Atlanta Hawks: Getaway day

There will be a blog hiatus for a couple weeks while I get away for some me time. There’s a chance I might drop in with a post if anything interesting happens with the Hawks but don’t count on that (either something interesting happening or me dropping in). Meanwhile the beat will be in the capable hands of Ken S., who will chronicle the Hawks’ attempts to pluck a center from the bargain bin.

I suspect not much will have changed with my blog people when I return. Truth-Serum will still be using his multiple identities to agree with himself that Al is a terrible defensive center. JeJe will continue to rip ASG for not letting J.J. walk and using all that cap space to SIGN FREAKIN’ LEBRON. And all of you will wonder how in the heck this squad is supposed to make a move in the East with basically the same guys suiting up.

Be easy until I get back, blog people. Remember, it’s all love and and it’s just basketball . . .

MC

(Note: Commenting is closed until Michael returns Aug. 2)

1,155 comments Add your comment

Ken Strickland

July 20th, 2010
6:32 pm

ROD FROM CP-You claim everyone agrees that the playoffs are when players are made, and you use that as an excuse for bashing Marvin. However, you’ve conveniently omitted any bashing or judgement of JJ or Bibby, and we all know they haven’t distinguished themselves in recent playoffs.

You also made mention of Woodson doing exactly what he said he would do, and according to you, that’s increase team wins each yr. Now don’t you think that same playoff scenario should apply to HC’s as well? You see, when GM RSund gave him that last contract extension, he made it clear to Woodson and everyone else, in no uncertain terms, that he would be judged based on how well he prepared his team, and how well they performed in the playoffs.

The BS you’re espousing about him improving the regular season record was a mute point 2yrs ago. WHAT YOU FAIL TO REALIZE IS WOODSON’S FATE WASN’T BASED ON WHAT HE WANTED TO DO, OR WHAT HE DID DURING THE REGULAR SEASON. IT WAS BASED ON WHAT RSUND AND THE ASG WANTED, AND HOW HIS TEAM PERFORMED OVERALL DURING THE PLAYOFFS, PERIOD.

People like you are so focused on one player you can’t see anything else that’s taking place. You are so quick to point out the teams annual improvement in wins, and their 3 consecutive playoff appearances when it comes to Woodson. But when it comes to your favorite whipping boy, MWilliams, you act like he had absolutely nothing to do with any of that success, even though he’s been a 4yr starter.

Hell, the ASG won’t trade him, and Woodson wouldn’t bench him or limit his mins. So, shouldn’t that tell you that MWoodson’s view of MWilliams, as well as the entire Atlanta Hawks organization, is totally different from yours? And trust me, theirs is the only one that matters.

TRUTH SERUM-you obviously lack the ability to think beyond your desires and emotions, if at all in some cases. A good example is your crazy opinion that Shaq is the answer for the Hawks at center rather than AHorford. Well, after Shaq and the Heat won the NBA championship in 05-06, the next yr they were 44-37 and were swept in the 1st rd. The next yr(06-07) they were 15-67, and that’s when they decided to ship his sorry butt to Phoenix.

Before Shaq arrived in Phoenix, in 05-06 they were 54-28 and lost in the Western Conference Finals. In 06-07 they were 61-21 and made the semifinals. In 07-08 they were 55-27 and lost in the 1st rd. In 08-09, when Shaq arrived, they we 46-36 and missed the playoffs. And like Miami, they immediately sent his sorry butt packing to Cleveland.

In 07-08, with Ilgouskas as their center, Cleveland was 45-37 and made it to conference semi finals. In 08-09 they were 66-16 and made it to the NBA finals, and in 09-10, with Shaq as their starting center, they were 61-21 and got hammered by Boston in the semi finals.

Since the 05-06 season, when he won the NBA title with Miami, Shaq has been a cancer, and hurt all 3 teams he’s played for. If he can’t help improve a team as a starter, how in hell can you expect him to help a team coming off the bench, especially if he’s opposed to doing it? STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES!!

Najeh Davenpoop

July 20th, 2010
6:38 pm

“In 08-09 they were 66-16 and made it to the NBA finals”

Actually they lost to Orlando in the conference finals. This is why they brought in Shaq in the first place.

JeJe

July 20th, 2010
6:51 pm

Sund again: “I think we’re pointed in the right direction. I’m hopeful we’ll improve with some changes to our offense and our young players getting older, and we can stay among the top four teams in the Eastern Conference.””

LOL! The guy doesn’t care about winning rings. He just wants to win regular season games. He even said it himself: The blowouts vs. ORL didn’t matter because other teams got blown out.

Worst GM in the NBA.

The guy said our only goal 2 years ago was to make the Playoffs with a winning record (LOL!).

KWAME BROWN IS OUT THERE. WE HAVE A TRADE EXCEPTION, THE MLE, AND 3M CASH FROM SELLING THE PICK. IF U CAN SIGN JOE’S UNDERACHIEVING @$$ FOR $125M, HOW CAN U NOT AFFORD FREAKING KWAME BROWN?

THIS IS BULLSH!T

O'Brien

July 20th, 2010
8:03 pm

Ajc staff,

What do we have to do to get a new blog?

What about in depth comments from Connor in regards to summer league? Or how teague and JC2 critique their performance.
I know things are slow in hawksville, but we are on page 7 and this blog is on its last legs.

Sautee

July 20th, 2010
8:08 pm

All Truth-serum does is Whine, whine, whine.

Over and over.

Whine, whine, whine.

And whining about having an All-Star center!

It’s like complaining about the farmers with your mouth full.

(Hint: You lose credibility)

Guess what T-s? Horford is and will be the starting center here, at the very least until he’s re-signed.

Read, ‘em and weep.

northcyde

July 20th, 2010
8:14 pm

Here are my projections:

Johnson – 22 ppg ( 47% FG )
Horford – 17 ppg ( 53% FG )

Smith – 15 ppg ( 50% FG )
Jamal C – 14 ppg ( 43% FG )

Marvin – 10 ppg ( 44% FG )
Teague – 7 ppg ( 41% FG )

Zaza – 7 ppg ( 48% FG )
Bibby – 5 ppg ( 42% FG )

Evans – 4 ppg ( 42% FG )
Jordan C – 2 ppg ( 40% FG )

103 ppg

If the goal next year is ball movement, then I have to agree that it’s probably going to be Horford who benefits the most offensively. And if Teague plays more, and is allowed to run the show, that also may mean that Jamal will get a few less shot attempts, which means less points from him.

I don’t think Teague will get “starters minutes” though. I think you may see a 3-headed monster at the point. Teague may play the most minutes at the point, but it won’t be for 25+ minutes a game. More like 16 – 22 minutes.

Teague ( 22 ) – Bibby ( 16 ) – Jamal ( 10 )

The big question amongst these 3, may not be who starts the game at the point, but who CLOSES the game at the point?

And if we don’t add another big here, that’s going to force Drew to play Zaza more minutes at center, while Horford, and maybe even Marvi, gets more playing time at the 4.

I don’t know what people expect out of Drew’s offense. I guess some think that we’re going to get a lot of lay-ups and easier shots closer to the basket. I think what will happen, is that guys will get easier looks at jumpshots.

This may help JJ out, especially from an energy standpoint. Horford should be a beneficiary of the new offense as well. Smoove, not so much from a scoring standpoint, but maybe his assists will go up.

O'Brien

July 20th, 2010
9:12 pm

I think Zaza gets more minutes at center, with Al getting more minutes at backup PF.

and I think that will work for the regular season. When given extended minutes, zaza looked better than he does in spurts.

And playing al at PF more lets us see what he has. And it lets him get a better idea of his talents.

Hopefully our frontcourt will stay healthy.

Najeh Davenpoop

July 20th, 2010
9:18 pm

“I think you may see a 3-headed monster at the point. Teague may play the most minutes at the point, but it won’t be for 25+ minutes a game. More like 16 – 22 minutes.”

At the beginning of the season, this seems likely. I thinknas the season goes along, Teague will get steadily more minutes at the point at the expense of the other two.

Najeh Davenpoop

July 20th, 2010
9:21 pm

“I don’t know what people expect out of Drew’s offense. I guess some think that we’re going to get a lot of lay-ups and easier shots closer to the basket. I think what will happen, is that guys will get easier looks at jumpshots.”

I think more than that there will be more off the ball kovement which will result in more fouls drawn. To me that is where the offense has the most room for improvement. With the athletic ability and talent that exists on this team they should be top 5 in the league in free throw attempts.

O'Brien

July 20th, 2010
10:15 pm

Najeh,

Giving teague more minutes will help with penetration, which should lead to more FT too.

bibby had 79 FT attempts all year. Plus penetration should lead to some easy shots (or foul shots for our bits).

Dietary Suppliment

July 20th, 2010
10:27 pm

Giving teague more minutes will help with penetration?

More likely giving teague more minutes will help confusion and turnovers.

Obsessed with T. S.

July 20th, 2010
10:30 pm

Sautee

July 20th, 2010
8:08 pm

Knowledge Quest

July 20th, 2010
10:39 pm

doc

July 20th, 2010
10:40 pm

truth no doubt, we know it but gm’s sometimes think they can get a bargain. the point is he will play when he wants if they all try to low ball him this summer.

JeJe

July 20th, 2010
11:07 pm

Sund again: “I think we’re pointed in the right direction. I’m hopeful we’ll improve with some changes to our offense and our young players getting older, and we can stay among the top four teams in the Eastern Conference.””

LOL! The guy doesn’t care about winning rings. He just wants to win regular season games. He even said it himself: The blowouts vs. ORL didn’t matter because other teams got blown out.

Worst GM in the NBA.

The guy said our only goal 2 years ago was to make the Playoffs with a winning record (LOL!).

KWAME BROWN IS OUT THERE. WE HAVE A TRADE EXCEPTION, THE MLE, AND 3M CASH FROM SELLING THE PICK. IF U CAN SIGN JOE’S UNDERACHIEVING @$$ FOR $125M, HOW CAN U NOT AFFORD FREAKING KWAME BROWN?

THIS IS BULLSH!T

JeJe

July 20th, 2010
11:07 pm

Enter your comments hereSund again: “I think we’re pointed in the right direction. I’m hopeful we’ll improve with some changes to our offense and our young players getting older, and we can stay among the top four teams in the Eastern Conference.””

LOL! The guy doesn’t care about winning rings. He just wants to win regular season games. He even said it himself: The blowouts vs. ORL didn’t matter because other teams got blown out.

Worst GM in the NBA.

The guy said our only goal 2 years ago was to make the Playoffs with a winning record (LOL!).

KWAME BROWN IS OUT THERE. WE HAVE A TRADE EXCEPTION, THE MLE, AND 3M CASH FROM SELLING THE PICK. IF U CAN SIGN JOE’S UNDERACHIEVING @$$ FOR $125M, HOW CAN U NOT AFFORD FREAKING KWAME BROWN?

THIS IS BULLSH!T..

Ken Strickland

July 21st, 2010
12:37 am

I don’t think LDrew or RSund agreed to resign JCollins just to see him sit at the end of the bench and do nothing, like last yr. We were pretty successful last yr with Zaza being the only backup to get mins at center. Unlike a lot of you, I don’t think LDrew, Sund, or the ASG feel we need to sign a center for the express purpose of stopping DHoward, and I agree wholeheartedly.

With Teague guaranteed to get significant mins, it adds one more player to the list of JJ, Marvin, JaCrawford and JoCrawford that can penetrate and draw fouls. It also means we’ll have at least 2 penetrators on the floor at all times. With LDrew’s commitment to playing an up tempo fast breaking style OFF, along with Teague’s speed and quickness, there’s no reason not to expect him to be able to hit 4-5 FG’s and 4-5 FT’s per gm.

You can probably expect him to go coast to coast at least once a gm. Marvin, JJ and Bibby are 3 of the NBA’s better open shooters, and LDrew’s philosophy of using screens and attacking the basket, instead of relying on shooting jumpers, will give these 3 players a lot of open shots. I believe we’ll have at least 6 players, JJ, Teague, Horford, JaCrawford, Marvin and Smoove, averaging double figures, with Bibby coming close.

Could we use another center, YES. Do we need another center, NO. We proved that with last yrs success. We’re not going to win an NBA title next yr, so why go over board with signing players. Our title run will start next yr, after we resign Horford and make a decision on Bibby, along with the expiring contracts of JaCrawford, JCollins and MEvans.

If we trade Bibby($5.56M), and let JaCrawford($10.8M), MEvans($2.5M) and JCollins($1M) contracts expire, we can save close to $20M. I think that, along with our $3.5M trade exemption, is enough for us to resign Horford, as well as sign a quality backup center and PG. Remember, some centers that were traded, and those that decided not to opt out of the final yr of their contracts, will be FA after the season.

Rev in Tampa

July 21st, 2010
1:34 am

Ken, your confidence and well-reasoned post buoys my hope. Maybe next year is a necessary growth and transition year (Teague new at point, Drew new as coach, new offensive scheme, new defensive scheme, and flushing out expensive and unnecessary contracts).

As I think about it more, the more reasonable your post becomes. For instance, what if the Hawks break the bank for Shaq and Teague is not ready, or Drew is a flop, or someone gets hurt. If everything does not go PERFECTLY well, then we have set ourselves irretrievably backwards. At some point you have to go “all in” but right now there are too many unknown variables to make it a prudent bet.

I don’t like exercising patience when my job as a fan during the off-season is to dream big.

Rod from College Park

July 21st, 2010
3:51 am

“Marvin, JJ and Bibby are 3 of the NBA’s better open shooters”

?????? Wow!!!! No need to even argue with you anymore.

vava74

July 21st, 2010
3:55 am

Northcyde,

Not impressed at all with your rebuttal of Rosen’s piece.

Shaq was a flop for Cleveland and that was clear in playoffs when EVERYONE with a brain noticed that CLE should have ran more against the elderly celtics and instead played into their trap.

Also, it was vastly documented that CLE’s best 5 men combinations were all without Shaq on the floor.

Turk a choke artist? And you can honestly say that in a sentence in which vince’s name is at question? Look at how easy it was for the geriatric to neutralise ORL in the playoffs and you’ll get carter’s value as a trade.

Want other examples not mentioned by Rosen? Butler+Haywood = 1st round exit. More on Dallas from the past: Kidd’s trade for Devin.

Brand was a disaster not only because of the Achilles but also because he did not match their game style.

More from the past: Shaq to phoenix.

On Rasheed: he coasted the whole year and was partially responsible for a poor regular season record, which led to a more intense effort in the playoffs. Increased effort which may have been saved on those ancient bodies and might have helped boston be fresher.

Also: Sheed’s D on Howard. Granted that it was above average but Boston won the series defending the perimeter not Howard.

I could go the whole day giving you examples that match the matrix of the article: most off-season signings and in-season trades have more negative effects than positive.

Just to finalise: before the Jamison trade, Cle was playing really well with jj hickson and varejão with ilgauskas complementing them. Jamison took hickson’s minutes down to almost zero and choked (no rebounding, no fire, no 3 pts).

O'Brien

July 21st, 2010
7:24 am

vava,

I disagree with northcyde (Turk is not a choke artist, because he was a big reason why they beat Cleveland last year), but I disagree with you as well.

If we are willing to give Mike Woodson the majority of the blame in ATL, then isnt it possible that Mike Brown (not Shaq) was a big reason for Cleveland’s troubles?

You said “Cleveland should have run more”, but they didnt. Some will say Hawks should run more, but they didnt. The problem with Shaq, is he does not fit “any system” any more. A HC has to take advantage of his positives, and minimize his negatives.

Mike Brown does not know how to do that (if you read Cleveland blogs, they have similar complaints about Mike Brown that we have about Woody). And in Phoneix, all Mike D’Antoni knows is 8 seconds or less offense. How effective can Shaq be in that system?

I’m not arguing chemistry issues, because I think Shaq can be a disruption there. But I dont think we should ignore the coaching for part of the blame.

O'Brien

July 21st, 2010
7:38 am

Also, it was vastly documented that CLE’s best 5 men combinations were all without Shaq on the floor.

The 5 man combinations statistic is good and bad. The Hawks two best 5 man combination includes Bibby and Marvin, but yet we complain about Marvin and Bibby (and rightly so) all the time.

Without watching more Cavs games, I think its hard to base his performance strictly off the numbers. Also, coaching has to put the players in the right position to succeed.

vava74

July 21st, 2010
8:09 am

OB,

Charley Rosen’s article does not focus on the quality of player A or B but ON THE MERIT of the signings/trades given the teams’ own situation.

Hence, signing Shaq was a mistake for both PHO and CLE, as was a huge mistake for Philla to sign Brand and for CLE to sign Jamison (although Rosen endorsed this particular move going against his own past reviews of Jamison’s game).

With all this, I am not saying that if we signed Shaq I am sure that it would not work out. I very much doubt it would since I consider Shaq as a completely useless asset at this stage since mentally he is not willing to accept the (limited) role in which he could still help a team.

As for the 5 players combo with Bibby and Marvin being the most effective, I have not doubt of the following:

Marvin is not a liability. He does not bring enough offensively but was a very effective defender and versatile in the switch D.

Bibby can still play and I do not consider him completely washed up. The fact is that when Crawford played the point we were not effective at all since defensively we were still as bad and Crawford’s free wheeling offense is not good for huge stretches and alienated the rest of the bench, in particular when he played the PG slot.

In my opinion, Crawford played too many minutes last year and that had a very negative effect on both Marvin and Bibby’s contribution (and on the bench).

In the end, we were far more dysfunctional with Crawford’s addition than we were the year before with (gulp) Flip who had a more limited role but was more effective defensively at the PG slot and more suited for the job.

The 6 win jump can be explained by the fact that we did not have any major injuries and by Horford and Josh’s improved game, not by Crawford’s role.

Note: I like Crawford as a person since he seems a really nice guy but I doubt that he was (or even can be) well utilized.

Idiot Watch.

July 21st, 2010
8:29 am

Could we use another center, YES. Do we need another center, NO. We proved that with last yrs success. We’re not going to win an NBA title next yr, so why go over board with signing players. Our title run will start next yr, after we resign Horford and make a decision on Bibby, along with the expiring contracts of JaCrawford, JCollins and MEvans.

Gee, This is the same problem woodson faced. We knew going into the season he wasnt going far with out a center. Speaking of center, you are as usual hypercritical and illogical.

You say we cant make a title run until we sign Horford to a contract…How stupid is that ? Horford is already on the team and under contract. Is he going to play different once he signs a new contract?

I dont think so.

What you may be saying by default is we cant move horford because of his rookie contract, therefore we cant get a center until we sign and trade horford for a legitimate center. Gee…same problem woodson had but you demanded that he win a title with that. Now you are lowering the bar for Woodson II, saying we dont expect him to go far, Well make a run in a year or two.

If that is the case id rather have let woodson run the course rather than change directions and accept mediocrity for a couple of years. Basically you are conceding that we are in a rebuilding state.

You and Sund think a like. Illogically. You cursed Woodson for years as he lifted the hawks but now you are at peace with changing directions and accepting mediocrity.

Fire Sund
Fire Ken Strickland

Idiot Watch.

July 21st, 2010
8:30 am

“Could we use another center, YES. Do we need another center, NO. We proved that with last yrs success. We’re not going to win an NBA title next yr, so why go over board with signing players. Our title run will start next yr, after we resign Horford and make a decision on Bibby, along with the expiring contracts of JaCrawford, JCollins and MEvans.”

Rumplestilskin

July 21st, 2010
8:32 am

What the hell.

HAWKS NEED A CENTER OR YOU WILL NOT GO FAR IN THE PLAYOFFS AND GO BACKWARDS AS A TEAM!

HAWKS ARE LOSING GROUND FAST.

Rumplestilskin

July 21st, 2010
8:45 am

KEN STICKLAND In Tampa

July 21st, 2010
1:34 am

I love the way you agree with yourself

Based on your lunacy it was a mistake to not resign Woodson. It is paradoxical to say “the hawks are headed in the right direction” when with woodson we were headed up now by your on concession we are headed down.

I rather like the up direction as opposed to the down direction. Now we have Woodson II spending his time working (to improve?) an offense that was already in the upper half of the NBA rather than address a defense that was in the bottom half. This is idiot watch at the genesis.

Teague is a scrub. Crawford II is already better than him. Hes a better ball handler, shooter and defender. Teague is a scrub.

This team sucks because Sund is clueless. I agree with many of the voices on the site that are calling for sunds firing. Even Schultz admits Sund is lost, as are you. This team is taking backwards steps and the hope is gone out of next season.

We were right on the edge of becoming an elite team. We were just a center away. Now, mediocrity, next, lottery.

O'Brien

July 21st, 2010
9:08 am

Vava,

I will agree that fit plays a big role. And that would be my biggest concern with shaq if he came here.

Boston, who has a good coach and good player leadership passed on shaq, and lack of fit was one reason why.

But if I’m the hawks, and shaq drops his price, I would sign him and take that risk.

vava74

July 21st, 2010
9:21 am

OB,

As I said, I feel a tiny bit indecisive about Shaq, however, that indecision is not ration but merely based on a tiny bit of faith that he would fit in well and could really help us.

Decisions based in faith are usually bad, so my inclination is to always go the rational way and rationality says NO to Shaq.

O'Brien

July 21st, 2010
9:56 am

It is being reported on ESPN.com that 5 teams are in the running for Matt Barnes. Cleveland (who can pay him the most money), Toronto, Boston, Miami, or Lakers.

I wish the Hawks was one of them, because he gives us a legitimate backup to Marvin, and he is a better defender than Marvin.

If he signs with Boston, Miami, or Lakers, it would be another example of the rich keep getting richer.

Rev in Tampa

July 21st, 2010
10:14 am

Rumplestilskin, my point in agreeing with Ken S. is that we are assuming a lot of unknowns will fall into place this year to be in a position to win a championship. If we are convinced that Teague is an effective point guard then go out and get Shaq now; go “all in”. But if there is significant reservation about Teague’s readiness to step into that role then it would be foolish to get Shaq. What good is having a 20 minute per game center without a point guard that can run the offense. All the Hawks will have accomplished for sure is saddled themselves with another bloated contract (assuming the Hawks sign Shaq for the 2 year MLE). You, yourself, have serious doubts about Teague. You called him a “scrub”.

Futhermore, Rumplestilskin, if you think Teague is a scrub and you consider that Crawford II is our point of the future (surely you are not suggesting that Bibby is the pg who will take us to the next level), then it seems to me, that YOU must conclude that the Hawks are not ready to win a championship this year either. For it would take some time to develop Crawford II into a true pg.

You comment, “We were right on the edge of becoming an elite team. We were just a center away”, seems to be contradictory to your statement that Teague is a scrub. Which is more important, a starting pg or a 20 minute per game center who is only necessary to take care of D. Howard?

GeeMack

July 21st, 2010
10:17 am

O’Brien

Smart draft picks (Andrew Bynum), Great trades (Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom), & Great FA pick ups (Ron Artest, Steve Blake)are winning moves that allows you to pick up veteran guys at a bargain price.

When your biggest offseason moves are overpaying JJ, and hiring a rookie head coach with an unproven offensive system it’s hard to convince veteran that can help that you are serious about winning.

Also for the record I thought it was neccessay to keep JJ, but not for 6 yrs $124mil/4 yrs 80mil would have been better. He would have come off the books right at the end of his prime (32).

Samuel

July 21st, 2010
10:17 am

vava74

July 21st, 2010
10:28 am

GeeMack,

Get real. Do you think JJ would have accepted that offer?

We would have lost him and still would not have the cap space to sign ANYONE remotely able to replace what he brings to the table.

Also, the Lakers and Boston both had people formerly connected to them gift wrapping major talent against almost nothing.

Lakers got Gasol from Jerry West for very little (Kwame and Marc Gasol) and Boston got Garnett from McHale for expendable pieces (Al Jefferson, …).

Tampering anyone?

GeeMack

July 21st, 2010
10:35 am

Hawks fans listen,

Unless the Heat suffer major injuries in the next few season the Heat will compete for a championship at least 4 of those 6 years. The only teams that can eliminate them in the east are the Celtics and Magic. Everyone else is chopped liver.

Ken Strickland

July 21st, 2010
10:39 am

JEJE-With Bigs at a premium this yr, as evidenced by the contracts that were handed out, why do you think no GM or HC has even offered KBrown or Shaq a contract? If you can answer that question, then maybe you will understand why the Hawks haven’t wasted their time and money on either. The team has to be in a position to resign CENTER AHorford next yr, and wasting money by committing to a 2yr contract for Shaq would be stupid and detrimental to our ability to resign Horford.

After this season, we’ll have $14.3M in expired contracts coming off the books, and Bibby’s $5.6M expiring contract will be very tradable. Take that $19.9M and add the approximately $3.5M we’re now under, and we’d end up approximately $23.4M under the luxury tax threshold. Add our $3.5M trade exemption, and we’ll be in a position to resign AHorford and seriously add the pieces to become a title contender. THINK!

As far as blaming Woodson for everything that was wrong with the Hawks last yr, I see it this way. WOODY LOVERS want to give him credit for all of the teams success over the last 6yrs. Yet, they want to blame the players for everything that went wrong, and absolve him of any blame. IF YOU’RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION, YOU’RE PART OF THE PROBLEM.

Woodson did absolutely nothing to address the decline of MWilliams and MBibby, or JCrawford and JJ’s habit of taking over the OFF and going ISO all of the time. He did absolutely nothing to develop JTeague, or to develop and utilize his bench.

He did nothing to improve team chemistry, and he refused to listen to his players, his assistant coaches, or address the problems with his beloved switching DEF. He refused to over come his bias against rookie PG’s, or give his starters the rest they needed for the playoffs. WHEN IT CAME TO WOODSON’S ABILITY AND WHETHER HE SHOULD BE RESIGNED, THE POWERS THAT BE, AGREED WITH ME!

Bottom line, Sund and the ASG obviously felt that Woodson was the major cause of most of the teams problems, which is why they decided to hire his assistant LDrew. Drew was totally familiar with the players, the organization and the problems Woodson created and faced. They didn’t want to hire a new HC and take the team through a complete change. They wanted to retain all of the positives that allowed the team to win 53gms and make it to the 2nd rd of the playoffs. They did want to get rid of the negatives that prevented the team and it’s players from reaching max potential, AND THAT MEANT WOODSON HAD TO GO!

If this team can win 53gms and get to the 2nd rd of the playoffs with Woodson and the issues he created and/or refused to address, then this same team can certainly win 57-60gms without Woodson and the issues he created and/or refused to address.

Melvin

July 21st, 2010
10:59 am

Ken Strick,

No other GM was offering Joe Smith and Jason Collins at the time the Hawks signed them either.

drmaryb

July 21st, 2010
11:01 am

Ken Strickland

Say what you want – That is a “Man on Fire!”.

I love me some Ken Strickland! (*_*)

JoJo the Godfather

July 21st, 2010
11:05 am

Ken…your salary #’s for next year are a little confusing…We’ll more than likely have to take something back for Bibby, so that will go against any available $’s…Also, I’m not sure why you’re saying to add the trade exception???…This is not money that we receive, and it does not allow us to go over the luxury tax threshold and not pay…It is simply a trade chip that expires in a year…Horford will be due a raise of roughly $6M next year…Crawford’s expiring deal will more than take care of that and still allow us to add our draft pick (unless traded) and save $3M…However, I’m expecting a trade soon.

Clyde

July 21st, 2010
11:09 am

Ken what you don’t realize it that other teams in the Eastern Conference have improved mightily. Some of those 53 wins came against teams that we might not beat this year.

GeeMack

July 21st, 2010
11:15 am

vava74

I’m not sure if he would have, but I saw more accomplished players accept those type offers (PP & Dirk).

Don’t forget what Memphis got out of that deal, cap relief, and Marc Gasol who has a better upside than Horford. They traded for Zach Randoph (20 ppg 11 rebs) when K. Brown salary came off the books. They weren’t winning with Pau so why keep him.

What excuse do you have for the reason Miami nabbed 3 of the top 15 players in the NBA in free agency?

We can keep making all the excuses we won’t for the Hawks not being major players in making franchise changing deals, but the bottom line is we can’t sell players on the oppurtunity to win.

vava74

July 21st, 2010
11:17 am

Clyde,

Improved “ON PAPER”.

Most off-season moves and trades never pan out as originally envisioned.

TEAM USA filled with stars struggled and lost matches against other countries which presented teams which, although over matched from a talent point of view, played collectively better.

O'Brien

July 21st, 2010
11:48 am

Geemack,

If I’m not mistaken, because of Pierce and dirk’s age, the salary cap rules says they can only get a 4 year Max deal.

JJ would have been offered a 5 year max deal ($95 mil) deal from some teams with salary cap space. So for us to keep him, we had to overpay and give him a 6 year Max deal.

Do u think stoudemire is worth 5 years $100 mil (given his previous eye injury and knee injury, and no more Steve nash)?

GeeMack

July 21st, 2010
12:04 pm

Nope! I think that’s a bad deal as well. There are 2 teams with cap space that got it right this offseason, Miami & Chicago. Unless the Hawks make additional moves they will have wasted the money it doesn’t take another year to realize this is not the group that can compete for a title.

Don’t get me wrong I thought keeping JJ was a must, but it’s going to cost the Hawks in 2 yrs when Josh & Al enter the prime of their career.

GeeMack

July 21st, 2010
12:10 pm

O’Brien

Stoudemire only makes since if you get JJ, LBJ, D-Wade, Melo, or CP3 to go with him.

Also if Josh and Al can make a jump to 18 – 20ppg apiece and 10 to 12 rebs apiece then we will forget about JJ’s deal would make more since.

O'Brien

July 21st, 2010
12:18 pm

GeeMack,

Although I like Chicago’s moves, I think they overpaid for Boozer (5 years $80 mil for an injury prone guy).

I also think the Hawks overpaid for JJ, and the Knicks overpaid for Stoudemire. I dont think Bosh is overpaid too (in Toronto, he made the playoffs once).

But its a players market, and if you lok at supply vs demand, unfortunately, thats the way the NBA works.

drmaryb

July 21st, 2010
12:26 pm

VaVa

PP & Dirk are a lot longer in the tooth than Joe. And, they are on their 3rd Max Deals,
they both opted out. I’m sure at the behest oft their Agents to make MORE not LESS money!

I’m done hearing how Dirk took less money to help his team? Help his team do what?
WIN? I think not – What has Dirk ever won besides MVP’s for his mantle and twilight years?

Let’s Keep it Real! If nothing else – at least do that!

I respect you VaVa – Big Time man, but let’s compare apples to apples.
Joe is 28 years old and PP + Dirk is = 70 years old + or – .

vava74

July 21st, 2010
12:31 pm

GeeMack, OB,

Boozer is not only injury prone, he also has NO HEART and doesn’t play anything resembling consistent D.

He is waaaay overpaid and he and Stoudamine are not at the same level that JJ is. JJ is a much more balanced and complete player.

I am confident that he will improve in all facets of the game within this system.

My main worry is if there are lingering bickering in the roster which will undermine the effort put by everyone in buying into Drew’s system.

I posted a link from Sekou’s blog where there is a pretty interesting video of Drew coaching the Summer League roster mic’ed up.

I was favorably impressed.

I also enjoyed thoroughly reading the piece on Conner and watching his interview on nba.com/hawks.

I think we made extensive progress on the coaching side.

drmaryb

July 21st, 2010
12:31 pm

VaVa

Sorry, I was responding to Gee Mack – who was responding to you.
So, Gee Mack – my last post was in response to your comments
Re: PP & Dirk.

Peace! (*_*)

Najeh Davenpoop

July 21st, 2010
12:41 pm

“PP & Dirk are a lot longer in the tooth than Joe. And, they are on their 3rd Max Deals,
they both opted out. I’m sure at the behest oft their Agents to make MORE not LESS money!

I’m done hearing how Dirk took less money to help his team? Help his team do what?”

More importantly, league rules all but prohibit Dirk and Pierce from signing max deals. The salary cap severely restricts how much salary you can pay a guy after his 36th birthday. Dirk and Pierce are making as much money as possible under the salary cap rules.