Did Johnson makes the right call?

Did Joe Johnson make the right call on not signing a contract extension with the Hawks? Time will tell. But you can bet the topic will be debated daily until the end of this Hawks season, when he becomes an unrestricted free agent.

Did Joe Johnson make the right call on not signing a contract extension with the Hawks? Time will tell. But you can bet the topic will be debated daily until the end of this Hawks season, when he becomes an unrestricted free agent.

HAWKSVILLE – Much has been and will be made about Joe Johnson’s decision to bypass signing an extension with the Hawks and become a free agent at the end of this NBA season.

And rightfully so.

In the minds of us common folk, the idea of staring down $60-plus million more dollars seems laughable in these harsh economic times. But Johnson is not one of us (common folk), and there are at least $70 million reasons for that. He also has something professional athletes have maybe once or twice, if they are lucky, in their entire careers — LEVERAGE.

By playing out the final year of his deal he’ll become a free agent in the summer of 2010, joining guys like LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh in a deep free agent class that has as many as a dozen different  (financially capable) teams around the league salivating. So in that regard, he’d have been crazy to sign an extension for just four years if he stands to get not only another year but millions more by becoming a free agent next summer.

My email was flooded Tuesday afternoon by people wondering what JJ was thinking. Fans of the Hawks, writers from around the league and concerned citizens all wanted to know why he’d so such a thing. My response to everyone was the same, why wouldn’t he maximize his leverage at this time?  Teams do so all the time when their players are free agents. In recent years the Hawks have had Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Marvin Williams, Mike Bibby and Zaza Pachulia play out the final years of their deals without an extension. In almost every case things have worked out well for both sides.

It’s simply a part of the business of basketball that Johnson explained to me the other day. He could have saved his words. I get it. I don’t assume that his loyalty is somehow in question because he turned down the offer, the same way I don’t (always) question a team’s loyalty when they allow a player to finish out his deal before deciding just how much they want to invest in said player for the future. Again, it’s called leverage.

The reality in all these instances is pretty clear, you have a player for the life of his contract unless a decision is made to change that dynamic. And it’s always for better (JJ) or worse (Flip Murray’s deal was just one year), through sickness (or injury in Speedy Claxton’s case) and in health (Smith has been as durable as any player I can remember through the first five seasons of his career).

I dare anyone to suggest that the Hawks haven’t squeezed every ounce of benefit they could out of having JJ on the roster – he’s got the mileage on his body to prove it if anyone wants to inspect the tread on his tires. He’s been to three straight All-Star games and for at least the better part of his first two years he carried this team on his shoulders as the youngsters grew up and learned the nuances of the NBA game. That’s why it’s so hard for me to digest some of the venom pointed in his direction now.

As I suggested in a comment on the previous post, the idea of a highly motivated All-Star in the prime of his career itching to take his game to another level (for any reason) is an ideal situation for your team. As good as JJ has been in the past, you have to think he’ll be even better this year with the seasoned and talented roster the Hawks have in place, not to mention the quality additions to the roster like Jamal Crawford and Jeff Teague in the backcourt and Joe Smith and Jason Collins in the frontcourt.

It’s the same argument made here by many when Smith, Childress, Williams and the like were put in a similar position as pending free agents in the final year of their respective deals.

Whether or not JJ made the right call for JJ remains to be seen. And we likely won’t have a solid answer until next summer’s free agent frenzy plays itself out. But there’s no way the Hawks can lose in the meantime. No way.

366 comments Add your comment

Clyde

September 30th, 2009
8:48 am

@DanWeiner

September 30th, 2009
8:52 am

I wish this would act like a contract year kind of thing where a guy goes nuts to prove to everyone he’s worth a huge contract, but reality is Joe can fall back on the Hawks original offer if he doesn’t get a bigger offer somewhere else. The Hawks were right to offer it, Joe was right to weigh all of his options. I don’t think this a big deal, Joe will be a Hawk for a long time.

Craig

September 30th, 2009
8:53 am

Maybe this will allow the management to upgrade the starting rotation next year –

Teague/Bibby
WADE
Marvin
Smoove
Horford

mrHonline

September 30th, 2009
8:55 am

It’s all about that extra year. Don’t get me wrong, I had hoped the Hawks would nap him on a four-year deal, but I understand Joe’s decision to wait. Either way, that fifth year is gonna be a cap killer down the road…

vava74

September 30th, 2009
9:00 am

Here’s my take on previous commentaries on the preceding post:

When JJ underperformed in the playoffs, everyone was saying that he was not being aggressive and that he was not taking over games…

I distinctively remember that he tried his best to beat double and triple teams in order to find a good shot or to a pass to someone free (which was way more frequent than him forcing bad shots).

Now that he has not signed the extension, he is a ball hog… if he was a selfish guy, wouldn’t he have shot more? His FG% in the playoffs was poor, however, it was only 2% worse than during the regular season (.020) which does not necessarily translate in to him being selfish.

He was the victim of a unbalanced system which was exposed by a stronger competition, bad refereeing and further undermined by Marvin and Al’s injuries (and, of course, by his own ankle sprain).

Anyone bashing JJ is being incredibly ungrateful.

Clyde

September 30th, 2009
9:01 am

I say trade Joe and get something in return. Roll Tide.

vava74

September 30th, 2009
9:03 am

I believe that this is still relevant since it was posted as this blog was being put online:

I think the ball hogging accusations on JJ around here are going a bit over board.

Yes, JJ pounds the ball a bit too much for my taste as well, however, if we look at our system, he actually plays the PG position for us for long stretches of the game, many times, his ISO plays end up being drive and dish situations, specially when he acts as a decoy, being double or triple teamed.

Hence, I think he plays the role which has been assigned to him by Woody and it is not him conditioning our system.

This system has obvious disadvantages, however, it also has proven to have some advantages:

It maximizes Bibby’s positive characteristics as a sniper and minimizes his negative ones (he is no longer able to carry the rock and distribute consistently);

Since there is less ball movement, it diminished the TO’s in a very inexperienced team.

Now we need to see if the system evolves and JJ is required to share the rock more and let the play flow.

Nonetheless, in relation to real stats and not “impressions”, last year we rated 23rd in Assists per game with 20,20.

This is way better than how we historically fare in this chapter.

We should all note that we were ahead of Orlando which went to the finals (29th with 19,42), New Orleans who has Chris Paul (28th with 19,62), close to Cleveland which game is stalled by Lebron (20th with 20,28) and not far away from the midway mark (Golden State was 15th with 20,86 with their up tempo game).

On top, there’s the Jazz and then the Lakers, who have ball movement as default in their systems (Sloan is a great team play coach and the Triangle Offense implies that Kobe does not hog the ball).

Then comes Phoenix (up tempo game on the second half and Steve Nash) and then the Celtics (a good passing starting 5).

vava74

September 30th, 2009
9:06 am

Clyde,

We will have to revoke your “trade Joe” license as well… specially when you are all crimsonly around here… this is a Hawks’ blog!

Truth-Serum

September 30th, 2009
9:07 am

Enter your comments here

Good Grief

September 30th, 2009
9:09 am

Sekou, the way I look at it is that you have to like the way both side played the game or did business. Im a business owner and so I look at this for what it was – both sides doing business. I honestly think the Hawks offer was less than what Joe expected or even what I would expect they would have offered – especially when they offered Marvin what? 40 mil, and he was injured throughout last year. The Hawks tried to pay him based on what he did last year. So, if you’re Hawks management you want JJ to have a really good year because it increase your chances of making the playoffs for a third year in a row.

I would think that JJ has put more pressure on himself to perform well and maybe that’s what he needs. If he doesn’t perform well the Hawks maybe take their previous offer off the table for less or he gets the same offer. He plays well and he’ll get offered more because more teams will want him and the Hawks will have to come out of their pockets. Another thing working for both sides is what you mentioned about his leverage with it being a deep free agency class. The Hawks also have that going for them too because maybe they choose to go in a different direction or maybe teams pay less attention to JJ.

All around I’d say both sides made good moves – the Hawks with the initial offer, and JJ couldn’t really go wrong with his decision.

Willie Coyote

September 30th, 2009
9:09 am

Trade Joe and get WHAT in return? WTF?!

Dan23

September 30th, 2009
9:16 am

As much as I appreciate and believe what JJ has done for the Hawks and the younger players on the team. And as much as I cannot fault him for using the leverage he has. I am not sure he will be able to ever be seen as the elite player. I just do not believe he is unselfish enough to some degree. For example, in the All-Star games he has been in, he really struggled. I think teams remember things like that as well as the Cleveland sweep as they consider giving him elite money.

Ron E.

September 30th, 2009
9:17 am

Leverage? Please. Joe wants to do same thing as John Smoltz did a year ago: leave an Atlanta team that isn’t yet ready to win a championship for a different team that offers him a better shot at a ring (plus more money).

ILL-logical

September 30th, 2009
9:17 am

ILL-logical

September 30th, 2009
9:11 am
A bit of clarification is in order, I believe. Jamal Crawford was obtained as an insurance policy in the event that Mike Bibby did resign AND if Joe Johnson did not either. Mr. Sund ’s move was essentially revenue neutral because when the salaries of Acie Law, Calvin Claxton and Ronald Murray culmlatively are compared with Jamal Crawford’s , it is a wash. In addition, the 1 for 3 swap allowed Mr. Sund to bring both Joe Smith and Jason Collins without having to delete any key personnel and within the team’s budget.

With some additional assets and a relatively stable payroll, Mr. Sund is now afforded some financial flexibilty: he has made an intial offer, albeit lowball, offer to Joe Johnson to demonstrate the organizations desire to retain his services and he now has the ability to trade every other featured player on the roster to improve the team at any point in the season or in the summer.Not bad for a country boy.

Joe Johnson will get paid whether it is here or someplace else. He will however have to show more leadership both on and off the court to get there. He is going to have to do “star” type things if he wants to earn “star” money. Hiding out in Arkansas every year will no longer be an option if he wants to be among the league’s elite. Me, I hope that he achieves his goals here by making his teammates and the team better on the court and representing the organization in a visible and positive manner off of the court as well.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
9:22 am

Truth-Serum

September 30th, 2009
9:25 am

Yes! Joe has got some sense. Its not about money. Its about winning championships. Hes not going to stick around while the press and Sund try to convince him that Horford, a powerforward playing center and Zaza koncak (3″vertical leap) is what is going to help him get his ring. With champions its about winning championships.Cant be a champion with out a championship…Duh. The Hawks are playing themselves out of position(like horford),when it would have been wiser to sign flip for a whole lot less than Crawford. Let the 3″ vertical leap…leap, and sign collins. Let the contract of speedy and acie expire this year. You would have saved more than 10 million when you consider the expiring contracts, and be posied to go after a name brand,enforcer type center to get to the next level. Meanwhile with flip and collins in place of crawford and koncak you will still get a fourth place finish.

JJ is leaving because Sunds moves leave a lot to be desired. JJ is about to go to his peak years and wants a championship or 2. I dont fault him for that. Thanks for giving us hope and exciting years! Good Job JJ.

What is clear is that it is not about money. 15mil a year is nothing to sneeze at. Its about Championships. JJ clearly doesnt believe he can get it here. Not with these bone head moves.Its clear Sund (like the anti woodson hate cell) doesnt understand basketball or is not trying to win a championship.

Im with JJ on this one. I like winning.

Fork Tongue Review Board

September 30th, 2009
9:29 am

Bibby will be finish with basketball in 3 years. His skills are already diminished. What remains is a top 5 world class 3-pt shot. Thats whats keeping him in the game.

JJ Fan

September 30th, 2009
9:31 am

The only way this doesn’t work for Joe is if he sustains a big injury this year, which isn’t out of the question considering how hard Woody has worked him here in Atlanta. I hope the Hawks get everything they can out of Joe this year, and make a deep run in the postseason. That way, it won’t matter if Joe stays or not — Atlanta would still be able to attract a top FA at the end of the season.

And Craig, replacing JJ with Wade would be an even swap at best, not an upgrade. D-Wade is the only horse in the NBA who’s been ridden harder than Joe has. His physical age is much older than his calendar age b/c Miami won’t give him any help.

Truth-Serum

September 30th, 2009
9:33 am

Ron E.

September 30th, 2009
9:17 am

I couldnt agree more!

Gilk

September 30th, 2009
9:33 am

Enter your comments here
Zero concerns with this situation. Go Hawks!

dap01

September 30th, 2009
9:55 am

There is also a risk with not signing a guaranteed contract. I hope that he plays good team ball and he is with the Hawks a long time.

Hoops

September 30th, 2009
10:08 am

It’s business. If I were JJ, I would wait until next summer to see what I could get in the FA market as well.

Relax, I think JJ will have a great season for the Hawks. It will only help him in free agency as well as help the Hawks.

Sautee

September 30th, 2009
10:08 am

vava74,

You said this:

“Anyone bashing JJ is being incredibly ungrateful.”

I don’t know your definition of “bashing”, but you must remember that Joe signed a $70M contract to come here and be “the man”.

If you CHOOSE to put yourself in that position, then you should be able to handle the heat that goes along with it.

I think much of the criticism about his playoff production was valid, other than the last two games against CLE when he was obviously hurting. And I’m quite sure that if you asked Joe, he’d be the first to agree that his playoff stats are less than HE would want.

But believe me, I’m grateful for what he has done. I just refuse to believe that he’s beyond ANY valid criticism. And THAT does NOT make me “incredibly ungratelful”.

Speak for yourself.

GeeMack

September 30th, 2009
10:10 am

Vava74

Impressive. Excellent homework. I see why we agree most times. Lol.

My take on JJ not accepting the offer. JJ is in the prime of his career, and can make great money and be on a contender if he get with one of the elite players. JJ see that the Hawks past up the oppurtunity to pair him with championship caliber talent. JJ is a winner and he wants to win a championship. He sees the Hawks as a good team, but not a champioship team.

Fork Tongue Review Board

September 30th, 2009
10:13 am

JJ has earned and delivered on his $70M contract. He want a ring. He not going to get is with this team. Yes. Anyone bashing JJ is incredibly ungrateful. JJ has done his job.

Let the man go forward and pursue winning on the higher levels while the hawks play the Horford is a center game.

Jones

September 30th, 2009
10:23 am

I doubt he’s going to do better than that from anyone else next year. That’s a lot of money for any player these days, and if you read the press about the Hawks from around the league, the biggest knock on them is that they have a lot of talent but no superstar. If no one else thinks he’s a superstar, who’s going to pay him more than $15 million a year?

Hate Woodson Movement

September 30th, 2009
10:24 am

Guys lets not shift our ignorance from Woodson to JJ. Lets keep up the hate on Woodson . Lets blame this JJ leaving thing on him and Truth-Serum.

JJ is ungrateful

September 30th, 2009
10:27 am

JJ says he wants to join the elite. Therefore he doesn’t yet think he’s an elite player. He’s bashing himself for not being better. As we know, anybody who bashes JJ is ungrateful, therefore JJ is ungrateful for the job he;s done so far.

Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
10:27 am

Its not about money its about Championships! However, yes, JJ can get 15mil from another team. Its not about money. Its about winning.

GeeMack

September 30th, 2009
10:29 am

Truth-Serum

I’m with you on the champioship talk. However I think the Hawks need another bonified star regardless of position oppose to a center. If you look around the league most teams don’t have great centers. Shaq is the only great center to win a title in the last 7 years. Al could be a championship level PF. The 3rd wheel on a champioship team. I agree with you this team is not built to win a championship, and JJ wants win a champioship in the final stages of his career.

Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
10:32 am

JJ never said he wanted to be an elite player. The 15milion per year the Hawks offered speaks for itself what level of player he is. The man wants a championship!!!! What is it you dont understand? It is hard to explain to scrubbs what it like to be a champion. Its like explaining smog to a fish. They have no concept.

Sekou Smith

September 30th, 2009
10:34 am

I agree with Gilk. I have no concerns about this situation. Go Blue and Go (Smyrna) Spartans. :)

Truth-Serum

September 30th, 2009
10:41 am

GeeMack

September 30th, 2009
10:29 am

We certainly agree on more than we disagree. I think what you are saying is rather obvious. I cant see how so many can miss it.

I think where you and I may have a difference is in the definition of Good center. I look for a force at the post with a territorial mine set who is ‘CAPABLE’ OF SCORING 12-18 PTS a night so you cant leave him unattended. Please note the word capable. I disagree with your assessment of whether the more recent champions have had such a center, it is not, however, worth the debate. I have read you for a while and agree with you on much. You have a good understanding.

Thank for the shout out.

JJ is ungrateful

September 30th, 2009
10:54 am

“My sole focus right now is on this team and what we’re trying to accomplish this season,” Johnson said. “I have some goals set for this season for my team, and I have some individual goals set for myself as well. I really feel like I can be one of the elite players in this league, and it’s going to be an exciting year.”

I can see where the forked tongue name came about. He never said what he said, huh?

Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
11:11 am

Gee, Thank for the correction, sautee… I mean JJ is ungrateful. How many players are making 15 mil a year? Would you say thats an elite bunch? I would. The problem with scrubbs, is they often exhaust an conversation by debating issues that have very little relevance. Sautee…I mean JJ is ungrateful.

By the way there is a rumor that is that since the Hawks wont guarentee Woodsons contract Then JJ not sure he want to play for another coach. After all Woodson and JJ at tight.

ToeKnee

September 30th, 2009
11:11 am

Joe if your reading this don’t let these fair weather fans get to you. I know what you’ve put into this team, and I know you don’t wanna walk away right as we’re about to reach that championship level. I had hoped you would sign, but if you wanna bet on yourself, as a man i respect that. Show us what ya got!even though you already have for years now. It’s gonna be a fun year Go Hawks!

newkid

September 30th, 2009
11:13 am

To those of you inclined toward research, it would really be interesting to know which players – over the past 30 years – advanced from ’star’ to ‘elite’ status DURING their 9th year in the league. Is this a pipe dream, or does it actually happen? Is the JJ flower already in full bloom, or might we expect an unreasonable to anticipate late burst of color?

Dan

September 30th, 2009
11:13 am

Sekou,

I am leaving tomorrow for East Lansing. Will be at the game on Saturday. Go STATE!!! Never thought they would be 1 and 3 right now, though.

How can anyone be mad at Joe Johnson? If you are, you obviously have not been paying attention for the last 4 years. That is one guy, even if he leaves, that I could ever boo when he returned to Philips. That guy has made the Hawks what they are today.

Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
11:20 am

Sautee..I mean JJ, A fork tongue mean a liar…one who is dishonest one who says two different things of his or her mouth. Being unaware of a statement is not equated to a fork tongue. I understand your maliciousness and I also can see you are ignorant, which explains why you blow a Tuba for your morning alarm clock. You do get worked up over the most minor issues, most of which arent relevant.Then you want to engage conversation and debate on the trival. You remind me of the lone fly that has snook into the house and ends up in someones glass of milk. You dont serve any worthwhile purpose.

Joe Mama

September 30th, 2009
11:25 am

newkid

September 30th, 2009
11:13 am

I agree, Joe is what Joe is! And what he is apparently is worth 15million per year to a middle level team like the Hawks. To me that would make his status among the elite. I dont believe there are 15 players making 15 million a year. I do agree with you that Joe is about as good as he can get. He will be this good for the next 5 or 6 years. thats the good thing. What better is, in a couple of years Marvin Williams will be just as good if not better.

Mike is back

September 30th, 2009
11:26 am

Well after going back to the previous blog and reading all the comments I missed about JJ’s decision…absent some of his remarks, I agree with Nire, I understand the point Nire is trying to make. This is a smart business decision by JJ…he may not ever have this type of advantage to negotiate a contract again. I don’t blame him for making that decision.

Sekou also made reference to the frugal approach of ASG in contract negotiation. I don’t see where JJ is being selfish. He will definitely be sort after by other teams…someone will show him the money. I am also reminded what happen to Ben Gordon in that situation…but obviously, this is a risk JJ is will to take.

Before you spew any more hate towards the man…lets be honest…Woody has rode JJ like a borax mule. He has probably been playing tired and hurt the last two seasons. JJ has done everything this organization has asked. JJ is an All Star and he has been good for the Hawks. I do not see anything in JJ comments that indicate he ready to give up on the Hawks.

Call me crazy but I like this situation for the Hawks as well…they have Crawford and Teague to evaluate leading up to the 2010 FA. Having these guys lessens the drama for me. I think the kid Teague has the potential to be a super star in this league…by FA time some around here may be thanking JJ for making this decision…u never know.

The best thing is with JJ having made this decision…he will have to put up or shut up…knowing he will be in spot light all seasons long being hounded by reporters. He will not only be auditioning for other teams…he will be auditioning for the Hawks…its a good situation for the Hawks.

The Hawks treated their super star with respect and offered him a reasonable contract…JJ feel he is one of the elites in the league…than let him prove it…if he does you gotta pay him are let him walk…THERE IS IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO JJ AND GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Extraordinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
11:31 am

Hyummm, No Woodson no JJ…Could this be related? Does JJ like playing for Woodson?Are they that close? Hummmm interesting, to be continued….

Smell my feet!

September 30th, 2009
11:34 am

Go JJ. GET YOUR RING!! THANKS FOR THE GREAT TIMES AND SEASONS WITH THE HAWKS. YOU AND WOODSON WILL BOTH BE REMEMBERED AS THE TWO THAT TURNED THE HAWKS AROUND.

Smell my feet!

September 30th, 2009
11:38 am

Top shooting guard salaries: 1. Kobe Bryant, LA Lakers, $21.26million. 2. Allen Iverson, Detroit, $20.84million. 3. Tracy McGrady, $20.37million. 4. Ray Allen, Boston, $18.39million. 5. Joe Johnson, Atlanta, $14.23million.

HUMM THIS IS LAST YEARS…

Smell my feet!

September 30th, 2009
11:39 am

ETOP 2008-09 NBA SALARIES
Highest paid NBA players:

1) Kevin Garnett (Boston) $24,751,934
2)tie Jason Kidd (Dallas) $21,372,000
2)tie Jermaine O’Neal (Toronto) $21,372,000
4) Kobe Bryant (LA Lakers) $21,262,500
5) Shaquille O’Neal (Phoenix) $21,000,000
6)tie Allen Iverson (Detroit) $20,840,625
6)tie. Stephon Marbury (New York) $20,840,625
8) Tim Duncan (San Antonio) $20,598,704
9) Tracy McGrady (Houston) $20,370,437
10) Ray Allen (Boston) $18,388,430
11) Dirk Nowitzki (Dallas) $18,077,904
12) Paul Pierce (Boston) $18,077,903
13) Shawn Marion (Miami) $17,810,000
14) Rashard Lewis (Orlando) $16,447,871
15) Michael Redd (Milwaukee) $15,780,000
16)tie Pau Gasol (LA Lakers) $15,106,000
16)tie. Andrei Kirilenko (Utah) $15,106,000
18)tie. Amare Stoudemire (Pho.) $15,070,550
18)tie Yao Ming (Houston) $15,070,550
20) Mike Bibby (Atlanta) $14,983,603

Sautee

September 30th, 2009
11:42 am

truth-serum (and other names),

Why are you addressing me? You wanted me and Ken to not talk to you and I’ve honored that. Take your accusations where the sun don’t shine.

This will be my last post to your babble and nonsense, so leave me out of it.

I WILL say that I’m confident that Joe will re-sign here, and that’s fine with me. He’s a good player and crucial to our future. Sorry I can’t have your faith in his selfishness.

darrell starks

September 30th, 2009
11:47 am

THE CURRENT ROSTER WANT WIN A TITLE ANY WAY, WE NEED A MEGA SUPERSTAR IN THIS CITY CAN YOU IMAGINE D WADE OR LEBRON CAME HERE IT WOULD BE THE BIGGEST MOVE IN THE HISTORY OF THIS FRANCHISE.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

September 30th, 2009
11:50 am

Let joe go and go after D WADE in the worst way he will be almost as big as the nique back in the day.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

newkid

September 30th, 2009
11:53 am

Joe Mama,
From JJ’s reported statement, he disagrees with you regarding his current status as an elite player (”…I can be one of the elite players in this league…”). Notice he didn’t say he IS one of the elite players in the league; he’d be foolish to make such an assertion. If his decsion to ‘play it out’ is based upon the notion that he’ll BECOME one of the elite players in this his 9th season, and will therefore command millions more and an additional year at the tail end of the deal, I don’t see why he shouldn’t pursue that course. I just don’t know – because I’ve not done the research – if his premise (i.e., “…I can be one of the elite…”) is rational given the history of such 9th year achievements over the past 30 years. I suppose it could happen. Good luck to him.

But I’m FAR more interested in good luck coming to the Hawks than I am in what lies ahead for JJ. I suspect Sund feels that same, and if so, this decision by JJ to not re-sign is potentially a HUGE (deference to Woody) opportunity for Sund and the Hawks. It wouldn’t be far-fetched to imagine that the 4-year offer (rather than 5) was intended to elicit this sort of reaction from JJ. If he accepts, fine let’s move ahead; if he declines, let’s proceed – without the need to save face – with pursuit of a real ELITE player who recognizes we’re on the cusp of something terrific here, and wants to be a part of it. If indeed that was the thinking, sign me up for that strategy. That Sund, is he perhaps crazy like a fox?

Smell my feet!

September 30th, 2009
11:54 am

Atlanta Hawks Salaries

Player 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Joe Johnson $14,976,754
Josh Smith $10,800,000 $11,600,000 $12,400,000 $13,200,000
Jamal Crawford $9,360,000 $10,080,000
Marvin Williams $7,355,166
Mike Bibby $18 million ( 3years )
Zaza Pachulia 4,750,000.
Al Horford $3,589,700 $4,537,381 $5,953,044
Maurice Evans $2,500,000 $2,500,000
Jeff Teague
Joe Smith $1,306,455
Jason Collins $1,181,893
Mario West $1,000,497
Randolph Morris $855,189

TOTALS $52,925,654 $28,717,381 $18,353,044 $13,200,000 $0

Joe Mama

September 30th, 2009
12:03 pm

newkid
You got me mixed up with Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
11:20 am

Im just saying Joes salary proves hes among the elite. But I do agree with the reveiw board that the issue is not what joe called himself what is important is the man wants to win a championship and he feels he wont win it here. Thats what is worthy of discussion.

I dont disagree with you that the rejection of the offer was economic posturing rather than a commentary other the status of the Hawks or Woodson, but I like to count how many of the bubba crew is present so i plant statements to see how you guys will respond.

Bottom line is Woodson and JJ arrived about the same time and now both are in the last years of contracts. They get along extremely well and With Woodson Joe is his right hand man. You do the math.

Joe Mama

September 30th, 2009
12:07 pm

newkid If Joe johnson is being played a top 15 or 10 salary would that make him an elite player? Would a person practicing humility say” im an elite player”? or would he draw notice to his status by saying if I could be an elite player? Bottom line is watch the zerooooooooooo’s on his pay check and then youll know whether he is an elite player.

newkid

September 30th, 2009
12:26 pm

Joe Mama,
No, I don’t think salary is the sole criterion for elevation to the ‘elite player’ level. CP3 was clearly one of the elite players well before he got paid; the same could be said of Lebron and several others. And clearly there are numerous players on the current list of highest paid players who certainly can’t be said to be ‘elite’ (e.g., Ray Allen, Marbury, Jermaine O’Neal, and the list goes on). What one is paid is often not commensurate with one’s REAL rank among the players in the league. Look at Rashard Lewis’ situation in Orlando. Over-valued and overpaid he is. Sund should not, and likely won’t, make that sort of mistake with JJ.

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
12:33 pm

newkid- I like the Yoda speak

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
12:37 pm

Here’s my take.
The best scenario for the Hawks fans would have been for Joe to take the extension.
The best scenario for Joe is to go to free agency. Only, a catastrophic injury would hurt his value at this point.
The ASG made a reasonable initial offer to set the market on Joe and to let him know their intentions.
I am going to forget about this situation for now, because it has ZERO impact on this upcoming season.
Next, Summer we will be sweating bullets. (so be it)
Everyone that says things like get rid of Joe and bring in Wade or Lebron. Please get your head out of your rear!!! That is not going to happen. I repeat will not happen. Not a realistic option. If you make that comment any further you lose all basketball credibility.

jerrywest

September 30th, 2009
12:45 pm

Sekou

You said: “Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Marvin Williams, Mike Bibby and Zaza Pachulia play out the final years of their deals without an extension”.

Only Bibby & Zaza played the final year of their deals without extension. Childress still haven’t played the final year of his deal. Marv and Smoove signed before the final year of their deals.

Hawksgirl

September 30th, 2009
12:49 pm

What Mike Is Back said! I totally agree

flashlight

September 30th, 2009
12:50 pm

I don’t know if Johnson makes the right call. The ajc be makesin a lot of wrong calls so I don’t know

flashlight

September 30th, 2009
12:51 pm

Enter your comments here

Joe mama

September 30th, 2009
1:01 pm

newkid I think JJ is better then cp3 and I dont consider chris paul an elite player. I will agree with you on this: there is more than one way to assess who is an elite player. Salary is definitly one of them. Yes, The type of salary being discussed with JJ is one that would make him a top 10-15 assest. Any measurement outside of salary is an opinion. The difference between a pro and an amatuer is the pay. Pay is what separates the classes more often than not. Ill just agree to disagree. My point is the salary joe can command shows what his status is. Bottom line.

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
1:03 pm

GeeMack- bro!!! You are not turning into an acolyte of Truth-Serum are you? Say it aint so!

Tyger

September 30th, 2009
1:10 pm

JJ Knows Best…

If the debacle over his trade to ATL didnt teach him well, I dont know what would – this is a BUSINESS.

For the past few seasons, especially since Rick Sund arrived, the Hawks havent thrown money at any of its free agents. So, why would JJ cave early? He’s watched both Jsmoove, JChill and Marvin be told to go out and get another deal. Of course, Sund had the right to match, but it was BUSINESS. They were smart.

Now, its JJs time to be smart. Sund doesnt have the right to match. Playing hardball and over-playing your hand has set a certain tone. So, let’s see what happens?

If there’s one player other teams would love to have, its JJ – he can play well with anybody. He’s not Batman, we know, but for a team that already has a Batman, he’s a great Robin.

Stating the Obvious

September 30th, 2009
1:33 pm

Mike is back got it. Sund made the best offer you can expect him to make at this point, and JJ responded like anyone who thinks that they have the potential to be elite would have responded. Now we can all go back to watching JJ make another All-Star game, and y’all can bitch a year from now about how ASG was too cheap to offer JJ what it would take to keep him.

Steve Brown

September 30th, 2009
1:56 pm

One small point, without a contract who does JJ care more about – himself or the team. Anyone who answers the team is an idiot. When the leader of a team is more concerned with his own well being than the teams, the team is less likely to reach its true potential. Sekou, in this case both sides are likely losers, and by the way, none of the other players you alluded to were the team’s leader.

Mike is back

September 30th, 2009
2:02 pm

Hawksgirl, thanks for shot out. With what Sund accomplished this off-season…its hard for me to get upset about JJ contract negotiation…JJ played by the rules…he took a big gamble coming to the ATL…now he is being slammed because things worked in his favor. After being call out and scuff at by TNT during the playoff…I think we will finally see JJ play with a chip on his shoulder…maybe even some emotion I dare say….this is all good stuff for Hawks fans…could this finally be JJ coming out party…he must think so hmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!

Either way Sund is position to take advantage of the situation…that is why I’m not worried about JJ…I want to see what Crawford and Teague are going to do.

Mike is back

September 30th, 2009
2:05 pm

Stating the Obvious, thanks!!!

Dick Biggers

September 30th, 2009
2:06 pm

Im not here to act like a b!tch. If you want to see a b!tch look at that girl who ask here man not to go away from her. I see why your man is leaving your for some truth. Stop acting like a B!tch and let the facts speak for themselves. If you are wrong dont try to convince some one else to hate the person that prove you to be a ho. Ho.

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
1:03 pm

Deez Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
2:11 pm

Im with Mr Biggers on that one Daniel, you do act like a ho. Be your own man and stop acting like a B!tch every man is capable of forming his one opinion and forming his own thoughts What… are you the Thought police? You radical cell groups are shot out!

Extraordinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
2:12 pm

Daniel whats you opinion of These Nuttz?

Extraordinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
2:15 pm

Daniel I mean take a look at my nuttz and give me your honest opinion. You know how much I value your opinion.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
2:23 pm

Steve,

Funny. Because I seem to recall Hedo Turkoglu being the point man for a team that made a Finals run in his contract year. Yeah, he was really self-absorbed. Same with Steve Nash when he helped take Dallas to 52 wins in his contract year. Boy, he really ruined the team playing his butt off then. And don’t even get me started on how Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan really ruined their teams a few years back when they played like MVP’s in their contract years. God, what selfish team-ruining forces they were.

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
2:24 pm

Yes, those are Extraordinary Nuttz and Yes Im a Ho. Im really sorry I do act like a B!tch at times.

You dont have to speak to who I tell you Geemack. I was a little jealous. You can speak to who ever you want. I try to be more rational.Please forgive my B!tch Aizz.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
2:25 pm

I didn’t even mention JJ himself back in ‘05. Man, he really tore the Suns down in his contract year. I’d almost forgotten that.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
2:27 pm

Billups in 2007…need I go on?

Extraordinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
2:34 pm

Thank you for the compliment Daniel. Which is your favorite one…left or right?

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
3:03 pm

Nutz/Truth-Serum/Biggers et. al- Please stop using my screen name. But, thanks for proving my point that you are an idiot who is a running joke on this blog.
And if you really want my opinion: I think you are a sad, sad, lonely, person with barely the reading level of a 4th grader who so desperately seeks attention, but only in a vaguely anonymous way, so that he doesn’t feel so alone in the world. Because that giant hole inside of soul that never seems to let you feel like your OK doesn’t get any smaller with anything you have tried. And no matter what you do the overwhelming sense of having nothing of value to contribute to real life keeps nagging at you. So, I pity you.

You asked for my opinion

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
3:09 pm

And no matter what you do the overwhelming sense of having nothing of value to contribute to real life keeps nagging at you. So, I pity you.

Damn, I like anyone who knows when not to pull his punches ;)

BOB WEISS

September 30th, 2009
3:15 pm

Thats telling them Daniel. You showed them whos the real thought police. Hey by the way I think Mr extraordinary was asking your opinion on his Nutz.

Oh why were you telling some other people not to talk to truth serum? Are you a part of the imfamous Bubba association? Is it true you are part b!tch?

newkid

September 30th, 2009
3:19 pm

WOW Daniel. Thanks for channeling Howard Cosell. That was great!

BOB WEISS

September 30th, 2009
3:21 pm

Yea I wouldnot want to f with the bubba posse. They got guys like nonmental co-signing their bullsh!t. Here is the Bubba posse’s most wanted list

TRUTH SERUM…BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY
WOODSON…WATCH OUT BLACK MAN
MICHAEL VICK…OH THEY ALREADY GOT HIM
TRUTH SERUM…. YOU MUTHER FOCKER
WOODSON…ITS AN ADDICTION OF HATE.

BOB WEISS

September 30th, 2009
3:26 pm

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
1:03 pm

GeeMack- bro!!! You are not turning into an acolyte of Truth-Serum are you? Say it aint so!

Please dont leave my B!tch aizz I saw you first.Truth-serum I hate you…

Khao$

September 30th, 2009
3:30 pm

Honestly, this is a wait and see situation. It’s “bidness” at the end of the day, man. Honestly, if testing the waters is the best “bidness” move for JJ, it’s incumbent upon him to do so. This would be his third, and likely, last big contract. From Sund’s/the Hawks’ standpoint, they have to decide whether they should actively court him in the offseason, risk letting him walk, or test his trade value. It’s that simple. My only expectation of the Hawks is don’t come out of this with nothing. If we lose him, replace him talents with better or comparable talents. If you can trade and get better, do that. Draft picks don’t excite me. We’ve been there already. The result is Marvin, Josh, Al, and Teague (with Shelden Williams, Acie Law, and Solomon Jones occupying other teams’ rosters). Simply put, a draft pick=experiment unless it’s a can’t miss talent. We’re past rebuilding. We went through a decade of it.

My only expectation from Joe is to perform at an optimum level while he’s in a Hawks uniform, whether it be only this year or four more.

I have higher expectations from the organization. They cannot let Joe’s decision in the offseason of next year cripple us. That simple. If he’s still “got it” in their view, wants to be here and he’s signable, sign him. If he doesn’t “have it”, wants to stay, but you are unsure of his talents, consider your options. If he wants to leave for “greener pastures”, the Hawks don’t want to enter into a bidding war, then let him go and go get a big name who can fill his space. If you don’t want to take a risk on any of this, trade him at the deadline. In all of this, they also must be informed by the way things went down between him and the Suns during his last contract negotiation. Nice guy or not, you have to protect yourself as an organization. Things were ugly between he and the Suns before the Hawks entered into the discussion. Likewise, Joe has to look at the Hawks and ask himself, is the organization really committed to winning? Are all of the owners on board? He knows first hand because his signing spurred the Belkin fiasco. There are many varibles all sides must consider.

It’s a “bidness.” Joe is making a decision for him. I expect the Hawks to do the same for the fans of Atlanta.

Sautee

September 30th, 2009
3:35 pm

Khao$,

Very sensible post.

BOB WEISS

September 30th, 2009
3:36 pm

Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
11:20 am
You do get worked up over the most minor issues, most of which arent relevant.Then you want to engage conversation and debate on the trival. You remind me of the lone fly that has snook into the house and ends up in someones glass of milk.

You dont serve any worthwhile purpose.

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
3:03 pm

And no matter what you do the overwhelming sense of having nothing of value to contribute to real life

You asked for my opinion….

Yeah. He did, but you just plagarized the comments of fork tongue review. Can you and your trolls go find a house to haunt?

Extraordinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
3:38 pm

Plagarize Dezz nuttz!

Fork Tongue Review Board.

September 30th, 2009
3:42 pm

Guys give Daniel some time its a monthly thing that most guys dont understand. Time out.

Khao$

September 30th, 2009
3:42 pm

Thanks Sautee. As a fan, I want was best for the team. My biggest thing is if he leaves, that’s on him. I just want my team to proactively review all options. Honestly, until he actually becomes a FA, the Hawks are in the driver’s seat. They retain his rights and contract. They can either pursue resigning him or trade him and seek maximum value. If you’re Rick Sund, you don’t panic. Joe controls the process if you’re banking on him returning and putting all of your eggs in that basket. Don’t let him string you along. However, Joe owes it to himself to see what his value is. Again, this will probably be his last big payday. Plus, as he gets older, his chances to get a championship will dwindle.

Steve Brown

September 30th, 2009
3:46 pm

niremetal and the rest of you,
First, you have too much time on your hands
Second, you list a few nice examples but simple common sense says otherwise or are you not familiar with common sense.
Third, why don’t all you wizards and geniuses use your real names, are you afraid of something, do you lack self-confidence or do just like to hide like a little girl or boy.

jerrywest

September 30th, 2009
4:06 pm

Sekou

How did the players do in Day 2 practice?

...

September 30th, 2009
4:14 pm

Please trade him!

...

September 30th, 2009
4:21 pm

I would pay Josh Smith more money & JJ less!

because
5>2
And because Josh Smith plays well in the playoff!!!

Trade JJ!

But What do I Know

September 30th, 2009
4:28 pm

Look, Joe Johnson isn’t going anywhere! Yes, he is a 3 time All Star, but he is not in the top Free Agents group after this Season! I will Bet ANYONE a $1 to a dime that NO OTHER TEAM offer JJ the amount that Atlanta has. Truth is he was never worth the first contract that the Hawks signed him too in the beginning, but JJ did get better & become deservant on his Contract! He a PLAYOFF BUST! JOSH SMITH CARRIED THE HAWKS IN THE PLAYOFFS LAST YEAR! WHERE WAS THE ALL STAR JJ? DID HE EVEN SUIT UP? I WATCHED EVERY PLAYOFF GAME & CAN’T TELL YOU IF JJ CAME TO THE GAMES, because he did nothing! He is scared when he plays against The Real NBA Superstars! There is no I in team, But there is a I in WIN(as Michael Jordan said) & JJ is not that caliber Star! “Lebron James,Dwayne Wade, Kobe Bryant, Carmelo Anthony, SO STOP IT!!! I MEAN STOP IT RIGHT NOW!!! YOU GUYS ALL KNOW THAT THE HAWKS BEST DAYS ARE BEHIND THEM! ALOT OF GOOD TEAMS IN THE EAST HAVE STACKED THEIR DECKS! THE HAWKS WILL BE FIGHTING FOR THE 6-8 SPOT FOR THE PLAYOFFS! WHICH WILL PAIR THEM WITH THE CELTICS OR CAVS AGAIN IN ANOTHER SWEEP SERIES! DID I MENTION THAT I’M A HAWKS FAN? But what do I know?

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
4:40 pm

Khao$- I love everything you said. I just worry about the reality of being able to find this player to come to the Hawks. The “big name”. But in principle, I am right there with you.

Niremental and newkid- thanks, I try to stay civil on here. You know it is supposed to be fun blogging about the Hawks. Sometimes you gotta let ‘em know that just because you don’t go there, doesn’t mean you can’t.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
4:42 pm

BWDIK,

I will Bet ANYONE a $1 to a dime that NO OTHER TEAM offer JJ the amount that Atlanta has.

So you want to bet that no other team will offer JJ at least 4yrs/$60M next summer? At 10:1 odds? Buddy, I will take that bet before some other greedy person swoops in, and I will even let you name the stakes.

Steve,

First, you have too much time on your hands

Why yes, I do. But I am pretty damned happy about the amount of time I have on my hands now. Trust me, it didn’t come cheap.

Second, you list a few nice examples but simple common sense says otherwise or are you not familiar with common sense.

I’ve heard of common sense before. And common sense says you can’t read jack into a player doing what the vast majority of NBA free agents do in this situation – unless they get an over-the-top offer (which the Hawks’ offer to JJ most certainly wasn’t – a point that even some people critical of JJ’s decision concede), they play out their contract and use whatever leverage they have to get a better offer. That’s called capitalism. It’s hardly contrary to common sense to think that JJ wants to stay here, but doesn’t want to settle for a lowball offer.

Third, why don’t all you wizards and geniuses use your real names, are you afraid of something, do you lack self-confidence or do just like to hide like a little girl or boy.

Uh…is this is a joke? Have you never been on a blog before? Do you not know what a “handle” is? And by the way – the regulars around here DO know my name. Not that it would make me a coward if they didn’t. It would make me a…uh…blogger.

Hoosier

September 30th, 2009
4:44 pm

I agree that JJ has lived up to expectations, and then some, since coming over from the Suns. But, JJ turning down the Hawks latest offer is not about business, it’s about EGO. It was a fair offer, especially considering these times, and the decreasing revenue that won’t be coming in to the NBA next year.

Most Hawk’s fans, journalist, and NBA personnel have a very realistic veiw of JJ’s abilities, that he is above average. Only JJ and maybe his closest friends will ever put his abilities into the class of the NBA’s elite.

His decision should have been an easy one, don’t risk that kind of money to injury, and for appearance’s sake, at least look like the ultimate team player. It’s business when a General Manager, has to cut a million here or a million there to get a talented roster under the luxury tax. I do not think it is business for a player to turn down anything close to what he is worth, in this environment, it’s EGO. And the EGO does not match the talent.

Daniel

September 30th, 2009
4:45 pm

oh and “Bob Weiss”- I didn’t plagarize anything because I actually wrote a complete sentence. Did you really mean to write snook[sic] twice.

Alright, I will let it go. Just go back to making your random comments to no one.

I sincerely hope that you get better.

...

September 30th, 2009
5:00 pm

If the knicks don’t get Lebron or wade they will try to get JJ And they will offer him more money then the hawks. and JJ will take their offer.

But What do I Know

September 30th, 2009
5:05 pm

niremetal Have you ever played any sports? Do you know how teammates feel in situations like this? Most of them feel like Oh well F@@K him! He Leaving anyway! So i’m telling you that his decision could affect the teams chemistry! We shall see won’t we! Joe Johnson is all about self anyway! I go to ALL THE HOME GAMES & WHEN jOSH SMITH WAS DOING WELL IN THE PLAYOFFS jOE JOHNSON WOULDN’T LOOK HIS WAY TO PASS HIM THE BALL FOR NOTHING! Funny thing is That F@ggot @ss coach is getting what he deserves! He was being all at odds with Josh Smith & kissing Joe Johnson’s & know what? his GOLDEN BOY IS LIKE F@@K HIM TOO! JOE GOING AFTER THE BIGGEST CHECK! LOYALTY CHANGES WITH CIRCUMSTANCES RIGHT JOE?

newkid

September 30th, 2009
5:14 pm

Not sure I buy this business about not wanting to come out because I’m a competitor, or coach ASKING me if I want a sub. If you trust the sub to competently give you a blow, you don’t refuse to sit for a few minutes; if you don’t trust the sub, it’s another matter altogether. Maybe there were reasons in the past for not trusting the sub; not sure that’s the case this year.

And coach needs to make sub decisions based upon the best short-term AND long-term interest of the side, rather than simply ASKING a player if he wants a blow. Playing a cat 40+ minutes per night because he says he doesn’t want (need) a blow sounds kind of screwy to me. That sort of thing sounds like ‘one flew over the cookoo’s nest’ (patients running the asylum).

Steve Brown

September 30th, 2009
5:26 pm

niremetal
So what do bloggers have to hide? Do they fear they may say something stupid? I just don’t get not owning up to one’s opinions. Maybe you can enlighten me. I’ve never been a joiner so please don’t tell me the reason is everyone does it that way.

...

September 30th, 2009
5:33 pm

When the hawks sell their new jerseys I will not buy #2. I don’t like selfish people, but i will buy #5!

GO HAWKS!

September 30th, 2009
5:39 pm

GO HAWKS & JOSH SMITH!!!

AND JJ, YOU GO TO ANOTHER TEAM!

GO HAWKS!

September 30th, 2009
5:44 pm

MR. SELFISH go get your money!!!

Sautee

September 30th, 2009
6:02 pm

From Sekou’s article:

“When I’m out there, I don’t want to come out,” Johnson said. “I just pay the price later. In the heat of the battle, I don’t ever want to come out.”

That’s why Johnson cringes every time he hears complaints about Woodson playing him too much.

“I can’t put a lot of that on coach,” he said. “You have to put it on me, because even when he asks me if I want a break or if I’m tired, I always say no. Even if I’m tired and I can’t breathe, I still tell him no. That’s not me being selfish. I’m just a competitor to the point that I feel like I can really do something to help my team win.”

Joe, TRUST YOUR TEAMMATES!

And you are kidding yourself. It IS being selfish (or at the very least shortsighted) if you are fatigued enough that you can’t breathe, but think YOU can do better than a rested teammate. I LOVE the competitiveness, but not at the expense of hurting the team. Reserves are there for a reason. No wonder he turned it over in crunch time so much. He was gassed.

This attitude troubles me and I sincerely hope that Woodson starts “telling” Joe to come out instead of “asking”.

Imagine having to guard him late in the 4th quarter if he had only played 28 minutes instead of 38. Scary.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
6:11 pm

Steve,

Sorry, I never did a sociological research project on why bloggers use handles. My guess is that it’s to give a sense of individually. I used to go by “Matt” around here until I noticed that someone else was posting using the same name. So I went back to my old email address and AIM screen name, which itself is a portmanteau of my 3 favorite bands from when I was a kid (NIRvana, REM, METALlica).

It’s not just on blogs. It’s on AIM, gtalk, and most other forms of internet communication. People like to use a handle that reflects their sense of individuality. Ariose used to be SalimFan. Big Ray is a big guy named Ray. Doc is…uh…a doctor. Sautee…well, I don’t know what the hell Sautee is about. He likes marinated steaks? Who knows. It’s an expression of his individuality.

Lastly, dunno if you noticed from all the Myspace/Facebook/Craigslist killings, but there’s a lot of psychopaths out there, and it’s not hard to figure out why it might be a bad idea to broadcast your name to the world when someone can use your name and Google to figure out where you live.

But my guess is you don’t actually care. You seem like you were just looking to attack people who disagree with you. In any case, most people won’t take kindly to those who come in, judge them, and call them cowards without even attempting a dialogue first. Just some free advice.

BWDIK,

So I take it your 10:1 odds are off the table? And I take it that you feel Josh and Marvin were giving the finger to the rest of the Hawks when they decided to play out their contracts instead of accepting the team’s offer a year before they had to? And the same is true of Hedo? And Bibby? And Nash? And the other 95% of NBA players who have played out a contract at some point in their career?

I have played sports, but I’ve never been a pro player and I’m gonna take a wild guess here and say you haven’t either. Because you seem to assume that JJ’s teammates are as ignorant about the business of pro sports as you seem to be.

Steve Brown

September 30th, 2009
6:35 pm

niremetal
Second time you said I called you a coward (sorry if you took my writing that way). Never said it or wrote it but I certainly feel people should have the moral courage to stand by their opinions with actual names. Are you the Matt that 790 let go, if you are, I really thought (think) you have real talent if someone would mentor you to round out the rough edges. Good luck and sorry you have to work with Kincade.

junebaby

September 30th, 2009
7:29 pm

i don’t consider tracey mcgrady a premier player, as a prev. blogger claimed! i believe he was headed that way at one point in his career, but all of that changed the last 3-4 years. with all the injuries limiting his time to 50 games of less lately, that’s not superstar material. i agree he is an impact player when healthy, but healthy is the key word. there’s just no comparison to players logging 70-82 games plus playoffs. this is no knock at mcgrady, but facts are facts!

rusty

September 30th, 2009
7:40 pm

but what do i know
i think you are the smartest one on this blog. you make sense. if jj wants a championship so bad he would show up for the play offs. woodson catered to jj so much that team totally lacks ball movement & this is why we get blown out early in games. iso joe offense will never win a championship.

MannyT

September 30th, 2009
7:58 pm

I don’t understand why people get so upset when someone else tries to maximize thier paycheck in a legal way. I doubt JJ is collecting compromising photos of ASG ownership or management. He’s just waiting it out to get the chance to get offers from other teams. If I am not mistaken, the average person can interview for a job almost anytime he/she likes. Not true for those with non-compete clauses and professional athletes. If he is willing to take his chances on avoiding a career threatenting injury, he should get the opportunity for some team to show him the money.

It’s not personal, it’s business…and one that JJ is unlikely to have significant leverage in after this next contract.

BWAF

loyalhawktillidie

September 30th, 2009
8:10 pm

guys i think we have to keep jj because lets face it wade and lebron are not coming here in a million years and jj looks better and younger than most of the other free agents….

Ryder

September 30th, 2009
8:11 pm

I believe that Joe Johnson is perfectly suited to be a number 2 star on a championship team, but the kind of guy that can take a team to a title. Sund has to realize this, and what Atlanta needs is a) a true number 1 threat that can take the heat of JJ or 2) establish enough depth offensively to where JJ’s not double teamed night in and night out.

Like it or not, right now Atlanta is in that group with Washington and Miami: good enough to make the second round but that’s it. Unfortunately that’s always been the mantra for the Hawks, and Sund realizes that perhaps Woodson is not the guy to take this team to the next level.

This is the year that we see if this team has what it takes to make that push into the East’s elite. Boston is not getting any younger, Carter may sink Orlando’s chances with his inability to play in the big games, and Cleveland is only a threat if LeBron doesn’t leave.

It’s now or never for the Hawks!

BosnianBaller

September 30th, 2009
8:25 pm

Hey Sekou can you ask JJ if that was really him witting those tweets in the offseason?

Mike is back

September 30th, 2009
8:34 pm

“We all look at Jamal as a guy that can score the ball and there’s no doubt, he’s as good as you can get in that respect,” Woodson said. “But he’s a much more dynamic player than that, as is [rookie point guard] Jeff Teague. And the sooner the rest of our guys figure out how they can play off of these guys, the more dangerous we’ll be.”

THERE IT IS quote from Woody…after reading this I’m sold…Woody is smart enough to know that both these cats bring a dynamic dimension to the team. Like I said…I like what I’m hearing from Woody…only time will tell…but Woody is giving early signs Teague will get some burn. Can’t wait to see how it all comes together…should be a monster.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NonMental

September 30th, 2009
9:08 pm

Bubba posse 8:52 pm call to hate;

Bubba hate association top 5 people to insult and assault with hate

Truth-Serum – get that mother frocker he keeps mocking our crew

Woodson – keep the hate on him I think hes ready to fold

Obama – hes against all the lobbyist that have held down science and medicine for years for the sake of a dollar and hes also helping the poor and disadvantaged. Hate on him at all cost.

Joe Johnson – hes Woody’s boy and probably wont sign unless hes got some assurance that Woodson will be around to. I need a lot of you to create fictitious names like Daniel.- good job masquerading ass But What do I Know, Daniel. Keep up the hate your identity is known only to the Bubba posse. You are to be promoted to Grand poot but for your undercover work.

Michael Vick – let’s Keep up the hate on this guy, especially now that Mattie lice is have a difficult time. Last game against the pat really show that the birds pass off the run and without a running game Mattie lice is exposed as a noodle arm quarter back.

Im truly enjoying the hate you guys are bringing forth. You have turned this blog site into a cell of hate. All true hawk fans will be turned off! Good job Bubba Nation!

norm van brocklin

September 30th, 2009
9:14 pm

Coaches dont take teams to the next level hard work and talent does. Coaches can only coach according to the level of talent available. DUH@!

Extraondinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
9:17 pm

When you complimented my nuttz you said a mouthful!!

Extraondinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
9:18 pm

Extraondinary Nuttz

September 30th, 2009
9:17 pm

Daniel
When you complimented my nuttz you said a mouthful!!

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
9:24 pm

Steve, let me add that I still have a lot of aliases that I use to mask my hatred of Woodson. Im really abusive and a butt hole but I would like to be respect did so I do my hate woodson under a alias just like most of the guys here. Then I try and sound competent and respectful as Niremental. Some guy has pickup on this and is using my name as nonmental. Trust me, Im mental.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
9:25 pm

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
10:07 pm

CHECK OUT HAWKS TRAINING CAME CENTRAL!!!!NEW VIDEO INTERVIEWS WITH JAMAL CRAWFORD AND JEFF TEAGUE!!!!!!

http://www.nba.com/hawks/news/2009_training_camp_central.html

o_0

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
10:08 pm

Big Ray

September 30th, 2009
10:11 pm

I don’t blame Joe for exploring his options. What he’s really saying to me is “I know how this game is played, and I’d like a little more money.” That doesn’t mean he wants out. If he did, he’d have asked for a trade or done what he did in Phoenix (asked the front office not to match the contract Atlanta was offering). Okay, how is this something new? Besides, the front office has done this to other players, now it’s their turn to sweat a bit. But I think Sund hedged his bets with Crawford, just a bit. And he was wise to do so.

Still, there are some things said in connection with Joe Johnson that I find to be a repeated theme:

“Joe is the best thing that ever happened to the Hawks”

Okay, I hear that. But does that tell you just how good Joe is, or does it tell you about the decisions made by the organization over the years? Or a bit of both? Would we be still saying that if we had drafted Chris Paul? Or Deron Williams? Or Brandon Roy? Before you rip into this, consider what a guy like Paul did for a WEAKER team in his first 2-3 years before you answer. No, I’m not comparing Joe to these other guys, player to player, in a vaccum. I’m talking about decisions that could have been made, and players that could have been obtained IN ADDITION to Joe. Guys who are considered by many to be either on par with his impact on a team, or even greater…Just sayin’…

“Joe will easily be offered 16-18 million by several other teams.”

How can we be sure of this? We can’t. And while I agree that super franchise guys like Kobe Bryant get 24 million, they got that kind of money BEFORE the economical downturn. There is no absolute guarantee of such a salary now (though still a likelihood for the game’s absolute best), even more so for guys who are a tier below the Kobe and Lebron types. Not only that, but how many teams are willing to shell that kind of money out on an offer sheet unless they are certain that Atlanta won’t match it? Offer sheets are gambles. Serious gambles. Bigger than World Poker Championship gambles. Also, if considering signing Joe away, you have to look at your own team’s talent level, as opposed to that of the Hawks. If a Johnson-led team can’t get past the second round (let’s assume at full health), what’s he gonna do for a less talented team? Oh, and have we forgotten that times are so hard, that the NBA handed out a 10-12 million dollar stimulus package to half the teams last season? Yeah, everybody’s looking to shell out 16-18 million for a guy like Joe. Won’t call that wrong, but I won’t call it right, either.

“Josh and Marvin signed longterm but neither had a better offer than what the Hawks made. Same for Zaza.”

Wrong on one count. The only reported offer on the table for Josh Smith was Billy Knight’s original offer of 5yrs/$45 million. Josh was offered 5yrs/$58 million by the Grizzlies, which the Hawks matched immediately. $58mil > $45mil.

“By not signing tell me he does not want to be here and money is the motivator.”

Okay, but I don’t think the two are mutually inclusive. We can just as easily say that Bibby, Zaza, and Marvin all stayed because they couldn’t get better money elsewhere. Using the same logic, we could conclude that none of the three wanted to be here, and that money was the only motivating factor. Sound fair? Not to me…

“Joe does not deserve an elite/superstar contract because he is not an elite/superstar player.”

How do we know what Joe wants, money-wise? How do we determine an “elite” contract versus an “not quite elite” contract? Two good examples: Gilbert Arenas and Rashard Lewis. Which guy, if either, is an elite superstar? And would you call those elite contracts they get? I wouldn’t quite call 14-17 mil a year a superstar contract, though I will say that it can’t be too far from it. All the same…

Joe says he wants to become an elite player. I’m interested in how he thinks he can achieve that goal. Certainly not by playing more minutes. I figure it has to be an increase in efficiency. This will be interesting.

Big Ray

September 30th, 2009
10:17 pm

Meanwhile, despite all the JJ hubbub, great article by Sekou on Jamal Crawford. The man is drawing raves from his teammates about his passing ability, and apparently….he can play defense.

Well, I’m sure some still don’t want to hear this kind of stuff, but the season will be here, and we’ll all get to see it. More positive and encouraging words from Woody:

“We all look at Jamal as a guy that can score the ball and there’s no doubt, he’s as good as you can get in that respect,” Woodson said. “But he’s a much more dynamic player than that, as is [rookie point guard] Jeff Teague. And the sooner the rest of our guys figure out how they can play off of these guys, the more dangerous we’ll be.”

Say what you want about Woody and how good he sounds this time of year, but this is the truth. One guy who needs to take it to heart is Joe. He should know how to play off of other guys, as that’s what he came from in Phoenix. Bibby won’t have a problem, he never forgot.

Tony

September 30th, 2009
10:39 pm

Let him walk because Josh Smith said he is the NEXT BIG THING.

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
10:42 pm

I suppose imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Too bad that was a pretty weak imitation.

Good points all, Ray. Although honestly? I think Al Horford is more likely to be a starter for a title-winning team during his career than CP3 is. And I’ve given you my reasons why. All things considered, I think I’d rather have Marvin and Horford than CP3 (keep in mind that if we had drafted CP3, we probably would have lost our #1 pick in 2007 entirely because it was only top 3 protected…)

I obviously don’t think that Knight was thinking “boy, let me pass up the draft’s best player twice in a row so I can get a shot at a potential All-Star big man in 2007.” But as it turns out, that’s exactly what happened. It’s just funny how things work out…

Sekou Smith

September 30th, 2009
10:44 pm

I was warned by someone I trust that I’d be taken aback by Crawford’s complete game. And they were right. He’s much more of a complete player than he’s given credit for, mostly because he’s such an accomplished scorer that people tend to overlook the other aspects of his game.

And I hate to keep repeating the same thing in regards to JJ, but why is it okay for a team to decline to sign a player to an extension but not okay for the player to decline an extension offer? That doesn’t compute with me. The motive are always the same when it comes to contracts, the team wants the player at their desired number and the player wants his desired number. They usually meet somewhere inside those extremes. Why there’s more animosity directed at the player that declines an extension than to the team that declines to sign a player to an extension makes no sense to me (are you confused yet? I know I am after writing that. :)

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
10:50 pm

I agree with Nire. LEAVE MARVIN ALONE RAY!!!

……Unless we’re trading him for Rudy Gay…..anyhoo…. 8-O

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
11:01 pm

Sekou, So true. Happens all the time. Team goes low, player goes high & they meet in the middle, which is usually whats best for the franchise and the player.

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
11:03 pm

JJ is worth it. Like I said on the last blog, 4 years??? Rick should’ve put a lil’ sumthn’ in JJ’s Gatoraid before he pitched that offer!

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
11:05 pm

If Joe goes BONKERS this season, and the team has a CRAZY year; I’m thinking 6yrs with a player option in there somewhere…

WTF!!!

September 30th, 2009
11:14 pm

WHAT THE HELL, WHY ARE YALL MAD @ JOE CAUSE HE WON’T SIGN , DAMN IF YALL CAN READ AND STOP TRYING TO MAKE IT BIGGER THEN WHAT IT IS, HE CLEARLY SAID HE’S NOT WORRIED ABOUT THAT NOW, WHY??? CAUSE THAT WILL CAUSE SO MUCH ATTENTION ON HIM, HE TOLD YALL HE IS WORRIED ABOUT THE TEAM, AND TAKEN THEM TO THE NEXT LEVEL, THE HAWKS HAD ALL SUMMER TO OFFER HIM , AND NOW WHEN TRAINING CAMP COMES THEY WANT TO DO IT, THATS NOT HOW U HANDLE BUSINESS, ITS PRACTICE TIME, U DO THAT ON UR OWN TIME, AND THATS THE OFF SEASON, AND YALL KEEP COMPARING JOE TO WADE AND JAMES, HE WOULD KILL BOTH OF THEM 1 ON 1, AND U SEE WHAT HE DID TO KOBE LAST YEAR HELD HIM UNDER 15 POINTS, AND CROSSED HIM OVER, I DONT KNOW WHAT GAMES YALL LOOKIN AT, I GUESS CAUSE HE’S NOT ON SPORTCENTER TOP 10 EVERY NIGHT DUNKIN ON PEOPLE OR CAUSE HES NOT ON ANY COMMERCIALS, YALL FORGOT IF IT WASNT FOR HIM THERE WOULDNT BE NO PLAYOFFS, NO MORE THEN 13 GAMES WON, NO GAME 7 AGAINST THE CELTICS, NO SECOND ROUND AGAINST CLEVELAND, HE GAVE WADE THE BUSINESS SHOOTING EVERY WHERE ON HIS ASS EVEN FROM THE WING OF THE BIRD, BUT YALL STILL WANT TO DOG THIS MAN, HE PLAYED THROUGH A SPRAINED ANKLE, AND NEVER COMPLAINED ABOUT NOTHING, NOW THATS A PLAYER WITH HEART, WADE, KOBE, AND JAMES, HAD A SUPPORTING CAST THAT THEY CAN DUMP IT OFF TO ANYTIME THEY WILL MAKE A SHOT, JOE DIDNT, ITS NOT ABOUT HOW MANY POINTS YOU SCORING ITS ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIPS, KOBE HAS ONE CAUSE OF SHAQ, WADE HAS ONE BECAUSE OF SHAQ AND OTHER ALLSTARS ON THE TEAM, LEBRON HES OUT THE PICTURE HE SUCKS EVERYTIME IN THE PLAYOFFS, YALL JUST SOME D!@% RIDERS, DONT KNOW NOTHING BOUT A GAME, AND DONT WATCH I SEE, JUST A BUNCH OF BLOGGERS TRYING TO GET ATTENTION, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY YALL THE ONES UPSET, BLOWING YALL BRAINS OUT, WHILE THEY JUST CHILLIN LAUGHING AT YALL ASS, WHILE THEY GETTIN PAYED AND HITTING THE CLUB AFTER A WIN OR LOSE POPPING BOTTLES ON YALL LAMES, KEEP HATING ON HIM AND WISH HIM AWAY, I PROMISE BASKETBALL WILL NOT BE THE SAME AROUND HERE, IT WILL BE BACK TO 13 GAMES, MAR MY WORD, AND WHOS SAYS JOSH SMITH CAN CARRY THE TEAM, MAN PLEASE, KILL YO SELF, HE CANT DRIBBLE OR SHOOT, NO LOW POST MOVES AT ALL, ALL HE CAN DO IS GIVE U ONE GOOD BLOCK, AND A HIGHLIGHT DUNK, BIBBY CAN SHOOT BUT NO DEFENSE, AL CAN REBOUND BUT NO OFFENSE AND JUST A LIL DEFENSE, BUT KNO LOW POST MOVES, MARVIN TOO CLUMSEY,AND YALL CAN BLAME IT ON THE COACH ALL DAY, HE JUST DONT HAVE THE PLAYERS, BUT JOE THATS WHY HE USED HIM SO MUCH, GET YALL FACTS RIGHT MAN BUT THE HAWKS WILL BE BETTER THEN EVER THIS YEAR, THIS IS THE SUPRISE TEAM, GO HAWKS!!! AND JOE JOHNSON #2 ALOT OF YALL HATE HIM BUT I PROMISE MANY MORE PEOPLE LOVE HIM!!!! REMBER THAT!!

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
11:25 pm

WTF!!, you seem a lil angry bruh o_0. How bout’ you take your own advice and chill. Pop a couple bottles and DROWN YO SELF FOO!!! 8-O

Big Ray

September 30th, 2009
11:28 pm

Nire ,

That wasn’t my point at all, you know it, and I’m not taking the bait.

Ariose ,

You know I’m not a Marvin basher. Or you should.

Big Ray

September 30th, 2009
11:30 pm

Ariose ,

Did you get my e-mail?

niremetal

September 30th, 2009
11:43 pm

Damn Ray, you’re no fun ;)

Ariose

September 30th, 2009
11:43 pm

Ray, thanks for the heads up lol. It’s been a few days since i’ve checked it heh…..and you know i was jus playin’ about Marv…..not the Rudy part though ;-)

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
12:07 am

Ariose,

Eh…I’m not so impressed by a guy who is the second best young player on a team that has lost 60, 60, and 58 games. He bears an eerie resemblance to Glenn Robinson – he puts up virtually no numbers in any category but PPG, and puts forth next-to-no effort on defense. Then again, I should probably stop expecting swingmen to play defense…it’s increasingly rare to say that from a perimeter player these days. We haven’t seen a young Artest/Tayshaun/Battier/Raja come up in awhile. Granger and Gay don’t commit themselves to defense, and Thornton is little better. I used to like Iguodala, but he’s slacked off a bit ever since he became “the man” in Philly.

Perimeter defense is a dying art…

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
12:08 am

Oh, and Kirilenko belongs in that category of “swingmen who play D” as well.

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:13 am

Nire ,

I take that back. :) I will take the bait. But not the proffered bit.

You’ve made your argument for (or rather, against) CP3, and it’s a solid one. But I find it amusing that you ALWAYS stop with him, and leave Deron and Roy alone…

Deron is the kind of pg that other players want to play with. More importantly, he’s the kind of pg that BIG MEN want to play with. Ask Carlos Boozer. Draft him, and you don’t need Joe to run the offense. Joe can score 25 a game playing off the ball. And I say once again, what big man doesn’t want to play with a pg like Deron? Sure, we likely wouldn’t have gotten the chance to draft Horford, as we wouldn’t likely have retained a top 3 protected pick. The fact that we did was pure, unadulterated luck and nothing else, as it is. But a better team attracts better free agents, does it not? Not always, but more often. Nothing against Al Horford (love the guy), but surely it’s not any more conjectural to assume that we could have attracted a decent big man free agent, and therefore not needed to draft Horford. I mean, we HAD to draft Horford. We needed someone better to play center than what we had.

Similarly, you ignore Brandon Roy. Draft HIM, and you get him IN ADDITION to Marvin and Joe. Okay, so you don’t get Horford. But you have more options, and we’re still a better team than the year before. And Joe doesn’t have all the pressure on him. Either way, asset management comes into play here. Feel like JJ wants too much money, or is injury prone? Fine. You have Brandon Roy, you ain’t gotta have JJ. You can trade him. Or..you can trade Roy. Either way, you can use one to obtain a decent big man, even if you have to do it via a package deal. Tell me, what is Roy’s worth, and what was/is Sheldon’s trade value?

This isn’t about which guy is most likely to be a starter on a championship team, an argument that’s so broad, I don’t think it has much merit, as players can CHANGE TEAMS. A few years back, you could have labeled Pau Gasol as you do CP3. But not now, eh? How about Trevor Ariza? You could have labeled him as such when he was with Orlando. Not now…

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:19 am

It’s funny how that perimeter defense thing works. Kobe had the potential all along, but it took some Jedi mind tricks by Phil Jackson to convince him that the way to win was for him to play better “D”. Sure enough, he proved it in the Olympics, and in that championship run.

Thing is, I understand why guys who have to be “the man” concern themselves more with offense than they do defense. I don’t like it, but I understand it. Yet, Kobe had no excuse, particularly once Gasol came along. When you’re out there with Gasol and Odom, you can’t use the excuse of “I’m saving myself for offense.”

Ariose ,

No problem. Hit me back on the e-mail when you can. And I feel you on Rudy Gay. I like his game, and there’s no substitute for a 20ppg scorer. But fit is everything. Does he fit here better than Marvin? Always been my question. I think he’d have a harder time fitting than Jamal Crawford, who many think will be a problem.

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:27 am

Nire ,

Awwwww, come on now. Glenn Robinson’s career numbers: 20.7 ppg, 6.1 rpg, 2.7 apg, and 1.2 spg.

Now you KNOW that if we were getting THESE kinds of numbers out of Marvin, REGARDLESS of how his defense was, three things would happen:

1)You’d be singing “I told you so” loud enough to wake the dead in Arlington Cemetary (God bless their souls).

2) Rod would get committed to a facility for attempted suicide (kidding Rod..I think ;) ).

3)Billy Knight would still have a job.

But I know, I know. Robinson never was a starter on a championship squad…;)

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
12:33 am

Ray,

As for CP3 and winning, you know my theory – when a PG is your best scorer, you don’t win titles. Not in the modern NBA. I admit it’s just a theory, but with the way defense is played these days, you can’t afford to focus your whole offense on one player.

My broader point is that it’s much, much, much harder to find strong, quick big men with lots of heart like Horford than it is to find talented swingmen (like Roy) or even talented PGs (like CP3 or Deron). And more to the point, every title winning team from the past 30 years has had an imposing defensive presence in the middle (be it a giant like Hakeem/Kareem/Shaq, or a Ben Wallace/Horace Grant/Dennis Rodman shorter-but-tough-as-nails PF/C type). I think Horford is very, very close to being that kind of player. And honestly? There are very, very few players I can think of that I would trade Horford for – and stars though they may be, I would have to think long and hard about trading him even for a CP3 or Deron or Roy.

Yeah, getting Horford was mostly luck. But it wasn’t entirely luck. Our odds of “winning” the lottery were proportionate to how bad our record was in 06-07. Give us CP3 or Deron or Roy, and I think we’re at worst in the bottom of the lottery or (more likely since this is the East) in the playoffs. Either way, we don’t get the ping pong ball that went to the 4th worst team in the league, which is what netted us the #3 pick and Horford.

I never said it was by design – quite the contrary, I explicitly said that it was NOT by design. But the players you get in the NBA and whether they pan out is always based largely on luck. And we might have used up all our luck had we gotten CP3 or Deron or Roy, and we’d be desperately scouring now for a way to get a guy like Horford – through “luck” or otherwise.

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:35 am

Hee hee…similarly, if Marvin was putting up Gay’s numbers for the last two years, I seriously doubt we’d be calling him a Glenn Robinson clone.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
12:40 am

Big Ray,

You gotta be kidding me. You know me better than that. I put about as much stock into a player’s box score stats as I do into astrology (read: none). That’s why my favorite guys in the NBA are the Shane Battiers and Bruce Bowens who help their teams win in ways that NEVER show up in stats. And why I was pushing for Woody to play Mario more this past year despite the fact that he’d never create a blip in the box score.

If Marvin were putting up those numbers without playing good D, I absolutely would not be singing his praises or saying “I told you so.” Remember that back in the day, I never defended Marvin as a player; I only defended Knight’s decision to draft him (you remember all my “hindsight is 20/20″ arguments – which most certainly were NOT complementary to Marvin as a player).

The reason I finally got off the fence about Marvin as a player was because he started playing good D. Take that away, and I would not be counting myself among the people who were pushing for Sund to re-sign Marvin to a long-term deal.

And with that, I sign off for the night…

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
12:45 am

Ray, I just hit you up.

Ray & Nire, I love Rudy(My favorite young player in the leauge right now…outside of Teague of course) But That just an ongoing joke with me. Te reality is, Marvin locks Rudy up EVERTYIME we play memphis. I think Rudy had 11pts the last time he drew Marv as a defender…and Marvin is my boy they guy is a Foul magnet, and I love his stroke(I shoot just like him….strong midrange, OK 3pt…..if only his handle was as nice is mine….oh well). That 31 he droped on Melo is still fresh in my head(Melo fired him up with all that trash talk….SBD Marv didn’t say a word either).

Honestly, I wouldnt trade Marv for Rudy right now……but he IS slated to be a RFA this summer…anyhoo. But I will say that Rudy’s Gonna be on my 2K10 roster!! I always put my favorite player on the roster(wht happend to you vince?), without subtracting anyone either lol.

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:49 am

Nire! ,

Why do you keep talking about trading Horford for those guys?? Come one man, we’re talking about draft here, not trading KNOWN products.

“As for CP3 and winning, you know my theory – when a PG is your best scorer, you don’t win titles. Not in the modern NBA. I admit it’s just a theory, but with the way defense is played these days, you can’t afford to focus your whole offense on one player.”

You know I’m with you on that, but that argument is based on team structure, not the player.

CP3 is the best scorer on his team because he MUST be. Who, since his entry to the NBA, have the Hornets had that could have been a better scorer? Conversely, Deron Williams plays on a team that currently has a guy who can bear a bigger or at least equal share of the scoring burden, in Boozer. CP3 has NEVER had that luxury. David West was his best bet, and as good as West is, he’s not that good. Stojakovich’s game fell off, so there went another option. CP3 leads that team the way he does because he MUST.

I mean, we’re not talking about a guy who is a selfish ballhog. The guy averages 10 assists a game. You think Joe has to do everything? Look at the Hawks, then look at the Hornets. Tell me Paul hasn’t had to do EVERYTHING. Is it not possible that if you put him on a different team….maybe he doesn’t have to be the top scorer? Or are you saying he will demand to be that kind of player? I don’t think he would, but that’s just my opinion. The guy is a competitor. And here’s what I think: eventually, he will want to win bad enough. And if New Orleans doesn’t put him and that team in a better position to do that, he’s gone. Money talks. But it doesn’t say everything.

“But the players you get in the NBA and whether they pan out is always based largely on luck.”

I agree, and I don’t agree. I hope you mean just by way of draft. But if you do, then you could also use that line of thinking to conclude that all of the GMs in the league are of equal skill, since it’s based largely on luck. Maybe that’s splitting hairs, but it’s not hard to do based on that statement. But if you don’t limit that statement to the draft alone, then you’ve opened up the flood gates. Here’s an example: the Lakers have won a few titles in the last decade.

It must have been mostly luck that brought Shaq, Kobe, and Gasol to L.A., three guys who helped them win rings. Because..uh…L.A. didn’t draft a single one of those guys.

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:50 am

Ariose ,

Got your message. I returned it within a couple of minutes, so check that one too. Yeah, yeah, I know…I’m giving you a workout, LOL!

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
12:58 am

Yeah, okay Nire . ;)

In all of your arguments defending Billy’s decision to draft him, you talked about all the experts’ statements and draft positioning, all based on Marvin’s potential to be what? A superstar. Not once did I read or hear a single thing about his potential to be a “defensive stopper”. Not a single peep about him being anything like Battier or Bowen. Not from you. Not from the experts. So what were you basing your defense of Knight’s draft choice on then? You said it yourself (and I say it again): superstardome.

Marvin’s defense didn’t come into the equation until a need to validate his existence in the starting lineup and his role with the team, once he came under fire for not turning into the…superstar…that he was expected to be, based on his draft position. Yep.

And you know what? there’s nothing wrong with that! :)

WTF!!!

October 1st, 2009
1:31 am

Ariose
September 30th, 2009
11:25 pm

WTF!!, you seem a lil angry bruh o_0. How bout’ you take your own advice and chill. Pop a couple bottles and DROWN YO SELF FOO!!!

NOW LOOK WHOS IN THERE FEELINGS, U MUST DONT GET KNO A** U TO BUSY JACKIN OFF ON THIS BLOG SITE, U MIGHT BE A DOWN LOW BROTHER JUST LIKE THE REST OF THESE A.T.GAYLIENS, JOE WILL GET MONEY AND YO BROKE A** WILL BE STILL BLOGGING TO YOUR BOYFRIEND A** FACE!!! BEND OVA!!!

Tagurit

October 1st, 2009
5:41 am

ETOP 2008-09 NBA SALARIES
Highest paid NBA players:

1) Kevin Garnett (Boston) $24,751,934
2)tie Jason Kidd (Dallas) $21,372,000
2)tie Jermaine O’Neal (Toronto) $21,372,000
4) Kobe Bryant (LA Lakers) $21,262,500
5) Shaquille O’Neal (Phoenix) $21,000,000
6)tie Allen Iverson (Detroit) $20,840,625
6)tie. Stephon Marbury (New York) $20,840,625
Tim Duncan (San Antonio) $20,598,704
9) Tracy McGrady (Houston) $20,370,437
10) Ray Allen (Boston) $18,388,430
11) Dirk Nowitzki (Dallas) $18,077,904
12) Paul Pierce (Boston) $18,077,903
13) Shawn Marion (Miami) $17,810,000
14) Rashard Lewis (Orlando) $16,447,871
15) Michael Redd (Milwaukee) $15,780,000
16)tie Pau Gasol (LA Lakers) $15,106,000
16)tie. Andrei Kirilenko (Utah) $15,106,000
18)tie. Amare Stoudemire (Pho.) $15,070,550
18)tie Yao Ming (Houston) $15,070,550
20) Mike Bibby (Atlanta) $14,983,603

ONCE MORE TRUTH SERUM IS FACED WITH THE REAL TRUTH AND LOOKS LIKE A COMPLETE MORON, STICKING BOTH FEET IN HIS MOUTH AND FORCED TO HOP AROUND ON HIS BUTT FOR TRANSPORTATION. SINCE HIS BUTT IS NOW THE METHOD OF TRANSPORTATION, HIS EXCRETORY SYSTEM NO LONGER WORKS PROPERLY, THIS EXPLAINS WHY HE IS FULL OF SH!T. :0

Tagurit

October 1st, 2009
5:51 am

OKAY SO JJ IS LEAVING BECAUSE HE KNOWS WE DON’T HAVE A CHAMPIONSHIP LEVEL CENTER, THAT IS SO STUPID. SEEMS LIKE HE WOULD HAVE FIGURED THAT OUT LONG BEFORE 5 YEARS PASSED AND ASKED FOR A TRADE ALREADY. JJ AND WOODY WERE THE GUYS WHO TURNED THE HAWKS AROUND BUT NO CHAMPIONSHIP. WELL IF WE HAVE TO HAVE A CHAMPIONSHIP LEVEL CENTER THEN WHY WE NEED WOODY AND JJ. WE SHOULD TRADE BOTH FOR A CHAMPIONSHIP LEVEL CENTER THEN RIGHT? YOU SO STUPID TRUTH SERUM.

flea

October 1st, 2009
6:12 am

can we trade JJ for KMART + THOMPSON/HAWES? we’re not even sure if JJ have any intentions to re-sign so its better to trade him than lose him for nothing. anyway this team proved that we can still win games without JJ. Remember last season that marvin step up when JJ got injured and maybe you’ll noticed that we had a BETTER BALL MOVEMENT without him. all marvin needs is a chance to prove himself that he’s capable of taking over this team without JJ and besides i think KMART is capable of filling the void offensively cause he’s a better 3 pt shooter than JJ and he’s more aggressive in attacking the basket. he may not possess the kobe moves and may not be as flashy as JJ but he’s just as solid and more consistent and we have crawford to back him up who’s capable of scoring big and distributing the ball like JJ maybe the only thing that we’re really going to miss is JJ’s defense and we’re also going to have either HAWES/THOMPSON who looks to be a young promising big man who can still improve and help us. i think we’re a similar situation with philly when they still have AI and after they lost him most analyst thought that the sixers are finished but whoever expected that iggy will step up after they lost AI. i can see marvin doing the same thing if ever we lost JJ. I might be wrong but who knows. we haven’t seen marvin’s full potential yet.

PG- bibby/ teague
SG- crawford/ kmart
SF- marvin/ evans
PF- josh/ thompson?/ joe/
C- al

Dos Hawkquis

October 1st, 2009
7:46 am

BIG RAY, ARIOSE, NIRE, ET AL,

I think that if the Hawks had offered JJ 5/75mil or 6/90, it would have been a GOD FATHER SCENE, the Hawks made him an offer that he COULDN’T refuse. The Hawks made a half-hearted attempt at signing JJ. At any given time a pro player is one play away from a career ending injury, so he has to protect that.

Instead of blaming JJ for not signing the extension, you all should be furious that the ASG didn’t make a SERIOUS and CONCERTED effort to keep JJ. Our rage is misplaced!!

“I don’t always watch basketball, but when I do, I prefer the Hawks. Stay thirsty my friends!”

SNM

October 1st, 2009
8:21 am

Who cares about these filthy rich….greedy….self centered cry babies!!!! All they want it more more more money….this is one reason I hate and I mean HATE most pro sports. They aren’t team players at all, but more concerned about what’s in it for them….how well they do….how many points they score….blah blah blah. The only true sports professionals who really have to earn their money play tennis, golf…..where they usually don’t make much unless they play well day in and day out. The other sports can turn lack luster athletes into millionaires over night….I would love to play any sport today for the bare minimum….I would immediately gain a 300% pay increase or better….I think I could live on that and be quite happy….but since most pro athletes feel that somebody owes them something…that just is note enough….bring on college games….at least they play with enthusiasm and heart….not for money…..I’m finished ranting!!!!

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
8:27 am

Dos Hawkquis ,

I’m not enraged at all. And why should we be furious that the ASG “only” offered JJ a contract that, while one year shorter than the last one, pays an average of $1 million more a year? How is a raise insulting? This is a business. You NEVER put your best or final offer on the table right away.

Which brings me to another point. I’ve heard many times from more than one person that over the years (specifically post-Jordan domination era), almost no team won the NBA championship without a dominant or very influential big man. Okay, so why is it that some of those same people are clamoring that is either a max contract or near-max contract worthy player? Why all the noise about him deserving and guaranteed to get $16-$18 million a year from somebody, if not from the Hawks? If it’s the world-beating big man that matters, then WHY oh WHY all the hue and cry about a 2-guard that isn’t even the best at his position? How do you reconcile the two lines of thought? I’m not even sure I want to hear the spin job on this one….

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
8:33 am

SNM,

Tennis and golf? Tennis and golf. Tennis and golf?

You have a point about personal performance, as those are for the most part NOT team sports. And golf is the only “sport” where you can be well and truly WAY past your prime, and still play professionally. Hell, they even have a tournament for you if you’re truly ancient.

As for tennis, after the days of Agassi and Sampras, I just ceased to give a rat’s arse. To hell with it. Although, I can’t hate on the women (some of them are hotter than Lamar Odom’s Visa card, now that he’s married one of the Kardashians).

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
8:35 am

In the 8:27 a.m. post, meant to read “okay so why is it that some of those same people are clamoring that JJ is a max or near max contract worthy player”….

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
8:40 am

Good grief this blog sometimes gets as bad as the Falcons blog.
Big Ray- I am going to have to disagree with you on your 10:11 post. Obviously, since I am the one that wrote the opinion that there are several teams that will give Joe 16-18mil per a year.
Yes, the market has taken a downturn, but with several teams like the Knicks, Nets, Suns… possibly Clevland and Miami, that have sold their fan bases that they have been making moves for the next off season HAVE to get something done. That is five teams and there are only two legit stars (Lebron and Wade) to be had. Joe and Bosh will be the next two guys out of the shoot. The economy will have an effect on the mid tier player/ vet min guy, much like it did with Joe Smith and Bibby this past off season. But, Joe will get offers, not saying they won’t be offers that the Hawks can’t or won’t match, but they will be better than his extension offer from the Hawks.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
8:44 am

Also, I don’t hear a lot of “hate” for Joe on this site. Yes, there are a couple, but I suspect they are all the same person, who is having a conversation with himself.
I think most of us realize that it is the smart business decision for Joe. Not, the best decision for us as fans (that would be for him to play for free). Also, the ASG, made a reasonable start offer so I am not upset with them either.
It will mean that our next summer will have some serious drama, but it will not affect this season at all.

dap01

October 1st, 2009
8:46 am

I like what Woodson is saying. I like what everyone on the team is saying. We have options in the front court and the backcourt. We have a good team now with the veterans and we have good young prospects. We are in good shape with the salary cap. We have good character guys on the team who are likable. We have players who have yet to reach their potential. Why are we so down and why are we debating things that really dont matter.

We could blosson into an elite team.

Thanks for the info, Sekou. I look forward to every nugget of information that you give.

Go Hawks.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
8:54 am

dap01- totally agree with you on liking what Woodson has been saying.
btw-dang, I was starting to believe…. well, see you on the Braves blog in the off season.

Wanted to throw something out there, Love the Sekou piece on Jamal. We have had a couple of bloggers from NY and GS come in and tell us to not expect too much from Jamal. They say that he is great guy and always comes in “saying all the right things”. I know that will have to just wait and see to find out the truth. But, do you guys think that we are seeing a different Crawford(playing defense!!) or are we buying into to the usual preseason hype?

I am not offering an opinion either way. Just wanted to get your guys take on the situation.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
9:05 am

Ray,

The spin is pretty easy on that one – the “big man” I was talking about is necessary, but far FAR from sufficient. If that were all that was needed, guys like Karl Malone and Deke wouldn’t have retired without a title. The big man is one piece, and it’s actually not usually the most expensive piece (Grant, Rodman, and Ben Wallace were not the highest-paid players on their teams; even Dwight Howard makes less than Rashard). All of the title-winning teams of the past two decades except for the ‘99/’03 Spurs also had an All-Star caliber wing player (Dumars, Jordan, Drexler, Kobe, Rip/Tayshaun, Wade, Pierce/Allen). And even the ‘99 Spurs had the not-so-long-ago All-Star wing Sean Elliott.

No one said that a world-beating big man is ALL that matters. It’s just a necessary piece. And the rest of the pieces aren’t going to come cheap, at least not if you want to win a title. Just ask the Magic – they’re paying Rashard Lewis $120M, which seems like “overpaying” until you consider that they’d never have won 60 games or made it to the Finals without him.

glenn

October 1st, 2009
9:07 am

He’ll be back . He’s not a New York kind of guy . He’s southern & low key . After taxes he wouldn’t have any advantage unless he made it up in endorsements . Like I said, he is low key . Another thing , New York & New Jersey aren’t winning anything anytime soon . JJ gets to prove he should get more & I hope he does . There is something no one has mentioned . Joe Johnson hand picked this franchise when he was in Phoenix . The Hawks were considered a joke when he got here . How quickly we forget how much ridicule JJ got for wanting to leave the high flying Suns for the disfunctional Hawks . This franchise was a bigger mess all the way around . But guess what ? This is the team he wanted to play for . The Hawks are now a young contender & he is the leader of the team . So he wants to earn a fifth year . I hope he does .

KevinA

October 1st, 2009
9:49 am

It’s a good thing we can agree on nothing. The offer to JJ was higher than I think he is worth. Why? Looking out over the next three years.

The cap will be smaller.
Owners losing 20 million a year.
Al will need a raise.
Chills needs to be signed next year.
Bibby will have to be replaced (if Teague comes through, this concern will be relieved)
Joe Smith/Collins are old and how long and how cheap can we play these guys.
ZaZa and Evans are good but not good enough.

Signing JJ for more than 14 million per year will crimp future moves in all of these areas. JJ can change his style of play and become the 16-17 million dollar man. He still needs to prove it by turning Josh/Marvin and Al into more dangerous options resulting in a much higher efficient offense. If that does not happen we can’t afford that high of a contract.

Let’s say he shot FG% of .460, made 23 pt’s per game, added an assist per game, drove more and got fouled more, added an assist per game, lowered his turn over ratio half a point, all with playing 36 min per game. Then pay the man the money.

macaroni tony

October 1st, 2009
9:55 am

Not Looking Good

Stan Van Gundy Takes Vince Carter to Task Defensively

It didn’t take long for Magic coach Stan Van Gundy to let his new star know that no one is immune from his sometimes-biting, often-surprising critique.

Vince Carter — the eight-time All-Star — caught Van Gundy’s wrath Wednesday, just the second day of training camp. Often treated with kid gloves during his time in New Jersey, Carter became the example of what not to do late in the morning practice.

“He (Carter) did not play well defensively today. He didn’t do a good job out there. He’s capable of doing a lot better, and that’s what I want to see,” Van Gundy said. “As a matter of fact, we’ll talk to him about that and show him some (film) clips tomorrow.”

Van Gundy was particularly upset when Carter fell asleep on one defensive possession, allowing J.J. Redick to catch and score on a back-door play.

“No, I’m not surprised (about Van Gundy’s criticism),” Carter said when told of Van Gundy’s assessment. “You can have 12 turnovers (and nothing is said) with him, but you let one guy go back-door and get caught looking, he’ll let you have it. I won’t make that mistake again.”

Carter, now going into his 12th NBA season, was obtained in a trade from New Jersey this summer. He is the one expected to put the Magic over the top after they lost badly in the NBA Finals in June.

“He did not play with great focus, particularly near the end of the scrimmage,” Van Gundy said. “He just didn’t do as good a job as I know he’s capable of. He’s a smart guy and capable of being good defensively. He wasn’t at that level today. I think he would tell you that, too.”

Dos Hawkquis

October 1st, 2009
9:57 am

BIG RAY,

All that I am saying is, if the Hawks had presented a 5/75 or 6/90, this would have scared other teams off or they really will have to come with it. Do you play poker? You can bluff the hell out of someone, make them fold with a pair of Queens and you have an Ace/King.

I don’t think that any team out there would come higher than 6/90 for JJ. This lets JJ, your fan base, and other teams know that you are serious!!

Like Beyonce says, Hawks should have “put a ring on it.” 6/90 is definitely a “ring.”

“I don’t always watch basketball, but when I do, I prefer the Hawks. Stay thirsty my friends!”

macaroni tony

October 1st, 2009
10:00 am

Will Joe Johnson’s Future Be in Atlanta?

Posted Sep 30, 2009 12:30PM By Matt Moore (RSS feed)

Since arriving in Atlanta in 2005, Joe Johnson has been the resident star of the Hawks. Josh Smith draws the oohs and aahs with the highlight reel dunks and eye-popping stat lines, but Johnson has been the only player to really approach greatness, his finest moment coming in the 2007 playoffs, which we mentioned a few days ago.

It’s long been expected that Johnson would sign an extension within the last few weeks, to lock him up with the Hawks for the forseeable future, without any question of him going elsewhere in the summer of 2010.

Turns out: not so much.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports today that Johnson has elected not to sign the extension the Hawks have offered and will become a free agent next summer. In doing so, Johnson has rejected a four-year, $60 million offer from the Hawks, which is kind of a lot of dough. You could make a lot of pizzas with that. You could feed all the Ninja Turtles pizza, including Michelangelo, almost a dozen times with that much dough. And Johnson feels he can do better.

Though Johnson has an impressive set of skills, being able to play as a shooting guard running point as well as filling time at the the three in a pinch, it’s hard to argue with his age (he’ll be 29 when he hits the market next year), minutes, and history that he’s worth a max-max-max contract. He was 13th in scoring this year, and had an abysmal playoff run, especially when compared to the year before. It’s hard to see teams lining up offers the same way they will for LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and others in the ‘10 free agent class.

Still, even if the offers are dimmed for Johnson more than he seems, electing not to sign the extension may have been the best move. If he and his agent can generate a perception that the interest is out there, he can translate that into a bigger contract from the Hawks, which is probably a pretty likely scenario. Hawks blog Peachtree Hoops outlines the possibilities for Johnson and comes to much the same conclusion, though they’re hoping Johnson signs for less money.

There are other options, though, if we whip out our crystal ball.

New York is obviously focusing all its intentions on LeBron. But in order to lure him to the Big Apple, they’ll need someone else to show as his sidekick. You know, the player that the Cavs have failed to provide him with since he was drafted. Signing Johnson would pretty much make it so that as long as they have a breathing point guard (which is essentially all Chris Duhon is), and anything resembling a frontcourt that can just rebound (kind of like the Cavs have now), James will not only be facing the lure of the bright lights of the city, but a solid chance to compete with a talented and flexible roster IF Johnson signs.

If you’re opting for the smaller markets, there’s Charlotte or Minnesota. Both teams will have at least some cap space (depending on what the Bobcats do with Raja Bell and Raymond Felton), and signing Johnson would fill their most obvious need at small guard. Minnesota presents a young talented roster that figures to be on the rise over the next few years, with a glaring hole at two-guard. Minnesota also will have the money to throw at Johnson. Cold winters may not spark the interest of Arkansas’ sixth or seventh favorite son, though.

There are other options if you put your imagination to the test (Boston, Houston, and Chicago to name a few), but the most likely scenario is still Atlanta. He’s built a home and identity there, and if he can’t drum up the interest elsewhere, making a home there could be his only option. It’s a gamble Johnson has made, and this year represents his only chance to improve his odds.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
10:21 am

I’ve read Moore’s stuff. I hope no one’s paying him to write stuff. Like Kelly Dwyer on Yahoo, he decides early on what players/teams he likes and what players/teams he doesn’t. Once he decides, it doesn’t really matter what happens thereafter. He has no NBA contacts and is basically just an outsider fan….kinda like me – someone with an interest in basketball and way too much time on his hands. Except he thinks his rants deserve to be featured on a widely-read site and I realize that my drivel should be reserved for the comments section of my favorite team’s blog.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
10:44 am

glenn- I hope you are right.
dos- I think you are right, and he will probably end up with a 5th year/6th option (75/90 mil.) which is good money and the smart move.

Dos Hawkquis

October 1st, 2009
11:03 am

DANIEL,

I think that if the Hawks presented that and JJ didn’t sign it, the backlash would be warranted. Everyone would have called him nuts to turn that down. Then he would look like a fool. 5/75 or 6/90 is about what he is going to get. I don’t see him getting a dollar more than that.

“I don’t always watch basketball, but when I do, I prefer the Hawks. Stay thirsy my friends.”

Drewcat

October 1st, 2009
11:15 am

Joe did the right thing by rejecting the deal and I’ll tell you why.

This summer’s free agency is a player’s market as Sekou mentioned. With at least a dozen teams with capable of offering max dollars, the amount of max dollar talent DOES NOT outweigh the number of teams offering the big money. SO in this case, even with all the JJ anti-superstar campaigns, Joe may still have enough leverage to get a better deal that the one originally offered by the Hawks.

I still believe that Joe will re-sign with ATL for a few reasons:

1) The Hawks showed their loyalty to their star player by being proactive and attempting to re-sign Joe at the earliest possible time. That shows commitment.

2) The Hawks will still have cap flexibility to offer Joe more money (if he exceeds expectations this season, and plays beyond what we think he’s capable of). With Collier, Joe Smith, Mo Evans, RandMo all coming off the books and a decision to be made about Horford’s contract extension the Hawks remain intact financially.

3) Joe can get it done here! To all the haters who believe that there’s no way we can win without a legitimate center, and that Horford is playing out of position: STOP! This team has cohesion and experience playing together. They are playoff tested and improve perennially. Joe’s an All-Star and with the emergence of Josh Smith, we have two guys who can take over games. Also, we have veterans who can weather the storm.

Joe did the right thing by rejecting the offer, but HE WILL BE BACK. This is his team and he knows it. We’re moving in the right direction. Go Hawks!

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
11:15 am

The fifth year is what’s key more than the dollar amount. This is going to be the last big-money contract JJ can get. He will want to be secured at least 5 years. You never, ever see All-Stars settling for a 4-year deal at this stage in their careers.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
11:33 am

Dos- I agree with you. But, I also understand the ASG plan as well. They made an reasonable(although low ball in terms of years offer) as a starting point. We don’t know how much discussion went on between the two to see if Joe asked for another year, or if he just decided to not drag it out now and wait for this off season when he has all the leverage.

I am going to go with that they do come to agreement next summer in the neighborhood of a 5 year deal with 6th year option for a 90 milion if the option is kicked in.

rms

October 1st, 2009
11:58 am

Any updates as far as what is actually happening on the court during training camp. Getting tired of reading speculation about what a player should or shouldnt do, lets get to the real action. There is a preseason game tonite and I know the Hawks start next week some time. I know preseason is nothing to get excited about but its better than reading about players playing against themselves. Of course they would look good. Lets see them play against better athletes and real defensive schemes!!

A Tribe Called Quest

October 1st, 2009
12:00 pm

Why is everyone so surprised that Jamal Crawford can pass?

THE GUY HAS AVERAGED 4+ ASSISTS FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS. THAT’S ALMOST AS MUCH AS OUR STARTING POINT GUARD

A Tribe Called Quest

October 1st, 2009
12:02 pm

“Why there’s more animosity directed at the player that declines an extension than to the team that declines to sign a player to an extension ”

Who says that? I think we were all pissed Smoove wasn’t extended 2 summers ago

A Tribe Called Quest

October 1st, 2009
12:07 pm

As someone said on Hawksquawk, by Joe declining this extension, he adds the 5th year for 2014 where he can make 18 mill — 3 times as much as he’d make if he took 4 years and signed a deal after that.

Savvy move

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
12:35 pm

fudd21

October 1st, 2009
12:56 pm

J Smooth DID NOT sign the extension that was offered to him 5/$45 before he became a restricted free agent 2 years ago. I don’t remember anyone on this blog calling him selfish. So why is JJ being called selfish now. Some of the comments on this blog are AMAZING to me.

Lebron, D Wade, C Bosh, Kobe among other stars (ESPN has a whole list of people who will be free agents next year) have not signed extensions. Are they selfish too? The fact of the matter is several teams have made room to sign a big name free agent next year. Only a few of them will be able to. Those teams that don’t will definitely look JJ up. He then will have to make a decision (based on whatever his criteria is) as to what is the best option for him. It’s the same thing any of us would do when it comes to our own profession!

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
12:59 pm

Read this article and search for YouTube videos of this kid:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091001/ap_on_sp_co_ne/bkc_one_handed_player

Great form on his shot, great timing on D. He might turn a few heads in the MAAC….

Kellie J

October 1st, 2009
1:13 pm

I hope leverage is the only reason. I would be disappointed if he left! The Hawks have improved every year since he arrived, and he has been a huge part and reason for that upward swing! I’m hopeful things will work out and Joe will remain a Hawk and as a Hawks fan I don’t want him to go, however I’m also a fan of his and if a better deal and opportunity comes along I wish him the best!

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
1:16 pm

Ariose- thanks for the link. I have been a Woodson supporter on here for awhile. I think he takes a lot of blame that is underserved (some that is). I also think that consistency has helped this team to develop together. However, what does race have to do with it? So if you happen to be one of the people that don’t like Woodson, then you are being racist? (that is suggested all the time on here by one particular blogger)
Seems to me the fact that Woodson is one of the longer tenured coaches in the NBA after only 5 years is more a testament to the league’s and sports in general’s trend toward WIN NOW, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR ME LATELY, and the fact that the ASG have shown patience. Although, the article didn’t mention that his GM (who was also Black) tried to fire him. But, I guess they don’t want to let the facts get in the way of a good assumption or at least an easy story.
Mike Woodson and his career deserve more attention than from a writer trying to shoe horn racial politics onto his story.
Ultimately, what is more harmful?

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
1:20 pm

Maybe I am reading a different blog, but who keeps saying that Joe Johnson is selfish?
why do we keep having reactions to things that don’t exist?

This is very much like when we had a couple of bloggers insisting that we not get too excited about Jamal Crawford, when all the discussion about Jamal was very realistic.

Is it just me?

NON MENTAL

October 1st, 2009
1:33 pm

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
12:40 am

” And why I was pushing for Woody to play Mario more this past year despite the fact that he’d never create a blip in the box score.”

I SEE WHY YOU ARE CALLED NON MENTAL. YOU OFTEN CORRECT BLOGGER FOR SYNTAX. I HOPE YOU LEARN TO MAKE AN COMPLETE SENTENCE. EITHER USE THIS CONJECTURE IN A COMPOUND SENTENCE OR DROP THE “AND WHY AND MAKE IT A COMPLETE SENTENCE. FLATTER DEEZ NUTTZ.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
9:05 am

The big man is one piece, and it’s actually not usually the most expensive piece (Grant, Rodman, and Ben Wallace were not the highest-paid players

“THE BIG MAN” USUALLY REFERS TO THE CENTER NOT THE POWER FORWARDS OR SMALL FORWARDS, NON MENTAL/TAGUIT. NIETHER GRANT NOR RODMAN WERE CENTERS. YOU HAVE A NON MENTAL HABIT OF CONFUSING THE POWER FORWARD POSITION WITH THE CENTER POSITION.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
1:34 pm

Daniel,

Uh…did you read any of the posts on the last 3 pages of Sekou’s last blog? Here’s just a few of examples of people calling JJ selfish, usually explicitly but sometimes using slightly different words:
http://blogs.ajc.com/hawks/2009/09/28/all-smiles-hawks-media-day/comment-page-2/#comment-31559

Replace the “31559″ in that URL with the following tags to find some other ones in the same vein:
31567
31573
31587
31596
31633
31653
31658
31665

And even on this blog, Sautee explicitly called JJ selfish.

So yeah…these are not reactions to phantom posts.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
1:37 pm

Sautee called JJ selfish? HMMM… I didn’t see it, but I believe you.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
1:41 pm

The rest of the comments about selfish came from these “pop up names” like Mario West, …., no name, etc. which just feels like one person trying to stir something up.

Maybe somebody stole Sautee’s name, I didn’t think he would make that call.

Daniel

October 1st, 2009
1:44 pm

Nire- Sautee was calling Joe selfish for not coming out of the game when he was exhausted, and not trusting in his teammates. Totally different point than calling Joe selfish for not signing the Hawks’ extension offer.

SMELL MY FEET

October 1st, 2009
1:49 pm

Tagurit/DANIEL

October 1st, 2009
5:41 am

Tagurit/DANIEL

October 1st, 2009
5:51 am

WHEN YOU CLOSE YOUR MOUTH I WONDER ARE YOU STUPID. WHEN YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH THERE IS NO DOUBT YOU ARE STUPID. YOU WAKE UP VERY EARLY TO SHOW YOUR IGNORANCE @SS BREATH. HOW LONG HAVE YOU SMELLED LIKE THAT? IS THERE A CURE? DID IT TAKE ALL OF YOUR BRAIN POWER TO COPY AND PASTE THE LIST FROM THE PREVIOUS PAGE? DID YOU HAVE A POINT IN DOING SO THAT YOU CARE TO ENLIGHTEN ME? WHATS BETWEEN YOU AND MR TRUTH SERUM IS BETWEEN YOU TWO. PLEASE LEAVE ME OUT. BTW YOUR RATIONAL ABOUT WOODSON AND JOE NOT BEING KEY PIECES TO THE HAWKS EMERGENCE IS OBVIOUSLY WRONG AND STUPID. DIC BREATH!

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
1:51 pm

Truth-serum (currently masquerading as “non-mental”),

“Big man” can refer to power forwards or centers, depending on the context. In some contexts, people do use “big men” to refer to centers only. But that’s not the way I was using it, and many casual fans and sportwriters use the term “big man” to include PFs. For example:
http://hoopshype.com/players/chris_bosh.htm

Also, lots of teams have one coach for the “wings” and another for the “bigs,” and the “bigs” include both the Cs and PFs. For example, read Seven Seconds or Less, Jack McCallum’s wonderful book on…

Oh wait. It’s a book. And this is you we’re talking about. Nevermind.

Actually, I rarely correct bloggers for spelling and grammar. And I never correct for syntax, because there are no rules for governing syntax. My point about syntax was always that you always use the same syntax when you post as different people, which makes it easy to tell when you’re pulling one of your painfully un-clever attempts to fool people into thinking that some people actually agree with you.

But I will say this – it’s pretty funny that in your effort to correct my grammar, you misused the words “syntax,” misused the singular with “blogger,” misused the word conjecture (I think you mean conjunction), misused “an” instead of “a,” and forgot to include a close quote after “AND.”

In any case, I often use (as do other casual writers) less than complete sentences for stylistic effect when I’m emphasizing a point. In other words, I departed from the “rules” of writing ettiquette by design. You do it because you’re an idiot.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
1:52 pm

Daniel,

I only posted the more obvious ones. You can read between the lines of a lot of the other posts on there and see that the same sentiment was expressed (though not necessarily insomany words) by more than a few people…

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
1:54 pm

*word syntax

The Flash

October 1st, 2009
1:55 pm

Money’s worth? You are kidding, right. If they didn’t sign JJ, then they had to have signed Roy, right? Anyone here prefer to have JJ rather than Roy? I didn’t think so. Some of us, me and Doc, thought any sane person would have chosen Roy anyway. But, without JJ, it would have been a must.

Now, without JJ those first two seasons, how much worser could the Hawks have been? So, you’d have had a much less expensive Roy who will become a restricted free agent and be yours for the future, as against where you are now.

Come on, Sekou, do the math. The signing in retrospect, which lead to a pass on a superior backcourt player to JJ in every respect, adds up precisely in opposition to what you propound, that management got its money’s worth. Of course, since management signed JJ thinking he’d be the next Magic, we’re talking Paul or Williams instead of Marvin, and one of them and Roy in the backcourt would, I believe, be THE BEST IN THE FREAKIN LEAGUE. Where is Andoman when a person needs him.

That said JJ played well. Whether he actually has fostered or impeded the growth of the young players around him, however, seems to me to be a matter open to debate. The guy does hold the ball an awful lot. Playing with a guy who does that does not allow anyone around him to maximize his potential, anyone.

Unless JJ shows some ability to play the game without holding it, my guess is that he will be surprised come open season. The Hawks under Sund seem to finally be getting it right.

NON MENTAL

October 1st, 2009
1:56 pm

TRUE, I FORGOT TO CLOSE THE QUOTATION. I CAN ADMIT WHEN IM WRONG. MOST SLEAZY VARMITS TRY TO COVER IT UP AND CALL IT STYLE. BUTT FACE.

NON MENTAL

October 1st, 2009
1:58 pm

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
1:54 pm
*word syntax

SOME MORE STYLE HUH BUTT FACE?

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
2:35 pm

Playing with a guy who does that does not allow anyone around him to maximize his potential, anyone.

People keep saying this as if JJ was the one drawing up “plays” that consisted of him in isolation and his teammates standing on the other side of the court not moving. Anyone who looks at JJ’s career progression from Phoenix to here would have to be blind if they didn’t admit that JJ is not a ‘natural ballhog’. He played a complementary role well in Phoenix where he often gave up the ball to his teammates (when he wasn’t the best player on his team), and showed no problem passing the ball in his first year here (when he was). Then Harrington left and Woody started calling the ISO plays en masse. And THAT is when people started calling JJ a ballhog (and yet somehow insufficiently assertive).

And PS – I would say JJ and Roy are a wash. I think they have very, VERY similar skill sets and their relative strengths cancel each other out – Roy is marginally quicker, JJ is marginally stronger; JJ is better posting up and shooting from the perimeter, Roy is better taking it to the rack; to get even more specific, Roy is better starting from the top of the key, and JJ is better starting near the baseline (which makes sense considering that’s where he spent a lot of his time in Phoenix). I don’t think either has a clear edge…especially when you consider the gargantuan difference in coaching quality that each has (Roy is always rested and plays within a ball-movement and off-ball movement focused offense).

I’ve talked to my Blazer-fan girlfriend about this PLENTY because we watch most of both teams’ games, and she actually thinks JJ is the better player (at least as of right now). Her gripes: Roy disappears for long stretches at a time, has a tendency to ignore open teammates, and has played less defense ever since he emerged as a star on offense. Sound familiar? I guess the grass is always greener…

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
2:37 pm

Heh – this sentence was meant to be included in my opening quote of The Truth:

The guy does hold the ball an awful lot. Playing with a guy who does that does not allow anyone around him to maximize his potential, anyone.

cp

October 1st, 2009
3:44 pm

What happened to this blog? It’s starting to look like the foolishness that has haunted those Falcons blogs.

jerrywest

October 1st, 2009
3:50 pm

From Truehoop:

“David Thorpe cautions against reading too much into individual defensive ratings, as coaching has such a massive effect. His example: With Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis, Seattle was a bad team. Both players, then, had very bad defensive ratings according to adjusted plus/minus. Yet in the last two years, those same players have been starters (Allen on the 2007/2008 Celtics, Lewis on the 2008/2009 Magic) on the NBA’s best defensive teams, with good defensive ratings. His point: Put a motivated player in a good defensive system, and they’ll perform.”On bad teams, there is often not a good plan,” Thorpe explains. “But get them playing for Tom Thibodeau or Stan Van Gundy, and all kinds of players can master when to go over the screen, when to go under, when to lock and trail, which 3-point shooters to close out, not fouling on shot fakes, when to help from the weakside. … Take the five worst defenders in the league — so long as they’re motivated to be good defenders — and sprinkle them among the Cavaliers, the Magic, the Celtics, the Spurs and the Rockets, and I think you’d be surprised at how effective they could be.’”

Hoosier

October 1st, 2009
4:08 pm

Sekou, you’re not confusing, I see your point. But, my point is that JJ will not beat that offer, and Sund will not better it, so why not look like you are showing some team loyalty and accept the offer?

Then, as far as the fans go, we are always left trying to understand, or “put ourselves in their shoes”, the player’s greed and ego that knows no bounds.

I don’t care how you dice it, it’s sickening, we are talking about $60M here. He is starting to become a selfish player on the court, as well, last year hardly ever passing out of double and triple teams. Once teams learn this, they will five on him!

I prdict JJ will be disappointed next summer, and take this very same offer. Which brings us back to my original point. Sometimes you should just be happy.

newkid

October 1st, 2009
4:15 pm

niremetal, your assertion rings true that JJ gave up the ball in Phoenix to teammates, but the Phoenix chapter is but one in the novel that one has to read if one’s to understand his proclivities with the Hawks. Clearly he was surrounded by talent (much of it superior to his) in Phoenix. I’d argue that if you wish to understand his Hawks behavior, you must look at Joe’s court habits in college and high school where he was clearly the most talented on his side. He did everything for his team in high school (scoring, rebounding, everything); he did just about everything for his team in college. He had too; he was the cream of the crop. For the first four years in Atlanta he must have felt the same, so why wouldn’t he revert to his high school and college habits? He’s not to be ostracized for such habits when it obvious no one else on the side could get it done. Not sure that’s where we are 09/10. The question is does Joe still think he’s the only one on the side capable of carrying the load? Does he want to be the only one on the side carrying the load? Did he leave Phoenix because he wanted to be the only one on the side to carry the load? Just asking.

Enter your comments here

But what do I know

October 1st, 2009
4:45 pm

Niremetal, you have & WTF have to know JJ, i have never seen anyone that doesn’t know someone take up for them like you do! Look, All i saying is The Hawks put JJ on the spot! The already knew that he wasn’t gonna extend his contract before they made the offer! I had heard about it a month ago. so, to me the hawks are the blame for all this mess! Look, JJ is Good for a Hawks Player but he is not an Elite player in this league! When Dwade & Kobe or Lebron or Melo play against each other the challenge is competitve! JOE JOHNSON DOES NOT SHINE UP AGAINST ANY TOP NOTCH PLAYER IN THE NBA! SO HE SHOULD HAVE TAKE THE MONEY! REMEMBER THE HAWKS WERE THE LAUGHING STALK OF THE NBA WHEN THEY SIGNED JJ TO THAT BIG CONTRACT! He is good but HE IS NOT A TRUE ALL STAR IS NO SENSE!!! look at the All Star Roster & ask yourself out of the 3 years that jj made the All Star team what players on the All Star team is JJ better then at shooting guard? As a Hawks fan if you could pick any shooting Guard that you wanted off of JJ’s All Star to be The starting shooting guard for Your Atlanta Hawks! No Hawks Fans Would Pick JOE JOHNSON!!! lol

bigdave

October 1st, 2009
5:55 pm

Joe Johnson> Brandon Roy

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
6:38 pm

Possible Hawks alternate jersey Possible Hawks alternate jersey:

http://www.peachtreehoops.com/2009/10/1/1065004/possible-hawks-alternate-jersey

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
7:05 pm

Ariose, I don’t like the ATL…the letters are so big that they’re distracting.

Hoosier

October 1st, 2009
7:09 pm

It would not be the end of the world, if the Hawks let JJ walk. He was no more of an impact player then Josh, Marvin, and Al are, when he was their age. It is time to let one or two of them take more of a role in the offense (just like Joe did when he came to Atlanta), and see if one of them can shine. None of the three will be superstars, but they can be just as good as JJ.

Who knows, maybe Teague will wind up being our superstar?

Hoops

October 1st, 2009
7:26 pm

JJ will play for the Hawks the entire season and will play great! The Hawks will re-sign him as a FA next summer.

I’m kind of taken back by those people that express hatred toward him for not accepting the Hawks extension offer. It’s business! He feels like he can make more money by waiting. What’s the problem with that? All of us do what we can to make more money at our chosen professions all the time.

I really think that we will see JJ and Crawford on the floor together much more than most people think. The Hawks will be potent with those two Cats together!

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
7:30 pm

The Guys at Hoopinion have an interesting take on the JJ situation:

Brett:

I believe Joe Johnson just kept the organization from shooting itself in the foot.

Karry said…
Bret,
Please explain to me how allowing Joe to go helps us build for a championship? Please give me scenerios( players etc).PLEAASE

1:46 PM, September 30, 2009
Bret LaGree said…
As they’re currently proving, you can’t build a championship team by trading a league average player and two first round picks for the right to pay Joe Johnson a max contract to be a team’s focal point. That’s before one accounts for the very real possibility that Johnson’s presence influenced the team’s decisions not to draft Paul or Deron Williams or Brandon Roy when given the chance.

None of that is Joe Johnson’s fault nor does it mean he’s not a fine basketball. However, I suspect that the wear-and-tear Johnson’s experienced, both in Phoenix and in Atlanta, will cause/has caused him to peak early. If he’s a fringe All-Star at this peak what will his decline phase look like? I wouldn’t pay $60 million for the privilege of discovering that over the course of four potentially long years.

By not signing the extension, Johnson has given the Hawks the opportunity to sign him after the season for fewer years/less money or let him go and invest the money that would have gone to Johnson plus Josh Childress’s rights plus, one hopes, Jamal Crawford’s expiring contract into acquiring a true franchise player or multiple players that will complement the young (and potentially improving) core of Smith, Horford, Williams, and Teague and the reasonably priced veteran role players (Bibby, Pachulia, Evans).

2:40 PM, September 30, 2009
Bronn said…
But if the projections for next year’s cap figures are accurate, we’re going to be over the cap whether JJ is a member of the Hawks, if my math is right.

Of course, that’s assuming there’s no Jamal Crawford trade in the works, and I suspect he’s a huge candidate to be traded.

5:06 PM, September 30, 2009
Bret LaGree said…
No doubt, losing Joe Johnson does not equal cap space in and of itself but one would think that in his absence the team might be motivated to get something for Josh Childress, trade Crawford’s expiring contract (wait, there might be a downside cap-wise to acquiring $19 million worth of Jamal Crawford’s contract), and explore their sign-and-trade options in free agency

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
7:38 pm

Nire, The guys at peachtree hoops made that Jersey up. It’s not an offical one, but I think the next jersey will defenetly be red like that.

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
7:42 pm

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
7:49 pm

What an idiot. Sorry, but “trading” JJ + Crawford for Wade or even LeBron doesn’t get the Hawks a title. The only team that has won a title in the past 30 years that didn’t have at least two All-Stars was Duncan’s Spurs in 2003. Hell, you don’t just need two All-Stars. As a general rule, you need two Hall of Famers who can score 20ppg with their eyes shut. The only exceptions I can think to that rule from the past 30 years are, again, the 2003 Spurs and maybe the 2004 Pistons (do the Wallaces and/or Billups make it to the Hall? Now there’s a topic for debate…). The playoffs are just too deep and too tough for a one-star team to win it all, as Kobe discovered and LeBron is discovering.

Josh will never scare people enough on offense to play Pippen to a Jordan (or Manu to a TD or Drexler to a Hakeem or whatever other title-winning duos you want to throw out there). Sorry, he just won’t. He’s been in the league 5 years, and teams routinely leave him wide open when he’s more than 15 feet from the basket, just daring him to take a mid-range jumper or three. That’s not Josh’s game. Horford never will be a phenomenal offensive weapon either, and I’m saying that as a guy who owns a Horford jersey. Neither will Marvin. And my guess is, neither will Teague (and you don’t really want your PG filling that role anyway). No one else on the team is even worth mentioning.

The answer isn’t getting rid of JJ, just like the answer for the Celtics wasn’t getting rid of Pierce. The answer is keeping your All-Star and finding some way to scrape together the contracts and draft picks to trade for another one who is as good or better. That might mean trading away almost everyone but JJ…same as the Celtics traded away everyone but Pierce and the Heat cleaned out everyone but Wade and Zo.

So anyone talking about letting JJ walk has it backwards. Because in the entire history of the NBA, I can’t think of a single team that has won a title after letting their one and only All-Star go elsewhere.

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
8:00 pm

Nire, I said it was an “Interesting” take lol. I wasn’t endorsing it. I do agree with your thoughts.

Ariose

October 1st, 2009
8:07 pm

We need to sign stackhouse, along with Sims, and Siler. Then We trade Stackhouse, Mo Evans, and Randolph morris and a future(unprotected) 1st Rd. Pick for Rudy Gay.

Then the second unit looks like:

Jeff Teague
Jamal Crawford
Rudy Gay
Joe Smith
Zaza Pachulia

Super Reserves:

Garrett Siler, Jason Collins, and Courtney Sims…..that also gives us space to put Mario Back on the roster(or call him back from the D-Leauge (^_^)

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
8:08 pm

Btw – the good thing about the spate of non-expiring contracts the Hawks will have next summer is that it opens the door to LOTS of sign-and-trade possibilities if we can talk LeBron/Bosh/Wade into coming here.

The thing that LaGree doesn’t seem to get is that without a Pippen-in-waiting, those guys are much less likely to be interested in coming here. Remember – there is absolutely no way that the Hawks will have the cap space next summer to sign Bosh, LeBron, or Wade outright. That means that in order to acquire one of them, we would have to both convince the player to come here AND convince their current team to work out a sign-and-trade with us where we give up about the salary that we give away.

For instance, we could convince Bosh to come here, and then work out a sign-and-trade with Toronto where we give them Crawford and either 1) Josh or 2) any two of Zaza/Bibby/Marvin (to get us within the cap) and a first round pick (so they don’t feel like they’re walking away emptyhanded) to make the deal work under the CBA. We then fill out the roster with solid veterans excited about the prospect of playing alongside two healthy All-Stars. That’s a recipe for a contender.

On the other hand, imagine if the Hawks win 50 games this year, and then the Hawks don’t re-sign JJ. JJ then signs with the Nets or Knicks for 5/$90M. Remember, the Hawks won’t have the cap space to sign any big-name free agent outright, which means we have to do a sign-and-trade. That means we have to give up some combination of the players I listed above. Given that prospect, why would a marquee free agent want to come here, knowing that he will be coming to a team recently depleted of its best player and 3 of its 4-5 next best players?

Is it likely that we can land any of those three guys? No. But it should be clear that it is much more likely to happen if we bring JJ back than if we let him walk.

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
8:09 pm

Lol…Ariose’s playlist:

Salim
Flip
Patrick Mills
Gerald Green ($800k!!!!!!!)
Rudy Gay
…and counting…

niremetal

October 1st, 2009
8:17 pm

Got my salaries messed up there. Assuming that the max salary next year is ~$16.5M, we would have to give up either Josh or Crawford and any one of Zaza/Bibby/Marvin to make the salaries match…I think. I know there are always hidden kinks in player’s contracts that can make them hard to trade, and there are even more variables with a sign-and-trade (not to mention that the CBA could get renegotiated between now and then, in which case everything I just said might become obsolete). But the general points hold about 1) having to deplete our roster to bring in a star and 2) a star being more likely to want to come to a team with JJ than he is to come to a team without him…

jerrywest

October 1st, 2009
8:26 pm

Toronto has no defense. They’ll suck so badly that they’ll be forced to trade Bosh by mid-season.

Welcome back Bosh.

icecold

October 1st, 2009
8:44 pm

i hope joe realize if he stick wit this team and can actually win a champion on this team at anytime of his career.. he will go to the hall of fame.. but if he go to a team thats already a contender, he will get a ring. but they probally will say they could of won it with out him. or somethin like that.. this has been his team.. his team to grow with. he bacame a all star on this team. not on another team. he is a elite player because he took a team and put it on his back and literally carried them in the worst situations, ( 20 points in the 4th quarter against boston in the playoffs, game winning shots, takin over games when nobody else will step up ) now the roster this year is almost garenteeing him that he will always have the peices he need to win a championship!!! and the young players aint gon do nothin but get better!! they still got a young talented.. imagin when everybody in there prime with hoe johnson runnin the show.. the championships can come back to back to back.. the chemistry and the skill will be there.. aint nothin stoppin them!! as long as they stay together!! just somethin to think about!!!!

icecold

October 1st, 2009
8:46 pm

Ariose

rudy gay would start over marvin williams!!! i would

Hoosier

October 1st, 2009
9:12 pm

Ariose, that is a very interesting out-of-the-box take from Hoopinion. I for one agree with them, maybe Sund does to. Maybe he made this offer to JJ knowing his EGO would be too big to accept it, and it would also get the fans off their backs……could get interesting.

KevinA

October 1st, 2009
9:46 pm

niremetal,

Josh and Marvin have reached the point in their careers that they have the potential to become like JJ, a fringe all star player. If they get close to 1,000 shot attempts not only will you see a better team balance but easier attempts for JJ. We don’t need to look for another star at this point, we need to feed the ball to the budding talent in our own house.

KevinA

October 1st, 2009
9:47 pm

3.06: Mike Bibby was eighth in the league in assist to turnover ratio. He needs to keep up the pace. John Hollinger rather insightfully points out in his Hawks preview (insider only) that Atlanta was one of the few teams (ever) to have a low turnover rate and high free throws attempted (FTA/TO). I did not even know this was a stat, but apparently, it is, and apparently, it is important. The Hawks were the only team in the league in the top five in FTA and bottom ten in TOs. Basically, the team got to the line without turning it over a lot. Those two things are normally mutually exclusive. I really don’t know how the team did this. I feel Joe, Josh, and Zaza turnover the ball all the time, but that is apparently just a feeling and not a fact. Regardless, the reality for this season is the Hawks need to keep it up, and that starts with Mike Bibby again in the top ten of assist to turnover. And if Woodson wants to give Horford and Josh more shots around the basket to increase that free throw attempt rate, fine by me.
http://www.peachtreehoops.com/

This is a fascinating stat that I had not heard before but explains and shows our unique strength.
Josh and Marvin drive the ball on a regular basis and if both improve the handle just a little bit more will be extremely difficult to stop. The amount of fouls the Hawks shoot is one of the strengths of our team. With even more aggression the Hawks can and I believe will get even better.

Melvin

October 1st, 2009
9:54 pm

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
10:28 pm

John Hollinger is a sharp guy, but I tire of his Hawks diatribes. Here’s my reply to Mark Bradley. Aw, nevermind, it was too lengthy to cut and paste. If you care at all to hear me rant against Hollinger like the homer that I am, just go to Bradley’s blog. If not, avoid it like the plague. :)

Big Ray

October 1st, 2009
10:29 pm

KevinA ,

Nice link. That is an interesting stat that bears some consideration.

KevinA

October 1st, 2009
10:34 pm

If Teague plays well and Crawford plays well and if Bibby plays well Just how much will JJ get to play? Spurs do this to save vets for the end of the year. Is it time to slow Joe for the end?

KevinA

October 1st, 2009
10:39 pm

Ray when are you starting your blog.

BaghdadHawk

October 2nd, 2009
7:58 am

The Hawks made the right decision to offer, and Joe made the right decision to decline. Bot the Hawks and Joe Johnson will be better for it. Joe, true Hawks fan believe in you and know that our team will go as far as you take us. My bigger concern is that Coach Woodson can play us at 10 deep every night. We can talk money later. Good luck this season Joe Johnson. Go Hawks!!

BaghdadHawk

October 2nd, 2009
8:02 am

I don’t understand all the hate on Joe? Be honest, who available is better? Lebron and Wade won’t be. No one is better fit or a better player than Joe. I hope he resigns.

dmortone

October 2nd, 2009
9:53 am

The fact that Marvin led the league in FTA/TO last year and then spent the offseason working on his ball-handling excites me more than anything else about this upcoming season. Marvin’s physical talents lends him to being a foul magnet aka…dare i say it…a potential number 1 option? That Charlette game when JJ was out is probably my favorite regular season game of last year.

fudd21

October 2nd, 2009
10:01 am

Nire,
I agree with your post regarding having two all-star caliber players or at least two bona fide players that are “go-to” guys and can get 20 on any given night. That’s why I am so excited about the addition of Crawford. Do I think he will average 20, No but he has the ability and he is respected for his scoring prowess around the league. That will take some of the doubles off JJ. I don’t know how much they will play together, but with the game on the line in the 4th quarter I do expect to see JJ and JC on the floor together.

As for Josh, Al or Marvin stepping up to be that 2nd player I would love to see it happening but I honestly don’t think it will. Some of you talk about the touches they get, but there is a reason they don’t get more touches. Woody offense basically consists of a lot of clear outs and players going one-on-one. Al isn’t best suited for that type of offense. How many times have we seen the ball go into the post to Al, he try and make a move only to kick the ball back out. The re-entry pass goes back into Al, he tries another move only to throw up an awkward, off balance shot. No, I’ll pass on him getting more touches in the post. Now if he’s getting the ball on the elbow for the 15 fotter that’s a different story as he can hit that effectively and most centers can’t/won’t come out and guard him there.

Josh said during the summer that he had no business hanging out around the 3 point line shooting 3’s. Whether that was by design or his own actions could be debated but we all will see what happens during the season. For him to become that go-to 20 ppg guy he would have to develop some type of consistent mid-range shot. I’m just not convinced that will happen. I think his shot would have to be totally revamped to ever become consistent.

Marvin I personally think he has the skill set but lacks the agression. I would like to see him develop the ability to back smaller people down. It frustrates me to watch guys that are 3 inches shorter and 20 lbs lighter guard Marvin in the post for him to kick the ball back out. He should attend JJ class on how to back smaller people down.

Kevin A,
I read that article too. Did you see the part where Hollinger said Marvin actually lead the league in that category. WOW! Marvin lead the league in a category that’s positive. Somewhere Rod just threw up in his mouth. LOL

Stating the Obvious

October 2nd, 2009
10:10 am

Marvin COULD be that second 20ppg with his eyes shut guy that we need if Woody had him do more than stand in the corner waiting for a last-second pass in case IS O Joe breaks down. I remember that Charlotte game too, and the other one right before it against Minnesota where Woody made him JJ for two days and he scored 25 points or something like that. Then JJ came back and he got sent back to his hideout in the corner.

The Hawks already have a second offensive weapon, Woody just doesn’t use him unless his first offensive weapon is out.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
10:19 am

fudd21- Your take on Marvin “he has the skill set but lacks the aggression” is 100% right on the money.
I have been saying for awhile that of Josh/Marvin/Al the most likely to make that next step towards All Star calibre is Marvin.
As a Hawks fan, I hope they all do.
But, Marvin has to play with an aggressiveness that can be lacking at times. I wonder how much injuries last year played a part in his up and down season (I am going with a lot). For stretches he played like an up and coming all star. Now we just need to see it for a season.

I really hope his back is OK and doesn’t turn into a chronic problem. If it does the Hawks will be set back worse than if Joe leaves.

Sautee

October 2nd, 2009
10:31 am

Daniel,

I was gone all day yesterday, but thanks for having my back regarding the “selfish JJ post”

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
10:47 am

Dear lord…were there really just 4 straight posts that were strongly positive about Marvin??? Has someone checked the temperature in hell recently?

And Sautee, I think you know this already, but I was responding more to Daniel’s assertion that no one was calling JJ selfish than I was attacking your post. You got my email on that anyway :)

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
11:11 am

Sautee- No problem dude, and Nire- we know what you meant, your always cool. Sautee did you see the heat that I took for saying something about Truth-Serum. Good grief that guy needs meds.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
11:15 am

Throwing something out there to generate a conversation, maybe.

We keep getting great reviews on Crawford, love it. But, we have heard from Knicks and GS fans that Crawford is a great guy, always says the right things and comes into camp great but then the season start and well….. you have seen the critisism.
What are we to believe? (I know we really won’t find out until the season) Is this a new Jamal in a winning situation who will be awesome or are we being sold a bill of goods?

Big Ray

October 2nd, 2009
11:51 am

KevinA ,

Actually, we started the fan blog back up around a week ago. It’s called “Hawks Fan Nest” now, not Hawks Hacks. Come on by, was wondering where you were. :)

Daniel ,

The fact that Crawford has yet to play one game in a Hawks uniform can’t be ignored. At the same time, we have to consider how fans of a team react when a player leaves their team. Look what some people said about Childress when he left. Yes, those were different circumstances, but the application is there, I think. Also, Golden State and New York are two highly disfunctional ballclubs (New York far less so, now with D’Antoni in town). I’d hesitate to be too critical of a lot of guys who have recently played there. I mean, even Baron Davis wanted out of Nellie’s madhouse. And has ANYBODY been upset that they got traded away from New York before D’Antoni arrived? Knicks fans are gonna say whatever, because their team stunk up the joint like crazy, despite a lot of money spent, and some serious talent being there.

Golden State fans should be complaining 50 times as much as some of us do about Woody. Maybe even 100 times as much. That is a LOSER team that lost one of it’s best players ever, due to a crazy coach who controls way too much within the organization, and will turn on his players at any given moment.

Seriously, Woody has his flaws, but he’s straight up. If he likes you, that doesn’t change. If he doesn’t, you know it from the start. But he doesn’t say “hey, you’re the man”, then next week “pack your bags, I don’t ever wanna see you again.” Woody’s never been two-faced like that. He’s straight up. Nellie? If Truth Serum ever wants to do another “Forked Tongue Review”, Nellie should be his subject…..

Let’s not also forget what Sacramento fans had to say about Bibby when he got traded here. They were down on him, too. And you know what? They were right about some things. Dude has flaws to his game (some were always there, some have developed as his game has declined to a degree), but FIT is what’s important. And I think we’d only be lying to ourselves if we didn’t acknowledge that he has fit us well and the Hawks have been a better team for it, regardless of what his former team’s fans had to say about it.

With that in mind, I expect positive results from Crawford. It’s not impossible for him to cause chemistry issue, but I think it’s improbable.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
12:06 pm

Nice post Ray- that is the direction I am leaning too. Isn’t awesome to think that the Hawks are now an orginization where we expect players to play better because we are already a high functioning team!!! This is new territory for us.

Truth-Serum

October 2nd, 2009
1:12 pm

Big Ray

October 2nd, 2009
11:51 am

Im On it!

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
1:27 pm

Truth-serum: I am trying to help you here, but you do realize that Ray was mocking you right?

Stating the Obvious

October 2nd, 2009
1:39 pm

No, truth-serum doesn’t get when he’s been mocked, just like Sam/Rod:
http://blogs.ajc.com/hawks/2009/08/05/extension-talks-for-joe/comment-page-5/#comments

Stating the Obvious

August 9th, 2009
8:16 pm

You’re not fooling anyone but yourself if you think anyone is buying into “Sam” and “Rod” being separate people. But we’ll know what’s up if “Ben from East Point” suddenly shows up making diss posts on Marvin.

Tom from Bankhead

August 9th, 2009
8:27 pm

Marvin sucks.

Sam from the Swats

August 9th, 2009
8:32 pm

Thanks Tom

They both are also convinced that anyone who disagrees with them are the same person. Schizo and stupid, a great combination!

Stating the Obvious

October 2nd, 2009
1:40 pm

Oh, I meant to say that they both are convinced that anyone who disagrees with them are both the same person AND A RACIST/UNCLE TOM. Gotta love it.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
1:44 pm

STO- your previous comment on Marvin, I agree with for the most part. I don’t think that Marvin backsliding had anything to do with Woody. I think it had more to do with injury and Marvin’s own deferance to JJ. I think he needs to step up and insert himself into the game more.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
1:45 pm

Also, to be fair Rod has been a lot more middle of the road on Marvin lately.

kirkinga

October 2nd, 2009
2:00 pm

In reading the responses to this provocative blog, there seems to be an underlying assumption that the economy is going to be robust by this time next year.Everyone is salivating at the big names available and then we have the second-level players also wanting to get in on the action generated by those big names.

Trouble is, every economic forecast that I have read expects the economy to still be slow, though improving. Tickets sales may not be robust this season because consumers are holding on to their money and there is a great deal of unemployed who aren’t likely to take in many games or buy much merchandise.

Sure there are a few owners that will be able to absorb a huge contract or two, New York for example, but if he goes to New York, that kind of defeats the “he wants a ring” idea that some are pushing.

I believe what will happen is that teams will not be as aggressive as people are predicting and that almost all the big names will stay with their current teams and sign for big money. Then we will see the same thing that happened in baseball with the next level of players finding willing suitors but at discounted prices some will be smart enough to quickly take deals (Bibby) others will have to go through some ego adjustment before finally landing a contract (Iverson).

In the end it is mostly about the economy which makes JJ’s refusal to sign a risk right now. We will not know if it is a mistake until the offseason. If he ends up signing a deal for less than he was offered this Summer, then it was a mistake. I think he will come to understand market forces the same way Smith, Marvin, and Bibby eventually came to understand them and stay with the Hawks (assuming they don’t pull a surprise).

Stating the Obvious

October 2nd, 2009
2:02 pm

Daniel,

Maybe. But how does Marvin assert himself more if no plays are run for him? Is he supposed to scream at Bibby and JJ to pass him the ball? You know that ain’t how it works in the big leagues.

big tone

October 2nd, 2009
2:33 pm

joe johnson is called selfish because the other atlanta hawks free agents took less money to be part of a winning competitive team.what good is a star with no supporting cast.personally i wouldnt re-sign him.he has no heart.it showed in the playoffd earlier this year,definitely overrated.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
2:34 pm

STO- I hear you, but you can be aggressive in positioning yourself for the pass. Delivering when called upon. Going inside and drawing fouls(he needs to do that more). I really think that we were seeing that transformation for the first half of the season last year, but injuries really set him back, and his team did not involve him as much when he came back.

Stating the Obvious

October 2nd, 2009
2:56 pm

Daniel,

I get you, but thats dodging the question. How was he supposed to be aggressive in positioning himself for the pass when the plays called for him to stand in the corner while JJ or Flip went one-on-one? In half-court offenses, players don’t decide where to position themselves. They go where the play calls for them to go.

He did go inside and draw fouls plenty when he got the ball, as the 18-20 at the line game against Charloote showed. But that doesn’t answer the question I had, which is how is he supposed to get the ball more if the offense calls for all the plays to be run through JJ or Flip (or now Crawford) with him standing in the corner, Bibby and Josh on the wings, and Horford on the block? It’s no coincidence that he and Horford get the fewest touches, they’re always the furthest from the ball. Is Horford not aggressive enough either?

The Truth

October 2nd, 2009
2:59 pm


At least we know what Wade reasons are for not signing his extension. Riley has a plan.

“Wade’s persistent comments about how he is waiting to see the Heat get closer to championship contention before signing a contract extension have set off alarms everywhere but Riley’s office.”

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
3:07 pm

That is assuming that they are running a called play, which does not happen as much as people think. Now, can Woodson make a more concerted effort to have the team focus on Marvin? Sure. I think we were seeing that some before the injuries. But, we also saw tenative play by Marvin, as well. The difference between him and Horford, is that Marvin usually has a size advantage on his defender, which would behoove him to get inside more. Al has to use quickness and a 10 footer to be effective. I think Al is doing just fine. I am saying all this about Marvin not because I am dogging him, just the opposite. I think his game can(and needs) to rise up (even more than Josh and Al) because I think he can be the key to this team being a good 4th seed type team to a team making that next step that everyone is talking about.
Some of it is coaching, but some of it is Marvin too. We seem to disagree on which part is the bigger part, but we agree on the outcomes.
This is another area where we will see when the season starts.

BosnianBaller

October 2nd, 2009
3:14 pm

I laughed pretty hard when Hollinger said Vince Carter is a better player than Turlkoglu in his chat from the other day.Carter is the biggest ball hog and has done nothing in the playoffs in his careeer.Turkoglu is a complete player.Carter is a better shooter and thats it.I wouldn’t be surprised if the Hawks win the division this year,

Mike N.

October 2nd, 2009
3:17 pm

I like the positive Marvin talk….he does need to step up. But also, Woody needs to make sure that Josh stays in the paint. Last season when we would swing the ball it would always end up in Josh’s hands for a long jumper. That needs to be Marvins shot.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
3:18 pm

truth- cool link. I agree that D.Wade is a superstar, but I have to be honest last year in the playoffs his whiny behavior really turned me off. He comes across as a real punk sometimes. I don’t know if I was being influenced, because I always liked him before that series.

Stating the Obvious

October 2nd, 2009
3:24 pm

Daniel, I don’t think that there’s a team in the league that doesn’t have a default offense, in other words an offensive setup that you go into by default unless a different play is called. You think it’s purely by coincidence that the Jazz run the pick and roll on two thirds of their offensive plays, or that the Lakers run the triangle about the same amount of the time, or that Eddie Jordan’s teams fall back into the Princeton…or that the Hawks usually fall into ISO Joe/Flip? Not trying to be funny, but what exactly do you think Woody and Crawford and the rest of the team is referring to when they talk about the new guys “learning the system?” When plays other than that are called, it always seems to be Bibby that calls them, not Woody.

I agree that Marvin could be more aggressive. But there’s only so much you can do in the NBA if your coach runs an offense that by defalt calls for you to be standing 20 feet away from the ball? When JJ went out and “ISO Joe with Marvin in the corner” became “ISO Marvin with Mo in the corner” for a couple games, Marvin took a lot more shots. I don’t see how you can assign a bigger part of it to anyone but the coach, who dictates the offensive “system” the team plays in.

The Truth

October 2nd, 2009
3:40 pm

Daniel

True, I had those feelings of him as well. But as Yoda would put it:
“a competitor, he is”

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
3:40 pm

Man, the pace is picking up here.

<—— Loves it!

Dezz nuttz

October 2nd, 2009
3:44 pm

What… Does Truth Serum have star status? What about Dezz Nuttz?

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
3:48 pm

I hear you STO: I think we will have to agree to disagree on this one. Hopefully, we will see some changes this season either from the play calling, Marvin himself or both. Hopefully both.

Smell My Feet.

October 2nd, 2009
3:53 pm

That guy truth serum must be pretty slow and innocent. How stupid was he to be nice to some one who was being malicious to him. What a dunce! You guys win the SMELL MY FEET AWARD OF THE DAYS! What a crew! You fooled truth serum. That ought to get you some ata boy’s at the next Bubba Crew clavern meeting.

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
3:54 pm

Bosnian- I am with you that Turk is better than VC, but I am not sure the Hawks win the division (I hope they do). I think the pick up Brandon Bass is a realy nice addition to that team. Honestly, I think it was the best free agent signing in the East (including Rasheed).

Daniel

October 2nd, 2009
3:56 pm

Smell my feet/truth serum- Nobody tried to fool you. I think it was meant to be very obvious. Maybe you can cuss and insult people here for a little while so you can feel better before the weekend.

Smell My Feet.

October 2nd, 2009
4:07 pm

Im sorry if your feeling have been hurt Daniel. I hope you feel better. Yea, I noticed the sarcasm from Ray. I always notice the sarcasm from you and Sautee and non mental and ken… from the whole hate cell that you guys run here. I appreciate you. I understand you. Thats why I have no problem showing you my NUTTZ, which you clearly enjoy.

Blast

October 2nd, 2009
4:10 pm

I actually saw this coming early on in the pre-season when Sund was trying to sign Joe to an extension. I blogged that JJ might not want to sign one with the Hawks, that he might prefer to play out his last year, test free agency and see what his value is. That has now happened. I just don’t understand why anyone would want to hate the man for that, though.

I kind of like the move by Joe because what he has done is put himself under a microscope. I simply mean that if Joe wants to get that last big contract with the Hawks or any other team in 2010, then he has to play like he is the MAN to make the MAN’s money. We can all agree that Joe had a sub par playoff last season. So to make that big payday next year, JJ has to play at an elite level, the kind of level we have not seen since 2005 when he averaged 25 points per game, with multiple games when he scored 30 points or more. I think his decision not to sign can only be good for him and Hawks alike.

We should all remember. Wade declined to sign an extension with the Heat. So did LeBron, Bosh and Amare. Can anyone tell me if those players are been crucified by their fans the way folks here have been calling out JJ?

Samuel

October 2nd, 2009
4:12 pm

Is Turk a Hall of Famer?

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
4:21 pm

No. But my guess is that he’s better in SVG’s offense than Vince will be.

The Flash

October 2nd, 2009
4:41 pm

Niremetal, you make some good points about the comparisons, but on examination, not so much. First and foremost, you forgot for a second about COSTS AND GAINS.

First, JJ costs tons more in salary than Roy, tons, and, if he is to stay, none of us can count that high. Roy is still under his rookie contract and his next one won’t be a fraction of JJ’s.

Second, management took JJ and thought that he was the ANSWER at the point. Thus, they selected MW instead of Paul or Williams. We are talking huge here, sports fans, huge. A backcourt of one of those and Roy for the future, at the low dollars that would cost.

The discussion could really end here, as I take it you would agree since you blew off these points previously, didn’t even mention them.

However, let me say that I think I have a feel for these things and JJ plays the game, his style, is catching and looking and then deciding what is best. That is the way he sees the game. There is a reason that Phoenix was willing to let him go. I do not think that he can change his style anymore than Arenas can.

Now, Roy might hold it, I haven’t seen him enough to tell, but I have seen him enough to KNOW that he has a choice. He can let it go quickly, he understands the passing game and is completely comfortable with it, and has a sense of when the advantage is there or will lkely be in a moment, and when to just keep it moving.

You can’t put the ball in a player’s hands as much as it’s in a top scorer’s if that soorer only sees the court like he has to make something happen. I don’t care if his name is JJ or LeBron. It ruins the game for the rest of the team, no matter how many games can be won.

We will see if ShaQ can lead LeBron away from that type of style, or if LeBron persists with it and never in my view will come close to the truly greats, and among them I include Kobe last year, but not in years past except when he played with Shaq and even then not so much.

I know that this is near sacralege but I always was bored watching Oscar play for exactly the reasons I’m articulating here. People can talk about triple doubles all they want; to me, the game is about five players moving the ball and themselves to create advantage. Sure great shooters and scorers will take more of the shots but not at the expense of the flow, rather as a consequence of it while at the same time being its generator.

Me, I would not pay JJ the dollars he undoubtedly will want unless he shows that he can play that style of ball, which I think is what championship teams demand of their stars. It was that way back in the day, and I think it so today. It’s time for JJ to step up.

bigdave

October 2nd, 2009
4:53 pm

Flash… Roy just got a nice check this summer…

thehawksleftthenest

October 2nd, 2009
5:01 pm

BosnianBaller you call vince carter a ball hog so what does that make crawford??? A ball hog we bash carter because he has never been in a winning team but we turn the other way and not say the same about crawford i hate that we got him he score 20 points but shot stupid shots and does not pass the ball what so ever and i’ve watched a lot of magic basketball games hedo is a complete player but he is no super star or all star he is a really good player and i might call him a system player he can put a team on his back for 2 or 3 games but can also loose focus and jack up contested shots, he is no hall of famer but he is a good all around player but i cannot say he is better than vince no way….

Ramon

October 2nd, 2009
6:03 pm

Vince has been on a winning team. He’s lead his team to the play offs at least 4-6 times.

BosnianBaller

October 2nd, 2009
6:05 pm

thehawksleftthenest I think the difference between carter and crawford is that crawford is not the main player.Carter has never lived up to his hype of being the number one guy.Crawford has always played on crappy teams he hasn’t been to the playoffs at all.Carter has had Jefferson and Kidd and didn’t really stand out at all.I’m not saying that he should of won the title with those nets teams,but I can’t remember one good playoff game he has been in.I think Crawford will pass more b/c he is in a situation where the Hawks are winning so he will pass more as he said he would.

I would take Turkouglu in a heartbeat over Carter.Turkoglu is team first.He is no superstar neither is carter.Turkoglu is 6′10 and pretty much played point guard in the playoffs not to mention he scores close to 20 points per game.Carter is better than Turkoglu in scoring and maybe on D,but overall Turkoglu is better.I want to know why you think Carter is better?Based on what?Orlando will not be the same team they were last year b/c Hedo left.

BosnianBaller

October 2nd, 2009
6:08 pm

Ramon Carter was really good in Toronto thats why he was in the playoffs 4-6 times.He’s not the same player as he once used to be.His legs are pretty much gone

Ramon

October 2nd, 2009
6:08 pm

Also Vince’s career stat averages in the playoffs are 25 ppg, 7 rbg, 5 asg, and 1.5 steals. Those numbers are even better than JJs.

Ramon

October 2nd, 2009
6:11 pm

Bosnian, last season Carter averaged 20 ppg, 5 rpg, and 5 asg. That was while playing 36 min a game for 80 games. I’m sorry, show me how that equals his legs been gone. Is that not the same (actually better) production that JJ gave last season?

truly1

October 2nd, 2009
6:18 pm

big tone i do agree with you that jj is selfish in the fact that other players took less money to stay with a winning team. Rick sund did everything within reason to make this team better including resigning bibby which is joe js boy. so then you jj get offered an extention to stay with teammates who want to stay with you. Now you want to test free agency it is not right. i dont think 4 60 mill is not a bad contract it is a raise. Bibby signed a 3 year deal to stay with you joe and now you want to test the waters. Sounds like a man and woman relationship but he is selfish and some of us might do the same thing nevertheless

BosnianBaller

October 2nd, 2009
6:23 pm

Ramon-Who on the Nets can score besides Carter? Harris and thats it.Carter has to do that for his team to have a chance at winning.JJ had 21.4 ppg 5.8 asg 4.4rpg thats not way off.Carter has been in the league 11 years made the playoffs 5 times why is this? Basketball is not like Baseball where you can add somebody and they produce b/c everyone gets to hit.Basketball is about chemistry and Carter isn’t a team player.

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
6:27 pm

Flash,

1) We draft CP3 or Deron, then we don’t get to draft Roy.
2) Roy is about to get a pretty massive contract starting next summer. So the cost of him vs. JJ will be pretty close…Roy will be getting.

In any case, I wasn’t advocating their relative costs, the wisdom of drafts past, or anything like that. All I was doing was comparing JJ and Roy on the court. And on that front, we all know JJ isn’t your cup of tea anyway, but I’ll respond quickly to a couple things.

First, you obviously didn’t watch JJ in Phoenix much if you think he played the way you describe back then. Sorry, but he didn’t. He was a true scion of D’Antoni’s offense who moved the ball VERY well in Phoenix. And he actually did play a decent amount of PG there – about 6-8 minutes per game even when Nash was at 100% – and very frequently got the ball early in the clock. D’Antoni wanted JJ back. The reason he was let go wasn’t because he held onto the ball too long, it was because Phoenix already had $45M/yr wrapped up in just 3 players, and JJ would have made it $60M just for 4. At that price, they could fill out their roster with minimum salary players and STILL have been in the luxury tax. They couldn’t afford to keep JJ and have a bench worth more than 2 cents so they wisely let him go (and somehow managed to dupe Billy Knight into thinking that there was a chance in hell they’d re-sign him at more than $9M per year, but that’s a story for another day…).

Anyway, comparing JJ to Roy as far as “who holds the ball more” is just for kicks and giggles anyway because they’re playing in such different systems, as I already said. We can’t say how JJ would look in McMillan’s ball movement oriented system (although as I said, we do know how JJ did in an even more ball movement oriented in Phoenix) or how Roy would do in an ISO offense like Woody’s.

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
6:30 pm

*Roy will be getting 5yr/$82M.

truly1

October 2nd, 2009
6:33 pm

yeah roy is younger then joe

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
6:50 pm

And before anyone blows my post way out of proportion again. if I were Rick Sund, and Kevin Pritchard called me up tomorrow and said “hey, I’ve found a loophole in the CBA that allows us to trade you Brandon Roy for JJ straight up. Wanna make the deal?” . . . well, I’d say “yes” before the upswing of his bipolar disorder ends and he starts to think that every one of his players is a future Hall of Famer again. Because I think Roy and JJ are about even now, and Roy is 3 years younger and cheaper. So please respond to everything I said with those thoughts in mind, and don’t attack straw men…

Sautee

October 2nd, 2009
7:51 pm

kirknga,

Excellent point about the economy.

Big Mouth

October 2nd, 2009
9:11 pm

I think for the Hawks to get over the hump there are three things they need to do within the first 2 months of the season.

1) Get Woodson a contract extention.
2) Get JJ under a new contract.
3) Up grade the Center post by trading Al Horford and Z. Paschulia for Bynum or Shaq

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
9:13 pm

Big Mouth

October 2nd, 2009
9:19 pm

Its hard to understand how the Hawks can go any further without the getting woodson under contract. There arent that many quality coaches available and I hate to see woodson coach somewhere else. As for JJ, there are only a hand full of superstars out there and JJ can break teams down. Sign the man.

Big Mouth

October 2nd, 2009
9:21 pm

Does any body know whats up with flip? Is he going to sign?

Joe Mama

October 2nd, 2009
9:27 pm

Hey Matt, I mean Non metal. Do you have a live or do you spend all your time as secretary for the bubba hate association?

Joe Mama

October 2nd, 2009
9:28 pm

Joe Mama

October 2nd, 2009
9:33 pm

jerrywest

October 2nd, 2009
9:38 pm

Woodson said, “We haven’t had a young point guard like Teague since I’ve been here, a kid that possess all the different kinds of skills that he does”.

Any doubt Woody hates Acie?

thehawksleftthenest

October 2nd, 2009
9:57 pm

BosnianBaller let me correct you on some points hedo did not average 20 points in the playoffs he averaged 15.8 other than the game winning shot vs. phillie he did not do anything in that series and why is it that every team crawford has been on he gets traded right away you cannot tell me he is a good teammate and you clearly only watched the ecf and the finals not the whole orlando magic season because if you did you would not that hedo is not that big of a playmaker when jameer is playing points he gets most of his points because of teams doubling howard, i love how you act like he runs the orlando magic offense which he really dint do except when jameer was not in the game or when howard was in foul trouble i live in florida and i watch magic games although im a hawks fan hedo he is a system player and in orlando he fit the role perfectly and vince has old legs doe that means that joe smith, jason collins, mike bibby all are worthless cause there just as old as carter???

thehawksleftthenest

October 2nd, 2009
10:08 pm

i totally agree with ramon and if you want me to take it a step further BosnianBaller id you take the aveages that hedo has averaged with the magic the last 2 years out he old averages about 13 to 14 points a game
and we critize carter but carter has been to the playoffs more than jj and you make no sense you say that vince has no help in new jersey (so that means he is the primary offensive option) but you call him a ball hog and carter almost averaged the same amount of assist last year than hedo now imagine that number with the magic which have plenty of weapons… and we criticize vince for not winning a championship with the good new jersey teams then we should also criticize kidd
all in all i believe vince is a much better player than hedo although i will say that hedo is a better defender….

thehawksleftthenest

October 2nd, 2009
10:15 pm

one last thing i forgot to mention in reality if you watch the magic games rashard lewis is the real match up nightmare beucase he is to quick for power foward and he spreads the floor i would argue that he is the real key to the magic success and wats up with all this fuss with hedo he averaged 15.8 pointsand 5.3 in the playoffs rashard lewis averaged 19 points and 6.4 reobunds and hit more key shots than hedo….

Samuel

October 2nd, 2009
10:49 pm

No jerry, he doesn’t hate Acie. Acie is a scrubb. He is the 3rd or 4th string PG right now in Golden State. He’s freekin behind Speedy for God’s sake. Go to Golden State’s web site. They broadcast every practice. He got hurt the first day of training camp.

Bosnian Baller,Vince Carter is a Hall of Famer. Turk has yet to make one AllStar appearance. I rest my case.

The Flash

October 2nd, 2009
11:01 pm

niremetal, very, very, very good post. I cannot say that I saw JJ play much at Phoenix, and don’t really remember what I did see. It was enough for me to know that he was not a point guard. I don’t even think that he is a 2. He should be playing a 3.

Without JJ, how do you figure they don’t get a shot at Roy? I’m not understanding that. You think that Paul or Williams would have made that much of a difference? I don’t know when Roy was selected.

There was no reason for JJ to catch, look for himself, look for himself again, before doing something with it the last two years. None. I have difficulty believing that that is what Woody wanted, or more particular Herb, who has the Pman’s ear at least. No, Woody is captive to how JJ plays, not the other way around, at least in my view.

I am no fan of Woody’s style and would have dumped him long ago. But, I think JJ’s style on the court is the one that he favors, the one that he invisions, the one that they sold him on, being da Man.

Didn’t know roy gets all that much money.

Few other words about the two players. Roy makes plays on defense, loose balls, long rebounds, and finishes at the rim. These are the things that separate him from JJ, who does none of them well, and does not move nearly as well with or without the ball in transition.

Ten teams have a selection, Roy goes first 10 times.

They don’t through all that money and all those players (Diaw and picks) at JJ, and take Paul or Williams, I believe that they get Roy and are now playing for Championships. BTW, as I said back then, the steal of free agency was Blake, whom I still can’t believe that they passed on the year that they chose Marvin.

No, the Hawks did not help themselves with the JJ deal. It was wrongheaded, set the team back seriously, and deprived the fans the opportunity to see exciting offensive play both in the half court and runouts that are way too infrequent even when this team is playing well.

Of course, in order to pass on JJ, there would have had to have been no BK doing Gearon’s bidding, and no Woody also, who at that time was BK’s guy. But, that, my friends, is a shole other story that nobody needs to relive.

Terrific work, niremetal, notwithstanding ever I just said, your analysis stands as a solid alternative perspective. Wow, this website is still getting it done, like no other I visit. Props, my brothers, great, great work.

BosnianBaller

October 2nd, 2009
11:06 pm

Samuel I am not saying career wise that hedo is better than carter.carter has had the best career between the 2.I’m not sure he is a hall of famer tho.Right now if I had to choose between the 2 i would pick hedo.

cp

October 2nd, 2009
11:12 pm

I’m loving what I’m reading about Teague and Hunter. I really hope Hunter makes this team. The Warriors were talking about trading Law about a week after they got him. I really wanted the kid to succeed but it looks like he is another good college player whose game didn’t translate as well in the pro’s. He has time to get it together but I don’t know if he has the attitude to get it done.

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
11:13 pm

Heh. Lots of things I could pick apart in that point, Flash, but I’ll let you get the last word ;)

thehawksleftthenest

October 2nd, 2009
11:19 pm

BosnianBaller i’ll ask you a question and please be truthful how many orlando magic games have you seen last season (not counting games that they played against tha hawks)

Samuel

October 2nd, 2009
11:38 pm

VC
* 8-time NBA All-Star selection: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 (did not play in 2002 due to injury)
* 2-time All-NBA:
o Second Team: 2001
o Third Team: 2000
* NBA Slam Dunk Champion: 2000
* NBA All-Rookie First Team: 1999
* NBA Rookie of the Year Award: 1999
* The Sporting News NBA Rookie of the Year: 1999[47]

If that’s not Hall of Fame. They should shut the place down.

Samuel

October 2nd, 2009
11:43 pm

VC Career highs:

* Points – 51 (2 times)
* Field Goals Made – 20 vs. Milwaukee 01/14/00
* Field Goals Attempted – 36 @ Philadelphia 01/21/01
* Three Point Field Goals Made – 9 vs. Memphis 12/11/06
* Three Point Field Goals Attempted – 20 vs. Memphis 12/11/06
* Free Throws Made – 23 @ Miami 12/23/05
* Free Throws Attempted – 27 @ Phoenix 12/30/00
* Offensive Rebounds – 8 vs. Chicago 11/05/05
* Defensive Rebounds – 13 (2 times)
* Total Rebounds – 16 vs. Washington 04/07/07
* Assists – 14 @ Milwaukee 01/09/09
* Steals – 6 (3 times)
* Blocks – 6 vs. Chicago 03/28/99
* Minutes Played – 63 vs. Sacramento 02/23/01[19]

Ball Hogs dont get 14 assists in one game. He doesn’t play defense yet he got 6 steals in one game 3 times and 6 blocks in one game. How bout Turk?

Samuel

October 2nd, 2009
11:50 pm

Hedo’s Awards

2001 NBA All-Rookie Second Team
2008 NBA Most Improved Player

WOW!!

niremetal

October 2nd, 2009
11:52 pm

Samuel,

Shaq is a future Hall of Famer too. Did that make him a good fit with the Suns?

Allen Iverson is a future Hall of Famer too. Did that make him a good fit with Detroit? Denver?

Ben Wallace is a future Hall of Famer too. Did that make him a good fit with Chicago?

Elton Brand was on pace to be a Hall of Famer before his injury two years ago. But even if he gets healthy, is he a good fit in Philly?

Mitch Richmond in Washington…

Marbury everywhere he played, even before he got hurt…

Let’s say the Lakers trade Kobe to Orlando right now for Dwight Howard, straight up. Does either team improve? Since the answer to that question is obvious, let me give you the natural follow-up:

Can’t you at least acknowledge that even if a player has serious, serious game, he might not be as good a fit as a slightly lesser-caliber player in the context of a particular team and system?

niremetal

October 3rd, 2009
12:02 am

(I don’t know why I bothered there….I fully expect Samuel’s response to be about as powerful as “You forgot Poland…”)

Samuel

October 3rd, 2009
12:07 am

Shaq made All NBA. The other guys sucked. Dumars is a head case. Ben Wallace was on steroids. If brand get’s healthy, Philly may pass the Hawks. Kobe, VC, Lewis, Bass, Nelson would probably beat the Lakers(minus Kobe) with Dwight. Mitch Richmond was overrated and Starbury is laughing all the way to the bank. “immo do me”.LOL!!

Yes, he “might” not but the season hasn’t even started yet and clueless bloggers and writers are saying VC won’t fit. “How the Hell do you know?”.

Samuel

October 3rd, 2009
12:21 am

I’m out. I got a Futbol game tomorrow.

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
12:57 am

Heh, heh, heh!

Classic battle between Samuel and Niremetal . Nire makes some good points, and Sam does too, especially with his last question. The answer? We don’t know. None of us. But I’m sure somebody will claim that they do anyhow…. :)

The Flash ,

Wow, man. Nice post on JJ and “what could have been.” All I can say is that is definitely yet another strong opinion, no less supported than any others, and I think even the STAUNCHEST defenders of JJ, Billy, the JJ deal, etc, know better than to pick that hill to die on, as the saying goes.

I know you, Flash. If somebody actually had the cajones to come back and try to pick that argument apart, you would come back with three times the heat, and four times the solid backup. Hell, I can’t blame anybody for tenderly stepping away from that one. ;)

BosnianBaller

October 3rd, 2009
1:02 am

thehawksleftthenest – all the games in the playoffs and about 10 regular season games not including the hawks games.If you live in Orlando do you really think for this upcoming season that there will be enough of the ball to go around to everyone(Howard,Lewis,Carter,Nelson,Pietrus) I think Carter’s numbers will go down b/c of this by how much I don’t know.Plus what is the Magic Starting line up this year(If you know please share)? Will Carter be a 3 or 2? When they had Hedo they were all huge on the front court and caused a lot of mismatches(yes lewis was a big part of that as well).

We will see how it works out in the season.Can’t wait

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
1:07 am

If there’s a noticeable change in the way Teague is being treated, compared to past rookies, there’s good reason for it, Woodson said.

“I think his teammates see it like we see it as coaches,” Woodson said. “We haven’t had a young point guard like Teague since I’ve been here, a kid that possess all the different kinds of skills that he does. He can’t be anything but a positive to your ball club, so you’ve got to help him because he can help us.”

Still, Woodson said he will challenge Teague to assert himself more and to command the floor when he’s out there, regardless of what other players are with him.

“I do think that it’s good for him that there are veterans in front of him,” Woodson said. “But I don’t want him to feel by being a rookie that he’s not a part of what we’re doing. Because he has a chance, with the skills he possesses, to be a pretty good point guard in this league. That’s why I’m going to challenge him more and I’m going to demand his teammates do the same.

“Because sometimes rookies can get lost in the shuffle if you’re not tough enough. I don’t want this rookie to get lost in the shuffle, because he’s a natural point guard that is going to play this position in the league for a long time.”

Huh.

I tell you what. Woody always tells the truth. And here, he tells the truth about the past, as much as he is about the present. Read between the lines, people. It ain’t hard.

VERY beautifully written, Sekou .

Having said that, I can’t imagine a bigger endorsement for a rookie, coming from a head coach. I’m sure glad Woody likes Teague. If he didn’t, he’d be lost in the shuffle….

Now I wonder. Are the veteran players treating the rookie well because the head coach is, or are they doing so just out of the goodness of their hearts? I’m not being sarcastic, I’m being serious.

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
1:10 am

And DANIEL ,

Hey mister! I was messing with truth serum , but I wasn’t trying to be MEAN ! I thought it was a funny joke, and he seemed to take it really well (I was impressed). But NOOOOOOOOOOOO….YOUUUUUUUUUUU had to go and stir things up, didn’t ya? Ya scurvy knave, you! :twisted: :lol:

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
1:12 am

Great to have vets around who actually care about the younger players, and can actually teach them something.

I don’t miss Lorenzen Wright’s crack-monkey a$$ one bit. “Pulling rank” on Horford, pulling pranks on Acie (if that had been MY car, Lo Wright would STILL be on injured reserve), and what did he have to show for it on the court? The fool averaged more fouls than he did points or rebounds. Any idiot can do that….

BosnianBaller

October 3rd, 2009
1:33 am

niremetal -I agree with you on the Elton Brand thing.Last year everyone(so called tv analysts such as Tim Legler and others) said the 76ers would be one of the top 3 or 4 teams when they got Brand.It wasn’t until he got hurt that they started to play good basketball.

Ramon

October 3rd, 2009
1:57 am

Carter’s numbers will not go down. He is still the only player on the Magic who can create. He is still the number one clutch player they have. Bosnian, you say Carter only lead his team to the playoffs 5 times in 11 years. I guess you forget JJ has only been the best player on a play off team 2 times, and that is out of 8 years. So even if he does it the next three years, that will still be 5 out of 11 like your boy Carter. Also do you really feel the teams in Toronto were better than last years roster that surrounded JJ? T Mac wasn’t T Mac then.

Bosnian you also mentioned Vince being a ball hog and not a team player. Yet you fell to mention that Vince usually have the same amount of attempts as JJ for the last odd number of years. And is the biggest complaint around here not that JJ doesn’t get HIS teammates involved enough? Also Vince averages 25 ppg in the PLAYOFFS. JJ averages 18 since he’s been with the Hawks (when he was the 1st option). Not to mention Vince still has more explosiveness off one good leg than JJ has off both. And before you say JJ’s a better shooter, in ALL categories FG%, 3pt%, and FT% Vince has better percentages.So Vince is at LEAST as good as JJ (I think better), and you say he won’t fit in as good as Turk? Turk doesn’t have better handles, play making ability, defense, nor a better shooting touch than Vince (stats prove it).

Ramon

October 3rd, 2009
2:00 am

BosnianBaller

October 3rd, 2009
2:43 am

Vince Carter=Elton Brand
I’m not talking about JJ.Stats are nice to look at but it doesn’t say everything.Basketball is not Baseball where stats are everything.(98-99 Rockets had Olajuwon,Barkley,and Pippen where did they end up.Brand last year,A.I. in denver is a hall of famer and billups isn’t and what happend there. I’ll keep going if you want me to.Carter has had a much better career the hedo.Carter was the number 1 option in NJ last year and he will be 2 or 3 in Orlando thus dropping his stats(even tho stats are misused sometimes).Turk is a better play maker and has better handles.Carter does have a better shooting touch.I don’t think the Magic would of beaten the Cavs if Carter had taken Hedo’s place.They were simply to big.

There is no way anyone can win this debate.When the season gets underway we’ll see what happens.I guarantee you Carter’s stats will go down and Orlando will not go as far as last year unless Dwight Howard learns how to shoot a 15 ft.jumper .Anybody have any great stats about Howards jumper

Ramon

October 3rd, 2009
2:47 am

Bosnian, you do realize last season Hedo had more turnovers than Carter, even though Carter often faced double teams? And a better play maker to create his own shot than Carter? Ok……

BosnianBaller

October 3rd, 2009
2:58 am

Who was Orlando’s mvp in the playoffs and the go to guy in the last seconds.Yes Carter was Nj’s go to guy I know. Do you think Orlando makes it to the Finals last year w/out Hedo and Carter in his place.

Ramon

October 3rd, 2009
3:03 am

Actually, yes I do. Because Vince presence puts West in foul trouble all series long. Do you think Philly almost knocks off Orlando last year if Vince was there instead of Turk?

BosnianBaller

October 3rd, 2009
3:14 am

I don’t know maybe?They would beat Philly w/ carter but not Cleavland.
No way does Orlando go that far w/out Hedo and Vince in his place.NO WAY!

Now this year Howard is a year older and better.Bass and Anderson are there to give depth.They will be good,but hedo was the x-factor plain and simple.

Samuel

October 3rd, 2009
9:23 am

Hedo is right where he wants to be. Somewhere he can jack up shots and play no defense. Talk about fits. Let’s see if Toronto gets any better without Parker and Moon.

Joe Mama

October 3rd, 2009
9:47 am

Ray. I knew it was a shout out and a jib simultaneously. I feel you. No problem. You have a way of reaching out and holding your ground with class. Ill give you that.

Speaking of class, or rather the lack thereof:

mister sociological prophetess, just because a team does not win a championship does not mean that a key player wasn’t a good fit. Shaq was a good fit in Phoenix. His supporting cast was often injured and played on a c+ level.

Just because you have a good team doesn’t mean you have a great team or a championship team. Shaq will fit in fine because he’s a professional. At the end of the day it’s about getting the job done. Shaq can command double and triple team in the post. He can be a 1st or 2nd option. The rumors of his demise are greatly exaggerated. You won’t back him down and the alley oop is not happening with him in the post. Take your game outside please! Shaq will be play at the higher levels for the next three years. Too bad the Hawks did not show enough interest in him. We would surely be in the top thee. Between Paschulia and Horford Id prefer Shaq. Neither Zaza or Al or first second or third option material but rather they fit the “any is plenty” senario and everybody backs them down! With Zaza the expressway to the cup is open. Now we have to score two baskets. 1 to even the score they just got over Z and 2 to take the lead.

Joe Mama

October 3rd, 2009
9:50 am

(are a first)

Joe Mama

October 3rd, 2009
9:57 am

Its funny how when Acie turns to a lemon its Woody’s fault but now that hes a 4th or 5th point guard he’s a scubb… Credit Woodson with great vision for player talent!

Joe Mama

October 3rd, 2009
9:57 am

Melvin

October 3rd, 2009
10:49 am

Melvin

October 3rd, 2009
10:54 am

Asst coach Jim Todd said Woody has added a new offense this season. We will see…

http://www.nba.com/video/teams/hawks/2009/10/02/JimToddOct2.nba/

The Flash

October 3rd, 2009
11:18 am

Samuel, there are two words that explain why Ben Walace was let go by Detroit and did not succeed elsewhere and neither is roids. Can we say Larry Brown, boys and girls.

Larry integrated Walace into the offense, had the offense run through him often, and helped Walace learn to see the flow and develop two or three scoring options off the spots he was likely to make catches. Then, and here’s the real part that makes all the difference, he got the other guys, most importantly Rip and Chauncy, seeing Walace as a go-to option instead of just someone who was supposed to get the ball from them and do the heavy lifting on the other end. They needed to look for him, and look to see when he wanted it, which Walace learned to do under Larry.

That is why Detroit won under Larry and not under Flipper. Larry helped make each player smarter, helped them see and execute on the game’s team possibilities, and as a game coach, the work he had done with each individual and with the group allowed him to tweak things during the heat of playoff games, whisper in chauney’s ear and get a needed basket, maybe even from Ben, that wouldn’t have materialized otherwise.

Chauncey was fortunate to go to a team with a coach who is of the same cloth as Larry, although less the perfectionist and perhaps not nearly the same genius but still an amazing basketball mind and facilitator of other minds to grow. Walace wasn’t so fortunate.

Herb, my boys used to tell me eons ago, sees what Larry sees, but lacks the ability to bring others along in the way Larry can. Woody, it seems to me, has neither the vision nor the ability to help players improve their concepts as parts of an offensive.

Hey, Samual, this kid niremetal has got game, no?

jerrywest

October 3rd, 2009
12:40 pm

If we lose JJ and sign future hall of famer Iverson, I think Iverson will average more points than JJ. Is he a better fit than JJ? Carter may or may not do similar in Orlando.

niremetal

October 3rd, 2009
2:08 pm

Samuel would have had a valid point with his last question if only I had said that I knew anything about how Vince would fit in with Orlando. But that obviously isn’t the case, as even a brief glance at the last question from my next-to-last post would indicate.

Most commentators and most people around here (including Samuel) have been saying that the addition of Vince cemented Orlando in the top 3. The running assumption is that the Shaq and Carter trades have ensured that Orlando and Cleveland will stay ahead of Atlanta. All I’ve ever said – along with several other people around here – is that those moves are not a slam dunk.

It wouldn’t take me too long if I cared enough to look to find multiple instances of Samuel stating with absolute certainty before today that the Magic will be a better team with Vince than they were with Hedo. And in the past couple threads, Samuel’s the one talking copying and pasting Vince Carter’s career accomplishments from Wikipedia, trashing Hedo’s game, and mocking the very idea that “Hedo-for-Vince” might not improve the Magic.

All I said today (and all I ever said before) is that the addition of superstars does not always improve a team. All I did above was point out some examples of that and ask for Samuel to admit the possibility that Hedo might have been better for SVG’s Magic than Vince will be. I never, ever, ever said that I know for sure that Vince won’t fit. On the contrary, I’ve used the term “the Vince experiment” for a reason – because none of us know how it will turn out.

And yet somehow Samuel has the gall to throw me the question “How the hell do you know?” And somehow that’s a valid point?

Sorry, but hypocrisy is never a valid point.

Joe Mama

October 3rd, 2009
2:25 pm

Samuel is right on point! This sociological prophesying without the degree is a flaw. You don’t know what will happen until it happens. Sounds like another false prophet. When is the world going to end Mother Focker?

Dezz Nuttz

October 3rd, 2009
2:27 pm

Prophey about dezz NuttZ

thehawksleftthenest

October 3rd, 2009
2:32 pm

BosnianBaller agian you are mistaken hedo is not the mpv of the orlando magic in the post season both dwight and reshard played better than him and i live in orlando and am pretty sure that the orlando starting line up when lewis comes back will be howard,lewis,barnes,carter,nelson and yes carter’s points will go down but his field goal percentige and assist will go up since he will have more open shots that in new yersey and will have better players around him and agian i’ve watched hedo play alot and he is not as good as what you describe him to be… he is not a x factor look at his season stats there not that great and you are basing your argument on 3 or 4 playoff games
niremetal i do understand your point of view but you have to understand that vince is playing for his hometown team and is motivated to win a championship and he is going to be the 3rd scoring opition so he does not have to carry a team on his back a perfect example of this could be ray allen when he was in seatle he had to carry that team but as soon as he got to boston he became the 3rd scoring option and look how that turned out….

Dezz Nuttz

October 3rd, 2009
2:32 pm

A Thinking Fan

October 3rd, 2009
5:21 pm

The FLASH is back! Good post too…

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
6:49 pm

A Thinking Fan ,

I don’t know. Flash only seems to make cameo appearances these days. I miss his posts, as they were always very well put and full of knowledge, not a bunch of hyperbole and low on conjecture. Dude always came with stuff that forced me to be on my game if I was going to contend with his opinion.

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
6:55 pm

Nire ,

How is Samuel’s question not valid? I contend that it’s valid, but I also say that it’s valid OUTSIDE of the argument y’all are having. The question is actually relevant to the argument, but it is relevant to any argument. Hence, it does not enhance the argument in any way, but also cannot be ignored. It’s a fall back, if nothing else.

Besides, wouldn’t you say that it also applies to Flash’s argument, regardless of whether you agreed with his viewpoint or not? Yes, you would, and rather conveniently, at that. Sorry, but I don’t view the question itself as hypocritical.

The use of it? Well, now that is a different story…

Fork Tongue Review Board

October 3rd, 2009
7:05 pm

Facts are not opinions. Facts are proven, evidence. An opinion “assumes facts not in evidence”.

There is a reason they play the games. Samuel question is not only valid, but well taken.

KevinA

October 3rd, 2009
7:06 pm

Like it takes a village to raise a child, if Orlando wants a championship all roads run through Howard. If I am Gundy I would be benching anybody that can’t drive and dump off to Howard. While it is important for Carter and Lewis to spread the floor with their all star talent, next year should be thinking of Howard for MVP.

The same style of play will be important for the Hawks only spread between three players. If we don’t get the ball to Marvin/Josh and Al we will sit on 47 wins. To get to 52+ we got to go low. Or in Marvins case, drive the ball. Both the Hawks and Orlando shoot to many jumpers.

niremetal

October 3rd, 2009
7:10 pm

Ray,

Again, you have to take a closer look at what I said. I wasn’t attacking the question itself, but only his use of it. I never said it wasn’t a valid question as a general rule. Just said that it wasn’t a valid point in that situation because I never said I “knew” what would happen this coming year. Samuel, on the other hand, did. Which means that his use of the question was hypocritical.

That being said, it might have been valid with respect to these nameless writers and bloggers who have said with certainty that Vince won’t fit…but even that seems to me to be a straw man, because none of those writers/bloggers are around here. He was the one puffing his chest and talking like he could see the future. Anyway…

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
7:35 pm

Niremetal ,

Sorry about the last post, which was actually meant to be a response to the e-mail you sent. I’m apparently trying to do too many things at once, if I’m making such a serious blunder by referring to things that nobody on this blog can see the relevance or connection to. I apologize for that.

niremetal

October 3rd, 2009
7:40 pm

S’all good Ray. Not everyone has as much time on their hands as I do these days :D

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
7:44 pm

Nire ,

In regard to your contest with Samuel, I was merely lending credence to the question itself, in regard to all of us and all of our arguments.

Read MY post more closely, and see that I never addressed either of you directly, I simply talked about your argument. I said you both brought up good points. And then I lent credence to the question he asked in the end. I didn’t say that his question was valid in connection to the argument. Sorry if you took it that way. Like I said before, it’s valid in connection with any opinion-based argument that has to do with seeing into the future, or the “woulda/coulda/shoulda” past.

And I recognize the difference between a question or statement in a vaccum, versus the use of it in an argument. You mentioned hypocrisy, and I was TRYING to explain to you that I know the difference between the value of a statement or question within a vaccum, versus the use of it. Hence my ending comments:

“Sorry, but I don’t view the question itself as hypocritical.

The use of it? Well, now that is a different story…”

KevinA

October 3rd, 2009
7:49 pm

Ya know Bill Clinton lost much of his support by trying to define if. A lot of if is just opinion. I would never try to slow the dig through the weeds. Through the chaff of much weed mass there does come new insight on occasion. The grain of wheat of intellectual bread base. Ya’ll plant it, grow it, harvest it and I’ll eat some of it. If the straw gets thick – even a truck full of grain can burn a field down if not properly watched.

thehawksleftthenest

October 3rd, 2009
7:56 pm

BosnianBaller vince is better than hedo…
and how is hedo the mvp of the magic in the post season when
dwight averaged 20.3 points 15.3 rebounds
rashard averaged 19 points 6.4 rebounds
hedo averaged 15.8 points 4.5 rebounds
yea it sure looks like he had the best post season NOT!!! hedo was over hyped this offseason

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
8:01 pm

Joe Mama ,

I’m glad you didn’t take that too personally. We gotta move past our differences somehow, and I usually try to use humor to do so. By the way, I get the feeling that you may be right about Shaq’s impact in Cleveland. Scary for us…

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
8:01 pm

KevinA ,

Never heard it put that way before. Nice.

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
8:05 pm

I’ll say this: Vince is a more dangerous player than Hedo, regardless of the system he’s in. He just is.

Hedo made the Magic go, as the offense ran through him. As in, the offense didn’t revolve around just his ability to score, but also through his ability to move the ball around to the right people, score when necessary, be a threat to score at all times, etc. He’s a true point forward.

Vince can’t do that. So that begs two questions. Can Hedo have a similar effect in Toronto, where there is a credible pg (who I think is actually better than Jameer, when you’re talking about the position itself, at least)? And…will Vince be more effective for Orlando than Hedo was, or less effective?

esitser

October 3rd, 2009
8:37 pm

If this was my first time on this blog,I would have thought this was a Magic blog.Please leave Vince and Hedo alone.Can we have a new update or something.Pleassssssse Sekou.

KevinA

October 3rd, 2009
8:38 pm

Ray I was a preachers kid and when young went on wheat harvest. I am just past the half centurion mark so I don’t sweat the small stuff. I stumbled onto this blog last season and really enjoyed the material. Being a Hawks fan for 5 years this blog and yours gave me an opportunity to exchange ideas. I had never blogged before so it was and still remains a real challenge to put thoughts into words. To make it even more difficult I try try to communicate through a rum based thought process. I think we have a great format and a base of bloggers that sometimes gets a little wild, but would not exchange for any other I have seen. Gotta love the computer age.

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
10:04 pm

11:18 post by The Flash was straight up ON POINT, if you ask me. That explains Detroit, and it certainly explains Ben Wallace. It explains other things as well, but at the risk of inflammation, I’ll leave it alone. ;)

Big Ray

October 3rd, 2009
10:07 pm

KevinA ,

Glad to know I have, in some finite way, enriched your blogging experience. And rum is great stuff ;) . Written many a blog or post under it’s effects, lol!

richbrave

October 3rd, 2009
11:25 pm

doc:

Remember my asking you about J-CRIT injuring himself in ATLANTA’s summer league? Here’s the upshot.

Crittenton Out At Least Two Weeks
Javaris Crittenton didn’t know what to expect when he had an MRI on Friday, but he knew that the pain in his left foot had become so unbearable that he couldn’t push through any longer. After arguably his best practice this week, Crittenton was shut down for the final minutes of practice. And, after the MRI revealed what he already knew — that he had a double bone bruise and a strained tendon — Crittenton had to accept that he would be out of action for at least two weeks.

“It’s frustrating,” said Crittenton, who originally hurt himself playing in the Atlanta Pro Am league in late July. “I wanted to come out because it’s training camp and we got a lot of guards. We got to compete. But it’s one of those injuries, you’ve got to give it time and let it heal, because if you keep playing on it, it could be a potential surgery or it keeps nagging you throughout the season, then I can’t play. I decided to sit it out and let it heal.”

Crittenton, wearing a protective boot, is still smarting over how the injury occurred. He said that his team was nursing a 12-point in the final minute and he was milking the shot clock when his defender came charging at him to pressure the ball. Crittenton said he dribbled around him, but the defender stepped on his heal, pushed down then fell on top of him.

“I should’ve gotten out the game,” Crittenton said, shaking his head. “I thought it was a tweak at first. I tried to get up and walk and I fell back down. I had to be carried off the court. I knew it was serious. But I didn’t know it was going to keep me out this long.”

Crittenton said he wore a protective boot while in Atlanta and upon his return to Washington but his foot never healed properly. He hadn’t done any conditioning until the day before training camp. The grueling schedule, with two-a-day practices, eventually took its toll. “I felt a little bit of soreness in pain over the days, but I’ve been able to make it through every practice,” Crittenton said. On Friday, “I had to sit down, I couldn’t really do it anymore.”

Our man has no luck. With FOYE and MILLER in the house, he’s headed out the door. DAMMED shame. I saw lots of good things in his play for the WIZ last year. Some team ought to tap him for PG behind a starter, and a solid back-up. If he could stay in a system for awhile, he just might learn something, and become a standout. I think he has the ability.

Samuel

October 4th, 2009
5:39 am

Say No to “Bootleg” tournaments. These guys are stupid as Hell. Why risk millions at these pickup games back home. Work out yes but save the competition until when it counts.

Stupid As_.

bigdave

October 4th, 2009
6:33 pm

bigdave

October 4th, 2009
6:34 pm

meanwhile… back at the ranch…

richbrave

October 4th, 2009
6:34 pm

SAMUEL:

I’m sure CRITTER agrees with you — NOW!!!!

richbrave

October 4th, 2009
6:39 pm

BIG RAY:

Say hey RAY. ‘ZUP in the ATLANTA mean streets? BRAVES done, I’m back for awhile. Where’s doc and ANDO?

richbrave

October 4th, 2009
6:44 pm

BIG RAY:

FLASH’s point about BROWN knowing how to utilize his talent and SAUNDERS being clueless in that regard makes me break out in a sweat over the ‘ZARDS. Not that last season didn’t leave a clammy chill on my bones. I see the anointed one is out already, but with a broken finger rather than his knee. That hasn’t really been tested yet. I wonder if anyone really believes GILBO will pick up where he left off two years ago, and be a super-star after THREE knee jobs. No way IMO.

niremetal

October 4th, 2009
7:06 pm

Richbrave,

I think Arenas thinks he can pick up right where he left off, and that he’ll shoot accordingly. That, combined with the atrocious frontcourt that Washington has, could make for a very long season. And I’m still waiting for someone to tell me who exactly will play on-ball defense for the Wiz besides Oberto…

Big Ray

October 4th, 2009
10:54 pm

Richbrave ,

What’s up, man? I really feel bad for Crittenton. I think he’s a good kid and a good talent. He’s gotta get a break somewhere, sometime. I hope, anyway. Doc is around, he’s saving his verve for the regular season. Ando is around (I think), and we’re doing the fan blog again. It’s called Hawks Fan Nest now.

I wouldn’t sweat it too much with Flip Saunders. He’s a decent/good coach. He couldn’t optimize what he had in Detroit, but then I’m not sure anybody outside of Larry Brown really could. Popovich or Sloan, maybe. Or Rudy Tomjanovich. Maybe even Pat Riley. Flip wasn’t in the best spot, but he did have those guys winning. They just couldn’t stay at the very top of the Eastern conference. Not that Joe Dumars was a big help…

Nire ,

I wouldn’t wait on that…

Ariose

October 4th, 2009
11:02 pm

Shaq can go eat corn chips o_0

We’ll run his arse ragged!!!!

kc15aa

October 5th, 2009
5:06 am

He does not show up in playoffs and always plays well when we are up. Take a look at the facts ATL.

Daniel

October 5th, 2009
9:01 am

What’s up crew? Hope everyone had a good weekend.
Ray- sorry about that, I guess I was in a stirring things up mood. I know you were just teasing with me, but I actually do feel bad about going after truth-serum. If I think he is being inappropriate for insulting other people, how am I any better by insulting him?

So that being said, I would like to apologize.

Daniel

October 5th, 2009
9:07 am

In terms of the VC vs. Tuk debate: Obviously, we will not really know how it will work until the season starts. VC is very talented, probably has more skill than Turk in some ways. I am one that tends to believe that the move will hurt the Magic. Turk is a better facilitator and his size really created problems for other teams when playing with Lewis. I also think that the Magic WAY over paid for Gortat. But, the addition of Bass can really change that teams ability to score in the post with either him or Howard cleaning the boards off the back side. I think the addition of Bass more than makes up for any possible drop with the VC move. I think Orlando or Clevland is the team to beat in the East. Boston is most likely (didn’t say it would happen) to drop out of the top three.

hock

October 7th, 2009
1:28 am

Why did he need to comment on this situation now and thereby create a season-long distraction? Oh well, this team isn’t going to win the East anyway.

LAKERFAN007

October 7th, 2009
9:48 am

Joe has lost his mind. No other team will pay him that kind of money. He is just a good player. Not a franchise player or anything like that. He was lucky with this past contract of 70 Million over five years. Let him go and use that cap money to get WADE or somebody better than him.