
The Hawks finally scratched their seven year itch and moved on 2002 draft pick David Andersen ... by moving him to Houston for cash, considerations and a future second-round draft pick.
HAWKSVILLE - Things are moving so quickly around here these days, you might mistake this for a regular NBA offseason.
It’s been a long time coming for the Hawks. But for the first time in years, certainly in my years here, things are moving at a fast and furious pace that I think we can all appreciate.
Trades. Free agent signings (and re-signings). It’s all going down before mid-August, which is a welcome change to the Hawks’ recent past, when summer transactions always seemed to stretch into fall.
But in the interest of our collective sanity, can we please cease and desist the needless attacks on Josh Childress (here, on Twitter and everywhere else)?
He’s moved on for another season – back to Greece if you haven’t heard. We can joust about him next summer, when it might actually mean something.
In closing, however, both sides did the right things. Childress couldn’t in good faith turn his back on the kind of money he’ll make with Olympiakos this coming season for a sub-mid-level deal in either Milwaukee or Charlotte, cities that haven’t sniffed the playoffs lately (ever in Charlotte’s case). The Hawks did the right thing in not losing an asset like Childress for a player (be it Kurt Thomas in Milwaukee or Raja Bell in Charlotte) that doesn’t offer much value beyond an expiring contract. They were right to demand more in exchange for a player in his prime (Childress is just 26), be it a future draft pick or cash or something else. The Hawks remain the (NBA) team with leverage where Childress is concerned, and they’d be wise to hold on to that leverage as long as possible.
Moving on, there was this afternoon’s mild surprise that the Hawks traded David Andersen’s rights to Houston for a future second-round pick, cash and future considerations. That could be counted that as yet another shrewd and calculated move by a Hawks team that has made many this summer, so long as Andersen doesn’t turn out to be the second coming of Luis Scola.
Andersen’s 29 and a longtime pro of consequence in Europe. He’s hardly prepared to surrender his ability to earn more money in Europe for a situation in the NBA that won’t allow him to recoup his losses in a fit to his liking. With the Hawks he would have been stuck behind Zaza Pachulia in the rotation, his only real opening for playing time coming if someone else suffered a serious injury (I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound like an ideal set up to me).
In return, the Hawks snagged not only a future second-round draft pick to replace Andersen, they also collect cash believed to be in the amount of $2 million, which comes in handy as this summer goes on (and they continue to scour the free agent landscape for big man help). After years of sitting on their assets it’s time the Hawks started cashing in a few of these chips (Cenk “Blame it on the a-a-a-a-a-a” Akyol is the next international talent the Hawks must evaluate, to see if and when he might be ready to help the cause).
This is a win for Andersen as well. He should have a clear path to playing time in Houston, provided the Rockets work out a deal to free him from his contract with FC Barcelona. With Yao Ming’s injury situation and the departure of Ron Artest, the Rockets will have to reinvent themselves on the fly (if any coach is capable of coming up with something, Rick Adelman is the man to do it).
It’s just nice to see the Hawks immersed in routine summer business for a change, stuff that doesn’t involve them squandering assets the way they did when guys like Antoine Walker, Al Harrington and Tony Delk moved on without the Hawks getting much of anything in return.
Think about it, had someone told you this time a year ago that the Hawks could get a player of Jamal Crawford’s caliber for Acie Law IV and Speedy Claxton you’d have jumped on that without hesitation.
354 comments Add your comment
outlaw30079
July 14th, 2009
11:17 pm
I Hope This Dont Come Back On Us
Tommy
July 14th, 2009
11:18 pm
I just hope they bring in a decent big.
Tommy
July 14th, 2009
11:20 pm
If they can bring in someone to solidify the post and contribute in the event of an injury we will be set.
niremetal
July 14th, 2009
11:21 pm
From the end of the last blog, on the Andersen deal:
Not at all saying the trade was affirmatively “good.” Merely saying that from my perspective, this seemed like the reasonable move. The Spurs did almost the exact same thing two summers ago with Scola – they traded him to Houston for a second rounder. RC Buford is probably the best GM in recent NBA history and he basically made the same deal we just made for Andersen – and Buford traded a foreign big man who was younger and WAY more hyped than Andersen is now.
Andersen may turn out to be a good player, and he’s tailor-made for Adelman’s offense. But dude wasn’t gonna come over from Europe to play 10 minutes a game on the Hawks’ bench. I kinda wish there was a way to squeeze more out of him as an asset, but this seems like as reasonable way to “dealing with” Andersen as we could hope for.
niremetal
July 14th, 2009
11:23 pm
$2 mil? Damn. In this economy, that ain’t bad at all…
Dan
July 14th, 2009
11:32 pm
I am starting to like this Sund fellow. I got down on him last summer, after he lost Childress. He has come back strong from that, though.
I can only assume the big man is Chris Wilcox? He makes the most sense. Hope to hear that Sund lands him in the next few days.
Sekou, isn’t Fransico Ellson a free angent? I always thought he would be a good fit here.
Sekou Smith
July 14th, 2009
11:39 pm
I like Elson, too (you might remember he was a hot topic around here a last year and the year before). But he’s not a free agent. He had a player option this season in Milwaukee.
Melvin
July 14th, 2009
11:47 pm
Nire,
Ok I will forfeit debate base on Sekou’s report that Andersen would have been stuck on the bench but I don’t see why. There’s mins behind Josh and possibly some mins at C but hey, I can’t argue that he should play more mins in Houston. But I have a question for you. If Houston is willing to give up a pick and 2 mil in cash for him, then how valuable is this guy? And if he’s not going to get mins, then what’s the purpose in bring in another big? Wouldn’t that person be in the same situation that Andersen would have been in?
niremetal
July 14th, 2009
11:56 pm
Melvin,
Yes, he will be in the same situation that Andersen will be in. The difference is that now we can bring that person in while we have a second round pick and $2 million cash in the bank.
Melvin
July 14th, 2009
11:56 pm
Not sure if this is the real Jamaal Crawford but look what he (or imposter) wrote on his twitter page:
@NBA4EVER just between me and u, Hawks been talkin to bosh
Samuel
July 15th, 2009
12:00 am
Great Job Rick. 2 mil and a #2. Great job.
Raja Bell? Hummmmmmmmm!!!!!
Art Vandelay
July 15th, 2009
12:00 am
Sekou, were you just being flippant with the Cenk Akyol comment, or do you really think there’s a team out there that would give us anything of value for him? Last I saw, he was averaging less than 4 ppg in Euroleague and playing about 10 minutes a game.
And Dan — I like Wilcox too, but it sure would be nice to get a big man who can hit free throws at better than a 50% clip. We had so much trouble with that last year that I’d hate for it to become even more of a liability this year with a brickmason like him.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
12:04 am
Melvin,
I’d be wary of the veracity of anything posted on Twitter that includes the words “just between me and u.”
But Sekou – do you know if that’s Jamal’s actual Twitter feed?
GuyanaDawg
July 15th, 2009
12:05 am
the Hawks are flyin baby! the team has been fun to watch the past few years and now we are in good management hands. things are lookin up – thanks for all the coverage Sekou! i trust we’ll get one more big before the season to sure up our rotation.
swatguy
July 15th, 2009
12:05 am
Does the 2 million windfall mean ASG will dip into the luxury tax pool?
I’m not sure a rookie backing up Bibs at point guard is safe or wise. Flip I think again is good insurance. For if Jamal spends time backing up Bibby, who will back up Joe. I’m not sure if contenders (or wannabe)develop core players per course.
How about Big Baby?
Since the Clips are losing their minds(see AI), can Camby/Kamen be had easily?
Do the Hornets still want to separate themselves from Chandler?
I suggest, Flip and Solomon signed and the best big option available.
by the way, Othello did some good things at the end of the year, maybe he as position 14. Keep seat #15 open for February(that’s what the big boys do).
Art Vandelay
July 15th, 2009
12:07 am
I would bet the farm (if I had one) that’s not Jamaal’s Twitter feed. The supposed “@JamaalCrawford” account is only 24 hours old and reads like it was written by a 12 year-old. I highly doubt he’d start giving away confidential information (which he has no access to) via Twitter to total strangers.
Samuel
July 15th, 2009
12:07 am
AV,
You are so right. Free throws really hurt us last year, I like Wilcox too but KThomas shoots 82% from the line. I’m just say’n.
Art Vandelay
July 15th, 2009
12:10 am
Oh, and if that is Jamal Crawford’s account, he misspelled his own name. Brilliant.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
12:14 am
AV,
Good catch on Jam mal Crawford name.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
12:16 am
Man i don’t understand why folks would pretend to be other people. Then again, i dont want to know either…
Chea
July 15th, 2009
12:17 am
DAMN I AM OLDER THAN SHAUN LIVINGSTON!
That is all.
Harry Hawk
July 15th, 2009
12:36 am
Are we gonna love Sund if he pays Joe $18-20 million a year?
Probably not.
Nevertheless, the man has done a good job of consolidating this offseason. He also had enough sense not to give Woody a contract extension. That’s probably the smartest move of all.
Grip
July 15th, 2009
12:38 am
I beg to differ, Houston’s GM has done the best job of drafting and acquiring free agents, Brooks, Landry, Taking a chance on Artest, not to mention Scola, Von Wafer, I think we just got hood winked, and San Antone wishes they had Scola right now, Buford got waxed on that one, this is not football,2nd round picks are pretty much a waste in the NBA. Anderson’s issues are tied into woody, who else has players and won’t give the some TIck?? And wilcox is GARBAGE!!! Always has been and will continue to be, I will take Jamal McGlore any day of the week, and he is cheaper. RIck Sund got rid of nine million in salary and took on close to the same in return, the move should have been to acquire a big with that money and sign Flip back, how hard could this have been? Rick Sund has not failed but he ain’t done nothing yet either. The double negative is there for a reason
HawkKingBibby
July 15th, 2009
12:39 am
I dont know if I can be as optimistic as you Sekou. We could have had Afro Power and a nice offensive big coming off the bench for us this year giving us great depth but instead we have a 2nd round pick. That pick will be another Euro that wont be here till 2016 when his rights get traded for a future pick to a team that will pay its players. Walker and Al got us 1st round picks ( one of which helped get us JOE )the other Acie Law helped get us Crawford. I think 1st round picks that helped get us an all star and our 6th man have more value than a 2nd round pick but thats just me.
Reggie
July 15th, 2009
12:57 am
Sekou
What about Ben Wallace coming here? I think its a great fit. He has played under Mike Woodson, & he is a veteran thats been around the league. Thoughts?
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
1:00 am
HawkKingBibby, come on. You think NBA team that would be willing to give up a first round pick (and the low rookie payscale contract) to get a 29-year old with a rep for playing no D even by Euro standards?
And Reggie – don’t think that Ben Wallace wants to play anymore. He’s hasn’t looked like he’s cared this past year…
B-Kitty
July 15th, 2009
1:05 am
We can move on now! Lets go after Wilcox and call it a day. He could be the missing piece(muscle) we need inside.Plus he is good for 10-12pts 10-12 rebounds. Lets move on it. And please let them run this year. If you have racehorses, you have to let them run.
Reggie
July 15th, 2009
1:08 am
what are you talking about? He played on a team that had the best record in the NBA. looks like he cared to me. Okay he is not the player he used to be, but but he can still help this team. he doesn’t have to play 30 minutes a night. him giving us 10-15 minutes is what this team needs.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
1:14 am
Reggie,
Don’t know what games you were watching if you think Wallace played with half the heart he used to. He was hardly the reason the Cavs won 60 games. A couple dozen people commented on that fact on this blog during the Cavs’ series and after the Shaq trade. My guess is that if he has any desire to play, it won’t be coming off the bench for 10-15 minutes a game .
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
1:17 am
And PS – I am a LONG time fan of Ben Wallace…heck, I’m playing some pickup ball tomorrow afternoon and I’ll be wearing my full Big Ben get-up from Steve and Barry’s (RIP). So this isn’t hate. But the man didn’t really want to play anymore. I saw it, dozens of other people commented on it, and he himself alluded to it when he said he wanted to retire. The fact that he allowed himself to be bought out rather than playing out the season should say how much he wants to play…
mark
July 15th, 2009
1:20 am
Hello again Hawks fans!!!!!!! I agree we need to go and get Chandler because he’s a big man and he can run the floor really well…… Also we really really need to sign Flip Murray back………. And we will really have a good team without Lebron James!!!!! And my line up would be :
Crawford-G
Joe Johnson-G
Josh Smith-SF
Hartford-PF
Tyson-C
So this is my starter line up…. So lets get back on our Twitters and blogs and continue to lobby for Chandler………..
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good Bye!!!!!!!!!!!
jeremiah
July 15th, 2009
1:24 am
. We need a big man lets continue to lobby 4 Tyson Chandler, Chris Kaman from the Clippers, he’s a 7 foot 0 also and 265 lbs. JaVale McGee, another 7 footer from Wizards. I watched these guys play and they will really help the Hawks. So lets keep calling and writing in and get on Twitter, Youtube, Myspace, and Facebook. And put pressure on management. Just for trading for Crawford not going to get the job done. Also, sign Flip back. SO LETS GO HAWKS FANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hock
July 15th, 2009
1:30 am
Interesting that an unbiased, beat reporter would applaud a deal for a virtually worthless 2nd round pick plus $2 million. Oh well, we are used to Sarver doing the same type of cash transactions here in Phoenix. At least the press here aren’t so clueless as to compliment him for these deals.
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
1:55 am
I guess I have missed something. The Hawks are now in a position to where they can’t use a 6-11 big man who can play a little?
The Rockets are going to sign from what’s left of their MLE after the Ariza. That is the biggest shocker to me. I thought for sure if he didn’t sign with the Hawks it would be because he wanted a ton of money but it turns out that he could have been a Hawk for an amount that was not only reasonable, but would have also allowed the Hawks to sign another big as well.
The Rockets seem quite please ad one local sports talk radio show believes the Rocket’s “picked the Hawks pocket”.
As far as him playing major minutes, that is only going to be the case until Yao returns sometime in the second half of the season.
In fairness, I guess the Hawks felt that his skill set did not match what they needed at this time. He can run the floor, pass, and shoot, but is not a defensive presence.
Maybe, I’m slow, but there sure seems to be a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction permeating throughout our humble blog and within the columns of the AJC. I see would suggest the Hawks are an incomplete team as things stand now.
Even if we sign Marvin, is the addition of Crawford and Teague enough to overcome the Heat, Cavs, and Celtics who all have enhanced their frontcourt advantage over the Hawks? I guess the answer is yes if we’re in position to sell off an Anderson.
Yeah, I must have missed something because I could have sworn people here felt Anderson was someone who could help the Hawks, but now there aren’t enough minutes so we didn’t need him after all.
I guess we’ll see improvement through organic growth, especially with the 6-11 Morris who appears to be the biggest beneficiary in this transaction.
Go Hawks!!
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
2:04 am
The Magic improved their frontcourt advantage over the Hawks, not the Heat. Though they seem to be working on adding to their frontline as well. I would also add that Toronto vastly improved it’s frontline as well.
Yeah, I’m must be missing something.
Ho Hawks!!
MannyT
July 15th, 2009
2:51 am
kirkinga,
I think the key point about Andersen was the opportunity to play. If he shows up here, he is buried behind several younger players. In Houston, they need bigs now. Even if the money is similar, the Rockets have a much better opportunity.
BWAF
Najeh Davenpoop
July 15th, 2009
2:57 am
“Interesting that an unbiased, beat reporter would applaud a deal for a virtually worthless 2nd round pick plus $2 million. Oh well, we are used to Sarver doing the same type of cash transactions here in Phoenix.”
Sarver trades away first-round picks used on future starters, stars, and All-Stars for cash. David Andersen is not Rajon Rondo, Luol Deng, or Rudy Fernandez. The Hawks just traded away a former 2nd round pick who is now 29 years old and offers nothing defensively for a future 2nd round pick and cash. Maybe Andersen ends up helping the Rockets, who knows. This deal could make the Hawks look bad temporarily. I do know this — if there is any kind of big man the Hawks do not need, it is one who doesn’t play D and settles for jump shots. I’d much rather have Chris Wilcox.
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
3:29 am
Manny T, I understand the argument on it’s face it seems plausible, but I find it unpersuasive because he Anderson’s abundance of playing time is temporary. Even if Yao misses the entire upcoming season, Anderson’s minutes will be reduced once Yao returns.So is a season’s worth of increased playing time sufficient? That seems rather unambitious especially if one considers that the Rockets without Yao, Artest, and McGrady (he ain’t playing a full season soo there’s that) are going to have a tougher time winning in the West than the Hawks in the East.
Of course he may believe the Rockets will not resign Yao and he becomes the starter, but that’s unlikely I think.
I guess what I’m missing is the origin of this lack-of-playing time thesis? Did Anderson ask to be traded to another team, or did the Hawks believe he wouldn’t merit substantial playing time?
If it is the former, then why would he want substantial minutes, but not substantial money? Does that make sense to anyone? A player is going to say “”I’d rather have more playing time and in return I’ll take less money? The Hawks could have easily offered more than what he will get in Houston. So things don’t add up if we look at it from that end.
Now if it was the Hawks who felt there weren’t going to be enough minutes, then I go back to Melvin’s observation that this would apply to any subsequent singing. This too make no sense if one believes that a Wilcox, for example, is a better player; if there aren’t minutes for Anderson,an inferior player, why sign Wilcox or any player superior to Anderson as they are surely going to want to play? And if you are going to sign an inferior player, then you already have one in the 6-11 Morris.
What player that can help the Hawks is going to want to come here if there are no minutes? Theo perhaps? And if Theo, is he enough?
So the Playing Minutes Theory doesn’t seem to hold up to minimal scrutiny from either the player or team’s perspective.
Like I said, maybe I’m missing something?
Go Hawks!!
blue hawk
July 15th, 2009
5:25 am
Andersen was a productive and proven pro veteran, albeit a euro pro. i’d take my chances on that over a college kid second rounder.
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
6:40 am
The point you are all missing is that David Andersen didn’t want to play here. And if that’s the case, you could either let him go back to Europe or find a way to cash in the asset by doing what the Hawks did. Is there a chance he helps Houston? Of course, there is. Same way he could any team. But if the man has no desire to play for the Hawks, you can’t manufacture something that simply is not there. So the wise thing to do is move on and make sure you get something in return. That’s the basis for my entire theory about Childress (YOU DON’T PUNT AN ASSET IN THE NBA).
if Andersen turns out to be as good as Luis Scola, I’ll be glad to come back and bash the Hawks for miscalculating his worth. But we’ll have to wait and see just how good he is, what kind of role he plays on that Houston team and whether or not his impact is any greater than the impact that the Hawks’ 9th or 10th man’s impact is this season.
And as for Cenk Akyol, I didn’t meant that he’ll be the next trade chip … I only meant it’s time to evaluate him and see where he might fit, be it on the Hawks’ roster or elsewhere. I don’t have it confirmed yet, but I’m hunting to see if he’ll be on the mini-camp roster for next week.
I just think it’s time to start cashing in some of these chips the Hawks have piled up over the years.
A Tribe Called Quest
July 15th, 2009
6:57 am
WHY DOES EVERY HAWKS/ROCKET TRADE INVOLVE AVERAGE/CRAPPY PLAYERS OR 2ND ROUNDERS?
BOB SURA
JON BARRY
T. LUE
DAVID ANDERSON
PLENTY MORE
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
7:01 am
Sekou, one thing I can say about Sund is he is SHREWD! I like that. Anybody upset over losing Andersen needs to get a grip. He was not coming here for cheap $ and he was going to be the 3rd big off the bench at best. You don’t pay big $ for bench depth, you save for the ELITE player, or spend more on the core group which is exactly what Sund is doing.
As I stated yesterday, we shouuld not be too upset if Marvin takes the one year tenure. With JJ being a free agent next year that will leave us with $22,000,000 in flexibility to re-sign both or go another way. If we do get Marvin on the cheap (5yrs @ $7-$8million) COOL! We keep our core and have young, athletic, high potential, and reasonably priced pieces that we can play or trade.
Can anyone tell me when is the last time the HAWKS were in the driver’s seat with leverage? Easy…..NEVER until now. Well, maybe the last year we had Mr. Dominique Wilkens, Then we traded for Danny Manning. Dang it, that didn’t work out very well did it! LOL
Mr. Egger
July 15th, 2009
7:21 am
Anderson would back up Zaza? Is he really a true big? From reports on his game he reads more like a Keith van Horn, Kyle Korver, Reshard Lewis at best. 6′10, shooter at F, doesn’t sound physical, or like one to bang on the blocks, or like much of a rebounder. He could have taken the place of Solo off the bench maybe, or Marvin’s spot if Crawford and Johnson could start on the wings, but he does not sound like a big man. And the team really needs a big man, a true big who can block shots and bang with physical players like Howard, Shaq, and Perkins. Josh Smith could be that type of guy, if he’d ever focus on playing exclusively around the painted area.
PD
July 15th, 2009
8:12 am
Sekou do the Hawks have to tender Chilly the qualifiying offer ever year to keep his right?
kwooden1
July 15th, 2009
8:20 am
Sounds like a good deal to me. The guy is 29 and wasn’t going to block shots. You can’t wait forever for him to decide if he wants to come to the NBA and Houston was willing to take him. If he wanted to come to the HAWKS it’s a different story, but from all accounts he didn’t. 2nd Rounder and cash is pretty good, considering you get to a retry with the pick (I think he was a 2nd round pick) and money to work with in a tough economy. I’m still hoping Wilcox will want to come here, but I still don’t think the HAWKS can offer him a full MLE. I think the best thing right now would be to sign Solo and call it a off-season. Personally I think Solo just needs more playing time to be a good backup PF/C.
GO HAWKS!!
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
8:28 am
Sekou, how do you know he did not want to play here? Reason I ask, the translated articles were saying he really wanted to play in the NBA, but the Hawks did not want to pay him anything, and made a tiny offer. So which is it?
I will only applaud this deal if the 2 million soon goes into upgrading the talent on the court for next season, by signing another big who can contribute on D. And what are the ‘other considerations’. A basketball and some towels? I suspect they picked our pockets as well, we will see. Currently the Hawks are short on big men and Andersen very well could have gotten alot of ZaZa’s minutes by contributing on offense where the Hawks are short on bigs who can shoot from outside, particularly if he had been paired with another cheap D-big.
SpaniardHawk
July 15th, 2009
8:47 am
I like the trade if we use the money to get a center. Maybe Andersen will become a new Luis Scola, but a I have seen him play this year with Barcelona and I think that he is not the player that the Hawks need. But maybe I am wrong.
wordsmithtom
July 15th, 2009
8:52 am
Anderson…please
We just signed Zaza for long term. More physical and younger. He can shoot and will defend. Where’s the place for Anderson now or ever? Get a grip. Sign another banger to back up the power forward and let Zaza do what he does.
Come on, if Anderson was this good, why have 3 different general managers passed on showing him the money???
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
8:55 am
Sekou,
Thanks for all the great updates. As many others are asking, can you explain further the facts that lead to the statement that David Anderson did not want to be here.
Also, your buddy Mark Bradley is painting this move as the ASG going on the cheap. Were do you stand on that take?
I, too, have been impressed with the Hawks this off season. We seem downright professional. Can you imagine that!
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
8:55 am
I meant “where do you stand on that take”
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
9:10 am
Andersen coming to the Hawks was contingent on Zaza going elsewhere. When Zaza returned, that made this a no-win situation for Andersen.
Andersen’s camp asked the Hawks to move him to a team that could accommodate his situation. It’s not unheard of in the NBA … guys wants a better situation. Same thing Acie Law IV’s camp did earlier this summer. This is not complicated stuff.
And yes PD, they have to extend the qualifying offer to keep Chil’s rights. Next summer could be interesting in that regard, especially if Marvin’s an unrestricted free agent along with deals needing to be done for say both Joe Johnson and Al Horford. It could just be really interesting to see what kind of choices the Hawks make if they have all those things to juggle next year.
dap01
July 15th, 2009
9:11 am
Thanks for the update. With the new format, your Blog is much harder to find.
Please send us some big man rumors!
Anakin Joe
July 15th, 2009
9:18 am
nire, I’ve seen you compare our off-season moves to what teams like the Spurs and Lakers have done previously. I’m not sure that a team who hasn’t advanced to the 3rd round of a playoffs can make the same moves as teams with multiple championships in the past decade. Their moves have been to maintain a contending squad… something that we don’t have. A company with 55% market share gets to do things that a competitior with 15% share can’t (or shouldn’t) do. Much like the Speedy/Acie trade, I don’t question what was sent out, I question what was brought back.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
9:27 am
Nire/MannyT/whomever,
This is a bit off topic but do know what happens to the monies thats paid into the luxury tax pool. Is it like baseball, where it’s share amongst the remaining teams thats under the luxury tax cap?
Jay
July 15th, 2009
9:29 am
Sekou,
I understand that the Hawks traded Anderson to Houston for a second round pick, cash ($2Million) and future considerations. Just curious but what might those “future considerations” be?
vava74
July 15th, 2009
9:30 am
Hawks fans are cronic malcontents.
David Andersen averaged 4 rebounds per game in Europe! He will not be a second coming of Luis Scola. He will be a role player, a poor man’s Okur AT BEST.
We need something quite different and I sincerelly would prefer to keep developing Otello who I really believe could be a Charles Oakley type of player within 2/3 years.
Moderaterly talented, physically gifted hardworking guys are essential. Just like Leon Powe (which I would sign immediately).
On a slightly different note, and knowing that we are talking about a guy selected by Rick Sund: does anyone knows the status of Robert Swift? He put very good numbers on his 2nd season and then slipped.
I think he could be – also on the tatoos – a kind of Chris Andersen type of player for us IF he proves to have a brain somewhere and his recent slippage is not due to his lack of effort.
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
9:32 am
Not sure yet, Jay. As soon as I find out I’ll pass it along.
wmatlanta
July 15th, 2009
9:33 am
So SK, who’s your starting lineup now? and what’s Joe Johnson’s contract status? shouldn’t they be talking extension now, or will the lower salary cap keep him here beyond 2010?
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
9:39 am
Another thing, if Andersen has a chance to start in Houston (www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/bk/bkn/6529269.html) or play behind Horford and Zaza here, why would he want to come to the Hawks, for less money?
Again, I applaud both the Rockets and Hawks for doing a deal that makes sense (those things don’t always happen in the NBA.
If he’s the Rockets’ short-term answer for Yao, which sounds like the plan that is in place, then it makes complete sense for them to do want to get this deal done. And if the Hawks wanted to get something of serious value in return for Andersen, I’d say they did that.
Again, a win-win for both teams. I know it’s rare and that we’re always trying to decide who got the crappy end of a deal. But every now and then things work out for all involved.
Now would I liked to have seen a player like David Andersen on the Hawks’ roster this season? Of course. They’d be better with Childress, too. But that’s just not the way things work.
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
9:41 am
wm, the starting five for the Hawks remains the same as last year. And they have several months to discuss an extension with Joe. There are other priorities (adding another big or two) that would seem to be much more pressing at this time.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
9:42 am
Sekou,
Any rumors on the big men they are considering?
Benjamin
July 15th, 2009
9:51 am
Sekou, does the Childress factor really just boil down to money? I can’t understand why he wouldn’t want to play here, but it seemed this offseason like he came over just to entertain teams like Milwaukee and Charlotte. Why would a young talent that could fit right in and push us up the ladder in a strengthening Eastern Conference want to play for those teams and not the Hawks?
OzinATL
July 15th, 2009
9:52 am
Mixed feelings about this Andersen deal.
Regardless of what has been said, the dude wanted to come and play in the NBA, no question about that, he even had gone on record to say it wasn’t about the money (as he would earn more money in Europe).
When you are looking for quality free agents, this guy is definately in the top tier from Europe (his pedigree for the past 11 years their is second to none – does it translate to NBA success, not always but he has a better chance to succeed than most) and your European free agents are generally cheaper than NBA free agents, and most times, are more skilled dollar for dollar. This is one reason why I am surprised the Hawks traded him after so many years holding onto his rights instead of using his talents (hey, and even though Rockets need big men abd the trade suited them at them moment – do you think the Rockets are going to make a trade such as this (draft pick and money) for a guy they figure will not help them)?
So I guess the questions were:
#1 Did he really want to play for the Hawks?
#2 Was he really that worried about playing time in ATL?
#3 Did the Hawks rally make him feel wanted?
#4 Does the deal help the Hawks now?
#1 Unless Sekou has inside knowledge, I have not heard anything to say he didn’t want to play for the Hawks. Bottom line, he wanted to play in NBA, Hawks owned his rights, he was frustrated that they would not commit to him (money not the real issue). I would be too if a team held onto my rights for so long and I had that type of resume in Europe.
#2, I don’t think this is as big an issue as people realize. He would be playing PF in the second unit and at the moment, who else would be playing this. He averages 20 minutes in Europe anyway, so really, he would not be expecting more minutes than that, and that’s great for backing up Josh Smith. He has shown in Europe that in his 20 minutes he is very productive offensively – which is perfect for your back up PF when you have Zaza providing the muscle. So how would he be playing behind Zaza (isn’t that Solo and Randolph)
#3 I really don’t think the Hawks valued him enough. I actually wonder how many times the Hawks have scouted him live in Europe in those 7 years they have held his rights….probably not enough which again, points to the fact they don’t value him enough. Obvsiously the Rockets do, they have a need, but they must have done their homework to feel this guy can help them immediately without Yao so Rockets valued him and wanted him, Hawks didn’t.
#4 How can it. The Hawks need depth now if they are to challenge for the powers in the Eastern Conference and progress further than last 2 years. Isn’t that what each year is about, getting better so you can challenge for the Title? I think this is a step back, as what can a 2nd round future draft pick give the Hawks now rather than an abled body who would add depth to the Hawks roster and help them over the course of a season. I belive the Hawks have done the right things by keeping everyone together and by adding Crawford they increase their talent and depth. Andersen would have done the same and I believe this is how you win more games, adding a couple of pieces every season (doesn’t have to be majore just contributors) so the Coach has more options (don’t have to get into Woody debate, assume you have a coach who can coach and teach). How does a second round pick achieve this.
All in all, the only way I see this as a good move for the Hawks, is if Andersen refused to want to play for the Hawks. That’s the only way.
Jay
July 15th, 2009
9:55 am
Thanks. By the way, any word on Solomon Jones? Has he gained any weight and was his lack of heft the only reason he didn’t get more run?
vava74
July 15th, 2009
10:11 am
I’ve just checked and Robert Swift’s carreer went down due to injuries and apparently not due to lack of mental stability.
He is only 25 and if he passed a physical and seemed recovered from his injury woes and was available, I would bring him to the camp.
I MUS.WRITE
July 15th, 2009
10:24 am
Proactive instead of reactive……. Thats whass up-if Anderson is’nt coming over then get something for him- Its been 7 dam years this should have happened 3-4 years ago… Who does the man think he is- demanding a certain number of minutes and muney lol……. Demand??? Big sund dont play that -”take 2 mill and 12 minutes a game or get the hell outta here” I luv it……
Just hope he doesnt come over here and turn into a 15/8 type guy…
Now its time for Cynk and this so called marksman we wasted a pick on this year. Good bye Chills nice to know you -go back to Greece and out of our lives -We’re try’n to build sumthing here- get on board or get gone…………
Im starting to warm up to Nesterovic and Joe smith being our new bigs.
Ben
July 15th, 2009
10:31 am
Sekou,
So does this mean we are NOT signing another veteran big man? Bradley seems to think the Andersen deal signals the Hawks are done for the offseason except for Marvin. We HAVE to get some BIGS in here or next season is going to be awful.
PD
July 15th, 2009
10:32 am
Sekou, so Chilly gets another check from the Hawks this offseason? This is amazing!!!!!!
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
10:32 am
Co-sign, OzinATL.
Funny how Chills went from wanting to get his deal done early in Free Agency to not wanting to play for the Hawks anymore.
Funny how Andersen went from wanting to play in the NBA to not wanting to play for the Hawks…
Ernest
July 15th, 2009
10:33 am
Sekou, thanks for your explanations about this trade, especially the one @ 9:39a. Some seem to forget that GMs have to ‘budget’ both dollars and playing time. Andersen was going to get 8-12 minutes/game at most however probably wanted a salary comparable to what he is currently making. I’m sure our budget didn’t allow for that, given the amount of time he would see on the court.
At the end of the day, it’s business….
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
10:33 am
Sekou – thanks for these answsers but have you been demoted? Mark and Jeff can talk about the Hawks with links on the main sports page, which is where I tend to stay, but now I have to go down one level and hunt to find the link to your blog. Why is the teams blog section no longer on the main sports page, but fan blog links still are? Not user-experience friendly, AJC.
ATMAN
July 15th, 2009
10:36 am
What is our actual roster right now? Also, what is the maximum number of players allowed on roster?
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
10:37 am
Never mind – I see they now have added the link to your blog under the Hawks section on main sports page – good!
matt r
July 15th, 2009
10:49 am
I don’t know, Andersen’s looking pretty good against the Algiris Pickles.
Today’s Celtics Links 7/15 at New England Sports 24/7
July 15th, 2009
10:50 am
[...] Loss of Killer Instinct (81-82) Random Drive-Bys (Lakers Edition) Lamar, Lamar, Lamar AJC Childress and Andersen are gone Bleacher Report Top 10 Active Under Rated Players In the NBA Paul Millsap: The Waiting [...]
HawkKingBibby
July 15th, 2009
10:55 am
Niremetal, I wasnt trying to say that the Hawks should have got a 1st round pick for Andersen. Im saying the Hawks had two assets that could have either played here or have been traded for guys to play here THIS SEASON in Andersen and Chills just two days ago. Now all we have is a future 2nd round pick. How is that anywhere near equal or better than ( as Sekou wrote ) to what we got back for Antoine and Al since those two got us 1st rounders that helped aquire JJ and Crawford?
Samuel
July 15th, 2009
11:00 am
The man has “2nd Round” talent and we got a 2nd round pick for him and 2 million dollars. Cuz, is that pick this next draft? If so, it should be a high pick as Houston will be scrubbing the bottom this year. Good Job Rick.
Lamar Odom Update:
http://www.insidesocal.com/lakers/2009/07/more-odom.html
We just got 2 mil more to offer this man. Just say’n.
C-Horford
PF-Josh
SF-L. Odom
SG-JJ
PG-Bibby
That line up will turn some heads.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
11:09 am
kirk- a season of significant playing time in the NBA IS enough insentive for a guy coming from Europe. One season in the NBA is enough to improve his stock around the league. So I do understand the move from Anderson’s perspective.
Dos Hawkquis
July 15th, 2009
11:10 am
Can we agree on a few things with this blog?
1.Hawks have about 6mil left to fill the roster. Cayman, Camby, Tyson Chandler make WAY more than 6mil. Stop bringing their names up.
2.Stop bringing the JSmoove for Amare trade scenario. Amare has had major surguries on his knees and eyes, two VERY CRITICAL components to play basketball. Smoove is healthier and younger.
3.Stop talking about FIRE WOODY!! The man has taken the team to 2 playoff appearances, after a 10 yr. drought. He even made it to the 2nd rnd this past season.
4.Flip is not coming back!! Get over it!! You have JJ, Teague, Crawford, and Bibby vying for minutes at the same position that Flip plays. There is only 48minutes in regulation. No need for 5 guys who play the same position.
If we can stick to these 4 principles, it will make reading the blogs eaiser. I try to read everyone’s comments and rehashing things that are not going to happen is wasting time.
I enjoy the valuable insights that I get from SEKOU, DARRELL STARKS, IMUS, NIREMETAL, DOC, KEN S., ANAKIN, BIG RAY, ARIOSE et al. Keep up the good work guys.
Oh yeah…”I don’t always watch basketball, but when I do, I prefer the Hawks. Stay thirsty my friends!!”
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
11:16 am
wow dos hawk…. I guess I am just an et. al, booo
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
11:19 am
Sekou….
Still wondering if you would care to comment on Bradley’s assertion that the Anderson deal signals that the Hawks are done with free agents.
I certainly hope not, and the rest of their moves have not seemed to signal anything but smart moves to improve the team. They would currently have 5-6 mil. to sign another front court big (should be more than enough for a wilcox/bass type player).
Is Bradley just playing blog?
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
11:39 am
Ok, well I don’t know where we were supposed to get that Anderson “didn’t want to play here”? Even still, any increased playing time he get’s in Houston is only for a season at the most. They have a rotation of bigs in Houston too and Yao plays a good 32 minutes a game.
Second, we’re suppose to believe that a guy so worried about his playing time would not also insist on a contract larger than what he is reported to be getting from Houston? Does that add up? He believes he’s worth the playing time but not the money? Really?
And why are people suddenly talking the guy down? Before the trade it was apparent that most here thought he could help the Hawks. Now he’s a bum? I’m not buying it. Dude has good offensive skills, can run the floor (don’t we want the Hawks to run more?), and can pass the ball. He needed work on his defense, but you can’t teach 6-11 and agile.
And ok, let’s accept that it was all about playing time. If Anderson is “stuck behind ZaZa”, well so will any other big they sign. Is another big going to want to come here? Why would he if the Hawks have already signaled that there are not valuable playing time to found for another big man?
Ok, riddle me this (yes I stole that from Ray), if Al, Josh, and ZaZa, were not enough to overcome the frontlines of the Magic(first game notwithstanding) and Cavs last season, why the heck isn’t there playing time for another big man?
Are we saying that Anderson would not have played more than Morris?
The Rockets seem to evaluate players very well.When you think of dufus organizations, the Rockets isn’t among them. They got over on a GM that some believe is the best in the NBA when they got Scola for a song. Funny how they think Anderson was good enough to start and play the 5 for them, but here he can’t get enough minutes on a team that needs to get bigger?
Something is missing.
Go Hawks!!
PD
July 15th, 2009
11:39 am
Yo Daniel Bass is gone (Orlando) Wilcox would be a good look
Ken
July 15th, 2009
11:40 am
If Josh Smith takes a step back this year, we need to seriously look into trading him to Golden State and get Anthony Randolph. The kid is sick, he can already handle the rock and is just as good a shooter already. Plus he blocks shots, rebounds and is younger and less of a headache!
ksleezy
July 15th, 2009
11:46 am
Yo Sekou, I’d love to hear about the Hawks’ plans for Cenk Akyol. Can u ask ur sources? Anyone in Hawksville asking about Chris Wilcox?
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
11:47 am
kirk- a season of significant playing time in the NBA IS enough insentive for a guy coming from Europe. One season in the NBA is enough to improve his stock around the league.
Gee Daniel I think Childress would disagree with you. Apparently playing for the money in Europe is a much greater incentive than playing in the NBA. Josh could have played this season past season and then cashed in as an unrestricted FA. But off he went to Europe anyway. But now we’re supposed to believe that the opposite is true for Anderson, it’s better for him to play in the NBA, than to make more money in Europe?
I’m not seeing how that works. It seems to be a double standard.
Go Hawks!!
OzinATL
July 15th, 2009
11:53 am
Right on KirkKinga. Always funny how opinions change after the fact. If he is good enough for the Rockets, surely he is good enough for the Hawks bench. I know we are rehashing this, but it could turn out to be a significant trade for both organizations for the upcoming season. Or it could turn out to be a no issue.
Whatever the case, it’ll be interesting to see how much he signs for the Rockets.
All we want is good information and the truth.
Guys, I’m not so sold on Wilcox. For a guy drafted #8 overall, to only average 9.3 points and 5.4 rebounds in 5 NBA seasons playing for not so good teams (meaning he gets plenty of playing time and more freedom than better teams so his stats should be far greater than they are). This is a guy who was once traded for Vladimir Radmanovic – ouch.
From what I’ve heard about Wilcox, he never shows up for a full season and seems to play particularly well around contract time.
He has talent for sure but seems another case of unfulfilled potential.
And what would be his price?
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
12:01 pm
Kirk,
I would have liked to see Andersen here. But from his perspective, if he can get a consistent 20 minutes a game this season, he gets a chance to show his talent, and hopefully get a bigger contract next time.
If he came to the Hawks, he would play 8-10 minutes a game (unless someone got hurt), and maybe he felt thats not enough time on the court to show what he can do. So from his perspective, I understand his reasoning.
The more PT he gets, the better his chances for more money on his next contract. (His agents probably looked at those DNPCD that Solomon Jones got, along with his inconsistent minutes, and decided they would be better off somewhere else).
Whichever big we get has to realize that they wont get much minutes, so the Hawks might have to overpay for a veteran big, but I think the hawks are more likely to sign a Foyle or someone like that.
On another note, I heard Chills’ Greek team offered Nate Robinson a 2 year deal…
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
12:14 pm
PD- thanks for the update. just got back from vacation, so I guess I am behind. Kinda of a shame that he is in Orlando, I really like his game. I honestly wanted him more than Wilcox, but what will be will be.
I just hope they resign Marvin(obvious) and still add a front court player. They seem to have set themselves up for that kind of move. I just get nervous about money saving plans.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
12:18 pm
O’Brien nailed it. People here don’t get that Andersen needed to WANT to come here. Unlike NBA guys who are free agents like Wilcox and Gooden, Andersen had a guaranteed contract for $3M that he could return to in Europe. He was NOT going to give that up to play 10-15 minutes a game for us. And that IS all he would have played. Al and Josh are going to get at least 34 minutes a night. Zaza is getting 18-20. That leaves about 10-15 minutes up for grabs at PF and C.
Andersen is 29. He wasn’t gonna have too many more seasons where he could come over and have a shot to be a consistent rotation player in the NBA. Once Zaza was signed, he wasn’t coming here. I know some people won’t accept that, but it’s the reality of the situation he was in. And if you don’t believe me, just read what Sekou wrote in his above posts…
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
12:20 pm
Calm down my people. Sund is doing what a responsible GM should be doing, being SHREWD and having direction. In the NBA you can’t spend irresponsibly. Little signings like Speedy Claxton $6m and having Acie sit the bench at $2m KILLS FRANCHISES!! So even if we don’t get ALL the players we WANT, if the team is built responsibly like it is shaping up we remain flexible with a young, athletic, competitive team.
All that being said, ALL OF THE TEAMS THAT ARE COMPETITIVE HAVE FOLLOWED THIS MOTTO. LA, SA, ORL, BOS, CLEV, and even PORT. Sign Marvin at a reasonable price tag bcuz I don’t see a better upgrade for the money, unless SUND pulls a sign and trade for Caron Butler (no $ to do that). We need 10 solid players and 2-3 reserves (hopefuls). We have 8 now: MB, JJ, MW, JS, & AH with JC, ZaZa, & Maurice off the bench. I say sign Flip (we can run small ball with JJ at the 3 & JC at the 2) and a big like Drew Gooden or Wilcox who have both proven not worthy of their draft status’ but GREAT bench contributors. Those moves allow us to compete this year and most importantly for the next 6-8 years!
tjhook
July 15th, 2009
12:21 pm
why didn’t Atlanta try to get one of the 6′7 guys on Houston’s roster? Houston’s roster has been littered with them. And they needed a true big man. You mean they couldn’t give us one banger? We need to cash in those considerations and get a player.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
12:22 pm
Kirk- I get you on the whole Anderson’s “not that good thing”, that is kinda fishy. But, I can see from the Hawk’s perspective that if the guy didn’t want to come here, then they were able to get some value for him. I agree that the idea of playing for the Hawks “loaded” front court being seen as a hinderance is a little strange also. I dunno either the move is made as a business savy move to improve the team(i.e. they parlay the cash into another player) or it is a move made on the cheap. We will see. I am going to ride with Sekou on this. He alwyas gives us the straight skinny without being a Hawks mouthpiece. So he gets the benefit of the doubt from me. Although, I do see where you are coming from.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
12:26 pm
OzinATL- I too share your concerns about Wilcox, but the flip side of that argument is that you can get a more talented player at a lower price. Also, being in a winning orginization (can we say that yet?) might help motivate him. He is worth a 3 milion for 2-3years to me.
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
12:35 pm
By the way my people, $4.5mill should not guarantee ZaZa’s position as #1 backup center/forward. If you ask me we should be looking with an open eye, for someone to compete for his minutes. If Andersen and his camp didn’t feel he could even do that…get the hell on! Randolph is about robotic as they come but I saw him play Dwight Howard in High School (great game) and he very much held his own. I also saw Josh, Dwight, and Morris play together on the ATL Celtics (talk about a draw dropping team)and although Morris was 3rd best on the team he wasn’t far behind. My point is he is 23 and some players develop faster than others. At $850k I pray he is the the guy that can push for time. Not probable but possible.
KJ
July 15th, 2009
12:37 pm
Ken, GS isn’t going to give up their best young player for a bigger contract guy after a down season, in your hypothetical scenario above… Would be awesome, though. That kid is tearing up summer league and will tear up the League when he gets minutes.
As for anyone bashing the Hawks for their role in the Childress saga, you need to stop. We offered him an incredibly fair contract last offseason that he declined. He didn’t want the $5-6 MM a year we offered then, and that’s his loss (well, except for the fact that he is getting mad money in Europe instead). He won’t get a bigger contract next offseason, not when the cap drops 10 percent. Guys like him, the mid-level guys, are going to get crushed next offseason. He made a miscalculation that will alter his whole career IMO. If he is happy in Europe, then no worries, but he may never get an offer as good as the one the Hawks gave him last year. Everyone seems to forget that the Hawks did come through and bring the money they needed to to the table.
I MUS.WRITE
July 15th, 2009
12:39 pm
Enuff of David Anderson already…….. the man doesnt fit what we need so he was shown the door. AL and Josh dont get many touches -so why would DA- He’s a Pick n pop type yada yada- so what if he shoots well for a bigman -with Bibby,JJ,Craw, Teague,Mo all gunning away it doesnt matter he wouldnt get a chance to shoot much.
We need goonz plain and simple and DA is a euro softee that does’nt mix it up. Why would we bring this guy in to Play Solo’s minutes …..8-10 minutes a game and numerous DNP’s coaches decision……..
Bench player is what he is and getting a high second for the guy plus 2 mill is a good deal imo…… why hold his rights for another 4/5 years – Get what we can and call it a day.
Dont like what im hearing and reading about Wilcox -good athlete/talent but doesnt show for stretches of the season……. Dam ,we have enuff problems with our own players in that area………
get me Jamal Magloire -that dude knows his role and all he wants to do is smash sumbody… Ask ZAZA how physical Mags is….. besides he’s a cool guy and wouldnt be a locker room problem.
Dam it …… Lamar Odom is not coming here!!!! Jeezuz
Neither is Stoudamire Bosh or any of these other names being thrown around randomly…….. How the hell r we gonna sign these guys with no real muney to work with.
Anthony Rudolph …………………………….That boi got game -wouldnt trade Josh but maybe Marvin……A 6′11 SF with great handle /athleticism ……That would be nasty
Bibby,JJ,Rudolph,Smoove,Al
Austin Daye will be a longer better version of Tayshaun Prince.
OzinATL
July 15th, 2009
12:47 pm
Maglorie would fill a role on the cheap for 10 minutes a game. Plus, he has another 6 hard fouls to give per game and practices would be a little more intense.
In about 4 years, Austin Daye will be some player. Who will benefit from that is the question?
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
12:48 pm
We here in Houston love this trade. We got a 3 point shooting 5 to space the floor. Who can pass and dribble. This was a good trade for both teams. Woodson does not play the type of offensive adelman plays. Which for years he has been trying to run and gun.Except with Yao it was hard to do. Now this make us a run and gun offensive explosive team with brooks,ariza,landry, kyle lowery and scola with anderson and maybe waffer coming back. Yes we lost yao and mcshady no mcgrady. But we were able to blow out the lakers 2 games in Houston with that type of offense minus a 5 who could shoot. Add that to the mix even at 25 min a game and you have a sleeper in Houston like the suns of a few years back. Defense is Andersons liability ofcourse. The problem is that in the Nba you only have 3 or 4 bigs who can create a match problem for him stoudamire,shaq,superman, and maybe duncan if healthy thats 10 games at the most. I think we got a key component to what Rick Adelman has always wanted and never had. A guy who can run and gun with his other teammates and pop up and shoot,dribble, and most importantly space the floor. I will take Brooks,Waffer,Ariza,Scola,Anderson over the Hawks any day. thats not including landry,and lowery coming of the bench. good luck beating the magic,cavs,celtics,pistons,Heat giving Away guys who could shoot is that not the whole purpose of being able to play in the nba. I see guys saying he can’t defend our block shots. Ok well you need theo ratliff what did he do for you in the past. I rest my case
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
12:51 pm
I’ve read the Houston blogs. I know y’all think that Andersen is the second coming of Dirk Nowitzki. I guess you never watched the Olympics last summer if you think that…
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
12:52 pm
And anyone who would take Brooks, Wafer, Ariza, Scola, and Anderson over Bibby, JJ, Marvin, Josh, and Horford is smoking some powerful peyote.
Crickets
July 15th, 2009
12:54 pm
Chirp, chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp chirp
Ken
July 15th, 2009
12:54 pm
I agree that Chris Wilcox is a little over-hyped. He took advantage of a great final year in college and got drafted higher than he should’ve. He doesn’t have the mental make up to be the player that his talent suggests. That being said, since we only need him as a 8th or 9th man off the bench I think it’d be good to get him in a low 2 yr deal.
Mike B.
July 15th, 2009
12:59 pm
your pimps in Houston:
“I will take Brooks,Waffer,Ariza,Scola,Anderson over the Hawks any day. thats not including landry,and lowery coming of the bench”
What you’re on has to be illegal in all 50 states. Please stop ASAP. Public Service Announcement.
OzinATL
July 15th, 2009
1:07 pm
Ken, I understand where your coming from but already the dude has questionable desire (as you suggested “He doesn’t have the mental make up to be the player that his talent suggests”) and i can only see this getting worse under Woody – which really, doesn’t help at all.
Now, if he is able to get on the same page as everyone else, very good pick up.
Ken
July 15th, 2009
1:19 pm
Oz, I see where you’re coming from. I agree, but maybe being on a succesful team will rejuvenate him and make him want to step it up. Really, I would have loved to have gotten Channing Frye, especially for the money he signed for. The big man market is drying up fast though and it’s getting to be slim picking. Don’t want to put my hopes in Garret Siler.
The Truth
July 15th, 2009
1:19 pm
your pimps in Houston
Regarding Anderson, either you are the pimp or you are a high-class 2M cash prostitute. I think the latter. We shall see
OzinATL
July 15th, 2009
1:30 pm
Frye was cheap, and is essentially, an NBA already proven Andersen.
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
1:32 pm
NIREMETAL No we dont think he will be Dirk Nowitzki at all. He probaly compares to a scrub on the Houston Bench called brian cook the most. From the video I have seen. The difference is that Brain Cook can shoot 3’s and thats it. Anderson can shoot,dribble,pass and run the floor something that can create a match up problem for certain teams. The Utah jazz kicked our ass in the playoffs becuase okur would take Yao out the lane and and allow his teammates to drive and shoot and if Yao stayed he would drain the 3. This guy could of helped you guys if you plan on playing the way the rockets played in the playoffs against the lakers run and gun. Except the hawks have like 4 guys that play the same position. We showed what we can do when playin up tempo and Anderson can only help. For 2 million dollars and a 2nd round pick protected. How can you loose. We spent 9 million in the draft buying 3 2nd round picks. Which all 3 look like they might help the rockets specially chase budinger from Arizona who might be able to do the same for us as anderson at the 3 or 4 spot. Which is shoot at a high percentage. Remember our Gm Darryl Morey is a money ball numbers guy he does calculations to determine what guys have the best formula to produce he invented that in Mit along with some other smart punks. We lost our best player in MCgrady our 2nd best player in Yao and we still almost beat the lakers. With the role players so called. The problem is taht they are not role players they are stars. You add a 3 point shooting monter like ariza in the mix and a 3 point shooting 5 like anderson. To a already good 3 point shooting team that can run and is young. you can only go up. Plus we have defensive guys like chuck hayes and shane battier and lowery. so remember you guys in the Atl heard it here 1st rockets 2010 Nba most suprising team. Good coach Good owner Good gm. Good shooting players with great defenders is Moreys formula and it works.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
1:32 pm
The best part is that he forgot Battier, who’s probably their best player now that Yao and T-Mac are out. Hell, he was probably their best player besides Yao even when everyone was healthy…
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
1:32 pm
CajunStorm- When the best thing you can say about a player who is 23 is that he used to be good in high school, tells you everything you need to know about Randolph Morris. He is never going to be any good. Sorry to crush your hopes.
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
1:34 pm
One mistake I think SUND is making is Woody’s contract situation. I’m not a fan of Woody bcuz my high school coach had more imagination than him but I can’t see a disciplined team with a lame duck coach. Can you imagine the problems Josh and Woody will have.
Scenario: Woody-”Hey Josh, I need you to stop taking those 3’s and be aggressive to the basket. Come on buddy, you can do it.”
Josh – “F U you lame duck S.O.B. What you going do if I don’t with your LAME AZZ? Get outta my face Woody or I’ll tank it and have you gone before the All Star game!”
That sounds about right. Blow Woody outta here and take the 2 mill in cash from H-Town and absorb the cost. I’ll take the Lil Man from my Alma Mater (Southern University) Avery Johnson….NOW!! Hell, Dallas still owes him $8 mill over the next 2 years. Anything less than $4mill a year from the Hawks and DALLAS has to pick up the tab. HELLO…DALLAS HAS TO PICK UP THE DIFFERENCE!!! Don’t get Avery twisted. What he did in Dallas was a GREAT JOB. Then the world found out that Dirk is a girl. He soured with Cuban bcuz Avery wanted Dirk gone and Cuban shipped Devin Harris away instead. Who was right on that one? Avery, no question!! NOBODY will talk back to Avery. He’s got the Napoleon complex thing going and he’s from New Orleans!! He’s got a box cutter with him at all times, I GUARANTEE!!!
Ken
July 15th, 2009
1:34 pm
Hey Sekou,
Are there any big men of substance still available? For what the hawks need (only 10 to 15 m/g) I’d think there would still be some viable candidates. Some guys that they won’t have to break the bank on, besides Randmo, West and them.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
1:34 pm
Niremental- I was wondering the same thing about Battier. I actually went to make sure he was still on their roster. What an idiot.
Also, didn’t Houston lose another pretty good player? What is his name again? oh, yeah Artest.
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
1:42 pm
I can’t speak for Mark Bradley folks. He has a blog for that. And he’s entitled to his own opinions about the Hawks.
I don’t think that Andersen’s trade signals any end to the Hawks’ summer activity (beyond a resolution to Marvin’s situation). They are still in active pursuit of big man help.
And you all have to draw your own conclusions from the things you read (not that you don’t do that already) about this Andersen situation and anything else.
OzinATL
July 15th, 2009
1:44 pm
CajunStorm. Woody really is a liability on this team. You can say hey, we’ve made the playoffs 2 years in a row, but honestly, how many of you can say that was due to Woody. Josh Smith should have developed into an All-Star by now with all his talent, but under Woody, no, he keeps making mistakes that should’ve been coached out of his game by now. JJ is worn down by the end of the season so his iso don’t work. Essentially, resigning Bibby meant resigning a point guard and coach in one. I can only hope Steve Smith is helping Josh take his game to the next level.
Avery would be a good choice – at least better than our current coach.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
1:45 pm
Thanks Sekou-
But we count on you to give us the inside information to the workings of the Hawks orginization. So when two columnist have different views on something as significant as the team direction, well we need answers. BTW, Bradley has already moved on to rehashing the Texteria trade.
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
1:49 pm
If you guys watched Rockets games at all which it seems like you didnt you would know that battier is not a starter. He comes of the bench shoots a couple of 3’s and defends. He is happy with being a role player. He is not a go to guy. The problem is that you guys have not had good Basketball in 25 years since Domique in his prime and. All of a sudden you have a couple of descent years in a league where 37 and 45 can get you in the playoffs. So you think that your great. You have 3 guys in Williams,crawford,bibby who play the same spot and a coach who doesn’t understand his roster. So just hope you guys finish 5 in the east and lose in 1st our 2nd round. Thats your maximun upside. Where the ROCKETS know they can beat the champs because they almost did. And thats without there 2 best players.
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
1:51 pm
Hey Daniel, you are right! Morris is a Big Robot who has probably regressed since high school. But fa real though, 23 yrs old used to be rookie age. But at less then a million a year, I challenge anyone to tell me he wouldn’t average at least 4pts and 4.5 rebs if he played almost 13 minutes a game!!!
Why do I bring up those numbers? Because that’s what “the prized” Marcin Gortat averaged, who is 2 years older than Morris, and just signed for over $6,000,000/ yr!!1 Come on, folks that is the reality of this game and we’re not playing with MONOPOLY Money!!
Is Morris and Solo the answers? I don’t know, but for the money they are steals…..if WOODY would play them in an organized system. I’m more convinced that Woody can’t do the job, rather than the players we have. DID YOU HEAR THAT MR. SUND?
Anakin Joe
July 15th, 2009
1:52 pm
I thought that Bradley said that the Hawks wouldn’t likely make a “significant” move. Look, I think that we only have 10-11 players signed, obviously, Sund HAS to get a few more players.
So if a guy in Europe could see that he wouldn’t get more than token minutes, are Gooden, Wilcox and Joe Smith unaware of the situation? So this brings us back to a player who is willing to take not only a low salary but minimum playing time.
HawkKingBibby
July 15th, 2009
1:55 pm
BRIAN SKINNER would be a solid add. Ike Diago and Wilcox as well.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 15th, 2009
1:55 pm
Your pimps in Houston seems like he’s been spending too much time with the late, great Pimp C. Put down that purple drank for a while, fam. Y’all are winning 35 games max. Don’t take it too hard though — add a lottery pick to that core and get Yao healthy again and the Rockets are looking like contenders again in 2011.
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
1:56 pm
add joe johnson thats 4 players in the same position. What a joke you guys deserve napolean avery johnson as your coach. A houston guy who might know what to do with 4 point guards/2guards. It would take a Houston midget to fix the problems you idiots have with that roster in ATL.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 15th, 2009
1:59 pm
“If you guys watched Rockets games at all which it seems like you didnt you would know that battier is not a starter. ”
In the last 5 seasons, Battier has only come off the bench 11 times, total, according to basketball-reference.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
2:01 pm
All the good bigs are gone. We’re scrwed. Our front line is gonna get punished again this season. Just sign siler and be done with it…..
Flip&G.Green Call it a day man…..
Najeh Davenpoop
July 15th, 2009
2:04 pm
Count on the Ball Don’t Lie blog on Yahoo Sports to give us stories like this…
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
2:05 pm
….sorry, just had one of those momnets heh!
GO HAWKS!!!!!
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
2:06 pm
POOP HEAD regardless of what you think. He started due to injuries to Mcgrady and artest. he was coming of the bench and thats what he is a defensive specialist role player not a go to guy. He can shoot 3’s to. He will provide depth for the rockets. I was hoping for more from him. Thats all to it. He will never be what he he was for duke. I know you have a crush on him but get a grip.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
2:07 pm
We needed a physical big that had LENGTH, I thought Frye could provide that. We have bigs, we just neede a LONG & PHYSICAL one for rebounding pourposes. We failed in that particular dept.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
2:08 pm
In Wilcox’s defense he did Average 14ppg in back-to-back seasons. 05-06 I beleive…
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
2:11 pm
Pimps In Houston talking about ‘protection’ on the 2nd round pick? Whaahhh?
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
2:13 pm
OzinAtl you have been hitting good points all day. Development is what I’ve been preaching. Develop Morris, Solo, and Othello. Sign Marvin and another Big (Drew Gooden is who I want) and stay flexible. We all know rhat we are limited in finance but The Spirit Group is putting up adequate funds. Now we MUST develop what we have!! I know it’s a different sport but the New England Patriots have never been in Salary Cap trouble even though are as dominate as they are. Good talent evaluation, never overpaying, good direction, development of homegrown talent, and GOOD COACHING is the key to success in ANY BUSINESS!! The Hawks are close, so don’t panic Mr. Sund and complete the puzzle!!
Nookah
July 15th, 2009
2:14 pm
I really don’t think us Hawk fans have anything to worry about regarding the Anderson trade. He ain’t no Scola nor Pau. Someone said it best, he may be a poor man’s Okur and that’s abject poverty. He may be able to jack them from the perimeter and play the pic & roll but his defense is suspect and that would not be a good fit for us especially if he wanted to play ahead of Zaza. Ain’t gonna happen under Woody. Perhaps Adleman can teach him some serviceable defense.
Don’t get me wrong, he may not be a bad player but at 29 years old and not wanting to play here, what was Sund to do? It’s very simple, if you have an asset that is stuck in inventory, why not liquidate it for cost or better yet (as we did in this case), cost + $2M + “ther assets (”future considerations). That’s a good deal in my opinion. The real comparison will be to see what Anderson does with Houston compared to what Sund will spend the $2m on plus (and don’t forget this), who or what will we get with that 2nd round pick from Houston and don’t forget “future considerations” has been included in the deal.
In short, all things considered we traded a 29 year old 2nd round pick with significant Euroleague experience who has what, 5 or 6 years left in the NBA, vs. $2M + Houston’s future 2nd round + future considerations (whatever those are).
Drop the sentiment and the emotions and look at this deal as if it was another team other than our Hawks, wouldn’t you consider this a steal? I think Sund just picked Houston’s pocket but we won’t be able to fully conclude that until we see the tangible assets we will get in return.
Sund you are the man. Bring on the surprise big!!!
Go Hawks!!!
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
2:23 pm
Yes 2nd round protected ladies. Again protected 2nd round pick. For you ignorant folks who think houston got robbed or picked pocketed. That means if we go 0-82 and we get the 1st pick othe 2nd round you dont get it. You will get a late back of the 2nd round pick in any year to come maybe 2018 or so. Those pickes usually make great european prospects 10 years down the road or stars in the nba developement league. Good luck future considerations means you might or might not get considered for some more cash maybe ladies you can get a 7 year old from china now. lol lol lol lol
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
2:25 pm
Those yahoo comments from RJ calling off his marrage are halarious!!!
Clyde
July 15th, 2009
2:29 pm
FIRE WOODY
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
2:32 pm
protected 2nd round pick ladies
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
2:40 pm
There’s a difference Daniel. Mark is a columnist and I’m the beat writer, so at times we’re going to give you two very different things. But I understand where you are coming from. I’m as interested to read all of your opinions around here as I am anyone else’s.
I mean, what team isn’t going to try and sell a trade as the best thing since … well, whatever. Every team is looking at the upside of a deal.
Dekaturkingz
July 15th, 2009
2:44 pm
Houston will be lucky to get 30 wins. You guys have Tissue Paper Players. Yao Wunfoot Ming & Tracy Band-Aid McGrady. lol
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
2:48 pm
LOL @ Wunfoot & Band-Aid Hehehehehe!!!
I MUS.WRITE
July 15th, 2009
3:01 pm
U gotta be kidding me …….Our starting line would smash those guys. All tho Brooks -Scola- Ariza are nice players.
Anderson didnt even start for the Aussie National Team and this is the guy thats suppose to take yall to the promise land -thatz funny…
Pimp out in Houston or whateva u call urself-I cant wait to play yall this year -when we do and yall take an azz whoopn I want you to come back here and be heard …..
HTown ………HOMER David Anderson….. HAHAHAHA U kill’n me dude……
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
3:01 pm
“Probably a smart decision in the long run. I can’t think of any other reason to be a sports dancer than they’re trying to track down a pro athlete..They don’t make that much money, there’s no real future in it, so what’s it going to lead to? She may have been honest and sincere, but these guys make so much money it’s hard to know what a woman is really after. I would suggest very long engagements for pro athletes, and don’t shower them with money and things, then you’ll see what they really want.”
I Agree!!!!
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
3:02 pm
Sekou – as ‘beat writer’ how about more detail about the trade – your article said: ‘a future 2nd round pick’ – so what is the year, and what is the protection (if any)? And what are the ‘future considerations’?
If they won’t say, fine – but we would expect you to be inquiring about these ‘beat’ details…. These Houston folks seem to have more info than we do.
Ben
July 15th, 2009
3:09 pm
Excellent post Mountain Jim. Yeah what year is the pick and what are future considerations?
I MUS.WRITE
July 15th, 2009
3:11 pm
Dekaturking……You wild’n out dude -that was funny LOL
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
3:15 pm
I googled and apparently what Sekou reported is the same as what most else have ‘undisclosed 2nd round pick, Cash, and future considerations’
Why is Sund not releasing all the details of the trade?
I MUS.WRITE
July 15th, 2009
3:16 pm
Dam RJ -That was uncalled for if u knew u didnt want to marry her -U shoulda nixed those ideas from the beginin.. just a bunch of time and energy wasted …..Im straight up so theres never a grey area –
guesswhosthis
July 15th, 2009
3:19 pm
why does everyone keep crying for more bigs? everyone keeps thinking about how we can match up with boston, orlando, and cleveland. the fact of the matter is we can not match up to them no matter how many more big men we get. we can’t beat them at their game. we need to play to our strengths, not theirs. with our team, we need to play with a lot of energy, lots of hustle, and more importantly lots heart and pride. all those things translates into good defense and that inturn translates into lots of fastbreak opportunities. we don’t need more bigs to play that way. we just need athletic unselfish players with a lot of heart. we already have the athletic players we need. the unselfishness and playing with a lot of heart and pride, well thats for coach woodson to bring out of his players. imagine running our team with bibby at the point, crawford at the 2, jj at small forward, smith at power forward, and horford at center. then the bench would consist of teague at the point, murray at shooting guard, evans at small forward, williams at power forward, and zaza at center. now forget about how we can match up to other teams. how are other teams going to match up to us? it’s simple. they can’t. we’re just going to be driving the other teams crazy with stingy defense and they can’t keep up with us on the breaks. that’s how this team will be siccessfull. we need to establish our own identity. knight and partially sund already built the team to accomplish that. now its up to woodson to bring them to life.
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
3:21 pm
Stuck behing Zaza? Why cant he backup Smoove at pf? But what’s done is done. Now I can only hope that we plan on using that extra 2 mill on a guy like Gooden or Wilcox.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
3:27 pm
Thanks Sekou.. You do a great job. Seriously, man I was on vaca for 4 days and was going through withdrawls.
CajunStorm- Man, I totally hear you on the whole Gortat thing. Orlando is totally pulling a Dallas, where they got close, then panic and make too many moves, paying too much money for mid/low level players. They will end up chasing the playoffs just like the Mavs. But dude, Randolph Morris may be one of the worst basketball players I have EVER seen. He is literally an eyesore when on the court. Solo as your 11th/developmental guy and Mario as your 12th energy/ra ra guy fine. I can work with that. But RandMo at any amount of money which doesn’t include him cleaning up afterwards is overpaying. Literally the oxygen that he breathes is more valuable than his basketball skills.
Daniel
July 15th, 2009
3:30 pm
Alright guys here is a question for you at the same money who do you want Gooden or Wilcox?
Dekaturkingz
July 15th, 2009
3:30 pm
I MUS.WRITE , Just Representing For The Home Team.
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
3:31 pm
Mark, it’s Horford, not Hartford for crying out loud. Come on now. Must be a newbie jumping on the Hawks bandwagon. lol!!!
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
3:31 pm
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/Richard-Jefferson-gets-cold-feet-leaves-bride-a;_ylt=AlpGR4OvDdY4FnwKc5omUvo5nYcB?urn=nba,176702
I know somebody poted this, but I don’t see it anymore soo…
cp
July 15th, 2009
3:32 pm
It seems like every guy we don’t sign here people want to make that guy into a better player than he actually is. Andersen is a soft big who does not rebound or play defense and last time I checked we needed someone who could. The guy did not want to be here after we signed Pachulia. We cant force guys to come here we can only offer them a deal. It is up to that player if they want to be here or not. I think it was a good deal for us. Brian Skinner would be a nice pick up for this team. Give me Gerald Green over Mario…….On a side note, Law is really struggling with the Warriors. I hope the kid gets it together.
your pimps in Houston
July 15th, 2009
3:33 pm
word has it that HAKEEM “THE DREAM” will be working with Anderson, too.
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
3:36 pm
Kirk, why could’nt Ole Woodrow just put Anderson in when we needed offense, if he doesn’t play good defense? Put Horford or Zaza back on the floor on the defensive end. No what I mean?
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
3:36 pm
*posted
Mike
July 15th, 2009
3:38 pm
At 7 ft tall Andersen averaged only 4 boards a game in the Euroleague. He also was invisible in the playoffs. He can hit a baseline jumper, but he wouldn’t have solved any problems for the Hawks in the paint.
Also, people shouldn’t ignore the $2 million. That may be the difference between getting a serviceable big man as a back-up and not. Some of these teams have nearly unlimited resources, but the Hawks don’t. If they had just traded Andersen for a guy like Wilcox straight up it wouldn’t look bad; the money may make the difference in getting a guy like that.
Any word, Sekou, on what the “additional future considerations” first mentioned were, other than a 2nd round pick?
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
3:42 pm
One thing we fail to take into account, (as previously mentioned). Andersen is in a similar position like Chills. If he doesnt want to play for the Hawks, he can go back overseas and make his $2 or $3 mil salary regardless.
The veteran NBA big will accept a contract from an NBA team, because that’s their best option. Plus the veteran NBA big has made their millions already, so they might be more willing to take $2 mil knowing they’re roles will be limited.
tb,
There is not many minutes behind Josh at PF, because sometimes Al plays PF while ZaZa plays center. But I agree with you. I hope we bring in an established veteran big like Drew Gooden or Wilcox. heck, I’d even take old Joe Smith. We need more bigs to throw at Howard-Gortat-Bass/Shaq-Big Z-Varajeo/KG-Perkins-Rasheed etc.
(And lets face it. If Woody was a better coach, he would have an offensive scheme that forces other teams to play our game. Instead, we end up playing their game). And although to be a good running team, you must play defense and rebound, but even on a made FG, you can still push the ball up court. I still think the Hawks need to run more, and we need an offensive identity (not iso JJ).
Lets hope Woody brings in an assistant who maximizes our offensive identity.
cp
July 15th, 2009
3:55 pm
I was just reading an article the Mercury news did on Law. They say he is out of shape, has no confidence, the Warriors will probably not pick up his option so he will probably be used as an expiring contract. Ariose if you can find the story link that for me. I was hoping the kid could turn it around but its not looking good for him at all. What happened to the captain clutch Law from college? He cant blame Woodson for this. I cant lie I was one of the guys on Woodsons case for not playing him but it looks like I might have to eat some crow for this one.
MannyT
July 15th, 2009
3:56 pm
Melvin, in response to your question this morning, the luxury money is redistributed among the teams that did not go over the cap. I am not sure, but I think it was a little under 3 mil for this past season that a team gets if under the lux tax.
BWAF
MannyT
July 15th, 2009
4:01 pm
For all the reasons you want to play the Andersen thing in a similar light to Chills situation, I have to disagree. Chills was here and left for a better financial opportunity. Some of you rip him for choosing more money in a lesser league.
Andersen never was here. Now there is stain on him because he wants a better chance to get minutes if he comes over to the better league. He’s older and doesn’t have the career time to wait on the bench to gain the confidence of a new coach. If he is gong to make an impression, he needs a chance to play. While nothing is guaranteed, it is a fact that Houston needs big men right now–so he is likely to get a better shot there. The Hawks just came off their best season in this century–I don’t see Woody wanting to throw a new guy into the mix as quickly.
The good side of this as basketball fans is that we can see what the 2002 pick is like in the NBA. Good for the fans.
BWAF
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
4:04 pm
We should’ve traded Andersen’s rights to Boston in a S&T for Glen Big Baby Davis. He wouldn’t get any PT there but who cares, he’s a scrub and we’re tying to gain some ground in the East.
Speaking of Big Baby, I wonder if there was any way to get him without Boston matching the offer, that doesn’t involve us giving up too much(Siler, Randolph, Mario etc..)
Just some wishful thinking.
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
4:05 pm
O’Brien, I understand what you are saying and it sounds good. While you may have “nailed it” for those fans who have zero intellectual curiosity about the trade, I remain unconvinced and let me tell you why.
There are some here who build arguments around the fact that Anderson made $3 million playing in Europe and that he didn’t want to give that up to play less minutes for the Hawks. Of course others have argued that he made $3 million and that minutes, not money were the incentive for his asking for a trade. Still others argue that the Rockets provide him a showcase for his talents from which he will earn handsome sums in the future.
According to Houston Chronicle:
The Rockets expect to sign Andersen using a portion of the mid-level exception remaining after they were able to use the disabled player exception to sign Trevor Ariza.
A reasonable inference can be drawn that since he is only getting a “portion” of the residual MLE allotment,that he may not be making substantially more than he was making in Europe and could possibly make less. One would certainly think that he would command the full MLE if the argument is he wouldn’t just leave his guaranteed $3 million dollars. At any case, his salary demand doesn’t seem to be as high as some suggest in their arguments.
The argument that he wanted to go play somewhere where he could get more minute sounds good, but doesn’t withstand the slightest bit of intellectual rigor.Players salaries do not always rest on a purely rational basis in professional sports. This argument is the biggest failure as it is thoroughly and completely debunked by recent events.
I give you Marcin Gortat. He averaged 6.8 minutes in 6 games during 07-08. In only 63 games this season he averaged…wait for it…12.6 minutes ppg! (3.8 ppg along with 4.5 rpg). If the argument that Anderson could not reap a salary windfall playing only 10-15 minutes ppg as a Hawk is a sound one, how does one explain Mr. Gorat signing for 5 years $34 million? He was coveted by a number of teams, so it wasn’t just the Magic that saw value in paying a guy who plays about a quarter’s worth of minutes a game, when he even plays in a game.
So while I can understand that any given player may not want to play for a certain team, I am still left with unanswered questions about Anderson and the Hawks. Seems to me that if his concern was playing time and future earnings, all the Hawks had to do was point to Gorat, or even Ariza who has never average 20 minutes ppg. Not to mention, they could have paid him more than he is likely to get from the Rockets.
Also left unanswered is how is it that we don’t have more minutes available for another big man. I thought most here have expressed a preference for another “big man or two”? What happened? Now we have no minutes available? Really?
Is the word out now that the Hawks don’t have any minutes available?Why would any player want to come to a team where there aren’t any available minutes? It’s likely a player who is comfortable getting the most dollars while making the least contribution. That is not how you build a ball team.
I apologize if I am being dense, but given last season’s problems, shouldn’t the Hawks have more than just a few minutes available for a big man that can help them?
If allotting more minutes to Teague and Crawford, is a good idea to take some strain away from Bibby and JJ, then why is it we cannot have ZaZa and another quality big lessening the burden on Josh and Al? And those of you who argue that selling Anderson to the Rockets is a good thing, must by implication, believe that resigning ZaZa is enough.
I strongly disagree.
Go Hawks!!
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
4:06 pm
How about Randolph,and All the stuff we just got from Houston? Plus maybe a future 2nd of our own? For Big Baby?
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
4:12 pm
Maybe Andersen didn’t like the makeup of our team/specefic players? I know that sounds silly, but you can’t rule that out as a factor. Even though we did just make it to the semifinals.
There may have been something that his agent isn’t saying that he and Andersen have discussed behiend closed doors.
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
4:14 pm
terrell barron, Coach Woodson is really inconsequential this season. Sund saw to that first thing. But you raise a good point. What you are saying is that he could have been of some use to the Hawks. I agree. That is why I think we are missing some information.
I call b.s. on this retroactive devaluation of Anderson. No one ever said he of starter quality, but that he possessed enough skill, and length to help the Hawks against some of the frontlines that they struggled against. People expressed that evaluation during one more than one offseason too I might add.
And now he a “scrub”?
Pure squish!
Go Hawks!!
Neil
July 15th, 2009
4:16 pm
Sekou,
All of this talk about going after a big, do you know about any bigs that the Hawks have been considering or talking to?
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
4:20 pm
Daniel- You are hilarious bro! I ‘m with you though. Don’t mistake my puttin forth a case with money spent with being a R. Morris fan. He has no rythym about him. The word I’ve been using is “robotic.” Mark Madsen comes to mind. Hell, he even cost more than Morris and had about as much rythym too. LOL.
BTW- I’ll take Gooden over Wilcox. He has a better shot selection, plays better D, can play the 4 or 5, runs the floor better and is a better rebounder. Problem now is that LA is looking at him since pulling the contract from heavily overpaid Odom (another 11pt 8reb guy) just like Gooden. Hey Rick, pull the trigger on Marvin and Drew already. Don’t overspend to do it though.
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
4:21 pm
Kirk,
You made some good points, but like Sekou said, Andersen did not want to play for the Hawks. So rather than have him sit overseas again (and become a wasted 2nd round pick), trade him for other assets that we can actually use (even if its further down the road).
Likewise, Chills doesnt want to play for the Hawks, so I wish the Hawks could trade him for assets that we can actually use to benefit the Hawks. Unfortunately, the Hawks werent able to find a deal they liked for Chills.
Ariose,
I wonder if Boston will match a mid-level offer to Big Baby. For the record, although I wish we could get him, he is probably out of the Hawks price range. The Hawks are probably looking to get somebody in the $2-$3 mil price range.
CajunStorm
July 15th, 2009
4:25 pm
Dang Kirkinga…that was a long post!
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
4:25 pm
O’Brien, I think you’re right. That would be great too. Then we coulf re-sign Flip(maybe) with the remaining 2mill, Sign Gerald Green with the Bi-Annual, and re-sign Solo and Mario.
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
4:34 pm
Josh Smith for Anthony Randolph? Hahaha! Please tell me your’re joking? And Austin Daye? Please? Yall need to stop watching summer league. I know your’re bored, just like I am, but dont let that stuff go to your head. Marvin looked like Michael Jordan out there a few years ago. Not hatin on Marvin, just sayin. Hell, Von Wafer was MVP, and dropped 48 in a game, so I guess we shoula traded JJ for him? lol! And if I’m not mistaken, He tried out for the Hawks that year, and didn’t even make the team.
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
4:38 pm
Ariose,
I think you’re expecting too much. What I would like to see, is sign Drew Gooden, sign Gerald Green (low risk/high reward), and resign Solo.
We dont need Mario. He averages 5 minutes per game, in about 59 games each season. And Woody does not know how/when to use him anyway. And with both JJ and Crawford to play SG, where would Mario get his minutes? And hopefully JJ will play better defense, since he wont be required to play 40 minutes per game.
Hawksfanatic
July 15th, 2009
4:44 pm
Who cares if David Andersen becomes a great player? He wasn’t going to play here and his direct impact on the Hawks is 2 games every season. Maybe if we meet up with the Rockets in the finals one day we will say “oh dang, we shouldn’t have done that trade”, but let’s be honest that isn’t happening anytime soon.
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
4:54 pm
Interesting. Maybe that 2 mill we made today was for Woody’s buyout? lol!!
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
5:00 pm
O’Brien, you’re right we don’t realln need Rio. But he’s a nice team guy to have around lol. But i’d be just as happy with G.Green, Gooden ,and Solo.
Ken
July 15th, 2009
5:03 pm
HEy Sekou,
From Anderson trade, I understang we got a future 2nd rd pick, about 2 million cash, and future considerations? You have any idea what that is or what it means? And heard any word on Marv’s negotiations or what big men we may be looking at?
Oh, and I heard Josh Smith is out of the country, you know if he’s on vacation or training with someone in particular?
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
5:03 pm
Where is “Anderson didn’t want to play for the Hawks” coming from?
Najeh Davenpoop
July 15th, 2009
5:06 pm
Ariose, you are looking at the wrong Celtics backup big man. Big Baby will cost too much, like O’Brien said. Leon Powe, on the other hand, is coming off an ACL injury and is probably expendable to the Celtics with Rasheed Wallace in the mix. The Hawks can probably grab him for a minimum contract, and if he returns to form he is a rebounding machine.
I’d like to see the Hawks get Wilcox and then throw a couple of minimum deals (we’re talking well under $1 million) at Powe and Ime Udoka (poor man’s Childress). The good teams always find a way to grab contributors off the scrap heap that nobody else notices — kinda like the Hawks did with Flip Murray last year.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 15th, 2009
5:07 pm
“Where is “Anderson didn’t want to play for the Hawks” coming from?”
In one of Sekou’s posts earlier on this blog, he indicated that Andersen was interested in the Hawks under the assumption that Zaza would leave and he would get his minutes. When Zaza was re-signed, Andersen’s focus shifted elsewhere. I don’t remember there being a direct quote from Andersen that he didn’t want to play here, but the reasoning behind it makes sense.
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
5:07 pm
Ken, where did you hear that from? Who gives out that kind of info? Must suck to be rich and famous. Probably just some idiot using Josh Smith as an alias. Remember Ron Mexico?
terrell barron
July 15th, 2009
5:09 pm
Anderson coulda backed up Smoove. He’s more of a pf, than he is a center. IMO
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
5:15 pm
Apology accepted kirk.
mountain_jim
July 15th, 2009
5:21 pm
haha – ok Sekou what’s the details on the 2nd round pick or why won’t they disclose those details yet?
ChuckOldSchool
July 15th, 2009
5:24 pm
Hey,
First time poster. I am a Hornets fan, but I live in here Atlanta. The Hawks have been a very interesting team to follow. I have to comment on this David Andersen trade, though. I think sometimes when a team is transitioning from mediocre to possibly contending as the Hawks have done over the past two years, we tend to overvalue assets just a tad. As you get better, your frame of reference has to change. The litmus test for gauging whether or not a trade or a signing is succesful isn’t just by asking if said move makes your team better. So, what if signing Andersen makes the Hawks better? How much better? Marginally at best, if you ask me. At what cost? I think Houston is paying him somewhere around 2.5 a season for two years with a team option for a third. At the end of the day, Andersen doesn’t catapult the Hawks to Celtics, Magic, or Cavs territory nor does he add any additional separation from Miami, Toronto or Philly.
Good move by the Hawks.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
5:26 pm
I just DINGed Bradley’s latest. My god. What an idiot. But hey, if you’re gonna be a poseur, you might as well talk out of your ass in the process.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
5:38 pm
Nire,
You and Bradley may need to have a 3 round Blog Death Match… That guy sure does get under your skin. I’m sure you do the same for him as well (although he may not admit it on his blog).
Sterling Platinum
July 15th, 2009
5:39 pm
I may be crazy, but I think we can get Ben Wallace on the cheap since he was just bought out. If we can get him on the cheap, let’s do it. He would be a great backup 4 for Josh and adds defense and rebounding. I think he buckled under the pressure of a large contract, now he got his money so that shouldn’t be an issue. I believe he has something in the tank. With Brandon Bass in Orlando, the only other person I can think of is Wilcox. Maybe, if he doesn’t command as much we can use our midlevel on both he and Wallace (I’m being greedy now). Just a thought.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
5:46 pm
Melvin,
He barely watched the Hawks during the regular season. I put up the number at some point – he wrote something like 3 times as many articles about the Braves offseason than he did about the Hawks’ regular season. It’s clear he barely watched the team during the regular season. It pisses me off to no end that he writes as if he knows jack about the team as a whole based on what was probably a sample of 5-10 regular season games and 11 playoff games (the latter of which when JJ, Marvin, and Al all were hurt).
He’ll never admit it. But he and I and many other people know it’s true.
Wabe
July 15th, 2009
5:47 pm
To Dos Hawkis,
Why do you think bringing Flip back is an outrageous statement? Sund loves him, and I dont understand why having depth in the backcourt hurts..
I hate to say this, but let’s use last season as an example…
Marvin Williams missed an extended amount of games last season with injuries. IMO, he’s injury prone. By this, I mean it’s not unlikely that he could face this same issue next season. Point would be, one or two injuries could mean ‘too much depth’ turns into ‘not enough depth’.
You can’t plan for injuries. Flip offers great minutes when he comes off the bench, and I don’t think it’s outrageous to assume SUND (WHO LOVES FLIP) would bring him back for a minimal amount of money and possibly a minimal role…
There are few things the Hawks cannot plan for:
1) Injuries
2) Teague’s Production
3) How Crawford fits
You keep Flip as a safety valve, and at worst, have valued depth in the backcourt to maybe make a mid-season move to aquire something of need…
Most in here may disagree with me, and I completely understand if you think bringing him back would limit other players minutes who should get a chance to play (ACIE LAW-LIKE SITUATION). But I would think too much talent is better than not enough talent…
Wasn’t JJ complaining about being tired at the end of last season? It wouldn’t hurt to limit JJ + Bibby’s minutes through the season, keep them fresh.
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
5:48 pm
It’s a second round pick Jim, who cares? Seriously. David Andersen was drafted in 2002 and is just now on the cusp of coming to the NBA. It’s just the way business is done sometimes in the NBA. This is not some covert operation. I’m stunned by all the conspiracy theories. It’s craziness.
Free agency brings out the kook in us all, I guess. This Ben Wallace idea is intriguing, Sterling P. I do know that the Hawks have reached out in that direction but haven’t heard yet if there was any response. Wallace has options if indeed he wants to play this season. And he can be had for a nice price now that he has that $10 million buyout in his pocket.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
5:54 pm
Nire,
As much anguish you have toward Bradley, I will put my money on you in the Blog Death Match…
vava74
July 15th, 2009
6:00 pm
People, let’s be reasonable:
1. We would never contend for the title this year, regardless of ANY free agent available on the market now.
2. IF we keep our heads cool, we may contend within 2 or 3 years.
3. For this, we will need a few things:
a) Re-sign Marvin now;
b) Re-sign JJ and Crawford next year (I really think that he will fit in nicely);
c) Teague must evolve and take over from Bibby;
d) Bibby must be happy to become a vet out of the bench bringing in some steady leadership and clutch shots in controlled doses;
e) J-Smoove must realise that he is a role player (a 5-star role player, but a role player) and concentrate in: Interior defense (not only blocks), rebounding, improve shot selection.
f) Big Al must gain 15 pounds and improve his offensive reportoire.
g) Add a couple of role players or give a chance of what we have to evolve (Rio brings hustle, not only in games, when he plays, but in practice, which is also important, Solo, who has improved marginally every year, but improved, and see if Otello and Morris would evolve if permanently assigned to a NBDL team).
4. STOP DREAMING with big time/mid high level free agents because they will not come to ATL.
5. Stick with the team and things will progress.
6. Don’t bring poisonous characters like Wilcox, Stromile Swift, etc… Bring blue collar workers like Powe, the Collins brothers, etc.
The Truth
July 15th, 2009
6:01 pm
Could we please stop this whining about Anderson? He’s gone; get over it. Therefore, Sund gets an “I” for incomplete.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
6:08 pm
Tyger posted this on Bradleys blog:
“Where would we have been without Flip?
Flip – $1.5M per year = 12ppg. 2asst 1.1st. 36%-3 1.60 TO
Bibby – $14M per = 15ppg. 5asst 1.24st. 39%-3 1.62 TO
Flip outplays Bibby, but Bibby is rewarded? Flip shows up in playoffs, while Bibby disappears. Flip defends, Bibby cant.
But Bibby is a great PG and 3pt shooter? +.03% 3pt. + 3 assts. +0.14stl -.02 TO
There’s not a +$13M discrepancy btwn these players and even at $6M he’s still not worth it, unless Flip wanted more than $6M per, which is unlikely.
C’mon Sund get it right, give the money to the guys that earned it. Getting Crawdaddy for AC/Speedy was OK but not the orgasmic experience Col. Schultz makes it out to be – alot of teams would love to clear $9M off there books right now.
Is it really genius to re-sign FA off the 1st team to reach the 2nd rd. in 15 yrs??? Similar to Dimitroff, is it genius or was there no where to go but up? No coach – get a coach, No QB, get a QB – hell, I’m batting a 1.000 already. I digress, but the the Falcoons were 2-1 under HOF Emmitt Thomas!
Re-sign Flip, Solo and go get Drew Gooden, 6′10 250 – 12ppg. 7 reb. w/ low-post skills going both ways, you’re going to be active at the trade deadline anyway.”
I freaking agree!!!…
Wink
July 15th, 2009
6:09 pm
Who represents the bigs for the Atlanta Hawks, bigs that are currently signed?
We have Pachulia 6′11 -7′0, Horford 6′9 – 6′10, Josh Smith, is he a big…sure does not look like it, goes 6′8 – 6′9, who else…hmmm Marvin 6′9, or he’s a wing player, perimeter defender, and he not signed…hmmmmm.
Do we have any other bigs signed, Othello – NO, Solo – NO… or yeah we got Morris 7′0 of nothing…surly will be our 12th or 13th man on the bench, practice player.
Why is it we could not use Anderson, because he did not want to play here…hmmm. Seems Childress did not want to play here either, we maintain his rights; we could have did the same with Andersen…
With all the hoopla & praise of Sund, we have no BIGS. Truth be told, Bosh is no BIG. Rather have two solid rebounders & space eaters to protect the paint than Bosh. Guys like Brandon Bass & Paul Milsap…they are signed but Guys Like Them.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
6:15 pm
RE-SIGN FLIP!!!!! DAMMIT….
WCJ
July 15th, 2009
6:16 pm
Ben Wallace and Tim Thomas are out there. If they are not to greedy, maybe Atlanta can look them. The problem is like I said before it is about minutes. Mike Woodson does some crazy things with his rotations of hawks players. NO big man is coming to Atlanta unless Woodson can guarantee major minutes.
vava74
July 15th, 2009
6:26 pm
Ben Wallace is washed up and Tim Thomas has always been a washed up looser. Why would be add a short and rapidly aging Center (6′9”) who depended on his physical play or a tall perimeter shooter who does not defend, does not work hard and was never involved in anything resembling successful basketball (apart of a few dozen games with PHO)???
Drew Gooden is known to be an extremely dumb player who thinks he is better than he is (kind of a J-Smoove type of character).
Furthermore, he definitively does not want to come to ATL to be a bench player. He will look for a starting job on a lesser team or a bench player on a contender or in a team with a visible star and media exposure (Miami, for instance).
Dan23
July 15th, 2009
6:30 pm
I really like the Ben Wallace idea. He would bring the toughness and experience we could really use on our front line. Also, it seems that everyone agrees that we need some bigs and I understand that Sund wants to get the Williams thing done but unless I missed it, I have really not seen exactly who they are targeting. Does anybody know?
rainman34
July 15th, 2009
6:58 pm
Im sure this has been answered but why did the hawks not have a summer league team. Many guys have been discovered in summer leagues and we could have seen cenk and the latest second rounder play some with teague.
Anakin Joe
July 15th, 2009
7:06 pm
rainman34, Hawks only have 1-2 young guys to evaluate and it wasn’t worth the expense to send 10 guys to LV for a week. I understand that Teague will play with another team at a future summer league. Next week, Hawks hold a mini-camp and will invite some undrafted FAs to workout with Teague.
Here’s the article on Law, sorry if it was already posted.
http://www.mercurynews.com/sportsheadlines/ci_12839636?nclick_check=1
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
7:21 pm
Wink,
It’s hilarious that you minimize the height of every Hawks player…and suggest we should have signed two guys (Millsap and Bass) who are undersized power forwards.
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
7:23 pm
Ben Wallace will not be here. He won’t want to come here (home for him has always been the Great Lakes) and we shouldn’t want to bring in a guy who has looked like he doesn’t give a rat’s behind for the past 2-3 years.
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
7:24 pm
vava74,
Considering our budget/PT available, who would you like for the Hawks to sign?
In my opinion, we should not get our expectations too high for the next big man the Hawks (might) sign. All we want is 10-15 minutes of banging/rebound/hustle/post defense/energy.
kirkinga
July 15th, 2009
7:28 pm
Thanks Sekou, you are as gracious as ever.
I guess no one has an answer as to why the Hawks don’t have more minutes available for another big that can help them?
So is Wallace or Gooden going to be good with just playing 8-10 minutes ppg?
I just can’t shake this feeling that the 8-10 minute limitation only applied to Anderson.
In fact, if the Hawks should acquire another quality big man, I would wager that he will play more minutes. Coach Woodson would be negligent if he only used that player 8-10 game.
Anyone for frontline improvement via Randolph Morris and organic growth? Anyone?
Hello?
Go Hawks!!
Kappy
July 15th, 2009
7:30 pm
Everyone settle down on Andersen. If anything, this excites me to know Sund has to have another big man in mind to help. If not, why do this? Why now?
We’ll be fine everyone.
Rise Up!
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
7:35 pm
AJ, yeah. Hope Acie gets it together.
Blast
July 15th, 2009
7:37 pm
It ain’t the playoffs yet, is it? So how come Houston fans are talking smack on our blog. It’s only a trade in the off season, people! Hawks must be coming up in the world.
Hope Acie Law makes out well. If he doesn’t have confidence, then he can’t play pro ball.
Fire RandMo!
Hawks still need Flip.
And a big or two. I know Sund knows that.
Go Hawks, Go!
Kappy
July 15th, 2009
7:38 pm
kirkinga- I’m all for organic growth. There’s no way you could be a Hawks fan the last decade and not appreciate some player development. But what did you ever see out of Randolph that made you believe he’s worth developing. I’m not into attacking players usually, but I just never saw the guy give a damn. Every time he came in, it looked like he was spending too much time thinking about the play, as opposed to just throwing his body around and being active. At least Solo comes in and realizes that he has to play hard. I want another big man that wants to be active and is OK playing behind Al and Zaza for 5 or 10 minutes a night.
Frankly, the fact that we’re all contemplating the 3rd center on this team is a victory in and of itself. Times certainly have changed around here, and I love it.
Blast
July 15th, 2009
7:47 pm
As for this minutes thing for extra bigs. I can’t imagine anybody believe that. If they watched all the season games and saw the playoffs, they must remember Horford limping to the bench and Zaza having to play extended minutes and the only other bigs off the bench were Solo and RandMo? U trying to win a playoff series with Solo and RandMo? How come Boston has minutes for all the big men they have? Wave after wave of big men they consistently threw at the Hawks? Isn’t everybody here complaining that out starters play heavy minutes? They play heavy minutes because the guys that sub for them are not very good. Hawks need to cut all the dead weight players and invest their money and minutes on players that will actually contribute on the court, so your starters do not get worn down during the long seasons. Hell yeah, their are minutes to go around!
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
8:02 pm
There are 96 minutes to share between PF and center. Looking at a potential minutes breakdown:
Josh – 32 minutes
Al – 30 minutes
ZaZa – 20 minutes
backup PF – 14 minutes.
I hope we get another big man, and I hope Woody knows how to handle the minutes of his bench players. (And our bigs minutes should depend on matchups etc.). Obviously, with foul trouble and potential injuries, more minutes can be found for another big.
cp
July 15th, 2009
8:15 pm
I have never seen so much love for a second round pick who did not even start on his last team. If you have NBA TV they are showing the summer league games now. Law looks timid and scared out there. He might be on his way to becoming a journeyman if he doesn’t get his head into it.
Steve
July 15th, 2009
8:21 pm
Ben Wallace – reports are saying he may retire. Playing basically on 1 leg.
Drew Gooden, Chris Wilcox, Tim Thomas – are any of those guys better than Solomon and Morris? Myabe so, but I don’t know.
Jazz are trying to dump Boozer – Give’em Mo’ Evans, and a 1st pick next year, re-sign Flip and your set. If Marvin signs that is.
Steve
July 15th, 2009
8:26 pm
P.S. For the cap implications of Boozer’s contract, maybe the Jazz could throw in some cash.
As far as playing time, Booz’ needs less minutes – oft injured. Would really help the front court.
RaJaH
July 15th, 2009
8:29 pm
Another poster questioned why the league would deny us the injury exception after Jason Collier’s death yet approve Houston for Yao’s injury. Can anyone explain this?
Sautee
July 15th, 2009
8:33 pm
Ariose,
As far as Flip vs. Bibby I’ll say this. Flip gave a LOT more bang for the buck last year, but his career AST/TO ratio is like 2.3 / 1.63. Terrible.
By the way Bibby was 8th in the league at AST /TO ratio ahead of Nash, Billups and Parker.
Flip never should have gotten minutes at point guard. It robs him of his natural aggressiveness on offense.
AND, as I posted on Bradley’s blog last week:
It’s an underappreciated fact that when we got Bibby our turnovers went down by over 2 per game. And in a close game 2 turnovers can easily be the difference. That CERTAINLY wouldn’t have happened with Flip as PG.
I liked Flip as our “microwave”, but with Crawford here, I just don’t see it happening.
Hoops
July 15th, 2009
8:36 pm
When we sign Marvin and Teague, which will eventually happen, we will have 10 players under contract. West has a QO for 1M. If he accepts, then that’s 11 players for roughly 63M.
So, we have ~6M to sign 2 players (13 players is the league minumin.) and stay under the L. tax. I think these two players are very important to the success of the 2009-10 Hawks!
What players do we go after? Josh is the only PF that we have if we start Horford at C. Most of the time, Horford moves to PF when Josh goes to the bench and Zaza plays C. We have to have another quality player in case Josh or Horford are injured or in foul trouble. I say we get the best player at either position. If the new player is strickly a PF, then Horford would stay at C if Josh goes out. If he is a C, then Horford backs up at PF.
We have 6M. Go after the best BIG available. Who is that? Big Baby, Wilcox, Wallace, Hollins?
We can get Big Baby or Wilcox for 5M. If we can’t sign them after we try, then get Wallace or Hollins for less money. Then sign Solo for 1M right?
NO, NO, NO! GO FOR IT!!! Why wait??? LEE or Odum can be had! The Knicks or the Lakers don’t want to pay for either player! See what you can get them for. I know we will have to make a trade. We will not pass the Cavs, Celtics, or Magic if WE DON’T MAKE A MOVE THAT COUNTS!!! Can you imagine the Hawks with Lee in the line up? A 3 team trade can make it happen!!!
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
8:41 pm
http://www.peachtreehoops.com/2009/7/15/950470/a-brief-reprieve-on-mike-woodsons
Hmmm….
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
8:47 pm
Sautee: Kobe, Fisher, Shannon, Farmar, Vujacic
That’s five guards for two positons. So how did Phil Jackson give them All regular minutes? Boston Rotates at least five Front-Court players when healthy between the PF/C positons.
Bibby, Joe, Flip, Crawford, Teauge
So you’re saying it’s not possible to give these guys regular minutes, or are you saying that b/c we have woodson as our HC, it just won’t happen?
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
8:57 pm
Samuel,
id have to agree… we would be making a lil’ noise with the acquisition of one Lamar Odom… only if it were possible…
Nire,
no fan of the move but the closest NBA home to Ben Wallace “Home” is the Hawks…
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
9:05 pm
Further proof that the AJC should just turn the whole damned works over to Sekou. Here’s the headline for the story on Antoine Walker’s gambling difficulties as of 9pm:
Ex-Hawk Antoine Walker has $822,500 gambling debut
Um…debut? Could, perhaps, you mean DEBT? Because an $822,500 gambling debut would mean something quite different. I’d like to have a debut like that…
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
9:08 pm
the boy game is something ignorant or as i call it (ig-nant) its gonna be fuuuun to watch… ill take him over Flip any day…
Ariose this one for you… you can appreciate good quality youtube… i owe you one for that Smitty throwback…
he does Uncle Ray something dirty at 3:05
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyEuysbhirQ
Drewscrilla
July 15th, 2009
9:18 pm
I just hope the Hawks cotinue to improve and make a run at the finals sooner or later
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
9:28 pm
bigdave,
Wallace hasn’t lived in the South since he graduated high school, and his home and family are up in Ohio. If he wasn’t willing to play hard for the team that was both closest to his home and the team with the best NBA record, I don’t see why he’d play hard further from home for a less-hyped team.
Wabe
July 15th, 2009
9:32 pm
I’d rather get Powe over Big Baby.
I don’t think Big Baby would really fit for the Hawks. We need a bruiser, someone who can get in the paint and bang bodies. Honestly, I’m more accustomed to seeing Big Baby step 10-15 FT away from the basket and look for the jumper…
I don’t think Odom would ever consider moving from the world champion Lakers to a team that’s still a ways back when it comes to championships…
And I just don’t see the Hawks being the team that’s capable of snagging the best FA still available on the market…
Therefore, I think you guys should start spitting out some more names – DIFFERENT NAMES – AIM A BIT LOWER. Wish I were wrong, but I just don’t see Sund making that kind of splash…
Wabe
July 15th, 2009
9:35 pm
And Ariose, I’m 100% w/you on Flip bro.
As you so wisely put it in one of your earlier posts,
“Resign Flip dammit!”
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
9:42 pm
Niremental…
personally i dont know Ben Wallace, but obviously you do since you say “home for him has always been the Great Lakes…”; yea, the same place he left…for a worse team…for the “bread”. nor do i know who he wants to play or as you say, “play hard” for. i only commented to say that he was born and raised in the deep south, college in VA… where his family lives (or has moved to) none of my concern… i have no idea as to where he would or wouldnt make his final NBA home.. but hey, you’re the insider… to me, he doesnt have it anymore.. looks as if he lost a little weight/muscle too…
D From H-Town
July 15th, 2009
9:46 pm
I’m a Houston resident and Rox fan.
We’re obviously happy to get Andersen. In my opinion he fits, in some ways, the mold of a Brad Miller from the Adelman Kings, Good Passer, Shooter etc. Though Miller is still more physical and a better rebounder than it appears Andersen will be. But you guys certainly made out well for yourselves. Most importantly, you get a do-over on a draft pick (possibly protected) and $2M cash in this economy and falling cap limits.
I also wanted to say I really liked reading your comments. You guys do a good job asking good questions and interacting with each other.
You also did a good job not paying too much attention to that hater from Houston. I was happy to see you guys take Boston to 7 games a couple seasons ago and was glad to see you guys get to the 2nd round this past season. Your bigs really are something to see.
I don’t know how you guys feel about Bibby but I thought that was a great move to help you guys get some veteran leadership from a seasoned pro like Bibby. He’s never been much of a defender but he knows how to run a team. I was secretly hoping the Rockets might be able to get him because of his experience running an Adelman offense but that’s not how it went down.
Sautee
July 15th, 2009
9:48 pm
Ariose,
Answered it yourself. Woody is no Phil Jackson.
If Flip WERE to end up here, then we’d have a bunch of folks complaining about Teague’s minutes.
Skywalker
July 15th, 2009
9:49 pm
Pray tell . . . . . what does future considerations mean? Any guess on this one?
ATMAN
July 15th, 2009
9:50 pm
Hoops, well said. For the approx. 6 mil left to reach the luxury tax, I’d be OK with picking up Wilcox or Big Baby or Lee and in addition sign Siler (he’s playing solid in Summer League). We need size, rebounding, and defense in the middle.
Sautee
July 15th, 2009
9:52 pm
D From H-Town,
Thanks for showing up and being polite. You’re welcome back anytime.
Best of luck this year, except for two games. heh heh.
The Truth
July 15th, 2009
9:58 pm
In his defense, Randolph Morris has been the whipping boy too long without properly framing the situation appropriately. In all fairness, Morris epitomizes the ultimate “3 second” man perhaps through no fault of his own. The way in which he was acquired spelled his demised destiny. His resume suggested he never got honor status out of college into the NBA even though he came from an esteem basketball culture as Kentucky.
Morris was technically a free agent after putting his name in for the 2005 NBA Draft and not being drafted. He returned to the Wildcats after sitting out an NCAA-mandated 14-game suspension. A provision in the NBA’s collective bargaining agreement prevented Morris from re-entering the NBA draft and he was given free agent status throughout the 2006-07 seasons. He was acquired by the Knicks as a FA out of college making only 800K/per year and got lost in the rotation against better centers. Since the knock on Morris game was his lack of intensity and poor defense, these unfavorable traits hurt him as he was trying to break into the rotation especially with an uncelebrated past. So he comes to the Hawks seeking a fresh start but still carried the old baggage. Whatever you think about Morris, his faults perhaps can be corrected but only with the right coach whom he does not have. I would say that Woody may be the worst thing that could have happened to Morris trying to jump-start his career. As the 4th and last option, he rarely saw garbage time. If you are perceived to be unworthy even of garbage time, how can any player be motivated to play; especially in Morris case, who is already a genetically uninspired player? It seems that there is no action plans to address the Morris motivation mystery. Woody seems to be content to let him rot on the bench and hope he goes away. The problem with this strategy is when the injury bug hits; Woody tends to just throw him in expecting a miracle and subliminally blame him for any bad outcome.
I don’t expect this year to be any different than last. In fact this year maybe even worst for Morris since another “Big” add-on may make him the 5th option. Then he really will be the ultimate whipping boy.
O'Brien
July 15th, 2009
10:02 pm
Hoops,
With the ~$6 mil we have left, I would sign Drew Gooden, Jamal Magloire or Adonal Foyle, and Solomon Jones. That way, we have a good rotation, and a lot of fouls. Our front court is way too soft (except for ZaZa sometimes), so I hope we come with a nasty attitude, especially no dunks/layups. How many dunks/layups did we give up last year? Foul them clean and hard, and send them to the line.
Samuel
July 15th, 2009
10:22 pm
Bigdave,
I just hope our management doesn’t have the attitude that some around here have. You know that “we have no chance” so don’t even bother to try. According to reports he is negotiating with Dallas and Miami and they can offer him only 5.8 million. They are definately no closer to winning a ring than us and ATL is just as desirable a city as those two.
Again, I like Marvin Williams but he’s no Lamar Odom. But hey, what do I know.
Steve
July 15th, 2009
10:39 pm
Rasho Nesterovic is a 7-0 ft. 255 Free Agent from the Pacers – think he played with some good Spurs squads before that – maybe he should be in the mix also?
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
10:40 pm
Samuel…
agreed… i read the same thing, i think Portland is in the mix as well… he’s such a versatile player and is a team first guy. will do whatever is asked of him on the floor. defends, rebounds, scores in a variety of ways. im guilty of seeing great potential in Marvin game however. i dont know… if the Lakers lose him, i dont see a repeat… i tell you what, landing Odom would be a beast of a move… however, i am a realist. one of those that feel it has no chance of happening… dont know what it will take but i hope we at least give him a holla…
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
10:42 pm
*and is= and a
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:42 pm
Sautee, I hear ya lol. But if it’s late August and Flip doesn’t have a home. Sund would be foolish not to snatch him up. It’s always good to have insurance for injuries etc. Remeber the games Joe missed? Or how horrible Bibby was when he was sick? Maybe it was really Acie that had the problem and not Woodson. Maybe Teauge will be assertive and TAKE his minutes from the vets with his aggressive play. I think keeping flip gives us “contender-type” depth, but I understand and agree with your concerns.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:46 pm
Bigdave, Yes Craword is filthy with his, but he’s certainly not “more explosive” then flip like some ppl seem to be saying.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:46 pm
He’s just like Joe, a glorified and adequately hyped jump shooter. But Got to youtube and search for Jamal Crawfords Dunks. You’ll ONLY find one. ONE out of all his highlight on the internet.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:50 pm
Guys i’m trying to break a long post into smaller ones so AJC will accept it…..
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:52 pm
That confirms my concerns about him. Like Joe and Bibby, when he gets cold from the perimeter, it can get ugly. Pretty much everyone who’s familiar with his game has called him streaky.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:53 pm
On the flipside (pun-intended), if you search Flip on youtube, you get tons of facials and Gangster-thug like abuse to the rim and his helpless, unsuspecting victims. Which tells me (and you all know this) flip may miss a few jump shots, but he never really goes through “scoring-droughts” because of his ability to attack the rim and get to the foul-line. He’s just a good piece for us to have on our team. And he fit in great with the core; he helped minimized our scoring droughts which plagued us when Childress(no jump shot) was on the squad.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:53 pm
I actually don’t believe that making him a backup PG hinders his game. A lot of times when you pit him at the SG he gets a bit out of control, but when you put him at point he becomes more responsible and kind-of reels his aggressiveness in a bit and makes better decisions. I think that had a lot to do with his game growing and him maturing as a player (in DET that wouldn’t have been the case).
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:53 pm
Believe it or not, Woodson aided in Flips growth as well. He got into it a few time with flip because of his bad decision making at PG, but at the same time he afforded Flip with the playing time to learn from his mistakes and get better as a result of that because Flip is a Vet.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:54 pm
One can only hope Woody does the same for Teauge.
Doug
July 15th, 2009
10:54 pm
Yet again…why are some still clamoring for Flip….why….he is utterly redundant and unnecessary with the signing of Crawfors…he is not near the player that Jamal is…cannot function successfully as a point…hence his career 2.3-1.6 assis-to ratio..as opposed to Crawfors 4:5-2.0…The Lakers 5 guards do not have the mind numbing redundancy that having both Flip and Crawford would…they also have a Hall of Fame coach that knows how to use 5 players in two spots…Teague would get Acie-light time and everone would be calling him a bust in two years…SIGN A BIG
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
10:56 pm
ONE f$%^ING WORD CAN YOU BELIVE THAT? WOW.
I HAD TO CHANGE “S U S P I C I O N S” TO CONCERNS IN ORDER TO GET THE POST TO GOT THROUGH.
Doug
July 15th, 2009
11:00 pm
Crawford not as explosive as Flip??? Because Flip has more dunks on Youtube??? You could not find a single league GM or Coach who would buy into Flip being a “more explosive” player…and certaintly nowhere near as good a player as Jamal Crawford,,,,
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:02 pm
Doug, read my posts and you should undersand why flip is a good fit for this team. Unlike Bibby, Joe, and Jamal, Flip IS NOT A PURE JUMPSHOOTER. HE HAS A NOSE FOR THE RIM. HE ATTACKS AND GETS TO THE LINE. HE PUTS PRESSURE ON OPPOSING TEAMS BIG MEN. IT’S A COMPONENT THAT WAS LACKING FROM OUR BACKCOURT UNTIL HE CAME ALONG.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:05 pm
Doug, BS….
You must not be reading my posts thoroughly. I SAID that Jamal, Like Joe and Bibby, are JUMPSHOOTERS. When they go through their little annoying droughts, it really stalls this teams offense because our offense runs through or guards the madjority of the time. Flip nullifies their crappy/streaky shooting performances with his ability to get into the paint and put pressure on the opposing teams big men.
Doug
July 15th, 2009
11:11 pm
Ariose, BS : I read your posts entirely…I simply think they are…well, wrong. For the last 6 years of his career Jamal averages 4.6 FT attempts per game while Flip averages 2.2!!! His high was last season with the Hawks at 2.9…who is attacking the rim? How is Jamal getting fouled on all those jump shots?? Again…Flip is a poor mans Jamal which is why he has been paid and emplyed as such throughout his career…Not a bad player and he really did well for the hawks last year but Jamal is a huge upgrade and Teague needs to play…by the way he will add the penetrating dimension as well
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:12 pm
Doug, We can sign flip with the Bi-annual. That leaves the Full Mid Leve Exception for us to grab some bigs and maybe Gerald Green for 800k!!!
Doug
July 15th, 2009
11:15 pm
Ariose. Bs: I read your entire post…just think it is wrong. For his last six seasons Jamal averages 4.6 FT attempts per game while Flip averages 2.1…Flips HIGH was 2.9 last season with the Hawks…who is explosive and attacking the rim?? Are NBA players that stupid that they are fouling a “jump shooter” that much? Again…Flip is a poor mans Jamal…did a nice job for the Hawks but will again be paid like and emplyed as a lesser jamal…Teague will also add a penetrating dimension
Doug
July 15th, 2009
11:16 pm
Sorry for the double post
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
11:17 pm
id agree.. not as explosive… though im a fan of the famous, “Flip Murry!!!” call from Mike Tirico when he placed his male anatomy in the face of Kirk Hinrich as he elevated to the rim, there is no need for youtube to confirm the explosiveness argument. however, Mal is quite crafty given his length. Joe has scorer ability but yes he is a true shooter… i just think when u combine Teague (low key explosive) and Mal they out weigh Flip… yes it can get ugly when we are cold.. however, i doubt all 3 above avg shooters will be… thats why i like Mal over Flip… Flip was an avg shooter at best and while he was at times the lone attacker, he lacked play making ability… in Mal’ we get a above avg shooter, with play making prowess…
not to mention… the young fella….!!! “UNLEASH THE FLUTES ON EM’ GURU!!!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1CR5EapjR0
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:21 pm
Doug, I agree with you asupmtion of flip. I was just saying that he added a slightly different dimesion than Bibby, Joe, and Crawford do.
Maybe you are right, but we still don’t know if Jamal will fit in. What if he doesn’t and the expirement is a failure? I’m just saying it sure would be nice to have flip sitting on the bench at that point.
I undrstand that our coach is cousing all of us fans/managemnt alike to rehink the players that we add to this roster. Bit I say why? It’s Rick Sunds job to feild the best/talented team he possibly can. Does not re-signing flip aid that theory? I don’t think so.
Woodson ONLY has one year left on his deal. If he can’t figure out how to manage the minutes of many talented player like the rest of the hed coaches in this leauge, then he should be looking for a new job next summer(but that’s unlikely to happen with the ASG I KNOW).
I understand where you all a rationally coming from. But from a competitive tsandpoint, I personally can’t except the fact that our Genral Manager has to scale down the talent on our roster because Mike Woodson doesn’t know how to manage minutes properly after over 30 years in the NBA.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:22 pm
*I understand where you ALL are rationaly coming from.
G-Man
July 15th, 2009
11:22 pm
Even after all our improvement, we still don’t get enough credit.
who are the top 8 teams in the east in order???
Thomas Beer:
Without putting any real thought into it:
Washington (corrected)
1) Boston
2) Orlando
3) Cleveland
4) Miami
5) Chicago
6) Philly
7) Toronto
Damn – I left Atlanta out? The East 1 thru 9 is going to be a lot tougher than it has been in recent years…
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:28 pm
bigdave, Nice find!!!!
I agree, You guys may be right. I’m probably just worrying too much. We’ll probably be OK with Bibb, Joe, Teague, an Crawford.
I just want whats best for the squad.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
11:29 pm
Aroise,
Look at the question (and answers) Micah Hart ask on his twitter page today:
Trivia question I need an answer to – how many current NBA players have scored 50+ points in a game more than once?
Thanks to all for your trivia guesses – the answer is 12 – Shaq, T-Mac, Kobe, DWade, LBJ, Arenas, AI, Crawford, VC, Jamison, Dirk, and Redd.
Crawford is one of only 8 current NBA players with 3 or more career 50+ point outbursts. Kinda impressive, no?
Doug
July 15th, 2009
11:29 pm
Ariose, I agree with not scaling down our talent level just because Woody is the Coach… However it is reality and we all know that if Flip were signed Teague would simply not play…not develop…and 2 years from now we will all be wondering where on this planet we will get Bibby’s replacement from. I just really think it is imperative to get a quality physical…defense oriented big and let the fifthe guard be a Mario or Thomas Gardner type…oh well good discussion anyway
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
11:30 pm
G-Man
that 1-8 list alone is why i guarantee at least 70-80% (including myself, and hopefully Sekou) of this blog contributors have no idea who Thomas Beer is… and now i have no reason to…
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:30 pm
Melvin, yeah it is. I saw that. I’m not knocking crawford. I was just saying i’d rather have flip on the squad as wwell. But who knows, we may be better off without him.
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
11:31 pm
Heck, in the great Joe Johnson hadn’t score 50pts in a game. We may need to re-evaluate who should be the 1st option on offense…lol
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
11:33 pm
Ariose…
thank you sir… however, id be hard pressed to top your Classic Smitty…
and as far as whats best for the team… Amen.. but hey.. we’re a 1on1 offense and we signed on hell of a 1on1 player… Melvin’s 50pt stat says it all…
Melvin
July 15th, 2009
11:34 pm
Ariose,
Just give him a chance. Let Anakin Joe eat the Crawford crow by himself.
Anakin Joe,
Did you notice half of Crawford highlights (in bigdave link) were passes? May the guy has meet a shot he didn’t like…lol
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
11:35 pm
*on=one
after a while ill stop correcting in areas where you guys can obviously interpret intent.. however, have to stay somewhat sharp for the grammar critics out there…
niremetal
July 15th, 2009
11:37 pm
I’d rather have a guy who provides a relatively consistent 16-26 points rather than a guy who is as streaky as Crawford. It’s not for nothing that all the teams where he’s been the #1 offensive option have been 20-30 win squads.
Having him as the #2 or #3 option for the Hawks (and #1 off the bench) seems like the perfect role for him. As I said, he can be SuperFlip – come off the bench and do whatever is needed of him, which often will be “shoot with no conscience.”
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:39 pm
Damn my spelling gets sloppy when I rush lol. Guess that means it’s a good discussion lol.
I really hope Teauge can pick up where Flip left off. That would be great….well actually with crawford here, he’ll be asked to do more facilitating.
bigdave, can’t dissagree with you there lol.
Doug, That’s true. Mario has been very good for us. Flip should find a home because he had such a great season for us. I wish him the best wherever he lands next(except when he plays us of course hah.) He’s been a journeymen for so long and he’s a great guy, I really hope he finds a long-term deal with a team that’s a good fit for him.
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
11:43 pm
i cant wait til we see both Joe and Mal on the floor together… 2 big guards who appear to have the ball on a yo-yo… it defines task keeping each in front… should be very hard for the opposing defense to keep balance…
doc
July 15th, 2009
11:46 pm
well id take odum for 7.5 for four years. funny his mubers werent too much better if at all last year than marvin’s and the guy pulled down 14 mil. seems he doesnt think maybe he was overpaid last year for what was needed or gotten out of him. i imagine he doesnt want to be eniough of the ulitmate team playert to take less riches fro the team and that might have been a sticking point to his negotiations with the lakers. he was a 13/ 8 uguy last year after folding dearly in the finals the year beofre. no organic growth there, then again if he is a bargain find othewise stick to the plan my bot sund. dont let anyone deter you on your rounds this year.
kirk you got posterized by sekou and you call it gracious? better watch out or ariose will make a you tube out of that one. heh heh
kirk man you think really well and are the mr positive on the braves and hawks site. what happened this summer? did your brain get hijacked by aj, clyde and ra? did they take your soul with it?
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:48 pm
Melvin, heh! Yeah AJ cant take all the blame by himself while a watch and whistle like a said nothing hehehe…. SOUNDS GOOD TO ME!!!!!!
Ken Strickland
July 15th, 2009
11:48 pm
Since it’s a certainty Anderson wasn’t going to do anything as a Hawk, why are some of you worried about what he mignt do with another team?
When you consider how little Ben Wallace did for Chicago and Cleveland, why would any of you think he’d be able to do more for the Hawks?
Orlando will return only 2(RLewis & DHoward) of the top 6 players that took them to the NBA finals. They’re going to start the season having to deal with some serious adjustment and chemistry issues.
I don’t understand how some of you can consistently claim AHorford isn’t a true center, then suggest we sign or trade for Bigs like CWilcox, DGooden, BWallace, BBass, CBosh, AStaudemire etc. Since when did any of these guys become true centers?
HawkKingBibby
July 15th, 2009
11:49 pm
Ben Wallace is completly WASHED UP and WORTHLESS. I would go with Skinner, Wilcox and even Diogu long before I called up Ben Wallace.
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:49 pm
Nire, I sure hope so dammit
bigdave
July 15th, 2009
11:52 pm
if Al Horford aint’ a center he sure plays like one…
Ariose
July 15th, 2009
11:54 pm
LOL@ Doc
Samuel
July 15th, 2009
11:54 pm
Doc,
Are you serious? You would “just as soon” have Marvin as Odom?
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:01 am
Ken, we’ve all come to the realization that getting a quality center is probably not oing to happen this summer. I’d be happy with a PF that has a long wingspan for rebounding pourposes, but with Channing frye and Rasheed all being signed already, that looks like it won’t happen.
So now all we’ve got left on the table are average/undersized hustle PF’s like Big Baby, Gooden, and Wilcox. Gotta get depth in the frontcourt on way or another lol.
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:02 am
*one
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:03 am
*Going
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
12:04 am
Isn’t Marvin a FA. I can’t tell. Looks like we is about as “sought after” as his running mate Chills.
Marvin Williams or L Odom.HUUUUMMMMM!!
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:14 am
Samuel,
Come on now. The reason no one’s going after Marvin is that they know the Hawks will match. Same reason no one is going after Felton in Charlotte, despite the fact that PGs are a precious commodity. Same reason there’s been no movement yet on David Lee or Nate Robinson or Kleiza or Sessions. The only RFAs who were heavily sought after came from teams that no one thought would match offers for them (Gortat from Orlando and Millsap from Utah).
I’d take Odom over Marvin today. But 3 years from now, I think my answer would be different. And since Odom will want a 4-year deal…
Anyway, it’s all academic. I can’t imagine Odom will settle for the mid-level. And that’s all we can offer him. Game, set, match.
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
12:15 am
Sniper Update:
http://www.nba.com/summerleague2009/games/boxscore.jsp?gameId=1520900026
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:18 am
Samuel, Salims making me look like an idiot over here lol. Acie has us all looking like fools….
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:19 am
And Anakin is on my permanent $hit list. If he hadn’t waffled on his afro sheen offer, we wouldn’t have lost Chills.
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
12:21 am
Three years from now we could all be dead. Three years from now Marvin may be walking like he’s 80 instead walking like he’s 60(like he is now).
Can’t we renounce him and sign Odom for more?
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:22 am
Ariose,
You notice that Patty Mills is getting DNPs all the time too? I think you need to start reevaluating which undersized guards you promote
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
12:23 am
All of Yall.
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:25 am
Hahahahaha!!!!
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:26 am
Samuel,
Nope. We’re over the cap once all the cap holds for roster spots, exceptions, etc are factored in. Renouncing Marvin does nothing.
And even if it did, no way in hell that Sund is stupid enough to renounce Marvin and let him walk for nothing.
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:27 am
Nire, Patty mills broke his foot last week. He just had surgery on it. He should be back b4 the season starts houh….so they say.
I’ll take full responsibility for Patty Mills’ awsomeness when he’s healthy hehehehe
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
12:27 am
Nire,
Mills has a broken foot. What’s Salim’s excuse other than the fact that:
“HE’S A SCRUBB”.
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:27 am
*though
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:31 am
Ah, didn’t catch the injury/surgery bit. I must admit that I don’t exactly follow the summer league even when I’m not studying for the bar…
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:31 am
Although on a related note, our old whippin boys (Gardner and Hunter) aren’t exactly tearing it up either. Gardner is 2-16 shooting so far. Yikes…
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:43 am
I hear ya nire, I just hear because I was keeping tabs on Mills…NOT summerleauge lol.
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:44 am
Oooh, Didn’t know those two were in sumerleauge, I shoulda figured.
OZINATL
July 16th, 2009
12:45 am
tough break for Mills, I think if given the chance he’ll be a solid player in the league.
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
12:48 am
Cut that out, OZINATL – you’ll get Ariose’s hopes up
cp
July 16th, 2009
12:49 am
Odom wants a 5 year deal for around 9 or 10 million a year…I was hoping we would bring Hunter back but maybe not.
Ariose
July 16th, 2009
12:54 am
ROFL nire1 We’ll see heh! I got a good feeling about him though
OZINATL
July 16th, 2009
12:55 am
i still couldn’t believe the dude fell to 55 in the draft. Dunno why, he had a solid, if not spectacular 2 years in college, maybe it was breaking his hand and his size or the fact he is seen as more a undersized combo guard.
He would be nice in a Hawks uniform running that fast paced second unit.
Najeh Davenpoop
July 16th, 2009
12:57 am
I know it’s only summer league, but it’s nice to see my boy Brandon Jennings putting up solid assist and steal numbers so far. Every year it seems like there’s some player the media tries to hate (in ‘04 it was Josh Smith) and Jennings has actually been that guy ever since he skipped college to go to Europe. I hope he succeeds.
OZINATL
July 16th, 2009
1:44 am
what is impressing me about Jennings play is his assists. Usually summer league is about putting up points, but if he is to do well for Bucks he has to dish the ball. I know Bucks have taken a lot of stick for picking him. Hope he does well also.
blue hawk
July 16th, 2009
4:13 am
can we change the coach already?
man, i’m sure the hawks will be better with a better coach.
kirkinga
July 16th, 2009
4:39 am
doc, I’m still the same guy. There’s not a darn thing wrong with my brain. It’s just that I have no problems asking questions, even when the powers to be would rather you shut up and take what they give you. I may have been “Camp Director” last offseason, but it wasn’t forCamp Okey-Doke!
Still haven’t seen anyone really think through the notion that if the Hawks only have 8-10 minutes available for a quality big, then there’s a problem. Lots of talk around it, lots of talk about a guy player who supposedly didn’t want to be a Hawk, but not much to what is going to affect wins and losses.
For the record,I had no attachment to Anderson whatsoever, but that doesn’t mean I have to buy into some of the arguments and statements made about his sale to the Rockets.
It really all comes down to the team doc, every move should be scrutinized. We should ask “how does this move help us on the floor’? And if the answer is that it doesn’t, or that it is some kind of bookeeping move where the team is just”clearing assets”, then I think we fans have every right to ask what the hell are they doing. That is what I did with the decision to not extend, or fire Coach Woodson, and that is what I’m doing with this b.s. All the other moves, I love, I just don’t think they are enough as of yet.
We want a better product on the floor do we not? We want to become an elite team, or at least one that competes for a high playoff position each season, right? Well we need to be deep along the frontline as we are in the backcourt. That’s all I’m pointing out.
I’m the same me, recognizing the positive and the negative, calling b.s. when I see, just like most everyone else here.
(As for the Braves blog, well yeah, definitely more negative there. We’ve got a manager overusing his bulllpen, and it has cost us the lead in the division. And to top it off, they are talking about trading a young SS that is clutch and cheap for the next few seasons, because he is “demonstrative”. Someone has to speak up and point out that cultural differences shouldn’t be the basis for trading players.)
Go Hawks!!
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:14 am
Good morning Hawks fans,
Seems like things have gotten a little slow here.
I hope that we can get some conversation going this am.
mountain_jim
July 16th, 2009
8:18 am
Well Sekou you sure expressed no interest in answering and no value in my question concerning the trade details which still have not been reported – I realize it’s only a 2nd rounder but still, knowing what year, what protection, and what the future considerations were for the deal seem like reasonable questions to ask a beat reporter without being called a conspiracy nut or something similar for wondering why they don’t announce these details (2nd or not). Whatever.
mountain_jim
July 16th, 2009
8:24 am
Well Daniell will that help? (Get the conversation going)
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:29 am
mountain_jim-
I am having to go back and read what Sekou said to you.
wordsmithtom
July 16th, 2009
8:32 am
The Truth:
Spot on about Randy Mo. How could he get any minutes with Woodson fighting for his job? The question for me, is he better used as a practice player getting to bang with our young guys, or going to the developmental league? I’d suggest since he’s under contract, let him hang around Hawksville through the first month of the season and see if he gets some burn. If he’s just going to ride the pine thereafter, he’d be better off, IMHO, playing semipro on an everyday basis.
He’s a wellspoken, intelligent young man who believed the hype that he was ready for the NBA when he wasn’t. He needs burn, but couldn’t get it in NY and now can’t get it in Atlanta. If the Hawks can blow out a few teams in the first month, perhaps he can get some minutes of garbabe time here to keep him interested in practice. But, I’d consider him better used as an every day player in the developmental league. I can understand coach’s decision not to play him. I can’t understand the GM’s thinking not to use the developmental opportunity, unless they’ve given up on him already. At 6-11, 275…why give up on him so soon without giving him any work? Giving up on a 23 year old kid who does not show drug and alcohol issues and is obviously intelligent seems a bad idea. IMHO
Yes, he could be another Kwame Brown, but he also could blossom. He’s obviously smart enough; can he develop confidence with experience? We don’t know. I say play him. Here, or in developmental league…..
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:38 am
wordsmith-
I don’t have anything personal against Randolph Morris. Probably a nice guy. But, that guy is one of the worst basketball players I have EVER seen. He has NO upside. He is still living off his high school rep from 7 years ago. I would literally rather have a turnip on the bench than Morris. I don’t know how he could even be valuable as a practice player, when you can hire a tackling dummy to do his job. This is not AAU ball from 2002, this is the NBA in 2009 and the guy is not a player. If he were making 2 dollars from the Hawks then he is still stealing money.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:40 am
mountain_jim- Sekou does come across as a little defensive. I think that he and Bradley are having a beef. I have no evidence to back that up, but I think it is a nice conspiracy theory to get going.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:41 am
If Randolph Morris were to become Kwame Brown that would be a significant upgrade for him.
doc
July 16th, 2009
8:42 am
kirk good to know you still are you.
got to remember that some things dont change. yup still dealing with the basg, they are still going to be very dollar conscious and anderson would have been a unused piece on woody’s bench and an expensive one at that. yup dont forget still dealing with that too. i liked anderson for the hawks last year and he would have been a nice and less expensive piece to bring in once chills flew the coup and would have been the extra depth to have maybe taken some of the pressure of the long season off some of the other guys so they didnt go into fade at the end. he would have been a better choice than mo at times maybe to slide him in and smoove down to three and horford to four at time and provide some offense in a different way or a balance to zaza coming in to provide some outside and counter offense to what zaza likes to do. in the end it would have stretched woody beyond his comfort zone and we cant do that.
yeah cant really argue the points too much and see it all bro but remember the present actors in the play. right now the difference is they are winners and on a roll so they have done it pretty well and to get into much nit picking right now is premature. to me they seem to at least have a game plan and if that 2 mil allows them to feel comfortable in giving a little more money to a big like wilcox or his facsimile then cool or if it allows them a comfort zone in a project like siler then they can feel like they have stolen something from the rockets, which they wouldnt, say for a piece they would have never used. problem is they will not come out and present either scenario like that and we will never know the deeper ramifications of the anderson deal and what it freed up untip it is all over which i hope it isnt. the next card could be the best. so from that perspective based on what they do from here i am cool with it unless they put their folded hands on front of them and do nothing except hold onto the money.
thanks for taking the comments as a grain of sand, just kidding with you as you by now know. cant offer much argument on the bravos. stupid to have not kept tex at any price as he was a cornerstone and stupidly give chipper the bank for three more years as a non cornerstone. tex still had it all in front of him chipper doesnt. if thy werent thinking in those terms when they made the deal then both john s and bobby were losing some of their savvy which as you point out bobby has lost as field general. cant get the team playing better ball or spirited ball and manufacturing runs. good pitching though but that is all that is fun to watch and few people can really enjoy that as i do.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:43 am
I don’t use drugs or drink alcohol either, but I have no business being on the Hawks roster. I am pretty intelligent and well spoken, too. Still couldn’t get on the court in the NBA, except to play some promotion.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
8:47 am
doc- I agree with you on the Anderson deal. Either Sekou is right, which is to say that they made the best deal they could for an assest that wasn’t going to be used, and will turn that into something. Or Bradley is right and this is a sign that the ASG are making monetarily based decisions and we are done dealing. I guess we won’t know, until we know. I am certainly hoping Sekou is right.
ILL-logical
July 16th, 2009
9:01 am
How about they are both right: the BASG has financial issues and the Anderson deal ,like the Acie/Speedie deal got them some motion without a lot of heat, financially speaking.
There are no plans for a championship run in 2009-10. however, pending the outcome of the litigation and the resolution of some related issues, there will be a solid season ahead with a propbable third consecutive playoff appearence. Could that have even been considered possible a couple of years ago; for any Atlanta pro franchise?
dap01
July 16th, 2009
9:09 am
Sekou: Have you ever heard of any plans that the coaching staff has to develop RandMo? He has size, he is young, he can shoot. Surely that is enough of a framework to work with.
Have you heard….”we are going to get him in the weight room, build him up and slowly work him into the rotation” or “he is working on his post moves this summer” or “once he can do ____ he will be able to contribute”.
That is what I would like to hear about our young players. What are the plans for development?
The same question should be asked about Al Horford, What is he working on this summer?
Hawk n the Ham
July 16th, 2009
9:11 am
*Knock*Knock*
Lamar Odom??
*Knock*
Baby Davis??
Anyone there? Want to come to ATL???
PLEASE?????
wordsmithtom
July 16th, 2009
9:24 am
Daniel, how do you know Randy is a such a bad player? Nobody’s seen him play. He’s gotten no burn. A minute here; two there….that’s not enough time to get your jock adjusted.
He may be worthless…I don’t know. But, if he was good enough to get Kentucky’s attention four years ago, at 23….I’m inclined to think he has upside. Let’s find out by giving him some minutes; preferably in the Developmental League. Let’s SEE whether he can show REAL potential, that’s all.
If he were a loser, I’d say ex him now. But I know big men take longer to develop and he’s only 23….and he is BIG.
Steve
July 16th, 2009
9:37 am
Anybody know what the hold up with Marvin is? The difference between $37.5 and 40m. seem pretty minute when talking about the NBA. Really want to see him in a Hawks uniform.
atlsouthside
July 16th, 2009
9:42 am
HAWKS need to package a dead that brings Boozer to Atlanta…. ASAP!!!
I’d give up Marv Williams & somebody else…
atlsouthside
July 16th, 2009
9:44 am
Odom would be a good addition as well…. We just need a tall dude who is athletic enough to run the floor, he doesnt necessarily have to be a scorer…. A “stud” like Boozer is ideal tho… averaging 20pts and 10 rebs
Anakin Joe
July 16th, 2009
9:49 am
nire, if I had paid for Chill’s hair care products for a year, I would have lost my internet service. So I figured y’all would rather have my daily posts than the ‘fro owning the baseline and crashing the boards. I was correct wasn’t I? Hello? Is this thing on? Tap-tap-tap. Dammit!
IMO, a head coach should not have to motivate a guy who went undrafted, couldn’t find playing time for the bottom-feeding Knicks and was fortunate enough to land potentially his last 2-year contract. That player should be knocking guys out (like Esteban) or be a menace (like Mario) in practice. Y’all need to stop blaming Woody for every player who has poor work ethic. Each and every one of us have worked or gone to school with someone who lacks work ethic and personal accountability. Did you blame your boss for not getting that person to change the fabric of their being? Of course not. This is the NBA not Upward Basketball.
Melvin, I think Crawford will be a lot like Harrington was for us. He will score his points, win a few games, disappoint in more games and when he leaves, no one will remember much about his tenure as a Hawk. They were traded for each other (Crawford & Harrington) and I think we will get that same type of player. I just don’t like the notion of putting $10M in a SuperFlip and $6M in Zaza & TBD-big man. I think that is a poor allocation of the budget.
I MUS WRITE
July 16th, 2009
9:51 am
Dam Terrel calm down homie -No body said Austin Daye was gonna be like Mike or be the next Magic Johnson….Jeezuz -I said he would be a bigger possibly better version of tayshaun prince…..
The guy is 6′11 with crazy wingspan and shoots the rock really well from the outside…….. Who gets caught up in summer league-u must spaek for yourself
Dam man-Acie Law was the RMR MVP last year and look at him now,looking like a bag of crap this year- I know hoops my man -so I dont put alot into undrafted players and rookies….70% of those guys wont make an NBA roster so whats there to be excited about.
There goes Terell just spouting off about nothing again……….
HELL NO TO BIG BEN
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
10:08 am
wordsmithtom- It only takes a couple of minutes to see the dude doesn’t know a** from his elbow. And Kentucky wasn’t too disappointed to see him go. Dude is not a baller.
doc
July 16th, 2009
10:11 am
kirk, one more thing, very gracious as usual in your response. might i also add it seems ahem,…. that you might have ramped up your expectations a bit more. seems winning got in your head a bit.
as a season ticket holder for the second year, last year was a blast and i hope it continues. so, if your words have an impact on that, i am all for them. seems i was sitting where you were last year calling the bs. I AM glad to sit back and watch someone else do it for a change. so i drink to you, rod, anakin, a dear friend from the olden dAys of the blog, clyde to whom i have nothing but respect even if that means i appreciate his trips to rio vicariously and RA.
i mean without regualr contributions from ando someone has to fill that huge void.
Ken Strickland
July 16th, 2009
10:12 am
Why is it sooooo hard for some of you to realize the WOODY FACTOR is a real consideration when it comes to signing FA Bigs, or even drafting for that matter.
(1) Why waste money the SAASG either doesn’t have or doesn’t want to spend to sign Flip Murray? He would do no more than duplicate what we’ll get out of Crawford and Teague. You have to be absolutely blind not to realize, at this point, that Woodson can’t or won’t consistently play more than 8 players. He prefers to use 1 center(Zaza), 1 guard(Flip) and 1 forward(Evans). Resigning Flip, and continuing that pattern, would make the deal and money paid to Crawford a waste, along with using our #1 pick on Teague.
(2) NBA FA’s are obviously more intelligent than a lot of Hawk fans. They realize that coming to the Hawks as the #2 backup center under Woodson, could land them in the blackhole created by his inability or unwillingness to manage the mins of more than 8 players. That’s magnified even further when you’re being offered a lowball salary.
Someone mentioned that a 2nd rd pick in the NBA has little value. Well, that’s not the opinion of the more successful franchises, since they pick so low in the 1st and 2nd rds. Since we’ll probably fininh no lower than 3rd or 4th in our division next yr, we’ll end up with another low 1rd pick. We can package that 2nd rd pick, along with our 1st rounder, to move up in the draft, or acquire a quality player in a trade. Don’t discount the value of a 2nd rd pick just because you don’t like a particular deal.
Does anyone else feel we would be in better shape if BK hadn’t been forced out? Consider this:
(1) He obviously valued Chills’ talents and contributions far more than Sund. I have no doubt he wouldn’t signed him to an extension before the Greek offer would have come into play.
(2) I also believe the same would have been done with Smoove.
(3) We still might have signed Flip, but with Chills signed to a long term contract, Evans wouldn’t have been brought on board.
(3) If BK was still our GM, Woodson would be gone and we’d currently have 8 or our top 9 players, AHorford, JSmith, MWilliams, MBibby, JJohnson, ZPachulia, ALaw and JChildress under contract. I DON’T KNOW ABOUT THE REST OF YOU HAWK FANS, BUT I LIKE THIS SITUATION BETTER THAN OUR CURRENT ONE, AND I DEFINITELY LIKE THIS TEAM BETTER THAN THE ONE WE’LL HAVE STARTING THE 09 SEASON. WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK?
Ben
July 16th, 2009
10:24 am
From Twitter Suns Jared Dudley @InsideHoops im hearing matt barnes could sign with either cleveland or atl. dont want to see him go.. but those teams he will make better
9:58 PM Jul 14th from web in reply to InsideHoops
Looks like we have interest in Matt Barnes. We need a big, but he is decent. I hope we sign a couple of players, bigs, to 1 year deals, so we have some money to pay for Joe and Marvin next year!
mountain_jim
July 16th, 2009
10:26 am
Hey Ken, I don’t discount the value of that 2nd round pick – but apparently Sekou does. Which is why I wondered whether the pick is even for next year (not disclosed in announcement), or if the undisclosed (but rumoured by Houston folks) protection is why the year is uncertain:
Sekou Smith
July 15th, 2009
5:48 pm
“It’s a second round pick Jim, who cares? Seriously. David Andersen was drafted in 2002 and is just now on the cusp of coming to the NBA. It’s just the way business is done sometimes in the NBA. This is not some covert operation. I’m stunned by all the conspiracy theories. It’s craziness.
Free agency brings out the kook in us all, I guess.”
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
10:34 am
Speaking of Ando,
“In all seriousness”, how are you dude and how is the little princess?
Anakin Joe
July 16th, 2009
10:40 am
Ben, I have a feeling that the Matt Barnes rumor is a contingency if things don’t go well with Marvin. It is more likely a negotiating ploy more than a realistic interest. As currently constructed, there is no room for barnes with Evans and Marvin on the squad. But if one of those guys isn’t here, then Barnes is pretty much the only “affordable” wing player out there who can provide quality minutes on offense AND defense.
niremetal
July 16th, 2009
10:47 am
Kirk,
You still don’t get it. Andersen is 29. He doesn’t have much time left before he’s on the downslide of his career. He wasn’t going to come to the NBA unless he could be darned sure he’d be a rotation player, because the odds are that in 3-4 years, he won’t be able to be a rotation player anywhere. On the Hawks, he’d probably have gotten 10-15 minutes a game because we have three players (Horford, Zaza, Josh) that play in front of him at C and PF Before we re-signed Zaza, my guess is that he was interested in coming here. But after that, I can’t imagine that he was.
There are a lot of free agent PF/Cs who will be satisfied with 10-15 minutes a game. Andersen would not be. He was not going to give up being the starting center for one of the 2-3 best teams in Europe to be the 2nd big man off anyone’s bench. It’s not that he wasn’t interested in being a Hawk. It’s that he was not interested in the role the Hawks had to offer him. Which is exactly what Sekou said and exactly what common sense should tell you.
I’ll eat my words if the Hawks fail to sign a decent PF or C on the free agent market by the end of the summer. But assuming they do, the Hawks will have a decent 4th big man not named David Andersen, $2 mil more in the bank (which again is important since operating revenues are likely to drop this year), and a second round pick; whereas before, they only would have had a decent 4th big man not named David Andersen.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
10:49 am
Ken- No way, would we be better off with BK as GM. We would not have resigned Bibby or Za to reasonable contracts. We would have not gotten Evans or Flip last year. I agree it is likely that Childress would be here and Woody would be gone, but I am not sure that is a bad thing.
Now why do you think Woody wouldn’t play his bench more? He plays the guys on his bench that can contribute. Solo got decent minutes last year and even Rio got a couple of min. here and there. Those are your 11/12 guys. Remember Speedy was hurt and so was Acie most of the season. Randolph Morris is complete garbage. So who else should have gotten more minutes last year that didn’t?
OzinATL
July 16th, 2009
10:49 am
Ken,
I hear you on the Woody factor, I’d rather see Woody out of ATL and get a real NBA head coach, someone who can teach, motivate and have a play book bigger than ISO’s. You can argue we have made the playoffs 2 years in a row under Woody so he must be doing something right, but, most of us know it had nothing to do with Woody. It was player talent alone that gut us this far and will get us as far as we will travel whilst Woody is our guide.
Hope this is his last year and we can move on an attain a higher calibre head coach, who WILL attract higher calibre free agents.
As for BK, for me, both Woody and BK were poison and it was really a matter of which one to go first. IF BK was around, we would have had Andersen in a Hawks uniform with a year NBA experience under his belt, both Josh’s would be locked up I agree and Woody would be gone, so there are positives. But really, I think Sund has more NBA smarts to lead us in the right direction than BK ever could.
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
10:51 am
Ken,
I don’t really see your point about this “Woody Factor”. Basically your list is about the same as we have now except for Marvin and Chills. I believe Marvin will be signed and Chills is where he chose to be. We also have Crawford in place of Acie(nuff said).
If BK were still here we probably would have canned Woody and hired some commentator or video man who you guys usually push for. More than likely we would have been struggling for a playoff spot. Definately would not have finished at or above where we did.
So no, your argument continues to be “LAME AS HELL” and purely based on opinion and emotion. You hate Woody, We get it.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
10:51 am
Also, the “WOODY FACTOR” came into play with resigning Bibby and Za at VERY reasonable contracts, because they like to play for him. Got to take the good and bad.
OzinATL
July 16th, 2009
10:53 am
Matt Barnes is decent, but no way an upgrade on Marvin.
Pay Marvin the money, back load it if we need, and let’s move on with filling out the rest of the roster. Let the #2 overall pick develop, rather than allowing someone else to benefit.
OzinATL
July 16th, 2009
10:57 am
Hey Daniel, Woody has to trust his bench more, otherwise the likes of JJ, Bibby, Al will be dead come playoff time, again. And then, you ask, what is the point of that?
If you don’t trust your bench and allow them to gain confidence and experience, how else do you expect them to help, you are better of with signing card board cut outs and have this sit on the bench.
Bottom line is, it’s on Woody.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
11:17 am
Hey Oz,
which players did you want to see get more minutes last year?
Samuel
July 16th, 2009
11:17 am
Sign Marvin but don’t overpay for him. Matt Barnes can give you basically what Marvin can. These cats need to know that there are other “fish in the sea” and the gravy train is drying up to an extent. They want to pout about one or two million when the majority of the world is suffering. Let their as_ “get to steppin”.
Daniel
July 16th, 2009
11:21 am
Oz- I do agree with you on Marvin. I don’t think we need to backload 4-5 years at 7-8 mil. per is very reasonable for both sides. The concern is obviously Marvin’s back, but you are right that we can’t let the #2 pick not maintain value. He will be more valuable, even as a trade piece, with a long term contact at reasonable numbers, or he stays healthy and continues to blossom as a player. Either way it is a win for the Hawks. The only real gamble is that the back reflares and he needs surgery, then you are locked into him. I think we don’t have a choice but to gamble on Marvin staying healthy.
Sautee
July 16th, 2009
11:43 am
I like Barnes over Mo as Marvin’s backup. Don’t know how we’d do that, though.
MannyT
July 16th, 2009
11:48 am
new blog up
vava74
July 16th, 2009
12:16 pm
Ken,
You are trading a “what if” for a tangible reality which is FAR BETTER than what we have experience on the recent past (with teams filled with loaded by questionable talents much alike some which have been thrown around as possible signings by the bloggers around – JR Rider, Glenn Robinson, … spring to mind)
I am very critical of Woody myself but we also need to look at what was accomplished: we went from bottom dwellers to two consecutive playoff berths.
I know that this year’s second round showing was very poor, however, we were crippled by injuries and Lebron was getting all the calls going his way:
JJ was wobbled from the start (tired and tender ankle since mid-season) and then complely worn out and with his ankle (I’m not sure if it was the same) really hurt.
Marvin was crippled: he was present physically but completely unable to perform. He brought in the regular season 3pt shooting and defense as well as many other small things (yes, he sometimes seems to be sleep walking, but that is his style).
Al was terrible hurt and the match up with Ziggy was bad for us due to his size and his hability to knock shots from 15ft.
For the people who bring back the “poor showing” against Miami argument, I say 2 things:
a) The refereeing was killing us;
b) Even so, we won.
This year, hopefully we will repeat or improve the 47win mark of last year BUT with a little less dependability from the same 8 players.
I agree with some people around here that say that Woody does not feel secure enough to take risks and that is why he concentrates on winning and not on developing the bench.
Ken Strickland
July 16th, 2009
5:46 pm
DANIEL-Woodson is going into his 6th yr as Hawks HC. In the past 5yrs, he hasn’t changed his approach toward developing rookies that aren’t starters, consistently utilizing no more than 8 players and overplaying his starters. He’ll be under more pressure to succeed this yr than at any other time, so why expect an insecure control freak like him to change now, with so much on the line.
SAMUEL-NBA players, and fans with a clue, understand the WOODY FACTOR. It connsists of:
(1) knowing Woodson has been unwilling to devote time and effort into developing rookie players for his bench to replace injured starters, the possible loss of FA’s and reduce starters mins.
(2) Woodson has been unwilling or unable to manage the mins of more than 8 players, and as a result, he’s consistently overplayed his starters.
(3) Woodson has consistently demonstrated his preference for playing less talented veterans over rookies with more talent and/or potential. PG’s AJohnson, TLue and C LWright got more opportunities to start and show what they could do than younger players like SStaudamire, ALaw, BDiaw or SJones.
This means that because of the Woody factor:
(1)we wasted 2nd rd picks on SStaudemire and SJones and a 1st rd pick on ALaw, even though we needed another outside shooter, a 2nd backup center/PF and a backup PG that plays DEF, and has the ability to penetrate.
(2) We’ve had PG problems in one way or another throughout Woodson’s tenure because his issues with rookie PG’s caused us to pass on drafting Allstars like CPaul, DWilliams and BRoy.
(3) We might have missed out on signing DAnderson because of Woodson’s issues with consistently playing more than 8 players and more than 1 big. Who knows how many Bigs we might miss out on because resigning Zaza makes any big we sign now the 2nd Big off the bench, which in the past has meant 10-11 inconsistenat MPG.
It’s telling that in order to make your argument, you pretend the Hawks couldn’t have hired anything better than a comentator because in your warped way of thinking, the organization couldn’t possibly find someone better than Woodson. WITH YOU IT’S ANYTHING TO MAKE A POINT AND AVOID ADMITTING YOU MIGHT BE MISTAKEN. THE SAD THING IS, CLOWNS LIKE YOU THINK NO OTHER HC BUT WOODSON COULD HAVE TAKEN THIS TEAM TO THE PLAYOFFS THE LAST 2YRS. SAMUEL, THE ONLY THING WARPED IS YOU.
niremetal
August 11th, 2009
6:21 pm
Lol…it’s funny to look back in time and see a post on David Andersen.