Well, it turns out the Hawks haven’t clinched a spot in the playoffs after all. Elias Sports Bureau called the league to tell them that the Hawks would lose a tiebreaker if they lost all of their remaining games and finished in four-way tie for the final playoffs spot. Well, OK, then. The Hawks will clinch tonight if they win or Chicago loses to Houston. Really.
Anyway, at the moment the playoffs bracket looks like this. Assuming the Celtics are going to win the Atlantic, which is a safe assumption, they would win a tiebreaker with the Hawks. From NBA.com:
TIEBREAKER BASIS:
(-) Tie breaker not needed (better overall winning percentage)
(1) Division leader wins tie from team not leading a division
(2) Head-to-head won-lost percentage
(3) Division won-lost percentage
(4) Conference won-lost percentage
(5) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff teams, own conference
(6) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff teams, other conference
(7) Net Points, all games

Suddenly solid vet John Salmons, not super rook Brandon Jennings, is the story for the Bucks.
The Bucks loom as a potential playoff opponent. Normally the Hawks might not have too much concern about a team that hasn’t been anywhere near them in the standings and can’t match their talent. But these are not normal circumstances. The Bucks are just 38-30 but they are 14-3 since the All-Star break. More to the point, they are 14-2 since adding John Salmons in a trade.
You might remember how Salmons lit up the Hawks for 32 points during Milwaukee’s overtime loss at Philips Arena and did a respectable job checking J.J. until he got Iso-Joed at the end. What you may not remember is how Salmons joined the Bulls in a trade last season along with Brad Miller and helped catapult them to the playoffs. Now my man Charlie G at the Journal Sentinel notes Salmons is having a similar effect on the Bucks since the Bulls unloaded him to clear space for the summer free agent bonanza.
“When we were talking about making a move, we looked at him, and still do, as just a good, all-around pro guard,” Bucks coach Scott Skiles said. “He can post up a little bit. He shoots the ball well enough. He can put it on the floor and get to the rim. He can dish it if necessary. He’s a solid defender. He’s a professional and has a real calm demeanor out there, and that has helped our guys.”
Since the Bucks and Hawks strangely didn’t meet for the first time until the late date of Feb. 28, the Hawks can measure themselves against the new-look Bucks and not the team that was sputtering along at 24-28 before Salmons arrived. Looking at the game-by-game efficiency numbers, the Bucks seem to be a better team offensively with Salmons –they’ve topped 100 points in offensive efficiency in 13 of 16 of games with him after doing so in just 31 of 68 previously. Their rugged defense also hasn’t appeared to skip a beat on defense–they’ve held 11 of 16 opponents below 100 points in defensive efficiency with Salmons after doing so in 21 of 68 games before his arrival.
It should be noted that the Salmons Bucks didn’t go a good job stopping the Hawks in their first meeting and have had similar problems with the better offensive teams. But the Bucks also have more offensive punch with Salmons. This is all along way of saying the Bucks would be a dangerous opponent for the Hawks to face in the playoffs.
That’s assuming the Hawks really, truly clinch a postseason berth at some point.
MC
371 comments Add your comment
Big Ray
March 22nd, 2010
10:14 pm
This may be nerve-wracking, but it’s exciting.
And I greatly prefer it to watching us melt down over the course of 5-8 minutes, with no hope in sight.
J.J.M.
March 22nd, 2010
10:14 pm
hawks cant go overtime with josh and his 5 fouls
Hawks Fan In Jax
March 22nd, 2010
10:14 pm
Man i smell another Overtime game
Rod from College Park
March 22nd, 2010
10:14 pm
Big Ray,
I’ve been here.
HawksFan11
March 22nd, 2010
10:14 pm
two bad decisions in a row by Joe.
Melvin
March 22nd, 2010
10:14 pm
Please no fade away jumpers
Big Ray
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
heh heh heh…praying for overtime…
VenomSpitter
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
Wow way to go clutch Joe
HawksFan11
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
That was pure selfishness
Hawk n the Ham
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
Where’s the alley-oop to Smoove play, when you need one?
J.J.M.
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
lol and the ball stayed in joe hand
Blast
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
Why did Joe take so long to move?
Taylor
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
horford was open
Najeh Davenpoop
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
Doesn’t look good now. Ridnour is near automatic at the line.
I would have liked to see the Hawks take it quicker than that.
Jody
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
PASS THE BALL!!!!!
Sautee
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
And we were sharing the ball so well earlier.
VenomSpitter
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
Where are all the folks who act like Joe is always so clutch
Rod from College Park
March 22nd, 2010
10:15 pm
Same thing makes you laugh, makes you cry. Joe has to pass the ball.
Hawks Fan In Jax
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
damn, no imagination on that play call
Melvin
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
I will ask again tonight. Why dont Joe use the backboard more????
HawksFan11
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
Zero passes.
VenomSpitter
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
Another Choke
Big Ray
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
Rod ,
I know. But I have to call your name every now and then just to make sure.
Wabe
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
I don’t know why we’ve kept Jamal out in the cold in these last second possessions.
Sautee
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
I guess “earlier” was the key word
Hawks Fan In Jax
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
Joe is clutch
Cedric
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
Why was nobody crashing the damn boards on Joe last shot
VenomSpitter
March 22nd, 2010
10:16 pm
Joe even MJ passed sometimes u ballhog
Hawks Fan In Jax
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
Man these close games are killin me
Najeh Davenpoop
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
I’m not gonna come down on them too hard for choking this game away, after playing 4 games in 5 nights, but choke they did. They slacked off on defense and let Salmons get into a rhythm, and the rest was history. Milwaukee is a good enough team that you can’t give them openings like that.
welikebaseball2
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
Iso Joe, Iso Joe, Iso Joe, Iso Joe, etc.
terrell
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
That was a horrible foul on Salmons by JJ.
Hawk n the Ham
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
That was a foul. Crawford never comes up that short without contact.
Hawks Fan In Jax
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
Guess we gonna hear all the Let Joe Go blogs now
bigdave
March 22nd, 2010
10:17 pm
“well you’re not gonna get that call”
-Dominique Wilkins
VenomSpitter
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
ADD THIS TO THE LIST OF CHOKES
Sautee
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
I HATE losing a winnable game.
Maavelous
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
If Iso Joe can get that max contract from the Knicks it will just be the latest in a long string of bad contracts for that crummy organization. The Hawks would mis him a lot but he’s no superstar.
Wabe
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
I guess it is what it is.
Another loss you can chalk up to poor 4th quarter execution on both ends.
Hawks Fan In Jax
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
Hawks will be fine, bucks will lose to us in 5 games, just defend the 3 better down the stretch
Blast
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
Happy for Bucks fans. Sad for Hawks’s. That was Hawks’s game to win, even down to the wire. No ball movement on the last play, and that’s what got Hawks the lead.
Najeh Davenpoop
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
6/13 at the free throw line and a 13-7 deficit on the offensive glass killed the Hawks tonight.
Taylor
March 22nd, 2010
10:18 pm
That ending made no sense
Hawk n the Ham
March 22nd, 2010
10:19 pm
Woody put Joe back in there at 10:36 in the 4th quarter. How would your legs be?
VenomSpitter
March 22nd, 2010
10:19 pm
Joe commited probably the dumbest and most obvious foul of all time
JeJe
March 22nd, 2010
10:19 pm
If we don’t resign JJ, can we just not go over the cap? We’d be so screwed – there’s no way we could go over cap by signing outside players?
Big Ray
March 22nd, 2010
10:19 pm
Toast of the town becomes the tarred and feathered one.
Sautee is right. We were sharing the ball well. Guess we just couldn’t have that at the end. Well, I won’t blame Woody for that one.
Horford was open. Yep, and we ignored a guy who hit all five of the shot attempts he got.
Sighhhh
Rod from College Park
March 22nd, 2010
10:19 pm
Big Ray,
OK. Just making sure. Great game by Marvin huh. Wonder why I don’t get excited after he has a good game.
J.J.M.
March 22nd, 2010
10:20 pm
I wish joe would share the ball and let other people help
JeJe
March 22nd, 2010
10:20 pm
Why does Jamal get no shots anymore? Anytime jamal and Joe are in, Jamal is just Joe’s !@#%$