Dollars and sense

Long faces might be the norm if the Hawks don't do the right things this summer.

Long faces might be the norm if the Hawks don't do the right things this summer.

HAWKSVILLE – We apologize in advance for interrupting your viewing of the NBA Finals with hypothetical questions about the Hawks, but admit it, you’ve seen enough of the Los Angeles Lakers and Orlando Magic to last all summer.

But what if Mike Bibby moves on?

And Zaza Pachulia, too?

What if Flip Murray finds a new home?

And Josh Childress stays in Greece?

What if all these hypothetical scenarios we’ve been speaking of recently go up in smoke between the draft and training camp?

What if the Hawks can’t keep their team together because of finances, dumb luck and the aggressive pursuit of their free agents by other teams?

Like most of you, I’ve (foolishly) been operating under several assumptions the past few weeks. But after speaking with several NBA players, coaches and other sources around the league over the last week, it seems we’ve all been a bit too optimistic about the chances of all these guys reuniting next season.

“Unless I’m mistaken, getting all these guys in uniform for next season will cost a whole lot more than the Hawks are used to spending,” one Eastern Conference front office man told me Monday afternoon. “Check their roster and see how many guys they spent serious money on. It’s a short list. They inherited Bibby’s big deal and now that’s gone. They signed Joe [Johnson] and Josh [Smith] to their deals. Beyond that, there wasn’t a single guy on their roster they spent mid-level money on, not one, and that says something.”

When I asked him to elaborate, he had an interesting take what we’ve watched the past few years, the last two in particular.

“They got more out of their money than a lot of other teams these last two seasons,” he said. “That’s good while it lasts. It just doesn’t last forever. Sooner or later you have to pay to win in this league. The Hawks have gotten away without paying that price the past two years. They’ve done some things that their payroll suggests they shouldn’t have. But those days are probably over, because the teams they leapfrogged in the standings the past two years are not going to stay down forever.”

There's a good chance Mike Bibby and Josh Childress might never wear Hawks jerseys again.

There's a possibility Mike Bibby and Josh Childress have worn Hawks jerseys for the last time in their NBA careers.

That’s probably true. But maybe they just made wise decisions about how to spend. They didn’t spend the kind of money championship teams do, but you have to crawl before you walk. And the Hawks crawled for years.

One player pointed to last summer’s free agent season as proof that the Hawks didn’t exactly swing for the fences and insisted that their frugal ways will come back to haunt them eventually, perhaps as soon as this summer.

“They waited until the last minute on [Smith] and had to wait for Memphis to put something on the table to get a deal done,” he said. “They lost the other Josh to Greece and then filled the holes with role players. Let’s be real man, and I’m not disrespecting anybody but signing Randolph Morris, Othello Hunter and Thomas Gardner doesn’t translate into championship moves. That sounds more like a team worried about spending some real money. And to players, that’s the kind of franchise you don’t want to deal with when you’re a free agent.”

That’s the real question for the Hawks this summer. Are they going to spend the money required to compete at the level they’ve become accustomed to the past two years?

This summer is about dollars and sense. The Hawks have to spend their cash wisely or all the work they’ve done the past few years could disappear by Labor Day.

Keeping Bibby, if that’s what the Hawks intend to do, won’t be easy. Anyone expecting Bibby to work for anything less than the mid-level is dreaming. In a league where starting point guards are at a premium (and starters that shoot as well as Bibby command even more attention), the price usually starts at the mid-level and rises. The key in the Bibby situation will be the length of the contract. If three years works for both sides (and I can’t see why it would not), then I can see the negotiations having some legs. If not, get ready for a divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable (financial) differences.

Pachulia clearly wants to come back here. He said as much during our conversation last week. But he’s been here before, in free agent land, so he knows what a player wants doesn’t always jive with the reality of his situation. Unlike when the Hawks nabbed him from Milwaukee four years ago, teams aren’t spending as freely as they were then. Still, Pachulia was a bargain four years ago at $4 million per season. He’s a bargain at that price now if the Hawks can swing it. But with the lack of quality bigs running around the league these days, that $4 million price tag might not be enough to retain Pachulia’s services.

Murray’s destined for a substantial raise from the $1.5 million the Hawks paid him last season. You don’t put together the type of season he did without seeing a surge in interest for your services. The Hawks have the benefit of being the one team in the league willing to take a chance on him last year. But sentiment crashes into reality and loses all the time in the NBA, particularly during free agency. If the Hawks want to keep Murray, a serious raise is in order.

Childress added to a bench that includes Pachulia, Murray, Mo Evans and whatever player the Hawks could take with the 19th pick in the June draft would be a massive upgrade over what they used during a 47-win season. But three different sources I’ve spoken to in recent days insist that they don’t expect Childress to return to the NBA this summer (he has until July 15 to opt out of his Greek contract or remain there for another season). The dynamics of his situation in the NBA haven’t changed from last summer. He’s still a restricted free agent and would be subject to dealing with a Hawks organization that couldn’t get a deal done with him last summer. So it was a serious miscalculation of mine to blindly assume he’d bolt Europe for the comfort of the states.

“I don’t know why he would come back,” a Western Conference scout told me. “There’s so much uncertainty in the league this summer. Teams are holding back because of the economy and plotting for the summer of 2010. Plus, he’s still bound by restricted free agency, which means he can’t really come back and shop around for the best situation. If the Hawks didn’t get a deal done with him last summer I don’t see any way they get one done now. No way.”

Two years into his NBA career no one is sure if Acie Law IV is the answer at point guard for the Hawks.

Two years into his NBA career no one is sure if Acie Law IV is the answer at point guard for the Hawks.

With Childress subtracted from the potential mix, that leaves the Hawks with gaping holes on the roster heading into the draft and free agency. And from all the conversations I’ve had, the Hawks are torn between using the 19th pick and Speedy Claxton’s contract (along with other potential considerations) to grab an established point guard or gambling that the player they deem worthy will still be available at 19.

Another split, from what I’ve gathered, is that there remains some debate as to whether any of the point guards available in this draft are better prospects at the position than Acie Law IV, who despite having spent two years on the roster still has to answer major questions about his readiness to not only be a potential starter but a solid rotation player.

The Hawks’ previous front office regime was notoriously unimpressed by point guards in past drafts. Chris Paul was “too small,” Deron Williams worried them because his “body looked too soft” and Rajon Rondo was a “reach” with the fifth pick, just to highlight a few of the explanations given for passing on three big time NBA starters at the position. That sort of faulty logic led the Hawks to draft picks like Shelden Williams (a reach if ever there was one) and botched free agent signings like Claxton (who was Paul’s backup when the Hawks whisked him away from the Hornets for a cool $25 million).

I won’t pretend to speak for Hawks GM Rick Sund, who has not indicated that he has any sort of prejudice against rookie point guards. But I also won’t assume that he’ll address the Hawks’ point guard situation in the draft.

There’s just so much work to be done in such a short period of time. For once, I can honestly say I wouldn’t want to be the Hawks’ general manager right now.

MY SPLIT SCREEN IS WORKING THESE DAYS. I’M WATCHING THE FINALS, TOO. I’m watching Orlando suffer through the same things the Hawks did when they faced Cleveland in the Eastern Conference semifinals and the same thing the Cavaliers did when they fell to the Magic in Eastern Conference finals.

Some teams just present matchup nightmares for other teams. The Magic and Lakers are about as evenly matched as two teams could be in the Finals. Spot for spot up and down the rotation there are compelling matchups (my man Mickael Pietrus did his thing again, pushing Kobe Bryant late, sinking two free throws in the final 30 seconds to help seal his team’s Game 3 win). You can’t ask for much more than that at this stage of the season, save for the somewhat tiresome Van Gundy family reunion going on every game night (Stan’s a riot from the national anthem to the post game presser but I’ve listened to just about all I can take from Jeff on the broadcast).

One thing I noticed that’s been bothersome I have to ask you to weigh in on. Is there a more disappointing player in all of these playoffs than Andrew Bynum? I know the Lakers’ big man has already had to battle back from two serious knee injuries in his young career, but he doesn’t have any bounce at all.

He’s a shell of the dude the Lakers refused to give up in any deal a couple years back and for the life of me, I don’t see why. I don’t see anything in Bynum that would make him untouchable other than he’s a legitimate 7-footer. And these days, that’s just not enough.

Shooters like Ellington could find themselves in demand on draft night.

Shooters like Ellington could find themselves in demand on draft night.

Like most people whose team of interest is already do for the season, my attention has shifted dramatically in the direction of the NBA draft.

I know it’s fool’s gold, thinking teams are going to find answers to all their problems in a shallow draft. But what else can we bank on?

Combining my two pet topics of the month, I came up with another theory that requires your input.

After watching the Magic shoot a blistering (and Finals record ) 62.5 percent from the floor to win Game 3, I wonder if some teams will have the guts to rethink their draft strategy and identify the best shooters available?

For a team like the Hawks that would mean giving serious consideration to a player like North Carolina’s Wayne Ellington with that 19th pick. If Ellington’s still on the board, chances are there won’t be a better shooter or offensive player the Hawks could take in that range. I know he doesn’t address a particular position need for the Hawks (point guard or center) but he does address a skill need (the Hawks are in desperate need of more quality shooters).

Some teams aren’t going to wait until the draft to start adding shooters. Philadelphia pulled off a trade Tuesday for one of the league’s best shooters, stealing Jason Kapono from the Raptors for Reggie Evans

Kapono, even in limited minutes, can change the game for the 76ers just by parking on the perimeter and posing as a deep threat. That’s a weapon teams will need, especially in the improving Eastern Conference. I suspect this won’t be the last trade of this kind we’ll see between now and draft night. Teams are going to be forced to explore every option they can to improve without adding salary.

Finally, and before I forget, the best NBA news of the week comes not from the Finals or the draft but from the real plague of the league – brutal officiating. We’ll have three fewer relics to pick on next year if this report in the Boston Globe is true.

Reportedly Jimmy Clark, Luis Grillo and Jack Nies are taking their combined 73 years of experience/service to the retirement village with them. Adios fellas, the hecklers will miss you.

514 comments Add your comment

Ed

June 10th, 2009
2:45 am

Sekou I am so with you on Wayne Ellington. As I posted recently he is much more athletic than he has been given credit for to go with his killer jump shot. Very nice blog, just don’t wait so long next time dude.

Ed

June 10th, 2009
3:08 am

One other thing, don’t you think the Hawks have to either extend Joe or trade him? He will be on the last year of his contract and the Hawks will once again be dealing from a much weaker position if they wait until he’s a free agent.

BarkingBulldawg

June 10th, 2009
3:33 am

thanks sekou…it has been too long but nice blog

hearing anything on marvin?

Najeh Davenpoop

June 10th, 2009
4:52 am

“After watching the Magic shoot a blistering (and Finals record ) 62.5 percent from the floor to win Game 3, I wonder if some teams will have the guts to rethink their draft strategy and identify the best shooters available?”

It’s not as simple as identifying the best shooters available. The system the Magic run wouldn’t work on teams that simply load up on shooters. Their system works because their two best shooters are taller than the people guarding them, and they have a monster rebounder to clean up the mess when they miss. (I still think it’s an ugly system that results in the worst kind of NBA basketball imaginable, but whatever.) Most teams don’t have that monster rebounder, and the shooters in this draft like Ellington are not the kind that can cause matchup problems with their height.

Najeh Davenpoop

June 10th, 2009
4:57 am

“Is there a more disappointing player in all of these playoffs than Andrew Bynum?”

Bynum’s just the tip of the iceberg… even if the Lakers win the title they will go down as one of the year’s most disappointing teams to me. When you have 7-time All-Defense selection Kobe Bryant, two 7-footers down low, and two athletic and versatile forwards in Ariza and Odom who can guard multiple positions well, there is absolutely no excuse to give up over 60% from the field to any team… let alone a team whose entire offense is based on spotting up for 3-pointers. If the Lakers played with half the discipline and toughness last year’s Celtics had, I don’t think they would have lost a game yet in these playoffs. It’s amazing how many stupid mistakes they make, particularly on defense, in every game, and Kobe Bryant is not excluded from that.

jdewayneatl

June 10th, 2009
5:05 am

I know Bibby is a nice shooter but I’m not sure if he’s the answer for the Hawks near future anymore. The guy can’t defend. I’d rather go after Raymond Felton. He’s not as good a shooter as Bibby but he has younger legs and won’t be as much a defensive liability. He could also open up Joe for the 3’s Bibby hit with his driving ability. Like everyone I’m hoping Childress comes back but wouldn’t be surprised if he didn’t. And it has been said before that the economy may be what puts the Hawks on level playing ground with other teams in free agency. No one will be spending like in years past. Plus the Hawks are one of only a handful of teams with much space under the cap.

Everything may not work as planned or hoped but I don’t think we’ll go into the season without a roster ready to compete with the best teams in the East>

nunna yo bizznezz

June 10th, 2009
5:51 am

1st off,what is all this talk about having childress signing back with the hawks,like he would have made more of a differnce than us signing flip after he left..he went for the money,and felt that he had a better chance of winning in another country than if he’d have stayed here in Atlanta,let him stay where he’s at or trade his rights to another team who is drinking the childress “cherry punch”kool aid,like u and others who comment on these hawks blogs.

2nd,you wrote,”and I’m not disrespecting anybody but signing Randolph Morris, Othello Hunter and Thomas Gardner doesn’t translate into championship moves.”
with all do respect,how do u know?

you have a coach who is too lazy to teach and develope his bench..

hunter=young,energetic,rebounder/scorer,excellent passer/needs better coaching on defense,but has the biggest upside and asset that you can’t coach,and thats having a nose for always being around the ball to make plays..

gardner=shooter/scorer/decent on defense/team player/leader..

my reference’s for my opinion on their skills are:
college play/2008 summer league play/3 games in d-league this year/brief time in game 3 to help bring the hawks back against the cavs..

summer league and d-league play are no match for nba play,but they did what they were supposed to do in both league play,and thats outperform others on the court,by playing well above their competition..
we as hawks fans should be worried if they hadn’t done so..

randolp morris,my opinion is still out on him..

but my thing is,by the comment you made about them is unfair,because if they had the playing time to get familiar with their team,there is no telling how (because we would have had a deeper bench)many other games we would have won!!

hunter and gardner would have had more of a positive effect than a negative one,and we would have been a better team if we have played them..

nunna yo bizznezz

June 10th, 2009
6:12 am

BarkingBulldawg,
i would love to see us resign marvin williams,myself..
but,my problem is that he is injury prone,and the coaching staff still has not devoloped a system or playing style to accomadate he and joe johnson when the 2 are on the floor at the same time!!

it became evident and a bit frustrating when joe was out and marvin was averaging 30+ a game..driving to the basket,going to the line,rebounding,scoring from the perimeter,shooting 3’s,and playing hella defense..

if i were to tell u that there was a player in the nba with all of those skills in the nba,and the hawks had a chance at him but he is injury prone,most on here would jump all over him..

well,we do..

but,we don’t have the coaching staff to help develope his game to be intergrated with joe’s on the court at the same time..

instead,he will continue to be a junk point scorer,scoring 12-15 pts.per game,and having 8-10 rebounds per game..

And,if you have not noticed yet,im not a big fan of this coach nor his staff..

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
6:48 am

Astro Joe,

I zigged, you zagged, LOL! When I chimed in after Melvin and RealSquawk, I thought it was a bit obvious what I was doing. The subject matter was something I think we both recognize as being beaten to death on this blog already. How many times have we battled over Smith and what he does/doesn’t do on the court? You and I alone probably own the record for the number of times we’ve tangled on the issue. How many times has “Joe Johnson sees double and triple teams” been a topic?

When I threw those two questions out there, it was for the purpose of illustrating what a relentless (yet tired) hot button the subject matter was. Even after having won ten more games and accomplished so much more, we still are talking about the same issues, because the same issues still exist, no matter how tired of talking about them we might get. And even though we say we’re tired of talking about them, we STILL talk about them!

Hence the comment “think before you answer.” I didn’t mean, think ABOUT your answer, but think before even BOTHERING to answer something that has been questioned here a million times before.

Here’s where things took a left turn at Albuquerque. I knew somebody would jump all over that post. I didn’t think it would be you, as I figured any regular who has discussed this ad nauseum would probably either bypass it or say “Oh for cryin’ out loud Ray, this AGAIN?” To which I would reply with a mischievous grin….

As it was, only Melvin seemed to get it by replying, “Do I have to think if my answer to your question is LMAO”

Sorry Joe, your post ended up as the second part of the smarmy joke I had planned. I really didn’t think it was going to be you who bit on that one, but it appears you are still in fine mid-season form, LOL! I really didn’t have more than a fleeting interest in the conversation between Melvin and RealSquawk (no offense, but been there enough times already).

However, the stats you dug up ARE very informative. Next time I’ll email the script beforehand, that way you’ll at least know ahead of time if you’re going to win “Best Supporting Actor” in a hit blog drama…

;)

JustaThought

June 10th, 2009
6:53 am

I think the commentator’s of the finals has already stated that Bynum has no left in his legs because he haven’t had the chance to really build up his strength in the knee since his return. Besides it’s his 1st finals, remember he was out last year when they played. I think both him and the coaches got him going half speed cause he has no left, and they are just getting what they can from the young fellow. I see other issues the Lakers will have to address for next season, especially the pg position. Fish is probably playing his last year (his play during these playoffs have been bad to say the least), and Farmer for whatever reason is not consistant at all.

JustaThought

June 10th, 2009
7:02 am

The Majic shot 60+ percent for the entire game but barely won the game. To think that Kobe is going to go scoreless a 2nd half again or play as horrible is “wishful” thinking. Orlando is skating on very thin ice.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
7:06 am

Sekou,

Some of us agree with you, and have been sending out these warnings since the early part of this last season. It’s all too true that the Hawks have gotten by on the cheap, something the ASG has accused former member Steve Belkin of.

Some will contend that these guys have plenty of money. Fine. Some will say that they have made the wise, sage decisions that smarter organizations make. All well and good. As you say, at some point, the rubber meets the road. I’d rather not find out the hard way. I am leery of the cheap-a$$ gamble moves. If they continue to work, then I have to shut my mouth. My gut tells me that’s not going to cut it anymore.

One of the things I believe the most is that other teams that we’ve vaulted past will catch us if we don’t make enough of the right moves. Why? Because some of them have made moves with an eye towards the future.

WHY we are still having questions at point guard is a mystery to me. And that’s just ONE ongoing issue. There are others…

Perfect off season

June 10th, 2009
7:26 am

Here is the Hawks perfect off season. Let Bibby walk. Sign Ben Gordon. Sign Flip. Sign ZaZa. Sign Marvin Williams. Now the big one. Trade Josh Smith, Speedy’s expiring contract and #19 in the draft for Stoudemire from Phoenix. New line up: PG – Gordon, Law SG – J.J, Flip SF – Marvin Williams, Mo Evans PF- Al Horford, ZaZa, C – Stoudemire, ZaZa This team could compete for it all. Built much like the Magic. Down low with Stoudemire and Horford and shooters like M. Wiliams, J.J. and Ben Gordon. The trade salaries work and the Ben Gordon would sign for not much more than the $10 million that Bibby played for last year. Your thoughts?

smartguy

June 10th, 2009
7:27 am

WHAT ABOUT OUR AFWUL, AWFUL COACH??

A Tribe Called Quest

June 10th, 2009
7:39 am

We all know Sekou’s upcoming blog:

“Solomon Jones is looking ripped as hell. Has added 20 pounds of pure muscle and is ready for the Hawks to resign him.”

“Scouts are saying that Smoove is looking stronger than ever and may be the MVP next year”

“Marvin is working on his African Studies Degree and has added 30 pounds of muscle

———
It’s very annoying to me that there is hardly any replay used in NBA games. It’s so obvious that in every game there are 3 egregious calls by the refs which should be reviewed. Why is most of the reviewing done in MLB? Nobody watches baseball anymore

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
7:42 am

Niremetal,

We’ve discussed before that sometimes you just have to pay more for what you need. The Sixers have BEEN needing a shooter, and they need one more than they needed another rebounder. These guys rebound well as a team, and have done so WITHOUT Elton Brand. Speaking of which, with sure-thing low post threat Brand returning, the debut of Eddie Jordan as coach (with his Princeton style offense), and the running ability of most of this team….I doubt Kapono will have trouble getting some open looks and doing what he does best. Was it the best deal they could have done? Maybe, maybe not.

But they needed a shooter, and they got one. Evans was giving them 3.3ppg/4.6rpg in 14.4 mpg, while shooting a not-so-hot 44% from the field. I don’t think that was too big a price to pay.

Sure beats signing whoever’s left on top of the scrap heap during the 11th hour. Stay tuned for THAT show….

A Tribe Called Quest

June 10th, 2009
7:49 am

We have to address our center needs?

Can Woodson or Sund please finalize our center position? Is Horford a center or PF? Is Smoove a PF or SF? Are we going to get a real center? I know Sund likes Horford at center

What a mess

Willie Coyote

June 10th, 2009
7:52 am

I believe Sund will seek a sign & trade for Marvin. The question is what will they try to get for Marvin, a PG or center? The other problem will be whether they can get enough quality in return to justify letting MArvin go; that’s questionable in my humble opinion. It’s also questionable if they will have enough to sign Marvin with all the other guys they have to sign.

Speaking of the other guys, they need to sign Zaza & Flip definitely. If Bibby is the best option then they need to make the effort to retain him but they cannot break the bank or get caught in a bad long-term deal with a guy who’s on the downward slope of his career. I don’t see Childress coming back and giving up that much money even if he is unhappy in Greece.

Unfortunately, I don’t see any moves the Hawks can make that make them championship caliber (playoff appearances are nice but if you never compete for a title then …). If they can replace the dead weight on their bench with some who can contribute, then that will be a good step towards challenging for a division title but they still need an impact guy at 1 or 5 to get any further.

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
8:01 am

At some point, someone will have to explain to me how acquiring the last year and a half of Bibby’s monster contract and refusing to overpay for Smoove qualifies as “on the cheap.”

Assuming the Hawks maintain payroll this year, they’ll be fine. Bibby will be getting at least a $7M paycut, Speedy gets a $500k paycut because of his frontloaded contract, and that can be used to give the necessary raises to Marvin, Flip, and Zaza without increasing payroll. I admit that they need to do something else to have a real shot, but I really think that “something else” could be done just be acquiring one decent player for near the mid-level, a move that would be payroll-neutral if we find a way to trade Speedy’s expiring contract.

Anyway, I’ve seen no evidence that the ASG rolls on the cheap ever since it became clear that Belkin wasn’t going to be able to buy them out. Anyway, for anyone who is interested, here’s a recent article based on an interview with Gearon, talking about the Spirit’s finances.

glw

June 10th, 2009
8:05 am

I do agree that Atlanta will try to operate on the cheap if they can, not sure all those guys will be back. I think Sund will build his team with a solid 9 man rotation and fill out the rest of the roster with young players. IF the right move comes along, I think he might pull the trigger either a trade or a free agent signing.

Here is my take:

Zaza Pachulia might have to be top priority simply based on the fact that teams overpay for big men. Zaza is probably worth no more than the 4 million that he was signed for previously. But because the Hawks are size deficient, his value is enhanced and you probably have to overpay. Since most teams are capped out, most likely a playoff contender that needs that missing piece (rebounding, interior toughness) will most likely use its full mid level exception to sign him. If I am Sund, I go after him and try to lock him up early, I would start out with something like 4/20 million and hope he likes Atlanta. If Zaza leaves, then a backup plan must be formulated. Assuming they pass on a big man in the draft, there are other options. Solo can always be brought back and be developed as a backup center which might not be a bad idea, he has better offensive game than Zaza, and will continue to get better I think, and could be had probably cheap, 3yr 6-7 million. As insurance, I would look to bring in a journey big man like Magloire.

Mike Bibby and/or Flip Murray

The Hawks must bring back at least one of them, maybe both if the price is right. Neither is great defensively, but at least one is needed for his offense. Should the Hawks decide to go after a restricted free agent (Sessions, Jack) or seek a trade, I think one of these guys doesnt come back. Whomever comes back, they will be used as a combo type guard. Murray has an edge in that he is a little bit of a better fit for playing both guard spots. Also you must figure in the fact that the Hawks will most likely draft a point (Lawson, Maynor, Mills). And then there still is Acie Law in the mix. Sund will have to figure that by keeping both you limit the growth of any younger players. Woodson has proven he will go with the vets every time. So he might be tempted to take away one of his crutches.

Marvin Williams and/or Josh Childress

I think this is more clear cut, it will be one or the other. Both are restricted, so the Hawks have right of first refusal. A year ago, I think most would have agreed that Childress was the keeper. But Marvin’s improved his offensive repertoire. I think Sund will play a wait and see game much like what he did last year with J Smoove. Marvin’s play improved, but teams tend not to overpay for small forwards that average 14ppg. Most likely it will be Sunds call, either to let him play out and be unrestricted next year or go ahead and lock him up long term. With the addition of FlipMo last year, Childress wasnt missed as much as was first feared. The Hawks hope for a sign and trade, but again, the market might be a bit bullish this year.

Potential trades

There will be plenty of trades as teams want to clear space for next summer and might be willing to part with certain players. Chris Bosh looks almost like a sure thing that he will walk and the Raptors might deal him to get something in return. Amare could be on his way out. Atlanta would be good suitors, they would have to part with either Josh or Horford to get one of those and maybe some expiring contracts for next year (Evans, Law, Claxton).

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
8:07 am

Ray,

You know me – I love guys like Reggie Evans who play tough, smart basketball and leave all on the floor whenever they’re out there. I think every team needs at least one scrappy guy like that in their frontcourt, and it just pains me to see the Sixers give up their only one for a guy as soft and one-dimensional as Kapono. I admit that the trade looks good on paper. But I think Evans is one of those guys whose value doesn’t show up on the stat sheets.

darrell starks

June 10th, 2009
8:21 am

Sekou im say this i recently am a season ticket holder because i saw improvement of the team and it was hard for me to come and support the hawks because of bad management, money was never and issue with this team back then its just they made bad decision on players, but every since ASG took over its seem like its not about the fans its about money and trying to be cheap,so far they have bin lucky for the succes of the team once i see ASG trying to cut payroll and be cheap i will not renew my tickets point blank period.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

dap01

June 10th, 2009
8:25 am

Thanks Sekou, what you lack in quantity, you make up with quality. Lots of good stuff.

The Hawks organization is cheap, leaderless, directionless and they have sub standard coaching. We went through many years of lottery and we have a group of forwards to show for it. Everyone knows that PG and Center are the hardest positions to find. We have one PG and yet our coach chooses to simply have a slow, no defense PG shoot threes so that he does not have to have the responsibility to develop a PG.

Woody has a poor offense and poor player development because he has nothing to offer. There is no evidense of him having anything.

Perhaps Sund has a plan, as of yet I can not tell that he does. He says that he is looking for wins and that is all. I hope that he surprises me.

The Hawks need help at PG and at Center and a shooter off of the bench.
Once we have a balanced team, perhaps we can coach them to another level.

I read as much as possible about the Hawks, I love pulling for the Hawks but being a Hawk fan is painful.

darrell starks

June 10th, 2009
8:27 am

This year the hawks payroll was 68million and ranked 22nd in the league and they made the most out of nothing if they want to go to the next level they will have spend more money.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 10th, 2009
9:06 am

niremetal,

we had to wait for another team to offer Smoove before we did. That means we are so d*mn concerned about money that we can’t even come up with an offer on our own for a team star, so we had to use poor Memphis in order to get it done

the problem isn’t that our owners are cheap…The problem is that no good FA’s come here.

Can you believe the only “good” FA to come here in years is Joe, who we had to give the max deal to, plus he was the 4th best on PHX (which is why he wanted to leave)? The only FA’s we have gotten are Lorenzen, resigning T.Lue, ZaZa (no one knew who he was), Speedy, and 9-12th men so bad that they wouldn’t make another roster.

That’s the problem

Sekou Smith

June 10th, 2009
9:13 am

Nire has a good point when looking at the Hawks’ payroll bill since Bibby arrived. They took a temporary hit and got the desired results. But does that kind of strategy lead to long term success? I think there’s a feeling around the league that the Hawks were a bit lucky the past two years (courtesy of their timely rise while other teams in the Eastern Conference slid down the food chain). We’ll see if that’s the case this season.

Filling out a roster with four or five projects is fine for a 13-win team. For a serious contender, those spots have to be occupied by veterans that can hit the floor and produce on a moment’s notice. Look at Orlando’s bench. Those are quality vets on that bench (save for Jeremy Richardson, who has worn a Hawks uniform twice in between stints in Miami, Orlando and the D-League). Same goes for the Lakers, Denver, Cleveland and any other team serious about chasing a title.

I don’t have a problem with how much the Hawks spend, everybody is looking for the best bang for their buck. It’s how they spend that would be my focus now and in the future.

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
9:24 am

Good stuff Sekou. I definitely like the concept of the “best shooter available”. That also suggests that the Hawks need to bring back Marvin, a young shooter who will likely become more consistent in the next year or two.

Here’s the one thing I don’t understand about the Childress situation… is it better to come back this summer or next summer? If I had a choice of going to a party with Denzel, George Clooney and Terrance Howard or going to a party with Mo, Larry and Curly, I’m choosing the latter party because I think the odds of me pulling a dime piece grow exponentially. So why would Chill return to the NBA when LeBron, Wade, Kobe, Amare (maybe), Bosh & Joe (among others) are in the Denzel/Clooney role of pulling the best offers next summer? Seems to me that if stays this summer, he needs to plan on staying until his Greek contract expires in another 2 summers. That, I think, is what he and his agent need to contemplate.

And like Ray said, many of us have been complaining about cats like RandMo, Hunter, West & Gardner occupying almost 33% of the roster positions for several months now. Throw in Solo and you in fact have a third of the roster full of potential/hopeful/maybe/someday. That just does not seem like a team built to win a title.

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
9:29 am

Oh and the notion that the Hawks performance was better than their investment is exactly what each and every business owner desires. If the ASG received an unexpectedly better ROI, then others shouldn’t hate on them. But any wise business owner doesn’t assume that the sun will shine forever on their business. That’s why this summer will be critical. We’ll see if they continue to gamble that they can get Maxima-level performance from a Dodge Neon type investment.

bali

June 10th, 2009
9:38 am

great article. who was the talking head that crowned Jeff van Gundy as the expert basketball commentator. Seems like someone would realize how grating it is to indure 3 hours of listening to Jeff. The college game is worse thoughwith Dickie V………..

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
9:39 am

Melvin, from the last blog. Joe had a miserable playoff series this past season. I attended game four of the Celtics series, so while I recognize that he wasn’t great in that entire series, he was incredible in game 4 (and I was sitting next to a loud and obnoxious Celtics fans and Joe gave me more than enough to clown him throughout the game). I’ve said it before, the Hawks are an ensemble cast. Five guys averaged double figures during the regular season. We shouldn’t expect to go in the playoffs and have Joe (or any single player) produce at an elite level. We’re not built that way.

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
9:47 am

Last thing and then I need to go across town for a meeting. It is hard to believe that the 7th PG in a draft could be better than the 2nd PG in the draft. Maybe it is a “system/fit” issue. Acie seemingly excels when he keeps the ball like a traditional PG. But our offense is more like what we see with the Lakers, in the sense that the PG isn’t the primary distributor and is mostly needed (at least in the half court sets) as a shooter. So if the 7th PG chosen is more of a short SG with PG dribbling skills, then he could, in theory, be a better fit in our current offensive scheme. That sounds a little like Toney Douglas to me (but not at #19, trade down 3-4 spots and grab him).

Daddyrich

June 10th, 2009
9:47 am

1) Offer Marvin and Pachulia about $6 mil per season for 3-4 years
2) Let Bibby walk unless he will sign for about the same as Marvin and Pachulia
3) Offer Flip 2 years at 3mil per
4) Draft Ty Lawson if he is there at 19 if Flip or Bibby dont sign
5) Sign a decent big man for around the mid level or trade for one using Speedy’s expiring contract (5 mil)
6) Childress is staying in Greece because he is in the same situation as last year. We can talk about him again next summer.

Rick Sund has a tough job ahead this summer. He also has a suspect draft history. He may use the pick to get a veteran in a trade since he is weak at scouting talent.

Aaron

June 10th, 2009
10:08 am

The Hawks, like 80% of the teams in the NBA, are NOT going to go over the luxury tax.

I’m not exactly sure what you are implying they should’ve spent more on over the past few years. Until this past season, they’ve not had a team WORTHY of spending money on. And, when it was finally time to add quality depth, they added Flip and Evans, two players who had a significant impact on the team.

As far as the draft, I can easily see the Hawks taking a catch-and-shoot guy like Ellington or Thornton. That is, if they’re still committed to Acie Law. That’s the real question of the offseason to me – what to do with Law.

Jones

June 10th, 2009
10:11 am

Interesting that they are supposedly considering trading for a veteran point guard. Who in the world could they be after? Most of the legit starters worth persuing are either untouchable or free agents (Bibby, Kidd, Miller, Sessions). At a glance I only see two available, and both have bad contracts: Hinrich and Baron Davis. Any idea who they might be considering, Sekou?

gtm

June 10th, 2009
10:20 am

“If I had a choice of going to a party with Denzel, George Clooney and Terrance Howard or going to a party with Mo, Larry and Curly, I’m choosing the latter party because I think the odds of me pulling a dime piece grow exponentially.”

The other way to look at it is what ladies are showing up if the Stooges are all there is to pick from? Teams are creating cap space for 2010, and only one of them is going to sign Lebron. After all the big signings are done, maybe there will still be more money available then than this summer.

Clyde

June 10th, 2009
10:31 am

***Yawn*** This blog has got boring as hell. Anyone down for a trip to Rio? And will we have a draft party this year?

Sekou Smith

June 10th, 2009
10:44 am

Clyde, your hate knows no bounds. I love it. I’m down for Rio. Keep the draft party.

Hinrich has to be on the short list for every team hunting a veteran PG Jones. So does Sessions. Jarrett Jack will surely get some looks. You figure all those guys will give you more, faster, than any rookie (drafted at 19) could.

The problem with that list Daddyrich is that the draft comes before the free agent feeding frenzy. So whatever the Hawks do has to start on draft night.

MannyT

June 10th, 2009
10:45 am

Sekou, with apologies to Dennis Green…

We aren’t who we thought we weren’t? Then who the heck are we?

Good topic. Phil Jackson has the triangle, Stan Van Gundy has the umbrella (Howard holds up the middle, surround with 3 pt shooters,) and the Hawks have…ISO Joe? Here is how I see the root of our problem.

BK had an idea of what this team should be. He selected players to fit that long, lean, everyone is similar size thing. However, that did not work for Woody and we know who survived that Philips Arena cage match.

Along comes Sund. He slow plays the hand. It makes sense because he came in at the tail end of last season. Now that he has had time to check under the hood, he is on the spot to make some decisions…that Woody can tolerate.

If not, I expect coach vs gm part 2…Which is stronger, the Sun or the Wood?

Bottom line, it’s kinda of tricky to determine which free agents you really want to fight for if you don’t know the style you want to play.

BWAF

HawkKingBibby

June 10th, 2009
11:04 am

Sekou, who would you rather have as Hawks point guard next season if salaries were all equal? Bibby, Hinrich, Sessions, Luke Rid ( who I think Sund will go after), Jack, Andre Miller or Acie ( I know he is much cheaper but he is on our team so I had to throw him in there)? Please choose only 1 and tell us why. Thank you.

SSI FAN

June 10th, 2009
11:04 am

Despite the denials by Sund and others, the financial condition of ASG has to be considered. There is still the pending lawsuit with Belkin and the uncertainty as which side will prevail. (Remember when Stern said the ownership issue would be resolved in February of this year. Well the trial court hasn’t ruled yet and then there will most likely be an appeal which could take several months to be decided.) Remember the article saying that one of the owners could not make his contributions toward operating losses and would have to give up part of his ownership interest.

Also consider the undisclosed fact that ASG has engaged Goldman-Sachs to locate a purchaser for the Hawks, Thrashers, and the arena.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 10th, 2009
11:13 am

How can people put Hinrich and Sessions/Jack in the same sentence? Hinrich makes like 8 mill a year–Jack will never make more than 3 or 4 mill…Easy choice

And why are teams so scared about going over the cap/luxury tax? These owners are supposed to be RICH MILLIONAIRES. $5 million for them is like us spending 20 bucks on a steak dinner. It’s neither here nor there

MannyT

June 10th, 2009
11:13 am

Astro, gtm hit the nail on the head.

Just remember, the average gal at an NBA party is probably hotter than almost all the babes at a Stooges party…and not all of them will leave with a baller.

Chills should stay in Greece. Your scenario skips over what he experienced last summer. First, as a restricted free agent he will have limited options. Second, because more teams are clearing cap room for your Ocean’s Eleven all star free agent class, there should be more opportunity to get a better offer from a team that finishes with honorable mention status in the superstar sweepstakes. Third, a potentially better economy in 2010 means a higher salary cap and higher MLE, thus more potential for a better deal.

BWAF

Sekou Smith

June 10th, 2009
11:26 am

That’s too easy HawkKing. I’d take Bibby. I know what I’m getting with him as a starter (I won 47 games with him and made it to the Eastern Conference semifinals with him leading the way). I’m gambling with everyone else, even a veteran like Andre Miller, because I don’t know how he’ll mix with this team. Hinrich would be my second choice. I know he’s a good defender and is a decent shooter and is tough as nails. Sessions would be my third choice, because I can see big things from him down the road. But I don’t know if I’m ready to turn over my 47-win team to a guy that I’m not completely sold on.

That’s just what I think, though. Had this not been a multiple choice test but a fill in the blank, I’d have given you another answer.

GeeMack

June 10th, 2009
11:34 am

Sekou being that The Clipper will be Having a fire sale to get rid of at least one of the big men they have. Is there any way we can get Chris Kaman?

[...] to Sekou Smith, NBA teams will be willing to spend even less money this summer: “Three different sources I’ve spoken to in recent days insist that they [...]

UGA

June 10th, 2009
11:36 am

What are the chances we sign Bibby and nab a Hinrich/Jack/Sessions?

If we spent around 68 million last year and are sitting around 40 now, hopefully we can get Speedy’s deal out of here and keep these guys….

Reggie

June 10th, 2009
11:44 am

Sekou

Any chance the hawks try to move up from the 19th spot to get one of those point guards? If it was me I would move up & see if I can get a guy like Jrue Holiday or Jonny Flynn.

TheHawksFan

June 10th, 2009
11:51 am

The Hawks had the most “Cost Effective” season of all the teams in the NBA. A shooter and BIG remain the Focus. But the Economy is REAL make no mistake. Look for ALL the teams in the league to carry less players. If thew Hawks can “Hold the Course” with a couple of adjustments in hand they will still be ok. BUT everybody wants a Championship. Only way to do that is to add one of the best. Kobe Howard King James, Mello D Wade, because you can bet that 1 of the fore mentioned players will be in the Finals for the next few years. Bosh Stoudermire and the rest wont get it done. To BEAT the best you have to be the BEST. So if not STAY the COURSE!!! Add a little FAVOR and you never Know!! GOOOOO Hawks!!!

darrell starks

June 10th, 2009
11:56 am

First we dont need to waste money on jarrett jack or no hinrich or session or bibby thats waste money in my opinion put that money to good use and sign flip zaza and solO first.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SWAT Native

June 10th, 2009
12:01 pm

SSI Fan,

I agree with you. I was thinking this morning that perhaps the biggest priority offseason move for the Hawks is to finally resolve their ownership situation, and that may make the rest of the moves going forward that much easier.

MannyT

June 10th, 2009
12:01 pm

Quest, it’s always easier to spend someone else’s money.

It’s a lot easier for me to say you should go to Bone’s for lunch today and get a spinach salad, not a steak.

The reality is that it is more than the money. There is also a level of flexibility in team planning that you lose. Look at the Knicks. The owner, James Dolan, has cash & spent way over the cap. That did not mean more wins, just more luxury tax payments to other owners.

BWAF

darrell starks

June 10th, 2009
12:03 pm

If chill dont come back its a must we resign marvin and bring him back if chill do come back we can do a sign and trade with marvin or just keep him the option will be good for us.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

HawkKingBibby

June 10th, 2009
12:08 pm

Sekou ,Im with you on Bibby as well. How quickly folks forget where this team was without Bibby.I would love to keep Bibby and somehow move up to get Curry in the draft to develope behind Mike for a year or two. I hear people compare Curry to Bibby in a negative fashion. They say the best he can be is another Mike Bibby. How fast we have forgotten just how good Bibby was in his early Sactown years. He was one ” mysteriously refed” game away from likely leading his team to winning an nba title. Id love to know who your fill in the blank guy is and if there is a realistic chance of the Hawks aquiring him.

Ray S

June 10th, 2009
12:15 pm

Sekou, Who is your “fill in the blank” choice?

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
12:15 pm

The ownership situation is no longer really in doubt. Belkin is gonna get bought out. The only Q is who does the appraisal and how much it’ll be. That certainly will make some impact, but I can pretty much promise you that the Hawks’ spending won’t be affected by that. Assuming you have a minimum level of assets (which ASG most certainly does), team salaries are set based on cash flows, not fixed assets. So the buyout of Belkin won’t affect the Hawks’ payroll, because it won’t alter whether the Hawks turn an operating profit. The state of the economy and how that affects ticket sales and other operating revenues WILL affect payroll, but that is true of every team.

That being said, $5M is not chump change if you’re not making the operating revenues to back it up. Just as the underlying assets rarely affect payroll, the fact that these guys are rich won’t really affect their willingness to pay the luxury tax. As MannyT implied, these guys are businessmen. They won’t spend money unless they know they’ll earn it back. So going into luxury tax land – where every $1 spent means you have to earn $2 more in order to justify the expense – is not a move that a smart business would make unless they’re pretty sure they’ll make that money back.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
12:19 pm

Some really good comments by MannyT and Astro Joe.

I realize the ASG spent a decent chunk this past year by retaining Bibby. The cheap stuff has been on the bench, as Sekou originally said. We got good bang for the buck from Pachulia and Flip. Anything else that wasn’t a starter was forgettable, and that’s putting it nicely.

Sure, Bibby has to take a paycut to stay (if he stays), but how much of one? The other question is what are we doing for a backup/future pg? Sorry, but Bibby as a starter for 34+ mpg and Flip as backup to both Joe AND Bibby isn’t going to cut it. And that’s just assuming that we retain him…which will be more expensive.

I like the idea of picking up a guard in the draft, be it pg or sg. I’m pulling for just about anything but a low post player. Why? Anybody worth having will already be snapped up.

15 more days until the draft. *Yawn*…

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
12:30 pm

Niremetal,

No, the ownership situation certainly is NOT in doubt. And nobody cares about Belkin anymore, I’m sure. Perhaps now with Bibby taking a paycut (assuming he’s re-signed here), we can wisely spend money elsewhere, in places it’s needed.

Well, once we’re guaranteed to earn back what we spend, of course. I’d sure like to know how to guarantee such a thing…

darrell starks

June 10th, 2009
12:31 pm

Sekou im continue to say this on your blog only if chill come back make this trade horford and marvin and the 19pick for bosh and chill can starte at the 3position.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 10th, 2009
12:35 pm

How about Smoove + Speedy + picks for Kaman + Zbo?

Lets get some real bigs in here

Can we please see a freaking trade for once

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 10th, 2009
12:51 pm

Sign- Flip, ZAZA, Birdman,Marvin
Draft -Terrance Williams, Toney Douglas,Patty Mills, C Jerrels……Any two of the 4

Hms

June 10th, 2009
12:55 pm

Yes, let’s get Kaman and Randolph. Then the Clippers won’t look like the most stupid organization in the league anymore. Kaman is twice the big man that Horford and Smith are. Twiced the missed games per season that is. Randolph is twice the big man too. Twice the headache for the coach and between him and Kaman probably twice the price of Horford and Smith combined.

Daddyrich

June 10th, 2009
1:03 pm

Youre right Sekou. I guess the draft will be a big clue as to what the Hawks will do after July 1st with these free agents. I agree that with money not part of the factor of the pg’s listed above, Bibby is the best choice.

SWAT Native

June 10th, 2009
1:34 pm

Niremetal,

Very insightful response. I wasn’t just thinking about the financial position of the ownership group, but I think any organization would be better off if they could get a distraction like a lawsuit among the partners resolved.

Doesn’t anybody want to bite on SSI’s suggestion that ASG has quietly put the Hawks, Thrashers and Philip Arena on the market?

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
1:41 pm

Sekou, I think Bibby’s worth to the Hawks has been magnified because we havent had a steady PG in years. But I would not want Bibby for 3 more years. I agree he is a shot maker, and he has swagger. But he is getting slower, his defense is bad (which forces Joe to guard quick PG’s, and our bigs end up out of position), and he doesnt penetrate and dish. Bibby is merely a stop gap.

Speaking of Chemistry, Orlando acquired Rafer Alston during the season, and he fit right in. If we get a new PG during the offseason, they will have a chance to learn our offense (whatever that might be) and mesh with our players. I would much rather have Jack or Sessions than Bibby. They probably cost less, they are much younger, more upside, their defense is better, and they can work on their shot making. Plus in 3 years, they are still young.

I do like Hinrich too, but he makes over $8 mil per, and I dont know if we have the assets to trade for him.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
1:42 pm

Bibby for 3 years? No way. 2 at the most. And if we trade #19 and go out and get another aging pg(Lue, AJ, Craig),I’m done with this team. PERIOD! I’m sick and tired of all of these stop-gap pg’s. We need our pg of the future. We have to take a chance this year, with the draft being so pg heavy. We just have to. If we miss, we miss, but we better take one. Fire Woody’s dumbass if he has a problem with it.

sd

June 10th, 2009
1:43 pm

I think we lose Bibby, and either Joe or Josh.

Honestly, unless Josh learns to shoot, it should be him. We have Mark Price there to teach. Last off season we found out what he could do by watching the improved shot of Marvin Williams. So far, Josh has lacked the work ethic needed to improve. He has one of the WORST jump shots I’ve ever seen. Other than that HUGE hole in his game, he is a beast.

But the fact is that this team can NOT win it all without getting a true center. We need a BIG man.

sd

June 10th, 2009
1:44 pm

And can ANYONE tell me how much longer we have to pay Speedy Claxton for nothing?????

Speedy Claxton is to the Hawks; as Mike Hampton was to the Braves

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
1:47 pm

Nunnayobizznezz, excellent post about Gardner and Hunter. I agree totally. Once again Sekou, it’s all about the players, and not the Coach. Come on now, your’re better than that.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
1:51 pm

Mike Bibby will be a Laker next year. IMO. A STOP-GAP of course, but he’ll be a Laker.

cp

June 10th, 2009
1:57 pm

Last summer Sund was kind of slow with everything and it worked out. I don’t think he can afford to do that this summer.

Dennis

June 10th, 2009
2:05 pm

I say we do a sign & trade on Bibby, #19, & Claxton’s contract to get Johnny Flynn from Syracuse. Mark my words, he’s going to be something in the pro’s, along the lines of CP, & athletically, he is probably a shade better than CP, according to the #’s he put up at the NBA’s measurables camp. He’s also a leader. Law will be a good back up, but he doesn’t have the X factor, he didn’t have it in college either. In college, he was a scoring point guard but struggled to put the ball in the hoop, his stroke is suspect. He reminds me of a small Jalen Rose, which if he can get some fire lit inside of him, would make him a great pro as Jalen was.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
2:37 pm

Astro, what about Jeff Teague?

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
2:39 pm

Hell no to Ridnhour!

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
2:45 pm

Tribe called Quest, they are rich Millionaires, but have you seen the stock market lately. I’ve lost thousands myself, so just imagine how much they’ve lost. I’m not defending em, just saying.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
2:50 pm

Sekou, I’d have to go with Hinrich over Bibby. He’s faster, he can shoot just as good as Bibby, considering Bibby is on and off like a light switch. And he plays DEFENSE, unlike the before mentioned.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
2:51 pm

Hinrich can also guard the opposing pg like he is SUPPOSED to do.

MBZ

June 10th, 2009
3:02 pm

The problem is the offensive philosophy. We hear Sund say that he wants to model this team after the 2004 Pistons, but this team leans on Joe Johnson to much for offense. When we get a coach that has a grasp of what it means to utilize and develop players then we can start addressing free agency. Does Sund go with the guy that is best for the team? Or does he go with the guy Woodson wants? An already hard process becomes even harder when you have a coach that refuses to reimagine his offense.

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
3:03 pm

tb, I agree 100%. Bibby is a stop gap, and a liability. Get a solid young PG (who will be here for more than 3 years), like Jack or Sessions, and then draft a PG (or develop Acie), to go along with Flip.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
3:04 pm

I’d rather just draft a pg and let Acie, Flip, and the rookie battle it out.

ant banks

June 10th, 2009
3:08 pm

the rest of the league will start dealin’ july 1st. the hawks will start dealin’ aug. 1st for the scraps left in free agency.

they have been doin’ this for the last 3 friggin’ years, why should i believe this year will be any diff?

ant banks

June 10th, 2009
3:10 pm

TERRELL,

accordin’ to all of the sites that i have been readin’, none of the guards comin’ out are as accomplished as acie law was comin’ out of college?

why waste a 19th pick on a guard? package it with somethin’ else is what i say.

ant banks

June 10th, 2009
3:13 pm

if we don’t make hella moves this summa, i see us droppin’ back to battlin’ for the 8th seed in the east. clev, boston, orlando have the top 3 locked up. philly is gettin’ betta as i type, indy will be betta, miami will be in the mix, big time, chicago will be betta, charlotte, too.

i don’t see how hawks will maintain 4th seed if they don’t lock up some major pieces

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
3:16 pm

HawkKigBibby, taking nothing away from Mike Bibby, as he has definetely helped this team, but when you’ve been trotting out guys like Tyronne “dribble,dribble” Lue and Anthony “old enough to be my grandaddy” Johnson, you cant go anywhere but up.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
3:28 pm

“As accomplished as Acie Law was coming out of college”? That means absolutely nothing. Sheldon Williams was one of the most ACCOMPLISHED players ever, coming out of College. Look at him now. The draft is a crap shoot. You just gotta hope and pray.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
3:34 pm

There’s a rumor going around that the Jazz will let Boozer walk, use his salary to re-sign Milsap, and go after a FA like Zaza Pachulia with the leftovers. Good luck Zaza. Tell us how it feels to play for a real Head Coach.

Hawksfanatic

June 10th, 2009
3:43 pm

This Eastern executive (my guess is a Pacer because they spend a lot with little results lately) surely doesn’t know our roster. We spent more than the MLE on Speedy Claxton, sure he doesn’t play but we did spend it. I also don’t know what the difference is between signing a contract and “inheriting” one. You have to trade contracts that you signed at some point in time to be able to “inherit” someone like Bibby, so outside of semantics whats the difference?

Ramon

June 10th, 2009
3:46 pm

Sekou, what would have been the answer for the fill in the blank? You know we’re anxious to see.

Ramon

June 10th, 2009
3:47 pm

I’m curious to know everyone’s opinion. Would you be willing to trade Marvin, Joe, and Speedy’s contract for CP and Stojakovic?

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
3:55 pm

Read a rumor that said Utah will let Boozer walk, re-sign Milsalp, and sign a guy like Palchulia with the leftovers. It this comes to fruition, Good luck Zaza. Let us know how it feels to play for a REAL Head Coach.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
3:56 pm

Sorry for the double post. The 1st one disappeared and the re-appeared. Wtf? lol!

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
4:00 pm

Ramon, in a heartbeat. CP3’s dont come around that often. He’d turn Horford and Smith into All-Stars, just like he did David West. Can we have Chandler instead of Peja if we throw in #19? lol!!

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
4:02 pm

if we don’t make hella moves this summa, i see us droppin’ back to battlin’ for the 8th seed in the east. clev, boston, orlando have the top 3 locked up. philly is gettin’ betta as i type, indy will be betta, miami will be in the mix, big time, chicago will be betta, charlotte, too.

i don’t see how hawks will maintain 4th seed if they don’t lock up some major pieces

Didn’t people say the same thing last year about us maintaining the 8th seed? Just sayin’.

I’ll say what I did a year ago: The East is still the East. We need to make “hella moves” if we want to crack the top 3. But resigning everyone and picking up one decent rotation player should be enough to make sure we finish 4-6 next year.

I know everyone will say “no, we’re on the way down,” but we’re still one of the league’s 2-3 youngest teams. Horford will be a little better; Marvin was (to paraphrase Sekou) having a breakout year before he went down, as anyone who watched actual games this year knows; and Smoove will rebound from a sub-par season. Long as we re-sign our Big 4 free agents, we’ll make the playoffs. Long as we do that and pick up 1 decent rotation player, we’ll cruise into the 4-5 seed.

And even if that weren’t true, Philly is most certainly NOT getting better as we speak, They’re trying to figure out what the hell to do with Elton Brand since they’re locked into his huge contract for the foreseeable future. Miami is an even worse jumble of mismatched pieces. Detroit is rebuilding. Charlotte showed guts last year, but they’re still a long way off, especially if Felton leaves. Indy is WAY overrated (does anyone here REALLY think that Danny Granger would score 22ppg or Troy Murphy would average 15ppg if he played for a coach that made his team play defense every once in awhile?). They’re also not getting any younger. All the rest are trash teams that don’t know the meaning of the word “defense.” The ONLY team that really worries me is Chicago, which is a young team that plays hard and plays solid defense. They are the 2009 model of the 2008 Hawks.

One last time: The East is still the East.

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
4:03 pm

*25ppg for Granger

Ramon

June 10th, 2009
4:04 pm

Terrell, I think they would actually do it if they’re really trying to cut spending. And they still get an all start in return, and cap flexibility next season. If they were crazy enough to put in Chandler instead of Peja, then I could really smile for about 3 months straight. All would be missing is more shooters on the bench.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
4:08 pm

From DraftExpress.com. An assessment on the Hawks, and the upcoming draft:

NBA Team Needs: Southeastern Division

by: Kyle Nelson
June 9, 2009
Atlanta Hawks 47-35
Draft Picks #19 and #49

Draft History:
2008- None
2007- PF/C- Al Horford (#3), PG- Acie Law IV (#11)
2006- PF/C- Shelden Williams (#5), PF/C- Solomon Jones (#33),

Depth Chart:

PG: Mike Bibby*/ Speedy Claxton/ Acie Law IV
SG: Joe Johnson/ Ronald Murray*/ Mario West*/ Thomas Gardner*
SF: Josh Smith/ Maurice Evans
PF: Marvin Williams*/ Solomon Jones*/ Othello Hunter*
C: Al Horford/ Zaza Pachulia*/ Randolph Morris

After taking the Celtics to seven games during the 2007-2008 season, the Hawks returned in 2008-2009 and logged their most impressive season in years, cumulating with a second round sweep at the hands of the Cleveland Cavaliers. Thus, the season was bittersweet, one in which the Hawks showed their potential as one of the top teams in the NBA, but also their tremendous vulnerability. Despite possessing one of the most athletic starting lineups in the NBA, the Hawks had trouble replacing injured combo-forward Marvin Williams and finding players to step up when star Joe Johnson went cold. This team needs a second unit capable of stepping up in the clutch and helping to take some of the responsibility off its stars, but they also face plenty of uncertainty at the point guard position as well.

If this post-season proved anything, it was that the Hawks are a team on the cusp, missing a few essential components before they can consider themselves an elite team in the NBA. The most significant problem lies in the weakness of the bench. Any bench anchored solely by Flip Murray, Maurice Evans, and Zaza Pachulia is badly requiring an upgrade. While the Hawks could use reserves at every position, the shooting guard and small forward positions badly need an infusion of youth, talent, and versatility. Bringing Josh Childress back to Atlanta would be a very positive step in the right direction, while former draft pick David Andersen would also fit in very well with the team’s existing personnel. With Mike Bibby rumored to be looking for a long and very expensive contract now that he’s a free agent, the team will reportedly look in the direction of Ramon Sessions as a cheaper and younger option.

Since Acie Law failed to make the next step in the right direction, it makes sense for Atlanta to look at the depth of this year’s terrific point guard class and see if they can pluck a productive rotation player from this group. With how shallow their bench is, though, any player that unexpectedly falls out of the lottery should be considered regardless of position. The Hawks have a lot of different options in this draft, but have the potential to get better. While this draft might not put them over the top, the Hawks could get a solid role player to fortify their bench.

First Round Candidates: Ty Lawson, Eric Maynor, Jeff Teague, Earl Clark

tbhawksfan

June 10th, 2009
4:14 pm

When you think about what to do witht he off-season; think about the fact that slipping one spot in the play-off seeds probably gets us home after the first round.

Money has to be spent. No more unoaid contracts. No more “I’m going to take the first year to get to know the team” BS.

Put up or shut up.

glw

June 10th, 2009
4:29 pm

Ramon,

IM sure most anyone would trade for CP3, he is a special player, and I think New Orleans is looking to dump some salary, but CP3 is their one true drawing card. He is into New Orleans, what Lebron is to Clevaland. I am sure they would almost give away Chandler or Stojakovic if they could, but CP3 is untouchable.

Ramon

June 10th, 2009
4:38 pm

Glw, so if they were able to get a lower salary, with even more coming off the books (Speedy), and getting another all star back, I think they would have to consider it possibly. What does Sund have to lose by proposing it? lol.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
4:42 pm

A few comments about the ones made on Draftexpress:

1)Interesting that they mention Bibby and what they think his contract demands might be.

2)Also interesting that they mention Ramon Sessions by name.

3) I don’t see Childress coming back to Atlanta, at least not this year. Not only will the money be less than what he could’ve gotten last year (as far as I know, could be wrong), but he’s also not coming back to 30 mpg either. I could be wrong, though.

4)I think the comments about the bench are dead on. Just about all of them, in fact.

5)Interesting that it mentions how we “had trouble replacing injured combo forward Marvin Williams” and didn’t have guys to step up when Joe wasn’t doing so well. Those comments speak for themselves, despite those that still say otherwise.

6)I think the comments are the pg issue are dead on as well, even where Law is concerned. Time to move on with the youth infusion movement, but also time to be very careful about it. Don’t do too much youth, just for the sake of youth itself.

7) The comments on the draft are pretty solid, too, in my opinion. Anything falling out of the lottery should be considered. As for the rest of it, it’s a crapshoot, and I think everybody knows that. I’m more up for a guard than a forward, though…

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
4:54 pm

Ray, this is one of those examples where coach and GM need to be on the same page. What if Sund likes Sessions (i do), but Woody doesnt like him because last season he only shot 20% or so from the 3pt line. Then what? Does Sund still go after him?

chris

June 10th, 2009
5:00 pm

David Andersen is still out there and trade the 19 pick to Portland for all there round 2 picks
with the 33 pick we take Toney Douglas and with the 38 pick we take Jonas Jerebko and with the 48 pick we take Vyacheslav Kravtsov and trade AC Law to Detroit for there 35 pick and take Rodrigue Beaubois the kid can play people. Than we trade the 55 and 56 pick and Speedy to the Lakers for there 42 pick and we take Josh Heytvelt and now with Marvin Williams we trade and David Andersen and 2010 first round pick trade it to the Portland for Greg Oden.

glw

June 10th, 2009
5:02 pm

Ramon,

Sure, no harm in proposing it. just not much chance of it happening. I agree about them the Hornets, they put themselves in a bad position giving all that money to Stojakovic. I woudlnt mind trying to pry Chandler away from them by offering spare parts, but since we are capped out, we couldnt reallly offer much salary cap relief this year. I get the feeling they want instant relief.

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
5:14 pm

Ray, what if Sund likes Sessions, but Woody doesnt like him because last season he only shot 20% or so from the 3pt line. Then what?

Jack might be a better fit because he plays solid D, and he can hit the 3. (0.339% for Jack, 0.220% for Sessions), and Jack might cost less. I dont think Indianna will match an offer for Jack, but Milwaukee might match an offer for Sessions.

bigdave

June 10th, 2009
5:18 pm

LET BIBBY WALK…

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
5:19 pm

I wouldn’t be suprised to witness an Ando sighting on this blog hehehehehe…..

moboman

June 10th, 2009
5:27 pm

The Hawks had a better year because they brought in two guys that could SHOOT. Bringing back Chills and playing 4 against 5 on offense again next year wont do anything to help us. Package him for what ever you can get. If orlando has shown us anything, its that you have to have shooters. Chills is just a better Stacey Augmon.

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
5:31 pm

Ray,

The Ramon Sessions things set off my BS alarm like crazy. Whenever you see someone saying “reportedly” without citing who “reported,” it generally means they’re talking out of their butt and playing fantasy GM.

So I don’t find it the least bit interesting.

Melvin

June 10th, 2009
5:33 pm

Big Ray,

I have posted similiar thoughts to the Hawks as Kyle Nelson in previous blogs. I think if the Hawks could resign their top 4 FAs and bring over Chills and Andersen then I would be satisfied…. However, better acquisitions are welcome two…

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
5:42 pm

Childress WOULD improve our reboungingon both eds of th floor though. let’s not fogt about Danny Green and Robert Dozier in the second Round…..

Sekou, Just thinking about Ellington is tempting. Maybe we can draft him and teade Acie to whichever team drafts th PG that we want in the draft? Of corse we can add Morris and/or speedy to sweeten the deal….

Melvin

June 10th, 2009
5:45 pm

Chris,
So you want to improve our current weak bench with a bunch of 2nd rounders???

Nire,
Like you, I always consider the source(s) of reports….

Big Ray,
Out of the names listed in that article post. I would go with Earl Clark then Maynor….

Trent

June 10th, 2009
5:52 pm

The Hawks will be crazy to let Filp go to another team. tHEY NEED TO RESIGN

Trent

June 10th, 2009
5:55 pm

If you let Bibby and Flip go we are back at square one. I say let Bibby go and keep Flip Murray. We can not go young at the point position..

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
5:57 pm

O’brien,

I say hell yes, he does go after Sessions anyway, unless they can find a way to compromise on a good young pg who can meet our needs from elsewhere. Also, the money factor has to be considered. Woody might want Bibby, but if I’m Sund, how do you go to the ASG and convince them that they should continue to pay a lot for a guy on his downside, when you can get a much younger guy who might actually give you more, for a longer period of time?

I say that unless they’re convinced we can crack the top 3 and compete for a championship with Bibby, I’d let him go (we still don’t know his asking price, but it won’t be low, I’m sure) and go with the younger Jack or Sessions, who will also be most likely a GOOD bit cheaper, and still give you comparable or better stats. Even then, you can’t pin it all on stats, as a pg who has less of a need to score and can make more plays for others (this does not describe Bibby) will be what we need for our other guys to develop into more reliable scoring options.

What tends NOT to be lost on a lot of people is the simple fact that when Bibby arrived, he gave us something we hadn’t had in a while: a decent/good pg, and a deadly shooter (mostly when open…kinda like Kapono..hmmm). What DOES tend to be lost in the mix is the fact that while Horford’s scoring went up (something he did by himself), Josh and Marvin’s scoring went DOWN, and the fact is, both guys actually improved in their scoring skills. Josh shot a higher percentage from the field than he did in previous years, and Marvin added a three point shot. It’s not like they played less minutes. I’m just sayin’….

Okay, got off track. I’ll say this: Sund is the boss. Don’t ignore nice cheap, young assets (Sessions) that have already been given better opportunities and have shown an ability to blossom far more than your current assets (Law). Jack and Sessions will still get less money than Bibby, even if you cut his just-expired contract in half. And they will play for longer. Woody would have to have a VERY convincing plan to do otherwise, for me to ignore a guy like Sessions, if I’m Sund. I’m talking something that would involve promising 50-some odd wins and a 2nd round playoff victory.

Yeah, I know that sounds crazy. But this is the same guy who didn’t care too much for certain current all-star pgs. Pardon me if I don’t trust his opinion above all others.

J-Rock

June 10th, 2009
5:58 pm

Is Ellington better then Gardner? Is Lawson better then Law? Is there any wings or point guards in this year drafte that are better then Gardner and Acie? Woody just wont give these guys a chance to really show what they can do. I seen both players play in college in summer league and then glimps of them in games this season in last season. Gardner – Shooter..that was obvious in game 3 against cleveland. You dont score 40 points in college without being able to shhot and score. He has potential to be an impact player in the league, just needs an opportunity. He also can score, defend as he is a bigger wing at 6′5 225 and could play well in the Hawks system. (if he hawks really have one)
Law- have you seen any team keep him out the paint this year? this guy gets to any spot on the court that he wants. I agree that he may be turnover prone or lacks the court awareness of starting point guards in the league but this guy can really play and help win games for the Hawks. Mario West at point guard this season?? Are you serious? Acie can pass, great on ball defender and with time and reps will be able to control the game from the time he subs in until he goes back on the bench. I say these 2 guys can play big roles in hawks future.

KevinA

June 10th, 2009
6:28 pm

JJ, Al, Bibby and draft picks for Dwight Howard, Jamier Nelson and Anthony Johnson.

KevinA

June 10th, 2009
6:30 pm

Dwight and Josh are buddies. Resign ZaZa and Solo. Front court we can believe in.

Sautee

June 10th, 2009
6:49 pm

J-Rock,

I agree that Acie could help IF Woody will give him a chance.

But I’ll have to disagree when you say he’s turnover prone. In the 12 games where Acie got at least 15 minutes he scored 7.2 pts., grabbed 2.4 rebounds, and dealt 3.1 assists to .08 turnovers. That’s almost a 4:1 ratio which is top notch. 2:1 is considered good.

Ed

June 10th, 2009
6:53 pm

This is Ian Thomsen’s (Sports Illustrated)latest mock draft pick for the Hawks.

19 PG Jeff Teague Wake Forest Soph. 6-1 175
The Hawks will need to take a patient approach in developing Teague’s leadership and skills at point guard, but he has the athleticism and scoring instincts that will force defenses to respect him.

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
7:07 pm

Ray, Woody has been on record saying that Bibby should retire a Hawk, and how Bibby made his job so much easier, so I can imagine that Woody would be pushing hard to resign Bibby. (We’ve seen the look that Woody gives Acie when he misses a shot or has a turnover, although Flip/Bibby gets to do whatever they wants).

But there is no way I sign Bibby for 3 years, $21 mil, when I can get Jack or Sessions for 4 years, $23 mil.

Ramon

June 10th, 2009
7:09 pm

Ra’mon Sessions may end up being great. But I must ask what is the difference between he and Speedy (when Speedy signed)?

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
7:23 pm

Ramon, quick differences are:
1) Speedy was injury prone and 27, Sessions is only 23.
2) Speedy is 5-11, 170. Sessions is 6-3, 190.
3) Speedy was a backup (to CP3), Sessions is starter (Ridnour is backup).

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
8:05 pm

Lang Whitaker sees us Takig Patty Mills at no 19. I couldn’t Agree More

Link:

http://www.slamonline.com/online/blogs/the-links/2009/06/slamonline-mock-draft-patty-mills-no-19/

But We need to find a way to nab Ellington also……and Get danny green in the second Round. Injuries to the SG/SF positions will never be a problem again. Also this takes pressure off Joe with other playmakers around. Also, if he leakes in 2010, it won’t be too devestating. We also have to sign Gerald Green to sure up the end of the bench. Then re-sign flip. Trade Speedy, and trade the Chills Rights, Andersen Rights, and Ankyol Rights.

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
8:07 pm

Trade Morris too, and sign Solo/Zaza/Sheed

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
8:19 pm

Anthony Parker is an option as well.

Big Chris

June 10th, 2009
8:24 pm

Philedelphia didn’t steal Kapono from Toronto. Kapono is signed for 3 more years at over 6.5 million a season and played 15 mintues a game.

Kapono was thought to be considered even more untradeable than Marcus Banks. Kapono does bring an elite skill to the table, and Philedelphia gets some help.

Toronto fans are happy just to get out from under Kapono’s massive contract. Colangelo would have traded him for a stick of bubble gum.

Philly was the league worst 3pt shooting team last year. Toronto still has Calderon, Parker and Bargnani in the starting line-up launching 3’s at a great %.

Toronto didn’t need a 4th 3pt shooter, so they trade the guy who was the slowest, and worst defender of the group.

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
8:44 pm

Or we could take Ellington in round 1 and Tryrese Rice or the 6-2 Brazillian Guard in Round 2……

Jay

June 10th, 2009
8:45 pm

1) In professional sports, you play to win the game! Coach Woodson has led this team to more wins in each season of his five year tenure, including back-to-back playoff appearances. Like many who post on this blog, I have questioned his coaching “chops”. But he has over-achieved with the roster he’s been given each year. Whether you like it or not, Woodson’s not going anywhere anytime soon so you might as well learn to get used to it.

2) Winning 47 games and reaching the second round of the playoffs with an 8-man rotation when half of the 8 guys are under 25 years old is an impressive achievement (being swept by Cleveland when 3 of those 8 guys were hurt in no way detracts from that accomplishment). Having half your roster consist of players who are projects (Law, West, Gardner, Jones, Morris and Hunter) or haven’t played for 2 years because of injuries (Claxton) is more typical of a team that is rebuilding; not the approach of a team seriously competing for the championship.

3) Of the 8 Hawks who are free agents, Marvin Williams is the only one who must be re-signed; preferably to a long-term contract (about $7.5M/year). Despite the criticisms about where he was drafted and who should have been drafted instead, Williams is quietly becoming one of the better small forwards in the league; one whose continuing improvement directly mirrors that of the team.

4) Flip Murray could be re-signed (at about $2.5M/year) to play back-up shooting guard. However, a better option would be to use part of that money to sign Phoenix unrestricted free agent SF Matt Barnes to a 3-year, $4.5 million contract and let Maurice Evans play the back-up SG position. Barnes will bring solid defense, energy, toughness and a solid 3-point shooting touch to the team. Signing Barnes would allow Evans to move to his natural SG position where he would be a more effective defender and allow Coach Woodson to give more rest to Joe Johnson.

5) While it certainly wouldn’t hurt to re-sign Zaza Pachulia as a back-up center, you’ll probably have to spend about $5M per year to do so. Instead, why not sign Utah free agent center Jason Collins, who does the same things as Pachulia, for about $3M per year, and partner him with a PF who can score from the low post, such as Drew Gooden, for $2.5M per year. That’s about $5.5M for a solid, veteran center and PF–and that’s after giving each player a significant raise from last season’s salary–and less than what you would spend to re-sign Pachulia and Solomon Jones for the up-coming season.

6) Before last season started, I thought Philadelphia and Atlanta should have traded point guards. Now, Philadelphia and Atlanta should sign each other’s free agent PG. Mike Bibby is most effective in a half-court offense when he is free to shoot as a result of the passing by someone who can command a double-team on the low post and Philly wants to get better shooters (the reason they traded for Jason Kapono) around Elton Brand. Andre Miller is at his best in an up-tempo offense where his drives to the basket, for scoring and/or distributing, maximize the effectiveness of the other four starters. Since both are veterans with defensive liabilities, each team can expect an improvement on offense with no significant change on defense and the money needed to sign them would be similar.

7) Until or unless Acie Law develops into the type of PG that Woodson wants, securing the services of a veteran back-up PG must be top priority, even though it is rarely talked about as such. New Orleans’ Antonio Daniels is a veteran, a playmaker, has good size and is available because New Orleans wants to reduce payroll. In light of his previous success there, Speedy Claxton’s expiring contract should be enough to get the deal done.

8) There is no one the Hawks can draft at pick #19 who can lead the Hawks to a championship next season so they should draft someone they can groom to replace a key performer three or four years from now; after all, isn’t that what the draft is really all about.

9) Josh Childress is not coming back to Atlanta. He’ll make $10 million euros ($12.5 million US) a year for 2 years to play for a team whose style is conducive to his talents. Why would he give up at least $6 million US dollars a year just to come back to the Hawks? Would you?

10) I have two words for all of you who think that the Hawks need to trade either Josh Smith or Marvin Williams in order to make the team better–Stop it! Do you really know what you have in these three guys? I find it ironic that the arguments many of you present as justification for trading one guy rather than the other are the very reasons why you need to keep all of them. You trade guys when their skill-sets are identical to one another and you keep guys when their skill-sets are complementary to one another. They are only 23 years old! If at all possible, these guys need to be kept together for at least the next 7-10 years because they are three-fourths of the team’s core!

11) With a salary allocation similar to the 2008-2009 season, the Hawks will have a far better chance of legitimately competing for a championship if next season’s roster has Horford, Smith and Williams in the frontcourt with Johnson and Miller in the backcourt with veterans like C-Collins, PF-Gooden, SF-Barnes, SG-Evans, and PG-Daniels on the bench with Morris, Law, your first-round draft choice and a re-signed Hunter and either West or Gardner as projects.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
8:49 pm

How can Kyle Nelson do an assessment of the Hawks upcoming draft, when he cant even get the players positions right?

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
8:49 pm

Terrell, I did not watch any Wake Forest games last season so I have no opinion of Teague. Did he play off the ball? That’s what we need (IMO). A guy who is more used to playing off the ball than having it in his hands and being “the man”. That’s why I thought about Douglas, because I seem to recall that he was effective off the ball. One would think that finding a combo guard late in the first round should be fairly easy. I think the challenging part is someone who can bury the open jumper AND defend. What we DON’T want is a Lou Williams type who can only score by attacking the basket, that won’t work with this squad.

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
9:00 pm

Please just say no to Matt Barnes. The guy is a chucker and eevey time is saw him play this season he brickes A TON of threes….not that great defensively either. I’d rather take Grant Hill.

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
9:02 pm

AJ, come on now……Sweet Lou is a good spot up shooter. He just needs to learn to balance himself off the dribble.

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
9:08 pm

Paul Westphal is the new Kings coach. I look forward to seeing their offense next season (although it probably wont transfer into wins). I know we have some Paul Westphal fans on here. He is one of the guys I would have loved to see Woody bring in as an assistant.

Jay, I am a fan of Matt Barnes as well. Another backup PF option is Anotnio McDyess. I also like Charlie V, because he can play backup PF and backup SF.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
9:08 pm

Suppose we draft a combo guard like Douglass, who fits Woody’s so called system, let Acie Law go elsewhere, the Hawks stink it up, and Woody gets fired. Then what? Back to square one. The only way I go with Douglass is if Sund thinks Woody is the man that can take this team to the next level. If he’s uncertain about Woody’s future, we better go ahead and get our TRUE pg of the future.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
9:12 pm

O’brien,

Believe me, I feel you on that. But as you say, I’m not up to paying Bibby that kind of money (or more, which is what I think he’ll want). I know he makes Woody more comfortable, and I can’t blame any coach for that. But money talks, and so does production. I, too would rather have Jack or Sessions for the money (and for more years).

Astro Joe,

Excellent point about the challenge of finding a point guard (or lead guard, if you prefer) who can both defend AND hit that open shot. You’re right, this is no cake walk. But it can be done. Here’s to hoping Sund gets it done.

Niremetal,

I’d check the batteries in that BS alarm. I’m just sayin’….

Ariose

June 10th, 2009
9:14 pm

Other than his speed and owning of the Redeem Team in Bejing, the hawks should consider the fact that they will get a whole new country as a revenue stream if the get Mills – He is by far the most loved player in Australia and it is pretty much an un(der)tapped NBA market.

Just a thought.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
9:15 pm

O’brien,

I don’t see Woody bringing in an assistant like that. Westphal is a former head coach, is he not? That makes him a “threat” if you know what I mean. Perhaps I’m pegging Woody the wrong way about this, but something tells me he would not particularly care for any former head coaches on his staff unless they were well and truly done with the idea of a being a head coach (as in, they plan to retire within the next year or two). Again, I could be way off base, but that’s my outside, uneducated point of view.

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
9:17 pm

What in the hell did I just say? lol!

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
9:20 pm

Ray,

Just name me the last time a tip on the Hawks’ front office posted by someone other than Sekou turned out to be remotely close to accurate? And this guy couldn’t even get Marvin and Josh’s positions right. Also, two years ago, he said we’d be pursuing Pau Gasol and Monta Ellis.

I’m just sayin’ ;)

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
9:22 pm

Jay, 6 million$ is not worth your life. It’s some damn fools over there. They were throwing flares for crying out loud. Coulda set that fro on fire or something.

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
9:33 pm

Niremetal,

I have no problems with you discrediting the article or its author. As for my opinion on your BS alarm, I’ll stick with that opinion. No offense meant by it….just…an opinion.

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
9:34 pm

Terrell, sorry, I just don’t see the Hawks finding a “PG of the future” by choosing the 6th or 7th best one in the draft. Here’s my thought, trade #19 and our second round pick to the T’Wolves for their $28 first round pick and both of their second round picks. Sund could then choose Douglas at 28 and choose either some Europeans that he can keep overseas or someome like Aminu or Derrick Brown as projects to developinto rotational players. When I read the DraftExpress write-up for Douglas, he just seems ideal for our team. And I can’t wait to pick up his brother in Fantasy Football next season.

chris

June 10th, 2009
9:36 pm

Trade Marvin Williams and David Andersen and a 2010 first round pick to Portland for Greg Oden

Astro Joe

June 10th, 2009
9:42 pm

chris

June 10th, 2009
9:45 pm

Trade AC Law and Marvin Williams and David Andersen and a 2010 first round pick to the Sun for AS

Big Ray

June 10th, 2009
9:45 pm

Niremetal,

Couldn’t resist a return shot or two.

“Just name me the last time a tip on the Hawks’ front office posted by someone other than Sekou turned out to be remotely close to accurate? And this guy couldn’t even get Marvin and Josh’s positions right. Also, two years ago, he said we’d be pursuing Pau Gasol and Monta Ellis.”

1. It was reported (not by Sekou) that Billy Knight was going to take Sheldon Williams at #5. I don’t recall who reported that. There were so many….

2. Last I looked, the author of that article wasn’t the ONLY one who can’t seem to get Josh and Marvin’s positions right…according to half the blog, Josh can’t either…

3. Okay, so he said we’d be pursuing Gasol and Ellis. Correct me if I’m wrong, but PURSUING and CATCHING/ACQUIRING aren’t the same word are they? Didn’t think so. Wanna hear some REALLY good ones?

a) “Anna Nicole Smith married for love”

b) “Iraq is slap-full of WMDs”

c) “Wesley Snipes always pays his taxes”

d) “Re-signing the Joshes is our absolute, number one priority of the summer”

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
9:49 pm

What about trading for Sergio Rodriguez? Portland has a log jam at pg, now that they’ve excersized the option on Blake.

chris

June 10th, 2009
9:50 pm

or you trade AC Law and first round pick for Jonny Flynn

terrell barron

June 10th, 2009
9:52 pm

Astro, what makes you think they’ll end up with the 6th or 7th best pg in the draft? Your’re basing that statement on projections, which can be thrown out the window where the NBA is concerned. Most of you guys want Sessions or Jack. I wonder where they were ranked when they came out?

chris

June 10th, 2009
9:55 pm

The Hawks need a Center big time get Greg Oden or Roy Hibbert and all would be good

O'brien

June 10th, 2009
9:56 pm

Astro Joe, I am not a fan of stashing players overseas. It works for the Spurs, but the Hawks still have David Andersen and Cenk Ayol overseas. 2 wasted picks so far.

chris

June 10th, 2009
10:02 pm

Hawks all you got to do is draft Toney Douglas with the first pick and Jonas Jerebko in round 2

niremetal

June 10th, 2009
10:03 pm

Ray,

All I’m saying is look at the guy’s track record over the last 3-4 years for all his posts. His projections about who teams will pursue are almost always way off base. That’s not surprising – this is a DRAFT website, not a general NBA transactions website. The Gasol/Ellis was just one example. If that were the only things that didn’t happen, it would be one thing. But Nelson has a proven track record of BS.

Also, my general point stands. Guys who say “reportedly” without citing a source are bound to set off BS alarms. “Reported” indicates that some other news source has actually discussed this before. That begs the question – who reported it? The truth of course is no one. I bet you could scour Google for hours and not find a single source outside of fan blogs (and pseudo-news sources like Hoopsword) that say we’re looking at Sessions.

I’m not saying that we’re NOT pursuing Sessions. Indeed, I would be surprised if Sund wasn’t looking it him. It just makes sense that he would. But that doesn’t mean that Nelson is talking out of his a$$ when he says that the Hawks “reportedly are” looking at him.

Phillip

June 11th, 2009
12:12 am

I think the Hawks need to grab Craig Heinrich – everybody knows that the Atlanta Hawks need some “Vanilla Thunder” :)

Sam Wetherson

June 11th, 2009
12:15 am

Sekou you seem to have some kind of problem with Marvin Williams. I have noticed in your blogs you kind don’t even acknowledge the kid at all. Like this one you don’t even mention him at all and talk alot about Childress who already stated that he wasn’t coming back. Every blog we have to ask you about him because you don’t even mention him. You have mention a few times that you love the combo of Horf and Smith at the forward spots and that we should get a center. MArvin is a far better basketball play than Smoove imo but I guess the home town boy gets all the love despite his obvious shortcomings.

Ed

June 11th, 2009
12:50 am

Here’s Sekou’s latest draft published today

Sekou Smith
06/10/2009
Blake Griffin
Hasheem Thabeet
James Harden
Ricky Rubio
Jordan Hill
Jrue Holiday
Stephen Curry
DeMar DeRozan
Tyreke Evans
Jonny Flynn
DeJuan Blair
Earl Clark
Brandon Jennings
James Johnson
Terrence Williams
Gerald Henderson
B.J. Mullens
Ty Lawson
Wayne Ellington
Tyler Hansbrough
Eric Maynor
Austin Daye
Chase Budinger
Gani Lawal
Jeff Teague
Darren Collison
Toney Douglas
DaJuan Summers
Sam Young
Marcus Thornton

Ed

June 11th, 2009
12:51 am

Wayne Ellington is the Hawks pick as the numbers didn’t show up.

Ken Strickland

June 11th, 2009
1:23 am

It wouldn’t surprise me one bit to see the Hawks pass on drafting a PG. As Sekou mentioned, and I’ve mentioned before, their’s no reason to believe the PG’s in this yrs draft are potentially any better than Acie, especially any that would be available when we draft. Why waste a 1st rd pick on a PG unless their’s some certainty he’ll get better treatment, and/or a better opportunity to succeed than Acie’s gotten.

We’d better go all out to resign Zaza, because failing to do so would leave us with RMorris as our only viable option at C off the bench. It’s a virtually a given that Solo will leave.

Mic

June 11th, 2009
1:34 am

If the Hawks are to keep their core, they definitely need a scoring point guard preferably a vet.. My suggestion is Stephon Marbury. I do believe that we will be able to obtain him rather cheaply and he still has plenty left in his game. Furthermore he will take the ball out of Josh Smith’s hands and run the offense that we rarely see; to freeing Joe Johnson of point duties!

Clyde

June 11th, 2009
4:15 am

I say Joe for the #1 or #2 pick and lets draft Thabet. Sign Marvin, Flip, Chills, Solo, and Sheed. Draft Wayne Ellington with the 19.

pg-flip
sg-marvin
sg-chills
pf-jsmoove
c-Sheed

pg-Acie
sg-Ellington
sf-evans
pf-Solo
c-Thabet

chris

June 11th, 2009
7:24 am

we need a CENTER people all this talk about a PG we have 5 of them ,AC LAW , Bibby , Flip ,
Speedy , West now the last thing we need is a PG who will siting on the bench

chris

June 11th, 2009
7:31 am

We need Greg Oden or Roy Hibbert Trade Marvin Williams and AC Law for one of theme

chris

June 11th, 2009
7:37 am

Toney Douglas and Jonas Jerebko in the Draft we get theme and we will be in the Playoff next year

Sekou Smith

June 11th, 2009
7:42 am

Jay raises some interesting points in his 8:45 post from last night.

Patty Mills at 19? I could live with that. All these point guards in the draft bring a little something different to the table. That’s the real dilemma for any team evaluating them all. Each one has something unique about his game that the others don’t necessarily have. Mills, Teague, Lawson and Maynor are all vastly different players. Any of the four would be a quality pickup at 19. I’m just not convinced the Hawks are going point guard there (at least not as convinced as I was two weeks ago).

The Hawks are going best player available at 19. They won’t be locked in to a certain position. It doesn’t make sense when you have as many needs as they do and you can’t address them until after the draft.

And while the Hawks haven’t conducted any workouts here in Atlanta since before the Chicago pre-draft camp (Terrence Williams headlined a group of about five guys who came in for a one-day shot roughly two weeks ago that was not open to the media), the player parade is expected to heat up next week and leading up to the draft.

The Hawks have spanned the globe for group and other workouts, including the Reebok Eurocamp in Treviso, where Mills lit up the floor in the All-Star game. So expect things to get really interesting in the next 10 days or so on the workout front.

chris

June 11th, 2009
7:45 am

Trade AC Law for Rodrigue Beaubois the kid can play people. Trade David Anderson for Vyacheslav Kravtsov and Draft Toney Douglas and Jonas Jerebko

A Tribe Called Quest

June 11th, 2009
8:03 am

Why the hell are we going for best player available? That is so stupid–we need a PG or center–not another talented SF

My god

Clyde

June 11th, 2009
8:54 am

We need a center not a pf who can’t play center. We need a center not point guard who won’t play because our coach is stuck on his own stupidity. We need a center so lets make the trade for the #2 and get Thabet. He will give us the shot blocker we need in the middle since Horford can’t.

Some of yall need to wake up. We have ignored our frontline for 5 years now and we paid the price for it against Cleveland.

Childress to stay in Greece

June 11th, 2009
9:25 am

[...] Three different sources I’ve spoken to in recent days insist that they don’t expect Josh Childress to return to the NBA this summer (he has until July 15 to opt out of his Greek contract or remain there for another season). The dynamics of his situation in the NBA haven’t changed from last summer. He’s still a restricted free agent and would be subject to dealing with a Hawks organization that couldn’t get a deal done with him last summer. So it was a serious miscalculation of mine to blindly assume he’d bolt Europe for the comfort of the states. Will the Hawks do the right things this summer? | Hawks Blog [...]

eddie

June 11th, 2009
9:27 am

let it rest about chris paul. we didn’t draft him. we know!!!!!! it’s over. let it go.

Halsey

June 11th, 2009
10:13 am

The thing the Hawks need to be concentrating on most, if they stay at pick 19, is just to find a guy who can stick around and contribute for a long time. It’s nice to address needs, but by pick 19 there are no guarentees that a guy who supposedly fills a need will be a quality NBA contributor. Acie Law supposedly filled a need. Basically the Hawks should take the best prospect regardless of position at 19.

The best thing they could do however, is try and trade for Chris Kaman. He would give the Hawks a solid, long term 7 footer.

cdog

June 11th, 2009
10:35 am

i don’t see any value with pachulia. you can draft a bj mullens and get more out of him than you do out of pachulia. resign childress and bibby.

Khao$

June 11th, 2009
10:44 am

Judging from Rick Sund’s history of drafting foreign players (actually drafting period), I’m not holding my breath for any major moves. Honestly, Sunds trackrecord isn’t that impressinve IMHO.

Volman

June 11th, 2009
11:10 am

I honestly don’t think the Hawks will go PG in the draft, but if they do it will be Mills.

I remember seeing J. Jack at at LEAST two of the home playoff games this season (and he went to Georgia Tech) so I bet you he felt how awesome of an atmosphere it was at the Highlight Factory. I think he’d love to play in Atlanta. I’d take Jack if I were looking at FA for a point guard. I love his toughness and ability to score.

Anyway, my two cents. I’m glad I’m not Rick Sund…because it seems like no matter what he’s going to do next, this entire blog is going to not be satisfied!

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
11:49 am

Clyde, where is Horford in your lineup?

HawkKingBibby

June 11th, 2009
12:32 pm

SEKOU, Come on man tell us who your FILL IN THE BLANK POINT GUARD IS. Ford? Felton? Also if we stay at 19 I got 3 words for Hawks fans: DERRICK BROWN BABY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

niremetal

June 11th, 2009
12:34 pm

Terrell,

Clyde thinks Horford traded for a bag of chips. I guess he figures that we need the bag of chips more than Horford so that Thabeet can put on some weight once he gets here.

Andy G

June 11th, 2009
12:39 pm

How about Ty Lawson? We need a point guard, and it’s not like Bibby ever drove to the hole or guarded anyone on D. But then again, Woodson sucks at developing young talent. He never plays the young guys until the last two minutes of the game (except when they are injuries). I say keep Zaza, sign and trade the others for Ellington and Lawson. A shooter and a real point guard will solve some troubles. Maybe even a Jarret Jack kind of guy too to shield Lawson from covering a big guard. I liked the work Sund did last year, but those were stop gap moves to cover the glaring weaknesses. We need a long term solution this year, not that anything is long term in the NBA (except the Speedy deal, holy crap it seems like we have had him doing nothing 4 EVER!!).

supa

June 11th, 2009
12:42 pm

The Hawks must draft Ty Lawson. He’s too driven not to succeed. Plus, he’s a wonderful character-type guy and a great leader. He’ll be the face of the franchise in a few years. I truly believe that.

Roy Williams basically handed him the team, and he was the team leader (not Hansbrough).

I met him at the team hotel at the Regionals in Memphis. Most of the top players ignored the fans, but Ty stopped and talked to everyone and signed as many autographs as he could. Because he was running late, he couldn’t give everyone an autograph, but he promised he’d come back after practice if they met him there. And sure enough, he was there when he said he would be.

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
12:45 pm

The Hawks are going to take Chase Budinger for the simple fact that he can play both WING positions, and he can knock down 3 pointers. I can feel it. I hope not, but it’s going to happen.

Andy G

June 11th, 2009
12:45 pm

Toney Douglas could help, too. Great true scorer, think Flip Murray, but better. Let’s not waste time on some pick that has potential that Woodson cannot develop.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 11th, 2009
12:49 pm

Chillz stay’n in Greece and ZAZA is probably going to bolt…… Okay resign Marvin/Flip ASAP Sign -Jarret Jack- I’ve had enuff of the Mike bibby show.
Draft-Toney Douglas or Wayne Ellington in the first- 2 capable scorers……..
2nd round- Garret Siller-6′11 305 – Sum serious beef to protect the paint… He’s got to better than Solo and R. Morris

If we have the cap space sign the “Birdman” for energy off the bench

Terrell-Sergio Rodriguez is playing in Nrew york these days

Chris -Ac and a future first sounds good if we are gauranteed a shot at drafting Flynn- Lets be for real tho -no way in hell we get Oden for Ac and a pick…. Maybe Pryzbilla

Tribe CQ -u killn me man African American studies….lol _Yeah lets get prepared for a summer of useless information………..

” Acie is the Rocky moutain Revue MVP” who the hell cares
“Josh has morphed in a Yung reggie miller- Smoove for threeeee”

Cdog- ZAZA is one of the better backup centers in the league- He does alot of the dirty work /offensive rebounding and headd butting lol- the man wont wow u with his offense or anything but he is an effective backup or starter if need be

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 11th, 2009
12:53 pm

Terrel whats wrong with C.Budinger-he’s athletic -can get his own shot and has a stroke from deep, Who would u pick at 19 if all the good PG’s are gone……
Please dont tell me BJ Mullens-I saw a cupl OSU games this past season and I was like ahhhhm thats him -whats all the hype about -the man dissapears alot -I didnt even know he was in the game half of the tim

Ken Strickland

June 11th, 2009
12:53 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT- After reviewing Sekou’s mock draft, an idea came to me about why we might take a PG. Knowing Woodson’s disdane for young PG’s, suppose Sund drafts one, with the idea he’s going to give him one last chance to actually commit the time and effort to develop this PG, or he’s outa here.

If Woodson is successful, he stays and our PG problems are solved. If he’s unsuccessful, he’s sent packing and the new HC will have a PG of the future to work with.

I question whether we need a center as much as some of you might think. We managed to win 47 gms and advance to the 2nd rd of the playoffs with Horford as our center. Keep in mind he also missed a portion of the season due to injuries, and played injured for a portion of the season and the playoffs. What we need more than a center is a change of philosophy that would allow us to play an uptempo OFF and utilize our speed, quickness and athleticism to our maximum advantage.

The top teams know how to utilize their strengths to minimize their weaknesses, and all teams have weaknesses. Instead of us always being reactive, and trying to match other teams, we should be proactive and utilize our aforementioned strengths to force teams to try matching us.

We need an athletic PG that can shoot, play DEF and has the ability to breakdown DEF’s with his penetration. We also need another shooter and a stronger bench. Some of you are hung up on the idea of us needing a 7′ center to improve or get to the next level. For those of you that insist on believing that, please explain how the Hawks, with a PF(Horford) playing center, managed to finish ahead of every Eastern conference team except the Cavaliers, Celtics and Magic. And if you’ll check, you’ll find that most of the teams that finished below the Hawks have starting centers that are 6′11′ and above. While a big starting center would be a welcomed addition, it’s not a necessity for us. Afer all, the Piston’s haven’t done too badly using ao called natural PF’s at center(RWallace & AMcDyess).

RealSquawk

June 11th, 2009
12:53 pm

Questions for the bloggers.

What is the worst case scenario for the Hawks this offseason?

and

What is the best case scenario?

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
1:10 pm

Imus, I never said I didn’t like Budinger. He’s alright. But I’d rather have Maynor, Teague, Mills, Lawson, Flynn, Evans, Ellington, or even Earl Clark. Budinger is a poor man’s Marvin Williams, why should we go that route? Now if we plan on doing a sign and trade for Marvin, then I’d be o.k with the pick.

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
1:12 pm

And Imus, no way all of the good pg’s will be gone when we pick. This draft is loaded with potential at the pg and combo guard position.

Kenbud

June 11th, 2009
1:16 pm

Why can’t the Hawks make a big splash and get that #2 pick? ….. It’s a guard’s league now, and Ricky Rubio is the next great one. If you haven’t watched him play, then you are missing something. The Hawks have trade bait with Josh Smith (not a fan), expiring contract and a mix of future drafts picks. Rubio will set this city on fire.

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
1:16 pm

Ken, how do we know Sund even has the authority to say “you’re outta here”? B.K. said it, but the idiot is still here.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 11th, 2009
1:54 pm

Terrel- So you Chase hate’n huh? LoL -we need depth at SF thats why I mentioned him- So you want to draft a Pg -thats going to need time to develope – Lets not go down that road again- The only Pgs I see starting quickly next year are Flynn/Rubio the rest are good but wont be ready for a while.

It really comes down to how long we havre to deal with woody-i just dont want to draft players that will never see the court….IE AC Law

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 11th, 2009
2:00 pm

Come on Kenbud…. -trade Josh Smith for an unproven player……. Wow- Our best playoff performer for an unproven Euro. I get frustrated with that yung’n alot but i wouldnt do that trade.

Terrell im going to shoot Sund an E-mail to let him know you wont be happy with any selection other than PG and see what he thinks……HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH LOL

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
3:11 pm

How bout this Clyde?
Marvin, Chills rights, Speedy’s contract and #19 to Memphis for Rudy Gay and #2?
Bibby/Law
JJ/Flip
Gay/Evans
Smith/Pendegraph(2nd rdr)
Horford/Thabeet(#2)

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
3:18 pm

Imus, Teague and Evans are combo guards, Ellington is a sg, and Earl Clark is a sf/pf, so why would you tell Sund a big ole lie?

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
3:22 pm

What would it take to pry Prizbillia away from Portland? Would a sign and trade for Marvin get it done?

Sekou Smith

June 11th, 2009
3:37 pm

My bad HawkKing, I didn’t realize you really expected me to answer that. :)

cp

June 11th, 2009
3:37 pm

From reading the report on Mills he was getting his shot blocked a lot by other guards. They think his size might be a problem. If we cant get Flynn or Teague I would probably stay away from a pg in the first round. Terrance Williams, Earl Clark, Sam Young, and the kid from Xavier could help this team. In the second round I like the guard from Miami who won the 3 pt shooting contest in college.

chris

June 11th, 2009
3:53 pm

Trade Marvin and Chills rights and David Andersen rights to Portland for Greg Oden

UGA

June 11th, 2009
4:01 pm

We need to be realistic, keeping Marvin is a must. We are not going to get a better 3 than him (of what may be available and affordable).

How much better did he get since his rookie year? Woodson told him to develop his 3-point shot, and he hit some big ones this year.

Hawks need to re-sign the other 3 free agents. Other teams in the Eastern Conference have better players than the Hawks, but the Hawks some how seemed to play well together and knew how to win especially at home.

IF we can somehow sign all of our FA’s, I’d suggest to sign a Jack/Felton to back up Bibby and a scoring PF (CharlieV/Drew Gooden/McDyess) and we’d be OK.

Ariose

June 11th, 2009
4:08 pm

Or problem is Commmitment. O.K So we stick with Acie. Draft Ellington in the 1st rd. Danny Green in the second and sign Gerald Green. We now have a Legit bench Full of SG/SF who can come in if Marvin and/or Joe get injured. They were run into the ground this past season…..if it happens again Marvins back may be in a lot more pain that it’s currnetly in.

Then you re-sign Marvin/Flip/Zaza/ Solo and Sign Sheed…….No Bibby….Like Ray said, Woodson needs to be taken away from his crutch in order to Play the younger guys.

Ariose

June 11th, 2009
4:12 pm

CP, (Flynn,Lawson,Mills,Rice) all are 6′0 and all will get their shots blocked a few times. If Mills is getting it blocked, at least you know he’s in attack mode. If you watched him play in College or you saw him in the Olympics you’d know that it won’t be a problem.

If you want to go Bigger, There is 6′2 A.J Price in the second Round out of UCONN. Or that Hyper-athletic 6′2 Brazillian point guard guard…

Ariose

June 11th, 2009
4:14 pm

Or 6′3 PG Lester Hudson out of Tennesse-Martin (27ppg)

UGA

June 11th, 2009
4:22 pm

Hawks are not getting Rasheed Wallace. He and Josh Smith together would be a disaster with the crying and bad attitudes.

Ariose

June 11th, 2009
4:37 pm

People thought Artest would be a cancer for the Rockets but it turned out just fine. You won’t know until you try. Smoove only had 3 thechs on the year….that’s hardly a complainer. I think he knows when enough is enough….unlike sheed maybe. But I will say hat Sheed is USUALLY right when he whines enough to warrant a tech…..

Ken Strickland

June 11th, 2009
4:39 pm

TERRELL BARRON-that’s a good question. However, I don’t think Sund would have taken the job if he hadn’t been assured that their treatment of former GM BKnight was a one time thing. I find it hard to believe Sund was so desperate for a GM job that he would have accepted the SAASG’s job offer if he thought they would treat him the way former GM was mistreated.

LouHudson

June 11th, 2009
4:50 pm

Chris and Terrel, you both some nice ideas, but Greg Olden has not shown anything yet and is injury prone. IE – Sam Bowie and he is no where near the player Bowie was when healthy. Bowie was a 20/10 player before he broke bones in his leg. Again Kaman or Pryzbilla offer most realistic options for the 5 spot. No one is going to trade the # 2 pick for what the Hawks would offer.
A decision is going have to be made concerning Josh S. , Marvin, and Horford. Who’s the 4 and 3 and then move the odd man. Don’t resign Bibby and package Speedy(contract) and 19th for someting! With say Marvin’s sign and trade and Bibby’ money sign your top FAs. Period.

chris

June 11th, 2009
5:00 pm

Trade AC Law to the Detroit for there 2 round pick the 33 pick in the draft and tack Jonas Jerebko

jhan

June 11th, 2009
5:03 pm

If we sign a starting center then:

1 – Marvin or Josh must be moved
2 – Al goes to the bench

I like Astro’s idea of signing a big man to come off the bench. He can rotate with ZaZa to relieve Josh & Al.

Astro – you wrote on a previous blog that Woody would be criticized for playing people 38+ minutes in an overtime game. JJ would feel like he was rooming with Acie in the doghouse if he only played 38 minutes in a game – let alone an overtime game! LOL

chris

June 11th, 2009
5:06 pm

We need a Center people not a PG Bibby will be back look Greg Oden is going to be one of the best player in 2010

chris

June 11th, 2009
5:13 pm

Trade AC Law, David Andersen, Speedy, Marvin to the Sun for AS

glw

June 11th, 2009
5:20 pm

Chris,

you should give it up, Portland is not trading Oden. I think you are right about Oden, he is going to be a beast by 2010, and that is precisely why Portland would never trade him. And Phoenix isnt giving you Amare without either Josh or Horford being in that deal.

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
5:46 pm

Now this is what im talking about the cavs, management are thinking about letting mike brown go the coach of the year, the coach who took them to eastern conf. finals and they still talking about firing him now us ASG is hoping that mike woodson succed a coach who have no offense philosophy a coach who cant win on the road a coach who have never devolop his bench and the list goes on i want avery johnson to be our coach but ASG will always try to be cheap.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
5:47 pm

Lou Hudson, Oden? I never mentioned Oden Thats ludicrous. Portland has one of the best GM’s in the league. Why in the world would he get rid of a franchise center? I say we go after Priz.

terrell barron

June 11th, 2009
5:50 pm

Starks, that’s because Cleveland is trying to win a Championship, and not to mention, they’ll do anything possible to keep LJ. We’re just happy to make the Playoffs.

Ariose

June 11th, 2009
5:50 pm

Jhan, it’s easy, Al goes to the bench. Whats the problem? He’s STILL going to gt 28+ minutes a game, and hus post moves are still very mechanical….

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
5:55 pm

What are we going to do this season only time will tell.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
5:57 pm

T.B i agree with you 100percent.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

chris

June 11th, 2009
6:00 pm

Then go get Roy Hibbert if you can’t not get Greg Oden

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
6:03 pm

T.B i go to just about all the games and sometime i shake my head and say what in the H is woody doing.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
6:08 pm

AROISE every body love al i do to but this off season he better get his a$$ on the blocks and learn some post move just like you say he is to mechanical i want to see some improvement from him this year.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

cp

June 11th, 2009
6:11 pm

Roy Hibbert? Hell you might as well keep Horford as the starting center over Hibbert. Hibbert is a big body and that’s about it. He does not rebound well nor does he block shots well and he is very slow. The Blazers will not trade Priz because Oden is injury prone and he is the primary backup for Oden. Frye is available. He can shoot so he would be able to spread the floor.

Ariose trust me I feel you. I was just going by that report I read. They said it was guards who were blocking Mills that’s why they have a concern for his height. I have not seen a lot of the kid only videos and looked at scouting reports. The guard in the draft that is the type of pg Woodson love is Curry. He can shoot and since Joe is the primary ball handler he can just sit around and shoot jumpers all day. The problem is he will be gone early in the draft. But he seems to be the type of pg that Woodson loves.

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
6:29 pm

I still say trade marvin big al and the 19pick for bosh only if chill come back so he can started at the 3position i like chill better than marvin at the 3.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Hoops

June 11th, 2009
6:34 pm

Here’s my Hawks Off Season Plan:
1. Improve draft position by offering Acie and #19 pick. Add Evans to that offer if needed to be able to get Curry. He will be the superstar out of this draft! This costs us no additional money. If we loose JJ next summer, Curry will be ready to step in @ the 2 position and score.

2. Sign Sessions. I think you can get him for 5M. Let Bibby walk.

3. Here’s the big deal-offer Josh S. and Speedy for Bosh. I think Toronto will go for this deal because they know they will loose Bosh next summer anyway. Why not get Josh and Speedy’s expiring contract? It’s good for the Hawks because Bosh has an expiring contract next summer as does JJ. That’s over 30M available to use to resign them or other FA’s next summer. If the Hawks make a championship run in “09-’10 with Bosh, he and JJ will be very interested in staying with the Hawks!

4. Sign Charlie V.

5. Resign Marvin, Flip and Zaza.

This is your line up for the same money that you are spending now:

PG-Sessions, Flip
SG-JJ, Curry
SF-Marvin, Evans(if not traded)
PF-Horford, Charlie V.
C-Bosh, Zaza, Morris

That team my friends, can compete for the Championship!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 11th, 2009
6:38 pm

I wonder when Joe’s gonna step up and decide to actually be a leader for once. WIll anyone decide to be the leader of this team?

If anyone saw Kobe: Doin’ Work, regardless of how much you like or dislike him, you saw him leading his team in the huddle. Why is Joe so “laid-back” that he can’t freaking help guys out?

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
6:49 pm

My 1st team for the hawks.
STARTERS ACIE, JOE, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD,
BENCH FLIP, MOE, CHILL, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE 19PICK TY LAW, SOLO.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
6:52 pm

My 2nd team for the hawks.
STARTERS ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH,
BENCH FLIP, MOE, HAKIM WARRICK, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE WEST, SOLO.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Seattle

June 11th, 2009
7:03 pm

What could we package with Marvin and the 19th pick to land Amare from the Suns?

Astro Joe

June 11th, 2009
7:21 pm

jhan, true.

No thanks on Patty Mills. Some of you all may not have noticed but this team really isn’t built for speed. We don’t rebound the ball well enough to play at the pace where Mills would be most effective. If Sund drafts Mills, then he better address our rebounding situation. Running fast breaks is less about the speed of players sprinting up the floor and more about defensive field-goal percentage and defensive rebounding.

Oh and don’t be surprised when Robert Swift is one of the first free agents signed by Sund.

glw

June 11th, 2009
7:24 pm

Hoops,

I like your proposed team and wish it could come to past, but Curry is a Top 5 Pick and no team is going to trade down for Acie Law and the 19th pick and even if u threw in Mo Evans still wouldnt be enough. And your No.2 conflicts wtih your No. 4, I dont think we have cap space to sign both Sessions and Villanueva, and even if we did, both are restricted and Milwaukee isnt going to let both of them walk.

darrel starks,

you got a pretty good squad too there, but you know woody would #@$@ bricks before he started Acie. But I do think Acie deserves a shot.

UGABAN1111

June 11th, 2009
7:48 pm

Y DOES EVERYBODY THINK BOSH IS A CENTER, HE IS NOT A CENTER!! A Y DOES EVERYBODY KEEP SAYING WE NEED A PG OF THE FUTURE. UM IF IM RITE THE LAKERS ARE IN THE FINALS WITH ONE OF THE OLDEST PG’S IN THE NBA.

1. We NEED TO TRADE FOR A STARTING CENTER. Przy or Caman or Thabeet somehow.
2. Keep Bibby, Marvin, We dnt need chills we need to include him in a trade. keep zaza but dont play him that many minutes because he has no offense but great in rebounding.
3. We need another superstar!! Nobody has won a champioinship with one superstar!!
Heat – wade, shaq
Spurs – duncan, parker, ginobli
Celtics – big 3
Pistons – Sheed (he was a superstar back then to me), billups

O'brien

June 11th, 2009
8:38 pm

My offseason plan for the Hawks. Sign Jarrett Jack to be our starting PG. Then sign Villanueva to be our backup PF, and resign Chills. If Chills stays in Greece, Villanueva can play some backup minutes at SF too, and resign Flip and Zaza. (Chills might not come back, but Villanueva can play some backup minutes at SF, plus if we keep Acie we can use the 19th pick for a wing).

PG – Jack / Flip / Acie
SG – JJ / Mo Evans
SF – Marvin / Chills / 19th pick
PF – Josh / Villanueva
C – Horford / Zaza

I havent dont the numbers yet, so maybe Manny or nire might know off the top if the numbers could work.

Fantasy League

June 11th, 2009
8:54 pm

Glad y’all like playing my draft. Keep it up!

Halsey

June 11th, 2009
8:57 pm

I don’t get why people think losing Marvin would be a big deal. I’d like to see the Hawks trade him for a Draft pick. The Hawks didn’t really seem to miss him much when he was gone. He is not a difference maker. Most of the time he just looks like a guy taking up space on the floor to me.

Astro Joe

June 11th, 2009
9:01 pm

I just checked our stats from last season. We were the 10th in Offensive Rating, which measures points per 100 possessions. But we also were outrebounded on both the defensive and offensive boards. Our offensive success was due to making more free throw attempts, making more 3s and being very good in the TO category (we protected the ball). But again, we were not built to run just based on our inability to effectively rebound the ball. So if Sund wants a lightening quick PG, then he better get someone to clean the glass. And while I would welcome Villanueva to the team, I don’t see him filling that need.

Silvio Manuel

June 11th, 2009
9:03 pm

No Bibby, No Zaza, No Flip, maybe No Marvin.

We are in deep darkness, where I love it.

Sautee

June 11th, 2009
9:37 pm

Astro Joe,

Careful using stats to bolster your argument.

No TELLING what niremetal will think! ;-)

I’m not sure that we couldn’t run a LOT more even with a rebounding minus. A lot of it is just PUSHING. Woody has these guys holding the reins in a strangle hold.

We also create turnovers with our D, giving chances to run. And even if we DO get out rebounded, IF we run and push tempo, we dictate to the other team and tire them out. It’s not like we get out rebounded 35-0.

One advantage our “smaller” bigs have is their mobility. If we pushed the ball and got Al and Josh 5 easy attempts each per game, we wouldn’t struggle to score so much overall. Of course JJ would have to be involved, so I’m not sure that will happen.

O'brien

June 11th, 2009
9:48 pm

Astro Joe, Zaza is good offensive rebounder, and Villanueva averages 6.3 rebounds in 26.5 minutes. In my opinion, our lack of rebounding is due mostly to 2 reasons:
1) lack of effort (how many games did Josh go with few rebounds)
2) Woody’s defensive scheme of switching everything. As a result, our bigs end up out of (rebounding) position.

Newbie Blogger

June 11th, 2009
10:02 pm

Hey everyone. So I’m new around here, but I’ve noticed that a lot of other new posters have popped in and made some suggestions. I like their suggestions for improving the team, and they got me really excited. Now I actually realize that they didn’t go far enough – I just don’t think they realize how much teams will want our players! And the draft is soooooooooooooo loaded with guys who’ll be stars! Let’s get as many of them as we can!

SO HERE’S MY PLAN FOR THE OFFSEASON:
1) Let Bibby and Zaza walk, but keep Marvin and Flip. Marvin will be willing to re-sign for less than we think. After all, his stats have stayed the same year after year, so clearly he hasn’t gotten any better. Why should he expect a raise?
2) Use our mid-level exception to sign Kobe. He’ll opt out of his contract to come here for $5 mil – I know it!
3) Trade JJ for the #2 pick and take Thabeet. JJ isn’t a star, so we might as well trade him for a tall guy with no heart and no offensive game. Besides, we won’t need JJ once we have Kobe.
4) Trade Speedy and Acie Law for Chris Paul. The Hornets are looking to save money, so they’ll jump at the chance to take Speedy back and get a successor for CP3.
5) Trade #19 pick and Mo for LeBron James and the Cavs 1st rounder (#30). The Cavs know that they’ll lose LeBron next summer anyway, so at least this way they’ll get something out of it.
6) Pick Ricky Rubio at #30. He’ll fall to us there, trust me.
7) Sign-and-trade Chills and Randolph Morris to Orlando for Dwight Howard. They have Gortat, so why would they need Howard too?

PG: Chris Paul/Ricky Rubio
SG: Kobe Bryant/Who cares?
SF: LeBron James/Marvin Williams
PF: Josh Smith/Al Horford
C: Dwight Howard/Thabeet

I know that leaves us a little weak at power forward and Kobe’s getting a bit old, but I think that should be good for at least a few more wins. It’s totally doable! Go do it, Sund!

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
10:06 pm

WHATS SEKOU MY COMMENT DONT POST NO MORE WHATS UP WITH THAT.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

Newbie Blogger

June 11th, 2009
10:07 pm

Dang it, I just realized that a couple of my trades might be just a bit outside the salary cap rules. Doggone it! Those are so annoying. Because otherwise, my plan would be SO doable!

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
10:08 pm

Is this guy saying that Oden refuse the chance for Hakeem help. And some question Josh work ethic…

“Jason Fleming:
To me, it’s not really up to Oden. If the team wants him to get quicker, he should work on getting quicker. I think they like where he is at now, and the quickness will come in offseason training. Hopefully that, along with a year of experience, will help him avoid those whistles. ANY big man who would not be willing to go to Hakeem’s camp should be immediately waived, I don’t care who it is.”

Hoops

June 11th, 2009
10:11 pm

O’brien & glw,

O’brien your plan may be more realistic than mine. However, I do like mine better. Chills will not come back from Greece this coming season. Why should he? He makes too much money over there and he can come back next summer as a FA. Another thought-Woody will not play Acie. So, trade him and get someone that he will play. If we cannot trade up for Curry, then trade up and get Jordan Hill to back up Bosh @ PF and don’t sign Charlie V. I still don’t think Curry will be chosen before the 8th pick.
As far as rebounding goes, you are right we must have better rebounding to be able to run. I think getting Bosh for Josh & Speedy gives us better size and rebounding. Play Bosh @ PF and use Horford and Zaza in the post. I probably cannot get Charlie V. with my plan because of the cap.
I like Sessions because he will push the break. We need more easy baskets! Get Bosh and Sessions and we will improve both our rebounding and our uptempo!

Hoops

June 11th, 2009
10:16 pm

Newbie Blogger,

You don’t have enough basketballs for that team, little alone money!

Astro Joe

June 11th, 2009
10:19 pm

Sautee, sure, but I just don’t see a Patty Mills being optimized if we simply quicken the pace. My vote is for a “half-court” PG, especially since that is what is played mostly in playoff games.

O’brien, I’m not smart enough to know which is the best way to defend the pick and roll. But I agree that some of the problem is related to effort. I just think we need to get better at cleaning the glass before we spend a 1st round pick on someone who may struggle with a poor rebounding team.

O'brien

June 11th, 2009
10:25 pm

Hoops, I like the trade for Bosh too. And I am okay with trading Acie for a higher draft pick to get the PG we want. I also like Sessions, but if we get Sessions, we wont be able to get Villanueva, so I chose Jack and Charlie V instead.

From what I’ve heard, Chills will still be an restricted FA next year. Like I’ve said though, if Chills doesnt come back to the Hawks, we still have Villanueva to play some backup SF and backup PF.

darrell starks

June 11th, 2009
10:26 pm

Who said bosh isnt a center he plays both powerford and center and to me he is better at the center because he is quicker than most center and he goes right around them or post up at the top of the key and hit that shot every time go get bosh sund he will be the best player on the team plus he will be that leader that we desperately need.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Reggie

June 11th, 2009
10:28 pm

Newbie Blogger: I think those moves might work.
Man I’m glad to be blogging basketball again. I can’t handle the Braves anymore. haha. So who is everyone wanting to pick in the first round right now. Lakers 37 first half points? My goodness.

niremetal

June 11th, 2009
10:30 pm

Melvin,

By pretty much universal agreement, Oden has a incredibly strong work ethic. He’s probably skipping Hakeem’s big man camp because he has other training activities planned that he and the Blazers feel would be better.

I might add that Hakeem – great a player as he was – does NOT have a great record as far as developing big men at his “camp.” His best work has been the one-on-sessions he did with Yao Ming and Josh Smith. The free “camp” that he runs is more often attended by the Diops and Diogus of the world, not the top prospects.

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:17 pm

Nire,

I guess you and Jason Fleming has different opinions of Hakeem teaching skills.

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:19 pm

Why is SVG forcing that midget back into the playing rotation…

niremetal

June 11th, 2009
11:22 pm

Jason Fleming and I have different opinions on lots of things. Starting with whether Jason Fleming ever actually watches NBA games.

Astro Joe

June 11th, 2009
11:24 pm

Alston leads the team to a game seven victory on the road against the champs. Follows that up by defeating the team with the league’s best regular season record, MVP and COY. So what does his coach do? Steals his confidence by going to Jameer in The Finals.

Like I have said numerous times, everyone has warts.

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:32 pm

Astro,

Agreed….

Astro Joe

June 11th, 2009
11:33 pm

Now who was asking about Courtney Lee and playing time? And I said if Pietrus hadn’t been injured, dude would have been competing with Reddick for cameo appearances? Pietrus is a playa… on both ends of the floor.

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:34 pm

Why is Nelson even in the game. He’s been ineffective and turnover prone…

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:37 pm

Slow down Astro. Lee has contribute important mins thur out the playoffs…

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:39 pm

Where is the 100 million dollar man Lewis been at tonight???

Rollins Tree

June 11th, 2009
11:40 pm

It feels like 3 years ago since the Cavs playoff series. Right?

Dizkey

June 11th, 2009
11:41 pm

Hey, I don’t read well. So, if anyone has echoed my comments above, then I apologize a trillion times. But…Hawks must improve their interior defense. Zaza is a nice piece off the bench, but he ain’t no enforcer in the middle. He just pretended to be one when he headbutted KG in 08. Who should $und acquire that can provide defense and rebounding at the center position? Good phawkin’ question. True centers are tougher to find than Waldo. But, Senor $und gets paid to do so. Therefore, he must rise to the challenge. Atlanta is best, when D creates offense via the fastbreak. I don’t wanna hear any noise about contracts or fantasy GM crap. If the Hawks want to contend, GM $und needs to also acquire Battier. This versatile player is able to provide stellar perimeter defense. Can you say that about any current Hawk(s)? I know, Mario West had a few good moments, but let’s get real. Also, Bibby must go. He’s too old for another year of the Woody philosophy. After 82 games of playing heavy minutes, he’ll wear down in time for the playoffs, just like this past season. So will JJ, just like this past season. But, JJ cant’ be replaced. Flip must be re-signed, because he can provide a spark when Johnson is “tired” or “kind of quits.” At PG, we need youth, tenacity, speed. Ty Lawson, Ray Felton just a few options. As far as Childress goes, ET says phone home. I’ll be your best friend. LMHFAO! (HF= Hawks Fan).
P.S. Alonzo Mourning is MEAN on Pros Vs Joes. Can’t shoot free throws, though.

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:42 pm

My goodness, Dwight Howard is a beast. He’s one effective left hand move away from being unstoppable…

Melvin

June 11th, 2009
11:45 pm

Hedo or Hero…

RealSquawk

June 11th, 2009
11:46 pm

Ball Movement

Options

Game Plan

O have I missed you.

Dizkey

June 11th, 2009
11:54 pm

Hate to see that 3 by Fisher. C’mon Orlando! Please don’t let this LA hater down!

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
12:01 am

Does Nelson have some incriminating pictures of SVG or something. He’s pull a Woody move tonite. Bench a player that played well in the previous game.

Reggie

June 12th, 2009
12:01 am

Alston is so pissed right now.

Reggie

June 12th, 2009
12:02 am

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
12:03 am

Is Alston even sitting on the bench????

Dizkey

June 12th, 2009
12:03 am

Skip to the lou.

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
12:05 am

Did he skip to the locker room early..

Dizkey

June 12th, 2009
12:07 am

Always hurts, when you miss 15 FTs. Make just 1 more in regulation and the game never sees OT!

Dizkey

June 12th, 2009
12:10 am

Oh, nooooooooooooooooooooo!

Najeh Davenpoop

June 12th, 2009
12:13 am

Orlando has shot 18 free throws in the 4th quarter and overtime while the Lakers have shot zero. Clearly, the only explanation can be that the refs are biased against the Lakers. This must all be part of David Stern’s master plan…

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
12:13 am

Missed FTs and coaching lost this game for the Magic.

Dizkey

June 12th, 2009
12:15 am

Pau Gasol doin’ work. Game AND series pretty much over. Pietrus might as well knock his block off. Ain’t much left for Orlando to lose.

niremetal

June 12th, 2009
12:16 am

Never seen so many missed free throws…

Dizkey

June 12th, 2009
12:23 am

Just like a missed Magic FT, I’m gone! Goodnight, everybody.

kirkinga

June 12th, 2009
12:28 am

Let’s not forget to recognize Jameer Nelson for his Bibby-esque defense on Derek Fisher allowing the tying shot in regulation and once again the Lakers take advantage to force OT and a commanding lead in the series.

Hoops

June 12th, 2009
12:35 am

The Lakers are just better! I want the series to go seven, but it looks like the Lakers in 5. That’s two games in a row that missed free throws have cost the looser the game. Kobe is Kobe. Fisher stole the show, but Ariza came up big!
Maybe the Magic will get mad @ Pietrus and trade him to the Hawks!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 12th, 2009
12:43 am

Well, after LAL clinches the title, we can see Woodson’s excuse next year when people question him:

“We beat the NBA champs by a sizeable margin”

HawkKingBibby

June 12th, 2009
1:07 am

The Magic choked but then again the Lakers didnt exactly seize the moment either. The refs kind of seized it for them. Thats 2 ot games won by LA where there were horrible calls in the Lakers favor. DWIGHT HAS GOT TO MAKE ONE OF THOSE FREE THROWS THOUGH. As much as I would love to see the Hawks in the nba finals, if they were losing OT games like this I dont think my heart could take it.

Big Ray

June 12th, 2009
2:07 am

Hand this thing to the Lakers already. Thirteen days until the draft.

Jhan,

I don’t see Sund doing anything that puts Al Horford on the bench. He’s a starter in this league.

Astro Joe,

True, we have rebounding issues. There are ways to solve them. It’s not the rebounding that makes me think twice about having a lightning quick pg. It’s the fact that we just don’t RUN. We’re actually made for it, but we don’t do it. As others have mentioned, the switches on defense have kept our bigs out of position a lot.

Having said that, Josh Smith has made things difficult with a lack of effort, and injuries to Horford and Marvin haven’t helped either. Health and committment to rebounding, along with an added low post presence (via free agency or otherwise) would help a lot. It all sounds so simple, doesn’t it?

Samuel

June 12th, 2009
6:39 am

Looks like the Magic have been going to the Mark Price school of FT shooting. You don’t deserve to win. Pietrus should get suspended for that last foul. That leaves C Lee on Kobe all night in game 5. It’s ova.

What was SVG thinking by leaving Nelson in the game on defense that last play.Should have gone with Lee.

Forget Patty Mills. “No more midgets please”!!!

Sekou Smith

June 12th, 2009
8:00 am

I agree with Steamboat, my man Pietrus was trying to knock Gasol’s spine loose. He might have to take a seat for Game 5.

And this thing with Rafer Altson and Jameer Nelson has been handled terribly by the Magic. It’s not the only thing that’s costing them but I’m leaning to it being the most critical mistake that’s been made. Alston played great in Game 3 and then you yo-yo him again. And then Van Gundy’s post game dismissal of the experience factor … he’s out of his league.

I still think the Magic send this thing back to LA, but there shouldn’t be more than one game out there.

Sautee

June 12th, 2009
9:23 am

Astro Joe,

I wasn’t responding to your “lack of rebounding” post because I was in the Patty Mills camp. Not at all.

I just fail to see why we don’t take advantage of a nightly mismatch we have with our young bigs, and put them in a position for easy baskets. It’s insanity, when all it takes is effort and energy. And THAT could be done even at our current rebounding rate.

And to be clear, I’m NOT advocating some kind of “D’Antoni get a shot off in 7 seconds bull”.

Just take advantage when we can a few times a game, and not make offense SO hard. You KNOW our bigs can consistently beat their man down the court, so if THAT is an advantage WHY, OH WHY do we not use it? Insanity.

MBZ

June 12th, 2009
9:27 am

Pietrus was just frustrated…But why would Gasol go for that dunk when they clearly had the game wrapped up? Anyway….

The draft is fast approaching and I hope Sund has a plan that will pan out for this team. That Toney Douglass guy seems like he would be a good fit and Alade Aminu seems like a good replacement for Solo… We might have to work a trade in the late second round to get it done if we like the local guys. The thing is, if Bibby comes back (which, to my dismay, he probably will) then we have to draft and be committed to groom a point guard. It is so frustrating to see the lack of vision through the course of the season not allowing Acie to play, not giving the bench a chance to develop and grow. As we saw last night, Phil Jackson played the entire team before the end of the 1st quarter. Mbenga didnt play a whole lot during the season but he knows his role and the coaching staff has confidence in him as a stop gap when guys get in foul trouble. And he came in and played good defense and had a nice block and did something positive. I think the only young player on the bench that Woodson has instilled confidence in is Mario West. He has zero offense, but he works like a madman and gets rewarded. How does a coach get a 1st round draft pick who was compared to Chauncey Billups coming out of college and make no attempt whatsoever do develop him. Why is the coach not held accountable for the growth of the team? This draft might not mean anything if the young guys we get ride the bench because our coach is to caught up in winning now. He runs the team as if we are in win now mode.Our growth is stunted when we run Joe Johnson into the ground every night. Our offense suffers when we dont run a system outside of iso-joe. Our defense suffers when Josh Smith is not held accountable on a nightly basis to put in the effort. Our rebounding is flat when we switch all the damn time. And we do the same thing. We need to give Marvin and Horford more touches. Give them confidence. Help them develop offensively. Give Acie the team to run for stretches. Nurture his game. Mark Price is on the couching staff for God sake………

I just think that this team’s offseason will be influenced by the coaching philosophy. We aren’t going to aquire a penetrating PG because the coach likes a shooting pg (Bibby). That, to me, is the biggest thing we need to address before training camp

The Truth

June 12th, 2009
9:28 am

I had been giving SVG much credit in making adjustments in the previous games despite some losses. But that bone-headed move of having Nelson in the game for all of the forth quarter exceeded any previous level of criticism compared to Woody. Nelson was ineffective on offense, a liability on defense in addition to being too short and injured. An example of this was when he gave Fisher too much space for an easy three with 11 seconds to go in the game. Rafer Altson should have closed the game out based on his play-off contributions. SVG is more interested in his player’s role status than winning a championship. To snob Altson this way in a critical playoff game may go down as the worst coaching move in the history of the NBA finals.

Astro Joe

June 12th, 2009
9:29 am

Ray, as I recall, Larry Bird’s Celtics were a very good fast break team. Certainly not because they were full of speedsters or athletes, but because they had 4 guys (front court and DJ) who were excellent rebounders. Having sprinters is fine but they need the ball. Consider that two of the best fast break PGs in history, Magic and Kidd, were also two of the best rebounding PGs in history. If we want to assemble a running team, we need to find some glass cleaners.

At this point, I’m on board with the best player available approach. We have too many FAs who may not return to assume that we are “loaded” at any position. Earl Clark, a PG (but make sure that he is a willing defender based on college footage), Mullens, Budinger or Ellington are all fine with me. And pairing #19 & Speedy for a vet is even better.

Astro Joe

June 12th, 2009
9:34 am

Sautee, I agree with that approach. When you do get the rebound, run. I have no problems there. Unfortunately, unless things change, that “run thing” won’t happen nearly as often with the poor board work. It’s the double edge sword of having a smaller, quicker front court who can’t/won’t put in the work to create more offensive possessions. How many times did we see the Cavs grab offensive rebounds and get multiple shots? I recall a former Hawk player who was really good at fighting on the boards. Had a really big afro and was also a very good finisher on the break. Oh well. He was real easy to replace.

dap01

June 12th, 2009
10:07 am

Great post MBZ!

kwooden1

June 12th, 2009
10:08 am

Looks to me that the HAWKS will have a tough time getting any value out of Speedy’s expiring contract. Their aren’t that many teams that need to clear space for the 2010/11 season. Hopefully teams have seen enough of Speedy to think he’s health and can produce something. Otherwise his 5M won’t bring back much. I still think we should keep Acie and draft Mullen or Tyler H. with the 19th pick. If they’re not available, then picking the best player on the board is fine with me.

I think our starting five, (if they keep Bibby) can play with anyone. But they need another score off the bench. Especially a guy that sub for JJ. Villanueva can sub for Marvin or JS but that still leaves JJ playing a lot of minutes. Evans can play SG, but not like JJ. Flip is a combo guy, but Woodson likes subbing him for Bibby. Acie plays like a combo guard also, which I think is another reason he didn’t play much. Hopefully some team will be willing to part with SG for Speedy + someone else.

GO HAWKS!!!

O'brien

June 12th, 2009
10:08 am

I blame SVG for the loss. I agree there is no way you dont put Rafer in the game. Ha played well in every series so far (big shots, good defense). But SVG made the type of move that Woody would make. Go back to your “guy” and ignore the guy who’s been playing well so far. Alston plays better defense, and Fisher would not have been so wide open.

This also fuels the debate, if you are up 3, shouldnt you foul and send them to the line inside of giving them a 3 pt opportunity?

I also blame Dwight Howard. You can’t go 6-13 in a crucial game. And he has to make one of those FT to make it a 2 possession game. This reminds me of Nick Anderson back in the 90’s. Same thing. Missed 2 FT, Houston made a 3 to go to OT and went on to win the game, swept the series, NBA champions.

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
10:37 am

Obrien,

Wasn’t Nick Anderson part of the open ceremonies for the game. Talk about poetic justice…dah

Samuel

June 12th, 2009
10:39 am

You can excuse Howard somewhat. He’s been missing them all year but Turk’s really hurt them.
On running:
It’s more a mindset than anything. Rebounding too but more a mindset. Woody is a Larry Brown student. Nuff said.
The Old Celtics are a perfect example of a team without great athletes but would push the ball down your throat. No player has ever been fast enough to outrun a pass.

I always illustrate this with my players by letting the fastest one take off down the court and when they get about 3/4, I trow a pass which beats them to the baseline. Works every time!

Justin31

June 12th, 2009
11:03 am

Sekou, there are rumors floating on RealGM about olympiacos offering a huge contract to marvin. is that real?

A Tribe Called Quest

June 12th, 2009
11:16 am

Here we are witnessing SVG panicking. LOL Shaq must be rolling over in laughter in his mansion right now. Van Gundy is wayyyy too emotional a coach to win a title. Everything haunts/scares/freaks this guy out when it goes wrong

Ariose

June 12th, 2009
11:19 am

CP, A.J Price reminds me a lot of Mo williams. A scorer by nature and a deadly spot-up shooter. Maybe we should draft him? That way we can Nab Ellington in the 1st round…

niremetal

June 12th, 2009
11:19 am

The “Mike Brown’s job is in danger” BS is further proof of how risky it is to believe a word of what you read on the “new sports media” sites like Hoopsworld and Pro Basketball News. Unless you see a named source on the blog or a reference to a primary news source (preferably a local newspaper where the discussed team plays), believe what you read at your own risk. Even news sources like ESPN seem to make $hit up occasionally – remember the fiasco where ESPN said we were trying to trade Smoove and the draft pick that became Horford to Phoenix for Amare? And then the next day they reported that Steve Belkin had blocked the trade, despite the fact that Belkin had been kicked out of the ownership group and had absolutely no say in personnel decisions anymore?

Seriously – unless the source is a beat writer who actually travels with the team and talks to them on a daily basis, it’s caveat emptor with basketball news. If you get it off a blog or a “new media” web source, you’re really rolling the dice on whether you’re getting remotely accurate info.

Ariose

June 12th, 2009
11:20 am

Not sure price is a great playmaker though….but Bibby is the same way, save for the occasional lob over the top of the defense….

Ariose

June 12th, 2009
11:20 am

Nire, I agree.

Ariose

June 12th, 2009
11:22 am

Van gundy made a bad decision by not putting Alston back in the game. Nelson looked Timid out there, and other than Howard, Alston is the only other player who can consistantly score inside….

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
11:27 am

Ariose,

Think Curtis Jerrels in the 2nd round, man. Do I need to send you a link to remind…lol

bigstack19

June 12th, 2009
11:34 am

Hawks need a point guard so they will likely draft a 6ft 9in swingman.

Ariose

June 12th, 2009
12:12 pm

LOL@ Melvin. He keeps slipping my mind. That boy needs some more hype!!! Guess we’ll just have to create it around here!!1

HawkKingBibby

June 12th, 2009
1:30 pm

The more I think about the players Rick Sund drafted in Seattle the more I think WE SHOULD TRADE THE PICK. This guy is a terrible drafter.

cp

June 12th, 2009
2:44 pm

Ariose I had forgot about Price. I would probably take Tyrese Rice over price. I like Rice’s game. He is very underrated. I think this draft is a little deeper than most give it credit for. We might not get a star with our pick but I’m sure we can get a kid who can contribute. There are so many options at 19 that I would just take the best player available. I wish we had 2 second round picks because I think a lot of sleepers will be there.

jhan

June 12th, 2009
2:55 pm

If Woody is a good coach because we went from 37 to 47 wins:

Doesn’t that also mean Sund did a good job of swapping Mo/Flip for Childress? He also saved several million dollars in the process.

We didn’t win 47 when Childress was here did we?

Some may argue that we would have been better with Childress & Mo/Flip. I wouldn’t disagree. I also wouldn’t disagree with the argument that we would be better with a different style of coach.

Aren’t stats awesome? You can use the exact same stats to argue multiple sides of an argument.

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
3:15 pm

Jhan,

Childress didn’t play an entire season with Bibby at the PG position either. Would you say that has some impact to the 47 wins as well??????

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
3:17 pm

Where the heck is Doc? Unlike for him to be MIA this long…

G-Man

June 12th, 2009
3:28 pm

Melvin, that is a great point about Chill and Bibby.

Big Ray

June 12th, 2009
3:46 pm

Niremetal,

What exactly is anybody risking by reading an article on a “new site?” Are there some “old sites” we should be going to? If you’re worried about false information, don’t watch the news, don’t read a newspaper or magazine, and run down the streets with your hands over your ears yelling “I’m not listening, I’m not listening!”

I don’t recall anybody (and certainly not myself) saying that anything printed anywhere was the gospel. Just interesting. Lord knows I don’t want to lead anybody astray….

By the way, should we also so vehemently censor those links you posted a little while back? Just askin’.

niremetal

June 12th, 2009
3:47 pm

See, jhan knows the game. There’s 3 types of lies : Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

O'brien

June 12th, 2009
3:49 pm

cp, I’m sure Ariose remembers as well, but on draft night when we selected Salim (ever early in the second round), Dickie V said he was a steal, based on his production numbers (and 3pt % from college). We have selected Solo in the second round (he gets little PT, although he is productive), we have selected Andersen and Cenk Ayol (looks like 2 wasted picks).

I’m just saying that I am not confident in the Hawks (Sund/Woody) that they will do a good job with their draft picks.

Big Ray

June 12th, 2009
4:17 pm

Melvin,

Agreed on Chill and Bibby.

Astro Joe,

I sure miss that afro-wearin’ fella. He helped a lot.

Big Ray

June 12th, 2009
4:22 pm

“Aren’t stats awesome? You can use the exact same stats to argue multiple sides of an argument.”

Yeah, I found a colorful way of bringing that up a few days ago. It started an argument. Go figure. Oh wait….no, DON’T go figure. It will only get you in trouble.

Oh, and we’ve also found that stats become inexplicably contextually- challenged when they become suddenly inconvenient to the party who was originally using them to try and prove a point. Heh heh heh….It’s not exactly a rare disease.

Big Ray

June 12th, 2009
4:24 pm

Love, peace, and chicken grease my peeps. I’m off to an evil web site hosted by wrongdoers of the worst kind, where I will surely be led astray by the words of liars, fools, and people who are paid to write about the NBA. It’s called HoopsHype. Pray for my blogging soul…

Melvin

June 12th, 2009
4:28 pm

What game was SVG watching(coaching)? That midget shouldn’t have been playing in the game at all. Then SVG wants to used the excuse that he was part of the group that was playing well. Uh, wasn’t Rafer playing with the group that created a double digit half time lead? Then he use a weak excuse that the guy sat too long on the bech to comeback in the game. As if Rafer sat there by choice. Whew, we thought Woody can come up with some lame excuses…

“Van Gundy had a different take.

“I thought we had a very, very bad third quarter,” he said. “And then it wasn’t so much one guy over the other, it was just we had a unit in the fourth quarter that I thought was playing real well. And then you get down to the point where Rafer hasn’t played in 10 or 12 minutes, I thought it would be hard to bring him back.””

Astro Joe

June 12th, 2009
4:36 pm

jhan, no doubt. And we have all manipulated stats to defend our position. And most will continue to do so, even if it sometimes leaves us singing the Cameo classic “Talking Out the Side of Your Neck”. And just because a poker player can win a hand, it doesn’t mean the dealer gave him the best hand. Chill was at least a jack. Mo is more like a seven.

Astro Joe

June 12th, 2009
4:37 pm

Ray, we’ll leave some bread crumbs for you… or better yet, popcorn kernels for you to find your way back to the website of happy Hawks fans who wear rosed-colored glasses and enjoy the beauty of their own front yard.

Astro Joe

June 12th, 2009
4:45 pm

And RandMo is 5 free watered-down drinks from a really ugly waitresss as you lose your plane ticket back to Atlanta because you can’t tell an ace from a 4. Not that I’m speaking from experience or anything.

Jonathan

June 12th, 2009
5:12 pm

I can’t believe how poor-quality these NBA teams are.

The Lakers have to be one of the most underachieving teams that will ever win the NBA Championship. The same team that couldn’t finish off the Rockets (who were without Yao, T-Mac, Mutumbo and mostly Artest with his mediocre performances) in less than 7 games. They stole Gasol from Memphis for freaking mustard packets.

The Magic have the most panicky coach I’ve ever seen. The guy yells and yells and yells and won’t let his players do anything on their own–I guess Phil Jackson is a unique coach who lets his players figure things out

The Hawks: Were they really the #4 seed? That’s a testament to how awful the East was. To think the Hawks would win 1 game in a series vs. the Lakers, Celtics, Magic, Cavs (Lol), Rockets (probably), Spurs, Nuggets is just laughable..

David Stern should be ashamed of the mediocre quality of the NBA teams this year. Gonna have to see Luke Walton and Adam Morrison wearing championship rings…

Kobe the arrogant r@pist who yells at teammates and curses at them

jhan

June 12th, 2009
6:26 pm

What does Stern have to do with the quality of teams? Does the lack of 17-18 year olds make teams worse?

Astro – great poker analogy. Chills is definitely an upgrade over Mo. Just not better than the Flip/Mo combo. At least it takes 2 guys to be an upgrade over Chills. While not having the best all around game Chills was always one of my favorites. If he could shoot a jumpshot from over his head instead of chest high he would be worth more.

Melvin you are dead on with the Bibby/Chills comment. He would have been the recipient of some nice lobs on the break from Bibby.

The Truth

June 12th, 2009
8:01 pm

Melvin

Regarding your June 12th, 2009
4:28 pm post:

I’ll co-sign that; my sentiment exactly

kwooden1

June 12th, 2009
11:08 pm

I’m still really wondering what Sund’s going to do with Speedy. The only teams I’ve seen that might want Speedy’s expiring contract are Indiana or New Orleans. And the only players I think those teams would be willing to part with are Mo Pete or Tinsley. I wouldn’t mind having Mo Pete coming off the bench, but why would New Orleans even do that deal? Maybe the HAWKS throw in the 19th pick, but I don’t think I would do that if I were making the decisions for the HAWKS.

I think Ray or Astro made this point a few days ago which really is the issue. What kind of team are the HAWKS adding to this summer? This question influences any pick, trade or pickup they have in mind. Woody clearly wants a half-court defensive minded team, but the current players are made to run. To appease Woody, Sund would have to move at least one core piece from the roster (Marvin, JS, etc). If Sund wants to make Woody run more often, he could draft and/or pickup another SG/SF. I’m hoping he gets a rebounding PF and another scoring SG to come off the bench.

GO HAWKS!!

kirkinga

June 12th, 2009
11:17 pm

Oh, and we’ve also found that stats become inexplicably contextually- challenged when they become suddenly inconvenient to the party who was originally using them to try and prove a point

Geez Ray, that made my head hurt…lol! I think it is interesting, speaking of context, how the use of stats vary from sport to sport. I don’t know anything about fantasy basketball, but fantasy baseball has ushered in a myriad of new, and supposedly more precise and “enlightened”.

But I think all would be best everyone remember that stats are simply data, and we should all be guided by the old saw that ,”data isn’t in formation, information isn’t knowledge, and knowledge isn’t wisdom.

Then again the only stat that really matters is W-L!

Go Hawks!!

Nasty Nas

June 13th, 2009
12:39 am

LOL @ Brandon Jennings trashing all his fellow draftees in the media, yet he’s the one who sucked for a year in Europe and couldn’t even get a high enough score to get into the amazing-academically Arizona

Lol he’s gonna be trash

Ed

June 13th, 2009
1:04 am

Found the assessment of Rick Sund…it isn’t very encouraging as the article is about the worst GM’s in the league.

Rick Sund (Seattle Supersonics)
[trade: +5, re-sign: +3] 2/03 – Sund took advantage of the Ray Allen/Michael Redd situation in Milwaukee by stealing Ray Ray away, only giving up a washed-up point guard (Gary Payton) and a guy who still can’t shoot (Desmond Mason). However, Allen is a guy who commands max money but doesn’t provide max results, which is why the ’05 Allen re-sign gets a +3.

[+1] 7/03 – He did a fair job landing two serviceable players in the unspectacular Nick Collison (#12) and the wispy Luke Ridnour (#14), but neither guy has developed into an established starter. In that draft, Sund passed on the likes of David West, Boris Diaw, Leandro Barbosa and Josh Howard. He’d trade both Collison and Ridnour for any of those guys in a heartbeat.

[-14] – In the next three drafts, Sund picked three project centers: Robert Swift (#12) in ’04, Johan Petro (#25) in ’05 and Saer Sene (#10) in ’06. In drafting these guys, he passed on Al Jefferson, Josh Smith, Delonte West, Tony Allen, Kevin Martin, David Lee and Marcus Williams. Swift is injured while Petro and Sene are combining for a dreadful 7.5 points and 5.4 rebounds this season. What a brutal draft run.

[trade: +3, re-sign: +1] 2/06 – Turning short timer Vladimir Radmanovic into Chris Wilcox was a nice move, though he hasn’t developed into a 15/10 guy like the Sonics hoped. The team may eventually regret re-signing him last summer.

[+1] 2/06 – Sund acquired Earl Watson for Reggie Evans, trading toughness in the frontcourt for toughness in the backcourt. I’m convinced that Watson can anchor a bench, but he’s not yet a starter.

[-5] 2/07 – Sund’s biggest mistake was not to trade Rashard Lewis before the deadline after deciding not to sign him to an extension before the season. Now it looks like Lewis will opt out this summer, which means the Sonics may get nothing in return for their stud swingman.

Final score: -5

In fairness, Sund has had to deal with franchise’s fiscal problems and potential ownership change, though it’s clear he’s better at trading players than he is at drafting them. And that Lewis debacle is going to hurt.

niremetal

June 13th, 2009
3:32 am

kirk and kwooden – good posts!

Melvin

June 13th, 2009
8:16 am

ED,

The assessment of Sund is funny b/c it reference him passing on two Hawks players which was drafted by his predecessor (BK). The same guy that many on here dispise of… Good Luck Hawks…

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
8:24 am

Kwooden1,

I don’t see Mo Pete as worth throwing in our 1st round pick, plus Speedy’s contract. Dude can shoot some, but I figure we can re-sign Flip Murray for less than that, and get a guy who will drive, not just shoot.

As for trading Claxton’s contract (and the pick), that’s probably a decent way to get Jarrett Jack from Indiana. Of course, you’re right that they’d probably much rather give us Jamal Tinsley, who is probably still under contract. Screw that, I don’t want him. He’s a vet, but he’s got injury issues, and his own team doesn’t want him. That’s never good when you’re a vet.

Kirk,

Sometimes using more complicated verbage than is necessary to get a point across, is a good way to get that point across without seeming offensive. It all depends on whether people can read between the lines, heh heh!

Great points in your post, and I agree that the W-L column is the bottom line.

Hoops

June 13th, 2009
9:01 am

kwooden1,

In response to your concerns about Speedy, I would like to suddest that the Hawks make this trade and really get something good from Speedy’s contract:
Trade Josh for Bosh and add Speedy to make the contracts work per NBA trade rules. Toronto should go for this because they know that they will loose Bosh next summer(expiring contract). They get Josh for the next 4 years and Speedy’s expiring contract. The Hawks should go for this because it makes them serious contenders right away and they will have two serious expiring contracts for next summer in JJ & Bosh. That’s over 30m to use on the FA sweepstakes of the summer of ‘10. If the Hawks can make a serious run @ the Finals with JJ & Bosh, they will probably both be real interested in resigning with the Hawks. If the Hawks can’t resign both, then they have over 30m to get other really good FA.

If we don’t make this move, we will not contend next year or the year after because JJ will walk!

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
9:08 am

Melvin,

I noticed that myself, and had to laugh as well! I wouldn’t be surpised if that pick is traded. Really, Sund has some options in this somewhat weak draft. Here’s one way he could go:

Sund could work up some trade ideas/options with the #19 pick (or both picks), and try to get himself a piece from another team, such as a young veteran pg. Of course, he could also add in Speedy as bait.

But he doesn’t have to do it right away. Let’s say there are a few players he likes better than any others in the draft. He could put his trade ideas on the back burner until he sees what happens. If any one of them is on the board when our pick comes up, he can decide which one he wants. If they’re NOT, then he can draft a guy who is emminently tradeable.

So, he ends up trading the draft rights to whomever, plus whatever else he needs to get the veteran player he wants.

That’s just one way to go.

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
9:17 am

Hoops,

I feel like the whole “free agent sweepstakes of 2010″ is overblown. Okay, so if we trade for Bosh, we’d have two expiring max contracts for 2010. Now what? Who do we get in this free-for-all, and how can you guarantee that we’ll get them?

Problem #1: If you’re banking on getting one of the high profile players in the summer of 2010, you better be adding him to a roster that already has a good/very good player or two on it. If not, then what’s the motivation for any high profile free agent to come here? We’d essentially be starting over or rebuilding. Want an example of the need for more than one high profile player? Try the Cleveland Cavs. They added a good player in Mo Williams, to play alongside Lebron James. Still wasn’t enough, as the Cavs didn’t make it to the NBA Finals.

Problem#2: Which two big-time free agents can you really expect to get? Can you afford both, and still maintain a reasonably good supporting cast, along with a serviceable bench? Remember, both free agents (again, you will need TWO of these guys to compete among the elite) have to fit together. Best case scenario is that one is a frontcourt star, and the other is a backcourt star. Even then, they still must fit. Fit the team, fit the coach, fit each other. Want an example of a not-so-great fit? How about Elton Brand and Andre Iguodala, and the Sixers. That one might still be worked out, but there is no doubt that Iggy and his teammates struggled with Brand on the floor.

Problem#3: Swinging for the fences is like trying to shoot the devil in the back. What if you miss? Now you have $30 million to play with, but where are you going to spend it? Probably on some guys who aren’t going to give you your money’s worth.

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
9:18 am

Well, I’m off to Bradley’s blog, which apparently has something on it about trading JJ vs. trading Josh Smith. This should be interesting (maybe, maybe not).

Niremetals need not apply. ;)

Hoops

June 13th, 2009
9:41 am

Big Ray,

I hear what you are saying and you have a good point. I still say that if trade Josh for Bosh and throw in Speedy to make it legal that we become serious contenders next year! Where do we go from there? Success will bring JJ and Bosh back to us. If not, we have the money and money talks!!!

O'brien

June 13th, 2009
9:50 am

Hoops, Ray,

If the Hawks let Bibby go, resign Flip and Zaza, and get Charlie V and Jarrett Jack, our bench will be better than it was last season. Make the trade Josh/piece for Bosh, and we should be able to resign both JJ and Bosh next year. JJ always asks for Vets, and Bosh is considered a vet (although he is only 2 years older than Josh, and 1 more year in the league). Whenever people talk about Josh, they say “he’s only 23, he’s still learning, he hasnt matured yet. I think JJ would take Bosh in a heartbeat, because he is an All-Star 20 and 10 guy every night.

The Hawks should be able to resign both JJ and Bosh next year, although they might combine to make $34-$36 mil.

Ariose

June 13th, 2009
10:31 am

You know, Bosh has had knee problems in the past and J-Smoove has a clean Bill of health……

Hoops

June 13th, 2009
10:47 am

O’brien,
Even if the Hawks can’t re-sign both JJ and Bosh, these players can be had with the money that the Hawks will have to spend-Gay, Miller, Aldredge, & Roy.

I’ll agree that we can get either Charlie V or Sessions from the Bucs this summer. They can’ afford to re-sign both. If we make the Josh for Bosh trade, I would rather get Sessions and keep Acie. Resign Flip, Zaza, & Marvin. Look @ this team:
PG-Sessions, Acie
SG-JJ, Flip
SF-Marvin, Evans
PF-Bosh, #19 pick, Morris (Horford can play 4 some w/Zaza)
C-Horford, Zaza

That’s a contender right there! The sad thing is that Sund could make this happen!!! This team can be had for the same money that we have invested right now!

Melvin

June 13th, 2009
10:49 am

Ray

“Let’s say there are a few players he likes better than any others in the draft. ”

And there lies the problem. I don’t think the guy is a good judge of talent. Just look at his draft history…

O'brien

June 13th, 2009
11:04 am

Hoops, both are restricted FA, but I chose Jack over Sessions because the Pacers are unlikely to match Jack’s offer (they’re still paying Tinsley and TJ Ford), whereas the Bucks might match Sessions’ offer. Also, Jack has a .336 3pt%, and Sessions is only .22 3pt%. That being said, I would take either of them over Bibby.

Not that they would come here, but LeBron and Wade will also be available next year lol.

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
11:11 am

Hoops,

Trust me, I’m not thumbing my nose at the Josh for Bosh trade. I’d do it. Of course, now Josh will kick me off his online entourage, but I’ll cope somehow. ;)

O’brien,

Actually, that makes sense. I can see JJ being happy with a veteran all-star on the squad with him. Really, this is more about fit than anything else. Is it still JJ’s team, or is it now Bosh’s? Does either guy really care about all that? And who now becomes the #1 option, and who is #2? I know, I’m nitpicking, but this stuff exists. Well, either way we are looking at two max contracts, and the trick will be sandwiching all the right pieces around them. I like the idea of getting Charlie V and re-signing Zaza and Flip.

It really wouldn’t make sense for JJ to have an issue with that. After all, he’s been whining and b!tching about veterans (with talent) ever since he….left a team full of them to come here…but that’s besides the point. Glad he’s here, despite the bad taste his playoff performance left, along with all the tire marks he left on his teammates throughout the year. Wow, never knew he had a CDL. Anybody get the number on that bus?

Melvin,

Don’t even go there with the history of Sund’s draft picks. I’ll have nightmares all the way up until June 25th. My guess is that two of his favorites in the draft are BJ Mullens and Tyler Hansbrough. Mullens probably goes before we pick. Hansbrough may be right up his alley, but then I could be wrong (he could like a SG better). You never know. But I wouldn’t be suprised to see either guy don a Hawks hat at the podium if either is on the board at #19 (and its likely that Hansbrough will be).

Whether or not either guy is the best pick is another story altogether….

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
11:18 am

O’brien,

Interesting thoughts on Jack vs. Sessions. The issue I keep running up against with Jarrett Jack is that Indy really doesn’t want Tinsley. They’d rather give him up, but nobody else really wants him (well, that I know of, and I don’t know squat, really). Part of the problem would be his contract. Would they really be willing to give Jack up, knowing how brittle TJ Ford is? If I were them, I wouldn’t, unless the money is just too much.

I figure they’ll either try to find a way to unload Tinsley (and take a loss in the process), and either grab another pg for back-up duties, or simply draft one. But I could be wrong.

Not arguing against Jarrett Jack, just wondering if it could be pulled off.

O'brien

June 13th, 2009
12:05 pm

Ray,

Technically, it would still be JJ’s team (Boston is still Pierce’s team, although KG is the emotional leader). JJ would still be team captain, but Bosh would be the guy who speaks up. The Hawks would take the next step, because we would have 2 legit Robins, 2 guys who are arguably top 5 at their positions. Feed Bosh the ball, and that would lead to open shots for JJ and Marvin.

And even with $36 mil in 2 guys, the Hawks should still be able to have a decent team around them, if Sund knows what he’s doing.

Speaking of Sund, I am also concerned about his track record in the draft.

Hoops

June 13th, 2009
12:26 pm

O’brien & Big Ray,

Let’s talk NBA Draft for a minute. I have listed below 13 players that I predict may or may not be available to the Hawks @ pick #19. Which one do you predict that the Hawks will pick and why? Maybe you like a player that I don’t have listed.

PG-E. Maynor 6′3, T. Lawson 5′11, J. Holiday 6′4″
SG-C. Budinger 6′7″, T. Williams 6′6″, W. Ellington 6′5″
SF-O. Casspi 6′9″, D. Brown 6′8″, D. Jones 6′7″, D. James 6′7″
PF-T. Hansbrough 6′9″, J. Pendergraph 6′10″
C-B.J. Mullens 7′0″

Astro Joe

June 13th, 2009
1:13 pm

Hoops, I’d say Mullens in your scenario. Sund has shown that he is willing to draft projects at the center position. And we all know that bigs are more expensive in free agency. So financially, drafting one is cheaper than signing one. Also, Sund could take the approach that Acie has a better chance to develop into a viable contributor than any young big on our roster. Lastly, if he is concerned with Howard, Lopez and Philly’s collection of bigs, then investing in a young big makes sense for the long-run.

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
1:21 pm

Astro Joe,

I’m going with your pick in that scenario.

Incidentally, can we go with the bread crumbs next time I decide to fly the coup? Those popcorn kernels led me back to a Cleveland blog. I’m still not sure what happened there, but the residents keep mumbling about a lot of unused white powder and how it was unable to overcome some sort of “magic.” Weird….

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
1:23 pm

O’brien,

I hear you. That makes sense as well (It’s JJ’s team, but Bosh does all the talking/leading).

Yeah, the tricky part is putting all the right pieces around the two starts. But the two stars is a concept all to itself. It would be nice.

RaJaH

June 13th, 2009
1:30 pm

I just found an interesting article on DraftExpress about David Anderson wanting to play in the NBA this year. Don’t know if it has been posted yet…

“In the awkwardly unnecessary 3rd/4th place game previous to the final, Barcelona managed to easily knock off a very jaded Olympiacos squad, in large part due to another terrific outing by Australian big man David Andersen, with 20 points in 26 minutes, on 8-12 shooting (3/5 3P). Although this wasn’t the most competitive setting you’ll find, Andersen still did a nice job showcasing his excellent skill-level, primarily in the form of his jump-shot, knocking down an array of spot-up, pull-up, turnaround and pick and pop jumpers, in the post, from 18-20 feet, and all the way out beyond the 3-point line.

After the game, we managed to catch up with Andersen in the VIP area, which gave us an opportunity to pick his brain on where he stands in terms of the NBA.

Andersen didn’t hesitate to indicate his interest in playing for the Atlanta Hawks, or any other team that might be interested in his services. He did seem a bit frustrated by the predicament he’s in, thought, with his NBA rights essentially being held hostage by the Atlanta Hawks.

“I just wish they would give me a straight answer either way. Every year it’s the same thing. If they want me, great, but if not, I would like to go play somewhere else. I can’t force the tender and go play on a non-guaranteed minimum contract, but I don’t think I’m asking for crazy money either.”

Andersen has another year on his deal with Barcelona, but has a clear NBA escape clause in his contract that that he can exercise until July 15th. That is a difficult situation for Barcelona, as they will be in serious limbo until that point—essentially the very tail end of the signing period for elite European clubs, where there will likely be few if any big men of Andersen’s caliber on the market. Barcelona has an option to buy out Andersen’s contract, and may be forced to do so if they feel like they cannot wait on the NBA to act.

What’s most unfortunate for Andersen is that he had already received assurances from former Hawks GM Billy Knight that they would bring him over to the NBA last summer, but that plan went to naught once he was fired and replaced by Rick Sund, who said he needed another year to evaluate him. The Hawks have apparently had multiple teams try to acquire Andersen in a trade, but have been reluctant to deal him for fear that he may make them look foolish in another team’s uniform. Based on the way Andersen has looked here in Berlin, that’s a legitimate possibility.

This situation really goes a long ways in emphasizing the challenges that players in Europe often face when being drafted by NBA teams in the second round, as they are essentially able to hold their rights perpetually without any recourse on the part of the players. This may be something that the NBA Players Association may want to look at in the upcoming Collective Bargaining Agreement, as it would probably be much more fair to put a three year limit in which teams can either sign their draft pick or be forced to relinquish their rights. Unfortunately the players that make up the union will likely have very little sympathy for the cause of European draftees who are essentially competing for their jobs.”

Clyde

June 13th, 2009
1:52 pm

RaJaH I don’t know how credible that article is but it sounds like something the Hawks would do.

Hoops

June 13th, 2009
2:40 pm

Is David Anderson a better player than Zaza? If not, trade his rights. If so, the Hawks need to bring him over and sign him. Zaza is going to command 6M. I’m sure we can sign Anderson for less than that.

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
2:55 pm

RaJah,

Yep, saw that article on DraftExpress.

But you do realize you just read something emminently evil, don’t you? Websites like that send virtual demon viruses that will eat away at your brain cells, destroying any basketball knowledge you have. You are at risk! Here’s the cure:

1.Throw half-full salt shaker over left shoulder (or is that the right one? I forget).

2.Retrieve salt shaker while mumbling “I rebuke the demons of sports journalism.”

3. Throw half-full salt shaker over right shoulder (or the opposite of the shoulder you threw it over the first time, whichever). No wait, check shaker to see if it’s still half full. If not, refill to halfway point. Remember to replace salt shaker top, or it will all spill out, then you have to start all over. Plus, by now one of the demons of ancient draftsite-ology will overcome you. Then you must perform an exorcism. See step 5 for that.

4. Say three Hail Marys backwards while turning six times in a counter-clockwise motion (or however many turns it takes to say the Hail Marys). If you don’t get the Hail Marys right, it’s okay. It’s all about the effort. Call your local beat writer and apologize for straying. There will be a small fee for absolution. You should now be cured. But no blogging for at least an hour.

5. In the event that an exorcism must be peformed, there are a few procedures to follow. First, refill the salt shaker and put it back where you got it from. Then clean up the spilled salt. Why? Because if you tell your wife or girlfriend that an ancient draftsite-ology demon infestation is the reason for the spilled salt everywhere, she may try to assist with the exorcism. Unfortunately, severe beatings have not been medically provent to help with all exorcisms, though it does seem to work for some. After cleaning up the salt, you must go to the blog site of your most hated pro basketball team and blog there for the next two days. This will drive the demon within you absolutley insane. Instant cure!

David Andersen

June 13th, 2009
2:57 pm

Zaza rebounds, mate. I shoot the 3 ball. Anymore questions? Sign me now that Buffoon Billy is no longer around.

RaJaH

June 13th, 2009
3:19 pm

LOL @ Big Ray!

O'brien

June 13th, 2009
3:21 pm

Hoops, I agree with Ray and AJ. We dont know if any of those PG will be better than Acie, and wings are easier to find. So I can see Sund going for the 7 footer, because if he develops, it will be a very nice chip for the Hawks.

RaJaH,

You never know what to believe with those articles. But I wish the Hawks would bring him over. He could be our backup PF coming off the bench, and he would be another bench scorer (so Flip wouldnt have to do it all).

Does anyone have any idea of what it might cost to bring David Andersen over?

cp

June 13th, 2009
4:49 pm

I don’t see Mullens being there at 19. I think he is impressing guys with his workouts. I said a few weeks ago he could be the Partick O’Bryant in this draft. A guy who didn’t really impress people that much in college but use their athletic abilities to wow scouts and gm’s in a workout such as Yi did two years ago. Its crazy how guys don’t like to work out against each other. They rather face a chair or shoot uncontested jumpers in front of the gm’s and coaches. I like the guys who challenge other players and want to face other guys. Its easy to look great in a gym alone shooting uncontested shots or dribbling when nobodies hounding you on defense. I’m sure a lot of guys would have gone lower in the draft if they faced guys during this process.

cp

June 13th, 2009
4:50 pm

O’brien that is one of the main issues with David Anderson. He wants to get paid. I forgot how much he was asking for last time but it was a lot for a guy who probably wont be starting here. I will see if I can find the article with him talking about how much he wanted a year.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 13th, 2009
5:37 pm

This Laker team would not win more than 1 game against any NBA Championship team from 1981-2008.

Overrated, overpaid, and poor quality teams in the NBA this year

Ed

June 13th, 2009
6:21 pm

One thing is for sure…either sign David Anderson or trade him. Makes absolutely no sense to not let him play in the NBA if he’s talented enough to do so. If other teams have no interest that is one thing, but it appears there is a market out there for him.

Another name to throw out there with the #19 pick, if he’s available, is Jeff Teague. I don’t think he will be but if you check him out he’s definitely the type of PG that would stand a chance of playing for Woody.

Big Ray

June 13th, 2009
7:09 pm

David Andersen is a hold-over from the Billy Knight era. For that reason, he may become another lost asset. Perhaps “never had” asset is more accurate. Kinda like Cenk Aykol, the Turkish pg we drafted, who never came over (is the guy even alive still?).

I don’t know what Andersen is asking price-wise, but he has to understand that he has yet to play a single NBA game. And we’ve all seen how European play doesn’t always translate to the NBA. We could probably use him, but I won’t lose sleep at night if we lose him altogether.

Ken Strickland

June 13th, 2009
8:24 pm

Even though I mentioned we should look at trading for PG KHinrick, I decided to look at other PG’s we might persue as options. After looking over those options, and realizing the best options aren’t likely available, I decided to compare ALaw’s overall stats with some of those options. But, before I got started I decided to compare his stats, on a prorated basis, to our own MBibby, and the results were amazing.

Bibby averaged 34.7MPG to Acie’s 10.2MPG, which is 3.4 times as many mins. So, I multiplied Acies PPG(2.9), APG(1.6), SPG(.20) and RPG(1.1)by the 3.4 factor. The results were BIBBY/ACIE 14.9/9.89PPG, 5/5.44APG, 1.24/.68SPG and 3.5/3.74RPG. This compares favorably with Bibby, who accumulated his totals playing 79 gms and averaging 34.7mins to Acie’s 55gms and 10.2mins.

Acies style of play would definitely get him to the freethrow line more than Bibby. Acie shot 60 freethrows in 55 gms and 10.2MINS, while Bibby shot 171 freethrows in 79 gms and 34.7mins. I can only believe Acie’s overall stats would increase playing Bibby’s mins and an increase in confidence.

Sund needs to step up to the plate and tell Woodson if he wants to continue as the Hawks HC, he’d better do a better job of developing young players and utilizing the talent he’s given. He has to be made to understand the organization can’t continue wasting draft picks and money on players he refuses to adequately develop and/or utilize just because of his old school hangups.

Rick Sund

June 13th, 2009
9:35 pm

I need another year to evaluate. Suckers!

Najeh Davenpoop

June 13th, 2009
10:48 pm

“This Laker team would not win more than 1 game against any NBA Championship team from 1981-2008.”

Completely, 100% agree with that statement… but I wouldn’t go as far as to conclude based on that that NBA teams this year are poor quality. I think it’s a combination of a few things: Houston and Boston would have likely advanced farther and knocked out the current finals teams if not for injuries, and like Bill Simmons said in a recent article many teams (the Cavs especially) had attractive trading chips which they probably would have used to upgrade their roster at the trading deadline but didn’t do so due to the economy. I think there are a lot of good teams in the NBA right now — more than there have been in a long time — but maybe not that one juggernaut team that there’s been in the past.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 13th, 2009
11:14 pm

Exactly, Najeh. I think last year’s Celtics were light years better than any team in the NBA this year. The Hawks I believe overachieved at home and to have us at the #4 seed is a bit high I think. Cleveland massively overachieved. I am really mad Kobe will get that ring, especially since we killed them at home this year and he didn’t even try in that game, plus Phil isn’t the most active coach out there but will get his 10th.

UGH

A Tribe Called Quest

June 13th, 2009
11:21 pm

Who writes these poll questions?

“If the Hawks don’t make it out of the 1st round next year, should Woodson be let go?”
That’s probably the most useless poll question I’ve ever seen here

CEAZ

June 14th, 2009
1:37 am

Perfect Offseason: Resign Pachulia, sign free agents Villaneuva and Jack, trade Horford and Williams with 2nd rd pk to Toronto for Bosh, trade Childress and Law for Camby, and draft Teague.
Starting Lineup; Camby, Bosh, Smith, Johnson, and Jack
Bench; Pachulia, Villaneuva, Evans, ? , and Teague
very well possible and would solidify them as contenders

niremetal

June 14th, 2009
2:04 am

I bet the Andersen article is accurate. When you see an article that directly quotes someone, you have a source to trace. That doesn’t set off my BS alarm (unless it seems REALLY far fetched). The time you’re really rolling the dice with those websites is when you see weasel words like “reportedly” and “it’s rumored that” without citing the source (be it a person or a newspaper). Directly quoting Andersen is probably accurate. It’s too risky to print quotes with someone’s name attached to it when you’re making it up, because you’re risking a lawsuit if you’re lying.

The DraftExpress guys certainly know their $hit when it comes to overseas and college prospects. They know prospects and interview them routinely – in other words, they know the players. The area where they’re freaking clueless is what the NBA front offices are thinking. The Andersen quotes don’t pretend to state the Hawks’ intentions towards Andersen; it just quotes Andersen as he was giving his thoughts on the Hawks. My BS alarm remains in snooze mode.

It went off a little with the next-to-last paragraph of RaJaH’s post, but in context I’m guessing their source for all that was Andersen himself. That being said, it’s in Andersen’s own interests to play up how interested other teams are in him, since that gives him more bargaining leverage. So I take THAT paragraph with a grain of salt. In any case, we shall see…

PS, Cenk Akyol? Still not looking too impressive. He isn’t getting many minutes, according to his stat pages on the Euroleague website and DraftExpress…

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
8:45 am

The way I figure it, NOBODY is supposed to know precisely ALL of what front offices are thinking (that goes for beat writers as well, since they are also media personnel). What DOES get leaked out is not easy to trace unless it’s a direct quote, because sources do not want to be cited or traced.

And that is another explanation (besides a lawsuit) for not citing a source. If somebody drops a bit of information to you on the promise that you won’t tell on them, the smart thing to do is to USE those so-called “weasel words”, rather than use direct quotes from your source (even if you don’t name them), whom you will most certainly lose as a source if he sees his own words in print anywhere.

That’s why on websites like HoopsHype, you see the section labeled as “Rumors.” Nobody is playing anything false here, and if you’re somebody who is taking all of this stuff too seriously…I really don’t know what to say. The rumor mill is all for the sake of circulating noise to talk about. Kinda like a blog…just something to talk about. After all, isn’t it possible that most people realize that something titled “rumors” or something to that effect, might actually be just…rumors? Again, it’s just something to talk about.

Some of us are bored to death with topics like JJ gets doubled and tripled, JJ is tired, JJ is asked to do too much, JJ needs somebody to play with, when are we going to extend JJ, JJ’s foot might be hurting, JJ is our best player, what’s JJ doing today, is JJ on Twitter, JJ, JJ, JJ, JJ, JJ, JJ, JJ, JJ, JJ….and JJ. Oh, and Woody sucks.

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
9:03 am

Got this from HoopsWorld. Of course, last I HEARD, Jason Fleming is full of $hit. Got that from the crew of BS Alarms Inc.

In this edition of the NBA At 2: What’s the market for Mike Bibby?…Mehmet Okur willing to stay in Utah for less money…Is there smoke with Van Gundy?…Upcoming HOOPSWORLD chats…2009 NBA Playoff Lines of the Day for Tuesday.

Bibby’s Market: Atlanta Hawks point guard Mike Bibby has been given a lot of credit for helping bring the Hawks from an underachieving squad to the second round of the NBA Playoffs, but he’s also an unrestricted free agent. The Hawks feel they are on the right path to get to the next level and All-Star guard Joe Johnson would prefer they not make changes.

“It happens in the NBA,” Johnson told Sekou Smith of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “Guys get shuffled around in this league. It’s a part of the profession we’re in.

“But I definitely think this group can get to that next level. We just have to get better individually and get better as a team.”

There is little question Bibby is probably more valuable to the Hawks than to other teams because of how much he has helped the team grow in the past season and a half. Like with Philadelphia 76ers free agent point guard Andre Miller, he will be facing a buyer’s market for his services. Today is Bibby’s 31st birthday so he probably still has a good 2-3 years of high quality play left in him. Given the Hawks alternatives at point guard aren’t that good – Acie Law hasn’t shown he is ready, free agency won’t yield them anything better, and a rookie won’t make an immediate impact – I’d expect Bibby to get his best offer from the Hawks.

He made a shade under $15 million this season though – that best offer isn’t going to touch that number. The Hawks would be smart to offer him something starting at around $7-8 million for four years, say $35 million total. That should be more than he can get anywhere else, and while it’s a pay cut it’s still the best he will be able to get.

I don’t know about some people, but I’m not thrilled with 7-8 million per year for 4 years. Not even for 3 years.

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
9:16 am

Uh-oh, here’s another one, and this one is by Travis Heath (BS Alarm Inc. rating unknown as of yet):

Fixing The Atlanta Hawks

By: Travis Heath Last Updated: 5/21/09 10:14 AM ET | 2083 times read

The Atlanta Hawks were irrelevant in the city of Atlanta and the NBA for nearly a decade until the 2007-08 season when the team finally made it back to the NBA Playoffs for the first time in nine seasons. The Hawks took another step forward in 2008-09, securing homecourt advantage in the postseason and advancing to the second round. Unfortunately for the Hawks, LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers were their reward. This led to a very quick second round exit.

All things considered, it was a good season for Atlanta. However, the Hawks have to make a number of decisions that will affect the long-term future of the franchise this summer.

What Went Wrong

After a strong start to the campaign winning their first six games, the team struggled to hang on to the fourth seed in the Eastern Conference Playoff picture by season’s end. The Hawks were inconsistent all season long. While they were a very solid home team winning 31 games, they struggled on the road winning just 16 times.

While 47 wins and an appearance in the second round of the NBA Playoffs wasn’t too shabby, no one made the mistake of calling Atlanta true title contenders. They were a good team in the East that likely would have been fighting for one of the two final playoff spots out West. (Liable to be labeled as BS).

Last summer, Josh Smith signed a five-year, $58 million offer sheet with the Memphis Grizzlies. The Hawks very quickly decided to match the offer for the young and very physically talented forward. All told, Smith’s production was down pretty much across the board this past season. He also missed a total of 13 regular season games. Perhaps most disturbing was the increasing frequency of the dustups between Smith and head coach Mike Woodson. The Hawks insisted these were no big deal, but they clearly indicated that Smith still has a lot of maturing to do should he want to live up to the big-money contract he signed prior to the season.

Acie Law was another player that was very disappointing for the Hawks this season. After selecting Law with the 11th overall pick in the 2007 NBA Draft, the Hawks were hoping Law would take a major step forward this season. That clearly didn’t happen. Instead, the Hawks are left pondering whether or not he even has a future in Atlanta.

View Travis Heath Archive What Went Right

The Hawks qualified for the second round of the NBA Playoffs for the first time since the 1997-98 season. The team’s 47 wins were 10 more than the Hawks won in 2007-08 and team’s highest total since Lenny Wilkens was running the show in Atlanta 11 seasons ago. Simply put, what fans saw this season in Atlanta was far-and-away the best basketball they have seen in over a decade.

Al Horford continued to show that he can be a dominant force around the basket both defensively and on the boards. He’s a solid offensive player but certainly still has room to improve in this area. Still, he looks to have all the makings of a legit double-double guy for the remainder of his career.

Joe Johnson qualified for his second consecutive All-Star Game last February in Phoenix and continues to be recognized by his peers as one of the most underrated perimeter players in the game. While many pundits anointed the Phoenix Suns the winner of the trade that sent Johnson to the Hawks and Boris Diaw and two future first round picks to the Suns back in August of 2005, it now appears like the Hawks may be getting the last laugh. (um, yeah because Phoenix has an even weaker front office..)

Finally, Ronald “Flip” Murray was a huge surprise for the Hawks off the bench this season. He was basically instant offense anytime Woodson put him in the game. Murray finished the season averaging over 12 points per game in just over 24 minutes of run.

Where The Hawks Go From Here

The Hawks have a total of eight players who will be free agents this summer including three of the team’s core pieces. Truth be told, the Hawks are feeling the financial pinch as much as any organization and the team’s ownership doesn’t appear to be interested in adding much additional salary this offseason. (Likely labled as BS if convenient)

Point guard Mike Bibby will be an unrestricted free agent looking to cash in with the final big contract of his career. Initial signs are that both Bibby and the Hawks would like to work something out, but it will ultimately depend on what kind of value Bibby ends up having on the open market. Forward Marvin Williams will be a restricted free agent. The Hawks are said to open to listening to potential sign-and-trade deals for him. Center Zaza Pachulia will also be an unrestricted free agent. (uh-oh! Holy Weasel Words, Batman! “are said to be” is an indication of absolute BS)

In addition to the names just mentioned, there have been rumblings that Atlanta is open to listening to offers for Josh Smith after his sub-par performance this season. However, given his talent and his youth, that would likely be a difficult decision for the Hawks to make. Don’t be surprised to see the Hawks dangle any number of players to other teams in much the same fashion the Denver Nuggets did with Marcus Camby last summer in an effort to help cut salary and acquire young talent and/or draft picks. (Holy crap, more weasel words! This is certainly BS!)

Should the Hawks indeed look to purge some of their existing players from the roster, it could be hard for the team to achieve the same level of success they did this past season. That said, it’s clear this group in Atlanta is not a championship-caliber team as currently constructed anyway, so perhaps bringing in some youth that will come with a cheaper price tag might end up being better for the long-term future of the franchise.

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
9:20 am

Hey, look what Jason Fleming said:

2005 FIRST ROUND PICKS – Restricted Free Agents

Marvin Williams, Atlanta Hawks – Without Marvin Williams the Hawks struggle, it’s as simple as that. He’s still a little raw, but he keeps improving. The thing is he and Josh Smith play very similar roles, playing the four spot without being true power forwards, and do you need to pay two of those guys on the same team? If Williams got the same deal as Smith that would mean a $4.3 million raise for him – but $10 million each seems like a bit much. Williams, in this writer’s opinion, is the better fit, so if they want to keep him they may explore trading Smith.

Huh. Well, I’ll be a son of a suck-egg mule…

Sautee

June 14th, 2009
9:55 am

Niremetal,

about this: “The area where they’re freaking clueless is what the NBA front offices are thinking.”

Got a source for that? :-)

Or should you let us know that it was conjecture on your part?

darrell starks

June 14th, 2009
10:00 am

Happy fathers day to everyone on here.
HAPPY FATHERS DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 14th, 2009
10:15 am

O MY BAD FATHERS DAY NEXT WEEK.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 14th, 2009
10:28 am

They say Shaq going to the Cavs will bring Cleveland over the hump vs. Orlando, but this is an invitation for disaster for Cleveland. I remember years back when Portland and Sacramento would think that 1 big move would bring them over the hump vs. LAL, then they forgot the rest of the conference (top echelon that is) was making big moves. In other words, Cleveland might fix their team for a matchup with Orlando by making this trade, but they will not improve their chances of beating a HEALTHY Boston team

terrell barron

June 14th, 2009
1:22 pm

My new Hawks offseason:
1.Sign Sessions or Jack
2.Go bpa at #19
3.Sign and trade Marvin to Portand for Prizbillia and a 2nd rdr
4.Trade Josh Smith and our 2nd rdr to Toronto for Bosh
5.Let Bibby, Zaza, and Solo walk
6.Re-sign Flip Murray
7.Bring back Chills
1st team: Sessions/JJ/Chills/Horford/Bosh
2nd team: Law/Flip/Mo/Hansborough/Prizbillia

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
1:46 pm

Hey! Nobody laughed at my stick-poking! Dadgummit, I’m gonna have to try harder….

Darrell Starks,

LOL! Hey, there’s nothing wrong with getting started early. But Happy Father’s Day to you in advance!

Sekou Smith

June 14th, 2009
1:59 pm

Tribe is right. Shaq to the Cavs would make things interesting but I don’t know that LeBron automatically wins the title because of it. Cleveland has to get something done immediately to win it with LeBron in uniform. There are no guarantees after the summer of 2010.

terrell barron

June 14th, 2009
2:04 pm

He’ll stay in Cleveland Sekou. It’s his hometown, and it gives him the best chance at a ring. The Knicks need a lot more than just LJ.

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
2:06 pm

They say Shaq going to the Cavs will bring Cleveland over the hump vs. Orlando, but this is an invitation for disaster for Cleveland. I remember years back when Portland and Sacramento would think that 1 big move would bring them over the hump vs. LAL, then they forgot the rest of the conference (top echelon that is) was making big moves. In other words, Cleveland might fix their team for a matchup with Orlando by making this trade, but they will not improve their chances of beating a HEALTHY Boston team.

My BS alarm is going off. Oh wait a minute, that’s just my watch. Nevermind…. :)

I heard this was also reported on ESPN radio. Is it BS if you HEARD it was reported, but weren’t actually LISTENING to the radio YOURSELF? I get so confused.

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
2:27 pm

Terrell,

I agree. Offense alone will not get it done, for one thing. If it was all that was necessary, D’Antoni would have won it all with Phoenix, who as as potent a squad as there was at the time (pre-Shaq days, that is).

Of course, New York also has Walsh as the GM, and he realizes that they can’t just run and gun everybody to death, or they risk simply becoming the Suns (or worse, the Warriors) of the East. Always a very attractive bridesmaid, but never a bride. New York definitely needs more then LBJ. Would they be able to sign another star of the vaunted 2010 free agent class? What would it cost them? Something like that my cost them valuable role players who can help a star-led team get over the top. Guys like Nate Robinson and David Lee…

O'brien

June 14th, 2009
2:49 pm

If Shaq does end up going to the Cavs, the point is Cleveland is not standing still and just waiting for their players to get better as a team and individually (as JJ put it). Moves have to be made. Don’t just resign everybody and hope they get better. Get some extra reinforcements.

Ray,

I agree with you. If we resign Bibby, I hope its not for more than 2 years. Because his defense and penetration skills are lacking as it is. Can you imagine 2 years from now?

I wonder what kind of market is out there for Bibby? As one blogger pointed out, I think he would be a good fit for Philly. With Elton Brand down low (and Eddie Jordan’s movement offense), Bibby should get some easy shots. And Brand and Dalembert play decent man defense, so that might help to compensate for his shortcomings.

Sautee

June 14th, 2009
2:51 pm

Hoops

June 14th, 2009
3:19 pm

Come on guys! My Papaw had a saying that fits the Hawks, “How long do you want to suck hind tit”? We have to make some changes this off season or we will finish no better than 5th next year in the East and JJ will walk!

I can’t believe we are going to resign Bibby! He was a great sign for us 1 1/2 years ago. Not now! We need a younger and more athletic PG that will play defense! Sessions is available and Acie needs to be given a chance as well.

Josh Smith can’t shoot a jump shot for crying out loud! That’s why he is always open! Horford plays inside and Josh can’t play out. Make this trade – Speedy & Josh for Bosh! Toronto would go for that trade! They know they will loose Bosh next summer. Why not get something for him?Why are we afraid to make a move?

Resign Flip, Marvin, and Zaza. Now we have a contender for the Finals! The Cavs are making plans for the Finals by getting Shaq. Why can’t we?

This lineup can be had for the same money that we are now spending:
PG-Sessions, Acie
SG-JJ, Flip
SF-Marvin, Evans
PF-Bosh, David Anderson
C-Horford, Zaza, Morris
Draft Pick-Mullens(if available), best player available, or Pendergraph

niremetal

June 14th, 2009
3:56 pm

I think y’all are missing the whole point of the BS alarm. The only BS-worthy thing you labeled above was the “are said to be” statement above. When someone is giving you opinion, then you know what you’re getting is their take on what might happen, and that it’s not necessarily based on anything more than their intuition and common sense. “Don’t be surprised if” is a preface to an opinion.

The “are said to be” statement, on the other hand, sets off my BS alarm. Who “said” that? The Hawks? Sekou? ESPN? ProBasketballNews? Some poster on Hawksquawk? If I had to guess, I’d say it was the latter-most, if any.

My test is pretty simple. If the statement is presented in terms that could serve as the basis for a defamation or libel suit, it should have a source – be it a primary source (e.g. Rick Sund) or a secondary source (e.g. Sekou, Reuters, etc). I won’t get into the requirements of defamation or libel, but “Don’t be surprised if” is an opinion statement, so it could not be defamatory. “Reportedly” and “person X is said to be” are fact statements, and therefore could be defamatory.

Of course, few people give a $hit enough about sports to file a defamation suit. But from my experience in the blogging world of sports and politics, I just find it a convenient tool to determine whether or not someone is starting a rumor instead of doing actual reporting.

Najeh Davenpoop

June 14th, 2009
4:42 pm

I don’t even think adding Shaq really solves Cleveland’s biggest problem with Orlando, which is that they can’t guard Turkoglu and Lewis at the same time. Yeah, Howard is way too athletic and strong for Ilgauskas and Varejao, but until he actually develops post moves, stopping him shouldn’t be Cleveland’s immediate concern over acquiring another athletic defensive-minded forward. I honestly think signing Trevor Ariza in free agency would make them much more dangerous to Orlando than trading for Shaq, and Ariza would be a hell of a lot cheaper too. Throw in Shaq’s recent injury history and I don’t think he alone will put them over the top.

O'brien

June 14th, 2009
5:18 pm

Najeh,

Shaq helps because then you can play Howard one on one, and Howard will have to defend Shaq on the other end. Let’s face it. Howard didnt have to play much defense against Ben Wallace, Varejao, and Big Z. And those guys did nothing to bother Howard. Shaq forces him to work more (on both ends).

That being said, I have become a Trevor Ariza fan (and some bloggers even prefer him over Marvin). I like his intensity (Marvin is too passive, and Ariza is the 4th or 5th option on that team as well). That being said, LeBron is a SF, and so is Trevor Ariza. I like your reasoning though. And thats why I would suggest Lamar Odom for Cleveland (although his inconsistency is frustrating). He is more versatile than Ariza, and he can play some PF.

Hoops,

I’m a Josh fan, but I’m a huge Hawks fan. I’m with you on the Bosh for Josh trade. I understand the risks (Josh is younger, more upside, cheaper), and Bosh is a free agent after next season. But if I’m the Hawks, I’m looking into it. I see no reason why Josh should be untradeable (or anybody else for that matter). Like Big Ray says. “As long as it makes the Hawks better, I’m all for it”.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 14th, 2009
5:25 pm

WTF I wrote a 3 paragraph long entry like 2 hours ago and it didn’t post?

Anyway, I was very impressed with what Tim Legler said on ESPN yesterday about SVG and Dwight. He said you NEVER double team anyone when you’re up 3 and there’s 20 seconds left.

More importantly, he was talking about how Dwight’s free throw hand formation is off, that he doesn’t extend the elbow. Also, he elaborated that Ewing never had a jumpshot till he worked on it and Dwight is only a back-to-the-basket player. Dwight has to learn how to hit a 12-footer from Ewing if he wants to become a more dominant and better all-around big man. Right on, Legler

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
5:33 pm

Holy crap, I really did not think that ANYBODY was taking the “BS Alarm” thing seriously, especially after what I thought was obvious humor-laden entries…

I was wrong yet again…

kwooden1

June 14th, 2009
5:39 pm

Hoops, I really like JS’s energy and effort but I would go for the Bosh trade. But I honestly don’t think it would happen. If Toronto does that trade, they will be telling their fans that next season means nothing. They would be stuck with some kind of a line-up like Evans (C), Smith (PF) and Bargnani (SF). They would lose all their inside scoring, while not addressing their defensive issues at all! Besides that, their front office would look pathetic for not even trying to keep Bosh. The longer I look at this off-season the less options I really see that we have.

terrell b, I was on the Prizbillia bandwagon not to long after the HAWKS season ended, but from what everyone has said on the blog I don’t think it would ever happen. Portland can’t afford to lose him because Oden is to injury prone.

I really think a good summer for the HAWKS would be:
1) Resigning Bibby,Flip and Solo (Total of 12M/yr)
2) Let Zaza walk
3) Wait out Marvin, match anything below (9M/per)
4) Sign and Trade Speedy + Evans for Mo Pete
5) Sign Gerald Green with the rest of our Mid-Level Exception
6) Draft Tyler H.

I don’t think this solves any of our problems, but I guess I will keep my fantasy trades to myself. (Josh Smith for Lebron James sounds good in my mind!!) My only hope for next year is Josh Smith, Marvin Williams and Al Horford take substantial steps forward. The HAWKS were top 8 in the league this year and have a lot of room for growth with their core players. They have good chemistry, if they keep Bibby. Minor offensive philosophy changes along with improved games from Smith and Horford, would immediately help this team compete better with the elite teams in the league. I’m not certain at all that the HAWKS coach will change his ways or Horford/Smith will get any better, but I can just hope.

GO HAWKS!!!

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
5:48 pm

Hoops,

Again, I’m just fine with that trade. We’d have to work out the details concerning the extra pieces, but I’m definitely a go with that trade. I don’t know how good the chances are of it happening. Toronto letting go of Bosh is sort of like us letting go of JJ, only worse for them than for us (were we to give up JJ). Reason being, we have other pieces and weapons that can be utilized and built around, even if none of them is currently as good as JJ. The only person who comes even REMOTELY close to Bosh in Toronto is Bargnani, and that’s not a fair comparison either. Meanwhile, Calderon is a good pg, but not someone to build around.

Najeh,

I agree. Cleveland could be making a mistake along the lines of the one Phoenix made, only Shaq fits Cleveland’s style better than he did/does Phoenix’s style. And you’re doubly right about the key to beating Orlando being the ability to guard both Lewis and Turkoglu simultaneously. I’ve always felt that way about them, because as good as Howard is, he doesn’t beat you by himself, and isn’t quite as dominant yet as Shaq was in his younger days. But he’s getting there, and quick. He’ll develop that jumper, I’m sure.

Here’s the deal: I think Orlando will have trouble retaining Turkoglu, and recovering from losing him would be difficult. Of course, they could go after somebody like Marvin Williams through S&T, as Niremetal has suggested.

O’brien,

I agree that the problem lies in Cleveland’s forward situation more than it does at center. They really need an upgrade at power forward. If Orlando DOES manage to retain Turkoglu, then the problem remains how to guard him and Lewis simultaneously. Varejao helps, but if he starts in the frontcourt, then you can’t bring him off the bench, where you really need him (and all you have left is Joe Smith, who can’t guard either Orlando forward). Plus, Varejao is limited offensively. Big Z is getting older. Hickson isn’t ready, and may never be the PF they need, while Lebron is clearly a lock at SF.

Shaq may indeed not be the answer, but he does give options at the center spot. Unfortunately, he can’t play any more minutes than Z can. The Cavs would have to make another move along with the Shaq move, but could they afford to after acquiring him?

As for Bibby, I don’t want him for more than 2 years (and that’s assuming we do some serious grooming of a young pg with decent minutes while he’s here). But I don’t know what his market is like elsewhere. It’s entirely possible that he stands to make the most money here, but that’s not a guarantee. Is he seeking more money per year, or more years on a contract? Does he want to get on with a contender? Hard to say, but him coming back here is just not an absolute given.

Big Ray

June 14th, 2009
5:52 pm

Kwooden1,

I agree. If no big moves are made, so much depends on our younger core players coming back better than before. And that has to be perfectly aligned with our head coach taking advantage of that, and not running everything for and through the backcourt. Of course, that’s a two-edged blade. If their roled are expanded and less pressure is put on JJ to score (and he plays less minutes), then if he doesn’t do well (or better), the “tired” and “asked to do too much” mantras are no longer there. And we just can’t have THAT…

Sautee

June 14th, 2009
6:43 pm

This is for all who propose some kind of Josh for Bosh deal:

Can any of you say that it definitely WOULDN’T be a one year rental?

And IF that’s how it ended up, would anyone here think that a one year rental of Bosh would be WORTH trading our second best player at the age of 23?

If I knew beyond all doubt that we could re-sign Bosh, I’d do that trade today.

But if Bosh flew the coop to go play, say with LeBron and Brook Lopez for Jay-Z, well, that’s a different story, eh? And what a frontcourt THAT would be.

Tough, tough call without any assurance of losing a big asset. And I can’t fathom that we’d win the title with Bosh, but stranger things have happened. We’d certainly be closer than we were this year.

So, the question is: If Bosh were a one year rental only, is it worth it to trade Josh?

O'brien

June 14th, 2009
6:50 pm

Ray,

If Toronto holds on to Bosh, and then he walks next season, what do they tell their fans? Sure, they’ll have cap space, but which big name free agent is going to sign with Toronto? And I dont see Bosh staying in Toronto.

Josh is an exciting player, and I think the Toronto fans would understand, based on his potential and his salary, and the strong possibility of Bosh walking (he refused to sign an extension). Plus if Speedy is the other piece, his contract would be expiring, so they still have some cap room next season.

Melvin

June 14th, 2009
7:01 pm

Sautee,

I think the Josh for Bosh thing has been blown way out of propotions on this blog. It has been mention so much until I think folks really think the deal is on the table…

Astro Joe

June 14th, 2009
8:29 pm

I agree that Cleveland had a bigger problem defending the 3 than they did the post. At the same time, you really can’t adjust your roster to defend Rashard and Hedu and then use that same set of defenders aginst KG and Pierce. I wonder if they could convince Shawn Marion to take the MLE. He and LeBron could certainly defend the Magic tandem.

Melvin

June 14th, 2009
8:31 pm

Sund,

Here’s some free draft advise. Please do not pick Wayne Ellington. I scouted him and he leaves much to desire…If you are going to pick a Tarheel then it should be Lawson only.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvFzGlVkLqc&feature=PlayList&p=F916CE7D0BB19C04&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=22

Sautee

June 14th, 2009
8:35 pm

Niremetal,

About this:

“If the statement is presented in terms that could serve as the basis for a defamation or libel suit, it should have a source – be it a primary source (e.g. Rick Sund) or a secondary source (e.g. Sekou, Reuters, etc).”

OK, Fair enough, and good job explaining why YOU need a BS alarm.

Is this a potentially defamatory statement? “The area where they’re freaking clueless is what the NBA front offices are thinking.”

Are you not “defaming” the DraftExpress site with a specious claim? Or do you have a source? Or “proof” that they are “freaking clueless”.

Or if it’s your OPINION that they are “freaking clueless” shouldn’t you have told us it was your opinion? You made it as a statement of fact. Can you explain?

Blast

June 14th, 2009
9:01 pm

Down by 9? It’s slipping away from the Magic.

TskOoOo

June 14th, 2009
9:04 pm

Big Ray, it’s not that we don’t find your BS Alarm thing funny.

It’s that we don’t find you funny.

Markson

June 14th, 2009
9:14 pm

KOBE = ADULTERER, RAPIST, ARROGANT, WHINER, SABOTAGER.

HE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE
HE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE
HE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE
HE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE
HE CHEATED ON HIS WIFE

The back of TskOoOo's mind

June 14th, 2009
9:16 pm

Let’s see, I haven’t posted in a while, and I want to get attention…….

I know, I’ll slam Big Ray and everybody will think I’m soooooo cool.

HawkKingBibby

June 14th, 2009
9:24 pm

HAHAHAHAAA I KNOW WHO YOUR FILL IN THE BLANK PG IS SEKOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its Rafer Alston. I wonder if Speedy and 19 gets it done?

Najeh Davenpoop

June 14th, 2009
9:31 pm

“That being said, I have become a Trevor Ariza fan (and some bloggers even prefer him over Marvin).”

I know you didn’t present this as your own opinion, so don’t take this as a personal response, but I think if Marvin was in a well-defined, limited role like Ariza, he would be just as effective. It goes back to one of my biggest criticisms of Woody, that nobody in the front court is given a defined role in the offense. Don’t get me wrong — Ariza has really impressed me in this postseason and I think he would be able to give any contending team 25-30 quality minutes per game, either as a starter or off the bench. But a big part of that comes from the fact that the system calls for him to do two or three specific things (spot-up 3-point shooting, disrupting passing lanes, and man-to-man defense) that he’s really good at doing, while limiting the situations in which he would have to do other things. Constantly being put in a spot where he can utilize his strengths also means his confidence skyrockets and he becomes more aggressive.

When I suggested Ariza for the Cavs, I pictured him coming off the bench as part of a small lineup in which LeBron would be guarding the other team’s PF, when the Cavs played teams like the Magic (or the Hawks for that matter) with non-traditional PFs. Considering his spot-up shooting ability, he could also contribute some minutes at the 2. But no doubt, Lamar Odom or Shawn Marion could address their inability to guard the Magic front court as well. Like Astro Joe said, though, Ariza wouldn’t help them defend more traditional lineups like Boston unless they were willing to play LeBron extended minutes at power forward, and although he’s probably strong enough and athletic enough to guard the Garnetts of the league, it probably wouldn’t be the smartest way to use him.

“I think Orlando will have trouble retaining Turkoglu, and recovering from losing him would be difficult.”

The way their system is set up, it would be damn near impossible to recover from that, since everything runs through Turkoglu offensively. Who knows if a healthy Jameer Nelson would take over the offense-initiating responsibilities (side note: I think Nelson is a little overrated) but they would have to seriously reconfigure their offense to compensate for potentially losing Turkoglu. Really, if salaries are not taken into account, the Magic should get rid of Lewis before they lose Turkoglu, but Lewis’ immovable contract won’t allow that to happen. The criticism of Magic GM Otis Smith over the Lewis contract has decreased a little this year, but if that results in Turkoglu leaving, he’s going to look like a complete fool.

Melvin

June 14th, 2009
10:20 pm

I wonder if the Hawks get Woodson one of those Phil Jackson big chairs would that improve his coaching ability. At the least, he could sit down with his arms folded…

Astro Joe

June 14th, 2009
10:22 pm

Magic won’t finish this game with 90 points. I agree with the previously stated sentiment that neither of these teams are historically elite. But the same was true for the Heat team that won it a few years ago. And it doesn’t make the trophy any less gold or the moment any less thrilling for the Lakers. And I’m happy for Kobe.

Blast

June 14th, 2009
10:29 pm

Listen to the ESPN crew gush over Kobe once they knew LA will win the trophy.

Magic screwed up on this one. They could have won a championship this year.

Astro Joe

June 14th, 2009
10:31 pm

OK, I lied, they will score 90.

Melvin

June 14th, 2009
10:35 pm

The one bright side to the season coming to an end tonight. No more of those stupid Kobe and Lebron puppet commericals. The Kobe/Lebron puppet concept has got to be one of Nike worst marketing ideas..

Astro Joe

June 14th, 2009
10:41 pm

I can’t freakin’ believe that Adam Morrison has a championship and Barkley, Malone, Ewing, Stockton…

A Thinking Fan

June 14th, 2009
10:46 pm

The problem with D. Howard is he trying to be the “Second Coming!” He needs to realize he is not at SACA no more and learn his trade. We don’t care if he doesn’t cuss! Play ball “Big Fella” play ball…

G-Man

June 14th, 2009
10:54 pm

Melvin, Dont be surprised if you see a kobe puppet commercial rubbing lebron’s face into winning another ring.

Blast

June 14th, 2009
10:58 pm

Well, Kobe got one without Shak. Good for him. But Magic played really dumb in the finals. Turnovers, bad free throws did them in. They will learn from this series. I hope.

Halsey

June 14th, 2009
11:05 pm

I’m not sure drafting Shelden Williams at pick 5 or passing on Chris Paul was the worst thing Billy Knight did to the Hawks. It sure would be nice if the Hawks could take back the Pau Gasol for Shareef Abdur Rahim trade. :(

Astro Joe

June 14th, 2009
11:09 pm

Shaq averaged around 12 points in the Finals when the Heat beat the Mavs. That was undoubtedly Wade’s team.

The crazy thing about Kobe is how well he is playing in like his 13th year in the league. And it’s not about being a high school player, it’s about being a fierce competitor who takes care of his body and works hard at improving every year.

Since Magic/Bird entered the NBA, my top 5 are:

1 – MJ
2 – Magic
3 – Bird
4 – Kobe
5 – Duncan

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
12:45 am

Sautee,

Contextually, you can tell that when I said “The area where they’re freaking clueless” was my opinion rather than an attempted statement of fact. It couldn’t serve as the basis for a defamation suit.

Do you really want me to give you a dissertation on the law of defamation? Because I’d be glad to. Have to learn it for the bar anyway.

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
1:00 am

Also, I’m some fool posting on a blog. If someone ever gives me a podium like HoopsWorld or DraftExpress, I’d be much more circumspect about what I say. How much publicity a statement gets is also a key component of the law governing defamation.

As I said, I could go on all day with this. Or you could just stop with the needling, agree to disagree with my basis for calling BS, and move on. I made it clear that this was my system for calling BS. Feel free to create your own. But let me know if you want me to copy the whole Conviser Mini Review section on defamation and give you my analysis.

Astro Joe,

Astro,

Fun as it is, I hate ranking players across eras, even though I like that you limited your list to the post-Magic/Bird . I also hate ranking guys who play different positions. But I’ve had many a debate on whether Magic or MJ is the tops. I gotta give the edge to the guy who can dominate 5 positions over the guy who can REALLY dominate 2.

It also depends on how you view it, obviously. If I had to pick a winner of a 1-on-1 tournament, I’d pick MJ over everyone. If it were a fantasy draft where I could pick each player in their prime for a season, I’d take Magic because of his aforementioned versatility. I’d actually pick Duncan over MJ too, simply because he changes the way the other team plays on the defensive end even more than Michael did – that’s just what happens when you have an athletic, brilliant 6′11 guy standing underneath the hoop. But it’s just so tough to say, because no one can say for certain how Michael would have performed today (or how he would have performed without the consummate superstar teammate alongside him) or how Duncan would have performed 15-20 years ago.

Incidentally, I think LeBron might eventually make everything I just said moot if he reaches his full potential. But he needs a Pippen or a Kareem before we can even attempt to compare him to MJ or Magic, I think.

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
1:18 am

And PS, Sautee:

I dunno why you get such a perverse pleasure out of picking apart my words and throwing them back at me, but I’m done with it. If you want to argue about something basketball-related, I’m happy to. But I’m done with arguing over my methodologies and not-always-carefully-chosen words that I use when posting on a blog that’s supposed to be for fun. I really am done this time after this post, on my “BS alarm” topic or any other “How niremetal views the world” topic. So if you want to continue this argument (or any other like it), have a good time talking to yourself.

[...] a deal done with him last summer I don

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
7:37 am

Astro Joe,

You know how it is. There’s always some lucky scab who gets a ring, and did absolutely NOTHING to earn it. So Morrison gets a ring, and he should be thanking the Bobcats for it. Meanwhile Radmanovich is cursing Mitch Kupchak…

Niremetal,

MJ was playing alongside an all-star/superstar SG/SF, but he was also one of the very few backcourt players to dominate the game FROM the backcourt for several years in a row, to include winning titles, WITHOUT a dominant or even notable big man. To me, that is one of the things that makes him unique. Realistically, with the exception of one of the greates role players ever in Dennis Rodman, all MJ ever had was Pippen. No other teammate, not really even Ron Harper or Horace Grant, was much more than a side-bar role player, though both of the aforementioned players were decent players. Again, MJ dominated the entire game from the 2-spot, with no big man that was anywhere close to dominant. Can’t name another who did that offhand, and even Kobe and Wade can’t claim such a thing. While Gasol isn’t as dominant as Shaq, he’s an all-star and a threat that has proven difficult for any team to stop (and really…who’s stopped him in the last few years? Nobody..), and he’s the reason why Kobe and the Lakers have made it to the Finals two years in a row.

Can’t argue with the comments on Magic Johnson, as he was a unique player all to himself, and even Lebron is not like him.

As for Duncan, he’s one of the best big men in the business, to ever hit the court. He’s even better than the guy he eventually replaced, and probably the best team leader I’ve seen at his position (his cerebral ability and versatility put him over Shaq, who dominated by having the athleticism to match his “bigger and stronger than everybody else” frame).

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
7:40 am

Melvin,

Your 10:20 post had me laughing like hell. As for the Bosh/Josh trade, I don’t know if anybody really believes it’s on the table, but it certainly seems to be the most popular one for the moment, doesn’t it?

Eric

June 15th, 2009
8:32 am

Funny watching Phil Jackson after games just give a cold handshake and not even talk to the other coach.

Guess that’s what happens when you’re “the greatest of all time”

Astro Joe

June 15th, 2009
9:32 am

nire, if MJ were playing in today’s NBA, he may have never learned how to shoot the 3-ball, because without hand-checking, he would be able to get to the rim each and every possession. If we think Wade gets a lot of free throw attempts, I can’t even imagine what would happen for Jordan. They would probably have to change the rules (again), because watching MJ shoot 20 free throws a game would kill TV ratings and attendance.

I agree that it is challenging to compare players across eras and positions. But so what, we’re not debating personal freedoms as defined (or not) in the Constitution. It’s basketball. Not everything requires the same level of precision, fact and precedent. Again, it’s basketball.

Adam Morrison has a ring? It’s going to take me a while to get over that one.

ILL-logical

June 15th, 2009
9:51 am

The lesson learned from this serise is that big is back and bigger is better.
The inside outside play of both teams,although the Lakers bigs as a gruop were better, and the rumored Shaq to the Cavs deal places a premium on big men that has to give the Hawks “braintrust ” some concern. Especially with their stated goal to model the franchise after the 2003-4 Pistons.

Me,I just can’t see Al succesfully going up against the Howards,Shaqs and Perkins on a regular basis and the Hawks winning these contests.
And I don’t see how adding either Bosh or Amare helps since neither of them is a center or over 6′10” and 250 lbs, roughly Al’s size.

Well congratulations to the champs and here’s hoping someone somewhere has some clue as to where this franchise is going.

dap01

June 15th, 2009
10:10 am

SEKOU: Do you think that the Hawks will be able to use the “Speedy Contract” in anyway this off season? What are the possibilities?

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
10:18 am

I’m a fan of Josh Smith. And to be honest if it would benefit him to be in another system besides this one, then I’m happy for him. But everyone who is saying Josh for Bosh, needs to remember Toronto already has Josh Smith playing for them. His name is Marion. There’s no reason for them to make a trade to get the same exact player they already have. Especially when they could at least trade him to the west and not see him so much during the season.

Also don’t forget interior defense was one of the Hawks biggest problems. And Smoove is STILL a better defender than Bosh. Bosh comes here, and someone gets injured for the season, then you still lose him and JJ (who wants to go to NY hands down). What do you gain then besides looking at the balls bounce around in the lottery for another 4-5 years?

Astro Joe

June 15th, 2009
10:18 am

ILL, big men and role players. Ariza, Odom and Fisher each had significant moments in the series to supplement the consistent performance of Kobe and Pau. But I wouldn’t sweat the big man ting if I were the Hawks. I’d be more worried about teams like Philly, Washington & Chicago. I think next season, we will see an increase in scoring amongst East Conference teams. There are only a few true bigs in this league, but what we will more likely see is teams loading up on shooters (like Orlando) and looking to combine strong defense with above average shooters. That combination is much easier to piece together than finding guys like Howard and Gasol.

Melvin

June 15th, 2009
10:20 am

Astor,Ray,Nire

Did you all catch Magic comment after the game. He said “Gasol is arguably the most skill big men in the game next to KG”. I almost fell out of my chair. Put both of their rings together and Duncan still has more. Heck, you add Rasheed in there as well and Duncan still trumps them all. I like Magic and no knock against the other 3 players (well, maybe somebody needs to knock Rasheed upside the head, heh) but they don’t come close to Duncan as he ate them all for lunch on his title runs… Hmmm, I got a feeling that Duncan heard Magic statement and I would be surprise if we see the Spurs back in the finals in 2010…

Oh yeah Ray, I think KG made Gasol look pretty bad in the finals last year and I believe had he not been hurt this season, that title could have stayed in beantown….

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
10:24 am

ILL, exactly right.

After thinking the situation over again, if the Cavs are only giving up Ben Wallace (LOL) and Pavlovic (who?) for Shaq, they will automatically be in the ECF next year. Maybe Shaq will get in shape now that he and Kobe are battling for their 4th ring.

Shaq + LeBron vs. Kobe in the 2010 finals?

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
10:27 am

On the flipside, if the Suns trade Shaq for 2 now-scrubs, how many fans will they have left? If Nash is traded for Rondo and Amare is unhappy/dealt, this team will take years to recover

Astro Joe

June 15th, 2009
10:43 am

Let’s be real. If Shaq goes to the Cavs and they end up playing Lakers in the Finals, Shaq will be going up against FISHER for the 5th ring. Because both Shaq and Fisher would be complementary players. Shaq and Kobe are not close to being on the same performance level these days. The headline would be LeBron going for his first and Kobe for his 5th and Shaq and Fisher would be sub-plots.

Sope Creek

June 15th, 2009
10:53 am

Just for a little perspective, Pau Gasol was the guy the Hawks took at #2 in order to effect a trade with Memphis to get Sharif Abdur-Raheem. The Lakers’ big man more than offset Dwight in the finals this year, and to me that just provides all that much more impetus for the Hawks to continue to build this team through drafting and developing players rather than trading those picks for players whose worth is already maxxed out or waning.

I have no problem with adding role pieces through highly selective free agent signings, such as the additions of Flip and Mo this year. But I’d hate to give up the Hawks’ future in favor of a compromised present.

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
11:04 am

Sope, I totally agree. Everyone talks about the Hawks passing up CP3 and Roy. But don’t they know the draft is/ and will always be a gamble no matter the prospect. I mean if you look back Kenyon Martin (although different years) WAS the lottery in his draft. And he still ended up being a complimentary player. And let us not even say Olowokandi’s name. Or better yet how crazy do people think the Hornets must feel when they remember they were the team who drafted Kobe? Its easy to say if you had CP3, Deron, Roy or Rondo your team will be this or that. But at the same time did THIS team not make it further than all of those guys? I don’t know any GM who had 4-5 straight good drafts. I mean look at Jerry Krause, he won 6 rings, and still got ran out of town because of draft picks when it was a consensus that those the Baby Bulls were the best in the draft.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
11:05 am

Melvin,

Good points. KG outplayed Gasol, he didn’t stop him. For a soft guy, dude sure gets a lot of rebounds. I think what hurt Gasol and Odom last year was the fact that when KG and Perkins were out, they then had to deal with a very energetic tandem of Big Baby and Leon Powe. Both guys are more physical than even KG. But you’re right, KG got the better of that battle. No two ways about it. Gasol is just hard to deal with on offense, due to his level of finesse/skill.

And you’re right about Duncan. He trumps ‘em all. Definitely the most skilled. Shaq wouldn’t have dominated if he wasn’t simply bigger than anybody else. It wasn’t that he was more athletic than anybody else. Just a lot bigger/heavier/stronger. And no way could he actually LEAD a team like Duncan does. But that’s just my opinion.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
11:09 am

Ramon,

When you desperately need a pg, and you decide to instead draft something that you already have a young version of, that’s just nuts. I mean, we were talking about NEEDS, not just “best available talent.” But I understand your point about Olowakandi and all the rest.

As for comparing how Roy, CP3, and Deron have fared in comparison to this team, can you say that we progressed to where we did because of the guys we picked INSTEAD of them? No, you cannot. Furthermore, you also have to examine the players they have around them, and the path they took in the playoffs. Do we make it to the 2nd round of the playoffs if we played the teams that Utah and Portland played in the first round? Would we even make the playoffs with the kind of roster New Orleans has? No, no, and no. It seems like apples to apples, but it’s not.

Melvin

June 15th, 2009
11:16 am

Ray,

I think Gasol gets all those rebounds b/c he’s the only guy that I know(or capable) that could touch his knee caps without benting over (super length)…lol

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
11:20 am

It is apples and apples. Because if we had either one of those players we wouldn’t have had Horford, we still wouldn’t have Childress, because all three would’ve been signing max contracts. They still would’ve ended up being on the bench with Lorenzo pulling popcorn out of their hair. You look at last year’s Celtics, this year’s Lakers and Magics. All of those team had wings that can play 2-4 if needed. And they also had good interior defense. Its easier to find a veteran serviceable point guard than it is to find good interior defense and athletic wings. Would Chris Paul have been even close to this good if he was drafted and coach by Minnesota? The entire point is that if you drafted those players, you wouldn’t have THIS team. So you still may wouldn’t be any better (chances are). And I would take the Hawks over Portland, NO, and Utah in a 7 game series. That’s just me though.

Sautee

June 15th, 2009
11:23 am

Nire,

You said this: “Contextually, you can tell that when I said “The area where they’re freaking clueless” was my opinion rather than an attempted statement of fact.”

Actually, I COULDN’T tell, but I’m satisfied at your admission of opinion.

And then you said this: “Also, I’m some fool posting on a blog. If someone ever gives me a podium like HoopsWorld or DraftExpress, I’d be much more circumspect about what I say.”

Exactly. Some fool posting on a blog. As we ALL are. And as such, our words can be argued. YOU were the one demanding “source that” to other bloggers here. That’s OK, but you set yourself up for others throwing your own words back. If you don’t WANT to be more circumspect with your words on the blog, then don’t be surprised when they come back to haunt you. That’s YOUR decision, man. Don’t put that on me. It’s not like I’m the only one here who takes what you say to task.

And then this: “But I’m done with arguing over my methodologies and not-always-carefully-chosen words that I use when posting on a blog that’s supposed to be for fun.”

Well, first off thanks for admitting your use of “not-always-carefully-chosen words”, since THAT has been the thing that drove many of my responses.

As I recall, YOU were the one trying to dismiss my argument for comparing JJ with the 5 closest in salary by arguing that MY methodology was incomplete. At THAT point, were you not “throwing my words” back at me?

Pot calling kettle. Perhaps if you want the blog to be more fun, then start choosing your words more carefully. That was my ENTIRE point – your carelessness with words. Which seems to me a curious thing for an almost lawyer, but hey, apparently you can compartmentalize WHEN to be circumspect and I’m sure that’s a valuable thing in the legal world.

Melvin

June 15th, 2009
11:29 am

Ray,

You’re right. I believe when you have a glaring need and have one of the top 5 picks then you should draft to address that need. Hawks needed a PG at the time they drafted Marvin. However, I do understand the philosophy of drafting a can’t missed (or franchise) player (which some thought Marvin was) but that shouldn’t be confuse with the best player available philosophy which is normally used during the mid to later positions of the draft.

SNARF: The SMARMY SNARK

June 15th, 2009
11:36 am

F%$#ck Chris Bosh!!!! IS he a center? I love you guys and your educated analysis of our team, so it baffles me when you guys cry for soft, craky kneed former all-star PF’s like Bosh. I KNOW you guys have more sense than this.

You guys are the brightest of the blogging world, so i’m sure you won’t disagree with my idea that we need to get Rahseed. He may have lost a step or two but he’s certainly no softer than Pau Gasol. Actually, when has sheed EVER been called soft on the defensive end? Any scoring he does will be a bonus, we just need an anchor. We won 47 games DESPITE being out reboundede in almost EVERY GAME WE WON. That’s just hustle so you can’t blame J-Smoove and Al for being outrebounded(back in febuary) by the lakers when their giving up 5-6 inches.

If you want to trade for a Big, you’r going to have to give up talent. We can’t afford to do that. We just need to sign Rasheed. It’s simple. Eventually we will come across a steal in the form of a young and talneted CENTER, but for now just sign Rasheed. Woodson likes vets and he has former ties to Rasheed.

And don’t give me that immaturatity crap. We have high-character guys on our squad who want to win. He will fall in line behind our “”all action-no words” superstar Joe Johnson. Their job is to win ball games. If yor’re worried about character issues after you’ve watched our team over the past two seasons, then YOU need to grow up.

Re-Sign Marvin,Draft Wayne Ellington, Draft Danny Green, Re-sign Solo, Re-Sign Bibby and/or Flip(or sign Anthony Parker…..though I think he’s like 33), fill the bench out with guys like Gerald Green, Mario West, Pray Acie get’s his Sh$@!t together AND LETS WIN WIN WIN GOOOOOO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
11:50 am

This guy Snarfs know what he’s talkin’ about. Couldn’t have said it better myself…….yup ;-)

I think we should stick with Acie. If you compare him with the guys PG’s the draft, what do they have on him. This is Woodys fault……if we play acie next season and he shows that he really is a scard llittle kid on the big stage with grown men, then we can trade him b4 the deadline for another PG with a little more moxi.

I’d much rather use those picks to support JJ and lighten his load a little, offensively and defensively(Ellington and Green)

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
11:52 am

Besides, there is no guarentee that JJ will be back after this 09-10 season

darrell starks

June 15th, 2009
12:14 pm

Smart snark i dont understand your analogy about bosh but any way we do not need any retread player like rasheed.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 15th, 2009
12:24 pm

Rick sund make the trade for bosh marvin horford and the 19pick and build this team around joe josh bosh and bring back chill.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
12:28 pm

Darrell with that team you STILL need someone to defend the center position. And you STILL need someone to be able to stay in front of the other teams point guard. It does no good to have a roster that can score 100 points per game, if your defense giving up 103 a game. And that line up still leaves the team with holes defensively, just more people in the stands to watch Rondo, Rose, Arenas, Nelson, Duhon, Harris, and other’s skip to the lane.

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
12:30 pm

Snarf, I love the idea of Rasheed. He will be the one to actually teach our bigs how to play post defense. Also a big like him who can shoots, allows Josh to be able to be on the block. With he, Smoove, and Horford I would LOVE the swag that the front line would possess. All three of them aren’t scared to knock someone out if they’re skipping to the lane. Believe it or not that goes a long way in the playoffs. Another thing about Rasheed that is over looked is even though he’s older, he still doesn’t miss many games.

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
12:47 pm

Mel/Ray,

If a franchise player is available, do you turn him down because you have a greater need somewhere else? Because let’s not forget, the project for Marvin was that he was a future superstar. I wish NBADraft.net’s profile of him was still up, because they made it sound like he was the next Grant Hill (circa 1997). DraftExpress’s profile of him is still up, and it’s glowing too.

I have no problem admitting that we should have taken Deron or CP3 in hindsight. But every GM in the league would have picked Marvin at #2 that year, and more than a couple probably would have picked him at #1. I agree that you go after need if all other things are roughly equal, but the conventional wisdom in the early summer of 2005 was that Marvin was a franchise player and that CP3/Deron were merely very good.

Here’s the money quote from that linked article, in my view:
“If Williams is not picked first overall by Milwaukee, Atlanta could entertain trade offers for the No. 2 pick, but that would affect Williams’ destination, not his draft position.”

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
12:56 pm

Astro Joe, are you serious?

Did you watch Shaq play at all this year? Shaq is still a top 5 center and can score at will and out-muscle any other player in this league.

And I still can’t believe Kobe gets away with those dirty elbows that the refs don’t call anymore.
Adulterer.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
1:06 pm

Ramon,

I love my Hawks, but I don’t take them over Utah or Portland in a 7 game series. New Orleans, yes. Utah and Portland? No. Not right now. We are too inconsistent. It’s why Miami took us to 7 games…

cp

June 15th, 2009
1:09 pm

How can you complain about us being out rebounded then bring up getting Rasheed? With all his talents he is a poor rebounder. A lot of us complained about Josh’s rebounding this past year but he still was a better rebounder than Rasheed. Sheed also said he wants 8 million a year. I think we pass on Sheed. He would rather play on the perimeter than bang down low. And Sheed takes a lot of plays off. Watching some Detroit games this past season it was times when he was on the court where he looked like he did not even care. I don’t think we need that type of attitude here. Guys always complain about Josh so I wonder would they be mad at Sheed when he is launching jumpers, not rebounding, and acting like he would rather be elsewhere. I would rather go after McDyess.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
1:26 pm

I think there are at least 7 teams clearly and considerably better than us. This stupid “4 long athletic starters” crap gets us nowhere. Horford is too small to guard anyone, Smoove is a risk defender, an awful post defender, and can’t make a jumpshot. Joe is too big and plays too many minutes, and Marvin is still an awkward and timid player who is too scared to shoot (his only big shot was that shot against the Celtics).
It’s time to bring a superstar post player like Amare or Bosh and to get rid of this starting core I feel like we’ve had for 4 years. Horford is not the answer.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
1:51 pm

Ramon,

The idea that finding a serviceable point guard is easier than finding an athletic wing player is just…well, I don’t have a good name for it. I guess it depends on what your idea of “serviceable” is. Do you know who James Singleton and Gerald Green are? Two guys who rival Josh Smith in overall athleticism, and neither one is having an impact in the league. There are many more where they come from. Athletic wings are available in every draft, and many teams have more than one. We had two or three ALREADY, when we drafted Marvin…I agree that good defensive bigs (particularly good centers) ARE hard to find.

You’re right that we wouldn’t have the exact same roster if we had drafted one of those guys we’ve been talking about. I won’t pretend to know if we would have been a better team or not, but I suspect we would be. I can tell you what we wouldn’t have: a point guard problem. Took us forever to get a decent pg (Mike Bibby), now here we are AGAIN, staring our two vets who can play that position in the face as unrestricted free agents, and a guy who may as well be a rookie (Law).

And are you basing CP3’s ability on coaching alone? If that’s the case, everybody on Byron Scott’s team should be as good as CP3 is. I think if he got drafted by Minnesota, he’d be putting up numbers that are just as good. Except he’d have Al Jefferson to work with, versus David West.

Anyway, while it does haunt us to a point, it’s over and done already.

Sautee

June 15th, 2009
1:53 pm

darrell starks

June 15th, 2009
1:59 pm

Ramon are you telling me that you wouldnt trade horford and marvin for bosh i say do it bosh is 25 years of age who has become a better post defender over the years because he has picked up solid weight and thru out his career he avg 1.2 blocks a game plus 9.2 rebounds a game if you trade for bosh not only the team will be better the offense want be so stagnated while everybody standing around waiting on joe to dribble the ball 20 seconds of the 24seconds left on the shot clock the hawks will finally have that low post presents that we so badly need.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
1:59 pm

I’m still waiting for Sekou’s summer blog where he tells us about Marvin working out with Sean May and working on his African Studies Degree. And also remembering to work out since he is an NBA player

Melvin

June 15th, 2009
2:15 pm

Nire,

I agree that the consensus in 2005 was that Marvin was going to be an all/super star player but unfortuately for the Hawks. He’s not the player that they thought he was going to be (at least up to this point). Hindsight, if they had to do that draft over. I bet the Bucks wouldn’t pick Bogut number 1 either. If thats the case, then both teams miss out on that draft….

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
2:27 pm

Darrell, I wouldn’t make that trade sorry. You say the offense would be better, but how much would that affect the overall game if the defense is sucking? If you used those same pieces to get a better defensive center, instead of a scoring power forward, the offense would be better any way. Its a lot easier to score when you get stops, than it is when you’re taken the ball out after scored possessions. Look at Washington, they always had a better offense than Atlanta, still couldn’t beat them because of defense. If you’re trying to advance further in the playoffs, you don’t do it by trading defensive players for offensive players.

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
2:47 pm

Ray, I respect that. But think about this. Eric Snow, Jameer Nelson, Alston, Kenny Smith, Rondo, Fisher, and Andre Miller, are those not serviceable point guards? Aside from Tony Parker, who was the last point guard to win MVP of the FINALS (I’m thinking probably Thomas almost 20 years ago)? Gerald Green and the others you mentioned can’t defend anything, other wise he would have a job.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
2:56 pm

Niremetal,

I’ve see the article before. It amuses me to no end that you use it, and I’m sure you can figure out why, after all the noise you’ve made about websites and their articles. An article is no guarantee that “Every GM in the league would have taken Marvin 2nd, and some would have taken him 1st.” That is nothing more than an opinion that you have. Apparently Milwaukee passed on him for a position of need: center. There is no FACT that proves that Marvin would have gone second with any GM in the league, article or not. What, did the author of that article poll all the league’s GMs to get that info? It’s an educated guess, but a guess nonetheless.

And I can’t for the life of me understand why Roy Williams, as great a college coach as he is, would bring such an awesome player off the bench all year long. He must have missed the memo…Either that, or Marvin wasn’t good enough to start. But that is neither here nor there.

Since you brought that article up, I decided to see what they said about Chris Paul. Well, turns out they said he was a better prospect than Baron Davis was, and the best pg prospect since Jason Kidd. Hmmph. “Merely very good” indeed…

Once more, I think it was a bad decision. We needed a pg, a leader (because we damn sure didn’t have that), and a floor general. So if I’m reading that article prior to the draft like a good little GM, do I pass on the best pg prospect since Jason Kidd for a small forward who “projects” to be a superstar, when I already have two or three good ones?

Name me the last superstar small forward who led his team to a championship. Lebron might be the first, but he’s not there yet. I seem to recall a particularly talented SF/PF type who did very well in the league. No rings. Not even close. His name was Glenn Robinson.

Just my opinion…I don’t agree with the logic of it. And we’ve seen things happen in the draft often enough to know that regardless of what an article says, something else may happen.

Icycle

June 15th, 2009
3:13 pm

Big Ray,

Marvin didn’t need to start. His team won the championship. but I forgot: you know everything

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
3:19 pm

When drafted Marvin wasn’t only projected a SF. And last I check Garnett, Pierce, Bryant, Duncan, Kemp, Malone, Barkley, Drexler, Bird, Pippen, MJ, and more all lead their teams to the Finals. Marvin was projected as being able to play 3 positions. On the court, Marvin is still in the top 3 of the best in that draft. Its just been his aggressiveness that has been slow to come around. Could it had been better yes. But it wasn’t a waste of a pick.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
3:19 pm

Ramon,

Why does everybody go to the extreme like that? I never said anything about a point guard winning the NBA Finals MVP. I don’t want that, and I don’t think we need it. Just wanted a good point guard, and we missed on that twice over. Yes, a serviceable point guard is fine if you have stars at other positions. Do we have stars at other positions? Other than JJ, the answer is no. Anyway, I feel that the position is very pivotal.

Anyway, Gerald Green and James Singleton, among many others simply illustrate that athletic swingmen can be had in abundance. Serviceable point guards that fit your offense and can lead a team are not as easy to come by.

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
3:24 pm

Big Ray, your comment about serviceable point guards that fits your offense is the perfect thing reason why it was ok not to draft them at that time. Woody didn’t (and still doesn’t) have an offense. Green and Singleton are athletes, not athletic basketball players, otherwise they would both be employed. One thing people forget about in that draft was the fact that Marvin had the better character record on his side. When being compared to Grant Hill, that was a huge thing that went to marketability.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
3:30 pm

Icycle,

Clearly you don’t understand what I was getting at. Of course, the fact that I wasn’t talking to you might have something to do with it. And if I knew everything, I would be doing something more productive than blogging. But I do love your logic: Marvin didn’t have to start. His team won the championship. What was your point? Adam Morrison didn’t have to start for the Lakers either. His team won the championship.

Ding…

Khao$

June 15th, 2009
3:35 pm

Aight Sekou, Chad Ford is reporting the Hawks are trying to trade Smith. What is your intel saying?

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
3:44 pm

Ramon,

I have to agree with your last post completely. Gerald Green is with the Mavs (can’t remember where Singleton is, maybe Europe), but I can’t figure out what his issue is. Must be mental.

Gotta give Marvin credit for being the kind of guy he is. Great character. I think the pundits/experts comparing him to Grant Hill was unfair, but these things happen. Prior to injury, Grant Hill was about as versatile a superstar as there was in the NBA. He was freakin’ awesome. Capable of averaging 8 boards and 7 assists along with 21 or more points, he was a better and much more athletic version of Joe Johnson BEFORE there was Joe Johnson. Unfortunately for us, and for Marvin, he’s just not that kind of guy, though he will probably prove to be better than he’s showing us right now. Grant Hill’s impact was immediate.

newkid

June 15th, 2009
3:48 pm

Any of you cats hear Phil Jackson last night describe the re-building of the Lakers since 2005? I think he said Walton and Kobe were the only players on the ‘05 squad still around for the ‘09 championship celebration. He mentioned Kupchak (UNC) moving players who didn’t have the commitment to put in the work to win a championship and building a team of coachable players who were totally about winning the Larry O’Brien trophy (gorgeous, wasn’t it?).

Re-building to be ‘competitive’ means you’re satisfied with putting a few more butts in the seats (or in the case of Mr Sund, just getting through the 1st round), while being careful you don’t end up on financial relief. It sets you on a path to get ‘talent’ like Sheldon Williams, Marvin Williams (UNC), Speedy Claxton, and a host of very low to minimum salary players like Radmo and Solomon Jones, and a refusal to release an unimaginative, ineffective head coach because you can’t (or won’t) incur the costs of carrying his salary while you pay a more capable alternative to do the job you were unrealistically wishing he would do on the cheap. Building to win the O’Brien trophy puts you on a path that gets you a $12 million per annun head coach (tops in the biz), and a talent evaluation system that directs you to players like Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, Trevor Ariza, and others that take you 5+ million above the luxury tax threshold, but returns a championship parade in mid-June and an almost guaranteed sellout for the entire ‘09/’10 season.

And we the fans – and sports writers (where’s Atlanta’s version of Cosell?) – have gotten so satisfied with the ‘re-building to be competitive’ approach that we wax poetic about how the draft is so much about luck more than skilled talent evaluation; how prohibitably expensive it is to get the proper talent to win the O’Brien trophy; the wisdom of continuing to hold on to one favored player or another hoping against hope that ONE DAY he’ll reach some imaginary potential; about how much the ASG’s endless in-fighting is wreaking havoc with the financial ability to really put together a winner; and all sorts of other fantasies that – perhaps inadvertently – rationalize the repeated failures of the organization to build a championship calibre side.

No matter how it’s cut, sliced, and parsed, the naked truth is our guys have been proper failures in the pursuit of the O’Brien trophy (what’s it been, about 50 years), and sorry to say there doesn’t appear to be an end in sight. Where are you Mr. Blank?

Icycle

June 15th, 2009
3:56 pm

And I can’t for the life of me understand why Roy Williams, as great a college coach as he is, would bring such an awesome player off the bench all year long.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
3:58 pm

Ramon,

I agree that Marvin was and is rated as a “combo forward.” But a power forward he is NOT, and not by any stretch of the imagination. His game screams SF, despite his size.

As for the guys you mentioned, I’ll give you a friendly argument on them:

MJ (a SG) led his teams to titles with the help of Pippen. Pippen would not and could not have done it alone. He never even came close once the days of him and MJ were over, and certainly didn’t when MJ was out (when his father died). Garnett is a PF, and he led the Celtics to a championship, as we see Paul Pierce could not do it prior to his arrival, and was not able to do it this year when Garnett was missing. You could argue that Pierce led his team (in scoring at least), but it still remains that without Garnett…he couldn’t even reach the East Finals.

Barkley, Malone, Duncan, and Kemp. All power forwards. Arguably, Kemp didn’t lead his team to the finals. Gary Payton did, with Kemp’s help. Payton was the unquestioned leader (or so I saw it). Kobe Bryant is a SG just like MJ. The only guy I’d say you were right on was Larry Bird, who was one of the most unique combo forwards of all time. Of course, he also had help from Parrish, McHale, and the rest of that awesome crew.

Beyond that, I think the first SF who unquestionably leads his team to the Finals was Lebron James. He did it once, so far.

Finally, I agree that Marvin was NOT a waste of a pick. I just don’t think he was the best one, and never did in the first place. But he’s a good player. Just not as good (at least yet) as we hope/need him to be.

SaulRunigan

June 15th, 2009
4:02 pm

The Hawks should trade Marvin Williams for Rafer Alsten since Rafer can’t seem to get the playing time he wants in Orlando. Plus with Jameer Nelson returning next year, Rafer will waste away on the bench. I think the Hawks should attempt to obtain three players in the off-season: 1) Rafer Alsten, 2) Antonio McDyess and 3) Amare Stoudemire. Acquiring those three guys while dumping Bibby and Marvin Williams should all but guarantee the Hawks win the NBA title next season.

Icycle

June 15th, 2009
4:27 pm

Big Ray you don’t make any sense. And what is a ding?

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
4:29 pm

What is with this trading Josh Smith rumor?

Woodson is likely gone after this year (I think?), Smoove was our best player in the playoffs, and if he could develop a d@mn jumpshot might be a top 10 player in the next 18 months. Trade Bibby, Marvin, or Horford, unless you can get Amare or Bosh

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
4:35 pm

While I have no problem seconding Clyde’s mention of Ken Strickland for Blogger of the Year…

But I’m going to go with Newkid…

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
4:41 pm

Big Ray, I agree with that. At the time, I wanted them to pick Chris Paul. But if not Paul, Marvin was my second choice. I won’t lie, I was one who saw Marvin’s potential and rated it higher than Deron who was (I think) the 3rd leading scorer on his team. And after seeing how much Deron struggled against UNC, I didn’t think he would be quick enough to be an all star.

You stated Hill’s impact was immediate, and you’re correct. And by no means, is Williams even close to what Hill was pre-injury. However, Hill was a 4 year starter, (I may be wrong). Four years of college and I have no reason to believe Marvin wouldn’t have been the number one pick when he came out, even over Durant and Oden.

All I’m saying is, I’d rather have Smooth, Williams, and Horford (adding in another veteran center), than to have one Deron or CP3. To be honest, with the right point guard, and more quickness by Marvin, that could be a potent line up as is now.

Astro Joe

June 15th, 2009
4:46 pm

Here’s an excerpt from ESPN.com:

The Hawks have had no problem finding teams interested in Smith. The issue is the whopping $6 million trade kicker attached to his contract. The trade kicker essentially would require the team that trades for Smith to pay him the $6 million immediately. In this economic climate, many owners will balk at the payment.

“You are going to see very few owners willing to do things like that anymore,” one GM said. “I’m not saying he’s impossible to trade. There are a few owners like Paul Allen, James Dolan, Mark Cuban and maybe Daniel Gilbert who would pay the money. But there aren’t many.”

In case you don’t recognize the names, they’re speculating that Portland, Knicks, Dallas and Cleveland’s owners may be willing to take on the extra payment for Smith. And the trade kicker would have been placed in the contract by Memphis and was likely to discourage the Hawks from matching. Of course, Sund matched the offer sheet in about 30 seconds, so it did nothing to discourage the Hawks.

Manny/Nire, does the trade kicker count toward the amount of the returning salaries? In other words, would Sund have to get within 25% of Smith’s base of around $11M or $17M? I assume the $11M but I’m not sure.

fudd21

June 15th, 2009
4:49 pm

Sekou,
Chad Ford says the Hawks have been working hard the past few weeks to find a taker for Smith. Maybe Sund has been reading the blog and working on a trade with Toronto for Bosh. Your thoughts?

ILL-logical

June 15th, 2009
4:57 pm

First, the rumor was Marvin on a sign and trade for CASH; then it was Joe to Philly for Dalember and Young; now it is Josh for whoever will take this salary. True or not none of this sounds like an organization without any asperations but to survive financially until they can sell out (legally this time).

Not good. Not good at all. Maybe the Woody/Joe faction is threatening to bolt unless Josh goes and remember Amare stated in his press conference that Atlanta wanted him badly(sic).

Maybe this is what Mr. Bradley has been hinting at with his twice featured story on Joe vs. Josh trades?
Will Atlanta ever have a winning professional franchise?

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
4:59 pm

What exactly is a trade kicker? Does the 6 mill mean a team has to pay Smoove that up front?

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
5:01 pm

ILL, these are all baseless trade rumors.

NBA Experts/insiders know that this year’s draft sucks and that the finals were pretty dull, so they’ve had time to speculate rumors. Any NBA site/ESPN can come up with some retarded rumor like Marvin + Acie for Richard Jefferson. Remember the now infamous Steven A. Smith said that Smoove disliked Woody so much (last summer) that there was no way he’d be back? That’s Steven A., one of the most knowledgeable NBA people out there.

Everyone calm down

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
5:08 pm

Sure sund go ahead. Trade 23 year old J-Smoove. I’ll be the first one to Crucify you in every way possible. Somebody tell Clyde to fire up the T-Shirts. If Smoove leaves then Bibby has to go too. Smoove is the only person who covers for Bibby inability to stay in front of his assignment with his weak-side help/Blocking. Besides, he gets his four assists per game by lobs of pick n’ roll plays w/Smoove.

No Josh=Useless Bibby…….I’m just sayin’.

terrell barron

June 15th, 2009
5:14 pm

Hedo is looking for 4 yr 40 mill. I’d like to see him playing point-forward for the Hawks. I’d rather pay him 10 mil. a year opposed to paying Bibby or Marvin 7 or 8 mil. a year.

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
5:19 pm

Ray,

I use that article because it’s representative. I remember Googling about a year ago and looking at the mock drafts that were posted before the lottery (i.e. before anyone knew who would hold the #2 overall pick) and all but one of them had Marvin at #1 or #2. You know I wasn’t just using that article because it was the only one that said it – I did it because it encapsulated the consensus in 30 words. There were more than a few mocks that had Gerald Green ranked ahead of Deron and Paul early on. The thing to remember is that Marvin STAYED at #2 through April, May, and June while Green and Granger slid down on people’s draft boards.

As for him not starting in college, it’s misleading to use that as a strike against him. He was a super-sixth man for UNC, kinda like Manu is for San Antonio or Detlef was for the Pacers of old. You gonna hold it against the young John Havlicek too? Hell, you don’t even have to look at hall of famers. You can just look at JT in Dallas, or even Tyronn Lue here (remember that Royal Ivey “started over him”). I’m prodding you for a reason. You know that saying “why didn’t he start” isn’t even telling half the story.

He played starter’s minutes. His coach just decided that he was better used as a jolt of energy off the bench, which seemed to work pretty damned well – a fact that prompted more than a few people around here to question why Woody didn’t try using him in the same way. I STILL don’t get why we don’t try that with him. I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t take it as disrespect. And if he leaves this summer, I wouldn’t be shocked if some other team used him that way again.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
5:23 pm

I agree, Terrell…

I would pay Andre Miller that money over Mike Bibby. Turkoglu is freaking huge, can play 4 positions, and is a deadly shooter at the end of games. If we let Bibs walk and S&T or let Marv walk, we have 20 mill of cap space over last year? Don’t forget Speedy’s 5.5 mill…. I don’t know if Turk can produce like this for 4 more years though. But the great thing is that HEDO CAN PRODUCE HIS OWN OFFENSE. HE DOES NOT NEED A POINT GUARD. I don’t know how well he and Joe would get along though. Our shot distribution would probably be: 20 FGA for Joe, 20 FGA for Hedo, 5 for Horford, and so on

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
5:26 pm

And Ray, if you’re gonna mock me by demanding that I provide sources to it or get back into my methodology, I’ll just tell you now what I said to Sautee – I’m done arguing those points. You know I’m not BSing about Marvin’s projected draft position being top 2 from the NCAA tourney onward, so don’t get into it with me on that. I’m not gonna bite anymore.

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
5:29 pm

Astro,

Is that from an “Insider” article? I don’t see it on the Hawks’ ESPN page…

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
5:32 pm

Astro,

Until June 30, the BYC rules apply to Smoove but not thereafter. Sadly, the trade kicker rules are the one thing I just can’t seem to wrap my mind around still. Manny, do you get how those things work?

A Tribe Called Quest

June 15th, 2009
5:40 pm

nire,

Realgm

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
5:43 pm

OH MY GAWD!!!! GameTime has gone BONKERS over on youtube!!!! He just made 08-09 Mixes for all the Hawks starters+Flip….I think I just wet my pants lol.

LINKS COMING SOON!!!!!!!!!!

Sautee

June 15th, 2009
5:51 pm

Niremetal,

So you can say ANYTHING YOU WANT on the blog, and because you refuse to argue, then you have “carte blanche” to blather without accountability?

Good luck with that attitude in the courtroom, buddy.

And know that some of us will STILL bring up seeming contradictory statements that you make. If you don’t care to argue, so be it. It will just weaken the very points you are attempting to make.

Others bring up something from an article on the web and you IMMEDIATELY try to discredit the source, by saying not to “risk” info from some of these “new” sites. But when an article from one of the “old” sites that YOU think will bolster YOUR point is found, you use it proudly.

Go ahead, be a hypocrite. But don’t think it doesn’t affect your credibility.

cp

June 15th, 2009
6:03 pm

I saw the discussion with ray and some others. Green and Singleton both play for the Mavs. ray made a great point about those athletic forwards or swing-men or whatever you want to call them. If you remember Marv was called a once in 10 years type forward in the draft. Guess what, Rudy Gay was in the next draft. It is a lot easier to find a athletic small forward than a pg that fits your system. At one point we had Marv, Chillz, Donta Smith, and Josh Smith. And to add onto the Marvin discussion. If you watched those Carolina games it was easy to see why Marvin came off the bench, Jawad Williams was actually a better player. He played for Cleveland this past season. He was a underrated starter on that championship team.

ILL-logical great post. I have read so many rumors about guys on this team being traded that I just chalk it up to summer boredom. However the Marvin trade has been out there more. If we take a guy like Earl Clark this year I would not be shocked if we do try to sign and trade Marvin. It is going to be a crazy summer.

Ken Strickland

June 15th, 2009
6:03 pm

It amazes me how quickly some of you will juMP to the wildest conclusions based on nothing but conjecture. Didn’t the Suns, and a lot of you, think Shaq would take the Suns to a championship? Look at how that turned out. The Cavaliers are a team that attackes the basket, and Shaq would make that much more difficult by clogging up the middle. Shaq could cause the same chemistry problems for Cleveland that EBrand caused for Philly.

Even though HC PJackson had a solid starting 5, and a 6th man supreme in LOdom, Isn’t it amazing how he still managed to develop and utilize so many of his young, talented bench players throughout the regular season and the playoffs? Developing and relying on his young bench players thoughout the regular season and playoffs didn’t stop his Lakers from dominating and winning the NBA championship. HOW MANY OF YOU THINK THESE FACTS WILL GO UNRECOGNIZED AND/OR UNAPPRECIATED BY OUR OWN SHORTSIGHTED HC?

darrell starks

June 15th, 2009
6:04 pm

Ramon you have to understand that in order for you to go to the next level you have to have atleast 2 or 3 stars and marvin is to awkward and horford have no low post move in the post he is to mechanical and that being said everyone is always pointing the finger at josh on defense he give more weakside help than any player on the team if josh play with in him self and play above the rim he could be a beast in the nba that can be coach and i do not trade that type of talent away we are trying to win titles.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:15 pm

You won’t say that after I post these links!!!! Besides, our starters ONLY played 20 something games together as a whole….injuries……

Draft Ellington and Graan and Bring everybody else back….Ok Forget Gerald Green…Just Sign Anthony Parker….oh and I take Back what I said about Bibby earlier.

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
6:27 pm

Ramon,

That is about as honest and reasonable a point of view as I’ve seen on the subject. And I can certainly understand your thoughts in that last paragraph. Well, here’s to hoping we solve our pg situation in a reasonable way. All I really want is a guy who is the best fit, and somebody we can count on in that spot for years to come. I don’t like doing 1-and-a-half year rentals or crusty vets who can’t give you much. We’ll see what happens.

Niremetal,

Niremetal,

I’m not going all over this again, and I’m done explaining my position. The comments I made about Marvin not starting were of a suggestive nature, and clearly the suggestion never hit it’s intended mark, despite the fact that you arrived at some conclusions that I also arrived at. It’s pointless to tie both sets of thoughts in right now, as you are headed in another direction altogether.

As for the article you used. It was representative of what various media personnel, pundits, experts, etc were thinking. It was NOT representative of what was in the minds of League Execs at that point. For anybody to suggest that it was, would be misleading. That was my point. League Execs play all sorts of games when it comes to draft prospects, and if they came to a consensus about any particular draft pick, you could just about bet that each and every one of them is working some kind of angle, and is not giving you the whole truth and nothing but the truth. That’s all I have to say about it at this point.

“He played starter’s minutes. His coach just decided that he was better used as a jolt of energy off the bench, which seemed to work pretty damned well – a fact that prompted more than a few people around here to question why Woody didn’t try using him in the same way. I STILL don’t get why we don’t try that with him. I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t take it as disrespect. And if he leaves this summer, I wouldn’t be shocked if some other team used him that way again.”

I’ll give you one reason why. Woody did not want either pg. He did want Marvin. He got Marvin. Marvin’s a #2 pick. You don’t draft a guy #2 to be your sixth man, super sub or not. Woody is stubborn, so he’s going to continue to start his #2 pick. In the meantime, who do you replace a future superstar in the starting lineup with? Uh-huh. Rhetorical question….

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:36 pm

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:41 pm

GameTime-Flip Murray 08-09 Mix

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2P3HaRWf0U&feature=channel

You’re gonna love this one….

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:44 pm

The background music is ironic because Flip says that on the court a lot. “By yourself Joe!!!!” “By Yourself Mike!!!!!” “By Yourself Marv!!!”

Next GameTime-Josh Smith 08-09 Mix

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY3y7d8-fdU&feature=channel

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:48 pm

Ramon

June 15th, 2009
6:50 pm

I will say this. Marvin is a better player than Rip Hamilton was at this stage of his career.

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:52 pm

GameTime-Al Horford 08-09 Mix

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqIyBuLAymY&feature=channel

It’s been a while since ANYONE has made a Horford mix……not since right after he was drafted/part of his rookie campaign…..

Wabe

June 15th, 2009
6:54 pm

Interesting to see Ellington’s name in the mix now.

Honestly, I like Ellington. He’s capable of doing multiple things. It’s been mentioned that he has a jumpshot, but how his jumpshot translates to the pro game is still a question mark. I mean just look at JJ Reddick, he was lights out shooting the ball in college – but isn’t anywhere near as effective in the NBA. IF HIS JUMP SHOT IS AS GOOD AS ADVERTISED – HE COULD END UP BEING A STEAL at 19. He attacks the basket and takes contact. I personally wouldn’t complain if the Hawks took this route.

I know everybody including myself is SCREAMING POINT GAURD at Sund in a point gaurd heavy draft, but I wouldn’t mind drafting Ellington and going out and getting someone like Andre Miller. I know we’re looking for the ‘point gaurd of the future’ – but we’re also in desperate need of some talented ‘roll players’. Look at the Magic, Courtney Lee and Mikael Pietrus. Ellington could be that guy for us.

19th pick – Ellington (i know he’s not projected this high) or Lawson.

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
6:57 pm

Last but certainly not least, the big head honcho Mr.$$70mill himself:

GameTime-Joe “Cool” Johnson 08-09 Mix

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMnY4xJTzJk&feature=channel

S.B.D ALL DAYYYYY!!!!!!!!

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
6:58 pm

Sautee,

My credibility? Everyone else has moved on from this except you and Ray. One time I demanded MannyT to come up with a source for a statement I found dubious and one time I explained the way I personally evaluate sources. Manny moved on. You can’t, that’s your problem. Don’t kid yourself into thinking that anyone cares at this point except you, so my “credibility” isn’t at issue for anyone but you. And until you start addressing my points instead of caricatures of them, I just don’t care how you view of my credibility.

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
7:05 pm

Ray,

I grant that the various media folks aren’t inside the brains of the front office folks, but you know that their projections (ie the mock drafts) nearly always end up tracking the end result (i.e. the actual drafts) pretty closely. I certainly admit that one mock draft viewed in isolation means very little, and I admit I was being hyperbolic when I said that NO would have taken CP3 or Deron over Marvin. But when you see the same projections over and over and over again for a particular player, odds are that the front office staffs are thinking along the same lines. After all, with the exception of super-private workouts (which usually are only done for foreign players under contract overseas), they are seeing the same thing the front office folks are.

In any case, we’ve talked about Marvin many a time. We have roughly the same view on where he is now and how he has been mishandled in the past. The big question is what happens with him now…

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
7:05 pm

I say we go get thre NCAA champions and put them on the roster (Danny Green, Wayne Ellington, and Tyler Handbrough) I mean, If you look at our squad now, have the NCAA title winners not lived up to expectations either here or somewhere else earlier in ther careers?

Mike Bibby, Al Horford, and Marvin Williams? Just Sayin’….

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
7:18 pm

Niremetal,

You are continually missing my point. I am not mocking you by demanding that you provide sources. I’ll explain this one point, and then that is it. I cannot explain it any further or any better, I think.

I never said you were BSing about Marvin’s draft position. You once said to me that the people on draftexpress and other sites were good about saying what they thought teams should do, rather than what those teams’ executives were really thinking. I understand that.

Then you give me this article, and tell me that Marvin was the consensus #2 pick quite steadily (and I believe it).

Then you tell me that every GM in the league would have picked Marvin at #2, and some would have picked him at #1.

The difference to me is that this “consensus” was of the “draft experts” and other personnel who are paid to write about this stuff. You are in effect telling me that you know what every GM in the league was thinking, and you’re basing it on what? For the last time, are you telling me that this consensus was based on what all League executives were thinking, or on what the various media-based individuals and web sites were thinking?

If these sites are more about their opinion of what a team SHOULD be doing, and less about what a team IS doing, then a consensus of such sources is NOT the same as a consensus amongst league executives, plain an simple. You claim to know, based on nothing that I can see more than that article, that you know what every GM in the League would have done in that draft. Your words. I don’t know how you can claim that with a straight face. But you did.

In effect, I am not mocking you. If there is any mocking going on, you are doing it to yourself. I simply said I was not buying it, and used a bunch of rhetoric and other stuff to say it without seeming like a too much of a putz. Didn’t work, I see. My mistake.

You’re right. Everybody else seemed to get past this. That’s largely because they didn’t care to bother with it in the first place. For once, I feel like I should have followed the crowd and ignored a lot of this.

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
7:21 pm

I’ll Post this one too just for kicks

08-09 Acie Law Mix: some of you may have already seen this…..

Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzy_ja_9yLM

“Law is a traditional pg if he gets placed in the right system he could be an all-star easy”……by tha way….lol

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
7:31 pm

Yesss, come over to the Darkside Ray…..WATCH MY LINKS ISNTEAD BWAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
7:31 pm

Nice links, Ariose.

It may be too late for that, though, as you know. We’ll see.

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
7:32 pm

OOPS…”INSTEAD” BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 15th, 2009
7:34 pm

AROISE nice i like that coach woody slow clyde i need a T SHIRT.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
7:50 pm

Ray,

See my last post re: the “every GM comment.” I thought it was clear I was being hyperbolic, but I guess it wasn’t. Hyperbole doesn’t translate well over the internet.

To be literal, here’s my point:
“I think that a solid majority of GM’s in the league would have picked Marvin at #2.”

And here’s a better effort at hyperbole where the hyperbole is more clear:
“Every freaking GM in the league was so busy creaming himself over Marvin that there’s no way in hell any of them would have picked CP3 over him.”

Better? ;)

niremetal

June 15th, 2009
7:52 pm

And I now want to say (begin sarcasm) “Screw you, Ariose” for giving me links that undoubtedly will distract me from studying for at least an hour tonight. Thanks man. Because lord knows this blog wasn’t distracting enough before ;)

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
8:22 pm

Hhehehehe, thats what i’m here for lol. I’m actually destracting myself b/c i’ve got two exams to study for heh. I think i’ve gotten my fix for today though lol…..back to the books!!!!

Good luck tyna’ get some studyin’ done hehehe ;-)

Big Ray

June 15th, 2009
8:45 pm

Works for me. Now time for me to do some studying of my own, though I thoroughly enjoy what I’m going to be studying.

In between Ariose links, that is…

Sautee

June 15th, 2009
8:45 pm

“I certainly admit that one mock draft viewed in isolation means very little, and I admit I was being hyperbolic when I said that NO would have taken CP3 or Deron over Marvin.”

THAT’S what Ray and I were pushing for. Accountability. Thanks for the mea culpa, though I know it wasn’t intended for me.

Peace

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
8:47 pm

SEKOU!!!! What in the tarnation is going on with all these J-Smoove rumors flyin around?????? Say it aint so??????? Thas BS Gearon/Sund are Liars.

Sekou, Youll join my Anti-ASG Lynch mob Won’t you???? o_0 ;-)

Ariose

June 15th, 2009
8:59 pm

If the Hawks decide a no contract extension having Mike Woodson is more valuable to the team than Josh Smith then I’m going to be speechless….

It’s not Smoove’s fault the ASG wasted all their money paying off cour fees….

Shooter Bob

June 20th, 2009
9:03 pm

Do you think the Hawks will draft another shooter who can’t play defense or can’t handle the ball well? They have drafted a few of these in the past, but none were able to score from the bench! I hope this time the Hawks draft a player who the coach will want to put on the floor!