Hawks-Pistons

What’s up?

Hope all are well and enjoying the last day of Thanksgiving break. Looks pretty good for the Hawks this afternoon, you’d think. Detroit is without Rip HamiltonTayshaun Prince and most likely Ben Gordon and have lost seven in a row.

Nothing is beyond possible in the NBA – remember Golden State beating Dallas on the road with six guys last week. Every team on a losing streak has to win at some point, and all that. But this would look like a game you’d think the Hawks can go for the kill early and play the second unit.

I’m actually on my way to the Falcons game helping out Darryl Ledbetter, so I don’t think I’ll be on much, but will be curious to read what you all have to say.

Happy armchair coaching!

400 comments Add your comment

niremetal

November 29th, 2009
12:50 pm

Watch out for Will Bynum.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:02 pm

Damn the game had to come on the same time as the falcons lol

Big Ray

November 29th, 2009
1:08 pm

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:10 pm

Big Ray do u think Marvin the duck will walk to the wrong bench this game lol

KevinA

November 29th, 2009
1:10 pm

Lets make this the give the ball to Al game.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:17 pm

I wonder if teague is gonna play more than 4 mins 2day

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
1:19 pm

Hawks first six shots have been jumpers. While the pistons have scored their 8 of their 11pts in the paint…

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:20 pm

No rebounding at all

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:24 pm

Glad to see Marvin playing well….. so far

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:25 pm

NOw that Marvin is playing well Woody takes him out. Damn Woody is dumb.

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
1:26 pm

Marvin is off to a good start. Why did Woody take him out the game? He should have took Joe out…

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:26 pm

I know where not getting done up by Kwame Brown

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
1:27 pm

The Pistons are killing the Hawks in the paint.

Mike N.

November 29th, 2009
1:27 pm

Just what I was thinking Bone…Marvin is active, let him play. And now is the time to put in a guard who can pressure Bynum and Stucky…where are you Teague

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
1:28 pm

Oh my goodness… Josh with a coast to coast dunk….

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:30 pm

Man Woody is holding this team back. Whenever someone is off to a good start Woody ruins the flow of the game instead of letting em play

KevinA

November 29th, 2009
1:31 pm

Who says Josh should pass to a guard.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:32 pm

Joe Ball Hoggin again. Damn go somewhere Joe.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:37 pm

Teague had sex with Woody’s daughter

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:38 pm

Hawks gettin man handled

Mike N.

November 29th, 2009
1:38 pm

Mike N.

November 29th, 2009
1:41 pm

We are 12-4 on talent alone yet Woody will get all the credit. The way he is coaching however will only result in a tired team by March or April. He needs to utilize and play his bench for extended periods of time…thats why Sund got these guys for him

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:46 pm

Put Teague in dammit

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:46 pm

Joe is doo doo

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:47 pm

No defense being played

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
1:51 pm

SMH… Why can’t Joe take advantage of the guy (that’s 4 inch shorter) guarding him???????

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
1:54 pm

Ok, nice spurt by the Hawks to cut the lead to 1…

BONE

November 29th, 2009
1:55 pm

And teague hasn’t gotten in the game yet

Mike N.

November 29th, 2009
1:59 pm

at least get Marvin a couple shots before the half and see if you can find a hot hand

niremetal

November 29th, 2009
2:01 pm

The rebounding is just embarrassing.

Mike N.

November 29th, 2009
2:01 pm

blocked again…Marvin is incapable of getting a shot off in traffic

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:01 pm

Hawks collapsing again

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:02 pm

Teague 0 MINS

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:04 pm

Pistons goes on a 10-3 run as soon as Josh left the game to end the half. And at least 7pts was scored on Marvin…. Good thing Crawford hit that 3 to end the half…

KevinA

November 29th, 2009
2:08 pm

JJ not being able to shoot is an issue.

vava74

November 29th, 2009
2:12 pm

what a bleeping meltdown to end the half!! good grief! this team has serious mental issues…

it’s all lack of poise and maturity…

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:22 pm

Man I don’t even know what to say about this team. Soooooo Inconsistent

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:23 pm

I guess these refs aren’t getting paid by the calls. A total of 12 foul calls in the 1st half. A total of 8 freethrows shot in the 1st half. 2 of the Hawks 3 freethrows were techs… You dont have to look far to see why the Hawks are down by 8 at the half. Oh yeah, they were outrebounded by 17…

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:24 pm

Put Teague in the F*CKIN game

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:26 pm

This team needs to a coaching change seriously. They always look soooooooooo lethargic. They obviously need something to change.

Jamaaliver

November 29th, 2009
2:27 pm

This blog is horrible. There’s no effort put in at all.

:(

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
2:30 pm

This blog is pretty bad. The state of AJC Hawks is in the sh*tter. I mean, where are the articles? The blogs have no content. All they tell us is the scouting report and that the Hawks need to fight hard. Our interim beat writer isn’t even with the team.

Can I take over this job? I’ll go on leave as a student at UGA and travel with the team, will write with emotion, and will do this job FREE of CHARGE. Let me interact with the players and coaches, rather than letting some guy half-ass his way on here.

Ken Sugiura

November 29th, 2009
2:31 pm

hey, all-
sounds like i’m missing a great game. (kidding)
if it’s any consolation, the falcons-bucs game isn’t much better. falcons are having trouble stopping a 1-9 team.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:32 pm

Can Woodson use the bench at all

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:33 pm

Hawks getting pounded on the Boards

vava74

November 29th, 2009
2:34 pm

16 to 41 rebounds!! we are making Ben Wallace look young!!!!

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
2:34 pm

Pistons don’t even have Rip, Prince, Wilcox, or Gordon, and we’re LOSING?

Are you !@#%ing serious?

Why don’t we change up the starting lineup? We will lose this game and Woody will just run the starters’ legs down like he always does. J*sus Christ.

Wait, Marvin has 9 points. That’s his season average! Mission Accomplished for him! This makes me sick. You got Al Horford tweeting every damn pregame about how relaxed he is and chilling. When is the last time he put in extra hours on game tape? His posting up is almost atrocious, the amount of times he loses the ball.
How the hell is Woody gonna let us lose to his former team that is WITHOUT 3 STAR PLAYERS

WE HAD A DAY OFF. WTF IS THIS GARBAGE?

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:35 pm

When was the last the Pistons scored without getting an offensive reb first???

nunna yo buzinezz

November 29th, 2009
2:37 pm

im gonna try to run from room to room..my desktop is in one room,my tv in another,lol..

no reason not to pull joe for crawford now..
no reason not to bring in a 7 footer to help control the boards..
no reason not to ADJUST your scheme now,woody!!
and,its not reason not to tell,not ask your team,woody,to take less jumpers and drive more to the hoop…

all in all..we’re not gonna see no adjustments..u will see joe and crawford in together,and u will not see teague until this thing is a blowout..
my gametime of sending this response is ,4:06 in da 3rd..pistons 65-atl 57

BONE

November 29th, 2009
2:42 pm

THis team is be tired soon. Woodson’s dumbazz refuses to use his bench.

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:43 pm

Joe is playing like garbage… Try passing the ball. Its ok if he decide to defer some on offense. My goodness…

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:47 pm

Look like Joe Smith will get another DNP in the 2nd half…

nunna yo buzinezz

November 29th, 2009
2:47 pm

crawford enters the game..
joe still struggling and in as well..
players are going to the hoop and at the end of the 3rd,its 67-65 pistons..

im kinda in da middle on getting teague in now..we have come back,and i don’t woody or u woody lovers blaming teague for anything..having said that..the start of the 4th should be da best time to bring him in

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:49 pm

I would prefer to see Joe Smith in the game at the 4 than Marvin. Marvin is struggling big time…

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
2:58 pm

Joe and Marvin has two of the worst on court body language in the league. They should be banned from being teammates….

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:03 pm

Joe is terrible

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:03 pm

Trade Joe and Marvin for Bosh

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:04 pm

And thats game

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
3:07 pm

What a sorry basketball team. Another awful effort. Looking worse than we did against NOH.

hey Woody, GREAT idea doing switches on EVERY PICK N ROLL. PUTTING HORFORD ON BYNUM AT THE 3 PT LINE IS BRILLIANT! LARRY BROWN TAUGHT YOU WELL

Can we please either suspend or trade Joe and Marvin. These guys stink.

And I better not see any excuses. we did NOT play last night

niremetal

November 29th, 2009
3:07 pm

Problem 1: Rebounding
Problem 2: Rebounding
Problem 3: Rebounding
Problem 4: Doesn’t really matter, because problems 1-3 are what lost us this game. We’re shooting a higher percentage. But they have taken 17 more shots than us because they’ve been killing us on the boards.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:08 pm

NEWSFLASH EVERYBODY TEAGUE HASN’T PLAYED STINKIN MINUTE

UGA

November 29th, 2009
3:09 pm

I love Joe, but as of late, him turning down the extension in the offseason may be a blessing. How many bad games in a row does LeBron, Kobe or Wade have??? Joe is for sure not in the category with these guys. He’s just a good NBA player period.

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
3:10 pm

What a sorry basketball team. Another awful effort. Looking worse than we did against NOH.

hey Woody, GREAT idea doing switches on EVERY PICK N ROLL. PUTTING HORFORD ON BYNUM AT THE 3 PT LINE IS BRILLIANT! LARRY BROWN TAUGHT YOU WELL.

Can we please either suspend or trade Joe and Marvin. These guys stink.

And I better not see any excuses. we did NOT play last night

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:11 pm

I MEANT TO SAY TEAGUE HASN’T PLAYED ONE STINKING MINUTE

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
3:12 pm

WE GET KILLED ON BOARDS AND DONT EVEN PUT IN ONE OF OUR F*CKING 7 FOOT BIGS TO HELP CURE THE PROBLEM.

WE HAVE MARVIN WHO IS SUPPOSED TO HIT OPEN SHOTS, BUT HE CANT

THIS TEAM IS GARBAGE. CANT BEAT A FREAKING DETROIT TEAM WITHOUT ITS 3 BEST PLAYERS. JOE IS NOT ELITE

AmpK

November 29th, 2009
3:12 pm

Take Bibby(no defense,Byum is Killing him), Joe(No passion), and Marvin(I can’t score when it counts) out of the game. Woody ( I can’t coach against anyone) needs to use his bench more often, he is reverting back to his old self.

AmpK

November 29th, 2009
3:14 pm

ooh yeah the other birds are sucking also

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:15 pm

Truth Sayer

November 29th, 2009
3:15 pm

Hawks and Falcons are turning back into the Hawks and Falcons..

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:17 pm

This team is a dissapointment

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
3:19 pm

Dang, Rodney Stuckey looks like 50 cent…

Typical Blogger

November 29th, 2009
3:19 pm

I hate Player X. Therefore it is Player X’s fault that the Hawks are losing.

I like Player Y. Therefore he should get more minutes and get the ball more. We lost because he didn’t.

I don’t care about what actually happened during the game. Player X sucks and Player Y rulez.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:21 pm

Joe needs to be traded because he isn’t gonna re-sign with the hawks. We have to get something for him. Marvin needs to be traded as well

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:23 pm

TEAGUE 0 MINUTES

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:23 pm

WHAT THE HELL IS JOSH DOIN

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:23 pm

TERRIBLE GAME BY THE HAWKS AND THE FALCONS

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
3:24 pm

Not a good 3pt shot attempt by Josh. Thats the nail in the coffin….

AmpK

November 29th, 2009
3:25 pm

I don’t blame Josh for that shot…his teammates haven’t made shots all game. I really think JJ is only concerned about himself.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:25 pm

TEAGUE PLAYED 0 MINUTES

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:26 pm

TEAGUE 0 MINUTES….

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:26 pm

TEAGUE 0 MINUTES..

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
3:26 pm

WORST COACHED HALF EVER

WHERE IS THE BENCH? WE SIGNED JASON COLLINS FOR A REASON.

ITS OBVIOUS MAXIELL AND B.WALLACE ARE TOO BIG FOR SMOOVE AND HORFORD.. BUT NO, ALL WOODSON WANTS IS HIS DAMN CONTRACT SO HE’LL RUN OUR STARTERS INTO THE GROUND

WHY THE HELL DONT U FOUL BEN WALLACE OR MAXIELL AT THE END? FORCE THEM TO GET THE BALL?

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:27 pm

TEAGUE 0 MINUTES.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:28 pm

TEAGUE 0 MINUTES 0_0

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
3:28 pm

THIS IS WHY THIS TEAM WILL NEVER CONTEND

AWFUL EFFORTS ONT EH ROAD. JAMAL CRAWFORD WAS 8-12, YET JOE IS SUCH A DAMN BALLHOG WHO IS SO CONCERNED WITH HIS CONTRACT YR THAT HE NEGATES EVERYTHING CRAWFORD CAN DO. EVERY SINGLE PLAY WE RUN SHOULD BE A CRAWFORD ISO WITH PLAYERS CUTTING TO THE BASKET

BONE

November 29th, 2009
3:28 pm

..TEAGUE 0 MINUTES

Moxie

November 29th, 2009
3:30 pm

I promise you, the Hawks Achillies heel are playing crappy teams away. For some reason, probabaly they figure they have the game in the bag, but they don’t try against crappy teams. Is this really supposed to be an “elite” team. Speaking out of frustration from watching them, I’ll say no but it’s a long season and I would request Joe to start playing like he wants that huge contract.
-Moxie

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
3:31 pm

WOODSON DOES NOT USE THE BENCH AT ALL

I DONT CARE IF I’M KNEE JERK REACTING

ITS OBVIOUS OUR LACK OF A BENCH USAGE IS KILLING US. I SEE AJ GET 15 AGAINST US TEH OTHER NIGHT. ALL WE DO IS USE JAMAL. WHERE THE HELL ARE MO AND TEAGUE? I’M SURE THEY COULD PRODUCE IF GIVEN MORE TAHN 20 SECONDS A GAME

GOD DAMNIT

Mac-Town'z Finest 478

November 29th, 2009
3:32 pm

Hey guys….for the most part this is the same team from last year.

Improvements? Josh stopped jacking up as many 3s; Crawford over Flip

The other problem are still the same though. Those slight improvements are not enough to move the hawks up from the 4th/5th area of the east.

If we maintain this same coaching, defensive lapses, poor half court offense, with no size to defend the paint and no real post threats…we can expect to be mauled by Cleve. or Orl. in the playoffs

Peter

November 29th, 2009
3:33 pm

Gee I guess the team doesn’t need a BIG, and Marvin is worth all that money for playing soft !

Another stellar performance by Weak Marvin 2 rebounds….what a boy amongst men !

welikebaseball2

November 29th, 2009
3:34 pm

JeJe & BONE: I agree with both of you. I mean, Woodson can’t make shots for his guys but he could do a lot more to put them in position for easy buckets. I don’t know if he really is as clueless as it seems when it comes to drawing up offensive plays. If not, as a coach, you’ve GOT to pull guys that are taking the team out of the sets with one-on-one play. I just get the feeling it’s Woodson calling all these iso’s. You bring your top scorer off the bench to spell your starting PG & he either keeps you in the game by hitting half the tons of shots he puts up or shoot you out of the game hogging the ball & not giving other guys a chance to get involved. I love Crawford as our 6th man, but I can’t say I’m as impressed with him when he’s running the point. You need a backup PG that can create shots for his teammates, not just himself. Not going overboard & ripping Crawford, it’s more of my hate for Woodson’s offensive schemes…or lack of.

Melvin

November 29th, 2009
3:35 pm

This lost may comeback to haunt the Hawks if they dont steal a win or two during the rest of the season….

Peter

November 29th, 2009
3:36 pm

Bone……. Great Idea…..I would love to get rid of Weak Soft Girly-man Marvin, and ball hog Joe ! Bosh would bang, and compliment the other starters.

Justin

November 29th, 2009
3:40 pm

Peter, you want to get Bosh? How would that lineup work? Horford at 5, Smith at 4 and Bosh at 3? Thats not gonna work. Bosh is outta the question, but Marvin needs to be gone for sure. Same team, new year. Lack of effort did us in. We shot over 50%, but were neutralized by the Pistons ultra hustle and tenacity for the offensive rebound. You cant get out rebounded 27 and expect to win. Same thing as last year, until we learn how to beat bad teams away we will never be elite.

Screwed again

November 29th, 2009
3:42 pm

Great, just great. Woodrow DNPs three players and Joe Johnson shoots us out of the game again.

FIRE WOODROW AND TRADE JOE.

D.carter

November 29th, 2009
3:46 pm

Please woody stick with the pick and roll offense

D.carter

November 29th, 2009
3:47 pm

2nd game joe has shot us out of

little dave

November 29th, 2009
3:49 pm

rubbish absolute rubbish woodson is scared of pulling jj

Big Ray

November 29th, 2009
3:51 pm

We got beaten to death on the boards. Only two guys were rebounding the ball with any effort whatsoever, and that was Josh and Al. Al did about what he normally does (double-double guy), and I wanted to see Josh get more rebounds, but he was active on both ends of the court in that area. That, and I’m not going to yell too much at a guy who is shooting 11-15, blocking 5 shots, and doing plenty of other things.

Bibby had 3 boards, but he’s a 6′1″ point guard.

Marvin has no excuse.

JJ has no excuse. Particularly since he almost singlehandedly kept us from shooting as well as we did. Funny, Joe was the worst shooter on the team (Marvin was as bad, but had less than HALF of Joe’s attempts), yet he took the most shots. Why was he in there for 43 minutes?

Zaza only got 10 minutes, and Joe Smith got less than 5.

Between that and the play calls, I don’t even know what to say about Woody.

Peter

November 29th, 2009
3:52 pm

Justin, I would think just like teams play a three guard line up, we can play two bigs, and Josh at 3 ?

I would think he is quick enough to guard a 3, and he will be a mis-match inside ?

Bosh would bring the same energy that Josh, and Al brings……seems Marvin brings little to no energy, and certainly at 6-9 is about as soft as any guy I have seen.

Hawks73

November 29th, 2009
3:52 pm

The Hawks take too many nights/days off. There really is no excuses for the lack of effort and intensity especially playing against a weakened Piston team. I hate to say this, but this will be a theme that repeats itself for the rest of the season.

Justin

November 29th, 2009
3:56 pm

Mismatch on offense for sure but a liability on defense. Againts the Celtics he would have to guard Pierce? Do you liek that matcup? AGaionst the Cavs, Lebron? Do you liek that matchup? Agaist the Magic, Vince carter? How about that? Hes a good post defender and we dont want to take away his weak side post blocks by making him guard perimeter oriented players. If Horford was two inches taller, Joe wasnt a ball hog, and their effort didnt fluctuate game to game wed be a very good team! Two off which will most likely never happen!

Big Ray

November 29th, 2009
4:03 pm

I have to laugh at anybody who is mad at Josh Smith for a three point attempt near the end of the game.

What did you want, JJ to go 5-20 instead of 5-19? How about Marvin going 3-9, instead of 3-8? Heh…

BONE

November 29th, 2009
4:20 pm

TEAGUE 0 MINS ][][][][][

vava74

November 29th, 2009
4:28 pm

Couldn’t catch the game today. No available feeds.

I actually was expecting this result today. The Hawks have a tendency of under estimating worse opponents, in particular when they are undermanned.

Even without watching the game, it’s easy to pin point the problem: rebounding, which translates into two things: lack of effort and poor coaching.

I don’t like to point the finger to Woody when the players lay an egg, however, there is not *$%&#£ reason for him not to use his bench to try to change the rebounding effort tonight.

If Marvin was not rebounding, why not play Mo more minutes? Yes, he is shorter, but sometimes size is not everything.

And why play JJ for 43 minutes when he is clearly not player well? We were player either with a SF which was not rebounding (Marvin) or with 3 guards… Doesn’t make sense.

And why not try a BIG line up with Collins or even RandMo with Al and Josh??

Anyhow, we must be realistic. Games are lost. It’s a normal occurrence and good teams also have bad games.

Let’s wait that this recent trend does not expand.

little dave

November 29th, 2009
4:32 pm

i watch these games from afar idont av the day to day press etc of the hawks but the more i watch and read about them .woodson lives and dies by jj

cp

November 29th, 2009
4:45 pm

Woodrow complains for years about how he has no bench, finally gets one and still wont utilize it properly. That switching defense was down right disgusting out there. No effort on the glass. We signed a big body for games like this where he could maybe slow down the Pistons but ol Woodrow wont even use him. Teauge is Law Jr. We might win a few more games than last year but this is dang near the same team.

stats don't lie

November 29th, 2009
4:46 pm

Marvin Williams lost this game. His +/- number for this game was -18. That means Detroit outscored the Hawks by 18 with him on the floor, and without him on the floor, the Hawks outscored Detroit by +12. That’s a 30 point differential! That’s horrible!

stats DO lie

November 29th, 2009
4:53 pm

Mark Twain: Figures often beguile me, particularly when I must do the arranging of them myself. In which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.

Marvin cost us the game. Joe cost us the game. Josh’s 3 cost us the game. TYPICAL BLOGGER HADD IT PEGGED.

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
4:54 pm

I THINK BY NOW RICK SUND HAVE 2 REALLY CONSIDER TRADING MARVIN.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
4:55 pm

CAN JOSH PLAY THE 3 POSITION?
GO HAWKS!!!!!

niremetal

November 29th, 2009
5:04 pm

Justin put it best: Why would we want our best help defender – hell, probably the LEAGUE’S best help defender – playing the 3, where he’d spend most of his defensive time on the perimeter?

matt Jones

November 29th, 2009
5:08 pm

Yes he can but not as an outside shooter. Bosh at 5, Horford at 4 Smith at 3, Johnson/Crawford at 2 and Bib at 1. Trade MW, and JJ if they insist to Toronto for Bosh. Or Marv, a 7 footer and 1 round pick for Bosh. We need to do whatever we can to pull that trade off. It is time for Sund to get to work. Woody needs to use the bench or Sund needs to get him off the bench.

Rod from College Park

November 29th, 2009
5:09 pm

Another wonderful effort by our future best player Marvin “Duck” Williams. Where would we be without him?

Ken

November 29th, 2009
5:10 pm

It just fustrating watching this team because they never make ajustments from game to game. JJ didn’t have it last game and again today. Yet he plays over forty minutes. Why does Josh continue to take illadvised shots at critical times in the game. How can you get out rebounded 53 to 27 to a team without two of their starters. These things point to coaching . Why have a much improved bench if you are not going to use them. The Hawks have too many immature starters who feel they are entitled to play whether they are producing or not. Again, this falls upon coach Woodson . Woodson is always saying how the bench players must earn their minutes, well, what about the starters?

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
5:10 pm

CAN WE GET ANDRINS BIEDRINS FROM GOLDEN STATE?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
5:14 pm

GOLDEN STATE NEED A SMALL FORWARD BAD BUT DO THEY THINK HE IS WORTH BRINGING 2 THE TEAM?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

niremetal

November 29th, 2009
5:24 pm

And PS – Marvin’s status as a BYC player makes it pretty much impossible to trade him.

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
5:25 pm

STARTER BIBBY, JOE, JOSH, HORFORD, ANDRIS BIEDRINS.
BENCH TEAGUE, CRAWFORD, MOE, JOE SMITH, ZAZA.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

BONE

November 29th, 2009
5:28 pm

Niremetal the Hawks can trade him after Dec 15

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
5:31 pm

WE ARE HURTING BAD AT THE 3 BUT WE HAVE 2 MOVE HORFORD 2 POWER FORWARD.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!

Mr. Subliminal

November 29th, 2009
5:34 pm

OHMYGODIDIDNOTSEETHISCOMING – ROD IS BLAMING THE LOSS ON MARVIN!!!!!

niremetal

November 29th, 2009
5:34 pm

BONE,

Until December 15, we’re completely barred from trading him because of restrictions on trading away free agents that a team just signed (or re-signed). But BYC rules are a separate set of rules that govern how a player’s salary is computed in trades when he is re-signed by his old team using the Bird exception. BYC rules apply until June 30:
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q73

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
5:38 pm

OUR FRONT COURT JOSH, HORFORD, ANDRIS BIEDRINS WOULD MAKE THE HAWKS THE BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE NBA.
GO HAWKS!!!!!

BONE

November 29th, 2009
5:38 pm

Heres the problem:

Horford needs to be playing in his natural position which is Power Forward. But Josh plays the 4 spot. And Josh is not a true PF and he is too bad of a shooter to play SF. Josh is the definition of a Tweener.

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
5:42 pm

BONE I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU BUT JOSH WILL SHUT DOWN ANY ONE AT THE 3POSITION.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

making your point

November 29th, 2009
5:46 pm

they are dogging the hawks live on internet radio..

http://www.sportsjourney.com

click and listen

BONE

November 29th, 2009
5:52 pm

the hawks deserve to get trashed

Rod from College Park

November 29th, 2009
5:59 pm

Oh its Mr. Subliminal, I mean Nireclown. Great game by Marvin huh. Marvin Williams lost this game. His +/- number for this game was -18. Guess that means nothing huh. Great idea to resign him this summer for more than any other small forward. I wonder who said it was not a good idea. Hmmmmm.

BONE

November 29th, 2009
6:04 pm

If the NBA were a prison then the Hawks would be the prisoners who get passed around constantly

Saint Richt

November 29th, 2009
6:11 pm

Please Joe Johnson leave after this season. Step up and EARN your GD money. You are playing like garbage. No way this team should lose a game like this. GOOD TEAMS win these games. I guess we know that the Hawks aren’t quite there yet. Good job coaching them up Woodson.

Clyde

November 29th, 2009
6:11 pm

When will the madness stop?

FIRE WOODY

what about joe

November 29th, 2009
6:13 pm

Marvin is not the problem, hell he only takes around 8 shots a game…the problem is your “superstar JOE JOHNSON” this dude is not worth what he is asking for…I dont get it, u idiots bash Marvin but Joe Johnson pounds the ball for 18 seconds and throws up brick after brick….HE IS NOT AN SUPERSTAR

BONE

November 29th, 2009
6:26 pm

Marvin is 6 foot 9 and got 2 rebounds. 2 REBOUNDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. HOW IN THE HELL COULD U SAY MARVIN IS NOT THE PROBLEM. HE’S NOT THE ONLY PROBLEM BUT HE IS A PROBLEM.

THE 3 PROBLEMS OF THIS TEAM: 1)JOE 2)MARVIN 3)WOODY’S TERRIBLE COACHING

Rod from College Park

November 29th, 2009
6:31 pm

what about joe,

Because us idiots realize that Joe steps up 90% up the time, and Marvin never steps up.

nunna yo buzinezz

November 29th, 2009
7:12 pm

woodson has got to go..

Najeh Davenpoop

November 29th, 2009
7:52 pm

Why the hell does the NBA schedule games on Sunday afternoons during NFL season? I realize this game was in Detroit, and not only had the Lions already played but even if they were playing today nobody in Detroit would be watching them, but I’d be surprised if even half the regular viewership was watching this game in the metro ATL area.

As for the game, it sucked. Josh Smith is the only guy who came to play, and even he didn’t play particularly well. That’s now 4 straight games where the Hawks have played like the 37-45 team that squeaked into the playoffs in 2007, instead of the supposed-to-be contender of 2009-10. They need to get this fixed quick.

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
8:08 pm

Wow, reading the blog now from last year is like night and day. Now, most of the blog realizes how horrible and inconsistent Marvin is. I promise you, he has one other game like the Houston game under his belt for the rest of the season and that’s it. This was the perfect game for him to step up. He was outplayed by Villanueva, and Jerebko. Villanueva I can understand but Jerebko? This is what I’ve been saying, this guy is GARBAGE. +/- stats for Marvin, Marvin -18? ARE YOU F….KING SERIOUS?????? CUT THIS DUDE IMMEDIATELY PLEASE!!!!!!

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
8:10 pm

For those who don’t understand, +/- is team net points while player is in the game. Meaning when Marvin was playing, Detroit was 18 points better than us. GET RID OF THIS CLOWN!!!

dub366

November 29th, 2009
8:36 pm

This is not the Atlanta Hawks Basketball Team, it’s the Joe Johnson & Woody Show. No matter what Joe does; missing shots or turnovers, he doesn’t come out of the game until he has gotten the team so far behind, the team cannot come back, with all the ball hogging and everything. I’m just tired of looking at this mess; also there is no ball movement.

dub366

November 29th, 2009
8:44 pm

HOW CAN MARVIN SETPUP WHEN HE CAN’T GET HIS HANDS ON THE BALL ,BECAUSE OF JOE
HOGGING THE BALL. DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN JOE WAS OUT WHO LED THE TEAM IN SCORING IT WAS MARVIN. JOE AND WOODY NEED TO GO.

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
8:51 pm

WOODSON SHOULD NOT GET AN EXTENSION

TALKS ABOUT USING BENCH BUT DOESNT.

IDIOT. USE THE BENCH U MORON. WHY DID U SIGN JASON COLLINS?

The Mind of Sanity the trilogy

November 29th, 2009
8:59 pm

A broken record

Same problem, same answer,

The Mind of Sanity

If you did not want to sound twisted you would compare head coaches to head coaches. Let me help you with a better example.

Woodson is to over achieving what Mark Richt is to underachieving.
I hope that help’s. Woodson is responsible for the Hawks fortunes, not his assistant coaches. Mark Richt is responsible for the Dogs fortunes, or the lack thereof, not his assistant coaches. Ill bet you buck a lot of responsibility at work….You do have a job dont you ?

Its amazing how far this center-less team has come. What I cant understand is how we can call Sund a general manager when he has not and will not address our # 1 deficiency, no center to compete at the higher levels.

N.J. is 0-16 and is going nowhere. They have a 7 foot center who has skills, size and weight. Hes polished and can compete with Howard or Oneal. Hes currently averaging 17.9points and 9 rebounds per game. GO GET THIS GUY LOPEZ!! WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY PAYING SUND FOR? YOU GET LOPEZ AND KEEP THE NUCLEUS TOGETHER AND WE ARE IN THE TOP THREE AND READY TO K.S.A.!!

FIRE SUND IF HE CANT GET THIS DONE. 0-16? OH YEAH LOPEZ CAN BE GOT!

what about joe

November 29th, 2009
9:09 pm

Rod from College Park,
If your ‘SUPERSTAR’ would swing the damn ball instead of pounding the ball for 18 seconds maybe Marvin would average more points….This is supposed to be Joe Johnson’s team not Marvin’s…Joe Johnson is not a superstar and his stats are inflated because he has the ball all game..and jacks up shots..Everyone except you people who be on this blog know that if joe johnson is your best player you will not be an elite team…Joe Johnson really isnt a 2 guard, he is a small foward, thats y elite 2 guards eat his lunch every time.thats y he cannot blow past defenders, and it takes him 2 hours to get to the basket..if he was an superstar dont you think Phoenix would have signed him back.TEAMS DONT TRADE SUPERSTARS…And to add insult to injury, Woodson is the damn coach!

what about joe

November 29th, 2009
9:11 pm

rod from college park,

Who makes the most money on the Hawks?

Who makes the most money on the Hawks

November 29th, 2009
9:21 pm

Sund sorry Azz

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
9:48 pm

MIND OF SANITY I LIKE LOPEZ 2 BUT IT WOULD TAKE MORE THAN MARVIN 2 BRING HIM HERE WHO WOULD YOU GIVE UP FOR LOPEZ?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
9:51 pm

Im sorry guys but the more i watch marvin play the more i shake my head.
GO HAWKS!!!!!

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
9:52 pm

I say trade him now while he has a little value.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
10:05 pm

dub366, are you on crack? Marvin lead the team in scoring when Joe was out? That was like 2 games you idiot, and that was last year without Jamal Crawford and against the Timberwolves and Bobcats….Before you come on here talking ignorant, bring something more than that. Marvin is a bum..

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
10:11 pm

WOW I JUST REALIZE THAT WOODY DIDNT PLAY HIS BENCH AT ALL.
JOE 4 MIN
MOE 5 MIN
ZAZA 10 MIN
TEAGUE 0 MIN
WHAT IN THE H IS GOING ON HERE.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
10:11 pm

what about joe,

If you play basketball, there is a small rule to understand. It is called “KYP”….know your personnel. I’d rather Joe Johnson shoot with 3 people on him than to have Marvin shoot. I like my percentages better. Ok so Joe had an off game. An off game for Marvin is not an off game, he’s always average at best. I’m glad Marvin is not our superstar, we would really be in trouble. Last year I said we should trade Marvin and sign Petrius (sp?). We would look so much better with him and he’s being paid about the same if not less. It’s embarassing.

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
10:13 pm

WHAT IS ALL THIS FUST ABOUT SIGNING JOE SMITH THIS SUMMER AND WOODY WANT PLAY HIM CLYDE WHERE IS MY T SHIRT.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Ken Strickland

November 29th, 2009
10:15 pm

Is there anyone out there who still thinks HC MWoodson is coaching like someone who deserves COY? He’s completely reverted back to all of the things every knowledgable Hawks fan has complained about the last few yrs and has forced the team to do likewise. We’re now seeing him revert to over utilization of his starters, under utilization of his bench, ignoring the development of his young PG, forcing or permitting his guards to take over the OFF and reduce it to ISO’s and jumpshooting and using little to no strategy or adjustments.

He’s stopped even trying to coach, teach or utilize any form of strategy and has simply shortened his rotation to 6-7 preferred veterans and lets them decide what happens. If they’re not too tired, and are hitting their jumpers, we win. If not, we lose. I was really hoping he would stick to what was working so well when we were dominant the 1st part of the season. When we started the season, we were playing fast, attacking the basket, passing the ball inside, playing inside out and getting lots of easy fastbreak baskets. We’re doing none of that now.

As the HC of a team that was leading the NBA in wins, fastbreak pts, pts in the paint, near the top in scoring, rebounding, blocked shots and FT attempts and percentage, Woodson has taken this team backwards.
ROD FROM CP, the team accomplished all of these things with Marvin playing poorly and having all of the perceived shortcomings you’re always harping on. Before you utter another ignorant comment about Marvin, check out these stats over the last 4gms.

JJohnson—-FTA/FGM PTS MINS
5-19 10 43:12
6-18 14 42:17
3-8 9 29:45(early foul trouble)
9-21 22 41:53

MWilliams—8-16 17 35:28
3-7 7 28:13
1-4 4 30:31
3-8 9 27:28

You are so blinded by your hatred for MWilliams you’re too blind to realize what’s right before your eyes. JJ has taken 31 more shots than Marvin(66-35), but has scored only 18 more points(55pts-37pts). You can’t see the forest for the trees.

IS IT REALLY GOOD COACHING TO PLAY YOUR KEY PLAYER 40+ MPG AND ALLOW HIM TO DOMINATE THE OFF WHEN HE’S CONSISTENTLY PLAYING SO POORLY, ESPECIALLY THIS EARLY IN THE SEASON? This team has carried Woodson, and when the team isn’t playing well, Woodson becomes a nonfactor, maybe even a liability. At least we know his earlier excuses for not using his bench,like not having a deep, talented and/or veteran bench was just that, A SORRY A$$ EXCUSE. We also know his excuses for not playing ALaw, like his limited jumpshooting, was a bunch of BS. Wouldn’t you say ALaw’s jumpshot was no worse than Teagues, maybe better, yet Woodson made the decision to draft PG JTeague knowing his outside shooting limitations.

FIRE WOODY!!!!!!!!!!!!

RLP

November 29th, 2009
10:18 pm

There are five teams in the East with a winning record on the road. One of them is the Hawks. There are six teams in the West with a winning record on the road. Why does everyone here get so down on this team because it loses a game on the road yet has a winning road record? The Hawks were still in reach of a victory in spite of how badly they played until the last few minutes of the game. Is there no one else on this blog who appreciates how well this team is playing? It is easy to be negative when they lose a game. But they are playing other teams that are also filled with professional athletes. Come on guys. Your negativity is just a bit too much. Last year this team won only 16 road games all year. They have already won five this year. It is not easy to win on the road. Cut this team some slack.

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
10:20 pm

JOE JOHNSON 43 MIN 5-19 WHAT IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
10:22 pm

Ken Strickland,

So what you are saying is, let’s give Marvin more shots than Joe Johnson and our team would be better? Are you out of your mind you idiot? Why would I want Marvin shooting more shots or driving to the hole with those ugly flailing bulls..t attempts at lay-ups? Dude, quit writing novels and bringing these bs stats proving absolutely nothing. Marvin is a bum. What you are saying is you believe Marvin would score if given the same chances as Joe, and I say no f…king way….

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
10:31 pm

Ken i allways agree with you but on this one i have 2 disagree, marvin game have gotten worse and he has no balance when playing, im sorry but we have to get somthing for him before 2 late.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

JeJe

November 29th, 2009
10:33 pm

ITS NOT EVEN ABOUT USING MO, TEAGUE, AND ZAZA MORE

THE GUY REFUSES TO USE JASON COLLINS, WHO IS FREAKING GIGANTIC. THE GUY STARTED IN THE FINALS AGAINST SHAQ AND DUNCAN 2 YEARS IN A ROW. WHY THE HELL DID WE SIGN HIM?

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
10:33 pm

RLP, you’re right. However, we should not lose to the Detroit Pistons playing without Rip, Tayshaun Prince and Ben Gordon. The problem lies in the one weakness we have. I am glad we are doing great this year. Get rid of the obvious weak link and we would be even more unstoppable. I want our team to be better, because to win a championship, we won’t win with the weak link. We need to make a move.

rms

November 29th, 2009
10:51 pm

NO RLP, no one like Woodson style of coaching. Its pretty obvious that if the Hawks perimeter guys like Bibby or Joe and such are hitting their jumpshots then we win and everybody is happy and Mike Woodson looks like a genius. If we are missing jumpshots then we lose because we have no offensive scheme we dont rebound well on a consistent basis and we dont use our post guys (the few we have) to score down low. Woodson may be a good coach but I dont think he fits this team the way it is constructed. The Hawks are more of a transition-run and attack type team. We dont really have the right guys to run a consistent half-court game like so other teams are. Plus in my opinion guys like Marvin and Josh have low basketball IQ. They really need to study the game and define their position as to what they do well and play to that instead of whatever they call themselves doing now.

darrell starks

November 29th, 2009
10:52 pm

JEJE I DONT NO WHATS GOING ON WITH WOODY YOU ARE RIGHT JASON COLLIN IS BIG WITH EXPERIENCE BUT YET WOODY WANT PLAY HIM.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Sam/Rod from College Park in da Swats

November 29th, 2009
10:56 pm

MARVIN IS THE REASON THE HAWKS LOST TODAY.

MARVIN IS THE REASON BEN WALLACE AND JASON MAXIELL GOT 15 OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS AND WHY JOSH LET JEREBKO GET TWO STRAIGHT OFFENSIVE REBOUNDS RIGHT NEXT TO HIM.

MARVIN IS THE REASON THAT JOE JOHNSON SHOT 5 FOR 19.

MARVIN IS THE REASON MIKE WOODSON DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO USE HIS BENCH.

MARVIN KEPT ME FROM WALKING ONTO THE TEAM AT UNC.

MARVIN USED THE LAST SQUARE OF TOILET PAPER.

MY DAD COULD BEAT UP MARVIN’S DAD.

MARVIN IS THE REASON WE ARE HAVING GLOBAL WARMING.

Sam from da Swats

November 29th, 2009
11:01 pm

Dude go to bed…

Mr. Lau

November 29th, 2009
11:18 pm

This team is winning inspite of Woodson. He is a good coach, but not the one the hawks need. We need a coach that can identify the strengths of this team and maximize them. Woodson’s lack of creativeness is crippling them.

Maybe if Marvin comes from the bench in the 2nd unit as a 2nd shooting option he could wake up. I hope he wakes up, but not bettting on it.

Grandad

November 29th, 2009
11:29 pm

S.f.d.S. – Give it a break with Marv. I do not care what his +/- was. Joe was only -1 but you cannot tell me he was not a bigger factor in the game. Also who was responsible for blocking out Wallace? The game was probably decided by a lack of blocking out. Oh, by the way, Joe had only two rebs. A players +/- does noy take into acct. with whom he is on the floor. No matter what… there was always 4 other teammates on the floor with him @ all times[MW]. Teague had a 0 +/- which means he almost contributed as much as Joe and he didn’t even play.

Enough of that nonsense – Bone, blogger of the day!

It’s only been 5/10/15/now what 17 ? After ea.benchmark folks would say it’s only been ____ games, give him time, wait and see. When can we say
that this yr. is more of the same ol’ same ol’ [Mr.Woodson] ?

Nire – I really believe Josh would be an asset @ the 3. 1st of all defensively he would not always have to be assigned a 3. secondly-Beidrins is a pretty good shot blcker himself. Josh could still chase down players and block from behind. One of the more marvelous [hustle] traits he has. plus I think he would be a monster defender @ the 3 much like Artest. 3’s don’t always have to be great shooters, think C.Butler.

Whomever thought of Biedrins; what a marvelous idea. Nire seemed to know the ins & outs of trade restrictions, but if there was a way, then by all means please someone explore that option. Perfect fit.
*[darrell starks]*

K.S. – As always, well said and glad your back safely.

Clyde – You’re the man !
Has Mr. Woodson lost the locker room?

For the poster who criticized R.Sund /hold on now/ the man has tried to give Mr.W. the tools he asked for. I have confidence that he will make calculated and intelligent decisions.

Grandad

November 29th, 2009
11:48 pm

kellZ: I second that motion.

Grandad

November 29th, 2009
11:50 pm

kellZ! – sorry!

cp

November 29th, 2009
11:56 pm

Still cant made adjustments, still no plan B when plan A does not work, still wont use the bench, still rides the starters even when they are stinking up the joint and giving no effort, still allows Joe to pound the rock and take as many bad shots as he wants, still with the switching defense even if it does not work…. How much longer do we have to put up with this crap. New year same dang complaints.

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
12:00 am

SAM FROM DA SWATS-allow me to show you what a true idiot is. However, don’t stand in front of a mirror or you’ll spoil the surprise. First of all, I want you to reprint any portion of my last comment that in any way advocated giving Marvin, or anyone else, more shots. REMEMBER, READING AND READING COMPREHENSION ARE FUNDAMENTAL.

However, if you’re actually capable of reading and analyzing the stats I presented on JJ and Marvin over the last 4gms, you’d see where it might not be such a bad idea. Marvin has certainly been far more efficient with his shots than JJ. If Marvin took those additional 31 shots, he’d have to shoot just 29%(he’s currently shooting 441%), which doesn’t factor in any 3pt shots(323%) or FT’s(875%), to equal the total number of pts JJ has scored over the last 4gms(31 shots x .29%=8.99shots x 2pts=17.98pts). ONLY A TRUE IDIOT LIKE YOU WOULD BE IGNORANT ENOUGH TO IGNORE THESE STATS SIMPLY BECAUSE OF SOME STUPID PERSONAL ISSUES WITH MARVIN.

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
12:33 am

DARRELL STARKS-you’re correct, Marvin’s gm has gotten worse. But that’s exactly the point I’m trying to make. Although his gm has gotten worse, as our #5 scoring option, he’s still managed to score only 18 fewer pts over the last 4gms than JJ, our #1 scoring option, while taking 31 fewer shots. The best way to get Marvin going is through OFF inclusion, not exclusion.

Marvin is having problems, but he’s not THE problem. Instead of getting rid of him, or any player, the Hawks need to get rid of:

(1)Woodson’s limited, perimeter oriented, jumpshooting, guard dominated halfcourt ISO OFF and constantly switching DEF.

(2)His unwillingness to effectively utilize his bench.

(3)His overplaying of key players.

(4)His pretence at trying to develop young players.

(5)His constant habit of lying and blaming everything that goes wrong on his players.

WE CAN KILL ALL OF THOSE BIRDS WITH ONE STONE BY GETTING RID OF WOODSON, PERIOD.

GRANDAD-Thanks for the compliment and the concern. I hope everyone had a holiday as rewarding and as safe as mine.

rusty

November 30th, 2009
12:54 am

any one in the nba can consistantly block marvins shots.he becomes very small when he goes up on his drives. i have never seen an nba player as weak & clumsy. the only reason he gets fouled so much is that he falls into everybody. i have hearing for the last 4 seasons
everybody talking about all star joe, i think every one is crazy. he is slow as crap,is a big ballhog,screws up our ball movement & is worthless on defense.woody is afraid to take him out of a game. zaza & moe really stink. woody is the worst coach in the nba,runs a lousy switching defense & has not a clue how to run an offense. any improvement we have made as a team has nothing to do with woodson.

Crashing the Glass

November 30th, 2009
1:36 am

The ressurection of Ben Wallace, plus Boston over Miami-

http://crashingtheglass.com/

RealSquawk

November 30th, 2009
1:41 am

MArvin played less then thirty minutes in this game so I doubt he is to blame. I also didn’t see the whole game.

I have a tendency to stop watching no matter the quarter when Woodson’s remedy for a bad Joe night is to run him into a iso so it can be five on one.

Josh and Al I wouldn’t blame you if you decided not to show up for a game. nobody keeps there guys out of the lane and nobody boxes out and then you get blamed for a poor effort.

@kenstrickland- you are probably right, but it took an 0-16 start for New Jersey to fire Frank. I don’t see Woody going anywhere anytime soon.

Rod from College Park

November 30th, 2009
2:07 am

Ken Strickland,

You become more idiotic the more you post. Joe took more shots because he should, he can and he is able to create his own shot. These are things that Marvin can’t do. Marvin would not shoot 31 times if his life depended on it. Oh, I remember your famous line, Marvin is as good as Danny Granger. Idiot. Stop trying to blame Woodson for everything, and blame the bum, your cousin, or son Marvin Williams .

honest_abe

November 30th, 2009
2:44 am

marvin will never be a superstar. he is also limited offensively. but the hawks don’t do a good job utilizing his strengths. which is a nice mid range jumper… why not try to get him involved earlier in the game by running some plays for him off screens? the entire jj and bibby pounding the ball and than hoisting up long jump shots makes marvin seem even more useless.

SWATS30311

November 30th, 2009
2:48 am

One thing that stands out about JJ’s game is the fact that he chucks up a LOT of jump shots! At 6′7″ 240, he should be driving to the basket, getting contact, and earning free points on the FT line. I did a stat check on the NBA’s Elite (Kobe, LeBron, D Wade, etc.) amd discovered the JJ is only averaging 4.4 FT attempts a game. Most of the “NBA Elite” are averaging 9 FT attempts a game, and I was shocked to see that Kevin Durant averages over 9 FT attempts a game. The stats don’t lie…..if JJ would stop being strictly a jump shooter, drive in the paint and get to the FT line, like the NBA elite do masterfully, his game would be a lot better. He walked away from 60 big ones this off season, and his body language suggests that he doesn’t want to be here. If he wants to be reunited with D’Antoni in NYC, let him. But he, nor D’Antoni have Steve Nash, who has made them a lot of money….D’Antoni by running his syatem to perfection, and JJ by allowing him to look like an awesome player by average 17 pts as a 4th option. But anyway, that’s another story for another day. Bottom line: JJ is not being the leader of this team…I think he is hating on Crawford. Before, when we wanted him to shoot, he refused….now that Crawford here, he wants to all the shots.

Woody, I think, is done…..regardless of what the team does this season. He is totally inept, and isn’t worthy of a extension….AT ALL!

And Marvin……he is the epitome of BUST! PERIOD!

WTF

November 30th, 2009
3:36 am

NO MATTER WHAT YALL SAY JOE JOHNSON IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE, CAUSE TWO BAD GAMES YALL GOING NUTS, EVERYBODY GOES THROUGH SLUMPS< U EVEN WE GO THROUGH SLUMPS LIVING DUMB ASS PEOPLE< I KNO YALL DIDNT THINK IT WAS GONNA BE A PERFECT SEASON <<<<PLEASE!!!! OVER TWO BAD GAMES YALL TALKING BOUT TRADES, HES THE REASON WE MADE IT THIS FAR DID YALL FORGET< ITS NOT HIS FAULT NOBODY DIDNT STEP UP!!!! CAUSE CRAWFORD AND JOSH SCORED 20pts THAT DONT MEAN A THING THREY STILL LOST!!!

vava74

November 30th, 2009
3:50 am

Denver just lost at home against MIN and are currently standing @ 12-5 with Billups the all-star laying an egg.

I am sure that the Nuggets fans are complaining like hell.

In case you have not noticed, games are lost, teams, players and coaches lay eggs all the time.

We have seen good showings, reasonable showings and bad showings. IT HAPPENS.

Right now we are 12-5 which is still a very good record.

Before we round up the tar and feathers, let’s wait and see what happens.

JJ had a string of bad games. My guess is that he has mental issues about Crawford’s emergence but I am confident that he will adapt.

Marvin is playing bad, however, he is the player who has suffered more with Crawford’s arrival since he is not getting shots and is the first player out of the line up, regardless of him being playing well or not.

Hence, we are still making adjustments and we all know that Woody is very conservative making them.

We are neither winning in spite of him and nor winning exclusively on account of his coaching. It’s a collective effort which has had good and bad performances from ALL sides.

Right now, I feel that Woody has not performed well during the past games, however, I cannot repeat this enough times:

The game against ORL was completely ruined in the 3rd quarter by the refs by continuing to allow Howard to get away with elbow charges and by swallowing the whistle in at least 3 consecutive JJ DRIVES (not jump shots).

The PHI game was bad but we won on the road where we have a 5-4 record right now.

Yesterday was clearly a bad game, however, the rebounding difference was – apart from the effort – also a freak occurrence, just like a hurricane or a flood: a disaster that sometimes is not controllable, just like our shots were simply not falling against NO.

Clyde

November 30th, 2009
7:56 am

WE CAN KILL ALL OF THOSE BIRDS WITH ONE STONE BY GETTING RID OF WOODSON, PERIOD.

-Ken Strickland

Boy

November 30th, 2009
8:17 am

I think Joe wants to be traded. He refused to resign and now he is tanking. Give him his wish before he draggs us down.

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
8:22 am

Rod from College Park , bro, dont waste your time trying to address haters that have a preconceived agenda. I can only stomach so much of bubba crew members. Its kinda like eating beets. No offense to people who eat beets. Its just disgusting. These few loud willfully ignorant bloggers are a turn off to this sight. I dont even read their nag whine and b!tch posts. I saw that you made comment in your November 30th, 2009
2:07 am post, and I already knew that you had an unpleasant experience in reading a sick blog. There is no cure for their sickness, haterites, Is kind of like leprosy of the heart. You can tell the symptoms whether they have an advance case or not. The guy who’s blog you read has the most advance case of haterities since Hitler.

Any way I saw you reaching out trying to help him by showing him how idiotic he was, but you are wasting your time. There is no cure and if you are not careful it can be contagious. I carry three silver bullets….Just in case.- peace out.

Hawks Need a center

November 30th, 2009
8:30 am

Hawks wouldnt be having any problems if they had a legit center. Why are you wasting perfectly good blogs on garbage and idiotic statements. How many teams you know who were in the finals last year that had no legit center? 0, what about the year before?0, before that?0……nt
0 zero, nil, nada, ziltch. thats how many teams are going to win a championship with out a center. So why in the HELL are you idiots arguing about who took the most shots or played the most minutes? Get a clue biitches. None of the Shyt matters. You aint going past the second round hoes. Are you guys really this stupid or are you acting?…never mind dont answer.

A snapshot of a brain on drugs

November 30th, 2009
8:32 am

Clyde

November 30th, 2009
7:56 am

WE CAN KILL ALL OF THOSE BIRDS WITH ONE STONE BY GETTING RID OF WOODSON, PERIOD.

-Ken Strickland

Fundamentals

November 30th, 2009
9:04 am

No interior D, no rebounding, no effort = no chance of a win! Our loss tonight was effort. A perfect situation to put in Randmo, ZaZa, Marvin, Crawford and Teague in at the same time. Maybe then Marvin would feel like he was part of the offense and team. You can’t get in the flow if you never get shots.

We’ve gotta have the balls to sit Joe when he’s obviously not in the building. I’m convinced we need to move Marvin to the second unit where he can develop. You can’t tell me Randmo and Teague wouldn’t have given monster energy & effort if given a chance yesterday. Nobody cared, nobody had heart. This has been going on for about 5 games now…plus 1/2 of last year. The guys just aren’t mature enough to bring it every night and Woodson is too worried about his job to trust his bench.

He needs to learn to sit starters when they obviously don’t have it on a particular night and to rely on his bench. They can’t develop if they never see the court. I’m first to say he deserves a chance, but he may not deserve an extension if he can’t figure this point out.

Marvin can never succeed when he’s 5th option. He needs to move to the 2nd unit if we ever want to see him succeed.

Mike is Back

November 30th, 2009
9:34 am

Great stuff as always,
Catching up on the blogs is always a great time for me. Man guys crack me UP!!. I didn’t see the game…but just reading the sound bites from blog tells me it wasn’t our finest hour. lol

I been trying to help urge on THE BIRDS!!!!! They can’t afford lose these games at the dome. After the game I went to check on the Hawks score…I was totally shock at the out come. BUT OVERALL I’M BULLISH ON THE COACH AND THE TEAM!!!

GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
9:43 am

Woody said he was embarrassed by the Hawks performance in Detroit. Wtf? Hell, I’m embarrased everytime he calls a freakin Iso Joe. lol!! But seriously, I think Josh Smith is the new “Hawks best player”. The media still gives that honor to JJ. To be honest, JJ might not even be the best shooting guard on the team anymore.

Rod from College Park

November 30th, 2009
10:01 am

Truth-Serum,

You are right. It’s very hard to battle the Bubba Crew, but someone has to do it. Maybe we should join forces.

Dap01

November 30th, 2009
10:16 am

Pound, Pound, Pound. Blank stare, Blank stare, Blank stare. Joe, Joe, Joe. Woody, Woody, Woody.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
10:20 am

Vava- I like your post. I think it is the time to keep our cool. The season is a marathon, not a sprint. At 12-4 we are still on pace to win 60 games, which is honestly a lot better than I thought we would do. I totally agree that the Detroit loss was a total “lack of effort” game, and the kind of game that really legit teams don’t have often. The Hawks are still building towards legitimacy, so they cannot afford those games the way say and LA, San Antonio or Boston can.

I am looking for this team to go 3-1 over the next 4 games. If after 20 games, we are 15-5, I will be satisified.

I will start really looking at playing rotations and player performance between games 20-30, that is about the point I expect this team to be hitting it’s stride.

BTW- Hawks need a center only two teams are in the NBA finals, every year. Also, is Kendrick Perkins a legit NBA center, more so than Al?
Before you attack a whole group of NBA fans, you would do well to know (even remotely) what you are talking about.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
10:26 am

Fundamentals- “nobody cared, nobody had heart”- You summed it up perfectly, really what other analysis of the Detroit game is there.

However, I can tell you that Randmo and Teague may have not given monster energy, because I just did. I agree that particularly in the 3rd quarter why not give them a shot, if for nothing else to send a message to the starters that no one’s minutes are safe without effort.
RandMo has entire career from college to the pro’s of NEVER giving monster energy. Just sayin’

Peter

November 30th, 2009
10:38 am

Well I agree with those that think Marvin is a disaster…..not only have we NOT found a true Point that can make a difference………Keeping Marvin around is silly. I saw him at a Pet’s mart, and I thought……Gee does this guy even lift weights ?

For a 6′ 9″ guy he cannot jump to save his life, and is so soft on the boards, and around the rim it is pitiful to watch…….Can anyone tell me what his Biggest rebounding game was this year ? How about ever ?

When he takes the ball to the rim, he is constantly blocked or fouled, but can’t finish off the shot, and create a 3 point play.

I think he and JJ should be traded……they gave Joe the opportunity to resign, but he refused…..so the writings on the wall. I think he believes the team will go later in the playoffs, and so he will get an even bigger deal than he has.

JJ is all about me at this point, why not trade him and Marvin for a Big, and a point.

Woody, well I have called for him to go, and I still feel he cannot take the team to the next level, watching the O makes me think that. Getting rid of JJ will mean the ball and the team can move on O, and perhaps we can have a real chance come playoff time.

honest_abe

November 30th, 2009
10:47 am

not saying that al can’t man the five. but al is a natural powerforward. while kendrick is a natural center. kendrick perkins is a legit center because of his physicality and toughness in the paint. he’s too strong to push around down low and he always manages to get into other players heads by giving hard fouls. it’s his presence not his size that makes him a true center. doesn’t hurt that he outweighs al by 35 lbs either.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
10:52 am

Peter- So let’s see, team is on pace to win 55-60 games, probably be very competitive in top three in the conference, and you want to trade JJ and Marvin? For whom exactly? Some imaginary center and a point guard? C’mon man at least keep your discussion somewhat in the real world.

Fundamentals

November 30th, 2009
10:52 am

Teague is going to give the effort regardless. I can admit Randmo has been an awful dissappointment up until his last game…or first game of this season. He was banging folks, getting boards and I think he hit every shot he took. Not bad for a man who knows McDonalds is his next option after this year is out. His back’s against the wall this year. I think he’s going to give what he’s got…whatever that may be. Granted I’ll admit we’ll be hunting kids to fill in slots for 3 big men when they leave after this year. That is unless Collins likes his courtside, I never get to play, seat.

With the lack of effort Sunday from the kids that played I would’ve cleared the bench before 1/2 time and made a statement. Our scrubs could’ve gone down 14 and then let the starters wake up and fix it. Didn’t they learn anything from the whoopin Orlando put on us in the second 1/2? I was praying that was what we would do.

At least it wasn’t another national broadcast where they’d blame it on Turkey.

TOTAL LACK OF EFFORT, HEART & TESTICLES!

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
11:11 am

Ken-
I would love for you to ask Woodson something like this… “It appears that this team has played with a lack of focus, energy and effort after the Houston game. What do you attribute this to? and If you have noticed the same things, then is discipline involved in changing this pattern? Will playing time be reflected in effort?”

kwooden1

November 30th, 2009
11:55 am

Didn’t see last nights game, but from reading the blog it sounded like a disaster. From the stats it still looks like Woody is coaching like he’s got a team full of rookies. He keeps letting his starters work through their mistakes instead of putting them on the bench. What I saw in the Orlando game was Woody watching Zaza get abused down low and JJ hold the ball! Woody needs to take JJ out and remind him to pass the ball! Put Zaza on the bench and use Smith or Collins. Woody’s view has always been my starters are my best players (Crawford is basically at starter) and I will win with my best players on the floor. That’s true until your best players aren’t playing like your best players. If their not playing then put someone else in and see if they will preform. My problem from looking at the stat sheet was, Wallace only shot 4 FTs! If he’s dominating the boards, then start fouling him, he’s a terrible shooter! Send Collins in to do it, do something.

I’m not a Woody supporter, but I do want the team to succeed! Overall I think Woody is doing a decent job. Even if he was doing a great job, I think they would probably only have 1-2 more wins.

Woody, start coaching like you expect to win games by 20+!!

If guys aren’t giving effort, then let them sit!

If they aren’t doing what they are supposed to,
take them out!,
straighten them out!
and put them back in!

GO HAWKS!!

JeJe

November 30th, 2009
12:23 pm

FIRE WOODSON FOR NOT USING THE BENCH.

HE JUST WANTS TO WIN 50 WITH HIS STARTERS AND JCRAW PLAYING 35+ OR WHATEVER. MAYBE A LITTLE ZAZA

THIS IS A JOKE. HE IS JUST COACHING FOR A NEW CONTRACT SO HE’LL BURN OUT THE STARTERS

FIRE WOODSON

TRADE MARVIN. USELESS PLAYER. THE GUY SCORES 9 POINTS AND PPL ACT LIKE HE’S HAD A GOOD GAME. IDIOTS

AND CAN AJC PLZ MUSTER UP THE MONEY FOR A BEAT WRITER. WTF IS THIS GARBAGE? WE DON’T EVEN GET REAL BLOG TITLES, THE BLOGS TAKE 30 SECONDS TO WRITE, AND THE GUY DOESN’T EVEN GO TO THE GAMES. LOL

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
12:27 pm

Fundamentals & honest_abe:
Great insights.*Marvin-moving w/o ball is his strength. He is not a slasher! *Perkins weighs in @ about 285, that make him a bit more of a [5] than Al(on a diet). Plus Hubie said K.P. looked to be a legit 6-10.

Daniel: To answer your question > Biedrins.

*Lakers did not win a championship until Gasol arrived.

* Did anyone notice; Joe had ‘0′,(ZERO), NO free throws Sun.? He did
not get to the line one time.

*I know a fella named Bubba who is an engineer. Not the kind who drives
a train either. I would bet a nickel that he doesn’t even know who MW
is nor does he care. This whole paragraph is totally irrelevant, is it
not?

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
12:34 pm

Grandad- please clarify

RLP

November 30th, 2009
12:38 pm

vava74

I agree with your post. This team is better than most. In the NBA teams will have ups and downs. It was nice when the national media recognized the team’s improvement and placed them atop the rankings. Obviously this week will drop them down but they will still be in the top ten. Hollinger and Mark Stein both have them at number five at ESPN. Both have them ranked higher than the Celtics. Most people on this blog seem to want the number six scorer to be averaging 20 points per game. It amazes me when trades are suggested that would have another team give up their best or next to best player for someone they feel is worthless. I do not think these people live in the real world.

Six of the nest eight games are at home. All are winnable games. Two are away against Dallas and Toronto. If the Hawks can win the six home games and split the two away games then they will be in good shape for the next six games which will include a four game road trip and then home and way against Cleveland.

So much in the NBA is about a team’s psyche. If the team can come out of the next eight games with a 7 and 1 record then when they do go on that road trip maybe they can maintain the .500 record they need to have to keep them on the cusp of being the elite team everybody on this blog wants them to be. The four road games are against Chicago, Minnesota, Denver and Indiana. If they play with energy and abandonment I think it is possible for them to win three of the four. But even winning two of four would allow them to enter the new year with a record of 21-10 which translate to a 677 winning percentage even if they lose both games to Cleveland to finish out the year. I think this is a realistic goal for the team and for us fans. As we all know predicting the future is not the same as what the future will produce. There will be games that are lost that should not be lost. But maybe there will also be unanticipated wins. But how many on this blog would not be satisfied with a 21-10 record entering 2010? And how many disagree with this possibility? So let us start with Toronto on tonight and the Knicks on Wednesday. Go Hawks.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
12:40 pm

For what it is worth: ESPN’s awards leader board has Joe Johnson in 6th place for MVP, Crawford #1 as sixth man, Josh Smith is #1 Defensive Player of the Year, and Mike Woodson, #2 in Coach of the Year.

that is not me saying it.

Clyde

November 30th, 2009
12:42 pm

WOODY = COY

MY AZ

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
12:45 pm

RLP- that was a great post.
I would be totally happy with 21-10; however, it is the way we lose those games that really matters to me. Last year we had WAY too many blow out losses. The Detroit loss hurt, because we got beat by not trying hard enough, but it wasn’t a blow out. The Orlando game was a real crusher, I can take 5 more losses over the next 15 games, but not blow outs.

JeJe

November 30th, 2009
12:52 pm

By Trey Daniels

After almost 6 years on the job, and despite 100 more L’s than W’s on his record, Hawks head coach Mike Woodson feels he is finally getting somewhere with his young team.

“I am starting to get it. I am still working on some things, but I think I finally have the basics down,” said Woodson. “Whoever has the most points at the end of the game wins. Once I figured that one out, the rest of it just started falling in place.”

Woodson said he once thought basketball was like golf, where the lower score wins.

“That totally changed the way I approached the game,” said Woodson.

He said he also recently figured out the 3-point line, back court violations and rebounding. Woodson, who has faced rumors of being fired, said he should keep his job.

“I figure it can only get better. Now I can tell our players, ‘Hey, we need 3 points, shoot from over here.’ And it’s actually OK if you miss the shot, you can run to the ball and get it back,” said Woodson. “These are things I can pass on to our players and it should lead to a few wins.”

When asked what he knew about defense, Woodson seemed puzzled.

“You mean it is OK to try to stop the other team? Wow!”

Woodson, who was an assistant coach for the Detroit Pistons before coming to Atlanta, admitted he mostly rode the bench while Larry Brown did most of the work.

“Larry was great,” said Woodson. “He could tell players what a travel is. He could even explain a bounce pass to them. That is part of the reason Detroit was so good.”

Woodson said Brown allowed him to do vital things for him, like hold his clip board and hand Gatorade to players on the bench. The Atlanta coach said he rarely paid attention to the game saying he always found it “a little boring.”

General Manager Rick Sund, a self-proclaimed ‘basketball expert,’ said he didn’t realize Woodson knew so little about the game before hiring him.

“I really do very little in terms of preparation for these things,” said Sund. “For me, picking a coach is a lot like drafting a player. You just close your eyes and pick a name.”

The Hawks are currently 12-5, and Woodson said he feels good about the team’s playoff hopes.

“We have been working on these things called free throws,” said Woodson. “I think they could have a big effect on the game.”

JeJe

November 30th, 2009
12:54 pm

Sorry. Forgot the title:

Mike Woodson Starting To Get The Idea

By Trey Daniels

After almost 6 years on the job, and despite 100 more L’s than W’s on his record, Hawks head coach Mike Woodson feels he is finally getting somewhere with his young team.

“I am starting to get it. I am still working on some things, but I think I finally have the basics down,” said Woodson. “Whoever has the most points at the end of the game wins. Once I figured that one out, the rest of it just started falling in place.”

Woodson said he once thought basketball was like golf, where the lower score wins.

“That totally changed the way I approached the game,” said Woodson.

He said he also recently figured out the 3-point line, back court violations and rebounding. Woodson, who has faced rumors of being fired, said he should keep his job.

“I figure it can only get better. Now I can tell our players, ‘Hey, we need 3 points, shoot from over here.’ And it’s actually OK if you miss the shot, you can run to the ball and get it back,” said Woodson. “These are things I can pass on to our players and it should lead to a few wins.”

When asked what he knew about defense, Woodson seemed puzzled.

“You mean it is OK to try to stop the other team? Wow!”

Woodson, who was an assistant coach for the Detroit Pistons before coming to Atlanta, admitted he mostly rode the bench while Larry Brown did most of the work.

“Larry was great,” said Woodson. “He could tell players what a travel is. He could even explain a bounce pass to them. That is part of the reason Detroit was so good.”

Woodson said Brown allowed him to do vital things for him, like hold his clip board and hand Gatorade to players on the bench. The Atlanta coach said he rarely paid attention to the game saying he always found it “a little boring.”

General Manager Rick Sund, a self-proclaimed ‘basketball expert,’ said he didn’t realize Woodson knew so little about the game before hiring him.

“I really do very little in terms of preparation for these things,” said Sund. “For me, picking a coach is a lot like drafting a player. You just close your eyes and pick a name.”

The Hawks are currently 12-5, and Woodson said he feels good about the team’s playoff hopes.

“We have been working on these things called free throws,” said Woodson. “I think they could have a big effect on the game.”

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
1:08 pm

Daniel:
My apologies, I should have set that up for you and I’m such a slow typist that I just got lazy. ‘Peter’ mentioned something about a trade
and you commented about who was out there. I merely speculated (as myself and others did last PM) that Biedrins was a possibility. Not being argumentative just trying to add a fresh perspective. I hope this clears it up. Once again [as the kids say] “my bad”.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
1:13 pm

You are cool with me Grandad, but are you saying trade Joe Johnson for Biedrins? Or Marvin Williams for Biedrins?

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
1:20 pm

Not too get too technical, but Marvin is a BYC player this year, because of his new contract, which significantly reduces his trade value and almost makes trading him impossible, and would essentially cost the Hawks 3 milion dollars out of pocket. Moving Joe Johnson would require that we take back at least 15 milion in salary, so you are not going to be able to get Biedris ($9 milion for that).

Sam from the Swats

November 30th, 2009
1:21 pm

Ken Strickland,

Wow, so you look at game play and you honestly think if given a chance, Marvin would score as much as Joe. I guess we will agree to disagree. You need glasses son….

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
1:22 pm

Jeje,

That “article” is recycled from nearly 2 years ago:
http://www.hawksquawk.net/forums/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=297266&page=&view=&sb=5&o=

It’s still funny as hell, though…

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
1:30 pm

Daniel:
Not necessarily; I’m just a little disappointed in Joe. To me , he acts as if he does not want to be here. ( alot of little things adding up) i actually think Marv is a good player who is used unwisely. As for Biedrins, Ive been advocating a shotblocking/def. presence/@ the [5] for a long time. A.B. fits perfectly. If Joe is going to leave anyway lets @ least get something of value for him. The way he’s playing right now is “uninspired”. I also think he is somehow jealous of J.Crawford. Once again A.B. brings great energy and his game is a perfect match for what we need. Another thing…don’t get me wrong…I am Big Al’s greatest supporter, it’s like many other folks, I would love to see him @ the [4]. Whew > that was alot of work for a fastidious ol’ curmudgeon like myself.

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
1:36 pm

Daniel:
I don’t know the ins and outs of all the trade restictions. That’s R.Sunds job to figure out. But if you say it cannot be done then I’ll have to chalk it up to wishful thinking.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
1:37 pm

Big Al

Detroit 5-9
Philly 5-10
Orlando 1-3
NO 5-10
Houston 6-9
Miami 6-10
Portland 7-10
NO 7-8
Boston 6-9
Lakers 3-8
Washington 4-11
Indiana 11-17

91-162 – .562 FG%

3 pt shots by team
105 – 307

Ya’ll know how I love to talk balance, ball movement and playing inside out. How can anyone not say we should shoot less three pt shots and feed the ball to Al more.

3 pt shots
JJ 25-79
JC 25-85

This is where the shots for Al should come from.

Mz. Hawkdafied

November 30th, 2009
1:41 pm

Dang too bad the Hawks can’t switch divisions with Boston and Cleveland. Atlanta has the same record as Cleveland who is #1 in their division with a 12-5 record. Put Orlando in Cleveland or Boston’s division and see if they’re in the #1 spot. Nope I don’t think so. The Hawks’ division is much more competitive.

Anyway the Hawks have just hit the bumpy part of the roller coaster. I’m sure no one thought an 82 game season was gonna be smooth sailing. I’m just as much disappointed with the losses as anyone. But think about it, the Hawks have won the majority of their games so far and are still one game over .500 on the road and have only one loss at home. The season is far from over, Orlando hasn’t won the division or the series. Detroit hasn’t won the series either, nor Charlotte, nor the Lakers, and the series between the Hornets was split. Why don’t we all take a deep breath, calm down and look for the bright spots sometimes? The season is not over and the ATL Hawks still have a shot at becoming elite.

GO HAWKS, CONTINUE THE RISE, ONE GAME AT A TIME!

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
1:44 pm

Move Joe; then Marv (more than anyone) but also Al, Josh, Jamal, and J.Teague become exponentially better [scorers]/players.

Mr.W. becomes worse if thats possible.

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
1:45 pm

KevinA,

Call Woody and tell him that’s what you want. I wouldn’t wait by the phone for him to call back, though.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
1:46 pm

Josh and Al are clearly our best and most efficient weapons. They need to average 15 attempts per game. Especially on the road.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
1:51 pm

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
1:45 pm
KevinA,

Call Woody and tell him that’s what you want. I wouldn’t wait by the phone for him to call back, though.

Just seems to me a better option than “Fire Woody” , Trade JJ or Marvin, get a better big, find a better pg etc.etc. Everybody has a view, mine is just different.

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
1:57 pm

Mz. Hawkdafied:
You’re absolutely right.
But when I get a smudge on my ‘rose colored glasses’ I’m like everyone else. I tend to focus only on the smudge, until I clean my glasses. Being somewhat OCD I can’t see anything but the smudge and he(’scuse me) it drives me nuts.

A Thinking Fan

November 30th, 2009
2:07 pm

I’m done with the Hawks!

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
2:09 pm

Mz. Hawkdafied

November 30th, 2009
1:41 pm

But think about it, the Hawks have won the majority of their games so far and are still one game over .500 on the road and have only one loss at home.

The schedule looks better on paper for the next 20 games. My preseason estimate was 50 – 54 wins. To reach the high end of my estimate we can absorb 23 more losses. So far we are on pace to do better. What is not to like. All of us like to play GM or Coach after every loss or win but looking at our record now, before the season started, I think most of us would have taken it. It is the glass half full for me. Lets get the next two games and then prepare for a tough Dallas team.

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
2:14 pm

Ah, I see. So the Hawks’ perimeter players should be expected to design and implement an offensive system that gets more frontcourt touches. Funny…I always had thought that teams do better when the designing of the offense is done by coaches instead of players. If not, then I guess it’s just coincidence that 22 of the last 25 NBA Finals were won by just 5 coaches (Phil, Pop, Riley, Daly, and Rudy T), all of whom implemented offensive systems that were sufficiently honed to allow players to only have to worry about executing their role in the offense. I guess we should just accept that since [JJ/Marvin/Josh/Bibby/Whoever else on the Hawks you don't like] can’t do Woody’s job for him, he’s not worth keeping have to do more than that.

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
2:16 pm

* I guess we should just accept that since [JJ/Marvin/Josh/Bibby/Whoever else on the Hawks you don't like] can’t do Woody’s job for him, he’s not worth keeping unless he is able to do more than that.

Fundamentals

November 30th, 2009
2:27 pm

All this talk of breaking up the team, firing the coach, trading for folks that just aren’t available or worth the expense is a bit too much. Anyone complaining about the record hasn’t watched the Hawks for 20+ years. This is the top of the shelf version of our Hawks. We’ve never seen better…but we’re not happy. Where were all of you during the dark times in the ATL? Probably in your momma’s womb!

We’ve got some problems yes, but we also have opportunities. When we bring the effort on D and on the boards with Josh and Al we look so flawless. When we actually run the offense and bring both of them in early and often we look flawless. It all comes from a team effort on both ends.

I do agree JJ pounds the ball, all the guards chuck up a 3 at the end of the clock to no avail, nobody really tries to establish the inside game. Marvin, Josh and Al all lose interest because there’s just no chance they’ll see consistent balls thrown their way.

I predicted the season start at 14-4 during the preseason. We’re pretty close to that. We should win 3 of the next 4 and 9 of 12 with reasonable team effort.

Rebound!
Play D!
Use the bench!
Play like a team!
Get back to establishing Josh & AL down low!
Move Marvin to the 2nd team as a 2nd option w/ Crawford!
Only shoot the 3 in the flow of the game…not at the end of every 24 second clock!

It’s not that easy for our team to run most anyone out of the gym if we stick to the fundamentals.

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
2:38 pm

Joe’s jealous of Crawford’s natural scoring ability, and fan support, so he’s pressing. He also knows this is Smoove’s team now. He and Ole Woodrow are fighting for contracts. It is so obvious, it’s pathetic. I think JJ’s feelings were hurt when Sund made the move for Crawdaddy, right after he turned down more $ than he’s worth. I really do. I think he was more comfortable with Acie and Speedy sitting on the bench, than a guy who can come in and basically do what he likes to do. Score buckets!

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
2:50 pm

Daniel Good post, It sure is quiet from the Woody haters. Is clear and obvious to most normal people that Woody is doing an out standing job with the hand thats dealt him

JeJe, I dont thinks its Woody who is changing, but a combination of fans starting to see what Woody is doing with what he is given, haters running out of wind, and people jumping on the band wagon. Woody is still coaching the same, he just has more tools. He still needs a legit center to complete the charge to the top. He’ll never crack the top three in a 7 game set with out one .
Im glad your perception is changing.

Im not saying Woodson will win, coy, but hes doing an outstanding job and outside of hateville ga, most people see him as an easy top ten coach in both conferences.

This blog wastes a lot of time trying to fix what aint broke. They should be concentrating on putting pressure on Sund to get Woodson a legitimate center.

Josh is an allstar!

KevinA Little

November 30th, 2009
2:54 pm

Everything is FINE!

We’re on a pace to win my predicted total. It isn’t signifigant that the Hawks were humiliated in Detroit, or that Joe Johnson went 5-for-18.

Nothing to see here, folks!

Sowing seed of ignorance

November 30th, 2009
2:59 pm

THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION:

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
2:38 pm

Joe’s jealous of Crawford’s natural scoring ability, and fan support, so he’s pressing. He also knows this is Smoove’s team now. He and Ole Woodrow are fighting for contracts. It is so obvious, it’s pathetic. I think JJ’s feelings were hurt when Sund made the move for Crawdaddy, right after he turned down more $ than he’s worth. I really do. I think he was more comfortable with Acie and Speedy sitting on the bench, than a guy who can come in and basically do what he likes to do. Score buckets!

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
3:07 pm

terrell barron:
Nail on the head!

Fundamentals:
I remember when the Hawks were the best team in the NBA.
They didn’t want to pay Joe Caldwell after they drafted ‘Pistol’
so he went over to the ABA. That began the breakup [Hudson,Bridges,Silas,Bellamy,et al].
Now;(re post @ 2:27 PM) Do you think Mr.W. would still be employed: LAL/NYK/Bos. or any other place where expectations are higher.

* side note *
If ESPN had existed baack in the day, ‘Joe Caldwell’
would be a/an HOFer and a household name. He was something else.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
3:19 pm

Grandad- I like Biedris, too, just not really feasible to get him at this point. Nice Joe Caldwell reference.

terrell- you have no idea what Joe Johnson is feeling. He has had a couple of subpar games, but he is still in the top ten MVP candidates. He is worth what a team will pay him, and most(every single one) players of Joe’s calibre always go to free agency, which does not mean that he doesn’t want to be here. He has been a more vocal leader this year, leading the team in assists (despite the ball hog claims) and is the best player on the team that is 12-5 and on pace for a 60 (that’s right sixty) win season. I certainly didn’t see this team winning 60, I was more in the 52-55 range. You don’t like Joe, or his game, and want him out of here, that is your opinion and you have the right to it, but don’t try to make up stories about his mindset to fit your feelings.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
3:27 pm

BTW- guys the Hawks are running a really great ticket special where you get tickets for one of the Clevland or Boston games and you get the same seats for 10 bucks to another game. Essentially you can get baseline level seats for two games for 125, which is really a good deal. The deal ends today though!!!

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
3:28 pm

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
2:14 pm
Ah, I see. So the Hawks’ perimeter players should be expected to design and implement an offensive system that gets more frontcourt touches. Funny…I always had thought that teams do better when the designing of the offense is done by coaches

I think the present offensive system allows for the post players to get the ball. Just seems to me JJ and JC are more interested in ISO and jacking 3’s than playing team ball.

We could do a Woody bash and ask why he does not yank JJ when he is cold or bench Jamal and JJ for missing so many 3 pt shots. Both stars should be able to know when they are cold and you would think be smart enough to use their impressive skills to get the ball to the post. I think it has less to do with the system and more to do with ego.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
3:33 pm

Mz. Hawkdafied-
I agree with your post except, I think the Hawks have more than just a shot at becoming elite. I think they are there.

confusius

November 30th, 2009
3:34 pm

It is easier to say the other person has changed than to admit we are wrong.

A fool continues stubbornly in the path of foolishness,, where a wise man changes his path.

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
3:38 pm

When the Hawks were young, inexperienced, losing, and going through trying and embarrassing times with management, Woodson did an excellent job of keeping the team focused and playing hard. Now that the players and team have matured and are expected to win, Woodson has demonstrated difficulty in handling the added responsibility and high expectations.

Over the last 4gms we’ve witnessed the following from Woodson:

(1)He’s abandoned even trying to effectively manage more than 6-7 players.

(2)He’s abandoned any attempt to manage the mins of more than 6-7 players.

(3)He’s abandoned any pretence of trying to develop PG JTeague.

(4)He’s abandoned the fast paced, attacking, inside out high scoring style OFF which had us leading the NBA in fastbreak pts, pts in the paint and shooting percentage for his beloved guard dominated, jumpshooting, ISO, perimeter oriented halfcourt OFF.

The end result of all of this is:

(1)We’ve gone from averaging 108PPG to 88PPG over the last 4gms. We’ve managed to score 100pts only once in those 4gms, and 88pts is our 2nd highest total.

(2)We’ve gone from a dominant rebounding team to one that’s been dominated by 3 of the last 4 opponents.

(3)Since he’s reverted back to his preferred jumpshooting halfcourt OFF, and no longer attack the basket or play uptempo, we no longer lead the NBA in fastbreak pts, pts in the paint or shooting percentage and our assist per gm are also way down.

(4)We’ve gone from beating teams by double figures to being beaten by double figures by lesser teams 3 of the last 4gms .

(5)We’re being dominated in every phase of the gm by teams that were previously struggling and made lineup changes.

(6)We’ve seen him abandon any pretence of reducing JJ’s mins, and as a result, JJ has reverted back to playing one on one, ISO.

And with all of this, we still have some ameba brained morons with a seriously unnatural man crush’s on Woodson who insist on blaming all of this on Marvin Williams, not their beloved Mike Woodson. Marvin’s overall numbers and performance has changed very little over the last 4gms, yet these selfserving morons still insist it’s all his fault.

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
3:43 pm

KevinA I think the answer to your comment goes back to your and my difference on where the offense starts. I say the outside opens the paint you say the inside opens the outside, we both agree you need a in/out game to play on the highest levels

The reason this team is not capable of starting from the inside against the real contenders is that Horford cant create nor finish in the low post off true centers. He is better scoring when being set up rather than dropping the ball in the low post and ISO horford. Its not effective against the legitimate centers, so our offense stalls with that approach as was evident against Orlando.

Horford is a blue collar power forward and I like him alot, dont get me wrong. I just like to keep it real.

Hawks need a center.

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
3:45 pm

Daniel, JJ might be the best 1 on 1 player, but Josh Smith is the best overall player on the Hawks this year. PERIOD! And nothing on this blog is ever based on FACTS. Usually all presumptions. Actually, I was just trying to start a controversy and I think it worked. lol!

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
3:46 pm

Id rather believe the pros than an unlearned argument. Perhaps you should explain your wisdom( or lack there of) to ESPN, The other pro coaches, or the other fans out side this hate cell.

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
3:47 pm

Good post terrell barron. I admire your honesty.

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
3:50 pm

Daniel , I have to agree with the notion that the hawks are closer to the big three, but you would get in that circle with a power forward as your center.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
3:56 pm

Truth-Serum,

Maybe the Hawks will go into cap space and get one. While were at it we could use a guard who can defend and pass. As bad as we are at rebounding we are equally troubled by quick pg’s.

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
3:57 pm

TERRELL BARRON-you hit the nail on the head. I believe JJ turned down the Hawks contract offer because he wanted to force Sund to have to match a max contract to retain him, not because he had any intentions of leaving. He didn’t think Sund had any other viable options at SG, but Sund shocked his butt by making the trade for Crawford.

JJ knows if Crawford continues to score and rack up assists, he could end up being a sign and trade casuality instead of being resigned. Crawfords presence will force him to sign for less in order to remain a Hawk. Offensively, Crawford has demonstrated he can do everything JJ does, and he does it quicker, faster and will be doing it a hell of a lot cheaper.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
3:59 pm

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
3:45 pm
Daniel, JJ might be the best 1 on 1 player, but Josh Smith is the best overall player on the Hawks this year. PERIOD!

There is a changing of the guard. Josh is playing at an All-Star pace.

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
4:04 pm

Ah, I see. So since the offense “allows for” the ball to get passed to the post, it’s entirely up to Lue/JJ/Bibby/Flip/Crawford to get the ball to the low post players. Woodson’s job is done. The offensive system (or rather, the lack of an offensive system) “allows for” it to happen. That’s enough for you, I guess.

So what if the system also “allows for” the guards to dominate the ball, as has been the case for most of the past 3.5 years? The onus is on the players to make something out of nothing. They shouldn’t need the COACH to create a system that affirmatively calls for ball movement (like Riley’s and the Triangle), constant off-ball movement (like Daly’s and Rudy T’s), or for the ball to go through the high post (like the Triangle or Pop’s offense). It’s up to the players to make that happen. Woody should just be able to sit on the sideline with his clipboard, talk about energy and rebounding during timeouts, coast to a 48-52 win season, and then watch the Hawks get shredded once they face a good defensive team after the starters are exhausted from overuse.

So what if JJ came from a system in which he was hailed as one of the most unselfish off-guards in the league – and in which he actually served as the backup PG – and only started getting called a ballhog once Harrington left and Woody publicly said that JJ needed to carry the team?

So what if Crawford came in talking about how much he wanted to pass, and then reverted back to being a chucker after Woody spent weeks talking about how he wanted Crawford to shoot first and ask questions later? And so what if he’s just following the same pattern as Lue and Flip? Ignore that. Crawford’s volume shooting is his fault, not Woody’s.

Yup, all of that is JJ and Crawford’s fault. When they do what Woody expects him to do without a word of objection from Woody, the blame falls on them.

Fundamentals

November 30th, 2009
4:12 pm

Grandad: I honestly liked the idea that they give Woody a chance. He has improved along with his players each year. I always felt like our kids needed that solid figure to grow with. Bringing in new ideals, new staff would just leave our kids selfishly seeking stats for themselves. By keeping Woody we have maintained our “family” as it were. Maybe in other places swapping coaches quickly would’ve worked, but I don’t think so here. In all the turmoil we’re winning much in part to the solid nature of our team’s core – coach included. If Woody is competitive in the second round this season is a success. I really don’t care if they lose in the 1st round, as long as it’s competitive and we’re beaten by a better team and that we gave it our all.

Would Doug Collins have rattled off Phil’s championships if he were allowed to stay. Some say yes, some say no. I’m of the persuasion that those Chicago teams could’ve won with you or me on the bench. They developed a solid team over the years and Phil reaped the benefits. Lakers are much the same. Get the right pieces and they can win regardless. I do agree coaches have influence, but not so much with that kind of personnel. Sloan, Rudy T and Pop also have had some darn good mature pieces to play. Woody’s never had that. As our kids grow, he’ll grow. That’s been our plan. It’s gotten better each year.

Woody has a chance to pass Fratello in my opinion if he could just get our kids out of this recent growing pain. We’re growing from pretender to contender. Players and coaches alike need time to develop and grow. We can’t decide how well we’ve grown till after the season concludes.

If we roll in with 4-5 injured players and get rolled I’ll be first in line to kick Woody in the backside on his way out. If we give a good solid effort as a team with all our pieces I’ll commend him for a job well done. Judge him after the marathon.

As for the comments about JJ – I think he is forcing it to live up to everyone loving Crawford. Is he disgruntled? We’ll see. I honestly hope the guy didn’t take the money to give us flexibility in the offseason. He’ll lose money in 2010 by not taking our deal. To make money he’ll have to go to the basement again. I don’t think he’s going to choose that now that he’s tasted winning. I think his current shooting slump comes from not getting Josh and AL going down low. The inside presence opens up his game so much. Pounding the ball shuts him down.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
4:14 pm

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
3:57 pm

JJ knows if Crawford continues to score and rack up assists

Am disappointed with both players assists totals. Jamal can do better than 2.8 per game, he has been over 5 per a couple of years in his career. JJ is matching his career avg of 4.4 but in 06,08,09 he was closer to 6 per game. Those 3-4 extra assists we are missing might be the difference in tight games.

LaMont Williams

November 30th, 2009
4:15 pm

I’m a Pistons fan and I like to read other blogs and papers – been doing it for years. I won’t claim to know your team or your situation – but let me say this…give your younger players time to develop. When our Pistons were going to the conference finals every year – we acted as though it was some right that we had – and we still complained about this and that. Now that we are struggling – most fans will tell you that they appreciated those teams more now than then. What we are relearning is how TOUGH it is to win/compete daily in the NBA. We could see that you’re team was having an “off” day. And our boys still had to play 48 minutes to win. All I’m saying is be objective. I saw the Hawks beat the Celtics (easily I thought). You’re not going to win every game. Our team was kinda desperate and needed the win bad. So don’t trip on one game. I understand the issues you expressed (I read two to three pages of the blog). Team maturity doesn’t come overnight. I certainly don’t want to see your team in the first round (if we even make the playoffs).

Fundamentals

November 30th, 2009
4:18 pm

Amen Lamont!

Harlem Renaissance

November 30th, 2009
4:22 pm

OH MAN THIS SHYT IS FUNNY. YOU WANNA RUN WITH CRAFWORD AND GET RID OF JOE JOHNSON?? OK!!! SEND HIM UP HERE TO NYC. BRING HIM AND DANTONI BACK TOGETHER AND ADD BOSH, AND WE’LL BE HEADED FOR A TITLE. YOU LOSERS WILL BE BACK IN THE BASEMENT, WHERE THE HAWKS ALWAYS END UP.

WE ALREADY TRIED CRAWFORD AND BOY IS A STREAKY SCORER, AND THAT’S IT. NEVER MET A SHOT HE DIDN’T LIKE AND CAN’T PLAY D. HE’D HAVE TWO GOOD SHOOTING HAMES AND THEN 6 BAD ONES. AND HE NEVER FIGURED OUT HOW TO STOP ANYOEN ON D. THERE WERE PARADES ON KNICKES BLOGS WHEN WE FINALLY TRADED HIS SORRY AZZ. JOSH MAKES SPORTSCENTER BUT WE’LL LET HIM SHOOT ALLLLL DAY. BOY’S JUMPER IS UGLIER THAN YOU FOOLS MAYOR.

SO STUPID. NOT THAT I EXPECTED ANYTHING BETTER FROM ATLANTA FANS.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
4:26 pm

Truth- after Howard who is the next best 5 in the East? I would say Horford. I would rather have him than Perkins or Shaq at this point in their careers.

Terrell- this is NOT a dis on Josh, who is playing at All Star levels, but he has also been erratic this season, but because his play is SOOO improved it seems less noticeable than Joe’s. Joe is still the best player on this team.

Niremetal- Dude, you are going after Woodson hard these days. Listen, if you can get me Phil, Pop(my favorite coach), Sloan, no-Daly(obvious), not Riley(he has gone off the deep end), then I would gladly give Woodson the boot. None of those guys are available by the way. But, seriously would you rather have Stan Van Gundy? Mike Brown? Flip Saunders? Terry Stotts?

I would consider Rick Carlise, though.

JeJe

November 30th, 2009
4:37 pm

Amazing posts.

Ken Strickland’s posts with his numberings are spot on

USE THE BENCH

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
4:37 pm

Daniel,

The only big name I know of who I would hire is Carlisle. For the rest, we’d have to roll the dice and pick up an assistant from somewhere – but Phil, Pop, Daly, Rudy, and Coach Slick were not born with rings on their fingers. I assume it would not be too difficult for Sund to sit down prospective coaches and ask “Explain to me your offensive philosophy. Diagram for me what you would want to be the default offensive setup that the Hawks use. Etc.”

In any case, I agree that Carlisle aside, I don’t see any well-known coaches out there who would be good fits for us. More than anything, I’m pained that we didn’t hire Doc when we had the chance. My point is more that the criticisms hurled at JJ and Jamal seem to be based on a conception that they should be doing thing that usually are expected of the coach rather than the players – ie we’re expecting them to create a ball-movement oriented offensive system out of a “system” that instead focuses on creating isolation and other one-on-one plays. That seems to me a wildly misplaced criticism.

And as for Harlem Renaissance…let me just say that after reading your post, I’m shocked that you actually managed to spell “Renaissance” correctly.

LaMont Williams

November 30th, 2009
4:37 pm

One more comment – some of you are ripping your team like they’re 0 – 20. Tell you the truth, I don’t understand all of your angst. What gives? You’re not gonna be 72-10.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
4:39 pm

LaMont- thanks for the post. All fans get myopic about their own teams from time to time. Nice to have an “outsider” perspective.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
4:40 pm

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
4:04 pm

Since I am not invited to the practices or the film room when they review the games it is hard for me to answer. It took years for Josh to give up the 3. Was that Woody or Josh. Was that coach or player. From Maubery to AI to McGrady to Jackson there seems to be a disconnect between player and coach. Don Nelson might argue the players don’t listen. Jackson might argue Nelson doesn’t listen. You seem to give the players a pass. I think it is much more complicated than that. It would be interesting to see and hear the reactions of the players as they go through the game film. Unless you are there I think it is all about guessing.

Daniel

November 30th, 2009
4:46 pm

Nire- This is the NBA we are talking about and players play. Coaches decide on a rotation, control minutes and try to keeep a team focused that is about it. RARELY, are coaches calling plays, it is the players. I get your comment about not fair to JJ and Crawford. I think the blame falls squarely on both the coach and players. Lack of effort is lack of effort, it is not scheme, etc.. That is the main reason for the last three losses.

Anyway, no coaching change is going to happen this year, so the proof will be in the pudding so to speack, I still say a 52+ win season with a strong showing in the second round or conference finals appearance and we are headed in the right direction. Despite, the recent struggles we are still on pace to exceed those goals.

KevinA

November 30th, 2009
5:13 pm

LaMont Williams

November 30th, 2009
4:37 pm
One more comment – some of you are ripping your team like they’re 0 – 20. Tell you the truth, I don’t understand all of your angst. What gives? You’re not gonna be 72-10.

I expect another 23-27 losses. Talking about ways to improve our team is not necessarily ripping anybody or anything. If you dig around you will find that Josh is having a career year, Al a career year, JJ scoring at his normal all-star level. Jamal providing the punch we needed of the bench.etc

There are concerns like not playing our young rookie enough, to many minutes for JJ, to many ISO plays, one game 27 assists and the next 13-16. Players shooting 3 pt shots around the .300 mark while our two studs down low are around the .545. Stuff like that.

This is not a marriage. We can talk about the good and the bad. I can tell you one thing, this year is much easier to watch than our 13 win season.

Drewcat

November 30th, 2009
5:18 pm

Hey hate to interrupt you guys got goin on here bloggers, but has anyone noticed the lack of Hawks coverage we’re getting from our beat writer, Ken-whatever-your-last-name-is???

I mean Sekou was on it! We had an article everyday, keepin us posted on the team’s psyche after big wins, and how the team planned on turning it around after disappointing losses.
Now Mr. Ken simply throws up the blog title: “Hawks-Place NBA Team Here” and basically let’s us blog away. Maybe Sekou spolied us with excellent NBA coverage, but I am demanding that we at least get some insight about this team, seeing as though Mr. Ken attends the games and actually gets a press pass to speak with players.

Ken, this team has progressed steadily over the past six seasons, and I believe we deserve a better beat writer than this. I know you are temporary, but c’mon man give us avid fans something to read

rms

November 30th, 2009
5:46 pm

Ken is only a temporary fill in until AJC decides to bring in a real beat writer. Ken apparently is not up on Hawks basketball and must have picked the shorter straw when it came down to who wants to be a temp beat writer for the Hawks! Just tryin’ to make it out alive…..

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
6:18 pm

Drewcat, an article everyday. Sekou went weeks several times without putting up a new blog. Cut Ken some slack. At least we can still post opinions about the hometeam.

terrell barron

November 30th, 2009
6:19 pm

Drewcat, I meant an article everyday?

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
6:49 pm

Daniel,

You’re right in that in the NBA, a lot of coaches only worry about deciding on a rotation, controlling minutes, and keeping the team focused. But not a single title-winning team in the past 30 years has had a coach who did only those things. In fact, the only coach that has even made the Finals in the past 20 years that fits the description you gave is Mike Brown. And we all saw how well those Finals turned out…

You also changed what I said. I never said Woody should be calling individual plays. I said he should be implementing a different SYSTEM. And most playoff NBA coaches not named Mike Brown have a default “system” that the players go into on each play unless a different play is called. It’s usually nothing as complicated as the Triangle. It can be a system that’s based not on a player’s positioning, but rather on constant movement – both ball movement and off-ball movement – like in Nelson/Adelman/D’Antoni systems. More often, it can be a basic motion offense like Popovich, Rudy T, or SVG’s, which (like the Triangle) emphasize the creation and maintenance of spacing and open passing lanes. It can also be based around the use of multiple screens off and especially on the ball, like Jerry Sloan and Larry Brown. Regardless, effective offensive systems are designed to take pressure off whoever has the ball – even if the ball goes to the low block or to a guard on the wing, he’s not on his own if he decides to go one-on-one. Of course, good coaches and players will often throw a change-up by calling for an ISO play – Phil’s teams did this several times a game with Michael and Kobe. But those plays are the exception rather than the rule; they are used as a change-of-pace rather than as Plan A. And most coaches are bright enough to tweak or even create anew an offensive system that fits the players they have, rather than forcing an offensive system on them – like, most notably, Pat Riley has done at each of his coaching stops.

Put another way – I don’t think JJ would be pounding the ball so much if he were being coached by any of the guys listed above. And if he did, he probably would find himself traded, and sure as hell wouldn’t find himself playing 40 minutes per game.

Unfortunately, Woody’s “system” emphasizes isolation plays as the rule rather than the exception. Movement – both on and off the ball – clearly is not emphasized, nor is spacing. As I said, it was remarkable watching the Magic game and seeing how well their perimeter players moved to create open passing lanes when the ball went to the post…while our guys stood as if enclosed in cement when the ball went to Horford or Smoove on the low block. It looked like JJ and Crawford’s feet were cemented to the floor. And when JJ or Jamal run their ISO plays, we see the same thing – Horford and Smoove usually don’t move or cut to the basket. There are times that the do (just like there are times that I’ve seen Bibby fade open to the corner when the ball goes to the low block), but it’s the exception rather than the rule.

You don’t need to call individual plays from the sideline to have an effective offensive system. The problem is that Woody seems to expect JJ to be LeBron, and since JJ isn’t LeBron, a “system” designed around isolating him on 25-30% of our offensive possessions is bound to break down against good teams (or even against bad teams when JJ isn’t “feeling it”). But instead of blaming JJ for not being as good as LeBron, doesn’t it make a hell of a lot more sense to blame Woody for treating him like he is LeBron?

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
7:02 pm

To use an analogy – I think JJ is not unlike Paul Pierce. Boston fans were frothing at the mouth and calling him a ballhog during the Jim O’Brien era. Then Doc Rivers came in and voila – his shooting percentages went up and his shot attempts went down immediately. The trend continued even more strongly when KG and Ray Allen arrived. This year, Pierce is shooting 51% from the floor.

JJ is in the same class as the Big Three in Boston. He’s not enough to carry you to a title on his own, but he can be the offensive frontman for a title contender given the right coach and the right teammates.

Truth-Serum

November 30th, 2009
7:15 pm

Harlem Renaissance , you’ll have to look over the guys here. They are long on zeal and opinions but short on knowledge. I guess its best to say this is football country and basketball has always been a east coast west coast experience.

KevinA I hope that we cover this MAJOR, disadvantage, by availability in the cap. I dont find there to be a major issue with our guards, they are among the best, in my opinion.

Daniel, its not a matter of the top ten. Its a matter of who can compete with the big three, thats who we have to over take.

Ive offered Lopez, who is playing on a 0-16 team, as a player who can compete with howard and shaq, there arent many. Horford cannot compete with them no matter how he compares with the also rans.

Drewcat

November 30th, 2009
7:16 pm

Haha glad Ken heard me and gave us an update! Didn’t mean to whine, but I had to hear something from somebody the way BEN WALLACE and the Pistons killed us on the glass yesterday! Ben wallace still got game too, maybe we should have pursued him this offseason. the pistons are basically paying him pennies.
The multi million dollar question: Would Woodson play him or let him enter the retirement home from the bench? I would guess the latter.

Sautee

November 30th, 2009
7:58 pm

“Harlem Renaissance , you’ll have to look over the guys here. They are long on zeal and opinions but short on knowledge.”

This from the man who thinks Zaza gets so many offensive rebounds because he is lazy getting back on defense.

LOL!

Sautee

November 30th, 2009
8:12 pm

The only center with more double-doubles than Al Horford?

Dwight Howard.

Uck!

November 30th, 2009
8:47 pm

A little knowledge is dangerous, very little knowledge is …a nuisance.

*nuisance? see the above poster?

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
8:49 pm

Over the last 4gms, JJ’s numbers have fallen in every category, yet Woodson continues to increase his mins. HOW STUPID DOES A HC HAVE TO BE NOT TO REALIZE THERE’S A PROBLEM? Over those same 4gms, we’ve scored 20PPG less than we scored over the 1st 13gms. HOW STUPID DOES A HC HAVE TO BE NOT TO REALIZE THERE’S A PROBLEM?

HOW STUPID DOES A HC HAVE TO BE not to realize what we’ve been doing on OFF over the last 4gms has turned us into a totally different and average team that’s no where near as effective as what we were during the 1st 13gms?

Uck!

November 30th, 2009
8:53 pm

Not as stupid as repeating the same tired failing message of idiocy…

*Idiocy? see above poster.

Joe Mama

November 30th, 2009
8:54 pm

Wrong again!

Joe Mama

November 30th, 2009
9:12 pm

Drewcat

Ken say’s why should he bother putting up a new page when guys paste the same tired message. Why put up a new page for this Shyt?

Uck!

November 30th, 2009
9:12 pm

Ditto on the same tired message J.Mama.

WHAT ABOUT JOE

November 30th, 2009
9:31 pm

TO ALL THE IDIOTS ON HERE BASHING MARVIN, I HAVE 2 QUESTIONS.

1. WHO TEAM IS IT?

2. wHO MAKES THE MAKE MONEY FOR THE HAWKS?

THE ANSWER TO BOTH ARE JOE JOHNSON.

HOW ABOUT A JOE FOR MONTA ELLIS AND BIEDRENS

JOE IS NOT AN SUPERSTAR

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
9:37 pm

Fundamentals:
I really enjoy your perspective. However, Mr.W. has had ample time. I refuse to believe folks in other cities would put up with him.

L.W.:
We have been waiting a long time for them to mature. The time to compete is now. You folks in Det. would not put up with Mr.W.’s lack of innovation or imagination any more than us. How would you like it if young R.Stuckey were still glued to the bench. Correct me if I’m wrong but he came out same yr. as Acie. He would probably be in GS now if you had MW supervising your team. We have had patience, we should have to wait ‘no longer’.

TS:
Not trying to start up with you. We actually agree, sort of, about Al. However, trust me, you play inside out [not outside in]. Think of a fb. team establishing the run to set up the passing game. One must come before the other. Plese try to have an open mind. Once again, I’m not trying to get you riled up. One other matter, the ESPN guys have not cornered the market on b-ball IQ. Something you may be surprised to know, is the knowledge, experience and expertise some on this board may or may not have. Lastly, I was on board with MW for a long time. I’m slow to change but when I do it usually lasts. Have a good day, sir.

niremetal & Daniel:
For what it’s worth…Mr.W. seems to have ‘NO’ philosophy[system].

Blast

November 30th, 2009
9:37 pm

Crazy night here on this blog!

Rebounds and Joe cost the Hawks the game yesterday. Pistons simply over powered Hawks on the boards. Even Woody was worried about Pistons new lineup before the game, and we all saw why. Hawks stopped them on the first try, second, but Ben Wallace and co just kept coming up with more offensive rebounds and put backs.

Then Joe sucked again.

If Joe is jealous of Crawford, then he needs to snap out of it quickly, because Jamal is here for the next two years and Joe is not. I said it before the season started. Was Crawford an insurance in case Joe does not resign? I expect Joe to step out of his funk, but if he can’t handle Crawford been on the team, then trade his ass!

Have always loved Joe, and first time ever of saying this, but if he is holding the Hawks back, then trade his ass! Hope he resigns, though, and conform to team concept. Bball is a team game, not a one on one. Joe cannot win ballgames by himself.

About Josh and Joe, me thinks right now that Josh is the best Hawks player. He has certainly been the more consistent. ATL Hawks are Josh Smith’s team right now, especially if Joe is planning to jump ship!

KellZ!

Not the first time Woody’s girls will be featured on this blog and probably not the last either. But Bone certainly went above himself this time. Wasn’t so risque before.

Vava74.

Great post @ 3:50am. Best of the night! Them new found Hawks fans seems to think the team should win every game and skyrochet to the top this season, forgetting their lowly past. I just laugh and scroll through when I see their crazy ass posts! Where were they when Hawks won 13 games in an entire season? And we still watched and rooted for them?

NBA records so far, top seven teams:

Phoenix: 14-3. LA: 13-3. Boston: 13-4. Orlando: 14-4. Atlanta: 12-5. Cleveland: 12-5. Denver: 12-5. Add Portland @ 12-7. Have not seen Hawks in such rarified company in eons! Yes they screwed up with Detriot, but they were not going to win every game anyway.

This one sucked, though. I fully expected Hawks to beat Pistons, and Marvin?

Have been trying to build a case for Marvin, but more and more this season, I feel he might be the weakest link. Joe hugs the ball too much and is in slump, Zaza has been a bonehead and Woody is not playing his bench more or yanking Joe out when he is playing bad, but Marvin seems to have regressed, man. Can’t hit open jumpers when he is open! Just like Joe, Marvin has to step up!

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
9:44 pm

Sautee:
Big Al second best [5] in the East.
I would still love to see him get PT @ the [4].
I would still love to see us get a def. minded [5].
Big Al would still be my favorite Hawk.

Grandad

November 30th, 2009
9:51 pm

Blast – “Amen”
One small dif. of opinion. You said, and I agree, It’s a team game. Then why do we have to designate one player for it to be “his team”.
Along those lines Josh does not yet have the maturity for such responsibility.

Blast

November 30th, 2009
9:55 pm

Would be great to see Marion Jones in the WNBA, man. Have always loved that lady!

Blast

November 30th, 2009
10:16 pm

Grandad,

On the issue of deligating one player to be his team, I think that is more a fault of Woody not taking control and then Joe of taking advantage of his coach not taking control of pulling his best player when he plays out of control!

Simple. If Joe is hurting the team, then take him out! Let him stew and envision all those big dollars he could have been making with the Hawks instead of worrying about free agency and trying to play up to match those $$. The truth is easy. Since Joe declined to sign an extension with Hawks this summer, how much money he will get in free agency will depend on how well the Hawks perform this year. If Hawks sucked and Joe with them, then Joe cannot afford to have Hawks have a sub-par season.

Good night folks. This is me signing off.

Mike is Back

November 30th, 2009
10:26 pm

LaMont Williams, we hear ya bro. If nothing, you have to admire guy’s passion for the team. When your legacy is as dubious as the Hawks…your old ghosts are always standing around somewhere waiting to remind you of your past. It’s just a hang over from yeeeeeeeeeeeeeears of mediocrity. lol

I’m just as guilty as most…it took me while to come around to Samuel way of thinking…but seriously when you take a realistic look at what the Hawks has accomplished thus far…how can you not consider Woody for COY. Like JJ said…they are human too. They will bounce back.

These young Hawks are in uncharted territory…its hard to swallow…but there will be games like Detroit. It was hard to phantom in the off season…but this team has exceeded everyone expectation…yet the coach deserve no credit for the team progression…C MON MAN!!!!!!!

GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ken Strickland

November 30th, 2009
11:27 pm

Our next 3gms will be crucial. We play Toronto 12/2, New York 12/4 and Dallas 12/5. The question is, will Woodson try to right the ship by using his bench and allowing the team to return to the style of play that was so effective for us before the last 4gms? Or, will he continue standing on the sidelines with arms folded and encourage JJ, Bibby and Crawford to run ISO’s and shoot jumpers? Will he shorten his rotation and play JJ 40+mins even if he’s stinking up the place?

MIKE IS BACK-it goes both ways. When we were kicking butt the 1st 13 gms, Woodson’s harem was giving him all of the credit and declaring him COY. However, now that the team has reverted back to playing his preferred style of OFF, while losing and getting embarrassed, they’re suddenly silent, except to attack anyone that brings up Woodson’s contributions.

Woodson definitely deserves some credit for what he done with this team, especially during the turbulent period when the ASG, former GM BKnight and Woodson were all at odds. But that time has passed, and he’s got an extension for what he did. This is now. What he accomplished in the past has nothing to do with the present. You hear Woodson apologists talk about the hand he was dealt or what he had to work with way back when. But, these same apologists conviently fail to mention the talent, depth, experience, versatility and athleticism he has at his disposal RIGHT NOW.

When a HC has more to work with, you expect more. All of his apologists conviently forget how we started last season with a 6gm winning streak, only to fall back to reality. It looks like we’re following that same formula again this yr. No one with an actual IQ can tell me Smoove, JJ, Bibby, Marvin, Horford and Crawford all of a sudden decided among themselves to switch from a style of play that generated 108PPG over the forst 13gms to a system that’s generated 88PPG over the last 4gms.

The 3 players that control the ball and the OFF are JJ, Bibby and Crawford, and they also run the ISO’s and one on one’s. Over the last 4gms, Woodson has increased the MPG of each player because they’re running the OFF he wants the team to run, AND THAT SAYS IT ALL!!

And I don’t want to hear any of that crap about it being too early to judge. It certainly wasn’t too early for you Woodson loving idiots to declare him COY when we were on that 7gm winning streak. The man did a good job for us when we were down and out. But he’s obviously over his head now.

Melvin

November 30th, 2009
11:38 pm

Interesting point of veiw from an NBA.com article as to why the Hawks improved over the past few years….

“What is coaching but getting players to become the best they can be, then showing that on a nightly basis? Anyone who’s seen the improvement in Josh Smith under Woodson’s tough love the last four years can’t have any doubts about Woodson’s abilities as a coach.

“He’s caught so much hell from me,” Woodson said Friday. “He’s stayed the course, man, in terms of how we viewed him, and us pushing him, from a coach-player relationship. He and I have had some knockdown battles, but I respect him so much, because he has stayed the course and he’s trying to do the right things. And our team has gotten better as a result of that.”

The Hawks have also gotten better as a result of Woodson. That should be rewarded, but it doesn’t look like it will be.”

niremetal

November 30th, 2009
11:45 pm

What is coaching but getting players to become the best they can be, then showing that on a nightly basis?

Once I see anyone on the Hawks do anything good on a nightly basis, I’ll say “my bad” and give Woody his due. But the only thing the Hawks are consistent at is inconsistency.

RLP

December 1st, 2009
12:23 am

It seems that for most of the people who contribute to this blog there can only be two viewpoints:

1.) Woody = COY
2.) Woody is the worst coach in the NBA.

I do not believe either to be true. I do not believe he has earned COY status. Far too often the offense is stagnant. But I also do not understand the constant drumbeat of those who call for his dismissal.

Neither side will be persuaded to change their point of view. I would prefer both sides to enjoy the run the Hawks are on at this time. The team is 7-3 in their last ten games. They have a chance to go on a nice little surge right now. The schedule is in their favor for the month of December. Why don’t both sides chill out and enjoy this month. The argument can resume in January.

blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith

December 1st, 2009
2:38 am

“The glass is Half Full” by Blonju

dear hawks bloggers,
many of you are compassionate hawks fans that provide well thought out analysis and heartfelt opinions about our hometown team. however, some of you have reverted to witless banter that exceeds the illogical-crazed-fan-limit. it seems with the untimely departure of our good friend, sekou smith, the hawks nest has turned into a bird bath of biblical proportions. we are 12-5 through 17 games, our team is once again ripe for a playoff run & our coveted beat writer has left us with a replacement who wouldn’t know the difference between the hawks and the falcons. granted, woody is battling between his old self and a COY-version of himself that i HAVE seen glimpses of (and keep in mind i virtually hate him); our team chemistry is superficial at best because joe looks like he’d rather be at the club half the time; and jeff teague might as well be acie law the fifth; but we have a promising group of guys in place to contend if healthy at the right time. we don’t NEED a center to win a title – keep in mind that tim duncan has been considered a PF most of his career and has 4 titles. Also, no one can forget detroit in 04. it’s time for ATLANTA FANS to start rooting for their team regardless of where we disagree with coaching or general management. i have to agree with mark bradley that this team is worth paying to see and regardless of what you think the Hawks should do next, remember that we are all rooting for WINS. Except for our disinterested, uninformative new beat writer, our glass should be considered “HALF-FULL.”

honest_abe

December 1st, 2009
3:50 am

so not even cool blonju.. while sekou was a good beat writer. the blog would go weeks at a time without an update. there’d be long stretches without an article. you can only rehash certain things so many times. i like what ken s. has brought so far. give him a chance.

as for the team. yes we’re 12-5.. but we’re 1-3 in our last 4 and have looked extremely mediocre for the past two weeks. the hawks are neither title contenders or the worst in the nba. they are a solid team with a weak coach. they’ll finish 4th at best unless woody really screws up. in the meantime we can continue fighting over minutes.. heh

Grandad

December 1st, 2009
7:19 am

b aka tgoss:
Agreed, mostly, T.Duncan was a center in reality and a legiimate
7 ft. also Det. had B. Wallace a true center [def. presence] regardless of size. Most on here are true Hawk fans and yes we belly-ache about this and that, but we are discussing the team. Would you not prefer fussin’ and debating as opposed to apathy. Isn’t this more fun than a blank blog. Would you come on here to see everyone say go Hawks …
rah rah. Nah, you don’t want that. Norm Sloan [NC State] told this story: “we had David Thompson, Monte Towe and Tom Burleson(7′4); we went undefeated and won the Nat.Championship.” A fan was overheard just after the Nat.Champ. game “you know, we had a great season – but just think how good we could have been if we just had Dean coaching this team.” Fans > You gotta love us! Go Hawks rah rah!

Fundamentals

December 1st, 2009
8:06 am

Whether folks like the stuff on this blog or not there are alot of names & alot of comments. This translates into alot of interest and alot of buzz for our team. Folks actually admitting in print their daily Hawks fans. Impressive in my mind.

I too wish Ken would post articles. I don’t think we’ll ever get any insight from him until he becomes a fan that knows our team. Right now he’s just clipping comments from post game interviews. Fans watch those interviews – that’s not new information. We want real insight on our team. Daily insight if possible, but we realize the Hawks may not be his passion. Might just be a part time job he’s passing through instead of his ticket to the national stage like Sekou.

One more day till we hopefully hand out a beat down.

ILL-logical

December 1st, 2009
8:25 am

First, for all of you posters who are waiting on a regular beat writer for this blog : haven’t you been following the news? The newspaper indusrty is dying, employees are jumping/ being pushed out at Cox /AJC faster than a wedding dress at Filenes Basement on sale day. And you know tthat in the southern pantheon of sports pro basketball is ranked just above cricket ,barely. Net net: appreciate what we have while we have it ’cause it ain’t going to be here long.

Second, the good news is that the Hawks are wininng but many of us want more. Well, people in the netherworld probably could use a cold one but…. . Le’t continue to vent our spleen but remember that three years ago we would not no we could believe that the hawks would be where they are today. The team will improve albeit gradually but when the changes come remember that you sometimes should be careful what you pray for.

Dap01

December 1st, 2009
8:27 am

We signed Collins, yet we did not even let him attempt to throw his big body against Howard. Not even once. Al was horrible that game, ZaZa was ineffective.

Woody is like a turtle, if things get rough, he pulls back into his shell.

Daniel

December 1st, 2009
8:30 am

RLP- I loved your post. It was mature and reasonable. Therefore, it has no place on this blog. Man, we are having debates like this in the middle of summer; it is just what we do.

Fundamentals

December 1st, 2009
8:32 am

Very true, very true. We should’ve seen Collins bang and Randmo at least go in and foul Ben or Dwight. Neither can shoot free throws. Seems Joe Smith is only going to be used at PF. Woody needs to expand past 6.5 men in the rotation.

Fundamentals

December 1st, 2009
8:33 am

Now’s when you start thinking about Siler just going in with the orders “Clog the middle! Just get in his way!”

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
10:13 am

DAP01-your analogy of Woodson when he encounters the slightest adversity is dead on. This is the same scenario we faced last season after our season opening 6gm winning streak. We started out running, attacking the basket and playing solid DEF. Then for some unknown reason, he reeled in the OFF and forced the team to play WOODY BALL. And just like now, our PPG average, pts in the paint, fastbreak pts, rebounding, shooting percentage and number of wins suffered.

RLP-With me, it’s not a matter of Woodson being the worst coach in the NBA. That’s just too subjective. It’s a matter of him possibly being the worst coach for the Hawks, particularly at this juncture. I equate Woodson with former Falcons HC Marion Campbell. He coached the Falcons(twice) and the Eagles. As a DEF Coordinator he was outstanding, and his DEF’s always ranked 1st, 2nd or 3rd in the NFL in total DEF. But when given the responsibilities of being the HC, who has the responsibilities of overseeing the entire operation, he just wasn’t up to the task.

When you hear Woodson make statements like, he doesn’t pay much attention to OFF, and you see him refuse to use his bench, make equitable distribution of mins, give little effort to develop younger players, and plays his veterans into the ground, expecially early in the season, you know he’s not up to the task of handling the full responsibilities of being the HC of a young, talented, deep, versatile, athletic, uptempo style team like the Hawks.

How many quality NBA HC’s do you think would stand or sit on the sidelines with arms folded and allow a young extremely gifted and unbelieveably athletic PF to float around the perimeter and shoot ill advised 3pt shots, or the SG to consistently dominate the ball and the OFF with ISO’s and one on one play, especially when he’s playing poorly and hurting the team?

How many quality HC’s can you name would reward this behavior by increasing the playing time of these players, rather than correcting their behavior by pulling them out of the gm everytime they pulled those stunts. He certainly doesn’t have any problem doing that with rookie and/or less experienced PG’s/SG’s.

Sautee

December 1st, 2009
10:21 am

Grandad,

about this:

Sautee:

“Big Al second best [5] in the East.
I would still love to see him get PT @ the [4].
I would still love to see us get a def. minded [5].
Big Al would still be my favorite Hawk.”

I agree wholeheartedly. Astro Joe and I have said it for two years now. Of course, Woody would have to get that player off the bench and in the game, or it wouldn’t do any good. ;-)

Grandad, mostly I get bugged about the total hypocrisy of those saying “We’re 12-5, so you Woody bashers should STFU” while at the same time you NEVER hear “We’re 12-5 so Horford must be doing his job well”. No, what you hear is how we STILL need a center, and won’t compete with the “big boys” until we have one. I guess they averted their eyes when we beat Boston IN Boston.

Horford is 23 years old and as you said is arguably the second best center in the East. His scoring numbers could certainly be higher if he were given more touches. He’s 7th in the league in FG% among centers, even though he shoots a LOT more jumpers than any of the 6 ahead of him. And he makes great decisions with the ball, as his 2.0 assists per game shows. As I said in the off season, I’d run the offense through him every third time down the court (not counting fast breaks, obviously).

i_am_soulstar

December 1st, 2009
11:20 am

“That’s going to happen some nights. I’m not watching the minute-by-minute when I play guys,” Woodson said. “It’s who I think is getting it done and can help us. That’s how I try to coach.”

Ok Woody, just so I’m clear, Mo Evans gets in the game for 5 minutes and gets 2 defensive stops, and you pull him out in favor of a terribly performing Joe Johnson who’s shooting an abysmal percentage and getting owned on the defensive end by Rodney Stuckey and Will Bynum. And you call that ‘getting in done?’ Even a church league coach could see that Joe was a liability in that game by late in the 2nd half. So many other guys could have come in and contributed, especially on the boards. How do you not make adjustments, and just continue doing what you did in the first half? Now I see why Solo left for a worse team.

Believe in your bench Woody. You not only make yourself look bad, you make Hawks fans look bad.

i_am_soulstar

December 1st, 2009
11:27 am

trying hard not to hop on the fire Woody train, but he’s making it even harder

GET A NEW BEAT WRITER

December 1st, 2009
11:44 am

CAN WE PLEASE GET A NEW BEAT WRITER?

THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. THERE ARE NO NEW BLOGS EXCEPT FOR THESE HALF-ASSED SCOUTING REPORTS THE GUY PROBABLY COPIES AND PASTES FROM NBA.COM. HE DOESN’T COMMENT ON HIS OWN “BLOGS” (IF U CAN EVEN CALL THEM THAT), AND DOESN’T TRAVEL WITH THE TEAM. LOL

CAN WE GET MARK BRADLEY? EVEN IF HE IS AN ARROGANT JERK, HE KNOWS HOW TO WRITE.

GOD. DAMN. IT.

Daniel

December 1st, 2009
12:01 pm

GANBW- Man, calm down. Ken is just here on a temporary basis. He actually has listened to the bloggers and asked question of the team and coach based on our comments. The AJC needs to get the Hawks a beat writer for sure, but really is your life that significantly affected by the blog that you have to type in all caps and take the Lord’s name in vain?

Why don’t you write a blog and post it on here?

Drewcat

December 1st, 2009
12:05 pm

Where do I apply to become the new beat writer???

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
12:11 pm

SOULSTAR-I’ve complained about Woodson’s coaching hangups longer and louder than probably anyone, yet I didn’t get on the FIRE WOODY bandwagon. I simply wanted him to overcome his hangups and improve his coaching skills to mirror the teams organic improvement. This is the 2nd consecutive season we’ve seen the team start out playing the way we did the 1st 13gms of this season. It’s also the 2nd consecutive season we’ve seen Woodson grap the reigns and force the team to revert back to playing WOODY BALL, with the same predictable results.

YOU CAN’T TEACH THIS OLD DOG ANY NEW TRICKS, AND IF YOU CAN’T TEACH HIM NEW TRICKS, HOW IN THE HELL IS HE GOING TO TEACH NEW TRICKS TO ANYONE ELSE. As a result, I’m not only getting on the FIRE WOODY BANDWAGON, I’m going to sit next to CLYDE and help him drive the damn thing.

Woodson and his coaching hangups and stubborness have reduced what was a rebounding, attacking, fastbreaking, OFF powerhouse, that was turning it around on DEF, into a rebounding, jumpshooting, halfcourt, ISO, one on one, OFF/DEF weakling.

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
1:17 pm

niremetal
November 30th, 2009
4:37 pm
My point is more that the criticisms hurled at JJ and Jamal seem to be based on a conception that they should be doing thing that usually are expected of the coach rather than the players – ie we’re expecting them to create a ball-movement oriented offensive system out of a “system” that instead focuses on creating isolation and other one-on-one plays. That seems to me a wildly misplaced criticism.
criticisms hurled? wildly misplaced criticism. Lol funny. Settle down son. JJ shotting 3-8 and 5-19 took place in the same system. 3-8 anyone can take. 5-19 will and did cost us the game. Nothing hurled or wildly misplaced. Just a fact.
I have seen great ball movement and great teamwork this year in the ” “system” that instead focuses on creating isolation and other one-on-one plays.”

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
1:18 pm

December 1st, 2009
10:21 am
Horford is 23 years old and as you said is arguably the second best center in the East. His scoring numbers could certainly be higher if he were given more touches. He’s 7th in the league in FG% among centers, even though he shoots a LOT more jumpers than any of the 6 ahead of him. And he makes great decisions with the ball, as his 2.0 assists per game shows. As I said in the off season, I’d run the offense through him every third time down the court (not counting fast breaks, obviously).
You would think we would get the rock to a young player off to such a good start.

JeJe

December 1st, 2009
1:20 pm

It’s who I think is getting it done and can help us. That’s how I try to coach.”

Does that basically mean that out of his big 6, he chooses among them?

Tough choice, choosing between Bibby and Craw on who will play the whole 4th!

It’s obvious the guy is trying to get as many wins as possible and not caring about the long-run. Any coach worth a squirt of piss could get 45+ wins out of 35+ mpg from the starters

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
1:21 pm

GET A NEW BEAT WRITER

December 1st, 2009
11:44 am
CAN WE PLEASE GET A NEW BEAT WRITER?

Go to the nest or peach tree hoops if you do not like what you see. Two very good writers.

RLP

December 1st, 2009
1:33 pm

Ken Strickland:

You have made your point over and over and over. We know you are on the fire Woody bandwagon. The problem is that you use that viewpoint over and over and over again. We know how you feel. But what is the definition of someone repeating the same behavior over and over again and expecting different outcomes? I think people tend to see your name on the blog and then just skip what you have to say because you are only repeating yourself. I urge you to put a moratorium on posting fire Woody rhetoric until the first of the year. It is only a month. Is there nothing else about the Hawks that you can find to rant about?

I agree with you that the team is 1-3 for the past four games. You’ve warned of the dangers of a stagnant offense. We know that Woody has a special place in his heart for JJ. We know he does not develop young players who do not fit his preconceived ideas of what he wants. There is a choir who does listen to you. But those with an opposing viewpoint simply tune you out.

I know that you praised the team when it played the kind of basketball where the ball movement was good and fast breaks came on a regular basis. I know that you are a fan of the team. I know that you are frustrated when the team does not perform to the standards that you think are acceptable.

I am not asking you to stop your campaign on a long term basis. But I am challenging you contribute with a slightly different mindset for a few weeks. Be more than a one pony rodeo for a month. See what happens.

Mz. Hawkdafied

December 1st, 2009
1:43 pm

Woody= COY vs. Woody needs to be fired, huh? There are those of us on this blog that don’t fit either description and are in the middle.

Woody=COY means:

1. The Hawks won 60 or more games.
2. The Hawks ended up with the regular season record in the NBA.
3. The Hawks won the SE division.

Woody needs to be fired means:
1. The Hawks won less games than last season.
2. The Hawks fell below second place in the SE division.
3. The Hawks didn’t even go to the playoffs and fell down to the 5th-8th seed.

Now as a Hawks fan I would have to say I would rather Coach Woodson be COY than fired because it would mean the Hawks had a successful season and progressed even further than last season.

And to be honest and fair Coach Woodson has invested in the Hawks team just as much as anybody else that’s been around the past few seasons. He deserves to try to see his vision come to completion. There is no doubt the team is on the right track and headed towards the right direction. Sunday just showed the team what direction the team doesn’t want to go. We all need wake up calls and reminders. The loss to Detroit is just that.

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
2:31 pm

RLP-it appears you are a very sensitive individual and my response to your post about Woodson obviously struck a nerve. I say that because you seem to have a problem only with me and my, as you put it, one trick pony message. Yet, you don’t seem to have any problems with those one trick ponies who constantly lavish praise on Woodson no matter what, and/or those who are obcessed with spewing negative comments about MWilliams or JJ. IS IT BIRDS OF A FEATHER?

I like to take multiple approaches to whatever point I’m trying to make. I use a combination of deductive reasoning, informed opinions, guess work, facts and statistics to make my points. When you’re dealing with individuals that find it hard to accept certain aspects of someone or something they prize, value or support, often beyond reason, it takes more effort and information to get your point across. I won’t apologize for that, nor will I stop making my points.

You obviously got my point, but to think that holds true for everyone else is being presumptious on your part. It never ceases to amaze me how someone can be far more concerned about, or offended by, someone commenting on Woodson’s consistently inconsistent coaching, but not his actual consistently inconsistent coaching. This is a free blog, so feel free to scroll past my name. Trust me, I won’t be offended. Your last suggestion was well taken. I’ll change my tune when Woodson changes his and allows the team to go back to what made them so dominant earlier in the season. Then, I’ll go back to making the positive comments about him, his coaching and the team, like you acknowledged in your comments.

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
2:52 pm

Ken,

We disagree on many things but I like your posts. If we all agreed, it would get pretty slow around here.

Bi Ump

December 1st, 2009
2:52 pm

Been around sports a very long time and also on the inside. But this the first time that I have heard that a quality HC have to coach with his arm not folded. Some of these things blogger’s post is very amazing. Truth Serum I think I’m going to to use the Big Ray rule also. It’s no problem that you disagree with how the HC not doing the job that you want him to do. But when that’s all you talk about then it get very old. No matter is the Hawks won 7 straight or lost 7 straight you always know when you see the 4 Bloggers name what there post is about without reading their post. It’s a lot of people on thi blog who disagree with others but don’t go the extreme like the Bubba Posses. Most of the bloggers give credit both ways and don’t get angry that people disagree with them like the President of the Bubba Crew. You know who it is don’t you?

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
2:59 pm

Bret LaGree
http://www.hoopinionblog.com/?gcid=C12289×022&gtkw=Hoopinion

Bret breaking it down. Good reading for hawk fans over the last couple of games.

RLP

December 1st, 2009
3:49 pm

Ken Strickland:

I think you are a fine, articulate spokesman for your point of view. But I repeat – As Albert Einstein said – The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results.

I have singled you out only after I have made a number of posts asking all bloggers to tone down the rhetoric concerning this particular issue. There are plenty of those on this blog who are just as outspoken in their viewpoint of applauding the man as you are in your opposition. But the reason I singled you out was to use you as an example. Maybe some of those supporters might also reduce the noise level is you were to set an example.

On the issue of Woody I think Mz. Hawkdafied had it about right. There really are three differing points of view. She outlined the criteria which will allow one side or the other to claim victory at the end of the season if either scenario occurs. But I do not expect either scenario to occur If the Hawks were to win 60 games it would set a franchise single season winning record. Do I believe that will occur? No. I am sure you do not either. But I also do not believe the Hawks will fall into any of the criteria Mz. Hawkdafied set to get him fired for incompetence. So we will probably find ourselves somewhere in the range where they win more games than they did last year but also not becoming a champion. So what will that say about their coach? I believe your argument will have more resonance at that point in time than it will if you continue to use every negative thing during the season to cast aspersions on his ability. The same thing will be true for your opposites.

When the decision time comes I would hope that Mr. Sund or whoever he must consult with will try to make a rational decision based on as many factors as they can gather and with the best resources they have available to them. There are factors arguing in his favor and there are factors against him. There is something to be said for the ownership group showing the patience to allow this team to have the organic growth that you have spoken of and for which may have belittled. I prefer to speak of a growing level of maturity. Right now for example, Marvin Williams, is another example of one factor that needs to be evaluated. He is the fifth option on offense. No plays are run for him. He is consigned to the perimeter. He is losing PT to JC. Let us hope that Mr. Sund has heard of the criticisms about MW and makes a basketball judgment on his future that is based on realistic criteria rather than some of the unrealistic suggestions made on this blog. If my reference to a one trick pony offended you I certainly do apologize. It was not my intent to demonize you over all of the other posters whose viewpoint narrows to such a level.

I guess I need to address the issue of asking for a small moratorium on negativity. I realize that the blog is a place where fanatics can come and blow off steam when they are dissatisfied about the outcome of their favorite team’s fortunes. I am not trying to silence that need. What I am trying to suggest is that you can continue to do so and remain within the bounds of comity. There are issues that will be raised based on that lack of comity that need to just be overlooked.

I am not trying to discourage anyone from posting whatever you wish if it satisfies some need you have or is an outlet for frustration. Far better to voice your complaints here than other means of expression that could be much more harmful to the objects of your dissatisfaction.

ILL-logical

December 1st, 2009
4:44 pm

Woodson is now quoted in the ajc as saying that he doesn’t pay attention to minutes he just plays whom ever is playing well. Hmmm.
If I recall correctly, before the season started he was saying that he was not going to burn his starters out as he admitted to doing during the 2008-09 season. What gives?

Sautee

December 1st, 2009
5:09 pm

Ill,

He also said that he’d like all the free agents back (Bibby, Zaza, and Marvin) and he’d like Sund to tweak the bench. I’m not sure why, since he seems unwilling to USE the bench very much.

As you said, hmmmmm.

Rod from College Park

December 1st, 2009
5:23 pm

IF Woodson only played who was playing well then Marvin would stay glued to the bench. That is not a true statement from Mr. Woodson.

msubearfan

December 1st, 2009
5:51 pm

That Detroit game was garbage. I was hoping this team was going to take it to another level this season, but I’m not so sure after that one. No excuse to look that bad against that team with so many guys out. It’s been ugly ball since halftime of the Magic game.

What’s up with Zaza of late? When he checks in you know one thing is about to happen- a moving screen and waste of possesion.

Marvin needs to get confidence in the jumper. He passed up a corner three and instead darted out of control to the hoop and you could see the charge coming from the time he took his first dribble.

JJ is a good player, but he has not been good of late when we clear out for him and it’s up to him to create a shot. He’s dribbling off his feet all over the place and forcing up bad shots. Gotta trust his teammates. I’d rather see us try to run a real offensive set late in games than the JJ iso. I’d feel better about giving Crawford the ball if thats what we are going to do.

This team is at its best when it is creating turnovers and running as well as rebounding and pushing the ball. I think we could use another shooter for halfcourt sets. In the Houston game when we got down, we cranked up the D and that led to easy transition baskets. It just didnt seem like we could get to that same level of intensity on the road but until the halfcourt offense improves we need to find a way.

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
5:59 pm

RLP-You demonstrated a very high degree of intelligence and articulation in the way you presented you comments to me, and trust me, that didn’t go unnoticed or unappreciated. You stated: “THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS TO DO THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND EXPECT DIFFERENT RESULTS”. Well, isn’t that exactly what I’ve been complaining about, along with a number of others, about Woodson and his coaching issues?

You also stated: “ON THE ISSUE OF WOODY, I THINK MZ. HAWKDAFIED HAD IT ABOUT RIGHT. THERE REALLY ARE THREE DIFFERING POINTS OF VIEW”. One is for, one is against and one is rather neutral, which appears to be your position. My problem with you is you’ve chosen to single out 1 of the approaches, which appears to be the one that’s most opposed to yours, designated me as the representative of that approach, and you’re trying to apply a subtle type of censorship.

I can understand you wanting to censor the vulgarity and nastiness that’s prevalent among certain uncivilized and disturbed bloggers. However, to try and limit someone from expressing their opinions simply because they’re being presented too often for your taste is a whole lot worse.

There’s an old saying, “AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION IS WORTH A POUND OF CURE”. While some of you are willing to defer your judgement of Woodson’s overall coaching abilities, I’m not. In high school, I was taught to reward effort over results. It’s like a high school senior that brings home an A in English. The parents are so excited about the results(the A)they’re oblivious to the fact their little A student has difficulty correctly putting a decent sentence together.

Too many Hawk fans are so enamored with whatever positive results the team can get, after yrs of frustration, they are oblivious to the fact our HC has some serious flaws that’s actually preventing the team from doing much better.

cp

December 1st, 2009
6:03 pm

Its sad that guys are creating multiple names just so they can co-sign their own post and make convos with themselves.

Doc made a great point a few blogs back. We started off great last season then only played a few games over .500 for the rest of the year. I wouldn’t be shocked if that happens this year. I’m seeing the same problems from last year after we started out hot happen again this year.

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
6:09 pm

ILL-LOGICAL/SAUTEE- That’s exactly why I included him being a lier in my earlier posts. He’s done a complete 180 on just about everything he promised he’d improve upon at the beginning of the season. And you’re correct, he started his, and the teams, transformation after halftime of the Orlando gm, and we’ve been playing WOODY BALL and playing poorly every since.

Man, I hope Woodson wises up and gets this team turned around. I have to agree with MZ. HAWKDAFIED. I’d rather see him earn COY than get fired. I want this to be a statement yr for the Hawks.

blonju aka the ghost of sekou smith

December 1st, 2009
6:11 pm

you gotta love him or hate him, but Ken Strickland for NEW HAWKS BEAT WRITER!!

Clyde

December 1st, 2009
7:01 pm

Yes Ken Strickland for NEW BEAT WRITER!!!!!

Clyde

December 1st, 2009
7:26 pm

I remember when Ken Strickland would snap on me for saying FIRE WOODY. I’m amazed at how far he’s come in such little time.

Melvin

December 1st, 2009
8:26 pm

Look who top NBA.com for best offseason acquisition. I know somewhere Astro Joe is smiling….

http://www.nba.com/2009/news/features/shaun_powell/12/01/offseason.moves/index.html?ls=iref:nbahpt1

Truth-Serum

December 1st, 2009
8:30 pm

Bi Ump, I don’t sent much giving space to the foolishness that permeates this blog page. I’ll just hope for a better day and a higher quality of bloggers. I appreciate the cyber fist bump. You the man!

KevinA I disagree with your impression. I prefer Walter Cronkite over rush Limbaugh any day of the week. Bored is a state of mind. If you need tabloid journalism to be interested and motivated then….well….we all have our preferences. Just give me the truth, the facts with wisdom and courage. I’ll pass on the distorted, clownish, no intellectual disregard for the truth. My preference is for the sanely rational over the foolishly irrational.

RLP
December 1st, 2009
3:49 pm
Ken Strickland:
“I think you are a fine, articulate spokesman for your point of view. But I repeat – As Albert Einstein said – The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results.”

DITTO! It’s beyond sanity. I truly think he needs counseling. I’ve heard of beating a dead horse to death, but to bring him up from the grave and beat him some more is utter insanity. I don’t believe he can give it a rest or discuss relevant subjects. I think his record is hopelessly stuck in a scratched groove. Somebody change the record.

I can imagine how many true hawk fans have looked for another blog to nest their support at rather than to continue with the nagging continual drippings of one blogger’s nasal mucus. Dude, come up for air!

I think it’s rather maladjusted to think that just because you’re continuously regurgitating your negative impression of coach woodson it will make the hawks fans and supporters disregard the successes and accomplishments being bestowed on him by the professional analysts and the hawks’ successes. Right now the hawks have a great record, they are having a great season, and the city is excited for them. Woodson is ranked number 2 on the coach of the year poll. Josh, JJ, Bibby and Crawford are all having pretty good years. If they lose a minute or a quarter, have a two game and God forbid a 3 game losing street here comes the never ending mucus. I’d just like to enjoy the season, connect with fans who can appreciate it for the beauty of having a winning team in a city that’s hungry for a winner.

No KevinA. I don’t agree with you. There’s a better and more intriguing story here than tabloid negativism. I’d rather subscribe to the” let’s go hawks! Let’s go hawks! LET’S GO HAWKS!” Cadence. I prefer it over the let me tear you down to make myself look good politics of hate journalism.

Just one bloggers view.

Truth-Serum

December 1st, 2009
8:37 pm

Typical hawk hater’s blog.

Fire that gott damm@#$^##$%*^#$@! woodson! mudder fck woodsons$#$#%&^%&^ASE@%@#$%%%^%Fire that gott damm@#$^##$%*^#$@! woodson! mudder fck woodsons$#$#%&^%&^ASE@%@#$%%%^%Fire that gott damm@#$^##$%*^#$@! woodson! mudder fck woodsons$#$#%&^%&^ASE@%@#$%%%^%Fire that gott damm@#$^##$%*^#$@! woodson! mudder fck woodsons$#$#%&^%&^ASE@%@#$%%%^%. AZZHOLE!

play teague. Good luck aZzhole woodson. go hawks.

Truth-Serum

December 1st, 2009
8:42 pm

Clyde

December 1st, 2009
7:26 pm

I remember when Ken Strickland would snap on me for saying FIRE WOODY. I’m amazed at how far he’s come in such little time.

I feel you Clyde. I heard this disease regresses rapidly and is highly contagious. Have you had a check up lately?

Im going to have “Bi Ump” moment of silence in vigil that you might get better. Dont give up. Try to remember sanity. Click your heels together three times and say “Go hawks, Go hawks, Go hawks!”

Truth-Serum

December 1st, 2009
8:44 pm

*I don’t sent much correction.

I don’t spend much time giving space

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
8:47 pm

CLYDE-you said it brother. In fact, DOC once had to come down on me in his diplomatic way for going after you so harshly for criticizing Woodson. A large number of the current bloggers haven’t been on these blogs long enough to know that in the early going, I was one of Woodson’s biggest advocates and possibly your biggest adversary.
Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.

When it comes to change, adjustments, strategy and consistency, he’s stuck in neutral, or consistently inconsistent. That’s when I jumped off the SUPPORT WOODY bandwagon and am now officially on the FIRE WOODY bandwagon. What we’ve seen from the team, and the way it’s played over the last 4.5gms is nothing new. We’ve all seen it before, and those of you trying to pretend what’s happening is just an aberration are in denial and burying your collective heads in the sand. WE’VE SQUEEZED ALL OF THE JUICE WE CAN GET OUT THIS WOODY ORANGE.

Truth-Serum

December 1st, 2009
8:48 pm

*losing streak
*Woodson is ranked number 2 on the coach of the year poll. Josh, JJ, Bibby and Crawford are all having a pretty good year.

Stop the madness! 2010 !

December 1st, 2009
8:51 pm

“Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.”"Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.”"Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.”"Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.”"Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.”

Some body help me kill this dead azz horse!

The resurrected dead horse from "yrs ago"

December 1st, 2009
8:59 pm

“We talked a little bit and shared some philosophies and things like that,” Sund said. “Next week at this time, it might be a more appropriate question. But today I can’t answer it.”

Woodson’s contract is up at the end of the month, and a dismal record of 106-222 (.323) would appear to make him a prime candidate for unemployment.

But the Hawks have made steady progress during his four years, going from a franchise-worst 13-69 in his debut to 37-45 this season, good enough for the final playoff spot in the Eastern Conference. Woodson’s prospects were further enhanced when Atlanta took the heavily favored Boston Celtics to seven games in the opening round before losing.

“One of the things I liked about Atlanta was they had a game plan,” Sund said. “It’s not always easy to stick with the game plan, to go through the highs and lows of playing the younger players and developing them. Most teams are into that instant gratification. Some of it came to fruition this year and they were able to say, ‘Hey, this team is pointed north.’ That’s a good thing.”

Ken Strickland

December 1st, 2009
9:26 pm

MADNESS-this dead horse has obviously gotten under your skin, which is reason enough for me to keep beating that dead horse!

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
9:34 pm

Truth-Serum,

Your sanity is another’s madness. Like needing a center, getting rid of Marvin, fire Woody, bench JJ on off nights, play Teague more, Josh shooting threes, our guards can’t guard their guards, PT for bench etc. All are examples of opinion. What you call keeping it real is your real, not my real. Lots of different versions of real out there.
I am older and have no problem with diversity of opinion.

What is more interesting is that in spite of all of our warts we are winning. Shows our tremendous upside potential if we solve even half our problems.

The Dept. of Unintended Irony

December 1st, 2009
9:36 pm

The same person who posted this:

“I don’t spend much time giving space to the foolishness that permeates this blog page. I’ll just hope for a better day and a higher quality of bloggers.”

Also turned around and posted THIS:

“Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.””Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.””Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.””Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.””Most of the same issues I’m currently complaining about have been the same issues I started to see from him yrs ago.”

“Some body help me kill this dead azz horse!”

AND THIS:

“I think his record is hopelessly stuck in a scratched groove. Somebody change the record. ”

Ah, yes.

Irony.

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
9:38 pm

NBA TV

They think Josh has exellent chance of DPOY. Maybe making All-Star game.

KevinA

December 1st, 2009
9:40 pm

Nicks up 108-81 over PHX. LOL wow

MsDee

December 1st, 2009
10:18 pm

I say what good is it to play big and win games against the elite teams but looks like boo-boo against the lesser teams?? I just dont understand!! I understand we cant and will not win all 82 games but there is 0/zero excuse as to why we didnt play the defense that we displayed in the earlier games or why we didnt pass the ball and get team assits like we did before. I know, I know Woodson has been here since we were 13-69 and all but as a coach, he should have prepared his team better, to get their minds focus on the team they are about to play and not have them assume they are just going to run over a team who has 3 missing scorers on the sidelines. If we are going to be an elite team, we must ALWAYS…ALWAYS play like one, weither win or lose!!

Grandad

December 1st, 2009
11:12 pm

A different wrinkle on a “dead horse”:
Title – “I Would buy a ticket to see these Hawks play” [paraphrase] Mark Bradley column; written after our first half dozen or so games.
His point: the/our Hawks are/were exciting and fun to watch.
Wrinkle: fans and or attendence and loud,lively support for the team.
There has been mounting concern (including theories explaining) about att.figures and filling the arena. I would imagine this is a prime concern of the ASG.
My point: which is really Ken Strickland’s point [style/system/philosophy/and his change thereof]; which product are fans most likely to purchase tickets? I refer back to Mark Bradley’s column. Are the Hawks currently as fun and or exciting to watch as they were, say the first 10, 12 games. Some will say this [current streak] is only a microcosm and we will get back to the style with which we started the season. Realistically, these games now more accurately reflect the style/system with which mr.w.’s players have been endoctrinated.
Next pt: I reckon Mr. Sund might just take all this into acct. on his decision to extend/replace mr.w. and when.
Just sayin’.

niremetal

December 1st, 2009
11:43 pm

As an aside, Grandad, Mark Bradley hasn’t posted on the Hawks since then. He posts about 8 articles on Tech/UGA Football, 8 on the Falcons, and 9 on the Braves for every 1 article that he posts about the Hawks (and the handful of Hawks pieces he does write are almost always bunched in at the beginning and end of the season).

Considering that he has an AJC expense account that would allow him to attend and watch Hawks games for free but still barely even talks about the Hawks during the regular season, I find it ironic that he wrote an article talking about how he’d pay to watch them.

Truth-Serum

December 1st, 2009
11:50 pm

KevinA, as usual I appreciate you and both the difference and likeness of our views,(im speaking to you personally). Yes, Ive on occasion posted on the hawks need for a center. Its a point that is documented. I havent posted on the other issues you offer:. getting rid of Marvin, fire Woody, bench JJ on off nights, play Teague more, Josh shooting threes, our guards can’t guard their guards, PT for bench etc. Ill just chalk up your erroneous assertion in this case a blog fatigue.

There is a difference in diversity of opinion, and fanatical obsession.

You may or may not be older, I cant say whether your assertion in this case is erroneous or not.
I can and do appreciate a diversity( The fact or quality of being diverse; difference.
A point or respect in which things differ.) Im not sure that the presentation being demonstrated by the Rush Limbaugh of this blog site qualifies as diversity. You are entitled to your opinion, and I respect the diversity your opinion offers. Once again, we respectfully disagree.

“What is more interesting is that in spite of all of our warts we are winning. Shows our tremendous upside potential if we solve even half our problems” – KevinA

Kevin once again, I don’t agree with you hear. I think the hawks are play at or near their peak. They, haven’t , cant, and wont, crest the big three with out a center. If the hawks win 6 out of every 10 games they will certainly have an excellent winning pct.
But what is the winning percentage is against the top three teams, who, have one thing the hawks don’t, a center, thats what really matters in the grand scheme of things.

City of Atlanta – Mayor
100% OF PRECINCTS REPORTING
Kasim Reed 45,158 50%
Mary Norwood 44,533 50%

KevinA

December 2nd, 2009
12:05 am

NBA power ranking

Orlando – 81 million
PHX – 75
Lakers – 91
Boston – 81
Denver – 75
Atlanta – 65
Clev – 82
Dallas – 89
Utah – 82

10 – 26 million more in salary by every team with a better or equal record. Must mean Woody = COY.

The Hawksta

December 2nd, 2009
12:06 am

Home on the range! Where bullets fly cowboys die! Ride or die Hawks fans! Thou shall dawn the capes of heroes, bring faith upon those who are faithless. Swat those faceless bloggers carrying mighty swords! Words! Cursing the weak! Speak truth fans! Stand up for Stan! For our seasons, last longer than horses feeding on green grasses of summer! Wonder aloud! Proud of your city, pity the wity… for he/she speaks fast, yet wisdom slow. Whoa be the annointed one… one who chooses to loosen this strangle hold hath thou fellow blogger upon thee! The meek shall suffer the crowded opinions of the masses! MADNESS I SAY… Hast not this judgement poison thee… or has it? Demand that accountability be placed responsibly! The cost of victory brightly demonstrated on many fronts, the totality not lost on moral wins brought upon by a teams maturity. But judge upon by complacency in loses! Oh yes the cost is steep my friend! Lie in your accomplish past, as I open the vaults of your faults! Pressured not by few! But those of due deligence! Who went against your resistance to change! WOODY WE HAVE A PROBLEM! USE YOUR BENCH!!!!

GO HAWKS!!!!!!

KevinA

December 2nd, 2009
12:12 am

Truth-Serum,

With an extra 25 million maybe we could have Bosh instead of ZaZa. Chills instead of Evans and a Guard that can play defense.

You may know the old saying, if buts and ifs were cherries and nuts – we would all have a merry Christmass.

Truth-Serum

December 2nd, 2009
12:14 am

KevinA whether that means woodson is the COY or not we wont know until later in the season. what it does mean is that hes getting the most bang for the buck. I can only interpret that as doing a good job, something the silent majority already know. Maybe that’s why hes # 2 on the poll. I can only imagine how high wed be flying if we had Lopez (the only legit center available).

Great post KevinA. Good vision.

Truth-Serum

December 2nd, 2009
12:19 am

True Kevin. I’m not a bosh man. he too soft for my style of play. Id trade Lopez for horford head up and keep zaza. or Trade, zaza, collins and Maurice for Lopez Make lopez the started and horford backing up josh and lopez.

Of course if a frog had a glass azz every time hed jump……hed break it!

RLP

December 2nd, 2009
12:25 am

Ken Strickland:

Sorry for the delay in responding to your last post but I was out.I am not asking you quit crusading for Woody’s dismissal. There may come a time when I join you in that mission. All I have requested you to do is to suspend your campaign for one month because I think at the end of December this team will have a chance to either prove or disprove how realistic their level of play has improved this year. I am also not asking you to stop criticizing his coaching. You can certainly criticize lack of ball movement, switching defense, increased playing time for starters, ISO Joe and other aspects of his coaching philosophy and build a case against him during this period of time. I am simply suggesting that you apply a different tactic for the month of December. Look at the schedule. Look at the analysis I submitted not too far back about my expectations during this period of time. See if you think they are unrealistic given Woody’s coaching style. I suggest that if you continue criticizing the aspects of his game that has confirmed in you a desire to get him fired then a change in tactics will make it much more difficult for his supporters to defend him. I have never said that I find your opinion distasteful. I have suggested that it may not be the most effective means of achieving the stated goal.

Finally if you criticize Woody for doing the same old thing over and over again and it proves to be true I will agree that Mr. Sund should find a lack of sanity in his approach. That does not excuse lack of sanity on your part.

Granddad:

I agree with you on Joe Caldwell. But there was another example on the Hawks team that moved to Atlanta that I think would be a more appropriate person for the current Hawks team to look at. In an era of Wilt Chamberlain, Walt Bellamy and Bill Russell the Hawks had a center who could be the role model for Al Horford. His name was Zelmo Beatty and he helped lead the Hawks to the second most season victories with 56 in 1967-68. Does your memory go back to then and how he played the 5?

Truth-Serum

December 2nd, 2009
12:42 am

RLP that team did not make it to the championship round either, that would have been the 76ers and the Celtics. Then was Chamberlain and russel, now its Howard and Shaq. I suspect the results will be the same. Hawks when a lot of game but not enough of a center to advance to the finals level.

Go post by the way.

Grandad

December 2nd, 2009
8:44 am

niremetal:
On M.B. I agree to a certain extent. Right now it is fb. season in a fb. state. I wrote a lengthy post on this topic several days ago but the dawg ate it. I’ll try again someday. But back on point!!! MB, I think, deep down is a basketball guy. [Ky. heritage] I went back and re-read the article and it was very good and he was effusive in his praise of the Hawks. My point (and I realize you saw my point) was many of the traits he saw in the Hawks early on, were exactly what K.S. has been preaching. Those same traits are now MIA. I would encourage all on this board to go back and read MB’s column in order to discern those Hawks (and the manner in which they were gettin’ it done) from our current state of the Hawks. It is a startling reversal in such a short period of time. A great Coach, nay, even just a very good Coach has a philosophy [foundation] and if his team violates his core value, then he quickly does ‘SOMETHING’ about it sooner than later. Once again I know that you get it. I also understood your aside. One other tidbit on MB. Was it not MB that got into the whole squabble with the sportscaster in Cleveland as he defended we Hawks fans during the playoffs ?

Grandad

December 2nd, 2009
9:23 am

RLP:
Yes, as a matter of fact, I have mentioned Z.Beaty on this board previously. I’m not very good at remembering exact yrs. etc. I was a young lad at the time. I mentioned Bells because ZB only played one yr. in Atl.[6-9,225].Probably would be a [4] today. Not much NBA on TV back in the day. I actually listened to the Hawks on the radio quite a bit. My favorite Skip Carey story: he said he knew he had arrived as a broadcaster when on one evening at the end of regulation he needed to relieve himself urgently. He was on the radio by himself (down front on press row). The Hawks went into 3 overtimes and Skip made good use of a coca cola cup. He said no one even noticed and he didn’t skip a beat.
Have you ever wondered what the fate, tradition, and perception of ‘our’ franchise would be now had we not traded Bill Russell?
I imagine alot on this board do not even realize the Hawks did that.
The Hawks might still be in St.Louis. Most, probably think that trading Nique or drafting Marv and Sheldon were the franchise’ biggest blunders. At the time trading a [just drafted] rookie for a 6 time
all-star and Cliff Hagan didn’t look so bad. Who knew BR would go down in history as one of the 3 or 4 best/greatest players of all-time.
For those of you who missed my point…cut Marvin some slack.

Clyde

December 2nd, 2009
9:31 am

Grandad that post made me shed a tear. The Hawks just might be cursed.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
9:44 am

Good to hear Mario West is in the D-League. Love the kid. I wish our Hawks would play with his effort & heart every night. If we did we’d easily win our division and net Woody COY. Will it really happen…we’ll see how well the boys have matured. In the end it falls on the players to grow up, play together and be professional every night. We’ve had a 5 game break. It’s time to get back on board!

The night and day nature of our team reflects #1 maturity and #2 professionalism. Should Woody use his bench to send a message – YES. Will he – NO! I pray he figures out the problem before next spring when we’re limping into the playoffs. Too many tools on the bench not to use them. I think we’re slacking because our starters are losing focus. They need a break. Using the bench would accomodate that.

KevinA

December 2nd, 2009
9:44 am

Right or wrong Woody is going to play his best players. When his best players go bad he will stick with them. I appreciate that he is not like Don Nelson. On the one hand you can say he is a control freak by not letting the bench play enough. On the other hand there is much trust built up in his system that if you make the holy grail of being a starter or the six man you will not get dumped by a couple or few bad games.

I will be the first to admit I love to arm chair coach. On the other hand I love his old school approach. If you are an NBA player and Woody is your coach you may not think life is perfect but you should know where you stand.

Unlike many, in spite of his warts, I like Woody. I also will continue to talk about his warts after every loss.

On the other hand if Woody is to get no credit in organic growth – give the ball to Josh and Al, they still go to growing to do.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
9:47 am

Marvin is not the biggest blunder. Wouldn’t that be Keefe, Priest, Koncack, Rumeal, McCloud….and the list goes on and on. At least Marvin played. We’ve got a solid history of drafting crap prior to this group.

Big Ray

December 2nd, 2009
9:52 am

Truth-Serum ,

I really hate to tell you this, but Brook Lopez is just NOT available, LOL! Nobody trades a legit 7-foot starting-caliber center. Not unless they have another one right behind him.

Not only that, but Lopez is on his rookie contract still (and New Jersey will no doubt pick up the 4th year option on his contract when the time comes), making him a true bargain.

Nah, dude. It ain’t gonna happen. You’ve a better chance at just becoming a Nets fan, I’m afraid.

Big Ray

December 2nd, 2009
9:54 am

KevinA ,

Knowing where you stand is one thing. Knowing your role is something else completely. I think I’ll just leave it at that.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
10:05 am

My off the cuff draft comment made me think about doing some draft research. Our last few years of picks were actually pretty good compared to the past. We griped and griped about Billy Knight, but in his defense, he got some good players. Did he pick the best each time? Maybe not, but overall it’s better than this esteemed list. While you read them – how many actually played in the league or logged any significant minutes. Marvin still has a chance to outperform most all the kids from his draft class. He just needs to find his niche in our system or be traded to somewhere he can flourish. To me he’s a better 2nd option in our 2nd unit, not a 5th in our 1st:

Cal Bowdler
Roshown McCloud
Ed Gray
Priest Lauderdale
Alan Henderson
Gaylon McKerson
Doug Edwards
Adam Keefe
Rumeal Robinson
Roy Marble
Dallas Comegys
John Contract

KevinA

December 2nd, 2009
10:31 am

Ray,

They know their roles,

Tell me if I am wrong, JJ is alfa dog, Jamal has become like Flip, respecting the alfa dog but knows he is not subservient and has the green light. Josh being the dominant big needs the ball from all the guards and has emerged as the second option. Bibby clearly has become the 4th option instead of last years second option, but as a good vet has played smart. Al and Marvin are in lala land and still trying to find their roles. They need the team and the team needs them but they don’t really care about being 5th or sixth option – they just want to contribute and be relevant.

The bench plays so little – why go on.

Spoken or un spoken – there is a pecking ordrer.

i_am_soulstar

December 2nd, 2009
10:32 am

Melvin,

that link to the nba.com article listing Jamal Crawford as the best offseason acquisition out of 15 is about to spark some I-told-you-sos from now until tip-off tonight.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
10:36 am

I think Jamal knows his role, but JJ might be trying to do too much to maintain his status as alpha. Josh and Al need the touches consistently to develop. The games we do that we win, others we use our “highpowered guards” to shoot us out of the game. It’s just like Orlando – without the inside game the perimeter shots don’t fall. Marvin’s odd man out every time.

Grandad

December 2nd, 2009
10:43 am

Funadamentals – I honestly think you and I share alot of the same ideas. ***But, my point was trading Bill Russell on draft night was the biggest blunder by a country mile and then some ! I actually like Marv and am of the persuasion that he did not pick himself #2. I also am certain that he is a system player and not a 1 0n 1 slasher.(which evidently someone is or has tried to make him into one) If Marv played for SA he would be terrific. There are others: Utah,LAL,etc.
Back to your post my personal favorite |worst| draft pick Cal Bowdler.
When we chose him I immediately said “who the heck is Cal Bowdler”.
Another note(even though it doesn’t make it any better)Gaylon Nickerson
was a 2nd round pick as we did not have a 1st round pick that yr.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
10:59 am

Definitely right on track with you Grandad. I just wish folks would quit focussing on how Marvin isn’t this or that. The kid has talent. He’s just under so much pressure to perform. Like you said, so much presssure to perform in a system that doesn’t work with him. We need his perimeter game and he can slash once his outside shot opens up the middle. I just don’t think he’ll develop here without something changing. I would like to see he, Crawford and Teague get some consistent minutes together along with Collins, ZaZa and Joe Smith as a solid second unit. I guess the only question is would Mo provide enough solid D and rebounding with the 1st team? Who else could we use there? I just think that would alleviate some of the pecking order on the 1st team while giving more power to the 2nd unit.

Too many drafts have I spent crying about WHO IS THAT! %#$%@#%! Maybe next year :( .

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
11:10 am

Do you think they’d move ZaZa, Smith or Collins to Center and move Josh to 3 and Al to 4 if we moved Marvin to the 2nd unit? Joe Smith has shown decent play, but ZaZa has been lackluster of late. Collins needs the opporunity to set his popcorn in the cupholder.

Ken Strickland

December 2nd, 2009
11:17 am

Are all of you Hawk fans as excited about the gm tonight, and the Hawks overall, as you were the first 12.5 gms of the season? Didn’t we have the same excitement last yr during our season opening 6gm winning streak, only to end up experiencing the same feeling of letdown we’re now feeling? Didn’t the team also experience a sudden switch in style of play, where we stopped playing the uptempo style of ball that led to the streaks, seemingly overnight, and started playing WOODY BALL?

CAN WE ALL SAY DEJA VU.

Where do we place the blame. Some believe it’s all MWilliams fault, or JJ’s fault, or the lack of a true center, or it’s Horford and/or Smoove playing out of position. Then some believe it’s just an abrerration, and we’ll return to our previous dominance if I keep quiet and pretend not to notice for the entire month of December. Some believe it’s Woodson’s coaching philosophy and his fanatical insistance on forcing the team to play his beloved WOODY BALL. In each case, the results of this style of play has always caused the team to be irratic, boring, inconsistent, and has caused friction among the players, with the HC, AND WE GENERALLY START LOSING.

I firmly believe the Hawks have been a losing franchise overall because both fans and management have been unwilling to demand excellence from the team and its owners. We’ve been content to accept the status quo. How many times have we read, BUT WE’RE WINNING, OR WE’VE INCREASED OUR WIN TOTAL EACH OF THE LAST 5 YR’s. Well, here are the facts:

(1)We have one of the NBA’s worst, if not the worst, won/loss records over the last 5yrs.

(2)We’ve had only one winning season in the last 5 yrs.

(3)We have no identity as a team. Are we the fastbreaking, uptempo, attacking, inside out team that’s started strong and gotten the attention of the NBA each of the last 2 seasons? Or, are we the halfcourt, ISO, one on one, guard dominated, perimeter oriented, jumpshooting team we suddenly become after each winning streak, that just as suddenly, can’t compete with below average losing teams?

If we fans complain enough and display our dissatisfaction with the way the team is being handled, or in this case, mishandled, maybe an AJC beat writer will make it known to someone in management, which might facilitate a change. I AM NOT GOING TO STAND BY QUIETLY, FOR ANY LENGTH OF TIME, AND ACCEPT MEDIOCRITY, OR THE STATUS QUO. I’M GOING TO DEMAND EXCELLENCE, OR AT LEAST AN ATTEMPT TO GET TO THAT LEVEL.

How many teams with winning traditions have fired HC’s with winning records? Their fans and management are striving for excellence. Woodson has been the Hawks HC for 5yrs, before this season. He has increased the number of wins each yr, he’s led the team to consecutive playoff appearances, and yet the powers that be haven’t seen fit to rate that worthy enough to annoint him COY or offer a contract extension. Why, because vitually every NBA HC could taken this team, after starting out with 13 wins, and increased the win total with the addition of new talent each yr. They also realized this team was dead in the water and going nowhere near the playoffs until Bibby arrived in 07/08. If anything, former GM BKnight deserves the credit for that. Woodson’s greatest achievement was his ability to keep the team focused and playing hard during the turbulent ownership mess and his issues with BKnight.

He’s obviously feeling the pressure brought about by some of his decisions and moves. Why else would he say he doesn’t pay attention to the OFF, or he doesn’t pay attention to mins. He doesn’t pay attention to developing rookie and young PG’s either. An assistant coach can make those kind of statements, because their responsibilities are limited. But to hear that crap from the HC, who’s responsible for every phase of the team, says it all. This is a man that’s wearing the title and welding the authority of a HC, but he’s thinking and approaching the job like he’s still a DEF coordinator.

Big Ray

December 2nd, 2009
11:20 am

KevinA ,

I hear you. But again, pecking order is not the same as knowing your role, anymore than “knowing where you stand with the coach” is.

What is Marvin’s role? He looks like he doesn’t have one, and doesn’t know what to do. Oh, we know where he STANDS as far as offensive option, but WHAT IS HIS ROLE? And don’t tell me fifth option on offense. That’s only part of the story.

Marvin is the only one that seems lost, Horford doesn’t fit that category. He knows his role, it just changes from an offensive standpoint from game to game. Woody said he wants to get Al to a point where he’s getting roughly 13 points a game. Al knows his job is to defend and rebound. He knows his role, and it shows: 12.9 ppg, 9.9 rpg, 1.6 bpg.

Woody said they have to get Marvin more touches, get him more aggressive. Joe Johnson goes and says the exact same thing. Have you seen evidence of either? Marvin torched Houston for 29, and got 17 against New Orleans. That’s about it. He’s down in every single category except blocked shots and free throws. His defense is even down. Looks to me like his role has changed, and neither he nor Woodson have figured out to what. But it’s okay, because the team’s winning. Nevermind that 5 year, 37.5 million dollar contract. What is he supposed to be, the glue guy? How? Haven’t seen it.

But it’s all good, lol. He knows the pecking order and where he stands with the coach. His role? Who needs a role?

Grandad

December 2nd, 2009
11:27 am

KevinA – mr.w. is not an old school coach. That is disrepectful to those gentlemen who were not afraid of their players. Case in point,
fear of pulling/yanking/benching Joe. Two; argues with Josh. Old school coaches would never have engaged in open heated discussion with a subordinate. He (O.S.C.) also would have put Josh’s hind on the pine.
The same if Josh had continued to take low % shots against his wishes.
Sorry, he’s not an OSC to me, rather an insecure bully with very little discernable substance.
Along those lines; why does there have to be an Alpha dawg,1st,2nd,3rd and so on option? It is a team game. Establish an inside presence and after that pass it to the player that is the most open. Basketball is a simple game. Why does everyone complicate matters by trying to determine ahead of time who’s gonna shoot? Play to your strengths [K.S.has been on a torrent for weeks about where is our running game], not some ranking of who’s who on the Hawks. Alpha Joe couldn’t pee a drop v. Det. so give it up to Beta dawg. You say Josh is #2 option…what if a team allows Josh to shoot, leaves him open. They already do that from the perimeter, begging him to launch.[Josh doesn't shoot he launches]What about attacking a teams weaknesses,and on, and on, and on…
Sorry about the rant KevinA, it was most assuredly not directed at you.

Big Ray

December 2nd, 2009
11:38 am

Fundamentals ,

I’ve always argued that where a player is drafted says more about the organization and their scouting/expectations than it does about the player himself.

Having said that, I see what Marvin CAN do. The thing is, he doesn’t know what he’s SUPPOSED to do. Every player needs to know their role. A role is what you are supposed to do on a consistent basis. Obviously, Josh is our main scoring guy in the frontcourt, followed by Horford. Marvin is typically fifth option overall these days. Well fine, but you have to define the man’s ROLE. Tell him what you want. Do you want him to defend with tenacity, rebound hard, and hit the occasional open shot? That sounds like a defined role to me.

Instead, what I see is Marvin not doing any one thing consistently from game to game. And before some nimrod suggests it, I AM NOT PUTTING ALL OF THE BLAME ON WOODY.

Nobody should have to tell the guy to defend or rebound every game. He should know that already. And he’s 6′9″ and 245 for cryin’ out loud. Yet, the inconsistency is there. Why is that??? Between coach and player, something has gone awry. Define the man’s role, then hold him accountable for maintaining it.

Then, if need be, change it during games. If his scoring is needed, tell him to score, and demand that the other guys get him the ball. You know, like on those nights where Joe is shooting 5-19, does everything he can to find a double team to dribble into, and seems to want to set the record for number of dribbles in a 24-second period.

Ken Strickland ,

No, I do NOT feel a sense of Deja Vu. All of our guys are healthy, unlike last season.

Josh Smith is playing very smart, and very hard pretty much all the time, unlike last season.

We’re generally scoring without a problem (and running), unlike last season.

We have yet to lose more than two games in a row, unlike last season.

We beat Boston IN Boston, unlike last season.

We’re playing more games on the road, and have a winning road record, unlike last season.

Your sense of deja vu is not deja vu. It’s called “familiarity breeds contempt” and I might be going out on a limb here, but I think anybody who posts here can readily identify where your contempt lies.

I get a sense of deja vu every time you post. Seriously, man. Are you channeling HB Ando?

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
11:46 am

Definitley good commentary on Marvin. Defining his role is finding his niche. Early on the shots weren’t falling, but he was involved on D and on the boards. Lately he seems to drift into wondering why he’s on the court. Basketball is a team game. Teams get everyone involved. That’s when we start creaming people. This pounding and pecking isn’t Woody Ball. It’s selfish, losing ball.

Big Ray

December 2nd, 2009
11:56 am

Fundamentals ,

Exactly. And it’s the only way we beat the good/best teams.

Ken Strickland

December 2nd, 2009
12:08 pm

KEVIN A-I think your statement about a player knowing exactly where he stands with Woody is misleading. I’m certain Joe Smith, JCollins, RMorris and MEvans know where they stand now, but was that the case when they decided to sign with the team? Do you really think JCollins would have signed with us if he had any idea Woodson would give him the treatment he’s now receiving? What about Joe Smith, who refused to resign with Cleveland because of the same treatment he’s now receiving from Woodson. Do you think MEvans or RMorris will even give resigning with the Hawks a consideration after their contracts expire if Woodson is still the HC?

If you were a FA and figured you could help a team, after seeing what has happened to most of the rookies and FA’s under Woodson, would you sign with Atlanta and risk getting glued to the end of the bench, which definitely wouldn’t further your career or chances of getting another decent contract?

Isn’t it ironic, Woodson is rapidly damaging the chances of the teams ability to attract quality FA’s, and he’s totally against dealing with draft picks. I CALL THAT A CATCH 22, AND A DAMNED SHAME.

darrell starks

December 2nd, 2009
12:21 pm

Fundamentals we are on the way for something special here if where going 2 build on that i say trade marvin now before his value is gone,me i say lets go get andris biedrins right now before he come back and his value will be unable 2 get him unless we give more than just marvin.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

December 2nd, 2009
12:34 pm

Just like the laker went after pau gasol and won the title i say lets go after andris biedrins 2 make the hawks better.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

December 2nd, 2009
12:36 pm

STARTER BIBBY, JOE, JOSH, HORFORD, BIEDRINS.
BENCH TEAGUE, JAMAL, MOE, JOE SMITH, ZAZA.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Ken Strickland

December 2nd, 2009
12:42 pm

BIG RAY-Yes, this yrs team is a lot healthier than last yrs team, so far, and Smoove has improved tremendously. However, that really emphasizes my point, and illustrates how the sudden drop in the overall performances of last yrs and this yrs team, after getting off to strong starts, wasn’t manifested by injuries, player discord or development. After we matched Orlando bucket for bucket in the 1st half, it’s like Woodson flipped a switch and we started doing all of the things he said he’d change, and we’ve become an inconsistent, unmotivated, boring, noncompetitive team, like last yr. The DEJA VU is in reference to what seems to always happen to us after an extended winning streak. We don’t just lose a gm or two, we completely become a different team, in results as well as in style of play.

Whenever we’ve had an extended winning streak, we’ve played fastbreaking basketball and attacked the basket. I have no doubt Woodson appreciates the results, but he seems obcessed with trying to establish his own idenity, like his mentors BKnight and LBrown, and get those same results by forcing the team play his WOODY BALL. It seems when the team gets on a roll, he figures everything is going well, so he’ll take advantage of the teams momentum and make them switch to playing WOODY BALL, and that’s when everything comes to a scretching halt.

Unless the team continues to faulter, Woodson won’t be fired before the end of the season. This team is very talented, experienced, athletic, versatile and deep, and has shown it can win in spite of Woodson. So, I don’t think they’ll risk adding additional fuel to the fire by forcing the players to adjust to a new HC, especially if the person they might want to replace him with isn’t already on staff.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
12:45 pm

A solid center would be awesome…not to disrespect Horford, Al would be better at the 4 where he could be strong instead of getting beat down every night. I don’t think Horford can withstand that much pounding every night. Moving Smoove to the 3 with Horford at 4 would give us alot more lockdown power on D. Is Biedrins big enough at 240 6-11? The Lopez kid would be nice. I don’t think any team will part with someone like that. I always wonder about Bosh since Toronto has tanked. At least if they traded him they’d get something before he bolts next summer. Anyone else leaving that’s big?

niremetal

December 2nd, 2009
1:11 pm

Also, it’s basically impossible to trade Marvin until June 30 because of his BYC status – if we did trade him, it would have to be in a package with JJ, Smoove, or Crawford and we’d have to take back $16M or more in salary. Hate to break the suspense, but that ain’t gonna happen. But I know that small details like the NBA salary cap rules won’t stop people from calling for it anyway.

Horford is fine at center, and it’s really getting perplexing watching people continue to rail that he isn’t despite the fact that even his detractors admit that he one of the top 5-6 in the league at center right now. Similarly, Josh is a PF. He is not a SF. He is probably the league’s best help defender, and no coach in their right mind would play him significant minutes at a position where he’d spend most of his time on the perimeter.

So even if we could trade Marvin (which we really can’t), it should be for an upgrade at SF, not for a center. And it should be a versatile defender who won’t mind being the 4th or 5th option on offense, because that’s all he’ll be. Andrei Kirilenko would fit the bill perfectly. I can’t think of anyone else who would.

niremetal

December 2nd, 2009
1:13 pm

* and by his detractors, I’m referring to his old detractors in the press at ESPN, Hoopsworld, etc, not people on here (obviously).

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
1:19 pm

I never said trade Marvin and yes you’ve reposted those comments a thousand times. I realize Marvin’s most likely not moving. That’s why I suggested moving him to the 2nd rotation as a feature. Maybe Collins was supposed to be the answer, but what do we do when teams with some brawn roll in and out muscle Horford all night? Past few games he’s gotten used like toilet paper down low. What bigs are on the horizon to even shoot for? We missed some chances this summer. Where do we go for a big physical defensive pressence to give Al a break. It’s obvious Collins won’t be allowed to play, he’s sharing his popcorn with Randmo. Z is looking a bit lackluster and disinterested and Joe Smith is only used at PF conservatively. If we’re not going to use pieces who can we pursue with their $$ once they get tired of being glued to the bench all year.

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
1:50 pm

Man, we are desperate for a game around here. We are just stuck on the same three things.

1) Woody is awful, the sky is falling, and he is responsible for global warming.

2) Marvin is awful and we should trade him (which we can’t, because BYC rules anyway, but nevermind that)

3) Al is not a true center, we need a true center. Al is awful at his position (although he is arguably the second best 5 in the Eastern Conference; nevermind that moving Al would put Josh out of position)

4)*bonus point*- JJ is selfish and insecure about his contract and Crawford, he is awful, we should trade him.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
1:56 pm

Sky is falling here – heavy rain. I’ve argued Woodson deserves a chance, Marvin needs a defined goal/role, Al is great, but won’t hold up long term and needs help, JJ is selfish and insecure, Crawford is definitely content as advertised. We knew what we were getting when we got him. He’s an upgrade from Flip, but he’s definitely always been a streak type player. Definitely an assett & 6th man of the year.

I definitely need tonight’s game!

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
2:01 pm

Nire- how ’bout keleena azubuike? Reminds me of AK47, much cheaper.

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
2:02 pm

Fundamentals- what do you mean by long term?

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
2:08 pm

Night after night Al can’t take the beatings he’s been recieving. When the season started I was excited. It looked like Z knew he had to bring it or he’d lose his minutes. Joe Smith is a professional. I like him. I thought Collins would be able to come in and bang on nights when they had someone and I pray almost nightly that Randmo will get a fire lit. Randmo actually looked awesome in his 4 minutes this season. He hit all his shots…but that was weeks ago.

When we play essentially 2 bigs with 2 partial subs we end up with tired, battered, injured players at the end of the season when it really matters. Al needs Woody to develop the support staff behind him if we plan to succeed. If he doesn’t we’ll just continue to beat down one of the best kids we’ve got. Granted he loves it and won’t quit. That’s why we need to protect him.

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
2:11 pm

Fundamentals- I strongly disagree with you that JJ is either insecure or selfish. This rumor only cropped up to explain a small stretch of poor shooting by Joe, and a refusal by Woodson to put him on the pine. He is selfish because he wants to make the most money he can at his profession? Well, then I guess we all are, and should be selfish in that area of our lives. Joe gives a great deal of time and money to support charities and community groups in Atlanta and Arkansas. So be very careful with labeling someone selfish. He is insecure about Jamaal? What? How? I thought he was getting too many minutes and shots, now he is insecure that he is getting less? He is insecure that Crawford somehow lessens his value as a free agent? Good grief, no GM, agent, coach or player sees Jamall Crawford as viable option for Joe and his presence in Atlanta does NOT affect his next contract value in anyway.

jerrywest

December 2nd, 2009
2:18 pm

http://www.hawksquawk.net/community/index.php/topic/341655-if-woody-wont-let-teague-play-this-year/

I am SHOCKED to find out that Teague is -14 on the year in 41.7 minutes when playing in a lineup with all bench players. Shocked.

Did you know, however, that in the 20.2 minutes he has played with at least 2 starters on the floor that the Hawks are +18? How can this be? Teague is doing fantasticly better when playing with a few starters? Why in the world would that be the case?

I question Flip as being a superior comparison. When Flip Murray was playing without Bibby, JJ, Smith and Horford did you know he was also terrible from a +/- perspective?

* Law-Murray-Evans-Williams-Jones 33 minutes, -25 = WORSE THAN TEAGUE (with a starter)

* Law-Murray-Evans-Williams-Pachulia 26 minutes, -18 WORSE THAN TEAGUE (with a starter)

* Murray-Evans-Williams-Smith-Pachulia 36 minutes, -17 = WORSE THAN TEAGUE (with two starters)

Hmmm….playing with the worst players on the team tends to bring down your +/-. That is remarkable. Who would ever have anticipated this?

Did you know Bibby has not played in one lineup this season (that I can find and at least among his top 10 by minutes) without at least 3 starters on the floor? Surely that doesn’t make a difference in +/- numbers, right?

In the one lineup I could find where Joe Johnson played with all reserves he had a negative +/-. Clearly, we should bench JJ since he is hurting us on the floor when playing minutes with the dregs of our team — just like Teague.

In fact, JJ had a worse +/- ratio on a per minute basis than Teague in the lineups where they each played with all reserves. Can JJ! His number are pulled down by playing with all subs too! He must be costing us games

public/style_emoticons/default/thumbsupsmileyanim.gif
This post should win ESPN’s NBA top 10 slam dunk!!!

Hands down post of the year.

I’d like to copy and paste this all over the blogosphere – with your permission!!!

ILL-logical

December 2nd, 2009
2:24 pm

“He is not a SF. He is probably the league’s best help defender, and no coach in their right mind would play him significant minutes at a position where he’d spend most of his time on the perimeter.”

I love certitude and conviction, it’s so self rightous-especially when it involves specious reasoning and is devoid of objective fact.

First, asuming a player can meet the minimum standards of bilogical existence, they can play any position; the more probitive question is how well can they play it/ And the derivitve of that argument is what is required by a particular set of circumstances,ie the offensive / defensive approach of the particular team.

The determination of the players value-what he/she can contribute to the teams ultimate goal,viz winning- turns on not only on their individual skill set but how well it blends into the team’s strategy.

The statements regarding the capability of player J to perform the duties required of position 3 fails to state what the requirments for the position are;the implied assumption is that there are no circumstances where player J’s skills could perform reasonbly to positively affect their team’s success no matter what the duration of the performance or the system underwhich the srvice is to rendered is.

And the presumption advanced that there is afore knowledge of the state of mind of all coaches as to their decision making proces aand or coaching philosphy raises substantive questions about rational thought and the capacity to engage therein.

niremetal

December 2nd, 2009
2:26 pm

Daniel,

Azubuike is like Mo – he gives great effort, but is too short to defend most 3s and CERTAINLY is too short and not nearly long enough to defend 4s. Kirilenko is one of the few guys in the league who can defend against all 5 positions; Azubuike could only guard 2s, 3s, and most 1s.

Also, he’s out for the year with a torn knee tendon…so…

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
2:33 pm

nire- I am not trying to trade Marvin, just giving another player of Kierlenko’s ability in terms of BB IQ and effort. He is a poor man’s AK47, but he is definitely an upgrade over MO. I know he is out. This whole thing was theoretical, anyway.

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
2:36 pm

Don’t take my comments about Joe being selfish in a personal or financial way. I personally think he held out on the contract to decide where he wants to spend the end of his career. His next contract might dictate that. If the Hawks are a good fit he’ll stay. I don’t think JJ is worried about cash.

My thoughts on JJ and often Bibby is that they hold the ball,dribble too much and ISO to the point where the D just focusses on them. To me JJ forces shots when he obviously doesn’t have it. Bibby the same at times. Crawford is going to shoot regardless. He’s 6th man off the bench. If he doesn’t have it Woody should sit him back down.

Joe seems to be pushing too hard to ensure he gets 20 per night. There are nights when we paly a team game he gets 24 and nobody notices. There are others when he struggles to get 20 at the cost of the game when everybody notices. I don’t care how many JJ gets. I just want him to kick the ball to others when he’s not hitting the broad side of the barn. I feel like he’s forcing things at time to out perform Crawford.

Crawford is the same player he’s been his whole career. Some nights he’s on, some nights he’s off. It’s the coaches job to pull Bibby, Joe or Crawford when they’re not doing well and give others a chance. They should use their power to draw in the D and kick to someone else. At least then we live as a team and die as a team.

Not once did I mean JJ is selfish in terms of his contract. It has nothing to do with anything other than team play on the court.

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
2:40 pm

Ill- wait a minute, now. All respect, but it is not fair to cloud the issue of Josh playing the 3 by suggesting that basically there are no certainties in life, and no one has complete knowledge of what coaches are thinking. That is a lot of smoke.

It is not that Josh can’t play the 3, but why would you move the guy who has worked so hard to limit his outside shot, improve his post play, improve his rebounding and continue his outstanding help defense to the point that he is playing at All Star levels to position that would take him out of the position that plays to his advantages?

Ultimately, is comes down to Does moving Al to the 4 (theoretically upgrading his game) and Josh to 3 (theoretically down grading his) improve the team overall?

I say no way, especially when taking in the facts that Josh is tearing it up at the 4 and Al is honestly and All Star candidate at the 5.

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
2:44 pm

Fundamentals- Joe is currently averaging 4.5 assists per game, his career average, where is the evidence that he is more selfish?

niremetal

December 2nd, 2009
2:45 pm

Fair enough, Daniel. I don’t think Azubuike would give us what we need at the 3, though, even when healthy. Bringing him in would really amount to shifting Joe to the 3 and starting him at 2, because that usually will be better than trying the reverse. I definitely agree that he’s an upgrade over Mo, but my point in bringing Mo up was that I don’t think Azubuike has the height to be even a poor man’s AK47, because the most unique thing about AK is his ability to defend big men as well as perimeter players – a quality that Azuibuike doesn’t have. I.e. Azubuike is a 2/3 swingman (like Mo), while AK47 is a true combo forward.

I MUS WRITE

December 2nd, 2009
2:47 pm

Really Daniel……. You think JJ is a better OVERALL player than Josh. JJ is a better shooter/scorer but Josh fills a stat sheet night in and night out-Think about it steals,assists,blocked shots,rebounding on top of 14-20 pts a game. JJ is our best offensive player maybe-but u could even argue that Crawford scores easier and without the constant pounding of the ball
Sundays game shows me that if JJ has an off night he will continue to shoot and sell the team out instead of passing and gettn other guys invloved- When his shot was’nt falling what else did he provide ….not much. All in all he is still ourr leader and will do what he wants -because he knows the Coach has raisins for testicles.

Ken Strickland

December 2nd, 2009
2:51 pm

If you read the excellent and diverse comments that’s been posted over the last couple of hours, you’ll see why it would be crazy to try and limit anyone’s involvement, especially if their comments are constructive, serious, intelligent, civil and well presented, and that’s not a reference to grammar.

I also love this forum because these diverse ideas are presented in diverse ways. While I’m an in your face type of person, others present their opinions in a less direct manner, but are certainly no less effective in their presentation. I basically see 2 things that hold most of us together. (1)We’re all Hawk fans that want the best for the team, and (2)we all know the team could and should be doing better.

And like some of you, I’m starting to suffer from withdrawal anxiety waiting for tonights gm. GO HAWKS!!!!!!

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
2:56 pm

Daniel – Is stats all that matters? Do you actually watch every game? I don’t care if his assists doubled, it’s all in the flow of the game. The guy is pounding and forcing. Our “superior” guards shoot us out of the game night after night. We have no consistent inside game. Josh and Al are the keys to our offense. Mix Marvin in with shots he’s comfortable with and get out of this pound the ball, ditch for a shot clock ending 3 or JJ getting packed and turning the ball over. I guess your next email will be about JJ’s turnovers over the past few seasons. Watch the game. It’s obvious to my wife who has only watched basketball a few years.

We have a team with no real superstar. Thus we need a well rounded team game. Our team should run when they can and committ to Al & Josh when they can’t. As the inside establishes itself the outside shots will come much easier and thus we start killing folks. Watch our wins, watch or defeats and tell me it’s not obvious what’s happening.

Or you can read all this and start a blog like Ken with no real insight. Were you two at the Falcons game Sunday. You two missed an easy chance to learn what I’m talking about.

Daniel

December 2nd, 2009
3:23 pm

Fundamentals- bring back down now. I haven’t said anything to personally attack you. Let me assure you that I watch every single Hawks game, most of the home games from the stands. Let me also assure that I do know basketball and have watched and played A LOT of basketball. We can disagree about Joe’s performance, but do not insult my b-ball love, commitment or insight.
You said that Joe’s struggles, WHICH ARE OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE OVER THE LAST 4-5 GAMES, are due to him being selfish and insecure. I say that he was having a bad shooting night and trying to do what your shooting guard is supposed to do which is continue to shoot. Clearly the team plays better when the ball is moving, which is true for every single basketball team since the begining of time, so I didn’t think I needed to restate the obvious.
The results of the season are obvious, excellent overall performance, with a recent spate of poor play from EVERYONE including Joe.
I just disagree that the root of the poor play is Joe’s supposed insecurity and selfishness.

Are we clear?

Fundamentals

December 2nd, 2009
3:31 pm

All good. No worries here. Hopefully they’ll get it together tonight and we can get back to being excited for once.

Grandad

December 2nd, 2009
3:58 pm

I can’t remember who said what but here goes. Josh has all the tools to play the [3]. We switch like crazy anyway so don’t worry about help defense. A player can switch even when in help pos. so if we wanted we could constantly keep him in help pos. If he truly wants to be def. player of the yr. then playing the [3] is where that will happen [Battier]. Ill-logical, I apologize but I admit that I’m a little too dense to comprehend all that you said.

I’m with ds on Biedrins – niremetal exactly what restrictions are there on trading Marv. PLEASE understand I’m not advocating the trade of Marv, just reacting to your statement, which I don’t keep up with all the trade restrictions,etc.

I think some of you are not understanding all that Fundamentals is saying.

Josh and Joe are both well rounded players which fill up the stat sheet.
Both have strengths and weaknesses (Joe-reb./Josh-Foul shooting). I’m glad we have both. However, if it ever becomes clear that JOE is leaving, then we must move him (before tr. deadline if pos). Yes, Joe has been playing differently this yr. and one can only speculate as to the cause.

I am a proponent of Big Al moving to the [4]. That does not make me a critic of Al. He is a victim of circumstances.

niremetal: *Purely for fun and speculation as I doubt Mr. Sund reads what I have to say for ideas, but what would have to occur for a Biedrins trade prior to deadline. (particularly Marv) I do disagree that we should only trade Marv for a [3]. We have options within our team now but that’s a can of worms for later.

niremetal

December 2nd, 2009
4:27 pm

Grandad,

Due to BYC rules, Marvin’s salary from another team’s perspective would be $7.5M but from our perspective it is his old salary ($5.6M). The NBA requires the salaries in any trade to roughly equal each other (specifically, they must be within 125% + $100,000) when both teams are over the cap. Right now, every team in the NBA except Oklahoma City, Memphis, and Minnesota is over the cap – and Memphis and Minnesota have so little cap space that virtually any addition of salary would put them over the cap Thus, in order for a trade with any team but OKC to fit within the NBA rules, we would have to package Marvin with a relatively high-salary player in order to make the salaries high enough that the salaries in the trade from both teams’ perspective would be within 125% of each other. The magic number is ~$15M, which means we would have to package Marvin along with other players whose salary totals $8M or more and get back roughly $15M in salaries from the other team so that the margin of error is within the 125% range.

In other words, we couldn’t just trade Marvin straight up. We’d have to package him either with one of our 3 other high-salary guys (Jamal, JJ, or Josh) or else some combination of players whose salaries would equal ~$7.6M (and the only 2-player combinations we have whose salaries would be high enough are Bibby/Mo, Bibby/Zaza, Bibby/Horford, Bibby/Teague, or Zaza/Horford). So any trade this year involving Marvin wouldn’t be a simple matter. It would involve trading away Marvin plus one of our three best players or Marvin plus two key rotation players.