Wanted: Role Players!

Frontcourt help like Charlie Villanueva could make a huge difference for the Hawks in the future.

Frontcourt help like Charlie Villanueva could make a huge difference for the Hawks in the future.

HAWKSVILLE – I know that the NBA hype machine would have you believe that the NBA playoffs is basically a test of wills between Kobe Bryant and LeBron James.

If you let the networks tell it, we’re all just bearing witness to the crowning of the king or the validation of KB24’s reign as the heir to his Airness.

Count Magic superstar center and Atlanta native Dwight Howard among those who have heard just about enough. And the AJC’s own Jeff Schultz isn’t far behind Howard in the enough is enough line.

The only problem with all the Kobe/LeBron fuss is that arguably the two most critical guys on the floor thus far in these outstanding Eastern and Western Conference finals have been Lakers’ swingman Trevor Ariza and Orlando Magic super sub Mickael Pietrus.

As well Bryant, James, Howard, Carmelo Anthony, Chauncey Billups, Pau Gasol, Rashard Lewis, Hedo Turkoglu and all the other major players have played during certain stretches, Ariza and Pietrus have been just as, if not more important to their team’s efforts.

Ariza’s made two game-clinching plays to seal wins for the Lakers, both defensive gems on inbounds plays. And Pietrus has not only been a lights out shooter against the Cavs, he’s played James as well defensively as any player I’ve seen in the last three seasons – and that includes defensive stalwarts Ron Artest and Bruce Bowen.

Now I’ll admit that my theory could be the product of viewing way too much playoff basketball the past month and counting, or an excessive amount of fumes to the dome from a long weekend spent over the top of my grill. But it seems like the contributions of these two role players will have as much to do with who plays in the NBA Finals as any singular effort from a superstar for any of the four teams remaining in this postseason.

Which brings me to our favorite topic ‘round these parts … the Hawks and their roster in need of major surgery this summer (more on that below).

Folks keep telling me about who needs to go to make this team better. And I keep thinking about what they need to add to this group to get better.

The Hawks need guys like Ariza and Pietrus to complete what they started with last year’s playoff appearance and continued this season with their Eastern Conference semifinal appearance.

Flip Murray and Mo Evans qualify, as does Zaza Pachulia. But of the three, only Evans is guaranteed to be in a Hawks uniform in the fall. Not only do the Hawks need to find ways to keep Murray and Pachulia in the fold, they need to find more guys like them (or better).

That’s where the Hawks greatest improvement will come next season (save a blockbuster trade), in the sum of their parts. And those parts have to improve down the roster.

Can you imagine the Hawks with an explosive scoring power forward like Charlie Villanueva (a restricted free agent this summer with a bit of a Twitter habit) or Chris Wilcox (another free agent this summer) coming off of their bench? And not as a replacement for Pachulia but as a running mate. That’s the kind of addition that helps recast the Hawks for next season.

If you’re serious about keeping the core together and still improving your roster, which is the theme we’ve heard from the Hawks non-stop since they were swept out of the playoffs. 

DRAFT CHATTER is the favorite topic of many this time of year, and for good reason.

Draftniks everywhere have man-crushes on Spanish sensation Ricky Rubio ...

Draftniks everywhere have man-crushes on Spanish sensation Ricky Rubio ...

Spanish point guard phenom Ricky Rubio is the guy generating the most attention in the draft, for reasons good and apparently bad, per some folks.

The fine folks at TrueHoop did a bang up job detailing the luster and the risk of a player like Rubio, who is universally regarded as the best point guard “prospect” to come out of Europe in some time, and perhaps ever.

My most trusted source on all things Rubio is Lang Whitaker of SLAM Magazine, who has been on the Rubio bandwagon for years now. He’s the first person I can remember having seen Rubio play in person. And as best I can remember, he was the first writer to travel to Spain to interview and write about Rubio. So I’m going on his word that Rubio is going to be a star in the NBA.

“He is,” Whitaker said by phone Tuesday morning from his New York office. “The thing with Rubio is … did you see the gold medal game? He played great against Chris Paul, Deron Williams and Jason Kidd. I don’t know who else you want to see him against to convince you that he’s going to be a star.”

Lang doesn’t have to convince me. I’m willing to play along with the international charade as long as the player is as talented as Rubio (and I did watch the gold medal game. Rubio made some nice plays but he wasn’t what stood out to me).

But not everyone I’ve talked to is convinced.

“I’d much rather have Derrick Rose,” one Eastern Conference executive told me by phone Tuesday morning. “And it’s not even close in my eyes. Don’t get me wrong, Rubio is talented. He might have tons of potential. But seriously, how many times have we said that about one of these young kids and then he gets over here and we find out there are all these things about his game that just don’t add up in the NBA? That’s what worries me about Rubio. We’ve seen glimpses of him against NBA competition. It’s just like when you watch Rudy Fernandez and Linas Kleiza look unstoppable in international play and then they get to the NBA season and you realize it’s a totally different game. Rubio is going to find the same issues where his game is concerned.”

How that’s different from any other college player/prospect is beyond me. I mean, who knew Rose would be so good from the start? Actually, lots of people expected it. In fact, that’s what led the draft debate last year between Rose and Michael Beasley. There doesn’t seem to be the same sort of debate between the point guard and power forward this year (I’ve heard very few people discuss let alone advocate taking Rubio over Blake Griffin). 

others prefer a sure thing phenom like Derrick Rose.

... while others wonder if he's even in the same class as a transcendent talent like Chicago's own Derrick Rose.

“A much better gauge is a guy who has dominated in Europe and then comes over here at the top of his game, like Pau Gasol did, like Manu Ginobili did and Luis Scola did,” the Eastern Conference exec continued.” They showed up ready to play because they weren’t just prospects, they were established players and really stars over there. The bottom line is this, the way you develop young players here and in Europe is vastly different. And it doesn’t always work best for young international players over here.”

An unabashed Hawks fan, Lang barked at me over a week ago about what he wants to see his hometown team do with the 19th pick in the June draft.

His email from last week:

Rick Sund’s last three first round picks? Robert Swift, Saer Sene and Johan Petro.

I really hope the Hawks draft Toney Douglas from FSU. We need to get his name out there. Dude can shoot, drives all the time, can play the 1 and 2 and was ACC defensive player of the year. And he’s from Jonesboro. I don’t understand why more people aren’t talking about him. Coach K said this at the ACC Tournament: ”He’s my favorite non-Duke player in the country. I love that guy. I talk about him a lot to our guys. They’re probably mad at me. He’s as good as there is in college.”

THE HAWKS AREN’T THE ONLY TEAM IN THE SOUTHEAST DIVISION stuck in point guard limbo with the draft and free agency fast approaching. The team the Hawks vanquished in the first round of the playoffs is in a similar predicament, though the Miami Heat already have one proven building block in Mario Chalmers.

My main man Mike Wallace of the Miami Herald points out as much in his latest blog, shouting out Hawks point guards past and present in the process:

And it makes you wonder. Why does every other team in the league seem to have a spare Flip Murray on the roster, yet the Heat goes two seasons without one? Shaun Livingston didn’t have the legs. Marcus Banks lacked the skills. And Penny Hardaway – dare we say – didn’t have anything left other than pleasant memories of when he used to be somebody in this league.

This Magic-Cavs series is stocked with serviceable, stop-gap type veteran parts at the point that Miami either tried to get and couldn’t, parted with too soon or probably should have pursued harder when it had the chance.

Orlando has three of them: Rafer Alston, Anthony Johnson and Tyronn Lue.

How crazy would it be to see the Magic make the NBA Finals with two point guards (Johnson and Lue for those of you who have just recently joined us here in Hawksville) the Hawks shipped out of town to get Mike Bibby on their roster?

Might Jonesboro's Toney Douglas be an option for the Hawks with the 19th pick in the June draft?

Might Jonesboro's Toney Douglas be an option for the Hawks with the 19th pick in the June NBA Draft? It's an intriguing idea, courtesy of Lang Whitaker of SLAM Magazine.

And depending on what happens in July, Bibby could be joining them as ex-Hawks point guards.

The Hawks, of course, are in need of a starting material at the point. And that might come in the form of Bibby, if the Hawks can find a way to reel him back in from the free agent waters with the right deal, or someone else.

Speaking of Bibby, the good folks at Hawksquawk, threw some great questions my way about the team and where things might be headed. And as you can probably imagine, Bibby’s name came up several times.

We’ve discussed Bibby endlessly around here, so won’t go into detail about the tenor of the conversation they are having about him elsewhere. But I’ll share this one question and answer (and suggest you check out the rest of it on their site (which is pretty impressive, by the way):

Q. Was there a change in the locker-room demeanor since the addition of Bibby? Did he bring a playoff presence to the Hawks team? Is there any urgency (or perceived urgency) to resign Flip?

A. Bibby assumed a leadership position automatically, which is what the Hawks needed. He eased the pressure on Joe and Woodson as well, which needed to happen. And more than a playoff presence he brought a sense of accountability to the locker room, which was lacking before his arrival. He was the right personality and player at just the right time for the Hawks. It was almost like he added that “why not us?” factor to this team that wasn’t there before, a sense of they could do some things with him that didn’t really seem possible until he showed up. Flip proved invaluable this season and while I wouldn’t call it urgency, there’s certainly a need to make sure Flip is kept in the fold.

WITH SO MANY ROSTER QUESTIONS TO DEAL WITH THIS SUMMER it’s hard for me to imagine the Hawks’ brass taking too many days off between now and late July.

I know they’ve begun their predraft workouts, which unlike in years past are not open to the media. And the scaled down predraft camp has moved back to Chicago from Orlando this summer. It begins this week and runs into this weekend.

As far as the Hawks’ individual workouts, I’m not sure there will be much to talk about anyway. Astro Joe emailed a little while ago wondering if they’d begun and whether or not I’d seen anything worth talking about. I promptly relayed the story to him of Al Horford’s workout two years ago that left quite a few people scratching their heads as to what all the fuss was about.

 

Billy Knight went 1-for-2 (so far) in the first round of his last draft with the Hawks.

Billy Knight went 1-for-2 (so far) in the first round of his last draft with the Hawks.

Had the Hawks based their pick in that year’s draft on the workout alone, Horford might not have been the choice (luckily for us all Billy Knight stuck to his “gimme the best power forward type I can get at this spot” guns and made the right call).

Different teams value different things in the predraft process. Some want to see what a guy looks like on the hoof or how he tests out in various drills that have little or nothing to do with why you’d want a guy on your team.

Others want to see if he interviews a certain way, wanting to make sure they’re adding the right type of guy to their team. Me, I need to know a guy can play. And I’m positive I can tell more from watching him play in games than I can from anything he’ll do in a scripted workout.

But that doesn’t mean I won’t relay what I’m hearing leading up to the draft. After all, this is easily one of the Hawks’ most critical summers in a string of huge ones. What they do in the draft and free agency basically determines if they’re going to stay among the upper echelon of the Eastern Conference or slide back down to the playoff purgatory waters that they bathed in for years.

657 comments Add your comment

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
2:42 pm

Sekou,

Yeah, I like Toney a lot, too.

I noticed that you didn’t mention Acie. Any news of him actually being on the block?

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
3:12 pm

kirknga,

Back to the “fire Woody” thing. I wrote a loooonnnng post last night that was swallowed by the matrix (which promptly told me that I had already posted the same message, even though it never showed up even once).

So, basically I said this:

Sund’s actions (or lack thereof) HAVE to be predicated on the fact that BK tried 3 times to fire Woody and was rebuffed by the owners. Who in turn, offered BK a ONE YEAR deal.

So, if the ASG’s wisdom was to offer a ONE YEAR deal to BK, how could they argue when he leaves Woody to coach out his contract (a ONE YEAR remainder).

By the way, that was an excellent post, though your frustration was painful to read. And I’m not so sure that Woody is a dead man walking.

What if we went to the ECF next year? Could he fire Woody then?

What if Sund gave Woody marching orders on not wearing out your stars, and coming up with a patterned offense that involves the bigs? And he’s waiting to see if Woody can actually DO that?

Yes, he’s certainly seen Woody’s stubbornness. Haven’t we all! ;-)

But would/could he change if his job depended on it? (total conjecture, of course)

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
3:36 pm

Sekou,
Signed me up for the Charlie V bandwagon. I think he would be a good guy to bring off the bench. His versatility would allow us to play several different lineups as he could sub for Marvin, Josh and Horford..

G State Ben

May 26th, 2009
3:39 pm

Two role players that can be had: Matt Barnes and Brandon Bass. Like them both a ton for this team.

I love TD (from my neck of the woods) but he’s not a 1st round pick. He’s 6′2, is not terribly fast and is not a true point. Taking him over a guy like Teague, Lawson or even Darren Collison would be a huge mistake. I’d be okay with him in the 2nd but not at #19.

I have a feeling that it’s going to be a big man. Sund loves ‘em.

doc

May 26th, 2009
3:40 pm

sekou, whether people are going to admit it because of the notion of a rotation of eight, the hawks have to find a way to get more rest time for its top eight that is from a legitimate nba type players. the toll these guys are taking playing the minutes they do affect outcomes at the end of the season. so instead of 8 quality guys they have to find a way to have 10 or 11 guys that could play on any team instead of only ours. sund says something about you need a certain amount of top 12 guys at a position to be elite. we need to begin to approach that.

sign up douglas now! he took fsu on his back and nearly made some serious march madness news.

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
3:41 pm

Sautee, OK, I found the storyline, thanks. I think I suggested something similar a few weeks ago. Get off the fence with regard to our head coach. Choose a coach, give him a good contract and let’s play ball. If that coach is Woody, fine. If someone else, fine. But it certainly feels like they are hedging against a commitment (likely due to court crap) and I do think that can impact the on-court product.

Bloggers have ripped Woody for the lack of Acie’s development. Sekou reported that BK tried to fire Woody around the time that the Bibby trade was made, mid-February, 2008. Sekou reported in that same article that BK had made two previous attempts to fire Woody. Take a look at Acie’s game log from his rookie season. Dude GOT PLAYING TIME prior to one of his many injuries and before a third attempt to fire Woody and the trade for Bibby. Woody has had a ton of first round picks and they ALL received meaningful playing time during their rookie campaigns. So what was different with Acie? Maybe it was the sense of urgency that comes when your boss is trying to can your butt. (Coupled with the arrival od the best PG Woody has coached). Receiving a paltry two-year extension from a new boss couldn’t have inspired a wealth of job security in Woody.

If Woody is going to get better as a coach he must feel secure enough to try some new approaches that may very well fail. If he doesn’t have that comfort level, no one should expect him to deviate from a formula that has resulted in consecutive playoff appearances. Bloggers have suggested an “offensive coordinator” for the coaching staff. That idea does come with some amount of risk. Should Woody take on that risk as a lame duck coach? I can hear him in Sund’s office at the end of the year, “yeah, we took a step back but I was trying to integrate a new offensive philosophy so losing 8 more games and going from a 4th seed to a 7th seed should be acceptable”. Shortly thereafter, Sund is addressing the media as he announces the search for a new head coach.

I agree with Kirk. One way or another, Sund and the owners need to get a coach with a real contract. Time to get off the pot.

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
3:45 pm

Sign me up on the Villanueva and Douglas band-wagons. No thanks to Wilcox. Unless Sund offers Woody a bonus for finishing among the top 5 teams in fast break points, there is no need to bring Wilcox on board with a half-court team. I like the Bass and Barnes suggestions as well. But a bench that features Flip, Childress and Villanueva plus some minimum wage VETS (not rookies but vets) would work for me.

Atlanta Hawks Front Office

May 26th, 2009
3:50 pm

Wanted: an “All-Star” that doesn’t get…TIRED!!

Acie Law, IV

May 26th, 2009
3:52 pm

Wanted: PLAYING TIME!!!

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
3:52 pm

Sekou,

Although point guard is consider to be the strongest position in the upcoming draft, I think the next great point guard will come from the 2010 draft and his name is John Hall. Just wait until he hit the big stage next season in the NCAA’s. Watch how many teams will tank after the all-star break next season. The Kings may get the face of their franchise in 2010 draft after missing out on the Blake Griffin sweepstakes in this year draft…

Mike Woodson

May 26th, 2009
3:53 pm

Wanted: an extension…please?

City of Saint Louis

May 26th, 2009
3:54 pm

Wanted: our basketball franchise back, since you have done nothing with it in 41 years.

gwills

May 26th, 2009
4:00 pm

Hey Sekou I am new here to blog, I’ve just been reading comments for the last week or so. I totally agree with Lang on the Toney D. draft pick. I was just talking to a coworker who is also a Hawks fan about him. Even though he may not be the fastest or a so called pure point guard, the kid has what it takes and he can adjust his game. Call me crazy, but while watching these playoffs when I look at at Chauncy Billups; I see Toney D. Also, remember the knock on Billups out of college and his first couple of years in the league was that he was not a pure point guard. Just ask Chris Paul about that fallacy. I work in a clayton county middle school and I’ve followed this kid since High School. Believe me, Douglass will be better than Teague, Lawson and Darren Collison. The kid is a hard work and a gamer, Period!

Michael Gearon, Jr.

May 26th, 2009
4:03 pm

Wanted: a soul.

Malone

May 26th, 2009
4:13 pm

What is the deal with Cenk Akyol, the Turkish PG we drafted a few years back? Is he a factor in our off-season plans?

rms

May 26th, 2009
4:21 pm

Sorry guys but based on the previous draft of guys we passed on and guys we drafted its kinda hard for me to trust the coach evaluating talent. He might say a certain guy is too small or too slow or not athletic enough to play and he gets drafted by another team and plays lights out! They only got the Horford pick right by default. If he played another position besides forward they would have passed him up. Typical…..

NoleRick

May 26th, 2009
4:29 pm

As a Seminole fan and a Hawks fan, I would love to see Toney in a Hawks Uni. I hope he can provide some highlights for ATL like his brother Harry in the Falcons uni!

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
4:33 pm

Here’s a profile on Toney Douglas. Sounds like a good fit to pair with Joe (long term) but is not likely ready to start in his rookie year (for a team with playoff expectations). Interesting comment in his profile about him being a good match with a ball-handling, tall guard.

http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Toney-Douglas-1231/

Willie Coyote

May 26th, 2009
4:36 pm

I’m glad you mentioned the “NBA hype machine” here. Seriously, can the fans of one of the playoff teams or the NBA in general just watch a playoff game and not have LeBron and Kobe stuffed down their throats during every comercial break and during the game by the commentators?

I’d like to see the Hawks keep Zaza and add some more bigs off the bench. Charlie V would be a great addition. They also need to decide if they are sticking with Acie or going in another direction.

swatguy

May 26th, 2009
4:39 pm

Role players are fine and good Sekou. But, we need the “Alpha”. I would send any two starters(except Josh) plus a #1 for Granger. That does mean Joe and Marvin for Danny Boy.

The bold strike is needed, get some fire for the Hawks Belly.
Granger is as close to superstar as any other. The price (2* + #1) is not too large.

Javaris for Acie too.

SLAM ONLINE | » Links: Floppers

May 26th, 2009
4:41 pm

[...] Hey, shoutouts to the Memphis Commercial-Appeal and to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution for quoting me in their Ricky Rubio coverage of late. (And I managed to get Sekou on my Toney [...]

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
4:42 pm

Strange.

When Sund was slowing around with re-signing Childress, then later trying to replace him, and getting Smith signed……it was all deemed the sage moves of an old, wise hand.

Now he’s doing the same thing (time-wise)with Woody, and it’s a crime. Heh…

Wilcox says he fits well in New York with D’Antoni. That means he doesn’t fit well HERE. No spank-you Mr. Helpy-Helperton. Get Brandon Bass instead.

At #19, Sund takes BJ Mullens if he’s available, and a tall European to be named later, if he isn’t….

Yes to Charlie Villanueva. He’d be invaluable off the bench, and a great plug-in to the starting lineup if Marvin is injured. Check that, he’s more than a sub. He’s an OPTION (sort of like Lamar Odom). If you don’t know what I mean by that, think harder…

Mr. Douglas seems like a good add. A reach at #19, perhaps, or would he last until we pick in the 2nd round? Either way, we need somebody that has “it.” “It” meaning that thing that makes your team’s head coach salivate at the very thought of getting that guy some playing time. No, I don’t expect such a thing with two able-bodied vets in front of him, but you want the guy to make the coach WANT to play him, when the opportunity presents itself…

G State Ben

May 26th, 2009
4:43 pm

Astro Joe, he’s not tall! He’s 6′2. Acie is 6′3.75 and under contract. If we don’t keep Acie, we have to have a vet PG. They’ll be plenty on the market in Ray Felton (RFA), Jarrett Jack (RFA), Luther Head (UFA), Ramon Sessions (RFA), Kevin Ollie (UFA) and Ronnie Price (UFA).

jhan

May 26th, 2009
4:47 pm

Joe – “a bench that features Flip, Childress and Villanueva” sign me up! Maybe add ZaZa or Gortat to the mix & we’re ready to roll.

I think Flip is a must. If we could add Childress or Villanueva that would be great. Both would be fantastic!

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
4:48 pm

Swatguy,

The question is, does Javaris fit here? I don’t know the answer. What I do know is that the idea is to get a young “prospect” like that BEFORE he begans to PROVE, via the stat box, just how good he can be. Hawks front office hasn’t been too good with that for years. But hey, there’s always hope that this changes, right?

Either way, I see no reason for Law to stay. If he does, something’s gotta give. When he’s healthy, he doesn’t get the PT. Then he goes out injured. It may not be his fault, but the fact is, nobody’s talking excitedly about getting him back to health, back in the fold, etc. That’s never good. He’s outta here, or I’ll be surprised. I’m already speculating aimlessly about replacements, if there is to be one, that is.

newkid

May 26th, 2009
4:59 pm

Sekou, I’ll give you 2 or 3 Rubios for one John Wall. Oops, sorry he’s not available until the 2010 draft is he?

If I had the luxury of choosing between Hedo and Charlie V, you take V and I’ll gladly take the one sometimes referred to as the Turkish Michael Jordan. I’ll say again, we need to come away from the summer with at least one of two players from Orlando – Hedo or Gortat; would love to have them both.

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
5:01 pm

I’m not hung up on a guy being 6′2″. If he can play the spot we need him to play, and has ways of making up for his lack of height, then sign him up. However, if you can get the same things out of a bigger player, then it’s obvious that you should look at other intangibles, but you go with the bigger guy (all else being equal).

Having said that, I’m not too thrilled about 6′2″ guys at the SG spot. Unless they’re coming off the bench and have the skills to get the job done, that is. Flip Murray comes to mind at 6′3″, yes?

Other than that, plenty of guys that are about that height that do well at the pg spot. Andre Miller, Tony Parker, etc.

….Luther Head is NOT a pg…

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
5:01 pm

Ray, as I understand, you would know a crime when you see one. I’m glad you agree. Ha!

G State Ben, Acie is gone. You know that look that players give other players who don’t play hurt? You know that look that Speedy received when he played in that Memphis game? That was the look I saw some of the guys give Acie. There are two ways to stop dribble penetration. A cheap PG who lives for playing tenacious defense or an expensive center who shuts down the lane. While I’d love both, one is easier to find (and cheaper) than the other. If Sund could trade down into the 24-28 position, I’d roll the dice with Douglas. Bring back Bibby on a 2-year deal and let Douglas be the apprentice instead of Acie.

swatguy

May 26th, 2009
5:07 pm

Big Ray,
The names coming out are suitable in my mind. Be that Sessions, Felton, Jack too.
I would investigate the possibility of acquiring Westbrook (Marvin + a 2nd) or Hinrich. GM’s may be gearing up for ‘10, but we may need to boldly move now. Consider David Anderson if Zaza is not signed. Zaza does bring needed passion. we need a bruiser down low but not a “Batista” but a Reggie Evans.
A lot of options.

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
5:08 pm

newkid, I feel the same way about the Milqaukee guys, Villanueva or Sessions.

Chad Ford compared Douglas to Eddie House but we know that Douglas is an outstanding defender (I think he was ACC DPOY). But if he is like Eddie House, is that significantly different than Bibby? As long as he has PG-quality ball handling skills, he could work playing alongside Joe for extended minutes. Especially if he is bringing work ethic, leadership and defensive tenacity to the team.

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
5:14 pm

Love to have Gortat. Watching him run the floor and do what he does for Orlando is a treat.

Again, the idea is to get ahold of these guys before 1)Everybody ELSE (including the team that currently employs them) realizes they are that good, and 2)Before they get to a better team. I’ll say it again: I’d love to have Gortat. Now what makes him want to come here (other than the Magic being stupid enough to either low-ball him, trade him, or otherwise not show their appreciation for him), from Orlando?

Just asking.

Rubio might turn out to be the hottest pg from Europe since Tony Parker. Or he might turn out like Sarunas Jasikevicius. I seem to recall that guy was widely considered, aye crowned, the best guard in all of Europe. Had better credentials than Rubio, even. Helped kick our butts in the Olympics some years back.

Bottom line: He’s on his second NBA team, and has yet to average 8 points a game in the NBA. I’m just sayin’…

But hey, we’re not drafting him, so who cares?

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
5:22 pm

Ray,

In response to your post on the last blog…I don’t have the energy to go all “lawyer” on you today. But I can’t resist giving you two good paragraphs. :)

So here goes. Come on, now, $1 million per year is a BIG difference. Every dollar you spend on a player takes you closer to luxury tax land and makes it harder to package and trade that player in later years. You say that Sund only went after Flip and Mo after Childress left. That’s true technically, but Mo signed his contract with the Hawks less than 36 hours after Childress signed with Olympiacos. Do you really think Mo’s negotiations took place in less than 2 days? Of course they not. The timing of the deal with Mo is proof that Sund knew he could get Mo for $2.5M at the time that Childress came back with a final demand for $7.5M+. And even before that “final demand” was in place, I’m sure that Sund knew roughly how much he would have to spend to keep Childress as opposed to signing Mo. And he also has been around the league long enough to know that he could then pick up a solid vet like Flip Murray (or Sam Cassell or Brent Barry, etc) for less than $2M even late in the summer. Come on…you KNOW he didn’t just scramble.

And as far as trades and other teams being interested…well, that doesn’t mean jack if Childress wasn’t interested in the other teams’ offers. Remember, we had no “rights” to trade. All we could do is work out a deal where Chill, the Hawks, and a third team ALL agreed on a deal – and that means that the other team had to be willing to poney up $7.5-8M for Chill, because Chill wasn’t going to agree to the deal otherwise. The problem last year was that NO team in the NBA was willing to shell out $7.5-8M – a good $2M above the midlevel exception – for Childress. So other teams might have been interested, but if they weren’t willing to pay Chill’s asking price, their offers weren’t worth the paper they were written on.

Michael Gearon, Jr.

May 26th, 2009
5:29 pm

Jarrett Jack is overrated.

newkid

May 26th, 2009
5:30 pm

Ray, a fatalistic ‘why would he come here’ approach is perhaps just one of the afflictions besetting the ASG over the years. If the goal is ‘Larry O’brien’ NOW (why else are we even blogging?), you certainly don’t start with ‘why would he come here’. No, you go out and give him ALL THE REASONS to say ‘YES, I’m going to the ATL and nowhere else’, and you kick the butt of any GMs seeking to beat your offer. But that’s only true if your goal is ‘Larry O’Brien’ NOW and for years to come. I wouldn’t give a single cent for a GM who’s not thinking in similar terms.

Philips Arena Hotdog Vendor

May 26th, 2009
5:35 pm

Please sign some FA’s that will put butts in seats!! If we want more commercials about our team after May, we need to sign some stars, and, no, JOE JOHNSON DOESN’T COUNT!!

Ricky Rubio

May 26th, 2009
5:36 pm

I’m SORT OF a big deal…

kwooden1

May 26th, 2009
5:37 pm

Hoops, I don’t think Denver would want to do the trade, but their going to have to do something. Klieza is a restricted FA and if they’re going to be right at the luxury tax without signing him, if he gets a good offer he’s gone and they get nothing for him.. Milwaukee’s in the same boat. Teams that are in that position, including the HAWKS with Marvin might have to make trades just to get something. We will see.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
5:39 pm

Anyone who advocates taking Douglas at #19 has gotta stop bleeding the garnet and gold. I have yet to see a draft board that has him going higher than the 5th pick of the second round. If you want him, you trade down or trade up. You don’t reach for him at #19. In any case, I’ve seen him play, and I’m not impressed. He’s a triple threat – not very big, not very fast, and not very creative. He tries hard and I like guys who leave it out there like that, but I don’t think we’re looking at the next Gilbert Arenas here. If we want him, I say we just trade our second round pick and “cash considerations” to get him.

And Sekou – Ariza did good picking off the pass in Game 1. But the one in Game 3 was not the result of anything he did. That was just a godawful pass by K-Mart, who threw it over and behind Anthony. My 10 year-old brother would have picked off that pass.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
5:47 pm

And PS – if Douglas goes all Rodney Stuckey during the pre-draft workouts and skyrockets up the draft board, then I’ll eat my words. But until then, it makes no sense to talk about taking a guy at #19 that most people think will go around #40.

UGA

May 26th, 2009
6:28 pm

Nice article.

I was hoping we would have got Wilcox last year when he was wasted to the Knicks. Charlie V would be nice with his offense and can play the 3 or 4.

How about Antonio McDyess? He fits what we’d need and he is a veteran leader.

For the draft, we can get a good player at #19. Last year, Aaron Brooks and Courtney Lee were picked late and I think anyone would love them here in ATL.

UGA

May 26th, 2009
6:37 pm

What would be nice and cap friendly:

Trade Law (I guess).
Trade the pick.
Sign our boys back!!
Sign Sessions and Wilcox (or Charlie V)

PG- Bibby and Sessions
SG- Joe, Flip and West
SF- Marvin and Mo Evans
PF- Smoove, Wilcox and Solomon Jones (he’d be cheap)
C- Big AL and ZaZa

That’s 12 and a good 12!

bballbrain

May 26th, 2009
7:01 pm

whoever it is that writes this bulls¿t about Pau Gasol coming over when he had developed his game.,.. he was 20 year old!!!!.. Scola was drafted next to last in his year… because he had a long term contract.. so i think he ent 56 and Ginobilli was drafted 57! Get a clue!

truly1

May 26th, 2009
7:29 pm

I dont like douglas at 19 just trade up in the 2nd round to get him. I say draft the best availible. Maybe someone like daye or terence williams or whoever falls because we need all 5 backup positions. drafting daye or williams you could hopefully find joe some rest. when all fails draft lenght or/and athletism. SEKOU Can you ask woody who in the draft would he give playing time to (thats the key)? you can draft dwight howard and if you dont give him playing time he will look bad.

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
7:30 pm

First lets clear cap space and let bibby 15million go trade 19pick let marvin 8million go because he will get that or more so we do a sign a trade on his deal throw in horford 4million and you have to throw in speedy the bankrobber 6million bibby 15million marvin 8million horford 4million speedy the bankrobber 6million thats 33million dollar all together then we can do somthing.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

chuckw/deadjournalist

May 26th, 2009
7:33 pm

This is my favorite time of year around the blog. For the most part, the band wagoners have gone and the die hards are sticking around. As much as I’m happy that blogs are doing well, it sucks that most of the in-season people sound like talk radio rejects.

A lot of interesting options this off season. While there are a lot of solid suggestions rolling around here (and there surely are a lot of options) the leadership void is still one that needs to be addressed. During last night’s game they were talking about how much Carmelo Anthony learned about the game when playing the Redeem Team. Even so, it took Billups to take the team to another level. The talent was there. (J.R. Smith has an amazing amount of talent even if he is one step away from falling off the cliff at any moment). The Hawks still need a few “play the right way” vets to help push this team to another level. If Flip and Bibby are not retained, it will be even more critical.

I’ve been watching the playoffs this year with more interest than in recent years. What struck me this year is the constitution of the teams. Both in construction and in fortitude. Watching the conference finals shines a light on the deficiencies of the Hawks roster. From the depth of veteran bench talent to the ability to get up off the deck when falling behind early. But mainly the consistent and relentless energy the winning teams have had throughout the game.

I’m one of the many that love the energy that Mario West brings to the team – and I mean no disrespect to Rio – but there should be bench players with much more basketball talent filling the roll of energizers and defensive stoppers on the roster. And with the athletes on the team, they should be moving constantly.

Yes, the team needs a defensive, slashing point guard. Yes, they need a low-post scoring option off the bench. Yes, they need a shut-down wing. I think they’d also do well by adding a jump-shooting big man that could spread the floor. But what they really need is to find all-out player who play hard and play smart.

The hardest thing to do is improve when you’re already good. The Hawks were good but still have a lot of room for improvement.

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
7:37 pm

Trade marvin horford and speedy and the 19pick for bosh i gurantee that raptors would take that deel knowing that bosh will be gone after the year 2010.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

cp

May 26th, 2009
7:39 pm

I was shocked when Law wasn’t moved around the trade deadline. It was clear he was not apart of Woodsons plans. If you go back and look at his rookie year he was playing well until he got hurt in that Bobcats game. After that he never seemed to be the same. The problem I had with the situation is that we played guys like Lue and Aj over Law even when he came back healthy. He still wasn’t getting pt even when guys got hurt. It made no sense to me. That was the best time to groom the kid. I just hope we don’t trade him and he ends up blossoming somewhere else and we end up saying how we blew another pick on someone who plays better when they left…. I have been on the Bass bandwagon all summer. I would love to have him on this team… I see Sund taking Mullens. I’m willing to bet Mullings will be a work out warrior and might even move up on the draft board… Guys like Terrence Williams and Sam Young are also nice prospects to look at. I would rather have Williams. He can play the 2 and 3. Has long arms, can handle the rock, and rebounds like a big man. He is also very athletic.

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
7:42 pm

Woody is going to have to be patient with acie and let him develop like doc was patient with rondo.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

truly1

May 26th, 2009
7:45 pm

so i guess you agree with me CP about the draft and I agree with you about acie law

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
7:49 pm

The hawks 2009 team
starters ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH.
BENCH FLIP, MOE, FREE AGENT HAKIM WARRICK, SOLO, ZAZA.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
7:53 pm

Horford should be untouchable unless LeBron, Dwight Howard, CP3, Deron Williams, or a comparably unattainable player is on the other side of the deal. I count Amare and Bosh as borderline in that category. The point is that Horford is our most untouchable player due to the combination of his current production, upside, reasonable price tag, and intangible qualities that he brings. I know Clyde still hates on him, but we’d be insane to give Horford up in exchange for anything less than a surefire, healthy franchise player.

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
8:03 pm

nire,

co-sign

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
8:08 pm

Niremental i like horford to but you have to give up something to get something i say keep josh and joe and build around them 2 i guess you disagree with me you have to choose between josh or horford?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
8:14 pm

TO line up 1st team ACIE, JOE, CHILL, HORFORD, BOSH.
line up 2nd team ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH.
i like 2nd team better.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
8:32 pm

Niremetal,

FYI – Chad Ford has Toney at #26

doc

May 26th, 2009
8:34 pm

chuck, nice laundry list there. i like the idea of what it takes philosophically to put the team together rather than naming individuals. way too many names to plug in but we can certainly talk in contextual terms.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
8:36 pm

I definitely like the first team better. If we have Bosh, we need a tough 1-on-1 post defender. Josh is a great help defender but he doesn’t have the patience or strength to play on-ball post defense as well as Horford can.

doc

May 26th, 2009
8:37 pm

i guess sautee someone else thinks he is a first rounder. the way nire describes douglas it sounds like a young bibby. heh heh

ring me up blood.

doc

May 26th, 2009
8:39 pm

horford is untouchable no matter what sund says if only for salary vs return on that invetment..

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
9:01 pm

Poor Anthony Johnson. Looks like the refs have it in for him tonight.

Turns his back on Mo and gets tapped with the ball in the back and SOMEHOW that’s a foul. More pro-Cavs B.S.

David Stern

May 26th, 2009
9:02 pm

I will do everything in my power to get Lebron to the finals

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
9:06 pm

Sautee,

At this point last year, Ford had Brook Lopez going #3, DeAndre Jordan going #14, and…well, I’ll just let you read the damned thing:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?columnist=ford_Chad&page=MockDraft-080520

The next time I put 10 cents worth of stock into anything published by an ESPN writer will be the first.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
9:09 pm

But point taken – SOMEone has him going in the first round :)

Jiminy Cricket

May 26th, 2009
9:09 pm

Even if it means personally sucking his dick?

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
9:09 pm

So when LeBron complains, he’s being competitive, but when Josh complains he’s a selfish whiner. Makes sense to me.

RealSquawk

May 26th, 2009
9:12 pm

I really miss Acie.
I wish he would stay and play 30 minutes a game.

I hope we don’t lose Flip.
I do wish we would part ways with Mo.
I hope we can bring chill back.

I think Randolph Morris would have been a great offensive weapon.
I have to agree that Solo is not effective, but its not his fault.
I hope David Anderson finds his way onto this roster.
And in Woody’s good graces.
I hope Zaza loves Atlanta as much as we love him.

I want Salim Stoudamire to play well next season.
I want Royal Ivey to play well.
I want Acie to play well in a hawks uniform so Woody doesn’t feel too bad.

And for the finale!!!
The only difference between Mike Brown and Mike Woodson is Lebron James and Joe Johnson respectively.

darrell starks

May 26th, 2009
9:13 pm

Yes your right about josh i think thats one of his weakness but josh has the potential and the gift to be something special by him going from high school to the pro have hurt him a lot on learning some ove the fundamental of basketball and 1 is learning how to position your self when it comes to rebounding but i would rather face horford on another team than josh just because of his potential it could be scary.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
9:17 pm

Nire,

Wasn’t trying to make a point. Personally I see Toney somewhat like Mateen Cleaves. Physically strong guy who was a beast in his last collegiate year, but may be a step slow for the pros.

I DO like his defensive toughness, but I’d worry about him guarding anybody with serious “quicks”. Which, of course, he’ll have to do at this level.

But what do I know? I thought Dahntay Jones was a step slow, too and he’s doing just fine. Glad I’m not a GM.

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
9:20 pm

Niremetal,

I think you gave/giving Sund far too much credit with your 5:22 post. The Hawks front office clearly admit that Olympiacos deal caught them off guard. And I recalled Childress agent stated there were other teams interested in Chillz and it was reported that the Suns had a S&T deal on the table. So for you to say teams must have been scared off by his asking price is an assumption by you to back your theory. Sund was blind side by the Olympiacos contract and try to make amends by offering a mid-level contract (b/c he thought he had all the leverage). Chillz declined and flew the coop. As for Mo Evans, I don’t think were a ton of teams knocking down his door to sign him as he was brought into the picture after the Chillz fiasco. Bottomline, Sund over played his hand and sign Mo Evans as damage control but it was Flip who bail him out of his terrible offseason. If Sund was such a genious, he would have signed Flip for 3yrs and given Mo the 1 yr contract…

See link as exhibit #1:
http://nba.fanhouse.com/2008/07/23/atlantas-sund-delivers-a-simply-awful-response-to-childress-goi/

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
9:24 pm

Sautee, cosign the 9:09 post….

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
9:35 pm

Fun to watch the Magic get 3-point happy just like our team. They simply stop looking for the two-point bucket and just fire from deep.

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
9:36 pm

Every time LeBron does ANYTHING, Marv Albert sounds like he’s gonna lose his load in his pants. Sickening.

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
9:38 pm

In fact, what the conference finals have reminded me is that every team has warts. And every coach, too.

Long Dong Silver

May 26th, 2009
9:39 pm

Jiminy Cricket: so-sign.

Long Dong Silver

May 26th, 2009
9:39 pm

My bad “co-sign.”

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
9:39 pm

Melvin,

Nowhere have I ever seen the Hawks front office “clearly admit” or even impliedly admit that the Olympiacos signing caught them off-guard. The link you posted says nothing remotely suggesting that. And so what if another team had an S&T deal on the table? Odds are that such a trade probably offered Atlanta little-to-nothing or that they didn’t pay Chill what Olympiacos would

I don’t think you, Ray, or anyone else can contend with a straight face that Rick Sund had no clue what Childress’s agents were asking for. Of course he knew. He thought the Hawks would be better off letting Childress go to Europe for a year or two, saving $7M+, and signing Mo and a vet. And you know what? It looks like he was right. Because we won 47 games this year while spending just $4M on Flip/Mo AND we still the retain the right to match any/all offers for Chill this summer.

Marv Albert

May 26th, 2009
9:40 pm

OH MY GOD, THAT SHOT GIVES THE CAVS A ONE-POINT LEAD!!!!!!!!

*head explodes*

Atlanta Hawks Front Office

May 26th, 2009
9:42 pm

The Olympiakos signing caught us off guard.

So did Joe Johnson getting…tired.

Marv Albert

May 26th, 2009
9:43 pm

*can’t talk right now, his mouth is full…of Lebron*

O'brien

May 26th, 2009
9:50 pm

Zaza made $4 mil last year, and I assume he expects a raise ($5-$6 mil maybe). Gortat made $700k, and he also expects a raise. I think Gortat could be signed from Orlando (for a little less than what Zaza would get, maybe $4-$5 mil). Remember, Orlando still has to pay Tony Battie $5.7 mil.

Question: If we have a choice between Zaza and Gortat from Orlando (I dont think we can afford both), who would you take? Personally, I would take Gortat because he is better defensively, and is not a turnover waiting to happen. Although he is not the offensive rebounder Zaza is. But if we get a shooting big man like Charlie V, Gortat would be my choice.

cp

May 26th, 2009
10:00 pm

I actually think the Suns offered us Barbosa for Chills. I remember reading that. Barbosa is not a point guard so we all know Woody would have tried to make him a point guard. I cant lie I would have liked Barbosa on this team. He is a scorer and in the playoffs we lacked scoring.

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
10:04 pm

If Sund decides that he wants a PG from ths draft, he needs to trade up to grab one of the top 7 PGs (Rubio, Jennings, Curry, Holiday, Flynn, Lawson & Maynor). After that, I think there is a drop-off to the next tier including Teague, Calathes, Collison, Mills and Douglas. And I think that Sund should target the Suns at #14. 76ers will likely target a PG and if the T’Wolves pass up on one with their first pick, they will surely take a look at one with their second 1st round pick. The Hawks need to get in front of both of those teams. Would the rights to Andersen and the 19th pick get us up 5 spots? Suns always have financial issues so dropping back saves them some money and if they don’t want Andersen this year, they can keep him in Europe until they are ready to bring him over.

One more thng on ths Douglas deal, there are several teams choosing AFTER the Hawks that need a PG also. Mavs, Kings (if they don’t one early but they likely will) and Blazers could all take a shot at Douglas. I don’t see a big difference between one PB-needy team choosing Douglas at 19 vs. a different PG-needy team selecting him at 21.

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
10:06 pm

Nire,

About this: “Because we won 47 games this year while spending just $4M on Flip/Mo AND we still the retain the right to match any/all offers for Chill this summer.”

Which is worth what? If Chills doesn’t WANT to come back here, are we not behind the 8 ball? What is the positive in that scenario?

doc

May 26th, 2009
10:09 pm

real as i was hearing chuck and kenny criticizing brown for his handling of the bench, its roles and keeping them primed by playing them for some regular minutes i was thinking the same thing. then i read your remark at 9:12.

melvin, yup flip for three but he was rescued as an after thought from russia wasnt it? mo had to be talked out of going somewhere else as he was rumored to be signed by someone else, houston i think but i guess they had to promise him an extra year to get him. if you remember i saidbefore the fact that the agents of josh and chillls need to be creative and look elsewhere. if i could see it coming why didnt sund and the hawks’ basg. it is even more embarrasisng to give the idea they were caught blind sided. it only points to their arrogance in playing their hand too hard. i would have preferred them saying we gave a good offer and low and behold chills did himself proud by shopping it over seas and stealing money from the russians in greece in eruos. that would have meant they were proactive. overall i still have my concerns about sund and will watch how they handle this year as it is a lot more complicated than last year when they only had to deal with two moving parts and almost fumbled that one. the jury is still out.

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
10:10 pm

Niremetal,

Sund surely knew what Childress’ agents wanted, but he did NOT see that Olympiacos offer coming. Sorry, but I’m not swallowing that one. If he did, then why bother making that offer that was “well above the MLE?” By the way, I never said, or even insinuated that Sund had no clue what Chills and his agents wanted. I don’t which bodily orifice you pulled THAT one from.

I agree that there is a sufficient lack of proof, and quite a dose of speculation on both sides of the argument. By the way, why would the Hawks front office admit that they were blindsided by the Olympiacos offer? Give me a break…

Mo Evans was trying to get to Golden State. They balked, Sund swooped in. Flip Murray was headed to Russia. Yes, this was very easy for Sund, as both guys were looking for jobs, and not finding them in preferred places.

Now what you do seem to insinuate is that Sund knew Olympiacos was going to make the offer, and that he planned to let Chills go across the pond and save the cash. Funny, I never saw a report where Sund admitted to that, either. But hey, you’re right. He’s a genius. We won 47 games, and that proves it, right?

By that logic, everything Woody did was right on the money with everything HE did, as well…I mean, 47 games has to be all the proof one needs to see this. Ah yes, life is a two-way street with no stop signs…

Heh.

pound4pound

May 26th, 2009
10:11 pm

Sekou – thanks for stopping by the squawk.

The only way this team improves its record is by acquiring a Center. Our offense will never change with Woody at the helm. The go-Joe Offense is what it is and it is here to stay. If we can get someone who won’t get pushed around in the middle – then we can improve our interior defense and rebounding. If NO wants to get rid of Tyson Chandler so badly then we should take him off of their hands for one of our forwards and filler. Ditto for Chris Kaman after LAC take Griffin.

Something tells me that we are going to have Flip Murry as our starting point guard next season. I’m okay with that if we put someone over 7 foot in the paint.

Flip
Joe
Marvin
Josh
Chandler

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
10:15 pm

Nire,

For Sund sake he better keep his fingers cross that a team doesn’t call his bluff and offer Chillz above MLE contract (especially if its front loaded) b/c that would be the same cause that he tried to avoid which sent Chillz to Europe. Uh, how many teams will be under the cap in 2010 again??? Yes, he’s taking a tactical gamble with house money…..

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
10:17 pm

doc,

“the jury is still out.”

Big co-sign

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
10:21 pm

Astro Joe,

I understand the premise behind players that play hurt, and those that don’t. I wonder what was going on in Acie’s mind, where that was concerned. Acie had decent minutes when all Woody had to work with was Lue, AJ, and Speedy in a suit. However, when he got Bibby (an obvious upgrade), Acie got very little burn when he came back from injury. Then Acie shows out in preseason, and Flip is added to the roster during the offseason. Acie was healthy, and got very little burn. What he got was inconsistent. I wonder. Just how motivated would I feel to play hurt when I couldn’t get much playing time while fully healthy? Woody lamented the fact that Acie wasn’t around to play when he Bibby was out, and Flip was the only option. Well….I don’t know what to say. It really doesn’t matter at this point, and I don’t care. Just ship the guy out for somebody who WILL play (and will GET to play), hurt or not. Somebody who can gain the confidence and respect of teammates and coaches alike.

By the way, you’re right. Every team and it’s coach DOES have warts. Some just have bigger warts, and more of them. Some have fewer and less heinous ones. ;)

AL

May 26th, 2009
10:25 pm

Whats the purpose of drafting a point guard when the coach is not going to develop him. He has already killed to good guards Salim and Acie. The bench we have mite work if he played them through the years to see what we have.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
10:26 pm

Ray,

The “no clue” comment was directed more at Mel, who seems quite convinced that the Hawks were caught totally off-guard by the Olympiakos deal. I guess we can agree to disagree. I do think that Sund might have thought Chill was bluffing about Greece (after all, no other American player of his caliber had ever bolted across the pond), but he surely knew two things 1) that Chill was not going to come back for $6.5M or less; and 2) that the Hawks could get better than Chill for that $6.5M.

And I don’t see anyone can say with a straight face that Mo was a panic signing. I’m not saying that you’re explicitly saying that, but you KNOW that we would not have signed Mo if we had re-signed Chills. The Mo deal was concluded within 36 hours after Chill signed with Greece. NO contract is signed that quickly in the NBA. That deal was at least a few days in the making. That means that unless you’re contending that Mo was a panic signing, Sund had made a conscious decision BEFORE the Childress signing that Chill was asking for too much and that the Hawks were better off paying $2.5M for Mo than paying more than $7M for Chill.

The comparison with Woody is a non-sequiter. I don’t pull this out too often, but I said in August that we were a better team with Flip and Mo than we would have been with Chill. There’s a REASON Chill went to Europe – if you look at what you can get for his price tag, most teams will be better off signing 2-3 solid veterans at $2-2.5M/yr than they would be paying Chill $7M. I’m not saying Childress is a bad player. Just that he doesn’t do any one thing particularly great. That’s why it was the best thing for both Childress and for the Hawks to let him go to Europe.

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
10:27 pm

The freakin’ refs WILL get Howard gone. More B.S.

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
10:28 pm

Melvin,

I’m considering Childress a lost asset, until proven otherwise. I don’t care what anybody says about it, the fact is that we’re not in the best position with him. I say he’s out of the picture. Niremetal has surely worked hard enough to make sure everybody knows we don’t have any rights to him. What else can you call it?

As far as I’m concerned, it’s Bibby that Sund has to be wary of playing too much of a poker game with. Bibby can go where he wants as a UFA. At this point, you can talk about money, but what if Bibby wants to win a championship next year or the year after? He’s not going to do it here. All he has to do is take a paycut to go elsewhere. Not only that, but he could go someplace where he would have less responsibility. All speculation, but no less so than any assumptions that is a lock to return here, and for just the right money. But whatever…Sund is the GM.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
10:28 pm

Mel,

You’re right that we’re screwed if some team is stupid enough to throw $9M/yr at Childress next year. But despite repeated posts here to the contrary, I think he’ll be a restricted free agent next summer as well, assuming we make a qualifying offer. I don’t think there’s a time limit on how long the Hawks get to hold his rights, or at least I’ve never seen a legit news organization that has said as much (and Larry Coon won’t answer my damned emails asking him about that!).

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
10:30 pm

Ray,

We don’t have any TRADEABLE rights to him. We do have the right to match all NBA teams’ offers for him, which is very valuable – it means that as long as no other team values Childress significantly more than the Hawks do, we can keep him here (or else force the other team to work out a sign-and-trade with us). That’s a valuable right. It’s just not one that we are allowed to trade.

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
10:34 pm

Nire,

But as I said, if Chills DOESN’T want to come here, then exactly what is that worth?

Astro Joe

May 26th, 2009
10:34 pm

Ray, Mario West stayed ready. I’m not saying that waiting is easy, but goodness, what else did he need to do but sit there and be ready?

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
10:42 pm

Sautee,

In that case, it’s worth nothing. But what would you rather have us do? Re-sign him for a price he isn’t worth? I’m just waiting to hear a suggestion for a feasible alternative about what we could have done with Childress that would have made the team better.

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
10:45 pm

Astro Joe,

That’s why I said that I wondered what was going on in his head. He didn’t seem to have a bad attitude (at least he didn’t make faces like Salim did).

Mario West? Tell you what, I wish more guys had his attitude and drive. But let’s be real, at the same time. Acie Law: slated to be a lottery pick. Mario West: was not expected to make it in the league.

Glad he did make it, and love to see him play when he does. As for Acie, I don’t have the answers. That’s why I said, “ship him.” And hope Sund’s poker game goes better with Bibby and Flip than it has with other guys.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
10:45 pm

Aaaaaaaaand good night! Go Magic!

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
10:51 pm

Sautee,

That would seem to be the question, would it not? Unfortunately, the answer is both obvious and inconvenient. I consider him a lost asset between two GMs: the one who picked him, and the one who let him go. Geez, I’m glad we didn’t pick Iguodala or Deng instead….

Niremetal,

I know the answer to that question. There is no answer that you would judge feasible, and the fact is, we are too far in the corner, looking at fresh paint. I doubt he’ll come back to this team, as we will likely not match any offers that we weren’t willing to come up with in the first place. You said it yourself: we won 47 games, and that proves that he wasn’t needed. Right? I mean, Mo Evans came up BIG when Marvin was out.

I’ll say it again: lost asset. Time to move on.

doc

May 26th, 2009
10:54 pm

has anyone seen that smirk on the popcorn man lorens recently?

if i were woody i would have that scene on the wide screen tv in the locker room to start fall practice and have it run for about 20 straight minutes to get my point across then do good player and bad player clips for each player to define what was expected. after that i wouldnt show it until the queen and her court come back again. i guess their lack of class is one of the reasons i soured on them. go magic!

Big Ray

May 26th, 2009
10:55 pm

Gee, Pietrus looks kinda good, even if he’s jacking errant 3s. Defends Lebron fairly well at times. Huh. Wonder why Orlando let ol’ Mo Evans go? I mean, damn, he was a STARTER! Gee, I guess you CAN mess with the top half of your rotation and get better. Hmmmmm.

Heh

Heh

Heh….

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
11:00 pm

Ray,

co-sign that

Heh

Heh

Heh

Mike is back

May 26th, 2009
11:06 pm

I love watching LBJ…but its total BS the way Ref have so much impact on the game the CAVs play. That last flagrant foul on DHoward was pathetic…then LBJ plows in Peatrus and no foul call.

Its hard to imagine why the Cavs ever loose a game.

On the upcoming draft…Given Woody history with young PGs…why do you even take the gamble…I don’t see Woody letting a young PG run his team. I like some of the FA Bigs that have been mentioned.

I think if you are serious about adding some balance go get Camby and Gortat. Both guys should be just as affordable as Bibby.

cp

May 26th, 2009
11:08 pm

If I remember correctly, Mo was about to sign with the Warriors then the news about Chills broke. The Hawks offered Mo more years and money than the Warriors so he balked at the Warriors deal and accepted the Hawks deal.

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:11 pm

What is Orlando doing? Why didn’t they call timeout to drawup a play????

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:14 pm

Why is Orlando trying to inbound the ball against Lebron? Lebron can step over the line a slap the inbounder and the refs wont call foul…

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:16 pm

Big shot by Lewis although it wasn’t the highest percentage of shots… falling out of bounds for 3…. Lets hope Lebron don’t get one of those phanthom fouls…

Mike is back

May 26th, 2009
11:19 pm

THAT WAS THE WORST CALL OF THE PLAYOFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:19 pm

My gosh… what a terrible call on the Magic.

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
11:21 pm

That was the worst pair of calls I have ever seen in my entire life.

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:21 pm

Man them refs may not make it out of Orlando tonight….

Lebron James

May 26th, 2009
11:23 pm

Listen I told the referees I was going to run at the basket and fall down and you are going to blow the whistle and they did and they will always do it cause I am Lebron.

I told them they are going throw a lob and they will not blow a whistle no matter what.

You see how they are not replaying in anymore right?

I am Lebron.

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
11:24 pm

Would that have been a no call if it was LeBron going for that lob?

B.S.

That’s the most contact I’ve EVER seen on a no call. The league is gonna have some ’splainin’ to do, methinks. Was that not MUCH more egrigious than Fisher on Barry?

This is freakin’ WWE!

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:24 pm

Stern may get what he wants with a LA/Cavs Finals but what if the ratings are low b/c people don’t want to see a product when the results are rig….

gusman354

May 26th, 2009
11:24 pm

THE REFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:26 pm

Could TNT please get rid of Doug Collins on the broadcast. It makes no sense how much he rides Lebron and the Cavs jocks…

Lebron James

May 26th, 2009
11:27 pm

These body checks that Varejho continues to commit would be fouls if he was playing with Joe Johnson.

Mike is back

May 26th, 2009
11:27 pm

NO THAT WAS THE WORST CALL OF THE PLAYOFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’M GOING TO BED…NO WAY THE REF LET THE MAGIC WIN THIS GAME…THIS GAME IS A DISGRACE TO NBA FANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

niremetal

May 26th, 2009
11:31 pm

Varejao finally gets called for his sixth foul then runs at the ref when it’s called. Didn’t Zaza get double T’d and ejected for the same thing against the Cavs?

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:31 pm

Superman……

RealSquawk

May 26th, 2009
11:33 pm

Lebron is great, but if you can’t win this game with refs on your inside like this then how great are you really?

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
11:33 pm

LOL, Varejao’s sixth foul was actually on LeBron, but they HAD to call something!

And lord knows they wouldn’t call it on the Chosen One.

doc

May 26th, 2009
11:36 pm

bs turk not fouled and queen was?

at least turk was going at the basket which they stopped doing at the end of regulation.

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:38 pm

Superman….

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
11:39 pm

Will wonders never cease. Jump ball. No foul.

O'brien

May 26th, 2009
11:41 pm

niremetal, I could be wrong, but I think I read somewhere that if a player leaves to go overseas, he will be restricted only for 2 years. After that, he in unrestricted. I havent done any research on it, so I could be wrong. Sekou, could you confirm or deny how long the Hawks will have control over Chills as a restricted free agent?

As good as the Hawks were, I think we would have been even better with Mo Evans, Flip and Chills. That way, Mo would be our backup SG, and Chills would be our backup SF.

RealSquawk

May 26th, 2009
11:41 pm

There were two good no calls

RealSquawk

May 26th, 2009
11:42 pm

O’Brien I think the hawks only hold the rights to Childress for two years anyway cause he was restricted so that was this year and next year.
If you were referring to him. not sure.

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:46 pm

If Lebron is the Anointed one then let us all be a witness to him bringing his team back from a 3-1 deficit to win this series…

Mike is back

May 26th, 2009
11:46 pm

I HAD TO STAY UP TO WATCH LBJ AND HIS BOYS GO DOWN 3-1…WHO WOULD HAVE THUNK IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Heh heh

Sautee

May 26th, 2009
11:47 pm

‘night all

Melvin

May 26th, 2009
11:48 pm

I willing to bet you that Howard (and two other Magic starters) is going to foul out Thursday night.

RealSquawk

May 26th, 2009
11:48 pm

Lebron almost hit that, it was very scary and I was very scared.

Sekou Smith

May 26th, 2009
11:52 pm

It might be time for the folks in Cleveland to come to the realization that they simply are not going to solve this Magic team. Watching the Cavs run under those screens (allowing Howard to run to his sweet spots in the lane untouched while those 6-10 shooters decide if they want to shoot over the defense or wait on the big fella) has me worn slap out tonight. I’m baffled as to why the Cavaliers never adjusted to that. The Denver-Orlando NBA Finals is a few games away from reality. Maybe then they’ll kill all these Nike sponsored promos for the Kobe-LeBron Finals.

Nike Marketing Department

May 27th, 2009
12:05 am

It’s time we sent a few “representatives” to pay a visit to the National Basketball Referees Association. Apparently they don’t remember our little “agreement.”

Dick Bavetta's Sagging Boobs

May 27th, 2009
12:07 am

Enter your comments here

darrell starks

May 27th, 2009
12:27 am

I dont care if you are a super star its is so hard to win and nba title by your self and i dont think mo william can be that complement player to lebron.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

kirkinga

May 27th, 2009
12:37 am

Sautee, don’t even get me started about long comments being eaten..sheesh!

I’m past frustrated and on to disgusted with this move. Fire the fracking dude already and let’s move on. Yeah 1-year remaining, but 1-year for a 10-game and 1-playoff round improvement? That’s total b.s.

I’m also not sure how Sund could micromanage minutes when he doesn’t know what the team is going o look like! If the mix of players are TBD how can you make demands on how the roster is used?

I guess I don’t blame Woodson for taking a salary in this bad economy, otherwise he’s a total wuss for not quitting.

I get what you’re saying, really I do, but all you’re argument just shifts the blame to ASG! So let me make it clear that even though I generally supported how things went last offseason, I’m not blindly loyal.

The Hawks aren’t going to the ECF as presently constructed. Until they can play inside and out, they aren’t getting past the teams that finished ahead of them.

Funny how a legit big man (though no superstar on the level of Kobe, LeBron, or Wade) can suddenly disrupt the Cav’s world…but I digress.

I just see the job of adding quality players made harder because we have a “coaching situation”. And that situation will be a distraction…a fracking self-inflicted distraction…from the first day of camp until there’s a resolution.

This puts a damper on the offseason. Sund, and ASG, had better get it right as there really is very little margin for error and they’ve already started to test that margin

Ray, I would agree with you that Childress is a non assest at the moment, but he is a payroll drag and that’s the other part of his equation. Can we get Manny T or some other cap expert to confirm we can’t trade his rights? That doesn’t sound correct, though it may be.

Go Hawks!!

freshd

May 27th, 2009
12:53 am

Sekou, I blogged last week on MARK BRADLEY”S blog that the HAWKS should draft TONEY DOUGLAS or DARREN COLLISON at point guard, and he wanted the HAWKS to draft ERIC MAYNOR. DOUGLAS game is a little like D-WADE, he has a NBA body and he can create his own shot and get to the basket.

Najeh Davenpoop

May 27th, 2009
12:54 am

About the Magic-Cavs game… are y’all really serious about the refs? If the Magic stand around on the perimeter all day jacking up 3’s they can’t expect to draw foul calls. It’s not going to happen. I thought the no-call on Varejao at the end of the game was an excellent call… if anything the foul was on Howard for hooking Varejao’s arm. The call LeBron drew right before that could have gone either way. The refs have been the one weak spot of this otherwise spectacular playoffs, but I didn’t see anything specific they did tonight that was so bad.

It’s looking pretty bleak for the Cavs though, and I think more than anyone else, so-called All Star Mo Williams and so-called Coach of the Year Mike Brown are being exposed as the frauds they are. Mo Williams is pretty useless when his shot is not falling, and Mike Brown’s iso-Bron offense and unwillingness to adjust on defense are eerily reminiscent of Woody.

About Villanueva possibly being a Hawk: I think the Hawks would have to seriously overpay him to be able to pry him away from the Bucks since he’s a restricted free agent. As much as his scoring punch off the bench would be nice, I don’t think the Hawks will be able to get him at a reasonable price. Pietrus got almost the entire mid-level from Orlando and Villanueva would probably command the same… would Villanueva be worth the same, knowing that unlike PIetrus he would only contribute on one end of the floor?

One last thing… I was looking at the NBA salaries page on hoopshype, trying to find some free agent big men this offseason… and it turns out Boston, which has $72 million in salary on the books for next year, is looking at both Leon Powe and Glen Davis entering unrestricted free agency. Chances are re-signing Davis is a priority for them, after his playoff performance, but with Powe coming off an injury he may not only be expendable but may also come cheap due to the injury issue. That’s a guy the Hawks could probably pick up on the cheap if they tried.

darrell starks

May 27th, 2009
12:58 am

I say bring in avery and dont waste another year because this is a crucial situation for this franchise because as we all no if your not a team on the rise in the ATL fans will loose entrance in a hard beat and they will loose at lot of money at the box office but since rick sund say keep woody i will support him hoping that he change his style of coaching.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

niremetal

May 27th, 2009
1:04 am

If the Hawks are smart, they’ll offer a full mid-level deal to Session or Charlie V, whoever they’d prefer, and then quickly follow that up with a full mid-level offer to the other if the Bucks match on the first. No way the Bucks pay ~$11.5M total to keep both, since that would place them into luxury cap land – and their GM idiotically tipped his hand by saying they aren’t willing to do that.

The Hawks should still have the bi-annual exception in their back pocket after that, which they could use to pick up another rotation player (the exception will be fore $2M or so this year). Do that and then re-sign Marvin, Flip, and Bibby for less than $20M total (probably $8M/5yr Marvin, $7M/3yr Bibby, and $4M/2yr Flip), and you’ve greatly improved the team while only increasing the payroll by $5M.

doc

May 27th, 2009
1:06 am

kirk we have switched positions, you sound about as militant and strident as i did last year talking about how they were botching it with the josh’s. you just said we can wait this one out and all will be well. why the change of heart since woody has already survived one lame duck situation where the gm tried to fire him? werent you saying sund was pretty smooth the way he was handling things? just checking and why the worry so quickly now since we only have a team of three legit players fortunately the top three which will be who we build around.

also chills doesnt cost us a thing, how can he be a payroll drag, you dont expect the basg to pay uot that much in real dollars do you? man your expectations have really gone up here since the season ended. did you have a illness or something?

darrell starks

May 27th, 2009
1:08 am

I hope rick sund no what he is doing or its going to be a long year for the hawks remember all of the other team who where injuried most of the year will be stronger this year NETS, WIZARDS, BUCKS, BOBCATS, BULLS, SIXERS, PACERS, so lets see will we go forward or take a step back time will tell rick sund.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Najeh Davenpoop

May 27th, 2009
1:12 am

Other unrestricted free agents who may be pretty affordable and would fill key needs for the Hawks: Wally Szczerbiak, Brandon Bass, Dahntay Jones, Antonio McDyess, Steve Novak, Chris Wilcox, Marcin Gortat, Drew Gooden, and Anthony Parker.

There are others — like Glen Davis, Trevor Ariza, Ramon Sessions, Paul Millsap, and Chris Andersen — who would also clearly improve this team, but I don’t think it’s likely the Hawks can get them without overpaying, considering their performances this year and/or their current value to their teams. And there are still others — like Adonal Foyle, Jamario Moon, and Rasho Nesterovic — who would probably come pretty cheap but wouldn’t make a significant impact. And of course there are players like Ben Gordon who would be completely out of the Hawks’ price range.

Restricted free agents, generally speaking, are going to require overpaying since the offering team has to find a way to design a contract that the current team won’t match. So although it’s possible that the Hawks can get guys like Jarrett Jack and Charlie Villanueva, it’s not a smart course of action to rely on such acquisitions in my opinion.

O'brien

May 27th, 2009
1:15 am

doc, Chills might be a payroll drag if the Hawks dont trade him or sign him, because the Hawks will make an offer to him (to guarantee that we still own his restricted rights). If I’m not mistaken, whatver we offer him will count towards the salary cap, even if he stays in Greece.

I agree that the Hawks can get either Sessions or Charlie V (although I dont know if Woody would want Sessions because he is not a good 3 point shooter). If the Hawks lose out on Sessions, they could get Jarret Jack.

RealSquawk

May 27th, 2009
1:29 am

doc,
I think Childress counts against our cap as long as we have his restricted rights.

HawkKingBibby

May 27th, 2009
1:40 am

SEKOU SEKOU SEKOU Thanks for answering ? of the Hawksquawkers. Can you give some more info on Smooves trade kicker like how much is it and why it makes it hard to do a trade with Smoove involved? I dont want Smoove traded but with a name like Bosh possibly on the block I get excited.

kirkinga

May 27th, 2009
2:40 am

doc..oh now you admit to sounding strident and militantlast offseason….lol!

So yes, strident fits, though it’s more disappointment. See there is a big difference between this offseason and last:

1. More moving parts.

2. Last season Sund was largely unfamiliar with the players and coaches, but now has had plenty of time for a seasoned GM to know what he needs to know in order to make a proper evaluation.

3.I applauded the short-lease 2-year extension if you recall. Now after a 10-game improvement and 1-playoff round improvement, either the guy deserves to stay or he is not part of the vision for this basketball team.

Unless it was a mutual decision,

4. I believe last season the new players came into a stable situation once the Joshes situations were resolved. Now no matter the makeup of the roster, there will be a parallel story of what lie ahead for the Head Coach. The team didn’t have to play with such drama this season.

Now as for Chills, he does indeed count on the payroll. I could be mistaken of course, but I could swear we talked about this last offseason as some argued that ASG was so cheap that there was no way they keep the rights to Chills because it was dead payroll.

So no, my friend, no illness. It’s still all about winning and everything else is b.s. This indecision is more likely to inhibit rather than promote wins therefore my agitation.

Personally, I would fire Coach Woodson(assuming I wasn’t sure about a role for him in the future) and place a call to Jeff Van Gundy. Annoying commentator, but excellent coach.

Go Hawks!!

PerfectSwagger

May 27th, 2009
3:03 am

After watching the hawks get swept in the Playoffs by Cleveland, it was apparent that they lacked two things, Consistent inside scoring, and a running mate to Help Joe Johnson, my opinion is that Johnson plays to many Minutes during the regular season,in order for them to take there game to another level they must get a legit running mate for Joe Johnson,Smith is good but not great, or if they keep smith and Johnson together they must find players that can do what Smith can’t such as shoot the basketball, as far as the Draft I feel that they must go point guard in the first round, they made the dumb mistake of passing up on Chris Paul three years ago,i think that they don’t need to make the same mistake again being this is a point guard heavy draft with lots of tallent. some suggestions: Ty Lawson, Eric Manor, Tony Douglass, free agent: Jarrett Jack. these i think would be people that can come in and make an impact right away. The second thing they must address is the front line, they need some one that can consistantly score inside and grab rebounds, my suggestion would be to trade Josh smith and Al Horford for Chris Bosh, this will give you two things, give the hawks the Superstar they need to pair with Joe Johnson and give the Hawks the inside scoring/rebounding/defender they need to keep up with the Celtics/Cavs/Magic. I’m tired of mediocraty in the hawks, do you know the Hawks have never drafted an all star EVER. that is a shame i think the Hawks leadership owe it to the fans to stop being cheap and try and bring a championship to the Atlanta area, because its long over do.I atleast want to see them compeat for one title before i die and right now i’m only 26 so. and i’m a die hard hawks fan so I want to see them succeed. Go Hawks!!!!!!

PerfectSwagger

May 27th, 2009
3:20 am

PS: I for got bring Josh Childress back to,he was a good defender and a solid player, with Marvin Williams starting and Childress as the 6th Man the Small forward/Shooting Guard spot would be solidified.just think of a potintial startng line-up of. Jarrett Jack, Joe Johnson, Marvin Williams, Chris Bosh,and Zaza Pachulia,with a bench of Josh Childress, Flip Murry,Solo Jones. and notable draft picks!!!! Sounds like a championship contending team to me. PSS do something with ACE LAW. if your gonna keep him play him he is a good player that no body knows about, or trade him while he still has some value. do somethin with him. why draft Teague from Wake Forest, when you got Ace Law, there the same player. Law Has more up side though in my opinion. he was a star at A&M, make him a star in the NBA, all he needs is for someone to build his confidence. ok lol, i’ve said enough.

PerfectSwagger

May 27th, 2009
3:27 am

I like avery Johnson as our Coach to, Woody is good but I dont know if he can get us to the next level, he has good defensive schemes, but his offense sucks, all they do is give it to Joe and watch him we need an Offense minded coach on the bench, weather woody is there or not.

doc

May 27th, 2009
7:23 am

yeah kirk, we are on the same page sort of, it is about winning and somewhat about expectations and desire to see them at the top of the league as well. yes, i am aware chills counts on the payroll but it is not in actual revenue that someone must fork out. the only illness either of us has is called passion.

agree with your assessment though not too sure it matters about woody, more fish to fry just getting a good team together. if they falter early the call can still go out to have someone resurrect them like hubie did for the griz and none other than real coy george karl did for the nuggets. still plenty of time to give woody some more rope while i have my list ready. if he does well then move to make him an extension during the season like the tampa team did their manager but only after the season starts.

ob again yes it counts, we really dont know how significant that will be until the powers that be come up with the cap top in about 4 to 5 weeks. if the cap bothers them then we are in trouble as no team really stays below it and stays competitive is my argument. teams all have to exceed that number if they want to win. that is why tendering or not really doesnt matter in a true sense and i am not concerned about it. honestly, i dont know if the chemistry is right for him to come back even if he wants it and the team wants it. i certainly dont know what skill level he has been playing at so it is tough for me to argue one way or the other whereas last year i was a bit more um strident in my appraisal and strongly suggested he was needed and may times wished his energy was on the bench as i sat in my seat this past year.

still all in all i commend them for a very entertaining year winning more than 75% at home until the playoffs. i am not blinded by the fact there is a huge difference between us and the magic as we witnessed several times this year, nor the cavs/queenies and the c’s. that may all change quickly based on the same issues we argue the next few months as all teams have to deal with the new economy and transitional “moving parts”. as a gentle reminder regarding some of the good that bk did here as well as in memphis, jerry west looked pretty good just getting a new coach and leaving alone the players he had assumed from bk. it wasnt until he broke it up for whatever reason money, competitiveness, etc that it fell apart and they quickly lost the elite tag. again sund doesnt have a recent past history of success and was that due to ownership issues or his abilitiy?

perfect, funny stuff, again i will repeat i was born in atlanta and somehow became a hawks fan while the team was still in st louis after they last won a championship some odd 50 years ago. i wish you well as i enter my 6th decade still waiting for another championship.

MannyT

May 27th, 2009
8:57 am

niremetal,

The Hawks have Chills rights for this next season. In the summer of 2010 he is UNRESTRICTED…thus Ray’s assessment that he holds little value is true. He is the plane that takes off in mid July. If he does not opt out of his Greek contract this season, the Hawks ticket on Chills Hustle Express is worth nothing.

kirknga is correct.

…you cannot trade his rights. The best you can do to move Chills is a sign & trade ONLY IF he opts out of his Greek deal. That opt out would guarantee Chills a tender offer in the 3+ million range (before taxes) versus his Greek deal of 6+ million (after taxes)…you do the bad economy math.

…and if you are Chills, why take one year at above average (more than MLE) wages, then come back as a restricted free agent? He understands the Sund playbook on RFA.

moving on…

If Mario West spends his summer at the Ray Allen Shooting Help School , yup, RASHsi, he might catch something that will greatly extend his NBA career. Look at the impact a jump shot has on getting defensive specialists more playing time (M. Cooper, B. Bowen, S. Battier)

Pietrus is the perfect example of why a match between player skills and coaching style is critical. You think Don Nelson cared if he worked on his D enough to slow down LeBron. These days Nellie sees defense as how fast you can get the ball out of the net and get it moving the other way.

By the way, unless you are saying goodbye to Flip, I don’t think you can use the full MLE on anyone. I am not positive, but 80% sure that his raise has to come out of the MLE. The 20% uncertainty comes from his willingness to take a small raise if we have not used the bi-annual exception that would be about $2 mil.

Until July 2009, Josh is under Base Year Compensation rules. These same rules will apply to Marvin this year if he signs a contract with the Hawks even if that contract is for a sign & trade as designated by another team. Short answer, if you are over the cap that newer contract counts only 1/2 value in the NBA trade magic. So trading Josh before July is like his salary is around $5 mil, not $10 mil. End result is you get back less salary than you send. That’s usually bad news unless you are getting someone on a rookie contract.

And I’ll end this long one with a riddle or two.

Q-How do you make a king disappear?

A-Use Magic ;-)

Q-Know the way to the NBA finals?

A-I don’t, but He-do

BWAF

Veteran Fan

May 27th, 2009
9:35 am

#19, Law, and Josh for Bosh and back up point. Sign and trade Marvin for Charlie V. Sign Gortat and let Zaza and Bibby go. Find free agent point. Either resign Jones or bring Anderson from Europe Starters Bosh,Horford,Villanueva,Johnson, and Evans(or fa pg). Rotation Bosh, Horford, Gortat, Villanueva, and Jones or Anderson at 4 and 5. Villanueva,Johnson at 3. Johnson, Evans, (fa pg), possibly Murray at 1 and 2. You have balanced attack with good defenders and Bosh, Villanueva, and Gortat’s contracts should equal Bibby, Zaza, Marvin, and Josh’s. To sit tight is wrong if we are truly going for a championship! Also, Bosh trade may not take #19 which would give Hawks another chip with Childress to get a developing point. Or if Childress still wants to see the world, Toronto may be interested as he had some outstanding games against them! Josh is exciting but seems lost when the game is on the line. Bosh brings it every night and has the experience and desperately wants a championship(aka Garnett)! Would replace Bibby’s leadership!

Ken Strickland

May 27th, 2009
9:42 am

It was recently stated, in Woodson’s defense, that during the playoffs coaches always tighten their rotations. Well, we’re watching some intense semifinal action between 4 teams fighting for a chance to play fot the big prize, and almost every gm has been a thriller. And guess what, each of these 4 team participating have used a minimum of nine(9) players in their rotation.

Maybe, just maybe it’s time for those old school mentalities to wake up and pay attention to what’s really taking play in todays coaching instead of clinging to the past. The Hawks shortend their rotation, even when faced with injuries and ejections, and we got embarrassed 4 straight times.

We have a young, quick, fast, athletic club that’s being forced to play in the mud, so to speak. Suppose you have a young track star that’s flashed the ability and talent to be a world class sprinter. All he needs is proper training,development, mentoring and patience. To get the best out of him, would you ignore him, or have him practice in mud or on a slow track, or limit his time on the track or blame him for not overcoming all of these obstacles?

Let’s say that one yr he finishes consistently in the top 4. Do you credit the coach and his tactics, or do you credit the athlete for improving inspite of his obstacles. Do you realize how much better he’d be if he had the benefit of working within a system that offers him the same advantages afforded to other top sprinters, instead of spending so much energy having to overcome his obstacles. Do you realize if you removed those obstacles, he might have a better chance of finishing at the top, instead of in the top 4.

O'brien

May 27th, 2009
9:55 am

Ken Strickland, not to mention the Lakers and Nuggets. They are using a lot of bench players as well.

Another thing I like about the Magic. In all their interviews, the media wants to make a big deal about them being up 3-1 over the best team in the league (who was pre-ordained to get to the finals). But the Maigc keep saying “Our goal is to win an NBA championship, so we have not won anything yet”. I like that focus. I feel like the Hawks were happy to say “We made it to second round, so we’re happy”.

Hoops

May 27th, 2009
9:56 am

niremental,

I’ll agree with you on Toney Douglas. But here’s the thing-we only have 7 players under contract that we could use to get a better draft pick. We all know that we need a PG and a 5 man. Of those 7 players, who would we consider trading for the #2 or # 3 draft pick so we could get Rubio or Thabeet? Acie Law, R. Morris, Mo Evans, & Speedy are the only ones we would give up in a trade for a draft pick. Memphis and Oklahoma would not take either or any combination of these players for their pick. Ribio @ PG and Thabeet @ 5 are the only players @ those positions that could come in and start in this draft. I don’t think Woody would start either one of them. So if I am right, we need to draft the best player available @ # 19 and then go to work improving the team after July 1.
We need to let Bibby go and go after Devin Harris. Say he costs us 10M per. We are 18m below the cap. Now trade Josh S. and any of the above mentioned players for the best 5 man that we can get. Now we have room to resign Flip, Marvin, Zaza, and Childress.
This could be a pretty good lineup:
PG-Harris, Flip, Acie
SG-JJ, Childress
SF-Marvin, Evans
PF-Horford, Solo
C-New 5, Zaza, Morris
Give me your thoughts.

RedTailHawk

May 27th, 2009
10:35 am

I hate to be a pessimist but no matter how the Hawks work out the signings, trades, etc; they will never make it past the second round with Woodson. He simply does not know how to take advantage of the talent that he has.

I MUS.WRITE

May 27th, 2009
10:40 am

Good Blog Sekou! I would like to get Charlie V, he can really score the ball and has good size coming off the bench. He would be a good back up for the SF/PF. Also make a play for Gortat…. 7 footer with nice touch and great athleticsm (physical player). Finally at the PG spot -Jarret Jack-no need in drafting a PG that wont be allowed to play..see AC Law

Expendable/Tradeable players: Bibby,Mo Evans,AC, Thomas Gardner,Solo,

Resign Flip /ZAZA…..Chillz(5Mill per)

With those free agent pickups the line up would look like this.

PG-J.Jack/Flip
SG-JJ/Chillz
SF-Marvin/Charlie V
Pf-Smoove/CharlieV
C-Horford/Gortat/ZAZA

Toney Douglas is a late first -early second round talent, I wouldnt take him at 19#-In the second round with out hesitation…….. If all the good pg’s are gone by then- I would go for Austin Daye- 6′11 athletic and Has good range -some people compare him to a yung Dirk, the only thing that scares me is his weight………

Brandon Bass is really intriguing to me-IMO he is better right now than Horford well maybe a better scorer and post moves LOL….

Rubio’s gonna have to show me -he looked good in the olympics but he was flanked by great players, If he goes #2 he wont have that kind of help and defenses will key in on him, also this is an 82 game season not 12 summer games, I knew rose would be who he is Rubio im not sure about…….
Yall have got to chech out the Stephen a Smith interview on 790…. Brutatly honest but true

Sautee

May 27th, 2009
10:41 am

“Poop”,

about this: “I thought the no-call on Varejao at the end of the game was an excellent call… if anything the foul was on Howard for hooking Varejao’s arm.”

Najeh, I agree with you on MOST things you say. However can you REALLY tell me that if LeBron were in Howard’s place (tangled up going for a lob) that it WOULDN’T have been a foul?

doc

May 27th, 2009
10:43 am

uhh aj how about be able to play both ends of the court us what he can do besides just be ready for starters. he is a liability and a crutch for woody and the organization to not go out and get complete nba caliber basketball players. woody trusts him because he can say to him, do not do anything but defend and rebound. if you touch it get rid of it quickly. still say for all of his good he was more of a lability than solo or acie but easier to control. woody the control freak he is likes the latter.

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
10:59 am

MannyT,
Swoop in to save the day. ROFL….

If Chills can become a UFA after next season (which I believe is true but I haven’t found supporting evidence), funny how the hands of leverage turns. It has been debated that Sund overplayed his hand and if Chills walk away from the Hawks without compensation after the team extended two qualifying offers which salary cap space could have been utilize to sign other players would further underline the poorily negotiations tactics that Sund used. Good team doesn’t use the wait and see approach with players they deem valuable or has value to help the team. Sund took a gamble that Chills couldn’t find a better option and got burn for it rather he admits it or not. Chills and his agent thought outside of the box and Sund didn’t have a countermove. Now he can only hope that Chills play nice guy and forget the treatment that he received last off season to allow the Hawks to benefit from the debacle that Sund created. And you wonder why Seattle strip him of his GM position….

Hoppin' Bruh

May 27th, 2009
11:03 am

We need a point guard, but we let go of Anthony Johnson??

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
11:04 am

doc, I wasn’t speaking about Mario’s ability… just that he didn’t develop a hang-nail while waiting for his chance to play. He didn;t get an infection from the splinter’s, didn’t get carpel from twiddling his thumbs. None of that. When he was called to play, he got up and did what he could. Acie, on the other hand, tripped and fell and couldn’t get back up.

You know, the one thing I continue to find interesting is how Acie couldn’t make an impression on the assistant GM, the GM nor the Head Coach during practices. Sekou indicated in his Q & A with Hawksquawk that Sund and his assistant developed relationships with the players this year as part of the evaluation process. I’m guessing that included watching those guys in practice, listening to their interactions with the coaching staff, viewing their work habits in the practice facility, etc. Is there any chance whatsoever that after that up-close-and-personal evaluation, that Sund and his assistant could have decided “wow, that Acie is everything and a Chick Fil A combo. But we won’t mention anything to Woody about playing him more, because Woody’s coaching record suggests that he is a master of player development so let’s just sit back and wait for Woody to discover that he has Billups, Jr. on his bench wasting away”. Well, I guess that is what some are suggesting. Me, I think they looked at Acie and found they had drafted Speedy, Jr. and are ready to cut bait. But one way or another, the key point is that Acie’s evaluation was not done strictly by Woody and his coaching staff. And the same is true for SOlo, Flip, Bibby, Joe and every other player.

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
11:11 am

Melvin, my guess is that Sund think Chill is Damien Wilkins Plus. And he gave Wilkins a $3M/year salary. So going over $5M probably didn;t make sense to Sund. What I don’t think he knew, was the Chill was the glue on the team. He probably was the guy most likely to bridge the gap between the old school and the young school. I think Sund’s mistake (as you said) was in not showing enough respect for what Chill brought to the table…. for treating him like a Mo Evans/Damien Wilkins type. Like you said, it should not have ever gotten to the point where a freakin’ Euro team could have snapped him up. If nothing else, Sund should have worked an S&T. But he has a few more months to fix things (assuming that Chill opts out of his Euro contract).

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
11:22 am

Astro,

“But he has a few more months to fix things (assuming that Chill opts out of his Euro contract).”

And there lies the problem. It’s up to Chills to decide if he wants to play good guy with the Hawks after Sund gave him his (you know what) to kiss. I thought the purpose of RFA is to give the current team the advantage of signing their own players, uhhh, I guess Sund didn’t get that memo during his 30 years of service in the league….

Daniel

May 27th, 2009
11:52 am

Thanks for another great blog Sekou.
I really like the Toney Douglas idea. He is a mature player with great defensive skills. He is the kind of player that could be a solid contributor from the bench early, and not a development project, which is really nice to get at 19. However, if Lawson is available it would be hard to pass him up. I also like the Brandon Bass suggestion for his toughness in the interior. Charlie is intresting, would he be happy to be a bench rotation guy?

niremetal

May 27th, 2009
12:05 pm

MannyT,

I’m not trying to be difficult, but where are you getting that from? Seriously. I’ve seen a lot of posters say that on here and on Hawksquawk but I’ve yet to see a single reliable source that says it. Do you have one?

doc

May 27th, 2009
12:32 pm

aj on draft night i was sitting there betwen jhan and ando. they can assure you though not truly disappointed with horford more or less thinking it was a given shrugging my shoulders that i did register sheeer disappointment on the selection of acie. would have preferred crit or stuckey and will stick to my uns onthat one. it isnt about acie or mario but getting quality nba player that are available down to the 11th man with two or three in “development”. that is how i slice it. mario is not a true ba player right now and needs to be somewhere developing a shot that works in game situations. he will never get it here and would do well to leave and go somewhere to do it in action. at the same time maybe develop a handle. yes i screamed loudly with his occasional big stop but that is like yelling at the top of your lungs for a big hit by a special teams player in the nfl. get me some players. i guess that is what woody has said as well, if you cant then i am free to go and get a job elsewhere is probably what he thought to himself. heh heh

doc

May 27th, 2009
12:35 pm

melvin, ditto memo remark.

cp

May 27th, 2009
12:36 pm

I would take Jamario Moon over some of the guys we have on our bench. He would be cheap. Hell give me Moon and Bass. I have no idea what to do with the pick. I’m leaning towards Terrence Williams or Sam Young. Austin Daye is also intriguing. I just don’t think I would take a pg. If we bring Flip back he would easily get the minutes at the 1 while the rookie rides the bench.

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
1:19 pm

Melvin, I hear you. Trust me, I’m a big Childress fan and I think Sund played himself. I think that Sund will get a bail out, because Chill has to be thinking about that recent riot in Greece and not wanting to be a UFA the same year as LeBron, Wade, Amare, Bosh and others. While we can’t technically trade Chill prior to the draft, maybe we can arrange for the Suns to draft someone for us at #14 and then work a S & T on 7/1 that brings us that pick along with maybe Matt Barnes for Chill.

doc, no arguments here about Mario. Cute story, cameo appearances only, thank you. I applauded the Acie selection. And felt vindicated after his debut against Dallas in his rookie season. I still think that he can have a very good NBA career but clearly, it won’t be with the Hawks. I wonder if the Kings would give us their second 1st round pick (around #24) for him?

Big Ray

May 27th, 2009
1:20 pm

KIRK and DOC,

Very good and refreshing remarks from you both.

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
1:22 pm

cp, I think if Sund picks a PG at #19, he becomes the apprentice to Bibby for the next year or two. And if that indeed happens, then that tells you what Sund thinks of Acie.

MannyT

May 27th, 2009
1:41 pm

niremetal…good point.

I’ll go hunting through the electronic stacks later this week…maybe he won’t be unrestricted. If he had never played in the league after being drafted, the Hawks would hold his rights, a la David Andersen. Because he has played, that rule is not necessarily the one to apply.

If you want to do the digging, the key is in any changes to the wording of rookie contract first round pick restricted free agency based on rules prior to the 2007 draft. (Note how AC & Al have team options after 3 years instead of 4 like Marvin & the Joshes.) It’s the prior part that makes the research messy.

I’ll temporarily back off of UNRESTRICTED until I get my reference.

BWAF

Big Ray

May 27th, 2009
1:55 pm

Astro Joe,

I’d just as soon ship the guy and leave the speculation alone. Nothing against him, as I’ve been in his corner, but better to cut the tie while other teams are interested.

Doc,

While I’d agree that there is probably more upside in both Stuckey and Crittenton, we’re still talking about fit. Crittenton couldn’t get any real burn with the Lakers or Grizzlies, and finally showed something with the despondent Wizards. How would things have gone for him here, vs how they went for Law? Sure, there is an argument both ways for that situation, but I think you know exactly how that would have gone, considering that we worked both guys out at the same time, if you remember.

Stuckey has hardly gotten Detroit fans to forget Billups, or any other lead guard in Detroit. He wasn’t enough to re-direct the distraction that was Iverson. Again, a good pick if playing under the current regime? Still, talent vs talent, you win the argument hands down…

Ken Strickland,

I agree on many fronts. As always, the situation with Woody and his bench is a “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” type of discussion. Did the bench get underutilized by a coach who is laboring under the awful working conditions of job insecurity, or is it that the bench players are largely no good? Are they no good because they are cheap, talent-bereft roster filler, or because Woody has chosen not to make the effort to forge them into useable pieces of a fairly deep rotation.

Here again, we cannot ignore fit. If a guy doesn’t fit, it’s hard for him to succeed, unless he is a clear and obvious talent. But if his talent is that obvious, then we assume he would be playing, yes? Perhaps, and perhaps not. You have only to look at Golden State and Don Nelson for proof that a player can be reasonably talented, and still not get much in the way of playing time….simply because he does not fit, or perhaps more specifically because the coach feels that he does not fit whatever system he employs, or does what the coach wants him to do.

While I have been critical of Woody, in believing that you work with what you have, I cannot ignore the fact that someone like Randolph Morris is anything but a free agent steal. And while Gardner seems to be a fairly talented shooter, and Hunter seems to have good fundmentals, can we say with certainty that they fit/fill the roles/needs we, Woody, Sund, and everyone else says we need filled?

Chicken and the egg.

Only, in our case (and because I’m an unrelenting smartass when I choose to be), I have to add the presence of a barnyard pervert to this equation. You can assign whomever you please to that role. I have MY ideas, of course… ;)

Big Ray

May 27th, 2009
2:08 pm

“cp, I think if Sund picks a PG at #19, he becomes the apprentice to Bibby for the next year or two. And if that indeed happens, then that tells you what Sund thinks of Acie.”

Yep, agree with that. But then, what begs the question is how to proceed with Bibby and Flip. May not be a good idea to move him Acie too quickly (unless trading for another pg), since he’s the only pg currently under contract.

Then again, I watched Larry Brown insist that MJ and the front office draft DJ Augustin. The result was improved (though not necessarily by leaps and bounds) in Felton’s play. Felton claims he wants to stay in Charlotte. We’ll see how that unfolds. Brown may not have changed his mind…

terrell barron

May 27th, 2009
2:17 pm

Looking at Sunds last 3 1st rdrs, BK looks like a freakin Genius. Are you kidding me? Sene, Petro ,etc.. WOW! He’ll probably end up taking Mullens, who’ll end up being the white version of Randolph Morris. At least playing for Woody, he will.

terrell barron

May 27th, 2009
2:19 pm

Big Ray, but Felton was moved to the 2. Wasn’t he?

I MUS.WRITE

May 27th, 2009
2:21 pm

Cp-I would be happy as hell with Bass and Moon -They are two underrated players IMO….Astro thats a good idea -I dont know if SAC would bite on that,but AC for the 24 pick sounds like a winner….. I mean you cant get any worse the guy doesnt play and is always hurt so…

Jack-Moon -Bass -Gortat would be a nice off season but I would be happy with 3 of the 4

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
2:32 pm

Astro,

I would preferred the Kings next year 1st rounder for Acie. The 24th pick is too low for an exchange of a former lottery selection and Sactown will probably be a lottery team again next season so that will provide us a chance at the John Wall sweepstakes…

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
2:36 pm

Ray, let’s hope that Sund has a few contingency names lined-up if Bibby/Flip don’t work out. Or, like you said, maybe #19 inspires #11 to compete.

Manny & nire, I just sent an email to the ShamSports crew about the Childress contract debate. They have a tremendous understanding of NBA contracts. (Let’s hope that Sund also has a tremendous knowledge of NBA contracts).

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
2:49 pm

I understand that GMs prefer their chosen players over guys they may have inherited. But is there any chance that if Trey Lewis was looking like the second-coming of Haynesworth repeatedly during practices, that TD wouldn’t suggest to Smith that he may want to find a way to get him on the field during the game? Is there any reason to believe that Sund wouldn’t do the same?

We can question quite a bit about Woody and his coaching skills but can anyone truly question his passion and commitment to winning? While others employ 4 men in the relay race, Woody may only choose 2. But did he choose two because he was indifferent about winning or because he thought those two gave him the best chance to finish first?

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
2:54 pm

Melvin, no team is trading Acie for a pick that would result in a top 5 selection. It would most certainly be protected… probably top 15 protected. Only Isiah Thomas would do something that stupid (and unfortunately, he is gone).

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
3:04 pm

Astro,

It was wishful thinking…

Sekou Smith

May 27th, 2009
3:19 pm

Charlie V. and Sessions could be on the open market this summer if the Bucks are serious about the financial discipline my man Tom Enlund wrote about http://www.jsonline.com/sports/bucks/46136062.html

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
3:39 pm

Sekou,

I can see a teams like Memphis or Detroit (under cap) offering a MLE or better contract to Charlie V. They will simply outbid teams that’s over the cap (like the Hawks). As for Sessions, I think the Bucks will have a good chance to retain him as he may be the cheaper of the two to resign…

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
4:05 pm

Melvin, Dumars needs to swing for the fences. Charlie V. is more like a single… he needs a home run (like Boozer or Artest or Hedo if he opts out).

Heard back from Sham Psorts, they are not aware of anything in the CBA that suggests that Childress’ RFA status “expires” after 2 years.

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
4:35 pm

Chad Ford’s latest mock draft shows us drafting Ty Lawson. But it also suggests that Teague will be drafted ahead of Lawson (which sounds strange to me).

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
4:48 pm

Astro,

Artest already said that he will be a Rocket next season. Boozer may choose not to opt out his current deal when he can test the FA waters of 2010, when there will be more shark in the waters. As for Hedo, at worst the Magic will pay the luxury tax to keep him or see the Boozer explanation.

STRETCH

May 27th, 2009
4:54 pm

Astro Joe…they are projected to draft Ty Lawson? Hmmm…that would be Tyronne Lue + Acie Law = Ty Lawson right? LOL!

niremetal

May 27th, 2009
5:18 pm

I just got an email from Larry Coon, finally. He says:

They can keep making q-offers, and he will remain restricted as long as they do.

The idea is that you can’t skip the league for a while to avoid being an RFA.

Until I hear otherwise from a “higher authority,” I’ll take Coon’s word on it.

Tyger

May 27th, 2009
5:40 pm

There’s a Quitter Among Us???

The first thing I want to know is who quit? After witnessing Orlando dismantle the Lebrons, I find it hard to believe that the Hawks couldn’t/wouldn’t win one game at home.

The Hawks held their own vs the Magic, but cant win one game vs the Lebrons? Yet, the Lebrons are one miracle away from being swept? Nah!!! There’s a quitter or two in our midst; and before anything else is done, they have to be identified.

The Magic may be a better overall organization, from the Ownership to Otis Smith to Van Gundy to Martin Gortat, they compliment each other. But this is beyond luck, beyond Dwight Howard – they have the heart of champions. They don’t quit, they don’t back down, they fight to the end, they are focused on winning. All the while, missing their lil’ field general, Jameer Nelson.

But time after time, their money players step up to the challenge: D.Howard, R.Lewis, H.Turkoglu, R.Alston, M. Pietrus.

And ours shy away; that’s the bottom line. Injuries complicate matters somewhat, but there is a pattern, a constant, which is poor playoff performance. And that is a major factor going forward but the euphoria of being a decent team again won’t linger longer. The Hawks have a current playoff record of 7-11, 64%, not good.

Otherwise, under this regime, we cant expect better, unless everyone is 100% healthy.

How do you commit major cap space to a guy(s) that don’t show up in the playoffs?

I say renounce them all. Have your key UFA/RFA bring back their best offers and resign them in August. Flip, Marvin, ZaZa are as good or better than anything else out there, it just depends on their price and the market.

But renouncing allows us to get under the cap and slightly upgrade the roster in the process.

Jamaal Crawford, 6-5, G, 20 ppg. – not afraid to take big shot, uptempo baller, better than Bibby and Flip combined.

Drew Gooden, 6-10, 250, PF/C – 12ppg./ 8reb./ 2009 salary $1.5M – big banger who wont shy away from role of enforcer; yet very skilled in the block – offensively and defensively; former NCAA POY would drastically upgrades front line.

Morris Almond, 6′6, G/F – good young shooter with complete skill set; AAU teammate of Smoove, RandMo, D.Howard. Upgrades AC Law/Mario West/T. Gardner.

These additions, plus drafting either BJ Mullens or Terrence Williams, in the 1st. Taking a flyer on Garrett Siles, 6′11, 305, C, Augusta State in the second.

Wish list:

Jamaal Crawford, 6-5, G – 20ppg combo guard that doesnt shy away from big shots – $5M
Drew Gooden, 6-10, C-F – 13ppg/8reb; big banger w/ low post skills; 2008 salary – $1.4M
Morris Almond, 6-6, G-F – good young local shooter with high hoops I.Q – $2M
Marvin Williams, 6-9, F – too early to give up on #2 pick – $7M
ZaZa Pachulia, 6-11, C-F – best backup C in the NBA – $5M
Flip Murray, 6-2, G – 12ppg/ 2 assists – outplayed Bibby for right to return – $3M

Bibby, Solo, Mario, Gardner, Speedy, Chills, AC Law – are history.

Najeh Davenpoop

May 27th, 2009
5:41 pm

“However can you REALLY tell me that if LeBron were in Howard’s place (tangled up going for a lob) that it WOULDN’T have been a foul?”

Maybe, but my statement was that the call made was a good call. If LeBron had been in the same situation and the foul had been called, it would have been a bad call. I don’t think Howard should have got the call just because James possibly would have.

Big Ray

May 27th, 2009
5:52 pm

Astro Joe,

I have to laugh at your comparison of Sund/Woody to Dimitroff/Smith. Not to make fun of you at all, just to say that Dimitroff/Smith are so obviously on the same page at all times. So much so, that it has shown up in print more than once. Were Billy/Woody? How about Sund/Woody? Um, NO. With THESE guys the phrases “tried to fire more than once” and “did not even bring up the topic of an extension” are what make it to print.

RealSquawk

May 27th, 2009
5:56 pm

Tyger, I have to ditto your sentiment about quitting.

Blast

May 27th, 2009
6:14 pm

Love the call for Childress, but somehow I don’t see him coming back to the Hawks. I would be really suprised if Sund can pull that off.

The Conference Finals shows what a ballclub needs to be truly elite. A deep team that can go 9-10 without a drop in scoring. It also shows that teams can win without a Kobe/Wade or LeBron like superstar. the Pistons showed it when they had Chauncey. Hawks don’t have that superstar, but they can pattern themselves after Orlando and Denver to have a winning formula.

Have always rooted for the underdogs, and hated the league and cheating refs but love the game. So it’s thrilling to see Orlando give The King and his merry men a can of whoop ass. LeBron is earning his paycheck, but his teammates must step up their play for them to have a chance.

I so pray Orlando wins the series though, which they should have swept 4-0. How devastating will that be for Stern, ESPN and TNT and all LeBron sponsors? AND should Denver win the West also, prepare for worldwide panic in the basketball kingdom.

MannyT

May 27th, 2009
6:37 pm

I’m one of the last folks to go against Larry Coon. Until there is evidence otherwise, I’ll go with Childress and Sund are locked at the RFA hip until further notice…no matter how much they might not like it.

MEA CULPA.

Chills has to go through Sund to get back in the NBA at some point (assuming Sund stays in Atlanta). Sund has to keep tendering Chills and living with that oversized cap hold charge during free agency until Chills returns.

Unless there is a loophole, they both get bent over the fiscal barrel by the basic rules…and so do we. ouch.

BWAF

niremetal

May 27th, 2009
6:39 pm

Yeah, I doubt Childress is coming back here too. I bet that this is the last season that the Hawks choose to make a tender offer, ESPECIALLY if they don’t extend JJ (in which case, they’ll need the $5.5M in extra cap room next summer to sign a free agent). In that sense, he’s a “lost asset,” although I still fail to see any other feasible way the Hawks could have handled the Childress situation that would have improved the team.

girly boy (post-op)

May 27th, 2009
6:52 pm

All this trade talk gives me the giggles! Just trade Joe Johnson, hire Avery Johnson, and make a deal with Beelzebub to bring Bosh to Atlanta.

freshd

May 27th, 2009
7:02 pm

If MEMPHIS drafts THABEET, I say trade AC LAW and a future pick to get MARC GASOL to help bang on the inside.

Blair Rausmussen

May 27th, 2009
7:14 pm

How About Kyle Lorver as a RFA? Help spread the floor and we desperatley need a shooter!!

Blair Rausmussen

May 27th, 2009
7:15 pm

Missed the K!

BrittishAnger

May 27th, 2009
7:32 pm

My answer for what our off-season needs to be like would be very manageable if we could just drop the albatross’ from around our neck and look at what we have rather than what we hold rights to. Our rights to David Andersen and Josh Childress are worthless to us and are effectively blocks towards making effective use of the salary cap space we have (neither of them is coming back any time soon…just give it up already and bury the hatchet where it lies). Speedy Claxton is the only other immediate player whose contract needs nullifying: buy him out and let him find a nice NBADL team to run with until he retires into obscurity for good. I think our core can be kept, even if they’re all one year deals with team options behind them, but even then our core is only 8 deep, nine maybe counting Acie Law if you aren’t me and like Flip backing Bibby far better than Acie as the backup, so we do need to strengthen our core. If Sund believes, truly believes, we are a 50-50 Fast-break/Half-court team, then we need two squads to ensure that, one like our starting five is now (fast break with some half court skills), and something like Beaubois (French PG who Bibby could train up easier than Acie)/Flip/Mo/Zaza/Mullens which would become the half-court slowdown set with some transition/fast break skills. Bibby won’t take a serious decline in pay, but getting rid of those worthless contracts gives us some room to resign him while taking the age into , and nobody else on the squad should really be looking for a serious increase in pay, keeping our team pretty much the way it was. I do wish we could get some better Euro Prospects to fill out our team, even some South American options on the floor (we are in Atlanta, and last I checked our unofficial second language is Spanish), but short of bringing Wilcox over or finding some unchecked center who can fill that role, ignore the PG problem for one more year by bringing Bibby back, open up some options, and make a better B-Team to keep the rotations fresh (We need to limit Joe Johnson’s minutes next year anyways or risk blowing him out before he’s really at his peak).

BrittishAnger

May 27th, 2009
7:34 pm

Correction/Edit

****Bibby won’t take a serious decline in pay, but getting rid of those worthless contracts gives us some room to resign him while taking his age into account, and nobody…***

Astro Joe

May 27th, 2009
7:45 pm

Ray, I’m not sure why a boss and employee need to be on the same page for the boss to tell the employee to play a talented player. My point had nothing to do with rather or not their families get together for Sunday dinner, just that the head coach likely can’t hide a potential contributor in the dungeon of the arena/stadium. And the notion that Woody potentially is NOT on the same page as his bosses (past and present) reinforces my assumption that he must be making the right call on Acie.

Tyger, you may have missed the fact that the Magic have won something like 9 of the last 12 games against the Cavs going back a few years.

LouHudaon

May 27th, 2009
7:48 pm

First of all, the Chris Bosh love afare has to stop. He’s a nice player, but his teams have never made it past the first round. He’s a great regular season guy, but he’s too soft to be a different maker in the playoff. Next, JSmoove and/or Horford will not be traded, period. A S & T involving Marvin with a bench player is the only option to receive a big man worth getting. Kaman or Pryszilla are the likely options. Their teams already have a big man and they want to reduce their payrolls. The Hawks must without question get a defensive persence in the lane. ZaZa is a good offense center who can rebound on the offensive end. However, it is unlikely he can be resigned if one of the afore mentioned players comes to the Atlanta. Solo will be resigned as the backup center(cheap). This opens the door for Chills possible return. The big men and forwards rotation will make for an extremely good defensive group.
Next resign Flip (3yr/9-12mil), Joe and Flip are your scoring options with some outside shooting from Evans. Offer Bibby 3yr/15-18mil if he refuses let him go sign Jarrett Jack. Make a decision about Law’s future. This will determine your selection(19th pick) for a Big, scorer, or point guard. These moves keep the Hawks way under the cap and prepared them for next off season signings. The rest of the roster are all developmental players(cheap)anyway.
Finally, GM Sund and Coach Woody futures will be determined based on Sund off season moves and Woody’s choice to coach for a championship or a job.
Go Hawks!

Tyger

May 27th, 2009
8:02 pm

Ramon Sessions is a 17% 3pt shooter. And Charlie V doesn’t have any eyebrows. I’m not sure they can help us.

O'brien

May 27th, 2009
8:04 pm

For the record, Sund has been on record twice saying that he liked Acie. He said that last year when he came here, and he said that to Mark Bradley a couple weeks ago. He agreed that he inherited Acie (did not pick him), but he also said he liked how Acie was playing before the injury.

Tyger, I agree with some of your comments. One correction though. The Hawks playoff record is 7 wins, 11 losses, which is actually 39% (not 64%).

glw

May 27th, 2009
8:06 pm

BrittishAnger,

I agree with much of what you have to say, especially about the halfcourt/fastbreak mix. What hurt us most in our series against the Cavs is we didnt get out and run enough. I know the old saying, is defense wins championships, but its strange how it seems 3 of the 4 teams still playing are known more for their offense. I think maybe teams have realized that because defense wins championships, improved offensive execution, getting out running on fast breaks creating easy scoring oppourtunities gives you a chance to counter the strong defensive teams. The Hawks did it last year against Boston and came close. I like having Bibby back next year, but I’d love to see a younger pg (Law, Sessions, Jack, 1st rounder), running with JSmoove, Marvin, and Horford. Then when we need that half court game we still have the Bibby/Johnson pick and roll option.

Also, I love Childress and was worried after he went to Greece, but I feel Flip/Mo did an excellent job of replacing him. So if he wants to stay in Greece or whatever, so be it. I dont care if we lose rights or not if their is someone else that would make the team better. And wing players come a dime a dozen in this league.

I have heard a lot of people say sign and trade Marvin, but is such a deal like that possible? sign and trade can only work with a team that has cap space to sign him, and that is only a couple of teams. So, I would think that scenario is unlikely.

ILL-logical

May 27th, 2009
8:13 pm

Role players? The current Hawks team can’t establish their own roles other than rebound ,set picks and pass the ball to Joe. We are getting a little ahead of ourselves with any discussions of trades or FA ’s until it is clearly established what type of team the Hawks are and in that context what is everyone’s role.

Case in point: Martine Borat has impressed me with his play in the Cavaliers series.He will be a free agent July 1 and presently makes about $700 K. Would his skill set improve the Hawks; would his knowaledge of Dwight Howard be helpful and would his cost be prohibitve? Yes,yes and no. but if he signed here would he start? Why would he want to sit on the bench here when he could be a bench player for the World champs?
And if he does start, who sits and what type of offensive and defensive schemes are employed? Will Woodson change his approach with a talented big on the roster who can run the floor and defend the post?

And there is that chemistry thing. Will his talent mesh with the team’s? My point is that there are a number of variables involved in putting all the pieces in place but the priorities and the key players to meet them have to come first, then we can talk about role players.

Labraun's Pixie Dust

May 27th, 2009
8:18 pm

Borat? Do you mean Gortat? I love for Sund to bring him to Atlanta!

In other news, the league did the right thing and rescinded that technical on Dwight Howard. One of many bad calls last night.

Blast

May 27th, 2009
8:20 pm

Y’all remember Jon Barry saying back then that Orlando will only win one game against Cleveland in the West finals? Ha, ha, ha, ha! Smart insight, Mr. analyst know nothing Jon Barry! How do you feel now?

Blast

May 27th, 2009
8:25 pm

How many techs has the league rescinded so far in the playoffs? Goes to show how woefull the officating has been, and the league office knows it. By rescinding those techs, you’re basically saying your refs made a terrible call….Again.

Labraun's Pixie Dust

May 27th, 2009
8:33 pm

Blast: Co-sign.

RealSquawk

May 27th, 2009
8:34 pm

If going off the measurements I used to decide whether or not Flip would be a good signing Charlie V would be great.
Basically what I did was think about how Flip played against the Hawks. He torched us every time he was unstoppable and unfriendly to the point where he caused us to loose games.

Charlie V didn’t cause us to loose games, but he sure does go off when he plays us.

Charlie V would be great and he would more replace the void of soon to be traded Josh Smith.
(maybe not)

DJ

May 27th, 2009
8:34 pm

I’ve always liked Charlie V. He is a good player. Every part of his game is ok or good. His defense is OK. Offense is good, he can back you down in the lane or he can shoot a three right over your head. He would e an awesome back-up to Josh Smith or maybe even try starting him at the Small-Forward position. THE HAWKS NEED HIM.

The free agents we need to re-sign are obvious. Flip and ZaZa. If we get Charlie V. than there is no need to get another scorer. ZaZa is NEEDED, whenever ZaZa came in the crowd was into it and he was a good player. He is one of the best offensive rebounders in the league.

I think we should do a sign and trade with marvin william and Acie law. for a good center or a point guard. Maybe a Marc Gasol or a Raymond Felton.

Blast

May 27th, 2009
9:45 pm

I can’t believe how much the refs are trying to help LA win tonite in game 5. It’s just incredible. Lakers playing well, Denver playing decent, but Denver should be able to pull off the win despite the refs.

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
10:30 pm

Good thing the Magic didn’t lose by 1 pt last night. Especially since Stern and his boys rescinded the techical foul call. In order words, the Cavs should have never been allow the opportunity to score that 1 pt from the free throwline. Now that I think deeper about the situation, maybe the Magic would have won the game during regulation instead of Lebron shooting two free throws to send the game into overtime….hmmmm

darrell starks

May 27th, 2009
10:49 pm

Lou hudson are you kidding me about bosh if you bring bosh to the hawks he will be your best player on the team if you think that BIBBY, JOE, MARVIN, JOSH, HORFORD can get the job done then we are in for a long season specially with the WIZARDS, BUCKS, SIXERS, PACERS, NETS, BULLS,AND BOBCATS where injured most of the year in a water down eastern conf.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sekou Smith

May 27th, 2009
10:54 pm

Charlie V has a medical condition Tyger, so there’s a reason for his eyebrow-free look. Take it easy on him man. And we’re probably jumping the gun on a ton of stuff around here (but hey, that’s what we do). I think a lot can change in the free agent game this summer depending on who opts out, who decides to agree to an extension this summer rather than playing the waiting game for the summer of 2010 and who gambles and loses in free agency and then has to scramble to make things right late in the summer. And that’s not counting what goes on before, during and around the draft. So much can change between now and July 15.

niremetal

May 27th, 2009
11:36 pm

Not-so-subtle spike in number of fouls called against the Nuggets in the past 5 minutes. Hmph.

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
11:42 pm

Kmart looks like it was closed for business tonight…

Big Ray

May 27th, 2009
11:43 pm

Astro Joe,

“Ray, I’m not sure why a boss and employee need to be on the same page for the boss to tell the employee to play a talented player.”

I’m not sure either. WTF are you talking about?

WTF? Why do you always take things to the exaggerated extreme? Who said anything about ANYBODY getting together for Sunday dinner? MY point was that Dimitroff and Smith have a relationship that is nothing like what we SEEM to see with Woody and his boss, both past and present.

Dimitroff and Smith say the same things, not opposite ones. They both agree on how to build a team and what not. Yes, one is the boss of the other. Yes, they have different jobs. But the fact that they share the same philosophies so closely simply helps them to do their jobs. The GM can’t coach, and the coach is no GM. But they both believe in the same idea. They both want players who play fast, violent, and with a sense of urgency. So does Dimitroff go out and get guys who are slow-footed, take plays off regularly, and aren’t hard-nosed? NO!

Conversely, look at the team Billy Knight was putting together, and tell me how well that meshes with Woody’s style? Billy Knight once said that you don’t need a pg to be a successful team. Yet Woody can’t seem to function AT ALL without not only a pg, but a veteran pg. Sund said he likes Acie, and his potential. Of course, he could be a flat out liar (I’ll let you accuse him of that, or come up with some other explanation as to what he REALLY meant by that). Woody said prior to the season, he just wanted Acie to be himself, go out there, and lead the team. Gee, I guess he wasn’t “being himself”, and he damn sure didn’t lead the team. Healthy or not. I don’t really care about that at this point. I’m of the opinion that we either play him real minutes, or trade him away, period.

But with Woody and his boss, you tend to hear different things. Sund talks about the importance of player development. Woody doesn’t. Instead, he says he wants to play a 9 or 10 man rotation early in the season. Later, he talks about how all they need to do is go out and get a better bench. Never on the same page, and it doesn’t have $hit to do with a GM telling his coach to play a talented player.

My point is, a coach and a GM NEED to be on the same page on at least some things. Otherwise, you have a roster of players that don’t fit the philosophy, approach, or skill set of the coach. Or vice versa, if you choose to view it that way.

“And the notion that Woody potentially is NOT on the same page as his bosses (past and present) reinforces my assumption that he must be making the right call on Acie.”

Ah. See, this is what it all really came down to. While I suggested that the relationship between the Falcons coach and GM was nothing like the relationship between Woody and Knight/Sund, somehow I managed to trigger your “DEFEND WOODY AT ALL COSTS” button. Lord only knows how far THIS one will go…

Dude, don’t know how many times, or how many ways I can say that I’m over the whole Acie Law thing. I want to see him traded away or become a serious part of the rotation. What I want is good asset use/management. That’s all. If we aren’t going to use the guy, or think he can’t become anything for us, then get rid of him! Ain’t gonna hurt my feelings one bit. And I do recall saying I had no solid answer for his injuries and apparent unwillingness to play hurt. If the dude ain’t working out, cut him loose! I think some of the situation falls on Acie, and some of it falls on Woody. I won’t change my stance on it, but I’m not focused on it, either.

But I have to laugh at that. So the fact that Woody isn’t on the same page as either Knight or Sund actually confirms the idea that you think Woody is right about Acie? No, it simply confirms that you tend to think Woody is right, period. The fact that he tends not to be on the same page as his boss tells me something altogether different. But we won’t get into that. Might push your button…

But hey, if we go with that kind of logic, then anybody could pipe up and say that Woody’s lack of an extension, after the best season he’s ever had as a head coach, only reinforces the assumption that he needs to be let go. Dammit. I think I hit that button yet again…that wasn’t fair, was it? Same idea, just applied to a different target….

Big Ray

May 27th, 2009
11:51 pm

Sekou,

“and who gambles and loses in free agency and then has to scramble to make things right late in the summer.”

This is what I do NOT want to see us doing AGAIN. I know that sometimes this is part of the game, but I still don’t like it. Oh well…

But hey. Everything will be fine. After all, we’ve got Woody around still, and nobody knows talent like he does. He’s smarter than two GMs put together. In fact, that’s why he didn’t get an extension. It’s because Gearon is going to promote him to GM, or President of Basketball Operations (a position above Sund).

I think I read that somewhere. A place called AJSPORTS.NET.

Don’t look it up. Trust me.

Melvin

May 27th, 2009
11:53 pm

A total meltdown by the Nuggets in the 4th…

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
12:39 am

Gee Ray, tell us what you REALLY think ;-)

Ca$h

May 28th, 2009
12:55 am

Joe the Joke!! Unforced turnover committing, baby-bottom soft paint attempt shooting, 1 foot jumping, injury complex from Phoenix having, contact shying, overpaid, non-shot contesting, traveling, no-show in the playoffs performing, contested shot settling, shot-clock wasting, weak dribbling, often stripped and blocked handling, 2 free-throws the whole game shooting, zipped-lipped, emotionless, last man back in transition running, non fast break finishing, once every two months dunking, defeatist attitude having, excuse making, useless baseline game having, waste of a 6′7 240 lb frame. Offense or no offense, these are shortcomings that I can’t bear to watch from a supposed “number 1″ option any more. He barley puts up 20.0ppg in season and in the playoff thanks to Josh we beat Mami Heat… he over paid for his talent and age he not going to get much better due to his age. O yea again he over paid… TRADE

kirkinga

May 28th, 2009
1:57 am

But hey. Everything will be fine. After all, we’ve got Woody around still, and nobody knows talent like he does. He’s smarter than two GMs put together. In fact, that’s why he didn’t get an extension. It’s because Gearon is going to promote him to GM, or President of Basketball Operations (a position above Sund).

LOL! Oh my..that was good. I needed that laugh thanks Ray .

Um, but as long time Atlanta sports fan, I know better than to dismiss the idea out of hand.

kirkinga

May 28th, 2009
2:39 am

doc, I’m going to have to agree with you again…lol!

Yes there are bigger fish to fry with the construction of the the team tantamount to the coach..or seemingly so.

It get’s back to the vision thing and Sund’s, and as you pointed out ASG’s lack thereof.I think part of Ray’s and Astro Joe’s dialoge about the GM-Coach synchronization is instructive in this regard. Dimitroff and Coach Smith both agree on what a winning football team needs to look like and appear to be on the same page. There doesn’t appear to be serious disagreement about what the areas of weakness are and what type of player is needed to address those weaknesses.

We saw also with great success with John Schuerholz and Bobby Cox. Overwhelming pitching, solid defense and timely hitting was their vision and they worked that vision pretty well.

Does Wadell have a vision for the Thrashers? If he does it sure is immediately apparent to even a casual hockey fan.

Fratello and Kasten started out with the same vision I think, but diverged at some point which hasten the departure of Fratello and the grounding of the Atlanta Air Force.

With this indecision over Coach Woodson, he will be building a team with the GM and Head Coach apparently at some odds as to where each sees this team. So what Sund constructs during the offseason, is it for Woodson, or the next guy? If it’s the next guy then this offseason affords the team a much better environment to make major changes and synchronize visions than firing Woodson at some point in the season.

So yes picking the fish is most important because the more talent, the better the chance to win. But if you’re not sure whether you’re going to fry, bake, or grill, then you’re really wasting time aren’t you?

I promise to keep an open mind though. But until I see what Sund picks up in the market, I can’t realistically set any expectations for next season and that’s part of the frustration too.

cp

May 28th, 2009
3:44 am

ray you’re on fire I see lol

dap01

May 28th, 2009
7:49 am

The Hawks organization is so disfunctional.

doc

May 28th, 2009
7:55 am

well pick me up off the floor.

kirk, now i am going to borrow from you, all is well. heh heh

i will not have any expectation nor frustration over this off season because there is so much work to be done and i have no clear cut answer as what to be done nor what will be done to even begin to have some emotional attachment to it. so right now i’ll just sit back knowing i have said my load last year and if heard there would have been less turmoil this year. i will watch and see if the basg has really grown as an organization then set my expectation for the upcoming season much later. for me it will be a pretty relaxed summer because i have set my expectations very low based on what has gone before. just having a team and a seat to watch them will be a luxury. if i end up going more to see the other team then i will assure you one of the luxuries will be gone this time next year. pragmatic, eh?

btw, ditto on your thoughts regarding the history of sports in this town. lived it a long time and no misrepresentation there.

RealSquawk

May 28th, 2009
9:19 am

Completely off topic is there any player five years in the league that has made major improvement or changed his personality and style?

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
9:24 am

The Dream matchup of Kobe and Lebron in the Finals is looking more like the nightmare of Dan and Dave 1992 Olympics showdown where only 1 made it to the big show. Take that David Stern….. Lets Go Magic…

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
9:26 am

Still not sure what you’re talking about Ray, no mattter how bold, indented or italicized. I discussed the role of the GM as another set of eyes to evaluate players and you started discussing GM and coach being on the same page. Huh?

It’s not about defending Woody as much as it is about discussing the premise that any coach could single handedly hold back a team/player without anyone having the power (short of terminating him) to do something about it. My point is and was that a GM (or his assistant) also have a view into what players are doing. And that’s the way it should be. The more eyes the better.

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
9:33 am

RealSquawk, when did Billups go from draft bust to clutch leader? I’m not sure if it was prior to his 5th year or after, but he was the first guy who came to mind regarding your question. Hard to say if he was a late bloomer or just someone who was in the wrong system(s) but we know that he bounced around a lot before he emerged into the player that won the crown with Detroit.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
9:39 am

RealSquawk,

Chauncey Billups, Devon Harris, Jermaine O’Neal are some that off the top of my head, didn’t become truly solid players until their 5th year.

Is this because you doubt Josh’s ability to improve enough?

Veteran Fan

May 28th, 2009
9:49 am

Josh for Bosh and assorted pieces! Sign Gortat! Resign Flip! Resign Jones. Do not resign Bibby and Zaza too expensive! Sign and trade Marvin for developing pg! Use #19 for trade or pg or shooting guard. Rotation Bosh, Horford, Johnson, Murray and new pg. Gortat and Jones give length and defensive presence and Bosh can play 3 when Joe needs a rest. Sign Childress for defensive presence or sign and trade him for Charlie V. Good defense but more consistent offense every night with points coming from every spot!

Hoops

May 28th, 2009
9:49 am

Tyger,

Preach it brother, preach it! Amen, Amen, Amen!

If I am reading you right, is this your lineup?
PG-Flip
SG-Jamaal Crawford, Evans
SF-JJ, Marvin, Morris Almond
PF-Horford, J. Smith
C-Drew Gooden, Zaza, Morris

I don’t know how you are swinging the money, but I like this team if we can add Sessions or Devin Harris @ PG. We can win the NBA Championship with this team!

Veteran Fan

May 28th, 2009
10:15 am

Prediction is Hawks sit pat and resign Bibby and Marvin and possibly not make playoffs next season. Joe traded to a contender for playoff run and eventually reunited with Dantoni in NY with the Knicks along with Bosh. Lebron switches to New Jersey with young front line and another guard and NJ and NY become the toast of the league for five years of fast paced showtime basketball! Howard moves to NJ or NY or Boston and D.Wade and Chris Paul join one of those franchises for star power! This is our year folks and then David Stern will look the other way while these three franchises throw money at stars. East will be four team media circus with Knicks, Nets, Bulls, and possibly Boston and everyone else scrambling for crumbs! Our franchise will probably move to Tampa or back to St. Louis as fewer people come out to watch Josh Smith miss threes and play indifferent defense and Woodson claim he cannot fix the offense! Management needs to have the guts to ignore the media and go for the ring! Cavaliers are a good team with a very good player but we were exposed in the Miami series and we need another consistent shooter and scorer(Bosh) which we can afford! We need a big man who can score Gortat and we can afford! We need a point that can shoot but dishes first(not Bibby) and play some defense! Need a defensive stopper at 2 or 3(Marvin or Childress). Lets see if there is a vision in Atlanta or are they just filling seats and know the league will not allow them to make run!

Ariose

May 28th, 2009
10:35 am

After wathich Rafer and Mo go to work last night. It’s obvious thant we need a guard that is big physically and can handle the ball like Acie can. Acie being able to put all of his gifts togeter at once is the hard part though.

Mo Williams went hard last night in the first half. If Bibby was guarding him it would’ve been goodnight Hawks. I WANT acie to succeed. He is the type of guard that’s all the rage now: Big, Fast, and very hard to keep out of the paint.

I mean If they are going to evaluate him then let him run the damn show for AT LEAST the first 5min of every game. (Like what mike did with Royal Ivey or Denver does with Dhantay Jones). If not, There are some VERY, VERY, GOOD PG’s in this upcoming draft, that we should aquire.

But I will not accept another season of treading water as far as our PG situation is concerned. Not having a Legit guard who contributes on a regular baisis and will be a stple for this francise for years to come, while renting out the services of an aging/slowing Mike Bibby is NOT acceptable to the fans, or to the guys in the locker room who signed long-term contracts with promises from our owners that we were working twoards heading for greatness(championchip contention).

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
10:39 am

Calipari, cheating? Memphis Tigers, tainted? There’s a shock! And if anyone at Kentucky acts surprised and dismayed about this news, well, they need to go and buy a freakin’ clue. I’ll admit, I was ticked off at Kentucky for the way that ran off Tubby Smith and I wish nothing but 10+ years of heart-ache for that fan base. And it feels like they are about to get that and then some. They better start checking the SAT scores and grades for all of their primo recruits… and the banking accounts for their parents, too.

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
10:48 am

Ray, to comment on the discussion about Coach and GM being on the same page, you wonder if Woody and BK were ever on the same page. When Woody was an assistant coach with LB, those teams were half-court oriented/defensive minded grind it out. But all the players BK chose were swingmen who could create mismatches and get up and down the floor. If that was BK’s vision, I dont know why he thought Woody would be the man for the job, when his experience suggested otherwise. Or why did he continue to draft these guys knowing Woody needs guys to play in the half-court.

I guess one page that both he and Woody were on is the “pass up Chris Paul and Deron Williams, but sign Chris Paul’s backup” page. But that page has been beaten to death lol.

I think it will be tough for the Hawks to have the success they did last year, unless they make some moves. We saw teams get injured, make some trades, had a first time coach etc. It is very possible that these teams (Bucks, Wizards, Bulls, Sixers etc.) will be better next year. And the Hawks cant afford to stand pat.

The Truth

May 28th, 2009
10:50 am

Guys I am really enjoying the comments on these blogs lately. So much so, I haven’t had the need to make any comments of my own. I am just enjoying the reads. However, I do have a few thoughts about Mr. Sund

I’M WONDERING; CAN WE CALL HIM A DRAMA QUEEN YET? Not just because of his action as a GM but because of his inaction as well. This year just as last year, it seems Sund is only positioning to acquire the left over talents. With all of these great ideas from bloggers and sport pundits about the Hawks roster needs to get better by additions and/or subtractions, Sund actions and/or inactions might lead us into the out house instead of the penthouse next season. I hope not and I hope I’m wrong As I reflect of his tenure so far, the only move that have paid off was Flip Murray and perhaps he got lucky. Flip emerged as a major contributor for us. Most of the time, his role was playing Robin to Batman-JJ against a measly 1-year 1.5M salary. If that was part of Sund master plan, why didn’t he really pay Flip and tie him up with a multi-year contract deal? I say, Flip came to him by accident and not part of any strategy. The Mo Evans move, in my opinion was the strategy move and was a waste considering his pay of 2.5M per year for 3 years. Let’s face it; Mo is small as a SF and too inconsistent as a scoring option. I will give him a C+ on defense. In hind-sight, Flip should have had the multi-year deal and Mo Evan should have had the one-year deal. The other moves Sund have made with Gardner and Hunter have been questionable D-league type decisions. If you combined their salaries, the 1.5M might have yielded us a better more productive veteran NBA player. If these players aren’t re-signed, then his experiment with them would have failed. We have been begging for a quality big and Sund got us a 4th option (in the rotation) Morris who rarely plays for nearly a 1M per year for the next 2 years. As I recalled, the Morris acquisition was also an accident. Just what big (if any) was he really looking at prior to signing Morris? He also stressed us all out with very long and dramatic (made for film production) negotiations involving the Joshes as he fumble the ball with chill. He made no moves for a quality backup for Josh Smith at times burning him out. He sat and waited while all the quality NBA FA talents got picked up by other teams before the 08/09 season started. He pulled inaction on us again during the trading deadline and decided we didn’t need any additions to the roster while our injured starters struggled in the playoff. Yes, we got the 4th seed. Perhaps that was the result of acquiring Flip Murray by accident (on the cheap) and a healthy Bibby in a weak eastern conference. You be the judge. Way to go Sund; now we must pay Flip Robin-like money to keep him. His agent will make sure of that. If Sund tries to play hard ball with Flip, he will lose as other teams have seen his value off the bench. Hell even Detroit may want him back and pay big money. Let’s not kid ourselves about a bad economy; quality FA role players will be extremely hot this summer. These playoffs have revealed the importance of the role players; perhaps even more so then the superstars. Look at superstars Lebron and Kobe and their struggling role players compared to Orlando distributed offense. So with Sund, will the drama continue?

Now here we are, discussing the upcoming draft, free agency, trades and salaries etc. as they relate to the Hawks upcoming season and our desire for the team to get better. If Sund last year pattern is any indication of our prospects for the upcoming season, than perhaps we should tone down our optimism. However, I will give Sund the benefit of my doubts. Because we have all bared witness to the BK 13 win-misery, any GM changes will probably be considered improvements relatively speaking. So while we are all speculating, discussing and developing these very thoughtful ideas for the Hawks to improve, Sund’s actions and/or inactions will be in the spotlight and will speak much louder than anything he says or doesn’t say during interviews.

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
10:52 am

Astro,

Makes you wonder how can one coach (who name is not Nick Nolte) get all thoses Blue Chipper recuits in the same year….

Egins26Ali

May 28th, 2009
11:00 am

I love the Charlie V. idea. I hope the Hawks truly consider it. I still think a center like Ryan Hollins or Gortat starting, along with Charlie V, Marvin, Flip, Zaza & AC off the bench give us the depth we need to be serious contenders.

Big Ray

May 28th, 2009
11:01 am

Astro Joe,

Sorry. You’re right. Nothing I said made any sense whatsoever. GMs and coaches sharing common goals, perspectives, being on the same page? Whatever was I thinking? That’s a recipe for disaster, and no organization can function that way. Besides, sharing a common perspective with your coach automatically renders your ability as GM to be a second set of eyes. Everybody knows that. Even worse….my point did not coincide with yours. Dude, I am SO sorry about that.

Sautee,

Those were guys I thought of as well. The thing about Billups is that he changed several teams before becoming what he is now. Strange how the talented O’Neal could barely crack the rotation in Portland but was an instant double-double, followed by a 20-and-10 performer the minute he arrived in Indiana. Geez, I guess the Portland GM either didn’t recognize that his coach had a talented player, or forgot to tell his coach to play him more. Blast it all, WHO DIDN’T GET THE MEMO?!

CP,

You know me. When I get hot on the trail, changing direction is difficult. :)

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
11:02 am

The Truth,

Comeon, are you trying to say our 30 years in the NBA business GM doesn’t have a plan? I’m sure there’s a little birdie (Spirit) chasing after the moving NBA Champion Trophy around in that head of his….

The Truth

May 28th, 2009
11:23 am

Melvin,

His actions speak louder than his 30 resume. If I sound like a hater, for the record, I’m not. I’m just making an observation. I will also sing praise songs when I see the music.

RealSquawk

May 28th, 2009
11:29 am

Astro Joe,

For Billups just looking at his stats it seems to have really happened during his 7th year. That 7th year he was traded to Detroit. And he started about 54 games that 6th year and during that year year he had an increase in stats so it seems around there.

Sautee,

At first I thought you were completely wrong on that Devin Harris, but I checked the stats and yes he absolutely did. Jermain Oneal also really increased his stats as well. And yes it was directed at Josh. I don’t think he can’t improve, but I don’t think he will here (in this system) and if that is the case trade him before anybody else figures it out.

What it really boils down to is this. In each of those example the players were traded. Whether that was used as motivation for the players, a change in system, a change in scenery, a change in management or a combination of all those change appears to be necessary.

ILL-logical

May 28th, 2009
11:29 am

The sad part about watching the otherwise captivating conference championships is the overt desire of the NBA to market the “stars” to generate revenue rather than letting the best teams prove their superiority on the court.

Iknow,I know ,the NBA is a business and their first responsibility is make aprofit but do they have to stoop to the level of the WWF ?

The league’s actions do not favor the Hawks aspirations for a championship because,frankly, they have no such stars and are unlikely to get any in the near term.

Whether it’s management or money or the combo platter, until or unless the locals can get the players who can get the critical calls to always go their way then the Hawks will not be on the receiving end of the Larry O’ Brien trophy anytime soon.

Oh, and thanks I meant Gotak not Borak, whomever that is.

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
11:30 am

I agree Truth. I want to see results from him as well.

Big Ray

May 28th, 2009
11:37 am

Kirk,

So glad you enjoyed the humor! :) And thanks for expounding so well on the concept of a GM and coach working so well together. I realize that one is the boss of the other, but both positions are management positions, and more often than not…one cannot do the job of the other. How many coaches make good GMs? How many GMs can do a good job as coaches? Kevin McHale looks like maybe he’s a better coach than he is a GM. Pat Riley excelled (and failed at times) at both. Don Nelson pretty much controls both spots while only working one. A GM needs a good coach, no matter how good he is at talent evaluation. He needs a coach that fits what he wants to do. A coach needs a good GM, as he is the guy who will go out and do what is necessary to get that coach the things he needs.

Bottom line: when organizations have people in those two positions that can larely stay on the same page…they have a good chance at success. Now of course, there are exceptions. If you have two morons running the joint, you have no hope. You can have a GM who is clueless and just does whatever. Meanwhile, his coach is just as clueless, and the chain of bad management continues. But now I’m getting off track here…

I would say that both guys don’t have to be on the same page about every single thing, as both are supposed to be experts in their field, and will have a difference of opinion on some things, which is healthy. But the basic concepts, the basic builing blocks? There has to be some common ground here or it just won’t work.

Why buy new/different/upgraded tools for your mechanic, when all he will do is look at them askance, then turn to other tools (perhaps ones that don’t work as well, or as efficiently) and use them exclusively, instead? On the flip side, how can a mechanic get a job done if the tools you bought for him aren’t the right kind for the job you assigned to him?

Your questions about Sund, and the roster he will be working on, have much merit. Where IS he going with all of this? Like you said, either Woody is part of the scene, or he’s not. It really does make you wonder what Sund has in mind when he begins making his moves. Perhaps we’ll know once he gets some stuff done. And another question is, if any near-future modifications aren’t done for Woody’s benefit, WHO are they being done for?

O’brien,

I’ve often questioned that myself. Why indeed DID Billy hire Woody? I have no clue, as Billy was an enigma on a GOOD day. I guess the bigger question is when did they get to the point where they were NOT on the same page? Since we don’t know when Billy first tried to fire him, there’s no sense in speculating. Reportedly, they did agree (at least to some degree) on not drafting CP3 or Deron. I remember reading that Woody felt that Deron was too slow and overweight, and CP3 was too short and not strong enough. I can’t remember what Billy said. Who knows if he could think past his perpetual hard-on for swingman. All HE needed to hear was “..don’t want either of those top two pgs.” Off to the races after that…

Woody says he has had good meetings with Sund. That would make you think that they are of like mind on at least a few topics/ideas/concepts. But no extension. Heh. Sorry, but that leaves nothing but room for speculation, ya know? Hell, what else do we do around here? :)

doc

May 28th, 2009
11:38 am

truth, speaks truth, funny you should say the east was weak, even at that the 6ers with a coaching change and the miami rebuilds on two rooks almost caught us.

yup rather be lucky than good.

Big Ray

May 28th, 2009
11:38 am

Melvin,

I have to admit, that visual was funny as hell.

Big Ray

May 28th, 2009
11:46 am

RealSquawk,

I think a lot of teams can see where Josh fits, and where he doesn’t. I don’t think you have to worry about them figuring out that he doesn’t fit so well in a half court system like ours that is heavy on the guard involvement. Not to mention a system that does anything but define individual roles, and modify them as necessary.

Josh certainly has his shortcomings. But there are teams (or perhaps I should add “systems”) where his strengths can be consistently exploited, and his weaknesses scaled back considerably. Between that, his nearly unparalleled athletic ability, and the still lurking potential, he’s got great trade value. The question is, and will always be, what do you get for him that is a better fit for THIS team? And will what you get be around for a while (not one or two years). Will it help you to get better and maintain an even higher level of success?

If it’s out there and can be had (and I think these options DO exist), then I say LET’S GO GET IT!

Then again, if your idea is to keep the “core” of this team intact, then you can stop right there.

The Truth,

Your post at 10:50 was off the chain. Bravo…

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
11:48 am

RealSquawk,

I would say the difference in those guys (minus Harris) and Josh is that Josh has produce and continue to increase his production (excluding this season b/c of his injury) over the years and was one of the most consistent/major contributor for both of the Hawks playoffs appearences. Those other guys did not make the impact on their original team like Josh did…

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
12:25 pm

RealSquawk, much like I believe that Francouer would be well-served by leaving his home town, I do think that Smith would benefit from that too. But don’t get me wrong, I’m not anxious to trade him. I cheer for the Hawks not a single player. Smith would be better served by leaving Atlanta (IMO) but the Hawks may not be better served by trading him. That is very different than my feelings about Acie (at this point). I do think that Acie leaving the Hawks would be beneficial to team and player. Player for obvious reasons and team because presumably, it will force them to idenify another “PG of the future” who is hand-picked by the current GM (and hopefully can earn the support of his teammates).

Lastly, most of us who have lived in different places know the benefit of having that life experience. And those of us who moved away from home know how much it forced a certain growth in our personal lives. So your comment that some of those guys reached another level of performance after a trade is not at all surprising.

Ray, I never would dispute the benefits of having GM and coach in lock-step. I just don’t know that in a very narrow discussion of evaluating Acie, that it is a requirement.

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
1:17 pm

I am the last guy to defend Woody & Sund, but you cannot make a valid argument for overpaying guys that make the minimum salary. You can question putting them on the team, but you have to pay RandMo, Hunter, Gardner, & Mario at least the league minimum which increases with each year of service.

If Woody and Sund do not get on the same page, we all suffer. At some point the plan of most guys with these well paid sports jobs is to try to keep your job especially if you have underperformed.

That helps me to understand how Woody can forget his summer plans for the team by Thanksgiving each year. It goes back to kirkinga’s deal about leaving him dangling in the wind. He has had his last call at the bar glass for 2 going on 3 years.

Sund got here and didn’t want to push for something because he showed up at last call. That made it easy to use his I don’t bid, but I do match strategy for the Joshes last summer. Now that he has been here, he will have to make a stand, but I think he knows that if the roster looks junky to Woody, Sund has a problem given that the ASG have clearly sided with Woody over the years.

Sund doesn’t need to create a good roster–he needs a Woody friendly roster. That way if it doesn’t work, he can successfully do what BK could not…toss Woody under the bus.

The Flip side of the deal is the less happy Woody is with the roster, the more likely Sund sits under the bus and Woody rides on. Continued improvement means improved power for Woody

Looping back, doesn’t that annual tender offer for Josh hang around Sund’s neck like Spirit the Hawk after the big escape? Less cap room and no player to show for it…but get me a good team without being able to use all of your cap space at the start of free agency.

I doubt the Falcons are plotting to throw anyone under the bus, just make moves to get higher on the NFL food chain.

BWAF

jwilli120

May 28th, 2009
1:21 pm

hello everyone what i didn’t hear anyone talk about is how the ASG is
gonna say how much money they lost this year, thus costing us any chance
to sign some of the talent out there that could help us get to the next level, anyone think the ASG is happy with just getting to the second round? To get to the next level it’s gonna cost us( look at the elite
teams payroll) i just don’t see it with this group and this GM( the puppet), Woodson did a great job getting the hawks where we are now i
don’t think he has the ability (coaching ) to coach us to the ELITE
level (ask COY Mike Brown) how hard it is and he has the chosen one
i think the ASG will stand pat and try to cheap us back into the playoffs with what we got, they will say play ACIE we spent alot of money getting him here and he’s riding the pine why should we spent and
lose more money with the economy the way it is, and the fans really didn’t show up until the 2nd round IMO LOL, I just don’t think we will go anywhere until some of the ownership and coaching issues are resolved
IMO, THEY ARE GONNA PULL THE WOOL OVER OUR EYES WATCH AND SEE……
REMOVE THE WOOL FIRST

jwilli120

May 28th, 2009
1:27 pm

Looks like they better put the Labron and Kobe puppets away. Does Dwight
Howard have a puppet ? LOL

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
1:44 pm

Manny, if you’re right (Sund will look to appease Woody), then Sund will likely select players with 1-2 year contracts. Why invest in a lengthy agreement if you’re already thinking about replacing that coach (and introducing a new scheme) the following year? Yet another reason why having a coach with a long-term commitment (regardless of the coach’s name) makes the most sense going into next season.

Tyger

May 28th, 2009
1:59 pm

Hoops, glad you like the new line-up. Hawks would be over the cap, but not pay luxury tax, which is pretty much the status quo.

Sekou – my apologies to Charlie V., he is a long versatile player that can play w/anybody and would be a great addition.

Obrien – good catch, I realized it after hitting the button, but didn’t feel like posting a correction.

2009-2010

PG Jamaal Crawford Flip Murray AC Law
SG Joe Johnson Mo Evans Morris Almond
SF Josh Smith Marvin Williams #19 Terrence Williams
PF Al Horford Drew Gooden Othello Hunter
C ZaZa Pachulia Randolph Morris #49 Garrett Siles

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
2:13 pm

Tyger,

I like that Morris Almond suggestion. He’s the type of talent that a good team will be acquire as a 10-12th guy on the bench. I was very impress with him in the summer leagues. He has a smoothe offensive game and was the odd man out in Utah b/c they were loaded with wing players….

I MUS.WRITE

May 28th, 2009
2:16 pm

Ray….Put the gun down or ill have to call the police-Wait you are the police…HAHAHA
All this dialogue about AC…..Why- he wont be here next year, atleast i hope not.Same ol song and dance….Sorry azz owners -Coach and Gm trying to say the right things to avoid looking like idiots….If they were on the same page AC would have played more as Sund seemed to have a man crush on the guy last summer–
Can a Gm impose his will on a team and demand that a certain player gets time….I’ve never heard anything like that.

I dont know who we can get in free agency when our organization is being run on the cheap-we’ll be lucky to get Flip resigned….Thats a dam shame – same BS is going on -ARE Ya Ready for sum football -I sure am -Go Birds…… Same ol song and dance

ISO JOE………AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

“We just were’nt prepared tonight”

DJ

May 28th, 2009
2:28 pm

I was just thinking if we don’t sign back Mike Bibby who we could sign as a replacement, I thought about this guy.

Jason Kidd.

He could be a free agent this summer. He can rebound,assit, play defense, and score a little bit. Does anyone else agree?

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
2:34 pm

I. MUS.,

About this: “Can a Gm impose his will on a team and demand that a certain player gets time….I’ve never heard anything like that.”

Maybe not about a certain player, but last year when Ed Stefanski took over the 76ers, he apparently ordered Mo Cheeks to “see what he had” in the youngsters on the squad. As a result Thadeus Young, Jason Smith and Louis Williams all got more minutes and the Sixers morphed into the running, athletic squad they have now.

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
2:52 pm

I. MUS, when the GM is talking to a coach with a short contract, yeah, I think he absolutely can influence decisons like playing time. And maybe he did do that. Acie had a nice run last season when he got some decent time and then he came up lame.

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
3:29 pm

Player asset management is a tricky thing when you cannot void contracts like they do in the NFL.

Keep in mind that if the GM does not work to appease the coach when you have to fill 1/2 the roster, he better fill the squad with players that will fit the next coach. So Sund either has to fill the roster to fit Woody or the next guy–who might not take the offer to be the coach. Where would that leave Sund?

It can get messy fast if they do not get their We are the World T-shirts on.

BWAF

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
3:35 pm

Astro Joe,

LOL, When exactly did Acie get some “decent time” last season?

It seemed to me that as soon as he had a good outing, he was not seen for the next several games except in garbage time. But hey, maybe that’s just MY perception, since I thought he was woefully underused.

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
3:47 pm

When Mark Bradley asked Sund about if Woody should get an offensive co-ordinator, he said he leaves it up to the coach. And that seems to be Sund’s MO. He does not tell the coach what kind of team they should be. In fact, Rick Sund said he only focuses on the results. And he was very pleased with the results this year (although there was no talk of an extension).

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
3:53 pm

Sautee, yeah, I went back and looked at the game log. At most, he played 4-5 consecutive games and then disappeared. For some reason, I thought that he had a little 10-12 game streak in there after the ASG, but alas, I was wrong (again). Maybe one of these evenings, I will take the time to summarize his season by DNP-Coaches Decision vs. Injury vs. some playing time. My guess is that he will have about 50 games of some time, 15 DNP-Coaches Decision and 25 DNP-Hurt/Family Issue.

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
4:15 pm

AJ, another thing to keep in mind though is his minutes per game. Sure, he might have gotten some PT in some games, but if all he got was 3 minutes at the end, then that information will be inconclusive. Like you said, it will take some time though.

As far as payroll goes, for the Hawks to get to the level they/we want, they have to go over the salary cap (but stay away from luxury tax of course). Going into next year, Hoopshype has their payroll at $40.9 million (including Marvin’s tender, but not including Chills).

E43

May 28th, 2009
5:01 pm

im really excited about the hawks because i know that there WILL be an upgrade due to the 3 year 20million dollar salary offered to childress is still out there. i understand that the price was cut down due to the arrival of flip+mo but bibby has a good chance of staying and taking less money. all due respect bibby is a great PG but teams are not willing to pay for a depreciating PG, i think hell take less money to stay than to leave. im very hopefull for the hawks. im for childress coming back his fro does a number on opposing teams offenses at least his fro looked like a stanford fro rather than the gangsta detroit version of ben wallace.LOL

E43

May 28th, 2009
5:04 pm

Sautee
i agree he was underused but thats the same as many other hawks players. not to name any names but some of them didnt notch a 48 minutes of playing time all season.

E43

May 28th, 2009
5:11 pm

LouHudaon
nice post at your one of very few people that have come up with something reasonable that doesnt involve trading everyone and everything including up to jerious norwood

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
5:12 pm

O’brien, true, you’d have to choose a baseline, like at least 10 minutes or something like that. Maybe it will be a weekend project, rather work on that than paint my garage.

But the other thing is that because of Flip, Acie almost became the 4th PG on the team. Bibby/Joe/Flip/Acie was likely the practical depth chart for that position. Bibby/Joe/Flip could all take turns playing either the 1 or 2 with each other and I don’t think that anyone can question that those 3 were better options than Acie. I say that because in those games when Acie may have only played 5 minutes, it is not likely that Bibby played 43 minutes. More likely, Flip and Joe receive minutes at the PG position (maybe 4 minutes each) which would have left Bibby playing closer to 35 minutes (which was pretty much his average).

RealSquawk

May 28th, 2009
5:18 pm

Melvin,
Those guys also really didn’t get to play much either, but you might have been saying that.

Astro Joe, I very much agree with all of that. I wasn’t saying Josh needs to be traded I would much rather have a coaching change and to keep the current roster. now addressing the point guard of the future talk, it is not really useful until woody is gone because I haven’t really seen a young point guard woody will play.
Knight gave him three chances. Royal Ivey and average due exactly what I am asked point guard.
Salim Stoudamire small sized shooter with a competitive side. He definitely adjusted to woody and did what he was told in those later seasons. He still didn’t play.
Acie Law is a combination of the two. He is bigger and a better defender than i thought. He can shoot and penetrate.

This is a big what if, but do you really think we could sing Chris paul’s praises or deron Williams if they were playing for Woody. THEY would have been sitting just like the rest and those are two of the best point guards in the league.

If we simply retained are current pieces (Zaza, Bibby, and Flip and MARVIN) and brought up David Anderson and josh Childress then we would have a pretty competitive team.

Either way everything is going to be harder for us next year we aren’t coming off some big grand stand we are coming off being SWEPT out of the playoffs from a team that was almost SWEPT out of the playoffs

This is that NEXT year where we see what everybody is made of. Does the coach adjust. do the players come ready? Is everything in order before training camp?

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
5:55 pm

EJ43,

You are correct, but Acie’s the only lottery pick among them.

Two words: asset management.

From that aspect, I don’t think anyone’s worried about guys we’re paying minimum salary to.

darrell starks

May 28th, 2009
6:05 pm

I couldnt never understand woodson philosophy it didnt make much sense to me on why woody never brought in acie to replace bibby at the point and bring in flip at big guard to replace joe and not let him play so many min during the year.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
6:06 pm

Not that this reflects on his ability to be a GM, but I was surprised when I saw it. I am pretty confident that BK would not do this. I’d be surprised if Sund did it. It is a way to play nice with the fan base.

From Ed Stefanski, last season.
http://blog.nj.com/sixersshots/2008/06/from_the_desk_of_ed_stefanski.html

I mention Sefanski for two reasons–the Sixers have been in a similar place to the Hawks during the past 2 seasons, and he has a roster on the rise if he can find a reasonable replacement for his aging free agent PG.

As a season ticket holder, the most positive thing I have heard about Sund in a year is that he is more media friendly than BK. Unless I missed one of the special events, his visibility to season ticket holders was less than BK this season. That was supposedly due to an elevator malfunction.

I look forward to the Sund excitement this summer. He’s got a lot of work to do.

BWAF

BrittishAnger

May 28th, 2009
6:07 pm

GLW,
I can see some of what you’re talking about with the Cav’s series, since we probably only had 10 Fast Break points in all four games (maybe 15, but I’m giving it the benefit of the doubt), but since Lebron and squad used that technique against us, and unless we were hoping for a classic Phoenix Suns styled playoff series (one where both teams scored over a hundred each game), our only hope of slowing them down was to have a better half-court design to combat it, which we didn’t. I do like our team when they get out and run, but you can’t rely on one tactic to compete in this league, and the nights when we couldn’t get out and run (playoff and regular season games) helped prove that Sund’s thinking on the 50-50 mix is the right way to go. In a retreat from the player side of the game, I’ve heard plenty of folks talk about bringing in an offensive coordinator to help draw some new plays into the fold and get things out of the stagnant “Run it through Joe” schemes we have now. The only thing I wish, and it’s something the league needs to consider to help the game grow around the world as much as at home, is inter-league play in the offseason, not just for championship teams but especially for some of the lower rung teams who need some extra chemistry (and the Hawks could use it just as well as Boston did during their pre-championship summer). Give me a legit 10 deep team next year with some new offensive schemes, and we’ll have a far more manageable time in the first round, and hopefully not get pwned in the second….

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
6:14 pm

Astro Joe,

Saved you the time. Here’s what Acie averaged in the 12 games where he played at least 15 minutes (which Ray and I were both begging for).

7.2 points, 2.4 rebounds, and an excellent 3.1 assists to 0.75 turnovers. (better than 4/1 assist / TO ratio)

Now you can paint that garage! ;-)

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
6:26 pm

I still marvel at the people who bash Sund for the way he handled Chill/Mo/Flip. All right – what would you have done differently? Sign Chill to a contract that no other NBA team was willing to pay? Sign Flip to a contract he’d never accept (read: No way Flip would have signed a 3-year deal at just $1.5-2M)? And are you seriously saying that Mo isn’t worth 2 years at $2.5M (barely 40% of the mid-level)?

This team improved by 10 games with the payroll remaining essentially the same. What results were you expecting? An NBA title, just 1 year after we won 37 games? Will you not give the man credit unless he trades Acie Law for Chris Paul (”Judas for Jesus,” with a hat tip to MannyT) and signs LeBron James for the minimum salary? I’m only being half-facetious. What standard of success are you holding Sund to if “10-win improvement while keeping payroll constant” does not satisfy you?

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
6:54 pm

Nire,

I would have felt differently if Sund had offered even a low-ball offer to Chills BEFORE sending him out to “look” for an offer for the Hawks to match. It’s a matter of being proactive and not reactive. We had done that ALREADY with Josh Smith. It would have sent a totally different message to Chills. Perhaps if he felt respected, even if he disagreed with the amount of the offer, then some middle ground could have been found.

Isn’t that what the Falcons are doing? Being proactive?

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
8:09 pm

We really dont know (for sure) how the negotiations between Sund and Chills started, plus Sund was the new Man on the block, so I will give him a pass last offseason. This time, he had one whole year to evaluate (coach and players), so he needs to make his imprint on the team.

Sautee, I think those numbers from Acie are pretty good based. In 35 mpg, Bibby only averaged 5 assists, 3.5 rebounds (compared to 3 assists and 2.5 rebounds). I know that Acie played against mostly bench players, but still. 2 years in, and we still dont know exactly what kind of player he will be. Keep in mind that he won the Bob Cousy award (best PG in college) his senior year, so all these PG’s people have the Hawks drafting (at 19), who knows how they’re going to turn out, especially playing for Woody.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
8:22 pm

I’ve seen a lot of people around here say that Chill wouldn’t have left unless he felt disrespected. I think that’s BS. He didn’t go out seeking the Greek offer. The Greeks came to him, and for good reason – they knew that no American team would be willing to offer what they would. To match what the Greeks gave him, we would have had to pay him close to $9M/yr (since the Greek team pays his taxes, something an American team obviously couldn’t do). There was no way he was staying here for less than $7M/yr, and probably no way he’d have stayed for less than $7.5M.

And in any case, the Hawks DID make him an offer, which Childress rejected as too low. So you still haven’t answered my question: Why should we have overpaid to keep him if Sund thought we could get the same production or (as it turned out) better while spending less money?

And again, there’s no way the Mo signing was in panic. As I said, deals don’t happen in less than 36 hours, which was the time between the finalizing of Chill’s contract to play in Greece and the finalizing of the signing of Mo.

Also, the signing of Flip was not blind or lucky. Every NBA GM worth his salt knows that there will be a dozen or so decent rotation players lying around in mid-August. It happens every single year. And it’s not too hard in mid-July to look around the free agent market and figure out who it’ll be. It happened to Jim Jackson 4 or 5 times, Gary Payton in 2005, Donyell Marshall a couple times, etc. So even if Sund didn’t know that Flip specifically would still be available in mid-August (although given the fact that he played under Sund in Seattle already, you gotta figure Flip was at least on Sund’s radar), he knew he would be able to get a guy like Flip at Flip’s price.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
8:31 pm

O’Brien,

I think if Acie had hit a higher percentage of his jumpers when he was on the court, Woody would have trusted him a little more. So some of it definitely is on Acie.

His situation was exacerbated by the fact that Flip could give Woody minutes at the 1. Unfortunately for the TEAM, when Flip played the 1, he turned the ball over too much, and it robbed him of his natural aggressiveness on offense.

It was not until the Miami playoff series that Flip found the right balance while playing the 1. And by then he HAD to, because Acie was out with his back.

I still feel confident that if Woody had suffered through Acie’s shooting woes, we’d now have a “better than most” backup point who will only get better as he goes. Personally I hope we keep him, but if not, we MUST address the future at PG this summer.

Status quo on that issue has the potential to doom the team in 2011 and beyond.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
8:40 pm

Niremetal,

So let me get this straight. You’re saying that Sund knew in advance that he didn’t want Chills, and was already negotiating with Mo’s agent BEFORE Chills offer was made public?

If THAT’S the case, why not approach Chills early on and say “this is not your optimum place to be, and we’re going to look for a sign-and-trade? If that happened BEFORE the Greeks came a callin’, perhaps we’d have Barbosa, or another asset instead of nada.

You were asking how else, so tell us, if YOU were Sund in that situation, what would YOU have done to not waste a lottery pick?

Which IS what looks like will happen. A wasted asset.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
8:45 pm

Nire,

about this also: “And in any case, the Hawks DID make him an offer, which Childress rejected as too low. ”

Relative to the Greek offer, yes. But had we offered something around the MLE before the season ended, who knows? At THAT point, he wouldn’t have had anything to compare that offer to. Maybe his agent would have told him he was crazy, BUT, this was the only organization he’s ever known. You never know, but I’d rather see us be proactive in every situation, rather than p!ss away an asset.

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
8:50 pm

Sautee, good stuff. But I’ll be breaking down Mario West’s defensive impact before I get to that garage.

Manny, that’s a great marketing ploy that Stefanski is doing with season-ticketholders. You may recall that the ASG fired their Marketing guru. I personally doubt that Stefanski came up wth that idea by himself. Sounds like someone fixated on retaining customers, and one would hope that the GM has other things on his plate, like hiring a head coach (and the 76ers Marketing genius is worried about reducing churn). Anyway, that’s pretty cool.

RealSquawk

May 28th, 2009
8:52 pm

yeah so I am going to go out on a limb and say that the refs are being a little preferential. And hmmm. maybe Z should get a technical. maybe

RealSquawk

May 28th, 2009
8:52 pm

just a little not much though

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
9:04 pm

Sautee,

1) We were not allowed to offer him anything between October 31, 2007 and July 1, 2008.

2) I would have tried to sign-and-trade him if the deal would have brought anything significant. But anyone who said that the Suns offered Barbosa or anyone comparable is lying out of their a$$. If the deal would have forced us to take on a bad contract in return or player(s) we couldn’t use, I wouldn’t have done it. Same if the trade brought us a player like Raja Bell, who might crack the rotation, but why take on his $5M/2yr contract when we could get Flip for $1.5M and be just as well off? Making a trade under those circumstances would just be worse than letting him go for nothing.

The press reports said that there were a few sign-and-trade offers involving Chill that were discussed. But keep in mind that WE aren’t the only ones who make the decision on a sign-and-trade. Childress has to agree to the deal too. My guess is that no team made an offer that both 1) paid Childress enough to make it worth it for him to stay; and 2) gave us something of positive value. Beyond that, I admit that I have no proof, except for the fact that Sund got us what we needed to be successful for this year, so I assume he didn’t turn off his phone when he got feasible trade offers.

Under the circumstances, I would have done exactly what I suspect Sund did – offered Chill as much as he was worth to us. If that wasn’t good enough for him and he couldn’t get better from another NBA team, I would have let him walk.

It’s not a “wasted asset” if there was no way the asset could have positive value for us. Signing Childress to a $7M or more contract would have put us over the luxury cap threshold AND strapped us to the deck on the free agent market for the next 4-5 years. Under those circumstances, there was no feasible alternative that would have made the team better off.

So I’m still waiting. Someone tell me a feasible alternative. If you can’t, then just say that the NBA free agency and salary cap rules are stupid. Don’t bash Sund for not making trades that couldn’t have happened or not signing contracts that no NBA team would have signed.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
9:20 pm

Nire,

I DO realize that Sund was not here until after the season ended, but I was speaking of the organization (read: BASG) needing to be proactive. I think Billy knew he was a lame duck at that point, so perhaps that led to a laissez faire attitude in his last days.

At any rate, if it was clear to Sund that he had no need / want for Chills, why not take that bull by the horns, and let him know (he!l, get him on board) that a sign-and trade was in the works?

By the way Sund had publicly said that his intention was to re-sign both Joshes, so that doesn’t exactly gibe with negotiating with Mo PRIOR to the Greek offer now does it?

Surely he’s not THAT devious?

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
9:26 pm

niremetal, at the time, I dont think Sund knew that Flip would be available, so I think he got lucky in that regards. Sure, he probably had his eye on Mo Evans, but I think Mo was about to sign with Golden State. To get him to come to the Hawks, Sund offered him 2 years (with a player option for the 3rd year) at $2.5 mil. Do we really want Mo Evans for 3 years? How many impact plays has Mo Evans made (offensively or defensively)?

We still dont know if Chills really wanted to come back and play for Woody (because Chills said he had no chance at starting). And we dont know what those offers for Chills were. All we know is that Sund told Chills to go out and get a better offer, and he did.

I would have loved to have all 3; Chills, Mo Evans, and Flip. Either way, Sund has to make some early moves this time around (be proactive) and not be reactive like he was last year.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
9:28 pm

Sautee,

It wasn’t SUND who wasn’t allowed to act. It was the HAWKS. There is a rule stating that if you want to re-sign a player slated to become a restricted free agent, you must do so by October 31 of the year BEFORE he becomes a free agent. Otherwise, you can’t make any offers to that player OR trade that player before July 1.

And the statement does jive with it perfectly, for one of two reasons. First, Sund isn’t as stupid as Hammond on the Bucks is. He’s like all the smart GMs in the league – they ALL say that their top priority is to re-sign their free agents and to say that they’ll match all offers. That forces other teams to call you and inquire about trade possibilities. Case in point – the Suns probably had no intention of re-signing JJ in 2005 for more than $9M/yr, but they told everyone in the league that their top priority was re-signing JJ and that they’d match any offer for him. And despite the fact that he was probably bluffing…well, we all remember that.

Second, Sund might have honestly had every intention of re-signing Chill, but once it became clear that that would cost $8M instead of $6M (thanks to the Greek offer to overpay him and pay his taxes), he might have thought better of it. I sure as hell would have.

Remember, we’re not the only team that this happened to last year. Pargo bolted New Orleans and Arroyo bolted Orlando last year for Europe. And those guys didn’t get paid way above the MLE like Chill did. But I guess those GMs are also dumbasses who don’t know how to use their assets.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
9:39 pm

Nire,

BTW my last post was written BEFORE I read your 9:04. Watching the game and got distracted. But it was NOT intended as an answer to your 9:04, but a further response to your earlier posts.

And I found this and want your reaction:

TrueHoop: “The NBA’s collective bargaining agreement includes a ton of complicated clauses. Each serves a purpose, and you can make a case that, all told, it’s a good and fairly fair system. But regulation is always burdensome, and this league, famously run by lawyers, is knee-deep in legalese. In this instance, those rules created a really weird deal. According to Josh Childress, there were championship-contending NBA teams that were willing to pay him more than the Hawks would. A sign-and-trade couldn’t be worked out, so Childress was stuck. But that makes a situation where here’s an employee, a place that wanted to employ him, and an agreed upon price. In normal human life, that’s all you need to make a deal. You can only tinker with the free market so much before it starts depressing normal economic activity. This is one of those cases. A rule (essentially, the salary cap) designed solely to keep NBA teams competitive with each other now ends up helping a whole different league.”

At the same site was this: Lang Whitaker, SLAM Online: “… I don’t think it needed to come to this. The Hawks didn’t have to pay him as much as he’s making in Greece, but they had to pay him something, anything. It just wasn’t happening, according to Josh. ‘I had conversations with Rick and ownership and that was my number one goal to return to Atlanta,’ Josh said. ‘But I wanted to get my contract done early, but when that didn’t happen, I was kind of forced to explore my options.’”

So, Nire does this sound like he felt respected?

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
9:48 pm

And to be PERFECTLY CLEAR, I NEVER would have paid Chills what he got in Greece. NEVER!

Good for him that he got a big payday, but that would have been insane.

And I’ll concede that the rules hamstrung Sund a bit in this case. Thanks for the explanation.

But I’ll wonder forever what if we had offered $5.5M on July 1st what might have happened. We’ll never know.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
9:55 pm

Childress’s quote doesn’t sound like a man disrespected. He sounds like a man who couldn’t get paid what he thought he was worth. But that’s life. The Hawks thought they could make better uses of $7-8M/yr than spending it all on Josh Childress. The fact that other teams were willing to offer “more” doesn’t mean jack if those other teams didn’t have the cap space to sign him and only offered the Hawks useless players or bad contracts in a sign-and-trade.

Lang Whitaker, Sekou’s plaudits notwithstanding, talks out of his a$$ as much as the folks on ESPN do. His articles are 60% fact, 40% opinion. The portion where he says that “The Hawks didn’t have to pay him as much as he’s making in Greece, but they had to pay him something, anything.” is clearly opinion, because the Hawks DID offer Childress something. It just wasn’t nearly as much as the Greeks offered. Whitaker and most of the people who follow the NBA are too set in their views of the basketball world to fathom how a solid NBA player could choose to play in Europe unless he was disrespected by NBA teams.

But just because Whitaker says it doesn’t make it true, particularly with a player as smart and worldly as Childress. Childress was a unique case – a well-rounded player who did everything well but nothing great. No NBA team in a position to sign him or trade useful assets for him was willing to pay him more than ~$6.5M. The Greek team offered him the equivalent of a $9M+ American contract. Take that monetary gap and add on the fact that Childress is a smart, wordly guy who loves the idea of globetrotting, and it makes perfect sense that he’d choose to jump overseas for a couple years.

I’ll let you in on a little secret. If a Greek, Italian, or Spanish law firm offered me a 30% pay raise and the opportunity to travel Europe and bask in the Mediterranean sun for 3 years, it wouldn’t take my current employer “disrespecting” me to take the deal. I’m sure most unmarried young guys would feel the same way.

I’m enjoying this, btw. Keep it coming ;-) .

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
10:01 pm

Nire,

“The Greeks came to him, and for good reason – they knew that no American team would be willing to offer what they would. To match what the Greeks gave him, we would have had to pay him close to $9M/yr (since the Greek team pays his taxes, something an American team obviously couldn’t do).”

You’re right, Olympiacos did make the initial contact to Childress agent. However, they also reach out to other players as well and only Childress fail for their sales pitch (and I wonder why)? Also note that up to 15 teams contacted Chill’s agent and he said the Hawks had drag their feet during negotiations. So to imply that Sund couldn’t have handle this situation differently is crazy b/c there was options on the table for him to explore had he not overplayed his hand. Also, if he’s able to workout a S&T this offseason then it only confirmed the fact that he drop the ball last summer as he wasted salary cap space on an imaginery player. Finally, you are ignoring the fact that Chills preference was/is to play in the NBA, so had the Hawks resolved his contract situation quicker than Europe would not have been an option (negotiations dragged for weeks) so to say that another NBA team would have to pay 7,8,9 million to match the Europe offer is your attempt to mislead us with evidence that occurred after the fact. (i.e. quicker decisions by the Hawks, no Europe offer to match)…

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/sports/basketball/12childress.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

You mean to tell me that Speedy was going to make more money the Chills (keep in mind Smoove hadn’t signed yet).

“Atlanta general manager Rick Sund said that while he believes the Hawks made a proposal that was competitive within the NBA, it would have been fiscally irresponsible to try to match Olympiacos. Sund wouldn’t reveal the exact numbers of Atlanta’s offer. But he said it exceeded the salary cap’s midlevel exception, which is more than $5.5 million, and would have made Childress the team’s fourth highest paid player.”

Astro Joe

May 28th, 2009
10:02 pm

nire, these back and forth debates are terrific, aren’t they? I’ve been known to enter into a few now and then myself. Ya’ll keep it up, I’m enjoying reading the good stuff.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:04 pm

And PS, here’s a segment of Sekou’s article on the signing:

Former Hawks swingman Josh Childress had no idea he’d be the pioneer he appears to be today, the morning after signing a three-year, $32.5- million contract with Greek powerhouse Olympiakos, rather than accepting a deal from the Hawks.

Childress, 25, is the first player at this stage of his NBA career to spurn the world’s most high-profile basketball stage for one of its international alternatives.

Atlanta had offered him a five-year, $33 million contract. But the Hawks’ slow-paced negotiating tactics and the limits of restricted free agency, combined with what Childress called Wednesday the “opportunity of a lifetime,” resulted in his decision.

And before you jump on the “slow-paced negotiating” comment, ask yourself this: What more would there be to discuss? We offered the man 5 years at $6.6M/year. The Greek team came to him with a deal that was way more than that. We probably couldn’t have gotten him for less than $7.5M, and certainly not for less than $7M. So again – why should we have had a sense of urgency about those negotiations? Why shouldn’t we have instead focused our energy on finding, say, a swingman defensive specialist willing to play for a 2 year, $2.5M contract?

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
10:11 pm

How about a round of I Believe in Magic! Cleveland just cannot put Orlando down. This is the difference between playing the Hawks and the Magic. Most of our playoff games were decided in the 1st quarter. Orlando never seems to be out of the game early.

niremetal & Sautee – you two are cracking me up. It’s like watching a rerun of late July 2008.

I’d give you this parallel for the Chills/Sund situation.

1-If you get to the bar early, you get a larger selection of ladies to chat with if you choose to do so. If you chat up a nice lady early who isn’t the top tier woman in the place, she may appreciate you more.

2-If you get to her after being blown off by others first, you are in trouble if she noticed your prior failures.

3-If you don’t talk to anyone, maybe the ladies think you have alternate interests or personal preferences. They definitely won’t think more of you if your conversation doesn’t start until she is about to leave with another guy.

If Sund wanted Chills to feel wanted, he should not have given him that #3 treatment. If Sund gives any of his free agents the #1 treatment, he might get a hometown discount or a quick commitment if the player doesn’t want to play the waiting game. Sometimes, an active courtship from the guy/team with less money, but more interest works.

niremetal, notice that neither Sautee nor I said blow your bar budget/cap space in situation #1…and you also have to factor in that the other ladies in the bar (i.e. future free agents on this team) were watching the style of negotiation.

Time will tell if he can improve that rep this summer.

Maybe he is the guy with the Dos Equis…i.e. the most interesting man in the world ;-)

BWAF, my friends!

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:16 pm

Melvin,

I refer you to my previous 3 posts for answers to the S&T (non-)option, the supposed “disrespect,” and the supposed “feet-dragging.”

As for why Childress took the deal. Uh…because he was Olympiacos’s top choice. Pretty simple. I’ve read about a dozen articles saying that saying that other agents were interested in the deals Olympiacos was offering if Childress turned them down, but that Childress was their top choice. I’ll try to find one of those in a bit, or you can look it up yourself. In any case, for all the reasons I said in my most recent post, Childress was a perfect storm – both in terms of why he made sense for Olympiacos, and for why the contract and opportunity made sense for him.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:18 pm

Manny,

How does a 5-year, $6.6M/yr offer square with #3??

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
10:19 pm

In the article, Childress said he “expected the Hawks to waive his rights and free up cap space”. Interesting, because I dont see the Hawks doing that. Imagine the uproar if we lost the #6 pick in the league for nothing. He averaged 11.8 points off the bench. Not to mention his hustle points (the base-line bandit) and key offensive rebounds.

The Hawks dragged their feet last year with Chills, and I wonder if the Hawks will drag their feet again this year.

RealSquawk

May 28th, 2009
10:20 pm

Was stan van gundy available when Billy was trying to fire Woody.
How nice would the Hawks be if he was at the helm you talk about coming out of half time fired up and adjustments made.

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
10:23 pm

The Hawks offer showed up after Chills had the Greek offer. If that proposal was there before he went to Greece, Chills may have never gotten on the plane.

I compare it to bad service from a business. As long as they don’t upset me enough that I start looking at other options, their service is good enough. As soon as I start comparing what one offers versus the other, my business is now in play and I’m more likely to switch. Sund slow played Chills until he was looking for other options.

BWAF

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:26 pm

Manny,

Source that. I don’t recall ever seeing an article saying that the Hawks’ offer came after the Greek offer.

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
10:26 pm

That offer matches up with 3 because Sund’s initial negotiation position was go out and find offers. If we think they are reasonable we will match. That’s what we get to do because of RFA rules.

Sund didn’t put out the we like you card until Chills was ready to walk out of the bar with the Greek hottie.

BWAF

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
10:27 pm

Manny,

LOL, good stuff. “Stay Thirsty My Friend”. ;-)

Nire,

As I said, I’ll always wonder what might have been had we offered $5.5M on July 1. Who knows, maybe we’re better off the way it is. But I sure miss Chills’ energy.

Here’s yet another post from the site I found. I suspect there are holes in this argument and I’ll trust you and Manny to find them and let us know:

Ziller, FanHouse: “Childress carries a cap hold of $14.5 million. Assuming the Hawks can manage to retain Josh Smith for about $10 million a year, Atlanta figures to be about $20 million under the salary cap next summer. (Mike Bibby and Zaza Pachulia are coming off the books.) That can buy a mighty fine free agent. But unless Atlanta renounces its rights to Childress — meaning Chills would no longer be a restricted free agent, he could sign with any NBA team and the Hawks wouldn’t have matching rights — $14.5 million of that cap space will be locked up in that cap hold. That means Atlanta would have only roughly $5.5 million of space, and that’s less than the mid-level exception. The Hawks would then have no cap space, and would be in the same boat as 85% of the NBA. If the Hawks had overpaid Childress with, say, an $8 million annual contract, they would be able to go get a $12 million player in free agency next year … and they’d have Childress’s production! Instead, nothing and nothing.”

This seems unlikely to me, but how ’bout ’splainin’ why.

And yes, Manny it’s like the good old days of Summer ‘08, but without the acrimony.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:32 pm

HAHAHAHA!!!!! Wow, Sautee. Yeah, whoever this Ziller guy is, he’s talking out of his rear iris. The Hawks’ cap hold on Childress is based on the amount of his last NBA contract, not his current Greek contract. That means that it’s ~$5.7M, not $14M.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:35 pm

Sautee,

You are also assuming that we didn’t offer $5.5M on July 1. We know that the Hawks made an offer that started above the MLE, which was $5.7M last year. So you can strike that off the list. Again, don’t talk from speculation. Find a source when you make assertions that assume that we never offered Josh anything during the opening days of free agency.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
10:38 pm

I knew it sounded wrong, I just didn’t know how.

Still, isn’t that a lot to carry for an invisible man?

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
10:39 pm

Sourced!

I don’t make all of it up;-) I was deep into the Chills watch last summer.

From NY Times link that Melvin provided

He had planned on re-signing with the Hawks, who had said signing him and Josh Smith were off-season priorities. But Childress expected a contract within days of the start of free agency this July, and negotiations dragged on for weeks.

Check out the section titled BLACK EYE FOR THE HAWKS
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/article/122618

BWAF

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:41 pm

Manny,

Your source says that the negotiations dragged on for weeks, not that an initial offer wasn’t made.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
10:44 pm

PS, I was wrongish about the cap hold – it’s about $9M, not $5.7M. It’s not a big deal at all as long as we’re over the cap anyway. And we can renounce Childress as soon as we’re far enough under the cap where it makes a difference. There’s just no need to do that this summer, since we don’t have any cap space anyway.

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
10:49 pm

Nire,
I could be wrong but I think the Sund made a final offer that start above the MLE (which came after the Greek offer). Sund stated that Chills offer would have made him the 4th high paid player on the team (again, Smoove hadn’t signed yet). So you know Bibby and Joe contracts was more than his offer, so who was the next highest paid Hawk at the time???? Hint, Speedy Claxton. Who salary was 5.7 this past season. So its safe to assume that Chills salary was lower than 5.7….

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
10:52 pm

Nire,

Here’s Sund qoute to go with my 10:49 post

“Atlanta general manager Rick Sund said that while he believes the Hawks made a proposal that was competitive within the NBA, it would have been fiscally irresponsible to try to match Olympiacos. Sund wouldn’t reveal the exact numbers of Atlanta’s offer. But he said it exceeded the salary cap’s midlevel exception, which is more than $5.5 million, and would have made Childress the team’s fourth highest paid player.”

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
10:53 pm

I think Chills cap hold is above $9 mil.

His last salary with the Hawks was a little over $3.6 mil. Check chart in Q30 of Larry Coon site.
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q30

Then the part just under that references RFA. Cap hold is at least 2.5 x last salary which would put you just over 9 mil. I am being conservative becuase of the middle column of the chart. If that means below avg salary for all players (=MLE) then you multiply that salary by 3 to get almost $11 mil.

That’s A LOT of Dos Equuis 8-O

BWAF

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
10:57 pm

Nire,

I made no assertions that assumed such.

“Second, Sund might have honestly had every intention of re-signing Chill, but once it became clear that that would cost $8M instead of $6M (thanks to the Greek offer to overpay him and pay his taxes), he might have thought better of it. I sure as hell would have.”

Isn’t THAT talking from speculation? I’ve been enjoying this, but let’s not get into lecturing, ok?

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
10:58 pm

And another thing, who is Sund trying to fool with the statement below:

” Rick Sund said that while he believes the Hawks made a proposal that was competitive within the NBA”…

Now exactly how many teams was under the salary cap that could have made a better offer than the MLE. Keep in mind all the big name FA ha already signed.

Dear Mr. Sund,
We don’t want Savvy word play in the media, we want Championship on the court play…

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
11:01 pm

Looking at the cap space as another version of asset management, half the team is currently free agents. Under normal circumstances that would put you under the cap. Then you get to decide–resign our players or make a big play like Philly and the Clippers (and sort of Memphis) did last summer.

However, holding 9-11 mil of cap space for a guy that you definitely would not sign for anywhere close to that amount makes it very difficult to upgrade your roster even though we currently have less than $41 mil committed to salaries for next season.

Chills is a heavier load in Greece than he ever was in Atlanta.

Sautee, this one’s for you. Next time we meet up, it’s the double X.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bc0WjTT0Ps

BWAF my friends.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
11:03 pm

Danny Crawford is a eunuch. No balls at all.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
11:08 pm

Sautee,

I wasn’t lecturing, and I wasn’t guilty of unclean hands. The portion you posted was a direct response to how Sund’s actions might have “gibed” with his statements. I prefaced my responses by saying “Sund might have,” which is an explicit indication that I’m speculating. I have no problem with speculation per se; only with speculation masked as facts.

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
11:12 pm

Is local sourcing better? The plan was wait and match.
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/bradley/entries/2008/08/08/hawks_can_and_must_keep_smith.html

That, you should know, was the only formal bid the Hawks made before deciding late Friday night to match. As happened with Childress, they dared a free agent to go out and find a better deal. Josh C. found one, albeit in a country bordering the Mediterranean. Josh S. wasn’t so fortunate. The really big money dried up before it cascaded down on him.

BWAF

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
11:13 pm

OK, Nire, and I said I’ll always WONDER……doesn’t exactly sound like I was trying to be factual now does it?

O'brien

May 28th, 2009
11:17 pm

I’ve really liked the way Mickael Pietrus has played. But it’s funny that they say he has played Lebron well. Despite the fact that Lebron is averaging over 40 points per game.

As for the Chills discussion, I dont want to have $9 mil tied up in a player that will not play for us. It’s bad enough we have Speedy making a little over $5 mil sitting on the bench, add that to Chills that makes $14 mil in deadweight.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
11:20 pm

Manny,

Read on: ;)
They didn’t raise their offer to Childress after Olympiakos emerged as a real player.

In other words, they had already made an offer – otherwise, there would have been nothing to “raise.” When Olympiacos came in and offered the equivalent of a $9M/yr contract, the Hawks went no further. That’s basically what I said I thought happened – Sund DID make an initial offer. He just decided to look elsewhere once Olympiacos offered way, way more than we were willing to pay.

Sautee,

Fair ’nuff. My bad!

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
11:22 pm

Nire and Manny,

doc refers to the cap hold as “play money” saying in effect that it doesn’t affect cash flow. How exactly does that work?

If O’Brien is right, then I’d have to agree.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
11:23 pm

Matt,

no prob, we’re cool.

Sautee

May 28th, 2009
11:26 pm

Enjoyed the banter. ‘night all

Melvin

May 28th, 2009
11:26 pm

Rafer Alston shot the Magic right out of the game in the 4th…

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
11:41 pm

Sautee,

Doc is right. O’Brien is a bit off-base. The “cap hold” simply means that for the purposes of determining how much we are under the cap during the free agency period, Josh counts for ~$9M. But that has no effect on cash flow – the money is not paid to anyone or anything. Basically, the cap hold is designed to stop a team that is technically “under the cap” but that has a bunch of its own free agents left to re-sign from going out and signing other teams’ free agents (since they’re “under the cap”) and THEN re-signing their own free agents (which they’re allowed to do even if it puts them over the cap).

So long story short – yeah, it’s play money. It doesn’t effect cash flow, and it disappears off our salary cap sheet if we renounce Childress.

niremetal

May 28th, 2009
11:42 pm

And I spent WAY too much time on this tonight. Ha!

MannyT

May 28th, 2009
11:51 pm

Sautee, are you and doc using off blog communications again :-)

Cap hold is not real cash, but it does determine how you can spend your cap money. The cap hold for Chills decreases the money the Hawks can spend by about $10 mil/season until his NBA status is resolved. I think that until he is officially back in the FIBA fold, the Hawks have that part of their cap money frozen.

This could be enough of a reason to tell Chills agents that you are willing to do a sign & trade. His cap hold craps up a chunk of Sund’s flexibility to remake the roster.

niremetal, I should not have said that no offer was made, but when I read Chills view in the Sports Business Daily article, he states that there was daily contact from his side and the Hawks were dragging their feet.

In the NY Times article, Chills says about the meeting with the Greeks in Las Vegas

“It’s a good feeling,” Childress said. “I felt wanted. I felt important.”

Bottom line for me was that making the guy feel good during negotiations makes it easier for you to close the deal prior to other entities coming into play. Once he had to sell himself to other NBA teams and got some nibbles, it was a messy situation because of RFA rules.

If another team wanted to pay him more than MLE, they could not w/o the Hawks permission. If such a situation is found, it makes sense that Chills believes he is worth that amount. Chills didn’t have the high profile visits that Smith did, but you got the impression that other teams had interest if there was sign and trade talk.

Gotta let the blog go for the night. If I need to do more on this I’ll see it in the morning.

BWAF

niremetal

May 29th, 2009
1:06 am

I don’t believe for a second that Chill would have stayed here for $6.5M or even $7M in the face of the Greek offer that paid him $3M-$4M more in take-home cash. If you really think he would, ok, and we can agree to disagree.

But the bottom line for me is this: There was no way we could keep Childress here at a price that made any financial sense. Given that, our best option was to let him go to Europe…at least last summer. This summer is trickier, since we surely will not tender him another qualifying offer next summer unless we extend both JJ and Marvin. Under those circumstances, this might be the last chance to get something for him.

But again, no one should fall into the trap of thinking that if we don’t re-sign Childress or trade him, that means the front office blew it. That’s the whole point of my whole dissertation on this. My guess is that no NBA team will make Childress an offer that we won’t be willing to match. I’m also assuming that Sund would not be so stupid as to ignore a sign-and-trade offer that would give us SOMEthing of net value. Assuming I’m right about those two things, then we might be right back where we were last summer. And if that’s the case, and if our only options are:

1) Overpay to get him (and I would consider anything much over $7M/yr overpaying)
2) Sign-and-trade him in a deal where we have to take back bad, non-expiring contracts; or
3) Let him go back to Europe…

Then I take option 3. Every time.

dap01

May 29th, 2009
8:22 am

Childress followed the money. Good for him. But he is not worth near that money in the NBA. Either he plays for us at a very reduced rate or we get something of value for his rights. Other than that, let’s go get a center and a PG (a coach would be nice also).

jhan

May 29th, 2009
9:34 am

If by renouncing the rights to Childress we free up enough cap space to get the players we need for this team then I don’t see any problem with that. Whats the difference between doing that or a S&T this offseason. Net is we get the player we need.

I don’t get caught up in the players “feelings” or did we show him enough respect. It’s the players job to milk as much money as possible from the team. The teams job is to sign the player for as little as possible. That scenario is set-up to create animosity.

Childress is not worth more than the MLE. Especially for the next few years as this economy suffers. There will be many players of equal or greater skill looking for work. Why pay more than needed?

How long will Childress be happy in Greece? Will he feel the pull to play against the best again? He may decide to be a middle of the road player in Europe that gets overpaid his entire career. Nothing wrong with that if the money is right.

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
9:46 am

If the consensus is that Childress is worth the MLE then how much is Marvin worth? Wasn’t it Childress that replace Marvin in the lineup to closeout games for the Hawks. Should we evaluate Childress contract base on him being bench player or his vital role to the team? How come it’s expected that the Hawks should offer Marvin more than his qualifying offer (of over 7 mil) when he played less of role to the team success than Childress????

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
9:56 am

This link is for you Sautee and MannyT

http://www.slate.com/id/2218849/?Gt1=38001

Stay thirsty my friends…

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
10:11 am

jhan, I agree. It seems like it is easier to renounce Chill and have the flexibility to go after any free agent on any team than to have to worry about negotiating a S & T with a team that is interested in Chill. Not to mention, that we can only negotiate a S & T if Chill opts out of his Greek contract. But we can drop the afro and just be done with the whole mess.

Melvin, I think Marvin’s development as an above average perimeter defender this past season would have likely kept Chill on the bench at the end of games. If Sund can get Joe to agree on an extension this summer, then I would cut Marvin loose. But if Joe doesn’t sign an extension, I would try to negotiate a long-term deal with Marvin. If we have to rebuild our backcourt in ‘10-11, then I’d rather do it around a Horford/Smith/Marvin front court.

I MUS.WRITE

May 29th, 2009
10:54 am

DAM it man….. Good post just got eaten…. Sekou did u zapp me for sayn NWA

Mike is back

May 29th, 2009
11:02 am

It seems either Thabeet or Stephan Curry may not last past the third pick…THERE IT IS…THE BIG AND PG/SG I WOULD PURSUE IN THE DRAFT.
http://www.drewsportswatch.com/ 

I love the kid Stephan Curry…he can light it up…but I’m still holding out hope that Acie will be given a shot…If I was going to take a PG in the Hawks position…I would wait to the second round…I think some these PGs being mentioned at the 19th pick…will fall to the second round. If that’s the case…why not stick with Acie. Excuse my shameless plug for CHARLESG…that’s my nephew. I told my sister I would shout him out to the BLOG CREW!!!! lolMannyT and Niremetal thanks for keen insight on the cap figures and under currents they pose for Sund during FA. I’m use to MannyT putting it down…with Nire in the mix…it makes things VERY interesting. Sund and ASG will have to remain vigilant throughout the process…too much is at stake. Having said that…I STILL SAY…PLAYERS MAKE PLAYS AND GM MAKE DEALS!!!!!!!! 

Even with all these ramifications…there will still be some mega deals made come July…I just hope we are in the mix for a change. I’m with NewK on this issue…IF AIN’T ABOUT THE LARRY O’BRIAN TROPHY…WHY BOTHER MEASURING SUCCESS!!!!!!  

Niremetal, if you couldn’t make a deal involving Josh…what would be your first big impact move for the Hawks? Excuse the context of my blog…I still get angina thinking about English in College…thank god I write software code for living…I would be out of work. Heh heh 

HUGE GAME BY LBJ…man I have been glued to the tube every nite sense the Conference Final started…the basketball gods are giving us a treat I’m on records as saying both series will go seven games…it might be six. Could it be LA and ORLANDO? 

LETS GO DHOWARD…I’M ROOTING FOR U FOLK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

doc

May 29th, 2009
11:05 am

melvin it almost wants to make me grow my hair back along with the beard again. wild thing with experience.

also know that the hawks have closed off try outs for in coming draftees, so what? we wont see them for a couple of years on the court anyway.

on the other hand the trauma would be great if jhan and i couldnt see the in coming talent for the 2009-2010 a town dancers. looks pretty tasty just from the pix they showed. keep it coming ajc.

sekou, were you the one behind the camera? if not, why not bro? you arent getting paid to sit and why miss such a display of pulchitrude or do you just like naked men? samuel talk to the cuz man, he might need someone to hold the lights.

Mike is back

May 29th, 2009
11:14 am

I MUS.WRITE, I feel you bro…my blog got jammed together. MannyT and Niremetal, I know it hard to read…I should stick to making my two…tree…comments. Heh heh

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
11:40 am

Doc, I can’t get enough of that guy and his commericals. After all, he is the most interesting man in the Universe… Now only if I can learn how to live vicariously thru myself….lol

Samuel

May 29th, 2009
12:09 pm

Joe and Jhan,

I agree on the Chills thing. There are plenty of Josh Childresses or better out there.

Doc,

Been trying to hook up with Cuz for three or four years at least. I’m very “cheap” during the summer months, too. I would love to do apprentice thing. I believe I could get better shots than those.

Cuz is probably hanging out with the “snow bunnys” up in Denver or at them awsome “Gentlemans Clubs” near LAX or somewhere. He’s too heavy for me.

Ken Strickland

May 29th, 2009
12:42 pm

BIG RAY-our bench situation is a combination of both. It’s been under and/or misused and it’s not very deep as it should be. However, we have to attribute some of that to a lack of time, attention and effort committed to development. We must also remember who made the final decision on which players get to sit on that bench. I’m also aware that the HC doesn’t always get to make that decision on every player, but he shouldn’t take it out on the play, since players don’t draft themselves. The intelligent thing to do is to try and get the most out of that player for the overall benefit of the team.

BIG RAY, it’s really frustrating for me to see the Hawks underachieve. The most frustrating thing is knowing the team doesn’t have to go outside for a bunch of new talent to reach the next level. Mentorship, a renewed committment of time, attention and development, and the ability to employ strategy, can be manifested internally.

We just can’t continue running off talented players like Chills, Acie, Salim, Solo etc, just because of the silly hangups and illadvised decisions being made by our GM and HC, not to mention ownership. I wonder what Sund used as a cryteria for having such a low assessment of Chills. He has a liftime shooting % of .522(FMurray .418-MEvans .448), REB’s 5.6(Murray 2.0-Evans 2.7), SCORING 11.1(Murray 9.9-Evans 7.0). Chills also led in career stats in almost every other category and he’s far more versatile than either. When Sund made the decision to give Woodson a 2yr extension, he should have made every effort to give him what he needed to be successful. That included bringing back Chills, a player Woodson obviously valued very highly. Having FMurray and Chills coming off the bench would have been excellent, and would have also made it a lot easier for Woodson. We know ownership gave him the ok to spend the money to resign Chills.

doc

May 29th, 2009
12:54 pm

samuel i know your elbows are sharper than mine so i will stay out of the way but if you need some cheap labor toting stuff when you catch up to cuz ket me know. i will eagerly blend into the background.

i know aj is in line too, dont let him fool you. he loves those children too.

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
12:57 pm

Dammit, Sekou, you need to suggest to the Hawks hierarchy that 1-2 of their most dedicated fans and bloggers should participate in the A-Town dancer judging. Come on man, membership needs to have some privileges. I promise, my stalking days are over. Just ask Ciara. I haven’t camped in front of her condo in at least the past 3 weeks.

cp

May 29th, 2009
1:01 pm

We sure could have used Chills in the playoffs.Since there are so many like him or better, I wonder why didn’t pick one up. We missed his rebounding and second chance points. He always seemed to come up with a key rebound when needed. He could also guard multiple positions. Had a great basketball IQ and was a good free throw shooter. I would love to have him back . I would take Chills over Mo every day of the week.

Sekou Smith

May 29th, 2009
1:16 pm

I was a judge for the A-Town Dancers a few years ago and was never invited back (go figure). Wish I was the dude taking the photos. :)

You’re my man niremetal, but one bit of the Childress issue might be getting lost in translation. The Hawks talked a salary range with Childress but never actually presented him with an offer until after the offer from Greece was on the table.

And the breakdown, as far as I can tell, came in the semantics and the actions that didn’t match up with the words. Childress kept hearing that he was a priority but never saw any action to back that up. He was told that the Hawks had to handle things with Josh Smith first and yet his deal with Olympiacos (Olympiakos, whatever) was done before Josh Smith’s offer came from Memphis.

I hope this is making sense. But the bottom line is these guys were being told they were priorities but the Hawks didn’t want to make a move until they were sure all the cap space everywhere else was already exhausted before they actually starting passing the paper back and forth across the table with actual figures on it.

That’s a good negotiating theory … until it blows up in your face.

And Lang was right, no one, Childress included, thought the Hawks were going to pay him what Olympiacos was willing to pay him. He just wanted his deal done. And it never got to that point (and keep in mind, there were two weeks to negotiate, starting July 1, before anything had to be signed. So I’m sure both Childress and to an extent Smith, expected the Hawks to be ready to do business on the 15th).

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
1:30 pm

Good points Sekou. I know I read that Chills wanted his deal done early and the Hawks dragged their feet. Again, Sund overplayed his hand.
The question now is, will the Hawks resign Chills, get something of value from a S&T or let Chills become an UFA?

Mike is back

May 29th, 2009
1:35 pm

Sekou, is there any realistic chances of Chill returning to the Hawks!! He’s one of missing elements in the switching defense Woody deploys. He was a good on ball defender with length and athleticism …plus, he used to troll the baseline on offense getting easy throw downs and he would crash the boards for rebounds.

I’m thinking that the Euro league has help enhance his offensive skills. That’s a scary thought considering the caliber of player he was. I just think he knows Woody system and Woody trusted him. That’s got to count for something.

Hoops

May 29th, 2009
2:01 pm

I like Childress just like most of you do, but I do not believe that he will come back to the hawks as long as Coach Woodson. If I am right, we need to move on. He will not be a Hawk!

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
2:11 pm

Darn the Childress issue, is this the last day of the A-Town Dancers competition and if not, you need to report on the date, time and location where interested parties can bring their telescopic photo lenses (oops), I mean where casual observers can cheer on the contestants.

MannyT

May 29th, 2009
2:12 pm

Melvin & doc,

I’m sure that you guys were in the final cut for Most Interesting Man in the World. Thanks for the link.

Sekou,

Thanks for adding some clarity to the Chills banter.

O’Brien,

Don’t think of the cap hold as lost money–it’s more like a hold on your credit card. If you had a crad with a $60 mil limit, there is a hold of about $10 mil for Chills, so you cannot spend that part of your credit limit until he is resolved every year. By the way, you carry about $40 mil on that card already for current charges i.e. player salaries.

Astro,

Looks like there are A town tryouts the same day as the next select a seat. Not saying you have to sign up for season tix, but this is an eye candy alert…and I know you like candy ;-)

niremetal,

In general I don’t disagree with you on how this gets resolved. You don’t overpay; you don’t do a bad sign & trade, but at some point if Chills returns to the NBA, the Hawks have to deal with the situation. Either they find an acceptable sign & trade or they give him the one year tender (which is well under his worth especially if it doesn’t have inflation escalators.) However, the cap hold during the intial part of free agency while Chills is in Europe will likely make the Hawks late to the party each year. In years that you are well over the cap, it does not matter. In a year like this one where you could be under the cap and add someone, it does matter.

Much of the conversation we had last summer was around the question of would the result of negotiations been different if they had been more amiable in early July.

Stay thirsty my friends…BWAF

Sekou Smith

May 29th, 2009
2:23 pm

I think there’s a very real chance the Childress situation could heat up again Mike. The question will be, just like it was last summer, how big a priority he becomes for the Hawks. If they feel like the he can help them improve and the price is right, they have to explore it.

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
2:32 pm

RealSquawk,

Here’s good assessment of Josh and why it may be in the best interest of the Hawks to keep him…

• F Josh Smith didn’t just outscore all the Hawks’ other starters (26-25) in their season-ending Game 4 loss to Cleveland in the Eastern Conference semifinals, he also led the Hawks in scoring (17.1), rebounds (7.5), blocks (1.5) and steals (1.1, he tied with Flip Murray) in 11 postseason games. He only shot 42 percent from the floor and a putrid 13 percent (2-for-15) from beyond the 3-point line. But he raised his dismal free-throw shooting percentage from the regular season up 72 percent during the playoffs.

Still, there are those who criticize Smith for not being able to knock down the open 16-footers both the Heat and Cavaliers dared him to take every game. If Smith wants to silence his critics, he’ll need to return with a much more sound outside game.

MannyT

May 29th, 2009
2:40 pm

Astro…whose your buddy?

This week was prep camp for the actual auditions. See audition link in bottom blue bar.

http://www.nba.com/media/hawks/ATown_Dancers_Site.html

Mike is back

May 29th, 2009
2:54 pm

Thanks Sekou…Chill was sorely missed during the playoff.

O'brien

May 29th, 2009
3:20 pm

Manny and all you money guys, thanks for clearing up Chills’ cap hold issue. To go back to the credit card analogy though, the bad thing is I might want to use that money to buy something else, but I can’t, so I have nothing to show for it.

Did you guys se Chad Ford’s report on how the first day of the NBA draft combine went?

Two points he mentioned:
1) Lawson was small in stature, and he had a so-so performance.
2) BJ Mullens: They were impressed by his workouts, and think he has a chance to move up.

doc

May 29th, 2009
3:30 pm

anybody need a wing man?

cp

May 29th, 2009
4:03 pm

O’brien I said in a earlier post I bet that Mullens moves up in the draft. He has the athleticism that gives gm’s hope. His game on the other hand is raw. He could be another Patrick O’Bryant. A guy that excels in these workouts because of their athleticism but have no real game. Only time will tell.

Sautee

May 29th, 2009
4:25 pm

Niremetal

Here we go again. You said this: “No NBA team in a position to sign him or trade useful assets for him was willing to pay him more than ~$6.5M.”

Got a source for that?

doc

May 29th, 2009
4:34 pm

anybody need a wing man?

manny t, it sounds like this to me. i have 60000 line of credit with american express but i only use about 3000 of it. i went to the porsche place and told the guy about it to maybe save me a cayman in silver. imagine this? he sold it when i didnt come back within the month and sign the dotted line with all my credit. sounds like he was a good business man and chills was one too. funny how so many held it against him.

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
4:49 pm

doc,

Had you bought the Porsche in a timely fashion (or at first opportunity), then it would have been you riding home on a new horse but b/c of your procastination, you had to settle for a Fiat. Instead of bragging about your 0-60, you want to discuss MPG’s…

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
4:55 pm

Thanks Manny. You may not be the most interesting man in the world, but you’re the most interesting man on Sekou’s blog. Hey, you have to start somewhere. My wife would likely tell you that I’m not even the most interesting man in my house, especially since my oldest looks like the contractor who worked on our deck a few years back.

newkid

May 29th, 2009
4:57 pm

Wilding. Not advocating this, but haven’t seen it mentioned. Thought I’d throw it on the table for reaction. JJ (~15M) and perhaps pieces for Caron Butler (~10M), Washington’s 5th (~3.5M), and pieces (McGee?). Wizards are reported to be interested in trading the pick for a vet who might help them get back into the playoffs with a chance to make some noise. Could make sense if Sund already knows JJ isn’t going to sign an extension (will he?). Negotiations would have to be completed prior to draft so that Wizards are selecting for us. Pieces would need to help Wizards get close to or below next year’s luxury tax without constraining Hawks in building core (minus JJ). Either keep the 5th and select the team’s future pg, or trade down with say the Knicks for their unconditional 1st in the 2010 draft. Knicks are almost a lock for the early lottery next year (can anyone say John Wall?). Go to the FA market in 2010 to get our star (you name him).

Thoughts?

Sautee

May 29th, 2009
5:23 pm

Newk,

I like it a LOT, IF McGee is included. Caron is a stud and could adequately replace Joe’s scoring and D. We’d need another shooter though, since Caron’s 3 pt. % is fairly low.

But could Butler play at the 2? Doesn’t he usually play the 3?

And if not, who plays SG?

And would they need JJ to sign an extension first, else it could be a one year rental?

One of the more realistic trade suggestions I’ve seen here. We’d likely have to throw in #19, but it’s a nice idea.

Sautee

May 29th, 2009
5:27 pm

doc

The most interesting man in the world MAY need a wing man, but you’ll have to get a fez! ;-)

newkid

May 29th, 2009
5:41 pm

Sautee, you’re right about Butler playing the 3 in DC, but his frame and mobility are similar to JJ’s. I would try to play him at the 2, but would seek a ‘proven’ fallback via ‘09 FA or via trade.

Polin is getting older (much) and really wants to compete for the O’Brien trophy before that awful clock runs out (it’s relentlessly chasing us all isn’t it?). He may not require JJ to sign an extension (prior to trading for him) if he can be persuaded that a one-year rental (at minimum) of JJ, combined with his current array, will get him a real shot at the 2nd or 3rd round in 2010 (in fact, Polin may not even wish to extend JJ under current market conditions and with the bloated payroll he has already). Orlando tells us anything can happen if you can get to the 2nd round.

doc

May 29th, 2009
5:46 pm

melvin all you can do is bring what ya got.

Melvin

May 29th, 2009
6:13 pm

Doc,
That’s too bad. Especially when your significant other authorize you to buy the Porsche in the first place…

tyger

May 29th, 2009
6:17 pm

Economics of Player Development

One of the realities of blowing a team up and rebuilding through the draft is that those young players eventually will have to be re-signed or not. The Clippers have been the longest running joke in the NBA for constantly drafting top 10 and letting those players walk. (see Tom Chambers, Lamar Odom, Terry Cummings, Danny Manning, Elden Brand, Gary Payton). But the reality is, you cant keep’em all but you cant let’em all go either. The risk is they blossom elsewhere – you drafted them but were penny-wise and dollar foolish.

We’ve lost both Chills and Shellhead from recent past drafts. Neither will/would voluntarily take less money for their work AND neither would you. So, don’t expect anything different from Marvin or anyone else. The recession may help the Hawks some, but not much, if they lose #2 Marvin, who they chose over Chris Paul, they will be lampooned.

Side note: Both Childress and Shelden have gotten a dose of reality in the process too: just b/c you are a top ten lottery pick doesn’t guarantee a starting position or big salary. I always felt that BKs rebuild generated a false sense of accomplishment on behalf of those rookies. Chills and Jsmoove started since Day 1 – winning just 13 games, yet they felt entitled to a starting position no matter what – not appreciating or accepting that teams evolve every year. So they back themselves into a corner and ruin a potentially better long term situation in exchange for greater short term monetary gain. Marvin needs to monitor this closely, its not college where coming off the bench and winning a championship at UNC is noble but in the pro’s – you could take less money and they still trade your ass. Now, your stuck like Chuck.

But while most of the focus has been on Chills, I wouldn’t mind bringing Shelden Williams back, now that his role has been more clearly defined – in his mind. He knows now, he is not a starter and wont get a big payday. A roster spot should be his goal or maybe Europe is in his future too. Don’t think his game translates well there, but here, we need another big, strong, bulky bruiser that’s fundamentally sound. Shelden knows how to play – problem is he thought he was a SF.

In sum, in order to properly evaluate these young players before they become UFA/RFA; they have to play. The last thing you want to see is Marvin in another uniform putting up 30 a night. He has that kind of talent and game – still needs alot of work, but with his improved 3pt. shooting and willingness to drive and camp at the FT line – he could do it with improved ballhandling, agility and footwork.

AC Law is the prime example – I bet AC Law has a long 10 yr NBA career, but it won’t be in ATL. He hasn’t been an instant hit, but by rule, you only get 3 yrs. to make your mind up about these guys, so you have to play them. Now, we’re in the PG market again, despite having a #11 pick with 3 yrs, experience, who was probably the best overall PG that year. Yet, he’s still not ready to play, now we have to add more payroll b/c we didn’t get a good return on 3yr. investment. Another team will get the benefit our lotto pick, our time, money, energy and reap the benefits of a very good young PG, while we sign more likely than not, a veteran with warts on the downside of their career.

angry banker

May 29th, 2009
6:30 pm

PICK UP TONY DOUGLAS WITH THE 19TH!!

Jody

May 29th, 2009
6:49 pm

How about Patrick Mills with the 19th pick?

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
7:41 pm

claude

May 29th, 2009
7:50 pm

Woody’s a friggin train wreck. As long as he is here, there is no point in drafting a point guard. woody has Pat Riley disease…he’s allergic to youth…it gives him hives. Too bad he doesn’t coach like Pat. He is partially to blame for the lack of real growth in many of the hawks skills. What plays is he running for them? He’s basically doing the same foolishness the cavs are doing w/ lebron. Unfortunately, jj isn’t lebron. Now i understand trying to keep your job, but something’s got to give. Draft someone who(like Horford) has no choice but to get playing time, because we are so weak for what he’ll offer. That’s why i hope either bj mullens or jrue holiday are there. He’ll need the scoring that either can provide.(Especially given woody’s inability to draw up an effective offensive possession…how many times have the hawks come out of a timeout needing a basket & got nothing.) Mullens isn’t polished, but right now is as good or better than most of what we’ve got inside…and there’s a player in him somewhere. Jrue Holiday reminds me of what Dwade was coming out of college, although, he’s a bit less athletic. Quick 1st step, good shooter, can create his own shot, good distributor. He may take over if joe bounces next year. I don’t mind resigning bibby at a discount in the immediate, but he has his liabilities. He’s small, not a good defender, doesn’t really create or distribute at a high level. I mean he averaged 2 assists less than horford did last year. Resigning flip & starting him next year as we develop someone seems fine w/ me. Maybe that someone is acie, maybe a rookie. But i’d definately focus on youth rather than age/experience. face it the next couple of years in our division will belong to the magic. We’re not gonna spend a ton of money, so develop the young guys. It’s the best shot at taking a great leap forward. Run plays for Jsmoove or Marvin, help our pf’s w/ their post up work(mark price did wonders last year, how about a big to help teach the bigs)…FREE ACIE or perhaps free Acie.

MannyT

May 29th, 2009
7:53 pm

tyger…interesting thoughts. Do you think Shelden would come back and play for Woody? If he’s looking at low paying options, I think he would prefer to be on the west coast with the wife & new baby.

All that draft camp chatter looks more like we get a PG…hopefully a bigger one (6′ 2″ ish) or the fastest guy that can actaully play at this level (like Mills) if shorter. Not that many bigs available and if BJ Mullens is doing well, he may not last until the 19th pick.

Seems that the new format of the draft camp takes away from seeing guys compete against each other. When you pick as low as we do, I hope there is more of a chance to get guys to come in and mix it up in workouts.

Astro…thanks for the lesson on why one should not buy a fixer upper if the Mrs is in that child bearing zone 8-O

doc…Hooters is full of wing men. They say–the more, the merrier.
As for that Porsche, the messy thing is that it was a lease. Sund has to wait for it possibly as long as 3 years, and it keeps popping up on his AmEx as a hold charge.

No hate for Chills, but this could get real messy if he wants to return to the NBA. Just take those David Andersen articles about the financial problems with coming here and replace the name.

Stay thirsty…for hoops…my friends…BWAF

Sautee

May 29th, 2009
7:58 pm

AJ,

Thanks, good link.

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
8:17 pm

Sautee, no problem. Manny, I agree that Shelden would most likely be looking for a nice quiet spot on a west coast bench.

Blast

May 29th, 2009
8:20 pm

I see Josh Childress is still dominating the blog, and here are my takes on it.

How is a sign and trade going to work without Childress permission? Meaning he renounces his Greek rights and returns to the NBA? The NBA cannot sign and trade with Euro League, correct? I really don’t see Josh doing that because no way would he make anywhere close to that Greek contract in the NBA. No young man in his right mind will give up all those millions and return to this sad American economy. That’s just the way it is. Money rules. That’s why or the main reason he fled for Europe in this first place, innit? If I were him, I would finish my contract over there, make my money, then return to the NBA if I so choose, hopefully with a more polished offensive game.

So Hawks only have this year to do something with those ‘rights’. Don’t those rights expire after this season? Niremetal, need your help here.

niremetal

May 29th, 2009
8:27 pm

No, the rights have no expiration date (according to cap guru Larry Coon). We can tender every summer and keep him a restricted free agent. However, we almost certainly will not tender every summer because that straps us too much in terms of cap space. This year, the cap hold for Childress is no-harm, no-foul because we’re over the cap anyway. Next summer will be different if we don’t extend JJ (and something tells me we won’t), since in that case, we’d want to have all the cap room we can get.

Blast

May 29th, 2009
9:23 pm

LA/Denver. What we got here tonight? A low scoring game? No team has scored 10 points yet in the 1st!

O'brien

May 29th, 2009
9:25 pm

JJ has one year left on his conract right? Do the Hawks offer him an extension now, or are they going to wait until the end of the season? Personally, I would like to give him an extension now. However, I dont think he deserves a big pay raise, especially in this economy. He made $14 mil this year, but at 27 years old, I would offer him no more than 5 years, $80 mil. What do you guys think?

Blast

May 29th, 2009
9:29 pm

Niremetal,

Appreciate, but are we really over the cap? I thought last season Hawks was one of few teams under the cap. Next season, some project the cap to be at about 70 mil. I know Hawks payroll ain’t nowhere close to that. Not last season and not this coming one with all the free agent they have.

Ken Strickland

May 29th, 2009
10:38 pm

Aside from Chills’ excellent all around basketball skills, I’d like to see us persue him because there’s no doubt he’d have Woodson’s approval. His excellent ballhandling, passing and penetrating skills would also lessen the effects of our PG issues.

Since Woodson is going to be our HC next yr, we should do everything we can to help him be successful by trying to get him whatever players he needs and will accept. At this point, drafting a player that’s not another AHorford type would be a wasted pick, especially if Woodson is kept beyond next season.

MannyT

May 29th, 2009
10:48 pm

Blast…that 70 mil must be an estimate of the luxury tax level. The cap will likely be close to or a bit below this year’s number, which was around 58 mil. The Hawks will be around 41 mil, but the cap hold charges for all of those free agents will put us over (until they are signed by another team.) If most of them re-up here, we will still be over the cap.

So all you free agent shoppers need to think MLE salary MINUS Flip’s money, because he has not been here long enough to get Bird rights.

Looks like no altitude factor in the NBA Finals unless Denver pulls it together soon.

BWAF

HawkKingBibby

May 29th, 2009
11:16 pm

SEKOU, I just had a crazy idea that the Hawks would PROLLY never explore. What do you think the HAWKS would have to give GS to exchange pick #19 for pick #7? Would some combo of pick #19, Acie, Chills or David Andersons rights get us to #7? I think at first (worse case scenario) Curry could fill Flips role if we keep Bibby and ( best case scenario) he explodes after a couple months and becomes our starting point.

niremetal

May 29th, 2009
11:26 pm

Blast,

Our cap holds for Marvin, Bibby, and our first round draft pick place us over the salary cap for the purposes of determining whether we’re allowed to sign other teams’ free agents. That means that until we re-sign or renounce both Marvin and Bibby, we are “over the cap” as far as the NBA is concerned.

And you’re going on old, old data if you think we’ve been under the cap. We haven’t been under the cap for two years. Bibby’s contract (and before that, the contracts of Lue/AJ/Wright) placed us over the cap. Our payroll this year was in line with the rest of the league – it was $68M, and 16 of the league’s 30 teams had payrolls between $67M and $73M. The only team under the cap this past year was Memphis.

Blast

May 29th, 2009
11:27 pm

So, LA is going to the finals. Denver shoot themselves in this one. They could have won this series easy. Let’s hope the Magic can hold swerve vs leBron and co.

niremetal

May 29th, 2009
11:29 pm

Oh, and the salary cap isn’t close to $70M. It was $58M this past year, and is likely to go DOWN this coming year thanks to the recessions (which have cut into league revenues). Whoever these “some” are that said that the cap will be at or near $70M is either confusing the salary cap with the luxury tax threshold or just doesn’t know what they’re talking about.

Blast

May 29th, 2009
11:43 pm

Niremetal,

Appreciate. That’s why I called on you, brother! So Hawks have some major off season moves to make!

Najeh Davenpoop

May 29th, 2009
11:54 pm

Just saw that Eddie Jordan got hired by the Sixers. If you thought that athletic team caused matchup problems this year, wait until Jordan institutes the offense he ran in New Jersey with Jason Kidd (who, by the way, is a free agent). More than any other team below them, I could easily see the Sixers making a move past the Hawks next year if the Hawks don’t make significant improvements.

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
12:11 am

Nire,

After evaluating the Hawks cap situation, that’s why I said a few weeks back that I would give Sund a good grade if he could resign our top 4 FA’s, JChills and D.Andersen…

KevinA

May 30th, 2009
12:41 am

Childress scores 23 extending the series. They are down 1-3 in a race to 5. Childress also scored 23 in the first game. I would really like to see this guy come back. I know Flip and Evans played good but Chills is a better defender and tough player.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
1:08 am

Melvin,

Agreed. I honestly think we should bring back Chill if it will cost us “only” $7M or so. Same with Andersen if we could lure him here for $4M or less. The problem is that those deals would put us at or over the luxury tax threshold, and I would be surprised if ASG was willing to do that. My guess is that Bibby will stay for a contract that pays him “only” $6.5M or so per year. That $8.5M “savings” over Bibby’s old salary will need to be divvied up between Marvin, Flip, Zaza, Childress, Andersen, and/or any other teams’ free agents. I’d prefer re-signing Flip and Zaza for a modest raise over signing Andersen (though Andersen is significantly better offensively, Zaza is a better defender and rebounder by all accounts, and I think we need that more).

Anyway, we’ll see…

Najeh Davenpoop

May 30th, 2009
1:15 am

Slam magazine has a brief list of pre-draft measurements posted. Most of these players will be gone by the time the Hawks pick, but I’ll say it one more time — if DeJuan Blair is available where the Hawks pick, they would be insane to pass him up. A 7′2″ wingspan more than makes up for being a few inches too short.

KevinA

May 30th, 2009
1:47 am

Would love to keep Bibby but Marvin, Chills ZaZa, Solo, Flip and all the rest need to be resigned. Drop Mario if Chills is available. Chills is just better than most of this blog remembers. Would Chills and Marvin be willing to settle for 4 year deals of 30 million?

Bibby’s money funds the deals. Again I hope there is enough left for Bibby to stay and make everybody happy. I would ask Bibby to do a one year deal. If we lose Bibby all is not lost, we have Acie, Flip and Chills, all with PG experience. Not to mention JJ in a pinch.

We will not win a championship with this team but we would be a better team.

The year after is the big change year. I think we will lose JJ because of salary. We may lose Woody. I still like our core assuming we have Marvin, Chills, Josh, Al, ZaZA, Solo, Flip, Evans, Acie, Gardner, and Hunter.

Of course this line up may change if someone has a bad year while getting the chance to play. Evans, Bibby and Flip only players with any age issues.

I hope Sund and management make Woody commit to deciding the future of players like Solo, Acie, Gardner and Hunter. Next year should still be a building year. Let our young players get a chance to play and grow.

JJ, Bibby and Woody need to agree to involve the front court first or at minimum early shot clock ball rotation, pick and roll with Josh and Al attacking the basket as the preferred offensive push. JJ, Marvin, and Chills making attacking the basket a priority as well.

Bottom line we cannot move to the next level shooting jump shots. The team as a whole has to shoot a higher shooting percentage.

I don’t know how much you remember Chills playing pg at the end of games. Our switching defense was pretty tough. Letting Flip play a few of JJ minutes would keep him fresh.

I would like us to trade our draft pick for a future pick. We have plenty of young players to decide on now. If all this dream stuff actually happened we will have Bibby and JJ to decide on after next year. Maybe we will surprise and improve another 10 games. If not We have JJ and Bibby contracts due. Plenty of room for change.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
1:52 am

Najeh,

Shelden had the same build – 6′8, but with a 7′4 wingspan. Wingspan don’t mean a thing if you’re unathletic, have no offensive game, and have to rely on brute strength and hustle to get everything. That applies to Blair as much or more than it applied to Shelden, which is why he’s looking like a mid-to-late first round pick in a relatively weak draft.

Najeh Davenpoop

May 30th, 2009
2:40 am

You say Shelden Williams, I say Paul Millsap…

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
3:26 am

Paul Millsap came to the league with a stronger post repertoire than Shelden and certainly than Blair. He also is way, WAY more athletic than Blair. Go back and read all the scouting reports about Millsap from 2006, and pretty much all of them discuss how he had sneaky athleticism considering his strong, wide frame.

In any case, I’ll shoot someone if we pick an undersized power forward – which is our position of LEAST need going into this draft.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
3:29 am

Oh, and did I mention that Paul Millsap plays for JERRY SLOAN, whose system is a wet dream for power forwards? Do you think that Millsap would have been half as productive under Woody? If so, I’ve got a bridge to sell you…

Ed

May 30th, 2009
3:48 am

Astro Joe

May 29th, 2009
7:41 pm
Terrific link you posted Astro. The Hawks will have no shot at Jrue H. or BJ Mullens.

J-Chill was the glue of the Hawks last year. He held things together doing all the things coaches love but never show up when contract negotiations come up. He always finished games and his leadership / skills were not replaced by Mo & Flip. His absence was sorely missed.

Najeh Davenpoop

May 30th, 2009
3:50 am

“Do you think that Millsap would have been half as productive under Woody?”

Pretty much every player drafted from 2006 onward would be less productive under Woody, so that’s pretty irrelevant. This applies even more to front court players, who don’t get any plays run for them in Woody’s system.

When you’re picking late in a weak draft, you’re a lot better off drafting the best player available so you know you’re adding quality depth somewhere, as opposed to reaching for a so-called “need” pick and ending up paying guaranteed money to a scrub. I’m not suggesting by any means that Blair is going to be a perennial All-Star. But I’d definitely rather have a guy like him, who will have one NBA-caliber skill (rebounding) from day one, than someone like BJ Mullens for example who isn’t really good at anything yet and may never be, or a guy like Jeff Teague who hasn’t proven anything over a guy (Acie) we already have on the roster. Blair in my opinion will be a valuable role player from day one — and the best part about someone like him who exists solely to crash the boards and play physically is that no system can really restrict what he does, since he doesn’t need the ball in his hands to succeed.

As far as the Shelden comparisons, not only was Shelden unathletic in college, but he was also rigid and robotic in the post. Blair may not be a spectacular athlete (although I think he’s a better athlete than you do) but he’s a hell of a lot more fluid than Shelden.

Coincidentally, NBADraft.net (not an authoritative source or anything but still somewhat reliable) said about Millsap in ‘06: “Likely to struggle to get the same inside shots and rebounds against bigger and more athletic players on the next level”… more or less the same thing you’re saying about Blair.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
4:05 am

I can’t believe you just put “fluid” and “Blair” in the same sentence. Wow…

Way to selectively quote Millsap’s DraftExpress profile. See, I can do it too:
Offensively, Millsap is able to do a lot of damage at the mid-major level thanks to his bulk, athleticism, tenacious attitude and the way he runs the floor.

He is athletic, but not an explosive freak…

In any case, I have no problem taking Blair with our second round pick, which is where Millsap was taken. But he won’t get any PT on the Hawks with our bevy of forwards, and I doubt he’ll end up being much of anything in the NBA. As I said, why on earth would we pick a guy who’ll NEVER get more than 7 minutes a game as long as we have Josh and Al, and he does nothing to solve our REAL problem in the frontcourt – the fact that we don’t have a single pure center.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
4:07 am

And from his NBADraft.net profile, which is what you actually used:
Long arms and good strength and leaping ability allow him to play bigger than his actual size … great reflexes … Has good agility, runs the floor well. Solid in transition … Explosive leaper …

Ca$h

May 30th, 2009
5:07 am

Joe the Joke!! Unforced turnover committing, baby-bottom soft paint attempt shooting, 1 foot jumping, injury complex from Phoenix having, contact shying, overpaid, non-shot contesting, traveling, no-show in the playoffs performing, contested shot settling, shot-clock wasting, weak dribbling, often stripped and blocked handling, 2 free-throws the whole game shooting, zipped-lipped, emotionless, last man back in transition running, non fast break finishing, once every two months dunking, defeatist attitude having, excuse making, useless baseline game having, waste of a 6′7 240 lb frame. Offense or no offense, these are shortcomings that I can’t bear to watch from a supposed “number 1″ option any more. He barley puts up 20.0ppg in season and in the playoff thanks to Josh we beat Mami Heat… he over paid for his talent and age he not going to get much better due to his age. O yea again he over paid… TRADE him why we still can. I think we could get something good 4 him…lol

Ken Strickland

May 30th, 2009
7:18 am

CA$H-if JJ is all of the negatives you’re promoting why would someone give up something good for him? NBA executives don’t make a habit of giving up something good for players that fit your description of JJ. Besides, he can’t be as bad as you’re claiming. After all, that’s a lot of negativity for the players and coaches that voted him to 2 consecutive Allstar gms to ignore. If that’s your assessment of a 2 time Allstar, then the SOMETHING GOOD you mentioned getting in return for him would have to be an Allpro.

tony

May 30th, 2009
8:14 am

Who we should take in this year’s draft is a no-brainer. We must draft Tyler Hansbrough if he falls to us and here’s why.

#1)NC Tarheels produces the most NBA championship players: Billy Cunningham, James Worthy, Michael Jordan, Rick Fox, Rasheed Wallace, Kenny Smith, Bob McAdoo. That’s not counting the Tarheel players who are currently having an impact in the NBA:Vance Carter and Antawn Jamison. I didn’t include Marvin William because he was not a Tarheel starter nor was he a impact player for the Tarheels. We should have never drafted him.

#2) Tyler Hansbrough is the Tarheels All-Time Leading Scorer and here’s why he is their leading scorer: He loves to draw contact because he knows he can score from the foul line where he’s shooting 84% and he can knock down those mid-range shots.

#3) He’s a winner.

#4) He hustles on every play.

#5) He plays smart.(Something this team don’t do)

We should take Garret Siler in the 2nd round. He’s 7′0 305lbs. Trust me, he’s the sleeper in this draft. This kid is shooting 88.5%FG. He average 14 points a game. He is a solid shot blocker and rebounder.

tony

May 30th, 2009
8:33 am

Correction. Garret Siler average 16.2 points a game, ,789% FG, .655% FT, 8 RPG, 3 Blk a game.

Sautee

May 30th, 2009
9:37 am

Niremetal,

You must have missed this, so I’ll repost:

When we were discussing Childress you said this: “No NBA team in a position to sign him or trade useful assets for him was willing to pay him more than ~$6.5M.”

What was your source? I’ve never seen that anywhere. I could easily BELIEVE it, but I’ve never seen it.

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
9:38 am

Nire,

Let’s say we sign their top 4 FA’s, Chills and Andersen which put the Hawks over the luxury tax. Would they be require to pay the tax if they have an expiring contract (Speedy) that would lower their payroll under the luxury tax before July 1? I thought you can enter a season over the cap but you wouldn’t have to pay the tax if your payroll is under the cap by the deadline (July 1). So in my example above, if the Hawks don’t resign Speedy then they wouldn’t be require to pay the tax. Please advised.

RealSquawk

May 30th, 2009
9:44 am

Tony,

You might be right about us needing the help with Tyler especially since he measured in at 6′9″ with shoes and with his arms up is taller than blake griffin.

However if we don’t get somebody bigger than him. Then we probably don’t get any better.

I MUS.WRITE

May 30th, 2009
10:04 am

Newkid, Sign me up- That would be a great deal for us. Caron Butler,Mcgee,#5 for JJ -who might bolt next year any way……. Caron and JJ both average 20 points a game. Its really a trade off becuz jj plays better D but butler is quicker and gets to the rim alot more.

In the process we get a yung athletic center and pick up stephen curry at #5….. Curry, Butler,Mcgee> JJ

If we were to resign Flip, ZAZA, Chills and maybe pick up a Carl Landry who i like alot we would have some serious depth.

PG- Flip/Curry/AC
SG- Butler/Chillz
SF- Marvin/Chillz
PF- Josh/Landry
C- Horford/Mcgee/ZAZA

_Mario,Hunter, 2nd round pick

Ken Strickland

May 30th, 2009
10:37 am

I MUS.WRITE-I like that idea as well. Even though CButler’s DEF isn’t on par with JJ’s, having a PG next to him that doesn’t think he’s a matador would more than make up the difference. And more importantly, all of the players would likely be accepted by Woodson.

We have to do something to retain our key players. If we can’t spend the big bucks to keep them, we have to create an atmosphere within the organization and around the team that would make them consider taking less to stay. It’s certainly not the city that’s turning them off.

ILL-logical

May 30th, 2009
10:42 am

Trevor Ariza emerged as a star in the Western Conference finals and there are at least 2 outcomesfrom his emergence that have an effect on the Hawks.
First, he will most likely force the Lakers to part with Lamar Odum who could return to Miami. Reuniting with D-Wade will make Lamar happy and the Heat much ,much better.

On a more positive note, he demonstrated what some seem to forget: a player can greatly improve their shooting skills with hard work and support form the organization. before this year, Trevor was shooting 21% from the 3 point line according to the commentators last night.He had shot a total of about 20 in his prior 3 years in the league but shot 200 3’s this year.As of last night’s game , he was shooting 47% from the 3 point line for the play offs.

Now he may never be confused with Ray Allen but his improvement certainly helped the Lakers beat Denver’s double teams and ultimately win the series.

Another observation regarding the Western Conference finals is that while Carmello Anthony certainly displayed a wide array of talents during the serise, including some decent defensive play occasionally, he has yet demonstated the capacity or desire to make his team mates better. Something that seperates him from Kobe or LaBron. When the Hawks get such a player or one of the current group develops that skill, watch out!

tony

May 30th, 2009
10:43 am

RealSquawk, I understand your concern, but there isn’t a center in my opinion who we can draft in the 1st round who will have an immediate impact for us. There are many reason why we should draft Tyler Hansbrough. Another reason is that Marvin William is not a NBA starter. As a matter of fact, this team played better without Marvin in the lineup. Don’t be supprise if Tyler become the rookie of the year. I sure hope we draft him in he fall to 19.

I believe Garret Siler will develop into a nice center for us. I just hope we don’t pass up on him like we passed up on Andrew Bynum. Garret Siler could be the best center in this draft.

Between Tyler and Jrue Holiday(pg) are the 2 players who could help this team rite away. Both are smart discipline players who will listen to Mike Woodson.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
10:43 am

Niremetal,

“Source That?” Gee, I wonder what the next move is. How about “discredit the source.” Come on man, what’s with the junior league court tactics? I know, to make the tennis match even more fun, you can provide sources that others can then immediately discredit. Now we have a complete court room. Oops, forgot the judge and jury. Hmmmmm. Guess we don’t have those on a blog…..dammit man! ;)

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
11:02 am

Dajuan Blair is no offensive dynamo, but that’s not what you pick him up for. He’s a rebounder and defender who will turn into an opportunistic scorer, if he’s not one already.

I don’t see how he’s anything like Sheldon Williams. Sheldon had no heart. Blair does. Sheldon had some of the worst footwork on either end of the court that I’ve ever seen from a guy his size. I have no idea how you can be that big and constantly give up position on defense, and on the boards.

Blair does not seem to have that problem. He goes after rebounds. Sheldon did not. Am I saying we should draft Blair in the first round? Am I saying we should draft him at all? No. I’m saying I think Blair is a different guy altogether. And when you have a bevy of forwards, in which only three of them actually play (and that’s if you’re counting Horford), where’s all the lost PT?

I see the same problem for BJ Mullens. Sure he’s a 7-footer, but there are lots of those in the league, at the end of the bench. Where does he get his PT if we re-sign Zaza and keep Horford at starting center?

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
11:12 am

The big guy looks light on his feet to me. Reminds me of a shorter verison of Big Babe without the jumper. However, Big Babe developed his jumper after he got to Boston…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxxqEKssvgI&feature=PlayList&p=E0DBF87AC7753C9D&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=30

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
11:34 am

Melvin,

Good comparison.

Tony,

I like Tyler Hansbrough. He’ll play well off of somebody’s bench. He’s definitely a smart guy who not only knows his limitations, but knows how to exploit what he does have. I don’t know figure him to be a starter anywhere, and probably not a good pick for us in the first round. Ah well. You can’t get ‘em all.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
11:38 am

Niremetal,

“Oh, and did I mention that Paul Millsap plays for JERRY SLOAN, whose system is a wet dream for power forwards? Do you think that Millsap would have been half as productive under Woody? If so, I’ve got a bridge to sell you…”

By that logic, name a draft pick that DOESN’T fall into this category. Oh yes. BJ Mullens, as well, buddy.

Heehaw

May 30th, 2009
11:40 am

Niremetal,

You must have missed this, so I’ll repost:

When we were discussing Childress you said this: “No NBA team in a position to sign him or trade useful assets for him was willing to pay him more than ~$6.5M.”

What was your source? I’ve never seen that anywhere. I could easily BELIEVE it, but I’ve never seen it.

Najeh Davenpoop

May 30th, 2009
11:49 am

“he does nothing to solve our REAL problem in the frontcourt – the fact that we don’t have a single pure center.”

Off the top of my head, I can name exactly one quality starting center in the NBA right now who was drafted at #19 or later from the NCAA or high school — Kendrick Perkins. If you want to stretch the definition of “quality”, you can also include Brendan Haywood and Sam Dalembert. Keep in mind that NONE of these players came in the league and made an immediate impact. The only other quality starting center drafted that late is Ilgauskas, who would have gone much higher if he had been picked in 1998 and come to the NBA immediately instead of being picked in 1996 and stashed overseas.

The point is, your chances of finding a true quality center at #19 are pretty slim in general, and in a weak draft they’re almost nonexistent. If you think BJ Mullens is going to be the answer to that problem either this year or next, I have a bridge somewhere to sell you. If you’re not referring to Mullens as the solution to the “true center” problem at #19, I wonder who you are advocating with that pick, because the next center on NBADraft.net’s mock draft goes at #53. And knowing Woody’s impeccable player-development skills, what exactly makes you think a project like Mullens will EVER be successful here? At least Blair can come in and contribute immediately at SOMETHING (an area of need, in fact, since the Hawks’ only physical presence and rebounder off the bench right now is Zaza, a free agent). I don’t see where Mullens is going to give us anything more than Solomon Jones for at least his first season or two.

Moreover, I think (or at least I hope) Rick Sund of all people realizes how much trouble you can get into when you overvalue height — see Swift, Robert or Sene, Saer. Quite honestly I hope someone with your mindset reaches for Mullens higher than #19, so that Sund is not tempted to take him.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
11:55 am

One player who really doesn’t seem to have very much positive buzz these days is Ty Lawson. “Injury prone” one assistant GM calls him. “A backup point guard…he’s 100% behind Jonny Flynn” another NBA representative says. “He’s a product of North Carolina’s system” a third told us. Lawson seems to be outside of the lottery at the moment, but still has a good chance to be picked by two teams looking for point guards in the late teens, Philadelphia (#17) and Atlanta (#19). He’ll have to keep Eric Maynor at bay, though.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
12:02 pm

OOps. Forgot to post my “source.” DraftExpress.com.

Interesting. They have Dajuan Blair going #11, well before we pick. And here I was thinking this guy was no good. Of course, these are the same guys that had Marvin Williams at #2. Heh….

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
12:04 pm

Well said, Najeh.

cp

May 30th, 2009
12:05 pm

Tyler Hansbrough is a nice player but how is he better than Marin Williams? In all honestly it was because of Ty Lawson that North Carolina was so good. When Tyler had to defend the more athletic fowards he was torched. He will be a nice player but I would pass on him if I were the Hawks. I dont think Blair falls to 19 but I cant lie his height is a concern . He is a lot shorter than I thougth he would be. I think he measured out to be like 6′6. Im sorry but I just dont see him being as effective as he was in college. He might end up being another Ike Diago…. Its a few players im looking at for our pick. Terrance Williams, Sam Young, and Austin Daye.

Astro Joe

May 30th, 2009
12:05 pm

Well, I’ve been on the Blair band wagon for a while. And it is all relative. I wouldn’t suggest him if we had a top 10 pick, but we don’t. Getting a rebounding machine who can increase offensive possessions makes all the sense to me. Sure, a true center would be great. In the absence of that, find someone who brings some of the qualities of a true center. Like being a reounding fiend and being able to uproot guys out of their comfort zone in the low post. Oh and if he has a nasty temperment, all the better. Because our team is full of finesse players (including our front court). We could use a Danny Fortson type brute on this sqaud.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
12:05 pm

As it is, both Mullens and Blair are as likely to go higher than #19 as not. So we may get to argue about something else entirely. I’m in favor of a guard at this point….

;)

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
12:11 pm

Melvin,

Here’s what Coon says on the tax calculation date:

When determining the amount of tax a team owes, the league uses its team salary (see question number 14) on the date of their last regular season game (i.e., if a player is traded away before the end of the season, then none of his salary is taxed), with the following adjustments:

I’ll spare you the list, but none of the adjustments include letting a free agent go at the end of the year.

Najeh,

I wasn’t advocating taking Mullens. I was thinking more about taking a point guard or a legit 2-guard to back up JJ (i.e. not a combo guard like Flip). I used to think about Mullens, but it’s pretty clear at this point that he’s going higher than 19. In any case, the point was that there was no chance Blair would be anything more than a little-used player here in Atlanta as long as we have both Smoove and Horford. I will say that at least with Mullens, there’s a chance he’d be starter for us 2-3 years from now. There’s no such chance with Blair unless we reconstruct the team.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
12:13 pm

CP,

I see Hansbrough as a totally different player than Marvin. Marvin is more finesse, Hansbrough is better built for the back-to-the-basket power game (and he’s still not the NBA prototype for THAT). Marvin=starter. Hansbrough=NOT. He’d be good to bring off the bench. But then, I also think Othello Hunter has some good potential.

Astro Joe,

I initially wasn’t too hip to the idea of getting Blair. Let’s just cut to the chase and say that I was all kinds of wrong about that. This guy really gets after it, and I had to re-watch some footage of him, just to see it. Sheldon Williams this ain’t. One thing a rookie needs to have with a coach like Woody (or many other NBA coaches): self-made confidence. Sheldon didn’t have that. Blair has it in spades. I read some of the interviews he had. I like this kid.

I imagine we will not go for a guard in the first round of this draft, choosing to go NBA vet (whether young or not so young) at the pg position. There are some I like in this draft, but that’s besides the point. Blair is not a bad pick at #19.

Also, I agree for the most part about the finesse in our frontcourt. My only exceptions would be Zaza and Horford. Horford’s a pretty tough customer when he’s healthy. Zaza just about has no choice, LOL! If he’s not rugged, he’s nothing.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
12:15 pm

Ray,

Not positive, but I’m pretty sure that the DraftExpress board is based on their evaluations of who the “best players” are, not an actual projection of who will go where. Because it perfectly tracks their “best players available by year and position” rankings.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
12:21 pm

KevinA,

Childress was a glue guy. Don’t run a play for him, and he still gives you the same number of points per game that Flip does. Flip’s the one who has a license to shoot…

Childress is easily a better defender/rebounder than Mo Evans. Watching Mo, I don’t think he fits so well here. The guy is a fairly chiseled 6′5″ 220 lbs, but small forward is a bit of a stretch for him. Childress is 6′8″ with a good wingspan, and he’s smarter. Not only that, but remember who handled the ball up and down the court, coming off the bench back when we didn’t have Flip (we had AJ and Lue)? Exactly: Childress. He played the 1 (sort of, as primary ball-handler), 2, and 3 (on occasion, the 4 in a small lineup) and provided energy where we needed it most: on the boards, and on defense. All the while, shooting 52% from the field, and not needing the ball in his hands to make plays.

Now we can yap all we want about getting Mo and Flip for less money total. But when you have to get two guys for the loss of one (okay, what’s coming is purely opinionated perspective) then that should tell you something.

Funny thing is, we still lacked the hustle, energy, and “glue.” And Flip is a UFA. And I was NOT impressed with Evans’ defense.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
12:27 pm

“In any case, I have no problem taking Blair with our second round pick, which is where Millsap was taken. But he won’t get any PT on the Hawks with our bevy of forwards, and I doubt he’ll end up being much of anything in the NBA.”

“Not positive, but I’m pretty sure that the DraftExpress board is based on their evaluations of who the “best players” are, not an actual projection of who will go where. Because it perfectly tracks their “best players available by year and position” rankings.”

Well, they have Blair listed at #11. I reckon you don’t agree with that assessment…

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
12:38 pm

Yeah. I just don’t get it. The only 6′7/6′8 wrecking ball type who has ever become a regular starter in the past 10 years is Ben Wallace. You’re much more likely to end up with a Shelden or Reggie Evans than a Wallace or even a Millsap or Big Baby. He’s not the type of guy you take in the lottery, or anywhere in the first round, unless you have a specific need at PF. For us, PF is the only position where we don’t have ANY real need. So spending our first round pick on that position would be odd.

Blair may well go higher to a team that – like us in 2006 – desperately needs a defensive/rebounding minded PF or C (remember that back then, more people thought Smoove would turn out to be a SF, not a PF). But if we take Blair, I have visions of people doing a 180 in January when he’s playing just 8 minutes a game and putting up pedestrian numbers even when he’s in. Because players of his height, frame, and lack of athleticism/offensive fluidity rarely become more than bit players.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
12:45 pm

PS – of the guys I mentioned (Wallace, Big Baby, Millsap, Evans, Shelden), Shelden was the ONLY one taken in the first round. And we already have an undrafted, undersized PF bruiser type (Othello Hunter). Just sayin.

tony

May 30th, 2009
12:57 pm

Big Ray, you will be eating crow next season. Mark My Word.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
12:59 pm

And lastly, just want to say that it’s NOT that I don’t like guys like Blair. I love bruisers who play with heart. But that doesn’t mean I think the Hawks should use their first-round pick on one when we already have a glut of 6′7-6′10 rotation players…

Sautee

May 30th, 2009
1:20 pm

Nire,

Are you purposely ignoring my question?

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
1:24 pm

Outside of a guard, I wasn’t seeing us getting a starter at #19, whether it’s this year or 2 to 3 years from now. Mullens is a serious risk/reward guy. I feel like with him you have two major risks: whether or not he actually develops that talent/potential, and whether or not we have the right place and system to help him do so.

But then, that’s a risk with any player you take. I think Mullens presents more of a risk in some ways.

Even with a pg or sg, we won’t get a starter out of this draft at that pick unless 1)We fail miserably in free agency/trade as far as keeping or acquiring a pg, or 2) Some serious injuries occur with the guys we DO manage to end up with at the pg and sg spots. Either way probably doesn’t bode well for us, but it could pay off in the long run. I suppose…

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
1:34 pm

Niremetal,

I’d rather take a good guard than Blair, but even then, I’m not ENTIRELY sure which guy that would be. And that’s no knock on Blair, just a position I think needs more attention.

I understand that we don’t have a huge need at PF. But I’m also not looking at a starter with that pick, unless it’s a guard. Now if Blair falls to #19, I figure all the guards worth picking that “high” are gone. So, I’d be okay with a guy whom I believe has what it takes to get more minutes than you say he will. I guess that’s where we disagree. Let’s say Zaza doesn’t re-sign, or isn’t in the plans for the future. Who does our rebounding off the bench? This guy ain’t Solo. Solo long, lean, athletic, and continuously gets pushed out of the paint. Love him, but he’s not a rugged type.

You shouldn’t insult Reggie Evans by putting him in the same sentence as Sheldon.

Here is a point of interest: if you don’t see a need at PF, then you must be happy with Josh Smith at that position, seeing as how that’s where he plays….;)

niremeNtal

May 30th, 2009
1:35 pm

Sautee,

Yes. I cannot answer it without painting meself into a corner.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
1:56 pm

Tony,

Eating crow about what? Thinking that Tyler Hansborough will not be a starter? Yeah, I could be wrong about that. But I don’t think it will happen anytime too soon, and maybe not at all. That doesn’t make him a bad player at all. He is a very heady, solid player. I just don’t see him starting. Not a knock on him at all. But hey, if you can cook it, I’ll eat it…

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
2:04 pm

Sautee,

I emailed you an answer to your question. Apparently, the blog decided it might be spam so it didn’t let me post it here.

Ray,

I actually think Josh is a perfectly good PF. I just think Horford will ultimately be a better one :) . It’s actually not even that I think Horford isn’t perfectly fine as a center – in today’s NBA, there are very few teams with true 7-foot, starting-caliber centers. Houston, Cleveland, Portland, and…who else? New Jersey? Keep in mind that Dwight is 6′11, not 7′0. Anyway, that’s beside the point. The point is more that even though I can definitely live with Horford at center, his athleticism, passing ability, and smooth mid-range game mean that he’d be BETTER as a PF – which just happens to be the best position for Josh as well.

The problem is that I don’t think Josh or Al is going anywhere for awhile. Al’s upside and very reasonable rookie contract makes it almost unthinkable that we would trade him. On the flipside, Josh has a long term, expensive contract, which will make it VERY tough for us to trade him in this stingy recession-time NBA market. So I think we’re “stuck” with both of them. That’s obviously not the worst thing is the world, but it does mean that we’ll be playing with 2 guys who would best utilized as PFs.

And THAT is why taking another PF would be kind of an odd move, especially since we have the option of bringing back Zaza (who already crashes the offensive glass, mixes it up underneath, and is 4 inches taller than Blair) and Hunter (who is a 6′8, bruising rebounding machine that we can sign for the minimum salary).

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:07 pm

Melvin,

Nice link. Can’t imagine why anybody would see THAT as unathletic….

tony

May 30th, 2009
2:09 pm

Big Ray, Tyler Hansborough has real skills and he has been this good since he got to UNC. He is the real deal. And he is the same size as Blake Griffin.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
2:13 pm

Heh. Forgot Bynum and Shaq. But you get the idea…

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:15 pm

Niremetal,

I’d love to see Hunter get more playing time. He has good, solid footwork and other fundamentals. I actually have more hopes for him than I did/do for Solo, believe it or not. And that’s nothing against Solo.

I’d like to keep Zaza. If we don’t, we will have to get another veteran big who is worth something, I just don’t see a way around it. Of course, that could mean more PT for Solo and Hunter, but is that the best option? Besides, a veteran big does more than just give you quality minutes. He also gives you quality teaching/mentoring in the locker room and on the practice court. Whatever they’re paying Ty Hill to do, he ain’t doin’ it….

Josh Smith’s contract may not look GREAT right now, but it’s a bargain in comparison to quite a few others, including the going rate for what you’re going to pay for somebody with his age, skills (oh, forgot, he doesn’t have those), potential, production, etc. Memphis did us a favor, is all I’m going to say. Besides, this so-called fabulous summer of 2010? All about big contracts….

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
2:17 pm

Ray,

I know you’re not gonna go on YouTube mix tapes of the BEST of a player to determine how athletic he is. There are some mix tapes that make Shelden look athletic, Speedy look an All-Star, and Smoove look like LeBron ;)

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:18 pm

Tony,

I’m not arguing that point. I’m just saying that I don’t see him as a starter. Maybe he will become one, maybe he won’t. I won’t bet any money on it either way. By the way, being the same size as someone else doesn’t make you smarter, dumber, stronger, weaker, faster, slower, better, or worse than they are.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
2:21 pm

Ray,

Oh, I’m not saying Josh is overpaid. But this year, I would lay odds that there aren’t more than 2-3 teams in the league that turned a profit. Josh’s contract will be a bargain once the economy turns around. But until the economy turns around, any contract paying $44M over 4 years will scare off teams unless the name of the player is LeBron or Dwight – i.e. someone who you KNOW will put butts in seats.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:22 pm

Niremetal,

Um, Smoove doesn’t need a tape to look like Lebron when it comes to athleticism. He matches him. Lebron’s skills and intangibles are what separates the two (just for starters). Ever read the article on NBA.com about which guy outjumps the other?

I’ve never seen footage that made Sheldon look athletic. I’ve never seen anything that made Speedy look like an all-star. Please do post THOSE links….they must have been what convinced Billy Knight to do what he did, right?

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:26 pm

“Can’t imagine why anybody would see THAT as unathletic.”

What was on that tape looked athletic to me. What I saw in tournament footage looked athletic. It’s about what you expect from a guy who is 6′6.5″ and about 280 lbs. Just sayin’….

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:32 pm

Draft Express says Dejaun Blair has average athleticism.

Hmmmmm….does that mean they found his mix tapes to be “average?”

:)

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:42 pm

Yeah, I believe that. Which is why it’s going to be interesting what Sund does to keep things in line talent-wise, and finance-wise. Not an easy job, but one he gets paid to do…

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
2:43 pm

DraftExpress has us taking Eric Maynor.

What’s everybody think of that?

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
3:12 pm

Forget the Douglas kid from FSU. If we don’t take 1 of the top 7 pg at #19. I say we pick this Curtis Jerrells from Baylor. This kids has the size, penterates and handles like AC, shoot from distance like Salim and elevates like Mario. With those comparisons I just made him a Hawk. Passing skills! Who cares, just shoot it…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9anGAmF9sg

Astro Joe

May 30th, 2009
4:47 pm

Ray, Maynor would be a great pick at #19 and I would applaud that selection. But I think that once he starts working out for teams, he’ll be selected ahead of us. Look, we’re likely getting a rotational player at #19. We just finished with a 4th seed and not because we have weakness amongst that starting 5.

Millsap, Bass, Powe, Big Baby… all those guys may have been selected in the second round but they make first round type contributions. Any player who can deliver meaningful production in about 15-18 minutes on a top 4-5 team in the conference is far more likely to be a mid/late first rounder than a second rounder.

RealSquawk

May 30th, 2009
5:06 pm

Tony,

The team is not better with Marvin not in the starting line up. What are you looking at to determine that? And Tyler Hansborough can’t take Marvin’s place if thats what you were saying, but he would help the team. I know nothing of Siler except that he is going late second round. And alot of people
passed on Bynum because he was a project. Seeing how we are great at developing players and putting them in situations to succeed it would have been great to take him.

Big Ray,
I don’t think Smoove matches LEbron athletically. He might be able to jump as high, but he isn’t as fast or balanced. And Lebron is carrying more weight whether it be muscle or not. On top of all that Lebron is just more stable athletically with so much more control.

Flip was a great addition. I thought Mo was going to be a little bit more athletic, but trust me if we brought Childress back he would quickly remind you how much he meant to this team.

As far as who I think we should draft……. I don’t know we need to get bigger Seven Feet big, but if Acie Law leaves we will need a point guard. there won’t be anybody there to add any real think at that pick in Woody’s system so I would say Holiday like Tony said earlier.

What we should really do is trade the pick away to a team we know won’t be out of the lottery anytime soon for a future pick that they will probably want to protect. Maybe we can put Mo with it and bring back Chill and then our bench will be boosted.

O'brien

May 30th, 2009
5:08 pm

Hopefully after drafting Swift, Petro, and Sene, Sund has learned his lesson when it comes to big guys. BJ Mullens MIGHT become a solid player in this league, but with Woody as the coach, we will never know.

I am okay with the Hawks drafting a PG at 19, but if thats the plan, I hope they have a plan for Acie and Speedy.

I would love to have Chills coming off the bench with Flip, because we want someone to rebound on the offensive glass (we know Flip will miss a bunch of shots), so between Zaza and Chills, I think we’d be okay there. Mo Evans needs to be our backup SG (he is not tall enough to be a backup SF). And we need to sign a backup SF, and one reason I like Charlie Villaneuva is because he can provide backup minutes at PF and SF (although his defense is suspect).

I agree that the Lakers will not resign Lamar Odom. The Lakers will let Trevor Ariza and Luke Walton take care of the SF position.

Big Ray

May 30th, 2009
5:10 pm

Astro Joe,

I hear you.

All I'm Saying Is...

May 30th, 2009
5:57 pm

Why waste a pick on a point guard again when you can sign Andre Miller, re-sign Mike Bibby, and retain Flip? Instead, package our current first round pick, Marvin, and Acie and trade up to get a legit big man—I’d rather it be Thabeet but I’ll take BJ Mullens. Then we can move Al to power forward (his natural position) and have ZaZa be the super sub that he is. Last, if he is unrestricted, sign someone like Nate Robinson to come in and be an uptempo point guard option to exploit the advantages of Josh. This way we can play half-court, walk it up basketball which you have to do in the playoffs and run the break too.

All I'm Saying Is...

May 30th, 2009
5:59 pm

Oh, and by the way, I bet the kid from FSU does not even get drafted —- which means we can sign him to a free agent deal and bring him to camp.

O'brien

May 30th, 2009
7:16 pm

In Sekou’s first mock draft, he has Ty Lawson falling into the Hawks lap at 19. “After years of getting it wrong at this position, the Hawks get lucky and Lawson falls in their lap in a deep point guard draft”.

Ty Lawson is fast, but if Woody insists on playing halfcourt/walk it up offense, doesnt that take away lawson’s strength? And he is only 5-11.

Sekou, why do you think the Hawks will take Lawson over Jeff Teague?

Ca$h

May 30th, 2009
8:04 pm

ok lets b real lets trade Joe Johnson he took 1,420 (a rookie could do this)shotsONLY avg 20.0pg.Even if Woodson runs all of the plays through you set up other players we can’t bench you.Joe you are not a Kobe or LeBron even Wade look at it Wade even pass the ball in playoffs. Together Smith and Horford took 1,443 shots he holding players back. Lets find a real SG that plays team ball in draft or trade 2 for one.

Ed

May 30th, 2009
9:21 pm

Just read this on line on cnnsi…thought it was pretty interesting.

Suns star Amare Stoudemire discussed his future Friday. Besides questions about recovery from his damaged retina, Stoudemire addressed his career down the road. From February trade discussions to his ability to opt out from his Suns contract next summer. To one in Atlanta, where he just visited, “They would love for me to be in Atlanta,” but adding, “I still should be in Phoenix next season.” To a D.C. radio station, there is a “50 percent chance” he would be with the Suns this fall.

Sautee

May 30th, 2009
9:27 pm

It’s amazing how many times LeBron moves his pivot foot BEFORE the dribble hits the floor. Anybody ever seen him called for it?

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
9:34 pm

Sautee,
He’s allow to shuffle his feet but he better not attempt another crab dribble…

RealSquawk

May 30th, 2009
9:50 pm

So lets do an Amare Stoudemire trade for Acie Law and Josh Smith!!

Astro Joe

May 30th, 2009
9:52 pm

Sounds like Joe is still trying to recruit Amare. One thing about Stat, he seems to be a true Alpha Male. Al almost $17M a year, Smith & Speedy would be enough to make it work from a salary perspective. That would be a very bold move if Sund made that deal. Bringingin a guy who could be a true superstar with the right PG AND some health. And frankly, I’d be more worried about the health than the PG.

bigdave

May 30th, 2009
9:52 pm

Barkley: “these ain’t no damn Hawks…”

RealSquawk

May 30th, 2009
9:54 pm

Or mo evans and speedy with Josh Smith for Amare

KevinA

May 30th, 2009
9:57 pm

You guys know this trade stuff better than I. Why would aybody want to take Speedy at 5 mil. Would giving our draft with Speedy entice someone to take him off our books? This whould help fund the Chills deal?.

niremetal

May 30th, 2009
10:16 pm

Speedy has an expiring contract. That’s a bargaining chip in and of itself. Unlike Amare, who’s on the hook for two more seasons.

bigdave

May 30th, 2009
10:18 pm

i think its important that we remember what system the Hawks play in when it comes to drafting and free agency. since we iso every position on the floor i think we need to bring in these type of players, someone who can create his own shot or score in one on one situations. Blair or Hansboro (travel… travel… every time) doesnt do that for me… his size will be an issue in our system.

i do however like the idea of drafting a Toney D. the boy can create, shoot, defend, has a lot of heart.. a pure dog. i also like Sam Young from Pitt. he’s been there like forever. to me he’s NBA ready.. a versatile scoring threat (that nasty pump fake) and a solid defender. He appears to be a guy who will get to the line a lot at the next level.

O'brien

May 30th, 2009
10:21 pm

KevinA, Speedy is attractive because his reasonable $5.25 mil contract expires next year, which is when all the big name free agents will be available.

Astro Joe, like you, I am also very concerned about Amare’s health (knee injury, eye injury), and his salary demands too. If Josh goes to Phoenix, I think his game would reach another level (playing with a pass first PG, and an uptempo team).

(Although if we had a different head coach/different PG I think Josh’s game would improve even more).

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
11:02 pm

Watching Dwight “Superman” Howard carry his Orlando Magic team to the NBA finals, I couldn’t help but blame David Stern that its not the Atlanta Hawks going to the finals instead of the Magic b/c he could have given the Hawks the same hometown hookup that he Cavs for the No.1 draft slot. It wasn’t like the Magic hadn’t won two No.1 lottery picks (Shaq, Webber) prior to the Dwight Howard sweepstakes…

Fire David Stern

Mike is back

May 30th, 2009
11:04 pm

Well, it appears I was right…LA AND ORLANDO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DHOWARD, WAY TO REPRESENT DAWGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Like I said…if I was the Hawks drafting a PG in this year draft…I would wait until the second round. Sund should be working on some combination to get a Big with that 19th pick. FA, move up…make a trade…Absent that the best move is to give Acie shot.

bigdave

May 30th, 2009
11:06 pm

CONGRATS TO THE HOMEBOY… GO WIN THE TITLE!!

hey Melvin… i doubt Orlando lets another Hall of Fame center walk…

Mike is back

May 30th, 2009
11:07 pm

Thanks basketball gods for given us a great match-up in the NBA Finals!!!!

SUND…BRING CHILL BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
11:09 pm

Doc,

There will be no popcorn sold during the Finals series… Ha,ha Lorenzo will not get that ring this year….

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
11:11 pm

bigdave,

IF the Magic do that, the may as well move that franchise to Seattle…

Melvin

May 30th, 2009
11:15 pm

I’m sure Shaq wont get any sleep this summer know that two of his favorite persons (Kobe and Van Gundy) will win the championship this year… Shaq, how’s Kobe @#$ taste….lol

Mike is back

May 30th, 2009
11:22 pm

Let’s see how Mr. Cheese…Kenny the Jet Smith puts a spin on this lost. I his remember his great speech when LBJ went down by 3-1…will he finally admit that Cavs support players are no better than the Hawks…save for foul calls. Probably not…but it was evident during the Conference Final.

IF I CAN’T CHEER FOR THE HAWKS…MIGHT AS WELL…ROLL WITH MY HOMEBOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Want be mad who ever wins the NBA title…should be a great finals…but I gotta go with Orland!!!!!!!!

Ernest

May 30th, 2009
11:29 pm

Great win by the magic! Looks like ‘Iso Lebron’ could not overcome the Magic. Wonder if the Cleveland fans will suggest they trade him…

MannyT

May 30th, 2009
11:31 pm

You guys are braver with the ASG pocketbook than I am.

Super successful recovery from microfracture surgery. Cannot move his head quickly while recovering from detached retina. At some point, doesn’t Amare’s medical miracle luck run out (as far as being a NBA quality super athlete?) That’s $31 mil in salary that would make me too nervous…especially prior to getting the ownership situation settled. I’d hate for us to win the NBA title as the Washington Super Generals after the ASG has to get bailed out by the government. All the players would have to get souped up GM cars per order of the Hoops Czar.

anyhow…How about that Magic team?

What am I supposed to do until Thursday? How can I make it without Charles Barkley as a studio analyst until November?

For all you conspiracy theorists, it looks like the NBA Finals schedule works out so Tiger Woods could be in the Orlando audience before he heads off to the US Open…hmmm

Should I start posting Judas to Jesus All star trades…like this one 8-O
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=mjyf6l

BWAF

Mike is back

May 30th, 2009
11:32 pm

Bigdave, love Sam Young… I think he will be a great player in the NBA…but we are overloaded at the SF and PF positions…we would have to clear out some room on the roster.

I see Kenny is still in denial…want give the Magic any credit…hmmmm!!! BARKLEY WAS RIGHT…THE BEST TEAM WON!!!

Joe Johnson

May 30th, 2009
11:35 pm

Did Lebron James get…TIRED???

Sweet Baby Jesus

May 30th, 2009
11:36 pm

Some of us still don’t know the difference between “want” and “won’t” after all this time?

Seriously?

bigdave

May 30th, 2009
11:37 pm

I wouldnt say loaded Mike is Back…

Josh is not and will never be a SF and we should let Marvin walk… i Sam Young is a slasher/scorers (would off set our shooters)… someone who can attack the basket, and he has a good touch from 3 a mid range and post game… ill start him immediately at 3 in place of Marvin…

Kenny is just rides nuts of all the major superstars in the league so they’ll say whats up to him in the clubs or what not… and Barkely is a D. Howard fan… but he was right…

Sekou Smith

May 30th, 2009
11:40 pm

Four words. Trevor Ariza. Mickael Pietrus.

Good night Cleveland.

RealSquawk

May 30th, 2009
11:52 pm

Joe Johnson
that might actually be Joe Johnson!
Hey JOe how are you doing?

bigjohnhawksfan

May 30th, 2009
11:55 pm

Just so I understand this right:

Mickael Pietrus can guard MVP’s one-on-one AND shoot corner 3’s??

Get his agent on the phone NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe Johnson

May 30th, 2009
11:57 pm

I’m alright, folk, but watching all this playoff basketball has gotten be TIRED!!!

Bernie Mullen

May 30th, 2009
11:59 pm

Michael Gearon, Jr. is featured in this week’s Atlanta Business Chronicle. Apparently he wants to build a winner in Atlanta… If the lawsuit is over this summer as the article says, it will be time for ownership to put up or shut up!!

doc

May 31st, 2009
12:03 am

sweeet!

queenie is woofing with his mm instead of going before the press. he is a grown man not acting like one. was surprised to see him duck out of the arena rather than say his grace to the winners. got to learn how to lose as well as you win queenie boy.

didnt someone respond negatively about howard saying he needed the ball and to give it to him? didnt it seem like he didnt appreciate the guy talking out loud? still think it sometimes takes a strong individual to get the coaches attention instead of the other way around. it will have to happen from horford as well before this team will go to the next level and really have horford be the leader and man some think he can become. j smith is still the guy with nads on the hawks.

gonna be fun as two talented teams take the court.

this also makes the hawks look like they have a long way to go.

Prince Lebron James

May 31st, 2009
12:14 am

No autographs. No questions. I have to have a long talk with a puppet.

Nike Marketing Department

May 31st, 2009
12:15 am

We’ve just finished filming our new Kobe and Lebron…I mean Dwight puppet commercials!!

darrell starks

May 31st, 2009
12:24 am

Way go D wade oops i mean D Howard MY HOME BOY FROM THE A LETS GO GIT IT!!!!!!!!!
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ca$h

May 31st, 2009
12:57 am

ok lets b real lets trade Joe Johnson he took 1,420 (a rookie could do this)shotsONLY avg 20.0pg.Even if Woodson runs all of the plays through you set up other players we can’t bench you.Joe you are not a Kobe or LeBron even Wade look at it Wade even pass the ball in playoffs. Together Smith and Horford took 1,443 shots he holding players back. Lets find a real SG that plays team ball in draft or trade 2 for one.

Big Ray

May 31st, 2009
7:51 am

Ha!

Looks like Lebron’s season just went up in a puff of…..powder. Oh, and the rest of the Cavs lost, too.

Hmmmmm. Who got coach of the year again? Stan Van Gundy gets on my damn nerves, but his team beat the guy who has Lebron James. His team beat the COY AND the MVP. Youch!

Unfortunately, he’s not going to beat Phil and his crew….or is he? Heh heh heh.

I heard somebody once say that the difference between Mike Brown and Mike Woodson is Brown has Lebron, while Woodson has Joe Johnson. Hell, I don’t know, that’s just what I heard…

So what’s the crazy trade proposal special of the day?

All I'm Saying is....

May 31st, 2009
8:04 am

….I’m retarded.

Bee

May 31st, 2009
8:14 am

Players perform for people who push them to the limit ……Woodson must go

Big Ray

May 31st, 2009
8:17 am

I have more respect for Barkley than I do Kenny. Kenny is just so full of himself these days, and is almost as annoying as Stephen A. Smith.

Congrats to Howard and his teammates for the victory. They damn sure earned it. As Doc says, it shows us just how far we have to go, and that would be a long ways. Amazing how much difference there is between this 4th seed and that 3rd seed, eh? Oh, we could go on and on about what the differences are, but I can tell you they are all summed up by who walks our sidelines and who runs the hardwood. Sund is the man whose job it is to determine both.

doc

May 31st, 2009
10:06 am

at least we dont have to hear the delusion that we are the third best team in the league this summer, eh ray?

ILL-logical

May 31st, 2009
11:14 am

Congratulations to the Orlando Magic for resounding win last night and good luck in the Chanmpionship Finals! ( I did not remember that they beat the Lakers 2-0 last season)

With all of the speculation about the Hawk’s ownership’s financial condition; the GM’s draft track record ,the current head coach’s status and who will be on next season’s roster ther are a few possibilities that haven’t gotten a great deal of attention. So in the interest of interpetitive clarity, I would like to submit the folowing for your discussion and analysis:

IF you look at the ASG financial picture over the 2 years, the resolution of how much Belkin’s 30 % is worth will have occurred and he will have accord and satisfaction. However, that will mean that the Thrashers will have to sold and new investors must be found. Chris “Ludicris” Brides may be a prime candidate once the smoke clears. That should improve the money and the marketing.

The current GM will probably noy make mant major moves because of finances other than to try and get some more experienced depth. Since the team is operating from a position of relative weakness-other teams know that they are trying to unload Acie and Marvin and will not offer back fair market value- he is constained.

As far as Woodson is concerned, he ia a dead man walking. Sund can say that he didn’t fire him after this year’s record but with the players looking at his position he cannot be effective and after the season’s inevitable first losing streak , he is history. Which raises the conundrum of whether or not you draft/ sign free agents to fit the current system or the new system? This factor bears a close watch.

Finally, Soloman Jones , with an extra 20 lbs, may be the short term answer to Who is at the 5. ZaZa is history according to SS. And there are few bigs that fit the current coach’s system and while Sund has his eyes on the Chris Kamans of the world, a more practical solution is to resign Solo to a 2 year ,$4 million deal(1/2 of ZaZa’s current salary but a 50% plus increase for Solo) and hire a trainer and Antonio Davis to get him the heft and help to add to his shotblocking and shooting skills. Solo’s downfall with the current head coach came when he opted not to go to the summer league but work out on his own. Woodson doesn’t like often injuried players,rookies and players who fail to heed his “suggestions”.But Solo at 250-260 lbs can be a very, very interesting asset.

I went with Chuck’s pick in the Eastern conference finals but I’m going to have to go with Lakers in 7 for the big dance.

Melvin

May 31st, 2009
11:37 am

“Hawks unrestricted free agent Josh Childress is sure to return to the NBA as well, maintain sources, but not to Atlanta. His high opinion of himself (starter vs. subs) conflicted with coach Mike Woodson.” Peter Vecsey- New York Post

I guess the above statemaent would’ve been more creditable had Vecsey wouldn’t have referred to Childress as an unrestricted free agent…

niremetal

May 31st, 2009
11:51 am

Melvin,

Ha! You got him pegged.

LeBron showed no class by not congratulating the Magic. I lost some respect for him over that. The Magic played their butts off and deserved to win this series.

LeBron might have put up some gaudy offensive stats, but his defense in this series was abysmal (everyone remember Pietrus getting wide open under the basket twice last night?) and he turned the ball over way too much. Pietrus had no chance of guarding LeBron this series, but LeBron forgot that there’s a whole other side of the court that he has to play on. The loss is as much on him as on his teammates, the slobbering media reports to the contrary notwithstanding. Just because you score 40 points per game doesn’t mean you’re doing what it takes for your team to win.

Astro Joe

May 31st, 2009
11:52 am

Melvin, that and it came from Vecsey, who is wrong more often than not.

I’m expecting that Delonte West will be readily available. Cavs won’t likey try to go with a small backcourt next season.

niremetal

May 31st, 2009
12:01 pm

And if anyone follows tennis…Nadal just lost a match at the French Open for the first time ever. Damn – the kings are falling all over the place!

Sautee

May 31st, 2009
12:01 pm

Nire,

Co-sign on LeBron. No class.

Makes me sad, ’cause I think he’s a good kid.

Maybe he’ll learn, but I think his image will take a hit from running away from the loss.

Big Ray

May 31st, 2009
12:05 pm

Doc,

I don’t think that will be a worry. Thing is, depending on what gets done this summer, I look for us to get ranked lower by the experts and pundits. They do it every time. Why stop now?

Ill-logical,

I’d like to see solo at 250-260, but I feel that he does not have the frame for it. Doubt we’ll ever see him any bigger than 245 lbs.

Big Ray

May 31st, 2009
12:44 pm

Peter Vescey is full of it.

No doubt Lebron’s pride is throbbing somethin’ fierce right about now. Well, it happens. A few opinionated observations.

1)The Cavs were completely untested in the playoffs, prior to that series with the Magic. Boston was the only team in a long time that was able to go straight to a championship after being horrible the year before. The reason? Three talented veterans in the starting lineup(two of which were serious battle-tested veterans), 3 hard-bitten/playoff battle-tested veterans on the bench, a battle-tested coach with the right intangibles (yes, I know…a coach with “intangibles), and a confident, well-developed group of youngsters (including on the bench).

Pick what you want from that comma-ridden run-on sentence, and see which parts Cleveland was missing. Should be obvious.

2)So many were ready to hand the East, the Championship, even the NBA to Lebron for the next decade. Not so fast. A certain talented 2-guard from UNC had to take his lumps as well, before dominating the entire NBA (including better Cleveland teams than the one Lebron leads). For all of Lebron’s incredible talent, skill, and physical awesomeness…he doesn’t quite dominate the game like Jordan did. Not yet.

And Jordan had to go through that “not yet” phase, too. Why wouldn’t Lebron? Jordan faced tougher teams than these Orlando Magic. How about those Pistons Bad Boys? Lebron is indeed, undeniably great. But he’s not quite there yet. Getting close, though, especially if Cleveland can muster what it’s going to take to get them over the hump. But it’s not all about just putting more guys around him. Lebron still has things to learn.

3)Lebron is more dangerous than just about anybody in the league when it comes to getting to the basket. The last guy anywhere near his size that I recall being that damned difficult to deal with as far as attacking the rim was a young and healthy Grant Hill.

But guess what? He also needs help from the refs (which he gets), and he’s in trouble if you make him shoot from the outside a lot. Guys like Jordan/Kobe would kill you from 20 feet all day long. They’d MAKE you guard them out on the perimeter, then kill you going to the bucket. Lebron has to become deadlier from mid and long range. Sometimes you just can’t get enough calls.

I think he found that out.

4)Let the rumors begin. With the Cavs having lost to the Magic, you can expect to hear more crap about Lebron leaving Cleveland. I don’t even want to get into it, as it will be talked about by every pundit from here to Timbuktu (and any places Dr. Seuss can think of) until he signs a freakin’ contract. Ugh. Yeah, I know better. I’ll get sucked into that conversation with somebody sooner or later. Resistance is futile, and all that….

5)Despite what work Lebron has to put in on his game, the onus is still on the Cavaliers organization for the most part. Big Z isn’t getting younger, faster, or in better condition as the years go by. Varejao is a nice piece, but you’d rather have him to rely on as a super sub, not a starter. Joe Smith’s energy just got sapped. Losing will do that to you, but he’s good for another year or so before he pulls a PJ Brown.

Ben Wallace sucks monkey nuts. There, I said it.

JJ Hickson is TBD. Not a bad player. Wally Szczerbiak = decent role player sometimes. Delonte West is a very nice piece that somebody else might get to appreciate even more. Mo Williams can do his thing for several more years, but it ain’t enough.

Say what you want about the home team having the edge. I’m not predicting a single thing except an increase in the amount of Advil that Danny Ferry buys over the summer….

O'brien

May 31st, 2009
1:19 pm

I think one of Cleveland’s problems is that they didnt have that reliable 3rd option (although in reality they didnt have a reliable second option either).

When the Lakers win, they have Kobe, Gasol, and somebody else (either Odom or Ariza) usually stepping up. Orlando has Howard, Lewis and Turkoglu (and Pietrus sometimes). When Boston won last year, they had the big 3. To be successful, you need a big 2, and somebody to step up and be that 3rd option sometimes.

Last year when the Hawks lost to the Celtics, everybody was quick to point out “we took the eventual NBA champions to 7 games”, and “we were the third best team in the playoffs”. What do we say this year? I think it says the Hawks (including Joe Johnson) have a long way to go.

Anybody interested in Joe Smith? he is unrestricted, only made $1.2 mil this year.

Melvin

May 31st, 2009
3:18 pm

Obrien,

Its hard to see Joe Smith leaving the Cavs but if he does, I think the Hawks should look at him, McDyess or maybe Sheed as FA bigs to sign next season…

Ariose

May 31st, 2009
3:43 pm

Sczerbiak used tobe a Premier SF in this leauge. Now he’s just a Spot up fringe starter..

Guards come and Go….but Austin Daye can be special…

Sautee

May 31st, 2009
4:50 pm

Ariose,

By Premier do you mean “one All-Star appearance” (2002)?

I guess we have different ideas about “premier”, but that’s ok.

Wally is certainly NOT the player he was before knee and ankle injuries.
Gotta feel for him.

cdog

May 31st, 2009
4:50 pm

DON’T MAKE LEBRON JAMES MAD HUH MARK BRADLEY, MARV ALBERT, AND JON BARRY. WHO CARES ABOUT HIM BEING MAD. GOOD INSIDE DEFENSE FROM GOOD BIG MEN WILL OFFSET THE MADNESS FROM JAMES. RICK SUND AND THE HAWKS CAN;T SEEM TO GET THIS IN THEIR SKULLS. THEY ARE MORE WORRIED ABOUT A SHOOTER AND A POINT GUARD. OFFENSE WINS FANS, DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS.THATS WHAT THE HAWKS SHOULD BE SHOOTING NOT JUST TO MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. THE MAJIC DID’T WORRY ABOUT JAMES BEING MAD

Big Ray

May 31st, 2009
5:08 pm

O’Brien,

Joe Smith looks good. I’ve seen too many vets come here and just die, though. I think Joe has gotten to the point where he prefers a contender. A real contender, not just a team that is or “could be” good. We’ve proven we were “good enough” this year, but in order to be truly good, we have to maintain that level. Can we? Yeah. But there have to be some changes.

Veterans like Joe Smith seem to be energized and play well on good teams. Being on a good team is motivating. When they’re on a not-so-good team, they just don’t play as well. There is something about this team that only guys like Flip Murray seem to buck the trend with.

Look at Anthony Johnson, and how he contributed to Orlando. He played well enough here, but he just wasn’t the same. I would say that when roles are more defined, you see this more often.

Flip Murray is an exception because dude works like a demon to have a job in the league. He almost had to go overseas last year. After this year’s performance, He won’t have much harder of a time getting a job than Bibby will, though for less beans…

Ariose

May 31st, 2009
5:34 pm

Sautee, yeah I meant he player vhe was before the injuries he wasa “Mr. Energy” type of player…

Blast

May 31st, 2009
6:44 pm

Happy for the Magic team. Great WIN. Sorry Cleveland, I thought this year was your time, but your weakness was exposed by Magic just as you did Hawks. LeBron was crushed, but not congratulating the Magic was childish. The Finals will be entertaining. I hope Orlando Magic wins it all.

Melvin

May 31st, 2009
6:45 pm

J-MAN

May 31st, 2009
7:08 pm

We need to trade Joe Johnson to get some bigs to contain lebron and compete inside with D. Howard next season. Resign Flip and Zaza and use Childress as a trade piece. Resign Bibby IF its under 6 mil. Resign M. Williams or use him for trade bait. WE NEED MORE BIGS STAT!!! So we can finally outrebound somebody in this league or at least a YMCA league team.

doc

May 31st, 2009
8:45 pm

by this comment from lebron, the man child we thought was more the man, reveals nothing more than a potentially petulant boy:

“It’s hard for me to congratulate somebody after you just lose to them,” he said. “I’m a winner. It’s not being a poor sport or anything like that. If somebody beats you up, you’re not going to congratulate them. That doesn’t make sense to me. I’m a competitor. That’s what I do. It doesn’t make sense for me to go over and shake somebody’s hand.”

as many have said and what i thought saying to myself poor sportsmanship as i watched him march off the court without acknowledging the other team i thought he had huge misunderstanding of sports and sportsmanship. when you are vanquished you acknowledge that as a man does face to face to honor them and also realize they have just made you better. we prepare kids to win when just as often it is important to teach them to lose head high. jack nicklaus was the greatest at it, finished second many times but still has tiger chasing him for total majors winning his last at 46.

maybe as lAbron matures, which he still has a lot of time to do, wins and loses a a few more as he will, then he can go back and review it and get it right. until then he is queenie to me. heh heh

Melvin

May 31st, 2009
9:28 pm

Doc,

He brought into all the hype that surrounded him. Now he has to go home with his tail between his legs and hide behind his momma (just like Kenyon Martin). His explanation for his actions was an excuse as he can’t handle defeat. I don’t recall him storming off the court at the end of the Pistons/Hawks series while he enjoyed the pixie dust rain on his head. Yep, he definitely has some growing up to do and I hope the media shed light on those very same statements as you did….

I guess he’s too young to remember Public Ememy b/c he should have “Don’t believe the HYPE”…. Yeah boyeee

niremetal

May 31st, 2009
9:37 pm

Trade our only proven scorer to get big? Isn’t that just solving one problem but creating another? I promise you, we don’t make the East Finals if we trade JJ for a big whose name isn’t Dwight or Yao.

dub shoddy

May 31st, 2009
9:39 pm

Turgolu would meet many of the Hawks needs. Getting a center may just be a lost cause in this era, but at least we would have a consistent outside shooter.

I wish that the Cavs had something to offer us, b/c they could sure use a big 2 guard like Joe Johnson… I am a Joe fan, but he has had a consistency problem for his entire career. I would certainly consider offers for him…

Woody, unfortunately is a lame duck. If he is not winning in the 1st 20 – 25 games (& another potential hire is out there), he will be gone. Not the best way to instill confidence in an employee. I think he deserved at least a 3 year deal for getting the Hawks into the playoffs for 2 years.

O'brien

May 31st, 2009
9:50 pm

I also lost some respect for Lebron the way he walked off the court without congratulating the Magic, and he didnt stick around to talk to reporters either. What would he have said if when the Cavs beat the Hawks (and Pistons) all our players walked off the court without congratulating anybody…

Ray, that’s a good point about vets, especially at that age. Guys like Drew Gooden and Joe Smith might prefer a perennial contender. If that’s the case though, the Hawks might have to overpay for somebody like Villanueva (who I really like because he can give you backup minutes at the 3 and the 4).

Charlie is not known for his defense, so if we could get him and a defensive backup center like Gortat, that would be a good pickup in my opinion.

doc

May 31st, 2009
9:54 pm

melvin, so right you are, also folks will not take labron as seriously is my guess. this should not have been unexpected. the cavs sucked against the better teams as their record was 3 and 9 against their peers. they were lucky to have gotten a second win against the hawks. they got to get someone to take some of the physical stuff off queenie, too. if wallace retires that will help them cap wise and there are going to be some studs willing to go there for sure.

gonna be fun to see if the magic can pull it off. howard may become a household word soon. make way, the guy spoke up and delivered huge.

now, if we can get some of that rubbed off on josh and al then we be bad, if woody lets them play more. they have to get the ball into their hands more is the bottom line.

darrell starks

May 31st, 2009
9:55 pm

One thing chill have always said that he wants to be a starte thats was one of the problems that chill and woody never could see eye to eye on.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

The Truth

May 31st, 2009
9:59 pm

doc

I totally agree with your 8:45 pm post regarding “queenie” Lebron. This loss has revealed a big character flaw for him. At this point in his young career, it is apparent that James is lacking in the class department. Being a sore loser will not serve him well with Ad endorsements especially after the media beats him up over this. If he had made the “Bone headed” statement during regular season, he could play himself out of it. But since he has gone fishing for the summer, the sport media doesn’t have anything else to talk about but his unsportsmanlike conduct and the championship playoff until the draft.

Also, if his behavior is a litmus test of just how big his ego is, then the Cleveland Cavs Organization will may end up in the poor house trying to re-sign him. With such a big ego, King James will not tolerate not being the highest paid player in the league. This ego will not allow him to be second bananas in salary compared to other player in the world.

From this observation, there is no comparison between LJ and MJ at this point. He still has a long way to go to back like Mike.

darrell starks

May 31st, 2009
10:02 pm

I would rather have chill back than marvin chill plays more under control than marvin plus he rebounds on both ends of the court marvin looks sloppy when out there playing and he tries to be to cool the only edge i would give marvin is his jump shot other than that i would take chill in a heart beat.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

May 31st, 2009
10:05 pm

Darrell,

I noticed it has been widely reported that Chills wanted to be a starter but I haven’t seen anybody quoted him saying that. Similiar to JSmoove dislike for Woody…

darrell starks

May 31st, 2009
10:10 pm

Now acie could be a beast in my opinion if under the right coach some one like avery who him self was a point guard can groom acie in to a special player i dont think woody is that type of coach.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

May 31st, 2009
10:19 pm

O yes MELVIN in a interview that he had with the media he quoted that he would like to starte and then he said some people dont see me like that and he was talking about coach woody.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Ken Strickland

May 31st, 2009
10:22 pm

After Lebron’s childish and cowardly way of dealing with adversity, it looks like JJohnson’s passive type of leadership isn’t all that bad after all.

The Hawks will never get to the next level, or even maintain their current level, if they don’t stop turning it’s roster over so often. This yr, we could end up losing 2 starters, Bibby and Marvin, and 3 of our subs, Flip, Zaza and Solo. Next yr, we’ll almost certainly lose Acie and JJ.

If Sund continues his passive approach in dealing with his FA’s, and continues to undervalue his players like he did Chills, JSmith, and maybe Horford, will end up being the core of the team. I blame the SAASG for all that ails the Hawks. After all, it’s been their stupidity and infighting that’s created all of our instability and financial problems. If they hadn’t prevented former GM BKnight from firing HC MWoodson, or forced him to resign, I guarantee you we wouldn’t have our current HC issues, Chills would have been resigned and we wouldn’t have gone through last yrs JSmith fiasco. We’d probably be getting more production out of Acie and Solo, maybe even Hunter and Richardson as well.

SOMETHING TELLS ME THE 08-09 SEASON IS GOING TO BE ABOUT AS GOOD AS IT GETS FOR THE HAWKS.

dap01

May 31st, 2009
10:30 pm

Labron: Need to work on that class. He flunked the character test last night. I hope he learns something from that way he reacted. He needs to act like a winner, not just say that he is a winner. The refs were just as sad.

Come on Sund, surprise us!

darrell starks

May 31st, 2009
10:43 pm

QUESTION TO ANY ONE IS TO LATE TO HIRE AVERY JOHNSON ?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

The Truth

May 31st, 2009
10:59 pm

darrell starks

It’s not that it is too late to hire Avery Johnson. Exactly, it is too early. Sund will at least let Woody play out the one year left on his current contract. After that, all bets are off. However, given our franchise history, ownership has a bigger tolerance for failure so nothing will surprise me if things go south.

Hoops

May 31st, 2009
11:09 pm

Ken Strickland is right! Unless the Hawks make some bold moves this summer, being 4th in the East is going to be about as good as it gets! We had an aging PG and no center and two PF. We need a young athletic PG (Devin Harris can be signed for 10M or less) and a starting 5. Trade Josh Smith and Marvin for Memphis’ # 2 pick, M. Gasol and Gay and use the cap space money to sign Harris and resign Flip and Zaza. You will also have money to sign Charlie V. I bet you could package Acie, Morris and our #19 pick to move up enough to pick Curry if Memphis will not trade.
PG-Harris, Flip
SG-JJ, Curry
SF-Gay, Evans
PF-Horford, Charlie V
C-M. Gasol, Thabeet, Zaza

Come on Hawks, make some moves!!!

VitaminWater Marketing Department

June 1st, 2009
1:39 am

We are SO screwed…

OUTLAW30079

June 1st, 2009
1:40 am

Can we plz get jamal crawford and charlie v he is better than williams if zaza go {which he will everyone have seen him playing hard} bring da man they draft a couple years ago and let stay across da water and for a top off PLZ GO GET ANDRA MILLER

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
7:46 am

O’brien,

I like the idea of getting Villanueva as well. It would be nice to re-sign Flip, and getting Villanueva means we don’t have to rely on Flip as the sole source of points off the bench. That’s precisely how we ended up running starters into the ground.

Ken Strickland,

I agree that Sund needs to make some good moves. I think we’re still stuck in a “which came first: the chicken or the egg” scenario. On the one hand, what GOOD, bold moves can we expect to Sund to be ABLE to make? On the other hand, we have Woody saying things like “I have to push the right buttons.”

I don’t think he knows just how right he is. Bold moves or not, the team has to find some consistency. Some insist on keeping the core intact. A nice idea, if we can figure out how to make better use of what we have. If not, then a very bold move is necessary, but does that really change anything besides talent level? Could go on and on about this for days, but you already know the deal. We can’t just make bold moves. We have to make adjustments to what we’re doing now. Involving the frontcourt more (and again, consistently) is a good place to start.

Again, it’s two-fold. Woodson has to employ such a strategy (and not give up on it after 3-5 games), and the frontcourt players have to get their games in gear, or it won’t work.

ILL-logical

June 1st, 2009
8:27 am

Mr. Strickland has hit the nail squarely on the head: Sund is merely a bookmark and the ownership group ,headed by Mr. Gearon, bears the bulk of the responsiblity for the current state of affairs.
All of the speculation, and in some cases another word that describes auto eroticism, on this board often ignores the basic fact that this group obtained the franchise under circumstances that resulted in a legal finding against them; have continously lost money while cutting costs in critical areas such as marketing ,all while maintaing a media (ajc) aided profile of competance.

Are they bad people? Don’t know and don’t care ,but what I do care about is the only ATL pro franchise that has gone to the playoffs 2 consecutive years and promises even better to come, looks to me like as if they are not going to build on that success to reach what my ultimate goal is : a championship!

Astro Joe

June 1st, 2009
9:50 am

“bears the bulk of the responsibility for the current state of affairs”. Did something happen, are we back in the lottery? I know that I vegged out over the weekend, but darn, did I miss the ‘09-10 season? Last I recall, we finished 4th in the regular season and 4th in the playoffs and were one of only 8 teams in the NBA to advance to the second round.

FAMhawk

June 1st, 2009
10:15 am

“I know that I vegged out over the weekend, but darn, did I miss the ‘09-10 season? Last I recall, we finished 4th in the regular season and 4th in the playoffs and were one of only 8 teams in the NBA to advance to the second round”

IS THIS THE SAME GUY WHO SAID EVERYBODY SHOULD ENJOY THIS SEASON AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE THERE WAS NO REASON AT ALL TO BELIEVE THAT THE HAWKS WOULD HAVE AS SUCCESSFUL A SEASON THE NEXT YEAR? WHICH IS IT GOING TO BE. LIVE IN THE PAST OR IGNORE THE FUTURE?

bigdave

June 1st, 2009
10:23 am

“if someone just beat you up, you don’t congratulate them on beating you up; it just don’t make sense”

- Lebron James

O'brien

June 1st, 2009
10:40 am

We have seen Dwight Howard talk about Patrick Ewing and his coaching. Andrew Bynum gets to work with Kareem. I have a hard time seeing Josh and Al giving Tyrone Hill props for working with them.

I hope Woody comes back with a new wrinkle in the offense, because good teams in the league know all there is to know about iso JJ (even iso Lebron didnt work against the Magic). Plus it forces JJ to work too hard. And the best way to do that is to change up the coaching staff. Bring in a guy who knows offense. On that note, I wish we had an assistant coach who had some head coaching experience, but I dont know if that’s something Woody would go for.

Astro Joe

June 1st, 2009
10:59 am

FAMHAWK, live in the now. So until the champion is crowned, the ‘08-’09 season still marches on. And I also said that I don’t blame any business owner for looking at ways to reduce business expenses in this economy. Sorry, if I choose to believe that the same conditions that are affecting General Motors, Wachovia and the seafood restaurant that lasted 15 months after rave reviews in my neighborhood will likewise impact the Highlight Factory. I won’t blame the Hawks ownership group if they’re not recession proof.

Astro Joe

June 1st, 2009
11:10 am

O’brien, Woody works directly with Smith, Horford, Acie, Marvin and each and every player on the team. He doesn’t need no stinkin’ assistants (tongue in cheek remark for some regulars on the blog).

I agree, I wish we had an ex-head coach on the staff, also. Along with a big man coach who actually scored more than 15 points in an NBA game. I was really impressed with Del Negro’s first staff that included Del Harris (who is retiring after 50 years of coaching) and Bickerstaff. I doubt that Woody would ever look to add someone like Paul Westphal or Mo Cheeks, but that sure would be helpful for all involved. And without a doubt, I’d LOVE to see my man Antoine Carr teaching our bigs how to defend the low post AND knock down turn-around jumpers on the block. Even Anonio Davis would be a huge upgrade over Ty Hill.

Melvin

June 1st, 2009
11:12 am

Is Mickael Pietrus who we thought we were getting in Mo Evans? 2/3 guy that could hit the 3 and defend the other team best wing player??? Mo is overrated and I see why the Magic let him go. Sund overpaid for his services by giving him a 3yr contract. That third year should have been a team option. However, I’ll give Mo credit. He’s tough as nails. Now lets bring back the Afro man and get rid of Speedy and Mo (if needed)….

Melvin

June 1st, 2009
11:16 am

Astro,

If we bring in Mo Cheeks, he better have HC as his title…

jhan

June 1st, 2009
11:28 am

Ill wrote – “looks to me like as if they are not going to build on that success to reach what my ultimate goal is : a championship!”

What would you like them to do right now exactly?

No free agent signings allowed until July. No other team would make a trade right now either.

Just asking.

yetta

June 1st, 2009
11:33 am

THIS IS kOBE’S YEAR; NBA DOES NOT WANT A KOBE WIN OVER LEBRON OR VICE VERSA RIGHT NOW. LEBRON IS IN THEIR FUTURE PLANS FOR GREATNESS. IT WAS NOT IN THE CARDS FOR A KOBE/LEBRON IN THE FINALS FOR THIS YEAR. LEBRON WILL HAVE HIS CHANCE IN THE FUTURE. IT’S ALL PLANNED.

Najeh Davenpoop

June 1st, 2009
11:50 am

“Finally, Soloman Jones , with an extra 20 lbs, may be the short term answer to Who is at the 5.”

Solo supposedly added 20 pounds last year, and it got him nowhere. You can be as big as you want, but if you don’t have the mindset to bang inside it’s not going to matter.

On another note, I guess I’m the only person disappointed that the Cavs lost? Maybe I should learn my lesson and give the Magic credit at some point, but… nah. Lakers in 5, as much as I think they don’t deserve to win the title.

Oh yeah, Vitamin Water Marketing Department, did you forget you still have 50 Cent?

Najeh Davenpoop

June 1st, 2009
11:51 am

I don’t have a problem with LeBron not talking to reporters post-game, but it doesn’t take a whole lot of effort to go give Dwight Howard a pound before leaving the floor.

Navid

June 1st, 2009
12:51 pm

I hate UNC more than any other school in the world BUT I wouldn’t mind the hawks taking Tyler Hansborugh with the first pick… Think about it..

C- Tyler
PF- Horford (his natural position)
SF- J. Smith or M. Williams (Personally id give it to Williams bc Smith takes too many shots)
SG- Johnson
PG- Re-sign Bibby

Mike is back

June 1st, 2009
1:29 pm

Najeh, I wouldn’t scoff at Solo like that…he could definitely become a legit shot blocker and rebounder as his game continues to evolve…his situation is very similar to Acie. Neither guy has had enough PT to get an adequate assessment of their overall skills.

Solo is just as young as the rest of these guys on the roster. He will make someone a good role player once he gets some consistent minutes…he has the right attitude…he’s got fire in his belly and he’s willing to put in work to improve his game…someone will give him a chance…same goes for Acie.

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 1st, 2009
1:31 pm

This lebron thing is being blow way out of proportion……. The guy is yung -we all made mistakes at that age-I feel his pain tho, He was playing 1 on 5 the entire season….. on the flip side As the face of the league and arguably the best player , u have to suck it up and do the right thing…. He’ll be okay

Itz funny how some people think Lebron will lose some of his endorsements becuz of this, I thinkz not !!! Two name s for you Kobe Bryant/Ray Lewis………

Danny Ferry better morph into David Blane with the quickness- If they dont get sum peices this summer Yung Jsmes is sure to bolt for greener pastures for sure….

Intresting trade sum one mentioned: Marvin/Josh for Gay/Gasol/#2

Gay is alot better than Marvin, so it breaks down to a Josh for Gasol/Thabeet ……. Bibby,JJ,Gay,Horford,Thabeet

Bench: Flip,Chillz,Gasol,Solo,Toney Douglas,Hunter

Thats the making of sumthing special right thur providing we can find the right jockey to ride these therobredz

I.MUS WRITE- INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY

June 1st, 2009
1:32 pm

I guess the third time is the charm…. Sekou get ur blog together- ” Meal after meal….Jeezuz

Astro Joe

June 1st, 2009
1:38 pm

Najeh, I have a problem with it. I believe that LeBron and Dwight are part of an exclusive club and as such, they should congratulate each other. It was not as if LeBron lost to Andre Iguodala or Joe Johnson or some other non-superstar. This was one of the top 5-6 ballers in the world with whom he just spent most of last summer. No, he didn’t need to seek out Pietrus, Rashard or Hedo. But he most definitely should have at least given Dwight Howard a fist-bump on his way off the floor.

jhan, our GMs (BK and now Sund) seem to get a beaten on these blogs because they don’t announce to the fan base their off-season plans. I’m sure it would be so much better if we pre-announce every transaction like the Braves did with Furcal, Peavy, Burnett and Griffey a few months ago.

Astro Joe

June 1st, 2009
1:40 pm

Najeh, my bad, I read your 11:51 am post incorrectly. I agree with you, okay to blow off reporters, not okay to blow off #12.

Mike is back

June 1st, 2009
2:06 pm

Najeh O Yeah, I’m with the majority that says it was classless for Lebron to duck and run instead OF facing the victors like a man. If HE WERE a true competitor…HE WOULD HAVE acknowledged the effort of his opponent. It hard to believe you would slight a guy that was your teammate when you won a gold medal representing your country in the Olympic …it just don’t sound right…CONGRATULATE the man and move on!!!!!

Now people can stop with all the silly comparison to MJ. I love watching Lebron play…he is a phenomenal athlete…but there is always a danger when you receive too much too soon. Until he earns a couple rings…people need to let Lebron be Lebron…and quit blowing so much sunshine up his asssssss!!!!

Having said…TO HIS CREDIT…LBJ did all one person could humanly do to get the Cavs to the finals…that’s what disappointing the most…the fact that all that effort and energy was tarnished by his lack of professionalism and maturity.

NOW CAN MY HOME BOY JOSH GET SOME LOVE…AT LEASE HE DIDN’T DUCK AND RUN!!!!heh heh

Volman

June 1st, 2009
2:40 pm

Could the Hawks have won a game or two against the Cavs if they weren’t looking to get LeBron’s autograph?

Just playing, but looking back at this Magic series…I saw something that I did not see in the Pistons or Hawks series:

The Cavs’ roleplayers were a nonentity. Against the Hawks Wally was flying around taking charges and hitting three’s… Delonte West was posting up Bibby as well as knocking down big threes and Mo Williams was hitting from outside (at will)… Don’t forget big Z… he had his way with the Hawks’ frontcourt.

We all know now that the Magic are a better TEAM than the Hawks, but does ANYBODY think the Cavs ran out of gas or hit a cold streak? They were confident and ON FIRE against the Pistons and Hawks, but seemed to not be the same team against Orlando. I am SURE the Hawks would have liked to see some poor shooting performances from West, Big Z, and guys like Williams and Wally.

Look at Big Z’s stats from game 6…pretty terrible if you ask me.

I don’t know..just thinking!

Mike is back

June 1st, 2009
2:41 pm

Najeh, ditto for me too on the comment about LBJ. However, when you are the face of the NBA…you have to be man enough to take the bad with the good. It wouldn’t have hurt to say a couple of words to the media either.

G-Man

June 1st, 2009
2:56 pm

Navid,

What would make you think that Tyler Hansbrough could play the center position? Although the draft combine measurements showed that Tyler Hansbrough is the same size as Blake Giffin, we are already undersized at the center position, and Tyler Hansbrough doesn’t have great athleticism. I would take Al Horford at the five any day over Tyler Hansbrough. By the way, I heard that Samuel Dalembert is demanding to be traded. How does this lineup look:

C-Samuel Dalembert
PF-Al Horford
SF-Josh Smith(in hopes he develops a shot)
SG-Joe Johnson
PG-Mike Bibby

C-Solo
PF-Charlie Villanueva
SF-Marvin
SG-Flip
PG-Acie(or whatever pg we draft

terrell barron

June 1st, 2009
3:11 pm

1.Trade Mo and Randolph Morris for a box of chocolates.
2.Let Zaza walk,
3.Sign Bibby, Flip, Sheed, and Ariza to 2 yr deals.
Starters: Bibby/JJ/Ariza/Smith/Sheed
Bench: Acie/Flip/Marvin/Horford/Solo
Might as well make a run for the title.

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
3:19 pm

O’brien,

Agreed. We need new wrinkles in the offense. As for hiring someone to come in and work with our bigs….I’ll refer to Sund, who had an interesting reply when asked if he thought they should employ an “offensive coordinator” on the coaching staff. Sund said that sort of thing was up to Woody. Hmmmmmm.

Astro Joe,

I see Sund getting ripped for announcing the resigning of both Joshes as the top priority last year, then not getting it done. We can argue and speculate the hell out of how one signing got done, and the other didn’t, and I’d really rather not. But I don’t recall him being ripped for not saying what he’s going to do.

On top of that, he hasn’t given your boy Woody an extension yet. Strange, THAT got to print, didn’t it?

And don’t forget that Sund said that any hiring of anybody on the coaching staff is up to the head coach. Either he’s throwing your boy under the bus, or he’s simply laying out the way he thinks things should work. Either way, it took a long time to get Mark Price in here, and we still have no big man coach. Of course, Billy Knight was here longer than Sund has been, and maybe HE didn’t allow the signing of such a person. Who knows.

I think that’s an interesting pile of facts, speculation, and quotes. But I’m sure none of it is in any way related…

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
3:19 pm

Terrell Barron,

Who gets to eat the chocolates?

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
3:25 pm

Volman,

We don’t have role players, because we don’t even have guys who know their roles. Draw your own conclusions on that one.

But role players who KNOW and PLAY their roles is the difference between a decent team and a very good team. And when it comes to the playoffs, how one coach/team is able to pit it’s role players against those of the opposing team is often the difference in the game. You said it yourself, against us and the Pistons, the Cavs’ role players were rather effective. Against the Magic, they struggled immensely.

Even though he scored more, was Lebron more effective for the Cavs in this series than Dwight was for the Magic? Whose role players stepped up higher/better? Was it that the Magic had better role players? Did Van Gundy get more out of or more properly utilize his “supporting cast” than Brown did?

Or….you could just oversimplify it and say that all teams have warts, and the Magic just had less warts than the Cavs did.

Heh.

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
3:28 pm

Mike Is Back,

It’s funny, isn’t it? Some people were ready to hand over everything to Lebron and swear off all NBA championships until he’s no longer in his prime. Gosh, I guess now teams will have to realize that he can’t beat them all by himself, and that there IS a chance to win against the Cavs.

Gosh darn it! Now settling for just making the playoffs for the next few years is suddenly not such a good alibi (for not trying to be better) after all!

Astro Joe

June 1st, 2009
3:33 pm

Ty Hill is the big man coach, right? (Did I miss something?) Price is a consultant, I never quite understood the difference. Maybe the GM hires the consultants? See jhan’s 11:28 post for context of my comments about the silence from the executive offices (this year not during the Josh stuff). And you may recall, someone got all excited about the Milwaukee GM’s statements. Maybe I’m the only who is reading the posts on here asking for more transparency from Sund prior to draft day.

Woody’s extension (or not) was bound to get to print. With regard to the head coach, those decisions are not time-bound by NBA rules. So the only question that could have been answered immediately following the Cavs series was regarding the status of Woody. And if memory serves me, it was Woody who disclosed the “non-extension” story.

Personally, I want my GM to be quiet. I also recall BK being ripped for announcing the Shelden “promise” several qweeks before the draft. Even before dude played 1 game and disclosed his “bustness”, folk were ticked off that he pre-announced and weakened any possible trade considerations. I love the rumor mill and love to read that stuff. But I prefer to read about other teams. I want my GM to keep his plans on the low-low.

G-Man

June 1st, 2009
3:38 pm

How would yall feel about trading up to snag Johnny Flynn? There is something about his winning attitude, speed, power, and leadership abilities that I think would greatly improve our team.

O'brien

June 1st, 2009
4:23 pm

We also have a starter that does not play his role consistently enough. I’m talking about Josh. His role is to stay on the low block and operate inside. Another role is to give up the ball to the PG on the break. Why is it so hard for him to play within his limits?

Mo Evans was supposed to be our defensive stopper off the bench (like Pietrus), but he did not do so well. And our switching defense has not been effective against good teams. Can somebody explain why Woody insists on playing a switching defense?

Speaking of Woody, I hope he learned something from the Magic. Play inside out sometimes. I think if Josh/Al got more touches in the post, they would be more effective, and they would get easy shots for Bibby and JJ on the perimeter.

RealSquawk

June 1st, 2009
5:03 pm

BIG RAY,

WELL SAID SIR, WELL WELL SAID!!

Mike is back

June 1st, 2009
5:26 pm

Big Ray, I think Koby would agree too. It was obvious all the chatter about Lebron was starting to agitate him a little. In fairness to Lebron…MJ couldn’t do by himself either…LBJ will be okay…Ferry is probably the one not getting much sleep.lol!!!

And Yeah, I seen you slide in a shameless plug for Woody and Sund with your reference to MAKING THE PLAYOFF!!!!

I GUESS Woody can take some solace in the fact that Mike Brown had the best record in the NBA and won COY running that same type of Iso offense…however, given the outcome of the Eastern Conference Final…If was Woody…I wouldn’t brake my arm trying to pat myself on the back. Heh heh.

Ken Strickland

June 1st, 2009
5:51 pm

A lot of people criticized JHoward for calling out his HC for allowing the players controlling the ball to consistently shoot jumpshots instead of taking advantage of their strength and going inside. Well, it worked, because the Magic defeated the Cavaliers because they did a much better job of using their strengths to exploit their weaknesses.

THAT’S THE MAIN COMPLAINT I’VE HAD WITH WOODSON. HE’S STUBBORNLY REFUSED TO CONSISTENTLY USE OUR STRENGTHS(speed, quickness, youth, stamina, athleticism) TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE OPPOSITIONS WEAKNESSES. When we encounter a team or teams that can match our speed. quickness and athleticism, they almost certainly can’t matchup to us physically. That’s when we should take advantage of our size and strength and pound them inside. If they can match of exceed our size and strength, they almost certainly can’t matchup to our speed, quickness and/or athleticism.

WW HAVE GOT TO STOP WITH THIS OLD SCHOOL MENTALITY. We are no longer in the era of the old Celtics, Lakers, Knicks, 76ers etc, where you can just run 6 or 7 players out and ignore your bench, or limit your rotation during the regular season and the playoffs.

Our last draft was the 1st one in which the Hawks have not been in the lottery since Woodson’s been the HC. If MWilliams, ALaw, SJones and AHorford aren’t resigned to extensions, JSmith could conceivably end up as the only draft pick we’ll have left to show for all of those yrs of frutility.

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
6:02 pm

Yeah, Ty Hill is the big man coach. Wow, what a job he’s done with our bigs, eh?

Oh wait. I forgot. They didn’t play with energy, and probably ignored all the great advice he gave them.

I thought Price was a “shooting coach” when certain people were conveniently ripping him for players not hitting their free throws (uh, like Josh Smith). Hmmm, I guess the title is a matter of convenience…

Yep, it was Woody who disclosed the “non-extension” comments. The same Woody who admantly declares that he is NOT worried about his job status, while some people adamantly proclaim that he is coaching scared, without job security.

I wonder, is Woody a liar, or has evolution allowed some people to develop vocal chords in their anal regions? I’ve heard of stranger things…

I could give a rat’s butt if Sund makes his plans known or not, as long as they are good plans that he is able to deliver on.

I seem to recall saying that I appreciate Sund’s clever evasiveness in not revealing much during the Q&A with Mark Bradley. Hell, I ardently defended it, and compared it to the open frankness of Milwaukee GM John Hammond. Spent several paragraphs on it. Guess that got missed (tongue FIRMLY in cheek)…

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
6:14 pm

RealSquawk,

Thank you, sir!

O’brien,

I guess there’s two schools of thought on Josh not playing his role.

One is that Josh has trouble focusing on what he’s supposed to be doing. His role is not clearly defined at all times. He’s not as mature as he should be (ok, an understatement). He has not worked on the parts of his game that he should be working on (his own fault), but also does not get the ball where he should be getting it, often enough. He relies too much on his athleticism, and tries to push things too often, just to make something happen. Two things: he provides much of what some seem to think is all that is necessary to win (energy)….and I seem to recall a certain point guard telling a certain head coach that if he didn’t want him shooting jumpers from that far out, maybe he should run the play with him in a different spot.

Of course, if you adhere to the second school of thought (i.e., you’re practice giving mouth to arse with a life-size Woody doll), then you’re probably tired of me repeating that one incident (despite the fact that it is indicative of what has been happening for quite some time).

Yep. Now let’s wait for the straw…I mean sand…to start flying…

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
6:15 pm

Mike,

MJ had to learn that he couldn’t do it by himself. Lebron has to learn the same, but he also has to get the necessary support to get the job done.

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
6:25 pm

O’brien,

On the flip side of that coin, you really have to decide at some point if Josh fits here, or if there is a better fit. He’s got tons of potential STILL, but can he realize it? The only thing we really don’t want to do is send somebody like that packing, and become a WORSE team, not a better one, especially over the long run.

If it can be done (i.e., get a better fit for the team and get better in the process), then do it. If not, then re-define roles, get some more effective leadership in here, and work with it the best you can.

And you do that no matter who the coach is. Because getting better is the way to go, right?

I mean, holding serve is fine. Getting to the playoffs and staying roughly the same level for the next 5-8 years is all well and good. But it makes your coach look bad. He’d become a “historical postseason failure.” You know….like Avery Johnson, and guys like that….

Fitz15

June 1st, 2009
6:35 pm

Hawks need to deal J Smith and try to get Camby and Al Thorton the Hawks might have to throw in a player or pick but remember the Clips where hot after Smith last season. He would give the clips a nice young frontline with Griffin in the Draft. Then let Bibby walk and go after Andre Miller a solid PG who drives and dishes not a 30 ft jump shooter. Villenueva would be a nice add on as well. Sign Flip and Zaza and cross your fingers Lawson falls to you at 19 and he can learn from Miller.

Ca$h

June 1st, 2009
6:55 pm

Ken Strickland… every time someone criticizes Ordinary Joe they say he a is a three time all star (so what have that done 4 the hawks o yea last allstar game he had 0 points that wat u call a allstar lol)he is 2-for-18 in playoffs, But this is business and these are the facts: Joe has one year left on his contract. He just completed another sorry post-season,In last year’s playoffs, he went 1-for-7 against Boston. This is not what you want from a guy who’s supposed to be your best player, It’s certainly not what you want from a player who should be your leader but seldom acts like one. Or acts like he wants to be one. Joe the joke is one of those quiet guys who just wants to do his thing, whatever his thing is. But that’s not good enough here. 2 b the best you got 2 show it 4 example like Dwight Howard.. do the best thing and trade joe and Marvin Williams. give Josh time he get there plus he show that energy we need..

Melvin

June 1st, 2009
7:01 pm

“The Cavs supposedly will go hard for Shaq as they did in February. Is Shaq the answer to deal with the quicker Howard? There’s been the LeBron to New York stuff (James wore a Yankees hat Sunday when he finally talked to media) and lately LeBron paired with Yao, who can become a free agent after next season, because of that Chinese investor in the Cavs. Though any such benefit James would derive that way should be against the salary cap rules. I’ve heard James has been recruiting Joe Johnson for 2010. We’ll hear all kind of stuff.” – Bulls.com

Hmmm, looks like the King has summon Joe to be his Prince…

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
7:01 pm

Ken your right i agree with you on every thing you said.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
7:14 pm

Looking at the cavs and magic series its so obvious that you have to have a 1,2 punch like batman and robin the cavs have batman but no robin thats why i say evaluating the hawks we dont even have a batman so in what way can we make it to the championship first we dont need just any one we have to have a star player like a chris bosh who will a leader of the team and fit well with josh and joe.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

June 1st, 2009
7:23 pm

Chris Bosh can’t even led his current team into the playoffs. So why do so many believe he would be the savior for the Hawks????????

O'brien

June 1st, 2009
7:42 pm

Melvin, Chris Bosh needs an allstar in the backcourt to take some pressure off. JJ in the backcourt and Bosh in the frontcourt would be much more effective, because Bosh is a lot more consistent than Josh.

Ray, my feeling on Josh is that as long as Woody is the coach, they will not be on the same page, and Josh will not maximize his potential (unless we get a guard like CP3, who really helped Tyson Chandler’s offense).

Speaking of Josh and Bosh, Toronto is be worried about losing Bosh next year when his contract is up. Keeping in mind that he played at GATech, would you trade Josh, Mo’ Evans and the 19th pick, (or Josh and whoever makes the deal works) for Bosh (if Toronto is willing). Yes, I know the Hawks would have to be convinced they could sign him to a long term deal, but would you make that trade?

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
7:57 pm

o brien you are right but my thing is why not trade horford instead of josh?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
8:03 pm

Horford is a beast on the board we no that but i think josh bring more to the table if josh work on his boxing out and learning how to position him self on the boards and play more above the rim and stop posting up at the 3point line this guy could be something special but will josh ever reach that potential i think so.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
8:10 pm

Marvin Horford and the 19pick for Bosh Raptors will take that deal knowing that Bosh will be gone in 2010.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

G-Man

June 1st, 2009
8:13 pm

Melvin,

Eventhough Chris Bosh hasn’t led his team to the playoffs, he still would be a fantastic option for the hawks. By the way, Kevin Garnett was a superstar on the Minnesota Timberwolves, but he didn’t win a championship until he was a celtic.

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
8:21 pm

LET BIBBY go thats 15million and let ACIE starte at point thats 2million you have cut 13million on the cap so making the trade for bosh 14million want hurt at all.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

G-Man

June 1st, 2009
8:32 pm

Sorry, I found out Chris Bosh had led his team into the playoffs in 2007. My bad.

niremetal

June 1st, 2009
8:45 pm

Horford over Smoove. Every day.

O'brien

June 1st, 2009
8:49 pm

Repost from page 6.

Toronto is worried about losing Bosh next year when his contract is up. Keeping in mind that he played at GaTech, and the Hawks have made the playoffs the last 2 years, would you trade Josh, Mo’ Evans and the 19th pick, (or Josh and the right to Chills, or Josh and whoever makes the deal work) for Bosh (if Toronto is willing). Yes, I know the Hawks would have to be convinced they could sign him to a long term deal, but would you make that trade?

Let me know what you guys think. I would make the deal. Bosh is still only 25, and he averages 73 games per season, and his offensive game is already established. We dont know when (or if) Josh would realize his potential, especially if Woody is here. As long as we dont have to give up an Arm and a leg…I say get Bosh, if we feel we can sign him to an extension (him and JJ).

darrell starks

June 1st, 2009
9:01 pm

Lets say chill dont want to come back make a strong push for trevor ariza for about 5year 35million thats 7million a year
starters ACIE, JOE, TREVOR, JOSH, BOSH, or if chill do come back
starters ACIE, JOE, CHILL, JOSH, BOSH.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Melvin

June 1st, 2009
9:29 pm

Good point G-Man but I wouldn’t put Bosh in KG class. He’s a good player but I don’t think he’s as nearly the defensive player KG is…

Nire,
Josh over Horford….

I think this team has alot of talent and I worry that this team will be broken up before we have a chance to see what a better coaching staff can do with this group….

Ken Strickland

June 1st, 2009
9:42 pm

CA$H-it’s obvious you have a thing against JJ because you’ve overlooked a lot trying to make your case. Players don’t become Allstars based on how many pts they score or how well they play in the Allstar gm. Under Woodson, JJ had finished 1st or 2nd in mins played. In addition to the playing heavy mins, he’s had to defend the players PG MBibby should be defending, which is very often the quickest and/or fastest player on their team. JJ is one of the best open jumpshooters in the NBA with as much range as anybody. However, he’s forced to operate within a limited OFF system that forces him far too often into one on one isolations, which isn’t his strong suit, and allows him to be consistently double teamed.

The players and coaches that selected him to represent the USA, and the Eastern conference as an Allstar, recognized these disadvantages and rewarded his ability to produce in spite of them. You’ve chosen to ignore the opinion of his peers and coaches and singled out an individual performance to try and justify your negative opinion of him. I remember a playoff gm against Boston last yr when he almost single handedly destroyed them and they couldn’t stop him. I also remember PG MBibby having an awful series last yr, but you don’t see that as an issue.

If some intelligence and sanity aren’t introduced to this organization, after this season ends, JSmith could be the only returning player thats ever been on this roster the last 6yrs. THAT’S CERTAINLY NOT THE WAY TO GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL. IF ANYTHING, IT’S A WAY OF RETURNING TO THE LEVELS OF THE NOT SO DISTANT PAST.

doc

June 1st, 2009
10:17 pm

man i am missing basketball already, all i can even come close to finding interesting is wayne dyer on gpb. went to the baseball game and those announcers were pitiful and to watch two straight innings of pitchers walking the bases loaded was too much.

Big Ray

June 1st, 2009
10:44 pm

O’brien,

I can’t lie. I’d be all over that like stank on dooky. Gimme Bosh any day in that trade.

G-Man

June 1st, 2009
11:08 pm

Who do yall truly believe the hawks will select in the draft? I have heard Marcus Thornton and Terance Williams and I am not satisfied at all with these choices.

Ca$h

June 1st, 2009
11:33 pm

Ken Strickland … Bottom line I give J credit he is a good player just not a team player he is not what Atl needs…..aganist other great players he is an avg player we need a team player someone who can make the rest of the team. So Ken I say again trade J if not he needs to step up his game to include the other 4 players on court…..

Truth-serum

June 1st, 2009
11:45 pm

Ca$h

June 1st, 2009
11:33 pm

You must look past Ken Strickland. His hatred of Woodson and his lack of understanding of basketball doesnt allow him to make any meaniful or insightful expose’. He perfers to talk with his intent than with knowledge.

You would be better served to just ignore him as most people do especially when he slanders Woody.

Shout out the Zaza the continuous turnover Pachulia.

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
1:43 am

All the Hawks seem to play selfishly. But I think that that’s a result of Woodson’s allergic-to-ball-movement offensive system. Makes no sense to single out any one player for it.

Oh, I’m sorry Truth-serum. Was that slander?

Clyde

June 2nd, 2009
7:22 am

Hey Sekou!! You haven’t gave out the end of the season blog awards yet. Ken Strickland is still my favorite to win Blogger of The Year.

Lets trade Joe while we can. Just like Bradley said in his article we need a superstar. Joe is just a star making superstar money.

Ca$h

June 2nd, 2009
8:34 am

I agree with Clyde….

jhan

June 2nd, 2009
8:56 am

Truth – can you please explain again the current salary cap situation the Hawks are in & just how much free money is available? You were such the expert on Bradley’s blog that I think the folks here would enjoy your accumen.

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
10:30 am

Darrell,

For one, the salaries don’t match up. Relatedly, Horford’s contract pays him $4.3M next year and just $5.3M the year after that. That’s less than half of what Smoove makes. Regardless of your view on which is better, you have to admit that you get WAY more bang for your buck with Horford.

Beyond that, Bosh is not a good on-ball post defender, so I’d rather have Horford (who is a good on-ball post defender) than Smoove (who is mediocre at best on-ball…his forte is help defense, which is also Bosh’s forte). Lastly, Horford doesn’t take plays off or make stupid decisions nearly as much as Smoove does. He’s a player who understands the limits of his game, plays within them, and thus consistently helps his team win. Smoove still has no conception of the limits of his game. That’s not entirely his fault (Woody takes a LOT of the blame for that), but it is what it is.

With all those things combined (plus a few more that I could mention but won’t), I would much rather see us trade Smoove than Horford, ESPECIALLY if the player we were getting back was Bosh.

Clyde

June 2nd, 2009
10:38 am

Beyond that, Bosh is not a good on-ball post defender, so I’d rather have Horford (who is a good on-ball post defender)……

Ha Ha Ha Fire Woody

kwooden1

June 2nd, 2009
10:41 am

Looking at the HAWKS overall stats for last year and then adding in the fact that they had a lot of injuries during the Playoffs the team as it’s constructed isn’t terrible, it’s actually pretty good. Acie looked pretty productive when he was in the regular rotation and health. The overall rebounding wasn’t that bad when Horford was health. The differentials look OK, they’re about -2 rebound/per and -2 attempts/per against their opponents. A more active Smoove on the boards probably solves both issues. Many of us said that a health HAWKS team matches up pretty well with Orlando and they’ve played well overall against all the elite teams.

Looking at the RFA and FA this summer, I think some Sign & Trades of bench players would really help this team. Using the mid-level exception to get a player like Marquis Daniels, Linas Klieza, Gerald Green, etc to get some more scoring of the bench. Along with a move to get someone like David Lee, Brandon Bass, etc to get better rebounding. The HAWKS could also draft Mullen or Tyler Hansbrough to help with the rebounding off the bench. Because of the way ASG spends money my realistic lineup for now is:

PG – Bibby
SG – Johnson
SF – Williams
PF – Smith
C – Horford

PG – Law
SG – Murray
SF – Klieza/Daniels/Wilkens
PF – Bass/Hansbrough/S. Jones
C – S. Jones/Mullen

I hate to trade Evans or let go Zaza, but the HAWKS can use more scoring and shot blocking off the bench. Solo looks like a good options at either PF or C. Hopefully JSmoove will really learn from his experience against Lebron and work on his jump shot and handles. If Marvin takes another step forward it would be a real help to the team, especially to take pressure off of JJ. Hopefully Woodson was watching what Orlando was doing against Clev. in terms of tempo. Our other problem against Clev was rebounding, but again if JSmoove can be more active I think that will solve it. (along with a health Horford)

GO HAWKS!!!

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
11:08 am

Yeah, Clyde. You’re right. All the scouts and people who actually watch our games must be wrong. Horford sucks on D. Josh and Sean Williams rule the world. If only we had drafted Sean Williams, we would have stopped LeBron. Horford is such a bum.

Melvin

June 2nd, 2009
11:19 am

Nire,

Is there a cut date when teams have to render a qualifying offer to their RFA (like Marvin and Childress)???

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
11:23 am

Mel,

The deadline for extending a qualifying offer is June 30. We can start negotiating with players on July 1, but we can’t sign anyone until after the NBA salary cap is announced on July 7.

JD

June 2nd, 2009
11:28 am

CV and TD would be a great fits for the Hawks.

Regarding Ariza, I just can’t believe that George Karl didn’t have better out of bounds plays. Either they were poorly designed plays (ariza knew exactly where the ball was going) or the players didn’t cut aggressively to the inbounder. What a way to lose two games! There should be greater accountability here. Karl makes too much money to let that happen.

Melvin

June 2nd, 2009
11:39 am

Nire,

Thanks. I was thinking that we could signed FA’s prior to making the qualifying offers. Oh well, there’s no loop hole for doing that…

Dave

June 2nd, 2009
11:59 am

Josh for Bosh is perfect but another key is signing Gortat from Orlando! Do not resign Bibby and use the #19 and sign and trade Marvin for a developing young point or resign Marvin. Let Zaza go too. Resign Jones amd Flip. Rotation Bosh, Horford, Gortat and Jones at 4 and 5. Bosh, Marvin and Joe at 3. Flip, and Joe at 2. Finally, new pg and Mo at 1 and maybe Speedy if anyone has seen him or Acie if he can get off the bench. Starters Bosh, Horford, Marvin, Joe, and new pg. Nice offense with good defense and a lot of length with Gortat available for bulk on defense and offense! Can extend Bosh with Bibby’s money and sign Gortat with savings from Zaza. Wild card is resigning Childress and that would eliminate need for Marvin!

darrell starks

June 2nd, 2009
12:10 pm

Nire who has more potential JOSH OR HORFORD?
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

Ken Strickland

June 2nd, 2009
12:34 pm

CA$H-you still can’t see the forest for the trees. Nobody considered JJ a aelfish none team player when he was playing with Phoenix. If you consider JJ selfish, then KBryant must be off the chain. Kobe averaged fewer mins than JJ, who led the NBA in mins played, again(36-39.5), took more shots(1712-1420) and had fewer assists(4.7-5.8).

JJ is only doing what his HC requires him to do and the limited OFF system he plays under forces him to do. He plays next to a PG that plays little DEF and is a one dimensional long range jumpshooter. Marvin Williams is the only other starter that can consistently score from the outside, so it’s routine for teams to double and triple team JJ.

Kobe, on the other hand, has far more help. He has 2 BIGS that are bigger/taller than the tallest player on our roster. He can go inside with PGasol, who can also score from outside and ABynum. He has outside help with Ariza and Fisher. Kobe also plays within an OFF system, the triangle OFF, that maximizes the talents of it’s players and has produced more championships than any other system over the last couple of decades. I’ll bet you if Kobe had to play under Woodson’s system, he’d be pulling the DHoward and the LJames, and begging for Shaq.

Your argument isn’t with me. Your argument and opposition to JJ is with the players and coaches that’s taken into consideration what he’s had to deal with and voted him to the USA team and the Eastern Allstar team multiple times. BUT THEN AGAIN, FOOLS LIKE YOUR NEW ADMIRER, TRUTH SEMEN, OOPS, TRUTH SIRUM, SAY I DON’T KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT AND THAT I’M BLINDED BY MY SO CALLED HATRED OF WOODSON. WELL, AS BLOG REGULAR CLYDE WAS ONE OF THE 1ST, IF NOT THE 1ST TO SEE THE PROBLEMS WOODSON WAS CREATING. AND AS HE CAN ATTEST, I WAS ONCE AN AVID WOODSON SUPPORTER AND REGULARLY HAD WORDS WITH CLYDE UNTIL I STARTED SEEING THE LIGHT THAT CLYDE HAD ALREADY TURNED ON. SO, IT’S NOT A HATRED FOR WOODSON THAT FUELS MY DISSATISFACTION WITH HIS COACHING, IT’S THE FACT HIS APPROACH TO COACHING, TACTICS, LACK OF OFTEN NEEDED STRATEGY, HIS UNWILLINGNESS TO COMMIT THE TIME, EFFORT AND ENERGY TO DEVELOPING YOUNG TALENT, AND A BENCH, HIS HEAVY HANDED WAY OF DEALING WITH YOUNG PLAYERS, IS WHAT MADE ME REALIZE HE’S NOT GOOD FOR THE HAWKS.

Everytime the Hawks fall short, because they were unable to overcome the liabilities of their HC and his flawed OFF/DEF systems, people start blowing up the blogs demanding we get rid of and/or acquire this player and that player. Why would anyone think other players will automatically flourish better having to deal with our overall management problems? I’m not placing the overall problems of the team squarely on HC MWoodson’s shoulders. The SAASG is the MAJOR contributor because its flawed decision making caused the resignation of former GM BKnight, the hiring of current GM Sund and thus the rehiring of Woodson.

However, if Woodson wasn’t so inflexible, closedminded and rooted in the coaching ideals of the past, had more confidence, ability and experience and understood the importance of developing, nurturing and utilizing the young talent given to him, this team could have overcome those ownership issues and done much much better, especially over the last 2yrs. And players who’s contracts are expiring or about to expire would be looking for ways to resign rather than looking for the 1st chance to get the hell our of here. BUT ACCORDING TO SOME, WHE ARE MUCH DUMBER THAN ME, I DON’T KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT.

A SHOUTOUT TO CLYDE FOR OPENING MY EYES ABOUT WOODSON WIDE.

detrain

June 2nd, 2009
12:43 pm

What if Sund;

First, Joe / 19 pick should be traded to New York for David Lee / Q Rich / 8th pick. Use the 8th pick to select Johnny Flynn. Next, trade Acie to Minn. for Brewer. Resign Bibby if not possible sign Iverson / Mabury. Salary should be avaliable to sign Wilcox/Brandon Bass or Charlie V and Flip Murry / Marvin Williams. Sign David Lee to a long term deal.

This remade lineup will be fast pace with experience, improved rebounding and defence.

PG: Flynn, Bibby, Murry
SG: Q Rich, Bibby, Brewer, Murry
SF: Marvin, Evans
PF: Josh S., Charlie V. or Wilcox or Brandon Bass
Center: Harfort, David Lee

That team is deep and will win. Thoughts?

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
12:47 pm

Darrell,

Potential for what? “Potential” doesn’t mean anything in isolation. Potential to be a better individual player? Potential to be a key piece in a title-contending team? What?

darrell starks

June 2nd, 2009
12:47 pm

To me this year Horford was a big disappointment after his rookie year i didnt see and a improvement his game stayed the same.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

darrell starks

June 2nd, 2009
12:53 pm

There are a lot of player built on the same style as a horford big and strong but you have to bring more to the table than just being big and strong why every one allways pointing the finger at josh the other players have to step up to the plate and show me something 2.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!

G-Man

June 2nd, 2009
1:08 pm

detrain,

I am a fan of Johnny Flynn like everyone else, but trading Joe for David Lee and a declining Quentin Richardson is just asinine.

darrell starks

June 2nd, 2009
1:25 pm

And far as the trade you can make that deal.
BIBBY 8MILL, JOE 14MILL, MARVIN 8MILL, JOSH 10MILL, HORFORD 4MILL, THATS 44MILLION.
ACIE 2MILL, JOE 14MILL, CHILL 7MILL, JOSH 10MILL, BOSH 14MILL,
THATS 47MILLION.
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!

Wink from Lithonia

June 2nd, 2009
1:44 pm

Hawks as constructed have some nice pieces. I am not saying these are the exact players ( due to age or availabilty per contract),but players like them. I would take them if available, however: Big Z and Varejo from Cleveland and draft Ty Lawson from Carolina. Bring Josh Childress back.

These players would give us size, rebounding, a young point guard to star potential. Varejo would add agressiveness, a low post option on occasion. Big Z would give us a big man in the middle, rebounding, good passer, a nice mid range jumper. Lawson is the only one of the 3 that would develop to star potential, Varejo wants to get paid what he’s worth, does not require a lot of touches and will get his off the board. Big Z will demand some attention in the paint, take the shot or kick to wing or cutter as he is a good passer. Childress would provide defensive size & hustle points, a more expensive version of Mario West.

PG – Ty Lawson (If can win job in camp)
SG – Joe Johnson
SF – Josh Smith / Marvin Williams?
PF – Al Horford
C – Big Z

PG – AC Law / Mike Bibby? (If we can resign Bibby, not then Law)
SG – Flip Murray
SF – Josh Smith / Marvin Williams?
PF – Anderson Varejo
C – ZaZa Pachulia / Solomon Jones

Bench Defense: Forwards = Josh Childress & Guards = Mario West

Now if we could work out the money & contracts for these players we would have a very good team.

dap01

June 2nd, 2009
1:54 pm

Go Ken Strickland, I agree!

Hoops

June 2nd, 2009
2:23 pm

The Draft comes first! Will the Hawks sit still and do nothing or will they try to move up? Why not try to move up and get a player that will make the team and contribute?
The Hawks should propose this trade-Acie, Evans, & #19 pick to the Kings for the #4 pick. We will get either Rubio, Thabeet, or Curry. Either way, we get a potential starter out of the deal.

bigdave

June 2nd, 2009
2:42 pm

Ken Strickland co-sign all the above… been saying the same thing about Woodson and his X’s & O’s all year…

cp

June 2nd, 2009
3:06 pm

I saw this on hoopshype. I don’t know how to link so I will just copy and past it..

The Hawks and Marcus Thornton?: Don’t overlook LSU’s Marcus Thornton. Marcus has had some stellar workout recently going 20-for-25 from NBA three in Dallas and knocked the socks off the Atlanta Hawks before heading to Chicago for the NBA Pre-Draft Combine. Marcus continues to climb as teams get an up-close look at him and are raving his ability to score the ball. Marcus is a “play right away” player and seems to be making things interesting especially in the 13 to 20 range. Hawks sources agreed that Marcus was exceptional in their workout and consider him a Joe Johnson type scorer. With Johnson expected to explore his free agent options next summer the Hawks may have found their man at #19.

Samuel

June 2nd, 2009
3:48 pm

O'brien

June 2nd, 2009
4:08 pm

darrell starks:

I agree that I expected more from Horford this year as well. But some reasons why he didnt show as much improvement is because he doesnt get many plays run for him. JJ alone took as many shots as Josh and Al combined. Not to mention Bibby. If the Hawks played through their frontcourt more, Horford and Josh would have better numbers.

cp:

I would be surprised if Joe explores his free agency options next summer. Thats my opinion, but he wanted to come play for the Hawks, and he gave Woody a ringing endorsement last year, he made the all star team 3 times, the Hawks made the playoffs twice. I think as long as Sund shows him that the Hawks will continue to be competitive, and we make him a fair offer, I think JJ will stick around.

However, how ironic would it be if JJ signed with another team, since he is part of the reason why we are locked in this ownership battle.

Sekou, can we get a new blog up?

Ariose

June 2nd, 2009
4:09 pm

They Write that lol, but hoopsworld now has us taking Gerald Henderson in thier Mock Dracft 3.0 update.

Ariose

June 2nd, 2009
4:13 pm

Acie is potentially better than all of these upcoming rookie guards anyway…..Remember the game where he gave CP3 fits?

I think Sund Might go Traditional on us and not re-sign flip, and get another SF and SG in here to back up the starters……and either sign ‘Sheed or trade for a Clipper center…

Clyde

June 2nd, 2009
6:09 pm

Where was Horford when DWade and Lebron James were driving to the basket? He was doing the Cupid Shuffle and sliding to the left so the can have a easy layup.

bushwacker

June 2nd, 2009
6:18 pm

Rollplayers????
The hell with that, trade J Smith and Joe Johnson to Cleveland for LeBron!!

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
6:21 pm

Wow. 4 things.

1) If you look at my original post, I talked about ON BALL POST DEFENSE. Last I checked, LeBron and D-Wade were never stupid enough to try and back Horford down. But even that being said…

2) He had a sprained ankle, fool.

3) Where was your boy Josh, who WAS fully healthy, when DWade and LeBron were guarding the basket?

4) Do you really, honestly think that Sean Williams or Joakim Noah would have even slowed them down? Hell, do you think any center not named Dwight or Tim or MAYBE Yao would have done much to slow them down? Hell, LeBron averaged 38 points per game against Dwight. You’re talking about 2 of the 3 best players off the drive in the NBA. If Dwight Howard, All-Defensive First Team center couldn’t slow LeBron down, does it really make much sense to criticize Horford for not being able to do it WITH A SPRAINED ANKLE?

And, once again, you laughed at me for saying that Horford was a better ON BALL post defender than Josh. I’d really love to see you try to argue the contrary. Seriously. It wouldn’t be quite as funny as seeing you make a fool out of yourself by saying he should have taken Noah or Sean Williams, but it would be close.

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
6:23 pm

* “driving to the basket,” not “guarding the basket”
** “saying we should have taken Noah,” not “he”

Ca$h

June 2nd, 2009
6:25 pm

Ken Strickland ……….Frist of all if u noe basetball U CAN’T COMPARE kOBE BRYANT a NBA Slam Dunk Contest champion,9-time All-Defensive selection,11-time All-NBA selection,3-time NBA All-Star Game MVP:2-time scoring champion plus all those field goals attempted Kobe had he lead the NBA regular season field goals made.. unlike the Average Joe… u can’t bring up joe joke name around Kobe plus kobe make everyone better on the court.. who is joe johnson??

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
6:29 pm

Clyde

June 2nd, 2009
6:43 pm

Dwade (a small guard) had more blocks than our starting center this year.

Ken Strickland

June 2nd, 2009
7:09 pm

CA$H-like I said, you can’t see the forest for the trees.

CLYDE-Woodson’s DEF strategy is to have his players constantly switch, rather than fight over picks like all other teams do. This allows teams to easily create mismatchess, and as a result, AHorford, as well as JSmith, are far too often out on the perimeter trying to defend against the DWades and LJames. Once they’re beaten, which is a given, only our guards and/or SF are left to protect the basket against their BIGS.

Remember, until Woodson went exclusively to his switching DEF, JSmith had battled for the shotblocking title the 2 previous seasons. I’ve often wondered if his permanent switch to this type of DEF was a way of compensating for beloved PG MBibby’s inability or unwillingness to fight over picks to keep his man in front of him.

If you’ve ever wondered why Woodson is so loyal to MBibby, despite his limitations and liabilities, consider this. IF FORMER GM BKNIGHT HADN’T ACQUIRED MBIBBY IN THAT TRADE, THE HAWKS SURELY WOULDN’T HAVE MADE THE PLAYOFFS AND WOODSON WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN FIRED.

Blast

June 2nd, 2009
7:36 pm

Sekou where are ya? You on vacation fishin’ with the Hawks? We need a new blog. Mark Bradley is kicking your ass whipping out new blogs almost daily.

niremetal

June 2nd, 2009
9:12 pm

Once again, Clyde shows that he can’t fathom the possibility that good defense might NOT involved blocked shots or steals. *ding ding*

bigdave

June 2nd, 2009
11:51 pm

Sope Creek

June 15th, 2009
10:17 am

Enter your comments here

Sope Creek

June 15th, 2009
10:24 am

Just for a little perspective, Pau Gasol was the guy the Hawks took at #2 in order to effect a trade with Memphis to get Sharif Abdur-Raheem. The Lakers’ big man more than offset Dwight in the finals this year, and to me that just provides all that much more impetus for the Hawks to continue to build this team through drafting and developing players rather than trading those picks for players whose worth is already maxed out or waning.

I have no problem with adding role pieces through highly selective free agent signings, such as the additions of Flip and Mo this year. But I’d hate to give up the Hawks’ future in favor of a compromised present.

WolfmanJack

June 15th, 2009
1:39 pm

I dont think Dennis Scotts 95 Magic are as good as the 2009 Magic. I believe that the 2009 Magic could have been the 2009 NBA Champions. I dont think the Lakers beat the Magic. I think the Magic gift wrapped the title and gave it to the Lakers. The Magics inexperienced showed in game two when Courtney Lee could have won the game for the Magic had he converted the easy layup play from Hedo Turkelu. Lee failed to convert, the Magic went into overtime and lost that game. The Magic won game 3 but had to shoot the highest shooting percentage in NBA history in the finals to pull that game off. Also in game 4, when the Magic were up by 3 with seconds to go, Hedo Turkeleo AND Dwight Howard both missed all four of their freethrows. I couldnt believe it but it was almost as if history had repeated itself from 1995. Back in 1995, Nick Anderson missed four consecutive freethrows that caused a game to go into overtime, that could have been won in regulation had Anderson made just one of those four freethrows. Well in game four, when Turkelu (an 88% free throw shooter) missed his two freethrows and Dwight Howard missed both of his, most people missed this but it was de ja vu all over again and the loss happened in exactly the same fashion as when Nick Anderson missed his four freethrows in 1995, because it was FOUR CONSECUTIVE FREE THROWS THAT WERE MISSED. Its amazing all the media outlets missed it, but I didnt because I am a student of Sports. The same thing happened in 2009 as what happened in 1995. FOUR CONSECUTIVE FREE THROWS WERE MISSED AND ALL YOU NEEDED TO SEAL THE WIN WAS MAKE ONE FREE THROW OUT OF THE FOUR. If Howard had made one OR if Turkelu had made one oof their freethrows the Magic would have one game four. The Magic just needed one of those free throws to ice the game. They didnt get any, Derek Fischer hit a 3 pointer and sent the game into overtime. Its amazing how much bad luck the Magic have. The worst that should have happened in the series had the Magic pulled out game four, even after losing last night is that the Magic would have been going back to Los Angeles down 3-2, just having to win two games on the road to secure the title. Had the Magic won game four and Courney Lee converts his layup at the end of game two with the score tied at 88 all; even with last nights loss, the Magic would have had a 3-2 lead, with two chances to close it out in Los Angles, with the Lakers facing elimination. Its too bad because I dont think the better team won. Its true Kobe got his title and his ring and Im happy for that because he is a really class act, but for the Magic to struggle in this series with hardly no luck at all, with the only win the Magic could muster was that they had to break two records to secure that win. Best shooting percentage in a half at 75%, and best shooting percentage in an overall game at 62%. In spite of all that, the Magic won that game 3 by only 4 points. I really believe the Magic were the better team, but they played tight and scared throughout the entire series, instead of fast and loose. I will ALWAYS BELIEVE THAT THE 2009 NBA TITLE WON BY THE LAKERS WAS GIFT WRAPPED BY THE MAGIC. The lakers didnt win the title, the Magic gave them the title.