Greetings, all-
Hope you enjoyed the game Saturday night.
My thoughts:
- No matter how the Hawks shot the ball, holding Dallas to 75 points in its building is an impressive feat. It’s Dallas’ season low.
- As I made mention in the game story, the Hawks played far better defense than they did against New York and perhaps their best in awhile. Dallas had their runs, but didn’t get that many easy baskets.
- Dirk Nowitzki is ridiculous.
- The Hawks, at times, moved the ball really well to get open shots. But it went stagnant at times – a decent number of possessions where one or two players touched the ball, or players jacking up jump shots early in the shot clock when better shots could have been worked for. They had 16 assists on 32 baskets, an OK number.
- Love him or hate him, Joe Johnson did what he does best, make a lot of baskets, many of them crucial. He took 24 shots to make 31 points.
Some extra quotes:
Mike Woodson: “[Joe Johnson] got off to such a hot start and then we hit the spell in the second quarter where we just couldn’t make a shot. We had some good looks, but to come in (at halftime) up one (was a good thing).”
On the first 20 games: “It’s been a good run. Our schedule was not favorable to start the season and we withstood it. We’ve just got to continue our winning ways on the road and continue our ways at home in terms of winning.”
Joe Smith, on energy level: “It was good, from start to finish. We came out first half, did a good job of building that lead. Unfortunately, we didn’t close out the first half in the way that we would like but I think in the second half we did a good job of getting back to what got us that lead, and we were able to maintain it the rest of the game. The energy was good and our aggressiveness was good.”
Joe Johnson, on Dallas going small: “I think it played a little bit to our advantage, playing small ball with me, Mike and Jamal in the game. I think it’s kind of a win-win for us. Tonight, I think we played pretty good defense. We made shots when we needed to. We got stops down the stretch when we needed to and we pretty much opened it up. We played like we had been earlier in the season.
A couple links:
My updated story with quotes. Jamal Crawford: “If you asked people, they probably would have thought we’d win [Friday] night and lose [Saturday]. It flip-flopped. The league is funny like that sometimes.”
“Great defense and even better offense,” Shawn Marion said of either the Hawks or Joe Johnson in the Dallas Morning News game story.
You may have seen this, but Toronto guard and former Georgia Tech star Jarrett Jack stopped during a game to tie his shoes while holding the ball. I’m not sure what’s worse, that he did it, or that the Bulls let him.
Game story from nba.com.
This is neither here nor there, but former Nebraska football coach Tom Osborne was on my plane from Dallas to Atlanta. I walked past him and knew I recognized him, but didn’t know who it was until someone who was on our plane walked by him after we got off and said, “Safe travels, Coach.”
I suppose you can take away my sports writer card for not recognizing him (there are plenty of other offenses to add to the list). The kind of funny thing is that he and his wife sat in coach. I asked him a couple questions in case our Tech writer could use it. He was cooperative.
218 comments Add your comment
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
12:41 pm
Am I first? Shout out to MV7!! Congrats on the come back.
Saint Richt
December 6th, 2009
12:42 pm
Fire Mike Woodson……………..
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
12:54 pm
Ken Sugiura
Hey Ken, in case no one else has said it, Thanks for stepping up and giving us something to address.
Post Dallas?
Good win, Its a long season. This team is still evolving. It has great character and good unity. Dont let Ken Strickland near them or all hell will break loose. The hate will begin!
Shout out to HC Mike Woodson. Keep up the good work! Way to work the game to game grind. Dont let them get too up or down, and what ever you do ,don’t let the loud negative few, disrupt the beauty and hard work this team is displaying. You guys are doing a great job! Maybe now Sund will find a way to get a real center for you to work the in and out game to perfection. Sund did a great job in Dallas, They have peaked and we are on our way up. We are equal to or better than Dallas now and a center away from competing for a title. This team has great chemistry.
Good Job Woodson and Hawks.
Melvin
December 6th, 2009
12:57 pm
Not pretty but it was a good win in Dallas last night… Hats off to the team…
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
1:00 pm
“You may have seen this, but Toronto guard and former Georgia Tech star Jarrett Jack stopped during a game to tie his shoes while holding the ball. I’m not sure what’s worse, that he did it, or that the Bulls let him.”
Says a lot about those two teams and where they are headed. How much are those guys making? Not one should be a Hawks. What the ‘be nice’ were they thinking?
Ken Strickland
December 6th, 2009
1:11 pm
TRUTH SERUM. Cosign with you on the MVICK shoutout! Continue turning negatives into positives, it sends a good message.
Wow, where were you and all of this love, support and accolades for MWoodson and the team when he completely self destructed with his irratic and uneven coaching in that embarrassing loss to the Knicks?
SAUTEE-FROM THE LAST BLOG. Man, I’d love to meet and have a conversation with you. Absolutely no one recognizes and exposes the hyprocricy and contradictions that’s rather common place among some of our lessor evolved fans better than you my friend.
The micro manager
December 6th, 2009
1:24 pm
Actually I think we should stop and analyze the season in 20 second increments. If he is losing in a 20 second time frame we can fire him and get the next coach in before the time out in over. Forget about a 82 games season and 4 or 5 game streaks, lets analyze every 20 seconds. Good Idea Ken Strickland, get Bob Weiss on the phone and tell him to be on stand by at the next game. – How far under .500 pct is he any way?
The micro manager
December 6th, 2009
1:25 pm
*is over
a 82 game season
Lou Hudson
December 6th, 2009
1:38 pm
I must commend you on this post ” Hawks real fan.”
Hawks real fan.
December 6th, 2009
12:00 am
You know ken, I thought I d list the hundreds of post that have ask you to STFU this year, and I thought I’d mention how many hawks fans have went elsewhere to appreciate the hawks season rather than continue to accept you and your few loud vocal Bubba Crew members who ignore facts and perpetuate your agenda of getting Woodson fired. Then I realize you can’t help yourself at this stage of your sickness.
The enjoyment of the season gets lost in your agenda of attacking Woodson relentlessly and you ask “why do none of the Woodson supporters answer you?”
Most of them are hawks fans and understand basketball, something you are nor and do not. You continue to argue the same tired point over, and over, and over again.Points that have no merit in the grand scheme of things.Like Ken Sugiura previous article “Move on”, there’s a message there if you can hear it.
You ask “why do none of the Woodson supporters answer you?”
Most of them are productive citizens in the community and have more important contributions to make than to address your maladjusted behavior and ignorant rants. That’s why you are likened to Rush Limbaugh. We have jobs, careers, families and communities where we are involved.
THE REASON’S MANY HAWK’S FANS DON’T RESPOND TO YOU?
Woodson has done, and is doing a fine job, so there is no need to respond.
The hawks are right where the experts said they would be. In fourth seed and will win between 47-51 games. Why should we ignore what the experts are saying and give your angry regurgitations more merit?
Although you and the bubba crew may have deceived Ken Sugiura into thinking your views are indicative of a synopsis of this blogs views what he doesn’t know is that most sane and legitimate Hawks fans have left realizing that you and your gang of thugs, have one mission in mind.
Like most of the guys I will go back to ignoring you and your posse, some of which are fictional characters you’ve created.
You have stolen a lot of joy out of this season already. It’s been a good season so far but you can’t tell listening to your negative mouth. In the last week countless people have ask you both gently and harshly to shut up.
You are unable to neither receive correction nor accept that you are wrong, so why bother?
You ask “why do none of the Woodson supporters answer you?”
Perhaps you should ask a psychiatrist
Big Ray
December 6th, 2009
1:45 pm
Win on the road against a good team while shooting 36% from the field and 63% from the line? Ugly though it be, I’ll take that, along with the 6-4 road record.
Joe Smith came up big, which begs the question of his absence in the game against New York, particularly after Smith was ejected. Mayhaps we can find a smidgen more playing time for him, especially in such occasions?
Have to echo MannyT in appreciating Marvin’s effort on the boards, what with him shooting as badly as anybody else. Couldn’t have won the rebounding battle or the game without him.
Nobody was bigger than JJ, who outshot anybody of consequence in the entire game, and led a team that couldn’t buy a basket otherwise, to victory.
In other news….
Greg Oden is clearly cursed. Out for the season. Again. Ouch. WWTBD? (What Will The Blazers Do)
Wonder if Kevin Pritchard ever thinks about Kevin Durant on quiet evenings, over Crown and Coke? Maybe Ron Artest isn’t the only one who drinks at halftime…
Big Ray
December 6th, 2009
1:47 pm
Congrats to Mike Vick on making it back to the NFL.
No congrats to Andy Reid for giving him exactly three or four ineffective touches per game.
But, I’m a diehard Falcons fan so…..I hope he only gets three or four ineffective plays against us and we finally beat Philly, something we had trouble doing while he was here.
But good luck to him during any OTHER Philly games.
RLP
December 6th, 2009
1:48 pm
KEN STRICKLAND:
I got your message from the last thread. Appreciate the kudos. I have no problems whatsoever in discussing the coaching strengths and weaknesses of Woody which you engage in. Most of your criticisms have merit. When you stay on target and discuss those criticisms I could not criticize anything about your posts. I do think it is counter productive when you engage in some of your other tactics such as calling out others as dumb or stupid etc. The people on this blog do not need you to point out when a posting is dumb or stupid. They can figure it out for themselves. Actually based on the reaction of some to criticism of their postings I wonder how in the world they would ever be able to handle all of the criticisms enduring by those in the coaching profession. I am sure most coaches tune out things such as this blog. I guess my biggest peeve would be those who criticize kids in college. That is one reason I love watching pro sports where the athletes are being paid to perform. Why someone would ever criticize a teenage football player is beyond my comprehension.
So anyway keep up your postings. Your viewpoint is appreciated – at least most of the time.
TRUTH-SERUM:
I also appreciate your defenses of Woody. Every thing I wrote to Ken goes for you as well.
MZ. HAWKDAFIED:
I co-sign on your box of chocolates. I think you and I have similar viewpoints on this subject but your description was much more elegant then anything I would have ever have thought to write.
Bob Weiss
December 6th, 2009
1:55 pm
Lou Hudson, we are in the same boat.
BOB WEISS
December 6th, 2009
2:01 pm
I mean to say we are really in the same skull. We both obsess over the same person because we are hypocritical beyond all manner of rational thought. How can we talk about not responding to ken when that is all we do. We need to call a subcommittee of all our personalities and discuss this like rational people, er, person. We will have to vote on which personality gets to do all the posting under one name and the others have to stay quiet. I vote for truth serum because he makes the most sense. I like you lou hudson, but you have racial tendencies just like me and some of the others. We both have trouble talking just basketball. At least truth serum only complains about Al horford instead of other bloggers. Joe mama is okay but he gets wacked out too sometimes. At least people will talk to truth serum but they know the others are bat sh!t crazy so they get tired of them real fast. So when are we going to call the subcomittee of personalities. I’m hungry, and two of them have to take a sh!t. Can we hurry it up please.
KevinA
December 6th, 2009
2:16 pm
It was good to see the amount of 3 pt shots attempted down. 10 would be a better average that the 18 we average now. Looked like Woody was explaining to Crawford his displeasure on one of the 3 pt shots.
Woody also seems better at yanking players when they are cold, except for JJ of course. It was good to see JJ get back on track.
I thought those flagrant 1’s energized Josh. He played great after that. When he is not on track, we really struggle.
JeJe
December 6th, 2009
2:17 pm
lol MARVIN HAD 3 POINTS LAST NIGHT.
IN 36 MINUTES
BOB WEISS
December 6th, 2009
2:18 pm
Ken you can use my name to post confusion all you want, as long as you plug and play my name for the coaching vacancy when you get woodson fired, Have you talked to OJ lately? I hope he gets out soon to help me and you with our plan… I promise I’ll make you assistant coach just like you asked!
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
2:21 pm
Is any body going to mention that Allen Iverson is back with Philly?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/basketball/nba/wires/12/06/2030.ap.bkn.76ers.iverson.1st.ld.writethru.0510/
ILL-logical
December 6th, 2009
2:22 pm
Mr.Sugiura,
Thanks for the new blog- the links are very helpful in getting some additiona; perspectives on the team and its performance. Hope that the new beat writer follows thas practice.
glad that the ajc management invested the resources to enable you to cover the game as well. A big deal in these times. Keep us posted.
ILL-logical
December 6th, 2009
2:23 pm
Mr.Sugiura,
Thanks for the new blog- the links are very helpful in getting some additional perspectives on the team and its performance. Hope that the new beat writer follows this practice.
Glad that the ajc management invested the resources to enable you to cover the game as well. A big deal in these times. Keep us posted
O'Brien
December 6th, 2009
3:02 pm
Thanks for the blog Ken.
Lose at home to the Knicks, beat Dallas in Dallas. The Hawks are so inconsistent, and its partly Woody’s fault. Sometimes we play uptempo, sometimes he utilizes his bench, sometimes the switching defense is minimized. I just hope we can become more consistent as the season goes on. It was a good win, but I didnt like the fact that JJ took 31 shots to get 24 points.
That being said, Hawks deserved the win, and I hope we can use it as a springboard to go on a nice winning streak again. Keep it going Hawks.
MyView
December 6th, 2009
3:40 pm
A win is a win. Especially a division leader on the road. I don’t care about the details, when the ultimate goal was accomplished.
Pretty good work Ken S.
Undisputed Champ!
December 6th, 2009
3:59 pm
Great game MV7!
KevinA
December 6th, 2009
4:00 pm
To follow on a theme when we struggle, even in wins, the bigs went 14-34 and the guards went 17-47. The main reason we pulled out the Dallas win was 20 extra shots from turnovers, rebounds etc.
The next 7 games are against teams with a worse record, a good time to make a move up the standings.
4 keys
Feed a big day, every game, better balance
Ball movement
Cut three pt. shots in half.
More up tempo offense
BOB WEISS
December 6th, 2009
4:11 pm
Mike Vick got to play against a rotten defense decimated by injuries. This is a triumphant return? I’ll tell you what a return is. When you can take the starting quarterback’s job and lead the team to victory. But that isnt going to happen because Vick isnt good enough to do it. He will return to the sideline for the rest of the season, getting his two plays a game just like it has been. The Eagles won the game before Vick ever even got in to play. They were just “throwing him a bone” pun intended, so he could look good for once this year after not letting his sorry azz play more than a snap or two every game. Vick used to be real good. Nowadasy he isnt. End of story. Eagles win because of mcNabb.
Stankonia
December 6th, 2009
4:14 pm
lol MARVIN HAD 3 POINTS LAST NIGHT.
IN 36 MINUTES
He had 15 rebounds too you idiot.
KevinA
December 6th, 2009
4:15 pm
http://www.humanhighlightblog.com/2009/12/torn-between-outcome-and-philosophy.html
correctly unsettling
Stankonia
December 6th, 2009
4:21 pm
So true, especially the part about J-J-J-J- Joooooooeeeee Johnson ball hog supreme and killer of pick and rolls
Stankonia
December 6th, 2009
4:22 pm
what a leader he is
Mychelfromatl
December 6th, 2009
5:17 pm
JeJe –
“lol MARVIN HAD 3 POINTS LAST NIGHT. IN 36 MINUTES”
____________________________________________________________
Dude, he also had a career rebounding night (including some crucial offensive boards). Marvin also played great defense all night. SMH at your slanted reporting…you must work for FOX News Network SMH.
Melvin
December 6th, 2009
5:34 pm
Shaq had 1 reb vs the Bucks today. My goodness, at his size and height. I think at least 2 rebs would fall in his hands without even blocking out…
Ken Strickland
December 6th, 2009
6:58 pm
RLP-When I use the words stupid and ignorant, I’m referencing a very select and limited number of individuals, and these fools know exactly who he/they are. Haven’t you noticed whenever I make a strong point and use those descriptive words, even though I don’t mention any names, we immediately get these retaliatory and often vulgar responses, like the ones above, from the same multiple names? And all of these names emanate from the same dilusional and extremely sick mind of the person commonly referred to as TRUTH SERUM. Also, I cosign on your stance concerning college athletes. That’s why I’ve never had an ounce of respect for Woodson’s college coach and mentor, Bobby Knight. It’s been proven you can win, and win big, on the college level without being a dehumanizing tyrant. That’s probably why the 2 best basketball players to ever enroll at Indiana U, IThomas and LBird, got the hell out of there early.
I’ve been heavily criticized for being very critical of Woodson’s shortcomings as the Hawks HC, and I admit that I’ve been critical of him for sometime now. Why, because I think it’s a sad and revealing comentary on the ability of any HC, that’s going into his 6th yr of coaching the same team, when fans are expected to praise him when he uses his bench, gives his young PG mins, calls a timeout to correct a veteran player, makes a strategic move or adjustment, or occasionally allows his team to play the style of OFF they’re best suited to play. Good qualified NBA HC’s do these things routinely, and we’re routinely expected to praise Woodson for doing them occasionally.
FORGIVE ME FOR HAVING MORE INTELLIGENCE AND INSIGHT TO CONTINUE FALLING FOR THAT CRAP.
MELVIN-Shaq had only one rebound, Wow? Our undersized, playing out of position center has never been that futile. That should send the message to the proponents of us getting a bigger taller so called true center, that it takes more than just size and height to get the job done at the center position, even for a future HOF center.
MWilliams was instramental in more than the 15 rebounds he captured. He knocked out several and contested several more that were eventually secured by a teammate. He was going after everything.
RLP
December 6th, 2009
7:54 pm
K
Sautee
December 6th, 2009
8:16 pm
Ken Strickland,
In the interest of fact checking…… Bird went to Indiana State.
That doesn’t mean you weren’t correct about Knight’s bullying. You were.
RLP
December 6th, 2009
8:32 pm
KEN STRICKLAND:
So do you continue to belief that the other people who read this blog but whom you are not addressing by these names are too ignorant or stupid to figure out exactly who you are talking about? I guess we should just agree to disagree on this point and go on to another topic.
From my standpoint I think each year is different and must be addressed based on what is going on in that particular year. This year the Hawks have acquired Jeff Teague, Joe Smith and Jamal Crawford who are significant components of this year’s team. As I pointed out earlier this team overall has performed (so far) at a franchise best level considering only their won and lost record. If you want to criticize all of Woody’s failures then you have to also give him some measure of praise for the team’s successes.
The team has won more games on the road than any other team during Woody’s tenure. They have had more significant wins against really good teams on the road than anytime in the near past. And yes they have failed to take care of business against some weaker opponents. I imagine it is very difficult to learn how to fit all of the teams features together easily especially when so many parts of that team are mixed up with new members. I would imagine that it has been especially hard for JJ since he has been the featured prime time player for so long. It is hard to change the role you have had for so long. I imagine it has been especially hard for Jamal Crawford coming to a new team and no longer being a featured offensive threat but instead being relegated to the role of sixth man and having a coach who is asking him to play defense. I imagine it has to be hard for Jeff Teague to come into the pro’s without knowing exactly what his status will be and how he will fit in. I imagine it must be hard for Marvin Williams to see his role diminished as JC gets more playing time at his expense. ZaZa has also seen his role change as he adjusts to Joe Smith getting some of the burn he would normally have received. Bibby’s role requires an adjustment with the arrival of JC also. About the only people who have not been adversely affected by the changing roles are Josh and Al. Both of them seem to have thrived with the arrival of the new personnel. So for all of the faults many perceive Woody having there are things going on with this team that does require a period of adjustment. And yet this team has shown a new level of maturity. Last year’s team did not adjust well to the injury to Josh and the loss in Boston that changed the perception of the team. This year’s team does seem to be doing a better job of handling adversity. Sure there have been a few bad games. The four game stretch that ended with the Knicks game is one example. But even here they won one game during that stretch that last year they would have surely lost. And before we forget the euphoria of the opening stretch how many of you remember that in some of those games the team would open very lackadaisical in the first half only to really tighten down the defensive hatches come the fourth quarter.
I continue to believe that this year’s team may have a chance to be very special. I am not claiming that they are an “Elite” team yet. I will claim that they are on the cusp of becoming an elite team. And you never know when lightening will strike in a bottle. Special years happen occasionally. So for all of you out there who come on this blog and only want to complain and gripe about JJ or Marvin or Woody or poor offensive execution remember that there are at least a few of us who are really more concerned about enjoying a team playing at times with great ball movement and a sense of joy and purpose. One that offers an emerging star in Josh and an undersized center with more heart than almost any player I can remember playing on this team. And if this team sets a franchise record for most wins who will appreciate it more? Those who spend the entire season complaining about the teams faults or those who take delights in its highlights?
ILL-logical
December 6th, 2009
8:37 pm
Sautee
December 6th, 2009
8:16 pm
Ken Strickland,
In the interest of fact checking…… Bird went to Indiana State.
Bird originally signed and attended IU but dropped out and returned home. After some time he enrolled at ISU.
Ken Strickland
December 6th, 2009
8:40 pm
SAUTEE-Before attending Indiana State, LBird enrolled at Indiana Univ, but promptly left after getting a taste of the real BKnight. He took a job collecting garbage when the Indiana State basketball coach saw him and persuaded him to come there and play for him. And the rest is history.
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
9:17 pm
RLP , Ill cosign it. Its my own sentiments it would be nice to enjoy the beauty of what the hawks have accomplished, and what they are accomplishing. We are their fans. When they win we win, win they lose we lose. We are part of the team, the sixth man in the stands. They have set such a good example of unity inspite of all those adversities you’ve mentioned and some you left off. Perhaps we can follow their leadership and unite with them as a team, weaknesses and strengths. Sure, Id like to see us strengthen the post. But that doesn’t mean I don’t think Al is giving all he can or isnt a great person. He is a blue collar guy and I would love to keep him right here on the hawks, Ive always said that. I also say that we need a starting center to enforce the post and Al is not the man for the Job. I’m not saying get rid of Al. I’m saying lets get what we need to crack the top three and become an elite team. No hate here.
Shout out to MV7!!!
Great Job and next year you will be back. I hope you get with a team that can use a top notch QB….Like Atlanta.
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
9:28 pm
Out side of ken and the bubba crew here is what others are saying about woodson, not to mention that he is still number # 2 on this years coach of the year poll. I think the negative view being regurgitated is the minority view mostly limited to this sites hate cell.
* All-Star
* Group: Squawkers
* Posts: 3,499
* Joined: 23-August 05
* Location:Clarksville, TN/Ft. Campbell, KY area
Posted 14 November 2009 – 12:22 PM
Mike Woodson is the NBA Coach of the Year.
There are a variety of things that has brought this about:
- He coaches Joe Johnson like he’s a superstar, which in turn, brings out the max in the Hawks Captain. Yes, we all know that JJ doesn’t have the talent of the 4 or 5 superstars in this league, but Woody coaches him like he is. The offensive and defensive responsibilities he puts on JJ has made him a more dangerous player that other teams have to treat with superstar attention.
But more importantly, it has made him a more mentally tougher player. While the 3 point shot isn’t there so far this year, the Captain is grinding every night, doing all he can to lead his team to victory . . even rebounding the basketball. And on the defensive end, Woody doesn’t hesitate to put JJ on the other teams best perimeter player, to try to slow or shut him down.
Superstar responsibility = a more dangerous Joe Johnson.
- It is Woody that has told this team as a whole, to drive the basketball whenever they can. Josh Smith has most been affected by this mindset, seeing that he’s a highly efficient offensive player now. LOL . . let me say that again. Josh Smith is now a highly efficient offensive player. While Jamal Crawford loves his jumpshot, even he is driving the ball to the hole at a much higher rate than he ever has. This has led to his efficiency as a ballplayer increasing.
The Hawks are #1 in the NBA in points in the paint. Let me say that again as well. The Hawks are #1 in the NBA in points in the paint. This is a complete contrast to a team that used to live to jack up long jumpers. Even Captain Johnson has laid off the 22 footer, and looked to get in the painted area to take his shot.
- He has not succumbed to the pressure of playing Teague, ( a guy who simply might not be ready yet ), a lot of minutes off the bench. Because of veteran guards like Bibby,Crawford, and Mo Evans on the roster to compliment JJ, he isn’t forced to throw Teague right into the fire. He knows that he’ll need Teague before the season is over, but he isn’t going to force feed the kid either.
- He has managed the Hawks rotation as well as he ever has in his career. While not only succumbing to not forcing minutes for Teague, he has also coached games more sensibly. While having the ability to go 10 deep, he’s using his depth according to the opponent we play. He’s not feeling obligated to give guys a set number of nightly minutes. Instead, he’s dishing out the minutes ( especially in the 2nd half ), according to how the Hawks match up against the other team.
And when the fan base were calling for the reduction of Mike Bibby’s minutes, he stuck right with Bibby, and his numbers now reflect the shooting he exhibited last season in November, with Bibby shooting in the mid 40% FG and over 40% 3FG.
The most important move, is the use of the 3-guard lineup of Bibby, Crawford, and Johnson. He’s using this lineup as his 2nd half offensive catalyst and possible closing lineup. The 4th quarter dominance of the Hawks can directly be credited to this move. With JJ and Crawford being very good shot creators, and Bibby being a deadly 3 point shooter, it prevents teams from employing alot of double teams against the Hawks. He’s smart enough not to start this group though, because the 3 guards do tend to dominate the ball, which would lessen the touches of Josh Smith and Horford.
All in all, Woody ( at least for 3 weeks ), has been one of the best coaches in the league. Because of that, he gets my early vote for Coach of the Year.
Great job Woody.
You guys can find this on hawks squawk.
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
9:29 pm
NOTHING LIKE A POSITIVE PRO HAWK ARTICLE.
Ken Strickland
December 6th, 2009
9:32 pm
RLP-you obviously didn’t know who I was talking about or you likely wouldn’t have made it an issue, and that certainly isn’t an indication of any lack of intelligence on your part.
I’ve given Woodson credit more than once for holding this team together, keeping them focused and playing hard during the early yrs when all of the distractions with he and former GM BKnight and ownership were at their peak. I’ve also given him credit for perservering during times when the talent level, experience and maturity were in short supply and player turnover rather high(although he was partly responsible for that). The magnitude of those contribution alone cannot be measured. However, we’re way past the point where turmoil, lack of talent, maturity and experience are issues.
Going into his 6th yr as HC, we’re at the point now where I expect this team to have an identity, an established style of play, and for him to have an idea of how to develop young players, manage players mins and effectively utilize a deep, talented, experienced, versatile and more than adequately stocked bench.
The positive contributions Woodson has made to the success of this team in the past, and it’s winning record, still can’t erase the inexplicable lack of strategy, adjustments, bench use, player development, OFF/DEF inconsistency and the long periods of feast and famine this team has been going through the last 2-3yrs. CERTAINLY NOT AFTER 6YRS AS HC.
I look at it like this. MELVIN informed us that Shaq, a former Allstar and future HOFer recently managed to get only 1 rebound . The fact that Shaq has led 2 teams to multiple NBA titles in his past doesn’t excuse the rebounding futility he’s going through now. GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR WHAT HE’S DONE IN THE PAST, BUT HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT HE’S NOT DOING TO HELP HIS TEAM NOW!
Pat Riley and PJackson have both won multiple NBA titles and both are sure fire HOFer’s. Yet, both were fired from the very teams they led to NBA titles. YOU DON’T HANG ON TO A COACH, NO MATTER WHAT HIS PAST ACCOMPLISHMENTS ARE, IF HE’S NOT CURRENTLY DOING WHAT’S NECESSARY TO GET THE TEAM WHERE IT WANTS OR NEEDS TO BE. It appears that a number of Atlanta fans have low expectations for the team and the franchise, which is likely why we have such a sorry and uneven history of success. Well, I’m not one of them. Instead of settling, I’m going to demand more of the team and the HC, no matter who that HC might be.
darrell starks
December 6th, 2009
9:54 pm
KEN go check out the falcon blog man i cant believe how much racism still exist.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!
darrell starks
December 6th, 2009
9:58 pm
I NO WE DISAGREE ALOT ON THE HAWKS BLOG BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY WE RESPECT ONE ANOTHER THATS WHY I LOVE THE HAWKS BLOG.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
10:18 pm
“YOU DON’T HANG ON TO A COACH, NO MATTER WHAT HIS PAST ACCOMPLISHMENTS ARE, IF HE’S NOT CURRENTLY DOING WHAT’S NECESSARY TO GET THE TEAM WHERE IT WANTS OR NEEDS TO BE.”
Atlanta Hawks 14 6 .700 2.0 7-4 2-2 8-2 6-4 6-4 W 1
almost all of the experts project the hawks to win 47-51 games and be seeded some where 4-7
current pace 57 games.
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
10:20 pm
Creating a controversy where non exists is evil.
bigdave
December 6th, 2009
10:32 pm
darrell starks…
they had to shut it down… it was crazy..
the funny thing is how cowardly most of it was; hiding behind metaphors and drawing parallelism, instead of just saying what they wanted to say or how they really feel.
niremetal
December 6th, 2009
10:33 pm
Ray – agreed on JoeS. He’s probably the most versatile player we have on the bench, due in no small part to his high basketball IQ. Woody should find more minutes for him, and I’m somewhat surprised that he hasn’t already.
O’Brien – you got it backwards. JJ took 24 shots to get 31 points. That’s actually pretty damned efficient, especially for a backcourt player.
Sautee – great post on the last blog. As for your only one so far on this one, it looks like a couple others beat me to it
. In the interest of further fact checking, though, I’ve never read anything (and I’ve read 1 bio of Bird plus his autobio) that indicated that Knight was even in the top 5 reasons that Bird left IU. The size of the campus, treatment of Kent Benson (a well-known jackass), and just general homesickness were the main reasons.
JeJe
December 6th, 2009
10:42 pm
Some thoughts:
Woodson should not be acclaimed for winning 50+ this year. He is only using 6 players MOSTLY in his rotation
second, someone was spot on the other night about Joe. Other ppl like Kobe and DW3 will have 17 going into the 4th and you’ll wonder “what the heck? I thought he had like 6.” When Joe scores 25 it’s because he took 20+ Shots
FIRE WOODSON. ANY COACH CAN WIN WITH A 6-7 MAN ROTATION IN THE REGULAR SEASON WITH THIS TEAM
JeJe
December 6th, 2009
10:48 pm
IF WE LOSE TO NJN NEXT SUNDAY, IT’S BECAUSE WOODSON WILL STUCK WITH OUR SUPERSTAR AL HORFORD ON BROOK LOPEZ, AND LOPEZ WILL DROP 30 AND 15 ON HIM.
WOODSON WILL REFUSE TO USE COLLINS OR ZAZA ENOUGH (OR AT ALL) AND WE WILL LOSE BECAUSE OF A BROOKS LOPEZ FIELD DAY. REFER BACK TO THIS COMMENT ON 12/6/09 AT 10:47 pm IN 7 DAYS TIME
Rod from College Park
December 6th, 2009
10:51 pm
JeJe
lol MARVIN HAD 3 POINTS LAST NIGHT.
IN 36 MINUTES
Agreed. Some of these clowns actually state because he had a good rebounding game he did a great job. Wow. We will see what they think when the playoffs start, and Joe is triple teamed, and the one guy (Marvin) who is left wide open, or guarded by guys 3 to 4 inches smaller than him can’t score. 3 points. LOL.
Nicky
December 6th, 2009
11:01 pm
Medium Sized Ray – I refuse to use the adjective Big for anyone who congratulates that degenerate M. Vick for anything. Mayhaps you can stay on topic. This is a Hawks blog.
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:04 pm
Vick Kick Butt In the ATL…This is still Vicks house!
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:07 pm
Lopez will get that Azzzzzzza!
Horford better do some push ups. Lopez will take his lunch money. No body on the Hawks can stop him. Tell woodson to suit up if you want JeJe.
Lopez will show you what a center is about.
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:08 pm
Al aint no super star, if he was he d man the center against a real center!
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:11 pm
Where are all the Woody haters at? Its after midnight, don’t you guys come out of your caves looking for blood or something? Come get this silver bullet…..
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:12 pm
OK its 11:11 I’ll be back.
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:15 pm
Al is our center Lopez is their’s, Al is suppose to guard him.
Grandad
December 6th, 2009
11:42 pm
niremetal – You are correct sir: L. Bird is on record saying “his leaving had nothing to to with Knight”.
As for Coach Knight he is on the one hand as intelligent as any coach you’ll ever meet. However, on the other, he has a penchant for self destruction. It would be very difficult to find more than a few malcontents that give nothing but praise for the man. His grad. rate and the fact they were never on prob. under his watch speaks volumes.
Yet, in the final analysis his inability to maintain self-discipline
within himself is a paradox, given that discipline was a staple of his coaching philosophy.
What is odd to me, is that mr.w., seems to have none of the same coaching rudiments as CBK. ‘With one exception’ his attempt to *coach
[*used loosely] by intimidation and bullying.
Ken Strickland – Please do not put me in the category of
‘Horford critic’. I certainly am one who constantly wants
reenforcement [defensely] in the middle. But Al can collect rebs. whether @ the [4] or [5].
Just to throw a little kindlin’ on the fire; here’s anothe name for my
long, ath., high energy defender to roam the middle list. Joakim Noah.
Let’s go get ‘im. I feel like “Diesal” from the ‘Squawk”.
Do not forget [marv critics] when Al, Marv, or anyone else rebs. then someone is most likely blocking out. Although I have not watched specifically, I suspect Marv is a good blocker outer. Zaza is our best in that dept.! Zaza; very underrated, does alot of little things to help us win. He is an underutilized [traditional] post scorer. Many times he’s open and some of our guys (you figure out who) do not feed the post.
Grandad
December 6th, 2009
11:57 pm
JeJe and TS: you’re on. Big Al wears him out. Lopez can’t catch him.
Even if I prefer Al at the [4] he’s still the 2nd best [5] in the East.
And if you’re cOY continues to go with him why are you not supporting the cOY.
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
1:09 am
GRANDAD-definitely didn’t have you in mind when I made that remark. However, you actually made my point for me when you said, “BUT AL CAN COLLECT REBS. WHETHER @ THE [4]OR[5]. So let him continue doing his thing at the 5.
What’s all this crazy obcession with BLopez? Isn’t he the starting center of the NBA’s worse team? Consider this comparison of stats:
LOPEZ/HORFORD
MINS-36.2/34.2, PTS-18.9/13.6, RB-9.2/9.8, BLKS-2.26/1.45, AST-1.7/2.0, STL-.53/.65, TO-2.74/1.3, FGA-279/195. FG%-.447/.569.
Since Lopez plays on the NBA’s worse team and is their primary scoring and rebounding option, his numbers, especially his OFF numbers, are obviously skewed compared to Horfords. There definitely isn’t a single team altering difference between Lopez’ overall stats and Horfords. And if he came here he definitely wouldn’t be a top scoring option, so his OFF numbers would definitely be lowered. When you take all of this into consideration, exactly what do we get from Lopez that’s so far and away above what we’re already getting from Horford that would improve this team exponentially?
I don’t understand why so many of you are so hung up on this OUT OF POSITION OR TRUE CENTER OR UNDERSIZED MESS. HORFORD IS GETTING THE JOB DONE BETTER THAN THE MAJORITY OF THE CENTERS IN THE NBA AND HE’S GETTING IT DONE DESPITE ALL OF YOUR LABELS, OPINIONS AND PERCEPTIONS OF HIM AND WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO.
There are definitely some other things we can do to improve this team without having to trade anyone.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
2:15 am
K.S.:
I’m perfectly happy with Big Al at the [5]. Reenforcements are what I am looking for. I suspect that I am looking at it from a different perspective.
Think about this: Al and Josh @ the forward positions, with a rangy athlete in the middle. Now that would force mr.w. to rely less on a perimeter/3 pt. shooting game. Of course Josh would have to be a slasher at the [3]. A real coach would demand that he only shoot off the offense and not launch 3’s.
We would still be able to play a 3 guard offense by returning Josh and Al to their old spots and playing Joe @ the 3.[or Marv]
Another thing a real coach could do is dictate to the other team which
team he wants on the floor by going Big or quick, rather than as mr.w. does which means letting the other team dictate to him [knicks].
None of this is anti Marv. I really like the young man in every respect. I do not think under the current set of circumstances that he will ever reach his full potential here.
As far as trades go, maybe Bibby will have to go before J.Teague will ever get his chance.
As we stand right now, I must agree with people, we are a 4 seed or worse. But it is time right now to challenge. Our guys are either in or nearing their prime. Treading water does not cut it. No more excuses about we are young. Those days are over. To quote a famous American:
“Git ‘er done” !
RaJaH
December 7th, 2009
4:04 am
If the hawks could get a real center, he would be on the perimeter defending guards just like Al.
niremetal
December 7th, 2009
7:28 am
If the hawks could get a real center, he would be on the perimeter defending guards just like Al.
Yup…although I think Al already is a real center.
doc
December 7th, 2009
8:02 am
Truth-Serum
December 6th, 2009
2:21 pm
Is any body going to mention that Allen Iverson is back with Philly?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/basketball/nba/wires/12/06/2030.ap.bkn.76ers.iverson.1st.ld.writethru.0510/
truth the answer is …. only those that wish or want to risk being irrelevant?
Sautee
December 7th, 2009
8:21 am
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
10:20 pm
“Creating a controversy where non exists is evil.”
Well…… if THAT’S true, then
So what about this, is THIS evil?:
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:04 pm
“Vick Kick Butt In the ATL…This is still Vicks house!”
Brain Farting at the idiot club.
December 6th, 2009
11:07 pm
“Lopez will get that Azzzzzzza!”
“Horford better do some push u”ps. Lopez will take his lunch money. No body on the Hawks can stop him. Tell woodson to suit up if you want JeJe.”
We’re 14-6 with Horford at Center. Is it evil to make a center controversy where there is none? Woody sure likes Horford as his Center.
Lopez will show you what a center is about.
jeje
December 7th, 2009
9:36 am
Al iS NOT the 2nd best center in the East
1) Dwight 2) Brook 3) Jermaine O’Neal (everyone can hate on this guy, but have u seen him this year?), 4) probably Shaq
WHEN BROOK DROPS 30 AND 15 ON OUR SELF-PROCLAIMED SUPERSTAR ON SUNDAY, COME THANK ME FOR INFORMING U. WE WILL only beat THE LOWLY NETS BECAUSE IT’S A HOME GAME.
LOL. 30 AND 15 AND 4 BLOCKS AGAINST HORFORD. WHAT WILL WOODY DO? NOTHING. HE’LL PLAY AL 40 MINUTES A GAME SINCE OUR STARTING 5 IS APPARENTLY OUR BEST COMBINATINO OF PLAYERS VS. EVERY TEAM IN THIS LEAGUE
WHY THE HELL DOES ASG SPEND MONEY ON COLLINS IF HE IS NOT GOING TO PLAY?
FIRE MIKE WOODSON
AND LOL @ JJ TAKING 24 SHOTS FOR 31 POINTS. THATS WHY U NEVER HEAR ABOUT KOBE OR DWADE HAVING 17 THRU 3 QTRS. THEY DO IT BUT STILL HELP THEIR TEAMS AND THEIR FGA ARE LOW. JOE HAS TO TAKE 50 % OF THE SHOTS IN ORDER FOR HIM TO HELP HIS !@#$DAMN EGO
jeje
December 7th, 2009
9:36 am
DEVIN HARRIS = QUICK PG.
BROOK = BIG THAT WOODSON WILL REFUSE TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AGAIN
MARK IT DOWN. HAWKS LOSE ON SUNDAY
jeje
December 7th, 2009
9:37 am
DEVIN HARRIS = QUICK PG.
BROOK = BIG THAT WOODSON WILL REFUSE TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AGAIN
MARK IT DOWN. HAWKS LOSE ON SUNDAY.
jeje
December 7th, 2009
9:38 am
HARRIS IS SO QUICK THAT WE WILL JUST LEAVE BIBBY AND CRAWFORD TO ROT.
LOL @ THIS TEAM HAVING THE RECORD IT HAS. GARBAGE COACH WHO WEARS OUT STARTERS IN ORDER TO GET WINS.
WHAT A JOKE
THIS TEAM IS A TEASE
jeje
December 7th, 2009
9:41 am
LOL ROD FROM CP. MARVIN DOESNT EVEN MAKE JUMPSHOTS ANYMORE. USELESS PIECE OF TRASH. I’D RATHER HAVE RUBEN PATTERSON. AT LEAST HE ACTUALLY HAS SOME ATTITUDE IN HIS GAME. MARVIN DRIVES LANE, THROWS UP SOME WILD HOOK WHICH IS BLOCKED 0.43 SECONDS AFTER LEAVING HIS HANDS LOL. AT LEAST HE HASNT GOTTEN INJURED YET. 7.5 MILLION A YEAR TO GET REBOUNDS AGAINST A TEAM THAT DIDNT EVEN HAVE JOSH HOWARD. WOW
Dom 'the Don' Wilkins
December 7th, 2009
9:47 am
Wednesday night, Horfy goes to war with Noah. I can’t stand that little Chia Pet Hair looking gator. Horfy will dominate, HEAT CHECK!
Daniel
December 7th, 2009
9:56 am
Here we are after 20 games, so I like to look at the season in those kind of blocks. 14-6 is pretty darn good, actually has us on pace to win 56/7 games, which is honestly still better than I predicted. I don’t know if it will be enough to crack the top three in the East. What do you guys think?
I would like for the Hawks to go 14/15 wins again over the next 20 games, and I will now be watching more closely to a player rotation being developed. What are you guys watching for over the next 20?
jeje- the Nets are the worst team in the NBA at a historic level. You obviously know absolutely nothing about basketball, most certainly winning basketball. Please actually pay attention to the games, instead of just watching a sportscenter highlight and looking at the game stats. The Hawks are not a joke, you are.
Mike is Back
December 7th, 2009
10:16 am
KenSur, those are great questions pose to Woody…I thought he made some excellent responses. I think he is wise not to rush Teague…When you got big shot Bibby and Crawford…why not bring him alone slow.
Teague IS GOING TO BE A BIG GAME PLAYER…in my book…BUT I’M A TEAM GUY FIRST…and base on that Woody is doing a heluva job thus far.
There will be stretches where Teague will carries this team during the season…but first he go to put in work. I said Teague would probably handle the DNPs and spotty minutes better than the previous guys…I was right…the KID has charisma…you can’t teach that.
These, ain’t yo momma HAWKS FOLKS!!!
There is some TRUTH…IN THAT SERUM. lol
DOC, NC has reloaded…I seen the game between Kentucky and North Carolina this weekend…man they were competing at tournament level…that was a GREAT GAME. Kentucky was pushed to their limit…those may be THE TWO TEAMS TO WATCH.
It will be interesting to see GT and NC lock up…tell YO BOYS…they had better be ready…by mid-season NC might be unbeatable…and u no I’m with WF folk. Some much for NC dropping off…they don upgraded brooooooooooooo.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
11:40 am
Mike is Back – LOL…
Jeje, I cant see that there is anything Woodson can do to help Horford in his assignment(I guess he could suit up-LOL). Last time I checked Horford is our starting center and the best man on this team for the position. I think Collins makes the veteran’s minimum and his talent level shows why. Our best bet “is” with Horford. I agree that there is a large difference in Horford’s ability and Lopez’s. We cant hid from it nor mother Horford’s character. Our shortness in the post is a resounding message that opponents exploit. Its something we have to address if we will become serious contenders, and shielding Horford is to ignore the truth of this condition. In the loss against the knicks the opposition scored 60 points in the paint not because its a strong point for them but because its a weak point for us. I can see teams now strategising to get josh out the game and thereby insuring the high percentage low post baskets.
Our low post weakness is what will prevent us from getting to the higher levels. Horford cant hide from it, woodson cant, Sund cant, JeJe cant.
Good JobMV7
JeJe
December 7th, 2009
11:43 am
Daniel,
You are an f’ing moron. How dare you make any judgments about me. I’ve been to hundreds of Hawks games in the past few years and have posted on Hawks blogs for a very long time.
Who gives a sh*t if they are the worst team in the NBA at a historic level? We have lost to the f’ing Knicks, Hornets (sans Chris Paul), Bobcats, and Pistons, all while we were at full health or close.
But according to you, I don’t watch the Hawks games. LOL, and who the HELL are you, exactly? Brook Lopez destroys us every time he plays us, and we know that Woodson DOES NOT use his backup bigs enough or efficiently. Why don’t you look at Brook Lopez’s game log this year and notice he has 24+ points in a ton of games.
In addition, Devin Harris is too fast for any player on this team to guard. I am worried about that game and there’s a good chance we lose it.
IT’S MY OPINION.
Why don’t you go to another blog and go piss off
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
11:51 am
DANIEL-14-6 is a winning record, but to focus on that exclusively and not consider the problems we’re now having is like falling in love with fools gold. You can’t use our current record to predict our potential won/loss record, and here’s why. After the 1st 13gms we were 11-2, but we’re 3-4 over the last 7gms, and we’ve completely stopped doing all of the things that led us to that 11-2 start.
How many more 20gm stretches can we expect to win 11 our of the 1st 13, including a 7gm winning streak? Right now we’re so inconsistent and confused we’re failing to be competitive against some of the NBA’s worse teams. And it would be foolish to think we’ve come out of our overall funk based on the win in Dallas. Remember what happened after we completely demolished Toronto?
Focusing exclusively on the won/loss record and ignoring the internal problems is like driving a car and ignoring it needs maintenance, or something is wrong, as long as it’s still running. You know something is going to go wrong if you don’t do something so why not address the problem before it gets worse and starts to affect other systems.
We’ve stopped playing the style of ball and making the moves that led to our awsome start. We’re now playing WOODY BALL, which has had a negative effect on every phase of the gm in which we were previously dominant, and we’ve become inconsistent and far too often noncompetitive.
WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR SOME TO RECOGNIZE AND ACCEPT THAT SINCE WE’VE STARTED PLAYING WOODY BALL, WE’RE NOW HAVING TROUBLE DOING THE VERY THINGS WE WERE LEADING OR NEAR THE TOP OF THE NBA IN DOING EARLIER?
Give it a rest!
December 7th, 2009
11:56 am
Yes, you!
Grady, Mental Staff.
December 7th, 2009
11:57 am
Ken, would you like to drop by for milk and cookies?
Give it a rest!
December 7th, 2009
12:00 pm
Its all about winning. Winning. Just win baby. win,win,win. Just win. do it. win!
Give it a rest!
December 7th, 2009
12:00 pm
Its all about winning. Winning. Just win baby. win,win,win. Just win. do it. win! Winning is not overrated. What the hell are we playing for any way?
Give it a rest!
December 7th, 2009
12:03 pm
Id rather play Woody ball than no experience or understanding “ken” ball.” Quit b!tching because Woody wont play”ken” ball. Woody is a proven professional, you are a mental case in denial.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
12:08 pm
Give it a rest! the best thing about this team is the way they stepped up on the road. This is a super plus and a Major improvement. You must have just got here so Ill share this post with you just in case you missed it.
Posted 14 November 2009 – 12:22 PM
Mike Woodson is the NBA Coach of the Year.
There are a variety of things that has brought this about:
- He coaches Joe Johnson like he’s a superstar, which in turn, brings out the max in the Hawks Captain. Yes, we all know that JJ doesn’t have the talent of the 4 or 5 superstars in this league, but Woody coaches him like he is. The offensive and defensive responsibilities he puts on JJ has made him a more dangerous player that other teams have to treat with superstar attention.
But more importantly, it has made him a more mentally tougher player. While the 3 point shot isn’t there so far this year, the Captain is grinding every night, doing all he can to lead his team to victory . . even rebounding the basketball. And on the defensive end, Woody doesn’t hesitate to put JJ on the other teams best perimeter player, to try to slow or shut him down.
Superstar responsibility = a more dangerous Joe Johnson.
- It is Woody that has told this team as a whole, to drive the basketball whenever they can. Josh Smith has most been affected by this mindset, seeing that he’s a highly efficient offensive player now. LOL . . let me say that again. Josh Smith is now a highly efficient offensive player. While Jamal Crawford loves his jumpshot, even he is driving the ball to the hole at a much higher rate than he ever has. This has led to his efficiency as a ballplayer increasing.
The Hawks are #1 in the NBA in points in the paint. Let me say that again as well. The Hawks are #1 in the NBA in points in the paint. This is a complete contrast to a team that used to live to jack up long jumpers. Even Captain Johnson has laid off the 22 footer, and looked to get in the painted area to take his shot.
- He has not succumbed to the pressure of playing Teague, ( a guy who simply might not be ready yet ), a lot of minutes off the bench. Because of veteran guards like Bibby,Crawford, and Mo Evans on the roster to compliment JJ, he isn’t forced to throw Teague right into the fire. He knows that he’ll need Teague before the season is over, but he isn’t going to force feed the kid either.
- He has managed the Hawks rotation as well as he ever has in his career. While not only succumbing to not forcing minutes for Teague, he has also coached games more sensibly. While having the ability to go 10 deep, he’s using his depth according to the opponent we play. He’s not feeling obligated to give guys a set number of nightly minutes. Instead, he’s dishing out the minutes ( especially in the 2nd half ), according to how the Hawks match up against the other team.
And when the fan base were calling for the reduction of Mike Bibby’s minutes, he stuck right with Bibby, and his numbers now reflect the shooting he exhibited last season in November, with Bibby shooting in the mid 40% FG and over 40% 3FG.
The most important move, is the use of the 3-guard lineup of Bibby, Crawford, and Johnson. He’s using this lineup as his 2nd half offensive catalyst and possible closing lineup. The 4th quarter dominance of the Hawks can directly be credited to this move. With JJ and Crawford being very good shot creators, and Bibby being a deadly 3 point shooter, it prevents teams from employing alot of double teams against the Hawks. He’s smart enough not to start this group though, because the 3 guards do tend to dominate the ball, which would lessen the touches of Josh Smith and Horford.
All in all, Woody ( at least for 3 weeks ), has been one of the best coaches in the league. Because of that, he gets my early vote for Coach of the Year.
Great job Woody.
You guys can find this on hawks squawk.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
12:11 pm
Give it a rest! You will find this is an excellent post too.
RLP
December 6th, 2009
8:32 pm
KEN STRICKLAND:
So do you continue to belief that the other people who read this blog but whom you are not addressing by these names are too ignorant or stupid to figure out exactly who you are talking about? I guess we should just agree to disagree on this point and go on to another topic.
From my standpoint I think each year is different and must be addressed based on what is going on in that particular year. This year the Hawks have acquired Jeff Teague, Joe Smith and Jamal Crawford who are significant components of this year’s team. As I pointed out earlier this team overall has performed (so far) at a franchise best level considering only their won and lost record. If you want to criticize all of Woody’s failures then you have to also give him some measure of praise for the team’s successes.
The team has won more games on the road than any other team during Woody’s tenure. They have had more significant wins against really good teams on the road than anytime in the near past. And yes they have failed to take care of business against some weaker opponents. I imagine it is very difficult to learn how to fit all of the teams features together easily especially when so many parts of that team are mixed up with new members. I would imagine that it has been especially hard for JJ since he has been the featured prime time player for so long. It is hard to change the role you have had for so long. I imagine it has been especially hard for Jamal Crawford coming to a new team and no longer being a featured offensive threat but instead being relegated to the role of sixth man and having a coach who is asking him to play defense. I imagine it has to be hard for Jeff Teague to come into the pro’s without knowing exactly what his status will be and how he will fit in. I imagine it must be hard for Marvin Williams to see his role diminished as JC gets more playing time at his expense. ZaZa has also seen his role change as he adjusts to Joe Smith getting some of the burn he would normally have received. Bibby’s role requires an adjustment with the arrival of JC also. About the only people who have not been adversely affected by the changing roles are Josh and Al. Both of them seem to have thrived with the arrival of the new personnel. So for all of the faults many perceive Woody having there are things going on with this team that does require a period of adjustment. And yet this team has shown a new level of maturity. Last year’s team did not adjust well to the injury to Josh and the loss in Boston that changed the perception of the team. This year’s team does seem to be doing a better job of handling adversity. Sure there have been a few bad games. The four game stretch that ended with the Knicks game is one example. But even here they won one game during that stretch that last year they would have surely lost. And before we forget the euphoria of the opening stretch how many of you remember that in some of those games the team would open very lackadaisical in the first half only to really tighten down the defensive hatches come the fourth quarter.
I continue to believe that this year’s team may have a chance to be very special. I am not claiming that they are an “Elite” team yet. I will claim that they are on the cusp of becoming an elite team. And you never know when lightening will strike in a bottle. Special years happen occasionally. So for all of you out there who come on this blog and only want to complain and gripe about JJ or Marvin or Woody or poor offensive execution remember that there are at least a few of us who are really more concerned about enjoying a team playing at times with great ball movement and a sense of joy and purpose. One that offers an emerging star in Josh and an undersized center with more heart than almost any player I can remember playing on this team. And if this team sets a franchise record for most wins who will appreciate it more? Those who spend the entire season complaining about the teams faults or those who take delights in its highlights?
honest_abe
December 7th, 2009
12:11 pm
winning is definitely the ultimate goal. win and i’m happy. but that doesn’t mean that i or anyone else can’t criticize some obvious faults.
if anyone thinks this team is going to continute the first 20 game pace, they are crazy. the hawks will win 50 games. if they overacheieved or had a competent coach they could possibly win 60. with woody their ceiling is mediocrity. these are one of those times when i wouldn’t mind being wrong.
the hawks are such fun team to watch when jj makes quick decisions and is a facilitator. they need to start gettin marvin more involved. he’s having some serious confidence issues on the offensive end.
mike vick is about as good as brad gradkowski. almost not quite. heh
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
12:12 pm
I hope you enjoy the season!
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
12:18 pm
“JEJE, I CAN’T SEE THAT THERE IS ANYTHING THAT WOODSON CAN DO TO HELP HORFORD WITH HIS ASSIGNMENT(I GUESS HE COULD SUIT UP-LOL)”.
TRUTH SIRUM-That statement explains your major malfunction, you’re basically a basketball illiterate. Woodson can start helping Horford by abandoning his beloved constantly switching DEF, which is basically an attempt to try and limit Bibby’s obvious DEF liabilities. That would allow Horford, Smoove and Zaza to stay with their man, rather than having to defend PG’s and SG’s out on the perimeter, which isn’t a requirement of any other center’s in the NBA.
How stupid does one have to be to recognize it would be far, far better for Bibby to be out front trying to guard a PG or SG, and you C’s and PF’s under the basket to back him up. I mean, what’s wrong with this picture.
Somehow, in your COY candidates mind, he thinks it’s better to have his C’s and PF’s, Horford, Smoove, Zaza and JSmith, out on the perimeter defending PG’s and SG’s, and his PG’s Bibby and Teague, under the basket as their backups trying to defend agaist PF’s and C’s, rather than the other way aroung. EVEN TO A BASKETBALL ILLITERATE LIKE YOU, THAT SHOULD APPEAR TO BE RATHER STUPID. It’s a shame that it hasn’t registered to your COY candidate.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
12:40 pm
I appreciate your reach out Mr Strickland, as well as how you view and interpret the game. I can accept that you have a view. I don’t have a problem with switching to compensate for the short comings of horford, Bibby or any other player. They all have strengths and they all have weakness. Part of being a team is accepting that and working together as a unit to minimize weakness and maximize strengths.
I’m OK with it. Switch as much as you like.
I support my team and its coach. I’m enjoying the season. I hope that you will find something uplifting to focus on.
Good luck to you and have a nice day.
jerrywest
December 7th, 2009
1:09 pm
Players want Woody’s contract extension:
http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/12/7/1189120/should-woodson-get-extension-hawk
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
1:27 pm
Jerry West did those players check with Ken Strickland before demanding an extension for Woodson? Aren’t they aware that Ken is against Woodson? Sure ken is more knowledgeable than these professional players and know whats best for them. Arent they complaining about switching defense? You mean to tell me they happy with Woodson? I guess the Bubba crew needs to call a meeting!
The team and player view doesn’t matter what Ken says is________, I’ll let you fill in the blank
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
1:28 pm
*they are happy with woodson
Joe Johnson
December 7th, 2009
1:31 pm
“Not at all, man. I’ve been in this situation before. You know, I’ve played through contract situations, so it’s nothing new to me. I just have to stay focused and play my game. But I know that there’s no added pressure on Mike Woodson.
Me and him talk a lot. So…we’re just two guys, man, we’re playing this thing out. And we’re just looking forward to getting wins and making this team a better team as much as possible.”
The voice of the sane
December 7th, 2009
1:36 pm
Even newly acquired veteran Joe Smith had some surprisingly good things to say about Mike Woodson and endorsed a new contract…
I’ve enjoyed playing under Coach Woodson since I’ve been here and he puts us in good situations to go out there and be successful as individuals and as a group. So, if they can get something done, I’m all for it.
Joe went on to reveal a hitherto unrevealed dimension of the Hawks head coach and agreed that that the feeling for re-upping Woodson was pretty much universal in the locker room…
Oh yeah. Yeah. I think so. Everybody likes and enjoys playing for him….He makes the game a lot of fun, even in practice. Pre game, before we take the floor, he kind of relaxes us a little bit.
Can you give an example of that?
Umm. He just jokes around with us a lot. I mean, you know, he kind of notices when we’re tense…and when things are tight in the locker room. So he kind of jokes or says a few jokes or will do something to certain individuals, or say something to certain individuals, where… it could lighten the mood a little bit.
But you can’t share any of those?
Naw….(laughing)
Go figure. Exuding an innate dignity, always respectful, Woody is going all Chris Rock on you, when he wants to. Who knew?
Marvin Williams
December 7th, 2009
1:43 pm
Absolutely. He’s been a great coach for us young guys. I mean …if he’s not here….who knows what position we’d be in.
Will everyone say that?
Absolutely. I think you’re gonna get that answer from anybody around the room. We have a lot of faith in coach Woodson. You know, he really brought us along the way. We were 19 year old kids. We’re 24-25 now. We’re definitely playing some pretty good basketball. So, he’s a big credit to that.
Bubba Crew Chief
December 7th, 2009
1:45 pm
CODE BLUE, CODE BLUE, ITS COMING UNGLUED, CODE BLUE, CODE BLUE
JOSH SMITH
December 7th, 2009
1:46 pm
Yeah….I mean, he’s proven himself. And…he’s a good coach. He’s a good coach. He’s a players’ coach. You know, he works hard just like we work hard. And anybody who’s bettered their record every year that he’s been a coach deserves a contract.
Daniel
December 7th, 2009
1:51 pm
Ken- Obviously, you can’t take a 20 game stretch and turn it into the season record. Otherwise, we wouldn’t need to play the rest of the season right? I am more than aware of the obvious, but thank you for pointing that out. I tend to look at the season in 20 game blocks, because that gives a more accurate portrayal of the team’s ability than going on a game to game basis. It is arbitrary number, but works as it breasks the season down into quarters. I understand you think that Woodson is running the team into the ground. I got that. We will see over the next 20 then, I think the team will continue to play at roughly the same level, winning about 15 of those games. You think the team is bound for despair and destruction. We will see.
JeJe- Awww, did your feelings get hurt? I am so sorry. The profanity in your posts really makes you look like an intelligent basketball fan.
“who gives a **** if they are the worst basketball team at a historic level?”- well, everyone in New Jersey for one, Lawerence Frank and Jay Z probably care, David Stern definitely has taken notice, every single player on the Nets (including Lopez the magnificent). You do realize that points and rebounds in losing efforts from sorry teams are typically overinflated due to game situations? You have every right to your opinion and if you share it, I have every right to comment on it. and vice versa, but I did not level insults at you and I did not curse. So if you cannot conduct yourself in a more mature manner then I will ask you not to address me in the future.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 7th, 2009
1:55 pm
This is flat-out hilarious… can’t wait to see the full feature.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
1:55 pm
TS: IF you go with a 3 guard line-up as you suggest then Josh and Al must be in yhe lineup. You keep calling for a center yet I don’t think you even know why. Al horford is not only one of the better Hawks but one of the better players in the league. His leadership far exceeds Joe or anyone else on the team with the possible exception of JS. His intangibles are off the charts. I would even go so far as to say that he is the ‘one’ Hawk that is untouchable. Even above Josh. [please no, I am not anti Josh] I truly believe he is the foundation of our franchise. His maturity sets him apart from Josh. These two young forwards are who Mr. Sund is going to continue to build around. Joe was a wonderful transition piece and I hope he stays…but these two young kids are for real and long term.
niremetal,Sautee,K.S.: (Nothing but respect, I hope that’s apparent)
Pau Gasol is considered a [4] I guess. But would you not welcome him?
Same with KG and Duncan. But they are all 7 ftr’s. They also have another big alongside. As for TD and KG they are centers [defense] pretending to be [4's] for their legacy (no disrespect). In these cases they each have a sidekick. Josh is a sidekick, just undersized. Therefore both Josh and Al are undersized. With one move we could be monsters at two pos.!
If we are going with a smaller lineup, yet not utilizing the speed which occurs in said matchup [KS] then we are playing checkers v. chess. Also by playing Marv [Once again, not anti Marv] alonside Al and Josh throttles our speed advantage. When playing Al and Josh together Joe should be at the [3].
This brings me to J.Teague – If we are going to try and win with speed and athleticism? Well, enough said, I reckon.
In all that I did not mention the peoples choice for cOY. I hoped that even they could figure out my point.
Daniel
December 7th, 2009
1:57 pm
honest abe- I am one of those people, and I am not stupid. For the record, I actually predicted 52 wins at the begining of the season. I think that is far better than mediocre. You don’t have to agree with me on how the Hawks season is going, but since we are both making predicitions it is really unreasonable for you to suggest that it is “stupid”. Especially when you think we win 50 games, the differenc is 6-7 wins, c’mon man that is not that huge of a difference when looking at the next 62 games.
Daniel
December 7th, 2009
2:00 pm
Najeh- thanks for the link, that was hilarious.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
2:30 pm
Najeh Davenpoop, I thought that was a smoove rap, they ought to play that @ the nest.Thanks for the link.
Speaking of links. Great Link Jerry West. Now We Know!!!
To win 50 games, with out a legit center and a slow point guard is definitely an accomplishment. To win 57 would shatter all time Hawks records, so yeah, we are playing at a high level. You wont win them all. But if you maintain a certain level that’s whats important. Hawks are playing at a high level. The NBA knows it! RECOGNIZE.
Its nice to read so many positive hawks blog, and links. I dont subscribe to the “doom’s day prophecy” Ken. I am very happy with the team and its direction and its about time for Sund co-sign.
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
2:32 pm
“Medium Sized Ray – I refuse to use the adjective Big for anyone who congratulates that degenerate M. Vick for anything. Mayhaps you can stay on topic. This is a Hawks blog.”
Right. Sorry to drag you off topic with your posts about the Hawks. Wait….that was the only post you made…. DING ….
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
2:35 pm
I see canniblogging is at it’s best, and we’re not even at mid-season yet. Hooray…..
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
2:40 pm
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
1:55 pm
TS:?
If you are referring to me, Ive never asked for a 3 guard line up. Why you choose to credit me with that is not clear. If Woodson feels at any time its best to use a 3G(pun intended) lineup during the course of a game then its probably in our best interest. Having quality tools available gives more options at the coach’s disposal.
Your understanding or interpretation of my view on Horford is pointed, misguided and wrong.
Actually, your entire supposition is ill logical. Id rather not address it, or you because Ray was right.
My BIG RAY RULE, is still in effect when it comes to you.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
2:43 pm
What else are they gonna say?
Joe’s thinking: I’m leaving anyway? What do I care? Even if I stay he let’s me shoot as much as I want. I still get to be an all-star.
Why would Marv say anything but that – He’s had 1 real coach, 1 yr. in college. Really he knows nothing else. I’m willing to concede mr.w. is most likely better than marv’s AAU coaches.
Not exactly a ringing endorsement from Josh.
Players coach, give me a break.
Joe: “We are just two guys hanging out”: Lombardi, belichik, Bryant, Wooden, Thompson, Knight, Saban, Aurbach, Jackson, Old fella from Temple [name escapes] can you see that statement ever being made about them?
Joe Smith: PT…maybe. He’s here 1 yr. why create controversey?
I will concede that they may genuinely like the guy. I don’t know him.
I do not like his erratic, and jaded persona which manifests itself within or players performance.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
2:43 pm
*I don’t subscribe to the “doom’s day prophecy” Ken. I am very happy with the team and its direction and its about time for Sund to co-sign.
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
2:43 pm
SAUTEE-I followed your suggestion and went over to the Falcons blog, and MAN. It reminded me of why I stopped making a regular appearance over there. There’s no reason to expect their attitudes to change because their attitudes are based on yrs, decades, even lifetimes of conditioning. MVick really isn’t their issue, just their justification.
The only equality that seems to appear on those types of blogs is centered around the level of ignorance and stupidity there is on both sides of the issue. Even PETA is virtually silent when animal abuse is reported unless it involves a celebrity like MVick. Their main interest is in getting publicity to spur donations.
Some of these same idiots that are using Vicks dogfighting exploits as their excuse for expressing their preconceived racist feelings, probably supported Sarah Palin, who liked to fly around with her friends at state expense in an airplane and indiscriminantly shoot moose and whatever else they fancied.
Then we have those equally moronic nuts who think if we bring back MVick he’ll do for this team what he didn’t do when he was here. These idiots insist on blaming everyone but Vick for getting involved with illegal dogfighting, getting caught, lying about it and getting convicted for it. I wish him luck, but not with the Falcons.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
2:45 pm
Didnt mean to wake you Ray…LOL
Good post
December 7th, 2009
2:48 pm
http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/12/7/1189120/should-woodson-get-extension-hawk
Joe Smith
December 7th, 2009
2:51 pm
But Joe Smith’s been around long enough to see the harsh business side of this league to know nothing is certain and business decisions are different that basketball decisions sometimes….
When I look at it, this thing is….more of a business than anything. And it kind of takes the sport out of it a little bit….because you’re thinking so much with a business mind. Hopefully they’ll get something done. Because, like you said, there’s not too many coaches that have taken a team from when they first got here, 13-14 wins, to now, last year 47 wins. Now try to take it up another level.
Mike Bibby
December 7th, 2009
2:52 pm
Mike Bibby returned to this team with a big pay cut. A favorite player to boo in Boston, it is clear Bibby is a key player on the Hawks roster, bringing mental toughness, and is a team leader. It is also clear Mike Woodson is a big reason Bibby returned and explains why…
I love him and I’ve had a lot of coaches in my time. For some coaches I say I like, and got along with, and some coaches I didn’t. You know, I mean I love Coach Woodson. He’s relaxed. He has fun. I think that’s what you got to do.
I love coming to work here and…I can talk to him. I can give him my input on the team and stuff like that and not a lot of coaches let you do that.
I don’t think, right now, I could be in a better situation and actually that’s another reason why I came here, came back here.
Just how… being comfortable with the coaching staff and my teammates.
How do you rate him with all the other coaches you played for?
Definitely one of the top. I’ve had a couple…I’ve had Lionel Hollins, umm….Rick Adelman and Coach Woodson’s right up there with those two, too.
Adelman? That’s rich company.
I mean… you get a lot of different type of attitudes and personalities with coaches. You know, some coaches are “this is my way” and ‘this is how we’re going to do it’ and you have coaches like Woodson, I mean just…I tell the guys….we got it good (here).
A lot of coaches that you (the Hawks players) probably wouldn’t like playing for. I mean, we have got a good situation with coach Woodson. He definitely deserves an extension.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
2:55 pm
K.S. I applaud your comments.
I decided it was a no win to even comment on #7.
Sarah Palin – what a floozy. I actually know guys who voted for her [not JM] because they thought she was attractive (more or less).
We had best be careful lest we lose our ‘Rush Limbough’ ditto-card.
Yes
December 7th, 2009
3:02 pm
No danger there
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
3:24 pm
TS: Please understand I’m not attempting to engage in any sort of repartee` with you sirs and or ma’ams.
However, @ 12:08 PM paragraph 12: you stated, mrw.s most important move was going with the 3 guard lineup…2nd half…Bibby, Jamal, Joe…
possible closing line-up [paraphrase].
That was my reference point.
My apologies if your remarks were misconstrued on my part.
rms
December 7th, 2009
3:44 pm
jerrywest:
Thats weird, why is the Celticsblog talking about whether or not the Hawks should get a new head coach? Why do they care?
Idiot Checker
December 7th, 2009
3:57 pm
Im sure you are very much aware that the 12:08 PM post is a copy and past of a post someone posted on The atlanta hawks blog page. It is not my view just a view that I felt would bring some positive thinking rather than then dark doom day prophecy you and Ken subscribe to Granddad.
Is there a house or something you can haunt?
As I said at the bottom of the post you can find this Post on “Hawks Squawk”.
Get your facts straight. Please talk with some one who is interested in what you have to say. Im not.
Have a nice day.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
3:59 pm
# Joe Johnson
$14,976,754
# Josh Smith
$10,800,000
# Jamal Crawford
$9,360,000
# Marvin Williams
$7,500,000
# Mike Bibby
$6,217,617
# Zaza Pachulia
$4,750,000
# Al Horford
$4,307,640
# Maurice Evans
$2,500,000
# Jeff Teague
$1,373,880
# Mario West
$1,000,497
# Randolph Morris
$855,189
# Joe Smith
$825,497
# Jason Collins
$825,497
Wabe
December 7th, 2009
4:07 pm
8-2 against teams at .500 or better.
6-4 against teams under .500.
Gotta take care of business on a night to night basis. Can’t just plan on showing up against the quality opponents. Gotta take every team seriously, because any team can beat you on any given night.
Hummm
December 7th, 2009
4:18 pm
Either way you go they are winning and over .500 good point
my perspective
December 7th, 2009
4:21 pm
wantabee there’s only 2 games difference in your stat and not enough history to make any definitive state men. Looks to me like they are winning. Isnt it true that even the best teams have losing streaks and slump? So the total of what you say is the Hawks are 8 games over five hundred.
Mike is Back
December 7th, 2009
4:26 pm
KenStrick, just a follow-up on our conversation about the organic growth by the Hawks in the off-season. In that post you at leased acknowledge that the organic growth by the Hawks has help to compensate for the moves made by the Big Three in the East…save for Orlando. lol
WELL…how can you make that statement about the organic growth by the hAWKS…without giving the coach and his staff credit for nurturing and cultivating that organic growth? Surly, the Hawks are far better off than they were before this whole odyssey began.
I was reminded by one of my cohorts at work…just how little talent Woody had to work with doing those lean years. You were here…Surely, you remember those dark days of mediocrity…Clyde should too. lol
I think we take for granted at times the difficulties of turning a bunch of raw talent into a contender. These Hawks are a fun and entertaining team to watch…the way they get after it on defense…yet they are still extremely raw. The thing that is the most impressive…is the road wins. Last season DALLAS would have run us out the gym after a back to back…especially after a lethargic game like we played against the Knicks. Again, I haven’t been able to see many games…too many obligation right now…but I feel like I hit the jack pot with the season tic.
No one is saying the Hawks will play this way all season…that would be insane…but when you look around the league…the Hawks are right there…Woody’s detractors should not easily overlook that feat.
HECK, even Mark Bradley said he would pay to see the Hawks play…and trust me…in Bradley hey day…his negative criticism of Woody easily far exceeded yours. lol
After that debacle in the Dome Sunday…my Hawks Tic are looking better and better…
Stick with a winner…and heed THE SERUM brooooooooooooo. Heh heh
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU…GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mike Bibby
December 7th, 2009
4:27 pm
(Back To Mike Bibby)… So then you’re kind of good for Woodson in the locker room. Kind of an extension….
Yeah, like I mean…when I’m out there and I see something on the court, I’ll give my input, and he lets me go with it. He lets me go out in there in the game…for him to have that much confidence in me…for him to let me do that, that gives people confidence to play.
High praise, indeed. In truth, after friction with Ron Artest with a going-nowhere Sacramento team, Bibby’s career has been resurrected in Atlanta.
Welcome to the ultra competitive NBA, an Atlanta team known for it’s frugality, an ownership group that has its own issues, a weak residual economy, an yet-to-determined new Collective Bargaining Agreement in the early stages of negotiations and it helps explain the situation. Are those the reasons why Woodson is coaching this crucial season without a net?
Or is it really as simple as something like… the team’s brain trust is unsure that Mike Woodson is the guy that can take this team to the next level?
They have only had five years of work to make that determination.
Six year Hornets’ coach, Byron Scott, was fired for a 3-6 record following a poor playoff showing the year before.
Seven year Nets’ coach, Lawrence Frank, was fired for working the Nets plan and far harder than his players did.
Mike Woodson’s done everything that has been asked of him for 5 straight years, yet had to survive one reported attempted firing from a GM (Billy Knight) who quit afterwards, and is being scrutinized by that GM’s replacement, Mr. Rick Sund.
To be fair, Sund believed enough to give Woodson a ‘show me more’ two year extension that ends at the end of this season.
It sounds like Woodson is a survivor. But he’s really been far more that. He’s been downright successful – anyway you want you to measure it. So the delay and non-negotiations until this year is finished are, on the surface, simply puzzling.
Nicky
December 7th, 2009
4:36 pm
My bad, didn’t realize it inappropriate to respond to a post by another member. Animal torture is just not my thing.
Hope Teague gets some extended minutes Wed. Will be interesting to see him head to head vs Harris. Surely Bibby will not be trying to cover Devin.
Thanks to all for some great reading on this paper’s Hawks blogs. Many insightful comments and tons of 3 Stooges style comedy from the regulars. Some egos are off the chart. Everything from informative links to serious concern over the impact a particulare player will make on an upcoming game when they won’t even play due to placement on the IR. Priceless!!!
Nicky
December 7th, 2009
4:39 pm
Sorry, Wed in my last post should read Sunday.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
4:42 pm
TS: Why the bitterness? We actually, almost, are in agreement on a thing or two here and there. I actually agreed with some of your premis in the 12:08 PM post. There can be dissenting opinions between grownups w/o all the muckraking.
Brad
December 7th, 2009
4:44 pm
This interview with Donaghy is pretty disturbing. I sure hope Josh is aware:
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4722584
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
4:45 pm
GRANDAD-I actually find her to be a reasonably attractive women, but when it comes to politics, I find intelligence a far more attractive trait. And when it comes to intelligence, she’s a BEAR-RILLA. Aren’t we still waiting for her to name a single book or magazine shes ever read?
Have you noticed whenever I address TRUTH SERUM with a really strong point about him or his beloved COY, there suddenly appears a series of posts under different silly monikers in retaliation? He’s so limited in his ability to offer an intelligent defense and/or response to any logical challenge to his stance. He’s too insecure to offer any of these stupid responses in his name, so he uses other identities to launch his tirades, which are often heavily laced with vulgarity, a sure sign of a limited vocabulary and underdeveloped mentality. WHY DOESN’T HE/THEY JUST SAVE HIMSELF/THEMSELVES AND EVERYONE ELSE TIME AND EFFORT AND JUST POST UNDER THE NAME THAT BEST SUITS HIM, SYBIL. Afterall, a rose(psycho) by any other name is still a rose(psycho).
Did you see that caption about Teague showing improvement? Isn’t that virtually the same comment that was issued sometime last yr about OHunter? And, isn’t he still trying to remove parts of last yrs bench from his butt?
perpetual idiot
December 7th, 2009
4:49 pm
Id did not write it idiot. If said that and you ignore that and continue as if id did, I just repeated it and you still go forward. Say what you like I see that you have foolish behavior. Therefore I see you as a fool.
And Invoke the BIG RAY RULE WHICH IS CLEAR THAT IF YOU SEE THAT THE PERSON YOU ARE SPEAKING WITH IS OBNOXIOUS, HAS A PREDETREMINED COURSE AND THE CONVERSATION HAS NO MERIT, IGNORE THAT PERSON AND MOVE ON. I HAVE NOTHER FURTHER TO SAY TO YOU, YOUR BUBBA CREW WHETHER ITS YOUR LEADER OR YOUR FEMALE AUXILLARY BRANCH.
GO HAWKS.
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
4:51 pm
BUT IF I JUST HAD A PENIS LIKE JOE MAMA, I WOULDNOT BE THE B!ITCH I AM NOW!
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
4:55 pm
I see your point Ken, no arguement here.
Joe Mama
December 7th, 2009
4:57 pm
Thanks Ken! I hope you are able to remove that b!tch in you. Good luck.
ILL-logical
December 7th, 2009
5:01 pm
“Old fella from Temple [name escapes] ”
That would be John Chaney.He was one of the all time greats- he spent years and years at cheney State-an HBCU near Philly- before getting an opportunity to coach D-1 ball. With limited facilities and resources he not only won games but he made men.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
5:15 pm
Ken Strickland – W/O getting into politics, I must agree. My point on my friends was that [her looks] was their prime reason for voting for ‘her’, as I’m sure you understood. What’s that ol’ song………..
“A little on the Trashy Side”.
Ahh Sybil – You know on occasion, I see promise. Then….~!@#$%^&*….
J.Teague – It’s a crying shame. mr.w.’s comments are nothing more than a smokescreen. He has no intention of playing the young man. It’s so obvious that he is managing this team for a contract rather than most astute leaders who would be coaching to perpetuate their program and the franchise.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
5:21 pm
Thanks > ILL_logical, I could not think of his name for the life of me. I agree with your remarks 100%.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
5:32 pm
TS: If you did not agree with the post then why re-post it, sir.
[12:08 PM]
theZaZaguy
December 7th, 2009
5:41 pm
Hey “Mike is back” I feel the same way about my season tickets. I took a gamble upgrading to floor seats (I can’t afford to keep all of them so I list a bunch on stubhub), but the ROI has been great so far. I get to see the games I really want and the wife is happy about it.
I’ve become really emotionally attached to this team, much like with Nique, Doc, and Randy Wittman. I laugh, I cry, I jump up and make inappropriate remarks to the referees and opposing players. These guys are for real. And I’m looking forward to a 55 win season.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
5:46 pm
Good points
Mike is Back
December 7th, 2009
4:26 pm
KenStrick, just a follow-up on our conversation about the organic growth by the Hawks in the off-season. In that post you at leased acknowledge that the organic growth by the Hawks has help to compensate for the moves made by the Big Three in the East…save for Orlando. lol
WELL…how can you make that statement about the organic growth by the hAWKS…without giving the coach and his staff credit for nurturing and cultivating that organic growth? Surly, the Hawks are far better off than they were before this whole odyssey began.
I was reminded by one of my cohorts at work…just how little talent Woody had to work with doing those lean years. You were here…Surely, you remember those dark days of mediocrity…Clyde should too. lol
I think we take for granted at times the difficulties of turning a bunch of raw talent into a contender. These Hawks are a fun and entertaining team to watch…the way they get after it on defense…yet they are still extremely raw. The thing that is the most impressive…is the road wins. Last season DALLAS would have run us out the gym after a back to back…especially after a lethargic game like we played against the Knicks. Again, I haven’t been able to see many games…too many obligation right now…but I feel like I hit the jack pot with the season tic.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
5:50 pm
theZaZaguy
I think Zaza has stepped his game up. He finishes in the post, Hes aggressive, physical, hes hitting 12-14 footers man he’s rolling. Much better player than last year
theZaZaguy
December 7th, 2009
5:55 pm
ZaZa has also cut down on travelling. I remember he used to get 2-3 called every game, which means he did it every time he got the ball. I used to think I was special for yelling “ZaZa!” in a very gutteral voice, but others are doing it as well now so I don’t feel as special. But I’m the only one in my section, so that makes me feel a little better.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
5:56 pm
theZaZaguy that Randy Wittman John battle team was fun to watch. Like you Im excited about this team. I think the chemistry has to be one of the best in the NBA. Close…we are not far from where we need to be. Hummm. I remember The Lambeer, Thomas, rodman teams that gave us fit. That team had ups and downs during the season but come play offs they were on point and keep us from the higher rounds.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
6:01 pm
theZaZaguy Yea, I remember that, I gave him the nick name “turnover waiting to happen.” Now I have confidence in his game. I think Id like to see Randolf Morris get a little more burn. Horford,Zaza and Morris should be maybe 20,20,8 minutes in the post. Morris has stepped his game up too.
theZaZaguy
December 7th, 2009
6:02 pm
I think we’re more like the Pistons team that won two in a row back in 89-90. They didn’t have a real center either. They were young, physical, played tough D, and were 9 deep. Remember when they took two in the Boston Garden when the Celtics were supposedly invincible? I see these hawks doing similar things.
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
6:22 pm
MIKE IS BACK-Go back and read my Dec 06, 9:32pm post and you’ll see where I’ve acknowledged giving Woodson credit for holding this team together under some very trying times for himself, the players and ownership. But I’m not willing to give him major credit for developing the players he’s been given when there are only 3 remaining draft picks on his roster after 4yrs in the lottery.
Are you willing to give him credit for developing JJ, Bibby, Crawford, Flip, MEvans, Joe Smith, JCollins, RMorris OHunter or Zaza? Can you honestly say his approach to developing PG JTeague is any different than the failed tactics he’s used to develop the other departed draft picks? Anyone can coach a team when there’s no expectation of winning, but now that there’s an expectation of winning, he’s rapidly showing he’s not up to the task.
Former GM Billy Knight and current GM RSund deserve the majority of the credit for the development of this team. When it was determined we needed an inside scorer, Smoove spent his time and money to live and work in Houston with Hakeem to develop his inside gm. What did Woodson do to accomodate those efforts? Did he modify his OFF to include going inside to Smoove? As we all know, but some refuse to admit, Smoove got so frustrated that he started floating outside to the 3pt line, which was were the ball usually was, and started hoisting jumpers to get involved in the OFF. WHAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT ON WOODSON’S PART WAS THAT?
For the last 2yrs, there has been a constant series of complaints, some legimate, about the lack of development and/or inconsistency in Marvin, Smoove, and even Horford. My biggest complaint with Woodson, other than his inconsistency, is although he now has a quick, fast, athletic, experienced, talented, versatile and deep team, he’s still trying to coach it as if none of these things exist.
He complained and said he didn’t use his bench because it had no talent or experience. Well, this yrs bench has an abundance of both, and he’s still doing the same stupid crap. When he SStaudemire and ALaw, he complained and wouldn’t play them because he said he needed a player with actual PG skills. Well, he made the decision to draft PG JTeague and he’s still doing the same stupid crap with Teague.
Hell, everything on this team has developed but Woodson. There isn’t a NBA HC or assistant that couldn’t have gotten out of this team what Woodson has gotten, most could have gotten a lot more. His biggest contribution to this team has been the perserverance and direction he provided through those turbulent times, but on the court, he’s done very little by comparison.
His inconsistency, and obcession with having the team play WOODY BALL, is actually having an adverse effect. We’ve gone from leading the NBA in pts in the paint, fastbreak pts, shooting percentage, ranking near top in scoring(108PPG), rebounds(especially OFF), assists and wins over the 1st 13gms to having difficulty doing all of the above. The is the same thing that happened last yr.
I’m giving him credit for the underdevelopment of this team, especially over the last 2yrs.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
6:29 pm
I have to disagree with you. Not only did they have a real center, they had an all star center
William “Bill” Laimbeer, Jr. (born May 19, 1957) is a retired National Basketball Association player for the Detroit Pistons. Playing at center, the 6′11″ Laimbeer was a four-time All-Star and integral part of the Pistons teams that won two championships. Initially raised in the Chicago, Illinois suburb of Clarendon Hills, Laimbeer attended Palos Verdes High School in Southern California and then the University of Notre Dame. Laimbeer was also the head coach of the Detroit Shock in the WNBA from 2002 to 2009, coaching the team to three league championships.
Position(s) Center
Jersey #(s) 40, 41
Listed height 6 ft 11 in (2.11 m)
Listed weight 260 lb (120 kg)
Career stats
Points 13,790
Rebounds 10,400
Blocks 965
Stats @ Basketball-Reference.com
Career highlights and awards
* 2x NBA Champion (1989, 1990)
* 4x NBA All-Star (1983-85, 1987)
* 2x led NBA in total Rebounds (1985, 1986)
* Detroit Pistons #40 retired
And Rick Mahorn-Statistics: Latest Game | Season | Splits | Career
Rick Mahorn Detroit Pistons | Forward-Center | #44
Height: 6′10″
Weight: 260 lbs.
Born: Sep 21, 1958 in Hartford, CT
College: Hampton Institute
No, they were well represented in the paint.
I think you might like this link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-LTyDiCu0A
STAN CASTING
December 7th, 2009
6:32 pm
Enter your comments here
Rocket Science.
December 7th, 2009
6:33 pm
MIKE IS BACK, Pretty much in the highly competitive NBA, Its really a joke. You can take a coach from park and recreation league, give him ten very young players, put them on the court and they will be a fourth seed in 4 years. Its really organic. I dont Know why coaches are paid so much and why its so competitive…its so easy every a cave man can do it….
Rocket Science.
December 7th, 2009
6:34 pm
Even a cave man can do it.
STAN CASTING
December 7th, 2009
6:34 pm
MAN I WISH I WOULD HAVE STAYED IN ATL D.C SUCKS.
STAN CASTING
December 7th, 2009
6:36 pm
IM CALL TED TURNER AND SEE IF WE CAN BUY THE HAWKS BACK.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
6:37 pm
theZaZaguy I do see this similarity. That boston team was in decline as is this one. But again, Detroit had a low post power. We dont, although I think a 3 headed monster of horford, Zaza and Morris is decent and much better than Horford alone
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
6:43 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nuzx7-PjwEo&feature=fvw
this is the type of assertiveness a real center will bring us.
O'Brien
December 7th, 2009
6:50 pm
As far as players speaking up in defense of Woodson and his contract extension, what are they supposed to say? The Hawks have been to the playoffs 2 years in a row, and are 14-6, on pace for 56 or so wins.
Why would Al tell a reporter “I wish Woody would tell the guards to give me the ball more”. Why would Teague tell a reporter “I wish Woody would play me more”.
Its the way of the business. Just because players support a coach does not mean the coach is doing/not doing great job.
As far as the Hawks having those wins, their inconsistencies will be a problem in the playoffs.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
6:53 pm
Those Det. teams did Isaiah have to sit and watch, gather experience through osmosis, take a turn around the league, not get thrown to the wolves too quickly by Coach Daly. Was it his 2nd or 3rd yr. before he got traded to San Francisco or were they already GS by then. Oh! Never mind, they had a real coach, who was interested in developing talent and setting his team on a path for a championship. Kudos to HOF Coach Daly! Also to Isiah [the plyr] top 50 all-time, HOF, playing career.
Off topic but kudos to D.Rodman an all-time great who rarely if ever gets the credit he deserves. Even though he was a nut-case, no one
played harder, rebounded better for his size, nor was a better team player (virtually unnoticed by most), or defender. Except for his attn.getting devices (strangeness) he was all that any coach could/would ever want in a player!!!
Idiot Watch
December 7th, 2009
7:01 pm
Isiah Thomas
Drafted: 1981, First Round, 2nd overall by the Detroit Pistons (best guard in draft)
Jeff Teague( the 7th best guard in draft)
6:53 pm
Those Det. teams did Isaiah have to sit and watch, gather experience through osmosis, take a turn around the league, not get thrown to the wolves too quickly by Coach Daly. Was it his 2nd or 3rd yr. before he got traded to San Francisco or were they already GS by then. Oh! Never mind
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
7:05 pm
Rick Mahorn > hmmmm > errily similar to young Mr. Horford.
MaHorn: 6-10, 260, pos. C.
MaHorford: 6-10, 240, pos. C.
RM goes on the Adkin’s diet and we’ve got the same player.
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
7:16 pm
I don’t recall mentioning Jeff Teague. I’m glad you brought that to my attn. Some people might have drawn a parallel to Acie. Well, I’ll be dawgone. Good catch on your part though. Since you noticed some similarities, I sure hope Jeff never tries coaching or being a general manager or owning a league. Having said that in jest, what Magic did to Isaiah was beneath him. Isaiah didn’t deserve that.
Idiot Watch
December 7th, 2009
7:18 pm
Rick Mahorn was the power forward, Laimbeer was the center.
If Al took Steroids he could be a power forward like Mahorn.
rusty
December 7th, 2009
7:22 pm
the key to the hawks playing better will be an uptempo offense & more ball movement. this means that jj cant monopolize the ball eating up the shot cloak,he is more efficent if he doesnt force his shots. he certainly dont need th take over 20 shots a game. our switching defense is painfully stupid. last game i seen horford 20 feet away from the basket playing
dallas guards. we need to have horford & josh under the basket ,not out on the perimeter
& our guards against forwards. why the hell do we play this stupid defense. the only way
we will continue to improve will be not to play at a slow tempo
theZaZaGuy
December 7th, 2009
7:26 pm
Let me clarify, I meant that Bill Laimbeer wasn’t a real low post center like Shaq or Hakeem. His offense consisted of floating to the top of the key and drilling the jumper (which Jon Kontract try to emulate). He and Mahorn defended and rebounded well, just like our two headed rebounding monster.
They didn’t have a Shaq or Hakeem that could get points down low at the end of a close playoff game. They did it by forcing turnovers, rebounding well, and finding the hot hand whether it was Isaiah, Dumars, or Vinnie (the microwave).
That is how the hawks will go deep in the playoffs. Their atheleticism and team chemistry is very similar to that Pistons team.
The Hawks and the Celtics schooled the pistons through most of the 80s until they peaked. And they didn’t peak until most of the guys were in their late twenties. Our core is in their mid twenties. I see great things ahead even without a dominant 5.
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
7:32 pm
Nicky ,
I was and no longer am a Mike Vick fan. I congratulated him for what he did on the football field, NOT what he did off of it. If you knew me and anything I’ve posted HERE, or the Falcons blogs besides that one post, you would know that my views are similar to yours. And I didn’t say you couldn’t respond to my posts. I just made fun of the fact that while you accused me of getting off topic, I have yet to see you get ON topic. Take your sanctimonious babble to someone else.
For the record, that post was a bit sarcastic, as Vick has seen next to no action all year, yet not only does he get to play more than a couple snaps against the Falcons, but he actually scores. I understand if the total amount of irony in the situation escapes you….
theZaZaGuy
December 7th, 2009
7:34 pm
And people knock Josh and Al for being small. They’re both 6′9″, but they play bigger for some reason.
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
7:35 pm
Having said that, I am no longer a Vick fan because he is no longer a member of my Atlanta Falcons, and because he left us in a bad situation. But, I do not hate the man, and I do forgive him.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
7:43 pm
I am a Vick fan. Yes, he did badly and made poor decision. I dont throw out the baby with the bath water, neither am I unforgiving or unable to see the racism behind his conviction. 2 Months before he was arrested the crime he committed was a misdemeanor. Im very proud of him that he has chosen to renounce his ways and be the best person he can be from this time forward. Im a fan of the underdog(pun intended), and Vick is an underdog.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
7:45 pm
Furthermore we could be in a better situation if we had chosen the path of supporting a young man who had made some very poor decisions.
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
7:45 pm
Truth Serum,
Having fun today, I see.
Don’t worry about waking me up. The wife managed to do that this morning while I was sleeping really good, and enjoying the day off. Happens every time, I swear….
Grandad ,
I understand yours and Truth Serum’s issues with our lack of size. There is an alternative to this issue, but I’m not sure it’s anymore feasible at this point than simply adding a bigger guy to the roster, and moving Al to the PF position.
I hate to go back to the “Detroit Model”, as I feel that our team doesn’t fit it. However, there is a reason why it was liked. And it’s what Woody was doing with that awful switching defense. The switching defense isn’t a problem if you 1) Have an entire team that buys into it, and 2) Have the kind of personnel that are capable of executing it.
Detroit had great team defense, the kind that only needed the two Wallaces to cover up mistakes on occasion. They also had length, strength, and/or toughness at each position. What each player may give up in size, they made up in length. What they make give up in height or weight, they made up in near perfect, consistent execution and toughness. Billups could guard 1s and 2s. Rip Hamilton could guard mostly 2s, but also some smaller 3s. Prince had the length and quickness to bother anybody but 5s and the bigger 4s. ‘Sheed and Big Ben had the length and strength to handle 4s and 5s, and got help from Prince when they needed.
Thing is, they all bought into it, and nobody was caught totally or consistently in a mismatch nightmare. It was very hard to exploit their defense.
Not so with Atlanta. Bibby has enough trouble guarding his own position, much less a bigger player (most 2s or 3s). JJ can guard some 1s, most 2s, and some 3s, but he doesn’t do it all game, as the team needs him more on offense (though lately the contrary is certainly arguable). Either way, he doesn’t do it all the time.
Marvin can guard 3s, some 2s, and some 4s. Not always committed, however.
Josh is the greatest help defender in the game. He can guard 3s and 4s, but has to avoid direct confrontation with many 5s.
Al can guard most 5s, and some 4s.
But the problem begins at guard. Which is why our undersized frontcourt is continually exposed….
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
7:48 pm
theZaZaGuy Bill was the consummate Bad boy.True he had an outside shot like Rasheed Wallace but on defense he was surely under the basket causing havoc. He was a very physical center and got kick out of a lot of games. He was the poster for “Bad Boys”
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
8:03 pm
Truth Serum ,
I don’t dislike him, and as I said, I forgive him. I’m glad he’s casting off his past and trying to do the best for himself and his family in the future. I hope he’s cast off those friends and relatives as well. Bottom line, those a$$holes are the ones who dragged him down. He let them use his money to have some illegal fun, and then they turned on him when the interrogations started. You can call it a racist situation if you want, and you may be right. What I see is a man’s own friends dragging him down to save their own asses. What I see is a justice system that found a high profile target.
Vick wasn’t prosecuted because he was black. It was because he was rich and famous. Had he lived next door to me or you, it would have barely made the local papers.
And screw PETA. Somebody needs to send their asses to some version of Jurassic Park so they can hug those dinosaurs, along with the trees.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
8:03 pm
Big Ray I almost agree with you. We agree that the Switch is an acceptable defensive scheme to counter skill and physical inequalities. We agree that Bibby is one of those inequalities on defense, he’s an asset on offense, suggesting a trade off.
I think we actually come out on top in the exchange on most nights. I think next year will be Bibby’s last as a starter in Atlanta. bibby is deft on the three at the most crucial times. You cant teach or ignore that.
I disagree with you on Horford. I think he can guard most PF who are by default playing center but I think that most true centers expose him for the power forward he is.
Its easier (in my opinion), to rotate and cover for a guard than it is to compensate for the inequities of the post. One requires speed whereas the other requires strength and agility and size.
Both are natural positions.
Having that in mind, Bibby is a natural point guard and horford is not a physical or natural center.
Either way the Hawks are OK with the “switch” and the players are winning with it. Ill have an issue when we drop down to .500 or the player complain, or we stop winning.
None of that is happening so its an non issue for me. Id rather focus on how to move into the higher echelon of the NBA.
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
8:06 pm
Furthermore we could be in a better situation if we had chosen the path of supporting a young man who had made some very poor decisions.
I get where you’re going with this, but we’d still have been out of a starting quarterback for two years. That, and nobody was sure what the League Commissioner was going to do. Who were we going to play in the meantime, Redman? You see how THAT’S going.
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
8:14 pm
Truth Serum ,
I hear you, but that’s just it. How DO we move into the higher echelon? I know you think it’s mostly about getting a “real” center, but just how do you do that? We can’t just go to the grocery store and grab a 7-footer with starting caliber skills. Sund has to engineer a trade, but who then does he trade? As good as Horford is, nobody is going to trade a bigger, stronger center for him. Not unless they absolutely cannot afford to keep such a center, and they are unable to trade away other players.
We won’t get a shot at drafting one, because as well as we’re playing, we won’t get a high draft pick. Even then, unless you get a can’t miss prospect, you’re going to spend a couple years or more developing the guy. Then again, ask the Portland Trailblazers about drafting “can’t miss” guys. They just lost Oden for the season. AGAIN. New Jersey is lucky to have Brook Lopez, but uh…..they’ve only won one game this year. Can’t blame Lopez for that, but at the same time it’s obvious that there is more to this game then simply having a big, capable center.
So, what do we do? If you can’t fix the problem you want to fix the most, then perhaps you move to the next biggest problem. What do you think that is, and how can it be solved?
The whole argument about Horford and centers has about run it’s course with me. We all know he’s the best center we have, and we may not see any change there anytime soon. Then again, I could be dead wrong. But it’s unreasonable to just expect Sund to $hit a center out of his ass. He tried to get us Chris Kaman, back before Childress left. Didn’t work out. He may try it again, I don’t know. I know the dude likes his big men, so the fact that we don’t have better ones means to me that some plans have either failed due to other circumstances, or not been approved by ownership, is what I’m guessing. But hey, what do I know (nothing, really)?
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
8:14 pm
Ray its a combination of both one was gasoline the other was fire.
Sautee
December 7th, 2009
8:19 pm
Here’s some hypocrisy for you…..
The same person who said this:
“To win 50 games, with out a legit center and a slow point guard is definitely an accomplishment.”
in the SAME POST said this:
“I am very happy with the team and its direction and its about time for Sund co-sign.”
How happy are you with the team and its direction when you think two of the starters are a detriment to winning 50 games?
You can NOT have it both ways. You are b!tching about the Hawks in their best season in over 10 years. You tell others to enjoy it, but you keep on b!tching about Horford over and over and over. You said you’d be happy with 15 and 10 from Al. He’s giving 13.6 and 9.8 a quarter of the way into the season, even though he’s once again, at best, the 4th option on offense. And he’s doing it, according to you, being totally outmanned physically. And instead of praising him for what he’s done, you rail to replace him and have him come off the bench.
I can understand if you don’t like his game, that’s YOUR call, and your right to think so, but do NOT tell us how happy you are with the team while vilifying a key member. It makes no sense and it’s hypocritical.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
8:21 pm
Where do I co-sign Big Ray? Ditto.
JeJe
December 7th, 2009
8:24 pm
“You obviously know absolutely nothing about basketball, most certainly winning basketball. Please actually pay attention to the games, instead of just watching a sportscenter highlight and looking at the game stats. The Hawks are not a joke, you are.”
Yeah you sure didn’t insult me there, Daniel. And the fact that the Nets have the worst record ever has nothing to do with the game Sunday. It’s about how they play against us, not their record. And the past 2 years against them seems to indicate to me that they own us and will likely win. Go do your Pre-Algebra homework since you seem like you’re probably in 6th grade at some nerd school
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
8:27 pm
The only thing I don’t agree with is the switching defense. We actually are winning in spite of it. For example, look how we got beat when Smith got ejected from the New York game. Everybody wants to blame Horford for not protecting the rim, but forgets that this switch defense is exactly what kept drawing him AWAY from the rim.
Mike D’Antoni knew this, and they kept running plays that brought David Lee away from the basket, which pulled Horford right along with him. That left protecting the rim up to Marvin and a bunch of guards. It failed, as expected, and the Knicks ran us out of the gym with layups.
We win because we can play enough lock-down defense for enough stretches in games, and because we can score. Dallas was one game that we won without scoring, only because the Mavs shot nearly as bad as we did, because we defended the heck out of them as well. That, and Joe actually shot well (’cause no one else was). But if teams find ways to exploit our switching, then we have to outscore them.
Sautee
December 7th, 2009
8:29 pm
A quote from Mike Woodson:
“If we can get Al at about 12 or 13 points and double digit rebounds…then we’re talking.”
If he’s giving us exactly what the COY asks, why are we complaining?
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
8:50 pm
Ray your above post is a gem. Its where I’m at with the big picture but it has beeen difficult finding someone to go there with.
In my opinion this problem of getting of the few good centers is not new to the NBA. Its about as old as the league. Being a GM is not a unskilled position. Behind the doors , there is leverage, dirty pool, hustles and moves. Thats why I posed the question earlier(an echo from a question some one else asked) Why is the Boston Celtics interested in whether Sund offers a Contract to Woodson? There is some ulterior motive why the Celtics publicity page is pumping this story, seeing that we are fast becoming their chief challengers and have proven we can kick their butts. Message sent! So why are they running this players comment story about Woodson? Is it possible Woodson has Docs number and they need to disrupt our growth? Remember when Detroit put that move on us with the Kontact Move?- (credit theZaZaGuy ).
Woodson is good for the Hawks and they are within a year or two…. a player or two from the top. Boston knows this, just like Detroit knew back in the day.
Im sure you caught the link. But just in case;
http://www.celticsblog.com/2009/12/7/1189120/should-woodson-get-extension-hawk
Its up to Sund now to show his talents or lack there of. How good is his pool. How strong is his hustle? Can he force a hand, use some leverage?
He built Dallas but they have never crested the top, never got over the hump stuck in the good but not great mode. Is this going to be the Hawks destiny too?
Grandad
December 7th, 2009
8:56 pm
Big Ray:
Interesting that you noticed TS and myself have a similar viewpoint.
Never have I endorsed trading Al. Simply a long, athletic , defensive
minded, preferrably high energy [5].
Players I’ve suggested:
Javale McGee,7′, 7-6 wingspan, athletic, could develop on off.
Andris Biedrins,7′, lefty, high motor, good shot blocker, FTs. horrible.
Joakim Noah,6-11, high energy, poor sh.form, Got under LBJ’s skin,sh.bl.
None of these players could get Al in return. Only AB would be considered as a starter for us. I’m gonna keep on wishin’ and hopin’ ’cause that’s what I do.
Isn’t it odd that the switching def. would be perfect for BK’s vision of an all 6-9 lineup.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
9:01 pm
Ray we can agree to disagree and move on.
The switch works because of the personnel we have. If a major piece like Josh is taken out of the equation sure, It comes unglued. People blame horford for not being the physical presence that you hope for in a center. OK. I have no problem with that. But like you said. hes the best we have for the spot so we have to play with him there. I don’t think Josh is going to get throw out of every game. I hope not. He has a lot of responsibilities. Just because we compensate for the lack of talent in key area’s with the switch doesn’t mean that the switch is with out weaknesses. It is however the best defense for this team to help Bibby from getting backed down and Horford from getting exploited. When our personnel changes then our options will to.
Right now we are winning considerably more than we are losing. Thats a key point.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
9:03 pm
*In my opinion this problem of getting one the few good centers is not new to the NBA.
Sautee
December 7th, 2009
9:05 pm
Grandad,
I’d take any of the three off the bench. Don’t have any idea how we could get any of them though.
What could this mean?
December 7th, 2009
9:29 pm
- No matter how the Hawks shot the ball, holding Dallas to 75 points in its building is an impressive feat. It’s Dallas’ season low.
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
9:37 pm
Saying AHorford is a NATURAL PF is like saying 6′10″ 240lb Willis Reed was a natural center because he played the position in college and made the Allstar team playing the position. He also became an Allstar playing PF next to center Walt Bellamy as well.
Elvin Hayes was an All American center in college and earned NBA ROY and Allstar honors his rookie yr while playing center. He also earned Allstar honors and won a title or 2 while playing PF next to Wes Unseld, 6′7″ 260lbs HOF and top 50 CENTER, would likely be considered a NATURAL PF by you as well.
Is Allen Iverson a NATURAL PG, because he had his most successful season while playing SG next to PG Eric Snow under HC LBrown. Stop all of this crap about natural this and natural that. Some players are just talented and versatile enough to successfully play more than 1 or 2 positions. If they can do it successfully, they should be labeled NATURAL ATHLETES if anything.
It’s revealing how all of you who are so fond of categorizing Horford as a so called NATURAL PF or undersized center, are the same one’s campaigning for us to acquire another center. And in most cases, the centers most of you want as his replacement, usually aren’t more than an inch taller and not much bigger, if as big. TOO MANY SELF SERVING AGENDAS.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
9:59 pm
Thats a fair point Ken. A lot of GM ’s draft best player available.
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
10:05 pm
TRUTH SERUM-The Hawks are already in the 6th yr of their rebuilding plan under Woodson and you’re saying he needs another 2yrs to get there. He’s gotten rid of all but 3 of our previous draft picks, and he’s taking so long to get the job done the only FA signees on the roster that he’s willing to play will be approaching retirement soon.
In other words, you’re saying that although we’ve made the playoffs 2 consecutive yrs, won 47gms and advanced to the 2nd rd of last yrs playoffs, Woodson needs another 2yrs to do better? Hell, during Woodson’s 8yr plan, the Hawks will have had 2GM’s, ownership will have resolved their legal issues and Teague’s rookie contract will be expiring while we’re still waiting on Woodson to make this team better within the next 2yrs, WOW. I GUESS IT’S OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE THAT NO OTHER HC COULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB WITH THIS TEAM OVER A 6YR PERIOD THAN WOODSON, WITH ANOTHER 2YRS NEEDED TO FINISH THE JOB.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
10:14 pm
I almost forgot why I don’t have conversation with you. You like to misconstrue what Ive said and twist it to serve your anti-woodson rush limbaugh behavior.
“Woodson is good for the Hawks and they are within a year or two…. a player or two from the top. Boston knows this, just like Detroit knew back in the day.”
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
10:19 pm
They have only had five years of work to make that determination.
Six year Hornets’ coach, Byron Scott, was fired for a 3-6 record following a poor playoff showing the year before.
Seven year Nets’ coach, Lawrence Frank, was fired for working the Nets plan and far harder than his players did.
Mike Woodson’s done everything that has been asked of him for 5 straight years, yet had to survive one reported attempted firing from a GM (Billy Knight) who quit afterwards, and is being scrutinized by that GM’s replacement, Mr. Rick Sund.
To be fair, Sund believed enough to give Woodson a ‘show me more’ two year extension that ends at the end of this season.
It sounds like Woodson is a survivor. But he’s really been far more that. He’s been downright successful – anyway you want you to measure it. So the delay and non-negotiations until this year is finished are, on the surface, simply puzzling.
Yet, through ownership turmoil and a change of general managers, the Atlanta Hawks have improved 5 straight years. Navigating that rise is head coach Mike Woodson.
Is there any truth to Woodson not being a good tactician?
Joe Smith…
So far this year, (it’s) been so good. Every night different teams are going to present us something different. I think he does a good job of watching enough film, him and his staff do a good job of watching that film and trying to put us in the best situation to be successful out there.
Might there even be a bit of similarity between Woodson and Rivers in the people skills department?
Joe Smith…
I haven’t played for Doc, but outside looking in, I can see the resemblance. And if I never played for Coach Woodson, I’d have never known that. So I really can’t speak on both sides but I know he brings a lot of light to our locker room.
Like the stock market, Mike’s team’s annual jumps have climbed a ‘wall of worry’. Or maybe it is a ‘wall of expectations’. From the youngest team in the league to a second round playoff team last season, they have moved forward every…single….year. But, just like the Cavaliers, and just like the Magic before them, they are not without their doubters.
Keeping score? It goes like this…. 13, 26, 30, 37, and 47 wins. This season, the beat goes on as the Hawks are currently 14-6 and two games off the EC lead to the Orlando Magic.
Credit
Should Woodson Get Extension?: Hawk Players Say Yes
Tiny by tenaciousT on Dec 7, 2009 1:17 PM EST
RLP
December 7th, 2009
10:24 pm
I will be happy to debate the most successful center in the history of the NBA was a 6′ 9″ fellow by the name of Bill Russell.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
10:25 pm
If I were Sund Id sign Woodson to a 3-4 year contract. He deserves it.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
10:26 pm
Moses Malone wasnt bad a 6′9″ either. Height is not always the determining factor in being a center.
Truth-Serum
December 7th, 2009
10:28 pm
Question of the day to me is why is Boston covering the Woodson saga through the players view? Why is Boston concerned?
Ken Strickland
December 7th, 2009
11:55 pm
TRUTH SERUM-without question, Woodson is a survivor, but I’d rather have a quality HC that understands the value of:
(1) a talented, versatile and deep bench.
(2) the need to develop young players, especially PG’s, for the future.
(3) the need to establish a consistent style of play and an identity.
(4) the need to understand that it’s more important to put the team ahead of a players liabilities(Bibby’s poor DEF) or aspirations(making JJ an Allstar).
(5) the ability to be flexible, make adjustments and utilize strategy.
(6) the understanding that it’s better to structure a system around specific talent rather than trying to force ill fitting talent into a preferred system.
Tell me something TRUTH SERUM. How do you explain a team abruptly going from a 11-2 fastbreaking, attacking, ball sharing, dominant rebounding high scoring and shooting team that was either leading or in the top 5 in PPG, APG, RPG, FAST BREAK PTS, PTS IN THE PAINT AND FG% to 3-4 over the next 7GMS while being unable to maintain any of our previous effectiveness in any of the above categories? In fact, our PPG has decreased, we’ve dropped from #5 to #8, and that includes a record setting 146pt gm.
You are quick to insist on giving Woodson most, if not all, of the credit for the teams possitive accomplishments up until the New Orleans loss. Yet, since that gm, you’ve been just as quick to feint ignorance and pretend he’s contributed absolutely nothing to our current 7gm stretch of inconsistency and futility, in which we’ve featured WOODY BALL, except for the Toronto gm.
northcyde
December 8th, 2009
2:18 am
Ken Strick is funny.
He doesn’t want to take a 20 game snapshot to project how we’re playing, but would rather take a 7 game snapshot of inconsistent play, and us that to justify his rants. Of course, he’ll say it’s because it’s the most recent 7 games, but it’s still an innacurate reflection of how this team has played overall.
Honestly, you could spin this anyway you want.
- we’won 14 out of 20 overall
- we’ve won 10 out of our last 14 games
- we’ve lost 4 of our last 7 games
- we’ve won 3 of our last 5 games
Take your pick
To me, the major thing that separates good teams from bad teams, are LOSING STREAKS. Bad teams routinely go through 4 to 8-game losing streaks. Even when they play well for a week, you can’t count on that, because they may lose 6 in a row.
Good teams may have a week or two where they play inconsistent at times. And they might have a real bad stretch ( for them ) in which they may lose 3 to 5 games in a row. But overall, they take care of business.
Great teams hardly ever go through even a 3 game losing streak. They tend to dominate teams, and maybe drop a game here or there against a mediocre team. Most of the losses great teams suffer, are against good teams on the road.
This time last year, we had already gone through a 4-game losing streak. This year . . . . only a 2-game losing streak. And we’re winning games that would’ve been automatic losses last year:
- get embarrassed by the Lakers, but then turn around and gut out a win @ Portland? ( traditionally one of the toughest places to play in the league )
- a bad loss to a Bobcat team ( after traveling cross country ), but turn around and manhandle Denver at home?
- get embarrassed by Orlando, but turn around and win in Philly? ( although they were banged up )
- lose a bad game vs the Knicks, but turn around and win in Dallas? ( a place we hadn’t won at in the Woodson era )
Those are 3 road wins that we’d almost surely lose last year. And the home back to back vs Denver, even without Kenyon Martin, would’ve probably have been a loss as well. By the way, 3 of these wins occured on the 2nd night of a back to back.
It’s ironic though. Most Hawk fans feel that Woody should use his bench more. But in 3 of our last 4 losses, the +/- numbers of Crawford, Zaza, Evans, and Joe Smith have been significantly lower than most of our starters..
Even in the Detroit game, in which JJ shot 5 – 19 FG, he only had a +/- number of -1, while
But here are the +/- numbers of our bench in that game:
Crawford: -7
Zaza: -9
Evans: – 5
Joe Smith: -5
And if you look at the Knick, and Hornet game, it’s the same occurence.
In fact, you saw this trend where most of the bench had a significant negative +/- rating in games, compared to the starters, vs:
Indiana
@ Boston
Portland
Houston
And it’s occuring even when we have only one or two of these guys are on the floor. It’s one of the reasons why the only positive +/- lineup we have, are the lineup with the starters, and the lineup with Crawford in place of Marvin. All other 5 man lineups are either near zero or below zero in the +/- department.
The HAWKS are only showing that they may not be a great team. But they’ve more than shown most of the characteristics of a good team. A team that should win 50+ games.
northcyde
December 8th, 2009
2:36 am
This is how you know that we’re a good team:
- when the #1 complaint about Woody, is his refusal to give decent playing time to our ROOKIE 10th man.
- when bad losses are much more overhyped than good wins
- when people are bytching about our starters playing a lot of minutes, even when the bench sucks, so that we can preserve them for the 2nd half of the year
- when we’re14 – 6, but people act like we should be 18 – 2, with only losses to the Lakers and the Magic
- when no one is complaining about Josh Smith’s shooting a CAREER LOW .577 from the FT line, because he’s playing so great in other areas ( and not taking a lot of jumpshots )
- when no one is even REMOTELY thinking about the teams behind us possibly catching us.
- when people are talking about 2, possibly 3 Hawks making the All-Star team
That’s how you know that we have a good team . . . a real good team here.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 8th, 2009
2:37 am
“this is the type of assertiveness a real center will bring us.”
For the record, I don’t agree at all with your repeated assertions that Horford’s lack of size in the post is hurting the Hawks regularly. But I thought I would mention that Andrew Bynum was picked 8 spots after Marvin Williams, so it’s not like the Hawks didn’t have a chance to draft him.
Just another example of NBA GMs not doing their homework and unfairly undervaluing a player that chose not to play in the NCAA.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 8th, 2009
2:42 am
About the Woodson story on Celticsblog that is the hot topic of discussion today… it’s great that the players like Woody, but it’s important to note that the opinion of the players doesn’t always relate to the coach’s actual effectiveness. Jim Mora and Jim Zorn in the NFL come to mind as ineffective coaches who had the full support of their respective locker rooms. On the flip side, plenty of coaches like Bob Knight treated their players like sh-t and have had great success throughout their careers. Any coach, no matter how ineffective, will have the respect of his players if he shows them respect as well.
I’m not saying this to hate on Woody, who I think has done a pretty good job this year overall, but more just to point out that the opinions of the players is not that important in judging his effectiveness.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 8th, 2009
2:47 am
Also, comparing heights of players 40 years ago to heights of players now is stupid. Elgin Baylor scored 27 points per game as a 6′5″ forward. As someone pointed out earlier, Bill Russell won 11 titles at 6′9″ playing center. Forty years ago, the idea of a 6′9″ 260 pound player initiating the offense from the perimeter would have been unthinkable. Players have gotten significantly bigger since the beginning of the NBA. Keep your comparisons limited to the last twenty years or so.
KevinA
December 8th, 2009
4:49 am
Big Ray
December 7th, 2009
7:45 pm
But the problem begins at guard. Which is why our undersized frontcourt is continually exposed….
That qualify’s for the thought of the night.
When we signed Jamal, Bibby and drafted Teague we gave up on any idea of defending the pg position. JJ, Bibby,and Jamal seem to match up better against the bigger guards but get torched on a regular basis against the small quick guards. We are just to slow to stay in front of them or stay with them.
Thank god for Josh or we would be even more exposed.
Most games our guards score well enough to compensate for their defensive liabilities but when their shots are off, these are the games we lose. When the JJ shot is off against the teams with quick guards what is Woody to do. Replace spotty defense with little to none? Instead of Collins maybe we should look for another guard who can defend.
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
6:35 am
Ken, I happen to be of the same mind set as North Clyde. I think you are micro analyzing to justify your view, which, has clearly been proven erroneous.I am enjoy this season. The team is play @or above the “Professional”, analyst prediction. We keep getting better and better. Whether you look at this in 10or 20 game snippets we are doing very well. I think its better to look at it in the first half of the season and the second half. You seem desperate. If you dont mind, I wont bother you but Im going to try and connect with people who are excited about the direction the hawks are moving in and are joyfully dancing about this season.
May I suggest that maybe you could create a doom and gloom blog page, and every five minutes you can look for a reason to tear down the Hawks successes. Yes, right now…Woodson= COY
Good post NorthClyde!
Najeh Davenpoop. That’s a point well taken. There were 7 other teams that passed on him too…. which doesn’t excuse us. But your point is exact. As hard as it is to get a legit center and a corner stone of a franchise how could we….
That still hurts to day. Had we made the right choice we wouldn’t have to worry about our guards getting beat as KevinA is addressing. A good center changes the why the game is played. Defending guards will slant you towards their center and dare you to cut that way and cover you from the other angle.
Also every one wants a quick guard.They get faster every year it seems. The younger ones are faster than the older ones and the smaller ones over the bigger ones. At one point there was a move on to switch to big guards. Magic became the prototype, A 6′9″ point guard who could handle the ball and run like a gazelle. It turned out he was a freak of nature and a rare find.
The center is usually the fail safe against getting beat in the paint against guards whose sole purpose is to break down defenses by penetrating the paint and scoring or dishing.
KevinA and I have agreed to disagree with out radical confrontation or disrespect. We actually agree on most point. Our area of disagreement is whether the defense and or offense starts inside as i believe or outside as Kevin subscribes.
Id rather have the center as assurance in case you beat my guard to the spot. Kevin, I believe, would rather have a guard that you cant beat.
All of that to say although I don’t completely agree, Kevin, I enjoy your post and can see the merit in your point.
Yes, thank God for Josh!
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
6:36 am
Northclyde very good post!
Daniel
December 8th, 2009
8:48 am
JeJe- This will be the last time I post anything on this subject with you. My statement was made in response to your statement that “LOL @THIS TEAM’S RECORD. WE HAVE A GARBAGE COACH THAT OVER USES THE STARTERS. WHAT A JOKE. THIS TEAM IS A TEASE” You of course based this assertion on the fact that Devin Harris and Brook Lopez would completely dominate the Hawks, Horford “self-proclaimed superstar” (can anyone tell me when Horford described himself as a superstar?) would be smacked around, etc…
I do realize the error of my ways in addressing anyone who posts in all caps. Clearly, I made a mistake there, and since you are not willing to remain civil, I would again ask you not to address me in the future.
Mike is back
December 8th, 2009
9:17 am
Truth-Serum, appreciate ya broooooooooooo. Ken is still holding out…but it appears ESPN is starting to buy in. lol
SEE YA @ THE BULLS GAME!!
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JeJe
December 8th, 2009
9:33 am
I assure you Horford thinks he’s a superstar
Clyde
December 8th, 2009
9:36 am
Dudes name is Northcyde not Northclyde.
KEN STRICKLAND FOR BLOGGER OF THE YEAR
TIM TEBOW FOR CRYBABY OF THE YEAR
FIRE WOODY
Ken Strickland
December 8th, 2009
10:13 am
NORTHCLYDE-talk about spinning it any way you want. What I actually said was you can’t use a 20gms sample to project the potential outcome for the entire season. I didn’t say you couldn’t use it to judge how the team was currently performing. And along those lines, how would you say the Hawks are currently performing? Do you judge them by the first 13gms(11-2), the last 7(3-4), or do you single out gms like the Toronto blowout(146pts) or the strong Dallas win and pretend everything else is fine, since we’re 14-6.
When we were winning 11 out of our first 13 gms, we were doing the following:
(1) Playing uptempo, pushing the ball and attacking the basket rather than settling for jumpshots and playing ISO and one on one.
(2) Scoring a lot of easy NBA leading fastbreak baskets, which allowed us to average 108PPG, which ranked 5th.
(3) Rank near the top of the NBA in RPG, APG and OFF RPG.
(4) Lead the NBA in pts in the paint, which were high percentage shots that allowed us to lead the NBA in shooting percentage.
(5) Effectively utilized a 10 man rotation that took pressure off the starters.
Starting with the loss against New Orleans, can you say we’ve come close to matching any of the above accomplishments? Do we ignore the fact we’ve suddenly done what amounts to a 180 degree turnaround in what we so successfully did during that streak. Because we’re 14-6, do we ignore the fact we’ve gone from averaging 108PPG during that 13gm stretch, to suddenly having trouble reaching 90pts.
Because we still have a winning record, do we pretend not to notice we’ve gone from leading the NBA in wins and other OFF categories to a stagnant, jumpshooting, ISO, one on one team that struggles to score and win. Because we’re 14-6 do we continue pretending not to notice how teams are now outrebounding and scoring more fastbreak and pts in the paint than us, while shooting a higher percentage. We were NBA leaders in these areas during our streak.
Do we pretend not to notice how Woodson has gone into his coaching shell and started to totally ignore his bench beyond a 7-8 man rotation. What about the fact he’s started to ride JJ’s back to the tune of 40+mpg just 20gms into the season. Hell, he’s already coaching scared. But that’s all right, because we’re 14-6.
After being 7gms removed from our solid, if not spectacular start, why can’t or won’t Woodson get the team back to doing the things that were done to get us off to that solid start? Why add fuel to the fire of our 7gms stetch of inconsistency and futility by continuing to do all of the things as a HC that has contributed to these types of lulls in the past?
BUT, ACCORDING TO SOME, WE HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT. WOODSON IS DOING AN OUTSTANDING JOB, AND WE’RE STILL 14-6, EVEN THOUGH WE’RE PLAYING POORLY IN EVERY PHASE OF THE GM AND STRUGGLING TO DEFEAT WEAK TEAMS AT HOME. AFTER ALL, WOODSON LED US TO THAT 11-2 EARLY SEASON MARK, AND ALL OF OUR CURRENT STRUGGLES CAN BE ATTRIBUTED JJ, MARVIN, HORFORD, BIBBY AND/OR SMOOVE, BUT NOT WOODSONS. THESE PLAYERS JUST GOT TIRED OF RUNNING, SCORING, REBOUNDING, PASSING, GOING INSIDE, DEFENDING, WINNING AND PLAYING AN UPTEMPO STYLE OF BALL AND DECIDED THEY WOULD MUCH RATHER PLAY WOODY BALL AND STRUGGLE IN EVERY PHASE OF THE GM. BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Since we’re starting our 2nd set of 20gms, we’re due to immediately come out of our OFF/DEF funk and start another 7gm winning streak and win 11 out of 13. It can happen, especially if we pretend we’re still playing like the team that played the first 13gms instead of the current team that’s struggled to win 3 of the last 7.
ILL-logical
December 8th, 2009
10:28 am
An observation about the difference in the Hawk’s performance since the New Orleans game: that was when Bibby was injured and since then the team(read coach) has slowed the tempo down and been less active on defence.,prehaps in deference to his injury.
Ken Strickland
December 8th, 2009
10:59 am
ILL-LOGICAL-you’ve made an excellent point, and it goes straight to my comment about Woodson putting the limitations and/or asperations of certain players ahead of team interests. No thinking HC with any type of coaching ability would completely alter the entire OFF approach of a team that’s winning at an 11-2 clip and enjoying a 7gm winning streak would jeopodize all of that to accomodate an already slow footed PG when he has greased lightning on the bench in Teague. He should have benched Bibby and taken advantage of an excellent opportunity to give Teague some valuable time running a team that was dominating the NBA at the time.
A good HC will aways seize an opportunity to turn a negative into a positive, not make a bad situation worse. I have absolutely no doubt Woodson wants to win a badly as anyone associated with the gm. But, he seems obcessed with wanting to win with his players and team playing the halfcourt, jumpshooting, guard dominated, DEF minded style of ball he seems to value and cherish above all else, instead of the fastbreaking, uptempo, attacking style that results show favors his players and team.
I DON’T WANT HIM FIRED BECAUSE HE’S NOT A GOOD HC, BUT BECAUSE AT THIS POINT, HE’S PROVEN NOT TO BE A GOOD HC FOR THE HAWKS.
Jay
December 8th, 2009
12:46 pm
A few not-so-quick, not-very-short and not-too-random thoughts:
GM Rick Sund has made no secret of management desire to emulate the mid-2000’s version of the Detroit Pistons. I recall that their second unit (C Elden Campbell, F Mehmet Okur, F Corliss Williamson, G Mike James, and G Lindsey Hunter) came off the bench to start the second and fourth quarter of each game by playing a pressing, trapping and harassing type of defense led to easy baskets which often got them back into games when they were trailing or turned small lead into a big one. In short, that second unit was a major reason for their success. If the Hawks’ second unit does none of these things, how can they really emulate those Pistons?
Now that the Hawks know they’ll make the playoffs this year, I would like to see them open the second and fourth quarters of the next ten to twenty games with Morris at Center, Joe Smith and Othello Hunter at forward with Jamal Crawford and Jeff Teague at guard. Give this unit 3-6 minutes each half, employ that pressing, trapping and harrassing type of defense and let’s see what they can do. Develop the bench now and it could pay great dividends later; especially if Morris develops into a true low-post presence.
Speaking of a low-post presence, no team wins a championship without one. Now before anyone mentions Jordan’s Bulls, let me remind you that guys like Bill Cartwright, Artis Gilmore, and Luc Longley gave them a low-post “presence”. When Joe Smith is your best low-post presence—and he’s on your second unit—you really have no low-post presence; and no shot to win a title.
On this blog, there are some have used statistics to prove their position. What’s the old saying about lies and statistics? For every stat about someone being a good player or coach, there’s another stat that gives credence to the opposite position. Using stats to justify a position is about as useful as hitching a plow to a cat—you may be able to do it but you won’t get much accomplished.
For those advocating Mike Woodson for Coach of the Year, be careful of what you wish for. Consider this: of the last five Coach of the Year winners, four (D’Antoni, Avery Johnson, Sam Mitchell and Byron Scott) have been fired less than three years after winning the award and last year’s winner-Mike Brown-is on the hot seat this year.
Speaking of Woodson, and with apologies to Shakespeare, to keep him or not to keep him; that is the question; one that has evoked strong opinions on either side of the issue on this blog. There are those who say he should be retained because his players hold him in high regard. OK–but name me one player in his right mind who is going to say anything negative about his Head Coach–the person in control of playing time—in a setting where those words could get back to the Head Coach; landing him on the bench or in the doghouse. Don’t rush—I’ll wait. You won’t find out the truth about him from his players until after he’s gone—much like you don’t find out about how badly your girlfriend was cheating on you until after the two of you break up.
For those who think he should be retained because of his record, consider this: Rick Carlisle and Larry Brown were both fired after 50-win seasons; by that same Detroit franchise that GM Rick Sund holds in such high regard.
Here’s the true measure of a coach: does he pass the eye-ball test. By that I mean, does he do all of the things we associate with good coaches. Does his team display a consistency in their offensive and defensive approaches to the game? Does his team seek to impose its will on their opponents or does his team play to the level of its competition? Does his approach create roles for his players that emphasize their strengths while minimizing their weaknesses? Do his players accept their roles in his system and stay within them? Does he maximize his team’s chances to win by making the appropriate in-game adjustments? Does he delegate properly–managing the game itself while letting his assistants coach the offensive and defensive strategies? Do young players know they will get an opportunity to play, in order to develop within the team’s system, secure in the knowledge that they’ll still get playing team when they make the mistakes all young players make in order to learn and grow? Does he command respect from the opposition?
In other words, if you didn’t know anything about him, his personality, the personalities of the players on his team or his record, and you just watch his team’s performance, would you honestly say that his team is a well-coached squad? That’s the eyeball test and should be the only factor Sund uses when deciding whether Woodson should be retained–especially after six years.
FYI–Adrian Dantley (followed years later by Mark Aguirre) was the low-post offensive presence in the starting line-up for Chuck Daly’s Pistons of the late 80’s-early 90’s while the defensive low-post presence Bill Laimbeer and Rick Mahorn gave the team its Bad Boy image. 7”1” C James Edwards gave the second unit an offensive low-post presence while combining with John Salley and Dennis Rodman for a defensive low-post presence.
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
1:00 pm
Jay
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
1:04 pm
A very long winded expose, but its wrong. Player coaches squawks are legendary. No These players are happy and enjoy playing for woodson. Excellent chemistry.
Sorry.
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
1:05 pm
player/coaches squawks
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
1:09 pm
FYI weve already said that and we were talking about the championship pistons not the non champions.
Truth-Serum
December 8th, 2009
1:11 pm
I guess youd like to think that you covered both sides but you did not. You only made the case for his getting fired. Whatever.
northcyde
December 8th, 2009
3:20 pm
And the name is northcyde . . . as in side = cyde. Not northclyde. LOL @ clyde pointing that out.
EXTEND WOODY
northcyde
December 8th, 2009
3:37 pm
I hope my comments aren’t being censored on here. I thought my long winded post was a good one? I’ve posted it twice, but I don’t even see it.
LOL . . this is why I stay on the Squawk.
Fundamentals
December 8th, 2009
4:06 pm
I’m lovin the ability of this team to grind out clutch wins on the road, we just gotta work on professoinalism when we’re playing scrubs.
I think our team does have an identity, though it’s inconistent.
We are going to be a 3 or 4 seed.
We need the 1/2 court game as much as we need the run & gun. It’ll provide balance in the playoffs.
Bibby has reponded well to Crawford & Teague. Props to him for seeming to like the transistion. Maybe a player coach in 3 years?
Al is showing alot of development on offense. Keep up the intensity on D!
2nd unit looked very nice against Dallas. I thought Woody should’ve left them out there longer.
Josh says he learned alot and he’s grown up, but he’s still got a binky and a blanket at times. Last few games have been difficult to watch in terms of his play. Stepping up to manhood = ALLSTAR!
Marvin seems to be plugging in more. I liked his effort of late. It’s not always points, but he is contributing again.
Joe looked like a captain and an All-Star against Dallas. Good shoulders to ride on again. Thanks!
Woody – Trust the bench, encourage the D and rebounding.
Joe Smith – as influential as Crawford of late.
ZaZa – needs to get his fire again. Better effort, but we’ve seen better Z!
Teague – seems to be settling in more. I liked his effort of late and it seems Woody does too.
Moe – just play D, we need your 3’s as much as we need Josh’s.
Randmo – I’m a believer this year. Get in the game!
Collins – How much are the all you can eat seats bro?
Hunter – I wish you’d show up in uniform someday. Seems to be a bigger waste than leaving Collins shipwrecked on the bench.
I still think we’ll win 55 games, possibly more if we grow up and become consistent after Christmas.
No All-Stars = Much needed rest for our starters!
Fundamentals
December 8th, 2009
4:08 pm
Noah’s going to need an ark to withstand Horford’s storm!
ken
December 9th, 2009
11:23 am
It really does not matter how many wins the Hawks improve because that should not be the goal. The goal is winning in the playoffs and untilmately winning the championship. Yes , they will win more games in the regular season but unless they make move to get a starting center and move Horford to power forward, they will lose in the second round because this key thing. Are there any word about trying to trade for a center or are the Hawks content to win a few more games and make to the playoffs?