In his passionate closing statement before the state Board of Education on Thursday, attorney Bob Wilson hearkened to fallen soldiers, the flag and the Constitution in an effort to save the jobs of his clients, veteran DeKalb County school board members
“I look at that flag back there and I think about the young men and now the young women who lost their lives defending it. For what? Freedom of speech, the right to vote, they are right at the top, ” Wilson told the state board at the end of the 14-hour hearing. “The ballot box must be given huge, huge deference in this county. If it is not, we are lost.”
A former DeKalb district attorney and one of the two attorneys tapped by Gov. Sonny Perdue in 2010 to probe CRCT cheating, Wilson didn’t land a winning punch with this powerful imagery.
A unanimous state board voted to recommend that Gov. Nathan Deal suspend the DeKalb board. The state board wasn’t impressed with what one member called DeKalb’s “deathbed repentance,” telling the six members that their history of dysfunction outweighed their promises of change.
But Wilson may get to give the speech again and perhaps to a more receptive audience.
On behalf of the DeKalb board members, he filed suit in Fulton County Superior Court and in U.S. District Court arguing the law allowing the governor to oust school board members in troubled districts is unconstitutional. A hearing in Fulton Superior Court on Thursday could restrain the governor from proceeding on the suspensions. A hearing in federal court is scheduled for Tuesday, but Wilson requested it be rescheduled because the transcript from the state board hearing will not be ready.
In turning to the courts, DeKalb joins six Sumter County board members who challenged the law in November and forestalled their removal from office.
Deal will announce Monday at 11 a.m. whether he will follow the state board’s lead and suspend the DeKalb board. (On Friday, Wilson asked the federal court for an injunction to stop Deal from acting on the state board’s recommendation. Will post if the court issues that temporary restraining order.)
“Removing elected officials from office is a serious duty, not undertaken lightly,” the governor said in a statement Friday. “That responsibility, however, pales in comparison to the importance of assuring the credibility of students’ education.”
There are legitimate questions about empowering a governor to unseat school boards that the courts — and all Georgia voters — ought to consider:
Among them:
•The law provides for removing board members without any showing of any wrongdoing or even a lack of discretion.
•The law cedes unprecedented and almost absolute power over elected officials to a private accrediting agency, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. The law specifies that boards can be removed by the governor after being put on probation by its accrediting agency. In this case, that agency is SACS, which has been far more troubled by 5-4 school board votes than by chronically low test scores and faltering academics. As Nancy Jester, one of the DeKalb board members recommended for suspension, noted about the SACS criteria for accreditation: “You can be a school board of distinction, but the student achievement can be abysmal.”
•Why should the governor have the power to remove school board members for ineffectiveness yet pay no heed to crazy city councils and loose-cannon county commissions? There are many dysfunctional elected bodies around the state whose antics, while also not criminal, are irrational and damaging. (Some might cite the General Assembly as an example.)
•The law could be challenged for not only being unconstitutional, but incomprehensible. Last month, the state board told DeKalb emphatically that the law required all school board members, regardless of tenure, must be removed. Thus, DeKalb’s three brand-new members would go, too, if suspension were recommended. It was “all or nothing,” according to the state board.
However, at the start of the state board hearing last week, the Department of Education attorney reversed positions, saying the three newcomers wouldn’t be ousted because they had no role in DeKalb’s fall from grace with SACS. But the DeKalb board members elected two years could make the same argument, especially since it was conceded by SACS that DeKalb’s management problems go back a decade. Yet those two-year board members were recommended for removal.
•The big beneficiary in this debacle may be the governor, who gets to make a political decision that will widely be seen as heroic: removing the controversial DeKalb school board. Even if the courts overturn the law, it won’t be a loss, as Deal really doesn’t want to run the DeKalb schools.
Several speakers at the board hearing declared it was a “new day” in DeKalb. But many of the old problems — racial and economic divides, a ravaged real estate market, a growing underclass — remain. And it’s not apparent that a hand-picked school board will be enough to solve them.
–From Maureen Downey, the AJC Get Schooled blog
201 comments Add your comment
living in an outdated ed system
February 23rd, 2013
9:21 am
In response to your post trying to shift some of the focus to SACS, I would counter your suspicions with the following datapoint which says it all:
Dekalb is the ONLY school system out of 1,000 in the United States placed on probation!
If SACS has too much power, then it doesn’t look like they take this step very lightly. To the six board members: do the right thing, follow the will of your constituents, and stop spending taxpayer dollars to fight a battle nobody wants to see happen. You are showing how selfish you are, and how all you care about is the power of controlling a $1B budget. Think about the children and move on.
This is getting more ridiculous by the day….
Attentive Parent/Invisible Serfs Collar
February 23rd, 2013
9:23 am
Yes. Every school board member, parent, legislator, members of Deal’s staff, should read the AdvancED Quality Standards to appreciate just how little knowledge and academics are the priority driving who SACS accredits and what its priorities are. They need to understand what Social Construction in education means and that SACS uses taxpayer money to foist it on school districts as well as colleges and universities.
Finally they need to be familiar with the accreditation agencies like SACS and its parent company, AdvancED’s, relationship with UNESCO. UNESCO was created in the 1940s to push a cultural evolution on the West via education that would ultimately change mental consciousness through education to values, beliefs, attitudes, and ultimately behaviors that were comparable to Marx’s development model for humanity.
And that is precisely what SACS does. It is what Atlanta Public Schools pushed so hard and why Beverly Hall was so coddled whatever she did. She was pushing the desired sociocultural Consciousness transformation model and that was all that mattered.
So yes they have too much power. They are the primary driver of cultural poison in education today. And paid well for the mind arson.
Attentive Parent/Invisible Serfs Collar
February 23rd, 2013
9:27 am
That should be Social Reconstruction.
Need more caffeine this rainy morning. And when I mention Uncle Karl it is because he or a modern surrogate like Erik Erikson are repeatedly cited in documents I have pertaining to the actual Common Core implementation. And where those Standards for Teaching and Learning were going when they were created in the 90s. The ones so lovingly adopted by APS. The ones both President Obama and Ed Week have called the real common core.
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
9:27 am
Way, way too much power is given to an unaccountable, private company, AdvancED. AdvancED does not answer to anyone in Georgia – certainly not the People of Georgia. Mark Elgart, its CEO, prances around like he is some 17th Century prince, who has some divine right to issue educational edicts at his capricious and arbitrary whim. To tell you the truth, this law giving SACS any power is ridiculous. But, it is a law that is liked by the self-perceived elite of this State who, quite frankly, don’t like democracy because “the masses” have way too much power and often elect those whom they do not approve. Governor Deal needs to show some moral mettle and actually reject this law as unconstitutional and state clearly that he will stand by the decision of the voters of DeKalb County. This would a profile of courage, though he might be given the cold shoulder by the scions of the Gridiron at the next Athens meeting.
NorthAtlantaJoe
February 23rd, 2013
9:28 am
The law is clearly unconstitutional to the extent it gives the Governor or anyone else the right to “appoint” school board members. The Ga. Constitution unequivocally states that the Board of Education “shall be elected.” I doubt the removal portion will pass constitutional muster either, but even if the board members could be removed, who runs the show while a new election is being organized? From what I can tell, the problems in DeKalb have been ongoing for many years, and yet 6 of the Board members have been re-elected despite these ongoing problems. Are DeKalb citizens saying their too stupid to vote for competent board members so let’s have the Governor appoint some political hacks for us? That would be ironic since i doubt Governor Deal won a majority of DeKalb County votes in his election.
catlady
February 23rd, 2013
9:28 am
The Dekalb SB need to go. HOWEVER, it is troublesome that the governor, with his penchant for filling jobs with family and cronies, oversees the naming of the new board members.
The worst part of this law is ceding even more power to SACS, a capricious protection racket. Seeing it in action, and watching how it has changed from counting books in the library to requiring that school board members all agree, and follow the directions of their (unelected) leader, their superintendent, would turn anyone’s stomach. I would think that no one would want to grant authority to an entity like SACS, especially our “good Republican” leadership.
I don’t think ANYTHING nowadays should hinge on SACS approval. There ARE other accrediting agencies, and perhaps another agency would be concerned directly about the children.
Pardon My Blog
February 23rd, 2013
9:32 am
There has to be oversight by an unbiased third party. Is SACS the correct agency? Maybe, maybe not. One solution for Governor Deal, remove the six individuals appoint interim Board members and then have a special election (perhaps July) for the citizens of DeKalb to elect replacements and at the same time eliminate two of the positions to bring the Board to the desirable size of seven. No one that was removed can run again and institute term limits. Ensure that the candidates vying for the position have no connection to any of the past failed superintendents, no relatives employed by the system, no criminal history and no credit issues, and have the skill set to make informed decisions.
Hey Maureen!
February 23rd, 2013
9:34 am
I don’t care how they get rid of them. From what I know and have seen, the Dekalb BOE is selfish and irresponsible. They are not focused on education and apparently the citizens have not been able to elect a responsible Board. Yes, this is a legal issue, but it is also a moral issue. It should be about the students, but it is not. Sad.
d
February 23rd, 2013
9:37 am
Here’s my overall problem with this – we have an unaccountable agency saying there is a problem, we have an appointed board saying that we should remove the elected board. Georgia seems to have a fondness recently of giving appointed boards power over our locally elected officials.
Pardon My Blog
February 23rd, 2013
9:38 am
@NorthAtlantaJoe – I’m sure you see DeKalb in the news daily and unfortunately you see what makes up part of the voting block. Add to that the extreme liberals in the county and voila we get representatives like Hank Johnson and Board members like Eugene Walker.
Pardon My Blog
February 23rd, 2013
9:40 am
@catlady – I guess if King Roy were governor you would give the green light?
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
9:40 am
many of the old problems — racial and economic divides, a ravaged real estate market, a growing underclass — remain
You’ve got to start somewhere. I have some experience unwinding complex messed up situations. It takes time, patience, and a lot of hard work. Even if the hedge fund managers take the profit from the economy, there is no reason DeKalb can not have an efficient school system, even if everyone is working with a box of toothpicks. I’ve recently seen real-life examples of “messed up” and “efficiency.” Efficiency is when someone does a job well in one day and it is complete. “Messed up” is when someone makes the wrong decision on the front end, then messes up the work, does not complete the work, and then leaves mess untended for 10 days until someone forcing them to return and clean up their mess, which is done at the pace of a resentful turtle. That’s what “messed up,” when incompetent adults, or adults with character issues, mess things up. I’ve seen the two side by side within feet of each other. Someone has to be the boss, be in charge, have their name on it, and make it right.
d
February 23rd, 2013
9:41 am
@Pardon – I have personally wrestled with the idea of term limits and I have come to decide that they are not likely in our best interest. On the one hand, you do get rid of the people constantly focusing on running for office and focusing on doing their job, but on the other hand, when an elected official is term limited, they don’t have to answer to the people anymore. Case in point – look at all the nice stuff in and surrounding Houston County that we got at the expense of important things like education in the last few years of Sonny Perdue’s term in office.
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
9:42 am
I would strongly urge the readers to visit the Invisible Serf’s blog (Invisible Serf Collar). She knows what she is talking about. The People of Georgia (and the nation) are being led around with rings in their noses by organizations like SACS which really have a social agenda which has nothing to do with content-based education.
@ “living in an outdated ed system”: Why is DeKalb the only system in 1,000 to fall out of graces with SACS? Because Mark Elgart decided this. The only reason. If you actually think that other school boards and other school systems don’t engage in the same little politics as DeKalb, then you are as naïve as wrestling fans. You are a mark who will believe any drama that a booker will create. Mark Elgart is like a wrestling booker. He creates this drama and hysteria, and then the wrestling fans get all worked up. At nineteen years old, I was a ring announcer for professional wrestling here in Georgia. (I still do announce professional boxing these days.) I have seen this hysteria in action. Mark Elgart decreed that DeKalb was bad, and then people like you have swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. Are there some bad and incompetent things going on in DeKalb? Yes…just like on many other school boards and systems (note Fulton, Cobb, and Gwinnett). But, you let the voters do the removing, not the Governor.
By the way, my coffee has stopped brewing. I need to get my first cup too.
Lee
February 23rd, 2013
9:46 am
Inqiring minds and all that….
——————————–
What happens if the board members are removed, replaced by Gov Deal, and in the next election, they run again and are re-elected?
——————————–
If Deal uses the current law to oust the board members and replace them, can the new board members vote to stop the lawsuit and stop paying the lawyers?
——————————–
I thought the state already had the power to come into a failing school, fire the administration and staff and replace them. Couldn’t they have done the same by leaving the school board, replacing the superintendent, who would have strict instructions to clean house?
——————————–
It is not the answer you seek, but the question….
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
9:48 am
There may cause for a parallel case re: is SACS the best mechanism for regulation, and why was the DeKalb situation allowed to occur in the first place. One thing about SACS regulation is that due to their multinational interest, their involvement prohibits Georgians from shaping and directing their own schools, in particular when SACS exercises influence on choosing superintendents, applies influence on directional themes. I wonder, when “DeKalb was great in the 60’s/70’s,” was SACS involved? Does anyone know how regulation was done at that time?
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
9:49 am
@Dr. Trotter
I think your wrestling fans comment is a good analogy for some of the voters in Dekalb County, both North and South.
catlady
February 23rd, 2013
9:52 am
Pardon: No. But it is rather ironic that a governor as challenged as the current one should be allowed to fill yet another group with his minions/cronies.
I am sorry the Dekalb voters are so gullible/stupid/uneducated/you fill in the blanks that they have not corrected this problem long since.
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
9:53 am
I think Maureen is asking the wrong question. The state law doesn’t give SACS the authority over the board. Its still the unelected SBOE and the governor who have the authority over the board. The question is whether the state is allowing SACS to have too much power over the school districts.
SACS needs to go. I didn’t agree with Dr. Trotter and others until I saw what Mark Elgart said before the SBOE. Our districts’ accreditation and the future of our students college admissions and scholarships is being determined by an agency that doesn’t allow the school district to know the specific allegations and doesn’t keep documentation supporting its report. That is totally unacceptable. We need to find an alternative.
catlady
February 23rd, 2013
9:55 am
PC: the standards for accreditation were quite different back then. Also, at that time, few systems were accredited. Many systems were thrilled to have just their high school accredited.
Maude
February 23rd, 2013
9:56 am
Someone has to look after our children’s education and keep self serving adults from stealing from the children. If no one else is watching the adults then all SACS all the power they need! Everyone on these blogs seem to be forgetting about the children!
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
9:57 am
@ Catlady: Very good points. SACS has long-since left the notion of examining the number of books in the library, etc. AdvancED actually has an agenda to control the school boards. The school boards, in AdvancEd’s and Mark Elgart’s apparent opinion, should be subservient to the superintendents. This is upside down. It is ridiculous. But, I have always said that SACS stands for Still Advocating for Cronies and Superintendents (SACS). Yes, indeed, Georgia does have another accrediting agency which has the same weight behind it, but it seems to go about accrediting the schools without all of the hoopla. The Georgia Accrediting Commission (GAC) has been accrediting schools in Georgia since 1904…way before SACS. It is headed up by an esteemed educator here in Georgia, Dr. Carvin L. Brown.
http://www.coe.uga.edu/gac/
Pardon My Blog
February 23rd, 2013
9:58 am
@catlady – Do not lump us all in with the “gullible/stupid/uneducated” because not all of us vote Democratic! Unfortunately, in DeKalb, the informed voters are outnumbered by a block of voters who vote based on (1) color of skin, (2) preacher told them who to vote for, or (3) friends and family!
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
9:59 am
@catlady
“But it is rather ironic that a governor as challenged as the current one should be allowed to fill yet another group with his minions/cronies.”
That’s not the scariest alternative. Our equally challenged Dekalb legislative delegation may be giving him the names. Some of these most vocal about replacing the board may go apopletic if Representative Mosby gives the governor a list of 6 Dr. Walker clones to join the board. That result would not surprise me a bit.
Dekalbite
February 23rd, 2013
10:00 am
IMO – it took SACS way too long to recommend probation and possible loss of accreditation so that would argue for more stringent oversight for students. Does anyone think SACS wants to “ruffle any feathers”? DeKalb mismanagement by the Board just became too egregious for even SACS to overlook. DeKalb Schools was/is running a deficit and they do not have a way to raise the mileage rate higher (we are within a quarter of point from the top – millage rate of 25 – allowed by state law). They cannot cut teachers pay anymore because they are not paying any local supplements for teachers – teachers are now making the state funded minimum allowed by state law. Since they can’t raise taxes any higher and they can’t cut teachers pay or benefits (they don’t pay social security and they cut the board sponsored TSA which replaced social security over 30 years ago), they have no place else to cut unless they cut into the enormous amount of non teaching admin and support staff, cut legal bills, multi million dollar scripted learning problems, consolidate small schools that don’t receive full state funding, cut magnet and special program transportation, etc.
This is a county that has the highest mileage rate and the lowest teacher compensation and yet we are running a deficit. As the SACS and the state auditor pointed out, it is against the law for a school system to run a deficit.
the DCSS Board can’t raise the mileage rate, they can’t cut teacher pay anymore and they refuse to do anything else but stay out of compliance with the law. That seems to be a legal issue that SACS focused on.
Just because they are elected officials, can they fail to uphold the law by doing nothing to remedy the budget and let us run a deficit? SACS (and Nancy Jester) KNEW they would be breaking the law if they ran a deficit. They had the information in front of them that they would be running a deficit and they KNEW this was against the law, but they did it anyway.
Perhaps we should ask ourselves if elected officials are above the law? IMO – the answer would be no. Letting them continue I office would have be a resounding yes.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
10:03 am
Dr. Trotter, Great post, but maybe you must admit? that as one of the state board said, DeKalb has become a magnet attractor for lawsuits. We differ in opinion, in that I thing the state is stepping to the plate to due their regulatory duty. Thank you for commending Serf’s Collar work, it is impressive, informative, highly relevant.
Well. One other thing. Real wrestlers wear a mask and know how to fly. These are the two basic requirements of real wrestling. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJob-xORJWE
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
10:15 am
@ P. R.: I never saw Big Bill Dromo or Dusty Rhodes or Ernie “Bit Cat” Ladd go flying through the air like that! Ha!
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
10:16 am
Pardon my chopped up spelling. The wrestling thing reminds me that some of the Hong Kong kung-fu actors came from acrobat-training acting academies. Notably, Jackie Chan and Sammo Hung, also known as “Jackie Chan’s fat friend” are really trained as acrobats / stuntmen / circus school. In particular, Sammo in impressive because with his shape and size, his skills are unexpected. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_p7AZO9Hx0c#t=0m34s
‘Recently figured out that Shaw Brothers studio, Hong Kong, make a thousand movies. A lot of the Shaw Brothers movies are like kung-fu spaghetti westerns with a lot of Ming dynasty thrown in.
DCSD BOE is unconstitutional representation
February 23rd, 2013
10:17 am
The fact that we have gotten to this point and have people screaming “constitutionality” when the local and state law does not have CHECKS AND BALANCES to control the negligence that has occurred directly by the collective DSCD BOE entity and their individual members. The ability for the SBOE and Gov. Deal brings us one step closer to ensuring accountability. I would tell all of the people who are screaming about their vote to understand that the American Republic was founded with a system of checks and balances to prevent abuses. DeKalb did not look at such a viable and long-standing structure when we went with a CEO structure in DeKalb, added BOE Reps at Large and how to manage the majority of our tax dollars going to the school system and subsequently watch this Body of Egregious Ineptitude (aka DCSD BOE) perpetually rob our children and teachers with no accountability.
Why? All of these “Elected” offices in DeKalb are job guarantees for the people who can’t cut it in the private sector. Where else can you get paid $18K in base, plus a travel account, phone, fax, etc. and have NO QUALIFICATIONS, BARELY SPEAK ENGLISH PROPERLY, HAVE NO ACCOUNTABILITY, LAWYERS AT YOUR BECK AND CALL, AND YOU CAN’T GET FIRED.
Perfect job for the people we currently have there because they have the one qualification that
Billy Mitchell said is required: THEY HAVE A PULSE AND LIVE IN DEKALB. Brilliant assessment, Senator. If that is all we aspire to provide our children and educators, let’s keep all of them!!!
Allow ALLOW OF DEKALB RESIDENTS to VOTE FOR ALL OF THE SEATS – PERIOD. We have unfair representation with the current set-up and TAXPAYERS AND VOTERS need to be screaming for the unconstitutionality of our representative structure. Look at how we elect a president with the Electoral College. Implement true representation for our children.
DunMoody
February 23rd, 2013
10:22 am
Yes, SACS is the wrong trigger for BOE overturn. That organization’s focus on school board governance rather than achievement is one reason this took so long. Nancy Jester is absolutely right. But it’s the only trigger our short-sighted legislature gave us, so we have to use it. The State Board of Education, State School Superintendent, and legislature have ignored the looming meltdown in DeKalb for so long that it took a surge of public outrage and (AT LAST) media focus on the issues to bring the BOE’s decade-long mismanagement, nepotism, and financial irresponsibility to light.
Deal won’t do it, but the only BOE members who should go are Walker, Cunningham, and Copelin-Wood. They are still too all-powerful and are the last mainstays of cronyism in DeKalb schools.
Many of us in DeKalb have determined that local control is the only way out, so I’m looking to Representative Tom Taylor and his pending legislation to begin the long road back to quality education. I hope Fran Millar advocates for his constituents as well. The parent trigger law is a watered-down mess and the charter cluster option keeps the DeKalb BOE in charge. No thanks.
LOGIC
February 23rd, 2013
10:34 am
@DM – agreed that we need to get to local control and hope Taylor’s bill makes it. How do we organize more effectively to make it happen for the health and viability of public education in the metro area? I do not know if the same model we need here in the city is viable for more rural area.
I find this so sad because there are those of us who truly believe in public education for all children have to decide and fight for our local community and not for the county as a whole because the current structure only penalizes our children and teachers.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
10:36 am
yah. that’s some stuff right there. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJob-xORJWE#t=3m35s
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
10:36 am
P. R.: I was actually at the event in Columbus, Georgia when Mr. Wrestling (# 1 or # 2 — I can’t remember) had his mask removed by a local “thug.” I know his name but won’t repeat it here since he was not a professional wrestler but a local “tough guy.” Mr. Wrestling offered like $400 — a lot of money back then — for anyone who could stay in the ring with him for more than five minutes or something like this. The point of this story is to never invite someone who is not part of the business or the show to get involved. A real shoot took place. Arnold — oops, I said his first name — got off Mr. Wrestling’s mask. They hit the floor engaging in real fighting. Heels and Baby Faces came out of both dressing rooms to help Mr. Wrestling as he emerged with half of his finger missing. Real story. It really happened. I was there. You can’t fake your finger being bitten off. My point here? I hope that AdvancED emerges from these episodes in Clayton and DeKalb with its metaphorical finger missing.
Why was I at a wrestling match back in the 1960s? I was a friend of Dick (”Go Dickie Go!”) Steinborn who himself was a great Baby Face. His father, Milo Steinborn, was, I think, the only independent promoter in Florida. He promoted at the Sports Stadium in Orlando. Milo at one time was the strongest man in the world. I later became Dick Steinborn’s ring announcer as he promoted in Columbus, Georgia.
I love using these wrestling analogies. My brother says that FOX News is like watching Georgia Championship Wrestling. I say the same thing for MSNBC. More entertainment than news.
DunMoody
February 23rd, 2013
10:45 am
Why in the world do otherwise informative comment threads go off in surreal directions (wrestling?). Scrolling past now …
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
10:49 am
What if the President established an appointed board which recommended to him to do away with the right to bear arms? What if the U. S. Congress passed “a law” that contradicted the Second Amendment which grants American citizens the right to bear arms? Some of you who are saying, “Well, we understand that SACS might not be kosher, but the DeKalb Board of Education is so bad that we are just going to have a blind eye when it comes to the constitutionality of this law.” What is good for the goose is good for the gander. I am a constitutionalist. I believe in the right to bear arms because our U. S. Constitution guarantees it. I also believe in the right of the People to vote for school board members because our Georgia Constitution guarantees it.
Would you be willing to let SACS, the State Board, and the Governor do away with the right to own a gun?
Mary Elizabeth
February 23rd, 2013
10:51 am
“The ballot box must be given huge, huge deference in this county. If it is not, we are lost.”
========================================================
I agree with that sentiment. What are we educating our students for, if not to appreciate individual freedom of voice as given to each American citizen through the ballot. African-Americans well understand how valuable the ballot is to freedom. In an extreme analogy, what if members of a local School Board do not agree with a given Governor’s ideological agenda? Could that Governor, conceivably, remove members of that School Board from office so that students in that school district are indoctrinated into the Governor’s particular political ideology?
Think that analogy extreme? Please read the link, below, concerning how academic freedom of thought for professors in some universities is now being compromised by powerful, billionaire ideologues who are “buying” away their academic freedom of thought. The present situation with the DeKalb Board of Education requires reflection beyond how to handle that particular School Board’s problems because decisions now made concerning members of that particular Board of Education will set precedent which will effect other citizens in the state of Georgia, well into the future.
http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/1277
LOGIC
February 23rd, 2013
10:59 am
@Trotter & ME – so, you are both ok with improper representation as we currently have with the DCSD BOE? I think a refresher on how a public system is supposed to be structured to prevent abuses is needed.
Voting and the sanctity of voting are meant to ensure representation. Currently, the majority of DeKalb citizens are not represented because each seat counts the same and does not represent the population as a whole.
Where are the rights for the majority of the population? If you recall the map during the presidential election, it was a lot of “Red” but “Blue” prevailed because of the small pockets with high populations. Let’s do the same in DeKalb and get us some real representation.
The SBOE asked intelligently questions and functioned as a real Board. Their recommendation directly supports the children and the taxpayers and acts in the best interest of the people. DCSD BOE has FAILED to do this year over year and we as DeKalb Citizens, which Trotter is not, have had few options to change this structure because of how poorly this county is structured.
Do you both really want to continue punishing those of us in DeKalb who want an education for all children? Shows how little you value education and the purpose and JOB of elected officials.
These people need to be impeached and just cause has been proven with years of documented negligence and these individuals inability to act as an effective collective body. They need to FIRED.
Dr. John Trotter
February 23rd, 2013
11:19 am
Since we are hitting on the wrestling theme relative to SACS and the DeKalb County Board of Education, let me re-submit (with minor changes) a post that I submitted a day or two ago…
Speaking of Georgia Championship Wrestling, it appears that the DeKalb Team has been thrown over the ring ropes and Homer O’Dell will be leading Buddy Colt and Billy Spier in the next grudge match against Mark Elgart and SACS which are being led by the Tag Team Managing Team of Bill and Melinda Gates.
Eugene Walker, morphing the illustrious Dusty Rhodes, has been targeted as the bad guy personified. But the real bad guy in this episode is Dusty’s former partner with the Texas Outlaws, Dick Murdoch, who is being morphed by Mark Elgart who has monies galore behind his team. Ole Gene (aka Dusty) will be the Champion of the People again. I don’t think that you’ve seen the last of Dusty Walker…even in the DeKalb School Board races. I think that Dusty Walker’s Team will control the next school board elections in DeKalb School. The Big Man from Upson County was made to look like a real Heel, but deep down the voters of DeKalb see him as their adorable Baby Face.
I remember seeing a wrestling magazine in the Summer of 1976. The headline was this: “The Question Terrifying the Wrestling World: Will Dusty Rhodes Turn Bad Again?” Ha! I love watching the American Dream do interviews on TV. No one could talk more smack than the Dream. Ole Gene Walker is the Dusty Rhodes in this wrestling scenario in DeKalb County. Do people forget that Ole Gene has been elected many times to different offices in DeKalb? This is the problem. The powers lurking behind the SACS’s imbroglio with the DeKalb Board of Education know that they cannot control or influence Ole Gene Walker. This is why, in their small minds, he had to go. School systems are about money these days. We’re not talking about small money. We’re talking about the big money that the Gates Foundation, the Pearson Group (the largest educational company in the world, including McGraw Hill and many other publishing companies), the Broad Foundation, et al., apparently want. Yes, before it is over, Bill Gates will probably have “donated” (really “invested”) close to one billion dollars, but some estimate that his return with Microsoft apps in all of the schools could be as high as 100 billion dollars. Cantankerous school boards like Clayton’s and DeKalb’s were in the way. Only pliable and kiss-up school boards are wanted.
Actually, these groups don’t even want local school boards. Really. They want at best Regional School Boards and would really like to nationalize the schools. The several thousands of local school boards are too hard to manage. (See Clayton and DeKalb.) Therefore, the accreditors (e. g., AdvanED and its SACS) are so very important for this new national and global enterprise. Ivan Koloff (aka the Russian Bear) Elgart is really the true Heel. He is the Bad Guy (Heel) who, in my opinion, is out to destroy local control of the school boards. I think that he is just a willing pawn of the monied class. SACS, in the old days, was a harmless good house-keeping seal of approval. Today, SACS is being positioned as the ultimate totalitarian ruler which controls Public Education from pre-K through Graduate School.
The other day I was reading where the Board of Regents in Georgia merged several colleges and universities at its January meeting this year. North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College merged to become the University of North Georgia. In the publications explaining the merger, the folks declared that “SACS approved of the merger.” What? Is SACS Frederick the Great or Ivan the Terrible or King George III of Public Education? Yes, the real Heel is Mark Elgart and AdvanED. We need more Dusty Walkers to buck up to SACS. I think that the People of North Carolina essentially told SACS to kiss its collective A$s. We need more of this. We need a complete revolution against SACS and this nefarious scheme of muting local school boards and eventually eradicating local school boards. This is where it is heading folks, and you can remember that “crazy” John Trotter told you so – just like I have told you many things in the past which have occurred.
Ann
February 23rd, 2013
11:20 am
This county has been so balkanized, fractious and on high-octane largesse for so long that in the face of a major recession and fumbling it can’t right itself. But here’s the thing: if these people, inept as they may seem, are not charged with a crime, only the people who put them there should be allowed to bring them home. The law is flawed. Period. The people frothing at the mouth to execute the law remind me of those who relied on Jim Crow laws. Crazy legislatures can arrive under the dome and write all kinds of stupid legislation. That doesn’t make it good law. Good fiduciary stewardship should be required of any elected official. But lack of it, at this moment, is not a crime.
IMO, somebody should stand up to the flawed law. The problem is that I don’t want them spending my money to do it. Let them form their own legal defense fund to which contributions can be directed. If the people want them gone bad enough, they’ll speak on it via a recall or the next time around at the polls.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
11:26 am
Is trying to influence a school board to protect a school superintendent who “knew or should have known” about the largest cheating scandal in United States educational history “good governance”?
Apparently Markie Mark Elgart does.
According to this very paper (correct me if I’m wrong Maureen) Markie Mark Elgart meet privately with a former board chair El in order to strong arm into ceding the board chairmanship back to Lashundra Butler-Burks, a woman who actively conspired with Beverly Hall (according to this very paper, correct me if I’m wrong Maureen) to delete emails with evidence of cheating.
If Markie Mark was willing to help Beverly Hall survive politically (and in fact go so far as to threaten loss of accreditation in order to protect Beverly Hall) what other ethical shortcuts might he and SACS be doing, and to what political end?
Yes it does feel a bit like Morpheus asking you if you want the red pill, but still, you might want to check out Invisible Serf.
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
11:36 am
@Logic
I don’t understand the logic behind your improper representation comment. If you are promoting at large districts as a way to promote harmony, I think it displays a total lack of understanding of how this county works. Dr. Walker was elected at large over half the county. Dr. Speaks was at large over the other half. She would have lost to a much worse candidate who was focused on the needs of only one area if she had been running over the whole county. With at large voting, Dunwoody would be marginalized. Much like in Fulton County government (whose districts have previously been drawn to minimize the influence of the north), the north part of the county would be ignored.
Ella Smith
February 23rd, 2013
11:41 am
I expect the Governor on Monday will request the 6 school board members to do what is best for the students and to resign from their position. He will want the individuals to make the best choice for the students. I predict that some will resign and put the students first and that at least 3 of them will fight and will not resign. I pedict that the ones who do what is best for the students may be appointed back.
I predict the race card will be played.
I agree that SACs was slow to act. However, you really have to do something really bad to get put on probation. As an educator I have watched this process for years and it is a fair process. SACs actually goes out into the schools when going through the process and active administrators from around the state are normally involved in the process.
I also believe there must be a check and balanced system and that school board members should be able to be impeached by the state if there is a problem. Our President is elected and he can be impeached. Education of our children is a state mandate by federal laws. Our local counties and communities are not responsible for educating our children but our state legally is. That is the reason the formulas exist that take money away from counties like DeKalb, Fulton, and Cobb and give it to school systems around the state (even Gwinnett).
I know there is much question able the constitutional issue and I respect that as I come from a family with many lawyers. However, the school board must abide by certain ethics and have boundaries to protect the children in our state and nation. Otherwise local school boards can do as they please (as many of the these school board members have) and the children will suffer.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
11:52 am
“As an educator I have watched this process for years and it is a fair process”
Really Ella Smith?
It’s fair to make a private visit to a legally elected school board chair, threaten his board with loss of accreditation if he doesn’t resign, so that a board member who actively conspired to cover up systemic cheating can take his place?
Really Ella Smith? That’s fair?
Faye
February 23rd, 2013
11:56 am
What interesting discussion. Politics & Wrestling, oh my!
SACS: DeKalb County has accepted SACS’ role/judgement for years now and even upped the ante by seeking System accreditation . Whether you like SACS or not, DeKalb School System has agreed to the terms of governance and now should accept their decisions. an indictment of One out of a thousand can’t be construed as racial, careless or all-to-powerful
SBOE & Governor’s role: It is a very slippery slope. The local board has broken no laws yet has run the system into the ground and into debt. And yet most members could win re-election today.
Should DeKalb voters be protected from themselves and their choices Or does the state governing body have a right – through arduous process – to protect our children from the voters of this county?
Only one DeKalb leader has spoken out. Sheriff Thomas Brown has had the bravery to suggest the board should step aside.
Where are our other county leaders ?
Dunwoody Mom
February 23rd, 2013
11:56 am
I continue to be amused by those who insist that the State has no authority over local boards of education and should not be allowed to “impeach” those Board of Education who fail in their duty to our children.
#1. The State Constitution of Georgia requires an adequate education for all children in the public school systems. I doubt you would find many who believe the majority of students in DCSS are receiving an “adquate” education. The BOE approved the budgets which allowed massive class size increases, teacher furloughs, etc., etc.,
#2. DeKalb County School system receives almost $25 million a month from the State of Georgia for the education of the students of DCSS.
http://app3.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/qbe_reports.public_menu?p_fy=2000.
To conitinue with the comical point of view that the State of Georgia should have NO authority over DCSS and its BOE makes no sense to me.
Married with (School) Children
February 23rd, 2013
12:01 pm
HI Maureen,
A question – you wrote: “The law cedes unprecedented and almost absolute power over elected officials to a private accrediting agency, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. The law specifies that boards can be removed by the governor after being put on probation by its accrediting agency. In this case, that agency is SACS…”
Does this state law actually cede power to SACS specifically, or does it cede power to *any* of the recognized accrediting agencies?
I ask because I am wondering if the courts could decline to get involved because the board had two other possible remedies available, in lieu of suing. The board could have (1) selected another accrediting agency instead of SACS and/or (2) they could have improved their performance and never have ended up being the only board put on probation by SACS!
My hope is that a judge would look at the board, tell them they had free will and that they agreed to use this particular agency (SACS), and so the board must now deal with the repercussions of their choices.
However, I have no idea if that is actually how judges think – I am not an attorney, nor do I pretend to be one in online forums!
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
12:02 pm
Whether you like SACS or not, DeKalb School System has agreed to the terms of governance and now should accept their decisions.
Following that logic Faye, you’re saying the former “Furious Five” on the APS board should have accepted Markie Mark’s “governance” and keep as board chair a woman who (according to this very paper, correct me if I’m wrong Maureen) actively conspired with Beverly Hall to cover up cheating?
Maureen Downey
February 23rd, 2013
12:02 pm
@Faye,
To your point, a education policy expert sent me this note:
However, I also know that the influence of business interests over education has not always been for the good.
Faye
February 23rd, 2013
12:09 pm
We all accept the state’s right to remove children from their parents in certain situations.
Why should the state not have the right to remove children from this situation?
Elected officials v.s. parent’s rights.
Slippery slope indeed
Ann
February 23rd, 2013
12:11 pm
@DM, you may be onto something here. You’re right of course that all these dollars from the state flow to this county’s coffers to educate children (with all the strings that come with it). So “impeachment”? Maybe so. But on the basis of what? SACS and the mystery stories it proffered, with the declaration that it would not share it’s sources? Let’s stipulate that the state does indeed have authority over this system. If so, then the state should produce IT’S proof. During the hearing on Thursday, I never heard Howe, the Curriculum/Instruction deputy, or Perone, the CFO, say that anyone — ANYONE — approached them to get to the bottom of the textbook business. They are the deputies and they testified under oath that they were never asked a darn thing. If there’s an impeachment process in place today which allows for people to throw rocks and hide their hands, I don’t know about it. SACS, in this case, gets to do that. And it is solely on the basis of SACS that the SBOE was permitted to entertain a recommendation for removal.
Concernedmom30329
February 23rd, 2013
12:18 pm
Interesting comments from the business person, Maureen.
Emory has long seen the dysfunction of DeKalb and have walked away. It is understandable, because for a generation, we have had leaders who believe the “DeKalb” way is the only way. For those of us who are long time observers, it is frightening, because a simple look at our neighbors and we see that things can be done better, cheaper and more efficiently. But none of that logic for DeKalb schools.
Murphey
February 23rd, 2013
12:27 pm
To me, the difference between the dysfunctional DeKalb County Board of Education and other dysfunctional elected bodies such as county commissions is that the BOE is directly affecting the future opportunities of nearly 100,000 students. These are children!
They only have one chance at their education! They can’t be put on hold while the adults act like children and bullies.
I don’t think much of SACS either, especially their willingness to overlook the tremendous decline in DCSD for so long, but the buck has got to stop. If we weren’t paying so much for legal fees and a bloated central office staff we could pay our teachers a fair wage and give our children an education that will give them opportunities for success in life.
catlady
February 23rd, 2013
12:27 pm
Pardon, you make a point, but stupid/gullible/uneducated knows no party bounds, knows no racial bounds, etc. Where I live (black population less than 1%) we have the stupidest Republicans ever minted. They make decisions on issues based on exactly what you named, especially on what they see on Fox TV, what daddy says, who they are related to (everybody), and what the preacher says. You can attach the word guns or the word abortion to anything and they foam up, like peroxide on blood. It does not occur to them to actually examine an issue, look at prior acts of the person, or think independently. And planning ahead means thinking about next week.
bu2: I suspect the governor will go against anyone suggested by the Dekalb legislators.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
12:28 pm
The powerful business interest decided to consolidate their interests in the Metro Atlanta Chamber.
Yes and well saw how well that worked (according to this very paper, correct me if I’m wrong Maureen) An almost universally derided “Blue Ribbon Committee” investigation, members of which (according to this very paper, correct me if I’m wrong Maureen) actively conspired with Beverly Hall to cover up evidence of cheating, all with an expressed purpose to “finesse this past the governor” in the hopes that it might all go away.
This was supposed to “improve things”?
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
12:28 pm
@Concerned
Its kind of the Georgia way. There are so many dysfunctional things in Georgia governance. If they looked at other states, they would see lots of better alternatives. Instead, they keep upping the ante, like trying to add more counties when we already have more than any state but Texas.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
12:29 pm
There are several groups coordinated in this effort to modify DeKalb County schools: SACS, the state board of education, the governor’s office, various ancillary local political community, parent and homeowner community.
This refuse-to-behave school board seems to have a lawyer addiction, using hired counsel as a form of management, as if hired counsel is part of their collective of employees or support staff. The moral error is that this method of “support staff” does not fit budget guidelines and real fiduciary duty as guardians of public money. Any they seem thoroughly addicted to it – right up to the very end. http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-school-board-files-injunction-stop-suspensi/nWXdQ/ Truly, they just.don’t.get.it. I encourage everyone to view the hearing video when it is formatted and posted online and see how flippant / arrogant / dismissive some of these folk are to anyone regulating them. They just do not get on board or respond and seems to be under the illusion that they are a power unto themselves.
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
12:33 pm
@catlady
The Georgia way is to let local Georgia legislators have total say on their own issues. They stand by and let African American Democrats steal in Atlanta and white Republicans steal in Gwinnett. I believe someone said Deal will have a press conference with the Dekalb legislative delegation attending. That speaks to them having a lot of influence on who gets appointed, if true. I suspect they are driving the decision as much as the SBOE.
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
12:39 pm
There was a 14 hour session and deliberation of a few minutes.
The governor has a weekend naturally to make him look deliberate.
The legislature is rushing through legislation regarding the new board members.
The SBOE magically has a totally different interpretation of how the law impacts new board members.
It all speaks to this being a dog and pony show with everything already decided behind the scenes. And the Dekalb legislative delegation is going to have their hand in the pie, much like the legislature insists on being able to appoint the SBOT in our dysfunctional transportation governance. The only question is who and how much.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
12:39 pm
Dr. Trotter, in the wrestling analogy, actually the wrestlers would be the teachers and the WWE or whoever management would be the school board. The individual wrestlers do not have the power to take the wrestling organization’s money and spend $50 million dollars on using legal counsel as if they are part of the support staff.
Your 2nd amendment thing does not connect. Everyone in the country has an interest in 2nd amendment. Practically no one cares about curing or shaping a school board. A lady I know got an education doctorate from a real school and when I told her she should develop some of her ideas, she said, “The thing about education – no one cares!” I’d say that’s pretty true for the general populace. The issues are complex and unreachable for regular people, unlike the pistol on the coffee table.
If the appointed people turn out to not be wholesome, you deal with it from there. It is a work in progress.
TM
February 23rd, 2013
12:44 pm
DeKalb BoE aside, Yes SACS can trigger government constitutional over reach, with no public/goverment regulations, oversight/accountability, standards, or burden of proof. BUT, it can be an effective tool to soften the beach head to accelerate charter school deployment and expand its market.
(Note: I like charter schools as “ONE” tool to help improve public education)
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
12:45 pm
Best case scenario: They get the boot, file a big, ugly, nasty lawsuit and then maybe we get some much needed sunlight on SACS and how its ‘bidness” is done.
catlady
February 23rd, 2013
12:46 pm
Well, this will be a chance to see if the “cure” is any better than the “illness!”
I still have major concerns over the actors in this scenario. Has the board been disfunctional? Yes. Has it had the children first and foremost? No. Should the governor be allowed to replace it with others? Is the law regarding this, as dependent on SACS accreditation flawed? I say yes, in a big way.
I feel for the folks of Dekalb. (My daughter rents a house there, and I am sure at least $400 of the monthly rent goes to the school system.) I don’t have a dog in this hunt, but I shudder to think of some of the implications.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
12:47 pm
I’d like to see the make-royalty school board system gone in a lot of places. They play-act as royalty, favor their own, and mess with qualified professionals.
I had a friend who moved up to rural East Tennessee. He tried to get-on as a substitute teacher in the local school system. They wouldn’t even talk to him. He made much effort. They completely brick-walled him on just basic things, would not allow him past the threshold. He was just a regular people, but he was not from rural East Tennessee. School boards can act as gatekeepers on hiring, and the gatekeeping is not based on who is best for the jobs that need to be done. It is a conspicuous unique loophole in the American system where government can be exploited by a collective of persons motivated to do this, using public money to run a school district as if it is a private business that they own.
Bernie
February 23rd, 2013
12:51 pm
Despite all of the issues surrounding the efficiency of this Board and capabilities. What is Fast emerging as glaring concern is the Lack of Leadership and understanding of duties and responsibilities of The Intern Superintendent Michael Thurmond.
For some reason Mr.Thurmond thinks or implies he is responsible for the managing of the school Board. Mr Thurmond needs to spend a few hours in the Superintendent’s office reading and trying to find out just what are the Systems polices and duties are for the Superintendent. Instead of Flying by the seat of his pants just because he is a Lawyer.
The difference is as wide as APPLES and Oranges. Any First grader knows the difference between those two fruits..
This should be a glaring RED LIGHT for the entire community and the BOARD as well as SACS. it seems Mr.Thurmond’s inexperience and under qualifications will even further disrupt,enhance and contribute to an already further deteriorating situation. Mr.Thurmond has already proven that he is out of his depth and understanding of the issues, he is being charged with. This is the second time in two weeks he has made inaccurate and woefully uninformed statements as to what his responsibilities are.
As far as duties, Managing the School Board is certainly NOT one of Them. That would apply for any School System Superintendent. An aggressive search should be implemented ASAP before further damage and waste of Taxpayor funds are spent inefficiently.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
12:53 pm
Serf’s Collar, I greatly appreciate your macro observations, however it is a leap to say that modifying the DeKalb situation equates to implementing the political forces that you identify. If we analyse cause and effect, wanting to implement the macro initiatives is not the primary cause of this action.
This is Mrs. Norman Maine
February 23rd, 2013
1:01 pm
As a voting taxpayer, I have a real problem with a private agency having so much power over an elected school board, no matter how crazy and dysfunctional they are. Mark Elgart doesn’t like the look of you then he snaps his fingers and viola! you’re on probation! Seriously?! What is the purpose of basing accreditation on how well the school board gets along but shrugging your shoulders at poor school performance? Isn’t that the purpose of accreditation?! Personally I could care less how well the crazies like each other, I got a real problem with low academic achievement. It makes no sense.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
1:03 pm
@Private Citizen, I’d say that is the first legitimate rebuttal to anything Invisible Serf has posted thus far…
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:09 pm
Beverly, It is possible that no one will give them the time of day on their “big nasty lawsuit” and it will (again) be thrown out of court. If I make a guess, I will guess that their federal court judge will reference the state decision and say “See you. Have a nice day.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pP_hqHg4Tw#t=0m34s
LOGIC
February 23rd, 2013
1:09 pm
@bu2
My reference is tied to the number of people who vote (as in voter turnout). The paltry voter numbers in certain districts give an equally weighted seat to those in other districts where turn out is significantly and statistically higher. The current board structure fuels this complete dysfunction because those of “screaming” are trying to point out that the representation does not reflect the county from a population and tax base perspective.
It is the very structure of the board that fuels the north/south divide. Let all DeKalb residents vote for all members. Then all of candidates and reps must reach across the “north/south” divide to garner support.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
1:09 pm
But @Private Citizen I would say the marco reasons were precisely what governed (pun intended) Markie Mark’s actions with the APS school board…
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:10 pm
yer I’m pretty smart. Collar is on the case, though, and I like it.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:14 pm
Mrs. Norman, SACS is like the traffic officer writing a ticket. The violation is “fiduciary duty.” In this scenario, the traffic officer does not have power beyond that, it then goes to the court/judge. Basic stuff, really. The thing is, the scale of the DeKalb situation is why so many people / agencies are involved. It is really a very good thing.
Yes, SACS can play two roles, like the officer who can impound and tow the car, too, take it off the road.
Burroughston Broch
February 23rd, 2013
1:18 pm
@ Mary Elizabeth
What is the practical difference between the Kochs buying undue influence at FSU (one university) and the hundreds of university faculties dominated by far left liberals who allow no political outlook different than their own?
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:21 pm
Beverly, I tell myself that I will not call you Beverly because I think it is not right, but anyway, I see the whole world as a piece of graph paper, and then you apply cause and effect. If you want to make it three dimensional, apply the time / history component of where things come from, origin, evolution, and time lines. I should write an essay on it. One thing on local education, very little attention to care-taking history and sequence of ideas and where they come from. Many of the initiatives, rules and requirement, especially from the state, have no author. Some outrageous thing and it says “State DOE” at the bottom of the page. You don’t know if it came from George Soros or Pinnochio.
Hey a different subject. NPR is definitely being used as a quaalude / sedative on the populace. Turned on the radio in the car last night and they had some person in an interview talking about their warm fuzzy blanket. It sounds like a joke. I’m not kidding. That’s NPR’s function now, to keep people dumb and put them to sleep in the land of “feelings.”
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:25 pm
Burroughston Broch, you should look into “foundations” (Carnegie, Ford Foundation, etc.) and their involvement in university departments. If a grad student or professor wants to study the wrong thing and publish or teach the wrong thing, they’re out the door and quick. Why do you think they h
Burroughston Broch
February 23rd, 2013
1:25 pm
It will be fascinating to see the deal cut in the General Assembly.
Jason Carter and Shirley Franklin’s son Cabral are muttering about dire consequences if every black Democrat suspended from the Board is not replaced with another black Democrat.
Another move is to make the DCSS a refuge for out-of-office Democrat politicians – Michael Thurmond as interim superintendent, Thurbert Baker as the author of governance training, Denise Majette or Vernon Jones on the Board, etc., etc…..
Not one word about what is best for the students.
Burroughston Broch
February 23rd, 2013
1:26 pm
@ Private Citizen
One thing at a time – no diluted focus.
Thanks!
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:29 pm
Why do think they have 25 required “review” approval processes on the way to publishing a dissertation for .phd? The mechanism is done through funding. And the people doing the funding make telephone calls or write emails to direct things, when needed to direct and perpetuate their mode. Why do thing the USA thinks that the US defeated Germany in WW2 and those 168 million Russians who gave their lives crunching through the snow to kick Germany’s ass are not taught in US schools, the US gets to see the propaganda films made when the US showed up after the job was done?
living in an outdated ed system
February 23rd, 2013
1:30 pm
@Dr. Trotter – you are blaming SACS and supporting a bunch of adults who have completely violated their fiduciary responsibility. I think you are in the vast minority here, sad to say. The state must protect the welfare of the children when the voters have demonstrated their malfeasance in electing unqualified board members.
This is one of the fundamental ills of the traditional public school system.
Private Citizen
February 23rd, 2013
1:31 pm
whoops. meant to say “butt.” I should probably update / improve my forms of expression.
catlady
February 23rd, 2013
1:33 pm
BB: I sure hope none of those superstars are put on the board. The board needs basic, bright, good people. People with some small sort of expertise they can bring, not those accustomed to being rock stars, with the false vanity and expectations of grandeur. The board has already had its divas. Time to get better than that!
living in an outdated ed system
February 23rd, 2013
1:51 pm
@Dr. Trotter, there is no “quick fix” to the DCSS quagmire. In this situation, I do not think you will win the argument that you leave this up to the voters. DCSS is in crisis mode, and needs swift intervention. As @Maureen would probably agree, this is a “no-win” situation. We have a dysfunctional board that brought in a politician to run the schools. The only sensible option would be for the governor to remove the six board members, not suspend them with pay, and insert six professional managers who live in Dekalb County to fix the governance issues. Lets not forget the fact that DCSS has a 59% high school graduation rate!
You would be ok leaving the current system intact? We have nine “fiefdoms” on the board – no one is looking at the best interests of the entire school system, and no one is thinking about the children. As one commenter said in another post, Thurmond didn’t put the teachers at the top of his meeting list when he took the job!
This situation is a real mess, and this is the time for the Governor, whether you support him or not, to show true leadership, and not let politics drive the decision. Have the courage to do the right thing,which is to intervene NOW. There are few leaders in our history who have done what is right, rather than what scores them political points. One example is John Adams sacrificing his second term by not waging war with France and saving the union. Another, lesser example is Gerald Ford pardoning Nixon, so the country could heal and not be torn apart by the distraction of a messy trial of a former president.
If we wait for the voters, we risk accreditation NOW and that is unacceptable, regardless of what you think of the methods of SACS. That debate is for another day – we would not be in this predicament if it wasn’t for an incompetent board. Remember that when you author your next personal assault on Elgart.
Looking for Solutions
February 23rd, 2013
1:53 pm
Get Schooled asks a good question — does SACS have too much power? Maybe they do but -
even the President of the United States can be impeached. We need a clear method for removing school boards. Our innocent children are at risk. Dekalb is in danger of losing accreditation and any college worthy of being a college accepts students only from accredited schools.
As a taxpayer, I have a right to know where my tax money is spent and who got the money. Many Dekalb school boards think they are above the law.
So maybe SACS does have too much power but in this case, I’ll glady give them the power if they can fire this corrupt school board and get another one who will obey the law.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
1:54 pm
“DeKalb was great in the 60’s/70’s,” was SACS involved? Does anyone know how regulation was done at that time?”
In the ’60’s and 70’s, DeKalb was a predominantly white upper- middle class county. That’s why they got the Fernbank Science Center. Emory and CDC wealthy professionals added to the mix. When housing integration accelerated in the late ’70’s, the demographics changed. This is well documented.
Burroughston Broch
February 23rd, 2013
2:03 pm
I know a very respected engineer who could retire now. He is interested in the DCSS situation but lives in Dunwoody.
Do you think I should encourage him to run?
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
2:05 pm
Decatur is the Sandy Hook of DeKalb. Wealthy and influential citizens took over the independent City of Decatur school district (one elementary, middle, and high school) and turned it into one big charter for total control. If you aren’t rich enough to buy a house in the city school limits, forget it.
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
2:23 pm
@not Truth in Moderation
Before Maureen feels compelled to comment, you don’t seem to be too familiar with Decatur. There are a number of elementary schools. There is a mix of housing, only a few small pockets would I describe as wealthy. Certainly more upper middle class than otherwise, but by no means all that way. The schools are economically and ethnically mixed.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
2:31 pm
All the DeKalb school board members slated for removal are MINORITIES!
This is OBVIOUSLY A RACIAL PLOY! Why does Maureen condone this, since she is safely within the City of Decatur limits?
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/21311574/dekalb-co-school-board-files-for-temporary-restraining-order-over
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
2:41 pm
@ bu2
Thanks for tipping your hand to the bloggers. All of my points, except “only one elementary school” are SPOT ON! Otherwise, there wouldn’t have been the rush to CHARTER the entirety of Decatur City Schools. The facade of the “NOBLE NORTHERNER” is falling fast! LOL!
dekalbite
February 23rd, 2013
2:41 pm
I still don’t understand how the DeKalb Board could approve budgets that result in a deficit when those actions are against state law. Nancy Jester, a BOE member, showed them in accounting terms how they were underestimating recurring costs and explained this to them. The BOE had the numbers in hand to show they were in danger of running a deficit when they depleted the entire reserve fund. Articles were in the newspapers regarding DeKalb being the only metro system to have NO reserve fund. Moody’s downgraded DeKalb’s credit rating because of this:
http://www.crossroadsnews.com/view/full_story/19913910/article-Moody%E2%80%99s-downgrades-DeKalb-Schools-credit-rating-
This BOE knew or should have known based on the math that was accessible to them that they were creating a situation that was against the law when they took the school district into a deficit. Why are they not being investigated and possibly prosecuted for this?
gr
February 23rd, 2013
2:49 pm
What about the legal fees?
http://www.dekalbschoolslawsuit.com/
Total fees DCSD paid to Heery/Mitchell over nine years $14.6 million
Legal fees incurred by DCSD in Heery/Mitchell lawsuit $37 million
Unpaid invoices sought by Heery/Mitchell in original lawsuit $478,274
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
2:55 pm
“This BOE knew or should have known based on the math that was accessible to them that they were creating a situation that was against the law when they took the school district into a deficit. Why are they not being investigated and possibly prosecuted for this?”
It has always been my contention in this situation that if the Board members were doing something illegal to cause DeKalb’s woes, then PROSECUTE THEM and if found guilty, LAWFULLY REMOVE THEM.
OBVIOUSLY, the DeKalb School Board has enablers, AND THEIR REAL MOTIVE IS TO REMOVE ELECTED SCHOOL BOARDS from the law! This is part of the NWO takeover plot. JUST ASK “INVISIBLE SERF’S COLLAR.” Read the blog.
dekalbite
February 23rd, 2013
3:05 pm
“It has always been my contention in this situation that if the Board members were doing something illegal to cause DeKalb’s woes, then PROSECUTE THEM and if found guilty, LAWFULLY REMOVE THEM.”
Well, why is the state not investigating and prosecuting the Board members for actions that are against state law?
IMO – Removing them is a far lesser issue than investigating and prosecuting them if they took actions that were against state laws. Didn’t the state auditor say at the hearing that running a deficit was against state law? The BOE was responsible for the deficit since they authorized all expenditures and had all of the accounting numbers in front of them. As a DeKalb taxpayer, I would like an investigation of the Board as to how they could take actions that resulted in a situation that was against state law. Are there any other taxpayer out there that would like to know if they placed DeKalb Schools in a situation that was against state law?
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
3:20 pm
@dekalbite
If the AJC isn’t on board with exposing any illegality of the Board’s actions, then they are one of the enablers….
Maureen Downey
February 23rd, 2013
3:25 pm
@Truth. That is a lot of misinformation packed into one paragraph. Wrong on almost all counts, but particularly on the conversion to a charter system, which was the choice of the school chief and board. And as far as I can see as a parent, turning the entire system into charter hasn’t changed anything.
Maureen
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
3:25 pm
“Remember that when you author your next personal assault on Elgart.”
And @living I would suggest you consider that focusing strictly on the likes of Walker (no matter how much his shenanigans are reminiscent of Boss Hogg) and putting off the debate on Elgart and SACS for another day could be considered the equivalent of making sure the book gets thrown at a a fisherman who throws a beer bottle in the Gulf while we defer action on BP.
Take a look at Invisible Serf’s blog, and you might see just how dire the consequences could be if sunlight isn’t shone, and shone quickly on AdvancED.
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
3:30 pm
@once again Not Truth
“All the DeKalb school board members slated for removal are MINORITIES!”
Nancy Jester is the only Dekalb County minority being removed. The remainder are of the majority in the county. And all 6 were on the board when the county went on probation. African American Johnson, the board chair, was elected after the probation and was not removed.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
3:30 pm
Well Maureen, @3:25pm the moniker is “Truth in Moderation not “Truth to Excess”
dekalbite@bu2
February 23rd, 2013
3:31 pm
Decatur City Schools dropped from around 38% Economically Disadvantaged to around 27% Economically Disadvantaged in the 7 years in the middle of the Great Recession so its probably safe to say this area has definitely been getting much more affluent (see link below to state DOE).
Decatur City Schools is still very diverse racially and culturally, however it is not as diverse as it was in 2005. It has moved into a situation of white students being a slight majority where they were in the minority just 6 years ago. The number of African American students has remained the same, Hispanic students have increased quite a bit, but the White student numbers show a very large increase.
White students have increased in their academic performance, but African American students have seen the largest gains in academic achievement. Decatur students do very well with all of their students regardless of racial or cultural differences going by the student achievement numbers.
http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/Pages/Home.aspx
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
3:43 pm
Well bu2 Jester does appear to have a significant amount of common sense, and a degree of integrity to go along with it.
If that’s not the epitome of “minority” on this board, I don’t know what is…
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
3:45 pm
Regarding SACS, all citizens should read Advance-ed’s account of how they took over these accrediting agencies:
http://www.advanc-ed.org/company-overview
I looked everywhere to see if Advance-ed is a 501c3 charity, but I couldn’t find the info on the website. However, their web address is “.org” and SACS was originally a 501c3 so my opinion is that it IS.
SACSCOC is a 501c3, as indicated on this website:
http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/Annual%20Reports/AnnualReport2009-2010.pdf
Here is the IRS’s definition of a 501c3 charity:
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p557/ch03.html
REMEMBER, A CHURCH WAS THE ORIGINAL 501C3 CHARITY. Then came the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, etc. Foundations.
Question:
Why would a 501c3 CHARITY gain PERMANENT LEGAL STATUS AS ARBITER OF DEFINING THE STANDARDS OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL????????????
Wilbur
February 23rd, 2013
4:00 pm
Without SACS, the parents of Dekalb would be powerless against the corruption and incompetence of the Board. This sad dysfunctional drama has gone on too long. Is there any evidence that this board, left to its own will serve the children or the taxpayers of the county?
Thank goodness that there is some force that in such extreme cases of destructive malfeasance that the Board can be replaced.
I would be very careful about feeding the fires of race and politics here. Jason Carter and the democrats are walking a fine line. It would be very easy for Deal and the state BOE to walk away and leave you to clean up your own mess. Imagine if the governor issues a statement on Monday to the effect of “you broke it, you bought it”. It would be politically easier for him but bad for the children.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
4:17 pm
“I would be very careful about feeding the fires of race and politics here.”
The deafening sound of crickets from the NAACP regarding this case is QUITE SUSPECT…..
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
4:19 pm
Without SACS, the parents of Dekalb would be powerless against the corruption and incompetence of the Board.
You right Wilbur; it’s not like parents have the right to vote or anything…
Get your point Wilbur, but if you want to experience real powerlessness let AdvancEd and their ilk get their hooks in with their agenda.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
4:24 pm
Regarding SACS, all citizens should read Advance-ed’s account of how they took over these accrediting agencies:
Just google advance-ed company overview
I looked everywhere to see if Advance-ed is a 501c3 charity, but I couldn’t find the info on the website. However, their web address is “.org” and SACS was originally a 501c3 so my opinion is that it IS.
SACSCOC is a 501c3, as indicated on this website:
Just google sacscoc annual report 2009-20010
Here is the IRS’s definition of a 501c3 charity:
Just google irs publications p557 ch03
REMEMBER, A CHURCH WAS THE ORIGINAL 501C3 CHARITY. Then came the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Ford, etc. Foundations.
Question:
Why would a 501c3 CHARITY gain LEGAL STATUS AS ARBITER OF DEFINING THE STANDARDS OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL????????????
paulo977
February 23rd, 2013
4:28 pm
MARY E….’Could that Governor, conceivably, remove members of that School Board from office so that students in that school district are indoctrinated into the Governor’s particular political ideology?”
____________________________________________________________________
Of course ….. We have not ,in this red state, still internalized what democracy is all about , have we?
hind tit
February 23rd, 2013
4:47 pm
Just look into where the fed money that was suppose to go to class rooms ended up but was spent on the boe building. And why not a recall to clear this up. They can’t argue with the people that elected them. Just face it, they made a mistake and now is the time to fix it.
dekalbite@hind tit
February 23rd, 2013
5:17 pm
“Just look into where the fed money that was suppose to go to class rooms ended up but was spent on the boe building.”
True. There is the matter of the $30,000,000 they spent last SPLOST to build a beautiful new Central Office while schools have leaky roofs and torn up tracks.
The rules are made so that recall is extremely difficult. And certainly since they are elected by district, one district cannot do anything about recall in another district.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
5:38 pm
Well, this is interesting. Look where Advance-ed is located:
AdvancED
1866 Southern Lane
Decatur, Georgia 30033
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
5:54 pm
Here are the seven Advance-ed standards by which schools are evaluated:
Vision and Purpose
Governance and Leadership
Teaching and Learning
Documenting and using results
Resource and support Systems
Stakeholder Communications and Relationships
Commitment to Continuous improvement
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
6:03 pm
WOW!
I looked at their building on google street view….IT’S A MANSION!
See for yourself…
Mary Elizabeth
February 23rd, 2013
6:06 pm
Paulo977, 4:28 pm
“Of course ….. We have not ,in this red state, still internalized what democracy is all about , have we?”
==================================================
We must remain ever-thinking, conscious citizens in order to sustain our invaluable democratic republic for future generations, Paulo.
living in an outdated ed system
February 23rd, 2013
6:21 pm
@Beverly Fraud, the problem is not SACS. That is an argument you cannot win. The problem is an incompetent board. Lets not deflect blame for what ails DCSS.
Angela
February 23rd, 2013
6:44 pm
DCSS is a HOT MESS and will continue to be a hot mess. The govenor should step in and dismantle the board and I hope that it happens like yesterday. DCSS just like all other school systems within the US are mandated by both the United States Education Department and their state’s DOE. Perhaps, WHEN the state takes over the system we can find some sense of taking education back to educating instead of politics. But, education has always been political even prior to Horace Mann and the passing of public edcation for all people.
OriginalProf
February 23rd, 2013
6:55 pm
**Formerly Prof for more than a year on this blog, I find that someone else has registered under that name with AJC–not me. So now Prof is OriginalProf.**
However you may feel about SACS now, Georgia chose it as the accreditation agency for its schools. It seems to me that you can’t change the rules after you’ve started playing the game.
sam123
February 23rd, 2013
7:13 pm
Besides the DCSB there are layers of problems from the organization of the county office all the way down to the schools. We need a superintendent from another successful district to come in and reorganize the school system.
We also need teachers to explain what all the problems are. Cheryl Atkinson did this and made some changes. I really don’t know what all the issues were with her.
We did not have any financial problems in DCSS until Dr. Hallford retired. After he left, the financial sovency of Dekalb went down the drain.
I wish that we could have Dr. Alvin Wilbanks, former Dekalb principal and superintendent of Gwinnett to come over and reorganize things for us. They have more students than we do and somehow they have got it together. They have a lot of minorities but somehow their intervention for at risk students is more successful than ours is. That is the first reason that we need someone that knows how to make things happen which is in the best interest of the students.
Beverly Fraud
February 23rd, 2013
7:18 pm
@Beverly Fraud, the problem is not SACS. That is an argument you cannot win
@Living, it’s isn’t an argument I’ve tried to win. Can you point to anything I’ve written that even remotely defends Eugene “Clown Central” Walker?
But if you think fixing the board is going to fix public education in DeKalb…
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
7:52 pm
Yep. The more I look at that google street view over in Decatur, IT LOOKS LIKE IT COULD BE IN SANDY HOOK!
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/1218/Sandy-Hook-shooting-s-glare-illumines-cracks-in-mental-health-care-video
bu2
February 23rd, 2013
8:04 pm
@sam123
I agree. With Atkinson, her high level experience had been in abysmal districts-some of the worst in the country. Now after Kansas City and Lorain, she can add Dekalb to her list. The 2nd candidate in the threesome that dropped out (Duron?) had experience in good districts. He’d been in a big city district in the Houston ISD, a suburban district that was one of the best in the state in Clear Creek and a big diverse very good suburban district in Ft. Bend as well as a small town district Longview that he was superintendent before he became a candidate. He may have had some baggage, but his background was excellent for this district.
We need someone who has experience with districts that do things well, not just with similar districts that don’t do things well.
indigo
February 23rd, 2013
8:14 pm
I like what a lady said at a board public meeting.
She pointed out that, if you work for a corporation and are fired, you normally don’t hire a lawyer to get your job back.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
8:38 pm
DeKalb school board, YES YOU CAN!
You can follow in the footsteps of the Prez ($ 93,496.74) and the NAACP (since they are not helping) and hire the BEST to turn around your PR problems…..
http://www.bluestatedigital.com/about
Mr. Georgia
February 23rd, 2013
8:57 pm
Please conduct a real investigation into how Eglert came to power at SACS and how its the only show in this and many other towns in the country and you will see the truth, I dare you!!! Look what his decision to yank Clayton County’s accreditation did. It wreck the home values and made the economic conditions worse, when things were already terrible and hurt a lot of children. Many could not get scholarships or had to make concessions when it came to furthering their education. Boards and elected officials and any elected body functions poorly at times, jsut take a look at the state house, but no one threatens to unseat them over rumors and poor communication.
CompetenceNotDiversity
February 23rd, 2013
9:32 pm
This entire thread makes me weep for my country. Wrasslin’ analogies, blaming the accrediting agency, race-baiting…what a bunch of morons. I see now how we ended up with the Board we did for the last decade. Those who can will leave or opt for private school. Those who cannot will be condemned to circle the drain with the rest of the bottom-feeders. God help us.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
11:06 pm
@CompetenceNotDiversity
“Those who can will leave”
I have a suggestion, “head west young man!” It doesn’t get any better than Feinstein’s Promised Land. Lots of milk and honey…..if you play the market right. I hear ITT Educational Services is a hot stock right now. Just ask Blum Capitol Partners LP.
My2Cents
February 23rd, 2013
11:23 pm
Get them out! Stop making me – my taxes – pay for so many stinkin lawyers! This is an EDUCATION system – not a job entitlement system. FOCUS.
Truth in Moderation
February 23rd, 2013
11:26 pm
“This is an EDUCATION system – not a job entitlement system”
Public education? You sure had me fooled!
Tim
February 24th, 2013
1:35 am
Dr. John Trotter– “AdvancED does not answer to anyone in Georgia – certainly not the People of Georgia. Mark Elgart, its CEO, prances around like he is some 17th Century prince, who has some divine right to issue educational edicts at his capricious and arbitrary whim.”
Ha Ha! I couldn’t have said it any better. Mark Elgart prances around like some 17th Century prince. I mean seriously, who does this unelected hatchet man think he his?
Maureen Downey– “The law cedes unprecedented and almost absolute power over elected officials to a private accrediting agency, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. The law specifies that boards can be removed by the governor after being put on probation by its accrediting agency. In this case, that agency is SACS, which has been far more troubled by 5-4 school board votes than by chronically low test scores and faltering academics.”
Maureen, everyone needs to re-read that paragraph. How can anybody support SACS or the horrible 2011 law that gives the governor this sickening amount of power? I don’t understand why SACS is so obsessed and upset with 5-4 votes. Each member can vote however they want! It’s like SACS wants all school board members to hold hands and sing Kumbaya. That’s all they are concerned with. Student achievement? Who cares. They just want the school boards to be lovey dovey. It’s ridiculous. Almost every case that comes before the Supreme Court results in a 5-4 vote! So using Prince Mark Elgart’s logic, our Supreme Court is completely dysfunctional and incompetent. Why? Because they have a difference of opinion.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
2:02 am
Here is Dr. Mark A. Elgart’s Advance-ed bio:
http://www.advanc-ed.org/executive-leadership
Beverly Fraud
February 24th, 2013
3:05 am
As Tim say, everybody would be wise to reread Maureen’s paragraph below:
Maureen Downey– “The law cedes unprecedented and almost absolute power over elected officials to a private accrediting agency, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. The law specifies that boards can be removed by the governor after being put on probation by its accrediting agency. In this case, that agency is SACS, which has been far more troubled by 5-4 school board votes than by chronically low test scores and faltering academics.”
And to those who say one is “blaming SACS instead of the board.” Nope, some of us are saying the sole focus on the board is causing many to miss the big picture of how SACS appears to be more focused on political power plays than on helping students learn.
Unless you feel SACS trying to restore a board chair who actively conspired with Beverly Hall to cover up cheating is somehow in the “best interest of children.”
Maureen, can a reporter at the AJC ask him some of the tough, yet legitimate questions that have been asked on this blog? We’ve already laid the groundwork!
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
7:35 am
One day — and I hope soon — we will look back on this era of public education in Georgia as the Dark Days of BackwardED. We will see clearly that public education in Georgia was SACed by the Vandals from Alpharetta. In my opinion, SACS has caused nothing but harm to the educational systems of Clayton, Warren, Sumter, and DeKalb. What will be glaringly clear to us then is that predominantly black school boards and systems were disproportionately SACed by SACS whereas the predominately white school boards and school systems (e. g., Fulton, Gwinnett, and Cobb) were allowed to engage in all kinds of unethical and illegal infractions with impunity from Elgart the Hun. We will, I hope, blush with embarrassment at the stupidity of turning over the approval or disapproval of our public schools to one biased man and organization. This epoch of public education will, I again hope, will be as embarrassing as looking back on separate water fountains in Kirven’s Department Store in Columbus, Georgia. Yes, I am old enough to remember seeing the two fountains right beside each other, one nice and well-built and the other small and dingy. This was “normal” back then…just as some think that it is “normal” to allow Prince Markie to prance around in his royal pajamas as he yelps his childish and immature disapproval of certain school boards because cannot “play nice” with each other. Please, never let Mark Elgart enter into Washington City because the members of the U. S. Congress and the U. S. Supreme Court never “play nice.”
I wonder if Mark Elgart’s children or nephews and nieces attended some of the war zones schools that he would only be concerned about “school board governance.” Why is he only concerned for this? Obviously, this is so easy deal with. The real rather intractable problems in public education might actually require someone to roll up his or her sleeves and get his princely attire ruffled and soiled. Plus, it’s really about control, isn’t it? I think that Prince Elgart is caught in the power that the General Assembly of Georgia stupidly gave him. Yes, the General Assembly was stupid in ceding this power to a person who seems rather rapacious in wielding disproportionately this power. Perhaps the Church Fathers of Georgia Politics knew exactly what they were doing, thinking, “What we can’t control at the ballot box, we will control through our little willing prince.”
Pardon My Blog
February 24th, 2013
7:50 am
While everyone is so busy pounding on SACS what we are missing is that they have been able to bring to this fraudulent group before the State so something can be done. As long as anyone is able to put their name on a ballot for an elected office without having to meet a list of criteria, we are going to continue to have this debacle, especially in DeKalb where voting has been somewhat questionable since Vernon Jones opened the county doors to Katrina “refugees”. Is SACS perfect? I don’t think so but we do need to have an organization in place to provide checks and balances.
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
9:07 am
Please forgive the typos in my previous post. Hadn’t had my coffee yet. You guys have a good day!
DeKalb Inside Out
February 24th, 2013
9:18 am
What does ‘Accreditation’ even mean anymore? University of Virginia and many other schools providing top notch educations are being threatened with probation or a loss of accreditation.
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
9:54 am
DIO: I am sure that ole Thom Jefferson is turning over in his grave over SACS’s threat to take away its accreditation there. I am sure that he is not a fan of Mark Elgart. Again, I think that SACS’s threat here was about the Board of Regents talking about firing the President of UVA. SACS = Still Advocating for Cronies (e. g., university presidents) and Superintendents.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
10:02 am
@Attentive Parent/Invisible Serfs Collar
What do you make of this “self-assessment”?
http://esu17advanced.wikispaces.com/Self-Assessment
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
10:10 am
@Dr. John Trotter
Why don’t you put legs to your discourse?
AdvancEd (SACS) is a 501c3 CHARITY! I’m sure the IRS has detailed info on how they are running their organization. Please explain how a CHARITY, with VOLUNTEERS, can wield such power Constitutionally?
living in an outdated ed system
February 24th, 2013
10:20 am
@Beverly Fraud, I did insinuate that fixing the board will fix DCSS. There is NO magic bullet to reform the school system – it is indicative of the problems that most urban school systems are suffering from. However, part of the problem is governance, and it needs to be fixed. You can’t go blaming SACS for the problems of DCSS. They have done that themselves. Fixing a school system is going to be messy any way you slice it. This process is going to be painful and it will take time. But I will say UNEQUIVOCALLY that if the board members try to drag this out in the courts, they are only thinking of themselves and not the children. There is bi-partisan support for their removal – why they are “suspended with pay” is beyond me.
We need an intervention, and NOW. We also need some experienced educators helping transform DCSS, but like APS, no one will want the job when you have such a dysfunctional governance structure. It’s a vicious circle – and so very sad.
dekalbite
February 24th, 2013
10:22 am
So Thurmond and Johnson are going to bat for them and apparently they are trying to push through as much as they can in anticipation that they may be ousted by the governor. The word is they will try to raise our millage rate (we are at 24.75 so they can only raise it .25). They know the governor has called a press conference for 11:30 so they are rushing a meeting for 9:30 am – no doubt to approve money for their lawsuits. Nice to give the public less than 48 hours notice, but then the meeting is not about students or taxpayers. I emailed Dr. Johnson and my BOE rep my opinion of this:
“This just in:
February 23, 2013
NOTICE OF DEKALB BOARD OF EDUCATION CALLED MEETING
The DeKalb Board of Education will hold a called meeting at 9:30am,
Monday, February 25, 2013, in the J. David Williamson Board Room in the
Robert R. Freeman Administrative Center at the DeKalb County School
System’s Administrative & Instructional Complex, 1701 Mountain Industrial
Boulevard, Stone Mountain. Immediately following the called meeting, the
Board of Education will adjourn to the Cabinet Room for an executive
session, for the purpose of discussing legal matters.
The meeting agenda is attached. Meeting information can be accessed
online by going to: http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us, click on Leadership, go to
eBoard Home Page and click on the date for the meeting agenda\information.
Sincerely,
Dr. Melvin Johnson, Chair
DeKalb Board of Education
c: Members, DeKalb Board of Education
Mr. Michael L. Thurmond, Superintendent
Administrative Cabinet
Public, Press & Media Relations
Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, LLP
Alexander & Associates, PC
+++
Meeting Agenda
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROSTER
C. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
D. ACTION ITEM
1. Approval of Deficit Elimination Plan
E. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
F. ANNOUNCEMENTS
G. ADJOURN”
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
10:24 am
@Pardon My Blog
“While everyone is so busy pounding on SACS what we are missing is that they have been able to bring to this fraudulent group before the State”
The only thing that counts, in a nation with the rule of law, is DID THE SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS BREAK ANY LAW?? Someone posted earlier that a state attorney said they did, regarding their handling of funds. THIS IS WHAT SHOULD BE PURSUED! WHY ARE THEY NOT BEING CHARGED? SACS was just a distraction to get the foolish to give up their right to elected representation, THE REAL AGENDA. Read all about it. Google Deliberately Dumbed Down Charlotte Iserbyt. She has documented these plans since the 1970’s. Her documents came from the U.S. Department of Education, where she worked under the Reagan Adm. EDUCATE YOURSELF!
living in an outdated ed system
February 24th, 2013
10:24 am
Restating my last comment because an important word got missed in the first sentence.
@Beverly Fraud, I did NOT insinuate that fixing the board will fix DCSS. There is NO magic bullet to reform the school system – it is indicative of the problems that most urban school systems are suffering from. However, part of the problem is governance, and it needs to be fixed. You can’t go blaming SACS for the problems of DCSS. They have done that themselves. Fixing a school system is going to be messy any way you slice it. This process is going to be painful and it will take time. But I will say UNEQUIVOCALLY that if the board members try to drag this out in the courts, they are only thinking of themselves and not the children. There is bi-partisan support for their removal – why they are “suspended with pay” is beyond me.
We need an intervention, and NOW. We also need some experienced educators helping transform DCSS, but like APS, no one will want the job when you have such a dysfunctional governance structure. It’s a vicious circle – and so very sad.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
10:28 am
@Dekalbite
Well this proves one thing. The Board is not dumb.
dekalbite
February 24th, 2013
10:31 am
Here is what we paid lawyers last year. We are on track to pay $13,000,000 this year. It appears that we must pay an additional $30,000,000 in law fees if we shut down that major lawsuit (or just go on accruing tens of millions – win win for lawyers and lose lose for DeKalb children):
SUTHERLAND ASBILL BRENNAN LLP $2,530,906 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
ALEXANDER & ASSOCIATES $1,062,509 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
KING & SPALDING $713,716 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
ELARBEE THOMPSON & TRAPNELL $555,247 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
GOODMAN MCGUFFEY LINDSEY & $57,743 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
ALEXANDER & ASSOCIATES $402,589 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
CF BROCK AND ASSOCIATES LLC $34,477 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
WANDA S JACKSON PC $35,000 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
FOLTZ MARTIN LLC $32,178 PURCHASED PROFESSIONAL AND TECH SVCS
Look at the agenda above and then look at who the lawyers are at the emergency “called” meeting.
Source for payments to legal firms 2012:
http://www.open.georgia.gov/
(click on Other Expenditure>Payments>use drop downs for 2012, Local Boards of Education, DeKalb County Board of Education, Funding source select ALL
dekalbite
February 24th, 2013
10:58 am
Please try to attend this meeting and also write the BOE members. Here is a link to write your BOE members all at one time:
http://dekalbschoolwatch.wordpress.com/
(Scroll down and on the right hand side of the page you will see:
Email the Board of Education
CLICK HERE to Email the entire DCSS Board of Education as well as the superintendent.)
Here is a link to Michael Thurmond’s email address if you want to ask him about this meeting:
michael_l_thurmond@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us
Dunwoody Mom
February 24th, 2013
11:06 am
The question of why the DeKalb BOE has not been investigated is one that needs to be answered by D.A. Robert James. 2 separate Grand Juries recommended a special Grand Jury be established to investigate the BOE. Why has this not been done? Why has the D.A. continued ti ignore a Grand Jury recommendation?
Again, the State of Georgia is clear that the responsibility to educate public school students lies with the state. If State officials feel local BOE members need to be “impeached” due to dereliction of duty, then I believe the Governor has that right.
paulo977
February 24th, 2013
11:10 am
Mr. Georgia…’Boards and elected officials and any elected body functions poorly at times, jsut take a look at the state house, but no one threatens to unseat them over rumors and poor communication.”
__________________________________________________
Very well said ….this action to suspend the members is clearly anti-democratic . The electorate ought to have been allowed to go through a process of deliberating and deciciding how they would vote next . Remember here in Georgia it has taken a longer time than in northern states to journey towards democratic ways of doing things!!!
Dunwoody Mom
February 24th, 2013
11:16 am
That anyone believes this BOE is being unseated due to “rumors and poor communication” has no clue about what has been going on with DeKalb County Schools and its BOE.
dekalbite
February 24th, 2013
11:24 am
(Monday’s 9-25) Meeting Agenda
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROSTER
C. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
D. ACTION ITEM
1. Approval of Deficit Elimination Plan
E. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
F. ANNOUNCEMENTS
G. ADJOURN”
This meeting on Monday proposes to eliminate the deficit (which BTW – running a school system deficit is against the law)
Cutting services less than two weeks after he has been appointed superintendent and has been so busy trying to save BOE members (who are responsible for the school system deficit) jobs seems to go after the budget with a hatchet rather than a scalpel. If ANY of our superintendents and BOE members who approved these deficits had really tried to cut where in smart ways (i.e. least impact to the classroom) they would have seen that they couldn’t just take the easy way out and make broad cuts to teacher compensation and increased class sizes for children to balance the budget. Balancing the budget without harming the classroom takes time and input from teachers who inhabit the classrooms (e.g. – what services in DCSS work for their kids and what services do not work for their kids). Critical thinking skills and novel approaches need to be tried. An utter absence of the above is why we are in the shape we are in now and Johnson and Thurmond propose to run a quick chop, chop on the budget – more of the same we do not need.
Beverly Fraud
February 24th, 2013
11:26 am
Well it’s clear Eugene Walker, aka Clown Central, can’t do much for the students of DCSS. But perhaps a contentious, nasty lawsuit, played out like a train wreck in the public eye can shed some much needed SUNLIGHT on Markie Mark Elgart and the minions of SACS.
Isn’t it ironic that the privateer supporters who passed Amendment 1 might end up doing their best good not by having students bypass school systems like DeKalb, but instead bypassing organizations like SACS.
Beverly Fraud
February 24th, 2013
11:29 am
CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE:
In going back and reading the original post, I must admit Maureen gave a no holds barred (yes one more ‘rassalin metaphor) account of issues concerning SACS. Tough, fair and legitimate questions-lets hope the AJC will ask them of Markie Mark.
INDEED!
Dunwoody Mom
February 24th, 2013
11:31 am
Trying to make SACS the issue here is clear deflection. We’re done with deflection whether it be the continued attempt by arrogant blowhards to “blame” SACS or the “race card” several BOE members still try to hang on to.
gsmith
February 24th, 2013
11:40 am
i think the easiest and best solution would be to separate the county two different counties , north dekalb and south dekalb counties. this way each could have its own schools and its own school boards. and have its own representation all together. i think this would make everyone happy
Beverly Fraud
February 24th, 2013
12:29 pm
Trying to make SACS the issue here is clear deflection.
To those who are making excuses for the board; yes. To those who see the big picture no!
Hard to accuse someone of saying they are trying to “deflect” when they regularly refer to the board as “Clown Central” isn’t it Dunwoody Mom?
Dunwoody Mom, I get your point but I would suggest checking out Invisible Serf’s Collar, and you might start to realize that DCSS is the “clear deflection” for what SACS is trying to do nationwide
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
12:30 pm
Didn’t I just hear on local news that a Federal Judge just barred Governor Deal from removing the DeKalb Six until a hearing before the Federal Court? I just don’t see how this reactionary law does not violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Just my opinion.
OriginalProf
February 24th, 2013
12:38 pm
@ Truth in Moderation, Feb. 24, 10:24 am: “The only thing that counts, in a nation with the rule of law, is DID THE SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS BREAK ANY LAW?? Someone posted earlier that a state attorney said they did, regarding their handling of funds. THIS IS WHAT SHOULD BE PURSUED! WHY ARE THEY NOT BEING CHARGED?”
The law provides that the Governor can remove a local school board IF the state BOE recommends this. This in turn hinges on whether SACS is about to remove the county schools’ accreditation because of the actions of this local school board. Further, the grounds for reinstatement of the board members is whether or not they will improve the ability of the board to retain or reattain the schools’ accreditation.
So whether or not the board member has broken criminal laws is a whole other ballgame. I would think that it takes a lot longer to remove a board member on criminal grounds than on the limited one of hindering school accreditation.
This is not to rule out a later charge of criminal behavior………
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
12:44 pm
I may be in the dark on this, but just who elected Mark Elgart to run our school systems? Who died and made him the Educational Zeus of the Public Schools? My friends tell me that they didn’t vote for Mark Elgart, and I am positive that I never voted for the man to run anything. Heck, why doesn’t the State just turn over all of the school boards to Mark Elgart, BackwardEd, and SACS? Oh, I forgot. I already has.
DunMoody
February 24th, 2013
12:50 pm
I noticed a comment by a legislator in one of the AJC’s news items today that finding another accrediting agency is under discussion. What about the Georgia Accrediting Commission, already in place, affiliated with UGA, and providing accreditation for schools throughout Georgia? Why isn’t that a viable alternative to SACs? I’m curious.
OriginalProf
February 24th, 2013
1:34 pm
I thought that I’d provide some factual perspective on SACS, which I know only in connection with its Commission on Colleges branch. This is separate from the branch in play here: the Council on Accreditation and School Improvement. SACS accredits over 13,000 public/private schools from pre-school to the university in the South, in the states of Virginia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee and Texas, as well as schools for US students in Mexico, the Caribbean, and Central and South America. It is recognized by the US Dept. of Education and the Council for Higher Education. It’s not a minor league player.
Among colleges and universities, it’s widely respected. Grounds for probation of individual colleges/ universities include financial fraud, and problems in faculty and board governance. They also monitor the way the curriculum is taught. I know from personal experience that one ground for probation is hiring grad students to teach core classes without 18 hours of coursework in the field they’re teaching. (Think of this, ye parents of college students who want to be sure they’re taught by the qualified!) Incidentally, Bootney Farnsworth, GPC is now on warning of probation with SACS.
To be frank, trying to get a different accrediting agency for Georgia’s schools—especially one that is limited to those in Georgia—seems to me like tilting at windmills.
DeKalb Inside Out
February 24th, 2013
2:02 pm
SACS was recently kicked out of North Carolina. Texas accredits its own schools. I’ve talked to many legislative types that are chomping at the bit to get SACS out. That being said, it will be difficult given the quid pro quo between SACS and school executive administrators.
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
3:11 pm
SACS has long since outlived any usefulness in Georgia. Georgia needs to look at what is being done in North Carolina and Texas. The Georgia Accrediting Commission (GAC) has been accrediting schools in Georgia since 1904 (109 years). It is under the executive leadership of the esteemed Dr. Carvin L. Brown. GAC is already recognized by Georgia Law, and high school seniors graduating from high schools accredited by GAC still get the Hope Scholarship.
Do you think that Duke University or UNC-Chapel Hill give a rat’s behind about SACS? No. Georgia Tech and UGA should take the same attitude about kids graduating from schools here in Georgia who are graduating from high schools accredited by GAC or the State itself. SACS should be shut down in Georgia. It’s done much more harm in Georgia schools than any help rendered. Mark Elgart has run SACS into the ground with his apparent ego-tripping.
I hope that the Federal Judge will clip SACS’s wings here in Georgia and restore some sense to accreditation.
dekalbite@Dr. Trotter
February 24th, 2013
3:32 pm
It appears your posts have more to do with attempting to discredit Mr. Elgart and SACS and less to do with the education of DeKalb students. This is the Board that made DeKalb teachers the lowest compensated in the metro area and gave them unmanageable class sizes to balance the budget (or in fact to run a deficit which is against the law).
I’m assuming you don’t have very many DeKalb teachers in MACE. If so, what has your organization done for the teachers and students of DeKalb?
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
3:43 pm
“The law provides that the Governor can remove a local school board IF the state BOE recommends this. This in turn hinges on whether SACS is about to remove the county schools’ accreditation because of the actions of this local school board.”
@Prof
You are referring to the new Unconstitutional law. Prior to the created DeKalb/ClayCo debacle, citizens had the right to elect (and not reelect) their school board members locally, BECAUSE THE LOCAL SCHOOL FUNDING WAS PROVIDED BY LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES. THIS IS WHAT MAKES THEM A “PUBLIC” SCHOOL. If the school board was criminally mismanaging funds, it would have been lawful under the old system to remove the criminals and put them in jail. The citizens would then elect their replacement. If no one is willing to press charges when criminal activity is observed, or no criminal wrongdoing can be proved, then the school board must stay until the end of their term and face voters at the poles for the next term.
Under the new law, an unelected 501c3 CHARITY has ALL POWER over the school boards. FROM NOW ON I WILL REFER TO FORMER PUBLIC SCHOOLS AS “501c3 AdvancEd schools.”
Citizens, there is a way out: overturn the Georgia Compulsory Education Law. All powers that be, regarding government sponsored education, will become NULL AND VOID. We have crossed the Rubicon….no hope of reform is left!
dekalbite
February 24th, 2013
3:43 pm
“DEKALB COUNTY, Ga. — Channel 2 Action News has learned that a federal judge has responded to a request to keep Gov. Nathan Deal from announcing the possible suspension of members of the DeKalb County School Board.
Sources said the judge signed the order over the weekend.
Deal is set to make some sort of announcement on Monday which comes after the state Board of Education recommended six board members be removed from office. The judge’s ruling allows Deal to make a decision, but that decision cannot be enforced until a hearing is held.
A Channel 2 Action News crew is trying to get responses from the DeKalb School Board, the governor’s office. Watch live reports on Channel 2 Action News at 6. ”
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-school-boards-future-delayed-fed-judge/nWYSt/
dekalbite
February 24th, 2013
3:48 pm
Here is the law that was not followed by the DeKalb BOE:
http://www.audits.ga.gov/NALGAD/36812-6.html
“(a) The governing authority shall establish by ordinance, local law, or appropriate resolution a fiscal year for the operations of the local government.
(b) (1) Each unit of local government shall adopt and operate under an annual balanced budget for the general fund, each special revenue fund, and each debt service fund in use by the local government. The annual balanced budget shall be adopted by ordinance or resolution and administered in accordance with this article.
(2) Each unit of local government shall adopt and operate under a project-length balanced budget for each capital projects fund in use by the government. The project-length balanced budget shall be adopted by ordinance or resolution in the year that the project initially begins and shall be administered in accordance with this article. The project-length balanced budget shall appropriate total expenditures for the duration of the capital project.
(3) A budget ordinance or resolution is balanced when the sum of estimated revenues and appropriated fund balances is equal to appropriations.”
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
4:04 pm
@ dekalbite: Why don’t you go to the MACE website and read the testimonials from the DeKalb teachers about the effectiveness of MACE? I am sure that you know how to get there. Ha! You let me worry about protecting and empowering the MACE teacher-members in DeKalb. I can assure that they appreciate MACE and MACE’s aggressive advocacy for them…one member at a time. MACE makes no pretense of changing the budget, policies, etc. ODE just goes through this charade, jumping through hoops as the school board ignores them. It is so easy to prance around at the Capitol and speak at the school board meetings, but it is so much work actually taking care of the individual teachers…one member at a time. The principals understand this. This is why principals are very leery of messing with MACE members.
MACE doesn’t represent students or parents. MACE only represents classroom educators…one member at time. Do you get the drift yet? By the way, MACE knows that you can’t have good learning conditions until you first have good teaching conditions. We have seen firsthand what happens to a school system which is taken over by SACS. The student discipline goes out the window. Since Clayton County was effectively taken over by SACS in 2008, the school system has precipitously gone straight to H@LL in a hand basket. The teachers are treated like dog poop and the prisoners are running the prison, if I may use this metaphor. A teacher files a grievance, and H. R. chief, Douglas (Doug) Hendrix apparently thinks that he can dismiss the grievance. Well, not if it is a MACE grievance. We have a practice at MACE that when a grievance if filed and Human Resources has the temerity to think that it can ignore the Georgia Law (O. C. G. A. 20-2-989.5 et seq.) relative to Certified Employee Complaints, then we just picket. We ask: “Fairly private grievance or a very public picket? You choose.” So, I presume that we will be in front of North Clayton High School and Lee Street Elementary School (second picket at Lee Street this year) this week and next week. Also, I am sure that we will pay a visit to Mr. Hendrix and new superintendent Luvenia Jackson on the sidewalks of Fifth Avenue. Hmm. So, you see, “dekalbite,” why the teachers like us so? We don’t despair and throw our hands in the air. We get results. Same thing for the teachers in DeKalb County.
I hope that this was responsive to your query?
CompetenceNotDiversity
February 24th, 2013
4:06 pm
@Truth in Moderation – you don’t think $13M in legal fees in one year is criminal mismangement of funds?!?!? You clearly don’t understand what the phrase means.
mountain man
February 24th, 2013
4:28 pm
I hope SACS strips Dekalb county’s accredtitation on Monday, since a judge has enjoined the Governor from ousting the board and appointing new members. Walker has vowed to fight to the death (of the DCSS). If you live in Dekalb county, start thinking state chartered schools.
Dr. Trotter – your idictment of SACS smacks of not wanting to be responsible to anyone. Are you claiming that SACs has made up everything about Dekalb and is nothing but a witch hunt?
Decatur Dad
February 24th, 2013
4:32 pm
I totally agree with Dr. Trotter. SACS should be SHUT DOWN and not allowed to place any schools on probation or strip their accreditation. SACS is irrelevant and an outlaw organization in my opinion. While I agree that some of the board members in Dekalb Schools should be replaced, Gov. Deal has no right to replace them. The Dekalb voters elected them and should be the only ones allowed to replace them. Don’t even think about taking away my voting rights. Deal needs to mind his own business, Fran Millar needs to go sit and SACS needs to be SHUT DOWN!
mountain man
February 24th, 2013
4:35 pm
“BECAUSE THE LOCAL SCHOOL FUNDING WAS PROVIDED BY LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES. THIS IS WHAT MAKES THEM A “PUBLIC” SCHOOL”
Not all school funding is from local property taxes, but I’ll bite. Let the State withhold all state funding from Dekalb county while this lawsuit is going on.
mountain man
February 24th, 2013
4:39 pm
You know, Dr. Trotter, I used to have some respect for you, but your ranting against SACS and Elgart has made you seem like a self-serving educrat.
Wrecker
February 24th, 2013
4:49 pm
I agree completely that SACS is out of hand; however (and this is a big “However”), to suggest that the DeKalb School Board should not be removed is ludicrous. The criminal mismanagement of this once-proud system is obvious to everyone. The SACS issue is a red herring. Dr. Trotter can continue to rant about the misuse of power by SACS. I will continue to wonder why it matters.
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
4:50 pm
I must be really hitting the nail on the head about SACS…because the critics of the school board are reacting quite a bit to my posts. Good. If a person is not receiving criticisms, he or she is probably not doing anything, including Prince Mark Elgart. Sure some of the things that SACS says about the school board are true…the same thing could be said for Sam or Robert down at the corner café in Tucker or Dunwoody. Heck, a dead clock is right at least two times a day, right?
I am just saying what Maureen suggested in this topic, viz., the State has ceded power to an unaccountable and unelected private company. SACS’s investigations, by the way, are really not “investigations.” SACS (erh, Mark Elgart) apparently already has its mind made up. This was the case in Clayton County too. Much, much documentary evidence about wrong-doings of Chairperson Ericka Davis and her compatriot Rod Johnson was provided to SACS but this overwhelming evidence was totally ignored. It apparently didn’t fit into the narrative that ole Markie was trying to tell. The actual “report” that SACS published on February 15, 2008 on Clayton County was, in the immortal of Norreese Haynes, “a sham and a farce.” Mr. Haynes actually had his press release condemning this biased and skewed “report” published by the AJC the same February 15.
I think that Prince Mark Elgart has really never had many people (if any at all) at that point to challenge him. Mr. Haynes and I have been criticizing the actions or lack of actions of Prince Mark Elgart and SACS ever since this accreditation charade was foisted upon the working stiff county of Clayco, proceeding to destroy this defenseless county.
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
5:01 pm
Mountain Man, I am sure that you will get over it. Heck, you have the rest of your life to get over it. I am dead set against SACS. I have said it over and over that it is a phony, private organization eating like a typical hog at the public trough. It adds nothing to the Gross National Product. It is a leach and sucks off of the public teat. Conflicts-of-interest galore.
Mountain Man, I believe in the democracy. How ’bout you? Democracy or Oligarchy?
I am all for empowering the classroom educators to teach. Support them in discipline and realize that you can never have good learning conditions until you first have good teaching conditions. How can you teach the DeKalb children about democracy when they see their democratically-elected school board members defrocked and re-placed by kiss-ups appointed by the Governor?
Heck, let the voters take care of the situation. We do this for city councils, county commissions, the legislature, the President of the United States, and so forth. It’s just too much money involved. It’s all about the cheddar. Do you have some cheddar at stake, Mountain Man? Ha!
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
5:02 pm
I enjoy discussing this issue with you guys. But, I have to go get me something to eat. Take care. Power to the People! Ha!
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
5:04 pm
@mountain man
“Not all school funding is from local property taxes, but I’ll bite. Let the State withhold all state funding from Dekalb county while this lawsuit is going on.”
That’s correct. But it wasn’t that way in the beginning. We decided to apply communistic ideals and “redistribute” the wealth through additional state funding to “equalize’ the “public” schools. Hence, I usually have referred to them as “government” schools because the public’s direct influence over their local schools and taxes has been greatly diluted. As to your suggestion, this is a far more Constitutional approach for the ills of DeKalb than to FOOLISHLY FURTHER REMOVE ANY LOCAL CONTROL THAT WAS LEFT, by abdicating citizens’ responsibility to influence their schools to an UNELECTED 501c3 CHARITY MONOPOLY!
And you think you are smart???????
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
5:13 pm
@wrecker
“to suggest that the DeKalb School Board should not be removed is ludicrous. The criminal mismanagement of this once-proud system is obvious to everyone.”
If you are going to use the term “criminal,” then the Board should be properly charged with their offenses and have their day in court. WHY HAS THIS NOT HAPPENED?
This is the way of the Constitution. To bring in an UNELECTED 501c3 CHARITY MONOPOLY to get them out with mere charges of accreditation problems (as defined by the charity monopoly), is a crime as well. That is why the Board now has grounds to sue DeKalb!
Amanda
February 24th, 2013
5:14 pm
Shouldn’t we care if the law is unconstitutional? I’m as upset as the next person about what the Dekalb board does but I care about the rule of law. If we remove people we don’t like with a law that isn’t within the constitutional authority of Georgia or violates something under the US Constitution, we are in deep trouble. Any law can be passed but it doesn’t mean it is constitutional. We should care about that. The place for this to be addressed is the ballot box. Be careful before you trash the constitution. You might need it in the future.
dekalbite@Dr. Trotter
February 24th, 2013
5:24 pm
“@ dekalbite: Why don’t you go to the MACE website and read the testimonials from the DeKalb teachers about the effectiveness of MACE? I am sure that you know how to get there. Ha! You let me worry about protecting and empowering the MACE teacher-members in DeKalb.”
Why, thank you, Dr. Trotter. I did just that. I saw three testimonials from DeKalb teachers. Only one of those teachers still works for DeKalb. One of those “DeKalb” teachers left in the beginning of 2010-11 school year and one of those teachers left in the beginning of the 2011-12 school year. You might want to get more up to date testimonials of teachers who actually teach in DeKalb.
The DeKalb teachers you represent are now paid the lowest paid teachers in the metro area. It appears neither you nor the ODE has been able to help with DeKalb teacher compensation. I know – you can’t control the Board of Education that cut DeKalb teachers’ pay. You just want to keep that same Board in office. As long as they are in office, DeKalb teachers will NEVER see their pay come back to the levels of the other metro systems because teachers (and students) are not these BOE members’ priority.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
5:48 pm
@dekalbite
Thanks for your research. LOL! Regarding the fact that AdvancEd has major office space in Decatur, wouldn’t that give the impression of a CONFLICT OF INTEREST regarding their audit of the DeKalb school system? Also, since Decatur has all of its public schools under a charter, has it been protected in any way from the actions of the current school board? Please give us your thoughts on this.
waltbellamy
February 24th, 2013
7:05 pm
Excuse my ignorance of the virtues of any of the alphabet soup of acronyms in this sphere. In my defense I do know a bit about Abdullah the Butcher and El Mongol. I will assume for the sake of argument that SACS = SATAN. A simple question, what authority would endorse the education provided to the students by DeKalb County School System?
mountain man
February 24th, 2013
7:05 pm
“Heck, let the voters take care of the situation.”
Sure, I will agree to that. Let Dekalb county goes down the tubes because the voters are not smart enough to elect a decent board. But SACS is the agreed accrediting agency, so if they do not comply, then they need to have their accreditation stripped. To give parents options, the State government should put out an amendment that cities can form their own school systems (like they used to do). Luckily, the State has amended the constitution to allow charter schools at the State level.
Democracy at it best. Let them fail.
Dekalbite@Mountain man
February 24th, 2013
7:32 pm
“Let Dekalb county goes down the tubes because the voters are not smart enough to elect a decent board”
DeKalb voters include most of the Emory faculty, Emory medical doctors, and the Centers of Disease scientific personnel. I guess those are the “not smart” voters you are referring to.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
7:45 pm
But how can the broke U.S. compete with THAT, you ask? Well the Prez is a WIZ at finding money we don’t have. He just follows the GOLD BRICK ROAD! Not to be boring, the U.S. has responded to the challenge with a BAM! (Brain Activity Map). We plan to map EVERY SINGLE NEURON in the HUMAN BRAIN! That means we have to figure out how to light up the LIVE brain like a Christmas tree to record just what your brain looks like while you are looking at pictures of por…err comic books! Or what your brain looks like when you are telling off a Federal Judge in court. Or when you are LYING. You get the “picture”. These ACIVE BRAIN MAPS will be stored on super computers and will be the data sent to the EU for their “PROJECT SCARECROW”. I am sure your brain is now bursting from info overload!
Well, I promised documentation, so here it is:
Your Brain on Drugs: Gleaned from THE DECADE OF THE BRAIN v1.0
ht tp://arc hives.drug abuse.gov/pdf/mon ographs/105.pdf
This is your brain on neuroscience
on rappoport.word press.co m/2013/02/20/this-is-your-brain-on-neuro science/
An overview: Brain Activity Map Project
ht tp://en.wiki pedia.org/wiki/Brain_Activity_Map_Project
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
7:47 pm
THE WIZARD OF O-bama
It occurred to me that the only LONG TERM solution to ALL of our educational ills is NEW BRAINS FOR ALL! Remember Scarecrow and his catchy song?
h t tp://w ww.you tube.com/ watch?v=tMPkqI3nc GM (remove spaces)
This is no longer just a PIPE DREAM! We can all be smarter than a 5th grader because the government and the President have declared THE DECADE OF THE BRAIN v2.0 (Bush declared v1.0)! In TEN YEARS and with $3 BILLION +++++, we will have a genuine artificial working digital HUMAN BRAIN! You will be able to carry your new brain around ON YOUR IPAD! (well….maybe). I know you think I am crazy (this new brain will fix that) so I will DOCUMENT everything I tell you…
First, the bad news. the U.S. will play second fiddle to the EU in this JOINT ENDEAVOR. Well someone has to be the GUINEA PIG. We can’t ALL have the fun jobs. But that is OK, because we will ALL get new brains. Here is the EU version of “PROJECT SCARECROW” (This is my title, theirs is boring, “The Human Brain Project.” Please watch their AWESOME VIDEO!
ht tp://w ww.hu man brain project.eu (remove spaces)
bu2
February 24th, 2013
8:00 pm
The board did not approve a budget with a deficit. Ramona Tyson simply ignored the budget. If there’s anyone who broke the law, its the administration of the school district, Ramona and her now fired CFO.
Now the board didn’t pay attention and didn’t monitor properly, just like McChesney, Speaks, Bowen, Womack, Walker, Cunningham, Copelin-Woods, Redovian and Roberts didn’t monitor Lewis stealing. But incompetence is not a crime.
Dr. John Trotter
February 24th, 2013
8:12 pm
@ “dekalbite”: Let’s see now…we have, I think, 180 school systems in the State of Georgia. Would ten testimonials from each system satisfy you? 1,800 testimonials? By the way, I saw at least seven or eight testimonials from DeKalb teachers, but who really expected you to be accurate, right?
Make sure that you click the link at the bottom of the testimonial page which takes you to a PDP with other testimonials.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
9:08 pm
OOPS! LOL
Should read “BRAIN ACTIVITY MAP”
BTW, to post I had to divide story into 3 sections. In case you didn’t notice, part 2 posted first, part 1 posted next, and then part 3. PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ THE LINKS. Our children are at stake!
mountain man
February 24th, 2013
9:08 pm
“DeKalb voters include most of the Emory faculty, Emory medical doctors, and the Centers of Disease scientific personnel. I guess those are the “not smart” voters you are referring to.”
Do you really believe that they voted for the likes of Walker and crew? I am sure they were in the minority.
mountain man
February 24th, 2013
9:13 pm
“Be careful before you trash the constitution. You might need it in the future.”
What is unconstitutional about this law? Someone needs to point out the exact language in the constitution that says elected officials may not be removed.
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
9:13 pm
“The goal is to produce the first map of brain function to explore every signal sent by every cell and track how the resulting data flows through neural networks and is ultimately translated into thoughts, feelings and actions. While work is already underway to understand the wiring diagram of the whole brain— known as the connectome— this project would go beyond that to try to understand what this circuitry actually does.”
Read more: ht tp://health land.time.com/2013/02/19/b rain-map-president-ob ama-proposes-first-detailed-guide-of-human-b rain-function/#ixzz2LrcKoQ6p (remove spaces)
THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT WHITE PAPER! It gives the scientific details of how they will use NANOPARTICLES inside the LIVING human brain for producing ACTIVITY IMAGES for MAPPING:
“The Whole Brain Activity Map: Merging Nanoscience and Neuroscience for Technology and Health”
http://aca demic com mons.co lum bia.edu/it em/ac:147966 (remove spaces)
QUESTION: WHO WILL BE THE HUMAN LAB RATS TO PROVIDE THE BRAINS TO BE MAPPED?
Well, here’s a theory:
Currently, at the President’s urging, Proposed Bill No. 374 (LCO No 2001). is in the Committee on Public Health in the STATE OF CONNECTICUT. It’s Statement of purpose: To provide BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSESSMENTS to children.
I spoke with the bill’s sponsors and the chair of the committee and NO ONE COULD GIVE ME A DEFINITION OF “Behavioral Health Assessment”. NOT EVEN A GENERAL ONE! This is ALL the bill is about! It will REQUIRE that public school and home school children in grades 6, 8, 10, and 12 “to have a confidential BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT…and “each health care provider performing a child’s BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT to complete the appropriate form SUPPLIED BY THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION VERIFYING THAT THE CHILD HAS RECEIVED THE ASSESSMENT.
Our CHILDREN will be the guinea pigs! PLEASE FIGHT THIS! It is planned to be railroaded INTO EVERY STATE!
Dekalbite@Mountain man
February 24th, 2013
9:56 pm
“Do you really believe that they voted for the likes of Walker and crew? I am sure they were in the minority.”
Oh yes they did. The highly affluent Fernbank community where most of those Emory and CDC people live put Walker into office. They got a $19,000,000 new school and as much protection for the Fernbank Science Center (with it’s selective STT program) as they could. They also escaped redistricting when every other school that was overcrowded or under crowded was redistricted. They were not in the minority in their vote. They came out in force for Walker in a sparsely attended election. Fernbank is the most powerful community in DeKalb. They are smart, affluent, organized and plugged in politically. They always know which way the wind is blowing. Newly elected Marshall Orson comes from Fernbank. He is friendly with Walker, and Thurmond says Orson suggested he be the superintendent (didn’t you read Maureen’s interview with Thurmond?). You do not understand DeKalb politics.
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2011/01/attention-losers-this-is-how-you-win.html
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/letter-from-fernbank-elementary-school.html
Truth in Moderation
February 24th, 2013
10:57 pm
It’s Sunday. With all the strife and stress in the world, I thought it would be a good time to kick back and sing “Kumbaya.” Won’t you join me?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz9BNwbKM0M
Dekalbite@Dr. trotter
February 24th, 2013
11:34 pm
“@ “dekalbite”: Let’s see now…we have, I think, 180 school systems in the State of Georgia. Would ten testimonials from each system satisfy you? 1,800 testimonials? By the way, I saw at least seven or eight testimonials from DeKalb teachers, but who really expected you to be accurate, right?”
I found other “DeKalb” teachers who no longer work for DeKalb giving testimonials on the MACE webiste if YOU want to be accurate.
The point is – what have you done to keep the compensation for those DeKalb teachers who belong to MACE from being reduced by the Board to the lowest in the metro area? Why don’t you ask these DeKalb teachers who belong to MACE if they are glad you are advocating for those BOE members to keep their jobs? I would be most interested to hear the DeKalb Teachers who belong to MACE say they want the very people who gutted their pay and their classrooms to stay in office.
DeKalb Inside Out
February 25th, 2013
9:16 am
Mountain Man – “What is unconstitutional about this law? “
I think the lawyers and some other people are upset with a few different things.
Elected Board
ARTICLE VIII. – EDUCATION – Section V – Paragraph II
“Each school system shall be under the management and control of a board of education, the members of which shall be elected as provided by law.” – The Constitution specifically says the board members shall be elected.
Due Process
I’ve heard a number of people smarter than me talk about how this denies people due process. A group of elected officials can’t be removed because of the actions of a few. They must be individually tried … or something like that. It sounded reasonable when they were talking about it.
All Or Nothing
This violation of the State Board irks me
OCGA § 20-2-73 [Suspension and removal of local school board members] shall apply to all local board of education members, regardless of when they were elected or appointed. House Bill 115 [adding protection for recently elected Board of Education members] has not passed yet and once passed won’t be effective for a while.
Mountain Man, what says you. Do the ends justify the means?
DeKalb Inside Out
February 25th, 2013
9:35 am
Walker and Emory/Fernbank
I thought this article gave an interesting analysis of the relationship between Walker and the Emory area.
“Walker one four precincts in the Emory area. Not only did he win them, he won them by double digits.”
Here are the precinct numbers:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtoPT5XcHyhcdHhubi01NDRUR2hIWmxaYkh0eGN5amc&authkey=CLq968IF&hl=en&authkey=CLq968IF#gid=0
ChristyS
February 25th, 2013
10:24 am
Bottom line: it’s all rigged. I live in Cobb County. When we complained to SACS, the school board and administration hand picked the parents that SACS would interview. Strangely, some of us vocal critics were not selected. Hmmm??? I’m with Trotter. Ditch Elgart and SACS. They wield way too much power and involve themselves in pissing matches, not substantive issues. Elgart’s main concern with Cobb was the fact that the board members weren’t in agreement. HELLO?????? That’s called democracy. Maybe he should have been more concerned about the clandestine meetings in violation of the law.
DeKalb Inside Out
February 25th, 2013
10:55 am
To continue with Christy’s point. I want to know what happened with those textbooks. Howe and Perone are the two people with the most knowledge regarding that issue. Neither SACS nor the State Board ever talked to them about the textbooks. I would like to have internal affairs or somebody sit next to Howe and Perone for however long it takes to get to the bottom of the textbook issue.
OriginalProf
February 25th, 2013
10:56 am
@ Truth in Moderation, Feb. 24, 10:57 pm. I have to admit it, this post is the first one of yours that has made me lol.
Chamblee Dad
February 25th, 2013
12:22 pm
My only other involvement with SACS was with a single school review of a nearby kindergarten. It went exactly how you would imagine, on the ground review of the school, staff, management, etc. They were accredited, by the way.
This systemwide accreditation with focus essentially only on the board? Just not sure. Our board is dysfunctional, perhaps beyond repair, and a new election might not fix it. But SACS’s focus is essentially only on the board. They caused much of this mess, but to me, the many supers & central office caused even more. Until completely addressed, we w/n get this thing fully on-track.
So short answer – yes, SACS has too much power, at least how the wield it. But some form of accredidation is needed – other agency, school-by-school, certainly worth exploring.
Private Citizen
February 25th, 2013
5:58 pm
Mr. Georgia, Very interesting comments re: SACS and macro-effect on Clayton County.
The thing I wonder is how much are they paid for services? And can this be done more efficiently via “in-house” through the state government. I am guess there are some “executive compensation” salaries going on over at SACS? How much are they paid and where does the money go?
DeloresT.
February 27th, 2013
11:03 pm
Someone or some group needs to investigate SACS! It’s true that the voters in DeKalb and other districts may need to recall some board members, but SACS has become the elephant in the room. SACS makes a complaint, parents get up in arms, the offending school system “pays off SACS” by doing its bidding…..SACS makes money and the school system that they have complained about goes back to its normal activities. SACS is a bully and someone needs to recognize this!
DeloresT.
February 27th, 2013
11:06 pm
Does anyone think it strange that Gov. Deal gets to challenge the ethics of DeKalb County Board members, when he left Congress in an effort to run from ethics charges?