Atlanta Hawks: Hawks 102, Pacers 92

The Pacers couldn't stop Josh Smith. (AP Photo)

The Pacers couldn't stop Josh Smith. (AP Photo)

Indianapolis–If their defensive energy is going to vary depending on how often their shots go in, then at least the Hawks are humming on offense more often than not. Facing a physical opponent, the Hawks were crisp, patient and effective scoring the ball and improved to 5-1 on the road.

Smoove was inside, outside and everywhere in between, making his jumpers and getting to the line. Bibby made the Pacers pay for collapsing on Smoove, then handed out dimes when the defense ran at him. Al damaged the Pacers with pick-and-pops in the fourth quarter. Marvin was efficient. J.J. wasn’t hitting so he passed.

– Clearly one early trait of the Hawks under L.D. is that they really are buying into moving the ball and spreading around the scoring. “He puts new wrinkles in probably every week,” J.J. said. “I think that keeps us fine-tuned to what he wants and what we are doing out there.”

– “They’ve got a lot of people you have to stop,” Pacers coach Jim O’Brien said.

– Smoove dominated with 25 points, eight rebounds and seven blocked shots (the Pacers had six). “That’s a pretty good line,” L.D. said. “He made a couple mistakes but they were aggressive mistakes. ”

– Josh had three blocks within the first five minutes and from then on you could see the Pacers peeking to see if he was coming over to help on drives. Hibbert missed a layup in the fourth quarter because he felt Smoove.

– “Every night my teammates depend on me to give us energy,” Smove said. “I can’t let them down. I’ve got to play well.”

– J.J. came out on the losing end of his tussle with Danny Granger, who is a big, strong guy. J.J. can’t displace Granger like he can most defenders. The matchup wore J.J. down and frustrated him at times–he and Granger got double technicals in the third quarter.

– Still, J.J. had five assists and Bibby benefited from Indiana’s focus on him. “When we get into offensive sets, everyone knows we are going to feature Joe,” L.D. said. “He’s been very unselfish. He did a great job of finding the open man.”

–The Hawks’ bench was complaining about Indiana’s hand-checks and roughhousing in the first half. That made it tough for J.J. and the other guards to get into the lane and there also wasn’t much room for Smoove and Al to operate. The Hawks played through it until they started getting some whistles after halftime.

– “That’s kind of part of understanding how to win on the road,” L.D. said. “You are not going to get calls. We don’t expect it. You have to play through it.”

– Atlanta never did get calls in the first half but it hardly mattered once Bibby started draining 3s. He made all three attempts in the second quarter. “When you can get any guard to start knocking down consistent threes, it opens up the post-up for us bigs,” Josh said.

– Al was pretty stout against Hibbert, who never did back him down and score consistently. Hibbert said he spent time in the summer studying tape of his matchups with Al. Horford’s strategy: “Just contain him, keep him off the paint and make him shoot over the top. Obviously he’s gotten better but we weren’t going to come double and just kind of let him shoot over the top.”

– L.D. said the Hawks wanted to make Hibbert, the league’s top shot blocker, defend a lot of pick-and-rolls. Hibbert had one blocked shot in 33 minutes. “If you play a halfcourt game and allow him to sit there he can affect the game,” L.D. said. “We wanted to get him on the move.”

– Al picked up his second foul early in the second quarter and L.D. again gave him the hook. Horford said he was “frustrated” by having to sit.

– Horford took over during the 9-0 run that essentially put Indiana away. He started the spurt by scoring over Hibbert on a power move, made a jumper, found J.J. going baseline for an and-1 and then made another jumper. “I stuck with it and the guys really found me,” he said. “I was just ready to step in and make shots.”

– Hibbert had 15 rebounds as the Pacers had a 42-30 edge on the board. L.D. said the Hawks only sent their centers and power forwards to the offensive boards because they were focused on getting back in transition to cut off 3-pointers. Indiana had four fastbreak points and was 4 of 18 on 3-pointers.

Powell played only three minutes, most of those at center. Hibbert scored over him easily so L.D. went to Collins, who lasted only five minutes.

– Teague made a pair of 3-pointers to help Atlanta stay close in the first quarter. He also had three assists with no turnovers and three rebounds. His on-ball defense is invaluable to the Hawks.

– Marvin limped off in the fourth quarter and iced his knee on the bench. He said he could have gone back in if needed.

– The Pacers played without Darren Collison. T.J. Ford is a capable backup, and Bibby had his problems against him, but Indiana could have used Collison’s shooting.

– L.D. gave the Hawks Wednesday off.

– I’m out, Hawks fans.

MC

155 comments Add your comment

Grandad

November 16th, 2010
11:52 pm

1st to say congrats to LD & that beautiful “team” offense!

Grandad

November 16th, 2010
11:53 pm

Alan

November 17th, 2010
12:00 am

Earlier tonight on NBA TV Network Ernie Johnson asked Chris Webber where the Hawks stood in the Eastern Conference. Webber responded by saying the Hawks will not make the playoffs and that they just ” aren’t good “.

terrell

November 17th, 2010
12:05 am

Teague 2 of 3 from deep? Wow!

Rufus1

November 17th, 2010
12:24 am

@Alan

Webber must be smoking….. He probably pick the Rockets and knicks to be good this year.

Section 303

November 17th, 2010
12:31 am

Nice win. Hope they respond well to the time off. You never know…sometimes it has a negative effect. They need the rest, though.

Already looking forward to the Dallas game on Saturday.

MsDee

November 17th, 2010
12:32 am

I’m not sure why all these fans are hating on LD from siting our #1 ALL-STAR CENTER down after 2 fouls early in the 1st quarter?? If i’m not mistaken, DONT EVERY COACH SIT THERE ONE AND ONLY BIG MAN DOWN AFTER PICKING UP 2 QUICK FOULS?????????????????? If AL picks up his 3rd foul shortly after, you guys would still be trippin saying he should not have left him in. If AL wants to stay in the game, he has to learn how not to foul so easily. Josh doesn’t pick up his 2nd foul til about the 3rd quarter with all the defense and blocks he gets thru-out the game. So stop hating on LD for being a smart coach and not a dumb spectator like some of yall!!

Bailey

November 17th, 2010
12:35 am

So, apparently Horford was “frustrated” by having to sit out yet another second quarter with just 2 fouls. That’s understandable, I would be frustrated too. I wonder though, if he was frustrated at himself for picking up the fouls, frustrated at L.D. for not letting him play with 2 fouls, or both?

At any rate, a lot of people seem to be getting tired of this 2 foul benching nonsense. At least the Hawks got the win. On a positive note, the offense looked pretty good tonight, and that was against a very aggressive defensive effort by the Pacers. Nice team win.

Hawks Fan In New Orleans

November 17th, 2010
12:39 am

@ Alan, Chris Webber is an idiot. What 8 teams are going to finish ahead of ATL? Webber will most likely be eating crow like all the idiots who doubted Vick. LOL.

I see a lot of maturity and organic growth in the fact the even though Joe Johnson is struggling the Hawks are still competing and winning on the road.

Leon

November 17th, 2010
12:57 am

MsDee,

In regards to benching Al when he picks up two fouls, I think the main issue that a lot of people are having is that they feel that Al would be fine playing with two fouls. He’s not a heavily foul prone player, and in the past he has shown that he can play through foul trouble. It’s understandable to want to sit your key players when they pick up early fouls to preserve them for later in the game, but in some instances it hurts the team more than helping them. A key example of that is the Orlando Magic game earlier this year. L.D. elected to bench Horford at a key turning point in the game when the Hawks actually had the edge, and when he saw the momentum shifting, he thought it would be more effective to save Horford for later and it ended up hurting the team in the long run.

I could understand if Horford was notorious for picking up early fouls and getting into foul trouble throughout games, sort of like Greg Oden was, but that’s just not Al Horford. Horford has done pretty well in the past staying out of foul trouble once he picks up early fouls, and if you need evidence, look at tonight’s game. Horford was taken out with 2 fouls and he ended up finishing up the game with a total of 2 fouls. Part of player development is letting your players learn to play through foul trouble, instead of taking them out all of the time.

Also, you mention that most teams do take out their star big men when they get into foul trouble. That’s true to some extent, but most coaches I’ve watched aren’t as cautious as L.D. Two fouls in the first half isn’t something to panic over. You have 6 for a game, and opposing players aren’t going to be going after you to try and foul you out until you hit around the 4 foul mark. Even if L.D. gambled and let Al stay in in the first half and he picked up a third foul, it would jeopardize the team or his usage. At that point, L.D. could take him out and he’d be fine to start the third quarter. Most likely, Al wouldn’t pick up that third foul anyway.

Also, if you want an example of a similar instance on another team, take the Orlando Magic for instance. Dwight Howard, for one, is far, far more foul prone than Al Horford and Stan Van Gundy is probably the most worrisome coach in the league, yet even Van Gundy will allow Dwight to stay in the second quarter (usually to some extent when he picks up a second foul). Van Gundy knows that the team will start to slide if he takes Dwight out, so he weighs out the risks and does what is best. That’s basically what he did in our game against them earlier in the season. Dwight picked up two fouls in the first half also, but Van Gundy let him continue playing. L.D. should do the same thing. If Al starts really getting into heavy foul trouble, or starts fouling out of games (which is highly unlikely), then L.D. could maybe resort to doing what he has been doing now, but until that happens, there’s no legitimate argument for benching one of your best players in a close game when he only has 2 fouls. If he picked up two fouls in the first quarter, I would sit him for the rest of the quarter and probably half of the second, but I know Al isn’t a foul prone player anyway.

One other thing that bothers me is that L.D. doesn’t seem to treat all of his players this way, in terms of sitting them due to early foul trouble. First off, it’s understandable to be more cautious with your big men, since they are typically more foul prone due to all the physicality down low. However, I’ve noticed that L.D. has never benched Josh for an entire quarter due to foul trouble, and I’ve seen Josh pick up 2 fouls in the first half before. Also, when you look at guards, L.D. would never bench Joe for a quarter due to foul trouble unless it was an extreme situation. There needs to be a set of ground rules if you use a system like this, and no player should be exempt without proving otherwise.

Leon

November 17th, 2010
1:00 am

Correction on my last post:

I meant to say “wouldn’t jeopardize” not “would jeopardize”.

Muppet

November 17th, 2010
1:07 am

@Alan

A lot of the “experts” on NBA TV are just bandwagon guys who will say what the media thinks people want to hear. Weber, Barkeley, McHale, etc. never give very good predictions. Barkeley and those guys were pretty much sold last year that the Cavaliers were going to win it all and completely counted Boston out. Then, they were all on the Miami Heat bandwagon before the season started, and once they season got going and the heat started losing, they jumped onto the Celtic bandwagon in the east. I really don’t take much of what they say seriously.

Weber says something different in his predictions almost every week. First, he had said that the Hawks weren’t going to to be good and claimed that they wouldn’t make the playoffs. After they got off to that 6-0 start, he apologized and said that he was wrong and claimed that they would be good this year and said he wanted to retract his previous statements. Now, after they went on a losing streak, he thinks they’re bad again and won’t make the playoffs. LOL. The guy is more Jekyll and Hyde than the Hawks team was last year. If the Hawks end up going on another big winning streak, look for him to say that they’ll be a top 4 seed in a couple of weeks.

Shyne G

November 17th, 2010
1:21 am

Great coaching by Drew. He may not be the coach that most commentators envisioned at the start of the season, but in my opinion he has been solid. The guy actually tinkers the rotation and plays based on performance instead of showing favoritism.

Josh Smith

Let me be the first to point out his contributions to this team on both the offensive and defensive end. The accurancy that this guy is shooting is phenomenal. It gives us another shooter on the court that is able to space the floor in this new offense and makes things even harder for the opposition to defend. Defensively, when he is jumping all over the place contesting every shot attempt, it creates much needed stops to capitalize on the other end. He and Al Horford, to me, are already in mid-season form even though Joe is currently suffering from flu-like symptoms. It shows another level of maturity for guys to step up like they did tonight when your star player isn’t producing.

Great win. Go Hawks!

northcyde

November 17th, 2010
1:23 am

To me, the issue isn’t Drew taking Horford out after 2 fouls, it’s the amount of time he’s leaving him out. And even when he doesn’t have 2 fouls, he’ll sit for 10 minute stretches at times in the middle of the 1st half.

In the beginning, Drew was trying to develp Powell a little too much, which took away from Horford’s floor time. Now he’s doing what the former coach used to do with starters when they got 2 fouls in the 1st half.

Now granted, this tactic does give bench players a chance to play and prove their worth ( supposedly what the fans want, so our key players won’t be worn out by playoff time ).

But when the bench is sorry ( especially the bigs ), no amount of extra playing time is going to turn them “un-sorry”. So every attempt should be made to get Horford his 32 – 35 minutes a night . . unless we just don’t absolutely need him.

As for the game, it’s always good to see Smith in “beast mode” as some call it. When he’s playing like that, he’s an elite level player. And as long as he’s making 40% of his long 2 point shots, there’s nothing that can really be said about him taking the shot. I just want him to know when that shot isn’t falling, and always look to go to the hole first.

The Truth

November 17th, 2010
1:27 am

” “Every night my teammates depend on me to give us energy,” Smove said. “I can’t let them down. I’ve got to play well.”

Perhaps the clearest sign of growth and maturity by Josh Smith, he showed us the whole package in this game, both inside and outside. However, the flip side of this story though, if we ever loss Josh to any injury, this team would go up side down. Since he is the real MVP on this team he would be irreplaceable. No one else on the Hawks roster brings as much as Josh brings to the table. The Hawks would be badly exposed in this unfortunate scenario. Let’s hope this never happen.

Shyne G

November 17th, 2010
1:32 am

I believe Josh is trying to acheive his goals from last season…

lewis

November 17th, 2010
2:28 am

much needed rest before we take on Dallas and Boston Sat / Mon.

if we could beat them both we could possibly go on an 8gm win streak before facing the heat, who we match pretty well with. extremely slim chances but if marvin, mo and joe come back rested its possible.

TRADE JAMAL.
What does this guy add to a motion offense necessarily?
Does nothing on defense.
Always has negative +-.
Prevents Teague from running the second team offense properly.
Not into it at all.
Constantly dealing with back pain.
He’s a great scorer but that’s clearly not what this team needs.

MsDee

November 17th, 2010
2:57 am

@Leon, you said, “in regards to benching Al when he picks up two fouls, I think the main issue that a lot of people are having is that they feel that Al would be fine playing with two fouls. He’s not a heavily foul prone player, and in the past he has shown that he can play through foul trouble. It’s understandable to want to sit your key players when they pick up early fouls to preserve them for later in the game, but in some instances it hurts the team more than helping them.”

I want to believe that LD is trying to also TRY and teach AL a lesson by NOT PICKING UP UNNECESSARY fouls TOO early in the game when you are very much needed on the floor. This IS early in the season so if Coach Drew wants to teach any of his players a lesson, I’m all for him doing it early than later in the season.

You also said, “if you want an example of a similar instance on another team, take the Orlando Magic for instance. Dwight Howard, for one, is far, far more foul prone than Al Horford and Stan Van Gundy is probably the most worrisome coach in the league, yet even Van Gundy will allow Dwight to stay in the second quarter (usually to some extent when he picks up a second foul). Van Gundy knows that the team will start to slide if he takes Dwight out, so he weighs out the risks and does what is best.”

Now the difference between LD and Van Gundy is that Van Gundy is a VERY EXPERIENCED COACH, whereas, LD is a ROOKIE COACH! Van Gundy already has a comfort zone where he can take chances like that with Dwight..LD has to create HIS OWN comfort zone when it comes to making the RIGHT decision for him and his team. If his constance is telling him to take AL out with 2 QUICK FOULS,( I might add) than so be it..Im not mad at him for that. You cant compare a Rookie coach to a veteran coach..that’s just not fair..now if you were to compare him to New Orleans coach, than you might have a case, but even still, I’m not mad at LD decision on AL cause this will help both guys out in the long run as the season continues. LD may end up developing a peace of mind leaving him out there.

MsDee

November 17th, 2010
3:02 am

Another reason why I’m not all BENT OUT OF SHAPE like these fans on here about LD sitting AL with

MsDee

November 17th, 2010
3:08 am

Another reason why I’m not all BENT OUT OF SHAPE like these fans on here about LD sitting AL with 2 QUICK FOULS, is because AL is a Warrior, a LEADER, with extremely HIGH B-BALL IQ who knows how to handle any situation he is faced. Yeah, LD sits him longer than you guys THINK he should sit him, yet and still, AL comes back into the game producing like he never left!! Its NOTHING WRONG with LD TRYING to help develop his bench (once again early on into the season) so that these guys wont be burnt out by the time playoffs arrives. This is a new experience for LD, allow him to make his mistakes EARLY ON IN THE SEASON..WE ARE 8-4 FOR GOODNESS SAKE, NOT 6-6!!

MsDee

November 17th, 2010
3:11 am

CORRECTION: allow him to make his ADJUSTMENTS at HIS own pace,not mistakes (cause they aren’t mistakes) EARLY ON IN THE SEASON..WE ARE 8-4 FOR GOODNESS SAKE, NOT 6-6!!

Najeh Davenpoop

November 17th, 2010
3:24 am

I’d rather LD get the experimentation and tinkering out of the way early so that he can settle on a rotation come playoff time, instead of letting the bench players rot all year and suddenly scramble to use them against Orlando in the playoffs like Woody. I still don’t think most of the Hawks’ bench players, particularly the big men, are worth their weight in sh-t, but I don’t have too much of a problem with LD trying different combinations now to figure out who he can rely on. Yes, it is frustrating to see Horford limited to 10 minutes in the first half if he picks up two fouls early, but it would be a lot more frustrating to see Zaza and Collins on the floor in crunch time.

I didn’t get a chance to see this game until the last five minutes, but I see the Hawks only turned it over 9 times today. I am too lazy to look up all the box scores for this season, but I believe that is a season low, and hopefully it means they are progressing in their understanding of the new offense.

Leon

November 17th, 2010
4:41 am

MsDee,

I can’t say I agree that holding Horford out for an entire quarter is really “teaching” him anything useful. You don’t often teach your players much by pulling them out of the game right when they do something wrong. If that was the case, L.D. wouldn’t be playing Teague as much as he is. In fact, he’d barely be playing him at all. Aside from that though, I don’t think Horford needs to be taught much at all in regards to managing his fouls. As you said yourself, Horford is a very high-IQ player, and if you take a look as his NBA career as a whole, you’ll see that he’s not a very foul prone player. I believe Al is already aware of how to scale down on the fouls when he is in foul trouble. L.D. just hasn’t given him the chance to do so yet, and L.D. even said himself that it is not his policy to pull Al out for entire long stretches due to foul trouble, it just happened to turn out that way early on. Whether or not that is true still remains to be seen.

Also, you mention that it’s unfair to compare L.D. to an experienced head coach. Well, the fact of the matter is, experienced or not, he’s in the head coaching position right now and is expected to know how to manage his players’ minutes if he is to coach the team effectively. L.D. has been an assistant coach under woodson for Al Horford’s entire pro career, and should be very familiar with Horford’s tendencies. Also, L.D.’s “comfort zone” with Al is not going to develop without allowing Horford to at least take a chance at playing with a couple of early fouls. It’s not like Horford is making terrible decisions and just taking silly fouls. Most of the early fouls that have been called on him have been “ticky-tac” fouls (as some like to call them). Horford only averages about 2.7 fouls per game, which is pretty good for a big man.

Plus, I think the lack of experience is what is causing L.D. to follow Mike Woodson’s two-foul benching approach, considering that he hasn’t seen anything else used while working with the Hawks and Horford. However, it would be more beneficial to both Horford and L.D. if he at least attempted to leave Horford in or at least not sit him for such long stretches so that he can assess the risks/rewards instead of always going with the overcautious approach.

As far as rookie coaches go, L.D. is pretty much on his own with the approach he is using for Horford. Tom Thibodeau is a rookie head coach and while I don’t approve of his current rotation management, he’s playing guys like Noah (who are much more foul prone than Horford) 40+ minutes per game. That’s going a bit overboard with the minutes, but I just wanted to through an example out there.

On another note, I’m all for L.D. trying to develop his bench, but developing the bench doesn’t have to be done at Al Horford’s sole expense. It is possible to use various combinations and manage the rotation so that Al and Josh can still play around 33-35 minutes per game, while the bench players get their 14+ minutes per night. I just don’t really like the idea that our All-star center is still being underutilized after all of these years, even though he continues to develop more and more and plays like a beast out there every so often. Think about it, how many All-Star big men can you think of that play less than 30 minutes per night, unless they are coming off of an injury?

It’s early in the season and right now, Al’s lack of minutes and his recurring bench treatment hasn’t hurt us as much as it could have due to the level of competition and some very hot shooting, but this could become an issue if L.D. keeps this up once the schedule picks up.

I know that L.D. is new to this head coaching position, so I am quick to cut him slack, but I just hope that he doesn’t make a habit of managing Al’s fouls and minutes the way he is doing it now. Hopefully, the growing pains start to subside as the season goes on.

Also, just to clarify, I noticed that one of your posts earlier was talking about people arguing over Horford being taken out when he picks up two fouls in the first quarter. I am okay with him being taken out in the first quarter if he picks up two fouls, but what I’m referring to mostly is L.D.’s approach to sitting Al for entire second quarters if he has two fouls, or taking him out very early in the second quarter if he picks up that second foul. I just wanted to make sure we were clear on that.

Leon

November 17th, 2010
4:43 am

Correction on my last post:

I meant to say “throw an example”, not “through an example”.

vava74

November 17th, 2010
5:06 am

We are 8-4 and only in the loss against MIL we were not in position to win the game during the last minutes.

The losses cam with Mo and Marvin either injured or severely limited (they still are).

There several lingering issues from last year still not solved: inconsistency between and within games, poor decision making in the crunch, defense on quick PGs and pick and roll D, … BUT there are clear progresses.

We have been picking up wins with JJ struggling.

The offense is clearly more varied and does not stall like we did last year against for instance zone Ds.

The 8-4 sample is too small to take definitive conclusions on our success in eliminating the problems we had, however, it’s big enough to show that there are already significant progresses on other fronts.

Let’s be patient.

MsDee

November 17th, 2010
6:26 am

@Leon,

I do understand where you are coming from concerning AL and how long LD keeps him out, but haven’t you notice, LD uses his rotation based on how the game is flowing. I’m sure that if the game was getting far too away from us in the PF/C position that LD would have IMMEDIATELY put AL back in regardless of AL’s foul situation. I guess that’s why I’m enjoying everything about LD decision making thus far cause he bases everything from players to offensive/defensive plays on the flow of the game. Not the way Woody would do which was everybody would play the EXACTLY amount of min per game, NO MATTER WHO IS ON AND WHO IS OFF, everyone was designated their min per/game and that was STUPID, IMO of course!!

Will

November 17th, 2010
6:48 am

The best I have ever seen the hawks play,
and if they played this way most of the time
they would win a nba championship.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
7:27 am

MsDee,

This was from MC’s blog.

“Al picked up his second foul early in the second quarter and L.D. again gave him the hook. Horford said he was “frustrated” by having to sit .”

Al finished the game with only 2 fouls. I know thats hindsight, but Al has never been the type of player who fouls out often, so LD could have left him in. So what if he picks up 3 in the first half?

That just means he can only pick up 2 in the second half. And by giving him the quick hook, its telling Al that LD doesnt trust him to handle playing with 2 fouls.

Give him a chance LD. If he picks up a quick 3rd foul, or if he fouls out of the game, then you can revaluate next time.

But Al is one of the smartest players on the team. Set him free. Oh, and BTW, Al is shooting 64% on the season. Give the man for field goal attempts.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
7:35 am

As for the game itself, overall we played well, and I was surprised to see Teague make a couple 3s (the whole team was probably surprised).

People are quick to talk about Teague’s bad shot (and they’re right), but I’ll bring this up again. Marvin Williams is 2-14 (15%) from behind the 3pt line on the season. And he has a very smooth stroke.

Teague is 3-8 (38%) from behind the 3pt line, and 13-14 from the FT line (93%). So the guy is still an asset.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
7:41 am

Great game from Josh. And I’m sure LD will keep working with him, because he still makes a couple bad decisions here and there. But he is a game changer.

Only 9 turnovers was great to see. If we keep our turovers to 10 or less, we should be in every game. One thing that helped us win this game was we were 8-15 from 3. Thats probably the best we’ve shot all year.

One concern, which has been a problem all season. Rebounding . We were outrebounded by 12.

Horford with 6 rebounds in 31 minutes? Thats bad. I dont know whats happened to his rebounding. His last 5 games rebounding? 5, 6, 8, 10, and 6. We need more rebounding from our starting center.

And even 8 for Josh is low. We need at least 10 rebounds each from Josh and Al every game. Hibbert had 15 in 33 minutes. We must improve our rebounding.

yodaddy

November 17th, 2010
8:34 am

when you shoot 50% from the field there’s not a lot of rebounding going on.

yodaddy

November 17th, 2010
8:52 am

also when you shoot a lot of jumpers rebounds are longer…explaining Bibby & Teague having 3 rebounds each.

But i also see rebounding…particularly defensive rebounding as an area they have to shore up…but teams can improve that slightly by positioning and things like that but can’t improve it dramatically.

Last year the Celtics were pretty average as far as rebounding so it can still work…

Kwa

November 17th, 2010
9:17 am

LD is doing a great job thus far. Us arm-chair quarterbacks think we know whats best for what the coach should or should not be doing with Horford and his 2 fouls. But its early on in the season, let things play out and see what types of patterns emerge.
Powell is just not getting it done.
Zaza i will never expect anything significant from.
JC1 i am very on the fence about him now/(defensive liability (possible trade is lookin better by the game)
JC2 i would like to see get more playing time
JT is proving himself to be a valuable defensive addition
Bibz is still knockin down treys though no defensive presence

Mike is back

November 17th, 2010
9:30 am

MC, nice commentary on the game…THAT WAS A TREMENDOUS DEFENSIVE EFFORT BY THE HAWKS…great win!

Those were perhaps the most astute post game comments of young Josh career. Dude still has his moments…however I love the efforts, energy, and passion Josh has played with thus far…no reason why he can’t ascend to ALL Star level with the elite players in this league…I’m impress!!
Kudos to LD…for getting his guys refocused…after a spate of adversity…they have some big games coming up…LIKE THE BIRDS…this will be a great time to send a message to the rest of the league…THAT WE ARE FOR REAL FOLK!!! LOL

Doc, still don’t get a chance to post much…I you hope had a great time with yo sweet pea at the game…mine want be home until next week.

GO
HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

J from the A

November 17th, 2010
9:42 am

I am really confused. I keep hearing that Bibby is a defensive liability and that Teague’s on-ball defense is solid. But then I watch the games, and I tend to see a different story.

Bibby’s defensive fundamentals are good. He is really working hard on defense this year. He fights through screens better than either Teague or Jamal. He is rarely caught out of position.
Of course, Bibby has lost a step, and the faster point guards can expose this weakness.

On the other hand, Teague has the tools to stay in front of the better point guards in the league, but his actual defensive performance is very inconsistent. Much more often than Bibby, he finds himself out of position, and he doesn’t seem to fight as hard through screens. The result is that although he has the speed, quickness, and strength to match-up well against the best guards, Teague often enough gets burned by even mediocre guards.

I mean was I the only watching the first half of the game last night? Teague’s (and Jamal’s for that matter) defense was atrocious. Teague looked lost at times. On the other hand, Bibby looked solid — not great, but very solid and very consistent.

J from the A

November 17th, 2010
9:45 am

My confusion aside (previous comment), the Hawks looked good. The offense was clicking even though Joe was having an off-game, and aside from a horrible defensive stretch in the first half, the defense was solid. I really liked the fact that in crunch time — even when Indiana looked like they were going to make a run in the 4th — the Hawks held their composure and stayed within their gameplan. Very nice to win.

Klub03

November 17th, 2010
9:47 am

Hey Hawks fans, what do ya’ll think about this story?

Geoff Petrie, who tried to pry Darren Collison from New Orleans before the former UCLA star was traded to Indiana, more recently inquired about Atlanta Hawks backup Jeff Teague, with Thompson reportedly part of the conversation. “It’s the NBA,” Thompson said after Tuesday’s practice, in a matter-of-fact manner. “It’s a business. It’s kind of good when your name is floated out there. It means you’re well -known, you’re wanted. The story book is me ending my career here and winning some division titles and getting to the playoffs. But the book isn’t finished yet, so you never know.” Sacramento Bee

Mike is back

November 17th, 2010
9:49 am

Doc, That should have read…I hope you had a nice time with yo sweet pea…although I should have said sweet peas…in your case. lol

Jamillion

November 17th, 2010
9:57 am

I POSTED THIS THE OtHER DAY. AND I’LL SAY THIS AGAIN. THE HAWKS ARE A SOLID TEAM. WE JUST DON’T HAVE THAT GUY WHO CAN CLOSE OuT GAMES. AND I ALSO SAID THIS. THE TEAM PLAYS SO MuCH BETTER WHEN BIBBY IS AT THE POINT CAUSE THE OFFENSE IS BEING RAN CORRECTLY, AND THE OFFENSE RUNS BEST THRU JOSH SMITH. JOSH HAS DEVELOPED A SHOT, THE ONE KNOCK ON HIS GAME. IT’S LIKE MIKE VICK WITH ACCURACY. IT’S A BEAUTIFUL THING. IT’S THE BEST ATHLETE WITH A COMPLETE GAME LD I’M IMPRESSED WITH HIS COACHING..JUST WONDER HOW GOOD WOULD THESE GUYS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED,WHEN BILLY TRIED TO FIRE WOODY AND HIRE dREW BUT THE SPIRIT WOULDN’T LET HIM. AL AND SMOOVES GAMES A BE WAY MORE ADVANCED. ON MY LAST NOTE WHY AND WHO DOES THESE POWER RANKINGS. IT’S TEAMS WHO HAVE LOSING RECORDS OR AT FIVE HUNDRED AHEAD OF THE HAWKS. DO THESE GUYS LOOK AT THE GAMES OR JUST BASE THIS ON POPULARITY. THERE IS NO WAY HOUSTON IS A TOP FIFTHTEEN TEAM AT 3 AND 8. IT’S JUST DISRESPECTFUL TO THE LEAGUE TO FEED US THIS JOURNALISM. DO THEY THINK WE THE FANS ARE

Alp

November 17th, 2010
10:11 am

ENOUGH! These guys are all human as well, where is the support, where is positivity! everyone (including national media) sounds like we are 0-8 and just drowning! Last night Chris Webber said on NBA TV ” I dont think Hawks will make the Playoff’s” really C Webb? After beating pacers in Indy, the team who dropped 155 on Melo? Why this much hate? Let these guys play some ball!! Is this really fair to Josh or Horford? show me another player working as hard as Josh? and he is 24! No offense but Dominic Wilkins could not shoot the ball till he was 27! And one shout out to Atlanta Spirit : ” Reduce the ticket prices!”

Astro Joe

November 17th, 2010
10:34 am

Does anyone around here realize that Al Horford is averaging 20/10 on a per 36 minute basis? The only thing stopping Al from having a defining season for elite big men is his coach who sits him after 2 early fouls. Josh is having a superb season, but let’s not lose sight of the fact that Horford is approaching 20/10 and shooting over 60% from the field. I mean, DAMN!

J from the A

November 17th, 2010
10:39 am

Co-sign Astro Joe’s 10:34 comment.

If Al continues at this pace, he is definitely deserving of a repeat All Star appearance.

The same for Josh, too. If he continues at this pace, he is definitely deserving his 1st All Star appearance. However, with fan favorites Garnett, Amare, and Bosh in the East, I wonder if he will get snubbed again.

Sautee

November 17th, 2010
11:03 am

Astro Joe,

If Horford wants to get to 20-10, he’d better pick it up on the rebounding side. He has a paltry 35 rebounds in his last FIVE games. At that rate, a few extra minutes is not nearly enough.

AJ, you KNOW what a Horford fan I have been. But lately his rebounding is pitiful. He’s now down to 8.8 a game, when two weeks ago he was over 10.

Pick it up, Al.

Rev in Tampa

November 17th, 2010
11:05 am

AJ, Good point about Al’s shooting percentage. Especially in light of that goosegg he put up in the first game of the season.

J from the A, I don’t think Bosh gets All-Star consideration. He is stinking it up right now. If Miami is in third place behind Orlando & Atlanta he will be the scapegoat (after the coach). To solidify Al’s position as an All-Star the Hawks should run replays of Marvin dunking on Bosh in the preseason and Rondo’s dunk last week.

Ken Strickland

November 17th, 2010
11:17 am

GRANDAD-co-sign your 11:52PM post. We saw all of the OFF variations of LDrew’s multiple OFF options, like the MOTION OFF, HIGH LOW POST, ISO and PICK AND ROLL. This is a far cry from the extremely limited and predictable ISO and jump shooting dependent OFF of the past. Our perimeter DEF has also improved. While they’re still not strong defensively, Bibby and Jamal aren’t the total DEF liabilities they’ve been in the past.

Rather than trying to cover up their DEF liabilities by employing a gimmick DEF that took away from everyone else, and was extremely easy to exploit, LDrew is holding everyone accountable and making them hold their own defensively. He’s managed to get far more production out of Bibby on both ends of the court. He’s also getting production out of JTeague, especially on DEF, and more consistency from MWilliams.

With the complete switch from the flawed DEF philosophy of the past, our Bigs are now allowed to remain with their DEF assignment, instead of being forced to defend PG’s and SG’s on the perimeter. The end result is Smoove has become the DEF force he was before Woody switched to his beloved switching DEF, and both he and Horford are now doing an excellent job of defending the basket.

What impressed me the most about last nights win was the way we stuck with our OFF down the stretch. In earlier gms when teams mounted a comeback, we’d see certain players react by reverting to ISO mode, and all ball and player movement would cease. If it makes certain fans feel better to focus on and nit pick the Hawks every flaw, whether real of imagined, then be my guest, because that can be done with every team. This team is definitely progressing under LDrew, as evidenced by the fact we’re:

1-leading he NBA in FG efficiency, which means we’re getting easier scoring opportunities,
2-getting more inside scoring opportunities, which has led to more FT opportunities,
3-playing better team ball, which has given us a chance to win every gm,
4-doing a much better job of OFF and DEF rebounding,
5-displaying and utilizing far more OFF options against double teams,
6-getting far superior perimeter and interior DEF,
7-getting positive contributions from bench players that were all but ignored,
8-establishing an identity as an uptempo, attacking the basket type of team.

All of the above were team problems before this season, and they seem to have been addressed rather quickly. The Atlanta Hawks will be a very dangerous team after the All Star break and in the playoffs.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Rev in Tampa

November 17th, 2010
11:24 am

Ken, I appreciate your pointing out that the Hawks lead the NBA in field goal efficiency becuase in every game I see blogposters complain about all the jumpshots the Hawks are taking as a part of the motion offense.

The Truth

November 17th, 2010
11:34 am

As previously mentioned, Al increased offense production on the perimeter and high PER is costing him rebounds. He just can’t be in two places at the same time. However, LD should deputized Marvin to fill the rebounding void and help Josh when Al is on the perimeter. When LD goes small and replace Marvin with either Mo or Jamal, as the case with the Pacers, Hawks will pay a rebounding price. So from game to game, LD must decide, does he wants more offense potential going small or more rebounding production with a bigger line-up.

Astro Joe

November 17th, 2010
11:53 am

Sautee, I’d like to see Al grab another 1-2 boards a game, but his rebounding rate is on par with Josh. He is only averaging 31 minutes a game after playing 35 minutes last season. The Hawks are 8-4 so it’s hard to argue that LD is hurting the team by sitting Al… but it doesn’t quite seem logical. A guy who shoots 63% is sitting on the bench because of 2 early fouls?

I just think that we’re missing the fact that Al is approaching thatrarified air of 20/10… because we’re focused on Josh’s new jump shot and because LD is wrapping Al in protective bubble-wrap too early in games.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/ATL/2011.html

JeJe

November 17th, 2010
11:55 am

Enter your comments here

Big Ray

November 17th, 2010
12:19 pm

L.D. said the Hawks wanted to make Hibbert, the league’s top shot blocker, defend a lot of pick-and-rolls. Hibbert had one blocked shot in 33 minutes. “If you play a halfcourt game and allow him to sit there he can affect the game,” L.D. said. “We wanted to get him on the move.”

I understand the strategy, but since when is Hibbert the league’s top shot blocker? That honor belongs to none other than Josh Smith, who leads in both total blocks, blocks per 48 minutes, and blocks per game. There are five guys ahead of Hibbert….

Big Ray

November 17th, 2010
12:20 pm

If you ask me, Josh Smith should be replacing Chris Bosh on the all-star team.

Bosh is now Miami’s “Marvin”, lol….

Ramon

November 17th, 2010
12:22 pm

I can understand LD taking Horford out early with 2 fouls in the 1st half. If Horford is still on the court with 2 fouls. His already average defense, will translate to below average, passive defense. He will not be able to protect the rim physically, as he needs to do. I remember a handful of times last season where Woody would leave him in with 2 fouls, and his defense would turn into a gateway for the lane. Also, every one keeps saying that we haven’t played anyone tough really. So could LD be saving Al’s energy for the play off teams? Was it not Al who MC quoted as speaking about the fatigue early in the season?

JoJo the Godfather

November 17th, 2010
12:22 pm

Big Ray, I believe Hibbert had jumped in front of Josh in total blocks going in to last night’s game.

northcyde

November 17th, 2010
12:25 pm

I just don’t want LD to act like Josh Powell deserves 15 – 20 minutes a game, while Al sits unnecessarily. And I’d like to see more of Al at PF, alongside Zaza. Drew is still feeling people out though, so it isn’t a major concern yet. But he can’t be letting Al sit vs these powerful teams, like the 2 we have coming up ( Dallas and Boston ).

And it’s nice to see Mr. Strickland back posting his words of encouragement, after making just a few appearances during the 4 game losing streak.

As of right now, the Hawks are not better than last year’s Hawks as this time. At this time last year, the Hawks were looking like a juggernaut. But in the long run, they may be ( depending on how they handle December and the 7 game road trip before and after the All-Star break ).

I’m happy to see this team handle the bad teams on the road. If they can keep doing that for the rest of the month, we may come away with a 13 – 5 record going into December.

And that’s exactly where we need to be.

JeJe

November 17th, 2010
12:32 pm

Section 303

November 17th, 2010
12:42 pm

Guys, I think some of you are missing the point on Horford’s minutes. Coach Drew has said since camp that he wants to be careful not to run starters into the ground by over playing them. Yes, Joe Johnson has had to play big minutes some games, but that was due more to injury of other players (Williams & Evans).

I don’t see why resting Al is such a bad thing. It seems like all this debate started when Michael posted a link to the article that suggested Coach Drew was taking Al out too quickly when Al picked up early fouls. Until then, no one ever talked about this.

Resting Al throughout the regular season is not a bad thing. It isn’t. It will, hopefully, serve the team well in the playoffs.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
1:06 pm

Ramon,

The question is, would you prefer Al with 2 fouls playing defense, or ZaZa playing defense?

I guess ZaZa might be a better option because at least he can commit a foul when he gets beat (and he usually does), whereas Al would have to let his go because he wouldnt want to commit his third.

vava74

November 17th, 2010
1:18 pm

Horford has been playing less minutes and being pulled in and out. That spoils rhythm and affects rebounding.

The fact is that BEFORE yesterday’s game, both Josh and Al were rebounding MORE PER MINUTE.

The “new Hibbert” is a difficult match up due to his extreme length but Al delivered when it mattered: in the 4th Quarter.

We are 8-4 with just one loss in which we were not in position to win entering the final minute.

And that was with Mo and Marvin out or severely limited (they still are).

Ramon

November 17th, 2010
1:26 pm

O’Brien in the 2nd quarter, I’d have to go with Zaza. Zaza is a good hard fouler if nothing else.

Najeh Davenpoop

November 17th, 2010
1:28 pm

“If you ask me, Josh Smith should be replacing Chris Bosh on the all-star team.”

If you ask me, he should have replaced KG last year.

The Truth

November 17th, 2010
1:33 pm

I think Twin did a nice job with the limited minutes he was on the court. It certainly spoiled the in-the-paint block party the Pacers seem to be having with their big line-up in the first half. As good as Al is offensively, there will be times when the opponents will dictate the Hawks to alter the line-up with a bigger frontline. It interesting to read bloggers questioning LD for depriving AL of minutes based on his fouls situation as if to suggest that Al is not getting his minutes-quota. If LD starts allocating minutes-quotas, he starts looking like Dark Vader Woody.

I Heart Atlanta

November 17th, 2010
1:41 pm

Roy Hibbert Missed a layup because he felt Smoove………….Good 1 lol

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
1:46 pm

MC,

Could you release my post from the blog monster. I posted one with a link, but then I tried reposting it without a link. And none of them are showing up.

The Truth

November 17th, 2010
2:03 pm

Why won’t Twin teach Al his trick of standing outside the paint and drawing his patented offensive fouls? It would certain discourage drive penetration. I’ve seen Josh draw those fouls but I’ve never seen AL draw one. This may be part of the problem when Al is at the center position. He can’t seem to keep penetration out of the paint. Josh is getting so many block shots on help defense from inbound traffic.

Ramon

November 17th, 2010
2:34 pm

The Truth, I posted a week ago on Al’s inability to draw offensive charges, or over the back fouls on rebounds. All he has to do is take an extra step when seeing the opposition drive. But instead he either tries to block out his man (when the possibility of the player missing an uncontested layup is very small) or he jumps right under the basket allowing the offensive player to get into his chest, drawing a foul on him, while still having enough momentum to finish the shot also.

~~MAC-ToWN~~ (Area Code 478 Westside Macon)

November 17th, 2010
2:44 pm

-Josh Smith is improved
-Horford is improved
-PG Defense improved (because Teague is gettin more mins)
-Motion Offense improves the team (less predictable/higher % shots)
-We’re deeper and bigger (simply because L.D. doesnt mind gettin guys like Collins off the bench when needed)

The Hawks look better prepared to handle a playoff series against an elite team this year. Atleast to the point where we should have chances to win each game, instead of gettin blown out every game.

Not to mention you just have to believe JJ will play better and we’ll probably make a significant move to improve the team even more before that time of year

Section 303

November 17th, 2010
2:47 pm

Najeh, I agree. Josh should have replaced KG last year. Josh is having a great year. Looking forward to seeing him eat up KG.

And…I have to give that guy Scott credit. I haven’t seen him post here since yesterday, but he called it. Hibbert is much improved. Not as good as Al, but way better than last year. Hibbert is a player these days. I learned that lesson watching last night.

superiorblogman

November 17th, 2010
3:05 pm

This team still needs a trade. Don’t forget the big picture which is getting to Eastern Conference Finals atleast. Jamal is okay but we still could use another good size SF, 6″7 and up, a defensive minded Center that deserves minutes, and a upgrade at the PG position. I am not like you inferior bloggers that whine and moan after every lost and think everything is okay after every win. The big picture is that this team is a playoff team that will struggle to get out of round 1 as currently structured.

Astro Joe

November 17th, 2010
3:13 pm

Only the elite usually get 3 All-Stars in a given game. If the Hawks want to get 3 guys in the February game, they will need to start beating quality teams and beat them resoundly about the head and neck. Beating up on the T’Wolves & Pistons ain’t likely going to get 3 Hawks on the squad.

The Truth

November 17th, 2010
3:13 pm

superiorblogman

Are you a bigot?

Eric

November 17th, 2010
4:42 pm

On a semi-unrelated note, who wants to see the Heat lose tonight? I know I do. Hopefully the Heat, Celtics, and Bulls all lose tonight to help us out in the standings. There’s a pretty good chance that the Spurs will defeat the Bulls, and a fair chance that the Suns have a shot at beating Miami, but Washington beating the Celtics is highly unlikely. Crazier things have happened though.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
4:59 pm

In other news, Eva Longoria is soon to be a free agent.

From espn.com;

LOS ANGELES — Eva Longoria has filed for divorce from Tony Parker, citing irreconcilable differences..

Maybe she really didnt want to be in San Antonio after all.

lewis

November 17th, 2010
6:36 pm

lol she was waiting on that contract extension

Ken Strickland

November 17th, 2010
7:21 pm

REV IN TAMPA-some so called fans are so desperate to trash LDrew, selected players, and the team overall, they either refuse, or are unable to see the increase in OFF efficiency, in number of open jumpers, FT attempts, as well as OFF and DEF rebounding. It’s like JEJE specifically singling out the 3gm home losing streak to try and point out the teams alledged lack of progress.

His negative minded way of processing things wouldn’t allow him to process or mention the 4gm road winning streak and/or our 5-1 road record, because it wouldn’t support his negative minded paradigm. There are people who still waste time trying to convince anyone stupid enough to listen that All Star center AHorford is the teams weakness and needs to be traded.

There are also those who insist JSmith is immature, shoots too many jumpers and should be traded, or is better suited to play SF, even though he may currently be the NBA’s best PF. I can’t wait to see how we do against the Celtics, who have become older, slower, and less athletic, while we’ve gotten quicker, faster, deeper and more athletic. This yr, that vaunted Celtic DEF will have to stop an entire OFF, rather than one or two players dominating the ball.

Last yr at this time we were 10-2 rather than 8-4, but we had the benefit of playing more home gms during that stretch. The majority of our next group of gms will be played on the road, which means we should have a home friendly schedule during our stretch run to the playoffs. I really like this team, and the fact we can win, especially on the road, without JJ or Jamal having big gms.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
7:50 pm

Ken Strickland,

While I agree about the offensive efficiency, assists etc., I dont think you can mention rebounding as an improvement.

The Hawks currently rank 22nd in rebounding in the league. That’s unacceptable.

But I like the progress they have made, especially on the road. We can see that they have the confidence that they can win games on the road. They did not have that road confidence last year.

Also, I wouldnt think the game against the old Celtics should not be too much of a barometer, because we went 4-0 against the Celtics last year, so what kind of progress are you looking for against the Celtics?

Winning by a larger margin?

The progress I am looking for, (which we have seen signs of), is winning on the road, playing much better against Orlando, and more consistent effort (especially on defense) night in, and night out.

So far, the biggest issues to me, are rebounding and the same inconsistencies we saw last year (especially on defense).

But I have confidence in LD that he will continue to preach and teach, so hopefully the players will continue to buy in, and continue to work on their game.

O'Brien

November 17th, 2010
7:53 pm

Najeh,

I know this is Hawks blog, but comments on the Braves blog tend to get lost in the shuffle.

I’m surprised you’re not a big a fan of the Uggla trade (especially if we only have him for one season).

I know that his defense and strikeouts are a big issue, but it’s hard to argue with 30HR, 30 doubles, and 90 RBIs, which he has basically averaged for the last 5 seasons.

And having him behind Chipper will force pitchers to give Chipper something to hit.

And if we lose Uggla next year, we will get a draft pick from whoever signs him, and a supplemental pick as well (assuming Uggla lives up to his averages).

Infante will be a free agent after this season, so it’s also possible he might have been with us one more year too. And he was coming off a career year, so I think selling high is the way to go.

Even if Uggla is a one year rental, I like the move a lot.

Grandad

November 17th, 2010
8:05 pm

O’Brien & Lewis:

Parker cheated on her.
Only thing I can figure is…..
Tiger must be TP’s mentor?

lewis

November 17th, 2010
8:06 pm

its stupid because you know Bosh is going to get all star votes because of this espn game. he’s abusing channing frye’s weak a$$ D

Grandad

November 17th, 2010
8:09 pm

O’Brien

Uggie will sign an ext and retire a Brave.
[only a prediction] of course.
I’m a huge Braves fan & this was a masterful pick-up!

~~MAC-ToWN~~ (Area Code 478 Westside Macon)

November 17th, 2010
9:17 pm

will they get an outfield bat now though??
and I wonder how Freeman will do at first…..he is going to be the starter next year right???

lewis

November 17th, 2010
9:47 pm

From Etan’s Blog:

Last week after meeting with the NBA CEOs, David Stern suggested cutting at least $750 million in player salaries (more than a one third reductio). Does he really think this is something Billy Hunter would ever agree to?

No, of course he doesn’t. His 1-3 FG on 5 min played has cost the Hawks $178,999.90 so far. Does he even dress out regularly?

Section 303

November 17th, 2010
9:59 pm

Guys,

Watching the Mavs/Hornets game. If you have League Pass, check it out. They played on Monday, I watched, great game. Tonight’s looking like another good finish.

lewis

November 17th, 2010
10:02 pm

spurs / bulls aint too shabby

lewis

November 17th, 2010
11:03 pm

when complaining about Al not being a true center,
remember this: Greg Oden is officially out for the season. 2nd time in 4 years.

drmaryb

November 17th, 2010
11:45 pm

Bustin’ Loose!

lewis

Oden is a Buster and a Bust! reminiscent of Sam Bowie taken ahead of MJ by Portland and now Oden taken ahead of Durant! OKC must be saying whew! Thank God, we had the second pick or we would have been stuck with Oden.

is it me? or does Oden look like he’s 98 years old? does he have that aging disease? Thank the Lawd, we got Horford with that 3rd pick, or we may have ended up with Oden too!

he Gone Fishin’ already?

Big Ump

November 17th, 2010
11:48 pm

drmaryb

Bustin loose! That was Rick James all the way.

Najeh Davenpoop

November 18th, 2010
12:10 am

“I’m surprised you’re not a big a fan of the Uggla trade (especially if we only have him for one season).”

I freely admit I don’t know nearly as much about baseball as I do about football or basketball (and I don’t pretend to be an expert on those either) but my main objection to the Uggla trade was because I didn’t know Infante’s contract was also expiring. I was under the impression that many years of Infante (who is more than just the utility man David O’Brien and Jeff Schultz are trying to make him appear to be) were being traded for one year of Uggla. I still haven’t seen any convincing evidence that the Braves are going to pony up the cash to keep Uggla long term, but if both are pending free agents my opposition to the deal decreases significantly.

Not a huge fan of the defense getting even weaker and another strikeout machine being added to the lineup, but if he produces like 2010 and not like 2009 or 2007, the Braves are going to benefit.

All that said, though, I think Freeman is the key to whether or not the Braves take a step forward next season. If he can start producing at the level some think he will, I think the Braves should be back in the playoffs.

~~MAC-ToWN~~ (Area Code 478 Westside Macon)

November 18th, 2010
4:06 am

That’s true….we could have been suck with Oden lol. Here in Hawks’ country we tend to focus too much on the negative (at times myself included) but we hardly ever talk about the positive.

We talk about Marvin over CP3. Well atleast we got Horford over Oden.
This year the theme is that we havent beaten a playoff team, buy ya know what? We also havent LOST to a non-playoff team or bad team.

Even Boston, Orlando, Chicago, Milwaukee, and Miami cant say that as they have all dropped games to atleast 1 sub-par team.

~~MAC-ToWN~~ (Area Code 478 Westside Macon)

November 18th, 2010
4:06 am

O'Brien

November 18th, 2010
7:18 am

One guy I wanted to see interviewed this offseason, was Thibodeau, the defensive guru behind the Celtics.

Thibodeau’s Bulls gave up 37 third quarter points and 29 fourth quarter points to the Spurs (after giving up 37 the entire first half).

I guess coaches can’t do it on their own, no matter the scheme. They need the right players.

With Oden out for the season again, I can’t help but feel bad for Blazers fans. After taking Sam Bowie over MJ (which is understandable, because they already had Clyde Drexler), Bowie never lived up to the hype (partly due to injuries), while MJ went on to become MJ.

And now, they draft Oden (which is understandable, since he was the next star center), and who will have played 82 games in 4 seasons, over KD, who has been a scoring champ, and a gold medal winner on Team USA.

I know BK was horrible in drafting Marvin over CP3 or Deron, but at least Marvin contributes in some way (although he’s still not consistent enough).

And BK was horrible in drafting Shelden over Roy and anybody else. But at least Shelden was part of the deal to get Bibby.

I feel bad for Oden too. Seems like a good guy, but injuries have ruined his career before it even got started.

terrell

November 18th, 2010
8:22 am

Obrien, if Bowie over Jordan is understandable because they already had Clyde, then Sheldon over Roy or Gay has to be understandable cause we already had Joe and Marvin. Keep it real now. lol!

doc

November 18th, 2010
9:33 am

uggla is a masterful pick up if it doesnt turn out to be texiera. it already smells better because less was given up and not a desperation move. if grandad is right and he is signed at a reasonable deal then it is real cool unless the all star we traded blossoms even further and stays cost efficient. najeh’s point about his defensive liabilites are huge on a team that has quality pitching as its goal but no over powering guys but guys who depend on defense. dont make a pitcher feel he has to strike everyone out and ground balls are not good. in the end if they improve and he signs then it is great. if he is a borrowed player like so many before and the two guys blossom like we have now seen in st louis with wainright and several in texas then we have been taken.

back to bball. nice work MC.

ILL-Logical

November 18th, 2010
9:35 am

Big Ump

November 17th, 2010
11:48 pm
drmaryb

Bustin loose! That was Rick James all the way.

Try Chuck Brown and the Soulsearchers,who are still go-going by the way.

JeJe

November 18th, 2010
9:41 am

FIRE RICK SUND

NOT COMPILING A CHAMPIONSHIP ROSTER WHEN U COULD’VE

DID NOTHING THIS OFFSEASON

O'Brien

November 18th, 2010
9:49 am

terrell,

To be fair, the presence of Marvin and JJ did not affect the drafting of Shelden.

Instead, the presence of Marvin led to us not drafting Rudy Gay, and the presence of JJ led to us not drafting Brandon Roy. But the Hawks needed frontcourt help, and Shelden was supposed help.

Taking hindsight out of it, I was ok with drafting Shelden. What I didnt like was (allegedly), BK made a promise to Shelden that he would take him at #5, and as a result, BK was unable to trade down. Nobody had Shelden rated that highly.

If BK had traded down from 5th and taken Shelden at 13th, I would have had no issues with that.

*Again, taking hindsight out of it, because if they have a Do-over draft, Shelden would not get drafted in the first round, and might not even get drafted.

O'Brien

November 18th, 2010
9:59 am

Doc,

This is nothing like the Tex trade, based on who we gave up. Infante is a solid player, with good defense and plays multiple positions, but probably will not develop into a 30HR, 90 RBI guy.

And the reliever (although solid), will probably not develop into an all-star closer.

I am concerned about our team defense though. Hopefully nobody hits the ball to him.

doc

November 18th, 2010
10:13 am

o’b i understand that and said it. my point if it is one and done it doesnt work on any level if that is what this turns out to be. unless you are projecting losing him and having the home runs in freeman and heywood, saying it wont matter then fine. we gave up wainright for that one year guy we couldnt sign and didnt get the return and he has been huge going forward. the tex deal i mentioned was desperate and almost denegrates schuerholz’s name for the one who got taken on that. thumbs up if it is for several years, he is a ballplayer. the trade is from strength if we really have a bench guy to pick up the chipper pieces.

doc

November 18th, 2010
10:23 am

o’b fair comments on the shels thing. i wasnt uncomfortable with the concept because we needed help at that position and we knew basg in court was not going to go out and buy a worthy big. yes, to have traded down and maybe gotten more for shels was the way to go instead of sending out messages everywhere he was our guy which didnt make sense. it was a poor year for bigs that year though milsaps came that year in the second round. he might have been the best of the bunch. we made up for the bad luck that year in getting good luck to have al h fall in our lap so it kind of worked out. interesting shels doesnt seem to be embarrassing himself in denver at 900 grand a year. a very reasonable investment.

Ken Strickland

November 18th, 2010
10:39 am

OBRIEN-your point is well taken. But my point about rebounding better relates to critical points during a gm where we are doing a much better job of getting key OFF and DEF rebounds. Teams that are known for their strong rebounding, like the Grizzles, and are ranked at of near the top of the NBA in that catagory, haven’t been able to dominate us on the boards. I see that as an improvement in our ability to rebound.

Why do people insist on blaming BK for not drafting CP3 or DWilliams when Woodson was the one that opposed drafting either, and publically stated his doubts about their abilitity to succeed as NBA PG’s? Woodson didn’t want any rookie PG running his team, or even on his team for that matter, and he demonstrated that repeatedly. Woodson was an extremely poor judge of talent, especially when it came to guards, and allowed his preference for veterans, and personal bias against rookies and younger guards, to influence the way he dealt with them.

While BK certainly missed on SWilliams, I understand what he was trying to do when he drafted him. We already had JJ on board, and we desperately needed more size, rebounding and interior DEF, so logically Shelden was a more logical pick than BRoy. As it turned out, BK was mistaken in thinking Shelden could duplicate his college success and give the team all of the above. However, Shelden wasn’t a total loss or failure. When given consistent mins and opportunity, he proved he could be a consistent rebounder and contributor.

But Woodson, for some unknown reason, had a bad habit of shutting down rookies and younger players, that weren’t starters, after they produce when given adequate mins. Fans seem to forget the 2week stretch where Shelden got consistent mins due to injuries, and earned PLAYER OF THE WEEK HONORS and was runner up the following wk. After that, Woodson acted like it never happened and didn’t give him consistent mins again.

There was obviously a big difference of opinion between BK and Woodson on a number of things, and who should be drafted was certainly one of them. In the end, it created a big rift between the two, and caused BK to try and fire him on several occasions, which ultimately led to his dismissal. I guess Woodson now knows how it feels to have the ASG turn its back on you and send you packing for being too stubborn and insisting on doing things your way.

Rufus1

November 18th, 2010
11:54 am

How Luck makes a man a GENUIS..(ODEN)

OKC was lucky enough to NOT get the 1st pick in the draft, so KDurant fell into their lap. KD becomes a transendant players, while ODEN is a shattered windshield.

OKC has become a model franchise in the NBA and our held as a GOLD STANDARD on how to build a franchise…ALL because their were LUCKY.

People seem to forget that Billy Knight and ASG has drafted 2 potenial Allstars(AL and Josh), trade for a 4 time allstar(JOE) and laid the foundation for a perrenial playoff team…..BUT THE HAWKS GET NO LOVE!

People forget that OKC was one of the worst franchises in the(Seattle Supersonics) NBA before they were LUCKY enough to get the 2 pick(KDurant).

If the Hawks were LUCKY enough to get the 2nd pick and OKC had any other pick, they would still be the Sonics, BK would still be the GM and the Hawks would be the GOLD STANDARD in the league.

FUNNY HOW LUCK CAN CHANGE PERCEPTION….

The Truth

November 18th, 2010
12:12 pm

Watching NBA Game-Time; I’ve been really impressed with Greg Anthony prospective and game analysis. His evaluation of players and talent seem to always be on-point. I think he could do a better GM job than Sund. He certainly couldn’t do any worst. If the Hawks season falls extremely below expectation, than the next affordable upgrade would be the GM job. If Anthony has GM aspiration and the timing is right, Why Not? I keep forgetting though that this probably would make too much sense for the ASG.

Melvin

November 18th, 2010
12:59 pm

Looks like AC Law will have to find yet another team. I watched Memphis rookie PG Greivis Vasquez play the other night and this kid looks promising….

http://blogs.commercialappeal.com/the_memphis_edge/2010/11/acie-laws-days-with-the-grizzlies-be-numbered.html

Section 303

November 18th, 2010
1:09 pm

The Truth, I like Anthony, too. He does a good job and seems to know more about the league than just the happenings with the Lakers, Celtics, or Heat.

GM? I don’t know….I don’t know if I’m ready to go that far. But, it would be interesting.

Najeh Davenpoop

November 18th, 2010
1:13 pm

“If the Hawks were LUCKY enough to get the 2nd pick and OKC had any other pick, they would still be the Sonics, BK would still be the GM and the Hawks would be the GOLD STANDARD in the league.”

Interesting way of putting it, since the flip side is that the pick used on Horford was top 3 protected, and if the Hawks had ended up with pick 4 or lower it would have gone to Phoenix to complete the Joe Johnson trade, practically ensuring that the Hawks wouldn’t have made the playoffs that year and that BK would have been fired following that season regardless.

Najeh Davenpoop

November 18th, 2010
1:41 pm

“I am concerned about our team defense though. Hopefully nobody hits the ball to him.”

This is the problem though — the Braves have two starters for whom ground balls are their bread and butter, and we already saw in the playoffs how crucial the 2B position is for the ground ball oriented pitchers on the Braves. Really, other than Freeman and Heyward, it’s safe to say every other position is going to be average at best defensively, and while that is OK when you have power pitchers who rely on K’s, it is asking for trouble when your staff relies on ground balls.

Again, if they are getting last year’s .870 OPS, .287 hitter, the defensive downgrade can be overlooked. If they are getting 2009’s .800 OPS, .240 hitter with more K’s than hits, I have my doubts.

Freshmaker

November 18th, 2010
2:04 pm

Wonder if the Hawks will try and make a run at Greg Oden at season’s end. He’ll be a UFA since Portland did not offer him an extension. Obviously he’s VERY injury prone, as he’s only played in 82 of 328 possible games, but still. Might be worth a gamble.

lewis

November 18th, 2010
2:09 pm

Interesting tidbits from Bret Lagree over at hoopinion,

4) Joe Johnson’s defensive measurables are poor, the reasons why murky.

For the third straight season, the Hawks are allowing more points when Joe Johnson’s on the court than when he’s off the court.

Johnson On Off Diff
2008-09 108.3 103.3 -5.0
2009-10 108.3 103.9 -4.4
2010-11 109.5 101.5 -8.0

There are three possible explanations for this each of which is convincing to some degree:

1) The unrealistic defensive assignments Johnson draws because of the deficiencies of his teammates.
2) The amount of time Johnson plays with the second unit.
3) Johnson is a below average defensive player.

5) Larry Drew has done a good job of spotting Jason Collins.

Collins has played just 5 offensive and 4 defensive possessions without at least one of Josh Smith or Al Horford playing alongside him and the Hawks were outscored 6-2 in that setting.

* With both Smith and Horford on the court with Collins, the Hawks have outscored opponents 102-70.
* With just Smith and Collins on the court, the Hawks have outscored opponents 47-34.
* With just Horford and Collins on the court, the Hawks have outscored opponents 15-6.

Section 303

November 18th, 2010
2:11 pm

Freshmaker, I hope not. After the organization blew tons of cash on Speedy Claxton (not that Oden is a piece of trash like Speedy), it would be hard to spend dough on another walking injury (though, at least Oden’s injuries are real and not faked).

My question is: When Oden does sign (or re-sign) with a team, how much will he net? With the CBA he might be screwed.

Ken Strickland

November 18th, 2010
2:27 pm

I’d like to get everyone’s opinion on the Kings offering 6′11″ 250lb backup C Jason Thompson for PG JTeague, which the Hawks turned down. Also, it appears the Nets LITTLE GENENAL(HC AJohnson) doesn’t like TMurphy, and he’s on the trading block.

DOC-If the Braves sign Oggla to an extension, that means the trade was made with the future in mind. So far, CJones’ rehab and intent for the future, has everything tied up, but look for Uggla to end up as Chippers replacement at 3B and Prado to end up back at 2nd base. We’d have a very productive infield, and one that would be solid defensively, with Uggla-3B, Prado-2B, Gonzalez-SS and Freeman-1B.

Freshmaker

November 18th, 2010
2:31 pm

@Section 303: I dunno, it will be interesting to see how much he’s offered. Someone will surely make a run at him. The SI article I read said that Portland was unlikely to even give Oden a qualifying offer of ~8.5M, so I would assume he’d make less than that. I don’t know what a fair offer would be given his circumstances, but he’s a 7 footer with a world of talent that could be had without trading away anyone. If we end up not resigning JC1 we’d have some funds available, right? Obviously we wouldn’t offer anything near what Jamal’s making.

Freshmaker

November 18th, 2010
2:35 pm

@Ken: I’d be really hesitant to trade away Teague. He’s a very quick PG that we should give a little more time to to allow him to develop. Coach Drew said on 680 the Fan this morning that Teague was by far the quickest guy on the team. Unless we get a proven guy I really don’t want to give him up (though granted I don’t know anything about Thompson).

Ken Strickland

November 18th, 2010
2:57 pm

FRESHMAKER-my sentiments exactly. While Teague has yet to find himself offensively, he’s been an invaluable contributor defensively. His DEF is the main reason we haven’t been distroyed by opposing PG’s, which occurred routinely last yr. In fact, he and Bibby have formed a pretty productive 1-2 punch, with the combination providing us with quality OFF and DEF.

I took a look at our schedule for the next 3months, and the remainder of this month, and it’s a good thing we’ve learned to win on the road, and here’s why:
NOV-3@-3VS
DEC-9@-8VS with 6 back to backs
JAN–8@-6VS with 5 back to backs
FEB–8@-4VS with 3 back to backs and 5 consecutive rd gms.

How we handle this stretch will determine how much we’ve improved and how competitive we’ll be come playoff time.

Section 303

November 18th, 2010
3:03 pm

Freshmaker, off topic, but I am firmly in favor of bringing Jamal Crawfor back. I just like watching the guy play. He handles the ball better then anyone I have ever seen. Someone like myself, who always struggled with dribbling during their playing days, I love watching him when he just starts shaking his defender. It’s great stuff!

Grandad

November 18th, 2010
3:13 pm

For Ken Strickland: [@ 2:27 pm]

A variance from the conventional KS post.

I would be opposed to a Teaguer fo Thompson trade.
Teaguer = a need.
Thompson = redundancy, (although talented to some degree)
[also not a shot-blocking-rim-defender]
* Question, why is SAC-town, suddenly in a mood to trade Thmpsn?

I have always liked Troy Murphy.
Still do.
He fits perfectly with LD’s offense + he rebounds.
I’ve been working *feverishly on a trade (trade machine),
salaries are tricky unless we just do a Jamal for TM straight up.
*I really have been testing it on trade machine,
and I really do have a slight temp,
so I really have been working on it feverishly. ahem!

Side Note:
[prediction] = Uggie re-signs & retires a Brave.

Freshmaker

November 18th, 2010
4:45 pm

@Section 303: Totally agreed! JC1 almost always seems to provide an offensive spark when we need it. I hope we are able to bring him back. I don’t know how much to read into us not extending his contract in the offseason. Dude is money though.

yodaddy

November 18th, 2010
4:47 pm

Shelden Williams was truly disappointing when he got to the league.

he could do everything in college against quality teams. Rebound, score and convincingly block shots plus he was strong as an ox. I remember him dominating Tyrus Thomas and Big Baby in the tournament (too bad the rest of the team no showed).

When he got to the league it seemed like he lost all talent. Scoring went down which is almost always the case but his staple of defense and rebounding went down as well plus he was getting pushed around on the block. He became a bonafide scrub. I know he was on the Celtics last year but is he still in the league???

As far as Jeff Teague for Jason Thompson….no way. Why do we need another 6-10 power forward??? Especially one as thin as Jason Thompson when we have 6 PFs/Cs on the team and only 2 PGs???? Just makes absolutely no sense. If Teague can channel his college self (which was aggression) then he can be a starting caliber point guard.

Jordan Crawford for Jason Thompson makes a little more sense. We have 3 SGs ahead of Crawford (meaning he’s not playing) and then maybe Powell and Thompson can share minutes.

Big Ump

November 18th, 2010
4:53 pm

ILL Logical

You right on the money. It were Chuck Brown. Rick James hooks was bustin out L 7. Ill them was the days. Ken S, and Obrien, The trade that the braves pull off was a good one. It will help them more then It would hurt them.

Raymond

November 18th, 2010
4:59 pm

Just a quick thought. After watching so many Hawks games last years where analysts would talk about other team’s schooling the Hawks and picking apart our defense with ball movement, it’s really refreshing to know that we are now the ones who are picking apart defenses with our ball movement. I like this trend.

Lyle

November 18th, 2010
5:21 pm

Here’s something that really caught my eye recently:

Al Horford currently leads the league in field goal percentage at 63.7%. Considering he is averaging 17.2 ppg, that’s very, very impressive.

The Truth

November 18th, 2010
5:30 pm

Send the Hawks to Hollywood. Vote for all 6 players for All-Stars including Marvin William :)

http://www.nba.com/hawks/vote/2011.html

drmaryb

November 18th, 2010
5:35 pm

Super Freak!

What’s up Big Ump? Yeah baby, these kids don’t know nothing about Rick James and Tina Marie! That’s too much – “Fire and Desire” for these youngins’ … lol …

Yeah, Luck is a funny thing!
Luck also happens when hard work meets opportunity … that is the only Lucky formula that has ever worked for me. I saw this TV Show: The Curse of the Lottery, the other day and I was thinking, dang! I wish the Lottery would curse me! These loser winners were riding around with $80k dollars in their cars, getting robbed and smoking crack and meth>

They weren’t cursed, they were stupid! Show me that money, and I promise yall, I may be smoking some crack, but it won’t be on a glass pipe! lol for reel!

I’ve been extremely quiet about the Hawks so far, because, after all the speculation, there is finally some things on tape, that I can maul over and analyze now. I am just eating popcorn and sipping on my cherry coke. After 20 games, I will have a report. It’s just too early for me to tell what’s going on right now. I need to see some consistency.

So far, J-Smoove has been very impressive! The outside jumper, defense and energy have been outstanding thus far. Of all the players in the league, Josh has benefited the most from the “Respect The Game” rule. More and More, Josh is getting back on defense to make the next play. Al Horford’s jumper has been lights-out and stellar. Joe is sharing the ball and Jamal is slowly coming around to be more involved. He needs to remember he is still under contract for 10.8M and Jamal still needs to earn that money. That is a lot of money and respect right there!

Coach Drew is like a rudder on a big boat, steady and guiding. And, unseen.

Let’s Go Hawks!

Shane

November 18th, 2010
7:05 pm

Just out of curiosity, does anyone think that the Suns have a legitimate shot at beating the Magic tonight? I would love to see the Suns defeat the Magic tonight to propel Atlanta into first place in the southeast division, however, I, personally, doubt that the Suns will be able to pull out a win against a team that is basically better than them at everything they do, including shooting the 3-ball. With basically no interior presence, and no real interior post defender (unless you think Channing Frye is a good post defender), I think the Suns may struggle big time against Dwight, and be forced to double team him, thereby giving up lots of open looks to Orlando’s shooters. At any rate, it should be fun to watch.

Ramon

November 18th, 2010
7:14 pm

Ken, for a week I had been lobbying for a deal that involved Thompson. But you can’t trade your only backup PG for a backup PF. If the Kings included their young pg in the deal, then that would be feasible. While today, Thompson is a much better player than Teague. He wouldn’t be more valuable than Teague. Now if JC1 was traded to Philly for the rumored package that included Lou Williams, than maybe you could turn and send Teague to Sac for Thompson.

Ramon

November 18th, 2010
7:15 pm

I wonder what’s the price tag for Aaron Brooks right now.

Hawks Fan In New Orleans

November 18th, 2010
7:42 pm

I am a youngster and I knew about Rick James prior to Chappelle Show.
AND I BET YOU DIDN’T KNOW THAT, EBONY EYES!
Well I am encouraged by the Bibby and Teague tandem/platoon, josh Smith’s continued evolution, Horford’s ascent to the 20-10 class of players and Drew’s cool, yet steady approach to coaching this squad. Dallas is great test of mettle. Its time to start shutting down these playoff teams and make some noise.

Samuel

November 18th, 2010
7:48 pm

he’s been an invaluable contributor defensively. His DEF is the main reason we haven’t been distroyed by opposing PG’s,

How in the hel_ can you make such a stupid statement. Dude plays freekin 15 minutes a game. WOW!! I’ve heard it all.

ignition

November 18th, 2010
8:00 pm

Since people here talk about trades so much how bout this no brainer…
Marvin + Jamal to Denver for Carmelo ???
Sounds easy enough to me… Why not ???

Big Ump

November 18th, 2010
8:06 pm

drmaryb

If you hit that lottery don’t forget about me. I’m the one who will be totin your luggage and driving you around the world. You right some people can’t handle money. Imngine having that kind of money and in the next 5 to 6 years you broke.

O'Brien

November 18th, 2010
9:07 pm

Ken,

Regardless of Woody’s insistence against CP3 and Deron, BK is the GM and the boss of Woody. BK answered directly to ownership.

If you make a recommendation at work, and your boss chooses to listen to you, but your recommendation fails in the end, whose fault is it?

Yours? or your boss, because he chose to listen to you, his employee?

J from the A

November 18th, 2010
9:08 pm

All Star voting has begun … make sure to vote for your favorite Hawks players!

drmaryb

November 18th, 2010
9:44 pm

Big Ump!

Child Please! You will be riding shot-gun in the back of my white stretch limo. We’ll hire someone to tote our bags! When I eat, you eat – baby! Just get me some of those back-stage passes and we’ll party like a white-boy! lol!

I’m starting to drink that Jeff Teague kool-aid myself! He shows flashes of brilliance and John Wall speed! I wish he would fly down the court every time he gets the ball – why not?
Can you imagine Josh, Marvin and Horford filling the wings on a Teague fast-break?

Dang! That would be something to see!

Samuel

November 18th, 2010
9:50 pm

According to all the “Woody Haters”, the regular season means nothing. According to the “Woody Haters” he should have disregarded the regular season and played Jeff Teague regardless of the fact that he was lost on the court on defense, turned the ball over constantly and could not shoot.

Fast forward to the slick talking LD and what do you know. JC2 is glued to the bench, Jeff Teague is playing 15 minutes a game. We have the 3rd best record in the conference against teams who likely will be fishing come March and April. So what has changed?

By the way Ken:
Teagues (+/-) numbers against playoff teams
PHX-(-6)
ORL-(-11)
MIL-(-6)
UTA-(0)

Bibby
PHX-(0)
ORL-(+10)
MIL-(-3)
UTA-(+2)

Really, he’s playing too much according to those numbers.

MsDee

November 18th, 2010
10:37 pm

@O’Brien..

You said, “Regardless of Woody’s insistence against CP3 and Deron, BK is the GM and the boss of Woody. BK answered directly to ownership.

If you make a recommendation at work, and your boss chooses to listen to you, but your recommendation fails in the end, whose fault is it?

Yours? or your boss, because he chose to listen to you, his employee?”

Although you are right, the GM IS the boss of Woody and ultimately paid the price, BUT you also want to be able to TRUST YOUR EMPLOYEES as well, esp when that employee SPECIFICALLY asks for NO ROOKIE PG’S!! Just like Mike Smith of the Falcons often places HIS TRUST on Matt Ryan to go for the 4th down conversions in a tight game, Billy Knight WANTED to trust Woody as well since he WAS the head coach and new what kind of game plans in had in store for his team. Woody thought he knew what he wanted but in reality, he didnt know NOTHING AT ALL!!

Mike is back

November 18th, 2010
11:06 pm

drmaryb, I hear ya on the Dang…and rise you one. lol

I too have had flashes of what it would look like with Teague pushing the ball, and Josh and Al filling the lane…Dude made some sick passes on the break…in his brief stint last season…I WANT TO SEE SOME MORE OF THAT.

Samuel, what’s up dawg…make yo woody haters…yo motivators. CMON Man…LD is one of Woody’s boys…Surely, you can give Dude some support. lol

Hey, I like Woody too…now that he is no longer coaching the Hawks…I like even better. See…It’s a lot bloggers that loooooooooooove Woody now. heh heh

GO LD, AND GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Najeh Davenpoop

November 18th, 2010
11:18 pm

“Really, he’s playing too much according to those numbers.”

If Magic Johnson was playing all his minutes with Zaza and Josh Powell on the floor his plus/minus would be negative too.

Mike is back

November 18th, 2010
11:26 pm

Samuel, BTW it nice see ole Solo the other night…Woody made a man. I always liked ole Solo. You got a lot to be proud of dawg…yo boy efforts…weren’t in vain.

Aint gon even hit u with a GO LD on this one…I’m ma just say GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol

Big Ump

November 18th, 2010
11:32 pm

drmaryb

I haven’t forgot about the passes for you. Right now the girls hoping to do something with the group Pretty Ricky when they go on tour. We will have some local performances begining the end of this month. I got you covered.

doc

November 19th, 2010
1:35 am

ken s prado will be at third and uggla at second if and when the time comes. he has never played anything but second and wren and gonzalez have stated as much. if chipper is back, prado goes to where he plays in winter ball, left field. i can only hope the chipper saga ends smoothly so they can sign the guy to a longterm contract.

yo shels is starting on the denver nuggets.

Ramon

November 19th, 2010
1:51 am

Hey guys, the All Star Ballot is up now on nba.com. Please lets support the Hawks this season.

Ken Strickland

November 19th, 2010
2:14 am

OBRIEN-The fact that management wouldn’t allow BK to fire Woodson, and gave him the contract extension rather than BK, proves Woodson had more decision making power than previously thought. BK wanted to play an uptempo style of OFF and wanted an uptempo type of PG to make it happen. Woodson wanted a much slower half court oriented style and wanted a veteran PG to run his OFF no matter what.

That’s why past their prime veteran PG’s like TLue, AJohnson, SClaxton, when he was able, and MBibby, got heavy mins even if they lacked speed, quickness, penetrating and/or shooting ability, or the ability to play DEF. If it was BK’s decision, rather than Woodson’s, not to draft CP3 or DWilliams, then why would Woodson feel the need to publically state his doubts about the abilitity of either player to be successful at the NBA level?

Samuel

November 19th, 2010
6:47 am

Mike,
LD is doing a good job. He was a business decision and right now it’s paying off. All he has to do is “make it” to the second round. Otherwise, we took a step backwards to save $$$. We still have zero chance of making it to the ECF or winning a ring though but he is doing a good job beating “scrubbs”>

O'Brien

November 19th, 2010
8:54 am

Ken,

I think Woody deserves some of the blame, but BK and ownership take some of the blame too. I think we give Woody too much blame at times when the blame should be shared with GM and ownership.

We say Woody wanted Bibby, ZaZa and Marvin back. And he did.

But ultimately, it was up to Sund to resign them, at a certain salary, for a certain number of years. Because even if the coach leaves, the GM still has to deal with the players that remain after the coach is long gone.

Just like now, Woody is gone, but we still have Marvin, Bibby and ZaZa on payroll.

Mike is back

November 19th, 2010
9:16 am

Yeah, I know you got a soft spot for LD too. But the reality is…We still would have had the same chance of making it to the ECF, or winning a ring…with Woody too…especially with our payroll.

At some point we will have to breach the luxury tax threshold to get to ECF, or win a ring. They got Al resigned in a timely manner…THAT made me happy…so I want belabor that point.

It is what it is…However, you to have to admit… it’s refreshing to hear an Hawks coach stressing the fundamentals of basketball. LD is right…these guys are professional…they should be held accountable for what they due on both ends of the court.

If LD can get our guys to consistently give maximum effort on both ends of the court…I would hardly consider that a step backwards.

The Truth

November 19th, 2010
10:07 am

Ken,

My two cents

“The fact that management wouldn’t allow BK to fire Woodson, and gave him the contract extension rather than BK, proves Woodson had more decision making power than previously thought.”

This is true, certainly validated that he had more influence than perhaps most of us thought.

“BK wanted to play an uptempo style of OFF and wanted an uptempo type of PG to make it happen. Woodson wanted a much slower half court oriented style and wanted a veteran PG to run his OFF no matter what.”

I’m not so sure there was a clash of style difference between BK and Woody. Actually they both wanted a veteran PG which naturally created problems since a good one wasn’t easily acquired. During that time, perhaps Speedy was the best available veteran PG on the market with championship credentials. Obviously his injury problems went undetected but during his hay-days with the Spurs, he was known as an effective penetrating PG that loves to break-down defenses by getting in the paint. I wouldn’t necessarily call Speedy a slow half court oriented style PG when he was “on his game.” If you’re just talking about a “fast break” opportunity Speedy would push the ball and initiate opportunities for his teammates. On the other hand, Bibby plays the PG position much like a tweener SG so his tendency is not to breakdown defenses but to spot-up for the long threes. He would be more in the mode of a “slower half court oriented style” you are referring as well as TLue and AJohnson. But BK pursuit of these of these players had more to do with their availability than their style IMO.

If Woody wanted a “slower half court oriented style” PG, he certainly contradicted himself when he drafted Jeff Teague because that was certainly his choose.

N.D.T.K.A.

November 19th, 2010
11:12 am

Love the balance on offense with LD’s new system. Teague has to play better if Bibby is too be a trade piece this summer with an expiring contract. Bibby is playing better so far but is still lacking defensively. Can’t trade Jamal Crawford who is too valuable to the team even with the suspect defense. How about trying to take a flyer on Greg Oden next year if the knee heels and he can get healthy since the Trailblazers did not pick up his option?

Astro Joe

November 19th, 2010
11:54 am

I thought that we were 8-4, running a great offense and destined for unprecedented success? Why do we need to revisit past drafts and roster moves when LD has corrected every previous mistake and healed all wounds?

Grandad

November 19th, 2010
12:23 pm

Here it is basketball season;
and all the talk is ancient history.

Once again folks wonder why Hawk fans don’t show up for games?

AJC/MC absentia!

In other towns @ least the media is talkin Hoops!

Hawks are off = MC “I’m out”

I guess there is no news on off days.

Do the Hawks practice?
Is Pape gettin’ any better?
Is Sund on vacation again?
MC; do they have you answering the phone over there?
Any roster news?
Jamal’s contract?
Inquiring minds want to know?

Your turn nc, I know, MC is great.
Better than Sekou, right?

Now I shall go to a;
Dallas, ORL, Indy, DC, or Sheboygan newspaper
in order to find some Hawks news.

Astro Joe

November 19th, 2010
1:24 pm

I, for one, could care less about the 6th guard who is at best Mario West and at worse Speedy Claxton. I’d rather have an update on Antoine Carr’s whereabouts than wonder about Drew’s personal pet project with the gimpy back. (I’d love to see Carr work with our bigs on post play).

Fundamentals

November 19th, 2010
1:25 pm

MC’s trying to keep things quiet like Sund on the Free Agent front. Adds to the mystique Grandad.

Fundamentals

November 19th, 2010
1:26 pm

I’m guessing Carr would look like a bus by now. What is he doing? Is it time for a 20-25 year reunion already?

Fundamentals

November 19th, 2010
1:29 pm

Carr has 15 folks who like his profile on Facebook. Maybe we should add to his friends list.

lewis

November 19th, 2010
1:57 pm

Grandad

“Here it is basketball season;
and all the talk is ancient history.
Once again folks wonder why Hawk fans don’t show up for games?
AJC/MC absentia!
In other towns @ least the media is talkin Hoops!
Hawks are off = MC “I’m out”
I guess there is no news on off days.
Now I shall go to a;
Dallas, ORL, Indy, DC, or Sheboygan newspaper
in order to find some Hawks news.”

If the ASG wants to sell tickets they can start by displacing the writer who seemingly has no feelings /passion at all whatsoever toward the team he writes about. I don’t mind MC’s posts, but they are informative at best, something any blogger here could produce. Due to the distanced tone, lack of passion, the posts are incredibly counter-productive to establishing anything positive and lasting about professional basketball in this city. Bret Lagree over at Hoopinion, a blog deemed to run on his pessimistic, truthful view of the Hawks, oozes with passion and knowledge, and win or lose, provides things a basketball fan might actually want to read and think about. Not merely lackluster articles written about lackluster performances. However MC, since this is just “your job,” and not something that requires you to express emotion, I’m sure these comments will not affect you (if you read them at all).
If I were the ASG, I’d offer to buy your position out from the AJC in lieu of someone that might actually spark a positive interest in the Hawks, regardless of how they play, win or lose.

oldtimer

November 19th, 2010
2:09 pm

Next two games will say a lot about Hawks.
Win against two deep talented teams in Dallas and Boston, and Hawks have validated themselves.

Lose at home against those two teams, with a relatively healthy roster now that Marvin and Mo have returned and played and rested, and it will be a long season.

If Hawks management is interested in getting interest in Hawks back and get attendance to increase, they must make a move if the next two games are not both wins. Otherwise, all claims to the contrary, this is not an elite team.

Its going to be revealing two games. For Hawks and attendance sake, Hawks better win, or we may start believing that this team has peaked.

Fundamentals

November 19th, 2010
2:22 pm

So true oldtimer, these games are critical to encouraging the fan base. The 4 game streak was enough to kill the fan base, 2 more and who will care. We ned hard play, great games. Wins would go far in helping this team. We need them desperately.

Sautee

November 19th, 2010
3:13 pm

Straw Man Alert:

“I thought that we were 8-4, running a great offense and destined for unprecedented success? Why do we need to revisit past drafts and roster moves when LD has corrected every previous mistake and healed all wounds?”

Now has ANYBODY on this blog said we were destined for “unprecedented success”? Perhaps I missed that.

Has ANYBODY on this blog said LD had “corrected every previous mistake and healed all wounds”? Perhaps I missed that, too.

No, that was just Astro throwing out another straw man.

What’s up, AJ? Why are you so down on LD if it was the HIRE you objected to and not the man himself? Shouldn’t this negativity be directed toward the ASG and not toward bloggers who like what Drew is doing? Are you somehow threatened by others approving of a hire you disapproved?

Your negativity toward LD makes no sense to me. Aren’t we on a pace to win 54 games? And weren’t you happy enough LAST YEAR to blast everyone else for not “enjoying what we have” when we won 53?