Atlanta Hawks: Back to (serious?) business

Los Angeles–Near the end of the Hawks’ shootaround at Madison Square Garden last week, L.D. watched Bibby, Joe, Al, and Josh playing some kind of game (I haven’t exactly figured out the rules but making shots seems to be a secondary goal to keeping the ball in the air with tip shots).

“You ever see that ‘Twilight Zone’ episode, ‘Kick the Can?’” L.D. asked. “That’s what this is right here.”

That classic episode involves old folks who get to be children again and use the opportunity to play games. L.D. was saying the Hawks are a bunch of big kids, and spend any amount of time around the team and you will discover that’s pretty accurate.

There is a goofy chemistry with these players. Guys like each other and have fun. It’s the serious stuff they aren’t always so good with.

“This is one of the loosest teams you will find,” Al said. “I think sometimes that can be a good thing for us and sometimes that can be a bad thing.”

There’s no better time for fun than the All-Star game but look at what Kobe did Sunday night. It was just an exhibition game but you could see he decided no one else was going to win the MVP in his building. So he went out and did his thing (with J.J. hounding him when things got serious at the end).

Kobe then had a message for Al: “He told me, ‘See you on Tuesday.’”

Was he serious?

“You never know with him,” Al said. “He’s probably dead serious.”

Clearly the Hawks are a bunch that likes (and maybe needs) to have a lot of fun. But with a tough remaining schedule and fourth place in the East looking like a tough task it’s time for them to get dead serious, too.

I was listening to KG on this subject the other day. It was surprising to hear him talk about clowning around with his teammates since his ultra-intense image doesn’t seem to allow much room for goofing off. How do the Celtics strike a balance between having fun and being fierce?

“When it’s not competitive, then it’s easygoing,” KG said. “I can separate the two. It’s not that big of a thing.”

He makes it seem easy but it the Hawks still haven’t figured it out.

“I hope we can come back in this second half with a renewed sense of urgency every game we play,” L.D. said. “It’s down to 27 games. I don’t care what happened the first part of the season, it comes down to this. We have got to do things with a sense of urgency and totally commit to the team.”

All-Star roundup

Al played just 10 minutes Sunday, second-fewest behind KG, but that was by design. Doc asked him about his health and Al told him his back “is still a little sore.”

“I felt like I played the right amount of time and made the most of my time on the floor,” Al said.

And how is the back?

“The back is OK,” he said. “It was just all about being able to share the experience with the guys and play a little. I’m happy Joe got to go out there and show what he’s got.”

J.J. ended up playing 20 minutes. He was on the floor at the finish after D-Wade (ankle) took a powder. Joe slipped out of the interview area before I could get to him.

Back to work

The Hawks regroup for practice in L.A. tonight and I will file a report after. L.D. said he would evaluate the lineup over the break but wouldn’t necessarily make a change.

Michael Cunningham, Hawks beat

188 comments Add your comment

Rev in Tampa

February 21st, 2011
2:06 pm

Wow, am I FIRST?

Rev in Tampa

February 21st, 2011
2:10 pm

The question is, will Sund do serious work and shore up this team’s weaknesses before the trade deadline?

Rev in Tampa

February 21st, 2011
2:11 pm

MC,

Is there any truth to the rumors regarding Sessons or the Clippers?

Rufus1

February 21st, 2011
2:13 pm

From previous Blog..

Very close to Elite….

Everytime I read an article giving data stating the Hawks are not Elite, it reminds me how close the Hawks are to being Elite.

“They still don’t use Al Horford enough, and they still take far too many long two-point jumpers; only the Wizards, Heat and Bulls attempt more,”

The Bulls and the Heat have some of the best finishers at the rim in the game….The Hawks have none. So why are they taking so many long Jumpers?

“The Hawks are 3 and 4 against the top 4 teams in the east”..Bleacher Report

Only Boston has a winning record against the east elite.

The Hawks have the WORST PG situation in the NBA, but we have won 34 games and have one of the best road record in the League.(17 wins)

We can’t or We don’t is all I hear from the local and national media. The “core” sucks, Marvin sucks, Joe suck, Bibby sucks, josh sucks and Al sucks, but we keep wininng….BECAUSE WE ARE GOOD.

We have won against Miami and we beat the Magic twice.

If Bibby was the PG for the Bulls, they might be a .500% team…..That tells me all we need is a .500 PG to move into elite status(sessions), anything more(Aaron Brooks) the sky is the limit.

I agree we won’t win the east with Bibby playing more the 20min a night and Jamal at the PG, but imagine how valuable Bibby and Jamal would be with a real PG… Creating easy open shots for a team that has won doing it the “HARD WAY”….I DARE TO DREAM.

I believe Sund will make a small trade, because he thinks we are very close and I agree with him….

Go Hawks

Michael Cunningham

February 21st, 2011
2:19 pm

@Rev in Tampa: you mean Marvin to the Clippers? the LA people think that’s a non-starter

the Hawks like Sessions but like with all these trade rumors unless you know who they are willing to give up (and what other teams are offering) then it’s hard to figure who they will get. i mean, if they are willing to give up Josh, and i haven’t heard anything to suggest that, then there are many more possibilities. i also haven’t hear anything to suggest Jamal is on the block, either (in fact I’ve heard the opposite, that they don’t want to trade him).

not trying to be coy about it, that’s just the way it is with these things.

Michael Cunningham

February 21st, 2011
2:20 pm

@Rufus1: what’s with all that optimism? i think perhaps you are at the wrong blog.

Rufus1

February 21st, 2011
2:25 pm

MC

some say that I am a DREAMER….

I do wonder sometimes who these bloggers cheer for.

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
2:28 pm

FIRE RICK SUND

david

February 21st, 2011
2:30 pm

If Sessions or D. Harris gets moved to Denver in a trade for Melo, do you see a possibility of one of those PG and Nene for J Smith? This would enable to get an improved play from the “1″ and move Al to the “4″, his more natural position. Sund might even be able to get an extra draft pick out of Denver in the process.

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
2:30 pm

Once again LD going into hiding about his lineup changes. He’s just so terrified about offending a player. Any other coach in this league would try starting Teague with the BETTER players on this team and seeing what he could do rather than letting him rot with our joke of a bench.

Bibby would NOT start on any other team in this league, and there are at least 10 non-starting PGs TREMENDOUSLY better than Bibby

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
2:32 pm

LOL @ Sesssions/Harris+Nene for Josh Smith.

What team EVER would trade Nene straight up for Josh? And now you want to throw in a former All Star / solid PG?

Wow

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
2:33 pm

Rick Sund thinks Bibby is in his prime.

LOL.

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
2:34 pm

You know your team is in trouble when Ronny Turiaf is better than anyone besides Jamal Crawford on your bench

tckr83

February 21st, 2011
2:35 pm

Rick Sund is doing everything he can most likely, I can assure you he DOES want to keep his job… If anything get new ownership in here.

MC- If they’re not going to trade Jamal… what does the future hold for him and the Hawks? All I’ve ever heard is we can’t afford a new deal with him and letting him go for nothing would make it even worse…

ICECOLD

February 21st, 2011
2:44 pm

Marvin and zaza has to go, so trade those two and mike bibby for devin Harris. and I prefer to get devin Harris some how … so those three and a first round pick , thrn they can give all those we give them and some for melo to create a even better trade…

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
2:45 pm

Give me a break, tckr83.

Sund could so easily trade Mo + Teague for Sessions and get another player from CLE or throw in a draft pick (why don’t we just trade ALL our picks EVERY year? This is the worst drafting team in the NBA)

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
2:49 pm

MC,

If you get a chance to talk to Jamal, could you ask him about his slump? The last 4 games he is averaging 5 ppg, and is 0-10 from 3.

Is it because he’s playing more backup PG? Is it just the typical slump a shooter goes through? Is the trade deadline on his mind etc.

gilk

February 21st, 2011
2:52 pm

I like the scenario of the Hawks acquiring in a side deal whatever Knick (Felton) or Nets veteran PG (Harris) is traded to Denver for Carmelo and Billups. Any idea if Sund is in contact with Denver?

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
2:59 pm

Based on Rick’s comments (and history with the Hawks), I dont think the Hawks will make any moves. Knowing them, they will not get Sessions because his price tag will be too high.

And although Sessions will help us play better, I dont think he is the missing piece to help us get to the ECF.

That being said, I would definitely be okay with Rick trading Mo and Teague for him.

Section 303

February 21st, 2011
3:09 pm

I still think the Hawks will make a move. I will be upset (not surprised) if they don’t. To me, making no move just shows that the ownership/Sund do not care.

27 games left? Where does the season go? The March schedule is great! Going to be some sweet games at Philips that month. I think I will be having my mail forwarded there. I will be there every other day, practically.

man man

February 21st, 2011
3:25 pm

JeJe,
So you telling me bibby couldn’t start for the heat,sacromento,the Lakers in place of D.Fish,or the T’Wolves?Its other places this man could start at.he may be old but he still shoots.Y you think the Lakers haven’t upgraded?

Rufus1

February 21st, 2011
3:32 pm

OB

“And although Sessions will help us play better, I dont think he is the missing piece to help us get to the ECF.”

How much better do we need to play?

If we trade Mo and a 1st or Teague for sessions that will change our entire team.

1) We get a real PG on the team that penetrates and dishes.
2)He get to the foul like 4-5 times a game.
3)Increased points on the break…AL and Josh have been dying to run for years.
4)Joe doesn’t have to guard those quick PG’s, so he is fresher in the 4th.
5)Bench dept increases…A lot more if Marvin is moved to the bench.
6)Jamal can focus on just scoring.
7)Bibby could become a 3pt specialist/back-up PG
8)Improved quickness on the perimeter defense.
9)More open shots for Al on the Pick-n-roll, with a PG who would go to the rim.
10)This would be the best team he has ever played with, he might average 7-9 ast a game with the Hawks.

Finally… We really don’t know if the Heat, Magic or the Bulls are better than the Hawks NOW…so to say he may not be enough to get the ECF is not a fair statement.

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
3:41 pm

Jeje, I hesitate to even inquire about any players that Cleveland has….a Sessions move doesn’t make it much better because we already know his limitations and his salary demands.
Rufus, I dunno, you sound like you understand what Sund is looking at and that a small change is all that is needed because we are so close.
I gotta disagree big time; our Big 3 is not better than any team above us…the closest we get to that is Orlando and 1 DHoward might make up enough of the difference there. Arenas, Turkolu and Richardson have not stepped up yet.
We sound like the only middle of the road team who is satisfied with how this team goes out there and competes. The word elite should not be part of the conversation. And there is a reason why the media this week can only say this team is ‘right in the mix’ of the East, while no one says they can even win a playoff series.

I think they have missed their chance at improving in the playoffs. That ship sailed this past summer with this core. We watch Miami and Chicago blow right by us and they have had zero time to get their chemistry together.
Like Barkley said about Blake Griffin, right now, Chicago and Miami must be getting by on their talent alone and have not learned yet to play basketball. Those 2 teams would not surprise me to be in the ECF going forward.

Bluestreak

February 21st, 2011
3:42 pm

MC,

Any chance the Hawks get in on Nene if Denver hits reboot once Melo is in NY? He would improve our team by having a true C and letting Al play 4. What about Curry from GS? Do you see either or both (dreaming) happening?

The Truth

February 21st, 2011
3:43 pm

Marvin being a punching bag is nothing new on this blog but lets be clear, Zaza should be the real outrage. There is a big difference between under performing and outrageously sucking. While Marvin may have not reached expectations for a variety of reasons, Zaza has been plain sucking for no reason. If the rational for resigning him was based on his age and growth projection, they clearly got hoodwinked because at 27 yrs old he has been on a decline for the last 3-years. His 14 MPG is killing us on defense not to mention his subpar offense. He is ranked 146 out of 219 in efficiency in the NBA so to say he sucks is no exaggeration. His negative impact is one big reason the Hawks are struggling this year. Last year, he stunk just as badly but “The Difference” Jamal was balling so well, it covered-up Zaza’s negatives. This year Jamal isn’t balling at the same level so Zaza negative impact is all so glaring. When he digs us into those familiar holes, Jamal isn’t bailing us out as last year. Zaza might (by himself) be the straw that is breaking the camel’s back since he is always the first big off the bench. In hindsight, the Hawks might have been better off letting Zaza walk and signing a top d-leaguer and gotten better production compared to him, (no joke).

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
3:43 pm

Rufus, you are of the opinion that Larry would just give Sessions Bibster’s minutes?

Haha, I have serious doubt that. Just because we get a minor deal done doesn’t slot that guy into any of the rotation. Larry isn’t going to stop the train to let this guy blow the whistle!

Bluestreak

February 21st, 2011
3:44 pm

I like gilk’s idea of getting the PG that Nuggets get for Melo. Maybe we could get a package together for both the PG received and Nene…

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Atlanta Hawks Buzz, Michael Cunningham. Michael Cunningham said: Atlanta Hawks: Back to (serious?) business http://bit.ly/eCGBrG [...]

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
3:58 pm

With all these ideas about pilfering the Nuggets once ‘As the Melo turns’ is over, you really think Sund has the know-how after 31 years of NBA retention to work a deal that is pending on a major seismic hit on the NBA landscape prior to Sund getting involved?
Wow, I got a good feeling what Sund thinks about our involvement in such discussions. Well, we got a good feeling from him as well how he deals with in-season deals as well, straight from his mouth.

Its a lose-lose for Atlanta fans waiting on Sund to make that major move to improve our chances of ‘A’ 2nd round playoff victory, much less a series victory.

superiorblogman

February 21st, 2011
4:10 pm

Depressing stuff as usual. No help coming and all the GM can do is try to question someone’s heart. You know that David and Goliath story could have been total myth, correct? Meaning Sund is basically looking for a miracle, for Al to grow longer and stronger, the longer part is not happening Sund. For Bibby to become quicker on both sides of the ball, not happening Sund. This has nothing to do with put up or shut up, this is you being old, incompetent, ignorant and broke. Yes, I went there, I said, broke. If a guy Sund’s age is working a job in which he has no more power over the things that happen than Sund does according to you people, he is broke because I assure you that men his age that have it all together are more concerned with there legacy. Sund just continues to take a bowel movement on his legacy by ruining franchise after franchise just so he can collect those pennies.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
4:26 pm

MC, AKA: Sgt. Joe Friday “just the facts ma’am”
is never going to let us in on any trade rumors,
goings on, speculation, chatter, or scuttlebutt…
because he is a newsman and he must verify
before reporting.
Yet;
this is a blog, and he hides behind that fact when using
a more earthy language or nicknames e.g. J-Smoove
as opposed to formal register.
But when it comes to feeding a starving fan base a few
tidbits of information whether or not substantiated,
he reverts back to Sgt. Joe Friday “Newsman” JTFM.

Not trying to be coy, but if there’s a trade;
Najeh, drmayb, O’Brien, et al will break it first.
So, keep reading the blog!

Rufus1

February 21st, 2011
4:31 pm

KevinM

3 Things…

1) I don’t think sund would make a trade without assurances from LD about playing time. LD would have to sign-off on the trade and not playing this person WOULD SEAL HIS FATE for next year….Plus Sund is upset about Teague not playing(His Draft pick), so not playing his trade would unrealistic.

2) It is not our BIG 3, it is our BIG 6. Our 6 are as good if not better than any of those teams “Elite Team”. We our a team that need solid contributions from 6-7 players to be Elite.

3)In the NBA(more than any other League)one players can change the ENTIRE DYNAMIC of a team. Eliminating the weakest link with just a solid players, makes the whole team much better.

Example.
Bibby’s defense, ability to penetrate and free throw situation is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BAD, that if renders the one thing he is great at(Shooting), useless. Playing 30-35min a night at the PG, fighting thru screens, make his legs weak, so his shot is off.

If we eliminate that responsibility from him(Bibby and Jamal), our shooters/scorers get better.

How many minutes a night does Bibby need to hit three 3pt, because that is all we get now.

When Bibby came to the Hawks 2 1/2 years ago, he plugged the hole we had at the PG and we made the playoffs….The next year won 47 games and made it to the 2nd round.

Now Bibby is the whole and we need someone to PLUG IT.

Rufus1

February 21st, 2011
4:35 pm

“Sorry about the errors”

Michael Cunningham

February 21st, 2011
4:40 pm

@Grandad: “But when it comes to feeding a starving fan base a few
tidbits of information whether or not substantiated,
he reverts back to Sgt. Joe Friday “Newsman” JTFM.

Not trying to be coy, but if there’s a trade;
Najeh, drmayb, O’Brien, et al will break it first.
So, keep reading the blog!”

really? i’m not holding anything back. i just like to be accurate. i don’t like engaging in the speculation, conjecture and fantasy trade stuff. if i know something and it’s solid of course it gets reported. if i don’t, then it doesn’t. the hope is that by using this approach i earn the reputation of reporting only solid information and not the tidbits of unsubstantiated info that you crave.

but i think what you really crave is for the Hawks to actually make a move. your frustration about the latter is affecting your attitude about my approach. were i to give you tidbits of unsubstantiated info and it turned out to be false, would you really feel better about the whole thing?

anyway, i’m not sure how my preference to verify information before reporting contradicts my use of familiar nicknames for players. the former is a matter of journalism; the latter is a matter of style.

Michael Cunningham

February 21st, 2011
4:45 pm

@tckr83: “MC- If they’re not going to trade Jamal… what does the future hold for him and the Hawks? All I’ve ever heard is we can’t afford a new deal with him and letting him go for nothing would make it even worse…”

so much of it depends on how they finish and also the new CBA. if the Hawks make a real run in these playoffs, it would increase the chances they try to re-sign Jamal and keep building. a more favorable CBA would also make it more likely the Hawks re-sign him. if they flame out again, then probably Jamal leaves. also remember this is the final year of Rick Sund’s contract, too, so if he leaves another GM might have different ideas.

Michael Cunningham

February 21st, 2011
4:45 pm

@O’Brien:, “MC, If you get a chance to talk to Jamal, could you ask him about his slump? The last 4 games he is averaging 5 ppg, and is 0-10 from 3.”

asked him the other day and he didn’t have much to say. plan to double back on him and see if he’s in a more talkative mood.

hawks fan

February 21st, 2011
4:55 pm

I know there are ramon sessions trade rumors, but how likely is it for the hawks to acquire kirk hinrich with the expiring contract of jamal crawford? And also what about even looking to acquire camby, who would let horford play his natural pf spot? Or is Sund gonna do what he usually does and stay pat?

Choosen

February 21st, 2011
5:00 pm

When watching the hawks play its clear what they need and how they should play and this could be done with very little change.
1. You need a Pg that can defend and break down defenses for easy baskets (You would love Joe Johnson by this move alone)
2. On offense it simple play inside out. Josh wants to be notice as a true All-Star then he has such an advantage in post with the 15ft to 18ft jumper (3pt shooting is fools gold for him leave it alone)
2b. Inside out play still being your focus while Josh working the block keep big Al at the elbow he’s money with him slide down to block at times him self
3. 2 & 2b will open up the outside for easier shoots and more productive shooting
4. Use the big guys you have to bang the middle until the end of the game then you move al to middle for the finish
A Big body is always a plus but if we cant get one use what we have. The Pg position should be a must but everthing else we just got to man up and play with heart (Some body need call Charles Oakley or Zo Mourning who was only 6′10 260 but he had heart so you dont need a 7 footer to get you over the top)

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
5:26 pm

“remember this is the final year of Rick Sund’s contract, too,”

I really, really hope he asks for a huge raise… one the DASG won’t be able to afford.

Sund has no plan. It made no sense to draft Jordan Crawford and not extend Jamal unless Jamal was going to be traded for pieces at other positions. Now we hear that Jamal is not going to be traded either. As good as Jamal is at times, a team that wants to stay under the tax and is as unbalanced as the Hawks would be much better served paying that $10 million to two or three quality players at different positions rather than one player.

This guy seems like he makes decisions using a magic 8-ball. Even BK had a plan — it may have been an unorthodox plan that ultimately backfired, but it was still a plan. What was the point of firing BK anyway when all his successor has done is overpay to keep the core he assembled?

BK > Sund

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
5:31 pm

T-Mac and Flip Murray at the veterans’ minimum could have each given the Hawks 75% of what Jamal provides. A couple of intelligent moves like this could have allowed the Hawks to deal Jamal for help at center or an upgrade at small forward (or maybe both). Instead the Hawks are paying the vet minimum to Josh Powell and Etan Thomas who barely belong in this league. Sund is horrible.

For Real

February 21st, 2011
5:33 pm

Sund please make this trade:

Hawks:
Josh Smith
Mike Bibby
Jamal Crawford

Nuggets:
Nene
Billups
JR Smith

New lineup:
Billups
Joe
Williams
Horford
Nene

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
5:33 pm

I WILL POST THIS SAME MESSAGE EVERY DAY I CAN (THAT THE BLOGMONSTER LETS ME) UNTIL SOMETHING IS DONE:

MIKE BIBBY IS THE WORST STARTING PG IN THE NBA AND THERE ARE MANY 2ND PGS FAR BETTER THAN HIM. HOUSTON IS AS AVERAGE AS THEY WILL COME, AND BROOKS AND LOWRY ARE FARRRRR BETTER THAN BIBBY

HORFORD IS GETTING BEATEN UP AT THE 5

WE NEED A POINT GUARD AND A CENTER

SMOOVE FOR CURRY AND BIEDRINS

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
5:34 pm

I hope LD follows through on his threat and shakes up the starting lineup (specifically, I hope he starts Teague). I’m not counting on it — just like I’m not counting on the Hawks to make any intelligent moves at the trade deadline (like Jamal/Powell/Mo for Prince/TMac/Ben) — but I’m hoping against hope that it will happen.

cdog

February 21st, 2011
5:38 pm

anything rick sund is involved with is known as stupidity.don’t get your hopes up. all sund is going to do is keep a cell phone stuck in his ear and do absolutely nothing and still be known as a great gm by many even though the hawks get ousted in the first round of the playoffs. larry drew then will be blamed for the team’s failures. sund is a joke and a half for a GM

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
5:38 pm

Thank God it’s the final year of Rick Stunk’s contract. If we do make a run in the Playoffs he’d probably be retained. Are GM contracts ever revealed?

And to man man,

LOL @ you thinking Bibby would ever start over Derek Fisher (one of the clutchest shooters I’ve ever seen as well as a brilliant psychological player who knows how to take charges….and I am not his biggest fans), Beno Udrih (solid player who has put up 25 pt games this year), or even Luke Ridnour (another okay PG).

Bibby is pure garbage. Look at his game log. The guy definitely has less than ten 20 point games in the last 3 years

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
5:41 pm

LD will NEVER shake up the starting lineup unless it’s some useless move like starting Mo Evans (who sucks 90% of the time) or starting Collins.

I want to see Teague start for ONE game. Hell, start him tomorrow. We likely will not win in L.A. Kobe is on a high and they just lost to Cleveland. Let’s see what Teague can do. THE GUY CAN GET IN THE LANE AND CREATE SHOTS. ISN’T THAT WHAT WE NEED? Someone said on the blog yesterday that every shot Joe was taking looked so natural and easy because he had REAL PGs next to him.

I’m tired of seeing Joe in the corner guarded heavily. Same with Jamal. Teague >>>>>>> Bibby. I wish I could watch a practice

And again, LD is a scared little girl about changing the roster. He keeps making that threat after we get embarrassed at home, but nothing happens

Hawks Fan In New Orleans

February 21st, 2011
5:45 pm

“No excuses” is the theme of the players this 2nd half.
There is NO EXCUSE if Horford does not get 17 shot attempts per game this 2nd half.
There is NO EXCUSE Teague should not get 20 minutes per game.
There is NO EXCUSE that if Drew believes Teague does not have it, someone he believes can supplant Bibby is not acquired before the deadline.
There is NO EXCUSE to play JC1 at pg when its negatively effecting his game and the homogeneity of the team – development of our future pg.
There is NO EXCUSE for J Smoove to stay camped out on the 3 point line all game long – Dominique was a small forward and drove to the rack (spin move) or played in the post more
Josh Smith ≠ RAY ALLEN
There is NO! I repeat NO EXCUSE!!! For The Hawks to get blown out at home to anyone again this year!

Hawks

February 21st, 2011
5:46 pm

Trade Hawks should pursue:

Hawks Get:
Billups
Nene
JR Smith
Stuckey
Tmac
Maxiell

Pistons Get:
Teague
Mo
Thomas
Powell

Nuggets Get:
Johs
Crawford
Bibby

jason

February 21st, 2011
5:46 pm

Smoove for Cuuryy and beidrins. Give them a Second rounder

JeJe

February 21st, 2011
5:47 pm

What’s with all this talk about how Teague’s defense sucks? ok, it’s not great but people in every state in this country who know nothing about our team still know Bibby’s defense sucks b@775

Teague has made jumpers too, even if his jumpshot is ugly

Sautee

February 21st, 2011
5:48 pm

Najeh,

Wouldn’t you think that what the ASKG REALLY is doing with Jamal is holding on to that expiring contract for headroom next year (with Al’s raise kicking in)?

I don’t think them not trading Jamal is necessarily an endorsement of his play.

Hawks

February 21st, 2011
5:58 pm

New Starting Lineup:

PG: Billups
SG: Joe
SF: JR Smith
PF: Horford
C: NeNe

Bench:
PG: Stuckey
SG: Tmac
SF: Marvin
PF: Maxiel
C: Collins/Zsa-Zsa

Closing Games Out:

PG: Billups
SG: Joe
SF: Tmac
PF: Horford
C: NeNe

ag

February 21st, 2011
6:19 pm

START JEFF TEAGUE

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
6:38 pm

Sautee,

Co-sign. By not trading Jamal, that is $10.8 mil that will be off the books for next season. I think that is one of the main reasons why RIck Sund did something he doesnt usually do, and thats give extensions during the season, which he did with Horford.

By giving Al a raise from $5.4 mil to $12 mil next season, Jamal’s $10.8 mil will come in handy to help save them money.

And although this is Rick’s last year, lets remember that as bad as BK was (especially with his draft picks), the ASG still offered him one more year. I wont be surprised when they offer Rick a 1 year extension, especially sicne LD will also have 1 year left on his deal.

Big Ray

February 21st, 2011
6:43 pm

I’ve long since come to the conclusion that Sund is a part-time GM. I believe Michael Gearon has his own feelings about certain players (that is, when he’s not having feelings about who to sue next) and that if he wants to keep them, then Sund is not going to offer even the smallest hint of a protest.

Sund is a GM when he is pushed or allowed to be one. Otherwise, he’s a paid consultant. In other words, he’s fine being “slow and methodical” when he isn’t being pushed, and fine doing whatever little bit of actual stuff Gearon actually wants him to do.

Just think about it. Did the Hawks puruse the Jamal trade, or did it fall in their laps? Look at the free agent acquisitions we’ve made. All have been near the end of the free agency period, and minimum contract types. There’s a common denominator: NOTHING HAS BEEN OUTWARDLY PROACTIVE.

Deciding on the coaching situation? Let Woody walk, promote Larry. Proactive? Not. It was a force situation, something HAD to be done.

Sign a SG/SF to backup the position that was one of the shallowest. Didn’t happen until JJ went down, and Marvin and Jamal had already incurred injuries. See? Force is what it takes to get things going.

All the rest of the free agency stuff was easy. Offer your own guys more money than anybody else is likely to, and you voila…your roster is filled.

Sad, twisted fact: We win enough to justify the lack of proactive measures.

ag

February 21st, 2011
6:47 pm

STOP SUBMITTING DUMB TRADES!!!! The Hawks are shopping Marvin and don’t expect much. You go shopping at Kroger with $2, are you expecting to get a steak? No, you will get a pack of noodles and that is what the Hawks will get. So trading Marvin for i.e. Thabeet may work for both teams since both teams are dissatsified with both. I do understand that the salaries don’t work.

Big Ray

February 21st, 2011
6:48 pm

If you want to make a change at point guard, for the sake of not going with the same old issues, then you either start Jeff Teague, or acquire a pg that will:

1) Take Bibby’s place, or a lot of his minutes.

2) Force Jamal back to the SG position, where he truly belongs.

Make all the fuss you want about Ramon Sessions, especially those who keep insisting that Teague is the answer to our pg woes. There’s this thing called evidence. Sessions, regardless of whether he was playing for a losing or winning team, has proven what he can do at the position in this League. Teague has no such proof. For those insisting that such proof is only lacking because of Woody, and now Larry, I agree that his potential is not know because of either guy. But if he truly was an answer to the problem, surely two NBA coaches are not so blind that they can’t see his proof in practice and in games.

Nope, sorry. It’s not just the coaches. I supported Teague for a while as far as his potential. But what I wanted is not what many want. I wanted him to get 18 mpg, and that’s ALL I ever wanted, as I figured he could show what he was worth in that amount of PT. So many want him to start, and I think more than half are saying this only because they are tired of Bibby.

Big Ray

February 21st, 2011
6:49 pm

Marvin for Thabeet? Why on earth would we want a worthless big man who can block shots only if somebody points them out to him?

Sautee

February 21st, 2011
6:51 pm

Big Ray,

Nothing Outwardly Proactive.

Perfect Summation.

Big Co-Sign.

Sautee

February 21st, 2011
6:56 pm

“Sad, twisted fact: We win enough to justify the lack of proactive measures.”

Which is exactly why I’ve said that unless we go though a protracted awful spell, then Gearon won’t touch the Sacred Core.

Sad, but too true.

drmaryb (*_*)

February 21st, 2011
6:56 pm

Man yall need to stop re-posting the same ISH from the previous blogs.

ATL FAN

February 21st, 2011
6:57 pm

Loosest as in not caring for what the coach has to say, or loosest as in having fun and messing around? Theres a huge difference there

Ken

February 21st, 2011
7:08 pm

hawks need to trade sharif abdur rahim back to the lakers for pau gasol and leave bibby in san francisco and leave with some curry…

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
7:13 pm

ken must know of a time machine to make those deals happen.

I guess we could ask for the Bill Russell trade back if you want?
Wanna reconsider the Pistol deal to the Jazz?

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
7:14 pm

There’s a reason why Big Ray has his own blog on the ajc. His 6:43 pm post is damn near perfect. Nothing proactive, always reactive.

Even the move that all of us THOUGHT was a proactive move ( trading our 1st round pick to get 2 picks a little later ), turned out to be nothing but a moneymaker for the ASG, because they sold the 31st pick.

When Sund and the ASG do something really proactive, I’ll believe it when I see it. Those 3 big men we signed in the summer would ALL be out of the NBA right now, had we’d not signed them.

ag

February 21st, 2011
7:19 pm

In Teague’s only game in LA, he scored 12 pts on 5-7 shooting in 17 minutes. He also had 3 ast and 2 steals and was a +8 dispite the Hawks lost 118-110. For his good effort, Woody benched him with a fat DNP the next game.

More info on Bibby, 40th in assists, 60th in steals and 50th in points (these stats are amoung all guards. I really and truly hope that LD makes a change to Teague, because we can’t do much worst.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
7:20 pm

MC;
You should not be so hypersensitive.
I thought my points were clear.
(a) You use casual rather than formal register on the blog.
By your own admission [which is fine and dandy].
You say the blog is informal and we are your “blog people”.
(b) You claim journalistic integrity when the topic becomes;
“trade rumors”.
Then you suggest my attitude about your journalistic style
is due to my wish for a trade.
I would say that:
“I wish for the Hawks to develop a winning culture”.
Now if that be trades or whatnot & you report it then glory be!

Michael, the blog is a pastime for myself and others.
I’m ambivalent towards you as a journalist / blogger.
Which I reckon you could neither care more nor less?

If you throw out some news you hear…what’s the harm?
State it as such, hearsay.
Or could it be that you just don’t care to dig.
After all it’s only a blog.

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
7:26 pm

“JeJe

February 21st, 2011
5:38 pm
Thank God it’s the final year of Rick Stunk’s contract. If we do make a run in the Playoffs he’d probably be retained. Are GM contracts ever revealed?”

Jeje, I think it would be safe to assume that Rick Sund makes more than the coach for which he is responsible for hiring, Larry. Don’t inquire beyone that….how he has been able to reinvent himself as a proactive and forward thinking GM is beyond my comprehension. Don’t even start talking about the scouting department. I am still waiting for that hidden gem that all teams uncover except for us. Memo to Sund: you are not in San Antonio, and you aren’t bringing in surprise talents like Gary Neal and DeJuan Blair, 2 solid bench players.
JC2 and Teague are collecting splinters on the bench waiting for an opportunity. Simply put, you hire a guy who has zero interest in developing any bench depth. Larry is ok with the current top 3 of Collins, Zaza and JC1.
I gotta wonder where this bench ranks in stats across the NBA. Do we come in and set a tone that differs from the starting 5? Do we ever outplay the other bench?

I gotta think even if Bibster gets moved to the bench, he hurts us in smaller increments. Bibster simply put, isn’t going to sit on the bench for long segments of time. We have no one to put in there because we won’t attempt to grow a PG. So for all of us asking for a replacement for Bibster, who says Larry will even give him a chance?

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
7:27 pm

* ? Now it’s up to anyone who cares
to figure out where it should have been placed?

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
7:28 pm

And MC . . thank you for not being a TMZ style beat writer, who reports every rumor he hears, and tries to pass it off as “possibly true”. I’m convinved that 50% of these “unnamed sources” for these trades, actually come from fans posting various ish on message boards and blogs.

You reporting any and every rumor that you hear, would be like you going to a school and telling a bunch of 1st graders that Santa Claus is real.

It may be what the kids want to hear, but you know it ain’t the damn truth, so you refuse to lie to the kids like that.

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
7:30 pm

northcyde, i’ve been saying that about our big men the day they were signed. Collins & Thomas, neither will ever wear another team’s uniform. They won’t make another roster.
You might be able to include Mo in that conversation as well. I had high hopes for him out of Orlando, and he never showed anything more than just being filler for 5 guys on the court who hit a few 3’s while employed by the ASG. He has fallen out of the rotation and fallen hard.
Fact is, all 3 are an offseason away from needing to update their resumes and stand in line with so many other fallen NBA pine riders.

ag

February 21st, 2011
7:32 pm

Big Ray, all I read is these trades, i.e. Carmillo for ZaZa, Etan, Collins and Marvin. These trades will not happen. I also hear most people want a center. The Hawks are a very athletic team, but a guy like Shaq would slow us down (well, Bibby is too). Are you telling me Collins is BETTER than Thabeet? Or is Collins upside greater than Thabeet’s? Okay, Thabeet is averaging 1.1 ppg 1.6 rpg and .03 blocks. but Twin is averaging 2.1 ppg 2.1 rpg, and .2 blk. Again, what is Thabeet’s potential? At this stage of his career, it has to be greater than Twin.

ATL FAN

February 21st, 2011
7:41 pm

Agree, I get pissed every time I hear some trade rumor that has NO merit here. It simply gets my hopes up, only to dissapoint

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
7:41 pm

“Wouldn’t you think that what the ASKG REALLY is doing with Jamal is holding on to that expiring contract for headroom next year (with Al’s raise kicking in)?”

Sure, but this doesn’t preclude a trade. It’s not like the Hawks can’t trade Jamal for other players whose contracts are expiring. In the trade I keep mentioning over and over again, Prince and T-Mac are both expiring while Ben Wallace is owed a whopping $2 million next year. If the Hawks can’t afford to pay the luxury tax on Big Ben’s $2 million next year, so what? Chicago traded Kirk Hinrich and their first rounder during last year’s draft to Washington for a second rounder just to clear cap space. Who is to say the Hawks couldn’t do the same with Zaza or Bibby during this year’s draft to clear that salary off the books and bring the Hawks back beneath the luxury tax threshold? It’s not like the Hawks make use of their first round picks anyway.

Or, if they can’t take on the $2 million at all, they could just trade Jamal for Prince and T-Mac, and then trade Prince for, say, Caron Butler (yes I know he’s injured) and JJ Barea (both expiring), or Aaron Brooks (qualifying offer next year which the Hawks could choose not to exercise) and Shane Battier (expiring). The point is, there are several ways the Hawks can cash in Jamal’s expiring contract to increase the overall depth of the team, and someone like T-Mac could provide a huge chunk of Jamal’s production while allowing the Hawks to allocate the rest of that $10 million this year to address multiple needs. All it takes is a little creativity.

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
7:44 pm

And the thing is, it’s likely Jamal will command at least $7-$8 million per year over three or four years on his next deal even with a new CBA. He’s going to be one of the better unrestricted free agents on the market. The chances of the Hawks re-signing him are pretty slim. If they swap him for several good expiring pieces, though, they can wait for the new CBA and pick and choose which ones they can afford to keep.

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
7:48 pm

@ KevinM

According to hoopsstats.com, the Hawks bench ranks #26 in the league in efficiency. The starters rank #9.

That #26 for the bench is the 3rd lowest in the league, and the absolute lowest in the Eastern Conference. Amongst the playoff teams, only Memphis and Portland have worse benches.

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
7:48 pm

“So many want him to start, and I think more than half are saying this only because they are tired of Bibby.”

I want him to start so that we can decide once and for all whether or not he’s good. Maybe he plays well with the starters and keeps the starting job. Maybe he sucks and proves once and for all that he “can’t ball” in the words of northcyde. I’d just like to know once and for all so we can quit arguing about him and the Hawks can move on accordingly. I think it’s fair to say that when he’s driving and kicking to Damien Wilkins or drawing the defense and dishing to Zaza down low, the result is going to be a little different than if he drives and kicks to Joe or draws the defense and dishes to Al down low. Let’s see once and for all whether he can make a big enough impact with the starters to be considered a part of this team’s future.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
7:49 pm

I am about to get “shouted” off this blog.

I know this, and realize it in advance.

But, here it goes:

Sund has been a near perfect GM for ASG. ASG has not wanted him to cross the Luxury Tax line. Sund hasn’t. Sund and Pendegraft have drafted perfectly for this team with 2 athletic G’s to take Bibby and Jamal’s place.

Sund made ASG 3mil. for selling a 1st pick, and still got a guy he wanted in JC2. Sund didn’t want LD, some of the ownership group did. So LD’s lack of developing Teague and JC2 go on the Spirit Group, not Sund.

Sund has spaced our salaries out masterfully years into the future with the cap. Sund was not bidding against himself for Marvin, ZaZa, and Bibby as some of indicated on this blog, but those guys were valuable at the time (believe it or not). If Sund had not have signed Bibby, who else was out there but an older Andre Miller, who wanted more money. He pleased his Coach in Woody by re-signing Bibby, which was one of the qualifications for assessing Woody as a Coach.

Rick Sund was a loser in Seattle. He made terrible draft picks. But all the way around, he has done the best he could with ASG’s restrictions and wishes, and I will be shocked if Sund is not retained for 2+ years if he wants to be retained.

ATL is set up better than any team in the East after 2 years. Thank Rick Sund and his capology for that.

Anyway, alot more to say, but let the tomato throwing begin!

P.S. I’m not related to Rick Sund in anyway. I don’t even know him, but I just call them like I see them.

ATL FAN

February 21st, 2011
7:58 pm

SteveW= Rick Sund

LOL @ “Sund has spaced our salaries out masterfully years into the future with the cap.” Sure, we have a solid cap with the Starting 5 alone… BUT WE HAVE NO BENCH

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:04 pm

Steve W,

How can you say Marvin was valuable when he got his contract, despite the fact that he missed 21 games that year (~26% of the season). And he also missed 18 games (22% of the season) 2 seasons prior.

Have you checked to see what the Hawks record (and win %) was in those games that Marvin missed? I think you might be surprised.

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
8:07 pm

@ ag . . . I don’t know what Big Ray’s response will be. But as a person who sees as many Grizzlies games on TV as Hawks games, I can safely say that Thabeet is GARBAGE.

Stop using the word “potential”. Guys who have potential in the NBA usually show it beyond a shadow of a doubt by Year 2.

Thabeet is an unmotivated player who probably won’t become even an average center. Solo was a much better player in Year 2 than Thabeet on both offense and defense.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:07 pm

Steve W,

Steve W,

Also, Andre Miller got 3 years, $22 mil. While Bibby got 3 years $18 mil. However, Andre Miller’s 3rd year is a team option. So basically, Andre Miller got a 2 year $16 mil contract. Sure, it was higher than Bibby’s, but Hawks should have given Bibby a smiliar deal. They would still have been under the luxury tax, and Bibby would have been expiring this season, giving them more flexibility.

Don’t you think Bibby’s 3rd year should have been a team option, instead of being guaranteed?

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:09 pm

Steve W,

I was wrong. Andre Miller’s deal was 3 years $21 mil. but only the first 2 years, $14 mil was guaranteed.

In Bibby’s first 2 years of his deal, he made $12 mil. But next year, we are paying Bibby $6 mil, while Portland does not have to pay Andre Miller a dime (if they chose).

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:11 pm

Sund listened to his Coach, LD, and got Pape Sy over here to replace Mo’ for next season. This prevented the Hawks from signing Da’Sean Butler when the Heat released him. But that’s on LD.

Sund could have made a play for TMac. But that would have messed up his roster numbers, again because of Sy.

Sund could have made more of a play for Shaq, and that’s probably his biggest mistake.

Not going hard after Dampier was probably his 2nd biggest mistake. But at the time, everybody thought that Al was C for 82 games, and going big had not yet been tried. And signing those 2 would have messed with rotations.

LD wanted Powell for his outside shot, his practice presence, his locker room stuff, and to teach the Hawks how to get 2 rings.

Etan was about as good as you could get outside of Shaq and Dampier.

But rotations are LD’s deal, not Sund. Sund didn’t make LD play Mo’ with a hurt knee. Sund doesn’t make LD continue to play Mo’ over Wilkens. Sund doesn’t make LD play Bibby major minutes to the exclusion of Teague. Sund doesn’t make LD play Jamal at point to the point of hurting his game.

That’s on LD. Playing Horford 40+ several times and then him getting hurt is LD.

Letting Josh disobey his Coach, that’s not Sund, that’s LD. Josh not in the low block? LD, not Sund.

Sund’s done a good job in many ways, especially with the cap. We like to talk about bad contracts, but the Hawks don’t have bad contracts. Check out other teams, then you see bad contracts. I’ve given, as have others, example after example of bad contracts.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:13 pm

northcyde,

I dont understand what the fascination with Thabeet is either. They sent him to the D-League, and he couldnt even dominate down there. Just because he was a good shot blocker in college does not mean he will be any good in the pros.

Just look at Shelden Williams. Dude was known as “The Landlord” in college (he was a beast, and he owned the paint), and he was ACC defensive POY. But yet, he is about to be traded to his 7th team in 5 years.

Some fans are still talking about Marvin’s potential, and he has been in the league 6 years…SMH

ag

February 21st, 2011
8:13 pm

NorthClyde, is he really that bad? Never see him play, but we need a running center who can block shots….like a Tyson Chandler or Jakeem Noah. We cannot get these guys (although we could have had Chandler), so we have to get a second tier guy.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:18 pm

SteveW,

Not going hard after Dampier was probably his 2nd biggest mistake. But at the time, everybody thought that Al was C for 82 games, and going big had not yet been tried..

Actually, LD is on record as saying he always thought Al was a PF, so if Sund is listening to LD, I think LD would have wanted Dampier to give Al a break. Isnt that the reason why they signed Collins?

I think you are contradicting your comments…

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:20 pm

O’Brien – At the time, I didn’t even want us to sign Bibby. I was rooting for others, even young guns. It was obvious Bibby was slowing down. But Woody wanted him. And my understanding is we had to have the 3rd year guranteed because Bibby was going to sign somewhere else (Philly?) for the bucks if we didn’t gurantee it.

Marvin was a 22 year 2nd pick who had shown potential. We low balled him. He thought about it for a couple of weeks then accepted. I know we played well without Marvin in the lineup. That was when Mo’ could actually play. I really liked Mo’ then.

And who knew ZaZa was going to be Jon Contract? Wow he’s gotten worse. All i can say about ZaZa is that he plays hard. That’s about it.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
8:20 pm

northcyde

On the one hand;
you have Fox News = zero journalistic integrity.
Yet FN causes a great deal of harm.
On the other hand;
“NBA trade rumors” may or may not = journalistic integrity.
But they don’t hurt nobody !

northcyde,
you tickle me sometimes.
But you don’t hurt nobody !

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:24 pm

O’Brien – No. When the season started, LD had Al at Center, and still plays him there most of the time. The Dampier thing was we had Al and ZaZa at C. Gearon had wanted Collins back, so he got into shape over the summer, after the AJC had run an article on him at the end of last season saying what great shape he was in, but that’s beside the point. Anyway, and we had Etan and Powell. It would have caused some dissension if we would have brought Damp in just because of playing time. LD had never played Al big at that point. But he had signed off on signing Shaq.

ag

February 21st, 2011
8:25 pm

ZaZa plays hard? Okay but he is terrible, even worse than Joncontract! I doubt he would be on any NBA roster either.

ATL FAN

February 21st, 2011
8:27 pm

Thabeet starting playing basketball when he was 15… he has no idea how to play

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:29 pm

Steve W,

The ZaZa contract does not bother me that much.

But as for Bibby, you think Philly (who would not give Andre Miller a 3rd year guarantee, despite being one of the healthiest PGs the last 10 years), that they were going to give Bibby a 3rd year?

Doubtful.

As for Al at Center, of course he still plays him there most of the time. Who else is LD going to play there? ZaZa and Collins for 48 minutes combined?

ATL FAN

February 21st, 2011
8:31 pm

can you guys stop comparing the Bibby deal to the Miller deal? Miller was a much better player than Bibby ever was, still is, and his deal was WAY more valuable than the Hawks deal with Bibby

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
8:32 pm

And we low balled Marvin?

Do you know how many teams had the salary cap space to offer Marvin a 5 year $37.5 mil deal? And of those teams with the salary space, do you know how many of them were in need of a SF?

I dont, but a good GM knows the answer to those questions. And uses the information to his advantage. Marvin was injured 2 out of the last 3 seasons, what was he going to do? Hold out for more money?

Especially when a 6′5″ SG played well enough so that we didnt collapse when Marvin was out?

Worldwide Clyde

February 21st, 2011
8:34 pm

Let’s play a game of how much the blowout will be on tuesday night. I say we get blown out by 25.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
8:34 pm

If it came about that we ended up with:
Ramon Sessions + Ryan Gomes
and,
we lost Marv – JC2 -&- or – Teaguer – [Mo],
the Hawks would be a better team.

Bibby would be a designated gunner off the bench
-or-
start and give way to Sessions who would play more min.
When Jamal came in to play the [2] Joe would be free to play the [3].
Gomes, Josh & Joe could handle the min @ the [3] pos.

Basically we would be getting two quality NBA players for *one = [Marv]
*JC2 & Teaguer are not quality NBA ready…..yet.

Any way you slice it / it improves our depth this year.

Another point Sessions is a slasher who gets to the line.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:38 pm

O’Brien – This is what I remember about the Bibby to Sixers thing. Remember also, Bibby is a couple of years younger than Miller, and would have been per year cheaper:

Mike Bibby reaches out to 76ers
Posted by Inside Hoops

Read more: http://www.insidehoops.com/blog/?p=4507#ixzz1EeCxwBWW

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:42 pm

O’Brien – The blogmonster keeps eating another post from July 1st 2009 saying Bibby was most likely going to get 10m per year. Can you believe it?

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:44 pm

Mike Bibby: most likely goner among Hawks free agents

* July 1st, 2009 11:19 pm ET

Atlanta Hawks Mike Bibby made the third highest salary — a few five-star meals shy of $15 million — among NBA point guards last season. He is nowhere close to the third best point guard.

Some team out there will offer Bibby a contract within range of $10 mil, maybe more. That’s how free agency works, especially in a shallow pool like this year’s.

That team likely won’t be the Hawks. They acquired Jamal Crawford by trade and Jeff Teague by draft. Both play the point, if not full-time.

So, let’s assume Bibby’s outa here. Who among the other significant Hawks free agents might be retained?

Forward Marvin Williams, probably, because he is a restricted free agent and the Hawks are inclined to grant him one more year before locking him in or cutting him loose. Too much upside to take a chance on getting burned.

Guard Flip Murray, probably, because he comes cheaply and is a prototype off-the-bench guy who starts occasionally without downgrading the lineup.

Big man Zaza Pachulia, maybe. Depends on if Z gets a whopping offer. The Hawks would welcome back the enforcer who backs down from nobody but won’t reach into a higher salary bracket.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:44 pm

O’Brien – The above post was from the Examiner, July 1st 2009

88hawksfan

February 21st, 2011
8:45 pm

I am glad, I am not the only one who sees what a waste of minutes Za Za is for the Hawks. The man has no hands, no drive, no strength to the basket, no lift off the ground, limited defense. I am glad he has helped us in the pre-Horford era, but he was nefver that good and is definitely not that good now. the Hawks organization has the have the courage to say goodbye to Za Za Pachulia. Marvin for a 1st round, 3rd pick is not that great and he does have the butt of a duck, but when he’s on, he contributes – ok, it’s a problem sometimes, but so are all the other Hawks. When the team is winning against an easy opponent , Joe Johnson makes everything, but when the game is tough, he misses a lot. I am not too harsh on Joe because he’s double-teamed, tripple-teamed all night (Joe get rid of the ball earlier when double, tripple-teamed!). Josh has those nights when nothings falls in, but he does more for this team than everyone except Al Horford. Joe may need another operation as an excuse of how lousy he shoots. He mades 3 3-pointers in the old star game, but missed the first one. That’s the one I remember the most. Bibby is not that bad and if we had a elite PG, and a center to share PT with Collins and let Al play 4 and Josh 3, we would be awesome! I would say, Bibby, Marvin, Collins, JC1 and or JC2 off the bench the send Mo, Za Za, Etan, and even J. Powell packing. J Powell is a good cheerleader and makes his 12 footers; he has a little D, but he’s that that good, Etan is even less of a good player. What is Sund going to do? Mo just not someone you can count on to make shots; is Mo’s defense that good? Wilkins wants a home in ATL, but can he really help? He’s nothing like Dominic or Gerald.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:47 pm

O’Brien – Remember posts like this concerning Marvin?

The most intriguing free agent: Marvin Williams

Postby HeroicKennedy on Wed May 13, 2009 2:56 am
Not necessarily the best or even the one to be had for the cheapest, but the kid really intrigues me. He’s bigger than Prince (230 vs. 215), he’s got good length and athleticism and seems to have started turning the corner as a player. His TS jumped from 51% to 54% to 57%, and his PER has jumped from 12.2 in 2006-2007 to 16.0 in 2008-2009. The guy seems to being making progress each and every season. I know a lot of people want to move Rip and bring in Gordon, but Gordon has actually regressed in the same period (TS stayed at 57%, PER dropped from 18.2 to 17.0). Something tells me that Marvin is on the verge of really busting out, but I think he won’t be able to do that in Atlanta thanks to guys like Smith and Johnson.

Not that I’m advocating simply removing Prince to bring in Williams, but I really think that Prince is the more valuable trading asset and would net us more than Hamilton, and that I’d rather have a 6′9 230 pound SF who’s showing good progress and has a lot of potential over the 6′2 SG who’s kind of maxed out and wants a lot more money. I don’t know how far Atlanta is willing to go to match, but I do think that Williams has a lot of talent and his size/strength potential could make him the second best SF in the East within the next 2-3 years.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:51 pm

O’Brien – And this from Yardbarker concerning Marvin June 29th, 2009:

4. Marvin Williams, F (23)
PER: 16.04
Williams is just 23, and averaged around 14/6 the last two seasons. He really improved his three point shot last year, nailing about 35% of his attempts (after shooting a woeful 10% the year before). His PER took a nice jump from 14.74 to 16.04, so he’s definitely developing, but what’s his upside? He’s a pretty good defender and he’s really young. In fact, he’s the complete package, but isn’t necessarily destined to be a star. He’s slated to make $7.3 million this season, and should probably sign an extension in that ballpark. The Kings, Raptors, T-Wolves and Blazers could use some help at small forward, so there may be a market if he and the Hawks can’t come to terms.
Value: $7.0 – $8.0 million per year

And there’s so many more articles out there on these subjects. I followed that Free Agency daily, and remember all this stuff, even if some don’t.

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
8:52 pm

@ ag . . the following is from thememphisedge.com

************

Questions and answers with Grizzlies beat reporter Ronald Tillery

By Gary Robinson on February 16, 2011 12:37 PM

Share:

If you have questions you’d like asked of Ron Tillery, e-mail them to me at robinson@commercialappeal.com

** A question from reader Keith: Considering how well the Grizzlies have played over the last few games without O.J. Mayo, do you think they will try to make a trade for him at the trade deadline? Consider the trade packages below:

Memphis Grizzlies trade: O.J. Mayo & Hasheem ThaBUST for either:

1. Portland Trailblazers: Greg Oden & Elliot Williams

2. Cleveland Cavaliers: Antawn Jamison & Anderson Varejao

3. NY Knicks: Wilson Chandler & Danilo Gallinari

4. Philadelphia 76ers: Andre Iguodala & Marreese Speights

5. Milwaukee Bucks: Chris Douglas-Roberts, Luc Richard Mbah a Moute, 2nd rd pick

While I personally believe that Mayo probably would benefit from a change of scenery given his troubles on and off the court in Memphis, I haven’t heard anything concrete that says owner Mike Heisley is looking to trade Mayo. Remember, Heisley called Mayo a “mini Kobe,” referring to Lakers guard Kobe Bryant. I don’t disagree with the notion that it’ll probably take Mayo to sweeten any deal Involving Thabeet. Right now, though, the Griz are more interested in moving Thabeet than Mayo in any package.

*********************

So if a team really wanted Thabeet, they probably could get him. But Thabeet ( or as the fan called him, ThaBUST ) is a garbage center.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:53 pm

But if you wanna shake up this team, I say:

Trade JC2 and a 2nd pick for Sessions if Cleveland will do it.

Trade Teague for Jason Thompson if the Kings still want that trade.

And see what happens.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
8:55 pm

Northcyde – Co-sign – Thabeet is a terrible center. I have no idea how long it would take to develop him, if ever (probably never).

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
8:59 pm

Thabeet is owed a whopping 5.1 million next season, with a team option in 2012 – 13.

So unless they’d take a player like Zaza off our hands ( who is still owed 10 million for the next 2 years ), I don’t know if Memphis would do that deal or not. I would seriously doubt it, seeing that they’re just as cash strapped ( if not more ) than we are.

doc

February 21st, 2011
9:12 pm

stevew who? after that blog on sund being competent. :-)

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
9:16 pm

Steve W,

Some team out there will offer Bibby a contract within range of $10 mil, maybe more..

They did not say a contract of $10 mil per year, so we should not jump to conclusions. Remember, we offered him a contract of $18 mil, so (imo), the $10 mil would have been a 2 year deal.

And I am not saying we should not have signed marvin. All I am saying is a good GM would have let the market set his price (or at least make his 5th year a team option).

Let me ask you this. Who was more valuable at the time? marvin? or josh Smith? If your answer is Josh Smith, then my next question then is why did Rick let Josh Smith test the market? Remember, Philly could have offered Josh 5 years, $80 mil. Lucky for us, they gave it to Elton Brand.

But memphis offered josh 5 years, $60 mil, which was a friendly deal. So we matched that same day. Do you think Rick should have used that approach with Marvin, especially since he is coming off an injury (marvin was injured during the playoffs too, so he didnt play well then either).

Melvin

February 21st, 2011
9:22 pm

Man, I wish the Hawks could acquire Harris, Felton or Hinrich. Seems like all three are available….

Hoops

February 21st, 2011
9:27 pm

Trading Evans and Teague for Sessions is a no brainer for the Cavs and the Hawks. What is the hild up? How hard can it be Rick Sund?

Hoops

February 21st, 2011
9:34 pm

The next trade the Hawks should try to get is Nene for Josh Smith straight up. Then you have this line up:

PG-Sessions/Bibby
SG-JJ/Crawford1/Crawford2
SF-Williams/Wilkins
PF-Horford/Powell
C-Nene/Zaza/Twin

That’s much better than what we have now!

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
9:40 pm

O’Brien – Agreed about Bibby, but again, I followed that voraciously on a daily basis, and we really thought he was gone.

Remember also, so marginal players got some really fat contracts – G Ben Gordon – 5 years, 55 mill.; Jarret Jack 4 year deal 20 mill. Hedo got a 5 year 53 mill deal. Charlie Villenueva a 5 year deal worth 35mill etc.

I’m sure Marvin could have tested the market, but what if he would have gotten a 5 year 45 mill offer? Would Sund have been stupid for matching?

And the Smith deal, if you remember was right after Sund got here. There was no harm in seeing what a psychotic, rebellious talent who was fighting with his Coach would get on the open market, especially when you can match it.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
9:46 pm

O’Brien – And this whole Gm stuff is such a dicey thing anyway. What if Marv signed for the 5 year deal he got, and then developed into an 18 and 10 guy? Now Sund’s looking like a genius.

Look at the Suns with Childress. He’s made them look stupid, and Sund pretty smart. And Thabeet and Mayo have made the Grizzlies front office look like idiots.

And Shelden, Acie, and Salim, as well as Marvin made BK out of a job.

What if JJ would have blown out a knee last season, he would have looked stupid rejecting Sund’s 4 year 60m offer. But he hit it big.

Brand blows out a knee. Redd the same. Kirelenko becomes oft injured. Now their front offices take a hit. So much is a dicey proposition.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
9:49 pm

Man, all this talk about Sessions is going to make me really disappointed if we don’t get him!

I think the guy can play, but I don’t know if LD can Coach him or give him proper minutes.

Big Ray. I do think LD and Woody can be wrong about Teague. Because they both come from the Larry Brown Coaching tree, which hates marginal, developing rookies and young players, and especially PG’s. Just my two cents.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
9:54 pm

Steve W,

In the summer of ‘09…

25 year old Jarrett jack was available, and he signed for 4 years $20 mil deal. He averaged 13 points and 5 assists his contract year.

22 year old Ramon Sessions was available, and he signed for 4 years, $16 mil. he averaged 12 points and 6 assists his contract year.

31 year old Mike Bibby was available, and we offered him 3 years, $18 mil. he averaged 15 points and 5 assists.

32 year old Andre Miller was available, and he got 3 years, $21 mil (only 2 years and $14 mil guaranteed). he averaged 16 pts and 7 assists.

The fact that other PGs were available was an opportunity for Sund to get Bibby to accept a 2 year deal, or a lower annual salary. As a GM, you have to look at the market (supply and demand). And there were other options at PG.

I know Woody wanted Bibby back, but a good GM must also do what he thinks is right. Next year, LD will probably want jamal back. Does that mean Rick should potentially overpay to bring him back?

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
9:54 pm

I’m at the point now, I want to trade Bibby for something, almost anything, get Sessions, and keep a young BC in Sessions and Teague.

Sautee

February 21st, 2011
9:56 pm

SteveW,

about this: “LD wanted Powell for his outside shot, his practice presence, his locker room stuff, and to teach the Hawks how to get 2 rings.”

Never saw ANYTHING about this before we acquired Powell. I only saw that LD said something like that AFTER Powell was signed, that he was glad to have him for those reasons.

You make it sound like going after Powell was LDs idea.

Got a source?

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
9:58 pm

O’Brien – Bibby’s percieved value was very high because of his experience. I know what your saying. But I also know Mr. Tightwad, Rick Sund. And he would not have paid Bibby .1 cent over what he had to in order to keep him.

Now the Jamal situation is different, because of Luxury tax and a new CBA. No way to keep Jamal because of ASG, unless as MC says, ATL makes an unexpected, deep run in the playoffs.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
9:59 pm

Steve W,

A good GM must also look at the makup of his team. With JJ doing what he does, Josh improving, Al improving, and Bibby doing what he does, how likely was it that Marvin was going to get enough shots to average 18 pts?

And lets say Marvin was to average 18 and 10, what if he was missing 25% of the season every other year (which is what he did for 2 of the last 3 seasons before signing his deal)? Would it be worth it?

And did Rick not realize that the CBA would expire in 2 years, which would probably lower salaries, salary cap space etc?

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:00 pm

This is what Bibby’s agent said after agreeing with ATL, “A number of teams had interest in him … but I think Mike was comfortable in the environment” with the Hawks, Falk said.”

cp

February 21st, 2011
10:03 pm

LD will not change the starting lineup. We will see the same guys we always see out there….I forgot who suggested it on here but I would be fine with giving Teague about 5 starts to see if he plays better with the starters. As bad as Bibby has been on the defensive end I dont see how it could hurt. Its time to try something new because I doubt Gearon lets Sund make any significant move. The price tag for Sessions is probably growing by the day.

JoJo the Godfather

February 21st, 2011
10:05 pm

I have four issues with Sessions: 1) He turns the ball over almost as often as Teague does, 2) He can’t hit the 3 at all, 3) He makes nearly 3 times the money that Teague does, and 4) He’s a known poor defender.

I’ll take him for Mo and a second round pick, but not Teague or JC2.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
10:08 pm

From the Denver Post;

The Carmelo Anthony trade saga is nearly over.

Indications are that a trade is imminent with the New York Knicks, with only minor details to be worked out before an agreement is reached, a league source said..

I am ready for melo to be traded, so other deals can take place.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:12 pm

This from the LA Times July 21st, 2010: This is about Josh Powell signing with the Hawks, which occurred a few days later.

Hawks first-year Coach Larry Drew said, “that’s about a done deal.”

Drew said Powell can provide the Hawks with a lift off the bench at power forward.

Now you would assume that LD had some input into what FA’s he wanted, and what would best fit with his offense. This shows he was talking about it before the signing. And yes, you are correct, that I read the other things after the signing, but one assume that he didn’t just sign JP and say, “Wow! We also got a guy who has 2 rings, and has a great locker room presence too! Besides being the guy we wanted..”

I’m sure all of that was factored in to the decision, aren’t you?

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
10:13 pm

Steve W,

Of course that’s what his agent said.

I just think if Sund was a good GM, then he would have found a way to make the deals more favorable.

Why not offer Bibby 2 years, $16 mil, and then a third year team option for $6 mil? That way he gets an extra $2 mil per year, and the hawks have the option of keeping him for a 3rd year.

At his age, was Bibby going to sign with a non-playoff team?

I know its a risk, but good GMs know how to play their cards. I think Rick Sund just plays it safe…

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:16 pm

Now MC was on vacation from the 16th of July until August, so news was kinda hard to come by during that stretch….

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:22 pm

O’Brien – I def. wouldn’t have offered 8m per to Bibby, not even for 2 years. The guy was coming off of a 14.9m per year contract, but he had clearly declined. Who could know that Bibby would pull a Koncak on us?

I was going to get you quote from Portland, lobbying for Bibby before they got Miller, calling his contract “modest” and “reasonable”. But his is getting old. You think Sund overpaid. All I’m saying is following it at the time, it was just about market value, slightly overpaid, but you did it to please the 5 year vet Coach who was in a contract year, and give him no excuses for not winning.

So we may could have saved a mil a year. That’s not much in this world of NBA high finance.

But I can show you some bad contracts, if people need to be reminded…

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
10:22 pm

SteveW;
I have yet to figure why LD is off the Larry Brown coaching tree?
Please explain.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:22 pm

“his” should be “this’ in my last post

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
10:25 pm

SteveW, not sure how trading Childress for a 2nd round pick was genius? No, I was not interested in bringing him back, but there wasn’t a person on this blog who thought as a #6 pick that he was worth a ‘basically wasted’ 2nd rounder. The wasted part remains to be seen when we pick but Sund to me does not do anything magical. You can what-if about Marvin, Zaza, anyone. That part is over.

Sund’s true test as a GM will be seen whether this team makes any headway this playoff season with this roster. Its a shame I am hearing a potential Battier to Boston deal at this point because Houston sounds like they want to shake things up, unlike our current basketball expert.

Battier and Brooks fit this roster well; we get our midrange defender, we get a slasher and high energy guy, and we improve the starting 5 in 2 positions, which would be unheard of after 2/3 of the season.

KevinM

February 21st, 2011
10:32 pm

OB, since this Melo deal is nearly done, prepare to see the Knicks pose a serious threat to the 5th playoff slot.
It won’t take much to blend Melo and Billups into the Knicks’ pick and roll schemes. They lose some of their balanced talent, but it should be worth it to get Amare some big time help.

No excuses going forward, as Joe would say.

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
10:33 pm

Knicks are going to have to score 110 pts a game to beat anyone.

they gave up an awful lot.. Gallinari and Chandler are pretty good wing defenders..

Melvin

February 21st, 2011
10:35 pm

ESPN is reporting that Melo is a Knick. I think the trade wont be official until tomorrow when the NBA office re-opens…

The four team above the Hawks and the team behind the Hawks have made major addition to their teams since this summer. Now what is Sund and ASG going to do?

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
10:37 pm

Raymond Felton on the block..

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
10:40 pm

so is the reason why the Knicks wanted to act this season is so Carmelo can get the most money vs having to leave it on the table by signing w/ the Knicks this off season or taking the money w/ the Nets..

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:42 pm

Grandad – Here’s where I get that. LD assisted Woody longer than he assisted anywhere, 6 years if I’m not mistaken. And here is Woody’s bio from NBA.com

“His days in Motown were the foundation for many of the coaching principles he attempts to instill within his players. Learning from Hall of Fame coach Larry Brown, Woodson has continued to stress “doing things the right way” – working hard, putting the team first and dedicating themselves to becoming the best players they can be, as they work together to build a winning organization, on-and-off the court.”

So I would assume that since Woody is part of the Larry Brown tree, and LD spent so much time under Woody, he’s part of the same influence.

But of course Woody is no Larry Brown in terms of success…

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
10:42 pm

NeNe .. Big Moz.. JR.. and Raymond Felton all on block.. sheesh.

O'Brien

February 21st, 2011
10:44 pm

Melo deal is finally done.

and the Knicks have no depth.

Bigdave,

I think Nene will be available too.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:45 pm

KevinM – First of all, Sund didn’t draft Childress, BK did.

But Sund did quickly assess that Childress was not worth what he was asking. So Sund looks like a smart guy for not signing him, because Josh has turned out to be somewhat of a major bust in Phoenix at 5-6m per year.

That’s what I meant.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:46 pm

There are NBA types that say that ‘Melo and Amare can’t work together in D’Antoni’s style. And we all know how certain players thrive in certain systems. They’ll be good, but it remains to be seen how good.

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
10:48 pm

hopefully Dwight wants to come home and makes the Magic send him ..

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
10:49 pm

Miami Herald – “The paper reported that the Nuggets are sending Anthony, Chauncey Billups, Shelden Williams, Anthony Carter and Renaldo Balkman to New York.

The Nuggets will receive Raymond Felton, Danilo Gallinari, Wilson Chandler, Timofey Mozgov, the Knicks’ 2014 first-round draft pick, the Warriors’ 2012 second-round pick, the Warriors’ 2013 second-round pick and $3 million in cash.”

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/02/21/2078557/report-melo-to-knicks-in-huge.html#ixzz1EejuZlnv

Billups makes this trade bigger than it already is. Now that guys a winner, and if anybody can lead the Knicks to a championship, that guy can.

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
10:50 pm

our schedule just got a little easier w/ 2 games left against Denver..

that remaining Knick game just got a bit more interesting.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
10:50 pm

JoJo the Godfather

point # 1
Sesssions = 4.8 to 1.8 career assist to TO ratio
this yr it’s 5.3 to 1.9
*[not too shabby]
Teague = 0.7 to 0.8 career asst to TO ratio
and this year 0.7 to 0.9
** point # 1 debunked

#2 accurate
#3 accurate

point #4 up for debate:
sessions has always been a willing defender
gets in stance
gives effort
quick and athletic
I’ve never read where he is a “good” defender however.
Neither have I read where he is a “bad” defender.

There are two ends of the spectrum;
Battier = a great defender,
Sasha Vujacic = a horrible defender,
there is a middle somewhere
and I suspect Sessions lies somewhere in the twain.

Melvin

February 21st, 2011
10:51 pm

Knicks gave up a lot to get Melo but Billups, Fields, Melo and Amare is a pretty solid 4 man tandem….

doc

February 21st, 2011
10:55 pm

stevew says:

There are NBA types that say that ‘Melo and Amare can’t work together in D’Antoni’s style. And we all know how certain players thrive in certain systems. They’ll be good, but it remains to be seen how good.

as a reminder stevew, seems this summer folks were saying the same thing about the heat. if billups along for the ride then things will gel just fine.

nets did what they wanted which was to weaken the knicks by forcing them to add more to the pot.

88hawksfan

February 21st, 2011
10:57 pm

Did I watch a different games? IMO, Amere did not eat Al’s lunch. I think Al played the better game in NY against Amare. Amare did play better at the all star game, but not against Al in NY last week. Did you see what Al did to him when Amare tried to take the chair from under Al: Straight to the basket. Embarrassing for Amare. Did you see Al block Amare’s shot? Amare ate Al’s lunch? Really?

lewis

February 21st, 2011
10:59 pm

man you gotta go after felton no one is untouchable

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
11:04 pm

the Nets also are in play for Gallinari and Moz.. for 2 first rounders..

i like Prokhorov’s style.

hey, the lost Melo but the Nuggets actually coming away good.

bigdave

February 21st, 2011
11:05 pm

*they

the work of shrewd front offices ..

lucky for their fans.

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
11:07 pm

LOL . . ESPN just took the Chicago game on ESPN off the board . . and replaced it with the March 6th game vs the Knicks.

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
11:07 pm

Unless that was done previously, and I just missed it.

Hawk n the Ham

February 21st, 2011
11:10 pm

The Melo trade is more of a bummer to see other team’s GMs’ actually earn a living.

Sund has the best job in the world. To earn his paycheck all he has to do is publicly say, “I like our core”.

northcyde

February 21st, 2011
11:10 pm

Barring a total collapse by us, the Knicks won’t be able to catch us for the 4th or 5th seed. But they do have a fairly easy schedule and could definitely put pressure on both us and Orlando to play well down the stretch.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
11:13 pm

SteveW
LD credits Byron Scott, Doug Collins and Alvin Gentry as mentors.
Can’t really blame him for not listing Woody.

I think he and Byron Scott were together when they “cooked up”
this current version of the motion offense. [NJ]

Ramon Sessions well versed in Byron Scott’s offense…..hmmmmmmm.

lewis

February 21st, 2011
11:14 pm

i checked earlier today and that game was supposed to be on espn

at least we were on national tv a lot last year

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:20 pm

Big Dave – Are you sure we have another game left against the Knicks? I think we’re done with them.

Grandad – I have read were Sessions is a bad defender. But I sure hope all of that is wrong if we obtain him.

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
11:21 pm

Battier switches to Boston;
I’m goin’ over with him.
I cannot begin to imagine how good the Celts
will be with Battier !
They will be old but who cares,
they will be good.
Plus, they will play the game the right way.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:23 pm

Grandad – Yep, I was just about to post about Gentry, Scott, and Collins. But know, being mentored by Woody wouldn’t help his chances with the Hawks. Ha!

Wabe

February 21st, 2011
11:24 pm

Hawk n the Ham

February 21st, 2011
11:10 pm
The Melo trade is more of a bummer to see other team’s GMs’ actually earn a living.

Sund has the best job in the world. To earn his paycheck all he has to do is publicly say, “I like our core”.

Co-sign 100%.

lewis

February 21st, 2011
11:26 pm

The Point Forward – si.com

The passing of a wild All-Star weekend means we have digested, barfed up and re-digested most of the key storylines that will define the last 30 games of the regular season: the trade deadline, from ‘Melo to (Troy) Murphy, and all its implications; whether the looming lockout has made teams gun-shy; the recent struggles of the Lakers; what is shaping up to be a dynamite six-team playoff race in the bottom half of the Western Conference; the return of Roddy Buckets; the rise of the Bulls; and many, many more.

But here’s one underplayed storyline I’m very curious about: We’re about to learn a lot about the Atlanta Hawks, and what we learn could have a significant impact on the future of the franchise and the Eastern Conference.

On the surface, the Hawks are having a fine season. They’re 34-21, tied with the powerful Magic in the loss column and on pace for 51 wins, just two fewer than last season. They’ve played more road games than home, and their 17-12 road record is one of the best in the league — typically a predictor of good things in the playoffs. Watch any Atlanta game, and you’re almost certain to hear the opponents’ announce team describe the Hawks as some sort of forgotten contender.

But peel away the surface gloss, and this looks like a mediocre team masquerading as an interesting playoff club, and there’s a good chance we’re about to see the Hawks tumble toward a win total in the mid-to-high 40s and first-round exit. The bad news starts with this: Atlanta ranks 15th in points per possession and 13th in points allowed per possession, just a tick above league average in both categories. That marks them as an average club, and its statistical profile suggests it should be something like 30-25, according to Basketball-Reference.

Even worse: Atlanta has managed this against what has been the easiest schedule in the league by a wide margin. That is going to change, immediately. Its remaining opponents have a combined winning percentage of about .550, giving Atlanta by far the hardest schedule among Eastern Conference teams. The Hawks follow the All-Star break with a five-game West Coast road swing that includes four games against playoff contenders. They still face the Lakers, Blazers, Heat and Nuggets twice each, and they have three games left against a Chicago team that should have both Joakim Noah and Carlos Boozer in tow.

And if you watch the Hawks, you know this team has not solved any of its foundational problems, despite all the early praise for coach Larry Drew’s decision to ditch the Iso-Joe offense that bogged down so often against elite teams. Things started well on that end, with the Hawks scoring more efficiently and getting to the line more often — the latter an expected result of a motion offense designed to get defenders on their heels.

Now? Only four teams get to the line less often, per shot attempt, and the Hawks’ offensive rebounding — once a key strength — has vanished. They still isolate too much, and they fare poorly when they do; only six teams score fewer points per possession on isolation plays, according to the stat-tracking service Synergy Sports. They still don’t use Al Horford enough, and they still take far too many long two-point jumpers; only the Wizards, Heat and Bulls attempt more, according to Hoopdata. Atlanta is an efficient transition team, but it continues to play at one of the slowest paces in the league.

The defense has been solid, but suffers from the same fundamental problems that have bubbled up for years. Mike Bibby can’t defend point guards, forcing Drew to scramble for solutions to what is really an intractable issue. He’ll order the Hawks to switch on pick-and-rolls, a classic Hawks strategy that was supposed to be a bugaboo this season. He’ll use Joe Johnson on point guards for extended stretches and hide Bibby elsewhere, but teams with good balance will find a way to exploit the mismatches that move creates. When that blows up, Drew will go to a zone defense that has been inconsistent on good nights and awful on bad ones. The Hawks lean on Bibby for shooting and Jamal Crawford for scoring, and it’s just hard to play good defense with both of those guys on the floor.

The Johnson-Josh Smith-Horford foundation is solid, and this team can play with anyone on a night when everything is clicking. But the bigger picture is one of mediocrity and points strongly toward a poor last 30 games and a first-round loss to the Magic — the same team that demolished the Hawks last season by 25 points per game in a four-game humiliation. The Hawks have won two of their three games against the Magic this season, and Drew’s decision to start Jason Collins at center as a counter to Dwight Howard has appeared to bother Orlando. But Atlanta fans who point to those two games as a playoff harbinger are getting carried away. History suggests that regular-season head-to-head matchups mean little in the postseason. Also: One of Atlanta’s wins came before Orlando’s big trades and the other in the Magic’s first game with Gilbert Arenas, Jason Richardson and Hedo Turkoglu.

You’ll recall that Orlando’s destruction of the Hawks came in the second round last season. Ditto with Cleveland’s 2009 sweep of the Hawks, in which the Cavs won every game by double digits. A first-round loss and, say, 48 wins would be a huge step back for a franchise that has talked about moving forward in its development.

And such a step back could result in the jettisoning of multiple players once thought to be franchise cornerstones. The Hawks are on the hook for between $31 and $35 million combined to Horford and Johnson every year through the 2015-16 season. Barring some sort of amnesty or salary rollbacks in the new collective bargaining agreement, they’re going to be totally capped out until after the 2012-13 season, when deals for Zaza Pachulia and Smith expire. Marvin Williams is scheduled to earn about $8 million per year through 2013-14.

This does not look good for the Hawks, obviously. They can either ride with this group through 2013 even though they don’t appear to be anywhere close to contending, or they can try to move long-term money soon in an attempt to free up some cap space earlier. They’re reportedly open to moving Williams now, and though he hasn’t produced at a level that matches his salary (or draft status — sorry, Hawks fans), he feels like a guy who will produce as an important role player on a good team. And everyone around the league is waiting for Atlanta to seriously dangle Smith, a move that would make me sad, since Smith, having just turned 25, should be a franchise keeper and not someone you deal because you badly overpaid Johnson.

The worst thing: Even if the Hawks manage to move one of these guys, they still may not be able to do much on the free-agent market until 2013 — particularly if the new CBA includes a reduced salary cap.

Maybe this team will prove the math wrong over the next two or three months. Maybe it will come together, rise to the level of its competition and at least push its first-round opponent to six or seven games. Maybe it’ll even advance to the conference semifinals again.

But I wouldn’t bet on it.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:27 pm

doc – Yes, but I always thought the big 3 could work together. But to me, ‘Melo is halfcourt, Amare is full court. And how is Shelden going to work in a fast break O? I think Billups can go fastbreak or halfcourt O.

I can see where they really don’t fit. But time will tell, and they should at least be entertaining.

I think within 2 years, Amare will be hurt, and ‘Melo will end his career with being often injured, and this turns out bad. But this year, with Billups, they may cause some problems.

So what if the Knicks get the 5th seed. I kinda hope they do. I’d rather face the Bulls in the first round. We definitely have more experience than Deng, Noah, and Rose in the playoffs..

lewis

February 21st, 2011
11:27 pm

Horford talks Hawks’ playoff potential, trades
ATLANTA HAWKS | COMMENTS

Al Horford said the Hawks feel confident in their ability to go far into the postseason this year. (Ray Amati/NBAE via Getty Images)

I touched on Atlanta’s upcoming schedule and long-term cap situation Monday morning. In a happy coincidence, Al Horford and I are two of the few NBA-related out-of-towners still in Los Angeles. We met for a one-on-one at the NBA’s Jam Session on Monday, and Horford answered a bunch of questions about the state of the Hawks, the Eastern Conference and his jump shot. Here’s what he had to say:

The Point Forward: You guys are having another nice season at 34-21, but you’ve got by far the toughest remaining schedule among Eastern Conference teams. Is that something you talk about as a team? Do you worry about that in terms of playoff seeding?

Horford: [laughing] I actually wasn’t aware of that, man — that we have the toughest schedule. I didn’t know that. So it’s one of those things where we’re going to have to take it game by game. You can’t look ahead at all. A lot of those games are at home, so at least that’s a good thing. (Note: 15 of Atlanta’s 27 remaining games are indeed at home.)

PF: As things stand now, you would face Orlando in the 4-5 series in the first round. We all know what happened last season in the playoffs, but you guys have beaten them twice this season with Jason Collins starting at center against Dwight Howard. Are you guys more confident you can beat Orlando in a seven-game series if it comes to that?

Horford: Oh, yeah. We’re a lot more confident against them this season as opposed to last season. If we have to do it, we do feel like we have a really good chance.

PF: The Eastern Conference is better this season and going forward than it was a year ago, with Chicago on the rise and Miami set for the next half-decade. Do you look at your record — you’re on pace for about the same number of wins this year as last — and your cap situation and worry about the team’s place in the conference in the next few years?

Horford: No question. You have to look at that. Everyone else is getting better, and that opens up questions as to what your team is doing and whether we need to make changes. What happens in this postseason is going to be really important in that sense.

PF: The worst-case scenario is that you lose in the first round, which would be a step back from where you finished the last two seasons. Would that change your long-term view of the franchise?

Horford: I definitely agree that would be a huge step back or us. We feel like we do have the capability to go deep into the playoffs.

PF: Let me be more specific — you guys are pretty much capped out until 2013, at least as things stand now. That raises the possibility of either going forward with this group of guys or making a move to free up cap space before then. Is that something you guys talk about internally — the possibility that someone like Marvin Williams or Josh Smith could get moved, even in the next three days before the trade deadline? Would you support something like that?

Horford: I don’t worry about it, and it’s not something we talk about as players. We don’t talk about the salary cap. But I do want to be in a position where I can win and be successful, and whatever it takes for us to do that, I’ll be supportive of that.

PF: There have been reports that the team has put Marvin Williams on the block. Do you ignore those, or do you start thinking in your head about what the team would be like without him?

Horford: Oh, yeah, you think about it. Marvin is one of our core guys. He’s a starter. You wonder about it, for sure. But the general manager [Rick Sund] makes those decisions, not us. He’ll do whatever he feels is best. Same thing with Josh. It can really be any of us.

PF: Let’s talk about on-court stuff. There was a lot of hype earlier in the season about Larry Drew moving away from so many isolations and implementing a new motion-style offense. But how different are things, really, from your perspective? Sometimes I watch you guys, and the offense — the sets and stuff — do look a lot more motion-oriented. But in other games, like against the Knicks before the All-Star break, you tend to isolate more — and in that game, you had good matchups to do it.

Horford: We’re a little bit more of a half-court team this season. Last year we were running more. And I think we need to get out and run more and freelance more. Coach Drew is doing a good job, it’s just that sometimes we tend to get away from running more and the things we do best.

PF: When I hear players say that — that the team is not always doing what it should be doing on offense — I always wonder why that is. Is it because of the coach’s philosophy and play-calling, or are players breaking plays on the court and improvising? Some of both?

Horford: It’s both. A lot of times, we as players get caught up in saying, “Oh, we’ve got a mismatch!” But teams in this league are very good at positional defense. They’ll double-team you and front you and really disrupt that mismatch.

PF: You guys are playing a lot more zone defense this season. Do you feel it’s working? Do you like it?

Horford: It’s really different for us. We weren’t used to it at first. But it’s always good to mix it up on teams. Overall, it’s OK. I’d rather play man-to-man, though.

PF: You’ve got a pretty unique-looking jump shot, in terms of form. It obviously works, but it’s not textbook form. Your feet come apart and you almost tend to slide instead of jump, it looks like. Have coaches tried to change that form?

Horford: I’ve worked a lot with Mark Price, and he told me that it’s really all about footwork. But he did say that he wasn’t going to change my form. He wants me to use my legs a little bit more, and that seems to work for me.

As for my feet, the further the shot is from the hoop, the more I tend to be square. As I get closer to the rim, my right legs goes in front of my left leg a bit for some reason.

PF: You mentioned going further from the hoop. Any plans to add the three-point shot to your game?

Horford: Yeah, eventually. I have to put in the work, but it’ll be a part of my game I some point. I made a couple last season. [Note: Horford is 2-of-11 career from deep, with both makes coming last season — one in the regular season, one in the playoffs.)

Grandad

February 21st, 2011
11:29 pm

SteveW

LD is not going to play Teague or JC2
so, use those assets to find someone who will play
and contribute now.
Alot of times defense is “want to”.
If we get him, then it’s up to LD to provide the motivation.
Let’s just do something…anything…everyones movin’ and shakin’
but we stand still.

lewis

February 21st, 2011
11:29 pm

Hawks cannot beat the Bulls. Kurt Thomas owns us.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:33 pm

Lewis – I saw that earlier. The biggest flaw? After this West Coast road trip, we play 12 of 15 at home in March. That’s worth something.

But who could have seen LD as a guy who wouldn’t develop young talent? I sure didn’t see it coming.

And that SI writer is an idiot, I think. The Heat, Bulls, Lakers, Magic etc. are in alot worse cap space problems than we are.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:35 pm

Grandad – I sure understand that. I wish the Cavs would take Bibby and our two 2nd picks the next two years for Sessions. At least then we would have a good young BC with Sessions and Teague. Maybe LD would be forced to play them

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:36 pm

And in that trade, we would still have the Suns 2nd pick this year, and Houston’s next year, both of which figure to be better than ours.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:46 pm

Lewis – Thanks for the post. Good stuff.

2012-13 cap – For example – Miami has 65+ mill committed to 6 players: an aging DWade, a 33 year old (then) Mike Miller, a 32 year, undersized PF in Haslem, LeBron and Bosh.

We have 61+m committed to 7 players: a 31 year old super athlete JJ, a 27 year old Josh, 26 year olds Al and Marvin, 24 year olds JT and JC2, and a guy who turns 29 during the sesaon, ZaZa.

We’ve got more players, more cap space, younger players – Who’s in the worse cap position, us or the Heat?

The Bulls will have Boozer pulling down about 19m, Deng about 19m, Noah 12m, and who knows how much Rose will be making. Did that without looking, numbers may be off a bit. But they’re toast, and know it. They’re desp. trying to move Deng, so they can sign Rose. And watch Boozer get hurt, he does alot.

The Magic have Hedo on the hook for about 11m, and Arenas for 21m or so – that’s terrible.

We are in good cap space compared to the rest of the League.

Even the Knicks will have an aging, injured Amare, and Melo making 22m per, and he’s hurt alot.

Freshfromatl

February 21st, 2011
11:47 pm

I can almost guarantee there is going to be a trade involving the Hawks before the deadline. I don’t know how large the trade will be but I would be absolutly floored if the Hawks didn’t make a move.

SteveW

February 21st, 2011
11:48 pm

I forgot the beast – Joel Anthony off the Heat above – they’re committed to mister 7.0 PER for 5 years as well.

Najeh Davenpoop

February 21st, 2011
11:50 pm

“His TS jumped from 51% to 54% to 57%, and his PER has jumped from 12.2 in 2006-2007 to 16.0 in 2008-2009. The guy seems to being making progress each and every season. ”

Unfortunately, he abruptly stopped progressing right after he signed that extension.

SteveW

February 22nd, 2011
12:05 am

Najeh – You are exactly correct

Najeh Davenpoop

February 22nd, 2011
12:10 am

Well, now that this trade is over, no more excuses. Time to make the Hawks better, Pretty Ricky.

Najeh Davenpoop

February 22nd, 2011
12:14 am

ESPN’s poll: “Which of these teams is the favorite to represent the East in the NBA Finals?”

The choices: Heat, Celtics, Bulls, Knicks, Magic

We like our core.

SteveW

February 22nd, 2011
12:19 am

I really think we are in be respectable now, wait for the Heat, Celts, Lakers, Knicks, Magic, and Bulls to collapse in the next couple of years, then make our move. That’s how we’re set up anyway.

But Tricky Ricky may surprise us.

J.J.M

February 22nd, 2011
12:28 am

trade for nuggets nene

Fussball Fan

February 22nd, 2011
12:40 am

Steve W., are you really serious?!!? Wait for the Heat, Celtics, Lakers, Knicks, Magic and Bulls to collapse!! ROFL!! These teams have something that the Hawks do not and have not ever had……aggressive and intelligent front offices. These teams/organizations are intent on getting to the Finals. The Hawks, umm, not so much. So again, let me get this straight, our only hope is to wait for 6 teams (5 of whom have made significant upgrades/moves over the year, while the Hawks “like their core”) to collapse. I have to thank you though, I had a real rough day, now you’ve made me end my day with slide splitting laughter. You should take your show on the road.

slimjr

February 22nd, 2011
12:40 am

“Spot on..the easiest schedule by far the first 2/3 of the season, and now the toughest…future opponents are at .550….here we go!”

Yes, the real Hawks will be revealed and it will not be pretty down the stretch! Down goes Frazier!
PREDICTION: AFTER THIS NEXT MELTDOWN, SUND AND JC1 WALK!!!!!! BOTH CONTRACTS ARE FINISHED…………….BYE RICK SUND, YOU WILL NOT BE MISSED……………….

88hawksfan

February 22nd, 2011
12:40 am

In an unrelated story, when the Hakws played Charlotte the other say and I saw (ex-Hawks player) Jackson, I said, oh, oh, he could be trouble. There is always that player in every team that just kills the Hawks. What surprises me is that from the Hawks coach on down everyone seems surprised that Jackson had such a good game against the Hawks and hit the 3-point shot that sealed the loss for the Hawks in that game. Really? No one thought he would be the one to do the Hawks in? Mo defended as well as he could have defended and Jackson still made the shot. That’s why we should have forced the ball off his hands and let someone else beat us.

Rev in Tampa

February 22nd, 2011
3:51 am

Freshfromatl,

I understand your belief that a trade will happen before the deadline. With the Hawks weaknesses at center and point so glaring, the unbalance of the team, and the players who have become available in the aftermath the Melo-drama, it is only rational the Hawks would make a move. I felt the same logical imperative this summer when Shaq was available. The logic was irresistable, but nothing happened. If a trade occurs I think it will underwhelm us. We may pick up Sessions in exchange for some of our spare parts. But I am not holding my breath waiting on Sund to find a way to bring in Nene, Felton, etc. I think Big Ray was right when he observed that Sund is reactionary rather than proactive.

Rev in Tampa

February 22nd, 2011
4:04 am

A BIG THANK YOU to everyone who has posted over the past several hours. The debate has been sustained at a much higher level than I can remember. It has been very enjoyable to read.

Thank god Rick Sund contract is expiring end of this season. He has over paid Bibby, Zaza, Joe, and Mervin and he has one of the worst draft picks for the last 10 years. The ASG has been trying to win, but they keep hiring the wrong Gms, the problem with

February 22nd, 2011
7:57 am

Enter your comments here

ryan

February 22nd, 2011
9:29 am

I saw on ESPN rumors that the Hawks are interested in Devin Harris i rather take Harris over Sessions .

W.R.Terrell

February 22nd, 2011
1:19 pm

Joe Johnson still an All-Star, but he had doubts. LOLOLOL…I have serious doubts also. Lets face it the Hawks gave away too much money for his kind of play and they will never reap the rewards because there are none. I see Devin Harris name is being mentioned and Ramon Sessions as a possible point guard replacement for Mike Bibby. They will have the same headaches, Josh the smoove” smith. Who thinks he’s Mr. everything will grab a rebound and bring it upcourt and anything the point was seeing is over and done with. Stop blaming Mike Bibby, he’s not your scape goat. Here’s an idea, how about some plain and simple basketball sense….ooops..I’m sorry THERE’S NONE!!!!

Samuel

February 22nd, 2011
5:12 pm

Horford: We’re a little bit more of a half-court team this season. Last year we were running more. And I think we need to get out and run more and freelance more. Coach Drew is doing a good job, it’s just that sometimes we tend to get away from running more and the things we do best.

You guys whined to no end about us running more under Woody. Everytime I hear an LD interview he’s talking about “controlling the tempo”/slowing the ball down. LD is full of sh_t.