass and we need him to keep Felton in check and deep into his paint with his penetration.
My prediction: POR by 8
Bigman needed
January 17th, 2012
7:34 am
Portland is not the same squad without camby, been losing. Quality bigman might be the most important yet underated position in nba
O'Brien
January 17th, 2012
7:47 am
Najeh,
At least I think it was DeRozan — with the Hawks refusing to fix their scoreboards it’s impossible to know who is on the floor for the other team unless I know their numbers already.
The ASG believe fixing the scoreboard will put them in luxury tax territory.
Lea
January 17th, 2012
7:53 am
Lets be real folks, joe and josh have been stepping up all season, AL’s injury has nothing to do with that. Al’s rebounding has been pretty bad at the start of the season if you look at what he usually gave us. These guys we gave healrhy have heart and will play hard night in and night out.
O'Brien
January 17th, 2012
8:02 am
As for the game, its good to beat the teams you’re supposed to. Joe, Josh and Teague did what they need to do.
It will be interesting to see how they perform against good teams.
If Josh keeps up these numbers, and Hawks keep winning, he will get some all star consideration (although he probably wont make it).
Josh Smith.....roflamo
January 17th, 2012
8:03 am
Our last coach was a complete boob. Anyone who saw Teague at Wake Forest knew the guy could ball. This rite of passage BS has gone the way of the dinosaur. You pay a guy big bucks, u gotta play em. We lost two years with Teague on the bench. Good that josh Smith saw the writing on the wall…..he woulda been gone without a new attitude.
Chu
January 17th, 2012
8:54 am
Mark Stein’s power ranking:
“ATL, rank 12th (last week, 6th): a shame it happened so soon after those big wins over Miami and Chicago, but there’s no getting around it: Atlanta just lost the guy on the roster closest to irreplaceable, because Al Horford ranks not only as its best big man but also its smartest player”.
Who I may be close to reality: the press, coaches, and players that recognize Horford’s value or some bloggers here who said otherwise?
vava74
January 17th, 2012
9:18 am
Chu,
Al is a very good player, but he is not as great as the press seems to want to make of him.
He is a disciplined and smart player who is versatile and brings very good effort (although less than before) and seldom takes bad shots or makes bad decisions (he is, however, a very slow decision maker, specially when looking to score).
He lacks, however, the physical tools and the offensive moves to work as a trully effective PF as he would prefer to.
So that “unwillingness” to acknowledge that his move to the PF is detrimental to the maximisation of his ability is a negative point.
This is specially true since he stopped being focused in banging and he has been looking to be a finesse player but without the skill set.
This year, he was already having trouble finding the clean looks from the elbow and the baseline that allowed him to score more last year (even against Cs).
Unfortunately for us, Al is a smart enough kid and was already – IMO – trying to get to work a bit more down low but now, with this injury which may have a negative effect on him psychologically, he will again be less inclined to bang.
SteveW
January 17th, 2012
9:33 am
Really we are 3-1 without Horford. He only played 5 minutes in Indy.
KCG
January 17th, 2012
9:37 am
The Hawks are better without Al? Didn’t the Hawks have Josh and Joe 3 years without Al and were in the lottery all 3 years. How soon do we forget that the Hawks playoff run started after Al was drafted. This team was not even close to a playoff team before then. I credit Josh for his hardwork in the off season but why has it taken 8 years? I hope that him and the Hawks can keep it up until Al comes back.
harryia the hawk
January 17th, 2012
9:40 am
You know, very dissapointed in tmacs soft mindset. Just play through it. It’s not like hed is a superstar, he gets worse then bench him.
waive tmac
January 17th, 2012
9:42 am
Time to waive soft mcgrady. He refuses to play through any pain whatsoever.
mcgrady=has been
January 17th, 2012
9:43 am
Tmac=soft cry baby. justy retier you has been
SteveW
January 17th, 2012
9:44 am
You know, we can sit here and convince ourselves of trades etc. but the fact is Milwaukee may not trade Bogut. So complaining about Sund, or basking in the virtues of the supposed trade is really pointless. Sund may have called already and been rejected, and we may never know.
And Leuer was only averaging 7 and 4 last I checked. In what 11 or 12 games? Let’s see where he’s at after 50 games. He may be awesome, he may not, we’ll see.
doc
January 17th, 2012
9:44 am
with al out there are fewer people to defer to or “trust” so it takes that pressure off and it works against poor teams. with al out there are fewer options especially when both jj and josh throw bricks and refuse to take it inside. we will suffer with al gone to some degree as we struggled against two pretty worthless teams, but i add we have done that with al in there when josh and jj do the same thing. though al may be a stabilizer, josh is still the straw for this team and jj along for the ride. if josh behaves and survives physically and mentally, then we do all right, a bit above .500.
vava74
January 17th, 2012
9:44 am
horrible redaction, but you get my drift
mcgrady=has been
January 17th, 2012
9:44 am
Tmac shouldnt see another minute on the floor as a hawk. Dude is a washed up soft has been
mcgrady=has been
January 17th, 2012
9:45 am
what redaction?
mcgrady=has been
January 17th, 2012
9:46 am
Tmac is finished. Time to retier his soft butt
doc
January 17th, 2012
9:47 am
t mac has always been injured or disappeared when needed; so why should that change in the twilight of his career? granted he is fun to watch when he is good but he is also as unreliable as cocaine for your overall sanity as a hawks fan.