Atlanta Hawks Squawks: Hawks 104, Bucks 96

Milwaukee– I told Smoove I thought this was the Hawks’ best road effort since they won at Utah way back on Feb. 22. He thought about it for a few seconds before agreeing. “Probably so, all-around. We pretty much led the whole game. Even though they went on a run in the second half, we didn’t bend. We kept fighting. We kept with our game plan and used our advantages.”

– And, what do you know, one of those advantages was stout defense. The Hawks were active and energetic from the jump. I don’t recall seeing many lulls. The Bucks stayed in it by making tough shots and scoring off some loose ball scrambles. They didn’t stay in it because of lax rotations, half-hearted closeouts or any of the other lapses we’ve seen from the Hawks lately.

– “Everything was solid from beginning to end,” Woody said. “We are going to need that the rest of the way. We’ll face Cleveland on Wednesday and then we’ve got to get ready for the playoffs.”

– It’s hard to find anything the Hawks did poorly. The 12 turnovers, I suppose, but look at some of the other numbers: 53 percent shooting, 52 points in the paint, six players in double figures scoring, 19 of 27 from the line, 48-34 advantage on the boards, 11 blocked shots, 39 percent shooting by the Bucks . . . you get the idea.

– The added bonus for the Hawks is everything that happened in this game sends a message to the Bucks, who pretty much gave the Hawks their best Bogut-less shot and couldn’t get a lead after the first quarter.

– “I think the focus was a little different tonight considering that it’s a potential matchup in the playoffs,” J.J. said. “Knowing we had this game and one more left, we wanted to go out with a bang and go into the postseason with some momentum.”

– J.J. was excellent. It’s not just that he scored 31 points, it’s that he hung back in the fourth and let others do their thing. He took just three shots in the fourth, only one of them in Iso. The hand doesn’t appear to be an issue so far. “He was solid tonight,” Woody said. “He shot it well and was probing the defense. He did a good job of knowing when he needed to make plays.”

– And how about Zaza? Al gets into foul trouble and the Hawks don’t skip a beat because Zaza scored, he rebounded, he kicked out for open jumpers, he was tough around the basket. “Zaza did a great job coming in,” Al said. “He came in and did what needed to be done.”

– With Crawford out Woody told Rook’ before the game he needed something from him. He got it. “He can stay in front of Jennings and Ridnour and all of those guards,” Al said. “That works to our advantage.”

– “Rook controlled the game for a little bit,” Woody said. “He made a few mistakes but a lot of that was guys not being ready for him delivering the ball”

Mo was solid as well. Bibby (seven rebounds!) was good. Al had a double-double despite playing just 25 minutes. Marvin was aggressive. See a trend here? “Everybody who played tonight contributed to the win,” Woody said.

– Smoove had six blocks. The Bucks’ guards thought they could go at him when he switched off to them. They were wrong. “They had their bigs switching on onto our smalls and taking advantage of that was difficult for us,” Scott Skiles said.

– The Hawks led from 4:20 in the first quarter. When the Bucks made their inevitable run to cut a 12-point lead to 89-87 the Hawks scored on five of their next six possessions.

– Look how many high-percentage shots the Hawks got during that stretch, too: Marvin slashed through the lane for a basket, Al converted a 3-point play, Al made an open jump shot, Marvin scored on a layup and J.J. made two free throws.

– That was game over. “We executed down the stretch,” Woody said. “It was a hard-fought victory for our team. (The Bucks) are playing for something as well.”

– The Hawks showed how they were in control in the first quarter. Al worked on Kurt Thomas in the post, and J.J. got to the basket. Once the Bucks focused on those two, Bibby shook free for open jump shots and made three straight 3-pointers.

– The Hawks moved 1 ½ games ahead of idle Boston. The Hawks would clinch the third seed if the Celtics lose at Chicago on Tuesday. If Boston wins, the Hawks would need to beat Cleveland at Philips Arena on Wednesday (edit: unless the Celtics also lose to Milwaukee in their finale) to finish ahead of the Celtics.

– “I don’t know if LeBron is going to play or not but it don’t matter,” Woody said. “We’ve been good at home this year and we need a win.”

– I’m out, Hawks fans.

MC

103 comments Add your comment

terrell

April 13th, 2010
5:48 pm

Your’re right Rusty, this team has underachieved. Mo Evans said so himself. I said it a while back and the Woody lovers jumped all over me with that “He’s won more games every year” crap. lol! I commend Woody for what he’s done, I just dont think he can take us to the next level. He’s maxed out imo. Hope I’m wrong.

drmaryb

April 13th, 2010
7:55 pm

If Teague is TIMID in the lane? How is that Mr. Woodson’s fault? Teague should have stayed on the school bus & stayed in school!!!

This is the NBA Man! This ia a Grown Man’s Business!!!

This is NOT Pre-K!

Give me a break!

Ken Strickland

April 13th, 2010
9:42 pm

ASTRO JOE-If a HC consistently tells his players to do one thing and they do another, then yes, the HC has the problem. A HC is suppose to control his team, not the other way around. If he can’t, he needs to go, it’s just that simple. It’s the HC’s responsibility to relate, instruct, motivate, direct, develop and impliment, while getting his players to buy into what he’s trying to accomplish, the way he’s wants to accomplish it.

If players routinely ignore the HC and do whatever they want, and that HC is stupid enough to continue playing and relying on those same players without making an issue of it when it happens, he needs to go, period. I’m surprised you don’t already know that.

Hell, you dilusional WOODY LOVERS want to hold the players responsible for everything, especially for not being able to overcome problems with Woody’s limited halfcourt OFF and beloved switching DEF. What fool in his or her right mind would expect Smoove, Horford, Zaza and JoSmith to be able to consistently go out on the permeter and prevent lightning fast PG’s from penetrating into the lane? And what fool in his right mind expects Bibby and Crawford to be able to hold their own against PF’s and C’s under the basket?

How stupid does one have to be not to see the flaw in this setup, yet we see your BELOVED WOODY consistently forcing these players into those stupid matchups gm after gm./ Why, because he’s too stupid and/or too stubborn to recognize a problem with this setup. He’d rather stand before the media after a loss, or very poor performance, and make poor DEF play an excuse, rather than make an adjustment during the gm.

HOW IN THE HELL CAN YOU BLAME THE PLAYERS FOR PLAYING POOR DEF AND BEING UNABLE TO CONSISTENTLY OVERCOME MATCHUP PROBLEMS THAT THEIR BONE HEADED HC CREATES BY FORCING THEM TO PLAY A DEF THAT AUTOMATICALLY CREATES THESE MATCHUP PROBLEMS? STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES WOODY LOVERS!!