Atlanta Hawks: LD doesn’t lack confidence

'Congrats, Larry. Any chance you can call J.J. for me?' (Curtis Compton/ccompton@ajc.com)

'Congrats, Larry. Any chance you can call J.J. for me?' (Curtis Compton/ccompton@ajc.com)

Give LD credit. Dude came out strong on his first official day as Hawks head coach. Some highlights:

– LD does not lack confidence. Before he’s even coached a game, he basically has announced himself as an offensive innovator. Asked if there were any teams or coaches that run similar stuff to what he plans to use, LD smiled.

“No,” he said. “This is going to be unique.”

Could he offer some specifics about the system? For example, will it be based on pick-and-rolls?

“It will have some pick-and-roll in it,” he said. “What it does, it forces the ball to move. That is probably the best way to explain it. Yes, teams will try to lock into it, but there are reads to it. There are triggers to it. It forces the ball to move, it forces the body to move. Now we become more effective. We become a five-man attack team. It puts all five guys in position to attack and to score.”

– What about defense, though? There’s two parts to that one. One is Drew’s view on using switches as a base defense, the other is prodding this group to give consistent effort–remember Al’s lament during the playoffs that the Hawks didn’t push themselves “to the point of being uncomfortable” and that’s what kept them from reaching Orlando’s level?

So, is LD cool with the switches?

“I have my philosophies defensively,” he said. “Certainly every coach in the league does. I am going to implement things that I believe in, certain coverages.”

Could he be more specific?

“I will say this: I believe in holding every individual accountable defensively. I think players are too good. If you get caught up in too many gimmick defenses. . . . We weren’t a big gimmick defensive team, but at the same time my philosophy is to hold guys accountable to defend their individual guy.”

In other words, don’t count in switches to bail you out if you can’t stay in front of your man.

– During his news conference LD called out Smoove for his jump-shooting adventures, which I think is one more time than Woody did it in public since I’ve been around.

LD said he wants Josh in situations where he gets the ball moving to the basket and doesn’t have to dribble much to get to the rim. I mentioned Smoove’s effectiveness on pick-and-rolls with Bibby as an underutilized element of the offense, and Drew agreed.

And what does Smoove think about Drew’s “no jump shots” proclamation?

“He’s the head coach,” Smoove said. “Whatever he wants me to do, I am going to do it. I like to be down on the block, anyway. That’s more high-percentage than the outside jump shot. I know that his offensive plays are going to put me right where I need to be at and everybody else.”

Raise your hand if you think it’s going to be that simple for LD with Smoove.

– It’s not like Woody was calling isos from the bench all the time. Yeah, he allowed it to happen with few consequences, but the bottom line is what he wanted often didn’t translate to the court for more than couple possessions at a time before it disintegrated into isos.

What makes LD think he can get better results?

“It will always be a challenge,” he said. “We have run a little variations of it and our players love it. I don’t anticipate it being a problem putting in more.”

Raise your hand if you think it will be that simple for Drew to get J.J. and the gang to break old offensive habits.

– LD hadn’t yet told J.J. that he plans to implement an offense that won’t allow him to dominate the ball. When they last talked, it was still early in Atlanta’s searching process, so LD said the particulars of his approach weren’t yet germane. LD left Joe a message over the weekend but hadn’t heard back.

(”I respect the position he is in,” Drew said. “I know he is [swamped] with a lot of phone calls. When he can get back to me, he will.”)

How J.J. will react to the idea of playing in an offense where he’s not pounding the ball is one of the big offseason questions for Atlanta. The thinking is that if J.J. can change his style, then he’s very valuable to the Hawks, and if he can’t, then not so much.

Drew thinks J.J. will buy in. A preview of his pitch:

Kobe, Dwyane, LeBron. . . I think Joe works harder than the three of those guys do to get baskets. I think the things I’m talking about implementing will make life easier for him. It will make him more effective and the rest of the guys equally effective.”

– Don’t read too much into J.J. not being at LD’s presser. The Hawks didn’t expect him to be there under the circumstances. Yeah, Jason Collins, RandMo and Mario made it, but then they weren’t going to get mobbed by media asking about their free-agent plans.

–LD offered more evidence that the Hawks are all-in with Rook’ (I’ve decided he’s Rook’ until the league officially changes years on July 1).

“I believe in both guys,” Drew said. “Both have the capabilities of running this offense; both guys will benefit from this offense. Mike is getting closer to my age, but the thing he brings to table is he can still shoot the basketball. [The offense] will create for him instead of him creating for himself. I believe in Teague. I think he has the ability to make team better and have an impact. I think the offense will benefit him with his speed and quickness and ability to break the defense down.”

In other words, the ball is out of J.J.’s hands, in Rook’s hands and Bibby is a spot-up shooter.

– Raise your hand if you think the Hawks are in trouble if this Rook’ experiment doesn’t work out. Because then wouldn’t the temptation be great to turn it back over to J.J. and Bibby again? Good luck going out and finding a legit vet point guard and a center with that mid-level.

MC

242 comments Add your comment

doc

June 15th, 2010
7:03 pm

didnt have enough hands MC.

doc

June 15th, 2010
7:04 pm

WOW, THE F WORD! mc blog no less.

five-man attack team

June 15th, 2010
7:06 pm

i like it. go hawks

i_am_soulstar

June 15th, 2010
7:08 pm

*Hand raised* but I don’t think they’ll put all their eggs in one basket. Hopefully, Sund’s puts some type of contingency plan in place via draft or free agency

Fire Mike What a Con & Ham

June 15th, 2010
7:13 pm

WHO HIRE HIS TABLOID, HATER AISE ANY WAY?

jlewis

June 15th, 2010
7:15 pm

I hope LD is successful, but as far as no jumpshots for Josh. You know every team in the league will lay back off of him and force him to shoot if he ventures 10 feet from the basket. Good in theory, but not in reality. There is nothing he can do if a team zones the Hawks with the same roster, they will lock on JJ, if he comes back, or Crawford.

i_am_soulstar

June 15th, 2010
7:16 pm

I am wary of big talk though, and Drew’s doing a lot of it. It honestly could be Phil Jackson saying all these things and I’d still be just a tad skeptical. I doubt it’ll be so easy, but I think it’ll be easier considering he’s already on the inside with the team.

chuckw/deadjournalist

June 15th, 2010
7:17 pm

i will not be the least bit surprised to see felton, jack, etc., brought in via free agency to challenge for the point. bibby as a back-up 1/2. i doubt this will be run TMJ if joe is back, but i sure hope it is close to that than iso-joe. only time will tell.

88Hawks

June 15th, 2010
7:19 pm

Hopefully JD’s plan to make the offense work better is a reason to hope, even if it does not translate to another 53 win season. JJ’s ISO caused a lot of turnovers and took precious seconds off the clock. I hope that if JJ stays, he’s on board to JD’s changes. I am afraid that Smoove will run over people and pick up too many fouls even if given the ball on the way to the hoop. He’ll need to have better body control to get his points and avoid fouls. I would still let him take a few shots from inside the perimeter from time to time, from the positions where he makes most of his shots and when the team is not fighting to get back in a game. M Bibby and Jamal C. missed a lot of shots they should have made. I guess when their game is on, the team looks great, but the team looks really bad when their game is not on. Is it rushing? Is it chocking? Is is what that makes a lot of the Hawks’ players look so bad sometimes? For those who think JD is not the man for the job and that Mark Jackson, Byron Scoot or even Mighty Mouse, er, coach Avery Johnson would have done better, JD has not coached his first game yet. Let’s give him a chance.

Michael Cunningham

June 15th, 2010
7:19 pm

@doc: “didnt have enough hands MC” haha . . . well, LD knows these guys, so he has to understand what he’s up against.

chuckw/deadjournalist

June 15th, 2010
7:19 pm

free agency/sign-and-trade*

Reggie

June 15th, 2010
7:21 pm

Michael

What do you think about Shaun Livingston? I think he would be a nice get with Jeff Teague. Thoughts?

WOODY II

June 15th, 2010
7:24 pm

Calm down T.S. Im not that ignorant as to think that is an viable offensive scheme. If you dont pretend that Mike con ham knows about basket ball hell write bad stories about you like he did my mentor Woody I

Its the same strategy he uses when he block your messages or delete the ones that disagree with his Bubba Crew mentality. Hey, I need a job, so just play along with his ignorant aise.

swatguy

June 15th, 2010
7:26 pm

My question is, what input will LD have in personnel issues. The Hawks have to upgrade at the 3 and the bench. Is LD in contact with Chillz? Is Chillz a priority? Who will draft.
If the guy is gonna cook up us a winner, he needs to be able to select the ingredients.

WOODY II

June 15th, 2010
7:27 pm

yea, I know these guys, you cant get blood from a turnip. We only had 1 3rd string all nba player so it aint like we got a lot to work with. Changing the label dont change the content. Hell, I may not win 53 games with this shette. Its amazing what Woody I did !

ignition

June 15th, 2010
7:27 pm

Not worried yet…
I’m about the wait and see approach..

ignition

June 15th, 2010
7:31 pm

Can we get Chillz Back Please…

JSS

June 15th, 2010
7:31 pm

Well good luck man’ing up with this bunch. I have no problem with switching and showing, especially on on the pick-and-roll. The problem with the Hawks has always been sustaining defense when they get to the 2nd or 3rd options in the opposition sets.

@ Ken Strickland…
I left a question for you the last blog…

jlewis

June 15th, 2010
7:34 pm

Am I wrong or was Chills a role player when he was here and we actually won more games when he left. He is not tearing it up in Europe against lesser talent. Chills can’t shoot or create his own, he is no savior. You can get a Chills for the NBA minimum.

BrittishAnger

June 15th, 2010
7:35 pm

Hand up….though it won’t die easy, watch for a reduction in those jump shots….

Ramon

June 15th, 2010
7:36 pm

Why is everyone acting like Chills was an All Star, or even the FOURTH best swing man taking in his draft? I know they say absence makes the heart grows fonder, but give me a break. I remember Chills being serviceable at best. I remember 3-4 seasons JC missing a lot of times because of foot troubles, ankle troubles and everything else. I remember 2 seasons where Chills couldn’t even jump high enough to dunk, couldn’t shoot, and couldn’t defend. Chills is not worth more than $4 mil at the MOST. If Mike Miller, Brewer, and a few others aren’t going to make more than $5 mil, there’s no way you can really justify paying Chills more than that. So renounce him, and be done with it, or trade the rights for someone else.

Yup!

June 15th, 2010
7:38 pm

“Mike is getting closer to my age, but the thing he brings to table is he can still shoot the basketball.”

Well This guy below can shoot just as good. Oh! and he dribbles and plays defense as well!!! What a world!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGtjWLyE7HU

BrittishAnger

June 15th, 2010
7:40 pm

Oh….and haven’t we already argued about what we should be calling Jeff Teague? Something like Lil’ Big Man? Yup…you can drop rook on the 24th if you gotta keep the albatross around his neck…it’s your popcorned vehicle….

Mystikal

June 15th, 2010
7:44 pm

I wanna know about Chillz also. The situation really hasn’t changed. He’s going to want another deal and ASG is still holding onto their wallets like a dog with a bone. I don’t believe they are going to pay to keep him so can we at least get some draft picks for him (ala David Andersen) rather than just be left with nothing?

WOODY II

June 15th, 2010
7:47 pm

The hawks fans seem to have mediocrity confused with exceptional talent. The truth is this team was ousted from the playoffs because it runs a low post defensive strategy called the cream filled doughnut.

Very soft on the inside!

JSS

June 15th, 2010
7:51 pm

Childress has evolved a fairly good amount since he left here. No, he is never going to be confused with LeBron or someone who can carry a team. Still, it depends on if you consider him to be an upgrade to what Marvin gives us… And more importantly can we afford him?

Dukester9

June 15th, 2010
7:54 pm

Joe Johnson sign and trade with Marvin/Bibby (prefer Marvin go). Send them to the 76ers for Iguodala and Sam Dalembert. We would have a real good defensive team . Find a good 3ptr shooter to come off the bench. MAKE THE DEAL SUND. We dont need a superstar look at what the celtics are doing with the 2nd tier “4″. Good defense will always overcome good offense. Pick your sport it doesnt matter.

Yup!

June 15th, 2010
7:57 pm

Chills is an upgrade on what Mo Evans gives us…..not necesarily Marvin.

doc

June 15th, 2010
8:00 pm

mc, good info and questions regarding the new hire.

any word about chills being part of the mix or if drew would even like to see his fro around the phil if his gm delivered him such a package? any comments from chills forth coming about drew and if he would like to play for the man?

yes, i think we need a few more bodies. since chills is our property i would like to see this asset put in play sooner rather than later.

High Hawk

June 15th, 2010
8:39 pm

@doc

Ive been on the Childress band wagon since the season ended. So I totally agree that we need to get him back in Atlanta. Maybe LD will really open up the competition for some playing time.

Another thing is, I really believe in the Rook. He played well at times and the summer ball is really going to help develop him. The idea of JJ off the ball is the best idea. I believe that will elevate his game to a new level. And if we can use that mid-level to get any kind of center well have a pretty solid team and bench.

Drew wasn’t my first pick for coach, but as this settles in I’m beginning to think they made the right choice. There is definitely a positive Vibe coming from Atlanta.

O'Brien

June 15th, 2010
8:57 pm

@ Ramon,

Check your numbers. In Chill’s 4 seasons, he played 80, 74, 55 and 76. So he had one season ruined by injuries, but in the other 3, he played an average of 77 games each season.

And although I am okay with a cheaper option (like Ronnie Brewer, or Matt Barnes), lets not sell Chills short. All Mike Miller does is shoot. What happens when his shot isn’t falling? Chills can bring the ball up (Marvin can’t), he can defend 3 positions decently, and he scores 10-12 pts a game without plays run for him.

And for somebody who can’t shoot, his career FG% is .52%.

Tony from Stone Mountain

June 15th, 2010
9:00 pm

They should send the whole team to summer league to work on the new offense!

O'Brien

June 15th, 2010
9:12 pm

@ MC,

Any word on Drew’s staff?

Michael Cunningham

June 15th, 2010
9:12 pm

@ Reggie: “What do you think about Shaun Livingston? I think he would be a nice get with Jeff Teague. Thoughts?”

he hasn’t really been an effective, full-time player since 2006-07. but his 24-game stint with Washington wasn’t too bad. if Hawks can get him in on a partial guarantee he might be worth a look.

Michael Cunningham

June 15th, 2010
9:15 pm

@swatguy: “My question is, what input will LD have in personnel issues. The Hawks have to upgrade at the 3 and the bench. Is LD in contact with Chillz? Is Chillz a priority? Who will draft. If the guy is gonna cook up us a winner, he needs to be able to select the ingredients.”

LD will have some input, of course, but Rick Sund is the GM and ASG signs the checks. as far as Childress, the feeling i get is both he and the Hawks think the most likely scenario is for Childress to sign an offer sheet elsewhere or be used in a sign-and-trade.

Michael Cunningham

June 15th, 2010
9:17 pm

@BrittishAnger: “Oh….and haven’t we already argued about what we should be calling Jeff Teague? Something like Lil’ Big Man? Yup…you can drop rook on the 24th if you gotta keep the albatross around his neck…it’s your popcorned vehicle….”

haha

Astro Joe

June 15th, 2010
9:20 pm

Interesting how Drew has everythingalready figured out. Almost makes you wonder what kind of input he’ll use from his assistants. Also, I wonder how he may react if the defenses adjust to this innovative offense he plans to run? I hope he isn’t like the musician who has a phenomenal first albu because it is comprised of the best songs they composed if the years prior to landing a record deal. And then when it is time to “adjust” and produce that next record, they disappear in a cloud of D’Angelo dust.

Michael Cunningham

June 15th, 2010
9:20 pm

@doc: “any word about chills being part of the mix or if drew would even like to see his fro around the phil if his gm delivered him such a package? any comments from chills forth coming about drew and if he would like to play for the man?”

no official word from Chills camp yet. i still think it’s more likely he’d sign elsewhere or be dealt than play for the Hawks.

Michael Cunningham

June 15th, 2010
9:21 pm

@O’Brien: no word on the staff yet. LD has been overwhelmed by calls from coaches looking for a gig, as you might imagine.

JSS

June 15th, 2010
9:34 pm

@ British Anger and Mr. Cunningham…
What BA was referring to was the banter last summer during Rookie/UFA camp (which predated your hire) where the moniker “JT0″ was placed on Teague by a number of bloggers on Sekou’s old blog.

Ken Strickland

June 15th, 2010
9:35 pm

J$$-thanks for your concern and encouragement. I also agree with you and DOC about Chills. His passing, ball handling and penetrating skills, even if he hasn’t improved, would be ideal for the type of motion and penetrating OFF LDrew is talking about implementing. Based on what LDrew said about his proposed OFF and DEF philosophy, everything he plans to implement will be the complete opposite of what Woodson did. WORKS FOR ME.

I have to disagree with you on RMorris’ ability. While he’s certainly not a complete player by any means, his OFF skills are developed enough to make him a valuable weapon in certain situations and match ups, especially at PF.

I’m certain that your sentiments about Morris were at one time echoed about Ben Wallace as well, before Pistons GM Joe Dumars rescued him from the end of a bench. A similar thing can actually be said about PG Chauncey Billups, before Dumars did the same for him. I look at it this way.

I’ve studied ancient African history for over 25yrs, and I’ve always been fascinated by a group of Africans called the DOGON, or CLIFF DWELLERS, who live in East Africa. These unbelievable people are in possession of advanced knowledge that in some ways exceed our own. They specialize in astronomy and astrology, and their knowledge extends into the realm of quantum physics and mechanics. They know about the Big Bang theory, the Sirius B or White Dwarf Star, which is supposed to be invisible to the naked eye, its elliptical orbit, composition, and its powerful gravitational effect on the Sirius star.

Yet, so called experts are confounded to explain how a group of people, who live what has been described as a STONE AGE existence, can be in possession of such advanced scientific knowledge. Therefore, these so called experts have resorted to making up stupid and unsubstantiated excuses and explanations to try and explain away how the DOGON acquired this knowledge.

Why is this a problem for them? Well, these so called experts can’t seem to bring themselves to get beyond the DOGON’s Blackness and living conditions. I used this analogy to make a point. Far too often we judge players by what we don’t know, see, or can’t comprehend. Just because a player hasn’t done something before doesn’t mean he’s not capable of doing it at all.

Throughout NBA history we’ve seen players come out of the CBA and obscurity to become very productive players, even All Stars, when suddenly placed in certain situations and given an opportunity, adequate mins and support. I watched RMorris throughout training camp after seeing how much weight he’d lost, and he was one of our most improved players during camp.

Can we find someone better, YES. But can we afford someone better who can do the things he does best?

♥Mz. Hawkdafied♥

June 15th, 2010
9:39 pm

The term ”rook” in reference to Jeff Teague is so played out right now. That’s so last season which for the team ended in May way before July 1st. And the Hawks will be picking new rookies on June 24th. What’s that like a week before July 1st.

MC you are contradicting yourself by calling it a rook’ experiment. Remember the experiment takes place after July 1st and according to your standards Jeff Teague will officially be free of the term “rook”.

JeJe

June 15th, 2010
9:46 pm

Can we please try to get some assistants like Sam Mitchell or Paul Silas in here? Let’s not let scrubs like Bob Bender (who?), Jim Todd (who?) and others in our locker room

Ramon

June 15th, 2010
9:50 pm

O’Brien, I’m not saying I wouldn’t like to have Chills. I’m saying I don’t think he’s worth as much as his camp has been holding out for. And apparently the other teams in the NBA haven’t felt that way yet either. If Ariza and Artest are signing for mid-level type money, Chills has to be step below them.

Ramon

June 15th, 2010
9:54 pm

The worst mistake Sund could do is overpay for Chills simply because he overpaid for Marvin. True enough Marvin isn’t worth his contract at this stage, and neither is Chills. And personally I would rather use majority of the mid level to find a adequate big and go cheap on the swing.

Grandad

June 15th, 2010
10:02 pm

When a Coach says:
“this is what I expect”
or
“these are my expectations”
now
it becomes real simple.

It’s as simple as raising children;
say what you mean
&
mean what you say.

No ifs, ands or buts.

The 1st one to challenge you [authority]
you must drop the Nuclear Bomb.
I don’t care if it’s Joe or Josh & you pray it’s not Al.
You set your precedent.
You only get one chance to make a 1st impression!

As for your article [MC] & the responses about raising hands.
We are only going to have to raise our hands once.
He wins or loses the 1st battle.
After that none of your other queries matter.

Upon listening to the man & reading your column,
I agree,
I ‘feel’ [not know] that LD has the chops to
back up his words.

O'Brien

June 15th, 2010
10:06 pm

Ramon,

I think Chills is valuable, but I agree with you. Sund should not overpay. But I dont think we should remounce Chills (although if he decides to stay in Greece, I would consider it).

Chills 1 year QO is ~$4.8 mil, which isn’t bad. But we could probably have Matt Barnes or Ronnie Brewer for less than that. If Chills wants more money, then maybe Sund can SNT Chills for a bench player and a pick.

JSS

June 15th, 2010
10:09 pm

@Mr. Strickland…
You are a blogging legend, and more important a person “fighting the good fight,” just keep doing what you do!

Nope, I saw Ben at Virginia Union, big difference, he’d wondered around Europe (Italy I think) before for a year signing in DC. The trade to Detroit just gave him a chance to play D. Rasheed’s arrival finally gave him a chance to really freelance and just block, rebound, and muscle folks. Ben was always dedicated, I just don’t see that in Randolph…

Mike is back

June 15th, 2010
10:25 pm

MC, great timing on this blog…I guess I got to raise my hand…because I tried to make a comment about LD confidence in the previous blog…but it got ate up.

Yeah, you right…you got to give LD some credit…dude got some swagger. Maybe it’s the luxury of observing these guys as a assistance…but LD expression…looks like a guy that knows what he is up against…he looks like a mad scientist…with some mad plans…I like it. I was looking at some clips of his interview…Dude definitely come off as a HC with confidence. I was checking out his response to some questions…his body language and mannerism says he the man in charge. LD looks like he got a plan…and it isn’t the same as Woody.

However, we all know talk is cheap…no it want be that easy…but give him some credit…he is calling out the right guys. I think the difference with LD is he believes in the players…Woody always believed in his system. The 64 hundred dollar question is…can he command the respect of the guys during the game.

It not enough to get Josh to stop shooting 3s…the real key is to get Josh to understand that he is vital to the success of the team. If he can do that…then he earned his stripes.

Again, you gotta to give LD credit…he seems undaunted by the task of being a HC in the NBA. YOU CAN’T ASK FOR MORE THAN THAT!!!

HEY, GO LD…make us proooooooooooooud!!!

JSS

June 15th, 2010
10:34 pm

Man, what is more scary, that Shelden got to play in the Finals or that Doc is actually talking strategy with Tyrone Lue?

Hawk n the Ham

June 15th, 2010
11:24 pm

Teague’s nickname was given to him during preseason last year.

Lil’ JT0

cp

June 15th, 2010
11:54 pm

I’m ready for the draft then the summer league. I’m guessing Drew will be coaching the summer league team so we might get to see some of this offense he plans to run. I know last year NBA TV showed the summer league games so hopefully they do it again this year. I also think NBA TV will be doing the draft. I’m going to watch their coverage rather than ESPN. Stuart Scott makes it unbearable to watch the draft now. I think I muted the tv last year because dude was so corny. I also watch the NFL network for their draft. ESPN does everything but tell you what you what you want to know during the draft. I’m happy that NBA TV decided to cover it this year too. Makes it a lot easier to watch now.

Melvin

June 15th, 2010
11:58 pm

LD sounds like a guy who is eager, well prepared and ready to lead this team. Just what this team needed.

doc

June 16th, 2010
12:15 am

thanks for the come back on the chills question mc. sounds like nothing official or even info to be optimistic about.

high hawk, i had some time tonight to listen to the interviews with ld on the radio stations. i think it was on 680 ld addressed the chills factor and said he would fit perfectly into his scheme as a slasher type of player and would discuss it further with sund. doesnt mean he will be back but is at least in the discussions. i have long wished he were a part of this. check out the interviews posted either here or on the fan blog done well by mister big ray also known and loved by some as big gay.

at jss, lol.

Big Ray

June 16th, 2010
1:58 am

Raise your hand if this “Teague experiment” thing has you worried. Now raise your hand if you were one of those people who scoffed at Teague’s meager playing time last year, spouted off about him not having earned playing time because he couldn’t show you regular rotation production with “scrub minutes”, and figured he just lacked the skills to get the job done, despite the praise he got from his coach (who figured he had plenty of time before Bibby started getting run down). Now take that hand and smack yourself on the forehead. Hard.

Something tells me that will all the mentioning of “variations” by Drew in regard to his offense, he won’t have a problem implementing any necessary changes or adjustments to opposing teams, when they catch on to what the Hawks are doing. How is that for a change of pace. Actual coaching.

His defensive philosophy is better than I thought, as he will hold guys accountable for actually guarding their man. Goodbye switching defense, you won’t be missed, unless your name is Mike Bibby or Jamal Crawford. No more “hiding” people with our defensive scheme. No more 4s and 5s trying to guard 1s and 2s. At least not for possession after possession.

Thank God for a coach who calls guys out on day 1. Now Joe doesn’t have to wait until post game media interviews to do it. As much as I still think Josh needs to develop a decent midrange jumper, if Drew wants him on the block, Josh learns some solid go to moves (and gets the ball in transition more, as Drew says he should, with minimal dribbling), and it works out…then I have no complaints.

If Joe can’t get with an offensive scheme that lets him shoot less difficult shots (and makes him more effective), but limits his ball pounding and ISOs….then he can kick rocks. We don’t need a selfish player with a max contract. I’d rather have less talent and more team chemistry. Bring in Brewer/Morrow, on the double.

I never thought, and still don’t think that Childress is ever going to wear a Hawks uniform again. I’d like to be wrong (for the right amount of money, of course), but I don’t think I am, unfortunately.

Grandad

June 16th, 2010
2:08 am

Big Ray:

I think holding the guys accountable is much more important
than whatever scheme we run.
Also a team can switch on & with paticular players wlile not
with others.
Flexibility on defense sometimes trumps the mule-headed approach.

Seems his [Woody] mentor Coach Knight (whom I respect) has some
of those very same [rigid] qualities.

Greensboro, Georgia

June 16th, 2010
3:34 am

————————————–
……Nesbitt for Heisman……
————————————–

truthspitter

June 16th, 2010
5:41 am

I’m about to go grow a 15 inch penis, raise your hand if you believe me?

Urban Meyer

June 16th, 2010
7:09 am

Ranks as the dumbest Hawks move in history!

O'Brien

June 16th, 2010
7:14 am

Listening to LD’s radio interviews, he is saying the same thing that us average fans have been saying the entire year. Too much ISOs, not enough ball movement, Josh needs to be in the post more, and we need to defend better. Hopefully he can convince the players to buy in, and trust each other.

Also, there is an interview on 680 where LD said one of the problems with Marvin was he did not know his role, and did not know when shots were coming. Hopefully once Marvin’s role is defined, and we get better ball movement, maybe Marvin can improve on his season from last year (although I can’t imagine him getting worse). Although as Rod would say, I’m not holding my breath.

Big Ray,

Does that mean LD is going to throw Teague to the wolves this year? It’s interesting how a guy can go from “not worthy of minutes” to (potentially) being the starter. And that’s even before summer league and training camp.

He has some of the things we lacked last year. Speed, quickness, better defense at the point, quick hands, the ability to get guys involved, and he was a one man fast break at times. I hope Jeff realizes the opportunity he has, and will work his tail off to improve this offseason (and he should be taking 500 jumpers and floaters a day).

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
7:42 am

MJ

Put up 300 made three pointers per day before he went home after practices – however long it took, sometimes till 11 pm. Meanwhile! Allen Iverson was holding press conferences and asking,
“Practice? Your’re talking to me?

Woodson 2.0

June 16th, 2010
7:50 am

My former boss.

Woodson’s mentor and long time boss was Larry Brown, it is true that he attended I.U. under Bobby Knight and was knight go to guy, but Woodson learned the pro game from Larry Brown. Thats who taught him about coaching and the game of basketball

He came to the Hawks after a stint as an assistant coach on the 2003-04 Detroit Pistons NBA Championship team and was a long-time assistant under Larry Brown. Woodson was known for getting the most of defensive players, allowing teams coached by him and Brown to limit opponents to just under 42% shooting. Woodson played college basketball at Indiana University and was a protege of legendary coach Bob Knight. He was the leading scorer on the 1979 Indiana team that won the NIT championship.

GTT

June 16th, 2010
7:52 am

I hear Speedy Claxton might be available.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
8:23 am

Somebody ask Larry Drew if he can play defense without a CENTER ? To quote Ron Simmons “Damn !”

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
8:25 am

If Drew can get Marvin Williams to play a full game with effort that will be a miracle in itself… Remember that Marvin was the 6th man at UNC not Jordan.

Samuel

June 16th, 2010
8:25 am

I am happy that LD got his big break. Just not too happy it is with our team. A team who won 53 ball games, a team trying to sign it’s best player and move to another level. The man sounds very sincere and hopefully he will be a good coach, “one day”.

I sounds easy to say that you’re gonna hold people accountable which I take it to mean, bench them if they don’t, but who will you replace them with?

JJ hasn’t even talked to the man yet. Ding!!!Ding!!!!Ding!!!!

Mr. Drew has his work cut out for him. We need to finish at least in the top 4 or our chances in the first round are greatly reduced. Considering the fact that Eastern Conference teams have loads of money to throw at FAs and and the top 3 draft picks go to Eastern Conference teams, our chances look slim to me. We will be pushing it to make the playoffs.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
8:29 am

So MC, why is it that Childress would be a sign and trade instead of sign and play for the Hawks. Hawks need him more than any other team does. If Hawks lose JJ then J.Smith is your 1st offensive scoring option. Hawks will go 20-62 if that’s the case…

Woodson 2.0

June 16th, 2010
8:33 am

If all the hawks played all the time at 80% of their ability(no one plays 100% all the time), they would end up 47-50 games won. Last year the experts at a 95% clip picked the hawks to finish 4th-8th seed. One guy pick them 3rd. Hawks had a great year but the playoffs, as was predicted, exposed their weak low post game.

If this issue inst address this year as it wasn’t last year how can you expect a different result? As it stands now the Hawks will be 1 and done next year assuming they make the playoffs. A lot of teams are closing the gap and likewise the hawks are falling back to the middle of the pack.

1) like it or not we are not going to win a championship with a power forward named horford as your center. (sorry Florida fans) he’s neither wise enough, strong enough, big enough nor has the defensive tools necessary to lead us to the promise land. What he brings is a career 12 pts per game, 9 rebounds less than 1/2 a block for every foul he commits. He failed to garner any votes from the league coaches who analyzed his defense lack of skill (ok sautee he got 1 mysterious vote).
He may be a very popular guy, but if you get past the hype and look at the numbers he doesn’t bring very much offensively and is a noodle defensively. Popularity don’t win ball games.

2) It was by design that Teague would sit under Bibby his first year and then split time next year and take over by play offs. Bibby sign a 3 year contract and it was explained that when the hawks drafted a guard what his role would be. To all the Bibby haters. The man has done every thing the Hawks have asked him. In his first year here the man was the #3 3pt shooter and was a contributing factor to the Hawks growth. Yes, his skills are declining but he has always been one of the more intelligent guards in the lead. With all the declining he had a tremendous turnover to assist rate.
Teague has had ample time to get game experience grow up (pull your pants up over your butt), learn about the pro game and watch some of the best guards in the NBA and also play against some. Not only did he see JJ ,Bibby, Crawford but he saw little Nate Robinson shred us under the basket like little Tony Parked did the year before. He should know by now that a good point guard will break down interior post defenses and with his quickness that’s what will be expected of him.
No guard is a rookie at the end of the season. Now with play off experience to boot Teague has this summer to let all this sink in.

Its not “throwing Teague to the wolves”. Its time for Teague to step up, assert his game and shed that “turnover Teague” mentality . He should not be the turnover factory who can be a ball hog and doesn’t know how to run an offense. He should be more refined after last year. He should not be “thrown to the Wolves” he should be a Wolf!

Which brings me to my closing point. Why do blogger take a softy mentality with the hawks? Grandad says ” hold them accountable”. Im for that. There are just too many cop-outs inherent in the Hawks roster to be a serious contender.

Ive never seen an excuse win a Championship.

Woodson 2.0

June 16th, 2010
8:40 am

Samuel

June 16th, 2010
8:25 am

I think what Grandad is saying is the scheme doesnt execute play, players do. Its not about your offensive game plan as much as it is about how you execute….or not.

Getting it done is the bottom line but…I got to both laugh at and agree with :

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
8:23 am

Somebody ask Larry Drew if he can play defense without a CENTER ? To quote Ron Simmons “Damn !”

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
8:41 am

Robdawg08

If JJ leaves (which I doubt), our 1st scoring option will be Horford and 2nd option would be J-Quick.
Inside peanut-butter – Outside Jelly!

Josh Smith would be 3rd. (Duh)! What team are you coaching?

Or, if LD runs the motion offense he describes?

There should be no 1st, 2nd, 3rd options, it should the best shot available with severe ball movement (no dribbling whatsoever) and all the parts in motion moving toward the basket with trigger options to get high percentage shots. That, sound like 5 on 5 to me.

He who moves his butt – has equal opportunity to score!

Woodson 2.0

June 16th, 2010
8:44 am

* if this issue inst addressed

Woodson 2.0

June 16th, 2010
8:44 am

calling all cars

June 16th, 2010
8:46 am

If JJ leaves wouldnt crawford become a number 1 option? Id hate to rely on 12 pts a game from horffy.

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
8:52 am

Cars

If a systematic offensive scheme is implemented? Horford WILL score more than 12 per game!
That is the POINT! To run a system – NOT a play!

calling all cars

June 16th, 2010
8:53 am

if “if” and “ands” were pots and pans, the world would be a kitchen

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:02 am

Horford will get rejected in the paint a lot from true centers blocking his shots. Crawford will be the 6th man, 6th men aren’t your top scorers (or shouldn’t be). If you read what LD is saying, J.Smith will be his go to guy.

Joe Mama

June 16th, 2010
9:02 am

Yeah , Cars, Woodson ran play for Horford last year to which horford increased to 14 pts per game. The problem is horford cannot create his own shot, cannot shot over the bigger center in the post and must be “set up” in order to score. If we really wanted an offensive threat in the low post we could have had Stoudemire Who was and is available. I think hes some where around 21-23 pts per game. He would not need to be set up (that forces every one else to stand around) can create his own shot, draws double teams and can be a real first option.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:08 am

If Hawks could just rewrite history and have drafted C.Paul instead Loaf Williams…

Is it some unwritten rule in stone that the Hawks franchise cannot have a good center ? As Woodson 2.0 says Horford is a PF. He can block shots of other forwards but true centers will use him like a Kotex pad in the paint.

Joe Mama

June 16th, 2010
9:08 am

Josh cant shoot out side, and gets his baskets off the slash and on breaks, picks and rolls but is not a offensive night mare although he is clearly better than horford.

If JJ leaves Crawford is the only man who can create his own shot whether half court or coast to coast.

Having said that I do believe at one time or another Josh will reach super star status. If he gets an outside shot going he will be unstoppable.

If JJ leaves you have to fill that void with Crawford and Moe Evans becomes your sixth man, until the hawks can increase there roster talent. The bottom line is once JJ is gone its slim pickings.

Joe Mama

June 16th, 2010
9:09 am

Loaf William….LOL

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:11 am

@BrittishAnger: “Oh….and haven’t we already argued about what we should be calling Jeff Teague? Something like Lil’ Big Man? Yup…you can drop rook on the 24th if you gotta keep the albatross around his neck…it’s your popcorned vehicle….”

haha

What in the world does this mean MC ? Can we get a translator ?

Joe Mama

June 16th, 2010
9:12 am

I hope you are right about JJ not leaving drmaryb.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:14 am

For proof just force yourself to the horrible memories of D.Howard making all those dunks in the playoffs this year, over Horford. Heck, over Horford,J.Smith,and M.Williams at the same time…

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:17 am

It could work if Hawks had a deadly perimeter shooter Josh could dish ball to when he slashes to the basket and gets triple teamed. But if that guy is Bibby or Teague most likely the shot will be missed.

JC

June 16th, 2010
9:19 am

@Urban – “This ranks as the dumbest move in Hawks history” Really? You’re putting this above the 2005 NBA Draft? You realize we can fire LD at any time if he doesn’t live up to performances and still get Casey or Jackson – it’s not like anyone else is courting them right now. Whereas we have to watch Chris Paul and Deron Williams in every All-Star game for the next decade.

bigdave

June 16th, 2010
9:28 am

bigdave

June 16th, 2010
9:29 am

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
9:32 am

Cars

Your 846 Post began with: ” IF” JJ leaves Josh would be our first option?
Based on your reply? I guess that makes you a pot or a pan!

JC

June 16th, 2010
9:39 am

@drmaryb – without JJ, Horford is our #1 scoring option? What? This season, Crawford averaged 18.0 and Smoove averaged 15.7 to Al’s 14.6 ppg. And implementing an offense with more movement is certainly going to decrease low-post opportunities for Horford to score. Plus, only Hakeem and Wilt have ever led scoring for their team at center.

If Horford becomes our first option on offense, we’re all screwed.

bigdave

June 16th, 2010
9:42 am

do you think Joe is a max contract type player?

Larry Drew: “under the system he is”

MsDee

June 16th, 2010
9:47 am

MC,

How are the draft prospects doing?? I thought we would have heard something about them by now.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:49 am

That’s good stuff Joe Moma ! LMAO.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
9:51 am

Yeah passing on C.Paul & D.Williams to draft a 6th man like Loaf was the worst move ever made by the Hawks (no)braintrust.

calling all cars

June 16th, 2010
9:53 am

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
9:32 am

Cars

Your 846 Post began with: ” IF” JJ leaves Josh would be our first option?
Based on your reply? I guess that makes you a pot or a pan!

Funny, but wrong. I asked if crawford would be our next option. Just a question. As for as the pots and pans. I was just trying to humorously illustrate that we can rely on possibilities or magic dust. While it hasnt been disproven that horford wont score higher in with an offense geared around him it has been proven that he lacks the tool to want to implement such a scheme any way.

I have never been one to build on possibilities but rather on fact and research.

By the way…if “if ” were a fifth, we could get drunk.

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
9:53 am

Robdawg08

I NEVER read or heard L.D. EVER say Josh would be his #1 option? That is a LIE!

How would he know who the #1 option, IF he doesn’t know if JJ will resign or NOT?
Much less, who will make the roster?

Why put your spin on this – or words in his mouth? Go – Figure.

calling all cars

June 16th, 2010
9:55 am

* cant rely

By the way, drmaryb, did I tell you I caught a live alien? Would you like to see him/he/it?

truth serum will now call me Big Gay

June 16th, 2010
9:55 am

Its not “throwing Teague to the wolves”. Its time for Teague to step up, assert his game and shed that “turnover Teague” mentality . He should not be the turnover factory who can be a ball hog and doesn’t know how to run an offense. He should be more refined after last year. He should not be “thrown to the Wolves” he should be a Wolf!

Okay…

1) Don’t you want to know if you have a wolf or not, from day 1? The only way to find out is to throw him out there. And I don’t mean mostly during garbage minutes. During one five game stretch last year, in which Teague got significant minutes, he looked very much like a wolf. The rest of the time, he looked like any rook getting 9 or 10 garbage minutes a game is likely to look. Secondly, explain to me how a guy who averaged 1.7 assists per game, and 0.7 turnovers per game, is a turnover machine. That’s nearly a 2.5 to 1 assist/turnover ratio, which isn’t bad for a rookie, and a guy who some think might not be a “baller.” By the way, it’s not a turnover when you pass the ball to a guy, but he fumbles it and misses his shot…

2) It was by design that Teague would sit under Bibby his first year and then split time next year and take over by play offs. Bibby sign a 3 year contract and it was explained that when the hawks drafted a guard what his role would be.

Really? This is what Sund and Woody agreed on? Looks like somebody has insider knowledge that the rest of us don’t have. Either that, or they are full of it. At any rate, Sund and Gearon both made comments about Teague’s playing time (uh, lack of ) after we got booted from the playoffs and as Woody was told he wouldn’t be extended. Hmmmm….makes the above assertion sound like…BS…

3) Teague has had ample time to get game experience grow up (pull your pants up over your butt), learn about the pro game and watch some of the best guards in the NBA and also play against some. Not only did he see JJ ,Bibby, Crawford but he saw little Nate Robinson shred us under the basket like little Tony Parked did the year before. He should know by now that a good point guard will break down interior post defenses and with his quickness that’s what will be expected of him.

Ample time to watch, less ample time to get game experience. Even Woody said it was hard being a rookie and not getting playing time. But why mention what Woody said when it will only get twisted by someone who can’t accept the truth. Here’s my favorite part:

He should know by now that a good point guard will break down interior post defenses and with his quickness that’s what will be expected of him.

Really? Did he learn that from Bibby? OH, and here I was thinking that there was no such thing as a good pg breaking down our interior post defenses, it was all just Horford sucking as a defender. All this time it was pgs blowing past our perimeter defenders and breaking down our interior defense! FINALLY, the truth is revealed and accepted! What a breakthrough!

….try and back off of THAT one. The only way out of this jam is to tell a bigger, bolder lie than usual, or falsely accuse me of twisting words (instead of quoting you and making you chew, swallow, and digest it). :lol:

4) like it or not we are not going to win a championship with a power forward named horford as your center. (sorry Florida fans) he’s neither wise enough, strong enough, big enough nor has the defensive tools necessary to lead us to the promise land. What he brings is a career 12 pts per game, 9 rebounds less than 1/2 a block for every foul he commits. He failed to garner any votes from the league coaches who analyzed his defense lack of skill (ok sautee he got 1 mysterious vote).
He may be a very popular guy, but if you get past the hype and look at the numbers he doesn’t bring very much offensively and is a noodle defensively. Popularity don’t win ball games.

Half a block for every foul he commits? What the “F” kinda stat is that? And I guess Dwight Howard isn’t wise, strong, tough, or in possession of the necessary defensive tools either, because Orlando hasn’t won the championship either. Didn’t they almost get swept by the team we beat 4 times in the regular season, right after sweeping us? Man, who would have thought it possible that such an awesome center would let that happen. After all, it always comes down to the center and no one else, right?

Looks like the NBA championship is going to be won by either a team with a center with really bad knees, or a team with a center who didn’t make the all-star team (and oddly enough, hurt his knee last night). Either team will win because of either a wing player or a power forward. Go figure.

ILL-logical

June 16th, 2010
9:58 am

If a grade were to be assigned to this story ,it would have to be an incomplete because while the new incumbant head coach,who I am on record as advocating for at least for the last year, had all of the pat answers, he wasn’t asked all of the right questions.

First, while the point guard issue was addressed-but not resolved- there were no questions regarding the center position,especially in the defensive scheme that is yet to be determined.All-Star Al, whose intagibles are clearly a value add to the team, doesn’t appear to have the skill set to be that guy. for all of the talk about his being undersized, let’s not forget how he fared against Kurt Thomas ,who is AAA’s size.

Second, for all of the discussion of Josh’s outside shooting limitations, there was no discussion about about requiring him to address those limitattions in the off season with Mark Price. Changing the offensive scheme is only one part of the calculus-teams will force him away from the basket so he must be able to counter that with some degree of outside shooting proficiency.

Last, but by no means least, is the question of what are the plans if Joe elects not to return? I am an agnostic as to Joe’s value to the team’s future improvement but I do recognize that his departure raises some serious issues. and none of those were explored in the interviews. For whatever reason.

MC: could a brother dig a little deeper?

there he goes again

June 16th, 2010
9:59 am

DRMARYB,

It is a lie. But you have to understand that there is only one person who is posting under several different names, all of whom agree with and appreciate what the so called others are saying. Quite simple and retarded really.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
10:02 am

Maryjblige, read the quotes in this blog from MC. He adresses J.Smith directly. And I said IF JJ DOESN”T RESIGN. (Damn !)

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
10:06 am

What’s your point ? Gasol/Bynum & R. Wallace are all good centers on the championship teams. They don’t have a Zaza Pachulia.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
10:08 am

Hawks don’t have a Kobe Bryant or Paul Pierce much less a Bynum or R.wallace. Oh yeah, we had Rasheed for about a week once…

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
10:09 am

Face it, the Hawks have one player that would start on the Lakers or Celtics 9or Magic,Nuggets,Suns,etc.,etc. for that matter) Al Horford.

robdawg08

June 16th, 2010
10:10 am

Rest of the team is crap to put it bluntly.

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:13 am

truth serum will now call me Big Gay

June 16th, 2010
9:55 am

NO, I will save the big gay for special, well deserved occasions. Actually you and Drmaryb have offered excellent view and I appreciate you guys being here.

OK we disagree on Horford. Nuff said

I wont call you a lier or gay although you may be both. I just say I appreciate that we disagree, point out a case where you are clearly lost and move on.

If you do you research and stop writing with your emotions you will find than horfords foul to block shot ratio is .41 that is for every foul he commits he has .41 blocks. Now you do the math. in order to get to a 1 block( 3X.41= 1.21) it takes 3 fouls for horford.

Sorry

Have a nice day Blue Ray!

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:18 am

And I guess Dwight Howard isn’t wise, strong, tough, or in possession of the necessary defensive tools either, because Orlando hasn’t won the championship either.- Major cop out

They got to the semi final and we did not! whine, whine and mo whine!

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:20 am

there he goes again

June 16th, 2010
9:59 am

Is that the legendary “BROWN OOZE OF UNDERSHORTS” AKA SAUTEE?

Hamp

June 16th, 2010
10:21 am

Many may disagree but losing JJ especially if we sign and trade is a blessing in diguise. He has crippled the team by the Iso and I take it that he hasn’t answered the new coaches call is an indication he doesn’t want to be here. I hope he is not coming back the hawks will be forced to play as a team. Also a lot depends on if Josh came mature as a person and as a player. He needs to listen to coaching if not his game will not get any better.

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:24 am

Yeah teague got close to ten minutes a game. And watch many guards brake Al down in the post so year he should have learned how to break down teams in the post.

Lets not have any of these weak asise feminine excusesl Lets be men and get the job freaking done!
Give teague the ball and either raise up and assert your game on a NBA level or give that spot to some one who will.

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:24 am

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:26 am

Check that they got to the finals because the had a center we did not because we dont!

Woodson Part II

June 16th, 2010
10:26 am

honest_abe

June 16th, 2010
10:28 am

hhhhi, mamamama – my nanananan-name iiiiiii-is THE one and only lalalalallala-LARRY DADADADADADADADADADADADADADADADA- DREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEW!

at least post game press conferences should be entertaining. heh

one really interesting thing LD mentioned was about how marvin is a rhythm player. but with so many hawks players playing 1 on 1 it was almost impossible for him to contribute anything to the team offensively… i always thought marvin would be better suited coming off screens in a motion offense. i can’t wait to see how LD puts this team in a position succeed offensively

Joe Mama

June 16th, 2010
10:28 am

*And watch many guards brake Al down in the post so yea he should have

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
10:31 am

JC

Throw last seasons offensive numbers out the window! That’s the past and that was Mr. Woodson’s system!
Moving forward, L.D. Is describing an offensive scheme (something I have yet to see in the past six years)
My major peeve with that was, there were no clearly defined roles on this team.

If you run a fundamental offensive scheme, the idea is to play inside out: I interpret that to mean, establish an inside game down low and typically involves the #5 then #4 as scoring threats for high percentage baskets. Then it should loosen up the perimeter defense to allow some shots outside the paint. Which to me, means the SG and PG. The wings should be slashing and rebounding at all times.

Since Horford and Josh are our front court, you can do the math.

Response?

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
10:31 am

yeah, I think Im going to let the duck be the first option and every one else will have to pivot of the marv. Hell. Ducks are Birds and so are Hawks… so that my offensive scheme what you think?

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
10:34 am

Response?

LMAO!

question drmaryb, do you thing Al can create his own shot? shoot over centers taller than him? Force bigger centers off the block?

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
10:35 am

honest_abe

June 16th, 2010
10:37 am

woodson part II has the intelligence level of woodson part I… what a dolt

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
10:40 am

“you do you research and stop writing with your emotions you will find than horfords foul to block shot ratio is .41 that is for every foul he commits he has .41 blocks. Now you do the math. in order to get to a 1 block( 3X.41= 1.21) it takes 3 fouls for horford.”

I see the point. In order to handle the post you have to be both aggressive and assertive. You must challenge, block and alter shots. you cant do this and be in foul trouble constantly because it limits your ability to be aggressive.

Also you can tell by that stat that Al is over extending himself prone to commit fouls than get the job done.

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
10:41 am

honest_abe

June 16th, 2010
10:37 am

woodson part II has the intelligence level of woodson part I…an apple never fall far from the tree.

BigTimeTECHFan

June 16th, 2010
10:52 am

Can we sign/trade JJ a get top 5 pick for Cousins from Kentucky
1. Teague
2. Crawford
3. J Smith
4. A Hortford
5. D Cousins

JoJo the Godfather

June 16th, 2010
11:13 am

BTTF….not possible. Other teams can’t even talk about Joe, much less to him, until a week after the draft. No way to use him to get in, or up, in this month’s draft.

Astro Joe

June 16th, 2010
11:16 am

Drew seems to have all of the answers. I especially like the concept that each player is accountable for defending their own man. I’m sure that once he explains that to Jamal Crawford, he will instantaneously become the second coming of Michael Cooper and Bibby magically transforms into Chauncey Billups. No need to develop and implement a defensive scheme when accountability (and Teague) will resolve the issue of poor perimeter defense.

dub366

June 16th, 2010
11:40 am

at lease he has a plan so let’s see what happen.

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
11:49 am

Now thats funny Astro! Couldnt agree more. Changing coaches is not going to change attitudes or raise talent levels.

JoJo excellent points. I guess we will really have to wait and see whats what after the summer because there will be trades and position switches in the draft as well as free agent signings. As it stands now this team will be no better next year than it was this year. Its the same” usual suspects, blue ray, As Obama voiced you cant get different results using the same people and philosophy.

If this team as it stands now were to play out next season Id bet my mortgage that a)they would not better 53 wins and b) the would not advance past the 2nd round.3) They don’t finish in second place.

The hawks are closer to the middle of the pack team than an elite team. In order to get over the hump there has to be some changes at key positions.

JC

June 16th, 2010
11:50 am

@drmaryb, undersized centers who are the number one scoring threats on their team are usually the result of run-and-gun offenses. I don’t know what LD’s new offensive system will be, but I doubt it will involve the break.

Additionally, Horford’s scoring opportunities might go up if we had a solid pass-first floor general like Nash or Kidd, where they could dish to him inside and have him put up uncontested shots. Unless Teague is actually 2008-09 Devin Harris in disguise, I don’t see that happening.

The only way for Horford to increase his scoring opportunities in any offensive scheme LD is likely to implement is to score in the post against centers, something which Woody Part II has pointed out is an uphill battle for Horford.

Don’t get me wrong – I want Horford to be successful. I just don’t think he’s the answer if JJ leaves.

Samuel

June 16th, 2010
11:57 am

2010-11

Orlando
Chicago (assuming they sign LeBron)
Boston
Miami (signs Bosh or JJ)
Washington (Add Wall to: Arenas,Howard,Thorton,Blayche,McGee, Foye,Miller,Livingston ect.)
New York(w JJ or Stodemire or both)
Atlanta/Milwakee/Charlotte
NJ
Philly

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
12:31 pm

“If you run a fundamental offensive scheme, the idea is to play inside out”

That is one way, I think its the best way!

O'Brien

June 16th, 2010
12:33 pm

I agree that as constructed, the Hawks will have a hard time winning the NBA championship. But it can still be done with Al at the 5, and Josh at the 4. However, we definitely need a legitimate defensive center (not ZaZa) to come off the bench.

And for those who want to get on Al, Ben Wallace career average is 6 pts, 10 rebs, and 2 blocks. Perkins career average is 6 pts, 6 rebs, and 2 blocks. Al’s career average is 12 pts, 10 rebs, and 2 blocks. Both Perkins and Wallace have won championships, and been to multiple finals.

And for whoever said Al has a hard time shooting over centers taller than him…really?

Like when he had 25 pts, 19 rebs and 5 blocks against the 7 footer Roy Hibbert? Or when he had 31 points, 6 rebounds against the All star and taller Chris Kaman? Or when he had 17 points and 10 rebounds against Andrew Bogut? Yeah, he sure struggles.

MC,

Any news about workouts?

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
12:38 pm

Often time people worship a player and never deal with reality.

here are Al’s career stats:

Career 229 225 33.3 .527 .143 .753 9.6 2.1 .8 1.1 12.

THE REALITY IS HE BLOCKS 1 SHOT PERGAME

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
12:42 pm

WALLACE WHEN HE WAS YOUNGER AND PERKINS BRING DEFENSE TO THE GAME. THERES NOT A BIG DIFFERENCE IN 6 PTS OR 12.

WHAT MAKE PERKINS AND WALLACE (WHEN HE WAS YOUNGER)IS THE WAY THE INTIMIDATE AND MAN THE MIDDLE. DEFENSE WINS GAMES. THATS WHY PERKINS IS BETTER, IN MY OPINION HE PLAYS DEFENSE.

terrell

June 16th, 2010
12:43 pm

Glad to hear that he’s holding Bibby accountable for defending his own man. Oh did I just say Bibby? Sorry. I meant he’s holding the team accountable. And why is Mario West still on this team? Or in the NBA for that matter?

Woodson Part II (the sequel)

June 16th, 2010
12:44 pm

AND THAT IS WHY PERKINS AND WALLACE GO TO CHAMPIONSHIPS AND FINALS

D-E-F-E-N-S-E!!

Daniel

June 16th, 2010
12:53 pm

Wow the blog has really fallen off the rails here.

Michael- I agree with Ill’s statement earlier that Drew hasn’t been asked the right questions, yet. But mine are slightly different.

I want to here his answer to how he views the season vs. playoffs last year (I want to hear if he will admit the historic collapse in the second round or just coach speak around it.)
I would then ask what were specifically the failings in the playoffs that lead to that historic collapse.
Then, I would ask why if he has the answers now does he consider himself responsible for either not pushing his ideas or not recognizing the situation sooner. What is his responsibility in coaching a team that had the WORST SECOND ROUND DEFEAT IN NBA HISTORY?
Does he just hide behind the “it was all Woody’s fault” ’cause he wouldn’t listen?
If that is true will he listen to his assistants better?
Finally, Why should the fans trust that he has any better solutions to our teams problems when either a) his finger prints were already all over the team’s failures or b) as an assistant for six years he saw the problems but couldn’t(wouldn’t?) fix them?

terrell

June 16th, 2010
12:54 pm

Ramon, Artest signed for the mid-level to play for a championship. Coulda made a lot more if he had’ve went to a scrub team.

terrell

June 16th, 2010
12:57 pm

Is Marvin supposed to be part of the “5 man attack team”? And did Woody actually tell Josh to play on the perimeter? If he likes to play in the post so much, why is he always standing at the 3 pt line?

terrell

June 16th, 2010
1:08 pm

Please stop calling Jeff Teague “the Rook”. OMG!

Samuel

June 16th, 2010
1:22 pm

Yea, and did Woody tell Josh to try to run the break and dribble off his leg or argue every call or JJ to hold the ball despite 3 men guarding him or Marvin to “fall down” so much. Oh yea, he could have benched them and subbed Mo Evans or ZaZa or Joe Smith or Mario West or “Pig Foot” Collins. maybe then we would be in the Finals.

Bird watcher

June 16th, 2010
1:38 pm

I dont think anybody in there right mind expected the hawks to get out of the second round especially with the Howard / Horford match.

every body knew what was up including the hawks who packed it up!

Bird watcher

June 16th, 2010
1:38 pm

Josh has been an excellent finisher on the break!

Ted M

June 16th, 2010
1:56 pm

Did Woodson lack confidence when he was hired? Has any coach for that matter lacked confidence when he was hired?

Big Ray

June 16th, 2010
2:03 pm

Funny as hell listening to the sour grapes types. Flip Saunders got run out of Detroit because he couldn’t get the Pistons players to pay attention to him after a while. Mike Brown apparently couldn’t get the Cavs to do so. Scott Skiles experienced that in Chicago. Same with Woody.

Once the players quit buying into what you’re selling, you have just become ineffective and a waste of money. That’s why so many coaches experience the “short shelf life” in this league. If the players aren’t listening, then why keep you employed? People pay to see the athletes, the guys who do all the things some of y’all correctly keep saying the coach can’t do for them.

Wake me up when a team trades off or signs up guys based on whether or not they will listen to the team’s head coach. Only a handful of guys have that kind of clout, and even then it’s got to be a clear cut case of a disruptive player who is not worth the production he provides.

It’s why Amare Stoudamire hasn’t been traded. It’s why Rick Carlisle is in Dallas, and not Avery Johnson, who if he was as great as people think, would still have a job. It’s why Zach Randolph still makes over $10 million a year.

Stop moaning over Woodson, whose system came into question by the general manager and owners (and players). The same thing will happen to countless more coaches, maybe even Larry Drew. In the meantime, he deserves the chance to see if he can do what Woody did not.

Astro Joe

June 16th, 2010
2:10 pm

Ray, and won’t he get that chance regardless of these comments?

Big Ray

June 16th, 2010
2:13 pm

Yea, and did Woody tell Josh to try to run the break and dribble off his leg or argue every call or JJ to hold the ball despite 3 men guarding him or Marvin to “fall down” so much. Oh yea, he could have benched them and subbed Mo Evans or ZaZa or Joe Smith or Mario West or “Pig Foot” Collins. maybe then we would be in the Finals.

That ain’t the question. The question is why wasn’t Woody able to convince those guys to stop doing things like that? Josh has been creating turnovers off the break and arguing calls for six years. Joe has been holding the ball too long for five years. This starts in practice, and it starts in YEAR ONE. A coach on any level should know that. You don’t have to be a coach to know that.

This is what happens when you allow too much freedom on the court. And if you think the team is going to trade away the players because they won’t listen to the coach, think again. Quit blaming it on having a subpar bench. Our bench is better than the Lakers bench, and that’s a fact.

Marvin Williams’ flops are a direct result of Billy Knight’s flawed “I’m a genius in my own mind” vision. He is good at picking a certain type of forward. Unfortunately, he could not get out of that narrow minded focus. Pick a damn pg and stop listening to your coach who vastly prefers a veteran, shooter-but-not-penetrator, and you might still have a job. That and we wouldn’t be talking about giving the reins to an unproven mid-first-round pick and hoping our highest lottery pick in the last decade can turn into a guy who contributes regularly as a rotation player.

And YES, for those who will inevitably mention it, that would have meant no AL Horford. At least then we wouldn’t have to hear all this rubbish about how he’s not a center, and we need a center, we don’t want an all-star power forward, wah, wah waaaaah!

Big Ray

June 16th, 2010
2:15 pm

Astro Joe,

What, I can’t complain about other people complaining? I can’t be a hypocrite like everybody else? That’s like asking you not to be sarcastic or cynical. Oh, the humanity!

:lol:

Big Ray

June 16th, 2010
2:16 pm

Exit stage left, I’ll be back for more canniblogging later….

Astro Joe

June 16th, 2010
2:35 pm

If success is defined as winning it all, then the vast majority of NBA coaches (and players) are failures. Including a guy with a current Ohio address who dominates free agent talk like he’s f’ing Bill Russell (a perennial Finals winner and MVP for you young bucks).

Samuel

June 16th, 2010
2:40 pm

That easy huh Ray. We’ll see how easy it is, won’t we now. 53 wins and the 2nd round. Any Ole coach can do that. OK

O'Brien

June 16th, 2010
2:53 pm

Samuel,

It’s not all Woody’s fault. But it’s all about accountability, and last I checked, the HC determines who plays, and who doesnt. If the players know that the coach will not do anything about their poor decisions, then they will continue to do whatever they want.

What do you want Rick Sund to do? Trade our all NBA defensive player Josh because he won’t listen to Woody? How about trading our third team all NBA SG because he won’t listen to Woody? Good luck with that.

And let’s say Woody benched Josh for not doing what he was told (and played RandMo instead). Do you think Josh would continue to make the same mistakes if he knew he would be benched? If we benched JJ, and put Mo in, don’t you think JJ would change his ball hogging because he doesn’t want to be benched?

If Woody had benched them, sure, we might have lost extra games, but I think Woody would have had more support from Sund. Woody was the Zoo keeper, and he allowed the animals to run wild.

Ironically enough, if it was all about wins and losses, maybe Woody would still be our coach. But he was so worried about wins and losses he did not reprimand his players. So despite 53 wins, he is unemployed.

Sautee

June 16th, 2010
2:54 pm

Truth-serum,

If I have something to say to you, I’ll do it as Sautee. I don’t have to hide behind a different blog name, and I don’t.

Nice try, but wrong again.

Samuel

June 16th, 2010
3:00 pm

Again, 53 wins and the 2nd round is easy according to you and Big Ray. So easy that only a hand full of teams out of thirty something was able to accomplish it.

Oh yea, but that’s not good enough for us. We want to go to the “NEXT LEVEL” but hire the cheapest thing out there to do it and waffle on paying even “ONE” Max contract.

Mouth will say anything

O'Brien

June 16th, 2010
3:32 pm

Samuel,

I’m not saying it’s easy. And I dont know if Drew is the right hire either, but time will tell. I think it will be very challenging for Drew to win 53 games and get to the second round this season (depending on what Sund does with the roster).

What I am saying, is that despite the winning, there was no accountability. And in the second round, we lost by 101 points combined. As I’ve said before, it’s not all Woody’s fault, because the layers quit on him. And thats unacceptable from professionals.

That being said, it was time for a change, because the players were no longer listening to Woody. And it’s a whole lot easier to change one coach than it is to trade your best players and get something in equal value.

If you were Rick Sund, what would you have done?

doc

June 16th, 2010
3:35 pm

samuel, do you think jj should be paid max for 6 years?

will jj be better for us financially over the long haul as curry is as he sits on the knick bench?

i will say we need jj, not sure he needs us nor do we need him at max. yeah it is a conundrum and arent most of these issues about the same?

sund would have been better off in the long run getting his own man 2 years ago rather than allow the reins to continue in woody’s hands. he did give woody enough rope to hang himself. i would think that woody knew it wasnt all based on wins nor in the dark on expectations. just my thoughts. still think woody is a good man and will get a chance to prove himself better and will probably be better the next time around. for him, i hope so.

Astro Joe

June 16th, 2010
3:56 pm

Woody needed to go, no ifs ands or buts about it. I just wanted a CLEAR upgrade. And right now, there truly is no good reason to believe that his former assistant who couldn’t persuade his boss to do some nifty things, who ultimately took a lower salary than Woody and who spent the last 6 years as one of the voices leading this team with rifts throughout the lockerroom…. is a clear upgrade. That isn’t Drew’s fault, he didn’t hire himself nor set the budget for a head coach. Unfortunately, attentive fans have legit reasons to be skeptical about how the ASG handles their business. And Drew’s hiring didn’t cast a vote in the “I have confidence in my favorite team’s ownership group” bucket.

lewis

June 16th, 2010
4:04 pm

Giving Joe max money would be a horrific investment for the Spirit.
If giving any player max money is even an option for the Spirit, wait a year or two for Carmelo.
At least you’d be giving him the max at age 27 or 28, which beats 29 going on 30.
At that point, Teague is developed, Al and Josh are developed, a big man off the bench has been obtained and JJ has been replaced. Carmelo comes in as the super-star that will sell tickets and win us a championship.

prolly not

I MUS WRITE

June 16th, 2010
4:16 pm

Good one Samuel I may have to steal that one….”Pig Foot Collins” LMAO.

Whts up everybody,Ray,Drmaryb,Astro,Ken Strick,O’brien etc………….. Would love to stay and chat but today is move in day, gotta get my index finger ready for the movers. “Move that here move that there” I hate moving uuuugh!!! Good day

Ramon

June 16th, 2010
4:18 pm

Lewis, I love that idea. Only problem is Carmelo is saying he’s going to sign an extension this offseason.

Ramon

June 16th, 2010
4:19 pm

Also, Crawford, Evans, and Bibby (who’ll be easier to move then) will potentially be off the books, so its nothing to say the Hawks couldn’t sign Joe this season (2-3 mil less than max) and still sign Carmelo if he becomes a free agent.

lewis

June 16th, 2010
4:50 pm

Doc Rivers says Celtics center Kendrick Perkins will miss Game 7.

Boston without Kendrick Perkins semi-closely resembles what Atlanta is on the path of becoming.

Midtown Mike

June 16th, 2010
5:21 pm

Something about Larry Drew just makes me feel good all over, no homo.

jroc

June 16th, 2010
5:24 pm

Looks like its going to be a Lakers Party thursday night.
Celebrate Good Times! Come On! Its a Celebration!

Rondo

June 16th, 2010
5:28 pm

Midtown Mike has just come out the closet………..and he couldn’t find his Hawks jersey.

Brenton Woods

June 16th, 2010
5:30 pm

@lewis

How does Boston without Perkins resemble Atlanta at all?

The Truth

June 16th, 2010
5:41 pm

Since this is not Woody’s team anymore and being that some of us are still in a subconscious state of Woody withdrawal symptoms; to those folks, I say you should get a grip, take a deep breath, relax and find a way to move on (which apparently has been very hard to do). Like participating in an AA group, perhaps we need to turn this Blog into a group therapy session to help these people get pass Woody; so instead of saying something like, “My name is John Doe and I am a recovering alcoholic, they may need to acknowledge something like this, “My name is John Doe and I am a recovering Woody Hater or Lover”. Like an alcoholic, the best way to recover is to acknowledge the problem. As with most alcoholic, these folks want to just blend-in and pretend to be normal, but there is one sure way of spotting them out in this blog group. For example, if bloggers have already pigeon-hold LD (before the 2010-2011 season tip-off) as being Woody Version 2, then they have found refuge in securing a new place for their emotions. Psychologically, they have just transferred their hate or love of Woody from one object to another. They can then proceed to vent in admiration or anger as if nothing has really change. However, the emotions act in an inverse way. For example, those folks who loved Woody will likely hate LD and those folks who hate Woody will likely love LD. Incidentally, to those folks with neutral feelings for either, this does not apply. Yes a healthy amount of concern is expected with any degree of coaching change, but when the emotions are more then casual at this point before LD has even named his staff then this kind of therapy may be necessary.

Rondo

June 16th, 2010
5:47 pm

-LD was under Woody’s regime I wonder will he bring any of Woodys philosphies with him-

Ramon

June 16th, 2010
5:47 pm

I was at working and thought of something. The biggest thing that can be said of Larry Drew is how does Bibby feel about him. For all of Bibby’s fault, he has been around a lot of good coaches in his career (and life @ home). It would be a good argument to say Bibby is one of the smartest players to play for the Hawks since Doc Rivers. If Bibby truly endorses Drew, then I think Drew will do a good job. The reason I say this is because majority of the other players have only played for one or two coaches their entire career (Zaza, Josh, Al, Marvin, Teague, Mario, Randolph,) so they only know he’s better than Woody, nothing more than that. Also, Bibby can possibly become one of the league’s best reserve PGs.

JeJe

June 16th, 2010
6:17 pm

cp

June 16th, 2010
6:40 pm

Looks like the Woodson lovers are going through Woody withdrawal. He is gone get over it. As always the only thing Woodson lovers seem to bring up is that the team won 53 games. Thats nice but it means crap when you get absolutely destroyed in the second round. Hell they barely made it out of the first. The guys stopped listening to him. I guess Sund was supposed to trade the whole team just so he could keep Woodrow here. Woodrow probably coached here 3 years more than any other team would have let him. Like doc and Ken said, Sund gave him the rope and he choked himself. And what could the assistants do if Woodson wouldn’t listen to them. Hell it ain’t like they didn’t try to leave because I think at least 3 tied to get out of here. Drew pretty much said in his press conference what others have tried to say on here, as an assistant all you can do is offer your input its up to the coach to listen or ignore it. Woodson came out numerous times and said his assistants tried to convince him to do other things but he wouldn’t. In the playoffs one of the reporters asked Woodrow was he going to try do something different since his plan wasn’t working. This cat said no and that he was going to keep doing what got them there. Although it was obvious to anybody watching the playoffs that his approach was not working he was too stubborn to even try something new. How much more evidence do you need to see that he rarely if ever used input from others. The reason Woodson no longer coaches this team is his own fault. 6 years as coach still no offensive system, played favorites, didn’t hold everyone accountable, wouldn’t listen to his assistants, lack of adjustments, questionable use of the bench, was always putting guys in the dog house, didst get along with half of the team. All of this and guys are still mad he is gone? Get over it or just wait till he gets a new gig and go support the team he coaches.

Ken Strickland

June 16th, 2010
6:42 pm

Some of you negative minded cry babies are truly pitiful. You can’t see the forest for the trees. I hope none of you never have to deal with what I’m having to deal with. Otherwise, your negative minded attitudes would cause you to succumb to the cancer. To be honest, your negative attitudes are cancers.

ASTRO JOE-are you saying you lack the vision and/or ability to see:

1-benching Bibby,

2-improving the half court OFF by adding options and stressing ball and player movement, and no ISO’s,

3-holding all players accountable,

4-playing traditional man DEF rather than relying on gimmicks,

5-adding more structure and on court discipline,

6-making an effort to make key players more effective and efficient,

7-actually giving players a chance to compete for mins and positions,

8- and not holding players back and penalizing them just because they’re not veterans,

9-and opening the channels of communication between coach and players,

as an upgrade?

FOREST FOR THE TREES!!

It’s sickening to hear all of you psychic Ms. Cleo wannabes predicting all sorts of doom and gloom for the team and it’s new HC, just because the ASG and Sund didn’t rehire or hire the HC you preferred.

The ASG made an excellent assessment, decision, and an excellent choice in hiring LDrew. They saw a Hawks team that made the playoffs 3 consecutive yrs, finished 4th in the East in 08/09 with 47wins, 3rd in the East in 09/10 with 53wins, and made it to the 2nd round the last 2 yrs. They saw a team that accomplished these feats despite having a HC that was stubborn, inflexible, played favorites, didn’t allow competition, hated rookie PG’s, even he ones he drafted, believed in one way communication, relied on a very limited half court OFF, while stating publicly he didn’t give a damn about OFF, and who relied on a gimmick DEF to hide the DEF deficiencies of his favorite none productive player.

With that in mind, they decided to minimize the amount of change that would have taken place by hiring a HC that was unfamiliar with the team, players and organization. In other words, they decided to fix what was wrong with the unit, rather than replace it. It’s not inconceivable that some of the HC candidates might have had issues with one or more of our players, who the ASG and Sund felt strongly about, and suggested getting rid of them. And in the process, they may have succeeded in getting rid of any chance they had of getting the job.

What you negative minded cry babies are doing to new HC LDrew is equivalent to flunking a student before school even starts, just because you don’t like him, or know anything about him. In other words, you’re using your blatant ignorance as a basis for judging him.

Ken Strickland

June 16th, 2010
6:56 pm

CP-AMEN TO THAT!!!! I guess for some,it’s hard to distinguish politics from basketball. Otherwise, how do you explain people actually following, believing, and taking someone like Sarah Palin seriously. Aren’t we still waiting for her to name a single book, magazine or article she’s ever read?

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
7:00 pm

Perkins

Done?

Being a Sports Injury Chiropractorq, I knew Perkins ruptured his knee ligament(s). Either ACL, MCL, PCL, LCL or meniscus (lateral or medial).

Because, it was a non-contact injury, and Perkins said he heard a loud POP!.
The team doctors knew it too because the X-Ray revealed no fracture? They called it a sprain. But, you need a MRI to see the ligaments (soft tissues).

Because of his size and weight, Perk may be looking two years to regain 100%. Also, the knee is weight bearing and a pivot joint and is the most complex joint in the entire body. 3 bones and 6 ligaments totals 9 things that can go wrong. We haven’t even addresed the 3 muscle groups: Quadriceps, Hamstrings and gastrocnemus (calf) muscle involvement.

If the Lakers win, because their center has knee issues too, the Celtics will have less PRIDE next year.
With their aging roster? Doc may dip & the team re-tooled….gives the Hawks a chance to come on strong next season!

Maybe, we can get Ray Allen from them to replace Joe for 2 years and avoid the Max-Pay joe is looking for.
Focus on our other glaring holes and re-tool as well, versus re-building all together.

dashizz357

June 16th, 2010
7:04 pm

Bottom line Drew was the cheapest thing on the market & the Hawks bit on it……I wish Drew all the success and pray’s he does a great job! I don’t see it…..Josh is the problem, not Woodson, managerment is the problem, not Sund! Hawks want to play at the big boy table, but don’t have the big boy money!

Midtown Mike

June 16th, 2010
7:24 pm

you can always trust men with tight, firm handshakes like those two gentleman in the picture. LD has a cute suit too, no homo.

drmaryb

June 16th, 2010
7:29 pm

Dashizz357

Drew was NOT on the market – he was in the BUILDING! He wasn’t hard to find.
There was no: Buyer Beware! No box of chocolates! They KNEW what they were gonna get!

Because, this is his first crack at it, turns out he comes affordable. I call that a WIN – WIN for everyone – Fans included! Why not embrace the positives? Or, does that require too much effort and character?

Ken Strickland

June 16th, 2010
7:36 pm

DASHIZZ357-if what you say is true, and money is the real issue, then getting rid of Woodson was the right move. After all, rehiring him certainly wasn’t going to put any more money in their pockets. So hiring LDrew for less money actually does put more money in their pockets. You WOODY LOVERS need to quit b!tching and making excuses for him. Hell, Josh Smith was an All Star candidate, which is the kind of problem every NBA team wants.

AND IN CASE IT HASN’T REGISTERED WITH YOU YET, WOODSON IS NO LONGER ANYONES PROBLEM.

Astro Joe

June 16th, 2010
7:40 pm

Strickland (get well) and how much doom and gloom were you predicting during the regular season? I am NOT mad at Drew… I hope that he becomes the winningest coach in our franchise’s history. It’s not his fault that after declaring that the relationship with Woody needed to end, the ASG went out and hired his lead assistant. And with the vast number of instances where a failed head coach was replaced by a first time head coach who previously served as an assistant to that failed head coach, i can see why so many are so optimistic. I mean, how many times has that worked out in the last 20 years?

Astro Joe

June 16th, 2010
7:47 pm

I’d also suggest that people who are concerned about Drew may not be lobbyiing for Woody… I know I’m not. Woody needed to be ghost. The question isn’t Woody, the question is the ASG’s decision to hire Drew.

Grandad

June 16th, 2010
8:38 pm

Based on my “limited knowledge” of the search, Drew was not my 1st
choice but neither was he my last. I was and to some degree still am
concerned about RS getting over-ruled.

Having said all that, My impressions of LD have been 100% positive.
He is at leaast addressing what we guys (& gals) have been carping
about for years.

Offense:
movement, player & ball, utilize all 5 guys, attack, play Teaguer.
Defense:
hold “everyone accountable.
Josh:
put his butt near the rim.
Players:
communicate – simple isn’t it.
Philosophy / Plan / System:
He has one.
Who plays?:
competion for pos. & time.

What else could we ask for?

If I were interviewing – I probably would have hired him as well;
based on what I now know.

Go Hawks
&
Hang in there Celts !!!

Grandad

June 16th, 2010
8:44 pm

I swear when I proof it the words arn’t misspelled.
Then the ‘Blog Monster’ – tricky as he is -
picks out one or two and leaves out a letter here & there
or adds one here & there just to make me seem even more
illidioterate.

Rondo

June 16th, 2010
9:00 pm

G-Pops no need 2 b self concious
If the C’s ain’t up at least by six at the end of the third we’re in trouble.We have to jump on the Lakers early and not let them shake loose.

O'Brien

June 16th, 2010
9:17 pm

From ajc.com, talking to Coach Drew;

“We become a five-man attack team. It puts all five guys in position to attack and to score.”

We have heard of the “triangle” offense. I think we should call Drew’s offense the “pentagon” offense.

Ramon,

Good point on Bibby being around good coaches. In college, he won a championship at Arizona for Olsen (sp?), and he played for a very good coach in Rick Adelman in Sacramento (went to the WC finals).

Another reason to talk to Bibby, is I would like to hear his feelings about possibly being benched. I’m sure its hard for a veteran who was a good player for many years to lose their spot to an unproven rookie.

So if he has the right attitude, that will go a long way in helping Drew.

Clyde

June 16th, 2010
9:26 pm

Sautee

June 16th, 2010
9:27 pm

Joe Mama (AKA) Turth Serum

June 16th, 2010
10:18 am

And I guess Dwight Howard isn’t wise, strong, tough, or in possession of the necessary defensive tools either, because Orlando hasn’t won the championship either.- “Major cop out”

“They got to the semi final and we did not! whine, whine and mo whine!”

Geez, the irony is rich, isn’t it?

Is there a bigger whiner in Hawks fandom than Truth-serum?

“Our center isn’t big enough” (whine)

“Horford is a terrible defender” (whine)

“You can’t win a championship without a defensive center protecting the rim”

(whine)

Whining about having an All-Star Center. You have to be an all-time whiner to do that.

Oh yeah, that’s right, he’s only an All-Star because the coaches got together and plotted against the Hawks. (whine)

“Fire Rick Sund” (whine)

“Shoulda kept Woody” (whine)

I could go on for days, but it’s boring as h e l l , really.

But the irony is delicious.

Mystikal

June 16th, 2010
9:32 pm

The hawks will get over the hump when ownership is prepared to really invest in the team. In business you have to spend money to make money, while in this arena sometimes you have to take calculated risks. In the draft we always wait to see who falls to us instead of making moves to get who we want. In free agency, we wait til last minute and let market decide what someone is worth and then often end up gettin left overs. And although I think Drew is a good choice, we just took the cheapest coaching option. If there was a way penny pinching could get you championships I’m sure someone would have written a book by now.

Mike is back

June 16th, 2010
9:33 pm

Enter your comments here

Mike is back

June 16th, 2010
9:35 pm

AJ, I don’t blame LD for the way the ASG conducted their coaching search…I have my trepidation too…but give LD credit…he doesn’t have that deer in the head light look…Dude is coming out swinging…and he got some swagg…U GOTTA LOVE IT.

I don’t see this cat shaving his head, and cutting off his eyebrows to get his team attention. lol

Sautee

June 16th, 2010
9:38 pm

Mike is back,

That’s two good posts today, buddy.

Mike is back

June 16th, 2010
9:39 pm

MC, I see they got the filters running strong…I can’t believe I got one through…tha killing me. lol

Ken Strickland

June 16th, 2010
9:41 pm

ASTRO JOE-regardless of how many times it has or hasn’t worked, each case is different. Hell, suppose PRESIDENT Obama had decided he’d surely fail if he ran for president because of the fact no Black man had ever come close to becoming president of the United States. Quit looking for meaningless stats and excuses to justify unsubstantiated fears and apprehensions. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, AND I MEAN NOTHING, THAT CAN BE LEGITIMATELY POINTED TO THAT SAYS HE WILL NOT SUCCEED.

He has plenty of experience and he certainly wasn’t influenced in any negative way by Woodson and his issues. He actually tried to influence Woodson, to no avail, which might be why he’s thought of so highly by both players and management. If anything, he’s been influenced by seeing the results of Woodson’s failures and unwillingness to do many things that needed to be done.

Over the decades, the Univ of Kentucky basketball has had many highly rated players drafted that ended up having less than stellar NBA careers. Would you let that fact stop you from drafting Walls or Cousins? Would you judge PRiley, LBrown or PJackson’s ability to be effective HC’s based on the fact they’ve all been fired multiple times?

beone

June 16th, 2010
9:48 pm

Drew has been quoted as saying his offense is unique. He has also been quoted as saying that Joe dislikes defending the kind of offense he proposes to run so Joe should like playing offense in his system. While I suppose a small wrinkle in the Princeton or some other movement based offense might qualify it as unique, it seems these two statements contradict one another.

HoosierHawk

June 16th, 2010
9:52 pm

Sign and trade Joe w/ Zaza for Okafor and M. Peterson. Works with salary cap. Or sign and trade Joe for Tyson Chandler. He is a real Center who can play D.

Mike is back

June 16th, 2010
9:56 pm

Sautee, I was finally able to get something through…MC had yo folk shout out.

Ken, I went through a similar ordeal when I first came to the blog…Doc and few others may remember…laughter was my receipt for success. Keep blogging…and keep laughing…it will pull you through.

JeJe

June 16th, 2010
10:10 pm

Joe for Tyson Chandler? LOL. I don’t even think I’d trade Marvin for that injured stiff

heres to Obama

June 16th, 2010
10:13 pm

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
12:04 am

Ken,

It’s BS like that that would get Lawrence Frank or Jay Triano or somebody hired. WOW, you really make it look easy man. Just draw it up on the board and presto 53 wins and a 2nd round playoff series victory.

Doc, if not JJ, then who. Has a team ever won a title without at least one Max player?

No gloom and doom here. Just calling it as I see it. You guys seem to think we won 53 in spite of Woody. I happen to believe the opposite. Our roster is really a middle of the pack group and Woody helped them exceed any reasonable expectations. Time will tell.

Man, I killed them Bass today. 7 keepers 21lbs 6oz. Damn, i’m good.

The Truth

June 17th, 2010
12:23 am

In their rush to resend him, I hope the ASG doesn’t put JJ in this distinguish group

As so many have already mentioned; we can certainly use his talent but not at mortgaging the future of the team. The question is not can we use JJ. The question really is at what cost based on what we already know about him? As for our record being on the line without him:

Sometimes you have to step back to move forward.

Clyde

June 17th, 2010
12:59 am

The real Clyde has retired the FIRE WOODY slogan.

Are the Hawks having a draft party this year?

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
1:01 am

Clyde. You’ll get rich these next few years.

bigdave

June 17th, 2010
1:37 am

“it seems these two statements contradict one another.”

i noticed that as well..

did anyone else know that coach Drew was the first to interview?

doc

June 17th, 2010
1:55 am

ok samuel when do we cook em up. i’ll bring the hush puppy prep and beer or ice tea.

samuel cant say i know who replaces him just i dont know if it hurts us in the end if we max him. my boy rick gets to figure that one out while we eat. heh heh

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
2:14 am

Doc,

I’m saving them for when we win the Gold Ball.LOL!! We’ll have one hellofa fish fry then.
I’m actually with you. If we get a comparable player, i’m ok but something tells me we’ll sign a Salmons level and spin it as a JJ replacement. he’s not that good. That’s why I was pushing for a trade this year cause I could see the writing on the wall. I actually don’t see him signing here even “IF” we offered him max money, which we won’t.

Ken Strickland

June 17th, 2010
2:37 am

MIKE IS BACK-thanks for the encouragement. You don’t know how it makes me feel to hear that from you. A few yrs back, I had a stress induced stroke, and was depressed to the point of wanting to commit suicide. I woke up one morning and sitting in a chair next to my bed was an old flame from my high school days still looking good.

Well, she told me that she had suffered a stroke also, and that I could beat it. Man, that was all I needed to hear. To me, at that moment, she was the most beautiful person in the world, and represented everything that was possible as far as my potential recovery was concerned. I doubt if you’re as physically beautiful as she was, but you’re still beautiful to me in the same way she was with her encouragement and inspiration. THANKS!!!

SAMUEL-for some HC’s and teams, winning 53gms is easy, for others it’s not. And for your information, we did win 53gms in spite of Woodson, which is why ownership decided there was no need to resign him? Both ownership and RSund saw enough during the last 2 trips to the playoffs to know Woodson was totally unable to coach under playoff conditions. They also saw that during the playoffs, the team was unable to over come Woodson and win a single gm, or even be competitive past the 1st rd for 2 consecutive yrs.

The thinking was, this team finished 4th with 47 wins and 3rd with 53 wins, respectively, and advance to the 2nd rd both yrs. And it managed to do it with a stubborn, inflexible, narrow minded HC that insisted on playing a slow, inconsistent, over the hill, DEF liability at PG, and an inconsistent offensively limited SF. How could the team not get better with a HC that’s willing and able to do all of the things Woodson was unwilling and/or unable to do, like get more consistency and production at PG and SF.

I’M SURPRISED YOU CAN’T FIGURE THAT OUR. But I guess you’re still grieving for you beloved WOODY.

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
2:54 am

Perkins

Was worried about not getting a 7th technical and the bigger worry is now a torn MCL and PCL
This a major and very severe injury! You rarely see this type devastating injury in the NBA, maybe in the NFL.

The MCL, (inside knee) and PCL, (back of knee) are a weird combination to say the least, when he landed under the 280 lb. weight of Bynum over his back, the knee buckled on the inside and hyper-extended backwards. That is some nasty ISH! And, there was no foul called on the rebound, for over the back?

I thought the Refs made calls to protect the players? This is turrible – as Charles would say!
I really feel awful for Perkins. Anyone, see Rondo pushing Artest when KG went down hard?
þhat was a great play and technical. Didn’t know Rondo had any emotions like that.
I like the Celtics, they’re close as a group. Give credit to a great coach in Doc Rivers.

I hope we see that same attribute in L.D. Another HC hired with no previous HC experience, but 16 years as an assistant, should give him two legs up on Doc. And, having been with the team 6 years from age 18 years old for Josh and others, has to be a plus!

O'Brien

June 17th, 2010
7:01 am

Samuel,

I’ll say this about Woody. He was a better coach for the regular season, but not a good coach for the playoffs. In my opinion, if we had another coach last season, I don’t think we would have won 53 games (probably win less). But if we had another coach, I don’t think we would have lost by 101 points to Orlando in the second round (games would have been closer). Just my opinion…

Truth,

Looking at the list of overpaid players, you can’t help but wonder what those GMs were thinking. If Philly had offered Josh the 5 years, $80 mil (instead of Brand), would Hawks have matched?

As for the JJ discussion, I would not offer him the max. I agree that there is no way we can replace everything that JJ gives us, and losing him would be a step back. But I’m afraid of giving him a max deal only to see him break down in year 3. And its not like the ASG will have the money to surround him with the players needed to win a championship.

Salmons cannot replace what JJ gives us. But if the choice is Salmons for 3 years, $24 mil, or JJ for 5 years, $90 mil, I think that will be a tough choice to make.

But thats why they pay Rick Sund the big money, to make those decisions. I am looking forward to the off-season.

GT

June 17th, 2010
7:49 am

More of the same, a church picnic with fat ladies and big hats. Josh Smith needs to go.

STFU

June 17th, 2010
8:34 am

KEN WOODSON GONE LET YOUR MIND MOVE ON, DUDE YOU REALLY HAD A HARD ON FOR THE DUDE. GET SOME COUNSELING

DUDE, LETS MOVE FORWARD. DAM. IS THAT YOUR WAKING THOUGHTS?.

Henry

June 17th, 2010
8:38 am

doc

June 17th, 2010
9:03 am

samuel to continue, i will say if we had owners with deeper pockets it would make this all a bit simpler on the math side. we know there is a budget and as in the braves it will be kept. as far as i am concerned, their lack of free cash flow hurt us with chills and will probably hurt us with jj. remember we had mo/flip to replace chills though it was more mo as the cheaper 2/3 alternative off the bench rather than chills. it might come down to signing two to be one instead of jj. i

n the end folks argued chills wouldnt have meant any more wins. as a sixth man i guess one could argue it didnt matter until maybe the post season. in the case of losing jj it will be a harder sell, to say it wont cost us wins. it will also make drew’s job more difficult. if he earns his chops and approaches the won total of 53 without jj then we may be callling him a genius. if he doesnt i am going to repeat that woody was assisted mightily in his quest of 53 wins by essentially having no adversity when it came to injuries. if you remember i said we would finish higher than the celts this year because our team wouldnt have the injury probs the celts would be destined to have without calling us a better team. i think i called it on that one and woody got the benefit of it short term but not in another contract deal as we were not prepared at all to play against the best in the tournament, not at all. that fell at the coaches feet and left him bare in the end to try and say why, other than they were unprepared. not a good enough answer for the asg.

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
9:12 am

KenS.

Menu for today’s dinner:

Four to five fresh whole tomatoes peeled, diced and marinated in one fresh & diced vidalia onion.
Add fresh chopped herbs: sweet basil, minced garlic and cilantro dashed with olive oil for three hours.

Sautee 2 lbs. of talipia fish and add to the tomatoe marinade in a sausce pan.
Simmer for 20 minutes over medium then low heat.

Enjoy your fish and tomatoe stew with a side of old fashioned corn bread and a glass of Ice Tea (slightly sweetened with a hint of brown sugar).

Eat well & Be well – Your LIFE depends on it!
Oh yeah – and keep blogging daily to help heal your Mind – Body & Spirit!

Keep fighting your adversaries: the P.C. Cells, the dumb – founded fake bloggers and the tax collectors!

Mike is back

June 17th, 2010
9:30 am

Ken, thanks bro…glad I could put some sunshine in your day!!

bigdave, yeah, I was surprised LD was the first candidate to get interviewed…I also was surprise to learned that Sund and LD had some history together working in Detroit…that may have help LD case too.

Samuel, I attended one of my best friends Wedding in Miss…Gosh Darn…they got some beautiful women in Miss. They was genuine and pure…the city life hadn’t ruin them…they was nothing like these ATL super stars. I might have to come eat some fish too.lol

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
9:47 am

Grand-Daddy

Haven’t forgotten about you, my Ofc. Manager is on vacation. I’ve been tied up on conference calls for a patient I referred for spinal surgery this week. I promise, to try and call Dr. Pigeon before he closes today.
I did call once but his ofc was closed.

Great to see you’re still a blogging fool!
Mmmmmwah!

Astro Joe

June 17th, 2010
10:00 am

Mike is Back, if Drew makes it to year 4 or 5 of his coaching tenure, let’s see what tricks he pulls out of his hat to motivate his team. Let’s face it, every new coach has a plan. Reggie Theus had a plan. Michael Curry had a plan. Marc Ivaroni had a plan. If you were the head coach of the Hawks, you would have a plan. What I find a little discouraging is that we haven’t read anything that we didn’t already know. We haven’t read anything that leaves us thinking “wow, he has a very deep understanding of this team’s issues”. He has even said “most fans can see the issues with this team”. I need a coach who has been with the squad for 6 years to have a little more insight than what attentivefans see on TV. Surely the lack of effort on defense was more than an accountability issue, was it related to poor practice habits? Were the 4th quarter meltdowns all about a poor offensive scheme (that worked in the 1st 3 quarters) or was poor conditioning an issue? Was Josh playing on the perimeter by design or because he was allowed too much freedom which will be addressed by designing more specific plays? Did we go into iso mode because the coach called those plays or because our PG called those plays too often? Did players stand still in iso mode because that was the design or because they learned not to expect any passes? The analysis we have received thus far goes about 2-3 uinches deep…. about the same as the blogs around here. Where is the root-cause analysis that he uniquely can provide as opposed to any other coaching candidate?

His stated defensive philosophy is “guard your man or else”. Pardon me if that answer leaves me wanting for more.

Grandad

June 17th, 2010
10:05 am

Mary Ellen – bless your heart, thinkin’ about our friend KS.

Grandad

June 17th, 2010
10:08 am

M.E. /*PS – I eat cornbread every day.

JoJo the Godfather

June 17th, 2010
10:28 am

Give me feedback on two trade thoughts….Crawford to Cleveland for Verejao & Parker’s expiring deal….Bibby & Evans to Chicago for Hinrich…Cleveland clears a large contract & Chicago gets another $1M under the cap and has two smaller contracts as trade bait or two veteran bench players. I like Verejao’s defense and intensity off the bench. Hinrich & Parker can defend and hit the 3….Depending on whether Joe comes back or not, Hawks could look like this:

Teague/Hinrich
Johnson/Parker
Williams
Smith/Verejao
Horford/Pachulia
($65M total salaries)

Teague/Hinrich
Brewer(my free agent choice)/Parker
Williams/Childress
Smith/Verejao
Horford/Pachulia
($61M total salaries)

newkid

June 17th, 2010
10:53 am

Wonder what it is about coaches like Popovich, PJackson, and Sloan that players don’t appear to ’stop listening’ to them after 3-4 years. Wonder what it is about managers like Cox, Torre, and Leyland that players don’t appear to ’stop listening’ to them after 3-4 years. Auerbach, Shula, Lombardi, Belichick, Shanahan,…

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
10:54 am

Astro-Man

You hit just about every nail on every head.

In particular, I would like to address the 4th Qrtr meltdown assessment. That is the first plausible explanation I have heard: CONDITIONING? T

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
10:55 am

Ken,

I hope that you beat your latest health episode but in all honesty, judging by your attitude here, you might be bring many of them on your self. You seem to be very bitter and stubborn which can lead to stress which never helps. Humble yourself son and you might be healthier son.

53 wins is easy for some coaches huh. I guess that does put Woody in the elite category then. Brown,SVG,Woody,Phil,Carsisle, Gentry,Karl, Sloan. Pretty good company.

Sure, it’s their money. We’ll see if they did the right thing soon enough.

Ramon

June 17th, 2010
10:56 am

Newkid, long as you’re winning (especially titles) its hard for a player to not listening to anything you say.

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
11:11 am

Astro-Man

Cont’d. (Tech. Difficulty on Blackberry)

CINDITIONING? That warrants a further look – see. Did, you notice at the press conference when Josh walked
through the door way, L.D. Acknowledged his presence and as pictured, patted his belly and said lose 10 lbs and stay off the perimeter and in the paint!

That was the first time I EVER heard anyone mention conditioning: oh wait …. I have heard one blogger say repeatedly that Biibby was FAT & that Collins eats CHEESEBURGERS! Conversely, I also, heard an ABC commentator say that Ray Allen has NOT eaten a cheeseburger in over 8 (maybe more) Years!

What was Mr. Woodson’s philosophy on playing weight and player conditioning. And, more importantly,
Will (and it appears he will), L.D. Be a stickler for these specific issuies. BTW, he himself appears to be in
Fantastic shape! I would make a rule: no fried chicken and cheeseburgers allowed in the building – PERIOD!

Corn Bread? YES! Bring it on! BTW, I rarely eat any bread t all, but If I do? It’s old fashioned cornbread & not that Jiffy cake bread crap either. I make mine from scratch and with steamed cabbage! Mmmm Good!

Now, I’m hungry!

Astro Joe

June 17th, 2010
11:11 am

newkid, what is it about the top 10% of any profession that the other 90% can’t copy? When you figure that out, you’ll be able to buy the Atlanta Hawks because that answer is worth a few billion dollars.

Astro Joe

June 17th, 2010
11:13 am

dr. mary, you lost me at no cheeseburgers. :lol:

GeeMack

June 17th, 2010
11:21 am

Samuel

The comment concerning Ken’s health were totally inappropriate. That’s a real situation, and not a blog topic.

We do this for entertainment. Until you have spent significant time with that man. Please reserve your personal observation concerning someones character make up to yourself.

We could careless about how something happen we only want the healing process to manifest in Ken’s life.

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
11:22 am

I got RayRay by about 10 years on the read meat.

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
11:23 am

Try substituting the corn meal with cream of wheat. Much better on the stomach.

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
11:24 am

Astro Joe

Go to your room and NO cheeseburger for you! Bad Bad Boy! ROF. LOL.

You made some awesome points in that 10:00 Post. Especially the conditioning part!
I would really like to hear more about the teams conditioning program!

I see Kobe and Dwight working out on NBA TV. Tuesday night during the games half-time show, I watched Mr. Aldridge and Dwight do a segment. Dwight works out so much on his body, that the team owner and GM ran him out of the building and told him he was over training his body and to please go home!

Have you ever heard of such a thing? More specifically at Phillips Arena?

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
11:28 am

Why is that. He’s putting all his business on the blog. Just thought id offer my observation. I’m sure it’s nothing he hasn’t herd before.

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
11:51 am

Gee Mack

Get ‘EM! Drop that FOOL!

I didn’t. Know Samuel “rhymes with: Go To Hell!”. Said that ISH?
I just read his Nasty, Demoralizing and In-HUMANE statement: Where is the BLOG monitor when you need one?

Samuel, Sir, your statement was PURE EVIL! There is NO place for you on this BLOG IMHO!
You can take your CRASS comments and “SCROLL ON” to another BLOG somewhere else!
I WILL NEVER read another comment from you! Unfortunately, you can create a new email and change your name and continue on here to continue to be the imposter that you are! But, your soul will be forever remembered as EVIL! You should just leave us ALL alone and pray for yourself and hope you are never stricken with prostate cancer. May God, forgive you as I do as well! But, you Sir are in serious danger as a human being!

May God Bless You!

dap01

June 17th, 2010
11:53 am

Samuel: Your comment to Ken was WAY out of line. Get a clue. This blog and real life are not the same.

If I had to pick one blogger who I agree with most, it would be Ken. But even if I didn’t, I would never say what you said.

terrell

June 17th, 2010
11:54 am

Childress would be a nice fit in Drew’s ball movement offense. Just sayin.

dap01

June 17th, 2010
11:55 am

Who moderates this blog? Check Samuel out!

Ken Strickland

June 17th, 2010
12:04 pm

DRMARYB-you must be psychic. I was told to incorporate more fish into my diet, and not just fried fish, which I love. THANKS FOR THE LOVE MY DEAR!!

I wish more Hawk fans would express the same well wishes and positive attitudes toward our new HC LDrew that you’re expressed towards me. We’re both have a major task ahead of us. He not only has to incorporate a new OFF and DEF, he has to incorporate an entirely new mindset and approach with the players.

It’s been made public that the majority of the players, at the least, weren’t happy with the way things were going under the old regime, even with the overall success the team was having. I certainly hope none of the players have, or end up with, the same negative attitude and apprehension towards LDrew that’s been expressed by some of our fans on these blogs.

LDrew commented that he’d used some of his offensive philosophies during practice sessions, and that all of the players seemed to like it. He also stated that it was up to the HC to decide whether to use what’s available, or what’s been presented. Well, the unwillingness to incorporate any of his OFF into the mainstream OFF might have been what led players to become frustrated and resort to playground ISO’s.

When a better option has been demonstrated to work, and has been made available to you, and you’re not allowed to avail yourself of it, for no logical reason, you do tend to question, and ultimately lose respect for, the person making the decision not to use it. Personally, based on Drew’s offensive philosophy, I can’t wait for next season.

I simply love the idea of having 5 players attacking the DEF, rather than the previous philosophy of having one player trying to attack 5. As far as Teague is concerned, I think he’ll do just fine. I noticed he demonstrated a different attitude towards Woodson than ALaw, when receiving the WOODY TREATMENT. With him, you saw frustration, but with Stuademire and ALaw, you saw more anger and resentment.

Of course, Teague only endured 1yr of that crap, so he’ll likely still have his confidence and motivation intact. And knowing he’ll get an actual opportunity to play more mins and a chance to start, rather than a lot of BS lip service, there has to be a major element of excitement for him entering the upcoming season.

I’m also certain MWilliams will be excited about entering the upcoming season, knowing an offensive system will be installed that won’t render him as nothing more than an after thought.

SAMUEL-if JJ returns, please tell me what HC LDrew could possibly do wrong, or what could go wrong, other than injuries, that could prevent him from coaching the Hawks to 53 or more wins, making the playoffs for the 4th consecutive yr, advancing to the 2nd rd of the playoffs for the 3rd consecutive yr, and actually being competitive?

Dept. of Unintended Irony

June 17th, 2010
12:06 pm

“I hope that you beat your latest health episode but in all honesty, judging by your attitude here, you might be bring many of them on your self. You seem to be very bitter and stubborn which can lead to stress which never helps.”

Enough said.

terrell

June 17th, 2010
12:10 pm

Saw this trade on a forum. Said there were interests from both teams.

Hawks get: Carlos Delfino(expiring contract) and a filler
Bucks get : Josh Childress(s&t)

I’d do it in a heartbeat if the filler was Stackhouse or Mbah a Moute.(Bench depth) Might as well sign Kurt Thomas while were snatching up Bucks players. lol!

Samuel

June 17th, 2010
12:21 pm

You guys got me all wrong. Is the Doctor EVIL if he says the same thing i’m saying? Ken, is alright with me and if he takes my advise he might just beat that cancer. If he listens to those who tells him what he wants to hear, he’ll probably go on the same old way. We all have to overcome adversity but the majority of the health issues we face are due to bad eating habits which have been passed down from generation to generation. Ken, should know that since he studies African history.

Ken, there’s a lot can go wrong when it’s your first job at anything. Coaching is no different. LD will go through growing pains, count on it. Again, 53 wins and a 1st round victory is no joke.

People here are criticizing Woody’s conditioning and all that but at the same time admitting that the Hawks were one of the healthiest in the league. I’m sure that was in spite of Woody too. Of course.

drmaryb

June 17th, 2010
1:06 pm

Ken S.

Yes, and I read on a cancer treatment web-site that cooked tomatoes has tremendous impact on killing the
P.C. cells as well! I sent you that link already.

I am really warming to our new HC. I have always supported whoever the HC has been regardless.
As a fan, I don’t want to ge the GM too. Besides, I have no insight into the team’s day to day operations nor the behind the scenes practices and locker room environments!

I just want to see a great team play great and not turn it into my job to fix their issues!
I have issues of my own in my own reality.

Just put a WINNER on the court and I’ll worry about the tickets, popcorn, cherry-cokes and transportation.

Ken Strickland

June 17th, 2010
1:38 pm

SAMUEL-this isn’t a new job for LDrew, just a new position, or a promotion if you will. Other than him now having the final say, there’s nothing new about this job for him. The biggest adversity he’s had to deal with over the last 6yrs has been trying to get a stubborn, bone headed, insecure, inflexible MWoodson to listen and try something new or different.

I truly appreciate your concern for my health, but if following your advice means getting high off sniffing Woodson’s jock and thinking no other human could have possibly accomplished what he did with the Hawks, or obsessing over MWilliams and blaming him for everything but ticket prices, then I’ll pass.

As far as me having a negative attitude, you’re waaaay off base. I’ve already taken a positive approach to fighting this thing, and I started by changing my diet. My car no longer automatically turns into Krispy Kreme when the red light is on. Instead of always trying to find out if I can ONLY EAT JUST ONE, I stopped eating potato chips and dip. I’m cutting out soda’s and fried foods. I’m trying to limit what I eat to things that brings pleasure to others. Oh damn, did I just say that? Focus Strick, focus.

And you’re right. In ancient Egypt, the first thing doctors explored when diagnosing certain ailments in a patient was their diet. There was a story about Europeans coming into contact with a group of East Africans. When they sat down to find out more about each other, the 1st thing the Africans inquired about was their life span and diet.

The Europeans proudly stated that they lived an average of 70-80yrs. The Africans shook their heads and asked what did they eat, and they told them a lot of meat, particularly red meat. The Europeans then asked the Africans how long did they usually live, and they said they averaged over 100yrs. They told them their diet consisted mostly of fish, fruits, vegetables and cows blood.

From a medical standpoint, the US is considered to be one of the most advanced countries in the world, if not the most advanced. It also has the distinction of having as many diseases and ailments, if not more, than any other country in the world.

Look, I never disliked MWoodson. In fact, I was one of his biggest supporters in the beginning, just ask CLYDE. But I did dislike some of the things he ended up doing, and/or refused to do. I feel really good about the prospects for the Hawks future under LDrew. HOW CAN WE NOT IMPROVE IF WE:

1-involve all 5 players on the floor in the OFF,

2-involve the bench more,

3-commit to playing an uptempo style of OFF,

4-make all players accountable on and off the court,

5-eliminate favoritism and incorporate competition for mins,

6-play solid man DEF rather than resorting to gimmicks,

7-make adjustments and changes when needed(STRATEGY),

8-create and/or exploit favorable match ups, while eliminating or avoiding unfavorable match ups,

9-instill more discipline and leadership.

10-upgrade our OFF and DEF.

I am so damned excited about what we have to look forward to this season. If money isn’t the only thing JJ is interested in, then he’ll likely resign. GO HAWKS, AND GO LDREW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mike is back

June 17th, 2010
1:42 pm

AJ, LD doesn’t look like A MAGICIAN., and I’m not looking for any MAGIC. These guy will have to buy in, or it will be all for not.

HECK, if he makes it through the first four months…he would be making progress. With building a staff, FA, and the draft on his doorsteps…he might be a tad busy…again, give him credit…he’s hit ground running. Finally someone with a pulse. I WANT TO SEE WHATZUP!!

Surely, there is time for more specific…after he has address these pressing issues. lol

CMON MAN. heh heh

Mike is back

June 17th, 2010
1:50 pm

Dang AJ, you did it again…made me beat up another blog…you win dawg!!

I’ll go back to sour grapes Samuel…he’s probably still sobbing over Woody.lol

Ken Strickland

June 17th, 2010
1:56 pm

MIKE IS BACK-your last comment has be laughing as I type, WELCOME BACK, MAN!!

bigdave

June 17th, 2010
2:57 pm

good post Strick…

Go Hawks! Go Coach Drew!