
'Big Z' seeking buyout from Wizards. (NBA.com)
Phoenix– The Hawks didn’t make any trades at today’s deadline, no surprise since GM Rick Sund had said all along he wouldn’t break up the team’s core with a deal.
“We like our core guys,” Sund said today. “I think we are positioned pretty well. We will learn some more (about the team) going forward in the last month-and-a-half and the playoffs.”
The Hawks also were unable to find any trade proposals that made sense. However, sources said the Hawks have reversed their stance on keeping their roster at the league minimum of 13 and will consider signing veterans who are bought out of their contracts by the end of this month.
The Hawks are expected to be among the suitors for veteran center Zydrunas Ilgauskas if he receives a buyout from the Wizards, sources said today. Ilgauskas was traded from Cleveland to Washington on Tuesday in a three-team deal but he’s seeking a buyout of the prorated portion of his $11.5 million expiring contract. The Wizards are cutting salary as they look to rebuild and Ilgauskas’ agent, Herb Rudoy, said his client wants to play for a contender.
Among the Hawks’ Eastern Conference rivals, only Cleveland made a major trade. The Cavaliers got forward Antawn Jamison from Washington as part of the three-team trade involving Ilgauskas.
Otherwise, the trade deadline passed relatively quietly in the East.
The Magic stood pat. The Celtics reportedly were waiting on league approval to complete a trade with the Knicks for reserve guard Nate Robinson. The Bobcats could be tougher first-round opponents for one of the top East teams after they acquired Tyrus Thomas from Chicago and Theo Ratliff from San Antonio.
The Hawks, who continue a four-game road trip Friday night at Phoenix, are 34-18 and trail Orlando by 1.5 games in the Southeast Division. The Celtics were a half game behind the Hawks before playing at the Lakers late Thursday.
“Until the end of the season I don’t look at the win column, I look at the loss column,” Sund said. “Here the trade deadline has passed and, after Cleveland, you have three teams (Magic, Hawks and Celtics) with 18 losses jockeying for position.
“I think we are pointed in the right direction. As long as we stay healthy, and that’s an important key, we can compete for these playoff spots going down the stretch.”
Ilgauskas could help the Hawks in the playoffs. Rudoy said today he hadn’t spoken to the Wizards yet about a buyout. Ilgauskas, 34, is taking a few days to think about his future, and Rudoy said the Hawks would fit Ilgauskas’ criteria for a new team if he doesn’t re-sign with the Cavs.
“If he decides to leave Cleveland, once he gets the buyout–and we hope we will have several options–he will only go to a team that can win a championship, period,” Rudoy said. “He will not be on a team that has no chance. He wants to play for one of the top teams, and Atlanta certainly is one of those teams.”
Rudoy said “a lot of teams are very interested in” Ilgauskas but declined to name them. In addition to the Cavs and Hawks, the Dallas Mavericks and Denver Nuggets are also reported to be interested in Ilgauskas.
Under league rules the Cavaliers would have to wait 30 days after Ilgauskas is waived to re-sign him, while another team could sign him immediately. Ilgauskas would have to be waived by March 1 to be eligible for a playoff roster.
Sund, citing league tampering rules, declined to comment on Ilgauskas.
Ilgauskas, at 7 feet 3 and 260 pounds, would satisfy the Hawks’ desire for a beefy center in the post to deal with Eastern Conference rivals Orlando (Dwight Howard) and Cleveland (Shaquille O’Neal). Ilgauskas could backup Al Horford at center and the two also could play together in a lineup with Horford at power forward.
The Hawks’ other options at center are Zaza Pachulia, Jason Collins and Randolph Morris.
Ilgauskas, a 12-year NBA veteran from Lithuania, was averaging career lows of 20.5 minutes, 7.5 points, and 5.3 rebounds for the Cavs. He once was an offensive threat in the post but has become more of a jumpshooter late in his career. Ilgauskas has slipped to 38 percent shooting on jumpers this season, according to 82games.com.
MC
271 comments Add your comment
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
3:08 pm
Bring on Big Z and we could drop Cheeseburger Collins. However, the Hawks have no chance at Big Z and they know it, so why not make that statement.
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
3:10 pm
Being that the Rockets acquire Hill from the Knicks, maybe we can trade ZaZa for Yao Ming. Take that Astro, a bigger, younger injury all-star to help ticket sales…
Section 303
February 18th, 2010
3:11 pm
I would love it if Big Z was brought on. I am willing to pay higher season ticket prices to pay for him.
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
3:11 pm
Will yall stop fooling around on the other blog and join me on the new one… what? you can’t keep up with the multiple blogs?????
Paul
February 18th, 2010
3:13 pm
Even if we got this guy, Woodson would only use him for about 5mins a game.
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
3:14 pm
Perfect compliment to Josh and Al on offense: Big Z stands outside and can knock down the ‘3′. Al & Josh can still play in the middle where their talent best suits them. Now, can we make it happen?
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
3:15 pm
Ain’t no way the Big Z puppet will leave Cleveland if he was bought out in DC.
JerryWest
February 18th, 2010
3:15 pm
Ilgauskus fits like a glove to this front court. With the Cavs he is the 5th wheel.
tnt
February 18th, 2010
3:19 pm
Enter your comments here
tnt
February 18th, 2010
3:20 pm
yo if we get him we’ll have to big Z’s as backup C/PF, sick!!!
Ree Roe
February 18th, 2010
3:20 pm
Make this happen Sund. Joe Smith, Big Z, Al, ZaZa & Jason Collins would be an impressive frontline vs. anybody
-REEpeal it for Roe!!!!
tnt
February 18th, 2010
3:20 pm
two**
Matt the Brave
February 18th, 2010
3:25 pm
Would be nice, but he’s going back to Cleveland. Only way that we get him is by overpaying him.
Going after Ilgauskas would be right move for Hawks | Jeff Schultz
February 18th, 2010
3:28 pm
[...] According to our Michael Cunningham, the Washington Wizards, who acquired Ilgauskas from Cleveland Wednesday as part of the six-player, three-team trade with the Los Angeles Clippers, are likely to buy out the remainder of the 7-foot-3 center’s contract. That would allow Ilgauskas to sign as a free agent with any team, and at least four teams appear to be in the mix: Cleveland (which wants him back and would have to be considered the favorite), the Hawks, Dallas and Denver. [...]
dstdeelite
February 18th, 2010
3:29 pm
Wishful thinking! Why in the world would he come here? All he’s ever known is Cleveland. On paper, the Cavs chances of winning a title have dramatically increased with yesterday’s trade. Not to mention they still have this dude on the roster named LBJ. Ugh! I hate these school yard moves. First we get Mario West to fill a roster space and now we’re talking of adding Big Z. The last thing we need is someone slowing us down even further. Yeah we need size but jeez is this the answer?
O'Brien
February 18th, 2010
3:30 pm
Melvin,
I agree. I dont think Big Z is going anywhere except Cleveland. He’s been there forever, his family is there, and he knows they have a better chance to win a championship than the Hawks do.
However, if Sund is open to adding Big Z as our 14th player, then I hope he will be open to adding another veteran that might get bought out later on.
Cleveland will be tough to beat in the East though. And that will make it all the more fun if LeBron doesnt win a championship (or at the very least, get to the NBA finals) this year
Boston
February 18th, 2010
3:30 pm
@ Matt the Brave
Which we can. The Hawks have most of their MLE. Teams like Cleveland, Dallas and Denver don’t.
Mountain Man
February 18th, 2010
3:34 pm
How do ye pernounce thet feller’s name anyhow?
Mountain Man
February 18th, 2010
3:37 pm
Man, this is confusin’. So Washington trades fer tha feller. Then, they pay him a bunch of money to go back and play fer Clevelan’? Thet don’t make no sense.
A.S.
February 18th, 2010
3:37 pm
This is a big IF. The Hawks should have just made a deal prior to the deadline for a solid backup forward.
T.C
February 18th, 2010
3:37 pm
If we get big Z,then i would say the hawks can make it to the eastern conference finals.Thats if he’s used right because right now the way it stands,the magics,celtics with lil robinson added(he give the hawks fits everytime they play him),and definately not cleveland.Now lets see who miami gets.
Going after Ilgauskas would be right move for Hawks
February 18th, 2010
3:41 pm
[...] According to our Michael Cunningham, the Washington Wizards, who acquired Ilgauskas from Cleveland Wednesday as part of the six-player, three-team trade with the Los Angeles Clippers, are likely to buy out the remainder of the 7-foot-3 center’s contract. That would allow Ilgauskas to sign as a free agent with any team, and at least four teams appear to be in the mix: Cleveland (which wants him back and would have to be considered the favorite), the Hawks, Dallas and Denver. [...]
Stat Man
February 18th, 2010
3:42 pm
Seems like there should be a rule that a player traded away from a team can resign immediately with the team that just traded him.
That type of scenario could be awfully dangerous when used in devious ways (i.e. – before the trade, it’s already worked out that the player is being bought out & has already agreed to free agent terms with the previous team).
Oh well, with that numb nuts commissioner Stern in control, forget any common sense being applied.
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
3:47 pm
Michael:
What do ‘you’ think our chances are to acquire Z.I. and would Zaza be of any assistance in recruiting a fellow Eastern European?
GeeMack
February 18th, 2010
3:49 pm
Big Z will make no difference in how the Hawks fair against Cle or Orl. Wait….didn’t Big Z play last year when Orlando dusted the Cavs in the ECF? Dwight Howard is the same center that dusted Big Z, Verijo, & Joe Smith, and were taking about having 2/3rds of that combo in the Atl with out LBJ.
Oh yeah that really gives us a chance to beat Cle. & Orl!
The Hawks need one thing to be able to beat those 2 teams….play with some passion.
Wink
February 18th, 2010
3:49 pm
Z is going back to Cleveland. Hawks management knows this, just going thru the motions, to appease the masses. Z as a Hawks would only provide us another 3 point shooter, so he would not be in the paint to rebound. The is just about ready to retire & Cleveland is home and gives him the best chance to win a championship.
Gilley
February 18th, 2010
3:51 pm
The chances of us getting Z is very slim as I think he will return to Cleveland. But I hope he is mad about them trading him and comes to the Atl. I would love it.
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
3:53 pm
Wink:
Where an offensive player lines up has nothing to do with ‘defensive’ rebounding.
The Truth
February 18th, 2010
3:55 pm
Big Z coming to ATL? Sund is playing us like a horn
The Truth
February 18th, 2010
3:59 pm
Ladies and Gentlemen, introducing The NEW Hawks Playoff Killer
BigTimeTECHFan
February 18th, 2010
4:00 pm
Nope – don’t worry about big man, run 3 guards JJ, Bibby, Crawford with Smith and Al Hortford. This will cause matchup problems for everyone in the east now. Also teams can’t focus on JJ with Crawford in lineup.
Keep team the same, Once they pull there big man Al and Josh will eat them up. M. Williams less time and give JT-0 some playing time.
Freak them out, play fast. Hit J Smith on breaks
Mac-Town'z Finest 478
February 18th, 2010
4:05 pm
It looks like our boys Flip Murray and Acie Law are playing for the Bulls now in exchange for Tyrus Thomas to the Bobcats. I thought Flip was a key part of the Bobcats “success”…instant offense off the bench on a team that struggles to score…..
oh well..interesting
GeeMack
February 18th, 2010
4:08 pm
Grandad
You already know the answer to the question of Big Z’s chances of joining the Hawks.
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
4:11 pm
Big Z loses his puppet commercial if he doesn;t return to Cavs. But good to know that Sund may in fact look to add a vet.
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
4:12 pm
Find Ian Thomsen (si.com columnist) interview link below (sorry for earlier problem).
http://www.790thezone.com/instantreplay/Episodes.aspx?PID=1348
Jody
February 18th, 2010
4:14 pm
Although I doubt it happens, adding a center like Big Z would be the kind of move that would make the very formidable against elite teams because, with Z’s shooting ability, it allows Atl to play Horford and Smith together in a lineup where they not only exploit there athletic ability, but also would be able to exploit there size in the post in the halfcourt set. Post scoring is essential to playoff success and with a guy like Z on the floor with Al and Josh, teams would have to double them on get killed inside where it really hurts.
RomeDawg
February 18th, 2010
4:15 pm
Seems like this could be the Spirit’s chance to show they WANT to win!
Benjamin
February 18th, 2010
4:16 pm
Z’s on his last legs. I wouldn’t want him.
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
4:16 pm
Astro,
The Hawks said they would make an exception for Big Z to be added. Not that they are willing/looking to add another player.
ryan
February 18th, 2010
4:18 pm
What i think is going to happen is the hawks are going to wait until the summer time to make moves. I think Bibby is gone also Marvin Williams is to we resign Joe Johnson and go after Chris Bosh !
Michael Cunningham
February 18th, 2010
4:21 pm
@ o’brien: yep, Cavs clear faves for Z but as you say significance here is Hawks at least willing to consider adding 14th player.
for everyone thinking this is a PR move, i can tell you Hawks’ interest in Z is real (if not realistic).
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
4:32 pm
Michael/Anyone ???
Someone mentioned on another blog [JS] that Cleve. has to wait 30 days to re-sign ‘z’, thus making him ineligible for play-offs, is that true?
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
4:35 pm
P.S. – Eligible players must be signed before Mar. 1st evidently.
blord
February 18th, 2010
4:37 pm
I would love to see him in the ATL but think he shoots his next jumper in a Cavs uniform.
Cunningham Check Your Facts
February 18th, 2010
4:38 pm
0% chance Ilgauskas ends up in ATL. Actually -0%. He is re-signing in CLE. He is a good friend of Cavs GM Danny Ferry. Ferry would not trade him with out knowing that Z would be coming back. Plus he has no reason to leave. This has been very carefully orchestrated for months. There is no “mix” of teams. These teams might be delusional, like you, but I assure you its not happening.
Grandad do the math. Playoffs don’t start until the end of April. We are in February. 30 days from now is only Mid-March. There will be at least a dozen or so games left when Z returns.
O'Brien
February 18th, 2010
4:38 pm
This has been a crazy trade deadline. Was it Woody or Sund who said they didnt think there would be much acticity this trade deadline?
Knicks could have $30 mil salary cap space this summer. Wow. Cap experts, will they have enough cap space to afford 2 max deals (like LeBron and Wade)? Or will they have to settle for LeBron and JJ?
Bulls will have room to come after JJ too. ASG is going to have to step their game up this offseason, because JJ will have all the power in negotiations (unlike Josh, Childress, or Marvin who were all restricted).
O'Brien
February 18th, 2010
4:39 pm
* would be much ‘actiVity’
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
4:40 pm
GeeMack, good point, Z wasn’t exactly successful against Orlando last year in the playoffs. I still think someone with a Perkins-type of stocky build is better suited against Howard than a tall, slender player. I vote for Etan Thomas if he is bought out (and healthy). Or Tony Battie, who practiced with Howard for a few years in Orlando.
tyger
February 18th, 2010
4:44 pm
Hawks shooting blanks…
While everyone else improves their team, the Hawks leave their Viagra at home. They aren’t going to do anything, they cant do anything, they’re impotent! Moreover, ATL isnt the type of team where a guy is going to fall to them after a buyout. They still want to get paid, so to think Z or Gooden is going to come to ATL for minimum wage is a wet dream.
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
4:45 pm
Melvin, then I wonder if part of their interest is to keep Z away from the Cavs. Kind of like the Red Sox and Yankees often sign someone just to keep that player off the other team’s roster. While Z is an upgrade as a pick and pop guy over Zaza, we seem to be missing other skill sets that can be addressed with others. If Sund says “Z or bust”, I have to question the bust part.
darrell starks
February 18th, 2010
4:45 pm
YES RICK SUND BRING HIN HERE PERFECT FIT.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!
KevinM
February 18th, 2010
4:46 pm
I don’t think that Z will make that much of a difference unless you are just trying to keep him away from Cleveland. Then I can understand the logic, should Shaq just fade in the playoffs.
Z takes minutes away from Smoove and Al and I don’t see him making much of a difference. A Brendon Heyward move would have been better.
Signing Bibby and Marvin this year to MYC is gonna do more damage than good going forward.
Not looking forward to seeing Orlando or Cleveland in a playoff matchup this year.
cp
February 18th, 2010
4:46 pm
Yea we can forget about Big Z. He will be going back to the Cavs as soon as he can. I like the idea of adding Etan or Battie but do they give us anything more than Joe Smith at this point?
ant banks
February 18th, 2010
4:49 pm
hey y’all what is our plan B? with so many teams havin’ money to throw at joe, what do we do if he doesn’t sign? we will have approximately 16mil to burn on someone and we still have chill’s rights.
WHAT IS OUR PLAN B IF JJ LEAVES? THIS IS THE QUESTION OF THE DAY
darrell starks
February 18th, 2010
4:50 pm
STARTER BIBBY, JOE, JOSH, HORFORD, BIG Z.
BENCH JAMAL, MOE, MARVIN, JOE SMITH, ZAZA.
RESERVE TEAGUE, WEST.
STREET CLOTHES MORRIS, COLLINS.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
Dukester9
February 18th, 2010
4:56 pm
Yes people we need a 7 footer but not one that likes to shoot 3ptrs. Yes he is pretty good at it and i like him but we needed a bruiser like Dalembert who is a tough low post rebounder and defender. This trade would have been great we would have switched 2 bad long contracts for one bad short contract. But at least we would have had hard nose interior defense for Howard and the rest of the playoffs.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=ygy8mba
darrell starks
February 18th, 2010
4:58 pm
WOW ZAZA AND BIG Z FROM RUSSIA, RICK SUND TELL ZAZA 2 CALL BIG Z AND LET HIM NO HE WILL STARTE.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!
Michael Cunningham
February 18th, 2010
5:03 pm
@check your facts: what facts do i need to check? what is it i am delusional about? all this post says is the Hawks are interested in Z and, according to his agent (who of course might just be trying to drive up the price), Z would be interested in the Hawks. it says nothing about the Hawks’ chances of getting Z (but my comment above says it’s not very likely).
man, sometimes i come on here and wonder if schools teach reading comprehension anymore. yes, that means you, mr. check your smack.
@ others: the rule is Z must be waived by March 1 to be eligible for a playoff roster. Cavs would have to wait 30 days after he’s waived. so theoretically he could be waived on Feb. 28 and Cavs could re-sign him on March 28.
Michael Cunningham
February 18th, 2010
5:04 pm
*check that: they could re-sign him after 30 days, which would be march 30.
Barry
February 18th, 2010
5:05 pm
Hey Y’all:
We need to get this guy, now. This will be a steal as when we got Bibby in our first playoff run.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
This is a SECRET from a HAWK FAN. TELL EVERTBODY!!!!!!!
………………………….”SHOCK THE WORLD!!!!”…………….
MsDee
February 18th, 2010
5:06 pm
ant banks,
Good question..I guess go after Wade..Wade would love to have Josh, Al & Crawford on his team..he would want to do what Joe couldnt do..take us to the finals!!
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
5:06 pm
cp, I think those guys are bulkier (especially Etan) and have more of a “center mindset” than Joe Smith. I think of Joe as a 3/4 tweener while Battie and Etan are more 4.5 tweeners. For pure bulk, you can’t get much bulkier than Jason Collins. And Zaza has no problems playing rugged ball. But Horford is the only one with the agility to move laterally with Howard. Not to mention that being able to defend the pick and roll/pop plays against Orlando is key. I can’t envision Collins being effective when Orlando plays pick and roll between Howard and Vince Carter. That’s when a quicker big would be a much better option.
Traceman
February 18th, 2010
5:15 pm
Marvin is certainly having a down year compared to what he did last year (when he was actually quite good) but he has not been NEARLY as bad as many of you make him out to be. The biggest reason for his signigicant dip in production is that he is getting fewer opportunities due to the OUTSTANDING performance of Jamal. This is CLEAR when you look at his PER and particularly, his usage rate. Currently, his usage rate is the lowest it has been in his entire CAREER, including his rookie season.
Still, in this DOWN year, he sits at 20th in the NBA among SFs in PER and his PER is higher than these players, many of whom so many of you want to trade him for:
Hedo Turkoglu
Ron Artest
Shane Battier
Travor Ariza
Ryan Gomes
Richard Jefferson
Josh Howard
Al Thornton
Tayshaun Prince
Matt Barnes
Mike Dunleavy
John Salmons
Yi Jianlian
Andres Nocioni
Boris Diaw
He’s only slightly behind Caron Butler. (Marvin’s PER is 13.22 and Butler’s is 13.48.)
Marvin’s PER was 16.4 last year which would put him at #11 in the NBA among SFs right now. If he can get back to that level of production, which I have no doubt that he can, I think that would be great for our team and that is more production than we would get from most of the proposals that have popped up on this board.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/statistics?position=sf
In addition, note that JJ and Jamal are 5th and 6th respectively in PER among all SGs; Smoove is 5th among all PFs (and some of you want to move him to SF – yeah right!); and Al is 12th among Centers. That is OUTSTANDING. In addition, all 4 are having the best years of their CAREERS with regard to PER at the same time. That is incredible!
As for Bibby, he is currently 44th among PGs which is WAY off where he was last year. If he was producing at the same level as last year, he would be 20th among PGs. Like Marvin, some of his decline in production has been due to Jamal’s GREAT play as his uasge rate is also the lowest it has been in his entire career. I think it is pretty obvious that Bibby is slowing down but the arrival of Crawford and his play more than make up for Bibby. Bibby can just focus on providing a steady hand and veteran leadership.
Finally, another thing that gives me hope about Marvin is that Josh had a bad season by his standards last year after signing the new deal. Then this season, he is having his best season BY FAR. His PER is almost 5 points higher this year than it was last year (22.00 this year vs 17.28 last year). That is an astronomical jump and clearly illustrates just how much he has improved. No reason whatsoever Marvin can’t get back to where he was last year and I think he can be even better than that.
BILLY KNIGHT
February 18th, 2010
5:19 pm
YES IF THE HAWKS GET ZYDRUNAS ILGAUSKAS I CAN SEE THEM IN THE EASTERN CONF. FINALS PLAYING THE CAVS.
KevinM
February 18th, 2010
5:23 pm
I am guessing that based on the non-activity, Sund is content with Joe Smith contributing for our playoff run. I remember the courtship was long and drawn out and he hasn’t provided much to us during the season so far.
Well, we have JSmith, Morris and Collins. Can we just play the hack-a-Shaq rules and the hack-a-Howard rules for the playoffs this year? Sounds like that will be our best shot at ’stealing’ a road playoff game.
And I know, the cart before the horse, because we have to get to the playoffs first and worry about the matchups once we get there, but it looks obvious it will take 2 career playoff series to make progress with this current roster.
darrell starks
February 18th, 2010
5:26 pm
Enter your comments here
darrell starks
February 18th, 2010
5:27 pm
Big z!!!!!!!!
GO HAWKS!!!!
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
5:30 pm
KevinM, Jason Collins defended Shaq very well in the last game against the Cavs. Shaq will be the least of our problems against Cleveland. The Cavs have another guy who is pretty good and tends to be a little more difficult to defend.
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
5:32 pm
I hate it when y’all get yourselves worked up in a frenzy over a specific player and then when the football is pulled out from you…
Oh well. Enjoy the fantasy.
Traceman
February 18th, 2010
5:34 pm
Ant Banks & Ms Dee,
We won’t have anywhere NEAR enough money to sign D Wade if JJ walks. BEST CASE, we’ll have around $10M to spend on a FA and that is assuming the cap doesn’t DROP (which is certainly possible). Instead of D Wade, we’ll be trying to sign the likes of David Lee (who we don’t need) or perhaps an old guy like Ginobili or Ray Allen. BEST CASE would be Rudy Gay but he is bound to have more lucrative offers from teams with more cap room and that doesn’t even take into account that his current team can offer him the most money. Face it, if we don’t resign JJ, we are going to take a significant step back.
David Smith
February 18th, 2010
5:37 pm
Big Z would fit in perfectly here. I’m worried about how Woody would use him if Sund pulled the trigger to get him here. Z is a big that can stretch opposing defenses with his perimeter game but, Woody has proven to say one thing (”We finally have a bench that I trust to play more”, “I need to give our guys on the bench more minutes”) and do another (Work our starters to death, Continue to stunt the growth of Jeff Teague and failure to develop the bench players by not trusting them with minutes, and playing “Woody Ball” using the “Iso Joe” offense in the fourth quarter.
NoleRick
February 18th, 2010
5:49 pm
Overpay this guy! He would be the perfect fit for this team!
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
5:54 pm
Astro,
Did you actually reference the Hawks in the same sentence with the Yankees and Red Sox? Comeon, you are talking about to the BASG here… You know, the fiancially challenge ownership group.
Traceman
February 18th, 2010
5:56 pm
Ilgauskas would be an excellent acquisition but I’m not holding my breath. I’m sure the Cavs already talked to him about resigning before the deal was even made.
Still, the ASG and Sund should pull out all the stops to try and convince him to change his mind and come down here. It’s not JUST about the Cavs, Magic and Celtics for us and he would help us significantly against other teams as well.
He can’t guard Howard but he can pull him away from the basket on the other end which is just as important for us. He would cause problems for BOS and CLE as well for the same reasons (not to mention that he we would be keeping him away from CLE).
I don’t see it happening but it is a nice dream.
Chris D'
February 18th, 2010
6:05 pm
How much money can the Hawks offer him that is an important question. If the Hawks are under the cap and the other teams pursuing him are well over the cap an extra million might entice him to head down here. Dallas can only offer $1.3 million what can the Hawks offer?
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
6:10 pm
I don’t get it. He’s slow, essentially a jump-shooter and was run off the court in the playoff series against the Magic last year. I don’t get all of the Z love. Isn’t Raef LaFrentz available?
Hawk n the Ham
February 18th, 2010
6:25 pm
Games against the Magic, starting 5
1. Bibby
2. Johnson
3. Smoove <- Yes, I put Smoove there :p
4. Horford
5. Big Z
I would throw all the double and triple teams at Howard with these guys on the floor.
Hawk n the Ham
February 18th, 2010
6:28 pm
Plus, you can hack & foul Howard all you want and send him to the line when you have Big Z, Horford, Zaza, & Collins to share the fouls
vava74
February 18th, 2010
6:30 pm
I already said this on the previous blog but I will repeat:
Ziggy MORE THAN HINTED that he will be retiring at the end of the season.
At this stage of his career he couldn’t care less about minutes or dollars.
It is pretty obvious that he will resign with the Cavs where he his at home and barring a Lebron’s injury he stands a better chance to win a ring.
As for all the nonsense with absurd hypotetical trades and signings if JJ walks, please read the regulations, check the bare facts and use something called “brain” before posting more nonsense.
Also, PER, +- and Efficiency stats are ONLY stats and not gospel.
It’s impossible to have all players in the roster improving their stars at the same time. The only stat that matters is the win-loss total and for the moment we are sitting pretty, coming from where we came. Let’s keep cool and hope for further growth until the end of the season.
vava74
February 18th, 2010
6:33 pm
Is at home. Damn iPhone!
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
6:43 pm
CCYF:
MR. Cunningham explained it nicely.
As far as doing arithmatic, I caan do that too.
I was asking a question.
As Mr. ‘C’ brought to our attn., perhaps your reading skills are worse than my math skills.
Under the premis with which my querie was posed, Mr. Ilgauskas would not have been eligible for the play-offs if he were not signed by 3/1/10, which could not be accomplished if he had to wait 30 days to sign. However, that is evidently not the case as Mr. Cunningham so
eloquently answered to our collective curiosity.
I will readily admit that arithmatic is not my long suit.
Please refrain from asking me to do the math in the future and I will not ask you to comprehend an admitted complex paragraph such as the aforementioned rambling concerning Zydrunas’ potential play-off entitlement and or admissibility.
Thanks and have a nice day !
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
6:43 pm
CCYF:
MR. Cunningham explained it nicely.
As far as doing arithmatic, I caan do that too.
I was asking a question.
As Mr. ‘C’ brought to our attn., perhaps your reading skills are worse than my math skills.
Under the premis with which my querie was posed, Mr. Ilgauskas would not have been eligible for the play-offs if he were not signed by 3/1/10, which could not be accomplished if he had to wait 30 days to sign. However, that is evidently not the case as Mr. Cunningham so
eloquently answered to our collective curiosity.
I will readily admit that arithmatic is not my long suit.
Please refrain from asking me to do the math in the future and I will not ask you to comprehend an admitted complex paragraph such as the aforementioned rambling concerning Zydrunas’ potential play-off entitlement and or admissibility.
Thanks and have a nice day !
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
6:48 pm
I have no idea why the post showed up twice, buut thee 2 a’s in caan are juust pooor tyyping skiils..
Trint
February 18th, 2010
6:50 pm
MC, just a quick question about Marvin. I think he has definitely underachieved and theres no doubt that he’s regressing, but I saw him in with the 2nd unit last night and he seemed to be more aggressive. Is this something Woody may be looking to do more of? Have you heard anything regarding this
mrHonline
February 18th, 2010
7:12 pm
MC,
The Hawks can offer up to $3M more than the Cavs to nab Ilgauskas. Any chance the Spirit would be willing to commit up to $4.5M to get him?
DeepSuthHawksFan
February 18th, 2010
7:17 pm
MsDee – can you be original? keep talking the same theme night in and night out about JJ shortcomings, gets really tiring. If you don’t have something to add to MC’s topic, stay off the thread.
Big Z will be a good addition to our team, no matter how you look at it
vava74
February 18th, 2010
7:33 pm
Here’s my preferred NBA analyst’s view on the trades:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/breaking-down-every-nba-trade-021810
niremetal
February 18th, 2010
7:40 pm
Z won’t care about the money. Dude has made $125M in his career, but is now in his last or next-to-last season and still doesn’t have a ring. He’ll go where he thinks he has the best shot of winning a title, assuming he gets bought out. That’s probably Cleveland. Denver would be next. If it comes to down to us and Dallas for some reason, I can see us coming out on top, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. Z is not someone who strikes me as being at all about the Benjamins.
KevinA
February 18th, 2010
7:45 pm
Astro Joe
Finally got to the link – thanks. Liked the Woody interview also.
ant banks
February 18th, 2010
7:47 pm
DEEPSUTHHAWKSFAN,
i have searched the last 4 blogs for your comments and you ain’t said nathan. so why you want to knock ms dee for havin’ an opinion? most people on hear reiterate their positions over and over CLYDE AND KEN always want to fire woody, some hate marvin. some love marvin. some hate bibby some love him.
jus’ come wit’ some good points yourself and not focus on who is repetitive. FURTHERMORE, big z won’t be signed until 30 days from now, surely you will come on here again and say “Big Z will be a good addition to our team, no matter how you look at it.” which would make your sayin’ the same
sh!t
Ken Strickland
February 18th, 2010
7:49 pm
We all know Ilkgausas would fit Woodson’s love for jumpshooters, but can you imagine he and Bibby teaming up to defend the pick and roll? Orlando took advantage of his inability to defend it and defeated Cleveland in the playoffs, while everyone takes advantage of Bibby’s inability to defend anything. However, BIBBY LOVERS do like to pretend otherwise and go silent about Bibby whenever DEF is mentioned. However, unlike Bibby he can contribute in other ways, because he’ll block a few shots, rebound and score consistently.
We really do need a Big that Woody will play. JCollins is too one dimensional, he can’t seem to figure out how and when to use JSmith, and he apparently doesn’t like RMorris and is giving him the WOODY TREATMENT. Otherwise, how do you explain Woodson’s preference for dressing a 6′5″ OFF challenged player over a 6′11″ OFF gifted player?
The Hawks are the equivilent of a modern sports car that’s been designed and built for high speed travel and handling, but it’s being powered by a 4 cylinder engine.
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
7:54 pm
Strickland, so does that mean Mo Williams was ineffective defending the pick and roll last year?
lgwest
February 18th, 2010
8:03 pm
Fixed,Fixed, Fixed game over. Don;t believe me just ask King James.
The fans of the other 28 teams be dam, Lakers excluded.
Dam, dam,dammmmmmm!
lgwest
February 18th, 2010
8:05 pm
If King James is so good why does he need so mach help?
KevinA
February 18th, 2010
8:06 pm
Next summer is when we worry about JJ, his contract and what it means to our options. I would like to judge Marvin next year at this time. I don’t know if you have noticed but his FG% is up to .442. In his last 20 games he has come back. If he can carry the same type of play going forward he could make a big difference in the playoffs. I do not worry about his point averages. I think we could agree that Al should get more shots. I like the fact Marvin is like Chills in the fact they shoot when open or drive and get fouls. They play within themselves. Marvin is not hurting this team. Would it be nice for him to be more aggressive? Sure. But only when the guards and the big’s are having an off night. He needs to pick his spots.
To give Woody credit, he did cut Marvin’s minutes when he was in a shooting slump. His minutes are going up now that he is shooting better. Same with Bibby, he is in a semi slump but when he gets it back his minutes will go up.
Al has played so well that ZaZa minutes are down. ZaZa just has a little rust and a recent injury. He will be fine.
At the end of the day I see no changes to the team till summer. We still have upside with no changes.
ATL Hawks #1 Lady Fan/Mz. Hawkdafied
February 18th, 2010
8:15 pm
I agree with dstdeelite. Z is too slow. He runs in slow motion. I think the Hawks should go after Amare instead. Let Z go back to the Cavs. You guys complain of the team relying on jump shots and yet wish to add a vet who mostly shoots jumpers. Anywayz no to Ilgauskas, yes to Stoudemire.
vava74
February 18th, 2010
8:19 pm
I’m watching the Nuggets @ CLE.
Game more or less tied in the first quarter:
Shaq catches the rock in the low post, rotates baseline pushing Nene with left elbow and lays it in. 2 points, no charge.
Following possession: Nene catches a ‘Melo airball, jumps for the lay up, is projected more than a foot to the side by Shaq, misses the lay up, no call. Shaq gets the rebound.
Another day at the office…
Shortly after:
Charge by JJ Hickson converted into +1…
By the way, the TNT’ color commentary team was “complaining” about the log jam at the PF position:
JJ Hickson, Varejão and Jamison. AT NO STAGE they made reference to Varejão being Shaq’s replacement, a clear indication that in their eyes, Ziggy is still a Cavalier who is only on leave…
Ken Strickland
February 18th, 2010
8:20 pm
NIREMETAL-Since Dallas’ starting center EDampier is out due to a broken finger, Ilgouskas might make them his #1 choice. He’d certainly have an excellent chance of becoming their starting center.
ANT BANKS-thanks for addressing DEEPSUTHHAWKSFAN. Since we discuss the same team, and generally the same topics on a daily basis, who but a complete idiot would find it hard to believe participants wouldn’t often be repetitive? How many different ways can one discuss the same subject matter without becoming redundant? I know I can’t. Hell, if the truth be told, we’re all repetitive, some more so than others.
It never ceases to amaze me how individuals will develop a disdane for certain persons and/or their comments, and feel they’re being repetitive, yet will repeatedly read their comments and become angry with them because they’re too stupid to use the scroll button.
KevinA
February 18th, 2010
8:20 pm
Ken Strickland
Jamal should play more PG and drop Bibby to 20 minutes till he gets his shot back. Run Bibby for 5 minutes and if we are getting killed defensively try Teague for 5 and if that fails, bring in Jamal. Even Evans can play the point. Not many teams pressure the ball any more and it’s mainly just a hand off to JJ and Jamal.
KevinA
February 18th, 2010
8:26 pm
The perfect night – a Clev and Boston loss. Almost much fun as winning.
Najeh Davenpoop
February 18th, 2010
8:33 pm
I can’t imagine a scenario where Big Z would come to the Hawks, or any other team for that matter, over staying with the team that he’s been with for the last 12 years. Of course acquiring him would only help, and I’m all for it if it’s a realistic possibility, but right now I don’t think it is.
Drew Gooden, on the other hand, is a realistic acquisition which the Hawks should make if/when he gets bought out.
By the way, the Grizzlies traded only a second-round pick for Ronnie Brewer, a 6′7″ former lottery pick G-F who defends well and is efficient offensively. Brewer makes $2.7 million this year and is due a qualifying offer next year, which a team can refuse to exercise if they wish. If the Hawks had traded for him, he would have essentially replaced Mo Evans in the rotation, and would have provided a much needed extra swingman defender off the bench. The fact that the Hawks didn’t make such a deal either tells me that Rick Sund is not creative or that $2.7 million is too much for the ASG to add to the payroll, and neither idea makes me feel very good.
Horford Rox
February 18th, 2010
8:35 pm
MC and the blog:
How much $ did the NBA “lose” last year? Thought I heard 400 mil. If that actually is the case, then the league has a serious problem. If anybody has some good insight, I welcome your thoughts.
Also, I agree with all that say Ilguaskas would make the Hawx a legitimate contender in the East. But, I also agree with those who say he’ll definitely end up back in James-town. Basically, the Cavs stole Jameson from the Wiz. These types of “trades” cheapen the integrity of the leauge. The NBA has become of dysfunctional product of contenders vs cap room savers. Looking out west, I see the LA Clippers as an example of the latter. They got involved in a 3 team deal that landed Antawn Jameson in Cleveland and Zydrunas Ilguaskas in D.C. for about 30 days. What did the Clips get? The all mighty expiring contract! The contract of 8.9 PPG Drew Gooden, that is up at the end of the season. Mike Dunleavy (courtesy of the LA Times) had this to say, “The major consideration was to put ourselves in position to hit a homerun.” Translation: We’re clearing out cap space now, in an effort to land Lebron James, Dwyane Wade, or Chris Bosh and Joe Johnson over the summer.
The Times also quotes Dunleavy as saying, “The end result was that we were able to get the cap space that we deem necessary for the coming off season.”
Am I beginning to sound redundant? Yes. But, it’s what I call redundancy with a purpose. Ha. What do ya’ll think of teams that willingly trade talent for cap space? What about traded players being bought out and returning to their former squad? I believe these practices are detrimental to the league.
Go Hawx!! Beat em’ or beat em up!
jerrywest
February 18th, 2010
8:36 pm
Look at the ESPN PER. Among the non-suspended 20+ minutes per game players in the East, Hawks have 4 of the top 13 players. (Don’t count Artest/Nazr/Speight)
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/statistics?league=east&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnba%2fhollinger%2fstatistics%3fleague%3deast
Blast
February 18th, 2010
8:41 pm
I do hope Denver knocks Cleveland off a peg or two tonight by snapping Cavs win streak. Come to think of it, Cleveland is really a boring team apart from LeBron, and maybe Hickson. They play a lot of Iso ball, lots of one on one for different players, guards dribble the ball until shot clock winds down… Sounds familiar?
The last two blogs were crazy! What’s up with one person posting in different names, then talking to themselves? Is their lives that sad? What a shame.
If Hawks could get Big Z, that would be great, but Z is going back to Cleveland. Absolutely no reason he won’t. I do like the fact that Hawks are willing to add a big man to the roster, though.
Some folks said they will be good if Hawks go 2-2 or 3-1 on this Western swing. I think if they play to capacity, they can go 4-0.
Go Hawks!!!!!
Najeh Davenpoop
February 18th, 2010
8:41 pm
PER is an insanely overrated stat, just like everything else John Hollinger comes up with in his evil lair. Using purely statistics to analyze a team sport is idiotic. I can’t even count how many times Hollinger has written a column with the basic premise of “my stats say one thing, but common sense and observation say something totally different, but here’s why my stats are right anyway”. He makes for interesting reading, the same way a car crash makes for interesting viewing, but using him to back up your arguments is not a great idea.
richbrave
February 18th, 2010
8:50 pm
I suppose BIG Z will be similar to GOODEN in that he will never play in a WIZARDS uniform.
DOMINIC McGUIRE went back to the west coast at the deadline. His expiring was bought out for $300,000 and the WIZ got the KINGS second rounder in the next draft. This last move finally got the WIZ out of the luxury tax problem.
Ken Strickland
February 18th, 2010
8:51 pm
ASTRO JOE-Was your response an attempt to imply Bibby isn’t a liability when it comes to defending pick and rolls? I’m sure you know it takes 2 players minimum to successfully defend a good pick and roll. If one doesn’t get the job done the effort generally fails. So, whether Mo Williams did his job doesn’t matter if Ilgouskas didn’t do his. At any rate, we all saw the end result in last yrs playoffs.
Sid
February 18th, 2010
8:52 pm
LOL @ everyone complaining about Big z shooting jumpers when in fact thats exactly the type of Big that we would need to open up the floor against a Howard or Perkins because they have to respect is shot.
Big Z is a 20 mpg player which is great because thats all we need him for. he would give us another veteran who can plug the lanes and use his 6 fouls . This guy is HUGE and thats what we need against certain teams .
Blast
February 18th, 2010
8:52 pm
Carmelo needs to step it up!
Allowing Z to be traded, then sign back with the team that traded him is a loophole in the system that Stern needs to fix. That is called ‘tampering!’
Blast
February 18th, 2010
8:56 pm
Denver is getting jobbed in this game vs Cavs. Cleveland getting all the calls, Denver getting none. Sounds familiar?
Blast
February 18th, 2010
9:15 pm
http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/americas-most-miserable-cities-2010
Interesting read about Cleveland. Maybe we see why LeBron might want to leave and Cleveland is desperate to keep him.
KevinA
February 18th, 2010
9:24 pm
Sid
February 18th, 2010
8:52 pm
LOL @ everyone complaining about Big z shooting jumpers when in fact thats exactly the type of Big that we would need to open up the floor against a Howard or Perkins because they have to respect is shot.
I agree with what Z brings. So why we don’t use Al like this against the huge big’s is beyond me. Al has showed some range this year – so what do we do? Drive in the teeth of the defense. We should at least give Al three four shots early in the game. If he pops them then Howard, Shaq and the rest would have to move out to guard them. Who better than JJ to feed him from the corner. If they double either one we should have an open shot. JJ is 23-53 .434 FG% from the right 3 pt corner.
Horford Rox
February 18th, 2010
9:32 pm
MC and the blog:
Are the Hawx tough enough to contend with teams such as Orlando and Cleveland in the playoffs? The path to the NBA Finals will likely run through both towns. Does ATL have what it takes to conquer these foes? Judging by the regular season matchups, I’d (relucantly) say no. Do the Hawx need a Kevin Willis-esque enforcer? (2 years ago, Zaza bowed up to KG, but has he lost that fire and intensity?)
Go Hawx!! Beat ‘em or beat em up!
Horford Rox
February 18th, 2010
9:35 pm
relucantly should be relucTantly…. My 8th grade education becomes more prevelant as I type. Ha!
Go Hawx!! Beat ‘em or beat em up!
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
9:40 pm
Hawks may need to keep an eye on the Bobcats. They may buyout one of their big men Nazr, Chandler, Thomas, Diop, and Alexis.
The Spurs have traded Theo Ratliff to Charlotte, source tells Y! Sports.
KevinA
February 18th, 2010
9:42 pm
Ken Strickland
Any guard with no D suffers when they are cold. Our huckleberries are Jamal, Bibby and Teague. One young, one old and one just not used to being expected to do it. Jamal is our hope for the playoffs. They fact is – it is what we got. I like the fact woody keeps pushing Jamal. He has 30 games to figure to improve.
Wabe
February 18th, 2010
9:42 pm
I agree with Kevin. Big Z’s ability to stretch the floor would keep Howard out of the paint, which would open up the lane for guys like JJ and Jamal. It seems we’ve resorted to jumpshots when playing Orlando because Howard alters everything we try to do inside. Big Z’s ability to hit the 3 could be the answer we’re looking for against Orlando.
As much sense as it makes, at this point, I highly doubt Big Z ends up anywhere but Cleveland.
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
9:55 pm
Blast,
According to your link, look like the Hawks need to make a strong push with a S&T for Rudy Gay since Memphis is one of the worst city to living in…
Blast
February 18th, 2010
10:12 pm
If Nuggets moved the ball better, they could find open shooters like Smith, Chauncey, Carmelo and what not for the open shot.
Blast
February 18th, 2010
10:13 pm
I hear you, Melvin!
O'Brien
February 18th, 2010
10:15 pm
Najeh,
I find it hard to believe that Sund could not find a way to trade a draft pick for a player that could help us this season. We dont know if JJ will resign, so it would have been good to show him that we are constantly trying to improve the team.
I will play devil’s advocate on here, because I dont see how Big Z would be a big help to us (unless ZaZa or Horford gets injured). He’s not very tough, and he’s light.
And where would he get minutes? And does anyone have confidence that Woody would utilize him correctly (ie, draw Howard out). Plus that didnt work against the Magic last playoff series.
I guess what I’m wondering is maybe Sund is saying he is interested in Big Z because he knows he wont come here, but at least Sund will look good in the eyes of the fans and players.
Traceman,
I’m surprised Rod from CP hasn’t picked up on this. You said Marvin was quite good last year. Thats not true. His defense was good, but he averaged 14 points and 6 rebs per game in 35 minutes. Sure, he had a couple good games when Joe was out, but overall, he still had his disappearing moments.
I agree that last year he was playing better than he is this year, but I dont think he was “quite good” last year. That being said, this is only year 1 of his contract, and he’s only 23. So he has time to turn it around, and the Hawks need for him to turn it around.
If not, he will lose his spot as a “core player”.
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
10:19 pm
The Refs are killing the Nuggets… If they look at the Cavs the wrong way it’s a foul then they get away with Ric Flair slap downs on defense…
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
10:22 pm
Ken Strickland:
Is it just me. I seem to have noticed quite a bit of improvement in Jamal’s defense as this year has unfolded.
Also I’ve noticed when we trap, even with all the switching, that as a whole, our defense looks much better. Perhaps we should credit this in large part to everyone seeming to understand where they are supposed to be, when switches are to occur, etc. In other words experience and repitition.
On another note – Teaguer seems to be playing without spirit and enthusiasm. When he arrived, he was brimming with confidence and
eagerness. Now he doesn’t even push the ball, he defers to other guards and scoots down the floor, spots up and watches the game.
As for those who think that ZI will slow down our running game…Wdsn slows us down more than ZI ever could. Also do you not think that J.Collins does the same thing but brings less to the table? Besides, ZI can keep up with Bibby, when is the last time you saw Bibby push the break?
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
10:22 pm
With the way these Refs are officiating the Cavs games, the league is going to lose more than 400 mil per year b/c folks are going to stop paying good money to see this foolishness…
Horford Rox
February 18th, 2010
10:41 pm
Did Boston really get N8 Robinson?
Go Hawx…blah, blah, blah… (ya’ll know the tag line by now).
Dick Berry Long
February 18th, 2010
10:42 pm
Id rather have Mr I start and Horford off the bench. We need the defense and Josh is a better Power forward that Al. Bottom line is there is enough minutes for all three, but I also think this is a scam to make the fan base think they are trying to plug this major bleeding artery, when in fact, they are content to have a good season rather that a banner season.
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
10:46 pm
Melvin:
I’m not trying to get anything started, but Rudy Gay is basically a clone of Marvin. Size, length, Marvin shoots the ‘3′ a little better,
RG finishes stronger resuting in higher fg%, MW better ft, reb./asst./
bl./ a wash. RG more min. RG more points. RG would score less on this team.
On another note…I’ve said before…Stern’s an attorney. As far as I know; NO b-ball background. HGe sees NBA as entertainment not competition. Results = Pro wrestling. ‘LeBron’s a clown !
O’Brien:
Trades – We could have made a trade.
Makes more sense to wait until summer.
Players like Marv[BYC]. I believe June 30 is magic date.
Players like ZI don’t cost us an assey.
One player I wish we could have acquired; Mason from SA.
Jody
February 18th, 2010
10:46 pm
All these PER numbers for players that continue to be thrown out are quite nice to look at and I’m sure if that decided who wins the East, the Hawks would be in good shape. However, the truth of the matters is they don’t. This team clearly struggles against the size of the Magic and the Cavs, two teams the Hawks will have to go through to get to where they need to go. I’m glad to see the Hawks looking to address this by exploring the possibility of signing someone who may get bought out. However, if altering the lineup at times against these and other teams would help offset the size disadvantage and possibly reveal other advantages, the idea needs to be considered.
The Truth
February 18th, 2010
10:48 pm
I’m just pissed that Sund seems to have a reactionary strategy while the other teams (both play-off-bound and lottery) are initiating the action and being creative. Go back during preseason, management paraded all those players into camp to only find Hunter who got cut 2 months later. When Hunter was cut for Mario I knew management was clueless as to their game-plan and playoff acquisition strategy. Now management wants us to believe they are salivating for Big Z if he is available. Then what the hell was acquiring Collins was all about when he has rarely played? If he was that much of a bust, then why didn’t he get cut also? Perhaps Woody is to blame for that but it begs the question. What is Sund involvement and influence in these matters? Is he just a fly on the wall? I think Sund was pressured by the media to pretend to be involved in trading activity to give the appearance that he is doing his job. We call this CYA. I heard comments such as “Big Z is the exception to the rules”; ON REALLY!! One minute it’s not possible for the Hawks to do anything (as a rule) as previously been stated, then out of the blue, it is now possible. If Big Z agent is actually flirting with the Hawks, it’s only for negotiation leverage to re-sign with Cleveland. So in that case, it’s a win-win for Sund and Big Z’s agent. Sund will pacify the Hawks Fans with a brave effort (but come up short) and Big Z will get a better offer from Cleveland. THAT IS REALLY THE BIGGER PICTURE.
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
10:51 pm
No b-ball background. He sees……….
Can’t type a lick !
Jody
February 18th, 2010
10:52 pm
The officiating in this Cavs-Nuggets game is simply atrocious and bias to say the least.
The Troof Hurts
February 18th, 2010
10:54 pm
Yep.
Grandad
February 18th, 2010
11:01 pm
DBL=Sybil – I saw you on the other blog. Al @ the ‘3′. That was funny.
Horford off the bench, c’mon. Did you ever see the “Gong Show” on TV.
You’re like one of the contestants…too bad you can’t get the hook on this blog. ‘Course I might get it too.
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
11:16 pm
Memphis we have your consolation prize “Marvin Willams”. Can we get a S&T with Memphis for Rudy Gay. Get it done Sund this summer…
From Adrian Wojnarowski, NBA columnist for Yahoo:
Ronnie brewer has been traded to grizzlies for a pick, source says.
about 8 hours ago from UberTwitter
This means Memphis is unlikely to pay Rudy Gay this summer.
about 8 hours ago from UberTwitter
Melvin
February 18th, 2010
11:19 pm
Grandad,
Its obivious that you need to watch a few Grizzly game. If you think Marvin and Rudy are similiar players…. I guess that why Rudy is gonna get a near max deal and Marvin end up with 40 mil deal?
Traceman
February 18th, 2010
11:46 pm
O’Brien,
Yes, if Marvin could give us 14 and 6 while shooting 46% from the field (58% true shooting percentage) and playing solid D as a 4th (or 5th) option, I would consider that “quite good.” How many 4th or 5th options average more than that?
I agree that Marvin had his disappearing moments last year but he still had very solid numbers considering his place in the pecking order. If you judge Marvin as the #2 overall pick taken ahead of Paul and Deron Williams, 14 and 6 falls short. If you judge him as the 4th or 5th option that he currently is on this team (and that he is being paid to be), 14 and 6 is solid in my book.
As you said, Marvin is still only 23 and I think he has the talent to exceed 14 and 6 going forward. I still consider him a core player and I am confident that he will continue to develop be a key contributor for us forthe forseeable future.
Astro Joe
February 18th, 2010
11:54 pm
I don’t understand why all 5 starters can’t average at least 18 points and everyone on the bench at least 10. Sure, that would equal 140 points per game, but if we had an offensive coordinator, I don’t see why that wouldn’t be possible. (He said sarcastically before retiring for the night).
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
12:05 am
Melvin would you give Rudy max money? He can’t shoot worth beans.
I’m not saying he’s a bad player. Neither am I saying Marv is a bad player. I am saying, for the money, I’d rather have Marv. Better deal.
Same player[virtually]. Less money.
If I were looking for a perimeter player to spend big money, then he darn sure would have to shoot better than 31% from ‘3′, rebound better than 5 per, and asst better than 2 per, and at least be a 2nd team defense. (for max money or anything near) Of course you have obviously watched Mem. play and seen something that is not evidenced within the numbers. Does he make his teammate better? No evidence.
Measureables=identicle.[to Marv] Has he made Mem. a play-off team or even a winner? Not yet.
Your right, maybe I need to watch him more to see what your seeing that I’m not.
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
12:11 am
Najeh/O’Brien/etc,
The reason the Grizzlies were able to trade for Brewer was because the Grizzlies are actually under the cap. The Hawks are ~$10M over cap. We simply cannot trade for a player without matching salaries, and since the whole purpose of the Jazz’s trade was to shed payroll, we were not a feasible trade partner. Because we are over the cap, we simply are not allowed to trade just a draft pick for a player.
Get off it people. The Hawks are well over the cap, have no expiring contracts except JJ and the minimum salary guys, our biggest theoretically expendable contract is a BYC player (Marvin), and no other trade chips that other teams would be interested in (hint: Bibby) or we could afford to part with (hint: Smoove, Horford).
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
12:14 am
We used our two trading chips (Speedy and Acie) to acquire Jamal over the summer. That was our “deadline” deal. And I’d say it’s worked out pretty damn well. Does anyone think we could have done better with those trade chips?
I have yet to see a single person propose a feasible trade that would improve the team. Not a single one. Sorry to be so blunt, but it’s a lot easier to criticize when you have no ideas of your own.
ego head/bad attitude
February 19th, 2010
1:22 am
niremetal
Several trades have been offered that went through the trade machine. It is nice that you have an opinion but that does not mean your judgement is better than another. This round of trade talks are done. The next is the discussion of players that are bought out and if we should pick up some help.
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
1:33 am
Show me one. Just because it went through the trade machine doesn’t mean it’s feasible. This isn’t NBA Live. You can’t force another team to accept a trade.
nunna yo biznezz
February 19th, 2010
1:44 am
yo KevinA,
naw,keep crawfish away from the PG position..;please!!
yes he does make some nice passes but he also forces more that turn into turnovers as well..he never feeds teague the ball or let teague set up,but he is the first to go teague after the ball is brought up and screams for the ball..
teague needs to man up and run the dang offense,and let crawfish stick to his SG duties..
just get open jamaal and then let jteague pass u the ball for a jumper or a drive to da hoop mane!!
and i don’t know what yall have been seeing with bibbs..talking about a slump,lol…
the man is injured..he has not recovered from his injury at all..he hops,limps,skips,and ish..he is still hurt and he and woody,and it looks like i too,are the only ones who know it…
and,Sund did not make a trade for 2 reasons..yes he wants the core of the team to stay together..
but,he also has made a statement and letting woody know that this is his team..this is who he is gonna ride all da way to da finals if he is good enuff to get us there..its all on woody to develope his bench and his rook!! and he is doing niether..SUCKA!!
Najeh Davenpoop
February 19th, 2010
1:50 am
“The reason the Grizzlies were able to trade for Brewer was because the Grizzlies are actually under the cap. The Hawks are ~$10M over cap. We simply cannot trade for a player without matching salaries, and since the whole purpose of the Jazz’s trade was to shed payroll, we were not a feasible trade partner. Because we are over the cap, we simply are not allowed to trade just a draft pick for a player.”
I realize the Hawks are over the cap, but they do have enough expiring assets of their own to be able to match salaries with a guy getting paid $2.7 million this year. In fact, ESPN’s trade machine allows me to trade Mo Evans for Brewer straight up, and that would clearly upgrade this team in every way except in 3 point shooting (which the Hawks do well enough without Mo’s contributions anyway). Granted, trading Evans and a 2nd round pick for Brewer wouldn’t save the Jazz much money for the remainder of this season, but they would still get the pick and they wouldn’t have the cap hold of the qualifying offer this offseason hampering their ability to sign other players. My guess is the Jazz are more concerned about the offseason cap hold anyway, since that impacts their ability to keep Carlos Boozer.
More importantly, I doubt Ronnie Brewer is the only talented player who was available for such a bargain basement price this trade deadline. Considering the number of teams that looked to make salary-dump trades, some creativity could have probably landed the Hawks some other player who could have incrementally improved the team at a pretty low price. No, I don’t think the Hawks could have (or even necessarily should have) gotten a new starter or a high salary impact player like the Cavs and Rockets. But if you can give up basically nothing and get back a guy who is marginally better than what you have at the end of your bench, to me a trade like that is still worth it. At the very least, it’s worth a shot, rather than sitting on your hands and saying there are no moves we can make. In the NBA’s current financially driven climate, there’s ALWAYS a move you can make, even if it’s not a major move.
vava74
February 19th, 2010
2:34 am
I thought of the perfect fit for us, just in time of the playoffs.
Let’s just go back in a time machine and offer Marvin for Dominique.
It’s as feasible as 99% of the deals mentioned over here!
Don’t people realize that it takes 2 basic things to pull a trade:
1. obbey to the NBA rules on salaries;
2. have a willing team on the other aide to accept what we offer.
We had no attractive expiring contracts to start with nor expendable talent.
Unless you consider any of JSmoove, Al, JJ, Crawford and Teague expendable, there weren’t any tradeable players.
Zaza and Bibby just signed deals, Marvin is BYC, Mo has a player option @2,5 million and the rest are not interesting enough and their contracts are for the minimum salary.
Teams are sheding payroll and the best we could get would a second round pick for any of our end of bench players and that would only happen IF the involved team was reeeeally desperate to take out just 1mill approx from their cap.
Finally, as nire mentioned, we don’t have cap space to accept any contracts.
Is it that difficult to keep this in mind, specially after MC explaining all this already???
One final note: Mike James will be available. I know that he is old, shot happy and over the hill but maybe he could be of some use as a safety net in case we lose anyone from our back court to injury. It seems that CLE are also interested.
Rick Sund
February 19th, 2010
3:29 am
By the way, the Grizzlies traded only a second-round pick for Ronnie Brewer, a 6′7″ former lottery pick G-F who defends well and is efficient offensively. Brewer makes $2.7 million this year and is due a qualifying offer next year, which a team can refuse to exercise if they wish. If the Hawks had traded for him, he would have essentially replaced Mo Evans in the rotation, and would have provided a much needed extra swingman defender off the bench. The fact that the Hawks didn’t make such a deal either tells me that Rick Sund is not creative or that $2.7 million is too much for the ASG to add to the payroll, and neither idea makes me feel very good.
Hmph yes but I was creative enough to get Jamal Crawford. Did you think of that one? Oh ye of such short memory.
Rick Sund
February 19th, 2010
3:30 am
Don’t you people get it? Niremetal is my top employee and he knows what he is tawking about. Shut up your stupid trade and budget ideas and just blog like he says you should.
Suckers.
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
7:49 am
Najeh,
The Jazz were looking to shed payroll in order to get under the luxury tax threshold. They are a playoff-bound team, and would not have dumped off their second best guard for next-to-nothing to Memphis if they wanted to get value in return. That’s also why they dumped off Eric Maynor to ANOTHER team with cap space in exchange for a draft pick they likely will never see. There are more than enough teams that would have offered them a combo forward, backup PG, or another player at a position of need.
They wouldn’t have accepted a package of expiring useless players, because that would not have given them value AND would not have saved them tax money. And they certainly wouldn’t have accepted Mo Evans – that would not have saved them tax money and would bring them only a guy who plays the same position as Brewer but (as you said) is not as good, and who has another year left on his contract to boot.
Rick Sund,
Mock and make fun all you want. If you’re so much of a coward that you can’t use your regular handle to address me, you’re not worth the time.
Kew
February 19th, 2010
8:07 am
Hey everybody, think about it. Most likely he will not sign with Cleveland – and this is why I say that. After the buy out, Cleveland can’t sign him until 30 days, but any other team can sign him right away. If he is bought out within the next few days, he would not be elgible for the playoffs if he signs with Cleveland because of the 30 day wait. I’m pretty sure he wants to be in the playoffs this year. So I think he signs with one of the playoff contenders, like for instance Atlanta or Dallas…plus he knows that he would play more with other teams…hey what do you think?
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
8:13 am
And Najeh,
Maybe there was a move out there that could have improved the team, but it’s entirely possible that there wasn’t. The Magic, Nuggets, Spurs, Lakers, Heat, Suns, Thunder, and Raptors are all seemingly playoff-bound teams that did not make any moves at the deadline (in the case of the Spurs, they did make one move – dumping Theo Ratliff on the Bobcats, who had a trade exception from the Raja Bell trade, but I don’t think you can argue that was a move to improve the team). If there’s always a move to be made, why did elite-level GMs like Buford and Warkentien stand pat?
Answer: Sometimes, there isn’t a move to be made that would improve the team. Sometimes, the only deals out there are ones that would take a team a step back or that would be just as likely to screw the team as improve it (every team has made risky deals that blew up in their face). Sometimes standing still is, in fact, the best thing to do.
Philip(formerly ScoobySnacks)
February 19th, 2010
8:14 am
I 100% guarantee without a shadow of doubt or possible reservation that Z will be back in Cleveland. There is no chance he could possibly end up anywhere else especially the Hawks(period). He loves bron-bron too much.
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
8:16 am
And lastly, the QO to Brewer would not affect the Jazz’s ability to keep Boozer. The Jazz have Bird rights in Boozer, so they can sign him even if they are well over the cap. And cap holds are just that – holds. If you never sign the player, they don’t count against you for payroll or luxury tax purposes. Since the Jazz are well over the cap, all putting the QO on the table would have done is ensure that the Jazz had the right to match offers for Brewer, same as the Hawks can do with Chill.
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
8:33 am
nire,
One trade idea I had was for CDR (2nd round pick from 2 years ago) and Josh Boone from the Nets. Nets have a bunch of SF, and they have Brook Lopez, Tonie Battie at C, and Humphries and Yi listed at PF.
CDR could be our defensive SF off the bench (he is not much of a shooter, but Mo has been missing his corner 3 anyway), and Boone could provide spot minutes at PF and Center.
I dont know if these players would be the answer, but I thought they could be worth a look, and they would give us options, and they’re still young, so maybe Woody could work his magic lol. Mo Evans and a 2nd round pick for Josh Boone and CDR. Would the Nets go for it, I dont know.
I just find it hard to believe that Sund could not have gotten creative enough to find a trading partner so that we could give Woody more options off the bench.
SLAM ONLINE | » Lakers, Celtics Dreading Big Z’s Return to Cleveland
February 19th, 2010
9:01 am
[...] overtures from other teams, everyone assumes that Ilgauskas will be back in Cleveland sometime in March. [...]
vava74
February 19th, 2010
9:03 am
OB,
The same reasons why you covet Boone and CDR can be used by the Nets to keep them.
They are young and appear to be at least “serviceable”. Why would they take a G/F combo who is creeping in to his declining years?
Also, as fas as I understand from nire’s analysis, we have cap issues which prevent us from taking more salary than we are giving away, so, unless you believe that Boone and CDR’s combined wages are only 2,5 million, it seems a no go…
Harry Hawk
February 19th, 2010
9:10 am
We’re just going to end up losing in the second round anyway.
(That’s the way I’ve felt all season. I can’t shake it.)
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
9:12 am
Micheal Cunningham,
At this point, the only chance I see for the Hawks to have a chance to get to the Eastern Conference Finals or to possibly get to the Finals, is to go after Big Z. This is an opportunity that the Hawks can not pass on. I say offer him a 2 year deal and sell him on the fact that this makes the Hawks serious contenders!
With Big Z on the perimeter knocking down J’s, Shaq, DH, and KG would be pulled away from the basket enough to allow Al and Josh to work inside vs. PF instead of centers. I don’t know if Big Z will bite or not, but we have to go after him hard!!! This could be the Hawks chance to steal a legit center for 2 years!!!
Tony
February 19th, 2010
9:36 am
Thanks Mike…It seems like we have Hawks Haters. Who wouldnt want Z here to bang in the middle. Come on Mr. Sund, grab Z ASAP! Go Hawks!
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
9:41 am
Grandad,
We will revisit the Rudy Gay debate in the summer once he sign his new contract.
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
9:49 am
So if Rick Sund thinks that a jump shooting center would beenfit the Hawks, then he needs to make sure that he invites Kevin Pittsnoogle, Mark Blount and about 3-4 Euro centers to camp next summer. The need won’t change and surely Sund can find some low cost options if he truly wants his coach to have an option of running Horford at the 4 with a shooting center in the line-up.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
9:59 am
It’s a wrap. The King has spoken. I will expect Big Z to be back in Cleveland. The puppet commerical must continue to be played…
LeBron: “I’m OK with the trade, I’m not OK with losing Z. I’m OK with the guy that is coming in.” – Brian Windhorst Cavs beat writer
The Truth
February 19th, 2010
10:00 am
Maybe this analogy will shed some light on the Hawks ownership. If you have built this fine house in this elite and exclusive neighborhood, then why would you whine about paying higher property taxes? It should be expected to pay more to live amongst the elite group. It should come with the territory. If you (the owner) don’t want to live amongst the elite and really have a problem with the higher taxes, then maybe you should consider selling your fine house to someone else who is willing to pay the higher taxes. Also, the more you (the owner) are willing to invest into this fine house; the more people will be willing to pay to see it.
fudd21
February 19th, 2010
10:03 am
Najeh, Also with the Jazz being over the cap even though Brewer just made 2.7 million it cost the Jazz 5.4 million. Once you are over the luxry cap the tax is dollar for dollar. Their intentions was to dump salary. Even though the trade worked in the trade machine it wouldn’t have been a realistic trade for the Jazz as it wouldn’t have saved them any money.
Daniel
February 19th, 2010
10:14 am
OK: I know that everything points towards Z returning to Clevland, but I like Atlanta getting in the mix. We actually have more of the MLE to offer Z and there have been some hints (John Hollinger) that Z was not happy to be traded without compensation. He actually said that he expects Z to want the Cavs to resign him and not prorate a 30 day contract. So there may be a little more bad blood than meets the eye, and if nothing else the Hawks involvement forces the Cavs to spend more and maybe even give Z a second year then great. There contract situation will be crippling coming up next two seasons anyway. Just my perspective as a Hawks fan.
Would I love to get Z? Sure Is it likely? no (but not as unlikely as some would seem) The Hawks driving up his price help? Absolutely!!!
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
10:20 am
The Truth, if there are 30 houses in the neighborhood and you have one of the 8 nicest, should you be ashamed? Especially if you are paying about 25% less for your top 8 has vs. the other 7. You may not win the “House of the Year” award, but there are at least 24 other homeowners who wish they had your house (and several of those 24 homeowners pay more for their double-wide than you do for your McMansion). I think it all depends on your perspective.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
10:23 am
Astro,
Thats why I’m glad you are back. I knew The Truth would draw a response from you with his last post. You leave no debate without a remark…
Fundamentals
February 19th, 2010
10:26 am
I’m with most in that Z will go back to Cleveland. Daniel makes a good point in that we have an opportunity to drive their price up. Our contract situation is pretty tight, but we do have an opportunity to keep all our core pieces for several years. Adding 1-2 more key defensive players off waivers would be nice. We’ll see what happens. Glad to see the ASG willing to pursue a 14th player.
Funny how many cull Hawks were delt to new homes. Where are folks ranting about how great AC & Royal were? Seems they can’t find a niche and thus weren’t necessarily “killed” by Woodson. Seems the talent just wasn’t there to begin with.
The name Theo Ratliff still makes me sick. Hopefully he’ll do as much for the Bobcats as he did here to help mess up things.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
10:27 am
I wonder why we didnt see Lebron, Mo Williams and the soul train dances out there clowning after last night game…. Take that Lebron, take that..
Daniel
February 19th, 2010
10:36 am
Get ‘em Melvin!!
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
10:41 am
Melvin, nothing like a good analogy (or a bad one for that matter) . I like Jamison a LOT and dislike the Cavs a LOT. Jamison is a complete class act and has always been the quiet gentleman (even as he was in Vince’s shadow at UNC and eventually in Agent Zero’s shadow in DC). Maybe the Cavs can win it all with Lebron missing the last 3 games (talc gets in his eye and he is forced to miss games) of the Finals and Jamison winning the series MVP. That would make me happy.
The Truth
February 19th, 2010
10:45 am
AJ
The answer to your delightful question is NO, I’m not ashamed. In fact, I’m probably still bragging (to the homies) about the deal I stole. But if I’ve never lived in such luxury before (coming from the hood), I might have over looked the other nuisances of home ownership such as paying property taxes. I hope this is not the plight of the Hawk Ownership but action really does speak much louder than words.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
10:49 am
Fundamentals & Daniel
We can help drive the price for Big Z, but I would rather have a team on the floor that has a legitimate at beating the Cavs on the floor.
For the Hawks fans thinking Big Z is a good pick as the Cavs how much he helped them last year against the Magic?
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
10:49 am
The Truth,
The Hawks management is doing exactly what the Pistons, Heat, Cavs, and Magic did before their respective Finals runs – maintaining a budget within ~$5M of the cap, but not going over. People keep forgetting that – with the exception of the Knicks, Lakers, and Celtics (ie the three teams that have massive revenues even when their teams suck), no team has gone into the luxury tax until AFTER they made a run to at least the conference finals. For all of Cuban’s flamboyance, the Mavs didn’t pay the tax in ‘02-03 (though the tax system was different back then). The Pistons didn’t in ‘03-’04. The Heat didn’t in ‘05-’06. The Cavs didn’t in ‘06-’07. The Magic didn’t in ‘08-09. The Blazers didn’t pay the luxury tax between 2004 (the end of the ‘Sheed era) and last year, and only paid it last year because of the Darius Miles fiasco (remember how their President threatened to sue any team that signed Darius Miles, since Miles playing would mean that his contract would be re-activated, putting the Blazers into the tax?). This year, the Blazers aren’t paying the tax – on the contrary, the Hawks’ payroll is ~$8M more than the Blazers’.
Does that “shed some light” on why your analogy is a load of crap? None of our neighbors paid the higher taxes either until they got an unexpected promotion to Senior Vice President and a corresponding raise.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
10:57 am
Daniel, Traceman, Astro, & a few others
I really enjoyed all the chatter about attedance and some of the other stuff you guys were talking about the other day. Very good stuff.
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
10:58 am
The owners of the Hawks and other NBA teams are all very, very rich men. But you don’t stay rich for long if you spend money you don’t have. Like the Mavs, Pistons, Heat, Cavs, Magic, and all other non-Lakers/Knicks/Celts teams since the luxury tax era began (yes, even the Blazers, the team with the richest owner in the NBA), the Hawks will have to make an unexpectedly deep playoff run before they can afford to go into luxury tax territory.
If the Hawks are “cheap,” then 27 of 30 NBA owners are cheap.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
10:59 am
niremetal
Nice comeback!
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
11:08 am
Daniel
I said before, you shut the Cavs up by beating them.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
11:11 am
GeeMack,
In order to beat the Cavs you have to beat the Refs first….
The Truth
February 19th, 2010
11:15 am
niremetal
If my analogy smells like crap to you, then your Google recalls smell even worst. Your volume of information said very little and is really pointless. This statement: “None of our neighbors paid the higher taxes either until they got an unexpected promotion to Senior Vice President and a corresponding raise.” is a good example. In this section of the neighborhood I am referring to, THESE PEOPLE DON’T WORK, THEY ARE ALL MILLIONAIRES!!
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
11:22 am
Hawks fans
I’m glad the trading deadline has passed. I like the defensive intensity I saw the Hawks play with against the Clippers.
If we play defense the way we could I can see get out of the 2nd round if we play Bos, or Orlando.
However with the changes the Cavs made (Jamison) they’ve put themselves in the class with the Lakers.
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
11:26 am
Guys,
Say what you want, but the Hawks have a much better chance against the Cavs with Big Z against Shaq while Horford/Josh work against Varejao/Jamison. Remember that Shaq has to stretch his defense to guard Big Z. That opens up the lane. Can we beat them with Big Z? I don’t know. But I sure think we have a better shot with him than without!!!
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
11:27 am
Melvin,
Nahhhh…the Cavs just have a better team at this time.
ntrigue
February 19th, 2010
11:29 am
I say we go after T-Mac when the Knicks cut him. That would help our bench out so much him and Jamal leading the second unit would be awesome! I dont know if were able 2 add two players but if we could get him and Z we would be in a real good position but this is wishful thinking probaly will not happen.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
11:29 am
Hoops
I wonder why Big Z didn’t help the Cavs against the Magic last year?
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
11:29 am
The Truth, I think we will find out this summer. I, too, have my doubts. nire has consistently provided evidence of how the ASG’s funding has been fairly consistent with like teams. And he has also suggested that at some point, many of the owners “stepped out on faith” and wrote that next big check. My guess is we will learn if the ASG will do that this summer. More than likely, we will find out in these upcoming playoffs how far this particular core can go. Hopefully, they will bring back Joe AND figure out a way to upgrade their bench. And if they choose to upgrade the coach, obviously that should happen this summer too. I’ll beat on the ASG if they don’t pursue a bought out vet in the next few weeks, but I truly have no issues about sitting out the trade deadline. This summer, we’ll find out if they are ready to finally finish the basement and upgrade the kitchen cabinets.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
11:30 am
ntrigue
Very wishful!
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
11:40 am
GeeMack,
I don’t know. You’ll have to ask Z. You have to knock down shots when you get them. I just think that Al & Josh playing PF will get the benefit of drawing their 5 man out.
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
11:41 am
@ vava,
Now that the deadline is gone, I know this discussion is not beneficial. But lend me your ear.
The rumors were that CDR was unhappy about losing his spot in the starting lineup to Jarvis Hayes. And the Nets actually have 5 SF listed on their roster, so I think they would be willing to part with CDR for the right price.
Would he be a fit here? I dont know, because he’s a horrible 3pt shooter, and he has had issues in NJ. But its hard not to have issues when your team is 5-49 (or whatever they are). And it might appear to be issues on the outside, but who knows what the real story is (supposedly, Josh Smith has issues with coaching).
Cap would be a problem though. Maybe Mo, RandMo and a 2nd for Boone and CDR.
Daniel,
Although we have more to offer Big Z, I dont see BASG offering him more than anybody else. And I’d be surprised if Cleveland is concerned about the cost to bring him back. If LbJ wants him back, they will do whatever it takes to get them back.
I was glad to see the Cavs go down last night, especially in front of their fans. Melo is a beast. Didn’t he lead his team to an NCAA championship his only college season? Wasn’t our SF part of an NCAA championship team his only college season (even scoring the winning bucket)? Yeah, I know thats where the comparisons end lol.
If I’m Marvin, I’m watching tape of the elite SF every day, because that should help fuel his drive to step his game up more consistently.
jerrywest
February 19th, 2010
11:50 am
MC –
Hawks haven’t used MLE yet.
terrell
February 19th, 2010
11:57 am
The ONLY way he comes to Atlanta is if we offer him a lot of $. We’re talking bout the ASG people. Aint happening. New blog please.
The Truth
February 19th, 2010
12:00 pm
AJ
Agreed the summer will be an interesting show and tell. But also the current drama movie the Hawks are staring in entitled “A Race For The Title” is not too shabby either.
Ken Strickland
February 19th, 2010
12:01 pm
KEVINA-can’t argue with logic. We’ve got to get more production out of the PG position without relying so much on Crawford to play the position. Both Crawford and JJ are far more dangerous playing off the ball than pounding it ourside running ISO’s. Have you noticed how Teague always brings the ball up and initiates the OFF when he’s in the gm? Have you also noticed how Bibby will often let JJ or Jamaal bring the ball up and initate the OFF, which usually means they intend to initiate ISO Joe or Jamaal. I’M STILL LOOKING FOR ALL OF THE LEADERSHIP BIBBY IS SUPPOSED TO BE PROVIDING.
GRANDAD-Pressure on the ball is always the key to good DEF. To me, instead of relying on his beloved switching DEF to mask Bibby poor DEF, Woodson should involve him in halfcourt traps and force the ball out of the hands of the PG he’s normally unable to guard. The PG’s teammates would be forced to come out of their OFF sets to provide a passing outlet for the trapped PG. It would increase the potential for steals and deflections, as well as limiting OFF options by forcing them to take additional time off the 24sec clock to reset their OFF.
It would also be a good idea to frequently fall back into a zone
DEF following a good trap. We’ve got to make teams think and adjust to what we’re doing defensively on a constant basis. We also need to shorten the 24sec clock and take as much pressure off our frontline as possible. The best way to do that is to run traps, pressure the ball in the frontcourt and try to keep it there as long as possible.
We need to do as many things as possible on both OFF and DEF to take advantage of our superior speed, quickness and athleticism. Any team that can run with us can’t match our size and athleticism, and any team the can match our size and athleticism can’t match our speed and quickness. If we’re going to go anywhere in the playoffs, Woodson has go to get more involved in coaching this team througout the gm, not just at halftime, or before and after the gm. He’s got to get past his rigid, inflexible approach to coaching and dealing with players and employ more imagination, strategy, adjustments and use of his bench.
jerrywest
February 19th, 2010
12:06 pm
Ilgauskas found it hard to watch Cleveland play the Nuggets on television from home on Thursday evening.
“This is my team,” he said. “I’m going to be mad, but not so mad that I wouldn’t come back. I understand it’s a business. This is my home. No matter what happens in the future, that will never change.”
Read more: http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/64880/20100219/ilgauskas_hopes_wizards_let_him_go_home/#ixzz0g0BtDgei
Daniel
February 19th, 2010
12:11 pm
Man
The blog is going good today. Lots of reasonable posts, some good, friendly debate. I missed this the last few days. Gee- I think of Z as a nice to decent addition to the Hawks, but he would be SORELY missed from the Cavs. Can you imagine Shaq having to play 35+ a night during the playoffs? Shoot if he goes to Denver or Dallas I would be almost as happy as him coming here. I just want the Cavs to not have everything just fall there way. I think they got lucky to get Jaimson instead of Amare. Older yes. Better teammate, better fit, good guy. I wish we had him.
Daniel
February 19th, 2010
12:12 pm
I meant “their way”
vava74
February 19th, 2010
12:14 pm
Ken,
I am with you. However, you cannot disregard that the switching defense is also an asset, the problem is, as you say, we seldom vary from that making us sitting ducks to the better coached teams.
The pre-game talks of the opposing coaches – when they are good – is simple:
1. Let’s set screens, make them switch so we can end with either a big on Bibby or a PG/Quick player against a slower opponent in the perimeter.
alternatively,
2. Let’s set screens, make them switch and then rotate the ball until we the Hawks are left with a big guy deep in the paint but with the defensive assignment of our 3 point shooter (who will comfortably drill the trey).
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
12:19 pm
AJ,
I am looking forward to the summer as well. First and foremost, because we need to get JJ resigned. But with about 6 teams having major cap space, I am looking forward to see who (if anybody) changes teams.
Ken, vava,
And thats one concern about the Hawks on defense. We have only 1 philosohy, with very little adjustment. Switch everything everytime every game, and double Dwight Howard. To be fair though, once in a blue moon Woody change it up and goes zone.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
12:23 pm
Ken Strickland,
If I didn’t know any better I would swear you were one of my very good friends. He makes some of the same statements regarding the Hawks coaching staff.
Although he and I never see eye to eye on the Hawks coaching, dude knows his stuff.
I like some of the suggestions you made about switching up the defense. Good stuff. I think defense is where we could really make up alot of ground against teams that are bigger than us inside.
Daniel
February 19th, 2010
12:39 pm
To the point about the defensive coaching philosophy, I actually think the switching defense overall plays to our strength as a team, our bigs are undersized but more athletic. I would change a couple of stratedgies against Clevland and Orlando. Against the Magic, I would NOT double Howard, make him work, but let him get his, and on the offensive end get him involved in as many pick and rolls as possible. With Clevland, I would double Lebron ONLY off of their guards and keep in on Shaq or Hickson.
Finally, to stir up a little controversy here. Gee, Ken you guys are talking about good coaching. Do you guys really think Mike Brown and Stan Van Gundy are better coaches than Woodson? I am not saying Woody is better than those guys, but I don’t think he is worse. Ken, try to not say that Woodson is the worst of those three, I dare you.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
1:03 pm
Jamison.
will have a harder time learning the handshakes than the team plays. Think he will buy into the foolish antics? As an All-Star vet – he might be embarrassed.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
1:23 pm
Daniel
Against the Magic, I would NOT double Howard, make him work, but let him get his
I agree with the no double. We went that direction with Collins last game and then quit. We should have fouled out Collins and then let Rando do his thing.
At some point I would like to see Josh front Howard and have Al ready to help. Josh could make it hard for Howard to get the ball.
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
1:38 pm
Fronting is actually not a good strategy against Howard. Jameer salivates whenever teams do that because he knows he can throw it both over the golding defender and high enough that no one else can get it. Josh can jump high, but he can’t get as much lift when he’s jockeying for position with Howard, and a good PG can easily arc it over him.
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
2:03 pm
I also dont like the fronting, because if the ball gets lobbed over, we will be trying to recover, and the Magic do a good job of ball movement (against us), which keeps us scrambling.
Still, just about every blogger (and ‘Nique) think that we should play Howard straight up, but Woody insists on doubling him (sometimes the double comes quick, and sometimes it comes late).
So what does Woody see that we dont see?
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
2:05 pm
Melvin:
I think in my original statement I said something along the line of;
“I don’t want to get anything started”.
Your point is well taken, someone will give him his money.
He is a good player. He just cannot shoot. He is ‘NOT’ a franchise player. Neither is Marv. However, I’m of the belief that Marv is a better player than he shows here. If/when Marv leaves, I think we will regret it and realize that perhaps Wdsn underutilized his skill set.
Personally – I think Marv is a high post [4].
I respect your opinions on this board. It’s just amazing to me how
similar Marv and Rudy are both physically and stat wise.
[pts. notwithstanding] Rudy would not be a good fit here as we already have Josh who can’t shoot. See…I love Josh…and he can’t shoot.
Seriously, have a great day, Melvin!!!
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
2:25 pm
Daniel
It’s probably 7 or 8 coaches in the league that are clearly better coaches than Woody, and those 2 are not in the discussion.
If you give Woody the teams those guys have, you’ll get the same results.
IMO coaching is not the biggest problem with the Hawks…it’s personnel.
Some of the suggestion Ken Strickland made makes alot of sense ( Half court pressure, PG double teams, occassional zones, along with the switching defense) this will keep the offenses guessing.
keeping it Real
February 19th, 2010
2:36 pm
hawks need a good big man to win past second round
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
2:42 pm
Grandad,
Make sure when you watch the games you put on your glasses. If you really think that Marvin and Rudy Gay are the same, then you do need to get your eyes checked. Think about it this way, if you put Marvin on the Grizzlies, and put Rudy on the Hawks, the Hawks would be much better, and the Grizzlies would be much worse. If Rudy Gay was guarded by much smaller guys(6′4 and 6′5) like Marvin is, he would take advantage of it. If Rudy was left wide open like Marvin is he would be able to shoot a higher percentage than Marvin does. All your points about stats are irrelevant because Rudy draws the other teams best defender, or a double team, and teams don’t even worry about Marvin. Watching the game last nite Doug Collins explained that in the playoffs, if you have a guy on the floor who is not an offensive threat, teams won’t guard him. That is Marvin. I look at Rudy as a younger version of Joe Johnson with a little more explosion. Joe is a better shooter. Rudy is an eagle and Marvin is a duck. After watching at home with Marvin Williams before the Clippers game, I realize that Marvin’s dad and his cousin are probably on here defending him all the time. After reading thru these post I realize that TRACEMAN is his father, KEVIN A is his cousin and you might be his GRANDAD. TRACEMAN with all this nonsense about his PER average is very funny. If you have any knowledge of the game, and you watch what you see and not what you believe, you realize that he is just not a good player. He is serviceable at best. Almost any other 3 in the league could come to Atlanta, and give us what Marvin does. He gets less shots because he can not hit the ones he gets. He is the only player on the Hawks besides maybe Bibby, who gets WIDE OPEN looks. He can’t dribble, he can’t finish, he gets his shots blocked by players much smaller than him, he is a a jump shooter who can’t hit wide open jump shots. He can’t defend 3’s and you think he is a 4. So you think he could check the Garnett’s, Boozer’s, Bosh’s, and Dirk’s of the world. Come on GRANDAD, wake up or stop taking that medicine that makes you hallucinate.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
2:52 pm
keeping it Real
You will be hard pressed to fide one.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
2:55 pm
Grandad,
I too believe that Marvin is more of a PF than SF but this team already have the PF’s spot well covered. However, other than height, thats the only similiar attribute that Rudy and Marvin share. Rudy is a better ball handler, creater, finisher and passer than Marvin and his defense is very underrated. Keep in mind, that most of Rudy shots are contested where as Marvin is generally open for those baseline and corner 3 shots. Also, I respect your views. You made a good reference to their stats but let me add that stats doesn’t tell the whole story. Thats why I said his contract this summer, will be an indicatin on how their(Griz) and other GMs consider what he brings to the court. I’m not calling Rudy a superstar but he’s a borderline all-star out west only b/c he’s competing against Melo and Durant at the SF spots.
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
2:55 pm
Ken Strickland:
Agreed…agreed…and agreed.
We tend to agree on all things Wdsn.
Lack of creativity and or innovation, more so on offense than ‘D’.
My previous post to Melvin, I mentioned that I thought Marv would make a terrific high post [4]. Wdsn most likely has never thought about
“what can ‘I’ do to help Marv improve”?
Thinking outside the box, ha…Wdsn is so banal,If he ran a box and 1,
He’d put the 1 in the box.
You are absolutely correct my friend, why not use our speed and athleticism as an asset. Both on ‘O’ and ‘D’.
And don’t even get me started on young Teaguer!!!
You got me to thinking – all these trade scenarios:
We’ve got assets, lets quit worrying about what we don’t have!
Think about it. How many teams would love to have 4 all-star caliber
players?
To quote Mark Richt/Erk Russell/Todd Grantham: “GATA”
The First Track of Rod's Mind
February 19th, 2010
3:02 pm
MARVIN SUCKS
The Second Track of Rod's Mind
February 19th, 2010
3:03 pm
404 error: DOES NOT EXIST
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
3:11 pm
Melvin:
Under the circumstances [Wdsn], unfortunately, Marv has more value to us as a trade chip (next summer) than as a player.
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
3:25 pm
@ GeeMack,
“IMO coaching is not the biggest problem with the Hawks…it’s personnel”
I wont say that personnel is not an issue. But we’re stuck with the personnel we have (for the time being). Therefore, it is up to the coach to make the most of the personnel that we have, and figure out ways to play to their strengths.
For example, playing zone sometimes, knowing who (and when) to double-team, knowing when to play inside-out, knowing when to apply a full court press, knowing the right play to call (instead of ISOs)etc.
Our personnel probably wont change for the rest of the season, but our coaching strategies and adjustments can change on a game to game basis.
Grandad,
If your opinion is that for the price that it will take to get Gay, Marvin will give you a better value (due to salary), then I can see where you might be coming from with that.
But to say Marvin can give you close to what Rudy gives you, you’re in the minority on that one. Other teams gear up to stop Rudy, while Hawks opponents dont ever go into a game thinking “watch out for Marvin”.
And Rod from CP says it best. Switch places, and put Marvin on the Grizzlies right now, and see how that team performs. And put Gay on the Hawks right now and see how we perform.
I dont think there is any comparison.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
3:30 pm
Grandad,
You may be right… This summer will be interesting in Hawksland. JJ pending FA. Will this be the summer we finally resolve Chills situation. Are we going to make any moves to bring in new personnel. And are we going to resign Woody? Yep, Hawks have some critical decisions to make.
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
3:36 pm
One other thing, most people on this blog have some basketball knowledge. Please stop with this the Hawks are athletic crap. The only guy in our starting lineup who is athletic is Josh Smith. Bibby is not, Joe is crafty but not athletic, Marvin is clumsy not athletic, Horford plays with energy he is really not that athletic. His post moves are very robotic. Jamal is just a crafty veteran. Teague, Mario, and Evans are athletic, but thats it. We are not any more athletic than the Lakers, Cleveland, Memphis, Orlando, Ok. City, Chicago, Charlotte…….
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
3:46 pm
Rudy Gay is clearly a better scorer than Marvin. He has a #1/2 scorer’s mentality and has been groomed to think that his contribution to his team’s success will mostly come by scoring. If memory serves me correctly, he grabbed less than 3 boards in the most recent game against the Hawks. He, like many other young SFs, is still learning how to consistently rebound the ball. I can’t speak to his defense, he blocks shots but that’s not an indicator of defensive skill. He will clearly make more money than Marvin because scoring is highly valued in this league.
Marvin came into the league on a team that featured veteran offensive players like Harrington and Joe. He also deferred to guys like Chill and Josh. He never left the arena thinking “I have to score for this team to be successful”. I’ve said ad nauseum that he must improve converting the few shot attempts he gets each night. Lately, he has been doing better on the boards and his defense is picking up again.
But just like Ronnie Brewer and Kevin Martin are asked to do different things for their teams, so are Marvin and Rudy.
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
4:03 pm
Rod, I don’t think that athletic and clumsey are opposites. When I hear the term “athletic” used in basketball, I think about playing above the rim. Ray Allen is not athletic but he is very graceful. Marvin is not graceful but he does have above average leaping ability (no, not like Josh but let’s not sit here and act like he has a 20″ vertical). At the same time, I agree with your base assessment, the Hawks are not incredibly athletic. I think they were when Chill was here and added another “high flyer”.
Daniel
February 19th, 2010
4:13 pm
Rod- I totally disagree with your assessment that the Hawks are not athletic, particularly the front court. We agree on Josh, Al is very athletic, balance, power and speed. Have you seen the way he brings the ball up the court? ZaZa is athletic for a 7 footer, and I know it won’t matter what I say about Marvin but he is athletic.
GeeMack
February 19th, 2010
4:14 pm
O’Brien
I think we can be alot better on several fronts.
I also think Woody is doing good job with what he has. Can it better? Sure.
Currently we are fighting teams like (Bos, Orl, & Cle)for playoff position, and those teams all have 4 or more current or former all stars players.
Those players are all playing at a very respectable level, with the exception of Rasheed.
You are correct we need employ some different strategies during the process of games, however if we did all the things you suggest it would only yeild 2 or 3 more wins.
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
4:16 pm
R.f.C.P.
Just to get this straight:
I an no relation to Marv.
Although, I would be proud if he were my grandson!
Also, I have sat on the court at more basketball games (well over 1000)than you will ever watch on TV.
So, Marv on the Griz, makes them worse, so then, they would not make the play-offs and have a losing record?
Lets see:
Currently Mem. = 1 game Above .500, 11th in West, -1 pt dif., hmmmmm.
Now Mem. has improved over last yr. = [Zach Randolph] I agree.
As stated above…we don’t need another slasher/finisher in the lineup
here as we already have Josh. I much prefer Josh. Where would you put Rudy in our lineup (already undersized). Once again I prefer Josh.
Rudy can’t shoot! You say Rudy draws the other teams best defender,
or gets doubled; what about Zach and Mayo – chopped liver?
I agree he is smoother than Marv and finishes stronger. conceded.
Another point, you mentioned my statement about Marv as a high post [4]
and noted that he couldn’t guard KG, etc. Where a player lines up on offense has not one thing to do with who he guards on ‘D’. Your point is moot. Not to mention all the switching we do anyway.
Now! You are so blinded by your prejudice against Marv that you will not open your mind and see any quality this young man has that may or may not be outstanding.
Sir, my experience, (in basketball) qualifies me to make certain analysis’. Please accept this as truth.
I’m not attacking you, but I am qualified to make assessments on
players skill and their relative value.
Marvin is a good kid!
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
4:27 pm
AJ,
Agreed on Marvin. In college, his role was 6th man, and now on the Hawks, he is the 6th option. And if he is able to improve his rebounding, his defense, and knock down the open jumper with consistency, then his contract will be of great value.
I would like to see Marvin slow down Grant Hill later (Hill had a really good game last time). And I wonder if Stoudemire will be out to prove a point (He had 36 pts and 14 rebs against the Mavs Wednesday night).
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
4:29 pm
O’Brien:
What would Rudy’s nimbers be here; with the 3 J’s and Al?
For the money…his nimbers would not be enough to justify the expenditure.
Marv is a proven:
*Great teammate = chemistry
*Above avg. defender (perhaps even Good on ball defender)
*Better shooter *** No Question (Marv having off yr.,everybody has one)
*Good contract (already in place)
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
4:31 pm
Astro Joe,
While some of your points are valid others are not. Rudy Gay averages more rebounds per game this year than Marvin does, so the 3 against us is irrelevant. More than likely rebounding on his team is not something that is really required of him with Zach (12 rpg) in the paint. Marvin defers because he can’t get his own shot. When he signed the contract this summer both Sund and Woodson stated that they expected a lot of improvement in his game. There has been no improvement just regression in his game. What games are you watching where is defense is picking up? We have been outplayed at the point and the 3 in almost every game we have played recently. Did he defend Rasual Butler? I don’t remember anybody playing defense against Miami, don’t remember him doing anything special against Memphis, nothing against the Bulls. what games are you watching? Marvin’s role as I understood it going into this year was to improve his offense (fail), hit the wide open 3 (fail), defend his position, and defend the best offensive wing player so Joe does not have to (fail), help rebound(not a fail, but not a pass either), become one of our better players on the team (total fail). They should have also told him to work on his balance and footwork, which is terrible. He received the type of money he recv’d this offseason because of his potential to improve. He was paid more than Ariza, Matt Barnes, and Artest. He has failed miserably.
HawksFan11
February 19th, 2010
4:49 pm
Daniel
I was with you until you wrote “ZaZa is athletic for a 7 footer”. Zaza is about as athelitic as Master P was graceful on Dancing with the Stars.
Melvin
February 19th, 2010
4:51 pm
Grandad,
I disagree that this team couldn’t use another slasher. Matter of fact that’s what this team is lacking (see JChills). Lately I have seen Marvin slashing to the paint off the ball for easy baskets and rebounds. Smoove rarely slash to the baskets during offensive sets other than pick n rolls and alley play from Bibby. I would like to see Smoove slash more because he has the athleticism to finish at the rim versus standing on the perimeter. If this team had Rudy, he would be a great compliment to Joe in the starting line up b/c he can create his own shot and score 18-20 pts (similiar to Jamal). Remember Sund acquire Jamal b/c we need another scorer. If Marvin could produce that type of scoring consistently than it would be no need for Jamal, right?
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
4:58 pm
Grandad,
While you are a little older than me, I would still challenge you as to how many sporting events basketball related that you have been to. I have had season tickets to the Hawks for 6 years now, have had season tickets to another pro sports team when I lived there, plus had season tickets to the Hawks (All pretty good seats also) growing up in Atlanta. Along with playing against some of the many guys we sit up and argue about all day, plus knowing a lot of the players personally because of my job (entertainent), I do feel like I am just as qualified to speak as you. I have had conversations with guys in the league and trust me Marvin is only highly regarded as a basketball player in Atlanta on this blog. Notice no other team made any offer to him in the offseason. On your points, Marvin being a great teamate means nothing. Rasheed Wallace was a great teamate to his team. So was Dennis Rodman. Marvin by no means is an above average defender. I don’t think that Marvin is a better shooter. Marvin can’t shoot with a hand in his face, Rudy can. If you actually think that if Rudy Gay was on the Hawks, he would average 10ppg, then you are crazy. He would probably be our 2nd or 3rd best player. If you show your teammates that you can play, they will pass it to you when you are open. Him being a good kid or giving to the salvation army, or being the double dutch champion in Seattle means nothing. I would rather have a malcontent like Stephen Jackson, who the other team has to prepare for than a nice guy like Marvin on my team. So if he could not guard the 4’s I named and you say that would not matter, would ne be able to score on them? He can’t score on guys 5 inches shorter than him. Your constant support of this guy and absurb statements concerning him really lead me to believe that you are related to him.
The Truth
February 19th, 2010
5:01 pm
HawksFan11
That’s a good one about Zaza, really cracked me up!! I was wondering who was going to say it first.
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
5:01 pm
Rod, I have said ad naseum that his performance is down this year. His shooting percentage should improve as well as his rebounding. But no one should expect his scoring average to improve unless they are willing to say exactly which player will be shooting less and passing more. What frustrates me is the belief that on a team with 6 players averaging 24+ minutes, that someone will NOT be the 5th (or 6th) scoring option. I’m fairly certain that there is a 5th/6th scoring option on each and every team. Again, yes, his shooting percentage needs to improve to last season’s form… but unless the thought is that he needs to take shots away from Jamal, Joe, Al or Josh… I have no idea how anyone could expect him to suddenly put up points comparable to a 1-3 scoring option-type player.
And I’m guessing that the rebound rate per minute is pretty even between Marvin and Gay.
richbrave
February 19th, 2010
5:09 pm
richbrave
February 19th, 2010
5:07 pm
First DREW GOODEN refused the trade, now IlGAUSKAS. Meanwhile, MIKE JAMES wants to be bought out so he can get a head start on next season. I say f*** ‘um. Let the cancer fester on the bench. They’re both going to be expiring at the end of the season anyway. Besides, the WIZ have plenty of cancer to go around already. A little more won’t hurt anything.
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
5:41 pm
Astro Joe,
Here we go round in circles again. answer this question for me. Why would Joe, Josh, Bibby, Jamal or Horford pass more to a guy who has proved he can’t deliver? Why would Woodson design plays for a guy who proved he can’t score? That’s the point. He had every opportunity to prove he could become higher in the pecking order and he failed. He was above Al in the pecking order last year. Jamal was not here. He should be moving up in the pecking order not down. I know you will say it does not matter, but out of all of our best players, not Joe Smith, he is the highest drafted player. Why is he going backwards?
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
5:50 pm
Rod, because sometimes, guys are drafted in the wrong position. And then a good GM corrects that mistake by offering a contract that is more indicative of the most recent evaluation. So Josh gets %58M and Marvin gets $37M… based on the most recent evaluation. Isn’t that your understanding of how things work, or do you think that Bibby is still viewed as a former #2 overall pick these many years later?
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
5:56 pm
From ajc.com,
“Atlanta Spirit co-owner Steve Belkin has until next Thursday to pay $2 million or else he risks losing his stake in the partnership, Montgomery County Circuit Court documents say.”
I can’t wait for the ownership situation to be resolved.
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
5:59 pm
O’Brien,
That 2M could be the extra money that’s needed to attract Big Z!!!
Ramon
February 19th, 2010
6:05 pm
I wish Michael Jordan’s ownership team would come bid on the Hawks.
ILL-logical
February 19th, 2010
6:21 pm
The discussions regarding who is a better player/ a better fit between Marvin and Rudy Gay has raised some interesting points however, allow me to take a slightly different angle on the matter:
1. If the Hawks go after Rudy Gay-and I am on record as saying they should- it will be to replace Joe; Marvin would be part of the price paid in either free agency or S/T.Rudy is not as good as Joe today but in 2 years and the right offensive system , he will be as good as Joe is today.
2.Most if not all of the discussions on this blog regarding players and their performance ASSUME Woodson’s “system” as a basis for evaluation. for instance, in the above discussion concerning Marvin vaersus Rudy, the comparison is based on what attributes the 3 posistion must posses in the current scheme of things.ie 3 point shooting. Well a close look at Denver’s bench last evening would have revealed a Hall of Fame small forward who had no 3 point shot making ability , worked almost exclusively in the low postand was actually 6′41/2″ tall. Adrian Dantly played on teams as diverse as the Lakers and the Pistons but averaged over 20 ppg over his Hall of Fame career.
If the Hawks ever get a coach who creates an offense based upon the skill sets of the players, who knows what might happen?
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
6:21 pm
Rod from College Park
We will find out how good of a bargain Gay is when he gets his first big contract. But if you want to talk bargain lets talk Carl Landry. He is younger, a better rebounder, shoots a better FG% and cheaper. The kid is a stud. I would love to have him as a Hawk over Marvin or Gay. Next year at this time we can judge Marvin better considering his age and the back injury he went through. His contract this year precludes a trade as you well know. Besides if you go far enough back into the posts you would find I liked Chills as a better fit although I wanted to keep both. We got Jamal instead. Which worked out better than I had ever imagined.
There is much debate as to how we can improve the team. You choose Marvin as your huckleberry and others choose getting a more traditional big. My personal huckleberry is a better PG. I like many, thought Bibby would have a better year. West was a waste. Multiple 10 day contracts with D League PG’s should have resulted in a better result. The fact is, Sund chose not to make any more moves and I do not see any more coming till summer.
I was not defending Marvin as much as I was pointing our he has shot much better the last 20 games. As Astro said, volume is not as important when Marvin is the 5th option. If we have an injury this may change and we will see if Marvin will step up. Until then he just needs to defend. As hot and as good as JJ and Jamal have shot, I still want more touches for Al and Josh. The better the balance the better chance we have to win if someone is cold or god forbid injury.
The Truth
February 19th, 2010
6:21 pm
On the subject of Marvin, at least this year, he seems to be struggling with a number of issues, some common and some perhaps uncommon:
The acquisition of Crawford and less playing minutes have affected his game (This is happening at a time when he is still defining his game)
The acquisition of Crawford and the shifting of roles have also affected his game
The signing of his new contract seem to be effecting his game
The development of his game with respect to his age still seem to be a work in progress
He still doesn’t fully know the extent to what he can do (and not do) in the heat of battle
His court decisions (for example) to read defenses and attack or pass is still a work in progress (Often times he tries to be the hero without the full understanding of his limitations; some of his current moves just isn’t working right now especially in the paint)
I’m sure some (if not all) of these issues will be worked out in time. For example, JJ has floaters working for him this year I had not previously seen. If the Hawks was where the Nets are now, we could all sit back and watch Marvin develop stress-free. But with the emerging possibility of a deep playoff run for the Hawks, there are some fans that do not have the patience to wait on the possibilities of Marvin’s full potential. They want a complete polish team now. Also, we as fans need to understand that Marvin’s role is emerging to be the “The Utility Guy” instead of a “Go to Guy”. A less glamorous role but very necessary for team success (a dirty job but somebody got to do-it kind of player). This could be a Woody design. If Woody did not design this, then this is the affects from his current challenges. But, the idea that he is getting paid 7.5M is the reason we are having this kind of conversation.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
6:41 pm
Rod from College Park
Why would Joe, Josh, Bibby, Jamal or Horford pass more to a guy who has proved he can’t deliver?
For one thing he has a better career FG% than JJ or Jamal. Since his back injury he has struggled but the last 20 games his shooting % is back to normal. I am not sure how you can put Bibby in a group who cannot pass to Marvin because he cannot finish when clearly he finishes better than Bibby. The other guys? Sure I give you that. They are having career years and are playing at a higher level. I would have no problem running Marvin more plays at the expense of option 6 on down. In fact I would encourage it in the remainder of the season. We need Marvin cooking for the playoffs.
F.I.L.A
February 19th, 2010
6:55 pm
Rod from College Park…..Get off marvin williams nuts man..Thats all you do is talk about marvin..Lol what type of man are you sir?
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
6:58 pm
Kevin A,
Don’t hold you breath waiting on Marvin to cook. His playoff averages are much worse.
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
7:02 pm
Kevin A,
I actually agree that the point is a problem, but I have some track record to believe that Bibby will break out of his slump. His defense is terrible, but when we need a big shot I am confortable with him taking the shot because he has proved that he can hit a big shot during his career. I would not want Marvin taking a big shot at Welcome All Park.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
7:06 pm
To be honest I want to see Dallas beat Orlando much more than our roster. Our roster is set.
Blazers over Boston? – a stretch but could happen.
Last game against the guards had problems but Josh and Al went off. I think we will need our guards tonight.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
7:13 pm
Rod from College Park
I dont know if you normalyl read my posts. I gripe about Bibby but if he got on a hot streak, that would be awesome. To be honest I have more faith in Bibby,ZaZa and Marvin playing at a higher level than Teague, Joe Smith, Evans, Collins, Mario and Rando. To go more than 7 deep one of these guys need a break through.
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
7:35 pm
Ok guys, lets talk about the Suns while we wait for the game blog.
The Hawks did a decent job on Nash last time (points wise), although he had a bunch of assists. What do we expect tonight?
Will Teague get some PT when Phoenix play their backup PG?
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
8:02 pm
One more point on Marvin and the addition of Jamal, Marvin knew about Jamal from their Washington State connection. As I understand it, Jamal was something of a high school legend in that area. So Marvin doesn’t view Jamal in the same manner that someone like Al (who I think grew up in Detroit) would think of Jamal.
Marvin is a below average salaried SF who gets the 5th most shots on his Eastern Conference contending team this year (and was likely no higher than 4th in other seasons). At some point, being unable to separate his draft selection 5 years ago from his current status as a below average salaried SF must be considered a short-coming by the person who is incapable of “getting over it already”. There is nothing in Marvin’s demeanor that suggests that he is prideful, egotistical, self-centered or boostful. In other words, he ain’t walking around like a #2 pick entitled to some type of special treatment from teammates, opposing players or referees. If his ultimate sin was accepting BK’s decision to select him #2, then I think he paid his penance when he accepted that less than average salary last summer.
East Point
February 19th, 2010
8:04 pm
Marvin could do what Gay does if he is giving the shots.he can drive and he can shoot..he is the total package but he is only the 4 option..at best..Do u people watch the game…Marvin only takes 8 or 9 shots a game…he plays his role and is never out of control….we are a guard oriented team…Marvin is not the problem….josh and Al need more shots anyway
rod,
I never hear u talk bad about Joe…But u can clearly see when he gets the ball the offense usually stop moving…Big games he doesnt show up…some team will regret paying him max money….we also have a very small frontcourt with Al at 6ft8 and josh smith maybe 6ft7 and im streching it..we have big men but your coach refuses to use his talent…..
oh yeah Has Marvin had a doggy style session with your girl ?
Blast
February 19th, 2010
8:17 pm
Would be nice if Dallas beat Orlando tonight, and hope Boston falls to Portland. Boston was VERY lucky to escape from LA with a one point win without Kobe.
Oh, yes. And no dancing for Cleveland last night!
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
8:31 pm
Let’s put it this way, If Nash was our PG JJ and Jamal would be pissed. he controls the offense. Al, Marvin and Josh would be happy. He has the skill to feed the ball to who ever he wants. At the same time all of our career highs by all of the players would probally go up in efficiency. If we were the Lakers money we could trade Bibby and lick our lips.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
8:36 pm
Blast
A win tonight and a Orlando loss would be great. Boston losing to the Blazers is a stretch without Roy but we can only hope.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
8:38 pm
MC
Is it possible to have a game thread one hr before game time?
I like the way you post information while leaving the chat alone. You will get it yet.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
8:43 pm
Bobcats 6 ahead of the Cav’s – how fun is that.
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
8:54 pm
O’Brien,
I’ll play! I would like to see the Hawks give Teague some more minutes. I think he has a bright future, but he needs to build his confidence. The only way to do that is to put him on the floor. There is no doubt that he is very athletic!
Do you think the Hawks will go hard after Big Z?
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
8:55 pm
KevinA,
JJ has never minded working off the ball as long as he gets enough touches. In fact, his high ebb in terms of seeming happy to be a Hawk was right after we got Bibby and, for a time, he didn’t have to act as lead guard virtually at all. The problem in Phoenix is that Amare was the focal point for Nash’s passing, followed by Marion, and then him. If Nash were here, JJ would still get his touches because he is our best offensive player. He’d just get them more in the flow of the offense and would get more open looks. D’Antoni himself said that JJ wasn’t selfish, but just felt he was ready for a bigger role in the offense than the Suns could offer him (though ironically, the injury to Amare in 2005 might have led to him being the focal point that year anyway).
Blast
February 19th, 2010
8:56 pm
For Marvin lovers/haters, he is on feature on FSS right now.
Yup, KevinA. That is a stretch, one can only hope
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
8:56 pm
Same with Jamal, btw. I don’t think he’d care about who was handling the point as long as he wasn’t relegated to a Marvin-like role.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
8:59 pm
niremetal
I agree with you
The difference Nash would make is there would be no 8-22. If JJ was cold he would look for other options. Our team is good but we need that leadership.
Rod from College Park
February 19th, 2010
8:59 pm
F.I.L.A,
Rod from College Park…..Get off marvin williams nuts man..Thats all you do is talk about marvin..Lol what type of man are you sir?
The kind of man who does not talk about another man’s nuts. No homo. What kind of man are you to be so focused so much on what I post?
Astro Joe
February 19th, 2010
9:00 pm
Wow, same blog?
Chat during half-time. Hawks win by 5 tonight!
niremetal
February 19th, 2010
9:00 pm
I agree with you 100% on that, KevinA. Having a coach that isn’t afraid to bench JJ (or at least take him off the ball) when he’s cold would be another solution. But that’s about as likely to happen in the near future as us getting Nash…
Grandad
February 19th, 2010
9:00 pm
R.f.C.P.
I didn’t say I just attended games.
Basketball has been my profession for over 30 years.
I am most qualified to evaluate basketball skill level.
[retired prematurely,health]
You mentioned Rodman, how ironic, my all-time favorite player for
the exact reasons mentioned:
*Great defender
*Great rebounder (true size/ 6-6)
*Great teammate
*Great passer
*7 pts. per.
*Crazy as heck
*He would start on any team I ever coached
*Winner
*5 Rings
Rebounding – (Marv 5.1/29 min.)(Rudy 5.9/39 min.)
I never said Rudy was a bad player…just that for us, Marv is a
better value.
Ill-logical – said it best; “if we go after Rudy it would be to replace Joe.”
Melvin – I didn’t say we couldn’t use a slasher…just that anyone we acquire as a perimeter player needs to be able to shoot. Rudy can’t shoot. That’s where I disagree with Ill-logical, I don’t think Rudy will ever be Joe. He never lived up to his enormous potential in college and I don’t see him as a franchise player now. Joe is just a
shade under the top echelon players.
Back to Rod – have an open mind.
I try to only take a point of view if it can be justified and sustainable. At the same time one must keep an open mind at all times,
otherwise a person can never adapt.
Second to last point, I respect your background, whatever it may be.
Now – lastly – my forefathers were quite a mixture: Scotch,Irish,German,
Cherokee. I doubt I’m kin to Marv. But according to KS I could be kin to
him. I would be most proud to claim either one.
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
9:01 pm
What I love about Nash is he will defer to who is hot. Then will pick up the slack only if needed.
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
9:03 pm
KevinA,
That’s what a leader does.
Hoops
February 19th, 2010
9:05 pm
ESPN just reported that the Wizzards just wavied Big Z!!! Hawks need to go get him!!!
KevinA
February 19th, 2010
9:06 pm
What is funny is Bibby and Marvin are the most self reglated players on the team. The rest really need a good PG. One of the reasons I liked Chills. Another self regulated player.
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
9:06 pm
Hawks playing in Phoenix, where we got JJ? Studemire not being traded, any fallout?
So no game blog tonight?
O'Brien
February 19th, 2010
9:07 pm
found the game blog. right on time
Ken Strickland
February 19th, 2010
9:15 pm
DANIEL-there are too many variables and unknowns for me to make that call. Both Van Gundy and Brown have at their disposal 2 of the NBA’s most dominant players, and Woody doesn’t. I see some of the same issues with Van Gundy that I see with Woodson, but Van Gundy is definitely better than Woodson when it comes to using strategy and making adjustments.
Far too often I’ve seen Orlando shooting and missing one jumpshot after another, like us, while completely ignoring DHoward in the paint. This happens routinely, and in the end, it falls on Van Gundy to get his players, particularly his PG’s, to run the OFF through DHoward. We have the same problem and it’s Woodson’s fault for not being able or willing to bet Bibby to go inside more, especially when we’re not hitting our outside shots.
F.I.L.A
February 21st, 2010
6:55 pm
Rod From College Park- Lol well I do read the ajc and these blogs on the daily and I cant help but notice all you do is talk about marvin like he is the problem with our team..What do you have against him anyway? What do you expect out of a 5th option? Like why is he the only thing you talk about on here?
SLAM ONLINE | » Game Notes: Hawks at Suns
February 22nd, 2010
12:21 pm
[...] the need to regain focus after the deadline, though rumors continue to swirl that they’d like a shot at Zydrunas Ilgauskas once he’s been waived by the Wizards. Of course, he hasn’t been waived yet, so [...]
Hawks interested in Ilgauskas? | Soaring Down South | An Atlanta Hawks blog
March 15th, 2010
7:43 pm
[...] Michael Cunningham reported that the Hawks are expected to be among the suitors for former Cavaliers center Zydrunas Ilgauskas. Ilgauskas was traded to Washington in the Antawn Jamison trade and is expected to be bought out by the Wizards. While it is widely assmued that Ilgauskas will return to Cleveland once the 30 day waiting period has expired. However, it also appears that teams like Dallas, Denver, and perhaps Atlanta are going to bid for his services. I want to caution that in the Cunningham post he doesn’t actually say that management said that we would be interested, just that we are expected to be interested. That is two very different things. It makes a ton of sense for the Hawks. Ilgauskas is a legit 7 footer with a ton of experience and of course if we got him it would prevent him from going back to Cleveland. The Hawks have carried the league minimum 13 players all season. [...]