We’ve got (a few) answers

Good afternoon, all-

Thanks for your patience. I kind of ended up taking the long way back from the arena because I had to run an errand, and then lunch, then transcribing and now the blog.

Some Mike Woodson material:
He thinks the Celtics are the best team in the league, better than they were two years ago when they won the title.

The psyche question – “The Lakers, they’re the champs until somebody takes it from them. But I think this team has got a legitimate chance to win. To come in here and try to win a game would be huge for our team. It would give us some huge confidence in terms of the season and going from there. It’s not going to be easy. … We’ve got to play a perfect game to come out of here with a win.”

My thoughts. I wouldn’t go crazy parsing “to come in here and try to win a game would be huge,” as opposed to saying, “to come in here and win a game would be huge.” That was just the way he said it. What I found interesting was that he thinks his team has to play perfect to win.

Zaza Pachulia put it well, calling it “important” to win. “You’ve got to beat this kind of team. I’m not saying every time, but you’ve got to steal a game, especially on the road. The next step, to build on the things we did last year, this is it. This is the kind of game you have to win.”

Woodson on minutes distribution against the Knicks. (In order, Joe Johnson 43:51, Al Horford 41:31, Josh Smith 39:44, Mike Bibby 34:37, Jamal Crawford 26:58, Marvin Williams 21:54, Mo Evans 21:52. As many of you noted, Teague got 1:34) Basically, he said that Johnson and Horford were the ones who were unusually high.

He played Horford long because he got hot in the second half. He didn’t play Joe Smith (1:31) because New York’s small-ball style of play would have created mismatches in the Knicks’ favor. As for Teague, “I elected not to play him. Jeff’s going to play. The most important thing is we won. That’s what you’ve got to look at. Jeff’s minutes will come.”

(I think this is a pretty valid point. Eight games in, they’re 6-2. You could certainly argue that talking this early about minutes is nitpicky.)

I will say this – Woodson likes him and has very high hopes for him.

Said Woodson, “He’s just got to be ready to play when we put him in there, and he will.”

As for coming at Boston with a different strategy, he said, “I don’t think we can get away from too much of what we do.” He made the point that his team played Boston well last year, losing three games by a combined 10 points, and the last by 12. Obviously, how Crawford changes the dynamics of the series will be interesting. (Of course, Kevin Garnett missed the last two games with his knee injury)

On Marvin

As I noted in a post to the last blog, Williams spent maybe 30 minutes after the shootaround shooting. He took mid-range jumpers, free-throws and 3-pointers. He was working pretty hard – he was drenched by the time he was done.

He didn’t sound very worried about his numbers, saying it’s early, but, obviously, he was aware enough to stay after to shoot, which he said he does periodically if he feels he’s getting out of rhythm.

He made mention that he thought part of it was getting fewer shots – 6.9 per game this year compared to 10.2 last season and 11.5 the season before that. (This did not come across as a complaint.)

Mostly, what he kept going back to was that he was just trying to get his rhythm back and work on his mechanics to shoot his shot the same way each time.

He said the contract didn’t have anything to do with it, that the time to feel pressure was last year, when he was playing for his next contract.

Said Williams, “We’ve got enough guys to score. I’m never worried about me scoring personally or whatnot. There’s a lot of guys that can score on this team. If everybody comes in and does their part defensively and rebounds, it’s fine.”

Anyway, that’s about all I’ve got. I gotta get cracking on the notebook and get over to the arena. Hope this is of interest to you. Thanks again for all of the questions, and I apologize I couldn’t hit more. I’ll see if I can get to a few more before the tip.

413 comments Add your comment

Traceman

November 13th, 2009
11:57 pm

My bad, Crawford was 6-15. I thought that 4-15 sounded strange because I KNOW he made 3 FGs and scored 11 pts in the 4th.

Mz. Hawkdafied

November 14th, 2009
12:00 am

Now that’s what I’m talking about. A total team effort tonight. Well there is certainly no question that the ATL Hawks’ depth is alive and well thanks to the awesome rotation of coach Woodson tonight.

The team really showed their maturity and growth tonight. They stayed focused and kept their eyes on the prize and came away triumphant tonight.

Hawk n the Ham

November 14th, 2009
12:07 am

The Hawks pulled a Morris Day on the national media tonight, “I’m gonna make you LOVE me”.

josh

November 14th, 2009
1:06 am

Thank you, Hawks. Solid game… I loved how they stayed in the game despite the Celtics’ runs every now and then

RLP

November 14th, 2009
1:08 am

While this was a great win from a fan standpoint the Hawks do not need to get too high over one win. They do not need to get too high or too low. They are showing the maturity from having a long incubation.

And it has been good to hear from some who were negative about Woodson showing him some love tonight. But lose to NO and guess what we will be hearing until the next big game.It would be nice to have made a season W-L prediction on the LOW side.For us fans I think the season just got better.

RLP

November 14th, 2009
1:12 am

With Denver’s defeat of the Lakers there is now no team in the NBA with fewer loss’s than the Hawks.

Mychelfromatl

November 14th, 2009
1:42 am

Wholdup,

With all of these accolades being passed around, somebody, somewhere should consider giving Billy Knight a shot at rebuilding another team (Could it really hurt the Knicks, Nets, Bucks, Golden State etc.?).

SMH at Rick Sund reaping the benefits of Billy Knight’s original vision/creation SMFH.

KevinA

November 14th, 2009
1:55 am

It makes you wonder why we play the bench against a better team. Was this a lack of Woody confidence against a weaker team. And then we bust it out against a better team. I could be wrong but this unleashes the bench in the future.

Lets take another train of thought. We are so good we can make up for bench mistakes. Kid JT for one. He sucked again. Best part? Didn’t matter. Marvin? – 22 min 3-7 3 rebounds 2 assists and 0 turnovers. Not impressive but a game positive. He did good.

Evans had arguably his worst game. No problem because of his limited minutes.

Can’t say much about the rest – they all played their roles and played great. Big game for the Hawk faithful.

Hawks Fan In New Orleans

November 14th, 2009
1:56 am

Mychelfromatl
I totally agree with you – props need to be given to billy’s vision – its coming to fruition. He was a stubborn mad scientist and hey, it produced a potential elite Eastern conference team.

Nate ArchiBALL

November 14th, 2009
4:39 am

Great game tonight. If we could just get Marvin going on offense………….

Mz. Hawkdafied

November 14th, 2009
11:36 am

The rookie made mistakes but did contribute to the Hawks rebound total. He got two defensive rebounds. So like I said total team effort. Can’t have too many rebounds.

Still rook needs to see some action. Learning is not all watching and listening, and sometimes hands on learning works best. Hell mistakes are a part of learning anyway.

2 FOR JOHN DREW

November 14th, 2009
4:27 pm

GREAT WIN ……
KEN S. ….. U REMIND ME OF MATT RYAN COMIN’ IN AFTER MIKE VICK, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.

terrell barron

November 14th, 2009
10:26 pm

Heat check time! lol