
Can Haywood really be had for the mid-level?
The Hawks say they are looking to free agency instead of the draft for frontcourt help. At this point it’s not clear if that need supersedes their desire for a starting-caliber point guard (in case the Jeff Teague thing doesn’t yield immediate fruits) or wing player (in case J.J. bolts in free agency). This is especially the case since the returning frontcourt (Al, Josh, and Zaza) might be a stronger group than the returning backcourt (Bibby, Jamal, Marvin and Teague).
But since the draft doesn’t look like it will yield a big man who can contribute now at pick No. 24, and Jason Collins and Randolph Morris both are free agents, the Hawks will need a center one way or the other. Let’s assume they won’t go the vet-minimum route this time and will actually use their mid-level exception to seek a starting-caliber center (neither assumption is safe, but let’s just say both are plausible). What kind of center could the Hawks expect to acquire in free agency this summer?
First, let me say that trying to predict the market for free agents this summer is tricky. With so many teams potentially having so much cap space (and presumably a desire to spend the money) so-so players might find a strong market for their services. Add in the fact that the focus here is free-agent centers in a league where “quality big man” is usually near the top of the list of wants for most teams in the league, and it makes things even more unpredictable.
(To illustrate that point, see this quote from Magic GM Otis Smith explaining why he used the full mid-level exception last year to re-sign Marcin Gortat, a backup center of modest accomplishment: “Like I said before, we’re in a league that probably only has 10 centers. We just happen to have two. It’s a luxury.”)
But we can look at what happened with free agent centers in years past to get some kind of feel for what the market might dictate. Then I’ll look at some of the free-agent centers for a clue as to what the Hawks might reasonably find available for the mid-level exception.
In 2008, centers Emeka Okafor and Andrew Bogut got the big money, with each signing five-year deals averaging $12 million . Bogut signed an extension before the final year of his rookie contract. The Bobcats signed Okafor to the deal after it had extended a one-year qualifying offer for $7.1 million and after DeSagna Diop turned down their contract starting at the mid-level.
Diop signed a comparable deal with Dallas, so he is the kind of center the full mid-level got you in 2008. But the market was different back then. There were only four or five teams with enough salary-cap space to add players with significant salaries, compared with eight or nine that could do so this summer. So if a salary starting at $5.6 million got you Diop back then, a salary starting at $5.73 million (Larry Coon’s estimate for the mid-level in 2010-11) may not get you even that much now.
Last summer the Cavs signed Anderson Varejao to a deal worth a bit more than the mid-level with five years guaranteed. The Magic matched the offer sheet Gortat signed with Dallas for the full mid-level. And Boston added Rasheed Wallace using their full mid-level exception (yeah, I know, ‘Sheed ain’t exactly a banger in the post but he’s savvy enough to play center as he showed against Dwight Howard). Once again the market was different in 2009, with not so many teams with significant cap space, but it’s a starting point.
That gives us a list of free-agent, mid-level centers (or in Varejao’s case, near it) over the last two years that includes Diop, Varejao, Gortat and Wallace. Looking at how they compared statistically in 2009-10, it seems the Celtics overpayed for ‘Sheed, but then again what they really paid for is what he’s doing now in the playoffs.
So with those four players as the baseline, which 2010 NBA free-agent centers compare as far as their production while also taking their age into account? After crunching the numbers and considering the market, my (subjective) list includes Brendan Haywood, Shaquille O’Neal, Joel Przybilla, Brad Miller and Darko Milicic. Now, like I said, perhaps interest from with salary-cap space drives up the price of these players, or maybe teams they aren’t even worth the full mid-level at this point, but I’m putting them out there for comparison and discussion (hey, it’s June 1 and things are quiet).
The best (realistic) option among the group might be Haywood, who made $6 million this season. He will be 31 in November, which makes him about three years older than Varejao was when he got his deal from Cleveland. So even if he finds his market value inflated he may not be able to attract more than the mid-level, particularly if he wants three years or more.
Haywood and Varejao have remarkably similar statistical profiles. Haywood has a comparable player efficiency rating, rebounding percentage, true shooting percentage and is a better shot-blocker. Varejao is a more effective passer and gets more steals.
Haywood is better than Diop, who turns 29 next January (though he should have plenty of tread left with an average of 14.3 minutes in 536 games). Przybilla (who has a $7.4 million player option for 2009-10) turns 31 before next season; he had a good year in 2008-09 but wasn’t productive during an injury-marred season in 2009-10.
Miller, 34, fell off this season. Shaq actually had a pretty efficient year but age, injury and motivation are concerns so his days of big money are over. Darko ($7.5 million) is still only 24-years old if you can believe that but he’s still mostly about size and potential and isn’t really a willing defender or rebounder.
Haywood, by the way, said he wants to re-sign with the Mavericks. Apparently, watching old and injured Erick Dampier start over him didn’t sour him on his experience in Dallas. The Mavs, who hold Haywood’s Bird Rights, apparently are high on him. Coach Rick Carlisle to NBA.com:
“It’s very important to get Haywood re-signed. I really liked what he did for us. He’s a guy that had an impact on both ends. At 30 years old, he’s relatively young for a center. Centers tend to play for a very long time…Brendan is very athletic. He’s got a good feel for the game. He’s got a good knowledge of the game.”
Some other potential free-agent centers who likely won’t get the full mid-level if they hit the market: Channing Frye ($2.08 million player option for 2010-11), Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Nenad Krstic ($5.4 million player option for 2010-11), Chris Wilcox ($3 million player option for 2010-11), Ben Wallace, and Theo Ratliff.
A full list of free agents by position is available at Hoopsworld.com.
– All appears calm on the coaching search front with ASG’s Michael Gearon Jr. away on business until next week. Mark Jackson interviewed over the weekend but he still looks to be a long shot due to his lack of coaching experience.
MC
397 comments Add your comment
HawkKingBibby
June 1st, 2010
3:05 pm
first
HawkKingBibby
June 1st, 2010
3:13 pm
There is a peception out there that Sund may want Casey while Gearon likes Avery who Sund feels wants some of Sunds power either now or in the near future. Is this just speculation?
HawkKingBibby
June 1st, 2010
3:18 pm
As bad as the Hawks could use a center I dont think Brenda is the guy.
Reggie
June 1st, 2010
3:22 pm
Any Chance the Hawks could trade for a Bigman like say Andris Biedrins from Golden State or Samuel Dalembert from the 76ers?
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
3:31 pm
@HawkKingBibby: from what i know, that’s mostly speculation. remember, Gearon Jr. gives Sund autonomy so they wouldn’t bring in a guy Sund doesn’t want. apparently the power thing hasn’t come up much if at all with the Hawks and Avery and the Hawks wouldn’t be receptive if it did.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
3:31 pm
So all is quiet on the coaching segment, eh? Oh joy-gasm….
If there is one name I’d not mind picking up from that entire group, considering both age and productivity, it’s Nenad Krstic. If he remains healthy. Maybe. Otherwise, you’re picking up older guys who you really need if you’re making a big push in the playoffs. If Joe goes, we probably aren’t doing that.
I don’t have a problem with Dalembert or Biedrins. However, you only get either guy in trade if you’re giving up Al or Josh. Same ol’, same ol’…
ryan
June 1st, 2010
3:32 pm
I like Brad Miller and Big Z .
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
3:33 pm
MC ,
I think the ASG are more sold on Sund than they were Knight. Of course, that’s speculation, but something about the situation makes me think this is so.
I sure hope we can sign a better pivot than we have in the past, and it would be nice to get this new head coach thing on the road already. But that’s just me and my impatient self.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
3:41 pm
@Reggie: they could swing a sign-and-trade if they are over the cap when the deal happens. they could also clear as much as $8.1 million in cap space to make a trade without the exception. when looking at trades, you first have to determine if it will work under the restrictions of the CBA. then you have to keep in mind the goals of each team. Biedrins has three years and $27 million left so if GS were looking to dump a long-term contract he might be in play for teams willing to send a guy with an expiring deal and/or a young, promising player–these tend to be the most valuable chips. Dalembert has an expiring contract in 2010-11 which means he could be dealt but Philly could probably get some nice pieces in return.
HawkKingBibby
June 1st, 2010
3:41 pm
MC have you or anyone you know tried to contact JJ to see what he knows or get his take on this power summit rumor?
HawkKingBibby
June 1st, 2010
3:43 pm
Im not trying to ignore the big man talk but it seems our 1st step this offseason cant even be made until we know whether JJ is coming back. If JJ waits around to see what goes down with Lebron Wade etc this could hold up alot of the Hawks plans.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
3:43 pm
@ Big Ray: my conversations with Gearon Jr. bear that out. he seems to have complete trust in Sund to do the right thing. that doesn’t mean he won’t play devil’s advocate if he’s not totally sold on something but it seems he believes in Sund.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
3:45 pm
@HawkKingBibby: i’ve tried to get JJ. i don’t know him very well since i just got here but from what i hear he’s notoriously tough to reach in the offseason, even for his teammates. i’m assuming we will hear from him or his people once it gets closer to July 1.
Reggie
June 1st, 2010
3:56 pm
If Josh Childress comes back from Greece; how much trade value do you think he would have around the league? I think the Hawks can get a good piece for him
Reggie
June 1st, 2010
3:57 pm
is it even possible that Josh Childress could play for the Hawks next season
Mike is back
June 1st, 2010
3:57 pm
MC, thanks for the update, if we can keep Morris at a bargain basement price…he might be worth holding on to. Maybe a new coach can at lease get out of RandMo…what we are getting out of Zaza.
Big Ray, ditto on Nenad Krstic…he was very effective in the post, before all the injuries. I would also consider bring Theo Ratliff back…if we could not get Haywood or Krtic.
The Solution
June 1st, 2010
4:23 pm
What about gasol from memphis…I say look for some sort of trade. he is 25 and gets 14 points and 9 rebounds and 1.6 blocks. trade trade smith marvin or chill or some sort of package deal to get him. who ever is left out of the three can play the 3 or resign jj and move him to the 3 and start crawford @ the 2.
jroc
June 1st, 2010
4:27 pm
Wilcox would be a good pick up for the hawks he is more active and tougher than Haywood.Really MC are there any true centers in the nba.All the guys over seven feet are injury prone and are stiffs.Dwight has No post moves still a very raw talent for a true center.I think the hawks would get by with just having an acive 6′10 guy that can get a rebound or get a put back here or there and a few blocks here or there.
lewis
June 1st, 2010
4:27 pm
Lebron told Larry King cleveland has the edge.
Lebron is not leaving cleveland.
Joe is leaving Atlanta.
I was talking to a buddy of mine about it, telling him that our best bet would be to get Hinrich and Taj for JJ, trade Taj + Zaza for M. Gasol.
But he’s telling me that Gasol is a UFA, possible player option for next year?
Memphis is almost cheaper than the hawks, i don’t know that they’ll match a solid offer.
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
4:27 pm
I would be willing to give Haywood a nice size chunk of the mid-level exception depending on how well the physical went. At the same time I would be on the phone begging teams to take Bibby in a trade, and if it took packaging the newly crowned 6th man of the year with him, I’d be all for that also!
Can anyone tell me how good Felton is on pressuring the ball up the court? I think going forward Felton and Teague would be a nice tandem at the point guard spot that wouldn’t cost too much, and still be effective.
ajw
June 1st, 2010
4:29 pm
Brad Miller would fit in nicely with the Hawks. We need a good passer in the post. Plus he has a nice elbow shot to open up for Josh and Al on offense. He also has a tough attitude which pisses off opponents.
cdog
June 1st, 2010
4:30 pm
wishful thinking on everyone’s part about big men.the fact of the matter, you’re still dealing with rick sund,who’s cherishes money and control over winning a championship.instead of blaming mike woodson last year, had he did what winning GMs like danny ainge and laker owners would have done and bring in the neccessary pieces, the hawks would have still be playing now instead of losing in 4 games to orlando which he then made woodson the scpegoat when he was the reason for the teams failures.
Fundamentals
June 1st, 2010
4:44 pm
Teams like the Spurs prove year after year to have an eye for talent. We need to employ the best scouts to scour summer leagues and camps for some rising talent either from overseas, the D-League or the draft. We don’t have $$ to sign anyone and we all know anyone isn’t really available. It’s risky, but something we must investigate persistently.
We all gotta realize JJ is going to hold out till he knows our coach and he knows his options. It’ll probably be like Josh where we wait all summer and then get him on a reasonable deal. We don’t want to overbid like we did with Bibby and Marvin. Hopefully Marvin will flourish under a new coach. Hopefully JJ and JChill will want to be here as well.
Felton would be a good assett to pick up to partner with Teague. We need competition to spur growth, but we also need folks to be rewarded for their efforts.
I think Morris is worth another shot if the new coach will use him. Collins would’ve been funtional if used in the rotation. Using like we did on such a limited basis was unfair to him last year. ZaZa’s efforts will be based on team chemistry. We gelled too early last year and fell apart when it mattered.
cp
June 1st, 2010
4:47 pm
cdig im now convinced that you’re related to Woodson. You defend the dude more than Samuel and northcyde combined. Dude he is gone get over it. If Woodson was this great coach as you seem to make it then why aren’t teams knocking down his door trying to hire him? You know why? He was exposed in the playoffs yet you and only a few on here don’t seem to understand that.
ntrigue
June 1st, 2010
4:49 pm
Have you heard if Steve Smith is getting consideration? If /mark Jackson is getting some consideration why not Steve Smith MC?
Fundamentals
June 1st, 2010
4:55 pm
ntrigue – called for that for months now. Smitty is the next opportunity to sign “Doc”. We slighted Doc in the past, see what he did? I think Smitty can put it together here if givent the chance. Great guy, well respected, deserving of a chance.
Who would have a better handle on how to get guys like Joe and Jamal the ball in the right spots? Solid player, solid man. AMEN to hiring Smitty!
Rufus1
June 1st, 2010
4:59 pm
I want a cheap Center!!!
DJ Mbenga, Ian Mahinmi, Etan Thomas or Fabricio Oberto…We just need tall bodies.
The Hawks have enough talent offensively, we just need size and deepth..I would prefer Ian Mahinmi and DJ Mbenga, because they both make about 1mil a year.
Bring Sergiy Gladyr the 6′5″ PG/SG and let him battle Teague for the PG spot and sign Wes Mathews or Kyle Korver with the Midlevel exception(If JJ leaves)
P.S I respect ASG’s business model, we can’t all be Billionaires
P.S JJ is coming back…the best place for him is ATL. Only New York would offer him a max deal and he values his privacy too much to live in New York..
Rufus1
June 1st, 2010
5:13 pm
Hinrich, Deng and Turgalou SUCK…They all make more money than Marvin and are NO BETTER. Some of you think they are better, but you need to listen to what their cities say about them…it will sound very familiar to what we say about Marvin.
The team regret the contracts they gave those players, so why would we want them. When they talk about the core of the the Bulls, they say ROSE and NOAH. In Toronto, they Booed Turgalou…Otis Smith wasn’t fooled.
tyger
June 1st, 2010
5:23 pm
1. Hawks need to trade up for Wesley Johnson, Syracuse – whole package.
2. Shaq would help us tremendously, we don’t need the old Shaq, we just need Shaq.
3. Randolph Morris is the best young center available. Hawks are absolute fools to lose him.
4. Channing Frye would be a helluva stretch 4/3 not a center however. Does make us longer.
5. Who signed Mike Bibby for 3yrs./$18M???
ILL-logical
June 1st, 2010
5:32 pm
Thank you MC for the analysis and research for this blog entry,it establishes some much needed perspective on the coming year and the challenges the Hawks face. What is even more critical, in my opinion, is context: what are the teams goals for the next season?
Are they trying to win a championship or is the goal the “flacid
make some noise in the playoffs”? Establishing a clear and measurable goal allows for accountability for the fans, management and the players. The fans and the players both will have a clearer understanding of the free agent / draft decisions made by management if the context of their selection is clearly stated upfront.
ntrigue
June 1st, 2010
5:40 pm
Fundamentalz- I dont know how we ever let Doc get away from us just doesnt make any sense! Steve Smith would be a great coach and when listening to him speak he has an high basketball iq higher than Mark Jackson and all the other basketball analists
terrell
June 1st, 2010
5:42 pm
I guarantee you that they’ll be a big man taken after #24 that will contribute as a rookie. Hawks just suck at scouting. I could find a better big than Zaza after #24 my damn self. MC, you sound as if you agree with that perception.
terrell
June 1st, 2010
5:44 pm
Forget Haywood. Bring in Kurt Thomas. We need some toughness.
O'Brien
June 1st, 2010
5:51 pm
I think the trade market should be explored for ZaZa. His contract is not bad, and he is still young. But given our frontcourt, we need a more physical (backup) center.
In free agency, my pick would be Brad Miller. Although he made $12.5 mil last year, he is 34 years old, and his play is declining. So maybe he is available for the mid-level exception (although you wonder if Chicago wants him back).
Haywood would be my second choice, but I don’t see money being an object for Mark Cuban, so I think Haywood goes back to Dallas. I also like Nenad Kristic, but I am concerned about is injuries (3 of the last 4 seasons).
To round out our big man depth, two of the bigs I like are DJ Mbenga, and Johan Petro (or we can bring RandMo back). They would not be in the regular rotation, but when somebody gets in foul trouble, or if they need to fill in for a few games, I think one of these 2 guys would work. And they can probably be had for less than $1.5 mil per year.
terrell
June 1st, 2010
5:54 pm
I’d take Przybilla over Haywood.
Jody
June 1st, 2010
5:59 pm
Hopefully, the Hawks came away with the right conclusions from the Boston-Orlando series. You’ve got to be able to defend and rebound at a high level to win in the post season and having legitimate size inside (AT ALL TIMES) goes a long way in accomplishing that. Simply looking to acquire a 10 to 15 minute backup won’t cut it.
As far as the coaching situation is concerned, the ASG should be very leery of allowing the GM to create a situation where there are no effective checks and balances to his personnel decisions from the coach (essentially the coach is a yes man). If you hire Avery, I think you’d avoid that as he has no reason to be a yes man for the GM and would challenge the Hawks to make good player personnel decisions basketball wise and not just from a dollar and cents standpoint.
Daniel
June 1st, 2010
6:03 pm
tyger- you have lost all credibility. “Randolph Morris is the best young center available”?!?!!!- wait, you were being sarcastic right?
Ill- what would your goal for next season be? This is going to be a difficult off season to assess. Particularly with the Celtics in the championship. We owned them during the season. Is this team close and just needs better leadership and match ups? I think so, but it would be impossible to make the goal to win a championship when we were eliminated in historic fashion during the second round.
MC- We always could use more front court help, and I actually like Pryzbilla (coming off injury and down year, might be cheaper) Ultimately, we NEED a playmaker at point. I like Teague, but like everyone else including the orginization, we have no idea if he is the real deal or not.
Daniel
June 1st, 2010
6:06 pm
I think bringing up Steve Smih’s name is very ineresting. I too wonder what his coaching aspirations are? I have not even heard if he is interested in coaching.
Prison Mike
June 1st, 2010
6:07 pm
With all this talk about big men, what are they going to do with zaza. I can’t imagine zaza getting much if any playing time if haywood signs.
If avery is signed, let’s say I don’t feel he would be very keen on zaza at all.
cp
June 1st, 2010
6:09 pm
I just saw an interview Teague did on Hawks.com. He said he was going to go home for a week then come back and work out this summer. Said that he had a lot of work to do. Nice to see the kid has a strong work ethic. I hope he is in the gym with Price and shooting a lot of jumpers.
Theo Ratliff
June 1st, 2010
6:12 pm
How long have I been playing in the NBA? Well, I was playing when the “Chocolate Thunder, Rim-Shaking, Earth Quaking dunk happened. And, how many NBA teams have I played for? How many NBA teams are there?
Jody
June 1st, 2010
6:12 pm
Also, if you note, this blog article wasn’t exactly talking about seeking a backup center. Combined with the comments Horford’s made in recent weeks about wanting to move to power forward, I think this is very interesting.
Rod from College Park
June 1st, 2010
6:15 pm
Rufus1,
“Hinrich, Deng and Turgalou SUCK…They all make more money than Marvin and are NO BETTER. Some of you think they are better, but you need to listen to what their cities say about them…it will sound very familiar to what we say about Marvin.”
They are actually all better than Marvin. Ask yourself this question, if Turk was on our team this year, would teams be able to leave him wide opeen like they did Marvin. Would you rather Marvin wide open for that corner 3 or Turk? Sometimes, you can’t look at numbers, you have to understand basketball a little. If the Hawks actually looked at numbers, do you think we would have traded for Jamal this year. Turk in Atlanta this year, barring injury would have been just as effective as he was last year in Orlando, because he could have run that point forward like he did with Orlando, and no team in their right mind would leave him open like they do Marvin. This in turn would lead to easier shots for Joe, Bibby….. He also can post smaller guys, (something Marvin can’t do) and score on a regular basis out of the post. Sometimes when guys are in bad situations, believe it or not, they have no desire to perform to their best ability. Jamal Crawford is the greatest example of that this year.
Grandad
June 1st, 2010
6:23 pm
DJ Mbenga made less than a mil this yr. [perfect fit with us]
Haywood is nice but not a cent over 6 mil.[Cuban takes him]
If Joe leaves & we get Hinrich in S&T then,
that’s not the worst thing that’s ever happened.
Someone asked about Felton…
Lowry better & less expensive + great tag team with Teaguer.
[Teague the starter - of course] Lowry plays his tail off !
Najeh Davenpoop
June 1st, 2010
6:28 pm
“After crunching the numbers and considering the market, my (subjective) list includes Brendan Haywood, Shaquille O’Neal, Joel Przybilla, Brad Miller and Darko Milicic.”
I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Darko wants to go back to Europe. Miller has never been a great defender, even in his prime, and it seems to me the Hawks should be looking defense-first when looking for their big man. Shaq’s front-running history tells me he’s going to follow LeBron or Wade somewhere.
This leaves Haywood and Przybilla, who are both good defenders and would both fill the Hawks’ need at center. The Mavs and Haywood probably have mutual interest because Erick Dampier’s contract expires next year, meaning even if Haywood re-ups there long term, he’s probably not going to be a backup for too long; knowing Mark Cuban’s history, he will be more than willing to overpay Haywood to keep him. The Blazers would have an interest in keeping Przybilla, even coming off the injury and even with Marcus Camby on the roster, because of Oden’s injury issues, but I’m guessing they won’t break the bank to keep him either.
So although Haywood would be a better option for the Hawks, Przybilla is probably a more likely and more affordable target.
I’m all for addressing needs through free agency and targeting the best player available in the first round of the draft, where contracts are guaranteed, but I hope that doesn’t mean the Hawks are ruling out the possibility of picking a player at a need position if they are actually worth being picked at that spot, like Dexter Pittman will be in the 2nd round.
JSS
June 1st, 2010
6:37 pm
My goodness, just bring Siler’s back for the last center spot… He played very well in China… My grace, he can be had cheaply and he bangs!
Najeh Davenpoop
June 1st, 2010
6:37 pm
“i’ve tried to get JJ. i don’t know him very well since i just got here but from what i hear he’s notoriously tough to reach in the offseason, even for his teammates.”
So he’s tough to reach for his teammates, but LeBron and Wade don’t seem to have a problem coordinating with him for their little free agent summit… nice to know where his priorities are.
Grandad
June 1st, 2010
6:47 pm
Najeh:
According to DraftExpress Larry Sanders has dropped
to 25. He’s a [4]/[5] not a behemoth ‘BUT’ a natural
shotblocker with terrific measurables. If he’s in the
neighborhood it would be a gift. We deserve some good
fortune. I’ll come back with w-span, etc. later.
Clyde
June 1st, 2010
7:20 pm
Star Jackson tranfers from Alabama to Georgia State. Time to get my Panther season tickets.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 1st, 2010
7:25 pm
Larry Sanders looks like a nice player, but really he reminds me of a taller Josh Smith. The Hawks have plenty of athleticism, versatility, and talent with their big men; what they lack is bulk. Sanders is a good looking player, but he won’t solve that problem.
The Hawks need a strong guy in the 260-290 pound range who won’t give up position on the block. Even if that guy is only 6′8″ or 6′9″ it’s no big deal, especially if he has a long wingspan; better to have a guy who gives up a few inches to Dwight Howard than a guy who gives up 30-40 pounds. Daniel Orton, Derrick Caracter, and Dexter Pittman fit that physical profile in the draft (not implying all of them will actually pan out), but if the Hawks think a free agent with that physical profile might get them more value, that’s fine too.
The draft should be used to accumulate the best talent regardless of position. If the best player available is a guy who fills a need, like Orton, or a guy who duplicates an existing player, like Sanders, I’m cool with picking him; even a guy who duplicates existing talent can at least be used as a trade chip later. But the big man problem is not going to be solved by a guy like Sanders.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:27 pm
“If Josh Childress comes back from Greece; how much trade value do you think he would have around the league? I think the Hawks can get a good piece for him”
that’s possible if the reports from Greece about his improved game are true. Childress would have to agree to a sign-and-trade. there’s also the change he gets an offer sheet the Hawks can’t mess with.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:30 pm
@Big Ray, Mike is back: Krstic was pretty good before the injuries. i remember he gave the Heat a little trouble in the playoffs in ‘05 and ‘06.
ILL-logical
June 1st, 2010
7:32 pm
@Daniel: My goal for the Hawks next season would be the Eastern Conference Finals. How would I get them there?
First, a sign & trade for Joe. Folks,he just ain’t that in to us,le’t get over it and hook him and the team up in a win-win( he gets the max and the Hawks avoid the tax).
Where : if Chicago, then Hinrick(sp) and Taj Gipson who I then package with Marvin to entice the Hornets to part with Chris Paul-the only superstar who would consider playing in the ATl.They need frontline players and we need a superstar to sell tickets ,one who just happens to meet the Hawk’s most pressing need .
If, New York is where Joe wants to be then I trade him for David Lee and Wilson Chandler who I then try to entice the Hornets to……
And on another tip. I would “ask” All-Star Al to get bigger and stronger and not wilt when the Dwight Howards of the world enter his territory. Come on people,if Ben Wallace could bang with the big boys at 6′ 7″, All-Star Al can do it at 6′ 9″. Then we can get a free agent big or trade for one while we wait for Dexter Pittman to become the “new” Big Baby”.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:34 pm
@ The Solution: M. Gasol is, as you say, a young and talented big man. it would take a very good package to get him.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:36 pm
@jroc: “Really MC are there any true centers in the nba.All the guys over seven feet are injury prone and are stiffs. Dwight has No post moves still a very raw talent for a true center.I think the hawks would get by with just having an acive 6′10 guy that can get a rebound or get a put back here or there and a few blocks here or there.”
there aren’t very many legit guys. if the Hawks can get a a guy with two or three legit, defined skills, with defending and rebounding at the top of the list, that would be an accomplishment.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:37 pm
@ntrigue: haven’t heard Steve Smith. don’t think i’ve ever heard him express a desire to coach?
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:45 pm
@Daniel: “MC- We always could use more front court help, and I actually like Pryzbilla (coming off injury and down year, might be cheaper) Ultimately, we NEED a playmaker at point. I like Teague, but like everyone else including the orginization, we have no idea if he is the real deal or not.”
if Pryz can give anything close to his 09-09 season he’d be a good pickup. Teague and J.J. are variables leave a lot of uncertainty.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:47 pm
@Prison Mike: “With all this talk about big men, what are they going to do with zaza. I can’t imagine zaza getting much if any playing time if haywood signs.”
Zaza would get time as backup 5 with Horford playing at 4. Zaza is a solid backup.
O'Brien
June 1st, 2010
7:51 pm
Not only is dampier an expiring contract, but it is only partially guaranteed. So they could trade his salary slot to acquire a big name free agent, and dampier’s new team can cut him/buy him out for salary relief.
So I think Haywood goes back to Dallas as the starter (instead of coming here to be a backup).
ILL-logical,
Hornets are not trading CP3. He is the face of the franchise, and very active in the community. Who they might be willing to trade is collision, if we can provide some salary relief, because they are into luxury tax territory.
However, we would probably have to take okafor off their hands to get collison, who would be our starting PG.
cp
June 1st, 2010
7:53 pm
Najeh, Darko said he would play in the NBA next year if he is guaranteed some minutes. He said he was tired of sitting on the bench not playing.
cp
June 1st, 2010
7:54 pm
The only reason I don’t see the Hornets trading Collison is because CP3 seems to always get hurt. I doubt they trade a young cheap back up when their starting pg has had the injury bug lately.
Michael Cunningham
June 1st, 2010
7:56 pm
@Najeh: “I’m pretty sure I read somewhere that Darko wants to go back to Europe.” that’s what he said for much of the season but he seemed to enjoy his time in Minnesota and said he would consider re-signing there. presumably he would also consider another team that offers him a real chance to play.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 1st, 2010
8:02 pm
From ESPN:
“SUMMIT HYPE: Despite insistence by Wade’s camp that there will be no “summit” of free-agents-to-be, Carlos Boozer is thinking of possible locations for such a meeting. “Maybe we’ll all go to the Bahamas and have a pow-wow,” he told the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Another hot rumor: The meeting-that-still-isn’t-happening could go off in Atlanta during June 26-28. ”
If free agents can come here to discuss where they want to go, they can come here to actually sign a contract. Just throwing that out there, for those people who think free agents don’t want to come to our fine city. Nah, they just want to play for teams with owners and front offices that have demonstrated their competence, and in the history of this city, only Ted Turner, Arthur Blank, John Schuerholz, and Bobby Cox have demonstrated that on a long-term basis.
JoJo the Godfather
June 1st, 2010
8:03 pm
I like Johan Petro. Probably going to take 2 yrs @ $2.5M per. Says that he wants a multi-yr deal. Sund drafted him in Seattle. He just turned 24 and has been in the league 5 years. 7 ft 250 lbs. 3.4 pts & 3.6 rebs in 12 minutes a game this year. Quick feet but has a tendency to slap at the ball. Picks up alot of fouls (2.2 in 12 minutes). Will he get better?
I also think that Dampier gets cut at some point this offseason. His contract is non-guaranteed. Will probably take a contract starting at the MLE to get him.
tyger
June 1st, 2010
8:25 pm
I’d like to see Randolph Morris production per minute…every time I saw him play he did something good. Every young player that came thru here the last 5 years that wasn’t a top pick was in the dog house, so how can you say this kid has been fairly evaluated?
He dominated the SEC. Was a top recruit coming outta high school. Only mistake he made was declaring for the draft early. If not for that, he would’ve been a to 5-10 pick w/ guaranteed playing time to develop. Instead, he has had to backdoor his way into the league.
Give him a chance with someone with a rep for utilizing his bench properly. How can we discard a kid 7′0, 270 w/ his pedigree and honestly say we need BIGS!
Gearon is right on – “Woody didnt use what he had…”
Sautee
June 1st, 2010
8:27 pm
Weren’t there some bad feelings from Pryzbilla toward the Hawks?
Anyone remember?
Sautee
June 1st, 2010
8:31 pm
cdog,
Don’t rewrite history.
Woodson was quoted last year at this time saying something like:
“I’d like us to re-sign our core free agents (Bibby, Zaza, and Marvin) and then tweak the bench”.
That’s EXACTLY what Sund did. No Woody lover should have a complaint about Sund’s last offseason moves.
Woody sure didn’t.
Ken Strickland
June 1st, 2010
8:31 pm
I also like Przybilla more than Heywood, because he gives you everything Heywood gives you and is bigger and stronger. From a financial standpoint, which is a major consideration with the ASG, I’d look at acquiring MJ MBenga from LA. He’s 7′ and very athletic, which would be a perfect compliment to Horford, and I’d also resign RMorris. With C’s-Zaza/Mbenga, PF/C-RMorris, and a HC with enough sense and ability to utilize this depth and talent, we could match up with anyone’s front line.
Resigning JJ would make everything fall into place. I’d go all out to resign both he and Chills. We could have an outstanding roster without incurring significant payroll or roster changes.
SF-JChildress
PF-JSmith
C–AHorford
SG-JJohnson
PG-JTeague
BENCH
C—–ZPachulia
C—–DJ MBenga
PF/C–RMorris
SF—-MWilliams
SG/PG-JCrawford
Draft pick
SG/PG-MBibby
This starting lineup would give us excellent OFF, DEF, versatility, ball handling, penetrating ability, outside shooting and passing. This bench would give us size, height, versatility and depth. More importantly, it wouldn’t require breaking the bank or creating any possible chemistry issues, which could be a problem with a lot of trading.
If we couldn’t pry MBenga from the Lakers, we could still be solid if drafted that young 7′ stud from Europe. I’m also certain that last yrs 7′ feel good story will be in training camp. He could certainly provide us with addition size and height to battle the likes of DHoward and the Lakers twin towers.
I don’t know if we’ll be better than we were last yr without JJ, but I don’t think we’ll be any worse. With Bibby being relegated to the bench where he belongs, along with his inconsistency and porous DEF, and with a HC that has a clue, as well as giving a damn about OFF, we could match last yrs overall production. Not resigning JJ would certainly make resigning JCrawford a top priority.
Sund will have his job cut out for him over the next 2yrs. He has to try and resign JJ this yr, then try to resign Horford and Crawford next yr. The 1st step towards elevating us to elite status has already been made. The next step will be making the right choice in selecting the best HC for our team, then he can concentrate on resigning JJ. If Sund can successfully pull of the last 2, we’ll be on our way.
Dukester9
June 1st, 2010
8:41 pm
I say we package Joe and Marvin and send them to the 76ers for Iguodala and Sam Dalembert. We get a good frontline scorer in Iggy and a tough center in Dalembert. I think most Hawks fans feel either Joe is walking or either we dont want him anyway. But we still have a team to support so we might as well get something for him. I like it because we match Joe’s ability at the 2 spot and we get out from under Marvins contract.
PG Teague/Bibby
SG Iguodala/Crawford
SF Josh Smith/Iguodala/Mo Evans if he doesnt opt out
PF Howard/Josh Smith/Benchplayer
C Dalembert/Horford/Puchalia
fill the bench out but just make sure we have a deadly 3 pt shooter on it.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
8:42 pm
MC…you deserve credit for pushing the story forward…..this is what I want to hear at least… cutting edge stories on where this franchise is today. Thank you.
cdog….don’t want to start a giant argument….but even the diehard Woody fans slunk away after the Orlando disaster….they finally got it…..and Sund did exactly what most people thought he would. Hawks beat the Celtics four times this season. How did the Celts beat the Magic?
Now I’m going to disagree with MYSELF on Sund. The Celts beat the Magic because among other things they have Rajon Rondo playing like a man possessed and also because they have a defense genius named Tom Thibadeau who came up with a five man human net. Sund’s most giant mistake is not calling up this tactician and at least interviewing him for the job.
Think I’m nuts…Try this….
NBA champs……2010….CELTICS
NBA champs…..2011 ???? but NEW ORLEANS will be in the final four
Sund should already have this guy wined and almost signed….so he can show Joe what kind of mojo he be dealing with next year. The other interviewees are lamo, lamo…..
As I stated before, Gearon and company have lost (what is it 250 million dollars in the last few years…can that possibly be correct?) millions upon millions. Why should it be hard to pay a quality coach a few of those millions if that is necessary to stop the bleeding?
Sorry, I won’t accept the GM position for those of you who understand I make sense.
To borrow a tag line that made me laugh….”Stay thirsty my friends.”
cdog
June 1st, 2010
8:44 pm
cp, no i’m not related to mike woodson.i just believe in during the right thing.in the end rick sund is going to be the one who suffers not woodson.you see, i never said woodson was a great coach.he proved he was a good coach by helping build the team into a playoff contender.in time he will get another job MAYBE THIS YEAR.at least he got to the playoffs.there’s coaches out there at golden state, la clippers,DETROIT PISTONS, sacremento kings, washington wizards just to name a few who would have love to have made the playoffs.woodson didn’t fail to defend dwight howard, miss layups or shots.he was not on the floor playing.the players on the floor did that.the coach can only put them in the right spots, its up to the players to perform once that happens.rick sund should have recognized as you and many others have also, that we were missing a quality set of big men to defend the good teams such as the majic, and celtics who we did beat but in a playoff series, the celtics would have beaten thge hawks without a quality big man.sund just plainly didn’t go out and give woodson what he needed to beat the good teams in a playoff series.like him or not sund is terrible.until the hawks get a quality GM, I DON’T CARE WHO THE COACH IS, THEY WILL LOSE IN THE PLAYOFFS.
cdog
June 1st, 2010
8:50 pm
SAM’I, SUND WILL NOT BRING IN A KELVIN GARNETT OR A KENDRICK PERKINS.THE CELTIC ASSISTANT COACH IS NOT THE ANSWER WITH THE HAWKS.DOC RIVERS WON’T BE COMING TO ATLANTA SO E ASSISTANT WILL NOT WORK COACHING THE HAWKS WITHOUT THESE INDIVIDUALS.AVERY JOHNSON IS THE LOGICAL PROVEN CHOICE TO COACH THE HAWKS NOT THE CELTIC ASSISTANT .RIVERS, GARNETT, PIERCE MADE THE CELTICS GO NOT THEIR ASSISTANT.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
8:53 pm
MC…”zaza is a solid backup”
I like zaza…..I think it’s cool that he has the guts to go in and battle. I like his behind his back passes.
I don’t like his slowness, his inability to adapt on the court, and his prowess in grabbing an offensive rebound and somehow losing his grip on the ball before he can raise it over his head into the basket.
This disqualifies him from being a quality backup in my book.
You may find quality backups on the Phoenix suns….players who can actually dominate their opponents when they are on the floor. A quality backup is not the best you can do…..it is someone who adds to the potential of the team.
Why do I care? ZaZa is going to have to go somewhere else and be replaced if the Hawks are serious about advancing. He is a likable liability.
UGA
June 1st, 2010
8:56 pm
How bout looking into a trade for Ronny Turiaf? Energy guy, only has 2 years left at 4 million per year.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
8:59 pm
cdog….I’ll think about what you said……watch New Orleans and think about what I said. I would go with Avery except I can’t get that loss to Golden State out of my mind…….Shouldn’t a competent coach have been able to do something to have won that series? Watch Boston…..when they are working the right way, their players just seem to collapse at the right time just enough bothering the shooter to make him miss…..the spacing…the results…..I have been thinking this was Thibadeau’s contribution….At least you’ll have a chance to judge for yourself….they’re still playing.
cdog
June 1st, 2010
9:00 pm
SAUTEE,YOU ARE RIGHT BUT THAT STILL DON’T JUSTIFY RICK SUND NOT ADDING A QUALITY BIG MAN. HE KNEW IN ORDER TO GET PAST THE EAST TEAMS WE NEEDED A QUALITY CENTER,AT LEAST I HOPE HE KNEW. EVERYONE ELSE DID EVERY TEAM IN THE EAST THAT MADE THE FINAL FOUR HAD QUALITY BIG PEOPLE EXCEPT THE HAWKS.BECAUSE OF WHO?, RICK SUND.I REST MY CASE..I BET A GOOD GM EVEN AN AVERAGE ONE WOULD HAVE DONE THIS.LOOK AT THE GOOD TEAMS, LAKERS,SUNS,MAJIC, CELTICS, MAVERICKS AND NUGGETS.WHEN THEY NEED A PLAYER, THEY GO OUT AND GET THEM, NO MATTER WHAT.SUND IS MORE CONCERN WITH MONEY THAN CHAMPIONSHIPS
Rufus1
June 1st, 2010
9:02 pm
Rod
I would agree with you that Turk is a better for this Atlanta team, but not at 3.5mil per year more.
I would like to pose this question to you…would Marvin only average 11pts in the Toronto run and gun offense, NO…He would average atleast 15pts and 7rbs per game..
No, They are not better players, you may think that, but they are not. A chicago radio talk host decribed Hinrich and Deng as ” average at best”.
Deng..can’t shoot the 3, average defender, average rebounder and always hurt. 12mil
Hinrich..inconsistant shooter and can’t defend the SG. 9mil
The talk host decribed anyone who thinks Deng or Hinrich are players as ” Out of Town Stupid”……Watch a couple of game or some highlights and think they are better, than they are.
If they are better than Marvin……How Much are they WORTH?
cdog
June 1st, 2010
9:03 pm
SAM’I GIVE THE MAN A CHANCE, MAYBE WITH THE HAWKS THAT WON’T HAPPEN.AVERY JOHNSON IS A GOOD COACH WHO IS A PROVEN WINNER
Grandad
June 1st, 2010
9:11 pm
Najeh + Everyone !
Larry Sanders [6-9.25] bare ft. [6-10.5] shoes [222]wgt
[7-5.75] w-span [9.75] hand length [11] hand width,
will be listed 6-11, *supposedly wide frame and shoulders,
therefore can easily add 20+ more lbs.(per NBA draft.net)
*measurements – DraftExpress.
Najeh I agree that we need a ‘Big’ that can ‘Bang’.
Especially (Orlando).
However, Sanders measures out almost the same as ‘Cousins’.
[except] the girth.
He’s *longer than Josh / although not nearly as **athletic.
*barefeet Josh 6-7+ (to) Sanders 6-9+
**athleticism – who is? [Josh]
I doubt Pittman will be around @ our # 2 pick.
If so = no brainer.
I readily agree that we should take the very best
“basketball player” @ 24. I’ve said before,
that G.Vasquez might be that man.
I would be disappointed if we took a defeatist
attitude and sold the pick or traded out of the
1st round or drafted a Euro & stashed him for
8 or 9 years.
Do something positive !
They wonder why fans don’t show?
No news
no trade spec
no info coach search
no good players available to be drafted
nothing coming out of Hawks offices [but silence]
Yet
Go to “Hoops Hype”
every NBA city
something going on
trade spec
FA spec
draft spec
Continuously generating interest.
I’m off my soap box…later.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:20 pm
We beat Boston 4-0. We beat (a sometimes injured) Garnett, Perkins, Rondo, Ray Allen, Pierce…..
Al, Joe, Crawford, Josh are just as good as the Celtics. With a competent center and competent coach, I like our chances…..
Can Sund keep the core, add a real big man, and find a competent coach? That’s my question.
What I don’t understand is how the Hawks beat the Celts 4-0, the Celts beat the Magic 4-2 (even with Howard throwing elbows at everyone in sight), the Magic beat the Hawks 4-0? And where’s Cleveland? (right Ohio)
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:22 pm
Cdog wins…..I’ll accept Avery.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:22 pm
Cdog wins…..I’ll accept Avery.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:22 pm
Cdog wins…..I’ll accept Avery.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:22 pm
Cdog wins…..I’ll accept Avery.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:22 pm
Cdog wins…..I’ll accept Avery.
sam'l
June 1st, 2010
9:22 pm
Cdog wins…..I’ll accept Avery.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
9:23 pm
1) Mike Woodson DID ask that Bibby, Marvin, and Zaza be re-signed. It was a public quote…
2) Of all the guys being mentioned as interviewing for jobs, have you heard Mike Woodson’s name even ONCE since Doug Collins got the Sixers job and dispelled all those Larry Brown homecoming rumors?
3) Eric Dampier is aging and was never motivated, no matter who coached him or how much money he was paid. I’m sick of getting big guys well after their prime. To get one who was never all that impressive DURING his prime is plain stupid. In the meantime, stop getting them two or three years too late. Time to stop dragging the net at the bottom of the pool, and start making a splash in free agency.
4) Marvin is definitely NOT better than Turkoglu, Deng, or Hinrich. But let’s take this step by step: Comparing Hinrich to Marvin is silly. One is a big SF, the other splits time between PG and SG. But if a comparison can be made, then do it by the scoring numbers. Hinrich wins, both regular season and postseason.
Turkoglu is clearly on the downside and functions much better as a point forward than he does as a traditional SF. Even so, his stats still beat Marvin’s.
Deng makes more money than he’s worth, and right now it’s embarrassingly more. But guess what? Marvin has NEVER been AS GOOD as Deng. Ever. Not in college, not in the pros. More hyped? Yes. Better? Never.
Which brings me to….
5) Another draft gaffe. Guess who got picked after Josh Childress? Luol Deng and Andre Iguodala. You think if Billy “Afro Genius” Knight had picked either of those guys (especially Iguodala), that we would be yapping about “oh, if we can just bring Childress back to America” all summer? Nope, and we wouldn’t be half as worried about losing JJ, either. Instead, we sit here watching re-runs of Marvin’s flops and spills.
Summer makes me cynical, bitter, and impatient. And I don’t care who says I’m beating a dead horse. I’m sick of staring at the carcass that won’t go away.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
9:24 pm
OH wait, I forgot. If we picked anybody better than we did before Al Horford came along, then we wouldn’t have Al Horford. And as we all know, he’s the Messiah all by himself.
Man, I gotta quick drinking and posting…
O'Brien
June 1st, 2010
9:26 pm
@ Rufus1,
What does playing in a run and gun offense have to do with Marvin’s inability to make open shots? What does playing in a run and gun offense have to do with Marvin getting his shot blocked by smaller players? What does playing in a run and gun offense have to do with Marvin stumbling and fumbling? Sure, he might average more points, but he will not be very efficient.
@ MC,
ZaZa is a solid backup. I just think he doesn’t mesh well with our team based on our shortcomings. Al and Josh are 6′9″, 6′10″, 245. We need a 7 footer who can be physical. ZaZa’s best defensive move is to foul.
Even if Pryzbilla had an issue with the Hawks, we now have a different GM and a different coach, so I dont think he would have an issue coming here. Portland might let him go, because with Oden’s injury history, they might want to look for a healthier option at center. Would they want ZaZa in a trade?
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
9:29 pm
Okay, so Sund is so bad that no matter who coaches, we will be terrible until Sund gets the magical big man who can defeat all opposing centers.
Aiiiight….then why do we need Avery Johnson? Why give him a chance? Isn’t he gonna fail because Sund just sucks as a GM? Why bother? Nevermind, that might require more than a single coherent thought, which would be just too much for some minds.
In the meantime, what happens when you go out and pay for a veteran 4/5, and the coach refuses to use him for most of the season, and nearly not at all for the playoffs?
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2010
9:29 pm
Pryzbilla isn’t likely going to opt-out and then take a 1-year deal and Haywood won’t likely need to settle for a one-year deal..Why am I talking about one year deals? Because Horford’s raise is due in about 13 months and unless something significant changes, I don’t see the ASG paying upwards of $30M on Smith, Horford and a back-up center (don’t forget that Zaza is around $5M also)…. that would make very little sense.
So I think you may want to lower your sights to guys that are more likely to accept a short-term deal (like maybe 1-2 years at most) and less than $4M. I’m thinking about names like Tony Battie, Kwame and maybe Brad Miller. Would JON take such a deal?
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
9:31 pm
Which knucklehead said Randolph Morris did positive things every time he went out and played? How about all the jokes told by the announcers and writers, betting each other that he would foul out if he played more than 10-15 minutes (which he did)?
RandMo has some offensive skills, and he can grab a rebound or two. But on defense, he’s a walking flagrant.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
9:32 pm
Pryzbilla is never coming here. He said so when the Hawks jettisoned him years ago.
Tony Battie would be fine….as our new big man coach. We gotta quit getting guys AFTER they have ceased their ability to play the game effectively.
Big Ray
June 1st, 2010
9:35 pm
Jermaine “The Battle of Two Wounded Knees” O’Neal?
Nah. Why come here when he can sit on the bench with two platinum studded crutches while Wade and Boozer tear up the Southeast division.
The Heat will be even better when Beasley graduates from the Lindsay Lohan “I’m rich and extremely stupid” Clinic of Who Knows WTF is Wrong With My Ass program.
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2010
9:35 pm
My $30M estimate above EXCLUDES Zaza… I’m guessing Horford gets no less than $15M/year unless there is a significant change in the next CBA. An All-Star center who is only getting better won’t likely accept a deal that is comparable to the one signed by Josh. (Again, unless there is a shocking change in the market or CBA).
O'Brien
June 1st, 2010
9:46 pm
AJ,
I think Horford will end up closer to $12 mil than to $15 mil. And for the sake of the Hawks, I hope I’m right.
Ray,
I think RandMo can be our third PF (behind Josh and the backup PF). I think we need to trade ZaZa, and find a way (trade or free agency) to get a legit 7 footer who can play defense in here, and for the third center slot, we can go with DJ Mbenga, or Johan Petro (one of those guys who are cheap, but are still young, and might improve).
And we can also take Dexter Pittman in the second round…
Astro Joe
June 1st, 2010
9:56 pm
@MC, the last free agent to get more then $3M from the Hawks was Speedy Claxton in 2006. But of Al is truly “demanding” a center (and may ultimately decide to include that in his decision-making next summer), then ,maybe they will step up to the plate and spend some cash. But I have my doubts.
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
10:00 pm
Randmo can’t be anything for the Atlanta Hawks, if the Hawks are serious about competing. People talk about Sheldon, but I would take Sheldon over Randmo any day. Any one on the third string has to be one of the most energetic guys you have on the team. Many times Morris didn’t even seem like he was interested in the game while he was playing.
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
10:01 pm
If I was the Hawks I would try to make a run for Haywood AND Ratliff (Ratliff for a little over the minimum).
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
10:02 pm
Hey guys, who would be harder to understand during a time out, a pissed off Avery Johnson, or Mutombo?
ryan
June 1st, 2010
10:05 pm
I wonder if we can package a deal that could send Josh Smith and Josh Childress for Amare Stoudamire.
Rufus1
June 1st, 2010
10:12 pm
O’brian…The offense style matter(Channing Frye) and so does the quality of the team(Nate Robinson).
Turk..42% FG,12pts , 2.9ast…Career numbers
Hinrich..41% FG, 14pts, 5.8ast …career number
Williams..45% FG, 12pts, 5.4ast..career numbers
JoJo the Godfather
June 1st, 2010
10:33 pm
Just send Josh Smith to Orlando for Marcin Gortat & Brandon Bass. Gortat wants to start and Bass wants more playing time as well. Atlanta has their true center for 4 more years and a legit backup PF for 3 more years. If its not even, draft picks can be involved.
Steve
June 1st, 2010
10:56 pm
Quality big last year not Sund’s fault – ASG with no money. I think Sund got the best 2 he would for the vet min. Since we are close to being a very, very good team, maybe ASG will be willing to spend a little more – Nate Robinson at PG, Childress, and let Mo’ go, and sign Darko or Haywood – and go ahead and sign Avery Johnson – let’s see what happens.
Steve
June 1st, 2010
10:58 pm
And I would sign Channing Frye in a heartbeat – I know he’s not big and physical for and NBA Center, but the guy can play.
northcyde
June 1st, 2010
11:05 pm
Cdog . . they don’t wanna hear all of that. Everything that happened in the playoffs is all Woody’s fault. And some of them are already dropping hints as to what to blame Woody for, for next year’s possible slippage. Notice that it is mainly THEY who keep bringing up the name of Woody, not his so-called supporters.
LOL . . back in October, some of these same fans were calling Sund a potential GM of the year . . for his acquisition of Crawford . . his drafting of Teague . . his re-signing of Zaza, Marvin, and Bibby to “reasonable contracts” . . and by addressing the Hawks “big man” issues by bringing in Joe Smith and Jason Collins.
As the season ended, and we were at 53 wins . . the players did that. But when we had a nuclear meltdown in the playoffs . . it was mainly Woody’s fault.
In my next post, I’ll illustrate what Sund could’ve done with the Hawks. No way does that dude get a pass for what happened last year, or the position we’re in this summer.
northcyde
June 1st, 2010
11:10 pm
Cdog . . to illustrate your point, I’ll remind these people of the guys we could’ve acquired last year
* Let’s start with Mr. Crawford. A great pickup by Sund. But we didn’t HAVE to trade for that dude. Crawford improved us definitely, but we weren’t winning a title with that squad last year, unless he and JJ played like superstars. And remember, Acie and Speedy would’ve been expiring contracts going into this summer. So let’s say we DON’T do the Crawford deal.
* This is for you Najeh . . . instead of Teague, the guy we could’ve had was DEJUAN BLAIR . . the exact type of bulky rebounder you’re talking about. Blair was a top 10 – 15 pick who freefalled through the draft because all of these NBA GMs are idiots . . with the exception of San Antonio . . who had sense enough to take dude in the 2nd round.
* So what do we do for a PG? How about going out to get Andre Miller . . the penetrating, pass-first, decent defending PG that we so desperately need here. How about renouncing the rights to Chill and Bibby ( whose cap hold last summer was JJ-like ), and make a run at Dre? You think he would’ve loved to run the point in ATL, with JJ as a shooter, and Smoove as a finisher to pass the ball to?
* How about Marvin? Remember . . he was a RESTRICTED FREE AGENT last summer. We didn’t have to offer him a deal ( even though most Hawk fans agreed that the 5yr deal for 38 mill was a “fair deal” for Marvin ). We could’ve let him play for the Qualifying Offer of 7 mill . . or waited until someone gave him an offer sheet.
* Zaza was the one guy we probably HAD to hold onto, but he was an unrestricted free agent, and we could’ve sent him walking too. But say we keep Zaza for the same price.
* So now we have the MLE to maybe add additional people. Oh . . I don’t know. Maybe bring in Jerry Stackhouse? Bring back Flip Murray? Juan Dixon ( who should’ve made the squad )? Maybe a box office draw like Allen Iverson ( who was desperate to play for SOMEBODY )?
Decide on 2 players to split the MLE on.
Sund had all kinds of options last summer. So for whatever moves he made or didn’t make, that’s on HIM.
Samuel
June 1st, 2010
11:14 pm
I smell Lotto for 2011.
northcyde
June 1st, 2010
11:19 pm
So let’s set the team for 2009 – 10
G – Miller ( 4yrs – 28 to 30 million )
G – JJ ( expiring contract – 15 million )
F – Marvin ( expiring contract – 7 million )
F – Smoove
F/C – Horford
Bench
G – Law ( expiring contract – if we don’t pick up team option – 2 million )
G – Stackhouse or Iverson or Flip ( 1yr – 2 to 2.5 million )
F – Evans ( ability to opt out in 2010 – 2.5 mill off the books if he does )
F – Dejuan Blair
C – Zaza
G – Speedy ( expiring contract – 5 million )
C – Morris ( expiring contract – 900K )
****************
I’ll say that this squad right here could’ve at least obtained the 4th spot in the East, and possibly won 47 – 51 games. We’d still lose in the 2nd round, due to the lack of a quality big man. But we’d be in MUCH BETTER POSITION for the 2010 free agency period, depending on what we wanted to do with the expiring contracts.
But the Crawford signing, combined with holding on to Chill, is really the thing that’s keeping us from making a major play for one of these free agents, should JJ sign elsewhere.
cdog
June 1st, 2010
11:27 pm
BIG RAY,BELIEVE ME, RICK SUND IS SUPER TERRIBLE.HE’S BEYOND BAD.
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
11:35 pm
Isn’t it funny how Los Angeles Lakers are in the NBA Finals. And they have one of the highest payrolls in the league. Yet, they’ve emerged as the favorites to sign Chris Bosh. I think the Hawks should be aggressive in going after one of the big free agents and seeing about a sign and trade deal. Crawford’s expiring deal would be perfect in making the deal happen. Also why isn’t JJ lobbying to try and get another big ticket free agent to come and visit the Hawks? As it’s been said many times, if you take the big tickets off of their current roster, the remaining players on each team all come second to the Hawks without JJ. So out of the possible destinations, the Hawks are the closest to title contention. And they’re actually the only team that made it to the 2nd round.
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
11:39 pm
Why aren’t the Hawks considering renouncing the rights to Chills, if his contract (or lack of) is preventing them from being able to make certain acquisitions that can help the team a lot. Wouldn’t a fool allow a NON ALL STAR caliber player to tie up so much money of the available salary cap for THREE YEARS, and not have anything to show for it?
Grandad
June 1st, 2010
11:41 pm
nc – with all due respect, your scenario was disjointed & diffuse.
Everyone’s all over the place tonite. Channing Frye says he wants
to stay in PHX.
Some fella last eve on pod-cast, suggested we “would” pkg.
Marv & Jamal sooner or *later *[trade deadline] for a *franchise
type player to pair with Joe. He would not elaborate as to
the caliber *[franchise] only saying ‘not’ Carmelo (caliber).
I gathered someone in the *O.J. Mayo category.
*Just a player of that caliber, not necessarily him. [Mayo]
A young up & coming, yet promising future all-star.
cdog
June 1st, 2010
11:46 pm
NORTHCLYDE, THIS THE NBA NOT COLLEGE OR HIGH SCHOOL.AS I RECALLED WOODSON WAS NOT ON THE COURT AS A PLAYER DURING THE PLAYOFFS.IN THE NBA THE PLAYERS USUALLY DECIDES AN OUTCOME OF A GAME NOT THE COACH.YOU THINK AN NBA PLAYER LISTENS TO COACHING STRATEGIES ALL OF THE TIME? NO.IN COLLEGE AND HIGH SCHOOL YES BUT NOT ON THE PRO LEVEL.YOUR WINS AND LOSSES ARE DETERMINED BY WHAT QUALITY OF PLAYERS YOU HAVE ON THE FLOOR.PUT YOUR SO CALLED GREAT COACH PHIL JACKSON WITH THE CURRENT HAWKS ROSTER AND SEE HOW MANY TIMES THEY PLAY FOR A CHAMPIONSHIP. NONE. SO SAYING ALL OF THIS, RICK SUND SHOULD BE FAULTED FOR NOT PROVIDING THE PROPER TALENT NEEDED TO GET BY ORLANDO OR EVEN CLEVELAND WHO WOULD HAVE BEATEN THE HAWKS IN A PLAYOFF SERIES ALSO.
Grandad
June 1st, 2010
11:49 pm
cdog:
“BELIEVE ME, RICK SUND IS SUPER TERRIBLE.HE’S BEYOND BAD.”
cdog – I must disagree.
He’s done nothing, [here], to draw that malevolence.
Ramon
June 1st, 2010
11:51 pm
Grandad, Sund has made some questionable and bad decisions though.
northcyde
June 1st, 2010
11:57 pm
I mean damn . . we’re holding onto Josh Childress like he’s a collection of 17th century gold coins found on a pirate ship. If that dude doesn’t want to come back to us this year, and if Sund or the ASG don’t want to extend a multi-year contract to Chill . . THEN RENOUNCE THAT DUDE . . GET HIM OFF THE BOOKS.
No sense keeping “dead money” like that around for more than one season. Cut your losses and move on.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
12:02 am
“This is for you Najeh . . . instead of Teague, the guy we could’ve had was DEJUAN BLAIR . . the exact type of bulky rebounder you’re talking about. Blair was a top 10 – 15 pick who freefalled through the draft because all of these NBA GMs are idiots . . with the exception of San Antonio . . who had sense enough to take dude in the 2nd round.”
I completely agree — in fact, at about this time a year ago I was dropping Blair’s name all over the place (and getting criticized for it by many people, such as niremetal).
Not saying Teague was a bad pick — I still think he is a good player and will get much better — but Blair would have been a godsend for the Hawks.
Then again, who knows if Woody would have actually played him…
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
12:11 am
Najeh, I’m struggling to see how Blair would’ve been better than Sheldon Williams. Now because he was drafted by the Spurs and came out ok, it seems like the Hawks could’ve taken him, but I don’t see it.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
12:18 am
Using woulda coulda shoulda logic we [wcs] drafted:
* Collison – pt. g.
* Roddy Beaubois – pt. g.
* Ellison – shooter
* Jerebko – drafted after Blair / better season.
* Marcus Thornton – drafted after Blair / shooter.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
12:22 am
“even though most Hawk fans agreed that the 5yr deal for 38 mill was a “fair deal” for Marvin ”
Based on last year’s production and the reasonable assumption that a 23-year-old would improve, it was a fair deal. What makes it such an atrocious looking deal right now is that Marvin got significantly worse this year. If he put up 15 and 6 on 46% shooting with good defense and 36% 3-point-shooting this year — a reasonable expectation based on his production from the last two seasons — his contract would be acceptable and movable.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
12:25 am
“Najeh, I’m struggling to see how Blair would’ve been better than Sheldon Williams. Now because he was drafted by the Spurs and came out ok, it seems like the Hawks could’ve taken him, but I don’t see it.”
If you’re implying that Woody wouldn’t have played him, I can see how you came to that conclusion. If you’re implying that he would suck outside of the Spurs’ system, I completely disagree. I think a bruising rebounder like that can be good in any system.
northcyde
June 2nd, 2010
12:28 am
@ grandad . . . you are more than welcome to disprove anything I said in that scenario. Everything I said was very possible:
* we didn’t have to trade for Crawford, and kept the expiring contracts of Law and Speedy
* we could’ve drafted Dejuan Blair, to address our rebounding issues
* we could’ve renounced Chill, to get his 10 mill cap hold off the books
* we could’ve renounced Bibby to get his 15+ million cap hold off the books.
* we then could’ve been enough under the cap to make a serious play for Andre Miller to FINALLY address the PG position.
* we then could’ve brought back Zaza
* and with our MLE money, we could’ve signed 1, maybe 2 low priced free agents ( other than those scrubs Joe Smith and Jason Collins ). Blair would’ve made both of those guys obsolete.
* and when the summer of 2010 came around, we’d be in better position to compensate for the loss of JJ, by adding starter quality free agents.
That is as clear and concise as I can make this. If you want to dispute any of this, go right ahead.
If Woody was calling the shots behind the scenes personnel wise, and Sund was just going with the flow, the ASG should’ve just named Wooody as GM and never hired Sund.
We’ll see if this dude can make his money this year, without just going along with “Woody’s Plan”.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
12:29 am
“Isn’t it funny how Los Angeles Lakers are in the NBA Finals. And they have one of the highest payrolls in the league. Yet, they’ve emerged as the favorites to sign Chris Bosh.”
The only way they get Bosh is if they trade Gasol or Bynum for him, or if Toronto accepts Odom and Artest together in exchange for him. Trading Bynum for him would make no sense for either team, because the Lakers struggle with toughness inside as it is, and shifting Gasol to center full time would make them even worse in that regard. Trading Gasol for him doesn’t make sense either, because Gasol knows the triangle and is probably the better player anyway. Trading Odom and Artest for him makes no sense because then you have two PFs, a C, and no small forward, not to mention you lose a lot of toughness by making that deal too.
Long story short, I don’t know where it said the Lakers are favorites to get Bosh, but there’s no deal I can think of that would make any sense for them, let alone the Raptors.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
12:31 am
The more I think about it, after my 11:41 post, when I used
OJ Mayo as an example, the more I liked the idea. People on
this board have brought up his name [Mayo] before and I haven’t
thought much about it, but now, he may be just the ticket.
With Joe, a running mate / wingman. They could play together
in the same backcourt [when Teaguer rests].
If Joe leaves, he gives Josh & Al an outside scoring threat
for balance.
I wonder if Memphis would turn him loose & do we have the
chips (Marv, Jamal, Childress, Bibby, Zaza, pkg.) that would
entice Memphis?
smh
June 2nd, 2010
12:39 am
Its nice to see that northcyde failed to mention that with 3 of those guys his man crush Woodrow dam near pleaded to have them brought back. How many times did we hear Woodrow talk about how he wanted Bibby and Marvin back? Wow what a concept a gm signing the guys the coach asked for. Its always funny to watch northcyde and Samuel blame everyone and give Woodrow a free pass. Samuel everyone already knows how much of a clown you are. You never had anything to say when the Hawks were losing. I bet you didn’t touch your keyboard during the Bucks series. Hell you probably unplugged your comp during the Magic series.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
12:46 am
nc – I didn’t say any of it was untrue, therefore,
no need to justify. I said it was diffuse. Too many
parts to untangle all @ once. If you’re looking @
Mr. Sund’s record and or accomplishments over the
short time he has been here and you are correcting
all his percieved mistakes then all that you said
is true to the extent that everything
he did and has accomplished were true as well.
History has not proven that he has not made
a mistake at this point so your counterpoint is
therefore also neither right or wrong.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
12:48 am
*Typo*
“History has not proven that he has or has not made a mistake”
Hawksfanman
June 2nd, 2010
12:50 am
We should sign frye but we need to rebuild, point blank we cant win a championship with who we have period…… we need to trade joe and jamal for potential and picks.
Clyde
June 2nd, 2010
1:00 am
Sean Williams
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
1:05 am
“G – Miller ( 4yrs – 28 to 30 million )
G – JJ ( expiring contract – 15 million )
F – Marvin ( expiring contract – 7 million )
F – Smoove
F/C – Horford
Bench
G – Law ( expiring contract – if we don’t pick up team option – 2 million )
G – Stackhouse or Iverson or Flip ( 1yr – 2 to 2.5 million )
F – Evans ( ability to opt out in 2010 – 2.5 mill off the books if he does )
F – Dejuan Blair
C – Zaza
G – Speedy ( expiring contract – 5 million )
C – Morris ( expiring contract – 900K )”
Here’s the problem with your scenario — and I know you’ll disagree — with Woody as the head coach, there’s no way this team tops 50 wins. Dre Miller can’t shoot 3’s, and with the iso-Joe offense, a point guard who can shoot 3’s is more important than a point guard who can, you know, do point guard things like driving inside and setting up teammates. (Let’s ignore for now that Bibby can’t really shoot consistently anymore either.) The Hawks had a hard enough time spacing the floor with Bibby and Crawford on the team; with neither one around, iso-Joe would fail even more often as Joe wouldn’t have room to drive or shooters to pass the ball to.
We already know Woody wasn’t going to play Acie, and we already know Zaza was mostly ineffective this year. We know Randolph Morris wouldn’t get playing time (and even if he did, there’s no guarantee he’d be effective), and we know Speedy is unreliable. Between Stackhouse, Iverson, and Flip, it’s most likely they would have kept Flip since he was on the team the previous year, and of course Mo Evans would have been there. Knowing Woody’s mixed track record with rookies, who knows whether he would have played Blair enough for him to make an impact — my guess is Blair would have been the 2nd big man off the bench behind Zaza, meaning his minutes and impact would have been limited.
So really, you’re looking at basically the same team that got swept by the Cavs last year, except with Miller replacing Bibby. Starting lineup would have been Miller, Joe, Marvin, Smoove, and Al, while Flip, Mo, and Zaza would get the lion’s share of any bench minutes with Blair likely receiving spot duty and the rest of them riding the pine. That’s a slight upgrade at point guard in terms of talent (not necessarily in terms of fit) and a significant downgrade on the bench. My guess is that team finishes with the same 46-47 wins they had the previous year, possibly falling behind Milwaukee to the 5th seed and losing in the first round.
Now it is definitely true that the Hawks would have more cap flexibility this offseason — about $7 million more. This would probably give them enough space to sign a max player, especially if they renounced Childress (assuming one wanted to sign here). But I don’t think there’s any way they make it to 50 wins or the 2nd round with that team.
northcyde
June 2nd, 2010
1:13 am
Also Grandad . . . I’m talking about what Sund could’ve feesibly done. Call it what you want, but it illustrates a lack of vision by him. He could’ve set this team up to do well last season, plus set us up for the summer of 2010 free agency.
Like Najeh said, Dejuan was a guy this team could’ve desperately used as a rebounder off the bench. And the mock drafts were split on who we were going to take . . from Eric Maynor to Teague to Lawson to Tyler Hansbrough ( who was the early favorite for us to take ).
So when you see a top 10 player like Dejuan freefalling right into Sund’s lap, and he doesn’t adjust his thinking and take him instead of Teague, then you have to question Sund’s decision making.
For Horford ans Smoove to possibly get to that next level as players, they’re going to need a PG who can get the ball to them in the right spots for them to score a little more easy.
We’re hoping Teague could develop into that type of PG.
We KNOW that Miller is that type of PG.
So to not make a move to get him, even if you have to renounce part of your core to get him, is an oversight a good GM can’t make.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
1:30 am
“No way does that dude get a pass for what happened last year, or the position we’re in this summer.”
I’ll co-sign this, but more than what he did last offseason, it’s what he does this offseason that will define his success or failure as the Hawks’ GM. If he keeps Joe and is able to add the big man and depth the Hawks need to reach the next level, or if he lets Joe walk and is able to pull off a trade (like the Crawford + bad contracts for Collison + bad contracts trade I keep bringing up) that addresses some of the Hawks’ weaknesses, his shortcomings last offseason will mostly be redeemed. If he can’t do this, we will be calling for his head.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
1:34 am
Wow, I just looked at Chicago’s salary outlay. That is quite a hideous contract Luol Deng has — maybe as bad as Okafor’s contract, and certainly worse than anything on the Hawks’ payroll right now.
northcyde
June 2nd, 2010
1:38 am
Najeh . . I agree somewhat about the squad overall. But Miller would’ve easily averaged at least 14 pts and 7 assists as PG for us.
The fallacy constantly stated on this board, is tha our offense consisted of nothing but ISO-JJ. You mak can say that for the bulk of the 4th quarter, but not the bulk of the game. Just because JJ served as the “bail out guy” when the shot clock runs down, doesn’t mean that he held the ball for 20 seconds, then decided to shoot. A lot of times, he got the ball back with 10 seconds, and was expected to make a play with the clock running down ( ala Brandon Roy in Portland ).
But back to Miller.
Woody has never had a capable PG who could break people down like a Miller, plus set people up. Woody has always been flexible with his vet PGs, and letting them do what they can do.
He had no problem letting Anthony Johnson run the show for a while. I never saw that alley-oop from the 3 point line that we run for Smoove via JJ, until AJ started doing it for Marvin on occasion.
The same went fo Bibby. When Bibby was healthy, he let Bibby run the team.
So there’s no doubt in my mind that Woody would let a proven PG like Miller do his thing as well. ISO-JJ wouldn’t disappear, but Miller would have us run more pick and rolls with our big men. That’s one of his strengths as a player, and Woody wouldn’t relegate him to playing off the ball.
JJ pretty much had to have the ball a lot, because he was the guy good enough to get his own shot as well as set people up. Woody would have no problem letting a vet like Dre run the show, because of his ability to get to the rim.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
2:17 am
Not necessarily recommending taking this guy, but Tiny Gallon is a great name.
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
2:45 am
SIGN AVERY AS THE COACH.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
2:46 am
KEEP IT SIMPLE BRING JOE BACK AND CHILL.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
2:48 am
SIGN FREE AGENT AL HARRINGTON.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
2:53 am
TRADE MARVIN AND ZAZA FOR MONTA ELLIS.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
2:53 am
ever since sekou left, it’s just not the same around here:
1: randolph morris is not an NBA player, please don’t resign him – he quit on the game during high school; some one on here said he “dominated” the SEC and left school too early; his best season was his jr. year (06-07) where he averaged 16 and 8; a meager college career at best for a 3rd year player
2: a true starting point guard should be here regardless of if we resign JJ, but it shouldn’t be ANDRE MILLER OR KIRK HINRICH; both guys are unathletic and aren’t “true” point guards in the sense of the word; hinrich shoots 41.9% for his CAREER and only averages 4 assists for his CAREER (i repeat); miller can’t shoot 3’s (CAREER average 20.9% – pathetic) and is not as willing of a passer in his older years because he’s extremely lazy at this point in his career (less than 7 assists per game over the last 3 seasons as a starter and only a 7.2 CAREER average)
3: JEFF TEAGUE is the best solution we have at a true point guard (see his final game of the regular season against CLE minus LBJ) unless we can trade for darren collison/chris paul (highly unlikely) or some how ERIC BLEDSOE falls to us in the upcoming draft (he’s projected anywhere from 15th to 36th in 9 different mock drafts i’ve seen); ERIC BLEDSOE was the second highest rated guard in the country behind JOHN WALL, and played the 2 because he had to – unbelievable talent that we cannot pass up if he’s there; i believe MC just wrote an article about how the 24th spot won’t yield any long term fruit, but he obviously knows nothing about basketball (tony parker, manu ginobili, dejuan blair, gerald wallace, darren collison – ALL drafted 24th or lower in the last 10 yrs – and that’s just off the top of my head)
4: SIGN AND TRADE JJ for players that fill HIS role (a la JOHN SALMONS or RUDY GAY + other players, picks, or cash); OR, let JJ walk and sign a guy like RAY ALLEN to a 1 year deal at a higher price than other teams would be willing to pay him per season at his age.
5: MARK JACKSON is the most suitable replacement for taking this team to the NEXT LEVEL; we NEED to take a risk and not go the “safe route” here; we NEED a coach who is willing to work with the personnel we have and HELP them to believe in themselves as a TEAM; woody was a divider and MARK JACKSON can be a uniter if given a chance; remember, AVERY J. was at the right place at the right time in terms of being considered a “winning” coach; everyone knows he’s too overbearing for our guys – again, whether JJ resigns here or not; casey, or whomever else sund is considering do not fit the personality of our TEAM;
Believe me, we are a coach who commands respect (but is still player friendly) away from being a contender – again whether JJ signs here or not.
Now I’ll tell Mr. Sund & Gearon Jr. what they should do:
Let JJ walk and sign RAY ALLEN to an overpriced 1yr/10mil deal. He’s 80% of JJ at 33, and JJ won’t be as efficient as RAY RAY after 2 yrs on his max deal he’s about to sign. JESUS would also bring some class to our city for a moment. Go get a JOEL PRYZBILLA or a SHAQ at the midlevel to bring off the bench. Add a dead eye 3 point shooter or two (i know some one is out there who can shoot better than MO or CHILLS). Do something with CHILLS’ contract – ANYTHING! Hang BIBBY & ZAZA out on a billboard and pray some one’s dumb enough to take on their contracts for anything useful. We’d have tons of $ coming off the books after 2010-2011 season and be ready to pay BIG AL the following summer. We’d still be a top tier team, AND we’d be in a prime position to build for the future at the same time. Don’t trade SMOOVE!!! He may have motivational problems, but a new coach is going to change him. The dude played for a guy who is notorious for riding young players hard, and has improved his game each year, despite a lack of coaching or encouragement from the fans. A true point guard in the starting role will CHANGE the entire dynamic of this team. If you have horses, you NEED TO RUN THEM. We have horses!!! The reason MARVS looks like an idiot is because BIBBY AND JJ have dribbled out 90% of our shot clocks over the last 2 years. The other 10% of the time, we looked like we could beat anybody, anywhere – due to pure talent!! A respectable and likable coach, along with a few KEY personnel moves will solve the Atlanta Basketball quandry. We are sooooooo close, and yet we are a couple of idiotic moves from oblivion once again! Regardless of what actually happens, get ready for a WILD SUMMER HAWKS’ FANS….
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
2:55 am
24# SOLOMON ALABI DEFENSIVE STOPPER.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
2:59 am
2010 ATLANTA HAWKS AVERY COACHING
STARTER MONTA ELLIS, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, HORFORD,
BENCH TEAGUE, JAMAL, MOE, AL HARRIGNTON, SOLOMON ALABI
RESERVE BIBBY, MORRIS.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!
tony
June 2nd, 2010
3:06 am
I had being lobbying for us to go after Haywood before Dallas stuck their claws in him. The problem with this organization is that they never use logic in making decisions. They hired a GM who done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in his 36 years nba tenure. A BIG ZERO CHAMPIONSHIP! To have success in the busness world you have to associate yourself with successful business people.
If we’re ever going to build a championship caliber team this organization need to start hiring championship caliber people. I’ve been saying this for years. I honestly believe Mr Blank had been reading these message boards because he finally done exactly what I’ve being advocating. He hired a championship GM and coach. Dimitroff was associated with the New England Patriots and Mike Smith was associated with the Baltimore Ravens. Both came from championship organizations. Will the Falcons win a championship with these people calling the shots? I believe so.
If Mr Sund hire the wrong coach for this team, it will be a disaster for the people in this state.
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
3:23 am
worst case scenario under my plan…
lineup:
PG – Teague
SG – Ray Ray, aka Jesus Shuttlesworth
SF – Marvs
PF – Smoove
C – Big Al
bench: crawford, shaq, bibs, bledsoe (hopefully), zaza, chills’ contract’s cap room, kyle korver, mike miller, and/or roger mason on the cheap cheap, brad miller or the first Big Z on the cheap cheap
this would put is between 64-69 million cap-wise.. depending on the salary cap next year, we could be looking nice under the right conditions.
personnel & chemistry + quality coaching, management & ownership = championship
Somebody save us from another heartless playoff ending!! We work too hard during the regular season to give up when it matters.. Just look where BOSTON is now.. that could’ve been us with the right coach.. that should’ve been the HAWKALIERS with the right coach.. where’s the DOC when you need him?? oh yeah, he’s in BOSTON.. and how bout that TOM THIBIDEAU – why not be seeking permission to interview him?? he’s player friendly, defensive minded and pretty much the co-coach on the team we beat 4 times this year that about to win their second title in 3 years.. i don’t want to bet against KOBE and PHIL, but the lakers are SOFT.. if BOSTON is healthy enough, they are hangin #18
peace, love & goodnite from the heart of Hawksville.
McHawkmick, aka blonju, aka the ghost of sekou smith
tony
June 2nd, 2010
3:26 am
When I say championship gm and coach, I’m not refering to them as someone who was a former gm or former hc but as someone who was associated with a championship organization and now becomes a gm and hc. I thought I better make myself clear on that.
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
3:37 am
Tony,
championship coaches aren’t sitting around waiting on the Hawks’ to find them… in the real world, THIBIDEAU might be the closest thing possible to what your looking for but could end up being the second coming of woody… i agree that Sund’s track record does not provide a true fan with much hope for the right championship ‘tweaks’ being made… sometimes, a championship coach has to be made… or perhaps you are right?! maybe we need to go find RUDY TOMJONAVICH?!?! i’m pretty sure popovich, zenmaster, larry brown, doc rivers and pat riley are the only coaches to win titles in the last 20 years, besides TOMJONAVICH.. whoa, that’s startling just to say it out loud.. before that it was late Chuck Daly with the 89-90 pistons… anyways, you couldn’t be more right about championship management & coaches… and honestly, unless Rick Sund grows a huge pair of testicles and a brain, the Falcons and Braves have MUCH better chances of bringing ATL a title… it’s sad, but true Hawks’ fans… i’m too much of a fan to ever give up, but to quote the computer in “I ROBOT” – my logic is undeniable… and so is tony’s… ANYWAYS, i’m a die hard fan, so GO HAWKS!!!!
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
3:45 am
Tony,
your point was made clearer during my response to your post.. Mark Jackson had some noteworthy playoff appearences, but no title.. you got any ideas?? i definitely don’t think Avery Johnson suits the mentality that we need for our team.. he won 1 title as a player with the spurs, but was a journeyman for most of his career.. much more of a role player who happened to be at the right place at the right time (as a player and coach actually).. He thinks he’s much smarter than he actually is.. I am not high on him as a coach obviously.. might as well hire Robert Horry if we’re going by titles as a player – lol! (just a joke) … anyways, i’m certainly open to suggestions (other than Avery, or Casey, or Mr. Larry Drew)…
northcyde
June 2nd, 2010
4:08 am
@ blonju:
1) Agreed . . . Randolph Morris is garbage for the most part.
2) Miller doesn’t waste time shooting a lot of 3 point jumpers, because he’s trying to get to the rim . . which is exactly what we need at the PG position. A guy who can get to the rim and FINISH . . unlike young Mr. Teague. LOL @ scoffing at a 7.2 career assist average. You can maybe name 4 other guys in the league who can say they have dished out 7 assist + for their entire career ( Paul, Deron, Kidd, Nash ). Great . . let’s put the hopes of the Hawks on Teague, based off of his great performance vs the Cleveland scrubs in the final game of the season. Makes perfect sense.
3) Teague is only the best option, if he can prove he can get it done. If not, you’ll see a lot of Crawford at the 1, and Bibby backing him up, even with the new coach.
4) JJ has the power in a sign and trade, because he can choose where he wants to go. I can guarantee you that it will not be Milwaukee. And it’ll only be Memphis if he doesn’t want max money, and desperately wants to stay close to home. We just can’t sign and trade JJ to whomever WE want him to go. JJ has the final say-so in a sign and trade.
5) It’s amazing how many people want basketball commentators who have never been head coaches in their lives, to coach the Hawks. Talk about setting the bar low. Fan logic = “Smitty says that Marvin should shoot quicker . . OMG . . I think that too!! . . let’s make him our new coach”
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
4:09 am
“TRADE MARVIN AND ZAZA FOR MONTA ELLIS.”
Why not just trade Randolph Morris for Dwight Howard and Al Horford for LeBron while you’re at it?
PG MONTA ELLIS SG WHO GIVES A SH!T SF LEBRON PF SMOOVE C DWIGHT HOWARD
RESERVES DOMINIQUE WILKINS BOB PETTIT JAMES NAISMITH SOLOMON ALABI
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
Give me a f-cking break man. You’re wasting space with this bullsh-t.
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
5:11 am
@northcyde
i agree that putting our hopes in teague is risky but you are acting like andre miller is 5 yrs younger.. i’ll take him 5 yrs ago, but his age and lack of athleticism are finally catching up and his inability to shoot is more evident than ever.. i agree that a 7.2 career assist average is more than modest, but on the downside of his career, his numbers are only going to get worse.. teague would certainly average at least 7 assists with starters’ minutes regardless of how much he can’t shoot or defend (just like Miller).. and to say Teague can’t finish is a joke – he had more dunks than randmo, joe smith, jason collins, and zaza combined, while averaging less than 10 minutes a game.. i don’t believe andre miller has ever even dunked the ball.. please don’t tell me HE would make this team better.. on the JJ front, if we can’t sign and trade him, we gotta let him walk – he’s just NOT worth a max deal for 4 or 5 years.. Ray Allen is more than a servicable replacement in the interim.. as far as coaches are concerned, i’m wondering if you REALLY think Avery Johnson is any better than Mark Jackson.. we are talking about a guy who went from retired player, to analyst, to 2-year stint in Dallas with loads of talent (and no postseason success), and then back to analyst/coach/GM wannabe.. the hawks would’ve done no worse this past season had Mark Jackson been the coach.. i don’t really want MJ, but as far as guys who have been interviewed, his personality suits our team best.. he could be the next doc rivers – avery certainly is not.. you’ve got to give guys a chance sometime.. if you have any better suggestions, i welcome them, but re-signing JJ and bringing in Avery will NOT get us ‘over the hump’ – we’ll be out in the 2nd round at best.. we need a revolution, not another regime!
tony
June 2nd, 2010
5:40 am
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith, no one really knows how well a new hc will pend out because there are so many different things you have to factor in in order to become a good hc. I think the biggest hurdle for any new hc to overcome is the way he deals with his players personalities. That’s first and foremost. Having people skills and having the ability to motivate players is a most!
What type of coach would you want to play for? Would you rather play for a coach who came from a championship organization or someone who has no championship background at all? Let’s look at it from this angle. If you were going to invest your hard earn money with someone, would you rather invest it with a successful business partner or with someone who had no success at all? I’m sure we both know the answer to that question.
I think the logical thing to do in terms of hiring a hc would be to hire someone with a championship background. I like your Robert Horry suggestion, but like you said, he doesn’t have coaching experience. I like Avery Johnson, Byron Scott, Bill Laimbeer, Mario Elie, and Michael Cooper. I just want to win man! I want a CHAMPIONSHIP!
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
5:45 am
oh, and northcyde: other guys averaging 7 assists for their career who are active: LBJ, B. Davis, Rondo, D-Wade, R. Westbrook, and even Ray Felton has a career 6.4 average … the point is that Andre Miller will only be less productive in the few years he has left and his style of play is completely the opposite of what we need considering our personnel – he’s methodical, half-court, and increasingly more inefficient.. 5.4 to 2.2 assist to turnover ratio last year.. the man is 6′2, OVER 200 lbs, and 34 – not the answer! don’t forget he’s signed for 2 more years at 7 million per.. portland is stuck with him and nobody wants him.. much like we are with the bibster.. teague is a fraction of the cost and we need to see what we have here.. i’m not even a big teague fan, but he’s the answer for now, barring a trade that fits our personnel and chemistry.. Bring on more coaching suggestions!!
blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith
June 2nd, 2010
5:57 am
tony,
i completely agree with you and i’m with ya!! .. in fact, Byron Scott is perfect – i keep sleeping on him because we only hear about those being “interviewed” .. i hope RS is looking at more than what the media tells us.. i think most of the other guys you mentioned fall more into the robert horry category, regarless of “experience” or not .. sometimes, people have intangible qualities that make them suitable to lead even if they never reached the promised land as a player (a la doc rivers) .. consider that larry brown never even played in the nba but was known as a leader and knowledgable entity of the game, so therefore got into coaching after his college career was over.. certain guys are bred to be leaders as coaches and other guys are too power hungry or too submissive .. i think mark jackson could be a sleeping giant, but he might turn out to be sam mitchell or vinny del negro (both decent guys, did the best with what they had, but not ‘championship’ coaches) .. i just want a title too .. B. Scott has the personality and commands the respect that we need – i’d love to hear his name in the mix .. he certainly has the champ pedigree .. we shall see!
Melvin Flowers Macon Ga
June 2nd, 2010
6:24 am
Avery Will Make The Hawks A Better Team For Now And The Future. First Of All The Hawks Want Be Able To Do What They Want On The Floor With Avery. You Got To Follow Team Rules Or Sit.
Its Time To Get To The Next Level Bring On Avery And Get Past The Second Round In Play-Offs Next Season.
We Have Seen Coaches In The Past Have No Control Of Players: DO WE NEED ANOTHER WEAK COACH FOR 4 MORE YEARS. BRING ON A WINNER, I VOTE FOR AVERY JOHNSON.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
6:48 am
No comment on my Smith for Gortat & Bass deal? Everybody wants a true center, and I’m giving you a 26 yr old that blocks shots, rebounds, and is a good locker room guy. I’m also giving you a 25 yr old, high energy backup PF that plays defense, rebounds, and has an improving mid-range game. This could be done before the draft and our front court would be set with Horford / Bass / Gortat / Pachulia. Grab a 5th big like Petro in free agency, and use the draft, MLE, and rights to Joe & Chill to figure out the guards and SF positions.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
6:54 am
For guards and SFs…..Cleveland is looking for a 1st round pick. I’d trade them Bibby (who they’ve had interest in before) & the 24th pick for Delonte West (who can be cut because his salary in non-guaranteed)…..Re-sign Joe & Chill….Use the full MLE on John Salmons….Use this year’s 2nd, next year’s 2nd and Houston’s 2nd next year if needed, to trade up and draft Vasquez.
Teague / Crawford
Johnson / Salmons / Vasquez
Williams / Childress
Horford / Bass
Gortat / Pachulia / Petro
Most of this is very reasonable except for the Bibby deal (who knows), and whether Salmons will take a deal to be Joe’s backup.
John Brown
June 2nd, 2010
7:08 am
We’re debating over which looks better – the rotting apple or the rotting orange. Not gonna argue over garbage.
John Brown
June 2nd, 2010
7:09 am
Even if this offseason it’s hot garbarge…
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
7:17 am
Northcyde,
To be fair, you should acknowledge the influence Woody played in these decisions. It was Woody who pushed for the core (Bibby, Marvin, and ZaZa to be resigned). Woody probably liked Bibby over Miller because of Bibby’s 3pt shooting. And a good GM will consider his coach’s recommendations when making these decisions, although the GM has the final say.
But I agree with you on some of the moves. I was in favor of letting Bibby go. And I was okay with Andre Miller (who ended up signing for 2 years $14 mil, 3rd year team option, compared to Bibby 3 years guaranteed). That 3rd year guarantee to Bibby now looms large, because he would have been an expiring contract and tradeable.
I like Chills game, and think he would be a good fit at SF for us. But if he doesn’t want to be here (or if Sund does not want to pay him), then trade him and take what you can get for him (I don’t think you should just cut him, because he still has some value around the league). But if you can get a decent bench player and a draft pick, make a move to resolve the situation.
Marvin’s deal was fair, but what I did not like about the Marvin deal, was Sund did not let the market set his value.
I like the Crawford deal, because if JJ walks away, at least we have a decent option at SG. And if JJ resigns, Crawford is an expiring who can be used in a trade.
If Blair was drafted, I don’t think he would have gotten consistent PT from Woody. Woody talked about how big it was to sign a proven guy like Joe Smith, but yet Smith ended up with inconsistent PT too (not that he played all that well when he was in the game). But the one thing that concerned me about Blair was that he’s had 2 foot/knee surgeries already.
Although Woody is part of the reason for the team’s issues, the players are a HUGE part of it too. And that’s why (looking back), I don’t think Sund should have given Woody an extension 2 years ago. Because we don’t know if these players will look better under a different coach. Letting Woody go 2 years ago would have given Sund an opportunity to evaluate these players for at least 2 years under a different coach, then he could see which player needs to be traded.
John Brown
June 2nd, 2010
7:18 am
And as for Smith for Gortat and Bass? Are you insane? Have you ever watched the NBA before? That has to be the most idiotic trade suggestion I’ve heard since Pau Gasol for Kwame Brown. Now wait…that’s a better deal than the one you suggest….for Memphis!!!! Bring in 2 losers who don’t even start on their choking losing team to replace arguably our best overall player? You must be Jerry West!!! Or Otis Smith one. Dumb Dumb Dumb. Gortat is adequate at best. Bass is a PF backup at best. Josh is an All Star(snub). You know what Jo Jo. Root for the Magic! You love their subs so much obviously. Trade our future for their chokers? No thanks.
Jackson
June 2nd, 2010
8:16 am
Garrett Siler…After a year in China, he is a sleeping giant. Almost kept him last year, better get him before Miami does.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
8:22 am
john brown….”their chokers” beat down your all star (snub). josh smith was whining to anyone that would listen, which was no one. at least gortat and bass came out after their loss and said we need more playing time. it’s not their fault that Van Gundy runs Dwight and 4 shooters all game long. dallas thought enough of gortat to offer him their starting center position before orlando matched. who better to defend dwight howard than the guy that has gone against him in practice every day for the last two years. the trade balances the hawks’ roster. no more guys playing out of position.
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
8:27 am
NORTHCYDE/CDOG-You’re saying you blame Sund for doing exactly what Woodson wanted him to do:
(1) resigning Bibby, Marvin and Zaza was Woodson’s stated preference.
(2) drafting JTeague was Woodson’s choice, not Sund’s.
(3) Woodson, not Sund, determined who made the active squad.
(4) It was Woodson’s OFF philosophy that emphasize outside shooting, and he definitely wanted a jump shooting PG, not a pass first, penetrating PG.
(5) It was Woodson’s stupid decision to start and give major mins to MBibby, the NBA’s slowest, LEAST athletic, LEAST productive, LEAST consistent, none penetrating and none DEF starting PG.
(5) It was Woodson’s stupid decision to:
(6) limit the use of his bench,
(7) refuse to develop and/or utilize his young players,
(8) continued using a 6 man rotation in the 2nd half of gms, after claiming he’d never try it again after it failed miserably the 1st time.
(8) refused to make a single lineup change or adjustment of any kind, even when 2 starters had regressed to the point of hurting the team.
(9) refused to make OFF and DEF adjustments during gms, especially in the playoffs when it was desperately needed.
(10) lose the respect of the very key players he depended on to a fault, even to the point where they stopped listening to anything he said or wanted them to do.
IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS TO ANYONE NOT BLINDED BY AN OBSESSION OR ADDICTION, THAT THE PLAYERS’ WANTED WOODSON OUT AS HC, AS EVIDENCED BY THEIR LACKLUSTER PERFOMANCES, REFUSAL TO FOLLOW HIS INSTRUCTIONS, AND DEMONSTRATED LACK OF RESPECT FOR HIM AS THEIR HC.
THAT CAN’T BE BLAMED ON SUND OR ANYONE ELSE, OTHER THAN WOODSON HIMSELF.
JEWELL ROLLEN
June 2nd, 2010
8:34 am
PLEASE DO NOT MENTION DARKO’S NAME AND HAWKS BASKETBALL IN THE SAME SENTENCE….THANKS….
The Ayatollah
June 2nd, 2010
8:39 am
Ah yes, the summer of hindsight, which as we all know is 20/20.
I like how Northcyde envisions all the things Rick Sund coulda,shoulda done to put us in better position free agency-wise this summer. Gee, never heard any of this during the regular season when we were talking about how mentally tough this team was and how the great Woodson and Joe Johnson were, taking the team to new limits. Wait, didn’t the same Northcyde say this team was soft, afterwards? Woodson was mentally tough. As in stubborn as a rock. Good riddance, he could have done no better for this team than he did, and it was not enough. Stop crying for him already.
The idea that Rick Sund should not have traded Craig Claxton and Acie Law for Jamal Crawford is pure lunacy and only something a Mike Woodson fan would think up. Claxton either could not or would not play anymore. Has anybody heard from him since? Woodson did not like Acie Law or the way he played. He made comments after he left about Jeff Teague having more of a point guard game. Acie, who never said anything against Woodson while he was here, said that Woodson never really respected his game. That is believeable, but unfortunately Acie did not do well in other places either. The point is, Rick Sund exchanged two guys Woodson had no use for, for a guy that Woodson was very glad to have. Jamal Crawford ended up winning Sixth Man of the Year, so to say this was a bad move is incredibly ignorant. As it is, no way do the Hawks win 53 games with Craig and Acie, as opposed to Jamal. No, it did not work in the playoffs. Neither did Joe Johnson. Kept waiting for him to show up, which he did in maybe two or three games. Even then, he was average. The rest of the time, he stunk like a bag of dead shrimp left out in the summer heat. Elite, my arse.
Andre Miller. Where should one start? Let us go with the following things we know. Miller got the Portland Blazers where? First round loss. Feuded with the coach early in the season over playing time and starting or bench status. If you think he had issues with Nate McMillan, imagine him having to deal with the incredibly stubborn and vision-less Mike Woodson. I smell nuclear meltdown. Despite all of this, Miller would have been a better option at point guard for the Hawks. However, Mike Woodson wanted Mike Bibby and nothing else. He made it abundantly clear. Blame Rick Sund all you want, but he gave Mike Woodson what he wanted. I struggle to understand how it is that Rick Sund giving the supposedly great Mike Woodson what he wanted, is a bad thing, if you like Mike Woodson. It does not make sense. Well, that is unless of course you are looking to bash Sund and exalt the now jobless Woodson. Now the whole thing makes sense, aye?
Bringing in Allen Iverson would have been an equally stupid idea as not trading for Jamal Crawford. Iverson could not even stay in the NBA because he was such a disruptive force in the locker room. Memphis found that out quickly, but Lionel Hollins is a smart man and squashed the situation before it got out of hand. Mike Woodson would have let it go and fubared it for certain. Woe be to the team who picks him up as a head coach. Give him an assistant job, he is much better that way. The man is a fool with little or no vision. He showed he could not get his team to listen. Not Mike Bibby, not Joe Johnson, not Josh Smith, not Al Horford. Not even Jamal. That smacks of ineptitude. Remember how it was in the playoffs against Milwaukee when Woodson finally came up with a different idea than switching back and forth on defense. Joe Johnson said they were glad to try something different because what they had done all season was not working in the playoffs. What might that tell you? Nothing, if you are a fan of Mike Woodson.
DeJuan Blair landed precisely where he needed to be. Mike Woodson would have treated him like he did Jeff Teague. Gregg Popovich understood the value of a contributor, regardless of age and experience. He showed that with both Blair and George Hill, who was drafted very late in the first round and got nobody’s attention. Neither player would have sniffed more than eight or ten garbage minutes per game with Mike Woodson. Blair would have been wanting out like Solomon Jones did. Mike Woodson is gone, thank the stars.
You can always tell a narrow minded and agenda driven individual. Loves Mike Woodson, adores the fan hating Joe Johnson, hates Rick Sund, hates Jamal Crawford, blah blah blah blah blah. Get over it if you are a true fan of the team. Suck it up and move on, or shut your yammering skull cave. Although, it is probably obvious that such persons are anxiously awaiting the departure of Joe Johnson and are hoping for the team to not do well. Then they can post all year long about how bad Sund is, and how bad they miss their best friends Mike and Joe. What a sad life that must be. Suck it up.
hawkfanman
June 2nd, 2010
8:43 am
Y’ALL NEVER SHOULD LISTEN TO A WOODY LOVER, IF YA DIDN’T KNOW THAT BY NOW
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
8:48 am
Instead of suggesting all sorts of trades, and breaking up the core, why not consider the following. With the likelihood of us hiring a HC that actually has the ability and/or inclination to develop and utilize his bench and young talent, we could draft that young 7′ European center. He’s aggressive, very mobile, with tremendous OFF skills, and an excellent shooting touch, with range. Then sign GSiler, who’s big, strong and physical.
Combine those 2 with Zaza and you have a 3 headed center backing up Horford that gives us size, depth and versatility, as well as match up advantages in most situations, without costing much money. Then we could use our exemption(s) to sign a replacement for JJ, if he leaves, and a backup or replacement for Marvin.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
8:51 am
Ken, sorry but it may be all what Woody’s wanted, but it still was ultimately Sund’s decision! Sund could’ve held ground and to inform Woody of the type of team that he wanted to build, the way that BK did. Aside from Speedy Claxton, BK drafted the type of players that he thought would be able to be interchangeable. Til this day I still think BK is a better GM than Sund is. For one, it took Sund 2 seasons to realize what BK knew three years ago, that Woody couldn’t take this team far. Sund has been giving a lot more resources than BK was even granted in terms of money. And Sund is also operating without the dark ownership cloud operating over his head. Out of the top seven players on the Hawks, Sund has only brought in one of them, Crawford (JJ, Josh, Al, Bibby, Marvin, Zaza, Crawford).
Everyone talks about BK misses in two main drafts. But they fail to mention that BK has drafted three all-stars, and two for the Hawks (Gasol— Horford, and Josh). 2 out of 4 isn’t bad, especially when the two you hit on are future all stars, and one of them is an all defensive player. BK’s career in the draft isn’t any worse than Donnie Walsh’s, Larry Bird, Kiki, Jerry West, Rod Thorn, Pat Riley’s, and many others. Many of them hit 50% of the time, and miss 50% of the time. When BK was here, the Hawks weren’t willing to take on an additional contract like Crawford’s.
robdawg08
June 2nd, 2010
8:53 am
After reading all these comments, it is certain the Hawks will :
A)Not sign a F/A center and draft a “Project” who likely won’t ever pan out (Priest Lauderdale anyone ?).
B)Sign one of the “fill the lane” bodies that really can’t guard scorers or score themselves (Haywood,Pryz,etc.).
C)Sign Shaq so he can make rap videos in the ATL and stay injured for about 45 of the 82 games and loaf in all the other games.
Basically this financially strapped team due to insane contracts for JJ,Bibby,and J.Smith will not have a good center in 2011. No big deal since they’ve NEVER had a good center in their franchise history (save a decrepit M.Malone).
All the good teams as far as you go back had good centers (D.Robinson,Walton,Kareem,Parish,Ewing,Olajuwon,D.Howard,Gasol).
Damn !
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
8:55 am
Ken, I’m for that agreement. I think this same roster (even though I would add Haywood, Brewer, and/or Felton) can be successful next year, and it would truly depend on the development of Teague. I think most of it will depend on Teague’s attitude. If Teague comes out with an attack mindset on the defense and offensive end, then this team will bring a different mentality totally. Aside from JJ and Mario, you never seen any one (also aside from Teague) pressure the ball all the way up court. I think small things like that will give a mental advantage to the Hawks over many other teams because the entire starting lineup are so good in the passing lanes.
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
8:59 am
AYATOLLAH-THAT ABSOLUTELY SAYS IT ALL!!!!!!!!!
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
9:02 am
Robdawg, the Bulls didn’t have a real good center. The Piston had Ben Wallace, and he’s no better than Horford is (no taller either). The Bad Boys Pistons only had Laimbeer who is grossly overrated. In the late 80s Parrish was injured majority of the times, yet it still didn’t stop Boston from winning multiples.
Suck on this!
June 2nd, 2010
9:02 am
How about Al (I refuse to play defense) horford and turnover teague for Amare Stodumire and a player to be named later
Fire Sund and Michael Cunningham!
HawkKingBibby
June 2nd, 2010
9:15 am
@the supposed ghost of Sekou Smith: I know your really not the ghost of Sekou because Sekou could never write that many words without typing the name Kobe at least 10 times. Also MC has a good understanding of something Sekou could never quite figure out and that is a little thing called the NBA SALARY CAP. Its kind of pointless to throw trades and potential free agent signings out there without knowledge of it.
drmaryb
June 2nd, 2010
9:16 am
Bottom Line
@ #24 we have to pick the best BIG available!
Bottom Line!
drmaryb
June 2nd, 2010
9:19 am
HawkingB. @ 915 AM
Thank God! & Co-Sign that !!!
Geez what’s with all the dreamers?
Suck on this!
June 2nd, 2010
9:19 am
Horford is the odd man out. He really hasnt improved very much even with all the twiking Woodson did with him last year he only average 1f baskets more per game over his career average. He ranks very, low defensively and refuses to challenge in the post. He doesnt block shots and is ranked # 18th among centers in that category. He commits 2 fouls for every block and opposing teams love, to run plays isolating him under the basket. He and Bibby are the man reasons Woodson was force to use the switch, having to rotate to compensate for their defensive liability.
Trade horford because he is only a power forward and not as good a powerforward as josh, the # 2 defensive player in the NBA.
Al horford
81 35.1 467-847 .551 1-1 1.000 213-270 .789 2.9 7.0 9.9 .73 1.12 1.51 2.78 2.3 14.2
Career 229 33.3 1112-2109 .527 1-7 .143 517-687 .753 2.7 6.9 9.6 .75 1.14 1.58 2.98 2.1 12.0
Josh Smith (with out being twiked by woodson is still better offensively and tremendously better defensively as a power forward than horford will ever be. Josh is more of a complete player than horford, whos claim to fame is he gets the rebound after josh plays defense or blocks some shots….
Josh Smith
Season 81 35.4 504-999 .505 0-7 .000 261-422 .618 2.8 6.0 8.7 1.60 2.14 2.44 2.96 4.2 15.7
Career 457 33.7 2479-5350 .463 127-478 .266 1446-2166 .668 2.2 5.4 7.6 1.25 2.34 2.47 2.96 2.9 14.3
Suck on this!
June 2nd, 2010
9:24 am
What ever center we get he will be our STARTING CENTER! So trade I cant block shots horford.
By the way. I wish you well on your prostrate cancer ken. You and I disagree, but I do wish you well as a person.
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
9:26 am
Dang, the canniblogging is fierce in here, LOL.
Ayatollah sounds like somebody who has paid attention to the Woody Wars….can’t say I disagree with much he says…
Ramon
How is it that Sund has more resources than Knight had? Unless the owners are lying to us (and all the media quotes), they’ve been losing money out the a$$ all this time. Speaking of resources, Billy Knight had the draft as a major one. If you ask me, Knight had more resources than Sund has had.
It took Knight more than two years to start trying to fire Woody. He never succeeded, and even got himself pushed out the door. Sund on the other hand, was smarter about it. He gave Woody (clearly somebody whom the owners favored if they didn’t let Knight fire him) a 2 year extension and a lot of what he wanted on the roster. Then, when Woody proved he could only go so far with it, Sund successfully removed him from the picture.
I really don’t see how Knight had less resources and was a better GM. Sund has been here less time, and only had one draft. We can compare draft results and free agency moves.
DRAFT:
Knight-
Out of 15 draft picks, only two turned out really well for us: Al Horford and Josh Smith. Childress turned out well, but Woody botched part of that job, then Sund gambled and lost him. Diaw hated playing for Woodson, and turned into part of a large package deal for Joe Johnson. Marvin Williams was the highest pick Billy had with this team, and he has become a default rotation player. Good luck finding who to blame between Billy, Woody, and Marvin himself on that one…
Rick Sund-
Jeff Teague (jury is out, gets to actually have a rookie season now), Sergei Gladyr (pick stashed overseas, may never even join the team). I think I’d give Sund a few more chances at the draft (he’s only had ONE with this team) and some higher picks before trying to compare him to Knight. In addition, the draft is the cheapest way to add to the team….
Free agency-
Billy Knight – Tyronne Lue, Speedy Claxton, Anthony Johnson, Lorenzen Wright, Zaza Pachulia, Mike Bibby, and some scrubs like Slava Medvedenko, Matt Freijie, etc…
Rick Sund- re-upped Zaza, Bibby, and Marvin. Jamal Crawford, Mo Evans, Flip Murray, Joe Smith, RandMo, among the notables.
Again, I’d give Sund a little longer before drawing the line between the two. Sund has not had the advantage of the draft at all, really hard to compare notes there.
However, this summer will go a long ways in determining what he’s made of. I wouldn’t want his job, but I’m sure glad that some on this blog don’t have it…
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
9:28 am
Astro Joe
June 2nd, 2010
9:36 am
Other than Teague, name a 1st round pick that did not get time during his rookie season under Woody?
Even Acie received PT during the first half of his rookie season (when he didn’t have a back, wrist or hang-nail injury), until Bibby arrived and then he was able to discuss injuries with Speedy on the bench.
Go back and look at Salim’s rookie season (and he was a 2nd round pick). Look at Shelden, Josh, Josh, Marvin and Al as rookies. There’s a pattern.
Then read MC’s comments that “Teague struggled with team concepts” and it seems somewhat plausible that maybe, just maybe, Teague’s mental approach to the game had something to do with his playing time. Oh and I’ll add the recent radio interview with Sund who indicated that he asked Woody to play Teague during home games and that he was satisfied with the way Teague was used this past season. And presumably, Sund and Pendergraph have a little better insight into what happens in practice than anyone around here. The good news is that if Teague did have some issues from the neck up, that can be addressed over time. There’s no need to write him off but there may have been a legit reason why rewarding him with PT would have not been in his best long-term interests. If he returns with an understanding that pro ball requires more than athletic ability (or else you become Gerald Green), then that would have been a great rookie lesson to learn.
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
9:41 am
RAMON-I’m certain you’ve noticed that Sund isn’t a confrontational type GM like BK was. Rather than dictate what he wanted from Woodson, he gave him a 2yr extension, the players he wanted, room to operate, and the rope to hang himself, which he ended up doing. We’re in agreement on everything else. And, we can’t blame BK for not drafting either CP3 or DWilliams, since it was Woodson, not BK, who publicly stated his doubts about their ability to be productive at the NBA level.
As far as Teague’s attitude, he entered training camp and preseason with that attacking attitude, and was outstanding in both instances. We saw the same attitude and outstanding performance from ALaw and SStaudemire when they entered training camp and preseason. It was Woodson’s attitude and approach that caused their attitude and approach to change, as well as affect their overall confidence.
I definitely like the idea of signing Brewer, or even DWilkins, but I don’t think we have much chance of getting BHeywood. Dallas wants him back, and he knows he has a solid chance of replacing EDampier as their starting center. There’s no chance of him replacing AHorford, unless JSmith is traded. You don’t trade a young, talented, athletic, still improving and maturing talent like Smoove just to acquire a past his prime center who hasn’t equaled the performance of your current center.
Horford’s career scoring average of 12PPG is higher than Heywood’s highest single season scoring average of 10.2PPG. Heywood has a higher blocked shot average, but that’s due in part to him playing on teams with very porous DEF’s. Horford’s shot blocking total has been affected by him having to play out of position, like being forced to play PG’s and SG’s on the perimeter in Woodson’s beloved Bibby hiding switching DEF.
Hawkfan
June 2nd, 2010
9:41 am
Sign and trade JJ for Okafor /Chandler/ or Noah to move Horford to the 4. If you draft Alabi then you trade Zaza
Teague/ Crawford
Crawford/ Childress or M. Evans
Marvin/ Childress or M. Evans/ J. Smoove
J.Smoove/ Horford/ Marvin/ Zaza or Alabi
Horford/ (Okafor, Chandler. or Noah) Zaza or Alabi
2 years from now if Alabi turns to be a player then you trade Horford unless J. Smoove is still a baby and then we can’t blame coaching
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
9:48 am
Najeh davenpoop monta ellis want out of goldenstate he just sold his home out there and bought his new home in memphis, so why not do a sign and trade for him goldenstate already have a point guard and there are some must changes out there, maybe marvin and zaza for monta ellis can make the cut who noes but the hawks have make a strong decision on teague there is a big Q mark there.
GO HAWKS!!!!!
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
9:53 am
Ken, one question, do you remember what the salary of the roster was when BK arrived? Do you remember BK was brought in to REBUILD the entire roster, and that’s exactly what he did. You say it took him longer to fire Woody, that’s because Woody is a good REBUILDING coach, but BK realized that he wouldn’t be anything more than a rebuilding coach. Among the good things BK did, he refrained from making many bad signings (with the exception of Speedy). Remember Kenyon Martin, Eddy Curry, Dalembert, Dampier, Ray Allen, Chandler, and many others who came along and BK refused to give the keys to the franchise just to sign them because they weren’t worth it (although many on this blog thought they were). And once the JJ trade happened, and Belkin started rebuking the rest of the ownership, you seen the Hawks on ESPN more for court proceedings than you did for basketball. And if you remember for two entire seasons, the Hawks couldn’t make any trade or signings that would increase the payroll by a certain percentage without Belkin signing off on it. Now Sund only has to get approval from Gearon, and everything is ok.
I will say this though, the biggest mistake I think BK ever made wasn’t in the draft, but it was in trading Rasheed Wallace. Wallace would’ve just had to be mad at me because I would’ve kept him for the remainder of the season and tried to re-sign him.
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
9:56 am
THANKS TRUTH SERUM-You are living proof that when the chips are down, Hawk fans will always turn things around, THANKS.
ASTRO JOE-you brought up a good point. In every case, except for Horford, JChildress and JSmith, rookies regressed after their rookie yr under Woodson. At least those who actually got a chance to play.
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
9:58 am
Marvin and zaza for ellis is a good trade for both team, marvin and zaza could starte day one.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!
allan in texas
June 2nd, 2010
10:00 am
There is a rumor out there that Minnesota is willing to move the #4 pick with Al Jefferson for a proven veteran. Would you be willing to move Josh Smith and our #1 pick for Jefferson and their #1 pick?
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
10:00 am
Ken we agree on most that you stated. I realize Haywood probably would be too hard to sign. The only problem is if the Hawks make a push for Haywood quickly, would Dallas be too involved in negotiations with Dirk to be able to react? Also, I would never want Haywood to start. I don’t think the Hawks need a starting center. I think the Hawks needs a defensive center who can come in 20-30 minutes a game. If Pryzbilla was healthier during the season, then I’d be screaming out his name.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
10:03 am
Allan, one word – NO! A front line of Al and Jefferson would be too stiff on the front line. And Jefferson really isn’t all that athletic to match up with Dwight Howard anyway. I’d move Crawford, Zaza, and our 1st for Jefferson and the 4th pick.
Crash001
June 2nd, 2010
10:27 am
Here is the solution: Sign JJ and trade him and ZAZA to free up salary cap space. Sign a free agent that can help the team and resign Randolp Morris, he a good player but was poorly coach.
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
10:30 am
Ramon,
I don’t think there is any way Dallas lets Haywood leave. Mark Cuban will pay him to stay (Dampier is an expiring, and only partially guaranteed), so Haywood will be the starter. If he comes here, he will be the backup.
And keep in mind that Rick Sund usually takes his own (slow) time anyway, so I don’t see Sund making any moves until the JJ situation is resolved. Plus if JJ leaves in a sign and trade, he wont be sure what he can get in return. And if JJ stays, I hope Sund explores trading Crawford.
For those calling for Siler, I think Dexter Pittman in the second round is a better selection. Pittman played at a big time program (Texas), and looked decent (when he wasn’t fouling out, or being too tired). If he gets his weight and endurance under control, he could provide spot minutes at Center.
Maurice Cheeks (former sixers HC and now an assistant with OKC) is available too. Anyone interested? Regardless of who we hire, I just hope he has an experienced group of assistants, and I hope he is flexible.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
10:40 am
O’Brien, I hope Sund considers signing everyone not named Horford and Josh.
i_am_soulstar
June 2nd, 2010
10:43 am
Everyone’s talking about a starting center, but is Josh Smith moving to small forward really a great idea?
With his average ball-handling and below average jumpshot, I wasn’t so sure at first. But then I began to think, wouldn’t he be an upgrade over Marvin Williams? I could go either way with one. But this only works if Joe comes back, considering our offensive output may drop a bit with Josh playing out of the post, as he’s likely to take more low percentage shots.
Still, the Hawks probably should make a run at Haywood. Not that I actually agree that Horford isn’t an above average center, but we can infer from his comments that the guy just doesn’t seem happy to be playing center. And like the saying goes, always take care of those who take care of you. The last thing any team needs is an unhappy star. Those teams usually don’t perform so well.
i_am_soulstar
June 2nd, 2010
10:47 am
Great point Astro Joe.
Rod from College Park
June 2nd, 2010
10:59 am
Thanks Big Ray and O’Brien. I have no idea what game Rufus1 is watching. I do recall Hinrich guarding MArvin in the post this year, and being successful.
i_am_soulstar
June 2nd, 2010
11:00 am
We’re already have “middle of the pack” status when it comes to defense. Can’t quite afford to lose Josh just yet folks.
The guy’s PER always hovers around #20 in the league. I’m not ready to say goodbye to that.
Dr. D.
June 2nd, 2010
11:00 am
Michael, is it possible that Sund is waiting for Dallas to come knocking for Joe? The Hawks could trade Joe & Bibby for Dampier and Caron Butler. Of course Dampier’s contract would be voided and leave the hawks with cap space to grab a combo guard (mike miller/anthony morrow). Next, they could try and trade J. Crawford for a draft pick and acquire a young big in the draft. With the 24th draft pick select Dominique Jones/Terrico White and improve their perimeter defence. Does any of this make GM logic?
Rod from College Park
June 2nd, 2010
11:03 am
i_am_soulstar,
Yes regarless of what everyone says about Josh and his jumpshot, he would be a tremendous upgrade over Marvin at the 3. It’s not a perfect situation for him, but he would be an upgrade. He has better handles than Marvin. I can’t recall Marvin driblling more than 3 to 4 times without passing or falling down. He would be better at everything other than free-throw shooting and long jumpshots.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
11:22 am
Ramon – Don’t give BK cred for drafting Gasol
then pre-arranging a trade prior to the draft
for SAR. If he knew Gasol was gonna be Gasol
then why arrange a trade before the draft.
Obviously *Portland orchestrated the choice.
*[or Vancouver or where-ever the heck SAR came from]
((( Bravo Mr. Strickland )))
JoJo the Godfather:
Your trade as was concieved (including Josh) I must defer.
However, a smaller transaction, picking up Bass – I’m most
comfortable with. Although Orl. would be reluctant to trade
within the division.
ReddJonn68
June 2nd, 2010
12:03 pm
This copycat league is the reason the Hawks will never win. Seems we are always monkey see monkey do when it comes 2 making any sound moves. I’ve said it before & will say it again we will regret not actually taking Mark Jackson as our next coach, this guy reminds me of Doc. Someone had 2 take a chance on Doc, why can’t we break the mold & take Jackson.Don’t forget that we listened to the so-called experts about a “can’t miss pick” when we took Marvin in the draft. Also when rating these centers some may fill part of what’s needed, because it was obvious we could used some inside help in the playoffs. As stated in the article Orlando has two centers & completely got outplayed & outhustled, as did we. Whatever player or players this franchise drafts or brings in via free agency, better have two things that are not in the scouting reports or stats Toughness & Hustle !!!!!
Tim Todo
June 2nd, 2010
12:07 pm
we need to try and get Javale McGee from the Washington Wizards.this guy gives the hawks bigs much trouble when they play them.he,s young and can run the floor really well,he would be a graet addition to our team real good defense also. Mr Sund please give it some thought
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
12:11 pm
Rod ,
Admittedly, Marvin seems to be somewhat allergic to dribbling the ball. Only the year before last did he finally learn how to take good angles to the basket, making me think he was finally “getting there.” Then he promptly forgot that this last year and went back to flopping and flailing at the first sign of contact on the way to the hoop. Weird.
To be honest, I always hoped he would be steady and serviceable, I would have been okay (though not at all thrilled) with a 14 and 6 type, as long as he played maddeningly stingy defense and developed a 3 point shot. Both were largely absent this past season. At this point I’m not convinced that even a different coach would be that much of a help, but I could be wrong about that. I know I can’t stand another year of 10 and 5 with 44% shooting at the SF spot with multiple disappearnces, I can tell ya that….
cp
June 2nd, 2010
12:13 pm
The Ayatollah yea you’re post pretty much summed it up perfectly.
Sautee
June 2nd, 2010
12:17 pm
Truth-serum,
The playoffs are ultimately what matters, right?
In the playoffs Al Horford averaged MORE BLOCKED SHOTS than Andrew Bynum, Brenden Haywood, Joakim Noah, and Shaq.
He was 4th among all centers in the playoffs in blocks per game.
And don’t give me that “well he was playing against a second string center b.s.”
Most of his blocks against Milwaukee were against penetrating guards.
That said, I question your premise that blocked shots are SO important. Did it help Orlando against Boston to have the best shot blocker in the league?
If blocked shots were all it took than why isn’t Orlando still playing?
cp
June 2nd, 2010
12:17 pm
lol Big Ray. If you are still willing to see what Marvin can do with a new coach then my brother you have a lot more patience than me. I have given up all hope with that cat. I just don’t see how a new coach will be able to fix things such as his inability to finish in traffic, dribble the ball without falling and the many other goofy things he does on the court. Like I keep saying, that last game of the season really opened my eyes about Marvin. Dude was playing with the second string and did not stand out at all. In fact he looked worse than some of the guys who normally sit at the bench. I really wish I could see footage of what Duck did in that workout. I just want to see what the hell he was doing that made them think he was the choice.
All I'm Saying Is...
June 2nd, 2010
12:23 pm
Since it appears that a veteran Center that is solid and not spectacular (which is all we need) is not likely available, looks like we’ll need to get creative.
Is Thabeet still in the doghouse in Memphis? Is he worth the risk?
What about Garrett Siler? Should we bring him back and stick him in there? I thought he looked okay during training camp.
Also, Randolph Morris, truth be told, never got a chance here in Atlanta due to his immaturity in his first year or so and Woody’s reluctance to play any of our young guys during the past season so I say keep him and PLAY HIM!
LET’S GO HAWKS!
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
12:34 pm
CP ,
Actually my patience is up, which is why I said I’m not convinced that a new coach could help the situation. The only reason I’m going to see what happens is because unless Sund trades him, we’re stuck watching him again….
Like you, I have NO idea what it was that made him so attractive to anybody, for him to be projected that high, much less actually picked that high. But Sund re-signed him, so here we are. Then again, I don’t think anybody ever expected him to get worse in his fifth year, either.
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
12:35 pm
cp,
There was a rumor that Marvin was tired (out of shape maybe), and struggled to finish his workout with the Hawks.
Ray,
If Marvin can average 12 and 6, but play defense capable of third team all NBA defense, and knock down the open shot (especially the 3) at big moments, I would be okay with that.
The undrafted Bruce Bowen has a career average of 6 and 3. However, he made all NBA defense (first or second team) 8 times, and he could be counted on to make the corner 3.
Thats what Marvin’s role should be. Can he do it? Only Marvin knows.
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
12:40 pm
Found these quotes on the internet (accessnorthgeorgia.com);
Atlanta coach Mike Woodson said he was impressed with Williams’ range and shooting abilities. “He’ll be a pretty damn good player in our league. He works his butt off,” Woodson said.
Woodson said he only wished that the 6-foot-9 Williams had worked out against another player.
“It’s tough when you put a guy through an individual workout without someone to compare him against,” Woodson said. “But we have to respect that and work around that.”
If Marvin had worked out against another player, maybe they would have seen him stumbling and fumbling, and getting his shot blocked. At least we know what they liked in Marvin. His range and shooting abilities. Where has his range gone? I dont know…
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
12:55 pm
Josh is not going any where because he is a better 4 than Al will ever be. Whatz up Itty bitty Ray Ray.
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
12:57 pm
Ray’s Thinking pattern….”Woodson is responsible for the Great Depression…..Yep, fire Woodson!”
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
12:58 pm
time to rebuild
Rufus1
June 2nd, 2010
1:01 pm
Rod
I am not saying Marvin is Great, but I will not trade CRABS(Marvin) for HERPES(Deng, Hinrich or Turk)..
Rod from College Park
June 2nd, 2010
1:01 pm
Ah the infamous workout. He hit all his jumpshots with no one checking him. If you go to the games now, his does that pre-game as well. He’s the classic looks good walking in the gym guy. It really makes you wonder about this organization, to take a guy that high without having him work out against anyone. This ain’t the globetrotters, it’s a professional basketball organization. Did they consider that maybe he just got hot that day, like he did agianst San Antonio this year? I’m over the draft part, the resign it what bothers me now.
northcyde
June 2nd, 2010
1:02 pm
(( shrugging shoulders ))
Like I said .. .the ASG should’ve just named Woody the GM, if all Sund was doing was giving Woody everything he wanted.
Everybody in this fan base knew that Woody coached the Hawks to win every game possible last year. The dude didn’t have the job security to try to develop people, because if it had backfired, he would’ve been fired midway through the season. Let the Hawks have been 12 – 13 around Christmas, the FIRE WOODY drums would’ve been beating like you were at a soccer game in Brazil.
And I never said the moves Sund did last season were bad. We won 53 games, and Crawford is a big reason why we won those extra 6 games this year. I thoroughly enjoyed what we did last year, ( even though the same people who questioning me now, complained about the team and the coach all year ). It’s unfortunate how the playoffs turned out, with both the coach and players melting down at the worse possible time. But I’ll always remember how great of a regular season we had last year.
Having said that . . . understand that when you make the Crawford move, it takes you right out of the 2010 free agency sweepstakes. Crawford’s 10 million on the books is the difference between us having almost 20 million under the cap ( if we renounced everybody, including JJ and Chill ), instead of 8 million, if we do that this summer.
*******************************
Forget a trade for Andre Miller. Say we DON’T do that, and DON’T do a Crawford trade . . but instead do everything else . . this is your Hawks team last year, along with what they’d make:
PG – Bibby ( 6.2 mill )
G – JJ ( 15 mill )
F – Marvin ( 7.5 mill )
F – Smoove ( 10.8 mill )
C – Horford ( 4.3 mill )
Bench:
G – Acie ( 2.2 mill )
G – Teague ( 1.4 mill)
G/F – Evans ( 2.5 mill )
F – Joe Smith ( 1.3 mill )
C – Zaza ( 4.7 mill )
G – Speedy ( 5 mill )
C – Jason Collins ( 1.2 mill )
G – West ( .5 mill )
F – Hunter ( .3 mill )
Rough total: 63.8 mill
With this lineup, Woody is pretty much FORCED to play either Acie or Teague at the backup point. Or do like he did in the preseason of 2007, when he was playing Lue, Acie, and AJ as a “3-headed monster” at the point. Of course, Acie and Teague combined couldn’t give us what Crawford gave us. But it would’ve given us a decent look at each guard. With the way Bibby regressed throughout the year, the opportunity would’ve been there for one of the kids to step up and get major playing time.
Woody would still go with a short rotation, with Zaza and Evans being the main guys off the bench, along with Teague and Law splitting time at the backup PG ( unless one of them emerged as the solid backup ). And guys like Marvin, Horford and JJ would still have to play multiple positions.
That squad, unless we get real good play out of the Teague/Law combination coming off the bench . . or great play out of Marvin . . wins anywhere from 43 – 47 games. Our starters, for most of the year, would’ve still been good enough to beat most teams, but we’d struggle against the top level teams.
*****************************
Now . . let’s see what we would’ve had coming into 2010, as far as who would be under contract, and how much money they would make:
Smoove ( 11.6 mill )
Marvin ( 6.7 mill )
Bibby ( 5.6 mill )
Horford ( 5.4 mill )
Zaza ( 4.2 mill )
Teague ( 1.5 mill )
1st round pick ( 2 mill ? ) . . because the Hawks wouldn’t have won 50 games with that squad, and would be picking a little higher in the draft.
Rough total: 37 million
The cap holds of JJ and Chill would prevent the Hawks from doing something significant to change the team. You’re still talking about 27+ million in cap holds, which would put us 8 million over the 56 mill estimated salary cap.
Renounce everybody except JJ, and you’re looking at the Hawks still being just 2 million under the cap. Renounce everybody, including JJ, and all of a sudden, you become a MAJOR PLAYER in the free agency bonanza, with almost 20 million to spend under the cap.
And had Marvin been on his Qualifying Offer, that number could’ve been as high as 26 million ( if everybody was renounced, including Marvin ) . . or 10 million, had we renounced everybody but JJ.
The question then will be . . . would a major free agent come to Atlanta? ( which has always been a historical problem ). But even if the goal was to keep JJ, this team could potentially spend 10 million on a player, or multiple players, without even being over the salary cap . . . plus have the MLE to spend.
*************************************************
The job of a GM is to do whatever he can to make the team better, within the financial parameters that ownership sets. I don’t fault Sund for making the Crawford move. It made us a better team. It’s just unfortunate that it didn’t pay dividends in the playoffs, along with the coach and other players selling us out.
But if Woody was basically a “lame duck” coach if he didn’t get to the Eastern Conference Finals . . Sund could’ve easily put this team in position to be a player in the 2010 free agency sweepstakes, if worst came to worst with JJ.
Instead, Jamal Crawford is the likely replacement for JJ . . we’ll get a new coach . . and we still have PG and big man issues.
Facts are facts folks.
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
1:03 pm
saltee, I feel you. I too have been searching for a way to make Horford’s weak defensive 5 game look good, and , like you, I have had any success at it. The man will never have the type of defensive skills necessary to “man” the 5 post.
Hes proven that.
Time to trade him will he has some value. Hes peaked! with all that tweaking hes only 1 basket above his career average.
I guess you and me will have to sit and wait for the next center.
Sorry Florida fans.
Rod from College Park
June 2nd, 2010
1:04 pm
Rufus1,
You would be lucky to get anything above servicable for Marvin at this point, because that’s what he is. Those guys you listed are better than servicable.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
1:04 pm
Stats to support my Josh for Gortat & Bass trade.
Gortat blocks shots on a per minute basis at a higher rate than Josh. Based on 35 minutes a game this last year, Josh avgd 2.1 blocks per game. Gortat projects out to 2.4 over 35 minutes.
Gortat’s rebounding in superior. Josh’s rebound per 40 minute avg is 9.8, while Gortat’s is 12.5.
Josh scores at a higher rate, 17.7 per 40 minutes to Gortat’s 10.8, but guess what, Bass’s scoring rate is better than Josh’s at 17.9 per 40 minutes.
Both Gortat & Bass have a higher total shooting % than Josh (56.3%, 55.6%, and 53.6% respectively).
Josh is much better in the assists category. Not even close.
The value in this trade is not that far off. Don’t get caught up with not trading within the division. The trade makes sense for both sides.
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
1:07 pm
*havent had any success at making horford 5 game look good.
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
1:09 pm
Gortat is a center, josh a power forward. But I do agree that Gortats number as a center is better than al’s as a center.
Suck on this...
June 2nd, 2010
1:10 pm
We are not having a problem at power forward but At center so lets fix whats broke not what aint!
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
1:20 pm
RAMON-The Hawks managed to win 53gms and finish 3nd in the East using Zaza as our only backup center. What we need most is a HC with a gm plan and a center, or centers, that can limit the effectiveness of DHoward. I don’t think BHeywood offers the size, strength or versatility to solve that particular problem. Mixing it up with Horford, Zaza, Siler and the European draft pick would work his butt hard.
Don’t get me wrong, if we can sign Heywood, sign him ASAP, but we’d still need another big body, like Siler, for the Shaq’s and Howard’s. Even without JJ, we can be just as good, record wise, as we were last season. With spreading the OFF wealth and relying less on one player, playing consistently better DEF, especially at the PG position, more penetration, and a more involved OFF system, with a commitment to running, will make a tremendous difference.
Having a HC that understands the value of matching up to the opposition, and/or forcing them to match up to us, and who is willing to utilize his resources to make it work, will go a long way towards closing the gap that could be created by JJ’s potential loss.
We might not be as talented without JJ, but we could eventually end up becoming a better team. One more thing to consider. Has anyone considered that JJ might have rejected our initial contract offer because he wanted to see if Woodson would be rehired before making a decision? With the way he ignored and disrespected Woodson, especially down the stretch, and the fact he hasn’t uttered a single word against or about his dismissal, certainly makes you wonder. While money might still be a factor, and if all things are equal and the Hawks make an acceptable offer, with Woodson gone he might resign.
He knows money is an issue with the ASG, and he probably doesn’t want the ASG to think he’ll accept a hometown discount to resign. But, if their offer is in the ballpark with other offers, I can see him resigning. He certainly doesn’t want to be the do all be all for a rebuilding franchise like the Knicks. If he wants to win an NBA title, the Hawks have more talent and have finished higher than any of the teams that will be vying for his services.
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
1:35 pm
SUCK-how many rebounds and blocks per 40 mins do you think Gotat would have accumulated if he’d been required to switch off and defend against PG’s and SG’s on the perimeter? Of course, I’m assuming you actually noticed, or can remember how often teams involved Horford, Zaza and Josh in their pick and rolls in order to create and then take advantage of these favorable match ups.
Can you see, or will you admit, that it’s very difficult for any Center to block shots and protect the basket if they’re above the key switching off on PG’s and SG’s. Horford’s and Smoove’s overall DEF abilities were compromised by Woodson in a futile attempt to hide Bibby’s obvious DEF liabilities. Woodson acknowledged it numerous times.
cp
June 2nd, 2010
1:42 pm
lol great points ray.
O’Brien if I remember correctly they had to cut Marvin’s workout with the Bucks short because he was so out of shape he couldn’t finish it. Honestly this should have been a sign to the Hawks. A guy who is projected to go 1 or 2 in the draft didn’t even care enough to stay in shape. If that isn’t a red flag I don’t know what is..
Rod from CP. I think Marvin is probably the poster child for why guys refuse to workout against other players. A lot of times the agents wont allow them too. I think had Marvin had to compete against somebody 1 on 1 he would have been greatly exposed. A lot of players don’t work out against anybody for this very reason. Marvin would have probably fell down 10 times and had his shot blocked another 10 if he had to work out against somebody.
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
2:01 pm
SUCK-you’ve made a habit of comparing Horford’s stats with other centers, even going as far as misrepresenting the facts in some of those comparisons. If you really think Horford is our problem or weakest link, why don’t you do all of a favor, including yourself, and compare Bibby’s stats to the rest of the NBA’s starting PG’s? Then come back and tell us again how Horford is our weakest link, after showing us how the team has benefited from Bibby’s limited OFF, atrocious DEF, lack of penetrating ability, and inability to create easy scoring opportunities for others.
I’ll repeat an example I and others have presented numerous times, but you’ve conveniently avoided acknowledging or commenting on it. The Denver Nuggets traded Marcus Camby, the DEF player of the yr, who led the NBA in Blocked shots and rebounds. They replace Camby with his backup center, Nene. They also got rid of Allan Iverson, a high scoring, NO DEF PG, and replaced him with CBillups, a solid DEF minded PG.
In the end they became a much better DEF team overall because they had a center who played position DEF, rather than a shot blocker. But most importantly, they had a PG that didn’t allow the opposing PG’s to drive unabated through the lane, or make easy uncontested entry passes into the post.
IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE NBA THERE HASN’T BEEN A CENTER THAT COULD BLOCK SHOTS AND PROTECT THE BASKET WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY DEFENDING AGAINST PG’S AND SG’S ON THE PERIMETER.
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
2:09 pm
JoJo the Godfather,
I like Brandon Bass, and I would have liked to see Atlanta go after him last year ($16 mil over 4 years is not a bad contract).
But my major dislike about your trade, is that Gortat would be the starting center. Sure, he looks good in limited minutes (some of which is against backup players). But if he was to play 34 mpg, I think he would lose some of his effectiveness.
And if I’m trading Josh, I need a better combination than Gortat and Bass, both of who are better suited to be really good backups. Josh still has the potential to be a multiple all star, and a consistent game changer on defense.
Ken S,
Even if JJ leaves, I think with a better coach and a better system, we might play better (less offensive droughts, more ball movement etc.), but in terms of wins, I think losing JJ would set us back 5-10 games.
We would be like the Houston Rockets, who battled every game despite being overmatched and undertalented. But in the end, they won less than 45 games. Which I think is where we would be without JJ.
An Adult
June 2nd, 2010
2:29 pm
HawkKingBibby — first.. how infantile.. get a life!
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
2:33 pm
O’Brien…I wouldn’t want Gortat playing 34 minutes either. I’d like to see our center minutes as 26 out of him (twice what he’s getting now), Pachulia about 12, our 3rd center about 5, and Horford getting about 5 with Bass at the PF (both of these guys on the baseline with the guards driving the lane and dishing to either for a 15 footer which both can knock down).
Patrick
June 2nd, 2010
2:40 pm
It doesn’t make too much sense to talk about bringing in a center unless you are willing to trade either Al or Josh. Josh can’t play the 3, and Atlanta can’t afford to invest too much into a backup player. If you wanted to trade Josh to GS for their first round pick and Biedrins, that’s one thing. Otherwise, the idea of the Hawks spending their full mid-level to bring in Haywood, only to have him ride the bench (and they recently re-upped on Pachulia for a similar figure) makes zero sense.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
2:43 pm
“No big deal since they’ve NEVER had a good center in their franchise history (save a decrepit M.Malone).”
One of my favorite Hawks of all time, one Dikembe Mutombo Mpolondo Mukamba Jean-Jacques Wamutombo, would like to have a finger-wagging word with you my friend.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
2:47 pm
“I will say this though, the biggest mistake I think BK ever made wasn’t in the draft, but it was in trading Rasheed Wallace. ”
The pick the Hawks acquired in the Sheed trade was used on Josh Smith. You keep Sheed and you lose Smoove, who considering his draft position was easily Knight’s best draft pick ever.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
2:52 pm
“Yes regarless of what everyone says about Josh and his jumpshot, he would be a tremendous upgrade over Marvin at the 3. ”
Kobe would have been an upgrade over Slava Medvedenko at power forward, too, but that doesn’t mean he should have played there.
Josh is a PF. That is where he belongs. Yes, Marvin sucks, but if you want to replace him, bring in a better SF. Don’t under-utilize Josh by playing him out of position.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
3:01 pm
“Stats to support my Josh for Gortat & Bass trade.”
Stats can say whatever you want them to say. Trading the #2 DPOY for two backups who barely play is just idiotic. If you want a center so bad that you are willing to take 10 cents on the dollar to get one, just sign and trade Joe Johnson for Eddy Curry.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
3:16 pm
Some of y’all don’t understand the concept of trade value. Even if you want to trade Josh and even if Gortat is the next Sabonis, the fact is you can get a LOT more by trading a guy with Smoove’s skills and reasonable contract than two backups. Smoove is a borderline All-Star caliber player. You should be able to get another borderline All-Star in return for him, not just a guy who may or may not even have what it takes to start in this league.
If you want to trade Smoove for Gortat, they better throw Jameer Nelson in the deal too. I’m not sure I’d even do that, but at least you’re getting a guy who has proven he can start and who fills a need.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
3:17 pm
I hope people realize the Hawks do have the 4/5th best center in the league, so we’re not in need of a STARTING center. And I agree Josh is a better PF than Horford is. Josh can score on the block just as good as Horford can. Josh can rebound as well as Horford can (many of Horford rebounds do come from Josh pressuring the ball). Josh can pass better than Horford. Josh is able to guard more players than Horford. Horford is more efficient from 15 feet, but that’s about all that he does better than Josh.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
3:18 pm
Of course, all of that is irrelevant, since neither team would trade key players like Smoove or Nelson within the division.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
3:22 pm
‘Hatter’ – What’s your preoccupation, obsession, amusement,
recreation, infatuation, anxiety, phobia, fixation,
pastime, & or foretaste with “Suck”?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
3:23 pm
“Otherwise, the idea of the Hawks spending their full mid-level to bring in Haywood, only to have him ride the bench (and they recently re-upped on Pachulia for a similar figure) makes zero sense.”
A guy of Haywood’s caliber could play 25-30 minutes a game as the 3rd big man behind Josh and Al. Those three would split the big man minutes the way Bibby, Joe, and Jamal split the PG/SG minutes this year, and on occasions where the other team has a true center that Horford would have trouble guarding, Haywood could correspondingly play more minutes. That would be well worth the mid level. Yes, it would mean Zaza would be stealing money, but that doesn’t mean the Hawks shouldn’t try to improve the team.
Fundamentals
June 2nd, 2010
3:34 pm
This summer should show us what we’ve got since kids will work hard to impress the new coach and work into the system. I think we’ll see some real progress next season out of a number of players.
We don’t want Joe if he doesn’t want us. If he plans to stay he needs to decide early. Waiting too long on cash will only kill our chances or improving the team by signing folks. Unless he’s willing to sign for what we have left in the end? His decision in my mind depends on the coach, philosophy and outlook moving forward. We have a good core. We should look good moving forward with our without Joe to free agents. He should see that as well. He needs to decide early.
I don’t like getting rid of Smoove or Horford. Marvin needs at least a 1/2 season with a new coach to decide his effectiveness. This summer is his last chance. Right now he’s bench material, but I don’t see giving up on him till you see him in a new system.
Orl won’t part with Gortat, not sure about Bass? Siler might be a project worth trying. I still say Morris didn’t get a fair shot. He needs to be used in a good system. I think he can develop and produce. ZaZa needs real competition to drive him back to excellence. He can be a very servicable backup when he decides to give effort and be a team player. Horford, Siler, Morris and ZaZa would provide good center support or I say use the draft or D-League for a servicable replacement to the Siler option? It’ll be hard to trade ZaZa, stupid to lose Morris at his value.
What about Frye to give us a shooter at the 3/4 spot? He might bulk in the coming years and develop into a solid 4 or maybe 5? He’s young. Dude can shoot it. We need that.
Bass and Mathews are intriguing to me.
Teague needs competition to spur development. Without it he’ll lose confidence and drive. I like Lowry in Houston or Raymond Felton for a guard and or Mathews.
Reddick may be of value as a shooter, how about Matt Barnes as a defender on the perimeter?
There’s alot of action coming up this offseason. I just pray we have vision and effort from our owners and Sund. We need to field a hungry product. I don’t care if they’re the best, just that they give 100% under a new coach and system. Fans can appreciate a team giving their all.
Winning isn’t everything to me. It’s more how they play the game. We had so much promise and talent this year, only to squander it.
Use what you have effectively, no one will hold it against you.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
3:37 pm
Does this make sense?
Shaq – rotation Big: [Josh & Al]
* 18 min per v D.Howard + * Super-Star appeal *
Atl. Mkt. = sells tickets ! (needed Charisma)
locker room presence [good / bad]? * 4 Rings *
@ what $$$ = ??? * immediate relevance !
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
3:38 pm
Oh yeah – Shaq = Unrestricted FA.
Fundamentals
June 2nd, 2010
3:44 pm
Shaq has proven a distraction in his last few stops. He did win in Miami, but has hurt everyone he touches since. We need young, hungry, rising talent. Shaq isn’t the answer to me. Neither is Heywood. I don’t mind the other two big Wizards such as McGee.
cdog
June 2nd, 2010
3:52 pm
NOTICE HOW LONG IT HAS TAKEN RICK SUND TO BRING IN A COACH.TAKING TIME NEVER WON NO CHAMPIONSHIP.HE WANTS SOMEONE TO COME AS A LOSER THE WAY HE IS.THE BEST COACH AVAILABLE IS AVERY JOHNSON.HE WANTS JOHNSON TO STOOP TO HIS LOSING LEVEL.HE’S TRYING TO FIND A WAY TO BRING IN ONE OF HIS BUDDIES INSTEAD OF SOMEONE WHO WANTS TO WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP.YOU WILL SEE SUND AT HIS BEST THIS SEASON, A LOSER, UNLESS HE BRINGS IN JOHNSON AND LET HIM COACH AND MOLD THE HAWKS IN HIS OWN WAY.
cdog
June 2nd, 2010
3:54 pm
BEFORE ITS OVER SUND WILL MAKE THE HAWKS INTO THE WASHINGTON WIZARDS, LOSERS.WATCH AND SEE.
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
4:02 pm
Guys,
The key to remember here, is despite our likes and dislikes, we must also take into account who is available (free agency or trade), and if its free agency, who is available for our price (which will be the mid-level or less).
And I really think JJ is leaving. I don’t see the Hawks offering him the 6 year, $120 mil max (I wouldn’t offer it to him either), and isn’t the money one of the main reasons to stay with your current team? I think the Hawks offer him the 5 year $95 mil max, which is what other teams can offer him.
So why stay with the Hawks when you can make the same money somewhere else, play in a bigger market and be more appreciated, while playing with another big name free agent to help shoulder the load?
I think the only way JJ stays with the Hawks is if :
1) we offer him more money than other teams
2) Wade and LeBron each team up with one of the free agent bigs, leaving JJ out in the cold.
Time to rebuild
June 2nd, 2010
4:04 pm
Best coach available is Mike Woodson…Duh? Sund is clueless and has zero direction. Hes taking his time because no one want to coach under him and recognizes that he wont get the needed resources to win a championship…in addition no body wants to play for the hawks anyway after how they handle mike woodson. Time to rebuild.
i_am_soulstar
June 2nd, 2010
4:07 pm
Grandad,
I don’t think Shaq is the answer at starting center. He plays limited minutes these days, and I think we must consider how a more-talented Cleveland team acquired him the same reasons that we would be acquring him. I’d maybe trade Al or Josh (and that would involve some medium-to-heavy drinking), but definitely not both.
Fundamentals,
I wanna say it’s time to recognize a bad investment and cut our losses with the Marvin Williams thing, but just the possiblity at potential makes me wanna see him under another coach also. I hope curiousity doesn’t kill us.
Time to rebuild
June 2nd, 2010
4:10 pm
Shaq and Al another stupid idea from grandad….
speaking of stupid I think they should put you away for a long long time grandad
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/fbi-dubs-man-who-539321.html
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
4:15 pm
Northcyde ,
Since when is speculating on what Sund could have done “facts?” Every time I’ve done it with Billy Knight, it was called “speculation.” Maybe it’s just different for some folks.
If Woody didn’t have the job security, then imagine how Oklahoma City Thunder head coach Scotty Brooks feels. He won Coach of the Year. His reward? A two-year extension, same as Woody got. I wonder if the fans in Oklahoma City are going to use that as a built in excuse if Brooks begins making mistakes? Here’s a fact- only the very best and most tenured in the business consistently do better. Even then….
We did have a great regular season. We had a mostly crappy postseason. Celebrate one, lament the other. Or pick which one you want to be in denial about (ain’t blogging great).
Hate it or love it, what Sund did had a hand in that great regular season and crappy postseason. He gets as much credit or discredit as Woody did. I really think he hasn’t been around the Hawks long enough to be judged one way or the other just yet. But this summer will change much of that. GMs always like to build things their own way despite what they say publicly. Hell, I wasn’t sure he’d keep Woody around when he first arrived, but he did. Now he gets to start over from the coaching standpoint and if Joe leaves, he will have no choice but to retool this team his own way. Joe is part of Knight’s legacy, not Sund’s. We shall see.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
4:19 pm
cdog:
Phil. is the only one to ‘ahem’ fill their HC pos.
Why is Mr. Sund the only one taking so long?
The others, sans Cleve. were vacant *before* the Hawks.
How big is that dad-gum ax your grindin’ on ol’ Rick.
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
4:19 pm
Time to rebuild/Truth Serum
I don’t hate Woody, and he’s gone so why keep picking on him. But I have a question. Who has been interviewing Woody for coaching job vacancies? I haven’t heard a word, but I figured you would have by now. Oh, and Philly is out, they hired Doug Collins. Who else is after Woody? No wait, I know what it is. Those other coaches that conspired to put Al Horford on the All-star team are all conspiring to keep Woody out of a head coaching job. That has to be it!
Big Ray
June 2nd, 2010
4:24 pm
cdog
I think if Sund wanted to bring in an old buddy, he would have no problems doing it already. As Grandad has already said, only one NBA team has filled their head coach vacancy so far. The others are still not finished, so I guess they are all just as stupid as Sund.
Why are you so sold on Avery Johnson? Just curious. Uh, but would it matter if he brought in Avery? Would not Sund still be the boss? By the way, the day Sund gives a gigantic contract to a selfish player who doesn’t make his teammates better and flashes guns in the locker room is the day Sund can make this team like the Wizards. Until then….
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
4:29 pm
((( Well said Big Ray )))
I think I was speakin’ [writing / typing] *Portuguese
last nite when I was conversing with ‘nc’.
He didn’t seem to understand my point.
(please vava – don’t take exception – it’s my catch phrase)
*I love all Portuguese – especially their beautiful women.
Not Drinking the Kool - Aid
June 2nd, 2010
4:32 pm
Big Ray, O’Brien, Ramon, and Najeh,
You all know how I feel about Marvin. I don’t think you can judge Marvin based on the offense that Woody ran. Marvin did not draft himself nor did he give himself a contract. The Hawks drafted Marvin too high and resigned him at his current contract. I attended or watched about 95% of the games this season. I really felt, at times, the entire team on the court did not know exactly what they were doing. A young player has to be trained to become a better player, thus coaching, thus given a role on the team. Woody’s bird brained schemes, with covering for Bibby by switching, and iso-Joe for most of the shot clock messed up the chemistry of this team. How many of you can hit a jump shot with 1 or 2 seconds on the clock at crunch time when you need a basket as opposed to running in a free flow offense shooting a jumper in rhythm coming off of a screen or from a pass out of the post. It is very difficult for anyone including Marvin. I make no bones that Marvin was drafted too high and is currently over-paid but let’s at least see if a new coach running a real offensive and defensive NBA pro style scheme can get more out of these guys, especially Marvin. Also did you think that maybe Rick Sund was trying to accomodate the wishes of his coach in resigning Marvin, Bibby, Zsa Zsa, and bringing in J. Crawford? I am not blaming or excusing Sund just need to see more of his work to make a call on him. I again state the Hawks are best as a running team, they need an athletic, banging, running, shot – blocking big man maybe draft Dexter Pittman or bring in a young big man like Johan Petro or Ian Mahnimini. The Hawks abused the Celtics by running them off the court. The next coach should run, run and run some more. I also think the Hawks want to bring Josh Childress back because Josh C. is not a great offensive player but a defensive and hustle player with basketball smarts. Perfect in Marvin’s spot where you don’t need a play ran for you. Just one man’s opinion!
Fundamentals
June 2nd, 2010
4:35 pm
Woodson must be as sorry as Brown from Cleveland? No one has hired a coach? Recently fired ones aren’t even really in the mix. Too soon. I’m not sold Avery is the one for us. I liked Byron Scott or Sam Mitchell if we’re going with an established coach.
I still say Ty Corbin would be a great look.
Not sold on Jackson, but I’d accept him.
Drew or Casey would also be acceptable to me.
Whatever happens, fans and players must embrace the new coach and new system or we’re hopeless!
Fundamentals
June 2nd, 2010
4:40 pm
Kool Aid Man,
I agree on your comments about Marvin & Chemistry. We need a solid philosophy and offensive set before we decide on Marvin’s value. We’ve got a number of awesome pieces that need some serious work and evaluation this summer. Their work this summer will decide whether they fit into our system by Feb. I’d like to see us draft the best player available and fill our roster with young, hungry players. There are not free agent gems to be had. We’re really just kidding ourselves.
If the pieces we have with or without Joe work hard, we can still make some noise. A few key signings and we’ll be right back in the mix. It’s all about philosophy, work ethic and chemistry. All things you can’t buy, but you can buy into them!
t-height
June 2nd, 2010
4:46 pm
I don’t consider Frye, Wilcox, and Kritic as centers and Theo is a no no as well. Shaq or Ben Wallace would be great pick ups if they would come here to Atlanta in an Avery Johnson system. The hawks don’t need a center to score, they need a defensive or big bodied center who can rebound.
Fundamentals
June 2nd, 2010
4:54 pm
Shaq and Ben are too old and destructive to chemistry. Frye is a good shooter – good SF/PF but not C. Wilcox is a problem, Kristic I’m not buying.
We do need a solid defensive, big bodied rebounding center, but Shaq or Wallace are not it. I’d rather risk time with Siler.
ATLborn
June 2nd, 2010
5:07 pm
Tyson Chandler has a player option this year. If he opts out we should go after him. He’s a tall body that defends very well in the paint.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
5:16 pm
Not Drinking the Kool – Aid & Fundamentals:
1st of all – NDtK-A – I absolutely agree about Marv
& have said so on this board, we shall be castigated
for our efforts. I could care less.
I have said on more than one occasion Marv is “NOT”
a [3] but a stretch [4] or a high post [5] even.
He should be in the [a] rotation with J & A. Also his
lower body strength + length & lack of agility lends itself
to defending [4's] & [5's]. Our young *trio would have been
well suited for the triangle. *(J + A + Marv)
However, having said all that…look for him to be traded.
If one were certain he would flourish under a new regime
then allowing him to re-eatablish trade value would be
the best for all.
Fundamentals – though I rarely disagree with your positions,
I must on this (1) issue.
“There are *not* free agent gems to be had.” [asterisk added]
W/O listing them all…there are some nice ones for the picking:
Two for right now;
* Amir Johnson – un-restricted
* Kyle Lowry – restricted
I’ll make cases for both & others later.
O'Brien
June 2nd, 2010
5:18 pm
Ray,
Northcyde fails to acknowledge that a part of Woody’s job description is player development. And it doesnt matter what industry you work in. You have to find the balance between short term goals and long term goals, because they are both important.
Not Drinking the Kool-Aid,
I agree to some extent on Marvin. he was unsure of his role, and I dont think Woody did a good job developing/utilizing him.
That being said, a big part of the problem is on Marvin. What’s causing him to fumble and stumble so much? What’s causing him to miss open shots? Whats causing him to get his shots blocked by shorter players.
Hopefully, a new coach with a new offensive system and player accountability will have a positive effect on Marvin. I can understand giving Marvin one more season to see if he can turn it around. But dont be surprised if we are still having this discussion next offseason.
Sautee
June 2nd, 2010
5:25 pm
Truth-serum,
I’d have to say that the Head Coaches of the league, who named Al Horford an All-Star certainly thought his defense was acceptable. Heh heh.
But maybe you know more than THEY do? Tell me, T-s, do you REALLY think the coaches are that out of touch? Can you explain that conspiracy theory one more time?
On another note, I’m still wondering how Dwight Howard’s league leading blocked shots didn’t make Orlando the Champs?
I also noticed that you never responded to my post weeks ago about the last two Champions. Boston in 08 had it’s starting frontcourt average 1.83 blocks per game for the Finals. LA in 09 had it’s frontcourt average 2.4 blocks per game. Both of these figures are less than Dwight Howard averages in a game alone.
And yet they were champs. Not the shot blocking Magic.
Maybe shot blocking is only a small part of Championship defense, eh?
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
5:26 pm
I would be for signing Shaq for a 2 year $7-$8 million a year deal, even as much as $9 million. Shaq immediately causes ticket sales to go up by 10%. And you think JJ wouldn’t get the best open look shots that he’s gotten his entire career with Shaq? Shaq wasn’t the reason the Cavs lost. I’d be all for adding Shaq.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
5:41 pm
Najeh…in regards to trade value, surely you don’t believe that a near all-star PF is of equal value to a near all-star PG or C. Those two positions carry way more value. Under your theory, you should be able to trade Josh for Russel Westbrook, Rajon Rondo, or Brook Lopez. That’s not going to happen. A near all-star PF will only get you potential or a has-been at PG & C.
with that being said, i don’t really want to trade josh for gortat & bass. i just proposed it for all those that say we need a true center at any cost. i want the hawks to continue to add athletic/versatile players. its a small-budget team’s best chance at competing. if we get lucky in the draft and/or teague turns out to be a star, we’ll be fine. bring joe & chill back and add from the draft and young/cheap free agents.
Matt the Brave
June 2nd, 2010
5:53 pm
Man I would love Shaq. If it were 3 years ago.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
5:54 pm
Thanks, blog, for eating my long-azz post.
sam'l
June 2nd, 2010
5:59 pm
The Hawks are about 1 good move away from being the winners we suspect they are……A dominant center. Any coach who can glue this team together, motivate, keep them from disintegrating mentally will be accepted.
How do teams get dominating centers?
Is it possible to trade up for a high draft pick? Everyone outiside of Joe, Al, Jamaal and Josh can go. (However, it is possible that when you ship out the Duck, he will suddenly blossom and continue to kill you)
Does Sund have any “friends” around the league willing to trade someone like Gasol or Garnett in a sweetheart deal? Or maybe a forced financial deal?
Does someone really like the city of cultural and intellectual attractions in Atlanta to demand a trade here?
Could we just make Bibby an assistant coach and convince him to leave the court in preparation for his new career?
I still don’t know what caused Bibby’s steep decline and Marvin’s disappearance. Has anyone in this 7th (?) largest media market in the country ever thought of asking them what happened? I mean, they’re still here! The problem didn’t just go away.
Don’t get me started. MC–turn your head…you’re exempt. But when you listen to Steve Holman (sp?),on the air, Ryan Cameron in the arena, the idiotic owner squabble you have to wonder at the intelligence level involved. (I was going to add Charles Barkley, but he sometimes will come out and tell the truth about a situation which makes him rare).
There is the lack of a coherent bond between this team, the media, and us….which leaves us in the dark and mostly flailing around for answers. .
Is Sund really keeping his options secret…I hope so….I hope he’s up every night pouring over every newspaper and blog in the country, listening to every Internet sports show looking for that malcontent who is healthy who wants desperately to get out of his situation. (Steve Jackson comes to mind).
Who is calling out Phil Jackson? That idiot who went into the stands to beat up a fan just made a series-saving play for the Lakers (grabbing a Kobe airball and shoveling it back in to keep Phoenix from going up). Ron Artest the disgraced gangsta of the NBA…now a bonafide hero and winner. Under the right influence. Phil Jackson, who now can concentrate on Kobe playing offense.
You know the Hawks probably could have gotten Artest somewhere along the way. Any team could have……but they wouldn’t have known what to do with him….
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
6:02 pm
“Najeh…in regards to trade value, surely you don’t believe that a near all-star PF is of equal value to a near all-star PG or C.”
Maybe not, but a near all-star PF is of much closer value to a near all-star PG or C than he is to a backup C and a backup PF. (I’ll disregard for now that Rondo and Westbrook are farther up the PG rankings than Smoove is on the PF rankings.) Marcin Gortat has put up his entire career’s worth of stats against opposing teams’ backups. There is no guarantee that he would be good if he became a starter or played starters’ minutes; in fact, the history of the NBA is littered with bad contracts given to good backups who sucked as starters. I’m not opposed to acquiring a guy like that in exchange for correspondingly scrubby players and seeing what he’s got. But I am undeniably opposed to trading a near all-star PF, one of the league’s elite defenders, one of the league’s elite passers among big men, for a guy who is a lot closer to Jon Koncak at this point in his career than a legit contributor.
By the way, if PGs and Cs are by rule more valuable, are you saying the Magic wouldn’t trade Dwight Howard for LeBron James? After all, small forward is the most easily replaceable position in the league…
Valuing one position over another is OK to a point, but the line has to be drawn somewhere, beyond which you just pick the better player.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
6:07 pm
*Grandad’s Trade of the Day* |6/2/10| (edition)
Memphis gets:
* Jamal Crawford
* Jeff Teague
Hawks get:
O.J. Mayo
Hasheem Thabeet
Memphis motivation;
They need / want a point guard. They are not happy with
‘Conley’. Although, I’m not exactly sure why?
This is based on an “interview” I read, – ‘Lionel Hollins’.
Hawks motivation – OJ Mayo – ’nuff said.
Works on NBA trade machine:
With Thabeet or Conley, either one.
I tried to give Marv away but they don’t have filler.
They have Marko Jaric’s contract but trade machine didn’t
have it available. It also does not have a way to include
Childress in a S&T.
I think Jamal, Teague & Childress might get
Mayo & DeMarre Carroll but ins & outs of (CBA)
would have to be traversed.
Jody
June 2nd, 2010
6:10 pm
I do believe that the Celtics did some (not alot) of switching on defense against the Magic, yet they didn’t get outrebounded the way the Hawks did. The Hawks did not literally switch on every defensive possession they played this season. So, to blame the poor rebounding and overall interior defense on that is silly. The fact remains that the frontline is undersized and that has been a problem for this team the last three years in the playoffs, not to mention regular season. Hence, the Hawks are looking for a center(s). And they need quality, not just any old stiff.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
6:16 pm
If we gave up Teague, Immediately Ray Felton
jumps into FA conversation / Kyle Lowry as well.
Plus Sherron Collins jumps into draft conversations.
If Joe stays & we were to acquire Mayo then a two guard
back-court both with playmaking skills becomes an option.
Think (86 Celtics) DJ & Ainge.
Joe would have his *wingman*.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
6:19 pm
*G-dad’s T.o.t.D. – I forgot to say – BASH AWAY !
Jody
June 2nd, 2010
6:20 pm
http://www.hawksquawk.net/community/index.php/topic/347620-peachtree-hoops-its-come-to-this-another-links-post-al-horfords-wish-list/
So, if Al wants to move to power forward, do the Hawks just ignore his request? I don’t think that would be a good idea.
Sautee
June 2nd, 2010
6:22 pm
Grandad,
So who would play PG, Bibby?
Sorry, but if we give up Teague, we have to have Conley back. Or at LEAST Marcus Williams as a throw-in.
Additionally, I’d guess that Memphis would think that Mayo’s upside would trump Crawford’s present talent level. Also Mayo is 22 and Jamal 30.
Plus, you almost NEVER see a team trade a promising player on a rookie contract. It’s poor asset management.
Keep trying, though. We need distraction right now.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
6:22 pm
Najeh…the answer to your dwight/lebron trade is that neither team does the trade. it hardly ever happens. teams don’t swap all stars. teams will not give you equal, proven value for josh smith. you can either take a payer near the end of his career, or you can take a couple of cheaper players with upside. again, i’m not saying you make this trade, but there is equal value in it. all 3 players are paid equal to their abilities. you can’t prove that gortat will not be a solid starter and you can’t prove that he will until he gets the opportunity. if he was a proven starter at center already, then he wouldn’t be available for trade. the only centers that i see available for trade that are currently starting are dampier, possibly bynum, chandler, krstic, jefferson, okafor, hawes & dalembert. all of these guys but 2 make over $10M next year. would you rather have one of them or a 26 yr old with solid per-minute stats and a reasonable contract for the next 4 years?
ryan
June 2nd, 2010
6:32 pm
I think the Hawks will try and push for a top free agent it won’t be LeBron even if there over the cap they are going to have a sign and trade. Two players the Hawks have there eye on is Amare Stoudamire and D. Wade. Josh Smith is the best player that the spirit group can put on the block in a sign and trade also if Josh Chidress comes back.
Time to rebuild
June 2nd, 2010
6:47 pm
TRUTH-SERUMS TRADE OF THE DAY….MIKE CON AND HAM AND BIG RAY FOR MARK BRADLEY OR JEFF SCHULTZ!
The Flash
June 2nd, 2010
6:48 pm
The Hawks biggest problem this off season is JJ. Why? Cause I don’t think anyone else is going to want him for big money, and I think that that puts the Hawks, aka Gearon, in a bind. How do you not resign if you can a guy who you started WWIII over and who delivered, even though it was not like you thought (anybody forget that JJ was going to be the answer at the point.
Reading the column about the salary cap issues that letting JJ go further complicates matters, although I do not think that any team out there will pay him no 15 big ones like the Hawks have been to occupy the ball the way this dude needs to.
So, Gearon can try to keep JJ but bust his salary down to real value, but how does that work? The guy has an All Star year and you cut his salary and expect that he will not be poison out there and in the locker room.
Nope. I think that Gearon has to keep paying JJ, which means that this team will have no half-court offense worth talking about, which you need if you want to be taken seriously during serious times. So, things have come full circle for Gearon. He got what he wanted with that phony crisis over JJ’s acquisition by insisting that he had to pay way too much (the picks, my friends, the picks), and now is stuck with continuing to pay way too much to keep a guy I have to believe he’d love to get rid of but might not be able to.
In the meantime, while you guys are winning games, you’re gettin no love because there is something that is lacking in this franchise. It lacks character, style, a quality that can and does only come from the top. Here, the top is what it is, and youz guys who were around back in the day don’t need me to remind you what I think that is. If I am right yet again, and I think I might well be, you’ll be reminded often enough without me needing to say another word.
A shout out to my crew, the only one of whom I have noticed is still kickin it would be Mr. Ray. No Doc, No Astro, No Andoman, No Thinkingman. What, they were all Belkin? Later.
Time to rebuild
June 2nd, 2010
6:50 pm
AMARE
JOSH
JJ(HE CAN PLAY THE 3)
CRAWFORD
TEAGUE
GOTAT
JOE SMITH
MOE EVANS
FLIP MURRY
BIBBY
Sautee
June 2nd, 2010
6:51 pm
Sorry Truth-serum, but Mike is still on his rookie contract. Poor asset management to trade him.
cdog
June 2nd, 2010
6:53 pm
big ray, granddad, just because other teams hasn’t hired a coach, does that mean that rick sund should wait on them? no. he is suppose to be working to make the hawks better.thats what’s been wrong with atlanta sports teams over the years.they wait on other teams to make moves instead of doing it themselves.atlanta usually ends up getting the pick of the litter.yes, i’m sold on avery johnson because he is a proven winner.he is what the hawks need now that woodson is gone.he is versitle. a player like marvin williams and josh smith would really shine in his system. also, he has videos out that proves his knowledge of the game.you all are not knowledgeable basketball people.you are going off of personal feelings the same as sund.yes,if sund keeps sitting around with a cell phone stuck in his ear and do nothing, the hawks will be the same kind of team the wizards are, losers.he need to bring johnson in, get out of his way, and let the team play.you will see winning results with avery johnson
Ken Strickland
June 2nd, 2010
6:54 pm
Almost everyone seems to want to make an issue of Marvins weaknesses. Well, he’s proven he can score, since he’s averaged 14.8PPG and 6.3RPG already. I think he can duplicate, or even exceed those figures if he’s included, rather than excluded in the OFF, and isn’t forced to play ISO and get his points trying beat someone off the dribble, or create his own shot. He can also get more rebounds if he’s not always clearing out so someone can go ISO, or constantly switching out on the perimeter and away from the basket.
Rip Hamilton became an Allstar with the Pistons, and he definitely wouldn’t have become an Allstar with them based on his ability to pass, create his own shot, dribble, or take anyone off the dribble. You create an OFF system that puts Marvin in a position to take advantage of what he does best, and that’s shoot and draw fouls. You don’t force him, or anyone else for that matter, to try and score by playing to their weaknesses.
C DHoward is an outstanding athlete, and the NBA’s most dominant center, but it would be absolutely STUPID to force him to score like DNowitzki.
Sautee
June 2nd, 2010
6:56 pm
Flash,
Long time, man. Good to see you’re still around.
A lot of us old timers are still kicking over on the fan blog. Ray is the moderator.
Check it out at: http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-hawks-blog/2010/05/27/hawks-fans-summer-speculation/
Time to rebuild
June 2nd, 2010
6:56 pm
ITTY, BITTY, HEY RAY, NO COACH HAS BEEN HIRED AS OF YET AND INTERVIEW ARE JUST TOKEN AT THIS POINT.
WOODSON IS ON VACATION.
THERE WILL COME A TIME WHEN THE FIRST COACH IS HIRED AND THEN IT WILL START A CHAIN REACTION.
WOODSON IS A RISING STAR..AND HAS A LONG CAREER AHEAD OF HIM. IT DOESNT MATTER IF HE COMES BACK NEXT YEAR OR THE YEAR AFTER…HE WILL BE A HEAD COACH AGAIN AND WONT HAVE TO SIT OUT AS LONG AS AVERY DID OR IS….
WHAT GOES ON IN BIG RAYS HEAD…….WOODSON IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WORLD’S POVERTY…
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
7:09 pm
“Memphis gets:
* Jamal Crawford
* Jeff Teague
Hawks get:
O.J. Mayo
Hasheem Thabeet”
With Rudy Gay possibly leaving and Zach Randolph possibly going to jail, I don’t think there’s any way the Grizzlies part with Mayo.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
7:13 pm
“Almost everyone seems to want to make an issue of Marvins weaknesses. Well, he’s proven he can score, since he’s averaged 14.8PPG and 6.3RPG already. ”
He did that in the same Woody isolation offense in which he barely averaged 10 points per game this year. Why did he regress?
You can blame Woody for a lot of things, but there’s a lot Marvin can do better than he currently does. I wrote a pretty long post about this that got swallowed up by the blog monster, so I’m not going to repeat all of it, but if Marvin focused on just making open 3’s and playing lock down defense this year, he would have been a major asset. Neither of those things require coaching.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
7:18 pm
“I think that Gearon has to keep paying JJ, which means that this team will have no half-court offense worth talking about, which you need if you want to be taken seriously during serious times. ”
Having Joe doesn’t automatically mean there’s no half court offense. Joe proved in Phoenix that he can thrive in a system where he doesn’t hog the ball. The ball-hoggery was by Woody’s design. Joe is fully capable of playing and thriving in a system designed around Teague running pick and rolls with Smoove and pick and pops with Horford.
It’s on the next coach to make this happen — let Teague play a Tony Parker/Rajon Rondo type of role, let Smoove and Horford anchor your post offense, and allow Joe to play a role similar to Manu Ginobili, Ray Allen, and Paul Pierce — all players who can put up big time scoring numbers, but none of whom hog the ball in their respective offenses.
Pierce, in particular, is a good example of this — during the years when the Celtics were centered around him and Antoine Walker, he used to be a notorious ball hog, but with the emergence of Rondo and the acquisition of Garnett and Allen, he doesn’t hog the ball nearly as much but is still effective.
doc
June 2nd, 2010
7:20 pm
flash, still looking at you and if you had followed any of the blog for the last three years you would know you are singing to the chorus. the most recent has been his expecting fans to come out and our assistant gm saying there are no worthy picks at 24 unless he want sot work hard. no frigging accountability from the top down.
how you doing man, got the feldenkreis down yet?
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
7:30 pm
cdog – I don’t want to be 1st just to be 1st.
I want Mr. Sund to be right rather than 1st.
Actually Avery Johnson is [my] 1st choice @ this point.
So – in that regard, we are on the same page.
Plus, [and] I don’t really have an answer as to why,
but I do not particularly care for Casey.
However, when all is said and done, I support Mr. Sund.
He has given me “NO” reason “NOT” to support him.
And by the way…who cares if Avery has a tape.
I’ll make a tape.
Then if I apply, would you support me as a candidate.
If Mr. Sund hires Av Johnson then will you then reverse
your position as a Sund-cynic.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
7:31 pm
“the answer to your dwight/lebron trade is that neither team does the trade. it hardly ever happens. teams don’t swap all stars.”
I know they won’t in real life. It’s a hypothetical question based on your statement that PGs and Cs won’t be traded for equally good players at other positions. I’m asking whether you would decline a Howard-for-LeBron trade if you were the Magic GM.
“teams will not give you equal, proven value for josh smith. you can either take a payer near the end of his career, or you can take a couple of cheaper players with upside. ”
Then you shouldn’t trade him. There are two reasons to make a trade — either you get an equally good player/players who fit your system better, or you clear salary cap space to rebuild/make a run at a free agent. Your trade does neither.
Anyway, I don’t see how you come to the conclusion that a 24-year-old borderline All-Star player who presumably hasn’t reached his peak yet and gets paid a very reasonable contract will only get unproven, unproductive, or washed up players in return.
“you can’t prove that gortat will not be a solid starter and you can’t prove that he will until he gets the opportunity. ”
You can, however, prove that Josh Smith will be a Defensive Player of the Year candidate and borderline All-Star. Why trade a proven commodity for a very, very unproven one?
“would you rather have one of them or a 26 yr old with solid per-minute stats and a reasonable contract for the next 4 years?”
The Hawks have already been down this road, when they signed a 20-year-old center with very similar per-minute stats to Gortat to be their starting center for a reasonable, 4 year contract.
His name is Zaza Pachulia.
For the record, Zaza is only a week older than Gortat, and both this past season and over their careers their per-minute stats are very similar. Gortat blocks more shots and shoots a higher percentage (a lot of that is because he gets more dunks since he plays with a better point guard), while Zaza gets more dimes and more steals. But both rebound at the same rate and are very, very similar per-minute players.
If you think trading the #2 DPOY for Zaza 2.0 is a good trade just because Zaza 2.0 plays center, then I don’t know what else to tell you.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
7:38 pm
For all the talk of how Horford is not a center, there are two centers in the league who cause him problems — Howard and the Shaq/Ilgauskas combo. Horford at least holds his own against every other center in the league, including Brook Lopez, Andrew Bogut, Andrew Bynum, Brendan Haywood, as well as the pseudo-centers like Bosh and Amare that so many people on this blog have a hard-on for. Blowing up an otherwise very productive front court because two teams in the league give the Hawks problems is an idiotic idea.
The Hawks need a physical, strong, 25-30 minute defensive center who will come in and give Horford a breather. That’s it. No need to trade either Smoove or Horford, unless they receive an equally good or better player in return.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
7:41 pm
On another note, we all remember how Billy Knight picked Acie Law against Woody’s wishes, Woody never warmed up to playing Acie, and that draft pick ended up getting wasted. Knowing this, wouldn’t it make sense to have a coach in place before the draft so that he is involved in the process of picking a player? Why draft a guy and then bring in a coach whose system might not allow that player to be a good fit?
Siler Maybe?
June 2nd, 2010
7:54 pm
The Hawks should have kept that Garret Siler kid….he may have needed some time to get better but come on you signed Jason Collins just to sit on the bench…..I dont think they should have let him go and I wonder if he is available? Young kid with that kind of size probably could have helped against Howard
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
7:56 pm
Sautee:
What you have to understand is my motivation.
G-dad’s trade’s don’t alway’s reflect my personal
views. His trades are to provoke thought & discussion.
Also he absolutely tries to apply logic into each trade
from both teams viewpoints. Hence the darn trade machine.
We’ve all had enough:
What about Zaza & Bibby – for – D.Wade?
In reality I was trying to figure out who this *Lagree fella
was talkin’ about when he said Atl. would pkg. Marv & Jamal
to acquire a wingman for Joe. (Robin to Joe’s Batman)
He mentioned a star quality player – so I started trying to
figure who they would bring.
Trade machine tied my hands.
I’m also thinking a pkg of Jamal, Marv, Childress [S&T],*(Teague)
would acquire Mayo + ________?
*Teague would not be my 1st choice* to trade away.
I began to study Mayo’s stats & read about him.
He is impressive.
If we lose Joe – he is the kind of player who would
soften the blow & help fill the void.
He’s not a one dimensional player.
So…after all that…yes, Ill keep tryin’.
Sautee
June 2nd, 2010
8:05 pm
Najeh,
Co-sign your 7:38 post. Big Time.
Grandad,
If YOU were Memphis, would YOU trade Mayo?
robdawg08
June 2nd, 2010
8:25 pm
Marvin Williams was a stupid pick to start with. He was the 6th man in college with N.C.
How can you pass on a point guard like Chris Paul ? Billy Knight should have resigned the next day after the draft.
No top center = no deep playoff run. Bank on that Homey The Clown !
tyger
June 2nd, 2010
8:27 pm
Rand MO:
As a senior for Atlanta, Georgia’s Landmark Christian High School, Morris averaged almost a triple-double at 23.0 ppg, 16.0 rpg and 8.0 bpg, earning him McDonald’s All-American Team status. Randolph Morris was the #2 rated center and #10 overall prospect by Rivals.com in a year when a record eight high schoolers went directly to the NBA draft.
If he were eligible today, he would be a top 10 pick based on high school alone.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
8:58 pm
On a non-basketball related note, don’t know how many of y’all saw this Detroit Tigers pitcher get robbed by the umpire of a perfect game on the final play of the game. That’s gotta be one of the craziest things happen in any sport that I’ve ever seen.
cdog
June 2nd, 2010
9:12 pm
granddad, to answer your question, no. sund has shown his true nature as a GM.he’s terrible.he has blown 2 years in which he could have improve the team to get past the cavs,majic, and celtics in a playoff series.he did nothing, then turn around and blamed a coach who won won 53 games with short handed personnel compared to those teams and fired him unneccesarily.he sit back while cleveland acquired shaq, then had a chance to get stackhouse but let orlando get him.he could have been a big help to the hawks better than to the majic.he did bring in CRAWFORD BUT HE KNEW IT TOOK MORE THAN JUST A 2 GUARD TO GET PAST THOSE BIG 3 BUT HE WAS MORE CONCERN WITH SAVING MONEY THAN WINNING A CHAMPIONSHIP.sund just isn’t a basketball person. ANY GM WHO MAKES A STATEMENT, “YOU DON’T TRADE FOR SUPERSTARS, YOU DRAFT THEM”, CAN’T BE ALL THERE.he does not have the guts of a danny ainge or the good gms in the league.also, no i would not hire you if you made a tape.no one would learn any thing from yours.the way you judge basketball now supports that. you have to know the game and be real about it.not see things blindly because of personal feelings .
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
9:19 pm
Najeh…nice try saying gortat is zaza 2.0. they’re not even close to the same type of player. zaza’s never had a fg% over 50%. zaza’s never been known as a shotblocker. zaza’s only had a rebound rate per 40 over 11 once. gortat has a career (3 yrs) fg% of 54%. he’s never avgd less than 12.5 rebs per 40 minutes. he won the german cup 3 years, and led the 2009 european championships in rebounds. he’s known as a rebounder and defender. zaza is known as more of an offensive center….and besides, you’re forgetting the trade was for bass and gortat and it saves us $1.5M in salaries this year.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
9:22 pm
we could have orlando throw in the rights to fran vazquez as well.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
9:24 pm
Grandad I would be for that trade! I really don’t see how anyone wouldn’t.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
9:40 pm
“Najeh…nice try saying gortat is zaza 2.0. they’re not even close to the same type of player. ”
You completely missed the point. The point is you can’t just see that a guy blocks a shot and gets 4 boards in 12 minutes and assume he’s going to block 3 shots and get 12 boards if he plays 36 minutes. If that was the case, based on his per minute stats as a backup in Milwaukee, Zaza would have been among the league leaders in rebounding and would have contended for an All-Star spot in Atlanta. Like I said before, Gortat’s numbers come against second string players and most of his shots are dunks set up by his superior teammates.
Taking a chance on a guy like that is fine if you give up nothing to get him. If you are giving up the #2 DPOY to get him, it’s lunacy.
And I’m not including Brandon Bass in this discussion because undersized PFs who get boards are a dime a dozen, and most of them don’t require paying them $12 million over the next three years.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
9:52 pm
“If that was the case, based on his per minute stats as a backup in Milwaukee, Zaza would have been among the league leaders in rebounding and would have contended for an All-Star spot in Atlanta.”
No, based on his number in Milwaukee, he would avg 12 pts and 18 rebs in a 36 minute game. The next year in Atlanta, he averaged 12 pts and 8 rebs in 31 minutes a game. So not far off from his stats.
“And I’m not including Brandon Bass in this discussion because undersized PFs who get boards are a dime a dozen, and most of them don’t require paying them $12 million over the next three years.”
Please name 3 that are available to the Hawks that can shoot 50%+ from the floor, 80%+ from the line, and rebound at the rate Bass can.
JoJo the Godfather
June 2nd, 2010
9:54 pm
That should read avg 12 pts and 10 rebs in a 36 minute game (for ZaZa).
Najeh Davenpoop
June 2nd, 2010
10:15 pm
“Please name 3 that are available to the Hawks that can shoot 50%+ from the floor, 80%+ from the line, and rebound at the rate Bass can.”
Sure. Udonis Haslem. Glen Davis. DeJuan Blair. Leon Powe. Tyler Hansbrough. Taj Gibson. Drew Gooden. I could go on but I’m too lazy. I’m sure one or two of them may not meet all your criteria, but at the rate at which undersized PFs off the bench put up shots and free throws, that’s a difference of less than a point and less than a rebound per game. I think it’s pretty telling that on a team that was getting out-physicaled against Boston, Bass still didn’t managed to get any playing time.
Anyway, all this is beside the point. The point is that trading 16 points 8 boards, top 20 in the league in blocks and steals, top 3 help defender in the league, top 10 passer among NBA big men, #2 in DPOY for the possibility of 10 points, 10 boards, and 2 blocks at center and an interchangeable undersized backup PF is foolish.
By the way, Gortat averages $6.5 million over the course of his contract, which runs for another 4 years. Along with Bass’ deal, that totals $10.5 million a year for two backup players, neither of whom has proven they can be a viable starter. In what universe is that a better investment than $11 million a year for a guy with Josh’s credentials?
northcyde
June 2nd, 2010
10:25 pm
O’Brien
June 2nd, 2010
5:18 pm
Ray,
Northcyde fails to acknowledge that a part of Woody’s job description is player development. And it doesnt matter what industry you work in. You have to find the balance between short term goals and long term goals, because they are both important.
Not Drinking the Kool-Aid,
I agree to some extent on Marvin. he was unsure of his role, and I dont think Woody did a good job developing/utilizing him.
That being said, a big part of the problem is on Marvin. What’s causing him to fumble and stumble so much? What’s causing him to miss open shots? Whats causing him to get his shots blocked by shorter players.
Hopefully, a new coach with a new offensive system and player accountability will have a positive effect on Marvin. I can understand giving Marvin one more season to see if he can turn it around. But dont be surprised if we are still having this discussion next offseason.
******************
Oh I understand it O’Brien. I also understand that the two players that turned into stars for us ( JJ and Smoove ), Woody gets absolutely no credit for their development. Add Horford to that list as well. But people want to focus on the scrubs who didn’t develop ( and didn’t develop under anybody else either ), as proof that he doesn’t develop players.
Teague’s non-development was an easy call. The dude couldn’t shoot nor finish in traffic,and you had 2 veteran guards that you could play in front of him at the point. He could’ve played the dude more. No doubt on that. But with Teague’s obvious deficiencies as a player right now, it may have been to the detriment to the team. So it’s easy for a coach to play it safe, and play the 2 vet guards.
As for Marvin, the excuses need to stop for him as well. If he made some damn open shots, he would’ve gotten more opportunities. JJ’s assists dropping down below 5 was a direct result of Marvin and Bibby not making shots when he passed them the ball. But mainly Marvin.
It’s like Rod says about Marvin . . the dude is wide open on most plays in which teams go to double JJ. When he gets open looks, he HAS to knock them down. If he misses, he’s not going to get the ball.
People talk about ball movement. But what good is ball movement, if guys can’t do basic things to score the basketball? The purpose of ball movement is to get the best possible shot, whether that’s a lay-up or a wide open jumper. If guys get the ball in scoring position . . . score the basketball.
It’s like you said. We can install a new offensive system in here. But it still means that these players need to make wide open shots and make lay-ups ( sometimes tough lay-ups ). We’ll see what happens next year with the new “system”. A new “system” was supposed to help Philadelphia’s offensive woes too ( Eddie Jordan’s “Princeton Offense” ). Philly’s offense was slightly worse this year, than it was last year.
So much for the “system”. How about players making some shots?
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
10:25 pm
tyger:
Randolph Morris avg. a triple double @ a single A school
qualifies him for what?
I’ve nothing against R.M. but single A HS stats have no meaning.
Before you get angry – I actually think the young man has
some potential offensivly.
rusty
June 2nd, 2010
10:31 pm
northcyde
your posts ramble on & don make much sense. all year long you knock jc & claim how great jj is. jc played much better than your hero jj did. he choked & plaed like crap. his iso play wil never make this team play like it should which is better ball movement & an up tempo play. you knocked teague all season & praised bibby. teague never had a chance to show what he could do. everybody knows that he is super fast,can stay in front of the fastest guards in the nba & can penerate. we have to completely take the ball out of jj hands as we dribbles way to much & forces bad shots. as for our defense who knows what hell we can do or not do based on woodys stupid switching defense. i know that our bench was not strong but we also dont have any idea on anyone as woody stupidly refused to play anyone. i was always suprised at the huge minutes he gaved to mb & mw.often he gave mw more minutes than he gave to js. we need to get rid of mw,mb & moe. we need to get rid of
jj as this team will always be playing iso joe. this is the only way joe can be effective. he certainly is not worth the huge salery he is demanding
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
10:49 pm
cdog – I was joshin’ about the video.
*However, when my book comes out I’ll give you a copy for free.
**Serious**
“then had a chance to get stackhouse but let orlando get him”
*I thought ‘Stack’ went to the “Deer”.
“HE WAS MORE CONCERN WITH SAVING MONEY”
*Perhaps ownership has him on a tight budget?
“if you made a tape.no one would learn any thing from yours.
the way you judge basketball now supports that.”
*You might be surprised.
“you have to know the game”
*I challenge you to a game of “basketball chess”. >Your move.
“and be real about it.not see things blindly
because of personal feelings.”
*That puzzles me most of all.
**I look at B-ball from a logical point of view.
***I’m a Hawks fan…beyond that I’m a pragmatist.
Remember – I’m with you on Avery.
Rick Sund
June 2nd, 2010
10:59 pm
Expect a coaching hire in about 2 months.
We are still separating the “emotional” from the “analytical.” Despite my statements that the Magic blowouts didn’t matter because so many other teams got blown out in the playoffs, we are still suffering from this blowout series. I know, that as myself, a TRUE COMPETITOR, this series really stung.
Rick
P.S. I am REALLY leaning towards getting Casey. He is CLEARLY more experienced than Avery and knows more about the game than Mark Jackson, even though MJ is 2nd all time in Assists
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
11:05 pm
northcyde:
I know I pick @ you alot but the ball movement query above
got my attn. It’s not just ball mov. but player mov. as well.
It displaces the defense. Also it forces the defense to
play both sides of the floor. Another item is players being
able to catch & shoot in rhythm.
I agree players need to make shots but a coach needs to put
each player in the best position to be successful, along with
designing plays that address that objective.
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
11:08 pm
Hawks should go after monta ellis the guy have left cali. 2 come live in the south where he is from, yesterday i posted zaza, marvin, for monta i say the trade work for both team we need a point and warriors need a new make over.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
11:12 pm
Bring joe back and chill with the additional of monta you can have a nice starting five, Avery is a players coach he can get chill 2 come back 2 the hawks.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
cdog
June 2nd, 2010
11:13 pm
GRANDDAD, MY BAD,I GET THOSE NORTH CAROLINA GUYS MIXED UP. WHATS THE NORTH CAROLINA GUY NAME WITH THE MAJIC? HE WAS A TARGET OF THE HAWKS BEFORE THE SEASON.I APOLOGIZE. I WASN’T ANGRY, JUST FUNNING MY BROTHER
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
11:18 pm
SIGN FREE AGENT AL HARRINGTON AND PICK 24# SOLOMON ALABI.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
11:26 pm
Sautee:
NO if I were Memphis I would NOT let him go.
Which is why I knew that the trade machine would not allow
me to offer enough to tempt them. Needing (percieved)[?]
a point guard & some front ct. help [Z.Rand] sit. My thinking
was offer enough of our chips + draft picks to entice a stolen
gem. Heck, their under the cap with money – LR Ark. is close
maybe even a S&T for Joe.
OJ would go a long way toward gluing our future.
Giving up Teague: [last resort]
Ray felton (UFA) Kyle Lowry (RFA)
I know all this is in our minds but it’s my hobby.
Quite a shame I can’t play golf @ least for the time being.
That and I love the game !
darrell starks
June 2nd, 2010
11:26 pm
MUCH IMPROVE HAWKS WITH MORE EXCITEMENT.
STARTER MONTA, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, HORFORD,
BENCH TEAGUE, JAMAL, MOE, HARRINGTON, ALABI,
RESERVE BIBBY, MORRIS
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
11:29 pm
“That and I love the game !” *Basketball*
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
11:37 pm
cdog – Heck man were fine.
Why the apology…I had fun with our correspondence.
*Seriously, you get a free copy.
**I’m slow, the project is gonna take awhile.
***I’ve got alot of irons in the fire.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
11:39 pm
Grandad, I don’t know if its Mayo or Gasol, but I think one of those two Grizzlies should be a Hawk next season. And I think the Hawks have enough piece to make it happen without giving up the entire farm.
Ramon
June 2nd, 2010
11:50 pm
Here’s a new name for you Grandad that I wonder what the price for him in a trade would be, Mbah a Moute from Milwaukee. He’d be a great defensive option off of the bench for the Hawks as well, if he was available.
Grandad
June 2nd, 2010
11:57 pm
Ramon:
I don’t know if we can touch either.
But Gasol is untouchable.
He is like Al is to us.
I don’t blame them.
Talented Bigs don’t fall out of the sky.
*Thabeet? maybe?
Hollins on Gasol:
“Hardest worker on the team”
Mayo is probably close to being in the same boat.
They need to [and will] re-sign Rudy Gay.
It’s funny how that trade was panned (older brother)
but it’s actually worked out for Memphis.
It would be a heist, but Mayo
would be just the ticket for us.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:05 am
I’d be willing to offer Crawford, and next year’s 1st rd pick for Mayo and Thabeet. if it worked under the cap.
Ken Strickland
June 3rd, 2010
12:09 am
NAJEH-When Marvin scored 14.8PPG he was the teams 3rd scoring option. This yr, he became the teams 5th scoring option among the starters. The reasons he regressed this yr were:
(1) the addition of JCrawford limited his scoring opportunities,
(2) the emergence of AHorford as a scoring option also limited his scoring opportunities,
(3) he obviously lost confidence in his jump shot and withdrew,
(4) with JJ and Crawford doing so many ISO’s he and his teammates did a lot of clearing out and standing around and were shut out,
(5) unlike JJ, Crawford and Bibby, Marvin always attempted to maintain ball movement and never sought to disrupt the OFF to go ISO,
(6) he is by nature a none aggressive player, and was content to coast or disappear on OFF, which was obviously acceptable to Woodson.
He averaged his 6.3RPG before Woodson made the switching DEF his bread and butter.
Marvin could be a consistent 15-16PPG scorer if we brought him off picks for open jumpers, and as a spot up jumpshooter with a penetrating PG that can draw and kick. Hell, why make an issue of Marvins dribbling and driving difficulties, when we’ve all seen JJ and Crawford struggle with ISO’s and one on one, even with their excellent penetrating and ball handling skills.
Grandad
June 3rd, 2010
12:15 am
Ramon:
He [Mbah a Moute] is not as tall as listed but plays bigger
than he really is. I have a story about him that I wish I could
tell. Not a bad story – great kid – Ben Howland is the best.
He’s a winner. Maybe Marvin for him and an expiring contract?
I’ll check it out. Once again great kid, I have some personal
knowledge of him and his background. Will guard the everlovin’
piss oughta’ you.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:17 am
Grandad, he just seems like a winner who has no quit in him. I wouldn’t offer Marvin for him, but would offer Zaza.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 3rd, 2010
12:18 am
Darrell, if you had a 25 ppg scorer on your team, would you trade him for Marvin and Zaza? Just wondering…
Grandad
June 3rd, 2010
12:22 am
Co-sign Ken S. + Ive been saying all along;
Marv’s not a slsher.
Grandad
June 3rd, 2010
12:29 am
Ramon – You have to understand – the other team values him.
He was a starter for the Deer. To get value one must offer
something of value in return.
*Exception – A team is trying to unload a player [Jamal].
Bucks aren’t looking to rid themselves of Luc R M a M.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:37 am
Grandad, I understand. But with the Bucks in jeopardy of losing Kurt Thomas, I think they would find value in Zaza as well. And at the moment I think Zaza’s value on the market may be higher than Marvin’s because his contract is less.
darrell starks
June 3rd, 2010
1:13 am
Najeh warroirs have the six pick in this year draft adding zaza and marvin plus the 6# pick will make this team deeper, and not only that curry and ellis do not coexist on the court there have been 2 many struggles between the 2 player playing basically the same position, it would make only sense for them 2 trade ellis because of the team lack of progress and inconsistency on the court.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
Clyde
June 3rd, 2010
1:26 am
We need Sean Williams. Horford has proven he can’t get the job done.
darrell starks
June 3rd, 2010
1:26 am
WARRIORS DRAFT WESLEY JOHNSON WHO IN MY OPINION THE BEST PLAYER IN THE DRAFT BEHIND WALLS.
STARTER CURRY, WESLEY, MARVIN, RANDOLPH, BIEDRINS
BENCH CJ, MORROW, MAGGETTE, WRIGHT, ZAZA
RESERVE KELENNA, TURIAF
GO HAWKS!!!!!!
Grandad
June 3rd, 2010
1:55 am
Ramon you will like this one.
Last post of the eve for me.
My new project.
@ # 24 Hawks select:
Art parakhouski…6-11, 270…*7-1 w-span
*(not particularly impressive)
Hand length 9.5, hand width 10.5 (impressive)
only 6% body fat (exceptional)
Radford Univ. (not the girls school)
21 pts., 13 rebs., 59% fg, 2 blocks
from – Minsk, Belarus – wherever the heck that is.
I watched him @ the combine & I’m ashamed that I had
never heard of the young man. I listened to his interview
@ DraftExpress and he was an impressive young man.
Much more athletic than Zaza. Nice release on his mid-range
jumper. Plenty of bulk to bang with DH. This is a good omen;
he grew up as a swimmer and played soccer for 7 years. [footwork]
Alot to like. Yet…Pedergraph (still not a typo) can’t find
any players @ 24. Pedergraph – where amazing happens !
Najeh Davenpoop
June 3rd, 2010
2:39 am
“Art Parakhouski” sounds like someone who is more likely to win the Nobel Prize in Literature than the NBA Finals.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 3rd, 2010
2:44 am
Darrell, your contention that Curry and Ellis can’t coexist is fine, but that doesn’t mean they would accept Marvin and Zaza in return. You still haven’t answered my question. Would you, as the Warriors GM, trade Monta Ellis for Marvin and Zaza? Do you think that would make your team better if you were running that team?
northcyde
June 3rd, 2010
2:48 am
rusty
June 2nd, 2010
10:31 pm
northcyde
your posts ramble on & don make much sense. all year long you knock jc & claim how great jj is. jc played much better than your hero jj did. he choked & plaed like crap. his iso play wil never make this team play like it should which is better ball movement & an up tempo play. you knocked teague all season & praised bibby. teague never had a chance to show what he could do. everybody knows that he is super fast,can stay in front of the fastest guards in the nba & can penerate. we have to completely take the ball out of jj hands as we dribbles way to much & forces bad shots. as for our defense who knows what hell we can do or not do based on woodys stupid switching defense. i know that our bench was not strong but we also dont have any idea on anyone as woody stupidly refused to play anyone. i was always suprised at the huge minutes he gaved to mb & mw.often he gave mw more minutes than he gave to js. we need to get rid of mw,mb & moe. we need to get rid of jj as this team will always be playing iso joe. this is the only way joe can be effective. he certainly is not worth the huge salery he is demanding
*************************************
Rusty, don’t tell lies on me son. I gave Crawford his props all year. I just didn’t like when he’d keep jacking up bad shots when he was ice cold.
I don’t know what Hawks team you were watching, but JJ AND CRAWFORD played horrible in the playoffs. Crawford actually shot a lower percentage from the field ( 37% ) in the playoffs than JJ ( 39% ), so I don’t know what playoffs YOU were watching. They both sold us out.
LOL @ me praising Bibby. Bibby played well in November, and steadily got worse as the year wore on. But when Teague got into the game on most nights ( when the game was still in the balance ), he sucked too. I just didn’t cover up for the kid like most other people did. I did it for Acie, and got burned. I’m not going to make the same mistake, and do it for Teague.
LOL @ touting Teague’s man defense, when he couldn’t even stop JJ Redick from penetrating one time in the Orlando series. He’s fast and athletic. But right now, those are his best assets. People that have faith in Teague don’t even address what he can do skill wise on a basketball court. They just talk about his speed and athleticism.
Woody didn’t play the bench, because our bench ( for the most part ) SUCKED. Crawford was our “bench” . . period. The two guys he needed the most to go along with Crawford ( Evans and Zaza ), played sorry for most of the year. But mean ol Woody caused them to miss open jumpers and lay-ups all year . . . and didn’t play them as much . . . and opted to go with the guys who could get it done . . . awww.
If JJ leaves this team, and Crawford becomes the defacto go-to-guy for the Hawks, it will be straight up Armageddon for this franchise.
82games.com has it’s 2009 – 10 sortable CLUTCH PER 48 MIN stats out. Here are the Hawks clutch shooting percentages: ( last 5 minutes of 4th quarter and OT . . no more than 5 points up or down )
JJ shot 46.3% eFG and 44% 3FG in the clutch
Jamal shot 24.6% eFG and 12% 3FG in the clutch
So if that’s the dude you want taking shots for the Hawks at the end of most games, then we’ll quickly fall off the map. We better give all of those shots to Horford, if we lose JJ.
Be gone Rusty.
Najeh Davenpoop
June 3rd, 2010
2:53 am
Ken, I don’t disagree with anything you’re saying necessarily, but you can’t blame his big time regression in 3-point percentage and mediocre man-to-man defense on Woody, can you?
I’m not letting Woody and the circumstances off the hook when it comes to Marvin’s failures, but I feel like you are letting Marvin off the hook to an extent. Spot-up 3-point shooting in an isolation offense and man-to-man defense are not things that need to be coached or things that are dependent on the circumstances. All that requires is for Marvin to make a commitment to become good at those things.
I would honestly be OK with Marvin averaging 10 points and 5 boards a game if he became a lock down defender and knocked down 40% of his 3’s. But he’s been in the league for 5 years now, and regardless of who his coach or teammates are, he has to find a way to be good at something. It’s kind of the same argument northcyde (wrongly) makes with Teague — Marvin has to make an impact on the game somehow, and there are ways to do that which are independent of the surroundings.
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
6:39 am
Najeh….”Sure. Udonis Haslem. Glen Davis. DeJuan Blair. Leon Powe. Tyler Hansbrough. Taj Gibson. Drew Gooden”….you just named 5 guys under contract, a guy that will take at least the full MLE to sign in Haslem, and Gooden made $4.5M last year and had a good year (he’ll cost more than Bass as well). Plus, Bass’s playing time was directly related to Van Gundy’s desire to surround Dwight with 4 shooters.
“By the way, Gortat averages $6.5 million over the course of his contract, which runs for another 4 years. Along with Bass’ deal, that totals $10.5 million a year for two backup players, neither of whom has proven they can be a viable starter. In what universe is that a better investment than $11 million a year for a guy with Josh’s credentials?”….Josh avgs $12.4M over the next 3 years. So yes, I see value in having two spots covered for $2M less than your one spot over the next 3 years. Its called depth and cap management, plus I have Al Horford happy and developing in the PF spot, and I don’t have to see Josh cry and walk down the court everytime he doesn’t get a foul call.
“possibility of 10 points, 10 boards, and 2 blocks at center”….Only 3 centers in the league avgd 2 blocks a game, only 3 centers in the league avgd 10 rebs a game, 17 centers avgd 10 points a game. If you find a center that can give you all 3 while playing solid D, then you have something most teams would love to have. Al Horford was 4th in the league among rebounding centers and he’s never had a year as good as Gortat’s worst year (based on rebounding rate per 40 minutes).
I also see that you dropped the argument on stats when they proved exactly what ZaZa was capable of. If given 30 minutes a game, he’ll give you 12 pts and 7 or 8 rebs, but can you stand his defense.
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
6:43 am
(another thought) you have to consider the sample size because it didn’t happen a lot, but….the Hawks best point differential came when ZaZa was playing the 5 and Horford was playing the 4….Just another reason why I want to see Horford at the 4 more. ZaZa should remain our backup 5.
O'Brien
June 3rd, 2010
7:53 am
@ Najeh,
How does the Umpire miss that call when the play didn’t even seem that close? That’s crazy.
@ Northcyde,
We don’t agree on many things, but we agree on Marvin.
@ JoJo the Godfather,
Josh Smith is 24, with more room to grow, especially under a new coach. We know what Brandon Bass and Gortat are; Solid backups who could be decent starters. I need more than that if I’m going to trade Josh. especially to a division rival.
jgsbrids
June 3rd, 2010
8:13 am
amare without nash is useless!!!!!!!
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
8:23 am
O’Brien…you’re probably right, but Bass is 25 and Gortat is 26. Gortat has been stuck behind Dwight for 3 years and has never been given more than 13 min/game on avg a year. you can’t assume he won’t get better with playing time. also, if its not even, ask for Fran Vazquez and/or the 29th pick in the draft. if its as lopsided a trade as some think, then orlando will gladly comply. Vazquez won’t come over to play behind Dwight. The guy’s a skilled center who does a nice job running the pick and roll with Rubio. I’d be happy if we could just get our hands on him in exchange for a draft pick, and then convince him to come play for us.
lewis
June 3rd, 2010
8:54 am
Many great comments.
The Hawks looked a lot tougher in the paint with Zaza at 5 and Al at 4.
My personal belief is that you need a PF with A.Horford’s size. quickness, jumpshot and free throw shooting ability to compete with the elite PF’s:
P.Gasol, K.Garnett, T. Duncan, L. Aldridge, C. Bosh, A. Stoudemire, Z. Randolph
You’re honestly going to tell me you think J.Smith can cover these guys without getting into foul trouble? He’s a phenomenal help defender but he doesn’t have the size or seeming will to cover these guys one on one around the paint.
I love J.Smith, he’s an impact player who does it on both sides of the court. I love A.Horford even more because he clearly wants to win, puts in great efforts night in and night out, and is fundamentally sound. So, answer me this: How are we supposed to keep Al (one of the few reasons people watch the hawks) when he clearly wants to be a PF?
The whole center argument boils down not necessarily to our front line being too small to win a championship, but that that Al has publicly stated he wants to play PF. Is the goal here to find a real center, or to figure out a way to keep Al on the squad?
lewis
June 3rd, 2010
8:56 am
add odom to that list
lewis
June 3rd, 2010
9:01 am
Josh and Al need to get together, throw ego’s aside, and make a decision as to whether they’ll be able to play on the same team for years to come or not. Starting 2 pf’s is great for the regular season but it just doesn’t cut it in the playoffs.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
9:58 am
Grandad, I like that he’s an athlete beyond the basketball court. That goes a long way towards conditioning. And we know swimmers (and cyclists) are always in the best shape.
Lewis, you asked can Josh guard opposing PF without getting into foul trouble? And then you manage to say you think Zaza and Al did better than Al and Josh? Somehow Al and Josh averaged the same amount of fouls this season and for their careers. If you look closely at the game footage, you will see majority of the fouls for BOTH came from them providing help defense when someone on the perimeter allowed their assignment to penetrate the lane. With the exception of Duncan and Lewis (who had advantage of Howard) what PF have you seen just simply use Josh? The answer is none! Its funny you mentioned Bosh’s name, because I remember Josh holding Bosh under 15 points a couple times this season. You mentioned KG, but I remember even in the playoffs 3 years ago Josh neutralized KG’s effect, and that was the biggest reason the Hawks went to game 7.
Speaking of Boston, its funny Al and Josh didn’t have any problems with Boston’s front line this season or previously in the playoffs. Yet you say they need another center to start on the lineup? So tell me, what center can the Hawks acquire who is a better center than Al Horford? Because the last I remember Horford was only one of 4 centers selected to the All Star game, and neither of the other three are available. And Josh was named the best defensive power forward in the league (2nd in DPOY).
Feudfinder
June 3rd, 2010
10:00 am
That was a good one RAMON. Get a good coach, get a notable center, sign JJ, and Atlanta is ours.
O'Brien
June 3rd, 2010
10:02 am
I haven’t read the interview, so I don’t know the quotes or the context. But if Al did in fact say publicly that he wants to play PF, then I would be disappointed in him. He is on his way to being one of the leaders on this team, so I don’t think he should speak out publicly like that.
But the Hawks are fine with Al and Josh. What they need is a defensive minded center with size, who can play 20 mpg backing up Al, and can play center when Al gives Josh a break at PF.
JoJo,
Speaking of undersized PFs, here is a name for you. Craig Smith. He is 26, unrestricted and only made $2.3 mil playing for the Clippers last year. He averaged 8 and 4 in 16 mpg. I think we can sign him for the bi-annual exception (~$2.9 mil). He has flaws, but I think he would be worth the price.
bigdave
June 3rd, 2010
10:13 am
“For all the talk of how Horford is not a center, there are two centers in the league who cause him problems — Howard and the Shaq/Ilgauskas combo. Horford at least holds his own against every other center in the league, including Brook Lopez, Andrew Bogut, Andrew Bynum, Brendan Haywood, as well as the pseudo-centers like Bosh and Amare that so many people on this blog have a hard-on for. Blowing up an otherwise very productive front court because two teams in the league give the Hawks problems is an idiotic idea.”
…….
exactly. Al Horford is a center people.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
10:20 am
Thank you @ Bigdave!
Rod from College Park
June 3rd, 2010
10:55 am
“It’s like Rod says about Marvin . . the dude is wide open on most plays in which teams go to double JJ. When he gets open looks, he HAS to knock them down. If he misses, he’s not going to get the ball.
People talk about ball movement. But what good is ball movement, if guys can’t do basic things to score the basketball? The purpose of ball movement is to get the best possible shot, whether that’s a lay-up or a wide open jumper. If guys get the ball in scoring position . . . score the basketball.”
I couldn’t have said it better. So I guess people really think that he will knock those jumpshots down with a defender in his face. LOL
“Marvin could be a consistent 15-16PPG scorer if we brought him off picks for open jumpers, and as a spot up jumpshooter with a penetrating PG that can draw and kick. Hell, why make an issue of Marvins dribbling and driving difficulties, when we’ve all seen JJ and Crawford struggle with ISO’s and one on one, even with their excellent penetrating and ball handling skills.”
Marvin will never in his basketball career get more open jumpers than he has gotten in the last two years. Stop with the Rip Hamilton comparisons also. They are not even close to similar players. Rip could do it all, and Marvin can’t. Plus Rip was always considered one of the most well conditioned athletes in the game, and he could run all day, Marvin can’t. The bottom line on Marvin is this, he can practice, get put in a motion offense, play in the triangle, but the fact that his is goofy, and clumsy, and timid will never change. I promise you that there are guys in high school right now, who could provide more for the Hawks than he could today.
GeeMack
June 3rd, 2010
11:19 am
I have seen a lot of really good suggestions on this blog. However most of them involve not breaking up the core group.
The Hawks won’t be better by bringing back Chills. The teams that dominated you last year will the same if the Hawks don’t upgrade their talent.
Remember JJ is not leaving ATL, because he wants more money. He’s leaving because in the 5 yrs he’s been here the organization have not brought in anyone of significance to help bring in a title.
We know all champioship teams have the same make up; 2 or 3 great core players, and they are very great defensive teams.
Grandad
June 3rd, 2010
11:23 am
Najeh:
Art is short for ”Artsiom”
*Artsiom Parakhouski* – I’m not makin’ it up.
“sounds like someone who is more likely to win the Nobel Prize in Literature than the NBA Finals.”…..Now that’s funny !
O’B:
Craig Smith – Co-sign ! – I think they call him the ”Bull”.
lewis
June 3rd, 2010
11:26 am
I’m just saying, there’s going to be absolutely nothing we can do to stop Horford from leaving when a team in playoff contention with a “true” center offers Al a contract to play PF.
lewis
June 3rd, 2010
11:31 am
not that they can afford it…..but…
C – Noah
PF – Horford
SF – Deng
SG- Joe Johnson
PG – Derrick Rose
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
11:54 am
Lewis, we can offer Horford more money. That’s something we can do.
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
11:57 am
Quest….If Josh is the superior player to Horford, then why was Horford chosen for the all star game rather than Smith? They just trying to pizz you off?…Also, here’s what Hoopinion has to say about a Josh & Al comparison:
“Josh Smith (deservedly) gets talked about in terms of what he might become and what the hypothetical consolidation and maturation of his talents might mean for the Atlanta Hawks. Even though Al Horford’s skills are more conventional he should probably be discussed in similar terms. Horford recognizes his strengths and weaknesses more readily than does Smith so his improvement has and could come from refining his existing skills rather than a hope for enlightenment.”
“Whether or not Horford improves his post game sufficiently to consistently draw a double-team and thus fully take advantage of his passing ability will likely determine whether he remains an arguable All-Star or becomes an arguable All-NBA player.”
“Horford complemented his work in and around the paint with a devastatingly accurate face-up jumper. 21.5% of Horford’s field goal attempts came between 16 and 23 feet. It’s the worst percentage shot in the game in general, but not so much so if one, as Horford did last season, makes the shot 48% of the time rather than the league average of 39.8% and uses the shot judiciously….Josh Smith took 64 more long jump shots than Horford and made 20 fewer.”
“Horford’s defensive role was essentially the opposite of his offensive role. Mike Woodson’s switching defense called on Horford to do everything: guard the opposing center in the post, guard the opposing point guard away from the basket on the screen-and-roll, help on dribble penetration from the wings, and rebound the misses. If defensive usage rate were a real thing rather than a term of art, then Horford presumably would have been among the league leaders as his all-court defensive effort rarely failed to impress.”
“it’s not inconceivable that Horford (already the superior defensive rebounder) could challenge Josh Smith as the team’s best defender.”
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:09 pm
Jojo, Horford made the all star game because he was listed at a different position than Josh was. Horford wouldn’t have made the all star game at the PF position, because the PF position is more saturated with talent than the C position is. Actually Horford wouldn’t have started at PF for any of the other 7 teams that made it to the 2nd round of the play offs this season. So its very questionable as to why everyone wants to move him to PF, when he wouldn’t be in the top 10 PFs in the league, and yes Josh is in the top 10 PFs in the league.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:10 pm
Jojo that is also why Josh received more votes for ALL NBA this past season than Horford.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:12 pm
Jojo, I’m sorry the coaches of the NBA listed Josh as the 7th best PF in the league.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:20 pm
Also, of the 6 PFs ranked higher than Josh, by the coaches, you can argue three of them (Duncan, Nowitzki, and Gasol) have already played their basketball and are on the decline of their career, while Josh hasn’t even peaked. So its easy to see Josh being in the top 3-4 PFs for the next 5-6 seasons. Also for whoever said Al recognizes his flaws more than Josh’s. I would beg to ask the question since entering the league, who has shown more improvement in their game, Josh or Al. Al is a great player and I want to see Josh and he continue to be on the Atlanta Hawks for a long time. But Al isn’t doing anything this season that he wasn’t doing as a rookie. His leadership skills are improving, but other than that you can’t tell any major difference in his game. However, each season NBA coaches marvel at the development of different aspects of Josh’s game. So I would think Josh has more of a chance of improving than Al does.
lewis
June 3rd, 2010
12:44 pm
of the PF’s rated above Josh, they are all bigger and can all hit jumpshots. they also don’t suffer from consistent in-game mental lapses like Josh does. Don’t get me wrong, I love Josh’s game, it’s his decision making process in the clutch that frightens me.
Sautee
June 3rd, 2010
12:45 pm
Truth-serum said:
“Altlanta (sic) needs a starting center who can and will play defense because defense wins ball games. and particularly defense under the basket.”
Hey Truth-serum, you keep running from this:
How much did having the Defensive Player of the Year and the league’s top shot blocker help Orlando?
I’ll wait.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:51 pm
Lewis, Josh is more clutch than Horford, and has proven that many times. Also Bosh isn’t bigger than Josh. And Gasol isn’t stronger than Josh. Gasol, Dirk, and Duncan are bigger than Al too because they’re over 7 ft. Many of the points and rebounds that Horford gets come from the plays that Josh creates. How many times a game does Josh find Horford in the lane for easy FG attempts (especially in the games where Josh gets tired of JJ and Crawford ballhogging). Many of Josh’s decisions came from the offense that Woody ran where he didn’t hold the backcourt accountable for not getting the frontcourt more touches in a good position.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:52 pm
LOL @ Sautee.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
12:52 pm
Sautee it helped about the same amount that Bynum is helping the Lakers
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
12:53 pm
Ramon…you have no idea where coaches would rank Horford at PF. It would not be a surprise to see him ranked ahead of Smith. The way Al scores in the post, his #’s would only improve if he was getting to post up PF’s rather than C’s, and have PF’s trying to block him out rather than C’s.
“Actually Horford wouldn’t have started at PF for any of the other 7 teams that made it to the 2nd round”….Horford would have easily started for Orlando & Cleveland, and Phoenix & San Antonio would have just moved Amare & Duncan to C to make room (they both play a lot of minutes there already).
“But Al isn’t doing anything this season that he wasn’t doing as a rookie”….hmmm, that 15 footer he added this year was solid. how is josh’s jumper coming along? who scores at a higher rate around the basket? who’s the better rebounder?….did you catch the line above that said Josh had taken 64 more long jump shots last year than Al and had made 20 less than Al? Don’t mistake flash for substance. They are both great players, but Al is the better player right now. If Josh can speed up his release and hit the 15 footer on occasion and grow up mentally, then he could pass Horford.
Sautee
June 3rd, 2010
12:54 pm
Ramon and bigdave,
It just goes to show that when one has an unquenchable hatred for a player, that facts such as:
– An All-Star berth
– the stats that northcyde brought showing Al to be the best defender of his man %-wise
- playoff blocks (Al was 4th among all centers)
– Mike Woodson himself (Truth-serum’s wet dream) saying “I remember last year after Al got hurt those two times … We were exposed. Al’s the one guy I feared going down.”
Those things are ALL summarily ignored.
It’s gotta be the HATE.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
1:12 pm
Jojo, Horford doesn’t finish around the basket better than Josh. If you just posted a stat that said Al shoots that much better from 15 feet than Josh does, and Josh is only shooting .45% lower than Al, wouldn’t that mean that Josh must be a better scorer and more efficient scorer than Al is around the basket? How else would it be that close? Josh is a better rebounder than Al. There are many rebounds that Al gets because Josh allows him to get them (Josh isn’t one who cares about stats, just winning). Also one or two rebounds of Al’s come AFTER a defensive possession where Josh defensive pressure has forced the opposing team into a bad shot. And if you observe the stats you will also see Al only averages 0.1 more offensive rebounds than Josh. Yet we’re all aware of the positioning of Woody’s scheme that left Josh out on the perimeter constantly. So if Al is a better rebounder, how is it that he averaged the same amount of offensive rebounds as Josh does, when Al is under the basket more often than Josh? Also think about the team, somehow Josh manages to be in the top 3 in every category (except 3pt statistics and jumpers percentages) for the team. And you stated that Josh scares you in the clutch. So how is it that every one say Josh had a bad postseason for him, and yet he had the exact same averages during the postseason as Al did, yet no one says Al had a bad postseason. That either means more is expected out of Josh on a regular basis, and he normally provides it, or Al didn’t perform in the post season either.
By the way, you say if Al played for the Spurs or Suns Amare or Duncan would’ve played the C position. So wouldn’t that mean that another coach would’ve had a natural PF playing the C position? Because neither Amare nor Duncan is a natural C. And with Amare, Al still would’ve ended up guarding the C position. Out of Amare, Duncan, Dirk, Boozer, Bosh, and Gasol which one you think Al is better than? Because those are the only PFs the League voted higher than Josh. And I don’t see Al being better than either of those 6 either.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
1:19 pm
Sautee, in my mind Al is a great player. But he’s not the best PF on this team, where as he can be in the top 3 Centers in the league! Its all about match ups. Al dominates 95% of the centers in the league! Al and Josh together dominate 95% of the frontcourts in the league. If the main two problems that Al and Josh face can be addressed (more defensive awareness on the backcourt, and another defensive minded big who can come off of the bench, Zaza isn’t defensive minded), then there’s no way that Josh and Al won’t come close to dominating 100% of the league on more nights. Dwight Howard didn’t beat the Hawks. Last season, Z didn’t beat the Hawks. Open 3 pt shooters, and Lebron beat the the Hawks!
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
1:28 pm
“And I don’t see Al being better than either of those 6 either.”….maybe not, but he’s better than Josh.
“If you just posted a stat that said Al shoots that much better from 15 feet than Josh does, and Josh is only shooting .45% lower than Al, wouldn’t that mean that Josh must be a better scorer and more efficient scorer than Al is around the basket?”….not necessarily, it depends on how many shots you take in each category. if he takes more shots around the basket, then he can close the gap in total shooting % even though Al may make a higher % in that range as well.
Josh had a bad postseason because he was seen multiple times walking down the court with is lip stuck out like a 4 year old. Josh is not a bad kid. You never read about him in the paper doing something wrong. He just needs to be more professional and mature. Being around immaturity will pizz a grown man off when having a bad day at work (round 2 of the playoffs).
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
1:31 pm
One last comment on the subject. I support Josh being our starting PF in 2010, and Al being our starting C. But if I had to chose one today to move forward with…to build my franchise around…then I’d chose Al Horford. He has the intangibles to make those around him better.
O'Brien
June 3rd, 2010
1:32 pm
Josh has shown tremendous improvement since coming to the League. But the main reason for that is because when he came into the league, he was 19, with no college experience. When Al got here, he had 3 years experience at a very good program (Florida) with back to back NCAA championships, so his game was more refined.
The article summed it up well though. Horford knows his limitations, so he plays within himself. Would he be a better PF than Josh? I don’t know. But he wouldn’t have the ups and downs that Josh has. Tim Duncan is known as the big fundamental because he does not have any flash to his game. But he gets the job done.
Al is not on his level, but thats how his game is. Not very flashy. Josh, on the other hand, will have the highlight dunk, or the awesome pass etc. But Al is more likely not to make the silly plays that Josh makes.
I agree with Ramon. I don’t think the Hawks have to choose between Josh and Al (not yet anyway). All the Hawks need is a defensive minded center who can backup Al, and can play more minutes as needed against the bigger front lines. Personally, I like having Josh and Al on the team together. But we need a defensive minded center. ZaZa is not cutting it on defense.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
1:34 pm
But Jojo, you just said Josh took 64 more jumpers than Al. So once again if Josh shoots so much more poorly from the basket than Al, and yet their FG% is so close. That must means Josh shoots well above Al from attempts around the basket.
Mr. Logic
June 3rd, 2010
1:35 pm
Someone wrote earlier about a trade with the Hawks sending Joe Johnson & Marv Williams for Igudala & Dalembert of the Sixers. Scratch Igudala!! He is a decent player but decent small forwards are common and can be found easier than any other player. The player they can probably get in the trade and need the most is LOUIS WILLIAMS..the PG from ATL. He is the man… and with a defensive minded coaching staff and some good home cooking, he can win most improved player of the year. His ball handling and passing skills have step up since his rookie year, it’s obvious he works at his game. With a real center to work with Smith and Horford inside, they can win the NBA Championship. Plus, Philly can draft another point guard with the #2 pick this year. Mark my words Louis can be the great point guard Atlanta needs. I would even add Jeff Teague if need be (he is not a great ballhandler in my opinion). Rick S. should make it happen.
But he won’t, cause he is Rick Sund.
I remember him in my Dallas days. The Dallas Mavs with Rick Sund and Norm S drafted SF Mark Aguire, instead of Isiah Thomas PG with the first pick they ever had..dumb..real dumb.
Doesn’t that remind you of someone?
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
1:42 pm
O’Brien, you think Horford would be able to guard the PFs such as Gerald Wallace, Lewis, Bosh, Dirk, Kenyon Martin, and other mobile PFs? I’m not asking for debate, just asking to know your opinion on that.
Jojo, if Josh is a better defensive player than Al, and if Josh does more things offensively than Al, how is Al better? The things that Josh does better than Al, he does better by a wide margin. The things that Al does better than Josh, he barely does it better than Josh. The thing that everyone says when looking at Al is solid. And that’s good. But on a BAD night Josh gives you 14/8/4apg/2bpg/1spg. That’s on a BAD night. On a good night, Josh gives you 23/12/6apg/3bpg/1.5-2spg. On every night Al gives you 14/10/1apg/1bpg/0spg. So how is Al better? If Al doesn’t score over 10 points, the only other thing he can do is rebound. If Josh doesn’t score over 10 points in a game, you still have to check to see what he did on the boards, in assists, on blocks, and in the passing lanes. Not to mention, most times its Josh’s outlet passes that lead to the best fast breaks for the Hawks.
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
1:44 pm
“But Jojo, you just said Josh took 64 more jumpers than Al. So once again if Josh shoots so much more poorly from the basket than Al, and yet their FG% is so close. That must means Josh shoots well above Al from attempts around the basket.”….again, not necessarily. that’s not how averages work. If Horford shoots 40% higher on a 100 shots, and 2% higher on 1,000 shots, then the total shooting % will be closer to the 2% # than the 40% #. Just concern yourself with total shooting %, 5% or so is a huge difference over a full season. Given 20 shots a game, thats an extra basket every game or 2pts on your scoring avg.
JoJo the Godfather
June 3rd, 2010
1:54 pm
“But on a BAD night Josh gives you 14/8/4apg/2bpg/1spg”….
now give me turnovers, shooting %, and how bad he disrupts the team chemistry with his whining….
Sautee
June 3rd, 2010
2:20 pm
Ramon, Jojo, and others,
Al is an All-Star Center. Whether he is better at PF than Josh is a moot point.
I agree that Al likely does NOT make the All-Star team as a PF. His advantage is his quickness, relentlessness and footwork against slower players.
You know it’s funny that Dave Cowens and Wes Unseld can be in the Hall of Fame at 6′ 9″ and 6″ 7.5″ when THEY played against “true centers” like Wilt, Nate Thurmond, and Kareem, but Horford is “too small” to play against far smaller centers these days. LOL.
drmaryb
June 3rd, 2010
2:30 pm
BIGS
Those the biggest & ugliest list of names I have ever heard. Dampieer being the ugliest of them all!
I wouldn’t pay “one-red-coin” to see any of these cats play at Phillips Arena!
BTW, is Dampieer still in the league? I mean really! This pile of BS we are shifting through is pathetic &
at the end of the day – we will see Perkins -vs- Gasol. Is that – “As Good As It Gets?”
Again, with that #24 pick? Take the best BIG available & call it a day!
now, go home people.
SMH
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
2:47 pm
Jojo, on that bad night, he disrupts the team so much they manage to win 53 games. And when he’s out of the lineup the points in the paint goes up over 50%. He disrupts the team so much that everyone sees he’s easily the biggest cheerleader for his teammates over anyone on the team. He doesn’t disrupt the team any more than JJ dribbling the ball for 18 seconds and then passing the ball to Smoove with 5 seconds on the shot clock. He doesn’t disrupt the team any more than Bibby inability to stay in front of his man constantly puts the front line at disadvantages. He doesn’t disrupt the team any more than Crawford coming down and shooting on 4 out of 6 offensive possessions and missing on all 4. We sit here and watch the games, and we complain about officiating and Woody. Yet its merely a hobby or interest to us, and we’re not investing anything more than $200 for tickets or 3 hours out of the day 3x a week, and some of us be on here about to go crazy. Yet we expect Josh (and other NBA players) to do this for a living, give upto 16 hours a day and every ounce of energy they have into succeeding. Yet when faced with a coach who’s inapt to drawing an offensive play or a referee who’s unfairly calling a game, we expect these same players to calmly turn around and walk back down the court. Yet Kobe, Wade, and others all had more technical fouls than Josh did. However, when they do it, its called the will to win. But we call Josh a whiner for it. Kobe and Wade have both lead to a coach being fired or released out of their contract. Kobe and Wade have both PUBLICLY complained about teammates and coaching staffs inability to do things. Yet Smoove shows frustration from things going on on the court, or mistakes that Woody continued to make after 5 seasons. Yet we call him a whiner for it. See how Smoove is under another coach before labeling him that.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
2:49 pm
By the way, Wade and Kobe have both been slow to get back on defense on numerous occasions, (even Lebron has). Josh’s ability is his own worst enemy because for the last 4 seasons, we’ve spent more time talking about Josh than any other player. Yet fail to realize that his play constantly draws you into looking at him for the good and bad. Some of you only look at what Josh is doing on defense/offense, instead of seeing how Josh is often times directing HORFORD AND MARVIN as to where to go on offensive sets.
HawksMagic
June 3rd, 2010
2:52 pm
Why not sign kendric perkins from boston? He would b the piece that atlanta needs….Just saying!
O'Brien
June 3rd, 2010
3:17 pm
Ramon,
Defensively, I think horford could guard a lot of those guys. But one area where Josh has the edge like you mentioned, is the intangibles.
Although i think on horford’s best night, he might have the potential for 28 points, 15 rebounds and 2 blocks. on Josh’s best night, he has the potential for 24 points, 10 rebounds, 4 blocks, 4 assists, and 2 steals (close to the numbers you mentioned). Thats awesome from your PF.
And the big advantage that horford has at center will not be there if he switches to PF. So I’m okay with horford starting at center. But we new a defensive center to back him up.
Plus I think Josh will improve even more under our new head coach.
drmaryb
June 3rd, 2010
3:40 pm
INTANGIBLES
How do you call Josh’s stat lines INTANGIBLES we you can see, touch and feel them?
Derek
June 3rd, 2010
4:10 pm
I like the Brandon Heyward idea. Hawks shoulg pursue that one.
O'Brien
June 3rd, 2010
5:15 pm
Drmaryb,
I stand corrected. Josh is the stat sheet filler upper, while horford has the leadership, which is more of the intangible
ASG is cheap!
June 3rd, 2010
7:25 pm
Why on earth are Hawks fans wanting Joe back? The guy bashed the city and quit on this team during the most important time of the year. If we max out JJ, the Hawks will always be a 2nd round team. Complacency has to stop in Atlanta sports. JJ is not a star player, let him leave and let’s build around what we have and hope to free up money for Carmelo next season.
Ramon
June 3rd, 2010
8:02 pm
Big Ray, I stated Gerald Wallace. Wallace is simply listed best as a F, not a SF or a PF. He plays equal time at both positions often (he and Diaw are often interchanged).
If River leaves Boston, my wild guess is their next coach will be Phil Jackson, Rudy Tomjanovich, or possibly Jeff Van Gundy.
Simpdawg
June 4th, 2010
11:06 am
Ramon,
If Doc Rivers decides not to return to the Celtics next season, many believe that Kevin McHale may coach the team. A number of NBA coaching sources told ESPN.com’s Marc Stein that McHale would receive strong consideration for the job should Rivers walk away. Former NBA point guard and current ESPN analyst Mark Jackson has never coached in the NBA but he’s getting a second interview for the Atlanta Hawks head-coaching gig, according to AOL Fanhouse.
PURE
June 5th, 2010
2:57 pm
Hire Mark Jackson & run Marvin Williams out of the ATL!…
indian escort site
July 16th, 2010
1:02 pm
It is certainly interesting for me to read that article. Thanx for it. I like such themes and anything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read a bit more on this blog soon.
Jane Kripke
escort donna lugano
August 31st, 2010
1:53 pm
Keep on posting such stories. I love to read stories like that. Just add more pics