Hawks Squawks: 76ers 105, Hawks 98

–It had been a minute since you could say the Hawks opened with an unfocused effort and stayed in that mode. Maybe their last game at Washington but at least they turned it on in the fourth quarter to win that one. You might have to go back to the loss to the Heat before the All-Star game.

– Sure, the Hawks have had issues closing out games but they haven’t been sleepwalking. Until now. “I think from the start we just weren’t with it,” Al said. “I know it’s a long season but games like this are unacceptable, especially at this time of year when we have something at stake.”

– That latter part is why you can’t say this is just one of those games in a long season. The Hawks are playing for something. If they are serious about a special postseason they can’t still be using that crutch with 10 games left.

– The Hawks came crashing down after finally beating the Magic on Smoove’s tip dunk. ”You always know after a big game like Orlando can’t have a letdown,” Jamal said. “We should have handled our business from the beginning and been done with it.”

– Al really wasn’t trying to hear that. “I don’t think that (Orlando) game had anything to do with this one,” he said. “I feel like we overlooked (the Sixers) and that’s not the right thing to do. If you do that in this league any team can beat you.”

– This game and at the Wizards both fit my theory about the Hawks lacking energy when they play on the road in front of sparse crowds. OK, so the Nets W didn’t t mesh with that but, well, that was the Nets.

– These were the Sixers, who actually match up decently with the Hawks due to Iguodola and Dalembert in the frontcourt. I lost track of how many times those two got to the rim for dunks and layups.

– Nothing illustrated the Hawks’ effort issues like Philadelphia’s 58 points in the paint and 28 fastbreak points. Not hard for the Sixers to shoot 50 percent with all those easy points. And the Hawks’ 19 turnovers were due to poor focus against an athletic, scrappy team that tries hard. The Hawks could be twice the team if they consistently added those last two traits to their talent.

– Philadelphia’s points in the paint also highlight the potential issues with the switching defense when the Hawks face a team that also has long athletes. And those fastbreak points are what can happen with opponents who match the Hawks’ speed and surpass their effort.

– “From time to time we come out with a lack of focus,” J.J. said. “That team still plays hard. We didn’t show up. We acted like we could turn it on the fourth quarter.”

– Ah, yes, the fourth quarter. Presented with a chance to still pull out a W despite everything they did wrong, the Hawks’ focus faltered. When Iguodola and Dalembert turned it up a notch, the Hawks stumbled and fumbled around.

– Trailing 97-95, J.J. dribbled into Philadelphia’s long-armed interior and lost the ball. Jamal scooped it up and missed a 3-pointer. Dalembert then converted what seemed like his 37th alley-oop dunk as the Hawks watched, and finally Josh fumbled the ball away under the basket.

– The Hawks had so many lapses like that. “They played great so give them credit,” Johnson said. “But mentally we just weren’t in the game.”

– Iso-Joe: missed a turnaround jumper, made a 3-pointer, and had the aforementioned fumbled drive. It seemed like Joe used more high picks by Al tonight before probing the defense instead of the usual one-four flat.

– I missed Woody postgame but I’m guessing he used his reserves fairly liberally again tonight because of their re cent solid production. Or maybe he was looking for better effort. Zaza and Mo provided it. Teague only got four minutes but he did a good job of keeping his man from the basket even when he got caught on a couple bad switches.

– The Hawks appeared ready to take control when Bibby’s 3-pointer staked them to a 58-52 lead. But the Sixers responded with a 10-0 run, during which they just found a much higher gear than the Hawks.

– Bibby came to play, at least. He’s starting to come on late in the season. Remember he’s a guy who knows what it takes to make a deep playoff run.

– Just think how much worse it could have been for the Hawks if South Gwinnett High’s Lou Williams (back) had played. He’s yet another high-energy guy who can expose the Hawks when they are nonchalant.

– I figure the Hawks won’t have an energy issue against the Pacers on Sunday, if only because they are back at Philips. Looking at the schedule, you now have to wonder about those games at Detroit and Washington in the final two weeks.

– I’m out, Hawks fans.

MC

140 comments Add your comment

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
1:06 am

Look at the quotes. And ya’ll think I’m crazy about my opinion about this team?

O'Brien

March 27th, 2010
1:16 am

northcyde,

We dont think you’re crazy. We just think that you should not think that we are crazy because we expect better from the Hawks.

The sixers had won 11 or 12 games at home all year, their coach had called them out for not showing any leadership on the court, Sports illustrated mentioned them as teams that have cashed it in.

So is it too much to expect the Hawks to take care of business? Now we are basically 2 games behind the Celtics for the 3rd seed.

MC,

Based on the type of team that gives the Hawks trouble, Cleveland fits the bill. They will exploit the switching defense, and they are an athletic team too. We should be trying to avoid them at all costs.

I think we have a better chance at beating Orlando in 7 games…

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
1:18 am

[FROM PREVIOUS BLOG]

Big Ray:
I don’t wish Wdsn to be fired either. It’s like you said recently,
him being fired means we were unsuccessful in the play-offs.

As for predicting: I fear they will attempt to gracefully let him go.
That’s where the fireworks begin. Wdsn will come unglued/snap/go postal;
you name it, but grace will be nowhere to be found.

I sincerely think he ‘Must’ win ‘2′ play-off series to be re-signed.
Two series? Does that put us in the Eastern Finals? Brain cramp!

I blog for fun [hobby]. No strokin’ out here.
My career equaled stress x googleplex.
Now that I’m retired, I’m mellow.

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
1:25 am

At least Big Al tells the truth. ["We overlooked 'em"]
Top notch talent/top notch team. Not ‘YET’ elite.

Atlanta Fawks

March 27th, 2010
1:33 am

“I feel like we overlooked (the Sixers) and that’s not the right thing to do. If you do that in this league any team can beat you.”

Yep! And that is whats going to happen first round of playoffs. This team should be past this point from all the hype two years ago. Didn’t happen. Or was the goal to be 4th in eastern conference? I feel like we are the 90’s Kings. All that talent but no one really gives a S*IT!!!

Maavelous

March 27th, 2010
2:08 am

I wasn’t as maavelous as usual tonight, but you pimple faced computer geeks know you love me anyway. Ain’t I a handsome stud or what? Imagine a night with me.

Look at the bright side, kids. When we do the one and done playoff thing, we can all forget hoops and work on our golf swings. Of course mine already is simply maavy. Toodles.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:28 am

They simply believe ( like most of the fan base ) that they’re better than what they really are. Even if the coach tells them that they have to work on a nightly basis, the team ( whether consciously or unconsciously ) feels that they can just flip a switch, start playing well, and everything will be OK.

LOL . . . Woody should forbid any of them from reading a newspaper or listening to their friends and family.

you so crazy

March 27th, 2010
2:32 am

“And I know some of you don’t like me telling you how to feel or act . . . but the minute some of you just simply ACCEPT the Hawks for who they are . . and not WISH for them to be something else . . your life as a Hawks fan will be so much easier.”

Just accept us for who we are and your blogging life will be so much easier.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:34 am

And we’re not going one and done in the playoffs . . . lol. If we play Miami, they definitely won’t overlook them, seeing that we were in a battle with them last year. D-Wade will try to will them to victory though. They’re the biggest threat to us, but we should be able to close them out in a series.

Milwaukee can’t beat us 4 out of 7 games.

Charlotte could, if they played all 7 games at home. But they can’t win on the road.

Toronto’s defense is too horrible to win a playoff series.

So I’m not worried about the Hawks in the 1st round. At worst, we’ll be in a situation like what we put the Celtics through 2 years ago. But Game 7 is in our building, and none of those teams, except Miami ( and only because they have a superstar ), could win a Game 7 in Atlanta.

farcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:34 am

“They simply believe ( like most of the fan base ) that they’re better than what they really are. Even if the coach tells them that they have to work on a nightly basis, the team ( whether consciously or unconsciously ) feels that they can just flip a switch, start playing well, and everything will be OK.”

TRANSLATION – THE TEAM AND THE FANS ARE IDIOTS, WOODROW IS THE ONLY PERSON WORTH KEEPING AROUND. WATCH OUT, GENIUS MIND AT WORK.

i lika do da cha cha

March 27th, 2010
2:37 am

Atl needs a real center who can block shots thats all there is to it. Trade that power forward they keep callin a center.

his momma

March 27th, 2010
2:38 am

cha cha, great post! You are absolutely right!

weirdcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:40 am

“LOL . . . Woody should forbid any of them from reading a newspaper or listening to their friends and family.”

Communist alert.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:42 am

The fans aren’t idiots. Just unrealistic at times. Wishing this team to be “elite”, isn’t going to make it happen. The Hawks are what they are. A very good team. A mentally tough team. But a team who can easily lose focus on the road.

very good + mentally tough – lose focus = 50+ win team ( see Atlanta, Utah, Denver, Phoenix, etc )

i lika do da cha cha

March 27th, 2010
2:44 am

Blame Sund! he uses a fake center at center and wont get a real one!

i lika do da cha cha

March 27th, 2010
2:44 am

who is woodrow? what position he play?

i lika do da cha cha

March 27th, 2010
2:47 am

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:49 am

There are the 7 teams in the NBA who have a winning record on the road, listed by their Defensive Rating and their road record.

Boston: 2nd . . . 24 – 13
Orlando: 3rd . . . 22 – 15
LA Lakers: 4th . . . 21 – 14 . . although they’re shaky as hell on the road lately
Cleveland: 6th . . . 26 – 12
Oklahoma City: 7th . . . 20 – 15

See a pattern?

The other two are Dallas: 14th . . . 22 – 14 and Portland: 15th . . . 19 – 16

The Hawks actually rank 12th in defense, but our road record is 17 – 19 . . . and a good chunk of that has to do with our poor defensive rebounding and our poor transition defense.

Gotta bring that defensive intensity, if a team wants to win on the road.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
2:49 am

OK . . I’m done. You kids can have the blog now.

Najeh Davenpoop

March 27th, 2010
3:00 am

“And the Hawks’ 19 turnovers were due to poor focus against an athletic, scrappy team that tries hard. The Hawks can be twice the team if they always added those last two traits to their talent.”

The Hawks should know. Four years ago, they were an athletic, scrappy team that tried hard and occasionally beat superior teams by forcing turnovers.

BONE

March 27th, 2010
3:04 am

NORTHCYDE IS A FUCIN LOSER LOOOOOOOOOOOOL

BONE

March 27th, 2010
3:05 am

GET A LIFE YOU ACT LIFE THE HAWKS ARE YOUR WORLD LMAOOO, WHAT A NERD

Najeh Davenpoop

March 27th, 2010
3:07 am

“Wishing this team to be “elite”, isn’t going to make it happen. The Hawks are what they are. A very good team. A mentally tough team. But a team who can easily lose focus on the road.”

If “losing focus on the road” is what keeps this team from being elite, that’s unacceptable. It’s not like the Lakers or Cavs were born with an innate ability to focus better. Maintaining focus on the road is just a matter of paying attention. It’s not a talent. Jason Kapono will never jump as high as Josh Smith, but nothing stops either one of them from focusing. There is nothing stopping the Hawks from maintaining focus. If that’s actually the reason, we would be idiots not to hold them accountable.

The only thing keeping the Hawks from being elite is that they don’t have Cleveland or LA’s talent. That’s why nobody expects them to win 70 games and the championship. But it is perfectly fair to expect them to maintain focus on the road and beat an inferior team, especially when playoff seeding is on the line. And the fact that Denver and Phoenix can’t focus on the road doesn’t make the Hawks’ lack of focus any more excusable. Those fans have every right to be disappointed in their respective teams in that regard as well.

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
3:09 am

northcyde:
sometimes I think what you and others forget, is, it’s not about
how good individual players are, or can be.
It’s all about the ‘team’. Yeah I know, I’m old fashioned, but the
day that ‘team’ ceases to be the central focus & individual skill
exceeds the complementary performance for the greater good,
then I’m out.
Therefore, the Hawks have plenty of skilled players.
Whether or not they can fuse into a balanced organism with the
‘WILL’ of a champion, I do not know.
Do they have a player/players with said ‘will’ & drive, we have
yet to see.
Is Wdsn capable of managing his team through the intense pressure
and scrutiny of the play-offs? Perhaps Mr. Sund is looking for the answer to that query. I hope Wdsn has the chops to pull it off.

Najeh Davenpoop

March 27th, 2010
3:12 am

Like I posted on the previous blog, if you look at the Hawks’ schedule, they probably won’t go any better than 7-3 over the remaining 10 games. If that happens. they need the Celtics to go 5-5 or worse in order to take the 3rd seed. Looking at the Celtics’ remaining schedule, the chances that they lose more than 4 games over that stretch are pretty slim. If the Hawks had won this game, they would only have to gain one game on the Celtics down the stretch, which is a much more manageable goal.

So yes, this loss matters, and yes, we have every right to be disappointed and hold the Hawks accountable for their lack of focus.

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
4:55 am

Things are slow out on patrol.

Najeh ,

Excellent points, as usual.

Grandad ,

My sentiments exactly. Woody must be judged by the playoffs (this time with a healthy team) and the performance therein. The Hawks will probably win north of 50 games. That is an improvement, but it isn’t the entire body of work, and it’s not what management will judge him by. In fact, winning more than 50 games may be diminished in light of the injuries we suffered last season. With much better health and more firepower, it’s possible that 50+ wins is exactly where we should be (and may have been last season), making this season’s playoff performance the real deciding factor, or at least something that will not receive the pass it got last season. We shall see.

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
4:57 am

I don’t want to concede the 3rd seed to the Celts just yet, but as Najeh points out, it requires a subpar effort on the part of the Celtics, and a near-herculean effort on the part of the Hawks at this juncture. And that can be blamed squarely on losing focus (or whatever we’re calling it these days) in games we had no business losing. It is what it is…

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
5:39 am

You mean 2 tell me we lost 2 a team with out LOUIS WILLIAMS AND THADDEUS YOUNG and with 26-47 record that them hawks.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
5:57 am

MARVIN 6 points with only 3 shots taking again M.I.A what role do marvin have on the hawks.
1.Is he a offensive rebounder ? no
2.Is he a deffensive rebounder ? no
3.Do he score for avg ? no
4.Do he play good deffense ? avg
5.Is he a leader ? no
6.What is he, what role he play ? like billy knight would say, i dont no lets wait and see.
7.Marvin 5th year in the nba still have no identity.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
6:07 am

Why is it so hard 2 try somthing new if a player is not performing you have 2 recognize that as a coach and try somthing different, o whale i guest woody want be back next year waiting for the next star 2 come by.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

cdbgolf

March 27th, 2010
7:38 am

Hawks fans,we will look back at the regular season and wonder why we didnt secure the 2nd or 3rd seed.No need to look further than this,3 l’s to the Nicks,one big L to GS after having an 18 point lead,O.T. loss to Dallas after having a sizeable lead in the 4th qtr,and losing to Toronto at the buzzer after having that game in control. and last night,losing to a pitiful Philly team.You guys see the pattern here?The Hawks dont have what it takes to close teams out in the 4th qtr.

wordy

March 27th, 2010
8:50 am

maybe they miss their mommy when they aren’t at home. Way to suck all yea on the road!

NCBravesFan

March 27th, 2010
9:10 am

If you look at the past two games, you’d rather win both obviously – but in terms of the big picture (the season will ultimately be judged by the playoffs, not the regular season), I’d say you’d rather win against Orlando (if you’re not going to win both games).

My guess is ATL will play very well in the playoffs – but I will be very surprised if they get past the second round. A combination of not enough depth, not enough focus – and from the looks of things from this casual fan’s perspective, not enough coaching.

Mr. Turnip-Green Jeans

March 27th, 2010
9:20 am

Teams that pick and choose when to play hard never go anywhere. You need TRUE professionals, who bring it EVERY NIGHT, to scale the highest level. This team has not, and will not, ever reach that point.

We’ll be one-and-done in the playoffs, just wait and see…

[...] Michael Cunningham writes about the Sixers’ effort and the Hawks lack their of: Nothing illustrated the Hawks’ effort issues like Philadelphia’s 58 points in the paint and 28 fastbreak points. Not hard for the Sixers to shoot 50 percent with all those easy points. And the Hawks’ 19 turnovers were due to poor focus against an athletic, scrappy team that tries hard. The Hawks could be twice the team if they consistently added those last two traits to their talent [...]

lewis

March 27th, 2010
9:47 am

i like marvin a lot and I want him to be the best he can be, but he along with woody probably need to go next year. Evans plays twice as hard and puts up the same numbers at 32. disappointing. Mo Evans and Joe Smith and Al Horford want to win a championship, but they have little control over it…..Josh Smith does too but until he stops walking so much on the court and giving it all he’s got every game, i can’t call him dedicated. Van Gundy and M Brown can say whatever they want because they have a disciplined team who knows what coach says goes, no matter what. Everytime a Hawks player makes a miserable play, Woody just does that staring thing, probably because he doesn’t feel like getting in a fight with a team that doesn’t seem to listen to or respect him. Woody would be a great assistant coach.

listen now or listen later, dont matter to me

March 27th, 2010
10:31 am

“58 points in the paint and 28 fastbreak points. Not hard for the Sixers to shoot 50 percent with all those easy points.”

i lika do da cha cha

March 27th, 2010
2:37 am

Atl needs a real center who can block shots thats all there is to it. Trade that power forward they keep callin a center.

his momma

March 27th, 2010
2:38 am

cha cha, great post! You are absolutely right!

listen now or listen later, dont matter to me

March 27th, 2010
10:33 am

“58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint,”58 points in the paint “58 points in the paint

listen now or listen later, dont matter to me

March 27th, 2010
10:49 am

“Wishing this team to be “elite”, isn’t going to make it happen.” it takes personnel. The Hawks need a C E N T E R.

Joseph Allen McWhorter

March 27th, 2010
11:07 am

I love this article and it makes great sense. It seems like the Hawks have so many problems winning on the road even against weaker teams due to a lack of focus and energy and playing at a higher level. They have so many wins in their home arena at Philips because they have the big crowds getting into the game to help give them that needed spark. The Hawks have go to learn how to take that same high energy level and focus on the road and play the same way. And, until they figure out how to do that and produce a lot of wins on the road, they will still be a long way from the league with the Cavs and the Lakers. Those teams play at a high energy level every night they play a game no matter who it is against or where the game is played!

NEED TO KNOW .....

March 27th, 2010
11:22 am

HEY WHAT TIME IS THE HAWKS INDIANA GAME IT IS SUPPOSE TO BE AT 3:30PM BUT I AM HEARING 7PM WHAT IS IT DOES ANYBODY KNOW…….

O'Brien

March 27th, 2010
11:51 am

@northcyde,

Your view implies that because other teams are doing it (Denver, Phoenix, Utah etc), then we should understand when our team does it (struggles on the road, loses focus etc). Who cares about those other teams? I only care about the Hawks.

There is no excuse for losing focus this late in the season. Like Woody says, what gives them the right? Have they won 50 games? Won a division title? Been to the ECF? No. These Hawks have accomplished nothing.

The Pistons used to think they could turn it on and off, but that was after winning the NBA championship, and reacing the ECF on multiple occasions. And they found out the hard way in the playoffs that they couldn’t.

I agree with northcyde though, that I dont see the Hawks losing a first round series no matter who the opponent is, because we will have 4 games at home. However, whoever it is, we need to put them away early so we can rest for the second round. And I would hate to see the injury bug bite us this late.

@Grandad,

I think for Woodson to be retained, the Hawks must play well in the second round, and they must win at least 2 games in the 2nd round.

The Hawks won 47 games last year with Flip, and they dealt with injuries. This year, we added Crawford (SMOY), we have been the healthiest team in the NBA all year, and we will improve our win total by 5-10 games. I’m happy for the Hawks, but there would have been no excuses if they did not improve on last year’s record.

And as for the game last night, although I blame the players for their horrible performance and lack of energy, my impression is that Woody did nothing to hold them accountable. Why not give the bench more burn in the second half?

Maybe that would have lit a fire under the starters behind. And even if you lose with the bench, the starters would have gotten the message that their lack of focus will not be tolerated (like when Bobby Cox pulled Andrew Jones in the middle of a game).

Because we dont want these kind of games to be a recurring theme this late in the season. But instead, Woody just lets the starters do what they do, and hope they will play better.

Section 303

March 27th, 2010
11:55 am

NEED TO KNOW, the game tomorrow tips at 3:30PM. I’m not sure why the TV commericials kept saying 7:00PM last night.

Tough loss. This team is still up and down. I still do not trust them on the road. I do not know if sparse crowds have anything to do with it. That might be a factor, I guess. I tend to think it is more a maturity issue. When you read quotes like “we thought we could turn it on in the 4th quarter”, I think it shows a team that thinks it is better than it really is. The Hawks are really good, but few teams are good enough to just roll out of bed and beat another NBA team, especially on the road.

Reall, not sure any team in the league right now is good enough to do that.

NEED TO KNOW .....

March 27th, 2010
12:01 pm

what time is hwks game sunday

NEED TO KNOW .....

March 27th, 2010
12:02 pm

thanks section 303

kwooden1

March 27th, 2010
12:07 pm

The HAWKS will always struggle in games that they don’t bring a lot of energy because they really can’t easy points in the paint. Horford and Smoove really work hard in the post but neither has the moves to get easy shots. Also, for the last few games, at least one of our main scorers has been completely off. Clearly Cleveland and Orlando are better at this point, but the season isn’t over and we have a lot of room for improvement.

GO HAWKS!!!

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
12:19 pm

kwooden1 is a REAL fan. He understands that we are still LEARNING HOW TO WIN. REAL fans appreciate where we are. Having a top ten record means something. I know we are struggling to close out games, but the POTENTIAL is there. Marvin is going to show his UPSIDE when the playoffs come. Even though I have don’t know all my bosses because it’s eight of them, I do know they are happy. We have IMPROVED every year. Rome wasn’t built in a day. Getting to the second round isn’t so bad.

Wabe

March 27th, 2010
12:33 pm

I didn’t get to catch the game last night, but was pretty damn bummed to hear we lost to the sixers. This is the inconsistency that I’ve come to expect from this team. They play up or down to the level of competition.

They just beat Orlando on WED night, but turn around and get beat by a bad sixer team. We have no business losing these games, but we still do. It sucks because we were just talking about how mentally tough the Hawks were a couple days back, but then they pull this last night?

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
12:39 pm

If Josh continues to HIT those JUMPERS, Marvin continue his CONSISTENCY and finally Mike Bibby continues to play his HIS USUAL SMOTHERING DEFENSE we will accomplish our goals. We wanted to win 50 games and play A LITTLE BETTER in the SECOND ROUND. You fans should realize that we are PROUD TO GET TO THE SECOND ROUND. Maybe you fans EXPECT too much. You all should be like BIG RAY and BIG DAVE who are SATISFIED with where we are. BIG RAY and BIG DAVE accept us for what we are and that is an UP and COMING force in the NBA. Hope to see you all tomorrow for Kid’s day at Phillips and remember CHIK FILA FAMILY NIGHT is on wednesday when we play the LAKERS.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
12:44 pm

From O’Brien

Your view implies that because other teams are doing it (Denver, Phoenix, Utah etc), then we should understand when our team does it (struggles on the road, loses focus etc). Who cares about those other teams? I only care about the Hawks.

There is no excuse for losing focus this late in the season. Like Woody says, what gives them the right? Have they won 50 games? Won a division title? Been to the ECF? No. These Hawks have accomplished nothing.

I only mention those other teams to dispel the notion that this has something to do with coaching. The coaches know what the problems are. But when you see a team play like we do, it’s almost always about the players.

Jerry Sloan stays on his players about this. But they do the same thing we do. Look at the quotes from them:

“They played excellent in the second half . . . Our defense was non-existent. They did a great job getting people open and they got on a roll. We couldn’t shut them down. I was disappointed in our energy level in a game as important as this. I didn’t know if they need a memo to tell them where they are.”" – Jerry Sloan

That’s a future Hall of Fame coach saying that about his team.

I list those other teams, because this phenomenon isn’t unique to Woody, like everyone wants to believe ( not necessarily you ). Even with you saying that he could’ve played the bench more, do you mean play the bench as in play Teague? Because Craw, Evans, and Zaza got burn in that 2nd half. Smoove played the entire half, but mainly because he was the one who had it going in the 3rd quarter.

- Mo played 8 minutes in the 2nd half, and didn’t take a shot
- Zaza played 5 minutes in the 2nd half, and didn’t take a shot
- Crawford was erratic, but made 2 of 5 shots in the 4th quarter

Joe Smith gave us nothing in the 1st half. So I guess you mean that Teague should’ve played in the 2nd half.

Oh . . one other significant thing about the 2nd half . . . JJ ( uncharacteristically ), got to rest for almost 7 minutes. Maybe if Woody played him like he usually plays him, we pull the game out.

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
12:44 pm

Don’t worry about that loss Wabe. It can happen on any given night. Remember it’s not about necessarily WINNING A CHAMPIONSHIP, it’s about being considered ELITE. Being elite is based on REGULAR SEASON, not the playoffs I can’t wait to give Joe that MAX MONEY HE DESERVES. He’s quite a SUPERSTAR, ALWAYS MAKING BIG SHOTS.

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
12:51 pm

Northclyde is exactly right. Woody isn’t to be blamed for what happened last night. Woody has done a GREAT job with his bench this season. They give us PLENTY of production. We trust Woodson’s coaching style. He knows his personnel and if he wants to play his starters 48 minutes, then that’s his business. Northclyde knows that it TAKES TIME to build a championship. He is one of those SATISFIED fans that we need. Real fans should never CRITICIZE the team, just be HAPPY with the fact that we are ELITE and 20 GAMES over 500. ELITE TEAMS don’t necessarily have to WIN ON THE ROAD, Good for you NORTHCLYDE!

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
1:04 pm

@ Section 303

Lack of Maturity. I think you win the prize sir.

I think that’s one of the reasons why JJ usually tries to take over the game in the 2nd half, when we’re on the road.

It was interesting to see JJ defer to others almost the entire game. Then it was interesting to see how much the other guys turned the ball over trying to do what JJ does on a nightly basis.

19 turnovers. 10 by our starting frontcourt alone. Only 13 shots by JJ ( 8 going into the 4th quarter )

It was a recipe for disaster.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
1:33 pm

LOL @ Rick . . . you need to call a “Players Only + the GM” meeting, and tell the Hawks that they are the HUNTED now. The way we get jacked up for Boston, is the way these “lesser teams” get jacked for us now . . . especially on their home floor.

Rob G. (ATL Homeboy) _ (San Diego)

March 27th, 2010
1:39 pm

My opinion on the Hawks:

First of all, I am glad the Hawks are having a better season compared to last season, thus far. Although, there’s been many, nice victories this season. I am compelled to say the least that the Hawks aren’t showing enough fire to convince me that they can surprise the world and win a championship. They have too many weak links in their arsenals to convince me otherwise. For example:

The jury is still out on Marvin Williams, each and every game I wish for Marvin to at least make me feel comfortable as to why he was garner at such a high pick from North Carolina the year they won the NCAA Championship. I keep wishing to find in the games I have watched of the Hawks the last five years to reinforce this preconceived notion, that Marvin is going to be this bona-fide player with the necessary skill sets that makes him almost as far as physical dimensions the mode of Lebron James. I realize this is setting the bar pretty high, but how can you go wrong with this picture in mind.

I don’t wish to criticize Marvin, it is not my nature to criticize anybody or anything in life (it is just not fair to the person of conversation). Although, I wish to rant and rave about some of the things I see in his game from afar, something is holding back from making a real honest opinion about his game or lack of game; part of the reason is: He would only be in his first or second year had he prolonged his career in school. Normally, a player starts to feel comfortable right around the third or fourth year, unless you are truly in the class of, just to name a few: Kobe, Lebron, Dewayne etc.

So on this note, I cannot harbor ill feelings toward Marvin, but only hope he can become the X-factor as the Hawks move forward in their bid to become a very elite team such as the Lakers and Cleveland, who are, the way things are looking are going to be playing in the finals (it’s quite obvious) if you area true fan of the game. At this point, I would start utilizing Mo Evans instead of Marvin. Mo brings a little bit more to my likings to the Hawks (points, rebounds, heart and energy). I just thought of the reason Marvin isn’t excelling like he should. At this point with all the potential Marvin may have….I think it may have to do with….he doesn’t have the heart just yet. My Take.

Another weak link: Za Za P. like Marvin doesn’t bring it every night, and I have studied Pachulia very carefully over the last five years. The first year I was very happy with his grit, but since then it almost like, I would rather have someone like the Bird Man out of Denver who brings it every time I watch Denver play ball.

What is the purpose of having: Jason Collier, Randolph Morris. Playing pick up ball in the San Diego area, I am nearly not as young or tall (5′ 11″ born in the 60’s) as them and still receive more praise then these two. Two wasted roster spots in my opinion.

Jeff Teague: I can’t form an opinion yet. It appears he has some game. Hope I don’t get disappointed like Acie Law, after doing my homework on Acie and finding out he wasn’t the answer the Hawks had envision.

Joe Johnson: As much as I am happy for him coming over to the Hawks and doing such an incredible job for them. There is still something missing in his game I haven’t being able to put a finger on. I keeping trying to compare him to the big three (Kobe, Lebron and Wade) and I can’t. I am hoping whatever it is will come out during the playoffs. Good luck Joe!

J-Smoove: Very big improvements considering him coming out of high school and all, and improving each and every year. The all-star game is in the near future, I need for Josh to continue to improve as he is doing and continuing to practice his jump shots as this is probably the weakest part of your game thus far. Continue to practice like Jordan did and you and your game will be unstoppable like the aforementioned big three. I need Marvin to do likewise.

Mike B. – The veteran, how can I say anything negative about Mike other than what is obvious as you become advance with maturity (I didn’t want to mention age). Steady leader every since the Hawks became your second team (I remember the years with SAC Town) very memorable indeed. I think you still got something left in tank….hopefully this year….like that playoff series….year ’s past….you know which one. Good Luck!

Al Horford – I can’t comment at this stage. I haven’t a clue what is your position. Al does show heart and grit.

Sixth Man of the Year – Jamaal Crawford: Mentioned to my brother back in the ATL to watch out, because you are a baller. I wish you and Joe was a tandem on the starting five, but that wouldn’t work necessarily, because you still would need a field general (Bibby) to run the offense. And I need your scoring for the second team, other than Mo Evans, there isn’t anyone else.

Mike Woodson – Good Job! although I know the bounty hunters are out for your head.

These are some of the reasons the Hawks will not win this year. There are way too many question marks.

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
1:44 pm

I LOVE the core I have helped keep.

The guys are YOUNG and have POTENTIAL. I plan on keeping this starting 5 together for 7 more years.

ALL that matters is that we win 50 games — that’ll show IMPROVEMENT over last year.

Woodson is a TOP defensive coach, a true genius at shutting down players like Nate Robinson and John Salmons. I will offer him a $100 million/6 year extension after the season, making him the highest paid coach in NBA history.

Woodson’s rapid development of Teague is just astonishing. Just yesterday, a successful Eastern Conference GM contacted me that he believes Teague is already better than Isiah Thomas!

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
1:45 pm

Our goal last year was to make the playoffs with a winning record.

Our goal this year, realizing that the Miami series was a fluke, is to make the playoffs with a winning record (CHECK) and to win ONE game!

southcyde

March 27th, 2010
1:46 pm

“They simply believe ( like most of the fan base ) that they’re better than what they really are. Even if the coach tells them that they have to work on a nightly basis, the team ( whether consciously or unconsciously ) feels that they can just flip a switch, start playing well, and everything will be OK.”

TRANSLATION – THE TEAM AND THE FANS ARE IDIOTS, WOODROW IS THE ONLY PERSON WORTH KEEPING AROUND. WATCH OUT, GENIUS MIND AT WORK.

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
2:36 pm

Northclyde why should we call a players only + gm meeting. Don’t you realize that we are about to EXCEED last years win total. Look at our record with 10 games left. All we have to do is go 500 the rest of the way to get that MAGIC NUMBER OF 50 (or should I say 51) to be an ELITE team. Two years ago against Boston we were trying to SHOCK THE WORLD. Now we will OWN IT when we get to the SECOND ROUND and win ONE game. With Woody using his bench as much as he does in the 1ST HALF of games, our guys will be well rested for the playoffs. So come on out and watch Joe “ISO-SUPERSTAR” Johnson, Marvin “UPSIDE” Williams, Mike “THE DEFENSIVE ARCHITECT” BIBBY, JOSH “PURE SHOOTER” SMITH, and AL Horford. What you will see is a team that may not win every game, but plays HARD for 48 minutes and is MENTALLY TOUGH especially when on THE ROAD and when they have 4TH QUARTER LEADS. Come watch Mike Woodson draw up MAGICAL-ISO plays coming out timeouts, as well as our GREAT SWITCHING DEFENSE in which Mike Bibby sticks to his opponents like GLUE. This is why we are going up on ticket prices and not offering season ticket holders parking passes. GO Hawks!

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
2:52 pm

RICK SUND bring in ROGER BELL now, he just been release by goldenstate, and in our system he would fit perfect with the switch deffense that the play.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
2:58 pm

Just like boston brought in finley and milwaukee brought in stack house, bringing in ROGER BELL would make the hawks better, he is a vocal leader he is a shut down defender on the perimeter plus he is a hard nose player that bring that toughness that we so desperately need come playoffs.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
3:02 pm

Truth Serum:

You’ve been watching Erin Andrews, haven’t you? Cha cha cha.

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
3:03 pm

ROGER BELL remind me of bruce bowens who use 2 play with san antonio, who can shoot the 3 and play good defense.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
3:06 pm

ROGER BELL STARTE DAY 1 MOVE MARVIN 2 THE BENCH AND MAKE THE BENCH DEEPER.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
3:06 pm

northcyde:

Now you’re saying Joe is pulling a “Kobe”;
to teach the young guys a lesson.

darrell starks

March 27th, 2010
3:09 pm

STARTER BIBBY, JOE, ROGER BELL, JOSH, HORFORD.
BENCH JAMAL, MOE, MARVIN, JOE SMITH, ZAZA.
RESERVE TEAGUE, COLLINS
STREET CLOTHES WEST, MORRIS.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Mrs. Woodson

March 27th, 2010
3:10 pm

You fans are always complaining about Coach Woodson. He didn’t put this team together. Do you think he would have selected Marvin over Chris Paul? Do you think he wanted an all brawn no brains JS over J Chills? Shelden Wms? He has to coach these misfits. A no heart superstar JJ. The slow earthmover Bibby? Hard hands Zaza? No. What coach could get this team to 50 wins other than one who should be considered COY.

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
3:14 pm

darrell starks:

Raja Bell would not be eligible for the play-offs.
This summer considering him:
*NEGATIVES/CONS
1. age
2. too much money to sign [probably]
3. would need to be the *piece that puts you over the top
* you & I agree, that needs to be a ‘Big’
4. Roger mason better alternative

* All work for summer.
* Right now, “what you see is what you get” ‘Flip Wilson’

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
3:33 pm

Mrs Wdsn:

You are correct, he would not have selected Marv or C. Paul.
He would have traded that pick for ‘Bibby’ & not waited until 2008.
You’re probably right he would have shipped off JS & re-signed Chldrss.
On Sheldon Williams he would have traded that pick as well;
loving veterans & ex-Pistons [he's got a ring, you know]* Dumars would have traded him Rick Mahorn for the SW pick, Wdsn forgetting that RM has
long since retired. Darn it!
*[for carrying Larry Brown' clipboard]

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
3:34 pm

“It was interesting to see JJ defer to others almost the entire game. Then it was interesting to see how much the other guys turned the ball over trying to do what JJ does on a nightly basis.”

I wonder if it’s also been interesting to watch the team win games in which Joe doesn’t “do what he does on a nightly basis” ? What was JJ doing when we beat Orlando? Shooting 5-17. What was JJ doing when we beat San Antonio? Shooting 8-23. What was JJ doing when we beat Charlotte? Shooting 7-21. What was JJ doing when we beat New Jersey by 24 points? Sitting the game out, recovering. How about against Washington? 18 points on 8-19 shooting (not really bad). How about against Golden State? Shot 3-14 and scored 10 points. Against Philly? 6-13, 18 points. Against Chicago? 5-15 shooting.

Okay, that covers all the wins in the month of March, except one, wherein JJ shot 10 for 15. That’s a total of 8 wins, out of 12 games played.

Let me put this plainly and factually, so there will be no confusion. We have won 8 out of 12 games with Joe Johnson shooting 67% in ONE win, 46% in ONE win, 42% in ONE win, and LESS THAN 33% in the other FIVE wins.

And before we talk about his nice assist numbers, which have been very helpful, allow me to point out that he has averaged 4.6 apg for the month, which is about average for him anyway. For the month, he has shot 40.9% and averaged 19.2 ppg.

Now I seem to recall some people scoffing at Jamal Crawford for similar numbers. The point is NOT that JJ is a bad player, he’s a GREAT player. And I am not even coming close to bashing the man. He’s our best player, he’s our team leader.

But this TEAM has won down the stretch, late in the season (in March) at a .667 clip with it’s best player clearly struggling to maintain all-star form. JJ is having his worst month, unless I miss my mark.

What’s interesting is this team’s ability to OVERCOME that, where other teams would be breaking even at best.

JJ deferring? Give me a break. Compare shot attempts and see who is still taking the most shots (and he SHOULD be). But don’t ignore the FACTS. And don’t act like Joe carries this team ALL the time, while his teammates bumble about, hoping one day to be good enough to hold his jock strap.

rant off …..

Ah So Joe

March 27th, 2010
3:49 pm

Keep Marv and trade the rest. They are all ball hogs except Marv who sleeps through most games. I need that max contract from the Nincompoopabockers and that means at least 10 more shots a game. Baby needs new shoes.

Grandad

March 27th, 2010
4:21 pm

Big Ray:

I agree on everything except 1* tiny part.
Joe – We MUST re-sign, cannot replace! [indispensable]
Jamal – has suppressed his game for the TEAM. [my opinion]
*Al – Leader
*That is the 1 tiny point I had in mind.
I feel like Al is becoming the leader of this team.
**With Josh as his ***wingman.
****Not a knock on Joe…quiet, subtle, humble, subdued, introverted,
even somewhat bashful.

bigdave

March 27th, 2010
4:30 pm

“how much the other guys turned the ball over trying to do what JJ does on a nightly basis.”

im not 100% sure whats meant by this but i agree to an extent. however, i dont think its the players faults. if we had clear… defined roles on this team, and a system that clearly defines court behavior i think we would see a lot less of this… everyone has a “go” to imitate his teammate in his own way.. it might be a low risk offense but it lacks discipline.

Ray…

i think Joe’s aggressiveness regardless of his percentages account for a lot of “what we do” (a Mike Woodson staple). he has to be accounted for, and in my opinion he has to force the issue in order for us to be successful. high volume shooter b/c he takes them in high percentage areas. i dont think our offense or talent can afford for Joe to take a night off offensively.

JeJe

March 27th, 2010
4:38 pm

LOL. The headline on AJC Hawks says we must play the “Slumping Pacers.” They have won 5 in a row. Good job, writers!

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
4:55 pm

Grandad ,

I don’t disagree with any of that.

bigdave ,

I agree completely. There is a lack of discipline on the offensive end, but an abundance of talent overcomes it in most cases (or else we wouldn’t be sitting at 46 wins).

I also agree that Joe’s aggressiveness and how he plays has a LOT to do with our offense, and our success. I am NOT denying ANY of that, in fact I went so far as to mention that Joe SHOULD be taking the most shots. He’s our best scorer, period. I’m just emphasizing that this team is talented and versatile enough to win games, BIG games, without JJ shooting or even scoring all that well.

Of course Joe has to be accounted for. But when he IS accounted for by opposing teams (gee, that might have something to do with this low shooting percentage), other guys are getting enough done to compensate. There was a time when this team was done for if JJ got shut down or had a bad game. That time is past, and some people need to see that. I never take credit away from Joe. I can’t say it enough times: he’s the best player on this team, and we would really like to re-sign him.

But I also don’t think it’s up to the team. It’s up to Joe and his agent whether he stays or goes. I doubt Sund tries to low-ball JJ when free agency begins. Doubt that very much.

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
4:56 pm

We FIRMLY believe this is the best team in the NBA.

I was watching clips of the 2002 WCF the other day, reminding myself that Bibby STILL is the MOST ATHLETIC and best DEFENDING point guard in the game. We believe he is in EXCELLENT SHAPE, and that Chris Paul will seek his guidance come this summer.

Best,
Rick

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
5:00 pm

Grandad ,

I think the change in roles and the leadership coming from other guys (guys other than JJ) is unnerving for some people. I don’t know why. Many of us complained about Joe not being a type A personality and highly vocal leader. We were told to shut up and quit wishing the guy was something he’s not.

Then vocal leadership and leadership in other places (like defense) began to emerge from other guys (Al, Josh), and strong opinions began to be voiced (like Al calling out the guards for not moving the ball around, and even suggesting that he can’t do much to help on offense if he doesn’t get the ball enough). All of the sudden, some want to start comparing stats, even obscure ones. What gives?

It’s not ok if you don’t like that Joe isn’t a vocal, passionate leader, but when others step into that role, that’s not okay either. Whatever…. I actually like that Al and Josh are stepping up their games AND their leadership to compliment/supplement Joe’s leadership and game. It results in what should be a balanced product on the floor, and more balanced expectations from fans. I think some people really don’t like that, and want us to see Joe as a “head and shoulders above the rest” kind of guy. Like I said, whatever…

smh

March 27th, 2010
5:02 pm

If you let northcyde tell it then its never Joe’s or Woodrows fault. Its everybody else, those 2 are the untouchable. Joe and Woodrow can do no wrong in northcyde’s eyes. Seriously dude, are you related to these cats or just love riding their laps.

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
5:02 pm

There is a reason why this team proved to be better than the Miami Heat in the playoffs last year.

Because, and I quote Astro Joe , the sum is greater than the individual parts. That’s why a team like this is better than a team that features one player who is greater than any on our team.

Rick Sund

March 27th, 2010
5:04 pm

“There is a reason why this team proved to be better than the Miami Heat in the playoffs last year.

Because, and I quote Astro Joe , the sum is greater than the individual parts. That’s why a team like this is better than a team that features one player who is greater than any on our team.”

Brilliant, Ray! We need more precocious and intelligent fans like you!

mark

March 27th, 2010
5:40 pm

a couple changes keep ah js jt jc zaza get a new coach, try to get Rudy gay. and Elton brand coming off the bench. new lineup jt rudy gay js mw ah. bench zaza eldon, bibby jamaal mo evans and fillers. byron scoott the coach.

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
6:08 pm

from Grandad

Now you’re saying Joe is pulling a “Kobe”;
to teach the young guys a lesson.

I don’t know. But it did look similar to what Kobe had to do in order to shut people up about him not passing enough ( including his coach ). Except Kobe went to the extreme, and didn’t look to score AT ALL for a half. At least JJ took open shots, he just didn’t force the issue like he usually does. I think JJ was simply gaving the other guys the opportunity to “shine”.

All I know is that JJ should NEVER be taking 13 shots in a game, unless we’re getting blown out or blowing someone out. A lot of people are under the assumption that we should be a totally balanced team in which everyone contributes equally. The facts are that all of our guys don’t shoot well enough, nor can they create their own offense well enough, for that to be a reality.

Smoove excels in transition offense and when he can go early. Once in the halfcourt offense, his game dramatically decreses from an efficiency standpoint.

Horford, when he tries to go one on one, is a far less efficient player, than when he’s being set up by other people.

So is Bibby. He needs to be set up as well.

Marvin . . . he’s either totally inactive, or simply missing shots

And Crawford can do what JJ does . . he just take real bad shots even when he’s off.

I just think that it’s interesting that we were turning the ball over left and right, when other people tried to assume a larger role in the offense.

cdog

March 27th, 2010
6:27 pm

IT’S A SHAME THE HAWKS CAN’T BEAT A MIDDLE SCHOOL TEAM.THEY MIGHT AS WELL PACK IT IN FOR THE VSEASON. WHEN YOU LOSE TO PHILADELPHIA, WHO ELSE DO THEY EXPECT TO BEAT?

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
6:52 pm

Big Ray . . . those wins when JJ was struggling, shows the mental toughness of the team. Something I’ve been saying for a while about the Hawks.

It comes down to people knowing their roles. JJ’s main job on this team, is to score the basketball and secondarily, to set people up. The team, for the most part, know their roles, which is why they’ve been able to overcome adversity for much of the season.

As long as everyone play their roles on this team, we’re going to be OK on most nights. What we DON’T need, is JJ deferring to other guys down the stretch of games, unless they’re wide open off of one of his passes. That’s what he did last year in the playoffs, with Flip missing all of those shots in the 2nd half. That can’t happen again.

Make no mistake . . . if we’re to do anything in the 2nd round of the playoffs, we’re going to need the superstar version of JJ to show up. Not JJ the “team guy who only scores 18 points”. We’ll probably need the superstar version of Crawford as well, so that they’ll be a 1 – 2 punch. Offensively, those are the guys that have to get it done for us.

Defensively, it’s going to be all about Smoove and Horford, especially on the boards. Asking them for increased production offensively, is asking them to go out of their element as players. But they can excel, and the team will be OK, if they dominate the boards. And if they really hit the offensive boards like they have all season, that’ll be an extra bonus come playoff time.

Blast

March 27th, 2010
7:01 pm

Don’t think Joe pulled a “Kobe”, I think the entire team pulled a Houdini and simply disappeared. You could see it right from the start. Joe still scored twenty, didn’t he? The team played with no energy, no emotion, no hunger.

They cannot take Indiana for granted either. Only good thing about that game is that Hawks play at home.

kwooden1

March 27th, 2010
7:06 pm

Granger just scored 44! last night. The HAWKS better be ready to play some defense, because Indiana destroyed Utah and they would like nothing better than to do the same thing to the HAWKS! The HAWKS always have trouble with Murphy because of his ability to shoot the 3 and Brandon Rush seems to do well against us. I think Marvin and Mo should do most of the work on Granger, which should give JJ a chance to rest on defense and work his magic on offensive. I’m OK with Bibby on Watson, if Bibby comes to play! If Crawford brings his A game off the bench, then I think we should be able to take care of business. But Smoove has to stay with Murphy and guard the rim! Horford is going to have his hands full with Hibbert. Woody might consider putting Smoove on Hibbert and letting Horford guard Murphy. I really don’t want Smoove leaving the paint with Granger in his current groove, we have to keep him on the perimeter. I actually think the switching defensive should work “Ok” against Indiana, because most of their offensive is Granger. If we can limit his touches and keep him out of the paint and off the foul line, we should be successful. BUT, if Bibby keeps switching off of his man and Watson gets to play against Horford or Smoove most the night, we will LOSE!!! Mark my works!!

GO HAWKS!!!

GO HAWKS!!!

kwooden1

March 27th, 2010
7:08 pm

Mark my WORDS!!! Got too excited!

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
7:25 pm

northcyde ,

I can’t argue with that. The team is mentally tough (when they’re mentally in the game), but I also say it’s talent. Guys can know their roles all they want, but until they develop their individual games to greater heights, and it translates to on-court production, you can tattoo their roles on their bodies and it still won’t matter. This team is seriously talented . We’ve got two all-stars, a Sixth Man, and another who shoulda/coulda been named an all-star, and that’s just four guys we’re talking about. Mentally tough? Yep. Talented and versatile? You bet. With Joe shooting as badly as he was, how did we manage to score 119 points against the Spurs, of all teams? Talent and versatility, along with mental toughness.

In fact, I AGREE that Joe can’t defer so much at times in the playoffs, the way he did to Flip. But I don’t know if we’ll agree as to why he did it.

Dude has been to the playoffs before, and in some very intense games, back when he was with the Suns. Of course, he wasn’t the top guy/headliner/main attraction, and that team was more balanced and in better tune (by far ) offensively.

I know he was hurt during last year’s playoffs, and I think his deferring had something to do with not only being less than 100% physically, but our lack of offensive diversity. That, and he drew every double team there was to be had. Flip was as much of a security blanket for Joe as he was for Woody, especially when Bibby couldn’t get much going. Watch, they will lean on Crawford the same way, but they must include Josh and Al for this to work to it’s best potential.

Oddly enough, Josh Smith averaged more points than Joe did in the playoffs, despite the fact that he was still playing inefficiently, and outside of his own strengths. Imagine what he can do for this team THIS time around, playing within himself, and doing what he knows how to do best.

Similarly, Al Horford has shown himself to be reliable in many games, even in late game situations. He has been able to make plays and get us buckets when those millions of jumpers just aren’t falling.

I’m not saying take the ball out of JJ’s hands when the chips are down, or give our bigs all the shots. In fact, I’d leave the ball in JJ’s hands. And Bibby’s. And trust them to know when to give that ball up to Al, Craw, or Josh. Trust them to involve those guys, who will also then play with even more energy on the defensive end. You have to reward your bigs for the hard work they do on everybody’s behalf on the other end. Especially when they can get higher percentage baskets as the opposing team locks down your perimeter shooters.

Again, I’m not asking that we take the ball out of our best scorer’s hands. But good teams win when they have other options, and make use of them. Versatility. Talent. We’ve got it. We have to use it.

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
7:27 pm

Hell, Joe has it better than ever (well, not as good as he did in Phoenix). He doesn’t have to rely on Flip anymore, a journeyman gunner.

He’s got Crawford, Bibby (healthier and hopefully hitting his shots), and now Al and Josh. Mo Evans has stepped up as well.

Big Ray

March 27th, 2010
7:27 pm

Blast ,

You’re right. It wasn’t Joe’s fault. The team failed to play defense and got outhustled, end of story.

BirdDawg

March 27th, 2010
7:32 pm

Although their effort the other night was pathetic, I think the coach has to bear the brunt of a lot of that. You’re looking at a tired team, physically and mentally. When you have overworked starters combined with an underused bench over 71 games, that’s what you’re going to get. This team came out of the gate like gangbusters at the beginning of the year and slowly but surely, they started to trail off at the end of the year. That is fatigue. And Joe has been overworked for years now under Woodson so it would stand to reason that he is off of his All Star form at times. It explains why Josh Smith, who seemed to have constant energy at the beginning of the year, often walks from point A to B on the floor at this point in the season. The bench players are tired of being used as building decorations and the starters (and Jamaal) are just plain tired.

Hawk n the Ham

March 27th, 2010
7:32 pm

I think someone swapped the Red Bull with Sprite Zero.

Clyde

March 27th, 2010
8:13 pm

Anyone notice how Woody ran Boris Diaw out of Atlanta but treats Marvin Williams like his son?

FIRE WOODY

rusty

March 27th, 2010
8:16 pm

yeah northcyde i would like to see jj dribble for 18 seconds force the shot over 3 defenders,pass the ball to js or mw 20 feet from the basket with 2 seconds on the cloak or throw the ball away. yeah i would like him to take at least 20 shots he might make 8, he will get to the line 2 times. when other super stars shoot 8 for 23 they usallly make 10 of 13 free throws. yeah i like to see every body stand around & see no ball movement while joe has fun.

Clyde

March 27th, 2010
8:20 pm

Hey David McDavid

Buy the Hawks with your 281 million dollar judgement. The Spirit group is broke and they don’t know what the hell they are doing.

FIRE WOODY

Ken Strickland

March 27th, 2010
8:29 pm

The Hawks will always have long running DEF lapses as long as Woodson continues to force the team to play his beloved switching DEF. How can Woodson watch subpar teams shred his beloved switching DEF, and all he does is complain about the players not doing a ggod job of playing DEF? Hell, what kind of DEF can he reasonably expect from our centers and PF’s when they’re consistently forced to defend opposing PG’s, SG’s and SF’s from taking them off the dribble from the top of the key? What kind of successful DEF can anyone but a fool expect from Bibby and Crawford, with them being matched against C and PF’s under the basket?

IF WOODSON IS TOO STUPID OR STUBBORN TO MAKE A NEEDED DEF ADJUSTMENT OR CHANGE AT THIS POINT IN THE SEASON, HOW CAN WE EXPECT HIM TO MAKE A NEEDED DEF ADJUSTMENT DURING A 4-7GM PLAYOFF SERIES? We have too many areas of vulnerability to be a serious title contender, and most of them can, but won’t, be corrected by Woodson, like:

(1) Not relying so heavily on the switching DEF, especially when it’s so blatantly obvious it’s hurting us.

(2) Take control of the OFF during crunch time and insist the players controlling the ball and the OFF run the plays and maintain ball movement. THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR WOODSON ALLOWING JJ TO CONSTANTLY DISRUPT THE OFF AND BALL MOVEMENT WHENEVER HE DECIDES HE WANTS TO GO ISO.

(3) If Woodson sees teams constantly getting into the lane and beating our DEF, he has to get it through his thick stubborn head that leaving PG MBibby in the gm and having him switch off on the opposing teams Bigs ain’t the damned answer.

(4) While a lot of you insist on claiming JTeague isn’t ready to run a team, he’s sure as hell capable of playing a lot better DEF than MBibby or JCrawford.

Since Crawford and/or JJ usually dominate the ball and run ISO’s during crunch time, it would make a lot of sense to play Teague during those times to iliminate any DEF weaknesses. C-Horford, PF-Smoove, SF-JJ, SG-Crawford and PG-Teague. If they try to double JJ or Crawford, that gives us Teague and either JJ or Crawford with the ability to effectively penetrate off the dribble.

WOODSON JUST DOESN’T THINK OR RESPOND TO CRITICAL OR EVEN OBVIOUS SITUATIONS WITH ANY SENSE OF URGENCY OR UNDERSTANDING. HE JUST SITS BACK AND ALLOWS THINGS TO TRANSPIRE AND THEN BLAMES THE PLAYERS IF THE RESULTS ARE UNFAVORABLE. A HC HAS TO BE AN ACTIVE AN VIABLE PARTICIPANT IN THE PROCESS THROUGHOUT EVERY GM, JUST LIKE THE PLAYERS.

Blast

March 27th, 2010
8:34 pm

I hear ya, Big Ray. Just calling it as it is. Hawks didn’t look to be so interested last night. Shame, really.

rusty

March 27th, 2010
8:36 pm

right on ken

sam;l

March 27th, 2010
8:46 pm

I now believe the Hawks are beyond our ability to control. All we can do now is sit back and watch the games. Oddly enough, no one has any idea how successful they will be.

SWAT Native

March 27th, 2010
9:18 pm

I hated the loss too, but I think the Hawks got a dose of their own homecourt advantage. They probably got in early the night before and hit the Philly nightclubs and were tired for the game, just like other teams do when the come to Atlanta. They also took Philly lightly, and the Sixers saw a chance to show that they can play after all. It really was a trap game.

I still say you have to put this loss in context. If you looked at their week at the beginning, with San Antonio, at Milwaukee, Orlando, at Philly and Indiana, I would have said they would be doing well to win three. They still have a chance to do it if they beat Indiana tomorrow, which won’t be as easy as some might think (they’re hot right now).

Take a toke and pass it on

March 27th, 2010
9:41 pm

“THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR THERE’S ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR Michael Cunningham ALLOWING Ken Strickland TO CONSTANTLY DISRUPT THE blog pageWHENEVER HE DECIDES HE WANTS TO GO ISO”

JeJe

March 27th, 2010
9:47 pm

Ray and Northcyde seriously have no lives. Go outside

O'Brien

March 27th, 2010
10:53 pm

Ken S,

I agree with you on Woody and his lack of adjustments, but the problem with having Teague in the game on offense is he is not a good jump shooter. So thats one less guy the opposing team has to worry about on offense. I think thats also the reason why Mario only gets spot minutes, because his offense is shaky.

Now if Teague is in the game, and they let him initiate the offense, thats a different story. But if all he is going to do is hand off to JJ or Crawford, and get out of the way, it will not help much.

@northcyde,

“The team, for the most part, know their roles, which is why they’ve been able to overcome adversity for much of the season.”

Coming off a year in which they won 47 games, and dealt with injuries (mostly to Josh and Al), the Hawks added SMOY Crawford and Joe Smith, and they are on pace to win 5-10 more games than they did last year. Plus, they have been the healthiest team in the NBA.

So please tell me what adversity the Hawks have overcome?

Steven A.

March 27th, 2010
11:16 pm

I just saw Dikembe Mutumbo and Dale Davis playing pick-up basketball..
RICK SUND, you need to call these guys! AND, while you are at it,
please FIRE “cornbread Collins’” and clueless Randolph Morris, PLEASE….

northcyde

March 27th, 2010
11:20 pm

LOL @ JeJe . . half of the stuff I post on here, comes from my phone while I’m at work.

@ O’Brien . . . well let the fans and the sportswriters tell it, everytime we go on a 2-game losing streak, or lose a game vs a bad team, the Hawks are doomed and aren’t going to do anything worth watching.

Then they bounce back and always get things together.

So while the only REAL adversity they’ve faced, was after the Nate Robinson debacle back in January, this team has played well most of the year ( even if the fans say we’re merely a mediocre ballclub ).

Smoooooth

March 28th, 2010
12:51 am

Readin’ these posts cornvinces me we haf th’ dumbess fans in th’ histo’y of baxetball, ah reckon. IsoldJoe ain’t fit t’polish mah shoes, the gunner. Shoot, pass the ball ya ballhog to THE MAN WHO IS SMOOOOOOOTH, ya fool. I am the greatest since Ali.

Grandad

March 28th, 2010
1:50 am

Big Ray:

From earlier in the evening – well said x 2 or 3.

Marcus

March 28th, 2010
7:55 am

well, 2 goals were to snag 50 Ws and be above 0.500 on the road:
Well 50 wins is within reach ……. but with our debacle in PHL (standing at 17-19 on the road), we need to go 4-1 the rest of the way with the following AWAY schedule:
@ CLE, @ CHA, @ DET (2nd nite of back2back) @ WSH (2nd nite of back2back), @ MIL

Think the thing is …… we have fallen prey to 1 – 2 things that have contributed to probably 5-10 Ls that could have been Ws:
1. Malaise esp. vs. bad teams and/or small crowds (HOME and AWAY)
2. 4Q swoon precipitated by rushed/questionable shot selection and lack of passing

I think we all see it and are pi$$ed that it continues … despite our elevation in the East conf. and the fact that this year we were expected to make the playoffs vs. being an up-and-comer

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
10:19 am

TODAY WE GET TO SEE OUR SUPERSTAR DEFENDER MARVIN GIVE UP 35 TO GRANGER AS THE HAWKS WIN BY 1 IN OVERTIME AND EVERYONE ACTS LIKE WE ARE AN ELITE TEAM

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
10:20 am

“LOL @ JeJe . . half of the stuff I post on here, comes from my phone while I’m at work.”

So the other half of the stuff comes from when you are at home?
Ray and Northcyde seriously have no lives. Go outside

terrell

March 28th, 2010
11:28 am

Fire Woody! Bench Marvin!

terrell

March 28th, 2010
11:33 am

JeJe, how do you know Northcyde posts so much, if your’re not on here reading it? Hmm???

Rod from College Park

March 28th, 2010
11:36 am

JeJe,

TODAY WE GET TO SEE OUR SUPERSTAR DEFENDER MARVIN GIVE UP 35 TO GRANGER AS THE HAWKS WIN BY 1 IN OVERTIME AND EVERYONE ACTS LIKE WE ARE AN ELITE TEAM

LOL. And watch these clowns still talk about how much talent and potential he has even though he and Granger were in the same draft. Let’s see how long it takes to put Joe Johnson on him.

terrell

March 28th, 2010
11:52 am

Rod, how many points do you see Marvin having today. I’d say about 7pts 5 reb

terrell

March 28th, 2010
11:54 am

Hopefully he’ll have one of those once out of every 10 games of his, and put up for 30. lol!

Big Ray

March 28th, 2010
12:09 pm

Ray and Northcyde seriously have no lives. Go outside

JeJe…..does your mom still tell you that anytime she catches you using the computer? LOL

Sorry, but we adults don’t have time to go outside. We have jobs. You’ll understand one day. But high school comes first. Now go do your homework, little fella. :)

O'Brien

March 28th, 2010
12:43 pm

terrell,

I wonder if when Crawford reads the blog, he tells Marvin how much we talk about him (negatively)?

Either way, something needs to happen to light a fire under Marvin. Maybe a benching for a couple games, maybe Woody needs to bring him into his office every week, maybe call him out in the media…something, anything, because Marvin can be the X-factor in the playoffs.

I think Granger will get a lot of points, but I think he will have to take alot of shots to get it. And I think JJ will spend time guarding Granger.

UGA

March 28th, 2010
12:44 pm

I thought the Hawks would go 1-3 last week. Beat the Spurs, but lose the games on the road and to Orlando. They went 2-2, so better than I thought.

If they can go 2-2 this week, losing to the Lakers and Cavs, that would be expected.

I’ve thought about what maybe ought to be done in the offseason, but have some ideas assuming we re-sign Joe and Woody. Not saying we will/should be assuming. Here are my dumb thoughts on how to upgrade:

Sign Mike Miller to back up Marvin and maybe even play more than him.
Sign Damien Wilkins to the veterans minimum to take the place of Mario West (Damien can defend and is a better scorer)
Try to unload Mo Evans (I like him) but Miller is an upgrade and shooter
Sign Jermaine O’Neal (he’d be the first big off the bench, not ZaZa)

This is just my idea on what may be able to happen financially, maybe.

Go Hawks, don’t have a let down today.

Ken Strickland

March 28th, 2010
12:57 pm

OBRIEN-why would a so called DEF minded HC use Teague’s poor jumpshooting ability as an excuse to keep him and his DEF ability anchored to the bench? Why would a DEF minded HC insist on playing Bibby, who’s DEF is far worse than Teagues jumpshooting, then stand before the media after the gm and complain about the team losing because of poor DEF? STUPID IS AS STUPID!

There are more ways to score than by shooting jumpshots. When JJ and Crawford go ISO they usually try to penetrate off the dribble, which is Teagues stregth and Bibby’s weakness, and usually shoot jumpers as a secondary option. The ability to limit or prevent the opposition from scoring or scoring consistently is just as effective as scoring yourself, especially if you have the lead. We’ve managed to lose the lead in each of the close gms we’ve lost recently. So DEF, or the lack there of, not the ability or inability to hit jumpshots, contributed to those loses.

You’ve got to stop thinking like Woodson when it comes to Teague and Bibby. Even though Teague isn’t the longrange treat that Bibby is, I’ll be you no team will doubling JJ or Crawford off him. They’re going to do whatever it takes to keep him out of the lane. It’s been a couple of seasons since Bibby’s been enough of an OFF treat to make teams think twice about doubling anyone.

Our best lineup, as far as playing both OFF and DEF, consists of JJ-SF, Horford-C, Smoove-PF, Crawford-SG and Teague-PG. This lineup gives us more speed, quickness, better ball handling, penetrating and on the ball DEF ability, as well as the ability to effectively fight over picks. It allows us to be less reliant of Woody’s beloved switching DEF, while maintaining our ability to score from outside with JJ, Crawford and Horford. I’ll guarantee you this lineup will be less turnover prone, stronger defensively, especially on the ball DEF, while offering more OFF options than ISO Joe and Crawford, or being limited by Bibby not being able to do more than hit longrange jumpers.

Rod from College Park

March 28th, 2010
1:03 pm

terrell,

“Rod, how many points do you see Marvin having today. I’d say about 7pts 5 reb”

This is very hard to predict. No more than 10. LOL.

Eric C.

March 28th, 2010
1:10 pm

CMW will never lead the Hawks to a championship because of games like the Philly loss…what a joke. The Hawks have virtually no shot at the 2/3 seeds now given the remaining schedule. The Heat are closing in on that 5 seed…would rather see the Bucks keep that. In any case, the first series should go seven games and that spells another 2nd round sweep courtesy of the Cavs. I can see why the Hawks are sleep-walking now – why even bother.

o.O-Mac-Town -Macon, Georgia- Westsider-O.o

March 28th, 2010
1:27 pm

The only offensive adjustment woodson has made all year was shaving his eyebrows

O'Brien

March 28th, 2010
1:32 pm

Ken S,

I agree with you that Woody should find ways to utilize the things that Teague brings to the table. I was only giving the reasons why I think Woody would not go with Teague.

Although Woody is a defensive minded coach, his only defense is to switch everything all the time. If you are a good defensive coach, then you should be able to make defensive adjustments. And we dont.

Our defensive adjustment is to get the players to defend better, play harder etc.

We will win or lose playing the same way. Switch everything, all the time, regardless of matchups.

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
1:42 pm

Terrell,

I come here about twice a day and see my screen bombarded by 5 paragraph posts by the resident Hawks geniuses northcyde and Big Ray. These guys obviously have way too much time on their hands. Also, the fact that they post from work all day means they must be doing a pretty pathetic job at wherever they work. Northcyde, in particular, spends his whole life researching useless stats and posting them here, and blaming everything on the players and commending Woodson for being a HOF player.

Big Ray, on the other hand, is just a sardonic scrub, who is 35, lives in his mom’s basement, and doesn’t even go to the games.

Thanks,
JeJe

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
1:42 pm

MARVIN WILL GIVE UP 30 TO GRANGER, HAWKS WILL WIN BY 1 IN OVERTIME AND EVERYONE WILL BE SATISFIED.
THATS WHY THIS CITY WILL ALWAYS BE A JOKE FOR SPORTS

THERE ARE NO EXPECTATIONS — PEOPLE ARE CONTENT WINNING 50 GAMES AND LOSING IN THE 2ND ROUND

O'Brien

March 28th, 2010
1:57 pm

MC,

Could we get the blog an hour or so before game time? That way, we’ll have some new nuggets to comment on before the game starts…

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
1:59 pm

O’Brien,

don’t push MC’s buttons. He seems to get very offended when people make comments about his writing or make suggestions

O'Brien

March 28th, 2010
2:11 pm

JeJe,

MC has been courteous in his responses towards my comments, questions, or suggestions…

terrell

March 28th, 2010
2:12 pm

Who’s content on winning 50, and losing in the 2nd? Not many around here. Why do you think we complain so much. lol! This should be a 60 win team. We’ve lost at least 10 games by blowing 4th qtr leads, or by total 2nd half collapses. We’ve also lost others to teams that didn’t even care if they won or loss. You cant win em all, but you’ve got to win those games if you want to be an elite team. I blame the coach for MOST of these losses.

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
2:25 pm

O’Brien,

don’t talk back to higher authority.

northcyde

March 28th, 2010
3:02 pm

Terrell . . . we should be a 60 win team? Come on now.

That means that the Hawks would basically have to win every single game that they’ve blown . . PLUS . . win all those games that we DID win, but probably should have lost.

The league ( or sports in general ), simply doesn’t work like that. If you want to say that we should have exactly 50 wins right now . . . OK. But 60? LOL . . . then the Cavs and Lakers should have 70 wins, using that logic.

The game like Philly, where we just didn’t come out to play, we shouldn’t have lost.

The games like the November game against a Chris Paul-less New Orleans team, in which that team seemed to hit every outside jumper, we’re not going to win on most nights.

It all balances out.

This is simply how 50+ win teams play.

Mel

March 28th, 2010
3:10 pm

@terrell .. i agree completely. This team should definitely be closing in on 60 wins. Looking at all the games we lost by BS’n we should have the best record in the East or at least there with Cleveland.

Blast

March 28th, 2010
3:19 pm

No game blog?

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
3:30 pm

LOL. Just finished watching the Marvin Show “At Home.” It’s true, people: He does not enjoy playing basketball video games/watching basketball.

Hearing this guy talk, it’s obvious he has no heart or passion to go the extra step. He’s just an average guy who happens to be 6″9

FIRE WOODY

Blast

March 28th, 2010
3:41 pm

Game blog up.

terrell

March 28th, 2010
3:52 pm

Northcyde, I’m talking about 60 wins this year, not 60 wins right now.

terrell

March 28th, 2010
3:54 pm

Marvin just taking up space.

JeJe

March 28th, 2010
3:57 pm

What a pitiful first quarter.

Marvin and Bibby are showing their true colors: useless basketball players who are lost on defense, can’t guard anyone, and who spend more time falling to the ground than actually contributing anything to this team.

Can we please just release Marvin? Seriously. He is a bigger asset to this team not being on it than he is being on it

terrell

March 28th, 2010
4:00 pm

Maybe they’ll decide to cover Rush after his next 3 pointer????

terrell

March 28th, 2010
4:04 pm

We’re just not that good. Can beat anybody, but can lose to anybody. It is what it is.