Superman’s return!

Superman's is soaring into the NBA Finals for the first time. The rest of the league is on notice.

Superman has put the entire league on notice with his performance in these playoffs.

HAWKSVILLE - Next time I’ll listen.

In the wake of the Hawks’ being swept out of the Eastern Conference semifinals against Cleveland, people that watch NBA basketball as much and as hard as I do kept warning me that Dwight Howard and the Orlando Magic would end the reign of the King (LeBron James).

No one was more vocal about it than Tracy Johnson (Joe Johnson’s uncle) of Little Rock, Ark. He warned me several times, and he actually started during the Magic-Celtics series, not to put too much stock in Cleveland’s four-game demolition of the Hawks in the Eastern Conference semifinals.

The “matchups” would carry the Magic, he said. And he was right. The Cavaliers never did find an answer for Rashard Lewis and Hedo Turkoglu. I’m not sure they made a sincere attempt to find an answer.

Well, there is no answer, at least not a one-man answer, for Howard, who has stolen James’ thunder as the youngest and most promising NBA talent in these playoffs.

Tracy’s warnings went beyond the playoffs, though, extending to the Hawks’ issues in the Southeast Division – if you haven’t noticed already, there’s a big bad bully on the block now in the division and the Eastern Conference and it’s not the King (who remains the most mercurial talent of his generation).

It’s Howard.

Even worse for the Hawks and everyone else, there is no Mickael Pietrus for Howard. Pietrus effectively harassed James long enough on the defensive end to allow the Magic’s other matchup advantages to swing the series. And when given a choice between defending the Magic’s 3-point shooters or double-teaming Howard … the phrase pick your poison doesn’t do it justice.

Now, the rest of the division, the Eastern Conference and perhaps the league (depending on what happens in the NBA Finals) must figure out how to build a team capable of beating Howard’s Magic.

YOU WON’T FIND A SOLUTION FOR HOWARD IN THE NBA DRAFT. No one stacks up physically, shoulder to outlandishly buff shoulder to the former Southwest Atlanta Christian star.

And the measurements from the NBA’s pre-draft combine in Chicago made that abundantly clear. Our friends at DraftExpress (one stop shopping for all things draft) were kind of enough to compile and share this handy chart for our viewing pleasure. To say this draft is light on big bodies would be an extreme understatement.

By my count, there are only 12 players that measured a legitimate 6-9 or taller. Just 12. That’s not exactly a smorgasboard of options for teams in need. The bigger question is where have all the big boys gone?

That shallow pool of bog bodies makes the prospect of locating a quality big man in this draft extremely difficult for teams picking outside of the lottery (teams like the Hawks).

 

Chasing a big man in the draft can be a dangerous proposition. Exhibit A, Shelden Williams.

Chasing a big man in the draft can be a dangerous proposition. Exhibit A, Shelden Williams.

Still, I’m hearing rumblings that North Carolina’s Tyler Hansbrough is one of this draft’s risers right now. The Hawks are in need of help along the frontcourt but I was thinking someone bigger than Hansbrough. Still, if they’re on the board at 19 and have Hansbrough rated higher than any of the point guards available …. it’s happened here before folks (Shelden Williams over Brandon Roy ranks up high in the draft gaffe Hall of Fame). You know it as well as I do. NBA executives always tend to value size over anything else, to their own detriment most times.

My two favorite point guards in this draft, North Carolina’s Ty Lawson and Syracuse’s Jonny Flynn, are nearly identical in every department (a shade over 6-foot, a couple ounces over 195 pounds depending on what they ate for breakfast that day). I’m a lot less interested in their combine numbers than I am in what they do when the big lights come on. And both of these guys get it done come game time.

IN ADDITION TO THE DRAFT CHATTER, FREE AGENT AND TRADE TALK IS HEATING UP around the league. That’s always a good thing for us, since the prospect of something that’s virtually impossible always seems to generate a greater response than anything remotely possible.

The Hawks won’t be the only team scouring the NBA landscape for frontcourt help this summer. Apparently the team that vanquished them in the playoffs is in need of a little updgrde up front as well, per my man Bob Finnan of the News Herald in suburban Cleveland.

One player mentioned in Bob’s story that will no doubt be mentioned in many others as the summer drags on is Hawks reserve center Zaza Pachulia.

Every playoff team in need of a depth along the frontline is going to be interested in a player like Zaza, for obvious reasons (he has the size, experienced and ability needed to play a vital role for a contender plus he’s going to be affordable for most teams because he’ll command a salary around the mid-level exception over the course of the next three or four years – similar to the four-year $16 million deal he just finished up with the Hawks).

 

The Hawks can't afford to lose a quality reserve big man like Zaza Pachulia.

The Hawks can ill afford to lose a quality big man like Zaza Pachulia in these trying economic times around the NBA.

Pachulia’s an unrestricted free agent, meaning the Hawks will have to compete to keep him. And I’m not sure he isn’t there most crucial free agent they need to retain because of the dearth of quality and affordable bigs on the market.

I know several of the Hawks’ competitors in the Eastern Conference are interested, I’ve spoken to executives from four teams that have brought his name up in our conversations over the past two weeks.

There are other guys in that realm with higher profiles (guys like Rasheed Wallace, Antonio McDyess, Chris Wilcox, Joe Smith and others) that are a bit of a risk compared to Pachulia because they’re older and perhaps will command a bit more money (in the case of Wallace).

I thought Pachulia was a monster bargain when the Hawks snagged him initially. The expectations were raised after his first season with the team, when he was thrust into a starting role and flourished after Jason Collier’s sudden and tragic death. Pachulia for anything near the same price right now is an equally monstrous bargain.

I know everyone is always interested in upgrading. But sometimes it’s not nearly as easy you might think to get a better bang for your buck. And whatever you think of Pachulia, he’s a good bargain for a player with his credentials.

BACK TO THE DRAFT BUZZ, the one player’s name that keeps coming up in all the conversations I’m having with people is Jrue Holiday. The UCLA point guard, who has yet to cement his draft situation by hiring an agent, is following in the footsteps for former Bruin and Oklahoma City standout Russell Westbrook.

Both players played alongside a pretty good point guard in his own right (Darren Collison) and both played in the ultra-structured system of Bruins coach Ben Howland, so like Westbrook, there’s likely a lot more to Holiday’s game that we haven’t seen yet.

Holiday’s work at the pre-draft camp, coupled with his fantastic size (6-4 and change and a solid 200 pounds) and tremendous ceiling (he’s just 18) has done wonders for his stock with NBA types. If he decides to stay in the draft, he’s all but worked his way out of the Hawks’ range at 19.

Holiday's stock is soaring after workouts and an impressive showing at the Chicago pre-draft camp.

Holiday's stock is on the rise after impressive showings in workouts and at the Chicago pre-draft camp.

 

While the buzz about Holiday intensifies, the buzz about fellow California teenage point guard Brandon Jennings appears headed in the opposite direction. A less then stellar showing in Italy this past season didn’t help the preps-to-Europe trailblazer’s cause, though I can’t imagine what anyone expected of him making that kind of transition (I’ll be curious to see if their are similar, oversized expectations placed on Ricky Rubio if his first year in the NBA is next season).

Jennings reportedly spurned an offer to work out at the Reebok Eurobcamp (their version of the pre-draft camp), sending NBA executives scurrying to find answers as to why he would pass up an opportunity to “compete” in front of the assembled brass. But what more do you need to see from Jennings to make an adequate assessment of his game?

If you need more on the draft crop, though, check out the athleticism test results from the pre-draft camp (courtesy of our friends at nbadraft.net, yet another fabulous site devoted to all things draft).

SPEAKING OF EXPECTATIONS GONE AWRY, I CANNOT BELIEVE FOLKS ARE STILL groaning about the Marvin Williams-is-not-Chris-Paul madness.

I know it hurts for some of us to do this, even after all these years, but it really is time to let go. Just throw darts at your Billy Knight poster for the rest of your life. But let it go.

And for the record, Marvin wasn’t the No. 1 pick in that 2005 draft. That honor belonged to Milwaukee’s Andrew Bogut, who has yet to distinguish himself as anything other than a wanna-be-dominant NBA big man (I’d argue that Toronto’s Andrea Bargnani is looking like a better pick these days).

Marvin’s first four years have been respectable and far from bust material (anyone seen Darko Milicic in a uniform lately? Anyone. Anyone. Bueller?).

552 comments Add your comment

Clyde

June 2nd, 2009
7:02 pm

Ken Strickland for Blogger Of The Year

Fire Woody

Jody

June 2nd, 2009
7:14 pm

Hey Sekou,

Any news on what the Hawks plan to do come draft time? I heard they would be working out Patrick Mills in the coming days. He seems like a legitimate option at 19.

smartguy

June 2nd, 2009
7:29 pm

FIRE STUPID WOODY!

Melvin

June 2nd, 2009
7:43 pm

Checkout Chad Ford assessment of Dejuan Blair. Putting him in the same sentence as DeMar DeRozan and DeMar is consider to have Vince Carter type athleticism…..

“ct indy: Pacers, any shot of getting Blair. I think he is a great fit on an otherwise soft team

Chad Ford: Maybe. The Bucks and Nets would have to pass on him. If they did, I think the Pacers would grab him. Blair showed to be a pretty decent athlete at the combine. He had a 33 inch vertical and a lane agility score that beat Austin Daye and DerMar DeRozan. “

Melvin

June 2nd, 2009
7:46 pm

Hmmm, I think Brandon Jennings would be a gift from the Gods if he drop to us at 19…..

“Mike (Tallahassee): Has Brandon Jennings now become the person with the biggest range on draft night? Where is his floor at this point?

Chad Ford: I’d say yes. As high as 4 (though that gets more and more doubtful by the day) as low as 19 … that’s a huge range. The truth is that everyone I speak with doesn’t have a great handle on him. Since NBA teams don’t scout high school as much and he played sporadically in Italy … it’s a big mystery.”

Samuel

June 2nd, 2009
7:47 pm

Cuz,

Gotta agree that if Lawson is available, we have to snag him. I gotta admitt that I don’t watch a lot of college basketball but the few games I saw this year, I think he was one of college basketball’s best college player.

I like CP3 but he looks like he may turn out to be a darker version of Steve Nash.

Yea, we need to keep ZaZa.

My take on the Finals.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/190843-the-2009-nba-finals-are-not-all-about-kobe-and-dwight-howard

braveshater

June 2nd, 2009
8:19 pm

How can you let the Marvin Williams is not CP3 fiasco die. I mean look at the Hawks, we just got swept by a total of 200 hundred points in the Playoffs, gimme a fucin break.

chuckw/deadjournalist

June 2nd, 2009
8:34 pm

theoretically, it’s a deep pg draft, but the hawks are in a dangerous position have having low-post player on the board (mullens from ohio state or mr. tar heel) that might cause them to, once again, go big over small. someone here brought up sund’s draft history of big men in his last three drafts in seattle. which brings me to the scary option mullens as the selection. tall big man with potential, but according a few articles, there is a lot of concern about his make-up.

while some of the early names at pg have moved up the board, the guy who i like, should be there at 19 (and maybe later if a trade down option became available): patty mills. mills was hurt for a big chunk of last year (wrist) but he played well at the end of the season and has international experience. small and quick, he seems like a perfect change of pace pg. but that’s what we thought about acie law iv as well …

chuckw/deadjournalist

June 2nd, 2009
8:39 pm

sekou – i know mark bradley was going to ask sund about him for his article/blog a couple of weeks ago, but what about david andersen? could this be the year the hawks finally make a push to bring him over?

Ariose

June 2nd, 2009
8:53 pm

Now Sekou, You KNOW Rasheed had Dwights number. He owned that man everytime they play. ‘Sheed may be Lazy at times, but theres nothing that fires him up like some other big man on the block claiming to be the next big bully.

Prediction: I Sheed+Horford+Zaza+Smoove+Solo=Too much sauce for Howard to handle. How many times has Smoove sent superman’s shots right back where they came from? Smoove refuses to be up-staged by his childhood buddy also. They have a vey intense “friendly” rivalry going on, and smoove by no means has played second fiddle when going up head to head with Howard….

Somebody PLEEASE throw Acue the keys so I can see how well he drives!!!! 6′3 195lbs Naismith winner? Hello????

Ariose

June 2nd, 2009
8:54 pm

Earth to Idiot!!!! A-C-I-E L-A-W!!!!!!!!!

Wake up WAFFLE MAN!!!!!!!!!

O'brien

June 2nd, 2009
9:05 pm

Great blog as always Sekou.

2 Questions for you:

1) What do you think of Orlando’s backup center (Gortat)?

I think he played well in limited minutes (defensively), and he only made $800K last year. I know his offense is limited, but if we can get a guy like Villanueva to play backup minutes at the 3 and 4 (Mo Evans takes care of backing up JJ), I think we can have Gortat for cheaper than what Zaza would cost, and Villanueva’s offense would compensate for Gortat’s soso offense, and Gortat’s defense would coompensate for Villanueva’s defensive deficiencies.

2) If the Hawks draft a PG at 19, does that automatically mean Acie is on the trading block? (I can’t imagine the Hawks trying to resign Bibby and Flip, while having Acie, and then drafting another PG, and still have Speedy on the roster).

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
9:53 pm

Gortat will not be much cheaper than Zaza. Teams overpay for the reserves on title-contending teams. Especially big men (see: Will Perdue, Luc Longley, Ronny Turiaf, etc…)

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
9:55 pm

And given the choice between the two, I actually take Zaza. And I think the Magic would too. Gortat is more athletic, but Zaza is tougher, better at crashing the glass, and has more offensive touch.

Melvin

June 2nd, 2009
10:10 pm

After further review, if the top PG’s are taken I say we draft Terrence Williams from Louisville…

http://www.nbadraft.net/players/terrence-williams

Sekou Smith

June 2nd, 2009
10:42 pm

The Hawks have kept their workout plans a secret from me (hey, I’m working on it but this new regime is tough to crack).

I’m not expecting David Andersen in a Hawks uniform this season, but anything can happen.

I think Gortat looks like a lot of guys that backup superstar players, he looks great in limited minutes but I’d be cautious about spending too much money on a guy I’ve only seen play (and notice I didn’t say play well) in spurts.

As far as what the Hawks will do at 19, I don’t know for certain that they’re going point guard there. If they deem Hansbrough or another big man worthy of that pick, I could see them going that route and going to work with Acie. There’s a split on Acie in Hawksville. Not everyone is convinced that he’s ready for a one way ticket out of town. And there’s some merit to not jumping the gun on moving him.

Melvin

June 2nd, 2009
10:59 pm

Sekou,

If they are not going to bring Andersen over then they should trade his rights for something of value in return. Judging from the highlights of him, I would prefer to see him in a Hawks uniform. He look very skill for a big man. As for Acie, I say Woody needs to work him into the regular rotation. As for the draft, we should pick the best player available regardless of the position… Oh yeah, bring JChill back as well…

O'brien

June 2nd, 2009
11:00 pm

Acie has not gotten consistent minutes from Woody, and he’s also been hurt a lot. I would hate for him to be traded to another team where he becomes a solid PG off the bench. But if we keep him for a 3rd season, he needs consistent PT from Woody.

If we bring David Andersen over, he would be our backup PF (and we need one). I also like Antonio McDyess (if he will sign with us).

Ed

June 2nd, 2009
11:05 pm

Sekou, do you really think Woody plays Ty Lawson. The one comment I heard about him at pre-draft camp was how small he looked. That’s enought right there to doom him with Woody, not to mention he likes to drive and dish the rock.

rms

June 2nd, 2009
11:06 pm

Hawks not smart enough enough to pull off a savy move!! They’ll probably trade their pick for a backup center

G-Man

June 2nd, 2009
11:35 pm

I agree Ed. Woody seems to only want to play point guards who can shoot as opposed to dishing and driving which is what an uptempo team like us needs.

UGA

June 2nd, 2009
11:40 pm

For the Hawks, you have to be realistic.

They spent 68 million last year on the pay roll and have 40 million invested now.

They can re-sign Bibby, Flip, ZaZa and keep Marvin (which they better do).

Then, if we can trade Speedy’s contract (and maybe Acie Law- which I’m not sure about)— we can sign a Chris Wilcox/Charlie V and get a PG like Ramon Sessions or Jarrett Jack.

We’d then have the same starting 5 of this year which got us a 4 seed, then our next 5 would be:

ZaZa, Wilcox, Mo, Flip, Sessions— much better 5!

Mike is back

June 2nd, 2009
11:41 pm

Sekou, great stuff…thanks for the update. You have given me a reason to hold out hope that Acie may be retained. I remember feeling the same way about Solo last season. I really hope we retain Acie. I keep hearing everyone mentioning Ty Lawson…but we all know Woody hates short guards.

GIVEN the context of your blog…I think it would behoove Sund to pursue a Big first and fore more. I think Hansbrough is a reach at 19th…to big a gamble on a guys that’s shorter than the Bigs we currently have on the roster. I love his energy and game, but he will definitely struggle on defense. I can easily see him getting DNPs with Woody’s switching defense. I’ll take Blair over Hansbrough any day. At lease Blair is a manchild with a 7 foot wing span.

Has Solo name been mentioned in any discussions?

Sekou Smith

June 2nd, 2009
11:43 pm

I don’t know how you’d keep whatever point guard they go with off the floor, Ed. They need a starter and a backup and they both have to get quality minutes. There’s no other way around it. The reason the Hawks are sketchy at that spot right now is because they haven’t handled their business there in the past. This silly cycle has to stop, and I mean now. I’d take McDyess on this team in a heartbeat O’brien. He’d be a great fit.

UGA

June 2nd, 2009
11:50 pm

Does Woodson have some pull maybe to get McDyess from his days in Detroit? What a great locker room guy he would be!!

niremetal

June 3rd, 2009
12:05 am

Sekou,

If Woody wouldn’t play Acie, why would he play Ty? Not being snide. I’m serious…why would it be different this time around?

Will

June 3rd, 2009
12:27 am

Just what is the deal on Speedy? I heard that they were working out a plan on releasing him. Is this true? Sure hope so as it would free up a spot for a backup point guard.

Sekou Smith

June 3rd, 2009
12:33 am

I don’t know that Woodson has any pull with McDyess. But having a pre-existing relationship can’t hurt.

And the reason Woody has no wiggle room on playing time for his point guard Nire is because there is a different front office team in place now. And Woody is going to be as vested in whatever player they pick as the GM (which was not the case during the Billy Knight era. I know for a fact that they clashed on draft picks repeatedly during that time). It’s actually the best way to do business if you’re the team, because you need your coach and GM on the same personnel page.

Speedy is outta here Will. How that happens should come into clearer focus on draft night. The Hawks have options, including packaging Speed-O’s expiring contract with other assets and moving him.

niremetal

June 3rd, 2009
12:48 am

Ah. Well that makes sense, definitely. Man I’d love to be a fly on the wall of any meeting where Woody and Sund discuss draft choices…

darrell starks

June 3rd, 2009
12:51 am

Trade the pick im tired of hearing the same excuse talking about where still young why do we continue to settle for less when it come to the sports in this city you cant win a championship unless you have batman and robin and the last i look we have nuna.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 3rd, 2009
12:58 am

Go get Bosh we need a young up and coming star with some in side presents who command double team in the post.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 3rd, 2009
1:09 am

If arthur blank was the owner of the hawks we would have kobe lebron cp3 brandon roy dwade dhoward yo ming the hole team would be nothing but stars and avery johnson would be the coach but sense we have ASG we have to nick pick on every thing because of money thats why the hawks will never win a nba title.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
1:17 am

<em “because you need your coach and GM on the same personnel page.”

Yes, Yes, and Yes. Don’t understand why that’s so difficult for some people to understand.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
1:30 am

Glad to hear Speedy is out of here. Hope he enjoys good health elsewhere, and that we get something useful out of moving him.

I have to chuckle about the idea of going forward with Law. I’m okay with him going or staying. If he goes, we will have to get ourselves another pg.

I wonder what the thinking is on Law as far as Woody vs. Sund? Are they both “on the same page?” I can only imagine what they both think as far as the draft goes.

Tyler Hansbrough is a hard-nosed, heady player. He will be a decent-to-good pickup for just about any team that gets him (and properly utilizes him).

I like the idea of picking up a pg, but we all know the usual concerns about that. We might want to start looking at a replacement for Joe’s spot. We don’t know for certain what will happen with Joe. He could test the free agent market, and any number of teams would love to have him, especially if they already have one or two OTHER solid scoring options.

If BJ Mullens is available at #19, I can see Sund falling all over himself to take him. For those of you who think Woody would’ve ruined certain other very talented draft picks in the past, Mullens is your perfect fall-guy situation, if you ask me. Mullens is as raw as a freshly scabbed knee….

Flynn and Lawson will not fall this far, I think. Both guys are “undersized”, but I think teams know what they need these days: a court general. Not only that, but there are other “undersized” guards who seem to be doing just fine. Aaron Brooks, anybody?

cp

June 3rd, 2009
1:30 am

Melvin I have been talking about Terrence Williams for a few weeks now. He can play some 2 and 3. Very athletic, can rebound, can play some defense. He could end up being what we thought Mo was going to be. Sam Young is another guy I have been doing my homework on. He is already 24 or 25 though I think so at this point he probably is what he is going to be. If the other kid from Louisville falls, Ed we should jump all over him. I just dont see us taking a pg. The guys that will be available are smaller than Law, are more uptempo type guards and we all know how Woody feels about that, and only Lawson shot a high percentage. Lawson also has a low release so I don’t know how that will translate over to the pros. This is going to be a big summer for us. We can easily slide if Sund does not handle his business.

cp

June 3rd, 2009
1:32 am

Ed Clark I think is the kids name.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
1:35 am

You know, the more I think about it, the more I have to wonder just how often Sund and Woodson could even BE on the same page, especially where draft picks are concerned. How much does/should Sund value Woody’s perspective on draft picks?

Being on the same page is an easy thing to say. But who’s page are we talking about, if there is a disagreement? Does Sund say “ok Woody, we’ll go with who you think we should get”, or does he say “this is who we need, and this is who I’m picking. Play him. Develop him. Make it work.” Should there be some sort of compromise?

Perhaps Sund is committed to this relationship. Perhaps he is simply bidding his time and sharpening his guillotine blade. Who knows.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
1:39 am

Darrell Starks,

If Blank owned the Hawks, this whole franchise would be different. Well, assuming he owned the Hawks and NOT the Falcons. But it would be different. Think Donnie Walsh instead of Rick Sund. Think…well, think somebody other than Woody. I’m just sayin’….But uh…let’s not smoke that stuff. We’ll only cry when we wake up from passing out and realize it was all quite literally just a pipe dream.

cp

June 3rd, 2009
1:40 am

My bad his name is Earl Clark lol. ray honestly I wouldn’t even trust Woodsons judgment on talent. This is the same guy who didn’t think highly of Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Rondo, and etc.

BarkingBulldawg

June 3rd, 2009
2:03 am

I agree with let it go regarding Marvin/CP3, Sekou. Why don’t you forward the memo to some of your colleagues (namely Bradley) or was this a carefully veiled shot at him anyways?

HawkKingBibby

June 3rd, 2009
2:05 am

SEKOU YOUR WRONG THEIR IS KRYPTONITE FOR SUPERMAN AND ITS NAME IS JOSH SMITH. Ok maybe I am crazy but Smoove has had some games where he and Al have made Dwight look human. At least when he brings that Smoove swagger and wanted to dominate on defense. As for Zaza he had a nice year and I wouldnt mind him back but I dont think he is the most important guy to retain. He had a lousy year before the Boston series and I am not so certain his hustle came because he was playing for a deal. He looked useless vs the Cavs.

Ed

June 3rd, 2009
3:51 am

Now this is a Woody type of PG IMO

19) Atlanta Hawks: Jeff Teague, PG, 6-2, 180, Wake Forest, Sophomore, 18.8 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 3.5 apg, 1.9 spg, 48.5% FG, 44.1% 3FG

Inside Hoops has the Hawks making this pick

JustaThought

June 3rd, 2009
7:00 am

The draft’s not going to matter. Woodson is from the Larry Brown school of not playing/developing young talent. He teaches them by making them watch (which basicly just destroys there confidence), so whoever the Hawks draft it’s not going to matter. I know you saying I’m full of sh%t, what about Horford, JSmoove and Marvin……….well believe it or not, Woody’s not completely stupid. If the other team rolls 5 out to play, he’s smart enough to roll 5 out to match.

Reggie

June 3rd, 2009
7:54 am

Sekou

So you’re saying the reason Mike Woodson didn’t play Acie Law alot was because he didn’t want to draft him? Also how would guys like Eric Maynor & Jeff Teague fit on this team if we draft one of them?

chuckw/deadjournalist

June 3rd, 2009
7:57 am

Big Ray –

You’re point about Woodson/Sund and their ability to be on the same page is spot-on. With no picks last year and a pick deep in the draft this year, the scenario is quick a bit different that the years of picking in the top 6. Picking 19th is much more of a crap shoot. Doing some quick research, there hasn’t been an impact player taken at 19 since 2001. That was Zach Randolph. Going back 15 years, the only other All Star player taken was Jamaal Magloire in 2000 (and he’s selection was a fluke). Point being most of the guys at 19 had successful careers has role player or were three-and-done guys.

By the way, ndadraft.net’s updated mock (as of today) has the Hawks taking Tyler Hansbrough at 19.

Pete A

June 3rd, 2009
8:15 am

Great column Sekou… I’ve been telling all my basketball friends that Pachulia is the second most important free agent behind Flip. There is no backup center at that quality and price. Imagine having Ben Wallace and that contract!

There’s not alot of talk about this, but why aren’t the Hawks targeting Raymond Felton? I think he fits perfectly for Woodson’s offense as a point that hits open 3’s and isn’t the half court conduit. It doesn’t look like Carolina will match offers with Augustin on the team.

Mike

June 3rd, 2009
9:23 am

I agree with you on all counts, Sekou (especially the point about Chris Paul). The Acie situation is a real problem. He has shown flashes when he’s had a chance to play, but that hasn’t been often and he has gotten hurt. If you resign Bibby and keep Acie, when would a rookie PG play? On the other hand, Acie hasn’t been healthy enough to be a reliable backup.

As for trades, it’s hard to imagine what they could do. They do have Speedy’s expiring contract, but Joe and Josh Smith are untouchable (despite what so many people say in these blogs); Marvin can’t be traded until July even if they did a sign-and-trade; same for Josh Childress; practically everyone else except Acie and Mo Evans are free agents, and it will be hard to trade Acie with so many good PGs in the draft.

newkid

June 3rd, 2009
9:40 am

Full of nuggets Sekou. Good job!

Over the past few weeks you’ve mentioned quite ardently that Speedy is outta here. Don’t think I recall you ever speaking as definitively about a player move you suspect (for good reasons I must guess) is sure to occur. Here you’ve mentioned a draft night move involving Speedy. Is this the Sekou crystal ball, or do you have ‘higher’ information that gives you sufficient comfort to make such a pronouncement?

About the Marvin thing you appear convinced is dead horse beating, could it be that many are less concerned about that particular fiasco, and more concerned that it was a symptom of an underlying failed talent evaluation system that may still be largely in tact with our Hawks? If in fact the system and associated thought processes continue to florish in ASG land, why should we not continue to be concerned? After all, it is (was?) a talent evaluation system that produced many more failures than simply missing on CP3 and Deron Williams, isn’t it? If it’s still in place, couldn’t it just as easily continue to produce failures? If it’s changed, tell us how; then maybe we’ll leave the issue(s) alone.

You said “I know everyone is always interested in upgrading. But sometimes it’s not nearly as easy you might think…” Interesting how you structure this. So are we to pursue upgrading only if it’s easy? Why should we expect the all out pursuit of the Larry O’Brien trophy to be easy? If it’s determined that we NEED an upgrade to Zaza to advance to the next level, then whether it’s easy or not is irrelevant, isn’t it? Get it done or go away and allow someone else to get it done.

Just sayin’…

David Smith

June 3rd, 2009
9:57 am

Dag Sekou, you would have to bring up Shelden (zombie) Williams when talking about our futility in drafting a big man. The Hawks have never had much luck in drafting a good post player (Tree Rollins, Jon Koncak, and horrible Priest Lauderdale) and i hope that we will address that need in free agency due to the lack of big bodies in this years draft. Rick Sund will have to make a Thomas Dimitroff like splash this year by picking up some key pieces to keep this team winning and the Spirit group must resolve their issue with Belkin in court,

Turd Ferguson

June 3rd, 2009
9:58 am

Hawks/thugs got they butts kicked…LMAO!!

bushwacker

June 3rd, 2009
10:04 am

The Hawks need to seriously go after LeBron, he wants out of Cleveland and the Hawks already have the talent he needs around him to win a championship, think about, where will he have a better chance to win it all, New York, I don’t think so, not with their current lineup, or ATL??

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
10:15 am

LBJ is a crybaby chump…..forget about that oversized munchkin

6′8 Gerald Green is unrestricted. He hasn’t done anything in his career…….He will come for the minimum. I think it’s worth a look anyway. A one year contract…..he’s better than what’s been at the end of our bench lately…

O'brien

June 3rd, 2009
10:48 am

Sekou, do you think the Hawks will try to extend JJ before his contract expires? Next offseason, if a team loses out on Lebron, Bosh, Wade, etc., they might come after JJ as a consolation prize. And if I am Cleveland, after addressing the frontcourt this offseason, I’m looking at JJ to be Robin to Lebron’s batman.

How ironic would it be if JJ signs somewhere else, while the Hawks are still stuck in an ownership battle…

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
10:53 am

Does anyone else find it fishy that Austin Daye tested at last week’s NBA Draft Combine in Chicago as the slowest, least athletic player in the entire Draft class?

It wasn’t a shock that the Gonzaga sophomore forward was the only player who couldn’t even lift the 185-pound bench press once. After all, he’s 6-foot-10 and only 192 pounds. But, when has Daye ever been described as extremely slow and unathletic? He did it all for Gonzaga over the past two seasons. He scored inside and outside, handled the ball, scored and dished in transition, threw down exciting dunks, blocked shots, and really gave Gonzaga a long, versatile player in its lineup.

Daye has loads of potential to be a terrific player in the NBA. He has Rashard Lewis, Tayshaun Prince, Lamar Odom, Thaddeus Young and Josh Howard (insert any other long, versatile small forward here) written all over him.

NBA executives have been raving lately about how impressive Daye has been in workouts. He’s been praised for his ability to do so many things exceptionally well. He’s been steadily rising up draft boards over the past few weeks. And he’s certainly impressive in interviews.

If everyone has been so excited about Daye, how is it possible that he tested as the slowest, most unathletic player out of EVERY SINGLE PLAYER at the Draft Combine?

To be fair, Hasheem Thabeet didn’t participate in the testing, and Ricky Rubio and Brandon Jennings weren’t in Chicago. But that doesn’t change much. Hopefully, for Daye’s sake, Thabeet is slower than Daye, but he would still then be the second slowest, the weakest, and the most unathletic player at the Combine.

Daye’s no-step vertical was 25 inches. The only player with a lower no-step vertical was Maryland guard Greivis Vasquez, who had a 24.5. Taj Gibson and Omri Casspi were next with 25.5.

Daye’s max vertical tested at 28 inches, which was tied with Vasquez as the absolute lowest at the Combine. No other player tested at less than 30 inches (Taj Gibson measured at 30).

As stated above, the bench press issue was no surprise. Daye is easily the skinniest player in this Draft class and he showed by not being able to lift the 185-pound bar once. Vasquez lifted the bar just one time, while Casspi did two reps.

When it came to the lane agility test, which tested players’ speed moving quickly in various directions around the lane, Jordan Hill (12.23 seconds) was the only player who finished slower than Daye (12.11 seconds).

The 3/4 court sprint is just a straight sprint down the court. Daye’s 3.5 seconds was good enough for dead last. Vasquez finished .02 seconds faster. Even BJ Mullens and DeJuan Blair (3.45 seconds) were faster than Daye.

Greivis Vasquez is a whole different issue. Most wouldn’t guess he’s the strongest, most athletic guy on the court at any time, but it’s going to be tough to play point guard in the NBA without being able to beat centers up and down the court.

But this is about Daye, the guy who has been so impressive lately in his workouts.

Is Daye really slower and less athletic than the likes of Blair, Mullens, Luke Harangody and Jeff Adrien? Is he really the slowest, weakest, least athletic player in the entire 2009 NBA Draft class?

Or was Austin Daye dogging it?

Was he told by an NBA team to perform as poorly as he could in order to make other teams not want to draft him because that certain team doesn’t want him to be drafted before that team’s pick?

Would Daye really do that?

Think about it. How many solid first round, maybe even lottery, prospects have ever been the worst or second worst in every single test? It’s one thing if he was only the weakest or only the slowest or only the least athletic, but all three?

We’re not talking about an out of shape big man here. We’re talking about Austin Daye.

Can a wing player who is the slowest, weakest, most unathletic player in the entire Draft class be a lottery pick? Apparently, it might be possible.

The question really isn’t whether or not a player like that could be a lottery pick. It’s whether or not the player in question is really what he made himself out to be last week in Chicago.

OTHER COMBINE TESTING SURPRISES AND NOTES

Stephen Curry did very well at the Combine, much better than most would have expected. He measured at a legit 6-foot-3 in shoes and 181 pounds, which is heavier than Patty Mills, Darren Collison, Jeff Teague and Eric Maynor, and only two pounds lighter than Toney Douglas.

Curry’s biggest knock has been that he is weak. Well, the former Davidson guard bench pressed 185 pounds 10 times, the same as Jonny Flynn, BJ Mullens and Tyler Smith, and more than Terrence Williams, Gerald Henderson, Tyreke Evans, Jrue Holiday and Earl Clark.

People also have said that Curry is unathletic. Well, he registered a 35.5 inch max vertical, more than Henderson, Evans, Holiday, Clark and Sam Young.

Curry did everything perfect at the Combine. He tested well, shot well and interviewed well. He could easily find himself in the top five when the Draft rolls around.

Who had the highest max vertical? It wasn’t DeMar DeRozan, Gerald Henderson, Jermaine Taylor, Blake Griffin, Derrick Brown or Tyler Smith. To the surprise of many, the only player at the Combine with a true 40 inch vertical was Jonny Flynn.

There was a lot of debate in Chicago about which point guard was the fastest of the bunch. The names thrown around were Darren Collison, Ty Lawson, Patty Mills, or maybe even Jonny Flynn. But, none of them were even the second fastest. Toney Douglas blazed through the 3/4 court sprint with an impressive 3.03 seconds, while even more surprising was the fact that Damion James was second with a 3.09. Matching Lawson and Mills’s time of 3.1 was the out-of-nowhere Jodie Meeks.

Everyone knows Blake Griffin and DeJuan Blair are beasts, but how about Luke Harangody and Derrick Brown? Harangody topped Griffin by one (23-22) for the most bench presses. That shows how hard Harangody has been working lately to get in incredible shape. Brown was third with 20 reps. The Xavier forward is not only strong and athletic, but fast, finishing with a 3.13 in the 3/4 court sprint.

Watch out for Rodrigue Beaubois, the young French point guard who is looking to make a name for himself in the NBA. He measured just an inch short of Flynn with a 39 inch vertical. The 6-foot-2 guard has a 6′ 9.75″ wingspan and had the third quickest lane agility time with a 10.49.

Former high school teammates and college rivals Wayne Ellington and Gerald Henderson both participated at the Draft Combine. Ellington has always been known as the shooter, while Henderson is the athletic one. But how about the fact that Ellington measured a 38 inch vertical, while Henderson had just a 35.5? What’s that all about? Who knew that Ellington was one of the most athletic players in this Draft class? Shooters can be deceiving. Ellington’s vertical is much like Jodie Meeks’ speed, as Meeks came in as the third fastest player at the Combine.

Link:

http://www.thehoopsreport.com/article.aspx?id=273

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
11:02 am

In the 2008 Olympics, as the youngest player in the history of Australian basketball, Mills averaged a team-best 14.2 points a game and had two assists and 1.7 steals in 23 minutes. As a 19-year-old, leading a team with players mostly in their mid-30s, Mills went for 20 points, three assists, two steals and no turnovers in the quarterfinals against the U.S. team.

Link:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/01/SPUM17V3VO.DTL

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
11:18 am

Chuckw/deadjournalist,

Yeah, I saw that on nbadraft.net. I’m still trying to decide whether I”m ok with that or not.

Here’s my take on Hansbrough: he’ll be one heck of a better pick at that slot than Sheldon was at #5 (or even at the same slot). I think Hansbrough has the confidence, toughness, and IQ that we wanted in 2006. He’s limited in some ways, but everybody is. The guy measures out to about a half inch shorter than Horford, and weighs 234. That’s big enough to play PF, and he’s pretty strong as well. Maybe not Dejuan Blair strong (overall), but he’s no slouch. I’ll say this: he had as many reps on the bench press as Blair did. Yep…

He’s got a decent post game, and will be able to score in the NBA despite his average (or worse, depending on who you talk to) athleticism. He won’t get to the line in the NBA nearly as much as he did in college, but when he DOES get there, he’ll hit the free throws.

On defense, he probably won’t block a lot of shots or get any other fancy defensive stats. But he’ll probably do what Horford does, and what is the very building block of defense: keep his opponent from getting good position. That, and he will hustle like a demon on the boards. On BOTH ends.

I’m betting his toughness, IQ, and sound fundamentals will make him a great role player, and solid part of somebody’s rotation. Think…maybe….a larger Matt Harpring, without the jumpshot (not that the shot can’t be improved). He’s a team-first type of guy, as he showed throughout the tournament, backing off his normal scoring in certain games, for the better of the team. Also, he plays under control. Very coachable.

If we draft him, we need to use him. I think he’s a guy that will prove that he should be a part of the regular rotation. I can see Sund going for a guy like this. As for Woody, I have no idea what that guy thinks. Really.

Meanwhile, Draftexpress has us taking Earl Clark of Louisville.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
11:25 am

Clark is a guy with one of the dreaded tags: lots of potential or upside. He’s turnover prone. Here’s a quick tidbit from draftexpress.com:

“Given Clark’s lack of efficiency across the board, the team that picks him will be banking on him utilizing his athleticism to his advantage to create mismatches and develop the type of consistency he’ll need to be productive.”

Okay, that about sums it up for me. We already have one forward that shoots jumpers more than he should (although that idea changes once he develops and refines that jumper), and another who we don’t give the ball to enough and won’t take charge.

Clark only fits here, metaphorically speaking that is, if Billy Knight is the GM. He ain’t. If there’s one thing I think Sund and Woody are likely to agree on, it’s NOT taking Earl Clark. Woody won’t want him, and Sund won’t see the point in adding Solo 2.0….offensive potential or not.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
11:27 am

Newkid,

That was one hell of a post at 9:40 a.m. Bravo!

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
11:37 am

Ariose,

Interesting stuff. I have no idea what’s up with Austin Daye. I’ll bet damn near anything we don’t pick him though, lol!

Johnny Flynn is going to be a beast in the NBA, I think. NBAdraft.net has Ty Lawson and Jrue Holiday going 22nd and 24th. I say both will go sooner than that, but what do I know..

Hawksgirl

June 3rd, 2009
11:43 am

Does flip play two positions? If he does he is good to have. But as for the draft hansbrough looks pretty good to me. Good to see speedy being let go, he needs to just retire. I love him but he just doesnt have his legs anymore.

newkid

June 3rd, 2009
11:52 am

Sekou Smith

June 3rd, 2009
11:59 am

Reggie, I’m saying that when a coach, any coach, isn’t fully invested in having a player in his rotation his decision not to play him becomes that much easier. I think it was pretty clear that Salim Stoudamire wasn’t Mike Woodson’s choice and their relationship reflected as much.

So, again, whatever point guard(s) the Hawks add to the roster this summer has to be an important part of the rotation. There is no wiggle room.

Paul

June 3rd, 2009
12:13 pm

*Sekou*, what’s your feeling on trades this off-season? Could our FO trade either Horford, Marvin, or Smith? Do you feel that Sund/Woodson would try to pull off a trade for Rubio (MEM needs PF; we need another star)?

I know there can’t be much substantive – Sund plays things very close to the vest – but just your general feeling would be nice…

Sekou Smith

June 3rd, 2009
12:25 pm

Paul, I haven’t a clue until I get another chance to browbeat the Hawks’ brass when they come back from the draft workout tour.

F.I.L.A.

June 3rd, 2009
12:32 pm

Sekou please believe me when I say this MARVIN WILLIAMS WILL BE AN ALL-STAR VERY SOON!!!

Yall have got 2 wake up and see the kids talent and superstar potential..If the hawks trade him we will regret it forever…Please trust me on this Ive watch ball all my life and i know talent..Hes got “IT” and will be in this league 4 a long time..Lets make it known 2 the front office MARVIN HAS 2 STAY..

F.I.L.A.

June 3rd, 2009
12:32 pm

Enter your comments here

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
12:34 pm

Sekou,

Great point. The question comes in what happens when the GM and coach disagree about said player.

But of course, as Astro Joe illustrated, there should be no problem with an employer (Sund), telling his employee (Woody) to play a guy.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
12:39 pm

F.I.L.A.,

I’m sure Marvin appreciates your sentiments. But until Marvin graduates from the 4th scoring option on the team, he’s not going to be anything other than another SF. While you’re writing a letter to the front office about Marvin’s impending elevation to stardom, include a note about getting him the ball more…

Samuel

June 3rd, 2009
12:40 pm

From what I saw, Tyler Hansbrough was the 3rd best player on the Tar Heels’ team this year behind Lawson and Ellington. We need a point guard and more scoring. Why would we draft a “tweener” like Hansbrough with Lawson and Ellington still on the board?

Astro Joe

June 3rd, 2009
12:44 pm

Sekou, Salim played 20 minutes a game in his rookie season. That sounds like a lot to me, especially for a 2nd round draft pick. The next season, he received 17 minutes per game. He disappeared from Woody’s radar in his thrid season. Could there have been another issue at work other than Salim not being “Woddy;s choice”? Or did BK “influence” Woody to play Salim in those first two years?

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/stats?playerId=2786

Interesting dynamic, to have a lame-duck coach play an instrumental role in choosing players who may not be ready to make a significant contribution in his last contractual year. If, for example, the choice comes down to a jump-shooting PG (like Woody seemingly prefers) and a penetrating PG, will Sund opt for the guy Woody prefers? There are plenty of examples of quality PGs drafted around 19 (or later) who needed time to learn how to shoot before they reached their potential. Would Sund pass up a potential Tony Parker and choose a Dan Dickau to appease his short-term coach?

GA.BOY72

June 3rd, 2009
1:00 pm

I think Andre Miller would be a great addition to the Hawks, also C.V he has size and also a “lil” swagg…. Draft B.J Mullens if he is there the kid has UPSIDE!!!! He can grow along with Horford.

Ernest

June 3rd, 2009
1:17 pm

Sekou, great blog! Also glad to hear that everyone in the organization has not given up on Acie. I thought he was playing well while starting his first year until he go injured in the Charlotte game. I also had hope when he got a LOT of playing time in the pre-season this past year. For some reason, that did not translate to the regular season. I think all he is lacking now in confidence as he seems to play ‘looking at the bench’, hoping that a mistake does not result in being subbed for. That is not the way to play the game.

It was also good hear a definitive statement regarding Speedy’s status. The Hawks have assets that can be leveraged to improve our team. Speedy’s contract along with a player and/or draft pick could bring back a contributor to the team.

I’ll also admit I had higher hopes for Morris. He looked like a lumbering big body whenever he entered the game. Have we seen the best of him or is there room for improvement?

chuckw/deadjournalist

June 3rd, 2009
1:21 pm

Big Ray –

Personally, it would take a lot for me to buy into Hansbrough as the pick, despite the fact that everything you outline and everything I’ve read coming out of the combine defines the type of role player the Hawks need to develop to maintain their standing as a play-off caliber team. With that said, I still like Patty Mills at the pick if he is available. Hansbrough wouldn’t create a match-up problem for other team’s second units. Mills could.

A lot of players can look good in International games only to have their games not transition to the NBA. Usually it is because a player has a limited offensive repertoire or because they are play the game more methodically (read: slower) than their counterparts. Once the league has the M.O. on a guy, they can defensive him appropriately. Mills has speed and quickness, which is more difficultly defended. Additionally, his role in a leadership capacity on Olympic teams can’t be discounted at a position which should define on-court leadership.

That said, if he slips, I do not see him getting by the Lakers at the end of the first round.

Sekou Smith

June 3rd, 2009
1:28 pm

The Hawks, when healthy, are one of the few teams capable of matching up with the Magic’s size across the frontline (Dwight and Al, Turkoglu and Marvin and Rashard and Josh). The Magic’s group is better, but the Hawks can at least contend with them. But can you imagine that group with Charlie Villanueva in the mix? I saw him on the tube this morning and I’m telling you, that’s my guy this summer. I’ve had others in the past (the whole Ridnour thing is something I’m willing to reconsider at this point). But I won’t budge from Charlie V.

Daniel

June 3rd, 2009
1:36 pm

I still like Lawson at 19, but honestly, I would consider trading down and getting Toney Douglas. I know he doesn’t fit a “need”, but he is mature and ready to contribute. He could be a backcourt Shane Battier.
I agree that people really need to get over the whole CP3/ Marvin deal. First, NOBODY really was clamoring for Paul over Williams, although it seems like now EVEYONE knew Paul would turn out to be the better player. Also, last I check Chris Paul hasn’t done any better than Marvin in terms of team progress. The truth is CP3 is a semi-AI and look at that guys career. Chris Paul will never lead a team to a championship. Marvin has played well and I like him as a player. I do see him as a valuable trade piece however. I remain concerned about that back injury. I would be hesistant to give him long term money. But anyone who continues to say I would have taken CP3 over Marvin is a liar. Most of us considered Marvin, Deron Williams and Chris Paul to all be around the same level at the time. So just keep that junk to yourselves.

ILL-logical

June 3rd, 2009
1:36 pm

Sekou, both you and Mr. Bradley are pointing out two sides of the same problem: which direction will the Hawks go in after raising the bar with this season’s performance( up to but excluding Cleveland).

Your take: now that Dwight Howard’s play overshadowed The Chosen One, every team will be focusing on a strong post presence is spot on. And that that makes ZaZa more valuable to the Hawks/ other teams is precisely why it is so frustrating at the lack of development of ANY of the Hawks bigs; some of whom have both heft and height.

I hope that whatever page Sund and Woodson claim that they are mutually sharing includes some clear mandates to develop the talent that they have before engaging in the type of self serving actions that neither of them have historically proven to be adept at.

ant banks

June 3rd, 2009
1:54 pm

sekou, where do you have charlie v playin’? startin’ or comin’ off the bench? what will we lose to get ‘em

O'brien

June 3rd, 2009
2:07 pm

Sekou, I’m a big Charlie V fan as well. I also like his versatility, because he can play backup minutes at the 3 and the 4.

Would the Hawks be able to sign him outright? (Bucks do not want to spend too much money, plus they want to keep Sessions as well).

doc

June 3rd, 2009
2:17 pm

ray tyler reminds me of the type player that matt harpring is a guy who will be smart and play basketball above his ability. he will stay in the league a long time, just not a star. i like him.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
2:20 pm

Astro Joe,

To be fair, Woody did give Stoudamire good minutes. I figure Billy probably did put the pressure on him to do so. But it also seems that Stoudamire would be right up Woody’s alley. You know, as you said-a pg who jacks it from the outside.

Only problem was, Salim never was a pg, and he was close to useless on the defensive end. Not trying to bash the guy, but he just didn’t fit here. I mean, Bibby’s not a very good defender either, but he has other skills/intangibles that Salim just didn’t have. I saw Salim as an Eddie House type. A shooting guard in a pg’s body. Stoudamire may yet find a role like House. But that may never have worked here.

One other reason I think Stoudamire got so much playing time was the same reason Law got decent playing time at first: there were no credible/consistently effective veteran pgs here at the time (Bibby, Flip). Once Bibby arrived, it was all over but the injuries for Law. Woody never said one word about Law playing or anything of the sort, until Bibby got sick. Then and only then did he talk about how nice it would have been to have Law available. It is what it is.

I have to wonder just how much Woody’s perspective is being considered in the upcoming moves. We may or may not be able to judge where this is going by the moves Sund makes.

LaBronHandshaker

June 3rd, 2009
2:21 pm

Its amazing to see the man of steel (superman) Dwight Howard in the finals. He is a great talent and the perfect center for the Magic, a team of gifted athletes and accurate shooters. However, the Lakers are a much more experienced team having made the finals last year and with the best closer and finisher in the game (Kobe Bryant), its about time for the Lakers to make the Magic disappear. Lakers in six with a huge serving of Kryptonite.

Melvin

June 3rd, 2009
2:22 pm

Sekou,

You’re Johnny-come-late to the Charlie V express. Check your old blogs, I convey during the season that the Hawks need to persue him this offseason. He could be our supersub playing mins at the 3,4 and 5 spots. Welcome aboard Sekou…..

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
2:27 pm

Doc,

I like him, too. I think he’s a good pickup for any team. Whether he’s the best choice for us depends on a number of factors, including who is available by the time we pick.

Chuckw/deadjournalist,

I agree. I think Hansbrough is a good pick for us if we can’t get a better impact player. True, he does not present a matchup problem for any team’s second unit. But if the guys we can best use are already gone, then we have to go with whoever helps us the most at that spot. In reality, I’d rather take a guard, more specifically a point guard.

I really haven’t seen enough of Mills to agree or disagree about taking him. I figure he makes the first round, especially if he’s as good as people say he is. But, the usual concerns abound with taking a pg. If we take one, it has to work out with Woody (assuming he’s around for the long haul), and whoever it is has to come into the league with enough confidence, and work hard to stay healthy.

I don’t know how much of a contributor we’ll get at this pick, but the good news is that this draft is loaded with pgs if we want one. Of course, we’re also having to be realistic: no guy we grab at #19 is likely to be starting this year or next, so no need to be worried about that. But like Sekou said, we need to solidify the pg position, and do so soon. The draft is one way to do that, when thinking about the future, that is.

Daniel

June 3rd, 2009
2:29 pm

Sekou- I like the Charlie V. call, but how about Brandon Bass?
doc- I like the comparison of Hansborough to Harpring. I think it is accurate.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
2:35 pm

Samuel,

If I recall correctly (and I might be wrong), Sund said that he leans toward picking the best talent available when picking this low in the first round. If that’s the case (and he’s not flat crazy), then no way does he take Hansbrough over Lawson or Ellington. He would have to believe that Hansbrough would contribute more either right away or in time (read: starter or sixth man) than either Lawson or Ellington. I don’t see how he could arrive at that conclusion, but I’ve seen stranger things. Dude is known for having a…ahem…”affection” for bigs come draft time, but I can’t see him screwing this one up (unless Billy Knight put something nasty in his drink that day he had him up in the executive suite during the playoffs).

Question: Which would you take – Lawson or Ellington? I say Lawson for now…I’ll explain later.

O’brien,

I agree with you and Sekou on Charlie Villanueva. He’s a for real threat on offense. Sure torched us a couple of times. I can only imagine what it would be like, having him come off the bench for 27-30 mpg and dropping 15+ ppg. Or more. Imagine him and Flip doing their thing for us.

And if I’m Milwaukee, I keep Sessions over Charlie V. Why? Their only other option is Luke Ridnour. Exactly. Unless of course, they think they will be picking up their pg of the future in the draft. Maybe. But I’d still want to keep Sessions as an insurance policy. Ridnour can’t stay two things: healthy and effective.

Big Ray

June 3rd, 2009
2:38 pm

Tyler Hansbrough might turn out to be a better player in the NBA than many project him to be. If he’s anything like David Lee, he’s gonna be a steal.

Does that mean he’s the right pick for us, or the best fit for us? No, it does not. But that’s something Sund and his crew will have to figure out.

I’m wondering whether or not Sund will try to move up in the draft.

Melvin

June 3rd, 2009
3:00 pm

Big Ray,

Hansbrough does not have the skills set of Harping or Lee. Those guys can put the ball on the floor to get to the hoop. Hansbrough is more of a back to the basket type player. However, I do agree he has an high IQ, very active on the court and will be in the pros for years to come. With that said, I don’t like him at #19. If he end up in a Hawks uni, then I will support him otherwise I prefer a player with more offensive skills…

I think the draft will determine which RFA (Charlie or Sessions) the Bucks will keep. If they go PG, then Charlie stays as Sessions hits the road of if they go big the Sessions stays and Charlie hits the pavement. Hopefully Blair is their guy although its reported that they are very high on Flynn. ..

Ken Strickland

June 3rd, 2009
3:04 pm

If the Hawks successfully resign Bibby and Flip, it won’t matter if we draft a PG or not because he won’t get more mins, consideration, consistent or better treatment from Woodson than ALaw or SStaudamire received from him. Retaining Woodson guarantees we’ll continue having PG problems. He feels obligated to Bibby for leading the Hawks to the playoffs after the trade, AND SAVING HIS JOB.

With Bibby you get no DEF, penetration and limited easy baskets for your BIG’s. With Flip, you have the teams best one on one player who has the ability to penetrate against almost anyone. However, he needs the ball to be effective and he doesn’t use that penetrating ability to get easy baskets for his teammates. Considering how many mins(24.7) he averaaged, his 2.0 APG is really low for a SG/PG that controls the ball and penetrates as much as he does. Our C-Horford, SG-JJ and PG-Bibby averaged more APG than Flip, and even ALaw averaged 1.6 APG and he avg only 10.2 very inconsistent mins.

If we don’t resign Bibby, and draft a PG, Sund has to make certain Woodson doesn’t use the same old school bullying tactics against him that he used against Salim and Acie. That’s why I suggested we go after the Bulls PG Heinrick because he’s a younger, bigger, quicker, faster version of Bibby, except he plays much, much, much better DEF. He can help the team consistently play uptempo, and he shoots well enough to make us effective playing halfcourt.

Since Sund and/or the SAASG have decided to stay in bed with Woodson for at least one more yr, they need to do everything possible to help him be successful. That means we should go all out to resign Zaza, Chills and Flip. Then they should go all out trade for Heinrich and sign AMcDyess to a FA contract. That would leave us with the following lineup.

PG-KHeinrick
SG-JJohnson
SF-MWilliams
PF-JSmith
C–AHorford

BENCH
C—–ZPachulia
C/PF–AMcDyess
SF/SG-JChildress
SG/PG-RMurray
PG—-ALaw
PF—-OHunter, Charlie V or Draft pick(s)

If the Hawks expect to duplicate their recent success, they’ll have to walk a thin line between Woodson tactics and OFF/DEF schemes and the players that are added to the roster.

bigdave

June 3rd, 2009
3:58 pm

Charlie V. huh Sekou…? interesting…

cp, im big on Sam Young… the boy has a nice game… id have him and Toney D. on my board…

#21=Top50,1stBallot

June 3rd, 2009
4:15 pm

Ken,

You might want to check Hinrich’s contract- the word bohemuth comes to mind (and not in that Rashard “overpaying me adds the missing piece to the puzzle” Lewis good way). Plus his game is not all that similar to Bibby honestly, though he is a solid- if unspectacular- offensive player, and exponentially better defensively (who isn’t).

KevinA

June 3rd, 2009
4:18 pm

Mario, Evans, Flip, Acie, Bibby, Hunter, Gardner, Speedy and two draft picks are sign and trade bait or time to let go. We will also have two draft picks for next year.

Flip and Bibby are good players but do we really want to stay with the same old jump shooting offense. We need a starting PG that can push the ball more effectively and play much better defense.
Flip and Bibby put up a huge volume of shots at a poor shooting percentage. They seem to shoot first instead of looking to pass to the front court first. I will add JJ to this list if we can get equal talent in return. A trade for talent that would drive and play equally as good defense. As posted before all three shoot below .440 in shooting percentage together. We need .475 to go to the next level.

JJ, Marvin, Chills, Josh, Al, ZaZa, Solo, and Morris are the core to keep for next year.
Chills, Josh, Marvin and Al run like the dickens and finish well. We need a PG that can match their energy.

KevinA

June 3rd, 2009
4:21 pm

If we resign ZaZa and Solo I think were fine. Solo has much upside potential. I wish we would play Solo with Al to see how Al does at PF. I would also like to see the experiment of Josh at the three.

Randolph Morris has not had a chance to show what he has. Our need for big’s might be overblown. Maybe they just need playing time.

I don’t see how we can get a better front court for the money.

cp

June 3rd, 2009
4:33 pm

bigdave I have a few guys on my list.. Terrance Williams, Earl Clark, and Sam Young… I think either one of these guys could really help this team..

Daniel please tell me you are playing with the comments you made about CP3. I think the first year he played for the Hornets they won like 20 or 30 more games than they did the previous year. How is he anything like AI? CP3 makes his teammates better. I have yet to hear anyone say that about AI. The Hornets don’t really have that much talent when you look at them but Paul makes that team so much better. I know people say we should get over it but please don’t act like that kid has not made a great impact on that team. Hell at one point last year people thought Chills should have been starting over Marvin. Chris Paul wont ever take his team to a championship but Marvin will? Lmaooooooooo. I’m sorry but people are talking about trading Marvin now while Paul is being mentioned as the best pg in the NBA, hell you even mentioned Marvin as a trading piece but somehow you are trying to act like Paul is not a great player. When Marvin comes in second in MVP voting , hell if he even comes close to making an all star team please let me know because until he does even half of the things Paul has done he will always be remembered as the guy we took instead of Paul. It sucks but it is what it is.

Sekou Smith

June 3rd, 2009
4:35 pm

Charlie V can play the 3 and 4 and off the bench or in a starting role. He’s got a full offensive arsenal and he can score in a bunch of different ways. My bad Melvin, I didn’t know the Charlie V express had already left the station.

For all you people griping about paying Bibby too much, I don’t know about paying for Hinrich over the next few years. Take a look at his contract and tell me that’s money well spent.

I love Brandon Bass, too, but I think he’ll be tougher to get than Charlie V. Plus, his offensive skill set isn’t in the same stratosphere. And the Hawks need another scoring threat off that bench in the worst way.

Let’s see, Flip, Zaza, Childress, Charlie V. and Mo, plus whoever they draft, as a bench crew would look pretty good to me. But we’re just talking hypothetically here.

Tony from Stone Mountain

June 3rd, 2009
4:39 pm

“How can you let the Marvin Williams is not CP3 fiasco die. I mean look at the Hawks, we just got swept by a total of 200 hundred points in the Playoffs, gimme a fucin break.”

Did CP3 play in the 2nd. round?

rms

June 3rd, 2009
4:42 pm

The Hawks will draft a forward with the 19th pick or an 7-foot international player from Portugal!!

rms

June 3rd, 2009
4:43 pm

If CP3 played in the East he would have made it to the second round?

Sekou Smith

June 3rd, 2009
4:45 pm

And I agree 100 percent with what Mark Bradley said about the Hawks needing another star. I also realize how hard it is to pry one away in his prime, and the Hawks need a cat on his ascent or already in his prime, and not a fading star.

The reality is this, you have to look at the return on your investment with players. Any time you can sink rookie deal money into a guy his first few years and end up with a cornerstone like Josh Smith or Al Horford on the other side, it’s a victory. When you have to pay sticker price for a guy (like the Hawks did with Joe Johnson, after his rookie deal was done), you feel it a bit more in your wallet. And you expect bang for your buck when you’re shopping on the free agent and trade market. So you have to be careful how you spend.

There are going to be all sorts of financial constraints on teams in the immediate NBA future, so the team’s that spend wisest are likely to benefit the most (which is actually the way it always works). The Hawks haven’t gone crazy like some teams (New Orleans comes to mind with that foolish deal they gave Peja Stojakovic now coming back to haunt them). The passed on some of big money free agents of the past few cycles (Erick Dampier, Eddy Curry and Sam Dalembert come to mind), saving themselves from gigantic contracts that can cripple a franchise years after the fact.

It’s one of the reasons they’ll have some flexibility in the next two months to do some things to fortify the roster.

JuliusCesaer

June 3rd, 2009
5:07 pm

Listen Tony from Stn. Mtn.: Ill tell you why you can let the mistake of drafting Marvin Williams ahead of CP3 die. This is why. Ok. the hawks struggled like crazy against Miami; just barely beat them. And then got pounded by LaBron and the Cavs. But who is a bigger failure, the Hawks or the Cavs? This is why Labron refused to shake ANYBODYS hand of the Magic because LaBron feels the Cavs are a better team than the Magic and proved it in the regular season. But the regular season doesnt count when the playoffs start. The Cavs went 66-16 during the regular year, best record in the entire league, but still failed in the post-season. So do the Cavs need to start rebuilding from scratch? Look at the Hawks though, they were much improved over last year (10 games better) AND significantly better than in Woodys first season when the Hawks were a mere 13-69, absolutely horrible. Five years later under the general management of Billy Knight, the Hawks went from not making the playoffs, to making the playoffs with a losing record 37-45, to making the playoffs with a great record, 47-35, finishing in fourth place in the entire conference. Would you rather the Hawks were 13-69 or 47-35? Ill take a significant imrpovement. Of course, Billy Knight made a few drafting mistakes, but what GM doesnt make mistakes. Billy Knight always leaves a team in much better shape than when he first took over the helm. Before Knight, the Hawks were worse than 13-69. After Knight, they were 47-35; not bad, its a steady improvement. Hopefully the Hawks will win 50+ games next year, have a banner season and make it to the finals. But I would say the Hawks are closer to making the conference finals or the NBA finals than they are to mediocrity. Just a thought.

Nookah

June 3rd, 2009
5:35 pm

Ken Strick, you the man!!! If we are able to assemble your proposed team, trust me we’ll contend for the Eastern Conference finals next year. I love that team and I’m sold on Charlie V off the bench.

We have to resign Marvin, Zaza and Flip as a priority. McDyess would be an excellent pickup and with this squad we’d add a lot of depth and would be able to relieve JJ of some of his minutes and therefore have him much fresher for the playoffs.

Big Ray, I’d have no issues if we pick Hansbrough if he is the best player on the board when we pick. He is not a flashy player but I know we would get excellent value. He’s the type of player who’d bring the proverbial lunch pail to work every day and would help us significantly on the boards. What he lacks in athletic ability he would make up with technical ability. He knows how to position himself to be able to pull down those rebounds and with a healthy Horford would make a formidable rebounding force.

I hope Speedy can maintain his “health” so we can ship his contract and something else to move up or acquire a good FA. Although Speedy had a very bad time here, no one gets injured dileberately. He just had a bad time here. I wish him all the best and hope he can repay Atlanta by passing whatever medical he may have to undergo to be packaged.

Sekou, I hope you’ll be able to keep us updated with off-season activity of our squad once the dust settles.

Go Hawks!!!

Astro Joe

June 3rd, 2009
5:38 pm

Hinrich makes less than $9M/year for the next 3. I’d do it. I think that he eliminates the PG discussion for the next 3 years and I think he is the type of PG who can be effective for any coach running most offensive schemes. He’s playoff tested, a willling and tough defender and he plays hard all the time. And yes, he can bury the open jumper. Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t consider him an “elite” PG but I do think that he is by far the best “available” PG.

Now with that said, if we could trade for Jack (without having the nightmare of trying to pry a RFA from his team), then that would be worth pursuing since he would likely cost about half of Hinrich’s contract. But in general, I don’t like the idea of doing the whole offer sheet thing with other team’s RFAs.

Astro Joe

June 3rd, 2009
5:39 pm

doc

June 3rd, 2009
5:47 pm

melvin i agree totally different players with differnt posititons requiring different skills, only they seem to be hard nosed players is my comparison and smart, cagey and will be wise in the end. neither guy has the skills of the players they have to playa against, harpring is considered a g/f on yahoo; he will never be compared to the best in that category …. only he can play. i think hansborough would be classified as that as well.

MannyT

June 3rd, 2009
6:02 pm

I get that it is hard to find a good player exactly with the 19th pick, but there are good players EVERY year that are found outside of the lottery. Note this perspective when Bradley went with his I Need a Hero blog.
http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/06/01/why-the-atlanta-hawks-are-still-wishing-upon-a-star/comment-page-2/#comment-15334

I don’t expect to get a star at 19, but we can get a decent contributor. There are lots of PGs in this draft. Someone with a good name will be available. Truth be told, we need the dreaded best player available with that pick. Why, because if that player can give us 20 good minutes off the bench, he fills the major need of improving the bench. As long as Sund says that Horford is a center, the only starting gaps we have are replacing Bibby IF he leaves and replacing Marvin if we decide that we don’t want to match his offer.

If you want a contributor right now, look for a trade or a free agent. If you want a star, either get far enough under the cap to be the recipient of a magic beans trade (e.g. Gasol to Lakers, Camby to Clippers) or get some Astro Joe’s Organic Growth Juice and dunk our front court starters in it all summer with the hope that it is well absorbed by November.

BWAF

MannyT

June 3rd, 2009
6:09 pm

doc, I’m with you. Psycho T has just enough game and more than enough motor to stick around as a more effective version of a Josh Childress. You can run a specific play or two for him, but you don’t have to do it. He will have almost Mario like effort, but for a forward that can knock down the 12 footer at least as well as Al Horford.

As much as I hate to day it, he would be a fine fit to play in Cleveland. You can shine if you can make own offense, but you don’t need to as long as LeBron is getting you open looks.

BWAF

A Tribe Called Quest

June 3rd, 2009
7:16 pm

All those people who are mad at LeBron for walking out on the media after game 6 obviously have not seen this guy’s antics over the last 5 years.

I recall in one of the first games in 06-07, we beat the Cavs on the road behind Joe and Tyronn Lue’s clutchness, and with 10 seconds left in overtime, he walked out on his team (this is on youtube). When the Cavs lost their 1st home game this year, I believe he walked out on everyone. Immature player who only can make layups and uncontested shots.

Samuel

June 3rd, 2009
7:19 pm

To me Hansbrough looks like a player who could turn out to be a Najera at best and at worst not crack the rotation at all. I could be wrong.

Ray, considering our needs, i’d take Lawson over Ellington. When Speedy moves on as Cuz says he will, that will leave us with only two PG’s and one is a UFA.

I’m not sure how Lawson did in the “drills” but in the “Big Dance” he was blowing by everybody and was the undisputed leader of a National Championship Team.

I would actually like Charlie V as a starter at the 5. I know he’s not 7 feet he’s 6′11″ but he seems to play pretty good defense. He can stretch the defense and allow Al and Josh to work on the blocks on offense.

I still would rather have “Sheed” though.

RealSquawk

June 3rd, 2009
7:20 pm

Sekou,

I think you said the Hawks are probably going to draft a point guard? If so that means Acie Law is done here, what is it mutual or did Acie’s side force the issue?

And yes that hypothetical bench you were talking about Chill, Flip, Charlie V, Mo, and Zaza, yeah that’s deadly.

So are we giving up our rights to Anderson?

And I was just thinking about how Mike Woodson probably did not want Salim. I just think he has a natural aversion to point guards running his team. When it should be their team.

Sautee

June 3rd, 2009
7:38 pm

Mike,

about this:

June 3rd, 2009
9:23 am

“The Acie situation is a real problem. He has shown flashes when he’s had a chance to play, but that hasn’t been often and he has gotten hurt. If you resign Bibby and keep Acie, when would a rookie PG play? On the other hand, Acie hasn’t been healthy enough to be a reliable backup.”

Mike, do you think that Bibby hasn’t been healthy enough? Did you know that Bibby has missed more games from injury since Acie came into the league than Acie has? Yet no one seems to think that HE is injury prone.

If Acie had played in all of those dnp-cd’s over the last two years, I don’t think anyone would have that perception of him. Plus, We’d KNOW a lot more about keeping him or cutting him loose (either is ok with me, rather than paying him over $2M / yr for sitting) Any way you look it’s poor asset management to continue with him the way we have the last two years.

And I’d have to say that it’s been his low percentage on his jumper that’s made him an “unreliable backup” rather than injuries. I still would have bitten the bullet and let him learn and play through his shooting woes. Not play a LOT, but 15 minutes or so.

Can you EVER remember saying to yourself “We lost that game because of Acie Law?”

Me either, but you’d THINK that was OFTEN the case the way Woody failed to use him. I won’t be surprised if he flourishes somewhere else. But I’d LOVE to see what he could do here with regular time and a defined role.

Sautee

June 3rd, 2009
8:00 pm

Samuel,

I’ll have to say that I’m baffled that you’d choose Sheed over Charlie V.

08-09 Sheed $13.7M 12.0 points 7.4 rebounds and he will be 35 in September

08-09 Charlie V $3.4M ($4.6 next year) 16.2 points 6.7 rebounds and he will be 25 in August.

And hasn’t Sheed declared he needed $8M to sign?

To ME, it’s a no-brainer. Your cuz is right on the money.

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
8:07 pm

Sekou, I support your (coolhand)Luke Ridnour Theory. People seem to forget he helped leasd that team to 50 wins. He is a great ball handler capable of getting anywhere he wants. Like ray said, the main thing that’s been holding him back is his injuries the past 2-3 seasons. He plays hard and if hem Richard Jefferson, and Michael Redd can all stay healthy, we better watch out.

“Question: Which would you take – Lawson or Ellington? I say Lawson for now…I’ll explain later.”

Ray, I too would like to hear your explanation for that one. Personally, I know we NEED a PG, BUT If Ellington or Henderson is on the board(BTW did you know they are best friends/HS teammates…..youtube it…..nastyy hoops footage lol) I would defenetly take Ellington.

I’m sure you all know the rap on Lawson by now. Smallest guard in the draft. Out of all of the 5′11-6′0 guards(Mills, Flynn,Lawson, Tyrese Rice) he has the smallest wingspan(short arms). They also question his ability to finish in the paint on the NBA level. They also speak of his poor shot-mechanics(which anyone can see by just watching him play)

I’m sure Lawson has heard all of this junk before. The most important thing though, is that he has always come through when needed and always proved his doubters wrong. I’m not THAT big of a TY Lawson fan, but I certainly wouldn’t bet my money against him.

With all that being said, I’m still going with Ellington lol. Thats no knock against Lawson but Wayne is one of the strongest two-guards at the combine, not to mention one of the most athletic. He also has that sweet stroke(and you KNOW ya boi JJ can get the man open looks). He also said in an interview that he loves to be a playmaker and has played some PG. Honestly, his ballhandling is suspect to me, but he is a good passer.

He beats out his buddy Henderson in pretty much every category(as far as the combine measurements/workouts are concerned), but why is it then that Henderson elevates so high and Ellington doesn’t unless he’s working Off the ball(Lobs Etc..) Well, I call it the J-Smoove-LeBron theory. Henderson is just more Coordinated attacking the basket with a basketball and has better balance with the ball in his hands than Ellington. The same thing applies when you’re talking about LeBron and J-Smoove. CLEARLY J-Smoove jumps higher, runs faster and is more athletic (I think Josh is 3-0 now against LeBron for head-to-head jumpballs) but LBJ is just supremely cvoordinated and balanced(which is really rare for a big guy at such a young age) But LeBron used to be a lot smaller, whereas Josh has pretty much always been at least 6′5 since like middle school(slow big-man growth/coordination…..well a little faster than that of a big man)

Anyhoo….Yeah, it’s a tough call, but i’d go with Ellington…Unless Patrick Mills is on the board, at which point, if i’m the GM, i’ve gotta ask David Stern for more time to make my decision lol.

O'brien

June 3rd, 2009
8:08 pm

Samuel, Villanueva’s defense is very inconsistent, so I wouldnt play him at the 5. Like Sekou said, he can play the 3 or 4 effectively though.

Here’s an idea (somebody else mentioned it on an earlier blog). Milwaukee will probably let either Sessions or Villanueva go (both are restricted), so the Hawks should be able to get one of them. Villanueva or Sessions would each cost the midlevel exception, but I would be okay with Sessions as our starter for the next 5 years (let Bibby go). Sessions needs to work on his 3 point shooting, but he defends and penetrates, and would get JJ and our bigs some easy looks. I would sign Sessions and resign Flip, with Acie as the 3rd guard.

If Milwaukee matches Villanueva, then we offer Sessions.

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
8:12 pm

A Tribe Called Quest, When you guys havin’ another reunuion tour? You better pass through tha ATL lol. Can you hook a brotha up with front row seats?

Heehehehe…..

Sautee

June 3rd, 2009
8:20 pm

Ariose,

I like Ellington too. Not sure if he’d be the best pick at 19, but he reminds me a LOT of Allan Houston. Smoooooth and can drive well enough that you can’t just play his jumper. On a less deep and talented team he would easily have averaged over 20.

But if we drafted him, it might make signing Flip moot. Of course, some contender might have noticed Flip’s season and make him an offer that would make OUR signing him moot, anyway.

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
8:22 pm

RealSquawk, Acie isn’t done necessarily. If portland or Houston choose to pony up and pay Flip/Bibby tons of dough, we could end up with Acie starting and a Rookie guard as a backup.

I’m not opposed to that though, Acie defends and when given the oppourtunity can penetrate and pushes the tempo very well. Compared to Mike Conley, he’s certainly not a bust. He was even hitting threes on the regular earlier in the season before the WAFFLE man banished him to the bench for the remainder of the season.

If we pick up a guad in the draft, It just means we’re prepared to weather whatever freak trnactions(Chills to greece) may occour with our PG situation. Phil Jackson is using the Fisher/Brown/Farmar PG combination very well during this postseason……granted, Woodsy’s no Phil, but it can be done.

Oh yeah, Woody will probably never agree to this but we defenetly NEED to get an offensive coordinator, PRONTO…cause’ it’s apparent that the wood man has no clue lol.

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
8:23 pm

Sautee, Yup…

Blast

June 3rd, 2009
8:53 pm

All these trades and draft stuff interesting and all, but Sekou can’t even get into the Hawks workout gym. Means no one knows what Sund/Woody really thinking. Meaning everything on this blog is just pure speculation. Guess that’s what Hawks off season is all about. Lots of fun, though.

Charlie V or Sheed? Come on! No contest! Charlie all the way! Rasheed is too expensive for what he brings. I don’t think he’s passionate about playing basketball anymore. Imagine Rasheed and Josh in the same locker room. Can we talk combustible? We are trying to get Josh to cool down, man! Thought Hawks were going for character guys. And Charlie can plain out score.

darrell starks

June 3rd, 2009
8:54 pm

Lets say we bring back every body except bibby can we win with this team and the 19pick?
STARTER ACIE, JOE, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD,
BENCH FLIP, MOE, CHILL, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE SOLO, TY LAW.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 3rd, 2009
8:59 pm

The hawks bench might be better than the starting five.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

A Tribe Called Quest

June 3rd, 2009
9:06 pm

WTF is up with Sund’s comments? The guy has no idea what he is talking about

1) He said you don’t trade for [superstars]–you draft them. Um, the Heat traded for SHAQ and won a title a year later. You are a moron

2) He has no goals for this team. Making the playoffs with a winning record? Then he has the nerve to say he wouldn’t have minded if we made the playoffs with a losing record

3) His biggest accomplishment was being the GM of the Mavs. Can anyone here name 1 player on those Mavs team he was the GM of?

4) Can we please get a real GM who will take this team to a Finals, not this idiot who doesn’t want to win and will just resign and retain all our “young, athletic” players?

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
9:11 pm

Also, we should sign Geral Green. He is an ufrestricted free agen. We can sign him for right around the leauge minimum. It’s obvious his career is potentially on it’s last legs. He’s low risk and he’;s a 6′8 SG/SF who can jump out of the gym. He is an average shooter, but Mark Price can help him out with that. His work ehtic has come into question at times during his career, but it’s said that he turned things around in Dallas.

The way I see it, the More JJ insurance policies the better lol. Besides, guys like him and Ellington add mor playmakers from the SG/SF position which shou;d eventually take some of that burden off of JJ.

Green has been a guy who has reluied heavily on his athleticism his whole career. A guy like Woody would probably do Gerald some good. Also, I mean he has more potential/upside than we’ve had sitting at the end of our bench in a long time, I think wee sohuld defenetly sign him.

SEKOU, What do you think about us getting Lester Hudson or Tyrese Rice(Boston College) in the second round possibly?

Hudson Info/stats:

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Lester-Hudson-5065/

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
9:16 pm

Al horford woukld LOVE for Villanueva to come and play here lol. They both are from the Dominican Republic and play on their national team.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 3rd, 2009
9:17 pm

Samuel, Bibby’s injury was the only real injury he’s ever had. He is perfectly healthy now.

I can’t stand people who look at draftees and claim what player they’ll be just because they look like that player. That’s like saying Derrick Rose would be the next Deron Williams because they look alike. Stop looking at their faces and start looking at how they play the game

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
9:23 pm

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
9:26 pm

I was suprised that Eric Devendorf wasn’t on that PG list(BTW he graduated from Syracuse this year) considering the fact that he played PG every year he was at oak Hill Academy.

Stats:

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Eric-Devendorf-291/

Second round Anyone? Maan there is going to be a lot of talent left out of this draft. Hopefully, Sund will pick up the scraps after the draft is over.

Samuel

June 3rd, 2009
10:00 pm

Tribe,

I have no idea what you are talking about.
I hear all the Sheed bashing. Some of yall were saying the same thing about Shaq a few months ago. I just takes the right situation. Sheed is ready to get out of Detroit but I believe he has more ball in him.

Charlie V guarding the 3. I’ll have to see that.

doc

June 3rd, 2009
10:49 pm

samuel i dont think nor expect tyler to crack any top five but expect him to be the type of missing piece folks look for to have on the bench or as a spot starter. sometimes it is not about skill but desire, you know what eddie curry or marcus williams lack. so far i dont see anything in lawson’s game that gets him minutes in woody’s “system”. he has said he wants the bigger guys, defenders and guys that can knock down shots when left open, not slashers and big assist guys. not saying i dislike him but is he about the same as the kid who came out and hasnt made it yet for memphis?

O'brien

June 3rd, 2009
10:53 pm

Samuel, I am big fan of Sheed, because he can post up, he can hit the 3, and he is a better defensive presence than Zaza. Plus I like his attitude and fiestiness (as long he keeps it in check). However, he is 34, and he will cost more than Zaza ($8-$9 mil compared to the midlevel for Zaza). Plus Sheed still wants to be a starter, and I dont blame him. But I dont think he would start for the Hawks (unless you move Horford to the bench).

If Zaza can be resigned for $5 mil or so, and then we get Villanueva to backup the 4 (and 3 sometimes), that would be good. As far as guarding the 3, Marvin is our starting 3, so Charlie would come off the bench, which makes it a little easier for him playing against other bench players, and he would guard mostly 4’s. I hope we bring Chills back and he would guard the 3’s, with Mo Evans as our backup SG.

I agree with Sekou. If we can have a bench of Zaza, Charlie V, Chills, Mo Evans and Flip, thats a pretty good second team. Even if we have 4 out of those 5, I think that’s still a pretty good bench.

I hope Sund gets it right…

Hoops

June 3rd, 2009
11:00 pm

Manny T,

Think about this plan to improve the hawks before you laugh too loud. It might work.

1. Contact the Kings, Wizards, Timberwolves, & Warriors to see if any of these teams would trade their draft pick for Acie, Evans, and #19 pick. If one of these teams agree, then draft Curry. Let’s just say Curry makes $3,000,000 + or -. You have just saved $1,716,160. Now the Hawks 2009-10 committed salary is down to $39,149,037.
2. Contact Childress and tell him he will be given an opportunity to start. I believe you can sign him for 7M per. Now your salary is up to 46M.
3. Sign Devin Harris for 9M per maybe 10M. Now your salary is up to 56M.
4. Offer the Suns Josh Smith and Speedy for A. Stoudemire. That makes our salary 56.4M.
5. Resign Flip for 4M per and Zaza for 5M per. Now your salary is 65.4M.
6. Sign and trade Marvin for Charlie V. You probably save 1M here.
6. Now your salary is 3.6M less than this season. Use some of this and sign Brandon Bass.
Look @ this line up:
PG-Harris, Flip
SG-Childress, Curry
SF-JJ, Charlie V.
PF-A. Stoudemire, B. Bass
C- Horford, Zaza, Morris

This is a much improved team for less money!

The Truth

June 3rd, 2009
11:05 pm

Sekou

If you are campaigning for Charlie V in your article, than you are probably during the Hawks Organization more harm than good. Why; because if he is looking good to us (which is apparently the case) than he is probably looking even better to other competing teams. Since Sund hasn’t shown any aggressiveness in his actions (so far), then that means Charlie V may become the first round of FA falling to another team early in July. His qualifying offer of 4.6M will be a no-brainer for another team looking to add depth to its roster. The only way we get him is acting fast. Until Sund shows me those traits, I’m not going to get a “Hard-On” dreaming about this acquisition concept. I will also say that about other “great” pick-up ideas I’ve been reading from these bloggers.

Regarding draft picks, that’s easy. Create a list of 19 draftees’ that management and the coaching staff feels very passionate about. Rank them in order of preference. During the draft, as these players are selected by other teams before us, scratch them off. When it is the Hawks time to pick, we just select what’s left from the list with the highest preference. With the 19th pick, it is not rocket science. This is not a best available strategy; it is a default strategy from a controlling list.

Ariose

June 3rd, 2009
11:34 pm

Doc, You talkin’ about Darius Washington?

Melvin

June 3rd, 2009
11:35 pm

NBADRAFT.net has the following comparison for Earl Clark from Louisville – NBA Comparison: Marvin Williams/Boris Diaw.
Does that make him the logical choice if available at #19??

Regardless, if he’s there I say pick him. He remind me of Billy Owens. SF/PF that has the skills to play on the perimeter and body to bang in the post…

doc

June 3rd, 2009
11:55 pm

ariose, i am talking about mike conley.

Tom Glavine

June 4th, 2009
12:10 am

Marvin Williams-is-not-Chris-Paul!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Suckers.

RealSquawk

June 4th, 2009
12:23 am

Ariose,

I did not even think about that because from a General manager stand point that has to be like the worst option available, but from my stand point and Acie’s stand point and making the team better that is a great option. That pushes us closer to a running style and we get a bigger point guard who will drive to the basket.
And he has to be competitive because there is an eager rookie nipping at his heels.

Now onto Josh Smith and his playoff numbers.
did they have anything to do with him being the only healthy body?
JOe being doubled and tripled?
Teams not taking him seriously in the post (they doubled Al, but only swiped their hands at Josh)
Either way somebody had to step up and I am glad he did, but was it really as much as an improvement as we make it out to be.

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
12:27 am

Charlie V at center? He’s a combo forward who plays horrible post defense. No thanks. If we get him, he should be slotted as the backup PF/SF. There’s a reason that he (and Dirk and KG) never see minutes at center.

jhan

June 4th, 2009
12:28 am

Scratching the names off the list as they are drafted is the easy part. Creating the correct 19 player list is the key.

cp

June 4th, 2009
1:03 am

I see more people are coming around to Earl Clark. If he is there at 19 we should take him. Ariose I actually wanted to bring Gerald Green in last year but we always seem to pass over guys like that. I remember the year he came out that BK tried to get another pick to take him but wasn’t able too. I would like either Gerald Green or Jamario Moon. Both are athletic and can guard more than one position because of their length and jumping ability. I like Green a little more because he is a better shooter and younger. Plus I think he realizes it takes more than athleticism to get by. I would love to get the guard from the Hurricanes in the second round. His name slips my mind at this time but he won the college 3 point shooting contest. He has a great shooting stroke.

The Truth

June 4th, 2009
1:03 am

jhan

Good point; If I was Sund, I would take the “More Heads are Better Than One Approach” and select a team of “so-called experts” to draft a preliminary list first. Shake the list down to 19. Then the key becomes ranking the list. That would become the core of the arguments.

Ed

June 4th, 2009
1:27 am

First you can forget any thoughts about Jrue H. being available with the 19th pick. He has now become a solid lottery pick.
Second, I am so glad to hear you are off the Luke Ridnour bandwagon Sekou after so many years.
Lastly, I don’t like the Hansbrough pick at all especailly considering the dynamics of the Hawks situation.

KevinA

June 4th, 2009
2:28 am

How can we consider a draft pick unless it is to trade later. We all know Woody and his history of treating rookies. This is why getting Chills back and getting a vetern PG is so important. If by chance we do get Chils back the importance of resigning Evans and Flip goes away. Let these guys and the draft picks go to resigning our core players.

KevinA

June 4th, 2009
2:37 am

The blogs keep adding front court players. Woody dosen’t develope the ones he has. Morris and Sole are exellent examples who might be fine given the chance.
Bibbby is proven but slow and no defense. We need a veteren PG with better defensive skills. JJ is going to demand the ball and control the offense anyways. If the new veteren PG can get the ball to Marvin, Chills, Al and Josh where thay can score – problem solved. If JJ lets him.

MannyT

June 4th, 2009
3:21 am

Hoops, I’ll temporarily suspend my skepticism and say if Sund is that convincing, he is the most intersting man in the NBA. You are weaving through NBA cap rules like James Bond. I just don’t see Chills coming back here instead of cashing the Greek checks.

I doubt you need Bass and Charlie V if neither starts. The good news is you probably don’t have the cap space to sign both. Mid level exception is likely to be less than 6 mil. Flip’s deal has to come out of that money as well as any signings of players that are not coming from the draft.

While it seems incredibly hard to pull off, I’d be surprised if JJ was up for playing most of the season as a SF. That lineup looks like you believe JJ will be gone next summer to greener pastures.

Keep in mind our history of attracting free agents.

BWAF

Ed

June 4th, 2009
3:46 am

Here’s an analysis from the NBA Draft Combine. Notice Wayne Ellington’s vertical

You’ve got to respect Blake Griffin, James Harden, and Jordan Hill for participating while fellow lottery picks Ricky Rubio, Hasheem Thabeet, and Brandon Jennings did not. It’s disappointing that we don’t get a chance to see how this year’s best all stack up against each other, but we can analyze what we have.

People make a big deal about the fact that Griffin measured at 6’10” in shoes, but the things that will make Blake a nightmare at the next level are his speed and agility. His 10.95 in the lane agility test and 3.28 in the ¾ court sprint were right there with the likes of Jonny Flynn, a player considered to be one of the most athletic point guards in college basketball this past year. He also recorded 22 reps on the bench press, good for 2nd best at the combine. Not like it matters; Griffin could have put up Austin Daye – numbers and would still go #1.

No projected lottery player was more surprising at the combine than James Harden. Many scouting reports on Harden say that he’s not athletic, but his results say otherwise. First, he recorded a 37” vertical and reached the same maximum height (11’8.5”) as Blake Griffin. Second, he ran a 3.13 sprint, which was only one hundredth behind speedster Ty Lawson, and repped 17 on the bench press. It’s been reported that the Thunder are considering him at #3. With no more reservations about his athleticism, is this enough for Harden to leapfrog Rubio?

Hill was up and down at the combine. On one hand, his standing reach (9’0”), body fat (6%), and maximum height (11’11”) were impressive. His 3.3 sprint was actually faster than several wing players as well. On the other, he recorded the worst agility score at the combine and only repped 11 on the bench. With the way the game has evolved, most NBA PFs are stronger and more agile than Hill, so he has some work to do physically.

Point Guards

Don’t be fooled by that baby face; just because Stephen Curry looks like a 12-year-old, it doesn’t mean he has the body of one. Surprisingly, he reached ten reps in the bench (honestly, who thought he’d get past 3?) and had the same vertical as Mr. Griffin. While his speed and agility weren’t on par with other PGs, his IQ will help to make up for it at the next level.

Jeff Teague only has 4.5% body fat and repped 13 on the bench, both impressive numbers for the underclassmen. He also recorded a 36.5” vertical leap.

Two surprises with Ty Lawson: his vertical (36.5”) and the fact that five guys posted faster times in the sprint. Just the opposite, there were no surprises with Eric Maynor or Jonny Flynn. Flynn’s 40-inch vertical was best at the combine.

Toney Douglas was the fastest player at the combine (3.03 on the sprint) while Jack McClinton was most agile.

Wings

Considering what a physical specimen Gerald Henderson looks like, his 8 reps on the bench and 11.17 agility time can only be deemed disappointing. His 4.4% body fat (best in the combine) is impressive, though.

Demar Derozan is an elite jumper, not an elite athlete. His max vertical of 38.5” was good for 3rd best at the combine, but his bench press (5 reps), agility (11.88 – terrible for a wing), and sprint (3.31) left much to be desired.

Earl Clark’s measurements (6’10.25,” standing reach 9’1.25”) were excellent, but five reps on the bench press are weak.

One of the most impressive players at the combine was Xavier’s Derrick Brown. Brown was considered a potential lottery pick earlier this year, but his stock plummeted. While his 3.13 in the sprint, 20 reps on the bench, and maximum height of 11’11” won’t catapult him back into the lottery, those numbers are impressive enough to make some teams think.

Wayne Ellington was always known for his fluid game, but his measurements should eliminate any concerns about his size and athleticism. He is over 6’5” in shoes, has a vertical leap of 38 inches, and pumped 185 lbs 13 times.

Austin Daye and Greivis Vasquez had the worst performances of the combine by far. Neither player exhibited the speed, strength, or jumping ability necessary to make an impact at the next level.

Bigs

Dejuan Blair had only 12% body fat, which was the same as Wake’s James Johnson. Looking at them, you’d never guess they’d have equal body fat. Blair’s 18 bench reps and decent agility numbers coupled with his incredible wingspan make him an intriguing prospect.

A big man that helped himself a lot is Luke Harangody. He turned out to be the strongest player at the combine (23 reps) while posting solid numbers in the sprint and agility tests

Ed

June 4th, 2009
3:49 am

The analysis came from By Mike DeStefano

Clyde

June 4th, 2009
7:12 am

One thing I don’t like about Charlie V is he’s injury prone. I think Wilcox would fit better.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
7:29 am

Samuel,

Agreed on Lawson. We need to shore up the pg situation more than most things. Lawson is considered undersized, but he has the weight and the speed. End to end, with the ball in his hands, he is considered the quickest on the court in college. Don’t know what Woody or Sund thinks of him.

Ariose,

The reason I choose Lawson over Ellington (for the moment) is our need to deal with the pg situation. Now, if we bring in a free agent veteran pg, I can sorta change my mind. We only have two pgs under contract. One is Law, who we don’t know if we’re going to trade or keep, and he’s not a known quantity. The second is none other than Speedy, who Sekou says will be moving. Bibby and Flip are UFAs, if I remember correctly.

Depends on what we do with the pg situation. Problem is, the draft happens before free agency does. I like Ellington, but does he get minutes behind JJ? Now, if we’re not sure about JJ sticking around, then we definitely want to look at getting a replacement and grooming him NOW. So many variables.

Sekou Smith

June 4th, 2009
7:32 am

Analysis of combine numbers is fine Ed, but I put much more stock in analysis of a guy’s game. Wayne Ellington, by the way, is a guy that I’ve heard good things about. And I wasn’t particularly enthralled by him during the season. But a couple NBA executives who were at the Final Four told me that Ellington was a lot better than even they thought. A player with a sweet shooting stroke like that would be an interesting fit anywhere late in the first round.

I’m going to go back and watch Earl Clark before I make any comments about him. T. Williams was always the cat that stood out to me when Louisville was on. I know Clark has plenty to work with but he never seemed to dominate the floor.

And can the NBA Finals start already. We get a game every day for 40 days and then we get a week of chatter about LeBron not shaking hands (much ado about nothing, if you ask me) and Kobe finally taking his place among the top 10 players of all time (some talking head yesterday insisted that he passes Wilt on the all-time greats list if he guides the Lakers to the title … the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard in the last 15 years). Bring on the game’s man!!!!!

Verbal Kent

June 4th, 2009
8:51 am

I agree with what Melvin said… If Brandon Jennings somehow fell to us and we selected him it would be a God Send! the kid has loads of potential and he’s still only about 19 years old. He’s going to be a great NBA point guard regardless of the minutes he played over in Italy… his game has “Swagg” and flair and he’s ultra-competitive. I will continue to hope and pray until draft night… LOL.. I’d be happy with either J. Flynn or Ty Lawson to though.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
9:52 am

Sekou,

I agree with you on Terrence Williams. I think he’s a slighty smaller verison Iggy from 76ers. We could defintely use another explosive person from the wing. I wouldn’t see on Earl Clark either. He may be a cheaper version of Charlie V…

Verbral Kent,
If he slips out of the top ten, I hope we could swing a deal to move up to snatch him…

G-Man

June 4th, 2009
10:23 am

DOES ANYONE HAVE ESPN INSIDER? IF SO, WHO DOES CHAD FORD HAVE US GETTING AT 19?

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
11:32 am

No offense to anybody that likes Earl Clark, but I’m just not seeing it. Sure, the guy has plenty of potential. We hear that word so much. But he looks like a cross between Marvin and Solo. He’s caught between the 3 and 4, while lacking the discipline or consistency to commit to either spot. He could turn into a Rashard Lewis type of player, but whatever team he goes to would need to bring him along behind somebody.

That, and he’s weak. We already have Solo. We already have Marvin (a bit shorter, but the same wingspan), who is a proven commodity. I don’t see how Clark helps, now or in the future. But that’s just my opinion. I could be wrong.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
11:33 am

Astro Joe,

Co-sign on Hinrich or Jack. The former is a good fit. The latter is as well, and comes cheaper.

And I don’t like going after other teams’ RFAs either.

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
11:38 am

Blair measured at 6′5.25 without shoes and just 6′6.5 with. He has long arms, but his vertical was very underwhelming. Don’t look now, but Shelden had a better vertical than him (both no-step and max) and a better reach.

Mullens look like an athletic freak for someone his size. Of course, athleticism isn’t the knock on Mullens, so that doesn’t allay the big fears about him. Toney Douglas also put up great numbers…but again, his athleticism was never the concern.

Najeh Davenpoop

June 4th, 2009
12:18 pm

Couple of things:

Combines are useless in any sport. Watch game tape and you can tell everything a player can do. Straight up.

Hansbrough can be a good player, but if Blair is available you’d have to be an idiot to take Hansbrough over him.

I know it’s tempting to compare Psycho T to other white players, but honestly he reminds me of Udonis Haslem more than anyone else. I think that’s who nbadraft.net compares him to.

I don’t entirely buy that Marvin-over-CP3 is still relevant. Yeah, it was a terrible pick, but that pick epitomizes Billy’s draft formula, and Billy is gone.

Finally, how about those Braves! Yeah, Wren gave up a lot, but McLouth has impressed me every time I’ve seen him play, and he’s signed for another four years. I don’t mind letting go of Glavine either — that team has clung to its long-gone division titles streak for too long. Hopefully this will begin a new age of winning for them.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
12:30 pm

niremetal, you say Shelden I say Maxiell. But alas, likely a moot point since dude seems to be going in the top 15 (if not a lottery pick).

Saying that a good player can be chosen at #19 is like saying a good player can be chosen at #30. It’s not about can it happen, it’s about the odds of actually making it happen. There will always be examples of guys that slipped through the cracks in every sport. But I wouldn’t bet against the field when the most recent history says Hickson, Douby and Crittenton falls to teams picking #19. Finding a guy who can give us 12-15 minutes/game in his rookie season would be HUGE.

And for the upteenth time, please, if Woody gave every 1st round pick steady playing time over his tenure as head coach (with one exception), can you reasonably conclude that Woody doesn’t like to play 1st round picks? And even in that one exception, Acie’s playing time dried up at the exact time that Bibby arrived AND his boss was trying to fire him. And at the time, Acie was shooting less than 40% from the field. Come on people, a little context please?

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
12:33 pm

Najeh, I applaud EVERYTHING that Wren did yesterday. Glavine was essentially a “just in case of emergency” survival kit. We didn’t need it so we got rid of it. I’d much rather have a GM who leans toward “it’s just business” than one who allows feel good stories to factor into decision-making. The Braves are close, not there yet, but they are real close to being back.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
12:47 pm

LOL @ Astro Joe.

Maybe Woody only gave his 1st round picks playing time because his boss told him to. Ok, ok, I’ll quit, I’m just stirring up $hit because I’m bored… ;)

Niremetal,

I think Blair will turn out to be more effective than Sheldon. We’ll see. Everything that people like about Mullens is why we won’t get him at 19. He’s a project and has major bust potential, but he’s got potential in the other direction as well.

He would benefit from a team that has time to bring him along. Kind of like Spencer Hawes.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
1:09 pm

Ray, that what bosses do sometimes. Honestly, I think they received the time because they were viable options to help the team win. But that speaks more to the veterans on those teams than it does to the rookies. Mario Chalmers got a slew of time not because Spoelstra was developing him but because they alternative was Chris Quinn. If the #19 pick gets a lot of playing time for our team, that is a really, really, really, really bad sign of our team’s season (or disasterous off-season moves by the GM). We earned the opportunity to draft in the bottom half by winning in the top half. The result of that success is not likely going to be a guy who plays 20 minutes a game in his rookie season.

Reggie

June 4th, 2009
1:33 pm

DOES ANYONE HAVE ESPN INSIDER? IF SO, WHO DOES CHAD FORD HAVE US GETTING AT 19?

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
1:46 pm

Reggie, Jeff Teague, is who Ford currently projects the Hawks drafting.

Analysis: The Hawks have blown it repeatedly when they’ve needed a point guard in the draft. They passed on Chris Paul to draft Marvin Williams and passed on Rajon Rondo to draft Shelden Williams.

Then, two years ago, when they finally got around to picking a point guard, they took Acie Law ahead of Rodney Stuckey.

The choice here likely will come down to Teague and Ty Lawson. Lawson has the experience and leadership credentials, but Teague has the sizzle and upside.

That’s Ford’s view. In my view, this team needs far more experience and leadership and not sizzle and upside.

But like I said a few days ago, if Sund does want a PG, he needs to trade up before Philly. I’d try to go after Phoenix’s pick. Or have Phoenix draft for us and then do a post-draft S&T that gives them Childress for that PG chosen at #14 and Jared Dudley.

#21=Top50,1stBallot

June 4th, 2009
2:29 pm

Josh

June 4th, 2009
2:42 pm

If the hawks draft CP3 they dont finish bad enough to get Al Horford the next season so a Marvin/Horford is pretty close to CP3 anyway. let it go.

JerryWest

June 4th, 2009
2:49 pm

How many championships did Bobby Sura cost us?

Sura+Lue went nuts at the end of a meaningless season that netted us Childress instead of Howard.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
2:54 pm

Astro,

There are quality guys that are pick outside the draft lottery each year that contributes valuable mins and production to their teams (and some in their rookie season). Micheal Redd, JaVale McGee, Agent 0, Josh Smith, Diaw and Manu comes to mind but I can’t give you more examples right now b/c I’m on my work computer (security blocks). My point is, if a GM does his do diligence then he could find a diamond in the rough. So I’m expect our GM to pick a player at #19 that can contribute to the team success next year and beyond…

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
3:00 pm

Jerry,

Correction, it was Bobby Sura and Jason Terry that played well at the end of season you are referring to. I thought they were going to bring both players back the following season but BK had other plans. Besides, it was the commissioner fault that we didn’t get the hometown hook that season like Cleveland did in the previous draft…

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
3:29 pm

Melvin, like I said. I know that there are always guys who can provide a contribution. But the odds don’t favor it at #19. I don’t think that all of those GMs who passed on Arenas, Ginobli, Redd, etc. didn’t do their “due diligence”. It’s simply an imperfect science, no matter how much we want it to be “easy” to identify the perfect player at #19, it rarely, rarely happens. Smith, as an example, was drafted late by a team that went on to win 13 games. I could have gotten playing time on a 13-win squad. I think Arenas started on a crappy Warriors squad (I could be wrong). That’s why I made it a point to say that playing time for a guy drafted at #19 is usually related to the team’s success in that rookie season. If we’re on our way to another 45+ win season, it may be really challenging for #19 to find playing time in his rookie campaign.

cp

June 4th, 2009
3:48 pm

I really don’t see much of Marvin or Solo in Earl Clark. He can create his own shot, something Marvin still needs to work on.. He is a pretty good ball handler and passer. His coach thinks he can end up being another Lamar Odom. If he is there at 19 I just think he is way too talented to pass up. He was projected as a top 10 pick not too long ago. Plus he could come in for either Josh or Marvin instead of having Mo come in trying to play sf . Plus he is a decent shot blocker for the position he plays. Well the more I think about it the more he sounds like a BK type of player so if he is there we will probably pass.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
4:03 pm

Astro,

Although we won 47 games last season, keep in mind that 4 of our top 8 guys are FA’s and there no gaurantees that they will be resign. On top of that, we may have limited salary cap space (considering that we make qualifying offers to Chills and Marvin). So that place even more emphasis on the draft because not only are we going to need bodies but we may need some of those bodies to contribute immediately. In closing, I will not give Sund or any of the Hawks brass a pass on the draft because it’s not an exact science (by the way, what is?). I expect them to draft guys that are able to compete from day 1. That’s why they make the big bucks. If he can’t field a competitive team (preferably championship level) next season then get him out of here. I will not lower my expectations b/c the job is difficult.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
4:13 pm

Astro Joe,

I pretty much agree with everything you said in your 1:09 and 1:46 posts. The possibility exists that we get somebody at #19 who contributes significanlty, right away. But as you say, it’s not likely unless something went wrong. I also agree on the idea of moving up in the draft if we want to get a pg. I’m guessing we do if Sund is not too high on Acie and/or Woody isn’t high on him and Sund agrees to look elsewhere for a young protege to play behind Bibby.

CP,

Earl Clark has some abilities. He’s built like Solo was when he came in the league (6′10″ 225 or so). True, he can create his own shot, but he doesn’t do so consistently. He’s got a lot of upside/potential both offensively and defensively. His issues are consistency and discipline. As you say, definitely a guy who would fit Billy’s mold. Like I said, maybe he turns into a Rashard Lewis type (or something more potent). I don’t know. He’s definitely talented, I’m just thinking about fit.

That’s all well and good if you want to wait possibly another 3-4 years for a guy that might be better than Marvin. I think we need a pg more, but I’m not the one making the decisions. Who knows what Sund will do. I’d like to see him move up in the draft either way.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
4:16 pm

CP
Agree with you about Clark.

Big Ray,
My response to you in reference to Earl Clark got caught in the Matrix. Like CP said, Clark has alot talent/skills along with the potential that you referred to you. He has the shooting touch of Marvin and the ball handling of Diaw. Hence why I believe the nbadraft.net site use those comparisons.

I think he’s more Billy Owens than Lamar. I think Lamar is alot more crafty when it comes to creating his own shots than Earl but he may develop that in the future. However, I would definitely take him over Tyler Hansborough. I think it’s easier to find a high energy guy that hustles, rebounds and defend then it is to find a guy with alot offensive skills sets that can play multiply positions on the floor.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
4:18 pm

Melvin,

Woody said it best: “You don’t want to go in the other direction…”

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
4:28 pm

Big Ray,

Consider the source. Was the Waffle House man pointing in both directions when he said that…(LOL)
Imagine the cartoon character (his name slips my mind at the moment) saying “which way did he go, which way did he go”…

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
4:38 pm

Melvin, if we lose those FAs (specifically Bibby, Marvin, Flip, Zaza & Childress), Sund better not plan on replacing any of those guys with #19. He better use the salary cap relief on some proven vets. Again, if #19 is getting 15+ minutes a game next season, we’re a “bubble” team (at best).

If we’re drafting a PG, I WANT MAYNOR. And he won’t be sitting there at #19.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
4:46 pm

Melvin,

I’m not arguing Clark’s talent and versatility. I question his fit based on what we want to do. Since I can only guess what we’re looking for in the draft, anything I say is nothing but speculation and perhaps far-reaching conjecture. If the front office wants a pg or a player that helps out in the post (primarily on defense, rebounds), then Clark is not the guy that fits.

At the same time, Sund has said that he leans toward picking the best talent available when picking 19th. It’s the usual juggling act. As guys come off the board, our personal draft board will change.

Here’s how I can see a guy like Clark getting drafted by us:

Let’s say our needs-based targets are a PG and a PF/C. Imagine there are 9 point guards in the draft, but only 5 of them are guys we’d take without hesitation. At the same time, there are only 3 PF/C types that we’d take without hesitation. When our pick comes up, there are two good SGs available, 4 point guards that are ok (but we weren’t targeting especially), two talented swing forwards (one of them is Clark), and one PF/C type that is solid, but has very little upside.

At this point, the GM probably has to decide whether or not what’s left on the board that matches his “needs” is worth the pick. If not, he’s now in “drafting the best available talent” mode. Now he’s looking at who has the most overall talent, along with which he can get the most use from.

Some guys make great trade assets (usually based on what you know another team wants, but can’t get for whatever reason, and they have something YOU want), and therefore you pick them for that purpose. But, you want a guy who can contribute if a trade never materializes. That’s where things get tricky.

What if Wayne Ellington is the best talent left on the board, next to Earl Clark? Who is liable to get more minutes or contribute more? Ellington? Perhaps not, if JJ remains here. Clark? How’s he going to get minutes behind Marvin (if he’s re-signed) and Josh Smith? Either player would have to prove that he’s a talent of at least “sixth man” level. But your best sixth man is usually a veteran…

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
4:49 pm

Astro,

But we won’t know if we are losing any of our FA’s until after the draft. So we better make the most out of the draft as possible. Like you, I wouldn’t mind seeing us move up (especially if we have a player on our target) or acquire more draft picks. I think Detroit/New Orleans/Phoenix and some other teams are trying to dump their picks.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
5:11 pm

Have I mentioned lately how much I like Kirk Hinrich?

Lots has been made about the speed of this year’s point guards, with many teams debating whether Darren Collison, Patrick Mills or Ty Lawson would take the prize in the three-quarter-court sprint. None of them did.

Toney Douglas had the fastest time at 3.03 seconds. Collison and Mills were tied for second at 3.1, Lawson was fourth at 3.12, Beaubois was fifth at 3.15, Evans was sixth at 3.17, Jeff Teague was seventh at 3.18, Eric Maynor was ninth at 3.19 and Jrue Holiday was 10th at 3.21. Surprisingly, Flynn didn’t make the top 10.

How do those numbers rate historically? Douglas had the sixth-best time in combine history. The most successful NBA player to beat him is Nate Robinson at 2.96 seconds. The 3.1 score of Collison and Mills puts them on par with Kirk Hinrich, Jay Williams and Russell Westbrook.

Raise your hand if you thought that Hinrich was as fast coming out of college as Patty Mills?

Ken Strickland

June 4th, 2009
5:17 pm

SAUTEE-you’re assessment of ALaw and his situation compared to Bibby’s was simply priceless and dead on point. It’s amazing how many excuses have come out of the Hawk camp about Acie being injury prone or not being ready. Yet, not one positive word has come out concerning his excellent speed, quickness, penetrating ability, DEF or confidence.

At the beginning of his rookie season, he consistently got extended mins and went up against some of the NBA’s top PG’s and more than held his own, especially on DEF. Not only was that not made an issue by our coaching staff, it wasn’t used as an example of what he can accomplish if he’s mentored, encouraged and consistently given extended mins. As soon as TLue returned, Acie became an after thought and buried at the end of the bench, then the excuses started. The same thing happened at the start of this season when his outstanding training camp went unrewarded and all but ignored by our coaching staff.

However, Bibby’s numerous shortcomings, like his lack of quickness, speed, penetratiing ability and DEF, along with his injuries, goes unmentioned and/or unaddressed by our coaching staff because of his 3pt shooting and experience. If Bibby isn’t resigned, and we draft a PG, I can’t see Woodson allowing the rookie or Acie a realistic chance to effectively run the team because it would lessen his chances of forcing Sund to sign another vet PG, which was basically how the trade for Bibby came about.

I don’t disagree with Sekou’s choice of LRidnour as a PG choice, but KHinrick basically gives you everytning LRidnour does and he’s a better shooter, with range. With Woodson’s emphasis on jumpshooting and having a jumpshooting PG, Heinrick would be a better fit for his limited jumpshooting dependent OFF. I like Wilcox, but both Charlie V and AMcDyess gives you more OFF versatility, since both are very good outside shooters that can post up effectively. Someone mentioned Charlie V’s lack of DEF. Well, he has height, size, can rebound, postup, shoot with range and play multiple positions. That type of versatility makes his lack of DEF much less of an issue than MBibby’s limitations and lack of DEF, especially since he’d be coming off the bench.

AGAIN;
PG-KHeinrick
SS-JJohnson
SF-MWilliams
PF-JSmith
C-AHorford

BENCH
PG—-ALaw
SF/SG-JChildress
SG/PG-RMurray
C/PF–Charlie V & AMcDyess
C—–ZPachulia and/or SJones
SG/SF-MEvans

This roster would give us better size, height, depth, versatility, inside/outside scoring & DEF, as well as OFF/DEF rebounding. And more importantly, the new additions wouldn’t go against the old school mentality of HC MWoodson.

ILL-logical

June 4th, 2009
5:34 pm

I am going to out a limb here and predict that the winner of tonights game will only have to win 3 more games to claim the championship.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
5:41 pm

Melvin,

Just ‘cuz Woody says it don’t make it not true. Heh heh heh. How’s that for a double negative? Woody says a lot of obvious things. I think that was just the best one.

Astro Joe,

On the subject of speed, those are some stats I followed, too. A couple things stand out as variables, though. One, it’s like running a 40 yard dash in the NFL combine. A guy disappoints at the combine, then comes back during a Pro Day or other workout event and shaves 3 tenths of a second off his .40 time. So maybe he was having a bad day at the combine.

Another point to consider is how fast a guy PLAYS. When you’re running a drill, do you have the ball in your hands? Are you dodging defenders and looking to score or make a play while you’re hauling booty up the floor?

Some guys will have the edge on a drill. Other guys will PLAY faster. And with that speed must come a level of control. That’s what I think sets guys like Lawson and Flynn apart from some other guys. Lawson is so very good at not turning the ball over. Flynn a little less so, but still at the top of the heap (didn’t check all the stats).

I like Eric Maynor, too, by the way. Kid can play. And, he’s not a bad size at all.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
5:44 pm

Didn’t know Hinrich had equal speed to Patty Mills, but I knew he was quick. I remember when Chicago first drafted him, and he was consistently outrunning his slower teammates up and down the court. It was a bit comical, because he had to keep waiting for them to catch up and get ready to receive a pass.

I wouldn’t mind seeing him here at all. I understand the money concerns, and agree that Jarrett Jack is a good alternative that is cheaper.

Big Ray

June 4th, 2009
6:10 pm

Astro Joe,

Now are we talking about adding Hinrich along with Bibby, or in case he’s not retained? Just curious.

Ken Strickland,

Very well stated. I think however, that we are simply at a crossroads with Acie Law. Why he did or didn’t play, why he did or didn’t produce, when he did or didn’t produce is all moot. He’s still an unknown quantity, and Sekou lends credence to that idea by suggesting there is a split in perspective on him in Hawksville. Of course, he could just be talking about US, contentious scurvy knaves that we be (okay, doubt that any of us have the scurvy, but you get my drift).

But something tells me he’s talking about those who have real input and/or are part of the decision-making segment.

Law has just completed his second year. He’s an unknown enough quantity that teams will still see potential in him. He’s not a newbie in the league, but he’s not exactly a sophomore either. Tradeable, but possibly also useable in a Hawks uniform.

One way to proceed is to keep him around another year, draft another pg, and see who comes out on top between the two (or see who the GM and coach like the most). Here again, we run into the same potential problem, and a question that we are not likely to get a full answer to:

Are Sund and Woody on the same page? Is Woody around for the long haul? If he’s NOT (and only Sund and the ASG would know this, if a decision has been made or they’re leaning in a particular direction), then we KNOW they’re not going to agree on much, as it won’t matter anyway. If he IS around for the long haul, then agreement is paramount (and not grudging agreement).

Woody said they had some good meetings. I really don’t know what that means, as it could be about any number of things. I’m trying not to make too much of it.

Loyal Homer

June 4th, 2009
6:11 pm

Hey Sekou. Love reading the blog. Thanks for keeping us up to date with off season dealings.

FYI…myself and two other guys have a website. We’ve been debating Lebron’s actions after Game 6. We’d love for you and all the readers here to check it out and feel free to comment!

http://www.thesportsdebates.com

Looking forward to the game tonight!

darrell starks

June 4th, 2009
6:42 pm

What team is the best?
1ST TEAM STARTER ACIE, JOE, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD.
BENCH FLIP, MO, CHILL, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE 19PICK TY LAW, SOLO.

2ND TEAM STARTER ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH.
BENCH FLIP, MO, HAKIM WARRICK, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE WEST, SOLO.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

jhan

June 4th, 2009
7:24 pm

I’ll take #1

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
7:26 pm

We can’t get Hinrich without trading Josh. There’s just no other way to make the numbers work.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
7:32 pm

Ray, Hinrich as a substitute for Bibby.

I’ll be pulling for the Magic but I’m predicting Lakers in 6.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
7:35 pm

nire, I don’t understand. Why couldn’t we (in theory) trade Speedy (around $5M) and Chill (S&T around $5M) for Hinrich?

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
7:36 pm

I lied, there’s three other ways. Heh. But none of them really make much sense: 1) Trade Josh; 2) trade Horford + Speedy; 3) sign-and-trade Bibby; (probably with Mo, assuming Bibby gets a contract starting at less than $8M/yr); or 4) package Speedy, Mo, and Acie.

But we’d never trade Horford for a mere Hinrich, and the Bulls would be insane to take Bibby over Hinrich if they’re planning to bring back Gordon. Even if they’re not, I doubt that deal makes much sense to them.

The last deal is possible, but the only way it helps Chicago is if they’re desperate to unload Hinrich’s salary and/or if Chicago thinks that Acie Law is a steal. But something tells me they can get better than that from another team. And I doubt Speedy or Acie would be miffed at having little-to-no playing time, which would be the likely result of the trade – and Chicago probably doesn’t want malcontents on a roster already brimming with mild head cases.

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
7:37 pm

Astro Joe,

BYC rules. Makes signing and trading either Chill or Marvin to a team that’s over the cap a near-impossibility unless the player we get back has a salary of $15M or more.

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
7:46 pm

Astro Joe,

If you use Hinrich as a sub, you’ll be paying $15-18M a year (depending on how much Bibby gets re-signed for) and probably putting the Hawks into luxury cap land for a pair of merely above-average point guards. Hinrich’s salary is off-putting to say the least. I like Hinrich, but he is NOT worth $27M over 3 years. Especially if Bibby is making ~$6.5-8.5M a year for 2-3 years (which is his likely contract). We’d be crippling ourselves in terms of pursuing free agents for the next 3 years, unless we’re planning to let Marvin, Joe, and Horford ALL walk during the next 3 summers…

Ariose

June 4th, 2009
7:47 pm

You know, We COULD draft TWO point guards. One in the first round and one in the second. If woody can’t get it right after THAT then he defenetly won’t have his contract extended.

2nd round PG’s around the 49th pick: Tyrese Rice(BC), A.J Price(UConn), Lester Hudson(Tennesse-Martin), Eric Devendorf(Syracuse), Rodregae Barbaios SP?(Real Madrid).

It could work. Have you noticed that all of these years the two things that the Houston Rockets are neve short on is Big Men and Point Guards? I mean seriously that’s ALL THEY DRAFT/aquire. Yao, Deke, Juwon Howard at one point,and the rest of those big men over there. The at guard they had Brooks, Alston, and Luther Head. They like to pay for their SG/SF though T-Mac, Artest, Battier.

Sautee

June 4th, 2009
7:49 pm

Ken S,

Thanks, man. I agree on Hinrich and I’d be FINE with Hinrich and Acie at the point.

But would JJ?

Sautee

June 4th, 2009
7:50 pm

LOL at Niremetal. No matter what it’s ALWAYS about trading Josh! ;-)

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
7:54 pm

Sautee,

Trust me, I do NOT advocate trading Josh for Hinrich. Far from it. I was just pointing out that that’s the only trade where the salaries would also match up.

Ariose

June 4th, 2009
7:57 pm

“Raise your hand if you thought that Hinrich was as fast coming out of college as Patty Mills?”

Heinrich was a little lighter back then AJ lol. Also those sprints really don’t mean a whole lot. Like sekou said, it’s more important to look at a guys game than his combine results. We ALL KNOW that Mills/Lawson is WAY faster than Hinrich with a basketball in their hands as far as shifting gears and changing pace is concerned. Patty Mills has a lethal first step(CP3 and Kobe can vouch for this) and Lawson is a load to deal with in a full court trasition situation…

Ariose

June 4th, 2009
8:01 pm

Have any of you noticed that Heinrich has been in a 2 year long shooting slump? At least that’s what it seemed like(I only see them on TNT/WGN)……he managed to show up for the playoffs though……just sayin’

Ariose

June 4th, 2009
8:04 pm

J-Smoove 08-09 Highlights:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eFE9j2amzo

Nire, stop picking on Smoove… ;-)

Ariose

June 4th, 2009
8:14 pm

Wow! Joe Johnson Responds to all those fans who want him traded!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xziblS77I8k

I think he sent the massage loud and clear, just like always.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
8:26 pm

nire, no, I meant Hinrich as a replacement for Bibby… as in Hinrich becomes our starting PG and Bibby takes Team Dime elsewhere.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
8:28 pm

And I wouldn’t trade Smith for Hinrich either.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
8:36 pm

Nire,

Say it with me ” I(you) do not like Josh Smith”… Ahhh, you feel better now… Hope so, because Josh will be in a Hawks uniform next season.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
8:42 pm

Nire,

Just in. Speedy + Mo Evans for Hinrich works. Get it done Sund…
Say it loud again Nire. ” I (You) do not like Josh Smith”…

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
8:45 pm

Nire,

I post the wrong link above, try the one below.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=o4tjn9

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
9:06 pm

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
9:17 pm

Astro,

What’s your take on Courtney Lee? Rookie, 22nd draft pick, starting on a 62 win NBA finalist team….

Samuel

June 4th, 2009
9:30 pm

Magic need to forget the pick n roll and get the ball to Howard every play. The Lakers have no answer.

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
9:32 pm

Mel,

That doesn’t take into account the post-July 1 salaries of the players. Hinrich and Speedy are both taking pay cuts next season (and Speedy’s will be slightly bigger than Hinrich’s), which will make the salaries harder to match because of the 125% rule.

And take a look. I said that we SHOULD NOT trade Smoove for Hinrich.

O'brien

June 4th, 2009
9:36 pm

Astro Joe, Ken Strickland

I am a big Kirk Hinrich fan. However, from a money standpoint, $27 million for 3 years seems like a lot, especially since we dont know how much money the ASG would want to spend in future years (Marvin’s contract, Horford’s contract, resigning JJ, upgrading the bench). And I’m not sure what trade Chicago would be interested in.

Especially when we can try to sign a restricted free agent like Jarett Jack or Ramon Sessions (each of them would probably cost $5 mil or so).

Although signing restricted free agents is risky (not knowing if they’ll match), I dont think Indy would match Jarret Jack’s contract, because they’re still paying TJ Ford and Jamal Tinsley. I dont know if Milwaukee would match, because they’re still paying Luke Ridnour.

Or we could trade for Luke Ridnour if Milwaukee prefers to let him go instead of Sessions. His salary is $6.5 mil, but he only has 1 year left.

I am not a fan of resigning Bibby for $7-$8 mil. He is old, no defense, slow, no penetrating. I like his swagger and his shot making, but he’s on the decline, and he is too much of a crutch for Woody.

I say resign Flip, draft a PG (or keep Acie), and sign or trade for one. Hinrich, Jack, Sessions, or Ridnour.

Samuel

June 4th, 2009
9:45 pm

OMG!

The Lakers are in trouble. Nelson has some seriously fresh legs and his timing is dead on.

Sautee

June 4th, 2009
9:49 pm

Nire,

I never thought you were talking Smith for Hinrich straight up.

I’m mainly just yanking your chain for your OH SO thinly disguised disdain for Smith. And if I remember correctly he’s included in most of the trade proposals you mention. I’m sure you’ll correct me if I’m wrong. :-)

But, hey, I’m getting old and my memory doesn’t serve me as well as it used ….. what was I saying, now?

O’Brien, I’m with you on Bibby, and that’s from an old time Bibby fan. If he’s gone it would force Woody’s hand on offense. Plus our defense would get an immediate lift.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
9:50 pm

Nire,

Comeon, Speedy and Hinrich are both taking a 500K cut next season. We can always throw in Randmo (800K) if needed. Get it done Sund…

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
9:57 pm

Mel,

Why in god’s name would the Bulls take that deal? THAT was the problem I mentioned with the trade from before. I don’t think they’d even take Speedy, Mo, and Acie for Hinrich. Why on earth would they take just Mo and Speedy?

Sautee,

I don’t have any disdain for him. None at all. All I’ve ever said is that I think he’s not a SF and that Horford would make a better PF. Thus, he is in my view expendable for the right price. But we’d have to get either an All-Star (like Bosh) or a legitimate starting center (like Biedrins) for me to be ok with parting with him.

darrell starks

June 4th, 2009
10:10 pm

O’BRIEN why would you trade for hinrich plus he make 10million a year?

Ariose

June 4th, 2009
10:14 pm

Melvin, I COMPLETELY forgot about that guy lol. He’s a stud for sure. He gould be a great second round snag also.

glw

June 4th, 2009
10:14 pm

I agree with Nire, on the Hinrich for Mo/Speedy. I dont see that deal working. The only benefit I could see is they get 2 expiring contracts for next season. I think Hinrich is expendable especially if they sign Ben Gordon, but they will shop around and see if their is a better deal otu there. Maybe Chicago would consider it, but thats more like a deal thats did in October/November.

doc

June 4th, 2009
10:22 pm

ariose, i followed your lead and this was right next to it. gosh it makes me sick to think of this cat and jj in the same backcourt. this cat always was said to get to the basket and here is an example of what jj has to come up with in the off season. check it out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNQYAEXQ1nM&feature=fvw

cry in my beer. sheldon instead of this. i imagine we could have found ourselves in the gasol sweepstakes even without horford last year instead of going after bibby about the same time. we also would not have had to waste a pick on acie. sekou who decided on overlooking roy? was bk that stupid?

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
10:23 pm

Nire,

It’s simple. It will reduce their (Bulls) payroll by 15 mil after the next season.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
10:31 pm

Nire,

If the Bulls do that trade I suggested. They will have more than 20 mil to spend on Free Agents during the 2010 offseason where all the big name free agents will be available. Why pay Hindrich 9.5 mil (to be a backup) when they can spend that money a legit superstar such as Lebron, Dwade, Stoudemire, Bosh and etc?????

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
10:42 pm

Doc,

I just knew BK was going to pick Rudy Gay. I think he felt the backlash from picking the all 6-8 guys from the previous 3 drafts. Man, the one time he should have stood his ground, he gave into the Lanegiver (Shelden)….Even if BK would have pass on Roy for Gay, that would have been a good consolations prize.

niremetal

June 4th, 2009
10:50 pm

Mel,

When you’re a team on the rise like Chicago, you don’t make trades just to dump payroll. If you’re looking to unload a contract like Hinrich’s, you do it by finding a deal that saves you money 2-3 years out AND either makes you better now or gives you assets (i.e. draft picks) that are good down the road. The problem with the deal you described is that it gives the Bulls zero in present value. For a serviceable point guard like Hinrich, they’ll demand more than just expiring deal. They’ll demand Acie and a first round pick. Or they’ll strike a deal for a better player whose contract is expiring (which applies to a LOT of players way better than Mo and Speedy). So “saving money” alone doesn’t do it. Not when the asset you’re trading is in as much demand as a starting-quality point guard is.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
10:51 pm

Why would Van Gundy play Jameer the entire 2nd qtr his first game back after a 50 game layoff??????

O'brien

June 4th, 2009
10:58 pm

darell starks

there seems to be some miscommunication. I am a fan of Hinrich, but I DONT think we should trade for him and his $27 mil, 3 years salary. I think we’re okay signing Jarret Jack or Sessions.

As far as Milwaukee goes, if they take a PG with the 10th pick (as most draft sites predict), then that might suggest that they will part with either Sessions or Ridnour.

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
11:04 pm

Melvin, I think that if Pietrus didn’t have a ton of injuries, that Courtney Lee would have been competing with JJ Reddick for minutes at the SG position. Much like Chalmers in Miami, Lee’s getting time because of poor alternative choices (Reddick hasn’t roken a sweat in his NBA career).

nire, I agree. We don’t seem to have the right assets to acquire Hinrich. I have always pegged him for Portland… they could probably put togather a better offer. If Chicago had not made that trade during the season, they may have been interested in David Andersen as an offensive big. But that was then and this is now.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
11:04 pm

Nire,

You know that trading Hinrich for draft picks in return is dang near impossible with the type contract that he has (over 9 mil per year). The only way they could do that is to come with one of MannyT’s magic bean trades where the trading team has that much room under the salary cap. I can’t see Detroit or Memphis pursuing Hinrich but what do I know. After all, Im just hypothetically speaking…

kwooden1

June 4th, 2009
11:10 pm

Looks like the size and quickness of the Lakers will make it tough for Superman. I think Orlando will shoot better next game, though.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
11:10 pm

Its hard to agrue with Van Gundy decisions up to this point (especailly after the season he had) but to throw Nelson back into the fire like this after 4 months off, i don’t understand/agree with that decision…

Astro Joe

June 4th, 2009
11:16 pm

It’ll be interesting to see what happens in Game 2. Lakers have suffered from the Hawks-syndrome… they haven’t handled success well. I’m not sure that they have put together many good back-to-back games during these last few rounds… certainly not 3 in a row.

Melvin

June 4th, 2009
11:30 pm

Nire/Astro,

I get what you all are saying, the Bulls may want more in return for Hinrich. However, it may be diffcult for them to trade Hinrich b/c he makes stater’s money. It’s reported that they are looking for a low post player so I agree the Hawks may not have the right pieces if that’s the case….

niremetal

June 5th, 2009
12:16 am

Enter your comments here

cp

June 5th, 2009
12:25 am

I hope we stay away from Eric Devendorf even if it is a second round pick. He had way too many off the court problems. The one thing I can say about the guys we draft is that they don’t get in trouble off the court. The coach for Syracuse wants him gone too he is not worth the trouble.

niremetal

June 5th, 2009
12:32 am

Mel,

Not sure why you thought I was saying they would demand Acie and a draft pick alone. I meant that they would demand Acie and a first rounder (and maybe another pick) IN ADDITION TO Speedy and Mo. In any case, we seem to be in agreement that the Bulls are unlikely to go for it unless they test the waters and find nothing better out there. And while Hinrich is making starters’ money, there are a dozen or so contending/semi-contending/on-the-playoff cusp teams who either 1) currently have or 2) soon will have a need at PG; or 3) might be looking for insurance for an untested/old/often-injured current PG. I have little doubt that Chicago will shop Hinrich quite a bit before they part with him; from their perspective, there’s no huge rush, and eventually someone is sure to bite and overpay. The league is littered with overpaid and/or mediocre PGs (Beno Udrih, Luke Ridnour, Daniel Gibson, Jamaal Tinsley…Speedy…), which shows how consistently teams are willing to overpay to acquire a PG who they think might turn into the next Steve Nash (i.e. a PG who went from “not bad” to “pretty good” to “incredible,” with the last stage only occurring 8 years into his career).

Ed

June 5th, 2009
4:10 am

Got this from the Cleveland Plain Dealer talking about cap space & possibly having to overpay for bench help.

Especially when they’re going to severely overpay for bench size this offseason. This is going to happen. Prepare to be shocked when they’re offering Marcin Gordat $8 Million. Dwight Howard changed the NBA landscape on Saturday night, and the rest of the league will react (and overreact) to it.

terrell barron

June 5th, 2009
6:29 am

It’s extremely frustrating when I see a guy like Courtney Lee contributing in the NBA Finals, and Acie and Solo cant even get min in the regular season. Fire Woody! And hell no to Hansborough! Thats all we need is another undersized pf. Hello!!!

esaun

June 5th, 2009
7:42 am

CP3 is a nice pg who plays in a dribble drive offense that takes advantage of his strengths, while on d he has the luxury of playing passing lanes with Chandler patrolling the paint. If CP3 came to the atl i do not think Woodson would have revamped his offense to cater to him; he would have stuck to his Larry Brown-Bobby Knight philosophy of 1/2 court ball and intense on the ball defense. I can see Woody and CP3 clashing big time since old schoolers don’t care for rookie PGs running their offense. Hawks misfit organization would not have allowed CP3 to blossom like B.Scott and company did, how quick we forget a player’s 1st year in the league sets the path for his whole career. Besides, the hawks drafted Williams no. 2 and used him more as a role player while NO and Utah gave their high picks leading roles like you do top picks. No. 2 is suppose to take a build around guy and at the time the hawks had 2 SFs already playing viable minutes. The hawks took Marvin and made him a role player killing the beast he was coming off the bench in NC. Hope Cle makes a strong push at him because he would compliment really James well with his defense and big body for the wing. Danny Ferry needs to try and make it happen.

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
9:32 am

Trade horford marvin and the 19pick for CHRIS BOSH.
STARTER ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH
BENCH FLIP, MO, HAKIM WARRICK, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE SOLO, WEST.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
9:36 am

If we keep horford marvin and the 19pick.
STARTER ACIE, JOE, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD
BENCH FLIP, MO, CHILL, CHARLIE V, ZAZA
RESERVE SOLO, 19PICK TY LAW.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
10:11 am

Nire,

One more kick and this horse is dead.

Let’s look at that deal from this perspective. Considering Chicago is not going to win the trophy as constructed (with no low-post scoring). Let’s say nothing of interest was offer in return for Hinrich. What would be their next best logical move? I would say they would want to position themselves to be serious players in the 2010 free agent pool. Keep in mind that Brad Miller (12.25 mil), Tim Thomas (6.4 mil) and Jerome James (6.6 mil a player opt that we know he’s going to use) all come off the book next season (25 mil total). Now if they resign Gordon this offseason you have to add that amount to their payroll (let’s say 10 mil forsake of argument) which would decrease the amount of cap space after the above 3 players contracts expires.

Now how valuable would it be for them to pay their backup point guard 9.5 million? When that money could be use toward signing one of the elite big men free agents such as Amare, Bosh, Yao or Boozer (if he dont opt out this season). Wouldn’t that be a better investment of their money?

Besides, the Bulls made the playoffs this season and Hinrich dang near miss the entire first half. So I don’t see why he’s not expendable…

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 5th, 2009
10:29 am

Ahhhh Yeah- The king of links strikes again……. Whass up Salim Fan oops I mean Ariose. Im on that C. Jerrels bandwagon- That yung’n has an NBA ready game, he reminds me of Russel Westbrook with a better jumper.
I dont know if 19 is to high to take the guy but he could be a second round steal.
I say snag Earl Clark if he’s there at 19-unless we can get Johnny Flynn. Stay away from Mullens(raw) and the rest of these 6′8 wanna be post players -Has Sheldon Williams taught us anything

Im all for getting Heinrich -9 milli is a bargain considering what we paid Snail Claxton/ Bibby -Heinrich is an upgrade in every part of the game except 3pt %.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 5th, 2009
10:37 am

Our players are working out ha? Thingz that wont change next season

Josh will still be the same shooter firing bricks from deep
Horford will still be raw on the blocks (post moves)
Mo evans will still be 6′4 and get abused by true SF’s
JJ will still be Mr.ISO/Dribble King
Solo will pump iron all summer and get man handled in the post repeatedly
Speedy will continue to wear his Armani suits
Law will still look lost and confused
Woody will say “We just werent prepared tonight”

DAM IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
10:56 am

Can you see teams position themselves for this guy in the 2010 offseason….

Bosh not planning to sign extension this summer

Buzz up!10 votes PrintTORONTO (AP)—Chris Bosh(notes) doesn’t plan to sign a contract extension with the Toronto Raptors this summer and is preparing to become a free agent at the end of next season.

Bosh is in the final year of a deal that will pay him $15.7 million. While Raptors general manager Bryan Colangelo has spoken optimistically in the past about signing Bosh to an extension this summer, Bosh said that isn’t his intention. He said leaving his status up in the air could actually help both himself and the Raptors, who missed the playoffs this season with a 33-49 record.

“(When) I signed a three-year (extension in 2006)… I had a goal in mind, and that was to put myself in the best position (in 2010) … I’m thinking I just want to stick to my goal, stick to what I was doing,” Bosh told reporters. “That’s a part of the plan … I just want to address things (after) next season. There’s a reason why I did things the way I did them back then.”

Should Bosh become a free agent in 2010, he’ll join a crop of players that could include LeBron James(notes), Dwyane Wade(notes), Amare Stoudemire and Steve Nash(notes).

black man

June 5th, 2009
10:57 am

Hey AJC, the Atlanta Dream are in action tomorrow night. Why can’t I ever get any news about them?

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
11:02 am

Bosh is getting traded. I said it before and Melvin’s post provides further evidence. Dude is not going to re-sign in Toronto. Look for Cleveland to make a run at Bosh. They have nothing to lose in terms of making major moves for potentially a one-year rental. With Big Ben already discussing taking a buy-out to retire, I could see Toronto requesting Wallace and a few #1 picks for Bosh. That would give them cap space and draft picks

The Truth

June 5th, 2009
11:22 am

It seems like Cleveland is sucking up some air in the eastern conference regarding trade rumors:

Villanueva to Cavs?

This is being reported on SI.com

[http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/105350-villanueva-to-cavs]

Just to repeat my previous comment, if Charlie V is looking good to us then he is looking even better to other teams, as this is an example. I’m not going to belabor the point about our pace for acquiring talent. I hope it all works out but I’m still skeptical.

JerryWest

June 5th, 2009
11:24 am

Astro – Why would Toronto want a bunch of pick #30 from the Cavs?

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
11:32 am

Is it me or does Toronto seem like a revolving door for NBA players. Seems that no superstar player wants to play there. They may need to relocate to Seattle.

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
11:34 am

JerryWest, because they may not get a better offer, especially if they throw in Big Ben. I don’t know what else Cleveland has of value to Toronto… maybe JJ Hickson? Pavlovic? In the scenario I gave, they could look to replace Bosh with Carlos Boozer (as an example). I just don’t see Toronto getting anywhere near equal value back for Bosh.

I just read that Dejuan Blair has potentially damaged knees from ACL injuries suffered in high school. His agent is quick to point out that he didn’t miss any games in college due to ACL issues. But one would think that the combination of his weight and damaged knees won’t result in him being a lottery pick.

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
11:36 am

guys i hear all of the predictions and possibilities that you all have suggested, but i haven’t heard of anything that would make us appreciably better or even able to compete with the big 3-clev, orlando, and boston plus miami will be on the rise, chicago, and indy are goin’ to be alot better.

IMUS- are you still high on us gettin’ Javale Mcghee from washington?

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
11:39 am

Melvin, funny. I recall that Minnesota had the same issue. Even KG couldn’t recruit free agents to that team. Toronto will likely need to figure out a way to get under the salary cap and then trade for some brand name players.

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
11:48 am

do you all really think that 18 other teams will pass on ty lawson and will leave him available for the hawks.

also, what is the diff between ty lawson and law IV? why would woody play lawson and he didn’t play law IV as a rookie?

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 5th, 2009
12:24 pm

Ant- All day long…… 7 ft jumping jack with a 7′9 wing span, I think he would be a good compliment to Horford and Smoove. Mcgee would give up 3 athletic long guys to man the paint. i would rather have him than any C/Pf in the draft with the exception of Blake Griffin

Good points about Ac/lawson…… I cant see woody playing any rook pg significant minutes,unless the guy is all world and just takes the job.
I think there are pg’s that we may be able to get at 19 -who are better players than Mr.law .

1.Flynn
2.C.Jerrels
3.E.Maynor
4.T.Rice

When are we gonna wake up and just admit that Ac was not worthy of the 311 pick….What has this guy done, to make people fall in luv with him???? We pulled the plug on Sheldon and deservingly so, Itz time to take Acie off the breathing machine……FLATLINE…

Sum people are truly kidding themselves if the think Law is the answer to our Pg situation

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
12:42 pm

celts are shoppin’ ray allen and rondo for a package deal. would they take marvin, law, and speedy?

that’s the diff between our gm’s and other teams. they ain’t afraid to pull the trigga to get a deal done.

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
12:45 pm

ANT BANKS i have a team that can compete with the CELTICS, CAVS, SIXERS, MAGICS, PACERS, WIZARDS, BOBCATS, BULLS, HEAT.
STARTER ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH
BENCH FLIP, MO, HAKIM WARRICK, CHARLIE V, ZAZA,
RESERVE SOLO, WEST.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

G-Man

June 5th, 2009
12:46 pm

ant banks,

Really? Where was our gm when amare stoudemire was coming to atlanta? What about when we could have had barbosa or calderon for chill in a sign and trade?

G-Man

June 5th, 2009
12:49 pm

I.MUS,

I like jonny flynn too, unfortunately I don’t see him dropping to 19. However, you never do know for sure

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
12:50 pm

Lets pull the deal ANT BANKS horford marvin 19pick for bosh lets do it now rick sund raptors will take that deal in a heart beat knowing that bosh will be gone in 2010.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
12:55 pm

If we have nothing better than a #19 PG, who will likely be the 7th or 8th PG chosen, then sure, Woody will play him. He played Smith, Marvin, Horford, Salim, Childress & Shelden. He played Law before he got a clear upgrade at the position.

And maybe, the difference between Lawson and Acie could be jump shot and distribution skills. And if it makes anyone feel better, Woody has certainly been willing to play rookies who are coming off of NCAA championships (Marvin & Horford).

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
12:58 pm

Trading 3 more years of Horford at less than $6M per season for potentially one year of Bosh is straight STUPID. Whew, had to get that off my chest.

G-Man

June 5th, 2009
1:03 pm

Astro Joe,

That is an interesting statement about woody playing championship winning rookies.

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
1:14 pm

I have a rumor thats going around that i heard from satelite sport show in philly JOE JOHNSON FOR THADDEUS YOUNG AND SAMMY DALEMBERT if RICK SUND make this trade fire his a$$ now.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

O'brien

June 5th, 2009
1:20 pm

If I’m not mistaken, Acie had a very good jumper (including 3 pt range)his senior year (Mr. Clutch at A&M), so to say Lawson has a better jumper, we just dont know how he will shoot in the NBA.

I hope Sund has a crystal ball, because he needs to have an idea of what will happen after July 1, in order to make those draft picks.

The bad thing for the Hawks, is they could be left holding the bag. Or they might be forced to overpay if they really want a guy to come here.

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
1:22 pm

This rumor is true if rick sund make this trade this will be the worst trade in the history of this franchise fire his a$$ now.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 5th, 2009
1:49 pm

I would love to have Bosh here but only if he signs a deal first….Not intrested in a one year rental. Rondo? Allen…. Hmmm If we could give Marvin, Speedy expiring,Law,future pick.
Im all over that trade. then we could go out and get Charlie V before Cleveland does -he could easily replace Marvins production.

Rondo/Allen/JJ/Smoove/Horford … Thatz a trip to the conference finals if not the finals, but itz not gonna happen becuz -we are reactive instead of proactive…We never get in the mix of things -just sit around and wait all summer- to see who we can get for the cheap cheap….JEEZUZ

cp

June 5th, 2009
1:55 pm

darrell starks I read about that Joe to Philly rumor yesterday. That would leave us with no sg and I don’t see one in the draft helping us that much at all. I like Thadeus but we already have Marvin. Dalembert has an ugly contract. The only way this would work is to sign and trade Marvin for a sg but I just don’t see Sund making this move.

The scouting report I have read also say they don’t like Lawsons low release. Say he might have trouble at the next level because of his height and low release. To be honest Law was regarded as a better pg than most of the guys that will be available when we pick at 19 so I don’t see how people think a pg at 19 will start or get major pt over a guy who was regarded as one of the better pg’s coming out of college. Woodson wants a vet pg not a rookie running the show.

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
2:00 pm

ASTRO JOE- i 2nd that emotion, tradin’ jj for dalembart

Darrell Starks and Astro-do you think that 18 other teams will let ty lawson fall into our laps?

SWAT Native

June 5th, 2009
2:02 pm

@ Melvin,

Toronto’s problem is that I hear that Canada has something like a 60% income tax, so even if they pay a market salary a player gets to keep less of it. Compare that to playing in Florida where there isn’t even a state income tax and it’s a big difference.

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
2:04 pm

ASTRO, OBRIEN, STARKS- have you all heard that celts are shoppin’ rondo and ray allen? would you trade jj/marvin/1st rnd pick for that?

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 5th, 2009
2:05 pm

G-Man -Flynn is my guy, i’ve been following him since highschool/ All American game. I like his athleticism and ability to run a team, good passer too- that man just plays with a swagg and I think who eva passes him up will be kicking themselves later.

Rondo and Ray on the blocks huh? I wonder if they would take Marvin,Speedy,Chillz rights,Future pick. Probably not but a line up of

Rondo/Ray/JJ/Smoove/Horford would be sumthing serious. Then we get Charlie V before Cleveland does to replace Marvins Production

LLAW/Flip/Charlie V/ZAZA/ Terrence Williams/Toney Douglas

I dont think I would do the JJ trade to Philli unless they gave us -Thad/Louis williams/ and their 1st…… Woah even that doesnt seem like equal compensation

If were talking trades -JJ for Rondo and Ray -then draft a Sg to replace jj and eventually Ray

I can see talent all over Austin Daye but im not sure becuz of his weight and strength- 6′11 -192 He couldnt bench 185 once- which is a red flag to me but as i recall Durant couldnt either and we all know his story……Jus sumthing to think about

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
2:19 pm

That trade joe for young and dalembert make no sense rick sund unless they are cutting payrole ASG NEED TO SELL THE TEAM.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
2:21 pm

HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH THIS ASG STUFF PLEASE SELL THE TEAM.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

O'brien

June 5th, 2009
2:28 pm

ant banks, I would not make that deal. Isnt Ray Allen like 34? JJ is still a couple years from 30, and Rondo would not be as effective on this team (no KG and Kendrick to defend the paint), and playing for Woody (Rondo’s jump shot is inconsistent).

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
2:30 pm

Ant, I don’t think Lawson is that highly regarded by the talking heads, relative to the other PGs in the draft. So yes, I think there is a very good chance that he is available at #19. But keep in mind, there would likely be 6 PGs chosen ahead of him. Excuse me if I don’t get overly excited by having the 7-8 best player at his position. Pundits are claiming that the top PGs include Rubio, Jennings, Holiday, Flynn, Curry and Maynor. Supposedly, Teague and Lawson will battle for the next spot.

Law had a clutch jumper but I’m not sure that he had a more consistent jumper. It’s rare to see someone who can consistently knock down a 20-footer in college but can’t hit that identical shot while wearing an NBA logo. No doubt, dude was super-clutch and carried a no-name team into national prominence.

If Sund trades Joe for Young & Dalembert (which is likely wishful thinking coming out of Philly), then he needs to fire Woody and hire Keith Smart or someone who will constantly push the tempo. And he better draft someone like Budinger or Terrance Williams at #19, and he better get Philly’s #17 pick as well. That way, he could conceivably “re-build” around a roster that includes Dalembert, Horford, Smith, Young, Eric Maynor, Terrance Williams/Chase Budinger and whatever pieces he adds around those guys.

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
2:35 pm

I wouldn’t touch Ray Allen. He made some clutch shots in the plyoffs but he also showed that he is clearly at the end of his career. And I just read that the Celtics are considering trading Rondo because his teammates aren’t big fans. Evidently, dude has too many mood-swings. If he ticked off an easy-going coach like Doc Rivers, well, heaven only knows what would happen with Woody around.

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
2:41 pm

personally, i would not mind doin’ a one yr rental on bosh. we made the 4th seed without him. i think that with him, and non of our main players missin’ time due to injury (smoove, horford, marvin) i think that would be 12 more wins a possibly a 3rd or 2nd seed.

his 15 mil would come off jus’ in time for the f/a class of 2010

newkid

June 5th, 2009
2:46 pm

Joe, careful about reading too much into the evaluations done by talking heads. Most had Marvin ahead of Paul and Williams; Rondo was picked south of #20; Monte Ellis didn’t make the 1st round, nor did Agent Zero. Why would we spend the time and dollars to build an effective player evaluation system if we’re going to simply rely on opinions of talking heads?

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
2:57 pm

SWAT,
Good point…

Astro,
I’m sure Woody wants no part of Rondo especially while he got his hands full with JSmoove. Besides, wasn’t Josh and Rondo teammates at Oak Hill? I can see them putting the double team on Woody now… WAF

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
3:01 pm

Newkid,

Good point…

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
3:12 pm

newkid, sure, talking heads can’t judge the intangibles of a player. But since I don’t have the time nor resources to perform my own scouting, what other choice do I have? So I’m left with the standard resources most others use.

O'brien

June 5th, 2009
3:14 pm

ant

No way the Hawks give up Josh Smith for a one year rental for Bosh, and I dont blame them. If Bosh doesnt resign with the Hawks next year, then we are looking for a power forward again (although Boozer might be there if he doesnt opt out).

The Hawks should trade for Bosh only if they plan on offering him a near max deal next season. Bosh is looking for a (max) deal. Will the Hawks give it to him, and have the money to resign JJ, and resign Marvin? I doubt it…and the ASG is not going to spend that kind of money).

ant banks

June 5th, 2009
3:29 pm

this hype over the f/a class of 2010 reminds me of the hype of the new millenium. my grandmother still has cans of potted meat and bottled water that she bought waitin’ for doomsday to strike on at midnight of dec. 31, 1999. then the next day came and nothin’ happened!!

i don’t think that there will be any major moves durin’ the f/a of 2010, because the original team can offer the MOST money. watch what i am tellin’ you, the f/a period of 2010 will be jus like the day after dec. 31, 1999, NOTHIN’ HAPPENED!!

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
3:47 pm

Hmmm, potted meat! Reminds me, I wonder if those vienna sausages are still edible? Will find out this weekend.

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
3:48 pm

Ant,
LMAO at your 3:29 post. I remember expected Doomsday (1/1/00)…

Obrien,
Why do you find it hard to believe that the ASG wouldn’t pay
Bosh/Joe the max? Didn’t they pay Bibby/Joe the max this past season along with the approval for Sund to spend over the cap to pay Chills…

Melvin

June 5th, 2009
3:50 pm

Astro,

If these gas prices continue to rise, I may be eating vienna sausages too..

newkid

June 5th, 2009
3:58 pm

For my part I’m a results guy Joe. When a system that’s employed to effectively evaluate players and yield the best decisions and results consistently produces marginal to poor results, I stake out my ground by criticizing the system. Like you, I haven’t an independently developed player evaluation system, but the results produced by the ‘professionals’ in ASG-land don’t often escape the naked untrained eye. Sund shouldn’t listen too much to my player evaluations, but he ought to be held to account if he – using his highly priced system – continues to fail, fail, fail. Something or someone (or perhaps both) needs to go if the combination of owners, in-house basketball intelligentsia, GM decisions, coaching prowess, or players’ performances aren’t moving us expeditiously to competing for – and winning – the O’Brien trophy.

I enjoy watching and winning 47 games, but couldn’t care less about getting to 47, or 50, or 55 – and don’t get too enamored with the athleticism or other attributes of this or that athlete – if we’re not about doing everything possible (and not in 2015) to win the O’Brien trophy. Sund, Woody, and the ASG should fix those things necessary to arrange an impending romantic rendezvous with L. O’Brien, or get out of town.

Astro Joe

June 5th, 2009
4:28 pm

newkid, Sund failed when he was picking later in the lottery. Maybe he will find some gold where he’s picking later this month. BK obviously struggled at the front of the draft. Although he never had 3 consecutive picks as bad as Petro, Sene and Swift. I assume that the scouting/player evaluation staff changed when Sund was hired. And hopefully, he didn’t bring in the guys who convinced him that any of those centers were the right choice.

Frankly, the large contracts Sund gave to guys like Wilcox, Watson and Collison are just as disconcerting to me as his draft picks. I can forgive a draft mistake far more easily than I can a free agent error.

O'brien

June 5th, 2009
4:33 pm

Calling all cap experts, could you tell me what is the max (salary and number of years) Bosh could be offered next year (both from his current team, and from another team). Much appreciated…

Melvin, they traded for Bibby. And they had to pay Joe that salary to help entice him to come here. I just dont see them willingly paying Joe $16-18 mil, and also paying Bosh $16-20 mil. Especially based on Sund’s bargaining (wait and see approach) style

However, it can be done, because Orlando has a payroll similar to the Hawks, and they are paying Rashard $20 mil per year, while Howard gets $17 mil per, and Jameer Nelson makes almost $8 million. Thats $45 mil in 3 players.

ant

I’m with you. If I’m the Hawks, I make that deal for Bosh (giving up Josh and something else), as long as the ASG is willing to offer Bosh a big contract next year. How long must the Hawks (and Woody) continue to wait on Josh Smith to be more consistent, develop a jump shot, play within his limits, and get to the next level?

Big Ray

June 5th, 2009
5:00 pm

Newkid,

Agreed completely.

Astro Joe,

What I can’t get away from is how Law played in the preseason this last time around. He wasn’t just steady, he was good. Shot over 50% from the field AND the arc. And he was playing starter’s minutes. There was nothing wrong with his jumper then, and he was playing against other teams’ starters.

I really have no explanation for it all. Perhaps Law has spent more time trying to be a pure point guard, rather than the initiator and provider of offense that he was in college. The other thing is, when he’s on the court, I see a lot of well-controlled play. But I see a guy who’s also not looking to shoot most of the time. And who can blame him, considering who he’s on the court with.

On the subject of Rajon Rondo: I may not be the biggest Woody fan (you can laugh out loud at the understatement) but having a guy around that drags the mood down like that does NO coach any good, and no coach deserves to put up with that foolishness (unless he insisted on acquiring the guy, knowing about his problems ahead of time).

I don’t understand Rondo. He’s healthy. He plays on a GREAT team. He has a good coach. He has had the benefit of some very good veterans around him. He’s already got a championship ring. WTF is his problem?

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 5th, 2009
5:04 pm

Ant you wild’n out right now….lol Can Meat and bottled water,lol
People are so superstitious…I wuz living in Guam when the new millenium broke and those people swore the earth was coming to an end -I used to ride thru the residential neighborhoods and all u would see is white crosses on every lawn……. My goodness

Big Ray

June 5th, 2009
5:12 pm

Astro Joe,

Actually, Sund did bring in some of his old cronies. His right hand man is David Pendergrast. Like you, I hope he does not make any picks like he did with Sene, Petro, and Swift. Funny thing is, Swift really did have some solid ability, but damn if he could stay healthy. Collison had the same issues, to a slightly lesser extent.

Watch Sund try and move up…only to take Mullens…heh heh heh..

O’Brien,

Much as I like Josh Smith, getting Bosh is something I don’t think I could ignore. Sure, Josh may mature in the next year. Or he may not. It’s a gamble and a risk. Bosh is an all-star. A 22 and 10 guy. Every night. ‘Nuff said.

I like Hinrich. I realize getting him may not be feasible from a number of angles. Sessions looked good when given big minutes (Ridnour was injured), but I probably would lean towards Jarrett Jack. He’s a little bigger and tougher, with the capability of playing the SG spot in situations (at least defensively).

Big Ray

June 5th, 2009
5:21 pm

Not that I wouldn’t take Sessions. He plays uptempo, and that’s not something we do. Still, you don’t pass on a guy like this who won’t cost much. Especially since we already know he can play, and plays well. Hope it’s not a fluke.

Big Ray

June 5th, 2009
5:25 pm

Was reading up on Ramon Sessions some, and noticed how they said that the playing time/experience he got late last year did wonders for his development. I did a search and noticed that the PT he got was consistent. Yep….that and the time he spent in the D-League instead of warming up a bench seat.

What a concept.

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
5:32 pm

PAUL PIERCE 18MILL RAY ALLEN 18MILL KEVIN GARNETT 24MILL thats 60mill for 3 players and the hawks salarie is only 68mill why cant we trade for bosh?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

niremetal

June 5th, 2009
5:34 pm

Melvin,

One more kick and then I’ll walk away too.

Your last post on Hinrich responded to absolutely nothing from my last post on it. I agree that he’s expendable and that the Bulls may well look to ship him. All I was saying is that they could probably get significantly more for him than anything the Hawks would be willing to offer (since I’m assuming the Hawks rightfully would laugh if the Bulls asked for Smoove or Horford in return). Your last post said absolutely nothing that responded to that. You said nothing about why the Bulls wouldn’t hold out for a BETTER player with an expiring contract.

You brushed aside the idea that nothing better would be offered. That’s laughable. There are teams all over the league who salivate and overpay for borderline-starter PGs. I named 5 off the top of my head earlier and could name 10 more if I had the time and energy. Some team WILL offer more than two players who will be absolutely useless on the Bulls. So saying “Get it done, Sund” makes no sense.

O'brien

June 5th, 2009
5:50 pm

Big Ray, would you be okay with Jarret Jack as our starter, Flip off the bench, and then either Acie or our #19 pick as the 3rd PG?

I am okay with Jack as our starter. He will cost less than Bibby and less than Hinrich. He is much better defensively than Bibby, and much younger, and like you said, he can play some SG (when Flip is in at the point). The money saved on Jack can be put towards our bench (Charlie V, for example).

niremetal

June 5th, 2009
7:31 pm

Big Ray,

Re: Sessions, Acie, and the D-League: Woody seems to view unused bench players like friends with benefits – he won’t turn to them unless he need to, but he always wants them to be on call in case he does need them.

bigdave

June 5th, 2009
7:42 pm

If Sund were to pull the trigger on that trade involving Philly Id find him and off him myself…

you guys wouldnt have to worry about having him fired…

jhan

June 5th, 2009
8:39 pm

The whole tax thing is truly a variable on professional contracts. Unfortunately it looks like our country is trying play catch-up.

Ariose

June 5th, 2009
9:00 pm

Hmmm, save money or make a run for a title. Which will Sund Choose?

Hoops

June 5th, 2009
9:16 pm

Trade Josh Smith and Speedy for Bosh. The salaries are within $250,000 of each other. Toronto will go for that trade because they know Bosh will not resign with them next year. JJ will be a FA after next season and so will Bosh. Can the Hawks resign both? Maybe, maybe not, but that frees up 30.6 M for next summer when the big name FA’s come onto the market. That puts the Hawks in position to be big time players in the FA market. I say go for it!

Hoops

June 5th, 2009
10:12 pm

I just tried the Josh Smith/Speedy for Bosh trade on the ESPN NBA Trade Machine and I had to add R. Morris to the trade to make it legal because Josh is a BYC player. I still say this is a great trade for both teams!

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
10:57 pm

Since philly wants joe that bad give us iguodala and dalembert for joe and the 19pick now i would take that deal in a heart beat.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
11:01 pm

STARTER ACIE, IGUODALA, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD
BENCH FLIP, MO, CHILL, ZAZA, DALEMBERT
RESERVE WEST, SOLO.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Ariose

June 5th, 2009
11:16 pm

Doc, Amen man. Marvin is solid….even though I disagreed with it at the time, but Sheldon has to be the stupidest pick of All-Time in Hawks History. How can you leave Brandon Roy and Rudy Ga on the board like that? He should’ve been arrested by Fulton County police for that one heheheh…

I defenetly think we should invest in this guy for the cheap though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoiaKH1pptM

Tons of potential, about the same size as Chills and he will come for the minimum. He also jumps out of the Gym. Heim and Smoove on the wings during a fastbreak is redunkulous.

darrell starks

June 5th, 2009
11:19 pm

IF We traded joe for iguodala and dalembert no nba team will be able to keep up with us the hawks athleticism would be so awesome that every game would be sold out.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

niremetal

June 5th, 2009
11:42 pm

Hoops,

Josh won’t be a BYC player after July 1, so the deal will work then.

Darrell,

Uh…no. Unless we’re getting a mega-star, JJ should be untouchable. You don’t trade three-time All-Stars without getting more than that in return. Iggy is just 2.5 years younger than JJ and has a long-term max contract. You don’t acquire that type of player unless you’re positive and he’s a star.

Also, the salaries don’t come close to matching. Dalembert makes $11.4M next year and Iggy $12.2M.

Ariose

June 5th, 2009
11:47 pm

Two Slam Dunk champions on one Roster? Hmmmmmm…..

I.Mus, What up!!!!!

I Like Heinrich too but I’d be just as Happy with Patrick Mills at 19. When you’ve got Kobe and Chris Paul calling you one of the fastest players they’ve seen in a while you KNOW it’s serious. I mean did you see USA Vs. Austraila. What about St. Marys Vs. Davidson in the NIT semifinals? He gave Stephen Curry the business 26&12 to Currys 22&4 and they were guarding each other the entire game.

I’ll pass on Earl Clark though. I think that’s a wasted pick if we pick him. We can get Gerald Green for even cheaper and he’s twice as Athletic and the same size. None of those Louisville seniors stood out to me. The only guy who is nice to me on thet squad is Edar Sosa…..that kid has potential. Besides we still own the rights to ANOTHER SF(Chills). I think pick #19 will eventually be narrowed down to Mills,Ellington,Lawson, and Hansbrough by Sund in that order…..or whoever is left on the board at that point. But you never know with the draft…..crazy things happen, we may get super lucky for once, sund may pull a Danny Ainge and get us two all-stars(unlikely) lol. Clark is about the same size as Hansbrough isn’t he? 6′8-6′9. He would probably have to transition to SF, just like Hansbrough would probably have to. Thats why I say we just get Green, he’s played the position his entire life/jupps out of the gym.

Doc, I got the extended version just for you lol.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiCUNirJOFc

Ariose

June 5th, 2009
11:50 pm

J-Somoove/G-Green in 09-10!!!!!!!!!

Tha Hilghlight Factory is Back Baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

G-Man

June 6th, 2009
12:14 am

Ariose, Marcus Thornton is also a name I am hearing about at the 19th pick. He is one of two players we have actually worked out with the other being terrance williams. I’m wondering if sund thinks joe is expendable (philly trade) because management considered thornton to be our shooting guard of the future. They said he scored just like joe (the good version) and his favorite player is joe. Interesting for sure.

cp

June 6th, 2009
12:47 am

Ariose I like Green too but his skills are not as good as Clark in my opinion. Green still has shaky handles which causes him to settle for way too many jumpers instead of attacking the rim. Clark is almost 6′11 with a long reach and wingspan. Gerald is the better athlete and probably hits the 3 better but that’s about it. I was watching Green this past season and he still looks lost on defense and once again settles for the j because his handle isn’t strong enough . Talented kid who I would love to have on the roster but overall I think Clark has more skills and will be a lot better defender. I truly hope we don’t take Thornton at 19. He is a small sg who can be had in the second round. I hope Sund has not pulled a BK and already gave a player a promise that can be had later in the draft. I would take Terrance Williams over Thornton in a heartbeat. Hell I would take the kid from Xavier over Thornton.

Ed

June 6th, 2009
2:50 am

Grabbed off the internet

Scattered Rumors

•Q Score Up: Players who are being mentioned more and more in a positive light by NBA teams we speak to: B.J. Mullens, Tyler Hansbrough, Rodrigue Beaubois, Josh Heytvelt, Jack McClinton, Jeff Pendergraph, Omri Casspi

•Q Score Down: Players who are being mentioned more and more in a negative light by NBA teams we speak to: Earl Clark, Terrence Williams, Ty Lawson, Eric Maynor, Damion James, Tyler Smith, Wayne Ellington

A Tribe Called Quest

June 6th, 2009
4:14 am

If the Braves can trade away hometown/veteran heros, we should feel no holding back if we want to trade Smoove for Bosh/Amare

A Tribe Called Quest

June 6th, 2009
8:49 am

I’m gonna write this a few times during the summer, but it really annoys me that every summer all I read is that Solomon, Chillz, Marvin, Smoove, and Horford (last year) all look chiseled and bulked up, yet in the fall when we see them they all look wiry and rail-thin. 2 years ago we read about how Marv raved about how amazing Chillz looked and how much bigger he was…LOL. Every year I read that Solo has put on 15 pounds of muscle…Where? I read about Smoove looking like a bulk of chiseled mass last summer…LOL

Come on Sekou…you’re killing us

Sautee

June 6th, 2009
9:31 am

Niremetal.

Re: “Unless we’re getting a mega-star, JJ should be untouchable. You don’t trade three-time All-Stars without getting more than that in return.”

OK Nire, what was your take on newkid’s idea of trading JJ (and maybe #19) to the Wizards for Caron Butler, Javelle McGhee and the #5?

I don’t know that the Wizards would do it, though newkid made a decent case.

Is that enough for JJ?

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 6th, 2009
9:46 am

OMG!!!! Tribe Called Quest- I swear you took the words right outta my mouth. Report after report about nothing……. I guess this summer were going to hear-
” Josh is really developing a 3pt shot”
“Solo is working out and his body is the mirror image of Dwight Howard”
” Acie Law is really starting to look like CP3″

I mean give us something useful like when can we expect Speedy Claxton to be a former Hawk or Y we wait til mid august to start looking at free agents…. Jeezuz

Sautee -Im so hot on that trade I wish we had the front office to make those type moves happen. That would be sweet -

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 6th, 2009
9:51 am

By the way Gerald Green is a very athletic guy, i just dont think he has it between his ears to be sucessful in the NBA…… A yung’n with that type athleticism doesnt get cut outta no where there has to be sumthing else going on…… I would rather have him than Gardner,Morris,Speedy

darrell starks

June 6th, 2009
9:58 am

Nire why wouldnt you trade joe for iguodala and dalembert me i can see us making that deal not only that iguodala contract is only a avg 12mill a year for the next 4years dalembert would give us that big man that we needed so bad specialy him coming of the bench to match up with some of the big teams that we will be playing.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Ariose

June 6th, 2009
11:37 am

Maybe guys. All i’m saying is, because he hasn’t done anyhing in the NBA yet he can be had for the Minimum(700K) and he would be a great insurance policy to have at the end of the bench. If he turns into something, great. If not, then if Mavin or JJ ever goes down with an injury again, he can step in off the bench for a few games. Signing Green doesn’t impede our ability oto draft Clark or whomever else you guys want.

He’s a lot cheaper than haveing (5.6mill)Speedy Claxton at the end of he bench in a suit……and a lot more capable than R.Morris if pointed in the right direction i’m sure. Woody has been dealing with projects througout his whole tenure as our coach. He will stil have his vet’s. I just think that Woody will know what to do and what to demand from Green in order to make him a more disciplined player. You know, he’s ONLY 22. At his price, I think it’s worth the risk.Sign him to a 2-3 year minimum contract and see if we have a diamond in the rough. That’s all i’m sayin’…….

Melvin

June 6th, 2009
1:27 pm

Ariose,
I wouldn’t mind us signing Green for the cheap. I definitely rather him sitting on the end of our bench than Gardner, Hunter and Morris. I will give Speedy a pass b/c I believe he was healthy enough this season to contribute if given the opportunity (but thats another story).

Nire,
I see this horse is still breathing…

I already agreed with you and Astro Joe that the Bulls would seek more than expiring contracts for Hinrich (what else is there to agree on?). My last post to you acknowledge that and was written from another perspective. Hence, when I said “what would be their next best logical move”. However, you only see things one way and thats from your perspective. Since you insist that the Bulls will hold on to Hinrich for a better player and it’s reported the Bulls are looking for a big man that can score in the low post, please provide me with the five teams (that you speak of) thats in need of a starting PG (w/a 9.5 mil contract) that has a low post big they could send the Bulls.

Melvin

June 6th, 2009
1:41 pm

Not so fast (Lee Corso voice). Don’t overlook the Carolina guys according to CNNSI.

“Hansbrough, Lawson rising on draft charts?

Several high ranking personnel people are telling HOOPSWORLD that we have far too many unproven guys ranked too high and that we are not giving enough consideration to those players in this draft class that are proven – pointing specifically to Tyler Hansbrough and Ty Lawson as players that will go much higher than expected. The point most talent evaluators were making is that when push comes to shove NBA teams still draft winners over prospects and that assuming Hansbrough and Lawson drop into the late teens and twenties might be foolish given the NBA’s track record for drafting proven collegiate talent over bright young stars, especially those teams that are one player away from serious compitetion they are more likely to go with guys that played deep into March and April.”

cp

June 6th, 2009
1:45 pm

Trust me Ariose I wouldn’t mind having the guy on our bench either. He has all the talent in the world he just hasn’t put it all together yet. I would rather have him than Mario. Green and Moon would be two guys I would look at and bring either one in depending on the size of the contract. Hopefully getting released by a few teams has forced Green to work on all aspects of his game rather than being able to use his athleticism to get by. He still has a chance to make it because like you said he is only what 22.

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
1:50 pm

Melvin,

I said I had named 5 teams that have point guards that they overpaid for (Udrih, Tinsley, Ridnour, Gibson, and Speedy), not 5 teams with decent big men, although I’m sure there are a few. But as I said, I’m done with this argument. But you’d be a lot more persuasive if you bothered to read my posts before you responded. You’ve been setting up straw men throughout this thread.

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
2:11 pm

Sautee,

No. I lived in DC up until 3 weeks ago, and saw lots of Wizards games this year. Caron Butler is older than Joe, less distinguished, and less talented. I certainly wouldn’t mind getting McGee, but I’m not remotely close to being impressed with him. He was a garbage time player this year, but that translated to a decent number of minutes for him simply because the Wizards were so bad and got blown out so often. He’s athletic, but he shows zero interest in playing defense and has poor fluidity to his offensive game. I honestly was more impressed with Solo than I am with him.

In any case, as I said – you don’t trade away a 27 year-old 3-time All-Star who is the franchise player on a 47-win team if the best you’re getting back is a 28-year old 2-time All-Star (who wasn’t selected in the most recent year) who can’t stay healthy for a full season and who is the second or third best player on a team that peaked at 43 wins. I know people around here sometimes like to say “JJ isn’t a franchise player” but Caron DEFINITELY is not a franchise player. He’s never been the go-to guy in Washington even when he is healthy. This year, he was the second-best player on a team that won 19 games. People say Butler is underrated, but I don’t think that’s true. He has skills, but he’s never had to be the focus of the offense because of Arenas (when healthy) and Jamison (who IS underrated).

And the #5 pick doesn’t change the logic. If you’re a playoff team that still has room to improve, you don’t improve by trading your best player unless you’re getting something even better in return. I think trading JJ for Caron would put us back in the lottery, because I don’t think Caron is remotely capable of being the first option on a playoff team. McGee definitely would not be an improvement over Horford at center, and no one we could draft at #5 would make up for the loss of production we’d suffer elsewhere.

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
2:17 pm

And to anticipate one reply – I realize that you weren’t suggesting that we bench Horford for McGee or anything like that. My point was that McGee is not capable of being a starting center. At this point, I don’t think he’s an upgrade over Solo – and if Solo wasn’t deemed good enough to spell Horford, I don’t see why McGee would be either. If we’re looking for a guy to log significant minutes at center, he’s not the guy to look to.

Melvin

June 6th, 2009
2:25 pm

Nire,

I should have mention that my first post was in response to your post at 7:26 which you said “We can’t get Hinrich without trading Josh. There’s just no other way to make the numbers work”. During the time I was playing with the trading machine, you came back with your 2nd post at 7:36 (with other ways to acquiring Hinrich) prior to me responding to you 1st post (clear as mud, huh). I think the timeline may have cause some confusing. However, I noticed how you didn’t address/suggest which teams you think would provide the Bulls with the big man in return.

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
2:37 pm

Just so people don’t think I’m just hating on the Wizards…

I do really like a few of the guys on their team. Jamison is one of the best offensive players around…he doesn’t play defense as hard as I like, but he buckles down when he needs to. Mike James was like their version of Flip before he got hurt. Songalia always plays hard, and is a guy who would make a nice piece off the bench on a contending team. Crittenton still doesn’t play like a floor general, but I love his size and potential.

My favorite by far is Dominic McGuire. He has a lot of Mario in him – his motor is always running while he’s out there, especially on D. He’s big enough to cover most SFs and quick enough to stay with guards. He’s always crashing the boards and doing the little things. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him slip under the radar and appear as a key bench player on a contending team in a couple years, a la Bowen and Battier.

I just moved (back) to Philly after a 2-year absence, so I haven’t seen a lot of games in the post-Iverson era. I’m sure I’ll have thoughts on their players going forward. I also watch a lot of Blazer games on League Pass thanks to my Portland-native girlfriend, and there isn’t a player on their roster I wouldn’t want the Hawks to acquire if the price was right…

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
2:40 pm

Melvin,

They don’t need to offer a big man. They just need to offer something that is potentially of even minimal value to the Bulls – be it a lottery draft pick, a rotation player, or something else. Speedy and Mo probably would not be rotation players on the Bulls (the Bulls are already overstocked at the perimeter positions with Rose, Salmons, Deng, Tim Thomas, and probably Gordon). The Hawks also are not likely to be in the lottery next year, so there are about 15 teams that could “outbid” us simply by virtue of being a worse team. If you’re really curious, you can check out HoopsHype and find some teams that have rotation players with expiring contracts and/or decent big men. I gotta get back to work, and I’m not gonna be goaded back into this argument again.

Ken Strickland

June 6th, 2009
2:48 pm

OBRIAN-We have to consider what’s best for the Hawks and what’s acceptable to MWoodson, since he’ll definitely be the HC next season. Sund was obviously unable to evaluate and appreaciate the versatility, efficiency, maturity and overall value of JChildress, who Woodson relied on heavily. Therefore, can we expect him to do a better job of assessing the talents and value of MWilliams, ALaw and SJones?

Also, until we know who’s decision it actually was to rehire Woodson last yr, and retain him this yr, we can’t know what Sund is in a position to do. Remember, the BKnight fiasco demonstrated the SASSG’s willingness to take decision making power away from the GM and function in that capacity. As fans, and we can only hope Sund is equally as astute, we have to look at Woodson’s history and realize drafting a PG isn’t necessarily the best way to go, either for the team or the enfortunate rookie PG we draft.

There’s nothing that shows ALaw isn’t as talented, if not more so, as any of the PG’s coming out of this yrs draft, especially the ones that will be available when we pick. SINCE MGT HAS DECIDED NOT TO FIRE WOODSON, THEY NEED TO GIVE HIM WHAT HE WANTS, AND/OR THINKS HE NEEDS TO TAKE US TO THE NEXT LEVEL. WE ALL KNOW HE PREFERS A VETERAN PG THAT CAN SHOOT WITH RANGE. KHinrick’s contract is front loaded, so his salary actually decreases over the next 3yrs. If we sign Ridnour, we end up with another rent a PG, since this is the last of his current contract and we need stability at PG. If we can get JJack, that would be fine, as long as Woodson doesn’t view him as negatively and misuse him the same way he seems to have viewed and misuseed ALaw, SStaudamire and SJones.

MY STATEMENT TO BOTH SUND AND THE SAASG IS THIS. SINCE YOU’VE MADE THE DECISION TO COMMIT TO MWOODSON AS HC, GIVE HIM WHAT HE WANTS AND NEEDS TO BE MOST EFFECTIVE WITHIN HIS LIMITED AND FLAWED OFF/DEF. I want the Hawks to become consistent winners and consistently improve and get to the next level. The only way that will happen with Woodson as HC is if wee remake the current roster to fit his limited coaching ability, old school style of OFF/DEF and way of dealing with players.

Bottomline, whether we fans like a certain player or players means nothing as far as the Hawks style of play and ability to win or go to the next level is concerned. The only thing that matters is which player or players HC MWoodson likes. We’ve all seen what happens to those players he doesn’t like, no matter how much talent and/or potential they might have.

Sautee

June 6th, 2009
3:09 pm

Nire,

I’ll disagree, based mostly on finances.

This past season:

Butler $9M 20.8 pts. 6.2 reb. 4.3 assists

Johnson $14.2M 21.4 pts. 4.4 reb. 5.8 assists

Looks to me like they are getting a LOT more bang for the buck with Caron. Not bad for someone who is “less distinguished, and less talented” than Joe Johnson.

And when Jamison was out, Caron DID carry the team, so imagine if he had more talent around him. He plays tougher defense than Joe and I’ve never seen him take possessions off. Can’t say the same for our captain.

In the current economic crisis the teams that get the most production for the money will pass the ones who invest too heavily for the return they get. The one caveat to that is teams who already have invested in an established superstar.
I KNOW that you (at least somewhat) agree with that premise, from your posts about avoiding the Dampiers of the world, and from your wanting to hoard Horford because of the production we get from him for a rookie contract.

I say that $14.2M ($14.9 next year) is too much to pay for the stats JJ is giving us. Particularly when lesser paid players are giving similar stats.

It’s amusing to me that you think losing JJ automatically puts us in lottery land. Do you REALLY think that little of the rest of the roster? Or was that hyperbole?

And how is JJ SOOOOOO indispensable when he disappeared in the playoffs? Three trips to the All Star game didn’t seem to help him then, did it?

For $14.2 M, I’d like a player to at LEAST play up to his season average in the playoffs. None of the Hawks did that, but Joe is our captain and supposedly our leader. And as you said he’s more distinguished and more talented than Caron.

Oh, and I would have McGhee off the bench and NOT starting in Horford’s place.

I’d let Bibby walk and get a Jack or a Sessions and use the #5 on a future point guard. Or keep Acie and trade the pick and get more veteran depth.

I doubt that the sky would fall if we traded JJ.

But I’m sure you’ll tell me how it would. ;-)

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 6th, 2009
3:22 pm

Nir- Our first option gave us 11 points a game thru the playoffs. Caron would be okay with this team….. key word being (team)-with JJ on another team it would force the rest of our guys to step up. Caron Avg. over 20 a game -just say’n he’s a capable scorer.

Then with the#5 pick we could go Tyreke Evans or possibly rubio if he slips………\

You are really stretchn it with the SOLO over Mcgee thing….. Mcgee is 21 Solo is 25 -this was the guy’s first year -he’s only going to get better. When we played Washington in March he either started or played well over 20 minutes…… Results 18/11/2 and thats against our starters….
The guy gave Al and josh some problems in the post -granted its a small sample size -he is alot better than Solo right now.

Evans,Butler,Mcgee> JJ

Melvin

June 6th, 2009
3:47 pm

Sautee and Ariose,

I wouldn’t mind seeing the Hawks adding Caron to play alongside Joe and without giving up Josh/Horford. Not sure if thats possible but Caron is truly a bargain at 9-10 mil a year and he may be Washington only trade asset b/c Jamison and Arenas contracts are outrageous.

Melvin

June 6th, 2009
3:57 pm

Sorry Ariose, I meant IMUS..

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
4:10 pm

Sautee,

Ain’t got much time today, but I’ll it again: Caron Butler is the second or third best player on a team that peaked at 43 wins. JJ is the best player on a team that won 47 games. Caron is injury-prone, certainly DOES take plays off (I don’t know where the perception that he doesn’t comes from). Your statement about Caron carrying the team when Jamison is out nonsense – Jamison has missed 4 games over the past two seasons. The last time he did miss significant time, the Wiz went 4-8 without him and it was Arenas who was “carrying” them during that period (although Butler was also hurt for 3 of those games – surprise!).

Anyway, Sund isn’t dumb enough to make a trade like that, so I’m not worried.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 6th, 2009
4:11 pm

Zaza is prob. going to Cleveland.

ughhhhhh

niremetal

June 6th, 2009
4:19 pm

And as for the comments about JJ in the playoffs…uh, ok. I could see you making an argument that he’s expendable if he was healthy, fresh, and we won despite him playing badly (or if we won with him out hurt). But he was playing hurt, exhausted, and the team played like $hit. When JJ doesn’t play at his best, the Hawks have a lot of trouble winning. Don’t see how that makes him expendable. And I’d love to see you use similar logic to tell me why Butler is a better player. How is the second or third best player on a mediocre to bad team who is OLDER than JJ going to be an improvement?

And now, I’m done until after the French Open final. See y’all Monday. Go Federer!

O'brien

June 6th, 2009
4:19 pm

Sautee, nire

To comment on the Butler/JJ discussion. Keep in mind that although JJ averaged more points, rebs, assists, he also played 539 more minutes than Butler, and JJ also took 335 more shots, plus the offense goes through JJ almost every single time. In my opinion, the average is a wash (maybe Butler plays more consistent defense, but JJ has to guard quick PG’s too).

My concern with that trade, is that:
1) JJ is a SG, Butler plays SF (although they’re similar size)
2) I’m worried about Butler staying healthy.

Did you guys read Sekou’s article about Zaza? Zaza said after the Hawks achieved their goal of making it out of the first round, they didnt know what to do next. I was disappointed to hear that, because our goal should be to win a championship (as unreal/unlikely as it might seem).

boohooyah

June 6th, 2009
4:31 pm

r u guys serious about trading jj for caron butler? that just plain dumb, butler goes on the dl every time he takes a piss and only scores 20 cuz the other team is worried about shutting down jamson or agent zero when hes healthy. there isnt a 20 point guy in the league who gets more open looks then butler. at least jj knows how to fight through a double team i wouldnt mind getting igguodala for jj but butler? hell no

Ariose

June 6th, 2009
4:44 pm

Nire, I agree theres no way we give up JOe unless we get someone who is on his level. McGee and Butler are not. They both contributed to over 50 losses on the season.

Waht if Joe was ON during these playoffs? Would we even be havin these discussions? Have you forgotten about the Boston series? 20 4th quater points, and Smoove was just as clutch hitting evey outside jumper he attempted during our him victories in that series’. Josh was decent this year but joe was off. When a team can’t afford for ONE guy have an off-night that just means we need more weapons, not dithcing the player who had a few bad games. Remeber Marvin and Al being injured also contributed to Joe not being able to get into any kind of a rythym. Without those threats on the floor at 100% it was easier for defenses to focus moe attention on Joe.

How many 30pt games did Joe have on the season? I’m betting it’s close to or over 20. If you saw the Spike Lee joint “Kobe doin’ Work” Kobe said that he pouposefully deferred to his teammates in oreder to get them going and make them threats so that the defense couldn’t commit to loading up on Kobe. Our offense isn’t like that though. Optios 1-3are JJ and the 4th option is Bibby. Our first few plays of EVERY GAME is a pindown for JJ, while everyone else just watches. No ball/player movement or anything.

Woody is just making the oppostions job easier by running EVERYTHING through Joe. Personally I wouldn’t allow a SINGLE PLAY to be run for Joe until the second half of EVERY GAME. Remeber when he wasjust a spot up shooter in Pheonix? He led the leauge in 3pt FG% (45% from three to be exact).

Getting rid of Joe it’s not the answer. If Joe go traded. I would PERSONALLY find Sund and the ASG(With my mob of angry Hawks fans of course) and let them know what I think about that.

Hoops

June 6th, 2009
4:52 pm

FREE AGENT RESEARCH!

I had some time this afternoon, so I did some research on available free agents after July 1 that I would be interested in. You may have other FA’s that interest you that I did not include. Here’s my list by position ranked for my preference:

PG-Devin Harris, Ramon Sessions, Flip Murray
SG-JR Smith, Ben Gordon, Gerald Green, Dahntay Jones, Morris Almond
SF-Ron Artest, Trevor Ariza
PF-Drew Gooden, Brandon Bass, Chris Wilcox
C-Zaza Pachulia, Marcin Gortat

These four restricted FA’s in the PF position interests me: David Lee, Carlos Boozer, Linas Kleiza, & Charlie Villanueva. Marvin Williams as a SF.

I know this group is not as strong as the ‘10 FA’s, but there are some really great players available if the Hawks are willing to deal! Anybody got any thoughts on this group and the possibility of the Hawks signing any of these players?

Sautee

June 6th, 2009
5:06 pm

Nire,

For whenever you return,

I never, ever, said Butler was a better player. But I think he gives the Wiz a lot more at $9M than Joe gives us at $14.2M. Remember the very first thing in my post was “mostly on finances”.

I don’t think you even have an argument if we’re talking about who got more production for the dollar. And THAT was my point.

It wouldn’t have to be Butler, but there are a lot of folks out there giving numbers close to JJ’s for a lot less than $14.9 (this coming year).

I’ll look it up and return, but my argument is totally based on production / contract. And I think Joe was underperforming this year based on what he was paid relative to the league. If I’m wrong, you’ll get a mea culpa.

O’brien,

Understand that I’m not advocating that particular trade, but exploring the idea that with limited funds, the organization should be obligated to see where they are paying too much for the production they are getting.

And THAT should be resolved BEFORE we re-sign JJ, if we choose to.

Samuel

June 6th, 2009
6:17 pm

I missed the post but: I “would” do the Butler,McGee for JJ trade. McGee looked really good to me this year and Butler is pretty much even with JJ. I really can’t see Washington being that stupid!

cp

June 6th, 2009
8:22 pm

Sautee brings up a great point. Look I like Joe but there are players who can give this team the same production for better value. Joe is going to want more money his next contract but I don’t think he is worth it. Joe is a good player but he is not a star. He is a second option. Its probably a few guys who could come in here and put up better numbers than Joe if everything was ran through them too. I wouldn’t be mad if Sund was exploring some trade options for Joe. There is no guarantee he wants to stay here and to be honest Woody has worked the guy so much it might be better to explore a trade now for a younger guy and some picks. I just don’t see Joe getting any better and I can see the injuries mounting with the way he is used here.

darrell starks

June 6th, 2009
8:30 pm

I wouldnt make that trade joe for butler and mcgee first of all butler is 30 years old and you do not want to build around a player thats 30years or older unless he is a primetime super star.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Sautee

June 6th, 2009
8:31 pm

“I just don’t see Joe getting any better and I can see the injuries mounting with the way he is used here.”

Great point, cp

G-Man

June 6th, 2009
8:33 pm

Did you guys hear that Jeff Teague strained his MCL? Do you guys think this is a sign that he needs to return to wake f.? How far do you think he will fall if he doesn’t drop out of the draft?

Sautee

June 6th, 2009
8:36 pm

Starks, I’ve got news for you. Butler is exactly 16 months older than JJ.

So I guess by JJ’s next contract, he’ll be “too old” to build around. eh? Unless you consider him to be a “primetime super star.”

darrell starks

June 6th, 2009
8:38 pm

Iguodala is a beast thats only 25years of age thats only going to get better and the sixers want joe in the worst way plus they are trying to trade dalembert and we need a big man bad so joe for iguodala and dalembert right now because we dont no what joe intention are after this season coming up.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 6th, 2009
8:42 pm

SAUTEE dont get me wrong i like butler i just dont think he that player that can get us to the next level.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 6th, 2009
8:51 pm

Sautee how do you feel about this team
STARTER ACIE, IGUODALA, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD
BENCH FLIP, MO, CHILL, ZAZA, DALEMBERT
RESERVE SOLO, WEST.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!

Astro Joe

June 6th, 2009
8:56 pm

Here’s some breaking… the “second fiddle” on most elite teams ALSO make max contracts. If we want to become an elite team, then paying Joe a max contract is appropriate, even if we want him in the role of Robin. Anyone here think that Gasol or Rashard Lewis make $10M/year? This team isn’t an automatic playoff team so to only analyze performance based on the playoffs is illogical. We have to evaluate who gets us in the post-season.

Sautee

June 6th, 2009
9:16 pm

starks, until I see that we re-sign Flip and Zaza and convince Chills to come back, I can’t even judge it. Not enough info. This isn’t fantasy leagues. (and no accusation there)

And nor do I see Butler as a player who can take us to the next level. By any means. I’m just musing about the investments we have made and what kind of return we’re getting. We currently lack quality depth. If we could get similar production at ANY position for nearly a third less money, we’d have more to spend on quality veteran bench players. Nothing against JJ. I’m a fan, but he’s very expensive. Only slightly less than LeBron, DWade, Bosh, and Melo.

Only he’s NOT giving what they are.

Ariose

June 6th, 2009
11:05 pm

How many gmaes do we win without JJ then? Exactly, and how succesful have the Raptros been with Bosh? Post-VC? Two playoff berths, same as us. Except, we’re on the rise and they’re underachieving. Melo, can’t be doubled because denver is full of capable weapons, Leboron carried his team sa far as he could. We eliminated D-Wade. As for us? wE were injured and underachieved. If we were at full strength, I don’t see us getting swept and I don’t see the Heat taking us to Seven games.

Ariose

June 6th, 2009
11:18 pm

In My 4:44 pm post I give you this big diatribe about how It’s COACHING and not JJ and you guys STILL want to blame our BEST PLAYER? Come on. Can we be serious. We’de be lucky to win 25 games without JJ. If it weren’t for injuries to Marvin, Josh, and Horford we could’ve won 50+. Butler????? McGee??? Horford has his lunch money, and he’s keepin’ it. If we simply re-sign everybody Add Rasheed, Gerald Green, Our two draft Picks, and possibly Chills or someone else, we win close to 60+ games.

Clyde

June 6th, 2009
11:40 pm

darrell starks I like that team but Dalembert has to start over Horford. It sounds good but I don’t think Woody would like that team that much. I say fire him and lets make it happen.

Ariose our ownership team is too broke to re-sign everyone and add Rasheed and Gerald Green.

FIRE WOODY

G-Man

June 7th, 2009
12:04 am

Hey, I just fired up the trade machine and a Joe and speedy trade for iggy and dalembert worked. Do you think it would work if we threw in out draft pick?

Big Ray

June 7th, 2009
12:33 am

Interesting arguments about trading JJ. Sund would do well to entertain such thoughts, if he hasn’t already. The reason being two-fold at least. If you can get better (and it’s worth the investment), then you do it, particularly if you get SIGNIFICANTLY better and can STAY that way. No one-year rentals, please. Also, as others have noted- JJ is not precisely a lock to stay in town, and while Billy and the ASG were knocking down walls to acquire him….the sentiment may not be the same this time around.

So, better to be prepared for as many scenarios as one can, with more than one (or even two) plans for each. I’m sure somebody will suggest that JJ stands the best chance of making the most money here, with the Hawks. That’s probably true. And as much as this is about money, that’s not ALL it’s about with ALL players. He might want to win more than 40-something games without having to play 40-something minutes every night (an exaggeration, I know, but not far off the mark).

Having said that…Besides the max contract and what not, what makes JJ want to stick around? Something must improve. This past season was the best of the last 5, but is the best yet to come, or have we seen it already? If we have, then the only point in him sticking around is the best chance to make the maximum he can make. At this point, is the guy still as motivated to win?

We can’t judge somebody solely on what they do in the playoffs. But we can’t ignore it, either. The best player on a 47 win team didn’t even come close to his season average. I understand the usual refrain: “He’s tired.” A couple thoughts on that, if I may. One, I recall Woody saying that he rode JJ for so many minutes, so that he could make the all-star team. Okay, so what are we doing here, setting an individual goal in front of a team goal?

Two, there’s JJ talking about how he doesn’t want to come out of the game, and he always wants the ball in his hands, and always likes getting more shots.

Ok, between them, somebody better figure it out. At this point, the two guys who have the most influence on JJ are the same two guys who are contributing the most to the problem. They’re also the two guys most capable of fixing the problem. If you can’t figure it out, the two guys are Woody and JJ.

Woody swears he can’t take JJ out, and JJ doesn’t want to come out. I don’t want to hear anymore about him being damn tired. They can fix this. But they have to want to fix it, and be willing to think outside of that matchbox-sized offensive concept.

Big Ray

June 7th, 2009
12:45 am

Which brings me to another point.

One line of thinking is that we get to the next level by acquiring another high level player of JJ’s caliber, or thereabouts. Let’s put aside what we think it takes to get such a guy. Just concentrate on acquiring such a player, a person who presents as consistent a threat as JJ.

What happens if we can’t go out and get that guy? Does the world end? Will we be cursed to remain a 4th seed at best, forevermore?

If you can’t get a Bosh, Amare, or whomever you fancy, and still have/want to extend JJ, what do you do? You start thinking really hard about dancing with the one you brought. We can add all the “glue guys” and perfect little bench pieces we want. The biggest changes will still need to take place in the starting five, period.

That 1st or 2nd offensive option (and hopefully a solid 3rd) must come from guys in your starting five, although an electric sixth man also fits that bill as the solid 3rd option.

In all honesty, I think this is the way it has to work. Whether it’s a blockbuster trade or a change in roles of the starters (something many of us have screamed about for years) is another story. We’ll find it which way this goes as the summer wears on.

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
12:01 pm

Nire,

Here, as promised, is a comparison of the 5 players whose salary is closest to what we pay Joe Johnson (within $250,000), and a comparison of their production. I’m fully aware that different players, positions, etc. have differing responsibilities, but this is just a “blind test” so to speak. Not making judgments, just comparing production per dollar spent.

Player Sal. Min Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk

Dwade 14.4 38.6 30.2 5.0 7.5 2.2 1.34
LeBron 14.4 37.7 28.4 7.6 7.2 1.7 1.7
Melo 14.4 34.5 22.8 6.8 3.4 1.1 .36
Cbosh 14.4 38.0 22.7 10.0 2.5 .87 1.0
JJ 14.2 39.5 21.4 4.4 5.8 1.0 .24
Kmart 14.4 33.6 10.9 5.9 2.1 1.1 .63

Of these 6 players, one (Kmart) is older (31) and on the downside of his career. All of the others, if I’m not mistaken, were given max contracts at roughly the same time.

So here’s the question for you: Who’s getting the best bang for their buck?

How does Joe match up in production with his closest peers?

Remember that he plays more minutes than any of them.

I also said I’d recall a few guys who were giving production near to JJ’s for “a few dollars less”

Here you go:

Caron Butler $9M 20.8 pts. 6.2 reb.
Al Harrington $9.2M 20.7 pts. 6.3 reb.
Devon Harris $7.8M 21.3 pts. 6.9 ast.
Jason Terry $9M 19.6 pts. 3.4 ast.
Andre Iguodala $11.3M 18.8 pts. 5.7 reb.

My contention is not to just “get rid of Joe”, but to look closely at whether or not we’re getting our money’s worth for that big contract. We need to have the clearest possible view of that before we talk about re-signing and for how much.

It was a near consensus on the blog that Joe is a star, an all-star, but NOT a superstar. But right now, he’s getting virtually the same pay as LeBron and DWade. Shouldn’t we question that?

And doesn’t the organization have a RESPONSIBILITY to question it?

terrell barron

June 7th, 2009
12:14 pm

According to the Boston Globe, Donnie Walsh is seeking a sign-and-trade for David Lee.

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
12:14 pm

Wow that was hard to decipher. I’ll try to reformat:

Player Sal. Min Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk

Dwade 14.4 38.6 30.2 5.0 7.5 2.2 1.34
LeBron 14.4 37.7 28.4 7.6 7.2 1.7 1.7
Melo 14.4 34.5 22.8 6.8 3.4 1.1 .36
Cbosh 14.4 38.0 22.7 10.0 2.5 .87 1.0
JJ 14.2 39.5 21.4 4.4 5.8 1.0 .24
Kmart 14.4 33.6 10.9 5.9 2.1 1.1 .63

Big Ray

June 7th, 2009
12:45 pm

Terrell,

That is interesting news. Of course, it could be mis-information, but I kind of doubt it. Lee is a valuable player, but not someone that really fits D’Antoni’s system the way they’ve used him.

Big Ray

June 7th, 2009
12:49 pm

Sautee,

To stir the pot further, another question would be “Is he making his teammates better?”

When you’re paying this kind of money for a guy, he’s either making his teammates better, or simply being the relied-upon big time player who can take over when needed, regardless of what the opposing team does to stop him. Does JJ fit either description?

terrell barron

June 7th, 2009
12:49 pm

1.Trade Josh Smith(10.8 mill), Mo Evans(2.5 mill), Acie Law (2 mill), and Craig Claxton’s contract(5.2 mill) for the Big Aristotle(20 mill).
2.Draft Patty Mills in the 1st, and Jeff Pendegraph in the 2nd.
3.Bring back Chills
Bibby/JJ/Marvin/Horford/Shaq
Patrick Mills/Flip/Chills/Pendegraph/Solo
SE Division Champions!!! It’s that simple. lol!

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
1:33 pm

“The team that made the biggest push for Amar’e back in February was the Memphis Grizzlies in a deal that would have centered around Rudy Gay and providing salary cap relief for the Suns.” – Hoopsworld

Uh, wasn’t it debated on this blog that Gay wasn’t untouchable. Man, I would like to see this guy play alongside Joe, Josh and AL… Hint,hint

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
1:58 pm

Ray,

No doubt.

When we signed Joe, everybody (Joe included) thought that he would be “the man” in the ATL. What we (and mainly the BASG) failed to see was that Joe had the personality of a “born second in command” player. I don’t even think Joe realized at THAT point that he wouldn’t (or couldn’t) be the outright leader that this team needs.

C’est la vie, BUT we see from the extreme ups and downs of this year that we still have a leadership void that obviously Joe (and even Bibby) weren’t able to fill. A true leader would have kept his team from yo-yo-ing up and down to THAT extreme.

And I guess part of our frustration as fans is that AT TIMES……. Joe would be that player (Game 4 against the Celtics). At other times….er, not so much.

O'brien

June 7th, 2009
2:00 pm

tb: A big man who commands a double team and is a good passer would do wonders for Woody’s (lack of) offense. But Shaq for $20 mil? plus before he got to Phoenix, he was injured on and off (and Phoenix gave him nights off suring the season, I dont see Woody doing that). I think thats too much to pay.

I would prefer trading Josh and a couple others for Bosh ($14.4 this year). He is younger and healthier, and if we are wiling to pay him $18-$20 mil when his contract expires, I think he will stay (especially if JJ resigns as well).

Speaking of Joe, do we offer him an extension now (5 years, $80 mil), or do we wait and see how the season goes? JJ and BK were tight, but how is the relationship between JJ and Sund? Maybe Sund doesnt value him as highly as Woody does.

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
2:03 pm

Devin Harris is the featured guard in the system he plays in. That sstem is alos geared twoards his abilites by Lawrence Frank. Obviously, he didn’t have that kind of production in Dallas. You are not taking in to account Coaching and other situational factors (supporting cast, physical capabilities etc.)

Sautee, so if we do an even swap JJ for either Caron Butler, Al Harrington, Devon Harris, Jason Terry, Andre Iguodala.

Igoudala isn’t that great of a shooter and isn’t really a shooting guard. Philly tried that expirement earlier this year and it failed, Iggy wnet back to playing SF. I think we already have enough of those. I’m also pretty sure that Igoudala uderachieved cantractually based on the amount of money he is getting paid. Smoove’s numbers were down but we won 10 more games this season.

Two of the gus on that list Jasin Terry and Al Harrington, we’ve had here in Atlanta before(I’m sure no one wants to remeber those times) So how is that even a valid argement. HERES AN IDEA!!!! LETS TRADE JJ FOR HARINGTON STRAIGHT UP!!!!! YEAH EVEN THOUGH WE’VE ALAREADY SHIPPED HIM OUTTA TOWN FOR SUCKING AND NOT PLAYING ANY DEFENSE. WE OBVIOUSLY DIDN’T GET BETTER WHEN JJ ABSORBED HARRINGTONS TOUCHES RIGHT? OH YEAH I’M SURE OUR RECORD GOT WORSE RIGHT? YES I CAN SEE IT NOW, WE WOULD DEFENETLY WIN 47 GAMES THIS PAST SEASON WITH HARRINGTON INSTEAD OF JJ ON THE ROSTER. EVENTHOUGH WE DIDN’T EVEN COME CLOSE TO WINNING THAT MANY GAMES WITH HIM STARTING ALONGSIDE JJ. IT’S PRETTY EASY TO PLAY FOR DON NESON. NO DEFENSE INVOLVED AT ALL, SO I’M SURE NELLY DIDNT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR WANTING HIM GONE….

Terry is a chucker(like all Arizona Guards brought up under Lute Olsen), and Butler for JJ is such a joke i’m throwing up in my mouth right now from laughing so hard.

How about Billups for JJ, Ginobili, Deron Williams, Chris Paul, Kobe, Amare, Rashard Lewis, Vince Carter, Kevin Martin, Monta Ellis + Beidrins, Ray allen + Rondo etc. etc.

AND YOU CAN’T SAY JJ IS NOT ON THAT LEVEL BECAUSE HALF OF THE TEAMS THAT OWN THESE PLAYERS WOULD NOT HESITATE TO PULL OF A DEAL LIKE THAT.

G-Man

June 7th, 2009
2:05 pm

Sautee, way to do your homework man!

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
2:15 pm

Sautee, i’m not really yelling at you or anyone else, i’m just trying to prove a point. You say he’s a “second in command” type of Player. I agree with that. In fact, I’d say eveyone in our starting lineup are probalbly “second in command type of players”.

I don’t think that means we get rid of those players though. Nor does it mean we need a superstar. We just need a leader(Chauncey Billups). And it starts at the PG position. I think Patrick Mills is that gup, but thats just my opinion(I guess embarrising some of the most popular superstars in the NBA(in the olympic games) just doesn’t cut if for you guys).

I beleive we can be modled after that 04′ Pistons squad. Realistically we’re almost there. Resigning out Free agents and adding a few more pieces(Sheed/Harris/Heinrich/Gordon, Green, Mills/Ellington/Hansbrough) we will be right there IN SPITE of a lame duck coach.

G-Man

June 7th, 2009
2:15 pm

What about a Kevin Martin and Andres Nocioni trade for Joe and our 19th pick? km could easily replace joe’s production for close to half the money, and andres would be a great player to bring off of the bench.

c- al
pf- jsmooth
sf-marvin
sg-kevin martin
pg- bibby

c-solo
pf-zaza
sf-nocioni
sg-flip
pg-acie

ILL-logical

June 7th, 2009
2:26 pm

Well one area that Mr. Sund and Woodson seem to agree on is that the Pistons of the Chauncy,’Sheed, Ben Wallace years is the model that they are using to build this franchise. Sounds good but is today’s NBA championship attainable using that approach?

Don’t know but if the Lakers hold serve and win this year, I don’t think so. In fact, there will be a run on solid bigs who can run,shoot and defend the paint whoever wins because of the emphasis on post play in the serise so far.

So how will our designated geniuses deal with that state of affairs?

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
3:19 pm

Ariose,

Man go back and read what I actually posted. At NO time have I proposed swapping Joe for ANY one player. Never.

Once again, I’m questioning the production we’re getting from him relative to the money paid out. If the BASG does NOT do this before re-signing Joe than they are even more lame than we all thought. It’s basic business practice.

I’m not saying I WANT any of the players on that list (though I’d take Devon Harris in a heartbeat, but NOT for Joe straight up). I’m pointing out that production relative to cost can NOT be ignored. And that other teams are getting something close to the same production for MANY fewer millions of dollars.

It’s the same as niremetal not wanting (correctly in my opinion) to trade Horford while he’s on a rookie contract. It’s asset management, from a cost perspective.

You saw the figures. If we’re gonna pay JJ that much, then we either need to get more production from him, or he needs to do more to raise the level of his teammates. Once again, we’re paying him virtually the same as LeBron and DWade. Can you sit there and tell me with a straight face that he’s producing like them, or making his teammates better to the same degree?

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
3:43 pm

G man,

Thanks.

And about your trade idea with SAC, 2 things. One, you assume Bibby will be back (which is NOT a certainty) but assuming he is, did he and Martin have any issues in SAC?

And secondly, in Woody’s offense Martin would have the ball in his hands a LOT and he’s much more turnover prone than JJ.

But I like that way of thinking, and I DO like Nocioni off the bench.

terrell barron

June 7th, 2009
3:47 pm

Obrien, Shaq’s contract ends after next season, while Bosh is going to command a longterm deal. Will the ASG be willing to pay both Bosh and JJ longterm? I doubt it. Plus when Shaq comes off the books, we can go out and sign a big time free-agent in 2010. We could then go after Bosh.

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
3:47 pm

Sautee,

I gotta laugh at anyone who puts up stats as the measure of what a player brings to the table. Come on.

How about Isaiah Rider? In his only season with us, he put up numbers that actually were slightly BETTER than what Steve Smith had put up the year before we traded him. Did that mean trading for Rider’s “production” made us better? Of course not. Rider was an awful defender, which the stats didn’t show. And he was a much more selfish player than Smitty, despite the fact that he averaged more assists per game in 99-00 than Smitty had in 98-99.

How about Shane Battier? He doesn’t put up gaudy defensive numbers. But he makes the whole team better defensively because whoever he guards pretty much never needs to be double teamed. JJ has a mirror image of that effect on defense – he ALWAYS needs to be double teamed, which makes the rest of the team more efficient offensively (albeit the overall efficiency is very limited by Woody’s system). To quote a great article on Battier:
For most of its history basketball has measured not so much what is important as what is easy to measure — points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocked shots — and these measurements have warped perceptions of the game.

Of all the guys you mentioned as “bargains” in terms of production, how many of them get double or triple teamed every time they touch the ball? How many of them are even the first option on their team? Terry is option 3 or 4 on a better team. Butler is option 2 or 3 on a far worse team. Harris is option 2 on a far worse team. Iguodala is the only one who is the first option…but he’s on a worse team and is not asked to handle the ball nearly as much as JJ is nor is he ever tasked with guarding the opposing team’s best defender. Still, he is the ONLY one in that bunch who I’d consider trading JJ for. And even then, I probably wouldn’t do it unless I was pretty damned sure we were gonna lose JJ in free agency next summer.

Al Harrington? Please. Ariose covered that. I’ll just add that anyone who plays under D’Antoni and Nellie will put up gaudy stats.

Also, none but Harris is assigned lead guard duties even 10% of the time that he’s on the floor (I’d say JJ is assigned it 40% of the time). Not a single one of the guys you listed is asked to guard the opposing team’s best perimeter player.

To paraphrase Jerry Maguire, none of them are even asked to do anything that’s even remotely close to being in the same vicinity of what JJ is asked to do. And with the exception of Terry (who is asked to do the LEAST of all the people you mentioned), all of them are asked to less on worse teams.

JJ EARNS his 21ppg. His presence on the floor opens things up for everyone else. I admit that he’s not LeBron, Kobe, D-Wade, or even Melo. But I put him easily on the same footing as Bosh and well above guys like Kmart, Rashard Lewis, Iverson (the model that got his most recent extension, not the ‘00 model), Bibby, and most other people who make as much or more than JJ does.

The Magic are overpaying Rashard Lewis, but he’s playing for a ring now. The Celtics are overpaying Ray Allen, and they won a title. If you want to contend for titles, you don’t do it by subtracting guys like JJ just because they come with a hefty price tag. You do it by surrounding them with other guys who play at an All-Star level.

I hope you’re still just playing Devil’s Advocate. Because otherwise, you sound a lot like Clyde, who can’t see past the numbers when he evaluates players.

terrell barron

June 7th, 2009
3:49 pm

Obrie, maybe the ownership situation will be settled by then. By 2010, I mean.

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
4:10 pm

Sautee,

“Man go back and read what I actually posted. At NO time have I proposed swapping Joe for ANY one player. Never.”

I know you didn’t, that was just my arguement. Although stats may be the same from a production standpoint, the end result(wins and losses) will not.

No, I cannot honestly say that Joe does more for his team than those superstars that you listed, but every player has his/her limitaions. Historically, Joe’s is 25ppg. In 2010 when the rest of the young supertars get a significant cash upgrade, I don’t think Joe desrves a FULL upgrade. I do beleive he sould stay within the 14-18 Million dollar range. I also don’t think he will have a problem with this if he is committed to the franchise and wants the organization to add more pieces in order for the Hawks to be successful in the future.

I also beleive that coaching has/is hindering our teams performance at the moment. I do not beleive that our players are being put in the best positions possible in order for them to be successful. That is not Marvin, Josh, or JJ’s fault by any means. Something has got to change. One thing that won’t is the leauges perception of Joe Johnson. The guy is a stud. First one on the court every day in practice and one of the last to leave. He is a true professional, and i’m sure his high character rubbes off on the young guys.

It wasn’t all about the money with Joe. Pheonix played the waiting game with Joe like Sund did with Childress. Joe was offended by this and felt like if the oganization really valued him, they would have offerd him a contract instead of waiting for someone else to name Joe’s value. So when Billy Knight came knocking, Joe felt appreciated and jumed ship. I am of course refrencing the sports south special “Spotlight Joe Johnson”.

I’m sure if Sund puts a reasonable offer on the table EARLY, Joe will not have a problem negotiating a REASONBLE price for his next contract.

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
4:26 pm

Nire, EXACTLY…….Amen….CAN I GET A WITNESS!!!!!!!!

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
4:37 pm

We need a better coach(or a change in his philosphy) and a stronger supporting cast for JJ. Thats it. Like nire said, JJ EARNS his money.

In the games that Joe missed this season, even though we won them, we had to come back from HUGE(20+ points) defecits in order to win, and those we against the bottomfeeders of the leauge.

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
4:38 pm

Nire,

OF COURSE I’m playing Devil’s Advocate. It’s the offseason! ;-)

That said, I STILL think that the BASG needs to look at exactly what they are getting for their $14.9M BEFORE offering a max extension.

And of course I agree that Joe gives us some intangibles. Of course he does. Not all positive, but of course he does. ;-)

Look, everybody keeps talking about the 04 Pistons as a model. But when Sheed re-signed with them after that season, his pay went DOWN from $16.9M to $9.72M. And that was after winning a championship! That gave Dumars the flexibility to sign McDyess and continue their run for 4 more years.

So if THAT is our model, do you reckon Sund will be asking Joe to take a pay cut? We didn’t even get out of round 2.

“I admit that he’s not LeBron, Kobe, D-Wade, or even Melo.”

But we’re PAYING him virtually what they get paid, right?

Once again, shouldn’t we question that? Or is your manlove for Joe so awesome that you can’t see a valid question when it smacks you in the face?

If he’s PAID like them, but you admit that he’s NOT like them, where does that leave us? Is it not valid to question his pay?

One more question. Do you think it’s likely that Joe will continue to improve, playing the minutes he’s asked to play, or will there be a ceiling to his production?

And WHEN, (once again being mindful of his minutes,) will there be a tailing off?

Doesn’t this NEED to be taken into account by management?

Astro Joe

June 7th, 2009
4:54 pm

If the Hawks have to wait for a proven superstar to join their team before signing someone to a max contract (as opposed to rolling the dice for a player on the come), well, let’s all get comfortable watching the draft lottery each and every year.

O'brien

June 7th, 2009
5:03 pm

Sautee, you raise a very good point. Its all about getting the most bang for your buck. And I agree with Ray. I hope Sund is looking at it from now. Do not wait until next offseason when you might have a bidding war.

Nobody (around the league) is talking about JJ being a free agent next year. All you hear about is Bosh, Wade, LeBron (even Nash). But I think Sund should talk to JJ about an extension (because if he waits until after next season, Joe’s value might go way up. If His value goes down, then that would mean that the Hawks did not have a good year).

Cleveland might need another Robin to go with Lebron in 2010. What if Wade leaves Miami and goes to Chicago? Then Miami needs a SG. Maybe Toronto convinces Bosh to stick around while they go after JJ. If I am Sund, I offer JJ a contract close to what he makes now, and convince him that the money we save on his contract will go towards upgrading the team.

It’s hard to put a number on Joe’s value, because how much of it is due to lack of coaching/lack of an offense/lack of a defensive PG? But I am worried about all the minutes he is playing, and when does his body start breaking down (if Woody continues to ride him)?

My max figure for Joe is 5 years, $80 mil. Sign a PG for less than $6 mil per year (Jack or Sessions), and we should be able to afford to give Bosh $18-$20 mil per year.

Astro Joe

June 7th, 2009
5:04 pm

Sautee, is Joe’s average production below the average production of the maxed-out player? That would be the fair analysis. You can’t take the players at the top end of production and ignore the Marbury’s, Stevie Franchises and Szcerbiak’s at the bottom of it. I don’t know the answer but I do know that if we lose Joe because we don’t want to give our 3-time All-Star and guy who led the team out of a nine year playoff drought an extra $2M/year when he turns 28 or 29, well, I wonder what proven superstar will be anxious to join us to keep us out of the lottery. I suspect that teams hurt themselves more when they give a guy double his production (like AK-47, Dampier or Shaq) as opposed to maybe 15-20% more than he deserves.

ant banks

June 7th, 2009
5:07 pm

i say pull the trigga on a one year rental for bosh!! trade the rights to smoove or and some picks, etc. yeah, there is no guarantee that we can get him to re-up, but what the worst case scenario if he doesn’t? we get 15mil off the books for 2010 season at worst.

jj, bibby (if we can get him), marvin, bosh, horford. you mean we can’t get out of the 2nd round with this line-up? besides, we may be able to re-sign bosh, he does love atlanta and he went to college hear.

Dennis

June 7th, 2009
5:09 pm

Hawks need to take Johnny Flynn if he’s available, or trade up for him. He’s like Chris Paul in a lot of ways, and possibly a better athlete with a better(6′4″) wingspan, & hops. They need to package someone w/their pick to get this guy. He will be the real deal. He’s got the leadership skills. Hawks, listen up!

G-Man

June 7th, 2009
5:14 pm

Dennis, I agree with you 100%. Flynn is the real deal.

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
5:26 pm

AJ,

I took the 5 salaries closest to Joe’s. It COULD have been a Marbury or a Francis, but it wasn’t. I don’t think that’s an unfair way to compare. I didn’t go LOOKING for high production to compare him to. That’s where he fell in the salary scale. So I think it’s absolutely fair to compare his production to players he’s paid the same as. Doesn’t that happen at your place of work?

Look, when we signed Joe to a max contract, we thought we’d get something along the lines of DWade. We didn’t. That doesn’t make Joe a failure in my eyes, it just means that Billy was so eager that he slightly overpaid. But just slightly.

It happens every day in the NBA. The trick is, to correct without over correcting for the NEXT contract.

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
5:39 pm

From Ariose:

“It wasn’t all about the money with Joe. Pheonix played the waiting game with Joe like Sund did with Childress. Joe was offended by this and felt like if the oganization really valued him, they would have offerd him a contract instead of waiting for someone else to name Joe’s value. So when Billy Knight came knocking, Joe felt appreciated and jumed ship. I am of course refrencing the sports south special “Spotlight Joe Johnson”.”

Thanks, Ariose, for the memory.

Poor Niremetal.

Here he is, one of the biggest JJ defenders in the Northern Hemisphere, but HE thinks that “hurt feelings” as a cause for signing a contract is, as he puts it, BS (or at least as it pertained to Childress)!!!!!!

Oh the irony here on the old blog.

It’s delicious!

Nire, is it still BS when it’s your boy Joe saying it?

cp

June 7th, 2009
5:39 pm

I was just reading about how Patty Mills is slipping in the draft. They say he did little in this tournament to change most gm’s mind about his game. They pointed out he did more shooting than actually setting his teammates up. Take it for what its worth.

When Joe was hurt our offense looked better in my opinion. Woodson wasn’t relying on Joe so much so it got other guys involved. I know Joe is the number one option here but those stats Bradley put up of him a few weeks back said a lot. He takes more shots than some NBA stars and Joe is not even close to being a star. I know he is doubled and yada yada yada but people fail to mention how slow he reacts to those double teams, or how he pounds and pounds the ball, or the bad shots he takes. Maybe it is the offense but Joe has to take some blame as well. We really need to get an offensive minded coach in here to get us a real system that way Joe is not asked to do everything and other guys can get involved in the offense. As I said before I just don’t see Joe getting any better. Woodson has ran him down. His shooting percentages are nothing like they once were and for a guy who plays as many minutes and takes as many shots one would think he would produce more. Trying to get the guy into all star games, forcing him to defend other teams pg’s , and running everything through him will catch up to Joe soon if it already hasn’t.

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
6:32 pm

Uh…ok. Way to twist my words. Not even gonna go there. My argument wasn’t that hurt feelings was never the reason for a player to leave a team. My argument was that it wasn’t the actual reason that Childress left. But nice try. I think JJ left Phoenix because he didn’t see himself as a fourth option on offense and thought he could play a bigger role on a winning team than he could if he took lower pay to stay in Phoenix (and four years out, whaddya know – JJ was scoring 21ppg and was the only member of that Suns starting 5 that was still playing in May). I think Chill left because he couldn’t find any NBA team in a position to sign or trade for him to offer him anything close to what he could make in Greece, and so he said “Hey, I’m 25, unmarried, and love to travel – why not take the extra pay, avoid the income tax, and go to Greece for a year or two and hope that some team is willing and able to pay me more when I get back?”

But to answer your “question” anyway, I think that disrespect from the GM is a BS reason to leave a team. If you want to play for a winning team, you look not only at the salary figure you get, but how you best can see yourself fitting in on a team. I think it’s stupid to value your ego more than how much you’ll enjoy the day-to-day job, and I think it’s also stupid to value your ego more than money (and yes, with most people the two can be separated). Jerry Krause probably insulted more players than we can count (including Michael Jordan and Phil Jackson), but there were enough guys willing to deal with it because they realized they could be part of something special if they stayed. So if JJ’s main or only reason for leaving Phoenix was that he was insulted by their low contract offer, then yeah, he was arrogant. Same with Chill and us last year. Same with Marvin if he does the same thing this year. But I don’t buy the idea that hurt feelings actually was the reason JJ or Chill jumped ship. I think it was because JJ thought he was capable of being more than he could be in Phoenix, and Chill had a variety of practical reasons to go. That’s different than just leaving because you feel disrespected in a egotistical sense.

And poor me? I say poor Sautee. So desperate to get some Devil’s Advocacy on the blog that he actually argues that it’s “fair” to compare JJ’s pay with the pay of 4 guys who get paid roughly the same but ignore the 25 people who get paid more, most of whom are pretty much unquestionably lesser players than JJ.

Look at the next 4 above the 5 you misleadingly* (see below) placed alongside JJ. Arenas, Ben Wallace, Odom, and Zach Randolph. Why don’t you put up THEIR numbers and compare? Oh, sorry, that would show how foolish this “production and pay” reasoning is. How about Kirilenko? Vince? Bibby? Redd? Rashard? Marion? Francis? Marbury? T-Mac? Kidd? Iverson? And those are just the players who I submit every GM would dump for JJ in a heartbeat. If I looked at the 10 players below K-Mart, I bet I could find some real beauties.

* In any case, this “pay-based-reasoning” is misleading anyway because of the NBA salary structure and cap rules, which create max amounts that players can get at different stages in their careers and leave how much players get signed to the vicissitudes of fate. JJ was drafted in ‘01. LeBron, D-Wade, Bosh, and Melo all came out all got max extensions from their original teams, which allows for much bigger year-to-year raises. If you made this same chart in 30 days, once the ‘09-’10 become the players’ official salaries, those four would jump way higher than JJ in relative salary. If you made the chart a year ago (when their “productions” were pretty much the same), JJ was actually getting paid $500k more. But it wasn’t because he was “overpaid.” I could come up with infinite examples like that. Snapshots of players salaries for a given year are a horribly misleading way of “comparing” players with the NBA screwed up cap rules and collective bargaining agreement.

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
6:35 pm

That’s right. I just said “vicissitudes.” You got a problem with that? ;)

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
6:55 pm

Gotta go for the night (again). See y’all in a day or two. Until then, stand ye steady and GO MAGIC!!!!!!

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
7:21 pm

Also, JJ was not offerd a contract by the Pheonix Suns. They mad him go and find an offer.

I would be pissed too. JJ was like: “MAAANN, I JUST BROKE MY FACE FOR THIS ORGANIZATION AND CAME BACKE FOR THE PLAYOFFS DESPITE DOCTORS ORDERS TO HELP THIS TEAM AND Y’ALL CAN’T EVEN GIVE ME AN OFFER??? ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, YOU THREATEN MY POTENTIAL FUTURE EMPLOYERS BY SAYING YOU WILL MATCH ANY OFFER IN AN ATTEMPT TO LOWBALL ME IN A CONTRACT THAT ISN’T WORH MY ACTUAL VALUE??? I WAS WILLING TO WORK IT OUT, I DIDN’T EVEN WANT THAT MUCH. I MEAN I’M ALREADY A MILLIONARE.”

I knoew I wouldn’t want to work for a company that did that to me. You can’t even talk to the boss candidly because he doesn’t give a damn about you…..that would suck. Personally, I would find a new job and quit…and that’s exactly what Joe did.

Billy Knight was one of the only GM’s around the leauge with the balls to offer JJ a fair contract, I don’t even think the suns would havematched it personally.

Sund treated Josh and Smoove the same way. Smooove just has high character and stuck with it because he loves his city, besides, unlike Chills, he was given an offer bforehand, and just choose to find a better one. Luckily smoove didn’t break his face or anything like that last season lol. Or we would’ve had anotehr JJ situation on our hands.

Ariose

June 7th, 2009
7:35 pm

If we just put some better weapons around JJ, he’ll get that single coverage that he loves so much. What did JJ do the last time he got single coverage for the whole season? I think he put up 25ppg if i’m not mistaken.

Waht did JJ do the last time he got single-coverage for a full 48 minutes? I beleive he dropped 41 points on the Bulls…..i’m just sayin’

Kobe got single coverage the other night against Mickael Pietrus and the Magic…..didn’t work out so well for the Magic did it?

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
7:41 pm

“I think JJ left Phoenix because he didn’t see himself as a fourth option on offense and thought he could play a bigger role on a winning team than he could if he took lower pay to stay in Phoenix (and four years out, whaddya know – JJ was scoring 21ppg and was the only member of that Suns starting 5 that was still playing in May).”

Who are we gonna believe, nire or Joe’s lying words? heh heh

Damn, nire, you didn’t even FEEL the hook on THAT one! ;-)

Also: if you said this: “I gotta laugh at anyone who puts up stats as the measure of what a player brings to the table. Come on.”

Then why even reference this: ” Look at the next 4 above the 5 you misleadingly* (see below) placed alongside JJ. Arenas, Ben Wallace, Odom, and Zach Randolph. Why don’t you put up THEIR numbers and compare? Oh, sorry, that would show how foolish this “production and pay” reasoning is”????

I guess you laughed at yourself as you typed, eh?

If “production vs. pay is SO unimportant, then why do you say that Horford should be untrade-able in your eyes because of the production we get from him on a rookie contract (which I’ve agreed with on several occasions)?

If production vs. pay is SO unimportant, then why were you ALL OVER Josh Smith for signing a new contract and having his numbers drop across the board?

Wouldn’t be that thinly disguised disdain now, would it?

I’ll say this. I was NOT “cherry picking” stats to bolster an argument. I got curious as to how JJ measured up against others at his pay, so I chose the nearest 5 salaries. Totally arbitrary and I certainly didn’t have the time it would take to do a true statistical analysis. I was VERY surprised to see who the nearest 5 were, because I just don’t keep up with that stuff. Of COURSE there are worse cases, and if any of THOSE had been in the 5 nearest salaries, I would have included them as well. As it was, I inadvertently left off Lamar Odum.

Yes, it’s a snapshot of this year only. But it was what I had and I found it informative. You don’t have to.

I just hope Rick Sund looks at the production aspect (and it’s his JOB to do so) before offering an extension.

Astro Joe

June 7th, 2009
8:08 pm

Sautee, you’re right, it is Sund’s job to base Joe’s next contract based on the market value of his production. That is nothing new. If there are 20 guys making max salaries, why compare Joe to a handful? Why not use the netire set of 20?

And surprisingly, where I work, they compare production across comparable universes of managers. A CIO or HR guy is not typically compared against the Marketing or Sales guy. It’s usually Marketing against comparable disciplines. If the NBA were comparable (and it is), Joe would be compared against other wings as opposed to bigs or PGs. (Since we know that Dampier is FAR overpayed relative to his teammate, Josh Howard but relatively on par with other big men).

I agree that last season, Joe did not earn a “max status” contract. And thus, he will not likely sign a reduced extension, not when he can use the next 80+ games to improve his regular season and post-season (if we make it there) performance. I’d venture a guess that Bosh is in a very similar situation, except he didn’t lead his team to the post-season. Sund is on record as having said “having a guy on the last year of his contract isn’t a bad thing”. If Joe wants another max deal (when he will be competing with Wade, LeBron, Kobe and possibly Amare), then let’s reap the benefits of having him try to earn one in a Hawks uniform.

G-Man

June 7th, 2009
8:10 pm

Sautee, thanks,

After researching, I found martin avg. 2.86 TO this season
Joe avg. 2.47 TO this season.
However,
Career avg. Martin has 1.67 to joe’s 2.23 TO

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
8:22 pm

Sautee,

Alright, I lied. All I’ll say is this: I listed all those guys to prove how misleading it is to just look at people’s salaries out of context in determining whether they are overpaid. I was not advocating it as a valid method of reasoning, as my asterisk footnote at the bottom made pretty clear. I don’t believe ANY salary-based reasoning is a good way to compare players. Because while some people might think that Rashard Lewis is “overpaid” for what he brings if they just looked at salary and production, the Magic are looking pretty damned smart for signing him right now. I would take JJ over Rashard. But I also don’t think Rashard is “overpaid.” You have to look at way more than just salary and production to determine a player’s worth.

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
8:23 pm

And NOW I’m done.

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
8:40 pm

Did anyone else notice how Anthony Johnson chose to standoff from the Magic huddles during timeouts… I can’t blame him, I think its a bad decision by Van Gundy to rush Jameer back into the playing rotation.

Aaron

June 7th, 2009
8:41 pm

Sekou,

I meant to point this out on your last article, but I forgot:

The Hawks don’t have Bird rights on Flip Murray, so even if they sign him as cheaply as they signed Mo Evans ($2.5M/per), then they’ll have to use part of their Mid-Level Exception.

Doing so would leave them no more than $3.5M to sign another team’s FA (I’m being pretty liberal with that total, too). In other words, it’s EITHER Flip or Charlie V, but not both.

Big Ray

June 7th, 2009
8:57 pm

“I gotta laugh at anyone who puts up stats as the measure of what a player brings to the table. Come on.”

Hee hee…hee hee hee…hee hee hee hee….bwaaaa ha ha ha hah ha ha haha haaaaaaaaaa! *breaths in*….bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa! Oh, I’m gonna crack a rib! If we manage to avoid that, Sekou’s blogs won’t get more than 100 posts per blog. And most of us won’t have anything to say besides what Clyde usually does: one-liners.

But I DID need that laugh.

JerryWest

June 7th, 2009
9:08 pm

[quote name='DrReality' date='Jun 6 2009, 08:13 PM' post='387850']
When I was in Turkey I played in one city, same team for six years…

…At 25 and six years into your NBA career… [/quote]

Zaza was at most 13 when he started his pro career. Did he play in any other place? He must have played in some local league before a Turkish club picked him up.

Zaza was the on hiw way to become Wilt/Shaq as a in his pre-teen. What happened?

niremetal

June 7th, 2009
9:20 pm

Melvin,

Agreed. Why would he risk disrupting the flow of a team that had been playing championship-level ball for the last few weeks?

Mike is back

June 7th, 2009
9:30 pm

Stewart Scoot makes u sick on stomach the way he over-hype every stat that he reads…u would think that this cat never sat feet on the asphalt, hardwood, foot ball field, whatever!!!

I probably eat crow on this one…but I’m calling a win for the Magic to nite!!!!!

If I’m Vangondy I would have stayed the course and kept Nelson inactive…we will see how this all turns out.

I want waste my time with the refs.

O'brien

June 7th, 2009
9:36 pm

nire, you said “I think JJ left Phoenix because he didn’t see himself as a fourth option on offense and thought he could play a bigger role on a winning team than he could if he took lower pay to stay in Phoenix (and four years out, whaddya know – JJ was scoring 21ppg and was the only member of that Suns starting 5 that was still playing in May)”.

So JJ left to come to team coming off a 13 win season? The Hawks were so far from a winning team, that it was in JJ’s 4th season when we had a winning record. So I disagree with your reasoning. Why would JJ leave a winning team like Phoenix, playing with Nash and those guys, to come to ATL, coming off a 13 win season, where there was no star, and a no name head coach? I think part of why JJ left Phoenix is because he felt disrespected. If I’m not mistaken, JJ was willing to sign a contract extension with Phoenix prior to his last season with them. But the GM and owner decided to make him wait, and at the end of the season, they didnt offer him what he felt like he was worth. Sure, he wanted to resurrect the Hawks, but a big part of his reason for signing is he felt disrespected by the Suns (and he’s from Arkansas, so this was closer to home).

Chills felt disrespected too, because he heard that signing him and Josh would be the Hawks priority, but yet Sund told him to go find an offer, and Sekou said Rick Sund talked a salary range with Chills, but they never made him an offer. Chills said there were winning teams who wanted him, but the Hawks didn’t like their offers. And I believe Chills. He waited for the hawks to make a contract offer, and they never did. And the were’nt going to do the sign and trade (which is understandable), but by the time they made an offer, Chills had already felt disrespected.

Mike is back

June 7th, 2009
9:41 pm

Put the College of Charleston in the dam game!!!

Mike is back

June 7th, 2009
9:42 pm

AKA Anthony Johnson…save Jameer for next season!!!!

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
9:43 pm

At what point will Rafer drive the ball to the basket??? And some complain about Josh jacking up jumpshots… My goodness….

Najeh Davenpoop

June 7th, 2009
10:03 pm

I can’t stand watching this Magic team… people can diss LeBron all they want, but I still think the Cavs are a better team and would have made this a much more interesting finals. This is an ugly game.

Big Ray

June 7th, 2009
10:06 pm

Najeh,

Stop Magic-hatin’. ;)

O’brien,

The perspective on disrespect appears to be a matter or convenience, eh? ;) Stirrin’ the pot…stirrin’ the pot…

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:13 pm

When Dwight Howard learn how to spin left and finished with the left hand, he will be unstoppable…

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
10:18 pm

Nire,

about this: “I don’t believe ANY salary-based reasoning is a good way to compare players.”

ok, so that’s what you think. BUT………

When you were posting to Melvin a couple of days ago you said “The league is littered with overpaid and/or mediocre PGs (Beno Udrih, Luke Ridnour, Daniel Gibson, Jamaal Tinsley…Speedy…), ”

So exactly what method did you use to make that “overpaid” assertion? hmmmmm………

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:22 pm

I guess Van Gundy has lost faith in Rafer (can’t argue with that) as he going with Reddick in the backcourt.

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:26 pm

3 questionable calls on Orlando in a row…

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:28 pm

I’ll repeat:

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:13 pm
When Dwight Howard learn how to spin left and finished with the left hand, he will be unstoppable…

Najeh Davenpoop

June 7th, 2009
10:28 pm

I didn’t see the atrocity that was Game 1, but this game has had the works — awful officiating, way too many 3-pointers taken, inconsistent-at-best ball movement, and stupid mistakes by both teams. The Magic in particular run one of the most hideous offenses I’ve ever seen — stand around and jack up jumpshots and hope your dominant big man rebounds the misses. The fact that it’s actually working for them only shows how eager the Lakers have been to shoot themselves in the foot in this game. With their talent, every game the Lakers play in this series should be a 25-point blowout.

Last year’s Celtics or the Parker-Ginobili-Duncan Spurs in their prime would have CRUSHED both of these teams. After a great playoffs, this is shaping up to be a really horrible NBA Finals. Sorry for being a hater, but I’m calling it as I see it. I’d rather see iso-Bron all game than this travashamockery.

Najeh Davenpoop

June 7th, 2009
10:29 pm

I agree with Melvin though… Dwight Howard is the one player on the Magic I like, and he’s only a post move or two away from becoming unstoppable.

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:31 pm

Najeh,

If you’re going to say that then I would like to raise the issue that I wish KG wouldn’t have gotten hurt b/c it would be the Celtics in the finals and KG would’ve punk Gasol, Bynum and Odom. And Paul P. would have own Ariza…

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:34 pm

Hedo or Hero….

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:36 pm

Najeh,

Just read your 10:28 post, agreed…

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:39 pm

Lakers got away with alot contact on defense during that possession. I hope the game don’t end on a touch foul by the Magic…

Melvin

June 7th, 2009
10:39 pm

Hedo or Hero…

O'brien

June 7th, 2009
10:56 pm

so JJ Reddick is getting big minutes in the NBA finals? Courtney Lee gets a play called for him with a chance to win? So that’s what it feels like when a coach has confidence in his players, (not just the star players).

Sautee

June 7th, 2009
10:57 pm

O’Brien,

So we don’t have that? ;-)

The Truth

June 8th, 2009
12:11 am

Orlando Magic Coach, Stan Van Gundy coached his azz off (in game 2) and they still loss because his players did not execute. He made some nice adjustments but these Magic Players have shown (so far), that they are not really ready for prime time. They are playing with no swagger and as if they are star struck about the moment. They are playing with no real believe that they are going to win the series. They are looking more like a Cinderella story instead of the Eastern Conference Champion they represent. They remind me of our Hawks when they beat Miami in the first round. In round two, they laid an egg because their goals had been met.

Big Ray

June 8th, 2009
12:34 am

Najeh,

I was just kidding with you. I know you wanted the Cavs to win.

The Truth,

Wow. You’re right, though.

niremetal

June 8th, 2009
12:46 am

I can’t say I agree with that assessment. The Magic looked no more “star struck” than the Lakers did tonight. Hedo made one of the most impressive defensive plays I’ve ever seen by funneling the most dangerous off-the-dribble player in recent NBA history into the heart of the Magic defense and then blocking his shot from behind. Rashard Lewis turned in a hell of a game. Dwight Howard did too – grabbing 16 rebounds over Bynum/Odom/Gasol takes more than just athleticism. The rest of the team was just plain awful on offense, but they harassed the Lakers all night on the other end.

I would agree if this we were talking about Game 1, but tonight I did not see a star struck team. I see a team that busted its butt and came up short on the road against the team that’s been favored to win the Finals pretty much all year. And Van Gundy did call a great game (although I STILL don’t get why Nelson is playing so much so quickly…they seem to stall whenever he’s on the floor), and his players did fail to execute all too often (on offense at least). But that happens sometimes. Even Malone and Stockton occasionally messed up the pick-and-roll. I bet that they’ll have their swagger back at 100% once they get back home.

Ye of Little Faith

June 8th, 2009
3:37 am

Get Josh Smith’s twin Charlie Villanueva.
Draft ANOTHER point guard after failing to develop the last one.
Fail to resign Zaza and Flip.

Do these three things and you are certain to lose this fan.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 8th, 2009
10:07 am

Jeez -Nobody ever said Butler was a better player than JJ…….. When the guy plays he puts up numbers -20 a game which is right at what JJ avg’s…….. Okay If not Mcgee then Heyward….

Caron wouldnt be an upgrade over JJ but -Caron,Heyward,#5(Evans/Curry) certainly would be. All this man love for JJ is turning my stomach-the guy is a good not great player…… Hell the man was MIA for atleast 4 months of the season…….. 11 points a game in the playoffs -Just say’n the stats dont lie.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 8th, 2009
10:22 am

Good 12:01 post Sautee……… Thats basicly where i wuz going….. Good player but not Max Money type……

! JJ- “Im a jump shooter, and i almost never get to the rim when i drive. Also i dont like contact,but I do luv to pound that ball. Hey theirs 3 seconds on theshot clock i better pass to Josh”

Little early morning humor……

The Truth

June 8th, 2009
10:45 am

niremetal

What game were you waiting? Stan Van Gundy certainly wasn’t pleased. In his postgame interview, he wondered how the game made it to OT:

Orlando Turnovers = 20
Guards Shooting % = 6-26
Team Shooting % = <42%

Courtney Lee missed a game winning layup

Ariose

June 8th, 2009
10:51 am

LOL @ I.MUS

But, you know JJ absorbs contact like a sponge and never gets the call….

I mean if y’all want to trade JJ for those other players fine. Tell Sund, maybe the move won’t set the franchise back another ten years……anything is possible.

The Truth

June 8th, 2009
10:52 am

niremetal

Question Correction:

What game were you watching? :)

bigdave

June 8th, 2009
12:08 pm

you guys are loosing it talking about any deal for Caron involving Joe… haha… wow… and start another rebuilding process… Caron is nowhere near the player of Joe Johnson…

Joe is the 3rd best SG in the league… he should be a Hawk as long as he wants to play here…

bigdave

June 8th, 2009
12:09 pm

correction: “losing it”

niremetal

June 8th, 2009
12:10 pm

The Truth,

Read my post, man. I admitted that the non-Big Three players were awful on offense and didn’t execute well. But you can’t tell me that they harassed the Lakers on D. Lee’s missed layup was not exactly an easy shot…it was from behind the backboard while falling out of bounds. Come on, man.

niremetal

June 8th, 2009
12:10 pm

*That they didn’t harrass the Lakers on D. Heh.

jhan

June 8th, 2009
12:25 pm

Why would you even consider trading a 3-time all star for a broken down SF, unproven center & a pick. Lunacy!

I would trade Marvin & our #19 pick for those guys. Not a proven commodity like JJ.

I like the fact the Jackson & Van Gundy have made changes to their offense & defense for this series. Both, especially Phil, have stated over & over again that their bench players will determine the outcome. Nice to know some coaches realize that bench utilization is key.

cp

June 8th, 2009
12:40 pm

Joe is the 3rd best sg in the league? Huh since when?

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 8th, 2009
1:10 pm

Come on big dave -you cant believe that……. JJ the 3rd best sg in the league….. Heres 3 to start with-Wade,Kobe,Ginobilli

I totaly forgot Devin harris was a free agent. He would be a nice pg for us …i’d rather have him than -Sessions,jack,Ridnour-uuuuugh etc….
Then again in our offense he would morph into a stand still jump shooter and not the one man fast break that he truly is. Yeah dump bibby and offer Harris 10 mill a year

Sautee

June 8th, 2009
1:42 pm

Niremetal,

You must have thought this question was rhetorical. It wasn’t, so I’ll post again:

Nire,

about this: “I don’t believe ANY salary-based reasoning is a good way to compare players.”

ok, so that’s what you think. BUT………

When you were posting to Melvin a couple of days ago you said “The league is littered with overpaid and/or mediocre PGs (Beno Udrih, Luke Ridnour, Daniel Gibson, Jamaal Tinsley…Speedy…), ”

So exactly what method did you use to make that “overpaid” assertion? hmmmmm………

Melvin

June 8th, 2009
2:16 pm

IMUS,
I agree Kobe and D.Wade are 1 & 2 but I’m not sure if Ginobilli is better than Joe. I think Joe would put up better number than him if he played alongside Duncan and Parker….
Also, its been awhile since you went undercover to get some Hawks inside info….

Nire,
I thought that was a tough shot that Lee took at the end of the game as well, especially with Kobe pulling his jersey prior to him jumping for the alley oop….

Sautee

June 8th, 2009
2:38 pm

Jhan,

Good point about the benches. Phil went 12 deep in Game 1 and 10 deep in Game 2. VanG went 10 deep in both games and called a play for his #5 option for the crucial play of Game 2.

What about that MYTH that coaches shorten their rotations as the stakes get higher?

I guess that goes for coaches with NO self-confidence. And no faith in their second tier players.

dap01

June 8th, 2009
2:41 pm

Do you think Woodson would have drawn up a play other than to say “shoot a 35 footer” to JJ?

Great call by Van Gundy.

Sautee

June 8th, 2009
2:44 pm

Melvin, and Nire,

about Lee’s “tough shot”…..

I think he made it harder than it had to be by outrunning the pass. He did a poor job of adjusting to the ball in flight. Had he slowed down JUST A BIT, he’d have had a bunny. Plus, he might have drawn contact from Gasol and gotten a foul called.

Astro Joe

June 8th, 2009
2:56 pm

Phil has 5 players with 38+ minutes in the OT game and he gets applauded for utilizing his bench? SVG shows “confidence” in running a play for a starter who only received 12 minutes of playing time in a game with 53 minutes?

Spin doctors are most definitely in the house today.

Had that been Woody on either bench, we would have heard…

“Why is he playing 5 guys for 38+ minutes or 4 guys for more than 40 in this game… doesn’t he realize that he can’t do that in the 100th game of the season for these players?”

Or, “why would he run a play for a guy who only took 2 shots previous to the last second shot? That makes no sense, he obviously has no clue how to run an offense if he thinks that anyone can just make a pressure-filled shot like that”.

Sheesh!

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 8th, 2009
3:17 pm

Melvin…. Whats Up, “Ahhhh yes watch them as they file in one by one, as the NBA finals turn into long boring months of Baseball -Sekou’s blog is the only refuge for the Basketball Junkie,Arm Chair GM’s and Subject Matter Experts”

You may be right about JJ vs Ginobilli – I guess im just getting tired of the JJ show -I will pass on anything I find out -itz going to be a long summer

Melvin

June 8th, 2009
3:34 pm

Sautee,

I’m not going to criticize a guy who’s attemping to finish a difficult alley oop play with less than a second on the clock. Would it been a different outcome had the Refs call Kobe for holding his jersey? Go back and look at the play again. Kobe held Lee so bad on that play until he pull his jersey out of his shorts. Maybe that’s what thru Lee timing off preventing him from catching the ball in a better position to finish the play…

Hoops

June 8th, 2009
3:47 pm

Niremental,

After July 1 the Hawks will be roughly 18M under the cap. My understanding is that they can go over the cap to resign their own FA’s. If this is true, then any trades that they plan on doing should be done before Flip, Bibby, or Zaza are resigned if they are planning on resigning either of these players. Correct?

Ariose

June 8th, 2009
4:00 pm

Melvin, I agree. Kobe got away with that one….

Ariose

June 8th, 2009
4:05 pm

“Australian Patrick Mills was absolutely the star of the evening’s all-star game, posting an impressive 30 point performance on 8/18 shooting from the field and 12/13 from the line. Mills handled the ball on a string all game long, showing terrific quickness keeping his man off balance, and making an absolute living in the mid-range area with his deadly pull-up jumper. His ability to utilize strong hesitation moves makes him extremely difficult to stay in front of, and he did a good job not settling for tough shots from beyond the arc today, getting to the line repeatedly. He clearly thrives in up-tempo settings such as the one seen in today’s all-star game, which came in stark contrast to his morning performance, where he seemed to over-dribble somewhat while trying to create in the half-court.”

Link:

http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Reebok-Eurocamp-Day-Two-3251/

Ken Strickland

June 8th, 2009
4:19 pm

Trade PF JSmith to Philly for C SDalembert, and a and 2nd rd pick. In 24.8mins Dalembert averaged 8.5 RPG, 1.78 BPG and 6.04PPG while in 35.1mins JSmith averaged 7.2RPG, 1.60BPG and 15.6PPG. Then we use those Picks and expiring contracts to trade for PG KHinrick. Remember, in the 07-08 season, SDalembert played 33.1mins and averaged a double double, 10.4RPG, 2.34BPG and 10.5PPG.

That would leave us with a starting lineup of:

PG-KHinrick
SG-JJohnson
SF-MWilliams
PF-AHorford
C–SDalembert
BENCH
SF/SG-JChildress
PG—-ALaw
SG/PG-FMurray
PF—-OHunter
C/PF–SJones
C/PF–ZPachulia or FA
SF/SG-MEvans

This would be a strong starting lineup defensively, at all positions, and very strong rebounding wise. It would also meet the Woody factor, which is a lot more important than some of you seem to think. Although this lineup would lose some scoring with the loss of MBibby and JSmith, it would more than make it up DEF by reducing the PPG allowed.

Melvin

June 8th, 2009
4:31 pm

Ken,

It been reported that Philly couldn’t give Dalembert away. Now you propose we trade him for our leader in points, rebs, and steals during the playoffs???

kwooden1

June 8th, 2009
4:31 pm

Ken you forgot about E. Brand, Philly has a lot of money tied up in him.

Astro Joe

June 8th, 2009
4:42 pm

If Dalembert does get traded, he will likely have a very, very good season. I think he has a massive chip on his shoulders. If nothing else, dude will likely have 10 blocks everytime he plays Philly. He’ll probably end up with the Spurs and everyone will talk about how they resurrected his career. Teams like the Spurs always seem to know the right time to acquire a player (see Roger Mason).

glw

June 8th, 2009
4:47 pm

Hoops,

I will try to answer your question of Niremetal, you can make trades as long as the salaries are relatively close, not sure what the %…. maybe 125% plus 100,000 or something like that, as long as you have cap space, you can trade no matter if salaries match or not. Technically the Hawks are over to cap. so to do that, I think the Hawks would have to renounce rights to free agents to clear space to compensate for the difference in the salary that they received. For instance, if the Hawks traded Josh Smith who makes a little over 10 million, if the Hawks wanted to take back a player that made 15 million, they would have to clear cap space by renouncing players and getting under the cap by say roughly 3 million or so, to be within the ratio of 125%.

Ken Strickland,

I am a big Josh Smith fan, but I know its a business and am all for making the team better. Sure a move like that would make us bigger, and I can see a reason for justifying the Hawks making such a move, but why would Philly want to make that deal? Are you telling me they are willing to trade their one and only true center for Josh? They already owe big money to Elton Brand who plays the same position as Josh, so I dont see that deal happening.

newkid

June 8th, 2009
5:00 pm

Message to Mr. Sund. While not your doing, here’s a sampling of what we the fans have to stomach as we look back at some of the Hawks’ draft decisions over the past recent years (no, I’m not going to mention Marvin Williams again). We selected Salim when we could have selected Brandon Bass, Ronny Turiaf, Monta Ellis, Lou Williams, Amir Johnson, Marcin Gortat, Andray Blatche, or Von Wafer; we selected Shelden Williams when we could have selected Brandon Roy, Rudy Gay, Ronnie Brewer, Jordan Farmar, Sergio Rodriguez, or Rajon Rondo; we selected AC Law when we could have selected Thad Young, Al Thornton, Rodney Stuckey, Rudy Fernandez, Aaron Brooks, or Daequan Cook. Mr. Sund, DON’T SCREW UP.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 8th, 2009
5:04 pm

Melvin -i wuz thinking the same thing, If we were to trade Josh to Philli….. Thad young better be apart of the package

bigdave

June 8th, 2009
5:45 pm

YES AND I REPEAT… JOE JOHNSON IS THE 3rd BEST 2 GUARD IN THE NBA…!

bigdave

June 8th, 2009
5:50 pm

please… Manu “Im Going Left Every Time ” Ginobili … give me a break…

he’ll be hard pressed finding that game again on that iffy left ankle…

Joe Johnson sir… BUILD AROUND THIS GUY..

ILL-logical

June 8th, 2009
6:08 pm

Two quick comments about last night’s game: 1) JVK outcoached Big Chief Triangle last night and 2) no matter how the serise unfolds, the Lakers are an awesome collection of talent.They can bring height,heft,speed,experience and of course talent in a variety of packages and they are not an old team outside of Derrick Fisher.

What can the Hawks do to be competitive with the likes of LA ,Orlando or Cleveland? Keep as much of their primary asset-chemistry- together. We may end up with the dystopian fantasy of Mr. Sund and Woodson,ie the 2009-10 version of the 2004 Pistons but let it be with as much of the current roster as feasible.
But we might end up with Flip being Chauncy(it will cost a little more but not as much as Bibby); Marvin as Rip ; Josh as Tayshun; Al as the good “Sheed(few 3’s ,more D)and a stronger Solo as Ben wallace. With Acie; Othello Hunter and a FA frontcourt player rounding out the roster.

Not pretty but it may be all we can afford both in terms of $ and the fact that what FA or for that matter assistants would want to step into this situation where the coach/gm are on a one year deal?

niremetal

June 8th, 2009
6:09 pm

Sautee,

No time to argue, man. You’re taking my words out of context and I’m sick of this back-and-forth BS where you go find a post I made a few days ago, seize on one word, and then try to show me up for it. Too much to do to deal with this. I never said a player never could be “overpaid.” I said that pay vs. production reasoning doesn’t tell the whole the story unless you look at the broader picture, and taking the player’s pay and production as a snapshot out of context of the NBA salary structure makes no sense. Sometimes I said “pay vs. production” reasoning or something to that effect as shorthand because otherwise my posts would be 2534534 words long.

If you want to pick apart a single word or set up straw men with my arguments, be my guest. But my patience is up. I don’t have time for this BS anymore. Engage my arguments. Don’t make caricatures of them and then expect me to respond.

But seriously.

Big Ray

June 8th, 2009
6:50 pm

Astro Joe,

Yes, spin doctors indeed, lol! Well thanks for spinning the record back around in the other direction, the music had stalled for a moment, and we were beginning to think it was a theme in variations (without the variations), instead of a waltz. You know, kind of like Woody’s offense.

True, we just saw coaches doing something that we’ve yelled at Woody about for a long time. Tell ya what, let’s compare notes again when the following have come to pass:

1)Woody is coaching this time in the NBA Finals. ‘Nuff said.

2)Our team has the capability of going 9 or 10 deep EFFECTIVELY, and Woody is the coach.

3)When we’ve got a starter that the opposing team simply cannot handle (and he’s scoring with ease), Woody actually runs plays for him in the second half (instead of going away from him almost entirely and reverting back to the usual JJ/Bibby shooting competition).

4)Woody runs plays for guys who can shoot where he has them shooting, instead of guys who can’t shoot from that spot (and then yelling at them for doing what he told them to do).

5)This one is so good, I just had to say it again: Woody is coaching the Hawks in the NBA Finals. If we’re playing in the NBA Finals with Woody as the coach, a little criticism still applies to any and all who are performing, but I can’t see anybody having a right to say much negative about him AT ALL.

Sound hypocritical? Okay. Sound spin-doctorish? I can go for that. Hey, if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. And that’s what you just did, lol! ;)

The Truth

June 8th, 2009
6:52 pm

Niremetal
Yes there were some improvements to the Magic’s defense relative to the 1st game which I acknowledged favorably via coaching adjustments. This is perhaps our common ground. But overall taking both games into account, I have to side with Stan Van Gundy about his team performance as I indicated. Regarding Lee’s missed shot; it is what it is, he missed. In the grandest of stage as the NBA finals, those are the plays that separate the champions from the pretenders. Yes you argue that it was a difficult shot but it was certainly doable. But the bottom line is that he missed and they lost and now down 0-2. However, I do marvel at the coach for drawing that play up. I wish Woody had that kind of coaching IQ. If he was in that situation, we all know what play he would have called: ISO JOE WITH 3 DEFENDERS ON HIM. No element of surprise. We would have gotten what we expected, THE SAME OLD, SAME OLD.

O'brien

June 8th, 2009
7:35 pm

Good point Ray. If Woody gets the Hawks to the NBA finals, then a lot of us will cut him some slack, because he will have earned it.

Because the Hawks may not have enough salary cap space, I agree that they should try and sign other team’s free agents before signing ours. Sign Charlie V or Brandon Bass before resigning Zaza. And sign a PG not named Bibby (I say Jarrett Jack, but I’m okay with Sessions too). T

Ken Strickland

June 8th, 2009
7:39 pm

MELVIN-I didn’t specify when the trade should take place. If we can make it happen during the playoffs, then let it happen.

KWOODEN-I didn’t forget EBrand. What I forgot was ZPachulia. I had in my mind a sign and trade with he and JSmith, since he wants another chance to start again. What we get in return, in addition to Dalembert, would be negotiable.

GLW-Like I said to KWOODEN, I forgot to include ZPachulia in the mix. Also, wtih the extreme chemistry issues EBrand created for Philly, they might want to reconsider their decision to take him over Josh. Another chance to get Josh might make them consider sending EBrand packing. This team will never get to the next level as long as the SAASG keeps forcing HC MWoodson to use players drafted by former GM BKnight, that don’t fit his OFF/DEF system. Since the SAASG has obviously provided Woodson with unwavering support, they owe it to him to get the type of players that meet with his approval and fits his OFF/DEF systems.

I believe the lineup I persented will meet with Woodson’s approval and do a better job of excuting his flawed OFF/DEF systems. I don’t dislike his approach to being a HC enough to want him to fail, because that would mean the team also fails. If we can get to the next level with him as HC, I’d be happy.

Melvin

June 8th, 2009
7:45 pm

Look at what Marty Blake (Mr.NBA Scout himself) had to say about Acie…

“With point guards it’s especially hard,” says Blake. “A lot of times they’re not playing point guard in high school or college, they’re playing the two. If they go to a quality college and see Division I talent every night, they have a better shot at making it in the NBA. But sometimes, even with a senior it’s hard to tell about the point position. I liked Acie Law quite a bit, but for whatever reason – he’s had injuries and so forth – he hasn’t made it. It will be interesting to see what the Hawks do with their pick. They’ve got two years invested in Law, so maybe they give him one more. He hasn’t had a great deal of gametime experience, and you have to have that experience to gain confidence and be effective.”

glw

June 8th, 2009
8:10 pm

Ken Strickland,

Well that deal does make more sense, but I still doubt Philly goes for it. But I agree with you, I was shocked when they threw money at Brand. I think he does mess up their chemistry and Josh Smith would have been a better fit for them, oh well, thats their loss.

I agree with you and “Woody’s flawed system, Woodson reminds me of an old school coach set in his ways and the best solution is probably finding players that are adapt at his system. For Woodys system to work aka known as the “Joe and Bibby Show”, his best bet is to surround them with shooters. Under that theory, its best to add a frontcourt player that can shoot, either a Rasheed Wallace/Charlie V type. And a 2nd post players must be developed, Sheed has an inside out game, but like has previously been discussed he might be out of the price range. Barring a trade, the next best alternative is to hope that Horford or Smoove develop a low post game, not sure I see that happening as fast as we would like.

Astro Joe

June 8th, 2009
8:39 pm

Ray, if your point is that coaches in the NBA Finals are better than coaches not in the NBA Finals, I agree. But that would eliminate maybe 500 posts here, now wouldn;t it? And of course, the logic doesn;t work the same way for some. Is Woody a better coach than LB? Or D’Antoni? How about those coaches who failed to make it in the second round, like MacMillan?

Hey, I’m all for saying that the most recent performance is the deciding factor. And I am comfortable with Woody being one of the 8 top coaches in the league this year. I’m all on board. No debate here.

Ariose

June 8th, 2009
8:45 pm

Draft Hansbrough, Sign Sheed, Sign Green, Sign Anthony Parker, Trade speedy+Cash+Randolph(if necessary) to move up higher for our second draft Pick and Draft Pactick Mills. Resign Bibby/Flip(3 year contract….). Also If you can’t get Sheed, the sign Brandon Bass and trader one of our Bigs later for a Bigger Center or keep them all and pray to God that we get Lucky in the 2010 NBA Draft.

Since this is my little concoction and i’m the Imaginary GM here, finances arent’t an Issue.

Larry O’Brien contenders for sure…..yup

Sautee

June 8th, 2009
8:46 pm

Nire,

Geez, I hope THIS is in context.

First off, I WAS engaging your argument. If you can’t see that then open your eyes a little wider.

Your words: “I never said a player never could be “overpaid.” I said that pay vs. production reasoning doesn’t tell the whole the story unless you look at the broader picture, and taking the player’s pay and production as a snapshot out of context of the NBA salary structure makes no sense. Sometimes I said “pay vs. production” reasoning or something to that effect as shorthand because otherwise my posts would be 2534534 words long.”

Nire, never did I ever accuse you of saying “one could never be overpaid“. Go back and read my post. What I asked is how you came to ascertain “overpaid” as a value in any particular player, in light of your statement that “I don’t believe ANY salary-based reasoning is a good way to compare players.”

You act like I really didn’t care, but only wanted to play “gotcha”. You’re DEAD WRONG, about that Matt. DEAD WRONG. Like Ray, I push you to get a good argument. But to act like I’m not really interested in your reply, except to belittle you misses the ENTIRE point. And is insulting, as well.

I thought that I was asking a valid question, given that your long post on pay vs. production was in the context of discussing the stats I threw out. Your “statement” went to the trouble of capitalizing the word “any” so I was left wondering how you EVER could judge whether any player merited their salary by those standards. After the diatribe you gave, I think it’s a totally valid question that would help me understand “HOW” you judge overpayment without using “salary based reasoning”. It seemed like a conundrum to me.

I also NEVER said that pay vs. production told the entire story, but you react as if I said exactly that. And you KNEW that was a straw man argument when you said it, but you turn and infer that I’m the one using straw.

Can you explain what I took out of context? Didn’t think I did, but I can be convinced.

You were obviously offended by my asking, so either I struck a nerve, or you’re just overtired and at a vulnerable place studying so many hours for the Bar exam (when is it anyway?). It was not my intent to offend. I think you mistook my “stick poking” style as an affront.

Poke with a stick, yes. (Just like Astro Joe did to me earlier today). Offend, no. At least not with any intent. What was that term you used, mens rea?

But don’t run away when we have good stuff to discuss.

Ariose

June 8th, 2009
8:46 pm

Also, then Give Woody until the All-Star break. If he STILL sucks at coaching, then fire him and bring in the Litte General pronto.

Ariose

June 8th, 2009
8:48 pm

Sign and Trade our right to Chills, Andersen, and Ankyol…..we’re never gonne see these guys in a Hawks uniform so we might as well trade em.

Astro Joe

June 8th, 2009
9:04 pm

newkid, sounds like you believe in the best player available approach to the draft, regardless of position need.

Ariose, why Avery Johnson? Starting with game 3 of The Finals against Miami, tell me why he would be the best of all the available coaches out there.

Melvin

June 8th, 2009
9:05 pm

I wonder if we could swing a deal to get Washington 5th pick if possible.

Ariose,
Checkout the report on your boy Patty Mills….

http://www.nbadraft.net/node/6571

niremetal

June 8th, 2009
9:56 pm

Sautee,

I admit that I probably took some bar-related frustration out on you. The exam is July 28-29, so I have a long ways to go. I guess what bugged me more is that you basically demanded a reply by re-posting your earlier question, and I didn’t appreciate being put in the position where I felt like I needed to either respond or risk looking like I was ducking a question. I know that wasn’t your attention, but that’s the position I felt it put me in.

Now for the context. The “salary-based reasoning” was supposed to be shorthand for “production-vs-salary based reasoning” or something to that effect. The “overpaid” comment was from a running conversation on why we wouldn’t be able to get Hinrich for a bag of peanuts (a part of the context that WAS important that you left out). The reason is simple – GMs are willing to pay a lot more to get quality PGs (and centers) than they are to get players at any other position on the floor.

I think that pretty much everyone will agree that there IS a point past which a player can be considered “overpaid” pretty much beyond argument. The most obvious are guys like Steve Francis, Raef LaFrentz, and Eddy Curry who pull down 10-figure salaries but don’t play a single game (in those cases, they barely have seen the floor for over two years). And a disproportionate number of those clearly overpaid players (as well as arguably overpaid players) ARE either PGs or centers, simply because the demand for their services greatly outstrips the supply. Teams are willing to roll the dice that an oft-injured player will stay healthy (like Tinsley or Curry or Speedy), or that a guy who turned in one good year (like Ike Austin) or even one good playoff game and half a good season (like Daniel Gibson) will maintain or improve, or that an underachieving player will put it all together (like Curry or Tyson Chandler), or that a borderline starter on a mediocre team will make the leap to solid starter on a good team (like LaFrentz or Ridnour) when that player is a big man or a point guard, or that a player clearly on the downswing of his career will maintain his production (Rod Strickland is the example I can think of, although I’m sure there are more recent ones).

That was all reasoning to support a broader, in-context point – that we shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking that we will be the only one interested in the services of Hinrich. I guarantee that some team will be willing to pony up more appealing assets for Hinrich than the expiring contracts of two players who would probably never see the floor for Chicago. The mere fact that he’s a serviceable point guard means that there will probably be a few teams willing to overlook his price tag and less-than-All-Star pedigree and give up significant assets to get him there, hoping that he’ll become the next Steve Nash.

niremetal

June 8th, 2009
9:59 pm

And now I do have to run away…the work has backed up on me like you wouldn’t believe.

BraveFan73

June 8th, 2009
10:05 pm

The Hawks have plenty of issues to address. We have to decide if our future is tied to Mike Bibby. My vote is to push to sign a point guard (perhaps a couple of PGs) first and foremost. Of course, we must resign Zaza Pachulia. That is obvious. I believe that it is going to be much more challenging than we all think.

I hear that Jarrett Jack is an unrestricted free agent. If that is the case, we must make a play for him. He brings a toughness that our team really lacks. If we were able to snag Jack, we have a guy who can play both guard positions and gives us depth. You mentioned Marvin Williams and Sheldon Williams as Billy Knight busts. How about Mr. Bust, Acie Law. I know that there were some AJC cheerleaders in his corner. This guy is not 11th pick material. Period!

Another talented PG on the board is Ramon Sessions, who was amazing for the Bucks during the second half of the season. If we are in a position to get Sessions and Jack, we can move on without Bibby, especially if we can solidify Flip Saunders. That would give us Jack (combo guard), Saunders (combo guard), and Sessions (point guard) in the backcourt with Joe Johnson.

I would also take Andre Miller or Jason Kidd at PG with Joe Johnson.

As for posts, I would be giddy for Charlie Villanueva. I would also be giddy Atlanta became aggressors and jumped into the Al Jeffereson-Stakes. Jefferson was one of the top 3 or 4 centers in the NBA prior to his injury. He was the lynchpin in the Kevin Garnett to Boston deal with the Minnesota Timberwolves. After his injury, Kevin Love played well. Jefferson is high value. However, Minnesota may not match a deal. Who would have thought that Joe Johnson would have come to Atlanta from Phoenix? He was a restricted free agent. We need to take a long look at Jefferson.

Melvin

June 8th, 2009
10:18 pm

Bravesfan73,

Flip Saunders is coach….lmao… And AL Jefferson is not a free agent. He signed a 5 year contract with the Wolves last summer..

newkid

June 8th, 2009
10:20 pm

Joe, I’m not smart enough to have worked out a system of strongly held beliefs regarding drafting talent over need or need over talent. What I do know is despite having had numerous opportunities over the past several years, we’ve far too often failed miserably – when excellent talent was available – in building a very deep and skilled side. Was the failure because we drafted need over talent? Not sure, but I’m sure the evidence clearly indicates that we’ve screwed up (for whatever the reasons) far too often. The only other thing I’m sure of tonight is I didn’t get a single nibble on my line while tooling around on the water for the past 3 hours, but got plenty skeeter bites.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 8th, 2009
11:18 pm

We all know Sekou’s upcoming blog:

“Solomon Jones is looking ripped as hell. Has added 20 pounds of pure muscle and is ready for the Hawks to resign him.”

“Scouts are saying that Smoove is looking stronger than ever and may be the MVP next year”

“Marvin is working on his African Studies Degree and has added 30 pounds of muscle

KevinA

June 9th, 2009
12:35 am

Niremetel, your 6.32 post was one of the best I’ve seen

Ariose

June 9th, 2009
2:19 am

Melvin, that happend about two weeks ago. The one I posted just happend two days ago at the Reebok Eurocap that showcases all of the European/overseas talent trying to get drafted, and since Mills played overseas professionally, he was invited…..and he owned.

Astro Joe, Well then who do you suggest? Paul Silas? Sam Mitchell? Personally I would love for us to Hire Marc Jackson, but thats just me. Rightt now AJ has one of the highest all-time winning percentages for regular season play as a coach. I just think Sund would play it safe if he let Woody go. Besides, playing it safe is something the Hawks haven’t done a lot of in the past decade, especially around June 27th. Does sund really want to take the heat for not putting a highly qualified Coach in charge? I think he’s had enough after the Chills debacle. That was good for him lol. It let him know that his mistakes will be seen by ALL hehehehe…..

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
6:48 am

Astro Joe,

That was pretty much the premise, although I wanted to put emphasis on the idea of Woody coaching us in the Finals. Again, if he’s doing that, the only complaint you really SHOULD be hearing from detractors such as myself (yes, I can admit my issues ;) ) should be, “Hey, can somebody get me a Placker or a toothpick? I can’t get this crow out of my teeth. I’ve got so much of it stuck in here, my mouth looks like a damn feather duster.” ….hee hee hee….

And you’re right, the logic doesn’t work for all coaches, when saying that coaches in the Finals are better than those who are not. Good observation. Of course, I also realize that logic in general can be, and often is undermined by some sort of exception at some point.

Ed

June 9th, 2009
7:03 am

First the hawks can start by getting front line help and a 20plus scorer a night guy Chris Bosh, more size in the back court Anthony Parker he got some years on his legs but he is 6′7 ball handler defender. Trade Josh Smith and Acie Law and a player to be named. Reason Bosh will leave Tronto so after next season roll the dice trade for him give hime a taste of playoff with next year hawk team and and the salary he deserve. Then look at our roster Starters

PG- Anthony Parker
SG- Joe Johnson
SF- Marvin William
SF- Chris Bosh
C- AL Halford

Bench
Bibby
flip
zaza

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
9:40 am

I have seen the campaign to trade Josh for Bosh numerous times on here but I can’t understand why the Raptors would go for that deal. Reason being, Josh and A.Bargainin(misp) are both finesse players. At least Bosh, would bang in the paint and grab double digits rebounds but Bargainin/Josh front court would be too weak to defend opposing teams frontcourts in my veiw. I would think the Raps would seek more of a banger (Horford type) to play alongside Bargainin. These are just my thoughts…

Astro Joe

June 9th, 2009
9:48 am

Ray, I’m glad we agree that the logic doesn’t stand up to close scrutiny. No way is SVG a better coach than Greg Popovich.

Ariose, I tend to put my coaching candidates in categories since there are obviously different approaches to hiring a coach. In my “Brand Name” bucket, I like Doug Collins and Mike Fratello. My “Re-Tread” group has been reduced to Paul Westphal (it used to include Flip Saunders and Eddie Jordan. I don’t view Mo Cheeks, Terry Porter or Sam Mitchell as upgrades over Woody). My “Out-of-the-Box” list includes Mark Jackson and Bill Laimbeer. And finally, the assistants list has Keith Smart and Brian Shaw (it used to include Alvin Gentry).

If I had to choose, I would call Doug Collins first and then Keith Smart would get the next interview. Smart has been working alongside Don Nelson for several years and should be able to relate well with the modern player while installing a player-friendly offense that would fit with our nucleus. But Avery Johnson would likely be my 10th choice for the Hawks. No thank you.

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
10:05 am

Although I’ve made jokes about it, I’d have to lean towards the side of NOT hiring Avery Johnson. The guy is clearly abrasive (though anybody might be when coaching a head-case team like the Mavs). And I can’t prove he’s a bad coach, but I also can’t prove he’s a bonafide good one, either.

Sautee

June 9th, 2009
10:19 am

Niremetal,

I totally agree on your point about Hinrich. That was never an issue for me and forgive me if quoting a portion of that response to Melvin clouded the issue.

However…………..

“The “overpaid” comment was from a running conversation on why we wouldn’t be able to get Hinrich for a bag of peanuts (a part of the context that WAS important that you left out). The reason is simple – GMs are willing to pay a lot more to get quality PGs (and centers) than they are to get players at any other position on the floor.”

And that’s a good point too. Those 2 positions indeed cause GMs to reach.

Nire, the reason I didn’t think I was quoting you out of context is this: I was not asking you to explain WHY those players were overpaid in your eyes, but HOW you reached that conclusion if indeed you thought “ANY salary-based reasoning” was a poor way to compare players.

Nire, it’s semantics, and once again you failed to see what I was asking. There is NO WAY that any of us can come to a conclusion that a player is overpaid, underpaid, paid exactly right, etc. without using SOME part of our brains that draws on pay vs. production. We’re talking about something that takes place in the Marketplace. Even in your case of Curry or LaFrentz, there’s STILL the fact that they were paid millions (pay) and sat (production). See what I mean? You said we can all agree about that. Yes, but I was speaking of HOW we came to agree…that is…. what line of reasoning did we follow to GET to that conclusion. And to do THAT we must have used SOME form of “salary based reasoning” !!!

Got it?

“The “salary-based reasoning” was supposed to be shorthand for “production-vs-salary based reasoning” or something to that effect.”

OK, Never unclear on that one. And that was exactly how I used those terms.

I thought you made good points as it applied to the “JJ vs. the field” angle. As I said, I never thought that I was presenting a “Big Picture”,and said so off the top, but I found my efforts instructive, and I DO think awareness of the COST and REWARD of any given contract is a responsibility of management.

MannyT

June 9th, 2009
10:30 am

Ed, I think Anthony Parker is an unrestricted free agent, so you cannot trade for him. He might make an excellent guy to play PG for the Hawks as a stop gap for a year or two. He did well in that role for the Raptors this when Calderon was out.

As for matchups, you can play him with Flip and cross the D (i.e. let Flip guard the 1 and Parker guard the 2). When he plays with Joe, the size at PG at least makes it more difficult for the smaller, quicker guards to see around him in the half court…and it makes the switching D work better.

At this point, he could replace Claxton on the bench once he’s traded, but you get more use.

BWAF

O'brien

June 9th, 2009
10:35 am

Ariose, I like Patty Mills too. I saw how he played in the Olympics against the US. However, if the Hawks draft Mills, I hope they have a plan in place to move Acie. If I am Sund, I would sign Jack/Sessions to be our starter, resign Flip, and use Acie/Mills/whichever PG we draft as our 3rd PG.

Ken Strickland

June 9th, 2009
11:43 am

GLW-the more I think about it the more I realize the trade I suggested isn’t the best solution for the Hawks or Philly. The trade that would offer the best solution for both teams would be trading JSmith to Philly for EBrand. EBrand is just as good a rebounder and shot blocker as JSmith, and he’s a much much more efficient and skilled inside scorer and midrange jumpshooter.

His inside scoring effeciency would command double teams that would make JJ much more effective. JJ would actually be able to go 1 on 1 instead of 1 on 2 or 3, like in the past. EBrand would also allow us to develop an OFF indentify, since every team would know it had to stop him in the post. With he and JJ Mr inside and Mr outside, teams would have to pick their poison.

Adding PG KHinrick wouldn’t hurt us offensively and he would definitely make us much better overall defensively. Adding PF EBrand wouldn’t hurt us defensively and he would definitely make us much more effecient and better overall offensively. Hinrick and Brand would make Woodson’s limited OFF/DEF much more effective, as well as eliminate some of the problems he has as a HC. Keep in mind, Hinrink is just a suggestion, because any experienced PG that can shoot and play DEF would do.

PG-KHinrick
SG-JJohnson
SF-MWilliams
PF-EBrand
C–AHorford

BENCH
ZPachulia
JChildress
TGardner or MWest
ALaw
OHunter
FA signee or draftee

Brand’s salary is $13.8M and JSmith’s is $10M. Throw in the $2.5M and $797.6K salaries of MEvans and RMorris and all that’s left is to make it happen. With Bibby’s 15M, Speedy’s 5.76M and SJones’(I don’t see him resigning to endure more of Woodsons BS) $797.5K coming off the books, we’d have over $21M to work with after trading for EBrand. With that kind of money, we could certainly afford to get a quality PG and resign MWilliams, ZPachulia and RMurray.

Ariose

June 9th, 2009
12:00 pm

Astro Joe/Ray, I know. I’ve heard all the rumors too about him being an overbearing “Control Freak”. He’s defenetly not my first choice, But I defenetly think we have a PG problem so binginc in a Marc Jackson or some other former PG would be great.

I also think Tom Thibideau deserves some consideration. His defensive scheme is awsome. Don’t know about his offesnse though.

O’Brien, me too. I just wsnt the situation resolved. Mike Bibby is an older guard, and he certailny isn’t without his flaws. If we stick with him, it doesn’t change the fact that we still need one or two “Point Guards of the future” who CAN defend, shoot and also push the tempo.

We need to play these guys. Especially Acie. If he isn’t geting time by december then he and his Agent need to DEMEAND A TRADE in order to save face. Like what JJ Redick did a few years ago. It lets the Executives around the leauge know that you’ve still got tons of potential, you’re healthy, and you’re not being utilized and you’re NOT happy abut it. This is good because teams are ALWAYS looking to upgrade around the trade deadline,it also saves Acies Career. B/C look what happend to Salim. Hejust played his contract out and teams forgot he even existied. By demanding a trade it puts you on other teams Radar, and if forces the organization to either play you or trade you.

It worked out well for JJ. He’s getting minutes in the NBA Finals. If he hadn’t spoken up he’s STILL be at the end of the bench collecting splinters. I’m a Hawks fan first, but I can’t stand to see talented players suffer like that b/c they aren’t even given a chance. Honestly, I beleive that Acie is better than Jack/Sessions, and if we sign those guys and Woody doesn’t trust them either, we’ll be in this smae predicament this time next year.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 9th, 2009
1:01 pm

We all know Sekou’s upcoming blog:

“Solomon Jones is looking ripped as hell. Has added 20 pounds of pure muscle and is ready for the Hawks to resign him.”

“Scouts are saying that Smoove is looking stronger than ever and may be the MVP next year”

“Marvin is working on his African Studies Degree and has added 30 pounds of muscle

terrell barron

June 9th, 2009
1:04 pm

Sekou, I’m tire of looking at D Howard on the Hawks page. How bout a new blog, why dontcha?

terrell barron

June 9th, 2009
1:19 pm

Ken, if we trade Josh Smith to Philly, they’ll probably come into Philips and run our asses into the ground. And I dont if Brand is the guy that I would move Smith for. If we’re going to move him, I think we can do better, Imo. His health is also a concern of mine. I’d rather move him for a Center like Biedreins, Kaman, or Camby, to play alongside Horford, not a pf to play alongside another similar pf.

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
1:33 pm

Ariose,

Like you, I want the pg situation resolved. It’s stayed unresolved and stop-gapped for years now. The first opportunity to do something about it is in the draft. After that, it’s the bottomless pit known as free agency.

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
1:36 pm

Terrell,

I feel like a team can get away with two power forwards, as long as they play well together and can do what needs to be done. Hell, that’s what we’ve been doing with Josh and Al any damn how.

Whether or not Brand is the right guy to pair with Horford is the question. I don’t have an answer, and I could be leaning toward your point of view based solely on health problems. Otherwise, you’re looking at an all-star level PF who is a sure 20 and 10 guy. People are fine with guys like Amare Stoudamire and Chris Bosh. They’re PFs, too…

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
1:37 pm

Terrell,

I agree without a doubt with one thing: we trade Josh Smith to Philly, and they WILL run us silly….

terrell barron

June 9th, 2009
1:45 pm

I’d take Bosh over Brand in a heartbeat. Bosh could open up lanes for Big Al, with his range. He could also take a lot of pressure off of JJ, being an All-Star and all. And his post game is just as good or may be even better than Brands is already. Not to mention, he played at Tech, and he also gets the superstar treatment from the refs. lol!

terrell barron

June 9th, 2009
1:58 pm

Hell, I’d even trade Horford for Bosh. He’s just that good. Only thing is, we’d have to move Smith too. Sorry Darrell Starks, but Smith and Bosh on the same frontline? No thanks. I dont like that idea. A lefty at Center and a lefty at pf would be a 1st. lol!! Now if we could pull off a Bosh for Horford deal, then I’d definitely trade Josh Smith for Brand Ken Strickland. Look at this lineup:
Bibby/JJ/Marvin/Brand/Bosh.
Patty Mills(1strdr)/Flip/Mo/Pendegraph(2nd rdr)/Zaza and possibly Childress.
Now that’s what I’m talking about. Even Woody’s dimbass could’nt stop us then.

O'brien

June 9th, 2009
2:13 pm

Melvin, the reason why Toronto would make the trade Bosh for Josh, is because Bosh is a free agent next year, and he might not resign with Toronto. How would Toronto look if Bosh did not resign with them? Yeah, they will have the salary cap space, but I dont see another big name agent going to Toronto. And Josh is still under contract for 4 more years, and he still has potential. Plus one of Toronto’s assistants is Marc Ivaroni (sp), who was D’Antonio’s assistant. Their offense with Josh could be sick.

If I’m the Hawks, I make that move, because I would give Bosh the $18 mil or so he will ask for when his contract expires. He is a guaranteed 20 and 10 guy, plus playing with JJ would be great for him and JJ (and Woody).

jdewayneatl

June 9th, 2009
2:24 pm

Woody’s strife is playing young pg’s and not young players in general. Idk if many of you could remember way back but Josh Smith and Josh Childress started many games together. And Josh Smith started more than Childress their rookie year. Marvin Williams came in and started right away. I hate to say it but Sheldon Williams came in and started right away. And Al Horford came in and started right away. Acie Law was Woody’s first true pg that he had the chance to work with (Salim Staudamire was here but had trouble in Woody’s yard bc he was a tweener). Acie’s work on the court has be derailed to bc of injury. So I say take a PG at 19 and let Woody play him.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
2:30 pm

I hear ya Obrien but I’m a Josh fan so he stays in a Hawks uniform in my book unless its for Lebron, DWade, Kobe or Dwight.

terrell barron

June 9th, 2009
2:31 pm

Maynor, Flynn, or Mills. Dont blow it Rick Sund.

O'brien

June 9th, 2009
2:47 pm

Melvin, I’m a Josh fan too, but I keep waiting on him to take his game to the next level, and as long as Woody is here, I dont know if he will ever maximize his potential.

tb, If I am Sund, I am willing to move up a few slots to make sure I get the guy I want. Because you just dont know what order the PG’s are going to go in, and who might be left at 19.

G-Man

June 9th, 2009
2:52 pm

Will somebody please tell me the fascination with mills? His stock is based off a good game in the olympics. Otherwise he is getting thrashed for his inability to pass the ball.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
3:04 pm

O’brien,

Josh took his game to another level in the playoffs which showed me his maturity level has grown. Look, when comparing his stats to the likes of Amare and Bosh those guys are clearly ahead of him however I do think he’s a notch below the two right now but he could become a 20/10 guy in the near future and have more of an impact on the game than either two. Josh is not as skilled as the other two but I think he just as talented and plays the game with heart and embrace the challenges of playing for an disfunctional organization and never once complain about it (even during his contract fiasco last season) or his teammates in the media unlike Bosh and Amare. So yes, give me Josh. I will root, admire and support a player like that. Trophy or not….

newkid

June 9th, 2009
3:32 pm

Kapono (Toronto) for Evans (Philly) confirmed. So much for that nonsensical mantra regarding no trading within one’s division, right?

Ken Strickland

June 9th, 2009
4:03 pm

TERRELL BARRON-I’m not trying to push EBrand as the only solution to our problem. I’d also take CBosh over EBrand, and I wouldn’t hesitate to trade JSmith to get him either. I’d definitely get rid of Bibby or bring him off the bench and start a PG that can shoot and play DEF.
Actually, with both Bosh and Horford’s ability to score from the outside, a PG like ALaw would be awsome carving DEF’s up with his speed, quickness and penetrating ability. But that’s just the way I see it, and we all know Woodson doesn’t value those attributes.

He has a love afair with the jumpshot, because like Bibby, he was rather one dimensional and unathletic, but his prolific jumpshot allowed him to have a decent Pro career. That’s why he could care less about a young PG that possesses speed, quickness, penetrating ability, and also plays excellent DEF, but isn’t a prolific jumpshooter. His OFF is designed to sttack the DEF by shooting over it, which is why it offers few options and is so easily defended, rather than attacking it with penetration.

That’s also why we need to be careful about any of the PG’s in this yrs draft. I’ve read how some of you are enamored with the speed, quickness and penetrating ability of certain PG’s. What good are speed, quickness and penetrating ability if the HC doesn’t value those attributes over being a prolific jumpshooter?

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
4:15 pm

Melvin,

Josh’s stats went up because there was no one else to play. Marvin was hurt, Al was hurt, Bibby was to small and Joe was being tripled team. His stats went down this year and you can make an argument for his scoring going down because of bibby and flip, but that doesn’t explain his rebounding his shot blocking and his steals being down. On top of that he missed a decent amount of games this year.

The whole reason he is so important to the team is his ability to fill the stat sheet two blocks two steals, 8 to 12 rebounds, 16 to 18 points and he is not doing that.

What we need is josh to be more of a basketball player and less of an athletic guy who can’t be as an effective for a whole year when he roles his ankle in august.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
4:25 pm

Squawk,

Let see if I understood you said correctly. You said his stats went up b/c everyone else was hurt (AL/Marvin) or was ineffective b/c of tough defense (Joe/Bibby). Well good thing somebody did step up(Josh) b/c the Hawks may have lost in the first round… At least the man showed up under the big lights but I understand. Really, I do. Somebody has to be the fall guy…

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
4:45 pm

Melvin,

I am not making him the fall guy. I am glad he stepped up, I forgot to put that in there. And I will admit Joe played poorly, but how many times were people actually trying to keep the ball out of Josh’s hands or sending him a double team. The double team came to Al in the post several times, but they weren’t running people at Josh.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
4:53 pm

Squawk,

I can’t recall AL being double team in the post that often (if at all) but if he was commanding a double in the post (which is the same reason why so many on here is asking for a low post guy like Bosh) then the issue may point else where. Like the scheme of the offense. Maybe if we play thru the post then guys like Joe/Bibby/Marvin would have uncontested jumpshots.

terrell barron

June 9th, 2009
5:00 pm

Ken, you might as well forget about Acie Law. It’s evident, he doesn’t fit in Woody’s system, or lack there of.

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
5:04 pm

It never fails.

We talk about Joe being triple-teamed all day. So, uh….there should be 3 other players who are now open, right? Then why is it Joe is still taking more shots than anybody else and has the ball in his hands longer than anybody else?

Think before you answer…..

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
5:10 pm

Melvin,

Josh is the fall guy until he either leaves or becomes an all-star. You know how this works, bro’.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
5:11 pm

Big Ray,

Do I have to think if my answer to your question is “LMAO”….

O'brien

June 9th, 2009
5:12 pm

Josh’s rebounding and blocked shots went down, but part of the problem is Woody’s switching defense. However, Bosh’s career average (6 seasons) is 19.6 pts, 9.2 rebounds (basically a 20 and 10 every night). Josh’s career average (5 seasons) is 14 points, 7.2 rebounds. And Bosh only played 1 year of college.

Dont get me wrong, Josh has a lot of potential, but with Woody as the coach, I dont know if Josh will ever maximize it.

I’m a big Josh fan, but I’m a bigger Hawks fan, and I think Bosh makes the Hawks better immediately, because he gives you 20 and 10 every night, and teams respect his inside game, so that should open it up for JJ, and maybe Woody will allow them to play inside out for a change.

Other NBA News. The Sixers main weakness was no 3 pt shooting, and now they have a legit 3 pt shooter in Kapono (2 time winner of 3 pt shooting contest), a new coach, and probably EBrand for the whole season. All they need now is a PG, and they might overtake the Hawks next season.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
5:16 pm

Obrien,

Do you think Bosh would avg 20pts in a Hawks uniform in the same offense that endorse JJ/Bibby/Flip chucking up the shots??? And how many shots does Bosh attempt to get his 20pts vs Josh 17pts (I can’t look up the stats on my work computer)?

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
5:17 pm

Melvin,

Yeah it was very rare they would put him in the post, but when it happened they were doubling. I think the problem with getting someone like Bosh is that he isn’t a big body he is tall, but he isn’t going to push people around which would only help us with offense, but as far as protecting the basket it would not help. And who do we trade for him? I don’t like giving up Josh or Al for Bosh if its not straight up and if we don’t get a center.

Astro Joe

June 9th, 2009
5:21 pm

I don’t know why Joe shot 9 more FGAs than Smith during the playoffs (which averages to less than 1 more FGA per playoff game). But when someone answers that question, maybe they can answer why they shot a comparable field goal percentage during the playoffs despite opposing teams employing different defensive strategies against the players. I know I can’t figure it out. Oops, I almost forgot, our incompetent coach is selectively incompetent… he runs picture perfect plays for Joe but forces Smith to play 20 feet from the basket. So Woody’s utilization of Smith on offense is equally as effective at stopping him as opposing teams running double teams on Joe. Now I have it right. Wow, it’s amazing that Smith was able to score 8 more total points over those 11 games than Joe despite having his own coach working against him. Is it too early to offer him a $58M extension?

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
5:32 pm

Big Ray,

You are absolutely right to pose that question. There are several ways to look at it. I think much of blame lies on Joe and Woody. I think they revealed there love fest for each other more than ever at the end of this season. The stagnant offense designed to make Joe look like an all-star (not that he isn’t) has put a ceiling on every players potential on this team. The young point guard problem woody has might have less to do with Woody disliking and more with Woody feeling like they are going to look to spread the ball more and look less at Joe (but I digress). the real problem, the sickening fact in all this is that Joe has been in an offense where spreading the ball and running was the key and yet he has not to even try to push that on Woody and he might be the only person who can.
I feel there is more to the original problem. The players are on the court and can dictate how they want to play so when Joe is doubled there needs to be more movement, but there isn’t nobody is running to Joe saying here I am pass me the ball or cutting to the basket.
Then there is that old problem of the other players not wanting to take shots. hmmm. maybe thats why Josh shoots all those bad shots to show Woody and Joe that he is not afraid to shoot ever.

A Tribe Called Quest

June 9th, 2009
5:32 pm

How can you even mention Elton Brand? He is never going to be healthy again.

These stupid bigs keep putting on more and more and more and more muscle and it kills their legs.

Oden, Okafor, Bynum, Brand…
you’ll see

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
5:38 pm

Astro Joe,

Is that pro Smith or anti Smith I can’t tell? What’s interesting about that is what if they switched Josh’s placement on the court with Marvin then I think that puts Marvin in a place where he can drive or shoot. and it puts Josh closer to the basket. But i think that was your point as well its Woody, which is sad cause I really liked the guy at first.

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
5:51 pm

Well how about that.

The Sixers knew they needed a shooter. They went out and got one, via trade. It all looks so simple…

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
6:10 pm

Sekou’s Blog. Where Amazing Happens.

Amazing how THIS:

It never fails.

We talk about Joe being triple-teamed all day. So, uh….there should be 3 other players who are now open, right? Then why is it Joe is still taking more shots than anybody else and has the ball in his hands longer than anybody else?

Think before you answer…..

Turns into THIS:

I don’t know why Joe shot 9 more FGAs than Smith during the playoffs (which averages to less than 1 more FGA per playoff game). But when someone answers that question, maybe they can answer why they shot a comparable field goal percentage during the playoffs despite opposing teams employing different defensive strategies against the players. I know I can’t figure it out. Oops, I almost forgot, our incompetent coach is selectively incompetent… he runs picture perfect plays for Joe but forces Smith to play 20 feet from the basket. So Woody’s utilization of Smith on offense is equally as effective at stopping him as opposing teams running double teams on Joe. Now I have it right. Wow, it’s amazing that Smith was able to score 8 more total points over those 11 games than Joe despite having his own coach working against him. Is it too early to offer him a $58M extension?

I don’t recall mentioning or even alluding to Smith in relation to Joe. I remember saying 3 guys should be open if Joe is getting triple-teamed (Ok, really it should be two open guys). I don’t recall mentioning anything about the playoffs. I was actually referring to the normal state of affairs. But in the interest of the argument, I dug up some regular season stats and saw that JJ takes 18 shots per game on average, while Smith takes 12. What does this mean? Hell, I don’t know, but I figured it was good to throw it out there just in case there might be an argument waiting to be born. Maybe it means Joe should have averaged more than 5 ppg than Smith, despite shoot a lower percentage, with Smith having perfect plays run for him while Joe toils in basketball hell, where double teams wait for him every second of every game that he plays in. Or maybe it means what you want it to mean.

Sekou’s blog. Where Amazing REALLY happens.

Big Ray

June 9th, 2009
6:10 pm

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
6:19 pm

Big Ray,

You lost me. maybe we can solve this with your answer.

LouHudson

June 9th, 2009
6:21 pm

Stop this madness, Bosh is not a center. If the Hawks make a trade for Bosh, it will not solve their two biggest issues besides Woody as the coach. The Center and PG positions will still unsolved. Bosh would make the Hawks a little better, but they still will not get past the second round. For the ten time, trade Marvin and Speedy for McGee or Pryszilla and a player or draft pick. If that does not happen, sign Kamam. If the Hawks don’t resign Bibby, the money there for signing Jarrett Jack.
TRADE Marvin, Speedy and dump Bibby, period! Now, the Hawks are able to resign Flip, ZaZa, and most importantly sign Childress. You solve the center issues(McGee, Pryszilla, or Kamam) and the pg as well Jack/Law. Your 2,3, and 4 slots are solid with a defender stopper in Childess. Lebron, Wade, Kobe, or Boston SF aren’t going anywhere.
Everyone needs to stop talking trades and FA signings which do not solidify the 1 and 5 positions.
Here’s your lineups next year!
STARTERS
PG – Jack
SG – JJ
Sf – Jsmoove
PF – Horford
C – Kamam, McGee, or Pryszilla

2ND UNIT
PG – Law
SG – Flip/Childress
SF – Childress/Evans
PF – Solo
C – ZaZa

the rest who cares! Go Hawks!

RealSquawk

June 9th, 2009
6:30 pm

Lou Hudson,

I do agree with you about Bosh, but I don’t think moving Smoove to small forward spot helps him or the team. we need to keep him close to the basket.

So lets solve the problem move Marvin to the small forward and give Smith 26 to 30 minutes off the bench. he is our energy guy so lets let him give us energy off the bench and let him focus on doing all the energy play putting him in a lamar odom role.

Astro Joe

June 9th, 2009
6:43 pm

Ray, you’re right. The regular season results clearly suggest that something should have been different. Nothing about winning 10 more games and a 4th seed despite missing every front court starter for at least 10 games suggests that the regular season was sufficiently successful. Heaven knows that those energetic performances like the first game following the All Star break shows how Smith was clearly ready to shoulder more of the losd on a team with playoff aspirations.

Blast

June 9th, 2009
7:15 pm

Real madness. Bosh is mad soft, he is not a center, and too expensive for those stats. Next season Josh will be putting up better numbers than him. Josh was Hawks best player in the playoffs, followed by Flip and Zaza. Josh gets his head together, he’ll be a star in this league.

Astro Joe

June 9th, 2009
7:22 pm

Ray, since you also questionned my reading comprehension skills, let me see if I am dumber than a third grader. Shortly after 3:00, Melvin lauds Smith for stepping up in the playoffs. RealSquawks responds later that Joe was tripled (in the playoffs), which impeded his scoring ability. They continue to debate stats about… the playoffs. So when you chimed up shortly after 5:00, you weren’t discussing the playoffs? But then you go bold, indented and italicized on me about referencing playoff performance? OK, I guess I’m just wrong and I don’t understand how to follow a subject matter on the blog. My bad!

O'brien

June 9th, 2009
7:32 pm

Sekou, can we get a new blog? We are up to 534 comments. Nothing new to report on the draft? Team workouts? Free agency? Any contact with Chills? NBA finals?

Throw us a bone here.

niremetal

June 9th, 2009
7:47 pm

Ray,

Sounds simple, but Kapono is just beyond awful on defense. Trading Reggie Evans was actually kind of stupid, I think, because he was pretty much their only source of toughness. Kapono is useless unless he’s open behind the arc. He can’t drive. He can’t pass. He can’t play D.

Considering the fact that Brand is likely to miss significant time, I’d have kept the rugged PF workhorse and saved the $1M.

Sautee

June 9th, 2009
8:18 pm

Nire,

“Kapono is useless unless he’s open behind the arc. He can’t drive. He can’t pass. He can’t play D.”

But he CAN hit a jumper! LOL it sounds like a player Woody would use for 35 minutes a game. ;-)

Ariose

June 9th, 2009
8:35 pm

Nire, Philly also has that big White Kid that went down with an injury in preseason last year. I think they were planning to use him a lot before he got injured. Also, this frees up more PT for the very talented Mauriece Speights…

Ariose

June 9th, 2009
8:47 pm

Fact: Hawks Original starters Mike,Joe,Marvin,Smoove,Horford ONLY PLAYED I think it wasd 23 regular season games toghther……We won 47 games with pretty much someone ALWAYS injured.

ZAZA,Solo,Sheed,Horford,Bass should solve that Adding Anthony Parker,Gerald Green(700k…..calm down), and re-signing Flip will sure up the Wings. I think we can stick with Bibby/Acie as long as Acie gets some PT. Make sure to draft the best possible PG’s in the draft(thats right, WITH BOTH PICKS. WE’VE SCREWED UP TOO MUCH MORE QUANTITY=HEGHER% OF GETTING QUALITY….WE CAN’T STIKE OUT TWICE IN ONE DRAFT CAN WE????)

Trade Speedy. Sign % Trade Chills for whoever drafted either Gerald Henderson or Wayne Ellington.

If Philly drafts a PG MAybe we can get our Hands on Louis Williams??? Speedy for Lou?

niremetal

June 9th, 2009
9:07 pm

Ariose,

Yeah, but it also means less playing time for the even more talented Thaddeus Young. How do you find enough minutes for Iggy, Young, and Kapono? I don’t see Young ever playing minutes at the 4, and any system where you have Iggy spending a lot of the time at SG is poorly conceived, as the Sixers learned earlier this year…

niremetal

June 9th, 2009
9:11 pm

And oh, for the love of GOD do not bring Lou Williams here. He can’t shoot, pass, or play defense. He’s good driving to the rim, but he is a genuine tweener guard who has shown zero ability to act as a distributor. Think Flip but a little quicker, more turnover-prone, and 2 inches shorted. He’d be only so-so under the best of coaches and would be an unmitigated disaster under Woody.

Astro Joe

June 9th, 2009
10:01 pm

OK, so I was checking out playoff stats on 82games.com.

http://www.82games.com/0809/playoffs/playoffs.htm

I’ve been wondering how many of Smith’s shots were assisted by his teammates. Despite the frequent comments by many bloggers, it felt like he was set-up for success far more than failure during the playoffs. That site shows the percent of baskets scored by a player that were assisted, that is, the made shot was off a pass that was credited as an assist. As you would expect, perimeter players are not nearly as “assisted” as much as bigs. Anyway, I compared Smith to comparable PFs. Obviously, his game is not similar to Rashard Lewis nor Dirk. So I looked at Aldridge, Boozer, Scola, David West and Big Baby. I was surprised to see that only Big Baby had more baskets that were “assisted” than Smith. Davis had 80% of his made baskets assisted while Smith was at 75%. Most others ranged between 55%-65%.

So what does that mean? Well, it could mean that the Hawks took what the defense gave them and found Smith in the right position. It could mean that Smith did a better job of playing to his strengths. Or it could mean that Woody made an adjustment to address the defense being played on Johnson.

For those math wizards, please check my math. If Smith took 159 FGAs in the playoffs, made 67 shots and was assisted on 50 shots (75% of his made shots), doesn’t that mean that he shot 15% or 16 of 109 on non-assisted shots? Is that right?

Have fun checking out the site, it has a ton of in-depth information.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
10:02 pm

Nire,
Just curious. How in the heck have did you become a Hawks fan living in the north???

A Tribe Called Quest

June 9th, 2009
10:16 pm

It’s very annoying to me that there is hardly any replay used in NBA games. It’s so obvious that in every game there are 3 egregious calls by the refs which should be reviewed. Why is most of the reviewing done in MLB? Nobody watches baseball anymore

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
10:29 pm

Astro,

Simple question. Would you say Joe elevated his game in the playoffs(2008 and 2009)?

Ariose

June 9th, 2009
10:37 pm

Nire, Thad has been doing spot-duty at the 4 spot for the past two seasons. But I agree, Kapono will snatch his minutes, and Iggay at the 2 is no good.

A little tough on Lou though nire? You know, they’ve never given Lou the Keys to the car so to speak. I agree he may not be the best fit here, but If he’s allowed to get starters minutes, good things will happen for whatever squad he is playing for……..of course, i’m biased because I went to Highschool with him heh…

O'brien

June 9th, 2009
10:45 pm

nire, I agree that Kapono’s skills are very limited. But he is a solid bench player, and he makes less than $6 mil a year. Compare that to Bibby, who will probably cost $7 or $8 mil, and play 35 minutes every night. And thats exactly why I dont think we should resign Bibby.

If the sixers have a PG who can drive and dish, then all Kapono has to do is knock down the 3.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
10:55 pm

Astro,

Looks like Josh (+3.2) Roland rating is higher than Joe (-3.0). What the heck is a Roland rating anyway…lol

niremetal

June 9th, 2009
11:11 pm

Melvin,

I was born and raised in Atlanta (lived in Mableton, Smyrna, and Sandy Springs along the way). I moved to Philly for college, grad school, and my first year of law school, then transferred to DC to finish law school, and am now back in Philly. Through all that, though, I’ve remained purely loyal to Atlanta’s teams…although I honestly barely follow any sport but basketball now. I admit to developing a soft spot for the Wizards while I was in DC, though.

O’Brien,

If the sixers have a PG who can drive and dish, then all Kapono has to do is knock down the 3.

On offense, that’s true. But what do you do with him on the other end? Seriously, they just acquired basically a slower, less marketable (read: attractive) version of Korver. At least Korver could sell some jerseys. Kapono is just deadweight 50% of the time he’s on the floor.

Melvin

June 9th, 2009
11:56 pm

Nire,

Korver does look like Ashton Kuster….lol

Ed

June 10th, 2009
1:14 am

I think this is the first trade of the off season

PHILADELPHIA — The Philadelphia 76ers have traded forward Reggie Evans to the Toronto Raptors for shooter Jason Kapono.

At least we know the talking between GM’s is going on…

Sekou Smith

June 10th, 2009
2:08 am

New blog up. Been underground for a few days working on some things around Hawksville. But we’re back with a new monster entry that requires your immediate input.