Joe Smith out, and some tidbits

Hello, Hawks fans-

Hope you are all well. A few things.

1) Joe Smith won’t be making the trip to Toronto. He’ll stay home for treatment, and Othello Hunter will be activated in his place. It’s possible Smith could play Sunday against New Jersey, but it would seem like that’d be an outside shot, perhaps somewhat dependent on what Hunter does against Toronto. Mike Woodson said Marvin Williams could be an option at 4 behind Al Horford if he doesn’t get what he wants from Hunter.

Smith had his hand in a wrap Thursday. He said the thumb was very sore.

2) A quick thought on Wednesday’s game:

They got a lot of help from the Bulls (Kirk Hinrich, playing after missing the last six games with a sprained thumb, missed all nine of his shots) but the Hawks played pretty tough defense for the second game in a row. They held Dallas and Chicago under 40 percent shooting and, if the fourth quarter hadn’t turned into an AAU game between the backups, they would have held both teams to their season lows for points.

I asked Joe Johnson if this was a turning point, defensively, for the team.

“I don’t know,” he said. “I hope so. We’ve been pretty good.”

3.) I think someone might have posted this already, but the Hawks reportedly lost $2 million last season, according to Forbes magazine. The report also said that the team is worth $306 million, which is 21st in the league.

4) To move along one of our favorite topics, Marvin Williams. Woodson on No. 24, from before Wednesday’s game:

“He’s still young. … When we got him, he was only 18, 19 years old. (He was 19 on opening night) He played on a national title team and played 20 minutes a game. He hasn’t played much ball is kind of how I look at it. He’s still learning.”

439 comments Add your comment

bigdave

December 10th, 2009
2:31 pm

bigdave

December 10th, 2009
2:37 pm

Daniel…

where did you see Kirby Smart was coming to UGA?

Crashing the glass

December 10th, 2009
2:58 pm

For more on the Chicago stomping-

http://crashingtheglass.com/

Matt

December 10th, 2009
3:09 pm

james

December 10th, 2009
3:19 pm

Aww cmon Hawk fans

Forwards: LeBron James (Clev) 649,327; Kevin Garnett (Bos) 533,187; Chris Bosh (Tor) 303,550; Paul Pierce (Bos) 131,379; Josh Smith (Atl) 109,404; Danny Granger (Ind) 100,122; Andre Iguodala (Phi) 75,146; Michael Beasley (Mia) 58,461; Hedo Turkoglu (Tor) 55,416; Rashard Lewis (Orl) 46,073; Luol Deng (Chi) 37,428.

Guards: Dwyane Wade (Mia) 672,227; Vince Carter (Orl) 292,002; Gilbert Arenas (Was) 212,526; Ray Allen (Bos) 208,276 Derrick Rose (Chi) 196,059; Allen Iverson (Phi) 136,976*; Joe Johnson (Atl) 118,964; Rajon Rondo (Bos) 113,371; Jose Calderon (Tor) 68,084; Mike Bibby (Atl) 48,935.

Centers: Dwight Howard (Orl) 625,279; Shaquille O’Neal (Cle) 206,657; Andrea Bargnani (Tor) 67,310; Al Horford (Atl) 52,747; Andrew Bogut (Mil) 45,920; Brook Lopez (NJ) 39,420; Jermaine O’Neal (Mia) 38,956; Rasheed Wallace (Bos) 36,855; Kendrick Perkins (Bos) 19,408; Brad Miller (Chi) 17,188; Tyson Chandler (Cha) 14,062; Samuel Dalembert, (Phi) 13,969.

Cmon we need to work on getting Al into 3rd place among centers , Smoove into top 5 among forwards and Joe into top 5 among guards . We also should get Crawford into the top 7 guards as well no way Arenas should be 3rd with Joe and Crawford the top two scorers on the 3rd best team in the conference and 5th best in the league .

After last nights game Crawford is now 12th among all shooting guards in the league in scoring and 7th in fg%.

Lets get the vote out and get all of our guys represented better in the fan voting.

heelsfan

December 10th, 2009
3:35 pm

Woody hit it right on the head. Marvin is still very young and he didn’t start his only year at Carolina. I think people are expecting way to mucj of this kid. He is not as good as Chris Paul or Deron Williams but I think Billy Knight did a wondering job of drafting Marvin. The Hawks have improved every year and has made the playoff just about as many times as the Hornets. Marvin has a terrific attitude ans is willing to do anything that is asked of him. How many other players in the NBA can you say that about. Get off Marvin because if you trade him it will bite you.

J.J.M.

December 10th, 2009
3:48 pm

it doesnt matter coaches will vote joe,josh,and horford in but I think josh should be starting

Banks

December 10th, 2009
3:57 pm

Heelsfan , Billy Knight did a wonderful job drafing Marvin are you crazy!!!!!. Marvin is a role player at best. You do not draft role players with the 3rd pick in the draft you draft impact players.

Daniel

December 10th, 2009
4:07 pm

bigdave- I was just messing with Clyde. Totally pulling his leg. Would be nice though.

rms

December 10th, 2009
4:11 pm

So why the heck did you draft him if you knew he didnt play much! You already had a forward, DUMMY!

Ken Strickland

December 10th, 2009
4:13 pm

The Hawks need to win at least 5 of the next 6gms, because after we play the Wolves, we’ll encounter a string of 19 difficult gms indeed. After playing MIN, we’ll close out DEC playing DEN, IND, and CLE(back to back), then start JAN playing MIA, BOS(3times), ORL(twice), PHO, HOU and the SPURS.

I don’t know if we’ll fair very well if we try to approach that schedule and those teams using a 7-8 man rotation and playing JJ close to 40MPG like we’ve done over the last 15gms. We need to take a lesson from last nights gm and continue to run, attack the basket, maintain ball movement, spread the wealth and utilizing our bench, not relying as much of 3pt shooting, ISO’s, one on one play and play solid straight up man to man DEF.

WE’RE HAVE THE TALENT AND ABILITY TO BE A MUCH BETTER TEAM THAN OUR WON/LOSS RECORD WOULD INDICATE.

RLP

December 10th, 2009
4:22 pm

To my way of thinking discussions on which team the Hawks will meet in the second round of the playoffs, while interesting, is not germane to this point in the season. We have learned (1.) that the Hawks were able to defeat the Celtics in Boston during the regular season; (2.) that the Hawks displayed an ability to play with the Magic for one half during their first meeting which means that maybe if the team plays to a high level for 48 minutes they may be competitive against the Magic in a playoff match; (3.)Cleveland does not appear to have benefited from the chance to their team that occurred during the off-season (in fact it is my opinion the team may have regressed since last year); and finally(4.)we have a home and away series coming up against the Cavs that will give us more insight into where we stand in the East after that weekend is completed.

As far as all of the rhetoric about Al Horford my view is that there is only one center in the East that stands hands and shoulders above him. My solution to that center is to find an elephant gun and use it on him every time he tries to cross the center line. Seriously there is no trade that we can make that will make up competitive at that position. In order to overcome that weakness the team must try to minimize the damage and play to their strengths like they did for one half of their first encounter this year. All of us should be happy that we will be facing them again during the regular season.

cp

December 10th, 2009
4:28 pm

Even when Joe Smith comes back the Hawks need to keep Hunter activated and let Collins wear a suit until he gets in some type of shape. That dude is terrible. Bibby is clearly hurt so increase Teague’s minutes and let him get more experience. We have some very winnable games coming up so it might be the right time to let the youngster play.

Rufus1

December 10th, 2009
4:30 pm

Woodson

Is Woody a championship coach?
If woody is not a championship coach…why keep him?

Is woody sacrificing long term development for regular season wins?
I believe he is…maybe Rick Sund also believes that?

Is Bibby a championship PG?
If he is not a championship PG..why not give Teague the bulk min(I.E Rondo), so he can be a force during the playoffs.

Could another coach do better?
I believe another coached could do better developing a PG. That is enough for me to make a coaching change, because I don’t believe we will acquire a true center. We will have to become a championship team, by being very good offensively and defensively at every position.

We are good enough to make the playoffs with Teague as our PG, But we are not good enough to win a championship with Bibby as our PG.

If you are faced with this dilemma’s, do you keep Woody?

Ken Sugiura

December 10th, 2009
4:34 pm

thanks for the info, james, and thanks for the kind words, matt.

good take, RLP. that cleveland series will indeed be a good insight. i don’t know why the league scheduled it like that – it’s the only time on the schedule where the hawks play the same team back to back – but it’ll be interesting. glad i’ll be doing both of those games.

Ken Strickland – good point. I hadn’t looked at the schedule that closely, outside of the Boston-Orlando-Boston stretch, but end of December to end of January is a bear.

newkid

December 10th, 2009
4:47 pm

If Sund and the organization decide – at some point – that it’s in the best interest of the HAWKS to move Marvin, is that hating? If such a move nets us a player who does more to help us get to that illusive ‘next level’, do we care if Marvin the individual player comes back to haunt us? Hope the answer to both questions is “NO” without equivocation. Winning the O’Brien trophy shouldn’t be about falling in lust with one player or another; nas to be about how to best construct a side that’ll bring a June parade to Peachtree Street.

JLABOMB

December 10th, 2009
4:51 pm

Anyone thinking Bibby does not help this team is nuts. There is a reason they are #1 in fewest turnovers. When Bibby is out they start making turn overs. It is not just his numbers he is a stabilizing factors. I think Teague is coming along at a good pace, he still has a lot to learn. Also I think the pick n roll with Bibby and Horford or Smith is just about our most effective play we always end up with a good shot afterwards.

jerrywest

December 10th, 2009
4:55 pm

I think back to back game with Cleveland is an advantage for us. Shaq/Big Z will be burnt out in the second night of running behind our bigs.

ILL-logical

December 10th, 2009
4:59 pm

Whenever the discussion turns to w/not Al is the center that the team needs to win a championship or w/not he is competitive in the short run , one point that has not been clarified is that when I make the point about the need for a different center, it is in the playoffs where the need becomes acute.. When the Hawks have to play a 7 game serise with a physically dominent center like a Dwight ,Shaq or Bynam we may use quickness to compete for 1 or 2 games but over the course of the 7 games brawn and height are going to prevail 9 times out of 10 and especially with highly skilled players like the aforementioned trio.

Does this mean that Al is not a heck of a player? No ! My point is that long term the Hawks have to look at playing a bigger team starting at center to win it all IMHO.

And that player probably will have to be develoed from the currrent roster because one of the prices of succes in the NBA is not getting a high draft position unless you can make a trade.

fudd21

December 10th, 2009
5:03 pm

JJM, I think if Garnett is elected as a starter it will hurt Josh’s chance of making the team. Bosh, Pierce, and Granger (if he’s not hurt) will probably be selected by the coaches before Josh.

Rufus1

December 10th, 2009
5:23 pm

Bibby

I think Bibby is a fine PG and very good leader. I believe Woodson should be able to develop a PG who is quick, athletic and can be just as effective as Bibby running the offense. Woodson has had 5 years and 2 1st rounders to develop a PG…When will we get our future.

This is the best year to let a young PG play…because we will still be the 4th seed with Teague playing 20 min.

Astro Joe

December 10th, 2009
5:39 pm

Rufus, based on your logic, the Cavs should fire Mike Brown immediately, because there is nothing about him that screams “championship coach”. Rondo received a lot of playing time during his rookie campaign that resulted in less than 30 wins for the Celtics. And he didn’t have anyone nearly as good as Bibby in front of him. Let the young man learn at a pace befitting a college junior playing for a team attempting to move beyond the second round of the playoffs. Slow and easy.

Big Ray

December 10th, 2009
5:44 pm

Very balanced view by Woody on Marvin. Certainly more patient than what many of us have exhibited.

Great posts by Newkid and Astro Joe .

F_ck Ken Sugiura

December 10th, 2009
5:52 pm

WHO BLOCKS ANY ONE WHO DOESNT SHARE HIS VIEW

tyger

December 10th, 2009
6:16 pm

Chris Paul trade?

New Orleans in trouble. Coach fired. Small market. On the hook for Paul, Mo Pete, Stojokavic, Posey, Okafor and not winning.

Do the Hawks need him and what would it take?

Crawford, Smoove, Horford, JJ aint going nowhere but Marvin/Bibby/Teague could pry an unhappy Paul/1st pick away and give Hornets cost-effective young players to rebuild around.

ATL could finally put the Paul over Marvin debate behind them. Hawks get smaller but better. Depth could become an issue, but we have ball handlers in Evans, Crawford and JJ.

Probably more minutes for Joe Smith, Pachulia, RandMo.

Don’t see ATL spirit keeping Bibby beyond trade deadline anyway.

Rufus1

December 10th, 2009
6:29 pm

Astro is your goal the 2nd round of the playoffs?

I thought Rondo went to the Celtics the year they won the championship…I could be wrong.

If you decide that your goal is a championship and you believe the coach you have can’t get you there…you replace him.

An organization must decide what it’s goals are and then make the hard decisions. Bibby is the worst defensive PG in the league and we have to worry about his long term viability. I do not suggest trading him, but reducing his minutes and giving them to Teague. I think Bibby is an important piece, but he can’t be the long term solution.

When Bibby’s jumper isn’t falling, he is liability.

darrell starks

December 10th, 2009
6:46 pm

tyger i like the trade scenario for chris paul but it would destroy our bench rotation and we no you cant win in the nba with and 8man rotation.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!

darrell starks

December 10th, 2009
6:47 pm

I SAY LETS GET BIGGER AND MOVE HORFORD 2 POWER FORWARD.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!

darrell starks

December 10th, 2009
6:54 pm

I no andris biedrins is hurt right now but this is the perfect opportunity 2 get him, may be for a number 1 draft pick and no player involved.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

December 10th, 2009
6:58 pm

STARTER BIBBY, JOE, JOSH, HORFORD, BIEDRINS,
BENCH CRAWFORD, MOE, MARVIN, JOE SMITH, ZAZA.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

BILLY NIGHT

December 10th, 2009
7:06 pm

darrell starks i like that trade but i think it would take more than just a number 1pick for andris biedrins.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 10th, 2009
7:09 pm

I brought up the possibility over the summer of the Hornets possibly being willing to listen to 80 cents on the dollar offers for CP3 if they continue to flounder, but I still think if the Hawks were to approach them, there’s no way they pull the trigger on a deal like that without Joe Johnson going the other way. I do think that if the Hawks were to put together a package including Johnson, Teague, and a first rounder, such a trade may still be worth it in the long run. I don’t think the Hawks would be significantly worse, if at all, with a lineup of Paul-Crawford-Marvin-Josh-Horford — especially if they find a way to bolster the SG or SF positions in the draft or free agency after making such a trade.

That said, it would be unbelievably foolish to make a trade involving your best player in midseason when you are on pace for 55 wins. If such a trade is going to happen, it would have to be next summer as a sign-and-trade.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 10th, 2009
7:13 pm

No way a 23-year-old nightly double-double and shot blocking threat gets traded for just a pick, especially not by a team that has zero inside presence besides him.

Ken Strickland

December 10th, 2009
7:40 pm

All of the discussions about trading Marvin is crazy, because there are far more important issues for the ASG to consider than that. For instance, what do we do about JJ? How hard should the ASG push to resign him? While JJ is a better all around player, especially on DEF, Crawford is a better OFF player. What do we do to get Horford’s contract extended, since we all know other NBA teams will make every effort to sign a player of his calibur and versatility away from us.

Retaining those 2 players would be far more beneficial to the Hawks than any player we might get in a trade for Marvin. It’s really comical to read some of the comments about Marvin being absolutely worthless from some of the same individuals that are suggesting we trade this worthless player for an Allstar or potential Allstar calibur player they have a preference for. It’s like they think the HC’s and GM’s around the league are as stupid as they are.

KEN SUGIURA-Like you, I wasn’t focued much past the back to back gms with Cleveland. But when I noticed how relatively weak the teams we’ll play leading up to the Cleveland series, I figured we’d have to pay a price somewhere along the line, so I looked. That’s when I saw us having a heavy dose of Cleveland, Boston and Orlando. Starting with Cleveland, 7 or our next 19gms will be against these 3 teams. We even have a stretch where we play Boston and Orlando back to back and then Boston again all in 4days.

If we intend to weather this 19gm stretch, Woodson can’t afford to keep over playing our key players, especially if they’re injured, and limiting our bench contributions, like he tends to do when we face tougher competition.

O'Brien

December 10th, 2009
7:42 pm

“tyger i like the trade scenario for chris paul but it would destroy our bench rotation and we no you cant win in the nba with an 8man rotation” darrell starks, December 10th, 2009, 6:46 pm

Darrell, I agree. However, you know how much Woody likes a 8 man rotation lol

Ken Strickland, Although the schedule is very tough, the Hawks are known to compete very well against teams .500 or better.

That being said, my biggest concern is if the Hawks lose a tough game to one of those teams, will they keep it together, or will they go on a losing streak (I feel like I just contradicted myself).

Samuel

December 10th, 2009
8:28 pm

In case yall haven’t noticed, all the “Championship” coaches are working some where,have retired or have died.
Dumb ass_s

Astro Joe

December 10th, 2009
8:35 pm

Rufus, it’s nice to say that an NBA title is the goal, but when you think about the practical ways of making that happen, you find that you end up chasing your tail. I’m fairly certain that in modern times, exceeding the luxury tax is the first way to build a true title contender.

And yes, Rondo definitely started in the woeful season of the Celtics, prior to the KG & Ray Allen trades. And wasn’t Rondo a college senior when he left Kentucky?

Teague’s minutes should increase as the year progresses… but I don’t think he should average 20 minutes in his first 40 games in the NBA. Not as long as Bibby is leading a team that is first in TOs and is clearly an improved offensive team.

honest_abe

December 10th, 2009
8:47 pm

aj: rondo avged 20+ minutes his rookie year off the bench. so i don’t think he is a good comparison.

here are some comparable rookie minutes:

tony parker avged 29 min
baron davis avged 19 min
rajon rondo avged 24 min
jameer nelson avged 20 min
mario chalmers avged 32 min
raymond felton avged 30.1 min
gilbert arenas avged 25 min
devin harris avged 15.4 min
chris duhon avged 27 min

this years rookies
ty lawson 21.3 min
jrue holiday 15.4 min
darren collison 22 min
eric maynor 15.2 min
(i left out most of the obvious lottery picks because they would obviously get more p.t. i.e. paul, d-will, jennings, evans)

and of course our very own jeff teague avging a paltry 9.6 min.

this of course after hearing all the positive news out of the hawks preseason camp that this kid could really play. that woody expected big contributions from him during the season. i’m not saying teague is as good or better than every player listed what i am saying is that in order to see some development and improvement you have to let the young kid play through mistakes and give him some serious/consistent minutes. most everyone on this blog thought ac could ball. the problem was he never got on the floor. he lost whatever confidence he had, then add the injury issues along with the subsequent weight issues and the rest is history. now he can’t get any burn on a bad warriors squad. either the hawks draft pg’s with no ability or woody is just too damn scared or doesn’t know how to win while developing young players.

honest_abe

December 10th, 2009
8:47 pm

aj: rondo was a sophomore

honest_abe

December 10th, 2009
8:58 pm

aj: one last thing… i’m pretty sure the majority of cavs fans would love to see mike brown gone. and to tell you the truth he should be booted. he’s got the best player in the world with a decent cast and just lost back to back games to memphis and houston. he hasn’t even been to the finals with lebron. imagine him coaching any other team. scary.

Rufus1

December 10th, 2009
9:09 pm

Astro

Honest-abe has some good points.. I agree Bibby is what we need NOW, but we can’t sacrifice another young PG for 2 or 3 more victories. Teague must have an opportunity to develop and 9 min is not enough.

Is it possible Woody does not know how to develop a PG…that would explain alot. It has been 6 years.

Sautee

December 10th, 2009
9:11 pm

Wow, it’s like old times with AJ and abe going back and forth.

Did I step in the way back machine? ;-)

Good to see you both here.

Sautee

December 10th, 2009
9:16 pm

Rufus,

How can you say that Woodson is no good at developing points guards?

Didn’t he develop Joe Johnson via “Iso-Joe”? ;-)

I mean Joe was never an All-Star until Woody handed him the ball and told the team to get out of the way, right?

Note: I’m calling Joe a point guard because he dominates the ball on offense.

And this is tongue-in-cheek, in case anybody doesn’t recognize it.

Samuel

December 10th, 2009
9:26 pm

Again,

I keep hearing all you “scrubbs” crying to get rid of Woody but I haven’t heard any names as to who would replace him. Your usual guys taken(F. Sanders, E. Jordan ect). Look how they are tearing up the league.I guess the only likely choices left are Avery(Mr. Bill) Johnson and Mark Jackson. I guess they are championship coaches, huh?

Get Real
Woody=COY

Rufus1

December 10th, 2009
9:32 pm

Sautee

That is what Billy Knight wanted…JJ the PG.
Teague is atleast as good as Darren Collison and Eric Maynor.

Rufus1

December 10th, 2009
9:52 pm

Samuel

I am not asking for Woodson’s head Yet, but we have one glaring weakness on our team and he has not fixed it(6 yrs). Houston turned the team over to Brooks during a playoff run, but Teague can’t get more than 9 min. This is the guy he wanted, this is the guy he bragged about. All the guys we drafted can’t be terrible…Jerry Sloan keeps hitting HR with his PG’s. Most of use would trade Teague and Bibby for Brooks, but he can’t become like Brooks if he does play.

Teague has Brooks skill set.

RaJaH

December 10th, 2009
10:17 pm

I’m still on the fence about Woody. If Sund decides to extend him, I think it’s important that an offensive coordinator be next on the agenda.

honest_abe

December 10th, 2009
10:22 pm

scrubb as defined by tlc:

A scrub is a guy that thinks he’s fly and is
also known as a buster
always talkin’ about what he wants
and just sits on his broke ass

yes that sounds an awful like samuel.

scrubb as defined by me

a scrubb is a moron who thought marcus williams was the 2nd coming of magic johnson. a scrubb is someone who thinks that steve nash’s only contribution to the game of basketball is his awesome hair do’s. a scrubb is someone who thinks that mike woodson aka mr. potato head is a better coach than hall of famer larry brown.

the biggest scrubb on this board is samuel.

amen.

honest_abe

December 10th, 2009
10:28 pm

sautee: thanks. glad to be back on this thing. nothing like rehashing the same thing in a million different ways. hey at the least the hawks are winning now. heh

Ken Strickland

December 10th, 2009
10:35 pm

We’ve played very good DEF the last 2gms. I’ve also noticed we haven’t played as much switching DEF in either gm. Even though Bibby was hobbling and shouldn’t have been on the court, he didn’t hurt us nearly as bad as usual. Of course, it made a big difference that our frontline players were able to remain near the basket and prevented DRose from consistently penetrating all the way to the basket.

We’re a much better DEF when we don’t try to protect Bibby by switching on every pick. All teams are afraid to go all of the way to the basket with Smoove under there. Teams just love it when we switch and they end up with Smoove or Horford out on the perimeter getting beaten off the dribble by their PG/SG, with Bibby under the basket providing their only backup.

I don’t know how many times I’ve seen BIG RAY explain how our switching DEF doesn’t hide Bibby’s weakness, it actually makes it easier for a team to expose and take advantage of it. IF YOU THINK HORFORD IS TOO UNDERSIZED TO BE EFFECTIVE AGAINST THE BIGGER, STRONGER CENTERS, WHAT MAKES ANYONE WITH A CLUE THINK BIBBY IS BETTER EQUIPPED TO DO SO. After all, who do you think he’ll end up guarding when the opposition runs a pick and roll with their PG and Center and we switch?

When we switch on every pick, we usually end up playing poor DEF overall, but when we play straight man to man DEF, we usually end up playing solid DEF overall. These are the types of persistent problems that a HC that pays attention to detail should notice and address. This is why some of us say we need a HC that can develop strategies, particularly during gms, recognize and think through situations and make adjustments. It would also be nice if some of his more ardent supporters could do the same.

Ken Strickland

December 10th, 2009
10:50 pm

RAJAH-Ordinarily, hiring an OFF coordinator for this team would be an excellent idea. However, we’re talking about a HC that won’t even assign certain detailed oriented tasks that he’s stated he has no interest in to his assistants, like managing players mins or monitoring the OFF.

Forcing him to accept an OFF coordinator would setup a situation simular to the one the Falcons had under Dan Reeves when ABlank forced him to hire a DEF coordinator. Reeves felt very uncomfortable and threatened by having WPhillips running his DEF. He also had the same insecurities and felt threatened by having MShannahan as his OFF coordinator at Denver. I can see the same situation manifesting itself with Woodson.

Besides, if Sund thinks Woodson needs an OFF coordinator after 6yrs, it’s better to let him go and hire a new HC along with that OC.

E43

December 11th, 2009
1:27 am

the 10 man rotation must get significant minutes and theres no excuse jeff teagues situation is begining to look too much similar to a certain point guard tennure with the hawks.

id rather see othelo/morris/colins plug into joe smiths minute slot than have joe playing 40 minutes again.we had 5 allstar choices despite everyone but joe and all taking significant playing time cuts

if marvin had plays run for him im sure hed be a beast by now. soo much iso joe was what killed the hawks. now he might not have the shooting percentage but. his shooting percentage suggest that he can put up 20+games given the right amount of minutestelling him to be more agressive is not necesarily a good thing coz he is visibly trying too hard. he should just do like old times and let the game come to him. if someone gets hurt and he has to pick up his tempo im sure hed keep you from mentioning his name on trade scenarios. Joe is the man in atlanta everyone elses minutes droping is proof.

Hawks Fan In New Orleans

December 11th, 2009
2:16 am

Joe is the boss – but m new nickname for Jamal Crawford is Jamal the Great!
BTW with The Magic loss tonight – the Hawks inch to 1 1/2 games behind Orlando for tops in the Southeast Division. With an easy (on paper) stretch of games lined up. Exciting times indeed to be a fan.

mountain dawg

December 11th, 2009
2:31 am

Teague is tentative and indecisive. Until he can become more “alpha” and believe in himself, he should not start for the playoff bound Hawks. What is wrong with Bibby starting? He is a veteran PG surrounded by youngsters. We need him in there.

nunna yo biznezz

December 11th, 2009
3:39 am

mike woodson said,”Marvin Williams could be an option at 4 behind Al Horford if he doesn’t get what he wants from Hunter.”

Are u kidding me?? is this guy for real??
othello has not played in 1 game this year!!
no game time experience at all this year..
but,u are willing to throw him out in the fire and give him a one and done ultimatum..

well u know what coach.
if he fails,it will be your fault..
you have done nothing to help develope this young man and his talent at all..

it was josh childress who went back to his stanford coaches with help on his defense and his offensive game to help him to get where he is today and the last year when he played here..not u and your staff!!

it was akeem the dream who helped josh smith with his rebounding game and his low post play 2 years ago that helped him last year and this year..remember everybody??
not woody or his staff!!

and,so,it has dawned on you that u want to set othello up to fail,and talk crap about he must come out and play or you will use marvin at the number 4?

why not,develope him coach??
why not give this guy some playing time,even if its every other game to get himself acclamated with this team..

you have done nothing with the young talent that u got thru the drafting of billy knight,not even with al horford..
he was already who he was when we got him..point blank!!

every week u say something weak..
every freaking weak u say something that makes u look like u don’t know nothing..
this team wins in spite of u..

northcyde

December 11th, 2009
4:26 am

Woody can’t win with some fans. That’s why he simply brush off his haters to the side. That dude could win a championship, and you’d still have people complaining about Teague’s playing time or the fact that we didn’t beat a team by double digits, on our way to a title.

I truly ( for real ) feel sorry for some of these guys though. We’re 15 – 6, but the complainers are so used to complaining, that they can’t even enjoy this team.

LOL . . we have to be the only fan base that has some guys crying about our 1OTH MAN getting increased playing time.

wordsmithtom

December 11th, 2009
7:15 am

Nunna Yo Bisnezz,
You are correct: Hunter hasn’t played this season. He did, however, get extensive minutes in preseason and played last year; he practices with the squad. Coach knows what Hunter can do. I didn’t see the same “one and done” ultimatum you seem to dislike. I see a coach pointing out options to replace the 9min-3 pps he loses in Joe S.
Also, Hunter knows Coach’s system; he also knows the score: be ready when called upon. Coach is giving him 2 days to “Get your head right, son, or I’ll find someone who will get their head right”.

Bench players have NO GUARANTEE of minutes or development. I don’t get this “it’s somebody else’s fault if I don’t succeed” crap. It’s HUNTER’S fault if HUNTER doesn’t answer the call. Period. The NBA is NOT an entitlement: it’s a meritocracy.

I hope Hunter answers the call. I also see no problem with slipping MW into the 4 slot for 8-10 minutes of backup and letting Evans pick up a few min in his place. MW has never been forced to bang with the 4’s of this league. He’ big enough and would offer a lot of matchup problems, if he is willing to bang. By being able to step out and shoot the 3ball, he creates mismatches. We already know he will rebound. At this point in the season, I’d as soon see the experiment with MW…especially if Hunter won’t hunt. I know MW will bust butt, even when he’s missing shots. He hustles.

That’s what Woodson’s saying: “If I don’t see what I want from Hunter”. He WANTS to see “BUSTING BUTT” in the minutes…not entitlement. He is not only outlining his options, but challenging a young man to “show me”. Man up, or man out….

Big Ump

December 11th, 2009
7:27 am

Northcyde you are so right. Sometime I think they be watching a different games then the rest of do. Some of the stuff they post is outrageous. Do you ever notice when the Hawks win they come with some garbage that the reason they won is because the Hawks did what they had been complainig about or the Hawks or the HC read their post.They always write 1 sentence about how they give the team and HC credit and
then write a half of page b—hing about the HC and that they could do a better job. If they said they are a Hawk fan like they claim,why not go to Sund and tell him that they the man for the job and can take the team to the next level. I’m quite sure all the real Hawks fans wouldn’t
have a problem with that at all. You got a couple of blogger’s who get very upset when you don’t agree with them and then you become a HC lover or other names. But watch them cause they will try to revers that.
Also have you ever notice blogger’s agree and disagree with each other and no one calling anybody names and then this certain blogger come on and start calling names because someone don’t see his point of view. I know you know who I’m talking about. Sure the team and and HC don’t play or coach like we think they should at times. but one thing about it and I don’t care how you try to spin it, the Hawks are playing decent basketball this year and winning. So don’t give me this crap that they should have won all there games if they had did this of that.
Can you tell me what team have won every game? Thought so.

Macaroni Tony

December 11th, 2009
7:41 am

I think we should support the blog http://www.crashingtheglass.com. With good support, this guy blog could be big.

Macaroni Tony

December 11th, 2009
7:42 am

I know that Toronto will want revenge from their last whipping so we have to play hard. I also know that Bibby is not 100%, so JT minutes should increase today.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
7:52 am

I love the idea of bringing Hunter in for some work. I pray he focusses on tight D and rebounding. Hopefully he’ll get some put-backs on offensive boards and potentially a few blocks. The guy is very athletic. If he doesn’t try to shoot to impress he should do fine. With a good showing I pray he can sit Collins on the end of the bench in a suit for a while. Joe Smith needs to take the time to recoup 100% and give Othella time to prove he’s put in the work. Othello is a determined kid. I’m excited to see what happens.

Who’s to say we can’t move Randmo and ZaZa out at the same time instead of the usual Smith & ZaZa? I’m definitely for giving Randmo more minutes based on his performances this year.

Next few games are critical wins, but definitely a time to give minutes to the 2nd unit for development. If we burn our starters trying to win every game we run the risk of running out of gas w/ no replacement when the tough stretch comes early in 2010.

4th seed is not guaranteed. We got some tough games ahead. Bench play and a solid effort from all starters is critical to maintaining the 4th seed and potentially moving up.

Steve Brown

December 11th, 2009
8:11 am

This is all make believe. By all reports Joe Johnson is gone. As the season progresses players (if they care) will start to feel that it makes little sense playing with him as he is out for himself. He can’t be the team leader under this circumstance. Get real and trade him ASAP, let’s see what our actual team looks like going forward.

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
8:16 am

Abe, I didn’t know that you had returned… good to hear form you. Here’s the reality (as I see it), Teague is this team’s 4th string PG. Behind Bibby, Joe and Jamal. And honestly, I would prefer to see any of those 3 running the offense right now. Yes, Teague needs to be developed. His minutes should increase by maybe 2-4 minutes every 20 games. But he is NOT the 2nd string PG… so to expect him to get 20 minutes over these veteran playmakers just doesn’t seem realistic. I know what we all want from Teague…. but some times you end up with Jordan Farmar and not Devin Harris.

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
8:22 am

Oh, and add in that Teague was the 7th PG taken in the draft. Show me where the 7th best player drafted at his position gets 20 minutes a game for a team on pace to win 50 games in his rookie season. (And Ty Lawson is truly the 3rd best guard on Denver… behind Billups and Smith. Teague is not our 3rd best guard).

JeJe

December 11th, 2009
8:38 am

I know exactly what will happen tonight:
It’s the same thing as last week. We won a big game mid-week (this week it was Chicago — last week it was Toronto). Tonight it will be a tough game in a very hostile environment. Woodson will ABANDON everything that went right the other night, including his rotations. He will NOT use RandMo or Collins even though Joe Smith is out. This is EXACTLY what happened last week. WOODSON WILL REVERT BACK TO HIS OLD SELF AND I AM 100 % OF THIS. HE WILL NOT USE THE BENCH WHICH WILL BE THIS TEAM’S DOWNFALL COME APRIL.

Also, Toronto has played better lately.

WOODSON, USE THE BENCH TONIGHT. DO NOT RUN A 6.5 MAN ROTATION

Ken Strickland

December 11th, 2009
8:42 am

NUNNA YO BIZNEZZ-your latest comments are erie because I started to post the same basic reply to his stupid comments. Is that his idea of establishing confidence in a young player, especially one that hasn’t had one min of PT since last yr. YOU GET ONE CHANCE AND ONE CHANCE ONLY TO GIVE ME EVERYTHING I’M LOOKING FOR OR YOU’RE DONE.

That statement begs me to ask the following questions.

(1) Woodson has stated more than once that his philosophy is to go elsewhere to get what you wants if he doesn’t get it from a particular player. Well, does that mean when JJ and Bibby are dominating the ball and the OFF with ISO’s, one on one and hoisting ill advised 3’s, and you extend their mins and refuse to use your bench when they do it, does that mean they’re giving you what you want?

(2)When the OFF noticably slows down and struggles to score, and both JJ and Bibby are struggling to hit their outside shots, does your habit of playing them extended mins in this situation mean they’re giving you what you want?

It appears that whenever this situation happens you always seem to limit bench use and ride the backs of the culprits. IS THAT REALLY CONSIDERED GOOD COACHING?

Have you noticed how some of the Woody lovers are quick to make an issue of anyone that points out the obvious flaws in Woody’s coaching philosophy, approach towards developing young players, limited OFF,as well as limited use of strategy, adjustments and bench? Have you also notice how they are quick to address only the fact that you’re complaining or stating an observation, but are very careful and deliberate in not addressing the actual complaint or observation itself. There’s never any, YOU ARE WRONG AND HERE’S WHY, or NO REFUTING THE STATS OR FACTS presented by presenting anything other than “BUT WE’RE WINNING or OUR RECORD IN 15-6.

They use the old childish approach, which like encountering a person that has a booger hanging from his/her nose and you simply point it out. Instead of thanking you and correcting the problem, they become embarrassed and start making derogatory remarks about you for bringing it to their attention.

Ignoring issues just because you’re winning can end up having longterm effects. Last yr Cleveland led the NBA with 66 wins and only 16 loses. They were dismantled and embarrassed by the Magic, who took advantage of their major weakness. They failed to address that problem and have already lost 7 or their first 22gms because other teams are now taking advantage of their unaddressed weaknesses.

The HC’s of the better NBA teams know when they play the Hawks, Woodson has a tendency to shorten his rotation, slow the OFF down, go perimeter and allow JJ and Bibby to dominate the ball and the OFF. They counter by using their bench liberally to wear down our starters and save their starters for a strong 4th qtr push. They also make an obvious effort to double JJ to either get the ball out of his hands or force him to run out the clock pounding the ball trying to beat the double teams. WOODY ROUTINELY MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO ADJUSTMENTS AND HIS HAREM WANTS EVERYONE TO PRETEND IT’S NOT AN ISSUE SINCE WE STILL MANAGE TO HAVE A WINNING RECORD.

Come playoff time, we’re going to end up being a lessor version of what Cleveland was last yr and suffer the same fate because Woody and his harem refuse to see the forest for the trees.

I remember before the season started when our friend SAMUEL stated that the Hawks weren’t in the same league with Cleveland, Orlando and Boston. Cleveland is really struggling, especially against lesser teams, because like most of you Woody lovers, they chose to ignore their weaknesses. And like us, the team is carrying the HC and winning in spite of him. DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR?

RLP

December 11th, 2009
8:58 am

With Orlando’s lost last night and a tough game on the road against Phoenix, a team that is 7-0 at home this year, it is possible at the end of the evening the Hawks could be tied with the Magic for first in the division and second in the East! I agree with those that point to a tough stretch in January. That is why December is so important to the Hawks. If they can win a bunch of these games going into the tough stretch they their confidence will rise which will help sustain them later on.

Will they be able to overcome the lack of consistency that saw them lose to teams they should have beaten? Will a good stretch here help them defeat the Cavs? Think what a confidence builder winning a home and home against one of the East’s so-called elite would do for their psyche.

I have always advocated that teams should not get too high after a big win nor too low after a bad loss. I especially think that is true for a veteran team. So far this year the Hawks seem to have embraced that attitude. Sure they lost a game that should never have been lost to the Knicks but then they were able to turn it around the very next night against a team they had not defeated in several years and who is a definite contender in the West the very next evening.

Sure they had a series of games where they did not play up to expectations. But their mental toughness prevented them from allowing the team to get down after those losses and start changing things around. I think the team can use these games in December to prepare for a tough January. What they do in the next few games could give them the confidence to use that time in January to make a statement that these birds can fly this year.

But even if they do not make that statement this year’s team has already exhibited a level of maturity beyond anything in their near pass. I have no doubts that this year’s team will be better than last year’s team and be a solid, established Big Four Eastern power. But I also think it is possible that this year can be one of those dream years that fans will remember forever. In either event this year is going to be a special one for the team and for us as fans.

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
9:03 am

Geez guys… the sky is not really falling. Outside of Orlando, Boston and Clevland are very beatable. And, really do you guys think Stan Van Gundy is a better coach than Woody? (For those with an obvious agenda, I already know the answer)

OK, I am going to say something here that I thought I would NEVER say.
Randolph Morris may be a good option off the bench tonight. (I think I just threw up in my mouth a little).
He has actually showed some fluidity and toughness in his limited minutes. Now, this my just be a figment of playing next to Collins, who makes my game look like Hakeem’s. With Joe Smith out, I would rather see Randolph than Hunter. Toronto’s interior is like a wet paper bag on defense and he could bring some toughness to the second unit to make up for the loss of Joe Smith.

*I really can’t believe I have said good things about Randolph, but I did. I guess the Christmas spirit is hitting early this year.

Mychelfromatl

December 11th, 2009
9:03 am

Oh my!!!! The Hawks may just go to the Finals this years. You heard it here first!

The reason being is the Hawks are about to get snubbed for the All-Star game. These dudes gonna be pissed!!!

As of today, no Hawk would make the NBA All-Star game SMH.

Josh Smith is the closest to making the All-Star game and he is 5th in voting among fowards in the East SMDH. ALSO A MAJOR SMH AT TRACEY MCGRADY MAKING THE ALL STAR TEAM!! Here how the voting is currently going:

Eastern Conference

Forwards: LeBron James (Clev) 649,327; Kevin Garnett (Bos) 533,187; Chris Bosh (Tor) 303,550; Paul Pierce (Bos) 131,379; Josh Smith (Atl) 109,404; Danny Granger (Ind) 100,122; Andre Iguodala (Phi) 75,146; Michael Beasley (Mia) 58,461; Hedo Turkoglu (Tor) 55,416; Rashard Lewis (Orl) 46,073; Luol Deng (Chi) 37,428.

Guards: Dwyane Wade (Mia) 672,227; Vince Carter (Orl) 292,002; Gilbert Arenas (Was) 212,526; Ray Allen (Bos) 208,276 Derrick Rose (Chi) 196,059; Allen Iverson (Phi) 136,976*; Joe Johnson (Atl) 118,964; Rajon Rondo (Bos) 113,371; Jose Calderon (Tor) 68,084; Mike Bibby (Atl) 48,935.

Centers: Dwight Howard (Orl) 625,279; Shaquille O’Neal (Cle) 206,657; Andrea Bargnani (Tor) 67,310; Al Horford (Atl) 52,747; Andrew Bogut (Mil) 45,920; Brook Lopez (NJ) 39,420; Jermaine O’Neal (Mia) 38,956; Rasheed Wallace (Bos) 36,855; Kendrick Perkins (Bos) 19,408; Brad Miller (Chi) 17,188; Tyson Chandler (Cha) 14,062; Samuel Dalembert, (Phi) 13,969.

Western Conference

Forwards: Carmelo Anthony (Den) 588,958; Dirk Nowitzki (Dal) 366,300; Pau Gasol (LAL) 280,758; Tim Duncan (SA) 271,321; Kevin Durant (OKC) 177,205; Trevor Ariza (Hou) 168,167; Shawn Marion (Dal) 161,653; Luis Scola (Hou) 134,321; Ron Artest (LAL) 99,209; Lamar Odom (LAL) 85,817; LaMarcus Aldridge (Por) 70,588.

Guards: Kobe Bryant (LAL) 692,518; Tracy McGrady (Hou) 281,545; Steve Nash (Pho) 272,135; Chris Paul (NO) 248,049; Jason Kidd (Dal) 207,247; Jason Terry (Dal) 131,422; Aaron Brooks (Hou) 131,167; Chauncey Billups (Den) 112,509; Brandon Roy (Por) 106,416; Deron Williams (Utah) 94,715; Manu Ginobili (SA) 75,392.

Centers: Amar’e Stoudemire (Pho) 447,776; Andrew Bynum (LAL) 299,484; Nene (Den) 90,439; Marc Gasol (Mem) 75,765; Greg Oden (Por) 73,874; Al Jefferson (Min) 48,676; Antonio McDyess (SA) 46,323; Mehmet Okur (Utah) 35,606; Marcus Camby (LAC) 35,471; Andris Biedrins (GS) 28,287; Emeka Okafor (NO) 19,827; Spencer Hawes (Sac) 10,733.

*While Allen Iverson appears among Western Conference guards on the paper ballot because he began the season with Memphis, his votes will count toward the Eastern Conference guards due to his signing with Philadelphia Dec. 3.

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
9:05 am

RLP- excellent post. Here, here.

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
9:06 am

Mychel- thank goodness the players and coaches get to vote. The fan voting is beyond embarrasing.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
9:33 am

Fun stats

If we compare 2008 with 2009. 21 game average vrs 2008 82 game average.

Turn over +1.5
1.5 x 21 games = 31.5 extra possessions
Assist +1.5
1.5 x 21 games = 62 pt’s? Have no Idea how many of these assist were 3 pt makes or shots with and and ones.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
9:42 am

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
9:06 am

The fan voting is beyond embarrasing.

McGrady? Allen Iverson, Shaq – Mercy They should have a game played requirement.

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
9:58 am

Astro Joe,

I agree that Teague is our 4th PG. However, my concern is if Bibby gets hurt (especially for an extended period of time). Do we start Crawford at PG? And if we do, who becomes our scorer off the bench? And do you really want Crawford having to look for his shot and run the offense?

Or would we start Teague at PG? Keep in mind that although he averages 9 mpg, there have been probably 10 games or so where he has received less than 5 mpg. What can we realistically expect out of him?

I’m just concerned that he is on the same road that Acie Law was on. The good thing is there are a lot of games left in the season, so Woody still has time to get the young fellow more PT.

I think the game tonight will be a lot closer than the last meeting. Especially if Toronto is knocking down 3’s. If our 3’s are not falling, I hope the Hawks will drive to the paint, because they cannot handle Josh and Al.

I also think RandMo is a better option than Hunter off the bench. I dont know if I would want him in the game at the same time with ZaZa though. If you play with him Al, then you can play RandMo at center or PF.

Grandad

December 11th, 2009
10:06 am

tyger:
I do not think N.O. would part with Paul w/o Josh or Al being in the conversation.

darrell starks:
Start thinking; Joakim Noah, as a possible alternative to AB. Chicago’s season is in disarray, maybe we could make the heist. We would have to take on a salary [dump] to make it work. I love the kids energy and motor. Plus he got under LBJ’s skin. Sorry if some of this is a repeat.
Blog monster has been grabbing some of my stuff, so I’m not exactly sure what made it through and what didn’t. I must admit that I am
technology impaired.

Kudos to ‘K.S.’ – keep bangin’ away. I’m with you on Marv, amongst most other points as well.

Marv was not drafted to be a role player. he also was drafted [2] not [3] if memory serves. He was drafted to be the next KG. That was never going to happen as he did not have the size nor athleticism. I still remember BK and or MW saying that he was not as athletic as they thought
when he was brought in for a w/o. However, he is a great kid who accepts his role. Had we not brought in Joe; his role would be completely different as well as his perception.

K.S.:
I would still like to enhance Al’s production, perception,and productivity by getting the defensive middleman I covet. J.Noah is on my new wishlist. Instead of being undersized and *overachieving[Al/Josh/size] on a nightly basis, I have a vision of being equal
to or overmatching the opponent [size] and still *overachieving.
*better athlete/energy/hustle/outrunning/outworking/etc.
**Josh and Al certainly bring these attributes to the table.

Occasionally you guys may see a post by ‘Grandad’. If it contains
cursing and or vulgarity, then it is not the real Grandad. Please attempt to discern between the two. No, I’m not bipolar, that I know of anyway. Ms. Grandad called me a moron the other day but I don’t think they’re the same thing.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
10:11 am

Randmo deserves minutes. Can’t say it enough. Can’t believe I keep saying it! It makes me smile every time. He can prove his worthy by helping to contain Bosh tonight who will retaliate with a monster game. They’re gonna play hard after what we did to them. It’ll be a tough game. Hoepfully we play our game and smash them again.

All Star voting won’t matter. It’s what the coaches decide with the real All-Stars that’ll come into play. I honestly hope our boys get snubbed to #1 give them much needed rest, and #2 to light a fire that’ll burn well into the playoffs. If we roll in with some fire till June they’ll be voted in next year.

Folks gotta see us to know us? How have we performed in our nationally televised games? Don’t mention Boston a few years back to justify it either. We’ve choked most every time we got a chance to really prove we have 1st tier players and a 1st tier team. Everyone doesn’t watch Fox Sports South.

Rufus1

December 11th, 2009
10:41 am

Not a Woodson Lover

I have noticed over the years that the hawks win totals have increased with the aquisition of veteran talent and not the development of young talent. Can anyone give me any significant improvement in any of our young players game…other than Marvin and some on this blog thinks he is a BUM or Clown.

I KNOW WE ARE WINNING, BUT CAN ANY OF TELL ME WE ARE WINNING BECAUSE OF HIM OR THE VETERN TALENT. I KNOW HE HAS NOT DEVELOPED A PG AND IT’S BEEN 6 YEARS. COLLISON AND MAYNOR WERE DRAFTED AFTER TEAGUE AND BROOKS WAS DRAFTED 21…ARE WE JUST DRAFTING THE WRONG PEOPLE. . I AM OPEN MINDED….PLEASE CHANGE MY MIND ABOUT WOODSON.

Ken Sugiura

December 11th, 2009
10:52 am

a lot of excellent takes here. i’m glad we’re off (at least a little bit) the Woodson is a bum/Woodson is a genius rants.
I’d say this about Marvin. I think at this point, you have to forget that he was a No. 2 pick and forget who was drafted after him. Those are sunk costs. I think you just have to deal with who he is and work from there.
O’Brien – I don’t think Woodson knows if he would start Teague or Crawford. When Bibby was hurt in New Orleans, I don’t think he’d made up his mind when Bibby decided he could go. And this is a copout answer, but I think it would probably depend on how far Teague had gotten, who the other PG is, etc. My guess, though, is that it’d be Teague, but Woodson would keep a close eye on him.
For what it’s worth – I thought this was interesting. Woodson almost never says anything to players coming off the floor after a substitution, but at some point Wednesday Teague came off, and Woodson encouraged him and a slap on the butt. Woodson’s ability to develop point guards is up for debate, but I don’t doubt him when he says he sees his potential and wants to get him in the game.

It’s fun to talk about, but I can’t see the Hornets trading Paul. Look at it from New Orleans’ perspective. I don’t think there’s anyone on the Hawks roster that would appease fans if the Hornets traded Paul.

KevinA – good crunching. I think one thing that has been overlooked (including by me) is the turnovers. It means a lot more possessions than the other team, and turnovers obviously lead a lot of times to fast breaks the other way. I’d be interested to see which group on the floor makes the most/least turnovers per minute.

As for Othello, I think as long as he defends and bangs, Woodson will be happy with him. He’d have to do a lot to unseat Collins, though. As wordsmithtom pointed out, Woodson knows what he has in him. If he was the more useful piece to the team at this point, he’d be suited up.

Ken Sugiura

December 11th, 2009
10:54 am

and I’m not blocking anyone just because i don’t agree with them. i think i may have deleted one or two posts since i’ve started blogging, and that was for language.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
10:57 am

Who has improved? Marvin, Chills, Josh, ZaZa, Flip and Al. Jamal is also playing under the Woody system than for other coaches or systems so far. JJ is now a three time All-Star under the Woody system.

You can be the Judge of how well Woody has done. Was it the organic growth or coaching or both. Should they be better? or are they on track. Clearly 47 wins are more than 13. Did you just start following the Hawks?

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
11:02 am

Ken- Othello is not going to unseat Collins, because they don’t play the same position. Hunter is 3/4 and Collins is just a lumbering 5. The position in question is really Randolph Morris’s as the 3rd pf off the bench.

Ken Strickland

December 11th, 2009
11:06 am

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
11:14 am

Speaking of developing players, why don’t we feed the ball to Al more. As we play some of these weaker teams this would be the perfect time to work on some post moves. If we gave up a few 3pt shots per game and fed the ball to Al it would not only get him more comfortable with his post moves but prob get Josh a couple more rebounds. Hard to think it would hurt the team FG%.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
11:16 am

Ken Strickland ,

yes?

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
11:17 am

If we move Collins to the all you can eat seats it’ll hopefully give him a wake-up call. Hunter has some passion. He wants to make it in the league. He’s gonna give what he’s got every night. I say suit him up instead of Collins. Use he and Randmo more and see what happens. Give them each 3-5 minutes per game in a solid segment. None of this last minute crap. Give them enough time to at least begin to get a sweat going. They can’t screw up that badly that fast. Both kids have earned at least a few minutes in the next 5-6 games. Especially since the games are sub 500 teams.

Collins doesn’t deserve a spot at the present time. Get him on a diet, strength and cardio regimine and work him back into uniform in March. That way he’s an effective piece for the playoffs. Till then develop the two that might be here in 5 years.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
11:18 am

Definitely agree with Kevin A about feeding Al more!

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
11:20 am

Fundamentals- what has Othello done to “deserve” playing time? Are you going to practice?

Rufus1

December 11th, 2009
11:30 am

KevinA

I have been a Hawks Fan since 2000. The players you are refering to are all 5 and 6 year players. Now look at some of the players drafted with them and some players development after 2 or 3 years and how they are doing(Deng, Iguodola, Brooks, Rondo, Roy, Devin Harris, Gay and Stuckey). None of the players we have drafted have come close to being an allstar.

To Recap 6 years of coaching, 5 TOP 12 DRAFT PICKS AND 3 high priced free agent = 50wins

IT IS JUST HARD FOR ME TO BELEIVE THAT SOMEONE ELSE COULD NOT HAVE DONE BETTER OR CAN DO BETTER.

Numberonehawksfan

December 11th, 2009
11:37 am

I don’t know why everyone keeps with all of the “is Al Horford a center talk”. Why does everything have to be so prototypical? There are only a few bona-fide “centers” in the NBA and why trade hustle and athleticism for some (generally) slow player that either slows down a running team or in Cleveland’s case, disrupts your offensive players from getting points in the paint. I like the idea of having 4 quick and talented players on the floor and run Boston and Cleveland in the ground. I clearly see Orlando as the best team in the East and if the Hawks play up to their capability, they will match up very well with the Magic. There are only two centers in the NBA that I would take over Horford and that’s Dwight Howard and Will Bynum and no I didn’t forget Shaq or Perkins…GO HAWKS!!!

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
11:38 am

Rufus- Are you seriously suggesting that the list you just gave represents players who are better and more accomplished than Josh and Al? You actually used Deng? He makes Marvin look like a consistent player.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
11:42 am

Hunter is young and hungry. He played well in the preseason. He’s done well whenever we had to use him. Given what Collins has presented who would you feel is more deserving of a shot? Either get Collins in game shape or put him in a suit. At least Othella is in game shape and ready to play! What is your response to that argument?

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
11:45 am

Has Bynum really proven he’s a better piece than Horford?

I like Dwight and Brooke Lopez from what I’ve seen so far. Hated Brooke’s attitude on draft day, but he seems to be a monster in the making regardless of their record.

Numberonehawksfan

December 11th, 2009
11:47 am

@ Rufus, Obviously you haven’t been following the Hawks…Josh Smith, Marvin Williams and Josh Childress (no longer with the team) all developed as draft picks of the Hawks. Sure they missed with Acie Law and Sheldon Williams but they’ve done way better this decade than in the 90’s…Don’t know if they developed because of Woody or despite Woody but at the NBA level, coaches don’t really do as much development of high draft picks, the draft picks should really be responsible for their own progression and development. They are the ones being paid millions of dollars…Just my opinion…If you look at all of the best players, every off-season they add something to their game, i.e., Jordan and Kobe…

Numberonehawksfan

December 11th, 2009
11:53 am

@Fundamentals, Bynum and Horford could be a good argument…I think that Bynum’s size gives him a slight edge (very slight) over Horford and what Horford lacks in size, he more than makes up in intensity and leadership…

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
11:57 am

Fundamentals- I certainly think Collins has looked like garbage so far this season. But, He and Hunter play entirely different roles. Collins is a big 5 who is there to clog the lane and give some hard fouls. Hunter is smaller than Randolph Morris. He is really an NBA 3 with limited skills so he is in the front court to rebound against smaller power forwards.

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
11:58 am

OB, if memory serves me correctly, Darren Collison had not received a lot of PT prior to CP3’s injury. He struggled initially and then he started to perform. If Bibby goes down, I have no idea how Woody would handle it (personally, I would move Joe to PG and start Mo… keeping Jamal on the bench and keeping that open-3-point threat in the starting line-up). But hopefully, Teague would step-up to the plate like a pro. If I were the coach, I would probably give Teague 10 minutes in his first 20 games and then 12 in his next 20, 15 in the 3rd 20 and then depending on how things were going, adjust his PT for the final run. But personally, I doubt that I would get him up to 20 minutes on this team this year.

And player development is not nearly as important to me as team development. And yes, there is a difference. Team development is about how well a team defends, can they win in a grind-out style as well as in a shoot-out, how high/low they get off of a good/bad game, can they close out a tight game (on both sides of the court), etc. How many former Woody players have gone on to have stellar careers under different coaches? Did y’all know that Diaw only averaged double-digit points once while with Phoenix? Dude was making $10M/year while averaging around 11 points during his tenure as a Phoenix Sun. I haven’t checked on Acie since he went to the legendary Larry Brown, how is that working out? Is Salim in the league? Has Solo moved ahead of Tyler Hansbrough or is he again the 5th big man (but on a lottery-bound team)? Is Royal Ivey a rotational player in the league? Meanwhile, we’re on our way to a 50+ win season. Y’all can moan about individual player development and wonder if Solo would have been the next Marcus Camby or if Acie would become Baron Davis, I’m saving for 2nd round playoff tickets.

wordsmithtom

December 11th, 2009
12:03 pm

Have no beef with playing Hunter, but I’d rather have him spell at the 3 and let Marvin learn to bang ( He certainly has the Butt) or give RandMo some minutes at 4. I think that’s his ultimate position, and he has some midrange game. Not a bad sub for this game.

The suggestion of trying Hunter and if that doesn’t work, Marvin does make me wonder if Smith’s hand is hurt more than we realize.

Finally, I reitterate. I’m old school. Used to be, players didn’t come out of college until they were NBA ready. It was not Coach’s job to develop them. They decided to become pro, so they proved themselves as pro’s. Coach ain’t got no sugar tit…just a boot or a slap on the back for occasional encouragement.
I don’t see any problem with his treatment of Teague. Actually, he’s getting quality minutes considering the wealth of talent ahead of him. He’ll get his chances.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
12:07 pm

Numberonehawksfan I like your take and will agree. You can’t make Horford grow, but would you make the trade? LA does have alot of pressure, but I don’t think Will is the same on and off the court that Horford is. To me we’ve got the better kid. On the court I think they’re equal, but agree on your points.

Daniel – I don’t care about positions. I want active positive pieces we can use in a game. Collins has some work to do to win me over. Who do you want on the bench right now: Collins or Hunter?

Randmo can be a solid 3rd option in my opinion. Possibly 2nd option unless ZaZa shows some of the flashes of brilliance from past years. We need energy, rebounding and defense. Hunter, Randmo and ZaZa can bring it. Collins brings a lumbering rusty body. He can’t bring the speed on D to even clog the middle effectively based on what we’ve seen in the ATL. Elsewhere yes, here no.

Rufus1

December 11th, 2009
12:07 pm

Daniel

The point that I was making is that in the 6 years that Woodson has been coach, some of the players have surpassed our player(Devin, Roy, Rondo and Iguodola)and some are equal in a shorter amount of time(Brooks and Stuckey). Josh Childress and Josh Smith was drafted in the same year as Harris, Iguodola and Deng. Deng is comming off a major injury, but career average is 17pts and 8rbs. Horford is the 2nd best player in his draft and I love Josh now. I am asking you to look at there develop and the time it took the to get there.

ROY AND HARRIS ARE MORE ACCOMPLISHED.

DANIEL THIS IS THE 1ST YEAR PORTLAND HAD A HIGH PRICED FREE AGENT, THEY WON 54 GAMES WITH THERE DRAFT PICKS…….

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
12:11 pm

Rufus1,

In a recent post I mentioned that Woody was not the smartest brick in the pile but no way the dumbest. Are there better coaches in the league? I would say yes. At the same time did Flip and Crawford play better in our system than they played in other systems?

Has Al and Josh improved every year? Will they continue to improve over the next two? I think yes.

I just don’t have the cut and dried attitude about Woody like some do – either good or bad.

Woody developing players is far down on my list. ISO, ball movement and better balanced scoreing is more of a priority to me. Like benching JJ/Jamal every time they take a quick jumper after an ISO. On my list of gripes we are doing better at all of them. So I give Woody some credit. Could he do better in my opinion? of course. At the moment a top 5 team in the League deserves some credit.

I like Woody better than Gundy, they have a better team and record. I like Adelman better than Woody and they have a worse record.

What can I say, we live in a mixed bag world and the Hawks are no different.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
12:14 pm

I don’t really consider Juwan and Andre Miller high priced free agents. Decent pieces, but don’t water down the Portland team with those picks. Think about how far they’d be without injury?

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
12:17 pm

Whats the diff between a golf ball and an Esclade?
Tiger can drive a golf ball over 400 yards………

Did u hear about Mrs Woods’s new line of golf clubs?
The advertising line will be ‘ With these clubs, I beat Tiger woods

what is the diff between Tiger Woods and Santa Claus??
Santa stops after 3 Ho’s

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
12:22 pm

AJ,

I would not give Teague 20 mpg either. What I would give him is 10-14 minutes EVERY game. But there are games where he plays well, only to have a DNP CD the next game, and then 5 minutes the next game after that.

I know it should be about matchups, but there are games where Bibby isnt getting it done, but he still plays 36 mins and Teague doesnt see the court, (eg, Bibby only played 5 minutes against the Hornets because he was hurt,), but yet Teague barely played, and we still lost those games. I know its still early though, and Woody talks highly of Teague, so thats good.

KevinA,

I agree. The Hawks are shooting 33.8% from 3 (JJ is at 27.7%, and Crawford shoots 31%). And one reason is because we take a lot of bad shots. Shots where there was enough time on the shot clock where we could pass the ball around and try to get a better shot. Or shots where players were settling for the 3, instead of driving the ball, or dumping it inside.

If the shot is in rhythym, or you’re open, take it. But if it isnt falling, look for the drive, or pass it around. To piggy back off your comments, I think we should try to establish Al and Josh in the first half of every game, and that would open it up for JJ to take over in the 4th.

JeJe

December 11th, 2009
12:47 pm

I know exactly what will happen tonight:
It’s the same thing as last week. We won a big game mid-week (this week it was Chicago — last week it was Toronto). Tonight it will be a tough game in a very hostile environment. Woodson will ABANDON everything that went right the other night, including his rotations. He will NOT use RandMo or Collins even though Joe Smith is out. This is EXACTLY what happened last week. WOODSON WILL REVERT BACK TO HIS OLD SELF AND I AM 100 % OF THIS. HE WILL NOT USE THE BENCH WHICH WILL BE THIS TEAM’S DOWNFALL COME APRIL.

Also, Toronto has played better lately.

WOODSON, USE THE BENCH TONIGHT. DO NOT RUN A 6.5 MAN ROTATION

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
1:12 pm

Kevin A- I like the Santa Claus joke.

Fundamentals- Well, I care about positions. If you are saying this from a position of “stick it to Collins” Light a fire under him, by bringing on Hunter instead. Ok, I will bite for a game or so. But, I would strongly disagree that Othello is some diamond in the rough just waiting for playing time.

Rufus- If you think Harris and AI are more accomplished than Al and Josh, then we have VERY different opinions about how this season has been going. You are aware that Josh and Al are playing All Star level ball, Josh is in the running for DPOY.

Rufus1

December 11th, 2009
1:26 pm

Daniel & KevinA

I think you both make very good point…I will give Woody credit and this year to make me a believer, because I really want this team to succeed.

Daniel- I agree this year Al and Josh are doing very well, my only gripe is the time it has taken for Josh.(AL was NBA ready) Also PG in my opinion is the most important position in the current NBA.

It is nice to be one of the better teams in the league…..GO HAWKS

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
1:35 pm

Daniel – I wouldn’t say Hunter is a diamond in the rough. He’s just something productive compared to something unproductive. If I had it my way I would’ve signed Mario ahead of Hunter and given Siler a shot. No one could question Mario’s heart and effort. He also did alot to add to team chemistry. Collins needs a fire lit. He used to be a nice piece for other teams. We’ve got a good shot. What’s wrong with the dude?

cp

December 11th, 2009
1:40 pm

I dont think Teague should start but its clear that Bibby is hurt right now so I don’t see how increasing Teague’s minutes would be a problem. Bibby was limping around on the court the other night. I would rather see the younging play more than see Bibby struggling out there to even jog up the court. And Collins sucks. The dude is out of shape. All he can give us is hard fouls. Hunter can come in and give fouls. Collins brings absolutely nothing to the table. The dude can barely run up the court, has a terrible fg percentage for a big man, and is once again terribly out of shape. Hopefully Hunter plays well enough to make Woodson think about letting Collins sit in a suit until he can get in some type of shape.

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
1:40 pm

Fundamentals- Ok, I get what you are saying. And, I have to say that I agree with you. Just because he is on the vet min. (btw so is Joe Smith) does he have to look and play like the Pilsbury Dough Boy? I know he is the 3rd center, but having an active, fit player in that role could be the difference in 3 to 4 games over the season, which is prob the difference between a 2cd and 4th seed.

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
1:41 pm

I will say that Hunter has NO chance of filling that role. Just doesn’t have enough size.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
1:59 pm

Definitely agree w/ you Daniel. I don’t care if Collins takes the 1st 3/4 of the season off. He’s gotta be ready to really bang and play well in the playoff’s to be of any value. Being fit now would’ve been an assett against Dwight.

We’ll need him for the Cav’s…but he won’t be ready. He’s hurting us. He might cost us a seed, which to me isn’t as big a deal. More importantly he’ll cost us by not being ready for the playoff’s which is the million dollar vet min question. We’re getting value out of Joe Smith. I’m loving him. I just wish Collins had the same level of professionalism. What is he teaching our younger kids? Nothing good from what I can see. He’s not good for our bench. Get him outta there.

Othello can maybe play limited minutes at the 3, but at least he’ll be active and filling a role. Maybe he’ll suprise us. Maybe he’ll end up back in the D-League where he probably belongs. At least there is some mystery.

Collins performance the other night left me thinking – I know I could’ve done better than that myself! I get pissed every time I see him!

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
2:06 pm

Fundamentals- your feelings are the same ones that I have had with Randolph Morris for the past two seasons. He actually made me angry to see him in uniform.

Dom 'the Don' Wilkins

December 11th, 2009
2:09 pm

I’m not sure that I understand why everyone says that Collins and the other pine heaters need to be ready come playoff time. Come on, do you really think with the way Woody rotates players in tight games, that you will ever see these guys take off the sweats in the playoffs? Remember what coach we are talking about here.

And that is not a knock on Woody, it’ just the truth. We won’t be needing Collins come playoff time.

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
2:49 pm

Injuries in the playoffs killed us last year. Did you watch the playoffs last year? Weren’t guys like Joe Smith & Ben Wallace killing us against the Cavs? If we have any injuries to our bigs then folks like Collins, Randmo & ZaZa become critical to us becoming contenders instead of pretenders like last year in the 2nd round.

Whether Woody uses them or not will most likely affect his next contract after the playoffs are over.

We will be needing every piece on our bench to be competitive in the 2nd round or further! It’s critical!

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
3:11 pm

Fundamentals- I am not sure also if our 11/12 players will be critical in the playoffs. If they are, we are likely to lose. But, I will say that they can add the kind of depth to win in the doldrums of the season. Which can affect seeding, I happen to think the seeding is very critical to our playoff success or failure.

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
3:17 pm

If every player gets 20 minutes to be ready for the playoffs, we won’t make the playoffs because very player doesn’t deserve 15-20 minutes each and every game.

Let Bacon Jason burn off his weight in practice and let Hunter get a little PT while Joe Smith is out (little as in 5-8 minutes).

Fundamentals

December 11th, 2009
3:24 pm

I can agree with all that. I never said give them all 20 minutes like it’s church league. Give me a break. We do need quality bigs for banging in the playoffs should someone get hurt.

All I mean if if we’re doing well, putting away teams like we should then there’s no reason to give Othello, Randmo or Collins minutes.

Othella will 99% sure be a D-League player by seasons end.

Randmo will hopefully fight for the #2 Center spot if he continues to progress.

Collins needs to go home.

You can’t tell me the last guys on the bench aren’t important to our team in terms of practice competition, playoff emergencies and overall depth.

If each of the three in disussion could produce like Joe Smith has for us we’d be much better in terms of W/L, seeding and playoff strength.

Ken Strickland

December 11th, 2009
3:55 pm

KEVINA-I started to respond to your comments, but had to break it off when my big girl insisted she had to go outside to use the bathroom. After returning sometime later, I saw the comments by RUFUS1 and realized he pretty much summed up everything I was going to say.

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
4:00 pm

Fundamentals, you could give RndMo 40 minutes a game for the next 40 games and he will not likely be as good of a player as Joe Smith. The notion that playing time produces a more productive player is a falacy. There are other variables like talent, work ethic and basketball intelligence that come into play as well. What happens in the first quarter of the season won’t likely mean a lot in terms of what happens in games 83 and beyond. Lastly, if player A is missing shots, making poor defensive rotations and is fumbling balls off his hands routinely during practices… should that factor into his playing time in real games? Is there even the slightest chance that a coach would use practice sessions to determine playing time allocation (especially for younger players or those who devour triple bacon cheeseburgers before, during and after practice)? Or should a coach ignore practice performance and hand out 12-20 minutes of PT like handing out smarties to children?

Daniel

December 11th, 2009
4:28 pm

Astro- I am going to have to defend fundamentals here. I don’t think he was calling for Randolph or Hunter to play more minutes, etc. Just that Collins has looked soooo bad in his limited minutes that he either needs to get with it or get on. And that our 3rd center’s effort does have an effect on the team, and right now Collins is giving us nothing.

I hope I said what you meant fund. I don’t think he meant that Randolph or Collins or Hunter were going to be significant minutes/contribution guys. Rather Collins wasn’t giving us any amount of acceptable performance.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
4:42 pm

I have not seen Rand Mo play enough to make any kind of decesion. He has looked pretty good in garbage time against the ends of other teams benches but has yet to be played when the games outcome is still in question.

I would like to see him play at least a couple of times agains the starters to get a better picture of where he is at.

Al can play the 4 spot and ZaZa should be plenty fresh. In fact I would like to see Al pulled after 5 min so he could have some playing time with Teague in the second unit. All they have to do is get Jamal to run and not many teams could catch us.

Ken Strickland

December 11th, 2009
4:45 pm

Why all of the concern about OHunter replacing JCollins on the bench. After all, didn’t he suit up last yr and sit on the bench, only to get ignored by Woody? What difference does it make if he’s talented, athletic and energetic if he’ll never get a chance to utilize any of those attributes. Besides, he’s a young player that needs time, attention and mins to develop, and we all know what that means when it comes to Woody.

The Lakers drafted Bynum and had Kareem work with him DURING THE SEASON. They didn’t wait until the off season for him to find someone to help him improve his game on his own like we’ve done with Horford, Smoove and Marvin. They also made a conscience effort to CONSISTENTLY include Bynum in their OFF, and he’s responded to the tune of 18PPG.

I good HC consistently works at developing a young player during the season by trying to incorporate he and his talents into the OFF and the rotation as quickly as possible. Woodson hasn’t tried to do that since Marvin was drafted. Once he got his vets and core in place, he abandoned any pretense of trying to develop anybody.

Woodson’s OFF is so limited overall that certain players who don’t have the ability to go one on one, or consistently create their own shots, are up and down from gm to gm depending on who they’re playing. His OFF isn’t capable of consistently getting easy shots for his players. Other than when we’ve played in Seattle or Portland, can anyone really say they’ve observed a single gm where Woodson has made an effort to take advantage of any matchup advantages with Marvin?

Other than posting him up, can you say you’ve ever seen a single pick, play or formation incorporated into Woodsons limited OFF that’s designed to get Marvin an open shot. We see pick and rolls run for every starter except Marvin, and pick and rolls are very effective when both players are good outside shooters.

If you put this team in the hands of a HC that pays attention to details, isn’t afraid to utilize his bench or rookies, knows how to make adjustments and changes, especially during gms, and knows how to design an OFF that takes full advantage of the talents on this team, we’d definitely rule the East.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
5:24 pm

Hot damn! Astro Joe is back in da flow! :)

Who suggested they’d take Will Bynum for Al Horford? Sorry, but I can’t go for that at all. You never trade a double-double PF/C for a backup 6 foot guard. Now Andrew Bynum is a different story. Still not sure I’d do that trade, but at least it’s a center for a center, as it were…. :twisted:

E43

December 11th, 2009
5:28 pm

northcyde- im not taking anything of what i said earlier back about our 10 man rotation. the hawks have been solid deploying the 1st ten this year. im not complaining that that the 10th man doesnt get significant minutes, im just implying that the NBA has injuries and when they do occur God forbid at least the edges of our depth chart will be sharpened. the whole purpose of last offseason was to get a depth chart that wont change the starting fives minute times in the event of injuries to the bench or within the five.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
5:41 pm

Ken ,

Whose minutes do you suggest Othello Hunter take? Josh Smith, Al Horford, Joe Smith, or Zaza Pachulia? Unless dude is playing the 3 (and nothing about him convinces me he can do so), those are the four guys he has to be taking minutes from.

As for Woody’s offense….I agree that there are some problems there. I don’t want to get into too much detail on that opinion, but I will say this: We just took over third place in the Eastern Conference standings, ahead of the Cavs. Yeah, THOSE Cavs. The guys with Lebron and Shaq. Mo Williams, etc. That’s THREE all-stars. Our offense may not be as good as we want it to be, but 21 games in, and this is where we are.

Not only that, but we’re 6th in the NBA in points scored per game, trailing only Phoenix, Denver, Toronto, Golden State, and the L.A. Lakers. That puts us ahead of some pretty good teams and pretty good coaches. Out of those teams, only L.A. is clearly better than us. Phoenix is debatable, and Denver is too, if you ask me. Hey, we may not like everything we see, but something must be working, at least for now.

Of course, the other way of looking at it is to say “call me back in another 20 games, or after a key player goes down with injury.” Well, last I looked, that hurts most teams. Ask the Spurs. I don’t like the ISOs, but when we share the ball, we’re VERY hard to beat. That, and not everything is Woody. Sometimes our guards get too shot happy.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
5:45 pm

As for the whole thing with Marvin, I’m not sure what to say. On the one hand, Marvin doesn’t seem very good at creating his own shot, pick and roll or not. He needs the ball in flow/motion or as a spot up shooter, more often than not. Not saying he can’t create his own shot at all, just that he’s not as good at it as many of the other guys. Even Smoove seems more comfortable trying to make something happen.

No, we don’t run many plays for him. I really don’t know why for certain. At the same time, I don’t see Marvin doing anything that makes me want to take the ball out of JJ, Smoove, or Al’s hands. Or Crawford, when he’s on the floor. Well, not all the time, anyway. Sometimes I do really want to see Marvin get the ball, particularly when Joe is in a rut shooting and decision making. Marvin really isn’t that great on the pick and roll. I don’t know why. Maybe that’s why we don’t see him when that play is run.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
6:55 pm

LETS GET IT…

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:01 pm

iso Nique’

he’s never ready when Bob passes it to him….

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:18 pm

Stop giving the ball out soooo damn far

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:18 pm

Stop giving horford the ball out soooo damn far

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:21 pm

Hawks look sluggish or a step slow to start the game…

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:26 pm

Here we go with this sh*t

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
7:26 pm

can we please trade marvin

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:27 pm

Oh great Woody give em more pts

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
7:29 pm

Marvin with the And 1

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:29 pm

PASS THE BALL!

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:29 pm

Even ttho Joe hit that. Whe is he hoggin the ball.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:30 pm

HELL OF A SHOT THOUGH…

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:30 pm

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
7:30 pm

Joe made it..but he dribbles himself into trouble too much…..

if the team isnt out on a fast break….joe doesnt trust his teammates..

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:33 pm

Josh can’t buy a bucket

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
7:33 pm

that was good d by horford

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
7:33 pm

And thats why Woody will let JJ do whatever he wants. Because even though JJ was being a ball hog, and had 2 defenders on him, and might have been fading away, he still made it. Heck of a shot.

Thats one of those “Bad shot, Joe”, and then it becomes “good shot Joe” when it goes in lol.

Hawks are 3-4 from 3. Thats a good sign.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:33 pm

Put Teague in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
7:34 pm

Frontcourt: 0-7
Perimeter players: 7-11

KevinA, where you at? ;)

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
7:34 pm

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:35 pm

great D Joe and Josh…

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:36 pm

Good drive Josh

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:36 pm

offensive foul…

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
7:37 pm

Best defensive rotations I’ve seen in awhile leading to that block by Josh. JJ doubled down, Bargnani made a great move, but Josh was waiting for him.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:38 pm

hmmm… nice shot

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
7:38 pm

boooo lucky shot

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
7:39 pm

Near-perfect D by Mo there – he had his hand right in front of Wright’s face, but Wright knocked it down anyway.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:39 pm

I like that way the Hawks end the 1st qtr by taking the lead after being down the majority of the qtr….

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
7:42 pm

If looks could kill, how many people would Woody have killed already lol

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:42 pm

Woody get that dumb look off your face

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:42 pm

take it to his weak ass Z…

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
7:42 pm

I’ll never understand the logic behind Woody’s rotations. He benches Josh when he’s tearing the place up and leaves him in when he’s 1-8…he’s playing good D but the man needs a rest.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:42 pm

wow.. what a catch… boy is an athlete…

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:43 pm

he heard you Nire…

Mychelfromatl

December 11th, 2009
7:43 pm

I don’t think Toronto wants to turn this into a track meet with the Hawks.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:43 pm

im really pleased with our rotation on D tonight… Raptors are making shots.. but im loving seeing hands up contesting…

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
7:44 pm

wow didnt teague get trip?

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:45 pm

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:45 pm

Yea boyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:45 pm

Yes, Hawks 2nd unit has coming in and extend the Hawks lead…

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:46 pm

See I told ya;ll Tgue would do good if you just give him mins

RaJaH

December 11th, 2009
7:46 pm

Nice pick and dish Teague!

Mychelfromatl

December 11th, 2009
7:46 pm

THE ROUT IS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
7:46 pm

This is exactly how Woody should be using Teague. The team is playing good D, and are pushing the tempo.

Needless to say, they push the ball more when Bibby is not in the game, because he usually walks it up.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:49 pm

good take…

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:50 pm

let em run Woody… keep them out there…

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:50 pm

Now Teague better get some major mins in the 2nd half

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:51 pm

Hawks 2nd unit is really playing well

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:52 pm

Jeff Teague is causing Havoc on defense…

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
7:53 pm

Ahmad Rashad at the scorers table talking to the dude with the bald head that usually sat next to Sekou…

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:53 pm

My goodness Teague is quick….

BONE

December 11th, 2009
7:56 pm

Teague should be starting soon.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
7:56 pm

Mo Evans is hot….

Mychelfromatl

December 11th, 2009
7:56 pm

Damn Moe. Hawks bench lookin deadly lately.

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
7:56 pm

looks like mo evans wants minutes also

The Hawksta

December 11th, 2009
7:57 pm

I see Mo has his shot back! Wow no d at all by Toronto

The Hawksta

December 11th, 2009
7:59 pm

Travel Turg! Refs bailed you out!

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
8:00 pm

.857 from deep. That’s just sick.

Raptors Fans

December 11th, 2009
8:01 pm

We’re actually contesting shots pretty well. Hand in the face and all. You guys just have our number I guess.

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
8:03 pm

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
8:04 pm

Small lineup again – Josh at center.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:08 pm

Joe coulda passed that back to Jamal

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
8:09 pm

LeBron or D-Wade gets a foul call on that play. Not sayin’ he shouldn’t have passedit. Just sayin’.

J.J.M.

December 11th, 2009
8:10 pm

lol they getting on the raptors on nba tv

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
8:10 pm

Again,

this is exactly what you get when you listen to local bloggers, fire a well respected coach and hire the team physician. Is this the “so-called” European style of play that’s supposed to be the wave of the future in the NBA? Yea, right.

Sund, get off your bald-headed as_ and give Woody a contract.

Woody=COY

Boy

December 11th, 2009
8:11 pm

good half. I wonder why the Hawks called a timeout and drew up a play for the last nine seconds. Iso Joe, again. Do you need to call a time out and draw up a play for that?

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:14 pm

Good 1st half by the Hawks. After a slow start, I thought the 2nd unit came in and played with energy that broke the game open for the Hawks to have double digit lead. Not much to complain about in the 1st half of basketball but I will say I wish Joe would realize that he doesnt have to force difficult shots when he goes to his Iso play….

cp

December 11th, 2009
8:18 pm

Good game so far. The bench has shown once again they can produce when given minutes. Teague is showing why his minutes should increase. He causes a lot of turnovers because of his long arms and quick hands. He is also very good at finding his teammates for open shots. And I love how he controls the tempo. Toronto might be the worst defensive team I have ever seen.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:22 pm

Jeff Teague>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Acie Law

Wabe

December 11th, 2009
8:25 pm

Good first half. Hope they can come out and put an early run together to start the 3rd as they did against the Bulls to put these Raptors away.

Teague’s got some quick hands.
Mo Evans isn’t afraid to shoot it, and he’s actually shooting well tonite.

Aside from JJ, the starting 5 hasn’t done much. But the bench play has been stellar to this point. Hope to see more minutes for those guys in this 2nd half.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:28 pm

See Joe needs to just pass it DAMNNNNNNNNN

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:28 pm

Joe pass the ball some, please..

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:28 pm

Joe Blew those last 2 possessions

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:28 pm

Nice first half, I have no complaints. JJ got it started, and the bench took it to the next level. Congrats to Woody for leaving the bench in. I thought the Hawks were just a 4th seed. This team can actually make some serious noise in the eastern conference. We finally have a bench; we have to dictate the pace and make the other teams react and adjust. When the defense is on, the offense is off the chain.

This is no longer JJ’s team; we ride and die with JSmash!!!!!!!!!

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:30 pm

PASS IT JOE DAMNNNNNNNNNNN

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:32 pm

Bibby hasn’t done anything.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:32 pm

I like Horford and even Pachulia’s “mid ranged” jumpers.

Here’s something I’ve always wondered, even though Josh Smith has backed off from firing those 3s, he still jacks up a good number of long 2s.

It’s either a long 2…or at the rim…

Why doesnt he try mid-ranged jumpers since the long 2s arent really for him just like the 3s??

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:34 pm

Marvin’s like “I cant believe I didnt fall”

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:35 pm

Mac- actually JSmash has been shooting more mid range jumpers this season.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:35 pm

Marvin knew he wasn’t gonna finish that lol. And Mac you are right. Josh just takes long 2s instead developing a mid-range shot.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
8:36 pm

iso Nique…

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:37 pm

Even though this is Smashes team; JJ is finally on fire this guy might be back.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:37 pm

Man get Bibby out

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:39 pm

Oh Nique with the heat check

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:40 pm

Damn a Heat Check LMAO!!!

2young2simple

December 11th, 2009
8:40 pm

bone ur pure SB, would u plz shut up 4 a little while

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:41 pm

Bone- you beat me to it.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:41 pm

Lacsho….nah that’s not what I see. I mean shots like barely beyond the the free throw line…or half way between the three and hoop from the sides.

Josh’s jumpers are still just within the 3 pt line..

He should take more jumpers from the range that Horford does…..

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:42 pm

2young2simple you can lick DEEZ NUTZ. Don’t read what I got to say then.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:42 pm

Toronto’s D is horrid.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:44 pm

Put Teague in again

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:45 pm

Some of the pre-season predictions I saw on different sites and mags had this cRaptors team as a higher playoff seed than us.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:45 pm

Will we see Teague in the 3rd quarter????? WWWD (What Will Woody Do)…

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:46 pm

You guys think Josh is makin the all star game this year?

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:46 pm

Mac- I agree he does take long two’s, but I’ve seen him take quite of few mid range shots.

Bone- Don’t get caught up with the alias’s.

Peace

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
8:46 pm

Watching the Raptors makes you start agreeing with Samuel. They are at least somewhat competitive without their overpaid, soft Europeans (as in players from Europe, not white people, so get off your racial high horse) on the floor. If I were their coach I would seriously consider starting Jarrett Jack and Sonny Weems over Jose Calderon and Hedo Turkoglu.

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:48 pm

No Doubt, the coaches will vote Smash in. The NBA fans are suspect, or maybe the NBA has a agenda?

Blast

December 11th, 2009
8:48 pm

3 turnovers for Joe!

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
8:48 pm

hmm… best wishes to coach Drew…

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:49 pm

Wow, Woody put Teague in the game during the 3rd qtr… Kudos Woody…

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:50 pm

Teague sighting!!!!

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:50 pm

What’s good my main man Melvin?

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:51 pm

This broadcasting crew fro the Raptors dont have a clue about basketball. They must be on loan from the Hockey team….

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
8:52 pm

WoW, on pace for a buck 30.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:54 pm

Lascho,

Just enjoying the winning ways the Hawks are having this season. It’s good to see ya back on a regular basis…

Blast

December 11th, 2009
8:56 pm

Another turnover for Crawford.

Teague is gonna be special.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
8:56 pm

I think we can expect more Teague sightings. I think he’s winning Woodson over.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
8:57 pm

Nice behind the back no look pass from Teague to Josh..

BONE

December 11th, 2009
8:57 pm

Teague should start

terrell barron

December 11th, 2009
8:58 pm

Teague looks so much more comfortable out there. Lookout!

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
8:58 pm

Rathbun took the words right out of my… uh, keyboard. Teague’s court awareness is getting better with every game. That pass in traffic maybe wasn’t the greatest of decisions, but a few weeks ago he may have tried to force that layup.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:00 pm

Nique said nimbers instead of numbers lol

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
9:01 pm

Mel- I’m trying to come back, sometimes this new blog gets really out of control.

Wabe

December 11th, 2009
9:02 pm

Lovin the way Teague’s coming along. Finally getting to showcase what he can do. He just reminds me of Rajon Rondo. Quick with the ball. He’s looking to dish the ball when it’s in his hands. We play at a much faster pace when he’s in the game. And he’s shown his quick hands with his steals many times this season.

Boy

December 11th, 2009
9:02 pm

Nique can’t say numbers, Bone. don’t know why.

Ken Sugiura

December 11th, 2009
9:04 pm

An impressive performance.

Teague 7 assists, 1 turnover. Not to beat a dead horse, but he looks really comfortable out there.
Hawks 23 assists on 38 baskets.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:04 pm

Teague just teeing em up…

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
9:04 pm

Damn, if he gets that floater in the lane down, Teague is gonna be a PROBLEM…

vava74

December 11th, 2009
9:05 pm

man… this kid is sick…

Mike Bibby's Thoughts

December 11th, 2009
9:05 pm

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:05 pm

21 pt lead with 6mins left in the 4th. I would like to see Randmo get some mins. Especially since the Raps have their starting frontline in the game..

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:05 pm

check him out…

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
9:05 pm

Wabe, Rondo is a great comparison, and the scary thing is Teague already shoots better than Rondo.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
9:06 pm

Teague is gettin it

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:06 pm

thats all he needs… a floater, pull up, and a lay up high off the glass…

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:06 pm

See Woody this is what happens when you let a rookie actually play.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:06 pm

Lascho,

Like Doc would say, just scroll until you see something worth commenting on…

terrell barron

December 11th, 2009
9:07 pm

I think we’ve found our pg.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:08 pm

If yall think Nique is bad, you should hear the Raps crew. Just terrible. No b-ball knowledge at all…

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:09 pm

big dave,

I think Teague has all those skills and more….

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
9:11 pm

Bigdave- I agree, the kid is nice.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
9:11 pm

He missed but that boy can get to that d-a-mn rim!!!

Ken Sugiura

December 11th, 2009
9:11 pm

Raptors’ lowest total at home this year is 94.

Boy

December 11th, 2009
9:11 pm

Raptors playing better D tonight.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:11 pm

Melvin… i dunno…

but he will… im sure he’ll get tired of getting his layup attempts blocked…

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm

Teague! Breaking ankles!

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm

lol….crunk

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm

My goodness Jeff Teague is putting on a show…

Wabe

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm

Teague!!!!!!

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm

Teague>>>>>>>>Any PG we’ve had in awhile

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm

he might have them in his arsenal but he needs to learn when to go them… thats why i said countless times, when he learns to use the high glass he’ll be dangerous…

vava74

December 11th, 2009
9:13 pm

this kid is dynamite!!!!

but hold your horses on the starting job talk… more minutes? yes, starting job? too early!

Blast

December 11th, 2009
9:13 pm

Teaguer is the Truth!

The Hawksta

December 11th, 2009
9:13 pm

Teague is using these dudes! This is probably what he does to Bibby every practice!

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:14 pm

* “when to go to them”

terrell barron

December 11th, 2009
9:14 pm

Shouldn’t have to worry about Teague gettin minutes anymore.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:14 pm

Naw if Bibby isn’t hitting shots he’s completely irrelevant.

JB

December 11th, 2009
9:15 pm

“They are at least somewhat competitive without their overpaid, soft Europeans (as in players from Europe, not white people, so get off your racial high horse) on the floor.”

I like how you put a disclaimer there to show your not racist only to expose it. Some of the toughest players in the NBA are Euros and maybe of the softest are Americans who only look or act like they’re tough.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:15 pm

i wanna see Othello work… ive seen Randolph’s improvements… lets see what Sekou was raving about… he said Thello was the most improved..

Wabe

December 11th, 2009
9:15 pm

Again…quick hands.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:15 pm

Jason STEAKS Collins lol

JB

December 11th, 2009
9:15 pm

Meant to say “many of”…

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:16 pm

man.. get the ball out of his hands…

give it to Randolph or Thello

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
9:17 pm

Ok, I’m feeling rather nice (Hawks + Drinky drank). Then I continue to watch Teague prove his case. Again, props to woodrow (aka bwaf, peace to manny Mr. T).

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
9:17 pm

Bibby and Marvin should both just be role players to come off the bench that can offer you a decent-to-good jumper (and a lil D in Marvin’s case)

I think Teague and Mo Evans would produce more than them if given the minutes….

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
9:18 pm

LMFAO…RANDMOOOO

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
9:18 pm

Yea,

Teague looks good but don’t get it twisted, Bibby and Co. built this lead. I hope Teague can do this against a team that actually plays defense so Bibby can get some rest. Good for him. Jason “Pigfoot” Collins in the game.

Woody=COY

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:18 pm

Calderon is a gritty player…

rms

December 11th, 2009
9:18 pm

LOL @ RandoMO!!

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:19 pm

LOL…. Randmo tried to reach back and dunk that one from New York…

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:20 pm

chalk up another on the road…

who is the guy in the turban? always at the Raps games… wasnt he in the ‘Welcome to Atlanta’ video at Walter’s?

Blast

December 11th, 2009
9:20 pm

Hawks taking major scalp on the road right here.

Pile up the wins!

Go Hawks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
9:21 pm

“like how you put a disclaimer there to show your not racist only to expose it. Some of the toughest players in the NBA are Euros and maybe of the softest are Americans who only look or act like they’re tough.”

1. Dirk
2. Zaza

Who else?

The reason I put the disclaimer on there is because I think the majority of white American players — David Lee, Kirk Hinrich, Chris Kaman, etc. — get unfairly stereotyped as being soft or unathletic because of the large numbers of Euroleague players in the NBA who just want to stand around and shoot 3’s all day and who refuse to play physical defense.

It is the European style of play, not genetics, that causes this. Obviously there are going to be exceptions to any rule, and nowhere did I say all American players are tough, but by and large there’s a huge dropoff in that department from American players to Euros.

JB

December 11th, 2009
9:21 pm

I don’t get this whole Woody debate. We’re a great team because its built very well and our core group is a perfect fit. Don’t forget that this same team was frustrating the hell out of us the last two years. Let’s give credit to Josh for upping his game and Sund and Knight for adding Bibby and Crawford. I don’t think this team lives and dies by Woody like some of you think.

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

December 11th, 2009
9:23 pm

Randmo tried to Sportscenter top 10 Bosh and got that sh*t sent to Windsor, Ontario.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
9:24 pm

Yeah, I’m not ready to hand Teague the starting job yet (after all these are the Raptors and it is garbage time) but I think with every game he’s showing he deserves 20 minutes per game. Bibby does a lot of intangible things like setting screens and throwing accurate passes that don’t show up in box scores but that keep the offense moving efficiently, and Teague hasn’t proven he can do those things on a regular basis. But between Joe Johnson, Bibby, Crawford, and Teague, I don’t think there’s a better and deeper backcourt in the league.

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:25 pm

Mac,

I dont know where Windsor located but I dang sho know that Bosh block that dunk out of the building…lol

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
9:26 pm

Can’t believe I’m saying this (choking), Good job ASG for keeping this core together. If we could get chillz on this team, it would be a wrap.

And I’m gone!!!

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
9:28 pm

Mack- LMAO!!!!!

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:28 pm

i think that its vital that our 2nd unit continues to defend well… lots of games are won and lost by 2nd unit contributions…

cp

December 11th, 2009
9:29 pm

This is the reason many of us have been calling for Teague to get more minutes. The kid is good at setting up his teammates, quick hands no defense, and can get to the rim at will. Like it has been said before, once he gets a floater he is going to be a problem… Actually the starters were not doing much it was the bench who took over the game in my opinion. The bench had more players in double figures than the starters.

cp

December 11th, 2009
9:31 pm

That should be quick hands on defense. And he has those long arms that disrupts a lot of passes.

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
9:32 pm

I think Teague deserves at least 10-14 minutes every game, regardless of the team that we’re playing. He should get lots of minutes against the Nets on Sunday.

Cleveland down by 8 at home to Portland. And lets hope Orlando loses in Phoenix.

Great win Hawks and Woody

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:32 pm

Lascho,

I also wonder what this team would look like if we could add Chills.

bigdave

December 11th, 2009
9:35 pm

aight.. coach does look like a potato head…

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
9:40 pm

Naj,

You can add “Barney” Bargnani to the list. He sets the tone for this team “jackin” up threes and playing “zero” defense.

You guys talk about Woody not being an offensive minded coach yet the Hawks are 6th in the league in offense behind some teams such as GS, PHX and Toronto(before tonight’s game)who play “zero” defense.

So, how can a man coach the team with the 4th best record in the entire league(which may change by the weekend) ,with the 3rd lowest payroll and one of the youngest and not be a dam_ good coach?

I think you guys are looking more and more stupid by the minute with your Woody Hate.

Woody=COY

Melvin

December 11th, 2009
9:41 pm

Man these Refs loves the Cavs…

O'Brien

December 11th, 2009
9:51 pm

Melvin, Lascho

If Chills was on this team, Woody would not know what to do lol.

Some teams (Lakers, Cavs, DWade, Celtics sometimes) seem to get all benefits of the doubt from the refs. Which is what I think Donaghy was talking about.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:53 pm

Hopefully Teague is Kevin Johnson 2.0

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
10:00 pm

BONE

December 11th, 2009
9:12 pm
Teague>>>>>>>>Any PG we’ve had in awhile

What if he contiues to do well and gets more minutes – good coaching or just JT doing well.

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:00 pm

Mel, O’Brien

Just think you don’t have to run plays for chillz, and he would clean up Crawfords shots, when he’s having a bad night. He would be a perfect mesh with this current roster.

Keeping it all the way real, when the first team is stalling,Woody should throw the second team in immediately.

Cp- your right about the second team. They really changed the pace, and this is not the first time.

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:01 pm

Kev- you got to remember Teague was a beast in college.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
10:02 pm

If JT has a bad game or two and his minutes drop off the chart – bad coaching or JT blowing his opporntunities.

BONE

December 11th, 2009
10:03 pm

KevinA I would only give woody credit if he gives Teague consistent mins. That would be good coaching. But I think Teague is just talented and that has nothing to do with Woody.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
10:03 pm

Lacsho,

Say we had lakers money, Chills replacing hunter would be nice pick up

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:04 pm

Hmmm, I say a rookie trying to find his way. This will be his rolla coaster year, however; you have to let him make mistakes, and find his way.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:04 pm

Another win, and on the road. Great contributions from our bench. Another blowout win. What’s not to like? I probably shouldn’t ask that question.

Anyway, things I enjoyed in this game:

1) Mike Woodson getting a technical foul. That was greatness. You go, Woody.

2) Mo Evans on fire.

3) Seemingly every Hawk out there trying to get their hands on the ball on defense…and succeeding quite often.

4) A blowout win that wasn’t a shootout (Toronto was held to 89 points).

5) Jeff Teague looking like an NBA point guard, rather than a #19 pick in his first year.

6) Joe Johnson looking like Joe Johnson.

7) Josh Smith recouping from a bad offensive game by collecting blocks, steals, rebounds, and assists.

8) The bench shooting better than 62% from the field, and contributing 55 of the total 111 points.

JB

December 11th, 2009
10:07 pm

Samuel and Najeh, how does one even define “tough”. It’s so subjective. When you say “soft Euro players who stand around and shoots 3s all day” it’s obvious you’re referring to white players. What about Ilyasova, Delfino, Kirilenko, Okur, both Gasols, Biedrins, Pietrus, Sefolosha, Parker, Deng, Gortat, Diaw, Turiaf, and many others who are very good defenders (team or individual) and tough players. Basically you guys have a problem with a small handful of tall white Euros who are good at shooting three pointers. Thats about as dumb as calling a good passer soft because he doesn’t “take initiative” and score by himself like a real tough non-European would. How come the tall white Europeans are soft but the many tall black non-European shooters like Lewis, Harrington, Frye, Sheed, Granger, are never called soft? At least the Euros that do it do it because they were brought up to play like that. The Americans who play like that have no excuse for having such a huge flaw in their game like being good at outside shooting.

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:09 pm

I feel you with the lakers money, but what if we keep Hunter, and loose Collins. He really looks out of place with this team.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:10 pm

Samuel ,

From my 5:41 post earlier this evening:

“As for Woody’s offense….I agree that there are some problems there. I don’t want to get into too much detail on that opinion, but I will say this: We just took over third place in the Eastern Conference standings, ahead of the Cavs. Yeah, THOSE Cavs. The guys with Lebron and Shaq. Mo Williams, etc. That’s THREE all-stars. Our offense may not be as good as we want it to be, but 21 games in, and this is where we are.

Not only that, but we’re 6th in the NBA in points scored per game, trailing only Phoenix, Denver, Toronto, Golden State, and the L.A. Lakers. That puts us ahead of some pretty good teams and pretty good coaches. Out of those teams, only L.A. is clearly better than us. Phoenix is debatable, and Denver is too, if you ask me. Hey, we may not like everything we see, but something must be working, at least for now.

Of course, the other way of looking at it is to say “call me back in another 20 games, or after a key player goes down with injury.” Well, last I looked, that hurts most teams. Ask the Spurs. I don’t like the ISOs, but when we share the ball, we’re VERY hard to beat. That, and not everything is Woody. Sometimes our guards get too shot happy.”

See? Not all as stupid as you think. I have to leave that COY with you, though. I love 16-6, but it’s too early for me to give the man that plaque. Besides, I think he wants a contract more ;)

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
10:13 pm

BONE

December 11th, 2009
10:03 pm
KevinA I would only give woody credit if he gives Teague consistent mins. That would be good coaching. But I think Teague is just talented and that has nothing to do with Woody.

He gave Josh, Chills, Marvin, ZaZa, Al consistent minutes all as rookies, I bet if JT performs well he will get his. Coach gets no credit? Top 4 team out of 30 in league so far.

Can you at least admit there you may have a problem with coach hate?

The Hawks do not own a top ten player or own a top 5 coach maybe 10 – maybe 20. So who should get credit.

Of course the post season will prove much. On the other hand our starters are getting more rest because of blow outs. Is the turning of the tide and once again – coaching? or players. I believe it is a little bit of both and we are rolling on the right side of good ball.

KevinA

December 11th, 2009
10:15 pm

oops ZaZa not rookie but young

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:15 pm

What up Big RaY!!!

I’ll see you in phillips in 010. Amir plays his first basketball game tomorrow. Once again he was a beast on the soccer field this season. I had his team playing up in an older age group, and he was still beasting. I guess its time to work on his B-ball game. I think we’re going to the game Sunday.

JB

December 11th, 2009
10:18 pm

Teague has now had two very good games against this team and we’ve seen he can be very good when he has the ball in his hands and making decisions. I wish Woody would put the ball in his hands more or else he’s gonna do the same thing he did with Law by not letting him develop his PG skills.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:22 pm

JB ,

I know I wasn’t part of this particular conversation, but let me ask you something. What is your intention…to break the cycle of the perception you are criticizing, or to perpetuate it?

If European players were brought up to “play that way”, then how do you explain the ones that DON’T “play that way?”

I’ve heard guys like Frye and Aldridge get called soft all the time. Bosh has been maligned with that as well. I can’t believe you’ve never heard that before. Seriously, I’ve heard that all over the place. Don’t know how you missed it over the years…

Uh…Rasheed Wallace called soft? Dude shoots 3s, but I’ve NEVER, EVER heard him referred to as “soft”. You’re so far off base using him in that comparison, I don’t know what to tell you. He shoots roughly 2 threes a game, and he’s also the guy who teamed with Ben Wallace to dominate the East and win an NBA championship. Your analogy sprung a major leak when you included him in that list, sorry.

Like I said earlier: are you looking to break the perception, or just perpetuate both it, and an argument?

Big Ump

December 11th, 2009
10:22 pm

Samuel all I can say about some of these bloggers is amazing, amazing. We have all these HC’s on board tonight. We still winning folks no matter how you spin it. We should be enjoying the season instead of trying to play a blame game when we lose. Some of us just can’t wait for the team to do poorly so they can crank it back up. And believe me all NBA teams will have games that they will stink it up.

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
10:23 pm

Who the hel_ is Ilyasova. Delfino, give me a break. Soft is jacking up threes and playing no defense.

That Diantoni, Colangelo model that was supposed to be the wave of the future. Yes, I hate it.
I’ve herd of Sheed being called a lot of things but “soft’ is not one of them.I stand by my statements. has nothing to do with race but you’re welcome to call it what you want. If you’re soft, i’m calling you soft.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:24 pm

Lacsho ,

What’s good, homie? Keep molding that young’un into a worthy athlete. Few things make a father more proud. :) See you in 2010!

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:26 pm

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
10:26 pm

Maybe you guys can start a petition and have Teague’s jersey retired by the All-Star vreak.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:27 pm

Big Ump ,

Unfortunately you are correct. All I can say is, Woodson has one all-star and Mike Brown has three. Yet Cleveland is trying to keep pace with US, not the other way around, at least for now. Heh. I’d love to hear an argument for THAT one….

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
10:27 pm

All-Star break.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
10:27 pm

JB, yeah it is somewhat subjective, because there are no stats to show how often a player makes physical contact on offense or defense. For the record, I don’t think every player who relies on jump shooting is soft — it’s only the ones who refuse to make physical contact. So a guy like Al Harrington wouldn’t fit the bill, because he regularly mixes it up inside too. I would call a guy like Channing Frye soft, though, since he has been a jump shooter and poor man to man defender his entire career despite playing what is traditionally the most contact-heavy position.

Obviously, like you pointed out, there are soft American players too. When I make general statements, I’m talking about percentages and majorities. There are going to be exceptions to every rule — we have one on our own team who wears #27. But for the number of Euroleague players in the NBA, there’s an astonishingly high percentage who fit the stereotype compared to American players (at least in my opinion — as you said, it is subjective), and the Raptors’ defensive shortcomings start and end there.

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:28 pm

LOL@ Astro Joe….boy, you CRAZY! I knew you were playin’ possum. You’re back. No two ways about it :lol:

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:29 pm

BIG RAY, per that text message earlier LMAO!!!!!

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:30 pm

Good Lord, arguing semantics….after a blowout victory on the road, no less. Gotta love it…

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:30 pm

Lacsho ,

LOL, what did I tell you? :lol:

Big Ray

December 11th, 2009
10:31 pm

I’m out. Gotta be suited, booted, and ready for duty at 0445 hrs. Time to catch them Zs, baby!

Peace out…

Lacsho

December 11th, 2009
10:33 pm

WTF Cleaveland??????

JB

December 11th, 2009
10:36 pm

Of course you don’t think Rasheed is soft! He gets technicals! He throws tantrums and towels at teammates. Tough!! That’s exactly my point. It’s all about perception. You don’t think a guy like Ilyasova is tough because he’s European and white, but Rasheed can get away with not rebounding or blocking shots and he’s tough? By the way, he doesn’t shoot two three pointers a game. It’s actually 4-5 a game for most of his career. Your point about Detroit being a great defensive team just proves my point, which is that basketball is a team game and the whole defensive unit is greater than the sum of the parts. Just look at our team. Joe, Crawford, Bibby are all poor defenders individually but they’re part of a great team defense.

JB

December 11th, 2009
10:42 pm

Najeh, I wasn’t talking about tonight’s game in particular. I agree the Raptors are just flat out soft, black white or purple. I’m just responding to a common stereotype I read everywhere on the net. I think you’re overestimating and you’re also ignoring the big factor about different styles and the Euros having to change their game to fit in over here, but…agree to disagree.

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
10:45 pm

Mike Brown and Woody are very similar in coaching styles. They focus on D and rebounding, and leave it to their most talented offensive players to figure out the scoring side. The result is tons of ISOs and bail-out shots. No team has ever won a title playing that type of ball on offense. Phil, Pop, Doc, Riley – all have actual offensive systems that emphasize movement.

ISOs with All-Stars will get it done in the regular season. But on the biggest stage against the best coaches and players, it breaks down. That’s why the Bulls and Lakers couldn’t break through until Phil came in, and why Larry Brown was able to break down the disorganized Lakers in ‘04 after the team’s stars decided that the triangle wasn’t a good idea, despite the fact that they had a vastly superior team on paper. Turns out that even with 3 of the greatest players of the past 20 years, a good coach figured out ways to stop ISO plays. When Phil came back and Kobe stopped tuning him out, the Lakers improved immediately (anyone else remember how close the Lakers came to knocking off the ‘06 Suns, despite having a team whose second and third offensive options were Lamar Odom and Smush Parker?). Amazing how that worked.

It’s fun watching the Hawks win now. But I’ve seen this movie before twice since I was born – Hawks teams that look great in the regular season and then collapse in the playoffs. So until May, I’m reserving judgment.

Astro Joe

December 11th, 2009
10:51 pm

Speaking of soft big men, I see that our current HOF PG, Teague, out-rebounded the 6′11″ LaMarcus Aldridge tonight. Good to see Aldridge pick-up his rebounding game in the absence of Oden. Aldridge is from Paris right? Paris, Texas!

RLP

December 11th, 2009
10:52 pm

One of the best statistics for judging a team is said to be point differential. The Hawks have the third best in the league behind only the Celtics and the Lakers at plus 7.7 per game. Pretty good company it you ask me. Is this the year the Hawks have a breakout season.

In the past the seven game series against the Celtics has been pointed to as the biggest series in this team’s development.. Now will this season be pointed to as the second big development in their development? How many of us are enjoying the fruits of this team’s accomplishments more than ever?

There is of course a long way to go but how can anyone not like what this team has done so far this year? We have a series of games against teams with poor records. Unlike in the recent past this team seems to have benefited from the lost to the Knicks. Enjoy this run as long as it lasts.

By the way – just for the record Ken S. prediction for the nest 10 games now stands at 2 Wins and 0 losses.

Walt

December 11th, 2009
10:55 pm

I agree with JB that it’s unfair to call Euros soft just because they’re tall and don’t get physical. They grow up playing a different type of game over there. You can’t just expect them to come here and immediately pick up physical post play just like you can’t expect every American to go overseas and be a great shooter and ball handler. I bet many US players would struggle in Europe. That doesn’t mean they’re bad or not ____ enough. It just means they don’t do well in that type of league.

Ken Strickland

December 11th, 2009
10:59 pm

I hope someone else has been paying attention to what happens when you allow your bench players to contribute. I just hope Woody can appreciate their contributions and potential when we play the better teams, like Orlando, Cleveland, Boston etc. Good win tonight Hawks.

Also, we’ve played excellent DEF for the 3rd consecutive gm, and for the 3rd consecutive gm we’ve primarily played straight up man to man DEF. I hope that hasn’t gone unnoticed as well.

JB

December 11th, 2009
11:03 pm

What’s great about 16-6 is that we earned it. We’ve had one of the toughest schedules in the league.

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:05 pm

Walt,

If they are tall and don’t get physical, what do you call them then?

Naj,

I disagree. Where was Phil’s triangle a couple of years ago when a healthy KG and company totally took them out their game. It’s not about the offensive scheme it’s about the players. According to many here, Eddie Jordan and his “Princeton Offense” was a great offense but it don’t look so hot right now. Pop and the Spurs are struggling because his “players” are getting old and can’t turn it up offensive or defensively.

The Jordan era Bulls won because of stifling defense and the greatest player of all time.

RLP

December 11th, 2009
11:08 pm

The Hawks now have a winning percentage of ..727 %. If they continued at that pace for the year they would win 60 games which is 3 more than the franchise record. AND if they defeat a team with only 2 wins this year then that winning projection will increase to 61 games for the year.

I am not claiming that will happen. I just think it is important to put that into the perspective of what is currently happening with this year’s team and what a wonderful job they have done so far this year.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
11:13 pm

“Of course you don’t think Rasheed is soft! He gets technicals! He throws tantrums and towels at teammates. Tough!! ”

He also plays man to man defense on Dwight Howard better than arguably anyone else in the NBA, which is the main reason the Celtics signed him. That’s why I don’t consider him soft.

I haven’t seen more than about five minutes of Ilyasova or Delfino this season, so I can’t pass judgment on them. Like me and Sam have demonstrated, people do have different opinions on “softness”. I don’t think being a perimeter oriented offensive big man alone makes you soft — like you point out, Sheed has been a jump shooter most of his career. It’s the willingness to mix it up physically, on either end of the floor, that separates people who are soft from people who are not, at least to me. Andrea Bargnani is as athletic as any 7-footer in the league, and could easily be a much better defender and low post presence if he wanted. It’s his mentality that makes him soft, not his physical abilities or his talents, and although he’s made huge strides in other areas, he’s no better in his mentality than he was on day one of his NBA career.

That leads me to my next point — it’s fair to say that you can’t expect a Euroleague player to come here and immediately adapt to the more physical style of play. But if you look at a guy like Dirk Nowitzki, you see a guy who was as soft as ever when he first arrived here, but who worked hard to adapt to the American style of play and made himself into a legit superstar. I don’t even see that improvement out of most Euro players who come here — most of them seem to never improve in that regard. Who knows, maybe you are right and I am over-representing a small sample of Euro players. It just seems to me there’s a much higher percentage of softies among them than among Americans.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 11th, 2009
11:15 pm

But anyway, like you said, agree to disagree, and back to the Hawks who have zero soft players of any background on the team…

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:16 pm

Dream on Ken,

Randmo, Pigfoot and JTO will not sniff the floor against good teams. Teague will get his chance but if he can’t knock down the open shot in “pressure” situations he will find his way back to the bench. Good defensive players will dare him to shoot. Anyways, he should get plenty of burn in the next week or so if we take care of business against Jersey and Memphis. Bibby should be able to rest that ankle. Good

Bulls targeting Johnson?

Two NBA sources said the Chicago Bulls are emerging as one of the leading candidates to land Joe Johnson(notes) when the Atlanta Hawks guard becomes a free agent after the season.

Johnson, sources say, is intrigued about teaming up with Bulls point guard Derrick Rose(notes). Johnson’s agent, Arn Tellem, also is close to Bulls chairman Jerry Reinsdorf and the Bulls would love an elite perimeter shooting threat to make up for the loss of Ben Gordon(notes).

The New York Knicks have been mentioned as another possible suitor. Johnson played under Mike D’Antoni when he coached the Phoenix Suns. A source also said Johnson would have interest in returning to the Boston Celtics, who drafted him in 2001, but such a scenario is laughable unless there is a sign-and-trade because the Celtics won’t have salary-cap room.

The Atlanta Hawks, of course, can still offer Johnson the most money. While Johnson turned down a four-year, $60 million extension before the season, the Hawks can offer him up to six years in a deal. The Hawks also are an emerging Eastern Conference power and Johnson is the only player in their rotation that will be a free agent next summer.

“We had some great dialogue this summer,” Hawks GM Rick Sund said. “While there was the possibility of extending his contract, the rules are more favorable to be a free agent next summer. That’s the route he wanted to go. We are going to do everything to keep him.”

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:21 pm

Teague=A healthy Speedy

Walt

December 11th, 2009
11:23 pm

Sam,

They’re called whatever any other tall, non-physical, 3pt shooting NBA player is called. JB named some. Kevin Durant, Charlie Villanueva, Jeff Green, Ryan Anderson, Troy Murphy, Ryan Gomes, Antawn Jamison, and Lamar Odom are some others.

RLP

December 11th, 2009
11:29 pm

Tomorrow night’s feature game is no doubt between the Celtics and the Bulls. The Bulls are 6-3 at home while the Celtics are 10-1 on the road. This is a chance for the Celtics to be defeated, Right now however, they are playing with a lot of confidence and have won nine in a row.

Chicago playing at home is tough. They are one of the three teams I predicted to defeat the Hawks during the 10 game span Ken S. has set for our predictions. In one way it would be nice to see Chicago end the Celtics win streak. In another way one wishes that the Bulls would lose at home to allow the Hawks to go into that game with a bit more confidence against a team that is suddenly struggling to win at home. How many on this blog prefer a Chicago win? Count me as one. But if the Bulls lose to the Celtics and the Lakers and then defeat the Knicks so that they enter the game against the Hawks with a 7-5 w/l record will that have any effect on how they play the Hawks? Will it help the Hawks if they defeat Nets and enter this game on a five game winning streak? I think all of these other games factor into how the two teams fare when they meet next week.

Of course the Hawks need to defeat the Nets and the Grizzles who have a 3-9 W/L record on the road this year. If they do and which they should do then that might give them a boost in that game as well. Let us hope so.

JB

December 11th, 2009
11:38 pm

You know what, I think this hyped up summer is going to be a huge letdown for anyone expecting superstars to move everywhere. I bet nothing major happens and Joe will re-sign with the Hawks. If anything, I think we might actually be the ones to attract one of the superstars. Why would they want to play for New York, Chicago, or New Jersey when they can actually WIN here. If Sund can make some space we could attract Wade and become unstoppable.

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:38 pm

Durant is a guard who happens to be 6′10″. Will go down as one of the best ever. Nuff said. Charlie V is soft, Jeff Green plays hard and is a good young wing player, Ryan Anderson is soft but that’s what they want from him(not much room for him on the blocks), Troy Murphy is Soft, Ryan Gomes(haven’t seen enough of him), Antwan Jamison is a good player(maybe a little soft but an All star when healthy), Lamar Odom is one of the most versatile players in the game. He can play inside and out.

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:42 pm

JB,

I agree. A couple of summers ago I was debating with some people(Ando) about free agents coming here. I think we may pick up somebody next year.

RLP

December 11th, 2009
11:43 pm

Samuel :

You are spot on with your observation about Lamar Odom. Which is one of my biggest complaints about the NBA. How can the Lakers afford a player of Odom’s ability to be a sixth man?

Having said that however I just realized that the Hawks have achieved something similar with Jamal Crawford as this team’s sixth man. And the Hawks do not have the financial resources of the Lakers! Here is at least one shout out to Mr. Sund.

niremetal

December 11th, 2009
11:44 pm

Samuel,

It was me you were after re: the ‘08 Finals, not Najeh. And you’re just making stuff up if that’s your account of those Finals. The Lakers offense averaged 94.3ppg, which is admittedly way less than normal but also significantly more than what the Celtics gave up on average. The Celtics were the NBA’s best defensive team. The Lakers simply had trouble executing against them. The result was exactly what most people expected going in – the Celtics and Lakers were the NBA’s two best teams, but the Celtics were deeper and tougher.

Phil and Doc both coached that series very well. And the players all played quite well. The Celtics simply were a better team.

And if a team is only as good as its players, why should we give Woody an extension? Why can’t we just hire my ten year old brother and put him out there?

But I actually agree with you re:Teague. He looks like a slightly more athletic version of Speedy.

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:49 pm

“simply had trouble executing” that’s funny.

Samuel

December 11th, 2009
11:56 pm

Yea RLP, the salary cap is a joke but I believe we can get a true star here.
Sorry guys, I gotta go. i got a road game tomorrow about 3 hours away ,in a big yellow bus, in 25 degree weather. Fun!!

Alien in ATL

December 11th, 2009
11:59 pm

Big Ray.
Your 10:10 PM comment:
I love 16-6, but it’s too early for me to give the man that plaque. Besides, I think he wants a contract more …

So the man has to coach like you bloggers think he should coach and not think of his future? Is that the way you act in your job? Your comment makes no sense at all, unless you want to keep your backstabbing plan ready for the next game the Hawks will loose. Give it up and recognize a coach doing a good job., using his team as he knows them best and giving some players enough time to gain confidence in games they fit at moments they fit. I am waiting on all your comments the first time he plays Teague 20+ minutes and the Hawks loose the game!

niremetal

December 12th, 2009
12:07 am

You do realize that it was the Lakers’ defense that was the bigger problem, right Samuel? The Lakers allowed the Celtics to score 103.3ppg. That was actually more than the Lakers gave up during the year and more than the Celtics averaged over the course of the year. But hey, if you want to blame the failure of the triangle because that helps you prop up your boy Woody, be my guest. Ask your cuz sometime about that one, though.

JB

December 12th, 2009
12:10 am

Come on, everyone knows the Lakers lost because they had too many soft Euros!

European in US

December 12th, 2009
12:13 am

What is up with all those comments against Europeans (and please, for me the term “Euro” is just as bad as using the “N”-word in the US! For all you ignorant bloggers: the Euro is the currency used in Europe. Would you like it if we called you “Dollars”?
Secondly, in Europe, the referees at least still follow the official basketball rule book. The NBA is only refereed as a showcase for not knowledgeable hamburger eaters.
A European game is honestly more likable from a sports perspective than the sold show cases that are performed in the NBA. Your referees don’t have the slightest knowledge of the most simple rules like travel, double dribble, offensive foul, etc. They only blow their horns for the “big payed” so called super stars that wouldn’t see a lot of playing time the first year they would go over to Europe. If the NBA is so good, why don’t they win every World Championship or Olympic? By the way, we don’t call the winner of the European League the “World Champion” because in Europe, we realize the world doesn’t end at our borders!

niremetal

December 12th, 2009
12:15 am

If the NBA is so good, why don’t they win every World Championship or Olympic?

Because the NBA isn’t a country.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 12th, 2009
12:33 am

LMAO @ niremetal…

Mychelfromatl

December 12th, 2009
12:46 am

Damn White Amerericans beefing with Europeans SMH. Who wudda thunkit?

Strangely enough, I was having this same exact conversation today with one of my co-workers. Basically I was surprised that there is probably more International players in the league than White Americans. I’m not gonna front, its weird to see, I don’t even know of a young, White-American up-and-coming All-Star. I mean what happen to the Bird’s, Stockton’s, Majerle’s, Laettner’s, etc. I know the NBA is the league of ultimate athletes (6-9, 250 pound players that run like gazelles, and jump like pumas; but damn. What the hell happen?

Its really is an interesting topic nontheless.

Mychelfromatl

December 12th, 2009
12:47 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Americans**

Alien in ATL

December 12th, 2009
12:49 am

Funny how some of you on the blog have a lot to say when the game just starts and it isn’t yet going as they would like. All the hate on the coach and the core players because one player they like isn’t playing yet. Blind for the contributions that Joe J. or Mike B., even Marvin W., are giving that don’t show always in the box! But once they have to acknowledge the coach is doing a great job, they disappear! Only to come back when their player is out of the game for a couple of minutes!. Pathetic!!
If you really believe that a team can depend on a rookie PG you bluntly show you don’t know a nickle of what the game is about! Of course, not one coach is perfect, and every game the team looses, he has made bad decisions like why didn’t player Z play more than player X, and why did he leave player Y in the game while player Q seemed to be hotter. But I honestly believe the coach knows his team better than any one of you on this blog! He works with them, every day of the season. Anyone is entitled to his opinion, but give kudos’s to the man that leads a winning team.
A lot of you claim he doesn’t develop enough his young players. Well, maybe he wants to protect them from being thrown out there and be destroyed. Maybe he wants them to gain confidence in the easy games so they can grow and be ready when needed. Maybe he wants to protect them of being burned out after 5 years in the NBA?
In my honest opinion, he’s doing a lot better job than some of the other coaches throwing their rookies in the arena. And don’t forget, every player is different! Some young guys can take it in their rookie year, some can’t. Compare Al Horford and AC Law: both drafted the same year. I was at their first game. Al was good, making a lot of mistakes in his first game, but good. AC was pitiful! Al worked himself in the starting rotation after a couple of games – AC didn’t work and got injured and never even tried to come back! JT has more potential, and is working hard, that is why he gets more minutes AC wouldn’t even have got if he wasn’t traded away! But of course, it’s all Woody’s fault if a player doesn’t want to work and prove he’s worth of playing time.

BTW: I get offended too with those “Euro” remarks. What would Dallas be without Dirk? What would San Antonio be without Tony? And a lot of other teams are using Europeans (the Lakers even use a “black” European, but none of you would know of course, because there could only be “white” Europeans, right?).

I agree with the shout-out Mike Woodson = COY

European in US

December 12th, 2009
12:55 am

Niremetal:
Oh soooooo funny!!! Just proves your ignorance!
But at least, most European players, even those playing in the NBA for American teams, are still proud to represent their country! Unlike some of your stars that don’t’ want to get their shirt wet if they don’t get millions! (BTW – you might start seeing more US players moving to Europe because the Euro is worth a lot more that your Dollar!)

European in US

December 12th, 2009
1:00 am

And if you are soooo smart: Why you call the NBA Champion a “World” Champion? to my knowledge, the NBA only consists of 29 US and 1 Canadian team. Hardly a representation of the world, is it?

JB

December 12th, 2009
1:01 am

That’s another myth. NBA players aren’t going to flock to Europe en masse for money. The best players in the world want to play in the best league, which is the NBA, period.

Najeh Davenpoop

December 12th, 2009
1:08 am

The NBA has the best basketball players in the world, so its champion is the world champion.

The MLB has the best baseball players in the world, so the winner of the World Series is the world champion.

The day European powerhouses like Maccabi stop getting blown out in exhibition games against NBA laughingstocks like the Knicks, we can change the conversation. Until then, the NBA is the best league in the world with the best players in the world.

European in US

December 12th, 2009
1:12 am

JB – don’t confuse “Best League” with”Most Paying” League! As a European, I acknowledge that more money is spent in the NBA (and other sports like the world famous baseball or American football that are basically only played in the US, but still call their champions “World Champions”!) than in countries outside of the US. Your market is bigger, and you have the advantage of companies stupid enough rather to pay millions of dollars to get some commercials in during a game than paying their employees a fair salary. But that is your way of freedom – who am I to object to it? Just stay honest and accept that other opinions exist and that you don’t have to start calling names to someone expressing a different opinion than yours.

European in US

December 12th, 2009
1:16 am

Najeh – you just said it – it are only exhibition games! So who cares??! They are comparable to the pre-season games in the NBA: getting your team some “game” practice, but not much more worth than a line in the TV Listings.

European in US

December 12th, 2009
1:24 am

And by the way Najeh – LMAO about your comments about MLB!! Where else than in North America is baseball considered a real sport??! Sure, there is some baseball in South America, and Japan is getting an interest in it (more because of gambling opportunities than something else in my opinion). But in all of those South American countries and even in Japan, it is a marginal sport, way behind other (real) sports. So it is easy to call yourself “World Champion” if you are the only country playing it!

Alien in ATL

December 12th, 2009
1:26 am

Still anyone around wanting to discuss the Hawks?

Wabe

December 12th, 2009
1:30 am

Suns just beat the Magic.

Good stuff.

European in US

December 12th, 2009
1:34 am

JB – btw, the last comment in my 1:12 post was not directed to you – I just wanted to express a feeling to other posts I have been reading – bloggers calling names to someone with a different opinion. I should have made that more clear in my post – my apologies for any misunderstanding.

Alien in ATL

December 12th, 2009
1:35 am

Another Magic loss is GREAT!!!

European in US

December 12th, 2009
2:00 am

JB – one last comment before I go to get some sleep: most of your NBA players don’t want to go play in Europe, because they know they wouldn’t get much playing time their first months of playing – they would have to learn almost from scratch how to play according the real rules of basketball! Not according the NBA copy of rules that is only in place to sell it to the public and to advantage your “star” players! LBJ wouldn’t hold a quarter before being fouled out of the game – he wouldn’t be able to perform his “dancing with the stars” move on the way to the basket as much as he is allowed here. How can you explain that it are your so called 2nd rank players that are able to perform on the international level, while none of your “stars” really come through? A Paul Gasol or Tony Parker get better ratings in those kind of games than a LBJ or Kobe B., simply because they don’t get the same “protection” as they do here. That is why they don’t want to represent their country as a real “superstar” as they claim to be! They are afraid of making themselves a laughing stock!!

Mychelfromatl

December 12th, 2009
4:26 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SMH.

Fritz

December 12th, 2009
5:58 am

Ken Trickland,

Let’s hope Woody is noticing what happens when he uses his bench because he’s the only one that matters. We are so much better when everyone’s involved and the ball is moving on offense, Let’s hope he notices that too and loses tolerance for those that dribble the cloock away and go one on one against double and triple teaming defenders. There’s a time and place for ISO-Joe, but not when it’s the foundation of our offense. It’s so difficult to defend us when everyone touches the ball.

Clyde

December 12th, 2009
6:56 am

Big Ray

December 12th, 2009
8:26 am

Alien in ATL ,

Maybe if you knew what I was talking about, my comment would make more sense. I gave Woody plenty of credit for the team’s record in my previous post, which I had cut and pasted. The only thing I said is that I didn’t endorse giving the man Coach of the Year award (hence the reference to the plaque) for being 16-6. They don’t give out awards for the season when you’re only 22 games into it. MVP, DPOY, COY, MIP, and such awards are given at the end . Furthermore, I stated that Woody is most likely far more interested in a contract extension than he is in winning Coach of the Year.

That was an endorsement of Woody, not an indictment .

Here’s another excerpt from an earlier post: As for Woody’s offense….I agree that there are some problems there. I don’t want to get into too much detail on that opinion, but I will say this: We just took over third place in the Eastern Conference standings, ahead of the Cavs. Yeah, THOSE Cavs. The guys with Lebron and Shaq. Mo Williams, etc. That’s THREE all-stars. Our offense may not be as good as we want it to be, but 21 games in, and this is where we are.

Not only that, but we’re 6th in the NBA in points scored per game, trailing only Phoenix, Denver, Toronto, Golden State, and the L.A. Lakers. That puts us ahead of some pretty good teams and pretty good coaches. Out of those teams, only L.A. is clearly better than us. Phoenix is debatable, and Denver is too, if you ask me. Hey, we may not like everything we see, but something must be working, at least for now.

Of course, the other way of looking at it is to say “call me back in another 20 games, or after a key player goes down with injury.” Well, last I looked, that hurts most teams. Ask the Spurs. I don’t like the ISOs, but when we share the ball, we’re VERY hard to beat. That, and not everything is Woody. Sometimes our guards get too shot happy.”

NOW you know. Your back-stabbing comment is off base. But keep your knife. I’m sure you’ll want to try and use it again.

Stanky leg

December 12th, 2009
8:38 am

European in US ,

Wow that is funny. I wonder how you’d explain Kobe Bryant leading our non-real basketball playing stars to Olympic gold in the summer of 2008? Let me guess, Tim Donaghy was the lead ref in all the games, and the whole thing was fixed.

Maybe the money, benefits, and endorsements are what keeps our stars from going overseas. Or maybe it’s because the USA is still the place to be. I mean, you’re here, aren’t you? :twisted:

JeJe

December 12th, 2009
9:02 am

Hawks are playing well but Woodson has to use Teague and Collins more in CLOSE GAMES and not just stick to a 6 man rotation

newkid

December 12th, 2009
9:30 am

Who would have thought that one might find on a basketball blog – and post-midnight – such an interesting ‘verbal clash’ in national/continental perspectives? And this on the heels of having just listened to a 30-minute C-SPAN segment comparing/contrasting French and US health care systems. Coming up to the end of 2009, hardly anyone can be excused for being ignorant, can they?

Not to discourage that dialogue (actually I rather enjoy that sort of interchange), but I’ve got a Hawks basketball question. I’ll need to tee up my question with a few observations.

So, as we see the early signs of the gradual emergence of JQuick (Teague), I’ve wondered if Sund (and if he’s presumptuous, maybe Woody as well) is beginning to have thoughts about how best to complement his talents on the floor. JQuick features a different skillset than Bibby. For example, JQuick’s dribble drive ability is already demonstrating that it will create HUGE (deference again to Woody) opportunities for sharpshooting 2’s, 3’s, and 4’s (and even 5’s who can step out on the floor and shoot from range with accuracy). If JJ decides he would rather be in Hawks blue in future, then JQuick’s ability to create for others might well argue against Woody continuing his love affair with isolation plays, as is the case primarily with JJ. Unless there’s a significant change in the CBA, the Hawks will have ‘control’ of JQuick for the next 8+ years.

So, here’s the question: How should Sund’s future personnel decisions (both coaches & players) reflect an appreciation for differences in the PG skills of JQuick versus those of any other PG we’ve had in the ATL in more than 30 years?

Rufus1

December 12th, 2009
10:13 am

Great Discusion

The development of Teague as a legit PG would go a long way to change my perception of Woody.

Rufus1

December 12th, 2009
10:18 am

2nd unit

Our second unit is very talented…they could probably could win 20 games in an NBA season and most are free agents.

Woody did not develop them.

RLP

December 12th, 2009
10:52 am

With a win against the Nets on Sunday the Hawks will be tied for first in the Southeastern Division. They currently have the fourth best record in all of the NBA. They have the third best point differential of all teams in the NBA. They are on a pace to win more games than at any time in franchise history. I have been following the Hawks since their move to Atlanta in the 1960’s. I cannot think of a time during their tenure here that is more exciting than what is happening right now. My question – given all that I stated above why was the write-up of last night’s game found on the lower half of page six of the sports page in the AJC? (Ken S. – this is NOT directed at you.)

In this blog there is room for discussions as to the quality of the coach, the value of individual players, the type of offense and/or defense the team plays, the development of players. Heck we even debate US versus world basketball. But why is everyone so willing to accept second class status for our team when they are playing at this level?

That was really all I was going to say in this post. But after completing the post I sat here and reflected on the question I asked. I guess I really should give a little of my view although what I think is probably best left unsaid.

I think one problem for basketball in Atlanta may also be related to the discussion of US versus European basketball players. In the US, especially in the South, basketball is perceived as the sport of black men. I think that perception has something to do with the fact that there are so few white Americans at the pro level. I do not think that white males all have the “white man’s” disease of slowness and lack of jumping ability. But good white athletes have a plethora of other sports to draw their attention. In Europe however basketball does not have to contend with superior black athletes who would discourage their participation and therefore they are allowed to develop better skills than whites in this country. Based on the influx of white athletes from Europe I would say that basketball produces a better product when there are new strains introduced into the game. It is sad to me that there are so few white bb players from the US in the game only because the game then loses another source of strength for the game itself. But when it comes to coverage of the game we should realize the harm to publicity this aspect of the game creates.

newkid

December 12th, 2009
11:05 am

RLP,
Gotta leave for the library for a few hours, but can’t wait to see the reactions to the last paragraph of your last post upon my return. WOW!

MyView

December 12th, 2009
11:08 am

Those of you who keep bringing up all the mid-season trade scenarios are just dreaming. There is absolutely no way the ASG or Sund will change anything about this team given the current position in the Standings and the pace they are on. Two games off the conference lead and 1/2 game off the division lead after 1/4 of the season. Who in their right mind would tinker with that, unless pre-season expectations were higher. Especially now that the team is starting to gel. Maybe the first 20 games were the rough draft and not the final copy. If that is the case, then the end result could still be a trophy.

Some of you are more impatient than my 10 year old daughter.

Big Ump

December 12th, 2009
11:12 am

Alien in Atl

Your post at 12:29 was right on point, except for what Big Ray said.
I understand what Big Ray was saying. One thing about Big Ray is that he will give credit when due. Here is another example of some of these bloggers comment. If the 2 unit play bad, then it’s HC fault,and if they played good then HC don’t have anything to do with it. Which one is it? You can’t have it both ways.

Ken Strickland

December 12th, 2009
11:47 am

BIG RAY-Before the season started I predicted Cleveland would have problems when everyone else was lauding them for acquiring Shaq, Moon and Powe. They added Shaq to solve their inability to play DHoward without double teaming him. However, they did nothing to solve their biggest problem, which was their inability to defend the pick and roll with Ilgaukas. In that area Shaq is actually worse than Ilgaukas.

I said they would have problems at the start of the season with:

(1) Chemistry issues

(2) OFF issues with Shaq playing inside, especially with the outside shooting of Ilgaukas going to the bench.

(3) Neither Powe, Moon or Shaq would be able to replace the outside shooting they lost when they replaced Ilgaukas a starter and lost Szczerbiac and JSmith.

(4) Teams would start the season using the same pick and roll strategy against them they failed to address and that Orlando used to embarrass them when they eliminated them from last yrs playoffs.

We are a good team with Woodson as our HC, but we would be a much better team if he’d commit to consistently doing the things that’s best for the team, and the things the team is best suited for, and failing that, if he was replaced.

Samuel

December 12th, 2009
1:05 pm

Ken,

So you are saying that we would be better than the Lakers, Celtics, magic and Cleveland with this phantom coach that you nor anyone else has identified yet?

Rufus,

You are comical my friend.

RLP, I agree that the lack of white American players hurt the game from an “image” standpoint. People are always quick to degrade the NBA and it’s players simply because it’s a black man dominated game. There are definitely double standards compared to Football and Baseball.

I’m not sure I agree that having more white players will help the game itself though. What source of strength are you talking about. Please elaborate. Good post though.

Woody=COY

O'Brien

December 12th, 2009
1:13 pm

Great win for the Hawks. But lets keep it in perspective. It was the Raptors, the same team against who we scored 146 pts earlier in the week.

That being said, lots of positives. The bench play, and our defense. I hope the team (and Woody) can keep it going for the next few games. And I dont care which team we’re playing, Teague should get minutes.

And I agree with nire. I would not give Woody a new contract until after the playoffs are over. When you’re playing the same team 7 times, adjustments are made from game to game. That is when I want to see some consistency from the Hawks.

But I will enjoy the regular season. Over 50 wins, and the 3rd/4th seed.

cp

December 12th, 2009
2:44 pm

Who has blamed the coach if the second unit has not played well? I have yet to see a blogger blame Woodson for the bench not playing well. I have seen bloggers blame Woodson for not using the bench but not because they did not produce. Some of you cats are really reaching on here with these comments… If Woodson handles his business then he will get an extension. How hard is that to understand? You keep saying if certain players produce they will get minutes well how come the same thing cant be said about Woodson. If he does his job this season I don’t see a reason why he wont get extended.

ncat96

December 12th, 2009
3:14 pm

Hello everyone. I have to say that in reading some of your comments in this blog . . . it’s a wonder that we can’t fill the Philips Arena. If the naysayers are as prevelant as the ones on this blog then Philips Arena will never be full consistently. The Hawks will never be good enough for the half of you who blog. There will always be something that you will find wrong even in blowout wins. You remind me of Philly fans who always have something negative to say even in the midst of winning. It’s as if the Hawks have to win in the style that you see fit before you will ACCEPT them or the coach to be good enough from your perspective. GEE . . . just enjoy the fact that they are doing very well a quarter of the way into the season. They are playing more consistent this year than the previous years. Can they make the finals . . . I don’t know. But they sure look like they can. I am just so excited that they are even at this juncture as a team. We as fans can be critical without being dismissive about the nature of the team, the coach, and the whole Atlanta Hawks franchise. To me this is the best that I have seen the Hawks play since the Wilkins days. So lighten up fellow Hawks fans and enjoy the ride. Just think of where we were at five years ago . . . how soon we forget about those dog days . . .

Rufus1

December 12th, 2009
3:30 pm

Doc Rivers syndrome

Who gets more credit fpr the recent Celtics championship…Ainge or Rivers. You have to give Doc some credit for managing them to a Title but Ainge made the team a contender. We have had atleast 12 draft picks since Woody has been our coach..we have 4 on the roster.

Portland has 11 of there draft picks on the roster in the same 6 years. My problem with Woody has always been, player development. Look at OKC, all there stars were drafted.

Woody’s Offense

I don’t have any problems with his offense…except is was designed for a player like Teague and not Bibby. When Teague runs the offense it looks aggressive. When Bibby runs the offense it looks slow.

Samuel

I simply believe our coach is more Wade Phillips than Bill Belichek. I think he has wasted talent over the years and if we don’t play better in the playoffs, I would have problem with his return. My expectations match the talent that I see on this team. If we hadn’t aquired Jamal and Joe Smith, I would be happy with 50 games.

Rufus1

December 12th, 2009
3:39 pm

CP

I agree 100% if he produces he will get his extension.

I will be happy to eat crow if woody produces…I already eaten crow about Josh Smith.

Daniel

December 12th, 2009
4:24 pm

FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON FIRE MIKE WOODSON

Big Ray

December 12th, 2009
4:47 pm

I’m staying out of the black-white thing. I just don’t even see a purpose in such a discussion, it nearly always goes awry, but y’all can have at it. Somebody’s going to get their feelings hurt, though. Can tell ya that right now…

Ken Strickland ,

What can I say? So far, you are being proven right about the Cavs. Now, can they adjust? I’ll tell you right now, this sets the table for Mike Brown. He got COY last year, but THIS year he gets to prove his mettle, and whether or not he deserved to get that plaque. Personally, few things would make me happier than for us to overtake Cleveland. But that involves finishing it off: have to get past them in the playoffs. It’s early, we’ll see what happens.

Big Ump ,

I don’t know what Sund is judging Woody by. I do know that this team is better than it ever has been, warts and all. And you can’t acknowledge that without acknowledging Woody’s involvement therein. There are some things I’d like to see him change, but that is just me talking. I haven’t coached anybody, let alone this team.

Here’s one thing I’ve noticed. Teague is really in a much better position than anybody seems to want to give Woody credit for. He’s getting 10 minutes a game on a team that is far more potent at the guard position than it has been in years. Do we want to see him play more? Yeah, and Woody has said that he WILL play more. I’m willing to bet he will end the season around 15 mpg, the same minutes Law got while playing with a much weaker guard contingent. Right now, he’s getting the same minutes Law got when it was JJ/Bibby/Flip. Now, it’s JJ/Bibby/Crawford. Yet Teague is still getting 10 per game. I think the significance of this is being undervalued.

Seriously. Woody has a better vet, yet the rook still gets some burn. Gotta give him credit for that, especially when he has plans to extend that burn.

As for Woody as COY, I’ve never agreed with touting ANYBODY for that award until seeing what they’ve done all season long. I don’t care WHO it is. But I’d love for him to win it. Why? Because that would mean this team has done something wonderful, something that is significantly better than last year’s accomplishments. Who can be mad with that?

RLP

December 12th, 2009
5:12 pm

SA UEL:

I think I agree with BIG RAY that discussions of black white issues should be rare. All I mean by my statement is that there are probably some white athletes who, if they chose to devote all of their energy and talent to developing that talent in basketball rather than choosing some other sport would contribute to the talent pool in the NBA. They would make the league better. And that is enough about that subject from me.

Big Ray

December 12th, 2009
5:20 pm

CP ,

I agree. Woody handles his biz, he gets an extension. Right now, he’s handling his biz. I don’t know what the hurry is with trying to get him an extension right now is. For the upteenth time, he signed a 2 year contract. If it were me, I’d expect to do my two years, or most of it before getting a new contract.

At the same time, I’m not looking to replace him, because the only guys that I KNOW I’d be cool with replacing him….all have jobs they aren’t leaving. I’d be cool with Greg Popovich, Doc Rivers, Jerry Sloan, and maybe Rick Adelman. Nate McMillan is another maybe. But as stated before, those guys aren’t going anywhere, so it’s not even a thought. Oh, and why no Phil Jackson? Because, he’s a control freak on the level of Don Nelson, and he only coaches stars/superstars. Seriously. Ever seen Jackson coach a young team, or one without serious star power? Nope.

Rufus21 ,

I agree on the playoffs part. We could win 55-60 games, but if we can’t perform better in the playoffs, there is an issue. The question immediately becomes, do you solve the issue by replacing the coach, or by making roster moves? That’s never an easy decision, I think, and if you fire the coach, you have to be certain that whatever you’re firing him for is a fatal flaw. If not, you just made a mistake and simply used him as a scapegoat, meaning that you may replace him with something worse.

For example, has Jay Triano been able to do more with the Raptors squad than Sam Mitchell could? Can ANY coach?

Will the New Orleans Hornets get better now that Byron Scott is gone?

The Wiz may prove to be better under Flip Saunders (I suspect they will in time), but Saunders also doesn’t have the same roster that Eddie Jordan did, a fact that may escape some people.

If the Hawks can’t improve in the playoffs, then there has to be a reason for it. Improvement may not necessarily mean winning in the second round. It may mean a better showing, but still a loss. Do I want to settle for that? No, but reality is reality. If we win 50-something games and then lose 4-3 or 4-2 in the second round of the playoffs, are we still not better than last year?

Like I said, I don’t know what criteria Sund is judging by, but you have to be certain that a coach is the single largest flawed element before letting him go.

The Sixers let their coach go, and brought another one in. But was the coach the single largest issue? Don’t think so. I think it’s Brand and his huge contract.

jlewis

December 12th, 2009
5:30 pm

You guys are funny, I don’t love JJ, but I do know one thing, for all that screaming about PASS the ball, do you ever watch Wade and Lebron, they iso and play the same way and they get a million calls. If you believe J-Crawford can take JJ’s place, you’re on dope, he is better now because he is not drawing the other teams best defender, without Joe, he will and he will turn back into what they got rid of in Chicago, New York and Golden State, a chucker that makes bad decisions. JJ draws double teams which makes a bad shooting Josh, a spot up Bibby and an undersized center in Al better. If he leaves, there is no one in this league that can replace him that you don’t have to pay $20 million a year for.

Grandad

December 12th, 2009
5:44 pm

European in Atlanta:
Some excellent comments particularly about officiating in the NBA. Surely Hawks fans will not defend officials protecting and ‘enhancing’
the play of Wade, LBJ and others.
I don’t know if you spesifically said it, but if not, fundamentals:
there’s your difference.
Europeans are more fundamentally sound because of their phil. of individual w/o’s as opposed to americans – AAU. Deep topic / not enough time to go further into depth.
I missed alot of the “Euro” v Americans conversation but anyone who does not consider Pau Gasol one of the top players
[top 5/no less than top 10] doesn’t understand the game.

Big Ray

December 12th, 2009
5:52 pm

Hard to understand where the post about JJ came from…

But in the interest of stirring the pot, I’ll bet we’ll get more out of anybody we have to pay $20 million a year to, now won’t we? I mean, surely that’s reasonable to expect, since JJ makes $14 or $15 million per year, right? :twisted:

I have to laugh about the JJ drawing double teams thing. While it’s true that he draws double teams, the magic of having Jamal Crawford is that this means JJ draws LESS double teams, because any team playing us has to respect Crawford’s offensive prowess. Sorry, but a guy who can drop 20 or 30 on you ANY given night is not somebody you can ignore.

As for Joe’s drawing double teams making Al and Josh more effective players…explain why this is working THIS year, but didn’t work as well last year? Could it be that maybe they’ve raised their games? Could they have gotten better? Nah, not possible. It’s all JJ. Yep, that’s the ticket…heh…

doc

December 12th, 2009
6:17 pm

not bball talk but glad to see gill get a shot at kansas to coach at that level.

continue to like what i see and hear from our hawks including woody. everyone seems on the same page. it may not show but when this team gels and it will they are going to terrorize even the big boys.

would hope to see more folks at the games soon as high school football ends and football takes a back seat in atlanta. if the falcons lose tomorrow all we have to really talk about of importance will be the hawks and possibly the thrashers. if it becomes the only game in town i would be disappointed if the numbers dont rise appreciably.

doc

December 12th, 2009
6:46 pm

went back a bit and read up on some good bball talk yesterday, instead of the drivel about woody and whether he is good or needs to have a contract now, or how sorry marvin is in comparison to someone else. again glad to see the dialogue be a little more broadened and scope changed to reflect on the league and how this team fits into it.

important to acknowledge the big blow out away from home as an outstanding harbinger of growth. the second unit just about led the team in minutes and in plus differential, double figures no less. when did that happen last?

also it is pretty amazing the point differential is so good. third best in the league as someone, i think rlp, pointed out. that is a hard number to ignore. some of the big wins with spread have been against some pretty good teams. fire is smoldering folks and going to get hotter as teague is allowed to set his pace and feel out the speed of the nba game and the new additions begin to grow into their roles. glad to see teague seeing the flow of the game as he was stuck there trying to find where he needed to be on the court there for a while.

also a shout out to my boy rick for what he has done to this tram since coming here to get them along with wody to get them to buy into the idea that the team could be greater than the individual.

samuel, have you thawed out yet. how did you and your guys do and how is the season going? sure do envy your travels. heh heh keep warm buddy and let us know if you are ready to be resigned for next year along with woody.

samuel = coy …. yet?

I MUS WRITE

December 12th, 2009
7:36 pm

RLP- Really? Nice try but the race thing is gett’n old. Here are sum random thoughts for u to chew on lol…..

1.How would the NBA having more white players improve the global popularity of the game? -It wouldnt,the last time I checked basketball was the 2nd most popular sport worldwide behind futbol (soccer)

2.What sports are these white guys playing? U know the ones who said screw the NBA and the chance to make millions because there are too many Black guys. – Im thinking real hard and im drawing a blank, I dont know one athlete in the NHL,NFL,or MLB that could make an NBA roster or for that matter the D League.

If Europe was as populated with African Americans as the US the number of Euros in the NBA would decrease as well. Players like Dirk,Manu,Gasol,etc could play in any arena against anybody but for every Dirk you hear about there are hundreds of players that cant handle our league. Euro’s also have the benefit of being far away and not put under a microscope like yung ballers from the states. Perfect example would be Jennings vs Rubio….Go ahead and tell me Rubio would be having a better season .

The moral of the story is you either have game or you dont- the country doesnt matter if you can play they will find you. In America they dont find many NBA caliber white guys because for every white standout there are 50 Black guys that are just as good or better

EX. Adam Morrison and JJ Reddick Standout college guys below average NBA PLAYERS.

Big Ump

December 12th, 2009
8:20 pm

Big Ray

Good posts as alawys.

JeJe

December 12th, 2009
8:24 pm

Tomorrow you will all see Brook Lopez have a field day, and Woodson will do his usual “we are sucking. Let me stick to my 6.5 man rotation and not try any of our bench bigs like Collins or RandMo on the bigger center” scheme and cost us the game or come very close to.

LET COLLINS PLAY TOMORROW.

PLEASE

hawks_4_life

December 12th, 2009
8:37 pm

Arm chair coaches got to love em

Clyde

December 12th, 2009
9:09 pm

INGRAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RLP

December 12th, 2009
9:16 pm

I MUS WRITE:

If you will go back to my original post my main point had more to do with the fact that the ALJ chose to place the story of the team’s win last night on the bottom of page 6 of the sports section of the paper. I think that is a disgrace. However, that lead me into making some speculation tied to the discussion of European players versus US players. At the time I acknowledged that I probably should not have opened that can of worms. I have no desire to get into a discussion on the ability of people of different races. It is what it is and any generalization can result in misinterpretations of what is meant. For me the important thing is that anyone of any background can appreciate the beauty of the game when it is played at a high level. However, because some people feel that it is a black man’s game they tend to ignore the athleticism and grace involved in the game.

JeJe

December 12th, 2009
9:17 pm

STFU wit this racist garbage. Get a life you losers

jlewis

December 12th, 2009
9:53 pm

Big Ray, Jamal does not make JJ better, when Jamal is on the floor Joe’s numbers go down, check it. Also, what I meant by the $20 million player, I meant he will give you more because you are paying for the best, but what you pay Joe, you’re going to get less or the same and not as good a defense, if you think so, I want you to name them. Jamal plays against second line defenders, you guys are annointing him King, but think about it, everywhere he has been he has been run off, no defense, and he makes horrible decisions. He is good for scoring and coming off the bench, he plays that role well, but give him a year, because just like most athletes that are traded around, they wll be good for a year, but that second year they revert back to what they are.

Also, the others havent elevated their games, they’ve gotten smarter, especially smoove, if he had listened and played D, rebounded and stopped trying to shoot and play point, his transformation would have occurred two years ago. Brah, I read your post, you have insight, but so do others, i’ve followed the NBA since I was 11, and i’m in my late 40’s, it’s not rocket science, you just separate the guys that can play, from the guys that just run around and jump.

KevinA

December 12th, 2009
10:00 pm

The Hawks assist avg. is 21.7 When the Hawks hit their average their record is 8-0.

Interesting JJ numbers. When JJ has 5 or more assists we are 10-1. When JJ has 4 or less assists we are 5-5.

I have been critical of JJ and Jamal for ISO play and poor ball movement in some of our losses and wins but it is only fair to point out when they do great. In the last couple of games when they do shoot jumpers most of them are around the paint or in the paint. Even our 3 pt shots seem more wide open. Jamal is driving much more and Joe may be the best in the league at the floater.

Last season we saw signs of this type of play and the team not having to rely on one player so much. This year we have fallen on the old habits a few times but the trend is improving. So Kudos to the guards.

In the last two games JT has 15 assists in 42 min. It seems to come so easy for the young kid. Can’t wait to see how good he can be by the end of the year.

RLP

December 12th, 2009
10:07 pm

With 9:30 left in the fourth quarter the Celtics lead the Bulls by 23 points. I think we all have to acknowledge that right now there are only two teams in a league by themselves – The Celtics and The Lakers. At the next level come the Hawks, Magic, Denver, Phoenix and Dallas. For the Hawks this is a step up. For the Cavaliers and the Magic it is a step down.

KevinA

December 12th, 2009
10:08 pm

doc

December 12th, 2009
6:46 pm.
important to acknowledge the big blow out away from home as an outstanding harbinger of growth. the second unit just about led the team in minutes and in plus differential, double figures no less. when did that happen last?

Love that

South ga boy in the atl

December 12th, 2009
10:08 pm

Have to agree with doc, glad the dialogue has
Ives off of “Marvin is awkward and has no talent” and “why doesn’t woody give the 2nd team, ie Teague, more playing time” but damnnnn did we have to go to race. As a Hawks fan who happens to be white I wouldn’t care if zsa zsa was named “ahmistaad” and was African American with the rest of his teammates. I won’t to win. I pull for my team regardless of color. I pull against the other team regardless of color. It’s such a psuedo academic discussion to bring up euro s and “thier could be more amer white players in the NBA if they cared about it. Who cares one way or the other. It’s just a not so slick way of a white person trying to inject race in somewhere it doesn’t belong. I tell u what I care about: Smoove’s allstar play, Al’s tenacity, JJ’s leadership and rock steady play, Bibby hitting 3’s, Jamal’s instant offense, Zsa Zsa and Joe banging the boards, Teague’s brilliant upside, (leave Marvin alone yall. He’s still young lol) and Woody=COY. That’s what matters to me. Our atl Hawks and race shouldn’t mix. Leave that sh#% out of it

RLP

December 12th, 2009
10:10 pm

Cleveland should have been included as a member of the second tier in my earlier posts.

doc

December 12th, 2009
10:39 pm

rlp, it is a long season. the celts were the cream of the league at this point last year when their legs were fresh and the injury bug hadnt hit them blind side. let us see how things unfold.

uh can we drop the euro soft stuff as well.dont consider ginobli, gasol, dirk or parker soft but educated in how they play the game among others as i have witnessed them taking hits and keep right on going. lakers couldnt do it with odem and needed gasol to move him to a better role, soft or smart and tough? it is a different game with different skill set that isnt predicated on how tough one is or soft for that matter, different rules as well. chills performed pretty good here but has yet to light it up there, is he usa rigid and inflexible? if anyone should have flourished there it was him. maybe just maybe the adjustment to their game would be just as tough for some of our tough guy bangers and make them look like caterpillar earth movers on a road racing track. euro soft is a meaningless and provocative term used here frequently by some to do just that, dont fall for it. ;-)

and yeah sheed was soft … between the friggin ears and i was a fan of his. frustrated the heck out of me. he quit way too many times, i mean waaay too many times, to not call him soft in some way.

Ken Strickland

December 12th, 2009
10:41 pm

If the Hawks want to get better, they have to establish a definitive style of play. Right now, we have developed the habit of utilizing our bench and playing uptempo, fastbreaking, attacking the basket, ball sharing, inside scoring basketball only against some of the lessor teams. When we go up against the better teams, we always seem to revert back to using a limited rotation and playing ISO, one on one, ball hogging, perimeter oriented guard dominated halfcourt basketball, or WOODY BALL.

When we play WOODY BALL, if JJ, Crawford and/or Bibby aren’t hitting their jumpers consistently, we’re usually doomed. When we play fast, attack the basket and share the ball, it usually doesn’t matter because everyone usually gets involved. This team can’t get to the next level if fear, apprehension or trust issues are allowed to factor into our style of play from gm to gm and based on who we play.

We are the only playoff calibur team that changes the way it plays and approaches an opponent based on the opponents status. WE ARE TALENTED, DEEP, EXPERIENCED AND VERSATILE ENOUGH TO FORCE THE ELITE TEAMS TO STOP US FROM DOING WHAT WE DO BEST, AND THAT’S USE OUR SPEED, QUICKNESS AND ATHLETICISM TO RUN AND JUMP. The playoff series against Boston was a microcosm of what we’re still doing.

For 3gms in Atlanta, we ran them off the court in Atlanta and they couldn’t do a doggone thing to stop us. But, strange as it seems, when we played them in Boston we completely abandoned what we so successfully did at home and tried to beat them at their own halfcourt gm using WOODY BALL.

These are some of the details Woodson should be paying attention too, or at least have one on his assistants do so. That’s far more acceptable than publically bragging about not paying attention to things like monitoring players mins or the entire OFF, as if it’s some kind of badge of honor to flaunt his incompetence in those particular areas.

Hawks Fan In New Orleans

December 12th, 2009
11:19 pm

These are some of the details Woodson should be paying attention too, or at least have one on his assistants do so. That’s far more acceptable than publically bragging about not paying attention to things like monitoring players mins or the entire OFF, as if it’s some kind of badge of honor to flaunt his incompetence in those particular areas.

Right on Ken.

Mychelfromatl

December 12th, 2009
11:21 pm

What the hell happened to Mark Bradley? Did he do a Sekou Smith? If not Ken, dude seemed as if he could be a good beat writer for the Hawks.

Big Ump

December 12th, 2009
11:31 pm

WOW. Here we go again.Same bloggers same repeated issue. Amazing.

doc

December 12th, 2009
11:32 pm

ken, you are living way in the past if you think the playoffs of 2008 are relevant now 2 seasons later. you are remembering like a women does there dude. bottom line, our guys werent ready to be prime time playas and retreated up there.

ken, we didnt change our style at all in the miami series which we won either last year. we had no bodies to play with cleveland in the last series, so there was no style to speak of. yes, it was shameful to not win one, just the same we werent going to win that series and if we had threatened stern would have squashed it..

this team does have an imo and it is defense first. yes, we are scoring the ball better but it is still secondary to what these guys need to do and do well to achieve wins to play an aggressive defensive style and get stops when they have to.

northcyde

December 12th, 2009
11:39 pm

Mr Strickland, what grade would you give the Hawks as a whole. And what grade would you give Woody so far?

(( Matter of fact, these 2 questions are open for everyone to answer ))

My grade for the Hawks: A-

( No way in the world would I have thought the Hawks would win @ Boston, @ Portland, @ Dallas, go on a 7-game win streak, and be one of the top 5 teams in the league 1/4th into the season. Heck, I would’ve been happy @ 13 – 9 . . . so 16 – 6 is like a dream to me. They have won games playing uptempo, and by grinding it out. Aside for the 3rd quarter disasters against Orlando and LA, and a few meltdown vs bad teams, this team has played stellar basketball )

My grade for Woody: B+

( He established Crawford’s role on this team immeadiately, and wasn’t scared to go to a 3-guard lineup that I thought would be horrendous defensively. Conversely, that lineup, plus Smoove and Horford, is the #3 lineup in the league in +/- ratio. He’s brought the rookie on slowly, as he rightfully should, with Bibby and Crawford able to play the point. And when the 2nd team was losing leads, he didn’t hesitate to play the starters extended minutes to insure victory. Good job by him so far )

northcyde

December 13th, 2009
12:24 am

LOL . . I didn’t ask too hard of a question did I?

I’ll ask it again.

Give the Hawks as a whole a grade so far:

Give Woody a grade so far:

2 simple questions that everyone can give their opinion on.

JeJe

December 13th, 2009
9:09 am

“The definition of a franchise player is one who wants the responsibility for winning or losing,” Dallas coach Rick Carlisle said. ”

And that’s why Joe Johnson is not a franchise player.

doc

December 13th, 2009
9:16 am

jeje, sad to say it but amen to that. when he says it is his fault for losing and our fault for winning then he has my vote. until then simply a very good player that i watch and enjoy just get really frustrated over when he goes into his “i am special role” but fails to execute, we lose, then he blames the team for doing just what he has done the whole game to cost us the victory. said it many times before, when he says, “it is on me” after a loss, then he takes the stripes of being the man, until then, uh, no.

doc

December 13th, 2009
9:21 am

northclyde, that line up was the one i couldnt wait to see on the floor especially at the end of games. many didnt notice last year how effective that type of arrangement was with flip at two and jj in the 3 spot. it was only enhanced with “flip on roids” crawford. the 3 may be the best place for jj for longer stretches in the long run as he gets bigger and stronger.

RLP

December 13th, 2009
9:38 am

DOC:

I agree completely with your point regarding the season as a whole. My point was only made concerning how things are shaping up at this point in the season. Actually even now an argument could be made that the Celtics are only two looses behind the Hawks. But I had really expected the Bulls to give them a better game last night. I know the Bulls are in the doldrums now but still they had a 6-3 w/l record at home before that game so I thought it could be an interesting game. Since the Celtics are now 10-1 on the road I am just very impressed with what they are doing this year. Plus I have never been a fan of the Lakers and hate the idea of that team having an uncontested reign going.

RLP

December 13th, 2009
9:44 am

I should have checked the scores from last night before my last post. The Lakers were defeated by Utah!!!!! I am certainly happy that our game with Utah is a home game or I would have to be questioning my pick there.

northcyde

December 13th, 2009
10:07 am

Doc, it’s northcyde ( n-o-r-t-h-c-y-d-e ). I don’t want people mistaking me as Clyde’s cousin or something.

And you’re correct sir about the 3 guard lineup with Flip last year. Take a look at last year’s +/- numbers compared to this years. I’ll list the starters and the numbers of our best group. ( NOTE: The 09 – 10 numbers are through 12/9, which means that they don’t have the Chicago and Toronto games added in yet, which will make these numbers even higher )

STARTERS ( Bibby – JJ – Marvin – Smoove – Horford )

08 – 09: ( -43 ) . . . Won 15 – Lost 17 . . . Off Rating: 1.04 – Def Rating: 1.09
09 – 10: ( +47 ) . . . Won 11 – Lost 9 . . . Off Rating: 1.10 – Def Rating: 1.01

BEST +/- GROUP:

08 – 09: Bibby – Flip – JJ – Smoove – Zaza

. . . . . . (+71) . . . Won 16 – Lost 11 . . . Off Rating: 1.25 – Def Rating: 0.94

( NOTE: The lineup of Bibby – Flip – JJ – Smoove – Horford got more playing time than the above group, and Won 16 – Lost 9 . . with a +/- of ( +53 )

09 – 10: Bibby – Crawford – JJ – Smoove – Horford

. . . . . ( +104 ) . . . Won 14 – Lost 3 . . . Off Rating: 1.32 – Def Rating: 0.97

It’s an amazing turnaround not only from our “high octane” group, but also from our starting 5, who struggled mightily at the beginning of the year ( partially because of the shooting of Marvin ), but has really come on in the last 10 games or so ( partially because of the shooting of Marvin )

northcyde

December 13th, 2009
10:19 am

As for what a “franchise player” is, it’s a guy who not only is an excellent player, it’s a guy that makes his teammates better ( usually on the offensive end ), and can build a team around.

JJ fits those descriptions. Like it or not, the current Hawks are built around the skills of JJ.

He’ll readily take on the challenge of guarding the other teams best perimeter player ( whether he plays PG, SG, SF, or even PF ). He is not afraid at all to take and make big shots. He’s not reluctant to put the team on his back offensively. He’s not reluctant to pass the ball to open teammates to make them better.

JJ is the embodiment of a franchise player. He just doesn’t have the off-the-charts athleticism that franchise players historically have.

Side note: LOL . . . why won’t anybody grade the Hawks and Woody? I’ll guess I’ll have to ask this question on the next blog ( hopefully that will come up today before the game ). But I’ll keep asking it.

doc

December 13th, 2009
10:29 am

northCYDE, there already is a blog up. ;-) .

i thought your points were relevant enough that even if no one else sees them i wanted to comment.

folks may not like grades either. i usually wait til the end to dig deep into that type of stuff any way. shoot man it aint even mid terms yet. heh heh

South ga boy in the atl

December 13th, 2009
12:52 pm

NorhtCYDE. I’ll grade em. I think overall a B+. Could go A- if it weren’t for the 2 losses to teams we shouldn’t have lost to and Woody gets an A- As has been said earlier he figured out out how best to use Jamal right from the start, when to bring in the second five to change the tempo of the game, and how to bring teague along at the correct pace. One thing I would say though is I would give them an A for effort. Only a couple of hiccups so far with big road wins. They r in the top four now and they r trying to figure out how to handle the pressure of going from a “good” team to an “elite” team. It’s been a process for our Hawks and at each stage they had to figure out their place and how they fit. Well now they have arrived at the final stage. They r an elite team (not saying they will win it all this yr) and they can compete and win at the upper level now. But they just got there so they r trying to figure out how it works. A for effort and the other will come

Ken Strickland

December 13th, 2009
5:31 pm

NOTTHCYDE-Here’s the way I’d grade Woodson.

(1) In the area of player development D.

(2) In the area of using strategy and making adjustments, especially during gms D.

(3) In the area of developing and/or effectively utilizing his bench C-.

(4) In the area of designing an OFF/DEF that takes full advantage of his individual and overall talent C-.

(5) In the area of managing players mins D.

(6) In the area of keeping the team together and playing hard B.

(7) In the area of maintaining consistency in the way the team plays OFF/DEF C.

(8) In the area of keeping the team focused during difficult time for both he and the franchise early in his career A.

(9) In the area of keeping the team on a winning track despite franchise problems, his shortcomings and GM issues B.

(10)In the area of establishing team identity and consistent style of play C-.

Overall, I’d give him a C+.

Woodson did a very good job with this team early, but over the last 2yrs, when the expectations increased, he’s actually hendered the teams ability to become much better. The most frustrating thing for me is it would only require adjustments, not changes, to get this team to the next level. He just needs to pay more attention to details, his bench, players mins, player development, allow his assistants to have more input with strategy and adjustments, and make a commitment to consistently playing the style of ball that’s proven to be the most effective for the team and it’s talent.