
J.J. took over in the fourth but faltered late.
– The Hawks couldn’t make a playoff berth official on their second try. Elias Sports Bureau screwed up by telling the Hawks on Friday they could clinch with a victory over the Spurs, but waited until Monday to tell the league “Oops!” The Bulls won tonight so the Hawks couldn’t even back in.
– It’s tough to get down on the Hawks too much after this one. They’ve still won four of their last six. The Bucks are hot. The Hawks played a tough overtime game against the Spurs and arrived in Milwaukee early this morning.
– But just when you are ready to say the Hawks are one of those rolls that might last into the playoffs, they squander a 12-point lead and fall apart at the end in front of rowdy road fans. At least they could say they didn’t have J.J. when that happened at Toronto.
– But he was out there this time, and his Iso-Joe duel with John Salmons in the fourth quarter gave the Hawks a chance. But then Dick Bavetta called him for grabbing Salmons, a play so perplexing I looked up at the scoreboard and figured the Hawks actually had a foul to give.
– What the heck happened there? “I was just being aggressive and trying to deny him the ball,” Johnson said. “But he called a foul. That was at a crucial part of the game. That’s a tough call.”
– J.J. then missed a runner that would have tied it. That was the ninth Iso-Joe of the quarter. He made five in a row at one point but missed the last two to finish 6 of 9. “Late in ballgames, these guys look to me to make plays,” he said. “That’s what I was trying to do.”
– The Hawks could have earned a second chance on J.J.’s miss at 7.9 seconds but Luke Ridnour chased down the loose ball. The Bucks beat the Hawks 11-6 on the boards in the fourth quarter and made 11 of 19 shots. That’s how the Hawks lost despite shooting 53 percent.
– “It was a good effort considering we had an overtime game and then got in late,” Woody said. “We had our chances but we had a bad fourth quarter defensively. We gave up 31 points. We were solid on defense up until then. They got hot, made some shots. We matched shots but we couldn’t get stops when we needed top get them. We couldn’t control the dribble. Everybody just picked and choosed when they wanted to drive the ball.”
– Woody played Joe Smith and Mo 15 minutes and Zaza 10 minutes and the bench guys were effective. So you can’t say he rode his starters too hard but was fatigue a factor?
– “Out starters logged a lot of minutes in the overtime game so coming down the stretch you would think they would start to get a little tired and shots would come up short and that’s what happened,” Mo said.
– The Hawks looked to be in control after they took a 74-62 with two minutes left in the third. Even after Milwaukee started creeping back in it and the fans came to life, the Hawks still looked OK when Mo scored for a 76-67 lead to open the fourth.
– Then Salmons, Ridnour and Carlos Delfino started making shots. “They just turned it on,” Smoove said. “We had them in check pretty much the whole game and then they shots lights out early in the fourth quarter. It was hard to defend.”
– At the same time that was happening the Hawks stopped looking to Al. They were creative in getting him the ball in the first half but, just like at Toronto, they seemed to give up once the Bucks made their entry passes more difficult.
– Another invisible night from Marvin, who only took two shots. Consider his three rebounds and three turnovers vs. Delfino’s 23 points, nine rebounds and five assists.
– The Hawks might see the Bucks in the playoffs. I used to think it would be a tough series for the Hawks but I’m not so sure now. The Bucks play hard and are a good defensive team but for three quarters you could see how the Hawks boast much more offensive talent than the Bucks. Too much for the the Bucks to handle over a series, I think.
– “They play hard. All Skiles teams play hard,” Josh said. “They’ve got a low-post presence who demands a lot of double teams and a lot of shooters on the perimeter. They are a pretty good team.”
– “They’re deceptively good,” Mo said. “You look at their roster on paper and you don’t think they’d have respect. It’s not a team you would say is going to win a championship or go deep in the playoffs but somehow they are still able to contend and earn that respect.”
– I’m out, Hawks fans.
MC
190 comments Add your comment
sam'l
March 23rd, 2010
12:07 am
Looks like the Hawks have 3 back-to-backs after this one.
Looks like the IRS will audit you if you don’t buy health insurance.
Both prospects don’ make me feel so good.
keno
March 23rd, 2010
12:23 am
This team has a glaring deficiency on defense. Every team knows that the Hawks are switching and they know what match up favors them. And as for Marvin, it seems that if the ball is moving, he should be that open guy but it always manages to be Josh. Why is that? Could it be that Marvin does not move well without the ball? Maybe the answer to the Hawks problems is a new coaching staff. I think that Woody depends on Joe too much (and yes, it is Woody that screams out those ISOs and tells everyone else to clear out).
RLP
March 23rd, 2010
12:29 am
With 12 games to go the Hawks need 5 wins to hit the 50 mark. This team is perplexing because I think the addition of Jamal makes the team better than last year by more than three wins. Both Josh and Al are better players this year than last year. Jamal is better than Flip was last year. Bibby and Marvin have both taken a step back. Joe is still Joe but he must learn to trust his teammates which is a new thing for him. From an objective standpoint this year’s team should be much better than last year. But judging on their won lost record they will appear to show only minimum improvement. My analysis is that the team still has not matured enough because at this point they still have a losing record on the road. They have improved their road record but tonight is another example just as the Toronto game of how difficult it is to win on the road. There are only three teams in the East with a winning record on the road and there are only four in the West. Winning road games is one of the true indicators of an elite team.
This season reminds me of the year they improved from 26 wins to 30 wins. The difference is that the future holds more variables because we do not know what will happen with Joe. But at this point I do not want to spend too much time pondering future developments when the final results for this year are not yet in. The team still has 12 games remaining. They could still, theoretically, tie the franchise record for most wins in a regular season just as they could still theoretically fail to make the playoffs by losing their last 12 games. So we have to conclude the regular season and then enjoy the playoffs. There the regular season record does not matter except for determining home court advantage. And that advantage can disappear in one game.
Hawks Fan In New Orleans
March 23rd, 2010
12:35 am
Agreed Sam’l, keno and RLP.
Ree Roe
March 23rd, 2010
12:45 am
I agree with MC’s assessment. I’m not gonna overreact to this loss either. Look, we played a tough road game at one of the hottest teams in the NBA by 3 pts. We’ve played 4 straight 1 possession games in a row and this was the 2nd game of a back to back. I’m cutting the guys & Woody some slack. Good effort guys, we’re still tied for 3rd in the East & have a huge game vs ORL on tomorrow. That needs to be our focus moving fwd. The handwringing & nitpicking over this team needs to end
-REEalist Roe!!
Clyde
March 23rd, 2010
12:51 am
Its all about protecting the paint and the Hawks are one of the worst at it. I’m afraid of what’s going to happen to us Wednesday night vs the Magic.
FIRE WOODY
rusty
March 23rd, 2010
12:55 am
joe gave them that game on a silver platter. that foul was just stupid,what a jerk. his ball hogging in the 4th quarter made our offense come to a halting stop. woody will always let him get away with this nonsance. let him go,please
bigdave
March 23rd, 2010
1:07 am
MC appreciate that link..
…not to try to find reasoning for that foul Joe committed 28ft away from the basket… but Joe likes to take away the space of the opponent.. its just usually you’ll see him do it after the catch. after John starting flailing Joe should have let up a bit… funny thing is the Bucks reach, grab, and hold an awful lot to not have a “elite” player. no complaints about the officiating though, i thought we got a way with a couple of goal tending violations. maybe its just certain match ups that are officiated differently, or players welcome certain challenges. pay close attention to how Dwight is officiated Wed. your best bet is to do your work early against him, but we tend to get an early whistle when this approach is taken. however, when watching the Leprechauns match up against him its a different story.. they’ll let Sheed and Big Perk battle and joust for position all day long and Dwight wont flop..
Wabe
March 23rd, 2010
1:18 am
I’ll be honest, I don’t get why so many people are so high on chasing and/or surpassing the Celtics to get that 3rd spot. We all know we don’t matchup so well against the Magic, so why should we be trying to pass them? It’s a game of matchups, and I think we’d have a much better shot at getting to the ECF going through Cleveland.
As for tonights game, I was disappointed, but not as disappointed as I would’ve been if we had lost LAST NIGHTS game. I still think we haven’t dealt with the 4th-quarter issue. This is something that doesn’t seem to be going away, and it’ll hurt us come playoff time if we don’t figure it out.
keno
March 23rd, 2010
1:18 am
Was that really a foul Joe committed? I have seen defenders give way more contact without a whistle being blown. I have seen Joe receive way more contact than that without a whistle being blown. That was about defensive respect and benefit of the doubt and Joe gets none from the refs. Guys like Bruce Bowen and Ron Artest can do that all game and its called good, hard defense. More importantly, that is not the reason the Hawks lost his game. The Hawks lost his game on the defensive end with the switching and mismatches.
The Truth
March 23rd, 2010
1:29 am
Woody comments during the post-game “We got to go back and look at the film and see what happen”. How many times have we heard that line? Again, how do you define insanity Woody? YOU KEEP DOING AND SAYING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN, ONLY TO GET THE SAME RESULTS. The same switching defense (all the time) with predictable double teams, the opponent baiting Josh to take the open jumper (during crunch time); the ceasing of ball movement that leads to Iso Joe (who can’t resist taking tough shots during crunch time) while our opponents waltzes in for easy put-back may explain why we lose winnable games.
This Bucks win against the Hawks is equivalent to a Hawks win against Orlando going into the playoff. If you could imagine what that win would mean for the Hawks, then you know how satisfying this Buck win becomes to them. You can take this to the bank; they will not fear us in a first-round match-up.
AG
March 23rd, 2010
2:21 am
Good game for the most part. I see somebody in the organization does read these blogs. Somebody mentioned about Marvin always tugging and pulling on that arm brace, but now does not wear it. Also, the Hawks did not make a trade because they know they will only go as far as Marvin will take them. Unlike like last, no other Hawk starter took more than 10 shots, Joe took 27. Marvin, Hortford and Bibby 10-14 shooting. Lastly, I have told everyone, Marvin has to take 10 shots for the Hawks to win. They are 7-1 in March when he took 10 shots (he shot 1-10 in the Toronto loss), 1-1 in February and 3-0 in January. The Hawks are at 8-4 in March, finished 8-4 in February and 9-6 in January. For the season, 16-4 when Marvin takes 10 shots. Marvin is as skilled as Salmons, but he does not have the heart to do it day in and day out.
AG
March 23rd, 2010
2:22 am
This was a big game, a statement game. To beat Milwaukee in the regular season series will be big, along with any other opponent. All will be forgiving with a win over Orlando.
northcyde
March 23rd, 2010
3:52 am
Why do people have a problem with JJ actually playing like a superstar, when his shot is on? That’s what I want to know. If anybody else on the team does it, they’re celebrated. When JJ tries to do it . . he’s selfish.
LOL . . so what’s the REAL STORY behind that?
TheAntiMe
March 23rd, 2010
4:00 am
The defense, for the Hawks seems to go bye-bye for entire quarters at a time. Usually, it seems to happen in the 1st and the 4th quarters. On offense, the Hawks do much better when they get the rock inside.
Of course, most coaches know how to make defensive adjustments and usually do against the Hawks. To counter this, they need to have set plays to run for Al and Josh to get the ball inside.
(The Hawks have done this as an ad lib play on their own in the past where Josh will act like he’s cutting underneath to the left side of the floor but stops a couple of steps from the basket and cuts toward the hoop for a wide open dunk off of a pass from Bibby.) Especially if the opposing team’s defense is going to double J.J.
I can’t complain too much about the offensive lapses because the Hawks are still one of the more efficient offensive teams going but those defensive lapses just are causing them to give too many games away that they seemingly had locked up.
Alabama’s governor Riley
March 23rd, 2010
5:31 am
I wish people stop living the lie that Al’s lack of offense is the problem we we dont win. Al’s 14 points a game come from the fact that jj and Crawford shoot so well that it opens up the middle for horford who is unable to create his own shots or draw double teams like JJ and Crawford.
When the Horford nutt huggers are planting wet kisses they never mention his defense, because they cant. Defense wins basket ball games not 14 pts agame. Play some freaking defense in the middle and the hawks win. Just that simple. When ever the hawks lose check and see, you will find we were outscored in the paint 99% of the time. As clear as that is its amazing the the nut hugging posse call 14pts a game all star material. That funny. Why dont you tell me about his block shot average? How many shots he’s altered? Who hes put on the seat of their pants? THAT’S WHAT WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS, NOT TRYING TO MAKE 14 PTS INTO 15!
1
Big Ray
March 23rd, 2010
5:50 am
It was a tough game on the road against a good team that has been hotter than any other since the all-star break.
At the same time, they had to employ the same tactics that other teams have been beating us with.
1) Play zone, because we will respond by jumpshooting ourselves to death.
2) Make passing into the post difficult a few times in a row. We’ll give up and start jumpshooting ourselves to death.
Marcus
March 23rd, 2010
6:02 am
@wabe,
yeah the 4Q issue is still there. Seems like we can’t get 20 pts. or more to wrap up a win.
JustaThought
March 23rd, 2010
6:41 am
Well it’s getting close to the end of the season, and I think you hawk fans are just starting to either realize or see this team is not what you thought it was or was going to be by this time………
The Real Hawk
March 23rd, 2010
6:48 am
Are we going to get out of this funk of losing to teams that seem to want it more than us? Especially when they have worse records.
Back to the coaching!
joBjo
March 23rd, 2010
7:16 am
free throws cost the Hawks this game. Hawks were 6 for 13.
joBjo
March 23rd, 2010
7:18 am
Hawks lost the battle of the boards too. Bucks 49, Hawks 44. counting team rebounds.
SWAT Native
March 23rd, 2010
7:30 am
Like AG said earlier, make up for this tough loss with a win over Orlando tomorrow night. I would gladly make that trade.
Grandad
March 23rd, 2010
7:32 am
Sybil, your [-]basketball IQ amazes me.
O'Brien
March 23rd, 2010
7:40 am
Good game by Joe. Considering he missed some games for his Achilles, and has picked up basically where he left off, says a lot. Hawks need to resign Joe.
That being said, if that was Josh who committed that foul against Salmons, people would be quick to jump on Josh. Joe has to do a better job of not getting a foul called in a tie game down the stretch like that.
I won’t be too hard on the guys though, because we’ve played 4 close games in 5 nights, against playoff teams.
Disappointments from the loss;
1) Free throw shooting. You can’t go 6-13 in a close game against a good team on the road and expect to win.
2) We didn’t go to Al Horford enough in the 4th. He was 5-5, we saw what he did against the Spurs in the fourth quarter, and he also had a good fourth quarter against the Raptors. But just like in the Toronto game, down the stretch, Hawks did not find a way to get him the ball enough.
3) Nothing from Marvin. This guy is so up and down, I don’t get it.
4) Hawks had 4 more FG than the Bucks, but the Bucks were +4 in assists, and +7 in rebounds.
5) fourth quarter defense. Playing back to back, maybe our tired legs was a contributing factor though.
Two Special Requests:
Can somebody please tell Woody that teams are taking advantage of the switching defense? Even Ridnour was making shots over Al Horford. The switching has been abused by the Bobcats, Spurs, and now the Bucks. Adjust Woody, adjust.
Can somebody please tell Josh to stop taking those long jumpers (unless the shot clock is under 5 seconds)? What was he doing posted up by the 3 pt line on that pass from JJ? Same thing against the Bobcats, he was posted up by the 3 pt line for the last shot. He should be on his way to the paint.
Hawks need to beat Orlando just to get over the mental hump though.
Willie Coyote
March 23rd, 2010
7:40 am
Another come-from-ahead loss
terrell
March 23rd, 2010
7:59 am
Just imagine if Teague had commited that horrible foul on Salmons. Wow! Woody woulda tore him a new one. That foul basically lost the game. Come on Joe, your’re better than that.
terrell
March 23rd, 2010
8:02 am
The season is almost over, and people are still telling the old stubborn one to adjust. Please!
terrell
March 23rd, 2010
8:05 am
Anything from the sf spot woulda got us a victory. Marvin was a NO-SHOW. Again. How can you score 26 one night, and 2 the next?
JeJe
March 23rd, 2010
8:12 am
So if we don’t resign Joe, we are screwed? We cannot go over cap by signing outside free agents. SIGNING JOE OR S&T JOE IS ONLY CHOICE
JeJe
March 23rd, 2010
8:14 am
WHY DO WE STILL SWITCH ON DEFENSE? WHY DO WE SWITCH HORFORD ONTO MANU GINOBILI?
Nacho
March 23rd, 2010
8:23 am
If you scratch below the surface of Woody, you really don’t find that much in terms of coaching.
Nacho
March 23rd, 2010
8:23 am
That foul by Joe was stupid!
Section 303
March 23rd, 2010
8:25 am
Michael,
I had the same thoughts. I was afraid of the Bucks series, too. Not anymore. I think the Hawks will be able to outscore that team when they have to. Plus, in the playoffs, there will be no more back-to-backs.
If I have one concern, however, it is Solmans. He has become a Hawks Killer.
terrell, get off Marvin’s back. Really, how many chances did he have? Crawford took things over in the 2nd-3rd, and it was all Joe in the 4th. Marvin has been playing well. I think some on here just look for reasons to bash him.
AG
March 23rd, 2010
8:38 am
Why is anyone complaining about Hortford? Do the math and look at my other post. Marvin is the key. Two shots? I know Joe is our man, but even Jordan had his Pippen. JJ’s game is much better when teams are not doubling etc. Coach has to see what is going on and make the adjustments – so when Marvin took off last night, he should have played Mo 30 min.
lewis
March 23rd, 2010
8:41 am
good game. starters played too many minutes. josh smith waited too long to be aggressive. marvin williams looked great taking it to the paint twice then he got scared and didn’t touch it. Marvin just isn’t good at running around on offense and getting open, he’s hardly even a distraction. I think he’s one of the tougher players on defense and to defend, he can wear down other teams when he wants to, but where is his heart? Joe and Jamal looked great today, needed a little more out of Josh and Marvin. Al is Al, he could be one of the best PF in the league. We throw Zaza at center. Marvin becomes a more agressive scorer and defender and stays at PF. Josh comes off the bench until he learns to do more than just block shots on D.
lewis
March 23rd, 2010
8:43 am
err ^^ SF
tidog
March 23rd, 2010
9:04 am
@ lewis, josh come off the bench until he learns to do more than block shots. Maybe u are from the planet Zendron and haven’t watched the maturation of josh smith this season. When the shot blocker is on the bench who blocks the shots?
MsDee
March 23rd, 2010
9:06 am
For once, I will not blame Joe for this loss but what I would have changed about the last shot is for Joe to have taken the shot much quicker than just dribbling the time down just to go base line for a very difficult shot with not enough time to really get the rebound or to foul in time for another chance at scoring. I remember that NY game when NAte was playing for them and if I’m not mistaken, that game went into OT also. It was about 14 sec left in the game and NY was down by 2 or 3 points. Instead of Nate holding the ball til the last posible sec, Nate IMMEDIATELY ran in to score the ball for a 3 point play. What he did was, he scored QUICK unlike Joe. We already didnt have another timeout left so Joe really should have tried to score quickly to give us enough time to either get a rebound for a put back or to foul early to get the ball back. I believe if we had a little more time when Jamal attempted that last shot, he probably would have made it or been a better looking shot because of more time on the game clock.
Tim
March 23rd, 2010
9:09 am
Someone please explain something to me. Why do NBA teams use “getting in late” as a challenge to playing the next day (as Woodson did when referring to last night’s loss). These guys grow up playing basketball all day long, and now they find 80 minutes of basketball (and that’s if you’re Joe Johnson) in 24 hours a challenge?
MsDee
March 23rd, 2010
9:12 am
Oh and Joe made a bad foul on Salmons, not a good decision at that time in the game but other than that, Joe played like an All-Star/Super Star up to that point in the game. He made great shots in the paint and he should have taken the last shot. If that was Wade, LeBron, or Bryant scoring the way Joe did in the 4th, they would have definely taken the last shot as well. And speaking of those players, when they take those same shots and miss them, their fans screams down their necks as well of their blogs so I guess that comes with the territory of being a elite player in this league.
tidog
March 23rd, 2010
9:21 am
@ Tim, when is the last time your body has exerted the type of energy a NBA player body does over week. We are fragile humans and our bodies get tired. Athletes bodied are better tuned for heavy exertion more so the joe blow the traveling saleman and it tires. It requires rest.
Kitis
March 23rd, 2010
9:29 am
The free throws and 4th qtr D is what cost us this one. Other than that, not a bad showing all things considered. Marv needs to play with an attitude to be effective like he was against SA.
I just don’t get why Woody needed to call a timeout with 21 seconds left. So he could draw up an Iso-Joe play? Saving that TO for another possession (like after Ridnour missed his second FT) would’ve been HUGE in giving us a much better look to tie the game.
PMC
March 23rd, 2010
9:32 am
Lets just get 50 plus wins in the next 12. I don’t really care how that happens at this point.
O'Brien
March 23rd, 2010
9:34 am
Tim,
The 85 minutes of basketball is a challenge, but one big reaason they were tired is because of the travel built in (flying to Milwaukee, getting in late, only a few hours of sleep, then practice). if they played both games in ATL, it wouldn’t be so bad.
MsDee
March 23rd, 2010
9:42 am
Well, that comes with the territory of playing in the NBA. All those guys know there are many back-to-back games and ‘in 1 city 1 night and in another city the next night’. That is no surprise for these guys. Its up to the coach to allow the main guys to get enough rest by playing the bench more. Teague didnt even touch the floor last night. Again, the coach needs to rest his players more, esp on a back to back night.
MsDee
March 23rd, 2010
9:45 am
Maybe Joe fouled Salmons because he was tired!! If you notice, he was basically laying on the guy while trying to deny him the ball. Joe dont always make mistakes like that..Woodson should have sat him most of the 3rd so that he would have been fresh in the 4th.
Hawk n the Ham
March 23rd, 2010
9:49 am
Like MC said, you can tell the Hawks are a different level than the Bucks, even though they lost energy in the 4th (which is understanding from the last 2 OT games).
Let’s talk Orlando! Phillips needs to be RAWKIN tomorrow night!
Tim
March 23rd, 2010
9:55 am
I’m not talking about my body, I’m talking about an athlete that is paid millions of dollars to be in world-class shape. I agree basketball requires more athleticism than most sports, but there are athletes (soccer comes to mind) whose performance wouldn’t be hindered from 80 minutes of a stop and start sport in 24 hours.
Andy
March 23rd, 2010
10:08 am
Two nights in a row Joe Johnson has missed a game winning or tying shot. Yet he thinks he is kobe and lebron. He’s not even Bosh. This is why this team will lose to Milwaukee in the first round. Joe is an overrated joke.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
10:15 am
Clyde,
about this:
“Its all about protecting the paint and the Hawks are one of the worst at it. ”
I’m not denying that we don’t defend the paint all that well. But this was NOT the game to complain about that. Here’s a link to the shot chart:
http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart?gameId=300322015
LOL, if the chart is right (and I’ve found mistakes on occasion) then the Bucks hit TWO SHOTS in the paint the entire game!
At least complain about defending the middle when we actually DO have trouble in the middle. This time that was NOT the problem.
vava74
March 23rd, 2010
10:17 am
The most strikingly stupid event of the game was Woody wasting his last TO to call a ISO play which did not even involve a pick or any decoy movement by Jamal.
Just a simple clear out ISO play.
Why did he waste a TO for that? To give enough time for Milwaukee to rest and focus on the inevitable ISO play?
This has been standard procedure with Woody: the Hawks have the ball following a miss by the opponents and instead of capitalizing on that fact – since following a miss a team’s spirit goes down and the nerves go up – he does the opposite: gives the adversary the opportunity to re-group and we take no advantage since there is no actual designed play drawn up from our side.
Then, the fact that it was our last TO makes it a stupid decision beyond belief.
Rod from College Park
March 23rd, 2010
10:48 am
Lewis,
“marvin williams looked great taking it to the paint twice then he got scared and didn’t touch it. Marvin just isn’t good at running around on offense and getting open, he’s hardly even a distraction. I think he’s one of the tougher players on defense and to defend, he can wear down other teams when he wants to, but where is his heart?”
His heart is with the wizard of oz. He’s one of the tougher players to defend huh. I guess that’s why teams don’t defend him. LOL
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
10:56 am
Truth-serum said this:
“When the Horford nutt huggers are planting wet kisses they never mention his defense, because they cant.”
I guess he’s forgotten this:
northcyde posted stats a couple of weeks ago that showed (at that time) that Horford gave the fewest points to the opposing center per 48 minutes of ANY center in the league.
That’s right. Numero Uno.
Shocked? northcyde and I both were stunned. I knew Al was solid, but I wouldn’t have guessed HOW solid.
Of course truth-serum can’t believe it. But, as he’s been known to say:
“The numbers don’t lie”
No center in the league gives up FEWER points to his opponent per 48 minutes than Al Horford. In the past week he’s TWICE blocked a 7′ players’ shot and we got the ball.
Inconvenient for those with an anti-Horford agenda. Kinda like Horford being named to the All-Star team.
Oh, that’s right…….it was a conspiracy by the head coaches of the league to make us THINK that Al is an All-Star so we won’t get another center.
LOL, isn’t that how the theory goes T-S?
Section 303
March 23rd, 2010
11:06 am
Andy, really? You want to be held to that going into the playoffs?
I’m going to hold you to that. Joe is a joke. We’ll see. Make sure you come on here when he carries this team to wins in the postseason. I guess you must have missed last Friday’s game?
Section 303
March 23rd, 2010
11:08 am
Andy, one more thing…I watch basketball. I’ve seen Kobe and LeBron miss plenty of last second shots. They don’t make them everytime, either. Just when they do, everyone has to glorify it so much…makes it seem like they always come through. They don’t.
JCC in MKE
March 23rd, 2010
11:20 am
I enjoyed the blog comments and the game last night. It’s refreshing to read intelligent comments. I’ve been hoping the Bucks match up against the Celtics in the playoffs because there’s bad blood between us and the Hawks present us with difficult match ups, but I changed my mind last night as the Hawks are a lot more fun to watch. With Dick Bavetta reffing you never know…anyhow, I’d like to think the fans at the Bradley Center made the difference. We are a rowdy bunch, mainly because we haven’t had much to cheer about for years. JJ kept making shots and shutting us up until the very end. The playoffs are so different from the regular season: no back to backs, coaching adjustments, maybe a little looser refereeing…anyhow, if we do meet in the post-season, I look for a close and very entertaining series. Oh, it isn’t wise to underestimate John Salmons.
JOE
March 23rd, 2010
11:32 am
Marvin invisable again….
S Hawk Fan
March 23rd, 2010
11:38 am
Woody has to be fired!!!!!
CoreyWilson
March 23rd, 2010
11:48 am
The Hawks are simply NOT properly utilizing the talent thats on the roster. Marvin (the invisible man) can do a whole lot more, particularly when he comes off the bench. Williams should IMMEDIATELY be demoted to the bench. Bibby (the over-the-hill veteran) can do much more particular when he is coming off the bench. Bibby should IMMEDIATELY be demoted to the bench. Start Mo Evans in place of Bibby. Start Jamal Craford in place of Marvin Williams. With that starting lineup; Mo Evans, Joe Johnson, Josh Smith, Jamal Crawford and Al Horford, I think those changes makes the Hawks a more potent team capable of winning more games. I would also give the rookie Teague more playing time because he needs to gain enough nba experience in case we need to call on him in the playoffs, provided Bibby is going stale. If you make those changes when you ring the bell to make substitutions to bring in Bibby or Marvin, they will come into the games fresh and bursting with energy and will play more passion and with more energy. I believe making those subtle changes will make a major difference in the Hawks and the results will be dramatic. If those changes dont get made immediately, line woody up in front of a firing squad and fire the guy.
sam'l
March 23rd, 2010
11:56 am
It is interesting that the Hawks have “not made the playoffs again,” but that’s not the story. The story here is that the Hawks are now showing individual excellence on a number of levels and still are capable of losing to an aggressive team. I think that if Woodson really did tell Marvin to “play centerfield” for that play just before the half of the San Antonio game, where Marvin intercepted a half court inbound pass the ball and made an electric buzzer beater…if Woodson really did tell Marvin that, it was an example of one instance of “excellent coaching.” One blogger insists he hears Woodson directing the iso Joes, and if Joe made 6-9 in the fourth quarter last night, that too is an example of excellent coaching. This is encouraging…If Woodson is performing at a high level and actually making adjustments and split second “psychic” decisions, I’d like to know, because I’ve never seen it before.
Personally on the last play, I would have pulled Josh out of the game because he’s the obvious person to leave free on a long jump shot….heck, have him holding his left or something just to confuse the other team, like he couldn’t have come out….Then I would have done everything possible to get a double team on Joe decoy,, while screening to clear out a player who should already be free and make sure there is a cleverly designed play to get an uncontested layup. Maybe leave Josh because when his brain kicks in, he plays like he really wants to win…..
Other teams do this…They are able to design plays for baskets when they need them.
As far as defense, it seems to me that the Hawks have a hard time stopping teams when they really need to….and I haven’t figured that out yet. Is Horford really a liability as some fans say (most notably the guy who calls himself “Fire Horford!”)? Bibby unfortunately seems slow. I would say give Mario a chance to pester anyone who shows signs of getting hot, just to make a point, the Hawks ain’t gonna let this happen, and see who else steps up.
All the Hawks needed last night was a critical rebound (just before the winning shot) or overtime with a clevely designed play or some stamina and recognition when their lead started slipping.
Don’t see DrMaryB who introduced her political crap into this blog….Doctor if you know so much, why didn’t you tell us the mandatory health insurance is being treated like a change in the Tax Code and the agency in this country who is most like the Soviet KGB (the IRS) will be at everybody’s throats to collect? I know the answer. Because this is nothing more than an illegal TAX!
GeeMack
March 23rd, 2010
12:02 pm
CoreyWilson
Why would Woodson make those changes, when what he’s doing is working. If the Hawks go 7-5 over the next 12 games they will be 5 games better than last year, and in a tougher conference.
You’re trying to fire a coach that’s gotten better. Now that makes a lot of sense. You would get GM of the year for that move
rusty
March 23rd, 2010
12:14 pm
we will continue to lose these type of games because this team esp jj insists on playing iso. most of the games we lost when we should have won has been on jj ball hogging . this team will play better without jj.
he is not a good clutch player. he is a streak shooter & is always worried about his points. when he doesnt iso he is a much better player. he is not good enough to ball hog. he always takes the team out of our offensive rhythm. this team will never be real good untill we learn how to pass for better shots. woody is just helpless on eveything.
Nacho
March 23rd, 2010
12:26 pm
When you ISO, you do not use decoys, you have no motion, you help the opposition.
We do not even use a clever iso, we only hand off and stand still. We are not utilizing anyone else.
Simply not good.
JohnDrew
March 23rd, 2010
12:26 pm
The Hawks have shown to be an up and down team like a rollercoaster. Trust me, when the Hawks are on they are good. They may not beat Cleveland or Orlando, but when they are on they can beat just about everybody else. It might be a situation where the hawks simply dont match up against the cavs or the magic. They play everybody else tough. If the Hawks beat the Magic on Wednesday, it will give them a confidence booster and energize them for the rest of the year and into the playoffs. If the Hawks lose to the magic, hawks may lose their opening round series. Its just my opinion based on how ive watch the hawks play this year. You really dont know which Hawks team is going to show up (the good one or the bad one). Mike Woodsen needs to be replaced as soon as humanly possible.
ChippersLoveChild
March 23rd, 2010
12:27 pm
“The Hawks might see the Bucks in the playoffs. I used to think it would be a tough series for the Hawks but I’m not so sure now. The Bucks play hard and are a good defensive team but for three quarters you could see how the Hawks boast much more offensive talent than the Bucks. Too much for the the Bucks to handle over a series, I think.”
Right, I can see how a team that has won 14 out of 16, and beaten teams like Cleveland, Boston, Denver, Utah, and the Hawks in that stretch wouldn’t be much of a challenge. Especially when one of those defeats was to the Hawks in OT in a game in which Milwaukee controlled until Joe got hot and took the game over…. I think Atlanta could be in real trouble if they get the Bucks in the first round.
ChippersLoveChild
March 23rd, 2010
12:30 pm
As for them being tired, this same Bucks team went into double OT with the Kings on Friday, then came back to beat Denver at Denver the next night. I’m not trying to toot the Bucks’ horn, I just don’t think you should make excuses for the Hawks… these are games they need to win. They should have sent a message to a Bucks team they more than likely will face in the first round. Instead, they gave them even more confidence and hope that they can hang with them.
LucilleFrancis
March 23rd, 2010
12:41 pm
The Hawks will do fine if they are playing well, together as a team, AND they are sharing the basketball, playing unselfishly and looking for each other, playing team basketball, THE HAWKS THIS YEAR CAN WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP IF THEY PLAY LIKE THAT. If the Hawks do that they will be fine. If the Hawks look to play iso, 1-on-1 basketball, or hoisting up a ton of 3s, getting outrebounded and playing poor defense, they will lose to whomever they face in the playoffs. If the Hawks continue to play as they have been playing they are going to lose their opening round series. You shouldnt be worried about the Hawks because what I see in the Hawks as of today is a FEAST or FAMINE team. This is a team that as i said earlier can win a world title or they could lose an opening round playoff series. The pendulum can swing to both extremes withi the Hawks depending on how focused they are and how well they are playing.
Mike is Back
March 23rd, 2010
12:42 pm
It is hard to criticize the effort by the Hawks last night…they are playing with passion. JJ was tremendous going down the stretch…my only thing remains the same in those situation…JJ has to make sure to create enough contact to force the Ref to blow the whistle one way or the other… much like Salmons did to Josh…he gave Josh a shove with the off hand to create some contact, and he got the call.
Not sure what JJ was thinking when he fouled Salmons with the game tied…they had already gave him break…the last thing you want to do is put Salmons on the line…but when you are standing right by the Ref making contact…its kind of hard to overlook. lol
I think Al is proving he is a worthy option for Woody to consider in those circumstances. I can’t say enough about the emergence of Al offensive game. He is a BIG GAME PLAYER…that strives under pressure.
I hope Woody starts to call Al’s number in some of those situations.
KEEP IT GOING HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dawgrific
March 23rd, 2010
12:48 pm
I just don’t get how/why the Hawks blow SO MANY fourth quarter leads, and so many of those have been double-digit ones. WHY!!!???
Hawk n the Ham
March 23rd, 2010
12:59 pm
JJ pounded the ball into the basket the whole 4th quarter. Now if that last shot would have went in, everyone on here would be yelling MVP!
O'Brien
March 23rd, 2010
1:01 pm
I read this on nba.com talking about MJ and the Bobcats. I remember northcyde made similiar comments when talking about the ASG.
Jordan said “I don’t see a need to go over the luxury tax unless we go deep [in the playoffs] and we’re a player away or we’re close. I would [then] entertain that idea.”
Hopefully, the Hawks will make a deep playoff run this year. That will increase our likelihood of keeping JJ, and it will increase the possibility of the owners going over the tax.
As far as clutch, check out 82games.com where they have clutch stats. On their website, Clutch is defined as “4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left, neither team ahead by more than 5 points”.
Check out these clutch stats (FG%).
Kobe – .43%
Lebron – .49%
Billups – .46%
JJ – .46%
Crawford – .29%
Roy – .46%
Wade – .32%
The numbers say JJ is clutch. And watching the games, my eyes say JJ is clutch. Hawks need to resign JJ.
GeeMack
March 23rd, 2010
1:05 pm
Nacho,
Even on ISO plays there is still movement & cuts to the basket, or find the open spot for a high percentage shot. Woody’s been playing ball all his life and has played and coached with some of the greatest basketball minds that ever lived. You know he gives those guys other options in the Iso sets. Now them taking advantage of those options are on the players.
Wink
March 23rd, 2010
1:13 pm
Hawks gave a good effort, but as usual they wasted if by going completely to ISO Joe. During that forth quarter duel between Joe & Salmons, Salmons had other teammates step up and make shots. They must have scored on 8 or 9 straight possessions. The ball should have ended up with Jamal on occassion to give the defense something else to think about. Marvin disappeared again after playing light out in the previous game, but we still should have used Horford as facilitor on a couple of trips down the floor, his game was strong last night.
We can give them credit for winning 4 of last 6 games, but the two losses came after we blew big leads; same with a couple of the wins where we applaused them for being “tough”.
My wish is that we finish 5th, which would not improve our record or playoff position from last year. Using pure numbers Woody should be shown the door at year’s end. Too much talent to keep losing the same way with a team that is so much better than last year, but not a significant upgrade in team maturity & record to this point. Marvin should be running with the second unit where this type of inconsistency could be tolerated; it’s the role he played at North Carolina and he became a lottery pick.
Yes, finish 5th, get us a new coach (Fire Woody), and we still will get the same matchup with the Bucks. Steal home court by winning 1st game and presto its the same as finishing 4th…benefit Woody goes and we lose in second round to Boston, Orlando or the King James Gang (Cavs).
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
1:48 pm
O’Brien,
I agree that JJ passes the eye test as a clutch player. And it’s true that IF he makes the last shot, and we go on to win in OT, that folks would be ooohing and aaahing about his greatness.
But I would rather lose a game sharing the ball, than lose it with ISO’s.
The worst things about ISO-Joe (or ISO-any Hawk) are:
1) Joe doesn’t know exactly where he’s going so he needs LOTS of space.
2) His teammates have no idea if he’ll shoot it or throw it to them with a few seconds left.
3) It allows the defense to rest 3 or 4 players for an entire possession.
4) We don’t send cutters through to make the defense react. So, all too often it results in a double-team and a highly contested shot.
5) Because of the space requirements (see #1) and the uncertainty about WHEN a shot goes up, rebounders are way out of position, making it, in essence, an all-or-nothing play.
Good when it works, bad when it doesn’t. And it works more often than not, BUT……..
In principle, I’m against something that takes away from TEAM PLAY.
JeJe
March 23rd, 2010
1:50 pm
WE MUST RESIGN JOE. WE CANNOT GO OVER THE CAP IF WE DO NOT RESIGN A CURRENT PLAYER
sam'l
March 23rd, 2010
1:55 pm
Someone named Corey made good sense. Bibby and Williams (but not Pachulia unfortunately at least recently) should save up their energy on the bench and be determined that when they come out, they’re gonna be just like Crawford, ready to seize the initiative and make their mark on the game….and be prepared to play defense as if their life depended on it.
I made the iso joe point because some blogger suggested Joe isod on his own without Woody’s approval and for some reason that threw me a little bit. There is a natural progression in a game…perhaps the first few minutes are VERY important because they set a tone…..then the progression of importance increases up to the last play of the game where you really should have something different prepared. If Joe isoed 9 times in a quarter, have something ready and have shooters prepared to be in certain spots…look at films at what Boston does, San Antonio, perhaps the Lakers, Orlando! they have 3 point shooters who know they can knock it down coming out from down low…..I don’t know how smart Bibby is, but he might want to consider doing this and becoming sort of an assistant coach….
There is someone on this blog who thinks Woody is a great coach because he improves the team every year…..Well, okay, but my opinion is that this team should already have won 50 games this year except for the coaching and another 2 for weird refing….Cleveland time clock game and Dallas Kidd bumping and maybe another 1 for bad scheduling.(2 back to back Boston and Orland in 1 week)…
In other words, the Hawks may already have the talent to be at the top of the league, so Woody’s job is not to improve the club slowly agonizingly, but to put the whole thing together NOW as a great coach with great players will do. So I think the people who criticize Woody don’t hate him as a man but want the best for a team which deserves the best. Anyway, that’s my rebuttal without any rancor whatsoever, Gee Mack. One thing I don’t get is with all the cuts on the iso, why would he take 9 shots in one quarter? I don’t think all that planned cutting and screening is that effective, and the coach is responsible for that too. That sounded snarky. After 50 years of being a Hawks fan, I really want them to win the whole thing or give it their best effort….unfortunately, these guys are headed for a huge pay cut in the upcoming years because you can’t lose millions of dollars every year anymore because the overall value of the team isn’t going up for resale. The Yes Party and the No party both have and will see to that..
sam'l
March 23rd, 2010
2:02 pm
That said, my final thought is I really hope the Hawks beat Orlando, and I know everybody here feels the same way (except maybe that Milwaukee blogger who even gave the Hawks props for being an interesting team). If anybody asked which way I went, tell them “thataway.”
O'Brien
March 23rd, 2010
2:20 pm
Sautee,
I agree about the potential issues with the ISOs. Everybody knows its coming, so they all stand around and watch JJ and his defenders.
But most teams (with a legit All-Star) will run ISOs at the end of the game and depend on them to make something happen. JJ wasn’t able to get to a good spot last night, and he missed, but we’ve seen him (and Crawford) win games off ISOs.
One exception is King James. If LeBron does not take the final shot, he gets criticized. But I like the fact that he will pass to a teamate if he is open (even if there is a lot of ISO LeBron during the game). Just be ready to share the blame if you pass the ball and that player misses.
The one thing I would like to see, is the Hawks play inside out through Horford more down the stretch. He was 5-5 in the fourth against Bucks, he played well in 4th quarter against Toronto and Spurs. Give him the ball more, and let him pass it back out if nothing is there.
But once the initial entry pass is not there, Hawks go away from him too quickly. We are too quick to settle for jump shots.
BarryWhistler
March 23rd, 2010
2:33 pm
Bibby is fantastic at running a fast break. For a half-court, slow down offense or a more methodical time released offense, Joe Johnson or Jamal Crawford can orchestrate or run those probably more effective than Bibby because Bibby has the tendency to hoist up 3s and he doesnt see the offense as well as he used to. The Hawks need a floor general, someone tall enough to see the court (like a Magic Johnson) who can see the plays develop early enough to make something happen. Chris Paul would have been good had we draft him instead of Marvin, but weve got to get someone in here who can run the offense. I say give MO EVANS the opportunity to learn how to do it. Maybe bring in MAGIC JOHNSON to teach Evans how to run the point. Dont let Bibby continue to do it because Bibby doesnt make the lightning quick, razer sharp passes he used to make and a lot of his passes get picked off and are thrown out-of-bounse as turnovers. You need a good floor general to get the ball and whip it around to the appropriate personal. Employee #24 (Marvin) cant do it because he hardly can get himself into the flow of the games. Just get somebody with experience at running the point. Then you will see the Hawks flourish and their talents will start to come alive.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
2:40 pm
O’Brien,
Agreed.
It’s really not THAT hard to get a decent entry pass. Horford is PLENTY athletic enough to lob over the top if he’s being fronted. A couple of back doors like Bibby does to Josh would quickly change the tactic of fronting Al. Or simply change the angle of the entry pass. I really HATE hearing the excuse of “well, he was being denied so we went away from him”. What that really tells me is that the WILL to get the ball inside is all too quickly dropped with the least bit of resistance.
We need more WILL from our guards to play inside out. Woody can tell them, but they have to execute.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
2:46 pm
BarryWhistler
about this:
“The Hawks need a floor general, someone tall enough to see the court (like a Magic Johnson) who can see the plays develop early enough to make something happen. Chris Paul would have been good had we draft him instead of Marvin, but weve got to get someone in here who can run the offense.”
Barry this doesn’t make sense. Magic was 6′ 9″. CP3 is 6′ 0″.
But, hey, CP3 sees the court pretty well for a runt.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
3:02 pm
Barry,
I’m not trying to pick on you but you also said this:
“Dont let Bibby continue to do it because Bibby doesnt make the lightning quick, razer sharp passes he used to make and a lot of his passes get picked off and are thrown out-of-bounse (sic) as turnovers.”
Are you aware that this season is Bibby’s lowest in his career for turnovers?
1.16 / game whereas his career average is 2.3 / game.
His second lowest season was last year (1.62 / gm). If anything, he’s getting BETTER at not turning it over. And yes, as Ken Strickland argues, he’s not penetrating as much, so that has the effect of lowering that stat, but overall, I think it’s a stretch to argue that he’s being somehow more careless with the ball than earlier in his career when the exact opposite is shown by the stats.
And yes, he’s down in assists from last year (one fewer / gm) but he’s also playing 7+ minutes fewer per game than last year.
Barry
March 23rd, 2010
3:11 pm
Hey Y’all:
I love Joe Johnson to death, but we need to stop the “ISO JOE” stuff in critical moments of the game. With 5 minutes to go in the game, the Hawks stopped passing the ball around and instead let Joe do his “ISO JOE” routine. He did it a number of times and scored. He kept doing it all the way to the end of the game where he eventually missed the winning shot. The other players on the Hawks got cold standing around watching Joe do his ‘ISO” thing. They started missing shoots and movement at the critical points of the gam. The other team was pounding in 3’s while Joe was getting his ISO “2’s”. The Bucks eventually caught up and passed the Hawks due to the Hawks settled for Joe’s ‘ISO” 2’s. The entire team should have been in the attack during the final minutes. Points should have come from other players cutting, slashing, and shooting the ball. Not one players stopping and slowly backing into the rim while his team mates watch. Joe is great!! But too much “ISO JOE” during critical parts of the game can throw the whole team of. Especially when he miss with the team out of position to rebound.
Clyde
March 23rd, 2010
3:36 pm
FIRE WOODY
“Joe is great!! But too much “ISO JOE” during critical parts of the game can throw the whole team of.” -Barry
Years have gone by and Woody hasn’t gotten this through his head. This cat will call a timeout and instead of drawing up a play he will say just give it to Joe. WTF
FIRE WOODY
cp
March 23rd, 2010
4:46 pm
The Truth that was a great post. Its baffling that Woodrow says he needs to watch the tape to see what happens. If the team keeps doing the same thing over and over and over there should not be a need to watch tape. As a coach you should know whats going on seeing how your team keeps making the same mistakes. The problem is we have a coach who cant seem to make adjustments therefore the team keeps making the same mistakes in crucial situations. And whats everybody hung up on 50 wins for? If the Hawks don’t perform well in the playoffs those 50 wins wont matter. I’m not worried about how many games we win. I’m more concerned about how we are playing in these games.
The Truth
March 23rd, 2010
4:47 pm
This articlemakes sense. If we lose JJ, Manu Ginobili could be a short term and much cheaper alternative until we acquire some young legs elsewhere. Even better, if we sign and trade JJ plus add Manu, we could dominate depending on who is targeted.
Moe luv
March 23rd, 2010
5:12 pm
I heard on tv that if we get a center, AL would move to the 4 and Josh to the 3. WTF…Josh to the 3 spot? He can’t dribble..he can’t shoot…he can’t play one on one defense. Granted, he is good and getting his teammates the ball to score but I dont think him at the three is the answer.
1) Josh Smith should never be allowed to take a jumpshot in the 4th quarter under 6 minutes (especially if the game is close.
2) Who is our starting Power Forward?? Why is josh always at the three point line in our offensive sets??
LUV JOSH SMITH!!!! HATE MIKE WOODSON AND THIS OFFENSE!
HawksFan11
March 23rd, 2010
5:13 pm
It’s not hard for me to criticize the effort by the Hawks last night. No more “it’s just one game” excuses, or last shot heroics will do.
Ego, and nothing more, cost the Hawks this game. Joe Johnson was simply going to be the Hawks leading scorer and that’s that.
For 3 solid quarters, the team shared the ball, played unselfishly, worked inside-out, played stifling defense, and dominated the game.
Then, in the 4th quarter, with the Hawks still with a sizable lead, all of that came to a grinding halt when Joe & Woody decided that it’s time for him to “take over and make plays”. (I guess you could call that the in-game adjustment we’ve been asking for from the coach) The result? Just like earlier this year in Chicago, the rest of the team stops working and is forced to watch Joe work, disrupting the flow completely.
Not counting the final prayer shot by Crawford, the shot count in the 4th quarter, after JJ came back in replacing Mo Evans is as follows:
Johnson – 11
Smith – 3
Crawford – 1
Bibby – 1
Horford – 0
Horford dominates the paint for six quarter straight, and that’s why we should stop going there and have Joe Johnson take over. ZERO SHOT ATTEMPTS FOR AL HORFORD!
Here’s an adjustment that the Hawks should consider. Gone are the days when Joe had to be, and was “The Man”. Throughout the year, even us lowly bloggers have recounted how this guy stepped up tonight and that guy the next. The Hawks are a different team from that which Joe joined and everyone contributes now.
I’m afraid we’re in for a short 09-10 post season and a long 10-11 season if the current mindset persists.
ToothFairy
March 23rd, 2010
5:27 pm
During this offseason, the Hawks had a wonderful chance to dramatically improve their ball club. They did so by bringing in Jamal Crawford, which was good, but the Hawks could have done even better by getting two more players that were let go by the Orlando Magic: Heido Turkelu AND Rafer Alsten. Had the Hawks signed those two guys, the Hawks would have been in a position to win the title. The Hawks problems so far has been a stagnant offense along with an offense that is predictable (isos for jj, which has become boring). Had the Hawks acquired those two guys-you could have made Rafer Alsten your point guard, and you literally had two guys through which you could run your offense through, either Alsten or Turkelu, either one. That would have been fabulous because both of those guys are great 3pt shooters. Of course, those two guys signed with two other teams: Alsten with Miami and Turkelu with Toronto. Its unfortunate because those are the two guys who could have solved ALL of the Hawks problems. They both have incredible scoring punch making 3s and jumpshots in general and they both have dynamic diversified games whereby either guy can score inside or out. Had the Hawks acquired those two guys their offense would never get stale and the Hawks probably would have had at least 60 wins by now. Who is our general manager anyway.
BIGWORM
March 23rd, 2010
5:31 pm
not talking about marvin this time he only had two shots but woodson i know players play but GOOD coaching can get wins like last night but we don’t have that he don’t have no offensive game plan at all i wonder what do he be drawing on board during timeouts its always iso joe .BULLSH—t
Ken Strickland
March 23rd, 2010
5:41 pm
How many more times does Woodson have to see teams taking advantage of us switching everything before getting it through his thick, stubborn head that some changes have to be made? Once again we saw Horford and Smoove switching off their assignment and getting isolated, backed out and taken off the dribble. HOW IN THE HELL CAN OUR 2 BIGGEST STARTERS AND BEST SHOTBLOCKERS PROTECT THE BASKET WHEN THEY’RE AT THE KEY TRYING TO DEFEND AGAINST QUICKER, FASTER PG’S, SG’S OR SF’S CONSISTENTLY ISOLATING THEM AND TAKING THEM TO THE BASKET?
WE’RE NOW GETTING A STEADY DIET OF THE SAME DAMNED THING, ESPECIALLY DURING CRUNCH TIME, AND WOODSON HASN’T MADE A SINGLE DOGGONE ADJUSTMENT TO STOP IT. WHY can’t we do what teams do to us, and that’s fight over picks? We should at least try it and see what happens, since we’ve seen how what we’re doing is hurting us.
In every post gm interview, we hear Woodson regurgitate the same BS about the team not playing good DEF, but he never knows why. Hell, what else can he expect if he continues to insist on playing his beloved swithching DEF, which constantly puts our players in disadvantageous matchups that teams successfully exploit.
Can anyone explain why we can get a sizable lead by running the OFF and moving the ball, but completely abandon the concept when it comes to protecting that lead in the 4th qtr? Own our last 2 OFF possessions they double teamed JJ, who forced 2 very difficult shots when he could have passed the ball to JCrawford, who was wide open both times.
I guess that’s what happens when a HC insists on closing out gms using SG’s, who are our primary one on one scorers, to run the OFF instead of installing or developing a PG to direct the OFF. It’s very easy for a DEF to double team the player with the ball, but the rules won’t permit double teaming a player without the ball. Why not let JJ or Crawford position themselves without the ball and force the DEF to prevent either from getting the ball with single coverage. That’s exactly what the Bucks did when JJ fouled Salmons, when he tryed to prevent him from getting the ball. That foul basically ended any chance we had of winning that gm.
cp
March 23rd, 2010
6:03 pm
I don’t think we had an assist in the 4th quarter. How Woodrow has not realized by now we are a good team when we share the ball is beyond me. Too many times we get the lead by sharing the ball and everyone being involved only to abandon that plan in the 4th quarter and go iso mode. I don’t mind having iso plays but why do we continue to go away with whats working. We always seem to get a lead by playing one way then throw that concept away and lose the lead.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
6:17 pm
cp,
Co-sign
WolfmanJack
March 23rd, 2010
6:24 pm
The Hawks season will be wasted, in my opinion, if they don’t bring home the Larry O’Brien trophy. GO HAWKS! Let’s win the title and gain some respect!
JeJe
March 23rd, 2010
6:26 pm
WE MUST RESIGN JOE. WE CANNOT GO OVER THE CAP IF WE DO NOT RESIGN A CURRENT PLAYER..
JeJe
March 23rd, 2010
6:34 pm
TO BE A TRUE HAWKS FAN, U MUST BE SATISFIED WITH LOSING CLOSE GAMES AND MEDIOCRITY!
IF JOE LEAVES, WE WILL HAVE NO MONEY TO SPEND ON INCOMING FREE AGENTS. CANNOT GO OVER SALARY CAP IF IT’S NOT A CURRENT PLAYER
Clyde
March 23rd, 2010
6:51 pm
FIRE WOODY
Sam'l
March 23rd, 2010
7:29 pm
It now seems Hawks may finish fourth…due to the number of away games, 2 games against Cleveland, the big one against Orlando (go Hawks!), 3 back to backs, and all the various problems mentioned previously.
I have been on the fire woody bandwagon for a few years, and I think the Hawks should have won 50 now, not by the end of the season (not because 50 is such a great number, I just counted up the number of game they blew and added that to the current win total). But what I would like to hear now is a tape of all of Woody’s huddles superimposed on the game itself just to see what he is really saying.
Jeje makes sense. Joe may go…..don’t go Joe. Personally, I think he will go. He can’t stand losing some of these games anymore than we can….I don’t necessarily mean last night….I mean the embarrassing stuff. We competed last night, still shouldn’t have lost, based on our potential talent. I think Joe feels he has given his best night in and night out, and he will want to make sure his franchise won’t go bankrupt before his career is over. Joe is pretty doggone smart, and he thinks for himself. When Joe and Jamal are sharing the ball as in San Antonio, it was really fun to watch what they both do with the ball…..they are both very, very good.
I think this team really could win it all…… I really do……..we’ll see when they play Orlando whether this is just another fantasy….I predict a win…primarily because we lost to the Bucks, and the Hawks are scared to lose too many games……bad motivation, I know……….
rusty
March 23rd, 2010
7:42 pm
hawks fan # 11 i agree with you 100%. this type of play has caused a collaspe of our offense & a lot of losses
Blast
March 23rd, 2010
7:44 pm
I have no confidence that Hawks will beat Orlando tomorrow, sad to say.
o.O-Mac-Town -Macon, Georgia- Westsider-O.o
March 23rd, 2010
7:52 pm
Sam’l
March 23rd, 2010
7:29 pm
It now seems Hawks may finish fourth…due to the number of away games, 2 games against Cleveland, the big one against Orlando (go Hawks!), 3 back to backs, and all the various problems mentioned previously.
………………………………………………………..
from reading that and considering the way the Bucks are playing…..I wouldn’t be totally shocked if the Hawks finished in a HORSE RACE with MIL for 4th
o.O-Mac-Town -Macon, Georgia- Westsider-O.o
March 23rd, 2010
7:54 pm
but also….with those games remaining..it also gives the Hawks a chance to prove to themselves, the league, and CLE/ORL that they are gonna seriously challenge them in the playoffs.
O'Brien
March 23rd, 2010
8:18 pm
Ken S,
Woody is blind when it comes to the switching. The Bobcats abused the Hawks down the stretch by getting the matchup they want. Felton made a shot over Josh that would have been the game winner.
The Spurs abused the switching. We saw Manu and RJ drive by Smoove and get to the rim. The Bucks abused the switching. Even Ridnour was making shots over Horford.
MC,
Could you ask Woody about the switching defense? Ask him if when he watches film, does it look like teams are running the pick and roll until they get the matchups they want?
He implied we use the switching defense to hide guys on defense (which I assume is Bibby and Crawford). But yet, even when Bibby and Crawford are not in the game, we still switch. Why?
Or maybe you can share some of your comments (if possible) on the effectiveness of the switching.
As for the Magic, Hawks dont have a plan B, because Woody does not have a plan B. Woody’s plan B is to try harder at plan A, because the S#*t works.
I say play Howard straight up, but foul him and send him to the line often. We have Horford, ZaZa, Collins, and RandMo. Even Joe Smith. That’s a lot of fouls. I am okay with sending Howard to the line 20 times (based on his average, he will make 12). But stay on the shooters.
And then hopefully JJ and Crawford will have what it takes to lead us to victory. And we need the Marvin from the Spurs game.
northcyde
March 23rd, 2010
8:23 pm
Still talking about JJs ISOS, when it was the defense that lost the game for us.
HawksFan11 is still talking about the number of shots JJ took, compared to others. Here’s what he doesn’t tell you though.
* The Bucks went on a 24 – 10 run after Evans made that basket, in about a 6 minute span.
* During that sequence, JJ went 5 – 5 FG, to prevent the Bucks from completely blowing the game wide open. He was 7 – 11 FG for the quarter ( 14 pts )
* Also during that sequence, the Bucks missed only one or two shots
* In the 4th, Smoove took 3 shots ( went 2 – 3 ) and Bibby took 2 shots ( 0 – 2 . . . . he had a lay-up blocked and a missed jumper )
* Horford didn’t dominate offensively. He was 5 – 5 FG, but I believe 1 or 2 of those FGs were from offensive rebounds put back into the basket.
* Hawks shot 50% FG, scored 21 pts, and committed 1 turnover in the quarter. Bucks shot 58% FG and scored 31 points.
* Hawks missed 3 out of 4 FTs in the quarter
* Hawks were outrebounded 11 – 6 in the quarter ( including a critical offensive rebound late in that game )
********
Can’t blame this game on the offense. This is all about defense. After pretty much holding the Bucks to 3 consecutive 20 point quarters, we let them hang 31 on us. That can’t happen. The 21 points, with good defense and defensive rebounding, probably turns into a 27 point quarter, and we win that game comfortably.
But it’s the defense that let us down again last night, not the offense.
It’s funny though. People criticized Woody for not riding the hot hand in the Toronto game in the 4th ( Horford ), but have a problem with Woody riding the hot hand ( JJ ) in Milwaukee.
So I as again. What’s the REAL REASON behind this?
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
8:48 pm
Truth-serum said this:
“Play some freaking defense in the middle and the hawks win. Just that simple. When ever the hawks lose check and see, you will find we were outscored in the paint 99% of the time.”
OK, I checked all of our losses this year. 99%, eh?
In EIGHT of our 25 losses we OUTSCORED our opponent in the paint.
99%? Try 68%
But it’s “just that simple”.
LOL in the game here against OKC we scored almost TWICE what they did in the paint (46-24) and STILL lost.
But we who talk about defense starting on the perimeter are all wrong.
Obviously.
BTW, we outscored MIL in the paint last night.
Hey, maybe it’s NOT “just that simple”.
Truth-Serum
March 23rd, 2010
8:52 pm
“Truth-serum said this:
“When the Horford nutt huggers are planting wet kisses they never mention his defense, because they cant.”
I guess he’s forgotten this lie:
northcyde posted stats a couple of weeks ago that showed (at that time) that Horford gave the fewest points to the opposing center per 48 minutes of ANY center in the league.”
The truth is northcyde posted a analysis that showed more than 50 percent of the time when the opposing center decides to shot over horford he scores.
Not only the opposing center but forwards and guards also show case their dunk over horford.
The breakdown also showed that the elite defensive centers kept the opposing center under 50% scoring against them.
No matter how much germs of misinformation you, bubba’s nutthugging jerks publish, at the end of the day horford is still a power forward play center who averages 14 points a game and plays very little defense, preferring rather to pick up garbage rebound while ranking near the bottom of all center in blocking shots and protecting the rim. At last check he was 26th or 27th for centers in the block shots category.
You are entitled to your own opinion saltee, but not your own facts. No matter how you try to glorify 14 points the man play no defense and thats why we keep losing games in the paint.
Finally, the man cant create his own shot and must be lead or set up and thats why he goes cold in the forth quarter.
You and the idiots who think Horford doesnt need to block shots and protect the middle, just score his weak azz 14 points a game and the hawks win are sadly, very sadly mistaken!
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
8:55 pm
northcyde,
Do you think Horford should get more than 5 shots per game?
Truth-Serum
March 23rd, 2010
9:00 pm
In EIGHT of our 25 losses we OUTSCORED our opponent in the paint.
99%? Try 68%
IDIOT ON THE LOOSE!
Try 68%
HAWKS CURRENT WINNING PERCENTAGE.
45 25 0.643
OK IDIOT, HAVE IT YOUR WAY,
IN 68 PERCENT OF THE GAME WHERE WE WIN IN THE PAINT WE WIN.
hc2537
March 23rd, 2010
9:01 pm
like i have been saying MARVIN WILLIAMS is garbage He is a starter in the NBA and goes nights with sometime’s 2point’s-5point’s like lastnight he had 2 ponits he looks lost at times like he’s scared are have some wear to go his hands seem’s like they are too small he fumble the ball alot when he’s going to the basket. I hope this ATLANTA nightlife isn’t messing with my man.
CYDENORTH
March 23rd, 2010
9:02 pm
I WOULD LIKE IT IF HE GOT 3 OR 4 BLOCKS A GAME AND 5OR 6 SHOTS ALTERED AND PUT A COUPLE OF GUYS ON THE SEAT OF THEIR PANTS SO THEY WILL QUIT WALTZING IN TO THE RACK ON US.
IN CASE YOU HAVENT NOTICE YOU CANT WIN GAMES WITH OUT DEFENSE.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
9:09 pm
Truth-serum,
Ironic name since you are LYING yet again about Horford.
He is currently 19th in blocked shots among centers, NOT 26th or 27th as you lied just now. Here’s the link:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Blocks.jsp?league=00&season=22009&conf=OVERALL&position=1&splitType=9&splitScope=GAME&qualified=Y&yearsExp=-1&splitDD=
In fact here are the current rankings for other categories. In each case, I’m listing Horford’s ranking among centers:
Points 4th
Rebounds 5th
Assists 4th
Steals 6th
Dbl-dbl tied 4th
FG% 7th
Eff. 6th
FT% 6th
Blocks 19th
Well, it looks like our undersized center is playing larger than most of the centers in the league.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
9:14 pm
Someone’s math skills are questionable.
8 (the number of times we outscored the opponent but lost)
divided by 25 (the TOTAL number of losses) is .32
Now subtract .32…. am I going too fast?
subtract .32 from 1.00 and you get 68% of the LOSSES (25).
Geez. *sigh*
lewis
March 23rd, 2010
9:23 pm
i love al horford’s determination. hawks are holding his potential back big time. looking phenomenal in his 3rd year, he knows how hard u gotta work and how much u gotta want it to win it all. hawks players who are anywhere from 2-8 years older need to learn from him. he’s one of the few guys on the hawks who hits jumps and posts up with a high %. as he gets more post moves and his jumpshot gets even better, he will continue to make the all star team. I didn’t understand w hy he made it at first, but after watching him since the all-star break he reminds me every game. Josh Smith is athletically gifted and can be tough posting up in the paint, but he makes so many mental errors it almost cancels out his good hustle. gahhhhhhh…..i love this team but they drive me crazy
HawksFan11
March 23rd, 2010
9:29 pm
Northclyde
As usual, your stats are above reproach. All true, but t me they don’t tell the whole story. To me, the entire flow changed when the Hawks went from what was working to a new strategy, and it showed on all of the faces and body language.
“HawksFan11 is still talking about the number of shots JJ took, compared to others. Here’s what he doesn’t tell you though.”
* During that sequence, JJ went 5 – 5 FG, to prevent the Bucks from completely blowing the game wide open. He was 7 – 11 FG for the quarter ( 14 pts )
** Joe went 5-5 FG because he was drawn into an unecessary shootout with Salmons. The Hawks still had the lead when he went on the selfish tirade. This froze the rest of the team out and took them out of their rhythm. When JJ ran out of gas, as he always does, there was nowhere elase to go, so he kept chucking.
* Horford didn’t dominate offensively. He was 5 – 5 FG, but I believe 1 or 2 of those FGs were from offensive rebounds put back into the basket.
** This speaks for itsself when he’s playing this well over a 7 footer. And you co-sign to stopping this kind of play when they can’t stop him in the inerest of JJ going 5-5 and then ……?
* Hawks shot 50% FG, scored 21 pts, and committed 1 turnover in the quarter. Bucks shot 58% FG and scored 31 points.
** And what were the assist totals in the 4th? 4-0 Bucks. Team ball? I think not.
northcyde
March 23rd, 2010
9:42 pm
Of course.
The question is, who do you take shots from, to get Horford more shots?
Crawford was red hot in the 1st half. JJ was red hot in the 4th quarter. They both were a combined 22 – 41 FGs last night and scored almost 50 points.
So in a situation in which our 2 star guards have it going, the complimentary scorers may have to find other ways to score, outside of plays being called for them. The offense will almost always defer to JJ and/or Crawford, when they’re on.
The misconception about Horford and Smoove, is that they’re good enough offensively to be counted on a nightly basis. That’s not true, because both of them are merely average scorers, when you talk about them creating their own shot.
Horford did get one look in that 4th quarter, got fouled, but then missed 2 FTs.
But when you look at last night, our offensive scoring mismatches were JJ vs Salmons and Crawford vs Ridnour. We shot 53% FG as a team. But we didn’t defend well at all in the 4th.
Sautee
March 23rd, 2010
9:51 pm
Ok northcyde, one more question:
Which do you prefer to watch………..assuming a win:
a team moving the ball with balanced scoring
or an ISO heavy team with a dominant scorer?
northcyde
March 23rd, 2010
10:20 pm
@ Sautee . . . I prefer the style that gives us the best chance to wn that particular game. If it’s bal movement, great. If it’s someone individually taking over the game in ISO, that’s great too. It’s not about how “pretty” you play. It’s about winning the game, no matter what.
I personally can’t stand those high scoring – no defense games. What Golden St does is NOT CUTE, even if it is “exciting” basketball. They score a lot, but they don’t stop people. That’s why they lose a lot.
rusty
March 23rd, 2010
10:41 pm
northcyde
it seems every time that joe goes iso-joe(ballhog) ourball movement stops & we almost always lose.it seems in some of our games with orlando he did it early & we got blown out. we are not going to win anythink with iso joe. he is too streaky of a shooter & eats up way to much of the cloak which jc does not.jc will hit a man underneath for an easy basket. joes assist come on passes to the outside with time running oiut
nunna yo biznezz
March 23rd, 2010
10:43 pm
great stats everybody,
questions for all of u,answer any or all..
1.Are we playing the kind of ball at this point of the season,that you thought we would be playing?
2.Do you think there is a chance that sund might suprise us all and sign woody before the playoffs or during the playoffs?? if so,would you agree on it or think he should wait till the end of the playoffs??
3.You might not like this one,but if u were advising the hawks playoffs opponents,how would you tell them to beat this team?
4.Having asked that question,what would you do differently with the hawks current roster and scheme to insure that we not only go far into the playoffs(including the finals)? Or,would they play the same scheme on offense and defense?
5.Looking at the current hawks roster we have now,(in any order and with any number of players)who are the locks to be this team next year?(Even if u had to eat contracts by trading or releasing someone)..
6.In now his 2nd year,are you satisfied or disatisfied with the performance,wheeling,and dealing with GM Rick Sund??
7.I know we’re all hawks fans,but,when the hawks are not playing,is there a 2nd team that u try to follow and keep up with? Who and Why?
8.Looking at the hawks coaching staff,is there a coach on this staff that you think other teams are interested in talking to after the season for a possible head coaching job? Whom would u think and why?
9.Are you satisfied with the ASG as owners,or would you prefer a “1 person owner”? And,which one of the ASG would u think would be the better owner of them all?
10.If the hawks should go on a roll,and beat the lakers,magic,and cavs(whom they play twice),would it be fair to cast them the team to take the eastern conference title and possibly the finals as well?? If not,why not?
11.And,If they were to lose all or most of those games,would you be suprised or not?
Lets play a game.
1st you are named the hawks GM for 2010,and the ASG says to you,”we want you to build our team to take us to the finals and win it this year”..
Who’s your coach??
Who’s on your coaching staff (if u had to pick them)?
What do you do with joe johnson?
What are your immediate needs?? and list if u would draft your needs or if they would be brought in thru trades or free agency..
What type of offense and defense would you run??
And if joe is gone,would you move crawford to the starting 5??
———————————————————-
Last game..
You are a current atlanta hawk player or coach,and im interviewing you..
how would you think these players would or should answer these questions:
To Josh Smith:You got a knock on being hard headed,taking dumb shots,your not focused in a lot games as well..do you think they were fair criticisms,or people just hating because they did not know your situation and what the coach asked you to do? also:what motivated you to play like your playing now? coaches?? fans who criticised your game?? someone you know personally?? or you????
To Jeff Teague: What is the deal with you and coach woodson? We see him get on you hard..To correct your play, what does he say to you or try to do with you in practice?? and are you one of those players who learn more from watching or more from playing?? And,if he is the coach of the hawks next year,do you think you will get more playing time next year?? if not,are you willing to sit around and wait another year or 2 before you do??
To Joe Johnson: Iso Joe is the normal talk among the blog talk on the hawks.Speaking to the fans,are the isolated calls for you helpful to the team in your opinion and if so,why?
To Coach Woodson: YOU GOT HATERS!!
WHAT WOULD U LIKE TO SAY TO THE HATERS WHO SAY YOU CAN’T COACH,CAN’T TEACH OR DEVELOPE YOUNG PLAYERS(ESPECIALLY PG’S),YOUR TEAM IS CONSISTENTLY INCONSISTENT,THEY CAN’T PLAY AGAINST A ZONE DEFENSE,AND THAT YOU ARE RUNNING JOE AND OTHERS INTO THE GROUND WITH THE MINUTES HE AND OTHERS HAVE PLAYED THIS YEAR??
THATS ALL…
darrell starks
March 23rd, 2010
11:05 pm
Yes joe doing the same thing over and over is not helping the team at all get the ball and shoot it joe dont dribble 20seconds of the 24second shot clock, joe should no ball move ment make every one better including him.
A lot of this i blame woody for not running more low post plays for joe and let him touch the ball in the paint so he can go straight 4 a shot,
and how in the H do you play good 1 night and the next night shoot 2 times this is crazy and no excuse, again i blame woody for not running more low post plays for marvin and getting him more involve in the paint thats poor recongnition as a coach.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!
Melvin
March 23rd, 2010
11:11 pm
Nice article on Josh.
http://blogs.hoopshype.com/blogs/woelfel/2010/03/23/slight-fuels-smith/
darrell starks
March 23rd, 2010
11:12 pm
Why dont woody play teague last night this that same bull he have been doing as a coach 2 inconsistent as a coach with no rotation pattern at all, not noing what he might do the following night, next thing you no he might for get 2 put jamal out there LOL.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
northcyde
March 23rd, 2010
11:21 pm
Dang . . . now I feel kind of slly going back and forth with HawksFan11. His name is HawksFan11.
11 = Crawford
HawksFan + Crawford
HawksFan11 = Crawford fan
So even though I’ll prove him wrong once again about that 4th quarter, it won’t matter, because as long as JJ is jacking up shots, it prevents Crawford from doing the same thing.
HawksFan11, all you have to do is go back and review that play by play transcript of the game on our ESPN site.
Ridnour ( twice ), Delfino, and Jerry Springer Stackouse all scored when JJ came back into the game. Luckily for us, JJ made 4 shots in a row, to keep us ahead of them.
THEN Salmons hit a shot.
So JJ wasn’t involved with Salmons in some shootout, he was simply keeping us in the lead. And then look what happened on the next 2 possessions.
* Horford draws a foul and goes to the line . . . he misses 2 FTs
* Next possession, a questionable offensive foul is called on Smoove.
Two possessions . . . no shots for JJ . . . but we lose our 2 point lead because Salmons hit two in a row while that was going on.
THEN JJ hits his next shot for 5 in a row for him.
********
The fact is, even before JJ took 4 shots at the end, the other guys DID have offensive chances to contribute
* Your boy Crawford misses a jumper
* Bibby had a 3 blocked
* Smoove scored on 2 close range shots, before missing the long jumper with around 3 min to go.
* Then JJ hits 2 shots in a row to put us up 2
*******
It’s all right there sir. If you didn’t record the game, simply look at the transcript to see what REALLY happened.
I’m sorry your boy Crawford didn’t get a chance to score 35 on Milwaukee. Maybe he’ll get a chance to do that against ORLANDO.
If he’s as hot in the 4th as JJ was last night, I’m not going to complain if Woody decides to go ISO CRAW . . . and it’s working.
HawksFan11
March 23rd, 2010
11:28 pm
northcyde
March 23rd, 2010
10:20 pm
@ Sautee . . . I prefer the style that gives us the best chance to wn that particular game. If it’s bal movement, great. If it’s someone individually taking over the game in ISO, that’s great too. It’s not about how “pretty” you play. It’s about winning the game, no matter what.
Can’t disagree with a single word here. That’s exactly what I want to see out of the entire Hawks team every night.
HawksFan11
March 23rd, 2010
11:34 pm
Northclyde
As far as the 11 is concerned, sorry, wrong guess, I’m not that simple minded. If you must know, I’m a former military pilot and my callsigns always ended in 11.
And just because you offer a difference of opinion doesn’t prove anyone right or wrong, we just see different things and draw different conclusions as to why they happened. Not about to get into a personal fight with you, but I do love a good debate with a worthy advesary.
Keep ‘em coming pal
HawksFan11
March 23rd, 2010
11:35 pm
Oops, and all this time I’ve been calling you Northclyde. Sorry.
HawksFan11
March 24th, 2010
12:08 am
@Nunna
Great questions, let’s see here:
1.Are we playing the kind of ball at this point of the season,that you thought we would be playing?
No, I thought the Hawks would be leading th division based on their preseason and early season play. Midway throught the first half of the season, they began to look like last years team and here we are.
2.Do you think there is a chance that sund might suprise us all and sign woody before the playoffs or during the playoffs?? if so,would you agree on it or think he should wait till the end of the playoffs??
No, no surprises from Sund there. I think he should wait and see what happens in the playoffs. Many have said in the blog, and I agree, that Coach Woodson may have taken this team as far a he is capable. Go prove us all wrong coach.
3.You might not like this one,but if u were advising the hawks playoffs opponents,how would you tell them to beat this team?
This one is simple. Run if you can, the Hawks don’t get back on transition D. Stay close until the 4th qtr, and play zone D. You’re right, I hate it, but there it is.
4.Having asked that question,what would you do differently with the hawks current roster and scheme to insure that we not only go far into the playoffs(including the finals)? Or,would they play the same scheme on offense and defense?
Kill the switching D, they’ve all figured it out and use it against us. Let your bigs work the middle and they will, they’ve more than proven that they can. Make Josh play his position and ONLY his position. It’s a team sport, so play it like one. This team doesn’t have a closer, so stop tryimg to make one.
5.Looking at the current hawks roster we have now,(in any order and with any number of players)who are the locks to be this team next year?(Even if u had to eat contracts by trading or releasing someone)..
If I’m king for a day, Josh Smith, Al Horford, Jamal Crawford, Joe Johnson. Everyone else is on the table.
6.In now his 2nd year,are you satisfied or disatisfied with the performance,wheeling,and dealing with GM Rick Sund??
You’re kidding, right?
7.I know we’re all hawks fans,but,when the hawks are not playing,is there a 2nd team that u try to follow and keep up with? Who and Why?
No other team. I’m loyal, if nothing else.
8.Looking at the hawks coaching staff,is there a coach on this staff that you think other teams are interested in talking to after the season for a possible head coaching job? Whom would u think and why?
Hard to tell, I never see any of them doing any in-game coaching. Hell, the only one I ever see do anything is Wally the trainer; he keeps track of the timeouts and tells Coach Woodson when to take them.
9.Are you satisfied with the ASG as owners,or would you prefer a “1 person owner”? And,which one of the ASG would u think would be the better owner of them all?
Don’t know enough about the business aspect to offer an opinion here. I do wish that they would have given themselves a chance this year with some mid-year deals though.
10.If the hawks should go on a roll,and beat the lakers,magic,and cavs(whom they play twice),would it be fair to cast them the team to take the eastern conference title and possibly the finals as well?? If not,why not?
As nice a thought as that is, it isn’t realistic. First, the guys themselves don’t believe they’re capable of it, and secondly, the league won’t allow it. We’ve all seen how little respect the Hawks get from the officials, even at home. And beating the Cavs is not going to happen this year, the league has too much invested in LeBron James to let that happen and the officials have made it perfectly clear all year long.
11.And,If they were to lose all or most of those games,would you be suprised or not?
Now that would surprise me. This is a good team with some very talented players on it. It’s what’s kept them in the hunt all year, raw talent. With a little leadership and cohesiveness, they could go all the way.
Misery loves....
March 24th, 2010
12:21 am
HawksFan11 is a very lonely man and a hawk/Woodson hater with out any knowledge. Who would spend so much time talking to themselves.
Other than grandad and sautee, there arent many guys as lonely and lost as H-F11 are lonely.
Get a life dude.
Go Hawks. Another good job Woodson!. I hope you get the talent you need to go to the next level. Great job the what you do have.
JeJe
March 24th, 2010
12:32 am
LOL @ Woody calling timeout to set up the Joe Iso so we had no Timeouts left with 5 seconds to go. LOL!!!!!!!
Truth-Serum
March 24th, 2010
12:32 am
“He is currently 19th in blocked shots among centers, NOT 26th or 27th as you lied just now”
The last time I checked he was 26th amongst centers for block shots. that was about 7-9 days ago. Ok If you say he had a good week and is now the 19th best defensive shot blocking center, why am I not impressed?
Would you agree that this is disgusting? Vulgar? How in the HEAVANS can you get out of the second round with that kind of CRAP? Never mind. Go blame it on Bibby!
WTF am I talking to you for any way. NOBODY ON TEAM BUBBA HAS ANY SENSE ANY WAY.
GOOD NIGHT!
Atlanta Fawks
March 24th, 2010
12:33 am
THE HAWKS WILL BE KNOCKED OUT FIRST ROUND OF PLAYOFFS.
REMEMBER THIS POST WHEN IT HAPPENS…….. AND IT WILL.
JeJe
March 24th, 2010
12:34 am
WHY DID WE DOUBLE TEAM G.HILL/MANU SO THAT DUNCAN COULD ROLL ON THE P&R FOR LAYUPS AND NO ONE WOULD SHIFT?
THAT IS A SIGN OF A RETARDED DEFENSIVE SET.
ALSO, WHY DO WE SWITCH ON P&R’S? WHY DO WE WANT AL ON MANU?
FIRE WOODSON ALEADY. JESUS CHRIST. THIS IS SO DAMN RETARDED. PUTTING YOUR “CENTER” WHO DOESN’T EVEN ENJOY PLAYING DEFENSE ON MANU LOLOL
northcyde
March 24th, 2010
12:39 am
I’ll be at the house within te next hour or two. I need to answer those 11 questions before I go to bed.
PAJASO
March 24th, 2010
12:47 am
JeJe MAYBE WE COULD HAVE PUT THAT DEFENSIVE EXPERT HORFORD ON HIM.
northcyde
March 24th, 2010
2:06 am
1.Are we playing the kind of ball at this point of the season,that you thought we would be playing?
Yep. I thought they would be a 52 win team before the season started, and they’ve pretty much played like a 50 – 55 win team all year. I also thought that Boston, Cleveland, Orlando, LA Lakers, San Antonio, and Denver all had a shot to win 60 games, making the league very top heavy. Seeing that those teams aren’t as dominant as I thought they would be, I definitely like where the Hawks are right now, in comparison to everyone except LA and Cleveland.
2.Do you think there is a chance that sund might suprise us all and sign woody before the playoffs or during the playoffs?? if so,would you agree on it or think he should wait till the end of the playoffs??
No chance in Hades. I think he’s already said that he’ll wait until the end of the year to evaluate Woody. Maybe if we won our last 12 games and finished tied for the best record in franchise history . . . maybe.
3.You might not like this one,but if u were advising the hawks playoffs opponents,how would you tell them to beat this team?
Keep them off the offensive glass and prevent transition baskets off of your missed shots. In turn, turn Hawk misses into transition baskets the other way, seeing that we’re a pretty bad transition defense team.
4.Having asked that question,what would you do differently with the hawks current roster and scheme to insure that we not only go far into the playoffs(including the finals)? Or,would they play the same scheme on offense and defense?
I’d reduce the bench to a solid 8 man rotation, and not try to go 10 deep. This would give Evans and Zaza a chance to play a little more and make a solid contribution on a nightly basis. Jeff Teague, Joe Smith, and Mario West would only play if people were in foul trouble or in a blowout.
On offense, I’d encourage Horford to post up less against the big centers, and rely more on the 15 foot jumper. Against guys his size, I’d tell him to attack. Most everyone’s else roles will go unchanged.
On defense, I’d keep challenging Crawford to be a better on the ball defender and fight through screens more. This would give Woody the ability to switch up defenses more frequently. And I’d stop double teaming post players who aren’t a big offensive threat.
5.Looking at the current hawks roster we have now,(in any order and with any number of players)who are the locks to be this team next year?(Even if u had to eat contracts by trading or releasing someone)..
Locks: Smith, Horford, Crawford and JJ if he’s re-signed. Everyone else at this point is expendable, if an upgrade can be found at that position.
northcyde
March 24th, 2010
2:13 am
6.In now his 2nd year,are you satisfied or disatisfied with the performance,wheeling,and dealing with GM Rick Sund??
I initially didn’t like the Crawford deal at first. But Crawford has been great as a Hawk. That deal gives Sund passing marks as GM. The long-term signings of Bibby, Zaza, and Marvin don’t look nearly as good as they did back in the summer though. If those signings prevent the ASG from retaining JJ, then it’s a HORRIBLE move by them.
northcyde
March 24th, 2010
2:14 am
7.I know we’re all hawks fans,but,when the hawks are not playing,is there a 2nd team that u try to follow and keep up with? Who and Why?
Since I’m in Tennessee, and get to see a lot of their games, it’ll have to be the Memphis Grizzlies. If they were in the East, they’d be a playoff squad. Probably the #5 seed. They’re a young team and they play hard on a nightly basis. They’re outmatched on most nights vs the real good teams, but they still play them tough at home. They remind me so much of the 08 – 09 Hawks. A very nice team to watch.
8.Looking at the hawks coaching staff,is there a coach on this staff that you think other teams are interested in talking to after the season for a possible head coaching job? Whom would u think and why?
No.
9.Are you satisfied with the ASG as owners,or would you prefer a “1 person owner”? And,which one of the ASG would u think would be the better owner of them all?
People constantly rip the ASG, but when they brought in Mike Bibby 2 years ago, knowing that they’d be spending right up to the luxury tax for the next 2 years, that at least let me know that they are willing to spend money to put a quality product on the floor. They didn’t have to do that. They could’ve very easily kept Shelden, AJ, and Lue around here . . let their contracts expire . . and saved a lot of money. But they went out and got Bibby for a final playoff push in 08. Without that trade, there’s no telling what this franchise would look like right now. The Crawford trade further showed how committed they are to keep the Hawks at a high level. Now, let’s see if they’ll pass the final test, and re-sign JJ.
10.If the hawks should go on a roll,and beat the lakers,magic,and cavs(whom they play twice),would it be fair to cast them the team to take the eastern conference title and possibly the finals as well?? If not,why not?
Most of our fans will, but it’s like I’ve been saying for a few weeks now. The playoffs are a different animal. Losses to bad or mediocre teams are not an indication of how we’ll play in the playoffs. Conversely, wins vs good to great teams aren’t an indication either.
The Playoffs are all about matchups and adjustments. Denver losing to the Knicks tonight does not mean that Denver will lose in the 1st round of the Western Conference playoffs. In a 7-game series, the team that exploits matchups and plays “their” game, will win the series.
Us beating the Lakers, Cavs, and Magic will look REAL GOOD, but it’s not an indication of how good our chances are in the playoffs. You’re still talking about us having to win a playoff road game, if we faced one of those teams.
11.And,If they were to lose all or most of those games,would you be suprised or not?
The Hawks are mentally tough, and tend to play very well at home. They’ll win one of the home games vs the Magic or the Lakers. We’ve battled Cleveland twice this year. I expect another battle for Round 3 on the road, win or lose.
So yeah, if we lost all 3 games, I’d be surprised.
HawksFan11
March 24th, 2010
2:23 am
I swear, the personal attacks and name calling on this blog is beneath childish. Is this about basketball or what?
northcyde
March 24th, 2010
3:11 am
Lets play a game.
1st you are named the hawks GM for 2010,and the ASG says to you,”we want you to build our team to take us to the finals and win it this year”..
Who’s your coach??
Mike Woodson?
I mean, when you start looking at some of the “hot names” in the coaching ranks, it’s not like there are a lot of guys out there who are available, that will coach us to a title. If Larry Brown still didn’t have a job, then maybe him. People love Hubie Brown’s commentary, but he’s 76 years old. He’s not coaching anybody’s team ever again. Avery Johnson? He lost in the 1st round with arguably the 5th best team in NBA history ( 67 – 15 record ) . . to Golden St.
The key to the Hawks winning a title, isn’t changing coaches, it’s upgrading the personnel, or seeing one or more of these young guys develop into legit All-Stars.
Who’s on your coaching staff (if u had to pick them)?
Wow . . . have no idea. Not that versed in assistant coaches
What do you do with joe johnson?
Re-sign him at all costs
What are your immediate needs?? and list if u would draft your needs or if they would be brought in thru trades or free agency..
Same as last year. A frontcourt defender/rebounder . . and a legit backup PG. With Mike Bibby becoming more of a liability on the court, we may need a PG who can really run the show. The jury is still way out on Teague, so if there is a guy in the draft who is better than him, it wouldn’t hurt to go get him. Maybe a Grevis Vasquez out of Maryland . . a big PG who can create his own shot and shoot the midrange jumper.
But I would prefer the frontcourt defender/rebounder first. I would love to have an active body like Jarvis Varnardo here. He’d have to beef up, but he’d be a great addition to the 2nd unit as a shot blocker and defender.
What type of offense and defense would you run??
High post, pick and pop, and Iso
And if joe is gone,would you move crawford to the starting 5??
Would have no choice but to. He’d be the only legit shot creator on the team, unless we went out and got someone else.
GTFan1
March 24th, 2010
6:25 am
Have you guys been following the situation in Cleveland?
http://thesportsdebates.com/category/tsd/the-resigning-ilgauskus-debate/
Hawk n the Ham
March 24th, 2010
9:33 am
Northcyde – your thoughts on who they acquire for immediate needs. It’s good to get some more big bodies down low, but have to still look for the athletic type of Horford who can run the floor. If we bring in some big slow BigZ style body, it lessens our nimbers on our fast break offense….just a thought.
ToothFairy
March 24th, 2010
9:40 am
The Hawks have 12 games left. Im not trying to be negative but according to my calculations, the best thing that would happen for the franchise is for them to finish 1-11, which means they will finish 46-36, ONE GAME WORSE THAN LAST YEAR with a superior team to last year. This would probably get Woody fired, which would be the best thing that could possibly happen to the franchise at this point. Why? Because Woody is coaching a team that is capable of winning 60 games, but is underachieveing, losing games they should win and blowing big leads to take losses. That will continue to happen at long as Woody is coach of the Hawks. It happened during his 37 win mediocure playoff team and it happend last year and this year because of the coach. So once again, the BEST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN TO THE HAWKS IN THE REMAINDING 12 GAMES IS FOR THEM TO GO 1-11, FINISH 46-36 SO THAT WOODY CAN GET FIRED. I SURE HOPE IT HAPPENS.
terrell
March 24th, 2010
9:45 am
Toothfairy, at least we dont have to worry about a 4th qtr collapse tonight. We”ll probably be trying to make a 4th qtr comeback. But your’re right, this team should easily be 3 or 4 games ahead of Boston for the 3 spot.
terrell
March 24th, 2010
9:49 am
Northcyde, that GS team coulda beat ANYBODY that year. They were a matchup nightmare. BDiddy, Monte, and Captain Jack? Are you kidding me? Cant f
terrell
March 24th, 2010
9:51 am
I meant, Cant fault Avery for that. Btw, didn’t they go to the Finals the following year?
terrell
March 24th, 2010
9:52 am
Guess you gonna blame Avery for Dirk shriveling up like a punk when it counted.
O'Brien
March 24th, 2010
10:03 am
terrell,
I like Avery, but he does have some coaching warts too. I dont blame Avery for the entire meltdown, because as you mentioned, Dirk was MVP that year, and he had a bad playoff series.
However, Avery made one big mistake. He changed his lineup to match GS. When you have the #1 team in the league, you should force others to change their style and their lineups to match you. Instead, he tried to matchup with GS.
Also, his team had a 2-0 lead in the NBA finals, and lost (although Wade got almost every single call that series). And his other team lost in the first round of the playoffs too. So his playoff resume is not that impressive, given the talent he was working with.
Although I have been very critical of Woody, I think the ASG should bring him back (unless the Hawks collapse in the playoffs).
However, I would like him to change up his coaching staff. We need an offensive coordinator (I’d be willing to give Mark Jackson (really good PG and analyst) a try), and I need a defensive coordinator on staff (obviously, Woody would still have final say, but the switching needs to be more flexible).
Now if the Hawks collapse and Woody does not get a new contract, then I would be open to Avery.
Melvin
March 24th, 2010
10:43 am
MC,
I don’t think the Hawks can just file this Bucks lost to tired legs. This was the type of game that elite teams win. So what they were playing a back to back? This was a game that would have secured a playoffs spot, against a possibly playoff opponent and they had a 7 point lead beginning of the 4th. How much motivation do they need in order to win an important game like this? Teams that have championship inspiration willed themselves to a win in these types of games. This lost is inexcusable. I have to question their mental toughness after a loss like this.
Thats some funny shhytee!
March 24th, 2010
10:45 am
“Because Woody is coaching a team that is capable of winning 60 games,”- I see why they call you the ToothFairy .
Most experts picked this team to win 44-47 games and finish 4-8 in the pecking order. I will however agree with you that if you want to get woodson fired(as this site is dedicated to doing), you would have to do worse than what the experts predicted, which aint likely. In fact, if you visit normal blog pages, you will find Woodson is held in high esteem. Further you will find not only is he a coach of the year candidate for exceeding the projections but doing it with out a point guard who cant play defense and a center who doesn’t want to.
They have only 1 legitimate Allstar and a consolation pick.
Ok, heres a quiz; Name me two teams that have won a NBA championship with only 1 All star?
Bonus points; how many on the hawks bench have NBA championship rings?
terrell, absolutely! coaches dont play the game players do. At the end of the day its their job and what happens on the court is their responsibility. Your boss doesnt do your work for you he just tells you what it is. Get it done!
“He is currently 19th in blocked shots among centers, NOT 26th or 27th as you lied just ” I appreciate He is currently 19th in blocked shots among centers, NOT 26th or 27th as you lied just now.- Saltee by the end of each week stats are changing. Lets agree that whether hes 19th this week or 29th this is a horrible fact. He is consistently at the bottom levels in this defensive category.
The offensive numbers you post showed that at best he was in the fourth best center in 2 or 3 area’s but for the most part he is a middle of the pack guy offensively and near the bottom when defending. over 51% percent of the time the opposing center scores on him when there is an attempt, unlike the misinformation you tried to spread. Yes, like the many other powerforwards playing center til management can get a real one Horford is a middle of the pack guy.
As Ive said repeatedly, we wont win a championship with him at center. Bottom line.
NORTHCYDE- im going to CO-SIGN and acknowledge that we may have come to the same conclusion from different paths but the bottom line is we share the following sentiments, almost exactly:
Who’s your coach??
Mike Woodson?
I mean, when you start looking at some of the “hot names” in the coaching ranks, it’s not like there are a lot of guys out there who are available, that will coach us to a title. If Larry Brown still didn’t have a job, then maybe him. People love Hubie Brown’s commentary, but he’s 76 years old. He’s not coaching anybody’s team ever again. Avery Johnson? He lost in the 1st round with arguably the 5th best team in NBA history ( 67 – 15 record ) . . to Golden St.
The key to the Hawks winning a title, isn’t changing coaches, it’s upgrading the personnel, or seeing one or more of these young guys develop into legit All-Stars.
Who’s on your coaching staff (if u had to pick them)?
Wow . . . have no idea. Not that versed in assistant coaches
What do you do with joe johnson?
Re-sign him at all costs
What are your immediate needs?? and list if u would draft your needs or if they would be brought in thru trades or free agency..
Same as last year. A frontcourt defender/rebounder . . and a legit backup PG. With Mike Bibby becoming more of a liability on the court, we may need a PG who can really run the show. The jury is still way out on Teague, so if there is a guy in the draft who is better than him, it wouldn’t hurt to go get him.
And if joe is gone,would you move crawford to the starting 5??
Would have no choice but to. He’d be the only legit shot creator on the team, unless we went out and got someone else.
Now,
Is there any one else on this site with some sense? Hello-o-o-o-abyss….
Thats some funny shhytee!
March 24th, 2010
10:48 am
*we have a point guard, who cant play defense and a center who doesn’t want to.
rusty
March 24th, 2010
10:50 am
let woodson walk,sihn avery
Grandad
March 24th, 2010
10:53 am
northcyde: (when you said…lets play a game…can anyone play?)
I hope that was not just for ‘HawksFan11′ [I love this stuff]
*I would NOT re-sign Wdsn. [surprise]*answer – Tom Thibodeau(short list)
*asst.coaches:
*perhaps: Jeff Bzdelik [off.coordinator] Thibodeau’s a def. guy.
Jeff has coached in the league[Denver]asst/& HC, versed in princeton off., not known if he would leave Colorado. Give him a call.
*Rick Mahorn: ‘Bigs’ coach. *keep Mark Price on staff.
*Add Paul Silas to staff as an older vet coach, add respect factor.
*would consider Larry Drew.
*Joe Johnson:
Re-sign Joe @ all costs! Cannot be adequately replaced.*[CBA]
*immediate needs:
*The jury may be out on Teague but not in my book.
*Astro Joe made a good point on another blog:
Draft for a specific criteria. He mentioned Jarvis Vanardo as well.
However, if we stay put in the 20’s, I would go for ‘Ekpe Udoh’,[Baylor]
it’s interesting that one mock draft has him currently going to us.
Some have him going much higher. I like Vasquez also, and if
Keith Benson [Oakland] comes out, he’s another possibility.
*Relly though if we could trade up high enough, Xavier Henry,
would be my 1st choice.
*Last – I would seek a [5].
look @ what it would take to sign Haywood.[doubtful]
Use Marv & Childress + maybe Zaza as trade bait:
Bargnani as a stretch [5].
He fits our personel. Al & Josh are inside oriented, so we need an
outside threat; ‘Big’. Would give us a very versatle front ct.
Oh yeah – What offense to run? :
*our personel seems to be a perfect fit for the triangle.
However, whomever the coach is or would be, makes that call!
Anything with player movement, and ball reversal making the defense
guard both sides of the floor. Not to mention one that take advantage
of all our assets.
That’s enough for now…What if Joe leaves…ask me later?
I’ll be happy to opine.
Kelvin
March 24th, 2010
10:54 am
I wouldn’t be shocked if this team didn’t make it out of the first round.
Hawk n the Ham
March 24th, 2010
11:01 am
Fire Woody. Hire Happy Gilmore……
“Just tap it in, just tap it in…..give it the ole tap,tap,tapa-roo!”
Grandad
March 24th, 2010
11:04 am
Addendum to previous post:
I can’t believe I left a name off my short list:
I would make a call to ‘Steve Smith’ & gauge his interest
in becoming a Head Coach. It would be great PR.
He has the intangibles, not sure about the desire.
O'Brien
March 24th, 2010
11:29 am
Grandad,
Barring a collapse in the playoffs, I would resign Woodson, because the grass is not always greener on the other side. Why replace a proven HC with an up and coming assistant?
That being said, I do like Tom Thibodeau. And both Byron Scott and Avery Johnson are out there.
I would love to see Hakeem be our big man coach though. Maybe he can do for Al and Josh what Ewing is trying to do with Howard.
Fundamentals
March 24th, 2010
11:33 am
Tonight is the night to prove we are watching film, we can compete and we have a chance. If we pull the same, weak, no effort, no balls performace then stick a fork in the boys for the playoffs.
I can hear my buddies ribbing me already for sounding harsh, but it’s reality. Whomever wins the ECF will have to beat Orlando. We’ll meet MIL, CLE, then ORL. Tough road, but winnable if we give 100% physically and mentally.
All the talk about records and getting the 3 seed doesn’t matter. We can’t catch ORL so we won’t be getting homecourt in the second. We’re a definite 4 seed barring a collapse. Beating Boston in the chase for records doesn’t matter if you can’t get the higher seed. Face it, we’re playing for pride and playoff preparation.
Orlando and Cleveland are our measuring stick. I’ve preached giving chances and developing players all season. Time is now to step out as MEN and show us what you’re made of. It’s playoff time! Time to separate the pretenders from the contenders! We all have our opinion of who we might be.
Time is now, no excuses!
Fundamentals
March 24th, 2010
11:36 am
O’Brien – Dream would definitely be an awesome tool for Josh and Al to utilize. He’s a proven winner with heart. I like Ewing, but he never got his teams over the hump. Dream won 2 rings with equal/less talent. Good call.
Fundamentals
March 24th, 2010
11:44 am
We missed our chance at Doc just before signing Woodson. Steve Smith would be a good PR face, but I’ve never heard him mentioned in the coaching conversation. My wife longs for the days when we had Smitty commentating instead of hearing all about the heat checks and nimbers. Sorry Nique, but you need some coaching from Smitty.
Coaching debate is a situation I’m glad I can give 2 cents, but have no responsibility in making. I’m hopeful we’ll compete well in the 2nd round and maybe have a shot at the ECF. With that said we’ll most likely have Woodson on board in a new deal. He’s due if he can get this team to the next level. Many agree or disagree. It’s a tough decision, but I believe the man needs to be rewarded and respected for meeting and exceeding expectations each year. Expectations are set by ownership and management, not unrealistic fans with agendas. He’s met all expectations thus far. His next challenge is round 2 in the playoffs. If he fails miserably in the second round, by all means explore the opportunities, but remember, the grass ain’t always greener.
Main key for the offseason is adding some key position coaches would be nice. Adding a few peices such as a strong defensive/penetrating point guard and strong rebounding/defensive center to our rotation are critical to our future. All that will depend on what Joe decides to do? Ball is in his court. We’ll see what he’s all about this summer.
Wabe
March 24th, 2010
11:52 am
I’m be at tonight’s game. All I ask from the Hawks is to go out and make this a good basketball game. I’m tired of us looking like we don’t even belong on the same court as Orlando.
Ken Strickland
March 24th, 2010
12:24 pm
We’ve suffered 6 consecutive beatdowns by the Magic, and that doesn’t include preseason. It’s past the time for Woodson to try something other than the same old thing against them, which hasn’t come close to working. He needs to get it through his thick stubborn head that we need to abandon his beloved switching DEF against them and change the lineup.
He should stop being a gutless coward of a HC and bench Marvin, move Smoove to SF and insert RMorris @ PF against them. That move would automatically create favorable mismatches for us at PF and SF, and would put a lot of DEF pressure on DHoward to protect the basket against RMorris, JSmith and AHorford.
While SF MBarnes is an excellent defender, he’s no match against Smoove in the paint. RMorris, and his polished inside moves would eat PF RLewis alive in the paint. Howard would be forced to drop back off Horford to provide help, and that’s when Horford and JJ would kill them with their midrange scoring ability.
We should pressure them full court to make their frontline come out and assist in getting the ball across halfcourt and take time off the clock. That move alone would force them getting into their OFF sets, as well as take away any sideline communictions and play calling from the sidelines, since everyone would have to concentrate on getting the ball across halfcourt.
We should let Horford, JSmith and RMorris go after DHoward relentlessly. You want to make him work hard on DEF, try to get him in foul trouble and/or force their other defenders to collapse and help him in the lane. Other than DHoward, should we really be so concerned about RLewis, MBarnes, JNelson and VCarter’s ability to set effective picks that we should be afraid to fight over them, rather than switching everything and creating favorable matchups for them?
These young, quick, fast, athletic and talented Hawks have reached the point in their development where what they now need most from their HC, Woodson has consistently demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to provide.
O'Brien
March 24th, 2010
12:41 pm
Ken S,
I agree with changing up our defense, but I would keep the same starting lineup. Randolph Morris does not get enough PT to warrant a start against the Magic.
Play Howard straight up and try not to give up any dunks (foul him if you have to, and make him earn him at the FT line). Foul Gortat too. They are both .60 – .65% FT shooters. I hope Mario is in street clothes, because we will need Collins and Morris to commit their fouls.
Do not leave the shooters to double, because they will make you pay, and we need everybody to crash the boards. Do not switch on defense if it ends up being a mismatch. Who wants to see Bibby on Lewis, or Josh on Jameer? Hawks need to adjust their switch all the time philosophy, and pick and choose when to switch.
Every team in the division has beaten Orlando at least once, while we lose to them by an average of 22 points? That’s unacceptable, Woody and Hawks players. Even if you lose this game tonight, it needs to be close down the stretch.
Coach of the year awards on espn.
“There are a ton of coaches who don’t crack the top five — Atlanta’s Mike Woodson, Utah’s Jerry Sloan, Houston’s Rick Adelman — who are having fine seasons. This list is filled with coaches of teams that are big surprises or had to overcome a lot of adversity”.
Their candidates are Scott Brooks, Scott Skiles, Nate McMillan, Lionel Hollins and Larry Brown.
BullDurham
March 24th, 2010
12:52 pm
The Hawks are capable of BLOWING OUT THE MAGIC TONIGHT. Why? Because like i said yesterday the Magic have a team that is worse than the team from a year ago. Last year the Magic had Hedo Turkelu (one of the five most talented players in the nba) and Rafer Alsen (one of the best point guards in the nba subbing for the injured Jamir Nelson). Last season the Magic won 59 games (nearly 60). They let Alsten and Turkelu go and compensated by picking up a horrible Vince Carter (who has allways underachieved his entire career). Picking Carter was a definite downgrade for the team and gave the Hawks a chance to win the southeast division. Unfortortunately for the Hawks, the Hawks didnt take advantage of it and lost about 10 games that they should have won. This year the Magic wont win as many because the team is not as good. The Hawks should have won 60 games this season and should have won the southeast division; but because Woody is still coaching them with his ghetto coaching style, the Hawks will finish winning between 44-48 games which is pathetic in light of their talent. The Hawks are capable of blowing out the magic tonight. Will they do it? No. The Hawks will get blown out by at least 30 points or more because they have a rotten coach and the players have no heart at all.
Wabe
March 24th, 2010
12:55 pm
Feed Horford early and often. Period.
I think the best way to neutralize their size is to get Dwight in foul trouble. We tend to get too far away from the rim when we play Orlando. Too many jumpers. Feed Horford early and often in this game to see if he can get Dwight into foul troule early.
I don’t want to see a gaurd-dominated game. Our BIGS have been non-existent in games vs. the Magic, and I’ll assume that their size bothers us. It also doesn’t help when you have a guy like Rashard at the 4 who can stretch the floor, which moves Smoove (our shotblock specialist) out towards the 3-point line.
It’s obvious we struggle to matchup defensively with Orlando, and this hurts because we’re an up-tempo team that thrives off miss shots. But, stops are hard to come by against the Magic. This leaves us stuck in the half-court on offense, and we don’t attack the paint against them as much as we need to. Guys like Jamal and JJ settle for jumpers because Big Dwight is occupying the lane. Everything we do inside is altered (from JJ’s floater in the lane to Jamal taking a guy off the dribble). We instantly become a jumpshooting team. We’ve got to find ways to get points. THE BIGS MUST BE INVOLVED!
PatrickTabler
March 24th, 2010
12:58 pm
Key Point: Having coach Mike Woodsen coach the Hawks is almost as bad as having Mike Vick coaching them. Both are underqualified to coach what they are incapable of coaching. At least if Vick were coaching the Hawks you could rest assured they would be a fast-paced, running and gunning team and would be running the fast break all the time.
terrell
March 24th, 2010
1:17 pm
Obrien ,what has Carlisle done with that same team?
terrell
March 24th, 2010
1:21 pm
And I’m not the biggest Avery Johnson fan, I was just making a point.
HawksFan11
March 24th, 2010
1:23 pm
Fundamentals
March 24th, 2010
11:33 am
Now that was well said.
GO HAWKS!
terrell
March 24th, 2010
1:23 pm
And yall no good and Darn well that STERN WASN’T GOING TO LET SHAQ AND WADE GET SWEPT. IT WAS AVERY COACHING AGAINST RILEY AND THE REFS AFTER THE MAVS TOOK THE 1ST 2 GAMES..
KingCobra
March 24th, 2010
1:28 pm
Wabe: Good Blog. You are absolutely right about Horford. That is why i think the Hawks are vastly superior this season to last season because #1) they have jamal craford who is instant offense (18pts a game) #2) Al Horford is so much better and much more mature; he is lethal down low and #3) Josh Smith is so much better, and is probably the most improved player on the team and plays now within his talents. If the Hawks use Horford as a weapon against Howard down low, Howard will get into foul trouble and the Hawks should have their way against the Magic. THE HAWKS SHOULD DOMINATE AGAINST THE MAGIC AND IM EXPECTING THEM TO DO SO TONIGHT.
GMAN013
March 24th, 2010
1:38 pm
Hey guys here is an interesting article on why the Hawks lose to the Magic so bad
http://www.hoopinionblog.com/?gcid=C12289×022>kw=Hoopinion
JeJe
March 24th, 2010
1:39 pm
Don’t let northcyde sway your opinion. The guy thinks we’re an elite team and that we can make it past the ECF.
He thinks that we match up well vs. the elite teams and that we have a shot of beating them. Orlando OWNS us in every facet of the game — Horford has made it clear he hates playing defense and guarding the big man — watch how he played vs. Duncan for more information — no, his stat line doesn’t tell you !@#$. He had no idea how to play the P&R and the idiot Woodson ran TWO plays where Horford iso’ed on Duncan — are you serious?
And Philips Arena is hardly a home advantage. We are just a good home team now, as is evident by our losses to Miami, twice to the Knicks, OKC, and our pathetic performance in the playoffs vs. Cleveland last year
Done in 2nd round in 4 or 5
VenomSpitter
March 24th, 2010
1:47 pm
Who actually thinks beat the Magic 2nite. I mean seriously.
CherylWilson
March 24th, 2010
1:54 pm
I think the Hawks will CLOBBER the Magic tonight if Al Horford runs wild in the paint like an angry bull and drives recklessly towards the basket either stuffing it home or picking up fouls going to the line. That strategy will get Dwight Howard into foul trouble and put the Magic on their heels all night long. Hawks should win by 40 points tonight.
Jay Dubu
March 24th, 2010
1:58 pm
The Hawks have to close out games better than they have this season. They should have at least 7 more wins that they have.
The Spurs played the Hawks on Sunday, and went and beat OK City on Monday. They are an older team, and had the energy to come back on a back to back game.
I think that OK City is a better team than the Bucks, and the Hawks had less of a distance to travel than the Spurs, so that excuse (reason) goes by the wayside.
There’s some intangible missing from this team, and until they can get it on a consistant bases, they’re not going to compete night in and night out with the elite teams in the NBA.
Let’s Go Hawks, and beat Orlando tonight!!!
SWAT Native
March 24th, 2010
1:59 pm
Venom Spitter,
I think the Hawks finally beat the Magic tonight – and I’ll be at the game trying to help them. They’re overdue just like they were overdue to beat the Spurs.
VenomSpitter
March 24th, 2010
2:01 pm
Well I’m glad you are optimistic SWAT Native but I know you wouldn’t bet money on the Hawks winning now would you.
Nacho
March 24th, 2010
2:05 pm
I wonder what (if) goes through Woody’s head before a big game? What strategies (if any) are pondered?
Fundamentals
March 24th, 2010
2:06 pm
We need solid effort on both ends. Moving Smoove to the 3 and going big would allow him more time to rebound and defend instead of being pulled out by Lewis. I don’t think we’ve got a solid big to start to give us that opportunity. I preached getting Morris, Collins and ZaZa groomed for this moment. Even preached signing a big on waivers or from the D-League just for athleticism, boards and D, but it didn’t happen. Nice try Ken, but it won’t happen cause we’re not there yet.
We need a monster game from all of our bigs to survive tonight. It starts and ends in the middle. We lose every shootout we enter – even against Golden State and New York. What makes them think they can outshoot the Magic? It all starts on D & ends with the boards.
We have a chance to win a close game. Only way there will be a blowout is the same one we saw the last 6 games. It all started with the surprise beat-down we gave them in their home opener. From that night they play us with a vengence. We’ve never responded.
When you get punched, punch back or at least quit crying for your Mama! MAN UP! Time is NOW!
VenomSpitter
March 24th, 2010
2:12 pm
The thing is the Hawks imo are probably the worst 3pt defensive team in the league. Even if you told them that a team was only gonna shoot 3s they would leave them wide open.
STAY ON THE DAMN 3 PT SHOOTERS. IT AIN’T THAT HARD.
SWAT Native
March 24th, 2010
2:15 pm
Venom Spitter,
I wouldn’t bet money on the Hawks winning, but only because it’s illegal in Georgia.
Fundamentals
March 24th, 2010
2:17 pm
Orlando presents a matchup problem because, like Ken said, needs a different approach than the switching defense. We leave them open because we keep switching. We’re slow, we give them mismatches and boom we give up open 3’s or easy mismatches to Dwight.
To beat Orlando we need a different scheme. Man to man – featuring hard fouls on Dwight or a 3-2 zone with hard fouls on Dwight. Either way we need to commit to solid, strong D from Horford, ZaZa, Collins and Morris tonight 1 on 1 and everyone else locking down man to man or in zone to hold the perimeter. We can’t help, we can’t effectively double. They are too good and too fast for that. They’ve proven it repeatedly.
VenomSpitter
March 24th, 2010
2:20 pm
I hope that Woody does somethin different this game. Like a Lineup changs. Or a different defensive scheme.
Jay Dubu
March 24th, 2010
2:30 pm
Thats so funny…
Didn’t the Pistons win the championship with Rip Hamilton, Prince, Sheed, etc! The Hawks can play with any team in the league, but they have to do it consistantly to make tye finals, and to win the title.
It looks as if they sometimes lose their focus on defence, and they must have offensive plays to execute other than the iso.
vava74
March 24th, 2010
2:38 pm
Ken,
RandMo will not even dress tonight. We need West to provide perimeter defense to close quarters and he has proven to be useful as a utility man in that role.
RandMo has not seen enough daylight to warrant a start. Although I get your logic, I don’t think it is feasible since he is so rusty and mentally out of game shape that it would be Lewis eating him alive and not the opposite.
It’s bewildering why we keep on dragging this kid back and forth in street clothes when he could be seeing some daylight in Utah with our affiliate NBDL team.
OB,
As I said above, RandMo will not dress.
As for Ewing being responsible for much of Howard’s improvement, I don’t buy that. Ewing was not a polished low post player, relying a lot on jump shots and dunks more than in actual low post moves.
He was not good enough to lace Hakeem’s shoes and I think his contribution towards Howard’s game is limited, at best.
To be frank, Howard’s offensive game still s*cks big time and his production is materially linked to the refs allowing him to push and shove at will in a way that I can only qualify as sickening.
As for Hakeem, I have no idea why he is not earning millions as a special assistant somewhere since his moves were unstoppable.
Josh picked up a bit and should have gone back two more years to continue his apprenticeship.
At least one or two times a game Josh manages to coordinate himself and execute a perfect low post move and that clearly came from his short experience with Hakeem.
Al would also improve tremendously. His biggest problems is that NO ONE buys his pump fakes and he gets blocked or bothered going up a lot when he is down low.
Hakeem was listed many times as being 7′0” and 255lbs however he was closer to 6′10” according to more accurate reports which means that with more polished low post moves, Al could also be a monster.
Rod from College Park
March 24th, 2010
2:53 pm
For all of you who think we should just dump the ball down low to Horford, guess what. Dwight Howard is one of the best defensive big men in the game. Horford’s strength is that 10 to 15 foot jumper, which would draw Howard out of the paint. He will not have much success posting Howard and trying to score that way. The one guy who has killed us this year, who no one has mentioned is Jason Williams. Can’t let him destroy us tonight.
vava74
March 24th, 2010
3:01 pm
Rod,
Almost everyone who has mite of speed and a reasonable outside shot has been grilling us.
Our switching defense works well many times but it also converts scrubs into Allstars in as many others.
Indeed J-Williams killed us, but so did Anthony Johnson…
This means that we don’t need to focus on player A or B but to play sound man to man defense against teams which have a strong perimeter offense in order to avoid getting killed like we did against the Bucks.
Yes, Salmons was on fire, but the crucial element was AGAIN our poor perimeter defense and the three 3 pointers in a row, that cut our lead to almost nothing, sandwiching our 2 or 3 typically bad Hawks’ possessions: if I am not wrong, Jamal, Josh and Bibby missed from 3 during that period instead of driving and getting some easy baskets or fouls.
Ken Strickland
March 24th, 2010
4:46 pm
ROD FOR CP-you obviously think just like Woodson and share his FEAR FACTOR mentality. The teams that have defeated the Magic challenged him and his shotblocking ability and successfully got him into foul trouble. THEY DIDN’T DO THAT BY BEING AFRAID OF HIS SHOTBLOCKING ABILITY AND RESORTING TO SHOOTING JUMPSHOTS EXCLUSIVELY, LIKE YOU AND HC MWOODSON SEEM TO BELIEVE.
VALVA74-you must keep in mind that Hakeem developed his quick feet, and thus his unbelievably quick ballet type moves, from growing up playing soccer in Nigeria. There’s no way Smoove can develop that kind of footwork at this point in his career. I’d be satisfied if he’d introduce himself to the square about the rim and bank more of his shot attempts, like TDuncan.
Instead of always trying to force his way to the rim, he should show some of the patience he said he admired in TDuncan and position himself close to the lane so he can shoot 6-8′ bankshots. When he goes toward the middle of the lane and gets cut off, he should then spin hard and go up and shoot a bank shot, or fake the shot and draw a foul. If the defender doesn’t take the fake, being left handed, he’s in perfect position to bank a jumphook.
terrell
March 24th, 2010
7:25 pm
LMAO at the Hawks!