With Shaq off to Boston here’s a quick epilogue as it relates to the Hawks:
I’ve been told that Atlanta wouldn’t budge on giving Shaq a starting nod over Al, who is after all still only 24-years old and an All-Star. Shaq believes he will get the starting nod over Jermaine O’Neal in Boston as Kendrick Perkins rehabs from his knee injury.
Atlanta also wasn’t willing to pay Shaq more than the minimum and that was a sticking point for him. He didn’t want to sign for the minimum when the Hawks had their bi-annual and mid-level exceptions available because of the perception that would create–as in the Hawks could have paid him more but didn’t. That’s not the case with Boston, which had neither of those exceptions and so could only give him the minimum.
The big guy still has his pride.
The Hawks thought Shaq could help them and would be a good risk at the minimum salary despite his history of negatively effecting locker rooms and tending not to respect coaches who aren’t Phil Jackson or Pat Riley. It could have been a potential headache for L.D., who already has a lot to deal with in his first gig as a head coach.
So that’s that. . . .
The Hawks still are in the market for a center (I’ve still heard nothing to indicate they are seeking a wing) and they have veterans Francisco Elson, Brian Skinner and Josh Boone on their radar. Not so much Kwame Brown, who is thought to still be seeking a deal for more than the vet minimum.
Beyond those options, I also could see the Hawks waiting to see if any centers shake free as teams buy out vets when training camps open. They also might consider bringing some young center prospects to camp and give them a month to earn the 13th roster spot. There is some interest in Garrett Siler but he’s got a lot to prove after a bad showing at Summer League.
There’s still about two months until camp opens so there’s still time for moves to be made. But that 13th roster spot will remain open for now.
– Hawks assistant GM Dave Pendergraft has emerged as an early candidate to become Denver’s top basketball executive. Pendergraft also is one of several candidates for Phoenix’s GM job.
The Nuggets let go of VP of basketball ops Mark Warkentein earlier this week.
MC
613 comments Add your comment
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:12 pm
Why won’t my comments post?
Rondo
August 6th, 2010
4:14 pm
No Shaq……So What!
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:16 pm
Hey! What’s happening to my posts?????
Najeh Davenpoop
August 6th, 2010
4:18 pm
“For 2 people to attend an average game they’re looking at roughly spending about $170.00 total (or more) for the both of them (which includes decent tickets for about $60 each (or more), $15.00 for parking, $8.00-to-$10.00 for one drink each & $10.00-to-$12.00 for a food item(s)). Talk about astronomical!”
I don’t like the DASG any more than you do but this is flat-out false. First of all, there’s no reason to pay for parking at the arena when you can a) park at a MARTA station for free and take the train directly to the arena or b) park on the street at Centennial Place for free (across Ivan Allen from the aquarium) and walk five minutes to the arena. Secondly, you can get all that food and drink at CNN Center for half the price before you go inside (or you can do like me, don’t eat or drink anything at the game and go to Waffle House afterwards). It’s not that hard to sneak something from Great Wraps or Roman Delight into the arena in your pocket. Third, if you show up ten minutes after game time you can get those $60 seats for $40 from a scalper. Better yet, if you have a student ID card lying around in a closet somewhere you can get in for $15.
I go to 5-10 regular season games a year and I haven’t missed a playoff game yet since 2008. I have never paid more than $40 per person, even during the playoffs, let alone the $85 per person you are suggesting. The truth is Atlanta fans actually have it pretty good compared to pro sports fan in similar-sized cities. If you try to save money and you’re still paying $85 per person, it’s because you’re a sucker, not because the prices are too high.
Ken Strickland
August 6th, 2010
4:18 pm
NORTHCYDE-While I appreciate the effort, you’ve done little more than reflect your GLASS HALF EMPTY approach.
1-You seem to think that being LDrew being a rookie HC will automatically cause him to fail. Couldn’t you say the same about Bulls ROOKIE HC TThibodeau? How many rookie HC’s have intimate knowledge of the teams top 10 returning players, as well as their stengths and weaknesses? How many have worked with most of their assistants, players and organization for 6yrs? In you GLASS HALF EMPTY mind, you see this as a negative.
2-Tell me, didn’t most of the Eastern teams upgrade their rosters last yr, and didn’t the Hawks still manage to improve in wins and seeding?
3-It’s very possible that Teague might have difficulty running an NBA team, at least in the beginning. But isn’t it just as possible he could end up doing for the Hawks what ROOKIE PG’S DCollison and BJennings did for the Hornets and Bucks respectively? It should be obvious that LDrew doesn’t share your GLASS HALF EMPTY opinion of him.
4-Bibby may go into a greater decline, and then again, he might not. How can you make that a major concern, considering we no longer have a HC stupid enough to rely on him when he’s not producing?
5-Last yr Marvin’s production was his worst as a starter. Anyone without a bias, and with a clue, knows his production deceased as Woodson chose to exclude Marvin and rely more on players with more OFF talent, like FMurray and JaCrawford.
6-Mo Evans is a bench player who received limited mins and opportunities, and he complained. It’s sad that you’d think his lack of production last yr would adversely affect the teams ability to win this yr.
7-Zaza’s mins went down last yr, and he played the same way he’s always played for the Hawks. Using the way he plays as an excuse to employ your GLASS HALF EMPTY approach is really weak, even for you.
8-Wasn’t JCollins on the team last yr? And how do you know what JPowell will be capable of doing? Remember, there were a lot of NEGATIVE MINDED GLASS HALF EMPTY THINKING fans just like you who spent the entire off season criticizing the acquisition of JaCrawford and the release of Flip Murray.
9-The Hawks might not have a dominant post scorer, but they have 3(JJ, Smoove and Horford)who manage to do a good job. Last yr, both Horford and Smoove improved their inside scoring ability enough for one to become an All Star, and the other to receive All Star consideration. Why is it so hard for you to expect theit continuef improvement?
10-If you could somehow focus on what’s actually being said and done, instead of on your ingrained fears and apprehensions, you’d know by now the days of the Hawks being primarily an ISO and jump shooting team are over. Running, with constant ball and player movement, and attacking the basket is the new order of the day.
11-Why does JJ have to raise his level of play? If Woodson was still our HC, that would be a fair statement, but he’s gone. All JJ has to do to raise his level of play is become more efficient with his shots and get to the FT line more. LDrew’s motion OFF, which is focused on attacking the basket, should allow him to do both.
I have no doubt you can come up with more excuses for your GLASS HALF EMPTY approach. But the truth is, what you call REASONS, I call EXCUSES. Anyone who downplays the regular season is a fool. Playoff seeding, home court advantage, and making the playoffs are all determined by what it does during the regular season.
If a HC continues using the same approach, against the same teams, and gets the same negative results, what else can should he expect besides GETTING REPLACED?
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:18 pm
Is there editing going on, of my being critical of Skinner and Elson – and other Sports journalists making fun of us for looking at them also – 4 or 5 deleted so far trying to give the link, or even the website….
O'Brien
August 6th, 2010
4:21 pm
Najeh,
Although I like JC2’s talent, I would have been fine with drafting Damian James, a backup SF who was a big rebounder in college.
For those thinking about JC2 getting PT at PG, just because he played some PG in college does not mean it would be an easy transition for him in the NBA.
He would have to run the offense, and know when to pass, and when to shoot, along with defending other PGs. And his defense is the weakest part of his game right now.
So I dont think JC2 will get much PT except in blowouts our injuries.
Rondo
August 6th, 2010
4:24 pm
Boston has taken two steps back with the addition of J Oneal and S oneal.Both are lazy and uninspired has-beens.The hawks will have an advantage over a lot of teams in the east because they are familiar with playing with each other.Just because teams have added or traded players from their roster doesn’t mean automatic success.Many nba experts still think highly of your hawks, i just can’t understand why so many of you fanatics think so negative of your team.
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:25 pm
Ken – facts are facts – not half empty, or half full
Fact – Sund pocketed 3m and to this point refuse to use it – it frustrates fans. Maybe they’ll use it later
Fact – Bucks have Bogut back, Larry Sanders, Drew Gooden, Corey Magette, and maybe Micheal Redd added to a team that took us to 7 games – while we swap – JoCrawford for Mario West; Josh Powell for Joe Smith; Larry Drew for Mike Woodson – and wait with breathless anticipation on Brian Skinner or Elson – who are both old and terrible – or hopefully a Sund trade. We have a right to look at the current facts and be frustrated.
But who knows – Sund may surprise us – and look up these blogs – I’ve been a big defender of Sund
P.S. And the Bulls add Boozer, Korver, Brewer
Celts add the 2 O’Neals from a team that was 4 pt.s away from a World Championship
Heat add -well, you know…
Let’s just be realistic
‘
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:26 pm
“Refuse” should be refuses in the above post – sorry
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:28 pm
Wish I could share the article making fun of the Hawks looking at Elson and Skinner – the blog won’t let me…
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
4:29 pm
Ooops – too much info on the last post – another delete….
KevinM
August 6th, 2010
4:32 pm
KenS-I never gave the Bulls or Bucks higher rankings than the Hawks-noticed how I mentioned they would probably be 4th…again!
They are satisfied with that level. Are you?
Sund is already on record saying that he wasn’t interested in competing for franchise players or any major trades.
Since you speak of Teague, didn’t those other 2 have very good success in the SL even before their 1st training camp? I wouldn’t put all the blame on Woody….I haven’t seen much of Acie Law lately have we? And Law was what, the 3rd or 4th PG prospect? Teague was around 9, and Collison is outdoing him already.
Me getting on LD is simple; he hasn’t had any HC consideration anywhere. You pick the Tibs argument; I perfer someone who has been there before and outside of AveryJ, I wouldn’t have considered any of the final candidates we lined up…but what do I know? Experience doesn’t mean much in this league.
What you’re doing Ken is comparing the Hawks to the Bulls/Bucks, but start comparing them to Orlando, who has the coach I would have chosen once Riley let him go. Me, I wouldn’t have Spolestra either.
I am looking to improve upon a 53 win season, not duplicate the disastrous results in the past. And if you don’t consider last year disastrous, how did you feel once Orlando mopped us all over the 2 courts we played on during the playoffs.
The Hawks are bringing less ammunition to the fight, about $20M less. That doesn’t guarantee you success, but it sure shows the fan base, the ones who support your good/bad decisions that the interest is to be the team to beat, not the team to be able to compete.
Ray, When will the organization realize that we need a big man and a coach that the players will buy into. We need to win a title in the ATL and we need to win it now!!!
We still haven’t made the players accountable at any level. The only ones held accountable, Morris and West are no longer here. How’s that for the bonuses that Smoove and Marvelous received and the above inflation pay to E#2. Some moves that make you shake your head in disgust.
Rondo
August 6th, 2010
4:38 pm
Bucks = No Winners:Very Soft Squad:Over Acheived Last Season
Bulls = Utah Jazz East / Can be easily swept in second round
Heat = Dallas Mavericks 60+ win team / Can not win title without a dominant big man
My Celtics = Senior Citizens/Old Foggies/Old Farts/Too Slow/Will go fishing early in playoffs
niremetal
August 6th, 2010
4:40 pm
Ken S has been firing on all cylinders recently. It’s good to see that there’s at least one other fellow optimist in the house…
404atlhoops
August 6th, 2010
4:42 pm
Steve W,
I’m not buying the Bucks are better than the Hawks. Yes they made some offensive upgrades with Gooden and Maggette. However neither one of those guys play a lick of defense even close to Skiles liking. Also Brandon Jennings has never seen a shot he didn’t like. He’s going to have to make the adjustment of having more talent around him in distributing the ball and running the team as opposed to having the green light to shoot like he did last year. Also Redd’s health is a huge question mark. Factoring his age and the serverity of his knee injury I don’t think Redd will ever be the player he used to be a few seasons ago.
Regarding the bigs that are left for the Hawks choose from, I would prefer the Hawks to sign Brown. Brown brings the size and bulk that the Hawks lack in the paint. Contrary to what believe about Brown, he is a solid defensive center and somewhat athletic. I question his motor sometimes but the talent is there for the Hawks to take shot on him. Brown also needs to be more realistic in regards to what type of money he get in free agency as well.
cp
August 6th, 2010
4:42 pm
KevinM LD didn’t think Sy was a big man. It was MC who made that mistake. He even corrected it and said it was his bad…. How can you compare Collison to Teague? One started and played a lot of minutes and one received inconsistent minutes all year. Collison actually looked terrible at first. When he received consistent minutes he produced. Hmmm what do you know, a guy plays better when he received consistent minutes.
ryan
August 6th, 2010
4:42 pm
I think i rather go see a Thrashers game than watch the Hawks at least the Thrash maid some big moves this year.
cp
August 6th, 2010
4:45 pm
I also think the one thing people are forgetting when it comes to the Bucks is that they lost Ridnour. Last season when BJ was out there looking wild on the court with the turnovers and bad shots, Skiles would put in Ridnour who would calm things down on the court and shoot a nice percentage. I don’t know who their backup is this year but they will be missing Ridnour.
niremetal
August 6th, 2010
4:51 pm
Fact – Sund pocketed 3m and to this point refuse to use it
Gee, that’s funny. I guess I must have dreamt that the Hawks just signed some guy who wears #2 to a $124M contract.
It’s not like the cash from the draft pick trade was paid in marked bills that we can trace and determine exactly what it was spent on. It was mixed in with the rest of the Hawks’ revenues, and those revenues are used to pay the Hawks’ various expenses. Money isn’t so easily compartmentalized like that.
Oh, and btw, NBA rules prevent the owners and GM from “pocketing” anything. Money that goes to the team must stay with the team. Capital cannot be withdrawn by owners or other team officials. If that weren’t the rule, the many owners who experience personal financial crises would be able to use the team’s revenues as a piggy bank and teams would go bankrupt.
Like I said up top, I don’t think ASG’s moves the past couple summers have been cheap. I think they’ve been dumb. No one can be cheap if they’re willing to pay Joe Johnson a 6-year max contract. Dumb isn’t better than cheap, but it’s different.
Rondo
August 6th, 2010
4:54 pm
Why fear the deer? They have only one player that can penetrate Jennings who the hawks are going to shut down next season.And they have one player that can create his own shot some what in Salmons. Bogut and Redd don’t scare you on defense and the only way they will beat a team in the playoffs next season is if they out score them.
DJ
August 6th, 2010
4:54 pm
Chris Hunter anyone?
Rondo
August 6th, 2010
4:58 pm
The season hasn’t stated yet and moves can still be made. Fanatics stop wasting your time bashing your GM.
hawkfan335
August 6th, 2010
5:05 pm
MC.
A possible trade scenario…….. Put JJ at SF while moving Jamal into the starting lineup at SG.
Trade Marvin Williams and Josh Smith to Golden State for Biedrins and move Horford to PF.
niremetal
August 6th, 2010
5:12 pm
*ding*
Grandad
August 6th, 2010
5:36 pm
Okay -~- time for a G-dad Trade o’ the Day:
[to get yawl's mind off that 8th bench spot]
* If ‘n there was one (sometime between now & tr. deadline)
Cleveland gets:
Marv & Mo
Hawks get:
Varejao & Daniel Gibson
Works on trade machine!
1st you say Cleveland would never go for that.
Here’s the Cav’s motivation:
Varejao actually has a (sort of) bad contract;
*He’ll be 33 when upon it’s completion.
*avg about $8 mil per
plus Gibson is on the books for a couple of yrs @ $4 mil
(they just picked up Sessions via trade)
They get rid of two contracts / freeing roughly $12 mil
Mo is expiring + Marv is 4 yrs younger than Varejao.
* + They claim they wanted Marv earlier / anyway.
Marv avgs $7 mil / thus [the trade] saving Cleve 5 mil per.
Next yr. cavs in full blown rebuilding mode.
Our motivation:
obvious – Varejao = 6-11, 260 & a def specialist.
DG = 47% 3 pt shooter & backup pt guard.
Trade also works straight up Marv for Varejao. [trade machine]
Grandad
August 6th, 2010
5:38 pm
hawkfan335
I don’t mean to be disrespecful;
but that trade scenario is…..goofy…!
Grandad
August 6th, 2010
5:39 pm
*disrespec[t]ful*
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
5:46 pm
404 – I didn’t say the Bucks were better than the Hawks in the above post – I just mentioned the moves they have been making.
Nire – Fact – Sund pocketed 3m and to this point refuse to use it – My Quote
Gee, that’s funny. I guess I must have dreamt that the Hawks just signed some guy who wears #2 to a $124M contract. Your Quote
You know better than this. Sund according to MC indicated he was using the 3m to get vet bigs – MC confirmed this when he got back. You have to have 13 players, so this was implied, and common sense dictates that this was 3m over and above the vet minimum contracts.
The fact stands – Sund has not used the 3m to this point. Sund is not even an owner, I know he didn’t take the money personally. .
Sautee
August 6th, 2010
5:52 pm
Grandad,
If CLE would do Varejao for Marvin straight up, I’d do that in a heartbeat. Sign someone off the street to play SF when JJ wasn’t there.
How about Varejao (or as Big Ray calls him, Flopzilla) and Moon for Marvin and Zaza?
KevinM
August 6th, 2010
5:56 pm
cp, Teague will be and should be compared to Collison all day every day.
You’re telling me Bibby played so well that Teague had no way to get minutes? I disagree, Woody didn’t seen Teague taking them any further than Bibby, so he chose the vet.
Blame Woody, but Teague didn’t exactly play lights out when he got minutes did he? He still has some work to do and what else was he doing 24X7 while on the roster last year? All he has to worry about is basketball. You’re not giving Collison any credit for what he achieved in a short time.
I didn’t see Teague at all star weekend. Perhaps he can compete for the sophomore roster this time around.
And I did think Sy was an unknown to LD, so my bad if that wasn’t the case. I still don’t get the pick, but 5-8 years down the road, maybe I will.
O'Brien
August 6th, 2010
5:57 pm
Acie law won the Bob cousy award his senior year for the best PG in college. And he was the second PG drafted behind Mike Conley.
I was a big fan of acie in college. But he had 2 major problems (IMO):
1) injuries 2) woody
I think teague will be solid, and I think LD (a former PG for many years) and bibby (a good team Guy) will do a good job helping to get teague ready.
MUTUMBO
August 6th, 2010
5:58 pm
WHAT ABOUT ME???????
O'Brien
August 6th, 2010
6:10 pm
KevinM,
Its hard to compare teague with collision. Collison was getting minutes from before CP3 got hurt. And he did not have to worry about being pulled after 1 mistake.
Also, collison did not have an all star SG and the soon to be SMOY SG to pass the ball to and get out of the way, which I think is what woody wanted.
If anything, I think teague’s issues were mentally, he just never got comfortable enough to relax and play his game.
Go look at rondo’s minutes early in his career when he was getting bench minutes (sometimes sporadic).
And then look at the big improvement once They made Rondo a starter.
Grandad
August 6th, 2010
6:12 pm
Sautee
I know I’m in the minority, but I like Zaza.
12 & 8 1st two years as a Hawk;
anxious to see if he re-emerges under LD.
[after 4 yrs in doghouse]
As for the trade scenario;
I figured Cleveland may need a little Xtra motivation,
plus, DG = b.u. / pt.g. & I’ve always liked him.
His dad’s a coach + he can really shoot.
Somethin’ about those coaches kids.
Grandad
August 6th, 2010
6:23 pm
Sautee
I’m still of the mind that Josh can play the [3].
-plus-
Joe will play the [3] alot,
-so-
between Josh & Joe we have the [3] nailed down.
LD’s offense lend’s itself to:
Positions will not be stereotyped as in the past.
Defensively one cannot tell me that Josh
is incapable of guarding someone, yet Marv is.
Also factor in Luke Jackson, really, seriously, no kiddin’, maybe?
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
6:26 pm
Teague was the 7th PG drafted in 2009 for good reason – high upside, but a few years to reach it – kinda like Rondo.
Before that draft, there was a chart saying that Teague was that years Rondo. Then Steve Lavin of ESPN at that time, said he felt that in 5 years Teague may be the best PG of the PG heavy ‘09 draft.
Great, great potential for Teague – didn’t look good in Summer League however. Not stats, but how he played. it could have been the inferior talent he was surrounded by.
And for those doing the “minutes” thing – Jamal will play 29,30 minutes per night if he’s healthy, regardless of how you break it down. Most of you guys have been giving him 18-22 mpg. Not going to happen – he’s too valuable.
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
6:29 pm
And “experts” in this league (the NBA) are very high on Pachulia, regardless of whether we are or not. I’ve read too many opinions too many times really singing his tune. He’s considered a good ball player.
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
6:30 pm
Pachulia – a starter on many NBA teams. He’s not better than Horford, but a good big off the bench. Now if we can just find one more.
If we get Boone – he may take some minutes from Powell. We have the cash to sign Boone and Kwame BTW.
Najeh Davenpoop
August 6th, 2010
6:34 pm
“Pachulia – a starter on many NBA teams. ”
Name one playoff team where he would start.
KevinM
August 6th, 2010
6:35 pm
I never said Teague won’t be improved and he may very well make us a better team. I am saying that Collison was not considered as valuable by us as Teague whether Woody played him or not.
Perhaps getting away from Woody will help him, and I would like to see what he can do. It doesn’t mean that LD will be patient enough to leave him out there to make mistakes.
Woody was on the last year of a contract. He was there to win every game and he was comfortable with the core only.
I will sit back and see if Teague has what it takes when they hand him the keys.
My knock isn’t with Teague; he might make everyone better, but you can’t knock Collison’s success no matter what a coach does or doesn’t do.
I blamed Woody for Acie’s development as well, but where is Acie today?
Behind both OJ and MC in Memphis still trying to find his niche.
Melvin
August 6th, 2010
6:38 pm
The state of the Salary cap for all teams…
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=17012
cp
August 6th, 2010
6:43 pm
KevinM I like Collison but i don’t recall seeing him at all star weekend either……..How can you compare a guy who started and was getting major minutes to a guy who was getting a inconsistent 10mpg? That makes no sense………Woodson said in a interview a few weeks back that the reason he didn’t play Teague was because he was coaching for a contract. If you’re a coach who is coaching for a contract what would you do? Play the vets or play the rookie? He has always been a coach who preferred vets over rookies and lets be honest no matter how terrible a guy was playing Woodson would not make changes…..Marvin and Bibby stunk most of the year and Woodson refused to try something else. As many have said on here, there is no way Teague could have been any worse than what Bibby was giving us……..Teague will be fine.
SteveW
August 6th, 2010
6:44 pm
Najeh – I Never said he would start on a playoff team…. But maybe Boston for one – how about the Heat – How about the Suns? Maybe OKC – the Jazz? Arguements could be made….
Bangladesh
August 6th, 2010
6:48 pm
I SAY NO 1 GOES TO ANY OF THE GAMES NEXT YEAR!!! MAYBE THAT WILL TEACH ASG A LESSON!!!
Rod from College Park
August 6th, 2010
7:02 pm
Grandad,
“LD’s offense lend’s itself to:
Positions will not be stereotyped as in the past.
Defensively one cannot tell me that Josh
is incapable of guarding someone, yet Marv is.”
Grandad. You are actually coming around. Anything Marv can do, Josh can do better, besides free throw shooting, and MAYBE jump shooting. I don’t see why people don’t see that.
northcyde
August 6th, 2010
7:02 pm
@ Mr. Strickland
1) I’ve never said that Drew would fail. I’m on record saying that we’ll win 47 – 52 games. But I don’t think many people believe that a 1st year coach is going to improve this team over what we did last year. Bring Avery or Byron in here, and that perception changes, seeing that they’ve coached teams to the NBA Finals.
As for Thibedeau and Chicago, I’d say the same thing about him, if the Bulls brought back the same team from last year. But they didn”t. They added a star low post player, a spot up shooter, a perimeter defender, and a post defender. Chicago did it right. They changed coaches, plus turned over the personnel. They even traded away a fringe “core player” ( Hinrich ).
********
2) I guess you forget that we upgraded too last year. Jamal Crawford. Remember? The 6th man of the year, and a player that we’ve long needed to be a 2nd scorer alongside JJ. It would’ve been nice to see this organization take that approach again, and added the Hall of Famer.
********
3) The problem I see with Teague, is that Teague didn’t even run the Wake Forest team. Teague was a scoring PG at Wake. He didn’t even average 4 assists per game. He wasn’t known for his defense either. But you’re under the impression that he will do both things better than Bibby, thus, making us a better team.
The key to Jeff’s success is going to be getting to the rim to score, and making the 15 – 18 foot jumper. What other rookie PGs did does not matter. This is all about what Teague can do. People better not be surprised though, if Bibby not only gets the starting job, but that he’s also more efficient than Teague.
*********
4) Bibby going into further decline is a MAJOR CONCERN Ken. Of Teague isn’t ready to be efficient in a greater role at PG, and Bibby’s decline worsens, then who will play the point? I’ll tell you who . . . Jamal Crawford.
The last thing we need, is for Jamal to have to play 30+ minutes a night at the point, due to Bibby being useless and Teague not being ready. If that happens, that even puts pressure on fringe players like Mo and JC2 to perform when playing the 2.
Wanna see an interesting stat? Go to 82games.com and click on the Hawks link. On the very 1st page, you’ll see everyone on our roster listed. Look in the +/- column. While Horford had the highest on court +/- number, guess who was 2nd?
Mike Bibby
And he was also 2nd on the team in +/- differential, behind Horford. Bibby is an important piece to the Hawks puzzle. But if he keeps falling off, and sees his PT reduced, then Teague MUST step up.
********
5) I tell ya. Marvin has to be the most criticized and most coddled athlete in Atlanta sports history.
Marvin missing wide open 21 footers when he DID get the ball passed to him IS his fault. Marvin staying in the corner even when a shot goes up IS his fault. Marvin not being a more consistent rebounder IS his fault. Marvin not being more aggressive, even when the former coach literaly begged him to be, IS his fault. Marvin letting people come in here and take playing time away from him IS his fault.
And I’m not a Marvin basher. But I’m not blind either. When you look up the word “average” in the dictionary, you’ll see a pic of Marvin. And I don’t mean that as a diss . . it’s simply the truth.
There is no “I want to be a star” type passion that you see in Marvin, unlike Horford and Smoove. He’s perfectly content with being our version of Tyrone Corbin, instead of wanting to be Dominique.
So blame the former coach for Marvin not reaching his potential, just like you blame the former coach for every other bad thing concerning the Hawks. Just understand that sometimes . . . it’s on the player.
Najeh Davenpoop
August 6th, 2010
7:22 pm
“Woody didn’t seen Teague taking them any further than Bibby, so he chose the vet.”
Woody didn’t see much of anything. He played Bibby over Teague because his simplistic, isolation-heavy, easy-to-defend offense was a better fit with a shooter like Bibby than a quick drive-and-dish guard like Teague, and because if he played the veteran and lost he could claim that he didn’t have the players, whereas if he played the rookie and lost he would have been questioned for his decision.
“Blame Woody, but Teague didn’t exactly play lights out when he got minutes did he?”
Teague played 20 minutes or more in 9 games last season. Here were his stats in those games:
24 mpg… 10.4 ppg… 2.7 rpg… 5.4 apg… 1.2 spg… .6 bpg… 1.8 TO/g… 3 A/T ratio… 47.4% shooting, 26.7% 3fg, 84.2% free throws, 2.1 FT attempts/g
Here are Bibby’s season averages:
27 mpg… 9.1 ppg… 2.3 rpg… 3.9 apg… 0.8 spg… 0.0 bpg… 1.1 TO/g… 3.5 A/T ratio… 41.6% shooting, 38.9% 3fg, 86% free throws, 1.0 FT attempts/g
In other words, when Teague actually got more than chump change playing time, he scored more points, grabbed more boards, dished out more assists, and racked up more steals and blocks than Bibby, all while shooting a better percentage from the field. Bibby shot better from 3 and took care of the ball better, but Teague got to the free throw line twice as often and converted there at nearly the same rate.
Maybe that’s not “lights out”, but it’s a clear upgrade over what the Hawks got out of the point guard position last year. And presumably, those numbers would have been better if Teague had a consistent role and got a chance to build chemistry with his teammates. Of course, stats don’t mean everything, and it will be a work in progress for Teague to learn the fine points of playing the point guard position, but it’s perfectly fair to expect the team to improve with him starting. Teague doesn’t have to be Collison right away in order to be an upgrade.
Ken Strickland
August 6th, 2010
7:29 pm
Look, we could go on and on about this issue, and it wouldn’t accomplish anything worth while. NORTHCYDE, I know I came down hard on you, and I want you to know it wasn’t anything personal. I was simply coming down on your pessimistic approach to the Hawks. Even when I’ve come down of Woodson, it’s not about him as a person, but as a HC, because I don’t know him as a person. I’d probably like him as a person.
While there are certainly questions that must be answered about the Hawks, the same can be said for every Eastern Conference team that’s added players and are suppose to be so much improved. I just think that correcting and/or eliminating the internal problems that Hawk players had to overcome to accomplish what they accomplish last yr is a major improvement.
How can having your players able to focus on overcoming the opposition, without having to overcome the incompetence, stubbornness, bias and inflexibility of their own HC, not be considered a major improvement? Everyone seems to be so focused on what they think the ASG and Sund hasn’t or want do, they forget they have until the trade to get it done.
No team has ever won a single gm, conference seed, or NBA title in the off season. Didn’t we acquire MBibby at the trade deadline and ended up making the playoffs as a result? Last yr, didn’t Cleveland and Dallas do the same thing? The financial resources we have now will double in value by the trade deadline, and we’ll have a better idea of what we have and what we need.
I don’t see a single Eastern Conference team that has improved enough to unseat the Hawks as the 3rd seed. And depending how long it takes for LDrews OFF/DEF systems to become 2nd nature to our players, and the success or failures of Miami, we have the talent and ability to give Orlando, Boston and Miami a run for the top seed.
And stop saying our bench isn’t deep or talented enough for us to win. The Lakers have won consecutive NBA titles, and you can’t say their bench is anything to write home about. They refused to resign JFarmar because they didn’t think he was good enough to start. We’ve already had Hawk fans complain about us signing former Laker JPowell, and I was jumped on for suggesting we sign FA Laker DJ MBenga. Aside from LOdom and SBrown, that leaves , LWalton, AMorrison and SVujacic to round out their bench. Is there anyone who believes that is a bench to be feared?
Orlando’s bench might be the NBA’s deepest and most talented, especially with front line players, and they certainly have the NBA’s more dominant post player. Yet, they still can’t win an NBA championship. After going to the NBA finals in 08, they added LPowe and former All Star VCarter. The immediate reaction from a large number of Hawk fans was to concede the NBA title to them. HOW DID THAT TURN OUT? A lot of fans are doing the same for Miami.
drmaryb (*_*)
August 6th, 2010
7:37 pm
Untouchable!
Najeh … Damn Man! Can’t nobody mess with you.
Your communication levels, stats and facts are,m well – Rich!
Your Ish is UNTOUCHABLE!
You broke down that Bibby -vs- Teague game, like … Woe!