Hawks squawks: Hawks 112, Pistons 99

- Ken Sugiura sitting in for MC.

- I’m curious how you grade the game. To me, the most impressive thing was the second quarter. After jumping out early, I figured the Hawks would let Detroit back in the game, but they turned it up a notch, which, as you know better than I do, has not always been the case. One play that stands out is Jamal Crawford D’ing up Ben Gordon out beyond the 3-point line, poking the ball away and cruising in for a dunk.

- Jamal: “It’s contagious. I think that’s a part of my game, going towards the playoffs, I want to be a better all-around player than I was at the start of the season. I will be. I vow to be.”

- Real strong defensive showing in the first half. It seemed like every Detroit shot was contested. Lots of deflections.

- However, the Hawks got a little lax in the second half defensively. Of course, as was repeated a few times in the locker room, all teams go on runs. But not all runs have to lead to a team scoring 58 points in the second half, as the Pistons did, which was their fourth-best second half of the season.

- Mike Woodson: “If we can beat them by 40, we would have, but they played their butts off in the second half. Like I said, they’re professionals, too.”

- But perhaps the takeaway is that the Hawks got back on it and closed out the game strong.

- Al Horford: “We’ve had our misfortunes in giving up leads. Even though we blew a pretty significant lead, we were still able to hold them off and finish the game out the right way.”

- Interesting quote from John Kuester: “They know how to turn it on when they have to, and that’s going to be important, because as time goes on and you get ready for the playoffs, you have to be prepared to turn it for 48 minutes.”

- Will Bynum with his take on one of your favorite topics: “I think their switching defense gave us a problem early on in the game. It made it difficult for us in our offense, especially on the wings.”

- Josh Smith on Zaza Pachulia’s behind-the-back pass to Joe Smith: “It was nice. I know we’re definitely going to hear about that for a couple weeks.  He’’s not going to let that go.”

- Whaddya think?

190 comments Add your comment

Grandad

March 13th, 2010
11:45 pm

From previous blog:

Response to northcyde:

I’ve been away watching ball all day.
I mentioned that back in the 50’s…inferring…that I played once upon a time. Admittedly, I wasn’t very good. That’s why I bacame a coach.
Loved the game, studied it, absorbed all I could for the past 40 yrs.
After a lifetime in the game, one learns not to waste time in practice
on situations that will never occur in a game. I understand, hand eye coordination, etc., but any drill should be game specific.
As for Josh:
Why hasn’t Wdsn taught him fundamental footwork, how to shoot FT’s,
How to shoot a mid range jumper in rhythm (and why doesn’t he run
plays designed to do so). I’ll stop there for now.
I’m sure Wdsn did a good job teaching Josh to:
*jump high *run fast *block shots *dunk and many other things which require hand eye coordination.

Sautee – I’m not sure many HS coaches run 3 man weave anymore.
I’m fairly confident it’s a staple for AAU teams.

rusty

March 13th, 2010
11:58 pm

woody is definetly not a smart coach

rob

March 14th, 2010
12:17 am

at least they finished it off the right way

Big Ray

March 14th, 2010
12:17 am

The Hawks win. We love this!

Grandad ,

Sorry, but you just don’t understand.

Woodson is a very good coach. The Hawks are a very good team. You are an unrealistic human being with very unrealistic expectations. You are unbalanced and emotional. Resistance is futile, you WILL be assimilated.

Now get back into line with the other disobedient lemmings on this blog and stop trying to use your brain, or have your own opinion/view point. One will be provided for you, and that is the one you and the rest of the heathen masses should adhere to. You infidel, you.

;)

Big Ray

March 14th, 2010
12:21 am

Or put another way….

Does YOUR boss have to teach you how to use a stapler? Or how about a keyboard or an ink pen? Do you work in sales or the corporate world? Does any of this have anything to do at all with basketball?

No, but it’s a great way to say it’s not Woody’s fault and he shouldn’t have to teach his players anything…..

Man, I have GOT to leave this rum alone. It takes away all my inhibitors…

;)

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
12:37 am

Big Ray:

Huh?

britney spears

March 14th, 2010
12:49 am

Leave Grandad alone!

Big Ray…..you just like to hear yourself talk, but you make NO SENSE AT ALL!

william cranman

March 14th, 2010
12:51 am

Hey Ken,
What ever happened to Sekou Smith?

rob

March 14th, 2010
1:10 am

at least the Knicks whipped the Mavericks, Hawks arent the only ones

Barry

March 14th, 2010
1:12 am

KEN,

Would you PLEASE EXPLAIN what would happen if Boston and Atlanta finish tied for the 3rd best record in the East? I KEEP hearing Bob and Dominique say Boston would hold the tie-breaker because they will win the Atlantic despite us beating them 4 times? Is this true? From what I read, I thought we would win the tie-breaker since we won the head-to-head matchup.

sam'l

March 14th, 2010
1:16 am

I confess, I was playing Britney. So yeah, I personally attacked “Big Ray”

Grandad had a perfectly good point. Josh (who is playing brilliantly and who has grown immensely) SHOULD know how to shoot free throws and how to hit a mid-range jumper. It wouldn’t hurt a “great coach” like Woodson to maybe direct Josh a few feet over to Mark Price to learn how to do that so that when Atlanta trails Cleveland by 1 in a critical playoff game,, the Cavs don’t purposely guard everyone but Josh and them foul him. Or watch his midrange jumper clank off the rim. Plus in a zone I would think it would be a huge plus to have everyone on the floor make their midrange jumpshot.

So, I guess when somebody sees something and has a suggestion,that makes perfect sense, the appropriate response is to absorb it and go with it

Woodson doesn’t make the critical adjustments that win games. He is NOT a tactical coach. Big Ray pretends that he himself is a tactician but apparently he can’t see OBVIOUS things in front of his own eyes or extrapolate that out to real situations.

I’m asking myself why this should be so annoying…….

Barry

March 14th, 2010
1:29 am

Big Ray, if you think WOODSON IS A GOOD COACH, I don’t know how much CREDIBILITY you really have. Good coaches:

1. Wouldn’t allow Josh to shoot 20 foot jumpers
2. Would have an answer when teams switch to zone defense
3. Would have Teague playing with more confidence
4. Would have guys in motion on offense
5. Would run more plays to Horford and Josh IN THE POST
6. Wouldn’t allow constant switching on defense which causes players to be out of postion to rebound

Woodson is NOT a good coach. The progression of the Hawks is NATURAL, meaning I could have coached the Hawks the past 4 years and they would have improved. The Hawks play well most of the time IN SPITE OF Woodson, NOT BECAUSE of Woodson.

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
1:33 am

sam’l:

You think that was directed @ me or was it sarcasm?
Quite frankly,I’m dumbfounded.

willy

March 14th, 2010
1:44 am

I may be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that BIG RAY was being sarcastic.

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
1:52 am

Barry & sam’l:

I’ve been quite outspoken about Wdsn’s coaching accumen.
My statement above had nothing to do with tonight’s game
but a response to [nc] who came back @ me for an earlier
rant on Sat. To my knowledge Big Ray has always been most
cordial on this board. Thus my dumbfoundedness.
Now, back to Wdsn, it would be redundant & repetitive to
list his shortcomings. Although, a rebuke from Big Ray or
anyone else will not contain my thoughts in the future.
The one really positive trait our young men have is they
seem to be good citizens. Wdsn, being the one constant,
during their tenure must get some of the credit.

Ramon

March 14th, 2010
3:26 am

Barry, how can you consider Woody not to be a good coach? You stated you could have coach this team the last 4 years with favorable results. You think you could coach as good as a playoff tested coach, yet you’re on this blog and no on anyone’s staff in the league? …..

I don’t like many things that Woody does in terms of game adjustments. But EVERY coach has their own flaws. I don’t understand how some fans want it both ways. Some of you guys scream that ASG is cheap and the GM’s haven’t brought in enough talent on the bench. But that SAME roster Woody takes it and advances to the second round with 3 starters injured! So you’re telling me he’s doing better than over 20 coaches in the league in terms of winning, with a less favorable roster, but he’s not a good coach. —Can we spell contradictory—

Philadelphia and Washington was said to have better and deeper rosters than the Hawks when the season started. Flip Saunders and Eddie Jordan names were mentioned on this very board as great guys to replace Woody because they utilize structured offenses. So now into the season, not only have Woody lead his team to more than 15 victories more than both of those teams, the entire year his offense has left the Hawks with the most efficient, least offense, and highest scoring team that the Hawks have had since moving to Atlanta.

Then you have fans who say Woody plays favorites and leaves Marvin and Bibby in the starting lineup when he shouldn’t. Well if I was a coach, and a lineup had me winning 65% of the time we play, I think I would be reluctant to make changes to the starting lineup. When was the last time you remember the Hawks winning more than they lose. The Hawks just as many wins against playoff teams as they do against the lower teams.

On last season, there was no team in the second round of playoffs who’s team salary was within $9 million close to being as low as Atlanta’s.

By the way, that bad coach Woody has his team in a better playoff seeding than even Doc Rivers who’s team is a contender.

Barry

March 14th, 2010
3:36 am

Ramon,

The Hawks are a good team because they have a talented roster in a WEAK eastern conference. Name one game where you can say the Hawks won because Woody OUTCOACHED someone. We in because we are better and more talented than most teams. Additionally, Doc Rivers head headed for a platter before the Celtics aquired Garnett and Allen. You are CONFUSING a good record with GOOD COACHING. It’s not the same thing!

Barry

March 14th, 2010
3:37 am

SORRY ABOUT THE TYPOS, TIME TO GO TO BED!

NCBravesFan

March 14th, 2010
6:17 am

Grandad: I thought Big Ray was being sarcastic, and the intended targets of his post were the folks who tend to gloss over some of the apparent issues the Hawks are having on defense (among other things).

(Sarcasm does tend to get served in healthy helpings with Rum, from what I know.) :)

The Grinch

March 14th, 2010
6:58 am

Big Ray’s posts were about as obviously sarcastic as they could well be, and just in case nobody got it he even added a winking smiley face. At least that’s MY take, and no, I have no idea who he is. Just wondering why everyone’s jumping on him.

Woodson is absolutely awful. He would be a decent defensive assistant on a team loaded with veterans, but as a HC of a team full of young and dynamic players who need to be taught and motivated he’s perhaps the worst possible choice in the NBA.

Let's Get This Straight

March 14th, 2010
7:26 am

“Like I said, they’re professionals, too.””
LOL Woodson acting like we’re the best team and we’re playing worse teams.

No, we lost to Detroit without its 3 best players 2 months ago

Idiot

Let's Get This Straight

March 14th, 2010
7:30 am

These quotes are killing me.

Joe saying we can’t get relaxed in the 3rd quarter. If that’s so, WTF have the Hawks done the last 4 years? Intentionally get relaxed?

So many typos in this article too

Yeah

March 14th, 2010
7:31 am

Yeah, leave grandBytch alone. She is trying to get some glory for herself and pretend that the months of stupidity, ignorance and folly on this site can be legitimized and justified by a time 40 years ago, when dinosaurs roamed the earth. GrandBytch tried out for a team and was cut in the first 5minutes,”get the hell out of here, we are trying to win”, coaches reply).

From that point Grandbytch went out and created his own players, team, league. His was the only team in the league so they never lost. His players was made up of mostly stray cats and dogs, but again, they never lost.

So now, after six months of experience as a Hawks blogger Grand bytch is ready to critique Woodson who in his short head coaching career made last years top ten in the coaches poll and this year will be a top five and a serious candidate for the Coach of the Year award.

Good job Woodson!

Get 2 teams in your leagues Grand bytch aka The Grinch.

Extendz my Woody.

Yeah

March 14th, 2010
7:41 am

EXCUSE ME?

Doc Rivers is coach a recent NBA championship team that has many “legitimate” present or former allstars, like Pierce, Wallace, Garnett,Ray Allen and not to mention the up and coming Rondo….

With all that talent at his mighty coaching disposal woodson almost always gets that asssss! with one legitimate allstar, JJ.

Woodson has done more with less then almost any coach in the NB-fc-cking A.

EXTENDZ MY WOODY!

Hawk n the Ham

March 14th, 2010
8:58 am

It was nice to see the Hawks put the foot down in the 2nd quarter, after already being up big.

It was nice to see JT0 playing late into the 2nd quarter, penetrating and drawing fouls.

It was nice to not have a hair pulling night watching the Hawks playing ‘down’ to their competition.

It was a nice game. Go HAWKS!!!!

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
11:05 am

Mr. Sugiura . . . I grade the game as a B+

The first half was arguably the best half of basketball we’d played all year. Everybody, and I mean everybody played well. We shot 73% in the first half. We played excellent defense. And like Bynum said, the switching defense definitely gave them problems in the first half. So they get an A+ in the first half.

The 2nd half . . lol. When the Pistons came out and started to get to the rim, I think everybody was saying “here we go again”. They outscored us like 10 – 1 in the first 2 – 3 minutes of the 3rd. That enabled them to quickly cut into the large decifit. We pretty much let them cut 14 points off of that 27 point halftime lead, within the first 8 minutes of the half.

But to the Hawks credit, they hunkered down on defense again, and started to make like difficult for the Pistons again. And JJ finally hit some 2nd half shots, going 6 – 8 FG in the half, and had 7 points in the decisive 11 – 4 run in a 3 minute span in the 4th, that sealed the game.

So if I gave them an A+ for the first half, I’ll have to give them a B- for the 2nd. Can’t give up 58 points to the Pistons in a half, under ANY circumstances. But we didn’t crumble, so that’s a positive for the half.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:15 am

I have yet to check out hot spots for the last few weeks but you have to realize that Josh and Al need to keep working on them 15′ jumpers. Do I wish they would stay away from those 18′ and beyond? – yes. These guys like Howard know they will need to be proficient at some point and extend their range or their careers will be shortened by years. No one can jump forever.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:18 am

Issue 2

I have chose to beat a dead horse. Teague needs 15 minutes and Bibby 20. I will assume if Bibby is hitting his shots the math need not apply. But for most games the math should apply.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:22 am

Issue 3

Win lose whatever, Marvin needs at least 10 attempts and Al 14. No excuse. Just a matter of balance. This does not account for free throws.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:23 am

Issue 4

ZaZa needs to play 16 minutes with either Al or Josh. I hate the Joe Smith and ZaZa together.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:28 am

JJ needs to be replaced by Mario at least two more minutes every game in the third QT. No love for Mario, just we need our All-Star fresher for the end of games.

Zach

March 14th, 2010
11:30 am

Big Ray, you are right on. Some of these people want to find a way to criticize Woodson just because they feel like it. Let me just say, no team, and I repeat NO TEAM, should be up on any other team by 28 points at half time. So the fact that they let the pistons get back in it is not great. But they still won by 13 points. So lets not complain too much. Also they have 43 wins (or 42 wins I’m not sure) so let’s chill.

This is the best hawks team I’ve ever seen, and its the best hawks team we’ve had for a very long time. And you know what, Woodson is at least part of the reason why we’re where we are now.

Finally, I have to respond to Grandad’s comments about Josh Smith where he says:

“Why hasn’t Wdsn taught him fundamental footwork, how to shoot FT’s,
How to shoot a mid range jumper in rhythm (and why doesn’t he run
plays designed to do so).”

Are you serious?!? Did you really just say this after saying you were a coach and a teacher and a basketball god in the last paragraph.

Trivia Question(i.e. look this up and you’ll see how stupid you sound): Who is the current player with the most career points?

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:33 am

Issue 5

Nire is wrong

We should expect our guards like JJ and Jamal to pass the ball in a fine offensive scheme that only works when we are passing the ball. Any ISO should not last longer than 2 sec. I realize that we do a lot of ISO by all of our players – just do it quick.

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
11:37 am

As I’ve been saying all week, the Hawks are mentally tough, even if they don’t play “right” all the time. Hawks have won 8 out of 11 games ( 73% ) . . . and 21 of their last 32 games ( 66% )

After 65 games, these are the top 5 records in Atlanta Hawks history ( not counting St. Louis ):

* 1993 – 94: 46 – 19
* 1986 – 87: 44 – 21
* 1996 – 97: 43 – 22
* 2009 – 10: 42 – 23
* 1985 – 86 . . 1987 – 88 . . 1997 – 98: 40 – 25

( As most die hard Hawk fans should know, not ONE of those teams made it to the Eastern Conference Finals )

With a current .646 winning percentage, the Hawks are tracking to post the 4th best regular season record in Atlanta Hawk history ( not counting the St. Louis years )

The team the 2009 – 10 Hawks are probably most similar to, from a historical franchise perspective, are the 1987 – 88 Hawks, who finished the season 50 – 32. That Hawk team took the Celtics to 7 games in the East Semifinals, before losing in the Garden in that epic Nique vs Bird showdown.

*********************

Team comparison:

1987 – 88 Hawks:

Offensive rating: 5th
Defensive rating: 14th
Pace: 21st out of 23 teams
#4 seed ( lost tiebreaker with Chicago, who also finished with a 50 – 32 record )
Home record: 30 – 11 ( 73% )
Road record: 20 – 21( 48% )

2009 – 10 Hawks:

Offensive rating: 3rd
Defensive rating: 14th
Pace: 27th out of 30 teams
currently the #3 seed ( fighting off Boston for that seed )
Home record: 26 – 7 ( 78% )
Road record: 16 – 16 ( 50% )

*****************

The 1987 – 88 team struggled in the 1st round with a 42 – 40 Milwaukee squad, but did take care of then in Game 5 ( 1st round series back then only went to best of 5 ). Then they went on to face the top seeded Celtics, and battled them to the death.

Just wanted to illustrate how special this season actually is, in case some of you don’t realize this.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:39 am

Issue 6,

I know longer do balance watch. The Team has evolved. Not perfect by any account but not the glareing weakness it was early in the year. Now the new idea is attack the basket. When we do it by all players we do better. We need those foul shots.

PS like always – feed a big – get a win. Love the fact Al is finally getting his shots.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:44 am

Issue 7

We are close to putting this issue to rest. Get the offense to start it’s sets early – every time. This issue is much improved but still rears it’s ugly head when the other team has had a run. We need to push – not slow it down when we blow possessions.

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
11:52 am

Zach . . . Big Ray was being sarcastic. He actually believes none of what he typed.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
11:56 am

Issue 8

The idea JJ needs to take over games. Jamal has the same problem. No problem with either taking shots in the flow of the offense. That is the key word – flow. A pass should not end the offense. Once again a problem that has improved. I love the new direction. Will the engrained DNA of the guards take over when we are down? Prob. Next year I will expect better yet.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
12:01 pm

Issue 9

I have just pointed out a few ideas that might make our team better in the short term. But no matter what happens I love these Hawks and their future potential. Yes we are in year three of a 5 year plan. Josh, Al, ZaZa, Teague and Marvin will improve. We have years of good ball ahead of us. Got to love it.

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
12:03 pm

KevinA . . your points are well taken. The only problem is, when Horford and Smoove face big defensive minded frontlines, most of what you say goes right out the window, because they become less effective.

In the game we lost up in Detroit earlier in the year, Big Ben absolutely destroyed us on the boards, and even scored some points. While Josh and Al did their thing last night, don’t overlook the fact that JJ and Jamal were a combined 17 – 23 FG. On most nights, it’s their ability to create and make shots, that separates us from the rest of the teams in the league.

The balanced concept is great . . but only if those guys are making shots. No way I want Marvin taking 10 shots, if he’s already 1 – 5 FG in the game. He’s not JJ or Crawford. He’s not going to turn it on at the flip of a switch offensively. If he’s hot, then yeah, get him the ball. If not, I simply want him playing defense and rebounding the basketball.

Make no mistake . . when we start facing defensive minded frontlines, the difference is going to be JJ and Jamal. Their ability to take over a game at any given time, is what will propel us in the playoffs.

Ree Roe

March 14th, 2010
12:05 pm

I’ve read alot of comments about how Woody plays his starters too many minutes…well here’s Orlando Magic head coach Stan Van Gundy’s take on bench play & resting/playing his starters:

“Orlando Magic news: Blowout wins give Orlando Magic starters some much-needed rest, Orlando Sentinel, Tania Ganguli

The Buzz: “People always talk about the rest,” Magic coach Stan Van Gundy said, ”but if you’re playing 28, 30 minutes a night and then all of a sudden in the playoffs you want 42 minutes out of a guy, they’re not going to be able to do it.”

I’m not a Coach Woodson fan, but this does make his strategy of playing the starters a ton of minutes make sense.

-REEligiously Roe!!!

Dukester9

March 14th, 2010
12:10 pm

Northcyde I love the facts you gave out in your blog. But what got me is you use the word “special” about this season. Sir thats the problem most Hawks fans are happy with 50 win seasons and 3rd seed playoff. Then to have that “special” to end in the 2nd round of the playoffs. Now Im not here to determine what fans should think is “special”. But from eyes special would be at least making it to the finals and winning 2 games. If we fall short of that sir I have to say this is not a “special” season. Can say its better than what we have saw In the last 10 yrs but my heart lie next championships. Not good seasons.

DJ Augustin and Raymond Felton

March 14th, 2010
12:12 pm

Cant wait to put the Hawks out in the first round, they cant keep us in front of them.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
12:21 pm

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
12:03 pm
KevinA . . your points are well taken. The only problem is, when Horford and Smoove face big defensive minded frontlines, most of what you say goes right out the window, because they become less effective.

My very first point is one that we have not even tried against the “big” teams. Al shooting that 12-15′er to draw the big’s out of the paint.

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
12:22 pm

Point taken Duke. But we’re a franchise that’s not used to winning anything, nor less watching a top10 team. The word “special” is used in context comparable to Hawk seasons of the past, not necessarily in the context of what reaching the NBA Finals would be like.

The facts are that 50 win seasons are rare around here . . especially in the past 10 – 15 years. So if this year’s team gets to 52 – 55 wins, the year ( so far ) has to be categorized as being “special” to Hawk fans.

Ree Roe

March 14th, 2010
12:24 pm

Surprised noone mentioned this, but last night’s win clinched consecutive winning seasons for the Hawks for the first time since 97-98, 98-99

-REEticulated for Roe!

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
12:28 pm

In the game we lost up in Detroit earlier in the year, Big Ben absolutely destroyed us on the boards, and even scored some points.

I understand our rebounding problem with some teams. There are a couple of things we could do that Woody has yet to try. Play Josh at the 3, al at the 2 and ZaZa at center. Play more Marvin and Evans instead of Bibby and Jamal. I think many times JJ and Marvin are ecpected to get back instead of crashing the boards to protect Bibby and Jamal. PS this is why we miss Chills.

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
12:31 pm

The most important thing our frontline needs to do, is rebound the basketball. Scoring is an added bonus, but I’d much rather see a 13 rebound game from Horford, than a 18 point scoring game. The same goes for Smoove. Give me 12 rebounds from him, instead of 20 points.

If both of those guys are hitting the boards, we’re going to be OK in most games. But if we’re getting 18 and 6 from Horford and 20 and 5 from Smoove, the scoring looks nice, but the rebounding would trouble the hell out of me. So a 13 and 13 game from Horford and a 14 and 12 game from Smoove, would be much more desireable.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
12:39 pm

In a switching defense we need Marvin, Bibby and JJ crashing the boards. It has to be a team effort. I will agree Josh and Al could box out better. And Woody keeping them fresher with more bench play.

KevinA

March 14th, 2010
12:45 pm

Watch our guards close next game. Many times they take off to get bk while the ball is in ther air. If your Bibby – why? They will blow by anyways. I would prefer to give up a couple fast breaks and get rebounds.

keno

March 14th, 2010
12:57 pm

As usual, the Hawks let big leads slip away. Good thing they were up by 28 and not 18. Two observations from last night’s game: 1- I see the “old” Jamal Crawford paid a visit with all the hot dogging and ball hogging which turned into 5 turnovers. Stop playing with house money. 2- It seemed that the idea in the 3rd was to slow down the pace and establish the post. I don’t understand why they don’t stick with what was working the whole first half. Keep pushing, step on their necks, and let your starters rest the 4th quarter.

Astro Joe

March 14th, 2010
12:58 pm

ReeRoe, I’ve been waiting for that logic to kick-in (can you play starters 34 minutes in regular season and expect them to perform well when playing 40-42 minutes in the playoffs?). I’ve never trained nor run a marathon before, but my guess is that you don’t train by running 20 miles and save yourself for the 26 miles. No, I don’t think starters should always play extended minutes, but if they do so 2 of every 3 games, I’m not against it either.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
1:15 pm

Josh is not a center but a power forward.

Our center, is Al Horford. When it comes to rebounds, (in which he currently ranks #15 among NBA centers), Id rather see him play the defense and let the forwards pick up the rebounds he would cause by playing defense. Id rather see him block and alter shots or put some one on the seat of their pants, rather than pick up a rebound from someone else’s defense. Currently our center, Al Horford is ranked # 18 among nba centers for Block shots. Over the past month he has hoover between #18 and #25. As long as we are soft in the 5 spot teams will continue to penetrate, pick and roll, isolate, and take their man of the dribble straight to the 5 position because we have no defense at that position.

Every championship caliber team has a center who can block or alter shots with his back to the rim and protecting the interior half circle underneath the basket. Thats not the power forward Job but the center’s. You cant take Horford’s responsibility as the center and lump him with Josh to lessen Al’s lack of defensive responsibility.

Quit Hiding behind Josh. Josh is one of the best power forwards in the game! period! He may be the best at the rate he is growing. He is not, nor ever was the center.

We can do better than a center who is number 18th among center for shot blocking and 15 for rebounds.

Josh isnt the problem.He does it all at his position. To get to the championship level we need a 5 who can do it all at his position.

NO BRAINER!

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
1:17 pm

Teague look very goods sitting on the bench because he is still a turnover waiting to happen! 5-9 minutes a game is more than adequate for him. Hes is about 3 years away from serious minutes. He still plays stupid.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
1:20 pm

What is ” specially stupid” is expecting a team with 1 legitimate allstar to get to the championship rounds…Talk about “special”, that is specially foolish.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
1:39 pm

Truth-serum,

Do you realize that every time you criticize Horford for lack of blocks that you are actually condemning Woody’s precious switching defense. Al is not allowed to park in the lane and defend the rim. He is very often switching off onto a guard 15-18 ft. from the basket.

Have you not noticed that EVERY TIME you mention his shotblocking that either Wabe, or O’Brien, or vava74, or cp, or someone else (not even me) calls you out and brings up the switching defense. Are you the ONLY one on the blog who fails to see this?

Or do you just hate Horford so much that it blinds you to the real reason he’s not nearer to the rim?

The HUGE (Woody’s word) irony is that every time you bring up Horford’s “lack” of blocks, you are indicting the very coach you CLAIM to be defending.

If you want more blocks from Horford, then you should be imploring Woody to keep him in the lane.

Jody

March 14th, 2010
1:43 pm

Obviously, the Hawks have to do a better job of limiting teams to one shot which, in other words, means they have to do a better job rebounding the basketball. However, you can’t simply ignore the effect a lack of size plays in the problem. If you’re going to play a 6′8 guy at power forward and a 6′9 1/2 guy at center, then you have to expect that you’ll have some rebounding issues.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
1:48 pm

Jody,

Agreed. For a while, after the All-Star game, we were rebounding great. But the last few games have been subpar.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
1:51 pm

Sautee, When you open your mouth how many flies come in?

NO center can park in the lane. Duh^3! Woody has to switch to compensate for Horford and Bibby.

I dont hate Horford, I think he is a 1st class power forward! Not as good as Josh, but certainly a starter on almost all teams.

No, I havent notice any one able to defend Horford’s inability to block short or his noddle arm defense.

If I want more block from the center position I hire a center, and then I wont have to rotate the 1 or the 5 spot on defense. You defense scheme is base on the ability of the players on the team not the effectiveness of the technical styles. You cant run and gun team with near retiring veteran and you cant play a post up zone defense with a power forward in the center spot, sautee.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
1:51 pm

*horfords inability to block shots

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
1:52 pm

If I want more blocks from the center position, I’d hire a center,

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
1:56 pm

And, by the way, Horford is NOT 15th in rebounding by centers.

He’s tied with Al Jefferson for 7th.

Do your research.

Here’s the link:

http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Rebounds.jsp?league=00&season=22009&conf=OVERALL&position=1&splitType=9&splitScope=GAME&qualified=Y&yearsExp=-1&splitDD=

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
2:01 pm

Truth-serum,

Maybe you haven’t noticed, but the trading deadline is over. We can’t just go out on the street and hire a center. We have to do what we can with who we have.

Once again, if you criticize Horford for not blocking enough shots, you are criticizing Woody.

You can not get around this. Because THIS is how Woody is choosing to use his personnel.

northcyde

March 14th, 2010
2:09 pm

For those who choose to answer this question, give Woody a letter grade on his coaching job this season:

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
2:19 pm

B-, but I’m seeing signs that he is growing as a coach. That’s encouraging, and somewhat unexpected. But maybe, like it takes some players a few years for the light to go on, it’s the same for coaches. Woody is extremely fortunate to have an owners group who stuck with him for long enough to grow. Now we’re seeing some of the fruit ripening.

I’m still concerned about the lack of in-game adjustments, and the lean rotations, but even that is slowly getting better. (He said hopefully.)

O'Brien

March 14th, 2010
2:26 pm

The Mavericks had won 13 ganes in a row, so I can only imagine how pleased their fans were with their play.

And then they lose by 34 to the Knicks in Dallas. I wonder what the fans are saying now?

JeJe

March 14th, 2010
3:11 pm

The reason people think Joe and Jamal have to have perfect games against Orlando/Cleveland in order for us to win is because Marvin cowers away and Bibby sucks. They do not step up when needed against GOOD teams and therefore we will not succeed in the playoffs. Would be nice if Marvin actually had a break-out year and did something for this team besides average defense and 10 ppg

JeJe

March 14th, 2010
3:17 pm

Woodson gets a C.

We have lost 10+ games we should’ve won that are solely his fault (guys being exhausted in the 4th, offense nonexistent [Cavs game, Warriors].

Lucky I didnt fail him

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
3:25 pm

Get you facts straight liar. You have 0 credibility!

PLAYER NAME, TEAM NAME GP MPG BLK PF BLKPG BLKP48M BLK/PF
1
Dwight Howard , ORL
67 34.9 184 236 2.75 3.78 .78
2
Andrew Bogut , MIL
58 32.6 145 186 2.5 3.68 .78
3
Brendan Haywood , DAL-WAS
62 32.0 129 171 2.08 3.12 .75
4
Samuel Dalembert , PHI
65 25.6 130 209 2.0 3.74 .62
5
Brook Lopez , NJN
66 37.0 120 215 1.82 2.36 .56
6
Kendrick Perkins , BOS
63 28.0 112 181 1.78 3.05 .62
7
Roy Hibbert , IND
65 24.3 110 229 1.69 3.34 .48
8
Emeka Okafor , NOH
66 29.5 110 184 1.67 2.71 .6
9
Marc Gasol , MEM
67 35.9 104 247 1.55 2.07 .42
10
Andrew Bynum , LAL
62 30.6 89 187 1.44 2.25 .48
11
Andrea Bargnani , TOR
62 34.8 88 176 1.42 1.96 .5
12
Jermaine O’Neal , MIA
61 29.1 84 189 1.38 2.27 .44
13
Joel Anthony , MIA
64 14.7 84 121 1.31 4.28 .69
14
Ben Wallace , DET
60 29.5 73 118 1.22 1.98 .62
15
Chris Kaman , LAC
61 35.1 71 169 1.16 1.59 .42
16
Mehmet Okur , UTA
59 29.3 68 178 1.15 1.89 .38
17
Al Jefferson , MIN
62 32.6 71 166 1.14 1.68 .43
18
Al Horford , ATL
65 35.1 72 185 1.11 1.51 .39
19
Spencer Hawes , SAC
64 26.5 65 176 1.02 1.84 .37
20
Marcin Gortat , ORL
66 13.2 62 111 .94 3.43 .56
20
Nene Hilario , DEN
66 33.6 62 232 .94 1.34 .27
22
Channing Frye , PHX
65 27.6 59 211 .91 1.58 .28
23
Drew Gooden , LAC-DAL
58 24.0 52 168 .9 1.79 .31
24
Nick Collison , OKC
57 21.2 38 173 .67 1.51 .22
25
Nenad Krstic , OKC
62 22.8 36 147 .58 1.22 .24
26
Ryan Hollins , MIN
58 18.4 33 169 .57 1.48 .2
27
* DeJuan Blair , SAS
64 18.5 33 177 .52 1.34 .19
28
Charles Hayes , HOU
64 21.0 31 164 .48 1.11 .19
29
David Lee , NYK
66 37.1 31 201 .47 .61 .15
30
Antonio McDyess , SAS
60 20.8 24 115 .4 .92 .21
31
Zaza Pachulia , ATL
61 13.5 24 147 .39 1.4 .16
32
* David Andersen , HOU
60 14.5 12 117 .2 .66 .1
33
Juwan Howard , POR
60 22.8 9 163 .15 .32 .06

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
3:31 pm

As for rebounds yea, after the weekend updates he moved up to #8 among centers for picking up the rebounds where some else has played the defense. He averages being between # 8 and # 15. Bottom line is this is still not acceptable. We need a defender not a garbage collector. If you have ever played basketball youd know this phrase.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
3:32 pm

Woodson, gets a A. Winning with only 1 legitimate allstar!

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
3:38 pm

Truth-serum,

Before getting on me about credibility, go back and read my earlier post. I said you were wrong about Al’s REBOUNDING numbers, and I gave the correct link to the chart.

The chart you just posted was for blocked shots, which at least you NOW admit that Al is 18th and not the 24th or 25th that you TRIED to say he was. I never said he was not 18th on the blocked shot list. So why are you posting it?

O'Brien

March 14th, 2010
3:39 pm

northcyde,

I give Woody a solid B for the season, but I think the potential is there for him to get a B+ (or maybe even A-).

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
3:42 pm

Truth-serum,

You said this: “You defense scheme is base on the ability of the players on the team not the effectiveness of the technical styles.”

So I’m glad that we agree that Woody’s switching defense causes Al to have fewer blocked shots. That’s Woody’s choice in how he uses his personnel on defense.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
3:48 pm

Let’s see, Joe Johnson was named by the coaches to the All-Star team.

Al Horford was named by the coaches to the All-Star team.

Hmmmm…. both All-Stars by the very same method. Sounds like we have TWO legitimate All-Stars to me. And another who is proving that he should have been named.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
3:52 pm

No, Switch is designed to help at weak spots like the 5 position and the 1position. Are you a right wing radical republican type who twist the truth to support sick ideology? What causes woody to rotate his defense through switching is an effort at preventing other teams from isolating him one on one under the basket where he is weak and frail, often getting push and man handled and thereby opening the lanes to the rack for many different attacks. Lets be clear. We wont go far with Al at center.

I MUS WRITE

March 14th, 2010
3:55 pm

OMG…..Officer friendly is at it again,people dont feed the animals-in this case the swine. Just becuz the man was handed a golden highliter doesnt mean he’s credible. Sarcastic huh?…..Uhhhm howz about catching sum bad guys and stop wasting our tax dollars.

REALLY?

March 14th, 2010
3:55 pm

One bonafied, jj and one by consolation hoe.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
4:04 pm

Truth-serum said this:

“Lets be clear. We wont go far with Al at center.”

Won’t go HOW far?

Aren’t you the one who keeps on talking over (and over and….) about how the “experts” picked us to be the 4th seed?

Where are we now? Seems like we’ve gone pretty far with an undersized power forward playing All-Star center.

So I guess you’d like to just call off the season because “we won’t go far with Al”?

And no, not a republican, but yes, an Obama supporter.

But, speaking of republicans, wasn’t it YOU who was spouting conspiracy theories about how the Coaches conspired against us by voting Al to the All-Star game?

How did it go again….. they wanted to convince us that Al was better than we thought so we wouldn’t pursue another center?

Well, it’s just as believable as Iraq having WMD’s right?

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
4:50 pm

Sybil:

Hey ! It’s more fun when you’re around. seriously.
I agree, we need a [5].
Al is a natural [4].
Josh would be a terrific [3]. Think – ‘Artest’.
‘BUT’, what are you gonna do? Play your best players. Right.
Well, except when Wdsn refuses to play Teague.
But, thay’s another discussion. Right.
See, we are on the same page.
Try and have an open mind.
You criticize right wing politics. Agreed.
So, have an open mind, like a true progressive.
Old time ‘Southern’ Democrat. Right.
Please, don’t talk so ugly.
You lose credibility.
You could build some up if you would not lower yourself. Right.
Really, I’m trying to help.
Enjoy the selection show.
If they leave out Miss. St. = ‘Travesty’. Right!

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
4:56 pm

The Grinch:

I never jumped on ‘Big Ray’.
I agree it appeared to be sarcasm.
Thanks.

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
5:29 pm

Zach:

Answer / ‘Shaq’ – What’s your point?
I never said I was any kind of god.
Just tons of experience.
Did you follow the whole topic between northcyde & myself.
By the way – I never criticized Josh. [Just in case]
I was, and will continue to criticize Wdsn.
It comes with the territory. [coach]
I also commended him in a later post.
Also, I’m confused, so please come back and tell me which
“statement” I made and in what context, that was so egregious.

Zach:
“Are you serious?!? Did you really just say this after saying you were a coach and a teacher and a basketball god in the last paragraph.”

Honestly, I’m perplexed.
I’m not above stupidity, just ask ‘Sybil’.
However, I would like to know what I said that rose to the occasion.
Also, I’m very uncomfortable using ‘god’, even small ‘g’ in any
context on a basketball blog. I don’t like to throw ‘His’ name
around loosely. [paraphrase]
Thanks AJ, I kinda borrowed that from you.

Joe Mama

March 14th, 2010
6:31 pm

Grandma and Saltee, At least we agree, Horford is not the answer @ the 5. Josh is and will always be a power forward and you cant change that in your preparation of moving in a true 5 and finding a place for Al.

When and if the Hawks get a center and still have Al and Josh on the roster. Al will split time between 4/5(just like he did in college) but he will be second on the depth chart at both positions. He is not as gifted as Josh is when playing the 4.

Yes, Al was @ one time recently at 23, 25 and now 18 on the block shots chart among centers. Thats stat get updated sometimes bi weekly. Right now he is 18th which is just awful! The same thing for rebounds. He as been rated as low as 15th and as high as 8th over the past two weeks. Keep in mind this is not among all player but just among centers. 15th and 8th is not the kind of numbers that is going to get you past the second round. Get real. Actually 8th best rebounding is equal to 9 rebounds a game. Not good.

Like I told you at the beginning of this season, Al is about as good as he will get. He may put up better numbers for the season than last year but it will be very marginal. Hes pretty much peaked.

Nacho

March 14th, 2010
6:39 pm

Really: You accuse others of what you do. Weak.

This is a basketball blog, not a forum to prove your political knowledge or ignorance.

Dezz Nuttz

March 14th, 2010
6:46 pm

Enter your comments here

Dezz Nuttz

March 14th, 2010
6:47 pm

Nacho, prove Dezz Nuttz…

Really?

March 14th, 2010
6:48 pm

Nacho when you finish with Dezz Nuttz, Extenze my Woody.

Hawk n the Ham

March 14th, 2010
6:57 pm

Michael Wilbon just said on TV, he sees the Hawks playing the Bucks in round 1 of the playoffs………..and the Bucks winning.

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
7:16 pm

TS:

I’m gonna play nice.
I appreciate that you didn’t talk ugly.
Now, I really think Josh & Al work well together.
Think of it like that.
Don’t just think positions.
I think Josh and Al enjoy playing together.
So, how can we best enhance their abilities.
Playing together and TEAMWORK [chemistry]
trumps individual stats (such as blocked shots, etc.)
when all else [talent/skill] is equal.
That was poorly stated but I hope you see my point.
Players such as: Rodman, Artest, Battier, et al,
sacrificed for the greater good.
Now doesn’t that feel better, even if you disagree?
Miss. St. got jobbed!

Najeh Davenpoop

March 14th, 2010
7:37 pm

Shawn Bradley averaged 2.5 blocks per game for his career.

Darko Milicic, for his career, averages 2.5 blocks per 35 minutes for his career.

On the other hand, Dennis Rodman, he of the 8 All-NBA Defensive Team appearances, averaged a whopping 0.6 blocks per game.

The point is, of course, that blocked shots is a very unreliable measure of defensive effectiveness.

Seriously, I can’t believe this conversation continues on this blog.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
7:45 pm

Truth-serum,

Funny how your COY Woodson doesn’t agree with you regarding Al Horford.

Here’s what Woody said before this season:

“I remember last year after Al got hurt those two times … We were exposed. Al’s the one guy I feared going down.”

The ONE guy he feared going down. Not Joe Johnson, not Josh Smith.

Al Horford (Woody’s All-Star Center)

And remember…. when you criticize Horford’s shotblocking, you are really criticizing Woodson’s defensive scheme.

You don’t really want to criticize Woody, do ya?

JeJe

March 14th, 2010
7:46 pm

he reason people think Joe and Jamal have to have perfect games against Orlando/Cleveland in order for us to win is because Marvin cowers away and Bibby sucks. They do not step up when needed against GOOD teams and therefore we will not succeed in the playoffs. Would be nice if Marvin actually had a break-out year and did something for this team besides average defense and 10 ppg.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
7:54 pm

Truth-serum,

You said this:

“Actually 8th best rebounding is equal to 9 rebounds a game. Not good.”

Once again, false information. Horford is tied for 7th among centers with Al Jefferson at 9.4 rebounds per game.

Once again, here’s the link: http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Rebounds.jsp?league=00&season=22009&conf=OVERALL&position=1&splitType=9&splitScope=GAME&qualified=Y&years

Down at 9.0 rebounds (12th) is 7′ 0″, 265 lb. Brook Lopez.

What did you say…. not good?

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
8:01 pm

ND:

Exactly!
I was afraid no one would see my point.
Thanks.

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:10 pm

You are right. Here is today’s NBA.com listing for centers. Hes not 8th, hes 15th, yes, its not 9 rbs, its 9.4. sorry about the .4 idiot.

March,14 2010
2009-10 REBOUNDING LEADERS : Rebounds Per Game
Displaying results 1-50 of 189 found – Centers
Results: 1-50 51-100 101-150 151-189 Next »

PLAYER NAME,TEAM NAME GP MPG OFF ORPG DEF DRPG REB RPG RP40
1
Dwight Howard , ORL
67 34.9 232 3.5 651 9.7 883 13.2 18.1
2
Zach Randolph , MEM
66 37.9 273 4.1 506 7.7 779 11.8 14.9
3
David Lee , NYK
66 37.1 178 2.7 593 9.0 771 11.7 15.1
4
Marcus Camby , POR-LAC
61 30.8 201 3.3 502 8.2 703 11.5 18.0
5
Carlos Boozer , UTA
62 35.1 143 2.3 556 9.0 699 11.3 15.4
6
Chris Bosh , TOR
57 36.3 169 3.0 471 8.3 640 11.2 14.9
7
Gerald Wallace , CHA
62 41.7 127 2.0 520 8.4 647 10.4 12.0
8
Tim Duncan , SAS
61 31.8 192 3.1 444 7.3 636 10.4 15.7
9
Andrew Bogut , MIL
58 32.6 178 3.1 426 7.3 604 10.4 15.3
10
Brendan Haywood , DAL-WAS
62 32.0 242 3.9 376 6.1 618 10.0 14.9
11
Lamar Odom , LAL
66 30.8 143 2.2 491 7.4 634 9.6 15.0
12
Samuel Dalembert , PHI
65 25.6 190 2.9 431 6.6 621 9.6 17.9
13
Marc Gasol , MEM
67 35.9 205 3.1 429 6.4 634 9.5 12.6
14
Al Jefferson , MIN
62 32.6 153 2.5 429 6.9 582 9.4 13.8
15
Al Horford , ATL
65 35.1 183 2.8 426 6.6 609 9.4 12.8
16
Chris Kaman , LAC
61 35.1 149 2.4 414 6.8 563 9.2 12.6

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:14 pm

one other thing idiot, when you ask NBA.com for statistics be sure to say “C” for centers and “all” for all centers.

here is the correct link eggfaced.

http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Rebounds.jsp?league=00&season=22009&conf=OVERALL&position=0&splitType=9&splitScope=GAME&qualified=Y&yearsExp=-1&splitDD=

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
8:15 pm

Truth-serum,

You also said this regarding Horford’s rebounding standings among centers:

“15th and 8th is not the kind of numbers that is going to get you past the second round. Get real.”

Oh REALLY?

How about this: In 07-08 the Celtics won the Championship.

Their “true” center, Kendrick Perkins was 14th among centers in blocked shots, and 21st in rebounding.

TWENTY-FIRST and his team won the Finals.

What were you saying about the second round?

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:17 pm

Dennis Rodman wasnt a center so how in the hell is that relevant? Where do they get these people from?

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:18 pm

15th and 15th rebound and block wont get you out of the kitchen let alone the second round.

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:19 pm

Hes not the 8th rebounding center, theyve given that to tim duncan, I was right the first time, the bum is 15th. Click the link and see for yourself butt face.

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:20 pm

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:23 pm

before I answer you most recent idiocy apologize for your lying and posting erroneous links about the centers stats in rbs and blks. Otherwise, unlike you, I dont enjoy pissing in the wind!

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
8:24 pm

Oh boy, am I ever egg-faced. LOL, dude, look at the chart you just printed. It’s for ALL players, not centers. Unless of course Gerald Wallace, Z-bo, Boozer, TD, and Lamar Odum have changed position overnight.

maybe you want to retract that?

Yeah, boy, I’m egg-faced alright. heh, heh.

drmaryb

March 14th, 2010
8:49 pm

Bill Parcels…
Said it Best, “I didn’t buy the Groceries!”

It is not Woody’s fault that B-Knight didn’t draft a Point Gaurd – Billy passed on Chris Paul & Deron Williams.

Woody has to cook what’s in the fridge! So, if you don’t like Bibby? Then call Billy – he’s at home pruning his trees for the wife! & If JT0 was such a phenom then why was he sitting there at the 19th pick? Or whatever pick he was.

Get a point people. If we played JT0 heavy minutes this year we would not be the #3 seed. How do I know, because we are the #3 seed!

Geez!

Ree Roe

March 14th, 2010
8:55 pm

ORL just lost. We got NJ on Tues…when we win that we’ll be 3 games back goin into Wed night’s action

-REEalize it’s Roe!!!

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:57 pm

AT the end of the night, hes still number 15, have a good night. Shout when you have something to say.

Eggfaced saltee

March 14th, 2010
8:59 pm

Id did not write chart, NBA.com did and its overall & Position (C).

drmaryb

March 14th, 2010
9:08 pm

Charlotte beats Orlando
Cavaliers beat Celtics

How did Charlotte beat Orlando, well they went right at “The Beast” & got him in foul trouble. (He’s foul proned). That is the answer to beating the magic! If we can go right at Dwight & take him out, we got a chance to troll in the paint!

Let’s Go! Hawks!

RaJaH

March 14th, 2010
9:09 pm

“It is not Woody’s fault that B-Knight didn’t draft a Point Gaurd – Billy passed on Chris Paul & Deron Williams.”

Woody didn’t want Paul or Williams anymore than Knight did and even went on record saying so.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
9:17 pm

Truth-serum,

At the end of the night, he’s #15 overall, and tied for #7 among centers. If you follow the very link that YOU provided above at 8:20, you see this:

Rebounds Leaders > 2009-2010 > Regular Season > All Positions > All Players > Per Game > All Conferences > Qualified Only

Note that it says (and this is from YOUR link) ALL positions

You’d need to go to the box that says “player options” and click on C (for centers)

Then you will see that I was correct. Tied for #7 in rebounds among centers.

And yet, you accuse me of lying and posting erroneous links.

Ironic, isn’t it?

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
9:26 pm

TS – Be nice.
C’mon now, I’m tryin’ to keep you in the game.

Grandad

March 14th, 2010
9:34 pm

Sautee – I enjoy banging my head against the wall as much as the next guy. But doggone, after a while, you end up with a headache and the wall
ain’t even got a dent. Bless his heart. That’s one ‘thick’ wall.

Sautee

March 14th, 2010
9:50 pm

Grandad,

So aptly put.

And yes, it’s probably futile, but I’d just like to get him to be real. He can rail against Horford all he wants, but don’t try to fudge the numbers.

Dat ain’t riiight. Last year he repeatedly posted Horford’s playoff numbers as his regular season numbers. Argued over and over that he was certain. But of course he was proven wrong then too.

I’ll have to say that the conspiracy theory is quite a stretch, though. Hey, at least it showed some imagination. (There some positive spin for you).

Have a good evening, I’m off.

JeJe

March 14th, 2010
10:41 pm

The reason people think Joe and Jamal have to have perfect games against Orlando/Cleveland in order for us to win is because Marvin cowers away and Bibby sucks. They do not step up when needed against GOOD teams and therefore we will not succeed in the playoffs. Would be nice if Marvin actually had a break-out year and did something for this team besides average defense and 10 ppg…

Big Ray

March 14th, 2010
10:53 pm

Grandad ,

Sorry to make things such a mystery. Yes, I was being humorous (sarcastic), and I’ve always enjoyed your posts.

Northcyde ,

Actually, I believe some of what I said (Woody IS a good coach, and players are responsible for their own work ethics) , as well as some of what you say. I don’t believe in telling people how to think or feel, or telling them that how they think or feel is somehow wrong or inaccurate simply because I don’t feel or think the exact same way. But that’s just my take on things. Your take is clearly different. Different strokes and all that….

Hope life is going well for you, Kirk. And I hope your roommate got a new laptop and quits stealing yours.

Truth Serum ,

I still don’t get why Horford has to be blamed for being the best big man on the team. Horford didn’t draft anybody, has no power over free agency or trade, can’t sign anyone to a contract. He’s a better center than anyone we’ve had on this roster in years, and he’s only doing the job he’s being asked to do. One day he may not have to play center for the Hawks. When that day comes, I hope whoever is playing center can do a better job than he does. Which means they have to make the all-star team or average more than 14 points and 9.5 rebounds per game.

Until then, why blame the man who got forced into the job?

Big Ray

March 14th, 2010
10:55 pm

Man, one of these days I’ll actually remember to LOG OUT of WordPress after checking up on my blog, and BEFORE hanging out with everybody else on these here blogs….

Big Ray

March 14th, 2010
11:02 pm

Sam’l ,

No harm, no foul. You were misdirected. I’ve enjoyed reading your posts here and on the fan blog. You should come around more often.

JeJe ,

It’s easy to pick on Marvin, but if he’s going to have a breakout year, one of two things has to happen. Either the team will suddenly average about 110 ppg, or somebody else’s shot attempts get cut. Take your pick between JJ, Smith, Horford, and Crawford. Seriously, those are your top four scorers/shot takers. They average 21 ppg, 16ppg, 14ppg, and 17ppg, roughly. Marvin averages 10ppg, so between those 5 guys, you have roughly 78 ppg. We haven’t counted Bibby or any of the other guys on the bench.

Having said that, I would like for Marvin to score more. I’d like to see him get about 15ppg. But what would you consider a breakout year? 20ppg? 18ppg? For that to happen, he either has to be taking somebody else’s shots, or this team has to come up with a system that scores more points. I’m not disagreeing with you, just trying to put it into perspective.

As for Bibby, he’s on the way down, man. Dude can hit some shots, but he’s becoming inconsistent.

Just Saying

March 14th, 2010
11:45 pm

Not a CAVS fan at all but do like how their team has fun (and win). Would it be so bad to wear the old school Spud Webb era jersey at home games now and then?

Big Ray

March 14th, 2010
11:54 pm

Sure. Why not.

northcyde

March 15th, 2010
12:30 am

@ Big Ray:

Whoever this Kirk cat is, he must’ve really done a number on you and some of the other people around here. But Kirk is not me. “Me” is northcyde. I also post on Hawksquawk, and have been a member there since 2005. I was also the former mod on the ESPN Hawks board back in 2006 – 2007.

No need to change my name, or come up with fake names, or any of that.

Hawks have won 8 out of 11 . . and 21 of their last 32 games.

Big Ray

March 15th, 2010
12:48 am

Northcyde ,

Sorry, mistaken identity I suppose, this being a computer forum and all that. Nope, dude didn’t “do a number on me”, you just sound EXACTLY like him. I won’t go into detail, but it was entertaining (as are you). Yes, I know you post on Hawksquawk. Other people know that, too, knew it before I did. Must have been fun moderating the ESPN Hawks boards. I’ll have to settle for the obscurity of moderating the AJC Hawks fan forum.

No need to change my name, or come up with fake names, or any of that.

Your mom named you northcyde? Just kidding….

I love the Hawks. Have for a very long time…

The broad paint brush

March 15th, 2010
4:21 am

True, Horford is only doing what he is told by the people that hired him and manage him, being a @#15 in rebounding for centers and @# 15 for shot blocking among center does not make for an effective defender at the 5. My pointing this out is comment to those who placed him there and not as much to horford, who has reached his peak.

We we do get a center, hopefully JJ and Woodson will still be in the flock and not casualties of the fact that we have taken so long to seriously pursue one. Hopefully we will still have this nucleus intact.

So that is why I have and will continue to sound off on this point. Its nothing personal. I would love to see Horford here as a back up to josh and the new center. He would still get starter like minutes. But the reality is Josh is a better power forward than AL.

The broad paint brush

March 15th, 2010
4:23 am

The broad paint brush

March 15th, 2010
4:26 am

Its a defender that we need not someone to pick up garbage rebound while someone else plays the defense.

“Actually, I believe some of what I said (Woody IS a good coach, and players are responsible for their own work ethics”

We agree on something.

How about going after.....

March 15th, 2010
4:48 am

we could have had....

March 15th, 2010
4:50 am

o.O-Mac-Town -Macon, Georgia- Westsider-O.o

March 15th, 2010
7:03 am

After this next game at NJ, we get to see what we’re really made of.

@TOR, CHA, SA, @MIL, ORL, @PHI

Because of how we’ve played recently, I can only expect us to come out of that 3-3 at best. However, knowing the Hawks and after sucking against crappy teams, they might come out and go like 4-2 against much better comp.

Regardless how Ws and Ls play out during that 6 game stretch, I’m going to be looking to see if we can play smarter and hopefully with more chemistry.

I think it’s a joke that after all of this time, Woodson cant get these guys to look at least DECENT in the half-court set. maaayne thats some BS.

Nacho

March 15th, 2010
7:44 am

Brandon Heyward would be a nice addition for the front court rotation next year.

We also need to more quickly transition to a Teague run team than a Bibby run team.

We could also use a coach that would need at least two fingers in order to signal which play to run.

Astro Joe

March 15th, 2010
8:17 am

Sautee, maybe TS is just trying to help Horford become an A+ center. :twisted:

sam'l

March 15th, 2010
9:00 am

One day after calling out “Big Ray” for hypocrisy, I’m back. Checked the other blog…they’re wondering if the Hawks can beat New Jersey……..should be called the “Kindergarten Fans Blog”

Meanwhile, here in the real world, Orlando got beat by Charlotte, who the Orlando media is calling an “alarming” team based on Steve Jackson’s ability and coach Brown’s emphasis on defense. O. was missing Barnes, C. was missing Henderson. O. Coach blames lack of defensive intensity…O was playing back to back. Four potential coach of year’s were mentioned in adjacent piece, none of them Woodson, by the way….No sane person would.include Woodson at this point (except maybe Jason Kidd)..

The Hawks should have their media team (if they have one) tape the Charlotte-Orlando game and present this and acccompanying interviews, articles and analysis to coach Woodson and a specially implemented analysis TEAM including past and former coaches, D. Wilkins, M. Price, R. Sund, the entire coaching staff and “friends” accumulated through the years, and then immediately play and replay this tape and analyais for Woodson and the players to figure out a way to beat Orlando. It appears the two clubs will meet headon in the second round of the playoffs.
Then, the team should devote 10 minutes of time each practice working on this and try out some of this strategy next time they play Orlando.

Please note that this key to advancing did not take a full page of meaningless statistics accompanied by brainless schmoozing.

If you know a Hawk or have access to management, feel free to suggest this.

“My work here is over.” Owen Wilson, “You, Me, and Dupree” .

terrell

March 15th, 2010
9:27 am

Mary B, it is Woody’s fault he didn’t draft a pg. Wtf! He’s NEVER liked young pg’s. He didn’t want Paul or Williams. Hell, he didnt want Acie Law, but BK took him anyway just to piss him off. They weren’t the best of friends that year.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
9:45 am

AJ,

If that’s all it would take, sure, that’s ok.

Although HE’D be non-plussed at the idea. ;-)

Ken Strickland

March 15th, 2010
9:46 am

DRMARYB-I’ve been saying that for sometime now, but how can we attack Howard when Woodson insists on starting and playing Bibby most of the PG mins? He can’t beat anyone off the dribble, let alone challenge Howard even if he does manage to get into the lane. MBarnes and DHoward are the only Orlando starters who play any DEF. When teams penetrate, he usually gets into foul trouble trying to cover for his teammates poor DEF, much like we end up doing with Bibby in the gm.

The Spurs have done pretty good winning NBA titles over the past few yrs without a dominant C, unless you consider Nazi Muhammad or Nesterovich dominant centers. In fact, they now have a dominant player named Tim Duncan playing C, and they’re struggling to make the playoffs.

What made these teams click without a dominant center is the presence of a dominant PG, like TParker and CBillups. Last yrs Lakers were the 1st team to win a championship without a dominant PG since the MJ, SPippen led Bulls. Yes TRUTH SERUM, you’re correct, AHorford isn’t a dominant center and the Hawks will never win an NBA title with him at center, AS LONG AS MIKE WOODSON IS THE HC, AND AS LONG AS HE INSISTS ON STARTING AND GIVING HEAVY MINS TO PG MBIBBY, THE SLOWEST, LEAST ATHLETIC AND MOST OFF AND DEF LIMITED PG IN THE ENTIRE NBA.

Najeh Davenpoop

March 15th, 2010
9:57 am

“horford, who has reached his peak.”

Sounds a lot like the people who wanted to trade Josh last offseason. I could swear I heard people saying that about Josh too.

Big Ray

March 15th, 2010
11:01 am

Sam’l ,

I take it you missed my return post to you at 11:02 pm last night. Don’t know how you missed all the pure, unadulterated sarcasm in my post to Grandad, but hey…whichever…

By the way, I’m not sure where you read the idea that people are wondering if the Hawks can beat New Jersey, but it wasn’t on the Hawks Fan Nest. My post clearly illustrated how badly the Hawks have beaten New Jersey, and the question was whether or not the Nets could even be competitive.

Also, most of the posts are about who to pick up in the upcoming draft, and who we might get matched up with in the playoffs. Not sure what your issue with me is…you got a warm reception the few times you stopped by on the fan blog.

One more thing. Those “kindergarten fans” you mention all post here as well. And you call me a hypocrite? :lol: :lol: Whatever floats the raft, bro’….

Big Ray

March 15th, 2010
11:04 am

Najeh ,

Yep. All season long, as a matter of fact. It was tough being a Josh Smith fan…

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
12:01 pm

I never said this, someone is using my name to help there sick opinion. I would never move Josh to small forward because he is one of the best power forwards in the NBA and considerably better than Al. I would use Al off the bench as a backup 4/5

“Truth Serum

March 15th, 2010
8:29 am

Get a real center. Move Horford to pf. Move Josh to sf. Get rid of Marvin. Championship.”

Its a sad day when your argument is so said you need to use my name to help your sickness. Al backs up Josh and the center. Josh stays put!

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
12:21 pm

Still using Josh’s success to cover for Al’s lack thereof? Josh is still growing and growing. Al has peaked. Josh stand on his own merit.

Al, stand on your own merit or the lack there of…. You aint no Josh!

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
12:34 pm

Truth-serum,

About this: “Al has peaked.”

So if he has peaked, what explains this:

Since the All-Star game Al is tied for 4th in scoring among centers at 16.9 /gm

Here’s the link: http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Scoring.jsp?league=00&season=22009&conf=OVERALL&position=1&splitType=19&splitScope=GAME&qualified=Y&yearsExp=-1&splitDD=Post%20AllStar

His season average is 14.1 points. If he has peaked, why the uptick in his scoring?

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
12:39 pm

“All season long, as a matter of fact. It was tough being a Josh Smith fan…”

Not for Me!

Josh arrive here from high school. 99.9% of players who come straight from high school to the pros become super stars. I knew that Josh was one of the youngest players In the NBA and would have a tremendous upside if he could be with a father figure (woodson) who would guide and discipline that super talent.

Al came here as the most NBA ready player in the draft. There has only been small organic growth with him and looking at his lack of talent, I cant see where he will change much. Al is older and more experienced through college than Josh.

Al has peaked.#15th rebounder among centers and #18 for block shots Among centers. When you mention that he is 13ppg and 9rbs ppg it reminds me of a jelly filled doughnut.Looks good on the outside but full of jelly on the inside. (not that 13 and 9 excite me)

GET THE HAWKS A CENTER!

Ken, you are wrong about the lakers lack of a physical presence in the post, however I will agree with you on two point:

1)Yes TRUTH SERUM, you’re correct, AHorford isn’t a dominant center and the Hawks will never win an NBA title with him at center,

2) Bibby’s role should be reduced….as soon as the hawk acquire a 1 guard to take his place, but “turnover teague”, the 7th point guard in the draft aint the answer.

I think the powers that be have wrote of this season and are content to just make it to the second round win a game and exit. There will be causalities, however, because Joe wants a ring and Woodson, will be easily market,(and worth every penny). We will get nothing worthwhile in return for either. Once JJ is gone, Its all on Josh’s shoulders. We can and will have to rebuild around him, but I am sure it will be awhile before we are 52-3 wins again! If ever.

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
12:47 pm

Sautee Its not about a 2week hot streak, its about a season long effort. I appreciate you trying to put a positive spend on a lackluster campaign. The MAJOR point I think you are in DENIAL about is the fact that Al is among the weakest defenders in the pro game when playing the 5. Its about DEFENSE. READ MY LIPS: D-E-F-E-N-S-E-! – A WORD FOREIGN TO AL!

Al has been here what…4-5 years now, He hasnt grown into the great defender management hoped for. Hes peaked and he is ….what he is, a very good power forward, but not as good a power forward as Josh!

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
12:52 pm

And one other thing to the poster using my name at

March 15th, 2010
8:29 am

I like Marvin and what he does for this team. He is an asset as far as Im concerned and want to see him out there unselfishly blending in with our starting 5. Go MARVIN!

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
12:53 pm

*Woodson, will be easily marketed, (and worth every penny).

Astro Joe

March 15th, 2010
12:57 pm

TS… uh, Horford is about 2.67 years into his pro career. :oops:

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
1:01 pm

Truth-serum lies again:

He just said this: “Al has peaked.#15th rebounder among centers and #18 for block shots Among centers.”

While #18 in blocks is correct…….

Truth=serum KNOWS that #15 is OVERALL against all players, but he keeps on lying about it. He was clearly shown last night, that the link he keeps on posting is for ALL POSITIONS. If any of you doubt it, just go to the link Truth-serum provided at 8:20 last night. Click on that link, and this will come up:

Rebounds Leaders > 2009-2010 > Regular Season > All Positions > All Players > Per Game > All Conferences > Qualified Only

Notice that truth-serum’s link leads you to” All Positions” and NOT to Centers.

Horford, as of today, is tied with Al Jefferson at 7th among Centers in rebounding / game.

And here’s the link:
http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Rebounds.jsp?league=00&season=22009&conf=OVERALL&position=1&splitType=9&splitScope=GAME&qualified=Y&yearsExp=-1&splitDD=All%20Teams

Note that when my link is clicked you come up with this:

Rebounds Leaders > 2009-2010 > Regular Season > Center > All Players > Per Game > All Conferences > Qualified Only

Indicating that the filter is set to measure that stats of centers.

Truth-serum, you don’t need to lie to tell us you don’t like Horford. We get it without the lies.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
1:29 pm

Truth-serum said this:

“Sautee Its not about a 2week hot streak, its about a season long effort.”

Ok, let’s look at his season: 14.1 points /gm

Last season he was at 11.5 points / gm

Let’s see that’s a 22.6% increase from last season. Is that a long enough view for you?

Tell me how 22.6% better than last year (and he’s still just 23 years old) means he’s “peaked”?

And anyone who thinks Horford has been around for 4-5 years certainly doesn’t pay much attention to the Hawks. LOL!

And by the way truth-serum, here’s something you said last June to Ken Strickland:

truth-serum

June 19th, 2009
10:51 am

Ken Strickland

June 18th, 2009
9:07 pm

“You apparently don’t understand what a center is because you keep referring to numbers whose relevance is minuet. The center post is not about rebounding. I wish you could understand and appreciate the center position better.”

OK, so if the center post is NOT about rebounding (your own words) than why are you trying to portray Horford as lacking in that department?

Which of course, isn’t true. He’s tied for 7th among centers in rebounding.

Astro Joe

March 15th, 2010
1:38 pm

BTW, Marvin averaged 14 points last season and 15 the previous season. Just saying.

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
1:47 pm

AJ if Marvin Average 12-15 points a game Im satisfied that he is in the flow but not the center piece. Im Satisfied. I dont need 20pts a night out of Marvin. I like the energy he brings.

Truth-Serum

March 15th, 2010
1:52 pm

Astro Joe

March 15th, 2010
12:57 pm

TS… uh, Horford is about 2.67 years into his pro career. :oops:

Thanks, I wasnt sure, he just seems so old.

Dezz Nuttz

March 15th, 2010
1:57 pm

You mean there are 7 better rebounding center and 17 better shot blocking defensive and in the NBA?

Does w h o r e ford play defense?

terrell

March 15th, 2010
1:57 pm

Marvin? Energy? Wow!

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
2:32 pm

“7 better rebounding center and 17 better shot blocking center?”

Just a little less than average Al huh?

Dude, I see what you mean about the dude takes a holiday on defense. I’m sure that’s Bibby’s fault.-LMAO

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
2:39 pm

While Josh is in the top 4 for all position in blocks shots, and a top 5 for rebounding forwards who arent also classified as centers, Al is finishing off a quarter pounder with cheese hoping to freeload a rebound after josh plays the defense…..

vava74

March 15th, 2010
2:39 pm

Darryl Dawkins! Come back! We need you as our enforcer!!! You and your 7rpg and 1bkpg career averages!!!!!!!!

Come back!!! Please!!!!

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
2:44 pm

True but he put more Id take chocolate thunder any day, you did not run over him and push him out of the paint like Al bytchford.

Darryl Dawkins – Mr. Chocolate Thunder

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
2:46 pm

Darryl Dawkins – Mr. Chocolate Thunder-more of a force and impact than the hamburgerler AL Hoe Ford

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeqKjXKGrFI

Nate ArchiBALL

March 15th, 2010
2:50 pm

What if Marvin made two more of the wide open jump shots he usually misses per game………. He wouldn’t need any additional shots.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
2:56 pm

Phoenix Suns Take Care of Undermanned New Orleans Hornets Behind 36 from Amare Stoudemire

Ken Strickland

March 15th, 2010
3:01 pm

SAUTEE-DAMN, YOU ARE THE MAN! If you must, keep hitting these SELFSERVING HATERS in the face with facts and their own self diluting BS. Isn’t it amazing how these clowns can’t even keep up with their own BS? Out of one side of his mouth, this fool claims THE CENTER POSITION ISN’T ABOUT REBOUNDING, and that ANYONE WHO KEEPS REFERRING TO NUMBERS WHOSE REVELANCE IS MINUET doesn’t know anything about the center position.

Now all of a sudden, he’s talking out of the other side of his crooked mouth, now that it suits his selfserving purpose, and making REBOUNDING and Horford’s NUMBERS REVELANT.

TRUTH SERUM-Please stop trying to promote your AHORFORD HATING BS by putting words in my mouth. I NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT ANYONE PLAYING CENTER FOR THE LAKERS. MY COMMENT WAS ABOUT THEM BEING THE ONLY TEAM TO WIN A NBA TITLE WITHOUT A DOMINANT PG(POINT GUARD) SINCE THE MJORDAN, SPIPPEN LED BULLS.

Since you’re so adamant about us needing someone other than AHorford at center, why don’t you give us the name of a center that’s currently doing a better overall job than Horford, and that we’d have a possible chance of acquiring? I would say you’re making a complete ASS of yourself by attacking Horford, but you already know that. You’re just reveling in the attention your rants against him are getting you.

We can drastically improve our speed, quickness, penetration, DEF and OFF tempo by giving JTeague Bibby’s mins, and/or bringing him off the bench. If any of you BIBBY LOVERS think playoff teams aren’t going to target Bibby and successfully create problems for us is just being downright stupid. There’s no way Bibby’s going to get quicker, faster, more athletic, better defensively or shoot more consistently, after failing in those areas and basically falling apart for most of the season.

Bibby’s overall regression and consistently poor play, along with Woodson’s stupidity and stubborn resistence to accepting the obvious about Bibby, will make it very likely we’ll end up with a 1st rd playoff elimination.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:01 pm

14.1
-11.5
———
2.6

I see what you mean, major growth.
And thats with Woody making an extra effort to get him the ball more this year than last.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
3:02 pm

AS I said last night, in 07-08 Boston won the title.

Their starting center, Kendrick Perkins averaged 6.1 rebounds / game which was 21st in the league among centers. (Horford was 8th at 9.7)

He also averaged 1.45 blocks / game which was 15th in the league among centers. (Horford was 21st at .94 / game)

15th in blocks, 21st in rebounding by their starting center and they won the title.

In 08-09 the Lakers won the title.

Their starting center Andrew Bynum averaged 8.0 rebounds / game which was 16th in rebounding among centers. (Horford was 9.3 which was 8th)

Bynum averaged 1.8 blocks / game which was 8th among centers. (Horford was 1.42 which was 16th)

8th in blocks, 16th in rebounding. And his team won the title.

So Horford is averaging MORE rebounds / game at this time than the last two centers who won a ring.

Just an inconvenient truth for some.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
3:15 pm

11.5 to 14.1 is a 22.6% increase. How big of an increase is that in the business world? If you could give your shareholders a 22.6% increase in profits, do you think they would complain?

Is 22.6% better over a single year considered ANYTHING OTHER than major growth?

More inconvenient truth.

northcyde

March 15th, 2010
3:18 pm

As for defense at the center position, the only thing I can see to remotely measure this, is by using 82games.com and their “Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production” stat. If you click on the link, you’ll see Horford’s 82games.com player profile. Scroll all the way to the bottom to see the Opponent 48 minute production.

http://www.82games.com/0910/09ATL11.HTM#bypos

I won’t pay attention to Al’s production at PF, seeing that he’s only played a little time at PF. So I’ll focus on center. At Center, the opponent is shooting 51.2% FG vs Al . . and has a PER of 16.5

So the only thing I can know to do, is to see how the other centers in the league fare in those same stats. I’m listing what the opponent does against that center from a production standpoint. This does not take into account the defensive rebounding prowess of that player, which you have to factor in, when assessing a player defensively at center.

I have to admit, I am kinda shocked by this. Very shocked, to be honest.

***********************

SORTED BY FG%

Okur: 48.8% FG . . . PER: 13.9 . . . PTS/48: 16.4
Howard: 48.9% FG . . . PER: 15.8 . . . PTS/48: 16.9
Hibbert: 49.2% FG . . . PER: 20.5 . . . PTS/48: 23.5
Perkins: 49.6% FG . . . PER: 16.3 . . . PTS/48: 18.8
Bogut: 49.7% FG . . . PER: 14.8 . . . PTS/48: 16.9

Hawes: 51.1% FG . . . PER: 17.9 . . . PTS/48: 18.4
Horford: 51.2% FG . . . PER: 16.5 . . . PTS/48: 16.2
Hayes: 51.3% FG . . . PER: 19.0 . . . PTS/48: 17.3
Duncan: 51.5% FG . . . PER: 17.5 . . . PTS/48: 17.9
Bynum: 51.7% FG . . . PER: 17.5 . . . PTS/48: 18.5

Ben Wallace: 52% FG . . . PER: 20.7 . . . PTS/48: 18.5
Heywood: 52.3% FG . . . PER: 18.3 . . PTS/48: 17.6
Dalembert: 52.6% FG . . . PER: 18.3 . . . PTS/48: 18.7
Nene: 52.8% FG . . .PER: 17.6 . . . PTS/48: 18.1
Brook Lopez: 52.9% FG . . . PER: 19.7 . . . PTS/48: 20.2

J. O’Neal: 53.4% FG . . . PER: 19.3 . . . PTS/48: 19.9
Marc Gasol: 55.2% FG . . . PER: 17.8 . . . PTS/48: 19.2
Kaman: 55.1% FG . . . PER: 20.1 . . . PTS/48: 20.0
Lee: 56.1% FG . . . PER: 22.1 . . . PTS/48: 21.4
Okafor: 57.8% FG . . . PER: 22.4 . . . PTS/48: 21.7

*********************

SORTED BY PER

Okur: 48.8% FG . . . PER: 13.9 . . . PTS/48: 16.4
Bogut: 49.7% FG . . . PER: 14.8 . . . PTS/48: 16.9
Howard: 48.9% FG . . . PER: 15.8 . . . PTS/48: 16.9
Perkins: 49.6% FG . . . PER: 16.3 . . . PTS/48: 18.8
Horford: 51.2% FG . . . PER: 16.5 . . . PTS/48: 16.2

Duncan: 51.5% FG . . . PER: 17.5 . . . PTS/48: 17.9
Bynum: 51.7% FG . . . PER: 17.5 . . . PTS/48: 18.5
Nene: 52.8% FG . . .PER: 17.6 . . . PTS/48: 18.1
Marc Gasol: 55.2% FG . . . PER: 17.8 . . . PTS/48: 19.2
Hawes: 51.1% FG . . . PER: 17.9 . . . PTS/48: 18.4

Heywood: 52.3% FG . . . PER: 18.3 . . PTS/48: 17.6
Dalembert: 52.6% FG . . . PER: 18.3 . . . PTS/48: 18.7
Hayes: 51.3% FG . . . PER: 19.0 . . . PTS/48: 17.3
J. O’Neal: 53.4% FG . . . PER: 19.3 . . . PTS/48: 19.9
Brook Lopez: 52.9% FG . . . PER: 19.7 . . . PTS/48: 20.2

Kaman: 55.1% FG . . . PER: 20.1 . . . PTS/48: 20.0
Hibbert: 49.2% FG . . . PER: 20.5 . . . PTS/48: 23.5
Ben Wallace: 52% FG . . . PER: 20.7 . . . PTS/48: 18.5
Lee: 56.1% FG . . . PER: 22.1 . . . PTS/48: 21.4
Okafor: 57.8% FG . . . PER: 22.4 . . . PTS/48: 21.7

*********************

SORTED BY PTS/48

Horford: 51.2% FG . . . PER: 16.5 . . . PTS/48: 16.2
Okur: 48.8% FG . . . PER: 13.9 . . . PTS/48: 16.4
Howard: 48.9% FG . . . PER: 15.8 . . . PTS/48: 16.9
Bogut: 49.7% FG . . . PER: 14.8 . . . PTS/48: 16.9
Hayes: 51.3% FG . . . PER: 19.0 . . . PTS/48: 17.3

Heywood: 52.3% FG . . . PER: 18.3 . . PTS/48: 17.6
Duncan: 51.5% FG . . . PER: 17.5 . . . PTS/48: 17.9
Nene: 52.8% FG . . .PER: 17.6 . . . PTS/48: 18.1
Hawes: 51.1% FG . . . PER: 17.9 . . . PTS/48: 18.4
Bynum: 51.7% FG . . . PER: 17.5 . . . PTS/48: 18.5

Ben Wallace: 52% FG . . . PER: 20.7 . . . PTS/48: 18.5
Dalembert: 52.6% FG . . . PER: 18.3 . . . PTS/48: 18.7
Perkins: 49.6% FG . . . PER: 16.3 . . . PTS/48: 18.8
Marc Gasol: 55.2% FG . . . PER: 17.8 . . . PTS/48: 19.2
J. O’Neal: 53.4% FG . . . PER: 19.3 . . . PTS/48: 19.9

Kaman: 55.1% FG . . . PER: 20.1 . . . PTS/48: 20.0
Brook Lopez: 52.9% FG . . . PER: 19.7 . . . PTS/48: 20.2
Lee: 56.1% FG . . . PER: 22.1 . . . PTS/48: 21.4
Okafor: 57.8% FG . . . PER: 22.4 . . . PTS/48: 21.7
Hibbert: 49.2% FG . . . PER: 20.5 . . . PTS/48: 23.5

***********************

Totally shocked.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:22 pm

lakers – quit lying Saltee
Both played center
Gasol average 1.7 blks
Bynum average 1.4 blks

both played center
Perkins blks 1.97 2008/2009
garnett 1.19

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:23 pm

Why is it we keep producing offensive number when the issue is defense? yes, he is an average offensive player.

But he is a bottom feeder defensively….DUH!

northcyde

March 15th, 2010
3:27 pm

I don’t know what’s more shocking. Horford being statistically a top 5 defensive center this year . . . or ANDREW BOGUT being statistically a top 3 defensive center this year. And Bogut is basically doing that without a good PF at his side.

Also . . according to this, Mehmet Okur may be THE BEST on the ball defensive center this year. Howard is better defensively overall, because he blocks shots and rebounds at a much higher rate. But if you need a stop in general, Okur may be the guy to give it to you.

northcyde

March 15th, 2010
3:28 pm

Joe Mama . . . everything I posted in the previous thread . .. is what the opposing center does against that center. Those are defensive statistics I posted . . . not offensive.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
3:31 pm

So northcyde, are you saying that these stats show that Al gives up the fewest points to his man per 48 minutes in the LEAGUE?

Yes, that’s shocking, if that’s what those stats show.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:34 pm

I’m listing what the opponent does against that center from a production standpoint.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:39 pm

So northcyde, are you saying that these stats show that Al gives up the fewest points to his man per 48 minutes in the LEAGUE?

Yes, that’s shocking, if that’s what those stats show.

” I’m listing what the opponent does against that center from a production standpoint.”

WHAT IS SHOCKING IS HOW YOU AND KEN MISCONSTRUE STATS! SAUTEE.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
3:49 pm

Somebody needs a statistics primer.

If the best in the league at defending opposing centers is giving up 48.8% and Al is 7th at 51.2% then he’s only 2.4% behind the very best. And as we’ve been told 2.4% isn’t very much. Heck, some people think 22.6% isn’t very much. ;-)

Look at all the “true centers” on that list that are defending THEIR man WORSE than Al.

Thanks northcyde for some good perspective. And I’m as shocked a you. I thought Horford was a good man-on-man defender, but I was unaware that he was among the league leaders.

But this shows him in the top 5 overall. No wonder he made the All-Star team.

northcyde

March 15th, 2010
3:52 pm

Sautee . . . Yeah . . that’s what it’s showing. I mean, when you see the guys who are at or near the top of each of those lists like Howard, Duncan and Perkins, you have to take some stock into what this shows.

@ Joe Mama . . . I purposely looked at this from 3 different perspectives. If you look at a guy like Roy Hibbert, he’s actually a good defensive center from a FG% perspective. But when you start looking at PER and PTS/48, he ranks near the bottom. That’s partially because opposing centers know that they can go right at Hibbert, and he’s lazy when guarding jumpshooting centers. So while the defensive FG% is good for Hibbert, he gives up way too much production from opposing centers going right at him.

To penalize Horford for not stopping opposing PGs from blowing by Bibby, Crawford or JJ ( when he guards them ), doesn’t reduce Horford’s defensive prowess, when playing people straight up.

Playing defense is much more than simply blocking shots. Same way with steals. Give me a guy who plays great position defense that will cause missed shots, than a guy who blocks a lot of shots, but can’t stop anybody when he’s matched up against a guy trying to score on him in the low post.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:52 pm

northcyde

March 15th, 2010
3:28 pm

Joe Mama . . . everything I posted in the previous thread . .. is what the opposing center does against that center. Those are defensive statistics I posted . . . not offensive.

Yes, I wasnt referring to you. I applauded your post, how ever, as I said this only covers center to center scoring and no way is 52% a number to brag about and I agree, block are a very significant measurement as for the defensive strength of a center. Rebounds also play a part. When you total all up Horford is about AVERAGE in some ways and LESS THAN in other ways but in NO Way is he exceptional.

Bottom line among centers Al defensively is ……

8th in center Rebounds
18th in Block shots
51.2 % of the time his man will score when he shoots over all
The other power forwards and small forward and guards dunk on all too.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:56 pm

I understand your slant, but its the center job to protect the rim, not the guards or the power forwards. If we played man then that would be relevant but we cant because al’s man would dominate him.

I understand what you wanted to show emotionally, but the better centers are posting numbers that show their man scoring on them LESS than 50% of the time not more…..

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
3:58 pm

Hey truth-serum, what happened to Al being #15 in rebounds among centers. You said it a dozen times in the last 48 hours. Are you NOW admitting that you were wrong?

Northcyde JUST SHOWED that Al is a top 5 defensive center.

Sorry if that inconvenient truth doesn’t line up with your agenda.

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
3:59 pm

Got to go, its finals week for the quarter… here s my finale statements,

“I agree, block are a very significant measurement as for the defensive strength of a center. Rebounds also play a part. When you total all up Horford is about AVERAGE in some ways and LESS THAN in other ways but in NO Way is he exceptional.

Bottom line among centers Al defensively is ……

8th in center Rebounds
18th in Block shots
51.2 % of the time his man will score when he shoots over all
The other power forwards and small forward and guards dunk on all too.”

Enjoyed the conversation! have a good evening guys.

Astro Joe

March 15th, 2010
4:00 pm

Strickland, of course opposing teams will target Bibby. And likewise, we should be targeting the opposing team’s weak link, wherever it is. I’m not sure what validation you’re seeking… every team has a weak link and every other team attempts to exploit it. If Teague were starting with Horford, Smith, Marvin and Joe… who do you think opposing teams would target as our weak link in a playoff? And yes, team’s will also exploit someone who may be lacking in experience/knowledge (as well as physical limitations).

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
4:04 pm

Yes Sautee, I was wrong this week al is number 8 and has moved up from last week.

No Sautee, what Northcyde showed was all is easy to score on and when you consider he is 8th in rebounders, 18th for block shots and his own man scores on him 51.2% of the time when he attempts a shot.

If you want to call those numbers “good”,. Id say you and northcyde are on drugs. Have a nice evening.

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
4:05 pm

Truth-serum,

You said this: “If we played man then that would be relevant but we cant because al’s man would dominate him.”

First, do you think we AREN’T playing man defense?

Secondly, did you miss the point of northcyde’s stats? It showed Al in the top 5 of the league in playing his man. If Al’s man was dominating him, how would he be listed in the top 5?

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
4:05 pm

Astro Joe theres a 51.2% chance if you get the ball in the middle against all you can count the basket with a possible and 1, so Im going inside in the crunch!

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
4:08 pm

I understand what He intended sautee, I just think it back fired. This is what he proved to me:

Bottom line among centers Al defensively is ……

8th in center Rebounds
18th in Block shots
51.2 % of the time his man will score when he shoots over all
The other power forwards and small forward and guards dunk on all too.”

Joe Mama

March 15th, 2010
4:09 pm

and no, we play a switching defense.

Astro Joe

March 15th, 2010
4:13 pm

11.5 to 14.1 is a 22.6% increase. How big of an increase is that in the business world? If you could give your shareholders a 22.6% increase in profits, do you think they would complain?

Is 22.6% better over a single year considered ANYTHING OTHER than major growth?

More inconvenient truth.

Marvin’s second year went from 8.5 to 13.1 which is 54% growth. And from there, he averaged 14.5 over the next 2 seasons.

And since when is comparing Horford to Marvin considered a diss for Horford?

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
4:21 pm

AJ,

“Splain’ that to me again. I must have missed your point.

Was someone comparing Horford to Marvin?

Sautee

March 15th, 2010
4:35 pm

So Truth-serum,

You said this: “This is what he proved to me:

Bottom line among centers Al defensively is ……

8th in center Rebounds
18th in Block shots
51.2 % of the time his man will score when he shoots over all”

OK, that’s what the chart proved to you. I know it’s difficult to have someone give concrete evidence that Al is a better defender than you wish.

Did you also notice the “true centers” on the list that give up an even HIGHER % than Al?

Centers like:

Andrew Bynum 51.7%
Ben Wallace 52.%

Oh wait, he’s only 6′ 9″, sorry.

Brendan Heywood 52.3%
Sam Dalembert 52.6%
Nene 52.8%
B. Lopez 52.9%

Gee, one would THINK that those big bodies would hold their man to a lower % than itty bitty Al Horford. And just think, with our switching D, part of the time those centers are guarded by Bibby. You’d THINK that would affect the stats downward. Al must REALLY be doing well to offset that disadvantage.

The Truth

March 15th, 2010
6:38 pm

Here is a revealing chart I customized comparing Al Horford and 3 other top centers. Since I was only limited to a total of 4 centers in the comparison, I selected Dwight Howard, Andrew Bogart and Brandon Haywood along with Al Horford in the sample. What’s revealing is that this chart presents advance measurements that exposed player detail performance factors not previously discussed

If you look under the advance chart and find these categories:

ORtg = Offense Rating; An Estimate of points produced or scored per 100 possessions

DRtg = Defense Rating; An Estimate of points allowed per 100 possessions

OWS = Offense Win Shares; An Estimate of the number of wins contributed by a player due to his offense

DWS = Defense Win Shares; An Estimate of the number of win contributed by a player due to his defense

WS = Win Shares; An estimate of wins contributed by a player

Summary: A mixed bag for Al Horford. A case of the good, the bad and the ugly

ORTg – AL ranked 1 out of 4 (good) (other players not far apart, however)
DRtg – AL ranked 2 out of 4 (good) (however, only slightly better than last two)
OWS – AL ranked 4 out of 4 (bad) (A sizeable gap between Howard and AL)
DWS – AL ranked 4 out of 4 (awful) (A noticeable spread between Al and the rest)
WS – AL ranked 4 out of 4 (bad) (last in this group)

Ken Strickland

March 15th, 2010
7:29 pm

ASTRO JOE-It’s true, every team does have weaknesses, but no other team but us has the NBA’s slowest, least athletic and least productive starting PG. While Bibby isn’t the only PG that doesn’t play DEF, he’s probably the worst scoring and lowest assist generating starting PG in that group.

We either have to get a hell of a lot more OFF production, and/or a lot more DEF out our PG’s. Even dilusional BIBBY LOVERS know we’re never going to get anymore DEF out of Bibby, and we’re not likely to get much more OFF either, at least not on a consistent basis. Woodson is too loyal to Bibby, too stubbornly opposed to giving any rookie PG an honest chance to develop and produce, and too stupid to split their mins equitably and combine their talents to get the production we need at PG. STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES!

Big Ray

March 15th, 2010
11:52 pm

Heh….denial is stronger than any terms of logic, reason, or fact. You’d think that could be learned in college, but apparently not.

Joshua

March 22nd, 2010
12:53 am

Hello I am a big fan of the atlanta Hawks.

(no offense but I think the LA Lakers are better)

Joshua

March 22nd, 2010
12:55 am

I can imagine the hawks beating the kings,cavs,pistons,clippers,lakers,pacers,magic,spurs,wizards and the rockets 4 times in a row all of them.

Seriously the Lakers are 2nd in the compettion the cavs are 1st. GO HAWKS AND LAKERS.