The gang’s all here!

With the starting five (plus a few more) back and under contract for the foreseeable future, the Hawks have at least given themselves a fighting chance to compete with the big boys.

With the starting five (plus a few more) back and under contract for the foreseeable future, the Hawks have at least given themselves a fighting chance to compete with the big boys (photo courtesy of my main man and former AJC photographer Pouya Dianat).

HAWKSVILLE - If continuity means anything in the NBA these days, the Hawks have done right by their own this summer.

Marvin Williams touched on it last week during a conversation we had the day before he signed his new contract, and again this afternoon in a teleconference with the media to discuss his new deal. A day after my initial talk with Williams, Al Horford and I discussed continuity briefly while he took a break from his work with the Basketball Without Borders program.

Dating back to last summer and extending all the way through training camp this year, the Hawks (if they can come to terms with captain and All-Star Joe Johnson on an extension) will have spent millions to keep their core in place for the foreseeable future.

“I think management is making the commitment to keep us together,” Williams said Tuesday. “And each year we’ve gotten better.”

Josh Smith’s $58 million deal was the first domino, albeit an offer sheet from Memphis to the restricted free agent power forward last summer that the Hawks matched before the ink was dry on the offer sheet. That swift move was followed up this summer with deals for Mike Bibby (3-years, $18 million), Zaza Pachulia (4-years, $19 million) and Williams (5-years, $37.5 million-base). Johnson’s 4-year extension, if signed, would be in the $64 million-range.

Full disclosure, math was never my strongest subject in school. But that’s a lot of cash spent, rightfully, on the heart, soul and guts of your team. Any team dreaming of winning big at the NBA level has to invest in its core or risk vanishing into the ether.

 

When Al Horord talks, people listen.

When Hawks center Al Horord talks,in English or Spanish, people tend to listen.

What the Hawks have done is neither groundbreaking nor extraordinary in the world of professional sports. But for a franchise mired in a malaise of mediocrity for the better part of a decade prior to the last 13 months, it’s a pretty impressive feat. ”Obviously, I think it’s pretty important to build on to what we’ve started,” Horford said during our phone conversation last week. And he would know, having played on successful teams every year of his college and professional career to date. “I’m glad Marv got his deal done, because we’re going to need all our guys back and ready to go this season.”

By no means does this excuse the Hawks from the responsibility of filling out the roster with quality players capable of supporting that core group. But it certainly helps that the core is in place right now – a nucleus with three wildly talented youngsters in Horford, Williams and Smith. That would be a heck of a core group by itself. So to have JJ, Bibby, Zaza, rookie Jeff Teague and even Jamal Crawford to add to the list makes the list that much more impressive. It’ll look even better with the addition of a name like Joe Smith, still in the works according to some well-placed sources that insist the Hawks won’t give up until someone pries Smith from their dead claws.

Will it win a championship in a league where the defending champion Los Angeles Lakers have stockpiled elite talent to go around Kobe Bryant and the Boston Celtics have assembled a star-studded army to battle the Lakers, Cleveland and Orlando for supremacy? No way. But the same can be said for solid young teams in places like Portland and Chicago as well. That’s just the reality of the situation.

What a rock-solid core does is give the Hawks a fighting chance to be relevant now and into the future. And despite cries for titles (things, mind you, that Hawks fans have never experienced) relevancy is the tangible goal that all teams must focus on before moving into championship mode.

Having witnessed my favorite team’s lone championship season of my lifetime (scroll down to the bottom, it’s there, I swear), I can sympathize with the desire to shed the middle ground for the higher ground. Having witnessed that championship season also made it painfully clear to me just how rare those occasions are, even when you have seemingly all the resources in the world at your disposal, that your squad actually cashes in on the big prize.

Would I trade 40 years of rooting for a a competitive or even upper-tier team for one title? Absolutely. But if I can get both, even if the titles only come once every 50 years, I’m not turning that down either. Back to my original point, and I apologize for swerving off course a bit but it is football season (and I smell a comeback season cooking in Ann Arbor), it all comes down to perspective for me.

Is it more important to be relevant and potentially a true player or not? I say stay relevant (given whatever constraints might be in place, and it’s no secret the Hawks have many) as long as you can. We’ve all seen the flip side and it’s ugly, real ugly.

Where the Hawks fit in the grand scheme of things depends on your perspective, as well. If being the fourth team in a three-team Eastern Conference race doesn’t strike you, that’s understandable. And they will have challenger for that fourth spot. But they certainly seems sure of themselves.

“I feel like people are obviously starting to respect our ball club,” Williams said during his teleconference. “People realize they are not going to come into Atlanta and get an easy win. I don’t think anybody in the league is doing that anymore. We’ve shown the last few years we can compete with anybody in the league. We certainly feel like we can compete with anybody in the league.”

488 comments Add your comment

JM

August 11th, 2009
3:49 pm

First.

wiggle, wiggle! Thanks sir links.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
3:51 pm

From last blog.

Ken, if Salim messed up, Woody would bring in Joe. If Acie… Bibby. If Solo – Josh Smith. See the pattern? He would answer a bonehead play by bringing in a player (who presumably) would be LESS likely to make another 2 more bonehead plays. And by doing that, the player learns AND the team has an improved chance to win. If Marvin continues to mess up and Othella Hunter is the only available substitute, then Woody would likely be doing the team a tremendous disservice. Because chances are, every 2 Marvin mistakes would become 4-5 mistakes from Hunter. I don’t consider that being inconsistent, I think that is keeping the ultimate goal in mind. Giving yourself the best chance to win the game at hand. Sure, when we were a “re-building” team, player development was the primary goal. We have passed that phase now. And if Marvin continues to make the same mistake and hurt the team, then Sund either needs to find a better bench substitute or get Marvin out the door (the use of Marvin as an example was illustrative only and for the reading pleasure of Sam/Rod).

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
3:58 pm

That all sounds great until you get to the end of the season and all your best players are tired, sore, and dragging…

JM

August 11th, 2009
3:58 pm

Now to the blog. So Sekou, if we lock up our core, and ownership wants to keep the core together, how do the Hawks get a game changing 5 in the next couple years. Or is this going to be it? I don’t think we are at championship level now, but how do we get the 5 most people think we need to get to the next level? I say trade Marvin if there is interest next season. Someone has to go to get a legit big in the near future.

O'Brien

August 11th, 2009
4:05 pm

From last blog.

If I’m the head coach, and my star player pounds the ball too long, disrupting my team’s offense, I would be constantly in his ear telling him to pass the ball. But Woody lets JJ do whatever he wants. I agree JJ should know better, and the other players need to get open. However, it all starts with the head coach.

After all, whose responsibility is it to:
1) call plays to get the front court more shots?
2) have the team run more screens to get JJ some easy shots?
3) call plays to get Marvin more open looks
4) call more plays for Josh around the basket?

I blame Woody and JJ for the iso, but ultimately, Woody is in charge, so he gets most of the blame.

Sekou Smith

August 11th, 2009
4:16 pm

You need your core locked up so you can move pieces later to get it right JM. You’re going to move somebody at some point, that’s just a given. In most cases you have to give up an asset or two to get a valuable asset, or two, in return.

In the meantime, it serves the Hawks well to have their core group under contract (and reasonable contracts in just about every case) so they’ll have the flexibility to wheel and deal when they plateau. And that’s when, and only when, you take a jackhammer to this team. The minute they stop climbing is when you start moving pieces around.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
4:17 pm

And player development sounds great when you’re winning 26 games and you start looking at draft possibilities during the All-Star break. The ultimate, is to add depth with players whose best years weren’t in the AAU.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
4:17 pm

What is the measurement that our offense doesn’t work? The playoffs?

JM

August 11th, 2009
4:28 pm

Best case scenario would be able to move up in the draft next year to get an up and coming 5, but i doubt that will happen so someone has to go and I would move Marvin. That plateau may come sooner than we think, Sekou.

Truth Hurts

August 11th, 2009
4:28 pm

By O’brien

Remember that game when Bibby passed the ball to an open Josh (who then missed his 20 ft jump shot)? Woody yelled at Bibby, saying he should not have passed it to Josh. Bibby yelled back at Woody, saying (and I paraphrase) “Josh was open, so I passed it to him. If you dont want him shooting those shots, then tell him not to hang out that far from the basket”.

That was just one example, but in my opinion, it’s on Woody for not being more creative offensively. How many games did we lose (especially the first 3 years (before Bibby) when we had the last shot, but the whole world knew JJ would pound the ball, and then force a bad shot at the buzzer? How about trusting other players?

Woody has no offensive creativity. If I’m the head coach, and my star player pounds the ball too long, disrupting my team’s offense, I would be constantly in his ear telling him to pass the ball. But Woody lets JJ do whatever he wants. I agree JJ should know better, but it starts with the head coach.

After all, whose responsibility is it to:
1) call plays to get the front court more shots?
2) have the team run more screens to get JJ some easy shots?
3) call plays to get Marvin more open looks
4) call more plays for Josh around the basket?

I blame Woody and JJ for the iso, but ultimately, Woody is in charge, so he gets most of the blame.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
4:30 pm

This team has not plateaued but Woodson has. I just have too much of his butt hair in my eyes to see it.

Mike

August 11th, 2009
4:34 pm

And let’s remember that we were a 4 seed and won 47 games with 3 starters ages 23 and younger. Continued improvement will mean 50 + wins and actually making the 2nd round competitive. You can’t break up a core when many of them havent even come close to entering their prime. Now while I agree that Woodys coaching style holds these guys back we still have way too much to look forward to this season.

As these guys improve and get even more experience the gap will close this season and beyond. Now if we can add the veteran big (joe smith), we will have a nice 10 man rotation. And if Woody can use it correctly we will have some fresh legs come playoff time.

Truth Hurts

August 11th, 2009
4:37 pm

The measurment of our offense is how consistant it is. Our offense is not consistent. Strike that it’s Woodsons offense that isn’t consistant. The playoffs showed that or does anybody think that Miami is nearly as good as the Hawks even though they have Dwane Wade? What players are being added to the team this year that had their best years in aau? That was last year.

UGA

August 11th, 2009
4:37 pm

Sekou,

I want Joe Smith.

But, is Mikki Moore or Brian Skinner being mentioned with the Hawks???

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
4:38 pm

I floss my teeths with Woodrows butt hair.

UGA

August 11th, 2009
4:40 pm

Anakin Joe,

Is there something wrong with you? That’s just nasty.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
4:41 pm

I like it when Woody slips me his woody.

Mike

August 11th, 2009
4:43 pm

Anakin Joe…I definitely agree with you about Woodson. The second round is as far as he will ever get us. But the core of our team has the potential to go much farther together. Hopefully Sund will realize this before its too late

Mike

August 11th, 2009
4:51 pm

well agree with most of what you said about Woody

All I'm Saying Is...

August 11th, 2009
5:02 pm

To all you Woody haters: Billy Knight signed Woody and rest assured that Rick Sund will use Woody’s last year on his deal and our accomplishments this season to determine whether Rick keeps him around and that will work as long as we handle our business on the floor and at a minimum match what we did last season (i.e. no worse than a #4 seed and win the first round series). If we don’t match last years performance, pencil in Avery as the next coach.

Sekou: Re-signing our core (i.e. players drafted by or traded for by Billy Knight) is a smart move by Rick Sund and he is to be commended for drafting Teague and adding Crawford. And signing Joe Smith may be a plus but Sund has not addressed our most glaring need: Center. Count me as one of many who believe that we need big bodies and/or defensive pressure in the middle. Adding Joe Smith will help but signing Siler is a move we have to make given that we made no effort to get Tyson Chandler or Theo Ratliff, both of whom would have been a worthy Center to add to our squad given our need in that spot.

UGA: Mikki Moore has no game. Granted, he’s 7′ and can run the floor but I’ve never seen the guy display any skill other than taking up space and given his spindly frame he doesn’t even do that well.

LET’S GO HAWKS!

GeeMack

August 11th, 2009
5:06 pm

Well Sekou, get the jackhammer ready because next year this team will peak. If they get 3 more wins this season. I will be shocked. The Hawks are the 5th best team in the east behind (Bos, Cle, Orl, and a healthy Wash). Notice the resemblence of those team. They all trot out 3 all stars in there starting line up.

Mike,

Woody is not the problem with this team its talent. You can’t beat a Bos, Cle, Orl, LA, or SA when they have far better talent. You take the best player on the Hawks (JJ), and he’s the 3 or 4th best players on one of those teams including washington.

So you can’t fire Woody until you give him the player that can win.

UGA

August 11th, 2009
5:13 pm

As far as Mikki Moore, look how well he played against the Hawks last year. He had 10 boards against us one game. My only point is if we strike out on Joe Smith, we have to get someone and he may be the best left.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
5:28 pm

AJ,

For me, it’s the old eye test. We won 47 games, yes, but we looked butt ugly winning many of them. (Still, I wouldn’t give any of the 47 back) ;-)

When we shot well, the offense was considered to have worked. That doesn’t mean it was well conceived. It was not. Our shooters had to overcome our lack of imagination.

Case in point, how many not GREAT, but just GOOD plays do you remember coming out of timeouts? Just a solid play to get a good look?

That’s what I thought.

And how many times did we refuse to adjust on offense? Let me count the ways.

No, on second thought, I don’t have that much time.

Ernest

August 11th, 2009
5:28 pm

Sekou, who checks for posts eaten by the ‘blog monster’ on your blogs? Usually when I give it an hour it shows up but it’s been a while now…

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
5:35 pm

Please notice the picture above. If you look closely, there is about an inch difference between Joe, Josh, Marvin and Al. I have argued with some people on this blog mostly about Marvin and Josh. Reading the blog before the last one, someone again made the ignorant statement that Marvin is our best perimeter defender. That is just not true, so please think before you type. Out of our starters, the best defensive players are hands down Joe and Josh. Both are able to defend multiple positions, Joe from the 1 to the 3 and Josh from the 5 to the 2. That is not to say that they can do it on a consistent basis, or do a great job, but they can, and have done it during their careers. Marvin can only defend the 3 and sometimes the 2 but lacks the lateral quickness to guard most 2’s in the league. He will get his lunch taken by 95% of the 4’s in the league. Being that the blog topic is about the core staying together, I would propose that for the Hawks to be as successful as they want to be this year, they will have to play small ball. I think that by midseason or maybe at the beginning of the season, Woodson will have to realize that his best starting lineup will be Bibby/Teague (1), Jamal (2), Joe(3), Josh (4) and Horford (5). Marvin, Teague/Bibby, Zaza first off the bench. Joe can play the 3 and will have an advantage offensively against most 3 ’s in the league, especially with the iso Joe play. Jamal will be needed on the floor with Joe to take pressure off of Joe, and to put another strong offensive presence, and ball handler on the floor that teams have to respect. Obviously teams do not respect Josh, Marvin or Al enough offensively to not leave them wide open. With Crawford on the floor, I pray that teams do double and triple Joe. Just my 2 cents.

S.L

August 11th, 2009
5:44 pm

Hey Sekou,

Good article – didnt know you were a Michigan Man. Go Blue (and hope we have a better season this year). Back to the Hawks – If we can get a little bit of size in the addition to a proven veteran ie – Joe Smith, and maybe an additional athlete ie- Stromile Swift then the Hawks have a chance to not only maintain that 4spot but could fight for the 3rd spot if Teague, and Crawford impress and of course we stay healthy. The More bigs the better we need some bodies to throw at the Cavs, Boston and even Orlando. Should be a good year nonetheless – GO hawks

Rufus1

August 11th, 2009
5:45 pm

I am HAPPY!!!

I know that one day we will have to trade Marvin or Josh, but I am glad we will have them for a few more years. I would have liked to have a new coach by now, but I will be happy just having the cake and not eating it.
It will come down which player develops the trait each is missing to be a STAR(Marvin-Aggression Josh-a Jump shot). I believe that will day the Hawks will be championship bound.

Imagine It

Eastern conf.finals
Josh goes for 35pts 12rbs 8ast and hits the game winning 3 in Lebrons face. SUCKA!!

OR

Marvin goes for 30pts 10rbs 10ast and hits a fade away jump shot in that PUNK Mo Williams grill to win it!!

I will watch with glee as those busters from Cleveland cry, because Lebron was turned away again from a Title.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
5:48 pm

Rod,

In my opinion, iso Joe is MUCH better against 2’s than 3’s. And I’m not sure Joe can handle guarding LeBron, Pierce, Turkoglu, etc. for the entire season.

Of course if we stick with that “switch every pick” nonsense than it’s a moot point.
There IS a time for that, but not all night.

I’m sure we’ll see that lineup some, but I’ll be VERY surprised if that’s a permanent starting lineup.

Ken Strickland

August 11th, 2009
5:55 pm

GEEMACK-the team with far better talent isn’t necessarily the better team. There have been a number of teams with far better individual talent than the Spurs over the yrs, but the Spurs have proven to be the better team.

ANAKIN JOE-I can see why you are such a Woodson supporter. You seem to share his unwillingness to see beyond the obvious, and like him you can’t seem to accept that you just might be wrong. Both of you blame the players for everything that’s wrong with the team.

Ramon

August 11th, 2009
6:02 pm

Everyone is talking about a game changing 5, that is funny. There is really only 3 to 6 of those in the league. Someone real quick name 6 centers in the league better than Horford. After you do that, remember this is only his 3rd season he’s entering. Many of you want another center but would any of you REALLY trade Horford for Oden today? If Luc Longley, Bill Wennington, Greg Ostertag, and others play at the 5 was good enough not to prevent their team from going to the finals, I don’t see how Horford wouldn’t be. I mentioned those two teams because neither one of those team had a PF with said C taller than 6′9. If you don’t believe many C’s around the league respect Horford and have their own problems with him at that position, then look again. Yao Ming is the only C who is a game changer and available. Biedrins, Chandler, Okafor, Curry, Dampier, Perkins, Nene, B. Miller, and others are players who produce less than Horford, yet all except for Biedrins have already peaked or entered into their prime. And Biedrins doesn’t have any better chance matching up to Howard and Shaq than Horford. Horford didn’t get owned in the paint except for when he was in foul trouble and had no one to BACK him up. But as far as starting C’s in this league, what we have is better than 75% of the league, and still getting better. Honestly, this is the best starting 5 talent wise that I EVER remember the Hawks having (including Nique’s squads). And then Nique wasn’t that game changer at age 23 that would WIN games like that. Mookie’s Hawks were all in their 30s. So I say take this starting 5, and if it doesn’t reach expectations, let the coach go before anyone in the starting 5.

CTrim

August 11th, 2009
6:16 pm

Now that Powe has signed with Cleveland maybe Joe Smith comes here after all.

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
6:18 pm

Out of our starters, the best defensive players are hands down Joe and Josh. Both are able to defend multiple positions, Joe from the 1 to the 3 and Josh from the 5 to the 2.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You actually think Josh can guard a 2? Take your own advice and think before you type. Or at least watch a goddamned game before you type, RodSam.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
6:19 pm

Ramon,

Big co-sign

fudd21

August 11th, 2009
6:23 pm

Rod, come on now man. You say that Josh can defend the 2 thru 5 but then say Marvin lacks the lateral quickness to defend the 2. You honestly believe that Josh lateral quickness is better than Marvin. Have you really paid attention when Josh is on the perimeter trying to defend someone. He doesn’t even look right trying to get in a good defensive stance. Most of the times those 3 get by him going to the hole. Now I will admit that Josh has the closing speed and uncanny ability to meet them at the rim that Marvin doesn’t but lateral quickness. Marvin does a MUCH better job of staying in front of people when guarding on the perimeter. SO I have to beg to differ with you on that one Bro.

Ken Strickland

August 11th, 2009
6:28 pm

ROD-I’m not sure you can make a blanket statement about Josh or Joe being hands down the best DEF players on our team. Josh has proven to be our best shotblocker and off the ball defender, but his on the ball DEF is lacking, oompared to AHorford, JJohnson and MWilliams. Playing a constantly switching DEF, and having a swinging door in Bibby at the point, makes it more difficult for our frontline players to concentrate on guarding the individual player they’re assigned to defend.

Marvin has developed into an excellent defender and his DEF versatility is definitely an asset. If I had to determine the best defensive player, I’d chose AHorford. He’s more physical and a better on the ball defender than JSmith, or any other player on our team, and is our best defender when going up against bigger, taller and stronger players. He’s also our 2nd best shotblocker behind JSmith. That type of versatility makes him the best candidate for the teams best defensive player.

RealSquawk

August 11th, 2009
6:32 pm

Did you ever in your wildest dreams thing a Hawks summer could go like this? If the Joes sign our team will be locked up on reasonable contracts and flexibility for the future. Something I never thought possible as a Hawks fan. And Sekou you make a great point. Lock up your talent and then make your changes accordingly. Not only do we have all of our desired pieces the prices are reasonable and we still have the rights to childress if he ever returns.

The Truth

August 11th, 2009
6:34 pm

Ken Strickland

Homeboy you are in rare form today. Keep’em on their heals. As you already know, the best defense is a good offense.

Professor

August 11th, 2009
6:34 pm

I would like to see what a new coach can do with this squad while we still have pretty much the same players. If we change the squad and the coach, then it will be said that Woodson didn’t have a team to win with. I still think this is a quality squad, especially if we can land Joe Smith.

cp

August 11th, 2009
6:34 pm

Tyson Chandler is an overpaid injury prone center. I’m glad we did not try to acquire him. Some people on here want a 7 footer regardless if the guy is good or not just so they can say we have a 7 footer. We will see what kind of numbers Tyson puts up now that he does not have CP3 throwing him those lobs.

cp

August 11th, 2009
6:36 pm

Anybody who thinks Josh Smith can defend 2 guards cannot be taken seriously ever ever ever. You lose all credibility with that nonsense.

rich

August 11th, 2009
6:40 pm

ctrim , good point I think Joe Smith is locked out of Boston, and Cleveland with the latest signing. I think we now have a good chance to land Joe.

Mystikal

August 11th, 2009
6:42 pm

Hey Sekou,

If for some reason we come out of the gate slow and have a very underwhelming record, how long before Woodson gets the axe? Not that this will happen, but just for arguments sake, what would you guess?

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
6:44 pm

Stating the Obvious and fudd21,

I actually have seen Josh guard Kobe, Wade, Iggy, Carter …. You guys have such short memories. I can remember a couple years ago when Woodson thought Josh was the defensive stopper for everyone. One game in particular I seem to recall was Miami. Wade was one on one with Josh at the top of the key, drove and got his shot blocked to preserve the win in Atlanta. Wade did his notorious falling to get a call, but refs did not call it. I can recall last year Vince Carter at the end of games agianst us when he hit the game winner, Josh was defending him, not Marvin. Actually I do beleive that his lateral quickness is better, as well as his recovery ability. His shot blocking ability alone makes up for any lateral quickness he may not have. When you get by Marvin, that’s it. Not Josh. Do you guys really watch the games?

Sautee,

Not sure. I would prefer Joe defensively on Pierce and Lebron depending on foul trouble. I think he does a much better defensive job than Marvin on the perimeter. See the playoffs against Boston, Pierce’s eyes lit up everytime Marvin was guarding him. Turk, I would prefer Marvin.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
6:45 pm

Anyone hear the Marvin conference call recording?
http://www.nba.com/media/hawks/ConfCall_Marvin_Williams_081109.mp3

He said that this summer, his focus is on improving his ballhandling (along with just practicing the usual). Let’s hope his ballhandling improves this summer as much as his three point shooting and defense improved last summer. If he can get an off-the-dribble game to complement his perimeter shot and his ability to get to (and convert from) the line…well, damn. We’d be able to have two guys on the floor at any given time (JJ/Marvin, JJ/Jamal, or Marvin/Jamal) who can score both off the dribble and standing still. It’s very tough to gameplan against a team like that.

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
6:47 pm

Ken Strickland,

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
6:48 pm

RodSam,

You mean the play where Marvin started off guarding Vince but Josh switched onto him after the Nets set a double-screen for him? Oh sorry I forgot. You only watch YouTube clips of games rather than the actual games. My b.

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
6:48 pm

*JJ started off guarding Vince, not Marv.

Mystikal

August 11th, 2009
6:54 pm

Ramon,

With you on that!

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
6:56 pm

Or this shot by Wade where JJ started off guarding Vince and then Josh switched onto him after a screen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLsHMb-tnNI&feature=related

Samuel

August 11th, 2009
7:01 pm

What’s so interesting is that photo. If they are all standing on the same floor. There’s not an inch difference in any of our 4 big guys. Either Al isn’t really 6′10 or Marvin has grown an inch.

Cuz,

Glad to know we have another realist here.

Did someone here mention football. I must say that this is the first time in a long time that i’ve actually been longing for the season to start. Ole Miss pre-season #10, Mississippi State will finally have a wide open offense(Got another name for ya: Chad Bumphis, Freshman WR from Tupelo.Said he was a pro “at something” since the 5th grade), MV7 set to return to the League.

Michigan football. I don’t know about that. If it aint the SEC, it aint football.Cuz, you know that. I do like T. Pryor from OSU though.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
7:01 pm

JM, Beleive me when I tell you it was MY PLEASURE LOL!!!!

Nire, Great Find!!!

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
7:02 pm

And Ray and Sautee and the guys on Peachtree Hoops and Lang Whitaker all have said that Marvin became the Hawks’ best perimeter defender this year. I guess none of them watch the games either, huh?

Idiot.

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
7:04 pm

Ken Strickland,

“Marvin has developed into an excellent defender and his DEF versatility is definitely an asset. If I had to determine the best defensive player, I’d chose AHorford. He’s more physical and a better on the ball defender than JSmith, or any other player on our team, and is our best defender when going up against bigger, taller and stronger players. He’s also our 2nd best shotblocker behind JSmith. That type of versatility makes him the best candidate for the teams best defensive player.”

Marvin is by no means an excellent defender. Not sure about Horford being the best but I can understand your point. I would say that if you moved Horford to his natural 4 position, he would not be a better defender at that position than Josh. Regarless of your like or dislike of Josh, to discredit his defensive ability for his career not one year is really disrespectful. He has been first or second on our team over the last 3 years in steals and 1st in blocks. Not Marvin. Not Al, Not Joe. I guess the stats don’t matter though huh. I know the response. He gets all his blocks off of help defense. I wonder who it is he is helping? I would guess that they were mostly wing guys and point guards penetrating. Who is checking those guys?

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
7:05 pm

Powe to the Cavs. No excuse if the Hawks don’t sign Joe Smith now.

Stating the Obvious

August 11th, 2009
7:09 pm

Well, Rod at least you’re not alone in your opinion of Marvin’s defense. You always have Sam and the other voices in your head to agree with you. Or do they disagree with you sometimes? I’ve always wondered about that with the schizos.

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
7:14 pm

Stating the Obvious,

Thanks for making my point for me dummy!!!!!!! I’m sure your brilliant head coach Woodson would be smart enough to put his best perimeter defenders on the other teams best player at the end of the game. Wonder why JJ forced him to Josh’s side? Hmmm…….. Wonder why our best perimeter defender Marvin was not guarding him? Ignorance is bliss.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
7:16 pm

KevinA

August 11th, 2009
7:18 pm

jhan, from the last post.

It would be crazy to give Crawford $15M/year but not JJ.

I’m all for giving our frontcourt more touches but we can’t run our offense through them.

Our established scorers are all backcourt players – like it or not.

I would not sign JJ this year for more than Josh gets. I think Josh will have a better year. If Crawford stays I would assume JJ is gone. If the back court continues to high volume attack I think you will see Woody gone. Time for change.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
7:19 pm

I know he’s defenetly a better player now than he was in that Video, but I wish he still attacked as quickly as he did back then. No doubt, that’s the Woodson Effect on him now….

Mystikal

August 11th, 2009
7:20 pm

If marvin really did work on his ball handling that would mean so much. Having 3 players on the floor at all time that can handle the ball really helps on offense. Combine that with getting the ball to Horford (hoping it happens) who is a great passer and the offense could be so much better. Like many have said though, we will see if Woodson has learned anything and actually makes the adjustments.

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
7:20 pm

Stating The Obvious,

“And Ray and Sautee and the guys on Peachtree Hoops and Lang Whitaker all have said that Marvin became the Hawks’ best perimeter defender this year. I guess none of them watch the games either, huh?”

Peachtree Hoops huh? I guess the Peachtree Hoops guys are the authorities huh. LOL How about asking someone in the league, or coaches. How about asking Woodson what he thinks?

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
7:25 pm

Great story by Sekou today on Al. Nice to see him picking up Dikembe and Smitty’s mantle of giving back.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
7:25 pm

nire, I wonder if someone told Marvin who to work with to improve his ball-handling.

Ken, stop spoon-feeding these men. They are not YMCA players, they are grown men.

Sautee, I fully admit this team has warts. But so does every other team. And I think that you are one of the few who probably can honestly say, that if we collectively spent as much time with any team (including Boston, Orlando, Denver, Cleveland, etc.) that we would likely find many, many, many frustrating problems with their coach and/or players. Remember all of those “Woody needs to hire an OC like Mike Brown” comments? And what happened in the Cavs-Orlando series? Cavs became a one-man gang with an offense that was easily defended and ultimately failed (Mo Williams is still walking around Cleveland looking for his jumper).

At best, folk can say that Woody missed on one talent (Diaw). So far, no one else who lived in his doghouse has returned to deliver the mythical “I told you so”. Folk admonish him for being a “control freak”, yet they turn around and say that he allows players the freedom to make mistakes. Huh? I’ve read Smith complemented for figuring out how to be the team’s 2nd leader scorer but then someone says that the team doesn’t look for him enough. Is this guy ready to score 25 points a game for a playoff team?

Here’s what I think. I think Woody treats these guys like grown men and expects them to step up like grown men. If Marvin works on his 3-point shooting, then guess what, he will have the freedom to spot up behind the 3-point line throughout the game. If Childress wants to probe the defense for openings on the baseline, go for it. If Flip (who had one of his very best seasons) wants to take his man to the rim, have fun abusing that opposing guard.

What he doesn’t do well is conduct “trial and error” studies during the game. I think he expects his assistants to coach the individual development and likely expects the players to push themselves in the off-season. I’m guessing that there was very little “player development” when WOody was playing. He’s old school. And I think players who have it together (like Horford) are rewarded and find their way in his system. Guys who need stroking (Salim & Diaw) probably dread every moment with Woody. I remember the quote when Bibby joined, something like “I’ll let him run it”. I remember the quote from Bibby’s agent a month ago “Woody allows Bibby to be a coach on the floor”. I remember his genuine delight when Bibby went off on him during the playoffs. Woody wants guys to step up and take it. But he won’t give it to them. He wants them to earn it. Like a man. No Babies Allowed. I always thought that Woody was an AWFUL hire for a young team. But take a look, we’re not that young anymore. 2 players on this team are still on their rookie contracts. Horford is mature being his years and we’ll see about Teague.

Lastly, if Woody clicked on each and every cylinder, I don’t think that we have enough cylinders to catch Boston, Orlando nor Cleveland. So I’m more apt to give him a pass when an i is left undotted because when all is said and done “we are who we are”… the best of the rest.

A Tribe Called Quest

August 11th, 2009
7:28 pm

WHY ARE WE LETTING EVERY BIG GO?

JOE SMITH ISN’T KEVIN GARNETT. WE CAN LOOK AT OTHER PLAYERS TOO. WHY COULDNT WE SIGN OBERTO?

JESUS

Traceman

August 11th, 2009
7:28 pm

Rod, Josh is a tremendous shotblocker but he is only average AT BEST as a man defender which is why despite his tremendous shotblocking ability, he gets very few votes for the All-Defense team. He can make spectacular plays OCCASIONALLY when guarding guys on the perimeter by blocking their shots from behind after they get by him but if you think that is great D you are mistaken. Both Marvin and JJ are FAR better at staying in front of their men on D than Smoove is.

When Smoove first came into the league, he was quick enough to guard SFs but in case you haven’t noticed, he has gained a significant amount of weight over the last two seasons. He is growing into a man and as he gets bigger and stronger, he is going to be even less successful trying to guard guys on the perimeter. Smoove is a PF who can play SOME SF but he would struggle to guard most good SFs for an entire game.

All that said, Smoove has a greater impact on the TEAM’S defensive success than any other player on the roster because of his shotblocking ability. He is NOT the team’s best MAN defender but he is the team’s MOST IMPORTANT defender.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
7:30 pm

nire, I was thinking that too. That the Hawks have a rich history of “guys who care”. We’ve had some jerks along the way but it feels like we’ve had some of the best character guys of any team in the league. I’m probably being a “homer” about that. SAR was a great community guy too. And JT. A bunch. And that’s way cool!

A Tribe Called Quest

August 11th, 2009
7:30 pm

WHY ARE ALL THE STARTERS EXCEPT BIBBY THE EXACT SAME HEIGHT IN THE PICTURE?

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
7:31 pm

STO,

Please don’t put words in my mouth. I have never stated that Marvin was our best perimeter defender, though I DID say he was the most improved on defense. His increased effort on D is what I praised him for.

IMHO, our two best perimeter defenders (by far) got traded to G.S. Not that they ever got to defend.

Odd that they played for a supposedly “defensive” coach and yet had lots of dnp-cds, eh?

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
7:34 pm

Tribe,

Lots of teams do that for team publicity photos – take angles and space people to make everyone look roughly the same height. That’s also why Bibby only looks 3-4 inches shorter instead of the 6-8 inches shorter that he actually is…

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
7:34 pm

ATCQ,

Is Jesus even available? He’d be a good signing! You KNOW he’s tough if he died on a cross.

Sorry Ramon, I couldn’t help myself. ;-)

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
7:36 pm

Notice how the angle of the photo is slightly tilted upward, Bibby is standing at least a couple feet in front of everyone, Josh is standing in front of Al, JJ is standing in front of Marvin, Marvin and Al both have wider stances than everyone else, etc.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
7:37 pm

Can you tell I took a photography class in college?

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
7:39 pm

Co-sign Traceman. Best description of Josh’s defensive impact that I’ve seen around here.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
7:40 pm

1) Mikki More Sucks

2) Stromile Swift Sucks

3) Al Horford has been the best defeder on this team since the day he got drafted. Joe is solid, and Josh has A LOT of work to do….his help defense is pretty solid though.

3) Koroloev, Carney, Siler and no one else….Maybe Flip or Gerald Green…you just never know

4) Joe Smith come home baby!!!!! WE NEED YOU!!!!!!

Rod, I never said Klezia INSTEAD of Marvin. I meant Kleazia BACKING UP Marvin. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better. Marvin is better.

Please everyone, Stop the Madness….

~This has been a NO BITCHASSNESS prduction~

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
7:41 pm

Somebody give nire a cookie ;-)

Ramon

August 11th, 2009
7:54 pm

I won’t lie to you guys. If I was Joe Smith, I would sign with Denver.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
7:55 pm

AJ, I agree. We’ve had some of the best charater guys in the leauge.

LMAO@ Sautee

Ramon, Exellent post from earlier

Rod, the Last time Josh had to Guard Vice Carter, he shot a Game Winning three right in his face….Josh couldn’t play vince tight bec ausehe dosent have the Lateral quickness to stay with smaller guys like that. If he had, Mr. Carter surely would have taken it to the rack.

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
8:02 pm

Traceman,

I totally disagree. I guess steals don’t mean anything either.

I think the stats will speak for themselves. No comparison.

Josh (5 seasons)
897 blocks and 441 steals

Marvin (4 seasons)
126 blocks 238 steals

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
8:05 pm

Being able to recover is part of being a good defensive player in football and basketball beleive it or not.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
8:06 pm

Ramon,

Nene, Birdman, Kenyon Martin, and Ronoldo Baklman….OK I see your point lol. BUT, The Nuggets won’t get past the Flakers. Also Denver has shown over the last two years that they want no part of the Luxury Tax, by Dumping Camby and Letting Klezia go overseas.

Besides, It’s Hotlanta!!! Joe will make the right decision ;-) If he had a Twitter account, Nire and I would have had him signed weeks ago hehehe!!!

Rod from College Park

August 11th, 2009
8:07 pm

Ariose,

Why was our best perimeter defender Marvin not checking him? Hmmmmm. Boy this Woodson must really not know what he is doing. LOL

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
8:10 pm

Rod, they play two different positions. There arent that may SF’s who are prolific shot-blockers. It’s usually big men…..like….OH YEAH JOSH SMITH!!!!

Marvin is not a Big…

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
8:12 pm

Rod, Probably because of the “out of bounds” play by the Nets and the scramble afterward. Josh just happend to be near vince so he had to defend him at that point.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
8:16 pm

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
8:20 pm

Marvin gets assigned to cover the inbounder a lot on those plays because 1) his length is bothersome and 2) he won’t take the risk of leaving his man. That’s the reason that Phil Jackson almost always had Pippen guard the inbounding player despite the fact that Pippen was the Bulls’ most versatile defender.

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
8:21 pm

Stating the Obvious that you don’t have cable, because obviously you couldn’t have watched or been to Phillips Arena to see that Marvin is an average defender compared to Josh. I just think you guys must be getting paid by Marvin to keep defending him. This guy is not that good and he is not worth $1 million a year let alone $7.5…..

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
8:28 pm

That clip shows a reason why Marvin gets assigned to the inbounder – he deflected the inbounds pass.

Here’s a clip of Reggie’s famous shot. I don’t think that Phil put Pippen on McKie and Harper on Reggie because he was more scared of Derek McKey than he was of Reggie or because he thought Ron Harper was a better defender than Pip…

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
8:28 pm

Samuel

August 11th, 2009
8:36 pm

AJ,

You’re On.
Let’s make no mistake about it. Josh Smith is our best defender when “he” wants to be. Hands down. He is the only player we got who can dominate the game from a defensive stand point.

I’m not one to base defensive ability solely on blocks but when Josh is zoned in on defense, there’s not a better defender in the league. Not only does he block shots but he has guys looking around to see where he’s at, which is very valuable and doesn’t show up in the box scores. Just ask KG and company from a couple of years ago.

Like what Shaq said about the TD comparison. TD may be better all around but he is “most dominate”. Josh falls into that category. I would say that JJ is our best all-around defender, followed by Al and marvin but Josh is definately most dominate.

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
8:39 pm

Niremetal, WTF does that have to do with anything. Jordan is on the best player, why? Because the NBA’s Jordan probably only had 2 fouls the whole game and had license to chop the sh#t out of somebody with no foul call at will. I don’t know what point you’re trying to prove, but if that’s our Atlanta team, that would be Joe or Josh chasing Reggie.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
8:41 pm

Nire, nice Clip!

Samuel

August 11th, 2009
8:44 pm

Nire,

I can’t totally agree with you on that. Pippen got all the pub for being the best defender but Ron Harper was probably the most underrated defensive player ever. Most people only got a chance to see Harper post-knee injury days.

I got to see him in his prime on a nightly basis when I lived in SoCal from 87-90. The man was a straight up beast. OMG the Clippers and the Lakers use to hang up something serious. Harper was the only man I have ever seen put “absolute locks” on Jordan. No Shi_. A defensive Beast.

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
8:44 pm

Now notice, who is on the best player on the floor? Joe, who ends up with the game winning block? I’ll let you answer that……

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLsHMb-tnNI

The Truth

August 11th, 2009
8:46 pm

As I read Sekou article entitled “Horford spends time teaching basketball to youth abroad”, I can’t help but notice how thin Al looks. Even in the above picture in this blog, Al is about equal in height to all four in the background (being just a bit taller then JJ) but with a thinner frame than all four players. Even JJ looks thicker then Al. I know BK would be proud to know his design of all 6-8/6-9 players is still in place and hailed as the core future. If Al expects to regularly dance with the likes of Shaq, Howard other Bigs, he better hit the weight room fast for conditioning. I don’t know what his weight is these days but he will be injury prone if he doesn’t get stronger. When we subconsciously scream for more bigs, this is the reason why.

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
8:48 pm

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE, WATCH JOSH RUN PAST MARVIN FOR THE BLOCK…….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygZBFbVqtxg&feature=related

Hoops

August 11th, 2009
8:57 pm

Ramon,

Joe Smith will sign with ATL now that the Cavs have signed Powe. I don’t blame him for holding out to see if he could return to the Cavs. What does Denver have to offer that the Hawks don’t?

It’s just my opinion, but I think Joe S. will sign with the Hawks soon! Why not? The Hawks are a playoff team on the way up! Then we will wait until training camp to fill out the rest of the roster.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
8:59 pm

Samuel, I always thought about the Harper to Jordan relationship like Marques Johnson to Dr. J. You have to be old school to understand that. But both Harper and Marques were a half-a-hair below their more publicized contemporary. At least until injuries set in. Kind of like Donny Hathaway to Marvin Gaye.

rusty

August 11th, 2009
9:03 pm

i didnt think that the hawks have a really good defensive player certainly not marvin or joe. we are
a lousy defensive with woodys lousy switching defense. i just hope to hell that woodson makes joe
to stop ball hogging & gets some ball movement in
our offense. i still think that we need to make a trade of joe for a big man. crawford is here. does any one here think alook these lines

Mike

August 11th, 2009
9:14 pm

We should not have to worry about Denver going after Joe Smith. They are trying to re-sign Anthony Carter and sign a wing player to replace Kleiza and Dantay Jones…rumor is possibly Wally Szerbiak.
Hopefully Joe realizes he will have a very good situation in the ATL

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
9:20 pm

Rusty, no we don’t need to trade Joe. The only big that is worthy of a Joe trade is Dwight Howard and Orlando is not doing that.

Hoops

August 11th, 2009
9:20 pm

Real GM is reporting that the Hawks are showing interest in and have had preliminary talks with Jason Hart.

Some of you guys have been calling for a pass first backup PG, well here he is!

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
9:23 pm

Sam,

Uh…Jordan was assigned to cover Best. Harper had Reggie. Jordan only switched onto Reggie after Harper got caught behind a screen. Watch the clip and/or listen to Costas’s play-by-play.

My point was simply that Marvin was assigned to cover the inbounder because that was the most sensible assignment for a guy who is long, fundamentally sound, and not prone to taking big risks.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
9:38 pm

And as far as being assigned the big-time players, it depends on the matchup. I think Marvin and JJ have comparable talent as perimeter defenders, but JJ is a little quicker and Marvin is a little longer. When Marvin was healthy, Woody had him cover LeBron, Melo, and Pierce this year. JJ covered Vince and Wade.

Inbounds plays at the end of games are different situations, but the same principles apply – you do it generally based on matchups, but there’s the added twist of needing someone to cover the inbounder. The traditional NBA logic on that has always been “put someone who is long and smart on the inbounder so that they can anticipate and try to deflect the pass.”

The NBA is too fluid a league to say who is our best “defender” overall. Generally, there is post defense, perimeter defense, help defense, and transition defense. Horford is our best post defender (by far). Josh is our best help and transition defender. Marvin and JJ are our best perimeter defenders against swingmen. Acie and Speedy were our best perimeter defenders against PGs, a point that Sautee aptly made. Now, I don’t know who the hell takes that mantle (Teague? Bibby? Crawford? Not that it matters, because Woody never played Acie or Speedy anyway…). But there’s no single answer to who the “best defender” is overall. The game can’t be boiled down like that.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
9:45 pm

And PS – if I were forced to choose a single “best defender” on the team, it wouldn’t be Josh, Joe, or Marvin. It would be Horford. He plays excellent post D, great help D, great transition D, and actually plays solid perimeter D. Unlike Josh, Horford plays off a couple feet and never goes for the steal when he switches onto someone quicker than him, which allows him to stay in front for longer. Anyone remember the game against Boston where Horford switched onto Pierce off the inbound play and forced him into that tough fadeaway jumper (which Pierce somehow hit)? Pierce got on Sportscenter, but Horford played that perfectly.

ILL-logical

August 11th, 2009
9:48 pm

Samuel, I always thought about the Harper to Jordan relationship like Marques Johnson to Dr. J. You have to be old school to understand that. But both Harper and Marques were a half-a-hair below their more publicized contemporary. At least until injuries set in. Kind of like Donny Hathaway to Marvin Gaye.

Whoa!!! Great and vivid illustrations,especially the Donny and Marvin piece.

Sekou Smith

August 11th, 2009
10:00 pm

Man, I love this place. You cats are like my wife, you can turn anything into an argument. :)

I am partial to this picture, mostly because I think it looks cool and because my man Pouya shot it. But it does illustrate the similarities in size of the four guys behind Bibby. I’ve debated with some of everyone about who is tallest. There isn’t much difference in height between Josh, Al and Marvin. Joe is slightly shorter than all three, but he’s much thicker across his torso than any of them. Josh might be a hair taller than Al and Marvin, depending how all three are standing. But it doesn’t make much difference.

Steamboat is right, Chad Bumphis is a flash. Watched his highlights online last fall. And I know I’m in SEC country but I’m a Wolverine for life, this one and any others that might come my way.

As stated many times before, I share the concerns everyone has about the big man depth. And it would be nice to see a couple of veteran additions here soon.

Mystikal

August 11th, 2009
10:01 pm

Already thinking next summer try to make a trade for Washington’s Javale Mcgee or Marcin Gortat from Orlando. Know it is not likely (and just odd) to be trying to trade with teams in your division, but centers are scarce. Just my thoughts..

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
10:01 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf9h–ihrg8&NR=1

If smoove could shoot like this all the time, we’d be the best team in the leauge.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
10:03 pm

AJ,

Man, how can you put Donny Hathaway in the same BLOG as Marvin Gaye?

Much less the same sentence.

Maybe a better comparison would be Solomon Burke or Joe Tex to Otis Redding.

What’s that? oh this is a Hawks blog? My mistake.

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
10:03 pm

Niremetal, I would agree with Horford. My opinion is Marvin is not our best perimeter defender, can we agree on that? Only reason I say this is because somebody on here said that nonsense. I like our team, but we need a couple of big guys and I thought Marvin would be the piece we could have traded for a big but I just don’t think nobody else wanted him.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
10:04 pm

Sekou, Why argue when we can just be Fans!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAMchZk1MC0

;-)

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
10:05 pm

I think I may need to alter some of my Fav Five females hehehe….

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
10:08 pm

Sautee, don’t dis the applejack hat. Donny was a BAD, BAD man.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
10:10 pm

Sam,

BYC rules and the fact that no teams were playing with any real cap room made it virtually impossible to sign-and-trade Marvin, same as it made it impossible to sign-and-trade Josh and Josh last summer.

As far as who our best perimeter defender is…I don’t know. It depends on the matchup. Against Wade or Kobe, I want JJ. Against Melo or LeBron, I want Marvin. Against Devin Harris and Chris Paul, there’s no good option, but I’d probably want Jeff Teague. Basketball isn’t a simple game. There aren’t simple answers.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
10:10 pm

Sam from da swats,

$1M is all you’d pay for 14 and 6 from a 4th option?

Oops, there goes the old credibility. I know you’re down on Marvin, but if you can’t keep it real….. well let’s just say you are telling me to keep on scrollin’

And just when I was thinking you might have something worthwhile to say.

Oh well, c’est la vie

Doug

August 11th, 2009
10:13 pm

Rod from Sam or wherever: Are you the guy that played D-II basketball???? Did you learn nothing during that sojourn?? I was the poor sap that stated that Marvin is the Hawks best PERIMETER defender…because…well he is. Josh …as shown by your stats is the Hawks best help defender…i.e. off ball…very average guarding quick drivers man up. You must not like Marvin or whatever…I have no agenda…just watch and observe…JJ could be the best defender but absorbs so much heavy lifting at the other end there is not a whole lot of genuine passion for the other end! Watch a game this year…rather than boning up on the fantasy stats and see who actually guards…majority of the time an opponents best perimeter scorer (unless it is a 1).

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
10:13 pm

You’re right, but I’d rather want Josh on Lebron or Melo. If you notice, Melo never has big games against us because Josh plays him well. As long as Woody lets Teague do his thing, we’ll be ok.

Anakin Joe

August 11th, 2009
10:14 pm

Ariose, I will most definitely be placing a little something extra in the offering plate this Sunday. I MUST GIVE THANKS!

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
10:18 pm

Sautee,

Its just a little sarcasm. I just don’t see him being that good of a player. I believe he has reached his ceiling and that’s what he will give us, 15 points 6 rebounds.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
10:21 pm

Actually, Marvin was assigned to both Melo and LeBron in February. And he played very, very good defense against them both. From his rookie year until this year, I’d agree that I’d have rather had Josh on either of them. But Marvin stepped it up this year before he got hurt. But hey, I can live with someone disagreeing with me. Like Sautee said – just keep it real.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
10:24 pm

AJ,

Yeah Donny was great but Marvin…….well let’s just say that Marvin and Otis (with a goodly dose of JB) changed one little white boys’ life.

Me and Dan Penn and Spooner Oldham and a host of white boys who loved soul music. I was never the same even when the Beatles hit.

niremetal

August 11th, 2009
10:25 pm

Gimme Sam Cooke.

Sautee

August 11th, 2009
10:27 pm

Sam,

Thanks for admitting the hype.

If time tells a different ceiling will you come back and man up?

rusty

August 11th, 2009
10:31 pm

joe doesnt have the quickness or desire to be
a good defensive player. i sure would like to have bosh for jj, anyone but a hawk fan would agree. ask
mr.charles b.

J.J.M.

August 11th, 2009
10:52 pm

alot of people forgettin about mo evans

Sam from da Swats

August 11th, 2009
10:57 pm

Sautee,

I hope I have to because that would mean our team would be unstoppable.

Mystikal

August 11th, 2009
10:59 pm

HEY SEKOU,

So we have Siler coming to camp. We are hopeful that we can get Joe Smith locked up soon. Any other noons about how we’re looking to sure up the roster? We also need a back-up small forward. U know if they are looking at any training camp guys, maybe Hunter or Korolev?

Good thing football is abou to start up, cause it’s 3 months til basketball starts and can’t go on like this waiting for updates all the time. Go Hawks!!

Ken Strickland

August 11th, 2009
11:32 pm

ROD-since we play a continuously switching DEF, there’s no way you can single out one of our players and say he has or hasn’t defended any particular player. The only player that consistently ends up playing his man one on one is Horford. When the ball goes into the post there’s no switching.

You know, it’s amusing to see people making an issue of Marvin’s DEF ability, or the perceived lack their of, along with JJ, Smoove and Horford, but there hasn’t been a single mention of MBibby’s DEF shortcomings. Bottomline, whether Marvin mesures up to anyones DEF standards or not, his DEF definitely doesn’t hurt the team.

Ariose

August 11th, 2009
11:33 pm

AJ, Amen to that!!!

J.J.M., Mo is solid….but not great…Just OK…but I like him….But i’d roll with Kleiza first lol.

Nire, I agree, but of course josh is is needed to protect the rim so he can’t guard them full-time. But Marvin has really gotten better. Hopefully, he’ll come back with a really nice handle. But it defenely depends on the matchups like you said.

Melvin

August 11th, 2009
11:49 pm

Ariose,

Richgirl is the 20 century En Vogue… wiggle, wiggle, wiggle….

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
12:32 am

Rufus1

August 12th, 2009
12:34 am

Marvin Haters.

How many players can average 14 and 6 without having a single play run for them…While having to guard teams best perimeter player. I bet they all make or will make atleast 7.5 mil a year.

Marvin is like a great tightend, who can catch and run block. All that he does may not show up in highlights or stats but is very important. Marvin does exactly what he is ask to do every night. If he is asked to rebound, he will grab 14. If he is asked to guard lebron or Pierce, he will. If he is ask to score, he will drop 25-30. His role changes every night depending on the opponent and the health of our players. He is our utility man..he is our Battier, But 6 years younger. You will never understand his value in 30 sec tv highlights.

Similar players who around 7.5 mil
Pietris orlando
Prince Detroit
Battier Houston
Ariza Houston…Ariza averaged 9pts a game
Butler Washington

HawksNeedaBig

August 12th, 2009
12:37 am

Can I ask a question of all you Woody lovers? Why does a coach with a team full of undersized guys with young legs insist on playing half-court Iso’s for most of the game? Why doesn’t he let them run?

All the best Josh (and Flip and Al) highlights are when the Hawks are pushing the pace. Yet too often we saw this: Bibby walks the ball up and hands it off to Joe, then disappears; Josh goes out to about the 3-point line and doesn’t move; Joe gets doubled, and someone is forced to toss up a desperation shot before the clock expires. If we were lucky, Joe found Bibby for a 3 or Al got a rebound.

The halfcourt game is not where it’s at with a young fast team, esp. one too small to match up w/ the bigger Celtics, Cavs, Magic, etc. You need to let these men RUN!! And Woody is not the man to do that.

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
1:38 am

Sekou


The next time you get into an argument about which player you mentioned in the above picture is the tallest, then here is the answer:

Johnson, Joe, height =79, wingspan =119.5, Pseudo-Reach=119.5
Smith, Josh, height =81, wingspan =84, Pseudo-Reach=123
Horford, Al, height =82, wingspan =84.75, Pseudo-Reach=124.375
Williams, Marvin, height =81, wingspan =87.5, Pseudo-Reach=124.75

AND THE WINNING IS MARVIN WILLIAMS!!!

A Tribe Called Quest

August 12th, 2009
1:56 am

WHY ARE WE LETTING EVERYONE GET BY? OBERTO?

WE WONT SIGN JOE SMITH UNTIL HE FINDS ANOTHER TEAM. NICE STRATEGY. WE HAVE 6 MILLION TO FREAKING SPEND. FREAKING GO INTO THE LUXURY TAX IF U MUST

A Tribe Called Quest

August 12th, 2009
1:58 am

These blogs are so anemic that Sekou talks about Randolph Morris being a factor.

Randolph Morris — the same player with that miserable work ethic

dmortone

August 12th, 2009
1:59 am

Glad the Leon Powe to Cleveland thing happened, now maybe Joe Smith will finally get on board and we can have about as good of a summer as we can reasonably expect.

Btw, does anyone know where I can find old Hawks games, either through torrents or purchase? Specifically, I want to see the game Marvin dominated when we played the Bobcats, but any Hawks games not currently on iTunes will be perfectly fine with me.

chemdawg

August 12th, 2009
2:00 am

The Truth: I would say another confounding variable in your statistical analysis is who they’re on the floor with at any given time (since only 1 person can get credit for the rebound). Ideally, you should compare wingspan vs average wingspan of their teammates and opposing team to determine what percentage of rebounds they grab. Your method punishes tall players who play with other tall players.

niremetal

August 12th, 2009
2:29 am

Tribe,

Calm down. The Hawks only need to sign one guy. If they get Joe Smith, we’re good for the summer. You always come here and post rants about the Hawks didn’t sign the most recent random big man to come off the market, usually going to a team that offers more minutes (Oberto will either start or be the first big man off the bench in Washington) and/or a better shot at a title (Powe in Cleveland). If the Hawks strike out on Smith, I’ll be upset. But we’re talking about the 10th man – second big man off the bench. As long as they get SOMEone to fill that hole, mission accomplished.

If Joe Smith goes elsewhere, I’ll gripe. But until then, there’s not point in looking to every big man that comes off the market.

blue hawk

August 12th, 2009
5:40 am

sorry guys but i think we will have just a seven guy rotation this year, according to mike woodson’s brain…

PG – Mike, Jamal, Joe
SG – Joe, Jamal, Marvin, Josh
SF – Marvin, Joe, Josh
PF – Josh, Al, Zaza, Marvin
C – Al, Zaza

everybody else will get acie law minutes. hahahaha

blue hawk

August 12th, 2009
5:49 am

HawksNeedaBig,

i second the motion.

don’t waste those young legs. don’t waste those run-the-floor bigmen. don’t waste the speedy guards and wingmen.

bring the running game on.

can we change the coach already?

can we get someone who actually has a brain and sees the obvious.

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
8:22 am

For all the celebration about the increased likelihood that Joe Smith will sign with the Hawks. Please, don’t dance in the streets just yet:

Roster not set: Signing Powe would bring the Cavs roster to 13 players and they are not done. Despite having six big men on the roster already, Powe’s injury and J.J. Hickson’s recovery from a back injury still may leave the team short.

So, according to a league source, the Cavs are still considering signing Joe Smith or perhaps Rob Kurz. The team is expected to sign second-round draft pick Danny Green, a wing player, before training camp as well.

Source: hoopshype.com

Sekou Smith

August 12th, 2009
8:43 am

Rob Kurz isn’t a bad player, by the way. Saw him last year and was surprised at how good he was, because I barely remembered him from his college days. Hawks need players like that to fill out the roster.

Rather have Flip than J. Hart, based mostly on his experience with this team. Not sure where Hart would fit into this mix other than insurance at a spot that already has an expensive policy at that position in J. Crawford (who can swing to the point if, knock on wood, something were to happen to both Bibby and Teague).

dap01

August 12th, 2009
8:48 am

SEKOU:

Marvin worked on his ball handling skills this summer. What are the others working on individually?

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
9:04 am

Nice article Sekou. Again, I feel like many of my fellow bloggers and fans have lost sight of how dramatic a change is occurring in Hawksville. This is honestly, the first off season in a long time where we have been run like a professional orginization. Making sound commitments to our core group and positioning this team to be a serious player for the next several years. These moves represent a seismic shift in the way the Hawks have been run. The resigning of Bibby and Za without a lot of hubbub and to favorable numbers is honestly staggering to this Hawks fan. Like every one else I want Joe Smith in here, but I honestly feel a lot better with the way Sund has been conducting business.

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
9:07 am

Also, I really don’t think Boston or Clevland are going to be as good as everyone seems to think. I have NO faith in the Shaq move, which could also disrupt chemistry. Boston’s addition of Sheed is nice, but KG’s injury is being extremely overlooked. A guy his age with his mileage does not bounce back easily from knee surgery and they have handcuffed their salaries for the next 3 years. Plus, Ray and Paul are another year older. I feel that we are closer to the top three than 5-8 in the standings.

vava74

August 12th, 2009
9:11 am

Rod from College Park,

Bowen and Battier were/are considered a couple of the best perimeter defenders in the league and their blocks and steal stats are very weak.

Steals are mostly accomplished by poaching the passing lanes, which does not mean that you are a good one on one defender.

Blocks are mostly accomplished on help defense (team defense/rotations) rather than on one on one situations.

Look at Iverson: many steals, no defense.
Look at Camby: many blocks, very little man to man defense (have you even seen him shut down other centers??).

Josh is similar in both categories to the above examples: although I do believe that he has the potential to be a very good defensive player, his actual man to man defense is suspect, to say the least.

Another important factor to determine a PF’s defensive hability is his defensive rebounding. Josh is a poor defensive rebounder, mostly due to lack of commitment and because he privileges looking for spectacular blocks rather than use his incredible leaping hability to snatch rebounds.

I’ll give you a very simple example: in the Hawks/Cavs series, Josh managed to make Varejão look like an offensively gifted player in at least a couple of games… on clear cut one on one situations he was repeatedly beaten. Just look at the games again or look for Varejão highlights from last season… you are bound to find him scoring against Josh.

If that does not evidenciate that he is not a good overall defensive player than we should not even lose our time trying to convince you.

Hawks Fan

August 12th, 2009
9:37 am

Why should the Hawks rush to give Joe Johnson a 4 year extension worth 64 million. He is a good player and probably the Hawks best player but as he has clashed with some of the younger players about their roles on the team and his lack of ability to be a Lebron James or Dewayne Wade the Hawks need not rush this decision. Mike Woodson has given Joe Johnson total control over the Hawks play so wouldn’t you think Joe Johnson is only going to sign an extension if he believes Mike Woodson will get one also. Mike Woodson can’t hide anymore under the shadows of the Hawks being young and inexperienced. The clash with alot of his players and no team identity should get noticed. Mike Woodson it is time to step up your game or get out of the way!

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
9:40 am

Sekou

I would say this about Rob Kurz, he might be an upgrade from Mo Evans at SF. So, if the Cavs pass on him, then maybe we should consider. There is more then one way to skin this cat.

macaroni tony

August 12th, 2009
9:51 am

Jason Hart is receiving interest from the Philadelphia 76ers, Atlanta Hawks, and Denver Nuggets. Hart’s agent, Bill Neff, told RealGM’s Alex Kennedy that each team has had preliminary talks regarding Hart. RealGM

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
9:57 am

Loren Woods & Jason Hart?, sorry still struggling with those 2 names. Amazing to see Solo, Shelden and one-legged Powe get contracts before we get a back-up forward. Just when I think Mikki Moore would be a horrific choice, Loren Woods’ name is mentioned. Geez.

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
9:59 am

Sekou

PS: I’ve already stated my position on Flip. I think the decision makers are making the selection of the 3rd PG way more difficult then it need to be. Just as Joe Smith is keeping the Hawks at bay while he explores other options so are the Hawks keeping Flip at bay while they explore other options. Eventually, something got to give because both parties are running at time.

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
10:11 am

The Truth- they actually have plenty of time

Traceman

August 12th, 2009
10:16 am

Rod, Vava74 said it perfectly with regard to the fact that a high number of blocks and steals don’t mean that a guy is a good perimeter defender.

O'Brien

August 12th, 2009
10:25 am

Sekou, 2 questions for you.

1) If Flip is signed, do you think that he will take away minutes from Teague? (like Flip took minutes away from Acie last year).

2) What is the holdup with Joe Smith? Does he not like our offer, or is he just keeping his options open?

I know that he would be the 2nd big man off the bench, but he still has some skills, and he could help Josh with his game. (I think Ty Hill needs all the help he can get).

Doug

August 12th, 2009
10:43 am

For the 100th time…Flip will not nor should he be signed. Sund drafted Teague for a reason…he is extremely highly thought of by everyone…including Woody. This is a huge difference from Acie. Along with the signing of Crawford, Teague makes Flip not only unnecessary but redundant. If someone like Hart is signed it will be to be 3rd PG…don’t even think that will happen, but Flip won’t be signed.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
10:52 am

Vava74 and Traceman,

“Bowen and Battier were/are considered a couple of the best perimeter defenders in the league and their blocks and steal stats are very weak.”

No comparison. These guys have Duncan and Yao behind them. You can play much better defense with a defensive force in the middle. The Hawks back inn the day would funnel everything to Dikembe. These guys funnel everything to Yao and Duncun.

“Another important factor to determine a PF’s defensive hability is his defensive rebounding. Josh is a poor defensive rebounder, mostly due to lack of commitment and because he privileges looking for spectacular blocks rather than use his incredible leaping hability to snatch rebounds.”

Totally untrue. It depends on the system. Dominique was considered not to be a good rebounder, but he was not asked to rebound on the old Hawks teams. When the ball was in the air, he was told to get out on the break. Since you guys keep talking about his perimeter defense, what power forwards in the league run right by Josh? He does play power forward right? Can Marvin check any power forward in the league? Camby was voted first team all defense, but I guess that does not matter huh. He is a terrible man to man defender. Ok!!!!! You don’t build those kind of numbers over a five year period being a terrible defender in any way. If that was the case, everyone would be able to do it.

Mike is back

August 12th, 2009
10:54 am

Daniel, ditto on your 9:04 am post. We are witnessing a metamorphosis of the Hawks Franchise. I like everyone else have been adamant about the need to acquire a dominate Big so we can challenge THE BIG DOGS…but I would be remiss if I over look the forward process this organization made this off-season…these are very reasonable contract for young long athletic guys.

The addition of a battle tested guy like Joe Smith shouldn’t be over looked if it happens…the intangibles he possess will be of great use to our young Bigs…plus he’s a shot blocker…Sund will have upgraded the team and still kept our CORE intact. I think it was a good investment for the TEAM and the FANS.

As a long-suffering ATL sports fan…I’m use to seeing star athletes come and go…this however is different…first it was the Birds…now it’s the Hawks putting the ATL back on the map…U GOTTA LOVE IT.

GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
10:57 am

Daniel

NBA training camps will open towards the end of September around September 29th or 30th; if you consider that a lot of time, then maybe. However, since the early birds have already gotten the worms, we are now talking about the availability of par player at best with only a few exceptions. So, I would think of setting an earlier pseudo-deadline just to motivate the process. If we don’t, we might lose negotiation leverage if we are perceived to be in a desperation mode which could happen.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
11:23 am

Daaaayyum! I KNOW y’all have heard about the Rick Pittino thing already this morning lol. WOW. What a crappy position to be in. Thrn he has to eventually address the media…..oooohhh weee!!!

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
11:35 am

Heh….why is there such a big deal being made about the marginal difference in height amongst the members of our starting backcourt? Is this something new?

Anybody ever hear of a guy named Billy Knight?

Ramon ,

Your 6:02 p.m. post from yesterday. Bravo ….

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
11:37 am

Ariose,

Ol’ Rick is admitting to something that many of these guys have done. It’s just a matter of getting caught, lol! Maybe he should call Kobe or Marv Albert about this one…. :twisted:

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
11:44 am

Ray, Yeah lol. It looks like the Louisvillle prez is beheind him so, it should blow over real quick. But he should Get some Kobe(Gold Digger protection program)Insurance just to be on the safe side hehehe….

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
11:52 am

Ariose, while his primary job is head coach, Pitino also gets a big chunk of money from public speaking and motivational books. Oops, that revenue source has all but ended. He should feel very fortunate that his price for infidelity is considerably less than what Steve McNair paid. Unfortunately, these guys never seem to learn. They need to stick with their wives and Wiggle, Wiggle, Wiggle videos to get them through the night.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
11:55 am

By the way, were there any lyrics to that song? All I can remember (lyrically) is wiggle, wiggle, wiggle. But then again, the point of the video had absolutely nothing to do with lyrics, did it? Never mind.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
12:03 pm

Big Ray,

Some people here seem to think that Joe is not big enough to play the three on a consistent basis. That’s why.

Stating the Obvious

August 12th, 2009
12:10 pm

Rod,

Your last post is so wrong that I don’t know where to begin. You think all that Bowen and Battier do is funnel people to Duncan and Yao?? I guess that’s why Bryant takes about 10 off-balance pull-up jumpers every time he plays the rockets and Spurs, right? Because of Yao and Duncan. Ok. Idiot.

And Marcus Camby can’t check any center man-to-man. That’s why the Nuggets defense IMPROVED last year after they traded him. Idiot.

Stating the Obvious

August 12th, 2009
12:14 pm

It was never more OBVIOUS than in your last post that you never actually watch NBA games.

Sekou Smith

August 12th, 2009
12:15 pm

I don’t think Flip will come back here, O’Brien, so it doesn’t matter what I think about he and Teague. And the hold up with Joe Smith is the same thing it almost always is in these things … player’s camp goes high, teams goes low and they’re trying to find the middle.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
12:24 pm

AJ, LMFAO!!!! eah Pitino would’ve been just fine with a lil “Wiggle,Wiggle,Wiggle” video in his life from time to time. No need to get all caught up and pay Court fees and whatnot hehehe….

The Lyics to the Song? Hmmm…..My memory is a little bit vauge there too. I think I need a refresher, so i’ll have to watch the video a few more times and get back to you :twisted:

;-)

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
12:32 pm

Rod,

At 6′7″ and 230 chiseled pounds, I’d say Joe is big enough to play the 3. More importantly, he’s strong enough. I think the question is whether there is an advantage for him at that position, and the answer is that there isn’t enough of one against enough opponents to play him there. I always saw Joe as a 3 or a big 2 that has nearly the skills of a 1 when it comes to ball-handling (he doesn’t have the natural passing skills of a 1, if you ask me).

The idea is to play a guy where he can take the most advantage of what he has, especially if you have somebody next to him that can play one of the positions he’s capable of playing, but can’t maximize himself in. Because of his size and his ball-handling capability, Joe is best used as a 2. While most 3s won’t match his ball-handling, there are enough of them that are big enough to give him problems.

I have no problems with playing Joe at the 3 in the right situations. All or even most of a game isn’t the right situation in most cases, in my opinion. If there is a team we can successfully play small ball against all night, then I’m all for it. But that won’t be very many nights, and I don’t see it being most of the season, either. Fit is everything.

Marvin is adequate enough at the 3, so we can afford to let Joe take advantage of playing at the 2. Most 2s can’t guard him well.

But that’s just my opinion. That, and we need Marvin in at the 3, at least as long as we’re running the frontcourt we currently have. I don’t see a big center of starting caliber anywhere in our immediate future. So we’re better served with a trio of 6′9″ guys with length, than we are with two 6′9″ guys and a guard who’s capable of playing small forward.

Again, just my opinion. Sure, JJ can play the 3. But is that really the best fit for us, all season long?

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
12:34 pm

Sekou- Have you heard anything about how the Powe signing is affecting the Joe Smith situation? The obvious thinking (from a Hawks fan) is that Clevland would no longer be interested and should put us in the driver’s seat. What do you think?

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
12:36 pm

Truth- I would classify that as plenty of time. I hear your points. I just don’t think the Hawks want to be bidding against themselves. Especially if Joe Smith’s options are drying up.(see above)

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
12:38 pm

Oh, and Sekou, since you have inside info that the Hawks are going hard after Joe Smith and we resigned Marvin and are looking to extend JJ, do you throw that in Mark Bradley’s face? Since he was declaring that the Hawks were done after signing Za.

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
12:38 pm

If not you should!

doc

August 12th, 2009
12:55 pm

donny, marvin, otis or al green and LOU RAWLS, among others and i smoothed it through my early life. i couldnt have made it any other way. that music is what is missing in life today and among our children. heh heh … dont compare em just enjoy what they brought. donny and roberta, quite an album for lovin which it is what it is all about. agree with sekou, even here with the dissin that goes on, i know rod and ray have a grooove goin on.

doc

August 12th, 2009
12:59 pm

me, my 8 track, squeeky old cadillac, a lady and lou rawls is all i needed when i was 17.

Ken Strickland

August 12th, 2009
1:06 pm

I see the Hawks improving on last yrs win total and playoff accomplishments, barring serious injuries of course, due to the improvement we’ll see from Marvin, Josh and Horford. The additions of Crawford and Teague, and Woodson’s acceptance of both, will add speed and quickness to the team, as well as OFF and DEF improvement.

Now, if I’m completely wrong and we don’t measure up to last yrs accomplishments, for some of us, the consulation prize will be the firing of HC Mike Woodson, which ain’t bad.

Hoops

August 12th, 2009
1:14 pm

O’Brien & Daniel,

Looking @ the Hawks roster @ this point and trying to figure out the direction Sund is going in is kind of a struggle.

I believe Sund wants to sign Joe Smith for 1 year and not 2 because of JJ’s extension and the cap possibily being lower next year. If he can’t get Joe S. to sign for 1 year, then he will probably just go with Hunter as Smooth’s back up. I think Siler and Korolev have a really good chance of making the roster this year. Beyond that, I’m not sure if he will sign more than 13 players. Regardless of whether Sund gets Joe S. or not, I see Marvin playing some minutes @ PF when Crawford and JJ are @ SG and SF. Add Bibby to that line up and you have 4 really good perimeter shooters on the floor. It will be hard for the defense to double JJ then!

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
1:18 pm

Big Ray,

Agreed, but I feel like Joe is a mismatch at either position. It’s not like we actually post him up against smaller 2’s, so he will take advantage of most 2’s or threes in the league. He will beat the 3’s with quickness. I feel like the Hawks would be a more dangerous offensive team with Bibby, Jamal and Joe in the frontcout together. It would prevent the double and triple teaming of Joe, and keep us from going into those long offensive lulls that we say in the playoffs. Just my opinion.

Stating the Obvious,

“And Marcus Camby can’t check any center man-to-man. That’s why the Nuggets defense IMPROVED last year after they traded him. Idiot.”

I think they actually improved because not having Camby in the middle forced other players to play honest and not rely on Camby to bail them out when they got beat. Same thing applies to the on offense after the got rid of Iverson. they went from the ISO Iverson to having more ball movement, and look what happened. It’s called the team concept and not the I concept. It is OBVIOUS that you have never suited up if you think that having a guy like Camby, Yao or Duncan behind you will not help you defensively. Again, Camby was voted 1st team all defense in 07-08 along with guess who, Duncan and Bowen. I don’t think you would be voted to the first team, not being able to defend your position. IDOIT.

niremetal

August 12th, 2009
1:33 pm

Sekou,

Drop Brian Skinner’s name the next time you talk to Sund or Pendergraft ;)

gwite

August 12th, 2009
1:40 pm

“I-DO IT”

o…K.

doc

August 12th, 2009
1:40 pm

i knew it! rod, replied “agreed” to ray comments. durn things change just by bringing soul music into the equation. change the durn world.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
1:45 pm

doc, good stuff man. I could tell that you’ve got plenty of “playa” in you.

I agree with Ray about Joe. I suspect that he will see a fair amount of time at 3 just because the small line-up works well for us at certain points in the game and Crawford will likely receive more playing time than Flip. And as Sekou hinted at earlier, Crawford should be the 3rd option at PG, not the 2nd. So that kind of forces Joe to the 3. When Joe and Crawford are on the floor together, it would be good to have someone who can get in the lane with ease. Most opposing teams will not want to play both Joe and Jamal one-on-one and obviously, a big would not be the ideal guy to go and double one of them. So if the opposing PG is trying to cheat, someone like Teague should be able to use his quicks to ATTACK THE RIM. Even Bibby’s lightening quick release would work well in that scenario, but I’m on record as preferring anything that involves ATTACKING THE RIM.

AfroMan, come back. Sorry, just felt the need to cry out for Childress (again), the only guy who consistently attacked the rim. Boo-hoo-hoo… AfroMan come back. Boo-hoo-hoo.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
1:47 pm

Loren Woods? Sekou, next time you talk to Sund slap him. Or suggest Charles Shackleford, anyone but F’ing Loren Woods.

jhan

August 12th, 2009
2:03 pm

Rod – I can’t seem to figure you out. You look at players individual stats to shoot them down, but when you’re arguments are proven wrong you throw out the “team” concept. Seems like you want it both ways.

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
2:07 pm

Rod,

I think the most important thing at this point is realizing that we have these options now, and to exploit them when the opportunities present themselves, while not sticking with certain lineups when they don’t work. Woody and his staff need to brainstorm on this, and get together with the veteran players (which is the entire backcourt with exception of Teague) first, and make this happen as a complete unit.

I see great opportunities for a versatile and dangerous team, and a chance at some serious chemistry.

Astro Joe,

What?? Loren Woods? Who said that? If that’s what Sund is after, then I’m right in the slap-happy line with you. Save some slaps for me! I didn’t know you were from the Slapabro tribe. Me too! :evil:

By the way, you need to go with the “ATTACK THE RIM” tag line. I’m tellin’ you…you gotta rock that before Clyde steals the rights and tries to make a t-shirt out of it. Hell, sell the idea to the ASG as a replacement/upgrade to the “Highlight Factory” and you might make some dough on the back end. Fa Real!

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
2:08 pm

Doc,

Save the world with soul? Sounds like another good tag line. Man, you guys are off the chain today!

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
2:15 pm

Ray and AJ, Great points. Joe Cannot play there full-time. In my eyes Marv is the perfect example of your avg. prototypical SF. Along with guys like LeBron and Melo of course. I’m speaking strictly from a size point of view.

Ken Strick, Or would could bring back Flip mid-season(if he’s available) if things get ugly.

…..OK, who the heck is Jason Heart? The name sounds familiar but i’ve never seen or really heard of a guard by that name. I know theres a big man naed Jason that plays for the Sixers…he’s the only player that comes to mind.

Rod, I think you meant frontcourt lol.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
2:24 pm

…..Flip consistantly atacked the rim….*Kicks Rocks* shoo…

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
2:25 pm

Eww *attacked

lol

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
2:31 pm

Ray & AJ, I’ll bring the Baby Powder lol. I’ll pimp slap a fool ;-)

Ra'mon Austin

August 12th, 2009
2:40 pm

One name for me that keeps coming to mind is Bruce Bowen. I know we need two other bigs, but if they’re considering Flip or Hart. I’d much rather see Bowen brought in. To have Bowen and Evans on the bench to come in and harass opposing players for periods in the game would be a great to get the transition game going for Teague and Crawford on the 2nd unit. Another thing Bowen brings on the 2nd unit is the ability to hit the corner 3 with consistency. With this roster, JJ’s offense won’t be missed unbearably when he’s resting, but his defense will. So I say have Bowen on the bench, who’s defense is comparable.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
2:42 pm

WOW. th Hornets just traded Rasul Butler to the Clippers for a conditional 2nd Round pick. CP3 can’t be happy about this….

Could the Hornets be looking to add a guy like Flip Murray on the cheap? Well, maybe not considering they drafted that LSU guy Marcus Thorton to play SG Hmm…..

fudd21

August 12th, 2009
2:46 pm

Goodness! I actually half way agree with a Rod comment and to think not a sentence of Marvin bashing. I for one can’t wait to see Jamal and JJ on the court together. People can talk about the low percentage and volume shooting all they want but Jamal brings an element that has not been here since JJ has, another bonafide scorer on the floor. This should lower JJ minute and as Rod said (still can’t beleive Im agreeing) take away some doubles when they play together.
Ok KevinA come on and give us your negative comments about Jamal so I can come down off my high.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
3:13 pm

Rasual Butler is a nice player. Hard to tell how much of his performance last year was related to CP3 but I can tell you, dude has a good jumper and blocks a fair amount of shots for a wing player. CP3 really can’t be too mad, he signed that extension and likely knew at the time that budgets would be tough in that market.

Ray, you must have missed it. Sekou brought up Loren Woods’ name. Jason Hart came from another source. How do you even think about a guy who was pathetic at his prime and is now 3-4 years removed from that? Why not just sign that joint-smoking guy who played for the Pacers 2-3 years ago, Harrison is his last name. He’s probably a better choice than Loren F’ing Woods.

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
3:13 pm

Rod & Ray

Just to add to the discussion about JJ size advantage, listed below is a power ranking of the top 10 SG as sourced from cbssports.com:

1) KOBE BRYANT, SG 6’-6” WT 206 LBS
2) DWYANE WADE, SG 6’-4” WT 216 LBS
3) TRACY MCGRADY, SG 6’-8” WT 223 LBS
4) MANU GINOBILI, SG 6’-6” WT 205 LBS
5) JOE JOHNSON, SG 6’-7” WT 240 LBS
6) BRANDON ROY, SG 6’-6” WT 211 LBS
7) RICHARD HAMILTON, SG 6’-7” WT 193 LBS
8) MICHAEL REDD, SG 6’-6” WT 215 LBS
9) ALLEN IVERSON, SG 6’-0” WT 180 LBS
10) RAY ALLEN, SG, 6’-5” WT 205 LBS

As shown, what stands out more for JJ is not so much his height but his weight. Perhaps this explain some of the criticism that been directed at him. Despite having his huge size advantage for a SG, JJ hasn’t yet mastered his post-up game to fully exploit the mismatches. I have seen on many occasions when he is guarded by a smaller defender, instead of being aggressive with a post move, JJ will just settle for a jump shot. Granted he is doubled (or even trebled) teamed most of the time, but some times he is not and he doesn’t exploit the situation this way; mainly because JJ is a natural jump shooter. That is his natural instinct. At this point in his career, he needs to reprogram himself and expand is game. Looking forward, we need players that can help spread the defense to make this opportunity available to JJ. However, JJ most continue to work on that part of his game to make the strategy work.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
3:19 pm

Truth, I disagree. JJ posts all the time. Backing his man down in the lane for the turnaround floater is his bread and butter.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
3:22 pm

David Harrison. And no, I don’t want him, but I’d rather see him in a Hawks uniform than Loren Woods.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
3:25 pm

Ariose, I agree. He doesn’t post-up like Mitch Richmond used to do, but he definitely will take his man into the lane. He doesn’t have the explosive athleticism to go to the rim, so he more often goes with the floater.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
3:30 pm

Jhan,

We actually agree. You can’t have it both ways. So if a guy has been in the league for 5 years and has almost 1000 blocks and close to 500 steals, how can you possibly overlook that and say none of that matters? There is a reason why Josh is considered a better player than Marvin. It is because he is a better player, and I can make an educated guess that it is not because of his offense. My points actually have not been proven incorrect. Others have voiced their OPINIONS, which I responded to with facts. No need to try to figure me out. I’m good. My basic and overall arguement since I started posting here is that Josh is better than Marvin, which is proven by stats and contracts. Marvin is a bust, which is proven by stats and contracts. Whats so hard to figure out? Actually the only people that I talk to who have a high opinion of Marvin are people on this blog, and a small percntage of fans and management of the Atlanta Hawks. No one else including athletes and entertainers who I deal with on a weekly basis thinks highly of the guy. I even have a good friend who played football for the Tarheels in the 90’s and bleeds tarheel blue, who calls me on a regular basis and tells me how disappointing the guy is. As Sam from the Swats said, there were not any other teams trying to pry Marvin away from the Hawks(restricted or unrestricted). I’m sure there are some teams in the leage who would love to have a great player such as Marvin. What team woouldn’t want a guy who can shut Lebron James, and Carmelo Anthony down. LOL

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
3:32 pm

Ariose

I said JJ hasn’t yet mastered his post-up game to fully exploit the mismatches. To me, that is a big difference. I think JJ will admit that he needs to continue to improve to where he is unstoppable. I don’t thing he is there yet. Just me

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
3:35 pm

Truth, IDK, you may be right, but I can’t remeber JJ ever struggling to score points on a post up. But like you said, that doesn’t mean he has masterd the craft.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
3:38 pm

And you know with Teams like CLE, the have Bigs who don’t leave the paint, so even if he does have a mis match(Like Delonte West) teams will try to minimize his ability to exploit them.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
3:39 pm

The Truth,

Great post. That is why I am stating that JJ can play the three with no problem. I see him being similar to Paul Pierce. I think Pierce used to be the 2, but once Boston got Allen, they moved him to the 3. Same scenario for us. Crawford is to good to be a bench player, and he might well be our best offensive player. I guess my point was proven wrong agian huh. LOL. Great post.

gwite

August 12th, 2009
3:47 pm

We know JJ has the explosiveness around the rim, as far as having the physical tools for it. I think it’s that, since he “broke his face”, he either conciously or subconciously, avoids the high wire acts, for the most part.

Daniel

August 12th, 2009
4:01 pm

Hoops- I hear you, and I am sure that the Joe Smith deal is coming down to length of contract. If we extend Joe at 15-16 mil. and have Joe Smith at 3-4 mil, we should still be fine. Of course, that would limit us from making any other moves next off season, but I would probably do it. I guess we will see what Sund and/or Smith is willing to do. Trying to read between the lines with Sekou. It seems that the Hawks have made an offer and are closely monitoring the Smith situation

jhan

August 12th, 2009
4:11 pm

Rod – Anybody who says Marvin is better than Josh would be incorrect. I don’t rememeber anyone making that claim but they would be wrong.

The tag of “bust” for Marvin would be incorrect also. The guy averages 14pts & 6reb per game. That is not a bust. Those numbers are above average for a teams 3rd/4th option on offense. His salary of $7.5M/year is right in line for his production.

As a former college player would you consider yourself a bust if those were your career averages? Somehow I don’t think so.

Blocked shots are great but not the final say-so on a defensive players contributions. It might be equally important that a defender keep his man from getting to his “sweet spot” on the floor. Or how about being able to push your man into a double team?

I like Josh Smith as much as anyone on this blog (except for maybe Ray) but his blocked shots come from weakside help & his steals come from playing the passing lanes. Have you kept track of how many times Josh went for the steal, missed, then his man had an easy layup? I’ve been a season ticket holder for the last 5 years & I’ve seen that happen many times.

I’m not sure why these guys have to be “all-world” or “bust” in your mind.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
4:13 pm

Another question for all you smart guys. What 3 in the east would be a problem for JJ? Pierce, Granger, Young, Prince, Deng, Lebron….. I think Cleveland is similar also in the fact that once they got West, they put Lebron at the three. Joe on paper seems to be a mismatch for most 2’s but our offense does not take advantage of that. He actually does not post up much. Mostly ISO’s, which is crazy when you really think about it. Crawford at 6′5 is a better matchup for most of the 2’s in the east. Allen, Hamilton, West, Pietrus, Gordon (traded)….. guess I’m wrong again.

Ken Strickland

August 12th, 2009
4:17 pm

DOC-I been on these blogs long enough to detect you had game, but soul too!!! Lou Rawls, Marvin Gaye and Otis Redding, what can I say. YOU GO DUDE.

jhan

August 12th, 2009
4:18 pm

The problem with JJ playing the 3 is our frontline would be two 6′9″ guys and a 6′7″ guy.

In short spurts or against certain teams I love JJ playing the 3. Last year our best lineup offensively was Bibby, Flip, JJ, Josh & Horford. Defensively – not so great.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
4:46 pm

Jhan,

I remember many people on this blog making that claim. I would be a bust if I was drafted #2 in a draft where the two player drafted after me are extremly better players, and the # 2 picks the following 2 years were much better players than me. And the guy who was drafted to play the same position as me the year before me at # 17 ended up being a better player than me on the same team. If I was projected to be the next big thing in the NBA by most scouts, and I ended up being the 4th or 5th best player on my team, when I was drafted to be the 1st or second best player on the team, I would be a bust.

“I like Josh Smith as much as anyone on this blog (except for maybe Ray) but his blocked shots come from weakside help & his steals come from playing the passing lanes.”

So you are telling me that this guy has almost 1000 blocks in his career, and all of them come from weakside help? All of his almost 500 steals come from playing the passing lanes? And you are trying to figure me out. C’mon. get real. Wake up.

bigdave

August 12th, 2009
4:52 pm

Daniel…

Powe agreed to terms with the Cavs… however, he isnt expected to play til Feb…

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
4:53 pm

Jhan,

“The problem with JJ playing the 3 is our frontline would be two 6′9″ guys and a 6′7″ guy.”

What’s the difference in that and 3 6′9 guys? It not like Marvin plays big. He can’t guard any 4’s, so what’s your point? In the playoffs we could not defend or score. Wouldn’t you want to be able to at least do one.

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
4:54 pm

Rod,

I said there is more of an advantage for THIS TEAM to have JJ at the 2 spot. If we didn’t have a 6′9″ PF as our center, and a 6′9″ SF as our power forward, I would have far less of an issue with it.

But we don’t. And I can’t remember anybody who said that Marvin was better than Josh. If that were the case, how come nobody is having a problem with Marvin getting $37 million and Josh getting $58 million? I haven’t heard a peep. Likewise, nobody said Marvin was shutting down Lebron and Carmelo Anthony.

What people HAVE said is that Marvin is quick enough and big enough to bother guys like that when he’s playing good defense. The man is 6′9″ and 245 lbs. He has a 7′3″ wingspan. Who would you rather have on those guys, JJ? How about 6′5″ Mo Evans? Not me. You don’t want JJ on those guys because you need him to save his energy for offense. You don’t want Mo on those guys because he’s too small.

This whole business about Marvin being possibly our best perimeter defender seems to be a confusing concept. I’ll break it down, since it’s a subject of argument. First, who among our guards is a good defender? Bibby? Stop with the stale jokes. How about Jamal? No real history of ball-hawking. Teague? He’s a rook. Flip? He isn’t bad, but he wasn’t good all that often either. Mo Evans? He played the 3 too much, and got burned quite a bit there. That leaves Marvin. Marvin is quick enough to play on the perimeter, and is not keen on playing post defense or blocking shots. He has the quickness. He has the size. He has the wingspan. He does not have the post defending mindset, nor the shot-blocking instincts. He does not over-commit very often and has become better at lateral movement.

Thus, he is our best perimeter defender. Not our best on-ball defender. Our best PERIMETER defender. When he’s on his game.

What about JJ, you say? He’s capable of being our best perimeter defender. He has a great combination of strength, quickness, and stability. But he does take plays off. He doesn’t bother people enough with his size. And because his greatest responsibility is on offense, we only get to see his defensive prowess in spurts. And I think part of it is mindset. Ask Kobe how much of a difference that makes….

What about Josh Smith, you say? NOT a perimeter defender. Sure, he could do it, but Josh lacks the discipline and mindset of a guy like Bruce Bowen. Yet, he has ALL of the physical tools to be better than guys like Bowen, Artest, and Battier. He also has an incredible shot-blocking instinct, an ability to get steals where others just can’t, and can get into the collective heads of the entire opposing team on defense, when he’s on his game.

But perimeter defense is not the best place to utilize him, and that’s NOT where he is utilized. As Samuel astutely noted, nobody on this team can flat out dominate on defense like Josh can. One more time…that’s not done from the perimeter.

Besides, you don’t want your best shot-blocking/shot-bothering presence out there chasing guards around the arc, do ya? I know I don’t.

Anyway, a lot of this comes down to one fact. You don’t like Marvin, and you want him out of the starting lineup. Well, until we can get bigger at the 5 spot, I have news for ya: it’s not a good idea.

One more fact for you, since you claim to have a plethora of them that you keep telling us about (other than his stats, I can’t think of any, but whatever): Marvin didn’t pick himself #2 in the draft. Billy Knight did. Case closed. If 14 and 6 is a disappointment, then it’s a disappointment. Yes, I agree, I want to see more. But where this guy was picked said more about the guy who picked him than anything else.

I’m not telling you that your opinion is wrong. But don’t come around here talking like everybody else here has opinions and you have facts.

You’re from College Park. I thought folks from that spot new plenty about how to Keep It Real …..

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
4:55 pm

Ladies and gentlemen, we are witnesses to an intense “bro-mance”. ‘Nuff said.

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
5:02 pm

“What’s the difference in that and 3 6′9 guys? It not like Marvin plays big. He can’t guard any 4’s, so what’s your point? In the playoffs we could not defend or score. Wouldn’t you want to be able to at least do one?”

1) Marvin can guard some 4s. Not all 4s are really 4s, and not all of them are in-the-paint operators. I’ve seen Woody play Marvin at the 4 plenty of times. I’m surprised you missed that.

2)Funny that you mention we couldn’t defend or score in the playoffs. Well now. You can’t blame Marvin, could you? He was out for most of the playoffs, only playing spare minutes. Strange thing is, I seem to remember when they put him in there against Miami in one of those games, dude reeled off 10 points REAL fast. After that, he didn’t get to play hardly again. Marvin scores if you run plays for him. It’s that simple. He’s our 4th option, and sometimes our fifth. We don’t run plays for him. Yet he gets 14 ppg. Weird.

3)The difference is not all about height. Have you watched how JJ gets rebounds? He doesn’t usually get them by going deep into the paint to fight for position for them. He also doesn’t outleap guys for them. As strong as Joe is, we don’t get to see that strength used the way it could be. It’s mindset. Put Joe at the 3 and see if he gets more rebounds than Marvin. Doubt it.

Another thing, total size makes a difference. Marvin is taller, has a greater wingspan, and weighs more. One more time, would you rather your 4th/5th option get a defensive assignment for the duration of the game, or do you want to wear out your 1st option with it? Even a Woody hater wouldn’t call Woody that stupid.

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
5:03 pm

Astro Joe,

ROFL….it’s starting to look more like an orgy. And on that note, I’m out…

jhan

August 12th, 2009
5:32 pm

Rod – were you aware that Josh Smith averages less than one rebound per game more than Marvin?

Josh plays PF – a position that demands rebounding – but doesn’t really rebound any better than our SF. Using your logic wouldn’t that make Josh a “bust”?

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
5:57 pm

Big Ray,

Yeah, I’m sure his career playoff stats would have really mattered.

RPG SPG BPG
Career Playoff — 13 10 22.8 0.391 0.167 0.837 1.1 1.8 2.8 0.8 0.5 0.4 1.46 2.20 8.5

We really missed those 3 rebounds and all those blocks and steals he gets. Maybe with those 8.5 points a game we could have beaten Cleveland. It’s funny how Joe averages 1 less rebound (4.2) for his career than Marvin (5.5) from the 2 position. I guess you are sure that if you moved Joe to the 3, he couldn’t get one more rebound a game huh. Then you want to mention 10 quick points he scored in the playoffs. What about the times when Lebron saw him trying to guard him, and he laughed and went right by him. Did you see that? Can’t have it both ways. If he suited up, it counts.

“And I can’t remember anybody who said that Marvin was better than Josh. If that were the case, how come nobody is having a problem with Marvin getting $37 million and Josh getting $58 million? I haven’t heard a peep. Likewise, nobody said Marvin was shutting down Lebron and Carmelo Anthony.”

False statement. Wanna bet? Because you can’t remember does that make it a fact. I did not say you said that. One of your lunchroom buddies did.

“What about JJ, you say? He’s capable of being our best perimeter defender. He has a great combination of strength, quickness, and stability. But he does take plays off. He doesn’t bother people enough with his size. And because his greatest responsibility is on offense, we only get to see his defensive prowess in spurts. And I think part of it is mindset. Ask Kobe how much of a difference that makes….”

And Marvin does not take plays off. KEEP IT REAL RAY.

” Marvin can guard some 4s. Not all 4s are really 4s, and not all of them are in-the-paint operators. I’ve seen Woody play Marvin at the 4 plenty of times. I’m surprised you missed that.”

I must have missed those games. LOL

To really keep it all the way real, Mario West is the best perimeter defender on the team, but you can believe what you want to. I response to you statement about me using facts, or whatever you were yapping about. My statement that Marvin is not our best perimeter defender is based on stats, my knowledge of the game, and situations. I have never once seen Woodson put Marvin on the other teams best player at the end of a game. I have seen him use Joe, Josh, and Mario. I would think that if he was so good we would use him like that, wouldn’t you?

I could go on and on about your post, but you being the expert…..

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
6:06 pm

Jhan,

Josh – 7.4 RPG for career
Marvin – 5.5 for career

You do the math.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
6:47 pm

Oooh, This is so good, I don’t wanna interject. Rod, you do have a point with that last statement. That’s true, but like ray said, our best “potenial” defenders have OTHER duties so they cannot guard the best player THE WHOLE GAME. Kobe didn’t do it this season, Ariza did…..until crunch time that is.

Listen, Maybe marvin Shouldn’t have been the #2 pick. We’ll NEVER know until woodson starts treating him like the #2 pick and gives him those plays/touches….AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN. It’s also fairly plain to see that Marvin is no Carmelo, Lebron, and pretaining to certain abilites(On offense NOT Defense) even Rudy Gay.

But if your opinion of Marvin is truly “based on stats, my knowledge of the game, and situations.” Then there is NO WAY you can be in your normal coherent state of mind and beleive that we didn’t need Marvin in the playoffs.

8-O

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
7:03 pm

Also, Marvin was coming off Back and Wrist injuries in the playoffs while he was defending Lebrick. Not to mention that his conditioning couldn’t have been top notch at that time.

If you want to judge Marvin’s perfomances against LeBrick or Marshmello from last season try games where he was healthy.

The December home(win) game or the Rematch on March 4th where we lost on a JJ buzzer beater. The Febuary game where he dropped 31 on Melo when Bibby AND Horford were out.

What about the 28pts he dropped on the Wiz on the last day of a back to back. What about the 29 he dropped in Charlotte when Joe was out? What about the 18-21 FT’s he hit? I beleive he had a 14 rebound game also…

The man is solid. If we ran plays for him he would average OVER 20ppg EASY. He’s a FOUL MAGNET If he doesn’t get if from the feild, he’ll get it from the line. One thing that hasn’t changed since he was drafted is his potential. It has more to do with MIKE WOODSONS play calling than it has to do with Mr. Williams.

UGA

August 12th, 2009
7:10 pm

Marvin is one of our best players by far. Outside of Joe and maybe Crawford, he is our next best scoring option. I would personally like to see us iso him more on the block because he is getting better with his back to the basket. In a few years he is going to be tought to guard.

Paul or Williams would have been nice, but here in the future, Marvin will be one of the best SF’s in the NBA.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
7:14 pm

The reason I said it’s not gonna happen, is because if Marvin was our ist option EVERY night we wouldn’t win as many games. BUT, that doesn’t meant the man is not capable of putting up big numbers. But this is a TEAM sport and MARVIN IS PLAYING HIS ROL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVEREALL SUCCESS OF THIS TEAM. Nothing more, Nothing less. He’s a great character guy. He’s not cring for touches like T.O, he wants to win. That’s the goal. TEAM SUCCESS. Individual accolades are just icing on the cake.

YOU KNOW IT’S TRUE TOO. If it weren’t, Antione Walker, Steve Francis, and Stephon Marbury wouldn’t be put of jobs right now.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
7:16 pm

Typos…

*1st

*Role

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
7:19 pm

UGA, I agree with that. I would also have to say that with his limited offensive role and the fact that our coach has no imaination on offensively, he already is one of the best SF’s in the leauge.

Doug

August 12th, 2009
7:32 pm

Rod: A. NO ONE on this board has stated Marvin is a “better player” than Josh…He is a better shooter…more disciplined…and a better on ball perimeter defender. There. What point are you trying to prove? One that no one is debating. JJ won’t start at the “3″—nor should he. Thanks God Woody is not THAT ignorant. Did Marvin dunk on you somewhere or something?? Don’t disappear when he is going at around 17-7 this year. Some players take longer to “get there”…doesn’t mean they are busts. Now….Robert Swift…LaRue Martin…Shelden Williams…THOSE are busts!!!

UGA

August 12th, 2009
7:33 pm

You are right about him being a Foul Magnet, plus he makes them.
He’s already developed his outside shot, he’s getting better with his back to the basket and he’s been working on his ball handling. If that improves where he is able to drive and get to the basket, then watch out. He’s only 23 I think. He’s about to turn into one heck of a player.

He’s also shown the abililty to hit CLUTCH shots. That first game in Boston where he hit the 3, eventhough we lost. Plus the game at home against Washington he hit the go ahead 3.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
7:37 pm

Ramon

August 12th, 2009
7:48 pm

Marvin is the 5th best starter we have on our team, and the second best natural scorer. If Marvin went to Miami, Philly, Washington, Utah, Portland, Denver, and many other teams, he’d easily be the 2nd or 3rd best player. One thing about Marvin (and Smooth) is that you can easily see improvements in their game each season. I do see Marvin being able to average 18 ppg in an offense. If Marvin went to New York today he would very easily be their BEST player, while putting up 23 a night. The thing that stands out for me about Marvin is he’s getting to the point with his jumper, that every time he shoots, you think its going in. And he is getting more and more comfortable penetrating the lane to draw fouls.

I used to hate his defense, but now you can actually see that he’s improved to one of the best three defenders on the team. Someone said that Pierce eyes would get big when he’d see Marvin guarding him. Well I guess that can be said that Shaq eyes got big when Deke would guard him, or Kobe loved to see Bowen come. Pierce is one match up problem for most 3s in the league. That doesn’t make Marvin that much worse.

The Truth

August 12th, 2009
7:48 pm

As Rodney King once coined it, “Can’t We All Just Get Along?”

The beautiful thing about this blog is that we all bring different opinions to the table THAT ADDS VALUE TO THE DIALOGUE.

While we are posturing and jabbing, let us not lose that prospective.

PEACE

KevinA

August 12th, 2009
7:49 pm

fudd21

Goodness! I actually half way agree with a Rod comment and to think not a sentence of Marvin bashing. I for one can’t wait to see Jamal and JJ on the court together. People can talk about the low percentage and volume shooting all they want but Jamal brings an element that has not been here since JJ has, another bonafide scorer on the floor. This should lower JJ minute and as Rod said (still can’t beleive Im agreeing) take away some doubles when they play together.
Ok KevinA come on and give us your negative comments about Jamal so I can come down off my high.

I never said Crawford can’t change his style of play. To get a meaningful amount of minutes he will have to. Niremetal is willing to eat shoes in his belief that this will happen.

Crawford seems to have the same defensive skill of Bibby. The idea of a trifecta of great shooters will be hard to phathem if they can’t play defense.

With JJ playing iso in a contract year it will be interesting to see how many times he gets the ball with enough time to make a play.

Crawford scores much better from the left side of the floor so maybe JJ can play point to get them on the floor together.

If Crawford can play defense and JJ moves to the 3 the offense might work out great. Anybody want to bet some shoe eating on that one?

Crawford plays his best offense in the 4th qt and I realize he can be quite good in spurts. But if you look at his 2nd qt and 3rd qt FG%, you see dismal shooting. In spite of my reservations I hope Crawford has a great year and becomes a leader on the team. I believe he should be given every opportunity to apply his skills.

Ramon

August 12th, 2009
7:57 pm

Anakin, that was a great article. If Smooth continues doing things like that, it will become impossible for Sund to trade him. As said on this blog before, Smooth grades in high school were the best at the academy. So when people say he doesn’t have an IQ, they’re sadly mistaken. Thanks for the link, Anakin.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
8:07 pm

Ramon, I’m glad that he is doing community projects, but I don’t think that has much to do with him being traded in the future. Not nearly as much as that trade kicker in his contract. If we could trade Josh for Andrew Bynum, I don’t care if dude is handing out sneakers at the GoodWill store… trade him (sorry Sam/Rod).

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
8:08 pm

AJ, Ditto What Ramon Said.

Ariose

August 12th, 2009
8:11 pm

Bynum’s not ready yet. Mabe if he stays health for a few seasons. Even then, He is not on Smooves level….yet.

Ramon

August 12th, 2009
8:13 pm

Anakin, I’m crazy I know, but today I still wouldn’t do that trade lol. Smooth has played more games in one season, than Bynum has in the last two seasons (not including playoffs). Hawks don’t need any center who wears Stacy Adams during the games more than he wears Nikes.

Anakin Joe

August 12th, 2009
8:27 pm

I’d do ythat trade. But the point I was trying to make is that a summer camp or two should not stop Sund from improving the team if he thinks he can do that by trading any player including Smith. I think Sund may have been the one who traded Seattle legend (from his high school days and days at the state school) Gary Payton to Milwaukee for Ray Allen.

darrell starks

August 12th, 2009
8:31 pm

UGA are you serious about marvin being the best player on the team behind joe and crawford.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

August 12th, 2009
8:35 pm

IN ORDER UGA JOE, JOSH, CRAWFORD, HORFORD, MARVIN, BIBBY, ZAZA, MOE, TEAGUE, AND THE REST OF THE TEAM.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Ramon

August 12th, 2009
8:38 pm

Anakin, you’re right but Payton was over 30 yrs old then and washed up lol. And he wasn’t selling tickets any more. Smooth sells tickets, and barring injury is 7-8 years from the end of his prime. lol. But I get what you’re saying.

Ramon

August 12th, 2009
8:40 pm

Darrell, I take Teague over Zaza AND Moe, lol. Its just something about him. At worst, I see him being Ellis.

darrell starks

August 12th, 2009
8:43 pm

Horford must step his game up this year a big disappointment this past season.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

August 12th, 2009
8:45 pm

Ramon how can you say that and we haven’t seen him play on a nba level.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

jhan

August 12th, 2009
9:15 pm

Rod – I was comparing last years stats. I know we’ve had this argument before but what they did their 1st years in the league mean nothing to me. Just like what position they were drafted. I’m concerned about what they are giving the Hawks now.

KevinA

August 12th, 2009
9:39 pm

IN ORDER JOSH, JOE, MARVIN, HORFORD, BIBBY, ZAZA, CRAWFORD, MOE, TEAGUE.

This list will reflect the new pecking order by the end of the year.

KevinA

August 12th, 2009
9:48 pm

darrell starks

Horford must step his game up this year a big disappointment this past season.

Al is a good solid young player. In no way did he disappoint. Josh, Marvin, and ZaZa fit the same discription.

niremetal

August 12th, 2009
9:53 pm

Pecking order? What the hell does that even mean?

UGA

August 12th, 2009
10:09 pm

From earlier, Marvin is the 2nd or 3rd best scoring option. Overall, yes Horford is ahead.

Rod from College Park

August 12th, 2009
10:10 pm

jhan,

“I was comparing last years stats. I know we’ve had this argument before but what they did their 1st years in the league mean nothing to me. Just like what position they were drafted. I’m concerned about what they are giving the Hawks now.”

That is were the problem lies. You can’t just use last years stats. Marvin was hurt a lot and Josh missed time also. A better way to judge is using career stats. They both played from the time they came into the league. That’s part of my whole argument. You are judging things from last year, I am judging from day 1.

Darrell Starks,

I agree. I would put Bibby before Marvin. More important to the team.

Doug,

You were not around when those comments were made. Last year when the Josh contract issue was going on. Maybe you were, but I don’t remember you. No he did not dunk on me, he would probably fall on his way to the hoop.

Ariose,

I honestly don’t think Marvin would have made a difference in the playoffs. In the Cleveland series we scored 72,85,82 and 74, while Cleveland scored 99, 105, 97, and 84. Not being able to put the ball in the basket was our problem, and that dumb switching on everything, along with not doubling Lebron like they did Joe, was are issue. Marvin would have had no impact. When he got hurt, it forced Woodson to use Flip more who was a much better offensive option than Marvin last year.

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
10:27 pm

“No he did not dunk on me, he would probably fall on his way to the hoop.”

There we go with those facts again…

“You were not around when those comments were made. Last year when the Josh contract issue was going on. Maybe you were, but I don’t remember you.”

Heh. Which one is it? He was there, or you just don’t remember him? But you remember how many times Marvin fell down…I remember you posting that on the Hawks Hack blog, and getting called for your BS..that’s what I remember

Big Ray

August 12th, 2009
10:30 pm

Doug,

Good points. The first one was one I was trying to make. But Rod swears those deplorable words were uttered, and I’m waiting to see which “lunch buddy” will get the conviction, and I’m sure there is a witness or two available to testify to the crime.

But I’m not holding my breath…

Ramon

August 12th, 2009
11:22 pm

Darrell, you’re right we haven’t seen him play on that level. But some guys just gets it, and he gets it. His attitude is a total 180 degree change from what Law was when he came in. I just know he’s going to be special. And I do believe he’s going to be the best PG in that draft.

Melvin

August 12th, 2009
11:27 pm

Each time I come back to Hawks page, I’m hoping to see an article that says we signed Joe Smith. I can’t understand why the Hawks haven’t made him an offer he can’t refuse, its not like they have viable options. Oh well, there’s always tomorrow…

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
12:33 am

You were not around when those comments were made. Last year when the Josh contract issue was going on. Maybe you were, but I don’t remember you. No he did not dunk on me, he would probably fall on his way to the hoop.

Come on now, Rod. I just Googled back in time and, as I suspected, you didn’t post on here a single time last summer (unless, of course, you posted under a different name). I see two posts from you in March 2008, and then nothing until February of this year. I don’t remember you being around then, but I sure was around myself (posting as “Matt”), and I sure as heck don’t remember anyone saying Marvin was better than Josh back then.

Ken Strickland

August 13th, 2009
12:35 am

ROD FROM CP-career stats in many cases are even less reliable in judging a players worth than season stats. Josh has been a starter his entire 5yr career, while Marvin has started only 3 of his 4 yrs. That means Josh has played far more gms and mins that Marvin. Also, having been a starter 2 more yrs than Marvin, Josh has become a primary scoring option while Marvin has been a secondary scoring option. Josh gets plays called for him while Marvin doesn’t. How can you fail to see those issues as a difference maker?

You know ROD, people keep making viable and insightful points in support of Marvin abilities. Yet, you continue pushing your agenda by referencing isolated plays and incidents to sum up your perception of his overall abilities. To continue your position in the face of so much logic and common sense leads me to wonder if your problem is a low basketball IQ, or a low overall IQ, or you’re just getting off on all of the attention you’re getting, if not all of the above. I’m all for everyone presenting their opinions, but at least let them be informed opinions.

The thing that impressed me the most about Marvin is how he managed to improve his DEF, long range shooting, ballhandling, turnover ratio and overall confidence in just one off season. I’d love to see Woodson analyze the OFF strengths of Josh and Marvin then design OFF plays and options to take advantage of those strengths. Or at least allow one of his assistants do it. Phil Jackson put his ego aside and allowed one of his assistants to design the triangle OFF, which he’ll ride into a HOF coaching career. Sometimes, a HC’s greatest strength is in recognizing his weaknesses or shortcomings and relying on the strengths of his assistants.

Mystikal

August 13th, 2009
12:50 am

Hey Sekou,

I know hawks main focus now is getting Joe Smith signed (as should be), but you know who else they may be looking to fulfill the roster? You hear any word about Korolev? I think he’d be a nice edition to play behind Marv at the 3. He has good size, can shoot lights out, and is coming into his own so he’d fit right in with everyone. Not sure how he is on other side of the ball, but playing under Woody he’d have no choice but to get better defensively.

Rod from College Park

August 13th, 2009
2:14 am

Ken Strickland,

It’s similar to how you consistently make the same statements about Woodson, everytime you post. Interesting that you would throw your 2 cents in. Woodson must have dunked on you. No problems with IQ thru college, life or basketball, but hey believe what you want. It won’t stop my bills from getting paid. Plays are run for him, he just does not finish them at a high rate. He passes out of the post most of the time. Josh became a scoring option because he is more aggressive, and he is a better player(back to my original point). I choose not to live in the world of if’s, so I can’t relate to that other nonsense you are talking.

Nire,

Keep looking. Might help you with your investigative skills. See if you can find someone who uses the word clown. Good luck.

Rod from College Park

August 13th, 2009
2:24 am

Ken Strickland,

“ROD FROM CP-career stats in many cases are even less reliable in judging a players worth than season stats. Josh has been a starter his entire 5yr career, while Marvin has started only 3 of his 4 yrs.”

Josh in his first year averaged 27 minutes a game, and Marvin’s first year he averaged 24. Every other year they both averaged more than 30 minutes a game. They can be compared. Try again.

Drewscrilla

August 13th, 2009
2:50 am

This going to be our year just wait its time to shock the world again tell sund to sign Joe Smith and lets crank this season up Tell woody to get everybody on the same page and win one for the A. GO HAWKS!!!!!

Drewscrilla

August 13th, 2009
2:54 am

I am also waiting to for this page to say we sign Joe Smith or Some big.
Lets Get it.

vava74

August 13th, 2009
3:05 am

Rod,

You are nowhere near the truth. Going a bit back, ALL DEF teams are overrated measures of a player’s defensive hability: Denver improved defensively as a team without Camby – dramatically – so that should mean something for you.

You should read Charley Rosen’s columns @ foxsports in order to get a differentiated non-hyped oppinion on BBall.

As a point of order, I would like to emphasise that I am very happy with our roster, including Al @ the 5 spot.

What we really need is that J-Smoove realises that he is a role player – a 5 star one – who should concentrate on defense and rebounding. If he did that, he would average 16/18ppg, 12rpg 3apg 3bpg and 2spg easily.

Marvin should get his offensive touches: he is a better shooter, a better penetrator and gets the calls to get to the line.

J-Smoove alienates the officials with his childish behaviour and doesn’t get the calls.

As for Crawford going into the starting lineup and JJ to the SF spot, that would immediately lower our FG% and our defensive capability Would you really want to have Bibby and Jamal on your starting back court on the defensive end??

Right now we have a high FG% with Marvin on the SF spot and (when healthy) a high FG% on the SG spot with JJ.

If we inserted Jamal on the starting line up he would get too many touches and we would have difficulty distributing them effectively. Jamal is better suited as a 6th man who can be quickly removed from the lineup if he is cold (as he often is), just like Flip who had a good year on account of a mix of very good and very bad games.

Ed

August 13th, 2009
4:01 am

Well doc & ken strick just struck a nerve so I had to leap ahead and jump on board w/ the Otis Redding, Marvin Gaye, & Lou Rawls bandwagon. Just to add a few, Sam Cooke, Jackie Wilson, Eddie Floyd, Solomon Burke…wow were those the days. What made Otis so special is he wrote most of his own material. One of my favorites being “Cigarettes & Coffee…

wordsmithtom

August 13th, 2009
5:52 am

Ed, great list. Solomon still getting play on Siris’ Outlaw Country station. Their “Americana” format. Dude’s still recording. An article on “King Solomon” you’ll enjoy.

http://www.honesttune.com/content/view/1030/49/

darrell starks

August 13th, 2009
6:17 am

Who in the world is jason hart what team does he play for?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

August 13th, 2009
6:24 am

For the million time we need flip, the guy is not asking for a lot of money so why let your best player of the bench walk away for nothing its makes no sense, the same old hawks should have kept solo, and flip.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Clyde

August 13th, 2009
7:53 am

Have we signed a center yet?

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
8:21 am

Sekou- Please help!! We need some news. I can’t take much more of Rod telling us how terrible Marvin is, and how great he is because he played ball and interacts with “entertainers” It is soooo old.

Mike is back

August 13th, 2009
8:33 am

AJ, Ditto for me too…GREAT ARTICLE!!!!

U NO THAT MAKES US SMOOVE FOLK PROUD!!!

Save for Nire. Heh heh heh

jerrywest

August 13th, 2009
9:00 am

A Knicks fanatic told me that Crawford+JJ backcourt will be unstoppable. CC can play real Point Gurard. He is the ideal player to play next to JJ and he’ll make Bibby redundant.

and I was thinking Crawford was just a much better Flip.

Doug

August 13th, 2009
9:38 am

Rod: It’s one thing to debate the relative merits of two players in a reasoned, sensible fashion. This obviously is not what you have in mind, i.e. you reference Marvin as a”clown” huh?, you constantly harp on his “falling down”, and seem utterly oblivious to ANY shortcomings of Josh, i.e. his childish, infantile reactions to officials, his total inability to develop a FUNCTIONAL outside shot, his extremely poor ball handling and decision making, etc… A person without an agenda would include those factors in any assessment and not, solely, continually, point out that he averages more blocked shots and steals. Again I pray you do not disappear when Marvin is in the 17-7 range this year…and that will be without Woody running ANYTHING for him …ever

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
9:57 am

This is for those who appreciated the soul music references:

Sweet Soul Music by Peter Guralnick.

The best ever book about the early years of this genre. I could not give it a higher recommendation. Most excellent.

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
10:01 am

Mystikal,

You said this about Korolev: “Not sure how he is on other side of the ball, but playing under Woody he’d have no choice but to get better defensively.”

So Mystikal, do you mean “better defensively” like Bibby got better when he came here? ;-)

ROFL!

Melvin

August 13th, 2009
10:12 am

Dang, no Joe Smith signing reported this morning. I will check back later.

Rod from College Park

August 13th, 2009
10:24 am

Vava74,

First let me state that you are entitled to your opinion,just like I am entitled to mine. If you don’t agree with what I post, that’s your perogative. We can agree to disagree You are not going to help me understand the game of basketball trust me. Charley Rosen won’t help me either. Now let me proceed with showing you how ignorant your post is. If you really beleive that Josh Smith is or should be a role player on this team, when he is the best defensive player, the second leading scorer, and the guy who fills up Phillips Arena, then we shouldn’t even continue to debate. You state that Marvin is a better penetrator than Josh. Not a true statement. Last year Josh played 69 games and went to the line 359 times. Marvin played 61 games and went to the line 273 times. Almost a hundred more times at the line with an 8 game difference. Neither one of them shoot techs, so why do you think the diffence is so big? Hmmmmmm. I have never argued Josh’s behavior issues. That does not matter to me. I personally hated Jordan when he barked at the refs everytime he went to the hole and did not get the call. That does not change my opinion of him as a player. Rasheed either. You state that putting Jamal in the starting lineup would lower or FG%. I can not say that at this point. I feel like another proven scorer, who might also command a double team, on the floor with Joe would open the floor up. Guys would be taking wide open shots as opposed to contested shots. That is my opinion. You state that Jamal is better suited as a 6 man, yet his most productive years in the league have been when he was a starter, so please help me understand your logic. Again most on my info is based on facts not what if’s.

Rod from College Park

August 13th, 2009
10:51 am

Doug,

Once again you are making statements with no knowledge of history. The “Clown” reference was to certain other bloggers. If you notice most of my post and addressing someone, therefore I am responding to earlier post or responding to someone who had my name in their mouth. Sensible huh. So it not sensible for me to base a players merits on what he has accomplished in the league, but I should listen to a bunch of ‘Clowns’ who continuosly base their opinions on things that have not happened. I have never hidden the fact that I don’t like Marvin’s game. If you call it an agenda, you say tomato, I say tomato. I’m not sensible to say that Josh is a better player than Marvin, but all of the stats, contracts, coaches, scouts prove otherwise. Let me give you some advise, invest in a dictionary and look up the word sensible. The statement that Woody NEVER runs plays for Marvin is untrue as well. I’ve had enough of debating with incompetence for the week. Back to lurker mode. You guys can get back to the world of what if’s and maybe’s and Hawks salary cap issues. Peace.

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
11:05 am

Sautee- that is a great book, highly reccomended. To throw another forgotten gem out there. Shuggie Otis’s Inspiration Information.

Rod- We got it. Marvin bad, Josh good. Hence Josh=60 mil, Marvin=37 mil. Josh=17, Marvin=2. Therefore Marvin is a bust.
Got anything else to actually add to the conversation?

Ken Strickland

August 13th, 2009
11:07 am

ROD FROM CP-please don’t think I’m of the opinion you have a low IQ, although I know I presented it that way. I mentioned 3 elements, (1)possible low basketball IQ, (2)possible low IQ overall and (3) seeking attention. You defended 1 & 2, but made no mention of 3, interesting. But regardless, we can agree to disagree, right?

You are very good at manipulating stats and facts to support your contentions. MWilliams was coming off UNC’s bench when Josh was playing 74 NBA gms and averaging 27.7MPG as a rookie. In Marvin’s rookie yr, he averaged 24.7MPG to Josh’s 32MPG. That’s a pretty good head start, don’t you think, and although their mins have been comparable every yr since, Josh has still gotten more MPG, and considerably more mins overall than Marvin.

You also make a habit of overlooking the roles that have been defined and assumed by the 2 players, as well as their individual talents. Josh came into the league as a rebounding shotblocking talent with limited OFF skills. Marvin came into the league as an OFF talent with little rebounding and DEF skills. Both have progressed tremendously and turned those limitations into strengths.

You made the following statement about me: “It’s simular to how you consistently make the same statements about Woodson EVERYTIME(caps mine) you post”. NOW THAT’S AN OVERSTATEMENT IF EVER I’VE HEARD ONE. BUT THAT’S JUST YOU EXAGGERATING AND SPINNING FACTS TO TRY AND SUPPORT YOUR CONTENTIONS.

You seem to think Marvin is the teams weakest link, while I think it’s Woodson. At any rate, Marvin is going to be with us for a few more yrs, while Woodson is going to be with us for at least the coming season. I’ve dealt with Woodson being our HC, although I will never stop making his distractions and shortcomings an issue as long as I feel they’re hendering the team. You have to come to grips with the fact Marvin is an intrigal part of this team, he’s going to be with us for a while and we’re not going to progress to the next level without him.

dap01

August 13th, 2009
11:17 am

SEKOU: Please help, this blog is struggling!

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
11:37 am

Hey guys, totally off topic here. But, I just got a Braves ticket plan, where you get 6 games, 5 this year and next years home opener, plus the right to buy playoff tickets for only $66. I thought it was going to be bad seats, but they are upper box, behind home plate, great view of the field and low row numbers 3-5. Man, I was blown away. Wish my Hawks tickets were like that. I spend more than that on one game.

doc

August 13th, 2009
11:47 am

ray “save the world with soul” is a lot better than “we are the world with a crappy coke in your hand”.

ken, aj, ed (glad your nerve got struck bro need to hear more from you) others in the discussion of importance in the dead zone of nba world, heh heh ….. my roots are deep in the stuff. essentially at 15 snuck into a james brown concert in jacksonville with three other white soul mates feeling very much out of place until the music began. to see him sing and play the crowd with its a mans world, still got chills. havent even begun to talk about the temptations and my favorites the four tops which a awakened too every morning when i was 16.

as far as otis … his death had me and another guy in the turnaround at school where the flag was, lowering it to half mast. we felt if it was good enough for a president 3 years earlier, then it was good enough for otis. it didnt stay that way for long but it was done, cried a bit and never heard anything better than dock of the bay. he was just moving into his own. yup nire, sam had a groove his own and a huge loss before his time as well, jerry butler, sam and dave. oh my, the list goes on.

go hawks! heh heh

Sekou Smith

August 13th, 2009
12:02 pm

I wish I could save us all from the August doldrums, but there’s nothing new going on just yet. Been trying to dig up some info on Joe Johnson but can’t get any traction right now. Phone lines have dried up. No one is returning calls. Leads me to believe that there is some serious deliberating going on about the extension.

Oberto to the Wizards was a nice roster-filling move that you wish the Hawks would have poked into a bit … but there’s no sense is worrying about things that have already happened.

Working on a loaner laptop until next week (when my new MegaMonster is ready). So you might have to deal with some glitches I’m trying to work through.

I did trade emails with Zaza the other day. He’s over with the Georgian national team training in Austria. I reminded him that no one here would forgive him if he got hurt like Gasol did working with the Spanish national team. If you’re on Twitter, feel free to give ZP the bizness there at http://twitter.com/zaza27.

Will hit y’all here and on the Twitter as soon as some news breaks.

vava74

August 13th, 2009
12:04 pm

Rod,

Obviously we are all entitled to our own oppinions. That is what makes the blog fun!

However, I still disagree: J-Smoove got to the line more because he either “gets” or “thinks he has” the green light to look for his own scoring opportunity, whilst Marvin acts within a more coherent team philosophy and does not break plays.

Furthermore, he is usually does not convert the FT’s at an acceptable rate 59% this year, 69% career.

If you look at the totals, Marvin converted 220 FT whilst J-Smoove 211 (I agree that in the playoffs he improved significantly, but just proves that his biggest problem is mental).

Hence, I think Marvin should get the green light to score more and J-Smoove should be cleaning the glass and making put backs instead of launching jump shots he cannot make or dribbling into turnover situations.

Just look at the turnover totals and averages for the two players and you will see that, with JUST the turnover differential, Josh loses the shotblocking differential he has on Marvin (I acknowledge that his bpg average dropped due to injuries).

And even if you add up the steals’ advantage, the differential in possessions for the team is almost NULL:

Josh: BPG 1,6, SPG 1,4 TO 2,33
Marvin: BPG 0,6 SPG 0,9 TO 1,15

In summary:

Josh gained 3 possessions per game with Blocks and Steals and lost 2,33 = 0,67 gain
Marvin gained 1,5 possessions per game with Blocks and Steals and lost 1,15 = 0,35 gain

Not a huge advantage.

In relation to Josh being a crowd favourite and ticket seller, I agree, but a winning team sells more tickets than a team with high flying circus acts which keep on loosing.

How many people went to the Hawks games when we did not even contend to be in playoffs and J-Smoove was smacking those rims like there was no tomorrow?

I agree that BBall is a show like any other, however, the most important element is winning and for that you need to make options which are not always popular. Look at the Pistons’ championship teams… was that entertaining from an aestetical point of view? No, but winning was.

GeeMack

August 13th, 2009
12:18 pm

Atlanta wants an NBA championship ASG. Please bring the players to ATL, so we can party down peachtree street. That would be one crazy parade. HAWKS 2010 NBA CHAMPS!

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
12:18 pm

niremetal, google pecking order.

Does jacking up 3’s and long range shots lead to better rebounding? Does the team moving to the right side of the court to provide space for the JJ iso lead to better rebounding?

Why does the front court have a much higher FG%? Could it be they shoot the ball closer to the basket? Marvin (because he drives the ball)Al and Josh should be our 1,2 and 3 option.

Rufus1

August 13th, 2009
12:28 pm

The Word Player

I think that Rod and the rest of you guys need to define what the word PLAYER means to you.

I don’t think Josh is a GOOD BASKETBALL PLAYER!!!!
He can’t DRIBBLE
He can’t SHOOT JUMP SHOTS OR FREE THROWS
Has a LOW BASKET BALL IQ
HE IS AN ATHLETE WHO PLAYS BASKETBALL..HE IS OUR BEST ATHLETE!
HE IS BE PAID, WITH THE HOPES OF TURNING INTO A GREAT BASKETBALL PLAYER!
HIS ATHLETIC ABILITY AND HUSTLE COVERS UP HIS BASKETBALL SHORTCOMINGS!

PS..He is a Great shot blocker

What everyone knows that under a different coach(Dale Brown) or system(Triangle) ROD would not have an argument about points or rebounds, be JOSH would not be the 2nd scoring option. TELL ME HOW MANY PLAYERS CAN YOU SAY CAN’T SHOOT, DRIBBLE, TURNOVER PRONE and LOW IQ, but make 10mil a year and get 30mins a night.

JOSH was lucky to get drafted by the right GM and have the right coach, because BK tried to trade for GERALD GREEN and we see his career.

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
12:35 pm

Getting fouled while driving and shooting over .500 at the FT line is still more productive than jacking up jumpers and shooting .437 or less like our back court does.

Doug

August 13th, 2009
12:39 pm

Rod: Folks are “incompetent” that don’t adhere to your cherry picking stats system of judging the worth of a player? Because some people understand that some players progress at different rates than others? Because some folks value things such as what type of teammate a player is?? Because some people can see the warts on BOTH players and not be blind to those on one and obsessed with those on the other? Again…and you have had no response…please don’t disappear when Marvin is widely recognized this year as one of the most improved players…as well as valuable secondary options in the league. Int he case of Josh…I would be happy if he could just become a shooter that did not elicit a groan from the crown whenever he hoisted up one of his missles. No one argues that Josh has an incredibly high ceiling…the question is will he ever come cls to that ceiling…will he mature in his UNDERSTANDING of the game and will he develop some facsimile of an outside shot?????

Rufus1

August 13th, 2009
12:42 pm

Kevin A

No..No it isn’T

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
12:56 pm

Rufus, Josh finishes off the fast break as well as anyone. He shoots a higher FG% than anyone on the team except AL. He is our leading shot blocker. Isn’t that basketball? How can someone that dumb be such a good player. As he gets older and his handle improves he will look smarter. If he added 500 more shot attempts (the same rate JJ shoots)maybe he would improve much faster.

Anakin Joe

August 13th, 2009
1:00 pm

KevinA, if on 100 possessions, a player is fouled and shoots 65% free throws, they will score 65. If a player makes 40% of their FGs in 100 possessions, they will score 80 points. 80>65.

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
1:03 pm

doc- no love on the Shuggie Otis call?

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
1:06 pm

Anakin Joe- I am in complete agreement with you on that last post, but you do have to factor in a value to fouls themselves. Getting the other team in foul trouble, causing defensive rotations, etc. Also, have some measurable value, which is probably best reflected in others shot %

Rufus1

August 13th, 2009
1:12 pm

KevinA

I am not a JOSH HATER!! I think his is overhyped, because he dunks. He is a great athlete and shot blocker and YES that is basketball, but he is our 2nd scoring option. I want him to be a great finisher, shot blocker, rebounder and shot 50%, but as our 4th or 5th scoring option. He has no defined offensive skill. I just think is playing the wrong role for his skill set, and the team suffer because of it.

We were last in 4th qt rebounding last year. If we are going to compete for a championship everyone needs to know their place. Josh is not a scorer.

Najeh Davenpoop

August 13th, 2009
1:24 pm

“I just think is playing the wrong role for his skill set, and the team suffer because of it. ”

Whose fault is that?

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
1:26 pm

Anakin,

That is true. And one’s, putting other teams in foul trouble, limiting the fast break opportunities for opponents, making the opposition work on defense are among other intangibles that come with getting fouled. We seem to play more aggressive on defense when we are driving and getting fouled.

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
1:28 pm

Wishing does not change anything but a Nash/Paul type PG would make Josh an all star in spite of his warts.

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
1:32 pm

just posted that same point Kevin

Mr. Phil

August 13th, 2009
1:36 pm

So have we given up on Flip Murray totally? Is that a dead issue?

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
1:37 pm

Rufus1, we just disagree. If JJ and Bibby had better skill sets at feeding the ball to Al/Josh/Marvin/ZaZa we would have a much better offense. What can I say other than I believe we have to potential to be a much better team playing inside out rather than outside in.

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
1:39 pm

yes, Mr. Phil

KevinA

August 13th, 2009
1:52 pm

Rufus1

KevinA

I am not a JOSH HATER!! I think his is overhyped, because he dunks.

I do not over hype Josh, in fact it may take this season and yet another for Josh and the rest of our young players to develop and go to the next level. None of our players are super stars including JJ who is a fringe all star.

Last year we saw spurts of better team play. This year and the next Woody and the back court need to work on style of play issues that involve the front court more.

doc

August 13th, 2009
2:26 pm

daniel sorry for the oversight, just thought you were relatin to my good bud and musician sautee.

Rufus1

August 13th, 2009
2:28 pm

KevinA

I agree that Woodson and this offense is the Problem. I HOPE IN THE END, I AM WRONG ABOUT JOSH!! I would love to have a home groan superstar.

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
2:48 pm

no worries doc… Have you heard Sharon Jones and the Dap Kings? They are a new group, but have that old soul vibe. Highly reccomended.

Blast

August 13th, 2009
3:10 pm

Lawd Have Mercy!

Blog is booooorrrring as hell!

If this is what we have to look forward to until training camp, until the season opener….. then I will go nuts! Marvin better than Josh? Josh more valuable than Marvin? Who gives a rat’s ass? They both play for the Hawks and are locked in for years to come!

doc

August 13th, 2009
3:14 pm

will check it out daniel, thanks.

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
3:19 pm

yes, Blast… we are in a sad, sad time of the year right now. I hope that get Joe Smith signed if just for nothing else than to give us somehting to opine about.

Crickets

August 13th, 2009
3:24 pm

chirp, chirp, chirp, etc., etc., ……

gwite

August 13th, 2009
3:35 pm

Well, the “latest” rumor is that Joe Smith will probably resign(as i reup) with Cleveland. He, like Ben Wallace, probably realizes that no one is probably going to offer much more than a minimum contract.

Stating the Obvious

August 13th, 2009
3:41 pm

Hard to tell what Rod is more full of…straw or bull$hit.

Joe Smith signed yet?

Anakin Joe

August 13th, 2009
3:42 pm

OK, I’ll take a stab at starting a new debate… top 5 PFs in Hawks history (I only go back about 25-30 years so feel free to offer up older names if you have them):


1. Kevin Willis
2. Christian Lattner
3. Dan Roundfield
4. Josh Smith
5. Shareef Abdur-Rahim

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
3:49 pm

Uh…Bob Pettit is #1. Not even close.

Melvin

August 13th, 2009
3:49 pm

Anakin,

I’m too young to remember Roundtree but I don’t like Lattner at number 2. Although he was a viable part of the Hawks team success in the 90’s…

Melvin

August 13th, 2009
3:50 pm

I meant Roundfield…. I guess I really showed my age…

doc

August 13th, 2009
3:52 pm

aj, bill bridges in there somewhere.

Mink

August 13th, 2009
3:54 pm

Our team is being structured to grow together. We STILL are a young team, but within two or three years, we’re going to be considered a veteran team with a core group of guys that, like the Pistons, will have played together for a long time.

Whether Woody is there or not, I expect the offense will flow smoothly and will actually have a rhythm to it. I agree that Crawford is going to have to be in the game in order to take some pressure off Joe and allow Joe more shots. Marvin’s ability to continue knocking down open jumpshots is going to make the difference between us being a 90 point per game team and a 100 point per game team.

Al has to develop a more consistent mid-range shot, but I think he and Smoove need to focus more on scoring junk baskets. With their leaping ability, they should be able to snag more offensive boards than any duo in the league.

Smoove needs to do one of two things. He needs to develop a jumper, and KEEP it developed, or he needs to abandon the long-range shot. Does he have no humility? How can you keep jacking up jumpers when you’re probably the worst shooting power forward in the league. That’s pretty sad in itself. He also needs to grow up, stop pouting at referees, and hustle. He and Tyrone Corbin are the only Hawks I’ve ever truly despised at times. Corbin was for the same lack of a jumpshot but keeps on jacking it up reason, but at least he didn’t have an attitude problem…

Let these guys develop, bring along a few right pieces over the years, and see what happens. It could be something great.

Oh, and let’s make the league’s “salary cap” an actual salary cap. None of this luxury tax garbage. Some teams are just getting TOO stacked.

Mink

August 13th, 2009
3:54 pm

Our team is being structured to grow together. We STILL are a young team, but within two or three years, we’re going to be considered a veteran team with a core group of guys that, like the Pistons, will have played together for a long time.

Whether Woody is there or not, I expect the offense will flow smoothly and will actually have a rhythm to it. I agree that Crawford is going to have to be in the game in order to take some pressure off Joe and allow Joe more shots. Marvin’s ability to continue knocking down open jumpshots is going to make the difference between us being a 90 point per game team and a 100 point per game team.

Al has to develop a more consistent mid-range shot, but I think he and Smoove need to focus more on scoring junk baskets. With their leaping ability, they should be able to snag more offensive boards than any duo in the league.

Smoove needs to do one of two things. He needs to develop a jumper, and KEEP it developed, or he needs to abandon the long-range shot. Does he have no humility? How can you keep jacking up jumpers when you’re probably the worst shooting power forward in the league. That’s pretty sad in itself. He also needs to grow up, stop pouting at referees, and hustle. He and Tyrone Corbin are the only Hawks I’ve ever truly despised at times. Corbin was for the same lack of a jumpshot but keeps on jacking it up reason, but at least he didn’t have an attitude problem…

Let these guys develop, bring along a few right pieces over the years, and see what happens. It could be something great.

Oh, and let’s make the league’s “salary cap” an actual salary cap. None of this luxury tax garbage. Some teams are just getting TOO stacked.

O'Brien

August 13th, 2009
4:15 pm

If I’m Sund, I would offer Joe Smith a 1 year deal thats above market value. Sure, we may be bidding against ourselves, and he would be the 2nd big off the bench, but right now, we need a backup PF, and he is the best available (in my opinion). Also, signing him would keep him away from Cleveland and the other good teams that may be interested in him.

The Hawks have 10 players under contract, and if Josh or Al gets injured, is anybody comfortable playing RandMo 20 mpg? Plus Joe Smith is a veteran and would probably be the best big man Josh has played with. Who knows, maybe Joe S could teach Josh a thing or two.

I dont understand what the hold up is. It sounds to me like Sund refuses to overpay, which is usually the right thing to do, but in this case, I think he should make an exception.

The Truth

August 13th, 2009
4:15 pm

gwite

Source

Anakin Joe

August 13th, 2009
4:24 pm

Melvin, Shaft was more of a SG… he was always shooting. (rim-shot please). :D

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
4:25 pm

Daniel

August 13th, 2009
4:27 pm

O brien- I agree with you, but I bet the hold up isn’t the money offered but the length of contract.

G-MAN

August 13th, 2009
4:30 pm

BA DA CHOO!

There you go AJ!:)

GeeMack

August 13th, 2009
4:30 pm

KevinA & Rufus1

I think the Hawks need to go more to the inside game. Therefore when we are getting creamed on defense by Bos, Cle, or Orl, we put some pressure on their interior defense to even the playing field. Al & JSmith can both be 15ppg & 10reb guys but they need more touches.

Also I think Woody is an excellent defensive coach that needs to hire an offensive minded assistance coach.

With all that said I do not believe the Hawks have the talent to get past the 2nd round. We are nowhere near as good as the top 3 teams in the east. Event the maturity of our young players. Know one the Hawks team will be a future HOF when they finish.

gwite

August 13th, 2009
4:41 pm

Truth,

As I said, it’s only a Yahoo sports “rumor”. Certainly not necessarily any “truth” to it.

But for me, hopefully Atlanta is wise enough to not be offering much more than minimum for him, and it looking at it rationally(form Joe’s viewpoint), we would need to put significantly more than Cleveland on the table.

gwite

August 13th, 2009
4:43 pm

Big Ray

August 13th, 2009
4:53 pm

“You are not going to help me understand the game of basketball trust me.”

Well there it is. Okay, we can stop trying to discuss things with Rod. When the man himself tells you it’s useless, do you need a better clue? This is still my favorite: “My info is based on facts (and stats).” Oh, that’s just too good…

I think Ariose has the best rebuttal, though:

” But if your opinion of Marvin is truly “based on stats, my knowledge of the game, and situations.” Then there is NO WAY you can be in your normal coherent state of mind and beleive that we didn’t need Marvin in the playoffs.”

Damn. That one hit so hard, I’ll bet Sam felt it all the way over there in the Swats …..

:twisted:

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
5:00 pm

AJ,

Bob Pettit
Bill Bridges (at 6′6″, 230 he AVERAGED 11.9 reb. for his career!)
Danny Rounds
Kevin Willis
Al Horford (yes that’s a projection)

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
5:04 pm

Ray,

You reckon those “stats” included Marvin falling down 60% of the time? ;-)

doc

August 13th, 2009
5:07 pm

yup figured another old timer might remember bridges. i would take him tomorrow for this team. he was a beast. sautee remember bells and bridges?

Big Ray

August 13th, 2009
5:13 pm

O’brien ,

Doesn’t that seem odd to you? The idea of Sund refusing to overpay for a big man? One of the biggest criticisms leveled at him when we learned he was to be our new GM, was the fact that he had a history of picking big men in the draft that never really panned out, then overpaying for veteran big men.

In fact, some of the same people who were only too quick to point those issues out are the EXACT same ones who are now saying that Sund is the reason why we don’t have a big man.

I find it strange that a man both known and criticized for having an apparent fetish for bigs is now the sole, or even main reason why this team has not signed one. Change a long-standing “MO” overnight? That’s about like the Hawks suddenly becoming a run-all-the-time, offense-first, defense-if we feel like it-team. Would you automatically say that this was Woody’s idea?

I’m not buying it…

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
5:17 pm

doc,

Yeah, but my enduring memory of Bells was how many of Pistol Pete’s perfect passes went of his fingertips. He DID take up space nicely.

Actually that’s not fair. Walt Bellamy was a VERY good center, a HOF’er who had a nice career. But by the time he came here he was on the downhill side.

What would we think of a center today averaging 20.1 and 13.7? (his career stats)

rgbutterfly

August 13th, 2009
5:26 pm

I don’t understand the Hawks complaining about “bigs” when they had one in David Anderson. He played in Europe.Yet the Hawks traded his rights to Houston for a 2nd round pick. Houston has signed him to a multi-year contract to become their center. What gives? I understand giving away a big yet complaining about not having enough bigs. The Hawks are playing the same ‘ole games of old-give away a needed player but compain about not having the enough quality players.

doc

August 13th, 2009
5:28 pm

sautee, yeah, not the best handle on stone hands and on the slide but he might have been the best hawk center of all time. konkak, tree? nope. oops i might start sounding like clyde ….. after fifty years have we got a real center yet? not in my lifetime.

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
5:31 pm

doc,

I don’t know if you’ll remember it, but I once told you a story of meeting Bridges when I was a teen and they had just come to Atlanta. Total class act.

He also blocked out better than ANYBODY I can remember except for Bill Russell. Which is why he rebounded so well at his size.

Hey, we should get Bridges to tutor J-Smash in blocking out!

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
5:36 pm

doc,

You MAY be right, but I’d put Deke ahead of Bells. No by much though.

newkid

August 13th, 2009
5:43 pm

RX for boring blog (maybe). Of the Hawks, Falcons, and Braves, who’s best positioned (considering current young talent and ability of GMs to add missing pieces) to get to the most finals (i.e., NBA, Super Bowl, or World Series) during the 5-year period 2010 through 2014 (inclusive)?

O'Brien

August 13th, 2009
5:44 pm

Ray,

I think Joe Smith is the one remaining big Woody really likes, and Sund does have a history of reaching (or overpaying) for big men. Those 2 factors combined would lead one to believe that (1) the ASG will not allow Sund to spend more than the minimum to round out our roster (currently at 10, but we will need at least 13) or (2) Joe Smith does not want to play for the Hawks.

Assuming we dont get Joe Smith, my guess is we will sign Siler, Hunter, and one more minimum wage guy.

Daniel,

If the hold up is length of contract, then offer Joe Smith a 2 year deal for slightly more than market price. As a veteran big man, he could help us on the court with this play and maybe he could help Josh as well. After all, the Hawks need all the big man coaching help they can get. (What has Ty Hill done?).

gwite

August 13th, 2009
5:46 pm

rgbutterfly,

We need a “big” that bangs, rebounds, and defends. Not one that hangs around the perimeter jacking up 3’s.

Ken Strickland

August 13th, 2009
7:20 pm

My list of top Hawks PF is as follows:
(1) Bob Pettit
(2) Paul Silas
(3) Truck Robinson
(4) Kevin Willis
(5) Dan Roundfield

The list isn’t in any particular order.

doc

August 13th, 2009
7:38 pm

ken you are old as dirt rocks and sand. you of all folks, how can you leave bridges off the list? heh heh

bridges came in from st louis didnt he?

Hoops

August 13th, 2009
8:07 pm

Daniel & O’Brien,

If Joe Smith will not sign a 1 year contract for 2M then the Hawks should offer him a 2 year contract for 1M per year. That should solve the problem!

A Thinking Fan

August 13th, 2009
8:46 pm

Anakin Joe that’s “Old School” – Donny Hathaway to Marvin Gaye, but the best music. By the way, “What’s Going On” with BASG & getting some Bigs?

I MUS WRITE

August 13th, 2009
9:10 pm

Cannibalism- and Rod from College Park is whats for dinner….

I MUS WRITE

August 13th, 2009
9:12 pm

Whass up Officer friendly …..

I MUS WRITE

August 13th, 2009
9:14 pm

Officer Friendly whatz happnin

Melvin

August 13th, 2009
9:26 pm

Welcome back MV7…..

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
9:38 pm

Najeh,

We can celebrate our boy Mike gettin’ back!

Paid the price, bein’ nice, and now we’ll see that talent again.

I hope the Iggles give him a good shot.

bigdave

August 13th, 2009
9:42 pm

good luck Mike…!!!

Sautee

August 13th, 2009
9:44 pm

doc,

Bridges grew up in New Mexico and went to Kansas. They retired his jersey.

Drewscrilla

August 13th, 2009
9:55 pm

Vick just signed a 2 year deal with philly

Steve

August 13th, 2009
9:58 pm

Looks like the Cavs may get Joe Smith – on to Rob Kurz….

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
9:59 pm

Lol…I guess I can’t escape Vick no matter where I move, huh? Plays for the Falcons, goes to prison in northern VA after I move to DC, and now he’s in Philly.

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
10:00 pm

Lol…I guess I can’t escape Vick no matter where I move, huh? Plays for the Falcons, gets locked up in VA after I move to DC, and now he’s coming to Philadelphia.

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
10:00 pm

Whoops, sorry about that. Thought my first one got rejected

Stewart

August 13th, 2009
10:06 pm

Anyone know what the league minimum salary is? That would be for non-veteran or players in their first 2 to 3 yrs. Asking for the guys that are likely to finish up the roster.. Siler, Hunter, Korolev. Could these guys get like 300k to 600k at the minimum?

Mystikal

August 13th, 2009
10:09 pm

Congrats to Mike Vick!! But we’ll be ready to whup that a$$ on Dec. 6th

Big Ray

August 13th, 2009
10:12 pm

O’brien,

Those are the conclusions I’ve been drawing….

Big Ray

August 13th, 2009
10:16 pm

IMUS,

What’s good?

I see MV is back on the NFL scene. Hopefully he does well enough to earn a contract after this two year deal is over. Maybe his story doesn’t end in total tragedy. Hope not. I’m betting Vick is more sick of hearing about redemption than anybody else, and is just ready to play some football. Best of luck, dude. But like Mystikal said, we WILL be aiming at whippin’ that ass when we meet.

Mystikal

August 13th, 2009
10:23 pm

Has JOe Smith signed with somebody? or is it just bored ppl playing jokes again.

The Truth

August 13th, 2009
10:47 pm

gwite

From reading that Yahoo version of the latest of the Joe Smith Watch, I got the impression it really wasn’t anything new they reported. They just spun the same story in a different way. Since Sund has completely struck-out in the free agency game up to now (outside of our FAs), there is no logical reason to expect this outcome will be any different. If I could compare Sund to a basketball player, I would characterized him as being a player who shows flashes of greatness at times but is a weak finisher around the rim.

As I wrote previously about the contest between the Cavs and Hawks for Joe Smith, if the issue is about money, we should win that battle relative to the L. Tax. Since both teams have similar challenges resigning their star player, we’ll call that even. If the issue is the pursuit of a title, then the Cavs should win since they have a stockpile of quality players and a final contender. Let’s say at this point it’s a draw. Then the final decisive factor is playing time. Since they would have 3 backup PF including the acquisition of Moon and Powe, it would seem to me that Joe would see far-less playing time then he saw last year with the Cavs. I think we would win the playing time battle because Joe Smith would be the first off the bench to spell both Josh and Marvin. So if we have won 2 out of 3 of these battles, WHY CAN’T SUND CLOSE THE DEAL?

Is this about Joe Smith or is it about Sund? Or perhaps neither; it could be about Joe playing for Woody. The speculation continues. One thing is obvious, when this drama is over, it would be wise for Sund to clear the air with a press conference. Otherwise, this speculation will have a full set of legs and a lot of juice.

doc

August 13th, 2009
10:52 pm

sautee, i meant didnt he play in st louis before they came here in 66?

Steve

August 13th, 2009
11:02 pm

Hawks at about 63m in salaries for this year – can’t go over luxury tax line of 69+m set by ASG. This leaves around 6m for the 3-5 remaining players we will sign. Joe Smith only made 1.2m last year. He may have a great agent, basing his value on the Cavs 1st round playoff series. Can’t see him making over 2m per annum over 2 years – I would rather get Rusk or the OKC center than over pay for Smith. On the other hand, I think Smith the elder could teach Smith the younger a few things, and probably Al, ZaZa, RandMo, Garrett, and Hunter as well.

I’m still wondering if we sign Flip and West, and let Gardner go, or just how that will play out. If we sign Flip, practice squad will most likely be West or Gardner, Othello and Siler. Sounds good to me.

Steve

August 13th, 2009
11:07 pm

P.S. I hope we didn’t blow it letting Solomon go – and I also know signing Flip is probably just wishful thinking…

The Truth

August 13th, 2009
11:11 pm

Steve

Not bad, not at all; Exactly that sounds pretty dam good

ILL-logical

August 13th, 2009
11:20 pm

RX for boring blog (maybe). Of the Hawks, Falcons, and Braves, who’s best positioned (considering current young talent and ability of GMs to add missing pieces) to get to the most finals (i.e., NBA, Super Bowl, or World Series) during the 5-year period 2010 through 2014 (inclusive)?

1. The Falcons. The NFL “assists” its franchises in the process of making playoff apperances, especially in the major media centers. But the Falcons also have the best front office in town so they are the number 1 candidate for an eventual championship.

2. The Hawks. In the next 2 years, the coaching and the front office issues will be solved. And the team identity will be completely different. IF Josh, Teague and Al /Marvin remain, that core should be able to go a long, long way. Maybe to the top.

#. The Braves will never see another World Serise, let alone win one as long as any vestige of the JS era remains. IF they surround this young guy Heywood with talent, without regard to any other considerations, they may be very good for a very long time. But I wouldn’t bet on that.

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
11:35 pm

The luxury tax line is $69M, but keep in mind that most teams stay $1-2M under that level so that they have room to sign free agents down the stretch, either because of injuries or because a good player that the team wants is waived/released midseason. The Spurs did that this past year with Drew Gooden, for instance.

niremetal

August 13th, 2009
11:39 pm

That being said, signing Smith to a one-year deal at a few hundred grand above the minimum should be a no-brainer. My guess is that Joe Smith is holding out for a 2-year deal, which Sund rightfully is nervous about giving him since we’ll need all the money we can get if we want to extend Joe and/or try to trade for a marquee player next summer.

cp

August 13th, 2009
11:54 pm

I wonder when the Vick jerseys will go on sale. I truly hope he finally gets it and turns his life around. He has too many people in his corner who wants him to succeed in life forget the football aspect…..Sign Joe Smith already and lets get this season started.

Mystikal

August 13th, 2009
11:56 pm

Hey Ill, i’m definitely with you on the Falcons contending. They surely have the best front office personnel and think it will mainly come down to them staying healthy (easier said then done) as they continue to get better. For the hawks, I think it’s just wishful thinking to believe the ownership debacle will be solved anytime soon, but we definitely can upgrade the coach. If we can get a coach who properly uses our athleticism to get out and run along with developing players than they’ll be headed in the right direction as well. Co-sign Braves

Ken Strickland

August 14th, 2009
12:13 am

DOC-forgive me my friend. I didn’t think of Bill Bridges until after I’d posted my list. I believe he did come over from St Louis, along with LWilkins, JCaldwell, ZBeatty and maybe PSilas.

I could be wrong, naturally, but I think Joe Smith has made the Hawks his #1 priority, as long as the numbers can be worked out. Considering what he did last yr, especially in the playoffs, I can’t believe his services aren’t wanted by any team besides the Hawks. With his versatility, and being a very experienced vet, he knows Woodson will give him consistent mins.

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
12:26 am

As I see it, Mo Evans becomes expendable if Joe Smith is signed. So, one option to free-up cash (2.5M) to help the resigning of JJ, would be to trade Evans to a expiring contract since his current contract has another year with a player option. If that happens, the 2.5M becomes available for JJ when his extension kicks-in 2010 season. Of course this scenario only works if such an opportunity presents itself.

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
12:38 am

Ummm….would I be wrong to get a MV7 Philly Jersey? I’m afraid I might get murked by a few PETA members if I do….or some angry unreasonable Falcon/Matty ice supporters….

Ray, LOL@ 4:53pm post.

Also, you ALL are delsional. Obinna Okezie was CLEARLY the greatest PF to don a Hawks jersey….

Mystikal

August 14th, 2009
12:48 am

Trade Mo for Brandon Wright, Kurt THomas, or Josh Boone!

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
12:50 am

I wish Vick the best. I hope he can get his personal life together and keep it that way….hopefully the wounded bitd will take fligh once again……but we pluckin’ his feathers on Dec 6th…. :twisted:

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
12:53 am

*hopefully the wounded bird will take flight once again

Man, If we could get Boone for Mo and then Resign flip….nasty lineup….just filthy sick….

MAC-TOWN

August 14th, 2009
1:09 am

Bibby = Can shoot…..but no defense……no ability to quickly penetrate to the hole for the deuce/get fouled and go to the line/and-1. Since he lacks the ability to penetrate, that means no penetration and kick outs.

Teague cant be any worse than bibby at any of those things….except shooting…so if Teague comes in and displays he has the ability to knock down long range shots consistently…..

I think he will take alot of Bibby’s minutes. It’s not hard to imagine that Teague has a good chance of taking Bibby’s job

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
1:19 am

I know Mo gets a lot of hate around here, but he’s actually a pretty solid player. I’d give him up for a big man who would play the same minutes, sure, but he has a relatively consistent three point shot and gives full effort. You kind of forget that he’s there sometimes, but his motor never stops. I remember he was still playing all-out (along with Othello, Acie, and Gardner) in that “garbage time” blowout in Game 2. You can never have too many of those types on your team, even if he is a tweener swingman…

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
1:23 am

Nire, I love mo, really…..but If the right deal comes along…Obviously Joshe Boone isn’t that guy, but If it means hringing Flip back hehehe….j/k

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
1:24 am

BTW the “nasty lineup….just filthy sick…” OBVIOUSLY Wasn’t for Boone lol ;-)

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
1:38 am

Ariose

That’s not an outrageous idea at all since Boone salary averages about the same as Mo Evans over the same 2 yr term. However his contract does not expires next year since he has a qualifying offer next year. As stated to help free up cash for Joe. Also, Boone free-throw shooting would be a serious down grade for us since he only shoots 37.6% vs. 82.2% for Evans. I can live with that if we can get these deals done.

Clyde

August 14th, 2009
5:06 am

Vick will get a ring this year. Week 12 will be interesting.

JSS

August 14th, 2009
6:35 am

Well you know what will be NBC’’s “FLEX” game on December 6th… Greeting from Berlin on the eve of the World Track and Field Championships… I won’t bore all of you B-Ballers with a update from here. But to say the least, Bolt-vs-Gay on Day 2 is groiwng on the edge of being something just South of the Batttle at Gettysburg…

By the way, S.A.R. should never appear on a list of anything considered “best.” Shoot, Don Adams was a better PF than S.A. Rahim… Mike Sojourner was a better PF than S.A. R.
Bob Petit (is, was, and will always be A BASKETBALL GOD), but he was St. Louis Hawk)

1. Roundfield (most consistent on both ends)
2. Bill Bridges (Too bad most of you never saw him)
3. Len “TRUCK” Robinson (The Big Throwback, the best rent a player trade this franchise ever
made)
4. Paul Silas (3rd worst trade in Hawks history, combined with “Bells” made up for Lou
Hudson’s misdadventures…
5. Kevin Willis (The Black Hole, once the ball went into the post, it never reemerged)

Well, time for lunch… Have a great weekend… You can catch the meet online on the BBC, CBC, and Universal Sports except when NBC and Versus are broadcasting…

JSS

August 14th, 2009
6:42 am

Oh, since the AJC doesn’t seem to support local athletes.
Here’s your local athletes to keep an eye on and hopefully cheer on:
Men’s Team
Angelo Taylor (Fayetteville, GA) 400IM, 4×400M relay
Terrence Trammell (Atlanta, Ga.) 110 MH, 4×100M relay
Travis Padgett (Marietta, Ga.) 4×100M relay
Keith Moffatt (Atlanta, Ga.) High Jump
Dwight Philips (Snellville, GA) Long Jump
Kenta Bell (Atlanta, GA) Triple Jump
Reese Hoffa (Athens, Ga.) Shot Put
Adam Nelson (Charlottesville, VA, but a UGA grad and Atlanta native) Shot Put
Chris Hill (Athens, GA) Javelin

Women’s Team
Chaunte Howard (Snellville, Ga.) High Jump

doc

August 14th, 2009
7:45 am

ken you know i am just playing and know we are peers.

really glad to see bridges get some respect.

zelmo might have been our best ever if he had stayed but as hawks fans arent we always talking about what might have been.

Hoops

August 14th, 2009
8:08 am

Mark Blount is probably going to be waived by the Timberwolves after being traded by the Heat for Q Richardson. Blount is 33 year’s old and is 7″0″. If Joe does not sign, this might be an option.

dap01

August 14th, 2009
8:22 am

If we can sign a useful big man to back up our bigs (Smith) and if Teague is mature enough to play HIS game (and Woody is able to let him play) we could grow alot.

If we sit back and hoist 3’s (Woody’s and Bibby’s game) we will stagnate.

Melvin

August 14th, 2009
8:27 am

The Timberwolves are expected to waive Mark Blount. Can we at least sign him. I have lost hope in signing Joe Smith.

Daniel

August 14th, 2009
8:35 am

I want to throw out the name Tyrone Corbin. Certainly not a top 5 PF, but maybe the most unattractive person I have ever seen.

Sautee

August 14th, 2009
8:45 am

R.I.P. Les Paul.

Did more to change popular music than ANYBODY.

Invented the electric guitar and had a large hand in developing multi-track recording.

And played a regular Monday night gig (at age 94!) until just a few weeks ago.

ILL-logical

August 14th, 2009
9:31 am

JSS: Thanks for the Track and Field info, I’m a big fan.

Suatee: Thanks for the Les Paul shotout, he now joins the big jam session in the sky. Rashid Ali, former Coltrane drummer par excelance recently joined that goup as well.

I am stubbornly clinging to the notion that hiring Antonio Davis as a big man “consultant” is just as important as signing Joe Smith, if not more so.

vava74

August 14th, 2009
9:46 am

ILL-Logical,

Antonio Davis was a banger which is something you can’t teach.

You either have that in you or you don’t. Hence, how could he help teaching our bigs? Eventually only on the defensive end (were to put your hands in the back of the guy posting you, or where to position your feet defensively)…

We need someone that teaches them post moves. J-Smoove learned a couple with Hakeem but doesn’t use them consistently.

Al needs to learn his post moves as well pronto… if he does, I am happy with him at the 5 spot.

Daniel

August 14th, 2009
10:16 am

Sautee- Thanks for the reminder. RIP Les Paul

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
10:56 am

Antoine Carr for big man coach (as if y’all haven’t heard me say that before). I wish I had seen this Bill Brdiges play, sounds like a unanimous nomination. That list certainly brought out the “old heads”. Cool stuff.

Mark Blount? I guess, but dude has previously suffered from reboundphobia… a fear of going after missed shots. I’m not entirely sure I wouldn’t take Jason Collins before Blount.

I’m happy for Vick but I’m a Falcons fan. And I just can’t see any true Falcons fan putting on another team’s colors, I don’t care whose name is on the back. I wonder how many would wear a Josh Smith jersey if he were sent to another team? I know that I would gladly purchase a Jamal Crawford jersey if he were traded to another team (in the next 18 months) :twisted:

Hoops

August 14th, 2009
11:07 am

I wonder if the Warriors would trade Ronny Turiaf for Mo Evans and R. Morris. Biedrins, Maggette, Wright, & Randolph will probably play in front of him. That will save them .8M as well.

Turiaf would give us that bruiser off the bench in place of Morris.

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
11:18 am

Hoops, trade Mo straight up for craig Smith. He has an expiring contract and also makes $2.5M. And the Clips could use Mo to deal with the numerous SGs in their division.

Hoops

August 14th, 2009
11:22 am

Anakin Joe,

Sounds good to me. I bet you are starting to wonder if we are going to be able to sign Joe Smith as well. I’m starting to doubt that it’s going to happen. Craig Smith plays hard. A little undersized, but you can’t measure a guys heart!

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
11:27 am

AJ

I like that deal also. Why don’t give Sund a call :)

Melvin

August 14th, 2009
11:42 am

Hoops,

I think Joe Smith is an after thought as well. I don’t agree with those that say we shouldn’t bid against ourselves only b/c we are in need of his talents and vet savvy then any other playoff team.

Ken Strickland

August 14th, 2009
11:48 am

DOC-after taking that trip down memory lane, I realized just how talented that team was when it came to Atlanta. Jumping Joe Caldwell, Zelmo Beatty, Lenny Wilkins, Bill Bridges, Paul Silas, and then we added LHudson, and do you remember Walt Hazzard. The whole team fell apart when we signed Pistol Pete Maravich. The vets couldn’t deal with the Hawks willingness to pay an unproven rookie so much more money than they were paying them. They also couldn’t adjust to Pete’s wide open style of play, so they bolted.

ANAKIN JOE-Mo Evans also has an expiring contract, so where’s the advantage? We already know what we have with Evans, and we won’t have to deal with any possible adjustment or chemistry problems, or the WOODY FACTOR, if we retain him.

dap01

August 14th, 2009
12:03 pm

Having David Anderson would be better than a future #2 at this point. Maybe Sund has a plan.

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
12:07 pm

Ken Strickland

Mo Evans contract includes this upcoming season and a player option year for 2010. That Player Option gives Mo the right to invoke the option year and play through 2010 which is also the year JJ extension kicks end if they can work it out.

kwooden1

August 14th, 2009
12:09 pm

I hope that report about Joe Smith is none sense, watching the second to last regular season game of the Hawks vs Cleveland again showed me Joe’s value! Joe, can play inside and out. He’s not a true banger, buts he’s willing to mix it up. Which is fine because Zaza can be the real banger and Joe can concentrate on scoring. Personally I don’t want to go into the season with Morris and ??Siler as our backup PF/C.

Earlier this summer I thought we should upgrade Mo, but after re-watching games my opinion has changed. Mo is tweener, but he was asked to guard the other teams best player all the time, whether they were PG/SG or SF. He got beat a lot, but everyone gets beat a lot against great players, but Mo makes defenses adjust because of his ability to shoot the 3. I have a better appreciation for his toughness and his athleticism watching the games again. We need to add another big, not trade a productive player for an unknown commodity.

I still believe that SUND is going to get it done with Joe Smith and then we can wait until training camp to see what we really have!

GO HAWKS!!

darrell starks

August 14th, 2009
12:16 pm

What is all this talk about non productive wash up 34 year old joe smith can some 1 explain 2 me what have he done thru out his nba career.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Daniel

August 14th, 2009
12:56 pm

darrell- Joe Smith is not a washed up non-productive player. Is he an All-Star? no, but that is not what we need or are looking for. He is a savvy vet who keeps in great shape (very few injuries) who is comfortable coming off the bench. He would provide leadership and depth to this team. Remember how important having a veteran bench was last year with the difference that Flip and Mo had on the team. Don’t you want a front court player like Flip? (not that he plays like Flip)

Daniel

August 14th, 2009
12:57 pm

A bench of Crawford, Teague, Mo, Joe Smith and Za would be a pretty nice 2cd unit.

doc

August 14th, 2009
1:48 pm

right ken, couldnt remember jumpin joe, it wasnt just the pistol but a new league to contend with. cost us a few great players including thompson from nc state? it was a very good team and maybe the best ever if kept together. maybe this crew we have now will meet those expectations now that the nucleus is kept. good work sund.

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
2:06 pm

To some, Vick represented more then just a Falcon Player; he represented a movement, a protest statement. I can easily envision all kinds of twisted anti-type Vick Jerseys that would sell like hot-cakes.

I got the impression from Sekou last comment that Sund is 100% working on the JJ extension these days. One could wonder has negotiation ended between the Hawks and Joe Smith or have talks subsided. Has a final offer been made would be my question? If so, then the outcome maybe resting in Joe Smith hands.

I MUS WRITE

August 14th, 2009
2:39 pm

I hope we are’nt serious about Mark Blount…. I would have rather kept Solo. Blount is a 7ft jump shooter =he will not help with defending the paint and post scoring – If we are now at the bottom of the barrel then Petro would be my choice……..
Should have signed Hollins IMO

Hoops =We have like minds I swear…. Turiaf would be a great fit for us,I love his hustle and gritty play. Brandon Wright is intriguing to me, He has a nice game -I just think he’s in the wrong system……….

I wonder if GS would take R.Morris for Wright -probably not but I want that stiff off our bench along with Gardner and Hunter. Can we get some guys that can actually play to fill out the bench…….

Gerald Green comes to mind as well as Craig Smith -they wont play alot anyway and we upgrade for roughly the same money.

Congrats to Vick….glad he didnt sign in our division-i thought he was going to the Panthers….. Whew !!!

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
2:46 pm

I can’t believe I’m about to write this, but, if Mark Blount is waived (which is being speculated), the Hawks should give Joe Smith an ultimatum and if he doesn’t get off the pot, get a deal done with Blount. I think that I have decided that a back-up big who can defend pick-and-roll is more important than a big who can defend the post. And Blount, if nothing else, is agile for a big guy and can “get in the way”. And I’m fearful that we truly may end up with someone like Loren “Gulp” Woods or Sene Saer or some other walking and breathing disaster. Lastly, Blount & Zaza seem like they could coexist on the floor together better than Zaza and Jason Collins (IMO).

Talk about deciding between the lesser of impossibly ugly evils… WHEW!

Melvin

August 14th, 2009
2:50 pm

Imus, at this point I would welcome Blount with open arms. As for Vick, the Panthers missed a golden opportunity. He would have brought excitement and fans to the stadium in Carolina. What the heck kind of incriminating evidence that Jake Delhomme have on the franchise is what I want to know. Not only did they not sign a replacement for Delhomme (after his dismal 5 interceptions in a playoff game), they rewarded him with a contract extension….DAH

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
2:54 pm

I MUS,

1) Blount is a 7ft jump shooter =he will not help with defending the paint and post scoring…
2) Should have signed Hollins IMO

Care trying to square 1 and 2? Hollins is a 7-footer who can’t even shoot jumpers. He’s athletic but he weighs less than Dennis Scott’s big toe and gets backed down with sickening ease by even mediocre big men. He wouldn’t have helped our defense one damned bit.

I’m not picking on you specifically. But I’ve gotten tired of all the “we need someone to help with interior D” posts that include suggestions of signing people who wouldn’t have done jack to help with our interior D (Hollins, Warrick, Channing Frye, etc).

Besides, we’re looking to sign a 10th man, not a top-8 rotation player. And frankly, I’d rather have Joe Smith for 1 year at $1.5M than Hollins for 3 years at $7M. After a year, everyone would be slamming Sund for signing a scrub playing 12 minutes a game to a 3-year contract and calling for us to trade Hollins for yet another mediocre big man. Hell, people are already doing that for Mo, and he plays 23 quality minutes per game.

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
2:58 pm

nire, I think people (at least me) are thinking that Mo is less effective at SF and with 4 guards likely earning consistent minutes (3 for sure and hopefully Teague), it feels like Evans is “expendable” and could be used to bring in a comparable player who has the size to make a different type of contribution. Plus, in the case of Craig Smith, we get the benefit of an expiring contract, which as you know, is something that we likely need next summer.

Ken Strickland

August 14th, 2009
3:05 pm

THE TRUTH-thanks for the update on Mo Rvans contract. I guess that can be an advantage in the trade suggested by ANAKIN JOE.

DOC-don’t forget, in addition to losing Joe Caldwell and David Thompson to the ABA, we also lost Marvin “THE HUMAN ERASER” Webster. We actually had Julius Erving under contract that same yr, but chickened out when the ABA threatened to sue the Hawks for doing what they had already done to the Hawks, as well as other NBA teams. Man, imagine a roster comprised of JErving, LHudson, DThompson, MWebster, JDrew, THenderson, DMeminger, TVArsdale, Connie Hawkins and BWilloughby. Three of these players were listed in the NBA’s alltime top 50 players.

doc

August 14th, 2009
3:09 pm

ken, didnt we lose zelmo too to the aba, like to denver?

Melvin

August 14th, 2009
3:13 pm

Anakin,
Agreed with your last post.

Nire,
Are you going to discredit every big man that’s suggested with the simple reason that the Hawks have their top 8 rotational players? If you believe our top 8 are championship caliber than I can understand your logic but if not, than why shouldn’t the BASG/Sund not look to explore ways of improving the team (top 8 included)?

gwite

August 14th, 2009
3:16 pm

To Utah. Gee, even back then we couldn’t get, or keep players.

Must have been the “Woodson factor”. lol

doc

August 14th, 2009
3:20 pm

yup gwite, knew it was west. should have remembered (mis-remembereing comes with old age and roids) because i can still see him in that uniform. i think he had a pretty good career there, solid if not great.

newkid

August 14th, 2009
3:28 pm

doc, what do you make of the national debate we’re having on health care reform?

Yahoo

August 14th, 2009
3:50 pm

Melvin

Nire is just upset because he didn’t think of the idea first. If he doesn’t control the flow of this blog, then he pouts like a spoil child.

Daniel

August 14th, 2009
4:03 pm

gwite- that 3:16 post is hilarious. good one.
Well, guys I got nothing to add to the conversation at this point. Oh, these August days. Maybe the Joes will get done this weekend?!?
got the Phils and Braves to watch.
Everyone be safe. Catch you on the flip side.

BrittishAnger

August 14th, 2009
4:45 pm

Losing Andersen for a future number two is once again the Ricky Sund “If All Else Fails” strategy we’re seeing in action. I’ve stated before picking up Crawford is as much a hedge bet against losing JJ next season as it is to reduce his playing time to deter mid-season fatigue, just like resigning Bibby was an insurance policy for Teague if things weren’t to work out with him. We run risk of losing JJ, Mo Evans, and Randolph Morris next season (and maybe even Horford), so coming into next years draft with enough picks to reduce some of those losses (preferably just Evans and Morris) is a wise move on Sund’s part, especially since 2nd round picks can be signed to deals without having to break the bank on a few replacement back-ups, considering the assumed drop in Salary Cap next year. I’d agree to having Andersen backing us up rather than that insurance policy, but considering the profit-centric thought process from those above ol’ Ricky Sundries, and the lack of interest Andersen had in playing with us to begin with, so long as we don’t blow those picks we’ll walk away from next summer with a few sighs of relief….

BrittishAnger

August 14th, 2009
4:47 pm

Speaking of Aussies and Atlanta, who was the kid who used to play with Ga. Tech, the red headed lanky guy they had a few seasons back?

Ken Strickland

August 14th, 2009
4:54 pm

DOC-we must have lost him to the NBA because I don’t remember him playing for any other NBA team and he definitely didn’t play for us any longer.

People, I think we can forget all of this talk about trading this player for that player. Unless we lose out on signing JSmith, we can probably forget about any further significant moves. If we carry only 13 players, like most teams, and since we already have 10 players under contract, there will be only 3 open roster spots available. Also, if we sign Siler, like most of us have suggested, there will be only 2 roster spots available.

O'Brien

August 14th, 2009
5:01 pm

BrittishAnger,

I think you’re talking about Luke Schensher.

I agree with AJ. Mo Evans is the most expendable, because he is most effective as backup SG, which is the role that Crawford will fill. Plus Evans is too small (6′5″) to be effective as a backup SF. And, JJ can provide some backup minutes at SF when he and Crawford are on the court together.

It bothers me that the Hawks only have 10 men signed so far, because it looks more and more like they will sign minimum wage guys (Siler, Hunter etc) to fill out the roster. And when Cleveland, Orlando and Boston have deep frontcourts, Siler and RandMo are not going to cut it.

Big Ray

August 14th, 2009
5:20 pm

Sssnnzzzzzzz…..

Astro Joe is right about Evans…

Snnzzzzzzzz……..

Doug

August 14th, 2009
6:52 pm

ESPN saying Hawks have signed Joe Smith!!!

JSS

August 14th, 2009
6:52 pm

Midnight here in the German Capital, thanks ILL… the website for Canadian Broadcasting is http://www.cbcsports.ca and the BBC is http://www.bbc.co.uk. Please remember that there is a 6 hour time difference. Day one will have some local interest with Reese Hoffa and Adam Nelson dueling in the Shot…Heats for the men 100M will start at 6AM Atlanta… The Quarterfinals commence at 11:50AM Atlanta time… Another local 400IM hurdler Angelo Taylor hits the track in the evening session at around 2:20PM Atlanta time. For any middle and long distance running fans, 1500M heats for men open the evening session. If the American men are going to advance and be a factor, we’ll find out early, The Women’s 10K will start around 3:25Pm Atlanta. There is a chance 6 to 10 women may run below 30 minutes!

Well I hope that helps, we get to see Bolt, Gay, Powell, and all the biggies on Day 1 twice… The time get some sleep…

hawksfan

August 14th, 2009
7:01 pm

Joe Smith signed with the Hawks…you heard it here first!

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
7:02 pm

Doug,

Link? Or is it on TV?

Doug

August 14th, 2009
7:03 pm

Ric Bucher ESPN news TV

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
7:06 pm

And my point is simply that as long as the Hawks sign Joe Smith, Brian Skinner, Adonal Foyle, or someone of that ilk, we’ll be fine, and we’ll be fine without having tied up millions of dollars in multi-year contracts that everyone will be bitching about come next summer when we realize that signing those players makes it impossible to keep JJ and/or trade for another marquee player without going into the luxury tax.

I’d rather have Joe Smith or Adonal Foyle and $2M more in flexibility next summer than a signing a multiyear-contract for someone who will be no better than Solo.

Doug

August 14th, 2009
7:07 pm

Hopefully Bucher is correct…good, quality professional. Then , let Siler-Morris battle….sign either a 3rd point guard (Hart) or a quality swing (Carney)…add a couple developmental types and you have a good roster…probably a 4 seed roster in the East!

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
7:12 pm

And that SI article is trash. Al Horford’s strength is in deficit? Since when? He can outmuscle all but 3-4 of the starting centers in the league.

Doug

August 14th, 2009
7:12 pm

Running out for evening…niremetal…hopeully again story is correst..check later!

Mystikal

August 14th, 2009
7:46 pm

Where is this news about Joe Smith coming from?? a website, espn ticker?

Please do not even joke about Mark Blount, he has wasted so much time and money over the years. May appease now, but we’d be pissed down the road.

Mystikal

August 14th, 2009
7:54 pm

Ok, just seen it on espn ticker that Hawks have signed Joe Smith. Guessing we’re gonna have to wait til Monday to get some real confirmation. OH SEKOU…

Melvin

August 14th, 2009
7:58 pm

I just saw the on ESPN new that Joe Smith signed a 1yr deal with the Hawks…. Couldn’t help but laugh as the news anchor (don’t know his name) said this signing just put the Hawks over the top… I hope its true…LOL

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
8:07 pm

Until I hear it from a source other than ESPN (which bats about .200 when it comes to Hawks transactions), I will assume it’s not true.

Melvin

August 14th, 2009
8:09 pm

Mystikal,

If its true, I’m sure Sekou will write an article and blog about the signing…

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
8:12 pm

From Sekou’s Twitter page: sekousmith01Spoke w/2 Hawks sources about Joe Smith: looks good, but nothing concrete yet. Final process begins Monday. Another Hawks’ score. Stay tuned
2 minutes ago from web

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
8:14 pm

The link for those who like to see it for themselves.

http://twitter.com/sekousmith01

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
8:16 pm

This could be BIG, BIG, BIG. But Portland thought that they had Hedo all locked up, so I’ll wait before popping open the champagne. But I’ve got it chilling in the ice bucket.

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
8:18 pm

Well let’s keep our fingers crossed. Sund has a pretty long track record of making solid August signings, so I wouldn’t be surprised. But until Sekou says something more than “the process will be finalized,” I’ll hold back my enthusiasm.

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
8:28 pm

nire

Where is this SI article you mentioned

niremetal

August 14th, 2009
8:34 pm

The Truth,

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/steve_aschburner/08/14/hawks/

I mean it’s no surprise that the press still hates on the Hawks. But that doesn’t make it much less annoying to read it.

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
8:44 pm

Hopefully we can get Joe Signed.

……ALL These other NFL fans better lay off vick this season. We Falcon fans are the ONLY one with the right to boo his arse. He let us down. Do you know how hard it is to watch his highlight reel on ESPN??? I’m having vick withdrawel symptoms. I love Matt Ryan, I even Followed him when he was at BC, but it’s MV7 man…..It’ll pass as soon as they stop freaking showing his clips on ESPN…..

tale of woe

August 14th, 2009
8:45 pm

Just announced Joe has signed with the HAWKS!

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
8:50 pm

….anyhoo, I havve a feeling were taking the NFC south this season. Gonzo+Ice+Turner+Norwood+White=Nasteh Offense

I’m just not so sure about our defense…

I don’t understand why rick wouldn’t sign Joe Smith to a two year deal? That way, we could trade him next offseason. Now he just gets to walk after this season…..ugh…..

……and Flips camp is talking to the Heat(per Hoopsworld). Mimai and Philly were the two teams I DIDN’T want him talking to. Talk about a nightmare. Those teams give us enough trouble as it is…

The Truth

August 14th, 2009
8:50 pm

nire

Agreed. This guy sounds like he’s done nothing more than been an anonymous blog reader who has been eavesdropping in our blogging conversation and forming an opinion. Who ever is paying his salary is wasting their money.

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
9:07 pm

The nuggets re-signed Anthony Carter… thats three PG’s now AND a rookie (Lawson) who needs time.

The Jazz re-signed Ronnie Price….to Go along with Deron Williams……the Rookie Eric Maynor still needs time

The Lakers have three PG’s

You KNOW where i’m going with this….

Ariose

August 14th, 2009
9:09 pm

Nire, Agreed.

Anakin Joe

August 14th, 2009
9:42 pm

Trade Jamal Crawford for Salim Stoudemire!

I MUS WRITE

August 14th, 2009
9:45 pm

Yeah Melvin…Delhome was a mess in that playoff game one of the worst performances I’ve seen. Meltdown- he was awful but got a nice fat extension. Must be some kind of voo doo….Wish i could get the recipe to sprinkle in my bosses coffee.

Nir- We keep say’n it becuz its true!… I mean the guy signed for 1 mill -Hell why not? Young athletic rangey guy with nice athleticism….Why not? The way i see it Morris makes 800k and Hollins would be a big upgrade for pennies on the dollar.

So what if he’s thin,so is KG. THAT WAS ONLY A COMPARISON OF BODY TYPES NOT ACTUAL GAME.He played well for Dallas the second half of last year. I actually saw the guy give Tim Duncan some problems in the post. Active around the rim….Blocks a good bit of shots too.
I would take him over Solo Hunter Blount Boone Morris ETC… I think he’s just as good as Tyson Chandler who will get exposed this year without Paul…Met both of them and they are roughly the same height and weight so ???

KWOODEN1 where are you watching those games?

I MUS WRITE

August 14th, 2009
10:00 pm

Sekou is at Strokers making it rain….Dam Beat writers LOL
Carney would be a nice pick up -he actually has the size to guard most SF’s.

Jacksonville should have signed Vick …He’s like a faster more athletic version of Gerrard- O better arm too

I MUS WRITE

August 14th, 2009
10:03 pm

Salim….hahahahahaha Salim LOL I heard he signed with the Ft Wayne Red Antz Well Dam!!!

Ariose is resonding in 4.3.2.1. Salim hahaha

kwooden1

August 14th, 2009
10:22 pm

I MUS send me your email address: kwooden1@yahoo.com

O'Brien

August 14th, 2009
10:37 pm

Ariose,

I also think the Hawks need a 3rd PG. But not Flip. We need a pass first PG.

I hope the Hawks really did sign Joe Smith. To fill out the roster, I would sign Gerald Green, Siler, and 1 more PG, which would give us 14 guys. And that would give us some very good depth.

PG – Bibby/Teague/3rd PG
SG – JJ/Crawford/Mo Evans
SF – Marvin/Gerald Green
PF – Josh/Joe Smith
C – Al/ZaZa/RandMo/Siler

kwooden1

August 14th, 2009
10:39 pm

Sounds like we’re moving in the right direction with Joe Smith, I really think he’s making the right decision if he’s coming with us. Woody really likes vets and Josh Smith can have an actual live mentor to help him along. I’m a Maryland U. guy and remember seeing Joe Smith well before anyone knew who he was. He was definitely over-hyped when he came out, I never really believed his go-to moves would work in the NBA. But I’ve been happy to see him have a solid career in the NBA and realistically get the most out of his potential.

GO HAWKS!!!

cp

August 15th, 2009
12:06 am

Great signing. Now if we can get Gerald Green in here to back up Marvin I would be pretty happy with this roster. I guess we finish it off with Siler and Hunter or Siler and 3rd pg I have no idea at this point.

Melvin

August 15th, 2009
12:13 am

I would be happy if the Hawks signed Joe Smith. I would be ecstatic if they sign Gerald Green and Mark Blount (if available) along with Siler and West to roundout the bench….

Reggie

August 15th, 2009
12:33 am

Najeh Davenpoop

August 15th, 2009
12:48 am

Please get this Joe Smith thing done already. Yeah I know ESPN says it’s a done deal, but Sekou tweeted less than five hours ago that they are still working on it. I tend to believe Sekou in these situations.

I’m happy for Vick that he got signed and that he can now work towards paying off his debts, but honestly I would have rather seen him sign with a team that would give him a chance to play quarterback full time. Apparently he turned down two other teams to sign with Philly — I’d like to know who those teams were. I am worried that although he may get to be “eased” into the NFL, he may also be “eased” away from being a full-time quarterback. Vick as a quarterback was a unique talent the likes of which the league has never seen. Vick as a wide receiver/punt returner/running back is just another fast guy who can’t break tackles, run routes, or catch passes — things he has never done before and probably can’t learn how to do at an NFL level at this point in his career. The last thing I want to see is Vick turned into a glorified Devin Hester. What an absolute waste of his cannon arm that would be.

Ken Strickland

August 15th, 2009
12:55 am

Assuming we’ve actually signed Joe Smith, what would be the point in signing Gerald Green? You know Zaza, Crawford and Joe Smith will get their mins, which would create an 8 man rotation. There’s also SF MEvans and backup rookie PG JTeague to consider for mins. With Woodson’s limited rotations, where would mins for Gerald Green, or any other addition, fit in?

Face the facts, if we’ve really signed Joe Smith as reported, that would give us 11 players already under contract. Beyond that, filler like Siler is all we’ll get.

JSS

August 15th, 2009
12:56 am

Co-sign Najeh!!!

Just waking up and getting ready to head to Olympic Stadium. Checking in to see if there was any real news on the Joe Smith signing not being reported by ESPWrong… Keep up the good work folks… I know it will be early there (3:45AM), but there’s going to be some good action on day one… Peace!!!

niremetal

August 15th, 2009
1:02 am

Co-sign Ken Strickland. And anyway, I’d rather have Othello than Gerald “defense…what’s that?” Green. Even at (800k!!!!!!). When you’re the 12th man, effort and pushing the players above you during practice is more important than athleticism.

niremetal

August 15th, 2009
1:14 am

If the Joe Smith rumor turns out to be true, the Hawks would have 11 guys under contract – Bibby, Teague, JJ, Crawford, Mo, Marvin, Josh Smith, Joe Smith, Horford, Zaza, and RandMo. I’ll also throw Siler on the roster for good measure (he seems the most likely of the mini-camp folks to be offered a contract). That’s 12.

I’d honestly say the biggest remaining need would be a combo forward who could step up and provide some mop-up minutes if Marvin and/or Josh get injured. That points to guys like Hunter or Korolev.

The other need arguably is for a 3rd point guard, since the Hawks have at least 3 guys under contract who can play and have played at every other position. I would prefer a PG that is pass-first, and also a veteran who could tutor Hart and help with some of the “pure PG” skills that Bibby lacks. Jason Hart actually fits that profile pretty well, and Bibby played with him in Sac, so presumably Sund will ask for Bibby’s take on him if there are indeed negotiations going on with him (and who knows – maybe it was Bibby who suggest Hart in the first place).

In any case, let’s hope that Joe Smith gets locked up. Assuming that happens, we can all sit back until training camp, because the Hawks finally can field a 10-deep squad.

niremetal

August 15th, 2009
1:20 am

PS – if Joe Smith signs, let’s just be thankful that Josh Childress isn’t here anymore. Getting the names straight will already be confusing enough…

KevinA

August 15th, 2009
1:48 am

Day by day we are getting closer to the day we can trade Crawford for cash/trade for a center/pf that will free up cash. I say give him a chance and if he plays well he provide valuable trade bait.

KevinA

August 15th, 2009
1:52 am

The chance to trade Crawford for an oppornututy to get Chills would be outstanding.

KevinA

August 15th, 2009
1:56 am

Throw in a Flip for the same money and the Hawks would be in tall growing conditions.

KevinA

August 15th, 2009
2:00 am

Maybe a Crawford trade would allow us to keep Flip and find something defensive like even Chills next year.

Mike is back

August 15th, 2009
9:51 am

Just like to say that if the Joe signing is true great job Sund…if it is a one deal than I hope it is because Sund is close to resigning Joe.

I’m some what confused about all the Crawford trade talks without seeing how well he messes with the team. He will be a great addition to this team.

Melvin

August 15th, 2009
9:51 am

KevinA,

Are you gonna let Crawford try on his Hawks uniform before you trade him.

I would like to see a backup SF sign such as Green, Carney or Korolev. Mo Evans is tough but he lack the size to play SF.

Mike

August 15th, 2009
10:04 am

Exactly…please stop with this talk of trading Crawford. We no whave a 6th man who averaged 19 a game last year. That is instant offense and as much as I loved Flip, Crawford is an upgrade. Now our 10 man rotation is set…nice job Sund. We will see how the other 3 or 4 spots take shape. We should leave a spot open for in season moves…no need to have 15 guys under contract to start the season.

Question is: who will be 11-14. Morris, Siler, Hunter, West, Hart, Korolev. 4 of those 6.

Ariose

August 15th, 2009
10:16 am

Who in the Hell is Heart????? Seriously. I DON’T HAVE ANY CLUE WHO HE IS!!!! I EVEN LOOKED THE GUY UP!!!!!!

I.Mus, I plead the 5th….

Why would’t Sund sign Joe Smith to a 2yr deal? That way he could be a tradebale asset next summer…

O’Brien, don’t give me that. you know good and well it has nothing to do with being a pass first guard. Rick Sund will not sign ANY PG that is going to be a threat to Teagues Playing Time.

Jason Williams, Jamaal Tinsley, Ramon Sessions, Carlos Arroyo, Flip Murray…non of them will be signed by us…..not that i’m mad about that, BUT Flip is still the best Guard on that list period.

This is why I wanted us to Draft Patrick Mills in the 2nd. Woody Wouldn’t play him over Teague, but Mills would be a gerat Backup to Teauge in the Future.

Ariose

August 15th, 2009
10:17 am

Falcons pre-seaon game at 4pm….

Ariose

August 15th, 2009
10:26 am

1. Orlando
2. Boston
3. Cleveland
4. Atlanta
5. Miami
6. Washington
7. chicago
8. toronto

2nd round
Orlando / Atlanta
Boston / Washington

ECF
Orlando / Boston

Hmmm….CAVS out in 1st Rd next season? I LIKE IT!!!!!

BTWbsome guy on ESPN POSTED that…

Ariose

August 15th, 2009
10:29 am

I’ll admit the players they added are better than the super scrubs they had last year, but they are still pretenders.
Shaq = old and fat
Moon = crap
Parker = old
powe = decent but injured.

I like the way this guy thinks Hahahaha!!!!

Ken Strickland

August 15th, 2009
10:30 am

NIREMETAL-I don’t see us signing another PG. We already have Bibby and Teague as our primary PG’s, with Crawford and JJ having PG skills. Woodson’s OFF is more dependent on a PG with good shooting skills, not traditional PG skills. So Crawford will serve as our 3rd PG with JJ backing him up.

At this point in our teams development, our success this season will depend more on how we utilize our talent, and our style of play, rather than who we add to our bench.

niremetal

August 15th, 2009
10:39 am

Ken,

I agree. I never said Hart would or should get minutes. I said we should add him as a “just-in-case” for depth (and as a PG tutor for Teague) and because there have already been a couple stories linking him to the Hawks. I don’t think whether we add him will affect the team’s success this year, except to the extent that he helps Teague and/or pushes Teague and Bibby in practice (a la Adonal Foyle in Orlando last year)

The Truth

August 15th, 2009
11:07 am

It looks like Sund has finally gotten a base hit, nice job (if true). As I read ESPN report that this is just a 1-year deal at minimum salary. It’s hard to imagine Joe Smith would go through this much drama only to settle for such a small deal. I got to believe there is more to the story.

So, now the impact of a Joe Smith on the Hawks takes center stage. Obliviously, Josh will be the most affected by the backup vet, let’s hope in a positive way. Since Joe Smith is considered a jump-shooting PF, he could cause Josh to emulate and do what we REALLY don’t want Josh to do which is SHOOT MORE JUMPERS. Also, Woody will be more inclined to pull Josh earlier when he takes those nights off since he knows he got a reliable backup. If Josh has still not reached that level of maturity with his ego, it could cause a riff between Josh and Woody, we shall see. Woody coaching will be severely tested. However on the positive side, Joe Smith will certainly cause match-up problem if Woody uses him correctly with Crawford, JJ and Teague on the court at the same time as one many scenarios.

Sekou Smith

August 15th, 2009
11:25 am

Bucher beat me to the punch on Joe Smith. I’ll take my lumps on that one. Ha. But I was out last night at Chef Rob’s place in Sandy Springs and sometimes you get lost in that caribbean vibe. New blog is up. Grade the Hawks’ summer. And nothing final yet on Joe. Monday will start the final process. But pencil him into the rotation.

Melvin

August 15th, 2009
11:30 am

Sekou, enjoy your vacation. You still Da Man.

Dashizz357

August 20th, 2009
10:50 am

I can’t understand why half of you guys aren’t coaching, you guys know it all. Wow! This ain’t playstation……

The Flash

September 25th, 2009
5:01 pm

I don’t mean to get all scientific on you all, but anybody ever notice that there is a section of MW’s back that always has been like ram-rod straight. Well, there is, and I think that he needs to work on that, and not on no 3 point shooting or dribbling. He needs to go and get him some flexion in that part of his spine, and those other things will take care of themselves, if you ask me, which no one here is no more but that will not stop me from offering up my opinion. Nope, its still just about summer, and I got my feet up, and I’m speculatin about ball on a Friday afternoon. Now, what can be better than that.

I bet I could help MW learn to use that back of his better, you know with my Feldenkrais stuff and all, and the rest will follow. Problem is I couldn’t get a chance when my boy was on the in. I suppose MW is just gonna have to struggle along with that frozen part of his back some more, and you all along with him, fussin about how he needs to work on his dribble or 3 point shot, like he ain’t been doing that all his life.