
The Hawks can use Teague's skills but he can't get regular minutes. (Benny Sieu / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
Back on Dec. 16, before the Hawks played the Celtics at TD Garden, I had a conversation with L.D. about his team’s pick-and-roll defense. I noted that, according to Synergy Sports Technology, his team ranked next-to-last in the league at defending pick-and-roll ballhandlers (they now rank 28th, allowing .91 points per possession).
(Synergy counts only those times when the screen-roll ballhandler is “responsible for the ending action which can be a shot attempt, turnover or drawing a foul that results in free throws.” So it does not count the times when the initial pick-and-roll leads to other actions as the Hawks scramble. Notably, the Hawks rank first in the league at defending the roll man, allowing only .82 points per possession. I ‘m thinking this is what is known as “The Josh Smith effect.”)
So I asked L.D. how the Hawks could ever hope to be effective defending the perimeter given the guys who are playing the most minutes:
“Looking at our personnel, a lot of it involves Mike. Teams know that. We try and disguise some things to not have him as involved. He is at the stage of his career where it is tough for him to defend pick-and-rolls and teams know that. We try to do some things to disguise it, try to manipulate it. He is not the only one. We have just got guys with the initial impact of the ball, they have a hard time with it. We just try to manipulate it a little bit to make it a little bit easier for him. It’s something we will continue to work at.”
This naturally led to a question about Teague. I let L.D. know I was not trying to suggest that Teague is a cure-all for the team’s woes defending the pick-and-roll but certainly he is the best option the Hawks have right now. He has the potential to become even better at it as he gains experience and sees more situations.
Is it that L.D. believes Teague is giving up too much offensively in relation to Bibby and Jamal to give Teague more minutes?
“I’m trying to find that balance. You give up certain things with certain guys. Teague has the speed, the quickness, the footspeed to defend the pick-and-roll. But you give up things in other areas with him on the floor. He vs. Mike on the floor, obviously Mike is a shotmaker and you give that up. It’s tick for tack. You try to get both guys better in areas where they are deficient. You try to get Mike better at defending the pick-and-rolls, We have got to manipulate it a little bit and help him out as much as you can with that. Teague, because he does a pretty good job with it, we constantly try to improve his shot and keep him in an attack mode offensively and get to the basket and finishing. You give up something on one end, you give up something else at the other.”
This is a good time to compare Teague’s production and efficiency in 2009-10 to this season so far.
Teague’s production per 36 minutes is better in nearly every category. His effective field-goal percentage, true-shooting percentage, assist percentage, rebound percentage and block percentage are all improved. His turnover percentage is up slightly. Teague’s usage percentage is down even as his minutes are up. The numbers may not look as good if he were to get even more minutes, and chances are he will never be an offensive threat like Bibby and Jamal, but Teague is not killing the Hawks offensively and there are signs he’s getting better.
Back to Boston: Hours after that conversation with L.D., Teague had probably his best game of the season. Afterward, Teague talked about taking L.D.’s message to heart and focusing on being aggressive and assertive. L.D. praised Teague’s play: “That’s what I am looking for. I need that.” Drew said this in a way that made me think that he really does want Teague to become a permanent fixture in the rotation and believes he can do it.
And so what happened from there? Teague played 15 solid minutes in the next game against Charlotte, then seven minutes at New Jersey and eight vs. Orlando. Teague got 18 minutes against Cleveland, then a DNP-CD against New Orleans. Jamal sat out all of those games except New Orleans, and there are some good pick-and-roll teams among that group. Yet Teague still couldn’t get consistent minutes.
That led to last night at Milwaukee. Before the game I reminded L.D. of our conversation at Boston and asked him if he still thought Teague was too much of a liability offensively in relation to Jamal and Bibby to warrant a permanent spot in the rotation:
“He certainly brings the speed aspect to what we do and we definitely need that. When he is playing with that kind of reckless abandonment with his speed, we are effective. He has to know when to punch it and when to back off. Certainly his speed is something we don’t have, and hopefully he will continue to learn and continue to get better in that area because that is something we desperately need from him. I didn’t play him last night but certainly looking to get him in there tonight, especially against Boykins.”
And then Drew did get Teague in there, and Teague had another fine game while playing 18 minutes. Afterward Teague talked about Lester Conner staying in his ear and encouraging him to impact the game. Drew praised Teague’s performance.
So what will all this mean for Teague from here on out? Based on what’s happened so far, it’s hard to say. The whole thing has been a bit confusing. As an organization the Hawks talked all summer about the importance of Teague becoming a major contributor. Then he got hurt in training camp and fell behind. It seems he’s been playing catch-up ever since and hasn’t always been afforded the opportunity to work his way through rough stretches or rewarded for his good performances.
Certainly L.D. has given Teague more opportunities than his predecessor on the bench. But I think a fair interpretation of events is that, despite L.D.’s stated desire to mold the Hawks into a defensive team and develop his young players, his decisions in this matter reflect a different tact. (Shoot, it makes me wonder how willing he’d be to stick with the promising “big” lineup if Twin were a young guy. Would it just mean more Etan Thomas?)
Since L.D.’s actions with Teague don’t always match his words, I can only conclude that he is reluctant to reduce minutes for his two veteran “shotmakers” with defensive deficiencies for the sake of finding more playing time for his most physically-gifted perimeter defender. This is happening even though L.D. says the team needs Teague’s skill set, Teague has shown signs of improving offensively and he is key to both the team’s fortunes this season and in the future.
Drew has said that because Jamal, Bibby and Teague have such contrasting strengths and weaknesses he’s always thinking about making adjustments on the fly. He doesn’t have one guard who can do it all so he’s trying to match his available pieces to situations. But so far Teague seems to be getting lost in that equation. Stay tuned, blog people.
MC
196 comments Add your comment
Melvin
December 28th, 2010
4:43 pm
MC, you nail this one on the head. LD says one thing and does another just like his predecessor, Woody. It’s easy to see they prefer to play Bibby/Jamal over the Teague. Although both guys have a better jumpshot than Teague, they both give up probably just as many points that they score. I would prefer to have Teague play more mins and gain experience b/c he’s probably (and will become) better in just about every other aspect of the game.
doc
December 28th, 2010
4:48 pm
nice mc, nice.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
4:51 pm
Has any team ever went to the Finals with a starting PG as limited defensively as Bibby or JC1 is?
lewis
December 28th, 2010
4:56 pm
fine blogging mc
i’d rather have teague attempt dunks, floaters and layups while he works on his jumper than Bibby and Jamal hoisting jumpers together, ruining the flow of the offense and not changing the pace of the game or playing D.
I mean, if he sucks, bench him. But i think he’s deserved a shot to at least break the rotation. What are Mo, Zaza and others doing that he cannot?
Coach D
December 28th, 2010
4:56 pm
Awesome blog, M.C. I understand L.D. wanting to get W’s, but at what cost to Teague’s confidence and development? Today, Bibby & Crawford will give the Hawks more w’s, “tomorrow” they’ll be gone and we’ll be left scratching our heads looking for another NBA team to cheer.
In my opinion L.D. needs to give Teague the “sink or swim” treatment.
Brett
December 28th, 2010
4:57 pm
what difference will a few loses make, we are going to be a 4,5,6 seed anyway? play this guy and see if he is the deal or not. bibby’s days are numbered. let’s be real, this season is a transition year (again) so we might as well work for the future. let’s season the kid up or let him prove he isn’t the answer. Sund needs to demand this. LD like Woody is playing for today. Guys look who is ahead of us. We ain’t overcoming Miami or Boston.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
4:57 pm
Really nice blog piece MC. I actually don’t think Teague has much of a future in the league beyond being a back-up pg, but even that is iffy given that he doesn’t have one particular facet of his game that can be specialized. He did look good against the Bucks, but there aren’t many Boykins in the league.
I do like the “big” line-up, if for nothing else than making Marvin play with a chip on his shoulder. I wonder in the long run if Josh at the 3 doesn’t hurt his defense. I don’t mind him guarding the wing and he certainly can take advantage on the offensive end, but will his paint presence become less?
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
5:01 pm
LD has no idea what he’s talking about.
He tries to mask all the complaints by making incredibly vague comments, hoping we’ll bite on them
WTF does “We try and disguise some things to not have him as involved.” in regards to Bibby? The dude sucks. He’s old, he’s fat as hell (HE DOES NOT USE HIS MUSCULARITY OR SIZE TO HIS ADVANTAGE. IT HAS RESULTED IN HIS DOWNFALL)
GET MONTA ELLIS
rusty
December 28th, 2010
5:01 pm
Ld needs to get his head out of his butt & start giving more time to jt,mb can’t play more than 25 min a game jt s game is so more in tune with this team than mb. Why the he’ll is he not playing Wilkins & jc2. He needs to start giving jc2 some burn. He has talent right now that moe never had.god darn it ,play him now & the team will be better.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:02 pm
Ramon- the Bulls had BJ Armstrong, John Paxon and Steve Kerr.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:04 pm
MC, thank you for calling LD out. Have you ever asked LD what is his REALISTIC goal for this season with this team, what is he trying to accomplish?
Also, I don’t recall any player in the league being a better defender at the age of 32 than they were in their prime. I don’t see how LD expects Bibby or Crawford to improve defensively, when they’ve BOTH had multiple coaches and never responded to either defensively. Even in the normal line up, Horford and Josh don’t pick up many fouls guarding their men. They normally pick up the fouls AFTER the dribble penetration by the opposing back court.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:08 pm
It is incredible that the bench guys/ scrubs/ low round draft picks are all these All Stars just waiting to happen if only they got more “burn”, or that Rick Sund doesn’t just pluck a star in the making rookie off another team right now. I mean why not just get Tony Parker for Jeff Teague play Damian at the 2 and Jordan Crawford at the 3 and we will win 60+ games and make the finals.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:08 pm
Daniel, the Bulls didn’t have them starting. Remember the last years of the Bulls were Harper and MJ in the back court. And Armstrong didn’t start til 92-93, and then Armstrong was one of the quickest players in the East then also.
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
5:10 pm
Teague must really suck in practice. There’s no other reason that mini-me washed up lard should still be a starter in this league.
Bottom 3 starting PG
Worst defensive PG in NBA
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:12 pm
Ramon- I totally agree with your last post. LD has never really made any statements regarding his goals. He never took any responsibility of the last staff’s failure (despite being the head assistant). He just threw out a “new” motion offense and a bunch of empty words. We still have issues with “starting” flat. Ball movement has improved more from Joe’s elbow surgery than anything else. I will say that Josh seems happier and more focused and Twin has been much more significant than under Woody. But, dang don’t those improvements seem like something that should be made by I don’t know an ASSISTANT COACH?
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:12 pm
Daniel, no one is saying that. But your bench players are there for situational purposes. When you’re playing a quick point guard, there’s NO excuse aside from injury not to give your best defensive PG at least 3 minutes of playing time to see if he can stay in front of the player. Also who can’t see in the last 3 weeks Wilkins played more efficiently than Mo Evans? Name one starting PG in the East that you would take Bibby over on DEFENSE. Now name five starting PGs in the East who penetrates worse than Bibby.
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
5:13 pm
Playing Bibby big minutes on Chris Paul.
That’s like putting Matt Freije in High School on Michael Jordan in his prime
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:15 pm
Lol, Daniel, I would think so. Collins is better because he’s actually in shape. Josh is happier because Woody was just a prick, lol. But as you said the same problems still exist. The first and fourth quarters still remain the Hawks worst statistical quarters. Almost as if the Hawks need to scrimmage 5 minutes before every game to already have their blood going.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:15 pm
Ramon- definitely not counting the Harper years (obviously, he was great). But, BJ did start, and Paxon and Kerr were very significant (and starters occasionally). Obviously, it helps that you have Jordan and Pippen to control the ball and the perimeter defense. But, BJ Armstrong would be a completely forgettable NBA pg (no defense) if he were on another team.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:16 pm
Jeje, I don’t know if its Teague really sucks in practice. Because if you look at the players (Al, Josh, Marvin) they seem to light up when Teague comes in the game.
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
5:16 pm
Bibby should not play over 18 mpg on any team in this league
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:18 pm
Daniel, didn’t Pippen and MJ always guard the opposing PG?
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:19 pm
But you’re right, he wasn’t a good defender. I really couldn’t think of a team that had a starting PG that terrible, but thanks.
Samuel
December 28th, 2010
5:22 pm
“Since L.D.’s actions with Teague don’t always match his words”, translation. LD lies a lot.
Rev in Tampa
December 28th, 2010
5:25 pm
Enter your comments here
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:27 pm
Ramon- I am not say Bibby is the answer at the PG position, but this team is not constructed to be PG driven anyway with ball handlers and playmakers all over the floor (Remember the “motion offense”). The real remaining issue is that we don’t have a true A level player at any position. We have a couple of B+ (Horford/ Joe (?) a B with A flashes but C flashes too (Smith), a slightly better than average bench. A coach who is clearly in over his head, and a team who is settling into being solidly decent but never great. Bibby or Teague are not going to change any of those issues. I know we all wish Teague would become Rondo, but I can wish my Camry was and Audi A6 but it ain’t going to happen.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:28 pm
I meant I am not saying…
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:32 pm
Samuel- that is definitely one way to take it. Or it could be LD doesn’t really have a plan and just goes with it on the fly. Or LD doesn’t have a big picture direction. Or LD is like the Wizard of OZ, look at the shiny “motion offense” don’t look at how the team responds to me or my decisions.
Ramon- Woody may have been a prick (but the team was better with him as HC, YES! I said it.)
Not saying I want Woody back, but Larry Drew? c’mon man he didn’t even do a good job as an assistant.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:34 pm
Daniel, I’ll agree Woody was a better head coach. But the problem is, I don’t believe Woody OR LD were the best available coach for THIS job.
Rev in Tampa
December 28th, 2010
5:36 pm
MC,
Thanks for pressing this issue with the Coach. I kept thinking there had to be a very good reason behind the scenes why Teague wasn’t getting any time since Drew laid out the challenge to take the pg spot back in the summer. But it sounds like there is no real good reason.
I was as impressed as anybody with Bibby’s deadeye 3pt shooting, but when we had a 9 point lead to protect in New Orleans we didn’t need more jumpshooting; we needed some perimeter defense. I am still looking for an answer for why Teague stayed on the bench, but I am now certain an answer will not be forthcoming.
Now that Teague is making consistent strides from game to game, especially since Bibby’s legs need rest, Teague needs to be slotted into the role.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:37 pm
I agree with you Ramon.
Rufus1
December 28th, 2010
5:37 pm
@MC
You need to remind LD that the Celtics won a championship with Rondo at the PG and Perkins at the center…. 2 none offensive players. He needs to get over the Teague’s offense, because his defensive is worth probably 5pts a game
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
5:39 pm
Bibby has shown tremendous effort and work ethic this season. I want to see more Teague to help Teague, but more importantly to protect Bibby for when we need him. Both players need 20+ minutes a night to help Teague develop and to keep Bibby fresh for the playoffs. We need them both. Why can’t LD see that?
JSS
December 28th, 2010
5:42 pm
“Has any team ever went to the Finals with a starting PG as limited defensively as Bibby or JC1″
Steve Kerr in Chicago…
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:43 pm
Daniel, I actually think Bibby is doing a great job this year in comparison to last season. I just believe in certain situations that Teague should be given the chance.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:44 pm
Fundamentals- Because Larry Drew does NOT have a big picture game plan for this team. He is just playing caretaker.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
5:46 pm
JSS Steve Kerr didn’t start in Chicago.
Daniel
December 28th, 2010
5:48 pm
I think that is the real point of MC’s discussion with Drew. The issue to me isn’t how good is Teague or how bad is Bibby (etc.). The truth being Teague isn’t as good as we hope and Bibby isn’t as bad as we fear. The issue remains that LD doesn’t have any kind of consistent game plan or goal! The issue of Teague’s development (or lack thereof) is just a perfect example of it.
Rufus1
December 28th, 2010
5:58 pm
@Daniel
Woodson was not a batter coach! Last year the Hawks had very few injuries. This year JJ has missed 9 games and jamal has missed 5…Your top 2 scores missed 14 of your 1st 30 games and we are still 20-13, that is okay.
We have beat the “boogie Man” twice(Magic), Teague, Marvin and Bibby are playing better under LD…and This is just his 1st 2 months. We will still win 50 games and will definately perform better in the Playoffs.
LD will figure out that Teague is our best option, because he can’t keep justifying 15pt 4qt…something Woodson would never have figured out.
cp
December 28th, 2010
6:00 pm
Great write up MC……. I was saying the other day that it seems as if LD is pulling a Woodson and trying to win as many games as possible and not doing the other things he said he would do when given the job……Teague might not be the shot maker Bibby is but he is a better defender and he drives to the hole and draws fouls…As someone said earlier, even with Bibby and Jamal knocking down shots they give it right back up on the defensive end…..I don’t see how he can talk about being better defensively and constantly play your worst perimeter defenders in crucial situations…What is going on with Damien? He was playing some solid defense and made a lot of hustle plays when given minutes now he isn’t playing nor is Josh Powell. LD looks a lot like Woodson out there in many ways.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:02 pm
That’s my point Daniel – LD, like Woody, coaches for the record and the playoff slot, not for the overall good of the team. Maybe Sund & ASG put expectations on LD and his crew where they can’t be flexible. It just makes you wonder why they so often put immediate gain over the long term benefit of the TEAM. We need Teague for a variety or reasons. We need Bibby for a spot shooter & vet leadership role. Without both excelling we go nowhere but home.
Playoff seed doesn’t matter to me when you’re going to lose to the same 2-3 teams anyway. Who cares when it happens, more importantly if/how it happens that matters to me.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:04 pm
Who here thinks it’s good idea to pursue McGhee w/ Crawford’s expiring?
What about Blatche or Hinrich?
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
6:06 pm
ASG’s #1 goal is for someone on the team to always be injured. That way, they always have a scapegoat when we lose in the Playoffs and can then keep core next year since they hate spending money.
WE HAD INJURIES VS. CLEVELAND AND GOT KILLED IN 4 IN 2009
WE WERE HEALTHY VS. ORLANDO THIS YEAR AND GOT KILLED WORSE THAN ANY TEAM HAS IN NBA HISTORY
WHY DOES NO ONE TALK ABOUT THE CLEVELAND SERIES? WE HAVE NOT IMPROVED IN THE LAST 2 YEARS. WE HAVE GOTTEN WORSE.
I AM THE ONLY PERSON WHO MENTIONS THE CLEVELAND SERIES. PEOPLE ACT LIKE ORLANDO WAS THE ONLY TIME THIS TEAM HAS GOTTEN KILLED.
SUND NEVER ACKNOWLEDGES WE GOT SWEPT 2 YEARS IN A ROW – ONLY ORLANDO
Name (required)
December 28th, 2010
6:08 pm
Fire Larry Drew, Teague should be getting 48mins of playing time.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:08 pm
Even if we lose in the 1st round again to Boston or Miami, it’d be better knowing you’ve coached all your players to be their best and given 100% than losing in the 2nd round b/c you quit knowing several key pieces weren’t ready. See past 3 years for how we as fand reacted to the last 3 losses.
We can respect a good effort. Now go get ready. Seeding and record don’t matter. It’s how you play the game!
Najeh Davenpoop
December 28th, 2010
6:09 pm
“He vs. Mike on the floor, obviously Mike is a shotmaker and you give that up. It’s tic for tac. ”
I prefer Binaca myself.
Great post, though. Nice to have an idea of what LD is thinking.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:10 pm
JeJe – we quit both years b/c we knew in our heart we were outmatched and underprepared. Case in point again in 2011, unless something changes.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 28th, 2010
6:11 pm
“Shoot, it makes me wonder how willing he’d be to stick with the promising “big” lineup if Twin were a young guy. Would it just mean more Etan Thomas?”
I don’t know if any young post player comes into the league understanding as much about post defense as Collins does, so I think it’s kind of a moot point.
rusty
December 28th, 2010
6:18 pm
After watching jc2 play (summer,preseason,& season) I never seen anything to not like. He ball handling looked better than expected,his quickness was certainly there, his inside & outside shooting looked good & I didn’t see any shortcomings on defense. Every time I watch moe I see a lack of all this. When I see jt play I see so much positivity in his game & he brings what we need. Now I want to know what the he’ll ld is seeing in practice.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:23 pm
JC2 is another chapter in how the Hawks fail to develop talent. The kid hasn’t hurt our W/L record one bit when he’s in. A few times he was the catalyst to a win. Why he gets DNP’d is beyond me. He should’ve at least got 4-5 minutes last night in the 1st half. To get no run is senseless, especially if you’re running Mo instead. We know what Mo has. We know what he can bring. We know Mo needs to recover. We know Sund won’t be trading for anyone – so WHY NOT develop the kid.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:25 pm
At least Sy is not in the D-League where he can at least work out and develop his skills. Hopefully he’ll become a starting PG or something. At least he’s getting run instead of rotting now.
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
6:31 pm
“I agree with Collins now starting, the hawks have a good mix of role players and go to men, but no way Josh should be starting over Marvin..i never seen a former #2 pick having to play second fiddle to just a solid player…”
So what your saying is that a guy, (Josh Smith) who has better career numbers in every category, PPG, RPG, APG, FG%, MPG, BPG, SPG, except for 3 point percentage and free throw percentage, was voted as the second best defensive player in the league last year, never gets hurt, and has arguably been the second best player on this team for the last couple of years, should come off the bench behind a guy who has a history of injury, disappears in the vast majority of his games played, does not play with any intensity, and is worse in almost all statistical categories? What if you did your job for 5 straight years, and were better than they guy next to you for 5 years, and then he had a two to three week period, where he produced better than you. Should he get a promotion over you? Think before you type. If you like Marvin’s game, cool, but stop trying to discredit Josh with Marvin. The two players are not even in the same hemisphere offensively or defensively.
JSS
December 28th, 2010
6:36 pm
@ Ramon,,,
My bad, can I have an old ABA Finals point then?
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
6:41 pm
JeJe – can’t a dude’s grandmother show some undying love for her grandkid? It’s Christmas already. Give her a break. She love’s Marvin…and he’s actually doing good.
I think some good old fashion competition would make both Smoove and Marvin better. Bring a big C option so we can have them competing for minutes each night. Seems to wake up Marvin & Smoove needs a head check lately.
L-QUE
December 28th, 2010
6:56 pm
LD is playing job security, and if i was afraid of not showing better than Woody last year, i would move JJ to the point in some game situations , N.O was one where JJ had CP shooting jumpers, LD wont risk his job now to develop J.T he coach like he is afraid.JT nor JC2 will never get a chance as long as BIBBY,JC1,and MO are in the house
Najeh Davenpoop
December 28th, 2010
7:00 pm
Damn, Fundamentals @6:41 beat me to it.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
7:05 pm
Moving Jamal and Mo for a legit C like Kaman, Camby, Pryzbilla, McGhee, Blatche, ect will not only help our post defense, but force LD to use Damien, JC2 and Teague more. This will only improve the “energy” and later the team.
I’d rather be a 37 win team that shocks the world than a 53 win team that get’s it’s @$$ kicked every year when it counts.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
7:10 pm
To me it seems that Marvin and Teague are negatively affected by Jamal and Mo getting minutes as “shotmakers”, only problem is they have no real upside for development, nor do they play defense. Why not try to improve? We know what Jamal & Mo can bring. Risk a few wins to see what Teague and JC2 can bring.
Why bring Damien here if we aren’t going to use him?
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
7:14 pm
Does Mo getting fouls b/c he’s undersized at SF or too slow at SG count as D? Dude’s a step slow b/c he hasn’t healed. He’s fighting for a role, for his pride so that he can be valuable to this team. Only problem is he’s undermining the team while failing to exhibit his talent for a trade.
Mo – get healthy and market yourself in Feb when deals will be comign right and left. Get our agent to work a deal. You have no role here. Find a team w/o a good SG and you’ll finally be the man.
PS – take ZaZa with you for the same reasons. He can be the “man” elsewhere too.
Props to LD for rewarding Twin for his hard work, deidication to the team and willingness to play his role!
Rod from College Park
December 28th, 2010
7:24 pm
Thanks Jeje,
Did not know that there was a new blog up.
ryan
December 28th, 2010
7:28 pm
So i hear Jammal Crawford is heading to the D league does this mean he is done with the Hawks now the Hawks can makes some moves with legal limbo is over .
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
7:35 pm
MARVIN IS NO LONGER THE PROBLEM. IF HE COMES OFF THE BENCH WITH ANGER AND INTENSITY, HE WILL BE FINE. OF COURSE THIS WON’T ERASE HIS LAST 5 YEARS OF USELESSNESS, BUT HE IS A GOOD FIT OFF THE BENCH
THE PROBLEM WITH THIS TEAM IS MIKE MINIME BIBBY.
AS KEN SAID, HIS SHOOTING DOES NOT OFFSET HIS EGREGIOUS DEFENSIVE INEFFICIENCIES
GET A NEW STARTING PG LIKE I SAY EVERY DAMN DAY
dell706
December 28th, 2010
7:42 pm
I read on a site about the Wizards trading either Blatche or McGee for what happened with them, think the Hawks can look at trying to get McGee…..would be nice for them!!
ant banks
December 28th, 2010
7:48 pm
teague really has the advantage over bibby and jc1. HE IS YOUNGER. he should spend his entire summer shooting 1,000 shots in the morning, work out, and shoot 1000 shots in the evening. do this for 60 days durin’ 2 summer, by his 4th yr in league, he should be starting. this is dedication. this separates the wheat from the chaff
ant banks
December 28th, 2010
7:50 pm
DELL,
the hawks don’t have the BALLS (pun intended) to pull of the trade to get javalle mcghee in here.
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
8:07 pm
No point getting McGhee with Collins playing this well (he has taken at least 3 charges – what other big on this team can EFFECTIVELY take a charge?)
Get a point guard.
Also, Teague’s 3s haven’t been bad lately
Elliot
December 28th, 2010
8:08 pm
“I agree with Collins now starting, the hawks have a good mix of role players and go to men, but no way Josh should be starting over Marvin..i never seen a former #2 pick having to play second fiddle to just a solid player…”
I will say this, Marvin is probably better at the SF position than Josh is, mostly on the offensive end, and when it comes to defending skilled wing players. However, Josh, overall, has been the superior player for a number of years, and, when his head is in the game, he has a much larger impact on the game than Marvin does. If Marvin is improving and finally starting to make use of his skills, that’s great, but at this point, I don’t think it would be fair to bench Smoove in favor of Marvin.
Additionally, I think Marvin’s style fits in much better with the second unit, which is typically offensively deficient. Marvin is a better offensive player than Josh is, and I really think that his skill set meshes better with the second unit than Josh’s does.
Ramon
December 28th, 2010
9:11 pm
Isaiah Thomas is somewhere laughing at everyone about Wilson Chandler. Isaiah was crazy with contracts, but he was good in the draft.
Scoop
December 28th, 2010
9:18 pm
Confusing post MC. I do not exactly understand what your point is and it always appears that your hedging your stance on coach Drew with your subtle rhetorical questions and what-if scenarios.
My opinion is that coach Drew should be coach of the year and does not get enough credit for the job he is doing. No one talks about what a smart adjustment LD made by inserting Twin into the starting lineup for defensive purposes. The Magic, who CRUSHED us last year, could easily be down three games against us this year(new lineup or not).
The mere fact of questioning Teague’s role is a testament to his improvement this year in producing consistently and some credit has to go to LD and his new offensive system. How about Marvin and the streak of 7-8 games he has put together. There is no question he has benefited from a more balanced offense and is showing what he can do. The difference this year is the adjustments from game to game that LD makes. Teams have been clogging the paint against us forcing perimeter shots but good ball rotation around our post ups of mismatches has led to good open shots.
However, I do feel like the Hawks need to make a trade. I have not looked at the contracts in enough detail, but I think the Hawks should go after Steve Nash. The one guy I feel like has faltered in our motion offense is Jamal Crawford. Maybe it is because he is in a contract year or just needs the ball in his hands to be effective but I do not think his production will be enough. While he is able to create off the dribble, it is for his own shot. A guy like Nash creates in order to facilitate and get open shots for guys which we do not have in Bibby or JC. While Teague posses this ability he can not be relied upon to contribute consistently to win a championship. I would propose something along the lines to Phoenix like: JC’s expiring contract, Zaza-an affordable center still with some potential, and a 1st round pick.
Having Nash’s facilitating and Bibby 3 point shooting would be an unstoppable combination that would put the Hawks in championship contention.
SteveW
December 28th, 2010
9:46 pm
MC – I have been an average sports page reader for over 30 years, way before there were blogs and the internet. And I’m not trying to exagerate, but I don’t think I’ve read a finer article anywhere. This nailed it exactly, and you tactfully but forcefully stated your opinions about LD’s decisions. This was great!
And true. Start Teague, see what happens. I’m a Bibby fan, and he can still get his 18 mpg as an aging PG. Develop Teague, you’ll be glad you did. The guys a freakish athlete. And a good scorer to if you ever saw him in college. All these folks dissing his J don’t know what there talking about.
SteveW
December 28th, 2010
9:51 pm
And as much as I’ve liked Jamal, and in the past Mo’ especially his 1st year here, yipee! They’ll probably be gone this next year, and we can turn JC2 and Teague loose; by necessity. And I’m saying “Yippee” only in 1 sense. Jamal is a fave of mine, and I appreciate his work ethic. And Mo’ saved us after Childress left, then when Marvin got hurt with his back. But it is time to look to the future, with the new CBA and everything. And I think the Hawks will thrive with Teague and JC2>
But I do think LD is not playing for the future, he’s got to win now, or be canned.
PD
December 28th, 2010
10:02 pm
I like this article MC. I have been wondering this Teague thing. Does he have to get 20 assist and 20 points in 18 minutes to get more PT. you figure that one out. He would basically have to pass it to himself and score. Plenty of teams would give so much for a promising young point guard.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
10:25 pm
You said it best Steve W. We do owe Jamal and Mo for what they’ve done for this team. I know Crawford is upset about not being in “future” plans but he’s making that case for himself. This teams future right now is in Teague and hopefully JC2 taking over their slots. Not playing them is definitely playing for now & not later. I’m just afraid the later will be in the playoffs, not next year… much like it was last year when guys like Twin weren’t ready.
Fundamentals
December 28th, 2010
10:28 pm
I’m hoping all this playing time is marketing ZaZa, Mo and Crawford for potential suitors. Right now they don’t seem to be in “future” plans for the team. Bibby was right there with them, but he’s shown he can be of value. If Crawford could prove he’s down with LD’s motion offense and actually play D I’d be down for giving him whatever he wants to stay. As long as he insists on dictating the offense and playing no D he has no place in our future.
JeJe
December 28th, 2010
10:46 pm
Everyone needs to cut it out with this “players getting extra PT so we can trade them.”
No damn trade is happening. We have the most dysfunctional, defiant, and arrogant front office in the league. No one can tell these ignoramuses anything.
No trades are happening so let it go
Ken Sugiura
December 28th, 2010
10:49 pm
great work, Mike.
one thing i’d throw out about Drew’s thinking and where it maybe doesn’t match his actions. he’s waited his whole coaching career for this opportunity and he has to think he’s on a relatively short leash. he knows what he’s going to get from bibby (for better or worse). teague has obvious potential, but isn’t nearly as consistent.
i can see why he wouldn’t be quite as willing to roll the dice night to night with teague and play for the long term as you hope he would. not saying it’s right, just that i understand.
wxwax
December 28th, 2010
10:49 pm
Excellent blog entry!
Thanks for giving such a detailed explanation, Michael. It’s much appreciated.
J from the A
December 28th, 2010
10:50 pm
Interesting trade (no I am not endorsing it):
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=2ctj2k3
May need to throw in a draft pick or two and/or Teague.
Hawks get Camby, Billups, and Harrington. The trade solves the Hawks two biggest problems. Denver goes for it because the trade immediately makes them relevant (assuming they decide to make a run this year w/ Melo; however, even if the move Melo there are other reasons why they might bite on this deal). Portland goes for it because they need to blow up the team and immediately start rebuilding.
It ends up being a blockbuster high-risk/high-reward trade that could possibly push the Hawks into contender status (or it could completely blow up in their faces, depending on how the new players accumulate to the Hawks).
J from the A
December 28th, 2010
10:50 pm
Oh, and great info MC. Thanks for putting in the work!
prison mike
December 28th, 2010
10:52 pm
Teague is gaining confidence and thus his play has elevated. But when bibby eventually gets away from his recent struggles and jamal starts to get hot there will be more dnps for jt. Once he learns how to absorb contact in the paint and stop relying on the floater so much he will be a good player for the hawks.
In reality bibby only has 1.5 years left as a hawk so it’s time to start amping up teague’s development.
Ray
December 28th, 2010
11:03 pm
At this rate I don’t know what to make of what’s going on with JC2 or Jamal Crawford 2.0.
From what I saw since he was drafted the guy was better than the D-League you don’t ever seen a player to the D-league to find minutes he goes to get developed, but what development does he need that’s not just playing on the court to get more experience.
As far as the three players that are not in our future they should already have their bags packed up if you ask me especially two of them Zaza, and Mo neither have been playing great B-ball lately since like 2 years ago which is sad.
O'Brien
December 28th, 2010
11:16 pm
Bibby can only get worse, and Teague can only get better. If LD keeps this up, Bibby’s contract will be in its final year, and we still dont know what Teague can do.
And guys should not give up on Teague either. Mike Conley was picked 4th, and he did not start playing well until his third or fourth year.
I know Teague’s situation is difficult because he is on a potential 50 win team, but I think Teague has the potential to be at least a solid backup PG.
I have been disappointed in LD with the development. Mo Evans and Jamal are in their final year, which means they could be gone. So what will LD do next year?
Grandad
December 28th, 2010
11:45 pm
I have been reading newspaper articles for over 50 years.
Today’s article was one of them.
Samuel
December 28th, 2010
11:49 pm
JC2 is the best rookie we’ve had here since Al Horford. LD is much worse than Woody by not playing JC2. Dude is a baller. Huge mistake.
Ken Strickland
December 28th, 2010
11:50 pm
I don’t understand how LDrew can make lineup changes to create or eliminate advantages or disadvantages @ center, yet refuses to address, or even consider, making changes to create or eliminate advantages or disadvantages at PG.
Just like Woodson did, LDrew is focusing on what he feels Teague doesn’t do well, while trivializing the teams need for what he does do well. On the other hand, he seems to believe Bibby’s 3pt shooting is important enough to compensate for, and trivalize, his inconsistency, limitations, and lack of speed, quickness, penetrating ability and DEF.
With all of that said, the possibility that Bibby, Jamal and MEvans are being showcased as trade bait can’t be ignored. This might also be the motivation behind the sudden decision to send both Pape Sy and JoCrawford to the D-League. The idea might be to get them in gm condition and ready, as a prelude to an upcoming trade.
The team did a very good job with both JJ and Jamal out with injuries. So, if the team can win without both players, it can certainly win without Jamal alone. While I have nothing more than speculation to go on, I feel we’ll see both MEvans, Jamal, and maybe Zaza, traded by the deadline.
With Jamal gone, we’ll have to bring in another PG. I don’t think Bibby will be traded, because his clutch shooting and vet savy seems to be highly prized by Drew, and rightfully so. He just needs to be brought off the bench, and/or have his mins reduced in favor of Teague.
JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION.
Michael Cunningham
December 29th, 2010
12:48 am
@Scoop: “Confusing post MC. I do not exactly understand what your point is and it always appears that your hedging your stance on coach Drew with your subtle rhetorical questions and what-if scenarios.”
not sure what yo mean here. i do try to be fair, though, so if that’s what you call hedging, then so be it.
“The mere fact of questioning Teague’s role is a testament to his improvement this year in producing consistently and some credit has to go to LD and his new offensive system. How about Marvin and the streak of 7-8 games he has put together. There is no question he has benefited from a more balanced offense and is showing what he can do.”
if this is true and he’s producing consistently, then why doesn’t he play consistent minutes? i’ve tried to give L.D. a chance to explain and when he does his answers seem to be inconsistent.
i do think Marvin has benefited from the new offense and have said as much before.
Rev in Tampa
December 29th, 2010
12:59 am
Grandad,
I’ve got to inquire as to the meaning of your 11:45pm post. Just want to understand better what you are saying.
Are you saying that this particular blogpost by MC was just another run of the mill article. Or are you saying that this blogpost stood in the line of great investigative, hard-hitting, journalism of 50 years ago that has largely been forgotten by the drivel we typically read in the once august NYT, WP, & AJC?
I would be of the second opinion. In fact, in MC’s posting I even noted ‘passion’.
Scoop
December 29th, 2010
1:00 am
Let me be clear-nearly all of your posts are very well written and informative. However, I take issue with the substance part involving LD mainly because I feel he does not get enough praise from the media in general.
On the point of Teague’s production, while up to this point he has given production beyond what was expected given his role, but I believed I said that I would not rely on that or believe that to expand given extra playing time when the Hawks are determined to win the East and make it to the championship(which I think they will do). That is why I believe we can use the available money that would have gone to Shaq to make a deal only for Nash. I do not think this team needs much except a little more benefit from the whistle and beyond Nash’s passing ability, I think that he would help here too. However, I do not think we should make a deal for the only purpose of just making one.
MC, you spoke of how poor the Hawks p&r defense was, which I believe would be partially solved with giving Mo Evans more pt. His greatest value is his perimeter quickness and I believe he should play more SG and move JJ to the three more when we are playing smaller lineups with quick guards like tomorrow with Golden State.
To be honest, this is the only sports blog I post on and that is mainly because the content you provide is interesting and in depth.
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
1:05 am
The Spurs just beat the Lakers by 15 and Duncan+Manu combined for 11 points.
For us tot beat the Lakers, at home or on the road, we need 3 guys to have career nights
Scoop
December 29th, 2010
1:07 am
The Bucks crushed the Lakers
We crushed the Bucks……..
Nuff Said
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
1:09 am
THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE A TRADE.
WE ARE NOT SHOWCASING ANYONE. LARRY DREW IS AN INCONSISTENT AVERAGE/MEDIOCRE COACH WHO REFUSES TO PLAY DAMIEN AND TEAGUE
FOR EXAMPLE, DAMIEN SHUT DOWN LBJ IN THE MIAMI GAME, BUT DIDN’T EVEN GET BACK IN IN THE 4TH. THE NEXT TIME WE PLAY MIAMI, WE’LL SEE MO EVANS (WHO IS NOT EVEN 6″5 AS LISTED) ON LBJ
LOL
Scoop
December 29th, 2010
1:15 am
@JeJe
-um no we will not see Mo on king james because Joe is healthy………….
….Nuff Said
O'Brien
December 29th, 2010
1:47 am
Well said Ken S. For every 3 points Bibby scores, he gives up 2, so I dont think his offense is enough to offset his defense.
And the reason why LD needs to give Teague minutes now, is because if we play Jameer Nelson, Rondo, Derrick Rose in the playoffs, Bibby and the Hawks will be pick and rolled to death.
Teague needs to take his lumps from now, so he will be ready for the playoffs.
Hawk n the Ham
December 29th, 2010
2:03 am
If the Hawks are suppose to be a “Defense First” team, why isn’t the starting rotation:
1 Teague
2 Johnson
3 Smoove
4 Horford
5 Collins
Would this not be the ideal lineup for solid defense and easy transition buckets?
cowbulls
December 29th, 2010
2:21 am
The biggest difference is Bibby is getting older and worse every day. The Hawks also should limit his playing time to save him for the playoffs. Teague can only get better with playing time. At the very least, the Hawks need to find out if they have to draft another PG next year or can take a true center.
MsDee
December 29th, 2010
2:24 am
Is it me, or is anybody else looking forward to seeing how well Pape Sy does with the Utah Flash?
northcyde
December 29th, 2010
2:29 am
What an excellent blog by MC.
Thorough . . concise . . highly informative . . just an excellent piece of analysis.
I noticed back in November that Drew had a tendency to make an offensive adjustment when the team was struggling, than a defensive one. And the player early on that was benefitting from it, was Josh Powell. If Powell made a few shots, Drew would stick with that dude . . even at the expense of leaving Al or Josh on the bench.
Bibby, I believe, is still at #1 . . when it comes to +/- ratio for the Hawks ( I need to check that ). The team does play better offensively when he’s in the game ( on most nights ).
But MC definitely makes the right points. If Drew admits to using “Woody coaching moves” with his hiding of Bibby and “other players” ( mainly Jamal and Horford ), why isn’t Teague being given a chance to slow people down?
Especially now, since the guy is playing decent off the bench?
To give Teague a chance to impact a game, both Bibby AND Jamal’s minutes are going to have to be trimmed.
But when the Hawks are down in a game, Drew is always going to opt to play the offensive minded players, instead of inserting a defensive one
darrell starks
December 29th, 2010
2:48 am
MC great post by my man RUFUS he said the celtics win because of rondo and perkins who’s defense out way there non off. skills, very well put with collins starting at center and teague at point the defense intensity will raise 2 another level and make the hawks contenders not pretenders.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!
Scoop
December 29th, 2010
2:50 am
I hear all the good points about Teague, but the fact is the Hawks guard rotation is too deep and talented and there just is not consistent minutes. While he may posses the talent to potentially shore up one of our weaknesses that still does not justify a reduction in Bibby or JC’s minutes. While both lack the lateral foot speed the loss offensively would be too great. Plus, JJ ends up on the best offensive player anyway. If anything I would want more pt for Mo.
darrell starks
December 29th, 2010
2:52 am
Teague have shown flashes on defense, and kind of remind me of eddie johnson back in the day with the hawks.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
December 29th, 2010
3:03 am
Scoop my opinion is that teague starting make the hawks better, you must have guys playing a certain role not always offensive skills, bibby defense doesn’t make up for his offense, that’s why guys like NATE ROBINSON, DEVIN HARRIS, AND OTHER POINT GUARDS HAVE CAREER GAMES AGAINST THE HAWKS BECAUSE OF BIBBY STARTING.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
December 29th, 2010
3:07 am
STARTER TEAGUE, JOE, JOSH, HORFORD, COLLINS
BENCH BIBBY, JAMAL, MARVIN, POWELL, ZAZA
RESERVE MOE, DAMIEN
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
December 29th, 2010
3:20 am
MC except lebron james what nba player can guard josh at the 3 in the post? NO BODY IF LD RECOGNIZE THAT JOSH SHOULD AVG AT LEAST 20POINTS A GAME.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!
Miles D
December 29th, 2010
4:01 am
NOW WE TALKIN MC!! I am TIRED of LD saying that he is trying to put his stamp on the team starting with the defensive end but not giving our best defensive players more time in favor of just “shotmakers”! After all, defense turns into “great” offense with steals and fast-break points! It creates easier baskets and momentum (or breaks it for opposing teams) for those times when the offense is stagnant! Gerald Wilkens did a GREAT job on Lebron but rarely hits the floor!! LD has to come to understand that those type of players that make those type of plays can “CHANGE THE CULTURE” of our team and provide us with a real identity! But you know..maybe he does but politics get in the way of the game too! But if he were really smart he would learn how to be more flexible in his approach and mix and match his personnel according to their assets! Put Teague at the point sometimes.. move Bib to the 2, JJ to the 3, Josh at the 4, and Al at the 5 and run the other teams ass off the court! Cause with Teague’s defense and quickness he could get easy baskets or more wide open shots for guys and THAT would make us roll!! He could also, learn to use guys to dictate the pace of the game and when we slow the game down or what not! But really he needs to show our young guys that he has confidence in them to get the job done, and not just hold them hostage til somebody gets hurt, AND to stick to his guns! STOP COMPROMISING WITH GUYS! IF THEY KEEP TAKING ILL-ADVISED SHOTS, MAKING BAD TURNOVERS! SIT ‘EM!! And don’t be afraid to think outside the box “be water”! LOL! LET’S GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MsDee
December 29th, 2010
5:56 am
Again I say, LD MUST BE under locks with Sund with playing Jamal 30+ min over Teague and Mo Evans over D. Wilkins due to trading options cause there is no way, AND I MEAN NO WAY, u give Teague AND Wilkins a DNP against New Orleans when New Orleans arent THAT GOOD!! They lost BIG TIME against the TIMERWOLVES!!! WHAT??? There is NO excuses to not be playing Teague more this season, NO FREAKIN WAY!!
MsDee
December 29th, 2010
6:00 am
Just listen how LD over looks MC’s concerns when it comes to Teague! He can’t give the CORRECT explanation as to why Teague isnt getting is just dues in more playing time. Sunds has LD hands tied right now until the trading deadline has passed. And I guess Teague understands the situation as well since he doesnt seem to ‘upset’ that he got a DNP the other game. He basically saids, “as long as we are winning, I’m fine”
MsDee
December 29th, 2010
6:01 am
Teague basically saids, “as long as we are winning, I’m fine”..YEAH RIGHT, TEAGUE!!
chris
December 29th, 2010
7:02 am
“his decisions in this matter reflect a different tact.”
FYI – It should be different “tack”, meaning direction. It comes from the sailing term to tack back and forth.
dap01
December 29th, 2010
8:13 am
MC: Thanks for a great blog. I appreciate you asking those questions.
If Teague and Bibby played exactly the same minutes each game, who would have the better stats?
The Hawks can only get better if they improve the perimeter defense. Bibby is a great guy but he is the worst on ball defender in the LEAGUE.
If we go with Teague there is a chance that he takes us further. If we stay with Bibby, there is not much hope for improvement.
dap01
December 29th, 2010
8:15 am
If LD keeps trying the same things that got Woody fired, his stock will continue to drop.
Mike is back
December 29th, 2010
8:21 am
MC, U DEFINITLY GOT SOME MIKE IN YA BRO, cuz u been bringing it of late…YOU AND BIG RAY…are in playoff form RIGHT NOW…please talk to LD and ask him to pleeeeeeeeeeeease…GET MY HAWKS…the same way. lol
I wrote a master piece last night…BM must have got me again…o well…gotta say somin.
LET’S GO LD…it time to back up some this exotic fancy state of art offense stuff…you were pushing at the start of the season…all we were hearing about was your desire to get more out Collins and Teague…now that they have step their game up…WHAT’YA GONNA DUE…hey that’s a song…ooosp!!
Anyway…did I tell everyone how please I was with the motion offense LD has implemented. LOL…LET’S GO HAWKS…IT TIME TO PICK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!
Westurd
December 29th, 2010
8:29 am
Hawks fans are willing to take whatever bumps we might hit if we give Teague the burn he needs. WE UNDERSTAND the long term impact this will have on the team…..why can’t LD or the ASG.
STRETCH
December 29th, 2010
8:45 am
With productive big men at a premium, several clubs are interested in Camby’s services. He’s still averaging 11 rebounds and 1.8 blocks a game, which would provide a huge boost to any contender. While acquiring Camby is probably a long shot, Orlando is one team I’m told has interest. ESPN.com
The Rockets, looking to use Yao Ming’s $17.7 million expiring contract to add a potential star or two to its roster, recently called Sacramento and offered the 7-foot-6 center for Samuel Dalembert and DeMarcus Cousins. The Kings had no interest, and are definitely not trading Cousins anywhere, according to sources. ESPN.com
Denver is trying to put Al Harrington and his five-year, $33 million deal into any trade it makes for Anthony. ESPN.com
Portland is as active on the trade market as any club, with Andre Miller’s name being mentioned regularly. But while it’d like to make a change, the uncertainty about Brandon Roy’s health and future has left the Blazers a bit unsure of what, exactly, they’d like to do. ESPN.com
And what are your Atlanta Hawks doing? Forgot…Sund is waiting for the “core” to gell. What a sorry organization!
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
8:58 am
Thanks for that journey into LD’s mind MC. Even casual fans must wonder what LD’s thinking when he doesn’t use Teague on quick guards and against great pick and roll teams.
vava74
December 29th, 2010
9:11 am
A small curious look into a guy we all know and “love”
:
#32 Morris, Randolph G7 MPG 37.4 FG51.1% 3p% 0.0% FT% 72.5% OReb 3.6 DReb 9.0 RPG 12.6 APG 3.0 FPG 4.6 SPG 1.9 BPG 1.7 TO 3.6 PPG 33.3
Chinese League Stats!
Will everyone “believe” that Morris will be back in the league after posting these numbers as they did last year after having sight of Siler’s?
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
9:12 am
The Wizards might be asking around, but I seriously doubt they pull the trigger on a McGee trade, especilly not McGee who’s still producing a rookie scale salary.
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
9:13 am
producing on a rookie scale salary*
Fresh
December 29th, 2010
9:14 am
1. Bench Bibby +
2. Trade Jamal +
3. Start Teague
Ending Result = The Hawks become a better team.
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
9:15 am
Ken Strickland,
Another fact proving the NBA sucks this year is that so many teams are going on massive winning streaks.
You look at Miami’s schedule and you think they’ll lose maybe 6 more games this year because the NBA blows
vava74
December 29th, 2010
9:16 am
On Teague:
I think he will do well in the future and I believe that LD has failed to increment his usage in some games where he would certainly help.
One of the things I notice in his game and that I like a lot (that passes unnoticed) is that almost every single pass he makes to an open man is perfectly directed to the optimum “catch to shoot” location.
Almost every single pass.
You should look into this during the next games.
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
9:18 am
I look at Miami’s schedule and it looks like we have wayyyy more back-to-backs than they do
FIRE SUND
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
9:21 am
vava74,
Idk, from what I hear over-the-hill or vet minimum NBA player can head over there and average Jordanesque stats (not you Steve Francis, sorry buddy).
But good for Randolph! He’s probably like Dwight Howard over there.
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
9:27 am
I would trade Jamal Crawford for Marcus Camby straight up.
Marvin comes off the bench, Jordan Crawford becomes back up shooting guard, and Teague gets more minutes, making the Hawks a much better defensive team.
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
9:30 am
I just hate that Camby’s so injury prone. Makes me sad.
drmaryb (*_*)
December 29th, 2010
9:33 am
Daniel said this:
” I mean why not just get Tony Parker for Jeff Teague ”
Why would San Antone trade Parker for Teague, when The Spurs have the best record in the NBA and are set to make this final Championship Run with that veteran roster?
Where is Daniel’s logic? Why would any GM do that? This stuff has to make sense or you lose credibility fast. We need a PG? What can we do to get one and is Sund looking to upgrade anything at all?
Big Ray
December 29th, 2010
9:40 am
Hilarious.
No matter what Larry Drew does, he will be compared to the guy he used to work for.
If he’s a liar, he learned it from Woody.
If he is in love with the shot-making tandem of backcourt players, he learned it from Woody.
If you’re going to blame him for acting like Woody, then give Woody the credit for being that influential. I mean, who else could Drew have learned from, huh? Either that, or judge the man on his own merits. But I know better than to expect something like that. It’s only too convenient to hate on the closest target, especially if you were in love with Woody to begin with.
Funny how people are all over Drew for having to deal with the same problems that were here when Woody was here. Yep, the same PERSONNEL problems. Yet, there have been differences on both offense and defense.
Ah, but here is the difference: the switching defense was a scheme that the Hawks relied on all the time to hide the defensive issues that Bibby and Crawford create. Instead of doing that, Drew leaves these guys exposed and says they gotta live with defending their own men. The result is not having Horford and Smith out defending on the perimeter.
Big Ray
December 29th, 2010
9:41 am
drmaryb ,
Daniel is just being a smart-a$$. He does that sometimes….it’s entertaining and therapeutic…
Ry
December 29th, 2010
9:41 am
This was written in an article by MC:
“In what has become an ongoing dialogue this season, Drew chatted with forward Josh Smith about his shot selection on Monday. According to Hoopdata.com, in the past six games entering Monday, Smith had missed 27 of 33 shots from beyond 15 feet.”
Is Smith just stupid or is he defiant? Either way, it is not good. This has been ongoing for the past couple of years.
Hawks Fan
December 29th, 2010
9:42 am
Why can’t we get a coach that can develop talent. It’s pretty obvious Woodson or Drew can’t. Bibby should get 15 minutes a game maximum. Play JC2 and Teague as many minutes as possible or we’ll never know what they can do. The few games I’ve watched this year Teague really looks improved. The offense and defense intensity picks up. Josh, Marvin and Joe seem to play better. Stop the foolishness and get a coach in here.
vava74
December 29th, 2010
9:43 am
i_am_soulstar,
I am perfectly aware of the fact that stats on the Chinese League are what they are.
I was taking a blow at the people who thought that Siler was anything more than a huge body.
Randolph has terrific basketball fundamentals (post moves) and a size which allow him to dominate on a league like the Chinese.
Nonetheless, I actually believe that if Randolph had the desire (which he apparently does not) an experience like this one could allow him to get his game back and still be a productive player.
Siler does not have the fundamentals, only the desire, so I believe that he will quickly be out of the league again.
If they could switch portions of their brains (or feed RandMo with some seriously wicked amphetamines) the result would be a heck of a player.
drmaryb (*_*)
December 29th, 2010
9:43 am
Najeh, I and many other bloggers on here pushed for perimeter defenders all Summer long:
Tony Allen
Matt Barnes
Raja Bell
Damian Wilkens
Were ALL available and sorely needed. What did Sund do?
Nothing! Blame it on the Sund-Shine don’t Blame it on the Boogie!
We have the same ole perimeter defense issues we had since Mookie retired, that was what? 2 Owners ago and now 16 years.
This team went from 13 wins to 53 wins and hadn’t made the playoffs in 13 years until Joe ands his Boys came together 3 years ago. We have been to 3 straight playoffs with this core, but we are stagnant in the 2nd Round, actually worse in Tound 2 as of last season in record setting 101 pts fashion.
We need to UPGRADE to move forward, with all the Eastern Teams getting better?
We have stuck our heads up our ASKG Azzes and are reporting old news as though it is Breaking News!
Either play Teague and have growing pains or get us a damned PG!
We could have had Raymond Felton! I know Charlotte wish they had kept him!
We don’t need a world beater – We just need a “Change We Can Believe In!”
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
9:49 am
When’s the last time Bibby did a fancy move: cross over another point guard, did a step back jumper, executed a fast break?
He is good for hitting contested shots and playing shoddy defense
START TEAGUE
northcyde
December 29th, 2010
9:49 am
The one thing in Bibby’s ( and LD’s favor ), is this important fact. The Hawks simply play better basketball with Mike Bibby on the floor, even with his defensive issues.
HONESTLY . . when you look at Teague’s “opponent counterpart production per 48 minutes” stats ( on 82games.com ), it indicates that Teague ( for the season ) has been getting lit up by the opposing PG.
That may or may not be true the past few weeks. But overall this season, the opposing PG has thrived while Teague was in the game.
But the only thing we as fans haven’t seen yet, is if Teague, playing with JJ, Marvin, Smith and Horford in the lineup at the same time, can be a better unit, than with Bibby running with those guys.
It’s just that Bibby has a gaudy +/- rating of over +100, and that’s easily the best on the team. That’s extremely hard to dismiss, no matter how horrible Bibby is on defense.
Big Ray
December 29th, 2010
9:53 am
Now I wonder if some people are noticing these things:
1) Mike Bibby is playing better on both offense and defense this season. Last season, we all thought he had one foot in the proverbial grave. But the truth is, the guy is better on both ends of the floor. On the defensive end, he hasn’t gotten any faster, and he won’t. But his effort has been a lot better than it was under Woody. Say what you want about that, but I’m sure that I’m not the only one who has seen it.
2) Drew can talk about getting Bibby to be better on defense, but it’s not realistic from a physical standpoint. He can’t/won’t get better. But Teague on the other hand, can get better at everything, even on offense.
3) I have to say that I’m not happy with Drew where Teague is concerned. Teague justified the spare minutes earlier in the season. He has, however, justified more playing time in the last several games, and Drew has still gone with other options.
4) Part of the issue with Drew’s decisions is this… and a lot of people have forgotten about this – Drew is expected to bring this team to greater heights (i.e., more wins), with damn near the exact same personnel . There are no excuses for some of his decisions, but you better believe that a part of this is the expectation that he can at least maintain last year’s win total and record position. Yep, management placed all the pressure on him, and none of it on themselves. Ba$tard$.
And you know this is true. How many times have you see the quotes where ownership/management keeps yapping about “we like our core”, “we’re going to wait and see what this group does”, “we’re patient, we gotta let these guys grow” and all that other BS?
5) Horford has improved under Drew. Pachulia has been exposed. Collins has improved under Drew.
6) Any point guard woes can be attributed to a single move in Hawks history. “With the 2nd pick of the 2005 NBA draft, the Atlanta Hawks select…”
We missed two things with that pick, and we still are missing those two things: A TRUE TEAM LEADER and A TOP FLIGHT STARTING POINT GUARD FOR THE NEXT 5-10 YEARS.
Not very often do you get a solid starting point guard who can take the job in the first or second year, if you are picking outside the lottery, or below the first 15 or 16 picks, even in a guard-heavy draft. Exceptions like Rajon Rondo exist, but there are few such exceptions. Teague was the 7th guy picked, that ain’t a first or second year starter. Even the higher picks tend to struggle.
But when you ignore two obvious stars so you can add another guy that you hope will turn into Glenn Robinson, you screw yourself. That’s what we did, and we’ve been paying for it ever since, trying to mix and match different guys like Bibby, Lue, AJ, Jamal (off the bench), Ivey, Teague, and others ever since. And there ain’t no hope in sight.
Even a high pick and talent like Mike Conley hasn’t come on strong until his 4th year.
drmaryb (*_*)
December 29th, 2010
10:02 am
Game Manager!
Aye Najeh! Do you think Matty-Ice managed that game well enough to win?
McClure fumbled the hand-off and Turner fumbled at the 1 yard line, both errors lead to 14 pts. Matty- Ice threw NO picks unlike Brees with 2 and one for a TD.
Falcons Defense was stout @ 17 pts allowed and stopped the run against the reigning Champs, (whose Defense stopped our run and pass plays). We should have gone for it @ 4th Down & 6, we been converting 4th Downs all year, esp. With 2:37 mins left to win it.
So, do you think Falcons are still Super Bowl Contenders? I do.
____________________
Sorry folks, back to the Hawks: I see parallels with both franchises when it comes to 4th Qrtr Coaching decisions. We are losing winnable games in the 4th Qrtrs. Falcons are a lot closer than the Hawks, But the Hawks need to upgrade talent badly! Thomas got rid of MeAngelo Hall (a nice talent) to improve team chemistry and attitude. So what will Sund do?
Anything?
Big Ray
December 29th, 2010
10:04 am
Northcyde ,
No way is Teague nearly as good with the starting unit as Bibby is. No way. And not for another year or two, if we look at his total curve of growth.
I can certainly understand where you’re coming from with those stats that suggest Teague’s counterparts have been lighting him up. I think there is more detail here. Teague defends pretty well as long as he doesn’t come up against a hard screen. But it’s not so much that he gets beaten on defense as it is that with the exception of the bulk of the last several games, Teague wasn’t scoring worth a crap.
So, in effect, a guy could shoot 3-9 against Teague and score only 6 or 7 points. But when Teague isn’t scoring at all, or is only putting up 2 points (happened way too often), it’s gonna look bad. His defense certainly isn’t perfect (but can be pretty dang good), but his offense has been flat out disgusting early on.
Also, I haven’t been on Bibby for his defense. I have watched him this season, and there is no doubt in my mind that he has been better, despite the lack of switching to hide his physical limitations. Dude has simply given more effort and gotten into passing lanes more, and even defended decently when he’s been posted up.
The problem is what is has been, and what many are blind to because they are dazzled by his dribble: JAMAL CRAWFORD.
Not only is the effort rarely there, but when it comes, it is in mere spurts, and when his shot is off, he kills us on both ends. Literally KILLS us. When his shot is on, and the opposition isn’t playing well, nobody notices the missed assignments, the half-a$$ed efforts, and the lost looking approach.
Back to the original subject….Teague isn’t close to being somebody who can put Bibby on the bench for more minutes. He’s earned his 18 mpg game recently, but the trend must continue. Bibby is still better until Teague can score more efficiently and consistently, and from outside. And, Bibby is still a better passer and ball handler. Teague has to learn to play under control all the time, the though team as a whole is turning the ball over like crazy some nights.
Big test against Golden State tonight. Their guards are superior to ours…and that’s a fact.
Still can’t believe we took Salim Stoudamire over Monta Ellis back in ‘05. Man, we messed that draft all the way up….
Maurice
December 29th, 2010
10:14 am
So why did we get rid of Woody?
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
10:14 am
FIRE RICK SUND
ASG SELL THE TEAMS PLEASE
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
10:15 am
HAS LD ASKED FOR NEW PLAYERS?
HE, AS DOES EVERYONE ELSE, RECOGNIZES OUR PGS ARE BOTH ONE DIMENSIONAL
GET A NEW PG
LOWRY UDRIH ELLIS
Ken Strickland
December 29th, 2010
10:17 am
I don’t understand this love affair both MWoodson and LDrew have with Bibby. They both seem willing to weaken the teams overall DEF, and create difficulties for other players, by employing gimmicks to try and compensate for his liabilities. It’s not like he’s a prolific scoring PG, hell, he’s not even consistent.
Since when did we come to rely so heavily on 3pt shooting that we feel compelled to continue starting Bibby, and compensating for his many limitations? HOW CAN ANY TEAM EXPECT TO IMPROVE AND PROGRESS IF IT’S HC INSISTS ON DEPENDING ON THE NBA’S MOST LIMITED, AND ONE OF ITS LEAST PRODUCTIVE STARTING PG, WHO’S ALSO A TOTAL DEF LIABILITY?
How in the devil can any HC actually believe Bibby can provide us with a matchup advantage against anyone? In the NBA, it’s been established that PG is THE most important position in basketball, and a chain(team) is no stronger than its weakest link. Bibby is our weakest link, and for some unknown reason, both Woodson and Drew have found it necessary to protect, maintain and depend on our weakest link.
After playing only one third of the season, LDrew has already acknowledged Bibby has started to show signs of wearing down. We’re definitely not seeing the energy we saw from him at the start of the season. However, we are starting to see the same poor DEF effort and OFF inconsistencies that plagued him all of last yr. Instead of LDrew making adjustments or changes at PG, he’s decided to do what Woodson did, and that’s resort to DEF gimmicks to try and mask the obvious.
A lot of Bibby fans cling to the idea that he makes a lot of clutch shots, and they’re correct. But, this reminds me of the fued between John Elway and Dan Reeves, and a question he responded to about HC Dan Reeves after he was fired. The interviewer reminded Elway that it was under Dan Reeves that he became the NFL’s all time leader in come from behind victories.
Elway responded by saying Dan Reeves’ decision making, conversative approach, and play calling, is what put the team in most of those come from behind situations in the 1st place. So, with that said, maybe if we made a change or major adjustment at PG, we wouldn’t end up in so many situations where Bibby has to rescue us with his clutch 3pt shooting.
The Hawks certainly have more than enough OFF weapons to allow us to rely more on the speed, quickness penetrating ability and superior DEF of JTeague, rather than the 3pt shooting and atrocious DEF of MBibby, along with his other liabilities.
northcyde
December 29th, 2010
10:34 am
You’re preaching to the Choir on the Jamal Crawford issue. The dude can ball, but the minute he shows ineffectiveness, you have to pull him.
With him, even if he’s playing well on offense, you can’t let him miss more than 4 shots in a row, before taking him out. And like with Powell, you have to keep a close eye on if his effort on the defensive end, is actually more of a detriment than his offensive production.
Playing him at the point has been a disaster, and it’s not a coincidence that when LD decides to bypass Teague in favor of Jamal at the point, that the team usually struggles.
One of our worst lineups this year, is the Jamal – JJ – Marvin – Smith – Horford lineup.
At some point, LD is going to have to give Teague COMPLETE CONTROL of the 2nd unit, and have Jamal play more off the ball. He can still be aggressive when he gets it, but Teague needs control of the offense, to see if the 2nd unit can be more efficient.
When Jamal has control, like you said, it’s “And-1 Tricky Dribble to Get His Own Shot” time. Might as well call Jamal “Hot Sauce”.
Jamal should play somewhere around 25 minutes a game. If he has it going, and he’s not giving points back on the defensive end, you can afford to play him more minutes.
But if he doesn’t have it going, you can’t play him extended minutes.
northcyde
December 29th, 2010
10:38 am
My comment before the last one I posted is “under moderation”, because I had 2 hyperlinks in it. It answers Mr. Strickland’s last question on why Woody and LD seem to be “in love” with Bibby.
Can the rest of the blog see that post on why I think LD plays Bibby? If not, could Big Ray or MC rescue the post?
ignition
December 29th, 2010
10:39 am
Awesome blog… Hold LD’s feet to the fire its about accountability…
Our perimeter defense is awful and yet our best defender is hardly on the floor getting his reps in and building his confidence.. We have more than enough scoring options it’s time to get the defense down pat.. I don’t care if Bibby ever sees the floor if he can’t guard anyone..
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
10:46 am
If that ending lineup with Jamal with PG is so bad, why do we use it EVERY game?
Geemack
December 29th, 2010
10:47 am
Ken Strickland,
Excellent post,
The entire city see the benefits JT bring to our most glaring weakness…Defense.
Hopefully the coaches will see it before it’s to late.
He would also help with getting the Hawks more fast break opportunities.
I don’t understand why we walk the ball up some much on offense.
J from the A
December 29th, 2010
11:01 am
northcyde 9:49am post — people should read it.
At the beginning of the season, Teague struggled defensively, _completely_ losing his man way too often. Where Teague might have had the abilities to be the better defender, he simply lacked the fundamentals to be _any_ better than Bibby. [Trade speed for fundamentals, and the result is still bad defense.] Of course, everyone saw/remembered what they wanted to see/remember. They forgot the times Teague got broken down by a weak crossover move, but remembered Bibby being a step behind his man.
[By the way, Bibby has improved his defensive intensity this year. He is really fighting. Nonetheless, "fast don't lie." Bibby simply cannot keep up with many of the younger, faster PGs.]
However, Teague has looked better both offensively and defensively over the last few games, so I am willing to _tentatively_ see him as becoming a better defensive player than Bibby. [Yes, I meant exactly what I said.]
Take off the rose-tinted glasses when viewing Teague. Take of the cloud-lined glasses when viewing Bibby. Then, you just may have some of the answers you are looking for.
Now with all that said, I am all for Teague getting more playing time in spite of the fact that he is not yet a better ball player [perhaps not even a better defender] than those in front of him in the rotation. He has progressed noticeably this season. If Teague is “ready” by playoff times, this Hawks team may be a real[/at least a minor] threat.
northcyde
December 29th, 2010
11:03 am
Ken . . if what you say is true, why does Bibby lead the team in +/- ratio? Your conclusion is that Bibby’s lack of offense and poor defense is the reason why Bibby is in position to make “clutch” shots.
But almost every lineup Bibby is in, he posts a positive number, despite his defense.
Drew, like the previous coach, is reluctant to give Teague full control, because Teague does make careless mistakes at times. And like the previous coach, Drew trusts his vets more than the younger players.
Teague will really have to play almost “lights out” for Drew to have complete trust in him . . . or see Bibby fall off like he did in the 2nd half of last season, which may force him to play Teague ( even though his tendency has been to play Jamal more ).
Rufus1
December 29th, 2010
11:04 am
Great article by Bret LaGree
http://nba-point-forward.si.com/2010/12/28/average-hawks-in-need-of-financial-creativity/
He touches on the Jamal, Bibby and Joe on the floor at the sametime….They are down 4.9pts a game.
J from the A
December 29th, 2010
11:05 am
@northcyde 10:38: the awaiting moderation comment does not show to the rest of us … it probably never will. [I had a couple of those under moderation comments a bit back, and they never were cleared.] You might want to re-post the original post into two separate posts???
It was not a bad pick
December 29th, 2010
11:06 am
Big Ray
“Still can’t believe we took Salim Stoudamire over Monta Ellis back in ‘05. Man, we messed that draft all the way up”….
Both of the players took in the 2005 draft were never given an oppurtunity to showcase any skills…Salim should still be playing for the Hawks..The kid could shoot,drive, and flat out score..Woody ruined Salim.the worst move Bk made was hiring Woodson.Bk gave Woodson a deep talented roster,Woody went with old Journeymen Lue,Flip,Mo,A johnson…Marvin over Paul and DWill were not a terrible pick…for these reasons
1.Neither Paul or DWill have won anything..Not like you passed on Jordan
2.On draft night Bilas said 5 or 6 years down the road Marvin might be the best of the whole draft..Now, if Drew would let Marvin be the 2nd option, Marvin will score 20 a night easily, Woody and Drew love for joe Max to have the ball all game…Then when Jamal comes in at the pg, even though he is a sg, he have the ball all game…
give Doc Rivers this team, he would have contended for a title
c Pachullia/Morris,Solo
pf Al,josh,diaw,solo
sf Marvin,diaw,josh
sg Joe,childress,salim
pg bibby,law,salim
Rufus1
December 29th, 2010
11:09 am
@Northcyde
I don’t have a problem with Bibby as much as I have a problem with Bibby and Jamal playing together in the 4th QT…Or Bibby having to guard Tony Parker in the 4th QT
vava74
December 29th, 2010
11:11 am
Big Ray:
“The problem is what is has been, and what many are blind to because they are dazzled by his dribble: JAMAL CRAWFORD.”
northcyde:
“Jamal should play somewhere around 25 minutes a game. If he has it going, and he’s not giving points back on the defensive end, you can afford to play him more minutes.”
Ummm… there was a blogger repeating ad nauseam precisely these thoughts last year and this past summer…
Ummm, I wonder who it was….
If I am not wrong, that same blogger also said that the team actually got worse with the change between Flip and Jamal… precisely due to these two factors (inferior D and too many minutes on the floor)
J from the A
December 29th, 2010
11:12 am
@Rufus1: LaGree lost his credibility IMO when he claimed that JJ is a defensive liability [he said all three of the Hawks primary guards are _individually_ defensive liabilities] and, in the same sentence, claimed that the Hawks’ three primary guards’ offense is on decline. [Is Bibby's shooting really on decline? Yes, JJ's ppg and percentage is down a little bit, but perhaps injuries have a little to do with this. etc.]
And then the [somewhat[ legitimate insights he did have were really not that insightful. They were platitudes that any fan of this team has blindly repeated over and over again.
eastlaketb
December 29th, 2010
11:12 am
i can see now why larry drew is the lowest paid coach in the league.
northcyde
December 29th, 2010
11:18 am
Thanks J from the A. I’ll try to copy and post it here, but only give the web address without the direct hyperlink:
I mean . . when you look at the profile of Bibby, I can see why Drew opts to stay with him, despite him being a liability on defense.
As long as he’s protected with a big rotating over to help him . . or protected altogether by Bibby guarding the weaker guard . . it honestly hasn’t proved to be catastrophic IF Bibby is also making shots.
When the dude is making shots, the Hawks are usually clicking on all cylinders. It’s when Bibby doesn’t make shots, that all of these issues with him on defense really come to the forefront.
But the player profiles of both Bibby and Teague are interesting, to say the least. Teague puts up better overall individual numbers on a per 48 minute basis . . but he’s light years behind Bibby, when it comes to “team impact”.
Mike Bibby – 82games.com/1011/10ATL1.HTM
Jeff Teague – 82games.com/1011/10ATL2.HTM
But like I said in the last post, the last thing people need to see, is if Teague can be more effective playing with “the core” more.
i_am_soulstar
December 29th, 2010
11:32 am
Big Ray,
You beat me to it.
Teague rarely gets beat unless he runs into a hard screen. But I think that has as much to with Teague’s inability to fight through some screens as it does with the Hawks being lousy as a whole at defending the pick and roll.
But are the Hawks really better with Bibby in the starting lineup than Teague?? Such a small sample size because Teague almost never plays with the starters.
PER isn’t everything, but Teague has a 14.70 PER so far this season.
Bibby has 12.89.
Besides hitting the 3 ball and having an awesome assist-to-turnover ratio, there’s not much Bibby does better than Teague.
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
11:42 am
LOL @ people who stand up for Bibby.
On other teams like Houston or Sacramento, their main PGs go down and guys like Lowry and Udrih step up and have MONSTER games. If Teague went down and Bibby had to play more minutes at the PG (keep in mind Bibby is our #1 PG), he’d still do his usual 10 ppg and nothing else for us
GET RID OF THIS FAT PLAYER. HE IS NOT STARTER QUALITY
HE IS NOT IN SACRAMENTO ANYMORE
I.MUS WRITE
December 29th, 2010
11:45 am
I have no problem at all starting bibby. he is okay on defense but his Shot making cant be replaced Teague is a liability IMO-yeah hes fast /quick but he has no offensive game at all. floater after floater and he misses alot right at the rim. Seriously how is he any better than AC Law…..
Bibby has had a good year so far lets stop concentrating on his D we know its suspect but the guy is a flat out assasin shooting the rock-I’ll take that over teagues hustle and lack of shooting ability.
JC1/ZaZA/Mo/1st for Monte Ellis/Hunter
Monte
JJ
Smoove
Horford
Collins
Bench:
Marvin Teague Hunter Wilkins JC2 EThomas
Marvin should stay on the bench -he plays better as a sub-alot more agressive.
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
11:46 am
How can Teague NOT be developed if LD thinks he’s the PG of the future.
BIBBY WILL BE GONE REGARDLESS IN LESS THAN 2 YEARS. WHAT DO WE DO THEN? START OUR PG WHO PLAYS 15 MINUTES EVERY OTHER GAME?
GTFOH
START TEAGUE OR TRADE FOR A NEW PG
JeJe
December 29th, 2010
11:47 am
AND WHY DOES DAMIEN NOT PLAY ANYMORE?
YOU WANT TO SACRIFICE WINS SO YOU CAN “SHOWCASE” YOUR PLAYERS WHO WON’T EVEN BE TRADED
FIRE SUND
Rufus1
December 29th, 2010
11:49 am
J from the A I agree with you about Lagree for the most part…
But the fact that we are scoring 15 to 18pts in the 4th qt can’t be denied. It is hard for me to believe the Teague couldn’t lead the team to atleast 15pts in the 4th.
miko.wade@gmail.com
December 29th, 2010
11:49 am
Teague will be good in about 2 more years. He will never be an elite PG, but I think he will be good enough to be a floor leader. Right now, our PG’s can’t play any D on the bigger and faster guards such as: D Williams, D Rose, and Rondo.
I think the Hawks need to make some moves before the trade deadline!
Thanks,
http://www.the404list.com
Fundamentals
December 29th, 2010
11:56 am
MC – What’s the story on Horford’s hand? How long has he been dealing with the issue? What’s the prognosis on how many games he’d need to recover?
Rod from College Park
December 29th, 2010
12:16 pm
The reason Bibby is on the floor with the starters has more to do with personel than anything. Smith and Horford like to play on the perimeter, and neither has above average post moves. When teams play us they double Joe, which leaves someone on the perimeter open. Teams have not ever had to worry about Marvin, so the only guy of the starters that will get open jump shots and knock them down is Bibby. Marvin until this year, was never able to knock down open shots. Horford has become very good a knocking down the jump shot, this year as well. Bibby is one of the top 3 point shooters in the league because of the many open looks he gets based on our personel. Teauge has not proved that he can hit an open shot, and he can’t penetrate and finish either. His defense is better than Bibby and Jamal’s, but his offense is so terrible that his defense is not good enough to justify playing him before Bibby. If we start Teague, we will go thru very long scoring droughts, if Marvin can’t knock down open shots. Teams will double Joe, focus on Horford, and allow Josh Smith, Marvin, and Teague to beat them from the perimeter. I would take those odds all day. If Teague can’t shoot, he has to be able to pentrate and finish, which he has not shown that he can do.
Everyone here seems to harp on the defensive end of the floor, but again in the last two second round playoff blowouts to Cleveland, and Orlando, the Hawks averaged in the high 70’s one series, and the low 80’s in the other series. The team as constructed will not be able to score in the playoffs agianst good defensive teams unless Marvin can up his production offensively, which I doubt, and Teague (If he starts as most of you suggest) can learn how to penetrate and finish, because his jumper is broke.
O'Brien
December 29th, 2010
12:41 pm
Thanks for the link Rufus. One interesting paragraph to me was…
The Hawks are again giving up five more points per 100 possessions but they’re scoring only an extra 3.9 points per 100 possessions when Bibby, Crawford and Johnson play together.
The Hawks are essentially a .500 team (110.4 points scored, 109.6 points allowed per 100 possessions) when Bibby, Crawford and Johnson are all on the court even though, on 59 percent of the possessions they play together, Atlanta’s two best players, Al Horford and Josh Smith, share the court with them. .
Bibby has earned his PT. However, LD needs to keep a close eye on him. In the N.O. game, Bibby played 41 minutes, despite going 2-8 from the field, and he couldnt even guard Jarrett Jack.
Jamal played 34 minutes, despite only scoring 10 points, with 5 turnovers. Damien was DNPCD, Teague was DNPCD.
LD needs to do a better job of monitoring their minutes and performance. But so far, he consistently gives them guaranteed PT regardless of performance.
O'Brien
December 29th, 2010
12:43 pm
northcyde,
Dejuan Blair is balling again. Last night, dude had 17 and 15 against the Lakers. And for the season, he is averaging 7 and 7 in 20 mpg. Imagine if we had him as our backup PF.
RealSquawk
December 29th, 2010
12:54 pm
Thanks MC
Aaron
December 29th, 2010
1:01 pm
The rationale for Drew’s decisions are, sadly, similar to Mike Woodson’s:
His contract status.
LD has been given only two guaranteed years on his contract and he’s following a guy who was fired despite winning 53 games last year. Only an idiot would focus on the future.
Daniel
December 29th, 2010
1:02 pm
Big Ray- I like your post about LD, but I would say that the problems that he inherited and the comparisons to the previous coach come with the territory of hiring your own assistnat coach. Now, if you feel that LD can’t be blamed for that but it belongs with ownership then fine, but it is still up to LD to seperate himself and improve the team.
Although, I agree that it appears that LD has an inside mandate, I have never heard that spoken of publically. I have never heard LD give a coherent and consistent accounting of his role in the previous regimes failures, nor have I heard his “big picture” plan and/or goals.
Now we can assume that he is being evasive because of the big bad ownership, or we can assume that he is in over his head. The improvement in Marvin/Twin/(even a little bit)Bibby are all due to the kind of adjustments that SHOULD HAVE BEEN MADE by an assistant coach. What has he done that reflects the leadership of HEAD COACH? Anyone can call timeouts and draw up plays. The head coach is supposed to LEAD.
PS: It is amussing to read all these posts calling for consistent roles for Teague, but then suggest that every player (including the 90 day free agent) get adjusted playing time. Do you guys not realize that what you are asking for is counter productive to each scenario?
O'Brien
December 29th, 2010
1:31 pm
Daniel,
The only explanation LD gave about his role in the previous coaching regime (and I might be paraphrasing a little) was that “all he could do is make suggestions, and it was up to the HC (Woody) to decide what to use”.
That is basically what LD said at his press conference.
But he is in a tough spot, because ASG and Rick said they like their core, and they just had 53 wins and a second round appearance. LD does not have to win 53 games, but I think his team MUST make it to the second round (assuming everyone is healthy during the playoffs).
Otherwise, he will be under pressure next year, and he only has 2 years guaranteed on his deal.
no crying
December 29th, 2010
1:33 pm
Both Teague and Bibby are averaging .34 points per minute of game time. (Bubby 10.6pts/29 mins; Teague 4.6/12.5 Mins) Bibby is launching a whopping 4 three pointers a game and making all of two. Which is a whole lot of nothing. If teague is the better defender then it must comes down to how Teague runs the offense. Who knows what Teague could do with 30 min a game?
It seems that by driving the lane, Teague will draw fouls and open up the rest of the team for more open shots. Speed Kills! Let Bibby come in a launch his 3 pointers then go sit down. If Williams is doing better coming off the bench then it might work for Bibby as well. Having a second unit of with Bibby, JC1, MW sounds killer to me.
WEE WEEE
December 29th, 2010
1:35 pm
nice blog. but atlantas gaurds are good
bibby will be fine, hes good with teauge on his back
what they need is a solid center and a cap space for next year..
i heard sac town is trashing cousins beacause of his attitude. sund can send them an offer and give them williams. cousins will be happy playing in a winning team and hawks can work on his attitude like they did on smith..
if they want a cap space and make use the expiring contract of jamal crawford. send crawford williams and collins to sacramento for cousins and tyreke evans.. maybe it will work
and the hawks will be a very young and talented team
drmaryb (*_*)
December 29th, 2010
1:56 pm
Pure Asinine Stupidity!
It was not a bad pick? Is a MOLE on this Blog, So yall need to:
Get Your Scroll On!
Here is the last stupid thing IT said:
“Salim should still be playing for the Hawks..The kid could shoot,drive, and flat out score.”
Memorandum: I’m SMH and Srolling @ 160 mph (my car’s speedometer).
__________________________
Let’s Just Keep it Real on here!
Mike is back
December 29th, 2010
1:56 pm
Big Ray, I will admit some bloggers get a little over zealous when assessing Bibby’s overall value to the Hawks…and Je Je…THIS DUDE…get’s downright rabbit at time with his comments.heh heh
However, I don’t think the vast majority of bloggers are implying that LD should just simply hand the starting PG job over to Teague…just give dude another chance to challenge for increased PT…he’s earned that in spite of his shortcoming…same GOES FOR Collins.
Why the focus is on LD…let’s not forget…we are dealing with cash strap owners…THAT LOVE THEIR CORE…jeeeeeez…leave it lon mike.lol
So a major upgrade at the PG position via trade is highly unlikely…what other realistic option does LD have…Heck even LD himself said he thought Bibby could use a break…would that not warrant getting young Teague some more burn…just in case Bibby ends up needing some down time to sustain his new found youth, effort and energy.
Surely, we will need Bibby to perform as good or better come the playoff…let’s try to ease the wear and tear on Bibby too…just saying.
drmaryb (*_*)
December 29th, 2010
2:04 pm
Obrien
Great Analysis! But, when will the ASKG be held accountable for NOT providing winnable TOOLS for this team!
Even Phil Jackson could NOT win with this Motley-Crew!
Who could? At some point we have to rally around ANY Coach to manage this flawed bunch of millionaires. Who do yall think could do better with ALL these TWEENERS and NO PG nor Dominant Center?
I mean – Really? Phil wouldn’t even come here for this! Who would? Besides Drew? BTW, The Little General was NEVER coming here! Nor Shaq! Nor Melo!
Who would? We got what we got and that’s ALL to it! There is no one on this roster to take us any father, we probably regressed in the off-season!
Oscar
December 29th, 2010
2:11 pm
Larry Drew wants to be around for a long time, so what does he do? Stick with the veterans so he won’t get critizized. Mike Bibby should never have received an extension. Larry is thinking short term like Mike Woodson. You win now, but lose in the playoffs. Bibby will get them killed in the playoffs.
My recommendation:
At the start of the second half the game is zero-zero, start Jeff Teague and Jamal Crawford, move Joe Johnson to the three. They would provide energy and lessen the 3rd quarter drag. Also, this way you set it up for Teague and Crawford to be in the game at the end through your substitution pattern. Sure you give up defense at the two, but you gain at the one which has a higher priority (cutoff penetration into the lane, more problems). You will need Teague for the playoffs (his defense and penetration).
drmaryb (*_*)
December 29th, 2010
2:13 pm
Please Ignore the 17 user I’d’s as one person blogging on here!
Yall, know all the BS is coming from T.S. – right?
Why even feed That – Trolle? Those of us who’ve been blogging for 4 years KNOW who the real bloggers are!
Bump That: Wee Wee sh!t and carlos and ‘nem! Don’t respond to the silliness.
IMHO.
WEE WEEE
December 29th, 2010
2:23 pm
i don’t really know which point guard will run the team
but in my point of view, maybe teague is a better defender than bibby, but what i see now is that bbiby is playing hard and better. maybe hes not a good defender but as a veteran player he knows what do and improving and working hard on hes defense,
bibby is a better shooter than teague but teauge is faster and quicker. and bbiby knows when to take a shot. maybe teague is faster than bibby but speed is not everything bibby is the only one on the team that knows how to run the team so well.
maybe the reason why LD starts bibby because:
1. hes good 3 point shooter and a threat
2. he knows how to run the team and the only one that make the right decisions often
3. hes a good passer and and knows where to give the ball
4. maybe hes slowing but hes a well experienced veteran
and lastly; hes the pg that plays better with the starting 5 and maybe the rest of the team.
yes teague is fast quick and good defender. but bibby is playing for the team, he doesn’t care if hes numbers are low or having few minutes. and hes not being selfish hes just playing to win
Lacsho
December 29th, 2010
2:53 pm
WoW, if I recall Tony Parker had a horrible jump shot when he came in the league. I can’t recall seeing him on the bench, and if I’m correct they won a championship with a young Parker. Hmmm didn’t Boston win a championship with Rondo……
SMH at you Teague haters.
LD doesn’t have a clue, he’s another Woodson. There’s no other coach in the league that would start Bibby over Teague. If anyhting bring Bibby off the bench, and keep his legs fresh. Bibby can still average double figures playing 20-25 minutes per game. Moving forward, please get rid of Mo Evans; He’s flat out horrible. Oh yeah, if your not going to play JC2, why not send him down to the D league? (I’m just saying) Do we really need Jamal Crawford? Please tell me again, why we gave JJ a max contract.
Peace,
Sho
Grandad
December 29th, 2010
2:58 pm
Rev in Tampa;
It was a weak attempt @ humor based on *{{{SteveW @ 9:46 pm}}}
Just lampooning his hyperbole.
* “I have been an average sports page reader for over 30 years,
way before there were blogs and the internet. And I’m not trying
to exagerate, but I don’t think I’ve read a finer article anywhere”
superiorblogman
December 29th, 2010
3:49 pm
Javale McGhee would put the Hawks 1 step closer to legitimacy. A young 7 FT Center that can start every game would be great. I like Collins but he is not athletic enough to start against some bigs. McGhee would be right there with Smoove in athleticism and he could learn the veteran big man defense by battling Etan and Collins.
Zaza and a 1st for McGhee
It was not a bad pick
December 29th, 2010
3:57 pm
drmaryb (*_*) ?
Salim had talent…woody never gave him a chance..the hawks coaching staff never give players the oppurtunity to shine..Jordan crawford should be in the rotation, I have no idea why Drew is not playing Teauge, He rather play Jamal at pg and not his natural position(sg)..this happens with all the Hawks young guys…Oh yeah let my nuts go..All that i ever said was that Marvin can be a big time scorer…D
Ken Strickland
December 29th, 2010
4:04 pm
For the record, my support for HC LDrew hasn’t wavered. I still think he’s proven to be a huge improvement over MWoodson, and a much better fit for the team long term. He’s not perfect, and he’s starting to demonstrate that, but I’m not going to throw the baby out with the wash.
In light of the Lakers recent woe’s, how many of you TRADE FANATICS, who seem to think making trades is the only solution to everything, feel they should immediately start breaking up the team and making trades?
Samuel
December 29th, 2010
4:30 pm
LD hasn’t proven a dam thing. We’re in 5th place with a good likely hood that we’ll finish lower and get beat in the first round of the playoffs.
Ken, there you go again, comparing back to back champions to “nobodys”. Everybody in the world (including you) know this team’s ceiling is no more than a 2nd round playoff appearance. The Lakers are proven. I don’t get it.
Teague has not taken the starting job because he too passive and has no leadership ability. As much as I have supported Mike Bibby, even I know he’s on his way down but I still don’t see Teague taking over. He has no confidence and is scared to take on the leadership role. You guys keep saying how good he is on defense. I don’t see it. he get’s beat off the dribble as much as the rest of them. Tonight will be a good test.
My Boy, Monta Ellis, will be in town. let’s see what Teague got. Will he step up or get “ABUSED”.
Grandad
December 29th, 2010
4:50 pm
New blog on front page.
Big Ray
December 29th, 2010
5:28 pm
Northcyde ,
Sorry, I can only resuce posts on my own blog. I would have loved to have read what you posted.
Samuel ,
I agree that Larry Drew is worse with Jordan Crawford when clearly the youngster can PLAY. No excuses for that, especially when he could become so much more balanced than Jamal is, if only he is developed.
Vava ,
Was that same person the one decrying Mike Bibby all offseason long and saying that Teague should take his spot?
Fundamentals
December 29th, 2010
5:45 pm
McGhee is the stout young talent that can help Al. Bring him in along with Hinrich to bolster our needs down low for Crawford. Gives them a nice expiring contract as well as a “shotmaker” to go along with Wall.
eastlaketb
December 29th, 2010
5:52 pm
i just want the best 4 the city and with what we have now we will get swept in the 1st round no dought. my new years wish is that Authur Blank some how come to our rescue and get this franchise on soilid ground. 2 make a long story short we gotta make changes top 2 bottom.
Ken Strickland
December 29th, 2010
7:05 pm
Instead of relying on mathmatical formulas to judge Bibby and Teague, let’s watch tonight’s gm and judge for ourselves. Let’s see how they fair against the Warriors very talented G’s, and see who does what against who. Then we can discuss what we saw after the gm.
Drew is a dumb ass
December 29th, 2010
7:29 pm
Drew better play Teague.
Here come stup!d Mo Evans
December 29th, 2010
7:32 pm
Enter your comments here
Here come stup!d Mo Evans
December 29th, 2010
7:32 pm
or not.
jase
December 29th, 2010
7:50 pm
were is teague
Samuel
December 29th, 2010
8:12 pm
Ken,so far, Bibby is winning hands down. LOL!!
Wabe
December 29th, 2010
8:52 pm
That last fast break is the ideal example why I can’t stand Mo Evans.
He’s a F’N bum.
You have a 3 on 2 and as soon as Jamal passes the ball to Mo – Mo takes it right to the rack himself and misses the layup.
hawksfan12
December 30th, 2010
12:30 pm
can we please trade mike bibby and jaml crawford to the bobcats for DJ augustin and gerald wallace? the bobcats want a veteran guard and a scoring guard. they get both and we get rid of jamal crawford’s contract and bring in a point gaurd who averages more points than bibby anyway. plus wallace can contribute 2